alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

IDT CORPORATION

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of IDT Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for fiscal 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, James A. Courter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: October 15, 2007 
|                       
|/s/ James A. Courter   
|James A. Courter       
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDT Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, Unite d 1 

### States District Court for the District of Nebraska. Although Stout has served her prison sentence, this appeal is 2 

### not moot because she is still serving her term of supervise d release. See United States v. Chavez-Pa lacios , 30 F.3d 1290, 1293 (10th Cir. 1994); McClain v. Bureau of Prisons , 9 F.3d 503, 50 5 (6th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); United States v. Smith , 991 F.2 d 1468, 1470 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Huang , 977 F.2d 540, 542 n.1 (11th Cir. 1992) (per curiam).



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2795

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska Kathy J. Stout, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 1997 Filed: March 20, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges
.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kathy J. Stout, a Native American, appeals her three-month sentence imposed by

the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska 1 after she pleaded guilty to theft of federal funds, in violation of 1 8 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A). Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v
. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For the reasons discussed below, w e affirm. 2

### -2- St out argues that the district court impermissibly considered rac e as a f actor in her sentence, as evidenced by its statement tha t impris onment was required "for other people at the reservation an d throughout the state of Nebraska to know that when you steal $27,000 of th e federal government's money, you're going to jail for it for a while." In support of her appeal, Stout relies on United States v. Onwu emene , 933 F.2d 650, 651-52 (8th Cir. 1991) (reference to alien status constitute d incorrect application of guidelines and violation of due process). We fin d Onwuemene distinguish able. Here, the district court did not specifically address Stout's race or her particular status as a Native American; rather , the court discussed i n general terms the need to impose imprisonment as a deterrent to show people both in the reservation and throughout Nebraska that s tealing government property has severe consequences. Thus, w e conclude that, takingthe district court's comments in context, the court did not impermissibly consider Stout's Native American status in imposing the three-month sentence. Having ca refully reviewed the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 79.36 Post-hearing briefs.

The ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ shall fix the time for filing such briefs, not to exceed 60 days from the date the party receives the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
#### ALBERT HEIMROTH, PLAINTIFF, v. SAMUEL R. WALSH, DEFENDANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided October 21, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

*915Eor the rule, *Frank Turner.*

Contra, *James D. Carton.*

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff was in the Fenimore Hotel, Asbury Park, for the purpose of making repairs. The defendant was the lessee of the hotel and it was open for and doing business.

Plaintiff, in going about his work of examining for repairs necessary to be made, having occasion to go to the roof, attempted to enter the passenger elevator at the first floor. The door was open. He stepped in and fell down the shaft, the elevator cage not being at that floor. He received injuries for which he sued and has a verdict for $20,000.

This verdict we are asked to set aside because the defendant was guilty of contributory negligence, because it is against the charge of the court, because it is against the weight of evidence and because prejudicial error was commited in admitting certain evidence.

We conclude that none of these grounds is so substantial as to warrant us in setting aside the verdict.

The rule is therefore discharged.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                      JOINT CO-CEO/CFO CERTIFICATE REQUIRED

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Each of the undersigned, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Chief
Financial Officer of Coolbrands International Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Company's report on Form 40-F for
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, (the "Annual Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   January 18, 2005


                                               /s/ David J. Stein
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               David J. Stein
                                               Co-Chief Executive Officer

                                               /s/ Richard E. Smith
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Richard E. Smith
                                               Co-Chief Executive Officer

                                               /s/ Gary P. Stevens
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Gary P. Stevens
                                               Chief Financial Officer