alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                           Certification pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Michael R. Kallet, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Eric E. Stickels,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oneida Financial Corp.
(the "Company"), each certify in his/her capacity as an officer of the Company
that he/she has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and that to the best of his/her knowledge:

     (5)  the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (6)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


 August 13, 2003                           /s/ Michael R. Kallet
-----------------                          -------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


 August 13, 2003                           /s/ Eric E. Stickels
-----------------                          -------------------------------------
Date                                       Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in
           the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1999 and
           is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
           Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<CASH>                                       53,077
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                32,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3,054
<INVENTORY>                                  26,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            114,955
<PP&E>                                      451,293
<DEPRECIATION>                              129,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              442,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        29,785
<BONDS>                                     230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         44
<OTHER-SE>                                  165,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                442,540
<SALES>                                     239,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            239,531
<CGS>                                       221,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               221,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             37,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           10,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (30,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (9,001)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (21,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (21,002)
<EPS-BASIC>                                ($0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                ($0.48)


</TABLE>
§ 12.613 Requirements to qualify for an STCW endorsement in proficiency in survival craft and rescue boats other than fast rescue boats (PSC). ( a ) To qualify for an STCW endorsement in proficiency in survival craft and rescue boats other than fast rescue boats (PSC), the applicant must— ( 1 ) Be at least 18 years of age;
( 2 ) Meet the requirements for a lifeboatman endorsement in § 12.407 of this part and Table A-VI/2-1 of the STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see § 12.103 of this part); and
( 3 ) Complete basic training (BT), found in § 12.602 of this subpart.
( b ) *Continued professional competence.* ( 1 ) Seafarers qualified in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section must provide evidence of maintaining the standard of competence as set out in Table A-VI/2-1 of the STCW Code every 5 years.
( 2 ) The Coast Guard will accept onboard training and experience, through evidence of 1 year of sea service within the last 5 years, as meeting the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section for the following areas, as set out in Table A-VI/2-1 of the STCW Code: ( i ) Taking charge of a survival craft or rescue boat during and after launch, including— ( A ) Interpreting the markings on survival craft as to the number of persons they are intended to carry;
( B ) Giving correct commands for launching and boarding survival craft, clearing the ship, and handling and disembarking persons from survival craft;
( C ) Preparing and safely launch survival craft, operating its engine, and clearing the ship's side quickly; and
( D ) Safely recovering survival craft and rescue boats.
( ii ) Operating a survival craft engine, including— ( A ) Rowing and steering a boat and steer by compass;
( B ) Using individual items of equipment of survival craft, except for pyrotechnics; and
( C ) Rigging devices to aid location.
( iii ) Using locating devices, including communication and signaling apparatus, including— ( A ) Using of portable radio equipment for survival craft.
( B ) [Reserved]
( iv ) Applying first aid to survivors.
( 3 ) The Coast Guard will only accept evidence of assessments conducted ashore as meeting the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section for the areas not included in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, as set out in Table A-VI/2-1 of the STCW Code.
( 4 ) Applicants who cannot meet the requirement for 1 year of sea service within the last 5 years, as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, will be required to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section or complete approved or accepted refresher training.
( c ) Seafarers holding an MMD or MMC endorsement as lifeboatman before January 1, 2017 will be eligible for this endorsement upon showing evidence of sea service of not less than 12 months within the last 60 months. The sea service must be completed prior to January 1, 2017.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77975, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30882, June 28, 2019]
Exhibit 32.1


           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of International Imaging Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
2006, I, C. Leo Smith, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

         1.       Such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
                  ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       The information contained in such amended Quarterly Report on
                  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of International Imaging Systems,
                  Inc.

                                    INTERNATIONAL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.



Dated: July 27, 2006                By: /s/ C. LEO SMITH
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        C. Leo Smith, President, Chief Executive
                                        Officer, and Chief Financial Officer


                                     - 17 -
#### § 92.205 Requirement to make reasonable modifications.

A covered entity must make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, or procedures in its health programs and activities when such modifications are necessary to avoid discrimination on the basis of disability, unless the covered entity can demonstrate that making the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the health program or activity. For the purposes of this section, the term “reasonable modifications” shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the term as set forth in the ADA title II regulation at 28 CFR 35.130(b)(7).
§ 113.30-20 General requirements. ( a ) The communications stations listed in § 113.30-5(a) through (d), (f), (g), and (i) and other communications stations for the operation of the vessel, such as the captain's and chief engineer's offices and staterooms, emergency power room, carbon dioxide (or other extinguishing agent) control room, and firepump room, must not be on the same circuit as communications stations installed to meet the requirements of §§ 113.30-5(e) and 113.30-5(h).
( b ) If a communications station is in the weather and on the same circuit as other required stations, there must be a cut-out switch on the navigating bridge that can isolate this station from the rest of the stations, unless the system possesses other effective means of station isolation during a fault condition.
( c ) No jack-box or headset may be on a communication system that includes any station required by this subpart, except for a station installed to meet 46 CFR 113.30-5(h) or 46 CFR 113.30-25(f).
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28289, June 4, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65201, Oct. 31, 2008]
# C_2008177EN.01000801.xml

| 12.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

(2008/C 177/04)

Aid No: XA 7006/08

Member State: Italy

Title of aid scheme: Decreto del direttore generale dello sviluppo rurale del ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali prot. 2065 del 13 febbraio 2008 recante «Procedura concorsuale per la selezione di progetti di ricerca e sviluppo nel settore dell'agricoltura proposti dalle piccole e medie imprese condotte da giovani imprenditori agricoli, da realizzarsi attraverso la collaborazione di Istituzioni pubbliche di ricerca»

Legal basis: Legge 15 dicembre 1998, n. 441, recante «Norme per la diffusione e la valorizzazione dell'imprenditoria in agricoltura».

Legge 27 dicembre 2006, n. 296 (legge finanziaria 2007), art. 1, comma 1068 e comma 1074

Annual expenditure planned: EUR 4 000 000

Maximum aid intensity: The aid will be calculated in compliance with the maximum intensity provided for by the Community legislation in force (Article 5a of Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004)

Date of implementation: The scheme will enter into force from the date of the publication of the registration number of the exemption request on the website of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: Five years

Objective of aid: The aid is intended to promote research and development among small and medium-sized enterprises active in the agricultural sector, within the meaning of Article 5a of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 364/2004

Sector concerned: Young farmers

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali |
| --- |
| Dipartimento delle politiche di sviluppo |
| Direzione generale dello sviluppo rurale |
| Via XX Settembre n. 20 |
| I-00187 Roma |

Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali

Dipartimento delle politiche di sviluppo

Direzione generale dello sviluppo rurale

Via XX Settembre n. 20

I-00187 Roma

Website: http://www.politicheagricole.it/SviluppoRurale/AiutiStato/DisposizioniNazionali/07-20080213_BandoC_2065_SR_OIGA.htm

IL DIRETTORE GENERALE

IL DIRETTORE GENERALE

(Dott. Salvatore PETROLI)

---
#### Emerson C. Dell, Respondent, *v.*Arthur A. Fletcher et al., Appellants.

*Tell*v. *Fletcher,*136 App. Div. —, appeal dismissed.

(Argued January 3, 1910;

decided January 11, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a j udgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial *555department, entered December 13,1909, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Erie County Court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had- unanimously decided that the findings of fact are supported by the evidence, that the exceptions were frivolous and presented no question of law for review.

*Percy S. Lansdowne*for motion.

*Charles*Newton, opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
v055340_ex10-21 Page

 

 









 

v055340_ex10-22 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-23 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-24 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-25 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-26 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-27 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-28 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-29 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-210 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-211 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-212 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-213 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-214 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-215 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-216 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-217 Page

 









---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
# C_2008190EN.01000501.xml

| 29.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 190/04)

| Aid No | XE 19/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | Észak-Alföld |
| Title of aid scheme | Foglalkoztatási támogatás Mátészalka Város Önkormányzat vagyonrendelete alapján |
| Legal basis | Mátészalka Város Önkormányzat vagyonáról, a vagyontárgyak feletti tulajdonosi jogok gyakorlásáról szóló 20/2006 (VIII.25.) rendelet |
| Budget | Annual budget: HUF 100 million
  Overall budget: — |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 25.4.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2008 |
| Objective | Art. 4: Creation of employment |
| Economic sectors | All Community sectors (1) eligible for employment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Mátészalka Város Önkormányzata |
| Hosök tere 9 |
| H-4700 Mátészalka |

Aid No

XE 19/08

Member State

Hungary

Region

Észak-Alföld

Title of aid scheme

Foglalkoztatási támogatás Mátészalka Város Önkormányzat vagyonrendelete alapján

Legal basis

Mátészalka Város Önkormányzat vagyonáról, a vagyontárgyak feletti tulajdonosi jogok gyakorlásáról szóló 20/2006 (VIII.25.) rendelet

Budget

Annual budget: HUF 100 million

Overall budget: —

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

25.4.2008

Duration

31.12.2008

Objective

Art. 4: Creation of employment

Economic sectors

All Community sectors (1) eligible for employment aid

1

Name and address of the granting authority

Mátészalka Város Önkormányzata

Hosök tere 9

H-4700 Mátészalka

---

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.

1

---
[No. 3400.]

#### California Milling and Mining Co., Limited, v. Rocky Mountain National Bank et al.

Appeal entered as a writ of error on the authority of Western Lumber & Pole Co. v. City of Golden, ante.

*Appeal from Gilpin District Court.*Hon. Flor Ashbaugh, Judge.

Mr. Hénry J. Hersey, Mr. Arthur Ponsford, Mr. William E. Hutton, Messrs. Dayton & Deni- ' ous, for appellants.

Mr. H. A. Hicks, Mr. Charles W. Waterman, for appellees.

Cunningham, Judge.

Appellants have filed a motion to remand this cause to the supreme court, and appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The judgment‘in the case does not appear to relate to a franchise or to a freehold, and does not amount, exclusive of costs, to the sum of $100.00, nor is the construction of any provision of the state or federal constitution necessary to the determination of the cause. Therefore, the motion of appellants to remand the cause must be denied, and for the same reason the motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal should be granted.

The principal contention of the parties on brief and on oral argument pertains to the right of this court to re-enter the case as pending on error. We have just decided, in the case of *The Western Lumber and Pole Company v. City of Golden,*case No. 3386, that this court has the authority, and that it *238is its duty, under facts and conditions similar to those presented by the record in the instant case, to order the case re-entered as pending on error.

Decided May 13, A. D. 1912.

Rehearing denied June 10, A. D. 1912.

The motion of the appellants to remand the case is denied. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and on the authority of the *Western Lumber and Pole Company*case, *supra,*and for the reasons assigned in the opinion handed down in that case, it is ordered that this case be re-entered as pending on error.

Hublbut, Judge, dissents from so much of the opinion as pertains to the right of this court to reenter the case as pending on error.
§ 122.260 Reports of potential vessel casualty. ( a ) An owner, charterer, managing operator, or agent of a vessel shall immediately notify either of the following Coast Guard offices if there is reason to believe the vessel is lost or imperiled: ( 1 ) The Coast Guard district rescue coordination center (RCC) cognizant over the area in which the vessel was last operating; or
( 2 ) The Coast Guard search and rescue authority nearest to where the vessel was last operating.
( b ) Reasons for belief that a vessel is in distress include, but are not limited to, lack of communication with or nonappearance of the vessel.
( c ) The owner, charterer, managing operator, or agent notifying the Coast Guard under paragraph (a) of this section, shall provide the name and identification number of the vessel, a description of the vessel, the names or number of individuals on board, and other information that may be requested by the Coast Guard.
§ 108.715 Magnetic compass and gyrocompass. ( a ) Each self-propelled unit in ocean or coastwise service must have a magnetic compass.
( b ) Each self-propelled unit of 1,600 gross tons and over in ocean or coastwise service must have a gyrocompass in addition to the magnetic compass required in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each unit that is required to have a gyrocompass must have an illuminated repeater for the gyrocompass that is at the main steering stand unless the gyrocompass is illuminated and is at the main steering stand.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat amounts paid for 

umbilical cord blood banking services as medical care expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2009 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. HERGER, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. PASCRELL, 

and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat 

amounts paid for umbilical cord blood banking services 

as medical care expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS PAID FOR UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD 

4 BANKING SERVICES TREATED AS MEDICAL 

5 CARE EXPENSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 213(d) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining medical 

8 care) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara9 graph (C), by striking the period at the end of subparaVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:12 Mar 26, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1718.IH H1718

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1718 IH

1 graph (D) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by inserting after sub2 paragraph (D) the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(E) for private umbilical cord blood bank4 ing services provided by any accredited umbil5 ical cord blood bank which is in compliance 

6 with the regulations under section 361 of the 

7 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264).’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
1

08-5660-cr

United States v. Pearl

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order

filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 32.1 and this court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document

filed with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with

the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any

party not represented by counsel. 

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the

Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on

the 16 day of April, two thousand ten. th

Present:

José A. Cabranes,

Barrington D. Parker,

Reena Raggi,

Circuit Judges.

_______________________________________

United States of America,

Appellee,

v. No. 08-5660-cr

Brian Pearl,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________

FOR APPELLEE: Burton T. Ryan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, for

Benton J. Campbell, United States Attorney for the

Eastern District of New York, Central Islip, NY.

FOR APPELLANT: David A. Lewis, Assistant Federal Defender, Federal

Defenders of New York, Inc., New York, NY.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

(Joseph F. Bianco, Judge).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND

DECREED that the appeal be DISMISSED as moot.
2

Defendant Brian Pearl appeals from a November 20, 2008 order of the District Court

convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of violating the conditions of his supervised release, revoking

his supervised release, and sentencing him to fourteen months’ imprisonment. 

In response to an order entered by this Court on February 17, 2010, both parties have filed

letter briefs asserting that Pearl was released from prison on October 21, 2009. As Pearl is no longer in

prison and is not serving a term of supervised release, his appeal is moot. See, e.g., Spencer v. Kemna, 523

U.S. 1 (1998).

Accordingly, we dismiss Pearl’s appeal as moot. 

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk