alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders of 
Universal Power Group, Inc.

We consent to
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-142736 on Form S-8
of Universal Power Group, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2009 relating to
theconsolidated balance
sheet of Universal Power Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, changes in shareholders equity and
cash flows for the year then ended, which report is included in the December
31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Universal Power Group, Inc.

|                    | 
|------------------- | 
|/s/ KBA
GROUP LLP   | 
|                    | 
|Dallas,
 Texas     
|September 22,
 2010

---
§ 109.557 Flammable and combustible liquids: Carriage. The master or person in charge shall ensure that— ( a ) Flammable and combustible liquids in bulk are not carried, except as allowed by endorsement to the Certificate of Inspection;
( b ) Portable tanks are handled and stowed in accordance with subparts 98.30 and 98.33 of this chapter and the provisions of 49 CFR parts 171 through 179 that apply to portable tanks; and
( c ) Grades B and lower liquids are— ( 1 ) Authorized, by the Commandant, to be carried; and
( 2 ) Carried only in fixed independent or integral tanks.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56828, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 84-043, 55 FR 37413, Sept. 11, 1990]
§ 2508.19 What Privacy Act exemptions or control of systems of records are exempt from disclosure? ( a ) Certain systems of records that are maintained by the Corporation are exempted from provisions of the Privacy Act in accordance with exemptions (j) and (k) of 5 U.S.C. 552a. ( 1 ) Exemption of Inspector General system of records. Pursuant to, and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the system of records maintained by the Office of the Inspector General that contains the Investigative Files shall be exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, except subsections (b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6)(7), (9), (10), and (11), and (I), and 45 CFR 2508.11, 2508.12, 2508.13, 2508.14, 2508.15, 2508.16, and 2508.17, insofar as the system contains information pertaining to criminal law enforcement investigations.
( 2 ) Pursuant to, and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the system of records maintained by the Office of the Inspector General that contains the Investigative Files shall be exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4) (G), (H), and (I), and (f), and 45 CFR 2508.11, 2508.12, 2508.13, 2508.14, 2508.15, 2508.16, and 2508.17, insofar as the system contains investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes.
( b ) Exemptions to the General Counsel system of records. Pursuant to, and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5), the system of records maintained by the Office of the General Counsel that contains the Legal Office Litigation/Correspondence Files shall be exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5), and 45 CFR 2508.4, insofar as the system contains information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.
9

8

10

7

6

2

3

4

5

1

liven up your meals with 

vegetables and fruits

10 tips to improve your meals 

with vegetables and fruits

Discover the many benefits of adding vegetables and fruits to your meals. They are low in fat and 

calories, while providing fiber and other key nutrients. Most Americans should eat more than 3 cups—and for some, 

up to 6 cups—of vegetables and fruits each day. Vegetables and fruits don’t just add nutrition to meals. They can 

also add color, flavor, and texture. Explore these creative ways to bring healthy foods to your table.

 

 fire up the grill

Use the grill to cook vegetables and fruits. Try grilling 

mushrooms, carrots, peppers, or potatoes on a kabob 

skewer. Brush with oil to keep them from drying out. Grilled 

fruits like peaches, pineapple, or mangos add great flavor 

to a cookout.

expand the flavor of your casseroles Mix vegetables such as sauteed 

onions, peas, pinto beans, or 

tomatoes into your favorite dish for that 

extra flavor. 

planning something Italian?

Add extra vegetables to your pasta dish. Slip some 

peppers, spinach, red beans, onions, or cherry 

tomatoes into your traditional tomato sauce. Vegetables 

provide texture and low-calorie bulk that satisfies.

get creative with your salad

Toss in shredded carrots, strawberries, spinach, 

watercress, orange segments, or sweet peas for a 

flavorful, fun salad.

salad bars aren’t just for salads

Try eating sliced fruit from the salad bar as your 

dessert when dining out. This will help you avoid any 

baked desserts that are high in calories.

 DG TipSheet No. 10

 June 2011

Center for Nutrition USDA is an equal opportunity 

Policy and Promotion provider and employer.

10

tips

Nutrition 

Education Series

Go to www.ChooseMyPlate.gov for more information.

 get in on the stir-frying fun

Try something new! Stir-fry your veggies—like broccoli, 

carrots, sugar snap peas, mushrooms, or green 

beans—for a quick-and-easy addition to any meal.

add them to your sandwiches

 Whether it is a sandwich or wrap, 

 vegetables make great additions to both. 

Try sliced tomatoes, romaine lettuce, or 

avocado on your everday sandwich or 

wrap for extra flavor.

be creative with your baked goods

Add apples, bananas, blueberries, or pears to your 

favorite muffin recipe for a treat.

 make a tasty fruit smoothie 

For dessert, blend strawberries, 

 blueberries, or raspberries with 

frozen bananas and 100% fruit juice 

for a delicious frozen fruit smoothie.

liven up an omelet

Boost the color and flavor of your morning

 omelet with vegetables. Simply chop, saute, 

and add them to the egg as it cooks. Try combining different 

vegetables, such as mushrooms, spinach, onions, or bell 

peppers.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, John Stanton, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PowerCerv Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

April 14,2004
# CE2010045EN.01013501.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/135 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/135

---

Shared effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions ***I

P6_TA(2008)0611

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 December 2008 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 (COM(2008)0017 — C6-0041/2008 — 2008/0014(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/43)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0017),

| — | having regard to Articles 251(2) and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0041/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0041/2008),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Regional Development (A6-0411/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Regional Development (A6-0411/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.   Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2008)0014

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 17 December 2008 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 406/2009/EC.)

---
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.109 IRB review of research. ( a ) An IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research activities covered by this policy, including exempt research activities under § 46.104 for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption (under § 46.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7), and (8)).
( b ) An IRB shall require that information given to subjects (or legally authorized representatives, when appropriate) as part of informed consent is in accordance with § 46.116. The IRB may require that information, in addition to that specifically mentioned in § 46.116, be given to the subjects when in the IRB's judgment the information would meaningfully add to the protection of the rights and welfare of subjects.
( c ) An IRB shall require documentation of informed consent or may waive documentation in accordance with § 46.117.
( d ) An IRB shall notify investigators and the institution in writing of its decision to approve or disapprove the proposed research activity, or of modifications required to secure IRB approval of the research activity. If the IRB decides to disapprove a research activity, it shall include in its written notification a statement of the reasons for its decision and give the investigator an opportunity to respond in person or in writing.
( e ) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research requiring review by the convened IRB at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, not less than once per year, except as described in § 46.109(f).
( f ) ( 1 ) Unless an IRB determines otherwise, continuing review of research is not required in the following circumstances: ( i ) Research eligible for expedited review in accordance with § 46.110;
( ii ) Research reviewed by the IRB in accordance with the limited IRB review described in § 46.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), or (d)(7) or (8);
( iii ) Research that has progressed to the point that it involves only one or both of the following, which are part of the IRB-approved study: ( A ) Data analysis, including analysis of identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, or
( B ) Accessing follow-up clinical data from procedures that subjects would undergo as part of clinical care.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( g ) An IRB shall have authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process and the research.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
§ 111.106-11 Classification of storage and handling locations of heated combustible liquid cargoes. ( a ) This section applies to locations surrounding the storage and handling of combustible liquid cargoes with closed-cup flashpoints exceeding 60 °C (140 °F).
( b ) The interiors of independent storage tanks and integral tanks containing cargoes with closed-cup flashpoints of 60 °C (140 °F) or higher and heated to within 15 °C of their flashpoint are considered Class I Special Division 1 (Zone 0). The hazardous locations in § 111.106-9 of this subpart apply.
---

---

# Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In
connection with the Amendment no. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd., a
company organized under the laws of the State of Israel (the Company),
for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge, that:

|1. | the
Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements                of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as                of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ Adiv Baruch
Adiv BaruchPresident and Chief Executive Officer | By: /s/ Nehemia Kaufman
Nehemia KaufmanChief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 30, 2006



---

---
§ 91.41 Compliance reviews. ( a ) HHS may conduct compliance reviews and pre-award reviews or use other similar procedures that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of the Act and these regulations. HHS may conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The reviews may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of the Act and these regulations has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review or pre-award review indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, HHS will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, HHS will arrange for enforcement as described in § 91.46.
§ 702.8 Evidence at Commission proceedings. ( a ) The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law or equity shall not control proceedings of the Commission.
( b ) Where a witness testifying at a public session of a hearing or a session for return of subpoenaed documents offers the sworn statements of other persons, such statements, in the discretion of the Commission, may be included in the record, provided they are received by the Commission 24 hours in advance of the witness' appearance.
( c ) The prepared statement of a witness testifying at a public session of a hearing, in the discretion of the Commission, may be placed into the record, provided that such statement is received by the Commission 24 hours in advance of the witness' appearance.
( d ) In the discretion of the Commission, evidence may be included in the record after the close of a public session of a hearing provided the Commission determines that such evidence does not tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person.
( e ) The Commission will determine the pertinence of testimony and evidence adduced at its proceedings and may refuse to include in the record of a proceeding or may strike from the record any evidence it considers to be cumulative, immaterial, or not pertinent.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2


              
I hereby waive any claim I might have under my employment contract, applicable law or otherwise and release my employer and its affiliates, including but not limited to PVH Europe B.V. and PVH Corp., from any liability with respect to any of the timing of my bonus and GRIP payouts, the temporary reduction of my base salary or my lower bonus opportunities for 2020. I understand that in all other instances my employment contract remains in full force and effect and the terms of my employment are unchanged.


Signature for acceptance:




              /s/ Daniel Grieder    
              Daniel Grieder




              Date:  April 7, 2020
[§]I!][;) DEVELOPMENT, INC. 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069 

Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (SRQ) 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

LJ 

I am writing as President of SDR Development, Inc. to express our strong support for the above 

referenced grant application to the Small Community Air Service Development Program. The 

-----recentdecisiorrt>y-southwest Airlineswpull Air'frarr service from SRQ is a--major~bJow-t~-~-~-- " 

service and economic competitiveness of the entire region served by Sarasota Bradenton 

International Airport. AirTran accounted for over 360,000 passengers or nearly 30% of all 

passenger traffic at SRQ in 2011. 

Sarasota Bradenton also suffers from a lack of access to a westbound airline gateway. This 

forces local consumers to drive to other airports, thereby inflicting economic damage on the 

local economy. 

A 1997 Economic Impact Study completed as part of the SRQ Master Plan Update revealed 

that 57% of all enplanements at SRQ were out of area visitors spending an average of $665.00 

per visit. Using the CY 2011 AirTran passenger traffic, this equates to 102,600 visitors to the 

SRQ area. When combined with the 100,000 passengers lost due to no westbound service, this 

equates to a loss of over $105,000,000 of direct visitor expenditures annually. When the 

multiplier effect is factored in, it equates to a loss of nearly $285,000,000 of economic impact 

and 2,600 jobs to the area. 

The community is partnering with the airport to match the grant funds dollar for dollar on this 

critical matter. We ask the Department consider the serious negative effects the recent 

approval provided to Southwest Airlines to acquire AirTran Airways has had on our community 

and approve the application for assistance. Thank you for your consideration. 

Stephen D. Russell, President 

SDR Development, Inc. 

Cc: The Honorable Ray H. LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

1

1800 Second Street • Suite 717, Sarasota, Florida, 34236 

Tel: (941) 953-3757 • Fax: (941) 953-4306
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10001

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRENCE S. COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-123

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Terrence S. Coleman has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Coleman has not

filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### Edna D. Kahn, Appellant, *v.*Jacob H. Kahn, Respondent.

*Kahn*v. *Kahn,*133 App. Div. 897, affirmed.

(Submitted October 7, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 25, 1909, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term fixing the amount to be paid by defendant to plaintiff for the support of their child.

*George Edwin Joseph*for appellant.

*Michael Schaap*and *Edward Ilymes*for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.