alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 620.5 Discharge of agreement to serve or repay. ( a ) *Discharge conditions.* The Director may provide for the partial or total waiver or suspension of any service or repayment obligation by a scholarship recipient under the SFS program, including but not limited to the following circumstances: ( 1 ) *Death.* If a scholarship recipient dies, the Director discharges the obligation to complete the agreement to serve or repay based on a certified copy of the death certificate or verification of the scholarship recipient's death through an authoritative Federal or state electronic database approved for use by the Director.
( 2 ) *Total and permanent disability.* A scholarship recipient's agreement to serve or repay is discharged if the scholarship recipient becomes totally and permanently disabled. This is the condition of an individual who: ( i ) Is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that— ( A ) Can be expected to result in death;
( B ) Has lasted for a continuous period of not less than 60 months; or
( C ) Can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 60 months; or
( ii ) Has been determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to be unemployable due to a service-connected disability.
( 3 ) *Extreme hardship.* Whenever compliance by the scholarship recipient with the obligation is impossible or would involve extreme hardship to the scholarship recipient, or if enforcement of such obligation with respect to the scholarship recipient would be unconscionable. Extreme hardship could include but is not limited to financial or economic burden, medical situations, or other situations as determined by the Director of NSF.
( b ) *Written request.* ( 1 ) A scholarship recipient must submit a written application to the SFS program office, requesting a discharge from the Director of NSF in accordance with this section. Requests to discharge and refund amounts already repaid or referred to Treasury will not be considered or granted.
( 2 ) A scholarship recipient who applies for discharge must provide the Director with documentation supporting the request as well as current contact information including home address, email address, and telephone number.
( 3 ) The Director, or other official designated by the Director, will notify the scholarship recipient on the outcome of the application for discharge. If the discharge is denied, the scholarship recipient may submit a written request for reconsideration to the SFS program office. The request must be received no later than 30 calendar days after NSF sent notice of the denial to the recipient. The request must explain why the recipient believes the denial is based on an error or mistake of fact or law, or if there are any new facts or law that should be considered. The Director's determination on the request shall be final, with no further reconsideration.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RASHAD R. NAJI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 14-12743 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

 HON. ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 16) 

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s July 

28, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 16), recommending that Plaintiff’s 

motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 12) be DENIED, that Defendant’s motion for 

summary judgment (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED, and that the Commissioner be 

AFFIRMED. 

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin 

fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those 

portions of the report report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to 

which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the 

district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. 

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). The Court has reviewed and will accept the 

4:14-cv-12743-TGB-EAS Doc # 17 Filed 08/18/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 345
   

2 

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of July 28, 2015, as this Court’s findings 

of fact and conlcusions of law. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. 

Stafford’s Report and Recommendation of July 28, 2015 (Dkt. 16) is ACCEPTED

and ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment 

(Dkt. 11) is DENIED, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) is 

GRANTED, and the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner are 

AFFIRMED. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: August 18, 2015 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on August 18, 2015, using the 

CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each party. 

 By: s/A. Chubb 

Case Manager 

4:14-cv-12743-TGB-EAS Doc # 17 Filed 08/18/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 346
§ 11.431 Tonnage requirements for Great Lakes and inland endorsements for vessels of 1,600 GRT or more. ( a ) All required experience for Great Lakes and inland unlimited endorsements must be obtained on vessels of 100 GRT or more. At least one-half of the required experience must be obtained on vessels of 1,600 GRT or more.
( b ) Tonnage limitations may be imposed on these endorsements in accordance with § 11.402(b) and (c) of this subpart.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                     A.M.S. MARKETING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                         (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)


<ARTICLE>         5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                      7379
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                475
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                            8309
<PP&E>                                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                              8309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                          0
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                                    4588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                  4151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                8739
<SALES>                                                                    10052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                           10052
<CGS>                                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           38566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (28514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      (28514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             (28514)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             (.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                  0




</TABLE>
# C_2008114EN.01000401.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/4

---

List of ships that were refused access to Community ports between 1 September 2007 and 31 March 2008, pursuant to Article 7b of Council Directive 95/21/EC on the port State control of ships (1)

1

(2008/C 114/04)

Under Article 7b(1) of Directive 95/21/CE on the port State control of ships, ships which have been detained several times shall be refused access to the ports of the Member States (2).

2

The table below gives the list of ships that were refused access to Community ports between 1 September 2007 and 31 March 2008.

| Name of ship | IMO number | Type of ship | Flag |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AGIOS NIKOLAOS II | 7378664 | Bulk carrier | Comoros |
| BLUE ICE | 7340851 | Oil tanker | St Kitts and Nevis |
| HAJ YAMAK (3) | 7312684 | Bulk carrier | Panama |

Name of ship

IMO number

Type of ship

Flag

AGIOS NIKOLAOS II

7378664

Bulk carrier

Comoros

BLUE ICE

7340851

Oil tanker

St Kitts and Nevis

HAJ YAMAK (3)

3

7312684

Bulk carrier

Panama

---

(1)  Directive as last amended by Directive 2001/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 (OJ L 19, 22.1.2002, p. 17).

1

(2)  The first paragraph of Article 7b reads:

2

‘A Member State shall ensure that a ship in one of the categories of Annex XI, section A, is refused access to its ports, except in the situations described in Article 11(6), if the ship:

either:

| — | flies the flag of a State appearing in the black list as published in the annual report of the MOU, and |
| --- | --- |

—

flies the flag of a State appearing in the black list as published in the annual report of the MOU, and

| — | has been detained more than twice in the course of the preceding 24 months in a port of a State signatory of the MOU, |
| --- | --- |

—

has been detained more than twice in the course of the preceding 24 months in a port of a State signatory of the MOU,

or:

| — | flies the flag of a State described as “very high risk” or “high risk” in the black list as published in the annual report of the MOU, and |
| --- | --- |

—

flies the flag of a State described as “very high risk” or “high risk” in the black list as published in the annual report of the MOU, and

| — | has been detained more than once in the course of the preceding 36 months in a port of a State signatory of the MOU. |
| --- | --- |

—

has been detained more than once in the course of the preceding 36 months in a port of a State signatory of the MOU.

The refusal of access shall become applicable immediately the ship has been authorised to leave the port where it has been the subject of a second or third detention as appropriate.’.

(3)  Ship for which the access refusal order was subsequently lifted in accordance with the procedures described in part B of Annex XI to Directive 95/21/EC.

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEATLH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal concerning individuals associated 
with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Innovative Therapies and 
Clinical Studies For Screenable Disorders.
    Date: April 27, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Crowne Plaza Washington National Airport, 1489 Jefferson 
Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1486, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff9c979e919891bf929e9693d1919697d1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd9e959c939a93bd909c9491d3939495d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 26, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1614 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Compare to Figure 12.  Disposal sites and dredged material deposits appear as isolated circular high-backscatter features that coalesce to form a nearly continuous high-backscatter blanket.  In both Figures 12 and 13, submerged reefs are characterized by high backscatter whereas natural sediment is characterized by low backscatter.  Note that artifacts visible in the sidescan data are not present in multibeam map by comparing Figures 12 and 13.

*go to larger versionof Figure 12 (1.9MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, K-1-93-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77861-77862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Eighth Meeting, RTCA Special Committee 204: 406 MHz Emergency 
Locator Transmitters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 204 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 204: 406 MHz Emergency Locator 
Transmitters.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 16-17, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036-533.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 202 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> January 16-17:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome, Introductory and Administrative 
Remarks, Review Agenda, Review Terms of Reference/Status).
    <bullet> Approval of Summary for the

[[Page 77862]]

Seventh meeting held on 23-24 October 2006, RTCA Paper No. 279-06/
SC204-019.
    <bullet> EUROCAE ELT Status.
    <bullet> Committee Presentations, Discussion, Recommendations.
    <bullet> Revisions/Updates to DO-204-Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards for 406 MHz Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT).
    <bullet> Any New Items Discussions.
    <bullet> PLBs.
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Assignment/Review of 
Future Work, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn).

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 19, 2006.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 06-9861 Filed 12-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**21**
**st**

**        Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                                                                       | /*s/              Peter J. Prygelski, III* |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Peter J. Prygelski,              III,              Chief Financial Officer** | **November                09, 2007**       |

----
Amendment
  Original Agreement First Amendment Second Amendment Agreement
    Extension of Feasibility Period as to Remaining Due Diligence Contingencies
 Refund of Deposit
 1




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Effect of Amendment
 Entire Agreement
 Counterparts
 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 2




---



##### 



SELLER
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Mark PetersonIts:
    Mark Peterson, Senior Vice President,Chief Legal Officer and SecretaryBUYER
CITY VENTURES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
companyBy:
    /s/ R. Mark BucklundIts:
    R. Mark Buckland, President 3
§ 132.100 General; preemptive effect. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, each vessel must be equipped with a fire main that complies with this subpart.
( b ) Each vessel of less than 100 gross tons and not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length may have, instead of a fire main that complies with this subpart, a hand-operated pump and a hose capable of providing an effective stream of water to each part of the vessel.
( c ) A garden hose of nominal inside diameter of at least 16 millimeters (5/8-inch) complies with paragraph (b) of this section if the hose is— ( 1 ) Of good commercial grade and is constructed of an inner rubber tube, plies of braided-fabric reinforcement, and an outer cover made of rubber or equivalent fire-resistant material; and
( 2 ) Fitted with a commercial garden-hose nozzle of high-grade bronze or equivalent metal capable of providing a solid stream and a spray pattern.
( d ) Each OSV of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) must, in addition to complying with the requirements necessary to satisfy § 125.105(a) and (b) of this subchapter— ( 1 ) Have two fire pumps, each capable of delivering water simultaneously from the two highest outlets at a pitot tube pressure of approximately 75 p.s.i.; and
( 2 ) Have fire hoses and nozzles that comply with § 34.10-10 of this chapter.
( e ) The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49348, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33884, June 7, 2012; USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48937, Aug. 18, 2014]
#### § 113.20-3 Connection boxes.

Each connection box and each switch enclosure in an automatic sprinkler system must be constructed in accordance with Type 4 or 4X of NEMA 250 or IP 56 of IEC 60529:2013 (both incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 110.10-1) requirements.

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65201, Oct. 31, 2008, as amended by USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
ADMINISTRATOR, 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Complainant, 

v. 

VANAIR MANUFACTURING, INC. 

Respondent. 

Case No. 2014-GL-70-0045 

Docket No.: FAA-2016-4269 

Judge: J.E. Sullivan 

SUBMISSION OF AGREED DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES 

The parties, pursuant to a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and the August 31, 

2016 Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures, hereby files their Submission of Agreed 

Dates for Expert Disclosures in the above-captioned matter, and Respondent states the following: 

1. A teleconference was held with Complainant on September 14, 2016. During the 

teleconference, the parties discussed dates for expert disclosure deadlines. 

2. The parties agreed that the FAA Expert Disclosure Deadline will be September 

23, 2016. 

3. Furthermore, the parties agreed that the Respondent Expert Disclosure Deadline 

will be November 18,2016. 

4. Lastly, the parties agreed that the Expert Rebuttal Reports Deadline will be 

January 13,2017. 

Dated: September 14, 2016 

Respectfully submitted, 

Jared 
2 

JohnS. Hoff 

Jared A. Schneider 

Cremer, Spina, Shaughnessy, Jansen & 

Siegert, LLC 

One North Franklin Street, lOth Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

(312) 726-3800 Tel. 

(312) 726-3818 Fax 

jhoff@cremerspina.com 

j schneider@cremerspina.com 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 14, 2016, I have sent by U.S. Post, the original and one 

(I) copy of the forgoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20594 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilber Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

In addition, I hereby certify that on September 14, 2016, I have sent by U.S. Post and via 

facsimile, a copy of the foregoing document to the following: 

#37381 

Kate Barber, Esq. 

Enforcement Division, Midwest Team 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

kate.barber@faa.gov 

Fax: (847) 294-7498 

Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofT ransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-31 0) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

3 

Jared
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-08559, 333-35237, 333-41137, 333-56340 and
333-72864) of our report dated February 9, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of InVision Technologies, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Jose, California
March 7, 2002

---

QuickLinks
- 2452
- 2453
- 2454
#### § 111.40-13 Rating.

Each panelboard must have a current rating not less than the feeder circuit capacity.