Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      Independence Institute v. FEC remanded to three-judge district court

FEC Record: Litigation*Independence Institute v. FEC* remanded to three-judge district courtMarch 7, 2016 On March 1, 2016, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a majority and a dissenting opinion.  The majority opinion rejected the district court's dismissal of the Independence Institute's challenge to the Federal Election Campaign Act's (the Act) electioneering communications provisions. The appeals court remanded the case to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia with instructions to convene a three-judge district court to consider the plaintiff's constitutional challenge under a special judicial review provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). **Background**            On September 2, 2014, the Independence Institute, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization in Colorado, filed suit asking for a preliminary injunction and a three-judge court to hear its challenge to the Federal Election Campaign Act's (the Act) definition of “electioneering communication” and related disclosure requirements. The group contends those requirements are overbroad as applied to its proposed radio ad that would mention a federal candidate and air within 60 days of the general election. The Act defines an “electioneering communication” as any broadcast, cable or satellite communication that refers to a clearly identified federal candidate, is made within 30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general, special or runoff election, and is targeted to the relevant electorate. 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(3)(A)(i). The statute provides that persons making disbursements that aggregate more than $10,000 per year must file a report with the Commission disclosing the names and addresses of all contributors who contributed more than $1,000. 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(1), (2)(A). Commission regulations provide that when a corporation finances an electioneering communication, only the sources of donations to the corporation made “for the purpose of further electioneering communications” must be disclosed. 11 C.F.R.  104.20(c)(9). On October 6, 2014, the district court found the plaintiff’s challenge to be foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent, principally by *Citizens United v. FEC*, and dismissed the case in its entirety. **Analysis**            To qualify for consideration by a three-judge district court under the BCRA a suit must raise a substantial federal question. The appeals court noted that the Supreme Court's recent *Shapiro v. McManus* decision stressed that the exception for insubstantial claims is narrow and the exception "applies only when the case is 'essentially fictitious, wholly insubstantial, obviously frivolous, and obviously without merit.'” Independence Institute claims that its as-applied challenge to the electioneering communications rules differs from the one rejected by the Supreme Court in *Citizens United*.  Among other things, Independence Institute emphasized that it is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, while *Citizens United* was a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization. The majority specified that *Citizens United* did not address "whether a speaker’s tax status or the nature of the nonprofit organization affects the constitutional analysis of BCRA’s disclosure requirement." The majority concluded that because "Independence Institute has advanced at least one argument – the 501(c)(3) argument – that is not 'essentially fictitious, wholly insubstantial, obviously frivolous, and obviously without merit,'” the case must proceed to a three-judge court. The appeals court reversed the judgment of the district court denying the request for a three-judge district court, vacated the judgment of the district court in favor of the FEC, and remanded the case to the district court with directions for it to initiate the procedures to convene a three-judge district court. In a dissenting opinion, one member of the panel concluded that Independence Institute’s claims are “squarely foreclosed” by Supreme Court precedent, and that he accordingly would have dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia: Case 1:14-cv-01500 **Resources:** *Independence Institute v. FEC*litigation page
 Author
          Alex  Knott


Read next: Independence Institute v. FEC (Supreme Court)
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms