alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDDK.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDDK.
    Date: April 12, 2007.
    Time: 8:15 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, building 10, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Room 9S235, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Marvin C. Gershengorn, MD, Scientific Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Diabetes and 
Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bldg. 10, rm. 9N222, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-
4129.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and state the purpose of their visit.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 8, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1227 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 20302 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Cayetano Rosales Vasquez,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 105

- 1

Before **Davis, Elrod,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cayetano Rosales Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rosales Vasquez has not filed a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 2, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-20302 Document: 00515883918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2021No. 20

- 20302

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue fo r appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5 th**  **C ir**  **. R.** 42. 2. Case: 20-20302 Document: 00515883918 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2021
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
            Financial Data Schedule Decmeber 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                 0001005663
<NAME>                ITC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the twelve month period ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,988
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,686
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,463
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (49,162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (49,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (49,162)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)





</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BRIAN FARMER, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-13023 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

On March 12, 2015, the Court granted a motion by Gary D. Nitzkin, counsel for 

Plaintiff Brian Farmer (“Farmer”), to withdraw from this action. (See the “Order,” ECF 

#53.) The Court also ordered Farmer to “either (1) retain new counsel, who shall file a 

notice of appearance with the [C]ourt no later than April 17, 2015; or (2) notify the Court 

in writing ... that he intends to proceed pro se and confirming his mailing address by no 

later than April 17, 2015.” (Id. at 2.) The Court specifically cautioned Farmer that 

“failure to comply with any portion of th[e] Order may result in dismissal of this action.” 

(Id.) Farmer was served with a copy of the Order on March 13, 2015. (See ECF #54.) 

The deadline for complying with the Order has passed. Farmer has not notified the 

Court that he intends to proceed pro se, nor has new counsel for Farmer filed a notice of 

appearance with the Court. 

2:14-cv-13023-MFL-RSW Doc # 55 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 406
2 

Farmer served a copy of his Complaint on Defendant Hillcrest Davidson & 

Associates (“Hillcrest”) on February 23, 2015 (when he was still represented by counsel). 

(See ECF #49.) The deadline for Hillcrest to respond to the Complaint has passed. 

However, Farmer has not sought the entry of a default as to Hillcrest. Nor has Farmer 

sought to advance this action in any other way since the entry of the Order. 

The Court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with a court order and/or 

for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 

626, 629-30 (1962). Despite the Court’s specific warning that his failure to comply with 

the Order by April 17, 2015, could result in dismissal, Farmer did not comply. Moreover, 

Farmer has failed to prosecute the action as to Hillcrest. Accordingly, dismissal of the 

action is warranted. 

For the reasons explained above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Farmer’s 

Amended Complaint (ECF #23) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This 

matter is closed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 1, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or 

counsel of record on May 1, 2015, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-13023-MFL-RSW Doc # 55 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 407
#### § 119.100 Intent; preemptive effect.

This part contains requirements for the design, construction, installation, and operation of propulsion and auxiliary machinery, piping and pressure systems steering apparatus, and associated safety systems. Machinery and equipment installed on each vessel must be suitable for the vessel and its operation and for the purpose intended. The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 922, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33883, June 7, 2012]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 24, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-30857

Summary Calendar

_____________________

CAROLYN ANDERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana, Lake Charles

USDC No. 2:05-CV-546

__________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by
2

Magistrate Judge Wilson in his report of May 12, 2006 and affirmed by the district

court.

AFFIRMED.
FEDERALsELECTIG
COMMISSION wk ‘
1325 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463
Phone: Local 523-4065 Toll Free 800-424-9530

FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY
JANUARY 28, 1983
FEC RELEASES NEW PAC TALLIES
WASHINGTON ~- Campaign finance records reveal that PAC's have contributed nearly
$86 million to federal candidates fran January 1, 1981, through late November
1982. Most of that money was contributed to 1982 Congressional races.
However, at least $4 million was given to candidates for previous election debts.
The preliminary information released today by the Federal Election
Commission indicates that PAC's increased their total spending by 50% over
the same time period in 1979-80, and by 150% over what was spent in the
1977-78 election cycle. :
Money raised and spent by PAC's for 23-month periods in three election
cycles is as follows: .
1981-82 1979-80 1977-78
$ 44.3 $ 42.2 $ 32.1 $ 30.7 $16.7 $14.9
36.3 35.8 25.9 25.3 19.1 18.7
62.6 62.2 . 32.4 15.0 16.1

4.6
43.1 41.8 3.9 32.5 24.2 23.6
4.0 3.7 2.8 2.7 1.9
1.0

Corp. w/o Stock 2.6 2.0
Total $192.9 $187.7 $130.3 $124.6 $7

**Figures are in millions of dollars and. are not
adjusted for transfers between affiliated committees.

1.9
1.0 0.4 0.4
7.3 $75.6

Contributions made during the 23-month period to all federal candidates
(for 1982 campaigns and debt retirement) totalled:

20.4
Non-Connected 10.7
Trade/Member/Health . 22.6
Cooperative 2.1
Corp. w/o Stock “La1

Corporate $ 28.8
Labor

Total $ 85.7
**Figures are in millions of dollars.
Additional information will be released in the spring after the final
Year-end reports for 1982 are filed and processed.
This item contains materials that cannot be 

uploaded to the federal docket. A CD containing 

files submitted to EPA with the extension .las is 

available by contacting docket staff via email at 

Docket_ORD@epamail.epa.gov
§ 15.825 Engineers. ( a ) An individual in charge of an engineering watch on a mechanically propelled, seagoing, documented vessel of 200 GRT or more, other than an individual described in § 15.820 of this subpart, must hold an appropriately endorsed license or MMC authorizing service as an assistant engineer.
( b ) On vessels subject to STCW, the individual meeting the requirement of this section must also hold an STCW endorsement as officer in charge of an engineering watch with the appropriate propulsion power for the vessel upon which he or she is operating, except as noted in § 15.105(g) of this part for vessels on domestic near-coastal voyages.
( c ) An offshore supply vessel of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) as defined in § 125.160 of this chapter, for which the Coast Guard has accepted the use of automated systems to replace specific personnel pursuant to subpart 62.50 of this chapter, must carry at least one credentialed assistant engineer, in addition to the individual described in § 15.820 of this subpart.
( d ) The OCMI determines the minimum number of credentialed engineers required for the safe operation of inspected vessels.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78008, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48924, Aug. 18, 2014]
§ 131.845 Instructions for shift of steering gear. ( a ) Instructions, including diagrams, for a shift of steering gear and for a shift to the alternative steering stations must be on water-resistant material and posted at each steering station and in the steering-engine room, relating, in order, the different steps to take in either shift.
( b ) The instructions must indicate each clutch or pin to be “in” or “out” and each valve or switch to be “open” or “closed” in a shift to any means of steering for which the vessel is equipped.
( c ) The instructions must specify that each steering wheel or lever, and each rudder, must be amidships before any shift of steering gear or steering stations.
( d ) Each clutch, gear, wheel, lever, valve, or switch used during any shift of steering gear or steering stations must be numbered or lettered on a metal plate or painted so that the numbers or letters are recognizable at a reasonable distance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6695
In Re: CARL E. LOCKHART, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-152-5) Submitted: July 12, 2002 Decided: July 22, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl E. Lockhart, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carl E. Lockhart petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, asserting the district court has unreasonably delayed action on his petition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances, and Lockhart’s petition does not establish extraordinary circumstances warranting mandamus relief. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Moreover, our review of the district court docket sheet discloses that there has been significant action in this case in the past six months and therefore, there has been no undue delay in the consideration of Lockhart’s petition. Accordingly, we deny Lockhart’s petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.219 Access to double bottom tanks serving as dedicated ballast tanks. ( a ) Except as prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section, access openings to double bottom tanks serving as dedicated ballast tanks must not be located within a cargo containment system.
( b ) Each access opening to a double bottom tank that is a dedicated ballast tank and that is located within a cargo containment system must be: ( 1 ) Enclosed in an access trunk extending to the weatherdeck;
( 2 ) Separated from the cargo containment system by two manhole coverings; or
( 3 ) Approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21207, May 17, 1982, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
UNITED ST ATES ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

J acynthia Bristol, Library Assistant 

La Sal Library 

8 93 Utah46 

La Sal, UT 84530 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the La Sal Library for public inspection 

Dear Ms. Bristol: 

The purpose of this letter is to request that the La Sal Library retain the enclosed package at the 

library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. The package consists of documents 

related to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's final decision on the Clean Air 

Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration amendment pennit for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil 

Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation near the city of Aneth, San Juan 

County, Utah. 

We would greatly appreciate your assistance for making these documents available to the general 

public. Please contact me at (4 15 ) 947-4156 or r9 airpennits@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Environmental Engineer 

Pennits Office, Air Division
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: May 13, 2005 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                    
|                   |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                        
|                   |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                              10,285
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    16,163
<PP&E>                                           1,021,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,038,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               82,849
<BONDS>                                            461,786
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            17,900
<OTHER-SE>                                         475,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,038,104
<SALES>                                             54,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    54,366
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      155,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    73,471
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (187,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (187,513)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (187,513)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Scope andmyths of Roe v. Wade : hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution ofthe Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred NinthCongress, second session, March 2, 2006**** 
SuDocNumber:Y4.J 89/1:109-84
ItemNumber:1020-A(online), 1020-B (online)
CGPsystem Number:000588651
 
Vol.1
Vol.2
 **
Source: Protocol Gas Order Summary – 1/28/10 From Scottt Shanklin to John Schakenbach

Location State Quoted - 2010 Cost/Cylinder *

Durham NC $375

Maumee ** OH $375

Woodland TX $375

Salem NH $375

LaPorte TX $400

Plumsteadville ** PA $400

Longmont CO $400

Troy MI $400

Apoke FL $269

Twinsburg OH $340

Bethlehem PA $435

Long Beach CA $435

Shreveport LA $475

Riverside CA $660

Auburn ME $450

Long Beach CA $403

Toledo OH $225

West Branch NJ $665

Morrisville PA $397

Columbus OH $400

* Cost quoted by gas vendor for 3-component plus balance gas cylinder when the order was placed; does not include shipping cost

** During call to vendor, revealed that this particular plant was closed, production moved to another close facility
- 2293
- 2294
- 2295