alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

# Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd., a
company organized under the laws of the State of Israel (the Company),
for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge, that:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as                of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ Shmuel Koren  
Shmuel KorenPresident and Chief Executive Officer | By: /s/ Eyal Cohen
Eyal CohenChief Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 30, 2008



---

---
#### § 12.903 Definitions.

*Passenger ship* in this subpart means a ship carrying more than 12 passengers when on an international voyage.
#### The Gould Manufacturing Company, *Respondent, v.*R. De Witt Mason, *Appellan*t.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dominic Ng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:           August 6, 2010








/s/ DOMINIC NG


Dominic Ng


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. CASE NO. 14-cr-20506 

 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

ERIC D. BURTON 

 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN LIMINE [#27] AND 

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE [#28] AND GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S ORAL MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT THE ENTIRE DISPATCH 

RECORDING

On February 17, 2015, the Government made an oral motion to exclude evidence of 

search warrants for a home neighboring the scene of the crime. Later the same day, the 

Government filed a Motion in Limine. Doc. No. 27. The Government sought to exclude, in 

particular, evidence of search warrants and the execution of search warrants issued on June 16, 

2014, and August 24, 2014. Id. The Government also sought to exclude the admission of 

climatological data printouts for the day that Defendant’s arrest occurred. Id. On February 18, 

2015, Defendant filed a formal Motion in Limine to Allow Defendant to Present His Theory of 

Defense. Doc. No. 28 (moving for the inclusion of the search warrants). 

In addition, on February 18, 2015, the Government made an oral motion objecting to the 

admission of the entirety of the dispatch recording of Detroit Police Officer John McKee and 

Officer Michael Manzella. While the parties have stipulated to the recording’s entry into 

2:14-cr-20506-GAD-MKM Doc # 34 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 156
2 

evidence, see Doc. No. 29, the parties disagreed as to whether the entire 11-minute recording 

should be played before the jury. 

For the reasons stated on the record, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the following: 

The Government’s Motion in Limine to exclude search warrants and the execution of 

search warrants and to exclude a climatological data printout [#27] is GRANTED. 

Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Allow Defendant to Present His Theory of Defense 

[#28] is DENIED. 

Defendant’s oral Motion in Limine to include the entirety of the dispatch recording of 

Officers McKee and Manzella is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Dated: February 19, 2015

2:14-cr-20506-GAD-MKM Doc # 34 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 157
###### Editorial Note on Part 85

#### Editorial Note:

At the request of the Department of Health and Human Services, the “Section-by-Section Analysis” portion of the preamble of the document published at 53 FR 25595, July 8, 1988, as corrected at 53 FR 26559, July 13, 1988, appears at the end of part 85.

#### § 85.43 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, or on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157) as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607 apply to buildings covered by this section.
# CE2009294EN.01012601.xml

| 3.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 294/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 294/126

---

Wednesday 9 July 2008Restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations ***I

P6_TA(2008)0345

European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 July 2008 on the proposal for a decision of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol,2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol, methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, cyclohexane and ammonium nitrate (COM(2007)0559 — C6-0327/2007 — 2007/0200(COD))

2009/C 294 E/46

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0559),

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0327/2007),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0135/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Wednesday 9 July 2008P6_TC1-COD(2007)0200

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 9 July 2008 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol, methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, cyclohexane and ammonium nitrate

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 1348/2008/EC.)

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1747 

To authorize appropriations for the design, acquisition, and construction of 

a combined buoy tender-icebreaker to replace icebreaking capacity on 

the Great Lakes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Mr. OBERSTAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the design, acquisition, and 

construction of a combined buoy tender-icebreaker to 

replace icebreaking capacity on the Great Lakes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Ice5 breaker Replacement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) five of the Coast Guard’s Great Lakes ice9 breakers are nearing the end of their useful lives; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1747 IH

1 (2) two other Coast Guard icebreaking assets 

2 have experienced difficulty in heavy ice conditions; 

3 (3) during the spring of 2008, United States4 flag vessels operating on the Great Lakes suffered 

5 more than $1,300,000 in damages to their hulls be6 cause the Coast Guard did not have enough assets 

7 available to keep Great Lakes shipping lanes open; 

8 (4) during the 2006–2007 ice season, ship9 ments of iron ore, coal, and limestone on the Great 

10 Lakes exceeded 20,000,000 tons; 

11 (5) during the 2006–2007 ice season, the trans12 portation of 10,400,000 tons of iron ore on the 

13 Great Lakes helped support 100,000 jobs at steel 

14 mills and 300,000 jobs at supplier industries by 

15 keeping those industries working during the winter 

16 season; and 

17 (6) the 6,400,000 tons of coal shipped on the 

18 Great Lakes during the 2006–2007 ice season kept 

19 the Great Lakes region supplied with electricity. 

20 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

21 There is authorized to be appropriated $153,000,000 

22 for necessary expenses of the Coast Guard for the design, 

23 acquisition, and construction of a combined buoy tenderVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:45 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1747.IH H1747

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1747 IH

1 icebreaker to replace icebreaking capacity on the Great 

2 Lakes, to remain available until expended. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 12.619 Requirements to qualify for an STCW endorsement as medical first-aid provider. ( a ) To qualify for an STCW endorsement as medical first-aid provider, an applicant must— ( 1 ) Provide evidence of successful completion of an approved course in medical first aid; and
( 2 ) Provide evidence of meeting the standard of competence specified in Table A-VI/4-1 of the STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see § 12.103 of this part).
( b ) An applicant holding one of the following credentials is qualified for an endorsement as medical first-aid provider: ( 1 ) A valid professional license listed in § 11.807(a)(5) or (a)(6) of this subchapter, without restriction or limitation placed upon it by the issuing State.
( 2 ) A rating listed in § 11.807(a)(7) or (a)(8) of this subchapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 107.260 Rated load test for cranes.

