alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.1124 Discharges of Category D NLS residue. NLS residue from Category D NLSs must be discharged to a reception facility or discharged to the sea using the following procedure: ( a ) Before discharge begins, drain or flush the NLS residue in the tank's piping systems into the tank.
( b ) After draining or flushing, discharge the NLS residue to the sea in accordance with § 153.1128 or transfer it to a slop tank and discharge in accordance with § 153.1126.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2034 

To permit refinancing of certain loans under the Rural Housing Service 

program for guaranteed loans for rural housing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2009 

Mr. CLAY (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. WATERS, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. MEEKS of New York, and Mr. HODES) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To permit refinancing of certain loans under the Rural Housing Service program for guaranteed loans for rural housing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Homeowners 

5 Protection Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LOAN GUARANTEE PRO7 GRAM. 

8 Subsection (h) of section 502 of the Housing Act of 

9 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472(h)) is amended— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2034 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (5)(A), by striking ‘‘paragraph 

2 (13)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (15)’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘1 percent’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘2 percent’’; 

5 (3) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘REFI6 NANCING’’ and inserting ‘‘MODIFICATION OF GUAR7 ANTEED LOANS’’; 

8 (4) in paragraph (14)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘GUARANTEES FOR REFI10 NANCING LOANS’’ and inserting ‘‘REFINANCING

11 OF LOANS MADE OR GUARANTEED BY SEC12 RETARY’’; and 

13 (B) in subparagraph (E)— 

14 (i) by striking ‘‘(10)’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘(12)’’; and 

16 (ii) by striking ‘‘(13)’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘(9) or of paragraphs (11) through (14)’’; 

18 (5) by redesignating paragraphs (10), (11), 

19 (12), (13), and (14) as paragraphs (12), (13), (14), 

20 (15), and (10), respectively; 

21 (6) by transferring and inserting paragraph 

22 (10), as so redesignated by paragraph (5) of this 

23 subsection, after paragraph (9); and 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2034 IH

1 (7) by inserting after paragraph (10), as so re2 designated and transferred by paragraphs (5) and 

3 (6) of this subsection, the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(11) REFINANCING OF LOANS MADE BY PRI5 VATE SECTOR LENDERS.— 

6 ‘‘(A) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary may, in 

7 accordance with this paragraph, guarantee a 

8 loan made to refinance a loan made by a pri9 vate lender to an individual to acquire or con10 struct a single-family residence. 

11 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBILITY.—Except as provided in 

12 subparagraph (C), all requirements of this sub13 section shall apply to loans guaranteed and loan 

14 guarantees made under this paragraph. 

15 ‘‘(C) GUARANTEE FEE.—Notwithstanding 

16 paragraph (8), the Secretary shall charge a 

17 guarantee fee with respect to loans guaranteed 

18 under this paragraph at levels necessary, but no 

19 higher than needed, to allow such class of loans 

20 to be guaranteed without resulting in a need for 

21 an appropriation for a credit subsidy.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Yates v. Sammond.

Appeal "by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought in Kings county by Robert Yates against John Sammond to recover moneys deposited with defendant, a stock broker, as a margin, and also the profits of a certain purchase and sale of stock made by defendant for plaintiff.

*Beach & Beman*and *J. S. L. Cummins,*for appellant.

*Abel Crook,*for respondent.

Tappen, J.

The judgment was affirmed on the ground that the question was one of fact, that the decision of the referee being upon conflicting evidence, would not be interfered with.

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Donnie Sims,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-13381

Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Corporation, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING

5/20/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff filed this action asserting claims against two Defendants. Defendants removed

the action to federal court on September 2, 2014.

On October 10, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 5). That

motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Steven Whalen for a Report and Recommendation.

On May 20, 2015, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation

(Docket Entry No. 7) wherein he recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion to

Dismiss.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the

magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id. 

1

2:14-cv-13381-SFC-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 06/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 212
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither

party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the May 20, 2015 R&R. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and

Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: June 12, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

June 12, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-13381-SFC-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 06/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 213
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2140 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the withholding 

requirement with respect to proceeds from certain pari-mutuel wagers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2009 

Mr. YARMUTH (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the withholding requirement with respect to proceeds 

from certain pari-mutuel wagers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parimutuel Conformity 

5 and Equality Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENT 

7 FOR PROCEEDS FROM PARIMUTUEL POOL 

8 WAGERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2140 IH

1 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 3402(q)(3) of 

2 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

3 winnings which are subject to withholding) is 

4 amended— 

5 (A) by striking clause (ii), 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘, or’’ at the end of clause 

7 (i) and inserting a period, and 

8 (C) by striking ‘‘(C) SWEEPSTAKES, WA9 GERING POOLS, CERTAIN PARIMUTUEL POOLS’’ 

10 and all that follows through ‘‘(ii) a wager’’ and 

11 inserting the following: 

12 ‘‘(C) SWEEPSTAKES, WAGERING POOLS, 

13 AND LOTTERIES.—Proceeds of more than 

14 $5,000 from a wager’’. 

15 (2) Paragraph (5) of section 3402(q) of such 

16 Code (relating to exemption for bingo, keno, and slot 

17 machines) is amended— 

18 (A) by inserting ‘‘proceeds from a wager19 ing transaction in a parimutuel pool with re20 spect to horse races, dog races, or jai alai, and’’ 

21 after ‘‘shall not apply to’’, and 

22 (B) by inserting ‘‘CERTAIN PARIMUTUEL

23 POOLS,’’ before ‘‘BINGO’’ in the heading thereof. 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

3 

•HR 2140 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid after the date of 

3 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
From: Paulson, Christine [DNR]

To: Bhesania, Amy

Cc: Algoe-Eakin, Amy ; Jay, Michael ; McGraw, Jim [DNR] ; Walker, Wendy [DNR] ; Johnson, Matthew [DNR] ; Tapp, Joshua

Subject: IDNR PM2.6 Infrastructure SIP: Clarification of SMC withdrawal

Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:56:25 AM

Amy,

In response to your request, please accept the following clarification regarding the PM2.5 Significant Monitoring Concentrations

(SMC) included in Iowa’s Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Iowa DNR sent the SIP to Regional Administrator

Brooks on July 23, 2013. In reference to the SMC, the cover letter for the submittal states:

· Item 3: Amendment to subrule 33.3(9) to adopt by reference 52.21(i), except that the October 20, 2010,

amendments to 40 CFR 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c) (adding the PM2.5 SMC) shall not be included in the revisions to Iowa’s SIP.

To clarify, it is Iowa DNR’s intention that PM2.5 remain on the list of pollutants, but that the associated concentration level would

be blank or zero. In other words, PM2.5 pre-construction monitoring would continue to apply but without de minimis thresholds.

If you need anything further or have any additional questions, please let us know.

Best regards,

Christine

Please note my new phone number below.

CHRISTINE PAULSON Environmental Specialist Senior

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

P 515.725.9510 | christine.paulson@dnr.iowa.gov

Air Quality Bureau | 7900 Hickman Rd., Ste 1 | Windsor Heights, IA 50324

www.IowaCleanAir.gov | Air Construction Permit Hotline 877.247.4692

WWW.IOWADNR.GOV

Leading Iowans in Caring for Our Natural Resources.
#### § 630.625 Criminal drug statute.

*Criminal drug statute* means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any controlled substance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RYAN STANFORD LEE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 500 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Reuben Leffingwell, as Administrator, etc., of James B. Littlefield, *Deceased*.

Motion to strike cause from preferred calendar granted, and case ordered to take its place on the general calendar.
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-71767-LPZ Document 47 Filed 07/11/03 Page 14 of 14
§ 132.370 Added requirements for fixed independent and portable tanks. ( a ) When carrying fixed independent tanks on deck or portable tanks in compliance with § 125.110 of this subchapter, each vessel must also comply with §§ 98.30-37 and 98.30-39 of this chapter.
( b ) When carrying portable tanks in compliance with § 125.120 of this subchapter, each vessel must also comply with 49 CFR 176.315.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Matrixx  Initiatives,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Carl J.  Johnson,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ CARL J. JOHNSON
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Carl J. Johnson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated March 26, 2003
§ 15.915 Engineer officer endorsements. The following licenses and MMC officer endorsements authorize the holder to serve as noted, within any restrictions on the license or MMC, and as provided by § 15.401 of this part: ( a ) A designated duty engineer license or endorsement authorizes service as chief or assistant engineer on vessels of less than 500 GT in the following manners: ( 1 ) A designated duty engineer limited to vessels of less than 1,000 horsepower or less than 4,000 horsepower may serve only on near-coastal, Great Lakes, or inland waters.
( 2 ) A designated duty engineer with no horsepower limitations may serve on any waters.
( 3 ) When serving on a vessel to which STCW applies, the appropriate STCW endorsement must also be held.
( b ) A chief engineer (limited) license or endorsement authorizes service as chief or assistant engineer on vessels of any gross tons on inland waters and of less than 1,600 GRT on ocean, near-coastal, or Great Lakes waters.
( c ) An assistant engineer (limited) license or endorsement authorizes service on vessels of any gross tons on inland waters and of less than 1,600 GRT on ocean, near-coastal, or Great Lakes waters.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78010, Dec. 24, 2013]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1879 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and 

