alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 (File No.s 333-89347, 333-85219, 333-85061, 333-42532,
333-72282, 333-90628, 333-102645, 333-105444, 333-109293, 333-74223 and 333-01223) and Form S-8 (File
No.s 333-45253, 333-64525, 333-46589, 333-52799, 333-72425, 333-79007,
333-52805, 333-56133, 333-08775, 333-37041, 333-33943, 333-18975, 333-18977,
333-08783, 333-81751, 333-87685, 333-88201, 333-87151, 333-84981, 333-80267,
333-08789, 333-08793, 333-08801, 333-23043, 333-42475, 333-31400, 333-31738,
333-40992, 333-43184, 333-64188, 333-109947, 333-116620 and 333-116792) of Lucent
Technologies Inc. of our report dated October 20, 2004, except for Note 7 and
the second and eleventh paragraphs of Note 13, as to which the date is November
9, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in
the Annual Report to Shareowners, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

/s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
December 3, 2004

---

---
#### Simmons *v.*The State.

Submitted October 17,

Decided November 9, 1906.

Accusation of vagrancy. Before Judge Henderson. City court of Yienna. August 23, 1906.

Beck, J.

1. No question for decision is raised by an assignment of error upon the overruling of an objection to the admission of evidence, unless it appears that the grounds of the objection were urged before the court below on the trial of the case.

2. Where upon the trial of one for the offense of vagrancy it was charged in one count of the accusation that the defendant is a “professional gambler living in idleness,” the court did not err in refusing a request to charge the following: “Under the law of vagrancy the gist of the offense is the failure or the refusal of the offender to work, when work is necessary to support himself.”

3. No error of law is made to appear in the other grounds of the motion; and there being some evidence to support the verdict, the judgment refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*633
      *Busbee &*Busbee, for plaintiff in error.

*W. V. Harvard, solicitor,*and *B. F. Strozier,*contra.
§ 108.459 Number and location of outlets. ( a ) A foam extinguishing system in a space must have enough outlets to spread a layer of foam of uniform thickness over the deck or bilge areas of the space.
( b ) A foam extinguishing system in a space that has a boiler on a flat that is open to or can drain into a lower portion of the space must have enough outlets to spread a layer of foam of uniform thickness over the— ( 1 ) Flat; and
( 2 ) Deck or bilge areas of the space.
( c ) A foam extinguishing system for a tank must have enough outlets to spread a layer of foam of uniform thickness over the surface of the liquid in the tank.
#### § 75.412 Classification of costs.

There is no universal rule for classifying certain costs as either direct or indirect (F&A) under every accounting system. A cost may be direct with respect to some specific service or function, but indirect with respect to the Federal award or other final cost objective. Therefore, it is essential that each item of cost incurred for the same purpose be treated consistently in like circumstances either as a direct or an indirect (F&A) cost in order to avoid possible double-charging of Federal awards. Guidelines for determining direct and indirect (F&A) costs charged to Federal awards are provided in this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


DoD Retirement Board of Actuaries

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the Board has been scheduled to execute the 
provisions of Chapter 74, Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 1464 
et seq.) The Board shall review DoD actuarial methods and assumptions 
to be used in the valuation of the Military Retirement System. Persons 
desiring to attend the DoD Retirement Board of Actuaries meeting, or 
make an oral presentation or submit a written statement for 
consideration at the meeting, must notify Inger Pettygrove at (703) 
696-7413 by August 13, 2007.
    Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

DATES: August 31, 2007 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 270, Arlington, VA 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inger Pettygrove, DoD Office of the 
Actuary, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 308, Arlington, VA 22203 (703) 
696-7413.

    Dated: March 28, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-1624 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Patricia F. Russo,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc., certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lucent Technologies Inc. (the“registrant”);

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: December 3, 2004
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1967 

To prohibit funding organizations that support or participate in coercive 

abortion or involuntary sterilization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding organizations that support or participate 

in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING ORGANIZATIONS 

4 THAT SUPPORT OR PARTICIPATE IN COER5 CIVE ABORTION OR INVOLUNTARY STERI6 LIZATION. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the Secretary of State may not make a con9 tribution, whether voluntary or assessed, to any organiza10 tion or program that supports or participates in the manVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:12 Apr 07, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1967.IH H1967

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1967 IH

1 agement of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary 

2 sterilization. 

