alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 147A.21 Person in charge of fumigation; during fumigation. ( a ) Until ventilation begins, or until the vessel leaves port, the person in charge of fumigation shall ensure that a qualified person inspects the vessel as follows: ( 1 ) He must use detection equipment for the fumigant that is used to ensure that the fumigant is confined to: ( i ) The space that is fumigated, if partial occupancy is allowed under § 147A.11(b)(1)(i); or
( ii ) The vessel, if no space is determined to be safe for occupancy under § 147A.11(b)(1)(i).
( 2 ) He must make inspections at the intervals that are determined to be necessary by the marine chemist or qualified person under § 147A.11 (b)(1)(ii).
( b ) If leakage occurs, the person in charge of fumigation shall: ( 1 ) Notify the person in charge of the vessel that there is leakage;
( 2 ) Ensure that all necessary measures are taken for the health and safety of any person; and
( 3 ) Notify the person in charge of the vessel when there is no danger to the health and safety of any person.
( c ) After the exposure period, if the vessel is in port, the person in charge of fumigation shall ensure that fumigators or other qualified persons ventilate the space that is fumigated as follows: ( 1 ) Hatch covers and vent seals must be removed, other routes of access to the atmosphere must be opened, and if necessary, mechanical ventilation must be used.
( 2 ) Personal protection equipment that is appropriate for the fumigant that is used must be worn.
( d ) If ventilation is completed before the vessel leaves port, the person in charge of fumigation shall: ( 1 ) Ensure that a qualified person, who is wearing the personal protection equipment for the fumigant that is used if remote detection equipment is not used, tests the space that is fumigated and determines if there is any danger to the health and safety of any person, including a danger from fumigant that may be retained in bagged, baled, or other absorbent cargo;
( 2 ) Notify the person in charge of the vessel of this determination; and
( 3 ) If it is determined that there is a danger: ( i ) Ensure that all measures are taken that are necessary for the health and safety of all persons; and
( ii ) Notify the person in charge of the vessel when there is no danger to the health and safety of any person.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.1122 Discharges of NLS residue from tank washing other than a prewash: Categories A, B, and C.

Tank washings that do not result from a prewash and that contain Category A, B, or C NLS residues must be discharged to a reception facility or discharged to the sea under § 153.1126 or § 153.1128 except those tank washings resulting from washing a tank that has been cleaned following a ventilation procedure in the approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual.
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.12 Single and separate organizational unit. ( a ) The State plan shall provide for the establishment or designation of a single and separate organizational unit to administer the IV-D plan. Such unit is referred to as the IV-D agency. Under this requirement: ( 1 ) The IV-D agency may be: ( i ) Located in any other agency of the State; or,
( ii ) Established as a new agency of the State.
( 2 ) The IV-D agency shall be responsible and accountable for the operation of the IV-D program. Except as provided in § 303.20 of this part, the agency need not perform all the functions of the IV-D program so long as it insures that all these functions are being carried out properly, efficiently, and effectively;
( 3 ) If the IV-D agency delegates any of the functions of the IV-D program to any other State or local agency or official, or any official with whom a cooperative agreement as described in § 302.34 has been entered into or purchases services from any person or private agency pursuant to § 304.22 of this part, the IV-D agency shall have responsibility for securing compliance with the requirements of the State plan by such agency or officials.
( b ) The State plan shall describe the structure of the IV-D agency and the distribution of responsibilities among the major divisions within the unit, and if it is located within another agency, show its place in such agency. If any of the IV-D program functions are to be performed outside of the IV-D agency then these functions shall be listed with the name of the organization responsible for performing them.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0253) [40 FR 27159, June 26, 1975, as amended at 51 FR 37731, Oct. 24, 1986; 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999]
§ 681.39 Are there any limitations on the right to appeal to the authority head? ( a ) A defendant has no right to appear personally, or through a representative, before the authority head.
( b ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling.
( c ) The authority head will not consider any objection or evidence that was not raised before the ALJ unless the defendant demonstrates that the failure to object was caused by extraordinary circumstances. If the defendant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the authority head that extraordinary circumstances prevented the presentation of evidence at the hearing, and that the additional evidence is material, the authority head may remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of the additional evidence.
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

July 24, 2018

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

540 Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse 

100 East Fifth Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202-3988

Re: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes

v. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission

No. 18-107

(Your No. 16-2424)

Dear Clerk:

The petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on June 

24, 2018 and placed on the docket July 24, 2018 as No. 18-107. 

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

by

Michael Duggan

Case Analyst

 

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

Case 2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG ECF No. 93 filed 07/26/18 PageID.2391 Page 1 of 1 Case: 16-2424 Document: 97 Filed: 07/26/2018 Page: 1
Tethnical

Bulletin

8-96

Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas

for Structures Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas

in accordance with the

National Flood Insurance Program

I

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGENCY

MITIGATION Directorate

FIA-TB-8

(8/96)
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Natural Nutrition, Inc.,
      formerly CSI Business Finance, Inc., (the “Company”) Form 10-QSB for the
      quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:
                  September 7, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Wm
                Chris MathersName:
            Wm
                Chris MathersTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
#### § 140.800 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all towing vessels unless otherwise specified. Certain vessels are also subject to the navigation safety regulations in 33 CFR parts 163 and 164.
§ 119.220 Installations. ( a ) The installation requirements for machinery and boilers for steam and electrically propelled vessels are contained in applicable regulations in subchapter F (Marine Engineering) and subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) Installation of propulsion machinery of an unusual type for small passenger vessels must be given separate consideration and must be subject to such requirements as determined necessary by the cognizant OCMI. Unusual types of propulsion machinery include: ( 1 ) Gas turbine machinery installations;
( 2 ) Air screws;
( 3 ) Hydraulic jets; and
( 4 ) Machinery installations using lift devices.
-  National Intelligence Systems as NetworksNational Intelligence Systems as NetworksMarco Cepik, PhD and Gustavo Möller 
                    -  Defected from ISIS or Simply Returned, and for How Long?Defected from ISIS or Simply Returned, and for How Long?Anne Speckhard, PhD, Ahmet S. Yayla, PhD, and Ardian Shajkovci, PhD 
                    -  Contentious Borders in the Middle East and North AfricaContentious Borders in the Middle East and North AfricaRaffaella A. Del Sarto, PhD 
                    -  Strategic Communications for Peace OperationsStrategic Communications for Peace OperationsPaul D. Williams, PhD
§ 140.105 Applicability and delayed implementation for existing vessels. This part applies to all towing vessels subject to this subchapter. ( a ) With the exception § 140.500, which has a later implementation date, an existing towing vessel must comply with the requirements in this part no later than either July 20, 2018 or the date the vessel obtains a Certificate of Inspection (COI), whichever date is earlier.
( b ) The delayed implementation provisions in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to a new towing vessel.
§ 109.209 Appliances for watertight integrity. ( a ) Before getting underway, the master or person in charge shall insure that each appliance for watertight integrity is closed and watertight.
( b ) If existing conditions warrant, the master or person in charge may permit appliances for watertight integrity to be open while afloat.
#### § 133.03 Relationship to international standards.

This subpart and subpart B of this part are based on Chapter III, SOLAS. Section numbers in this subpart and subpart B of this part are generally related to the regulation numbers in Chapter III, SOLAS, but paragraph designations are not related to the numbering in Chapter III, SOLAS. To find the corresponding Chapter III, SOLAS regulation for this subpart and subpart B of this part, beginning with § 133.10, divide the section number following the decimal point by 10.
#### George W. Austin *v.*Clinton W. Stanley, Adm'r.

Under tlie homestead act, a debtor cannot hold a place which was not his home at the time of the levy of his creditor’s execution.

Writ oe entry. Submitted upon an agreed statement of facts.

The demanded premises are in Weare, in this county, and consist of a house and lot of land of the value of five hundred dollars. The defendant claims title by virtue of the levy of an execution in his favor as administrator against the plaintiff on a claim arising since July 4, 1851, *52and the plaintiff claims under the " act to exempt the homestead of families from attachment and levy on execution passed July 4, 1851.” At the time of the attachment of the premises by the defendant, neither the plaintiff nor his family were in the occupation of the same, nor have they been since, though, at a period some time prior to the attachment, the plaintiff had occupied them. At the time of the levy the plaintiff demanded of the officer a homestead, which he declined tó set off. At the time of the attachment and levy the plaintiff had no other real estate, nor any right, title or interest in any; but he was theniwith his family living in Winchester, in the county of Cheshire ; but there was a family living in the house on said premises who he claimed were his tenants.

*S. IT. Bell,*for the plaintiff.

*Morrison, Stanley & Ciarle,*for defendant.

Doe, J.

The Homestead Act, ch. 1089, Laws 1851, provides that the family homestead of the head of each family shall be exempt. "Homestead” means home place, or place of the home, and the question whether the premises were exempt from the levy of the defendant’s execution, is to be determined by the rules applicable to residence or domicile — rules of familiar and frequent application in questions of right to vote and liability to be taxed. The statute was specially intended to secure to debtors and their families, the shelter of the homestead roof; not to exempt mere investments in real estate, or the rents and profits derived therefrom.

. Temporary absence from the premises, with intent to retain the home there and to return to it, would not be an .abandonment of the home or a relinquishment of the homestead right. *Davis*v. *Andrews,*30 Vt. 678; *Taylor*v. *Boulware,*17 Texas 74; *Benedict*v. *Bunnell,*7 Cal. 245; *Moss*v. *Warner,*10 Cal. 296. It would- probably be a reasonable conclusion from the agreed facts, that the premises were not exempt; but the plaintiff’s intention is not stated, and it would seem that it ought to appear in this case. During the temporary absence, his possession might be retained by agents or servants; but if he transferred his occupation and right of possession to a tenant, the exemption might cease.

*Dase discharged.*
#### § 127.630 Electrical installation requirements.

Electrical installations must comply with regulation II—1/42 of SOLAS, 1974, as amended (incorporated by reference, see § 125.180) in lieu of regulation II-1/43.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1989 

To provide for subsidies for interest on loans for rural multifamily housing 

guaranteed by the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for subsidies for interest on loans for rural multifamily housing guaranteed by the Rural Housing Service 

of the Department of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Section 538 Improve5 ment Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUBSIDIES FOR INTEREST ON GUARANTEED LOANS 

7 FOR RURAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING. 

8 The item relating to ‘‘Rural Housing Service—Rural 

9 Housing Insurance Fund Program Account’’ in title III 

10 of division A of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1989 IH

1 (Public Law 111–8) is amended by striking ‘‘That, for ap2 plications received under the 2009 notice of funding avail3 ability, section 538 multi-family housing guaranteed loans 

4 funded pursuant to this paragraph shall not be subject 

5 to a guarantee fee and the interest on such loans may 

6 not be subsidized’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘That the 

7 Secretary may reduce the funding for section 538 multi8 family housing guaranteed loans by up to $29,090,000, 

9 and use such amounts as equivalent funds to subsidize 

10 the interest on 538 multi-family housing guaranteed 

11 loans for which applications are received under the 2009 

12 notice of funding availability’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Sharpe, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Kevin M. SharpeKevin M. Sharpe, Vice President and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer




19
#### § 137.302 Documenting compliance for the Coast Guard inspection option.

The managing owner or managing operator of a towing vessel, who has selected the Coast Guard inspection option, must make their vessel available for the Coast Guard to conduct the examinations required by this subpart in accordance with the intervals prescribed in § 137.300.
#### Annie F. Kiesow, as Administratrix of the Estate of William H. Kiesow, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*New York City Railway Company, Defendant, and New York Mail Company, Appellant.

*Kiesow*v. *New York Oity By. Go.,*128 App. Div. 904, affirmed.

(Argued December 10, 1909;

decided January 11, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 29, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.

*554
      *Charles F. Brown*and *James J. Mahoney*for appellant.

*Frank Moss*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur; Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
§ 120.352 Battery categories. This section applies to batteries installed to meet the requirements of § 120.310 of this part for secondary sources of power to vital loads, or sources of power to final emergency loads. ( a ) *Large.* A large battery installation is one connected to a battery charger having an output of more than 2 kilowatts (kw), computed from the highest possible charging current and the rated voltage of the battery installation.
( b ) *Small.* A small battery installation is one connected to a battery charger having an output of 2 kw or less, computed as above.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.01-3 [Reserved]
This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17 US Code)
§ 129.110 Applicability. ( a ) Electrical installations on OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must comply with subchapter J of this chapter.
( b ) Except as specifically provided in this subchapter, electrical installations on an OSV of less than 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must comply with subchapter J of this chapter.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48936, Aug. 18, 2014]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 15-5264 September Term, 2015

1:15-cv-01217-TSC

Filed On: August 2, 2016 [1628138]

Pursuing America's Greatness,

 Appellant

v.

Federal Election Commission, Office of

General Counsel, 

 Appellee

O R D E R

 It is ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the Clerk withhold issuance of

the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing

or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41. This

instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party to move for

expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken R. Meadows

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #15-5264 Document #1628138 Filed: 08/02/2016 Page 1 of 1
#### Levi F. Bowen, *Respondent, v.*Robert W. Beck, *Appellant,*Impleaded, *etc.*

—Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 11.448 Requirements for mate of Great Lakes and inland self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT.

The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as mate of Great Lakes and inland self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT is 2 years of total service in the deck department of self-propelled vessels. One year of the required service must have been on vessels of 50 GRT or more. Three months of the required service must have been while performing bridge watchkeeping duties under the supervision of the master or a qualified officer on vessels of 50 GRT or more.
#### § 147A.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe the requirements for shipboard fumigation that are critical for the health and safety of the crew and any other person who is on board a vessel during fumigation. These are interim rules pending further study and promulgation of comprehensive regulations on shipboard fumigation.
#### Leonard Singer, as Administrator of the Estate of Edith Singer, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Singer*V. *R. 7. O. & R. R. R. R. Go.,*133 App. Div. 890, affirmed.

(Argued January 11, 1910;

decided January 25, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court-in the second judicial department, entered May 10, 1909, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action *589to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant’s negligence.

*John F. Brennan*and *Mortimer B. Patterson*for appellant.

*Albert A. Wray, Edward Frank Glover*and *William McCauley*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscooic, JJ.
Manufacturing Flow Diagram for TS-AN3150