alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
nitawhite-ivyemploymenta












 












 












 












 












 












 












 












 












 












 












 












 












 






=== BlackBer'Y:                                                    Appendix A                                        Restrictive Covenant Addendum   "Company Competitor" means the following entities:                                                  BlackBerry Corporation         5000 Riverside Drive, Suite 100E, Irving, Texas, USA 75039 USA. tel: +1 (972) 373-1700 fax: +1 (972) 501-0894       BlackBerry and related trademarks, names and logos arethe  propertyof  BlackBerryLimited  and areregistered  and/or used in                                        the U.S. and countries aroundthe  world.
§ 111.75-16 Lighting of survival craft and rescue boats. ( a ) During preparation, launching, and recovery, each survival craft and rescue boat, its launching appliance, and the area of water into which it is to be launched or recovered must be adequately illuminated by lighting supplied from the emergency power source.
( b ) The arrangement of circuits must be such that the lighting for adjacent launching stations for survival craft or rescue boats is supplied by different branch circuits.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28282, June 4, 1996]
EX-10.9





 Exhibit 10.9 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE 

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of May [•], 2020, by
and between PTK Acquisition Corp, a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and PTK Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Payee”). All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note (as defined below). 
 WHEREAS, Maker has issued that certain
Promissory Note, dated October 10, 2019, in the principal amount of $300,000, to Payee, as amended on April 22, 2020 (the “Note”). 

WHEREAS, Maker and Payee desire to amend the Note as set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment.
Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “1. Principal. The principal balance of this
Promissory Note (this “Note”) shall be payable as follows: upon the consummation of Maker’s initial public offering of its securities (the “IPO”), the entire principal balance of this Note shall be convertible
into 400,000 private warrants (as defined in the registration statement on Form S-1 filed by Maker on or about April 22, 2020) issuable to Payee at a purchase price of $0.75 per warrant; provided, that
the entire principal balance of this Note shall be due and payable in cash on the date on which Maker determines not to conduct an initial public offering of its securities. The principal balance may be prepaid at any time.” 

2. Effect of Amendment. All terms and provisions of the Note shall continue in full force and effect except as expressly modified by
this Amendment. 
 3. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefits of the parties hereto and
their respective successors and assigns and is not intended to confer upon any other Person any rights or remedies hereunder. 
 4.
Construction. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAW PROVISIONS THEREOF. 

5. Captions; Counterparts. The captions in this Amendment are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of or affect the
construction or interpretation of any provision of this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature Page Follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of
the date first above written. 
  

	
	PTK ACQUISITION CORP.
	
	By:
	  
 /s/ Peter Kuo

	Name: Peter Kuo
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	
	PTK HOLDINGS LLC
	
	 /s/ Peter Kuo

	Name: Peter Kuo
	Title: Manager
EXHIBIT 10.3


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No 333-117529) and Form S-8 (No 333-110696,
333-100971 and 333-11650) of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. of my report
dated January 18, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of
Surf-Communications Solutions Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004.



Arlington, MA

June 27, 2005
                                                                /S/ Walter Fey
                                                                Walter Fey, CPA
|   | (i) | the accompanying report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended July 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                    |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Dated: October 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Craig A. Johnson                    |   |
|                    |   | Craig A. JohnsonChief Financial Officer |
|                    |   |                                    |

----
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


          The undersigned,  a member of the Board of Directors and/or as Officer
of CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY,  INC., a corporation  registered in the
Republic of the Philippines  (the  "Company"),  hereby  constitutes and appoints
Douglas L.  Anderson and Steven A. McArthur and each of them as his/her true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for and in his/her stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on
his/her  behalf the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ending
December  31, 1999 and to execute any  amendments  thereto and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with
the United  States  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  and  applicable  stock
exchanges,  with the full power and  authority  to do and perform each and every
act and thing  necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes as he might or
could  do  in  person,   hereby   ratifying   and   confirming   all  that  said
attorney-in-fact and agent or his/her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated as of March 21, 2000.

/s/ David L. Sokol                               /s/ Gregory E. Abel
DAVID L. SOKOL                                   GREGORY E. ABEL


/s/ Patrick J. Goodman                           /s/ David A. Baldwin
PATRICK J. GOODMAN                               DAVID A. BALDWIN


/s/ Marivic Espiritu                             /s/ Jose Jaime Cruz
MARIVIC ESPIRITU                                 JOSE JAIME CRUZ


/s/ Robert S. Silberman                          /s/ Rachael Hernandez
ROBERT S. SILBERMAN                              RACHAEL HERNANDEZ
#### § 113.65-5 General requirements.

