UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

PAUL POZNIAK, 

 Petitioner, Civil No. 1:14-cv-12649 

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

v. 

MARY BERGHUIS, 

 

 Respondent. 

 / 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND STAY AS MOOT, GRANTING MOTION 

TO REOPEN CASE, DIRECTING RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND DENYING 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 

 Paul Pozniak, a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On September 10, 2014, this Court entered an opinion and order 

holding the case in abeyance so that Petitioner could exhaust his state court remedies. ECF No. 

6. The Court also administratively closed the case. Petitioner has now filed a motion to reopen 

the case. 

 Federal courts have the power to order that a habeas petition be reinstated upon timely 

request by a habeas petitioner. See Woods v. Gilmore, 26 F. Supp. 2d 1093, 1095 (C.D. Ill. 

1998); Parisi v. Cooper, 961 F. Supp. 1247, 1249 (N.D. Ill. 1997). Because it appears that 

Petitioner filed his motion to reopen the case within 30 days of exhausting his state court 

remedies in the Michigan Supreme Court, he has complied with the Court’s order staying the 

case and his petition is now ripe for consideration. Accordingly, the Court will order that the case 

be reopened. 

 Petitioner filed a motion to extend the stay on July 18, 2016, stating that he intended to 

pursue DNA testing of evidence used at his trial under Michigan Compiled Laws 777.16. That 

1:14-cv-12649-TLL-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 11/04/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 724
- 2 - 

motion will be denied as moot because Petitioner has moved to reopen his case within 30 days of 

completing post-conviction review proceedings under Michigan Court Rule 6.501 et seq. 

 Petitioner also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. The Court has broad discretion 

in determining whether counsel should be appointed. Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 

(6th Cir. 1987). A habeas petitioner may obtain representation at any stage of the case 

“[w]henever the United States magistrate or the court determines that the interests of justice so 

require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). In this case, the Court finds that it is premature to 

determine whether justice requires appointment of counsel. The Court will reconsider this 

request on its own motion after the Respondent has filed its responsive pleading and submitted 

the state court record. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to reinstate, ECF No. 10, is 

GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is 

REINSTATED to the Court’s active docket. 

It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the amended 

petition, ECF No. 9, on the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Appellate Division. 

It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall file a responsive pleading and the Rule 5 

materials by May 3, 2017.

 It is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to extend stay, ECF No. 8, is DENIED

as moot. 

 It is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 11, is 

DENIED without prejudice. 

1:14-cv-12649-TLL-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 11/04/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 725
- 3 - 

Dated: November 4, 2016 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on November 4, 2016. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:14-cv-12649-TLL-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 11/04/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 726