alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin, ERG

DATE: September 30, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate 

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04572]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National 

Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model, developed as part of the Environmental 

Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power 

Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA-821-R-15-006 (DCN 

SE04527). The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment 

ID Document Name Brief Description

A1

Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam EA 

IRW Model - Wildlife and Human 

Health Module - Comparison 

Database - Option A (CPP) - DCN 

SE04572A1

CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human 

health module results between baseline and Option A. 

Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table 

Generator and the Human Health Summary Table 

Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP 

rulemakings.

A2

Attachment 2: CBI_Final Steam EA 

IRW Model - Wildlife and Human 

Health Module - Comparison 

Database - Option B (CPP) - DCN 

SE04572A2

CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human 

health module results between baseline and Option B. 

Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table 

Generator and the Human Health Summary Table 

Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP 

rulemakings.

A3

Attachment 3: CBI_Final Steam EA 

IRW Model - Wildlife and Human 

Health Module - Comparison 

Database - Option C (CPP) - DCN 

SE04572A3

CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human 

health module results between baseline and Option C. 

Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table 

Generator and the Human Health Summary Table 

Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP 

rulemakings.

A4

Attachment 4: CBI_Final Steam EA 

IRW Model - Wildlife and Human 

Health Module - Comparison 

Database - Option D (CPP) - DCN 

SE04572A4

CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human 

health module results between baseline and Option D. 

Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table 

Generator and the Human Health Summary Table 

Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP 

rulemakings.

A5

Attachment 5: CBI_Final Steam EA 

IRW Model - Wildlife and Human 

Health Module - Comparison 

Database - Option E (CPP) - DCN 

SE04572A5

CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human 

health module results between baseline and Option E. 

Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table 

Generator and the Human Health Summary Table 

Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP 

rulemakings.
#### § 11.1101 Purpose of rules.

The rules in this subpart establish requirements for officers serving on passenger ships as defined in § 11.1103 of this subpart.
Exhibit 1

Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.367 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.368 Filed 04/19/16 Page 2 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.369 Filed 04/19/16 Page 3 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.370 Filed 04/19/16 Page 4 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.371 Filed 04/19/16 Page 5 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.372 Filed 04/19/16 Page 6 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.373 Filed 04/19/16 Page 7 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.374 Filed 04/19/16 Page 8 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.375 Filed 04/19/16 Page 9 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.376 Filed 04/19/16 Page 10 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.377 Filed 04/19/16 Page 11 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.378 Filed 04/19/16 Page 12 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.379 Filed 04/19/16 Page 13 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.380 Filed 04/19/16 Page 14 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.381 Filed 04/19/16 Page 15 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.382 Filed 04/19/16 Page 16 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.383 Filed 04/19/16 Page 17 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.384 Filed 04/19/16 Page 18 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.385 Filed 04/19/16 Page 19 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.386 Filed 04/19/16 Page 20 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.387 Filed 04/19/16 Page 21 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.388 Filed 04/19/16 Page 22 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.389 Filed 04/19/16 Page 23 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.390 Filed 04/19/16 Page 24 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.391 Filed 04/19/16 Page 25 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.392 Filed 04/19/16 Page 26 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.393 Filed 04/19/16 Page 27 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.394 Filed 04/19/16 Page 28 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.395 Filed 04/19/16 Page 29 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.396 Filed 04/19/16 Page 30 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.397 Filed 04/19/16 Page 31 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.398 Filed 04/19/16 Page 32 of 33
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 41-2, PageID.399 Filed 04/19/16 Page 33 of 33
#### Maynard N. Clement, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*David H. Smith et al., Respondents.

#### *Clement*v. *Smith,*128 App. Div. 859, affirmed.

(Argued December *3,*1909;

decided December 17, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made November 27, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover upon a liquor tax bond.

*S. H. Salisbury, Royal R. Scott, Albert O. Briggs*and *Russel Headley*for appellant.

*Charles S. Mackenzie, Walter F. Wood*and *Thomas F. Curran*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT oo -—_—
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL Way 15 1995
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, INC., CLEAK US DSTA¢! CoA
Plaintiff, OISTAICT OF COLUMBIA

ve Civil Action No. 95-0349 (JHG)
FEDERAL FLECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

ORDER

The following menorializes the rulings made at the status
conference held this date:

The parties will file a stipulated protective order for the
Court’s approval on or before May 19, 1995.

Defendant will generate a chronology of this matter ant
produce of copy of the chronology to plaintiff on or before May 24,
1995. A notice to this effect will be filed with the Court that
same day.

Plaintiff's motion for Summary judgment will be. ¢iled. on or
before June 19, 1995; defendant's opposition to plaintir¢’s motion
for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment
(preferably filed as a single document) will be submitted on or
before Suly 19, 1995; plaintiff’s reply on its own notion for
summary judgment and opposition to defendant's Cross-motion fer

summary judgment (preferably filed as a Single document) wil) be

eo


due on or before July 24, 1995; defendant must submit its reply on

its cross-motion for summary judgment by August 4, 1995.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

May /S, 1995 Aas Nese - Z

JOYCE HENS GREEN
United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 12622)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Collaborative Studies on Lung Stem Cell Biology and Cell Based Therapy.                    