(a) To meet the requirements in § 107.231(l), each crane must meet the following rated load test at both the maximum and minimum boom angles usually employed in material transfers over the side of the unit:

| Rated load of assembled gear | Proof load |
| --- | --- |
| Less than or equal to 20 tons | 25 pct in excess. |
| Greater than 20 tons but less than or equal to 50 tons | 5 tons in excess. |
| Greater than 50 tons | 10 pct in excess. |

(b) The weight of the hook, hook blocks, slings, rib, and other rigging, except the hoist rope, must be considered part of the load for the rated load test.

(c) The rated load test must be performed—

(1) When the crane is installed;

(2) Each 60 months; and

(3) After repairs or alterations to any structural component of the crane.

[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53226, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6504, Feb. 9, 2000]
#### § 121.702 Pollution prevention equipment and procedures.

A vessel must comply with the applicable design, equipment, personnel, procedures, and record requirements of 33 CFR parts 151, 155, and 156.
#### § 510.2 Time for filing.

Claims for payments under the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act, Title XVII, Public Law 114-328 (the “Act”), must be filed not later than one year after the date on which the Commission publishes the notice described in section 1705(b)(2)(B) of the Act.
Exhibit 33.2


                     REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
                Section 1122(d)(2)(vi) and Section 1122(d)(4)(xi)
                       of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.,
collectively the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December
31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in
Section ll22(d)(2)(vi), Section 1122(d)(4)(xi) and Section 1122(d)(4)(xii) of
Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which the
Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing
activities it performs with respect to all mortgage loan-tracking transactions
covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all
mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a
Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that
were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"). The scope of
the Asserting Party assertions excludes Section 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which relates to
servicing activities that are performed by the Asserting Party with respect to
the Platform, but are not reported on herein.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vi) and
Section 1122(d)(4)(xi) ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria") for the Reporting
Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with
respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The Asserting Party used the criteria
set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period ending December
31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

American Security Insurance Company
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.


/s/ John Frobose
-------------------------------------
By: John Frobose
    Senior Vice President

Date: February 23, 2007
§ 689.7 Pending proposals and awards. ( a ) Upon learning of alleged research misconduct OIG will identify potentially implicated awards or proposals and when appropriate, will ensure that program, grant, and contracting officers handling them are informed (subject to § 689.6(c)).
( b ) Neither a suspicion or allegation of research misconduct nor a pending inquiry or investigation will normally delay review of proposals. To avoid influencing reviews, reviewers or panelists will not be informed of allegations or of ongoing inquiries or investigations. However, if allegations, inquiries, or investigations have been rumored or publicized, the responsible Program Director may consult with OIG and, after further consultation with the Office of General Counsel, either defer review, inform reviewers to disregard the matter, or inform reviewers of the status of the matter.
v055340_ex10-11 Page

 

 









 

v055340_ex10-12 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-13 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-14 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-15 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-16 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-17 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-18 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-19 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-110 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-111 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-112 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-113 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-114 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-115 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-116 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-117 Page

 









 

v055340_ex10-118 Page

 









---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United

1

States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Although Stout has served her prison sentence, this appeal is 2

not moot because she is still serving her term of supervised

release. See United States v. Chavez-Palacios, 30 F.3d 1290, 1293

(10th Cir. 1994); McClain v. Bureau of Prisons, 9 F.3d 503, 505

(6th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); United States v. Smith, 991 F.2d

1468, 1470 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Huang, 977 F.2d 540,

542 n.1 (11th Cir. 1992) (per curiam).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-2795

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska

Kathy J. Stout, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 7, 1997

 Filed: March 20, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kathy J. Stout, a Native American, appeals her three-month sentence

imposed by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska 1

after she pleaded guilty to theft of federal funds, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A). Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For the reasons discussed below, we

affirm.2
-2-

Stout argues that the district court impermissibly considered race

as a factor in her sentence, as evidenced by its statement that

imprisonment was required "for other people at the reservation and

throughout the state of Nebraska to know that when you steal $27,000 of the

federal government's money, you're going to jail for it for a while."

In support of her appeal, Stout relies on United States v. Onwuemene,

933 F.2d 650, 651-52 (8th Cir. 1991) (reference to alien status constituted

incorrect application of guidelines and violation of due process). We find

Onwuemene distinguishable. Here, the district court did not specifically

address Stout's race or her particular status as a Native American; rather,

the court discussed in general terms the need to impose imprisonment as a

deterrent to show people both in the reservation and throughout Nebraska

that stealing government property has severe consequences. Thus, we

conclude that, taking the district court's comments in context, the court

did not impermissibly consider Stout's Native American status in imposing

the three-month sentence. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no other nonfrivolous

issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Conference Grants (R13).
    Date: April 6, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Valerie L. Prenger, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7214, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924. 
301-435-0270. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b0b091e151c1e090d3b151317191255151213551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2c2c0d7dcd5d7c0c4f2dcdaded0db9cdcdbda9cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Ancillary Studies in Clinical Trials.
    Date: April 11, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Yingying Li-Smerin, MD, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7184, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924. 
301-435-0277. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4d8ddc7d9d1c6dddaf4dadcd8d6dd9adadddc9ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dfb3b6acb2baadb6b19fb1b7b3bdb6f1b1b6b7f1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 6, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1184 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>