alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Commission on 21st Century Education in 
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting of the National Science Board Commission on 21st 
Century Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics:
    Date and Time: The meeting will take place at 8 a.m. on January 18, 
2007. Please see http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/edu_com/ for schedule updates.
    Place: The meeting will be held in at the Arizona State Capitol, 
1700 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007. Check with the 
information desk in the lobby of the Capitol for the meeting room.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Elizabeth Strickland, Commission Executive 
Secretary, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230; Phone: 703-292-4527, E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89ecfafdfbe0eae2e5c9e7faefa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f2a3c3b3d262c24230f213c2961282039">[email protected]</span></a>
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Commission to discuss its draft recommendations relating to K-12 STEM 
education. A provisional agena for the meeting will be available at 
http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/edu_com/ on January 4, 2007.
    Topics to be Discussed: K-Science, Technology, Engineering, and 
Mathematics Education; recommendations of the Commission.
    Public Comment: Written comments to the Commission may be submitted 
by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c38d908186a780acae83adb0a5eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e504d5c5b7a5d71735e706d7830797168">[email protected]</span></a>. Those wishing to make brief public 
comments during the meeting may register to do so either by signing up 
at the information table on the day of the meeting or in advance by 
sending an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a5449585f7e5975775a74697c347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d435e4f48694e62604d637e6b236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 21, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-9900 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-49 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20667 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

CASEY ALLEN MCBRIDE, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On December 11, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a 

plea hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on that 

same day, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 17) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: January 28, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:14-cr-20667-TLL-PTM Doc # 20 Filed 01/28/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 98
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on January 28, 2015. 

 s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

 TRACY A. JACOBS 

1:14-cr-20667-TLL-PTM Doc # 20 Filed 01/28/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 99
- 1789
- 1790
|21stCentury Holding Company
|---------------------------



|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the
  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21stCentury Holding Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard A. Widdicombe,
  Chief Executive Officer of 21stCentury Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of 21st Century Holding
      Company.
|

|By:/s/
      Richard A. Widdicombe
      Richard
      A. Widdicombe, Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 

|35
|--

>
#### § 125.190 Right of appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal from the decision or action in compliance with subpart 1.03 of this chapter.
Order entered September 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00859-CR

DERIC EUGENE MADISON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-76000-U

ORDER

The Court DENIES court reporter Cheryl Dixon’s September 11, 2015 request for an 

extension of time until September 18, 2015 to file the reporter’s record. Ms. Dixon did not file 

the reporter’s record by September 18, 2015.

We ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has 

been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other 

reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 
trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2094 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2094

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the per 
 resident payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments 
                      under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2009

   Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Moran of Kansas, and Mr. Young of 
   Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the per 
 resident payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments 
                      under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physician Training Promotion Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING TO 100 PERCENT OF THE LOCALITY ADJUSTED NATIONAL 
              AVERAGE PER RESIDENT AMOUNT THE PAYMENT FLOOR FOR DIRECT 
              GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PAYMENTS UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1886(h)(2)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(h)(2)(D)(iii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' after ``70 percent,''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``85 percent,'' the following: ``for 
        the cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 2009 
        shall not be less than 90 percent, for the cost reporting 
        period beginning during fiscal year 2010 shall not be less than 
        95 percent, and for the cost reporting period beginning during 
        fiscal year 2011 shall not be less than 100 percent,''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Rajneesh Vig, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Erik L. Cuellar, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: February 24, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Rajneesh Vig                                  |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Rajneesh Vig                                           |
|                    |   |   | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

| Date: February 24, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Erik L. Cuellar                               |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Erik L. Cuellar                                        |
|                    |   |   | Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. and will be retained by BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# - · ·

In The Matter Of: 

## SERVED: November 19, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC



## - 4 .!
Docket No. FAA-2013-0715 · AIRPORT MAILERS , INC. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2012S0700256 Respondent
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE On September 25 , 2013, an Order Setting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference and Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. On November 19, 2013 , the parties appeared by telephone for a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and discussed the status ofthe case and their calendar availability. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13
.205(a)(l) , (6) and (7) , Civ. R. 16, 14 C.F
.R. §13
.217 , and 14 C.F.R. § 13
.220, and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulation, statutory authority, and being fully advised;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties require additional time to complete possible settlement negotiations. A continuance ofthe Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference is granted. 2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference is continued to December 17,2013 (10:30am-11:30am ET) . At that time, various discovery and litigation deadlines will be discussed and set (e.g. , initial discovery, general discovery, supplemental discovery, exchange ofwitness lists and exhibits, hearing dates, etc.). 3. The parties ' jointly proposed scheduling/discovery shall be filed on or before December 10,2013. 4. For clarifications ofthis order or questions with regard to the procedures to be followed in this case, please contact Mr. Cody L. Smith, Attorney-Advisor, at the Office of Hearings (202-366-6941).

Attachment: Service List

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY



### Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 1



### Mr. James H. Dunfee, Jr. Complainant ' s Counsel ONE COPY



### Office ofRegional Counsel, Southern Region,

AS0-7 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Ms. Heather Lowry Respondent ' s Lay Representative President Airport Mailers, Inc., 13420 Reese Blvd. W. Huntersville, NC 28078 TEL: none
Judge J.E. Sullivan US. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0715 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U
.S
. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591 , Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430
.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40121

Summary Calendar

OSSIE ROBERT TRADER

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CV-545

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ossie Robert Trader, federal prisoner # 32019-066, was convicted of armed

bank robbery and using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, and

he was sentenced to serve 248 months in prison. He filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

habeas corpus petition to challenge his convictions and to raise a claim related

to his fine, and he now appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 2241

petition. Trader argues that his Speedy Trial rights were violated pursuant to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 17, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40121

2

the principles set forth in Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006), and that

his fine is invalid. 

Trader has not shown that the district court erred by concluding that his

Speedy Trial claim, which arises from events that occurred prior to sentencing,

was not cognizable in a § 2241 proceeding. See Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention

Ctr., 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990). He likewise has not shown that he

should be permitted to proceed under the savings clause of § 2255, as he has not

shown that his Speedy Trial claim is based on a retroactively applicable case or

that he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. See Reyes-Requena v. United

States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Finally, he has not shown that the

district court erred by concluding thatitlacked jurisdiction to consider his claim

challenging his fine because this claim did not satisfy the in custody requirement

of § 2241. See § 2241(c); United States v. Hatten, 167 F.3d 884, 885 (5th

Cir.1999); United States v. Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1137-38 (5th Cir.1994). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 122.502 Crew and passenger list. ( a ) The owner, charterer, managing operator, or master of the following vessels must keep a correct list of the names of all persons that embark on and disembark from the vessel: ( 1 ) A vessel making a coastwise or oceans voyage where: ( i ) Passengers embark or disembark from the vessel to another vessel or port other than at the port of origin; or
( ii ) Passengers are carried overnight;
( 2 ) A vessel making a voyage of more than 300 miles on the Great Lakes, except from a Canadian to a United States port; and
( 3 ) A vessel arriving from a foreign port, except at a United States Great Lakes port from a Canadian Great Lakes port.
( b ) The master of a vessel required to prepare a crew and passenger list by paragraph (a) of this section shall see that the list is prepared prior to departing on a voyage. The list must be communicated verbally or in writing ashore at the vessel's normal berthing location or with a representative of the owner or managing operator of the vessel. The crew and passenger list shall be available to the Coast Guard upon request.
§ 140.410 Safety orientation. ( a ) Personnel must meet the requirements in §§ 15.405 and 15.1105 of this chapter, as appropriate.
( b ) Prior to getting underway for the first time on a particular towing vessel, each crewmember must receive a safety orientation on: ( 1 ) His or her duties in an emergency;
( 2 ) The location, operation, and use of lifesaving equipment;
( 3 ) Prevention of falls overboard;
( 4 ) Personal safety measures;
( 5 ) The location, operation, and use of Personal Protective Equipment;
( 6 ) Emergency egress procedures;
( 7 ) The use and operation of watertight and weathertight closures;
( 8 ) Responsibilities to provide assistance to individuals that are not crewmembers;
( 9 ) How to respond to emergencies relative to the tow; and
( 10 ) Awareness of, and expected response to, any other hazards inherent to the operation of the towing vessel which may pose a threat to life, property, or the environment.
( c ) The safety orientation provided to crewmembers who received a safety orientation on another vessel may be modified to cover only those areas unique to the other vessel on which service will occur.
( d ) Safety orientations and other crew training must be documented in the TVR, official logbook, or in accordance with the TSMS applicable to the vessel. The entry must include: ( 1 ) The date of the safety orientation or training;
( 2 ) A general description of the safety orientation or training topics;
( 3 ) The name(s) and signature(s) of individual(s) providing the orientation or training; and
( 4 ) The name(s) of the individual(s) receiving the safety orientation or training.