999 EStreet NW Washington DC 20463 Volume 13, Number

8 FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES

7 INDEX

COURT CASES

6 Spannaus v. FEC

6 Stark v. FEC

6 New Litigation

800 LINE

4 Single-Candidate Committees

PUBLIC FUNDING

3 Candidates Eligible

3 "Kemp Forum" Contributions Not Matchabl

3 LaRouche Campaign Repayment

1 ADVISORY OPINIONS

PUBLICAnONS

2 New Bibliography Available

2 Conferences

TABLE OF CONTENTS

continu

3 Public Appearances

in-kind contribution of publie opinion poll resul

11 CFR l06.4(e).

If W&A were to extend credit to Mr. Will

or Ms. Arnold on terms which differed from t

terms available to other clients in the ordina

course of business, or if W&A were to charge M

Willard or Ms. Arnold less than the usual a

normal charge for the services provided, W&

could violate the election law by making a proh

ited corporate contribution to the recipient ca

didate. See 2 U.S.C. §44Ib(a); 11 CFR IOO.7

(l)(iii)(b), 114.4(a)(1) and 11 CFR 114.10.

W&A proposes the federal election poll

activity, at least in part, to create "goodwi

This intent, however, does not alter the nature 

the election-influencing activity or the appli

tion of the Act and Commission Regulations 

the activity. See AO 1986-30. (Date issu

August 21, 1987; Length: 3 pages)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

October 1987

ADVISORY OPINIONS: SUMMARIBS

An Advisory Opinion (AO) issued by the Commission provides guidance with regard to the

specific situation described in the AOR. Any

qualified person who has requested an AD and

acts in accordance with the opinion will not be

subject to any sanctions under the Act. Other

persons may rely on the opinion if they are

involved in a specific activity which is indistinguishable in all material aspects from the activity

discussed in the AO. Those seeking guidance for

their own activity, however, should consult the

full text of an AO and not rely only on the

summary given here.

AO 1987-22: Polling Data Provided

to Federal Candidates by

Corporate Polling Firm

Michael Willard and Linda Arnold may provide

candidates with the results of a poll conducted by

their public relations firm, Willard &. Arnold Communications, Inc. (W&.A), provided that:

o Mr. Willard or Ms. Arnold reimburses W&A for

the costs at the usual and normal rate and

o W&A extends credit to Mr. Willard and Ms.

Arnold on the same terms as those extended to

other clients in the ordinary course of business.

Under the proposal approved by the Commission,

W&A would include questions about federal candidates in polls which were conducted for nonpolitical clients, and the poll results would be provided

to candidates or potential candidates before the

results were made public. Mr. Willard or Ms.

Arnold would reimburse W&A for the cost of the

political questions.

Candidates who accepted the poll results

would be receiving in-kind contributions (see 11

CFR l06.4(b», subject to the contribution limitations of 2 U.S.C. §441a(a)(l)(A).

As contributors of poll results, Mr. Willard

and Ms. Arnold would have to maintain records

supporting each in-kind contribution and inform

recipient candidates of the value of each contribution. 11 CPR 106.4(h). Com mission Regulations

, provide methods for determining the amount of an
2

The Record is published by the Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, N.W., Washington,

D.C. 20463. Commissioners are: Scott E. Thomas, Chairman; Thomas J. Josefiak, Vice Chairman;

Joan Aikens' Lee Ann Elliott; Danny Lee McDonald; John Warren McGarry; Walter J. Stewart,

Secretary or'the Senate, Ex Officio; Donnald K. Anderson, CIerI< of the House of Representativ.es,

Ex Officio. For more information, call 202/376-3120 or toll-free 800/424-9530. (TDD For Hearmg

Impaired 202/376-3136)

Conference Schedule

\blurne 13, Numte

Madison, Wisconsin

FEC and Wisconsin

State Election Board

October 15-16 *

"'The first day of the conference is for

registration and, in some cases, a reception.

November 15-17* Austin, Texas

FEC and Texas

Secretary of State

CONFERENCE SERIES REMINDER

The FEe's fall conferences on campaign finance laws are proceeding on

schedule. For more information, contact

the FEC's Information Services Division at:

202/376-3120 or toll-free 800/424-9530.

NEW BmLIOGRAPHY AVAILABLE

Campaign Finance and Federal Elections

selected bibliography with annotations, is n

available from the FEC's Public Records Off

The 82-page bibliography, compiled by the s

of the Commission's Law Library, costs $4.00.

The bibliography organizes written mater

into four categories:

o Selected legislative history materials on 

Federal Election Campaign Act and its ame

ments;

o Books, monographs and treatises;

o Guidebooks, handbooks, compilations, bibl

raphies and indices; and

o Articles from law reviews, political scie

publications and business and general peri

cals.

To order a copy, call the Public Reco

Office: 202/376-3140 or 800/424-9530.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

AO 1987-25: VolWlteer Services Conducted

by Foreign National

Ricardo A. Otaola, a Venezuelan citizen who is a

student in the United States, may volunteer his

services, without compensation, on behalf of a

1988 Presidential campaign.

Under the Act, a foreign national is prohibited from making a "contribution of money or other

thing of value•••in connection with an election to

any political office••••tt 2 U.S.C. §44Ie. Uncompensated volunteer services conducted by individuals, however, are specifically exempt from

the definition of "contribution." 2 U.S.C. §431

(8)(B)(0. Therefore, Mr. Otaola's work as a volunteer in a Presidential campaign would not result

in a contribution to the candidate's campaign.

See AOs 1984-43 and 1982-31.

The Commission considered the extent to

which this conclusion conflicts with Advisory

Opinion 1981-51 and, by a vote of 2-4, declined to

supersede or overrule AO 1981-51. (Date issued:

September 17, 1987; Length: 3 pages)

Ctioter1987

AO 1987-24: Incorporated Hotel Chain

May Provide Complimentary

Items To Federal Candidates

The Hyatt Corporation (Hyatt), a hotel chain, may

offer complimentary items (including discounted

or complimentary rooms, flowers, food, beverages

and other amenities) to federal candidates, provided that the complimentary items are offered

to both political and nonpolitical clients on the

same terms and conditions.

Under the Act and Commission Regulations,

goods and services provided by corporations to

political committees and candidates are viewed as

prohibited corporate contributions if the goods

and services are provided at less than the usual

and normal charge. 11 CFR 100.7(a)(I)(iii); see

also AOs 1986-22 and 1985-28. Because Hyatt

proposes to provide its complimentary items to

political candidates and committees on the same

terms and conditions as it does to nonpolitical

clients, Hyatt would be viewed as providing goods

and services to the candidates and committees at

the usual and normal charge. (Date issued:

September 10, 1987; Length: 2 pages)
Octoter1987 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

GORE, DU PONT, DUKAKJS DECLARED

ELIGWLE FOR PRIMARY MATCHING FUNDS

On July 14, 1987, the Commission declared

U.S. Senator Albert Gore eligible to receive federal matching funds in his bid for the 1988 Democratic nomination for President. On August 24,

1987, former Governor Pete du Pont who is

seeking the Republican Presidential no:nination

was declared eligible. On September 9, 1987:

Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis was also

declared eligible in his bid for the Democratic

nomination.

To become eligible for matching funds a

candidate must raise over $100,000 by collecting

more than $5,000 in 20 different states in

amounts no greater than $250 from any individual.

Presidential candidates have been able to seek

eligibility for primary matching funds since January 1, 1987. Actual payments will not be made

however, until after January 1, 1988. '

!he ~aximu~ amount of matching funds a

Presidential candidate may receive is half of the

ov.e~all spending limit established by law ($10

r:lll~lOn, plus a cost-of-living adjustment). The

limit may be as high as $22 million in 1988 in

which case each candidate could qualify for 'approximately $11 million in federal funds.

THE LaROUCHE CAMPAIGN:

FINAL REPAYMENT DETERMINATION

On August 20, 1987, the Federal Election

Commission determined that Lyndon H. LaRouche

and The LaRouche Campaign were not required to

make a repayment of federal funds under 26

U.S.C. §9038(b)(2) and 11 CF R 9038.2(b) (2) with

respect to Mr. LaRouche's campaign for the 1984

Democratic Presidential nomination.

On October 17, 1985, the Commission had

made an initial determination that The-Laftouche

Campaign must repay $54,607.65 to the Secretary

of the Treasury. The final repayment determination, however, found that, because The LaRouche

Campaign had presumably used the federal funds

forquali.fied campaign expenses, no repayment

was required,

Copies of The LaRouche Campaign's final

repayment determination may be obtained from

the Commission's Public Records Office. Call

800/424-9530 or, locally, 376-3140.

3

Volume 13, Numb3r 

CONTRIBUTIONS TO ftKEMP FORUM"

NOT MATCHABLE

On August 18, 1987, the Commission made 

initial determination that the Jack Kemp f

President Committee (the Committee) is not e

titled to primary matching funds for contributio

made payable to "The Kemp Forum." The init

determination was made in accordance with t

Commission's Regulations at 11 CFR 9034.2(c).

The Regulations specify that matchable co

tributions must be written instruments made l

the order of, or specifically endorsed witho

qualification to, the presidential candidate or h

or her authorized committee." 11 CFR 9034.2(C

The Commission's Guideline for Presentation 

Good Order, at Exception Code A-5 provides 

written instrument made payable 'to an ent

other than the candidate or an authorized co

mittee•.•is nonmatchable unless the payee nam

represents the name of a function sponsored a

authorized by the candidate/committee and 

70PY of the solicitation material to the event 

included with the submission." In its review 

the solicitation materials, the Commission fou

no evidence indicating that the Kemp Forum w

a .function sponsored and authorized by the Co

mittee or by the candidate himself as a Pre

dential candidate.

Within 30 days after receiving the Comm

sion's. initial deterrnlnation, the Committee m

submit legal or factual material to demonstra

that the contributions are matchable. 11 CF

9036.5.

PUBLIC APPEARANCES

10/8-9 Georgetown University

Law Center and

District of Columbia Bar

Washington, D.C.

Chairman Scott E. Thomas

Vice Chairman Thomas J.

Josefiak

Lawrence Noble, Acting General

Counsel

10/26 Washington Public

Disclosure Commission

Olympia, Washington

Chairman Scott E. Thomas
Odcber 1987 FEDERAL ELECTION COMrvllSSION

SINGLE-CANDIDATE COMMITTEES

This article responds to questions received by

the Commission concerning unauthorized political

committees which support only one candidate for

federal office.

Please note that this article does not pertain

to Presidential delegate committees-committees

which may be committed to one candidate. For

guidance, delegate committees should consult 11

CFR 102.14(b)(l) and 110.14 and Advisory Opinion

1987-15, summarized in the September 1987 Record. Please note also that the Commission has

recently approved revisions to its delegate regulations at 110.14.

Definition

What is an unauthorized single-candidate

committee? An unauthorized single-candidate

committee is a registered political committee

which makes or receives contributions, or makes

expenditures, on behalf of only one candidate and

which has not been authorized by any candidate.

How does it differ from an authorized candidate committee? An authorized candidate committee is officially designated by the candidate as

part of his or her campaign organization. (The

candidate designates the committee on FEC Form

2, the Statement of Candidacy, or in a letter

containing the same Inf'orrnation.) II CFR lOLf,

By contrast, an unauthorized single-candidate

committee has no official status in the candidate's campaign organization. (In fact, the candidate may formally disavow the unauthorized committee's efforts if the FEe notifies the candidate

that the committee has raised or spent over

$5,000 on his or her behalf. 11 CFR 100.3(a)(3).)

Name of Committee

May an unauthorized single--candidate committee use the name of the candidate it supports

in the committee's title? No, it may not use the

name of any candidate in its title. 11 CFR 102.14

(a).

Contributions Received and

Support of Candidate

Do contributions to an unauthorized singlecandidate committee count against the donors'

contribution limits for the candidate the committee supports? Yes. When a person gives to a

committee knowing that a "substantial portion" of

4

Vblume 13, Numl:x3

the contribution "will be contributed to, or 

pended on behalf of," a specific candidate, 

donor's contribution counts against the per-e

tion limit for that candidate. 11 CFR 11O. I

Therefore, contributions to a single-candid

committee and to the authorized committee 

the candidate it supports are subject to the sa

contribution limit.

For example, with regard to the primary

an individual gives Candidate Smith's authori

committee $500, the individual may only con

bute up to $500 to an unauthorized single-can

date committee established to support Smi

candidacy. See also AO 1984-2. A person who 

contributed the maximum lawful amount to 

authorized candidate committee may not m

any contributions for the same election to 

unauthorized single-candidate com rnittee supp

ing the same candidate.

How much money may an unauthorized 

gle-eandidate committee contribute to the can

date it supports? It may contribute up to $1,

per election. 11 CFR IIO.l(b)(I).

May an unauthorized sing1e-candidate co

mittee also make independent expenditures ad

cating the candidate's election? Yes, the comm

tee may make unlimited independent expenditu

as long as they are independent; they must no

made with the cooperation or prior consent of

in consultation with, or at the request or sugg

tion of, the candidate or his/her authorized c

mittees or agents. Expenditures that do 

qualify as independent are considered contri

tions to the candidate and are therefore sub

to the contribution limits. 11 CFR 109.l(a) 

(c).

If an unauthorized single-candidate comm

tee makes independent expenditures on behal

the candidate, do contributions to the commi

still count against the donors' contribution lim

for the candidate? Yes. 11 CFR ltO.I(h)(2). 

also the Commission's response to AOR 1976-2

Reporting

What reporting form does an unauthori

single-eandidate committee use? The commi

uses FEC Form 3X, the form used by all unauth

ized committees.

Where does an unauthorized single-candid

committee file its reports? The committee f

its reports with one of the following fed

government offices: 

o A single-candidate committee supporting a c

didate for the House of Representatives f

with the Clerk of the House, Office of Reco
Octooor1987 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

and Registration, 1036 Longworth House Office

Building, Washington, D.C. 20515-6612. 11

CPR 104.4(c)(3) and 105.1.

o A single-candidate committee supporting a Senate candidate files with the Secretary of the

Senate, Office of Public Records, 232 Hart

Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C.

20510-7716. 11 CFR 104.4(c)(2) and 105.2.

o A single-candidate committee supporting a

Presidential candidate files with the FEC, 999

E Street, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20463. 11

. CPR 105.4.

Do committees also have to file copies of

their reports with the states? Yes. Committees

must simultaneously file with the appropriate

state government. The committee files a copy of

the portion of the report which applies to the

candidate (e.g., the Form 3X Summary Page and

any supporting schedules which itemize contributions to the committee and expenditures on behalf

of the candidate). A single-candidate com mittee

supporting a House or Senate candidate files with

the Secretary of State (or other designated state

officer) in the state in which the candidate seeks

election. 2 U.S.C. 5439(a)(2)(8); 11 CFR 104.4(c)

(2) and (3).

A single-candidate committee supporting a

Presidential candidate files in the state(s) in

which the committee and the Presidential

committee have their respective headquarters. 2

U.S.C. §439(a)(2)(A); 11 CFR 108.4. However, in

the case of independent expenditures, the singlecandidate committee files in the state where the

expenditure was made. 11 CFR 104.4(c)(1).

Supporting More Than One Candidate

What is the effect on an unauthorized singlecandidate committee if it begins to support other

candidates as well? The committee would no longer be a single-candidate committee and would

have to amend its Statement of Organization

(FEC Form 1) accordingly. It would be eligible to

receive up to $5,000 per calendar year in contributions from a single donor. II CFR 1l0.I(d). Its

contributions to a candidate would still be limited

to $1,000 per election unless it qualified as a

multicandidate committee (see below).

Remember, however, that when a person

gives to a committee knowing that a "substantial

portion" of the contribution "will be contributed

to, or expended on behalf of," a specific candidate, the donor's contribution counts against the

per-election limit for that candidate. 11 CFR

110.l(h).

5

Volume 13, Numte

May an unauthorized single-candidate 

mittee change its status to a qualified multic

date committee? Yes, once it has been regis

as a political committee for at least 6 mo

has received contributions from over 50 pe

and has contributed to at least 5 candidate

federal office. II CFR 100.5(e)(3). Once it s

fies these requirements for multicandidate st

the committee may contribute up to $5,000 

election to a candidate. II CFR 1l0.2(b)(I). 

committee must show, on its next report, th

has qualified as a multicandidate committe

checking the appropriate box on the Form 

Summary Page.

CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Registered political committees ar

automatically sent the Record. Any chang

of address by a registered committee mus

by law, be made in writing as an amend

ment to FEC Form I (Statement of Organ

zation) and filed with the Clerk of th

House, the Secretary of the Senate, or th

FEC, as appropriate.

Record subscribers (who are not polit

cal committees), when calling or mailing 

a change of address, are asked to provid

the following information:

1. Name of person to whom the Record 

sent.

2. Old address.

3. New address.

4. SUbscription number. The SUbscriptio

number is located in the upper le

hand corner of the mailing label. 

consists of three letters and five num

bers. Without this number, there is n

guarantee that your SUbscription ca

be located on the computer.
Octoter1987 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

SPANNAUS v: FEe

On March 3, 1987, in CA No. 86-6219, the

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

affirmed the District Court's judgment in

Spannaus v. FEC. (For a summary of the District

Court's ruling, see p. 6 of the October 1986

Record.)

