Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      CREW v. FEC (D.D.C. 1:14-cv-1419) (District court 2016)

FEC Record: Litigation*CREW v. FEC* (D.D.C. 1:14-cv-1419) (District court)September 21, 2016 On September 19, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the "Court") ruled that the Commission''s dismissal of two administrative complaints filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and its founder Melanie
    Sloan ("CREW") was contrary to law. **Background**
     In 2012, CREW filed administrative complaints with the FEC against Americans for Job Security (MUR 6538) and American Action Network (MUR 6589). The complaints alleged that the groups should have registered as political committees because they received
    more than $1,000 in "contributions" or made more than $1,000 in "expenditures," as those terms are defined in the Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act), and their major purpose was allegedly the nomination or election of federal candidates. The
    Commission, by a vote of three to three, did not find reason to believe that either AJS or AAN had violated the Act, and closed both cases. (The Act requires an affirmative vote of four or more Commission members to find reason to believe that FECA
    has been violated. 52 USC § 30109(a)(2).) On August 20, 2014, CREW filed an action for judicial review of the Commission''s dismissal of CREW''s administrative complaints. CREW challenged the controlling Commissioners'' approach of applying the "major purpose test" by focusing on express advocacy
    spending and excluding AJS''s and AAN''s spending on electioneering communications. CREW also challenged the controlling Commissioners'' approach of considering AAN and AJS''s relevant spending over the course of each organization''s lifetime instead
    of during a calendar year. And finally, CREW alleged that the controlling Commissioners had improperly applied a 50% plus spending threshold for relevant expenditures. CREW separately claimed that the dismissal decisions amounted to "de facto rules"
    that violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but in August 2015, the Court dismissed CREW''s APA claims because FECA''s judicial review provision, 52 USC § 30109(a)(8), provides an "adequate, alternative means to challenge" the dismissal
    decisions. The parties, including intervenor-defendant AAN, subsequently filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the remaining FECA-related claims. **Decision**
     The Court determined that *Citizen''s United v. FEC* and subsequent lower court decisions recognized a distinction between less-restrictive disclosure requirements and a more restrictive ban on speech. The court concluded that the controlling
    Commissioners'' decision to apply an express advocacy/issue speech distinction in the context of FECA''s political committee requirements—excluding the groups'' electioneering communications from relevant electoral spending in conducting their major
    purpose analysis—was contrary to law. The Court also concluded that a major purpose evaluation that considers the entire lifetime of the organization is neither unreasonable nor contrary to law "as a general matter." But the court found that in the AAN and AJS matters, the Commissioners had
    "refus[ed] to give any weight whatsoever to an organizations'' relative spending in the most recent calendar year" and that such an approach, "at least as applied to" a fifteen-year-old organization like AJS, was contrary to law "in that it tends
    to ignore crucial facts indicating whether an organization''s major purpose has changed." With respect to CREW''s arguments regarding the Commission''s alleged application of a 50% plus spending threshold for defining major purpose, the Court rejected the premise of that argument, explaining that "most importantly, it is far from apparent
    that the Commissioners did apply any such 50%-plus spending threshold for defining major purpose," and further concluded that "[a] reasonable application of a 50%-plus rule would not appear to be arbitrary and capricious." Ultimately, the Court found that the Commission''s dismissal of CREW''s administrative complaints against AJS and AAN was contrary to law, and directed the Commission to conform with its declaration within 30 days. **Resources** *CREW v. FEC*(14-1419) litigation page
 Author
          Christopher BergCommunications Specialist


Read next: FEC will not appeal district court decision in CREW v. FEC (DDC 14-1419)
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms