alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 400.100 General eligibility requirements. ( a ) Eligibility for refugee medical assistance is limited to those refugees who— ( 1 ) Are ineligible for Medicaid or SCHIP but meet the financial eligibility standards under § 400.101;
( 2 ) Meet immigration status and identification requirements in subpart D of this part or are the dependent children of, and part of the same assistance unit as, individuals who meet the requirements in subpart D, subject to the limitation in § 400.208 of this part with respect to nonrefugee children;
( 3 ) Meet eligibility requirements and conditions in this subpart;
( 4 ) Provide the name of the resettlement agency which resettled them; and
( 5 ) Are not full-time students in institutions of higher education, as defined by the Director, except where such enrollment is approved by the State, or its designee, as part of an individual employability plan for a refugee under § 400.79 of this part or a plan for an unaccompanied minor in accordance with § 400.112.
( b ) A refugee may be eligible for refugee medical assistance under this subpart during a period of time to be determined by the Director in accordance with § 400.211.
( c ) The State agency may not require that a refugee actually receive or apply for refugee cash assistance as a condition of eligibility for refugee medical assistance.
( d ) All recipients of refugee cash assistance who are not eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP are eligible for refugee medical assistance.
[45 FR 59323, Sept. 9, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 46090, Sept. 1, 1993; 58 FR 64507, Dec. 8, 1993; 60 FR 33603, June 28, 1995; 65 FR 15449, Mar. 22, 2000]
§ 137.130 Program for vessel compliance for the Towing Safety Management System (TSMS) option. The owner or managing operator of a towing vessel choosing to use the TSMS option must implement an external or internal survey program for vessel compliance. The program for vessel compliance can be either: ( a ) An external survey program, in which the owner or managing operator would have a third-party organization (TPO) conduct either the surveys required by § 137.205, the examinations required by § 137.310, or both; or
( b ) An internal survey program, in which the owner or managing operator would conduct either the surveys required by § 137.210, the examinations required by § 137.315, or both, using internal resources or contracted surveyors. The internal survey program would be conducted with the oversight of a TPO.
( c ) Each program of either type must include: ( 1 ) Owner or managing operator policy regarding the surveying and examination of towing vessels;
( 2 ) Procedures for conducting towing vessel surveys and examinations, as described in this part;
( 3 ) Procedures for reporting and correcting non-conformities and deficiencies;
( 4 ) Identification of the individual or individuals responsible for the management of the program, and their qualifications; and
( 5 ) Documentation of compliance activities.
§ 84.86 Conforming alternate versions. ( a ) A recipient may use conforming alternate versions of web content, as defined by WCAG 2.1, to comply with § 84.84 only where it is not possible to make web content directly accessible due to technical or legal limitations.
( b ) WCAG 2.1 is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All material approved for incorporation by reference is available for inspection at HHS and at NARA. Contact HHS, OCR at: Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Ave. SW, Room 509F, HHH Building, Washington, DC 20201; phone: (202) 545-4884; email: *504@hhs.gov .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative (“WAI”), 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880; phone: (339) 273-2711; email: *contact@w3.org ;* website: *www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-WCAG21-20180605/* and *https://perma.cc/UB8A-GG2F .*
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Human BioSystems (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended September 30, 2008  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2008

/s/Harry Masuda

Harry Masuda

Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### § 111.97-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to electric power-operated watertight door systems required under Subpart H of Part 170 of this chapter.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51008, Nov. 4, 1983]
[No. 3448.]

#### Hendrie et al. v. Acorn Gold Mining Co. et al.

*Appeals*— Appeal *Doclcetecl as a Writ of Error.*In an appeal to the supreme court in a cause where no appeal was allowed by law, the appellee appeared and filed his brief and the *418cause was ready for final Rearing. In tliis condition it was transferred to this court. On motion to dismiss, the appeal was docketed as a writ of error, under sec. 423, Rev. Code.

*Appeal from El Paso District Court.*Hon. J. *W.*Sheafor, Judge.

Mr. Tully Scott, County Attorney, Messrs. Thomas, Bryant *&*Malburn, and Mr. Gr. P. Nevitt, for appellants.

Mr. H. Frost and Messrs. Schuyler & Schuyler, for appellees.

