alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1124 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MARITIME INTERDICTION 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KIRIBATI 

Signed at Tarawa November 24, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KIRIBATI 

Maritime Interdiction 

Agreement signed at Tarawa November 24, 2008; 

 Entered into force November 24, 2008.
Exhibit 32.2



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Sharpe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin M. SharpeKevin M. Sharpe, Chief Financial Officer




May 16, 2005
EXHIBIT 32

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss 1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2003                               /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                                      ---------------------
                                                      Daniel B. O'Brien
                                                      Chief Executive Officer






                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2003                               /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                                      ---------------------
                                                      Daniel B. O'Brien
                                                      Chief Financial Officer








         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The RiceX Company, and will be retained by Flexible Solutions
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

         This certification "accompanies" the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB to
which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities Exchange Commission,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing).
§ 130.480 Test procedure and operations manual. ( a ) A procedure for tests to be conducted on automated equipment by the operator and the Coast Guard must be submitted to comply with § 127.110 of this subchapter.
( b ) The procedure for tests must— ( 1 ) Be in a sequential-checkoff format;
( 2 ) Include the required alarms, controls, and communications; and
( 3 ) Set forth details of the tests.
( c ) Details of the tests must specify status of equipment, functions necessary to complete the tests, and expected results.
( d ) No tests may simulate conditions by misadjustments, artificial signals, or improper wiring.
( e ) A detailed operations manual that describes the operation and indicates the location of each system installed to comply with this part must be submitted to comply with § 127.110 of this subchapter.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.420 Flammable gas analyzers. When Table 148.10 of this part associates a material with a reference to a paragraph in this section, each vessel transporting the material, other than an unmanned barge, must have on board a gas analyzer appropriate for the flammable gas listed in that paragraph. At least two members of the crew must be knowledgeable in the use of the equipment. The equipment must be maintained in a condition ready for use, capable of measuring 0 to 100 percent LFL for the gas indicated, and calibrated in accordance with the instructions of its manufacturer. The atmosphere in the cargo hold must be tested before any person is allowed to enter. If flammable gases are detected, the space must be ventilated and retested before entry. The flammable gases for which the requirements of this section must be met are: ( a ) Carbon monoxide;
( b ) Hydrogen; and
( c ) Methane.
§ 681.36 When does the initial decision of the ALJ become final? ( a ) The initial decision of the ALJ becomes the final decision of NSF, and shall be binding on all parties 30 days after it is issued, unless any party timely files a motion for reconsideration or any defendant adjudged to have submitted a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim or statement timely appeals to the authority head of NSF, as set forth in § 681.37.
( b ) If the ALJ disposes of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision, the ALJ's order on the motion for reconsideration becomes the final decision of NSF 30 days after the order is issued, unless a defendant adjudged to have submitted a false, fictitious, fraudulent claim or statement timely appeals to the authority head of NSF, as set forth in § 681.37.
§ 131.330 Emergency instructions. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by this section, the master of each vessel shall prepare and post durable emergency-instruction placards in conspicuous locations accessible to the crew members and offshore workers.
( b ) The instruction placards must contain the recommended “Emergency Instructions” listed in § 131.340 that, in the judgment of the cognizant OCMI, apply. The placards must be further designed to address the equipment, arrangement, and operation peculiar to each vessel.
§ 122.210 Alcohol or drug use by individuals directly involved in casualties. ( a ) For each marine casualty required to be reported by § 122.202, the owner, agent, master, or person in charge of the vessel shall determine whether there is any evidence of alcohol or drug use by individuals directly involved in the casualty.
( b ) The owner, agent, master, or person in charge of the vessel shall include in the written report (Form CG-2692), submitted for the casualty information which: ( 1 ) Identifies those individuals for whom evidence of drug or alcohol use, or evidence of intoxication, has been obtained; and
( 2 ) Specifies the method used to obtain such evidence, such as personal observation of the individual, or by chemical testing of the individual.
( c ) An entry must be made in the Official Logbook, if carried, pertaining to those individuals for whom evidence of intoxication is obtained. The individual must be informed of this entry and the entry must be witnessed by a second person.
( d ) If an individual directly involved in a casualty refuses to submit to, or cooperate in, the administration of a timely chemical test, when directed by a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or any other law enforcement officer authorized to obtain a chemical test under Federal, State, or local law, or by the owner, agent, master, or person in charge, this fact must be noted in the official Logbook, if carried, and in the written report (Form CG 2692), and will be admissible as evidence in any administrative proceeding.
#### DONATO LATTANZI, PLAINTIFF, v. PUBLIC SERVICE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided May 4, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justice Parker.

Eor the rule, *Henry H. Fryling.*

Contra, *William C. French.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought the present suit to recover compensation for personal injuries received by him in a collision between a motor truck which belonged to him, and in which he was riding, and a bus of the defendant company, and also for damages done to his truck. The plaintiff’s truck was being driven by his son, a boy eighteen years old, who had no driver’s license. The trial resulted i'n a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor, the jury awarding him $10,000.

Our examination of the testimony in the case satisfies us that the finding of the jury, which exonerates the plaintiff’s driver from negligence contributing to the accident, is contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

Eor this reason the rule to show cause will be made absolute.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOHN KING, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided September 13, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

For the defendant in error, *John Drewen,*prosecutor of the pleas.

For the plaintiff in error, *George E. Cubley.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant in this case was indicted for murder and convicted of murder in the first degree. Life imprisonment was recommended by the jury. The writ of error must be dismissed, as it does not appear in the state of the case sent up with the writ of error, that application was made to the chancellor for a writ of error to the Supreme Court. This mhst be done under the ease of *State*v. Giberson, 94 *N. J. Eq.*25.

The writ of error is therefore dismissed.
§ 118.300 Fire pumps. ( a ) A self priming, power driven fire pump must be installed on each vessel.
( b ) On a vessel without overnight accommodations, or with overnight accommodations for not more than 49 passengers, the fire pump must be capable of delivering a single hose stream from the highest hydrant, through the hose and nozzle required by § 118.320 of this part, at a pitot tube pressure of 345 kPa (50 psi).
( c ) On a vessel carrying more than 600 passengers or with overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers, the fire pump must meet § 76.10-5 of this chapter.
( d ) A fire pump may be driven by a propulsion engine. A fire pump must be permanently connected to the fire main and may be connected to the bilge system to meet the requirements of § 119.520 of this subchapter.
( e ) A fire pump must be capable of both remote operation from the operating station and local operation at the pump.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 917, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20556, May 7, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51351, Sept. 30, 1997]
S10-I00422-019

l)C1J[

## Dc uu , I 

# sheville

April 16, 2010

The Honorable Raymond H. laHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAve, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010--' Dear Mr. Secretary: Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement flied by, American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworJd to compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. this increasedlnteralliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits ofthe Department'sOpen Skies policy
- first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then byserving as afoundation forfurther liberalization acrossAsia. After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have apositive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefitfrom having three competitive air alliances to choosefrom. I urgeyou to quicklyapprove this application. Sincerely,

....

# ~~ Lew Bleiwels, A.A.E. Airport Director

61 TerminolDr" Suite I, FleteM)r, NC 28732 • Phone828-o84,2226 •**Fo~** 860-347-2014 www.fiyovl.com
#### §§ 11.219-11.223 [Reserved]
#### Mary Barber, *Respondent, v.*Alonzo H. Lewis, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with 'costs.

Haight, J., not sitting.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-15 Commandant.

This term means Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10757

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GRADY LEE WIKE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(1:94-CV-150-C)

February 22, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Grady Lee Wike, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, in

which he argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel

at sentencing. We affirm.

Wike pleaded guilty to posse ssion with intent to distribute

100 grams or more of methamphetamine, and was sentenced to a term

of 120 months in prison to be followed by four years of supervised

release. In seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Wike alleges2

that his trial counsel failed to require the Government to prove at

sentencing that Wike was in possession of d-methamphetamine rather

than l-methamphetamine. Wike contends that this failure prejudiced

him at sentencing, since he would have been sentenced under a lower

guideline range if the methamphetamine involved was type l.

Even assuming that Wike's couns el performed deficiently in

failing to address the distinction between d- and l-methamphetamine

at his sentencing, we conclude that Wike was not prejudiced because

Wike has not alleged that he did in fact possess l-methamphetamine.

See United States v. Dickey , No. 94-10984, slip op. 6 (5th Cir.

June 15, 1995) (finding no prejudice in absence of allegation that

methamphetamine involved actuall y was type l); U nited States v.

Devine , No. 95-50183, slip op. 3 (5th Cir. Aug. 30, 1995) (same).

Though a remand may sometimes be appropriate to allow a defendant

to present specific evidence of prejudice to support a conclusory

allegation that the methamphetamine involved was type l rather than

type d, see United States v. Acklen

, 47 F.3d 739, 743-44 (5th Cir.

1995), the absence of any such allegation here renders a remand

inappropriate, particularly given the facts of this case. Indeed,

the record evidence indicates that the methamphetamine involved in

Wike's offense was type d, since the arresting age nts testified

that Wike exhibited signs of physiological impairment at the time

of his arrest, which is characteristic of d-methamphetamine rather

than l-methamphetamine, and Wike admitted ingesting t he drug

earlier in the day.3

Wike also contends that the district court committed plain

error in sentencing him under the harsher guidelines without proof

that the methamphetamine involved was type d rather than type l.

We agree with the lower courts that t his sentencing claim is not

cognizabl e in a § 2255 motion. S ee United States v. Seyfert

, 67

F.3d 544, 546 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
§ 660.8 How does the Director provide states an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development? ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Director gives state processes or directly affected state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities: ( 1 ) At least 30 days from the date established by the Director to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance in covered programs (i.e., those referenced in § 660.3) in the form of continuation awards that are not peer reviewed; and
( 2 ) At least 60 days from the date established by the Director to comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial assistance in covered programs (i.e., those referenced § 660.3) other than continuation awards that are not peer reviewed.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Foundation have been delegated.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 March 19, 2007

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] Appeal from the United

 Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for

 ] the Southern District of 

No. 05-4327 v. ] Illinois

 ] 

JAMES R. GIBSON, ] No. 01 CR 30005

 Defendant-Appellant. ] 

 ] J. Phil Gilbert,

 ] Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of this court, dated March 16, 2007, is

VACATED. Counsel for both parties are directed to comply with the schedule set

for supplemental briefing in the order dated March 14, 2007.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.432 Cooling systems. ( a ) Each cargo cooling system must have an equivalent standby unit that is installed and that can be placed in operation immediately after failure of the primary cooling system.
( b ) Each tankship that has a cargo tank with a required cooling system must have a manual that contains: ( 1 ) A piping diagram for the cooling system; and
( 2 ) Instructions for changing over to the standby system described in paragraph (a) of this section.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21209, May 17, 1982]
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### §§ 151.03-55 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23.1




To the Board of Directors
PICK Communications Corp.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-20573 on Form S-8 of PICK Communication Corp. of our report dated April 29,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PICK Communications Corp.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 Form
10-K of PICK Communications Corp.


                                            /s/ Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.
                                                     Durland & Company

Palm Beach, Florida
April 30, 1999
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2017

a0906

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2017

154108(90)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154108

COA: 322195 

Wayne CC: 13-009830-FC

SHAROC RICHARDSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 2, 2017 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
#### § 115.502 Certificate of Inspection: Conditions of validity.

To maintain a valid Certificate of Inspection, you must complete your annual inspections within the periods specified in § 115.500 and your Certificate of Inspection must be endorsed.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6505, Feb. 9, 2000]
§ 11.429 Requirements for a limited master of near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 100 GRT. ( a ) An endorsement as limited master for service on near-coastal waters on vessels of less than 100 GRT may be issued to an applicant to be employed by organizations such as yacht clubs, marinas, formal camps, and educational institutions. An endorsement issued under this section is limited to the specific activity and the locality of the yacht club, marina, or camp. To obtain this restricted endorsement, an applicant must— ( 1 ) Have 4 months of service on any waters in the operation of the type of vessel for which the endorsement is requested;
( 2 ) Satisfactorily complete a safe boating course approved by the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators, or a safe boating course conducted by the U.S. Power Squadron or the American Red Cross, or a Coast Guard-approved course. This course must have been completed within 5 years before the date of application; and
( 3 ) Pass a limited examination appropriate for the activity to be conducted and the route authorized.
( b ) The first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) course certificates required by § 11.201(i) of this part will only be required when, in the opinion of the Coast Guard, the geographic area over which service is authorized precludes obtaining medical services within a reasonable time.
( c ) To obtain an endorsement for sail or auxiliary sail vessels, the applicant must submit evidence of 4 months of service on sail or auxiliary sail vessels. The required 4 months of service may have been obtained prior to issuance of the license or MMC endorsement.
( d ) Holders of this endorsement are considered to be in compliance with the STCW Convention (incorporated by reference, see § 11.102 of this part) while operating within the limitations of this endorsement.