Electric Melt Furnace 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Fibertek Insulation, LLC 

Lakeland Plant 

2222 West Bellavista Street 

Lakeland, Florida 33810 

Project No. 10-3990.21 

January 4, 2011 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the West Electric Melt Furnace 

Baghouse located at the Fibertek Insulation, LLC (Fibertek) plant in Lakeland, Florida: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the 

overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

ii

Table I 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour)

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 2.2E-01 1.2E-01 1.5E+01 

Organic 

Condensable 

PM2.5

 8.1E-02 4.4E-02 5.7E+00 

Inorganic 

Condensable 

PM2.5

 3.0E-02 1.6E-02 2.1E+00 

Baghouse October 12 

& 13, 2010 

Total PM2.5 3.3E-01 1.8E-01 2.3E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate 8.2E-01 4.4E-01 5.7E+01 

Antimony < 2.9E-06 1.6E-06 2.0E-04 

Arsenic 3.8E-06 2.1E-06 2.6E-04 

Beryllium < 7.2E-07 3.9E-07 5.0E-05 

Cadmium 3.7E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03 

Chromium 2.8E-05 1.5E-05 1.9E-03 

Cobalt 3.9E-06 2.1E-06 2.7E-04 

Lead 2.9E-05 1.5E-05 2.0E-03 

Manganese 2.1E-05 1.1E-05 1.4E-03 

Nickel 2.6E-05 1.4E-05 1.8E-03 

Baghouse October 12 

& 13, 2010 

Selenium 3.6E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03 

Baghouse October 15, 

2010 Mercury 2.5E-06 1.4E-06 1.9E-04 

Baghouse October 13 

& 14, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium 5.9E-06 3.2E-06 4.2E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01 

Baghouse October 13, 

2010 Hydrogen 

Fluoride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions.
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 1

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 1 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 3 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 3 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 3 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 4 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Emissions Test Results Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Production Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the West Electric Melt Furnace 

Baghouse located at the Fibertek Insulation, LLC (Fibertek) plant in Lakeland, Florida: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on 

October 12, 13, 14, and 15, 2010. The test program consisted of emission tests at one exhaust 

stack for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program included the 

personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Sam Morris Metco Environmental 

Daniel Moore Metco Environmental 

Will Starkey Metco Environmental 

Jason LaCroix Metco Environmental 

Tom Osborn Fibertek Insulation 

2.0 Process Description

Glass and cullet are fed to two electric steel shell furnaces and melted to be formed into 

fiberglass. The emissions test program evaluated emissions from the West Electric Steel Sheel 

Furnace. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, the electric melt furnace was operated at slightly above 

normal operating conditions. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control 

and/or additional production information will be available to the U.S. EPA on request. 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

2

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into six 

categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

and, 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.6, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

Method 1: “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

Method 2: “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

Method 3A: “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions 

from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

Method 4: “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a 

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

3

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger). 

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM2.5

particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass 

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC 

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a 

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, 

and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. 

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid 

(HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals 

sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon 

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case 

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty 

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica 

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

4

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a 

glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length 

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the 

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 

sampling train is provided as Figure 6. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

5

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour)

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 2.2E-01 1.2E-01 1.5E+01 

Organic 

Condensable 

PM2.5

 8.1E-02 4.4E-02 5.7E+00 

Inorganic 

Condensable 

PM2.5

 3.0E-02 1.6E-02 2.1E+00 

Baghouse October 12 

& 13, 2010 

Total PM2.5 3.3E-01 1.8E-01 2.3E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate 8.2E-01 4.4E-01 5.7E+01 

Antimony < 2.9E-06 1.6E-06 2.0E-04 

Arsenic 3.8E-06 2.1E-06 2.6E-04 

Beryllium < 7.2E-07 3.9E-07 5.0E-05 

Cadmium 3.7E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03 

Chromium 2.8E-05 1.5E-05 1.9E-03 

Cobalt 3.9E-06 2.1E-06 2.7E-04 

Lead 2.9E-05 1.5E-05 2.0E-03 

Manganese 2.1E-05 1.1E-05 1.4E-03 

Nickel 2.6E-05 1.4E-05 1.8E-03 

Baghouse October 12 

& 13, 2010 

Selenium 3.6E-05 2.0E-05 2.5E-03 

Baghouse October 15, 

2010 Mercury 2.5E-06 1.4E-06 1.9E-04 

Baghouse October 13 

& 14, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium 5.9E-06 3.2E-06 4.2E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01 

Baghouse October 13, 

2010 Hydrogen 

Fluoride < 2.4E-03 1.3E-03 1.7E-01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Fibertek Insulation, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.21 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 4, 2011 

6

Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process 

production data is included in Appendix B. Field and computer-generated data sheets are 

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes 

laboratory analytical reports. 

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Isolatek International. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent 

except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES 
diameter = 18"

Points Distance "

12 0.4

11 1.2

10 2.1

9 3.2

8 4.5

7 6.4

6 11.6

5 13.5

4 14.8

3 15.9

2 16.8

1 17.6

Figure 1

Site:

Fibertek Insulation

Lakeland, Florida

Electric Melt Furnace Baghouse

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

> 9"

 > 36"
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Fibertek Insulation, LLC

Lakeland, Florida

Electric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 3

Site:USEPA OTM27/28Fibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environmen

2615 Wolcott 

Mic

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Tef

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure 4

Site:

USEPA Method 5/29

Fibertek Insulation, LLC

Lakeland, Florida

Electric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott

Ferndale, Michigan

Pump

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner & nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

Probe

Filter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution Empty Silica Gel
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainFibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environm

26

Ferndale

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 0061Fibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environm

261

Fern

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainFibertek Insulation, LLCLakeland, FloridaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environm

26

Fern

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
APPENDIX A 

Detailed Test Run Results 
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 4 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/13/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:20:00 14:55:00 12:50:00

Run Finish Time 13:30:54 18:54:05 16:54:45

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240.70 239.56 240.47 240

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.803 0.803 0.803 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.00 30.01 30.01

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 85.423 87.530 84.573 85.842

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 80.75 90.75 87.21 86.24

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 83.899 84.379 82.084 83.454

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 67.4 49.6 48.2 55.1

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.17 2.33 2.27 2.59

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.6 2.7 2.7 3.0

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.964 0.973 0.973 0.970

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.39 1.46 1.45 1.43

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.51 20.48 20.50 20.50

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.1 78.06 78.05 78.1

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.04 29.05 29.05 29.05

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.64 28.76 28.75 28.72

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.8 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.94 29.95 29.95

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 148 148 148 148

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.460 0.458 0.460 0.459

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.0 38.9 39.0 39.0

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,784 3,764 3,792 3,780

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,475 4,490 4,483 4,483

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.1 103.8 100.3 102.4

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 34.80 35.10 38.30 36.07

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E+01 1.5E+01 1.6E+01 1.5E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.1E-01 2.1E-01 2.3E-01 2.2E-01

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 6.0 31.0 4.0 13.7

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E+00 1.3E+01 1.7E+00 5.7E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.6E-02 1.8E-01 2.4E-02 8.1E-02

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E+00 2.1E+00 1.7E+00 2.1E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.6E-02 3.0E-02 2.4E-02 3.0E-02

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 46.8 71.1 46.3 54.7

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.0E+01 3.0E+01 2.0E+01 2.3E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-01 4.2E-01 2.8E-01 3.3E-01

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

FIBERTEK 10-3990.21

Lakeland Ca

Source Baghouse

Personnel Morris
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/13/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:20:00 14:45:00 8:10:00

Run Finish Time 13:30:00 18:55:00 12:15:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 240

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.808 0.808 0.808 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.00 30.01 30.01

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.96 0.89 1.26 1.03

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 151.646 149.610 150.755 150.670

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 99.42 106.43 97.98 101.27

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 142.889 139.157 142.522 141.522

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 93.4 86.7 92.7 90.9

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.40 4.08 4.36 4.28

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.9

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.970 0.972 0.970 0.971

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.39 1.46 1.47 1.44

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.51 20.48 20.61 20.53

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.1 78.06 77.92 78.0

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.04 29.05 29.06 29.05

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.71 28.74 28.73 28.73

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.8 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.94 29.95 29.95

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 149 149 148 149

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.471 0.486 0.456 0.471

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.8 40.5 39.1 39.8

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,923 3,860 3,792 3,858

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,657 4,584 4,495 4,579

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.3 94.1 99.3 97.2

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 216.4 198.3 267.2 227.3

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 53.5 50.3 66.2 56.7

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.77 0.74 0.94 0.82

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.9E-06 3.0E-06 2.8E-06 2.9E-06

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 1.27 0.82 1.09 1.06

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 3.1E-04 2.1E-04 2.7E-04 2.6E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-06 3.1E-06 3.8E-06 3.8E-06

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.9E-05 5.1E-05 5.0E-05 5.0E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.1E-07 7.5E-07 7.0E-07 7.2E-07

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 25.39 3.71 1.73 10.28

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 6.3E-03 9.4E-04 4.3E-04 2.5E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 9.1E-05 1.4E-05 6.1E-06 3.7E-05

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 12.18 6.45 4.46 7.70

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.0E-03 1.6E-03 1.1E-03 1.9E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.4E-05 2.4E-05 1.6E-05 2.8E-05

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 1.46 1.13 0.63 1.07

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-04 2.9E-04 1.6E-04 2.7E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.2E-06 4.2E-06 2.2E-06 3.9E-06

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 12.9 6.36 4.51 7.92

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 3.2E-03 1.6E-03 1.1E-03 2.0E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.6E-05 2.4E-05 1.6E-05 2.9E-05

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 7.6 4.9 4.9 5.8

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03 1.4E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.7E-05 1.8E-05 1.7E-05 2.1E-05

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 8.84 8.34 4.34 7.17

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-03 2.1E-03 1.1E-03 1.8E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.2E-05 3.1E-05 1.5E-05 2.6E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 9.7 9.4 11 10.0

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E-03 2.4E-03 2.7E-03 2.5E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.5E-05 3.5E-05 3.9E-05 3.6E-05

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

FIBERTEK 10-286C

LAKELAND, FL

Source BAGHOUSE

Personnel MOORE
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Fibertek Insulation, LLC Lakeland Florida Electric Melt Furnaces West Baghouse Stack Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data F

BDL

1 10/15/2010 8:00 10/15/2010 10:00 1.82E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2 10/15/2010 10:20 10/15/2010 12:15 2.01E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 10/15/2010 12:40 10/15/2010 14:40 1.85E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Em

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volum

Differenc

#DIV/0! 3.4 1.47 20.54 4,495 3,542 149.68

Flow data is the average from all isokinetic test runs R1, B 22 0 22 0 22 0.12 

#DIV/0! 3.4 1.41 20.39 4,495 3,542 149.8

Flow data is the average from all isokinetic test runs R2, B 24 0 24 0 24 0.12 

#DIV/0! 3.4 1.32 19.61 4,495 3,542 150

Flow data is the average from all isokinetic test runs R3, B 22 0.7 22.7 0 22.7 0.12 

Trap #1

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C

0.18

R1, A 43.0 0.20 43.20 20 23.2 0.12 1% 0

0.19

0.0 3 

0.20

R2, A 40.0 0.00 40.00 20 20 0.12 1% 0

0.17

0.0 9 

0.19

R3, A 41.0 0.90 41.90 20 21.9 0.12 1% 2

0.18

0.0 2 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) 

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/13/2010 10/14/2010 10/14/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:50:00 8:25:00 12:55:00

Run Finish Time 16:55:00 12:30:00 17:00:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 240

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.231 0.231 0.231 0.231

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.806 0.806 0.806 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.00 29.99 30.00

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.94 0.95 0.94 0.94

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 147.232 146.648 147.370 147.083

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 99.54 91.32 97.28 96.05

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 138.693 140.158 139.293 139.382

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 161.6 179.1 110.1 150.3

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.61 8.43 5.18 7.07

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 5.2 5.7 3.6 4.8

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.948 0.943 0.964 0.952

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.45 1.56 1.35 1.45

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.50 20.59 20.54 20.54

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.05 77.85 78.11 78.0

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.05 29.07 29.04 29.05

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.48 28.44 28.64 28.52

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.8 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.94 29.93 29.94

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 147 147 147 147

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.455 0.457 0.456 0.456

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.1 39.2 39.0 39.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,698 3,710 3,765 3,724

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,505 4,494 4,488 4,496

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 102.8 104.8 102.1 103.2

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 3.8 0.8 0.4 1.7

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 9.7E-04 2.0E-04 1.0E-04 4.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-05 2.8E-06 1.4E-06 5.9E-06

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

FIBERTEK 10-286C

LAKELAND, FL

Source BAGHOUSE

Personnel MORRIS
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/13/2010 10/13/2010 10/13/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:19:00 17:21:00 19:00:00

Run Finish Time 10:45:00 18:25:00 20:05:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.808 0.808 0.808 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.01 30.01 30.01 30.01

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.48 1.49 1.49 1.49

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 42.779 42.085 43.408 42.757

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 80.25 90.25 87.92 86.14

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 42.171 40.734 42.193 41.699

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 31 24.7 25.4 27.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.46 1.16 1.20 1.27

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.3 2.8 2.8 3.0

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.967 0.972 0.972 0.970

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.47 1.49 1.43 1.46

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.61 20.44 20.47 20.51

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 77.92 78.07 78.1 78.0

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.06 29.06 29.05 29.05

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.69 28.75 28.74 28.73

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.80 -0.80 -0.80 -0.80

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.95 29.95 29.95 29.95

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 148 148 148 148

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.453 0.453 0.454 0.453

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.9 38.9 39.0 39.0

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,787 3,764 3,793 3,781

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,479 4,480 4,489 4,483

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.0 96.2 99.9 99.0

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.4E-03 2.5E-03 2.4E-03 2.4E-03

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01 1.7E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.4E-03 2.5E-03 2.4E-03 2.4E-03

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

FIBERTEK 10-286-C

LAKELAND, FL

Source BAGHOUSE

Personnel STARKEY
APPENDIX B 

Production Data 
APPENDIX C 

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and 

Notes 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 53-1 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12

Location Lakeland Ca Rate (cfm) 0.349 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 20.06Source Baghouse Delta ∆H@ Date 10/12/10 Time/reading 20.06Operator Morris Bws (%) 3.64 # of Ports 2 Total Run min 240.70Filter Number Condensate Volume 50.7 Cp 0.803 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 16.7 DGM Y 1.002 Pm (in Hg) 30.01 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.178 O2 (%) 20.51 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00017 CO2 (%) 1.39 Md 29.04 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.64 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,490 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 83.66 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 84.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,906

Moisture % 3.65 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,764

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments:

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 16.8 9:20 449.56 0.32 148 75 76 0.00 0.35 2

5 16.8 36.0 9:36 455.97 0.42 147 77 75 0.00 0.35 24 36.0 56.2 9:56 463.18 0.46 148 78 77 0.00 0.35 23 56.2 77.8 10:16 470.62 0.53 148 80 77 0.00 0.35 22 77.8 98.8 10:37 478.55 0.50 149 81 79 0.00 0.35 21 98.8 119.8 10:58 485.92 0.50 148 80 80 0.00 0.35 2

1 119.8 136.9 11:30 493.97 0.33 146 81 80 0.00 0.35 22 136.9 155.9 11:47 500.21 0.41 147 81 81 0.00 0.35 23 155.9 175.1 12:06 506.70 0.42 148 84 82 0.00 0.35 24 175.1 195.7 12:25 512.38 0.48 148 86 85 0.00 0.35 25 195.7 217.7 12:45 520.81 0.55 147 86 84 0.00 0.35 26 217.7 240.7 13:07 527.54 0.60 147 88 85 0.00 0.35 2

240.7 13:30 534.99

Average: 85.42 0.46 147.6 81.4 80.1 0.00 0.35 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 53-1 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12

Location Lakeland Ca Rate (cfm) 0.351 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 20.0Source Baghouse Delta ∆H@ Date 10/12/10 Time/reading 20.0Operator Starkey Bws (%) 2.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run 239.6Filter Number Condensate Volume 35.6 Cp 0.803 Ps (in Hg) 29.94Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 14 DGM Y 1.002 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.178 O2 (%) 20.48 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00017 CO2 (%) 1.46 Md 29.05 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.76 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,475 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 84.14 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 84.1 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,889

Moisture % 2.70 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,784

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 16.2 14:55 535.80 0.30 147 90 93 0.00 0.35 2

5 16.2 35.9 15:11 542.64 0.44 148 88 90 0.00 0.35 24 35.9 55.1 15:30 549.89 0.42 148 87 93 0.00 0.35 23 55.1 76.6 15:50 557.14 0.53 148 88 93 0.00 0.35 22 76.6 97.5 16:11 565.58 0.50 150 94 93 0.00 0.35 21 97.5 120.5 16:32 574.26 0.60 149 91 93 0.00 0.35 2

6 120.5 137.5 16:55 581.89 0.33 147 94 94 0.00 0.35 25 137.5 157.1 17:12 587.80 0.44 148 92 93 0.00 0.35 24 157.1 176.8 17:31 595.87 0.44 147 90 89 0.00 0.35 23 176.8 198.1 17:51 603.11 0.52 148 89 90 0.00 0.35 22 198.1 218.6 18:12 610.12 0.48 149 91 85 0.00 0.35 21 218.6 239.6 18:33 618.84 0.50 148 92 86 0.00 0.35 2

239.6 18:54 623.33

Average: 87.53 0.46 148.1 90.5 91.0 0.00 0.35 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port Start Finish Pre P

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 53-1 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12

