alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
    the Company for the annual period ended June 28, 2003 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                          



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ NANCY PEDOT        
| |                        
| | Nancy Pedot            
| | Chief Executive Officer

Dated: July 9, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**










**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**





**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**










In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael D.
      Michie, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
      applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
                November 19,
                2007
            /s/
                Michael D. MichieMichael
                D. MichieChief
                Financial Officer











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Natural Nutrition, Inc.,
      formerly CSI Business Finance, Inc., (the “Company”) Form 10-QSB for the
      quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities
      and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to his knowledge:




1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.


Date:August
              20, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Wm
                      Chris MathersName:Wm
                Chris MathersTitle:
                Chief
                Financial
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
February 16, 2012

Ms. Lisa Jackson

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Ben Franklin Post Office

P.O. Box 862

Washington, DC 20044

Attn: Chemical Right-to-Know Program

Subject: Submission of documents for 3-Thiophenamine, N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]-

2,4-dimethyl- (CAS No. 170373-17-8) under the EHPV Challenge Program, via 

electronic submission to EHPV-Program-Submissions@epa.gov

Exponent Project No. 1006827.000

Dear Administrator Jackson:

On behalf of BASF Corporation, we are submitting the attached revised test plan and revised 

robust summaries for 3-thiophenamine, N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]-2,4-dimethyl-, also 

referred to as C4 (CAS No. 170373-17-8). Please note that the original test plan and robust 

summaries were based on the racemic C4, 3-thiophenamine, N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)-2,4-

dimethyl- (CAS No. 87676-07-1. This submission correctly reflects the chiral substance.

The submission, made under the U.S. EPA’s Extended High Production Volume Chemical 

Challenge Program, consists of a revised test plan and revised robust summaries for C4 and an 

analog, Dimethenamid (CAS No. 163515-14-8). Use and exposure information is contained in 

the test plan as well as the robust summaries. This revision updates our original submission of 

September 26, 2008.

The documents are being submitted in electronic format (Adobe Acrobat pdf files). In addition, 

we have completed entry of the robust summaries into HPVIS.

If you have difficulty with the electronic submission or require additional information, please 

contact me, as BASF’s representative, by phone (919-228-6480) or e-mail 

(jstaveley@exponent.com). 

1006827.000
Ms. Lisa Jackson

February 16, 2012

Sincerely,

Jane P. Staveley, M.S.P.H.

Senior Managing Scientist

Enclosures (2):

 Revised test plan for C4 (pdf)

 Robust summaries for C4 and Dimethenamid

cc: Dr. Ralph Parod, BASF Corporation

Dr. David Cortes, BASF Corporation

Ms. Christina Franz, American Chemistry Council
#### § 81.52 Answer to notice.

The respondent, applicant or recipient may file an answer to the notice within 20 days after service thereof. Answers shall admit or deny specifically and in detail each allegation of the notice, unless the respondent party is without knowledge, in which case his answer should so state, and the statement will be deemed a denial. Allegations of fact in the notice not denied or controverted by answer shall be deemed admitted. Matters alleged as affirmative defenses shall be separately stated and numbered. Failure of the respondent to file an answer within the 20-day period following service of the notice may be deemed an admission of all matters of fact recited in the notice.
§ 120.115 Applicability to existing vessels. ( a ) Except as otherwise required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, an existing vessel must comply with the regulations on electrical installations, equipment, and material that were applicable to the vessel on March 10, 1996, or, as an alternative, the vessel may comply with the regulations in this part.
( b ) An existing vessel must comply with the requirements of §§ 120.420 and 120.430 of this part.
( c ) New installations of electrical equipment and material, and the repair or replacement of wire and cable, on an existing vessel, which are completed to the satisfaction of the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) on or after March 11, 1996, must comply with this part. Replacement of existing equipment, not including wire or cable, installed on the vessel prior to March 11, 1996, need not comply with the regulations in this part.
#### NATHAN ZINADER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEVIN BUS LINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided June 28, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

Eor the plaintiff-respondent, *Nathan Zinader*and *Jacob Feinberg.*

Eor the defendant-appellant, Record, *Higgins & Teese.*

*594Pee Curiam.

This case was commenced in the District Court of Bayonne. It is a companion case to No. 437, May term, 1929; in addition to the grounds of appeal stated in that case, it is alleged, as a ground of appeal, the court tried the case with a jury of six women, nothwithstanding, the state of demand alleged damages in the sum of $500. The verdict of the jury was a verdict of $500 in favor of the plaintiff. Manifestly, this verdict is illegal and cannot stand. 2 *Comp.*Statv *p.*1999, § 149. The judgment of the Bayonne District Court is therefore reversed.
§ 112.50-3 Hydraulic starting. A hydraulic starting system must meet the following: ( a ) The hydraulic starting system must be a self-contained system that provides the cranking torque and engine starting RPM recommended by the engine manufacturer. The hydraulic starting system must be capable of six consecutive starts, unless a second, separate source of starting energy capable of three consecutive starts is provided. A second, separate source of starting energy may provide three of the required six starts. If a second source is provided, the hydraulic system need only provide three consecutive starts.
( b ) The stored hydraulic pressure must be automatically maintained within the predetermined pressure limits.
( c ) The means of automatically maintaining the hydraulic system within the predetermined pressure limits must be electrically energized from the final emergency bus.
( d ) There must be a means to manually recharge the hydraulic system.
( e ) Charging of the hydraulic starting system must not cause insufficient hydraulic pressure for engine starting.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15267, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28287, June 4, 1996]
#### § 12.611 Requirements to qualify for an STCW endorsement as electro-technical rating (ETR) on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of 750 kW/1,000 HP or more.

(a) To qualify for an STCW endorsement as an electro-technical rating, an applicant must—

(1) Be not less than 18 years of age;

(2) Provide evidence of—

(i) Twelve months of seagoing service, that includes training and experience associated with engine room watchkeeping functions and involves the performance of duties carried out under the supervision of an engineer officer, electro-technical officer, or a qualified STCW engine rating;

(ii) Proof of successful completion of a Coast Guard-approved or -accepted program, which includes not less than 6 months of approved seagoing service; or

(iii) Qualifications meeting the standard of competence specified in Table A-III/7 of the STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see [§ 12.103 of this part](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/part-12/section-12.103)) and approved seagoing service of not less than 3 months;

(3) Provide evidence of meeting the standard of competence specified in Table A-III/7 of the STCW Code; and

(4) Provide evidence of completion of an approved course in—

(i) Computer systems and maintenance; and

(ii) High-voltage power systems.

(b) An applicant who holds an STCW endorsement as able seafarer-engine and a national rating endorsement as electrician, electrician/refrigerating engineer, or junior engineer will be issued the ETR endorsement upon completion of the requirements in Section A-III/7 of the STCW Code and evidence of completion of the training required in [paragraph (a)(4)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-12.611#p-12.611(a)(4)) of this section.

(c) Seafarers with the following national rating endorsement will be eligible for this endorsement upon completion of the requirements designated in this section:

Table 1 to [§ 12.611](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-12.611)(c)—STCW Endorsement as Electro-§ Technical Rating

| Entry path from national endorsements | Sea service under authority of the endorsement1 | Competence—STCW Table A-III/72 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Electrician/refrigerating engineer | None | Y |
| Junior engineer | None | Y |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 This column provides the minimum additional service required of the seafarer in order to meet the requirements of this section. | | |
| 2 Complete any items in [paragraph (a)(3)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-12.611#p-12.611(a)(3)) of this section not previously satisfied. | | |
Q:\gpo16426
----

*go to a larger version of Plate 4 (5.1MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, A-1-98-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, CEO, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


May 15, 2008



23
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Audit Division Recommendation ) Agenda Document No. 14-31 

Memorandum on the Democratic Party of ) 

Illinois (DPIL) (All-15) ) 

CERTIFICATIQN 

I, Shelley E. Can, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting on 

June 26,2014 do hereby certify that the Commission took die following actions in the abovecaptioned matter: 

1. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve Finding 1 (Misstatement of Financial Activity) 

and Finding 4 (Unrqjorted Levin Fund Activity) as set forth in Agenda Document No. 

14-31. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

2. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to approve Finding 2 (Recordkeeping for Employees) as set 

forth in Agenda Document No. 14-31, including the failure to keep monthly time-logs 

for the $729,125 in payroll consisting of payments allocated between federal and nonfederal funds and 100% non-federal payments. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted afTumatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Goodman, Nunter, and Pi^erseii dssent^. 
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for A11 -1S 

June 26,2014 

3. Decided by a vote of 6-0 approve Finding 2 (Recordkeeping for Employees) as set 

forth in Agenda Document No. 14-31, related to the failure to keep monthly timelogs for the $414,078 in payroll allocated between federal and non-federal funds; and 

Direct the Audit Division to include in the Proposed Final Audit Report an Additional 

Issues section addressing the $315,047 for 100% non-federal payments. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

4. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to find, in Finding 3 (Fundraising Receipts), that the 

Democratic Party of Illinois did not verify, affirm, represent, or otherwise establish 

that the contributions totaling $68,300 may be deposited into a federal account. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Conunissioners Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen dissented. 

