alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.01

IDT CORPORATION

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated October 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of IDT
Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of IDT Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 31, 2007, in each of the following:



| | 1. | Registration Statement No. 333-53719 on Form S-3;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement No. 333-61565 on Form S-3;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement No. 333-71991 on Form S-3;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement No. 333-73167 on Form S-8;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Registration Statement No. 333-77395 on Form S-3;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | Registration Statement No. 333-80133 on Form S-3;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 7. | Registration Statement No. 333-86261 on Form S-3;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------



| | 8. | Registration Statement No. 333-100424 on Form S-8;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------



| | 9. | Registration Statement No. 333-104286 on Form S-3;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------



| | 10. | Registration Statement No. 333-105865 on Form S-8;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------



| | 11. | Registration Statement No. 333-115403 on Form S-3;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------



| | 12. | Registration Statement No. 333-116266 on Form S-8; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | 13. | Registration Statement No. 333-119190 on Form S-3.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|Metropark, New Jersey
|October 12, 2007
§ 12.103 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the Coast Guard, Office of Merchant Mariner Credentialing (CG-MMC), U.S. Coast Guard, Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO), 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, England: ( 1 ) The Seafarers' Training, Certification and Watchkeeping Code, as amended, 2011 (the STCW Code), incorporation by reference approved for §§ 12.601, 12.602, 12.603, 12.605, 12.607, 12.609, 12.611, 12.613, 12.615, 12.617, 12.619, 12.621, 12.623, 12.811, and 12.905.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77975, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2016-0315, 81 FR 43955, July 6, 2016]
From:                              Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Sent:                               Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:48 PM

To:                                   undisclosed‐recipients

Subject:                          Clarifications on Testing 114 Request

 

A question arose about the "Other Information" column for Speciated Volatile organic HAP 

testing and the addition of the 4 m^3 per test requirement. This is an error, please strike that 

requirement. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks 

Table 1.3. Summary of Test Methods and Alternative Methods for Organic HAP from Thermal 

Chip Dryers and Scrap Dryers/Delacquering Kilns/ Decoating Kilns at Secondary Aluminum 

Production Facilities 

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 

Mail Drop D243-02 

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207 

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

Pollutant Recommended Method Alternative Method Other 

Information

Target 

Reported Units 

of Measurea

Speciated 

Volatile 

organic HAPb

SW-846 Method 0031 with SW-846 

Method 8620B, collect a minimum of 

four sets of adsorbent traps over a 2 

hour period per test run.c

 

U.S. EPA Method 320, sample 

at least 1 hour per test runc

, 

target an in-stack concentration 

detection level of < 25 ppbv. 

Three test runs; 

minimum 4 m^3 

per test 

kg/hr and 

 kg/Mg of 

feed/charge

Page 1 of 1

mhtml:file://\\rtifile02.rcc_nt.rti.org\ehe\Projects\0210426-EPA_SPPD_(Opt4)\0210426.00... 1/10/2012
§ 11.1005 Employer application requirements. ( a ) The employer must submit the following to the Coast Guard, as a part of the applicant's application for a “Certificate attesting recognition,” on behalf of the applicant: ( 1 ) A signed report that contains all material disciplinary actions related to the applicant, such as, but not limited to, violence or assault, theft, drug and alcohol policy violations, and sexual harassment, along with an explanation of the criteria used by the employer to determine the materiality of those actions.
( 2 ) A signed report regarding an employer-conducted background check. The report must contain— ( i ) A statement that the applicant has successfully undergone an employer-conducted background check;
( ii ) A description of the employer-conducted background check; and
( iii ) All information derived from the employer-conducted background check.
( b ) If a “Certificate attesting recognition” is issued to the applicant, the employer must maintain a detailed record of the seaman's total service on all authorized U.S. flag vessels, and must make that information available to the Coast Guard upon request.
( c ) In addition to the initial material disciplinary actions report and the initial employer-conducted background check specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the employer must submit an annual material disciplinary actions report to update whether there have been any material disciplinary actions related to the applicant since the last material disciplinary actions report was submitted to the Coast Guard.
( d ) The employer must also submit to the Coast Guard the applicant's copy of the following: ( 1 ) Base credential (certificate of competency), as well as any other documentary evidence of proficiency (such as Basic Training in accordance with § 11.302 of this part, Basic/Advanced Firefighting in accordance with § 11.303 of this part, Survival Craft, etc.) to verify that the applicant meets the manning requirements. The documentation must include any necessary official translation into the English language.
( 2 ) Valid medical certificate.
( 3 ) Valid identification document, such as a passport or Seaman's Identity Document (SID).
( e ) The employer is subject to the civil penalty provisions specified in 46 U.S.C. 8103(f) for any violation of this section.
§ 95.509 Cost allocation plan amendments and certifications. ( a ) The State shall promptly amend the cost allocation plan and submit the amended plan to the Director, DCA if any of the following events occur: ( 1 ) The procedures shown in the existing cost allocation plan become outdated because of organizational changes, changes in Federal law or regulations, or significant changes in program levels, affecting the validity of the approved cost allocation procedures.
( 2 ) A material defect is discovered in the cost allocation plan by the Director, DCA or the State.
( 3 ) The State plan for public assistance programs is amended so as to affect the allocation of costs.
( 4 ) Other changes occur which make the allocation basis or procedures in the approval cost allocation plan invalid.
( b ) If a State has not submitted a plan or plan amendment during a given State fiscal year, an annual statement shall be submitted to the Director, DCA certifying that its approved cost allocation plan is not outdated. This statement shall be submitted within 60 days after the end of that fiscal year.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1051

MICHEL RIDGELY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ELAINE CHAO, Secretary, U.S. Department of

Labor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-00343-GBL-TC)

Submitted: October 29, 2007 Decided: December 6, 2007

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Stephen Domenic Scavuzzo, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck

Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Lauren A. Wetzler, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michel Ridgely appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant summary judgment on Ridgely’s employment

discrimination and retaliation claims. Ridgely first challenges

the transfer of his civil action from the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia to the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. However, we do not

have jurisdiction to review this issue because Ridgely failed to

challenge the change of venue in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Brock v. Entre Computer Ctrs., Inc., 933 F.2d 1253, 1257 (4th Cir.

1991). Accordingly, we dismiss Ridgely’s appeal as to that issue.

Ridgely next contends the district court improperly

concluded that he failed to exhaust his retaliation claim. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ridgely v.

Chao, No. 1:06-cv-00343-GBL-TC (E.D. Va., Dec. 29, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JOE SOLO AND BLEACHTECH 

L.L.C. on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 14-12719 

Hon. Denise Page Hood 

Mag. R. Steven Whalen 

Class Action 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Sonal Hope Mithani of the law firm of 

Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. has this day entered an appearance as 

attorney for Defendant United Parcel Service Co. (“UPS”), in the above-referenced 

action. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/Sonal Hope Mithani 

Sonal Hope Mithani (P51984) 

MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK 

 and STONE, P.L.C. 

101 N. Main Street, 7th Floor 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(734) 668-7786 

mithani@millercanfield.com 

Attorney for Defendant 

Dated: August 26, 2019 United Parcel Service Co. 

Case 2:14-cv-12719-DPH-RSW ECF No. 128 filed 08/26/19 PageID.2702 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 26, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing 

papers with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to all ECF filers of record. 

By: /s/ Sonal H. Mithani 

Sonal Hope Mithani (P51984) 

MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK 

 and STONE, P.L.C. 

101 N. Main St., 7th Floor 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(734) 668-7786 

mithani@millercanfield.com

Case 2:14-cv-12719-DPH-RSW ECF No. 128 filed 08/26/19 PageID.2703 Page 2 of 2
§ 105.15 Cargo transfer operations. During a transfer operation involving bulk liquid flammable or combustible cargoes— ( a ) The operation must comply with any conditions listed in the vessel's certificate of compliance;
( b ) The person in charge of the operation must ensure that— ( 1 ) Any galley fire is safely maintained during the operation or immediately extinguished if it cannot be so maintained; and
( 2 ) No smoking takes place in the vicinity of the operation.
( c ) A red flag by day or a red electric lantern at night, visible on all sides, must be used to signal a dockside transfer operation. For non-dockside transfer operations, a red flag must be used to signal the operation; and
( d ) During a dockside transfer operation, a placard must be displayed to warn persons approaching the gangway. The placard must use letters at least 2 inches high, bear the heading “Warning,” and prohibit open lights, smoking, or visitors.
( e ) The vessel, personnel, and operation are subject to all applicable pollution prevention requirements set forth in 33 CFR parts 155 and 156.
§ 115.910 Passenger Ship Safety Certificate. ( a ) A vessel that carries more than 12 passengers on an international voyage must have a valid SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate. The Commandant authorizes the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) to issue the original SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate after receiving notification from the cognizant OCMI that the vessel complies with the applicable SOLAS regulations. Subsequent SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificates are issued by the cognizant OCMI unless any changes to the vessel or its operations have occurred that changes the information on the certificate, in which case the Commandant will authorize the cognizant OCMI to reissue the certificate.
( b ) The route specified on the Certificate of Inspection and the SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate must agree.
( c ) A SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate is issued for a period of not more than 12 months.
( d ) The SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate may be withdrawn, revoked, or suspended at any time when the vessel is not in compliance with applicable SOLAS requirements.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 892, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78082, Dec. 14, 2010]
Case 5:14-cv-13402-JCO-MKM   ECF No. 1, PageID.1   Filed 09/03/14   Page 1 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-13402-JCO-MKM   ECF No. 1, PageID.2   Filed 09/03/14   Page 2 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-13402-JCO-MKM   ECF No. 1, PageID.3   Filed 09/03/14   Page 3 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-13402-JCO-MKM   ECF No. 1, PageID.4   Filed 09/03/14   Page 4 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-13402-JCO-MKM   ECF No. 1, PageID.5   Filed 09/03/14   Page 5 of 5
#### § 77.1 Purpose.

Letters of credit with the United States Treasury, issued by the Department to States or other grantees and contractors, are a convenient means for disbursing Federal funds to recipients of grant awards or contracts (recipient organizations) under the programs of this and other Executive Departments. The sound and efficient operation of the letter-of-credit system is dependent in large part upon the honesty, good faith, and responsible financial management of recipient organizations that receive funds pursuant to letters of credit. This part sets forth conditions that may prompt the Department to seek remedial action against a recipient organization operating under a letter of credit and the procedures that will be used to reach a final decision regarding the taking of remedial actions against a recipient organization.
#### § 109.525 Cranes: Working loads.

The master or person in charge shall ensure that tables indicating the maximum safe working loads for the various working angles of the boom, where the boom is rated at varying capacities depending on the radius, and the maximum and minimum radius at which the boom may be safely used, are conspicuously posted near the controls and are visible to the operator when working the crane.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,982,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  236,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,850
<INVENTORY>                                     23,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,834,502
<PP&E>                                         820,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,635,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,566,124
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,089,838)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,635,301
<SALES>                                      1,024,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,024,667
<CGS>                                          720,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,868,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,406,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,407,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,407,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 111 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. WELCH, Mr. MERKLEY, and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Government of Israel is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles 

6 and services described in Transmittal No. 24–10, 

7 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) 

8 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

9 2776(b)(1)), and published in the Congressional 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 111 IS 

1 Record on September 10, 2024: Thirty-two thousand 

2 seven hundred thirty-nine (32,739) 120mm tank 

3 cartridges, consisting of 120mm M1147 High Explo4 sive Multi-Purpose with Tracer (HEMP–T) car5 tridges and/or 120mm M830A1 High Explosive 

6 Multi-Purpose Anti-Tank (MPAT) with Tracer car7 tridges. Also included are various 120mm tank mu8 nitions; 120mm munition canisters; transportation 

9 costs; publications and technical documentation; 

10 U.S. Government and contractor engineering, tech11 nical, and logistics support services; and other re12 lated elements of logistics and program support. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-
53371 of Data Processing Resources Corporation on Form S-3, Registration
Statement No. 333-61017 on Form S-4 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-07145,
333-20627, 333-20629, 333-30663 and 333-45257, all on Form S-8, of our report
dated September 25, 1998 (October 20, 1998 as to Note 4, paragraph 11),
appearing in Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Data
Processing Resources Corporation for the year ended July 31, 1998.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
November 24, 1998
§ 900.108 Public involvement. ( a ) When public involvement is required pursuant to subparts C and D of this part, interested persons and the affected public shall be provided notice of the availability of environmental documents, NEPA-related hearings, and public meetings. Such notice will be made on the Commission Web site and other means such that the community is notified (e.g., community postings, newspaper, radio or television).
( b ) Applicants shall assist the Commission in providing the opportunity for public participation and considering the public comments on the proposal as described in subparts C and D of this part.
( c ) Interested persons can obtain information or status reports on EISs and other elements of the NEPA process from the Commission's office at 510 L Street, Suite 410; Anchorage, Alaska 99501; or on the Commission Web site at *http://www.denali.gov .* Telephone: (907) 271-1414. The Commission will provide hard copies of NEPA documents to governmental and/or tribal entities in the affected communities.
( d ) In the interests of national security or the public health, safety, or welfare, the Commission may reduce any time periods that the Commission has established and that are not required by the CEQ Regulations. The Commission shall publish a notice on the Web site at *http://www.denali.gov* and notify interested parties (see 40 CFR 1506.6) specifying the revised time periods for the proposed action and the rationale for the reduction.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

     SUBSIDIARY                              STATE/COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
     ----------                              ------------------------------

(1)  Bacou USA Safety, Inc.                  Delaware
(2)  Uvex Safety Manufacturing, Inc.         Delaware
(3)  Titmus Optical, Inc.                    Delaware
(4)  Perfect Fit Glove Co., LLC              Delaware
(5)  SCHAS Industries, LLC                   Delaware
(6)  Whiting & Davis, Inc.                   Delaware
(7)  Platinum Protective Products, Inc.      North Carolina
(8)  Bacou USA Finance, Inc.                 Minnesota
(9)  Bacou Foreign Sales Corporation         U.S. Virgin Islands
(10) Howard Leight de Mexico S.A. Do C.V.    Tijuana, Baja California
(11) Howard Leight (Europe), Ltd.            London, England