alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Lazzarato, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                 |  | By: | /s/DAVID LAZZARATOName: David Lazzarato
Title: Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 11, 2005.

---



QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 26, 2020

No. 04-19-00359-CR

Laura Flores MESSICK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR11174

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellant was convicted of murder, and the trial court appointed appellate counsel. On

appeal, appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, and Appellant filed a pro se brief in response.

We issued a memorandum opinion on July 29, 2020, affirming Appellant’s conviction. On

August 28, 2020, Appellant filed a subsequent brief with this court, which was addressed in the

caption to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Based on the record and Appellant’s pro se filing, it is

unclear what her intent was.

We construe Appellant’s August 28, 2020 filing as a motion for rehearing. However, a

motion for rehearing was due on August 13, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Appellant did not

file a motion for extension of time, and we cannot imply one. See id. R. 49.8; Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Furthermore, our plenary power over the judgment

expired on September 27, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 19.1(a). Accordingly, we DENY

Appellant’s August 28, 2020 motion for rehearing as untimely.

If Appellant desires to file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals, Appellant must comply with Rule 68 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See id. R. 68. The petition should be addressed to Clerk of the Court of Criminal

Appeals, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2014-2015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearing of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Criminal Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules 
of Criminal Procedure, scheduled for February 2, in San Francisco, 
California, has been canceled. [Original notice of hearing appeared in 
the Federal Register of October 2, 2006].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.


[[Page 2015]]


    Dated: January 9, 2007.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 07-125 Filed 1-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
J.

tf0 7, of some of the actuarial assessments, the record supports the district court's implicit conclusion that the evaluator's opinion was based on "currently accepted standards of assessment." NRS 176A.110(1)(a); 

### see Blackburn, 129 Nev. at , 294 P.3d at 426-27. Accordingly, we conclude , 294 P.3d that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see id. at at 427, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.



# z_t. -ci9-1 Douglas Saitta cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2162 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 123 11th Avenue South in Nampa, Idaho, 

as the ‘‘Herbert A Littleton Postal Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 2162 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. HERBERT A LITTLETON POSTAL STATION. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 123 11th Avenue South in 

4 Nampa, Idaho, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Herbert A Littleton Postal Station’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Herbert A Littleton 

10 Postal Station’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent
B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Trent B. Troyer
----------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 28, 2005


                                       27
# Senate Floor Activity - Wednesday, April 10, 2024

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Wednesday, April 10)

 H.J.Res. 98

122

 H.Con.Res. 85

 S. 2051

 S. 4072

 S.J.Res. 61

121

 S.Res. 634

 S.Res. 635

 S.Res. 636

## Executive Business (Wednesday, April 10)

 PN1290

120

## Recess

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUPERIOR SERVICES,  INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS  ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         30,417
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (823)
<INVENTORY>                                    770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,334
<PP&E>                                         200,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (83,042)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,254
<BONDS>                                        16,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       258
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,192
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               81,689
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               746
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .29
        

</TABLE>
Hillsborough,

No. 5434.

#### Everett Belanger *v.*Emile R. Bussiere, *County Attorney.*

Argued January 5, 1966.

Decided April 7, 1966.

*158
      *Clifford J. Ross*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*William Maynard,*Attorney General and *George S. Pappagianis,*Deputy Attorney General *(Mr. Pappagianis*orally), and *Emile R. Bussiere,*county attorney, pro se, for the defendant.

Kenison, C.J.

