alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, ZEB1 OSR-C (A1) S (LRP).
    Date: May 18, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 220 small conference room, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Prabha L. Atreya, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD 20892; (301) 
496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3829791869a829391a38e828a8fcd8d8a8bcd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="18796c6a7d6179686a587579717436767170367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1510 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, C. Leo Smith, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of International
Imaging Systems, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.

         4.       I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5.       I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which hare reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.

                                        /s/ C. LEO SMITH
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        C. Leo Smith
                                        Chief Executive and Chief Financial
                                        Officer

November 15, 2005

                                     - 19 -
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2016AT 10:00A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2016-20: Christoph Mlinarchik, JD, CFCM 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2016-21: Great America PAC 

Proposed Amendments to Directive 52 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Utah Republican Party (A13-16) 

2016 Legislative Recommendations 

Management and Administrative Matters 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shelley E. Garr, 

Deputy Secretary, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220 

Signed: 

Shelley E. Garr 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

SUBMITIED: NOVEMBER 23, 2016
#### Annie Lynch et al., Respondents, *v.*John D. Lyons, as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Donnelly, Jr., Deceased, Appellant.

*Lynch*v. *Lyons,*131 App. Div. 120, affirmed.

(Submitted January 14, 1910;

decided January 28, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 17, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover upon promissory notes.

*Henry Willis Smith*and *George H. Smith*for appellant.

*William McCauley*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with "costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.
Belknap,

No. 5346. No. 5347.

#### Elizabeth L. Noyes & *a. v.*Henry J. Labrecque & *a.*

Argued June 1, 1965.

Decided June 30, 1965.

*358*Snierson & Chandler {Mr. John*P., *Chandler*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*JVighswander, Lord, Botones Se Martin {Mr. Hugh H. Botones*orally), for the defendants.

Biandin, J.

These are two actions of case brought under RSA 466:19 for the recovery of damages arising from an accident wherein the plaintiff and his wife Elizabeth were injured and the motorcycle on which they were riding damaged when the defendants’ dog ran out into the street in front of them. The plaintiffs allege no negligence of the defendants, but claim they are entitled to recovery under section 19, supra, which reads as follows: “Any person to whom or to whose property damage may be occasioned by a dog not owned or kept by him shall be entitled to recover such damage of the person who owns or keeps the dog, or has it in possession, unless the damage was occasioned to him while he was engaged in the commission of a trespass or other tort.”

The defendants contend that section 19 created no new cause of action but merely relieved the plaintiffs of the burden of proving that the defendants- knew that their dog had “vicious propensities.” They say that section 19 must be construed with section 20, which says: “Every owner or keeper of a dog shall forfeit, to any person injured by it, double the amount of damages sustained by him, to be recovered in an action on the case.”

In short, the defendants’ position is that the statute does not apply and that therefore the plaintiffs must prove negligence as at common law. *Wike*v. Allison, 105 N. H. 393; Restatement, Torts, *ss.*509, 518.

Although RSA 466:19, 20 suggest no qualifications to absolute liability of owners or keepers of dogs for the damage done by them save those expressed therein *(Raymond*v. *Bujold,*89 N. H. 380) yet the reason for the enactment of the statute was undoubtedly to “obviate the difficulty of showing the owner’s knowledge of the vicious propensities of the dog as required at common law. *Orne*v. Roberts, 51 N. H. 110; *McIntire*v. *Plaisted,*57 N. H. 606, 609. But it does not confer a right of action on all persons indiscriminately.” *Gagnon*v. Frank, 83 N. H. 122, 123. As the court in the same case further observed, “This statute is to be given a reasonable interpretation.” *Id.,*123. We believe that under a reasonable interpretation the statute and particularly *359the double damages provision (5. 20) were not intended to cover a situation where no vicious or mischievous acts by the dog were alleged.

The conclusions reached render unnecessary discussion of other issues raised and the order is

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
#### First National Bank of Sutton, appellee, v. Fred Schiermeyer et al., appellants.

Filed April 15, 1916.

No. 18382.

1. Trial: Direction of Verdict: Special Findings. In an action at law the trial court is not required to make special findings when directing the verdict of the jury.

2. -: -. There being no evidence which would support a verdict for defendant, the trial court did not err in instructing the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff.

Appeal from the district court for Thayer county: Leslie G. Hurd, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Morning &*Ledkoith, *C. L. Richards*and *Weiss &*Weiss, for appellants.

*W. E.*Goodhue, *M. L. Corey*and *Moclcett &*Peterson, *contra.*

*705Sedgwick, J.

This action was upon a promissory note, and the defense was that the note was given for a hay baler, which was warranted, and was not as warranted. The court instructed the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff, which was done, and judgment accordingly, and defendants have appealed.

The first objection is that the court erred in not stating the ground of the ruling. It is generally necessary in moving for an instructed verdict to- state the ground of the motion for the information of tile court. Under some circumstances it has been held that unless the ground of the motion is stated no error can be predicated upon refusal of .the motion. When the motion is based upon the failure of evidence, it is generally held that the point relied upon must be specified. *Yeager v. South Dakota C. R. Co.,*31 S. Dak. 304. The statute does not require special findings in an action of this kind.

The contract of warranty contained provisions for furnishing defective parts, and similar provisions, but there is no claim of evidence of failure of the company in these respects.

The contract provided: “The Luebben Baler Co. guarantees that when baler is run 150 revolutions per minute of its drive shaft, and the carrier is kept full of hay spread uniformly, it will bale three tons per hour, and the capacity will be increased with the increased speed of the baler.” The defendants testified: “Q„ You may state how the baler worked. A. Well, the hay in the stack, it was really damp, and it wouldn’t go through the rollers at all, and it would clog up on the spindles and it would run up onto the belt so we couldn’t do hardly anything with it, and they had put on a new spreader and it wouldn’t work on there either, so finally we raised the spreader up, and stood there with forks and spread the hay with the forks on the feeder.” Other similar testimony is quoted in the brief of defendant. No evidence is referred to in the brief which tends to *706show that the baler was run as specified in the warranty, or that it was ever satisfactorily tried with hay suitable for the purpose. There is quite a volume of evidence, and we have not observed evidence tending to prove that the haler failed upon a fair trial as contemplated by the contract. As no substantial failure of the warranty appears, it is immaterial whether the plaintiff is a *bona, fide*holder of the paper under the negotiable instruments law.

The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Letton J., not sitting.
§ 162.1502 Standards for enrollment and disenrollment in a health plan transaction. The Secretary adopts the following standards for enrollment and disenrollment in a health plan transaction. ( a ) For the period from October 16, 2003 through March 16, 2009: ASC X12N 834—Benefit Enrollment and Maintenance, Version 4010, May 2000, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X095 and Addenda to Benefit Enrollment and Maintenance, Version 4010, October 2002, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X095A1. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920.)
( b ) For the period from March 17, 2009 through December 31, 2011, both: ( 1 ) The standard identified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) The ASC X12 Standards for Electronic Data Interchange Technical Report Type 3—Benefit Enrollment and Maintenance (834), August 2006, ASC X12N/005010X220 (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920)
( c ) For the period on and after January 1, 2012, the standard identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
[74 FR 3327, Jan. 16, 2009]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Graphics Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Fred Drasner, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                   /s/ FRED DRASNER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                       Fred Drasner
                                                  Chairman of the Board
                                               and Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1936 

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 

facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. HALL of New York, and Mr. HINCHEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of 

commercial nuclear facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Power Licens5 ing Reform Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

8 U.S.C. 2133) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection b., by inserting ‘‘, including 

10 that the facility does not pose an unreasonable 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1936 IH

1 threat to persons or the environment because of 

2 safety or security vulnerabilities (including vulner3 ability to terrorist attacks), and that there exist ade4 quate evacuation plans for emergency events and 

5 that those plans have been approved by the relevant 

6 Federal agencies and States within 50 miles of the 

7 facility’’ after ‘‘by rule establish’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection c., by adding at the end the 

9 following: ‘‘Any such renewal shall be subject to the 

10 same criteria and requirements that would be appli11 cable for an original application for initial construc12 tion, and the Commission shall ensure that any 

13 changes in the size or distribution of the sur14 rounding population have not resulted in the facility 

15 being located at a site at which a new facility would 

16 not be allowed to be built.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 14, 2021

NO. 03-20-00556-CV

Emergency Services of Texas, P.A.; Hill Country Emergency Medical Associates, P.A.; 

Longhorn Emergency Medicine Associates, P.A.;, ACS Primary Care Physicians 

Southwest, P.A.; Longhorn Observation Medical Associates, P.A.; Central Texas 

Emergency Associates, P.A.; Texas Medicine Resources, LLP; Texas Physician Resources, 

LLP; and Pediatric Emergency Medicine Group, LLP, Appellants

v.

Celtic Insurance Company; and Superior Health Plan, Inc., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 27, 2020. The parties 

have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court 

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses

the appeal. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in

the court below.
SERVED: OCTOBER26, 2015
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
APPLICATION OF SPIRIT AVIONICS, LTD. For fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-3309

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (arising from civilpenaltyproceeding DocketNo. FAA-2014-0119) has been assignedto Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing**~----------** ..

Attachment-Service ListDocketNo. FAA-2015-3309 (Equal Access to Justice Act) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001

Ms. Kate Barber 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 2300 East DevonAvenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAJ(: 847-294-7498
Mr. Jerry A. Eichenberger 

### Respondent's Counsel EICHENBERGER & ASSOCIATES 6037 Frantz Road, Suite 107 Dublin, OH 43017 TEL: 614-798-1600 FAJ(: 614-798-1620 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAJ(: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY Ms. Lauren Hoysen 

### Complainant's Co-Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 FAX: 847-294-7498 FAX: 847-294-7498
Mr. Patrick J. Moro 

### Respondent's Co-Counsel EICHENBERGER & ASSOCIATES 6037 Frantz Road, Suite 107 Dublin, OH 43017 TEL: 614-798-1600 FAX: 614-798-1620

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Cierk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
§ 98.70 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Quarterly Case-level Report— ( 1 ) State and territorial Lead Agencies that receive assistance under the CCDF shall prepare and submit to the Department, in a manner specified by the Secretary, a quarterly case-level report of monthly family case-level data. Data shall be collected monthly and submitted quarterly. States may submit the data monthly if they choose to do so.
( 2 ) The information shall be reported for the three-month federal fiscal period preceding the required report. The first report shall be submitted no later than August 31, 1998, and quarterly thereafter. The first report shall include data from the third quarter of FFY 1998 (April 1998 through June 1998). States and Territorial Lead Agencies which choose to submit case-level data monthly must submit their report for April 1998 no later than July 30, 1998. Following reports must be submitted every thirty days thereafter.
( 3 ) State and territorial Lead Agencies choosing to submit data based on a sample shall submit a sampling plan to ACF for approval 60 days prior to the submission of the first quarterly report. States are not prohibited from submitting case-level data for the entire population receiving CCDF services.
( 4 ) Quarterly family case-level reports to the Secretary shall include the information listed in § 98.71(a).
( b ) Annual Report— ( 1 ) State and territorial Lead Agencies that receive assistance under CCDF shall prepare and submit to the Secretary an annual report. The report shall be submitted, in a manner specified by the Secretary, by December 31 of each year and shall cover the most recent federal fiscal year (October through September).
( 2 ) The first annual aggregate report shall be submitted no later than December 31, 1997, and every twelve months thereafter.
( 3 ) Biennial reports to Congress by the Secretary shall include the information listed in § 98.71(b).
( c ) Tribal Annual Report— ( 1 ) Tribal Lead Agencies that receive assistance under CCDF shall prepare and submit to the Secretary an annual aggregate report.
( 2 ) The report shall be submitted in the manner specified by the Secretary by December 31 of each year and shall cover services for children and families served with CCDF funds during the preceding Federal Fiscal Year.
( 3 ) Biennial reports to Congress by the Secretary shall include the information listed in § 98.71(c).
( d ) State and territorial Lead Agencies shall make the following reports publicly available on a Web site in a timely manner: ( 1 ) Annual administrative data reports under paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) Quarterly financial reports under § 98.65(g); and
( 3 ) Annual quality progress reports under § 98.53(g).
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 67592, Sept. 30, 2016; 89 FR 52397, June 24, 2024]