alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010016EN.01007601.xml

| 22.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 16/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 16/76

---

Request for waiver of the immunity of Frank Vanhecke

P6_TA(2008)0537

European Parliament decision of 18 November 2008 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Frank Vanhecke (2008/2092(IMM))

(2010/C 16 E/19)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Frank Vanhecke, submitted, at the request the Dendermonde Public Prosecutor, by the Minister of Justice of the Kingdom of Belgium, and announced in plenary sitting on 10 April 2008, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Frank Vanhecke, submitted, at the request the Dendermonde Public Prosecutor, by the Minister of Justice of the Kingdom of Belgium, and announced in plenary sitting on 10 April 2008,

| — | having heard Frank Vanhecke in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having heard Frank Vanhecke in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

| — | having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

1

| — | having regard to Articles 58 and 59 of the Belgian Constitution, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 58 and 59 of the Belgian Constitution,

| — | having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0421/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0421/2008),

1.   Decides to waive the immunity of Frank Vanhecke;

2.   Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authority of the Kingdom of Belgium.

---

(1)  Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and Others [1986] ECR 2391.

1

Wagner

Fohrmann and Krier

Wybot

Faure and Others

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         EXHIBIT 11

                                               CATSKILL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                         COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

                                       (In thousands, except share and per share data)

                                                   Three Months Ended Sept 30,        Years Ended Sept 30,
                                                   --------------------------      --------------------------
                                                      1999            1998            1999            1998
                                                   ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income per common share - basic
   Net income applicable to common shares ...      $    1,104      $      978      $    4,225      $    3,882
   Weighted average common shares outstanding       3,518,497       3,851,094       3,752,448       4,066,971
   Net income per common share - basic ......      $      .31      $      .25      $     1.13      $      .95
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

Net income per common share - diluted
   Net income applicable to common shares ...      $    1,104      $      978      $    4,225      $    3,882
   Weighted average common shares outstanding       3,518,497       3,851,094       3,752,448       4,066,971
   Dilutive common stock options (1) ........         103,397          95,618          76,861         120,762
                                                   ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------

   Weighted average common shares
     and common share equivalents outstanding       3,621,894       3,946,712       3,829,309       4,187,733
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

   Net income per common share - diluted ....      $      .30      $      .25      $     1.10      $      .93
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>


(1) Dilutive common stock options  (includes  granted,  but unvested  restricted
stock under the Company's MRP plan and options granted,  but unexercised,  under
its stock  option plan) are based on the  treasury  stock  method using  average
market price.  The treasury stock method  recognizes the use of assumed proceeds
upon the exercise of options, and the amount of unearned compensation attributed
to future services under the Company's  restricted stock plan, including any tax
benefits  related to either plan; to purchase the Company's  common stock at the
average market price during the period.
# EUSGS
science for

## achanging world 

# Chromium-A National Mineral Commodity Perspective

By 

## John 

## F. Papp



# Open-File Report 

# 2007-1167

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

# Chromium material flow to end uses

Mining. Processing. and Recycling Industries A 

### tr----------------------J

(Direct sales.

### product)~;Refractory plant 

# I

(ROM CrOre to CrOre nrnrb Irt)

Smelter 

# 1r (CrOre to 

### I 

### "I FeCr) Primary Supply Other Ferrous alloys

- Cast Iron

- Steel • Alloy • Stainless Nonferrous alloys

- Aluminum

- Copper



# - Nickel

- Other Military Lumber Machinery Mining Mining eqUipment Pharmaceuticals Oil & gas extraction Pigments and dyes Printing Railroad equipment Refractory products Transportation Ships Beneficiation plant!



### Notes: CrOre 

# =Chromi1e ore FeCr

# =Ferrochromium Na:pr 2

## o., 

# =Sodium dichromate ROM 

# =Run-of-Mine Industrial Primary Uses and Industrial Intermediate Products Products

, 

## ,..--"---. ,.---A---.. cement kiln Foundry sand Fiberglass furnace Glass-tank regenerator Steel industry Other Chromium plating Corrosion control Metal finishing Pigments Ta nning compounds Wood preservative End Use Industries5 

## ,.---A---.. Agriculture Chemicals Construction Containers Equipment Forestry Glass Manufacturing Selected Industrial and Consumer Products 

## ,.---A---.. Aircraft Automobiles Barrels Beverage. Chemical.

Dairy. and Food process equipment Buses Cans Electrical appliances Flatware Hardware Hollowware

1 Mining Includes screening and hand sorting. ;1 Beneficiation includes crushing. grinding. and separation techniques including gravimetric. heavy medi".,{I1agnetic. and spiral. 3 Master/alloy is an alloy used as a**f~** stockto produce other alloys. 4 Chromium materials derived from industrial

. processing and post consumer goods. 5 Based on North American Industrial Classification system.



