alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 4, 2010

The Honorable Lisa Jackson

Administrator

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Ariel Rios Building (Mail Code 1101)

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20460

Re: Petition for Reconsideration of Portions of the Final Rule: National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines

Dear Administrator Jackson:

I am writing in support of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s 

(NRECA) October 19, 2010, Petition for Reconsideration of portions of the Final 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal 

Combustion Engines promulgated on August 20, 2010, (75 Fed. Reg. 51,570). 

Lemke Farm is a member-owner of Cass County Electric Cooperative Inc. (CCEC) and is 

currently participating in its electric load management program by using our stationary 

engine generator. The engine generator provides electric power to our facility during 

times of peak load conditions. In the past several years, the total hours of operation 

logged on the generator for this program has not exceeded 100 hours.

Inasmuch as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules allow an emergency use 

engine generator to operate up to 100 hours annually for non-emergency situations, why

should it make any difference how a business chooses to operate its generator within that 

100 hour limitation? In other words, why are there restrictions within those 100 hours of 

non-emergency use for peak shaving? The option to use my generator as part of a peak 

shaving program on a limited basis is important to me and helps my cooperative operate 

its distribution system most effectively. It seems to me that this small change to your 

rules would make the rules more reasonable without sacrificing air quality.

Lemke Farm supports NRECA’s petition to remove the restrictions in use of emergency

stationary engine generators as they pertain to use for peak shaving. Since the EPA has 

determined that 100 hours of non-emergency use of a stationary engine generator poses 

little health risk or environmental harm above that already contemplated in the rule, I 
The Honorable Lisa Jackson

November 4, 2010

Page 2

believe it should not make any difference under what conditions the unit is operated 

within that the 100 hours of allowable non-emergency operation 

In conclusion, Lemke Farm respectfully requests the EPA reconsiders its proposed rule 

for spark ignition (SI) engines. Assuming the agency recognizes the common-sense logic 

presented in this letter with regard to the proposed SI rules, and the proposed changes put 

forth by NRECA, we also urge the agency to apply that same logic to the current RICE 

rules so as to make the final NESHAP rule consistent and uniform throughout all 

stationary engine generators powered by liquid fossil-fuels.

Lemke Farm respectfully requests consideration of its request and proposed changes, and 

thanks the EPA in advance for the same. Thank you for your prompt attention and I look 

forward to your response.

Sincerely,

cc: Robert Wayland, EPA

Melanie King, EPA

Kevin Bromberg, SBA
# C_2008047EN.01002101.xml

| 20.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/21

---

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on measuring instruments

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonized standards under the directive)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonized standards under the directive)

(2008/C 47/06)

| European Standardisation Organisation (1) | Reference and title of the standard
  (and reference document) | Reference of the superseded standard | Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of the superseded standard
  (Note 1) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CENELEC | EN 50470-1:2006
  Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) — Part 1: General requirements, tests and test conditions — Metering equipment (class indexes A, B and C) | NONE | — |
| CENELEC | EN 50470-2:2006
  Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) — Part 2: Particular requirements — Electromechanical meters for active energy (class indexes A and B) | NONE | — |
| CENELEC | EN 50470-3:2006
  Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) — Part 3: Particular requirements — Static meters for active energy (class indexes A, B and C) | NONE | — |

European Standardisation Organisation (1)

1

Reference and title of the standard

(and reference document)

Reference of the superseded standard

Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of the superseded standard

(Note 1)

CENELEC

EN 50470-1:2006

Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) — Part 1: General requirements, tests and test conditions — Metering equipment (class indexes A, B and C)

NONE

—

CENELEC

EN 50470-2:2006

Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) — Part 2: Particular requirements — Electromechanical meters for active energy (class indexes A and B)

NONE

—

CENELEC

EN 50470-3:2006

Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) — Part 3: Particular requirements — Static meters for active energy (class indexes A, B and C)

NONE

—

---

(1)  European Standardisation Organisation:

1

| — | CEN: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 36, B-1050 Brussels, Tel. (32-2) 550 08 11, fax (32-2) 550 08 19 (http://www.cenorm.be) |
| --- | --- |

—

CEN: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 36, B-1050 Brussels, Tel. (32-2) 550 08 11, fax (32-2) 550 08 19 (http://www.cenorm.be)

| — | CENELEC: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 35, B-1050 Brussels, Tel. (32-2) 519 68 71, fax (32-2) 519 69 19 (http://www.cenelec.org) |
| --- | --- |

—

CENELEC: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 35, B-1050 Brussels, Tel. (32-2) 519 68 71, fax (32-2) 519 69 19 (http://www.cenelec.org)

| — | ETSI: 650, route des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia Antipolis, Tel. (33) 492 94 42 12, fax (33) 493 65 47 16 (http://www.etsi.org). |
| --- | --- |

—

ETSI: 650, route des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia Antipolis, Tel. (33) 492 94 42 12, fax (33) 493 65 47 16 (http://www.etsi.org).

---
P. 1


# OAR Box 1834 Prepped byKeeiaRichards



### Document

Number: 

# 41 ) IV-E-14 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 7

Printed 11/10/20082:14:35PM

Sheet 41 of 61P. 2

T 4 

# iSEZ- j 4-90-07- UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y"W"£~/ 4 AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

# I I 8 111 1 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

### MA Y2 T199 4 EP AAI R DOCKE TMA Y2 6 199

4 MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Meetin g o nApri l 21 , 199 4 wit hth e America nPetroleu m

Institut e (API ) regardin g th e Fuel s an dFue l Additive s (F/FA ) Registratio n(Healt hEffect s testing ) Progra m FROM : Judit hGray , Senio r Projec t Manag e

Specia l Regulator yProject s Branch , TO : Docke t A-90-0 7 Attendin g th e meetin g wer e th e following : Fro m API : Willia mFrick , Anit a Ducca , Rober t Wilkenfeld , Rober t Drew , Joh nThornto n Fro m EPA/OMS : Richar dWilson , Cheste r France , Car l Fulper , Davi d Kortum , Ine s Figueroa , Rober t Johnson , Judit hGra y Fro m EPA/OGC : Lori e Schmidt , Mar yElle nLevin e
AP I representative s me t wit hEP Aofficial s a t API' s reques t t o discus s th e F/F Atestin g rule . AP I reiterate da numbe r o f th e point s mad e i nit s previou s writte ncomment s t o th e propose drule , emphasizin g th e alternativ e testin g schem e presente dtherein . AP I argue d tha t Tie r 2 testin g withi nthre e year s i s impossible , notin g tha t it s alternativ e testin g schem e woul dtak e a t leas t fou r year s fo r jus t on e grou p t o complete . AP I furthe r argue dtha t i t wa s no t soun d scienc e t o compar e test s conducte di ndifferen t laboratories , an d tha t i t wa s no t possibl e t o tes t th e numerou s endpoint s require d i nth e propose d rul e o nth e sam e se t o f animals .
# C_2008102EN.01001801.xml

| 24.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 102/07)

| Aid No | XR 171/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Romania |
| Region | — |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Schemă de ajutor de stat regional privind reciclarea și depozitarea deșeurilor provenite din activităţi industriale și gospodării individuale |
| Legal basis | Hotărârea Comitetului de Avizare nr. 15/18.10.2007 a Administraţiei Fondului pentru Mediu pentru aprobarea schemei de ajutor de stat regional privind reciclarea și depozitarea deșeurilor provenite din activităţi industriale și gospodării individuale |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | RON 76,6 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 50 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 18.10.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2011 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu |
| Splaiul Independenţei nr. 294, corp A, sector 6 |
| RO-060031 București |
| Tel. (40-21) 319 48 49 |

Aid No

XR 171/07

Member State

Romania

Region

—

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

ad hoc

Schemă de ajutor de stat regional privind reciclarea și depozitarea deșeurilor provenite din activităţi industriale și gospodării individuale

Legal basis

Hotărârea Comitetului de Avizare nr. 15/18.10.2007 a Administraţiei Fondului pentru Mediu pentru aprobarea schemei de ajutor de stat regional privind reciclarea și depozitarea deșeurilor provenite din activităţi industriale și gospodării individuale