*Date:*                         April 20, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Four Points Sheraton BWI Airport, 7032 Elm Street, Baltimore, MD 21240.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Katherine M. Malinda, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7198, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0297,                         *malindakm@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 9, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1222 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hansine J. Ullberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|   |  |                                                                                                                      
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|   |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 24, 2006

| |                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Hansine M. Ullberg
	
	

	Name: Hansine M. UllbergTitle: Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               4,048
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       58,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                           916
<INVENTORY>                                         55,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   130,759
<PP&E>                                             130,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                      63,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     230,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               62,477
<BONDS>                                            100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            521
<COMMON>                                                 2
<OTHER-SE>                                          20,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       230,029
<SALES>                                             70,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    70,319
<CGS>                                               50,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       19,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (3,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (1,429)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,985)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
[S.F. No. 24985.

Oct. 3, 1986.]

#### In re FRANK J. CREEDE, JR., a Judge of the Superior Court, on Censure.

*1099Opinion

THE COURT.*

The Commission on Judicial Performance has recommended that we publicly censure Frank J. Creede, Jr., a Judge of the Superior Court of Fresno County, for “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute.” (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (c)(2).) He has not requested review of the recommendation. Under California Rules of Court, rule 919(c), that failure “may be deemed a consent to a determination on the merits based upon the record filed by the Commission.”

The record reveals that Judge Creede is a diligent, hardworking and highly respected judge. Nonetheless, clear and convincing evidence supports the conclusion that he violated canon 3 A(5) of the California Code of Judicial Conduct, which states that “A judge should dispose promptly of the business of the court.” During a five-year period, between March 1979 and April 1985, Judge Creede repeatedly and unjustifiably delayed filing decisions in cases submitted to his court. During this time, he continued to execute erroneous salary affidavits and to collect his salary even though submitted cases remained pending and undecided in his court for periods in excess of 90 days. (See Cal. Const., art. VI, § 19; Gov. Code, § 68210; *Mardikian*v. *Commission on Judicial Performance*(1985) 40 Cal. 3d 473 [220 Cal.Rptr. 833, 709 P.2d 852].) He did not, however, knowingly falsify the salary affidavits, and did not intentionally or maliciously disregard his adjudicative responsibilities. There was no credible evidence of actual prejudice from the delays, which were partially attributable to an excessive workload and inadequate support staff. Yet he could have taken steps to monitor his cases and to dispose more promptly of submitted matters. Since the protracted delays served to damage the esteem of the public for the judiciary, his conduct was “. . . prejudicial to the administration of justice . . . .”

*1100While some members of this court would prefer a private admonishment, Judge Creede has foreclosed this sanction as a practical matter by waiving the confidentiality provisions. After reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the conclusion of the commission is justified, and that its recommendation should be adopted. This order will serve as the appropriate sanction.

*

Bird, C. J., did not participate.
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Braun, Chief
Executive Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
                    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 21st
      Century Holding
Company.





By:/s/ Michael H.
      BraunMichael
      H. Braun, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer)
              November
      15, 2010
#### Parker *v.*The State.

Submitted June 20,

Decided August 13, 1906.

Indictment fox unlawful sale of liquor. Before Judge Little-john. Crisp superior court. April 25, 1906.

*Crum & Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*Frank*4. *Hooper, solicitor-general,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. “Judicial cognizance is to be taken by the courts that the territory now embraced in the county of Crisp was, before the creation of that county, within the boundaries of Dooly county, wherein the sale of intoxicating liquors was prohibited by law. Under the express provisions of the act of 1905, authorizing the organization of new counties, the local prohibition law prevailing in Dooly county immediately became of full force and effect in the county of Crisp, and has since its creation undergone no change.” *Moore*v. *State,*ante, 414.

2. The foregoing is controlling of the legal questions involved in this case. The evidence amply sustained the verdict, and the court below did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,116,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  788,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,366,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,342,667
<PP&E>                                       3,597,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                 459,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,210,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          687,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,965,060
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,210,624
<SALES>                                      3,868,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,868,642
<CGS>                                        2,070,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,070,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               364,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             219,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,868,266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (232,371)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,635,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6947

MARY D. PETERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES MOLONY CONDON; DIRECTOR BEAUFORT

COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-99-2716-2-8)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary D. Peters, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mary D. Peters appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Peters v. Condon,

No. CA-99-2716-2-8 (D.S.C. July 11, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


     The undersigned, a member of the Board of Directors and/or as Officer of CE
CASECNAN  WATER AND  ENERGY  COMPANY,  INC.,  a  corporation  registered  in the
Republic of the Philippines  (the  "Company"),  hereby  constitutes and appoints
Douglas L.  Anderson  and Paul J.  Leighton and each of them as his/her true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for and in his/her stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on
his/her  behalf the Company's  Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
December  31, 2002 and to execute any  amendments  thereto and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with
the United  States  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  and  applicable  stock
exchanges,  with the full power and  authority  to do and perform each and every
act and thing  necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes as he might or
could  do  in  person,   hereby   ratifying   and   confirming   all  that  said
attorney-in-fact and agent or his/her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated as of March 28, 2003.

/s/ David L. Sokol
------------------------
DAVID L. SOKOL


/s/ Patrick J. Goodman
------------------------
PATRICK J. GOODMAN


/s/ David A. Baldwin
------------------------
DAVID A. BALDWIN


/s/ Linda B. Castillo
------------------------
LINDA B. CASTILLO