alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

In the Matter of 

BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC, 

) FAA Docket No. not yet assigned 

) FAA Case No.: 2011EA170024 

) 

) 

) 

) ANS~RTOAMENDEDCOMWL~ 

Responden~ 

) 

) 

Comes now the Respondent, Brendan Airways, LLC d/b/a USA 3000 Airlines 

[hereinafter "USA 3000"] and ANSWERS the Administrator's AMENDED COMPLAINT in 

this matter, and offers the Respondent's affirmative defenses. 

I. ANSWER 

1. Paragraph 1 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

2. Paragraph 2 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

3. Paragraph 3 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 

4. Paragraph 4 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

5. Paragraph 5 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

6. Paragraph 6 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

7. Paragraph 7 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

8. Paragraph 8 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 

RESPONDENT USA 3000 

ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Page 1 

Washington Aviation Gronp, PC and the 

Law Offices of Jason A. Dickstein 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 503 

Washington, DC 20007 ·Tel: 202-628-6776 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

RE: Brendan Airways, LLC, FAA Case Number: 2011EA170024. 

The undersigned hereby certifies that she caused the attached 

ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

to be filed/served on the persons at the addresses listed below by pre-paid First Class Certified 

Mail, Return Receipt Requested, on the date indicated below. 

Federal Aviation Administration (original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

The Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Zachary M. Berman, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

!Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

RESPONDENT USA 3000 

ANSWERTOAMENDEDCOMPLMNT 

PageS 

March 12 2012 

Date 

Washington Aviation Group, PC and the 

Law Offices of Jason A. Dickstein 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 503 

Washington. DC 20007 • Tel: 202-628-6776
#### In the Matter of William Doll

Order to show cause granted.
Exhibit 32.1
                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                            18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                 SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Network  Installation
Corporation,  (the "Company") on  Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended September
30, 2003, as filed with  the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Michael  Cummings,  Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/  Michael  Cummings
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael  Cummings
                                  Chief  Executive  Officer


Dated:  November  13,  2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JAMES MABEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANN TERHUNE, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-12899 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K.

MAJZOUB

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [33]; DISMISSING 

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT TERHUNE; GRANTING DEFENDANT 

COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR AND DEFENDANT TOMLINSON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT [28]; GRANTING DEFENDANT VANDREW’S MOTION TO DISMISS [16];

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO DISMISS [22]; DENYING 

AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY [4]; DENYING AS MOOT 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION OBJECTING TO CLERK’S DENIAL OF DEFAULT [14]; AND 

CLOSING CASE

 On January 30, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation [33] concerning all pending matters. The Magistrate Judge 

recommended dismissal of all of Plaintiff’s claims. No party filed any objection to 

the Report and Recommendation. 

2:14-cv-12899-AJT-MKM Doc # 34 Filed 03/19/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 259
2 

 The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [33] and enters its 

conclusions and findings as those of the Court, with the following addition. On 

October 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed a “Motion Objecting to Order of Reference to 

Magistrate Judge” [17]. The Court is unaware of any authority authorizing such a 

motion. In any case, Plaintiff’s objection has no merit. Plaintiff argues that the 

Court should not have referred pretrial matters to the Magistrate Judge during the 

pendency of his Motion Objecting to Clerk’s Denial of Default [14], since the 

Magistrate Judge is not authorized to decide the motion under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(A). However, Plaintiff ignores § 636(b)(1)(B), which authorizes the 

Magistrate Judge to submit a report and recommendation on dispositive matters. 

The Magistrate Judge properly submitted a report and recommendation, which the 

Court now adopts. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Terhune are 

dismissed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief may be granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant County of St. Clair and 

Defendant Tomlinson’s Motion for Summary Judgment [28] is GRANTED. 

2:14-cv-12899-AJT-MKM Doc # 34 Filed 03/19/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 260
3 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant VanDrew’s Motion to 

Dismiss [16] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Motion to Dismiss 

[22] is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery [4] and 

Plaintiff’s Motion Objecting to Clerk’s Denial of Default [14] are DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

 Arthur J. Tarnow 

Dated: March 19, 2015 Senior United States District Judge 

2:14-cv-12899-AJT-MKM Doc # 34 Filed 03/19/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 261
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE JUNE 30, 1998
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001005698
<NAME>    SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC.
       
<S>                                   <C>                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1998                                        
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          354,225                             
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   111,051                                              
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0    
<INVENTORY>                                     130,603                                     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                595,879
<PP&E>                                          979,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  369,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,276,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,446,166
<BONDS>                                          77,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          8,362
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,255,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,276,853
<SALES>                                         873,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                873,476
<CGS>                                         1,216,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,139,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3,223,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (1,300)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              592,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,040,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,040,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,040,009)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (7.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (7.65)
                                                       

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DANIEL GROEN, UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL; 

Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

PRECISION STANDARD, INC., 

Defendant. 

2:14-CV-12724-TGB 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 

This case was filed in this district on July 11, 2014. On July 7, 

2021, pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 41.2, the Court ordered Plaintiff to 

show cause, in writing, why the case should not be dismissed for failure 

to prosecute. Plaintiff has not responded to that order. As part of its 

inherent authority to manage its docket, the Court has the power to 

dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash 

R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-32 (1962). 

Case 2:14-cv-12724-TGB-RSW ECF No. 43, PageID.239 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 2
 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-captioned case shall 

be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. 

DATED this 31st day of August, 2021. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-12724-TGB-RSW ECF No. 43, PageID.240 Filed 08/31/21 Page 2 of 2
FW: Pesticide work group IPMs 

MOORE Beth 

to: 

Jordan Page 

07/10/2009 02:24 PM 

Show Details 

Hi.  I don’t know if you have these so I am sending them again.

From: MOORE Beth 

Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:33 PM 

To: 'Faulk.Jack@epamail.epa.gov' 

Subject: Pesticide work group

  

  

I am still working on getting information on vector control..but these documents do have costs broken out some

of which include manual labor of the hand pulling of weeds that may be helpful in figuring out the cost of doing

that along ditches.  Other documents are more for other use patterns (in water) that can be used for future

discussion on those use patterns.

  

COSTS

  

For aquatic pesticide

applications in irrigations

systems, “Guide for

Developing Integrated

Aquatic Vegetation

Management Plans in

Oregon” (http://www.clr.pdx.edu/publications/files/iavmp.pdf)

and “Aquatic Vegetation

in Irrigation Canals A

Guide to Integrated

Management” publication  

(http://www.clr.pdx.edu/docs/int_weed_mgmt.pdf).  

  

Blue Lake in Multnomah

Co. ‐ 

http://www.clr.pdx.edu/docs/bl_plan.pdf;

  

Budget for Clackamas

County Vector Control

(gives an idea on

education versus

equipment costs)

http://www.vectorclackamas.com/budget.php

  

Cost of integrated

management plan for

invasive plant in estuary.

(digging, herbicide,

mowing costs)

http://www.clr.pdx.edu/docs/OSRP.pdf

  

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jpage01\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4017.... 5/12/2010
Hope this is helpful.

  

Beth Moore

General Permits Coordinator

DEQ WQ-Surface Water Management

Phone: (503) 229-6402

Fax: (503) 229-6037

  

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jpage01\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4017.... 5/12/2010
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                              OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mindset Interactive Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Minder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                                 By:/s/  Michael Minder
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                 Name:   Michael Minder
                                                 Title:  Chief Executive Officer


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mindset Interactive Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marion McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of the Company.

                                                 By:/s/  Marion McGrath
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                 Name:   Marion McGrath
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 84.87 Equivalent facilitation.

Nothing in this subpart prevents the use of designs, methods, or techniques as alternatives to those prescribed, provided that the alternative designs, methods, or techniques result in substantially equivalent or greater accessibility and usability of the web content or mobile app.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CSI Business Finance, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:    November 21, 2005                       By:    /s/  A. P.  Shukis
                                                        ------------------
                                                 Name:  A. P. Shukis
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906,  has been  provided to CSI Business
Finance,  Inc. and will be retained by CSI Business Finance,  Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 EXHIBIT 32.2-1
From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Erich Eschmann/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney,

We're trying to cross-walk the oil data with our small entity analysis to make sure we've adequately captured the appropriate units. We're hoping to complete that today. Hopefully we can send over the info either later today, or over the weekend.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/09/2011 01:17 PM Subject: EGU MACT -- cost of compliance for oil-fired units

Hi Bob, Do you know when we’ll see the cost of compliance for the oil fired units? In particular, we are interested in the costs for the units with CF between 5 and 10%.

Regards, Cortney
# C_2008035EN.01003101.xml

| 8.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/31

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council — Deadline extension

Request made by a Member State

(2008/C 35/12)

On 10 January 2008 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

This request, made by the Republic of Austria, concerns electricity production in that country. A notice concerning the request was published in OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 34. The initial deadline expires on 11 April 2008.

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), and since the Commission needs to obtain and examine additional information, the period within which the Commission must take a decision on this request has been extended by three months.

The final deadline is therefore 11 July 2008.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 400.313 Use of funds.

A State must use its targeted assistance funds primarily for employability services designed to enable refugees to obtain jobs with less than one year's participation in the targeted assistance program in order to achieve economic self-sufficiency as soon as possible. Targeted assistance services may continue to be provided after a refugee has entered a job to help the refugee retain employment or move to a better job. Targeted assistance funds may not be used for long-term training programs such as vocational training that last for more than a year or educational programs that are not intended to lead to employment within a year.
§ 83.12 Recruitment. ( a ) *Comparable recruitment.* A federally supported entity shall, with respect to each of its training programs, make comparable efforts to recruit members of each sex in the geographic area from which such entity attracts its students. A federally supported entity shall not recruit for any of its training programs exclusively or primarily at organizations or agencies which admit as members or students, or which provide a service for, only members of one sex unless such entity can demonstrate that such action is part of a recruitment program which does not have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in selection for a training program.
( b ) *Recruitment practices.* A federally supported entity shall: ( 1 ) Prominently include a statement of its policy of nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in each announcement, bulletin, catalogue, or application form which describes the training program of such entity or is used in connection with the recruitment of employees who will work directly with applicants for or students enrolled in a training program;
( 2 ) Distribute without discrimination on the basis of sex any announcements, bulletins, catalogues, or other materials used in connection with the recruitment of students for a training program or employees who will work directly with applicants for such program or such students; and
( 3 ) Apprise each of its recruitment representatives of its policy of nondiscrimination on the basis of sex, and require such representatives to adhere to such policy.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14595-14596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Research Support and Animal Care Services.
    Date: April 4, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20850.
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1439, lf33c.nih.gov.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


[[Page 14596]]


    Dated: March 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1505 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 11.540 Endorsements as engineers of mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs).

Endorsements as chief engineer (MODU) or assistant engineer (MODU) authorize service on certain self-propelled or non-self-propelled units of unlimited propulsion power where authorized by the vessel's certificate of inspection.