alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,738,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  863,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,416
<INVENTORY>                                 13,997,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,357,256
<PP&E>                                       9,278,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,642,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,381,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,610
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,749,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,642,876
<SALES>                                     12,628,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,612,025
<CGS>                                        9,382,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,780,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,432,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (121,241)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (479,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (191,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (288,282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, 

INC., 

Plaintiff,

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, 

Defendant.

Action No. 3:08BCVB483 

ORDER 

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the unopposed motion by the Campaign 

Legal Center and Democracy 21 (Docket No. 140) for leave to file memorandum as 

amici curiae. The Court GRANTS the motion.

The Clerk is directed to file the amicus curiae memorandum of the Campaign 

Legal Center and Democracy 21 and send a copy of this Order to all Counsel of record. 

It is SO ORDERED. 

ENTERED this 15th day of November 2010 

 /s/ 

James R. Spencer 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS Document 149 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT23.1

 

CONSENT OF FARBER &HASS LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to theNetLojix Communications, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No.333-30725) and NetLojix Communications, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (FormS-8 No. 333-64769) of our report dated March 8, 2002, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of NetLojix Communications,Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December31, 2001.

                                                                           /s/FARBER & HASS LLP

Oxnard, CaliforniaMarch 25, 2002
Attendees for NAM:

Bryan L. Brendle, NAM

Steven J. Arita- Chevron

Roger Martell- Sidley Austin LLP

Attendees for EPA: 

Janet McCabe, OAR

Gautam Srinivasan, OGC 

Steve Page, OAR

Rosalina Rodriguez, OAR

SummaryOfficials from EPA met with representatives of the National Association of Manufacturers 

(NAM) on March 10, 2010 to discuss EPA’s ongoing reconsideration of the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

rulemaking. NAM had requested the meeting.

NAM representatives began by noting that NAM, along with other groups, would soon be 

sending a written request that EPA extend the comment period on the Agency’s proposed rule 

regarding the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The groups will likely ask for an additional 60 days to 

provide comments. The comment period is set to close on March 22, 2010.

NAM representatives then listed a few of the issues that the group will discuss in greater detail in 

its written comments. The issues were1) The timing and process of EPA’s reconsideration

2) Implementation of a potentially tighter standard

3) Implications as the ozone standard approaches background levels

On the last issue, EPA requested that NAM submit any information in its possession regarding 

background ozone levels. 

The discussion lasted 20 minutes.
§ 670.33 Content of permit applications. In addition to the information required in subpart C of this part, an applicant seeking a permit to import into or export from the United States a native mammal, a native bird, native plants or native invertebrates taken within Antarctica shall include the following in the application: ( a ) Information demonstrating that the import or export would further the purposes for which the species was taken;
( b ) Information demonstrating that the import or export is consistent with the purposes of the Act or the regulations in this part;
( c ) A statement as to which U.S. port will be used for the import or export, and
( d ) Information describing the intended ultimate disposition of the imported or exported item.
[63 FR 50164, Sept. 21, 1998, as amended at 86 FR 27988, May 25, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director


May 15, 2007
§ 108.697 Buoyant work vests. ( a ) Each buoyant work vest on a unit must be approved under Subpart 160.053 or Subpart 160.077 of this chapter.
( b ) Commercial hybrid PFD's carried as work vests must be— ( 1 ) Used, stowed, and maintained in accordance with the procedures set out in the manual required for these devices by § 160.077-29 of this chapter and any limitation(s) market on them; and
( 2 ) Of the same or similar design and have the same method of operation as each other hybrid PFD carried on board.
[CGD 78-174A, 51 FR 4351, Feb. 4, 1986]
RLED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

~1

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

FILE COPY

RE: Case No. 14-1039 DATE: 3/13/2015

COA #: 12-13-00038-CV TC#: 08-CV-30,215

STYLE:JOAQUIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

v. SHELBY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, ET AL.

Petitioner's motion for rehearing was this day

filed in the above styled and numbered case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354

TYLER, TX 75702
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Ronald E. Badke, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



By: /s/ Ronald E. Badke
    -------------------------------------
    Ronald E. Badke
    Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
    May 18, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARY JEROME WHITING,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-13756

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL R. 

STILLMAN, P.C., d/b/a STILLMAN

LAW OFFICE,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees, which has been

fully briefed. Pursuant to L.R. 7.1, the court did not hear oral argument.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices

Act. The parties settled this matter after Plaintiff accepted Defendant’s offer of

judgment in the amount of $3,250. The offer of judgment provided that Plaintiff

was entitled to attorneys’ fees, either to be determined by the parties or the court. 

Because the parties were unable to resolve the issue, Plaintiff filed this motion.

Plaintiff seeks attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,608.90 and costs in the

amount of $455. These fees were calculated by the “lodestar” method as follows:

3.2 hours by attorney Larry Smith at $348 per hour, 7.4 hours by attorney David

5:14-cv-13756-JCO-PJK Doc # 17 Filed 02/18/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 135
Marco at $317 per hour, and 1.3 hours by paralegal Nicole Dycha at $115 per hour. 

See generally Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). 

Plaintiff’s request for fees is supported by contemporaneous time records

and timekeeper affidavits. Based on the nature of the case, the experience of the

professionals involved, and local market rates, the court finds that Plaintiff’s

requested hourly rates are reasonable. See Pl.’s Exs. B, C, D. In light of the

procedural posture of the case and Plaintiff’s time records, the court also finds that

the time spent – approximately twelve hours – to be reasonable. The court

concludes that the total amount sought by Plaintiff – $3,608.90 – is reasonable and

that no adjustment to the lodestar amount is warranted. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for

attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,608.90 and costs in the amount of $455 is

GRANTED. 

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: February 18, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on this date, February 18, 2015, using the ECF system.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

-2-

5:14-cv-13756-JCO-PJK Doc # 17 Filed 02/18/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 136
#### George R. Bell, *Survivor, etc., Respondent, v.*The Lycoming Fire Insurance Company, *Appellant*.

Judgment and order affirmed on opinion of court below.
Exhibit 10.30


 


Debt Offset Agreement


 


[Unofficial English Translation] 


 


Party A: UTime Technology (HK) Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Minfei Bao


 


Party C: UTime Limited


 


Whereas,


 


		1.	As of March 31, 2019, the balance due to Party A from Party B is US$938,455.46.



 


		2.	As of March 31, 2019, the balance due to Party B from Party C is US$984,000.00.



 


By the consents
of the Parties, in connection with debt offset, Party A, Party B and Party C agree as follows:


 


		1.	The Parties agrees to offset the debt of US$938,455.46 owed by Party B to Party A with the debt
of US$938,455.46 owed by Party C to Party B.



 


		2.	As a result, the balance due to Party A from Party B is nil and the balance due to Party B from
Party C is US$45,544.54.



 


		3.	This Agreement shall be provided in triplicate, with each party holding one copy and becomes effective
upon the execution or seal by the three parties. In the event of disputes or litigation arising out of or in connection with this
Agreement, the Parties agree that such dispute shall be first negotiated by the three parties amicably; if such negotiation falls
apart, any one of the three parties should bring a lawsuit in the People’s Court where Party B is located.



 


	Party A:	 	Party B:	 	Party C:
	 	 	 	 	 
	UTime Technology (HK) Co., Ltd. (Seal Affixed)	 	/s/ Minfei Bao	 	UTime Limited (Seal Affixed)
	 	 	Minfei Bao	 	/s/ Minfei Bao
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	 	Date:	 	Date: March 31, 2019
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2015 

To instruct the Secretary of Energy to carry out a study on the use of 

thorium-fueled nuclear reactors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To instruct the Secretary of Energy to carry out a study 

on the use of thorium-fueled nuclear reactors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY. 

4 Not later than February 1, 2011, the Secretary of 

5 Energy shall transmit to the Congress a report showing 

6 the results of a study on the use of thorium-fueled nuclear 

7 reactors for national energy needs. Such report shall in8 clude a response to the International Atomic Energy 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2015 IH

1 Agency study entitled ‘‘Thorium fuel cycle—Potential ben2 efits and challenges’’ (IAEA–TECDOC–1450). 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Michael R. Kallet,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Eric E.
Stickels,  Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Oneida
Financial Corp. (the  "Company"),  each certify in his capacity as an officer of
the Company  that he has reviewed  the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form
10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2009  and  that to the best of  his/her
knowledge:

(6)   the report fully complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(7)   the information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


August 14, 2009                       /s/  Michael R. Kallet
---------------                       ----------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2009                       /s/ Eric E. Stickels
---------------                       ----------------------
Date                                       Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                  Exhibit 32.1
# CE2009066EN.01008201.xml

| 20.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 66/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 66/82

---

Request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin

P6_TA(2008)0089

P6_TA(2008)0089

European Parliament decision of 12 March 2008 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin (2007/2215(IMM))

(2009/C 66 E/16)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin, forwarded by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Austria on 24 September 2007, and announced in plenary sitting on 27 September 2007, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin, forwarded by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Austria on 24 September 2007, and announced in plenary sitting on 27 September 2007,

| — | having heard Hans-Peter Martin in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having heard Hans-Peter Martin in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

| — | having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

1

| — | having regard to Article 57 of the Austrian Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 57 of the Austrian Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz,

| — | having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0071/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0071/2008),

| 1. | Decides to waive the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to waive the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authority of the Republic of Austria. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authority of the Republic of Austria.

---

(1)  Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391.

1

Wagner

Fohrmann and Krier

Wybot

Faure and others

---
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-130048 and 333-152020) and related prospectus and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-160414, 333-148318, 333-136957, 333-110696, 333-100971 and 333-11650) of B.O.S Better Online Solutions Ltd. (“BOS”) of our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BOS, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererTel Aviv Israel

June 29, 2011
KOST, FORER GABBAY & KASIERER

A Member of Ernst &Young Global
#### § 114.900 OMB control numbers.

(a) *Purpose.* This section lists the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et. seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f), which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR Section where identified and described | Current OMB Control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 115.105(a) | 1625-0057 |
| 115.202 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.204 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.302 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.306 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.310 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.500(a) | 1625-0057 |
| 115.612 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.700 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.704 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.710 | 1625-0057 |
| 115.810(b) | 1625-0057 |
| 115.920(c) | 1625-0057 |
| 115.930 | 1625-0057 |
| 116.202 | 1625-0057 |
| 116.330 | 1625-0057 |
| 116.340 | 1625-0057 |
| 116.520 | 1625-0057 |
| 116.530 | 1625-0057 |
| 116.610(f) | 1625-0057 |
| 120.220(d) | 1625-0057 |
| 120.320(d) | 1625-0057 |
| and (e) | |
| 121.420 | 1625-0057 |
| 121.506 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.202 | 1625-0001 |
| 122.206 | 1625-0001 |
| 122.208 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.220 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.230 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.280 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.282 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.340(c) | 1625-0057 |
| 122.402 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.420 | will be displayed when assigned by OMB |
| 122.502 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.503 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.504 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.506 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.510 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.514 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.515 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.516 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.518 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.520 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.524 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.602 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.604 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.606 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.608 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.610 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.612 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.702 | 1625-0057 |
| 122.704(c) | 1625-0057 |
| 122.728(c) | 1625-0057 |

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 885, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58348, Sept. 30, 2004]
§ 11.512 Service requirements for national endorsement as first assistant engineer of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for endorsement as first assistant engineer of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels is— ( 1 ) One year of service as an assistant engineer while holding a license or MMC with a second assistant engineer endorsement; or
( 2 ) One year of service as a chief engineer (limited) and completing the appropriate examination described in subpart I of this part.
( b ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.327, 11.331, and 11.333 of this part.
#### George W. Millar and William D. May, *Respondents, v.*Enoch W. Page, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.