alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on [Part 150](/current/title-46/part-150?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2012-0832, [77 FR 59783](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/77-FR-59783), Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 150.105 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 ([44 U.S.C. 3501](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/44/3501) *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of [44 U.S.C. 3507(f)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/44/3507) which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| § 150.01-15 | 1625-0007 |
| § 153.5 | 1625-0007 |
| § 153.905 | 1625-0094 |
| § 153.910 | 1625-0094 |
| § 153.968 | 1625-0094 |
| Part 154 | 1625-0029 |
| § 154.12 | 1625-0007 |

[[49 FR 38121](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/49-FR-38121), Sept. 27, 1984, as amended by CGD 77-069, [52 FR 31626](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-31626), Aug. 21, 1987; USCG-2004-18884, [69 FR 58349](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-58349), Sept. 30, 2004]
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-76 Hydrochloric acid, spent (NTE 15%). ( a ) ( 1 ) Gravity type cargo tanks must be designed and tested to meet the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping for a head of water at least 8 feet above the tank top or the highest level the lading may rise, whichever is greater. The plate thickness of any part of the tank may not be less than three-eighths inch. A shell plating of a barge may not be on the boundary of any part of the cargo tank.
( 2 ) Gravity tank vents must: ( i ) Terminate above the weatherdeck, clear of all obstructions and away from any from any source of ignition; and
( ii ) Be fitted with a single flame screen or two fitted flame screens as described in § 151.03-25. Neither a shut-off valve nor a frangible disk may be fitted in the vent lines.
( b ) Openings in the tanks are prohibited below deck, except for access openings used for inspection and maintenance of tanks, or unless otherwise specifically approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG). Openings must be fitted with bolted cover plates and acid-resistant gaskets.
( c ) Where special arrangements are approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG) to permit a pump suction to be led from the bottom of the tank, the filling and discharge lines must be fitted with shutoff valves located above the weatherdeck or operable from it.
( d ) The outage may not be less than 1 percent.
( e ) An enclosed compartment containing, or a compartment adjacent to, a cargo tank: ( 1 ) May have no electrical equipment that does not meet or exceed class I-B electrical requirements; and
( 2 ) Must have at least one gooseneck vent of 2.5 inch diameter or greater. The structural arrangement of the compartment must provide for the free passage of air and gases to the vent or vents.
( f ) No lights may be used during the cargo transfer operations, except installed electric or portable battery lights. Smoking is prohibited and the person in charge of cargo transfer shall ensure that “No Smoking” signs are displayed during cargo transfer operations.
( g ) Tanks approved for the transportation of acid cargoes subject to this section may not be used for the transportation of any other commodity, except upon authorization by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( h ) Each cargo tank must be examined internally at least once in every 4 years. If the lining of the cargo tank has deteriorated in service or is not in place, the Marine Inspector may require the tank to be tested by such nondestructive means as he may consider necessary to determine its condition.
[CGD 80-001, 46 FR 63279, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4781, Feb. 3, 1983]
FILED: July 30, 2012

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 12-1124

(3:12-cv-00036-JAG)

___________________

CHARLES TISDALE

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

HONORABLE BARACK H. OBAMA, personally and in his official capacity as 

President of the United States; DON PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary 

of the Virginia State Board of Elections; THE VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF 

ELECTIONS; NEIL H. MACBRIDE, in his official capacity as United States 

Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; FEDERAL ELECTION 

COMMISSION

 Defendants - Appellees

----------------------------------

MARIO APUZZO

 Amicus For Appellant

___________________

M A N D A T E

___________________

Appeal: 12-1124 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/30/2012 Pg: 1 of 2
The judgment of this court, entered 6/5/2012, takes effect today.

This constitutes the formal mandate of this court issued pursuant to Rule 

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

/s/Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Appeal: 12-1124 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/30/2012 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 111.01-1 General. ( a ) Electric installations on vessels must ensure: ( 1 ) Maintenance of services necessary for safety under normal and emergency conditions.
( 2 ) Protection of passengers, crew, other persons, and the vessel from electrical hazards.
( 3 ) Maintenance of system integrity through compliance with the applicable system requirements (IEEE, NEC, IEC, etc.) to which plan review has been approved.
( b ) Combustible material should be avoided in the construction of electrical equipment.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28275, June 4, 1996; 62 FR 23907, May 1, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13503-13504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Loan Repayment.

[[Page 13504]]

    Date: April 25, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS, Building 4401, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: RoseAnne M. McGee, Associate Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat'l Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences, PO Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 
(919) 541-0752, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ef3fdf9fbfbafdef0f7fbf6edb0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="08656b6f6d6d394866616d607b26666160266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in Toxicological Research and Testing, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1407 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Paulson, Christine [DNR]

To: Bhesania, Amy

Cc: Algoe-Eakin, Amy; Jay, Michael; McGraw, Jim [DNR]; Walker, Wendy [DNR]; Johnson, Matthew [DNR]; Tapp, Joshua

Subject: IDNR PM2.6 Infrastructure SIP: Clarification of SMC withdrawal

Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:56:25 AM

Amy,

In response to your request, please accept the following clarification regarding the PM2.5 Significant Monitoring Concentrations

(SMC) included in Iowa’s Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.  Iowa DNR sent the SIP to Regional Administrator

Brooks on July 23, 2013.  In reference to the SMC, the cover letter for the submittal states:

· Item 3: Amendment to subrule 33.3(9) to adopt by reference 52.21(i), except that the October 20, 2010,

amendments to 40 CFR 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c) (adding the PM2.5 SMC) shall not be included in the revisions to Iowa’s SIP.

To clarify, it is Iowa DNR’s intention that PM2.5 remain on the list of pollutants, but that the associated concentration level would

be blank or zero. In other words, PM2.5 pre-construction monitoring would continue to apply but without de minimis thresholds.

If you need anything further or have any additional questions, please let us know.

Best regards,

Christine

Please note my new phone number below.

CHRISTINE PAULSON Environmental Specialist Senior

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

P 515.725.9510 | christine.paulson@dnr.iowa.gov

Air Quality Bureau | 7900 Hickman Rd., Ste 1 | Windsor Heights, IA 50324

www.IowaCleanAir.gov | Air Construction Permit Hotline 877.247.4692

WWW.IOWADNR.GOV

Leading Iowans in Caring for Our Natural Resources.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0167-0032

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:

Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair Requirements

The proposed modifications to 40 C.F.R. § 82 would further the purpose of minimizing 

the use of class I and class II substances as stated in § 608 of the Clean Air Act. As the design 

and new construction industry move towards more sustainable refrigerant technologies, the 

HVAC and industrial maintenance industries must keep pace. Any move towards the 

standardizing of maintenance procedures and the decommissioning of cooling systems that leak 

substantial levels of refrigerant is a step in the proper direction.

The benefits of these proposed changes are worthwhile. The benefits of minimizing the 

use of ozone depleting substances (“ODS”) are obvious. However, one of the major corollary

benefits as a result from the decommissioning of repeatedly-leaking systems is the replacement 

of those systems with more efficient systems, decreasing industrial and commercial energy usage 

for HVAC and industrial processes.

Specifically, there are three of the proposed changes that I strongly support. First, the 

retrofit time reduction is a much-needed change that will prevent the worst-leaking systems from 

continuously exceeding leak rate limits, while still providing a more economical option to the 

operator than requiring the decommissioning and replacement of a system. Moving from a oneyear time period to a six-month time period for replacement will substantially affect the ODPweighted tonnes being released into the atmosphere. Second, the movement towards a leak rate 

formula that accounts for periods of longer than a year between recharges is much more useful 

than a single-year calculation. As refrigeration and cooling technology improves, the useful life 

of systems increase. With those increases come reduced levels of ODS leakage. Having a 

formula that accounts for those reduced levels of leakage over periods extending more than one 

year will improve documentation of leak rates and subsequently, the regulation of systems 

leaking unacceptable levels of ODS. Finally, the worst-leaker provision is much more helpful in 

regulating ODS releases. This provision as revised would target the highest polluting systems 

for regulation. The second option the Environmental Protection Agency is considering would 

provide for more flexibility for the system operators, while also providing higher levels of 

regulation for systems that repeatedly leak ODS.

