alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Index for 

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0881] 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, 

State of California, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 

New Source Review

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

§ SIP submittal letter from CARB dated May 19, 2011 I-A 

§ Rule 2201 amended on April 21, 2011 – Clean Copy I-B 

§ Rule 2201 amended on April 21, 2011 – Strikeout I-C 

§ SJVUAPCD, Final Staff Report, Proposed Amendments to Rule 2201, 

April 21, 2011 

I-D 

§ SIP submittal letter from CARB dated September 28, 2011 I-E 

§ Rule 2020 amended on August 18, 2011 – Clean Copy I-F 

§ Rule 2020 amended on September 28, 2011 – Strikeout I-G 

§ SJVUAPCD, Final Staff Report, Proposed Amendments to Rule 2020, 

August 18, 2011 

I-H 

II. Federal Register Notices

§ 75 FR 26102 (May 11, 2010) II-A 

III. Other Relevant Documents

§ Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule 2201 dated October 25, 2011 III-A 

§ Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule 2020 dated October 25, 2011 III-B 

§ Technical Support Document for Rules 2020 and 2021 III-C 

IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents

§ NPRM 76 FR 76112 (December 6, 2011) IV-A 

§ Interim Final Rule 76 FR 76046 (December 6, 2011) IV-B 

V. Comment Letters on Proposed Action

§
§ 400.9 Administrative review of decisions on approval of State plans and plan amendments. ( a ) Any State dissatisfied with a determination by the Director, or his or her designee, under § 400.8 with respect to any plan or plan amendment may, within 60 days after the date of notification of such determination, file a petition with the Director, or designee, for reconsideration of the determination.
( b ) A State may request that a hearing be held, but it is not required to do so.
( c ) If a State requests a hearing, the Director, or designee, will notify the State within 30 days after receipt of such a petition, of the time and location of the hearing to reconsider the issue.
( d ) The hearing must be held not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days after the date the notice of the hearing is furnished to the State, unless the Director, or designee, and the State agree in writing on another time.
( e ) The hearing procedures in part 213 of this title will be used except that: ( 1 ) “The Director” is substituted where there is a reference to “the Administrator,” and
( 2 ) “ORR Hearing Clerk” is substituted where there is reference to the “SRS Hearing Clerk.”
( f ) The Director will affirm, modify, or reverse the original decisions within 60 days of the receipt of the State's petition or, if a hearing is held, within 60 days after the hearing.
( g ) The initial determination by the Director, or designee, that a plan or amendment is not approvable shall remain in effect pending the reconsideration.
( h ) If the Director reverses the original decision, ORR will reimburse any funds incorrectly withheld or otherwise denied.
[51 FR 3913, Jan. 30, 1986]
1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

)

CHRIS RUFER, ET AL., ) No. 14-5240

) Consolidated with No. 14-5241

Appellants, )

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Appellee. )

_______________________________________)

JOINT DISMISSAL AGREEMENT

All parties in the above-captioned case respectfully submit this dismissal agreement, 

requesting voluntary dismissal of this matter without prejudice or condition, pursuant to Fed. R. 

App. P. 42(b) or, if this Court deems it appropriate, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). They are 

simultaneously filing a stipulation in the district court to dismiss the underlying lawsuit that gave 

rise to these proceedings. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), the parties have agreed that each side is to bear its own 

costs, if any, and that no outstanding fees are due. 

The FEC agrees to this dismissal based on its position that, by doing so, it does not waive 

any rights or arguments that may apply in future cases. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Lisa J. Stevenson /s/ Michael T. Morley 

Kevin Deeley Michael T. Morley, DC Bar #492716

Harry J. Summers COOLIDGE-REAGAN FOUNDATION

Seth Nesin 1629 K Street, Suite 300

Greg J. Mueller Washington, DC 200061

 

1

Permanent address on file is 223 Pawnee Road, Cranford, N.J. 07016.

USCA Case #14-5240 Document #1524857 Filed: 12/02/2014 Page 1 of 2
2

/s/ Charles Kitcher Phone: (860) 778-3883

Charles Kitcher Michael@coolidgereagan.org

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, N.W. Danielle Frisa*

Washington, D.C. 20463 SHAHLA PC

Counsel for Defendant FEC 708 Main Street, Suite 430

Houston, TX 77002

Phone: (713) 497-5133

Danielle@shahlapc.com 

*Admitted pro hac vice

Counsel for Appellants Chris Rufer, and 

Libertarian National Congressional 

Committee Inc., and Libertarian Party of 

Indiana

Dated December 2, 2014

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Michael T. Morley, hereby certify that on this 2nd day of December, 2014, I did cause 

a true and complete copy of the foregoing Joint Dismissal Agreement to be filed with the 

CM/ECF system of this Court, which caused a copy of this document to be served via e-mail on 

the following individuals:

Kevin Andrew Deeley KDeeley@fec.gov

Harry Jacobs Summers HSummers@fec.gov

Greg Mueller GMueller@fec.gov

Seth Edward Nesin SNesin@fec.gov

Charles P. Kitcher CKitcher@fec.gov

Counsel for Defendant FEC

James Bopp, Jr. jbopp@bopplaw.com

Randy Elf relf@bopplaw.com

Richard Eugene Coleson rcoleson@bopplaw.com

Counsel for Republican National 

Committee, Reince Priebus, 

Republican Party of Louisiana, 

Jefferson Parish Republican Parish

Executive Comm., Orleans Parish

Republican Executive Comm., Roger

Villere, Jr.

/s/ Michael T. Morley 

Michael T. Morley, DC Bar #492716

USCA Case #14-5240 Document #1524857 Filed: 12/02/2014 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5125-N-10] 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 9, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                 

Dated: March 1, 2007. 

Mark R. Johnston, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs. 

[FR Doc. 07-1002 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
# C_2008002EN.01000201.xml

| 5.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/2

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 2/02)

| Aid No | XE 29/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | Dolnośląskie |
| Title of aid scheme | Program pomocy w zakresie zatrudnienia w ramach wyłączeń grupowych dla przedsiębiorców tworzących nowe miejsca pracy na terenie Gminy Miasto Świdnica |
| Legal basis | Art. 7 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 12 stycznia 1991 r. o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (tekst jednolity z 2006 r. Dz.U. nr 121, poz. 844 ze zmianami) |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,263852 million; overall budget: — |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)—(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 26.5.2007 |
| Duration | 30.6.2008 |
| Objective | Art. 4: Creation of employment |
| Economic sectors | All Community sectors  (1)eligible for employment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Gmina Miasto Świdnica/Urząd Miejski w Świdnicy |
| ul. Armii Krajowej 49 |
| PL-58-100 Świdnica |

Aid No

XE 29/07

Member State

Poland

Region

Dolnośląskie

Title of aid scheme

Program pomocy w zakresie zatrudnienia w ramach wyłączeń grupowych dla przedsiębiorców tworzących nowe miejsca pracy na terenie Gminy Miasto Świdnica

Legal basis

Art. 7 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 12 stycznia 1991 r. o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (tekst jednolity z 2006 r. Dz.U. nr 121, poz. 844 ze zmianami)

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,263852 million; overall budget: —

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)—(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

26.5.2007

Duration

30.6.2008

Objective

Art. 4: Creation of employment

Economic sectors

All Community sectors  (1)eligible for employment aid

1

Name and address of the granting authority

Gmina Miasto Świdnica/Urząd Miejski w Świdnicy

ul. Armii Krajowej 49

PL-58-100 Świdnica

---

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.

1

---
On-Site Safety Checklist for Skyhigh Video and 

Photography LLC

Pre-flight 



Reviewed targeted area through Google Earth for any obstructions 



Reviewed area for any FAA restricted fly zones or other areas of concern 



Reviewed safety requirements with sponsor / owner (sign-off required back 

of form) 



Posted “Aerial Photography” in process sign at opening / curb 



Visit each neighbor to announce that aerial photography will be taking 

place 



Posted “Launch/Landing” zone sign calling for 50’ parameter 



Walked the hover area or path of flight to check for any areas on concern 

Flight Set-up 



Advise anyone within “Launch/Landing” area of safety and 50’ requirement 



Unpack and check DJI Phantom 3 Professional for any visible signs of 

damage 



Turn on Remote Controller and observe that both power and Wi-Fi are 

green 



Ensure launch zone is clear and turn on DJI Phantom 3 Professional battery 


Toggle S1 & S2 switches five times to set GPS recalc & failsafe landing zone 



Wait for solid GPS lights (Solid Green slow flashing) 



Spin DJI Phantom 3 Professional 360o both Horizontal and Vertically to 

ensure lock 



Review Launch Site one last time before lift off 



Engage motors and start straight horizontal lift to desired altitude 

Flight 



Monitor both GPS Lock (# satellites) / Battery Level every minute 



Watch for any changes to the “Launch/Landing” area of safety and advise 

as necessary 



Watch for any irregular craft behavior and land immediately if necessary 



Return the craft to the landing area within 20% of battery life 

Post-Flight 



Announce that the craft is returning for landing 



Visual check that the 50’ rule is observed / Otherwise hover until 50’ is 

observed 



Slowly bring the DJI Phantom 3 Professional in for a landing 



Turn off Battery on Craft first, then the Remote Controller 



Store all equipment in their cases before allowing observes to approach
<PAGE>   1

                       [HENRY & PETERS, PC LETTERHEAD]

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.


We consent to the use of our report dated October 22, 1998, on the consolidated 
financial statements of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of 
September 30, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the years in the three-year period 
ended September 30, 1998, in Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the
year ended  September 30, 1998.


                                   /s/ HENRY & PETERS, P.C.
                                   ----------------------------
                                   HENRY & PETERS, P.C.



Tyler, Texas
December 17, 1998
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 

 ) 

CHRISTOPHER VAN HOLLEN, JR., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 1:11-766 (ABJ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) STATUS REPORT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

STATUS REPORT OF DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Pursuant to the Court’s Order of September 20, 2012 (Docket No. 66), the Federal 

Election Commission hereby advises that it does not intend to pursue a rulemaking and that it 

will continue to defend 11 C.F.R. § 104.20(c)(9) before the Court. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Anthony Herman 

General Counsel 

David Kolker (D.C. Bar No. 394558) 

Associate General Counsel 

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) 

Special Counsel to the General Counsel 

Harry J. Summers 

Assistant General Counsel 

Holly J. Baker 

Attorney 

/s/ Seth Nesin 

Seth Nesin 

Attorney 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 67 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 2
2

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Telephone: (202) 694-1650 

Fax: (202) 219-0260 

October 4, 2012 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 67 Filed 10/04/12 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00024-CR 

Daniel William Mohler 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From Criminal District Court No. 3 

of Tarrant County (1345064D) 

September 29, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Gardner 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner__________________ 

 Justice Anne Gardner
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Petty, AtLee and Senior Judge Clements 

ESPERANZA M. GARCIA-GUZMAN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 0851-15-4 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 20, 2015 

CELINA CLEANING SERVICES, INC. AND 

 THE UNINSURED EMPLOYERS’ FUND 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Brian Patrick Riley; Antezana & Antezana, LLC, on briefs), for 

appellant. 

 (Richard F. Boddie; Slocum & Boddie, P.C., on brief), for appellee 

Celina Cleaning Services, Inc. 

 (Joshua M. Wulf; David A. Obuchowicz; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, 

P.C., on brief), for appellee The Uninsured Employers’ Fund. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

 Esperanza M. Garcia-Guzman appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission denying her claim for benefits and finding that she failed to establish her injury 

arose out of her employment. On appeal, claimant contends the commission erred in: (1) relying 

on her failure to describe any defect or substance on the floor where the accident occurred as a 

reason for finding she failed to sustain her burden in proving her injury arose out of her 

employment; (2) relying on her failure to describe the cause of her fall to Celina Cleaning 

Services, Inc. or to medical professionals as a reason for finding she failed to sustain her burden 

of proof; and (3) finding that the only evidence supporting her version of events was her 

uncorroborated testimony where there was an adverse witness who provided corroborating 

UNPUBLISHED 
- 2 - 

testimony for her version of events. Claimant also asserts she may raise these assignments of 

error on appeal pursuant to Code § 8.01-384(A). 

 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Garcia-Guzman v. Celina Cleaning Servs., Inc., VWC File No. VA02000014786 

(Apr. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
§ 84.45 Housing. ( a ) *Housing provided by the recipient.* A recipient that provides housing to its students without disabilities shall provide comparable, convenient, and accessible housing to students with disabilities at the same cost as to others. At the end of the transition period provided for in subpart C of this part, such housing shall be available in sufficient quantity and variety so that the scope of students with disabilities' choice of living accommodations is, as a whole, comparable to that of students without disabilities.
( b ) *Other housing.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students shall take such action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing is, as a whole, made available in a manner that does not result in discrimination on the basis of disability.
[42 FR 22677, May 4, 1977, as amended at 89 FR 40187, May 9, 2024]
§ 618.545 Pre-employment inquiries. ( a ) *Marital status.* A recipient shall not make pre-employment inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for employment, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.”
( b ) *Sex.* A recipient may make pre-employment inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for employment, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17039-17040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07379]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a live Board meeting of the State Energy 
Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463; 86 Stat.770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: April 28, 2015 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; April 29, 2015 9:00 a.m. 
to 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Garden Inn Austin Downtown/Convention Center, 500 N 
Interstate 35, Austin, TX 78701

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Neukomm, Policy Advisor, Office 
of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, 
1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. Phone number 202-287-
5189, and email monica.neukomm@ee.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Meet with and hear from members of the Austin 
Technology Incubator, receive updates and information from ERCOT 
regarding demand response and transmission planning, meet with staff 
from Austin Energy, hear from EERE and DOE staff regarding updates on 
the new Office of Technology Transitions, explore opportunities to 
continue assisting with the QER year 2 process, discuss updates and 
provide recommendations on the Weatherization Assistance Program, tour 
the Mueller site and the Pecan Street sites, and update members of the 
Board on routine business matters.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Monica Neukomm at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.

[[Page 17040]]

    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 90 days on the STEAB Web site, www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on March 25, 2015.
LaTanya Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-07379 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### Daniel Goldschmidt, *Respondent, v.*John C. Wilmerding and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0348.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 10:25PM ----- To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/12/2010 02:40PM cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Some comments on the RIA

Hi Melanie, Attached is a pdf of some redline comments on the RIA. Please let me know if you have any questions about these comments.

Regards, Cortney

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0348.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM
5:14-cr-20381-JCO-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 03/04/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 7
§ 81.31 Form of documents to be filed. Documents to be filed under the rules in this part shall be dated, the original signed in ink, shall show the docket description and title of the proceeding, and shall show the title, if any, and address of the signatory. Copies need not be signed but the name of the person signing the original shall be reproduced. Documents shall be legible and shall not be more than 81 ⁄ 2 inches wide and 12 inches long.
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

 Exhibit A Expert Rebuttal Report of Cyril Moscow 

 Exhibit B Rebuttal Report of David Tabak 

Case 2:02-cv-72004-GCS-VMM ECF No. 425-2, PageID.6590 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 1
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Angel Moreno Gonzalez, * From the 220th District Court

 of Comanche County,

 Trial Court No. 00-01-02203-CCCR.

Vs. No. 11-17-00056-CR * March 31, 2017

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.