alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008276EN.01007401.xml

| 31.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/74

---

Extract from the winding-up measure concerning Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA decided under Article 9 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

(2008/C 276/04)

SUSPENSION OF PAYMENTS

In its judgment of 9 October 2008 at 17.00, the District Court of Luxembourg, hearing commercial cases, ordered that the public limited company Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA, entered in the Commercial and Companies Register in Luxembourg under Section B, number 63997 and with its headquarters at 35a, avenue J.F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, be made subject to the suspension of payments procedure as provided for in Part IV of the law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, as amended, and declares Article 60.2(15) of this law to be applicable, according to which the written authorisation of the administrators is required for all acts and decisions concerning Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA, failing which they shall be considered void, and by virtue of which the administrators may submit any proposals they deem appropriate to the management bodies of Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA for debate. They may attend debates at the shareholders' general meeting and those of the administrative, managerial or supervisory bodies of Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA.

The same judgment appoints the limited company PricewaterhouseCoopers SARL as administrators, represented by Ms Emmanuelle Caruel-Henniaux and Mr Franz Fayot, lawyer, to monitor the management of the assets of Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA, and limits the suspension of payments procedure to six months.

The Financial Sector Supervisory Commission and Kaupthing Bank Luxembourg SA may lodge an appeal within 15 days of notification of the judgment, in accordance with paragraph 9 of Article 60.2 of the law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, as amended, namely following notification of the judgment by registered letter from the Registrar of the District Court of Luxembourg hearing commercial cases. The appeal shall be lodged by way of declaration to the Registrar.

This judgment may not be the subject of an application to set aside nor of third-party proceedings for a re-hearing.

Copy certified as correct,

The administrators

PricewaterhouseCoopers SARL, represented by Ms Emmanuelle Caruel-Henniaux and Mr Franz Fayot, lawyer

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

INTELLECTUAL WELLNESS, LLC, 

a Michigan Limited Liability Company,

 

 Plaintiff Case No. 5:14-cv-13717-JEL-RSW 

 Hon. Judith E. Levy 

v. 

 

IRONMAG LABS, LLC, 

a Nevada Limited Liability Company, 

 

Defendant 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Intellectual Wellness, LLC hereby 

dismisses with prejudice its complaint as to Defendant IronMag Labs, LLC 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Rule 

permits dismissal by the Plaintiff, without an order of court, by the filing of a 

notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or 

a motion for summary judgment. 

Dated: December 16, 2014 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C.

/s/ Steven Susser 

Steven Susser (P52940) 

Carlson Gaskey & Olds, P.C. 

400 W. Maple, Suite 350 

Birmingham, Michigan 48009 

 (248) 988-8360 

ssusser@cgolaw.com 

5:14-cv-13717-JEL-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 12/16/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 31
2 

BATOR LEGAL PC 

/s/ David G. Cain_____________ 

David G. Cain (P-33265) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

400 West Maple, Suite 200 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

 (248) 642-8120 

dgcain1955@sbcglobal.net 

5:14-cv-13717-JEL-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 12/16/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 32
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on December 16, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing 

paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to all attorneys of record. 

 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. 

By: /s/ Steven Susser 

 Steven Susser (P52940) 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 400 West Maple Road, Suite 350 

 Birmingham, Michigan 48009 

 248-988-8360 

 ssusser@cgolaw.com

Dated: December 16, 2014 

5:14-cv-13717-JEL-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 12/16/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 33
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Calvin H. Dodd, appellant.

Filed May 13, 1916.

No. 18770.

Per Curiam.

Contempt: Review. A conviction under contempt proceedings can only Be reviewed in the supreme court By the filing of a petition in error as in a criminal case. *Gandy v. State,*13 NeB. 445; *Hanilca v. State,*87 NeB. 845.

Appeal from tbe district court for Dawes county: William BO. Westover, Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Albert W. Grites*and *Earl McDowell,*for appellant.

*Justin E. Porter*and *Allen G. Fisher, contra.*
# 2020 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
# C_2008121EN.01001601.xml

| 17.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/16

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by Italy of the public service obligation in respect of the following scheduled air services: Trapani-Rome, Trapani-Milan, Trapani-Bari and Trapani-Cagliari

(2008/C 121/13)

In accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, the Italian Government has decided to modify the public service obligation in respect of the following scheduled air services: Trapani-Rome, Trapani-Milan, Trapani-Bari and Trapani-Cagliari, published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 150 of 28 June 2006, and amended in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 26 June 2007.

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with point 2.4(b) and (c) of the public service obligation, the fares are revised as follows:

| Route | Revised fare (excluding VAT) |
| --- | --- |
| Trapani-Rome or vice versa | EUR 63,31 |
| Trapani-Milan or vice versa | EUR 79,14 |
| Trapani-Bari or vice versa | EUR 52,76 |
| Trapani-Cagliari or vice versa | EUR 63,31 |

Route

Revised fare (excluding VAT)

Trapani-Rome or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 63,31

Trapani-Milan or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 79,14

Trapani-Bari or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 52,76

Trapani-Cagliari or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 63,31

The other requirements of the public service obligation published in OJ C 150 of 28 June 2006 remain unchanged.

---
§ 672.14 Scheduling the hearing. ( a ) When an answer is filed, the Hearing Clerk shall forward the complaint, the answer, and any other documents filed thus far in the proceeding to the Presiding Officer, who will notify the parties of his assignment.
( b ) *Notice of hearing.* If the respondent requests a hearing in his answer, or one is ordered by the Presiding Officer, the Presiding Officer shall serve upon the parties a notice setting forth a time and place for the hearing. The Presiding Officer may issue the notice of hearing at any appropriate time, but not later than twenty (20) days prior to the date set for the hearing.
( c ) *Postponement of hearing.* The Presiding Officer will not grant a request for postponement of a hearing except upon motion and for good cause shown.
§ 11.430 Endorsements for the Great Lakes and inland waters. ( a ) Any officer endorsement issued for service on Great Lakes and inland waters self-propelled vessels, excluding towing vessels, is valid on all of the inland waters of the United States as defined in § 10.107 of this subchapter.
( b ) Any officer endorsement issued for service on inland waters self-propelled vessels, excluding towing vessels, is valid for the inland waters of the United States, excluding the Great Lakes.
( c ) Any officer endorsement issued for service on inland waters or an inland route is valid for service on the sheltered waters of the Inside Passage between Puget Sound and Cape Spencer, Alaska.
( d ) Because these officer endorsements authorize service on waters seaward of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) demarcation lines, as defined in 33 CFR part 80, the applicant must complete an examination on the COLREGS or the endorsement will exclude such waters.
( e ) To obtain a master or mate endorsement with a tonnage limit of 200 GRT or more, whether an original, raise of grade, or increase in the scope of authority, the applicant must meet the training requirements in § 11.201(h) and (i) of this part and successfully complete radar observer training in § 11.480 of this part.
( f ) Figure 11.430(f) illustrates the deck officer endorsement structure, including crossover points, for Great Lakes and inland waters service. The section numbers on the diagram refer to the specific requirements applicable.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77909, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30882, June 28, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 16693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1704]



[[Page 16691]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part VII





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Executive Order 13428--Renaming a National Forest in the Commonwealth 
of Puerto Rico


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 4, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 16693]]

                Executive Order 13428 of April 2, 2007

                
Renaming a National Forest in the Commonwealth of 
                Puerto Rico

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 1 of the Act of June 4, 1897 
                (16 U.S.C. 473) and section 1 of the Act of July 1, 
                1902 (48 U.S.C. 746), and to rename the Caribbean 
                National Forest in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, it 
                is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. The Caribbean National Forest in the 
                Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby renamed the ``El 
                Yunque National Forest.''

                Sec. 2. Previous references to the Caribbean National 
                Forest in Executive Order 7059-A of June 4, 1935, and 
                Executive Order 10992 of February 9, 1962, shall, for 
                all purposes hereafter, be deemed references to the 
                ``El Yunque National Forest.''

                Sec. 3. This order shall be implemented in accordance 
                with applicable law and subject to the availability of 
                appropriations.

                Sec. 4. This order is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity by any party against 
                the United States, agencies, entities, officers, 
                employees, or agents thereof, or any other person.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    April 2, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-1704
Filed 4-3-07; 8:50 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 28, 2007, 9 a.m. to March 30, 2007, 12 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 26, 2007, 72 FR 8387-8389.                

The meeting will be held March 26, 2007 to March 27, 2007. The meeting time and location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: March 14, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1344 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1

Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim

Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:33 PM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: FW: FYI

From: Bivins, Dan 

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:05 AM 

To: John Cooper 

Cc: Garnett, Kim 

Subject: RE: FYI 

Here’s another one. Is this one true? Could you say a few sentences about how well it wokrd at Army? Any 

maintenance issues, etc.? 

Dan 

EPA’s statements that the U.S. Army has successfully installed and evaluated a multi-metals CEMS on one of 

its hazardous waste incinerators, and that a multi-metals CEMS is an acceptable option in the MATS rule 

(Statement of Basis at 24) are not correct. A hypertext search of the MATS rule did not show any reference to a 

multi-metals CEMS. Additionally, while it is correct that the U.S. Army purchased and installed three Xact 

units, none have ever been used for compliance with Subpart EEE.

From: John Cooper [mailto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:49 AM 

To: Bivins, Dan 

Subject: RE: FYI 

Dan, 

Hoping is nice but reality is sometimes different - it rained all day yesterday and is currently raining. 

