alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 116.340 Alternate design considerations.

The Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, may approve the structure of a vessel of novel design, unusual form, or special materials, which does not meet the requirements of § 116.300, if it is shown by systematic analysis based on engineering principles that the vessel structure provides adequate safety and strength. An owner seeking approval of an alternate design shall submit detailed plans, material component specifications, and design criteria, including the expected operating environment, resulting loads on the vessel, and design limitations for such a vessel, to the Marine Safety Center.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-173-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
NO. 07-10-0489-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JULY 15, 2011

___________________________

CARLOS LAMONT FISHER, JR.,  

	Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,  

	Appellee

___________________________

FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;

NO. 7369; HONORABLE LEE WATERS, PRESIDING

___________________________

Abatement and Remand

___________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	On July 6, 2011, we granted the State’s agreed Motion to Correct the Reporter’s Record and ordered the court reporter to file a supplemental record making the changes approved.  However, the court reporter notified this court that he could not certify the record with the agreed change since the event did not occur at trial and was not part of the trial record.  

	The change requested by the State and agreed to by appellant concerns defendant’s trial exhibit one, which is several forms filed under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA).  However, according to the State’s motion, not all of the pages were attached to the forms that were admitted at trial. 

 Accordingly, we abate this cause back to the trial court.  Upon remand, it is directed to determine whether the exhibits tendered by the parties and accepted into evidence at trial are the ones actually included in the record developed by the court reporter.  Should it determine that the exhibits of record accurately reflect those the parties intended to proffer and it intended to receive, then the trial court shall so inform this court via pertinent findings.  Should it determine that the exhibits received and included in the reporter’s record differ from those the parties tendered and it intended to accept, then the trial court shall specify, via pertinent findings, which exhibits they may be and attach an accurate copy of them to its findings.  The latter must then be included in a supplemental record, which record must then be filed with the clerk of this court on or before August 15, 2011.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before August 15, 2011.

It is so ordered.	

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A12-04 

Audit Division Recommendation ) Agenda Document No. 1S-06-A 

Memorandum on the Democratic Party of ) 

Wisconsin (DPW) ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on February 12,2015 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions 

in the above-captioned matter: 

1. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Approve the recoimnendation for Finding 1 (Misstatement of Financial Activity) as 

set forth in Agenda Document No. 15-06-A. 

Conunissioners Goodman, Himter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

2. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to: 

Approve the recommendation for Finding 2 (Recordkeeping) as set forth in Agenda 

Document No. 15-06-A, subject to an amen^ent to include the $323,279 paid to 

contract workers. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Goodman, Himter, and Petersen dissented. 
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification For Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Democratic Party of Wisconsin (DPW) 

February 12,2015 

3. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

a. Approve the recommendation for Finding 2 (Recordkeeping), as 

set forth in Agenda Document No. 15-06-A, related to the $2,192,554 

that the coimnittee disclosed as having been paid with an allocation 

of federal and nonfederal funds and $28,972 that was paid from an 

exclusively non-federal account during periods in which the employee 

was also paid with federal funds. 

b. Direct the Audit Division to include in the Proposed Final Audit Report 

an Additional Issues section addressing the $1,405,736 for 100% 

non-federal payments. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Cohunission
SERVED: MARCH 11, 2013 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

TGIFREIGHT ., 

FAA Docket No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-1079 

,, 

ORDER SETTING OUT BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

The parties have agreed on the following Post Hearing {3riefing Schedule, which is hereby 

established: · 

1. The Post-Hearing Brief of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration shall be filed on or 

before April1, 2013. 

2. The Post-Hearing Brief of Respondent TGI Freight shall be filed on or before May 6, 2013. 

3. The Rebuttal Brief of the Federal Aviation Adtpinistration, if any, shall be filed on or before 

May 24, 2013. : 

l·t!.alJ c ~c~ ~-. Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-'-Suite 2W10001 

Rebecca J. Hozubin, Respondent's Counsel 

Wilkerson Hozubin 

310 K Street, Suite 405 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-276-5297 

FAX: 907-276-5291 

ONE COPY 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7th Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office ofHearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.(Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Staff Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FAA Docket No. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Natural Nutrition, Inc.,
      formerly CSI Business Finance, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities
      and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to his knowledge:




1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:September 7, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Timothy
                J ConnollyName:
            Timothy
                J ConnollyTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-140]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5125-N-03]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 19, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been detemined 
suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: January 11, 2007.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 07-140 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
#### Moore, et al. v. Williams, Marshal.

(Decided October 29, 1918 )

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

1. Officers—Public Officers—Receipt of Illegal Appropriation—Character of Liability.—A public officer, who receives money illegally *817appropriated by a city council oí a municipality, becomes a mere debtor oí the municipality.

2. Mandamus—Nature and Ground—Collection of Debt.—Mandamus will not lie to collect a mere debt.

3. Appeal and Error—Amount in Controversy—Mandamus—Effect on Jurisdiction.—Where the amount in controversy is not sufficient to give jurisdiction, jurisdiction cannot be conferred by asking for a mandamus, when it is clear that mandamus will not lie and the sole purpose of asking it is to make the case appeal-able.

R. L. POPE and H. L. BRYANT for appellants.

H. C. GILLIS for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Dismissing the appeal.

W. L. Moore and others, citizens and taxpayers of the city of Williamsburg, brought this suit against J. A. Williams, as marshal of said city, for the purpose of obtaining a mandamus to compel him to restore to the city the sum of $100.00, alleged to have been illegally appropriated and paid to him by the city council. A demurrer was sustained to the petition and the petition dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal.

The petition charges in substance that Williams, while acting as marshal, was sued by one Talmage Burnett for personal injuries inflicted by Williams; that although the city was not a party to the proceeding, it subsequently appropriated and paid to the defendant the sum of $100.00 for expenses incurred in making his defense, and that said payment was unauthorized, illegal and void. It was further alleged that the defendant was insolvent and a mandamus was asked compelling him to pay back the money thus illegally collected.

This is not a suit to require the defendant to pay tp the city fees, which he collected by virtue of his office, and which the law required him to pay over to the city. The money which he received was appropriated and paid to him by the city council. If it be true that the appropriation was illegal, the law merely implied an obligation to repay the money, and he thereby became the mere debt- or of the city. In its final analysis, therefore, the suit is nothing more nor less than a proceeding to collect a mere debt of $100.00 by mandamus. Mandamus will not lie for that purpose. Montenegro-Riehm Music Co. v. Board of *818Education of Louisville, 147 Ky. 720, 145 S. W. 741. The amount is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. That being true, jurisdiction cannot be conferred by asking for a mandamus when it is clear that mandamus will not lie, and the sole purpose of asking it was to make the case appealable. It therefore follows that the appeal cannot be entertained.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 4.5 Effect of regulations.

The regulations in this part are intended solely to identify Department officials who are authorized to accept service of process. Litigants must comply with all requirements pertaining to service of process that are established by statute and court rule even though they are not repeated in these regulations.
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 2
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 3
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 4
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 5
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 6
2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 7
§ 1356.81 Reporting population. The reporting population is comprised of all youth in the following categories: ( a ) *Served population.* Each youth who receives an independent living service paid for or provided by the State agency during the reporting period.
( b ) *Baseline population.* Each youth who is in foster care as defined in 45 CFR 1355.20 and reaches his or her 17th birthday during Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2011, and such youth who reach a 17th birthday during every third year thereafter.
( c ) *Follow-up population.* Each youth who reaches his or her 19th or 21st birthday in a Federal fiscal year and had participated in data collection as part of the baseline population, as specified in section 1356.82(a)(2) of this part. A youth has participated in the outcomes data collection if the State agency reports to ACF a valid response (*i.e.*, a response option other than “declined” and “not applicable”) to any of the outcomes-related elements described in section 1356.83(g)(37) through (g)(58) of this part.
[73 FR 10365, Feb. 26, 2008]
# C_2008110EN.01002901.xml

| 1.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/29

---

Planned closure of complaint 2005/4347

(2008/C 110/13)

The Commission services have completed their investigation of mass complaint case 2005/4347 regarding water management in the Lake Idro area with reference to an important site under Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.

Following examination of the documentation submitted by the complainants and by the Italian authorities in the framework of the infringement procedure initiated by the Commission on 18 December 2005 (first letter of formal notice) and continued on 18 October 2006 (supplementary letter of formal notice), the Commission services have concluded that it is not possible, at this stage, to identify an infringement of Directive 92/43/EEC in the case in question. Consequently, the Commission services will propose to the Commission that the corresponding complaint case be closed.

Further details on the results of the examination may be found at the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/multiple_complaints/

Should the complainants have new information about possible infringements of Community rules, this should be submitted to the Commission within a month of the publication of this notice.

This does not preclude the case being reopened and proceedings being re-initiated, should the Commission come into possession — even after closure — of new facts that could justify opening such a new procedure regarding the same issue.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA).

# ACTION:

 Open Meeting Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of title 5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education (ACDE) is scheduled to be held on May 4, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting will be held at the InterContinental Hotel Frankfurt, Wilhelm-Leuschner Strasse 43, Frankfurt, Germany 60329. The purpose of the ACDE is to recommend to the Director, DoDEA, general policies for the operation of the Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS); to provide the Director with information about effective educational programs and practices that should be considered by DoDDS; and to perform other tasks as may be required by the Secretary of Defense. The meeting emphases will be the current operational qualities of schools and the institutionalized school improvement processes, as well as other educational matters. For further information contact Mr. Jim Jarrard at 703-588-3121, or at                         *James.Jarrard@hq.dodea.edu.*

Dated: March 20, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-1494 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1971 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1971

 To provide for the elimination of duties on certain comforter shells.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the elimination of duties on certain comforter shells.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DUTIES ON CERTAIN COMFORTER SHELLS.

    (a) In General.--Section 503(b)(4) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 
U.S.C. 2463(b)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by amending the heading to read as follows: ``Certain 
        Household Textile Articles.--'';
            (2) by striking ``Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A)'' and 
        inserting the following:
                    ``(A) Certain hand-knotted or hand-woven carpets.--
                Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Certain comforter shells.--Notwithstanding 
                paragraph (1)(A), the President may designate as an 
                eligible article or articles under subsection (a) 
                comforter shells of chief weight cotton that are 
                classifiable under subheading 6307.90.89 of the 
                Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```