alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Michael R. Kallet, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Eric E. Stickels,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oneida Financial Corp.
(the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that
he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 and that to the best of his/her knowledge:

(6)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(7)   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


    August 12, 2004                        /s/ Michael R. Kallet
----------------------                     -------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


    August 12, 2004                        /s/ Eric E. Stickels
----------------------                     -------------------------------------
Date                                       Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                  Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The MONY Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Daddario, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY
Group Inc.



|/s/    RICHARD
DADDARIORichard Daddario
|---------------------------------------



November 14, 2003



This statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The MONY Group Inc. and will be retained by The MONY Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

BRUCE O. SCARBROUGH, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-13896 

v Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

MARY JANE M. ELLIOTT, PC, 

 Defendant. 

BRUCE O. SCARBROUGH, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-14044 

v Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

NATIONWIDE CREDIT, INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER VACATING THE ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES, 

GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT MARY JANE ELLIOTT PC, 

RE-OPENING CASE NUMBER 1:14-CV-14044, AND 

DIRECTING THE CLERK TO COPY DOCKET ENTRIES 

 On October 8, 2014, Plaintiff Bruce Scarbrough filed suit against Defendant Mary Jane 

Elliott, P.C., asserting that Mary Jane Elliott, P.C. had violated the Federal Debt Collection 

Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a). On November 4, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge 

Patricia Morris consolidated the case against Mary Jane Elliott, P.C. (14-13896) with Plaintiff’s 

case against Defendant Nationwide Credit (14-14044) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 42(a). Both cases then proceeded under case number 14-13896, as provided by 

Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 42.1(c). 

1:14-cv-13896-TLL-PTM Doc # 20 Filed 12/31/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 106
- 2 - 

 On December 11, 2014, Plaintiff and Defendant Mary Jane Elliott, P.C. filed a joint 

motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Mary Jane Elliott, P.C. only. 

In light of Defendant Mary Jane Elliott, P.C.’s proposed dismissal, consolidation of the 

cases is no longer appropriate. Judicial resources would be better preserved by vacating the 

earlier order to consolidate the cases, and no issues of prejudice or confusion would arise by 

separating the cases. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the November 4, 2014 Order to Consolidate (ECF No. 

7) is VACATED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Bruce Scarbrough and Defendant Mary Jane M. 

Elliot P.C.’s Joint Motion to Dismiss as to Mary Jane M. Elliott, PC Only (ECF No. 17) is 

GRANTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Bruce Scarbrough’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) and all claims 

in case number 14-13896 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Mary Jane M. 

Elliot, PC only. 

It is further ORDERED that case number 1:14-cv-14044 is REOPENED. 

 It is further ORDERED that the clerk is DIRECTED TO COPY the following docket 

entries onto the docket of case 1:14-14044: ECF Nos. 9-16, 18, and 19. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: December 31, 2014 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on December 31, 2014. 

 s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

 TRACY A. JACOBS 

1:14-cv-13896-TLL-PTM Doc # 20 Filed 12/31/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 107
#### § 111.33-7 Alarms and shutdowns.

Each power semiconductor converter must have a high temperature alarm or shutdown, except as provided in § 111.33-11.

[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16362, Mar. 16, 2023]
# C_2008038EN.01001901.xml

| 12.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/19

---

Corrigendum to State aid — Italy — State aid C 37/07 (ex NN 36/07) — Alleged State aid granted to and by Alghero airport in favour of Ryanair and other air carriers — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 12 of 17 January 2008
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 12 of 17 January 2008

(2008/C 38/08)

On page 13, in points 49 and 51:

for:

‘[tra 70 000 e 80 000]’,

read:

‘[tra 7 000 000 e 8 500 000]’.

---
#### § 141.230 Readiness.

The master must ensure that all lifesaving equipment is properly maintained and ready for use at all times.
# Senate Floor Activity - Monday, February 3, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Monday, February  3)

H.R. 2642

 20

S. 376

 S.Amdt. 2713

S. 1950

S.Res. 340

S.Res. 341

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00 244

- CR IN RE Ernest HASTINGS Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On March 30, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his pro se motion to dismiss appointed counsel. However, in order to be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a non

- discretionary act; (2) was asked to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to do

so. In re Molina , 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). When a properly filed motion is pending before a trial court, the act of giving consideration to and ruling upon that motion is ministerial, and mandamus may issue to compel the trial judge to act. See Safety

- Kleen Corp. v. Garcia , 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). However, mandamus will not issue unless the record indicates that a properly filed

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- CR

- 7940 , styled State of Texas v. Ernest Hastings , i n the 437 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding.04

- 11

- 00244

- CR

- 2

- motion has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. Relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petiti on [ ] a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”); see also T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Here, rela tor has not provided this court with a file stamped copy of his motion or any other documents to show that a properly filed motion is pending before the trial court and has been brought to the trial court’s attention. Additionally, relator asserts he file d his motion to dismiss appointed counsel on March 28, 2011, just two days before relator’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed in this court. Relator has failed to meet his burden that a properly filed motion has awaited disposition for an unreasonab le amount of time. See id. Based on the foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a). Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P . 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.
PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
§ 75.334 Bonding requirements. For construction or facility improvement contracts or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity may accept the bonding policy and requirements of the non-Federal entity provided that the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity has made a determination that the Federal interest is adequately protected. If such a determination has not been made, the minimum requirements must be as follows: ( a ) A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent of the bid price. The “bid guarantee” must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will, upon acceptance of the bid, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.
( b ) A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “performance bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor's obligations under such contract.
( c ) A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “payment bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.
( d ) Where bonds are required in the situations described herein, the bonds shall be obtained from companies holding certificates of authority as acceptable sureties pursuant to 31 CFR part 223.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rings To Dine For, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Patricia Greenfield, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 13, 2006

                                        By: /s/  Patricia Greenfield
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Patricia Greenfield
                                            President
EXHIBIT 31.01A

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Bret C. Griess, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of CSG Systems International, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  | August 29, 2016 |   | /s/ Bret C. Griess                    |
|--------|-----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |            |   | Bret C. Griess                        |
|   |            |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
                COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                    (dollars in thousands, except ratio's)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION> 
                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                         ----------------------------------------------------------
                                          1993          1994        1995          1996        1997
                                         ------        ------      ------        ------      ------ 
<S>                                      <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>         <C> 
 
Net income (loss) before taxes           $20,831       $4,539      $(3,222)      $ 3,168     $(16,903)
Interest expense                           2,362        3,869        5,409        14,275       15,939
                                         -------       ------      -------       -------     --------
 Earnings before fixed charges            23,193        8,408        2,187        17,443         (964)
                                         =======       ======      =======       =======     ========
 
Preferred dividends                            -            -            -         2,129        3,346
Ratio of pretax income to net income        1.54         1.54         1.54          0.89         1.00
                                         -------       ------      -------       -------     --------
Preferred dividend factor                      -            -            -         1,895        3,346
 
Fixed charges:
Interest expense                           2,362        3,869        5,409        14,275       15,939
Preferred dividend factor                      -            -            -         1,895        3,346
                                         -------       ------      -------       -------     --------
Total fixed charges and preferred          2,362        3,869        5,409        16,170       19,285
 dividend                                =======       ======      =======       =======     ========
 
Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred dividends      9.82         2.17         0.40          1.08        (0.05)
                                         =======       ======      =======       =======     ========
</TABLE>
21stCentury Holding Company

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
  OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, James G. Jennings III,
  certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
  quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 21stCentury Holding Company;

2. Based on my knowledge,
  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
  or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
  of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
  respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge,
  the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
  of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
  in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other
  certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
  for the registrant and we have:

> a) designed such disclosure
>     controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures
>     to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
>     relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
>     known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
>     in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
>   b) evaluated the effectiveness
>     of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
>     quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
>     controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
>     report based on such evaluations; and
>   c) disclosed in this quarterly
>     report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
>     reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
>     that was materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
>     the registrants control over financial reporting; and;

5. The registrants other
  certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
  of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
  the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
  the equivalent functions):

> a) all significant deficiencies
>     and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
>     financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
>     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
>   b) any fraud, whether
>     or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
>     role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: August
      16, 2004.
|----------------------------

|/s/ James G.
      Jennings, IIIChief
      Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------



|34
|--
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Goodman,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of CE
Casecnan Water and Energy Company,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2002  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:   March 28, 2003




                                      /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
                                      -------------------------
                                      Patrick J. Goodman
                                      Senior Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      (chief financial officer)
§ 12.703 General requirements for entry-level ratings. ( a ) Rating endorsements will be issued without professional examination to applicants in capacities other than able seaman, lifeboatman, lifeboatman-limited, tankerman, or QMED, including— ( 1 ) Ordinary seaman;
( 2 ) Wiper;
( 3 ) Steward's department; and
( 4 ) Steward's department (F.H.).
( b ) Holders of MMCs or MMDs endorsed as ordinary seaman may serve in any unqualified rating in the deck or steward's department, except as a food handler.
( c ) Holders of MMCs or MMDs endorsed as wiper may serve in any unqualified rating in the engine or steward's department, except as a food handler.
( d ) Only MMCs or MMDs endorsed as steward's department (F.H.) will authorize the holder's service in any capacity in the steward's department, including food handler.
#### Veazey *v.*Mayor and Council of Crawfordville.

Submitted July 16,

Decided July 27, 1906.

Cobb, P. J.

1. The filing of the bond, or making of the pauper affidavit, required under the act approved December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105), relating to a certiorari sued out to review the judgment of a municipal court is a condition precedent to the application for certiorari; and a distinct averment in the petition for certiorari that the bond has been filed or the affidavit made is essential to the validity of the petition. *Johns*v. *Tifton,*122 *Ga.*734.

2. The failure to aver in the petition for certiorari that the bond has been filed or the affidavit made renders the petition void; and when the certiorari is dismissed for this reason, a second petition, sued out within six months from such dismissal but more than thirty days from the judgment complained of, should be dismissed. *Citizens Banking Co.*v. *Paris,*119 *Ga.*517; *Hill*v. *State,*115 *Ga.*833; *Hamilton*v. *Insurance Co.,*111 *Ga.*875.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*

*90Certiorari. Before Judge Holdeu. Taliaferro superior court. March 3, 1906.

*J. A'. Beazley,*for plaintiff in error. *Hawes*Cloud, contra.