alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 7, 2014

s0204

Order 

Clerk

February 7, 2014

147612

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147612

COA: 309951

Washtenaw CC: 09-002072-FH

ROBERT PAUL GEORGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the April 9, 2012 order of the Washtenaw Circuit 

Court. It appears that the circuit court did not recognize that it could exercise its 

discretion to modify the method of the defendant’s restitution payment under MCL 

780.766(12), even where the defendant’s restitution stemmed from a plea agreement. 

The statute makes no distinction between restitution ordered as a part of a plea agreement 

or otherwise. We REMAND this case to the circuit court for a determination under the 

statute whether payment under the existing order will impose a manifest hardship on the 

defendant or his immediate family, and whether modifying the method of payment will 

impose a manifest hardship on the victims. Upon making these determinations, the 

circuit court may, in its discretion, determine whether to modify the method of payment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TREMAIN JONES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LYNN PARRISH, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

 / 

 

Case No. 14-13153 

Honorable Linda V. Parker 

 

ORDER CORRECTING SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 OPINION AND ORDER 

AND REINSTATING DEFENDANT D. MAYNARD

On August 14, 2014, Plaintiff Tremain Jones (“Plaintiff”) commenced this 

lawsuit against fifty-two defendants which include the Michigan Department of 

Corrections (“MDOC”) and MDOC employees. Most of the individual defendants 

named in Plaintiff’s complaint work or have worked at one of the four correctional 

facilities where Plaintiff has been incarcerated. In his Complaint, Plaintiff asserts 

twelve separate counts that claim violations of his federal constitutional rights, 

federal statutes, and state law. The matter has been assigned to Magistrate Judge 

Anthony P. Patti for all pretrial proceedings, including a hearing and determination 

of all non-dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report 

and recommendation (“R&R”) on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B). 

4:14-cv-13153-LVP-APP Doc # 54 Filed 11/12/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 990
2 

On August 12, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patti issued an R&R with respect to 

motions to sever filed by several defendants. (ECF No. 41.) In his R&R, 

Magistrate Judge Patti recommended granting in part the motions and dismissing 

without prejudice Plaintiff’s causes of action that do not arise from alleged 

misconduct at the Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility (“IBC”). (Id.) Magistrate 

Judge Patti also recommended that the Court dismiss any defendants who were not 

involved in the activities at IBC. (Id.) Stated differently, Magistrate Judge Patti 

“recommend[ed] that the action proceed against only the IBC Defendants (McKee, 

Parrish, Maynard, Kimble, Ryan, Walker, Bolton, Bradley, Franks, Schooley, 

Curtis, Russell, and Heyns) and the MDOC.” (Id. at Pg ID 906.) 

On September 25, 2015, this Court issued an opinion and order adopting 

Magistrate Judge Patti’s recommendations. (ECF No. 48.) In this decision, 

however, the Court accidentally included Maynard in the list of individuals to be 

dismissed from the action. (Id. at Pg ID 950.) The Court therefore is 

REINSTATING Maynard as a party to this action. The Court additionally notes 

that while the R&R refers to Curtis, Russell, and Heyns as “IBC Defendants”, see 

supra, these individuals do not appear to be IBC correctional employees. 

Nevertheless, as Plaintiff’s allegations against these three defendants relate to the 

4:14-cv-13153-LVP-APP Doc # 54 Filed 11/12/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 991
3 

activities at IBC, the action will proceed against them. 

SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Linda V. Parker 

 LINDA V. PARKER 

 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: November 12, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of 

record and/or pro se parties on this date, November 12, 2015, by electronic and/or 

U.S. First Class mail. 

 s/ Richard Loury 

 Case Manager 

4:14-cv-13153-LVP-APP Doc # 54 Filed 11/12/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 992
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1879 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1879

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and 
   reemployment rights for certain individuals ordered to full-time 
                          National Guard duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

 Mr. Coffman of Colorado (for himself and Ms. Bordallo) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and 
   reemployment rights for certain individuals ordered to full-time 
                          National Guard duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Employment Protection 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS FOLLOWING CERTAIN NATIONAL GUARD DUTY.

