alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14594-14595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute, Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose

[[Page 14595]]

confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, National Eye Institute Clinical Trials.
    Date: April 9, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Tenleytown Meeting Room, Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Samuel Rawlings, PhD, Chief Scientific Review 
Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, 
301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b495a4c5752555c487b555e5215555253155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="760417011a1f1811053618131f58181f1e58111900">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1519 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mary Monahan, *Respondent, v.*The City of Cohoes, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bumsey, J.;

Osborn, J., not acting.
#### § 51.2 Application.

Materials covering procedures for applying for substantial disruption waivers (including the comprehensive plan) may be obtained from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.

The Department of State entered into an agreement with the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates in 1971 whereby the latter was designated the authority to administer the issuance of the Form IAP-66 in all cases involving the admission, certification, transfer or extension of stay for foreign physicians in exchange visitor status who are receiving graduate medical education or training. The Commission was further designated the authority (Federal Register, Volume 44, No. 59, March 26, 1979), to process waiver requests under the “substantial disruption” provision of Pub. L. 94-484, as amended, within criteria to be provided by the United States Information Agency on advice from the Department of Health and Human Services (formerly Department of Health, Education, and Welfare).

Federal Register,
Case 1:12-cv-01451-JEB-JRB-RLW Document 12 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                           Certification pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Michael R. Kallet, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Eric E. Stickels,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oneida Financial Corp.
(the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that
he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 and that to the best of his/her knowledge:

(6)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(7)   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


May 13, 2004                           /s/ Michael R. Kallet
Date                                   -----------------------------------------
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


May 13, 2004                           /s/ Eric E. Stickels
Date                                   -----------------------------------------
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[TEXT]
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
Financial Data Schedule
 "This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from December 31, 1997 10KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                             56,541
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      175,226
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        14,193,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             46,437
<DEPRECIATION>                     (1,016,660)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     13,454,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0
<BONDS>                            16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        1,212
<COMMON>                           47,034
<OTHER-SE>                         13,383,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       13,454,607
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   287,837
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      452,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (164,310)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (164,310)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (164,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0
§ 73.735-804 Waiver of the prohibitions in this subpart. ( a ) An employee may request approval to participate in his or her official capacity in a matter in which he or she has a direct or indirect financial interest if the employee believes the interest is so remote and inconsequential that it would not affect the integrity of his or her official duties. Also an employee who has a financial interest that would otherwise be prohibited under these regulations may request an exemption from the prohibition for the reason stated in the preceding sentence.
( b ) The request shall be in writing and shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Employee's name, occupational title, grade or rank and Federal salary;
( 2 ) Full description of financial interest: including whether ownership, service as officer, partner, etc.;
( 3 ) Business or activity in which financial interest exists;
( 4 ) Description of official matter in which employee is requesting approval to participate;
( 5 ) Basis for requesting determination that the interest is “not so substantial as to be deemed likely to affect the integrity of the services which the Government may expect.” (If based on a small total value of investment, supply appropriate information on total value, such as total shares held and latest quoted market price. If other basis, explain fully.)
The request should be sent through usual administrative channels to the official responsible for reviewing financial disclosure reports or statements for the employee's organization (Subpart I). That official, after conferring with a deputy ethics counselor or with the Department Ethics Counselor as appropriate, will make a decision about the exemption or exception and inform the employee in writing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO PEREZ SILVA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70900 

Agency No. A090-549-419 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Fernando Perez Silva, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for withholding of 

removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our 

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-70900 

and claims of due process violations, and review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 

2014). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Perez Silva’s contention that the IJ lacked jurisdiction over proceedings is 

foreclosed by Karingithi v. Whitaker, 913 F.3d 1158, 1160 (9th Cir. 2019).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Perez Silva’s conviction constitutes a particularly serious crime that bars 

withholding of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); Pechenkov v. Holder, 705 

F.3d 444, 448 (9th Cir. 2012) (no jurisdiction to review particularly serious crime 

determination where there is no assertion of legal or constitutional error and the 

only challenge is that the IJ incorrectly weighed the facts).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief where Perez 

Silva did not establish that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured in 

Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (speculative 

possibility of torture does not establish eligibility for CAT relief).