Reid Jennings

2803 E. 37th Ave

Spokane, WA 99223

P: 913.548.7630

rjennings@lawschool.gonzaga.edu
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 09/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                          PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
                 COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                         --------------------------------------------
                                          1992     1993     1994     1995      1996
                                         -------  -------  ------  ---------  -------
                                            (dollars in thousands, except ratios)
<S>                                      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>
Net income (loss) before taxes           $10,574  $20,831  $4,539   $(3,222)  $ 3,168
Interest expense                           1,771    2,362   3,869     5,409    14,275
                                         -------  -------  ------   -------   -------
     Earnings before fixed charges       $12,345  $23,193  $8,408   $ 2,187   $17,443
                                         =======  =======  ======   =======   =======
 
Preferred dividends                            -        -       -         -   $ 2,129
Ratio of pretax income to net income        1.54     1.54    1.54      1.54      0.89
                                         -------  -------  ------   -------   -------
Preferred dividend factor                      -        -       -         -   $ 1,895
 
Fixed charges:
Interest expense                           1,771    2,362   3,869     5,409    14,275
Preferred dividend factor                      -        -       -         -     1,895
                                         -------  -------  ------   -------   -------
     Total fixed charges and
        Preferred dividend               $ 1,771  $ 2,362  $3,869   $ 5,409   $16,170
                                         =======  =======  ======   =======   =======
 
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
      charges and preferred dividends       6.97     9.82    2.17      0.40      1.08
                                         =======  =======  ======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
§ 140.910 Towing vessel record or record specified by TSMS. ( a ) This section applies to a towing vessel other than a vessel operating only in a limited geographic area or a vessel required by § 140.905 to maintain an official logbook.
( b ) A towing vessel subject to this section must maintain a TVR or in accordance with the TSMS applicable to the towing vessel.
( c ) The TVR must include a chronological record of events as required by this subchapter. The TVR may be electronic or paper.
( d ) Except as required by §§ 140.900 and 140.905, records do not need to be filed with the Coast Guard, but must be kept available for review by the Coast Guard upon request. Records, unless required to be maintained for a longer period by statute or other federal regulation, must be retained for at least 1 year after the date of the latest entry.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                               
|----- |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |              |  | 
|DATE: |  | May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/    MICHAEL C.
FREDERICK                                                                                                   
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
History:

Hey Brian, 

### Re:GHGemissions

# Ill KathleenForney 

### to:BrianGlover Cc: LorindaShepherd,KyleHeitkamp,MichaelCarbon Thismessagehasbeenforwarded. 07/18/201211:08AM

You dont need to calculate your fee based off of co2e emissions. I actually don't the answer to the insignificant activities lsit. We will look into that and get back to you on that. Thanks, Katy Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA

- Region 4 61 Forsyth St., SW Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: 404-562-9130 Fax: 404-562-9059

-----Brian Glover <bglover@environcorp.com> wrote:

-----

To: Lorinda Shepherd/R4/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathleen Forney/R4/USEPA/US@EPA From: Brian Glover <bglover@environcorp.com> Date: 07/18/2012 08:45AM Cc: Kyle Heitkamp <kheitkamp@environcorp.com>, Michael Carbon <mcarbon@environcorp.com>

Subject: GHG emissions Ladies, Can you tellme if C02e shouldbe consideredwith regards to determining whether a source canbe deemed an insignificant emissions unit under Part 71? The rules have changes since we prepared the Shell application and I'm wondering if sources would not meet the insignificant criteria if C02e emissions are greater than 2 tpy. Similarly, should C02e emissions be considered in determining the application fee? Thanks for your help. Brian

[cid:image002.jpg@01CD64B9.2B5C0270]<http://www.environcorp.com/> Brian Glover 

### I SeniorManager ENVIRON International Corporation 8235 YMCA Plaza Drive 

### I Suite 300 Baton Rouge, LA 70810 T: +1 225 408 2741 

### I F: +1 225 408 2747 

### I M: +1 225 252 6562 bglover@environcorp.com<mailto:bglover@environcorp.com>This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protectedby law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information containedwithin. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply to email@environcorp.comand immediately delete all copies of the message.
§ 109.503 Emergency signals. ( a ) Emergency stations signals are established as follows: ( 1 ) The signal to man emergency stations is a rapid succession of short soundings of both the general alarm bell and the whistle, if a whistle is installed, for a period of not less than 10 seconds.
( 2 ) The signal to secure from emergency stations is the sounding of both the general alarm bell and the whistle, if a whistle is installed, three times.
( b ) The abandon unit stations signals are established as follows: ( 1 ) The signal to man abandon unit stations is a continuous sounding of both the general alarm and the whistle, if a whistle is installed.
( 2 ) If whistle signals are used to direct the handling of lifeboats and davit-launched liferafts, they must be— ( i ) One short blast to lower the lifeboats and davit-launched liferafts; and
( ii ) Two short blasts to stop lowering the lifeboats and davit-launched liferafts.
( 3 ) The signal to secure from abandon unit stations is the sounding of both the general alarm bell and the whistle, if a whistle is installed, three times.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56828, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25303, May 20, 1996]