# Electric Melt Furnace

NAIMA/U.S. EPA

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Fibertek Insulation, LLC

Lakeland Plant

2222 West Bellavista Street

Lakeland, Florida 33810

Project No. 10-3990.21

January 4, 2011

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the West Electric Melt Furnace

Baghouse located at the Fibertek Insulation, LLC (Fibertek) plant in Lakeland, Florida:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test pr ogram fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the

overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)

2 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

## ii Table I

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 2.2E-01 1.2E-01 1.5E+01

Organic

Condensable

PM 2.5 

## 8.1E-02 4.4E-02 5.7E+00

Inorganic

Condensable

PM 2.5 

## 3.0E-02 1.6E-02 2.1E+00 Baghouse October 12

& 13, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 3.3E-01 1.8E-01 2.3E+01

Filterable

Particulate 8.2E-01 4.4E-01 5.7E+01

Antimony < 2.9E-06 1.6E-06 2.0E-04

Arsenic 3.8E-06 2.1E-06 2.6E-04

Beryllium < 7.2E-07 3.9E-07 5.0E-05

Cadmium 3.7E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03

Chromium 2.8E-05 1.5E-05 1.9E-03

Cobalt 3.9E-06 2.1E-06 2.7E-04

Lead 2.9E-05 1.5E-05 2.0E-03

Manganese 2.1E-05 1.1E-05 1.4E-03

Nickel 2.6E-05 1.4E-05 1.8E-03 Baghouse October 12

& 13, 2010

Selenium 3.6E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03

Baghouse October 15,

2010 Mercury 2.5E-06 1.4E-06 1.9E-04

Baghouse October 13

& 14, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium 5.9E-06 3.2E-06 4.2E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01

Baghouse October 13,

2010 Hydrogen

Fluoride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

## iii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 1

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING 

## ....................................................................................................... 1

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2

3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................................... 3

3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 3

3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................................... 3

3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – Emissions Test Results Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results

Appendix B – Production Data

Appendix C – Field and Computer-G enerated Data Sheets and Notes

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the West Electric Melt Furnace

Baghouse located at the Fibertek Insulation, LLC (Fibertek) plant in Lakeland, Florida:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on

October 12, 13, 14, and 15, 2010. The test program c onsisted of emission tests at one exhaust

stack for each parameter. The field sampling por tion of the emissions test program included the

personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Sam Morris Metco Environmental

Daniel Moore Metco Environmental

Will Starkey Metco Environmental

Jason LaCroix Metco Environmental

Tom Osborn Fibertek Insulation

2.0 Process Description

Glass and cullet are fed to two electric steel shell furnaces and melted to be formed into

fiberglass. The emissions test program evaluate d emissions from the West Electric Steel Sheel

Furnace.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, the electric melt furnace was operated at slightly above

normal operating conditions. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control

and/or additional production information will be available to the U.S. EPA on request.

3 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)

4 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 2 

## 3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emi ssions test program can be separated into six

categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, mo lecular weight, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates;

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates;

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates;

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chro mium concentrations and emission rates;

and,

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by cate gory are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.6, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecula r weight, and moisture content was conducted

using the following reference test methods codifi ed at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

Method 1: “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

Method 2: “Determination of Stack Gas Velo city and Volumetric Flowrate”

Method 3A: “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions

from Stationary Sources”(Instru mental Analyzer Procedure)

Method 4: “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exha ust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate,

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sa mpling methodologies.

Stack gas velocity traverses we re conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing. The S-type pito t tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned.

Molecular weight was determined ac cording to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the

exhaust gas was measured us ing a M&C Products PMA 100-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments

(CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An in tegrated sample of the gas stream was

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe w ith an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizi ng a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 3 

## each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A sc hematic drawing of the emission

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated usin g Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers ) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic st ack sampling system. This

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM 2.5 

## particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fi ber filter assembly and h eated probe, (4) a glass

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6 ) a length of sample

line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pum p, dry gas meter, and calibrated

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and th ird impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC

water, the first and fourth impingers we re empty, and the fifth impinger contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccan t. A schematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emissi on rates were measured us ing the procedures of

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected meta ls concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic st ack sampling system. This

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or qu artz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a

heated quartz fiber filter assemb ly, (4) a set of six GS impingers , (5) a length of sample line,

and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice.

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid

(HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the thir d impinger was empty, and the fourth

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desi ccant. A schematic drawing of the metals

sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1 ) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a le ngth of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrate d orifice. The first impinger was left empty

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impi ngers contained approximately 300 g of silica

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 4 

## 3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heat ed steel probe with a

glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirc ulating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was fill ed with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desi ccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061

sampling train is provided as Figure 6.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentratio ns and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide co ncentrations and emission rates were conducted using the

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appe ndix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or qu artz probe liner; (2) a heated bor osilicate or quartz glass filter

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter

support; (3) a set of three Gr eensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech control case equipped with a

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Fi gure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A

sample train.

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 5 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions te st program are summarized by Table 2.

Table 2

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 2.2E-01 1.2E-01 1.5E+01

Organic

Condensable

PM 2.5 

## 8.1E-02 4.4E-02 5.7E+00

Inorganic

Condensable

PM 2.5 

## 3.0E-02 1.6E-02 2.1E+00 Baghouse October 12

& 13, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 3.3E-01 1.8E-01 2.3E+01

Filterable

Particulate 8.2E-01 4.4E-01 5.7E+01

Antimony < 2.9E-06 1.6E-06 2.0E-04

Arsenic 3.8E-06 2.1E-06 2.6E-04

Beryllium < 7.2E-07 3.9E-07 5.0E-05

Cadmium 3.7E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03

Chromium 2.8E-05 1.5E-05 1.9E-03

Cobalt 3.9E-06 2.1E-06 2.7E-04

Lead 2.9E-05 1.5E-05 2.0E-03

Manganese 2.1E-05 1.1E-05 1.4E-03

Nickel 2.6E-05 1.4E-05 1.8E-03 Baghouse October 12

& 13, 2010

Selenium 3.6E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03

Baghouse October 15,

2010 Mercury 2.5E-06 1.4E-06 1.9E-04

Baghouse October 13

& 14, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium 5.9E-06 3.2E-06 4.2E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01

Baghouse October 13,

2010 Hydrogen

Fluoride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

## Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 6 

## Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process

production data is included in Appendix B. Fi eld and computer-generated data sheets are

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes

laboratory analytical reports.

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Isolatek International. BTEC will not distribu te or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent

except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent

performance of its duties in executing the assign ment and preparing reports in accordance with

the normal standards of the profession, but di sclaims any responsibil ity for consequential

damages.

This report was prepared by:

David Center

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### diameter = 18"

Points Distance "

12 0.4

11 1.2

10 2.1

9 3.2

8 4.5

7 6.4

6 11.6

5 13.5

4 14.8

3 15.9

2 16.8

1 17.6



## Figure 1

Site:

Fibertek Insulation

Lakeland, Florida

Electric Melt Furnace Baghouse BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale > 9"

> 36"

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Fibertek Insulation, LLC

Lakeland, Florida

Electric Melt Furnace BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 3Site:USEPA OTM27/28Fibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,Michigan**Pump Silica gel** **Heated Filter Box S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple** **Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle Meter Rig** **Temp. Probe** **Filter On** **Off -** **+ 00:00** **1 2 3 4 5 45mm Filter Housing** **Filter Holder W/ Teflon Filter Verticle Condenser** **Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H** **2 O** 

## Figure 4

Site:

USEPA Method 5/29

Fibertek Insulation, LLC

Lakeland, Florida

Electric Melt Furnace BT Environmental Consulting, Inc

. 2615 Wolcott

Ferndale, Michigan Pump Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple Heated probe with glass liner & nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

Probe

Filter

On Off



### - + 00:00

1 2 3 4 5 100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution Empty Silica GelFigure 5Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainFibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 6Site:USEPA Method 0061Fibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott St.Ferndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 7Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainFibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica Gel

# APPENDIX A

Detailed Test Run Results

### Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 4 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/13/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:20:00 14:55:00 12:50:00

Run Finish Time 13:30:54 18:54:05 16:54:45

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240.70 239.56 240.47 240



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.803 0.803 0.803 0.80



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.00 30.01 30.01



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 85.423 87.530 84.573 85.842



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 80.75 90.75 87.21 86.24



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 83.899 84.379 82.084 83.454



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 67.4 49.6 48.2 55.1



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.17 2.33 2.27 2.59



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.6 2.7 2.7 3.0



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.964 0.973 0.973 0.970



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.39 1.46 1.45 1.43



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.51 20.48 20.50 20.50



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.1 78.06 78.05 78.1



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.04 29.05 29.05 29.05



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.64 28.76 28.75 28.72



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.8 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.94 29.95 29.95



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 148 148 148 148



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.460 0.458 0.460 0.459



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.0 38.9 39.0 39.0



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,764 3,784 3,792 3,780



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,490 4,475 4,483 4,483



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.1 103.8 100.3 102.4



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Filterable PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 34.80 35.10 38.30 36.07



