May 1998 Federal Election Commission Volume 24, Number 5

Table of Contents

Publications

1 Latest Disclosure Directory of

Federal and State Election Offices

Available

2 Internet Guide for Election

Offices Available

Budget

1 FEC Asks Congress for Funding

to Increase Investigative Force

Court Cases

3 Stockman v. FEC

3 Advisory Opinions

Reports

3 New Mexico Special General

Election Reporting

Statistics

4 Year-End Reports from National

Party Committees Show GOP Still

Leads in Money Race

6 FEC Faxline Menu

7 Index

Publications Budget

Latest Disclosure Directory

of Federal and State Election

Offices Available

The Combined Federal/State

Disclosure and Election Directory

1998, which lists national and state

offices responsible for public

disclosure of financial- and electionrelated filings for candidates and

officeholders, is now available.

The publication contains information concerning state responsibilities

in the areas of campaign finances,

candidates on the ballot, election

results, lobbying, personal finances,

public financing, spending on state

initiatives and other financial filings.

This year’s edition of the annual

directory includes an expanded list of

national associations concerned with

election administration. The directory also includes e-mail and home

page addresses for agencies that have

a presence on the Internet. Agencies

with on-line access to the FEC’s

database are noted.

The directory is available at the

FEC’s web site—http://

www.fec.gov—and includes links to

many of the other agencies listed in

the publication. The web edition of

the directory will be updated periodically throughout the year. The

directory is also available on 3.5 inch

diskettes for $3. Paper copies of the

(continued on page 2)

FEC Asks Congress for

Funding to Increase

Investigative Force

With a mounting caseload of

investigations containing allegations

of campaign finance improprieties,

FEC Vice Chairman Scott Thomas

advised Congress that “the time has

come to, in essence, put more cops

on the beat.”

Mr. Thomas, who also heads the

agency’s finance committee, testified

before the House Appropriations

Subcommittee on Treasury, Postal

Service and General Government at a

budget hearing March 19. He

presented the committee with the

FEC’s fiscal year 1999 budget

request of $36.5 million and told the

panel that the Commission would use

the money to hire more staff to deal

with the increased enforcement

caseload. “Our main message is

simple: we need more staff to do a

better job of ensuring compliance

with existing laws,” he said.

The budget request, if approved,

would amount to a 15 percent

increase over the FEC’s current

budget of $31.6 million and would

allow the FEC to increase its work

force to 360 staff members, adding

47 positions. Thirty-seven of those

positions would bolster the

Commission’s compliance program.

(continued on page 2)
Federal Election Commission RECORD May 1998

2

Federal Election Commission

999 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20463

800/424-9530

202/694-1100

202/501-3413 (FEC Faxline)

202/219-3336 (TDD for the

 hearing impaired)

800/877-8339 (FIRS)

Joan D. Aikens, Chairman

Scott E. Thomas, Vice Chairman

Lee Ann Elliott, Commissioner

Danny L. McDonald,

 Commissioner

John Warren McGarry,

 Commissioner

John C. Surina, Staff Director

Lawrence M. Noble, General

 Counsel

Published by the Information

 Division

Louise D. Wides, Director

Angela Rucker, Editor

http://www.fec.gov

1998 edition, which are free, can be

ordered from the Public Records

office by calling 800/424-9530 (press

3) or 202/694-1120. ✦

Publications

(continued from page 1)

Budget

(continued from page 1)

Internet Guide for Election

Offices Available

The latest publication from the

FEC’s Office of Election Administration is a guide for state and local

election offices on how to put

campaign finance information on

the Internet. Innovations in Election

Administration 16: Using the

Internet in Election Offices provides

a primer on the Internet’s history

and frequently-used terms. It also

discusses the benefits for state and

local election offices that set up sites

on the web. People requesting

information by telephone can be

directed to the web site. According

to the publication, many callers with

web access actually prefer this

method to faxing.

Mr. Thomas acknowledged that

in recent years congressional budget

committees have required the FEC

to use funding increases to improve

its computerization efforts and make

campaign finance data more readily

accessible to the public. He stated

that, while the Commission has

endorsed that approach, “it is

imperative to have both modern

technology and more staff if the

laws on the books are to mean

anything.” He added: “Without

adequate staff to enforce existing

disclosure requirements and contribution restrictions, reliable disclosure will fade, and contributions of

any amount from any source may

become the norm.”

Mr. Thomas listed several causes

for concern:

The publication also lists the

steps for setting up a web page—

from securing the proper hardware

to presenting data in an attractive

fashion. The document includes

information about outfitting the web

site with voter registration instructions and voter education materials,

and it provides a number of Internet

addresses for state and local election

web pages that may prove useful as

models.

For those who run into difficulties, there is a section that addresses

common problems and suggests online and community resources that

can provide assistance.

The appendices include a collection of listservs and Internet mailing

lists for organizations involved with

election administration and government issues.

Copies of the publication are

available from the election administration office (call 800/424-9530,

press 5 and ask to be transferred to

the office). ✦

• The perception among the regulated community and the public is

that there are too many committees

bending or breaking campaign

finance laws without reservation.

“Part of the problem seems to be a

growing awareness that the Federal

Election Commission simply

cannot handle all of the enforcement cases placed in its lap,” Mr.

Thomas said.

• The FEC can assign the equivalent

of only 24 attorneys to its pending

case load (162 cases involving

over 1,500 respondents as of

March 2). By comparison, the

Department of Justice reportedly

has 125 staffers conducting its

investigation into campaign

finance irregularities during the

1996 election cycle.

• The number of respondents in

administrative complaints reported

to the FEC has grown dramatically. For example, while the

average pending caseloads in 1995

and 1997 stayed the same, the

number of respondents in those

cases grew from 1,636 in 1995 to

2,039 in 1997, an almost 25

percent jump. Five of the

Commission’s current cases

involve a total of 222 respondents.

These five cases alone are anticipated to generate more than 2

million pages of documents. “We

do not think this is an anomaly; it

is indicative of a long-term trend,”

Mr. Thomas said.

• Recent court decisions have made

the resolution of enforcement cases

more staff intensive for the FEC.

The U.S. Supreme Court decision

in FEC v. Colorado Republican

Federal Campaign Committee, for

example, has forced FEC staff to

investigate whether party committees coordinate their activities with

their own candidates.

“The heart of our request is a plea

to beef up our compliance program,” Mr. Thomas said.

A news release about the FEC’s

budget request is available at http://

www.fec.gov. ✦
May 1998 Federal Election Commission RECORD

3

Advisory

Opinions

Advisory Opinion Requests

Advisory opinion requests are

available for review and comment in

the Public Records Office.

AOR 1998-6

Restricted class status of executive

and administrative personnel of

foreign corporation and its domestic

subsidiaries (Bacardi-Martini USA,

Inc., March 24, 1998; 9 pages)

AOR 1998-7

Application of FECA exemption for

political party office building fund

to construction of multiple state

party office facilities and adjacent

public parking lot (Pennsylvania

Democratic Party, April 3, 1998; 9

pages)

AOR 1998-8

Preemption of Iowa law prohibiting

corporate contributions to party

building fund (Iowa Democratic

Party, April 7, 1998; 4 pages plus 7-

page attachment) ✦

Court Cases

Stockman v. FEC

On March 27, the U.S. Court of

Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sustained a lower court’s ruling in this

case for the FEC, but it based the

dismissal on lack of jurisdiction

rather than on the merits.

Former Congressman Stephen E.

Stockman was a respondent in an

administrative complaint the FEC

received concerning a newspaper

that was published at Mr.

Stockman’s residence and campaign

headquarters during the 1994

primary election season. In February

1996, Mr. Stockman asked the U.S.

District Court for the Eastern

District of Texas, Beaumont Division, to direct the FEC to dismiss

the administrative complaint

because, among other reasons, the

FEC allegedly had unreasonably

delayed its investigation and FEC

personnel allegedly had leaked

information about the investigation

to the press, in violation of statutory

and regulatory confidentiality

requirements.

In decisions rendered in June and

August 1996, the district court

rejected Mr. Stockman’s arguments.

While the district court found that it

had jurisdiction over the delay

claim, it ruled that the delay in the

investigation was not unreasonable

in light of the FEC’s work load and

lack of resources. The district court

dismissed Mr. Stockman’s breachof-confidentiality claim for lack of

jurisdiction because Mr. Stockman

had failed to follow FEC procedures

for resolving such a claim. In the

alternative, the court found that

there was no factual basis for Mr.

Stockman’s allegations of press

leaks by the FEC. See page 2 of the

October 1996 Record. Mr. Stockman then appealed the case.

The appellate court, citing 2

U.S.C. §437g(a)(8), concluded that

the Federal Election Campaign Act

(the Act) does not create a cause of

action for a delay claim by an

administrative respondent (as

opposed to the person who files the

complaint). Section 437g(a)(8), the

court pointed out, states that only an

administrative complainant who is

aggrieved by the FEC’s failure to

act may petition for judicial relief,

and then only in the U.S. District

Court for the District of Columbia.

The court further held that Mr.

Stockman’s delay claim could not

be based on the Administrative

Procedure Act, which does not

apply where the underlying statute

precludes judicial review. The court

found that the Act precludes judicial

review of delay claims by plaintiffs,

like Mr. Stockman, who were not

administrative complainants and did

not file suit in the District of Columbia. The district court therefore

lacked jurisdiction, the court of

appeals held, over Mr. Stockman’s

delay claim.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Fifth Circuit, 96-40994; U.S.

District Court for the Eastern

District of Texas, Beaumont Division, 1:95-CV-1049. ✦

New Mexico Special General Election Reporting

 Committees1 involved in the June 23 Special Election to fill the 1st

Congressional District seat held by the late Congressman Steve Schiff must

follow the reporting schedule below. Note that 48-hour notices are required of

authorized committees that receive contributions (including loans) of $1,000

or more between June 4 and June 20.

Pre-General

July Quarterly

Post-General

Close of Certified/ Filing

Books Registered Date

Mail Date

June 3 June 8 June 11

July 13 July 23 July 23

1

 These committees include authorized committees of candidates running in

the election and other political committees that support these candidates and

do not file monthly.

---- Waived ----
Federal Election Commission RECORD May 1998

4

Statistics

Year-End Reports from

National Party Committees

Show GOP Still Leads in

Money Race

Heading into the final stretch of

the congressional mid-term election

cycle, Republican national committees have outpaced their Democratic

counterparts in federal contributions

by a large margin. While the tallies

in soft money were more comparable, Republican committees bested

the Democrats in raising nonfederal

funds as well, according to YearEnd reports for 1997.

The Republican national committees—consisting of the Republican

National Committee, National

Republican Senatorial Committee

and National Republican Congressional Committee—and Republican

party federal committees on the

state and local levels raised $108.8

million between January 1 and

December 31, and spent $99.7

million. The committees reported

cash on hand at $10.8 million and

debts totaling $13.3 million. The

Democratic national committees—

consisting of the Democratic

National Committee, Democratic

Senatorial Campaign Committee

and Democratic Congressional

Campaign Committee—and Democratic party federal committees on

the state and local levels raised

$64.5 million and reported spending

$62.8 million during 1997. The

committees reported cash on hand at

the end of the year at $4.4 million

and debts reaching $17.3 million.

The receipts for both parties

declined from the same period in

1995—a Presidential election

cycle—but, when compared to

1993, the last Nonpresidential

election cycle, the Republicans

increased their receipts by 14

percent while the Democrats

increased their receipts by 26

percent.

Soft Money Increases a Record

for Both Parties

The Republican national committees raised $40.2 million for their

soft money accounts, a 22 percent

increase over 1995. The Democratic

national committees raised $33.9

million in soft money, representing

a 19 percent increase over 1995.

Soft money refers to funds that are

raised outside the limitations and

prohibitions of the Federal Election

Campaign Act. Such funds cannot

be used to pay for expenditures

related to federal elections, but may

be used to pay for nonfederal

election activity. The FEC began

requiring that national party committees disclose information about

their soft money accounts in January

1991.

Information about the Democratic

and Republican party committees’

Year-End reports is included in a

March 19 new release. The release,

which includes statistical information dating back to the 1990 election

cycle, is available:

• At the FEC’s web site at http://

www.fec.gov (click on “News

Releases and Media Advisories” at

the main menu);

• From the Public Records Office

(call 800/424-9530 and press 3);

and

• By fax (call FEC Faxline at 202/

501-3413 and request document

609).

