alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 15th meeting of the American Health Information Community Population Health and Clinical Care Connections Workgroup [formerly Biosurveillance Workgroup] in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

      ( print page 14816)    

# DATES:

April 20, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Room 505A (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue deliberation on response management. The meeting will include testimony on Communications, and Countermeasure Allocation, Distribution and Administration tracking during a public health response.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​pop_​instruct.html.*

Dated: March 22, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-1540 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 129.375 System grounding. ( a ) If a grounded distribution system is provided, there must be only one connection to ground, regardless of the number of power sources. This connection must be at the main switchboard.
( b ) On each metallic vessel, a grounded distribution system must be grounded to the hull. On each nonmetallic vessel, the neutral of a grounded system must be connected to a common ground plate, except that no aluminum grounding conductors may be used.
( c ) On each nonmetallic vessel with a grounded distribution system, the common ground plate must have— ( 1 ) Only one connection to the main switchboard; and
( 2 ) The connection to itself readily accessible for checking.
( d ) On each nonmetallic vessel with a ground plate provided for radio equipment, the plate must be connected to the common ground plate.
( e ) Each insulated grounding-conductor of a cable must be identified by one of the following means: ( 1 ) Wrapping of the cable with green braid or green insulation.
( 2 ) Stripping of the insulation from the entire exposed length of the grounding-conductor.
( 3 ) Marking of the exposed insulation of the grounding-conductor with green tape or green adhesive labels.
( f ) No vessel's hull may carry current as a conductor except for— ( 1 ) An impressed-current cathodic-protection system; or
( 2 ) A battery system to start an engine.
( g ) No cable armor may be used to ground electrical equipment or systems.
( h ) Each receptacle outlet and attachment plug, for a portable lamp, tool, or similar apparatus operating at 100 or more volts, must have a grounding-pole and a grounding-conductor in the portable cord.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10934-10935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 061109296-7009-02; I.D. 030607B]


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery; Quota Transfer

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason quota transfer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the Commonwealth of Virginia is 
transferring 150,000 lb (68,039 kg) of commercial bluefish quota to the 
State of New York from its 2007 quota. By this action, NMFS adjusts the 
quotas and announces the revised commercial quota for each state 
involved.

DATES: Effective March 7, 2007 through December 31, 2007, unless NMFS 
publishes a superseding document in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Potts, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9341, FAX (978) 281-9135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from Florida through Maine. The process to set the 
annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state is 
described in Sec.  648.160.
    Two or more states, under mutual agreement and with the concurrence 
of the Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), 
can transfer or combine bluefish commercial quota under Sec.  
648.160(f). The Regional Administrator is required to consider the 
criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) in the evaluation of requests 
for quota transfers or combinations.
    Virginia has agreed to transfer 150,000 lb (68,039 kg) of its 2007 
commercial quota to New York. The Regional Administrator has determined 
that the

[[Page 10935]]

criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) have been met. The revised 
bluefish quotas for calendar year 2007 are: New York, 1,034,278 lb 
(469,141 kg); and Virginia, 868,660 lb (394,018 kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 6, 2007.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 07-1148 Filed 3-7-07; 2:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
§ 12.709 Apprentice engineers. ( a ) Persons enrolled in an engineer training program approved by the Coast Guard, and who present a letter or other documentary evidence that they are enrolled, may be issued an MMC endorsed as apprentice engineer and may be signed on ships as such. The endorsement as apprentice engineer may be in addition to other endorsements; however, this endorsement does not authorize the holder to replace any of the regular required crew.
( b ) Persons holding the endorsement as apprentice engineer are deemed to be seamen.
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dane Alexander, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Dane AlexanderDane Alexander, Senior Vice President of Accounting and Financial Reporting (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


August 14, 2006
#### In Re William F. McKenna.

May Term, 1906.

Present: Rowell, C. J., Tyler, Munson, Watson, Powers, and Miles, JJ.