### C mg/dscm Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E+01 1.5E+01 1.6E+01 1.5E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.1E-01 2.1E-01 2.3E-01 2.2E-01



### E lb/ton product Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 6.0 31.0 4.0 13.7



### C mg/dscm Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E+00 1.3E+01 1.7E+00 5.7E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.6E-02 1.8E-01 2.4E-02 8.1E-02



### E lb/ton product Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0



### C mg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E+00 2.1E+00 1.7E+00 2.1E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.6E-02 3.0E-02 2.4E-02 3.0E-02



### E lb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Total PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 46.8 71.1 46.3 54.7



### C mg/dscm Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.0E+01 3.0E+01 2.0E+01 2.3E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-01 4.2E-01 2.8E-01 3.3E-01



### E lb/ton product Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### 10-3990.21 FIBERTEK

Lakeland Ca Baghouse Source

Morris PersonnelPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/13/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:20:00 14:45:00 8:10:00

Run Finish Time 13:30:00 18:55:00 12:15:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 240

D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235

C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.808 0.808 0.808 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.00 30.01 30.01

Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.96 0.89 1.26 1.03

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 151.646 149.610 150.755 150.670

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 99.42 106.43 97.98 101.27

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 142.889 139.157 142.522 141.522

V l c Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 93.4 86.7 92.7 90.9

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.40 4.08 4.36 4.28

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.9

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.970 0.972 0.970 0.971

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.39 1.46 1.47 1.44

%O 2 Oxygen, % 20.51 20.48 20.61 20.53

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.1 78.06 77.92 78.0

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.04 29.05 29.06 29.05

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.71 28.74 28.73 28.73

P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.8 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.94 29.95 29.95

t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 149 149 148 149

Δ P

av g Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.471 0.486 0.456 0.471

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.8 40.5 39.1 39.8

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,860 3,923 3,792 3,858

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,584 4,657 4,495 4,579

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.3 94.1 99.3 97.2

W

p Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 216.4 198.3 267.2 227.3

C

m g /dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 53.5 50.3 66.2 56.7

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.77 0.74 0.94 0.82

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

C

m g /dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.9E-06 3.0E-06 2.8E-06 2.9E-06

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 1.27 0.82 1.09 1.06

C

m g /dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 3.1E-04 2.1E-04 2.7E-04 2.6E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-06 3.1E-06 3.8E-06 3.8E-06

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

C

m g /dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.9E-05 5.1E-05 5.0E-05 5.0E-05

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.1E-07 7.5E-07 7.0E-07 7.2E-07

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 25.39 3.71 1.73 10.28

C

m g /dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 6.3E-03 9.4E-04 4.3E-04 2.5E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 9.1E-05 1.4E-05 6.1E-06 3.7E-05

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 12.18 6.45 4.46 7.70

C

m g /dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.0E-03 1.6E-03 1.1E-03 1.9E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.4E-05 2.4E-05 1.6E-05 2.8E-05

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 1.46 1.13 0.63 1.07

C

m g /dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-04 2.9E-04 1.6E-04 2.7E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.2E-06 4.2E-06 2.2E-06 3.9E-06

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 12.9 6.36 4.51 7.92

C

m g /dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 3.2E-03 1.6E-03 1.1E-03 2.0E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.6E-05 2.4E-05 1.6E-05 2.9E-05

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 7.6 4.9 4.9 5.8

C

m g /dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03 1.4E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.7E-05 1.8E-05 1.7E-05 2.1E-05

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 8.84 8.34 4.34 7.17

C

m g /dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-03 2.1E-03 1.1E-03 1.8E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.2E-05 3.1E-05 1.5E-05 2.6E-05

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 9.7 9.4 11 10.0

C

m g /dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E-03 2.4E-03 2.7E-03 2.5E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.5E-05 3.5E-05 3.9E-05 3.6E-05

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-286C FIBERTEK

LAKELAND, FL BAGHOUSE Source

MOORE PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany Name Plant Location CityPlant Location State Source Name Source IDFibertek Insulation, LLC Lakeland Florida Electric Melt Furnaces West Baghouse StackPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)1 10/15/2010 8:00 10/15/2010 10:00 1.82E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2.41E-062 10/15/2010 10:20 10/15/2010 12:15 2.01E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2.67E-063 10/15/2010 12:40 10/15/2010 14:40 1.85E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2.46E-06Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DatePage 1 of 31/4/2011M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimit#DIV/0! 3.4 1.47 20.54 4,495 3,542 149.68Flow data is the average from allisokinetic test runsR1, B 22 0 22 0 22 0.12 1% 0#DIV/0! 3.4 1.41 20.39 4,495 3,542 149.8Flow data is the average from allisokinetic test runsR2, B 24 0 24 0 24 0.12 1% 0#DIV/0! 3.4 1.32 19.61 4,495 3,542 150Flow data is the average from allisokinetic test runsR3, B 22 0.7 22.7 0 22.7 0.12 1% 3Trap #1≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass forHg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section1 for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscmFlue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Page 2 of 31/4/2011M30B Mercury TestingConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit0.18R1, A 43.0 0.20 43.20 20 23.2 0.12 1% 00.190.0 3 0.1787 1070.20R2, A 40.0 0.00 40.00 20 20 0.12 1% 00.170.0 9 0.1361 810.19R3, A 41.0 0.90 41.90 20 21.9 0.12 1% 20.180.0 2 0.1547 95AverageRecovery,between 85 and115%Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass for Hgconc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm≥10 % RD massfor Hg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% RD or≤0.2μg/dscm abs.diff.for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm94Page 3 of 31/4/2011

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/13/2010 10/14/2010 10/14/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:50:00 8:25:00 12:55:00

Run Finish Time 16:55:00 12:30:00 17:00:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 240



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.231 0.231 0.231 0.231



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.806 0.806 0.806 0.81



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.00 29.99 30.00



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.94 0.95 0.94 0.94



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 147.232 146.648 147.370 147.083



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 99.54 91.32 97.28 96.05



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 138.693 140.158 139.293 139.382



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 161.6 179.1 110.1 150.3



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.61 8.43 5.18 7.07



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 5.2 5.7 3.6 4.8



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.948 0.943 0.964 0.952



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.45 1.56 1.35 1.45



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.50 20.59 20.54 20.54



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.05 77.85 78.11 78.0



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.05 29.07 29.04 29.05



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.48 28.44 28.64 28.52



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H

2 O -0.8 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.94 29.93 29.94



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 147 147 147 147



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.455 0.457 0.456 0.456



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.1 39.2 39.0 39.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,710 3,698 3,765 3,724



### Q

a w Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,494 4,505 4,488 4,496



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 102.8 104.8 102.1 103.2



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 3.8 0.8 0.4 1.7



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 9.7E-04 2.0E-04 1.0E-04 4.2E-04



### C mg/dscm@7%O 2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/h r Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-05 2.8E-06 1.4E-06 5.9E-06



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-286C FIBERTEK

LAKELAND, FL BAGHOUSE Source

MORRIS Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/13/2010 10/13/2010 10/13/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:19:00 17:21:00 19:00:00

Run Finish Time 10:45:00 18:25:00 20:05:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.808 0.808 0.808 0.81



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.01 30.01 30.01



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.48 1.49 1.49 1.49



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 42.779 42.085 43.408 42.757



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 80.25 90.25 87.92 86.14



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 42.171 40.734 42.193 41.699



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 31 24.7 25.4 27.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.46 1.16 1.20 1.27



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.3 2.8 2.8 3.0



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.967 0.972 0.972 0.970



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.47 1.49 1.43 1.46



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.61 20.44 20.47 20.51



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 77.92 78.07 78.1 78.0



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.06 29.06 29.05 29.05



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.69 28.75 28.74 28.73



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.80 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.95 29.95 29.95



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 148 148 148 148



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.453 0.453 0.454 0.453



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.9 38.9 39.0 39.0



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,764 3,787 3,793 3,781



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,480 4,479 4,489 4,483



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.0 96.2 99.9 99.0



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.4E-03 2.5E-03 2.4E-03 2.4E-03



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.4E-03 2.5E-03 2.4E-03 2.4E-03



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-286-C FIBERTEK

LAKELAND, FL BAGHOUSE Source

STARKEY Personnel

# APPENDIX B

Production Data

# APPENDIX C

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and

NotesBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.21Probe # PollutantPM2.5Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #53-1MethodOTM27/28Total Points12LocationLakeland CaRate (cfm)0.349Run #1Time/pt (min)20.06SourceBaghouseDelta ∆H@ Date10/12/10Time/reading20.06OperatorMorrisBws (%)3.64# of Ports2Total Run min240.70Filter Number Condensate Volume50.7Cp0.803Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain16.7DGM Y1.002Pm (in Hg)30.01Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.178O2 (%)20.51Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00017CO2 (%)1.39Md29.04Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.64Act. Flow (cfm)4,490Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 83.66Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)84.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,906Moisture % 3.65Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,764Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 16.8 9:20449.56 0.32 148 75 760.000.35 249 251 67 1516.8 36.0 9:36455.97 0.42 147 77 750.000.35 250 252 60 1436.0 56.2 9:56463.18 0.46 148 78 770.000.35 253 255 59 1356.2 77.8 10:16470.62 0.53 148 80 770.000.35 252 253 58 1277.8 98.8 10:37478.55 0.50 149 81 790.000.35 249 250 60 1198.8 119.8 10:58485.92 0.50 148 80 800.000.35 247 254 62 11119.8 136.9 11:30493.97 0.33 146 81 800.000.35 248 252 68 12136.9 155.9 11:47500.21 0.41 147 81 810.000.35 247 254 60 13155.9 175.1 12:06506.70 0.42 148 84 820.000.35 250 251 61 14175.1 195.7 12:25512.38 0.48 148 86 850.000.35 244 250 63 15195.7 217.7 12:45520.81 0.55 147 86 840.000.35 248 253 60 16217.7 240.7 13:07527.54 0.60 147 88 850.000.35 247 251 58 1240.7 13:30534.99Average:85.420.46 147.6 81.4 80.10.000.35 249 252 61.3333333 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.21Probe # PollutantPM2.5Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #53-1MethodOTM27/28Total Points12LocationLakeland CaRate (cfm)0.351Run #2Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBaghouseDelta ∆H@ Date10/12/10Time/reading20.0OperatorStarkeyBws (%)2.7# of Ports2Total Run239.6Filter Number Condensate Volume35.6Cp0.803Ps (in Hg)29.94Barometric30.00Silica Gel Weight Gain14DGM Y1.002Pm (in Hg)30.00Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.178O2 (%)20.48Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00017CO2 (%)1.46Md29.05Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.76Act. Flow (cfm)4,475Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 84.14Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)84.1Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,889Moisture % 2.70Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,784Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 16.2 14:55535.80 0.30 147 90 930.000.35 248 250 67 1.0516.2 35.9 15:11542.64 0.44 148 88 900.000.35 248 230 68 1.0435.9 55.1 15:30549.89 0.42 148 87 930.000.35 250 232 60 1.0355.1 76.6 15:50557.14 0.53 148 88 930.000.35 251 234 62 1.5276.6 97.5 16:11565.58 0.50 150 94 930.000.35 263 243 62 1.5197.5 120.5 16:32574.26 0.60 149 91 930.000.35 270 259 65 2.06120.5 137.5 16:55581.89 0.33 147 94 940.000.35 255 231 65 2.05137.5 157.1 17:12587.80 0.44 148 92 930.000.35 250 248 67 2.04157.1 176.8 17:31595.87 0.44 147 90 890.000.35 260 233 54 2.03176.8 198.1 17:51603.11 0.52 148 89 900.000.35 240 236 55 2.02198.1 218.6 18:12610.12 0.48 149 91 850.000.35 265 240 67 2.01218.6 239.6 18:33618.84 0.50 148 92 860.000.35 257 244 68 2.5239.6 18:54623.33Average:87.530.46 148.1 90.5 91.00.000.35 254.8 240.0 63.3 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.21Probe # PollutantPM2.5Points/PortStart Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #53-1MethodOTM27/28Total Points12LocationLakeland CaRate (cfm)0.342Run #4Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBaghouseDelta ∆H@ Date10/13/10Time/reading20.0OperatorStarkeyBws (%)2.7# of Ports2Total Run240.5Filter Number Condensate Volume30Cp0.803Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain18.2DGM Y1.002Pm (in Hg)30.01Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.178O2 (%)20.50Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00017CO2 (%)1.45Md29.05Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.75Act. Flow (cfm)4,483Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 81.85Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)82.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,897Moisture % 2.70Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,792Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 16.3 12:50679.66 0.30 147 83 850.000.35 223 271 60 4216.3 35.7 13:06685.69 0.43 148 84 860.000.35 248 253 66 3335.7 55.2 13:25693.14 0.43 149 88 850.000.35 269 252 68 3455.2 76.5 13:45700.20 0.52 149 84 850.000.35 253 260 59 3576.5 97.9 14:06707.68 0.52 148 87 860.000.35 263 255 54 3697.9 120.7 14:27714.98 0.59 147 88 870.000.35 264 254 58 31120.7 138.0 14:55722.70 0.34 147 90 870.000.35 268 261 59 32138.0 157.5 15:12729.16 0.43 148 87 870.000.35 252 264 65 33157.5 177.1 15:31735.65 0.44 148 90 880.000.35 258 263 67 34177.1 198.5 15:51743.10 0.52 149 91 870.000.35 256 268 66 35198.5 219.1 16:12750.98 0.48 148 91 880.000.35 271 252 68 46219.1 240.5 16:33758.83 0.52 148 91 880.000.35 256 255 60 4240.5 16:54764.23Average:84.570.46 148.0 87.8 86.60.000.35 256.8 259.0 62.5 3.1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286CProbe #30-3-2PollutantMetalsPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #50-2Method29Total Points129:20 13:3020.0/0.000 10.0/0.002LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.896Run #1Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@0.959Date12-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorMOOREBws (%)2.98# of Ports2Total Run240.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume67.1Cp0.808Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain26.3DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)30.13Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.235O2 (%)20.51Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00030CO2 (%)1.39Md29.04Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)1.60Ms28.71Act. Flow (cfm)4,584Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 142.28Preliminary dP (in H20)0.23Total Vol.(cf)215.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,979Moisture %3.00Preliminary Ts (oF)179Est. Us (ft/s)28.6Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,860Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3390Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 9:20675.176 0.50 148 84 800.701.1 250 267 56 415.0 10.0 9:25678.79 0.50 149 85 800.701.1 259 266 54 4110.0 15.0 9:30682.52 0.50 148 90 800.701.1 258 267 52 4115.0 20.0 9:35685.63 0.50 148 93 830.701.1 260 262 51 4220.0 25.0 9:40689.32 0.52 149 98 830.731.15 266 263 53 4225.0 30.0 9:45692.86 0.52 148 100 840.731.15 263 261 56 4230.0 35.0 9:50696.11 0.52 148 104 870.731.15 261 260 54 4235.0 40.0 9:55699.91 0.52 148 102 860.731.15 260 259 53 4340.0 45.0 10:00703.23 0.48 149 103 890.681 261 252 60 4345.0 50.0 10:05706.51 0.48 150 102 880.681 260 251 61 4350.0 55.0 10:10709.7 0.48 149 105 900.681 261 251 61 4355.0 60.0 10:15712.86 0.48 149 107 900.681 262 252 60 4460.0 65.0 10:20716.18 0.48 149 106 900.681 263 253 59 4465.0 70.0 10:25719.58 0.48 148 105 910.681 261 254 61 4470.0 75.0 10:30722.47 0.50 149 106 900.701 262 254 60 4475.0 80.0 10:35726.3 0.50 149 106 900.701.1 263 255 60 4580.0 85.0 10:40729.81 0.45 151 103 930.630.96 261 256 61 3.5585.0 90.0 10:45733.37 0.45 151 104 920.630.96 260 257 60 3.5590.0 95.0 10:50736.14 0.45 150 104 920.630.96 261 260 59 3.5595.0 100.0 10:55739.35 0.45 150 104 920.630.96 262 261 59 3.56100.0 105.0 11:00743.29 0.38 147 101 930.530.86 261 262 62 36105.0 110.0 11:05745.45 0.38 148 101 930.530.86 260 261 61 36110.0 115.0 11:10748.38 0.35 149 102 930.490.78 259 261 59 36115.0 120.0 11:15751.35 0.35 149 102 930.490.78 260 261 59 31120.0 125.0 11:30753.90 0.55 150 103 950.771.2 262 260 54 3.51125.0 130.0 11:35757.53 0.55 149 103 950.771 261 259 53 3.51130.0 135.0 11:40760.87 0.55 149 103 950.771 262 260 52 3.51135.0 140.0 11:45764.34 0.55 149 103 960.771 261 261 51 3.52140.0 145.0 11:50767.78 0.52 148 107 930.730.94 260 262 50 3.52145.0 150.0 11:55770.08 0.52 149 109 930.730.94 261 261 50 3.52150.0 155.0 12:00773.30 0.52 149 109 930.730.94 262 260 50 3.52155.0 160.0 12:05776.64 0.52 149 109 940.730.94 260 261 50 3.53160.0 165.0 12:10779.00 0.50 150 112 950.700.9 261 262 51 3.53165.0 170.0 12:15782.64 0.50 150 112 960.700.9 260 261 50 3.53170.0 175.0 12:20785.40 0.50 151 112 940.700.9 261 264 49 3.53175.0 180.0 12:25788.55 0.50 150 114 950.700.9 261 263 50 3.54180.0 185.0 12:30791.39 0.45 148 113 950.630.8 262 271 51 3.54185.0 190.0 12:35794.24 0.45 148 113 960.630.8 261 270 53 34190.0 195.0 12:40796.82 0.48 149 114 990.680.88 262 271 52 34195.0 200.0 12:45800.46 0.48 149 115 990.680.88 261 270 51 3.55200.0 205.0 12:50803.51 0.45 149 114 990.630.84 260 271 51 3.65205.0 210.0 12:55806.57 0.42 148 115 990.590.7 261 272 52 3.65210.0 215.0 13:00809.23 0.40 149 116 990.560.76 262 271 51 45215.0 220.0 13:05812.48 0.40 149 118 990.560.88 259 260 60 46220.0 225.0 13:10815.66 0.40 149 118 1000.560.88 261 262 62 46225.0 230.0 13:15818.73 0.40 149 118 1000.560.88 262 260 61 46230.0 235.0 13:20821.07 0.40 149 118 1000.560.88 261 261 60 46235.0 240.0 13:25824.41 0.40 149 118 1000.560.88 262 262 60 4240.0 13:30826.82Average:151.650.47 149.0 106.3 92.50.660.96 261 261 55.5208333 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286CProbe #30-3-2PollutantMetalsPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #50-2Method29Total Points1214:45 18:5520.0/0.000 10.0/0.000LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.58Run #2Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@0.888Date12-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorMOOREBws (%)2.8# of Ports2Total Run240.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume51.7Cp0.808Ps (in Hg)29.94Barometric30.00Silica Gel Weight Gain35DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)30.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.235O2 (%)20.48Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00030CO2 (%)1.46Md29.05Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)1.60Ms28.74Act. Flow (cfm)4,657Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 138.58Preliminary dP (in H20)0.23Total Vol.(cf)139.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)4,038Moisture %2.86Preliminary Ts (oF)179Est. Us (ft/s)28.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,923Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3388Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 14:45828.030 0.50 148 98 950.660.92 250 251 63 3.515.0 10.0 14:50831.28 0.50 149 95 930.660.92 251 254 57 3.5110.0 15.0 14:55834.59 0.50 148 97 950.660.92 250 255 57 3.5115.0 20.0 15:00837.83 0.52 148 97 950.690.96 251 256 56 3.5220.0 25.0 15:05841.57 0.54 150 106 950.711 252 257 55 3.5225.0 30.0 15:10844.4 0.54 150 108 960.711 251 258 54 3.6230.0 35.0 15:15847.51 0.54 149 108 960.711 252 260 54 3.6235.0 40.0 15:20850.8 0.54 149 109 960.711 251 260 54 3.6340.0 45.0 15:25854.03 0.52 150 111 960.690.96 250 261 52 3.5345.0 50.0 15:30857.19 0.52 151 111 960.690.96 251 262 52 3.5350.0 55.0 15:35860.38 0.50 150 111 970.660.92 250 262 51 3.5355.0 60.0 15:40863.54 0.50 150 112 970.660.92 249 261 52 3.5460.0 65.0 15:45867.07 0.48 149 117 990.630.86 251 260 51 3465.0 70.0 15:50869.94 0.48 149 117 990.630.86 250 260 50 3470.0 75.0 15:55872.63 0.48 148 117 990.630.86 251 261 52 3475.0 80.0 16:00875.5 0.48 149 117 990.630.86 251 262 53 3580.0 85.0 16:05878.36 0.42 148 116 1000.560.78 250 261 54 3585.0 90.0 16:10881.41 0.42 148 116 1020.560.78 251 260 56 3590.0 95.0 16:15884.48 0.42 147 116 1020.560.78 251 260 56 3595.0 100.0 16:20886.72 0.42 147 116 1020.560.78 251 260 56 36100.0 105.0 16:25889.61 0.38 149 117 1020.500.7 250 261 55 36105.0 110.0 16:30872.25 0.38 149 117 1020.500.7 251 260 54 36110.0 115.0 16:35895.18 0.38 150 117 1030.500.7 252 260 54 36115.0 120.0 16:40897.91 0.40 149 117 1020.530.72 252 260 53 31120.0 125.0 16:55900.518 0.50 150 115 1070.660.9 251 261 54 3.51125.0 130.0 17:00903.690 0.50 149 115 1070.660.9 252 260 56 3.51130.0 135.0 17:05906.550 0.50 150 115 1070.660.9 253 260 58 3.51135.0 140.0 17:10909.830 0.50 149 115 1070.660.9 252 261 56 3.52140.0 145.0 17:15913.820 0.50 148 112 1020.660.9 251 260 57 3.52145.0 150.0 17:20916.290 0.50 148 112 1020.660.9 250 261 58 3.52150.0 155.0 17:25920.070 0.50 148 112 1030.660.9 251 260 58 3.52155.0 160.0 17:30922.780 0.52 149 114 1020.690.96 252 261 59 3.53160.0 165.0 17:35926.510 0.52 150 114 1020.690.96 254 262 60 43165.0 170.0 17:40929.770 0.52 149 114 1020.690.96 255 261 60 43170.0 175.0 17:45932.810 0.52 149 114 1020.690.96 256 260 61 43175.0 180.0 17:50937.040 0.52 150 115 1020.690.96 257 261 60 44180.0 185.0 17:55939.520 0.52 149 115 1030.690.96 258 262 60 44185.0 190.0 18:00942.950 0.50 151 115 1030.660.9 258 261 59 44190.0 195.0 18:05945.730 0.50 152 115 1030.660.9 260 260 59 44195.0 200.0 18:10949.020 0.45 153 113 990.600.8 261 261 61 45200.0 205.0 18:15952.760 0.45 151 113 990.600.8 261 259 61 3.55205.0 210.0 18:20954.980 0.48 149 113 980.630.86 260 260 60 3.55210.0 215.0 18:25958.140 0.50 151 113 990.660.9 260 261 60 3.55215.0 220.0 18:30961.070 0.48 149 115 1000.630.86 261 252 62 46220.0 225.0 18:35963.580 0.48 149 115 1000.630.86 260 251 61 46225.0 230.0 18:40965.140 0.50 150 116 1010.660.94 261 253 60 46230.0 235.0 18:45967.240 0.50 151 116 1020.660.94 262 254 60 46235.0 240.0 18:50972.900 0.50 151 116 1020.660.94 261 254 60 4240.0 18:55977.640Average:149.610.49 149.4 112.6 100.30.640.89 253.7 259.1 56.7 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286CProbe #30-3-2PollutantMetalsPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #50-2Method29Total Points128:10 12:1516.0/0.000 7.5/0.000LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.594Run #3Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@1.26Date13-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorMOOREBws (%)3.0# of Ports2Total Run240.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume68.8Cp0.808Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain23.9DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)30.13Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.235O2 (%)20.61Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00030CO2 (%)1.47Md29.06Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)1.60Ms28.73Act. Flow (cfm)4,495Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 141.80Preliminary dP (in H20)0.23Total Vol.(cf)142.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,908Moisture %2.99Preliminary Ts (oF)179Est. Us (ft/s)28.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,792Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3390Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 8:10979.021 0.59 149 76 751.091.6 240 258 61 415.0 10.0 8:15983.44 0.60 149 76 751.111.6 245 255 55 4.5110.0 15.0 8:20986.37 0.60 149 78 751.111.6 248 255 49 4.5115.0 20.0 8:25990.46 0.59 149 80 751.091.6 250 254 50 4.5220.0 25.0 8:30994.81 0.53 148 85 770.981.4 251 254 51 4225.0 30.0 8:35997.91 0.55 148 90 801.021.5 252 260 55 4230.0 35.0 8:401000.07 0.55 148 94 801.021.5 255 259 53 4235.0 40.0 8:451004.5 0.56 147 99 841.031.55 253 254 50 4340.0 45.0 8:501007.95 0.48 149 102 850.891.3 257 259 51 4345.0 50.0 8:551011.23 0.48 148 103 860.891.3 255 258 50 4350.0 55.0 9:001014.31 0.48 148 105 880.891.3 256 258 50 4355.0 60.0 9:051018.75 0.48 146 105 880.891.3 255 260 52 4460.0 65.0 9:101022.33 0.41 147 106 890.761.15 256 259 51 4465.0 70.0 9:151025.33 0.42 148 108 900.781.2 250 258 50 4470.0 75.0 9:201028.63 0.42 148 108 910.781.2 251 253 50 4475.0 80.0 9:251032.17 0.43 148 110 920.791.2 253 250 52 4580.0 85.0 9:301035.82 0.40 148 110 940.741.1 255 251 51 4585.0 90.0 9:351038.56 0.40 149 111 940.741.1 256 250 51 4590.0 95.0 9:401042.22 0.40 148 111 940.741.1 252 250 51 4595.0 100.0 9:451045.36 0.40 148 112 950.741.1 253 251 53 46100.0 105.0 9:501048.71 0.33 147 112 950.610.92 255 253 51 46105.0 110.0 9:551051.6 0.32 148 112 950.590.9 254 253 52 46110.0 115.0 10:001053.88 0.32 148 110 950.590.9 252 259 54 36115.0 120.0 10:051055.6 0.32 148 111 950.590.9 251 257 54 31120.0 125.0 10:151057.343 0.50 149 99 950.921.4 258 259 59 3.51125.0 130.0 10:201059.700 0.49 148 100 950.911.4 249 258 55 3.51130.0 135.0 10:251063.180 0.50 147 103 950.921.4 250 260 50 3.51135.0 140.0 10:301066.580 0.50 147 107 950.921.4 250 260 49 3.52140.0 145.0 10:351069.770 0.50 148 109 950.921.4 252 261 48 3.52145.0 150.0 10:401073.070 0.51 148 110 960.941.4 251 260 50 42150.0 155.0 10:451076.630 0.51 148 109 960.941.4 253 259 52 42155.0 160.0 10:501080.250 0.50 148 109 960.921.4 253 257 52 43160.0 165.0 10:551083.470 0.52 146 110 960.961.45 254 258 51 43165.0 170.0 11:001086.790 0.52 146 110 960.961.45 252 255 50 43170.0 175.0 11:051090.020 0.52 147 110 950.961.45 252 254 53 43175.0 180.0 11:101092.940 0.52 148 109 960.961.45 254 254 53 44180.0 185.0 11:151096.570 0.45 148 110 950.831.25 253 249 54 44185.0 190.0 11:201099.820 0.44 147 110 950.811.2 250 248 54 44190.0 195.0 11:251103.440 0.44 148 111 950.811.2 253 248 53 44195.0 200.0 11:301106.900 0.45 150 110 950.831.25 251 247 55 45200.0 205.0 11:351109.670 0.41 149 110 960.761.1 251 250 53 45205.0 210.0 11:401113.090 0.41 149 109 970.761.1 253 255 54 45210.0 215.0 11:451116.880 0.42 148 109 970.781.2 253 256 55 45215.0 220.0 11:501119.840 0.42 148 110 970.781.2 261 248 56 46220.0 225.0 11:551121.960 0.33 148 110 970.610.92 258 251 60 46225.0 230.0 12:001123.720 0.33 147 109 970.610.92 259 250 59 46230.0 235.0 12:051125.910 0.33 147 111 970.610.92 258 251 58 46235.0 240.0 12:101127.580 0.33 147 110 97 0.92 257 251 57 4240.0 12:151129.776Average:150.760.46 147.9 104.5 91.40.851.26 252.9 254.7 52.8541667 3.9Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company FIBERTEK DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points2Location LAKELAND, FLRate (L/m)1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MOOREBws (%)# of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.94Barometric30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y0.991Pm (in Hg)30.00Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.5Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2)1.91134CO2 (%)1.5Md29.06Stack Area (sf)1.91Est.DH(in H2O) Ms29.06Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B8:00:00 AM 0.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 0.00 0 67 678:05:00 AM 5.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 5.208 5.349 67 678:10:00 AM 10.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 10.474 10.391 68 688:15:00 AM 15.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 15.602 15.328 69 688:20:00 AM 20.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 20.786 20.187 69 698:25:00 AM 25.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 25.924 25.887 69 698:30:00 AM 30.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 31.023 29.639 70 708:35:00 AM 35.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 36.182 34.439 70 708:40:00 AM 40.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 41.042 39.401 71 708:45:00 AM 45.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 46.347 44.389 71 718:50:00 AM 50.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 51.176 49.328 72 728:55:00 AM 55.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 56.254 54.312 72 729:00:00 AM 60.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 61.417 59.195 72 729:05:00 AM 65.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 66.125 64.229 72 739:10:00 AM 70.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 71.265 69.658 73 739:15:00 AM 75.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 76.196 74.730 74 749:20:00 AM 80.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 82.193 81.152 75 749:25:00 AM 85.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 86.160 85.431 74 749:30:00 AM 90.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 91.089 90.615 74 749:35:00 AM 95.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 95.658 95.819 74 749:40:00 AM 100.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 100.431 100.875 74 749:45:00 AM 105.0 151 250 250 1 1 2 4 105.855 106.709 74 749:50:00 AM 110.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 109.876 111.386 75 749:55:00 AM 115.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 115.417 116.526 74 7410:00:00 AM 120.0 149120.399 121.581 74 74Average 120.0 149.7 250.0 250.071.76 71.64Volume120.399 121.5810 0dscm0.12 0.120.00 0.00Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # HG PROBE Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company FIBERTEK DGM # HG2A/VOST 19 Method 30B Total Points2Location LAKELAND, FLRate (L/m)1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0OperatorBws (%)3 # of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpNAPs (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y0.991Pm (in Hg)30.01Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.4Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2)1.91134CO2 (%)1.4Md29.04Stack Area (sf)1.91Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.71Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B10:20:00 AM 0.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 0.00 0 73 7310:25:00 AM 5.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 4.952 5.378 74 7410:30:00 AM 10.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 10.239 11.138 74 7410:35:00 AM 15.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 15.641 16.368 75 7510:40:00 AM 20.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 20.223 20.046 76 7610:45:00 AM 25.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 25.557 26.381 77 7610:50:00 AM 30.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 30.733 31.631 77 7610:55:00 AM 35.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 35.820 36.648 78 7611:00:00 AM 40.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 40.798 41.706 78 7711:05:00 AM 45.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 46.078 46.799 77 7811:10:00 AM 50.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 51.491 52.582 77 7811:15:00 AM 55.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 56.415 57.315 78 7811:20:00 AM 60.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 61.427 62.373 78 7811:25:00 AM 65.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 66.798 68.143 77 7811:30:00 AM 70.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 71.795 72.563 78 7811:35:00 AM 75.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 77.023 78.025 78 7811:40:00 AM 80.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 82.212 83.259 79 7911:45:00 AM 85.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 87.823 88.840 79 7911:50:00 AM 90.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 92.433 93.417 78 7911:55:00 AM 95.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 97.584 98.537 79 7912:00:00 PM 100.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 102.016 103.935 79 7912:05:00 PM 105.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 107.789 108.910 80 7912:10:00 PM 110.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 112.468 114.043 80 7912:10:00 PM 115.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 117.362 118.861 80 7912:15:00 PM 120.0 150120.436 121.148 80 79Average 120.0 149.8 250.0 250.077.56 77.36Volume120.436 121.1480 0dscm0.12 0.120.00 0.00Trap/ Probe Temp15.0"@0.00Pre Test Post Test15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.0015.0"@0.00Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # HG PROBE Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company FIBERTEK DGM # HG2A/VOST 19 Method 30B Total Points2Location LAKELAND, FLRate (L/m)1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0OperatorBws (%)3 # of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpNAPs (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y0.991Pm (in Hg)30.01Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)19.6Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2)1.91134CO2 (%)1.3Md28.99Stack Area (sf)1.91Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.66Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B12:40:00 PM 0.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 0.00 0 78 7812:45:00 PM 5.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 4.938 5.647 78 7912:50:00 PM 10.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 10.009 10.927 80 8012:55:00 PM 15.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 15.583 16.621 80 801:00:00 PM 20.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 20.895 21.798 80 801:05:00 PM 25.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 26.058 26.902 79 801:10:00 PM 30.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 31.467 32.308 80 811:15:00 PM 35.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 36.631 37.258 80 811:20:00 PM 40.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 41.783 42.249 80 811:25:00 PM 45.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 47.197 47.601 80 811:30:00 PM 50.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 52.376 52.245 80 811:35:00 PM 55.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 58.078 58.178 80 811:40:00 PM 60.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 60.609 60.741 80 811:45:00 PM 65.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 68.364 68.276 82 821:50:00 PM 70.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 73.693 73.497 81 821:55:00 PM 75.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 78.996 78.531 81 822:00:00 PM 80.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 84.678 84.101 81 822:05:00 PM 85.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 89.517 88.947 81 822:10:00 PM 90.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 94.917 94.128 82 822:15:00 PM 95.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 100.502 99.537 82 822:20:00 PM 100.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 105.232 104.571 82 822:25:00 PM 105.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 110.448 109.627 82 822:30:00 PM 110.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 115.496 114.739 83 832:35:00 PM 115.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 119.927 119.182 83 832:40:00 PM 120.0 150125.829 125.233 83 83Average 120.0 150.0 250.0 250.080.72 81.24Volume125.829 125.2330 0dscm0.12 0.120.00 0.00Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286CProbe #51-3-2PollutantCR6+Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #50-2Method0061Total Points1212:50 16:5515.0/0.000 7.5/0.000LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.578Run #1Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@0.94Date13-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorMORRISBws (%)5.20# of Ports2Total Run240.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume153Cp0.806Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain8.6DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)30.13Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.231O2 (%)20.5Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00029CO2 (%)1.45Md29.05Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)1.60Ms28.48Act. Flow (cfm)4,494Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 138.10Preliminary dP (in H20)0.23Total Vol.(cf)138.7Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,914Moisture %5.22Preliminary Ts (oF)179Est. Us (ft/s)28.6Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,710Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3426Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 12:50133.373 0.49 147 91 930.611 75 61 515.0 10.0 12:55136.42 0.49 147 93 900.611 82 51 5110.0 15.0 13:00139.83 0.50 147 93 900.621 83 50 5115.0 20.0 13:05143.39 0.49 148 98 900.611 87 52 5220.0 25.0 13:10147.19 0.51 148 100 900.631.05 85 52 5225.0 30.0 13:15149.86 0.51 147 101 900.631.05 85 51 5230.0 35.0 13:20153.44 0.51 147 102 890.631.05 86 53 5235.0 40.0 13:25156.8 0.51 147 102 900.631.05 86 53 5340.0 45.0 13:30159.79 0.52 145 104 910.641.1 85 53 5345.0 50.0 13:35163.11 0.52 146 105 910.641.1 85 55 5350.0 55.0 13:40166.34 0.50 147 105 900.621 86 54 5355.0 60.0 13:45169.72 0.50 147 105 900.621 88 55 5460.0 65.0 13:50173.08 0.45 148 106 910.560.93 86 54 5465.0 70.0 13:55176.51 0.46 148 107 920.570.95 84 56 5470.0 75.0 14:00179.63 0.46 148 108 930.570.95 81 57 5475.0 80.0 14:05183.19 0.46 147 107 930.570.95 82 55 5580.0 85.0 14:10186.58 0.41 146 106 930.510.85 82 54 5585.0 90.0 14:15189.84 0.42 147 106 940.520.87 83 52 5590.0 95.0 14:20193.11 0.42 147 106 940.520.87 83 52 5595.0 100.0 14:25196.23 0.42 147 105 940.520.87 83 54 56100.0 105.0 14:30198.72 0.34 146 105 930.420.71 85 55 56105.0 110.0 14:35202.3 0.33 147 107 940.410.68 85 56 56110.0 115.0 14:40204.71 0.33 147 108 940.410.68 86 55 56115.0 120.0 14:45206.86 0.32 147 108 940.400.66 86 55 51120.0 125.0 14:55209.324 0.58 145 101 950.721.2 83 65 51125.0 130.0 15:00212.96 0.58 146 102 940.721.2 83 60 51130.0 135.0 15:05216.542 0.58 146 105 930.721.2 90 55 51135.0 140.0 15:10219.032 0.58 149 107 930.721.2 91 54 52140.0 145.0 15:15221.67 0.54 149 105 940.671.1 91 56 52145.0 150.0 15:20225.132 0.55 148 106 930.681.15 91 55 52150.0 155.0 15:25228.372 0.54 147 107 940.671.1 90 57 52155.0 160.0 15:30231.662 0.55 147 107 940.681.15 91 55 53160.0 165.0 15:35234.422 0.46 147 106 940.570.95 91 54 53165.0 170.0 15:40237.642 0.48 147 109 940.591 92 58 53170.0 175.0 15:45240.802 0.48 148 110 930.591 92 57 53175.0 180.0 15:50243.292 0.48 145 111 940.591 87 56 54180.0 185.0 15:55246.612 0.42 147 111 960.520.87 88 58 54185.0 190.0 16:00250.092 0.41 147 110 970.510.85 87 55 54190.0 195.0 16:05252.512 0.41 147 109 960.510.85 88 59 54195.0 200.0 16:10256.142 0.41 147 110 960.510.85 89 60 55200.0 205.0 16:15259.43 0.38 146 111 960.470.79 89 57 55205.0 210.0 16:20262.332 0.38 146 112 960.470.79 91 58 55210.0 215.0 16:25265.642 0.38 147 111 950.470.79 90 58 55215.0 220.0 16:30268.712 0.38 147 111 970.470.79 91 58 56220.0 225.0 16:35270.95 0.35 146 111 960.430.73 90 57 56225.0 230.0 16:40272.622 0.35 145 110 950.430.73 90 56 56230.0 235.0 16:45274.802 0.35 146 110 940.430.73 88 58 56235.0 240.0 16:50277.442 0.34 147 110 940.420.71 88 59 5240.0 16:55280.605Average:147.230.45 146.9 105.8 93.30.560.94 87 #DIV/0! 55.625 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286CProbe #51-3-2PollutantCR6+Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #50-2Method0061Total Points128:25 12:3016.0/0.000 8.0/0.000LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.584Run #2Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@0.945Date14-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorMORRISBws (%)5.7# of Ports2Total Run240.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume165.1Cp0.806Ps (in Hg)29.94Barometric30.00Silica Gel Weight Gain14DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)30.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.231O2 (%)20.59Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00029CO2 (%)1.56Md29.07Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)1.60Ms28.44Act. Flow (cfm)4,505Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 139.56Preliminary dP (in H20)0.23Total Vol.(cf)140.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,920Moisture %5.70Preliminary Ts (oF)179Est. Us (ft/s)28.6Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,698Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3434Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 8:25282.633 0.61 150 72 700.741.25 74 63 415.0 10.0 8:30285.38 0.59 149 72 710.721.2 75 57 4110.0 15.0 8:35289.1 0.60 149 78 710.731.25 79 57 4115.0 20.0 8:40292.25 0.60 149 81 710.731.25 83 56 4220.0 25.0 8:45295.83 0.55 147 86 730.671.15 85 55 4225.0 30.0 8:50299.07 0.55 147 86 740.671.15 86 54 4230.0 35.0 8:55302.49 0.55 147 90 750.671.15 86 54 4235.0 40.0 9:00305.33 0.55 147 92 750.671.15 86 54 4340.0 45.0 9:05308.4 0.48 148 93 770.581 85 52 4345.0 50.0 9:10311.71 0.48 147 93 770.581 85 52 4350.0 55.0 9:15314.29 0.47 147 95 790.570.97 84 51 4355.0 60.0 9:20317.01 0.48 147 98 790.581 85 52 4460.0 65.0 9:25320.31 0.41 146 100 800.500.85 83 51 4465.0 70.0 9:30322.92 0.42 147 100 810.510.87 83 50 4470.0 75.0 9:35326.24 0.42 147 102 820.510.87 82 52 4475.0 80.0 9:40329.59 0.42 146 101 840.510.87 84 53 4580.0 85.0 9:45331.87 0.39 147 102 850.470.81 83 54 4585.0 90.0 9:50334.37 0.39 147 102 850.470.81 83 56 4590.0 95.0 9:55337.9 0.40 146 101 860.490.83 84 56 4595.0 100.0 10:00341.31 0.40 147 101 860.490.83 84 56 46100.0 105.0 10:05344.77 0.31 147 100 870.380.64 84 55 46105.0 110.0 10:10347.22 0.31 147 101 870.380.64 84 54 46110.0 115.0 10:15350 0.32 145 87 1020.390.66 84 54 46115.0 120.0 10:20353.15 0.32 145 103 870.390.66 84 53 41120.0 125.0 10:30356.212 0.52 147 100 880.631.1 82 54 41125.0 130.0 10:35358.75 0.51 148 98 870.621.05 83 56 41130.0 135.0 10:40362.031 0.50 148 99 870.611 82 58 41135.0 140.0 10:45365.051 0.50 147 99 870.611 83 56 42140.0 145.0 10:50367.79 0.49 147 101 860.601 82 57 42145.0 150.0 10:55371.121 0.49 148 103 870.601 84 58 42150.0 155.0 11:00374.121 0.48 149 102 870.580.99 85 58 42155.0 160.0 11:05377.541 0.48 147 102 880.580.99 87 59 43160.0 165.0 11:10380.161 0.53 147 103 880.641.1 87 60 43165.0 170.0 11:15382.751 0.53 145 102 890.641.1 87 60 43170.0 175.0 11:20386.141 0.51 146 103 890.621.05 86 61 43175.0 180.0 11:25389.381 0.52 147 104 890.631.1 88 60 44180.0 185.0 11:30392.661 0.45 147 105 890.550.93 88 60 44185.0 190.0 11:35395.251 0.45 149 104 880.550.93 87 59 44190.0 195.0 11:40398.841 0.45 150 105 890.550.93 86 59 44195.0 200.0 11:45401.671 0.45 148 105 900.550.93 86 61 45200.0 205.0 11:50404.45 0.42 147 105 900.510.87 85 61 45205.0 210.0 11:55407.231 0.42 147 105 890.510.87 86 60 45210.0 215.0 12:00410.651 0.42 147 105 900.510.87 85 60 45215.0 220.0 12:05413.671 0.42 147 105 890.510.87 86 62 46220.0 225.0 12:10416.63 0.34 146 106 910.410.71 87 61 46225.0 230.0 12:15419.731 0.34 147 106 910.410.71 87 60 46230.0 235.0 12:20423.121 0.34 147 105 910.410.71 87 60 46235.0 240.0 12:25426.471 0.34 147 105 910.410.71 87 60 4240.0 12:30429.281Average:146.650.46 147.2 98.2 84.50.560.95 84.3 #DIV/0! 56.7 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286CProbe #51-3-2PollutantCR6+Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #50-2Method0061Total Points1212:55 17:0016.0/0.000 8.0/0.000LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.581Run #3Time/pt (min)20.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@0.938Date14-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorMORRISBws (%)3.6# of Ports2Total Run240.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume69.9Cp0.806Ps (in Hg)29.93Barometric29.99Silica Gel Weight Gain40.2DGM Y0.993Pm (in Hg)30.11Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.231O2 (%)20.54Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00029CO2 (%)1.35Md29.04Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)1.60Ms28.64Act. Flow (cfm)4,488Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 138.70Preliminary dP (in H20)0.23Total Vol.(cf)139.4Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,905Moisture %3.60Preliminary Ts (oF)179Est. Us (ft/s)28.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,765Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.3402Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 12:55430.875 0.52 144 92 910.661.1 81 70 415.0 10.0 13:00433.65 0.50 144 95 900.631 81 60 4110.0 15.0 13:05436.54 0.50 146 98 900.631 80 59 4115.0 20.0 13:10439.33 0.50 146 100 900.631 80 59 4220.0 25.0 13:15442.51 0.52 147 101 910.661.1 82 55 4225.0 30.0 13:20445.71 0.52 147 105 910.661.1 83 55 4230.0 35.0 13:25448.62 0.51 148 105 920.651.05 83 56 4235.0 40.0 13:30451.92 0.51 148 106 910.651.05 85 54 4340.0 45.0 13:35455.1 0.49 150 106 920.621 85 55 4345.0 50.0 13:40458.36 0.48 147 104 920.610.99 86 55 4350.0 55.0 13:45461.43 0.49 147 104 920.621 86 56 4355.0 60.0 13:50464.28 0.50 147 106 930.631 87 57 4460.0 65.0 13:55467.61 0.45 148 106 930.570.93 87 55 4465.0 70.0 14:00470.29 0.45 147 105 930.570.93 87 58 4470.0 75.0 14:05473.75 0.45 147 105 930.570.93 87 58 4475.0 80.0 14:10476.71 0.45 147 104 920.570.93 83 60 4580.0 85.0 14:15480.11 0.41 149 104 930.520.85 84 58 4585.0 90.0 14:20483.31 0.41 148 104 940.520.85 85 57 4590.0 95.0 14:25486.54 0.41 147 103 930.520.85 85 55 4595.0 100.0 14:30489.74 0.42 147 103 930.530.87 86 55 46100.0 105.0 14:35492.48 0.32 147 102 930.410.66 86 56 46105.0 110.0 14:40495.69 0.32 147 102 930.410.66 86 56 46110.0 115.0 14:45498.65 0.32 147 102 920.410.66 86 58 46115.0 120.0 14:50501.24 0.32 147 102 920.410.66 86 59 41120.0 125.0 15:00504.772 0.60 149 98 900.761.25 81 63 41125.0 130.0 15:05508.32 0.59 148 100 920.751.2 82 60 41130.0 135.0 15:10511.837 0.59 148 101 910.751.2 82 60 41135.0 140.0 15:15514.757 0.59 148 102 910.751.2 82 60 42140.0 145.0 15:20517.72 0.54 147 104 920.681.1 85 56 42145.0 150.0 15:25520.457 0.54 147 104 920.681.1 88 55 42150.0 155.0 15:30523.287 0.54 147 103 900.681.1 86 57 42155.0 160.0 15:35526.867 0.54 147 102 900.681.1 84 56 43160.0 165.0 15:40530.017 0.45 146 102 910.570.93 85 55 43165.0 170.0 15:45533.237 0.45 146 103 910.570.93 85 55 43170.0 175.0 15:50535.927 0.45 147 103 910.570.93 85 56 43175.0 180.0 15:55539.607 0.45 145 103 920.570.93 86 55 44180.0 185.0 16:00543.187 0.41 147 104 920.520.85 86 54 44185.0 190.0 16:05545.737 0.42 147 103 920.530.87 85 56 44190.0 195.0 16:10549.037 0.41 146 103 920.520.85 86 57 44195.0 200.0 16:15551.817 0.41 146 104 910.520.85 84 59 45200.0 205.0 16:20555.34 0.39 147 104 920.490.81 86 60 45205.0 210.0 16:25558.657 0.39 148 105 920.490.81 87 59 45210.0 215.0 16:30562.177 0.39 147 105 920.490.81 86 59 45215.0 220.0 16:35564.567 0.39 147 101 930.490.81 86 59 46220.0 225.0 16:40568.22 0.40 147 103 920.510.83 87 60 46225.0 230.0 16:45571.437 0.40 147 103 930.510.83 86 61 46230.0 235.0 16:50573.657 0.38 147 103 930.480.79 86 61 46235.0 240.0 16:55575.967 0.38 147 103 930.480.79 86 63 4240.0 17:00578.245Average:147.370.46 147.0 102.7 91.90.580.94 84.8 #DIV/0! 57.75 4.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286-CProbe #30-3-1PollutantHCl & HFPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #53-1MethodM26ATotal Points129:19 10:4517.0/0.005 7.0/0.003LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.703Run #1Time/pt (min)5.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@1.482Date13-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorSTARKEYBws (%)3.34# of Ports2Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume21.7Cp0.808Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain9.3DGM Y1.002Pm (in Hg)30.08Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.256O2 (%)20.61Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00036CO2 (%)1.47Md29.06Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)0.98Ms28.69Act. Flow (cfm)4,480Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 41.94Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)42.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,894Moisture % 3.36Preliminary Ts (oF)147Est. Us (ft/s)39.3Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,764Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.2822Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 9:19636.179 0.32 148 77 790.941.05 270 251 46 225.0 10.0 9:24639.44 0.42 149 79 781.241.4 270 256 47 2310.0 15.0 9:29643.12 0.45 149 80 781.321.45 271 266 45 2415.0 20.0 9:34646.31 0.52 148 79 781.531.7 273 268 44 3.5520.0 25.0 9:39650.16 0.48 147 83 791.411.6 270 262 48 3.5625.0 30.0 9:44654.30 0.52 148 82 781.531.7 259 260 49 3.5130.0 35.0 10:15657.712 0.30 149 83 810.880.98 263 255 62 2235.0 40.0 10:20661.20 0.43 148 79 791.271.4 272 263 60 2340.0 45.0 10:25665.71 0.43 148 79 801.271.4 270 268 60 3445.0 50.0 10:30668.63 0.54 148 84 801.591.75 263 269 54 4550.0 55.0 10:35672.02 0.49 148 86 791.441.6 268 271 54 4655.0 60.0 10:40675.92 0.53 146 85 811.561.75 269 270 55 460.0 10:45678.958Average:42.780.45 148.0 81.3 79.21.331.48 268 263 52 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286-CProbe #30-3-1PollutantHCl & HFPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #53-1MethodM26ATotal Points1217:21 18:2518.0/0.003 10.0/0.004LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.679Run #2Time/pt (min)5.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@1.49Date13-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorSTARKEYBws (%)2.8# of Ports2Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume16.3Cp0.808Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain8.4DGM Y1.002Pm (in Hg)30.08Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.256O2 (%)20.44Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00036CO2 (%)1.49Md29.06Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)0.98Ms28.75Act. Flow (cfm)4,479Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 40.51Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)40.7Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,895Moisture % 2.79Preliminary Ts (oF)147Est. Us (ft/s)39.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,787Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.2815Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 17:21766.260 0.52 148 89 901.581.7 258 232 44 2.525.0 10.0 17:26769.27 0.46 149 91 901.401.5 265 233 49 2.5310.0 15.0 17:31773.52 0.50 149 86 901.521.65 261 228 67 2.5415.0 20.0 17:36777.54 0.50 148 85 891.521.65 254 251 67 3520.0 25.0 17:41781.01 0.42 148 94 891.281.4 257 245 66 3625.0 30.0 17:46784.40 0.32 147 92 890.971.05 257 246 66 2.5130.0 35.0 17:55787.726 0.58 148 93 901.761.9 259 250 66 3235.0 40.0 18:00791.90 0.47 148 91 891.431.55 259 254 64 3340.0 45.0 18:05795.66 0.44 147 93 901.341.44 259 253 66 3445.0 50.0 18:10798.67 0.44 148 91 891.341.44 266 260 65 3550.0 55.0 18:15803.60 0.42 147 92 901.281.4 267 262 65 3655.0 60.0 18:20805.72 0.36 147 93 911.101.2 268 263 65 360.0 18:25808.345Average:42.090.45 147.8 90.8 89.71.381.49 260.8 248.1 62.5 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286-CProbe #30-3-1PollutantHCl & HFPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyFIBERTEKDGM #53-1MethodM26ATotal Points1219:00 20:0515.5/0.000 10.0/0.000LocationLAKELAND, FLRate (cfm)0.703Run #3Time/pt (min)5.0SourceBAGHOUSEDelta ∆H@1.486Date13-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorSTARKEYBws (%)2.8# of Ports2Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume18Cp0.808Ps (in Hg)29.95Barometric30.01Silica Gel Weight Gain7.4DGM Y1.002Pm (in Hg)30.08Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.8Actual Dn (in)0.256O2 (%)20.47Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)1.56An (ft^2)0.00036CO2 (%)1.43Md29.05Stack Area (sf)1.92Est.DH(in H2O)0.98Ms28.74Act. Flow (cfm)4,489Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 41.96Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)42.2Wet Ref Flow (cfm)3,901Moisture % 2.77Preliminary Ts (oF)147Est. Us (ft/s)39.3Dry Ref Flow (cfm)3,793Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)0.2815Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 19:00810.812 0.57 148 89 901.721.85 256 260 60 325.0 10.0 19:05815.57 0.50 148 88 871.511.65 245 257 56 3310.0 15.0 19:10818.61 0.50 149 89 881.511.65 248 260 55 3415.0 20.0 19:15821.19 0.44 149 88 871.331.45 240 264 56 3520.0 25.0 19:20825.21 0.42 148 88 871.271.4 241 257 56 2.5625.0 30.0 19:25827.69 0.30 148 88 860.910.98 242 258 56 2130.0 35.0 19:35831.144 0.52 148 86 871.571.7 255 254 65 3235.0 40.0 19:40835.21 0.49 149 87 861.481.6 256 251 60 3340.0 45.0 19:45838.75 0.45 149 88 871.361.45 257 252 54 3445.0 50.0 19:50842.10 0.43 148 89 871.301.4 256 253 54 3550.0 55.0 19:55846.00 0.40 148 90 881.211.3 257 254 55 3655.0 60.0 20:00850.79 0.43 148 91 891.301.4 257 255 55 360.0 20:05854.220Average:43.410.45 148.3 88.4 87.41.371.49 250.8 256.3 56.8333333 2.9Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

Equipment Calibration

Documents

# APPENDIX E

Laboratory Analytical

ReportsAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetone(mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)FilterablePM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)OrganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)InorganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)Run 1357.427.46.28.034.8066Run 2604.530.6316.535.10315Run 4648.330.04.25.938.3044Blank:47NDNDND1.9RDL:0.50.301.00.50CorrectedOTM 27/28 PM2.5Lab Results Blank CorrectionFibertek InsulationLakeland FloridaBTEC job # 10-3990.21Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010OTM28OTM27AcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight (mg)Run 1157 59.4 157.00 59.4216.4Run 2128 70.3 128.00 70.3198.3Run 317295.2172.0095.2267.2Blank200 ND NDRDL1 0.5 0.30Method 5 PM Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.21Lakeland FloridaFibertek InsulationCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)FilterRDL(μg)R1Result(μg)R2Result(μg)R3Result(μg)Test RunDetectLimit(RDL)(μg)R1(μg)R2(μg)R3(μg)MDLusedAntimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.800.80 0.80 0.80<Arsenic 1.09 0.40 2.4 1.9 2.2 0.801.27 0.82 1.09Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.200.20 0.20 0.20<Cadmium 0.11 0.10 25.50 3.82 1.84 0.2025.39 3.71 1.73Chromium 1.92 0.30 14.10 8.4 6.4 0.6012.18 6.45 4.46Cobalt ND 0.10 1.46 1.13 0.63 0.201.46 1.13 0.63Lead 1.10 0.20 14.0 7.46 5.61 0.4012.9 6.36 4.51Manganese 1.12 0.75 8.7 6.0 6 1.57.6 4.9 4.9Nickel 0.56 0.50 9.4 8.9 4.9 1.08.84 8.34 4.34Selenium ND 1.0 9.7 9.4 11.3 2.09.7 9.4 11CorrectedMethod 29 Lab ResultsSampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.21Lakeland FloridaFibertek InsulationCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]HexChromeRDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]Run 16403004.6 0.33.80Run 26003001.6 0.30.80Run 34803001.20.20.40Blank H2O390 ND 0.20Blank KOH300 0.80 0.20Method 0061 Lab ResultsSampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.21Lakeland FloridaFibertek InsulationVolume (mL)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)Run 1260NDND200200Run 2280NDND200200Run 3280NDND200200Blank H20200NDNDBlank H2SO4210 ND NDRDL1200200CorrectedMethod 26A Lab ResultsFibertek InsulationLakeland FloridaBTEC job # 10-3990.21Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010

### Your Project #: 10-3990.21

Site: FIBERTEK

INSULATION

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/01



## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8257

Received: 2010/10/19, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (

2 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/29 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/26

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/10/26

Weight of Water

from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/10/26

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover

pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 0 8 9 5 H

O 0 8 9 6 H

O 0 8 9 7 H

O 0 8 9 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/13

11:25 17:15 20:50 19:25

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

U n i t s TRAIN RUN 1-OTM28 RUN 2-OTM28 RUN 4-OTM28 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28

Weight g 150 140 150 240 0.1 2308673

DCM Weight g 150 220 210 250 0.1 2308672

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.9 8.0 6.5 5.9 0.50 2311813

Organic Condensible PM mg ND 6.2 31 4.2 1.0 2308671

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 0 9 0 1 H

O 0 9 0 2 H

O 0 9 0 3 H

O 0 9 0 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/13

10:56 14:20 20:25 15:35

COC Number

U n i t s TRAIN RUN 1-OTM27 RUN 2-OTM27 RUN 4-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 7.4 4.5 8.3 0.5 2305844

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 27.4 30.6 30.0 0.30 2312155

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 47 35 60 64 1 2305786

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO0895 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0896 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0897 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0898 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 4-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0901 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO0902 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0903 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0904 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 4-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

GENERAL

COMMENTS

Sample HO0895-01: INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HO0896-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HO0897-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish white residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HO0898-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Blackish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8257

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2305844 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/10/29 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2308671 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 93 % 70

- 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 92 % 70

- 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 0.5 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2311813 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank

matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.21

Site: FIBERTEK

INSULATION

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/29



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8228

Received: 2010/10/19, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/28 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/25

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 1 H

O 0 7 1 2 H

O 0 7 1 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

09:10 15:15 19:50

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 59.4 70.3 0.5 2307782

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.30 157 128 0.30 2311217

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 200 83 84 1 2307784

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/12

14:55

U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 95.2 0.5 2307782

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 172 0.30 2311217

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 84 1 2307784

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 1 H

O 0 7 1 2 H

O 0 7 1 2 H

O 0 7 1 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

09:05 15:10 15:10 19:47

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2311063

Total Arsenic (As) ug 1.09 0.40 2.36 2.36 1.91 0.80 2311063

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2311063

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.11 0.10 25.5 25.6 3.82 0.20 2311063

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.92 0.30 14.1 14.2 8.37 0.60 2311063

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 1.46 1.48 1.13 0.20 2311063

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.10 0.20 14.0 13.9 7.46 0.40 2311063

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.12 0.75 8.7 8.9 6.0 1.5 2311063

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.56 0.50 9.4 9.4 8.9 1.0 2311063

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 9.7 9.9 9.4 2.0 2311063

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/12

14:30

U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.80 2311063

Total Arsenic (As) ug 2.18 0.80 2311063

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.20 2311063

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 1.84 0.20 2311063

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 6.38 0.60 2311063

Total Cobalt (Co) ug 0.63 0.20 2311063

Total Lead (Pb) ug 5.61 0.40 2311063

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 6.0 1.5 2311063

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 4.9 1.0 2311063

Total Selenium (Se) ug 11.3 2.0 2311063

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO0711 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0712 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0712 D u p Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2311063 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 N_R

Maxxam ID HO0713 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0719 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HO0711-01R Normal

HO0712-01R Normal

HO0713-01R LFT

HO0719-01R LFT/LPC

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LPC Loose particulate material in the petri dish

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except HO0711, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HO0712.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8228

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307782 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/10/27 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2311063 N_R Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 100 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 94 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 95 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 86 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 87 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 1.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 93 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 96 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 3.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 98 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 97 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 95 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 95 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 92 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 94 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 2.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 95 % 85

- 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8228

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2311063 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 95 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 87 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 90 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 2.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 93 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 95 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 3.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 93 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 94 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 94 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 93 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 94 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 95 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 0.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 94 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 96 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 94 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 93 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 95 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 1.9 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 0.98, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 0.97, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8228

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2311063 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 0.4 % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 0.6 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 0.8 % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 0.5 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 1.5 % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 0.5 % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental102710 Report



## Date

Contact Name Phone

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level % Spike** 

**Recovery Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80331 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 22 0 10/15/2010 Run 1

80316 10/20/2010 Veronica Bucks 43 0.2 20 10/15/2010 Run 1

80255 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 22 0.7 10/15/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80317 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 40 0 20 10/15/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80341 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 24 0 10/15/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80278 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 41 0.9 20 10/15/2010 Run 2, Trap A

Variability +- 10% 

## Plant/Source 

# Lakeland, FL 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

10/27/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew

Smith msmith@btecinc.com Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available 

## (248)-548-8072

### Your Project #: 10-3990.21

Site: FIBERTEK

INSULATION

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/01



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E7660

Received: 2010/10/19, 17:15

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/27

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/23

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 4 0 H

N 8 0 5 1 H

N 8 0 5 2 H

N 8 0 5 2

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/13

20:02 20:00 13:30 13:30

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 200 210 260 1 2311238

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2311245

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2311245

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 5 3 H

N 8 0 5 4 H N 8 0 5 5

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14

19:00 20:30 13:40

COC Number N/A N/A

U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 280 280 2311238 390 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.2 2307260

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 2311245 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2311245 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 5 6 H

N 8 0 5 8 H

N 8 0 5 8 H

N 8 0 5 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/14 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14

13:45 19:15 19:15 14:15

COC Number

U n i t s BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN 1-M0061 RUN 1-M0061 RUN 2-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 300 1 640 600 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.8 0.2 4.6 4.6 1.6 0.3 2307260

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 6 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/14

18:00

COC Number

U n i t s RUN 3-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 480 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 1.2 0.2 2307260

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HN8040 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8051 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8052 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8052 D u p Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8053 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8054 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Page 4 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HN8055 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8056 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8058 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8058 D u p Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Maxxam ID HN8059 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8061 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 5 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E7660

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307260 LLE Matrix Spike

(HN8058) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 109 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 103 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 0.9 % 20

2311245 A_S Matrix Spike

(HN8052) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 99 % 80

- 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 101 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 100 % 90

- 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 102 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 7