    (a) Reemployment Rights.--Section 4312(c)(4) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (D);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) ordered to full-time National Guard duty 
                under the provisions of section 502(f) of title 32 when 
                the period of duty is designated by the Secretary of 
                Defense as covered by this subparagraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (F) of section 4312(c)(4) of 
title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
with respect to an individual ordered to full-time National Guard duty 
under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, on or after 
September 11, 2001, and shall entitle such individual to rights and 
benefits under chapter 43 of title 38 of such Code on or after that 
date.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 95.10 Time limit for claiming payment for expenditures made before October 1, 1979.

Under the programs listed in § 95.1, we will pay a State for a State agency expenditure made before October 1, 1979, only if the State filed or files a claim with us for that expenditure before January 1, 1981. Section 95.19 lists the exceptions to this rule.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-14-13710 

 Hon. SEAN F. COX 

 v. 

R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL 

HOMES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________________________________________________/ 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE MARCH 31, 2016 MOTION DEADLINE FOR BOTH 

PARTIES UNTIL APRIL 7, 2016 

 Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to 

the entry of an order extending the March 31, 2016 motion deadline for both Plaintiff and 

Defendant for one week until Thursday April 7, 2016. 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK, P.C. 

/s/ Dale Price* /s/ Joel J. Kirkpatrick 

DALE PRICE (P55578) JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK (P62851) 

Trial Attorney Attorney for Defendant 

EEOC 843 Penniman Ave., Ste. 201 

Detroit Field Office Plymouth, MI 48170 

Patrick V McNamara joel@joelkirkpatrick.com

477 Michigan Ave., Rm. 865 (734) 404-5710 

Detroit, MI 48226 (866) 241-4152 Fax 

Dale.Price@EEOC.Gov 

(313) 226-7808 

(313) 226-6584 Fax 

*signed by consent of counsel 3-15-2016

2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG Doc # 49 Filed 03/15/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 584
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-13710 

 Hon. SEAN F. COX 

 v. 

R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL 

HOMES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER 

 In light of the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the March 31, 2016 motion 

deadline for both Plaintiff and Defendant be extended for one week until Thursday April 7, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 15, 2016 s/ Sean F. Cox 

 Sean F. Cox 

 U. S. District Judge 

2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG Doc # 49 Filed 03/15/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 585
#### Sec. 11 Reports to the owner.

The agent shall submit to the local District Finance Officer of the owner, in triplicate, not later than 20 days after the end of each month, its general ledger trial balance and such schedules and support thereof as may be required. The agent shall also submit to the owner, in original and four copies, not later than 10 days after the end of each month a statement in the form and content to be prescribed reflecting cash receipts and cash disbursements for the preceding month and cumulative totals for the year to date; the original and one copy will be transmitted to the local District Finance Officer and three copies will be transmitted to the Chief, Office of Finance, Maritime Administration, Washington.

[FIS-1, 16 FR 2885, Apr. 3, 1951, as amended at 33 FR 5952, Apr. 18, 1968. Redesignated at 45 FR 44587, July 1, 1980]
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) or 15
(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of IRIDEX Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure control and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures , as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control
over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By: /s/ LARRY TANNENBAUMName: Larry TannenbaumTitle: Chief Financial Officer and Vice President,
Administration(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|           DATE:  September 20, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Marius Silvasan     |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                            |   | Marius Silvasan         |
|                                                                                            |   | Chief Executive Officer |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6435

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRYANT KELLY PRIDE, a/k/a Pride,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-2)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Kelly Pride, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, 

Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Mary Kathleen 

Carnell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Kelly Pride appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction 

of sentence.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Pride, No. 1:08-cr-00024-JPJRSB-2 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 3, 2015; entered Mar. 4, 2015). We

deny as unnecessary Pride’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although Pride noted an appeal from the district court’s 

order, he has proffered no argument on appeal specifying any 

error by the district court in granting his motion.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.1


               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


West Coast Entertainment Corporation
9998 Global Road, 2nd Floor
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  19115


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of West Coast Entertainment Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-31831, 333-14405, 33-14411 and 333-1109) of our report dated May 12, 2000 on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of West Coast Entertainment
Corporation as of February 6, 2000 and January 31, 1999, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



