alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 86.61 Sex as a bona-fide occupational qualification.

A recipient may take action otherwise prohibited by this subpart provided it is shown that sex is a bona-fide occupational qualification for that action, such that consideration of sex with regard to such action is essential to successful operation of the employment function concerned. A recipient shall not take action pursuant to this section which is based upon alleged comparative employment characteristics or stereotyped characterizations of one or the other sex, or upon preference based on sex of the recipient, employees, students, or other persons, but nothing contained in this section shall prevent a recipient from considering an employee's sex in relation to employment in a locker room or toilet facility used only by members of one sex.

(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)
Exhibit 32.1

        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
International Imaging Systems, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
I, C. Leo Smith, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of International
Imaging Systems, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

          (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
          March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
          for the three months ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of International Imaging Systems, Inc.

                                /s/ C. Leo Smith
                                ----------------
                                    C. Leo Smith
                        Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer


November 16, 2004

                                       19
§ 128.430 Non-integral keel cooler installations. ( a ) Each hull penetration for a non-integral keel cooler installation must be made through a cofferdam or at a seachest and must be provided with isolation valves fitted as close to the sea inlet as possible.
( b ) Each non-integral keel cooler must be protected against damage from debris and grounding by protective guards or by recessing the cooler into the hull.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49331, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58463, Sept. 29, 2000]
§ 14.201 Voyages upon which shipping articles are required. ( a ) Before proceeding either upon a foreign, intercoastal, or coastwise voyage (including a voyage on the Great Lakes) listed in paragraph (b) of this section or with the engagement or replacement of a merchant mariner for such a voyage, each master or individual in charge of a vessel or seagoing barge of the United States must execute shipping articles however prepared, manually or electronically. The master or individual in charge and each mariner engaged or replaced must sign the articles.
( b ) Except as provided by § 14.203 of this subpart, articles are required upon each voyage by a vessel of the United States— ( 1 ) Of 100 GRT or more, on a foreign voyage, which is a voyage from a port in the United States to any foreign port other than a port in— ( i ) Canada;
( ii ) Mexico; or
( iii ) The West Indies.
( 2 ) Of 75 GRT or more on a voyage between a port of the United States on the Atlantic Ocean and a port of the United States on the Pacific Coast; or
( 3 ) Of 50 GRT or more on a voyage between a port in one State and a port in another State other than an adjoining State.
[CGD 94-004, 61 FR 56637, Nov. 4, 1996, as amended by USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77999, Dec. 24, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2197 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2197

  To assist the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
 determine whether a franchisee is affiliated with a franchisor in the 
     temporary employee services industry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

Ms. Bean (for herself and Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To assist the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
 determine whether a franchisee is affiliated with a franchisor in the 
     temporary employee services industry, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Temporary Employees Franchise 
Improvement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE SERVICES FRANCHISES.

    In determining whether a franchisee is affiliated with a franchisor 
in the temporary employee services industry, the Administrator of the 
Small Business Administration shall--
            (1) continue to apply historically considered affiliation 
        factors in determining whether a business is affiliated with 
        another business or the franchisor in the temporary staffing 
        industry;
            (2) promulgate such other rules and regulations as 
        necessary to determine affiliation within the temporary 
        employee services industry as the Administrator determines 
        consistent with the Small Business Act; and
            (3) consider the processing of payroll and billing by a 
        franchisor as customary and common practice in the temporary 
        employee services industry that does not provide probative 
        weight on affiliation, to the extent that the temporary 
        staffing personnel are interviewed, hired, trained, assigned, 
        and subject to discharge by the franchisee.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1858 

To provide for a boundary adjustment and land conveyances involving Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado, to correct the effects of an erroneous 

land survey that resulted in approximately 7 acres of the Crystal Lakes 

Subdivision, Ninth Filing, encroaching on National Forest System land, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2009 

Ms. MARKEY of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a boundary adjustment and land conveyances 

involving Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado, to correct 

the effects of an erroneous land survey that resulted 

in approximately 7 acres of the Crystal Lakes Subdivision, Ninth Filing, encroaching on National Forest System land, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1858 IH

1 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT AND LAND CONVEY2 ANCES, ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST, COL3 ORADO. 

4 (a) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundaries of 

5 Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado, are hereby modified 

6 to exclude from the national forest a parcel of real prop7 erty consisting of approximately 7 acres within the Crystal 

8 Lakes Subdivision as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Crys9 tal Lakes Encroachment, HR 3299’’ and dated July 15, 

10 2008. 

11 (b) CONVEYANCE OF LAND REMOVED FROM NA12 TIONAL FOREST.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall use 

13 the authority provided by Public Law 97–465 (commonly 

14 known as the Small Tracts Act; 16 U.S.C. 521c–521i) to 

15 convey all right, title, and interest of the United States 

16 in and to the real property excluded from the boundaries 

17 of Roosevelt National Forest under subsection (a) to the 

18 landowners whose real property adjoins the excluded land 

19 and who, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, oc20 cupy the excluded land. 

21 (c) CONSIDERATION.—The conveyances required by 

22 subsection (b) shall be made without consideration. 

23 (d) DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY.—The exact 

24 acreage and legal description of the land excluded from 

25 the boundaries of Roosevelt National Forest under subVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:06 Apr 03, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1858.IH H1858

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1858 IH

1 section (a) and conveyed under subsection (b) shall be de2 termined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### § 14.101 Purpose of part.

This part prescribes rules for the shipment and discharge of merchant mariners aboard certain vessels of the United States.
Submitted on record and briefs March 14,

reversed and remanded for a new trial April 17, 1996

#### In the Matter of Michael Guilford, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*MICHAEL GUILFORD, *Appellant.*

(9507-67260; CA A89605)

914 P2d 717

Theresa M. Kohlhoff filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*441PER CURIAM

The allegedly mentally ill person appeals an order of civil commitment under ORS 426.130. She contends, *inter alia,*that the trial court did not adequately advise her of her rights specified in ORS 426.100(1). The state agrees that the court erred; so do we. *State v. Allison,*129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Appeal: 12-1124 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/02/2012 Page: 1 of 4
Appeal: 12-1124 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/02/2012 Page: 2 of 4
Appeal: 12-1124 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/02/2012 Page: 3 of 4
Appeal: 12-1124 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/02/2012 Page: 4 of 4
[File No. 6289.]

#### W. E. STITZEL, Petitioner, v. ROBERT BYRNE as Secretary of State of North Dakota, Respondent.

(256 N. W. 374.)

Opinion filed July 20, 1934.

*702
      *Howard O. Fuller j*for petitioner.

P. *O. Salhre,*Attorney General, for respondent.

Per Curiam :

The petitioner invokes the original jurisdiction of this court in an application for a writ of mandamus directed to the secretary of state requiring him to receive, file and make an official record of the appointment of the petitioner to the position of state highway commissioner.

The application was based upon an appointment by the lieutenant governor assuming to act as governor upon the theory that the powers and duties of the office of governor had devolved upon him.

Jt is conceded that since the matter was argued the secretary of state has received and filed applicant’s oath of office tendered under a new appointment. Consequently the issues involved in this application have become moot. The proceedings are dismissed without costs.

Burr, Ch. J., and Burice, Nuessle and Moellring, JJ., and Mc-Kenna, Dist. J., concur.

Mr. Justice Christianson, being disqualified, did not participate, Hon. Geo. M. McKenna, Judge of the Third Judicial District, sitting in his stead.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2140 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2140

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the withholding 
 requirement with respect to proceeds from certain pari-mutuel wagers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2009

  Mr. Yarmuth (for himself and Mr. Boustany) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the withholding 
 requirement with respect to proceeds from certain pari-mutuel wagers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parimutuel Conformity and Equality 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENT FOR PROCEEDS FROM 
              PARIMUTUEL POOL WAGERS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 3402(q)(3) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to winnings which are subject to 
        withholding) is amended--
                    (A) by striking clause (ii),
                    (B) by striking ``, or'' at the end of clause (i) 
                and inserting a period, and
                    (C) by striking ``(C) Sweepstakes, wagering pools, 
                certain parimutuel pools'' and all that follows through 
                ``(ii) a wager'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(C) Sweepstakes, wagering pools, and lotteries.--
                Proceeds of more than $5,000 from a wager''.
            (2) Paragraph (5) of section 3402(q) of such Code (relating 
        to exemption for bingo, keno, and slot machines) is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``proceeds from a wagering 
                transaction in a parimutuel pool with respect to horse 
                races, dog races, or jai alai, and'' after ``shall not 
                apply to'', and
                    (B) by inserting ``certain parimutuel pools,'' 
                before ``bingo'' in the heading thereof.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```