Location Lakeland Ca Rate (cfm) 0.342 Run # 4 Time/pt (min) 20.0Source Baghouse Delta ∆H@ Date 10/13/10 Time/reading 20.0Operator Starkey Bws (%) 2.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.5Filter Number Condensate Volume 30 Cp 0.803 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18.2 DGM Y 1.002 Pm (in Hg) 30.01 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.178 O2 (%) 20.50 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00017 CO2 (%) 1.45 Md 29.05 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.75 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,483 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 81.85 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 82.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,897

Moisture % 2.70 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,792

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 16.3 12:50 679.66 0.30 147 83 85 0.00 0.35 2

2 16.3 35.7 13:06 685.69 0.43 148 84 86 0.00 0.35 23 35.7 55.2 13:25 693.14 0.43 149 88 85 0.00 0.35 24 55.2 76.5 13:45 700.20 0.52 149 84 85 0.00 0.35 25 76.5 97.9 14:06 707.68 0.52 148 87 86 0.00 0.35 26 97.9 120.7 14:27 714.98 0.59 147 88 87 0.00 0.35 2

1 120.7 138.0 14:55 722.70 0.34 147 90 87 0.00 0.35 22 138.0 157.5 15:12 729.16 0.43 148 87 87 0.00 0.35 23 157.5 177.1 15:31 735.65 0.44 148 90 88 0.00 0.35 24 177.1 198.5 15:51 743.10 0.52 149 91 87 0.00 0.35 25 198.5 219.1 16:12 750.98 0.48 148 91 88 0.00 0.35 26 219.1 240.5 16:33 758.83 0.52 148 91 88 0.00 0.35 2

240.5 16:54 764.23

Average: 84.57 0.46 148.0 87.8 86.6 0.00 0.35 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286C Probe # 30-3-2 Pollutant Metals Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 50-2 Method 29 Total Points 12 9:20 13:30 20.0/0.000 10.0/0.002

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.896 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 20.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 0.959 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MOORE Bws (%) 2.98 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 67.1 Cp 0.808 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 26.3 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 30.13 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.235 O2 (%) 20.51 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00030 CO2 (%) 1.39 Md 29.04 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.60 Ms 28.71 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,584 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 142.28 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.23 Total Vol.(cf) 215.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,979

Moisture % 3.00 Preliminary Ts (oF) 179 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.6 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,860

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3390 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 5.0 9:20 675.176 0.50 148 84 80 0.70 1.1 250 

1 5.0 10.0 9:25 678.79 0.50 149 85 80 0.70 1.1 259 1 10.0 15.0 9:30 682.52 0.50 148 90 80 0.70 1.1 258 1 15.0 20.0 9:35 685.63 0.50 148 93 83 0.70 1.1 260 2 20.0 25.0 9:40 689.32 0.52 149 98 83 0.73 1.15 266 2 25.0 30.0 9:45 692.86 0.52 148 100 84 0.73 1.15 263 2 30.0 35.0 9:50 696.11 0.52 148 104 87 0.73 1.15 261 2 35.0 40.0 9:55 699.91 0.52 148 102 86 0.73 1.15 260 3 40.0 45.0 10:00 703.23 0.48 149 103 89 0.68 1 261 3 45.0 50.0 10:05 706.51 0.48 150 102 88 0.68 1 260 3 50.0 55.0 10:10 709.7 0.48 149 105 90 0.68 1 261 3 55.0 60.0 10:15 712.86 0.48 149 107 90 0.68 1 262 4 60.0 65.0 10:20 716.18 0.48 149 106 90 0.68 1 263 4 65.0 70.0 10:25 719.58 0.48 148 105 91 0.68 1 261 4 70.0 75.0 10:30 722.47 0.50 149 106 90 0.70 1 262 4 75.0 80.0 10:35 726.3 0.50 149 106 90 0.70 1.1 263 5 80.0 85.0 10:40 729.81 0.45 151 103 93 0.63 0.96 261 5 85.0 90.0 10:45 733.37 0.45 151 104 92 0.63 0.96 260 5 90.0 95.0 10:50 736.14 0.45 150 104 92 0.63 0.96 261 5 95.0 100.0 10:55 739.35 0.45 150 104 92 0.63 0.96 262 6 100.0 105.0 11:00 743.29 0.38 147 101 93 0.53 0.86 261 6 105.0 110.0 11:05 745.45 0.38 148 101 93 0.53 0.86 260 6 110.0 115.0 11:10 748.38 0.35 149 102 93 0.49 0.78 259 6 115.0 120.0 11:15 751.35 0.35 149 102 93 0.49 0.78 260 1 120.0 125.0 11:30 753.90 0.55 150 103 95 0.77 1.2 262 1 125.0 130.0 11:35 757.53 0.55 149 103 95 0.77 1 261 1 130.0 135.0 11:40 760.87 0.55 149 103 95 0.77 1 262 1 135.0 140.0 11:45 764.34 0.55 149 103 96 0.77 1 261 2 140.0 145.0 11:50 767.78 0.52 148 107 93 0.73 0.94 260 2 145.0 150.0 11:55 770.08 0.52 149 109 93 0.73 0.94 261 2 150.0 155.0 12:00 773.30 0.52 149 109 93 0.73 0.94 262 2 155.0 160.0 12:05 776.64 0.52 149 109 94 0.73 0.94 260 3 160.0 165.0 12:10 779.00 0.50 150 112 95 0.70 0.9 261 3 165.0 170.0 12:15 782.64 0.50 150 112 96 0.70 0.9 260 3 170.0 175.0 12:20 785.40 0.50 151 112 94 0.70 0.9 261 3 175.0 180.0 12:25 788.55 0.50 150 114 95 0.70 0.9 261 4 180.0 185.0 12:30 791.39 0.45 148 113 95 0.63 0.8 262 4 185.0 190.0 12:35 794.24 0.45 148 113 96 0.63 0.8 261 4 190.0 195.0 12:40 796.82 0.48 149 114 99 0.68 0.88 262 4 195.0 200.0 12:45 800.46 0.48 149 115 99 0.68 0.88 261 5 200.0 205.0 12:50 803.51 0.45 149 114 99 0.63 0.84 260 5 205.0 210.0 12:55 806.57 0.42 148 115 99 0.59 0.7 261 5 210.0 215.0 13:00 809.23 0.40 149 116 99 0.56 0.76 262 5 215.0 220.0 13:05 812.48 0.40 149 118 99 0.56 0.88 259 6 220.0 225.0 13:10 815.66 0.40 149 118 100 0.56 0.88 261 6 225.0 230.0 13:15 818.73 0.40 149 118 100 0.56 0.88 262 6 230.0 235.0 13:20 821.07 0.40 149 118 100 0.56 0.88 261 6 235.0 240.0 13:25 824.41 0.40 149 118 100 0.56 0.88 262 

240.0 13:30 826.82

Average: 151.65 0.47 149.0 106.3 92.5 0.66 0.96 261 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286C Probe # 30-3-2 Pollutant Metals Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 50-2 Method 29 Total Points 12 14:45 18:55 20.0/0.000 10.0/0.000

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.58 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 20.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 0.888 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MOORE Bws (%) 2.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 51.7 Cp 0.808 Ps (in Hg) 29.94Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 35 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 30.12 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.235 O2 (%) 20.48 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00030 CO2 (%) 1.46 Md 29.05 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.60 Ms 28.74 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,657 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 138.58 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.23 Total Vol.(cf) 139.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 4,038

Moisture % 2.86 Preliminary Ts (oF) 179 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,923

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3388 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 5.0 14:45 828.030 0.50 148 98 95 0.66 0.92 250 

