alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, March 22, 2007.

# Place:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter                         *United Mine Workers of America on behalf of Local 1248, District 2*                         v.                         *Maple Creek Mining, Inc.*, Docket No. PENN 2002-23-C. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in denying the operator's motion for summary decision on the ground that a withdrawal order issued to the operator pursuant to section 104(b) of the Mine Act could not be contested pursuant to section 105(a), and thus became final for purposes of the compensation provisions of section 111 when it was not contested under section 105(d) within 30 days of its issuance.)                    

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.

# Contact Person for more Information:

Jean Ellen; (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sandra G. Farrow,

Acting Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 07-1401 Filed 3-19-07; 11:54 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. FALANA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3482

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; J. Rogers 

Padgett, Senior Judge, and Nick 

Nazaretian, Judge.

Michael A. Falana, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Allen v. State, 599 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 1992); Copeland v. 

State, 118 So. 3d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Lett v. State, 805 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2001) (en banc).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                        STATE OR OTHER
                                                        JURISDICTION OF PERCENTAGE
SUBSIDIARIES ON JULY 31, 1998                             ORGANIZATION     OWNED
-----------------------------                           --------------- ----------
<S>                                                     <C>              <C> 
Professional Software Consultants, Inc. ................   Arizona          100%
Computec International Strategic Resources, Inc. .......   California       100%
Computec International Resources (Australia) PTY LTD
 (subsidiary of Computec International Strategic
 Resources, Inc.).......................................   Australia        100%
Leardata Info-Services, Inc. ...........................   Texas            100%
SelecTech, Inc. ........................................   Illinois         100%
EXi Corp. ..............................................   Minnesota        100%
</TABLE>
#### § 80.2 Application of this regulation.

This regulation applies to any program to which Federal financial assistance is authorized to be extended to a recipient under a law administered by the Department, including the Federal financial assistance listed in appendix A to this part. It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the effective date of the regulation pursuant to an application approved prior to such effective date. This regulation does not apply to (a) any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contracts, (b) money paid, property transferred, or other assistance extended before the effective date of this regulation, (c) the use of any assistance by any individual who is the ultimate beneficiary under any such program, or (d) any employment practice, under any such program, or any employer, employment agency, or labor organization, except to the extent described in § 80.3. The fact that a type of Federal assistance is not listed in appendix A to this part shall not mean, if title VI of the Act is otherwise applicable, that a program is not covered. Federal financial assistance under statutes now in force or hereinafter enacted may be added to this list by notice published in the Federal Register.

(Secs. 602, 604, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 253 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1, 2000d-3))

[38 FR 17979, July 5, 1973, as amended at 70 FR 24318, May 9, 2005]
Memorandum

November 19, 2015

To: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0204

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region 9, Air Planning Office

Subject: Conference Calls with Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach on EPA’s 

Proposed Approval of South Coast 2006 PM2.5 Moderate Area Attainment 

Plan and Reclassification (80 FR 63640, October 20, 2015)

Attendees:

EPA, OAR: Deborah Jordan, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the Acting Assistant 

Administrator

EPA Region 9: Elizabeth Adams, Acting Director, Air Division

Nina Spiegelman, Office of Regional Counsel

Jeanhee Hong, Office of Regional Counsel

Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office

Port of Los Angeles: David Libatique; Eve O’Toole; Rich Gold; Gene Seroka

Port of Long Beach: Michael Christensen

City of Los Angeles: Joy Crose

EPA held a conference call on November 2, 2015 with David Libatique and Joy Crose, at 

their request, to discuss their questions concerning EPA’s October 20, 2015 proposed action 

on the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) moderate area attainment 

plan for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and proposed reclassification to Serious. Ms. Crose and Mr. 

Libatique asked EPA to explain the reason for EPA’s proposal to approve the SCAQMD’s 

commitment concerning backstop measures for ports and port-related facilities. EPA 

explained the Agency’s role in the state implementation plan process under the Clean Air 

Act and noted that the Agency would consider public comments and any necessary 

clarifications before taking final action. Ms. Crose also expressed concern about the lack of

opportunity for the ports to comment on the District’s commitment. EPA encouraged the 

ports to submit comments during EPA’s pending public comment period on this proposed 

action.

EPA held a second meeting/call on November 6, 2015 with representatives of the Port of 

Los Angeles (POLA) and Port of Long Beach (POLB), at their request, to discuss the same 

proposed action. Representatives of the ports expressed their desire to continue the 

ongoing collaborative approach to reducing emissions at POLA and POLB and indicated that 

the adoption of a backstop rule could cause the collaboration approach to fail. EPA again 

encouraged the ports to submit comments during EPA’s pending public comment period on 

this proposed action.

Attachment: Attendee List, November 6, 2015 EPA-Ports of LA/LB meeting
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Michael P. Connors as true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power (including the full power of substitution and resubstitution) to sign for him and in his name, place and stead, in the
capacity or capacities set forth below, (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 to be filed by Information Services
Group, Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) any
amendments to the foregoing Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Commission, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signature

Title

Date/s/ ROBERT J. CHRENC Robert J. Chrenc

Director

March 3, 2010/s/ GERALD S. HOBBS Gerald S. Hobbs

Director

March 3, 2010/s/ KALPANA RAINA Kalpana Raina

Director

March 3, 2010/s/ DONALD C. WAITE III Donald C. Waite III

Director

March 3, 2010/s/ ROBERT E. WEISSMAN Robert E. Weissman

Director

March 3, 2010


---



QuickLinks
WELLS                                              Corporate Trust Services
FARGO                                              MAC N2702-011
                                                   9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                   Columbia, MD 21045
                                                   410 884-2000
                                                   410 715-2380 Fax

                                                   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 15, 2007

American Home Mortgage Assets, LLC.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust
2006-4

Per Section 3.21 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 8/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
     or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement
     or such other applicable agreement in the case of any Servicing Function
     Participant engaged by it, has been made under such officer's supervision
     and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of any Servicing Function Participant
     engaged by it, in all material respects throughout such year or portion
     thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation
     in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such
     officer and the nature and status thereof.










Certified By:                           Certified By:
/S/Kristen Ann Cronin                   /S/Gordon Johnson
----------------------------------      ----------------------------------
KRISTEN ANN CRONIN, VICE PRESIDENT      Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
§ 5.29 How may I request assistance with the FOIA process? ( a ) If you have questions concerning the processing of your FOIA request, you should first contact the FOIA Requester Service Center processing your request. Additionally, for assistance at any point in the FOIA process, you may contact the FOIA Public Liaison at the FOIA Requester Service Center processing your request. The FOIA Public Liaison is responsible for assisting you to reduce delays, increasing transparency and understanding of the status of requests, and assisting to resolve any FOIA disputes. Some FOIA Requester Service Centers allow you to check the status of your request online. You can find a list of our FOIA Requester Service Centers and Public Liaisons at *http://www.hhs.gov/foia/contacts/index.html .*
( b ) The Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), which is part of the National Archives and Records Administration, serves as the Federal FOIA ombudsman and assists requesters and agencies to prevent and resolve FOIA disputes through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process. If we participate in the dispute resolution services provided by OGIS, we will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute and will follow the principles of confidentiality in accordance with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, 5 U.S.C. 571-8. You may contact OGIS at the following address: National Archives and Records Administration, Office of Government Information Services, 8601 Adelphi Road—OGIS, College Park, MD 20740-6001, or by email at *ogis@nara.gov ,* or by telephone at 202-741-5770 or 1-877-684-6448 (toll free).
Exhibit 32.2



                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                            18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                 SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Flexxtech  Corporation,  (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael  A. Novielli, Chairman and Interim CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant
To 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/  Michael  Novielli
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael  Novielli
                                  Interim Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  August  18,  2003
- 1781
- 1782
Exhibit 32.1

March 16,
2010
Via EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of MV Oil Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A.
Trustee for MV Oil TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Mike Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,305
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,507
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,642
<PP&E>                                         60,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 749,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,577
<BONDS>                                        400,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   749,813
<SALES>                                        77,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               77,463
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  72,318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,572)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
§ 86.36 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient which uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials which permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)
§ 84.89 Effect of noncompliance that has a minimal impact on access. A recipient that is not in full compliance with the requirements of § 84.84(b) will be deemed to have met the requirements of § 84.84 in the limited circumstance in which the recipient can demonstrate that the noncompliance has such a minimal impact on access that it would not affect the ability of individuals with disabilities to use the recipient's web content or mobile app to do any of the following in a manner that provides substantially equivalent timeliness, privacy, independence, and ease of use: ( a ) Access the same information as individuals without disabilities;
( b ) Engage in the same interactions as individuals without disabilities;
( c ) Conduct the same transactions as individuals without disabilities; and
( d ) Otherwise participate in or benefit from the same programs and activities as individuals without disabilities.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# Time and Date:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, January 9, 2007.

# Place:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

The one item is open to the public.

# Matter to be Considered:

                        7695B,                         *Aircraft Accident Report*                        —Crash of Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701, Bombardier CL-600-2B19, N8396A, Jefferson City, Missouri, October 14, 2004.                    

# News Media Contact:

Terry Williams: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, January 5, 2007.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: December 29, 2006.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-9990  Filed 12-29-06; 12:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
Opinion issued August 20, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 0 0585
- CR

——————————— IN RE LONNIE HENRY RECTOR, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Lonnie Henry Rector, Jr., incarcerated and proceeding pro se , has
filed a n application for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent district judge to rule on relator’ s motion for forensic DNA testing, pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

. 1

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Lonnie Henry Rector, Jr. , Cause No. 714415 , i n the 262nd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Lori Chambers Gray presiding. This Court previously d ismissed for want of jurisdiction relator’s two prior mandamus petition s . See In re Rector , No. 01

- 18

- 0 1144

- CR, 201 9 WL 30 2 785 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 24, 2019 ,2

W e construe relator’s application as a petition for a writ of mandamus and deny it

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a), (d). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).

orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication); In re Rector , No. 01

- 18

- 01102

- CR, 2018 WL 6694792 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 20, 2018, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
#### § 95.28 What a waiver request for good cause must include.

The State's request for waiver must include a specific explanation, justification or documentation of why the claim is or will be late. This request must establish that the lateness in filing the claim is for good cause as defined in § 95.22 and not due to neglect or administrative inadequacy. If the claim has not been filed, the State must also tell us when the claim will be filed.