alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 205 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 205

              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

Mr. Thornberry (for himself, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. 
   Mack, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Boustany, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Brown of South 
  Carolina, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. 
   Westmoreland, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Jones, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. 
   Sessions, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Paul, and Mr. Kingston) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to estates of decedents dying, gifts made, and generation-skipping 
transfers made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Stephen W. Collins, as Substituted Trustee under the Will of Stacy B. Collins, Deceased. Mary D. Frederick et al., Appellants: John Murray, Respondent.

*Matter of Gollins,*131 App. Div. 834, affirmed.

(Submitted October 11, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April *53423, 1909, which reversed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court construing the will of Stacy B. Collins, deceased.

*W. H. Wood*for appellants.

*Morris Ilillguit*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Houghton, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FOR PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,727
<PP&E>                                           2,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,472
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,287
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,022
<CGS>                                           85,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (869)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,716
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,716
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1866 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1866

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
          the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

      Mr. Paul (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Clay, Mr. Frank of 
 Massachusetts, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. McClintock, Mr. George 
  Miller of California, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Stark, and Ms. Woolsey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
          the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINITION OF MARIHUANA.

    Paragraph (16) of section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 802(16)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(16)'' at the beginning and inserting 
        ``(16)(A)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) The term `marihuana' does not include industrial hemp. As 
used in the preceding sentence, the term `industrial hemp' means the 
plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or 
not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not 
exceed 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.''.

SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION TO BE MADE BY STATES.

    Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Industrial Hemp Determination To Be Made by States.--In any 
criminal action, civil action, or administrative proceeding, a State 
regulating the growing and processing of industrial hemp under State 
law shall have exclusive authority to determine whether any such plant 
meets the concentration limitation set forth in subparagraph (B) of 
paragraph (16) of section 102 and such determination shall be 
conclusive and binding.''.
                                 <all>
```
Attendees for NAM:

Br yan L. Brendle, NAM Steven J. Arita

- Chevron Roger Martell

- Sidley

Austin LL P Attendees for EPA : Janet McCabe, OAR Gautam Srinivasan, OGC Steve Page, OAR Rosalina Rodriguez, OAR Summary

Officials from EPA met with representatives of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) on March 10, 2010 to discuss EPA’s ongoing reconsideration of the 2008 ozone NAAQS rulemaking. NAM had requested the meeting. NAM representative s began by noting that NAM, along with other groups, would soon be s e nd ing a written request that EPA extend the comment period on the Agency ’s proposed rule regarding the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The groups will likely ask for an additional 60 day s to provide comments. The comment period is set to close on March 22, 2 010. NAM representatives then listed a few of the issues that the group will discuss in greater detail in its written comments. The issues were

1) The timing and process of EPA’s reconsideration 2) Implementation of a potentially tighter standard 3) Implications as the ozone standard approaches background levels On the last issue, EPA requested that NAM submit any information in its possession regarding background ozone levels. The discussion lasted 20 minutes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31, 2000
FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,734
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,892
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         38,303
<ALLOWANCE>                                        574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,697
<DEPOSITS>                                      57,157
<SHORT-TERM>                                       174
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                299
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,193
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  63,697
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    960
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  219
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     3
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,182
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 404
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 407
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              775
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      127
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    187
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         187
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       156
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.75
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       274
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   508
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       84
<RECOVERIES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  574
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               574
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            574


</TABLE>
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

VALENTINA SERRA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 

v. 

 

 

MIDLAND CREDIT 

MANAGEMENT, INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

 / 

Case No. 14-cv-14063 

 Honorable Gershwin A. Drain 

 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Parties hereto having consented to the entry of this Order, as evidenced by the 

signatures of their counsel below and the Court being otherwise fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled cause be dismissed in its entirety 

with prejudice. 

This Order resolves the last pending claim and closes the captioned case. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 17, 2014 

 _/s/ Gershwin A. Drain_________ 

 Hon. Gershwin A. Drain 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-14063-GAD-RSW ECF No. 8 filed 12/17/14 PageID.29 Page 1 of 3
 -2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and any unrepresented parties via the Court=s ECF System to their respective email or First Class 

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on December 17, 2014. 

s/Felicia M. Moses for Tanya Bankston 

TANYA BANKSTON 

Case Manager 

 

Case 2:14-cv-14063-GAD-RSW ECF No. 8 filed 12/17/14 PageID.30 Page 2 of 3
 -3-

Case 2:14-cv-14063-GAD-RSW ECF No. 8 filed 12/17/14 PageID.31 Page 3 of 3
# Senate Floor Activity - Thursday, February 27, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Thursday, February 27)

S. 1086

S. 1982

 45

 46

 S.Amdt. 2747

 S.Amdt. 2766

 S.Amdt. 2767

 S.Amdt. 2768

 S.Amdt. 2769

S.Res. 366

S.Res. 367

S.Res. 368

## Executive Business (Thursday, February 27)

PN1079

 47

PN1106

PN1190

PN1191

PN1196

PN1199

PN1241

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
- 3696
- 3697
- 3698
- 3699
- 3700
- 3701
- 3702
- 3703
- 3704
- 3705
#### Daniel J. Noyes, *as Executor, etc., of*Mary R. Bailey, *Respondent, v.*Lewis H. Bailey, *as Executor, etc., of*Benjamin Bailey, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.;

Daniels, J., taking no part.
# C_2008219EN.01002901.xml

| 28.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/29

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by Italy of the public service obligation in respect of the scheduled air services on the following routes: Trapani-Rome and vice versa, Trapani-Cagliari and vice versa, Trapani-Bari and vice versa, and Trapani-Milan and vice versa

vice versa

vice versa

vice versa

vice versa

(2008/C 219/19)

Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, the Italian Government has decided to amend the public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services on the routes Trapani-Rome and vice versa, Trapani-Cagliari and vice versa, Trapani-Bari and vice versa, and Trapani-Milan and vice versa, as published in the OJ C 150, 28.6.2006, OJ C 141, 26.6.2007 and OJ C 121, 17.5.2008.

vice versa

vice versa

vice versa

vice versa

The public service obligations in respect of the route Trapani-Cagliari and vice versa are repealed, and point 1 of the notice published in the OJ C 150, 28.6.2006 is amended as follows:

vice versa

Routes concerned:

| | Trapani-Rome and vice versa, |
| --- | --- |

Trapani-Rome and vice versa,

vice versa

| | Trapani-Bari and vice versa, |
| --- | --- |

Trapani-Bari and vice versa,

vice versa

| | Trapani-Rome and vice versa. |
| --- | --- |

Trapani-Rome and vice versa.

vice versa

For Rome and Milan, the airports of Rome Fiumicino and Milano Linate are meant respectively.

---
§ 129.550 Power for cooking and heating. ( a ) Equipment for cooking and heating must be suitable for marine use. Equipment designed and installed to comply with ABYC Standards A-3 and A-7 or Chapter 6 of NFPA 302 meets this requirement.
( b ) The use of gasoline for cooking, heating, or lighting is prohibited.
( c ) The use of liquefied petroleum gas for cooking, heating, or other purposes must comply with subpart 58.16 of this chapter.
( d ) Each electric space-heater must be provided with a thermal cut-out to prevent overheating.
( e ) Each element of an electric space-heater must be enclosed, and the case or jacket of the element made of a corrosion-resistant material.
( f ) Each electrical connection for a cooking appliance must be drip-proof.
#### James Gillies and others, *Appellants, v.*Larry Lewis and William H. Carter, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Dwight, J.
U.S. Department 

of Transp.ortatlon 

Office of the $eoretery 

of Transportation 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

November 20, 2012 

1200 New Jersey A'ilent~e, SE 

W;;~shington, DC 20$90 
2 

has interpreted movable 

an armrest on an seat emnpleteJ~ moves or folds out 

""'~'lu<:t"'"' remains an upright po~ancm to permit a with a 

mobility impainnent to safely make an unobstructed (with a;:,~·to;.,~u'-"' 

personnel if the physical ability such asststaLncc~) 

to his or her aircraft seat 

The Department has Asiana's videos for the first class seats in its Boeing 777-

200ER aircraft. which demonstl'at.e both a carrier-assisted and a self-assisted transfer of a 

a mobility impairment from an aisle or boarding wheelchair to Asiana's 

seat utilizing a 82.8 seat pitch. These videos demonstrate that do not 

to be lifted over the aisle armt'est. Based on the infortnation provided tbr the 

seats the Depattment is equiv!llent 

alternative determination"'"'"''"""" 1 with the conditions: 

( l) is limited to the first class seats 

aircraft With the COnfiguratiOn 8Jld dimensiOnS nrr>Vttlt>£1 

2. equivalent determination request 

Department's prior approval for seat configuration and/or seat 

dimension changes to be made on any aircraft that is subject tt'> this approvaL If 

implements seat configttration and/or seat dimension changes without prior 

approval of the Department it risks being in violation of section 382.61; 

must provide, or ensure the provision training to its employees 

as well as the employees and conu·actors of any other entity that will 

nPr'R£Hl" with a mobility inl}Ydirtnent to or from the first class 

The must e.nsu.rc training to 

how to pmperly transfer a from first 

seats. Such training must also cover. at use of all itenlS 

ne1~oc:~o to a to and tl·mn 

(B) the number 

to properly the first use 

(D) how to transfer a seats in a 

and dignified manner~ and 

must also: provide, or ensw·e the provision annual re11·esher training; 

(B) retain tbr three individuals' training records demm1strating that aU persons 

required to initial and refresher training done S<)~ and (C) within 30 

each calendar quarter, for a period of three the Entbrcen1ent 

Office with all complaints, to and 

from seats in the covered 

Por if 80 percent ofthe aisle seats in which paSc<;engers with impairment~ may sit 

are in coach. and 20 percent are in first then 80 pel'cent ofthe movable aisle armrests must be in coath, 

with 20 percent in first class, 
3 

If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Amna Arshad or Michael 

Hallock, of my staff, at (202) 366-9342. 

Sincerely, 

Livau Chapman,Jr, 

Chief, Aviation Civil Rights 

Compliance Branch
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.336 Special cargo pump or pumproom requirements. ( a ) When Table 1 refers to this section: ( 1 ) The cargo pump must be an intank cargo pump;
( 2 ) The cargo pumproom must be on or above the weatherdeck; or
( 3 ) The cargo pumproom must have the specific approval of the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( b ) For a cargo pumproom described in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) the tankship must: ( 1 ) Have a low pressure breathing quality air supply system for use with the breathing apparatus in the pumproom; or
( 2 ) Meet any requirements specified by the Commandant (CG-522).
( c ) A low pressure air supply system described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must: ( 1 ) Run from fixed air bottles to the pumproom;
( 2 ) Have an air compressor to recharge the fixed air bottles;
( 3 ) have hose connections in the pumproom suitable for use with the breathing apparatus required in § 153.214(b)(1); and
( 4 ) have the air capacity to enable two men to work in the pumproom for at least one hour each without using the cartridges for the breathing apparatus required in § 153.214(b)(1).
[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21208, May 17, 1982, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4781, Feb. 3, 1983]
# C_2008110EN.01002101.xml

| 1.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/21

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding state aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to state aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2008/C 110/09)

Aid No: XA 7002/08

Member State: Italy

Region: Regione autonoma Valle d'Aosta

Title of aid scheme: Aiuti alle aziende operanti nel settore della trasformazione e commercializzazione dei prodotti agricoli

Legal basis: Art. 56 del titolo III (Disciplina degli interventi regionali in materia di agricoltura e di sviluppo rurale. Modificazioni alle leggi regionali 16 novembre 1999, n. 36, e 28 aprile 2003, n. 18) della legge regionale 12 dicembre 2007, n. 32 «Disposizioni per la formazione del bilancio annuale e pluriennale della Regione autonoma Valle d'Aosta (Legge finanziaria per gli anni 2008/2010). Modificazioni di leggi regionali.»

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme: EUR 0,5 million

Maximum aid intensity: 40 % of eligible costs for investments in tangible and intangible fixed assets, including associated consultancy costs.

Where the aid is granted as an interest subsidy or in the form of a subsidised loan, the gross grant equivalent is calculated using the appropriate IT programme, which applies the reference rate as periodically determined by the Commission

Date of implementation: after a period of 20 working days following the date on which the Commission receives the summary

Duration of aid scheme: under the scheme, aid may be granted until 31 December 2013 and for six months thereafter

Objective of aid: to assist small and medium-sized enterprises engaged in the processing and marketing of agricultural products, i.e. promote rational business management by reducing production costs, enhancing production and quality and making improvements to the natural environment and to the hygiene and welfare conditions of the animals.

Reference to Community legislation: Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

Sector(s) concerned: Small and medium-sized enterprises engaged in the processing and marketing of agricultural products

Name and address of the granting authority:

Internet address: http://www.regione.vda.it/gestione/sezioni_web/allegato.asp?pk_allegato=1247

Saint-Christophe

Coordinator, Agriculture Department

Coordinator, Agriculture Department

Emanuele DUPONT

DUPONT

---