alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Meeting; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southern Recreation Resource Advisory Committee will hold 
its first meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. The purpose of the meeting is to 
receive recommendations concerning recreation fee proposals on the 
George Washington & Jefferson National Forests, National Forests in 
Florida, National Forests in Alabama, National Forests in Mississippi, 
National Forest in North Carolina, Ozark-St. Francis National Forest 
Cherokee National Forest, and the Francis Marion & Sumter National 
Forest; and to discuss other items of interest related to the Federal 
Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004. A large part of this first 
meeting will be dedicated to committee orientation and organizational 
matters such as election of chair and crafting of by-laws. A final 
detailed agenda, with any additions/corrections to agenda topics, 
location, field trips and meeting times, will be sent to regional media 
sources at least 14 days before the meeting, and hard copies can also 
be mailed or sent via FAX. Individuals who need special assistance such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, or 
who wish a hard copy of each agenda, should contact Caroline Mitchell 
at PO Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902 no later than 10 days prior to 
each meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be hold April 9-11, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Embassy Suites Hotel, Atlanta, 
Georgia. Send written comments to Cheryl Chatham Designated Federal 
Official for the Southern Recreation RAC, US Forest Service, PO Box 
1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Chatham, Designated Federal 
Official, US Forest Service, PO Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902 or 
Caroline Mitchell, Committee Coordinator, US Forest Service, PO Box 
1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902, by phone at 501-321-5318.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring recreation fee matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. A public input session 
will be provided and individuals who made written requests by March 30, 
2007, will have the opportunity to address the Committee at the 
meeting. The Recreation RAC is authorized by the Federal Land 
Recreation Enhancement Act, which was signed into law by President Bush 
in December 2004.

    Dated: March 9, 2007.
Cheryl G. Chatham,
Designated Federal Officer, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 07-1309 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# CE2010045EN.01011402.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/114

---

Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines ***I

P6_TA(2008)0604

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (COM(2007)0851 — C6-0007/2008 — 2007/0295(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/38)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0851), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0851),

| — | having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0007/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0007/2008),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0329/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0329/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.   Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2007)0295

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 16 December 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC, 2005/55/EC and 2005/78/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No .../2009.)

---
claim pursuant to this subsection is not effective unless notice is given as 

required by this subsection."); NRS 616C.235(1)(b) (providing that the 

insurer may close a claim only if the claimant does not timely contest the 

closure). Further, as the claim remains open, the appeals officer properly 

reversed the hearing officer's decisions in the concurrent administrative 

appeals denying transfer of care and medical expense reimbursement, and 

the appeals officer properly concluded that the reopening issue was moot. 

Because the hearing officer improperly dismissed the 

administrative appeal as untimely and the appeals officer reversed 

without determining whether closure was warranted, the merits were not 

heard. In their reply brief, appellants ask that this court remand for a 

merits determination. Under NRS 616C.235(1)(a), however, appellants' 

failure to properly serve their notice of claim closure renders the closure 

ineffective. Accordingly, a merits determination with respect to that 

notice is not warranted, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

n

)

--; 

J. 

Saitta 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

Gibbons Pickering 

cc: Hon James Todd Russell, District Judge 

James Georgeson, Settlement Judge • 

Gninasso Law, Ltd. 

Kinney & Levinson 

Carson City Clerk 

2 

(01 1947A 

■Ia
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 19, 2022

NO. 03-21-00412-CR

Joseph Albert Borgas, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-06 

Resubmission: Proposed Final Audit ) 

Report on the Utah Rqniblican Party ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Acting Seraetary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Cominission, do hereby certify that on January 06,2017, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to appravs the Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Utah Republican Party, as recommended in die Memorandum fiorn the Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated December 20,2016. 

. Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted afBrmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

1120(7 

r~yDate Dayna C. Brown 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Cormnission
# Senate Floor Activity - Wednesday, February 28, 2024

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Wednesday, February 28)

 S.Res. 568

## Executive Business (Wednesday, February 28)

 PN885

 PN1061

 PN1077

 PN1079

 PN1139

 PN1217

59

 PN1243

57

58

 PN1256

55

56

 PN1271

 PN1273

 PN1276

 PN1277

 PN1280

 PN1303

 PN1384

 PN1385

 PN1386

 PN1387

 PN1390

 PN1393

 PN1408

 PN1409

 PN1411

 PN1412

 PN1413

 PN1414-1

 PN1418

 PN1419

 PN1420

 PN1421

 PN1422

 PN1423

 PN1424

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
- 1825
- 1826
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Patent Application No. 11/313,050 entitled “Advanced Video Controller System,” filed on December 20, 2005. Foreign rights are also available. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg 5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 358989-5000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Mr. George Winborne, Patent Attorney, (256) 955-8118. For licensing issues, Dr. Russ Alexander, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 955-6018.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The present invention pertains to a video game control system where the actual physical motion and orientation of a player is automatically replicated and appreciated in a video environment.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-143  Filed 1-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SERGEI KOVALEV,

Petitioner

v.

BORIS RUBINSTEIN, DMD, GRACE WOO, DMD, YES DENTAL, P.C., HEALTH PARTNERS PLANS, INC., WILLIAM S. GEORGE, AVESIS, INC. AND CHRIS SWANKER,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 165 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1514 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

reauthorize the juvenile accountability block grants program through 

fiscal year 2014. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GOHMERT, and Mr. 

SMITH of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to reauthorize the juvenile accountability 

block grants program through fiscal year 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juvenile Accountability 

5 Block Grants Program Reauthorization Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1514 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY 

2 BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM THROUGH FISCAL 

3 YEAR 2014. 

4 Part R of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796ee et seq.) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in section 1801A(a), by striking ‘‘section 

8 1810(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1810(c)’’; 

9 (2) in section 1810(a), by striking ‘‘2009’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘2014’’; and 

11 (3) in section 1810(b), by inserting ‘‘and each 

12 of the fiscal years 2009 through 2014’’ after 

13 ‘‘2004’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CRISSIA G. CALLEJAS,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-510

[April 8, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Natasha DePrimo, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE20005929

and COWE19-009762.

Anthony Gonzalez of Light & Gonzalez, PLLC, Plantation, for appellant.

Drew Linen of RAS LaVrar, LLC, Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the Board has been scheduled to execute the provisions of the Chapter 101, Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 2006). The Board shall review DoD actuarial methods and assumptions to be used in the valuation of the Department of Defense Education Benefits Fund. Persons desiring to attend the DoD Education Benefits Board of Actuaries meeting, or make an oral presentation or submit a written statement for consideration at the meeting, must notify Inger Pettygrove at (703) 696-7413 by August 13, 2007.

Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

August 30, 2007, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 270, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inger Pettygrove, DoD Office of the Actuary, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 308, Arlington, VA 22203, (703) 696-7413.

March 28, 2007.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-1623 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BERND RATFISCH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 14-CV-3722-DT

BAY COUNTY JAIL, ET AL.,

Defendants. / 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Michael Hluchaniuk pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on October 26, 2015, the

magistrate judge recommended that this court dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint against

defendants with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and that Defendants’

Motion to Compel and Motion to Dismiss be terminated as moot. No objections have been

filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1

Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this

Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

“Report and Recommendation”, Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Defendants’ Motion to Compel [Dkt # 23] and

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ Dkt # 25] are TERMINATED AS MOOT. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to

independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

2:14-cv-13722-RHC-MJH Doc # 28 Filed 11/18/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 135
Dated: November 18, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or

pro se parties on this date, November 18, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2

2:14-cv-13722-RHC-MJH Doc # 28 Filed 11/18/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 136
7 Hanover Square
                                                    New York, NY 10004-2616
                                                    212 422-1000
                                                    FAX 212 422-0144


                                        (logo)Grant Thornton
                                Grant Thornton LLP  Accountants and     
                                                    Management Consultants

            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT         The U.S. Member Firm of
                                                    Grant Thornton lnternational



To the Board of Directors
    DALE MORTGAGE BANKERS CORP.



We have examined  management's  assertion  about Dale Mortgage  Bankers  Corp.'s
compliance with minimum servicing  standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP)  as of and for the  year  ended  December  31,  1995,    included  in the
accompanying management assertion.  Management is responsible for Dale  Mortgage
Bankers  Corp.'s  compliance  with  those  minimum  servicing   standards.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,   on a test  basis,  evidence  about Dale  Mortgage  Bankers  Corp.'s
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal  determination on Dale Mortgage  Bankers Corp.'s  compliance
with minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Dale Mortgage Bankers Corp. complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1995, is fairly stated in all material respects.



/s/Grant Thornton LLP


New York, New York
March 25, 1996
§ 98.62 Allotments from the Mandatory Fund. ( a ) Each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia will be allocated from the funds appropriated under section 418(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act, less the amounts reserved for technical assistance pursuant to § 98.60(b)(1) an amount of funds equal to the greater of: ( 1 ) the Federal share of its child care expenditures under subsections (g) and (i) of section 402 of the Social Security Act (as in effect before October 1, 1995) for fiscal year 1994 or 1995 (whichever is greater); or
( 2 ) the average of the Federal share of its child care expenditures under the subsections referred to in subparagraph (a)(1) of this section for fiscal years 1992 through 1994.
( b ) For Indian Tribes and tribal organizations will be allocated from the funds appropriated under section 418(a)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act shall be allocated according to the formula at paragraph (c) of this section. In Alaska, only the following 13 entities shall receive allocations under this subpart, in accordance with the formula at paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) The Metlakatla Indian Community of the Annette Islands Reserve:
( 2 ) Arctic Slope Native Association;
( 3 ) Kawerak, Inc.;
( 4 ) Maniilaq Association;
( 5 ) Association of Village Council Presidents;
( 6 ) Tanana Chiefs Conference;
( 7 ) Cook Inlet Tribal Council;
( 8 ) Bristol Bay Native Association;
( 9 ) Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Association;
( 10 ) Chugachmuit;
( 11 ) Tlingit and Haida Central Council;
( 12 ) Kodiak Area Native Association; and
( 13 ) Copper River Native Association.
( c ) ( 1 ) Grants to individual Tribes with 50 or more Indian children, and to Tribes with fewer than 50 Indian children that apply as part of a consortium pursuant to § 98.80(b)(1), will be equal to an amount per Indian child under age 13 (or such similar age as determined by the Secretary from the best available data), which is determined by dividing the amount of funds available, by the number of Indian children in each Tribe's service area pursuant to § 98.80(e).
( 2 ) Tribal consortia will receive grants that are equal to the sum of the individual grants of their members.
( d ) The Territories will be allocated from the funds appropriated under section 418(a)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act based upon the following factors: ( 1 ) A Young Child factor—the ratio of the number of children in the Territory under five years of age to the number of such children in all Territories; and
( 2 ) An Allotment Proportion factor—determined by dividing the per capita income of all individuals in all the Territories by the per capita income of all individuals in the Territory. ( i ) Per capita income shall be: ( A ) Equal to the average of the annual per capita incomes for the most recent period of three consecutive years for which satisfactory data are available at the time such determination is made; and
( B ) Determined every two years.
( ii ) [Reserved]
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998, as amended at 89 FR 15415, Mar. 1, 2024
#### James Chaffee, *Respondent, v.*Frances M. Swan, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.