Dec . 1 . 200 8 5;00P M michae l a , /pizz i jr . lo . 445 5 P. 1



### Michae l A . Pizzi . Jr. , P . A .

From : Michae l A , Pizzi , Jr . Date : 

# la-l-z^S ' To : /Vn n Henle y^^|^/|i - Pages : (includin g cover ) 

### Please delive rimmediatel yto : f\r\f \ fwOiC U j ClCfn i



# ^VD& C 

# fin d Pt*1ioners ' r<?pl yfe^icf

c:: >

VOICE . 30 5 231-212 1 - FAX : 30 5 231-212 3 - E-Mail : mPiz2ifr@vahoo.co m 15J7 I A' . U . Oif ' Avi'niH' , Suit e 206A , Mitin n hik.'y , I L ^M)1 4

-~ \lee , 1 . 200 8 5;00P Mmichae l a , pizz i J r , No . 445 5 P . 2 FAAPAR T1 6 AIRPOR TPROCEEDING S DOCKE T FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C . Docke tNo. : 16-08-0 5 ALCA , Inc. , Cylinde rShop , Inc. , Suncoas tAviation , Airlcraf tPart s an d Nationa l Aviation , vs . Miami-Dad e County , Florid a / RESPONS E T O MOTIO N T O DISMIS S AN D REPL YBRIE F O F PETITIONER S I . INTRODUCTIO N Th e County' s Motio n t o Dismis s i s frivolou s a s i tignore s th e thousand s o fpage s o f document s (tw o phon e bool^s ) tha thav e bee n submitte d t o th e FA Aan d County , includin g al l o fth e relevan tleases , correspondence , newspapers articles , letters , etc . It s onl y relevanc e I s tha ti tsignal s th e County' s awarenes s o fth e nee d t o divert.attentio n fro m th e establishe d recor d o feconomi cdiscriminatio n an d violation s o fGran tAssuranc e 22 . A s fo rth e respons e t o th e Part1 6 complaint , th e County' s respons e contain s multipl e admission s that , eve n withou tfurthe rsubmission s b yth e petitioners , demonstrat e tha t th e centra l point s raise d b ypetitioner s ar e I n fac ttrue . Tha tsaid , th e County' s respons e doe s omitcertai n fact s tha tar e parto fth e uncontroverte d recor d i n thi s caus e an d whic h demonstrat e th e following : 1 . Despit e ove ron e yea rhavin g passe d sinc e th e submissio n o fth e Par t1 3 informa l complain t(an d a neve rendin g strea m o fpromise s t o negotiat e wit h existin g tenant s claimin g economi cdiscrimination) , N O ON E ha s bee n give n a leas e an d everyon e i s bein g evicte d i n a n expedite d fashion . 2 . Al l o fth e complainin g tenant s an d others i n thei rcategoryar e bein g evicte d i n request s fo rexpedite d evictio n proceedings , contrar yt o th e representatio n o fth e County i n bot h th e Par

t1 3 proces s an d i n respons e t o th e instan tcomplaint ; 3 . Multipl e forma l proposal s hav e bee n submitted , bu tnon e hav e receive d an y seriou s consideratio n an d n o amoun t o ffinancia l document s o rproposal s hav e deterre d th e count yo rit s tenant s fro m goin g fonward wit h immediat e evictions ; Th e recor d speaks fo ritself . 4 . Durin g th e pas tyear , th e count yha s no tme tON E TIM E wit h an yo fthes e tenant s o rprovide d an yopportunitie s anywher e a tth e airport : 5 . Th e complainin g tenant s hav e no tonl ysubmitte d proposal s an d financlals , bu t hav e me to n severa l occasion s wit h th e County' s su b tenants . Ye tthe yhav e no treceive d an yo fth e promise d opportunities , a s th e economi cdiscriminatio n bein g perpetuate d ha s shu tsmal l busines s owner s ou to fth e airport ;lee , 1 , 200 8 5;00P M michae l a . pizz i j r . No . 445 5 P . 3