CONGRESSMAN STARK v, FEe (Suit One)

On August 20, 1987, the U.S. District Court

for the District of Columbia issued an order

dismissing with prejudice the plaintiff's complaint

in Congressman Stark v. FEC, et al., Civil Action

No. 87-1024. The court observed that the action

was now moot. For a summary of Congressman

Stark's complaint, see p, 6 of the June 1987

Record (see also p, 8 of the September 1987

Record).

NEW LITIGATION

FEC v. Committee to Elect

Bennie o. Batts

The Commission asks the district court to

declare that the Committee to Elect Bennie O.

Batts (the Committee), the principal campaign

committee for Mr. Batts' 1984 congressional campaign, and Evelyn Batts, acting as the Committee's treasurer, violated the election law by:

o Failing to amend the Committee's Statement of

Organization to reflect that Evelyn Batts was

the Committee's treasurer, in violation of 2

U.S.C. S433(c);

o Commingling funds of the Committee with personal funds of Evelyn Batts in Mrs. Batts'

checking account, in violation of 2 U.S.C.

§432(b)(3);

o Depositing receipts into and making disbursements from an account other than the Committee's designated campaign depository, in violation of 2 U.S.C. S432(h)(l); and

o Knowingly accepting contributions from Evelyn

Batts which aggregated over $1,000 in connection with the primary election, in violation of 2

U.S.C. §44la(f).

The Commission also asks the court to declare that Evelyn Batts violated 2 U.S.C. §441a

(a)(l)(A) by making contributions to the Committee aggregating over $1,000 for the primary election.

6

Volume 13, Numter 1

The Commission further asks the court to:

o Permanently enjoin the defendants from furth

violations of the election law and

o Assess against the defendants a civil penalty 

the greater of $5,000 or the total amou

involved in all of the violations, pursuant to 

U.S.C. S437g(a)(6)(B).

U.S. District Court for the Southern Distri

of New York, Civil Action No. 87 CIV 578

August 7, 1987.

Common Cause v, FEe (Suit Eight)

Pursuant to 2 U.S.C. §437g(a)(8)(a), Commo

Cause asks the court to declare that the FE

acted contrary to law by failing to act, within 1

days, on an administrative complaint which Com

mon Cause filed with the Commission on Octob

28, 1986. Common Cause further asks the cou

to direct the FEC to proceed in conformity wi

the provisions of 2 U.S.C. §437g within 30 days.

Common Cause states that its administrativ

complaint alleged that the National Republic

Senatorial Committee (NRSC) had violated th

election law by making contributions to Repub

can Senatorial candidates in excess of the limi

contained in 2 U.S.C. §441a(h).

U.S. District Court for the District 

Columbia, Civil Action No. 87-2224, August 1

1987.

FEe v; National Organization for Women

Pursuant to 2 U.S.C. §437g(a)(6)(A)J the Com

mission asks the court to declare that th

National Organization for Women (NOW), a no

profit corporation, violated Section 44lb(a) of th

election law by financing letters sent to th

general public, during the 1984 election cycl

which contained communications in connectio

with various federal elections (Including, amon

others, the reelection campaigns of Senato

Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond).

The Commission also asks the court to:

o Assess, as a civil penalty, the greater of eith

$5,000 or the amount involved in the violatio

and

o Permanently enjoin NOW from similar futu

violations of the election law.

U.S. District Court for the District 

Columbia, Civil Action No. 87-2269, August 1

1987.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Qjooor1987

This cumulative index lists advisory opinions,

court cases and 800 Line articles published in the

Record during 1987. The first number in the

citation refers to the "number" (month) of the

Record issue; the second number, following the

colon, indicates the page number in that issue.

OPINIONS

1986-37: Presidential candidate appearances at

convention of nonprofit corporation, 1:6

1986-38: Individual's financing of media ads to

promote conservative candidates, 1:7

1986-39: Excess campaign funds used to establish

trust fund for minor, 2:3

1986-40: Corporate donations to state party

committee's building fund, 2:3

1986-41: Trade association's plan to compensate

employees who make contributions, 2:4

1986-42: Effect of corporate reorganization on

PACs, 3:4

1986-44: Contributions to PAC matched with corporate donations to charity, 3:4

1986-45: Interest payments by his committee to

candidate, 4:4

1987-1: Campaign's compensation of lost wages to

candidate prohibited, 4:5

1987-2: Campaign's purchase of car for candidate's reelection and official duties, 4:5

1987-3: Refund for terminated Presidential earnpaign, 4:6

1987-4: Excess campaign funds transferred from

individual's 1986 to his 1984 campaign, 5:4

1987-5: Solicitability of membership organization's members, 5:5

1987-6: Trade association PAC's combined dues

payment/solicitation plan prohibited, 5:5

1987-7: Voter guides distributed to public by

nonprofit corporation, 6:3

1987-8: Multimedia presentation of Presidential

interviews and profiles, 6:4

1987-11: Use of excess campaign funds, 8:2

1987-12: Transfer of funds from state campaign

committee to federal campaign committee, 9:3

1987-13: Trade association's solicitation of contributions, 8:2

1987-14: National Bank's SSP supporting only

state and local candidates, 8:3

1987-15: Relationship between authorized Presidential committee and delegate committees, 9:4

7

'vbIume 13, Numtx

1987-16: Transfers from state campaign com

tee to federal campaign committee, 8:3

1987-17: Combined membership dues and co

bution on billing statement, 8:3

1987-18: PAC matches employee contribu

with commodity charitable donations, 8:4

1987-21: Effect of corporate reorganizatio

PAC and proposed new PAC, 9:4

1987-22: Polling data provided to federal c

dates by corporate polling firm, 10:1

1987-23: PAC's acceptance of contributions 

state committee, 9:5

1987-24: Incorporated hotel chain may pr

complimentary items to federal candidates, 

1987-25: Volunteer services conducted by fo

national, 10:2

COURT CASES

FEC v. _---,-_ -Americans for Jesse Jackson, 2:9; 8:9

-Bank One, 7:5

-Barry, 4:7

-Batts, Committee to Elect, 10:6

-Beatty for Congress, 3:6

-Citizens for the President t84, 6:6

-Citizens Party, 1:8; 2:8; 9:6

-Clark,2:8

-CRT, 9:8

-Dominelli, 3:5; 6:6

-Furgatch, 3:5; 6:6

-Haley, Ted, Committee, 5:6

-Halter and AIDS, 4:7

-MCFL,2:4

-NCPAC, 7:5

-NOW, 10:6

-Pryor for Congress, 6:6

-Robichaux, 2:9

-Rocha, 9:6

-Rose, Congressman, 2:7

-1984 Victory Fund, 3:6

v, FEC ---~C=o~m-m-on Cause, fourth suit, 2:6; fifth s

2:9; sixth suit, 9:6; eighth suit, 10:6

-Furgatch, second suit, 6:6

-Glenn Presidential Committee, 9:6

-Spannaus, 10:6

-Stark, Congressman, 6:6; 10:6; second s

9:8

800 LINE

After the election: winding down, 3:9

Personal financial reports, 5:7

Honoraria, 8:9

Reporting a new treasurer, 9:9

Single- candidate committees, 10:4
Octooor1987 FEDERAL ELECTION COrvlMISSION

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES

Copies of notices are available in the Public

Records Office.

Notice Title

1987-5 II CFR Parts 100, 102, 103, 104 and 110:

Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and Prohibitions: Contributions by

Persons and Multicandidate Political

Committees; Final Rules: Announcement

of Effective Date (52 Fed. Reg. 11l87,

April 8, 1987) -

1987-6 Rulemaking Petition: Notice of Availability; Re: Regulations on Partisan and

Nonpartisan Communications (52 Fed.

Reg. 16275, May 4, 1987) -

1987-7 Public Financing of Presidential Primary

and General Election Candidates; Final

Rules Transmitted to Congress (52 Fed.

Reg. 20864, June 3, 1987) -

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street,NW

Washington, D.C. 20463

Official Business

Volume 13, Numt:.er 

1987-8 Filing Dates for Connecticut Speci

Election (52 Fed. Reg. 2Il18, June 

1987) - 

1987-9 Public Records and the Freedom of I

formation Act: Interim Rules and R

quest for Comments (52 Fed. Re

23636, June 24, 1987) -

1987-10 II CPR Parts 106, 9001 through 900

9012 & 9031 through 9039: Public F

nancing of Presidential Primary a

General Election Candidates; Final Ru

Announcement of Effective Date a

Correction of Explanation and Justific

tion (52 Fed. Reg. 30904, August 1

1987)

1987-11 II CPR Parts 100 and lIO: Contributio

and Expenditures by Delegates to N

tional Nominating Conventions; Fin

Rules Transmitted to Congress (52 Fe

Reg. 35530, September 22, 1987) -

Bulk Rate Mail

Postage and Fees Paid

Federal Election Commission

Permit Number G-31