Perez Silva’s due process claim fails because he has not established 

prejudice from the alleged violation. See Padilla-Martinez, 770 F.3d at 830 

(requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### § 111.15-1 General.

Each battery must meet the requirements of this subpart.

[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28277, June 4, 1996]
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      |                                                                        |   |   |                                                  |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|  By: |                    */s/                  Edward J. Lawson*             |   |   |                                                       |
|      | **Edward                J. Lawson, Chief Executive                Officer** |   |   | **August                  09,                  2007** |
|      |                                                                             |   |   |                                                       |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6686

JACK RANDALL CRABTREE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:16-cv-00169-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Randall Crabtree, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jack Randall Crabtree seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition because he 

failed to exhaust his state remedies. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Crabtree has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2008203EN.01001401.xml

| 9.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/14

---

Corrigendum to Special Report No 4/2008 concerning the implementation of milk quotas in the Member States which joined the European Union on 1 May 2004

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 185 of 22 July 2008
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 185 of 22 July 2008

(2008/C 203/09)

On page 7, paragraph 10:

for:

‘Due to the small number of farms ...’,

read:

‘Due to the number of small farms ...’.

---
§ 79.26 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Documents filed with the ALJ shall include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (*e.g.,* motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone number of, the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than those required to be served as prescribed in § 79.8 shall be made by delivering a copy or by placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by a representative, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                 WALTER FEY, CPA
                             366 Mass Ave, Suite 303
                               Arlington, MA 02474
                               TEL (781) 641-9889
                               FAX (781) 641-9889
                              Email: wfcpa@aol.com





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110696, 333-100971 and 333-11650)
of B.O.S Better Online Solutions Ltd. ("BOS") of my report Dated January 16,
2004, with respect to the financial statements of Surf Communications Solutions
Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December
31, 2003.




Arlington, MA
February 28, 2005

                                                             /S/ Walter Fey, CPA

                                                               Walter Fey, CPA
§ 83.1 Purposes. ( a ) The purposes of this part are ( 1 ) to effectuate the provisions of sections 799A and 845 of the Public Health Service Act, which forbid the extension of Federal support under title VII or VIII of that Act to any entity of the types described in those sections unless that entity submits to the Secretary of Health and Human Services an assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that it will not discriminate on the basis of sex in the admission of individuals to its training programs, and
( 2 ) to implement the policy of the Secretary that no Federal support will be extended under those titles to any other entity unless that entity submits to the Secretary an assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that it will not discriminate on the basis of sex in the admission of individuals to its training programs.
( b ) The objective of this part is to abolish use of sex as a criterion in the admission of individuals to all training programs operated by an entity which receives support under title VII or VIII of the Act, and thereby to foster maximum use of all available human resources in meeting the Nation's needs for qualified health personnel.
§ 92.202 Effective communication for individuals with disabilities. ( a ) A covered entity must take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with individuals with disabilities (including companions with disabilities), are as effective as communications with non-disabled individuals in its health programs and activities, in accordance with the standards found at 28 CFR 35.130 and 35.160 through 35.164. Where the regulatory provisions referenced in this section use the term “public entity,” the term “covered entity” shall apply in its place.
( b ) A covered entity must provide appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, the health program or activity in question. Such auxiliary aids and services must be provided free of charge, in accessible formats, in a timely manner, and in such a way to protect the privacy and the independence of the individual with a disability.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0977 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM190AD

MOM - MOM - 13 - 0375 - 01B --- 5/9/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
                                                
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,761
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         171
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    101,209
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        131,700
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,076
<DEPOSITS>                                     187,488
<SHORT-TERM>                                   5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            257
<LONG-TERM>                                    15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       358
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 251,076
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,763
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,477
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               125
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,365
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,017
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,349
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                994
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     605
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                    818
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2,786
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,543
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  66
<RECOVERIES>                                   46
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,568
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,297
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        271
        


</TABLE>
- 2136
- 2137
#### §§ 605.48-605.50 [Reserved]