alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 111.106-13 Cargo handling devices or cargo pump rooms handling flammable or combustible cargoes. ( a ) This section is applicable to enclosed areas containing devices handling flammable or combustible liquid cargoes with closed-cup flashpoints not exceeding 60 °C (140 °F).
( b ) Enclosed hazardous locations containing devices that handle cargoes must comply with Clauses 6.3.1.2 of API RP 500 and 6.6.1.2 of API RP 505 (incorporated by reference, see § 110.10-1). Ventilation must not be used to reduce the classification of such areas.
( c ) Cargo pump rooms must be isolated from all sources of vapor ignition by gastight bulkheads. The gastight bulkhead between the pump room and the pump-motor compartment may be pierced by fixed lights, drive shafts, and pump-engine control rods, provided that the shafts and rods are fitted with fixed oil reservoir gland seals, or pressure grease seals where they pass through the gastight bulkheads. Other types of positive pressure seals must be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG). Access to a cargo handling enclosed area or room must be from the open deck.
( d ) Fixed lights in cargo pump rooms or enclosed cargo handling areas must meet the arrangement and construction requirements in § 111.105-31(g) of this part.
( e ) A cargo handling area or pump room that precludes the lighting arrangement of paragraph (d) of this section, or where the lighting arrangement of paragraph (d) of this section does not give the required illumination level, must have explosion-proof, flameproof (Ex “d”) or flameproof-increased safety (Ex “de”) lighting fixtures.
#### § 131.555 Spare parts and repair equipment.

Spare parts and repair equipment must be provided for each lifesaving appliance and component that either is subject to excessive wear or consumption or needs to be replaced regularly. These parts and equipment must be kept aboard the OSV, except that, if the vessel operates daily out of the same shore base, they may be kept at that base.
#### § 128.210 Class II vital systems—materials.

Except as provided by §§ 128.230 and 128.240 of this subpart, instead of complying with part 56 of this chapter, materials used in Class II vital piping-systems may be accepted by the cognizant OCMI or the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, if shown to provide a level of safety equivalent to materials in subpart 56.60 of this chapter.
#### § 140.720 Navigation lights, shapes, and sound signals.

Each towing vessel must be equipped with navigation lights, shapes, and sound signals in accordance with the International Regulations for Prevention of Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) or 33 CFR part 84 as appropriate to its area of operation.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

     Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
M. Sharpe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.




                                      /s/ Kevin M. Sharpe
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Kevin M. Sharpe, Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


August 14, 2002
§ 900.301 Content. ( a ) An EA shall include brief discussions of the need for the proposal; of alternatives to the proposal as required by NEPA section 102(2)(E); and of the environmental impacts of the proposal and alternatives. The EA shall also include a listing of agencies and persons consulted in the preparation of the EA.
( b ) An EA may describe a broad range of alternatives and proposed mitigation measures to facilitate planning and decisionmaking.
( c ) The EA should also document compliance, to the extent possible, with all applicable environmental laws and Executive Orders, or provide reasonable assurance that those requirements can be met.
( d ) The EA should be a concise public document. The level of detail and depth of impact analysis will normally be limited to the minimum needed to determine the significance of potential environmental effects.
EX-35 (c)
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

MLM 2006-A04

I, Michael De Francesco, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable portion
thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.


Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Agreement.

Date: February 28, 2007


/s/ Michael De Francesco
Michael De Francesco
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: August 20, 2019 

Mr. Sanford P. Dumain 

Mr. Daniel Richard Karon 

Mr. Bryan Leitch 

Ms. Deanne E. Maynard 

Mr. Joseph R. Palmore 

Mr. Andrew J. McGuinness 

Ms. Elizabeth Anne McKenna 

Mr. Charles Slidders 

Ms. Jill Margaret Wheaton 

 Re: Case No. 17-2244, Joe Solo, et al v. United Parcel Service Co.

Originating Case No.: 2:14-cv-12719 

Dear Counsel, 

 The Court issued the enclosed Order today in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Briston S. Mitchell 

Case Manager 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7082 

cc: Mr. David J. Weaver 

Enclosure 

Case 2:14-cv-12719-DPH-RSW ECF No. 126 filed 08/20/19 PageID.2696 Page 1 of 2 Case: 17-2244 Document: 67-1 Filed: 08/20/2019 Page: 1 (1 of 2)
Case No. 17-2244 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ORDER

 

JOE SOLO; BLEACHTECH LLC, and all others similarly situated 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees 

v. 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO. 

 Defendant - Appellant 

 

 Upon consideration of the motion of Mr. Bryan Leitch to withdraw as counsel for the 

appellant, 

 It is ORDERED that the motion be and it hereby is GRANTED. The court will appoint 

new counsel to represent the appellant under the Criminal Justice Act. 

 

ENTERED PURSUANT TO RULE 45(a), 

RULES OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Issued: August 20, 2019 

___________________________________

Case 2:14-cv-12719-DPH-RSW ECF No. 126 filed 08/20/19 PageID.2697 Page 2 of 2 Case: 17-2244 Document: 67-2 Filed: 08/20/2019 Page: 1 (2 of 2)
Opinion issued August 2 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 2
- 00 246
- CR

——————————— HARRY MALONE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1338323

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury found a ppellant, Harry Malone , guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 30.02(a)( 1), (c)(2) (West 2011). Appellant then pleaded true to the allegations in two enhancement paragraphs, and2

the jury sentenced him to 3 5 years in prison. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 12.42(d) (West Supp. 2012). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. App ellant’ s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, along with a brief stating that the recor d presents no reversible error and the appeal is without merit and is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967)

. Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by pre senting a professional evaluation of the record and supplying us with references to the record and legal authority

. 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 ; see also High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978) . Counsel indicates that he has thoroughly reviewed the record and he is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant reversal. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State , 193 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.

— Houst on [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal , and we conclude that no reversible error exists in the record , there are no arguable grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous

. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at
1400 (e mphasizing that reviewing court

— and not counsel

— determines, after full examination of proceedings, whet her appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine whe ther arguable grounds for review exist); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,3

826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ( same); Mitchell , 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing court determines whether arguable grounds exist by reviewing entire record)

. We note that a n appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds for appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n. 6.
W e affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’ s motion to withdraw. 1 Attorney Melissa Martin must immediately send appellant the required notice and file a copy of th e notice with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 6.5(c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).

1 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson , 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Daddario, Chief Financial Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of The MONY Group Inc.





/s/ Richard Daddario


---

Richard Daddario


November 14, 2002
10913 Dee Dee Ave Bakersfield, CA 93312 

www.xoinnovations.com 

Description of Approved Aircraft

Aircraft 

make 

Aircraft 

model 

Aircraft 

type 

Aircraft proposed UAS operation

Aircraft Maximum 

weight (including 

payload). 

DJI Phantom 3 Rotorcraft 

. Real State

. Telecommunications towers 

. Power lines 

. Gas and Oil Wells 

. Agriculture Land Mapping 

. Confined Space 3.5 LBS 

DJI Inspire 1 Rotorcraft 

. Telecommunications towers

. Power lines 

. Gas and Oil Wells 

. Agriculture Land Mapping 

. Confined Space 6.5 LBS 

DJI Matrice 100 Rotorcraft 

. Telecommunications towers 

. Power lines 

. Gas and Oil Wells 

. Agriculture Land Mapping 

. Confined Space 6.5 LBS 

3DR Aero-M Fixed-wing 

. Gas and Oil Wells Land Mapping

. Agriculture Land Mapping 8 LBS
Editorial Note on Subpart 113.25 of Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 113.25 of part 113 appear by CGD-94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996.

