alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted July 21, 1995,

affirmed April 17, 1996

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PAUL DARREN MONROE, *Appellant.*

(9407-1423M; CA A85893)

915 P2d 430

Eric M. Cumfer, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Belzons,*140 Or App 198, 915 P2d 428 (1996).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,336
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,778
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,861
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,287
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            32,445
<LOANS>                                        172,852
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,944
<DEPOSITS>                                     192,033
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,123
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 233,944
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,093
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,792
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   287
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,172
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,771
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,401
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      110
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,620
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,620
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.05
<LOANS-NON>                                        644
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   383
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,983
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,192
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,192
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,192
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 170 appear at 80 FR 62755, Oct. 16, 2015.

#### § 170.511 Authorization scope for ONC-ATL status.

Applicants may seek authorization from the National Coordinator to perform the testing of Complete EHRs or Health IT Modules to a portion of a certification criterion, one certification criterion, or many or all certification criteria adopted by the Secretary under subpart C of this part.

[81 FR 72464, Oct. 19, 2016]
#### § 86.39 Health and insurance benefits and services.

In providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner which would violate Subpart E of this part if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service which may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient which provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.

(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)
#### § 630.110 Are any of my Federal assistance awards exempt from this part?

This part does not apply to any award that the Director or designee determines that the application of this part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the laws or regulations of a foreign government.
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-00053-RWR Document 1 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 12 of 12
#### § 506.15 Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949.

The Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949, as identified in section 6(f) of the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended, is the “Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12, 1949” which is included under the “Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949, for the Protection of War Victims,” entered into by the United States and other governments, including the former government in North Vietnam which acceded to it on June 28, 1957.
#### David P. Canavan et al., Respondents, *v.*Decauville Auto mobile Company, Appellant.

*Oanamn*v. *Decaumlie Automobile Co.,*124 App. Div. 933, affirmed.

(Argued October 11, 3909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 26, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying .a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon ■ certain contracts.

*Francis Fitch, Frederick 8. Randall*and *Samuel 8. Slater*for appellant.

*L. Lajtin Kellogg*and *Franklin. Kevins*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
#### Mary A. Guilfoyle, Appellant, *v.*Catherine E. Pierce et al., Respondents.

*Guilfoyle*v. *Pierce,*125 App. Div. 504, affirmed.

(Submitted June 8, 1909;

decided October 5, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the A ppellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 10, 1908, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term *500and granting a new trial in an action to set aside a deed on the ground of fraud.

*Nranldin Bien*for appellant.

*John M. Gardner*for respondents.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, J.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 AM

To: 'apurwin@helinet.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Ro b (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA) Subject: Alan Purwin



### Dear Mr. Purwin:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0786). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headqua rters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include the following: size and maximum wei ght (include payload) and whethe r the aircraft is fixed wing or

rotorcraft.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency sp ectrum. This information can be located in the

aircraft manual.

 Describe the proximity of the pr oposed operations to airports.

 Your petition references an flight operations and procedures manual, however it was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the manual.

Please provide the additional information by December 22, 2014.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### § 96.32 Financial settlement.

The State must repay to the Department amounts found after audit resolution to have been expended improperly. In the event that repayment is not made voluntarily, the Department will undertake recovery.

[52 FR 37966, Oct. 13, 1987]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 3-07] 

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as follows: 

# Date and Time:

Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 1 p.m. 

# Subject Matter:

Issuance of Proposed Decisions, Amended Proposed Decisions, and Amended Final Decisions in claims against Albania. 

# Status:

Open. 

                        All meetings are held at the Foreign claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement                               ( print page 12636)                            Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6988.                     

Mauricio J. Tamargo, 

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 07-1325 Filed 3-14-07; 3:32 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
#### § 1607.1 Purpose.

This part is designed to insure that the governing body of a recipient will be well qualified to guide a recipient in its efforts to provide high-quality legal assistance to those who otherwise would be unable to obtain adequate legal counsel and to insure that the recipient is accountable to its clients.
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.265 Special examination in lieu of drydocking for column stabilized units or surface type units when specifically approved by the Commandant. ( a ) A column stabilized unit, or surface type unit when approved by the Commandant, must be specially examined in accordance with a plan— ( 1 ) Submitted in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 2 ) Accepted by the Commandant (CG-CVC).
( b ) To meet the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, the owner or operator of the unit must submit a plan to the Coast Guard that provides the methods used to determine the condition of the hull and that contains the following information: ( 1 ) The planned location where the unit is to be examined.
( 2 ) The draft at which the unit is to be examined.
( 3 ) The names of the diver or diving company selected for the examination.
( 4 ) The method of visual presentation for the examination.
( 5 ) The method used to clean the underwater portion of the hull.
( 6 ) The method and location of gauging the underwater portion of the hull.
( 7 ) The number of underwater hull fittings and number of compartments to be opened.
( 8 ) The underwater high stress areas and the welds in those areas to be examined.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50464, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50730, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49233, Sept. 25, 2009]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76670-76671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Biosurveillance 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 13th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Biosurveillance Workgroup in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: January 5, 2007 from 12 to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/bio_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue discussing the 
Biosurveillance Priority Area matrix.
    The meeting will be available via internet access. For additional 
information, go to http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/bio_instruct.html.


[[Page 76671]]


    Dated: December 14, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the national Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-9804 Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
- 2901
- 2902
- 2903
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s Report and 

Recommendation. (Dkt. 19.) At the conclusion of her Report and Recommendation, Magistrate 

Judge Stafford notified the parties that they were required to file any objections within fourteen 

days of service, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and Eastern District of 

Michigan Local Rule 72.1(d), and that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of 

any further right of appeal.” (Report & Recommendation at 19.) No objections were filed. 

In United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981), the Sixth Circuit 

established a rule of procedural default, holding that “a party shall file objections with the district 

court or else waive right to appeal.” In Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 144 (1985), the Supreme 

Court held that this rule violates neither the Federal Magistrates Act nor the federal constitution. 

Pursuant to Walters and Thomas, Campanaro’s “failure to object is a procedural default, waiving 

his right for this Court to review the report and recommendation.” Johnson v. Clafton, No. 13-

CV-14922-LJM, 2015 WL 4770105, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2015). 

MELISSA CAMPANARO, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 14-cv-12876 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [19], GRANTING IN 

PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT [14], DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT [17], AND REMANDING THE CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 

2:14-cv-12876-LJM-EAS Doc # 20 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 620
2 

The Court therefore finds that Campanaro has waived further review of the Report and 

accepts the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. It follows that the Court GRANTS IN 

PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 14) and DENIES 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 17). A separate judgment will follow. 

 SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Dated: August 24, 2015 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys 

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on August 24, 2015. 

 s/Jane Johnson 

Case Manager to 

 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

2:14-cv-12876-LJM-EAS Doc # 20 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 621
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 18 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 18

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine and 
                        crack cocaine offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mr. Bartlett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine and 
                        crack cocaine offenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Powder-Crack Cocaine Penalty 
Equalization Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. TRAFFICKING.

    (a) 50-Gram Penalty.--Section 401(b)(1)(A) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``5 kilograms'' and 
        inserting ``50 grams''; and
            (2) by striking clause (iii).
    (b) 5-Gram Penalty.--Section 401(b)(1)(B) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``500 grams'' and inserting 
        ``5 grams''; and
            (2) by striking clause (iii).

SEC. 3. POSSESSION.

    Section 404(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 844(a)) 
is amended by striking ``cocaine base'' and inserting ``any controlled 
substance described in section 401(b)(1)(A)(ii)''.

SEC. 4. IMPORT AND EXPORT.

    (a) 50-Gram Penalty.--Section 1010(b)(1) of the Controlled 
Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``5 kilograms'' and 
        inserting ``50 grams''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C).
    (b) 5-Gram Penalty.--Section 1010(b)(2) of the Controlled 
Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``500 grams'' and 
        inserting ``5 grams''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
§ 2105.20 How will the Agency grant requests? ( a ) Once the Agency makes a determination to grant a request in full or in part, it must notify you in writing.
( b ) The notification will inform you of the availability of its FOIA Public Liaison to offer assistance, and of any fees charged under subpart G of this part.
( c ) The Agency will release records (or portions of records) to you promptly upon payment of any applicable fees (or before then, at its discretion).
( d ) If the records (or portions of records) are not included with the Agency's notification, the Agency will advise you how, when, and where the records will be released or made available.
###### Editorial Note on Part 303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 303 appear at 64 FR 6249, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 303.1 Definitions.

The definitions found in § 301.1 of this chapter also are applicable to this part.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, (the “Report”), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Neil K. Warma,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      August 13, 2008
            By: /s/ Neil K.
      WarmaNeil
      K. WarmaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 USC. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form10-K of Information Services Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the yearended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank Martell, Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(3)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(4)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| March 30, 2007 |   | /s/ FRANK  MARTELL                          |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Frank Martell                               |
|                |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial   |
|                |   | Officer and  Treasurer (Principal Financial |
|                |   | Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer)  |

 

----