alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Knight *v.*Suddeth & Crenshaw.

Beck, J.

1. The remedy afforded by the provisions in the Civil Code, § 3628, for attacking a deed upon the ground of forgery, is merely cumulative. *Sibley*v. *Haslam,*75 *Ga.*493.

2. Upon an interlocutory hearing of an equitable petition for injunction the provisions of the above section of the code are not applicable; nevertheless any deed, ancient or modern, which is offered as a muniment of title, may be attacked as a forgery by any competent evidence submitted to the judge of the superior court hearing the application.

3. One of the deeds in the case at bar, which was a necessary link in the plaintiff’s chain of title, having been attacked for forgery, and the evi*232dence upon that issue being conflicting, this court will not disturb the judgment of the lower court in denying the injunction prayed for.

Submitted March 3,

Decided August 13, 1906.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court. August 3, 1905.

*W.*(?. *Harrison*by *Z. D. Harrison,*for plaintiff.

*Quincey & McDonald,*for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CLOUDFLARE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SABLE NETWORKS, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2023-1612

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-

00909, IPR2022-00228.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties, having so agreed, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The above-captioned appeal is dismissed under Fed. R. 

App. P. 42(b) with each side to bear their own costs.

July 8, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 8, 2024

 

Case: 23-1612 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 07/08/2024
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2047 

To authorize appropriations for Operation Stonegarden of the Department 

of Homeland Security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2009 

Mr. MCCAUL (for himself, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. OLSON, Mr. BILBRAY, and Mr. 

MARCHANT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for Operation Stonegarden of 

the Department of Homeland Security. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR OP4 ERATION STONEGARDEN. 

5 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec6 retary of Homeland Security $500,000,000 for each of fis7 cal years 2010 through 2014 to carry out Operation 

8 Stonegarden. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
SUNSHINE ACT NOTICES
AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, JULY 1, 2010, AT 10:00 A.M.
PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)
STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Discussion of Audit Policies and Procedures.

Report of the Audit Division on the AFL-CIO COPE PCC.
Report of the Audit Division on CWA-COPE.

Report of the Audit Division on the Tennessee Republican Party Federal Election
Account.

Report of the Audit Division on the Washington State Democratic Central
Committee.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Darlene Harris,
Deputy Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the
hearing date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: — Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220
Signed: Wi

Shawn Woodhead Werth
Secretary and Clerk of the Cémmission

Received at the FEDERAL REGISTER:

__dune 28, 2010 _
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tatina Brooks, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Tatina BrooksTatina Brooks, Senior Vice President of Accounting and
Financial Reporting (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  August 19, 2011
#### William Pollard, *Appellant, v.*Benjamin T. Babbitt, *Respon*dent.

Judgment affirmed.
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 912
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 2 of 19 Pg ID 913
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 3 of 19 Pg ID 914
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 4 of 19 Pg ID 915
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 5 of 19 Pg ID 916
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 6 of 19 Pg ID 917
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 7 of 19 Pg ID 918
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 8 of 19 Pg ID 919
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 9 of 19 Pg ID 920
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 10 of 19 Pg ID 921
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 11 of 19 Pg ID 922
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 12 of 19 Pg ID 923
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 13 of 19 Pg ID 924
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 14 of 19 Pg ID 925
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 15 of 19 Pg ID 926
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 16 of 19 Pg ID 927
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 17 of 19 Pg ID 928
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 18 of 19 Pg ID 929
2:02-cv-71854-DPH-DAS Doc # 93 Filed 03/25/05 Pg 19 of 19 Pg ID 930
**GLOBALSTAR, L.P., ADEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION**
**NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS — (Continued)**
**     ***Principlesof Consolidation*
     The consolidated financial statements include theaccounts of Globalstar and its wholly owned and majority ownedsubsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions andbalances have been eliminated.
**     ***Reclassifications*
     Certain amounts from the prior year have beenreclassified to conform to current year presentation. Thesereclassifications do not change previously reported totalassets, liabilities, partners’ capital (deficit) ornet loss.
**     ***Cashand Cash Equivalents*
     Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on handand highly liquid investments with original maturities of threemonths or less.
**     ***Concentrationof Credit Risk*
     Financial instruments which potentially subjectGlobalstar to concentrations of credit risk are cash and cashequivalents. Globalstar’s cash and cash equivalents aremaintained with high-credit-quality financial institutions. Thecreditworthiness of such institutions is generally substantialand management believes that its credit evaluation, approval andmonitoring processes mitigate potential credit risks.
**     ***Inventory*
     Inventory consists of purchased products,including fixed and mobile user terminals, accessories andgateway spare parts. Inventory is stated at lower of cost ormarket. Cost is computed using a standard cost, whichapproximates acquisition cost on a first-in, first-out basis.Globalstar provides inventory allowances for inventories with alower market value or which is slow moving. Unsalable inventoryis written off.
     In connection with the Vodafone and TE.S.A.M.transactions (see Note 4), Globalstar acquired a largenumber of user terminals and accessories. Management allocatedvalue only to inventory for which Globalstar forecasts usagethrough 2003. There is no alternative market for these products.
**     ***Propertyand Equipment*
     Property and equipment are stated at historicalcost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is providedusing the straight-line method over the estimated useful livesof the respective assets, as follows:   Globalstar System     Up to periods of 10 years from commencement    of service in the first quarter of 2000    Furniture, fixtures & equipment     3 to 10 years    Leasehold improvements     Shorter of lease term or the estimated useful    lives of the improvements    
**     ***GlobalstarSystem*
     The Globalstar System includes costs for thedesign, manufacture, test, and launch of a constellation oflow-earth orbit satellites, including in-orbit spare satellites(the “Space Segment”), and ground and satelliteoperations control centers, gateways and user terminals (the“Ground Segment”).
     Losses from in-orbit failures ofGlobalstar’s satellites, net of insurance proceeds, arerecorded in the period it is determined that the satellite isnot recoverable.
S-9
§ 131.575 Yearly inspections and repair. ( a ) Each lifeboat, rescue boat, rigid liferaft, buoyant apparatus, and life float must be stripped, cleaned, and thoroughly inspected and repaired as needed at least once a year. This procedure includes emptying and cleaning each fuel tank and refilling it with fresh fuel.
( b ) Each davit, winch, fall, and other launching-appliance must be thoroughly inspected at least once a year, and repaired as needed.
( c ) Each item of survival equipment with an expiration date must be replaced during the annual inspection and repair if this date has passed.
( d ) Each battery used in an item of survival equipment and clearly marked with an expiration date must be replaced during the annual inspection and repair if this date has passed.
( e ) Except a storage battery used in a lifeboat or in a rescue boat, each battery used in an item of survival equipment and not clearly marked with an expiration date must be replaced during the annual inspection and repair.
( f ) Compliance with the requirements of this section does not relieve the master or person in charge of the duty of compliance with requirements in § 131.540(a) of this subpart to keep the equipment ready for immediate use when the vessel is under way.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kim Mayyasi, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                  |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: March 31, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Kim MayyasiKim Mayyasi President and Chief Executive Officer
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT 

RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. 

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy 

permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free 

electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the 

filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each 

document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free 

copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

District of Columbia

Notice of Electronic Filing 

The following transaction was entered on 3/12/2013 at 9:58 AM and filed on 3/12/2013 

Docket Text: 

MINUTE ORDER LIFTING STAY. In light of FEC's decision to not undertake a rulemaking 

in response to the petition filed by intervenor Center for Individual Freedom, and to 

defend the existing regulation, it is ORDERED that the stay in this case is lifted. Signed 

by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 3/12/2013. (lcabj2) 

1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

David Brett Kolker dkolker@fec.gov, JSadio@fec.gov, RFreeman@fec.gov, vgraham@fec.gov 

Holly Jean Baker hbaker@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, hsummers@fec.gov, jsadio@fec.gov, 

rfreeman@fec.gov, vgraham@fec.gov 

Harry Jacobs Summers hsummers@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, jsadio@fec.gov, rfreeman@fec.gov, 

vgraham@fec.gov 

Roger Michael Witten roger.witten@wilmerhale.com, whmao@wilmerhale.com 

Activity in Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ VAN HOLLEN v. FEDERAL ELECTION 

COMMISSION Order lifting stay 

DCD_ECFNotice 

to: 

DCD_ECFNotice 

03/12/2013 10:00 AM 

Hide Details 

From: DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov 

To: DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov, 

Case Name: VAN HOLLEN v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Case Number: 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ

Filer:

Document Number:No document attached 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Users\rfreeman\AppData\Local\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3902.htm 3/12/2013
Thomas Wesley Kirby tkirby@wileyrein.com, awoodson@wileyrein.com, bzehr@wileyrein.com, 

cburns@wileyrein.com, jbaran@wileyrein.com 

Seth E. Nesin snesin@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, jsadio@fec.gov, rfreeman@fec.gov, 

vgraham@fec.gov 

Jason B. Torchinsky jtorchinsky@holtzmanlaw.net, mbayes@holtzmanlaw.net 

Fiona J. Kaye fiona.kaye@wilmerhale.com 

1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Notice will be delivered by other means to:: 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Users\rfreeman\AppData\Local\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3902.htm 3/12/2013
#### Cyrene Whitney *v.*Susan Whitney *&*a.

In a devise of an estate in lands to take effect in possession immediately upon tlie testator’s death, words of survivorship are to bo referred to the time of the testator’s death, unless a different reference is provided.

Where real estate was devised in fee to A. B. C. and D, as tenants in common, with a provision, if either of the devisees “or more than one of them die,” giving his or their share “to those that are living, to be divided equally among them;” and after the death of the testator, A. died seized of the share devised to him, intestate, and without lineal descendants; *held,*that the widow of A. was entitled to dower in his share, and, under the statutes of this State, to one-half of the residue of such share in fee, although B. C. and D. were living.