*Per curiam.*

This appeal was taken by appellants, who were respectively the county treasurer of Teller county, and the board of county commissioners of the same county, from a final decree annulling certain tax sales of mining property belonging to appellees, and the certificates of purchase issued thereon, and enjoining the execution of treasurer’s deeds for said property. The abstract-of the record, together with the briefs of appellants and appellees, were filed, and the cause was ready for final hearing, in the supreme court, at the time the order was made transferring the cause to this court under chapter 107, session laws of 1911. Afterwards, appellees filed their motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting that the judgment was not one which could be taken to the supreme court by appeal. Appellants moved to strike the motion of appellees from the files, for the reasons, as claimed, that this court is without authority to entertain such motion, after full appearance in the supreme court and submission to its jurisdiction by appellees, and that the latter are, for the same reason, estopped to question the jurisdic*419tion on appeal. Counsel for appellants have not contested the claim of their opponents that there was no right of appeal from this judgment to the supreme court under section 388, Mills. Ann. Code (sec. 422 Rev. Code, 1908), and the position of appellees in that regard is affirmed by the court. On the other hand, we cannot assent to the grounds of appellants’ motion to strike, without running counter to previous decisions of this court, including the cases of *Western Lumber & Pole Co. v. Golden,*and *Colorado M. & M. Co. v. Rocky Mountain National Bank,*recently decided. In conformity with the rulings in the cases last mentioned, the motion of appellants must be denied, and the motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal will be sustained, provided, and it is further ordered, that the clerk of this court enter the cause as pending on writ of error, in the manner and with the effect, as provided in section 423, code of civil procedure, Rev. Stat. 1908, and that this cause be set down for final hearing, as upon writ of error.

IIurlbut, Judge, concurs in the dismissal of the appeal, but dissents from the order entering the cause as pending on writ of error.

Scott, Presiding Judge, having been of counsel, does not participate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware 

corporation, and FORD GLOBAL 

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Delaware 

Limited Liability Company, 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim Defendants, 

v. 

AUTEL US INC, a New York corporation, 

and AUTEL INTELLIGENT 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, a Chinese 

corporation, 

Case No. 14-13760 

Hon. Terrence G. Berg 

Defendants and 

Counter Claimants, 

v. 

INNOVA ELECTRONICS, CORP., a 

California corporation, 

Counterclaim Defendant. 

ORDER 

In its Order of February 24, 2017, the Court noted that it had been advised that 

the parties were making progress in settlement negotiations and expressed its 

encouragement to the parties to redouble their efforts and work swiftly to finalize an 

agreement. Dkt. 103, Pg. IDs 3548-3549. Today, counsel for Ford and Autel 

communicated by telephone to the Court’s Case Manager that they have reached a 

settlement and that they wished to be relieved of their obligations to meet the Court’s 

scheduling order regarding motions briefing. In consideration of the foregoing, the 

4:14-cv-13760-TGB-MJH Doc # 105 Filed 02/28/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3555
2

parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint notice of settlement by no later than 

5:00 p.m. Wednesday, March 1, 2017. The parties must then submit a stipulated order 

of dismissal by Thursday, March 16, 2017, otherwise the Court will dismiss the case 

sua sponte and will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement. 

If the parties are unable to submit a joint notice of settlement by the required 

deadline, Autel must instead file its response to Ford’s motion for summary judgment 

by 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, March 1, 2017. This constitutes a one-day extension of the 

Court’s previous scheduling order. If no joint notice of settlement is filed, Ford must 

still submit its reply by Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 11:59p.m. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 28, 2017 s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on February 28, 

2017, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties. 

 s/A. Chubb 

Case Manager 

4:14-cv-13760-TGB-MJH Doc # 105 Filed 02/28/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3556
#### § 81.61 Who presides.

A hearing examiner assigned under 5 U.S.C. 3105 or 3344 (formerly section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act) shall preside over the taking of evidence in any hearing to which these rules of procedure apply.
#### Louisa Schwalenberg et al., Appellants, *v.*Margaret M. Dunn et al., Respondents.

*Schwalenberg*v. *Dunn,*124 App. Div. 909, «firmed.

(Submitted November 19, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 29, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to set aside a sale in foreclosure.

*F. J. Moissen*and *George Gree*for appellants.

*David B. Ogden*and *Philip S. Dean*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1996 

To prohibit the inclusion of earmarks in the Intelligence Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. MCCOTTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select Committee on 

Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

A BILL 

To prohibit the inclusion of earmarks in the Intelligence 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON INCLUSION OF EARMARKS IN 

4 THE INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—No earmarks shall be included in 

7 the enactment of a bill authorizing intelligence activities 

8 for fiscal year 2010. 

9 (b) EARMARK DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘‘earmark’’ means a provision or report language proVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:02 Apr 23, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1996.IH H1996

smartinez on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1996 IH

1 viding, authorizing, or recommending a specific amount of 

2 discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other 

3 spending authority for a contract, loan, loan guarantee, 

4 grant, loan authority, or other expenditure targeted to a 

5 specific State, locality, or congressional district, other than 

6 through a statutory or administrative formula-driven or 

7 competitive award process. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 900.403 Supplemental EIS. ( a ) Supplements to either draft or final EISs shall be prepared, as prescribed in 40 CFR 1502.9, when the Commission finds that there are substantial changes are proposed in a project that are relevant to environmental concerns; or when there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts.
( b ) Where Commission action remains to be taken and the EIS is more than three years old, the Commission will review the EIS to determine whether it is adequate or requires supplementation.
( c ) The Commission shall prepare, circulate and file a supplement to an EIS in the same fashion (exclusive of scoping) as a draft and final EIS. In addition, the supplement and accompanying administrative record shall be included in the administrative record for the proposal. When an applicant is involved, the applicant shall, under the direction of the approving official, provide assistance.
( d ) An NOI to prepare a supplement to a final EIS will be published in those cases where a ROD has already been issued.
#### The Typothetæ of the City of New York, Respondent, *v.*Typographical Union No. 6 et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Punishment of Patrick H. McCormick et al., Appellants, for Criminal Contempt

*Typothetm of the Gity of New York*v. *Typographical Union No. 6,*132 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued October 8, 1909;

decided November 30, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *572May 25, 1909, "which affirmed an order of Special Term adjudging the appellants herein guilty of criminal contempt.

*Alfred J. Talley*for appellants.

*!’Robert C. Beatty*for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting on memorandum of Laughlin, J., in court below: Willard Bartlett, J
§ 115.700 Permission for repairs and alterations. ( a ) Repairs or alterations to the hull, machinery, or equipment that affect the safety of the vessel must not be made without the approval of the cognizant OCMI, except during an emergency. When repairs are made during an emergency, the owner, managing operator, or master shall notify the OCMI as soon as practicable after such repairs or alterations are made. Repairs or alterations that affect the safety of the vessel include, but are not limited to, the: replacement, repair, or refastening of deck or hull planking, plating, and structural members; repair of plate or frame cracks; damage repair or replacement, other than replacement in kind, of electrical wiring, fuel lines, tanks, boilers and other pressure vessels, and steering, propulsion and power supply systems; alterations affecting stability; and repair or alteration of livesaving, fire detecting, or fire extinguishing equipment.
( b ) The owner or managing operator shall submit drawings, sketches, or written specifications describing the details of any proposed alterations to the cognizant OCMI. Proposed alterations must be approved by the OCMI before work is started.
( c ) Drawings are not required to be submitted for repairs or replacements in kind.
( d ) The OCMI may require an inspection and testing whenever a repair or alteration is undertaken.
null

580.70746
EX-31.01


CERTIFICATION

I, Harry Masuda, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Human
BioSystems;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)] for the registrant and we have:

a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c.      disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Harry Masuda
------------------
Harry Masuda
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.14


 


BRILLIANT ACQUISITION


99 Dan Ba Road C-9 | Putuo | Shanghai | China
| Tel.: (86) 021-80125497


 


Nisun Investment Holding Limited


99 Dan Ba Road, C-9 Putuo District,


Shanghai, Peoples


Republic of China 200062


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”)
of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)
for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Brilliant Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s
liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), Nisun Investment Holding Limited (“Nisun”) shall make available to the Company certain
office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 99 Dan Ba
Road, C-9 Putuo District, Shanghai, Peoples, Republic of China 200062, (or any successor location) in return for the indirect benefit
of supporting the business of the Company as one of its shareholders.


 


Nisun hereby agrees that it does not have
any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements
with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever. No party hereto may assign either
this letter agreement or any of its rights, interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other
party. Any purported assignment in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer
or assign any interest or title to the purported assignee.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BRILLIANT ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name: 	Dr. Peng Jiang
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


NISUN INVESTMENT HOLDING LIMITED


 


	By:	 	 
	Name: 	Bodang Liu	 
	Title:	Sole Director
Exhibit



	
			
	 
	 
	Exhibit 10.1

	 
	 
	







June 18, 2020




Vincent D. Kelly
c/o Spok Holdings, Inc.
6850 Versar Drive, Suite 420
Springfield, Virginia 22151‐4148




		
	Re: 
	Extension of Employment Agreement Term






Dear Vince:


Reference is made to that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 3, 2019 by and between you and Spok Holdings, Inc. (the “Employment Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.
This letter confirms our agreement to extend the Agreement Term of the Employment Agreement as set forth in Section 3 thereof to December 31, 2022.
Except as expressly set forth herein all of the terms of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
Thank you for your continued service with the Company.




	
		
	 
	Very truly yours,


SPOK HOLDINGS, INC.




By: /s/ Sharon Woods Keisling
      Name: Sharon Woods Keisling  
Title:   Corporate Secretary & Treasurer


















	
			
	 
	 
	Exhibit 10.1

	 
	 
	











Acknowledged, agreed and accepted as of June 18, 2020:
	
		
	/s/ Vincent D. Kelly
	 

	Vincent D. Kelly
§ 111.105-43 Paint stowage or mixing spaces. A space for the stowage or mixing of paint must not have any electric equipment, except: ( a ) Intrinsically safe electric equipment approved for a Class I, Division 1, Group D (Zone 0 or Zone 1) location;
( b ) Explosionproof electric equipment approved for a Class I, Division 1, Group D (Zone 0 or Zone 1) location; or
( c ) Through runs of marine shipboard cable.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28285, June 4, 1996; 62 FR 23909, May 1, 1997]