alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1817 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘John S. Wilder 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2009 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘John S. Wilder Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN S. WILDER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 116 North West Street in Somer6 ville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘John S. Wilder Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1817 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John S. Wilder Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### § 109.335 Stowage of work vests.

The master or person in charge shall insure that no work vest is stowed where life preservers are stowed.
#### § 136.205 Description.

A towing vessel's COI describes the vessel, routes that it may travel, minimum manning requirements and total persons allowed onboard, safety equipment and appliances required to be onboard, horsepower, and other information pertinent to the vessel's operations as determined by the OCMI.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 2121

_____________________________
W ILLIE G. W ESTBERRY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Barbara K. Hobbs , Judge

. November 7, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , W INOKUR , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Michael J. Titus
, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi
, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxl er and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 98.48 Nondiscrimination in admissions on the basis of religion. ( a ) Child care providers (other than family child care providers, as defined in § 98.2) that receive assistance through grants and contracts under the CCDF shall not discriminate in admissions against any child on the basis of religion.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not prohibit a child care provider from selecting children for child care slots that are not funded directly (i.e., through grants or contracts to providers) with assistance provided under the CCDF because such children or their family members participate on a regular basis in other activities of the organization that owns or operates such provider.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section, if 80 percent or more of the operating budget of a child care provider comes from Federal or State funds, including direct or indirect assistance under the CCDF, the Lead Agency shall assure that before any further CCDF assistance is given to the provider, ( 1 ) The grant or contract relating to the assistance, or
( 2 ) The admission policies of the provider specifically provide that no person with responsibilities in the operation of the child care program, project, or activity will discriminate, on the basis of religion, in the admission of any child.
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998. Redesignated at 81 FR 67584, Sept. 30, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, 
February 21, 2007, 1 p.m. to February 21, 2007, 4 p.m. National 
Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 
20852 which was published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2007, 
72 FR 7897.
    The meeting will be held March 15, 2007 from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: March 5, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1115 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

STOP RECKLESS ECONOMIC INSTABILITY

CAUSED BY DEMOCRATS, el al.

Plaintiffs,

V.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant,

Case No. l:14-cv-397 (AJT/IDD)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No.

56] and Defendant Federal Election Commission's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No.

57] (collectively, the "Motions"). Upon consideration ofthe Motions, the memoranda submitted

in support thereof and in opposition thereto, the argument presented at the hearing held on

October 31, 2014, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is

hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 56] be, and the

same hereby is, DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that DefendantFederal ElectionCommission's Motion for Summary

Judgment [Doc. No. 57] be, and the same herebyis, GRANTED, and the action is hereby

DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to enterjudgment in favor of defendant Federal Election

Commission and against plaintiffs Stop Reckless Economic Instability Caused By Democrats,

the Tea Party Leadership Fund, and the Alexandria Republican City Committee and intervenor

Case 1:14-cv-00397-AJT-IDD Document 77 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 1105
Case 1:14-cv-00397-AJT-IDD Document 77 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 1106
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.


I, Adiv Baruch, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of B.O.S. Better Online
Solutions Ltd (the "registrant");


2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;


(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];


(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and


(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):


(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and


(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: June 17, 2004


/s/ Adiv Baruch
---------------
Adiv Baruch, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 13.115 Chemical testing requirements.

Each applicant for an original tankerman endorsement must provide evidence of having passed a chemical test for dangerous drugs or of qualifying for an exemption from testing in § 16.220 of this chapter as specified in § 10.225(b)(5) of this subchapter.

[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77988, Dec. 24, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                       233
<INVENTORY>                                      6,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,730
<PP&E>                                          13,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,808)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,964
<SALES>                                          9,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,293
<CGS>                                            6,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,710
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    244
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

p1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147529

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147529

COA: 312452

Montcalm CC: 2007-009015-FC

LOUIS ALAN LATHROP, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TRACEY SMITH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:14-cv-13795 

v. District Judge David M. Lawson 

 Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

THE FOOD BANK OF EASTERN 

MICHIGAN, 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SANCTIONS (DE 44) 

 On November 25, 2015, Defendant filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. (DE 44.) The matter came before me for a 

hearing on December 23, 2015. At the hearing, Defendant’s counsel stated on the 

record that she wished to withdraw the motion. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion 

is denied as moot. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 23, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2:14-cv-13795-DML-APP Doc # 58 Filed 12/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1052
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the document was sent to parties of record on 

December 23, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:14-cv-13795-DML-APP Doc # 58 Filed 12/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1053
§ 111.01-5 Protection from bilge water. Each of the following in or around the bilge area must be arranged or constructed so that it cannot be damaged by bilge water: ( a ) Generators.
( b ) Motors.
( c ) Electric coupling.
( d ) Electric cable.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28275, June 4, 1996]
§ 128.410 Ship's service refrigeration systems. No self-contained unit either for air-conditioning or for refrigerated spaces for ship's stores need comply with § 58.20-5, 58.20-10, 58.20-15, 58.20-20(a), or 58.20-20(b) of this chapter if— ( a ) The unit uses a fluorocarbon refrigerant allowed by part 147 of this chapter;
( b ) The manufacturer certifies that the unit is suitable for its intended purpose; and
( c ) Electrical wiring meets the applicable requirements in subchapter J of this chapter.
#### § 112.43-9 Signaling lights.

Each signaling light must be supplied by a branch circuit that supplies no other equipment.
§ 119.435 Integral fuel tanks. ( a ) Diesel fuel tanks may not be built integral with the hull of a vessel unless the hull is made of steel or aluminum.
( b ) During the initial inspection for certification of a vessel, integral fuel tanks must withstand a hydrostatic pressure test of 35 kPa (5 psig), or the maximum pressure head to which they may be subjected in service, whichever is greater. A standpipe of 3.5 meters (11.5 feet) in height attached to the tank may be filled with water to accomplish the 35 kPa (5 psig) test.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- RTD Construction, Inc. Under Contract No. NNK12CA59C APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60434

Edward J. Kinberg, Esq.

Widerman Malek, PL Melbourne, FL Scott W. Barber, Esq.

NASA ChiefTrial Attorney Richard J. McCarthy, Esq.

Senior Attorney NASA Headquarters Washington, DC Ellen E. Espenschied, Esq.

Assistant ChiefCounsel Kennedy Space Center, FL ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 6 January 2016

DA YID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60434, Appeal ofRTD Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXHIBIT 99.6

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I,
Michael MacMillan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



---



Date:
July 30, 2003



|/s/Michael MacMillanMichael MacMillan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I,
W. Judson Martin, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



---



Date:
July 30, 2003



|/s/W. Judson MartinW. Judson Martin
Senior Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
§ 125.105 International certificates for OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC. An OSV of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must obtain and maintain the following international certificates as a prerequisite to obtaining a Certificate of Inspection: ( a ) Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate in accordance with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (SOLAS, 1974, as amended).
( b ) Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate in accordance with SOLAS, 1974, as amended.
( c ) Safety Management Certificate in accordance with SOLAS, 1974, as amended.
( d ) International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate in accordance with the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution at Sea, as amended (MARPOL 73/78).
( e ) International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate in accordance with MARPOL 73/78.
( f ) International Load Line Certificate in accordance with the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, as subsequently modified by its Protocol of 1988, as amended.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48933, Aug. 18, 2014]
July 17,2014 Secretary Anthony Foxx US Secretary ofTransportation DOT Office ofthe Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 MAYOR'S OFFICE IMatt Bemrich, Mayor I David R. Fierke, City Manager 

# u

SentElectronically via E-Mail

RE: Petition ofFort Dodge, IA for a Two-Year Waiver from the 10-Enplanement Statute Docket-DOT-OST-2001-l0682 Dear SecretaryFoxx, On behalfofthe City ofFort Dodge, I am submittingthis petition for atwo-year exemption from 49 U.S.C. 

