alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of San West, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010, I, Frank J. Drechsler, Chief Financial Officer of San West, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of San West, Inc.

Dated: November 11, 2010

/s/ Frank J. Drechsler

Frank J. Drechsler, Chief Financial Officer of
San West, Inc.
#### § 402.25 Appeals.

Appeals under this Subpart will be subject to 45 CFR part 16, Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals Board.
Script for _Be Food Safe_ For Holiday Buffets

file:///C|/Users/mames/Desktop/gpo14673/Script%20for%20_Be%20Food%20Safe_%20For%20Holiday%20Buffets.htm[12/31/2013 2:20:51 PM]

FSIS

INTRO: The U.S. Department of Agriculture's "Be Food Safe"

message is important during the holiday party season. USDA's

Patrick O'Leary has more. 

TAG: For a free copy of "Cooking for Groups" write FCIC, 604-H,

Pueblo, CO 81009. 

Pat O'Leary, USDA (voice-over): Hosting a holiday party requires

good cheer, but also expertise in preparing food for large groups.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's "Be Food Safe" campaign can

help prevent foodborne illness from ruining your buffet. 

Kathy Bernard, USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline: It all starts with

"Clean, Separate, Cook and Chill." They're the four basics of safe

food preparation. Clean is washing your hands, cutting surfaces and

utensils. Separate raw and cooked foods so you don't cross

contaminate. Cook food thoroughly and check the temperature with

a food thermometer—165 degrees Fahrenheit for poultry and

casseroles, 160 degrees Fahrenheit for ground beef; and then chill

leftovers within 2 hours. 

O'Leary, USDA (voice-over): The experts say for holiday buffets

keep hot food hot and cold food cold. 

Bernard: If you're transporting cooked food from one location to

another, you want to keep it hot by carrying it in an insulated

container. If you're transporting cold foods, use a cooler with ice or a

commercial freezing gel, then place it on ice on the buffet. Chafing

dishes, warming trays and slow cookers are all fine to keep hot

foods hot. But you don't want to re-heat in them. They're just for

maintaining that reheated temperature. Make sure to heat foods to

at least 165 degrees Fahrenheit. 

O'Leary, USDA (voice-over): You should also beware of raw eggs:

never eat raw cookie dough and if you're serving eggnog made with

raw eggs, make it safely from a cooked egg-milk mixture, heating

gently until it reaches 160 degrees Fahrenheit on a food

thermometer. Or serve pasteurized eggnog. For more information

call the USDA's Meat and Poultry Hotline at 1-888-MPHotline, or ask

a food safety question at AskKaren.gov. For the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, I'm Pat O'Leary.

Last Modified May 31, 2013

About FSIS District Offices Careers Contact Us Ask Karen askFSIS En Español

FSIS Home | USDA.gov | FoodSafety.gov | USA.gov | Whitehouse.gov | Site Map | Policies & Links | Significant Guidance | FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | 

Non-Discrimination Statement | Civil Rights | No FEAR | Information Quality
Document

EXHIBIT 10.3




I confirm that I have been informed of and fully understand the material negative impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on the business and financial health of my employer and its affiliates, including its ultimate parent, PVH Corp. I understand that, notwithstanding the foregoing, I will receive the pay out of my fiscal 2019 bonus no later than April 30, 2020. I acknowledge that there will be no merit increases of salary and, further, accept the reduction of my base salary for a period of no less than three months and no more than six months, starting in connection with the work week that commences on April 13, 2020 and ending in connection with the work week that ends on October 18, 2020. I understand that this decrease in my base salary will end in connection with the first pay period that starts at least 30 days after at least 80% of our company-operated stores in the U.S. and Canada return to regular operation. I acknowledge that my fiscal 2020 bonus payout opportunities, when bonuses are established, will be 50% of the payout opportunities that were set in connection with my fiscal 2019 bonus award at each of the threshold, target and maximum award levels or, if I was recently promoted, 50% of the payout opportunities last year at each of the threshold, target and maximum award levels that others in my new salary grade received. I hereby waive any claim I might have under my employment agreement or other document governing my employment, applicable law or otherwise and release my employer and its affiliates, including but not limited to PVH Corp., from any liability with respect to each of the foregoing. I understand that in all other instances, my employment agreement (or other document governing my employment) remains in full force and effect and the terms of my employment are unchanged, including its “at-will” nature.


Signature for acceptance:


                    
_________________________
Name




              
_________________________
Date
wews From.@7 6089201 Ab>9

FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION

1325 K Street, N.W.,Washington, D.c. 20463

RELEASE: ON RECEIPT CONTACT: DAVID FISKE
=] SUSAN TIFFT
OF INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES (202) 382-4112

WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 27 - An index released by the Federal Election Commission today reveals
that over $1.3 million has been spent as "independent expenditures" for or against 65 Federal
candidates in the 1976 elections. . :

The 12-page index, itemizing "independent expenditures" by candidate, was compiled by
the FEC from reports filed with it through the October 10 quarterly report.

The index shows that 324 separate individuals, political committees, or other groups. of.
individuals reported making $1,215,139 in independent expenditures and $102,907 in independen'
contributions. Seventy percent (70%) or $923,562, of the independent expenditures and
contributions reported exceeded $10,000.

"Tndependent: expenditures," which are expenditures "expressly advocating the election or
defeat of a clearly identified candidate" may not be made in cooperation with a candidate, and

are reported seperately by the expending person.
Details from the report include the following:

Those. candidates on whose:.behalf: there “have ‘been the greatest amount of independent
expenditute ‘activity-are: :

INDEPENDENT - INDEPENDENT .
CANDIDATE CONTRIBUTION EXPENDITURE . TOTAL

Ronald Reagan $21,262 $608,932 $630,194
Gerald Ford $ 1,200 $179,751 i $180,951
Hubert Humphrey $ 75,093 . $ 75,093
Henry M. Jackson $ 66,821 $ 66,821
Lloyd Bentsen $ 58,796 $ 58,796
Jimmy Carter $ 45,642 $ 45,642
Jerry Litton $ 26,820 $ 26,820
Frank Church $ 26,056 $ 26,056
Joseph Tydings $ 25,4214 in opposition to) $ 25,421*
Birch Bayh $ 23,014 . ~ $723,014"

The individuals, groups and political committees making the greatest independent expenditures 4
contributions are: Y

PERSON CANDIDATE TOTAL -

American Conservative Union Ronald Reagan $173,496
Friends for Reagan Committee Ronald Reagan $ 63,655
Henry C. (Hank) Grover Ronald Reagan
Humphry for President Committee Hubert Humphrey
Texas Friends of Ronald Reagan Ronald
Edvar2 P. Tew lant
* Jerry Litton
Ford for President - California Gerald Ford
Joseph Coors Ronald Reagan
Friends of the First Family Gerald For
Labor for Jackson Henry Jackson
Sheetmetal Workers’ Intnl. Assoc. PAL Henry Jackson: «
UAW-V-CAP Carter,.Metze!
Houston Area Delegates for Reagan Ronald: Reagan’
Citizens Against Tydings . Joseph ‘Tyding
Delegates for Reagan Comm. Ft. Worth Ronald Reagan

Texas 4 .
Ronald Reagan Delegate Comm. Dallas Tx. Ronald Reagan
Bentsen in the 16th Committee Lloyd Bentsen

Labor for Bayh Committee Birch Bayh

-30-
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Next 1 Interactive, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Teresa McWilliams, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Dated:
      June 24, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Teresa
      McWilliamsTeresa
      McWilliams
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,052
<SECURITIES>                                   190,373
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               287,366
<PP&E>                                         192,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 555,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   555,316
<SALES>                                        215,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,476
<CGS>                                          179,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (19,010)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,974)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.94)


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

R TD Construction, Inc. 

Under Contract No. NNK12CA59C 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60434 

Edward J. Kinberg, Esq. 

Widerman Malek, PL 

Melbourne, FL 

Scott W. Barber, Esq. 

NASA Chief Trial Attorney 

Richard J. McCarthy, Esq. 

Senior Attorney 

NASA Headquarters 

Washington, DC 

Ellen E. Espenschied, Esq. 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

Kennedy Space Center, FL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 6 January 2016 

DA YID D' ALESSANDRIS 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60434, Appeal ofRTD Construction, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
----

----

|   | (i) | the                Report, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and, |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 12, 2006 | /s/                Michael                Michie                                   |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Michael                Michie                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                               | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |

----
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2nd. A correction was made to add the “What You 

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in 

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2, 2015

Mr. Ron C. Christenson

1595 Clemson Rd. 

Reno, Nevada 89502

Dear Mr. Christenson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 1, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0876), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# Senate Floor Activity - Tuesday, June 10, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Tuesday, June 10)

H.Con.Res. 100

S. 1254

S. 2432

## Executive Business (Tuesday, June 10)

PN1229

 179

PN1232

 180

PN1342

 184

PN1344

 182

PN1346

 181

PN1350

 183

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
#### § 3.25 Servicing of vehicles.

A person may not wash, polish, change oil, lubricate, or make nonemergency repairs on a privately owned vehicle.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04598**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04598\04598_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04598\04598_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04598\04598_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04598\04598_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04598\04598_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04598\04598_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04598\Certification Statement Plant ID 04598.pdf Plant certification statement x 04598\Follow-up and resubmittals\1st review_response_email.pdf Follow-up and resubmittal material for the survey. x 04598\Follow-up and resubmittals\East Bend Part B Section 7.xlsx Follow-up and resubmittal material for the survey. x 04598\Follow-up and resubmittals\East Bend Part D Section 3.2 Pond A.xlsx Follow-up and resubmittal material for the survey. x 04598\Follow-up and resubmittals\East_Bend_Followup_04598 Response.pdf Follow-up and resubmittal material for the survey. x 04598\Follow-up and resubmittals\East_Bend_Followup_04598.doc Follow-up and resubmittal material for the survey. x 04598\Supplemental Documents\04598_East Bend A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04598\Supplemental Documents\04598_EB APGWA Combined Assessment.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04598\Supplemental Documents\04598_Part D 4.1 SPD-A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04598\Supplemental Documents\East Bend A5-3 and D3-1 rev 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04598\04598_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 04598\04598_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04598\04598_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04598\04598 (02550)_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2008121EN.01000401.xml

| 17.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 121/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 1.4.2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 233/07 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Valencia |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ayudas Públicas-Valencia-Ayudas de la Generalitat de Valencia para el Fomento de I+D+i |
| Legal basis | — |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Research and development, Regional development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 25 million
  Overall budget: EUR 175 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration | 1.7.2007-31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | IMPIVA, Generalitat Valenciana |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

1.4.2008

Reference number of the aid

N 233/07

Member State

Spain

Region

Valencia

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ayudas Públicas-Valencia-Ayudas de la Generalitat de Valencia para el Fomento de I+D+i

Legal basis

—

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Research and development, Regional development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 25 million

Overall budget: EUR 175 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration

1.7.2007-31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

IMPIVA, Generalitat Valenciana

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
#### § 109.559 Explosives and radioactive materials.

Except as authorized by the master or person in charge, no person may use explosives or radioactive materials and equipment on a unit.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TIMOTHY KERRIGAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, Case No. 14-cv-12693 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

VISALUS, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO 

EXCLUDE E. ALLEN JACOBS’ EXPERT REPORT (ECF #125) 

 On February 24, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion to exclude the report of 

Defendants’ expert witness E. Allen Jacobs. (See ECF #125.) Since Plaintiffs filed 

that motion, there have been substantial procedural developments in this action that 

will require Plaintiffs to update and re-file their motion, if necessary. Accordingly, 

as discussed with counsel, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: September 27, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on September 27, 2018, by electronic means 

and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID B. SWARTOUT,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-CV-12768

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

RUTH JOHNSON,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On September 24, 2014, this matter came before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for

a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction [docket entry 12]. A hearing was held

and oral argument heard. For the reasons stated on the record,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and a

preliminary injunction is denied.

__s/ Bernard A. Friedman_____

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 24, 2014

Detroit, Michigan

2:14-cv-12768-BAF-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 251