# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 37 4

. CHARLES B O Y D et a l

. v

. AMERI CAN HOMES 4 RENT

PROPERTI ES TW O, LLC.

Ch arl es an d St effan i Bo y d

, t h ro u gh at t o rn ey Grad y Ro b ert s , s eek d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o f t h e s u p eri o r co u rt ’ s d eci s i o n in t h i s d is po s ses s o r y p ro ceed i n g

. 1 Th e

a p p l i cat i on p u rp o rt s t o ch al l en g e t h e s u peri or co u rt ’ s M arch 1 2

, 2 01 5

, o ral o r d e r

g ran t i n g a wri t o f p o s s es s i o n to t h e o p p os i n g p art y

. H owev er, o ral ru l in g s are n ot

s u b ject t o ap p el l at e rev i ew. See Ti t el m a n v. S t ed ma n , 27 7 Ga. 4 6 0 (5 9 1 SE2 d 7 7 4 )

(2 0 0 3) (a co u rt ’ s ru l i n g i s n o t s u b ject t o ap pel l at e rev i ew u n t i l i t is red uced t o wri t i n g,

s i gn ed b y t h e ju dg e, an d fi l ed b y

t h e cl erk ).

M o reo v er, we h av e al read y reject ed t h e Bo y d s ’ at t em p t t o o b t ai n d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew of t he wri t o f p o s s es s i o n i n t h i s p ro ceed in g

. See Cas e No

. A1 5 D 0 0 63 (d en i ed

o n Oct o b er 20

, 2 0 1 4). 2 Acco rd i n g l y , u n d er th e do ct ri n e o f r e s j u d i c at a, we l ack

ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n si d er t h e Bo y d s ’ l at es t ch al l en g e t o th is ru l i n g

. See S t i r l i n g v.

S t a t e , 19 9 Ga. Ap p. 8 7 7 (4 0 6 SE2 d 28 2 ) (1 9 9 1 ) (“ It i s ax i o m at i c th at th e s am e i s s u e

can n ot b e rel i t i g at ed a d i n f i ni tu m .”). Fo r t h es e reas o n s , t h e ap pl i cat io n is h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Pu rs uan t t o Co u rt of Ap p eal s Ru l e 1 5

, t h i s Co urt m ay p e n a l i z e a p art y o r an

1 Th e ap p l i cat i on was fi l ed i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

, w h i ch tran s ferred t h e m at t er h ere.

2 In a rel at ed ap p l i cat i o n , we d en ied t h e Bo y d s ’ req u es t fo r ap p el l at e rev i ew o f

t h e s u p eri o r co u rt ’ s d i sm i s s al of t h ei r n o t i ce o f ap p e a l f r o m t h e re-en t ered wri t o f

p o s s es s i o n . See Cas e No . A1 5 D0 2 3 2 (d en i ed o n Feb ru ary 1 7, 2 0 1 5 ). May 15, 2015at t o rn ey fo r fi l i n g an ap p l i cat io n fo r d is cret i o na ry ap p eal t h at i s d et erm i n ed t o b e

fri v ol o u s

. Becau s e we h av e al read y reject ed t h e Bo y d s’ req u es t fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o f t h e w ri t o f p o s s es s i o n i n t h is cas e, t h i s a p p l i cat i o n i s fri v o l o u s

. Acco rd in g ly

, we h ereb y fi n e Grad y Ro b ert s $ 5 00 fo r fi l i n g th e ap p l i cat i o n

. Th i s

p en al t y i s i m

p o s ed ag ai n s t at t o rn ey Grad y Ro b ert s, n o t ag ai n st ap p lic a n t s Ch arl es an d

St effan i Bo y d

. In acco rd an ce w i t h t h e pro v i s i o n s d es cri bed i n Ru l e 1 5 (c), t h e t ri al

co u rt i s D I R E C T E D t o en ter t h i s j u d gm en t in fav o r o f Am eri can Ho m es 4 Ren t

Pro p ert i es Two

, LLC, an d ag ai n s t at t o rn ey G rad y Ro b ert s an d h i s fi rm , Ro b ert s Law,

LLC.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/15/2015