3 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘supports 

4 or participates in’’ includes providing material, financial, 

5 or technical support to any government, agency, or non6 governmental organization that enforces or implements a 

7 program that includes coercive abortion or involuntary 

8 sterilization (or any government agency or nongovern9 mental organization that controls, is controlled by, or is 

10 under common control of such government or agency). 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Manufacturing Flow Diagram for TS - AN3150
§ 111.79-9 Transmitting power between receptacles. ( a ) If it is necessary to transmit current in one direction between two receptacle outlets by a flexible cable with a plug on each end, such as a battery charging lead between a receptacle outlet on a ship and a receptacle outlet in a lifeboat, the plug that may be energized when not in the receptacle outlet must be female.
( b ) If a receptacle outlet may be used as a source of power and as a receiver of power, such as the receptacles on barges that may have to supply power to adjoining barges in some makeup and receive power from the towboat or adjoining barge in other makeups, the receptacles must be male and reverse service. Plugs of flexible cable must be female and must be at both ends of the flexible lead. The female plug must meet § 111.79-1(d) or § 111.79-3.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2011-0618, 76 FR 60754, Sept. 30, 2011]
We’re sorry, this site is currently experiencing technical difficulties.  Please try again in a few moments.Exception: request blocked
#### § 122.208 Accidents to machinery.

The owner, managing operator, or master shall report damage to a boiler, unfired pressure vessel, or machinery that renders further use of the item unsafe until repairs are made, to the OCMI at the port in which the casualty occurred or nearest the port of first arrival, as soon as practicable after the damage occurs.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-5162 September Term, 2013

1:11-cv-01841-JEB

Filed On: September 11, 2013

Wendy E. Wagner, et al.,

Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge; Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown,

Griffith, Kavanaugh, and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that this case be removed from

the oral argument calendar of September 30, 2013, and held in abeyance

pending the Supreme Court’s disposition of McCutcheon v. Federal Election

Commission. See Order List, McCutcheon v. FEC, No. 12-536 (Aug. 30, 2013)

(granting motion of Senator Mitch McConnell for leave to participate in oral

argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument); Brief of Appellant

Republican National Committee, McCutcheon v. FEC, No. 12-536 (filed May 6,

2013). 

Within 30 days of the date of the Supreme Court’s disposition of

McCutcheon, appellants and appellee are directed to file supplemental briefs (not

to exceed 20 pages), addressing the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in

McCutcheon on this case.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #13-5162 Document #1455905 Filed: 09/11/2013 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GERALD BAKKE, INDIVIDUALLY

NAD ON BEHALF OF 7800 RANCH

INVESTMENT, INC., A TEXAS

CLOSELY

- HELD CORPORATION,

Appellants,

v.

JOHN H. HARVISON,

GLENDA SUE HARVISON,

JOHN D. HARVISON, 7HBF LTD.,

7HBF MANAGEMENT CO., LTD,

DONALD H. RAY, DONALD H. RAY,

P.C., AND RAY & WILSON,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00300

- CV

Appeal from

352nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 352

- 244033

- 10)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for

further proceedings, in accordance with this Court = s opinion. We further order that Appellants

recover from Appellees all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue, and this decision be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
§ 108.705 Anchors, chains, wire rope, and hawsers. ( a ) Each unit must be fitted with anchors, chains, wire rope, and hawsers in agreement with the standards established by the American Bureau of Shipping.
( b ) Units which are equipped with anchors used as operational equipment are not required to have additional anchors if the operational anchors meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56808, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53226, Oct. 1, 1999]
DAVID SHARPE

,

Appellant,

v.

MARIA SHARPE

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5018

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 18, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County

. Mary Day Coker , Judge

.

David Sharpe, pro se , Appellant.

Beth Gordon of The Gordon Law Firm, Williston , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### § 75.451 Losses on other awards or contracts.

Any excess of costs over income under any other award or contract of any nature is unallowable. This includes, but is not limited to, the non-Federal entity's contributed portion by reason of cost-sharing agreements or any under-recoveries through negotiation of flat amounts for indirect (F&A) costs. Also, any excess of costs over authorized funding levels transferred from any award or contract to another award or contract is unallowable. All losses are not allowable indirect (F&A) costs and are required to be included in the appropriate indirect cost rate base for allocation of indirect costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Pamela Wiley,

Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NUMBER: 14-12739

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MORRIS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On April 17, 2015, Magistrate Judge Morris issued a Report and

Recommendation [Doc.15], recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [Doc. 14] be DENIED; Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

12] be GRANTED; and, the case be REMANDED to the Commissioner under

section four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Neither party filed objections within the fourteen

day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly,

the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. 

Defendant’s motion is DENIED; Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED; and, the

case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence for of 42 U.S.C. §405(g)

consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

Judgment of Remand will enter.

IT IS ORDERED.

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: June 5, 2015

2:14-cv-12739-VAR-PTM Doc # 16 Filed 06/05/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 446
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

June 5, 2015.

S/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2

2:14-cv-12739-VAR-PTM Doc # 16 Filed 06/05/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 447
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 1999 (un-audited) and the Statement of
Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2000 (un-audited) and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                 1,334,823
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          601,357
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            573,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,552,862
<PP&E>                                 1,665,091
<DEPRECIATION>                         50,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         4,679,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  398,326
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               21,490,000
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           4,679,958
<SALES>                                761,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       761,303
<CGS>                                  280,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          481,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (30,301)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (30,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           (30,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0



</TABLE>
§ 136.210 Obtaining or renewing a COI. Owners and managing operators must submit Form CG-3752, “Application for Inspection of U.S. Vessel,” to the cognizant OCMI where the inspection will take place. The owner or managing operator must submit the application at least 30 days before the vessel will undergo the initial inspection for certification. The owner or managing operator must schedule an inspection for this initial certification with the cognizant OCMI at least 3 months before the vessel is to undergo the inspection for certification. ( a ) In addition to Form CG-3752, the owner or managing operator must submit: ( 1 ) For initial certification: ( i ) Vessel particular information; and
( ii ) Number of persons in addition to the crew, if requested; or
( 2 ) For a renewal of certification: ( i ) Any changes to the information in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
( ii ) A description of any modifications to the vessel.
( b ) In addition to Form CG-3752 and the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the owner or managing operator of vessels utilizing the TSMS option must submit: ( 1 ) Objective evidence that the owner or managing operator and the vessel are in compliance with the TSMS requirements in part 138 of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) Objective evidence that the vessel's structure, stability, and essential systems comply with the applicable requirements of this subchapter for the intended route and service. This objective evidence may be in the form of a survey report issued by a TPO or another form acceptable to the Coast Guard.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-11249) pertaining to the First USA Paymentech, Inc. Retirement 
Savings Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-06979) pertaining to 
the First USA, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-02786) pertaining to the First USA Paymentech, Inc. Amended and 
Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan and the First USA Paymentech Inc. Amended and 
Restated 1996 Restricted Stock Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 
333-17645) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of First USA 
Paymentech, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-24859) and 
related Prospectus of First USA Paymentech, Inc. for the registration of 
4,000,000 shares of its common stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 
333-32697) and related Prospectus of First USA Paymentech, Inc. for the 
registration of 360,000 shares of its common stock, the Registration Statement 
(Form S-3 No. 333-60349) and related Prospectus of Paymentech, Inc. for the 
registration of 67,289 shares of its common stock, the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-49519) pertaining to the Paymentech, Inc. 1996 Amended and 
Restated Stock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 
333-57817) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Paymentech, Inc. of
our report dated July 23, 1998 incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Paymentech, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1998, with respect to 
the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form 10-K/A.

Our audits also included the financial statements schedule of Paymentech, Inc. 
listed in Item 14(a) of the Form 10-K/A. This schedule is the responsibility of 
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based 
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to 
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a 
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth 
therein.



                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
December 11, 1998
§ 125.150 Lifesaving systems. ( a ) Lifesaving appliances and arrangements on OSVs of less than 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must comply with part 133 of this subchapter.
( b ) Lifesaving appliances and arrangements on OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must comply with subparts A, B, and D of part 199 of this chapter.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48934, Aug. 18, 2014]
#### § 136.175 Approved equipment.

Where equipment in this subchapter is required to be of an approved type, such equipment requires the specific approval of the Coast Guard. A list of approved equipment and materials may be found online at *http://cgmix.uscg.mil/Equipment/EquipmentSearch.aspx*. Any OCMI may be contacted for information concerning approved equipment and materials.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Qi Tang, the Chief Executive Officer of Nevaeh Enterprises Ltd. (the "Company") hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form
10-K, as amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2013

/s/ _Qi Tang__

Qi Tang Chief Executive Officer