alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

12 p.m., Monday, March 19, 2007.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                     

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 9, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 07-1201 Filed 3-9-07; 2:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### MARGARET THORBURN, PETITIONER, v. L. BAMBERBER & COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

This matter coming on before the court and it appearing to the court that the petitioner filed a formal petition and an answer was filed by the respondent denying that the accident alleged in petition arose out of or during the course of her employment, and the petitioner testified that she was employed by L. Bamberger & Company as a waitress, and that on May 28th, 1928, one of the other waitress’ arm hit her in the breast and she did nothing about it for a week or ten days and later felt a pain there and reported to the hospital at Bambergers and the doctor there treated the condition and it got worse and she then went to Dr. Charles M. Robbins, and he operated on petitioner for cancer and removed the entire left breast.

Dr. Charles M. Robbins was sworn in and testified that he did operate on the petitioner and that in his opinion she was suffering from a cancer which was of a longer standing than the May, 1928, alleged accident, and that in his opinion the cancer was not the result of a trauma but that it was possible that a trauma might aggravate a dormant cancerous condition. The doctor is of the opinion that this cancer was quite extensive and could not possibly have resulted from the injury received in May, 1928.

*752The matter was settled between the parties wherein the petitioner was to receive and the respondent agreed to pay the sum of $650 net in one payment and assume the bill of Dr. Robbins in the amount of $350 and the hospital bill in the sum of $115.50, and the attorney for the petitioner, Mr. Kessell, is to be paid the sum of $125 by respondent.

The respondent, without admitting or denying the accident and without admitting or denying liability, agrees to pay the foregoing figures in full and final settlement of the disputed question as to whether or not this condition was a result of the accident alleged by petitioner, and the petitioner in consideration therefore agrees to accept said sum of money in full and final settlement of all claims which she now has against L. Bamberger & Company on account of her present condition and agrees that at no time will she make a claim for further compensation on account of this accident.

I, having heard the testimony in open court and having explained to the petitioner the terms of the settlement and she having agreed thereto without any reservations of any kind, it is therefore * * * ordered that the respondent pay to the petitioner the sum of $650 in one payment and that the respondent further pay Dr. Robbins’ bill of $350, hospital bill of $115.50, and the attorney for the petitioner, Mr. Kessell, the sum of $125 in full and final settlement of all claims arising out of this alleged accident, and I approve of the settlement above set forth.

Harry J. Goas, *Deputy Oommissioner.*
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 00-20154

Summary Calendar

_______________________

DIANA MENARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF HOUSTON, ET. AL., 

Defendant,

CITY OF HOUSTON, 

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

Lower Docket No. H-99-CV-2931

_________________________________________________________________

July 19, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has considered appellant’s position in light of

the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so,
we find no reversible error of fact or law and affirm for

essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.
§ 96.71 Definitions. ( a ) Section 2005 (a)(2) and (a)(5) (42 U.S.C. 1397d (a)(2) and (a)(5)) of the Social Security Act establishes prohibitions against the provision of room and board and medical care unless, among other reasons, they are an “integral but subordinate” part of a State-authorized social service. “Integral but subordinate” means that the room and board provided for a short term or medical care is a minor but essential adjunct to the service of which it is a part and is necessary to achieve the objective of that service. Room and board provided for a short term shall not be considered an integral but subordinate part of a social service when it is provided to an individual in a foster family home or other facility the primary purpose of which is to provide food, shelter, and care or supervision, except for temporary emergency shelter provided as a protective service.
( b ) As used in section 2005(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397d (a)(5)) with respect to the limitations governing the provision of services by employees of certain institutions, *employees* includes staff, contractors, or other individuals whose activities are under the professional direction or direct supervision of the institution.
[47 FR 29486, July 6, 1982; 47 FR 43062, Sept. 30, 1982]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14527-14528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Monday, April 16, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis 
Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203, 
703-741-0300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology and Logistics, to the Director of Defense Research and 
Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense 
Advanced Research Projects

[[Page 14528]]

Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing an 
effective and economical research and development program in the area 
of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on 
benefits to national defense. These reviews may form the basis for 
research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments 
and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities or in 
government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include 
programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics, 
and electronic materials.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that this Advisory Group 
meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec.  552b(c)(1), and that 
accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 20, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-1492 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 122.726 Annual inspections. ( a ) Each rescue boat must be stripped, cleaned, thoroughly inspected, and any necessary repairs made, at least once each year, including emptying and cleaning of each fuel tank, and refilling it with fresh fuel.
( b ) Each davit, winch, fall and other launching appliance must be thoroughly inspected, and any necessary repairs made, once each year.
( c ) Each item of lifesaving equipment with an expiration date must be replacing during the annual inspection and repair if the expiration date has passed.
( d ) Each battery used in an item of lifesaving equipment, except inflatable survival craft equipment, must be replaced during the annual inspection if the expiration date of the battery has passed. The expiration date of the battery may be marked on the battery in clearly legible letters or the owner or managing operator may have a record of the expiration date from the manufacturer of a battery marked with a serial number.
( e ) Except for a storage battery used in a rescue boat, each battery without an expiration date indicated on it or for which the owner or managing operator does not have a record of the expiration date, used in an item of lifesaving equipment, must be replaced during the annual inspection.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.310 Ventilation system type.

A cargo handling space must have a permanent forced ventilation system of the exhaust type.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of FBC Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher LeClerc, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  November 21, 2011
/s/ Christopher LeClercBy:  Christopher LeClercIts:  Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FBC Holding, Inc. and will be retained by FBC Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 15.601 General.

The following sections of subparts F, G, and H of this part contain provisions concerning manning of uninspected vessels; §§ 15.701, 15.705, 15.710, 15.720, 15.730, 15.801, 15.805, 15.810, 15.820, 15.825, 15.840, 15.850, 15.855, 15.905, 15.910, and 15.915.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2121 

To provide for the transfer of certain Federal property to the Galveston 

Historical Foundation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2009 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the transfer of certain Federal property to 

the Galveston Historical Foundation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO THE 

4 GALVESTON HISTORICAL FOUNDATION. 

5 (a) TRANSFER.—Not later than 90 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

7 General Services shall offer to convey to the Galveston 

8 Historical Foundation, by quitclaim deed, all right, title, 

9 and interest of the United States in and to the real prop10 erty located at 502 20th Street, Galveston, Texas 77550 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2121 IH

1 (including all buildings and improvements on that real 

2 property). 

3 (b) CONSIDERATION.—The conveyance under this 

4 section shall be in accordance with a fair market value 

5 appraisal that is acceptable to the Administrator. 

6 (c) COST OF CONVEYANCE.—The Galveston Histor7 ical Foundation shall be responsible for all real estate 

8 transaction costs associated with the conveyance. 

9 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Ad10 ministrator may require that any conveyance under sub11 section (a) be subject to such additional terms and condi12 tions as the Administrator considers to be appropriate to 

13 protect the interests of the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 4.1


 


ARTICLES OF DISSOLUTION


 


Pursuant to section 607.1403, Florida Statutes, this Florida profit
corporation submits the following articles of dissolution:


 


		FIRST:	The name of the corporation as currently filed with the Florida Department of State: CBA Florida, Inc.



 


		SECOND:	The document number of the corporation (if known): P99000089885



 


		THIRD:	The date dissolution was authorized: May 28, 2020

Effective date of dissolution if applicable: June 26, 2020



 


		FOURTH:	Dissolution was approved by the shareholders, in the manner required by this chapter and the articles of incorporation.



 


	 	CBA FLORIDA, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	
        /s/ Anthony Snow

	 	 	Name:	Anthony Snow
	 	 	Title:	President


 






     


     


    

Notice of Corporate Dissolution


 


This notice is submitted by the dissolved corporation named below
for resolution of payment of unknown claims against this corporation as provided in s. 607.1407. F.S.


 


This “Notice of Corporate Dissolution”
is optional and is not required when filing a voluntary dissolution.


 


Name of Corporation: CBA Florida, Inc.


 


The above named corporation is the subject of dissolution and the
effective date of dissolution is: June 26, 2020


 


Description of information that must be included in a claim:


 


		1.	Name, address, phone number and e-mail of claimant, including contact person.



		2.	Dollar amount of claim.



		3.	All documentation supporting claim, including, but not limited to, itemized invoices and/or billing statements, copies of contracts
or agreements, etc.



 


Mailing address where written claims can be sent: (Claims cannot
be sent to the Division of Corporations)


 


Anthony Snow


CBA Florida, Inc.


95 S. Federal Hwy., Suite 201


Boca Raton, FL 33432


 


A claim against the above named corporation will be barred unless
a proceeding to enforce the claim is commenced within 4 years after the filing of this notice.


 


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
        Anthony Snow
	 	 	
        /s/ Anthony
        Snow

	 	Printed Name of the Person Filing	 	 	Signature of the Person Filing
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Jan 24 2011 

Mr. Charles L. Rummage 

6289 Banshire Drive 

Mechanicsville, VA 23111 

Dear Mr. Rummage: 

In your November 1, 2007 letter, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to amend § 135.299 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

When the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 

14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking 

found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when 

making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition 

for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and 

3) the resources we have available to address these issues. 

After careful consideration, we do not believe permitting the requirements of § 135.299 

to be accomplished in a flight simulator are in the public interest. The purpose of 

§ 135.299 line checks is much broader than that proposed in your petition. 

The intent of the rule is to expose crewmembers to the actual flying environment and 

events they may encounter during line operations. For example, the opportunity to 

evaluate the correlation between forecast, both reported and encountered, and actual 

meteorological conditions, crew resource management and decisionmaking, air traffic 

control phraseology, airport signage and lighting, and ground operations. By observing 

factors in a real environment, pilots also hear and derive situational awareness from other 

pilot reports and responses, including those delivered by short, slang, and incorrect 

phraseology that nonetheless have a bearing on situational awareness. 
2

Additionally, the visual capability of many simulators is limited. These limitations both 

in visual acuity and by number of available airport models will not permit the simulator 

to substitute for the airport qualification requirements of the rule. The route qualification 

requirements of the rule would also be jeopardized due to terrain limitations of many 

simulators as they relate to minimum reception altitudes and associated route hazards. 

The requirements of § 135.299 may be conducted during revenue service and, in that 

context, do not generate additional flight or manpower requirements. Therefore, the 

economic savings realized by the suggested petition is minimal. If the cost of the 

additional simulator time, visual airport modeling requirements, and programming 

changes required to accurately simulate terrain and obstacles are factored in, the actual 

cost of the proposed rule change may increase the cost of compliance with the current 

rule. 

For the reasons above, we are unable to consider and thereby deny your petition for 

rulemaking in accordance with § 11.73. 

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2007-0292 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
ARB and U.S. EPA Region IX Meeting

California Draft 111(d) Plan; Emission Units

April 30, 2015

11AM-12PM

1. Differences in the affected units list:

a. Primary differences

b. Definitions 

c. Overall Significance

2. Technical corrections to affected EGU list and State performance goals after rule 

is final.

3. New versus modified/reconstructed (EGU versus facility) and “once in always in.”

4. Next Steps
SUSAN M. COLUNS

MAINe

April 3, 2014

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer

Chief, Essen~ialAir Service Program

U.S. Departmennof Transportation

120,0 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

t.·).

Dear Mr.Schlemmer,

Peninsula Airways, Inc. (PenAir) has submitted a proposal in response to a Request for

Proposal (RFP) for Essential Air Services (EAS) flights between Presque Isle, Maine, and

Boston, Massachusetts.

Penair is a regional airline that flies nearly 45 flights per week in the eastern United

States. The company, founded in 1955, has provided air service to Presque Isle and Bar Harbor

since winning an EAS contract to serve those communities in early 2012,

While PeDAir was the only carrier that submitted an application, Iam supportive of

continued service to these communities is vital, and I request that you give its proposal

consideration. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact John Kane in my office at

(202) 224-9296.

Sincerely,

Susan M. Collins

United States Senator

m f'RlNTEDON RECVCLEDPAPER