I will have a response to the comment when you return on Tuesday. 

John 

From: Bivins, Dan [mailto:Bivins.Dan@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 7:00 AM 

To: John Cooper 

Subject: FYI 

Will be on furlough tomorrow and Monday is a holiday for us. Enjoy your weekend! Hope not raining now in Portland! 

Dan 

Dan Bivins 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Measurement Technology Group 

919-541-5244
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.23



Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”), is entered into as of May 28, 2019, by and between Mark Howell (the “Executive”) and ProPetro Holding Corp., a Texas corporation (together with any of its subsidiaries and Affiliates as may employ the Executive from time to time, and any successor(s) thereto, the Company”, and together with the Executive, the “Parties”).
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 17, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as hereinafter provided;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Employment Agreement, the Executive shall be entitled to perform his responsibilities and duties outside of Midland, Texas; provided that the Executive shall still be required to work from Midland, Texas as reasonably needed to serve the Company’s interests.
2.    None of the changes to the Employment Agreement or the Executive’s employment arrangement provided for herein constitute Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement).
3.    Except as modified by the foregoing, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
4.    This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
[Signature page follows]
 












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written.
PROPETRO HOLDING CORP.






By:     /s/ Dale Redman______________ 
 Name: Dale Redman
 Title: Chief Executive Officer






MARK HOWELL






/s/ Mark Howell______________


Signature Page to the
Amendment to Employment Agreement for Mark Howell
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.0

                              CONSENT OF BKD, LLP


                              [BKD,LLP LETTERHEAD]




                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Citizens First Financial Corp.

We have issued our report dated January 17, 2003 on the consolidated financial
statements of Citizens First Financial Corp. and Subsidiary appearing in the
Company's 2002 Annual Report to Stockholders. We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements of Citizens First Financial Corp. on
Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 333-79389, 333-37925 and 333-41615) and in
this Form 10-K of the aforementioned report.



BKD, LLP


Decatur, Illinois
March 27, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the President's Cancer Panel, February 12, 2007, 8 a.m. to February 12, 2007, 6 p.m., University of Mississippi, Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 11, 2007, 72 FR 1335.                 

Due to inclement weather, this meeting is amended to reschedule the closed session on February 12, 2007, 4 p.m.-6 p.m. to March 8, 2007, 11 a.m.-1 p.m. as a telephone conference. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: March 5, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1109 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 116.700 General requirements. ( a ) A crew accommodation space and a work space must be of sufficient size, adequate construction, and with suitable equipment to provide for the safe operation of the vessel and the protection and accommodation of the crew in a manner practicable for the size, facilities, service, route, speed, and modes of operation of the vessel.
( b ) The deck above a crew accommodation space must be located above the deepest load waterline.
- 2533
- 2534
- 2535
- 2536
- 2537
- 2538
- 2539
- 2540
- 2541
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-61092

Summary Calendar

JUAN CARLOS AJEATAS YAT,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A72 452 799

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Carlos Ajeatas Yat, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his application for

cancellation of removal pursuant to §203(b) of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and

Central American Relief Act (NACARA), Pub. L. No. 105-100, 111 Stat. 2160,

2198-99 (1997). Yat argues that the BIA erred in finding that he had not shown

sufficient hardship to warrant cancellation of removal.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 25, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-61092

2

Section 203 of NACARA amended § 309(f) of the Illegal Immigration

Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat.

3009, to establish rules to permit certain classes of aliens, including those from

Guatemala, to apply for cancellation of removal under what is titled the

“SPECIAL RULE FOR CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL.” 111 Stat. 2160,

2198-99. Pursuant to the “special rule,” eligible aliens may seek cancellation of

removal under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 240A (codified at 8

U.S.C. § 1229b). Id. To succeed, the applicant must show, inter alia, that (1) he

has been present in the United States for at least seven years immediately

preceding the date on which he filed his application, (2) he has been a person of

good moral character during that period, and (3) his removal would result in

extreme hardship to either himself or a qualifying relative. Id.

The application for cancellation of removal under the special rules applied

to certain Guatemalans under NACARA is subject to the jurisdiction-stripping

provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B). See NACARA § 203(b), 111 Stat. 2160,

2198-99. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the challenge to the BIA’s

denial of that form of discretionary relief. See Sung v. Keisler, 505 F.3d 372, 377

(5th Cir. 2007). However, § 1252(a)(2)(B) does not prevent this court from

considering constitutional claims or questions of law. See § 1252(a)(2)(D). While

attempting to couch his arguments as questions of law, Yat’s arguments boil

down to a dispute over the Immigration Judge’s weighing and finding of facts.

Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of Yat’s

application for cancellation of removal under NACARA § 203(b). See Sung, 505

F.3d at 377.

Yat’s petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.