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

RON 76,6 million

Maximum aid intensity

50 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

18.10.2007

Duration

31.12.2011

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu

Splaiul Independenţei nr. 294, corp A, sector 6

RO-060031 București

Tel. (40-21) 319 48 49

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

http://www.afm.ro/main/proiecte_stuf/scheme_finantare/proiect_reciclare_depozitare_deseuri.pdf

Other information

—

---
§ 133.135 Rescue boats. ( a ) Each OSV must carry at least one rescue boat. Each rescue boat must be approved under approval series 160.156 and equipped as specified in table 133.175 of this part.
( b ) Offshore supply vessels, as an alternative to the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section, may carry a motor-propelled workboat or a launch if the workboat or launch must meet the embarkation, launching, and recovery arrangement requirements in § 133.160(a), (c), (d), (e), and (f).
( c ) A rescue boat is not required for a vessel operating on the continental shelf of the United States, if— ( 1 ) The OCMI determines the vessel is arranged to allow a helpless person to be recovered from the water;
( 2 ) The recovery of the helpless person can be observed from the navigating bridge; and
( 3 ) The vessel does not regularly engage in operations that restrict its maneuverability.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25304, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58463, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2011-0618, 76 FR 60754, Sept. 30, 2011]
# CE2009247EN.01008301.xml

| 15.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 247/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 247/83

---

Thursday 10 April 2008Eurostars ***I

P6_TA(2008)0116

European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 April 2008 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the participation by the Community in a research and development programme aimed at supporting research and development performing SMEs undertaken by several Member States (COM(2007)0514 — C6-0281/2007 — 2007/0188(COD))

2009/C 247 E/18

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0514),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 169 and 172(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0281/2007),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0064/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
§ 120.370 General grounding requirements. ( a ) A vessel's hull must not carry current as a conductor except for the following systems: ( 1 ) Impressed current cathodic protection systems; or
( 2 ) Battery systems for engine starting.
( b ) Receptacle outlets and attachment plugs for portable lamps, tools, and similar apparatus operating at 100 volts or more, must have a grounding pole and a grounding conductor in the portable cord.
( c ) Each nonmetallic mast and top mast must have a lightning ground conductor.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2007-23639]


Deadline for Notification of Intent To Use the Airport 
Improvement Program (AIP) Sponsor, Cargo, and Nonprimary Entitlement 
Funds for Fiscal Year 2006

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces May 1, 
2007, as the deadline for each airport sponsor to notify the FAA that 
it will use its fiscal year 2007 entitlement funds to accomplish 
projects identified in the Airports Capital Improvement Plan that was 
formulated in the spring of 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Molar, Manager, Airports 
Financial Assistance Division, Office of Airport Planning and 
Programming, APP-500, on (202) 267-3831.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 47105(f) of Title 49, United States 
Code, provides that the sponsor of each airport to which funds are 
apportioned shall notify the Secretary by such time and in a form as 
prescribed by the Secretary, of the sponsor's intent to apply for the 
funds apportioned to it (entitlements). This notice applies only to 
those airports that have had entitlement funds apportioned to them, 
except those nonprimary airports located in designated Block Grant 
States. Notification of the sponsor's intent to apply during fiscal 
year 2007 for any of its available entitlement funds including those 
unused from prior years, shall be in the form of inclusion of projects 
for fiscal year 2007 in the Airports Capital Improvement Plan.
    This notice is promulgated to expedite and prioritize grants in the 
final quarter of the fiscal year. Absent an acceptable application by 
May 1, 2007, FAA will defer an airport's entitlement funds until the 
next fiscal year. Pursuant to the authority and limitations in section 
47117(f), FAA will issue discretionary grants in an aggregate amount 
not to exceed the aggregate amount of deferred entitlement funds. 
Airport sponsors may request unused entitlements after September 30, 
2007 as provided in the law.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 8, 2007.
Barry L. Molar,
Manager, Airports Financial Assistance Division.
[FR Doc. 07-1017 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### § 400.119 Interstate movement.