6 . Th e mo m an d po p aviatio n relate d busines s ar e bein g throw n int o th e stree ts o majo rdeveloper s ca n lan d ban k an d chang e th e characte ro fth e airportt o non-aviatio n relate d business , I n developin g a n airportwher e th e smal l aviatio n relate d busines s ar e simpl yno twelcome . A s mor e tim e ha s passe d an d a s th e countyan d it s sub-tenan thav e continue d t o depriv e small , primaril yHispani cowne d businesse s o facces s t o lease s a tth e airport , th e nee d fo rFA

Ainterventio n i s becomin g mor e eviden tan d mor e critical .

II . RESPONS E T O MOTIO N T O DISMIS S Bot h th e informa l Par

t1 3 informa l complain tan d Part1 6 forma l complain s contai n an d attac h tw o phon e book s ful l o fexhibit s ("A " throug h "Q") , includin g al l o fth e relevan t lease s an d publi crecords , man yo fwhic h ar e site d t o i n th e County' s ow n response . I n th e man ymonth s tha tth e count yha d th e complaint , n o correspondenc e was receive d suggestin g tha tth e exhibit s wer e no tattached , i fso , the ywoul d hav e bee n sen tove r immediately . Referenc e a tthi s poin ti s mad e t o exhibit s "A " throug h "Q " attache d t o bot h complaint s an d als o th e publi crecord s reference d i n thes e complaint s tha tar e al l i n th e county' s possession . Exhibit s "A " throug h "Q " o fth e Part1 3 complain tar e onc e agai n hereb yincorporate d b yreference , a s ar e al l o fth e document s submitte d b yth e county , a s wel l an d publi crecord s alread yi n th e possessio n o fth e FAArelatin g t o al l o flease s reference d herein . I n addition , attache d pleas e fin d a receip tsigne d b yth e Count yexplicitl y acknowledgin g receip to fth e Par t1 6 complain tan d "tw o thic k binders " containin g al l o fth e exhibit s tha tth e count yno wclaim s the yd o no thave . Thus , th e complain ti s supporte d by evidenc e tha tdemonstrate s al l o fth e violation s alleged . Eve n i fthes e exhibit s wer e no tattache d I n phon e boo k for m twice , th e Countyha s i n it s possession , th e AAlease , th e Natol i lease , al l o fth e lease s o fth e complainin g parties , a s wel l a s al l o fth e email s an d evictio n notice s reference d i n thes e documents . Th e Countyi s als o a part yt o th e pendin g evictio n proceeding s an d i s i n possessio n o fth e evictio n notice s an d othe rpubli crecord s relatin g t o thos e proceedings . Th e FA Aals o ha s al l o fth e exhibit s an d record s an d th e instan tmotio n t o dismis s i s bot h factuall ywron g an d frivolous . III . REPL YT O COUNTY' S RESPONS E A . INITIA LMISSTATEMENT S AND/O R OMISSIONS : A s a n Initia l matte rth e county' s respons e trie s t o minimiz e th e lon g ter m natur e o f th e petitioners ' rol e a tth e airport . Althoug h ALCA' s recen tleas e was signe d i n June , 2001 , M^ m)ec, 1 . 200

8 5:00PM michae l a . pizz i Jr . No . 445 5 P . 4 ALC Aha s i n fac tbee n a tenan tatth e airportfo rove rtwent yyears . Likewise , whil e Aircraf t Part s leas e wa s signe d i n 1993 , thi s compan yha s bee n a tth e airportove rtwent yyears . A s fo rth e Cylinde rShop , the yhav e bee n a tth e Airportfo rove rthirt yon e years , a s ha s Nationa l Aviation . Th e County' s respons e referenc e th e mos trecen tleas e whil e Ignorin g th e lon g ter m commitmen to fthes e companie s t o th e airport .

Th e County' s respons e do s no tdisput e th e fac t that , a s note d i n th e complaint , thes e companie s provid e critical , uniqu e an d muc h neede d aviatio n relate d businesse s an d service s a t th e airport , suc h a s trainin g pilot s fo rHomelan d securit yan d maintainin g Ai rForc e aircrafts . Th e Count ydoe s no tdisput e th e factua l assertion s relatin g t o th e aviatio n relate d natur e o fth e complainin g partie s an d th e fac t tha t thei rrol e a t th e airporti s consisten twit h th e typ e o faviatio n relate d busines s tha tar e protecte d unde rFAArules . B . TH E COUNTYHA S FAILE D T O HEE D TH E FAA' S WARNIN G AN D ENGAG E I N GOO D FAIT H NEGOTIATION S WIT H TH E TENANT S A S REQUIRE D I N ORDE R T O COMPL YWIT H GRAN TASSURANC E 2 2 Th e Count ycompletel ymischaracterize s th e FAA' s Respons e t o th e informa l Part 1 3 Complaint . I n it s lette ro fDecembe r11 , 2007 , th e FA Astate d tha t"AAan d th e tenant s shoul d continu e t o negotiat e I n goo d fait h t o com e t o leas e agreements. " Thus , th e FAA' s respons e t o th e Part1 3 Complain twa s t o encourag e th e partie s t o negotiat e an d wa s predicate d upo n assurance s fro m th e Count yan d A Atha teffort s wer e goin g t o b e mad e t o provid e lon g ter m lease s t o th e existin g tenants . I n addition , th e FAA' s preliminary determinatio n I n respons e t o th e Par t1 3 complain twa s base d o n informatio n provide d b y th e Count ytha tassure d th e FA Atha tth e initia l evictio n notice s sen t byAAwer e no t i n fac t goin g t o b e a precurso rfo reviction . Th e Count yexplicitl ystate d tha tth e evictio n notice s wer e merel ysubtl e attempt s a tfacilitatin g negotiatio n tha twoul d lea d t o lon g ter m leases . Specifically , i n hi s lette rdate d Decembe r3 , 2007 , Mr . Southwel l o fMiami-Dad e Aviatio n reporte d tha t"i ti s clea rtha tAA' s inten twas t o captur e th e attentio n o fth e tenant s an d induc e the m t o mak e contactwit h AAs o tha ta meaningfu l discussio n o fth e tenants ' desire s an d AA' s plan s coul d start. " Southwel l wen to n t o furthe rassur e th e FAAtha t eviction s wer e no tforthcoming , bystatin g tha ti fAAtrulywishe d t o evictthes e tenants , "AA woul d hav e th e lette rwit h evictio n agains tal l tenants . That , o fcours e ha s no thappened. " Se e Southwel l letter . Thus , th e FAA' s lac k

o finten/entio n a ttha ttim e was base d o n it s relianc e o n th e wor d o fth e Count ytha tth e sub-tenan twoul d no td o exactl ywha ti ti s nowdoing . Attache d pleas e fin d th e docke tsheet s o fpendin g evictio n action s agains tALCA , Cylinde rShop , an d Aircraf tPart s (al l publi crecord ) disclosin g multipl e pleading s file d b y th e County' s sub-tenan tI n a n attemp tt o obtai n th e mos texpeditiou s evictio n o fal l o fthes e tenants . Thes e pleading s an d ongoin g effort s t o ge tth e courtt o thro wth e complainin g partie s offth e propert yar e no tconsisten twit h th e assertion s mad e I n th e County' s respons e tha tthi s i s no thappening . I ti s wha ti ti s an d th e recor d speak s fo ritself .

ife .)ec, 1 , 200

8 5;00PM michae l a , pizz i jr . No . 445 5 P . 5 Th e point , i s tha ti fth e FA Awer e awar e o fth e fac t tha t AAwa s seekin g immediat e eviction s o fal l o fthes e tenants , wit h n o offer s fro m th e Countyfo ralternativ e space , th e FAA' s decisio n migh thav e bee n quit e differen t Thus , th e repeate d suggestion s tha tth e FAAshoul d b e swaye d bya lette rtha twas predicate d upo n entirel ydifferen t circumstances , i s disingenuous , t o sa yth e least .

C . TH E COUNTYI S WRONG/TH E TENANT S HAV E CONSTANTL YTRIE D T O NEGOTIAT E I N GOO D FAIT H AN D BEE N THWARTE D A TAL LTURN S Th e imag e presente d b yth e Count yi s tha tth e complainin g tenant s hav e don e nothin g t o negotiat e wit h AA . Tha ti s simpl ywrong . Th e trut h i s a s follows : 1 . AAha s refuse d t o provid e th e tenant s wit h an yo fth e mos tbasi cinformatio n neede d t o accommodat e AA' s reques tfo rproposals ; AAtell s th e tenant s the yhav e t o move , bu tneve rprovide s possibl e alternativ e location s an d neve rprovide s promise d lon g rang e plan s t o demonstrat e wher e th e tenant s woul d fi tin ; 2 . Al l o fth e tenants * goo d fait h proposal s an d submission s o ffinancia l dat a hav e falle n upo n de fear s an d no tle d t o an yprogres s i n obtainin g lease s fo ran yo fthes e tenants ; 3 . Th e provisio n o fproposal s ha s no timpede d th e effort s b yA Atowar d expedite d evictions , whic h i s exactl ywha tth e Count ytol d th e FA Adurin g th e Part1 3 process , woul d no thappen . 4 . Th e County' s ongoin g statement s I n responsiv e pleading s t o th e effec ttha t complainin g a tenan thav e no tnegotiate d o rsubmitte d proposals , i s simpl yno ttru e an d ha s neve r bee n true ; Referenc e i s mad e t o exhibit s F throug h I o fth e Par t 1 3 complain t reflectin g proposal s mad e b yCylinde rShop , ALC Aan d Aircraf tPart s t o AAand/o rth e County , al l o f whic h wer e ignored . Attache d pleas e fin d ALC Aan d Aircraft' s mor e recen tletters t o AA , attachin g al l requeste d credi trequest s an d ream s o ffinancia l a data , includin g ta xreturns . Thes e effort s t o compl ywit h request s o fA Ahav e produce d nothing . I n addition , referenc e i s mad e agai n t o exhibi t"F " o fth e Par t1 3 complaint , wherei n Cylinde rSho p i s explici ti n it s busines s pla n and . exhibi t"1" , whic h i s a serie s o femail s fro m th e count ypromisin g Cylinde rsho p a lon g tem n lease . Referenc e i s mad e t o th e attache d mor e recen tlette rfro m Cylinde rsho p reiteratin g fo rth e umpteent h tim e th e sam e proposal . Th e Cylinde rSho p ha s bee n a tOp a Locka Airportfo rove r3 1 year s an d ha s mor e tha n demonstrate d lon g ter m financia l stabilit yb yneve rmissin g a singl e ren t paymen ti n th e entir e 3 2 yea rperiod . Th e Cylinde rShop' s proposa l t o maintai n it s pilo t trainin g an d flightsho p atIts existin g locatio n an d t o receiv e permissio n t o construc ta 10,00 0 squar e foo thange ra tit s ow n expens e a ttha tlocation , ha s bee n i n existenc e fo rlee . 1 . 200

8 5:00PM michae l a . pizz i Jr . No . 445 5 P . 6 man yyear s an d ha s no tchanged . Th e Count yha s submitte d no tone , bu ttw o contrive d declaratio n byCount yemploye e Mari a Ano n t o someho wcom e u p wit h a plausibl e explanatio n a s t o wh yMs . Ano n (o n behal fo fth e County ) infonne d th e Cylinde rSho p tha t the ywoul d b e receivin g a 1 0 t o 1 5 yea rlease , an d the n reneged .

Th e fac ti s tha to n Jun e 2 , 2005 , th e Cylinde rSho p sen ta n emai l t o th e County confinnin g th e ne w1 5 yea rleas e an d state d a s follows : "than k fo rgivin g u s th e ne w lease" , whic h clearl yreference s th e 1 5 leas e discusse d I n th e res to fth e emai l chain . Se e Count yExhibi t"I . Th e Count yha s know n fo rove rthre e an d on e hal fyear s tha tth e Cylinde rSho p wante d a lon g ter m leas e a tthei rexistin g location , wit h th e righ tt o construc ta 10,00 0 squar e foo thanger . I n tum . th e Count yturne d ove rthi s lan d t o A Aan d ha s provide d n o opportunitie s fo rCylinde rShop . Th e recor d coul d no tb e clearer . Cylinde rSho p ha s bee n a n airportfo rove r3 1 years an d neve rmisse d a ren t paymen tan d ha s submitte d it s busines s pla n I n writin g an d verball yo n numerou s occasions . Th e onl yexplanatio n fo rth e lac k o fa n accommodatio n i s economi c discrimination , i n violatio n o fGran tAssuranc e 22 . I n addition , attache d pleas e fin d a composit e exhibi tconsistin g o fletters datin g bac k t o December , 2007 , fro m counse l offerin g t o negotiat e term s wit h AA' s lawyers an d documentin g thei rrefusa l t o provid e a n accommodation .

AA' s REFUSA LT O PROVID E PROMISE D MATERIALS : Attache d pleas e fin d a portio n o fa lette rfro m AA' s attorney s whic h state s a s follows : "I n tur n you requeste d tha tA AAprovid e th e followin g infomiatio n i n orde rfo ryou r client s t o asses s an d prepar e thei rrespectiv e proposals : 1 . Pric e rang e pe rsquar e footag e fo rdevelope d lan d an d tarma cland ; 2 . Locatio n availability ; an d 3 . Temn s reache d wit h othe rtenants. " T o date , non e o fthes e material s hav e eve rbee n provided .)ec , 1 , 200

8 5:01PM michae l a . pizz i J r

. No , 445 5 P . 1 I n addition , attache d pleas e find emai l t o AA' s lawyers offerin g t o mee t an d requestin g " a detaile d busines s plan " tha tha d bee n promised , s o tha tth e tenant s woul d kno wexactl ywha twas bein g mad e available . Thi s emai l wa s sen to n Augus t18 , 200 8 an d t o dat e n o informatio n ha s bee n provided . I n addition , th e tenant s me twit h th e CountyMayo ro n Septembe r11 , 2007 , a s reflecte d i n th e attache d letter s an d als o me twit h AArepresentativ e o n Octobe r5 , 200 7 an d Jun e 20 , 2008 , t o n o avail . Thus , th e recor d i n thi s caus e i s tha tn o matte rwha tth e tenant s do , nothin g stand s i n th e wa yo fth e effort s t o evic tthem forthwith . Thus , th e entir e premis e i n th e County' s respons e tha tther e ar e ongoin g goo d fait h negotiation s i s simpl yno ttrue .

D . COUNTY' S RESPONS E ACKNOWLEDGE S THATTH E COMPLAININ G PARTIE S WER E SUBJECTE D T O DISPARAT E TREATMENT . Throughou tth e response , th e Count yacknowledge s tha tcertai n partie s wer e carve d out , whil e th e complainin g partie s wer e not . Readin g th e County' s respons e i n it s entirely , i tconsist s o ftw o things : 1 . A n admissio n tha tmultipl e parties , bi g an d smal l businesse s (Includin g start-ups ) wer e provide d wit h lon g ter m lease s a tth e sam e tim e tha tth e complainin g tenant s wer e refuse d th e sam e privilege ; 2 . Aserie s o fendles s excuse s tryin g t o justif yth e unjustifiable ; Th e County' s respons e als o admit s tha tothe rsimilarl ysituate d tenant s wer e provide d wit h accommodatio n i n th e for m o flon g term s lease s i n on e o ftw o ways : A . "Tak e back " o flan d fro m th e AAlease ; B . Exclusio n fro m th e A Aleas e i n th e firs tplace . I n othe rwords , th e allegatio n i n th e Par t1 6 Complain ttha tsom e tenant s wer e give n lon g ter m leas e t o th e exclusio n o fth e complainin g tenant s i s i n fac ttrue ; b yth e County' s ow n admission . Paragraph s 2 1 o fth e County' s respons e confirm s wha tth e petitioner s hav e alway s state d an d wha tI s clea rfro m th e attache d leases , namely , tha tcertai n partie s receive d favorabl e treatment . A s admitte d b yth e Count yi n paragrap h 21 ; "eleve n area s wer e excluded " fro m AA' s lease . Thi s include d sectio n 2.0 2 o fAA' s lease , whic h specificall y provide s tha t"th e propert ylease d t o Miam i Executiv e Aviatio n I s no tinclude d I n th e premise s hereunder. " Se e paragrap h 2 1 o fCounty' s Response .)ec. 1 . 200

8 5:01PM michae l a . pizz i Jr . No . 445 5 P . 8 Paragraph s 1 3 an d 1 4 o fth e County' s respons e admi ttha tth e Count yengage d i n "take-back " activitie s unde rth e lon g term s lease s t o Stagecoac h an d late rAA , whic h pemnitte d th e Count yt o "take-back " lan d t o accommodat e existin g tenant s and/o rtenant s wh o ha d bee n negotiatin g wit h th e Countyfo rlon g ter m lease s whe n th e Stagecoac h an d A Alease s wer e signed . Thus , th e count yadmit s i n it s respons e tha twhe n i twante d to , i taccommodate d othe rtenant s wh o wer e i n th e sam e situatio n a s th e complainin g tenants . Th e complainin g tenant s hav e document s tha tthe ysubmitte d proposal s t o th e Count ytha teve n pre-date d th e proposal s o fth e partie s wh o th e count yexercise d "take-back " authorit yt o protect . Ther e i s n o logica l reaso n t o "take-bac k " lan d and/o rexclud e lan d fro m AA's ; leas e t o accommodat e MEA , Natoli , Op a Locka Flightlin e an d others , an d no td o th e sam e fo r partie s tha twer e clearl yi n th e sam e category . Al l o fth e complainin g tenant s shar e th e followin g commo n criteri a wit h al l o fth e tenant s wh o receive d th e benefit s o flon g ten n lease s obligate d wit h eithe rth e "take-back " authorit yo rleas e exclusions ;

1 . The yal l wer e existin g tenants ; an d 2 . The yal l ha d submitte d proposals . Th e count yacknowledge s tha ti tdi d i n fac tengag e i n "take-back " effort s t o accommodat e tenants , eve n a tth e risk o fa lawsui tb yStagecoach . But , th e count yneve r extende d tha tefforttowar d th e complainin g parties .

E . COMPARISO N PETITIONER S AN D OTHERS : 1 . A AAN D PETITIONER S Referenc e i s mad e t o pag e fou rthroug h fiv e o fth e Par t1 3 submissio n (attache d again) , whic h detail s th e following , a s d o th e publi crecord s an d lease s o fth e parties : a . AAwas give n a 5 3 yea rlease ; b . Th e complainin g tenant s wer e give n n o leas e an d ar e bein g evicted ; c . AAca n us e th e mone yreceive d fro m sub.-tenant s t o pa yan yfutur e leas e payments , whil e th e initia l year s ar e free ; d . Th e existin g tenant s hav e t o Inves tthei row n mone yan d hav e neve rreceive d fre e ren to rth e abilit yt o sub-leas e an d hav e th e su b tenant s pay s thei r rent/investment ; e . AAwa s give n ove r18 0 acre s o fland , whil e th e complainin g tenant s hav e bee n give n nothing ;lee . 1 . 200

8 5:01PM michae l a . pizz i Jr . No . 445 5 P . 9 f . A Awas ne wt o th e airportan d ha d n o aviatio n relate d experience , whil e th e existin g tenant s hav e ai l bee n a tth e airportfo rdecade s operatin g aviatio n relate d businesses . 2 . NATOLI . Op a Loc a Fliahtline . th e CD C an d ME Aversu s PETITIONERS : Referenc e i s mad e t o page s fiv e an d si xo fth e Par t1 3 submission , th e County' s responsiv e pleadin g an d th e existin g lease s o fal l partie s t o demonstrat e th e grea tlength s tha tth e Count ywen tt o accommodat e thes e companies , whil e allowin g th e complainin g partie s t o b e evicted . I tshoul d als o b e note d tha tth e Natol i leas e wa s a s th e direc tresul to fa n FA A complain tfile d b yNatol i (attached) . Natoli' s allegation s mirro rthos e o fth e complainin g partie s an d Natol i was accommodated . Th e complainin g partie s wer e not . Natoli' s pla n an d tha to fth e partie s tha twer e accommodate d ar e n o mor e explici ttha n thos e submitte d t o th e complainin g parties - Natol i was cave d ou tfo ra 2 5 yea rleas e an d a hanger , whil e th e complainin g partie s wh o mad e identica l request s receive d nothing . Trut h b e told , A AI s stil l tryin g t o detemnin e it s busines s plan , whic h i s a wor k i n progress . Th e complainin g tenant s actuall yha d a concret e pla n an d ha d bee n ther e longe r an d neve rmisse d a ren tpayment .)ec , 1 . 200 8 5:01P M michae l a , pizz i Jr . No . 445 5 P , 1 0 CONCLUSION S Fo ral l th e reason s state d herein , i t i s requeste d tha t th e FAAinterven e i n thi s matte r an d conside rinvalidatin g th e AAleas e an d insur e tha tth e complainin g partie s ar e provide d wit h th e lon g ter m lease s neede d t o insur e complianc e wit h Gran tAssuranc e 22 . Th e complainin g partie s ar e requestin g th e Count yan d it s sub-tenant s t o compl ywit h Gran t Assuranc e 2 2 an d provid e th e petitioner s wit h lon g ter m leases .

8Dec . 1 . 200 8 5:01P Mmichae l a . pizz i Jr . Jo . 445 5 P . 1 1 Respectfully Submitted , Michae lA . Pizzi , Jr. , P . A . Attorney for

Complainant s 1527 1 NW60*

^Avenue , Suite206- A Miami Lakes , FL3301 4 Office : (305)231-212 1 Fax : (305)231-212 2 By : 

# Q Michae lA . Pizzi , Jr. , Esq . CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E IHEREB YCERTIF Ythat Ihav eo nth e1s t

da y o f December , 2008 , serve dth eforegoin g Respons et o Motio nt o Dismis s an dRepl y Brie f o f Petitioner s o nth efollowin g persons at th e followin g addresse s b y FederalExpress , o r b y personaldelivery , andb y facsimil etransmission : Offic eo f th eChie f Counse l Attention : FA APart

1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t AGC-61 0 FederalAviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc eAvenu eS.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Hon . Carlo s Alvarez , Mayo r Miami-Dad eCounty Stephe nP . Clar

k Center 11 1 N . W . 1*

* Stree t ^ 29" ' Floo r Miami , FL3312 8 Davi dMurray , Esq . Count y Attorne y P.O . Bo x02550 4 Miami , FL33102-550 4 By : ^ Michae lA . Pizzi , Jr , Esq . Florid aBar . No , 07954 5

fe^ ^ f