BDO Seidman, LLP



Los Angeles, California
May 22, 2000
§ 79.18 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to— ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this part.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to find Federal statutes or regulations invalid.
§ 112.15-5 Final emergency loads. On vessels required to have a final emergency power source by § 112.05-5(a) of this chapter, the following emergency lighting and power loads must be arranged so that they can be energized from the final emergency power source: ( a ) Each load under § 112.15-1.
( b ) The machinery, controls, and alarms for each passenger elevator.
( c ) Each charging panel for: ( 1 ) Temporary emergency batteries;
( 2 ) Starting batteries for diesel engines or gas turbines that drive emergency generators; and
( 3 ) General alarm batteries.
( d ) One of the bilge pumps, if the emergency power source is its source of power to meet Part 56 of this chapter.
( e ) One of the fire pumps, if the emergency power source is its source of power to meet the requirements of the subchapter under which the vessel is certificated.
( f ) Each sprinkler system, water spray extinguishing system, or foam system pump.
( g ) If necessary, the lube oil pump for each propulsion turbine and reduction gear, propulsion diesel reduction gear, and ship's service generator turbine which needs external lubrication.
( h ) Each rudder angle indicator.
( i ) Each radio or global maritime distress and safety system (GMDSS) component.
( j ) Each radio direction finder, radar, gyrocompass, depth sounder, global positioning system (GPS), satellite navigation system (SATNAV), speed log, rate-of-turn indicator and propeller pitch indicator.
( k ) Each steering gear feeder, if required by part 58, subpart 58.25, of this chapter.
( l ) Each general emergency alarm flashing light required by § 113.25-10 of this chapter.
( m ) Each electric blow-out-preventer control system.
( n ) Any permanently installed diving equipment that is dependent upon the vessel's or drilling unit's power.
( o ) Each emergency generator starting compressor, as allowed by § 112.50-7(c)(3)(ii).
( p ) Each steering gear failure alarm required by part 113, subpart 113.43, of this chapter.
( q ) The ballast control system on each column-stabilized mobile offshore drilling unit.
( r ) Each vital system automation load required by part 62 of this chapter.
( s ) Motor-operated valves for each cargo oil and fuel oil system, if the emergency power source is the source of power to meet § 56.60(d) of this chapter.
( t ) Each ship's stabilizer wing, unless a separate source of emergency power is supplied.
( u ) Each indicator that shows the position of the stabilizer wings, if the emergency power source is its emergency source of power.
( v ) Each smoke extraction fan, not including smoke detector sampling, and carbon dioxide or clean agent exhaust fans for spaces.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15267, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28287, June 4, 1996; 61 FR 36787, July 12, 1996; USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60003, Sept. 29, 2010; USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33882, June 7, 2012]
#### Alma H. Potter, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alvin Potter, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Charles P. H. Gilbert, Respondent.

*Potter*v. *Gilbert,*130 App. Div. 632, affirmed.

(Argued November 15, 1909;

decided November 30, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an' order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the’ first judicial depart*577ment, entered March 5,1909, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant’s negligence.

*Leavitt J. Hunt*and *Robert McLeod Jackson*for appellant.

*William B.*Ilornblower, *W. W. Miller*and *J. Norris Miller*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Geay, Edwaed T. Babtlett, Haight, Weenee, Willabd Babtlett and Chase, JJ.
Presidential Documents

11283 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 48 

Tuesday, March 13, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of March 5, 2007 

Assignment of Certain Functions Relating to Procurement 

Sanctions on Persons Engaging in Export Activities that Contribute to Proliferation 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treasury[,] 

the Secretary of Defense[,] the Secretary of Commerce[, and] the Director 

of National Intelligence 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

the functions of the President under section 821 of the Foreign Relations 

Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 6301) are assigned 

to the Secretary of State, except that the function of the President under 

section 821(c)(2)(A) is assigned to the Secretary of Defense. 

In the performance of their respective functions under this memorandum, 

the Secretaries of State and Defense shall, as appropriate, consult each 

other, the Secretaries of the Treasury and Commerce, and the heads of 

other departments and agencies. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 5, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–1195 

Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS-1GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Phyllis Stallings, Ed.D.,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 14-13189

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

Detroit Public Schools, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Granting Defendant’s Amended Motion for

Summary Judgment entered October 28, 2015, judgment is entered in favor of

Defendant and against Plaintiff.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan on October 28, 2015.

David J. Weaver

Clerk of the Court

Approved:

 BY: /s/ Linda Vertriest

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Case 2:14-cv-13189-VAR-RSW ECF No. 27 filed 10/28/15 PageID.627 Page 1 of 1