alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,107
<SECURITIES>                                     5,273
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                       346
<INVENTORY>                                      1,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,726
<PP&E>                                           4,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,665
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,561)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,686
<SALES>                                         16,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,290
<CGS>                                            7,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (4)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,791)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Remi Barbier, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and Peter S. Roddy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                            |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | 
| |  | Date: November 2, 2007                     |  | 
| |  |                                           
| |  | /S/    REMI BARBIER                        |  | 
| |  | Remi Barbier,                              |  | 
| |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors,        |  | 
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer      |  | 
| |  |                                           
| |  | /S/    PETER S. RODDY                      |  | 
| |  | Peter S. Roddy,                            |  | 
| |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

John Vrabel Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-12673

Commissioner of Social Security, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER 

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This is a social security appeal. On July 8, 2014, Plaintiff John Vrabel Jr. filed his Complaint

against the Commissioner of Social Security, appealing the Commissioner’s denial of his application

for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. (Doc. #1). 

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (Pl.’s Mo., Doc. #14; Def.’s Mo.,

Doc. #15). The motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk for issuance of a

Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). (Doc. #4). 

 On August 17, 2015, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) wherein he recommended that this Court GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment, DENY Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, REVERSE the Commissioner’s

decision and REMAND the case for further proceedings under sentence four. (R&R, Doc. #16). 

Pursuant to Civil Rule 72, a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by

a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with

a copy of the R&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). “The district judge must determine de novo any part

1

2:14-cv-12673-SFC-MJH Doc # 17 Filed 09/08/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 744
of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R and the time for doing so has passed. 

Furthermore, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Therefore, the Court

hereby ADOPTS the August 17, 2015 R&R. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. #14) is GRANTED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is

DENIED, the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: September 8, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

September 8, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-12673-SFC-MJH Doc # 17 Filed 09/08/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 745
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTAITILED 

PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF KAREN A. HAMMEL FOR 

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE 

BAR OF MONTANA 

NOV 0 2 2021 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State nf hAnntana 

ORDER 

Karen A. Hammel has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the 

State Bar of Montana. Hammel was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing 

to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending 

March 31, 2021. Hammel has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Hammel 

has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 

13 of the CLE Rules. The Petition states that Hammel is not currently subject to 

disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under 

the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Karen A. Hammel for reinstatement 

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining 

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Munson shall be reinstated. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this ?....-'-41ay of November, 2021. 

11/02/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
. 1i Ai ,t.11, 

Justices 

2
EX-10.4





 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO

 THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY TOP MANAGEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL 

RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN 

(Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2018) 

The J. M. Smucker Company hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to The J. M. Smucker Company Top Management Supplemental Retirement Benefit
Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2018) (the “Plan”). Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined. The provision of this Amendment No. 1
shall be effective as of the date of execution set forth below. 
 Section 1 

Section 8.12 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

	 	“8.12    [Reserved]”	 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan to be executed this 17th day of June, 2020. 

 

			
	THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jill R. Penrose

	Name:	 	Jill R. Penrose
	Title:	 	Chief People and Administrative Officer



  
 1
§ 126.110 Inspection after accident. ( a ) The owner or operator of an OSV shall make the vessel available for inspection by a marine inspector— ( 1 ) Each time an accident occurs, or a defect is discovered that affects— ( i ) The safety of the vessel; or
( ii ) The effectiveness or completeness of its lifesaving, fire-fighting, or other equipment; or
( 2 ) Whenever any important repairs or renewals are made.
( b ) The inspection is to ensure that— ( 1 ) The necessary repairs or renewals have been effectively made;
( 2 ) The material and workmanship used to accomplish the repairs or renewals are satisfactory; and
( 3 ) The OSV complies with the regulations in this subchapter.
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Edwin R. Lake agt. Arnold *&*Morse.

*Special Term at Chambers,*

*September,*1872.

*Mach surety*on a bond given by a non-resident plaintiff on commencement of an action must justify, if excepted to. The justification of one surety only is in sufficient.

*Before*Daly, *Ch. J.*

The action was commenced on a bond given under .the statute for a non-resident as security for costs in the case of *Sheldon*agt. Lake, in pursuance of an order made on motion.

The defendants, as sureties, signed the bond ; one justified by affidavit on being excepted to, and the other declined to justify. The bond was duly filed, but was not approved of.

As one of the defendants did not justify, an order was entered dismissing the action, “the plaintiff, a non-resident,not having filed security for costs.”

The defendant in that action now commences this action against the sureties, and the answer sets up the failure to file security for costs by the non-justification of one of the sureties on the bond, and the dismissal of the action for want of security as a defense.

The plaintiff now moves to strike out the defendants’ answer as frivojous, and for judgment.

M. M. Budlong *for the motion*.

T. C. Cronin *opposed,*

cited *Ward*agt. *Symes and others,*4 *Corns.,*171.

*333• Chas. P. Daly, *Ch. J.,*

.denied the motion, holding that the answer put in issue a material allegation as to the execution of the bond, and that within the above authority each surety must justify, and the bond be approved of; and the allegation in the answer, if true, constituted a defense; and that the practice required that the question of law be raised by demurrer, if the plaintiffs wished to proceed in the action.
§ 129.350 Batteries—general. ( a ) Wherever a battery is charged, there must be natural or induced ventilation to dissipate the gases generated.
( b ) Each battery must be located as high above the bilge as practicable within the space the battery is located in and be secured to protect against shifting due to roll, pitch, and heave motions or vibration of the vessel, and free from exposure to splash or spray of water.
( c ) Each battery must be accessible for maintenance and removal.
( d ) Each connection to a battery terminal must be made with a permanent connector, rather than with spring clips or other temporary clamps.
( e ) Each battery must be mounted in a tray lined with, or constructed of, lead or other material resistant to damage by the electrolyte.
( f ) Each battery charger must have an ammeter connected in the charging circuit.
( g ) Unless the battery is adjacent to its distribution panel or switchboard that distributes power to the lighting, motor, and appliance circuits, the battery leads must have fuses in series with and as close as practicable to the battery.
( h ) Each battery used for starting an engine must be located as close as possible to the engine or engines served.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10523 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.
SANTIAGO SANDOVAL, also known as Ramiro Sandoval, also known as Ramiro Amador Sandoval, also known as Sandoval Ramiro,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11 -CR- 132 -2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Santiago Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sandoval has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Sandoval ’s claims of ineffective assistance of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 26, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10523 Document: 00514009138 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2017No. 16

- 10523

2 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 ). Sandoval’s request for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sandoval ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 16-10523 Document: 00514009138 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/26/2017
#### § 77.2 Scope.

The regulations in this part apply to all recipient organizations under any program administered by the Department through which the organization receives Federal funds under a letter of credit.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for Private Business, Inc.
("Issuer") for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (a)      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.


         This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
the Issuer for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.

         This Certification is executed as of November 14, 2002.



                                            /s/ Thomas L. Black
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Thomas L. Black
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                            /s/ Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing
Owner of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                |  |                         |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 27, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin Rich |  |                        
|                        |  |  |  |                |  | Kevin Rich              |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |                |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
1

Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 5:14 PM

To: roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov; Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov)

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, 

Bob; Lovgren, Andrew C LCDR, NAVSUP FLCPH C700; Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC 

HI, EV4; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, 

PRJ412; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - April 14, 2015

Signed By: aaron.poentis@navy.mil

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of April 14, 2015.  In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan  

Action complete.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1 ‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

Action complete.

b. Action 2  ‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP‐8 free product is unknown.  Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration.  This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination.  Prepare models for petroleum JP‐8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.   

No change.   

c. Action 3 ‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP‐8 free product.  Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.   

No change.  

d. Action 4 ‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex.  This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.  

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.   

d.(1)  Groundwater Monitoring Wells

No change.

d.(2)  Site Characterization  
2

No change.   

d.(3)  AOC/SOW  

Discussions are ongoing.

d.(4)  Request for Additional Information  

No change.

d.(5)  BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study

No change.   

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

v/r,

Aaron
§ 140.665 Inspection and testing required when making alterations, repairs, or other such operations involving riveting, welding, burning, or like fire-producing actions. ( a ) The inspections and issuance of certificates required by this section must be conducted in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 306 (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter) before alterations, repairs, or other operations involving riveting, welding, burning, or other fire producing actions may be made aboard a vessel.
( b ) Until an inspection has been made to determine that such operation can be undertaken with safety, no alterations, repairs, or other such operations involving riveting, welding, burning, or like fire-producing actions must be made: ( 1 ) Within or on the boundaries of cargo tanks which have been used to carry combustible liquid or chemicals in bulk;
( 2 ) Within or on the boundaries of fuel tanks; or,
( 3 ) To pipe lines, heating coils, pumps, fittings, or other appurtenances connected to such cargo or fuel tanks.
( c ) Such inspections must be made and evidenced as follows: ( 1 ) In ports or places in the United States or its territories and possessions the inspection must be made by a marine chemist certificated by the National Fire Protection Association. However, if the services of such certified marine chemist are not reasonably available, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), upon the recommendation of the vessel owner and his or her contractor or their representative, must select a person who, in the case of an individual vessel, must be authorized to make such inspection. If the inspection indicated that such operations can be undertaken with safety, a certificate setting forth the fact in writing and qualified as may be required, must be issued by the certified marine chemist or the authorized person before the work is started. Such qualifications must include any requirements as may be deemed necessary to maintain the safe conditions in the spaces certified throughout the operation and must include such additional tests and certifications as considered required. Such qualifications and requirements must include precautions necessary to eliminate or minimize hazards that may be present from protective coatings or residues from cargoes.
( 2 ) When not in such a port or place, and a marine chemist or such person authorized by the OCMI, is not reasonably available, the inspection must be made by the master or person in charge and a proper entry must be made in the vessel's logbook.
( d ) The master or person in charge must secure copies of certificates issued by the certified marine chemist or such person authorized by the OCMI. The master or person in charge must maintain a safe condition on the vessel by full observance of all qualifications and requirements listed by the marine chemist or person authorized by the OCMI in the certificate.