alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 131.990 Maneuvering characteristics. This section applies to OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned). ( a ) The following maneuvering information must be prominently displayed in the pilothouse on a fact sheet: ( 1 ) For full and half speed, a turning circle diagram to port and starboard that shows the time and the distance of advance and transfer required to alter the course 90 degrees with maximum rudder angle and constant power settings.
( 2 ) The time and distance to stop the vessel from full and half speed while maintaining approximately the initial heading with minimum application of rudder.
( 3 ) For each vessel with a fixed propeller, a table of shaft revolutions per minute for a representative range of speeds.
( 4 ) For each vessel with a controllable pitch propeller, a table of control settings or a representative range of speeds.
( 5 ) For each vessel that is fitted with an auxiliary device to assist in maneuvering, such as a bow thruster, a table of vessel speeds at which the auxiliary device is effective in maneuvering the vessel.
( b ) The maneuvering information must be provided in the normal load and normal light condition with normal trim for a particular condition of loading, assuming the following: ( 1 ) Calm weather—wind 10 knots or less, calm sea.
( 2 ) No current.
( 3 ) Deep water conditions—water depth twice the vessel's draft or more.
( 4 ) Clean hull.
( c ) At the bottom of the fact sheet, the following statement must appear: ( 1 ) Warning, the response of the [NAME OF THE VESSEL] may be different from those listed above if any of the following conditions, upon which the maneuvering information is based, are varied: ( i ) Calm weather—wind 10 knots or less, calm sea.
( ii ) No current.
( iii ) Deep water conditions—water depth twice the vessel's draft or more.
( iv ) Clean hull.
( v ) Intermediate drafts or unusual trim.
( d ) The information on the fact sheet must be— ( 1 ) Verified 6 months after the vessel is placed into service; or
( 2 ) Modified 6 months after the vessel is placed into service and verified within 3 months thereafter.
( e ) The information that appears on the fact sheet may be obtained from— ( 1 ) Trial trip observations;
( 2 ) Model tests;
( 3 ) Analytical calculations;
( 4 ) Simulations;
( 5 ) Information established from another vessel of similar hull form, power, rudder and propeller; or
( 6 ) Any combination of the above.
( f ) The accuracy of the information on the fact sheet must be at a level comparable with that attainable by ordinary shipboard navigation equipment.
( g ) The requirements for information for fact sheets for specialized craft, such as semi-submersibles and other vessels of unusual design, will be specified on a case-by-case basis.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48937, Aug. 18, 2014]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

ROBERT C. MCCHESNEY, in his official 

capacity as Treasurer of Bart McLeay 

for U.S. Senate, Inc.; and BART 

MCLEAY FOR U.S. SENATE, INC.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MATTHEW S. PETERSON, in his official 

capacity as Chair of the Federal 

Election Commission; FEDERAL 

ELECTION COMMISSION; and UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

8:16CV168

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum and Order:

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Federal Election Commission 

and Matthew S. Peterson, ECF No. 21, is granted;

2. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants Federal Election Commission and 

Matthew S. Peterson, are dismissed, with prejudice;

3. Plaintiffs’ Notice of Dismissal, ECF No. 28, is approved and Defendant 

United States of America is dismissed as a party defendant;

4. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant United States of America, ECF 

No. 25, is denied as moot; and

5. This Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case for statistical 

purposes.

Dated this 22nd day of December, 2016

8:16-cv-00168-LSC-FG3 Doc # 35 Filed: 12/22/16 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 301
2

BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp

Chief United States District Judge

8:16-cv-00168-LSC-FG3 Doc # 35 Filed: 12/22/16 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 302
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY. OCTOBER 4, 2012 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of September 20, 2012 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-25: American Future Fund, American Future Fund 

Political Action, Mr. David Mcintosh and David Mcintosh for Indiana 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-33: Pennsylvania Democratic Party 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Minnesota DemocraticFarmer-Labor Party (A09-08) 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Righmarch.com PAC, Inc. 

(A09-25) 

Candidate and Committee Viewer Demonstration 

Management and Administrative Matters 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Signed: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission 

Submitted: September 27, 2012 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220
#### JOHN C. BACKERT, RESPONDENT, v. MAX LEUCHTER, APPELLANT.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided May 8, 1929.

Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.

Eor the respondent, *David Horuvitz (Leroy W. Loder,*on the brief).

Eor the appellant, *M. Joseph Greenblait.*

Pee Cubiam.

This ease comes up on appeal from the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas wherein the plaintiff below brought suit on several promissory notes, claiming to be a *bona fide*holder by endorsement and transfer for value in duo course before maturity. The defendant below by his answer charged that while on their face the notes showed another payee and the endorsement by that payee to the plaintiff, nevertheless, the notes had been given in payment of a certain linotype machine, the property .of the plaintiff, and that the payee named in the notes was in fact merely the agent of the plaintiff, that the defendant’s notes made to the payee were received by the latter as such agent and by him endorsed over to the plaintiff who had obligated himself by certain representations and warranties as to the condition of the machine; that the *498machine was not as represented and was in fact worthless and that the defendant, therefore, was not indebted on the notes to the plaintiff. The defendant added a counter-claim.

At the trial the judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The judgment thereon was appealed from chiefly upon the ground that the testimony set up disputed questions of fact, which it was the exclusive province of the jury to determine.

There is testimony to the effect that the linotype machine was the property of the plaintiff and that the payee named in the notes had simply acted as a broker- in selling the machine for him to the defendant; that the plaintiff before delivery of the notes had represented to defendant that the machine was as specified, rebuilt, complete and in first class condition; that the notes were delivered by defendant to plaintiff in payment though made payable to the broker; that the machine was not as represented, and that there was a part failure of consideration.

We are of the opinion that there was sufficient dispute in the evidence to take the case to the jury. The judgment, therefore, is reversed.
|   | (i) | the accompanying report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended July 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                    |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Dated: October 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Michael L. Krall                    |   |
|                    |   | Michael L. KrallChief Executive Officer |
|                    |   |                                    |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1854 Reference Change Senate (RCS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1854

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                            January 20, 2010

  Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to modify an 
  environmental infrastructure project for Big Bear Lake, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIG BEAR LAKE, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(84) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(121 Stat. 1259) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(84) Big bear lake, california.--$9,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure improvements for Big Bear Lake, 
        California.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 129.440 Emergency lighting. ( a ) A vessel of less than 100 gross tons must have adequate emergency lighting fitted along the line of escape to the main deck from accommodations and working (machinery) spaces below the main deck.
( b ) The emergency lighting required by paragraph (a) of this section must automatically actuate upon failure of the main lighting. Unless a vessel is equipped with a single source of power for emergency lighting, it must have individual battery-powered lighting that is— ( 1 ) Automatically actuated upon loss of normal power;
( 2 ) Not readily portable;
( 3 ) Connected to an automatic battery-charger; and
( 4 ) Of enough capacity for 6 hours of continuous operation.
#### § 141.100 Purpose.

This part contains requirements for lifesaving equipment, arrangements, systems, and procedures on towing vessels.
When using Coreactant F, use the amount shown in the Typical Properties section as a guide. The

optimum level of coreactant should be determined experimentally for each particular end use. Coating with

coreactant is handled in the same manner as coatin g without coreactant. Curing begins after solvent removal and continues slowly at room temperature. Approximately 7

- 14 days are needed to complete the cure at room temperature, but a post cure at elevated temperatures can reduce this time.

Pot Life

Do n ot mix more Adcote 3840D resin and coreactant that will be needed in 8 hours. Any mixed solution that is left over should be stored in tightly closed containers and used within 3 days. When reusing, we recommend combining the old mixed solution with the newly mixed solution at a ratio of 25% old/75% new. Mix thoroughly.

Safety Precautions

 Store in cool, dry, well ventilated area.

 Follow good manufacturing and handling practices.

 Wash thoroughly after handling. Wash contaminated goggles, faceshield, and gloves. Professionally launder contaminated clothing before re

- use.

 ATTENTION! Container can be hazardous when empty. Follow label warnings even after container is empty. Do not reuse empty container without professionally cleaning it first.

 Refer to Material Safety Data Sheet for more information.



