alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             609
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             710
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,542
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,571    
<LOANS>                                         20,038
<ALLOWANCE>                                        170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,522
<DEPOSITS>                                      22,613
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                228
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,681 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  24,522
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,127
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  168
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    40
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,335
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 791 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 791
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              544
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        8
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    143
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         105
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.23
<LOANS-NON>                                         34
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   164
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  170
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               170
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 107.05 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f) which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| § 107.305 | 1625-0038 |
| § 107.309 | 1625-0038 |
| § 109.227 | 1625-0064 |

[49 FR 38121, Sept. 27, 1984, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41823, Sept. 11, 1992; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58348, Sept. 30, 2004]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2259

MONIKA AHMADPOUR-BAHNAMIRI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00701-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monika Ahmadpour-Bahnamiri, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Monika Ahmadpour-Bahnamiri appeals the district court’s order dismissing with 

prejudice her amended complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018). We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Ahmadpour-Bahnamiri v. U.S. Postal Serv., No. 

1:18-cv-00701-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1050

___________

Gerry C. DuBose, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Jennifer L. Carey; John D. Kelly; Hanft, *

Fride, O’Brien, Harries, Swelbar & * [UNPUBLISHED]

Burns, P.A., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 4, 2009 

Filed: June 8, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Nearly two years after this court affirmed the adverse judgment in Gerry

DuBose’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Jennifer Carey, John Kelly, and their law

firm, see DuBose v. Carey, 204 Fed. Appx. 579 (8th Cir. Nov. 9, 2006) (unpublished

per curiam), DuBose filed a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60(b), restating theories he had advanced earlier without success. The district court1
-2-

denied DuBose’s motion, finding it untimely and without merit. He appeals, and,

following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Middleton v.

McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
#### § 97.14 How will grant awards be made?

The Secretary, or his designee, will award a consolidated grant to each insular area that applies for a consolidated grant and meets the requirements of this part and of the statutes and regulations applicable to the programs under whose authority the consolidated grant funds will be expended. As long as the amount requested does not exceed the amount for which the insular area is eligible under the programs that are being consolidated, the amount of the award will equal the amount requested in the application.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>    <C>                                       <C>
       SUBSIDIARY                                STATE/COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
       ----------                                ------------------------------- 

(1)    Bacou USA Safety, Inc.                    Delaware

(2)    Uvex Safety Manufacturing, Inc.           Delaware

(3)    Titmus Optical, Inc.                      Delaware 

(4)    Bacou USA Finance, Inc.                   Minnesota

(5)    Bacou Foreign Sales Corporation           U.S. Virgin Islands

(6)    Howard Leight de Mexico S.A. De C.V.      Tijuana, Baja California

(7)    Howard Leight (Europe), Ltd.              London, England

</TABLE>
# KANSA S

DEPARTMENTO F TRANSPORTATIO N S[()-I()0920--()I N Mar k Parkinson , Governo r •^i;f['\ \ O rD9bMHhr , Secretor y ';j^p V n r:', ^

Mtp://www.ksdot.or g 2 2 Septembe r

201 0 '- \ 

### 0

Secretar yRa yLaHoo d US . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 NewJerse

yAve , S E Washington , DC 20S9O RE : Smal l Communitie s Airpor t Developmen t Gran t Progra m Dea rSecretar

yLaHood , * . V Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t (MHK) recentl ysubmitte d a gran t applicatio n unde rth e Smal l Communit y Ai rService Developmen t program . I a m writin g t o strongl yurg e yo u t o favorabl yconside rManhattan' s application . Th e fund s awarde d b ythi s gran t woul d promot e th e us e o f th e MHK . Th e us e o f th e airpor t no t onl yguarantee s a stron g regiona l airport , bu t als o reduce s th e highwa ytrave l tim e fo rai rtraveler s fro m th e regio n an d reduce s congestio n Issue s int o the^ansa s Dt ymetropolita n area . Placin g ai r traveler s I n airplane s close rt o thei ror|gt h an d destinatio n reduce s th e risks o f highwa ytravel . Th e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t serve s a n expandin g are a o f th e stat e tha t I s hom e t o man yImportan t Kansa s Institutions . Kansa

s Stat e University , locate d I n Manhattan , I s a n Internationall yrecognize d researc h Institution . Th e Nationa l Bi o an d Agro-defens e Facilit y(NBAF) i s wel l unde rwa yi n Manhattan , Th e airpor t als o serve s th e need s o f th e U.S . Arm yInstallatio n a t Fort Riley . Thi s gran t vt^l l fun d th e Implementatio n o f a strategi cmarketin g plan . Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n has Investe d million s o f dollar s I n Infrastructur e a t MH Ki n recen t years . Thi s gran t wil l effectivel yleverag e tha t publi cinvestmen t b ymakin g ful l us e o f th e fiacilltie s an d service s available , encouragin g privat e Investment . We hop e tha t th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n wil l tak e advantag e o f thi s opportunit yf o buil d o n th e progres s mad e b yth e FA Aa t MHK . ^ .

C . Edwar d Youn g Directo r Cc : Pete rVa n Kuren , Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t

. DIVISIO NO FAVIATION. . C . Edwar dYounf t Directo r Dwigh t D . Eisaihowe r

Stit e Offic e Buildin g 70 0 S.W.Hani9o nStreet ; Topdai,K S 66603^374 5 • (7«5)-2<»-255 3 • F« : (785 ) 296-3833 ' Hearin g Imptired-71 1 * tf^mail: publicinfb^lodotor t * Publi c Acces»a t

Nort hEntranc e o f

Buildin g

• p
User Manual exceeds 10.5 Megbytes, but can be found at:

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf
§ 133.60 Communications. ( a ) *Emergency position indicating radiobeacons (EPIRB).* ( 1 ) Each OSV must carry a category 1 406 MHz satellite EPIRB meeting the requirements of 47 CFR part 80.
( 2 ) When the OSV is underway, the EPIRB must be stowed in its float-free bracket with the controls set for automatic activation and mounted in a manner so that it will float free if the OSV sinks.
( 3 ) Each EPIRB should have the name of the OSV plainly marked or painted on its label, except for EPIRBs in an inflatable liferaft or permanently installed in a survival craft.
( b ) *Distress flares.* Each OSV must— ( 1 ) Carry not less than 12 rocket parachute flares approved under approval series 160.136; and
( 2 ) Stow the flares on or near the OSV's navigating bridge.
( c ) *Onboard communications and alarm systems.* Each OSV must meet the requirements for onboard communications between emergency control stations, muster and embarkation stations, and strategic positions on board, and the emergency alarm system requirements in part J of this chapter, and be supplemented by either a public address system or other suitable means of communication.
( d ) *Emergency position indicating radiobeacon alternative.* OSVs, as an alternative to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, may until February 1, 1999, have a Coast Guard-approved class A EPIRB, if the EPIRB was— ( 1 ) Manufactured after October 1, 1988; and
( 2 ) Installed on the OSV on or before July 5, 1996.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25304, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52191, Sept. 30, 1998]
#### § 122.402 Officers.

Each officer employed upon any vessel subject to the provisions of this subchapter must have his or her license or merchant mariner credential on board and available for examination at all times when the vessel is operating.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11266, Mar. 16, 2009]
#### § 120.100 Intent.

This part contains requirements for the design, construction, installation, and operation of electrical equipment and systems including power sources, lighting, motors, miscellaneous equipment, and safety systems.
21st Century Holding Company
   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
                                   Operations

EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q of 21st  Century
Holding  Company  for the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Edward J. Lawson,  Chief
Executive Officer of 21st Century Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of 21st Century Holding Company.

By:  /s/ Edward J. Lawson
-----------------------------------------
Edward J. Lawson, Chief Executive Officer
- 2333
- 2334
- 2335
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,428,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  341,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    812,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,843,514
<PP&E>                                      12,010,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,038,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,214,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,144
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,809,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,038,981
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,054,960
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,126,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,928,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,916,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,012,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,012,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
#### § 111.50-9 Disconnecting and guarding.

Disconnecting and guarding of overcurrent protective devices must meet Part IV of Article 240 of NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65197, Oct. 31, 2008, as amended by USCG-2023-0075, 88 FR 16362, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1

        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
International Imaging Systems, Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2005, I,
C. Leo Smith, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of International
Imaging Systems, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the three months ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of International
Imaging Systems, Inc.

