alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gary Brownell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Pure Bioscience;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
         is being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of the end of the period (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 22, 2003


/s/ Gary Brownell
-----------------
Gary Brownell
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### § 14.401 General.

Unless otherwise provided by Title 46 United States Code, by any act amending or supplementing that title, or by this subpart, that title as far as it governs the employment of merchant mariners remains, and any act amending or supplementing that title becomes, applicable to oceanographic research vessels.
EPA CLIMATE CHANGE TESTIMONY, C~ MAYA JEFFERSON, 

### 7/29/14

MY NAME IS MYA JEFFERSON AND I AM A STUDENT AT THE SAUL AGRICULTURAL C'Iy:LePlv(Lima:III_\Q07:IIe ~

INITIALLY I WANT TO THANK PRESIDENT OBAMA FOR TAKING ACTION TO PROTECT OUR FUTURE. REDUCING CARBON EMISSIONS THROUGH HIS CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AND HIS ENCOURGAING CLEAN ENERGY OFFERS A PROMISING DIRECTION FOR THE FUTURE. AS A YOUNG PERSON I WANT CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER AND CLEAN LANDS. I WANT CLEAN GREEN JOBS, AND GREEN TECHNOLOGICAL CAREERS TO DECEASE UNEMPLOYMENT WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIROMENT. I WANT A FUTURE THAT IS SUSTAINABLE. MY GENERATION DID NOT CREATE THIS PROBLEM BUT WITH YOUR SUPPORT WE CAN BE PART OF THE SOLUTION .

THANK YOU
§ 11.337 Requirements to qualify for an STCW endorsement as vessel security officer. ( a ) The applicant for an endorsement as vessel security officer must present satisfactory documentary evidence in accordance with the requirements in 33 CFR 104.215.
( b ) All applicants for an endorsement must meet the physical examination requirements in 46 CFR part 10, subpart C.
( c ) All applicants for this endorsement must meet the safety and suitability requirements and the National Driver Registry review requirements in § 10.209(e) of this subchapter, unless they have met these requirements within the previous 5 years in connection with another endorsement.
§ 93.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
§ 263.8 What happens if a State fails to meet the basic MOE requirement? ( a ) If any State fails to meet its basic MOE requirement for any fiscal year, then we will reduce dollar-for-dollar the amount of the SFAG payable to the State for the following fiscal year.
( b ) If a State fails to meet its basic MOE requirement for any fiscal year, and the State received a WtW formula grant under section 403(a)(5)(A) of the Act for the same fiscal year, we will also reduce the amount of the SFAG payable to the State for the following fiscal year by the amount of the WtW formula grant paid to the State.
§ 120.380 Overcurrent protection. ( a ) Overcurrent protection must be provided for each ungrounded conductor for the purpose of opening the electric circuit if the current reaches a value that causes an excessive or dangerous temperature in the conductor or conductor insulation.
( b ) The grounded conductor of a circuit must not be disconnected by a switch or circuit breaker, unless the ungrounded conductors are simultaneously disconnected.
( c ) A conductor of a control, interlock, or indicator circuit, such as a conductor for an instrument, pilot light, ground detector light, or potential transformer, must be protected by an overcurrent device.
( d ) Conductors must be protected in accordance with their current carrying capacities. If the allowable current carrying capacity does not correspond to a standard device size, the next larger overcurrent device may be used provided it does not exceed 150 per cent of the conductor current carrying capacity.
( e ) Steering gear control system circuits must be protected against short circuit.
( f ) Each steering gear feeder circuit must be protected by a circuit breaker that meets the requirements of § 58.25-55 in subchapter F of this chapter.
( g ) Each lighting branch circuit must be protected against overcurrent either by fuses or circuit breakers rated at not more than 30 amperes.
( h ) Overcurrent devices capable of carrying the starting current of the motor must be installed to protect motors, motor conductors, and control apparatus against: ( 1 ) Overcurrent due to short circuits or ground faults; and
( 2 ) Overload due to motor running overcurrent, in accordance with § 111.70-1 in subchapter J of this chapter. A protective device integral with the motor, which is responsive to both motor current and temperature, may be used.
( i ) An emergency switch must be provided in the normally ungrounded main supply conductor from a battery. The switch must be accessible and located as close to the battery as practicable.
( j ) Disconnect means must be provided on the supply side of and adjacent to all fuses for the purpose of de-energizing the fuses for inspection and maintenance purposes.
( k ) If the disconnect means is not within sight of the equipment that the circuit supplies, means must be provided for locking the disconnect device in the open position.
( l ) Fuses must be of the cartridge type only and be listed by Underwriters Laboratories or another independent laboratory recognized by the Commandant.
( m ) Each circuit breaker must meet UL 489, “Molded-Case Circuit Breakers and Circuit Breaker Enclosures,” or other standard specified by the Commandant, and be of the manually reset type designed for: ( 1 ) Inverse time delay;
( 2 ) Instantaneous short circuit protection; and
( 3 ) Switching duty if the breaker is used as a switch.
( n ) Each circuit breaker must indicate whether it is in the open or closed position.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 928, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20556, May 7, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2002-13058, 67 FR 61279, Sept. 30, 2002]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 15-1397 (TSC)

