alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
   Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-33141, Form S-4 No. 333-06443 (as amended)
   and Form S-8 No. 333-12807) pertaining to (a) Superior Services, Inc.'s
   registration of 5,000,000 shares of its common stock and common stock
   purchase rights (b) Superior Services, Inc.'s registration of 5,000,000
   shares of its common stock and common stock purchase rights and (c) the
   Superior Services, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, 1993 Incentive Stock
   Option Plan and various other individual Employment, Stock Option and
   Stock Purchase Agreements of our report dated February 5, 1998, with
   respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Superior
   Services, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
   ended December 31, 1997.


                                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

   Milwaukee, Wisconsin
   February 25, 1998
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-4-2003

Foster v. Natl Fuel Gas Supply

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket 02-1494

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Foster v. Natl Fuel Gas Supply" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 700.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/700
PRECEDENTIAL 

 Filed March 4, 2003 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 02-1494 

THERESA C. FOSTER 

v. 

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY, a corporation; 

SMITH INDUSTRIES INC., a corporation; 

COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, a 

corporation; AMERICAN METER COMPANY, a corporation; 

DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC., a corporation; ECLIPSE 

INC.; EQUIMETER, INC., a corporation 

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY, 

 Third Party Plaintiff 

v. 

SMITH INDUSTRIES, INC.; FREDERICK LOGAN 

COMPANY, INC.; AMERICAN METER COMPANY; 

EQUIMETER, INC., 

 Third Party Defendants 

EQUIMETER, INC., 

 Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Pennsylvania 

(D.C. Civil Action No. 96-cv-00014E) 

District Judge: Honorable Sean J. McLaughlin 

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) 

November 20, 2002 

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

AMBRO, Circuit Judge: 

It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above 

case filed January 21, 2003, be amended as follows: 

In the first sentence of the first paragraph, delete the 

words "each of ", which appear after "seeks to appeal" and 

before "the"; and delete the comma after the phrase "casein-chief ". 

 By the Court, 
 /s/Thomas L. AmbroCircuit Judge 

Dated: March 4, 2003 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SYNCORA GUARANTEE, INC. 

and SYNCORA CAPITAL ASSURANCE, INC.,

Appellants, Civil Action No. 14-CV-13044

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

vs.

CITY OF DETROIT,

Appellee.

___________________________________________/

ORDER STAYING APPEAL

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to stay this appeal pending confirmation of

the City of Detroit’s proposed plan of adjustment [docket entry 12]. For cause shown, it is

hereby,

ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion to stay the appeal is granted.

S/ Bernard A. Friedman__________

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 24, 2014

Detroit, Michigan

2:14-cv-13044-BAF-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 356
§ 9.5 Restrictions. ( a ) Each individual authorized to use Department facilities will be expected to use the facilities and equipment with customary care and otherwise conduct himself in such manner as to complete his research or study within any time limits prescribed.
( b ) Each individual authorized to use HHS facilities may not be authorized to sign requisitions for supplies and equipment.
( c ) Any official approving the use of HHS facilities should seek an agreement, executed by non-Government users, absolving the Federal agency of liability in case of personal injury, death, and failure or damage to the non-Government user's experiments or equipment. The agreement must also contain a statement that the non-Government user will comply with all safety regulations and procedures while using such facilities.
§ 122.724 Quarterly inspections. ( a ) Each winch control apparatus of a launching appliance on a vessel, including motor controllers, emergency switches, master switches, and limit switches, must be examined once in each 3 months.
( b ) The examination required by paragraph (a) of this section must include the removal of drain plugs and the opening of drain valves to make sure that enclosures are free of water.
#### § 73b.2 Rules and regulations.

This part will be applied in conformance with the standards established by the Office of Government Ethics in its regulations, 5 CFR part 737, and interpretations thereof. Former officers and employees of the Department may request advice and assistance in compliance with those regulations from the Assistant General Counsel, Business and Administrative Law Division, Department of Health and Human Services.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
  
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael D. Michie, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated:
      November 20, 2008
              /s/ Michael D.
      MichieMichael
      D. MichieChief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

______________________________________ 

Amy Davis , 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Quicken Loans, Inc., 

 Defendant. 

______________________________________ 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No.: 2:14-cv-12665 

 

Hon. George Caram Steeh 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WHEREAS, the parties in the above-captioned action wish to discontinue the litigation; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and/or their 

respective counsel as follows that, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action 

is hereby dismissed against Quicken Loans, Inc. with prejudice and without costs to any party. 

Amy Davis 

___/s/ Sergei Lemberg__________ 

Sergei Lemberg, Esq. 

LEMBERG Law, LLC 

1100 Summer Street, 3rd Floor 

Stamford, CT 06905 

Tel: (203) 653-2250 

slemberg@lemberglaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Quicken Loans, Inc. 

_/s/_ Jeffrey B. Morganroth __________ 

Jeffrey B. Morganroth (P41670) 

Jill A. Gurfinkel (P56919) 

MORGANROTH & MORGANROTH, PLLC

344 N. Old Woodward, Suite 200 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Tel: (248) 864-4000 

jmorganroth@morganrothlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 

SO ORDERED 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: January 5, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-12665-GCS-MJH ECF No. 18 filed 01/05/15 PageID.174 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on December 31, 2014, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Stipulation of Dismissal was served electronically by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern 

District of Michigan Electronic Document Filing System (ECF), which sent notice of such filing 

to the following: 

Jeffrey B. Morganroth 

Morganroth & Morganroth, PLLC 

344 N. Old Woodward, Suite 200 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

 By_/s/ Sergei Lemberg_________

 Sergei Lemberg, Esq. 

Case 2:14-cv-12665-GCS-MJH ECF No. 18 filed 01/05/15 PageID.175 Page 2 of 2
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A (this “report”) of ONE Bio Corp.; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |   |                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:  April 21, 2011  | By:    | /s/ Cris Neely     |   |
|                                  |   | Cris Neely              |   |
|                                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                  |   |                    |   |
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                                  CERTIFICATION

By signing below, each of the undersigned  officers hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,  (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the  information  contained  in this  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Lincoln
Bancorp.

Signed this 12th day of November 2003.


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER:                   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER:

/s/ John M. Baer                           /s/ T. Tim Unger
-----------------------------------        -------------------------------------
John M. Baer                               T. Tim Unger
Secretary and Treasurer                    President and Chief Executive Officer






A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by Section  906,  has been  provided  to Lincoln  Bancorp  and will be
retained  by Lincoln  Bancorp  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
2:14-cr-20525-LJM-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 09/12/14 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 18
2:14-cr-20525-LJM-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 09/12/14 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 19
2:14-cr-20525-LJM-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 09/12/14 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 20
2:14-cr-20525-LJM-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 09/12/14 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 21
2:14-cr-20525-LJM-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 09/12/14 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 22
Press Office
1325 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463
Phone: Local 523-4065 Tall Free 800-424-9530

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JANUARY 16, 1981

WASHINGTON -- The number of political action committees (Pac's) is
continuing to grow, based on end-of-year figures released today by the
Federal Election Commission. In its semi-annual report on PAC growth,
the FHC charts an increase of more than 500 PAC's over the past year.

The agency's figures date back to 1974, prior to enactment of the
first amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which
spurred PAC activity.

Figures at that time showed 608 committees in existence in December
1974. ‘That number rose to 1,146 at the end of 1976, and now numbers 2,551.

The FEC chart, shown below, categorizes the number of PAC's in six
groupings, based on the sponsoring organization of each.

“PAC” GROWTH — FROM 1974

JANUARY 1981,

PRESS OFFICE
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

COMMITTEE TYPE

CORPORATE

LABOR

TRADE/MEMBERSHIP
HEALTH

NON-CONNECTED

COOPERATIVE

CORPORATION W/O STOCK
TOTAL 608 | 124] 10 | 722 | 296

*1 On November 24, 1878, the Commision muad Advisory Opinion 1976-23 “BUNPAG

'°2 On Sey 11, 1978, ha Prasicant sgned the Federal Election Campaign Act Amendment of 187%, 9... 96-282.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 
 CERTIFICATION I, Marie J. Toulantis, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of barnesandnoble.com inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2004 By:
    /s/ Marie J. ToulantisMarie J. ToulantisChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
barnesandnoble.com inc. 22
# C_2008143EN.01000701.xml

| 10.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 143/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27.2.2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | E 8/06 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Region | Vlaamse Gemeenschap |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Financiering publieke omroep VRT |
| Legal basis | Decreten betreffende de radio-omroep en de televisie, gecoördineerd op 4 maart 2005
  Beheersovereenkomst 2007-2011 tussen de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en de VRT van 20 juli 2006 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Services of general economic interest |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 300 million
  Overall budget: EUR 1 500 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | 2007-2011 |
| Economic sectors | Media |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Vlaamse Gemeenschap |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

27.2.2008

Reference number of the aid

E 8/06

Member State

Belgium

Region

Vlaamse Gemeenschap

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Financiering publieke omroep VRT

Legal basis

Decreten betreffende de radio-omroep en de televisie, gecoördineerd op 4 maart 2005

Beheersovereenkomst 2007-2011 tussen de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en de VRT van 20 juli 2006

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Services of general economic interest

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 300 million

Overall budget: EUR 1 500 million

Intensity

—

Duration

2007-2011

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

Vlaamse Gemeenschap

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY. JUNE 7, 2012 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of May 24, 2012 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-17: Red BlueT LLC, Armour Media, Inc., 

and m-Qube, Inc. 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-18: National Right to Life Committee, Inc. 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-19: American Future Fund 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on The Legacy Committee 

Political Action Committee (A09-22) 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on The Democratic Executive 

Committee of Florida (DECF) (A08-03) 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on The Los Angeles County 

Democratic Central Committee (A09-07) 

Management and Administrative Matters 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Signed: 

Submitted: May 31, 2012 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220
FEDERAE#ELECTION :

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE
SUNDAY - JANUARY 17, 1982

PAC'S INCREASE AT DECLINING RATE
WASHINGTON - the Federal Election Commission released new figures today which
show that the number of political action committees, PAC's, continues to grow.

However, the overall growth rate has slowed fram an average of 21% per
year to 14% for 1981.

.’ Numbering 2,901 at the end of 1981, the number of PAC's now in existence

iis five times the number that were active at the end of 1974, just prior to

the implementation of the 1974 Amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act -
legislation which outlined for the first time the legal parameters of PAC activity.

Figures released by the FEC in July 1981, showed a 5% growth rate for the
first six months of the year. The last six months of the year saw an increase
of 8%. The six-month growth rate since 1978, has been 11-14%.

Yearly increases, since 1976, have hovered around 21%, with the exception
of 1979-80, when the growth actually increased by 28%. The most dramatic increase
was seen between 1974 and 1976, when PAC ranks swelled by 88%.

PAC's are viewed by many campaign finance experts as a predominant force
in politics. Their numbers, as well as the amount of money they spend in
Federal campaigns, have continued to increase with each election cycle.

According to FEC data, the "non-connected" category of PAC's shows the
greatest increase. That category includes ideological committees and committees
sponsored by particular issue groups.

A final report on the amount of money raised and spent by PAC's during the
1979-80 election cycle will be released by the FEC in the near future.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
PRESS OFFICE
(202) 523-4065,
(800) 424-9530

“PAC” GROWTH—FROM 1974

COMMITTEE TYPE
CORPORATE
LABOR

TRADE/MEMBERSHIP
HEALTH

NON-CONNECTED
COOPERATIVE
CORPORATION W/O STOCK

TOTAL

Yon November 24, 1975, the Commission itsusd Advisory Opinion 1976-23 “SUNPAC.”
2on May 11, 1976, the President signed the Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976, P.L, 94-283.

-30-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRIAN WITTMAN,

Plaintiff, Case Number 14-12954

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

ROSEMARY REAUME, R. DAVONPORT,

RICK RAYMOND, CORIZON HEALTH,

INC., DANIEL H. HEYNS, and THOMAS

R. COMBS,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND

TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Presently before the Court is the report issued on February 19, 2015 by Magistrate Judge R.

Steven Whalen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the motions to

transfer venue filed by the defendants and transfer the case to the Western District of Michigan. 

Although the magistrate judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to

and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections

have been filed thus far. The parties’ failure to file objections to the report and recommendation

waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370,

1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the

Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [dkt.

#35] is ADOPTED.

2:14-cv-12954-DML-RSW Doc # 36 Filed 03/10/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 214
It is further ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss or in the alternative to

transfer venue [dkt. #5, 19] are GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk of the Court shall TRANSFER

this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The motions are

DENIED in all other respects.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: March 10, 2015

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on March 10, 2015.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-

2:14-cv-12954-DML-RSW Doc # 36 Filed 03/10/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 215