§ 113.25-9 Location of general emergency alarm signal. General emergency alarm signal must: ( a ) Be located in passenger and crew quarters areas where they can alert persons in spaces where those persons may be maintaining, repairing, or operating equipment, stowing or drawing stores or equipment, or transiting, such as public spaces, work spaces, machinery spaces, workshops, galleys, emergency firepump room, bow thruster rooms, storage areas for paint, rope, and other stores, underdeck passageways in cargo areas, steering gear rooms, windlass rooms, holds of roll-on/roll-off vessels, and, except those that are accessible only through bolted manhole covers, duct keels with valve operators; and
( b ) Be audible in the spaces identified in paragraph (a) of this section with all normally closed doors and accesses closed; and
( c ) Be installed in cabins without loudspeaker installation. Other audible devices, such as electronic alarm transducers, are permitted.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15272, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996; USCG-2015-0867, 80 FR 62469, Oct. 16, 2015]
Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Applied  Graphics  Technologies,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.  333-25059)  of our
report  dated  March  8,  1996,  on our  audit  of the  combined  statements  of
operations,   cash  flows  and  changes  in  owners'  equity  (deficit)  of  the
Predecessor  Group to Applied  Graphics  Technologies,  Inc.  for the year ended
December 31, 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                        Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
New York, New York
March 23, 1998


<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 4360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1819]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for Outer 
Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 216/222 in the Central 
Planning Area (CPA) in the Gulf of Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for 
Proposed Sale 216/222.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BOEM announces the availability of the proposed Notice of Sale 
(NOS) for proposed Sale 216/222 in the CPA. This Notice is published 
pursuant to 30 CFR 556.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. 
With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the 
Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides the 
affected states the opportunity to review the proposed NOS. The 
proposed NOS sets forth the proposed terms and conditions of the sale, 
including minimum bids, royalty rates, and rentals.

DATES: Affected states may comment on the size, timing, and location of 
proposed Sale 216/222 within 60 days following their receipt of the 
proposed NOS. The final NOS will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening is 
currently scheduled for June 20, 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed NOS for Sale 216/222 and a 
``Proposed Notice of Sale Package'' containing information essential to 
potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, 
Gulf of Mexico Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1201 Elmwood 
Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 
736-2519.
    Agency Contact: Steven Textoris, Acting Leasing Division Chief, 
Steven.Textoris@boem.gov.

    Dated: January 19, 2012.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-1819 Filed 1-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-VH-P
```
§ 116.433 Windows and air ports in fire control boundaries. ( a ) Windows or air ports must be of tempered or laminated glass of at least 6.5 millimeters (0.25 inches) in thickness. The use of other glazing material such as polycarbonate sheets may be approved by the Commandant for specific installations.
( b ) Windows or air ports in bulkheads adjacent to passageways must not extend below a point 910 millimeters (36 inches) above the deck unless storm rails, that are structurally independent of the glass, are fitted in the passageway.
( c ) Windows or air ports in A-Class bulkheads must be fitted with frames of steel or equivalent material. Glazing beads or angles of steel or equivalent material must be installed to hold glass in place in windows or air ports in a fire control boundary in event of a fire if: ( 1 ) Where a steel frame is used, it is not arranged to retain the glass in place; or
( 2 ) A frame of aluminum or other material with low melting point is used.
( d ) A window or air port that is adjacent to an embarkation station, escape route, or survival craft stowage must be: ( 1 ) Of A-Class construction; or
( 2 ) Fitted with shutters, operable from outside the space, of steel or equivalent material.
( e ) A window installed in an internal fire control boundary must comply with the requirements of § 72.05-30 in subchapter H of this chapter, except that fire window frames and glazing material listed by Underwriters Laboratories may be used in B-Class bulkheads.
( f ) Windows in doors in fire control boundaries must comply with the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section.
( g ) Windows complying with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section may be installed in the external boundaries of stairtowers if there are no unprotected openings in the side of the vessel below the windows and if the windows are not exposed to any other parts of the vessel at an angle of less than 180 degrees.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 900, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51350, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 12.503 Service or training requirements. ( a ) An applicant for an endorsement as QMED must provide the Coast Guard with proof of qualification based on 6 months of service in a rating at least equal to that of wiper or coal passer.
( b ) Approved training programs may be substituted for the required periods of service as follows: ( 1 ) A graduate of a school ship may qualify for a rating endorsement as QMED, without further service, upon satisfactory completion of the program of instruction. For this purpose, school ship is interpreted to mean an institution that offers a complete approved program of instruction, including a period of at-sea training, in the skills appropriate to the rating of QMED.
( 2 ) Training programs, other than those classified as a school ship, may be substituted for up to one-half of the required service. The service/training ratio for each program is determined by the Coast Guard.
§ 122.420 Crew training. ( a ) The owner, charterer, master, or managing operator shall instruct each crew member, upon first being employed and prior to getting underway for the first time on a particular vessel and at least once every three months, as to the duties that the crew member is expected to perform in an emergency including, but not limited to, the emergency instructions listed on the emergency instruction placard required by § 122.510, when applicable, the duties listed in the station bill required by § 122.514.
( b ) For a vessel described by 46 CFR 114.100(e), the training program in paragraph (a) of this section must address firefighting proficiency and must include, but need not be limited to— ( 1 ) Training in the use and location of firefighting equipment and general firefighting knowledge, including: ( i ) Location of firefighting appliances and emergency escape routes;
( ii ) Types and sources of ignition;
( iii ) Flammable materials, fire hazards and spread of fire;
( iv ) The need for constant vigilance;
( v ) Actions to be taken on board;
( vi ) Fire and smoke detection and automatic systems on board; and
( vii ) Classification of fire and applicable extinguishing agents.
( 2 ) The drills required by § 122.524, including fire location and fire type; and
( 3 ) Emergency egress training for each member of the crew, to occur for all members of the crew— ( i ) At least monthly while such members are employed on board the vessels; and
( ii ) Each time a crew member joins the crew of such vessel.
( c ) Training conducted on a sister vessel may be considered equivalent to the initial, monthly, and quarterly training requirements contained in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) Crew training shall be logged or otherwise documented for review by the Coast Guard upon request. The training entry shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Date of the training; and
( 2 ) General description of the training topics.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2021-0306, 86 FR 73171, Dec. 27, 2021]
1.
    
    Jiangsu Linyang Solarfun Co., Ltd. (PRC)2.
    
    Linyang Solar Power Investment Holding Ltd. (BVI)3.
    
    Shanghai Linyang Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC)4.
    
    Jiangsu Yangguang Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC)5.
    
    Solarfun Power U.S.A. Inc. (USA)6.
    
    Jiangsu Linyang Solarfun Engineering Research and Development
Center Co., Ltd. (PRC)7.
    
    Solarfun Power Hong Kong Limited (Hong Kong)8.
    
    Solarfun Power Deutschland GmbH (Germany)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 15-5120 September Term, 2015

 FIELD ON: APRIL 26, 2016

LAURA HOLMES AND PAUL JOST,

APPELLANTS

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

APPELLEE

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:14-cv-01243)

Before: GARLAND,* Chief Judge, HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, and RANDOLPH, Senior

 Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof and in accordance

with the opinion of the Court filed herein this date, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment declining to certify

plaintiffs’ Fifth Amendment question be affirmed. The district court’s decision not to certify

plaintiffs’ First Amendment question and to grant summary judgment to the Commission is hereby

reversed and the case remanded for the district court to certify that question to the court of appeals en

banc.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows

Deputy Clerk

Date: April 26, 2016

Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge Randolph.

* Chief Judge Garland was a member of the panel at the time the case was argued but did not

participate in the opinion.

USCA Case #15-5120 Document #1610420 Filed: 04/26/2016 Page 1 of 1