alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert R. Gerber, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


          1.   The Report  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


September 27, 2002                          /s/ Robert R. Gerber
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Robert R. Gerber
                                          Vice President, Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


**Pursuant
      to 18 United States Code Section 1350**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
      year
      ended December 31, 2004 of PowerCerv Corporation (the "Company") filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Company.








/s/
                John D Stanton
              
              John
                D Stanton
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              August
                22, 2005




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PowerCerv Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0608

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KAYLA DAWN PENNINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until June 20, 2022, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 17 2022

05/17/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0608
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005**

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business Inc. (“Issuer”) for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):

|   | (a).   | fully complies with the   requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of   1934; and                                          |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (b).   | the information contained   in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

          This Certification is executed as of November, 2005.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|   | /s/  Henry M. Baroco |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | Henry M. Baroco           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

                    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined to renew again for a period of two years its advisory committee designated as the “Agricultural Advisory Committee.”                           ( print page 15117)                        The Commission certifies that the renewal of the advisory committee is in the public interest in connection with duties imposed on the Commission by the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1,                     *et seq.*

The objectives and scope of activities of the Agricultural Advisory Committee are to conduct public meetings and submit reports and recommendations on issues affecting agricultural producers, processors, lenders and others interested in or affected by agricultural commodities markets, and to facilitate communications between the Commission and the diverse agricultural and agriculture-related organizations represented on the Committee. The Committee's membership represents a cross-section of interested and affected groups including representatives of producers, processors, lenders and other interested agricultural groups.

Interested persons may obtain information or make comments by writing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27, 2007, by the Commission.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1573 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                       166
<INVENTORY>                                     56,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,299
<PP&E>                                          49,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,907)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,032
<SALES>                                        282,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               294,334
<CGS>                                          194,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  272,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,787
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
# C_2009100EN.01013501.xml

| 30.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/135 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/135

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer (Recast)

COM(2008) 505 final — 2008/0165 (COD)

COM(2008) 505 final — 2008/0165 (COD)

2009/C 100/23

On 30 September 2008 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer (Recast)

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer (Recast)

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion, adopted on 2 December 1998 (1), it decided, at its 448th plenary session, held on 21, 22 and 23 October 2008 (meeting of 22 October), by 119 votes with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.

1

Brussels, 22 October 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on substances that deplete the ozone layer (OJ C 40 of 15.2.1999, p. 34).

1

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2178 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 

Import and Export Act to eliminate certain mandatory minimum penalties relating to crack cocaine offenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled 

Substances Import and Export Act to eliminate certain 

mandatory minimum penalties relating to crack cocaine 

offenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crack-Cocaine Equi5 table Sentencing Act of 2009’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2178 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATING CRACK AND OTHER FORMS OF COCAINE 

2 THE SAME FOR TRAFFICKING PENALTIES. 

3 (a) TREATING 50 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS

4 50 GRAMS OF OTHER FORMS OF COCAINE.—Section 

5 401(b)(1)(A) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

6 841(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking clause (iii). 

7 (b) TREATING 5 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS 5 

8 GRAMS OF OTHER FORMS OF COCAINE.—Section 

9 401(b)(1)(B) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

10 841(b)(1)(B)) is amended by striking clause (iii). 

11 SEC. 3. TREATING THE POSSESSION OF CRACK THE SAME 

12 AS THE POSSESSION OF OTHER FORMS OF 

13 COCAINE. 

14 Section 404(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

15 U.S.C. 844(a)) is amended by striking the sentence that 

16 begins ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence’’. 

17 SEC. 4. TREATING THE IMPORTATION OF CRACK THE SAME 

18 AS THE IMPORTATION OF OTHER FORMS OF 

19 COCAINE. 

20 (a) TREATING 50 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS

21 50 GRAMS OF OTHER FORMS OF COCAINE.—Section 

22 1010(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Import and Ex23 port Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(1)) is amended by striking out 

24 subparagraph (C). 

25 (b) TREATING 5 GRAMS OF CRACK THE SAME AS 5 

26 GRAMS OF OTHER FORMS OF COCAINE.—Section 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2178 IH

1 1010(b)(2) of the Controlled Substances Import and Ex2 port Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(2)) is amended by striking out 

3 subparagraph (C). 

4 SEC. 5. SENTENCING COMMISSION TO AMEND GUIDELINES. 

5 As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, the United States Sentencing Commission 

7 shall promulgate such amendments to the Sentencing 

8 Guidelines as are necessary to conform those Guidelines 

9 to the amendments made by this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### F. May Teeter, *Respondent, v.*George D. Gilson, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, witli costs. Opinion by

Bookes, J.
§ 133.145 Marine evacuation system launching arrangements. ( a ) *Arrangements.* Each marine evacuation system must have the following arrangements: ( 1 ) Each marine evacuation system must be capable of being deployed by one person.
( 2 ) Each marine evacuation system must enable the total number of persons for which it is designed, to be transferred from the OSV into the inflated liferafts within a period of 10 minutes from the time an abandon-ship signal is given.
( 3 ) Each marine evacuation system must be arranged so that liferafts may be securely attached to the platform and released from the platform by a person either in the liferaft or on the platform.
( 4 ) Each marine evacuation system must be capable of being deployed from the OSV under unfavorable conditions of trim of up to 10 degrees either way and of list of up to 20 degrees either way.
( 5 ) If the marine evacuation system has an inclined slide, the angle of the slide from horizontal must be within a range of 30 to 35 degrees when the OSV is upright and in the lightest seagoing condition.
( 6 ) Each marine evacuation system platform must be capable of being restrained by a bowsing line or other positioning system that is designed to deploy automatically, and if necessary, be capable of being adjusted to the position required for evacuation.
( b ) *Stowage.* Each marine evacuation system must be stowed as follows: ( 1 ) There must not be any openings between the marine evacuation system's embarkation station and the OSV's side at the OSV's waterline in the lightest seagoing condition.
( 2 ) The marine evacuation system's launching positions must be arranged, as far as practicable, to be straight down the OSV's side and safely clear the propeller and any steeply overhanging positions of the hull.
( 3 ) The marine evacuation system must be protected from any projections of the OSV's structure or equipment.
( 4 ) The marine evacuation system's passage and platform, when deployed; its stowage container; and its operational arrangement must not interfere with the operation of any other lifesaving appliance at any other launching station.
( 5 ) Where appropriate, the marine evacuation system's stowage area must be protected from damage by heavy seas.
( c ) *Stowage of associated liferafts.* Inflatable liferafts used in conjunction with the marine evacuation system must be stowed as follows: ( 1 ) Each inflatable liferaft used in conjunction with the marine evacuation system must be close to the system container, but capable of dropping clear of the deployed chute and boarding platform.
( 2 ) Each inflatable liferaft used in conjunction with the marine evacuation system must be capable of individual release from its stowage rack.
( 3 ) Each inflatable liferaft used in conjunction with the marine evacuation system must be stowed in accordance with § 133.130.
( 4 ) Each inflatable liferaft used in conjunction with the marine evacuation system must be provided with preconnected or easily connected retrieving lines to the platform.
§ 147A.41 Person in charge of fumigation; flammable fumigants. ( a ) The person in charge of fumigation shall ensure that: ( 1 ) Before the space that is to be fumigated is sealed, it is thoroughly cleaned, and all refuse, oily waste, and other combustible material is removed;
( 2 ) Before fumigation, all fire fighting equipment, including sprinklers and fire pumps, is in operating condition; and
( 3 ) Before and during fumigation, electrical circuits that are in the space that is fumigated are de-energized.
( b ) [Reserved]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1868 

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 

those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals 

and citizens of the United States at birth. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. DEAL of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN

of California, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. JONES, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. 

BROUN of Georgia, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. 

HELLER, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. 

WHITFIELD, Mr. LINDER, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. 

HERGER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

CALVERT, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. COFFMAN

of Colorado, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. 

FOXX, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. POE of Texas, and Mr. 

PRICE of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the 

United States who are nationals and citizens of the 

United States at birth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1868 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Birthright Citizenship 

3 Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CERTAIN PERSONS 

5 BORN IN THE UNITED STATES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 301 of the Immigration 

7 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401) is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

9 ‘‘The following’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (a) through (h) 

11 as paragraphs (1) through (8); and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—Acknowledging the right of birth14 right citizenship established by section 1 of the 14th 

15 amendment to the Constitution, a person born in the 

16 United States shall be considered ‘subject to the jurisdic17 tion’ of the United States for purposes of subsection (a)(1) 

18 if the person is born in the United States of parents, one 

19 of whom is— 

20 ‘‘(1) a citizen or national of the United States; 

21 ‘‘(2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

22 residence in the United States whose residence is in 

23 the United States; or 

24 ‘‘(3) an alien performing active service in the 

25 armed forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, 

26 United States Code).’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1868 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a)(3) shall not be construed to affect the citizen3 ship or nationality status of any person born before the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
SUPREME COURT.

#### J. H. Bullard agt. A. H. Pearsall.

*Third Department, Albany General*Term,

January, 1874.

The successful party is not entitled to a double *UU of costs*on two appeals to the general term in the same case.

The plaintiff moved for a new trial at the special term, founded upon a case and affidavits showing' surprise and newly discovered evidence, which was denied. The plaintiff appealed from that order to the general term before judgment. Two days after that appeal the defendant entered judgment for costs. The plaintiff then appealed from the judgment to the general term. The two appeals were contained in the same printed case and were argued together at the general term, and one decision was made affirming the judgment and order appealed from. Upon this decision the defendant claimed $100 costs on each appeal. The clerk of Saratoga county allowed both, and upon appeal to judge Ingalls he granted an order striking out one of the bills. The defendant appealed from that order to the general term, which court affirmed the order. This question has heretofore been controverted in the courts. From cases reported it appears that three judges of the superior court of Mew Fork have decided that in such a case the successful party is entitled to a double bill of costs, and that the same number of supreme court judges have held that he is only entitled to a single bill. This decision of the general term settles the question for this department. The appeal was argued by J. P. Butler *for the appellant*and E. F. Bullard *for the respondent.*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40358

Conference Calendar

LLOYD E. BURRUSS,

Movant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:04-CV-275

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Lloyd E. Burruss, Texas prisoner # 864554, appeals the

denial of his motion to intervene in the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit

filed by fellow prisoner John Lee Newman. Newman’s suit was

subsequently dismissed, as was his appeal of the judgment of

dismissal. Because the lawsuit in which Burruss sought to

intervene is no longer pending, this appeal is moot. See Willy

v. Administrative Review Board, 423 F.3d 483, 494 n.50 (5th Cir.

2005). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.