alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard Daddario, Chief Financial Officer of The MONY Group
Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY Group Inc.



/s/ Richard Daddario

---

Richard Daddario

May 15, 2003



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The MONY Group Inc. and will be retained by The MONY Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

GLENDA J. BARR,

Plaintiff,

v.

Case No. 14-13477

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court’s “Opinion and Order (1) Overruling Plaintiff’s

Objections; (2) Adopting the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation; (3)

Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) Denying Plaintiff’s Motion

for Summary Judgment,” dated September 29, 2015, 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of

Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Glenda Barr. 

 Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 29th day of September 2015. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 29, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, September 29, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\14-13466.BARR.judgment.socialsecurityMSJ.smq.wpd

2:14-cv-13477-RHC-DRG Doc # 24 Filed 09/29/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 673
§ 11.450 Tonnage limitations and qualifying requirements for endorsements as master or mate of Great Lakes and inland vessels of less than 200 GRT. ( a ) Except as noted in paragraph (d) of this section, all endorsements issued for master or mate of vessels of less than 200 GRT are issued in 50 GRT increments based on the applicant's qualifying experience in accordance with the provisions of § 11.422 of this subpart.
( b ) Service gained in the engineroom on vessels of less than 200 GRT may be creditable for up to 25 percent of the deck service requirements for mate.
( c ) When the service is obtained on vessels upon which personnel with licenses or endorsements are not required, the Coast Guard must be satisfied that the nature of this required service (i.e., size of vessel, route, equipment, etc.) is a reasonable equivalent to the duties performed on vessels which are required to engage individuals with endorsements.
( d ) If more than 75 percent of the qualifying experience is obtained on vessels of 5 GRT or less, the license will automatically be limited to vessels of less than 25 GRT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

)

ABDUL KARIM HASSAN, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 11-2189 (EGS) 

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

ORDER

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on February

27, 2012. Because a ruling on defendant’s motion potentially

could dispose of this case, the Court hereby advises the pro se

plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and the rules of this Court. See Fox v. Strickland, 837

F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1988); Neal v. Kelly, 963 F.2d 453, 456 (D.C.

Cir. 1992).

The plaintiff is advised that the Court will rule on the

defendant’s motion taking into consideration the facts proffered

in the complaint, along with the plaintiff’s response or

opposition to the motion. The plaintiff’s attention is directed

to Local Civil Rule 7(b), which states:

Within . . . such . . . time as the Court may direct, an

opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of

points and authorities in opposition to the motion. If

such a memorandum is not filed within the prescribed

time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.

Local Civil Rule 7(b). Additionally, the plaintiff is directed to

Case 1:11-cv-02189-EGS Document 11 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 2
Rule 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which provides:

When a party may or must act within a specified time

after service and service is made [by mail or by other

means consented to in writing by the person served], 3

days are added after the period would otherwise expire .

. . .

Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). The Court may treat as conceded any motion

not opposed within the time limits outlined above. Alternatively,

the Court may consider on the merits any motion not opposed within

the time limits outlined above. Thus, failure to respond to the

defendant’s motion in this case carries with it the risk that the

case will be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that, on or before March 23, 2012, the plaintiff

shall file his opposition or other response to the motion filed on

behalf of the defendant. If the plaintiff fails to respond

timely, the Court may grant the motion as conceded, and may

dismiss the complaint.

SO ORDERED.

Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan

United States District Judge

March 2, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02189-EGS Document 11 Filed 03/02/12 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                       [HENRY & PETERS, P.C. LETTERHEAD]

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated November 14, 1997, on the
consolidated financial statements of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended September 30, 1997, in Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.'s
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997.



                              /s/ HENRY & PETERS, P.C.
                              HENRY & PETERS, P.C.





Tyler, Texas
December 22, 1997
§ 11.427 Requirements for mate of near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 200 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify for the endorsement as mate of near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 200 GRT is— ( 1 ) Twelve months of total service in the deck department of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled, sail, or auxiliary sail vessels. Service on Great Lakes and inland waters may substitute for up to 6 months of the required service; or
( 2 ) Three months of service in the deck department of self-propelled vessels operating on ocean, near-coastal, Great Lakes, or inland waters while holding a license or MMC endorsement as master of inland self-propelled, sail, or auxiliary sail vessels of less than 200 GRT.
( b ) The holder of a license or MMC endorsement as operator of uninspected passenger vessels with a near-coastal route endorsement may obtain this endorsement by successfully completing an examination on rules and regulations for small passenger vessels.
( c ) To obtain this officer endorsement for sail or auxiliary sail vessels, the applicant must submit evidence of 6 months of deck service on sail or auxiliary sail vessels.
( d ) A license or MMC endorsement as master of near-coastal self-propelled vessels may be endorsed as mate of sail or auxiliary sail vessels upon presentation of 3 months of service on sail or auxiliary sail vessels.
( e ) To obtain a tonnage endorsement for 100 GRT or more, the applicant must complete the additional examination topics indicated in subpart I of this part.
( f ) Holders of this endorsement are considered to be in compliance with the STCW Convention (incorporated by reference, see § 11.102) while operating within the limitations of this endorsement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5

<MULTIPLIER>            1,000



<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                            39,547
<SECURITIES>                                                     321,375
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     20,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                        8,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 398,763
<PP&E>                                                           138,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    27,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   619,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             46,073
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                              30
<OTHER-SE>                                                       115,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     619,848
<SALES>                                                           78,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  78,244
<CGS>                                                             63,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     63,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  67,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               (7,907)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (9,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (9,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (9,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.30)



</TABLE>
§ 75.444 General costs of government. ( a ) For states, local governments, and Indian Tribes, the general costs of government are unallowable (except as provided in § 75.474). Unallowable costs include: ( 1 ) Salaries and expenses of the Office of the Governor of a state or the chief executive of a local government or the chief executive of an Indian tribe;
( 2 ) Salaries and other expenses of a state legislature, tribal council, or similar local governmental body, such as a county supervisor, city council, school board, etc., whether incurred for purposes of legislation or executive direction;
( 3 ) Costs of the judicial branch of a government;
( 4 ) Costs of prosecutorial activities unless treated as a direct cost to a specific program if authorized by statute or regulation (however, this does not preclude the allowability of other legal activities of the Attorney General as described in § 75.435); and
( 5 ) Costs of other general types of government services normally provided to the general public, such as fire and police, unless provided for as a direct cost under a program statute or regulation.
( b ) For Indian tribes and Councils of Governments (COGs) (see § 75.2 *Local government*), up to 50% of salaries and expenses directly attributable to managing and operating Federal programs by the chief executive and his or her staff can be included in the indirect cost calculation without documentation.
§ 98.20 A child's eligibility for child care services. ( a ) To be eligible for services under § 98.50, a child shall, at the time of eligibility determination or redetermination: ( 1 ) ( i ) Be under 13 years of age; or,
( ii ) At the option of the Lead Agency, be under age 19 and physically or mentally incapable of caring for himself or herself, or under court supervision;
( 2 ) ( i ) Reside with a family whose income does not exceed 85 percent of the State's median income (SMI), which must be based on the most recent SMI data that is published by the Bureau of the Census, for a family of the same size; and
( ii ) Whose family assets do not exceed $1,000,000 (as certified by such family member); and
( 3 ) ( i ) Reside with a parent or parents who are working or attending a job training or educational program; or
( ii ) Receive, or need to receive, protective services, which may include specific populations of vulnerable children as identified by the Lead Agency, and reside with a parent or parents other than the parent(s) described in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. ( A ) At grantee option, the requirements in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may be waived for families eligible for child care pursuant to this paragraph, if determined to be necessary on a case-by-case basis.
( B ) At grantee option, the waiver provisions in paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(A) of this section apply to children in foster care when defined in the Plan, pursuant to § 98.16(g)(7).
( b ) A grantee or other administering agency may establish eligibility conditions or priority rules in addition to those specified in this section and § 98.46, which shall be described in the Plan pursuant to § 98.16(i)(5), so long as they do not: ( 1 ) Discriminate against children on the basis of race, national origin, ethnic background, sex, religious affiliation, or disability;
( 2 ) Limit parental rights provided under subpart D of this part;
( 3 ) Violate the provisions of this section, § 98.46, or the Plan. In particular, such conditions or priority rules may not be based on a parent's preference for a category of care or type of provider. In addition, such additional conditions or rules may not be based on a parent's choice of a child care certificate; or
( 4 ) Impact eligibility other than at the time of eligibility determination or redetermination.
( c ) For purposes of implementing the citizenship eligibility verification requirements mandated by title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, 8 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.,* only the citizenship and immigration status of the child, who is the primary beneficiary of the CCDF benefit, is relevant. Therefore, a Lead Agency or other administering agency may not condition a child's eligibility for services under § 98.50 based upon the citizenship or immigration status of their parent or the provision of any information about the citizenship or immigration status of their parent.
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 67579, Sept. 30, 2016]
#### § 110.30-5 Inspection for certification.

Electric installations and electric equipment must be inspected at the inspection for certification and periodic inspection to determine mechanical and electrical condition and performance. Particular note must be made of circuits added or modified after the original issuance of the Certificate of Inspection.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6504, Feb. 9, 2000]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-5162 September Term, 2013

1:11-cv-01841-JEB

Filed On: May 29, 2014

Wendy E. Wagner, et al.,

Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown,

Griffith, Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Millett, Pillard, and Wilkins, 

Circuit Judges

O R D E R

It is, on the court’s own motion,

ORDERED that this case be set for oral argument on Tuesday, September 30,

2014, at 9:30 a.m. before the en banc court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, by 4:00 p.m. on June 30, 2014, the parties and amici

curiae file 15 additional paper copies of the previously-filed briefs, supplemental briefs,

and joint appendix.

A separate order will issue regarding allocation of oral argument time. 

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #13-5162 Document #1495024 Filed: 05/29/2014 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONI, Gerald K. Carlson,Chief Executive Officer of Phibro Animal HealthCorporation, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Phibro Animal HealthCorporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006     /s/ Gerald K. Carlson         Gerald K. Carlson,    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 92.304 Procedures for health programs and activities administered by the Department. ( a ) The procedural provisions applicable to section 504 shall apply with respect to administrative enforcement actions against the Department, including Federally-facilitated Exchanges, concerning discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, or any combination thereof, under section 1557 or this part. These procedures are found at 45 CFR 85.61 and 85.62. Where this section cross-references regulatory provisions that use the term “handicap,” the term “race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability, or any combination thereof,” shall apply in its place.
( b ) The Department must permit access by OCR to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with section 1557 or this part. Where any information required of the Department is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution or person, and the other agency, institution or person fails or refuses to furnish this information, the Department shall so certify and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. Asserted considerations of privacy or confidentiality may not operate to bar OCR from evaluating or seeking to enforce compliance with section 1557 or this part. Information of a confidential nature obtained in connection with compliance evaluation or enforcement shall not be disclosed except where necessary under the law.
( c ) The Department must not intimidate, threaten, coerce, retaliate, or otherwise discriminate against any individual or entity for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 1557 or this part, or because such individual or entity has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under section 1557 or this part. The identity of complainants must be kept confidential by OCR in accordance with applicable Federal law.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: March 7-8, 2007.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, 
MD 20817, 301-594-4952, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ff3f6f1f7aedff2fef6f3b1f1f6f7b1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f995909791c8b994989095d7979091d79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1096 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>