*312All the parties in this ease claim under the following provisions in the will of Caleb M. Whitney, to wit:

" I further give and devise to my two sisters, Margaret Ann Whitney and Mary Elizabeth Whitney, and my two brothers, William Whitney and Charles Whitney, all my real estate ip Tuftonborough, in the County of Strafford, to have and to hold the same to them, the said Margaret Ann, Mary Elizabeth, William and Charles Whitney, their heirs and assigns forever. The above mentioned real estate is to divided as follows, to wit: one-third to Margaret Ann Whitney, one-third to Mary Elizabeth Whitney, and one-third equally between William Whitney and Charles Whitney; and should either of my above named brothers or sisters, or more than one of them die, I give and bequeath his, her or their dower to those that are living, to be divided equally among them.”

The will of Caleb M. Whitney was duly executed and was approved Nov. 3, 1840; Susan Whitney is the mother of Margaret, Mary, and William, the *other*defendants, and *of*Charles, and Cyrene is the widow of Charles, who died in 1857, after the death of the testator, seized of his share of the premises, intestate, and without issue, and William, Margaret and Mary are still living.

*L. D. Sawyer wad. Garter,*for petitioner.

*Batchelder,*for petitionees.

Bartlett, J.

By the will the devisees were to take an estate in fee as tenants in common, E. S. ch. 129, sec. 2 ; and this devise was to take effect in possession immediately on the testator’s decease. The words of survivorship are therefore to be regarded as providing for the case of the deaths of any of the devisees in the testator’s life-time. 2 Jarm. 632; 6 Cruise (Gr. Ed.) 340, & n.; *Ashford*v. *Haines,*11 L. & Eq. 152; *Gee*v. *Mayor,*10 L. *&*Eq. 455; *Brimmer*v. *Sohier, 1*Cush. 118.

Charles Whitney having died seized of one-sixth part of the premises, without any lineal descendants, and intestate, the petitioner is entitled to dower in his share of the real estate, and, under our statutes, to one-half of the residue of such share in fee. *Robinson*v. *Tuttle,*37 N. H. 243, 250 and 251.
§ 125.120 Carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk by OSVs of less than 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned). ( a ) Except as provided by this section, no OSV of less than 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) may carry a noxious liquid substance (NLS) in bulk without the approval of the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( b ) An OSV may carry in integral and fixed independent tanks NLSs listed by § 153.2 of this chapter, in quantities not to exceed 20 percent of the vessel's deadweight.
( c ) Each OSV carrying NLSs in bulk in integral tanks or fixed independent tanks must— ( 1 ) Meet the definition of oceangoing in 33 CFR 151.05;
( 2 ) Have a Certificate of Inspection or NLS Certificate (issued by the Coast Guard) endorsed with the name of the NLS cargo; and
( 3 ) Have the Cargo Record Book prescribed in § 153.490(a)(1) of this chapter.
( d ) An OSV that does not meet the equipment requirements in §§ 153.470 through 153.491 of this chapter may not discharge NLS residues to the sea. The vessel's Certificate of Inspection or NLS Certificate will contain this restriction.
( e ) Each OSV that discharges NLS residues to the sea must meet— ( 1 ) The equipment requirements in §§ 153.470 through 153.491 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) The operating requirements in §§ 153.901, 153.903, 153.909, and 153.1100 of this chapter.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49321, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49234, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59781, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48933, Aug. 18, 2014]
Order entered March 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01269-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS EZPAWN, L.P. D/B/A EZMONEY LOAN SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03373-A

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and 

appellee’s response opposing the motion. The motion is GRANTED and the supplemental brief, 

which was filed on March 15, 2013, is considered filed as of the date of this order. No further 

motions or responses will be permitted. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William W. Harrod, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                  
|------------------
|DATE: May 14, 2003
|                  



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Capital, Inc. and will be retained by First Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 210 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study on the 

acquisition of a parcel of land adjacent to Beaufort National Cemetery, 

Beaufort, South Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a 

study on the acquisition of a parcel of land adjacent 

to Beaufort National Cemetery, Beaufort, South Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON ACQUISITION OF LAND ADJACENT 

4 TO BEAUFORT NATIONAL CEMETERY. 

5 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Veterans 

6 Affairs shall conduct a study on the acquisition, in accord7 ance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, of 

8 the parcel of land described in subsection (b) to be used 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 210 IH

1 for the expansion of the Beaufort National Cemetery, 

2 Beaufort, South Carolina. 

3 (b) PARCEL DESCRIBED.—The parcel of land de4 scribed in this subsection is a parcel of land consisting 

5 of approximately 4.9 acres located on 17th Street in Beau6 fort, South Carolina, as depicted on tax map number 120– 

7 1–238 dated May 4, 1998. 

8 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

10 of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a report on 

11 the study conducted under subsection (a). 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS