alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.352 B/3 and 4 m venting system outlets. A B/3 or 4 m venting system outlet must: ( a ) Discharge vertically upwards; and
( b ) Prevent precipitation from entering the vent system.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and  Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 6, 2006



/s/  Jack Abramov

Jack Abramov

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Pauline Schneider

Pauline Schneider

Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Subpart 113.25 of Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 113.25 of part 113 appear by CGD-94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996.

§ 113.25-25 General emergency alarm systems for manned ocean and coastwise barges. A manned ocean or coastwise barge of more than 100 gross tons, if it is one that operates with the crew divided into watches for steering the vessel, must have an emergency alarm signal installation. The system must: ( a ) Have an automatically charged battery as the power source;
( b ) Have a manually operated contact maker at the steering station and in the crew accommodation area; and
( c ) Must meet the requirements of § 113.25.7 and §§ 113.25-9 through 113.25-20 of this subpart.
North Dakota Regional Haze EPA-R08-OAR-2010-0406 Summary of Dr. James Staudt’s Expertise

Dr. Staudt is the Principal Owner of Andover Techno logy Partners, a management and technology consulting business that commenced opera tions in mid-1997. Dr. Staudt is a nationally recognized expert on air pollution contr ol. He has authored emissions control technology documents and software that are used by air pollution control professionals in the United States, Europe, and Asia. He has developed cost and performance algorithms that are used by the EPA for assessment of NO x , SO 2, and mercury control technologies. On behalf of his clients, he has testified in litigation and pub lic hearings, appeared on television, and made presentations before Congressional staff. Dr. Stau dt was the Programs Manager at Fuel Tech, Inc. from 1988-1990. Fuel Tech supplies proprietar y air pollution control technologies and furnace additives to major industries worldwide. F uel Tech is currently a market leader in SNCR. Dr. Staudt recently presented a paper at the AWMA, EPA, EPRI, DOE Combined Power Plant Air Pollution Control "Mega" Symposium, Augus t 30-September 2, 2010, Baltimore, Maryland which reviewed the performance benefits in terms of ammonia slip, reagent consumption, and fly ash ammonia that is possible t hough optimization of SNCR operation using

the information from continuous and real-time monit oring of ammonia slip. 1

1 Staudt, J., Hoover, B., Trautner, P., McCool, S., a nd Frey, J., “Optimization of Constellation Energy’ s SNCR System at Crane Units 1 and 2 Using Continuous Ammo nia Measurement,” AWMA, EPA, EPRI, DOE Combined Power Plant Air Pollution Control “Mega” Symposium, August 30-September 2, 2010, Baltimore, MD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001071003
<NAME> COAXIAL LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    12,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,700
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,580
<SALES>                                         28,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,096
<CGS>                                           10,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 502.10 Availability of records. ( a ) Each person desiring access to a record covered by this part must comply with the following provisions: ( 1 ) A written request must be made for the record.
( 2 ) Such request must indicate that it is being made under the Freedom of Information Act.
( 3 ) The envelope in which the request is sent must be prominently marked with the letters “FOIA.”
( 4 ) The request must be addressed to the appropriate official or employee of the Commission as set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 5 ) The foregoing requirements must be complied with whether the request is mailed or hand-delivered to the Commission.
( b ) If the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section are not met, the twenty-day time limit described in § 502.10(a) will not begin to run until the request has been identified by an official or employee of the Commission as a request under the Freedom of Information Act and has been received by the appropriate official or employee of the Commission.
( c ) Each person desiring access to a record covered in this part that is located in the Commission, or to obtain a copy of such a record, must make a written request to the Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street NW, Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579.
( d ) Each request should reasonably describe the particular record requested. The request should specify the subject matter, the date when it was made and the person or office that made it. If the description is insufficient, the official or employee handling the request may notify the person making the request and, to the extent possible, indicate the additional data required.
( e ) Each record made available under this section is available for inspection and copying during regular working hours. Original documents may be copied but may not be released from custody.
( f ) Authority to administer this part in connection with Commission records is delegated to the Administrative Officer or the Commission employee acting in that official's capacity.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et

al.,

Defendants.

Action No. 3:08–CV–483

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay all Proceedings

Pending a Decision in Citizen United v. FEC (Docket No. 90). Defendants do not

oppose this Motion. Upon due consideration, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Stay

pending a decision in Citizen United v. FEC. The parties are DIRECTED to contact

the Court either by the date Citizen United is resolved or by March 31, 2009,

whichever is earlier, to provide a status report of the case before this Court. 

Let the Clerk send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

It is SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this 7th day of January 2009

 /s/ 

James R. Spencer

Chief United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS Document 98 Filed 01/07/2009 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As
Adopted Pursuant to





Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael L. Wynhoff,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      March 5, 2010
            /s/
      Michael L. WynhoffMichael
      L. WynhoffChief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),

I, Harry Masuda, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Human BioSystems. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended
June 30, 2005 to which this certification is attached as an exhibit
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated:August 15, 2005


/s/ Harry Masuda
-----------------
Harry Masuda
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.33 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.34 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.35 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.36 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.37 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.38 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.39 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.40 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.41 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.42 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.43 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.44 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.45 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.46 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.47 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.48 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.49 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.50 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.51 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.52 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.53 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.54 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.55 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.56 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.57 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.58 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.59 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.60 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 1-12 filed 07/28/14 PageID.61 Page 29 of 29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GARY ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff, 

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

_______________________ __________/

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-14002

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Gary Robertson brings this action challenging the final decision of the

Commissioner denying his application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits

and Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act. The case was

referred to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

(Doc. 4). Both parties filed dispositive motions, and in a Report and Recommendation

("R&R") dated October 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Whalen recommended that

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and that Defendant's Motion for

Summary Judgment be granted. (Doc. 19).

 In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R

needed to be filed within “14 days of service” and that a party’s failure to file objections

would waive any further right of appeal. (Id., p. 18). Neither party filed an objection.

2:14-cv-14002-MOB-RSW Doc # 20 Filed 01/29/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 426
Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to

de novo review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19), DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. 15), and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.

18). Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: January 29, 2016 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their

respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on January 29, 2016.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2:14-cv-14002-MOB-RSW Doc # 20 Filed 01/29/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 427
# C_2008244EN.01003201.xml

| 25.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/32

---

Corrigendum to Commission notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 155 of 20 June 2008
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 155 of 20 June 2008

(2008/C 244/11)

On page 15, in point 3.3 ‘Valuation of individual guarantees for SMEs’, the table is replaced by the following:

| ‘Credit quality | Standard & Poor's | Fitch | Moody's | Annual safe harbour premium |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Highest quality | AAA | AAA | Aaa | 0,4 % |
| Very strong payment capacity | AA + | AA + | Aa 1 | 0,4 % |
| AA | AA | Aa 2 | |
| AA – | AA – | Aa 3 | |
| Strong payment capacity | A + | A + | A 1 | 0,55 % |
| A | A | A 2 | |
| A – | A – | A 3 | |
| Adequate payment capacity | BBB + | BBB + | Baa 1 | 0,8 % |
| BBB | BBB | Baa 2 | |
| BBB – | BBB – | Baa 3 | |
| Payment capacity is vulnerable to adverse conditions | BB + | BB + | Ba 1 | |
| BB | BB | Ba 2 | 2 % |
| BB – | BB – | Ba 3 | |
| Payment capacity is likely to be impaired by adverse conditions | B + | B + | B 1 | 3,8 % |
| B | B | B 2 | |
| B – | B – | B 3 | 6,3 % |
| Payment capacity is dependent upon sustained favourable conditions | CCC + | CCC + | Caa 1 | No safe-harbour annual premium can be provided |
| CCC | CCC | Caa 2 |
| CCC – | CCC – | Caa 3 |
| CC | CC | |
| | C | |
| In or near default | SD | DDD | Ca | No safe-harbour annual premium can be provided’ |
| D | DD | C |
| | D | |

‘Credit quality

Standard & Poor's

Fitch

Moody's

Annual safe harbour premium

Highest quality

AAA

AAA

Aaa

0,4 %

Very strong payment capacity

AA +

AA +

Aa 1

0,4 %

AA

AA

Aa 2

AA –

AA –

Aa 3

Strong payment capacity

A +

A +

A 1

0,55 %

A

A

A 2

A –

A –

A 3

Adequate payment capacity

BBB +

BBB +

Baa 1

0,8 %

BBB

BBB

Baa 2

BBB –

BBB –

Baa 3

Payment capacity is vulnerable to adverse conditions

BB +

BB +

Ba 1

BB

BB

Ba 2

2 %

BB –

BB –

Ba 3

Payment capacity is likely to be impaired by adverse conditions

B +

B +

B 1

3,8 %

B

B

B 2

B –

B –

B 3

6,3 %

Payment capacity is dependent upon sustained favourable conditions

CCC +

CCC +

Caa 1

No safe-harbour annual premium can be provided

CCC

CCC

Caa 2

CCC –

CCC –

Caa 3

CC

CC

C

In or near default

SD

DDD

Ca

No safe-harbour annual premium can be provided’

D

DD

C

D

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-5358 September Term, 2015

 1:11-cv-02168-CKK

Filed On: October 16, 2015

Combat Veterans for Congress Political Action

Committee and David H. Wiggs, Treasurer, 

 Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission, 

 Appellee

BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge; Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown, Griffith,

Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Millett, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

 Upon consideration of appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc, and the

absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken R. Meadows

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #13-5358 Document #1578485 Filed: 10/16/2015 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Case No: 14-cr-20652 

 Plaintiff, 

 Hon. Sean F. Cox 

JAMES FIZER, JR., 

 Filed Under Seal

 Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

MOTION AND ORDER TO SEAL THE UNITED STATES’ EXHIBITS TO 

ITS RESPONSE AND BRIEF OPPOSING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE 

The United States of America, by its undersigned attorneys, respectfully 

requests that the United States’ Exhibits to its Response and Brief Opposing the 

Defendant’s Motion for Compassionate Release, as well as this motion and order 

to seal, be sealed until further order of the Court, because it contains sensitive and 

personal information about the defendant. 

Respectfully submitted, 

MATTHEW SCHNEIDER 

United States Attorney 

 

s/Caitlin B. Casey 

CAITLIN B. CASEY 

Assistant United States Attorney 

211 West Fort, Suite 2001 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

(313) 226-9769 

Date: November 23, 2020 caitlin.casey@usdoj.gov 

Case 2:14-cr-20652-SFC-MKM ECF No. 53, PageID.186 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Case No: 14-cr-20652 

 Plaintiff, 

 Hon. Sean F. Cox 

JAMES FIZER, JR., 

 Filed Under Seal

 Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

ORDER TO SEAL 

The government having moved to seal the United States’ Exhibits to its 

Response and Brief Opposing the Defendant’s Motion for Compassionate Release, 

and the Court being duly advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that leave is Granted for the United States’ to 

file its Exhibits to its Response and Brief Opposing the Defendant’s Motion for 

Compassionate Release under seal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 23, 2020 s/Sean F. Cox 

 Sean F. Cox 

 U. S. District Judge 

Case 2:14-cr-20652-SFC-MKM ECF No. 53, PageID.187 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 2
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DARNELL BROWN, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-14350 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

NICOLE CARTER, et al. 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #21) 

AND DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS NICOLE CARTER 

AND DUSHNA POPOVSKI WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

On November 12, 2014, Plaintiff Darnell Brown (“Brown”) filed this Title 

VII action against Defendants Nicole Carter (“Carter”), Dushna Popovski 

(“Popovski”), and Pellumb Sulaj (“Sulaj”). (See Complaint, ECF #1.) Sulaj filed 

an Answer on January 21, 2015. (See ECF #12.) After summonses for Carter and 

Popovski were returned as unexecuted (see ECF ## 16, 17), Magistrate Judge 

Anthony Patti ordered Brown to show cause why his claims against Carter and 

Popovski should not be dismissed for failure to effect service. (See ECF #18.) 

Carter responded that he could not find addresses for either Carter or Popovski, 

and he requested that the case proceed against Sulaj only. (See ECF #19.) 

2:14-cv-14350-APP Doc # 22 Filed 04/27/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 67
2 

On April 7, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patti issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss Brown’s claims against 

Carter and Popovski without prejudice “for failure to effect service pursuant to 

Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” (See the “R&R,” ECF #21.) 

The R&R stated that the parties could object to and seek review of the 

recommendation within fourteen days. (See id. at 3-4, Pg. ID 64-65.) 

No party has objected to the R&R. Failure to file objections to the R&R 

waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human 

Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231,

829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the 

Magistrate Judge’s R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review 

the matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s April 7, 

2015, Report and Recommendation (ECF #21) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of 

this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R&R, that 

Brown’s claims against Defendants Nicole Carter and Dushna Popovski are 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to effect service. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 27, 2015 

2:14-cv-14350-APP Doc # 22 Filed 04/27/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 68
3 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on April 27, 2015, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-14350-APP Doc # 22 Filed 04/27/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 69