Each whistle operator must meet Section 18 of IEEE 45.1-2017 (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Frederick W. Dietz, agt. Archibald McCallum, *et at.*

*At Special Term,*

*February,*1873.

Where the_ defendants in this case procured a settlement, with the design to deprive the plaintiffs attorney of his costs, held, that they could not be permitted to have the benefit of a discontinuance or of a supplemental answer showing settlement without payment of the costs of the action up to the present time.

Motion by defendants for discontinuance of action, or for leave to serve a supplemental answer showing settlement,

Mr. Lauterbach, *for the motion.*

G. Storms Carpenter, *opposed.*

Freedman, J.

Although, as a general rule, an attorney has no lien for costs as against the adverse party until a judgment is entered, or at least a verdict obtained, and for that reason the parties are at liberty, to settle the suit between themselves before verdict or judgment, yet where such settlement is privately effected with the design of preventing an attorney from obtaining his costs, the court will, notwithstanding the settlement, allow the attorney to go #n and collect the costs in the action, that he may thereby secure himself. Where there is collusion, it can make no difference whether the damages are liquidated or not. The power of the court is hot limited to cases where the action is brought for a liquidated sum, but it interposes upon the general principle that it is equitable and right to protect the attorney against a dishonest combination between the parties to de*494prive him of the fruits of his labor and services *(Rasquin*agt. *The Knickerbocker Stage Co.,*12 *Abb.,*329 ; *Keenan*agt. *Durfinger,*19 *How.,*153, 12 *Abb.*327, *note*; *McDowell*agt. *The Second Av. R.R. Co.,*4 *Bosw.,*670 ; *Owen*agt. *Mason,*18 *How.,*156 ; *Wood*agt. *The Trustees of the Northwest Presbyterian Church,*7 *Abb.,*210, *note).*

In the two last named cases it was further said that a judgment procured by the attorney, subsequent to the settlement between the parties, for his taxable costs was regular, but that the judgment might be opened as matter of favor, to allow the defendant to try the case if he desired. That on such trial the defendant could not prove a settlement without Having filed a supplemental answer setting it up, and that the court would allow such an answer, for such a purpose, to be filed only on payment of all the costs of the action up to that time. ,

As I am satisfied that the defendants in this case procured the settlement "with the design to deprive plaintiff’s attorney of his"costs, I cannot permit them to have the benefit of a discontinuance or of a supplemental answer without payment of the costs of the action up to the present time. The motion is therefore granted, but upon the condition referred to, and unless such condition be complied with within twenty days, the motion is denied with'$10' costs.
§ 133.20 Exemptions. ( a ) If a District Commander determines that the overall safety of the persons on board an OSV will not be significantly reduced, the District Commander may grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of this part to a specific OSV for a specified geographic area within the boundaries of the Coast Guard District. This exemption may be limited to certain periods of the year.
( b ) Requests for exemption under this section must be in writing to the OCMI for transmission to the District Commander in the area in which the OSV is in service or will be in service.
( c ) If the exemption is granted by the District Commander, the OCMI will endorse the OSV's Certificate of Inspection with a statement describing the exemption.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year  ended  December  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  by  SmartServ  Online,   Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.



                                                /s/  Robert M. Pons
                                                --------------------------------
                                                     Robert M. Pons
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Dated: April 12, 2004



                                                /s/  Len von Vital
                                                --------------------------------
                                                     Len von Vital
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Dated: April 12, 2004


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to SmartServ  Online,  Inc.  and will be retained by SmartServ  Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2048 

To authorize appropriations for the Office of Detention and Removal of 

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2009 

Mr. MCCAUL (for himself, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. OLSON, Mr. BILBRAY, and 

Mr. MARCHANT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the Office of Detention and 

Removal of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR OF4 FICE OF DETENTION AND REMOVAL. 

5 There is authorized to be appropriated 

6 $5,000,000,000 to the Office of Detention and Removal 

7 of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
§ 114.540 Equivalents. ( a ) The Commandant may approve any arrangement, fitting, appliance, apparatus, equipment, calculation, information, or test which provides a level of safety equivalent to that established by specific provisions of this subchapter. Requests for approval must be submitted to the Marine Safety Center. If necessary, the Marine Safety Center may require engineering evaluations and tests to demonstrate the equivalence of the substitute.
( b ) The Commandant may accept compliance by a high speed craft with the provisions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) “Code of Safety for High Speed Craft” as an equivalent to compliance with applicable requirements of this subchapter. Requests for a determination of equivalency for a particular vessel must be submitted to the Marine Safety Center.
( c ) The Commandant may approve a novel lifesaving appliance or arrangement as an equivalent if it has performance characteristics at least equivalent to the appliance or arrangement required under this part, and: ( 1 ) Is evaluated and tested under IMO Resolution A.520(13), “Code of Practice for the Evaluation, Testing and Acceptance of Prototype Novel Life-Saving Appliances and Arrangements”; or
( 2 ) Has successfully undergone an evaluation and tests that are substantially equivalent to those recommendations.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 885, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51348, Sept. 30, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2090 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2090

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2009

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 431 State Street in Ogdensburg, New York, as the ``Frederic 
                   Remington Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FREDERIC REMINGTON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 431 State Street in Ogdensburg, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Frederic Remington Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frederic 
Remington Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

ROSE COULTER-OWENS,

individually, and on behalf of all others

similarly situated 

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 14-12688 

v.

RODALE, INC.,

Defendant(s).

__________________________/

ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MOTION TO INTERVENE

The court has received a Motion to Intervene [Dkt #40] filed by the Attorney

General of the State of Michigan pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.1 and 28 U.S.C. 2403(b),

and hereby GRANTS the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

December 14, 2015

notice to: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\14-12688.RODALE.Order.Granting.Intervene.wpd

1

2:14-cv-12688-RHC-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/14/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 346
§ 116.810 Overnight accommodations. ( a ) A berth must be provided for each passenger authorized to be carried in overnight accommodation spaces. Each berth must measure at least 1880 millimeters (74 inches) by 610 millimeters (24 inches) and have at least 610 millimeters (24 inches) of clear space above.
( b ) Berths must not be located more than three high and must be constructed of wood, fiber reinforced plastic, or metal. A berth located more than 1,525 millimeters (60 inches) above the deck must be fitted with a suitable aid for access.
( c ) The construction and arrangement of berths and other furniture must allow free and unobstructed access to each berth. Each berth must be immediately adjacent to an aisle leading to a means of escape from the accommodation space. As aisle alongside a berth must be at least 610 millimeters (24 inches) wide. An aisle joining two or more aisles in an overnight accommodation space must be at least 1,065 millimeters (42 inches) wide.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 900, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51350, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 136.230 Routes permitted. ( a ) The area of operation for each towing vessel and any necessary operational limits are determined by the cognizant OCMI and recorded on the vessel's COI. Each area of operation, referred to as a route, is described on the COI under the major headings “Oceans,” “Coastwise,” “Limited Coastwise,” “Great Lakes,” “Lakes, Bays, and Sounds,” or “Rivers,” as applicable. Additional limitations imposed or extensions granted are described by reference to bodies of waters, geographical points, distances from geographical points, distances from land, depths of channel, seasonal limitations, and similar factors.
( b ) Operation of a towing vessel on a route of lesser severity than those specifically described or designated on the COI is permitted, unless the route is expressly prohibited on the COI. The general order of decreasing severity of routes is: Oceans; coastwise; limited coastwise; Great Lakes; lakes, bays, and sounds; and rivers. The cognizant OCMI may prohibit a vessel from operating on a route of lesser severity than the primary route on which a vessel is authorized to operate, if local conditions necessitate such a restriction.
( c ) When designating a permitted route or imposing any operational limits on a towing vessel, the cognizant OCMI may consider: ( 1 ) The route-specific requirements of this subchapter;
( 2 ) The performance capabilities of the vessel based on design, scantlings, stability, subdivision, propulsion, speed, operating modes, maneuverability, and other characteristics;
( 3 ) The suitability of the vessel for nighttime operations and use in all weather conditions;
( 4 ) Vessel operations in globally remote areas or severe environments not covered by this subchapter. Such areas may include, but are not limited to, polar regions, remote islands, areas of extreme weather, or other remote areas where timely emergency assistance cannot be anticipated; and
( 5 ) The TSMS applicable to the vessel, if the vessel has one.
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QA7 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1953 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Hope Scholarship 

Credit to be used for elementary and secondary education expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. PAUL (for himself and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

Hope Scholarship Credit to be used for elementary and 

secondary education expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hope Plus Scholarship 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1953 IH

1 SEC. 2. HOPE SCHOLARSHIP CREDIT AVAILABLE FOR ELE2 MENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION EX3 PENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 25A of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR HOPE SCHOLARSHIP

8 CREDIT.—In the case of the Hope Scholarship Cred9 it, the term ‘qualified tuition and related expenses’ 

10 shall include— 

11 ‘‘(A) qualified elementary and secondary 

12 education expenses (as such term would be de13 fined in section 530(b)(3) if the term ‘school’ 

14 included a home school), and 

15 ‘‘(B) any contribution or gift to the school 

16 (as defined in section 530(b)(3)(B)) at which 

17 dependents of the taxpayer are attending.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS