alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 75.333 HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity review. ( a ) The non-Federal entity must make available, upon request of the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity, technical specifications on proposed procurements where the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity believes such review is needed to ensure that the item or service specified is the one being proposed for acquisition. This review generally will take place prior to the time the specification is incorporated into a solicitation document. However, if the non-Federal entity desires to have the review accomplished after a solicitation has been developed, the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity may still review the specifications, with such review usually limited to the technical aspects of the proposed purchase.
( b ) The non-Federal entity must make available upon request, for the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity pre-procurement review, procurement documents, such as requests for proposals or invitations for bids, or independent cost estimates, when: ( 1 ) The non-Federal entity's procurement procedures or operation fails to comply with the procurement standards in this part;
( 2 ) The procurement is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded without competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation;
( 3 ) The procurement, which is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, specifies a “brand name” product;
( 4 ) The proposed contract is more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded to other than the apparent low bidder under a sealed bid procurement; or
( 5 ) A proposed contract modification changes the scope of a contract or increases the contract amount by more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
( c ) The non-Federal entity is exempt from the pre-procurement review in paragraph (b) of this section if the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that its procurement systems comply with the standards of this part. ( 1 ) The non-Federal entity may request that its procurement system be reviewed by the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity to determine whether its system meets these standards in order for its system to be certified. Generally, these reviews must occur where there is continuous high-dollar funding, and third party contracts are awarded on a regular basis;
( 2 ) The non-Federal entity may self-certify its procurement system. Such self-certification must not limit the HHS awarding agency's right to survey the system. Under a self-certification procedure, the HHS awarding agency may rely on written assurances from the non-Federal entity that it is complying with these standards. The non-Federal entity must cite specific policies, procedures, regulations, or standards as being in compliance with these requirements and have its system available for review.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-149662 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of EnteroMedics Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the January 1, 2006, adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/S/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 
|Minneapolis, MN March 5,
2009
§ 108.653 Helicopter facilities. ( a ) Each helicopter fueling facility must be marked adjacent to the fueling hose storage: “WARNING—HELICOPTER FUELING STATION—KEEP LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY”.
( b ) Each storage tank for helicopter fuel must be marked: “DANGER—FLAMMABLE LIQUID”.
( c ) Each access to a helicopter landing area must be marked: “BEWARE OF TAIL ROTOR”.
( d ) Each marking required by this section must be in letters at least 7.5 centimeters (3 inches) high.
§ 95.623 Reconsideration of denied FFP for failure to obtain prior approval. For ADP equipment and services acquired by a State without prior approval, which is reflected in a record, the State may request reconsideration of the disallowance of FFP by written request to the head of the Federal program office within 30 days of the initial written disallowance determination. In such a reconsideration, the agency may take into account overall federal interests. The Department may grant a request for reconsideration if: ( a ) The State submitted to the Department all information required under § 95.611, satisfactorily responded to all concerns raised by the Department and received a final letter of approval from the Department; or,
( b ) The State requests reconsideration of a denial by submitting in a record information that addresses the following requirements: ( 1 ) The acquisition must be reasonable, useful and necessary;
( 2 ) The State's failure to obtain prior approval, which is reflected in a record, must have been inadvertent (i.e., the State did not knowingly avoid the prior approval requirements);
( 3 ) The request was not previously denied by HHS;
( 4 ) The acquisition must otherwise meet all other applicable Federal and State requirements, and would have been approved under part 95, subpart F had the State requested in a record, prior approval;
( 5 ) The State must not have a record of recurrent failures, under any of the programs covered by the prior approval regulations, to comply with the requirement to obtain prior approval in a record, of its automatic data processing acquisitions (i.e., submissions under these procedures, from States that have failed in the past to acquire prior approval which is reflected in a record, in accordance with part 95, subpart F, may be denied);
[51 FR 3339, Jan. 27, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 4378, Feb. 7, 1990; 75 FR 66340, Oct. 28, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1817 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1817

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the ``John S. 
                     Wilder Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2009

  Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. Davis of Tennessee) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the ``John S. 
                     Wilder Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN S. WILDER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, shall be 
known and designated as the ``John S. Wilder Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John S. 
Wilder Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 
 CERTIFICATION I, Kevin M. Frain, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of barnesandnoble.com inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2004 By:
    /s/ Kevin M. FrainKevin M. FrainChief Financial Officer and Vice President,
Operations
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
barnesandnoble.com inc. 23
x.************* * -conn . JOURNfiL - ****************** * DATEMfiY-02-200 0 **** * TIM Eli:i 5 ** * P.9 1 MOD E= MEMOR

Y TRftNSMlSSIO NSTRRT=MftY-0 2 11:1 3 eND=MPlY-0 2 11:1 5 FIL ENa. = 0i e • . * ST NND . CO

M fiBBRNO . STfiT I O NNfiME/TEL.NO . PfiGE S DURATION ' 00 1 O

K s 9120251^839 5 002/00 2 00:00'37 " -SUPERFUN

D DI U )f>«>+<>K)|f*>)<>^<*jt(>l<;^(>(<^j+(»(>+<>+<>f)K)fj+(>^<>»<>«********** * - - :.^^yv^ ^- 2146656460 - ******** *



## SUPERFUN D BRANC

H OFFIC E O FREGIONALCOUNSE L U.S . EPA REGIO N 6 ^p ^ 1445RossAvenue , Ste . 120 0 XT ^ ^ Dallas , Texa s 75202-273 3 n i jF ^ i j



# ^^..^^ ^ l - Telephon e No . (214 ) 665-2134 , 213 5 g V^W V 5 Telefax No . (214 ) 665-646 0 

# %2IE ' ^^«*CJ< ^ FACSIMIL E TRANSMISSIO N FROM : TO ; SUBJ : 

# 7<^^y ^ TTXXS X



# 74.rvJA ^ C.o > COMMENTS : 

### y4tj. - t47(rXX .

TOTA LNO . PAGES : 

## SEN TBY : ^44}:yy-

y DATE/TEM

E PMXTXAAZT . 

# (7 ^ ~ -^Z~PZ1ZZZZ7 1 905036 0 

# llllllllllilillllllllllllllilllllilllllll l
§ 111.05-15 Neutral grounding. ( a ) Each propulsion, power, lighting, or distribution system having a neutral bus or conductor must have the neutral grounded.
( b ) The neutral of a dual-voltage system must be solidly grounded at the generator switchboard.
#### § 10.105 Paperwork approval. [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Qi Tang, the Chief Executive Officer of Nevaeh
Enterprises Ltd. (the "Company") hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2010, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended,
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2011

/s/ _Qi Tang__
Qi Tang
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 96.80 Scope.

This subpart applies to the low-income home energy assistance program.
July 17,2014 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

US Secretary ofTransportation 

DOT Office of the Secretary 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

MAYOR'S OFFICE I Matt Bemrich, Mayor I David R. Fierke, City Manager 

u 

Sent Electronically via E-Mail 

RE: Petition of Fort Dodge, IA for a Two-Year Waiver from the 10-Enplanement Statute 

Docket-DOT -OST -200 1-l 0682 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

On behalf of the City of Fort Dodge, I am submitting this petition for a two-year exemption from 49 

U.S.C. § 41731(a)( l)(B) in terminating our EAS eligibility based upon the 10 passenger per day statute. 

This request is based upon airport enplanement history and the fact that our air carrier suspended all air 

service on February 1, 2014 due to a pilot shortage. 

The data shows that the airport had 9.4 passengers per day during the measurement period. We missed 

reaching the 10 passenger per day statue by only 16 passengers per month. During this time period, the 

air carrier cancelled 54 flights due to mechanicals and no crew equally 1,026 available seats. The airport 

history data demonstrates that 2013 was not a typical year and in fact, was the lowest number of 

enplanements on record since 1976. The DOT data shows that during the past ten years prior to 2013, we 

averaged more than 24 passenger enplanements per day. 

We are requesting a two year exemption waiver because we will be in this category again in 2014 due to 

the air carrier's decision to suspend our service on February 1, 2014. I feel that including us on the 

termination list when we did not have an air carrier providing air service does not meet the intent of the 

statute. 

Our City has been planning and working creatively to enhance our appeal as a regional center for retail 

and services for a large geographic area of Central and North Iowa. In addition to new and enhanced 

shopping, our community is working to enhance or trails, leisure time, and quality of life features. All of 

our planning and implementation ties in with our economic development effotts to grow our regional and 

global footprint. Commercial air service is a key cog in pulling the entire package together of enabling us 

to become sustainable and viable as a location to live, work and play well into the 21st Century. 

We appreciate the opportunity to receive a two year exemption waiver based upon on our history and the 

special circumstances that negatively impacted our airport. 

Sincerely, 

/l!'d@~ 

Mayor Matt Bemrich 

City of Fort Dodge 

Municipal Building • 819 1st Avenue South • Fort Dodge, lA 50501 • Phone: 515.573.7144 • Fax: 515.573.5751 

Email: mayorofdodge@fortdodgeiowa.org
#### § 108.453 Discharge outlets.

Each discharge outlet must be of an approved type.
§ 650.7 Awards affected by international agreements. ( a ) Some NSF awards are made as part of international cooperative research programs. The agreements or treaties underlying many of these programs require an allocation of patent rights different from that provided by the Patent Rights clause in § 650.4(a). Therefore, as permitted by § 401.5(d) of the implementing regulations for the Bayh-Dole Act (37 CFR 401.5(d)), paragraph (b) of the standard Patent Rights clause in § 650.4(a) has been modified to provide that the Foundation may require the grantee to transfer to a foreign government or research performer such rights in any subject invention as are contemplated in the international agreement. The award instrument will identify the applicable agreement or treaty.
( b ) After an invention is disclosed to the Patent Assistant, the recipient of an award subject to an international agreement will be informed as to what rights, if any, it must transfer to foreign participants. Recipients may also ask the Program Manager to provide them with copies of the identified international agreements before or after accepting an award.
§ 95.501 Purpose. This subpart establishes requirements for: ( a ) Preparation, submission, and approval of State agency cost allocation plans for public assistance programs; and
( b ) Adherence to approved cost allocation plans in computing claims for Federal financial participation.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Varsity Group Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2006 |  | /s/ Mark F. Thimmig          
|                    |  | Mark F. Thimmig              
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 86.37 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amount or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance which is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person which provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner which discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance which treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government which requires that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* That the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) Separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex may be provided as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph and § 86.41.
(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682; and sec. 844, Education Amendments of 1974, Pub. L. 93-380, 88 Stat. 484)
[40 FR 24128, June 4, 1975; 40 FR 39506, Aug. 28, 1975]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[030602141-7049-48]


California Bay Watershed Education and Training (B-WET) Program, 
Adult and Community Watershed Education in the Monterey Bay

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; cancellation of solicitation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP) cancels the 
competitive California B-WET Program, Adult and Community Watershed 
Education in the Monterey Bay, for fiscal year 2007 due to insufficient 
funding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seaberry Nachbar, National Marine 
Sanctuary Program, 299 Foam Street, Monterey, CA 93940, or by phone at 
(831) 647-4204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The B-WET Program solicitation was 
originally included in the NOAA Omnibus Notice, Availability of Grant 
Funds for Fiscal Year 2007, published in the Federal Register on 
December 27, 2006. Due to insufficient funding, NMSP cancels the 
competitive grant program announced in that solicitation. NMSP will 
return to the applicants all applications NMSP received in response to 
the solicitation.
    The B-WET Program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance (CFDA) under Grant Program 11.429, California Bay Watershed 
Education and Training Program.

    Dated: March 1, 2007.
Daniel Basta,
Director, National Marine Sanctuary Program.
[FR Doc. 07-1155 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-M