alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Intergrated Energy, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the operation of the
Company.


Dated:
      November 16, 2009By:
                /s/
      Gao
      XinchengGao
      XinchengChief
      Executive Officer and
President





Dated:
      November 16, 2009By:
                /s/
      Albert
      C. PuAlbert
      C. PuChief
      Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135372 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135372 

 COA: 278367 
 Wayne CC: 01-009370-01 

ROBERT T. HINDS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**638 CA 13-01521**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., DEFENDANT.

------------------------------------------------ ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS,

V

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BEVERLY S. BRAUN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (ANDREW O. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered May 15, 2013. The order, among other things, granted that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking summary judgment against defendant Elizabeth Pierce Olmstead, M.D. Center for the Visually Impaired.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### § 113.10-3 Cable runs.

Cable runs between the fire alarm annunciator and fire detecting or fire alarm zones must be as direct as practicable and, where practicable, must not be in staterooms, lockers, or other enclosed spaces in order to reduce the risk of damage by a localized fire or other cause.
#### § 114.560 Appeals.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this subchapter, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal therefrom in accordance with § 1.03 in subchapter A of this chapter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SANDRA ALCAZAR, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 14-cv-13739 

vs. HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

WALGREENS CO., d/b/a 

WALGREENS, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS AND,

FOLLOWING STAY, TO PERMIT A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [#5] 

On September 30, 2014, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint pursuant to the Fair

Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Presently before the Court is the parties’ Joint

Motion to Stay All Proceedings and Following Stay, to Permit a Second Amended

Complaint, filed on December 31, 2014. 

In the present motion, the parties indicate that the First Amended Complaint will need

to be amended in order to include certain information that is missing in the Amended

Complaint, including but not limited to, the dates each of the thirty-eight (38) Plaintiffs were

employed with Defendant, and the specific store where each Plaintiff worked as an Executive

Assistant Manager. The parties further argue that they are interested in participating in early

-1-

2:14-cv-13739-GAD-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 64
settlement discussions and believe it will be a waste of time to engage in scheduling

conferences, formal discovery and motion practice. 

On February 10, 2015, the parties appeared for a scheduling conference in this matter. 

At the conference, the parties discussed the nature and status of the case. The Court and the

parties agreed to permit amendment of the pleadings no later than March 20, 2015. Upon

consideration of the discussion at the conference and the present motion, the Court does not

find a stay of the instant proceedings is warranted under the circumstances. 

Accordingly, the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay All Proceedings and, Following Stay,

to Permit a Second Amended Complaint [#5] is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 11, 2015 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

-2-

2:14-cv-13739-GAD-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 65
#### § 112.35-3 Normal source for emergency loads.

The normal source for emergency loads must be the ship's service generating plant.
EXHIBIT 15.1

                           Accountants' Review Report

Board of Directors
Pharmacy Buying Association, Inc. and Subsidiary
d/b/a TrueCare Pharmacy
Kansas City, Missouri

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pharmacy Buying
Association, Inc. and subsidiary, d/b/a TrueCare Pharmacy, as of March 31, 2003
and the related consolidated statements of operations for the three and three
months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated statements of changes
in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2003
and 2002 in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review
Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. All
information included in these consolidated financial statements is the
representation of the management of Pharmacy Buying Association, Inc. and
subsidiary, d/b/a TrueCare Pharmacy.

A review consists principally of inquiries of Company personnel and analytical
procedures applied to financial data. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements in order for them
to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 was audited by us and we
expressed an unqualified opinion on it in our report dated February 25, 2003 but
we have not performed any auditing procedures since that date.


HOUSE PARK & DOBRATZ, P.C.
Kansas City, Missouri
May 5, 2003
# EPA

REGISTRATION

NO. 86530-1______________________________________________________________

Page 61 is not included in this copy.

Pages through are not included in this copy.

___________________________________________________ ______________

The material not included contains the following type of

information:

____ _ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ _ _ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quali ty control procedures.

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__ X __ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending regi stration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data.

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _

.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

__ __ Internal deliberative information.

__ __ Privileged a ttorney

- c lient communication

.

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.
§ 140.425 Fall overboard prevention. ( a ) The owner or managing operator of a towing vessel must establish procedures to address fall overboard prevention and recovery of persons in the water, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) Personal protective equipment;
( 2 ) Safely working on the tow;
( 3 ) Safety while line handling;
( 4 ) Safely moving between the vessel and a tow, pier, structure, or other vessel; and
( 5 ) Use of retrieval equipment.
( b ) The owner, managing operator, or master must ensure that all persons on board comply with the policies and procedures in this section.
§ 116.1200 Ballast. ( a ) Any solid fixed ballast used to comply with the requirements of Parts 170 and 171 in subchapter S of this chapter must be: ( 1 ) Stowed in a manner that prevents shifting of the ballast; and
( 2 ) Installed to the satisfaction of the cognizant OCMI.
( b ) Solid fixed ballast may not be located forward of the collision bulkhead unless the installation and arrangement of the ballast and the collision bulkhead minimizes the risk of the ballast penetrating the bulkhead in a collision.
( c ) Solid fixed ballast may not be removed from a vessel or relocated unless approved by the cognizant OCMI except that ballast may be temporarily moved for a vessel examination or repair if it is replaced to the satisfaction of the OCMI.
( d ) Water ballast, either as an active system or permanent, must be approved by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center.
#### § 506.3 Rate of benefits payable.

Detention benefits awarded to a civilian American citizen will be paid at the rate of $150 for each calendar month of internment or during the period in which that civilian American citizen went into hiding to avoid capture and internment by a hostile force. Awards shall take account of fractional parts of a calendar month.
§ 108.413 Fusible element fire detection system. ( a ) A fusible element fire detection system may be installed.
( b ) The arrangements for the system must be acceptable to the Commandant.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Gregory Cain 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

Asset Acceptance, LLC 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:14-cv-13870-GCS-DRG 

Judge: George Caram Steeh 

Magistrate Judge: David R. Grand 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 This matter having come before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal 

with Prejudice submitted by the parties; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby 

dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. 

DATE: March 9, 2015 s/George Caram Steeh 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 2:14-cv-13870-GCS-DRG ECF No. 15, PageID.42 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) LRA 917 

Request for Consideretion of a Legfd ) 

Question ) 

CERl'MCATIGN 

I, Shelley B. Gatr, recording secretary far the Federal Election Commismcm executive 

session on November 28,2012, do herein certify lliat Ibe ComnsB^ 

to conclude that 11 CJ.R. § 106.7((0(]) requires tibeConmiillBes to keep a mont^ 

enqiloyees paid exclusively with federal funds and inform tba requestor that, as an exercise of 

prosecutorial discretion, Ifae Commission will iiot pursue recordkeeping vto 

to keep time logs or provide afiSdavits to account for employee salaries paid for with 100% 

federal fonds and reported as such. 

Coinmissioners Baueriy, Ibrnler, McOahn n, Fetersen, and Weint^^ 

affirmatively for the decision. Commissioner Wahher dissented. 

Attest: 

Die "SheOwB.aO Shelley E. 

Dqnity Secretary of the Commission
Opinion issued February 12, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 0 11 0 8
- CV

——————————— NEWPARK DRILLING FLUIDS, LLC , Appellant V. FORTITUDE ENERGY, L LC , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 269 t h District C ourt

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015
- 57336

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Newpark Drilling Fluids, LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 1( a) (1)

. Although appellant’ s motion does not
contai n a certificate of conference, it contains a certificate of service on counsel for appell e e, the motion has been on file with this Court for more than ten days, and no2

response has been filed

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.5(d), (e), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). N o other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal

. See T EX . R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1) , (d), 43.2(f)

. We dismiss a ny other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley , and L an d au
.
#### § 681.41 What judicial review is available?

