# EUR-Lex - 52008PC0411 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52008PC0411

**Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 of 19 December 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Algeria, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 /* COM/2008/0411 final */ **

*

*

[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels, 2.7.2008

COM(2008) 411 final

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 of 19 December 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Algeria, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96

(presented by the Commission)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1) Context of the proposal |

110 | Grounds for and objectives of the proposal This proposal concerns the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96[1] on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘the basic Regulation’) in the proceeding concerning imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia. |

120 | General context This proposal is made in the context of the implementation of the basic Regulation and is the result of an investigation which was carried out in line with the substantive and procedural requirements laid out in the basic Regulation. |

139 | Existing provisions in the area of the proposal Council Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000[2], imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia into the Community. |

141 | Consistency with other policies and objectives of the Union Not applicable. |

2) Consultation of interested parties and impact assessment |

Consultation of interested parties |

219 | The applicant and the Community industry have been informed of the findings of the examination and have had the opportunity to submit their comments. |

Collection and use of expertise |

229 | There was no need for external expertise. |

230 | Impact assessment This proposal is the result of the implementation of the basic Regulation. The basic Regulation does not make provision for a general impact assessment but contains an exhaustive list of conditions that have to be assessed. |

3) Legal elements of the proposal |

305 | Summary of the proposed action By Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000[3], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia. Further to a request lodged by two exporting producers from Russia, an interim review limited to dumping was initiated. The investigation showed that dumping took place during the investigation period. The level of the dumping found was higher than the injury elimination level which forms the basis of the current measures in force. Therefore, the measures were maintained at their level. The regulation terminating the review included a clause enabling the interested parties to submit an undertaking offer within 10 calendar days from the entry into force of this regulation. Such undertaking offer was submitted in due time. It stipulates that a certain quantity, representing around 10% of the total Community consumption of the product concerned, can be exported to the EC without paying the applicable anti-dumping duty if a certain indexed minimum import price is respected. This undertaking offer was accepted. It is therefore proposed that the Council adopt the attached proposal for a Regulation, which should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. |

310 | Legal basis Council Regulation (EC) No 384/1996 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community ("the basic Regulation")[4]. |

329 | Subsidiarity principle The proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Community. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply. |

Proportionality principle The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reason(s). |

331 | Council Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000 imposing the definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of UAN originating in Russia last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1675/2003 leaves no scope for national decision. |

332 | Indication of how financial and administrative burden falling upon the Community, national governments, regional and local authorities, economic operators and citizens is minimized and proportionate to the objective of the proposal is not applicable. |

Choice of instruments |

341 | Proposed instruments: regulation. |

342 | Other means would not be adequate for the following reason(s). The above-mentioned basic regulation does not foresee alternative options. |

4) Budgetary implication |

409 | The proposal has no implication for the Community budget. |

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 of 19 December 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Algeria, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community[5] ('the basic Regulation'), and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A. PROCEDURE

(1) By Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000[6], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN) originating, inter alia, in Russia. Following an expiry review initiated in September 2005, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006[7], renewed for five years these measures at their current level.

(2) On 19 December 2006, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union[8], the initiation of a partial interim review concerning imports into the Community of UAN originating, inter alia, in Russia upon the request of Open Joint Stock Company Novomoskovskiy Azot and Open Joint Stock Company Nevinnomyssky Azot, two exporting producers from Russia, belonging to the Open Joint Stock Company "Mineral and Chemical Company Eurochem". These two companies, due to their relationship, are treated as one legal entity ("the exporting producer") for the purpose of the present Regulation. The definitive findings and conclusions of the partial interim review are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 238/2008 of 10 March 2008[9] by which the review was terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.

B. UNDERTAKING

(3) During the interim review the exporting producer expressed an interest in offering a price undertaking but failed to submit a duly substantiated offer within the deadline as set out in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation. However as stated in Recitals (57) and (58) of the above mentioned Council Regulation, the Council considered that the exporting producer should exceptionally be allowed to complete its undertaking offer within 10 calendar days from entry into force of that Regulation due to the complexity of several issues, namely (1) the volatility of the price of the product concerned which would require some form of indexation of minimum prices, while at the same time the volatility is not sufficiently explained by the key cost driver; and (2) the particular market situation for the product concerned. Subsequent to the publication of Council Regulation (EC) No 238/2008 and within the deadline as set out in that Regulation the exporting producer submitted an acceptable price undertaking with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.

(4) The Commission by Decision [INSERT][10] accepted the undertaking offer. The Council recognises that the undertaking offer eliminates the injurious effect of dumping and limits to a sufficient degree the risk of circumvention.

(5) To further enable the Commission and the customs authorities to effectively monitor the compliance of the exporting producer with the undertaking, when the request for release for free circulation is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the anti-dumping duty is to be conditional on (i) the presentation of an undertaking invoice, which is a commercial invoice containing at least the elements listed and the declaration stipulated in the Annex; (ii) the fact that imported goods are manufactured, shipped and invoiced directly by the exporting producer to the first independent customer in the Community; and (iii) the fact that the goods declared and presented to customs correspond precisely to the description on the undertaking invoice. Where the above conditions are not met the appropriate anti-dumping duty shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation.

(6) Whenever the Commission withdraws, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation, its acceptance of an undertaking following a breach by referring to particular transactions and declares the relevant undertaking invoices as invalid, a customs debt shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation of these transactions.

(7) Importers should be aware that a customs debt may be incurred, as a normal trade risk, at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation as described in recitals (5) and (6) even if an undertaking offered by the manufacturer from whom they were buying, directly or indirectly, had been accepted by the Commission.

(8) Pursuant to Article 14(7) of the basic Regulation, customs authorities should inform the Commission immediately whenever indications of a violation of the undertaking are found.

(9) For the reasons stated in the Commission Decision, the undertaking offered by the exporting producer is therefore considered acceptable by the Commission and the exporting producer concerned has been informed of the essential facts, considerations and obligations upon which acceptance is based.

(10) In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking or in case of withdrawal of acceptance of the undertaking by the Commission the anti-dumping duty which has been imposed by the Council in accordance with Article 9(4) shall automatically apply by means of Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 is hereby amended as follows:

Paragraph 4 in Article 1 shall be replaced by the following paragraph :

"4. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the definitive anti-dumping duty shall not apply to imports released into free circulation in accordance with Article 2 or Article 2a."

The following Article shall be added after Article 2:

" Article 2a

1. Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate for release into free circulation which are invoiced by the company from which an undertaking is accepted by the Commission and whose name is listed in the Commission Decision [2008/[INSERT]/EC], as from time to time amended, shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1, on condition that:

- they are manufactured, shipped and invoiced directly by the said producer to the first independent customer in the Community; and

- such imports are accompanied by an undertaking invoice which is a commercial invoice containing at least the elements and the declaration stipulated in Annex of this Regulation; and

- the goods declared and presented to customs correspond precisely to the description on the undertaking invoice.

2. A customs debt shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation:

- whenever it is established, in respect of imports described in paragraph 1, that one or more of the conditions listed in that paragraph are not fulfilled; or

- when the Commission withdraws its acceptance of the undertaking pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation in a Regulation or Decision which refers to particular transactions and declares the relevant undertaking invoices as invalid."

The Annex shall be replaced by the following Annex:

"ANNEX

Elements to be indicated in the undertaking invoice referred to in Article 2(2) and Article 2a:

1. The TARIC additional code under which the goods on the invoice may be customs cleared at Community borders (as specified in the appropriate Regulation or Decision).

2. The exact description of the goods, including:

— CN code,

— The nitrogen (‘N’) content of the product (in percentages),

— quantity (to be given in tonnes).

3. The description of the terms of the sale, including:

— price per tonne,

— the applicable payment terms,

— the applicable delivery terms,

— total discounts and rebates.

4. The name of the unrelated importer to which the invoice is issued directly by the company.

5. The name of the official of the company that has issued the undertaking invoice and the following signed declaration:

‘I, the undersigned, certify that the sale for direct export to the European Community of the goods covered by this invoice is being made within the scope and under the terms of the undertaking offered by [company], and accepted by the European Commission through Regulation (EC) No 617/2000 or Decision 2008/xxxx/EC (as appropriate). I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council

The President

[...]

[1] OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

[2] OJ L 238, 22.9.2000, p. 15. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1675/2003 (OJ L 238, 25.9.2003, p. 4).

[3] OJ L 238, 22.9.2000, p. 15. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1675/2003 (OJ L 238, 25.9.2003, p. 4).

[4] OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

[5] OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p.1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p.17)

[6] OJ L 238, 22.9.2000, p. 15.

[7] OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 26.

[8] OJ C 311, 19.12.2006, p. 51.

[9] OJ L 75, 18.03.2008. p. 14

[10] INSERT REFERENCE