alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 108.209 Hospital spaces. ( a ) Each unit carrying twelve or more persons on a voyage of more than three days must have a hospital space.
( b ) Each hospital space must be suitably separated from other spaces.
( c ) No hospital space may be used for any other purpose, when used for care of the sick.
( d ) An entrance to each hospital space must be wide enough and arranged to readily admit a person on a stretcher.
( e ) Each berth in a hospital space must be made of metal.
( f ) Each upper berth must be hinged and arranged so that it can be secured clear of the lower berth.
( g ) Each hospital space must have at least one berth that is accessible from both sides.
( h ) Each hospital space must have one berth for every 12 persons or portion thereof on board, who are not berthed in single occupancy rooms, but the number of berths need not exceed six.
( i ) Each hospital space must have a toilet, washbasin, and bathtub or shower accessible from the hospital space.
( j ) Each hospital space must have clothes lockers, a table, and seats.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.5



                         WIRELESS XCESSORIES GROUP, INC.

                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


     Pursuant to the Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan"), the Board of Directors has granted an option to purchase shares of
Common Stock of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. as follows:

         Name and Address
         of Optionee:



         Position of
         Optionee:


         Date of Grant:



         Type of Option:



         Number of shares
         subject to Option:


         Exercise Price:



         Vesting Dates:


         Expiration Date:

                                       1

<PAGE>

     The option is subject to all the terms and conditions of the Plan, a copy
of which has been delivered to Optionee.

     By signing this Agreement, Optionee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the
Plan and agrees to be bound by its terms.




OPTIONEE:


_____________________________
Name:



WIRELESS XCESSORIES GROUP, INC.


By: _____________________________
    Name:

    Title:


Date:


                                       2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc.and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Stephen Rade, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



By: /s/ Stephen Rade
   --------------------------------------
   Stephen Rade
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
   February 28, 2005
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27. 2012 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEM TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Audit Hearing: Washington State Republican Party 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to 

the hearing date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Signed: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission 

Submitted: June 20, 2012 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220
#### Smith v. Prentiss, appellant.

*Usury—subsequent gift by borrower. '*

Where a loan was made at seven per cent, *held,*that a subsequent gift of a certain sum per year by the borrower to the children of the lender did not affect the legality of the transaction.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury. The action was brought in Kings county to foreclose a mortgage by Increase 0. Smith against Samuel J. Smith, Jr., and others, among whom were G-uy E. Prentiss and wife, who alone defended and appealed.

*O. G. & S. F.*Prentiss, for appellants.

*Merritt F. Sawyer,*for respondent.

Barmard, P. J.

The opinion contains nothing of general interest. The head-note states the only point of any importance passed upon.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 99.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Anthony E. Papa, as Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of NetLojix Communications, Inc. (the "Company"),certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the yearended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

/s/  ANTHONY E. PAPA --------------------------------- Anthony E. Papa Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 

March 26, 2003
1 Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation November 24, 2015

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. Exemption No. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) request amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 11467,

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0261 fo r the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. In addition to

the DJI S1000, DJI S900, DJI S800, and Ready Copter , AIR wishes to add the EZ

- Rig, a proprietary

design, to its exemption grant , with the authority to operate with a tethered line attached to the UA. AIR

wishes to use the Naza

- M V2 flight controller with this system

.

For your ease in reviewing this request for amendment, please refer to the exhibit list which

begins on page 2

. Information relating to the proprietary design of the EZ Rig is being submitted

confidentially. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §11.35, AIR request confidential treatment f or information

regarding the EZ

- Rig , submitted as Exhibit 1

. Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. requests that the

information contained in that exhibit not be made public because there are trade secrets that would harm

the owner of the information. It contains valuable commercial data that is not publicly available and is

protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552( b)(4).

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503

- 312

- 9804 or via email at

Drew.p@aerialins pectionresources.com

.

Thank you,

Drew Pairamore

Director of Regulatory Compliance

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.2 

### Table of Contents

EZ Rig Exhibits

Exhibit 1 : EZ Rig Specifications ..............................Submitted confidentially to the FAA

Exhibit 2 : Futaba 14 SG User Manual

..................... Uploaded separately due to size constraints

Exhibit 3 : DJI 2.4g Bluetooth Datalink............... Uploaded separately due to size constraints

Flight Controller Exhibits

Exhibit 4 : DJI Naza M V2 User Manual

.............. Uploaded separately due to size constraints

Exhibit 1 has been submitted confidentially to the FAA and is not available to the public.3 

### Exhibit 1: EZ Rig Specifications

The EZ Rig is a proprietary design. Documentation regarding this UA has been

submitted as Exhibit 2 and is not available to the public.
#### § 108.663 Unit markings: Load line.

Each unit that is assigned a load line must have the load line marked in accordance with Part 42 of this chapter.
#### § 112.15-10 Loads on systems without a temporary emergency power source.

If there is no temporary emergency power source, the loads under § 112.15-1 must be arranged so that they can be energized from the final emergency power source.
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reports dated February 16, 1999, included in or incorporated
by reference into ThermoQuest Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended January 2, 1999, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements as follows: Registration Statement No. 333-08795 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-08797 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
333-08799 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-24321 on Form S-3, and
Registration Statement No. 333-67853 on Form S-8.


                                                            Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 304.95 [Reserved]
----

Note the sparse nature of the high-backscatter dredged material deposit compared to the Mamala Bay sites.  The scale across the bottom of the image is about 6.5 km.  Vertical exaggeration is 3x.

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
§ 11.456 Requirements for limited master of Great Lakes and inland self-propelled vessels of less than 100 GRT. ( a ) An endorsement as limited master for vessels of less than 100 GRT upon Great Lakes and inland waters may be issued to an applicant to be employed by organizations such as formal camps, educational institutions, yacht clubs, and marinas with reduced service requirements. An endorsement issued under this paragraph is limited to the specific activity and the locality of the camp, yacht club, or marina. To obtain this restricted endorsement, an applicant must— ( 1 ) Have 4 months of service in the operation of the type of vessel for which the endorsement is requested;
( 2 ) Satisfactorily complete a safe boating course approved by the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators, a public education course conducted by the U.S. Power Squadron or the American Red Cross, or a Coast Guard-approved course. This course must have been completed within 5 years before the date of application; and
( 3 ) Pass a limited examination appropriate for the activity to be conducted and the route authorized.
( b ) The first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) course certificates required by § 11.201(i) of this part will only be required when, in the opinion of the Coast Guard, the geographic area over which service is authorized precludes obtaining medical services within a reasonable time.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


NAME OF ENTITY                                    STATE OF INCORPORATION
--------------                                    ----------------------

First USA Direct Marketing, Inc.                  Delaware
First USA Financial Services, Inc.                Utah Industrial Loan Company
First USA Technology, Inc.                        Delaware
Gensar Holdings, Inc.                             Delaware
Gensar Merchant Processing, Inc.                  Delaware
MAGroup, Inc.                                     Arizona
Merchant Link, Inc.                               Delaware
National Card Processing Systems, Inc.            Delaware
Paymentech Data Services, Inc.                    Delaware
Paymentech Fleet Services, Inc.                   Delaware
Paymentech ICS, Inc.                              Delaware
Paymentech New Hampshire, Inc.                    Delaware
Paymentech Management Resources, Inc.             Delaware
Paymentech Merchant Services, Inc.                Nevada
Paymentech Network Services, Inc.                 Delaware
PHH/Paymentech L.L.C.                             Delaware
#### Frank P. Adams, *Respondent, v.*A. Clark Squier, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment vacated and demurrer stricken, out, without costs to either party. Opinion

*Per Curia/m.*
EXHIBIT 10.4


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No 333-117529) and Form S-8 (No 333-110696,
333-100971 and 333-11650) of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. of our report
dated April 2, 2004, with respect to the financial statements of
Surf-Communications Solutions BV. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004.


Amsterdam, June 27, 2005

/S/ MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN

MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN

F.D.N. Walta, RA
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1968 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1968

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on capital losses to $10,500 and to index such limitation to inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on capital losses to $10,500 and to index such limitation to inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES OF INDIVIDUALS INCREASED TO 
              $10,500.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on capital losses) is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(1)(A) in the case of married individual filing a 
        separate return, 50 percent of the amount in effect under 
        subparagraph (B) for the taxable year, or
            ``(B) $10,500 in any other case, or''.
    (b) Cost-of-Living Increase.--Section 1211 of such Code is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Cost-of-Living Increase.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
        beginning in a calendar year after calendar year 2009, the 
        $10,500 amount under subsection (b)(1)(B) shall be increased by 
        an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2008' for `calendar year 1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.
            ``(2) Rounding.--If any amount after adjustment under 
        paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $100, such amount shall be 
        rounded to the next higher multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1968

KANUBHAI R. GANDHI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LES BROWNLEE, Acting Secretary, Department of

the Army of the United States,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,

District Judge. (CA-03-141-4)

Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: January 18, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kanubhai R. Gandhi, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kanubhai R. Gandhi appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

summary judgment to Defendant in this employment discrimination

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Gandhi v. Brownlee, No. CA-03-141-4 (E.D Va. July 6, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SUPREME COURT.

#### Rebecca H. Browne, executrix, &c., agt. Fergus Cochran *et al.*

*Special*Term,

February, 1873.

Where there is no complete remedy at law, an action in equity is the proper remedy to recover possession of a deed—a paper title of certain property in Ireland.

Van Brunt, J.

This action is brought to recover possession of ascertain paper alleged to be a deed of certain property in Ireland. The objection is made by defendants that it is a case of replevin, and a suit in a court of equity was not necessary. The answer to that objection is, that a judgment in replevin provides for the verdict of the jury to place a valuation on the property claimed, which it would not be possible to do in this case, as, in consequence of the peculiar nature of the instrument sought to be recovered, there is no basis upon which its value could be assessed, and we cannot determine whether it is worth anything or not.

Beside, in replevin the property taken can be counter-bonded by the defendant, and such action upon the part of the defendant in such a case as this would entirely defeat the object of the suit.

It seems to me, therefore, that there is no complete remedy at law, and an action in equity must be brought.

A new trial must be had in this action, because error was committed in excluding the evidence of J. H. Lipsett as to what took place between himself and his mother at the time the deed was received by Lipsett.

*428Mrs. Browne, the plaintiff, having been examined as to what took place at that interview, the last clause of section 399 withdraws the prohibition contained in the first part of the section.

Because of this.error a new trial must be had.
# CE2009259EN.01012102.xml

| 29.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 259/121 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 259/121

---

Application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia) (codified version) *

P6_TA(2008)0165

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 April 2008 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia) (codified version) (COM(2007)0753 — C6-0475/2007 — 2007/0265(CNS))

(2009/C 259 E/24)

(Consultation procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2007)0753), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2007)0753),

| — | having regard to Article 83 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0475/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 83 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0475/2007),

| — | having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

| — | having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0089/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0089/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

2.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CSI Business Finance, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:  November 21, 2005                   By: /s/  Timothy J. Connolly
                                               ------------------------
                                           Name:    Timothy J. Connolly
                                           Title:   Chief Executive Officer


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906,  has been  provided to CSI Business
Finance,  Inc. and will be retained by CSI Business Finance,  Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1
#### § 63.18 Limitations on costs.

The amount of the award shall be set forth in the grant award document. The total cost to the Government will not exceed the amount set forth in the grant award document or any modification thereof approved by the Assistant Secretary which meets the requirements of applicable statutes and regulations. The Government shall not be obligated to reimburse the grantee for costs incurred in excess of such amount unless and until the Assistant Secretary has notified the grantee in writing that such amount has been increased and has specified such increased amount in a revised grant award document. Such revised amount shall thereupon constitute the maximum cost to the Government for the performance of the grant.