### §41731(a)(l)(B) in terminating our EAS eligibility based upon the 10 passenger per day statute. This request is based upon airport enplanementhistory andthe fact that our air carrier suspended all air service on February 1, 2014 due to a pilot shortage. The data shows thatthe airport had 9.4 passengers per day during the measurement period. We missed reaching the 10 passenger per day statue by only 16 passengers per month. Duringthis time period, the aircarrier cancelled 54 flights due to mechanicals and no crew equally 1,026 available seats. The airport history data demonstrates that 2013 was not atypical year and in fact, was the lowest number of enplanements onrecord since 1976. The DOT data shows that duringthe pastten years priorto 2013, we averaged more than 24 passenger enplanements per day. We are requesting a two year exemption waiver because we will be in this category again in 2014 due to the aircarrier's decision to suspend our service on February 1, 2014. I feel that including us on the termination list when we did not have an air carrier providing air service does not meet the intent ofthe statute. Our City has been planning and working creatively to enhance our appeal as a regional center for retail and services for a large geographic area ofCentral and North Iowa. In addition to new and enhanced shopping, our community is workingto enhance ortrails, leisure time, and quality oflife features. All of our planning and implementation ties in with our economic development effotts to grow our regional and global footprint. Commercial air service is a key cog in pullingthe entire package together ofenabling us to become sustainable and viable as a location to live, work and play well into the 21st Century. We appreciate the opportunityto receive a two year exemption waiver based upon on ourhistory and the special circumstancesthat negatively impacted our airport. Sincerely,

# /l!'d@~ Mayor Matt Bemrich City ofFort Dodge

Municipal Building • 819 1stAvenue South • Fort Dodge, lA 50501 • Phone: 515.573.7144 • Fax: 515.573.5751 Email: mayorofdodge@fortdodgeiowa.org
[Ranger Aerospace Corporation letterhead]

                                 August 31, 2000



Stephen  D.  Townes
318  Scarborough  Drive
Greer,  SC  29650

Re:  Liquidity  Agreement/Right  to  Put  Certain  Shares  of  Executive  Stock

Dear  Steve:

     Reference  is  hereby made to that certain Third Executive Stock Agreement,
dated  as  of  August  31,  2000 (the "Stock Agreement"), among Ranger Aerospace
                                       ---------------
Corporation  (the "Company") and you.  Each capitalized term used herein without
                   -------
definition  shall  have  the  meaning  given  such  term in the Stock Agreement.

     In  order  to  allow  you  to  pay any Additional Tax Liability in a timely
manner,  to  the  extent you incur an Additional Tax Liability while employed by
the  Company,  you  will  have  the right to require the Company to purchase the
number of shares of Executive Stock (or fraction thereof) with an aggregate Fair
Market  Value  equal  to  the  Additional  Tax  Liability.  For purposes of this
agreement,  "Additional  Tax  Liability"  shall  mean in any tax year in which a
final  tax  adjustment  is  made by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to
your  purchase  of  Executive  Stock  under  the Stock Agreement, all additional
taxes,  interest and penalties applicable to any such final tax adjustment.  The
undersigned's obligation to purchase such shares of Executive Stock hereunder is
conditioned  upon  your  providing  the  undersigned  with documentation that is
reasonably  satisfactory  to  the Company  evidencing the final determination of
such  Additional  Tax  Liability.
It  is  the intent of this agreement to provide you with liquidity for a portion
of  your Executive Stock so as allow you to pay on a timely basis any Additional
Tax  Liability.  This  agreement  shall at all times be interpreted consistently
with  such  intent.

     Very  truly  yours,

     RANGER  AEROSPACE  CORPORATION

     By:  __________________________________
       George  Schwartz,  Chairman  of  the  Board

Agreed  and  acknowledged  as  of
date  first  written  above:

_______________________
Stephen  D.  Townes

<PAGE>