alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 111.70-3 Motor controllers and motor-control centers. ( a ) *General.* The enclosure for each motor controller or motor-control center must meet either NEMA ICS 2 and NEMA ICS 2.3, or Table 1 of IEC 60092-201:2019 (all incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter), as appropriate, for the location where it is installed. In addition, each such enclosure in a hazardous location must meet the requirements of subpart 111.105 of this part. NEMA ICS 2.4 (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter) provides guidance on the differences between devices meeting NEMA and those meeting IEC for motor service.
( b ) *Low-voltage release.* Each motor controller for a fire pump, elevator, steering gear, or auxiliary that is vital to the vessel's propulsion system, except a motor controller for a vital propulsion auxiliary which can be restarted from a central control station, must have low-voltage release if automatic restart after a voltage failure or its resumption to operation is not hazardous. If automatic restart is hazardous, the motor controller must have low-voltage protection. Motor controllers for other motors must not have low-voltage release unless the starting current and the short-time sustained current of the additional low-voltage release load is within the capacity of one ship's service generator. Automatic sequential starting of low-voltage release controllers is acceptable to meet this paragraph.
( c ) *Low-voltage protection.* Each motor controller must have low-voltage protection, except for the following motor controllers: ( 1 ) A motor controller that has low-voltage release under paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) A motor controller for a motor of less than 2 horsepower (1.5 kW).
( d ) *Identification of controllers.* ( 1 ) Each motor controller and motor control center must be marked externally with the following information: ( i ) Manufacturer's name or identification.
( ii ) Voltage.
( iii ) Number of phases.
( iv ) Current.
( v ) kW (Horsepower).
( vi ) Identification of motor being controlled.
( vii ) Current rating of trip setting.
( 2 ) Each controller must be provided with heat durable and permanent elementary wiring/schematic diagrams of the controller located on the door interior.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28281, June 4, 1996; 61 FR 33045, June 26, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65199, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60153, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16364, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


|                                                                         | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Trent B. Troyer                                                      | 
|Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 28, 2010 |
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/24 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
      AND 15d-14(b)**




**(Section 906
      Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Imaging Systems, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
      Vogel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of
                the
                Company.




/s/  *John
      Vogel*


John
      Vogel


Chief
      Executive Officer


International
      Imaging Systems, Inc.





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 11.1      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS




                                                      JUNE 30
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                        1997           1996           1995
                                     -----------    -----------    -----------

PRIMARY:

Average shares outstanding             3,695,000      2,355,000      1,578,000


Net effect of stock and warrant 
     issuances with exercise prices 
     below the initial public 
     offering price based on 
     the treasury stock method              --             --           65,000
                                     -----------    -----------    -----------

Total                                  3,695,000      2,355,000      1,643,000
                                     ===========    ===========    ===========


   
Net Loss                             $(4,434,482)   $(2,966,287)   $(1,846,183)
                                     ===========    ===========    ===========

Per share amount                     $     (1.20)   $     (1.26)   $     (1.12)
                                     ===========    ===========    ===========
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; MLSCN HTS Assay.                    

*Date:*                         April 30-May 1, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         5 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Jurys Washington Hotel, 1500 New Hampshire Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20036.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yong Yao, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6149, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-6102,                         *yyao@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 27, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1692  Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 29, 2010

p1228 

# Order

December 29, 2010

139350 & (50)

CONNIE COLAIANNI, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 139350 COA: 282587 Oakland CC: 2003-051245-NO STUART FRANKEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC ., and K-F LAND COMPANY, LLC IV, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a sti pulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this appeal is considered, and the appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
§ 84.16 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department.
( b ) The standards used to determine whether paragraph (a) of this section has been violated shall be the standards applied under title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12111 *et seq.,* and, as such sections relate to employment, the provisions of sections 501 through 504 and 511 of the ADA of 1990, as amended (codified at 42 U.S.C. 12201-12204, 12210), as implemented in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's regulation at 29 CFR part 1630.
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 81 filed 04/21/16 PageID.487 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 81 filed 04/21/16 PageID.488 Page 2 of 2
§ 34.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part prescribes polices and procedures for handling claims not in excess of $40,000.00 filed by employees against the Department of Health and Human Services under the Military Personnel and Civilian Employees Claims (MPCE) Act of 1964, 31 U.S.C. 3721, for damage to, or loss of, property against the Department. Under the MPCE Act, the Secretary may approve claims made against the Government by a federal government employee for damage to or loss of personal property that is incident to employment when the loss or damage is not due to any negligence on the part of employee.
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies to all Departmental Operating Divisions and Regional Offices that process and review claims under the MPCE Act. Nothing in this part shall be construed to bar other types of claims that are payable under other statutory authority such as, but not limited to, the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671-2680).
§ 129.120 Alternative standards. ( a ) An OSV of 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length or less may meet the following requirements of the American Yacht and Boat Council Projects, where applicable, instead of § 129.340 of this part: ( 1 ) E-1, Bonding of Direct Current Systems.
( 2 ) E-8, AC Electrical Systems on Boats.
( 3 ) E-9, DC Electrical Systems on Boats.
( b ) An OSV with an electrical installation operating at a potential of less than 50 volts may comply with 33 CFR 183.430 instead of § 129.340 of this part.
# C_2011319EN.01001001.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 August 2011 — Jutta Leth v Republic of Austria, Land Niederösterreich

(Case C-420/11)

2011/C 319/17

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jutta Leth

Applicant:

Defendants: Republic of Austria, Land Niederösterreich

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 3 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985, (1) in the version of Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997, (2) and Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 (3) (‘EIA Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that

1

2

3

| 1. | the term ‘material assets’ covers only their substance or also their value; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the term ‘material assets’ covers only their substance or also their value;

| 2. | the environmental impact assessment serves also to protect an individual against pecuniary damage as a result of a decrease in the value of his property? |
| --- | --- |

2.

the environmental impact assessment serves also to protect an individual against pecuniary damage as a result of a decrease in the value of his property?

---

(1)  Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40.

1

(2)  Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, OJ 1997 L 73, p. 5.

2

(3)  Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC — Statement by the Commission, OJ 2003 L 156, p. 17.

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2092 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                    September 27, 2010.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2092) entitled ``An Act to amend the National Children's Island Act of 
1995 to expand allowable uses for Kingman and Heritage Islands by the 
District of Columbia, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the 
following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 4, line 3, strike [the] and insert a portion of the

(2)On page 4, line 6, strike [for another recreational, environmental, 
or educational purpose, except that the reversionary interest of the 
United States under this paragraph shall expire upon the expiration of 
the 30-year period which begins on the date of the enactment of the 
Kingman and Heritage Islands Act of 2009.] and insert the Comprehensive 
Plan.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 2092

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
EX-10.4.1


  Exhibit 10.4.1

 
 

	
 	 InMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 Suite #340- 200 Granville St.

Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4
 Canada

 


  

 
  
  

 
  
 13 April
2018
  
  
 Dear
Eric,
  
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
recently conducted a thorough review of InMed’s compensation programs, including salary, bonus and equity position of its employees versus industry standards for both private and public biotechnology companies in Canada and the US.

 
 This letter addresses two components, salary level and target annual bonus.

 
 I am pleased to confirm your annualized salary level of
$140,000, less statutory withholdings, in recognition of your 50% time commitment to your duties as VP of Pre-clinical R&D of InMed. I suggest we revisit this time commitment on a quarterly basis and make any adjustments as needed to best
reflect your efforts.
  
 Additionally, your annual target bonus will
be 30% of your annual salary. Achieving this target bonus will be dependent on several factors, including the Corporate and individual goals for your position as defined on an annual basis. Review of the achievement of these goals will take place
after our fiscal year end on June 30 and the bonus will be payable subsequent to that analysis.
  

On behalf of the entire Management Team and Board of Directors, thank you for your contributions to the Company’s success and we look forward to
achieving more, together.
  
 /s/ Eric A. Adams 

Eric A. Adams President and CEO
 InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.
#### MORRIS COHEN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LENA BARONE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided June 21, 1929.

Before Justices Paejcek, Black and Bodine.

For the plaintiff-appellant, *Weinberger & Weinberger.*

For the defendant-respondent, *Feinberg & Feinberg.*

Pee Cueiam.

This suit was in replevin, '"mught in the Bayonne District *571Court, to recover certain store fixtures set out in a schedule under a written agreement, executed at New York, on the 22d day ol February, 1927, for $375, payable in installments. The balance due the defendant was secured by three promissory notes. A counter-claim was filed, demanding damages in the sum of $450, setting up that the plaintiff neglected to perform the labor in a good workmanlike manner and failed to furnish first-class material, or properly install the articles in accordance with the terms of the contract. The trial of the ease resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff filed nine specifications for a new trial. We think the judgment of the District Court of Bayonne should he affirmed. We find no legal merit in any of the grounds of appeal. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
July 7, 2015

Mr. Anthony J. Rojek

210 West Hanna Avenue

Tampa, FL 33604

Dear Mr. Rojek:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 9, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0939), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 
The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Developmental Infrastructure For 
Population Research.
    Date: April 12-13, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 7 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Washington, 515 15th Street, NW., Council Room, 
Washington, DC 20004.
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 435-6911. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99f1f6e9f4f8f7f7f4d9f4f8f0f5b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9d1d6c9d4d8d7d7d4f9d4d8d0d597d7d0d197ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: March 13, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1349 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>