alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-147866, No. 333-135822, No. 333-117885, No. 333-127716, No. 333-32161, No. 333-57573, No. 333-86091, No. 333-45736, No. 333-67480,No. 333-97541 and No. 333-107700) of IRIDEX Corporation of our report dated March 30, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule for the year ended December 30, 2006, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

SanJose, California 

April 1, 2009
#### § 111.79-13 Different voltages and power types.

If receptacle outlets on a vessel are supplied by different voltages (e.g., 110 volts and 220 volts) or by different types of power (e.g., AC and DC), each receptacle outlet must preclude the plugging of a portable device into a receptacle outlet of an incompatible voltage or type of power.

[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28283, June 4, 1996]
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware 

corporation, and FORD GLOBAL

TECHNOLOGIES LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

THERMOANALYTICS, INC., a Michigan 

corporation,

Defendant.

 / 

Case No. 14-cv-13992 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

R. STEVEN WHALEN

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [75] AND 

ORDERING A NEW RESPONSE BRIEF TO BE FILED

On April 8, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their brief in response to Defendant’s 

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See Dkt. No. 75. “The text of a brief 

supporting a motion or response, including footnotes and signatures, may not 

exceed 25 pages.” L.R. 7.1(d)(3)(A). “In this Court, a party must set forth its 

version of the facts that support or contradict a dispositive motion . . . within the 

supporting brief (i.e., within the 25-page limit).” End Product Results, LLC v. 

Dental USA, Inc., No. 12-11546, 2014 WL 4861647, at *4 (E.D. Mich. September 

30, 2014). Plaintiffs’ brief purports to be twenty-four (24) pages, however this 

2:14-cv-13992-GAD-RSW Doc # 76 Filed 04/12/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2085
-2-

page count does not include the fourteen (14) page section entitled, “Counter 

Statement of Undisputed Facts.” Therefore, when counted properly, Plaintiffs’ 

brief is actually thirty-eight (38) pages. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Response Brief is 

STRICKEN for failing to comply with Local Rule 7.1(d)(3)(A). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a new response brief that complies with 

the Local Rules shall be filed by Monday, April 18, 2016. 

Dated: April 12, 2016 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

Detroit, MI HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

 United States District Court Judge

2:14-cv-13992-GAD-RSW Doc # 76 Filed 04/12/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2086
§ 73.735-302 Support of department programs. ( a ) When a Department program is based on law, Executive Order or regulation, every employee has a positive obligation to make it function as efficiently and economically as possible and to support it as long as it is a part of recognized public policy. An employee may, therefore, properly make an address explaining and interpreting such a program, citing its achievements, defending it against uninformed or unjust criticism, or soliciting views for improving it.
( b ) An employee shall not, either directly or indirectly, use appropriated funds to influence, or attempt to influence, a Member of Congress to favor or oppose legislation. However, when authorized by his or her supervisor, an employee is not prohibited from: ( 1 ) Testifying, on request, as a representative of the Department on pending legislation or proposals before Congressional Committees; or
( 2 ) Assisting Congressional Committees in drafting bills or reports on request, when it is clear that the employee is serving solely as a technical expert under the direction of committee leadership.
( c ) All employees shall be familiar with regulations and published instructions that relate to their official duties and responsibilities and shall comply with those directives. This includes carrying out proper orders from officials authorized to give them.
( d ) Employees are required to assist the Inspector General and other investigative officials in the performance of their duties or functions. This requirement includes the giving of statements or evidence to investigators of the Inspector General's office or other HHS investigators authorized to conduct investigations into potential violations.
#### § 137.320 Vessels holding a valid load line certificate.

A drydock and internal structural examination performed for a towing vessel to maintain a valid load line certificate issued in accordance with subchapter E of this chapter would count as an examination required under § 137.300.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11119 Conference Calendar

LOWELL RUSSELL PUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-1901-G

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lowell Russell Pugh, Jr., Dallas County prisoner #98042452, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Pugh moves to supplement the record on appeal; his motion is DENIED. Pugh contends that he was denied a copy of his police report in violation of his constitutionally protected rights and Texas state law; that police violated his constitutionally protected rights by failing to investigate individuals other thanNo. 98-11119 -2-

himself; and that he was deprived of access to the courts because he was not allowed to use the jail law library. To the extent that Pugh sought expungement of his records in his complaint, the district court should have abstained from addressing Pugh’s claims, as his state-court prosecution was ongoing. Younger v. Harris , 401 U.S. 37, 56 (1971). Regarding Pugh’s claims for damages, we have reviewed Pugh’s brief and the record and we find no nonfrivolous appellate issues. Accordingly, Pugh’s appeal is dismissed as frivolous. The dismissal of Pugh’s complaint and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous count as two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Pugh that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 99.2








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dinesh C. Jain, Chief Financial Officer of each of Coaxial LLC, Coaxial Financing Corp. and Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLC
(collectively, the Registrants), hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrants for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrants.











/s/


Name: Dinesh C. Jain


Title: Chief Financial Officer








Subscribed and
sworn to


before me on


August 14, 2002.








/s/


Notary Public
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1960 

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. JONES, Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. ROONEY, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Death Tax 

5 Repeal Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE TAX MADE PERMANENT. 

7 Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

8 Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to title V of 

9 such Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### § 112.43-5 Controls on island type vessels.

On an island type vessel, such as a containership, emergency lights for illumination of survival craft launching operations must be controlled from a central location within the island nearest the launching operations or from the navigating bridge.

[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15267, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28287, June 4, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10979-10980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1170]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Closed Meeting

    Date and Time: Tuesday, March 13, 2007, 2-4 p.m.
    Place: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.
    Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating

[[Page 10980]]

to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. They 
will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as 
well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options 
in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed 
because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be 
properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy 
under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)) or would 
disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely 
to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. 
(5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(B)). In addition, part of the discussion will relate 
solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG 
or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and 
(6)).
    Contact Person for More Information: Persons interested in 
obtaining more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-
4545.

    Dated: March 8, 2007.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-1170 Filed 3-8-07; 12:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>
COMPANY NAME                                                  PLACE OF INCORPORATION
------------                                                  ----------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Applied Graphics Technologies, Inc. ........................  Delaware
Agile Enterprise, Inc. .....................................  Delaware
Color Control, Inc. ........................................  Delaware
Devon Group, Inc. ..........................................  Delaware
  Black Dot Graphics, Inc. .................................  Illinois
     Typo-Graphics, Inc. ...................................  Florida
     ABD Group, Inc. .......................................  Illinois
     Orent GraphicArts, Inc. ...............................  Nebraska
     Ambrosi & Associates, Inc. ............................  Delaware
     Meridian Retail, Inc. .................................  Nebraska
     Taproot Interactive, Inc. .............................  Delaware
     Proof Positive/Farrowlyne Associates, Inc. ............  Delaware
     One 2 One, Inc. .......................................  Delaware
     West Coast Creative, Inc. .............................  California
     Retail Profit Solutions, Inc. .........................  Delaware
Applied Graphics Technologies (UK) Limited..................  United Kingdom
  Wace Group Limited........................................  United Kingdom
     Wace UK Holdings Limited...............................  United Kingdom
       Wace Group Services Limited..........................  United Kingdom
     Gallions Estates Ltd...................................  United Kingdom
     Wace Corporate Packaging Limited.......................  United Kingdom
     Wace Overseas Investments Limited......................  United Kingdom
       Reprographie Wace Group GmbH.........................  Germany
       Seven Worldwide Inc. ................................  Delaware
          WUSA Re, Inc. ....................................  Illinois
          R.E. Graphics, Inc. ..............................  Delaware
       Seven Worldwide Australia Pty Limited................  Australia
          Seven Sydney Pty Ltd..............................  Australia
     Seven Worldwide Limited................................  United Kingdom
       Wace (Wiltshire) Ltd.................................  United Kingdom
</Table>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Trustees of the SHEET METAL 

WORKERS LOCAL NO. 292 

PENSION FUND, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:14-cv-12797 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

ELEKTRO-ION, INC., a Michigan corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 / 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

 

 Based upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment and Brief filed in 

support thereof; and the pleadings previously filed in this matter; the Court, being 

fully apprised in the premises, has concluded that, pursuant to FRCP 55(b)(2), 

Plaintiffs are entitled to default judgment against Defendant ELEKTRO-ION, INC. 

for the relief prayed for in their Complaint. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

 1. Defendant ELEKTRO-ION, INC. is bound to pay contributions to 

Plaintiffs as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 

2:14-cv-12797-MFL-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 78
2

 2. Plaintiffs have and recover Judgment from defendant ELEKTROION, INC. in the amount of $76,021.62,1

 and plaintiffs shall have execution 

therefor. 

 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT post-judgment interest will 

accrue on the amount set forth in paragraph 2 as provided for in 28 U.S.C. §1961, 

and plaintiffs shall have execution therefor. 

4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of 

enforcement of the provisions of this Default Judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: October 8, 2014 

 

1

The amount of $76,021.62 is the sum of $60,485.83 (representing unpaid audited 

contributions for the period of January 2012 through December 2013) to which 

plaintiffs are entitled pursuant to ERISA 502(g)(2)(A); $1,895.67 in interest on the 

delinquent contributions, to which plaintiffs are entitled pursuant to ERISA 

502(g)(2)(B); $3,024.29 to which plaintiffs are entitled pursuant to ERISA 

502(g)(2)(C), which is the greater of interest on the audited contributions and 

liquidated damages provided for under the plan; $5,514.83 in late payment 

assessment pursuant to plaintiffs’ plan documents; $3,045.00 in audit costs 

pursuant to plaintiffs’ plan documents; and $2,056.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs 

through August 31, 2014, to which plaintiffs are entitled pursuant to ERISA 

502(g)(2)(D) and plaintiffs’ plan documents.

2:14-cv-12797-MFL-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 79
3

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on October 8, 2014, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-12797-MFL-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 80
2:14-cr-20676-MAG-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 10/17/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 68
2:14-cr-20676-MAG-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 10/17/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 69
2:14-cr-20676-MAG-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 10/17/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 70
§ 114.800 Approved equipment and material. ( a ) Equipment and material that is required by this subchapter to be approved or of an approved type, must have been manufactured and approved in accordance with the design and testing requirements in subchapter Q (Equipment, Construction, and Materials: Specifications and Approval) of this chapter or as otherwise specified by the Commandant.
( b ) Coast Guard publication COMDTINST M16714.3 (Series) “Equipment Lists, Items Approved, Certificated or Accepted under Marine Inspection and Navigation Laws,” lists approved equipment by type and manufacturer. COMDTINST M16714.3 (Series) may be obtained from New Orders, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 885, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51348, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 75.381 Closeout. The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity will close-out the Federal award when it determines that all applicable administrative actions and all required work of the Federal award have been completed by the non-Federal entity. This section specifies the actions the non-Federal entity and HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity must take to complete this process at the end of the period of performance. ( a ) The non-Federal entity must submit, no later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance, all financial, performance, and other reports as required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity may approve extensions when requested by the non-Federal entity.
( b ) Unless the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity authorizes an extension, a non-Federal entity must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Federal award not later than 90 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
( c ) The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity must make prompt payments to the non-Federal entity for allowable reimbursable costs under the Federal award being closed out.
( d ) The non-Federal entity must promptly refund any balances of unobligated cash that the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity paid in advance or paid and that are not authorized to be retained by the non-Federal entity for use in other projects. See OMB Circular A-129 and see § 75.391 for requirements regarding unreturned amounts that become delinquent debts.
( e ) Consistent with the terms and conditions of the Federal award, the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity must make a settlement for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs after closeout reports are received.
( f ) The non-Federal entity must account for any real and personal property acquired with Federal funds or received from the Federal Government in accordance with §§ 75.317 through 75.323 and 75.343.
( g ) The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity should complete all closeout actions for Federal awards no later than 180 calendar days after receipt and acceptance of all required final reports.
§ 122.202 Notice of marine casualty. ( a ) Immediately after addressing resultant safety concerns, the owner, agent, master, or person in charge of a vessel involved in a marine casualty shall notify the nearest Sector Office, Marine Inspection Office, or Coast Guard Group Office whenever a vessel is involved in a marine casualty consisting of: ( 1 ) An unintended grounding, or an unintended strike of (allision with) a bridge:
( 2 ) An intended grounding, or an intended strike of a bridge, that creates a hazard to navigation, the environment, or the safety of a vessel, or that meets any criterion of paragraphs (a)(3) through (a)(7) of this section;
( 3 ) Loss of main propulsion or primary steering, or any associated component or control system, that reduces the maneuverability of the vessel;
( 4 ) An occurrence materially and adversely affecting the vessel's seaworthiness or fitness for service or route, including but not limited to fire, flooding, failure of or damage to fixed fire extinguishing systems, lifesaving equipment, auxiliary power generating equipment, or bilge pumping systems;
( 5 ) Loss of life;
( 6 ) Injury that requires professional medical treatment (treatment beyond first aid) and, if the person is engaged or employed on board a vessel in commercial service, which renders the individual unfit to perform his or her routine duties; or
( 7 ) An occurrence not meeting any of the above criteria but causing property damage in excess of $25,000. This damage includes the cost of labor and material to restore the property to its condition before the occurrence, but does not include the cost of salvage, cleaning, gas freeing, drydocking, or demurrage.
( b ) A vessel is excluded from the requirements of paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6) of this section with respect to the death or injury of shipyard or harbor workers when such accidents are not the result of either a vessel casualty (e.g., collision) or a vessel equipment casualty (e.g., cargo boom failure) and are subject to the reporting requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 1904.
( c ) Notice given as required by § 122.203 satisfies the requirement of this section if the marine casualty involves a hazardous condition.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36330, July 2, 2007]
#### § 115.816 Miscellaneous systems and equipment.

At each initial and subsequent inspection for certification the owner or managing operator shall be prepared to test and make available for inspection all items in the ship's outfit, such as ground tackle, navigation lights and equipment, markings, and placards, which are required to be carried by the regulations in this subchapter, as necessary to determine that they are fit for the service intended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRYANT BENTLEY,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-13618

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

CORIZON HEALTH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is a report and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge

David R. Grand on February 25, 2015. No objections have been filed by the

parties. The court having fully reviewed the matter;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is

ADOPTED as the court’s findings and conclusions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE, consistent with the report and recommendation. 

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: March 25, 2015

5:14-cv-13618-JCO-DRG Doc # 19 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 117
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the

parties of record on this date, March 25, 2015, using the ECF system and/or

ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

-2-

5:14-cv-13618-JCO-DRG Doc # 19 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 118
#### § 630.210 To whom must I distribute my drug-free workplace statement?

You must require that a copy of the statement described in § 630.205 be given to each employee who will be engaged in the performance of any Federal award.