## EXHIBIT 

# jd~lEJ1~~ L-1T'{ OF 

# s}\ }\J

# 1-1;\\ CALIFORNIA I.

## ,4..(t17~7 

### "TO et4tt 4-t1J - ~CVl>t~,'( 

## :?•.

# 4 F-6or";:, 

### to 'j)

### A'le. -R({jjI.I/J 

## 3.. ~ u.) lU \)

### e::J (l.l...<)

# p., - 

# .J S, 1981 ~j)OIJH) e

.-.- p.,-:'''IIJV./ ;J..O

### \5- ell/ /.JiS-r 

# 4, l\

Mol rJ'" - .vl1"#f)/!---.;;;;;.J 

### ,kT!!:::E' 

# '5" W l+i)' Ll- ~~'{

_ 6tJtJ,()f,t.. •• I\(I.,tJ,.:. 'DtMJOS - 

### ;:~o 

### ~"'N'i-

~ .. £fJll \ {2{)M.~kt- ""'" evc"l(~ f/.-~;o';)'1>t(, ~~. ()j-'tjC~~()I-··~'HECjTY .. \'l·T(jE~<El C1TY HALL :-;;I::.~~:li,:j

!·:r.Robert Cara~gi California Aviation, Inc. 2501 hiroort AveCUE Santa ~o~ica, California 

## I. W\!A." l ~ 

### r!- 

## -r1+:z.-'1

~ \-c.'i- !U£.c:u."!lil J &'1\1 U"U .•C> ~'It- ftild'..J5f!J 

### c..~ - Dear Mr. Carangi:

This letter ~ill outline the curren~ scope of negoti2ticrJ Dety;een the City of S2:nt.2. !·:or;ica ana vou r cornparry , Your company is one of the shareholders in Cloverleaf hviation. Cloverleaf Aviation has a lease of approximately ~i): acres on the south side of the ru~~ay at Santa Monica .\irpcrt. The terrrl of the Lease is to the yea.!~ 1996
w The ~i~ht~ and obligations of thE parties unaei 

### the lease are the cu~-~ent subject of litiga~icnw

30th you 2nd ~he City of Santa ~onica are interested in resolving the current litigation. In order to facilitate planE to develc; ~~e south side of the rU~~2Y, the City is desirous of terrrinating the Cloverleaf Avi~tion lEase.

The City cu~rently owns approximately 27 acres of land on the no~th side of the run~a)'. This land is available for 2 irr.ort uscs , corr.no rc iaI development! resider.tial de ve ioprne t , ~n6 ()penspace 2n~ recreation uses.

In order to resolve all ou~StanGlns disputes! we have had discussions about granting you developnlent rights pursuant to lone-term arouno le2ses for 2 substantial Dortion of the 27 acre ~ite. -The development rigl1ts would in~lude certain airport-related ~ses and con:mercial offi·ce buildings. In exc~an e for the City giving you ~he right to engage in such devQ opm~nt, ~·C~ ~ol]16 exec~t~ the necessary documents to rescin the Clo\Terleaf Avj2~ion l~ase.r'dge 2

~~r. Robert Carangi ?,ugust 5, 1981

At this time, the City does not desire to proceed beyond the discussion stage unless you join efforts with a responsible developer. Once you have secured a responsible develocer to work with you, the City Council desires that a specific 2greement be negotiated for its approval 25 soon as pcssible. Sincerely yours,



# ~Kr:~~l ':" kl"~'E-:R:O--- U~'---,I" L·~. l_ ....., Ci -::Y'Attorney ,,~).::.: :r'-~ 

## ..:..,-'.~~ .. 

# - -- .. .. \v)~ .



# .~ 

# .

. 

### ~ 

## FEB 9 1989 

# Nr. Hank Dittmar Santa Nonica !·!unicipal Airport 3223 Donald Douglas Loop-South Santa Monica. California 9040

# t Dear Mr. Dittmar:

.This is 

# in reference to 

# your letter dated 

# January 31. 1989 

# regarding devel 

# opeent of the 37.5 Ac 

# residual land parcel. You posed several questions on different 

# issues and we offer 

# the following COG1ments: Use of Airport Perimeter Road by 

# Project Traffic. As we previously stated. the perimeter road 

# was bui1t 

# l'/ithFederal funds for the purpose of providing access by 

# airport service and maintenance vehicles between the north and south sides of the airport. We consider 

# this road 

## necessary to maintain safety 

# and security and 

# to prevent interference with air traffic operations. 

# We will not concur with 

# converting the perimeter road to public use. \~/Shortening of Runway. The 1984 

# agreement requires 

# the City to
~ maintain a 5000' 

# runway and we would object to any proposal to shorten it. 

# Tunnel under the Airport. Due to the significant 

# impact to alr traffic 

# operations. we would object to an 8-12 week airport closure 

# for the purpose of constructing a tunnel. Other than the specified residual land. the Agreement requires 

# thai the 

# balance of 

# airport property be dedicated for airport use and 

# we would object to any 

# change. Residential Use of Airport Residual Land. Development of residential uses on the residual lands is contrary to the Agreei~nt. as the 

# City is required to maintain 6 

# noise mitigation program to reduce noise impacts and to develop the residual land for uses comsat tb

# le \-litll 

# airport operations. ~!econsider residential use on the residual lands as incompatible with airport operations. I 

# trust the above satisfies you inquiry. Sincerely. EXHIBIT



# Iltd- 8- Origiral S1jned By Rober-t C. 8iocm 

# Robert 

# C. 8100m 

# Supervisor. Standards Section FAA Fcrm 1360.14

## AlitPU

## 621:BLOO~l: Xl

## 029: 1

## k:2/9/ ~mg\LB2l~ FeBE9X) PG. 

## 12

~ CONCURAE:I\;CE::: ATG. SYMBOL 

## l.. Z-( INITIALS/aIC. 

# ;213 D~9 ATG. SYMBOL 

# L,/O 'N'~'G \ . DATE ,\"; .6, 

# A~i "." , ; I RTG.SVM801.. 

# b 20



## - INITIALS/SIC 

# t~ DATE 

## 'r. 

# fl{fJ#1 ATG. SYMBOL 

# (;,Il IN'TIALS/SIG.\ 

### IVU1 v ,

\ 

# 02)

# r!?'i RTCl. SYMBOf .' INITIALSISIG. DATE
RTG. SYMBOL. INITIALSISIG. DATE
RTO. SYMBOL
tN1TtALS/SIG. DATE RTG. SYMBOL INITIALS/SIC. DATE

lr U.S.G.P.O.; 1985 - 572·5:?O