Opinion filed May 21, 1906.

*Prisoners*— Term *of Imprisonment*— Reduction *by Good Behavior*— Forfeiture—V. *S. 5214.*

The deduction of time for good behavior allowed a prisoner in the state prison pursuant to V. S. 5274, is not forfeited by a breach of a subsequent conditional pardon.

When a prisoner who has been at large on a conditional. pardon is recommitted to serve the remainder of his term, the time he has been so at large is not to be treated as time served on his sentence.

Habeas Corpus returnable at Montpelier in Washington County before *Rowell,*C. J., and by him duly adjourned into the Supreme Court at its May Term, 1906, and heard at that term.

*Charles Batchelder*for the relator.

*Clarke C. Fitts,*Attorney General, for the respondent.

Munson, J.

The relator was committed to the state prison March 16, 1905, under a sentence of imprisonment for a term of not more than fifteen months and not less than twelve months. January 25, 1906, he was released from confinement on accepting a conditional pardon, which provided that upon a violation of its conditions the pardon should become void, and he be returned to his former condition of custody to serve the remainder of his term. During this confinement his behavior was such that he was allowed five days on each *35month in reduction of his sentence, pursuant to V. S. 5274. March 15, 1906, he was returned to .the state prison to serve the remainder of his term, upon an order of recommitment which recited a violation of the conditions of his pardon. The relator claims that his present detention is unlawful because of the expiration of his sentence.

We do not consider it necessary to discuss the questions raised by the petition. The subject of conditional pardons was examined by the judges in preparing a reply to inquiries submitted by the Governor in 1901, and the results of their examination will be found in *Re Conditional Discharge of Con*victs, 73 Vt. 414, 51 Atl. 10.

The sentence is for the maximum term, and the allowance for good behavior is to be deducted from the maximum term. The deduction allowed for good behavior previous to the conditional pardon is not forfeited by the breach of the conditions of .the pardon, but stands to the credit of the prisoner in the final computation of his sentence. When a prisoner who has been at large on a conditional pardon is recommitted to serve the' remainder of his term, the time he has so been at large is not to be treated as time served on his sentence. The remainder of the term to be served on recommitment is that part of the term that remained unexpired at the'time he was set at large by the conditional pardon.

*Relator remanded.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 15009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1608]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 15009]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-15 of March 19, 
                2007

                
Presidential Determination on the Eligibility of 
                the Republic of Montenegro and the Republic of Serbia 
                To Receive Defense Articles and Defense Services

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 503(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                of 1961, as amended, and section 3(a)(1) of the Arms 
                Export Control Act, as amended, I hereby find that the 
                furnishing of defense articles and defense services to 
                the Republic of Montenegro and the Republic of Serbia 
                will strengthen the security of the United States and 
                promote world peace.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress and to arrange for the 
                publication of this determination in the Federal 
                Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 07-1608
Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
R. Gerber, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Robert R. Gerber
-----------------------------------
Robert R. Gerber
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
September 28, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         9
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                             4,112
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                 0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                  35,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       97,041
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>            19,077
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>              19,090
<LOANS>                          124,366
<ALLOWANCE>                        1,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   283,759
<DEPOSITS>                       196,753
<SHORT-TERM>                           0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                4,625
<LONG-TERM>                            0
<COMMON>                              57
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                        82,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>   283,759
<INTEREST-LOAN>                    9,783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                  4,483
<INTEREST-OTHER>                   3,666
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                  17,932
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 9,022
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 9,022
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              8,910
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        195
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                    33
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    4,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    5,453
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>         5,453
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       3,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                      3.44
<LOANS-NON>                        1,369
<LOANS-PAST>                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                    2,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   1,950
<CHARGE-OFFS>                        323
<RECOVERIES>                          11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  1,833
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                 874
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>              959
        

</TABLE>
#### Darling v. Brewster.

*Pleading—omission to answer admits allegations of complaint. Accounting.*

A complaint stated that plaintiff owned a share in a vessel, and the defendants . the remaining shares; that plaintiff made repairs to the vessel, and furnished materials therefor to the value of $2,101.60; that defendants promised to pay their share of the amount; that they had paid $500, and that there remained due $1,551.64, and the complaint asked for an accounting. Defendants demurred; the demurrer was overruled and defendants did not answer; and an accounting was ordered before a referee. *Held,*that defendants, by omitting to answer, admitted the allegations of the complaint, one of which was that there was due plaintiff for repairs, etc., $1,551.64, and the admission of that item by the referee, as proved, was proper.

Appeal by defeudants from a judgment ordered at special term upon the report of a referee, and from an order overruling excep*671tions to such report; also, from an order denying motion to strike out portions of the judgment roll.

*Richard H. Huntley,*for appellants.

*Scudder & Carter,*for respondents.

Davis, P. J.

The only point of general interest passed upon in.the opinion is sufficiently stated in the head-note.

*Orders affirmed.*
150°0'0"W

150°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

60°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

Figure 27. Alternative E

Airplane Access to Lakes in Designated

Wilderness South of the Sterling Highway

Produced in the Division of Realty

and Natural Resources

Anchorage, Alaska

Current to: February 28, 2008

Kenai

NWR

Anchorage

Map

Extent

0 2.5 5 10

Miles

08-0064 JGB

Note: This map does not address land ownership.

0 3.5 7 14

Kilometers

Soldotna

Cooper Landing

Skilak Lake

Open

Early Access

Andrew Simons Wilderness Area

Mystery Creek Wilderness Area

Refuge Boundary

Kachemak

Bay

Lower Russian

Lake

Upper Russian Lake

Pothole Lake

East & West Twin Lakes

Harvey Lake

Fox Lake

Point Lake

Tustumena Lake

Nikolai

Lake

Iceberg Lake

Green Lake

High Lake

Windy Lake

North & South

Kolomin Lakes

Four Unnamed Lakes in

T. 1 S., R. 9 W., Sec. 4-9

Two Unnamed Lakes in

T. 1 S., R. 10 W., Sec. 1-2

Dinglestadt Glacier

Terminus Lake

Martin Lake

Emerald Lake

Wosnesenski Glacier

Terminus Lake

Sterling Highway
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent
B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Trent B. Troyer
-----------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 28, 2006
#### Dickinson v. Water Commissioners of Poughkeepsie.

*Contract—construction*of—Boidence— *natv/re of hard-pa/n.*

In a contract in which plaintiff agreed to excavate rock at one price and earth at another, it was provided that “ work not herein classed or defined as to price shall he paid for at cost and fifteen per cent added.” In an action for work done under the contract, *held,*that evidence was admissible to show that hard-pan was neither rock nor earth.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the verdict of a jury.

*186The action was brought in Dutchess county by Pomeroy P. Dickinson and others against the Water Commissioners of the city of Poughkeepsie to recover for work, labor and services under a contract for excavating. The opinion states sufficiently the only material point in the case.

*Nelson, Cooke & Thorn*and *A. Anthony,*for appellants.

*Thompson & Weeks,*for respondent.

Tappen, J.

The plaintiff entered into a contract in writing with defendants for work on a reservoir, which contract contained the following clause : “Work not herein classed, or defined as to price, and which said contractors may be directed by said engineer in writing to do, shall be paid for at cost and fifteen per cent added.” The contract provided for earth excavation at one price and rock excavation at another price. The plaintiff brought the action to recover compensation for other excavations, which he claimed were not rock or earth, and were, therefore, not classed. The excavation in dispute was known as hard-pan. At the trial the plaintiff offered to prove that it was neither rock nor earth, and not included in those items in the contract. The court refused to admit the testimony and nonsuited the plaintiff.

We are of opinion that such testimony was admissible, and that its rejection was error. The judgment should, for that reason,,be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

*Judgment reversed and new trial*ordered.