alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 96.82 Required report on households assisted. ( a ) Each grantee which is a State or an insular area which receives an annual allotment of at least $200,000 shall submit to the Department, as part of its LIHEAP grant application, the data required by section 2605(c)(1)(G) of Public Law 97-35 (42 U.S.C. 8624(c)(1)(G)) for the 12-month period corresponding to the Federal fiscal year (October 1-September 30) preceding the fiscal year for which funds are requested. The data shall be reported separately for LIHEAP heating, cooling, crisis, and weatherization assistance.
( b ) Each grantee which is an insular area which receives an annual allotment of less than $200,000 or which is an Indian tribe or tribal organization which receives direct funding from the Department shall submit to the Department, as part of its LIHEAP grant application, data on the number of households receiving LIHEAP assistance during the 12-month period corresponding to the Federal fiscal year (October 1-September 30) preceding the fiscal year for which funds are requested. The data shall be reported separately for LIHEAP heating, cooling, crisis, and weatherization assistance.
( c ) Grantees will not receive their LIHEAP grant allotment for the fiscal year until the Department has received the report required under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
[64 FR 55858, Oct. 15, 1999]
#### Petition of Anderson.

Appeal *by*the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York from an order made at special term vacating certain assessments made upon the property of the petitioner Henry James Anderson for paving First avenue in said city.

*William Barnes,*for appellants.

*B. Ellery Anderson,*for respondent.

Daniels, J.

The only question involved was whether there was proper proof of publication, which was of the same character as that in *Petition of Phillips, ante,*p. 484, and the same doctrine was held as in that case. It was also held that the cases of *Matter of Douglass,*46 N. Y. 42, and *Matter of Astor,*50 id. 363, did not conflict with such doctrine.

*Order reversed.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1057]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).
    Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on March 
8, 2007, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> February 8, 2007 (Open)

B. New Business

    <bullet> FCA Bookletter BL-043--Revised Guidance on Farm Credit 
Bank and Association Nominating Committees

C. Reports

    <bullet> FCSBA Quarterly Report

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 07-1057 Filed 3-2-07; 11:25 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.267 Special examination in lieu of drydocking for self-elevating units. ( a ) A self-elevating unit must be specially examined in accordance with a plan— ( 1 ) Submitted in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 2 ) Approved by the Commandant (CG-CVC).
( b ) To meet the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, the owner or operator of the unit must submit a plan to the Commandant (CG-CVC) that provides for— ( 1 ) Examination of the unit's hull while it is in the elevated position; and
( 2 ) Examination of the supporting mat, spud cans, or footings while the unit is afloat.
( c ) The plan required in paragraph (b) of this section must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The planned location where the unit is to be examined.
( 2 ) The methods to be used to conduct the hull examination.
( 3 ) The method of visual presentation for examination of the underwater components.
( 4 ) The methods of determining the condition of the underwater components.
( 5 ) The underwater high stress areas and the welds in those areas that are to be examined.
( 6 ) The names of the diver or diving company selected for the examination.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50464, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50730, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49233, Sept. 25, 2009]
#### Mary Bloomer, Respondent, *v.*The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Bloomer*v. *St. Paul Pire & Marine Ins. Go.,*127 App. Div. 919, affirmed.

(Argued November 19, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *513June 18,1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance.

*Sydney H. Palmer*and *Solomon J. Rosenblum*for appellant.

*Nathan P. Bushnell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. "Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
#### § 506.13 “Armed Forces of the United States” defined.

*Armed Forces of the United States* means the United States Air Force, Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard, and commissioned officers of the U.S. Public Health Service who were detailed for active duty with the Armed Forces of the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001005408
<NAME> JITNEY-JUNGLE STORES OF AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          14,426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     64,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,873
<PP&E>                                         311,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,965
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           57,921
<PREFERRED>                                      8,502
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                   (160,508)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (152,002)
<SALES>                                      1,228,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,228,533
<CGS>                                          925,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,191,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,085
<INCOME-TAX>                                       339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (16.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (16.26)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Rehabilitation Research Career Development Programs.                     

*Date:*                         March 27, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         DoubleTree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Anne Krey, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1029  Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 4.17

SMARTSERV
[LOGO]

2250 Butler Pike, Suite 150
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

November ___, 2003

------------------
------------------
------------------

     Re:  Convertible  Debentures issued during __________ 2003, as Amended,  by
          SmartServ  Online,  Inc. (the  "Company") to _________ in the original
          principal amount of $__________ (the "Debenture")


Dear _________:

     The  Company has not yet  concluded  the equity  financing  into which your
Debenture  will  automatically  convert  (referred  to  in  you  Debenture  as a
"Qualified  Private  Offering").  We  expected  to close the  Qualified  Private
Offering by no later than  February 19,  2004.  The purpose of this letter is to
obtain your consent to the  amendment  of the  Maturity  Date and to obtain your
waiver of any rights you may have that would prohibit this amendment.

     The  undersigned  hereby  agrees that its  Debenture  is hereby  amended as
follows:

          Each  reference to the date  "November  19, 2003,"  including  without
     limitation, the reference made in Section (i) of the first Paragraph, shall
     be deleted and replaced with the following date: "February 19, 2004"

     In consideration  for the execution and delivery of this letter by you, the
Company  agrees to issue to you a  warrant,  at an  exercise  price of $0.25 per
share, to purchase ______ shares of SmartServ common stock (this number is equal
to  25% of  the  shares  of  common  stock  underlying  your  Debenture,  and is
adjustable upon splits and dividends).  This warrant will have a three-year term
and will be identical in form to the warrant(s) issued with your Debenture.

     Except  as  expressly  amended  herein,  all terms  and  conditions  of the
Debentures and Warrants shall remain in full force and effect. Defined terms not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Debenture.

<PAGE>

     Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions at (610)  397-0689,
extension 203.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Thomas W. Haller
                                           -------------------------------------
                                        Name: Thomas W. Haller
                                        Title: SVP & Chief Financial Officer


Accepted and agreed this ___
day of November, 2003

____________________________________
Name:
Title (If Applicable): _____________
Company (If Applicable): ___________

              PLEASE RETURN VIA FAX TO TOM HALLER AT (610) 397-0846
Document

Exhibit 10.34

AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
(Restated Effective May 1, 2015)


        The J. M. Smucker Company hereby adopts this Amendment No. 2 to The J. M. Smucker Company Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Restated Effective May 1, 2015) (the “Plan”).  Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.  The provision of this Amendment No. 2 shall be effective as of May 1, 2017.
Section 1
        Section 3.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 “Contribution Credit” means an amount equal to 7% of total Compensation paid in the full Plan Year which shall be credited to a Participant’s account for each Plan Year the officer is a Participant, including the Plan Year in which the designation by the Committee occurs. Accounts will be credited with Contribution Credits as soon as administratively practicable following each payroll period to each Participant who is employed as an officer during that payroll period. No Contribution shall be based on Compensation paid after a Participant ceases to be an officer; provided, however, for the Plan Year beginning May 1, 2017, Contribution Credits for Participants in the Plan as of that date will be based on Compensation paid through December 31, 2017 regardless of a change in officer status during the Plan Year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all purposes under the Plan, effective for periods on or after January 1, 2018, no further accounts will be credited with Contribution Credits.  
[Signature on Following Page]
1









        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan to be executed this   16th   day of   October  , 2017.


THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY


						
	By: 	/s/ Jill R. Penrose
		
	Title:	Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Communications
		


2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LONNIE BRIDGES, #438821,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-12843

v. HONORABLE GERALD E. ROSEN

CARMEN PALMER,

Respondent.

 /

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Michigan prisoner Lonnie Bridges has submitted a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner's certificate of

prisoner institutional/trust fund account activity states that he had a current spendable account

balance of $375.62 in his prison account as of July 10, 2014 when an administrative officer of the

Michigan Department of Corrections certified his financial statement. The Court concludes from

the financial data that Petitioner has not established indigence and that he should be able to pay the

$5.00 filing fee for this action. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s application to proceed

in forma pauperis and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the petition for writ of habeas

corpus. Petitioner may submit a new petition with payment of the filing fee.

Before Petitioner may appeal the Court’s decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(a); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealabilitymay issue “only

if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). When a court denies relief on the merits, the substantial showing threshold is met if

the petitioner demonstrates that reasonable jurists would find the court's assessment of the

constitutional claim debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). When

2:14-cv-12843-GER-PTM Doc # 3 Filed 07/28/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 86
a court denies relief on procedural grounds without addressing the merits, a certificate of

appealability should issue if it is shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

petitioner states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the court was correct in its procedural ruling. Id. Jurists of reason would

not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. Accordingly, the Court DENIES a certificate of

appealability. This case is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: July 28, 2014

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel

of record on July 28, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135

2

2:14-cv-12843-GER-PTM Doc # 3 Filed 07/28/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 87
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: : Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf

Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Mexico City Miami Milan Monterrey

Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo

Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 023866/000002 - 6414195 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

February 9, 2015

By Electronic Mail

Mr. Brett Kruger

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Mesa Airlines, Inc.

(DFW-MTY/SLP) – Docket DOT-OST-2015-0022

Dear Mr. Kruger:

We have polled the U.S. air carrier representatives served with the above-referenced

application, filed on February 6, 2015, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought

therein. Given that Mesa Airlines would like to commence these services on or about

March 29, 2015, we respectfully request your expedited consideration and handling of this

application for exemption authority.

Sincerely,

Patrick Rizzi

Hogan Lovells US LLP

cc: dheffernan@cozen.com; Jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com; howard.kass@aa.com;

robert.wirick@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; chris.walker@delta.com;

matwood@cozen.com; stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com; jhill@cooley.com;

perkmann@cooley.com; bob.kneisley@wnco.com; leslie.abbott@wnco.com;

dkirstein@yklaw.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; thomas.ting@suncountry.com;

dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; barbara.russell@virginamerica.com;

brian.hedberg@dot.gov; brett.kruger@dot.gov; englets@state.gov; info@airlineinfo.com
#### § 84.3 Relationship to other laws.

This part does not invalidate or limit the remedies, rights, and procedures of any other Federal laws, or State or local laws (including State common law) that provide greater or equal protection for the rights of individuals with disabilities, or individuals associated with them.

[89 FR 40180, May 9, 2024]
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
GUESS?, INC
March 30, 2020


Carlos Alberini


Re:    Temporary Reduction to Annual Base Salary


Dear Carlos:
As you know, you are party to an employment agreement with Guess?, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated January 27, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”), which provides for an annual base salary of not less than One Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,200,000) (the “Normal Base Salary”).  You and the Company have agreed that your annual rate of base salary from the Company will be reduced to Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000) effective as of April 5, 2020 and continuing through such future date as may be agreed upon by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and the Executive or such earlier date you may cease to be employed by the Company, the “Expiration Date”).  Following the Expiration Date, your rate of annual base salary will automatically be restored to the rate of Normal Base Salary; provided, however, that you will not be entitled to any back pay for the period of time your base salary was reduced.  
If, on or prior to the Expiration Date, your employment is terminated under circumstances that would entitle you to severance payments pursuant to Section 9(d) of your Employment Agreement, your “Base Salary” for purposes of Section 9(d)(iii) shall be equal to your Normal Base Salary.  In addition, any bonus or equity award that you may be entitled to with respect to the period that your base salary is reduced will be determined with reference to your Normal Base Salary, as though the reduction in your base salary had not occurred.
You hereby agree that the reduction of your base salary provided for in this letter agreement will not constitute “Good Reason” within the meaning of your Employment Agreement and will not constitute a breach of your Employment Agreement.
Except for the changes to your base salary described in this letter agreement, the provisions of your Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Photographic copies of such signed counterparts may be used in lieu of the originals for any purpose.
We appreciate your dedication to the Company.
GUESS?, INC.


/s/ Jason T. Miller                                                               
By:  Jason T. Miller    
Title:  General Counsel
Acknowledged and Agreed:
By:    /s/ Carlos Alberini                                                        
Carlos Alberini
Date:    March 30, 2020