Attest: 

(/ Date ShyiQfE.Garr () 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Commission
### Docket No. FAA

- 2016

- 4228 Dir ID 2015

- NM

- 107

- AD

. Contacts. W ith wh o m o u tside t he FAA h a s th i s prop os al been di s cu s sed?

Organ i zat i on Person Cont a cted Date Respon s e

National B u s ine s s Aircraft As s ociation Eli C o tti 7/17/15

Re g ional Airline As soci a tion 7/17/15

Aircr a ft O w ners & Pilots A s soci a tion David O o rd 7/17/15

Airlines for A m erica R o bert Ireland 7/17/15
# C_2008237EN.01000701.xml

| 16.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/7

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/M.4854 — TomTom/Tele Atlas

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2008/C 237/11)

On 22 October 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which TomTom NV (‘TomTom’) would acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Tele Atlas NV (‘Tele Atlas’) by way of a public bid.

1

After examination of the notification, the Commission concluded on 28 November 2007 that the notified operation fell within the scope of the Merger Regulation and that it raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and the EEA Agreement. The Commission therefore initiated proceedings in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation.

Access to key documents was provided to the notifying party on 3 and 12 December 2007, in accordance with paragraph 45 of DG Competition's Best Practices on the conduct of EC merger control proceedings.

The Commission sent a Statement of Objections (‘SO’) to TomTom on 29 February 2008. Tele Atlas also received a copy of the SO. TomTom was granted access to file upon issuance of the SO. TomTom and Tele Atlas replied jointly on 17 March 2008. The parties did not request a formal oral hearing.

I granted requests from eight undertakings to be admitted to the proceedings as interested third parties within the meaning of Article 18(4) of the Merger Regulation and Article 11(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004. TomTom was granted access to non-confidential versions of written comments submitted by four of the third parties.

As a result of the in-depth investigation, the Commission has concluded that the proposed concentration does not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it.

In the light of the above, I consider that the rights to be heard in the present proceeding have been respected.

Brussels, 6 May 2008.

Karen WILLIAMS

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### David M. Gurofsky, as Administrator of the Estate of Fanny C. Gurofsky, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Respondent.

*Gicrofsky*v. *Lehigh Valley R. R. Go.,*121 App. Div. 126, affirmed.

(Argued November 24, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment entered December 3, 1907, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, overruling plaintiff’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant upon the verdict directed by the trial court in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.

*Vernon Cole*for appellant.

*Daniel J. Kenefick, Lyman M. Bass*and *Elton H. Beals*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edavabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Webneb and Chase, JJ.
Case 1:11-cv-02189-EGS Document 20 Filed 05/17/13 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02189-EGS Document 20 Filed 05/17/13 Page 2 of 2
#### McCrimmon v. The State.

Submitted October 16,

Decided November 7, 1906.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Parker. Coffee superior court. June 27, 1906.

*Rogers & Heath, L. G. Harrell, O'Steen & Tomlin,*and *E. S. Fuller,*for plaintiff in error. *John W. Bennett, solicitor-general,.*and *Quincey & McDonald,*contra.

Cobb, J.

1. When in a criminal case, after verdict, an attack is made upon a juror upon the ground that he was not impartial, the trial judge occupies the place of a trior, and his finding that the juror is competent will' not be reversed, unless under all the facts the discretion of the judge' is manifestly abused. No abuse of discretion appears in this case.. *Jones*v. *State,*117 *Ga.*710 (4); *Sullivan*v. *State,*121 *Ga.*183 (4).

2. A new trial will not be granted in a criminal case because of the relationship, within the prohibited degrees, of a juror to the accused, although such relationship was unknown to the accused or his counsel, until after verdict. *Downing*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*30, and cit.

3. There was evidence authorizing a finding that the accused ,was guilty of the offense of voluntary manslaughter', and the judge did not err in. refusing to set aside the verdict convicting him of this offense.

*Judgment afp/rmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 112.30-10 Restoration of normal source potential.

When the potential from the normal source is restored to 85 to 95 percent of its normal value, the emergency loads must transfer automatically to the normal source.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:13−cr−20892−GCS−RSW

Hon. George Caram Steeh

Kutub Mesiwala, et al.,

Defendant(s),

NOTICE TO APPEAR

 The following defendant(s) are hereby notified to appear: Kutub Mesiwala

 The defendant(s) shall appear before District Judge George Caram Steeh at the United

States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Boulevard, Room

1067, Detroit, Michigan, for the following proceeding(s):

• STATUS CONFERENCE: September 14, 2021 at 02:00 PM

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/B Sauve 

Case Manager

Dated: August 27, 2021

Case 2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW ECF No. 488, PageID.3497 Filed 08/27/21 Page 1 of 1