The defendant contends that under the discretionary provisions of RSA 173:3 II (1) he, and he alone, has the authority to determine whether the plaintiff shall be examined as a sexual psychopath. The statute has been so construed in the ordinary case. *In re Moulton,*96 N. H. 370; *In re Craft,*99 N. H. 287. *Cf. In re Mason,*101 N. H. 335; RSA 173:4-a. It is clear that the statute does not permit the alleged sexual psychopath to originate such a petition. Swanson, Sexual Psychopath Statutes: Summary and Analysis, 51 J. Crim. L., C. & P. S. 215, 216, 228-235 (column 4) (1960). This would mean that if a person was without doubt a sexual psychopath, the “remedial, therapeutic and preventive” objective of the statute would be unavailable to the person most needing it in any case that a county attorney refuses to file a petition under RSA 173:3 II (1). *In re Moulton,*96 N. H. 370, 373; 24 A.L.R. 2d 350. Considering that the determinatión of whether a person is a sexual psychopath is one that “is based primarily on medical evidence” *(In re Miller,*98 N. H. 107, 108), it is reasonable to expect that State prosecuting officials will be guided in part by their own State experts. See *In re Craft,*99 N. H. 287, 288; RSA 173:4-a.

In the present case no one questions the good faith of the county attorney and his position finds support in general language of the statute. However in no previous case do we find such a strong recommendation that a person be examined under the provisions *159of RSA ch. 173. While this recommendation is not required to be accepted by a court or a county attorney *(In re Farnsworth,*99 N. H. 396), in some cases the interests of justice may require a re-examination of the matter. Rubin, The Law of Criminal Correction 530 (1963). In the present case it appears that the purposes of RSA 173:1 “to protect society,” the rights of the plaintiff, and the interest of the State will be served if the question of an inquiry and medical examination (RSA 173:3, 4) is reconsidered. The case is remanded for that purpose.

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
You are here: EPA Home Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emissions Factors Emission Inventories 

# Emission Inventories Inventory News May 2015: 2015 Emissions Inventory Conference - Air Quality Challenges: Tackling the Changing Face of Emissions final program, papers, presentations and training are now available. March 2015: 2011 NEI Version 2 is now available. March 2015: Air Emissions Reporting Rule is now published  2011 NEI Data  2008 NEI Data  2005 NEI Data  2002 NEI Data  Earlier Year

Summaries  NEI Emission Trends Data  Canada  Mexico Emission InventoryData

 EIS User's Manual  Submitting XML Data to EIS  EIS Gateway  EIS Training  Exchange NetworkWeb Client Emission Inventory System

 2014 NEI Documentation  2011 NEI Documentation  2008 NEI Documentation  2005 NEI Documentation  2002 NEI Documentation  1999 NEI Documentation Plans and Documentation

 Emission Inventory Improvement Program  NEI User's Group Listserv  Emission Inventory Training  Software and Tools Emission Inventory Resources

 2011 NEI Report  2008 NEI Report  2002 NEI Booklet  Air Emission Sources (Maps & Charts) Data Analysis  EIS Code Tables (including SCCs) (MDB, 5.93 MB)  PM Calculator  Facility/Point Bridge Tool (ACCDB, 5.55MB)  Nonpoint/Onroad/Nonroad Bridge Tool (ACCDB, 3.14MB)  EventBridge Tool (ACCDB, 2.48MB) Emission InventoryTools

 Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR)  Guidance forImplementation of Ozone/PM NAAQS/Regional Haze Regulations  Emissions Statement Requirements Under 8 - Hour Ozone NAAQS Implementation (PDF12K) March 14, 2006 Regulations and Guidance  AIR Data Web site  Annual Air Quality Trends Report  National - Scale AirToxics Assessment (NATA)  Greenhouse Gas Emissions  PM2.5 Emission Inventory Resource Center Related InventoryLinks

 Emissions Modeling Clearinghouse  Emissions Modeling Software Emission Modeling Resources 

## Technology Transfer Network

Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emissions Factors http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiinformation.html Lastupdated on Thursday, September 10, 2015 

### Page 1 of 1 Emission Inventories | Clearinghouse for Emission Inventories and Emissions Factors | Te

...

10/29/2015 http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiinformation.html
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 204 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 204

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of Mendocino, 
 Humboldt, and Del Norte Counties in the State of California, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

  Mr. Thompson of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of Mendocino, 
 Humboldt, and Del Norte Counties in the State of California, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern California Ocean and 
Coastal Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act or any other law and except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, the 
        conduct of oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related 
        activities is prohibited in areas of the outer Continental 
        Shelf located off the coast of Mendocino, Humboldt, and Del 
        Norte Counties in the State of California.
            ``(2) Effect.--Nothing in this subsection affects any 
        rights under leases issued under this Act before the date of 
        enactment of this subsection.''.

SEC. 3. COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OIL AND 
              NATURAL GAS RESOURCES.

    Section 357(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
15912(a)) is amended by inserting after ``Continental Shelf'' the 
following: ``(other than the areas of the Outer Continental Shelf off 
the coast of Mendocino, Humboldt and Del Norte Counties in the State of 
California)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 98.90 Monitoring. ( a ) The Secretary will monitor programs funded under the CCDF for compliance with: ( 1 ) The Act;
( 2 ) The provisions of this part; and
( 3 ) The provisions and requirements set forth in the CCDF Plan approved under § 98.18;
( b ) If a review or investigation reveals evidence that the Lead Agency, or an entity providing services under contract or agreement with the Lead Agency, has failed to substantially comply with the Plan or with one or more provisions of the Act or implementing regulations, the Secretary will issue a preliminary notice to the Lead Agency of possible non-compliance. The Secretary shall consider comments received from the Lead Agency within 60 days (or such longer period as may be agreed upon between the Lead Agency and the Secretary).
( c ) Pursuant to an investigation conducted under paragraph (a) of this section, a Lead Agency shall make appropriate books, documents, papers, manuals, instructions, and records available to the Secretary, or any duly authorized representatives, for examination or copying on or off the premises of the appropriate entity, including subgrantees and contractors, upon reasonable request.
( d ) ( 1 ) Lead Agencies and subgrantees shall retain all CCDF records, as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, and any other records of Lead Agencies and subgrantees that are needed to substantiate compliance with CCDF requirements, for the period of time specified in paragraph (e) of this section.
( 2 ) Lead Agencies and subgrantees shall provide through an appropriate provision in their contracts that their contractors will retain and permit access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the contractor that are directly pertinent to that specific contract.
( e ) *Length of retention period.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, records specified in paragraph (c) of this section shall be retained for three years from the day the Lead Agency or subgrantee submits the Financial Reports required by the Secretary, pursuant to § 98.65(g), for the program period.
( 2 ) If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit, disallowance action, or other action involving the records has been started before the expiration of the three-year retention period, the records shall be retained until completion of the action and resolution of all issues that arise from it, or until the end of the regular three-year period, whichever is later.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15659-15664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

ACTION: Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 252. This 
bulletin listed revision in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. 
Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United 
States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. 
Bulletin Number 252 is being published in the Federal Register to 
assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin 
Number 251. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the 
Federal Register now constitute the only notification of revisions in 
per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of 
Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please 
contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:

    Dated: March 26, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 15660]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02AP07.000


[[Page 15661]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02AP07.001


[[Page 15662]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02AP07.002


[[Page 15663]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02AP07.003


[[Page 15664]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02AP07.004

[FR Doc. 07-1599 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.201 Openings to accommodation, service or control spaces. ( a ) Except as allowed in paragraph (b) of this section, entrances, ventilation intakes and exhausts, and other openings to accommodation, service, or control spaces must be located aft of the house bulkhead facing the cargo area a distance at least equal to the following: ( 1 ) 3 m (approx. 10 ft) if the vessel length is less than 75 meters (approx. 246 ft).
( 2 ) L/25 if the vessel length is between 75 and 125 meters (approx. 246 ft and 410 ft).
( 3 ) 5 m (approx. 16.5 ft) if the vessel length is more than 125 meters (approx. 410 ft).
( b ) Fixed port lights, wheelhouse doors, and windows need not meet the location requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section if they do not leak when tested with a fire hose at 207 kPa gauge (30 psig).
[CGD 81-078, 50 FR 21173, May 22, 1985]
- 3359
- 3360
- 3361
- 3362
- 3363
- 3364
- 3365
- 3366
- 3367
- 3368
- 3369
- 3370
- 3371
- 3372
- 3373