alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008057EN.01000301.xml

| 1.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 57/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21.1.2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 457/07 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | Marche |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Promozione della ricerca industriale e dello sviluppo sperimentale in filiere tecnologico-produttive — Marche |
| Legal basis | Bando per la promozione della ricerca industriale e dello sviluppo sperimentale in filiere tecnologico-produttive |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Research and development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 30 million |
| Intensity | 80 % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Regione Marche |
| Via Tiziano, 44 |
| I-60100 Ancona |

Date of adoption of the decision

21.1.2008

Reference number of the aid

N 457/07

Member State

Italy

Region

Marche

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Promozione della ricerca industriale e dello sviluppo sperimentale in filiere tecnologico-produttive — Marche

Legal basis

Bando per la promozione della ricerca industriale e dello sviluppo sperimentale in filiere tecnologico-produttive

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Research and development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 30 million

Intensity

80 %

Duration

Until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Regione Marche

Via Tiziano, 44

I-60100 Ancona

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
- 3295
- 3296
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                               
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                   |  | 
|      |  |                   |  | 
|DATE: |  | November 13, 2006 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                                                                                      
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Anna Hughes, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Hughes, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Electric Light and Power Company of Syracuse, Appellant.

*Hughes*v. *Electric Light*c6 *Power Go. of Syracuse,*129 App. Div. 931, affirmed.

(Argued January 7, 1910;

decided January 25, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 12, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have occurred through the defendant’s negligence.

*W. P. Goodelle*for appellant.

*Thomas Hogan*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Edward T. Bartlett, J.
§ 130.230 Protection from refrigerants. ( a ) For each refrigeration system that exceeds 0.6 cubic meters (20 cubic feet) of storage capacity if using ammonia or other hazardous gas, or exceeds 28.3 cubic meters (1,000 cubic feet) of storage capacity if using a fluorocarbon, as a refrigerant, there must be available one pressure-demand, open-circuit, self-contained breathing apparatus, approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and having at a minimum a 30-minute air supply, and a full facepiece.
( b ) Each self-contained breathing apparatus must be stowed convenient to, but outside, the space containing the refrigeration equipment.
( c ) A complete recharge in the form of a spare charge must be carried for each self-contained breathing apparatus. The spare charge must be stowed with the equipment it is to reactivate.
( d ) The self-contained breathing apparatus in a fireman's outfit, if fitted, complies with this section.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2470
In Re: TYRONE THOMAS, Debtor.

_________________________ MARIE BAXTER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-986-A, BK-90-10983-AB) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Tyrone Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Neil David Goldman, YOUNG, GOLDMAN, & VAN BEEK, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirmingthe bankruptcy court's orders imposing monetary sanctions on Appellant for failure to comply with discovery orders and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baxter v. Thomas , No. CA-96-986-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES  AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS  AND DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER COMBINED FIXED CHARGES  AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS  (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)  (UNAUDITED)
 FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes, minority interest and
losses from equity investments
    
    $
    536
    
    
    $
    1,064
    
    
    $
    1,066
    
    
    $
    (1,002
    )
    
    $
    (7,083
    )Less: Interest capitalized during the period
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4Less: Minority interest in pretax income of
subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed
charges
    
    
    (34
    )
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    371
    
    
    
    405
    
    
    
    473
    
    
    
    442
    
    
    
    577Total earnings (loss) to cover fixed charges
    
    
    941
    
    
    
    1,439
    
    
    
    1,539
    
    
    
    (560
    )
    
    
    (6,510
    )Fixed charges:Total interest expense including
capitalized interest
    
    
    324
    
    
    
    341
    
    
    
    396
    
    
    
    353
    
    
    
    469Interest portion of rental expenses
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    64
    
    
    
    77
    
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    108Total fixed charges
    
    
    371
    
    
    
    405
    
    
    
    473
    
    
    
    442
    
    
    
    577Preferred stock dividends and accretion
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (12
    )
    
    
    103
    
    
    
    167Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividend requirements
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    3.3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Deficiency of earnings to cover combined
fixed charges and preferred stock dividend
requirements
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1,105
    
    
    $
    7,254
§ 140.515 Training requirements. ( a ) All crewmembers must be provided with health and safety information and training that includes: ( 1 ) Content and procedures of the owner or managing operator's health and safety plan;
( 2 ) Procedures for reporting unsafe conditions;
( 3 ) Proper selection and use of PPE appropriate to the vessel operation;
( 4 ) Safe use of equipment including deck machinery, rigging, welding and cutting, hand tools, ladders, and abrasive wheel machinery found onboard the vessel;
( 5 ) Hazard communication and cargo knowledge;
( 6 ) Safe use and storage of hazardous materials and chemicals;
( 7 ) Confined space entry;
( 8 ) Respiratory protection; and
( 9 ) Lockout/Tagout procedures.
( b ) Individuals, other than crewmembers, must be provided with sufficient information or training on hazards relevant to their potential exposure on or around the vessel.
( c ) Crewmember training required by this section must be conducted as soon as practicable, but not later than 5 days after employment.
( d ) Refresher training must be repeated annually and may be conducted over time in modules covering specific topics. Refresher training may be less comprehensive, provided that the information presented is sufficient to provide employees with continued understanding of workplace hazards. The refresher training of persons subject to this subpart must include the information and training prescribed in this section.
( e ) The owner, managing operator, or master must determine the appropriate training and information to provide to each individual permitted on the vessel who is not a crewmember, relative to the expected risk exposure of the individual.
( f ) All training required in this section must be documented in owner or managing operator's records.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

STEVE MAHAC, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-13207 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

VALLEY TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICE, INC., 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT (ECF #13) 

 On May 11, 2015, Defendant Valley Transportation Service, Inc. filed a 

Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). (See ECF #13.) The Court held a 

hearing on the Motion on July 13, 2015. Having fully reviewed the parties’ written 

submissions, and having held oral argument on the Motion, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Motion (ECF #13) is DENIED for the reasons stated on the 

record. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: July 13, 2015 

2:14-cv-13207-MFL-DRG Doc # 17 Filed 07/13/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 708
    2 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on July 13, 2015, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-13207-MFL-DRG Doc # 17 Filed 07/13/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 709
§ 401.12 Cuban and Haitian entrant cash and medical assistance. Except as may be otherwise provided in this section, cash and medical assistance shall be provided to Cuban and Haitian entrants by the same agencies, under the same conditions, and to the same extent as such assistance is provided to refugees under part 400 of this title. ( a ) For purposes of determining the eligibility of Cuban and Haitian entrants for cash and medical assistance under this section and the amount of assistance for which they are eligible under this section, the same standards and criteria shall be applied as are applied in the determination of eligibility for an amount of cash and medical assistance for refugees under subparts E and G of part 400 of this title.
( b ) Federal reimbursement will be provided to States for the costs of providing cash and medical assistance (and related administrative costs) to Cuban and Haitian entrants according to procedures and requirements, including procedures and requirements relating to the submission and approval of a State plan, identical to those applicable to the Refugee Program and set forth in part 400 of this title.
( c ) The number of months during which an entrant may be eligible for cash and medical assistance for which Federal reimbursement is available under this section shall be counted starting with the first month in which an individual meeting the definition of a Cuban and Haitian entrant in § 401.2 was first issued documentation by the Immigration and Naturalization Service indicating: ( 1 ) That the entrant has been granted parole by the Attorney General under the Immigration and Nationality Act,
( 2 ) That the entrant is in a voluntary departure status, or
( 3 ) That the entrant's residence in a United States community is known to the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
The amendments are to be issued under the authority contained in section 412(a)(9), Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1522(a)(9)). [47 FR 10850, Mar. 12, 1982, as amended at 65 FR 15450, Mar. 22, 2000]
#### § 111.40-5 Enclosure.

Each panelboard must have a noncombustible enclosure that meets §§ 111.01-7 and 111.01-9.

[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28279, June 4, 1996]
#### § 144.130 A vessel built to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended, requirements.

A vessel built to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended, is considered to be in compliance with this part.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TRACEY SMITH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:14-cv-13795 

v. District Judge David M. Lawson 

 Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

THE FOOD BANK OF EASTERN 

MICHIGAN, 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY 

RESPONSES TO THE COURT 

 Plaintiff has filed multiple motions to compel discovery. (DE 33, 35, 40, 

and 46.) This matter is set for a hearing on December 23, 2015 to hear the pending 

motions. In its response(s), Defendant contends that it has provided the discovery 

responses, making Plaintiff’s motions moot. (See, e.g., DE 36 at 2.) Defendant did 

not, however, provide its responses as an exhibit. 

 To aid in the Court’s review, Defendant is hereby ordered to provide its 

responses to the discovery requests propounded by Plaintiff (excluding any 

documents provided). Defendant shall file its responses on the Court’s docket ON 

OR BEFORE DECEMBER 22, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. 

2:14-cv-13795-DML-APP Doc # 53 Filed 12/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 937
2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 21, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on December 21, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 

s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:14-cv-13795-DML-APP Doc # 53 Filed 12/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 938
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Flight-deck awareness [electronicresource].**
 
2nded.|4thed|5thed
 
SuDoc Number:D 202.19/2:

Item Number: 0374-A-05(online)

CGP systemNumber:000764848
August 17, 2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON V. SIDERIO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 32 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file a 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
§ 111.55-1 General. ( a ) Each switch must meet Article 404 of NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference; see “§ 110.10-1 of this subchapter).
( b ) Each switch that is in the weather must be in a watertight enclosure and be externally operable.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65198, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16363, Mar. 16, 2023]
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 80 filed 04/21/16 PageID.486 Page 1 of 1
§ 108.143 Accommodation space. ( a ) Each corridor bulkhead in an accommodation space must be an A class or B class bulkhead except if an A class bulkhead is specifically required by this part.
( b ) No door in a corridor bulkhead in an accommodation space may have a louver, except that a stateroom, lounge, or recreation room door may have louvers in its lower half.
( c ) Each stairtower, elevator, and dumbwaiter, and other trunk must be enclosed by A class bulkheads.
( d ) Each bulkhead not described under paragraph (a) of this section must be either A class, B class, or C class bulkheads.
( e ) At least one opening to each stairway must be enclosed by either A class or B class bulkheads and doors.
( f ) Each stairtower must have doors at all levels and each must be an A class door.
( g ) Each door required by paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section— ( 1 ) Must be self-closing;
( 2 ) May not have any means to permanently hold the door open, except for magnetic holdbacks that are operated from the bridge or other remote location.
( h ) Interior stairs, including stringers and treads, must be made of steel or an equivalent material.
( i ) Except in washrooms and toilet spaces, each deck covering in an accommodation space must be made of an approved material, except an overlay on a deck for leveling or finishing that is not more than 9.375 millimeters (3 ⁄ 8 inch) thick.
( j ) Except as provided in paragraph (1), each ceiling, lining, insulation, and pipe and duct lagging in an accommodation space must be made of an approved material that is noncombustible.
( k ) Each sheathing, furring, or holding piece used to secure a bulkhead, ceiling, lining, or insulation in an accommodation space must be made of an approved material that is non-combustible.
( l ) No bulkhead, lining, or ceiling in an accommodation space may have a combustible veneer greater than 2 millimeters (1 ⁄ 12 inch) in thickness.
( m ) Each corridor or hidden space in an accommodation space may be covered by an approved interior finish or a reasonable number of coats of paint. However, no corridor or hidden space may have combustible veneer, trim, or decoration except material approved under Subpart 164.012 of this chapter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 

BOSTON DIVISION 

___________________________________ 

 ) 

ROBINSON COMMITTEE, LLC and ) 

JACK E. ROBINSON, ) 

 ) Case Number: 1:10-cv-11335-GAO 

Petitioners, ) District Judge George A. O’Toole, Jr. 

) 

v. ) RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

 ) TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) MOTION TO DISMISS 

 ) 

 Respondent. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

RESPONDENT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(b)(3), respondent Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or 

“Commission”) moves for leave to file a reply to petitioners’ Memorandum in Opposition to the 

FEC’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition. As explained in its accompanying memorandum in 

support, the FEC respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion because petitioners’ 

Memorandum raises new requests for relief and is, in effect, a motion for sanctions, which the 

Commission should have an opportunity to address. 

On Thursday, October 14, 2010, Commission counsel conferred with counsel for 

petitioners and attempted in good faith to resolve whether the Court should grant leave to file the 

reply brief. 

 WHEREFORE, the FEC respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for leave to 

reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss the Petition. 

Case 1:10-cv-11335-GAO Document 8 Filed 10/19/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

Respectfully submitted, 

Phillip Christopher Hughey 

Acting General Counsel 

David Kolker 

Associate General Counsel 

Kevin Deeley 

Assistant General Counsel 

/s/ Kevin P. Hancock 

Kevin P. Hancock 

Attorney 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

(202) 694-1650 

Dated: October 19, 2010 e-mail: khancock@fec.gov 

Certificate of Service

I, Kevin P. Hancock, certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent 

electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) 

and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on October 19, 

2010. 

Dated: October 19, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Kevin P. Hancock 

Kevin P. Hancock 

Certification of Consultation 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(2)

I, Kevin P. Hancock, hereby certify, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(2), that counsel for the 

FEC has conferred with opposing counsel and has attempted in good faith to resolve or narrow 

the issue. 

Dated: October 19, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Kevin P. Hancock 

Kevin P. Hancock 

Case 1:10-cv-11335-GAO Document 8 Filed 10/19/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Loral Space & Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Avi Katz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              |                                       |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|              |                                       |
|              | /s/ AVI KATZ                               |
|              | Avi Katz                                   |
|              | President, General Counsel & Secretary |
|              |                                       |
| December 19, 2019 |                                       |