alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 264.70 What makes a State eligible to receive a provisional payment of contingency funds? ( a ) In order to receive a provisional payment of contingency funds, a State must: ( 1 ) Be a needy State, as defined in § 260.30 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Submit to ACF a request for contingency funds for an eligible month (i.e., a month in which a State is a needy State).
( b ) A determination that a State is a needy State for a month makes that State eligible to receive a provisional payment of contingency funds for two consecutive months.
( c ) Only the 50 States and the District of Columbia may receive contingency funds. Territories and Tribal TANF grantees are not eligible.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Health  Express USA, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended March 27, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date May 27, 2005                     By:       /s/ Douglas Baker
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Douglas Baker
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Health Express
USA, Inc. and will be retained by Health  Express USA, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1
# CE2009295EN.01009701.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 295/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 295/97

---

Tuesday 2 September 2008Involvement of the chairs of subcomittees (interpretation of Rule182)

P6_TA(2008)0388

European Parliament decision of 2 September 2008 on interpretation of Rule 182 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure on the involvement of the chairs of subcommittees

2009/C 295 E/24

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the letter of 22 July 2008 from the chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

having regard to Rule 201 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 182(1):
  This Rule 182(1) does not preclude the chair of the main committee from involving the chairs of the subcommittees in the work of the bureau or from permitting them to chair debates on issues specifically dealt with by the subcommittees in question — indeed, it allows this — provided that this way of proceeding is submitted to the bureau in its entirety for its consideration and that it receives the bureau's agreement |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 182(1):

This Rule 182(1) does not preclude the chair of the main committee from involving the chairs of the subcommittees in the work of the bureau or from permitting them to chair debates on issues specifically dealt with by the subcommittees in question — indeed, it allows this — provided that this way of proceeding is submitted to the bureau in its entirety for its consideration and that it receives the bureau's agreement

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
#### Burling v. Freeman.

*Jurisdiction*— *of county court—when objection to must be taken.*

In an action in a county court the complaint was silent as to the residence of defendants, bur they appeared and answered, and made no objection to the jurisdiction of the court. *Held,*that it was too late after judgment to take the objection that the court had not jurisdiction, because it did not appear in the record that defendants were residents of the county.

Appeal by defendants from an order of the Kings county court denying a motion to set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The judgment had been rendered in an action for the possession of personal property, brought by Mary Burling against Luke Freeman and others.

*Anthony Barrett,*for appellants.

*T. O. Connor,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The only question passed upon in the opinion is fully set forth in the head-note.

*Order affirmed.*
#### Smith *v.*The State.

Beck, J.

1. Where the question as to whether the deceased had a pistol in his possession and drew the same from his pocket at the time of the homicide was a contested issue on the trial, and both the State and the accused submitted testimony relative thereto, evidence alleged in a ground of a motion for a new trial to be newly discovered, that a pistol cartridge was found in the pocket of a vest worn by deceased at the time he was slain, if not merely cumulative and corroborative of the defendant’s witnesses introduced on the trial, was not of such gravity and probative valtte as to require the granting of a new trial on that ground.

2. A ground of a motion complaining that the court erred “in ruling out the following testimony of S., ‘As if trying to see what was going on in the room,’ ” does not raise any question for decision by this court, since it is impossible, without searching in the brief of evidence for the con*804text which would render the fragmentary extract from the evidence intelligible, to discover whether the evidence repelled was material or not. *Holland*v. *Williams,*ante, 617.

Argued October 18,

Decided November 16, 1906.

Indictment for murder. Before- Judge Reagan. Monroe superior court. August 27, 1906.

*Gabaniss & Willingham, B. L.*Berner, and *J. M. Fletcher,*for plaintiff in error. *John G. Iiart, attorney-general,*and *O. II.*B. *Bloodworth, solicitor-general,*contra.

