alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.135 Stowage and segregation for materials of Class 4.3. ( a ) Class 4.3 materials listed in Table 148.10 of this part which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases, must— ( 1 ) Be kept as cool and dry as practical before loading;
( 2 ) Not be loaded or transferred between vessels during periods of rain or snow;
( 3 ) Be stowed separate from foodstuffs and all Class 8 liquids; and
( 4 ) Be stowed in a mechanically ventilated hold. Exhaust gases must not penetrate into accommodation, work or control spaces. Unmanned barges that have adequate natural ventilation need not have mechanical ventilation.
( b ) The bulkhead between a hold containing a Class 4.3 material and incompatible materials must have cable and conduit penetrations sealed against the passage of gas and vapor.
#### § 84.21 Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 84.22, no qualified individual with a disability shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with disabilities, be excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of the programs or activities of a recipient, or be subjected to discrimination by any recipient.

[89 FR 40185, May 9, 2024]
# C_2008075EN.01001801.xml

| 26.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/18

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 424th meeting on 16 February 2007 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/E-1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators

(2008/C 75/09)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines as regards the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines as regards the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission, as regards the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector, on the increase of the basic amount for ThyssenKrupp AG and it subsidiaries in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands due to an aggravating circumstance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission, as regards the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector, on the increase of the basic amount for ThyssenKrupp AG and it subsidiaries in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands due to an aggravating circumstance.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission, as regards the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases, or rewarding cooperation outside its scope. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission, as regards the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases, or rewarding cooperation outside its scope.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the infringements in the elevators and escalators sector in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### § 131.805 General alarm bell, switch.

The switch in the pilothouse that activates the general alarm bell must be clearly and permanently identified either by letters on a metal plate or with a sign in red letters on a suitable background that state the following: “GENERAL ALARM.”
§ 618.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 618.225 and 618.230, and §§ 618.300 through 618.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 618.300 through .310.* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 618.300 through 618.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 618.300 through 618.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 618.300 through 618.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 618.300 through 618.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 618.300 through 618.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
Process Control System Overview – Multi-Point Ground Flare Stages

The multi-point ground flare systems for the PDH-1 project and the LHC-9 project consist of several 

stages. The first stage is steam-assisted and is always in service. The remaining stages (Stages 2 and 

higher) are pressure-assisted and are in/out of service via staging logic.

The burner design requires the inlet pressure to be within a certain range to operate with smokeless 

flaring. The staging system opens and closes staging valves in order to keep the header pressure between 

these desired ranges. 

The staging system consists of a manifold header with automated valves (staging valves) used to direct 

flare gas flow from the flare header to the burners. Input from pressure transmitters on the inlet header 

opens and closes staging valves according to gas pressures. Each stage is operated automatically with an 

actuated fail-closed staging valve that is only open or closed (no modulation). Buckling pin bypass 

valves are included in the staging scheme to provide the intended protection in the case of a staging valve 

malfunction. 

The control system monitors the main header pressure. As the pressure rises (indicating more flow), the 

next stage is opened. Should the pressure continue to rise, the next stage opens. If the pressure falls, the 

staging valves close in reverse sequence.

Stage 1 remains online continuously and is steam-assisted. Stage 1 does not use a staging valve; however 

there is a control valve to limit the volumetric flow of the waste gas. As the flow increases in the header 

as it starts to pressurize, the control system monitors the exit velocity from the stage 1 burners. When it 

approaches the allowable limits, the control valve will start to close to limit the flow. As this happens, the 

pressure in the header will continue to increase until stage 2 opens. The stage 1 control valve continues to 

stay partially closed to limit the volumetric flow. Once the flow decreases, and all the upper stages (2+) 

are closed, the control valve will open wide open again. This stage operates down to the minimum purge 

rate required for the flares. 

Cross-light testing of the individual burners at an off-site test facility was done in April to confirm that 

the burners will properly ignite when a new stage goes into service. The burners performed as expected 

at the expected staging pressure.
---

---

# Exhibit 10.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No
333-130048) and Form S-8 (No 333-110696, 333-100971 and 333-11650) of B.O.S. Better Online
Solutions Ltd. of our report dated March 25, 2005, with respect to the financial
statements of Odem Electronic Technologies 1992 Ltd. included in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

|                  |                                                         
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------
|                  | /S/ Kesselman & Kesselman                               
|                 
|Jerusalem, Israel | Kesselman & Kesselman                                   
|June 27, 2006     | Certified Public Accountants (Israel)                   
|                  | A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited



---

---
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00244-CR

IN RE Ernest HASTINGS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 30, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the 

trial court to rule on his pro se motion to dismiss appointed counsel. However, in order to be 

entitled to mandamus relief, relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to 

perform a non-discretionary act; (2) was asked to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to do 

so. In re Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). When 

a properly filed motion is pending before a trial court, the act of giving consideration to and 

ruling upon that motion is ministerial, and mandamus may issue to compel the trial judge to act. 

See Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, orig. 

proceeding). However, mandamus will not issue unless the record indicates that a properly filed 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-7940, styled State of Texas v. Ernest Hastings, in the 437th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding. 
04-11-00244-CR

- 2 -

motion has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. Relator has the 

burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petition [ ] a certified or sworn copy of 

every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any 

underlying proceeding”); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 

833, 837 (Tex. 1992). 

Here, relator has not provided this court with a file stamped copy of his motion or any 

other documents to show that a properly filed motion is pending before the trial court and has 

been brought to the trial court’s attention. Additionally, relator asserts he filed his motion to 

dismiss appointed counsel on March 28, 2011, just two days before relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus was filed in this court. Relator has failed to meet his burden that a properly filed 

motion has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. Based on the 

foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# C_2008163EN.01003601.xml

| 26.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/36

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 163/07)

| Aid No | XR 77/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region | Noord-Nederland (ex parte Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe) |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Uitvoeringsbesluit Investeringspremieregeling Noord-Nederland 2008 (verkort: uitvoeringsbesluit IPR 2008) |
| Legal basis | Verordening van (12 december en 19 december) van Provinciale Staten van Friesland, Groningen en Drenthe op grond van artikel 145 van de Provinciewet houdende regels betreffende de subsidiering van activiteiten op het terrein van investeringen aan stuwende ondernemingen |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | EUR 12,8 million |
| Overall budget | EUR 12,8 million; Paid over: 1 year |
| Maximum aid intensity | 15 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2008 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Samenwerkingsverband Noord-Nederland |
| Laan Corpus den Hoorn 200 |
| 9728 JS Groningen |
| Nederland |

Aid No

XR 77/08

Member State

Netherlands

Region

Noord-Nederland (ex parte Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe)

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

Uitvoeringsbesluit Investeringspremieregeling Noord-Nederland 2008 (verkort: uitvoeringsbesluit IPR 2008)

Legal basis

Verordening van (12 december en 19 december) van Provinciale Staten van Friesland, Groningen en Drenthe op grond van artikel 145 van de Provinciewet houdende regels betreffende de subsidiering van activiteiten op het terrein van investeringen aan stuwende ondernemingen

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

EUR 12,8 million

Overall budget

EUR 12,8 million; Paid over: 1 year

Maximum aid intensity

15 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2008

Duration

31.12.2008

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Samenwerkingsverband Noord-Nederland

Laan Corpus den Hoorn 200

9728 JS Groningen

Nederland

| Postbus 779 |
| --- |
| 9700 AT Groningen |
| Nederland |

Postbus 779

9700 AT Groningen

Nederland

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

www.snn.eu

http://www.snn.eu/infotype/webpage/view.asp?objectID=565

Other information

—

---
#### § 126.520 Certificate of Inspection: Conditions of validity.

To maintain a valid Certificate of Inspection, you must complete your annual and periodic inspections within the periods specified in § 126.510 (a) and (b) and your Certificate of Inspection must be endorsed.
claim pursuant to this subsection is not effective unless notice is given as

required by this subsection."); NRS 616C.235(1)(b) (providing that the insurer may close a claim only if the claimant does not timely contest the closure). Further, as the claim remains open, the appeals officer properly reversed the hearing officer's decisions in the concurrent administrative appeals denying transfer of care and medical expense reimbursement, and the appeals officer properly concluded that the reopening issue was moot.