The charts on pages 4 and 5 are

based on data taken from this news

release. To view digital images of

the party committees’ reports

submitted to the Commission, visit

the FEC’s web site at the address

listed above and click on “View

Financial Reports Filed by Presidential and House Campaigns, Parties,

and PACs.” ✦

1989 1991 1993 1995 1997

Receipts $33.0 $96.0 $37.0 $95.8 $51.1 $95.7 $68.7 $127.4 $64.5 $108.8

Disbursements $34.5 $88.1 $37.0 $87.4 $49.5 $83.9 $63.2 $112.1 $62.8 $99.7

Cash on

Hand $6.6 $16.9 $3.8 $7.2 $5.1 $12.6 $5.6 $16.6 $4.4 $10.8

Debts $5.0 $2.5 $3.4 $4.7 $3.2 $7.5 $7.9 $3.2 $17.3 $13.3

Party Committees’ Federal Activity During Nonelection Years

Democratic totals are shown without shading; Republican totals are shown in blue areas. All totals are in millions.
May 1998 Federal Election Commission RECORD

5

Contributors to National Party Committees in 1997

 $0

 $10

 $20

 $30

 $40

 $50

Republicans

Democrats

1991 1993 1995 1997

Millions

Soft Money Contributions to National Party

Committees, 1991-1997

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

Soft Money

Hard Money

Democrats Republicans

Millions

Hard Money and Soft

Money Collected by

Party Committees

During 1997

Individuals/Up to $200

State and Local Committees*

National Committees*

PACs/Other Committees

Individuals/More than $200

* Denotes transfers of funds from these committees to national party committees.

Democrats Republicans
Federal Election Commission RECORD May 1998

6

FEC Faxline Menu

FEC Faxline documents may be

ordered 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,

by calling 202/501-3413 on a touch

tone phone. You will be asked for the

numbers of the documents you want,

your fax number and your telephone

number. The documents will be faxed

shortly thereafter.