reemployment rights for certain individuals ordered to full-time National 

Guard duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado (for himself and Ms. BORDALLO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and reemployment rights for certain individuals 

ordered to full-time National Guard duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Em5 ployment Protection Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS FOLLOWING CERTAIN NA7 TIONAL GUARD DUTY. 

8 (a) REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS.—Section 4312(c)(4) of 

9 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1879 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

2 (D); 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub4 paragraph (E) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(F) ordered to full-time National Guard 

8 duty under the provisions of section 502(f) of 

9 title 32 when the period of duty is designated 

10 by the Secretary of Defense as covered by this 

11 subparagraph.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subparagraph (F) of section 

13 4312(c)(4) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 

14 subsection (a), shall apply with respect to an individual 

15 ordered to full-time National Guard duty under section 

16 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, on or after Sep17 tember 11, 2001, and shall entitle such individual to rights 

18 and benefits under chapter 43 of title 38 of such Code 

19 on or after that date. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. GEORGE PETRY and the said GEORGE PETRY, Respondents, *v.*HENRY S. DE BEVOISE, Appellant.

*Practice*— *action to try title to office*— the *claimant may he joined as a party plain*tiff— *Code of Giwil Procedure, sec.*446.

To an action of *quo waircmio,*brought by the people upon the relation of one claiming to be entitled to an office held by the defendant, the claimant is, under the Code of Civil Procedure, a proper, if not a necessary party plaintiff.

Appeal from an interlocutory judgment, entered upon an order overruling a demurrer interposed to the complaint on the ground *597that there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff. The action was brought by the people, on the relation of George Petry, to oust the defendant from the office of mayor of Long Island City and have Petry declared entitled thereto.

*J, Ralph Burnett,*for the appellant.

*Leslie W. Russell,*attorney-general, and *A. T. P ayne*and *Homer A. Nelson,*for the respondents.

Cullen, J.:

We think that Petry is a proper party plaintiff to this action. He certainly has an interest in the subject-matter and in obtaining the judgment demanded. This, under section446, Code of CivilProcedure, justifies his appearance as plaintiff. Under the former Code he would have been a necessary party. *(People ex rel. Crane*v. *Ryder,*12 N. Y., 433.) It may be that since the change in phraseology of the new Code he is not now a necessary party, but we do not think he has ceased to be a proper party. The statement in the complaint, “ The People complaining on the relation of George Petry,” is a sufficient allegation that the action is brought on the relation of Petry, especially as Petry joins in it. We doubt if a defect in that respect would be ground for a demurrer.

Order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer over on payment of costs.

Present — Dykman and Cullen, JJ.; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to answer in twenty days on payment of costs.
#### § 126.225 Alternate tonnage for offshore supply vessels seeking oil spill response vessel certification.

An offshore supply vessel certificated under this subchapter that is less than 500 gross register tons (GRT) as measured under section 14502 of Title 46, United States Code, or 6,000 gross tonnage (GT ITC) as measured under section 14302 of Title 46, United States Code when GRT is not assigned, may also be certificated as an oil spill response vessel.

[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49324, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2011-0966, 76 FR 77131, Dec. 12, 2011]
§ 12.201 General requirements for national and STCW rating endorsements. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) An MMC issued to a deck or engineer officer will be endorsed for all entry-level ratings and any other ratings for which they qualify under this part. An applicant for any STCW endorsement must hold the appropriate national endorsement, unless otherwise specified.
( 2 ) The authorized holder of any valid rating endorsement may serve in any capacity in the staff department of a vessel, except in those capacities requiring a staff officer; except that whenever the service includes the handling of food, no person may be so employed unless his or her credential bears the food handler's endorsement indicated by the notation “(F.H.)”.
( 3 ) When an applicant meets the requirements for certification set forth in this part, the Coast Guard will issue the appropriate endorsement.
( b ) *Physical and medical requirements.* The physical and medical requirements applicable to the endorsements in this subpart are found in 46 CFR part 10, subpart C.
Figure 5 data from Sather et al., Baseline ambient gaseous ammonia concentrations in the Four Corners area and eastern Oklahoma , USA, J. Environ. Monit ., 2008, 10 , 1319-1325. Passive ammonia data time series for the Four Corners area sites; 3-week integrated samples; ending dates 1/3/08 for Southern U te and 1/22/08 for Mesa Verde NP. units=ppb ending date (2007) Substation Farmington Airport Navajo Lake Southern Ute Mesa Verde NP 2-Jan 0.6 1.5 0 0.7 0.1 23-Jan 0.5 1.4 0 0.8 0 13-Feb 0.5 1.8 0.2 0.9 0.4 6-Mar 0.2 0.5 0 0.3 0 27-Mar 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.1 17-Apr 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.6 0.2 8-May 0.8 1.3 0.4 1.5 0.3 29-May 0.6 1.3 0.3 1 0.2 19-Jun 0.5 1.1 0.2 0.8 0.3 10-Jul 0.8 1.3 0.4 1.2 0.3 31-Jul 2.1 2.9 0.5 1.5 0.6 21-Aug 1.5 2.4 0.3 0.9 0.5 11-Sep 1.4 1.6 0.3 0.8 0.2 2-Oct 1.8 1.7 0.2 0.7 0.2 23-Oct 3.5 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.2 13-Nov 3 1.4 0 0.4 0 4-Dec 1.1 1.6 0.2 0.9 0.1 31-Dec 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.6 0 AVERAGE 1.133333333 1.472222222 0.2 0.827777778 0.205555556

estimated ammonia background per month (ppb) Mesa Verde NP (avg) Four Corners area (5 site average) Jan 0 0.5 January estimate uses Jan 23 (end date) data averages Feb 0.2 0.5 February estimate uses Feb 13 and Mar 6 data averages Mar 0.1 0.6 March estimate uses Mar 27 data averages Apr 0.3 0.7 April estimate uses Apr 17 and May 8 data averages May 0.2 0.7 May estimate uses May 29 data averages Jun 0.3 0.7 June estimate uses Jun 19 and Jul 10 data averages Jul 0.6 1.5 July estimate uses Jul 31 data averages Aug 0.5 1.1 August estimate uses Aug 21 data averages Sep 0.2 0.9 September estimate uses Sept 11 and Oct 2 data averages Oct 0.2 1.1 October estimate uses Oct 23 data averages Nov 0.1 0.9 November estimate uses Nov 13 and Dec 4 data averages Dec 0.1 0.5 December estimate uses Jan 2 and Dec 31 data averages AVERAGE 0.876587302

Mesa Verde NP (max) Four Corners area (5 site max.) Jan 0 1.4 January estimate uses Jan 23 (end date) data max. Feb 0.4 1.8 February estimate uses Feb 13 and Mar 6 data max. Mar 0.1 1.4 March estimate uses Mar 27 data max. Apr 0.3 1.5 April estimate uses Apr 17 and May 8 data max. May 0.2 1.3 May estimate uses May 29 data max. Jun 0.3 1.3 June estimate uses Jun 19 and Jul 10 data max. Jul 0.6 2.9 July estimate uses Jul 31 data max. Aug 0.5 2.4 August estimate uses Aug 21 data max. Sep 0.2 1.8 September estimate uses Sept 11 and Oct 2 data max. Oct 0.2 3.5 October estimate uses Oct 23 data max. Nov 0.1 3 November estimate uses Nov 13 and Dec 4 data max. Dec 0.1 1.5 December estimate uses Jan 2 and Dec 31 data max. AVERAGE 1.738439153