Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 20, 2007 / Notices 13085 

1Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse 

and the President, through Executive Order 13222 

of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), 

as extended by the Notice of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 

44551, Aug. 7, 2006), has continued the Regulations 

in effect under the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706(2000)) 

(‘‘IEEPA’’). 

2The Regulations are currently codified at 15 CFR 

Parts 730–774 (2006). 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

III. After notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to MI by affiliation, 

ownership, control, or position of 

responsibility in the conduct of trade or 

related services may also be made 

subject to the provisions of this Order. 

IV. This Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin 

technology. 

V. This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect until 

November 18, 2015. 

VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the 

Regulations, MI may file an appeal of 

this Order with the Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

VII. A copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to MI. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Dated: March 12, 2007. 

Eileen M. Albanese, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 07–1334 Filed 3–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges; 

Maurice Subilia 

In the Matter of: Maurice Subilia, 17 

Oakwood Road, Kennebunkport, ME 

04046; Respondent; Order Denying 

Export Privileges 

A. Denial of Export Privileges of 

Maurice Subilia 

On November 18, 2005, in the U.S. 

District Court in the District of 

Massachusetts, Maurice Subilia 

(‘‘Subilia’’) was convicted of violating 

the Export Administration Act of 1979, 

as amended (currently codified at 50 

U.S.C. app. 2401–2420 (2000)) (the 

‘‘Act’’) 1. Specifically, Subilia was 

convicted of knowingly exporting and 

causing to be exported from the United 

States to India, a controlled commodity, 

to wit, a component, accessory and 

controls for an isostatic press, that is, a 

control panel which consisted of, among 

other things, an operating control 

cabinet, a power/pressure control 

cabinet, and digital controllers and 

recorder, without having first obtained 

the required export license from the 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

In addition to the violation of the Act, 

the Subilia was convicted of conspiring 

to violate the Act in violation of 18 

U.S.C. 371(2000) and aiding and 

abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 

(2000). Subilia was ordered to serve six 

months community confinement, and 

one year home confinement followed by 

one and one half years probation, as 

well as a $250,000 fine. 

Section 11(h) of the Act and Section 

766.25 of the Export Administration 

Regulations (‘‘Regulations’’) 2 provide, 

in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of * * * Act, ’’

for a period not to exceed 10 years from 

the date of conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(a) 

and (b). In addition, Section 750.8 of the 

Regulations states that BIS’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any BIS 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

his conviction. 

I have received notice of the Subilia’s 

conviction for violating the Act, and I, 

following consultations with the Export 

Enforcement, including the Director, 

Office of Export Enforcement, have 

decided to deny the Subilia’s export 

privileges under the Regulations for a 

period of 10 years from the date of his 

conviction. Due to exceptional 

circumstances, this Order is being 

issued without prior notice or 

opportunity to respond. 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

Ordered 

I. Until November 18, 2015, Maurice 

Subilia, 17 Oakwood Road, 

Kennebunkport, ME 04046, his 

successors or assigns, and when acting 

for or on behalf of Subilia, his officers, 

representatives, agents, or employees 

(‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly or 

indirectly, participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including, 

but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

to or to be exported from the United 

States that is subject to the Regulations, 

or in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

II. No person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
13086 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 20, 2007 / Notices 

1The Nucor Corporation, a domestic interested 

party, did not submit a case brief or a rebuttal brief. 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

III. After notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Subilia by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of this 

Order. 

IV. This Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin 

technology. 

V. This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect until 

November 18, 2015. 

VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the 

Regulations, Subilia may file an appeal 

of this Order with the Under Secretary 

of Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

VII. A copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Subilia. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Dated: March 12, 2007. 

Eileen M. Albanese, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 07–1333 Filed 3–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–816] 

Notice of Final Results of the Twelfth 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from the Republic of Korea 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 11, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review for certain 

corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat 

products (CORE) from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea). See Certain Corrosion–

Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products 

from Korea: Notice of Preliminary 

Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 53370 (September 11, 

2006) (Preliminary Results). This review 

covers four manufacturers/exporters of 

the subject merchandise: Union Steel 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Union); 

Pohang Iron & Steel Company, Ltd. 

(POSCO) and Pohang Coated Steel Co., 

Ltd. (POCOS) (collectively, the POSCO 

Group); Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO); and 

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongbu) 

(collectively, respondents). The period 

of review (POR) is August 1, 2004, 

through July 31, 2005. 

As a result of our analysis of the 

comments received, these final results 

differ from the preliminary results. For 

our final results, we have found that 

during the POR, Union and Dongbu sold 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV). We have also found that 

HYSCO and the POSCO Group did not 

make sales of the subject merchandise at 

less than NV (i.e., they have a zero or 

de minimis dumping margin). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 20, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska (Union), Preeti Tolani 

(Dongbu), Victoria Cho (the POSCO 

Group), and Joy Zhang (HYSCO), AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–8362, (202) 482–

0395, (202) 482–5075, and (202) 482–

1168, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 11, 2006, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Results. On January 3, 2007, the 

Department published the notice of 

extension of final results of the 

antidumping administrative review of 

CORE from Korea, extending the date 

for these final results to March 12, 2007. 

See Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel 

Flat Products from Korea: Extension of 

Time Limits for the Final Results of 

Antidumping Administrative Review, 72 

FR 102 (January 3, 2007). 

Comments from Interested Parties 

We invited parties to comment on our 

Preliminary Results. On October 20, 

2006, Mittal Steel USA ISG, Inc. (Mittal) 

and United States Steel Corporation (US 

Steel) filed case briefs concerning all 

respondents and all respondents filed a 

case brief.1 On October 31, 2006, Mittal 

filed a rebuttal brief concerning all 

respondents and U.S. Steel filed rebuttal 

briefs concerning Union, Dongbu, and 

POSCO. On October 31, 2006, all 

respondents filed a rebuttal brief. 

Scope of the Order 

This order covers cold–rolled (cold–

reduced) carbon steel flat–rolled carbon 

steel products, of rectangular shape, 

either clad, plated, or coated with 

corrosion–resistant metals such as zinc, 

aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelor iron–based alloys, whether or not 

corrugated or painted, varnished or 

coated with plastics or other 

nonmetallic substances in addition to 

the metallic coating, in coils (whether or 

not in successively superimposed 

layers) and of a width of 0.5 inch or 

greater, or in straight lengths which, if 

of a thickness less than 4.75 millimeters, 

are of a width of 0.5 inch or greater and 

which measures at least 10 times the 

thickness or if of a thickness of 4.75 

millimeters or more are of a width 

which exceeds 150 millimeters and 

measures at least twice the thickness, as 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item numbers 

7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 

7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 

7210.49.0090, 7210.61.0000, 

7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 

7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 

7210.90.1000, 7210.90.6000, 

7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 

7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 

7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 

7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 

7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 

7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 

7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 

7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 

7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES