alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Senate Floor Activity - Wednesday, March 12, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Wednesday, March 12)

S. 611

S. 1086

 S.Amdt. 2809

 S.Amdt. 2811

 S.Amdt. 2812

 72

 S.Amdt. 2813

 S.Amdt. 2814

 S.Amdt. 2818

 74

 S.Amdt. 2821

 S.Amdt. 2822

 73

 S.Amdt. 2824

 S.Amdt. 2837

S.Res. 365

## Executive Business (Wednesday, March 12)

PN1091

PN1139

PN1157

PN1162

PN1163

PN1181

 67

PN1200

 68

PN1201

 69

PN1202

 70

PN1204

 71

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
§ 500.2 Notice of entry or withdrawal of counsel in claims. ( a ) Counsel entering an appearance in a claim originally filed by a claimant in the claimant's own behalf, or upon request for a substitution of attorneys, will be required to file an authorization signed by the claimant.
( b ) When counsel seeks to withdraw from the prosecution of a claim, he or she will be required to demonstrate that the client (claimant) has been duly notified.
( c ) When a claimant advises the Commission that counsel no longer represents that claimant, a copy of the Commission's acknowledgment will be forwarded to that counsel.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with the annual report of Kelyniam Global, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the Period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Ketner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 
 Date:
March 11, 2008
 
 
 Kelyniam Global,
Inc.
 
 /S/ James
Ketner
 James
Ketner
 President/CEO/Chairman
 Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CSI Business Finance, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:May
                  19, 2006
              By:
              /s/ Timothy
                J
                ConnollyName:
              Timothy
                J ConnollyTitle:
              Chief
                  Executive Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to CSI Business Finance, Inc. and will be
      retained CSI Business Finance, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.0**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT					TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Accounting Officer of Scout Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:				1.    The annual report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.				Date: December 21, 2006				By: __/s/ Kathleen Scalzo__________________				Name:  Kathleen Scalzo				Title: President and Chief Executive Officer				Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

----
#### Sterling *v.*The State.

Submitted July 16,

Decided July 28, 1906.

Accusation of cheating, etc. Before Judge Freeman. City «court of Newnan. June 11, 1906.

*W. L. Stallings,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. Q. Post, solicitor,*contra.

•Cobb, P. J.

1. The gravamen of the offense defined by the act of 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 90), declaring it illegal for any person to procure money or other thing of value on a contract to perform services, with intent to defraud, is the fraudulent intent, which exists at the time of the advance, not to perform the services contracted for. *Lamar*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*312.

2. When, in a prosecution under the act above referred to, it appears from the evidence that a contract for services was made and money and other things of value were advanced to the servant who went to work under the contract, and thereafter a disagreement arose between the employer 1 and the servant as to the character of the work embraced in the contract, and as a result of this disagreement a quarrel arose between them ■•and the servant left the employer on account of threats of violence made by the employer, the presumption arising under the act that he procured the goods with fraudulent intent was overcome, and a verdict finding the defendant guilty was unauthorized.

*.Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
#### § 96.73 Sterilization.

If a State authorizes sterilization as a family planning service, it must comply with the provisions of 42 CFR part 441, subpart F, except that the State plan requirement under 42 CFR 441.252 does not apply.

[47 FR 33702, Aug. 4, 1982]
§ 108.570 Rescue boat embarkation, launching and recovery arrangements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76700 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) Each rescue boat must be capable of being launched with the unit making headway of 5 knots in calm water, or with the unit anchored or bearing on the bottom in a current of up to 5 knots. A painter may be used to meet this requirement.
( b ) Each rescue boat embarkation and launching arrangement must permit the rescue boat to be boarded and launched in the shortest possible time.
( c ) If the rescue boat is one of the unit's survival craft, the rescue boat must also be as follows: ( 1 ) The rescue boat must meet the embarkation arrangement and launching station requirements of § 108.540.
( 2 ) The rescue boat must meet the launching arrangement requirements of §§ 108.550 and 108.557, and if the launching arrangement uses falls and a winch, § 108.553.
( 3 ) If the launching arrangement uses a single fall, the rescue boat must have an automatic disengaging apparatus approved under approval series 160.170, instead of a lifeboat release mechanism.
( d ) Rapid recovery of the rescue boat must be possible when loaded with its full complement of persons and equipment. If the rescue boat is also a lifeboat, rapid recovery must be possible when loaded with its lifeboat equipment and an approved rescue boat complement of at least six persons.
( e ) Each rescue boat launching appliance must be fitted with a powered winch motor.
( f ) Each rescue boat launching appliance must be capable of hoisting the rescue boat when loaded with its full rescue boat complement of persons and equipment at a rate of not less than 0.3 meters per second (59 feet per minute).
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25291, May 20, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 52814, Oct. 1, 1998]
§ 11.474 National officer endorsements as ballast control operator. ( a ) To qualify for an endorsement as ballast control operator (BCO), an applicant must— ( 1 ) Present evidence of one of the following: ( i ) One year of employment assigned to MODUs, including at least 28 days of service as a trainee under the supervision of an individual holding a license or MMC endorsement as ballast control operator.
( ii ) A degree from a program in engineering or engineering technology that is accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). The National Maritime Center will give consideration to accepting education credentials from programs having other than ABET accreditation. An applicant qualifying through a degree program must also have at least 28 days of service as a trainee under the supervision of an individual holding a license or MMC endorsement as ballast control operator; and
( 2 ) Present evidence of training course completion as follows: ( i ) A certificate from a Coast Guard-approved stability course approved for barge supervisor or ballast control operator.
( ii ) A certificate from a Coast Guard-approved survival suit and survival craft training course.
( iii ) A certificate from a firefighting training course as required by § 11.201(h) of this part.
( b ) An applicant for an endorsement as BCO who holds an unlimited license or MMC endorsement as master, mate, chief engineer, or assistant engineer must satisfy the requirements in paragraph (a)(2) of this section and have at least 28 days of service as a trainee under the supervision of an individual holding an endorsement as BCO.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  State of
Name of Subsidiary              Incorporation      Doing Business As
------------------              -------------      -----------------
<S>                             <C>                <C>
NAHC Financial, Inc.                  TN                   -----
NAHC Limited Partnership              TN                   -----
NAHC Management Company, Inc.         TN                   -----
NAHC Georgia Holdings, Inc.           TN           Memorial Hospital of Adel
NAHC of Georgia, Inc.                 GA                   -----
NAHC of Iowa, Inc.                    TN           Davenport Medical Center
NAHC of Mississippi, Inc.             TN           Crosby Memorial Hospital
NAHC of Missouri, Inc.                TN           Doctors Hospital
NAHC of Oregon, Inc.                  TN           Woodland Park Hospital
NAHC II of Oregon, Inc.               TN           Eastmoreland Hospital
NAHC III of Oregon, Inc.              OR                   -----
NAHC of Tennessee, Inc.               TN           Delta Medical Center
NAHC of Texas, Inc.                   TN           Memorial Hospital of Center
NAHC II of Texas, Inc.                TN           Dolly Vinsant Memorial Hospital
NAHC of Washington, Inc.              TN           Puget Sound Hospital
NAHC of Wyoming, Inc.                 TN           Lander Valley Medical Center
</TABLE>
§ 800.10 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This part is based on the following sections of title I of the Affordable Care Act: ( 1 ) *1001.* Amendments to the Public Health Service Act.
( 2 ) *1302.* Essential Health Benefits Requirements.
( 3 ) *1311.* Affordable Choices of Health Benefit Plans.
( 4 ) *1324.* Level Playing Field.
( 5 ) *1334.* Multi-State Plans.
( 6 ) *1341.* Transitional Reinsurance Program for Individual Market in Each State.
( 7 ) *1342.* Establishment of Risk Corridors for Plans in Individual and Small Group Markets.
( 8 ) *1343.* Risk Adjustment.
( b ) *Scope.* This part establishes standards for health insurance issuers to contract with the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to offer Multi-State Plan (MSP) options to provide health insurance coverage on Exchanges for each State. It also establishes standards for appeal of a decision by OPM affecting the issuer's participation in the MSP Program and standards for an enrollee in an MSP option to appeal denials of payment or services by an MSP issuer.
#### § 90.61 Review of general regulations.

The Secretary shall review the effectiveness of these regulations in securing compliance with the Act. As part of this review, 30 months after the effective date of these regulations, the Secretary shall publish a notice of opportunity for public comment on the effectiveness of the regulations. The Secretary will assess the comments and publish the results of the review and assessment in the Federal Register.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Center for Public Integrity, |

|

Plaintiff, |

|

v. | Civil Action No. 17-1162 (CRC)

| ECF

Federal Election Commission, |

|

Defendant. |

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

In its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 13, at 5), Plaintiff argued that 

the @altFEC emails must contain some segregable, non-exempt information, such as the names 

of the senders and recipients, and the dates of the emails. In response, Defendant has apparently 

conceded the point and disclosed this information via its Vaughn index (Docket No. 16-1). Given 

this, there is no legal basis for Defendant to withhold these emails in full. The Freedom of 

Information Act requires that they be released in redacted form, if not in full.

Plaintiff has separately moved for in camera review of the withheld records (Docket No. 

15). If granted, in camera review would provide the Court with evidence as to whether there is 

other information that is both non-exempt and segregable. Whether to order in camera review is, 

of course, a matter within the Court’s discretion. See Ray v. Turner, 587 F.2d 1187, 1195 (D.C. 

Cir. 1978) (per curiam).

If, as Defendant has urged, the Court does not order in camera review, then the Court 

must find that Defendant has not met its burden to justify its withholdings. It has not provided 

any evidence that the records contain no reasonably segregable non-exempt information. The 

Case 1:17-cv-01162-CRC Document 20 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 2
Declaration submitted (Docket No. 12-1, at ¶ 6) states only that Defendant’s “Administrative 

Law Team concluded that the remaining 14 pages of documents ... did not contain any reasonably 

segregable non-exempt information.” (emphasis added) The Court may credit testimony (or a 

declaration) that describes the contents of the documents, but the de novo review required under 

FOIA (at 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B)) necessarily bars the Court from accepting an agency’s conclusions 

unsupported by evidence.

For these reasons and those stated in the previous Memorandum of Points and 

Authorities, the Court should grant Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.

Respectfully submitted,

/S/

Peter Newbatt Smith 

D.C. Bar #458244

Center for Public Integrity

910 17th Street, N.W., 7th Floor

Washington, DC 20006-2606

202-481-1239

psmith@publicintegrity.org

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:17-cv-01162-CRC Document 20 Filed 11/02/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal
Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




November
      13, 2008
                  
                  /s/ Daniel
      B. O’BrienDaniel
      B. O’BrienPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer
§ 111.15-10 Ventilation. ( a ) *General.* Each room, locker, and box for storage batteries must be arranged or ventilated to prevent accumulation of flammable gas.
( b ) *Power ventilation.* If power ventilation is required, the following must be met: ( 1 ) The power ventilation system must be separate from ventilation systems for other spaces.
( 2 ) Electric motors must be outside the duct and compartment and: ( i ) Have an explosion-proof motor for a Class I, Division 1, Group B or its IEC equivalent designation of Zone 1, IIB + H2 location; or
( ii ) Be at least 10 ft. (3 m) from the exhaust end of the duct.
( 3 ) Each blower must have a non-sparking fan.
( 4 ) The power ventilation system must be interlocked with the battery charger so that the battery cannot be charged without ventilation.
( c ) *Large battery installations.* Each battery room for large battery installations must have a power exhaust ventilation system and have openings for intake air near the floor that allow the passage of the quantity of air that must be expelled. The quantity of the air expelled must be at least: q = 3.89(i)(n). where: q = quantity of expelled air in cubic feet per hour. i = Maximum charging current during gas formation, or one-fourth of the maximum obtainable charging current of the charging facility, whichever is greater. n = Number of cells.
( d ) *Moderate and small battery installations.* Each battery room or battery locker for moderate or small battery installations must have louvers near the bottom of the room or locker for air, and must be ventilated by: ( 1 ) Ventilation that meets paragraph (c) of this section;
( 2 ) An exhaust duct: ( i ) That ends in a mechanically ventilated space or in the weather;
( ii ) That extends from the top of the room or locker to at least 3 ft. (1 m) above the top of the room or locker;
( iii ) That is at an angle of 45 degrees or less from the vertical; and
( iv ) That has no appliances, such as flame arresters, that impede free passage of air or gas mixtures; or
( 3 ) A duct from the top of the room or locker to an exhaust ventilation duct.
( e ) *Deck boxes.* Except for a deck box for a small battery installation, each deck box must have a duct from the top of the box to at least 4 ft. (1.2 m) above the box ending in a gooseneck or mushroom head that prevents entrance of water. Holes for air must be on at least two parallel sides of each box.
( f ) *Weathertight.* Each deck box must be weathertight.
( g ) *Boxes for small battery installations.* Each box for a small battery installation must have openings near the top to allow escape of gas. If the installation is in a non-environmentally-controlled location, the installation must prevent the ingress of water.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28278, June 4, 1996; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16361, Mar. 16, 2023]
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Travis Lee Williams, * From the 238th District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR37863.

Vs. No. 11-12-00165-CR * June 12, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Aelen Unan, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:14−cv−13470−MOB−DRG

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

James K Haveman, et al.,

Defendant(s),

NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING

 You are hereby notified to appear before District Judge Marianne O. Battani at the United

States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit,

Michigan. Please report to Room 272. The following motion(s) are scheduled for hearing:

Motion to Certify Class − #3

Motion for Preliminary Injunction − #4

Motion to Strike − #14

• RESPONSE DUE: October 30, 2014

• REPLY DUE: November 20, 2014

• MOTION HEARING: December 11, 2014 at 03:00 PM

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/C. Motowski 

Acting in the absence of KaMyra Doaks

Dated: October 7, 2014

2:14-cv-13470-MOB-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 10/07/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 611
#### § 12.801 Purpose.

The rules in this subpart implement 46 U.S.C. 8103(k) by establishing requirements for the issuance of MMCs, valid only for service in the steward's department of U.S. flag large passenger vessels, to non-resident aliens.
#### § 75.452 Maintenance and repair costs.

Costs incurred for utilities, insurance, security, necessary maintenance, janitorial services, repair, or upkeep of buildings and equipment (including Federal property unless otherwise provided for) which neither add to the permanent value of the property nor appreciably prolong its intended life, but keep it in an efficient operating condition, are allowable. Costs incurred for improvements which add to the permanent value of the buildings and equipment or appreciably prolong their intended life must be treated as capital expenditures (see § 75.439). These costs are only allowable to the extent not paid through rental or other agreements.