alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,844
<PP&E>                                          13,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (26,836)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,009
<SALES>                                         27,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,650
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3(K)


                           The CIT Group/
                           Credit Finance
                           1211 Avenue of the Americas
                           New York, NY  10036
                           Tel   212 790-9100
                           Fax   212 790-9123

         THE
         CIT
         GROUP
                                                              April 11, 2000
ICC INDUSTRIES INC.
460 Park Avenue
New York, New York  10022

                   Re:  Pharmaceutical Formulations, Inc.
                        (the "Borrower")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the Limited Guaranty executed by you, the Guarantor, in
favor of the Lender (which as of January 1, 2000 is the CIT Group/Business
Credit, Inc. as successor by merger to The CIT Group/Credit Finance, Inc.) dated
April 1, 1999 (the "Guaranty"), whereby you guaranteed the Obligations of the
Borrower owing to Lender limited to $1,500,000.00 plus interest, costs and
expenses (as further defined therein). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the same meanings given them in the Guaranty.

This letter is to confirm that pursuant to mutual consent and understanding your
maximum liability under the Guaranty shall be and hereby is increased to
$2,000,000.00 in the aggregate plus interest thereon at the then applicable rate
provided in the Financing Agreement, plus any and all costs and expenses of
collection hereunder, including, without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees
and legal expenses.

Except as herein specifically provided, the Guaranty remains in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms and no other changes in the terms or
provisions of the Guaranty is intended or implied. If you are in agreement with
the foregoing, please so indicate by signing and returning to us the enclosed
copy of this letter.

                                Very truly yours,

                                THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.
                                As successor by merger to
                                The CIT Group/Credit Finance, Inc.

                                By:  /S/ Andrew S. Housspiegel
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Title: Vice President

Read and Agreed to:

ICC INDUSTRIES INC.



By:  /S/ JOHN L. ORAM
     ______________________________
Title:  President
§ 50.4 Waivers for research. In determining whether to request a waiver for an Exchange Visitor engaged in the conduct of research, the Board considers the following key factors: ( a ) The program or activity at the applicant institution or organization in which the Exchange Visitor is employed must be of high priority and of national or international significance in an area of interest to the Department.
( b ) The Exchange Visitor must be needed as an integral part of the program or activity, or of an essential component thereof, so that loss of his/her services would necessitate discontinuance of the program, or a major phase of it. Specific evidence must be provided on how the loss or unavailability of the individual's services would adversely affect the initiation, continuance, completion, or success of the program or activity. The applicant organization/institution must clearly demonstrate that a suitable replacement for the Exchange Visitor cannot be found through recruitment or any other means. The Board will not request a waiver when the principal problem appears to be one of administrative, budgetary, or program inconvenience to the institution or other employer.
( c ) The Exchange Visitor must possess outstanding qualifications, training and experience well beyond the usually expected accomplishments at the graduate, postgraduate, and residency levels, and must clearly demonstrate the capability to make original and significant contributions to the program. The Board will not request a waiver simply because an individual has specialized training or experience or is occupying a senior staff position in a university, hospital, or other institution.
[67 FR 77696, Dec. 19, 2002]
#### § 95.601 Scope and applicability.

This subpart prescribes part of the conditions under which the Department of Health and Human Services will approve the Federal Financial Participation (FFP) at the applicable rates for the costs of automated data processing incurred under an approved State plan for titles IV-B, IV-D, IV-E, XIX or XXI of the Social Security Act. The conditions of approval of this subpart add to the statutory and regulatory requirements for acquisition of Automated Data Processing (ADP) equipment and services under the specified titles of the Social Security Act.

[75 FR 66336, Oct. 28, 2010]
Document

Exhibit 10.8

ADDENDUM TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Ross Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) and Michael Balmuth (the “Executive”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby enter into this Addendum to the Executive Employment Agreement entered into by the Parties effective June 1, 2012 and most recently amended as of July 13, 2019, and any subsequent renewal of such agreement (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), and agree for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, as follows:


1. This Addendum is effective as of April 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).  
2. Notwithstanding Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement to the contrary, for the period beginning on the Effective Date and continuing until the date on which the Company determines, in its sole discretion, that at least fifty percent (50%) of the Company’s stores closed as of the Effective Date due to the COVID-19 health pandemic have fully reopened, Executive’s current gross salary shall be decreased by one hundred percent (100%).  
3. This Addendum may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement.  A signed copy of this Addendum delivered by facsimile, e-mail, electronic signature, or other means of electronic transmission (including scan or .PDF) shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Addendum.
4. Except as otherwise amended by this Addendum, all provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  The Employment Agreement, as modified by this Addendum, represents the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements or understandings between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Addendum shall form a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have knowingly and voluntarily executed this Addendum as of the dates set forth below:




															
	ROSS STORES, INC.			EXECUTIVE	
					
	/s/George P. Orban			/s/Michael Balmuth	
					
	Name:	George P. Orban		Name:	Michael Balmuth
					
	Dated:	3/31/2020		Dated:	3/31/2020
#### § 98.34 Parental rights and responsibilities.

Nothing under this part shall be construed or applied in any manner to infringe on or usurp the moral and legal rights and responsibilities of parents or legal guardians.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7789

DONNA MARIE ZAHID,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA HUFFMAN; D. PARRISH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-2-1035-7)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donna Marie Zahid, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donna Marie Zahid appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Zahid v. Huffman, No. CA2-1035-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                       HEALTH SYSTEMS DESIGN CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            1998          1997           1996
                                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------
<S>                                                                     <C>           <C>            <C>
Net loss..............................................................  $   (839,085) $  (3,856,304) $  (1,207,946)
                                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------
                                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
  Basic...............................................................     6,588,842      6,478,789      5,656,418
                                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------
  Diluted.............................................................     6,588,842      6,478,789      5,656,418
                                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted..........................  $      (0.13) $       (0.60) $       (0.22)
                                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------
</TABLE>
§ 411.91 Medical and mental health assessments; history of sexual abuse. ( a ) If the assessment pursuant to § 411.41 indicates that a UC experienced prior sexual victimization or perpetrated sexual abuse, the care provider facility must ensure that the UC is immediately referred to a qualified medical or mental health practitioner for medical and/or mental health follow-up as appropriate. Care provider facility staff must also ensure that all UCs disclosures are reported in accordance with these standards.
( b ) When a referral for medical follow-up is initiated, the care provider facility must ensure that the UC receives a health evaluation no later than seventy-two (72) hours after the referral.
( c ) When a referral for mental health follow-up is initiated, the care provider facility must ensure that the UC receives a mental health evaluation no later than seventy-two (72) hours after the referral.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 72 FR 10530, 
Thursday, March 8, 2007.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Thursday, March 15, 
2007, 1 p.m. (Eastern Time).

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The meeting has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen Llewellyn, Acting 
Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Seretariat.
[FR Doc. 07-1340 Filed 3-15-07; 2:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-06-M
#### § 90.1 What is the purpose of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975?

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, is designed to prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act also permits federally assisted programs or activities, and recipients of Federal funds, to continue to use certain age distinctions and factors other than age which meet the requirements of the Act and these regulations.

[44 FR 33776, June 12, 1979, as amended at 70 FR 24321, May 9, 2005]
NO. 07-08-0414-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 10, 2008

______________________________

GEORGE CHAPMAN AND KAREN CHAPMAN, APPELLANTS

v.

ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYDS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 57,624-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON MOTION TO DISMISS

	Appellants George and Karen Chapman filed a motion to dismiss their appeal on December 8, 2008.  The motion includes a certificate of conference indicating appellee Allstate Texas Lloyds is not opposed to the motion.

	The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  The motion does not indicate an agreement of the parties with regard to the distribution of costs of the appeal.  We therefore tax costs of the appeal against appellants.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).  

	Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

	James T. Campbell

	Justice
§ 11.459 Requirements for national endorsement as master or mate on rivers. ( a ) An applicant for an endorsement as master of river self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage must meet the same service requirements as master of inland self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage.
( b ) An applicant for an endorsement as master or mate of river self-propelled vessels, with a limitation of 25 to 1,600 GRT, must meet the same service requirements as those required by this subpart for the corresponding tonnage Great Lakes and inland self-propelled endorsement. Service on the Great Lakes is not, however, required.
§ 2551.73 May a Senior Companion serve as a volunteer leader? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Yes. Senior Companions—who on the basis of experience as volunteers, special skills, and demonstrated leadership abilities—may spend time, in addition to their regular assignment, to assist newer Senior Companion volunteers in performing their assignments and in coordinating activities of such volunteers. ( a ) All Senior Companions serving as volunteer leaders shall receive a written volunteer assignment plan developed by the volunteer station that: ( 1 ) Is approved by the sponsor and accepted by the Senior Companion;
( 2 ) Identifies the role and activities of the Senior Companion and expected outcomes;
( 3 ) Addresses the period of time of service; and
( 4 ) Is used to review the status of the Senior Companion's services identified in the assignment plan, as well as the impact of those services.
( b ) While serving in the capacity of a volunteer leader, a Senior Companion may be paid a stipend (at the same rate as the established Senior Companion stipend) for his or her additional hours served as a volunteer leader.
( c ) Senior Companion leaders, through recognition, may receive an additional monetary incentive.
[83 FR 64647, Dec. 17, 2018]
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Prygelski, III,
Chief Financial Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      21st
      Century Holding Company.





By:  /s/ Peter J. Prygelski,
      IIIPeter
      J. Prygelski, III, Chief Financial Officer
              May
      11, 2009
§ 705.8 Appeal of an initial adverse agency determination. ( a ) Any individual whose request for access or for a correction or amendment that has been denied, in whole or in part, by the General Counsel may appeal that decision to the Staff Director of the Commission, 624 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20425, or to a designee of the Staff Director.
( b ) The appeal shall be in writing and shall: ( 1 ) Name the individual making the appeal;
( 2 ) Identify the record sought to be amended or corrected;
( 3 ) Name the record system in which that record is contained;
( 4 ) Contain a short statement describing the amendment or correction sought; and
( 5 ) State the name of the person who initially denied the correction or amendment.
( c ) Not later than thirty (30) working days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the date on which the agency received the appeal, the Staff Director shall complete his or her review of the appeal and make a final decision thereon, unless, for good cause shown, the Staff Director extends the appeal period beyond the initial thirty (30) day appeal period. In the event of such an extension, the Staff Director shall promptly notify the individual making the appeal that the period for a final decision has been extended.
( d ) After review of an appeal request, the Staff Director will send a written notice to the requester containing the following information: ( 1 ) The decision; and if the denial is upheld, the reasons for the decision;
( 2 ) The right of the requester to institute a civil action in a Federal District Court for judicial review of the decision if the appeal is denied; and
( 3 ) The right of the requester to file with the Commission a concise statement setting forth the reasons for his or her disagreement with the Commission's decision denying the request. The Commission shall make this statement available to any person to whom the record is later disclosed together with a brief statement, if the Commission considers it appropriate, of the agency's reasons for denying the requested correction or amendment. These statements shall also be provided to all prior recipients of the record to the extent that it is relevant to the information previously furnished to a recipient pursuant to the Privacy Act.
§ 410.1207 Ninety (90)-day review of pending sponsor applications. ( a ) ORR supervisory staff who supervise field staff shall conduct an automatic review of all pending sponsor applications. The first automatic review shall occur within 90 days of an unaccompanied child entering ORR custody to identify and resolve in a timely manner the reasons that a sponsor application remains pending and to determine possible steps to accelerate the unaccompanied child's safe release.
( b ) Upon completion of the initial 90-day review, unaccompanied child case managers or other designated agency or care provider staff shall update the potential sponsor and unaccompanied child on the status of the case, explaining the reasons that the release process is incomplete. Case managers or other designated agency or care provider staff shall work with the potential sponsor, relevant stakeholders, and ORR to address the portions of the sponsor application that remain unresolved.
( c ) For cases that are not resolved after the initial 90-day review, ORR supervisory staff who supervise field staff shall conduct additional reviews as provided in § 410.1207(a) at least every 90 days until the pending sponsor application is resolved. ORR may in its discretion and subject to resource availability conduct additional reviews on a more frequent basis than every 90 days.
§ 205.130 State financial participation. State plan requirements: ( a ) A State plan for financial assistance under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Social Security Act must provide that: ( 1 ) State (as distinguished from local) funds will be used in both assistance and administration; and
( 2 ) State and Federal funds will be apportioned among the political subdivisions of the State on a basis consistent with equitable treatment of individuals in similar circumstances throughout the State.
( b ) A State plan under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Act must provide further that State funds will be used to pay a substantial part of the total costs of the assistance programs.
[45 FR 56686, Aug. 25, 1980]