1 5.0 10.0 14:50 831.28 0.50 149 95 93 0.66 0.92 251 1 10.0 15.0 14:55 834.59 0.50 148 97 95 0.66 0.92 250 1 15.0 20.0 15:00 837.83 0.52 148 97 95 0.69 0.96 251 2 20.0 25.0 15:05 841.57 0.54 150 106 95 0.71 1 252 2 25.0 30.0 15:10 844.4 0.54 150 108 96 0.71 1 251 2 30.0 35.0 15:15 847.51 0.54 149 108 96 0.71 1 252 2 35.0 40.0 15:20 850.8 0.54 149 109 96 0.71 1 251 3 40.0 45.0 15:25 854.03 0.52 150 111 96 0.69 0.96 250 3 45.0 50.0 15:30 857.19 0.52 151 111 96 0.69 0.96 251 3 50.0 55.0 15:35 860.38 0.50 150 111 97 0.66 0.92 250 3 55.0 60.0 15:40 863.54 0.50 150 112 97 0.66 0.92 249 4 60.0 65.0 15:45 867.07 0.48 149 117 99 0.63 0.86 251 4 65.0 70.0 15:50 869.94 0.48 149 117 99 0.63 0.86 250 4 70.0 75.0 15:55 872.63 0.48 148 117 99 0.63 0.86 251 4 75.0 80.0 16:00 875.5 0.48 149 117 99 0.63 0.86 251 5 80.0 85.0 16:05 878.36 0.42 148 116 100 0.56 0.78 250 5 85.0 90.0 16:10 881.41 0.42 148 116 102 0.56 0.78 251 5 90.0 95.0 16:15 884.48 0.42 147 116 102 0.56 0.78 251 5 95.0 100.0 16:20 886.72 0.42 147 116 102 0.56 0.78 251 6 100.0 105.0 16:25 889.61 0.38 149 117 102 0.50 0.7 250 6 105.0 110.0 16:30 872.25 0.38 149 117 102 0.50 0.7 251 6 110.0 115.0 16:35 895.18 0.38 150 117 103 0.50 0.7 252 6 115.0 120.0 16:40 897.91 0.40 149 117 102 0.53 0.72 252 1 120.0 125.0 16:55 900.518 0.50 150 115 107 0.66 0.9 251 1 125.0 130.0 17:00 903.690 0.50 149 115 107 0.66 0.9 252 1 130.0 135.0 17:05 906.550 0.50 150 115 107 0.66 0.9 253 1 135.0 140.0 17:10 909.830 0.50 149 115 107 0.66 0.9 252 2 140.0 145.0 17:15 913.820 0.50 148 112 102 0.66 0.9 251 2 145.0 150.0 17:20 916.290 0.50 148 112 102 0.66 0.9 250 2 150.0 155.0 17:25 920.070 0.50 148 112 103 0.66 0.9 251 2 155.0 160.0 17:30 922.780 0.52 149 114 102 0.69 0.96 252 3 160.0 165.0 17:35 926.510 0.52 150 114 102 0.69 0.96 254 3 165.0 170.0 17:40 929.770 0.52 149 114 102 0.69 0.96 255 3 170.0 175.0 17:45 932.810 0.52 149 114 102 0.69 0.96 256 3 175.0 180.0 17:50 937.040 0.52 150 115 102 0.69 0.96 257 4 180.0 185.0 17:55 939.520 0.52 149 115 103 0.69 0.96 258 4 185.0 190.0 18:00 942.950 0.50 151 115 103 0.66 0.9 258 4 190.0 195.0 18:05 945.730 0.50 152 115 103 0.66 0.9 260 4 195.0 200.0 18:10 949.020 0.45 153 113 99 0.60 0.8 261 5 200.0 205.0 18:15 952.760 0.45 151 113 99 0.60 0.8 261 5 205.0 210.0 18:20 954.980 0.48 149 113 98 0.63 0.86 260 5 210.0 215.0 18:25 958.140 0.50 151 113 99 0.66 0.9 260 5 215.0 220.0 18:30 961.070 0.48 149 115 100 0.63 0.86 261 6 220.0 225.0 18:35 963.580 0.48 149 115 100 0.63 0.86 260 6 225.0 230.0 18:40 965.140 0.50 150 116 101 0.66 0.94 261 6 230.0 235.0 18:45 967.240 0.50 151 116 102 0.66 0.94 262 6 235.0 240.0 18:50 972.900 0.50 151 116 102 0.66 0.94 261 

240.0 18:55 977.640

Average: 149.61 0.49 149.4 112.6 100.3 0.64 0.89 253.7 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286C Probe # 30-3-2 Pollutant Metals Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 50-2 Method 29 Total Points 12 8:10 12:15 16.0/0.000 7.5/0.000

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.594 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 20.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 1.26 Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MOORE Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 68.8 Cp 0.808 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 23.9 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 30.13 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.235 O2 (%) 20.61 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00030 CO2 (%) 1.47 Md 29.06 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.60 Ms 28.73 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,495 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 141.80 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.23 Total Vol.(cf) 142.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,908

Moisture % 2.99 Preliminary Ts (oF) 179 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,792

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3390 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 5.0 8:10 979.021 0.59 149 76 75 1.09 1.6 240 

1 5.0 10.0 8:15 983.44 0.60 149 76 75 1.11 1.6 245 1 10.0 15.0 8:20 986.37 0.60 149 78 75 1.11 1.6 248 1 15.0 20.0 8:25 990.46 0.59 149 80 75 1.09 1.6 250 2 20.0 25.0 8:30 994.81 0.53 148 85 77 0.98 1.4 251 2 25.0 30.0 8:35 997.91 0.55 148 90 80 1.02 1.5 252 2 30.0 35.0 8:40 1000.07 0.55 148 94 80 1.02 1.5 255 2 35.0 40.0 8:45 1004.5 0.56 147 99 84 1.03 1.55 253 3 40.0 45.0 8:50 1007.95 0.48 149 102 85 0.89 1.3 257 3 45.0 50.0 8:55 1011.23 0.48 148 103 86 0.89 1.3 255 3 50.0 55.0 9:00 1014.31 0.48 148 105 88 0.89 1.3 256 3 55.0 60.0 9:05 1018.75 0.48 146 105 88 0.89 1.3 255 4 60.0 65.0 9:10 1022.33 0.41 147 106 89 0.76 1.15 256 4 65.0 70.0 9:15 1025.33 0.42 148 108 90 0.78 1.2 250 4 70.0 75.0 9:20 1028.63 0.42 148 108 91 0.78 1.2 251 4 75.0 80.0 9:25 1032.17 0.43 148 110 92 0.79 1.2 253 5 80.0 85.0 9:30 1035.82 0.40 148 110 94 0.74 1.1 255 5 85.0 90.0 9:35 1038.56 0.40 149 111 94 0.74 1.1 256 5 90.0 95.0 9:40 1042.22 0.40 148 111 94 0.74 1.1 252 5 95.0 100.0 9:45 1045.36 0.40 148 112 95 0.74 1.1 253 6 100.0 105.0 9:50 1048.71 0.33 147 112 95 0.61 0.92 255 6 105.0 110.0 9:55 1051.6 0.32 148 112 95 0.59 0.9 254 6 110.0 115.0 10:00 1053.88 0.32 148 110 95 0.59 0.9 252 6 115.0 120.0 10:05 1055.6 0.32 148 111 95 0.59 0.9 251 1 120.0 125.0 10:15 1057.343 0.50 149 99 95 0.92 1.4 258 1 125.0 130.0 10:20 1059.700 0.49 148 100 95 0.91 1.4 249 1 130.0 135.0 10:25 1063.180 0.50 147 103 95 0.92 1.4 250 1 135.0 140.0 10:30 1066.580 0.50 147 107 95 0.92 1.4 250 2 140.0 145.0 10:35 1069.770 0.50 148 109 95 0.92 1.4 252 2 145.0 150.0 10:40 1073.070 0.51 148 110 96 0.94 1.4 251 2 150.0 155.0 10:45 1076.630 0.51 148 109 96 0.94 1.4 253 2 155.0 160.0 10:50 1080.250 0.50 148 109 96 0.92 1.4 253 3 160.0 165.0 10:55 1083.470 0.52 146 110 96 0.96 1.45 254 3 165.0 170.0 11:00 1086.790 0.52 146 110 96 0.96 1.45 252 3 170.0 175.0 11:05 1090.020 0.52 147 110 95 0.96 1.45 252 3 175.0 180.0 11:10 1092.940 0.52 148 109 96 0.96 1.45 254 4 180.0 185.0 11:15 1096.570 0.45 148 110 95 0.83 1.25 253 4 185.0 190.0 11:20 1099.820 0.44 147 110 95 0.81 1.2 250 4 190.0 195.0 11:25 1103.440 0.44 148 111 95 0.81 1.2 253 4 195.0 200.0 11:30 1106.900 0.45 150 110 95 0.83 1.25 251 5 200.0 205.0 11:35 1109.670 0.41 149 110 96 0.76 1.1 251 5 205.0 210.0 11:40 1113.090 0.41 149 109 97 0.76 1.1 253 5 210.0 215.0 11:45 1116.880 0.42 148 109 97 0.78 1.2 253 5 215.0 220.0 11:50 1119.840 0.42 148 110 97 0.78 1.2 261 6 220.0 225.0 11:55 1121.960 0.33 148 110 97 0.61 0.92 258 6 225.0 230.0 12:00 1123.720 0.33 147 109 97 0.61 0.92 259 6 230.0 235.0 12:05 1125.910 0.33 147 111 97 0.61 0.92 258 6 235.0 240.0 12:10 1127.580 0.33 147 110 97 0.92 257 

240.0 12:15 1129.776

Average: 150.76 0.46 147.9 104.5 91.4 0.85 1.26 252.9 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company FIBERTEK DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 2Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MOORE Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.94

Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 0.991 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 1.91134 CO2 (%) 1.5 Md 29.06 Stack Area (sf) 1.91

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 29.06 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

8:00:00 AM 0.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 0.00 0 67 678:05:00 AM 5.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 5.208 5.349 67 678:10:00 AM 10.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 10.474 10.391 68 688:15:00 AM 15.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 15.602 15.328 69 688:20:00 AM 20.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 20.786 20.187 69 698:25:00 AM 25.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 25.924 25.887 69 698:30:00 AM 30.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 31.023 29.639 70 708:35:00 AM 35.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 36.182 34.439 70 708:40:00 AM 40.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 41.042 39.401 71 708:45:00 AM 45.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 46.347 44.389 71 718:50:00 AM 50.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 51.176 49.328 72 728:55:00 AM 55.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 56.254 54.312 72 729:00:00 AM 60.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 61.417 59.195 72 729:05:00 AM 65.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 66.125 64.229 72 739:10:00 AM 70.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 71.265 69.658 73 739:15:00 AM 75.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 76.196 74.730 74 749:20:00 AM 80.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 82.193 81.152 75 749:25:00 AM 85.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 86.160 85.431 74 749:30:00 AM 90.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 91.089 90.615 74 749:35:00 AM 95.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 95.658 95.819 74 749:40:00 AM 100.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 100.431 100.875 74 749:45:00 AM 105.0 151 250 250 1 1 2 4 105.855 106.709 74 749:50:00 AM 110.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 4 109.876 111.386 75 749:55:00 AM 115.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 4 115.417 116.526 74 74

10:00:00 AM 120.0 149 120.399 121.581 74 74

Average 120.0 149.7 250.0 250.0 71.76 71.64

Volume 120.399 121.581 

dscm 0.12 0.12 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.0

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # HG PROBE Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company FIBERTEK DGM # HG2A/VOST 19 Method 30B Total Points 2Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator Bws (%) 3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp NA Ps (in Hg) 29.95

Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 0.991 Pm (in Hg) 30.01 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.4 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 1.91134 CO2 (%) 1.4 Md 29.04 Stack Area (sf) 1.91

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.71 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

10:20:00 AM 0.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 0.00 0 73 7310:25:00 AM 5.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 4.952 5.378 74 7410:30:00 AM 10.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 10.239 11.138 74 7410:35:00 AM 15.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 15.641 16.368 75 7510:40:00 AM 20.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 20.223 20.046 76 7610:45:00 AM 25.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 25.557 26.381 77 7610:50:00 AM 30.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 30.733 31.631 77 7610:55:00 AM 35.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 35.820 36.648 78 7611:00:00 AM 40.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 40.798 41.706 78 7711:05:00 AM 45.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 46.078 46.799 77 7811:10:00 AM 50.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 51.491 52.582 77 7811:15:00 AM 55.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 56.415 57.315 78 7811:20:00 AM 60.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 61.427 62.373 78 7811:25:00 AM 65.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 66.798 68.143 77 7811:30:00 AM 70.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 71.795 72.563 78 7811:35:00 AM 75.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 77.023 78.025 78 7811:40:00 AM 80.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 82.212 83.259 79 7911:45:00 AM 85.0 149 250 250 1 1 2 5 87.823 88.840 79 7911:50:00 AM 90.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 92.433 93.417 78 7911:55:00 AM 95.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 97.584 98.537 79 7912:00:00 PM 100.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 102.016 103.935 79 7912:05:00 PM 105.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 107.789 108.910 80 7912:10:00 PM 110.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 112.468 114.043 80 7912:10:00 PM 115.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 117.362 118.861 80 7912:15:00 PM 120.0 150 120.436 121.148 80 79

Average 120.0 149.8 250.0 250.0 77.56 77.36

Volume 120.436 121.148 

dscm 0.12 0.12 

Trap/ Probe Temp

15.0"@0.0

Pre Tes

15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.21 Probe # HG PROBE Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company FIBERTEK DGM # HG2A/VOST 19 Method 30B Total Points 2Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator Bws (%) 3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp NA Ps (in Hg) 29.95

Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 0.991 Pm (in Hg) 30.01 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 19.6 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 1.91134 CO2 (%) 1.3 Md 28.99 Stack Area (sf) 1.91

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.66 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

12:40:00 PM 0.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 0.00 0 78 7812:45:00 PM 5.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 4.938 5.647 78 7912:50:00 PM 10.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 10.009 10.927 80 8012:55:00 PM 15.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 15.583 16.621 80 80

1:00:00 PM 20.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 20.895 21.798 80 801:05:00 PM 25.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 26.058 26.902 79 801:10:00 PM 30.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 31.467 32.308 80 811:15:00 PM 35.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 36.631 37.258 80 811:20:00 PM 40.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 41.783 42.249 80 811:25:00 PM 45.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 47.197 47.601 80 811:30:00 PM 50.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 52.376 52.245 80 811:35:00 PM 55.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 58.078 58.178 80 811:40:00 PM 60.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 60.609 60.741 80 811:45:00 PM 65.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 68.364 68.276 82 821:50:00 PM 70.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 73.693 73.497 81 821:55:00 PM 75.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 78.996 78.531 81 822:00:00 PM 80.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 84.678 84.101 81 822:05:00 PM 85.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 89.517 88.947 81 822:10:00 PM 90.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 94.917 94.128 82 822:15:00 PM 95.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 100.502 99.537 82 822:20:00 PM 100.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 105.232 104.571 82 822:25:00 PM 105.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 110.448 109.627 82 822:30:00 PM 110.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 115.496 114.739 83 832:35:00 PM 115.0 150 250 250 1 1 2 5 119.927 119.182 83 832:40:00 PM 120.0 150 125.829 125.233 83 83

Average 120.0 150.0 250.0 250.0 80.72 81.24

Volume 125.829 125.233 

dscm 0.12 0.12 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.00 15.0"@0.0

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286C Probe # 51-3-2 Pollutant CR6+ Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 50-2 Method 0061 Total Points 12 12:50 16:55 15.0/0.000 7.5/0.000

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.578 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 20.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 0.94 Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MORRIS Bws (%) 5.20 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 153 Cp 0.806 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8.6 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 30.13 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.231 O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00029 CO2 (%) 1.45 Md 29.05 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.60 Ms 28.48 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,494 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 138.10 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.23 Total Vol.(cf) 138.7 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,914

Moisture % 5.22 Preliminary Ts (oF) 179 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.6 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,710

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3426 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 5.0 12:50 133.373 0.49 147 91 93 0.61 1 75 

1 5.0 10.0 12:55 136.42 0.49 147 93 90 0.61 1 82 1 10.0 15.0 13:00 139.83 0.50 147 93 90 0.62 1 83 1 15.0 20.0 13:05 143.39 0.49 148 98 90 0.61 1 87 2 20.0 25.0 13:10 147.19 0.51 148 100 90 0.63 1.05 85 2 25.0 30.0 13:15 149.86 0.51 147 101 90 0.63 1.05 85 2 30.0 35.0 13:20 153.44 0.51 147 102 89 0.63 1.05 86 2 35.0 40.0 13:25 156.8 0.51 147 102 90 0.63 1.05 86 3 40.0 45.0 13:30 159.79 0.52 145 104 91 0.64 1.1 85 3 45.0 50.0 13:35 163.11 0.52 146 105 91 0.64 1.1 85 3 50.0 55.0 13:40 166.34 0.50 147 105 90 0.62 1 86 3 55.0 60.0 13:45 169.72 0.50 147 105 90 0.62 1 88 4 60.0 65.0 13:50 173.08 0.45 148 106 91 0.56 0.93 86 4 65.0 70.0 13:55 176.51 0.46 148 107 92 0.57 0.95 84 4 70.0 75.0 14:00 179.63 0.46 148 108 93 0.57 0.95 81 4 75.0 80.0 14:05 183.19 0.46 147 107 93 0.57 0.95 82 5 80.0 85.0 14:10 186.58 0.41 146 106 93 0.51 0.85 82 5 85.0 90.0 14:15 189.84 0.42 147 106 94 0.52 0.87 83 5 90.0 95.0 14:20 193.11 0.42 147 106 94 0.52 0.87 83 5 95.0 100.0 14:25 196.23 0.42 147 105 94 0.52 0.87 83 6 100.0 105.0 14:30 198.72 0.34 146 105 93 0.42 0.71 85 6 105.0 110.0 14:35 202.3 0.33 147 107 94 0.41 0.68 85 6 110.0 115.0 14:40 204.71 0.33 147 108 94 0.41 0.68 86 6 115.0 120.0 14:45 206.86 0.32 147 108 94 0.40 0.66 86 1 120.0 125.0 14:55 209.324 0.58 145 101 95 0.72 1.2 83 1 125.0 130.0 15:00 212.96 0.58 146 102 94 0.72 1.2 83 1 130.0 135.0 15:05 216.542 0.58 146 105 93 0.72 1.2 90 1 135.0 140.0 15:10 219.032 0.58 149 107 93 0.72 1.2 91 2 140.0 145.0 15:15 221.67 0.54 149 105 94 0.67 1.1 91 2 145.0 150.0 15:20 225.132 0.55 148 106 93 0.68 1.15 91 2 150.0 155.0 15:25 228.372 0.54 147 107 94 0.67 1.1 90 2 155.0 160.0 15:30 231.662 0.55 147 107 94 0.68 1.15 91 3 160.0 165.0 15:35 234.422 0.46 147 106 94 0.57 0.95 91 3 165.0 170.0 15:40 237.642 0.48 147 109 94 0.59 1 92 3 170.0 175.0 15:45 240.802 0.48 148 110 93 0.59 1 92 3 175.0 180.0 15:50 243.292 0.48 145 111 94 0.59 1 87 4 180.0 185.0 15:55 246.612 0.42 147 111 96 0.52 0.87 88 4 185.0 190.0 16:00 250.092 0.41 147 110 97 0.51 0.85 87 4 190.0 195.0 16:05 252.512 0.41 147 109 96 0.51 0.85 88 4 195.0 200.0 16:10 256.142 0.41 147 110 96 0.51 0.85 89 5 200.0 205.0 16:15 259.43 0.38 146 111 96 0.47 0.79 89 5 205.0 210.0 16:20 262.332 0.38 146 112 96 0.47 0.79 91 5 210.0 215.0 16:25 265.642 0.38 147 111 95 0.47 0.79 90 5 215.0 220.0 16:30 268.712 0.38 147 111 97 0.47 0.79 91 6 220.0 225.0 16:35 270.95 0.35 146 111 96 0.43 0.73 90 6 225.0 230.0 16:40 272.622 0.35 145 110 95 0.43 0.73 90 6 230.0 235.0 16:45 274.802 0.35 146 110 94 0.43 0.73 88 6 235.0 240.0 16:50 277.442 0.34 147 110 94 0.42 0.71 88 

240.0 16:55 280.605

Average: 147.23 0.45 146.9 105.8 93.3 0.56 0.94 87 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286C Probe # 51-3-2 Pollutant CR6+ Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 50-2 Method 0061 Total Points 12 8:25 12:30 16.0/0.000 8.0/0.000

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.584 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 20.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 0.945 Date 14-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MORRIS Bws (%) 5.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 165.1 Cp 0.806 Ps (in Hg) 29.94Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 14 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 30.12 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.231 O2 (%) 20.59 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00029 CO2 (%) 1.56 Md 29.07 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.60 Ms 28.44 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,505 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 139.56 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.23 Total Vol.(cf) 140.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,920

Moisture % 5.70 Preliminary Ts (oF) 179 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.6 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,698

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3434 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 5.0 8:25 282.633 0.61 150 72 70 0.74 1.25 74 

1 5.0 10.0 8:30 285.38 0.59 149 72 71 0.72 1.2 75 1 10.0 15.0 8:35 289.1 0.60 149 78 71 0.73 1.25 79 1 15.0 20.0 8:40 292.25 0.60 149 81 71 0.73 1.25 83 2 20.0 25.0 8:45 295.83 0.55 147 86 73 0.67 1.15 85 2 25.0 30.0 8:50 299.07 0.55 147 86 74 0.67 1.15 86 2 30.0 35.0 8:55 302.49 0.55 147 90 75 0.67 1.15 86 2 35.0 40.0 9:00 305.33 0.55 147 92 75 0.67 1.15 86 3 40.0 45.0 9:05 308.4 0.48 148 93 77 0.58 1 85 3 45.0 50.0 9:10 311.71 0.48 147 93 77 0.58 1 85 3 50.0 55.0 9:15 314.29 0.47 147 95 79 0.57 0.97 84 3 55.0 60.0 9:20 317.01 0.48 147 98 79 0.58 1 85 4 60.0 65.0 9:25 320.31 0.41 146 100 80 0.50 0.85 83 4 65.0 70.0 9:30 322.92 0.42 147 100 81 0.51 0.87 83 4 70.0 75.0 9:35 326.24 0.42 147 102 82 0.51 0.87 82 4 75.0 80.0 9:40 329.59 0.42 146 101 84 0.51 0.87 84 5 80.0 85.0 9:45 331.87 0.39 147 102 85 0.47 0.81 83 5 85.0 90.0 9:50 334.37 0.39 147 102 85 0.47 0.81 83 5 90.0 95.0 9:55 337.9 0.40 146 101 86 0.49 0.83 84 5 95.0 100.0 10:00 341.31 0.40 147 101 86 0.49 0.83 84 6 100.0 105.0 10:05 344.77 0.31 147 100 87 0.38 0.64 84 6 105.0 110.0 10:10 347.22 0.31 147 101 87 0.38 0.64 84 6 110.0 115.0 10:15 350 0.32 145 87 102 0.39 0.66 84 6 115.0 120.0 10:20 353.15 0.32 145 103 87 0.39 0.66 84 1 120.0 125.0 10:30 356.212 0.52 147 100 88 0.63 1.1 82 1 125.0 130.0 10:35 358.75 0.51 148 98 87 0.62 1.05 83 1 130.0 135.0 10:40 362.031 0.50 148 99 87 0.61 1 82 1 135.0 140.0 10:45 365.051 0.50 147 99 87 0.61 1 83 2 140.0 145.0 10:50 367.79 0.49 147 101 86 0.60 1 82 2 145.0 150.0 10:55 371.121 0.49 148 103 87 0.60 1 84 2 150.0 155.0 11:00 374.121 0.48 149 102 87 0.58 0.99 85 2 155.0 160.0 11:05 377.541 0.48 147 102 88 0.58 0.99 87 3 160.0 165.0 11:10 380.161 0.53 147 103 88 0.64 1.1 87 3 165.0 170.0 11:15 382.751 0.53 145 102 89 0.64 1.1 87 3 170.0 175.0 11:20 386.141 0.51 146 103 89 0.62 1.05 86 3 175.0 180.0 11:25 389.381 0.52 147 104 89 0.63 1.1 88 4 180.0 185.0 11:30 392.661 0.45 147 105 89 0.55 0.93 88 4 185.0 190.0 11:35 395.251 0.45 149 104 88 0.55 0.93 87 4 190.0 195.0 11:40 398.841 0.45 150 105 89 0.55 0.93 86 4 195.0 200.0 11:45 401.671 0.45 148 105 90 0.55 0.93 86 5 200.0 205.0 11:50 404.45 0.42 147 105 90 0.51 0.87 85 5 205.0 210.0 11:55 407.231 0.42 147 105 89 0.51 0.87 86 5 210.0 215.0 12:00 410.651 0.42 147 105 90 0.51 0.87 85 5 215.0 220.0 12:05 413.671 0.42 147 105 89 0.51 0.87 86 6 220.0 225.0 12:10 416.63 0.34 146 106 91 0.41 0.71 87 6 225.0 230.0 12:15 419.731 0.34 147 106 91 0.41 0.71 87 6 230.0 235.0 12:20 423.121 0.34 147 105 91 0.41 0.71 87 6 235.0 240.0 12:25 426.471 0.34 147 105 91 0.41 0.71 87 

240.0 12:30 429.281

Average: 146.65 0.46 147.2 98.2 84.5 0.56 0.95 84.3 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286C Probe # 51-3-2 Pollutant CR6+ Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 50-2 Method 0061 Total Points 12 12:55 17:00 16.0/0.000 8.0/0.000

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.581 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 20.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 0.938 Date 14-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator MORRIS Bws (%) 3.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run 240.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 69.9 Cp 0.806 Ps (in Hg) 29.93Barometric 29.99 Silica Gel Weight Gain 40.2 DGM Y 0.993 Pm (in Hg) 30.11 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.231 O2 (%) 20.54 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00029 CO2 (%) 1.35 Md 29.04 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.60 Ms 28.64 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,488 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 138.70 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.23 Total Vol.(cf) 139.4 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,905

Moisture % 3.60 Preliminary Ts (oF) 179 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,765

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.3402 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 5.0 12:55 430.875 0.52 144 92 91 0.66 1.1 81 

1 5.0 10.0 13:00 433.65 0.50 144 95 90 0.63 1 81 1 10.0 15.0 13:05 436.54 0.50 146 98 90 0.63 1 80 1 15.0 20.0 13:10 439.33 0.50 146 100 90 0.63 1 80 2 20.0 25.0 13:15 442.51 0.52 147 101 91 0.66 1.1 82 2 25.0 30.0 13:20 445.71 0.52 147 105 91 0.66 1.1 83 2 30.0 35.0 13:25 448.62 0.51 148 105 92 0.65 1.05 83 2 35.0 40.0 13:30 451.92 0.51 148 106 91 0.65 1.05 85 3 40.0 45.0 13:35 455.1 0.49 150 106 92 0.62 1 85 3 45.0 50.0 13:40 458.36 0.48 147 104 92 0.61 0.99 86 3 50.0 55.0 13:45 461.43 0.49 147 104 92 0.62 1 86 3 55.0 60.0 13:50 464.28 0.50 147 106 93 0.63 1 87 4 60.0 65.0 13:55 467.61 0.45 148 106 93 0.57 0.93 87 4 65.0 70.0 14:00 470.29 0.45 147 105 93 0.57 0.93 87 4 70.0 75.0 14:05 473.75 0.45 147 105 93 0.57 0.93 87 4 75.0 80.0 14:10 476.71 0.45 147 104 92 0.57 0.93 83 5 80.0 85.0 14:15 480.11 0.41 149 104 93 0.52 0.85 84 5 85.0 90.0 14:20 483.31 0.41 148 104 94 0.52 0.85 85 5 90.0 95.0 14:25 486.54 0.41 147 103 93 0.52 0.85 85 5 95.0 100.0 14:30 489.74 0.42 147 103 93 0.53 0.87 86 6 100.0 105.0 14:35 492.48 0.32 147 102 93 0.41 0.66 86 6 105.0 110.0 14:40 495.69 0.32 147 102 93 0.41 0.66 86 6 110.0 115.0 14:45 498.65 0.32 147 102 92 0.41 0.66 86 6 115.0 120.0 14:50 501.24 0.32 147 102 92 0.41 0.66 86 1 120.0 125.0 15:00 504.772 0.60 149 98 90 0.76 1.25 81 1 125.0 130.0 15:05 508.32 0.59 148 100 92 0.75 1.2 82 1 130.0 135.0 15:10 511.837 0.59 148 101 91 0.75 1.2 82 1 135.0 140.0 15:15 514.757 0.59 148 102 91 0.75 1.2 82 2 140.0 145.0 15:20 517.72 0.54 147 104 92 0.68 1.1 85 2 145.0 150.0 15:25 520.457 0.54 147 104 92 0.68 1.1 88 2 150.0 155.0 15:30 523.287 0.54 147 103 90 0.68 1.1 86 2 155.0 160.0 15:35 526.867 0.54 147 102 90 0.68 1.1 84 3 160.0 165.0 15:40 530.017 0.45 146 102 91 0.57 0.93 85 3 165.0 170.0 15:45 533.237 0.45 146 103 91 0.57 0.93 85 3 170.0 175.0 15:50 535.927 0.45 147 103 91 0.57 0.93 85 3 175.0 180.0 15:55 539.607 0.45 145 103 92 0.57 0.93 86 4 180.0 185.0 16:00 543.187 0.41 147 104 92 0.52 0.85 86 4 185.0 190.0 16:05 545.737 0.42 147 103 92 0.53 0.87 85 4 190.0 195.0 16:10 549.037 0.41 146 103 92 0.52 0.85 86 4 195.0 200.0 16:15 551.817 0.41 146 104 91 0.52 0.85 84 5 200.0 205.0 16:20 555.34 0.39 147 104 92 0.49 0.81 86 5 205.0 210.0 16:25 558.657 0.39 148 105 92 0.49 0.81 87 5 210.0 215.0 16:30 562.177 0.39 147 105 92 0.49 0.81 86 5 215.0 220.0 16:35 564.567 0.39 147 101 93 0.49 0.81 86 6 220.0 225.0 16:40 568.22 0.40 147 103 92 0.51 0.83 87 6 225.0 230.0 16:45 571.437 0.40 147 103 93 0.51 0.83 86 6 230.0 235.0 16:50 573.657 0.38 147 103 93 0.48 0.79 86 6 235.0 240.0 16:55 575.967 0.38 147 103 93 0.48 0.79 86 

240.0 17:00 578.245

Average: 147.37 0.46 147.0 102.7 91.9 0.58 0.94 84.8 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286-C Probe # 30-3-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 53-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 9:19 10:45 17.0/0.005 7.0/

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.703 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 1.482 Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator STARKEY Bws (%) 3.34 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 21.7 Cp 0.808 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.3 DGM Y 1.002 Pm (in Hg) 30.08 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.256 O2 (%) 20.61 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00036 CO2 (%) 1.47 Md 29.06 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 0.98 Ms 28.69 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,480 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 41.94 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 42.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,894

Moisture % 3.36 Preliminary Ts (oF) 147 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.3 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,764

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.2822 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 9:19 636.179 0.32 148 77 79 0.94 1.05 2

2 5.0 10.0 9:24 639.44 0.42 149 79 78 1.24 1.4 23 10.0 15.0 9:29 643.12 0.45 149 80 78 1.32 1.45 24 15.0 20.0 9:34 646.31 0.52 148 79 78 1.53 1.7 25 20.0 25.0 9:39 650.16 0.48 147 83 79 1.41 1.6 26 25.0 30.0 9:44 654.30 0.52 148 82 78 1.53 1.7 21 30.0 35.0 10:15 657.712 0.30 149 83 81 0.88 0.98 22 35.0 40.0 10:20 661.20 0.43 148 79 79 1.27 1.4 23 40.0 45.0 10:25 665.71 0.43 148 79 80 1.27 1.4 24 45.0 50.0 10:30 668.63 0.54 148 84 80 1.59 1.75 25 50.0 55.0 10:35 672.02 0.49 148 86 79 1.44 1.6 26 55.0 60.0 10:40 675.92 0.53 146 85 81 1.56 1.75 2

60.0 10:45 678.958

Average: 42.78 0.45 148.0 81.3 79.2 1.33 1.48 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286-C Probe # 30-3-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 53-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 17:21 18:25 18.0/0.003 10.0

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.679 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 1.49 Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator STARKEY Bws (%) 2.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 16.3 Cp 0.808 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8.4 DGM Y 1.002 Pm (in Hg) 30.08 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.256 O2 (%) 20.44 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00036 CO2 (%) 1.49 Md 29.06 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 0.98 Ms 28.75 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,479 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 40.51 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 40.7 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,895

Moisture % 2.79 Preliminary Ts (oF) 147 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,787

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.2815 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 17:21 766.260 0.52 148 89 90 1.58 1.7 2

2 5.0 10.0 17:26 769.27 0.46 149 91 90 1.40 1.5 23 10.0 15.0 17:31 773.52 0.50 149 86 90 1.52 1.65 24 15.0 20.0 17:36 777.54 0.50 148 85 89 1.52 1.65 25 20.0 25.0 17:41 781.01 0.42 148 94 89 1.28 1.4 26 25.0 30.0 17:46 784.40 0.32 147 92 89 0.97 1.05 21 30.0 35.0 17:55 787.726 0.58 148 93 90 1.76 1.9 22 35.0 40.0 18:00 791.90 0.47 148 91 89 1.43 1.55 23 40.0 45.0 18:05 795.66 0.44 147 93 90 1.34 1.44 24 45.0 50.0 18:10 798.67 0.44 148 91 89 1.34 1.44 25 50.0 55.0 18:15 803.60 0.42 147 92 90 1.28 1.4 26 55.0 60.0 18:20 805.72 0.36 147 93 91 1.10 1.2 2

60.0 18:25 808.345

Average: 42.09 0.45 147.8 90.8 89.7 1.38 1.49 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286-C Probe # 30-3-1 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company FIBERTEK DGM # 53-1 Method M26A Total Points 12 19:00 20:05 15.5/0.000 10.0

Location LAKELAND, FL Rate (cfm) 0.703 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source BAGHOUSE Delta ∆H@ 1.486 Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator STARKEY Bws (%) 2.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 18 Cp 0.808 Ps (in Hg) 29.95Barometric 30.01 Silica Gel Weight Gain 7.4 DGM Y 1.002 Pm (in Hg) 30.08 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.8 Actual Dn (in) 0.256 O2 (%) 20.47 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 1.56 An (ft^2) 0.00036 CO2 (%) 1.43 Md 29.05 Stack Area (sf) 1.92

Est.DH(in H2O) 0.98 Ms 28.74 Act. Flow (cfm) 4,489 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 41.96 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 42.2 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 3,901

Moisture % 2.77 Preliminary Ts (oF) 147 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.3 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 3,793

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) 0.2815 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 19:00 810.812 0.57 148 89 90 1.72 1.85 2

2 5.0 10.0 19:05 815.57 0.50 148 88 87 1.51 1.65 23 10.0 15.0 19:10 818.61 0.50 149 89 88 1.51 1.65 24 15.0 20.0 19:15 821.19 0.44 149 88 87 1.33 1.45 25 20.0 25.0 19:20 825.21 0.42 148 88 87 1.27 1.4 26 25.0 30.0 19:25 827.69 0.30 148 88 86 0.91 0.98 21 30.0 35.0 19:35 831.144 0.52 148 86 87 1.57 1.7 22 35.0 40.0 19:40 835.21 0.49 149 87 86 1.48 1.6 23 40.0 45.0 19:45 838.75 0.45 149 88 87 1.36 1.45 24 45.0 50.0 19:50 842.10 0.43 148 89 87 1.30 1.4 25 50.0 55.0 19:55 846.00 0.40 148 90 88 1.21 1.3 26 55.0 60.0 20:00 850.79 0.43 148 91 89 1.30 1.4 2

60.0 20:05 854.220

Average: 43.41 0.45 148.3 88.4 87.4 1.37 1.49 2

Leak Check











































APPENDIX D 

Equipment Calibration 

Documents 

















































APPENDIX E 

Laboratory Analytical 

Reports 














Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

(mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter 

(mg)

Organic 

(mg)

Inorganic 

(mg)

Filterable 

PM2.5 Catch 

Weight (mg)

Organic 

PM2.5 Cat

Weight (m

Run 1 35 7.4 27.4 6.2 8.0 34.80 6 Run 2 60 4.5 30.6 31 6.5 35.10 31 Run 4 64 8.3 30.0 4.2 5.9 38.30 4 

Blank: 47 ND ND ND 1.9

RDL: 0.5 0.30 1.0 0.50

Corrected

OTM 27/28 PM2.5 Lab Results Blank Correction

Fibertek Insulation

Lakeland Florida

BTEC job # 10-3990.21

Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010

OTM27 OTM28
Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight (mg)

Run 1 157 59.4 157.00 59.4 216.4

Run 2 128 70.3 128.00 70.3 198.3

Run 3 172 95.2 172.00 95.2 267.2

Blank 200 ND ND

RDL 1 0.5 0.30

Method 5 PM Lab Results

Corrected

Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.21

Lakeland Florida

Fibertek Insulation
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Filter 

RDL 

(μg)

R1 

Result

(μg)

R2 

Result

(μg)

R3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detect 

Limit 

(RDL)

(μg)

R1

(μg)

R2 

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.80 0.80 

Arsenic 1.09 0.40 2.4 1.9 2.2 0.80 1.27 0.82 

Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 

Cadmium 0.11 0.10 25.50 3.82 1.84 0.20 25.39 3.71 

Chromium 1.92 0.30 14.10 8.4 6.4 0.60 12.18 6.45 

Cobalt ND 0.10 1.46 1.13 0.63 0.20 1.46 1.13 

Lead 1.10 0.20 14.0 7.46 5.61 0.40 12.9 6.36 

Manganese 1.12 0.75 8.7 6.0 6 1.5 7.6 4.9 

Nickel 0.56 0.50 9.4 8.9 4.9 1.0 8.84 8.34 

Selenium ND 1.0 9.7 9.4 11.3 2.0 9.7 9.4 

Corrected

Method 29 Lab Results

Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.21

Lakeland Florida

Fibertek Insulation
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Hex 

Chrome 

RDL

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Run 1 640 300 4.6 0.3 3.80

Run 2 600 300 1.6 0.3 0.80

Run 3 480 300 1.2 0.2 0.40

Blank H2O 390 ND 0.20

Blank KOH 300 0.80 0.20

Method 0061 Lab Results

Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.21

Lakeland Florida

Fibertek Insulation
Volume (mL)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrofluoric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hyd

Ac

Run 1 260 ND ND 200 Run 2 280 ND ND 200 Run 3 280 ND ND 200 

Blank H20 200 ND ND

Blank H2SO4 210 ND ND

RDL 1 200 200

Corrected

Method 26A Lab Results

Fibertek Insulation

Lakeland Florida

BTEC job # 10-3990.21

Sampling Dates: October 11-15, 2010
Your Project #: 10-3990.21 

Site: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/01

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8257

Received: 2010/10/19, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/29 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 4 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/26 

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/10/26 

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/10/26 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 0 8 9 5 H O 0 8 9 6 H O 0 8 9 7 H O 0 8 9 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/13

11:25 17:15 20:50 19:25

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TRAIN RUN 1-OTM28 RUN 2-OTM28 RUN 4-OTM28 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28

Weight g 150 140 150 240 0.1 2308673

DCM Weight g 150 220 210 250 0.1 2308672

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.9 8.0 6.5 5.9 0.50 2311813

Organic Condensible PM mg ND 6.2 31 4.2 1.0 2308671

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 0 9 0 1 H O 0 9 0 2 H O 0 9 0 3 H O 0 9 0 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/13

10:56 14:20 20:25 15:35

COC Number

 U n i t s TRAIN RUN 1-OTM27 RUN 2-OTM27 RUN 4-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 7.4 4.5 8.3 0.5 2305844

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 27.4 30.6 30.0 0.30 2312155

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 47 35 60 64 1 2305786

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO0895 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0896 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0897 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0898 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 4-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2308671 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2311813 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2308672 N/A 2010/10/26 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2308673 N/A 2010/10/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HO0901 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO0902 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0903 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0904 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 4-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2312155 N/A 2010/10/29 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2305844 2010/10/22 2010/10/29 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2305786 N/A 2010/10/26 NUA

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8257 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HO0895-01: INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HO0896-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HO0897-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish white residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HO0898-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Blackish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp 

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8257

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2305844 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/10/29 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2308671 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 93 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 92 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 0.5 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/26 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2311813 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6
Your Project #: 10-3990.21 

Site: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/29

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8228

Received: 2010/10/19, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/28 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/25 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 1 H O 0 7 1 2 H O 0 7 1 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

09:10 15:15 19:50

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 59.4 70.3 0.5 2307782

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.30 157 128 0.30 2311217

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 200 83 84 1 2307784

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/12

14:55

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 95.2 0.5 2307782

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 172 0.30 2311217

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 84 1 2307784

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 1 H O 0 7 1 2 H O 0 7 1 2 H O 0 7 1 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

09:05 15:10 15:10 19:47

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2311063

Total Arsenic (As) ug 1.09 0.40 2.36 2.36 1.91 0.80 2311063

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2311063

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.11 0.10 25.5 25.6 3.82 0.20 2311063

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.92 0.30 14.1 14.2 8.37 0.60 2311063

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 1.46 1.48 1.13 0.20 2311063

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.10 0.20 14.0 13.9 7.46 0.40 2311063

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.12 0.75 8.7 8.9 6.0 1.5 2311063

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.56 0.50 9.4 9.4 8.9 1.0 2311063

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 9.7 9.9 9.4 2.0 2311063

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 0 7 1 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/12

14:30

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.80 2311063

Total Arsenic (As) ug 2.18 0.80 2311063

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.20 2311063

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 1.84 0.20 2311063

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 6.38 0.60 2311063

Total Cobalt (Co) ug 0.63 0.20 2311063

Total Lead (Pb) ug 5.61 0.40 2311063

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 6.0 1.5 2311063

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 4.9 1.0 2311063

Total Selenium (Se) ug 11.3 2.0 2311063

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO0711 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0712 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0712 D u p Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2311063 2010/10/28 2010/10/28 N_R

Maxxam ID HO0713 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HO0719 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2311063 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2307782 2010/10/25 2010/10/27 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2311217 N/A 2010/10/28 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2307784 N/A 2010/10/25 NUA

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8228 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/10/29 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HO0711-01RNormal

HO0712-01RNormal

HO0713-01RLFT

HO0719-01RLFT/LPC

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LPC Loose particulate material in the petri dish

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except HO0711, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HO0712.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8228

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307782 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/10/27 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2311063 N_R Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 94 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 86 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 87 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 1.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 3.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HO0712) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 92 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HO0712) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 94 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 2.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 95 % 85 - 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8228

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2311063 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 87 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 90 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 2.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 93 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 3.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 93 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 94 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 93 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 0.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 93 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 1.9 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 0.98, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 0.97, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8228

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2311063 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/28 0.4 % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/28 0.6 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/28 0.8 % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/28 0.5 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/28 1.5 % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/28 0.5 % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/28 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental102710 Report

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80331 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 22 0 10/15/2010 Run 1

80316 10/20/2010 Veronica Bucks 43 0.2 20 10/15/2010 Run 1

80255 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 22 0.7 10/15/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80317 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 40 0 20 10/15/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80341 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 24 0 10/15/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80278 10/25/2010 Veronica Bucks 41 0.9 20 10/15/2010 Run 2, Trap A

Variability +- 10%

Plant/Source Lakeland, FL 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

10/27/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew 

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available

(248)-548-8072 
Your Project #: 10-3990.21 

Site: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/01

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E7660

Received: 2010/10/19, 17:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/27 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/23 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 4 0 H N 8 0 5 1 H N 8 0 5 2 H N 8 0 5 2

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/13

20:02 20:00 13:30 13:30

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 200 210 260 1 2311238

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2311245

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2311245

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 5 3 H N 8 0 5 4 H N 8 0 5 5

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14

19:00 20:30 13:40

COC Number N/A N/A

 U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 280 280 2311238 390 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.2 2307260

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 2311245 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2311245 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 5 6 H N 8 0 5 8 H N 8 0 5 8 H N 8 0 5 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/14 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14

13:45 19:15 19:15 14:15

COC Number

 U n i t s BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN 1-M0061 RUN 1-M0061 RUN 2-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 300 1 640 600 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.8 0.2 4.6 4.6 1.6 0.3 2307260

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H N 8 0 6 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/14

18:00

COC Number

 U n i t s RUN 3-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 480 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 1.2 0.2 2307260

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HN8040 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8051 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8052 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8052 D u p Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8053 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Maxxam ID HN8054 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2311245 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2311238 N/A 2010/10/27 A_S

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HN8055 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8056 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8058 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8058 D u p Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Maxxam ID HN8059 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HN8061 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/19

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307260 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E7660 Client Project #: 10-3990.21

Report Date: 2010/11/01 Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.21

P.O. #:

Project name: FIBERTEK INSULATION

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E7660

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307260 LLE Matrix Spike

(HN8058) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 109 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 103 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 0.9 % 20

2311245 A_S Matrix Spike

(HN8052) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 99 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 101 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 100 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 102 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/27 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/27 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 7