alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2052 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2052

  To provide for special rules relating to assistance concerning the 
                      Greensburg, Kansas, tornado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2009

 Mr. Moran of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for special rules relating to assistance concerning the 
                      Greensburg, Kansas, tornado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Greensburg, Kansas, Recovery 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO ADDRESS GREENSBURG, KANSAS, TORNADO.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of any 
national emergency grant that was made under section 173 of the 
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2918) to address the 
effects of the May 4, 2007, Greensburg, Kansas, tornado, funds made 
available for such grant shall remain available for expenditure through 
June 30, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 131.915 Persons allowed in pilothouse and on navigational bridge.

No person may be in the pilothouse while the vessel is under way, unless connected with the navigation of the vessel or authorized for good cause by the master or mate on watch.
a. Basic Levee (above). 

b. Bank Levee (above).

Enclosure 3, Figure 1: Typical Levee Cross Sections. The purpose of these illustrations is to define terms. These 

illustrations do not include appurtenant structures and do not represent all possible levee configurations. Analysis 

such as detailed in Enclosure 3, Paragraph 5.b.2 (above in Enclosure 3) may or may not show the prism to be 

smaller than the existing levee cross section.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael D. Kishbauch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: October 27, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Kishbauch             
|                        |  |  |  | Michael D. Kishbauch                 
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2008265EN.01002601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/26 |

---

Information of Member States that intend to postpone the implementation of Directive 2008/6/EC until 31 December 2012, in order to continue to reserve services to universal service provider(s)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 265/08)

Article 3, paragraph 1 of Directive 2008/6/EC states that, by way of a derogation to Article 2, certain Member States, listed subsequently, may postpone the implementation of the said Directive until 31 December 2012, in order to continue to reserve services to universal service provider(s).

Article 3, paragraph 2 requires the relevant Member States to notify the Commission of their intention to make use of the derogation by 27 August 2008.

The following Member States have notified the Commission by 1 August 2008 of their intention to make use of the derogation set out in Article 3, paragraph 1 of Directive 2008/6/EC:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Czech Republic, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Greece, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Cyprus, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Latvia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Lithuania, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Luxembourg, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hungary, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Malta, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Poland, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Romania, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Slovakia. |

---
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.2 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.3 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.4 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.5 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.6 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.7 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:14-cr-20437-TLL ECF No. 1-1 filed 07/25/14 PageID.8 Page 7 of 7
# C_2011305EN.01000402.xml

| 15.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/4

---

Action brought on 25 July 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-391/11)

2011/C 305/05

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and A. Marghelis, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to transpose correctly the provisions of Article 2(1) and (3) and Article 5(1), (2) and (4) of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles (1), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to transpose correctly the provisions of Article 2(1) and (3) and Article 5(1), (2) and (4) of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles (1), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2000/53/EC expired on 21 April 2002. However, at the date on which the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, at least, had not informed the Commission of them.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 269, p. 34.

1

---
#### James B. Jermain, *Appellant, v.*The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, *Respondent.*William F. Drake and others, *Appellants, v.*The Same. Alexander Monroe, *Appellant, v.*The Same. *475Charles H. Raberg, Jr., *as Executor, etc.,*Appellant, *v.*The Same.

Judgments reversed, new trials ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

____________________________________ 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 12-0958 (ABJ) 

) 

CRAIG FOR U.S. SENATE, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

ORDER 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and for the reasons stated in the accompanying 

Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss [Dkt. #3] is DENIED. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties file a Local Rule 16.3 joint report by April 19, 

2013, and attend a status and scheduling conference on April 26, 2013 at 10 a.m. 

SO ORDERED. 

 

AMY BERMAN JACKSON 

United States District Judge 

DATE: March 28, 2013

Case 1:12-cv-00958-ABJ Document 10 Filed 03/28/13 Page 1 of 1
§ 121.115 Applicability to existing vessels. ( a ) An existing vessel need not comply with §§ 121.402(c), 121.404, 121.410, and 121.602 of this part unless the cognizant OCMI specifically requires compliance due to the route or service of the vessel.
( b ) An existing vessel need not comply with the requirements of § 121.610 of this part until March 11, 2001, or 10 years after its keel was laid or the vessel was at a similar stage of construction, whichever is later.
( c ) An existing vessel need not comply with the requirements of § 121.710 of this part until March 11, 1997.
#### Harrison S. Matteson, *Respondent, v.*Alvin H. Hall, *Appellant*.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
§ 130.120 Propulsion control. ( a ) Each vessel must have— ( 1 ) A propulsion-control system operable from the pilothouse; and
( 2 ) A means at each propulsion engine of readily disabling the propulsion-control system to permit local operation.
( b ) Each propulsion-control system operable from the pilothouse must enable— ( 1 ) Control of the speed of each propulsion engine;
( 2 ) Control of the direction of propeller-shaft rotation;
( 3 ) Control of propeller pitch, if a controllable-pitch propeller is fitted; and
( 4 ) Shutdown of each propulsion engine.
( c ) The propulsion-control system operable from the pilothouse may constitute the remote stopping-system required by § 129.540 of this subchapter.
( d ) Each propulsion-control system, including one operable from the pilothouse, must be designed so that no one complete or partial failure of an easily replaceable component of the system allows the propulsion engine to overspeed or the pitch of the propeller to increase.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2075 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2075

To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that, for purposes of 
any decennial census, any individual who is incarcerated as of the date 
on which such census is taken shall be attributed to the place that was 
      such individual's last usual place of residence before such 
                   individual's incarceration began.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2009

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that, for purposes of 
any decennial census, any individual who is incarcerated as of the date 
on which such census is taken shall be attributed to the place that was 
      such individual's last usual place of residence before such 
                   individual's incarceration began.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g)(1) In conducting any decennial census under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall, to the extent the Secretary considers it to be 
feasible and appropriate, attribute any individual who is incarcerated, 
as of the date on which such census is taken, to the place that was 
such individual's last usual place of residence before such 
individual's incarceration began.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `usual place of 
residence' has such meaning as the Secretary shall by regulation 
prescribe.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to any decennial census taken after the end of the 1-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 142.215 Approved equipment. ( a ) All portable fire extinguishers, semi-portable fire-extinguishing systems, and fixed fire-extinguishing systems required by this part must be approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG). Where other equipment in this part is required to be approved, such equipment requires the specific approval of the Commandant.
( b ) A listing of approved equipment and materials may be found online at *https://cgmix.uscg.mil/equipment*. Each cognizant OCMI may be contacted for information concerning approved equipment and materials.
( c ) New installations of fire-extinguishing and fire-detection equipment of a type not required, or in excess of that required by this part, may be permitted— ( 1 ) If Coast Guard approved;
( 2 ) If accepted by the local OCMI or TPO, as applicable; or
( 3 ) If equipment and components are listed and labeled by an independent Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL), as that term is defined in 29 CFR 1910.7, and are designed, installed, tested, and maintained in accordance with an appropriate industry standard and the manufacturer's specific guidance.
( d ) Existing equipment and installations, of a type not required, or in excess of that required by this part, not meeting the applicable requirements of this part may be continued in service so long as they are in good condition and accepted by the local OCMI or TPO.
[USCG-2006-24412, 81 FR 40101, June 20, 2016, as amended by USCG-2017-1060, 83 FR 8180, Feb. 26, 2018; USCG-2017-1060, 83 FR 53822, Oct. 25, 2018]
§ 131.945 Display of plans. Each vessel must have a permanently exhibited, for the guidance of the master and crew members, general arrangement plans showing, for each deck, the various fire-retardant bulkheads together with particulars of the— ( a ) Fire-detection systems;
( b ) Manual-alarm systems;
( c ) Fire-extinguishing systems;
( d ) Fire doors;
( e ) Means of ingress to the different compartments; and
( f ) Ventilating-systems, including the— ( 1 ) Positions of the dampers;
( 2 ) Site of the remote means of stopping the fans; and
( 3 ) Identification of the fans serving each section.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

EMILY SHAW, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:14-cv-14004 

 Hon. Thomas L Ludington 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Mag Hon. Patricia T. Morris 

a Georgia corporation, and 

CONSUMERS CREDIT UNION, 

a Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

CASE WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS AS TO DEFENDANT EQUIFAX 

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. 

The parties stipulate to the dismissal of this case with prejudice and without costs to 

either party as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. 

 

/s/ Gary Nitzkin ____ /s/ Jordan Bolton 

Gary D. Nitzkin (P41155) Jordan Bolton 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

Nitzkin & Associates Clark Hill PLC 

22142 West Nine Mile Road 500 Woodward Avenue Suite 3500 

Southfield, Michigan 48034 Detroit, MI 48226 

(248) 353-2882 (313) 965-8300 

gnitzkin@creditor-law.com jbolton@clarkhill.com 

Case 1:14-cv-14004-TLL-PTM ECF No. 9 filed 01/12/15 PageID.38 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

EMILY SHAW, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-14004 

v Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC 

a Georgia corporation, and 

CONSUMERS CREDIT UNION, 

a Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC 

ONLY 

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, 

 It is ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without cost 

to either party as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC only. 

 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: January 12, 2015 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on January 12, 2015. 

 s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

 TRACY A. JACOBS 

Case 1:14-cv-14004-TLL-PTM ECF No. 9 filed 01/12/15 PageID.39 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,168
<INVENTORY>                                     42,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,725
<PP&E>                                          74,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,715
<BONDS>                                        120,256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,425
<SALES>                                        272,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,797
<CGS>                                          145,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,190
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,190
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tasker Products Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Stathis Kouninis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
      the periods presented in the Report.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May
      15,
      2007






/s/
        Stathis Kouninis


Stathis
        Kouninis Chief
          Financial Officer (Principal
            Financial and Accounting Officer)
MONAKER GROUP, INC. - 10-K/A



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report
of Monaker Group, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2019, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Omar Jimenez, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended February 28, 2019, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2019, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
    June 13, 2019 | By: | /s/
Omar Jimenez                                           
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Omar Jimenez                                               
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer                                    
|                        |     | (Principal Accounting/Financial Officer)Monaker Group, Inc.
----

----

|   | (1) | This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of magicJack VocalTec Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of magicJack VocalTec Ltd. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of magicJack VocalTec Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of magicJack VocalTec Ltd. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----