31 U.S.C. 3805 authorizes judicial review by the appropriate United States District Court of any final NSF decision imposing penalties or assessments, and specifies the procedures for such review. To obtain judicial review, a defendant must file a petition with the appropriate court in a timely manner.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-923 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Memorandum of Understanding between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ZAMBIA 

Signed at Reston and Lusaka September 9 and 23, 2002 

 with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ZAMBIA 

Scientific Cooperation 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at Reston and Lusaka 

 September 9 and 23, 2002; 

 Entered into force September 23, 2002. 

 With annexes.
§ 143.415 Navigation lights. ( a ) Towing vessels more than 65 feet in length must use navigation lights that meet UL 1104 (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter) or other standards accepted by the Coast Guard.
( b ) Towing vessels 65 feet or less in length may meet the requirements listed in 33 CFR 183.810 or paragraph (a) of this section.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Loral Space & Communications Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Harvey B. Rein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ HARVEY B. REINHarvey B. ReinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


February 28, 2012
# Senate Floor Activity - Wednesday, January 15, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Wednesday, January 15)

H.R. 3547

 S.Amdt. 2655

 S.Amdt. 2656

 S.Amdt. 2657

 S.Amdt. 2658

 S.Amdt. 2659

H.J.Res. 106

 11

S. 1845

S. 1846

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
#### § 111.106-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned), as defined in § 125.160 of this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12199-12200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 17, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Semiconductor Test 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Rasco GmbH, Kolbermoor, GERMANY; Gerhard Kessler, Munich, 
GERMANY; Rood Technology GmbH & Co., Nordlingen, GERMANY; 
Multitestelektron Systems GmbH, Rosenheim, GERMANY; and Form Factor, 
Inc., Livermore, CA have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Xandex, Inc., Petaluma, CA; Swanson Semiconductor Service, 
Fort Worth, TX; PXIT, Lexington, MA; HILEVEL, Irvine, CA; and EADS-
North American Defense, Irvine, CA have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture. In addition, Philips Semiconductors has changed its name to 
NXP Semiconductors, San Jose, CA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written

[[Page 12200]]

notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 27, 2003, Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 17, 2003 (68 FR 35913).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 25, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67643).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-1200 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 126.160 Tests and inspections during repairs or alterations, or during riveting, welding, burning, or other hot work. ( a ) NFPA 306 must be used as a guide in conducting the examinations and issuances of certificates required by this section.
( b ) Until an examination has determined that work can proceed safely, no riveting, welding, burning, or other hot work may commence.
( c ) Each examination must be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) At any port or site inside the United States or its territories and possessions, a marine chemist certified by the NFPA must make the examination. If the services of such a chemist are not reasonably available, the cognizant OCMI, upon the recommendation of the contractor and the owner or operator of the OSV, may authorize another person to make the examination. If this indicates that a repair or alteration, or hot work, can be undertaken safely, the person performing the examination shall issue a certificate, setting forth the spaces covered and any necessary conditions to be met, before the work starts. These conditions must include any requirements necessary to maintain safe conditions in the spaces covered and must include any necessary further examinations and certificates. In particular the conditions must include precautions necessary to eliminate or minimize hazards caused by protective coatings or by cargo residues.
( 2 ) At any port or site outside the United States or its territories and possessions, where the services of a certified marine chemist or other person authorized by the cognizant OCMI are not reasonably available, the master, owner, or operator of the vessel shall make the examination and a proper entry in the OSV's logbook.
( d ) The master shall obtain a copy of each certificate issued by the person making the examination described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The master, through and for the persons under his control, shall maintain safe conditions aboard the OSV by full observance of each condition to be met, listed in the certificate issued under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 ,
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.
 HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATIONSeptember 28, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Michael T. BriganteName:
    Michael T. BriganteTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer