alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008299EN.01000501.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/5

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 17 November 2008

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg

(ECB/2008/16)

(2008/C 299/02)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg's current external auditor will end after the audit for the financial year 2008. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg's current external auditor will end after the audit for the financial year 2008. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2009.

| (3) | The Banque centrale du Luxembourg has selected KPMG AUDIT SARL as its external auditors for the financial years 2009 to 2013, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Banque centrale du Luxembourg has selected KPMG AUDIT SARL as its external auditors for the financial years 2009 to 2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that KPMG AUDIT SARL should be appointed as the external auditors of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg for the financial years 2009 to 2013.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 17 November 2008.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,304
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                   646
<INVENTORY>                                  2,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,271
<PP&E>                                      63,335
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             134,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,200
<BONDS>                                     91,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               134,845
<SALES>                                     39,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,672
<CGS>                                       32,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,456)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (14,560,000.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (14,560,000.000)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William A. Grimshaw, Appellant, *v.*William A. Prendergast, as Register of Kings County, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Grimshaw*v. *Prendergast,*132 App. Div. 937, affirmed.

(Argued December 8, 1909;

decided January 4, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in. the second judicial department, entered May Y, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendant to certify the relator’s payrolls for part of the months of November and December, 1908.

*539
      *Robert H. Wilson*for appellant.

*Jesse Fuller, Jr.,*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann,Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James G. Collins, Respondent, *v.*John F. Ahearn, as President of the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, Defendant, and George F. Scannell, Appellant.

*People ex rel. Collins*v. *Ahearn,*133 App. Div. 53, affirmed.

(Argued November 10, 1909;

decided November 30, 1909.)

Appeal, .by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart*573ment, entered June 18, 1909, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to strike out certain paragraphs of the answer in an action to compel the reinstatement of the relator to a position in the bureau of highways of the borough of Manhattan.

The following question was certified : *“*Should the charges of criminal misconduct as a public official against the relator Oollins, found in paragraph eighth of the answer and return of the defendant Scannell to the alternative Avrit of mandamus herein, commencing with the words *‘*but on the contrary alleges,’ and continuing through the remainder of said paragraph eighth, and also in paragraphs thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth of the said answer and return be stricken out as irrelevant and scandalous ? ”

*Roger B. Wood*and *George Gordon Battle*for appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*of counsel), for John F. Aliearn, as president of the borough of Manhattan.

*Herbert C.*Smyth, *Charles F. Brovm*and *John*W.' *Browne*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Haight, Yann, Weenee, Willaed Baetlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Hisoock, J.
§ 132.200 General. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, each OSV must be equipped with portable and semiportable fire extinguishers that comply with this subpart.
( b ) Each OSV of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must, in addition to complying with the requirements necessary to satisfy § 125.105(a) and (b) of this subchapter, be equipped with the number and type of portable and semiportable fire extinguishers listed in § 34.50 of this chapter.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48938, Aug. 18, 2014]
~ 

### , Wqr 

# Spokane Regional (' 

# Clea n Ai r

Agency 3104 E. Augusta Avenue. Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 477-4727♦ Fax (509) 477-6828♦ www.SpokaneCleanAir.org

June 22, 2015

Kate Kelly, Director Office of Air, Waste and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6 th Ave., Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101
Dear Ms. Kelly: 

### In response to your request, I am writing to confirm that the Spol<ane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA) Regulation 1, Article VIII, Solid Fuel Burning Device Standards, as amended on July 10, 2014, contains a continuous emission limitation, consistent with Federal Clean Air Act requirements and the U.S. 

### Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy regarding excess emissions during start-up, shut-down and malfunction (or upset) conditions.
Regulation 1, Article VIII, section 8.05 prohibits emissions from any solid fuel burning device to exceed an average of twenty percent opacity for six consecutive minutes in any one-hour period. Emissions created during the starting of a new fire for a period not to exceed twenty minutes in any four-hour period are not subject to this opacity limit. However, other requirements of the rule apply to solid fuel 

### burning devices at all times, including during startup. Section 8.06 prohibits the burning of fuel wood that is not seasoned. Section 8.03 defines "seasoned wood" as "wood of any species that has been sufficiently dried so as to contain twenty percent or less moisture by weight." In addition, section 8.06 prohibits at all times burning garbage and other specific materials that would increase emissions. These fuel restrictions constitute work practice requirements that limit emissions during startup conditions. Regulation 1, Article VIII thus includes limits on emissions that apply during all modes of source operation and imposes continuous emission controls on solid fuel burning devices consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act applicable to State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions. Accordingly, Regulation 1, Article VIII creates no exemptions for emissions during any mode of source operation (including startup, shutdown or malfunction/upset conditions). Sincerely,

Julie Oliver Executive Director

C: Correspondence file SFBD SIP file Joanna Ekrem, Ecology- AQP



### working with you for clean air
® contains 30% post-consunier wasle
#### § 111.105-41 Battery rooms.

Each electrical installation in a battery room must meet 46 CFR subpart 111.15 and IEEE 45.1 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 110.10-1).

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65201, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16367, Mar. 16, 2023]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8078

LARRY DEAN LOWRY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

SANDRA F. THOMAS, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00362-RJC)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Dean Lowry, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Dean Lowry seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lowry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 143.500 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to a new towing vessel, as defined in § 136.110 of this subchapter, unless it is an excepted vessel.
( b ) Machinery or electrical systems of a novel design, unusual form, or special material must meet section § 143.210.
( c ) Unless otherwise noted in §§ 143.515 and 143.520, new towing vessels must also meet the requirements of subpart B of this part.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: <twlohner@aep.com> Date: 7/22/2010 10:03 AM Subject: Fw: ICR extension request from American Electric Power (AEP) Attachments: pic21839.gif; [Untitled].pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following American Electric Power (AEP) facilities:

John E. Amos Big Sandy Cardinal Clifty Creek Clinch River Conesville Flint Creek General James M. Gavin Glen Lyn Kammer Kanawha River Kyger Creek Lieberman Mitchell Mountaineer Muskingum River Northeastern Oklaunion Picway Pirkey Riverside Rockport Philip Sporn Tanners Creek Welsh Wilkes

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 and Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are granted for Version 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for plants receiving this questionnaire remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic21839.gif)----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/ DC/USEPA/US on 07/22/2010 09:38 AM

-----

From: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US

To: steam_record <steam_record@erg.com>

Cc: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/08/2010 10:43 AM

Subject: ICR extension reques t from American Electric Power (AEP)

Please see attached file -- letter from American Electric Power requesting extension of the ICR deadline for 26 plants.
#### § 114.120 Vessels on an international voyage.

A mechanically propelled vessel that carries more than 12 passengers on an international voyage must comply with the applicable requirements of SOLAS as well as this subchapter.
§ 108.171 Class I, Division 1 locations. The following are Class I, Division 1 locations: ( a ) An enclosed space that contains any part of the mud circulating system that has an opening into the space and is between the well and final degassing discharge.
( b ) An enclosed or semi-enclosed location that is below the drill floor, and contains a possible source of gas release.
( c ) An enclosed space that is on the drill floor, and is not separated by a solid, gas-light floor from the spaces specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) A space that would normally be considered a Division 2 location under § 108.173 but where combustible or flammable gases might accumulate.
( e ) A location in the weather, or a semi-enclosed location, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section that is within 1.5 m (5 ft.) of the boundary of any— ( 1 ) Equipment or opening specified in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Ventilation outlet, access, or other opening to a Class I, Division 1 space; or
( 3 ) Gas vent outlet.
( f ) Except as provided in § 108.175, an enclosed space that has an opening into a Class I, Division 1 location.
#### § 130.210 Radiotelegraph and radiotelephone.

Each vessel must comply with 47 CFR part 80 as applicable.
§ 143.410 Shipboard lighting. ( a ) Sufficient lighting suitable for the marine environment must be provided within crew working and living areas.
( b ) Emergency lighting must be provided for all internal crew working and living areas. Emergency lighting sources must provide for sufficient illumination under emergency conditions to facilitate egress from each space and must be either: ( 1 ) Automatic, battery-operated with a duration of no less than 2 hours; or
( 2 ) Non-electric, phosphorescent adhesive lighting strips that are installed along escape routes and sufficiently visible to enable egress with no power.
( c ) Each towing vessel must be equipped with at least two portable, battery-powered lights. One must be located in the pilothouse and the other at the access to the engine room.
#### § 147A.31 Removal of fumigation material and warning signs.

After ventilation is completed and a marine chemist or other qualified person determines that there is no danger to the health and safety of any person under § 147A.21(d) or § 147A.23(g), the person in charge of fumigation, or, if the vessel has left port, the person in charge of the vessel, shall ensure that all warning signs are removed and fumigation containers and materials are removed and disposed of in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
#### § 140.600 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all towing vessels unless otherwise specified. Certain vessels remain subject to the navigation safety regulations in 33 CFR part 164.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notification of Item Added to Meeting 
Agenda

DATE OF MEETING: March 28, 2007.

STATUS: Closed.

PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 72 FR 14312, March 27, 2007.

ADDITION: Proposed Filing with the Postal Regulatory Commission for an 
Extension of the Market Test for Repositionable Notes. At its closed 
meeting on March 28, 2007, the Board of Governors of the United States 
Postal Service voted unanimously to add this item to the agenda of its 
closed meeting and that no earlier announcement was possible. The 
General Counsel of the United States Postal Service certified that in 
her opinion discussion of this item could be properly closed to public 
observation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-1717 Filed 4-3-07; 3:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-914.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ATOMIC ENERGY 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SOUTH AFRICA 

Signed at Vienna September 14, 2009 

 with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SOUTH AFRICA 

Atomic Energy: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Vienna September 14, 2009; 

 Entered into force September 14, 2009. 

 With annex.
#### § 111.60-3 [Reserved]
#### § 670.1 Purpose of regulations.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to conserve and protect the native mammals, birds, plants, and invertebrates of Antarctica and the ecosystem upon which they depend and to implement the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541, as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism, and Conservation Act of 1996, Public Law 104-227.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology, American Health Information Community Chronic Care 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 14th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: April 16, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/chroniccare/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will discuss barriers to 
availability of care in the virtual setting. The meeting will be 
available via Web cast. For additional information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/chroniccare/cc_instruct.html.

Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-1669 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 75.400 Policy guide. The application of these cost principles is based on the fundamental premises that: ( a ) The non-Federal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the Federal award through the application of sound management practices.
( b ) The non-Federal entity assumes responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
( c ) The non-Federal entity, in recognition of its own unique combination of staff, facilities, and experience, has the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary in order to assure proper and efficient administration of the Federal-award.
( d ) The application of these cost principles should require no significant changes in the internal accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. However, the accounting practices of the non-Federal entity must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by the principles, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal award.
( e ) In reviewing, negotiating and approving cost allocation plans or indirect cost proposals, the cognizant agency for indirect costs should generally assure that the non-Federal entity is applying these cost accounting principles on a consistent basis during their review and negotiation of indirect cost proposals. Where wide variations exist in the treatment of a given cost item by the non-Federal entity, the reasonableness and equity of such treatments should be fully considered. See § 75.2 *Indirect (facilities & administrative (F&A)) costs.*
( f ) For non-Federal entities that educate and engage students in research, the dual role of students as both trainees and employees (including pre- and post-doctoral staff) contributing to the completion of Federal awards for research must be recognized in the application of these principles.
( g ) The non-Federal entity may not earn or keep any profit resulting from Federal financial assistance, unless explicitly authorized by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See also § 75.307.