                                             /s/ C. LEO SMITH
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             C. Leo Smith
                                             Chief Executive and Chief Financial
                                             Officer


         August 16, 2005

                                      -20-
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.258 Crane certification. ( a ) The Coast Guard may accept current certificates issued by approved organizations as evidence of condition and suitability of cranes. The following organizations are approved by the Coast Guard as crane certifying authorities: ( 1 ) American Bureau of Shipping, ABS Plaza, 16855 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060.
( 2 ) International Cargo Gear Bureau, Inc., 321 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036, on the Internet at *http://www.icgb.com .*
( b ) Crane certification must be based upon— ( 1 ) A review of plans submitted under § 107.309; and
( 2 ) The continuing program of tests and inspections in § 107.259.
( c ) Each load test and inspection by the certifying authority must be recorded in the unit's Crane Record Book required in § 109.437.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50730, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58461, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2007-29018, 72 FR 53966, Sept. 21, 2007; USCG-2008-0906, 73 FR 56510, Sept. 29, 2008]
§ 1328.4 National training initiatives on critical and emerging needs. ( a ) Supplemental grant funds for National Training Initiatives (NTIs) on critical and emerging needs may be reserved when each Center described in section 152 of the DD Act has received a grant award of at least $500,000, adjusted for inflation.
( b ) The grants shall be awarded to Centers to pay for the Federal share of the cost of training initiatives related to the unmet needs of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.
( c ) The grants shall be awarded on a competitive basis, and for periods of not more than 5 years.
#### § 127.420 Strength.

Each window or porthole, and its means of attachment to the hull or the deckhouse, must be capable of withstanding the maximum expected load from wind and waves, due to its location on the vessel's and the authorized route of the vessel.
Exhibit 23




                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                    -----------------------------------------


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
    incorporation by reference of our reports dated February 17, 1998,
    included in or incorporated by reference into ThermoQuest Corporation's
    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 1998, into the
    Company's previously filed Registration Statements as follows:
    Registration Statement No. 333-08795 on Form S-8, Registration Statement
    No. 333-08797 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-08799 on Form
    S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-24321 on Form S-3, and Registration
    Statement No. 333-10055 on Form S-3.




                                                     Arthur Andersen LLP




    Boston, Massachusetts
    February 17, 1998
United States District Court

District of Columbia

Republican Party of Louisiana et al.,

Plaintiffs

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Defendant

Civil No. 15-cv-1241 (CRC-SS-TSC)

 THREE-JUDGE COURT

Notice of Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court

Notice is given that all Plaintiffs (Republican Party of Louisiana, Jefferson Parish Republican

Parish Executive Committee, and Orleans Parish Republican Executive Committee) hereby appeal to the United States Supreme Court from this Court’s Memorandum Opinion (Doc. 66, filed

November 7, 2016) and Order (Doc. 67, filed November 7, 2016), denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for

Summary Judgment (Doc. 33) and granting Defendant Federal Election Commission’s Motion

for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41). Direct appeal is taken pursuant to § 403(a)(3) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81, 113-14, which provides

for appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court from such “final decision(s).” (See Verified Complaint for

Declaratory and Injunctive Relief at 2, ¶ 3 (Doc. 1) (text of BCRA § 403).)

Dated: November 11, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James Bopp, Jr. 

James Bopp, Jr., Bar #CO 0041

jboppjr@aol.com

Richard E. Coleson

rcoleson@bopplaw.com

Corrine L. Purvis

cpurvis@bopplaw.com

THE BOPP LAW FIRM, PC

1 South Sixth Street

Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510

812/232-2434 telephone

812/235-3685 facsimile

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC-SS-TSC Document 68 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I certify that on November 11, 2016, I served the foregoing on defendant Federal Election

Commission by First Class Mail and email on the following counsel of record, who will also be

served by ECF when this document is added to the ECF system:

Charles Kitcher, ckitcher@fec.gov

Gregory John Mueller, gmueller@fec.gov

Harry Jacobs Summers, hsummers@fec.gov

Kevin Deeley, kdeeley@fec.gov

Seth E. Nesin, snesin@fec.gov

Counsel for Defendant

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20463

202/694-1650.

/s/ James Bopp, Jr. 

James Bopp, Jr. 

Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC-SS-TSC Document 68 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 2