# ..u..)G.s

# r4~ · "-

# Ch~t1\;\Jrt\ -.4

# !'-l~"O~ jJ;.ru-7J.{

# ~..........-tc'**Pe..rt~~** It

# P~f' 

# J. h., 

# F"

# Chromite are material flow

Chromite ore or Heavy concentrate 

# H media * 

# made separation therefrom. Gravity 

# H Coarse separation 

# H ore Products of and/or --i 

# mine and/or Electro- Fine Crushing beneficiation " 

# magnetic ore plant for separation 

# 4J Grinding

# ~ processmg

r 

# H

Hand 

# H Run-of-mine 

# - ri 

# sorting --i 

# ore (Crude ore --i 

# H L; 

# production) Screening**~** . 

# H

Note: 

# Input Not shown above are reject and recycle fraction that are associated with most processes as shown to the right. Electric furnace smelting to make ferrochromium

Kiln roasting and dissolution to make chromium chemicals Milling and sizing**~omake** 

# chromitecontaining refractory products

Product

Reject 

# LReCYc1e 23
§ 86.34 Access to course offerings. A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses. ( a ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from the effective date of this regulation. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from the effective date of this regulation.
( b ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( c ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( d ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards which do not have such effect.
( e ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools which deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( f ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality which may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.
(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 14, 2006 | /s/ Daniel B. OBrien

Daniel B. OBrien

President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                                



1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

Plaintiff, Criminal No. 14-cr-20520 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

LAMONT SAPP, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER TO SEAL EXHIBIT # 1 MEDICAL RECORDS TO 

UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE OPPOSING THE DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE (#81) 

The government having moved to seal Exhibit # 1Medical Records to United 

States’ Response Opposing The Defendant’s Motion For Compassionate Release, 

and the Court being duly advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Exhibit Medical Records be sealed until 

further Order of the Court. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 2, 2020 

Case 2:14-cr-20520-MFL-RSW ECF No. 84 filed 06/02/20 PageID.616 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on June 2, 2020, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764

Case 2:14-cr-20520-MFL-RSW ECF No. 84 filed 06/02/20 PageID.617 Page 2 of 2
#### Charles C. Jolliffe, Respondent, *v.*John L. Miller, Appellant.

*Jolliffe y. Miller,*126 App. Div. 763, affirmed.

(Argued June 10, 1909;

decided October 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June *50525, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence in failing to properly guard the doorway to an elevator shaft.

*Wilson B. Brice*for appellant.

*Herbert 0. Smyth, Francis L. Wellman, Sumner B. Stiles*and *Jacob G-. Lazarus*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1202]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  9:30 a.m., Tuesday, March 20, 2007.

PLACE:  NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

STATUS:  The two items are open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
7870, Railroad Accident Report--Collision of Two CN Freight Trains, 
Anding, Mississippi, July 10, 2005 (DCA-05-MR-011).
7834A, Marine Accident Brief and Safety Recommendation Letter--Fire on 
Board U.S. Small Passenger Vessel Massachusetts, Boston Harbor, 
Massachusetts, June 12, 2006.

NEW MEDIA CONTACT:  Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, March 16, 2007.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Web cast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: March 9, 2007.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-1202 Filed 3-9-07; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
#### §§ 86.62-86.70 [Reserved]
§ 800.303 MSP Program contracting. ( a ) *Participation in MSP Program.* To become an MSP issuer, the applicant and the Director or the Director's designee must sign a contract that meets the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Standard contract.* OPM will establish a standard contract for the MSP Program.
( c ) *Premiums.* OPM and the applicant will negotiate the premiums for an MSP option for each plan year in accordance with the provisions of subpart C of this part.
( d ) *Package of benefits.* OPM must approve the applicant's package of benefits for its MSP option.
( e ) *Additional terms and conditions.* OPM may elect to negotiate with an applicant such additional terms, conditions, and requirements that: ( 1 ) Are in the interests of MSP enrollees; or
( 2 ) OPM determines to be appropriate.
( f ) Certification to offer health insurance coverage. ( 1 ) For each plan year, an MSP Program contract will specify MSP options that OPM has certified, the specific package(s) of benefits authorized to be offered on each Exchange, and the premiums to be charged for each package of benefits on each Exchange.
( 2 ) An MSP issuer may not offer an MSP option on an Exchange unless its MSP Program contract with OPM includes a certification authorizing the MSP issuer to offer the MSP option on that Exchange in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
§ 108.221 Storm rails. Each unit must have a storm rail in the following locations: ( a ) On each deckhouse side that is normally accessible.
( b ) On each side of each passageway that is wider than 1.83 meters (6 feet).
( c ) On at least one side of each passageway that is less than 1.83 meters (6 feet) wide.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1892 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1892

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 102 North Main Street in Cedarville, Ohio, as the ``William `Brent' 
                         Turner Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

 Mr. Austria introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 102 North Main Street in Cedarville, Ohio, as the ``William `Brent' 
                         Turner Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM ``BRENT'' TURNER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 102 North Main Street in Cedarville, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``William `Brent' Turner Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William 
`Brent' Turner Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Preliminary Injunction Motion 1

United States District Court

Eastern District of Virginia

Richmond Division

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v.

Federal Election Commission and

United States Department of Justice,

Defendants.

Case No.

Preliminary Injunction Motion

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. (“RTAO”) moves for a preliminary injunction against

Defendants to enjoin them from enforcing (a) 11 C.F.R. § 100.22(b) (“expressly advocating”),

(b) 11 C.F.R § 100.57 (donations “to support or oppose”); (c) the FEC’s PAC status enforcement

policy, including the major-purpose test; and (d) 11 C.F.R. § 114.15 (WRTL II’ appeal-to-vote

test) facially and as applied to RTAO and its intended activities, as set out in the Verified Complaint.

James Bopp, Jr.,* jboppjr@aol.com

Richard E. Coleson,*

rcoleson@bopplaw.com

Barry A. Bostrom,*

bbostrom@bopplaw.com

Clayton J. Callen,* ccallen@bopplaw.com

BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM

1 South Sixth Street

Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510

812/232-2434 telephone

812/234-3685 facsimile

 *pro hac vice motion pending

Lead Counsel for Plaintiff

Respectfully submitted,

Michael Boos (VA State Bar No. 37524)

Law Office of Michael Boos

4101 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 313

Fairfax, VA 22030

703/691-7717 telephone

703/691-7543 facsimile

michael.boos@gte.net

Local Counsel for Plaintiff
Preliminary Injunction Motion 2

Certificate of Service

I certify that on July ___, 2008, the foregoing document was served by certified mail on

the persons identified below. In addition, a courtesy copy was sent by email to the FEC at

tduncan@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, and kdeeley@fec.gov, and a courtesy copy was sent by

FedEx overnight service to General Mukasey.

Thomasenia P. Duncan, General Counsel

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20436

Civil Process Clerk

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

600 East Main Street, Suite 1800

Richmond, VA 23219-2447

Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20530

Michael Boos
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 40-3, PageID.269 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 40-3, PageID.270 Filed 04/19/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 40-3, PageID.271 Filed 04/19/16 Page 3 of 3
§ 900.202 Emergency actions. ( a ) *General.* Emergency circumstances may require immediate actions that preclude following standard NEPA processes. The Council shall limit alternative arrangements to those actions that are necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency. In the event of emergency circumstances, the Approving Official should coordinate with the Federal Co-Chair as soon as practicable. Immediate emergency actions necessary to protect the lives and safety of the public or prevent adverse impacts to ecological resources and functions should never be delayed in order to comply with these NEPA procedures. Alternative arrangements for NEPA compliance are permitted for emergency actions pursuant to paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
( b ) *Categorical exclusion (CATEX).* When emergency circumstances make it necessary to determine whether an extraordinary circumstance would preclude the use of a CATEX, the Approving Official shall make the determination as soon as practicable. If an extraordinary circumstance exists, the Approving Official shall comply with paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, as applicable.
( c ) *Environmental assessment (EA).* When emergency circumstances make it necessary to take an action that requires an EA before the EA can be completed, the Approving Official will consult with the Federal Co-Chair to develop alternative arrangements to meet the requirements of these NEPA implementing procedures and CEQ Regulations pertaining to EAs. Alternative arrangements should focus on minimizing adverse environmental impacts of the proposed action and the emergency. To the maximum extent practicable, these alternative arrangements should include the content, interagency coordination, and public notification and involvement that would normally be undertaken for an EA for the action at issue and cannot alter the requirements of the CEQ Regulations at 40 CFR 1508.9(a)(1) and (b). The Federal Co-Chair may grant an alternative arrangement. Any alternative arrangement shall be documented. The Federal Co-Chair will inform CEQ of the alternative arrangements at the earliest opportunity.
( d ) *Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).* Where emergency circumstances make it necessary to take actions with significant environmental impacts without observing other provisions of these NEPA implementing procedures and the CEQ Regulations (see 40 CFR 1506.11) the Federal Co-Chair may consult with CEQ about alternative arrangements for implementation of NEPA. In these situations, the Commission may reduce processing times or, if the emergency situation warrants, abbreviate its preparation and processing of EISs. Any request for alternative arrangements must be submitted by the Federal Co-Chair to CEQ and notice of a potential request should be provided to CEQ at the earliest opportunity. For projects undertaken by an applicant, the Approving Official will inform the Federal Co-Chair about the emergency. The Federal Co-Chair will consult CEQ requesting the alternative arrangements for complying with NEPA.