alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Michael R. Kallet, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Eric E.
    Stickels, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oneida
     Financial Corp. (the "Company"), each certify in his/her capacity as an
     officer of the Company that he/she has reviewed the Quarterly Report of
    the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 and that to
                         the best of his/her knowledge:

(7)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(8)   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


May 13, 2003                            /s/ Michael R. Kallet
------------                            ----------------------------------------
Date                                    President and Chief Executive Officer


May 13, 2003                            /s/ Eric E. Stickels
------------                            ----------------------------------------
Date                                    Executive Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PARRISH REDD,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-14340

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

v.

 

TERRANCE VAILS, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND

DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT AND CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint alleging copyright infringement in November 2014. 

The Court referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen for all

pretrial proceedings. On January 31, 2016, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motions, including

Plaintiff’s Fifth Motion for Default Judgment as to Chris Hugan and Mary Peters (Doc. No.

60), Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Default Judgment as to Terrance Vails (Doc. No. 65)

and Plaintiff’s Second Emergency Motion for Default Judgment as to Vails (Doc. No. 67).

In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that

objections to the R&R needed to be filed “within fourteen (14) days of service” and that a

party’s failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No. 72 at 4). 

No objection has been filed. 

The Court agree with the analysis and recommendations contained in the R&R. 

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations and DENIES

2:14-cv-14340-MOB-RSW Doc # 74 Filed 03/09/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 454
Plaintiff’s motions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 9, 2016 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective

email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on March 9, 2016.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14340-MOB-RSW Doc # 74 Filed 03/09/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 455
#### § 14.305 Entries in continuous discharge book.

If the merchant mariner holds a continuous discharge book, the master or individual in charge of the vessel must make the proper entries in it.

[CGD 94-004, 61 FR 56637, Nov. 4, 1996, as amended by USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77999, Dec. 24, 2013]
§ 120.390 Shore power. A vessel with an electrical system operating at more than 50 volts, which is provided with a means to connect to shore power, must meet the following: ( a ) A shore power connection box or receptacle must be permanently installed at a convenient location:
( b ) A cable connecting the shore power connection box or receptacle to the switchboard or main distribution panel must be permanently installed;
( c ) A circuit breaker must be provided at the switchboard or main distribution panel for the shore power connection; and
( d ) The circuit breaker, required by paragraph (c) of this section, must be interlocked with the vessel's power sources so that shore power and the vessel's power sources may not be operated simultaneously.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEJUAN THORNTON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-14118

Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

v.

COMERICA BANK,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On October 30, 2014, the Court issued an Order Granting Application to Proceed

In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Claim. The Court found that the allegations were

frivolous. See, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324-25 (1989). Plaintiff filed a motion

for reconsideration. The Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion.

Local Rule 7.1(h)(3) provides the Court's standard of review: 

Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant

motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely present the same issues

ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The

movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the

parties and other persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled

but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the

case.

Palpable defects are those which are "obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest or

plain." Mich. Dep't of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731, 734 (E.D. Mich. 2002). 

"It is an exception to the norm for the Court to grant a motion for reconsideration."

Maiberger v. City of Livonia, 724 F. Supp. 2d 759, 780 (E.D. Mich. 2010). "[A]bsent a

significant error that changes the outcome of a ruling on a motion, the Court will not

1

2:14-cv-14118-VAR-MJH Doc # 9 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 31
provide a party with an opportunity to relitigate issues already decided." Id.

Thornton has not demonstrated that the Court committed a palpable defect. As

before, Thornton fails to identify the law and authority that allows the Court to grant his

requested relief of a court order. Thornton says the Court has diversity jurisdiction over

this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because his alleged property is over $75,000.00;

however, it remains unclear whether jurisdiction exists because the Court does not

know what law Thornton uses to assert his rights. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

S/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: January 15, 2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record and DeJuan Thorton by electronic

means or U.S. Mail on January 15, 2015.

S/Carol A. Pinegar 

Deputy Clerk

2

2:14-cv-14118-VAR-MJH Doc # 9 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 32
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.110 Procedures followed after unloading. ( a ) After a material covered by this part has been unloaded from a vessel, each hold or cargo compartment must be thoroughly cleaned of all residue of such material unless the hold is to be reloaded with that same cargo.
( b ) When on U.S. territorial seas or inland waters, cargo associated wastes, cargo residue, and deck sweepings must be retained on the vessel and disposed of in accordance with 33 CFR parts 151.51 through 151.77.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 207 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 207

  To amend the National Guard Youth Challenge Program under title 32, 
United States Code, to exclude nondefense funds made available by other 
Federal agencies for the Program from the matching requirements of the 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

Mr. Wilson of South Carolina (for himself and Ms. Bordallo) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Guard Youth Challenge Program under title 32, 
United States Code, to exclude nondefense funds made available by other 
Federal agencies for the Program from the matching requirements of the 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FOR STATE PROGRAMS UNDER THE NATIONAL 
              GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE PROGRAM.

    (a) Federal Share of Costs of State Programs.--Subsection (d) of 
section 509 of title 32, United States Code, as amended by section 594 
of Public Law 110-417 (122 Stat. 4475), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Nondefense funds made available or transferred to the 
Secretary of Defense by other Federal agencies to support the Program 
shall not be subject to the matching-funds requirement imposed by 
paragraph (1).''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--For fiscal year 2010, there 
is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Defense 
$97,527,200 to carry out the National Guard Youth Challenge Program 
under section 509 of title 32, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011269EN.01003301.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administratif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 4 July 2011 — Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of FIM Santander Top 25 Euro Fi v Direction des résidents à l’étranger et des services généraux

(Case C-338/11)

2011/C 269/64

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Administratif de Montreuil

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of FIM Santander Top 25 Euro Fi

Applicant:

Defendant: Direction des résidents à l’étranger et des services généraux

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the situation of the shareholders be taken into account together with that of undertakings for collective investments in transferable securities (UCITS)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the situation of the shareholders be taken into account together with that of undertakings for collective investments in transferable securities (UCITS)?

| 2. | If so, what are the conditions under which the withholding tax at issue may be regarded as consistent with the principle of free movement of capital? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, what are the conditions under which the withholding tax at issue may be regarded as consistent with the principle of free movement of capital?

---
#### § 136.172 Temporary compliance for existing towing vessels.

An existing towing vessel subject to this subchapter will remain subject to Coast Guard regulations applicable to the vessel on July 19, 2016 until either July 20, 2018 or the date the vessel obtains a COI, whichever date is earlier.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3262

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Keelyn Morelle Stokes lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: February 12, 2024 Filed: February 15, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Keelyn Stokes served his 85-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm and commenced a three-year term of supervised release in February 2021. Supervised release was revoked and he was sentenced to time served in February 2023. In August, the probation office petitioned to revoke supervised release based on four new law violations, including charges of domestic battery and theft pendingin state court. At the revocation hearing, Stokes did not dispute the violations and the

parties jointly recommended a within-range revocation sentence of 13 months in prison followed by an additional 12 months of supervised release. See USSG § 7B1.4(a). The district court 1 revoked supervised release, accepted the joint recommendation, and imposed that sentence, which Stokes then appealed. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief arguing that the revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable. Stokes filed a supplemental prose brief raising additional issues. Upon careful review, we conclude that the withinrange sentence for a second supervised release revocation is not substantively unreasonable, and that the additional issues raised in the pro se supplemental brief are without merit. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Joseph Postbinder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Joseph Postbinder
Joseph PostbinderChief Executive Officer
November 2, 2005 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
21st Century Holding Company

EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Widdicombe,
Chief Executive Officer of 21st Century Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of 21st Century Holding Company.


By: /s/ Richard A. Widdicombe
   --------------------------------
   Richard A. Widdicombe,
   Chief Executive Officer


                                       38
§ 137.322 Classed vessels. ( a ) A drydock and internal structural examination performed for a towing vessel to maintain class by the American Bureau of Shipping in accordance with their rules, as appropriate for the intended service and routes, would count as an examination required under § 137.300.
( b ) A drydock and internal structural examination performed for a towing vessel to maintain class by a recognized classification society in accordance with their rules, as appropriate for the intended service and routes, would count as an examination required under § 137.300, provided the Coast Guard has accepted their applicable rules.
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dallas G. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Citizens First Financial Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: March 31, 2005      /s/ Dallas G. Smiley      Chief Financial Officer
SI0-l()()4()l-()() 2

VOK K COLLUG

L Th f City Uni\ersH y o t

Xc u ^'oi k l.initikTci , Neu ' Yor

k 1145 1 Tt'l ; 7) 8 262-282 9 CUN Y Aviatio n liislilut e iVfurc h N . 201 0 Ih e Honorabl e Raymon d 11 . l.alloo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportutio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke l DOT-OST-20IO-4iBf

c Dea r Mr . Secretary : Than k yo u to r th e opportunii ) to expres s m \suppor t lor th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t imniunii y an

d propose d join t

busines s agreemen

t ille d b y America

n Airline s and Japa

n Airlines . The propose d allianc e betuee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo r one-worl d t

o compet e effectively wit

h th e Sta r an d Sk y Tea malliance . Thi s increase d inter-allianc e competitio n wil l i

n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s oith e Department' s Open Skie s polic y - llrs i b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japan Open Skies , the n b y servin g a s afoundatio n fo r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athoroug h review , 1 encourag e the Departmen t o f Transportatio n t

o approv e thi s application , a s i

t woul d enabl e thes e one-worl d allianc e airline s to wor k closel y together

to delive r highly competitiv e air

iransportatioj i services , Approva l fo r AA/JAL allianc e will hav e apositiv e impac t

o n ai r trave l b y offerin g customer s mor

e service , schedulin g an

d pricin g option s and wil l help to ensure tha t customer s continu e t o benefi t fro mhavin g thre e competitiv e air

alliance s to choos e from . I urg e yo u t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerelv ,

Dr . Rober t Aceve s Director
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00442-CR

Randy Eugene Smith

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-08-7364

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 14, 2016
#### § 122.320 Steering gear, controls, and communication system tests.

The master of a vessel shall have examined and tested the steering gear, signaling whistle, propulsion controls, and communication systems of the vessel prior to getting underway for a voyage, except that such examination and testing need not be conducted more than once in any 24 hour period.
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 2 of 8 Pg ID 2
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 3 of 8 Pg ID 3
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 4 of 8 Pg ID 4
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 5 of 8 Pg ID 5
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 6 of 8 Pg ID 6
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 7 of 8 Pg ID 7
2:14-cr-20494-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 08/19/14 Pg 8 of 8 Pg ID 8
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1971 

To provide for the elimination of duties on certain comforter shells. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the elimination of duties on certain comforter 

shells. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DUTIES ON CERTAIN COM4 FORTER SHELLS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 503(b)(4) of the Trade 

6 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2463(b)(4)) is amended— 

7 (1) by amending the heading to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘CERTAIN HOUSEHOLD TEXTILE ARTICLES.—’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding paragraph 

10 (1)(A)’’ and inserting the following: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1971 IH

1 ‘‘(A) CERTAIN HAND-KNOTTED OR HAND2 WOVEN CARPETS.—Notwithstanding paragraph 

3 (1)(A)’’; and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN COMFORTER SHELLS.—Not6 withstanding paragraph (1)(A), the President 

7 may designate as an eligible article or articles 

8 under subsection (a) comforter shells of chief 

9 weight cotton that are classifiable under sub10 heading 6307.90.89 of the Harmonized Tariff 

11 Schedule of the United States.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

14 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

15 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS