alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CHARLES H. KATT and Others, Appellants, *v.*THE GERMANIA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

*Referee*— The *failure of a referee to be sworn wiU not authorize the setting aside of' the*judgment— *Code of Uiml Procedure, sec.*731.

The failure of a referee to be sworn will not authorize the court to set aside the-judgment entered upon his report.

Appeals from orders made at Special Term, setting aside a judgment entered upon the report of a referee and setting aside: the report.

*A. Blmnenstiel,*for the appellants.

*John Chetwood,*for the respondent.

*430Davis, P. J.;

The first appeal is from an order of Special Term setting aside the judgment, entered upon the report of a referee. The seconu is from the order of another Special Term setting aside the report of the referee.

Both of these orders were based upon the fact that the oath of the referee was taken before one of the attorneys for the plaintiff in the action. If the taking of an oath before the attorney is void, the worst effect that could follow is that no oath was taken by the referee.

Section 121 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares that where a verdict, report or decision has been rendered, judgment shall not be stayed, nor shall any judgment of a court of record be impaired or affected by reason of either of the following imperfections, omissions, defects, matters or things in the process, pleadings or other proceedings * * *. “Por an omission on the part of a referee to be sworn.”

This section we think clearly disposes of both motions contrary to the decision of the court below. \

The judgment, ought not to be disturbed, but having been set aside for an alleged defect, the order to set aside the report ^as regarded by the learned judge holding the subsequent Special Terffi as a necessary consequence of the first order. He was correctN under the assumption that the order setting aside the judgment was regular ; but its palpable irregularity compels us to reverse it, and it follows, as a matter of course, that the second order must be reversed.

Both of these order's must be reversed, with the costs in one • appeal and the disbursements in both.

Present — Davis, P. J., Beady and Daniels, J.J.

Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs in one appeal and disbursements in both.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.400 General requirements for gauges. ( a ) Columnar gauge glasses must not be installed on a cargo containment system.
( b ) Flat sight glasses must meet § 38.10-20(h) of this chapter.
# CE2009295EN.01016502.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 295/165 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 295/165

---

Wednesday 3 September 2008Type-approval of hydrogen powered motor vehicles ***I

P6_TA(2008)0395

European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 September 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of hydrogen powered motor vehicles and amending Directive 2007/46/EC (COM(2007)0593 — C6-0342/2007 — 2007/0214(COD))

2009/C 295 E/43

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0593),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0342/2007),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0201/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Wednesday 3 September 2008P6_TC1-COD(2007)0214

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading of 3 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of hydrogen-powered motor vehicles, and amending Directive 2007/46/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 79/2009.)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,005
<INVENTORY>                                      3,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,287
<PP&E>                                         130,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           176
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,764
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,840
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,878
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                       463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    134
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       528
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

January 5, 2024 SC-2023-0892 Ex parte Curtis Lee Johnson. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Curtis Lee Johnson v. State of Alabama) (Cherokee Circuit Court: CC-20-900036; Criminal Appeals: CR-21-0291).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on January 5, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Shaw, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Bryan, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION
MEMORANDUM Date: February 10 ,2 0 1 5 Subject: Sethoxydim. Tolerance Vocabulary Revision made for the Section 3 Registration of the Herb i cide Sethoxydim on Grass Grown for Seed. U pdate to Summary of A nalytical Chemistry and Residue Data. PC Code: 121001 DP Barcode: D4250 18 Decision No.: 487076 Registration No.: 7969 -56 & 7969-58 Petition No.: 4E8239 Regulatory Action: Section 3 R egistration Risk Assessment Type: NA Case No.: 2600 TXRNo.: NA CAS No.: 74051-80-2 MRID Nos.: 49257702 40 CFR : § 180.412
F ROM:

T HROUGH:

TO: Peter Savoia, Chemist Risk Assessment Branch (RAB) V Health Effects Division (7509P) William H. Donovan , Ph.D. ,

# Che**mi ~~-klf(;~~**  MichaelS. Metzger , Branch Chief )(

- RAB VNII
. Health Effects Division (7509P) S idney Jackson/Barbara Madden, 

### RM 05 Minor Use and Emergency Re spo n se Branch Registration Division (7505P) And Ronni e J. Bever , Risk Assessor Risk Assessment Branch (RAB) VII Health Effec ts Division (7509P) A residue chemistry s ummary memo for the new use request of set h oxydim inion a variety of crops was recently comp leted (0422744 , P. Savoia, 12 / 18/ 2014). In the process of preparing the risk assessment for thi s action, the need for an update to the residue chemistry summary memo was identified. Accordingly , the following section replaces the corresponding section ofthe December 18 , 2014 memorandum.

Page 1 of2Sethoxydim Summary of Analytical C hemistry and Residue Data 0 425018 

### 2.0 Regulatory Recommendations Pending submission of a r ev i sed Section F and a revised Section B as indi cated 

### in the prior detailed review, there are no residue chemistry co n s id erations that would preclude es tabli shment of the recommended to leran ces on the following g rass c rops: Fescue , forage
................................................... .. .. .. ......... 7 ppm Fescu e , ha· y ...... .. .. .. .. . ... . .. . ................................................. 4 ppm

Page 2 of2
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.1010 Alkylene oxides. ( a ) Before each loading of a cargo containment system with a cargo referenced to this section in Table 1, the person in charge of cargo transfer shall: ( 1 ) Unless the tankship is equipped with independent cargo piping that meets paragraph (d) of this section: ( i ) Obtain verification from a Coast Guard Marine Inspector or from a representative of the tankship's flag administration that separation of the alkylene oxide piping system complies with alkylene oxide handling plans approved by the Coast Guard or the tankship's flag administration; and
( ii ) Make sure that each spectacle flange and blank flange connection that is required to separate alkylene oxide piping systems from other systems has a wire and seal attached by a Coast Guard Marine Inspector or a representative of the tankship's flag administration.
( 2 ) Purge the containment system until the oxygen content of the cargo tank is less than 2% by volume.
( b ) The person in charge of an alkylene oxide cargo transfer shall ensure that: ( 1 ) No alkylene oxide vapor or liquid is released to the atmosphere during cargo transfer;
( 2 ) No vapor return system connected to an alkylene oxide containment system is at the same time connected to another containment system;
( 3 ) Alkylene oxide is discharged only by an intank cargo pump or inert gas displacement;
( 4 ) Transfer hose is approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG) under § 153.530(o) for alkylene oxide transfer and is marked “For Alkylene Oxide Transfer Only”; and
( 5 ) A water hose is laid out on deck with water pressure to the nozzle, and all alkylene oxide spillages are washed away immediately.
( c ) While alkylene oxides are onboard the vessel, the master shall make sure that the oxygen content of the vapor space above the alkylene oxide and those spaces specified in § 153.530 (k) and (l) is maintained below 2% by volume.
( d ) Tankships with independent piping for alkylene oxides must have onboard: ( 1 ) Alkylene oxide handling plans approved by the Coast Guard or the tankship's flag administration; and
( 2 ) Certification from the Coast Guard or the tankship's flag administration that the cargo piping for alkylene oxides is independent.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21211, May 17, 1982; CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael MacMillan, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|October 27, 2004.
|-----------------
|                 

40-F118

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         129,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,068
<PP&E>                                          53,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,496
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,197,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,709
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,774,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,770,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,770,791)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

h0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146076(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146076

COA: 311574

Oakland CC: 1982-055278-FY

MARTY B. MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 29, 

2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of San West, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, Frank J. Drechsler, Chief Financial Officer of San West, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of San West, Inc.

Dated: August 16, 2010

/s/ Frank J. Drechsler

Frank J. Drechsler, Chief Financial Officer of    San West, Inc.
July 20, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDDY GARCIA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 16

- 00242

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________ _________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record reveals error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We furthe r order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

*Name:*                     Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee.                

*Time and Date:*                     May 2—9 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                

*Place:*                     Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.—Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.                

*Purpose:*                     The meeting agenda will include receiving from the Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the interested public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the meeting or obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 267-8937 or                     *gloria.dunderman@faa.gov*. Attendees will have to present picture ID at the security desk and escorted to the Round Room.                

Members of the public may present a written statement to the Committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4, 2007.

Barry Scott,

Acting Director, Research and Development Office.

[FR Doc. 07-1745  Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael D. Kishbauch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2010 |  | /s Michael D. Kishbauch              
|                    |  | Michael D. Kishbauch                 
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 119.600 General.

A self-propelled vessel must meet the applicable requirements for main and auxiliary steering apparatus in subchapters F (Marine Engineering) and J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.