### ______________________________________________________________________ ADCO TE is a registered trademark of Rohm and Haas Company

These suggestions and data are based on information we believe to be reliable. They are offered in good faith, but without guarantee, as conditions and method of use of our products are beyond o ur control. We recommend that the prospective user determine the suitability of our materials and suggestions before adopting them on a commercial scale.

Suggestions for uses of our products or the inclusion of descriptive material from patents and the c itation of specific patents in this publication should not be understood as recommending the use of our products in violation of any patent or as permission or l icense to use any patents of the Rohm and Haas Company.

Visit us at http://www.rohmhaas.com/adhesivesSealants Address: Midwest Technical Center, 2531 Technology Drive, Suite 301, Elgin, IL 60123

Phone: 847

- 649

- 3800

Adcote 3840D Nov

- 12 2
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.208 Ballast equipment. ( a ) Except for the arrangement described in paragraph (b) of this section no piping that serves a dedicated ballast tank that is adjacent to a cargo tank may enter an engine room or accommodation space.
( b ) Piping used only to fill a dedicated ballast tank adjacent to a cargo tank may enter an engine room or accommodation space if the piping has a valve or valving arrangement: ( 1 ) Within the part of the tankship where a containment system may be located under § 153.234;
( 2 ) That allows liquid to flow only towards that ballast tank (such as a check valve); and
( 3 ) That enables a person to shut off the fill line from the weatherdeck (such as a stop valve).
( c ) Except as prescribed in paragraph (d) of this section, pumps, piping, vent lines, overflow tubes and sounding tubes serving dedicated ballast tanks must not be located within a cargo containment system.
( d ) Each vent line, overflow tube and sounding tube that serves a dedicated ballast tank and that is located within a cargo containment system must meet § 32.60-10(e)(2) of this chapter.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21207, May 17, 1982]
§ 137.202 Documenting compliance for the TSMS option. The owner or managing operator of a towing vessel that chooses the TSMS option for a towing vessel must document compliance with this subpart as follows: ( a ) Prior to obtaining the vessel's initial COI, the owner or managing operator must provide a report to the Coast Guard of a survey as described in § 137.215 that demonstrates that the vessel complies the requirements of this part.
( b ) For the re-issuance of the vessel's COI, the owner or managing operator must: ( 1 ) Provide objective evidence of an external survey program as described in § 137.205; or
( 2 ) Provide objective evidence of an internal survey program as described in § 137.210.
§ 13.405 Proof of service for tankerman-assistant endorsement. Service must be proved by either— ( a ) A letter on company letterhead from the owner, operator, or master of a tankship or self-propelled tank vessel. The letter must specify— ( 1 ) The name of the vessel(s), the applicable dates, and the port(s) or terminal(s);
( 2 ) The classification of cargo (DL or LG) carried while the applicant accumulated the service;
( 3 ) The number of days of deck service the applicant accumulated on the tankship or self-propelled tank vessel; and
( 4 ) That the applicant has demonstrated an understanding of cargo transfer and a sense of responsibility that, in the opinion of the signer, will allow the applicant to safely carry out duties respecting cargo transfer and transfer equipment assigned by the PIC of the transfer without direct supervision by the PIC; or
( b ) Certificates of Discharge from tankships with the appropriate classification of cargo (DL, LG, or both); and a letter on company letterhead from the owner, operator, or master of one of the tankships or self-propelled tank vessels stating that he or she has demonstrated— ( 1 ) An understanding of cargo transfers; and
( 2 ) A sense of responsibility that, in the opinion of the signer, will allow him or her to safely carry out duties respecting cargo and its equipment assigned by the PIC of the transfer without direct supervision by the PIC.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77996, Dec. 24, 2013]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1992

_____________________________

GREGORY DECKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County.

Mark E. Feagle, Judge.

May 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# CE2009247EN.01005001.xml

| 15.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 247/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 247/50

---

Wednesday 9 April 2008Approving the appointment of Mrs Androula Vassiliou as a Member of the Commission

P6_TA(2008)0108

European Parliament decision of 9 April 2008 approving the appointment of Mrs Androula Vassiliou as a Member of the Commission

2009/C 247 E/10

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to Article 214(2), third subparagraph, and Article 215 of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 4 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission (1),

1

having regard to the resignation of Mr Markos Kyprianou as a Member of the Commission, tendered on 28 February 2008,

having regard to the nomination by the Government of the Republic of Cyprus of Mrs Androula Vassiliou for appointment as a Member of the Commission,

having regard to Council Decision 2008/184/EC of 29 February 2008 appointing a new member of the Commission of the European Communities (2),

2

having regard to the hearing of the Commissioner designate before its responsible committee held on 1 April 2008,

having regard to Rule 99 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Approves the appointment of Mrs Androula Vassiliou as a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission’s term of office until 31 October 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the appointment of Mrs Androula Vassiliou as a Member of the Commission for the remainder of the Commission’s term of office until 31 October 2009;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 117 E, 18.5.2006, p. 123.

1

(2)  OJ L 59, 4.3.2008, p. 18.

2

---
PALMER	INTERNATIONAL,	INC.			CONFIDENTIAL Page	1

PROCESS DESCRIPTION OF CNSL MANNICH POLYOL:

The new bio-mannich-polyol derived from renewable cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) would be 

produced at only one manufacturing plant and shipped direct to our customer. Palmer 

International, Incorporated would manufacture the bio-mannich-polyol only at their Skippack, 

PA manufacturing plant. The bio-mannich-polyol is the reaction product of CNSL, 

paraformaldehyde, diethanol amine and diisopropanol amine. The manufacturing plant is trained 

in the use of hazardous chemicals and currently uses paraformaldehyde in bulk quantities. 

REACTION

The Mannich reaction would be run in a steel reactor vessel, agitated internally, ambient 

pressure, heated by closed loop thermal oil boiler and cooled via a secondary loop to a water 

chiller, vented to a thermal oxidizer. The vessel has an outlet to a pump at the lowest point to 

insure maximum discharge and minimize any residue left in the reactor. The reactor is equipped 

with a condenser which is cooled be glycol chiller. The reaction would be run by charging the 

CNSL into the vessel followed by diethanol amine, diisopropanol amine and paraformaldehyde. 

The reactor is vented through a condenser cooled via chilled glycol line and then to a thermal 

oxidizer so that no vapors escape. The materials will be heated to affect reaction.

Once the water of reaction is condensed to the collection tank the batch is sampled for in-process 

testing. The reaction will be stopped by cooling the batch to <130oF using an external cooling 

jacket and internal cooling loop. The finished material will be filtered in line and packaged into 

50 gallon steel drums. Drumming system is fitted with a local trunk line exhaust which is vented 

to the thermal oxidizer.

The vessel will not be washed in between batches of the same product during a campaign. After 

the final batch of a campaign the vessel will be washed by recirculating cleaner through all lines, 

pumps and valves. The reactor is equipped with a cpi spray head to allow recirculated wash 

material to be sprayed over the interior vessel walls. The wash material will be stored and reused 

for the later campaigns. The manufacturing vessel contains a bottom drain to allow full gravity

draining. Vessel would be pumped to dryness via pump below the gravity drain port.
§ 503.11 Reports. ( a ) The Administrative Officer or designee will provide adequate advance notice to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget of any proposal to establish or alter any Commission system of records, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(o).
( b ) If at any time a system of records maintained by the Commission is determined to be exempt from the application of 5 U.S.C. 552a in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k), the number of records contained in such system will be separately listed and reported to the Office of Management and Budget.
§ 131.590 Firefighting equipment. ( a ) The master shall ensure that the vessel's required firefighting equipment is on board in the prescribed location and always ready for use, other than when the equipment is being serviced.
( b ) The master shall, at least once each 12 months, ensure the performance of the tests and inspections of each portable fire extinguisher, semiportable fire extinguisher, and fixed fire-extinguishing system aboard described by Table 132.350 of this subchapter.
( c ) The master shall keep records of these tests and inspections, showing the dates of their performance, the number or other identification of each unit undergoing them, and the name of the person or company conducting them. The records must be made available to the marine inspector upon request and must be kept for the period of validity of the vessel's current Certificate of Inspection.
( d ) The conducting of tests and inspections required by this section does not relieve the master of his or her responsibility to maintain the prescribed firefighting equipment in working order for use at any time when the vessel is under way.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49340, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58284, Sept. 29, 2014]