T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a )( 2 ). A cc o rd in g ly, L eb b o s’s “W a iv e ro f

A r g u m e n t,” f

ile d o n O c to b e r1 9 , 2 0 0 9 is d e n ie d a s m o o t. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n th e ma tt e ro f: BE TS EY W ARRE N LEBBO S. BETSEY W A RREN LEBBO S, A p p e lla n t, v. LI ND A SCHUETT E, A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 15668 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 8 9 6 - FCD ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia F r a nk C . D a m r e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T R O T T , G O U L D , a n d R A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . B et se y W arre n L ebbo s app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s order 

# FI LED NO V 01 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 15668 2 af firm in g th e b an k ru p tcy c o u rt’s o rd ero f F eb ru ary 1 3 , 2 0 0 8 aw ar d in g atto rn ey ’s fees an d co st s t o ch ap t er 7 b an k ru p t cy tru st ee L i n d a S ch u ett e as a san ct i o n ag ai n st L ebbo s, and the bank rupt cycourt ’ s orderof June 18 , 20 08 aw ar di ng addi t i on al c o s t s t o Sc h u e tt e a s th e p r e v a i l i n g p a rty . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 5 8 ( d ) . W e r e v ie w in d e p e n d e n tlyth e b a n k ru p tc yc o u rt’s o r d e r s . L ei cht y v . N e ar y( I n r e Str and) , 37 5 F . 3d 85 4, 85 7 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). W e m ustconsi der ju r is d ic tio n s u as p o n te . G r e e ne v . U ni te d State s (

I n r e Souz a) , 795 F . 2d 855, 857 n. 1 ( 9th C i r . 1986) . W e a f f i rm i n pa rt , va c a t e i n pa rt , a nd r e m a nd. T h e b a n k ru p tc y c o u rt d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b ya w a r d in g S c h u e tte c o s ts in its o r d e ro f

J u n e 1 8 , 2 0 0 8 . See F e d. R . B a nkr . P . 7054( b) ( s t a t i ng tha tthe bank rupt cycourtm ayaw ar d cost s t o the prevai l i ng party i n an adv er sary p r o c e e d in g u n le s s o th e rw is e p r o h ib ite d b yf e d e r a l o rb a n k ru p tc yla w ) ; s e e al s o 28 U .S .C . § 1 9 2 0 ( lis tin g r e c o v e r ab le c o s ts ) . T he di stri ctcourtl ac ked subj ec tm att erj uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the F ebruary 13 , 20 08 order aw ar di ng att orney’ s f ee s and cost s bec ause the no t i ce of appeal w as u n tim e lya s to th a t a w a r d . See In re So u za , 795 F . 2d a t857 ( s t a t i ng tha tanot i c e of appe a l m us tbe f

i l e d w i thi n the t i m e pr ovi de d byF e d. R . B a nkr . P . 8002 a nd “ [ t ] he unt i m e l y f

i l i ng of the not i c e of

appe a l i s j ur i s di c t i ona l ” ) . A c c or di ngl y , w e r e m a nd t o the di s tr i c tc ourtw i th i ns truc t i ons t o va c a t e the port i on of i t s de c i s i on r e vi e w i ng09- 15668 3 th e F e b ru a ry 1 3 , 2 0 0 8 o r d e r . Se e id. a t858. L ebbo s’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. S c h u e tte s h a ll r e c o v e rh e rc o s ts o n ap p e a l. AF F I RME D i n p a r t , V AC AT E D i n p a r t , a n d RE MAND E D.