After the initial placement of an unaccompanied minor, the same procedures that govern the movement of nonrefugee foster cases to other States apply to the movement of unaccompanied minors to other States.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNKNOWN PARTY, named as USP 

Tucson Warden, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 18-17189 

D.C. No. 4:18-cv-00192-DCB-DTF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughan Pinson appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to comply 

with the court’s order to file an amended petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 27 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-17189 

In the opening brief, Pinson fails to address how the district court abused

its discretion in dismissing her action for failure to comply with the court’s order to 

file an amended petition. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 

2002) (dismissal for failure to comply with a district court’s order requiring 

submission of pleadings within specified time is reviewed for abuse of discretion). 

Accordingly, Pinson has waived her challenge to the dismissal order. See Smith v. 

Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised 

by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

AFFIRMED.
# Senate Floor Activity - Friday, March 22, 2024

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Friday, March 22)

 H.R. 2882

103

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

 S.Amdt. 1722

 S.Amdt. 1790

 S.Amdt. 1791

 S.Amdt. 1792

 S.Amdt. 1793

 S.Amdt. 1794

## Legislative Business (Saturday, March 23)

 H.R. 2882

103

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

 S.Amdt. 1706

 S.Amdt. 1713

 S.Amdt. 1718

 S.Amdt. 1722

 S.Amdt. 1781

 S.Amdt. 1790

 S.Amdt. 1791

 S.Amdt. 1792

 S.Amdt. 1793

 S.Amdt. 1794

 S.Amdt. 1795

 S.Amdt. 1804

 H.Con.Res. 100

 S. 1258

 S. 3613

 S.Amdt. 1818

 S.Res. 333

 S.Res. 532

 S.Res. 625

## Executive Business (Friday, March 22)

 PN1427

102

 PN1428

104

## Executive Business (Saturday, March 23)

 PN1083

 PN1084

 PN1085

 PN1086

 PN1174

 PN1175

 PN1191

 PN1192

 PN1193

 PN1265

 PN1267

 PN1283

 PN1290

 PN1291

 PN1324

 PN1388

 PN1389

 PN1405

 PN1438

 PN1439

 PN1440

 PN1441

 PN1443

 PN1445

 PN1446

 PN1447

 PN1465

 PN1466

 PN1467

 PN1468

 PN1478

 PN1479

 PN1480

 PN1481

 PN1482

 PN1483

 PN1484

 PN1485

 PN1486

 PN1487

 PN1488

 PN1490

 PN1491

 PN1492

 PN1493

 PN1494

 PN1495

 PN1496

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
§ 115.655 Hull examination reports. ( a ) If you use only divers for the underwater survey portion of the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE), you must provide the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), with a written hull examination report. This report must include thickness gauging results, bearing clearances, a copy of the audio and video recordings, and any other information that will help the OCMI evaluate your vessel for a credit hull exam. The third party examiner must sign the report and confirm the validity of its contents.
( b ) If you use an underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) as the predominate means to examine the vessel's underwater hull plating, you must provide the OCMI with a report in a format that is acceptable to the OCMI, per § 115.650(b) of this part.
( c ) The OCMI will evaluate the hull examination report and grant a credit hull exam if satisfied with the condition of the vessel. If approved and you exclusively use divers to examine the hull plating, you may receive a credit hull exam to 36 months. (Underwater examinations are required twice every 5 years). If approved and you use an underwater ROV as the predominant means to examine the underwater hull plating, you may receive a credit hull exam up to 60 months (5 years).
( d ) At least 60 days prior to each scheduled underwater exam, the owner may request a waiver from the OCMI if: ( 1 ) A satisfactory exam has been completed within the last three years;
( 2 ) The conditions during the last exam allowed at least 80 percent of the bottom surface to be viewed and recorded; and
( 3 ) The results of the last exam indicated that an extended interval is safe and reasonable.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21081, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended by USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47383, Aug. 5, 2004]
EX 32-01


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),

I, Harry Masuda, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Human BioSystems (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)  the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the
period ended September 30, 2004, to which this certification is attached as an
exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated: December 9, 2004


/s/ Harry Masuda
-----------------
Harry Masuda
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer