Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 61092 Su m m ar y Cal endar J U AN CARLO S AJ EATAS YAT , P et i t i on er v. E R IC H . H O L D E R , U .S . A T T O R N E YG E N E R A L , Res po nde nt Pet i t i o n f

o rRev i e w o f

a n Ord e ro f

t he B o a r do f Im m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls B IAN o. A 72 452 799 B ef ore D AV IS, ST E W A R T , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Ju an C arl os Aj eatas Y at, a n ative an d cit i zen of G u atem al a, p et i t i on s f or revi ew of

t h e B oard of Im m i grati on A pp eal s’ ( B IA) den i alof hi s app l i cat i on f

or c anc e l l at i o n of

re m o va lpur s uantt o §2 03 (b) of t he N i c ar ag uan Adj us t m e nta nd C ent r alA m er i c an R eli ef A c t( N A C A R A) , Pu b . L. N o. 105- 100, 111 St at . 2160, 2 1 9 8
- 9 9 ( 1 9 9 7 ) . Y a ta r g u e s t h a tt h e BIA e r r e di n f i n d i n gt h a th e h a dn o ts h o wn s u ffic ie n t h a r d s h ip to w a r r a n t c a n c e lla tio n o f r e m o v a l. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust25, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 61092

2 S ect i on 203 of

N A C A R Aam en ded § 309(f ) of t h e I l l egal Im m igr a tion R eform an dI m m i gr a n t R esp on sibi l i ty A ct of 19 9 6 , P u b . L . N o. 1 0 4 -20 8 , 11 0 S tat. 300 9, t o est abli sh rules t o perm i tcer t ai n cl asses of a l i en s, incl u di n g t h ose f rom G uat e m al a, t o a pp l y forc anc e l l at i o n o f r e m o va lund e rw hati s t i t l e d the

“ SP E C IA L R U LE F O R C A N C E LL A TIO N O F R E M O VA L. ” 111 St at . 2160, 219 8- 99. P u rsuan tto t h e “ speci alrul e, ” el i gibl e al i en s m ay seek can cel l ati on of rem ov a lu n d er Im m i gr a ti on an dN a ti on a l i ty A ct (IN A) § 2 4 0 A( cod i fi edat 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b ). I

d. To s uc c e e d, t he a ppli c antm us ts ho w , i nt e ra l i a, t hat( 1) he h a s b e e n p r e s e n t in th e U n ite dS ta te s fo ra t l e a s ts e v e n y e a r s im m e d ia te ly precedi n g t h e date on w h i ch h e fil ed h i s ap pl i cat i on , ( 2) he h as been a person of g o o dm o r a l ch a r a c te rd u r in gth a t p e r io d , a n d(3 ) h is re m o v a lw o u ldre s u lt in e x tr e m e h a r d s h ip to e ith e rh im s e lf o raq u a lify in gre la tiv e . I d. T h e app l i cat i on f

or c an cel l ati on of

rem oval u n der t h e speci alrul es app l i ed t o c e r t ai n Guat e m al ans und e rN AC AR A i s s ubj e c t t o t he j ur i s di c t i o n- s t r i ppi ng p r o v is io n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 (a )(2 )(B ). S eeN A C A R A§ 203(b) , 111 St at . 2160, 2 1 9 8 -9 9 . A c c o r d in g ly , w e la c kju r is d ic t io n to r e v ie w th e c h a ll e n g e to th e B IA ’s d e n ia l o f th a t fo r m o f d is c r e tio n a r yre lie f. S ee S u ng v. K ei sler , 505 F. 3d 372, 377 ( 5th C i r. 200 7) . H ow ever, § 12 5 2 (a )( 2) ( B ) does not prevent t h i s c ou rtf rom c o n s id e r in gco n s tit u tio n a l cla im s o rq u e s tio n s o f la w . S ee§ 1 2 5 2 (a )(2 )(D ). W h ile a tt e m p tin gto co u c h h is a r g u m e n ts a s q u e s tio n s o f la w , Y a t’s a r g u m e n ts b o il dow n t o a di spu t e over th e I m m i gr a t i on Ju dg e’ s w ei gh i n g an d f i n di n g of

fact s. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h is c o u r tla c k s ju r is d ic t io n to r e v ie w th e B IA ’s d e n ia l o f Y a t ’s a p p lic a tio n fo rc a n c e lla tio n o f r e m o v a l u n d e rN A C A R A§ 2 0 3 (b ). S ee Sung , 505 F. 3d at377. Yat ’ s pe t i t i o n f

o rr e vi e w i s D I SM I SSED f o rl ac k o f

j ur i s di c t i o n.