### 62354 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 202 / Friday, October 18, 2013 / Notices

question may be clarified as to how to categorize such transactions.

Section II: Debit Card Transactions

Small issuer exemption: Transactions using card of exempt vs. non-exempt issuers—The Board proposes to revise this section by deleting line item 1e.1 (Volume and Value), All settled purchase transactions between (January 1, 2011–September 30, 2011), as this timeframe is no longer relevant. Subsequent line items 1e.2 and 1e.3 would be renumbered as 1e.1 and 1e.2.

Transactions using card of exempt vs. non-exempt issuers (January 1, 2011– September 30, 2011)—The Board proposes to revise this section by deleting line items 1f through 1f.2 as this timeframe is no longer relevant. Subsequent line items would be renumbered accordingly.

General-use prepaid card exemption: Exempt vs. non-exempt general-useprepaid card transactions and Generaluse prepaid card exemption:Interchange fees on exempt vs. nonexempt card transactions—The Board proposes to revise line items 1g and 2i by requiring networks to allocate volume, value, and interchange fee revenue for exempt general-use prepaid card transactions between transactions using prepaid cards issued by exempt (small) issuers (adding line items 1g.1.1 and 2i.1.1) and transactions using prepaid cards issued by non-exempt issuers (adding line items 1g.1.2 and 2i.1.2). Currently, payment card networks are required to allocate volume and value of general-use prepaid card transactions, and associated interchange fee revenue, between exempt and non-exempt general-use prepaid card transactions and interchange fees. Under Regulation II, a general-use prepaid card transaction may be exempt from the interchange fee standards either because the card is issued by an issuer that qualifies for the small issuer exemption or because the card qualifies for the prepaid card exemption, irrespective of the size of the issuer. The proposed break-out of these data would allow the Board to determine which type of exemption applies to each exempt transaction, thus improving interpretation of these data.

Small issuer exemption: Interchange fees on transactions using card of exempt vs. non-exempt issuers—The Board proposes to revise this section by deleting line items 2g.1, All interchange fees paid to issuers between (January 1, 2011–September 30, 2011), and 2g.3, Interchange fees paid to non-exempt issuers between (October 1, 2011– December 31, 2011), as these timeframes are no longer relevant. Subsequent line item 2g.2 would be renumbered as 2g.1.

Interchange fees on transactions using card of exempt vs. non-exempt issuers (January 1, 2011–September 30, 2011)— The Board proposes to revise this section by deleting line items 2h through 2h.2 as this timeframe is no longer relevant. Subsequent line items would be renumbered accordingly.

Small issuer exemption: Network fees received from exempt vs. non-exempt issuers—The Board proposes to revise this section by deleting line items 3c.1,
All network fees received from issuers that settled between January 1, 2011– September 30, 2011, and line items 3d through 3d.2, as these timeframes are no longer relevant. Subsequent line items
would be renumbered 3c.1 and 3c.2.

Small issuer exemption: Paymentsand incentives paid to exempt vs. nonexempt issuers—The Board proposes to revise this section by deleting line items 4c.1, All payments and incentives paid to issuers between January 1, 2011– September 30, 2011, and line items 4d through 4d.2, as these timeframes are no longer relevant. Subsequent line items
would be renumbered 4c.1 and 4c.2.

General Instructions

Response Confidentiality and Burden—The Board proposes to revise the confidentiality statement to indicate that the Board may release some information identified by network, rather than in the aggregate, by total, or as an average. The Board currently publishes this information only at the aggregate levels across networks for signature, PIN, and total debit card transactions: The percent of total number of transactions for exempt and non-exempt issuers; the percent of total value of transactions for exempt and non-exempt issuers; and the averagetransaction value for exempt, nonexempt, and all issuers. This information can already be calculated at
the network level from the information the Board currently releases on average interchange fees. Network-specific information may be useful to issuers (both exempt and non-exempt) and merchants in choosing payment card networks in which to participate and to policymakers in assessing the effect of Regulation II on the level of interchange fees received by exempt and nonexempt issuers over time. The existing confidentiality statement provides that only the average interchange fees for exempt and non-exempt issuers would be released by network. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 15, 2013.
Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2013–24508 Filed 10–17–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6210–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 8501]**

**Culturally Significant Objects Imported**
**for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in**  **Ancient Times’’ Formerly Titled ‘‘The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in** 
**Biblical Times’’**

**ACTION :**  Notice, correction.

**SUMMARY :**  On October 12, 2011, notice was published on page 63341 of the Federal Register (volume 76, number 197) of determinations made by the Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ‘‘The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Biblical Times.’’ The referenced notice was corrected on October 19, 2012, by a notice published on pages 64373–64374 of the Federal Register (volume 77, number 203) to change the exhibition name to ‘‘The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Ancient Times’’ and to include additional objects as part of the exhibition. The October 19, 2012, notice referenced above was corrected on March 15, 2013, by a notice published on page 16565 of the Federal Register (volume 78, number 51) to include an additional object as part of the exhibition. The March 15, 2013, notice referenced above was corrected on April 25, 2013, by a notice published on page 24462 of the Federal Register (volume 78, number 80) to include additional objects in the exhibition. Today’s notice is being issued to include additional objects in the exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

seq. ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the additional objects to be included in the exhibition ‘‘The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Ancient Times,’’ imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The


### 62355 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 202 / Friday, October 18, 2013 / Notices

additional objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the additional exhibit objects at the Leonardo Museum, Salt Lake City, UT, from on or about November 23, 2013, until on or about April 27, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For further information, including a list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.

Dated: October 11, 2013. Evan M. Ryan, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2013–24510 Filed 10–17–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE** 

**[Public Notice 8502]**

**Culturally Significant Objects Imported**
**for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Ileana Sonnabend: Ambassador for the New’’** 

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

seq. ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition ‘‘Ileana Sonnabend: Ambassador for the New,’’ imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about December 21, 2013, until on or about April 21, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the
national interest. I have ordered that
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register

.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202–632–6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.

Dated: October 11, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2013–24509 Filed 10–17–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P**