Federal Election Commission

411. Complete Menu of All Material

Available

501. The FEC and the Federal

Campaign Finance Law

502. La Ley Federal relativa al

Financiamiento de las Campañas

503. Federal and State Campaign

Finance Laws

504. Compliance with Laws Outside

the FEC’s Jurisdiction

505. Biographies of Commissioners

and Officers

506. Telephone Directory

507. Table of Organization

508. Index for 1996 Record

Newsletter

509. Free Publications

510. Personnel Vacancy

Announcements

511. Freedom of Information Act

Requesters’ Guide

512. Legal Opportunities at the FEC

Disclosure

521. Guide to Researching Public

Records

522. Accessibility of Public Records

Office

523. Federal/State Records Offices

524. Using FEC Campaign Finance

Information

525. State Computer Access to FEC

Data

526. Direct Access Program (DAP)

527. Sale and Use of Campaign

Information

528. Combined Federal/State

Disclosure Directory 1997 on

Disk

529. Selected Political Party Organizations and Addresses

530. Internet Access to the FEC

531. Downloadable Databases via the

Internet

532. Electronic Filing Took Kit

533. State Campaign Finance and

Lobbying Data on the Internet

Limitations

546. Contributions

547. Coordinated Party Expenditure

Limits

548. Advances: Contribution Limits

and Reporting

549. Volunteer Activity

550. Independent Expenditures

551. Local Party Activity

552. Corporate Communications/

Facilities

553. Trade Associations

554. Foreign Nationals

555. The $25,000 Annual Contribution Limit

556. Personal Use of Campaign

Funds

557. Delegate Activity

558. Partnerships

Public Funding

566. Public Funding of Presidential

Elections

567. The $3 Tax Checkoff

568. 1993 Changes to Checkoff

569. Recipients of Public Funding

570. Presidential Fund Income Tax

Checkoff Status

571. Presidential Spending Limits

Compliance

581. Candidate Registration

582. Committee Treasurers

583. Special Notices on Political Ads

and Solicitations

584. 10 Questions from Candidates

585. Filing a Complaint

586. 1998 Reporting Dates

587. 1998 Congressional Primary

Dates

588. 1998 Special Election Reporting

Dates

589. 1998 FEC Regional Conference

Schedule

Money in Politics Statistics

601. 1991-2 Political Money

602. 1997 Mid-Year PAC Count

603. 1993-4 Congressional

604. 1993-4 National Party

605. 1993-4 PAC Finances

606. 1995-6 Congressional

607. 1995-6 National Party

608. 1995-6 PAC Finances

609. 1997-8 National Party

610. 1997-8 Congressional

1996 Presidential

651. 1996 Presidential Primary Dates

652. Selected 1996 Campaign Names

and Addresses

653. Selected 1996 Campaign

Finance Figures

654. 1996 Public Funding Certifications and Payments

655. 1996 Presidential General

Election Ballots

656. 1996 Presidential General

Election Results

Office of Election Administration

701. List of Reports Available

702. Voting Accessibility for the

Elderly and Handicapped Act

703. National Voter Registration Act

Regulations

704. National Voter Registration Act

of 1993

705. The Electoral College

706. Organizational Structure of the

American Election System

707. Primary Functions of an

Electoral System

Forms

801. Form 1, Statement of Organization

802. Form 2, Statement of Candidacy

803. Form 3 and 3Z, Report for an

Authorized Committee

804. Form 3X, Report for Other Than

an Authorized Committee

805. Form 5, Report of Independent

Expenditures

806. Form 6, 48-Hour Notice of

Contributions/Loans Received

807. Form 7, Report of Communication Costs

808. Form 8, Debt Settlement Plan

809. Form 1M, Notification of

Multicandidate Status

Schedules

825. Schedule A, Itemized Receipts

826. Schedule B, Itemized Disbursements

827. Schedules C and C-1, Loans

828. Schedule D, Debts and Obligations

829. Schedule E, Itemized Independent Expenditures

830. Schedule F, Itemized Coordinated Expenditures

831. Schedules H1 –H4, Allocation

832. Schedule I, Aggregate Page

Nonfederal Accounts

Information
May 1998 Federal Election Commission RECORD

7

Regulations (11 CFR Parts 100-201)

100. Part 100, Scope and Definitions

1007. Part 100.7, Contribution

1008. Part 100.8, Expenditure

101. Part 101, Candidate Status and

Designations

102. Part 102, Registration, Organization and Recordkeeping by

Political Committees

1021. Part 102.17, Joint Fundraising

by Committees Other Than SSFs

103. Part 103, Campaign Depositories

104. Part 104, Reports by Political

Committees

1047. Part 104.7, Best Efforts

105. Part 105, Document Filing

106. Part 106, Allocations of Candidate and Committee Activities

107. Part 107, Presidential Nominating Convention, Registration and

Reports

108. Part 108, Filing Copies of

Reports and Statements with

State Offices

109. Part 109, Independent Expenditures

110. Part 110, Contribution and

Expenditure Limitations and

Prohibitions

1101. Part 110.1, Contributions by

Persons Other Than Multicandidate Political Committees

1102. Part 110.2, Contributions by

Multicandidate Committees

1103. Part 110.3, Contribution

Limitations for Affiliated

Committees and Political Party

Committees; Transfers

1104. Part 110.4, Prohibited Contributions

1105. Part 110.5, Annual Contribution

Limitation for Individuals

1106. Part 110.6, Earmarked Contributions

1107. Part 110.7, Party Committee

Expenditure Limitations

1108. Part 110.8, Presidential Candidate Expenditure Limitations

1109. Part 110.9, Miscellaneous

Provisions

1110. Part 110.10, Expenditures by

Candidates

1111. Part 110.11, Communications;

Advertising

1112. Part 110.12, Candidate Appearances on Public Educational

Institution Premises

1113. Part 110.13, Nonpartisan

Candidate Debates

1114. Part 110.14, Contributions to

and Expenditures by Delegates

and Delegate Committees

111. Part 111, Compliance Procedure

112. Part 112, Advisory Opinions

113. Part 113, Excess Campaign

Funds and Funds Donated to

Support Federal Officeholder

Activities

114. Part 114, Corporate and Labor

Organization Activity

115. Part 115, Federal Contractors

116. Part 116, Debts Owed by

Candidates and Political

Committees

200. Part 200, Petitions for Rulemaking

201. Part 201, Ex Parte Communications

Recent Actions on Regulations,

Including Explanations

and Justifications

227. Electronic Filing of Reports by

Political Committees

228. Coordinated and Independent

Expenditures by Party Committees

229. Definition of “Member” of a

Membership Association

230. Petitions for Rulemaking: Soft

Money

231. Recordkeeping and Reporting

232. Express Advocacy

233. Qualified Nonprofit Corporations

U.S. Code (Title 2)

431. Section 431 442. Section 442

432. Section 432 451. Section 451

433. Section 433 452. Section 452

434. Section 434 453. Section 453

437. Section 437 454. Section 454

4377. Section 437g 455. Section 455

438. Section 438

439. Section 439

441. Section 441

4411. Section 441a

4412. Section 441b

4413. Section 441c

4414. Section 441d

4415. Section 441e

4416. Section 441f

Advisory Opinions

9701-23. AOs 1997-1 through 1997-23

9601-52. AOs 1996-1 through 1996-52

9501-49. AOs 1995-1 through 1995-49

9401-40. AOs 1994-1 through 1994-40

9301-25. AOs 1993-1 through 1993-25

9201-44. AOs 1992-1 through 1992-44

9101-40. AOs 1991-1 through 1991-40

9001-40. AOs 1990-1 through 1990-40

Index

The first number in each citation

refers to the “number” (month) of

the 1998 Record issue in which the

article appeared. The second

number, following the colon,

indicates the page number in that

issue. For example, “1:4” means

that the article is in the January

issue on page 4.

Advisory Opinions

1997-18: Status of committee as

local party committee, 1:14

1997-22: Communicating membership corporation’s endorsements

of federal candidates to members

and their restricted classes, 1:14

1997-25: Affiliation of corporate

SSFs after reorganization, 3:5

1997-26: Establishment of

nonconnected PAC by individuals

affiliated with trade association,

3:7

1997-27: Use of campaign funds to

pay legal expenses, 4:7

1997-28: Reinstatement of terminated candidate committee to

retire debt to candidate, 4:8

1997-29: Status as state committee

of political party, 4:8

1998-1: Use of campaign funds to

pay legal expenses, 4:8

1998-2: Status as national committee of political party; status of

affiliated state parties as state

committees of political party, 4:10

1998-3: Status as state committee of

political party, 4:11

Court Cases

FEC v. _____

– Al Salvi for Senate Committee,

4:4

– Charles Woods for U.S. Senate,

3:3

– National Medical Political Action

Committee, 1:3

– Williams, 1:3

_____ v. FEC

– Clifton, 4:5

– Hollenbeck, 4:4

(continued on page 8)
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20463

Official Business

Penalty for Private Use, $300

Bulk Rate Mail

Postage and Fees Paid

Federal Election Commission

Permit Number G-31

Printed on recycled paper

Federal Election Commission RECORD May 1998

– Judicial Watch, Inc., 4:4

– National Committee of the Reform

Party, 1:2; 4:4

– Stockman, 5:3

Reports

Electronic filing, 4:1; 4:2

On FEC web site, 2:1; 4:2

Pre-Election Reporting Dates: 1998

Primary and Runoff Elections, 1:8

Reports, Alabama Runoff, 2:1

Reports due in 1998, 1:6; 1:11

Reports due in April, 4:2

Special Elections, California, 1:12;

3:9

Special Election, New Mexico, 5:3

Special Election, New York, 2:4

Special Election, Pennsylvania, 1:13

Surveying potential for electronic

filing, 2:2

Index

(continued from page 7) Index to PAC Abbreviations, Other PAC Publications Available

 The Commission has published its latest edition of Pacronyms, an

alphabetical compilation of acronyms, abbreviations and common names of

political action committees (PACs).

 For each PAC listed, the index provides the full name of the PAC, its city,

state, FEC identification number and, if not identifiable from the full name, its

connected, sponsoring or affiliated organization.

 The index is helpful in identifying PACs that are not readily identified in

their reports and statements on file with the FEC.

 To order a free copy of Pacronyms, call the Office of Public Records at 800/

424-9530 (press 3) or 202/219-4140. Pacronyms also is available on diskette

for $1 and can be accessed free on the FEC’s web site—http://www.fec.gov.

 Other PAC indexes, described below, may be ordered from the Office of

Public Records. Prepayment is required.

• An alphabetical list of all registered PACs shows each PAC’s identification

 number, address, treasurer and connected organization ($13.25).

• A list of registered PACs arranged by state provides the same information as

 above ($13.25).

• An alphabetical list of organizations sponsoring PACs shows the PAC’s

 name and identification number ($7.50).