Because the hearing officer improperly dismissed the administrative appeal as untimely and the appeals officer reversed without determining whether closure was warranted, the merits were not heard. In their reply brief, appellants ask that this court remand for a merits determination. Under NRS 616C.235(1)(a), however, appellants' failure to properly serve their notice of claim closure renders the closure ineffective. Accordingly, a merits determination with respect to that notice is not warranted, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

n ) -- ;
J. Saitta

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA Gibbons Pickering

cc: Hon James Todd Russell, District Judge James Georgeson, Settlement Judge

• Gninasso Law, Ltd. Kinney & Levinson Carson City Clerk

2

(01 1947A ■ Ia
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 07-1774  Filed 4-5-07; 4:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
§ 15.805 Master. ( a ) There must be an individual holding an appropriate license as or a valid MMC with endorsement as master in command of each of the following vessels: ( 1 ) Every self-propelled, seagoing documented vessel of 200 GRT and over.
( 2 ) Every self-propelled inspected vessel;
( 3 ) Every inspected passenger vessel;
( 4 ) Every inspected small passenger vessel; and
( 5 ) Every towing vessel of at least 8 meters (26 feet) or more in length must be in command of a master of towing vessels, or a mariner holding a license or MMC endorsed as master of inspected, self-propelled vessels greater than 200 GRT holding either— ( i ) A completed Towing Officer's Assessment Record (TOAR), bearing the signature of a Designated Examiner and stating that the Examiner found the candidate proficient; or
( ii ) A license or MMC endorsed for master of towing vessels.
( 6 ) Every uninspected passenger vessel of at least 100 GRT.
( 7 ) Every uninspected passenger vessel engaged on an international voyage.
( b ) On vessels subject to STCW, the individual meeting the requirement of this section must also hold an STCW endorsement as master with the appropriate tonnage for the vessel which he or she is operating, except as noted in § 15.105(g) of this part for vessels on domestic near-coastal voyages.
( c ) Every vessel documented under the laws of the United States, other than a vessel with only a recreational endorsement, must be under the command of a U.S. citizen.
[CGD 81-059, 52 FR 38623, Oct. 16, 1987, as amended by CGD 81-059, 54 FR 149, Jan. 4, 1989; USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53223, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-1999-6224, 64 FR 63235, Nov. 19, 1999; 66 FR 20944, Apr. 26, 2001; USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34767, May 15, 2002; USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11261, Mar. 16, 2009; USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78005, Dec. 24, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.25-2 Cargo handling space. Pump rooms, compressor rooms, refrigeration rooms, heating rooms, instrument rooms or other closed spaces regularly entered by operating personnel, in which work is performed on the cargo or in which the cargo movement is locally controlled, may be required to be fitted with one of the following types of ventilation: ( a ) *Forced ventilation.* The forced ventilation system shall be designed to insure sufficient air movement through these spaces to avoid the accumulation of toxic or flammable vapors and to insure sufficient oxygen to support life, and, in any event, the ventilation system shall have a minimum capacity sufficient to permit a change of air every 3 minutes.
( b ) *Natural ventilation.* The natural ventilation system shall be designed to insure sufficient air movement to avoid the accumulation of toxic or flammable vapors and to insure sufficient oxygen to support life.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 19, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00388

- CV

IN RE HECKMANN WATER RESOURCES (CVR), INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on May 30, 2014. On August 11, 2014, relator filed an agreed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus on the basis that the issues raised in the mandamus proceeding have been rendered moot by the parties’ settlement agreement in the underlying matter.

Relator’s agreed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus is GRANTED. This original mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT. This court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 19 th , 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on

this 19 th day of August, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12

- 06

- 11697

- DCVCLM, styled Jose Luis Aguilar, Individually; Eudelia Aguilar, Individually; Vanessa Arce, Individually; Eudelia Aguilar and Vanessa Arce as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Carlos Aguilar; Clarissa Aguilar as Next Friend of Carlos Aguilar Jr.; Alyssa Nicole Aguilar; Andrew Aguilar; Marcus Aguilar; K aylee Aguilar; Elsa Quinones as Next Friend of Karime Aguilar and Carla Aguilar v. Heckmann Water Resources (CVR), Inc. and Ruben Osorio Gonzalez , pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz presiding.
MvpJawcturing Process Desuiption PMN Sabstaric+e No.1 [X]—C81—entirepageIManufacturing Rrocess Description RNiN Substence No. 2 [ X ] — CSI — errtiree page