) 

v. )

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) NOTICE OF FILING

)

Defendant. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S NOTICE OF FILING OF 

CERTIFIED LISTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD DOCUMENTS

The Federal Election Commission provides notice of the filing of the following 

documents: Supplemental Certified List of Administrative Record Documents in REG 2014-06;

and Certified List of Administrative Record Documents in Matters Under Review (“MUR”)

6869R and 6942R.

Respectfully submitted,

Lisa J. Stevenson /s/ Robert W. Bonham III

Acting General Counsel Robert W. Bonham III (D.C. Bar. No. 397859)

lstevenson@fec.gov Senior Attorney 

rbonham@fec.gov 

Kevin Deeley

Associate General Counsel Haven G. Ward (D.C. Bar. No. 976090)

kdeeley@fec.gov Attorney 

hward@fec.gov 

August 24, 2017 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20463

(202) 694-1650

Case 1:15-cv-01397-TSC Document 81 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 1
§ 11.446 Requirements for master of Great Lakes and inland self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as master of Great Lakes and inland self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT is— ( 1 ) Three years of total service on vessels. One year of the required service must have been as a master, mate, or equivalent position on vessels of 50 GRT or more while holding a license or MMC endorsement as master, mate, or OUPV.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) An applicant holding a license or MMC endorsement as master of ocean, near-coastal, or Great Lakes and inland towing vessels is eligible for this endorsement after 6 months of service as master of towing vessels and completion of a limited examination. This requires 31 ⁄ 2 years of service. Two years of this service must have been served while holding a license or MMC endorsement as master or mate (pilot) of towing vessels, or mate.
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tatina Brooks,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Tatina BrooksTatina Brooks, Senior Vice President of Accounting and Financial Reporting (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


November 13, 2009
#### Sec. 15 Subcontracts.

Under Article 29 of the NSA-LUMPSUMREP Contract, the Contractor is authorized to subcontract portions of the work. However, the Contractor must obtain prior approval from the representative of the Authority, awarding the work, for each subcontract in an amount exceeding 10 percent of the contract price for the work covered by a job order or supplemental job order.
§ 12.807 Basis for denial. In addition to the requirements for an MMC established elsewhere in this subchapter, and the basis for denial established in §§ 10.209, 10.211, and 10.213 of this subchapter, an applicant for an MMC issued pursuant to this subpart must— ( a ) Have been employed for a period of at least 1 year on a foreign flag passenger vessel that is under the same common ownership or control as the U.S. flag large passenger vessel on which the applicant will be employed upon issuance of an MMC under this subpart;
( b ) Have no record of material disciplinary actions during the employment required under paragraph (a) of this section, as verified in writing by the owner or managing operator of the U.S. flag large passenger vessel on which the applicant will be employed;
( c ) Have successfully completed an employer-conducted background check to the satisfaction of both the employer and the Coast Guard; and
( d ) Meet the citizenship and identity requirements of § 12.809 of this subpart.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Andrew Hayward Jackson, Jr. v. Fort Bend County, Fort Bend County Drainage District, Fort Bend County Emergency Service District No. 7, Fort Bend County Fresh Water Supply District No. 01, Fort Bend County General Fund, and Fort Bend County Independent School District

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 2

- 00 880

- CV

Trial court case number: 21

- DCV

- 282688

Trial court: 2 40 th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Andrew Hayward Jackson, Jr. , filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 25, 2022 final judgment. On December 19, 2022, a ppellant filed a “Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,” requesting that he be permitted to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. Appellant’s motion was denied on January 5, 2023,

because the motion did not state whether appellant was permitted to proceed without payment of costs in the trial court; nor did appellant’s motion reflect that he filed a n affidavit of indigence or Statement of Inability to Pay Costs in the trial court. See T EX

. R.

C IV

. P. 145; T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(b). Further, appellant’s motion to this Court also did not include a Statement of Inability to Pay Costs, or any other evide nce of indigency. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c).

On January 17, 2023, appellant filed a “Motion for Reconsideration to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” With his motion, appellant attached a completed Statement of Inability to Pay Costs, stating that he is cur rently incarcerated by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, and has no income. The Court concludes that this is sufficient evidence of appellant’s inability to afford payment of costs on appeal.

Accordingly, appellant’s “Motion for Reconsideration to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” is grant ed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(b), (c). The Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is permitted to proceed on appeal without payment of costs

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____

/s/ April Far ris

__________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date:

___ January 24, 2023

_____
Case 1:12-cv-01140-BAH Document 13 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 1
Features:

• Map up to 11 square kilometer per flight

• 80 minute flight time

• Photogrammetry Options (RTK) - RGB & NIR

• 75m scan range with the Velodyne VLP-16 sensor

• Autonomous flight via waypoints

• We also offer an RTK Photogrammetry stand-alone 

option with the Sony A7R

The TerraHawk is the first fixed-wing UAV aircraft 

to offer LiDAR with real time point clouds. It is ideal 

for applications that require large scan areas.

All systems can be used for mobile mapping in 

airborne and ground missions. When satellite 

reception is lost for extended durations, optional 

post-processing software (NovAtel's Inertial 

Explorer) can be used to compute forward and 

reverse solutions, thereby recovering an accurate 

and smooth trajectory.

PHOENIX AERIAL TERRAHAWK T-16

Velodyne VLP-16

T16_RV2
PHOENIX AERIAL TERRAHAWK T-16

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION

MTOW 8 kg

EMPTY WEIGHT 

(excl. fuel & payload) 4 kg

WING SPAN 10'

LENGTH 2.27 m

POWER PLANT Electric Motor

MAX PAYLOAD 2.5 kg

TAKEOFF METHOD Catapult, Runway

ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION Sealed against rain, snow

PERFORMANCE

ENDURANCE 1 hour

CRUISE SPEED 42 mph

STALL SPEED (w. high lift 

system)3 13 m/s

MAX LEVEL SPEED 36 m/s

TAKEOFF RUN4 30 m

CL MAX (45 ̊ flap deflection) 1.7

CL MAX (clean wing) 1.3

Side View Front View

437

1546

Please contact us for any questions about specifications, cost, and delivery.

Email: info@phoenix-aerial.com or call: 323-577-3366

www.phoenix-aerial.com

All Rights Reserved © 2015 Phoenix Aerial Systems, Inc.

3355

437

T16_RV2

RANGE TO 

TARGET

20m

40m

60m

80m

100m

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Point Density (points/m2

)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Speed (m/s)

Point Cloud Density

LiDAR SENSOR (VLP-16)

LASER POWER Class 1 (safe eye)

LASER WAVELENGTH 905 nm

MIN RANGE 1.0 m

MAX RANGE 120 m

MAX RANGING ERROR 30 mm

RANGE RESOLUTION 2 mm

SCAN RATE 300k shots/s, up to 600k points/s

FIELD OF RANGE ±15 ̊ Vertical FOV / 360 ̊ Horizontal 

FOV

MULTIPLE ECHOES 2

POWER CONSUMPTION 8 W

DIAMETER/HEIGHT 103.3 * 71.7 mm

WEIGHT 830 g

OPERATING TEMPERATURE - 10 ̊ / 60 ̊ C

INGRESS PROTECTION IP 67

NUMBER OF LASERS/

PLANES 16

RECOMMENDED SCANNING 

HEIGHT AGL (m) 20 - 60 m
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

EBONY CRYSTAL MALCOM,

Petitioner,

v. Civil No. 2:14-CV-13059

MILLICENT WARREN,

Respondent,

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court’s “Opinion and Order Summarily Dismissing Without

Prejudice the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,” dated August 29th, 2014,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of

Respondent Millicent Warren and against Petitioner Ebony Crystal Malcom. Dated at

Detroit, Michigan, this 29th day of August 2014.

 DAVID J. WEAVER

 CLERK OF THE COURT

 S/Lisa Wagner 

By: Lisa Wagner, Case Manager

 to Judge Robert H. Cleland

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\14-13059.MALCOM.2254.Judgment.wpd

2:14-cv-13059-RHC-PTM Doc # 5 Filed 08/29/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 155
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.8 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Also, it is available for inspection at the Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG-5), Attn: Hazardous Materials Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The material is also available from the sources listed in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO), 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, + 44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org .* ( 1 ) International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code and Supplement, 2009 edition (“IMSBC Code”), incorporation by reference, excluding supplemental materials, approved for §§ 148.3; 148.5(a); 148.15(d); 148.55(b); 148.205(b); 148.220(b) and (c); 148.240(h); 148.450(a), (d), and (g).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) United Nations Publications, 2 United Nations Plaza, Room DC2-853, Dept. C089, New York, NY 10017, (800) 253-9646, *http://unp.un.org .* ( 1 ) Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Manual of Tests and Criteria, Fifth revised edition (2009) (“UN Manual of Tests and Criteria”), incorporation by reference approved for §§ 148.205(b); 148.220(b) and (c).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[75 FR 64591, Oct. 19, 2010, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60154, Sept. 30, 2013]
#### HELEN COHEN, PLAINTIFF, v. PUBLIC SERVICE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND JOHN THORNTON, DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October term, 1928

Decided March 11, 1929.

Before Justices Trenchard, Kaliscii and Lloyd.

For the rule, *Weinberger & Weinberger.*

Contra, *Henry H. Fryling*and *Carl T. Fr eg gens.*

Per Curiam.

This is plaintiff’s rule for new trial in an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff, a pedestrian, who, while attempting to cross Lexington avenue, in Passaic, came into collision with a bus of the Public Service Transportation Company.

The reasons urged for making the rule absolute are six in number, four of which pertain to rulings by the trial judge on evidence and a portion of the charge, and the remaining two that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and the result of mistake, passion, prejudice or partiality. In three of these leading questions propounded by the plaintiff’s counsel in the direct examination were overruled by the court. The questions objected to were clearly leading and were properly excluded. The fourth point presents the refusal of the court to strike out an answer to a question put to a witness for the defendant on cross-examination. The answer was substantially a characterization by the witness of testimony already given by her and from it the defendant suffered no harm.

*238The instruction complained of in the charge to the jury was not objectionable. Obviously if, as the instruction required, the driver of the bus was in the exercise of reasonable care he could not be charged with negligence in failing to anticipate that a pedestrian would- come from in front of another bus in the path of the bus he was driving. If he was proceeding with reasonable care nothing more was required of him. *Cairns*v. *Fox,*118 *Atl. Rep.*453.

The final contention that the verdict was so clearly against the weight of the evidence as to require a new trial is without merit.- There was a sharp conflict in the testimony as to liability, and in finding against the plaintiff the jury had ample justification.

The rule is discharged.
#### § 131.100 Preemptive effect.

The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33884, June 7, 2012]