T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GA R Y L OU I S C OR B R AY , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. K. CUNN I NG HA M , C. O. , 3 d Sh i f tTU n it; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 35867 D. C. No . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 0 1 1 7 - J LQ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on J us t i n L . Q ua c ke nbus h, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T R O T T , a n dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . W a s hi ngt on s t a t e pr i s one rG a ryL oui s C orbr a yappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng va r i ous c ons t i tut i ona l c l a i m s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de 

# FI LED NO V 20 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 35867 2 n o v o ad is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) o r1 9 1 5 A . Sea to n v. M a yb erg , 6 1 0 F .3 d 5 3 0 , 5 3 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ; R es ni ck v. H ayes , 21 3 F . 3d 44 3, 44 7 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) . W e m a ya f

f irm o n a n yg r o u n ds u p p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . John son v. Ri v e rs i de H

e a l th c a r e S

ys . , LP , 5 3 4 F. 3 d1 1 1 6 , 1 1 2 1 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e a f f i rm. D i sm i ss al of C orbray ’ s r et al i at i on cl ai m w as prop erbecause C orbrayfa i l ed to a lle g e th a t d e f

e n d an ts ’ a lle g e d lyr e ta lia to rya c tio n s f a ile dto s e rv e a n yv a lid p e n o lo g ic a l g o a ls . Se e R h o de s v . R o b in s o n , 408 F . 3d 559, 567- 68 ( 9th C i r . 2005) (di sc ussi ng el em ent s of r et al i at i on cl ai m i n p ri son con t ext ). D i sm i ssal o f C o rb ray’ s S i x th A m en d m en tcl ai m w as p ro p er b ecau se C orbr a yf

a i l e d t o a l l e ge a nyvi ol a t i on of hi s r i ghtt o as pe e dytr i a l , t o c onf r onta ny w itn e s s e s a g a in s t h im , o rto a s s is ta n c e o f c o u n s e l. See U . S. C ON ST . a m e nd. V I; P alm erv. V

aldez , 5 6 0 F .3 d 9 6 5 , 9 7 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( th e r e is g e n e r a llyn o r ig h t to coun se l i n ci vi l ac t i on s) . D i sm i ssal o f C o rb ray’ s F o u rth A m en d m en tcl ai m w as p ro p er b ecau se in m a te s h a v e n o r ig h t o f p r iv a c yin th e irc e lls . Se e Se aton , 610 F . 3d a t534. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dC o rb r a y ’s F if th a n dF o u rte e n th A m e ndm e ntdue pr oc e s s c l a i m s be c aus e a l l e ge dl ybe i ng ve rba l l yha r a s s e d, w r ongf ul l ya c c us e d of

i nf r a c t i ons , c onf

i ne d t o orm ove d f

r om hi s c e l l , a nd l os i ng h is p r is o n jo b a r e in s u f

f ic ie n t to im p lic a te ap r o te c te dlib e rtyo rp r o p e rtyin te r e s t.11- 35867 3 See San di n v. C on ner , 5 1 5 U .S . 4 7 2 , 4 8 3 - 8 4 ( 1 9 9 5 ) ( p r o te c te dlib e rtyo rp r o p e rty i nt er es ton l y ari se s und erD ue P roce ss C l ause w hen a res tra i nti m po se s an “ atypi ca l a nd s i gni f

i c a ntha r ds hi p on the i nm a t e i n r e l a t i on t o the or di na ryi nc i de nt s of p r is o n lif e ” ) ; W alke r v . G om ez , 370 F . 3d 969, 973 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( no pr ope rtyor lib e rtyin te r e s t in p r is o n e m p lo y m e n t) ; O l ta rzew skiv. R u g g i ero , 830 F . 2d 136, 139 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 7 ) ( d ir e c tin g v u lg a rla n g u a g e a t in m a te d o e s n o t g iv e r is e to c ons t i tut i ona l c l a i m ) . M or e ove r , the r a ndom a nd unauthor i z e d de pr i va t i on of C o rb r a y ’s p r o p e rtyd idn o t a m o u n t to ad u e p r o c e s s v io la tio n b e c au s e th e s ta te p r o v id e s a d e q u a te p o s t- d e p r iv a tio n r e m e d ie s . Se e B arne t t v . C e ntoni , 31 F . 3d 813, 81 6 (9th C i r. 19 94 ) ( per c uri am ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d C orbr a y ’ s c l a i m s a ga i ns ts upe rvi s or B e c e rr ab e c au s e C o rb r a yf a ile d to a lle g e th a t B e c e rr ap a rtic ip a te din o rf a ile dto p r e v e n t th e v io la tio n o f ac o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t b yh is s u b o r d in a te s . See T aylor v. L ist , 8 8 0 F .2 d 1 0 4 0 , 1 0 4 5 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 9 ) ( lis tin g e le m e n ts o f s u p e rv is o ryliab ility un der § 19 83 ). C orbray ’ s c on t ent i on thatthe di stri ctcourtfa i l ed t o l i bera l l y c on strue hi s pro s e pl e a di ngs i s nots upport e d bythe r e c or d. AF F I RME D.