alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2173 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, 

as the ‘‘Carl B. Smith Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2173 EH

1 SECTION 1. CARL B. SMITH POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1009 Crystal Road in Island 

4 Falls, Maine, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Carl 

5 B. Smith Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Carl B. Smith Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2173 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice’’. Falls, Maine, as the ‘‘Carl B. Smith Post Of- al Service located at 1009 Crystal Road in Island
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2173 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2173

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, as the ``Carl B. Smith 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2009

   Mr. Michaud (for himself and Ms. Pingree of Maine) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, as the ``Carl B. Smith 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARL B. SMITH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Carl B. Smith Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carl B. 
Smith Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 605.35 Evaluation and placement. ( a ) *Preplacement evaluation.* A recipient that operates a public elementary or secondary education program or activity shall conduct an evaluation in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section of any person who, because of handicap, needs or is believed to need special education or related services before taking any action with respect to the initial placement of the person in regular or special education and any subsequent significant change in placement.
( b ) *Evaluation procedures.* A recipient to which this subpart applies shall establish standards and procedures for the evaluation and placement of persons who, because of handicap, need or are believed to need special education or related services which ensure that: ( 1 ) Tests and other evaluation materials have been validated for the specific purpose for which they are used and are administered by trained personnel in conformance with the instructions provided by their producer;
( 2 ) Tests and other evaluation materials include those tailored to assess specific areas of educational need and not merely those which are designed to provide a single general intelligence quotient; and
( 3 ) Tests are selected and administered so as best to ensure that, when a test is administered to a student with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, the test results accurately reflect the student's aptitude or achievement level or whatever other factor the test purports to measure, rather than reflecting the student's impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills (except where those skills are the factors that the test purports to measure).
( c ) *Placement procedures.* In interpreting evaluation data and in making placement decisions, a recipient shall ( 1 ) draw upon information from a variety of sources, including aptitude and achievement tests, teacher recommendations, physical condition, social or cultural background, and adaptive behavior,
( 2 ) establish procedures to ensure that information obtained from all such sources is documented and carefully considered,
( 3 ) ensure that the placement decision is made by a group of persons, including persons knowledgeable about the child, the meaning of the evaluation data, and the placement options, and
( 4 ) ensure that the placement decision is made in conformity with § 605.34.
( d ) *Reevaluation.* A recipient to which this section applies shall establish procedures, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, for periodic reevaluation of students who have been provided special education and related services. A reevaluation procedure consistent with the Education for the Handicapped Act is one means of meeting this requirement.
[47 FR 8573, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51381, Aug. 26, 2003]
§ 140.510 Identification and mitigation of health and safety hazards. ( a ) The owner or managing operator must implement procedures to identify and mitigate health and safety hazards, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Tools and equipment, including deck machinery, rigging, welding and cutting, hand tools, ladders, and abrasive wheel machinery found on board the vessel;
( 2 ) Slips, trips, and falls;
( 3 ) Working aloft;
( 4 ) Hazardous materials;
( 5 ) Confined space entry;
( 6 ) Blood-borne pathogens and other biological hazards;
( 7 ) Electrical;
( 8 ) Noise;
( 9 ) Falls overboard;
( 10 ) Vessel embarkation and disembarkation (including pilot transfers);
( 11 ) Towing gear, including winches, capstans, wires, hawsers and other related equipment;
( 12 ) Personal hygiene;
( 13 ) Sanitation and safe food handling; and
( 14 ) Potable water supply.
( b ) As far as practicable, the owner or managing operator must implement other types of safety control measures before relying on Personal Protective Equipment. These controls may include administrative, engineering, source modification, substitution, process change or controls, isolation, ventilation, or other controls.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20160 Conference Calendar

JOHN THOMAS BAGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-697

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Thomas Bagley, Texas prisoner # 652853, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. Bagley does not suggest that the district court erred by construing his complaint as naming Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Director Gary Johnson as the sole defendant. Thus, to the extent that his complaint alleged claims against any other defendant, Bagley has abandoned those claims. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2dNo. 97-20160 -2- 222, 223-24 (5th Cir. 1993); F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a)(6). Bagley does not allege any personal action by TDCJ Director Johnson. Therefore the dismissal of the complaint was within the discretion of the district court. Williams v. Luna , 909 F.2d 121, 123 (5th Cir. 1990); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). The appeal is frivolous, being without arguable merit, and it is therefore DISMISSED. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s and this court’s dismissals as frivolous count as two “strikes” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
DISMISSED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KIZZY NICKERSON,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-CV-13255

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

JESSICA TAYLOR,

Defendant.

___________________/

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

This matter is presently before the Court on plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court shall (1) grant the application and therefore allow the

complaint to be filed without prepayment of the filing fee, and (2) dismiss the complaint because

it is frivolous and/or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court may permit a person to commence a

lawsuit without prepaying the filing fee, provided the person submits an affidavit demonstrating that

he/she “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” In the present case, plaintiff’s

application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing of indigence. The Court shall

therefore grant the application and permit the complaint to be filed without requiring plaintiff to

prepay the filing fee.

Pro se complaints are held to “less stringent standards” than those drafted by lawyers.

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nonetheless, the Court is required by statute to dismiss

an in forma pauperis complaint if it 

(i) is frivolous or malicious;

(ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or 

2:14-cv-13255-BAF-DRG Doc # 6 Filed 08/26/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 15
(iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from

such relief.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A complaint is frivolous if “it lacks an arguable basis either in law or

in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). To avoid dismissal for failure to state a

claim, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief

that is plausible on its face.” Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Napolitano, 648 F.3d 365, 369

(6th Cir. 2011) (citations and internal quotations omitted). Further, the Court is required to dismiss

the complaint, whether or not plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, if the court lacks subject

matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 

 In the present case, the complaint is entirely illegible and incomprehensible. It makes

no sense whatsoever and gives no hint as to the nature of the allegations or claims, the identity of

the parties, a jurisdictional basis, or the relief sought. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

is granted. The complaint is filed and the filing fee need not be prepaid.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B).

S/ Bernard A. Friedman________________

Dated: August 26, 2014 BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

Detroit, Michigan SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

2:14-cv-13255-BAF-DRG Doc # 6 Filed 08/26/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Tina L. Coffman,

Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NUMBER: 14-13801

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HLUCHANIUK

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 18, 2015, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued a Report and

Recommendation [Doc.19], recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [Doc. 17] be Denied and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

16] be GRANTED and the matter be REMANDED. Neither party filed objections

within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. 

Defendant’s motion is DENIED and Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED and the

matter is REMANDED for proceeds in accordance with the Report and

Recommendation.

Judgment of Remand will enter.

IT IS ORDERED.

S/Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: December 21, 2015

2:14-cv-13801-VAR-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 12/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 795
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

December 21, 2015.

S/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2

2:14-cv-13801-VAR-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 12/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 796
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual periodended July 3, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.                                        /s/ NANCY PEDOT          Nancy Pedot   *Chief Executive Officer*   
Dated: September 14, 2004
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JACK MANN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 14-13439 

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [50]; DENYING AS MOOT 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [22] 

 On September 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [1] against former 

defendants Douglas Straub, Hillary Calvird, and Michael Calvird. On February 6, 

2015, the former defendants filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 

the Complaint [19]. The Court granted the motion on February 19, 2015. On 

February 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment [22] against the 

former defendants. On April 8, 2015, the Court issued an Order [30] reflecting that 

the United States had been substituted for the former defendants as the sole 

defendant in this case. On May 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation [50] recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for 

2:14-cv-13439-AJT-RSW Doc # 60 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 674
2 

Default Judgment [22] as moot. Neither party filed an objection to the Report and 

Recommendation. 

 The Court having reviewed the record, the Report and Recommendation [50] 

is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [22] against 

former defendants Straub, Calvird, and Calvird is DENIED AS MOOT. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

 Arthur J. Tarnow 

Dated: July 23, 2015 Senior United States District Judge 

2:14-cv-13439-AJT-RSW Doc # 60 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 675
Exhibit 32.1



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer




May 16, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment Program--Meeting 2.
    Date: May 3-4, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ellen S. Buczko, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2676. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#41242334223b2a2e70012f282028256f2f28296f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16737463756c7d792756787f777f7238787f7e38717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1682 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|   | (1) | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Next 1 Interactive,      Inc.  |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 8, 2010 | /s/ Richard      Sokolowski      |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Richard      Sokolowski          |   |
|                    | Principal      Financial Officer |   |

----
§ 108.555 Lifeboat launching and recovery arrangements. Lifeboat launching and recovery arrangements, in addition to meeting the requirements in §§ 108.550 and 108.553, must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Each lifeboat must be capable of being launched with the unit making headway of 5 knots in calm water, or with the unit anchored or bearing on the bottom in a current of up to 5 knots. A painter may be used to meet this requirement.
( b ) Each lifeboat must be provided with a launching appliance. The launching appliance must be capable of launching and recovering the lifeboat with its crew.
( c ) Each launching appliance arrangement must allow the operator on the unit to observe the lifeboat at all times during recovery.
( d ) Each launching appliance arrangement must be designed to ensure persons can safely disembark from the survival craft prior its stowage.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25291, May 20, 1996; 61 FR 40281, Aug. 1, 1996]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 51843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21019]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7994]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Plants of Virtue and Rocks by a Stream'' by Shitao

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 14, 2012, notice was published on pages 48582-3 of 
the Federal Register (volume 77, number 157) of determinations made by 
the Department of State pertaining to the object ``Plants of Virtue and 
Rocks by a Stream'' by Shitao. The referenced notice is corrected here 
to change the name of the exhibition in which that object will appear 
to ``The Artful Recluse: Painting, Poetry, and Politics in 17th-Century 
China''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
listing of the exhibit object, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 21, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21019 Filed 8-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```