3. Evidence tending to show that an assault by the father of the accused upon the deceased and a companion of the deceased was made without provocation was not immaterial or irrelevant; it appearing that simultaneously with the assault the accused fired the fatal shot, and the jury-having, under the issues of fact made by this evidence, to decide whether the homicide, if not justifiable, was murder or voluntary manslaughter. Whether the State should be permitted to introduce this evidence after the defendant had closed his testimony, even if it was not strictly in. rebuttal, was a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court.

4. No error appears in any of the other rulings complained of. The evidence authorized the verdict, and this court will not interfere with the judgment refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

| (1)                   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)                   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                          |   |   |                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|
| By:*/s/              Edward J. Lawson*                                        |   |   |                                |
|  **Edward              J. Lawson, Chief Executive              Officer** |   |   | **May 12,              2006**  |
|                                                                          |   |   |                                |

----
§ 120.432 Emergency lighting. ( a ) Each vessel must have adequate emergency lighting fitted along the line of escape to the main deck from all passenger and crew accommodation spaces located below the main deck.
( b ) The emergency lighting required by paragraph (a) of this section must automatically actuate upon failure of the main lighting system. If a vessel is not equipped with a single source of power for emergency lighting, it must have individual battery powered lights which: ( 1 ) Are automatically actuated upon loss of normal power;
( 2 ) Are not readily portable;
( 3 ) Are connected to an automatic battery charger; and
( 4 ) Have sufficient capacity for a minimum of 2 hours of continuous operation.
( c ) A vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length carrying more than 600 passengers or with overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers must have an emergency lighting system that complies with Part 112 in subchapter J of this chapter.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 928, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, March 12, 2007, 8 a.m. to March 12, 2007, 5 p.m. Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 13, 2007, 72 FR 6740.                 

The meeting will be held on the same date at the Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion and will end at 3 p.m. rather than 5 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: February 26, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1020 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 108.161 Dead end corridors.

No dead end corridor may be more than 13 meters (43 feet) long.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, March 20, 2007. (The time of this 
meeting has changed to 12:30 p.m.)

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The two items are open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    7870: Railroad Accident Report--Collision Of Two CN Freight Trains, 
Anding, Mississippi, July 10, 2005 (DCA-05-MR-011).
    7834A: Marine Accident Brief and Safety Recommendation Letter--Fire 
on Board U.S. Small Passenger Vessel Massachusetts, Boston Harbor, 
Massachusetts, June 12, 2006.

News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100. Individuals requesting 
specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 
by Friday, March 16, 2007.
    The public may view the meting via alive or archived Webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D' Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: March 13, 2007.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-1283 Filed 3-13-07; 12:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Behavior ProblemsElementary EducationInterpersonal CommunicationLearning ProblemsParent School RelationshipParent Student RelationshipParent Teacher ConferencesParent Teacher Cooperation

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-08559) of InVision Technologies, Inc. of
our report dated February 20, 1997, appearing in the 1996 Annual Report to
Stockholders which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected Consolidated
Financial Data contained in the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders insofar as
it relates to each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996.
However, it should be noted that Price Waterhouse LLP has not prepared or
certified such Selected Consolidated Financial Data.



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
----------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP


San Jose, California
March 31, 1997
§ 112.05-7 Use of emergency generator in port. The emergency generator may be used during lay time in port for supplying power to the vessels, provided the following: ( a ) The fuel oil tank for the emergency generator prime mover must be appropriately sized and provided with a level alarm, which is to be set to alarm at a level where there is sufficient fuel oil capacity for the emergency services for the period of time required by § 112.05-5(a).
( b ) The emergency generator prime mover is to be rated for continuous service.
( c ) The prime mover is to be fitted with alarms, displays and automatic shutdown arrangements that meet ABS Marine Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference, see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter), section 4-8-2/5.19 Table 2, except that for fuel oil tank low-level alarm, in paragraph (a) of this section is to apply instead. The displays and alarms are to be provided in the centralized control station. Monitoring at the engineers' quarters must meet ABS Marine Vessel Rules, section 4-9-6/19.
( d ) The emergency generator room is to be fitted with fire detectors. Where the emergency generator is located in a space separated from the emergency switchboard, fire detectors are to be located in each space. The fire detection and alarm system must meet the requirements of subpart 113.10 of this subchapter.
( e ) The power supply circuits, including control and monitoring circuits, for the use of an emergency generator in port are to be so arranged and protected that any electrical fault, except for the emergency generator and the emergency switchboard, will not affect the operation of the main and emergency services.
( f ) Means are to be provided to readily change over to emergency operation.
( g ) The generator is to be safeguarded against overload by automatically shedding such other loads so that the supply to the required emergency loads is always available.
( h ) Operational instructions such as that on the fuel oil tank level, harbor/seagoing mode changeover arrangements, etc. are to be provided on board. Before the vessel is under way, all valves, switches, etc., are to be in the positions for the intended mode of operation of the emergency generator and the emergency switchboard. Such instructions are to be distinctly posted at the emergency generator room. Planned maintenance is to be carried out only while in port.
[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16368, Mar. 16, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff -Respondent, Case No. 14-cr-20427 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

JOSEPH LARMONT JEFFERY, 

 Defendant-Petitioner. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER DIRECTING ADDITIONAL RESPONSE 

On May 19, 2015, Defendant-Petitioner Joseph Larmont Jeffrey was sentenced to 140 

months of incarceration for distributing cocaine base and aiding and abetting the same. ECF No. 

157. Jeffrey did not appeal. On March 28, 2016, Jeffrey filed a motion for relief. ECF No. 213. 

On April 12, 2016, Jeffrey clarified that he was requesting relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF 

No. 219. On September 26, 2016, Jeffrey filed a motion to amend his motion to vacate his 

sentence. ECF No. 245. Each of these motions have been referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. 

Morris. ECF Nos. 221, 246. 

On October 25, 2016, Judge Morris issued a report recommending that Jeffrey’s motions 

be denied and the case dismissed. ECF No. 247. Jeffrey filed a letter which contained two 

objections on November 16, 2016. First, Jeffrey argues that subsequent case law developments 

impact his claims. Specifically, Jeffrey references United States v. Hinkle, 832 F.3d 569 (5th Cir. 

2016) and Hill v. Masters, 836 F.3d 591 (6th Cir. 2016). In Hinkle, the Fifth Circuit extended the 

Supreme Court’s rationale in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), to predicate drug 

offenses under the Career Offender Guidelines. Because Jeffrey was sentenced under United 

States Sentencing Guideline § 4B.1.1 and not the residual clause in § 4B1.2(a), Hinkle may be 

1:14-cr-20427-TLL-PTM Doc # 256 Filed 01/10/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1760
- 2 - 

instructive. Second, Jeffrey objects that he did not have two prior controlled substance 

convictions because he was only arrested once, on the same day. He argues that the single 

investigation and arrest should correspond to only one predicate drug charge, not two. 

On December 12, 2016, the Court ordered the Government to respond to Jeffrey’s letter. 

On December 19, 2016, the Government filed a response which addressed only Jeffrey’s second 

objection. Because the Government’s response to Jeffrey’s letter was nonresponsive to Jeffrey’s 

first argument, a supplemental response will be ordered. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Government is DIRECTED to file a 

supplemental response to Defendant’s letter, ECF No. 248, addressing Jeffrey’s arguments 

regarding United States v. Hinkle, 832 F.3d 569 (5th Cir. 2016), on or before January 17, 2017. 

Dated: January 10, 2017 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on January 10, 2017. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20427-TLL-PTM Doc # 256 Filed 01/10/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1761
EX-31.01


CERTIFICATION

I, Harry Masuda, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Human
BioSystems;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)] for the registrant and we have:

a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c.      disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 23 , 2004

/s/ Harry Masuda ------------------
Harry Masuda
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer