alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James G. Jennings, III,
Chief Financial Officer of 21st Century Holding Company hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         21st Century Holding Company.


By:  /s/ James G. Jennings, III
-----------------------------------------------
James G. Jennings, III, Chief Financial Officer
§ 95.705 Equipment costs—Federal financial participation. ( a ) *General rule.* In computing claims for Federal financial participation, equipment having a unit acquisition cost of $25,000 or less may be claimed in the period acquired or depreciated, at the option of the State agency. Equipment having a unit acquisition cost of more than $25,000 shall be depreciated. For purposes of this section, the term depreciate also includes use allowances computed in accordance with the cost principles prescribed in part 75.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Equipment purchased under service agreements with other State agencies and under cost-type contracts shall be depreciated. However, equipment having a unit acquisition cost of $25,000 or less may be claimed in the period acquired if (a) the State agency approved the specific purchase and the claiming of the cost of the item, and (b) the contract or service agreement requires that the equipment or its residual value be transferred to the State agency when the equipment is no longer needed to carry out the work under the contract or service agreement.
( 2 ) Reimbursement for ADP equipment having an acquisition cost in excess of $25,000 and subject to subpart F of this part must be depreciated over its useful life unless otherwise specifically provided for by the Department. ADP equipment not subject to subpart F is subject to the requirements of this subpart.
[47 FR 41576, Sept. 21, 1982, as amended at 75 FR 66341, Oct. 28, 2010; 81 FR 3020, Jan. 20, 2016]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7703

MICHAEL HAAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JACK LEE, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional

Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-572-3)

Submitted: March 26, 2004 Decided: April 13, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Robert Gerson, ROBINSON & GERSON, P.C., Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellant. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Haas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his petition as untimely filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Haas has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# CE2010015EN.01009301.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 15/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 15/93

---

Tuesday 21 October 2008Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation: EC and New Zealand *

P6_TA(2008)0478

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2008 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Community of the Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation between the European Community of the one part and the Government of New Zealand of the other part (COM(2008)0170 — C6-0292/2008 — 2008/0066(CNS))

2010/C 15 E/21

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2008)0170),

having regard to Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (1),

1

having regard to Article 170 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0292/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 and Rules 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0367/2008),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of New Zealand. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of New Zealand.

---

(1)  OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

---
**IN THE SUPREME COUR T OF**  **THE ST AT**  **E OF MONT**  **ANA DA**  **2 1**  **- 0**  **258** ST AT E OF MONT

ANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DA VID LA WRENCE PITTSLEY

, JR. , Defendant and Appellant . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief and Declaration in Support , and good cause appearing; **IT IS HEREBY**

**ORDERED** that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 28, 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s Opening Brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2022

05/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0258
§ 400.53 General eligibility requirements. ( a ) Eligibility for refugee cash assistance is limited to those who— ( 1 ) Are new arrivals who have resided in the U.S. less than the RCA eligibility period determined by the ORR Director in accordance with § 400.211;
( 2 ) Are ineligible for TANF, SSI, OAA, AB, APTD, and AABD programs;
( 3 ) Meet immigration status and identification requirements in subpart D of this part or are the dependent children of, and part of the same family unit as, individuals who meet the requirements in subpart D, subject to the limitation in § 400.208 with respect to nonrefugee children; and
( 4 ) Are not full-time students in institutions of higher education, as defined by the Director.
( b ) A refugee may be eligible for refugee cash assistance under this subpart during a period to be determined by the Director in accordance with § 400.211.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Celerity Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-63795) of our report dated
February 26, 1999, which report includes an explanatory paragraph regarding
substantial doubt about Celerity Systems, Inc.'s ability to continue as a going
concern, on our audits of the financial statements of Celerity Systems, Inc. as
of December 31, 1997 and 1998 and for each of the two years then ended December
31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


                                        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Knoxville, Tennessee
April 14, 1999
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1515]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, Scholarly Works G13 Review.
    Date: June 4, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Health Science Administrator, 
Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, MSC 
7968, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-594-4937, [email protected].
    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, R21 Review
    Date: July 11, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Health Science Administrator, 
Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, MSC 
7968, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-594-4937, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1515 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
# C_2008179EN.01001301.xml

| 16.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/13

---

Commission Notice concerning the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties

(2008/C 179/07)

On 29 May 2002, Notice 2002/C 127/06 (1) setting out guidelines regarding the application of Article 11(8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (2) on the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

1

2

Official Journal of the European Union

On 23 April 2005, further to the enlargement of the European Community on 1 May 2004, Notice 2005/C 99/04 (3) was published in the languages of the new Member States, except in Maltese.

3

Further to the enlargement of the European Community on 1 January 2007, given that translations of the Notice into the languages of the acceding Member States, as well in Maltese, are now available and in the interests of equal and fair treatment for all concerned parties, the text of that Notice is now reproduced in each of the new languages in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 29.5.2002, p. 10.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

2

(3)  OJ C 99, 23.4.2005.

3

---
#### John Burnside, *Respondent, v.*Hugh McCrossan, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Gilbert, ‘J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1955 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold 

as part of an educational program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. DUNCAN, and Mr. MCHUGH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold as part of an educational 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agriculture Education 

5 Freedom Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1955 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR AMOUNTS 

2 RECEIVED ON SALE OF ANIMALS WHICH ARE 

3 RAISED AND SOLD AS PART OF EDU4 CATIONAL PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

7 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

8 by inserting after section 139C the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 139D. PROCEEDS OF SALE OF ANIMALS RAISED AND 

10 SOLD AS PART OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM. 

11 ‘‘In the case of an individual, gross income shall not 

12 include any gain from the sale of any animal which is 

13 raised and sold by such individual as part of such individ14 ual’s participation in— 

15 ‘‘(1) the 4–H program under the Cooperative 

16 State Research, Education, and Extension Service of 

17 the Department of Agriculture, 

18 ‘‘(2) the Future Farmers of America, 

19 ‘‘(3) any program of an organization described 

20 in section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 

21 501(a) which is similar to such 4–H program or the 

22 Future Farmers of America, or 

23 ‘‘(4) any program of an educational organiza24 tion described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1955 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for such part III is amended by inserting after the item 

3 relating to section 139C the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139D. Proceeds of sale of animals raised and sold as part of educational 

program’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to sales in taxable years ending 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
§ 96.62 Presiding officer. ( a ) A Department employee to whom the Secretary delegates such authority, or any other agency employee designated by an employee to whom such authority is delegated, may serve as the presiding officer and conduct a hearing under this subpart.
( b ) The presiding officer is to be free from bias or prejudice and may not have participated in the investigation or action that is the subject of the hearing or be subordinate to a person, other than the Secretary, who has participated in such investigation or action.
( c ) The Secretary is not precluded by this section from prior participation in the investigation or action that is the subject of the hearing.
( d ) A different presiding officer may be substituted for the one originally designated under § 96.61 of this part without notice to the parties.
#### § 119.700 General.

Materials used in piping systems must meet the requirements of this subpart and be otherwise acceptable to the cognizant OCMI.
§ 108.405 Fire detection system. ( a ) Each fire detection system and each smoke detection system on a unit must— ( 1 ) Be approved by the Commandant in accordance with 46 CFR 161.002; and
( 2 ) Have a visual alarm and an audible alarm in the pilothouse or at a normally manned control station for the system.
( b ) Each fire detection system must be divided into zones to limit the area covered by any particular alarm signal.
( c ) Each visual alarm must— ( 1 ) Have a chart or diagram next to the alarm that shows the location of the zones in the system and that contains the instructions for operating, and testing the system;
( 2 ) When activated show the zone in the system where fire has been detected; and
( 3 ) Be in a noticeable location in the pilothouse or control station.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56808, Dec. 4, 1978, USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48266, July 22, 2016]
#### § 126.450 Fire-extinguishing equipment.

At each inspection for certification, the marine inspector determines whether the tests and inspections required by § 132.350 of this subchapter have been performed.
FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2009DEC -9 AM 8: 33

OCALA DIVISION

MARIBETH SCHONBERG, )
STEVEN E. SCHONBERG, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)

v. ) Case No. 5:09-cv-534-Oc-10GRJ
)
Civil Officer BERNIE SANDERS, Agent of the)
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders Principal )
Campaign Committee, A/K/A “Friends of )
Bernie Sanders,” et al, )
)
Defendants )

Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Recusal and to Withdraw Order

Plaintiffs hereby move the Honorable Wm. Terrell Hodges to immediately recuse

himself from presiding over this matter. Grounds for this Motion are:

1.

The Court lists Bank of America as his sole financial interest. See Exhibit I
attached hereto.

Bank of America has six committees (PACs) listed on the FEC.gov website
which contribute to campaigns of federal candidates, including many or all of
the “six legislators” who are defendants in this matter.

The Bank of America PACs are authorized by the FECA Law, 2 U.S.C. §432,
§434, §439, and §441i which Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges is unconstitutional.

Bank of America stock (ticker symbol BAC on the New York Stock
Exchange) is traded in tandem with WELLPOINT (WLP) stock in at least two
large holding companies, e.g. Berkshire Hathaway (ticker symbols BRK-A,
BRK-B) and IVV, an exchange traded fund. Plaintiffs’ Complaint claims
WELLPOINT as the source of bribes to three or more of the “six legislators”
who are Defendants in this matter. The Court’s rulings with regard to
WELLPOINT are likely to have an impact on the share prices of Bank of
America.

The Plaintiffs filed their initial pleadings on December 3, 2009. Those filings
were entered into the Court’s electronic case filing system at 1:04 p.m. on that



day. On the same day the Court entered its Order denying Plaintiffs
emergency requests. Included in the Order was a prejudicial characterization
of Plaintiffs’ Complaint, to wit: “...it does not appear...(2) that the Plaintiffs
have demonstrated a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits.”

Because of the apparent conflict of interest and an appearance of impropriety,

Plaintiffs also ask the Court to withdraw its Order of December 3, 2009. Concurrence of

opposing counsel is not possible since they have not yet entered an appearance.

Mailing Certification:

[hereby certify that a copy of this pleading
was mailed by First Class Postage to all

CER 9, 2009.

Pro Se Ptaintiff Steven E. Schonberg

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:

te Schonberg, Pro Se
7938 SE 12" Circle

Ocala, FL 34480
352-789-0610

Email: sschonberg@aol.com

Maribeth Schonberg, fo Se
60 Wilson Hill Road

Merrimack, NH 03054
352-789-9474
Email: maribethnh@aol.com


Senior United States District Judge William Terrell Hodges
List of Financial Interests

Bank of America

Exhibit I
§ 127.280 Construction and arrangement of quarters for crew members and accommodations for offshore workers. ( a ) The following requirements apply to quarters for crew members on each vessel of 100 or more gross tons: ( 1 ) Quarters for crew members must be divided into staterooms none of which berths more than four members.
( 2 ) Each stateroom for use by crew members must— ( i ) Have clear headroom of at least 1.9 meters (6 feet, 3 inches); and
( ii ) Contain at least 2.8 square meters (30 square feet) of deck and at least 6 cubic meters (210 cubic feet) of space for each member accommodated. The presence in a stateroom of equipment for use by the occupants does not diminish the area or volume of the room.
( 3 ) There must be at least one toilet, one washbasin, and one shower or bathtub for every eight or fewer crew members who do not occupy a stateroom to which a private or a semiprivate facility is attached.
( b ) The following requirements apply to accommodations for offshore workers on each vessel of 100 or more gross tons: ( 1 ) Each offshore worker aboard must be provided with adequate fixed seating. The width of each seat should be at least 460 millimeters (18 inches). The spacing of fixed seating must be sufficient to allow ready escape in case of fire or other emergency. The following are minimal requirements: ( i ) Aisles 4.6 meters (15 feet) in length or less must not be less than 610 millimeters (24 inches) wide.
( ii ) Aisles more than 4.6 meters (15 feet) in length must not be less than 760 millimeters (30 inches) wide.
( iii ) Where the seating is in rows, the distance from seat front to seat front must not be less than 760 millimeters (30 inches).
( 2 ) If the intended operation of a vessel is to carry offshore workers aboard for more than 24 hours, quarters for them must be provided. Each stateroom for use by them must— ( i ) Berth no more than six workers;
( ii ) Have clear headroom of at least 1.9 meters (6 feet, 3 inches); and
( iii ) Contain at least 1.9 square meters (20 square feet) of deck and at least 4 cubic meters (140 cubic feet) of space for each worker accommodated. The presence in a stateroom of equipment for use by the occupants does not diminish the area or volume of the room.
( 3 ) Toilets and washbasins for use by offshore workers must meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( c ) Each crew member and offshore worker aboard a vessel of less than 100 gross tons must be provided with accommodations of adequate size and construction, and with equipment for his or her protection and convenience suitable to the size, facilities, and service of the vessel.
( d ) For each vessel of 100 or more gross tons, the bulkheads and decks separating accommodations for crew members and offshore workers from machinery spaces must be of “A” Class construction as defined by § 92.07-5 of this chapter.
( e ) After reviewing the arrangement drawings required by § 127.110 of this part, the cognizant OCMI will determine, and record on the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, the number of offshore workers that the vessel may carry.