alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 3 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 4 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 5 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 6 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 7 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 8 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 9 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 10 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 11 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 12 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 13 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 14 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 15 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 16 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 17 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 18 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 19 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 20 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 21 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 22 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 23 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 24 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 25 of 26
Case 5:09-cv-00534-TJC-JRK Document 46 Filed 04/05/10 Page 26 of 26
#### § 109.103 Requirements of the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974.

No self-propelled unit of more than 500 gross tons may embark on an international voyage unless it is issued the appropriate Convention certificate as described in §§ 107.401 through 107.413 of this subchapter.
Welcome 

Welcome to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife’s CD for the Proposed Land Exchange Yukon 

Flats National Wildlife Refuge Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

This CD is an interactive version of the Final EIS. For a quick overview, read Final EIS Summary or the 

abstract and executive summary in Volume 1 of the EIS. 

 

Viewing the Final EIS on CD, Paper, or the Web Site 

Whether you read the Final EIS on the CD, Web Site, or as a hardcopy, you will find that all formats 

contain the same information. However, the presentation on the CD and Web Site may differ slightly 

from what you see on the hardcopy version. 

 

In order to view the files on the CDs, you will need the most recent version of Adobe® Reader®, or 

another software program that can read PDF files. You can download the free software by clicking on 

this link to connect to the Adobe® Web site: http://get.adobe.com/reader/. 

Each section of the EIS is as separate files on the CD and Web Site. The files are as follows: 

Volume 1 

Final EIS Mission Statement 

Final EIS Dear Reader Letter 

Final EIS Abstract 

Final EIS Executive Summary 

Final EIS Acronyms 

Final EIS Table of Contents 

Final EIS Chapter 1 

Final EIS Chapter 2 

Final EIS Chapter 3 

Final EIS Chapter 4 

Final EIS Chapter 5 

Volume 2 

Final EIS Title Page 

Final EIS Table of Contents 

Final EIS References 

Final EIS Glossary 

Final EIS Index 

Final EIS Appendix A – Agreement in Principle 

Final EIS Appendix B – Scientific Species Names 

Final EIS Appendix C – ANILCA 810 

Final EIS Appendix D – Permits Table 

Final EIS Appendix E – Easements 

Final EIS Appendix F – Oil and Gas Assessment 

Final EIS Appendix G – Refuge Species 

Final EIS Appendix H – Business Licenses 

Final EIS Appendix I – Cultural History 

Final EIS Appendix J - Subsistence Harvests of Villages 

Final EIS Responses to Comments 

Links in the text will either: 

1) Open a new file for the referenced chapter, appendix, or map; or

2) Take you to the referenced section, table, or figure within each document. 
For More Information and to Submit Comments on the Final EIS 

Learn about the BLM and the project at http://yukonflatseis.ensr.com. Comments on the Final EIS can be 

submitted to the following: 

Laura Greffenius 

EIS Project Coordinator 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

1011 East Tudor Road, MS-231 

Anchorage, AK 99503 

907-786-3872 

yukonflats_planning@fws.gov 

The deadline for submitting comments is April 12, 2010.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Personnel and 
Readiness); DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in the Government Act of 
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150 and 160, the 
following meeting notice is announced:
    Name of Committee: Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the 
Military Services (hereafter referred to as the Task Force).
    Date: March 19, 2007 through March 21, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: Marshall Hall, National Defense University, Fort McNair, 
Washington, DC 20319-5066.
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of the administrative and 
preparatory working meeting is to: (a) Discuss administrative matters 
of the Task Force; (b) receive administrative information from the 
Department of Defense; and (c) receive background information from the 
Task Force staff, in preparation of the Task Force's first public 
meeting.
    The administrative working meeting will be held at Marshall Hall 
from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. on Monday, March 19, 2007. The preparatory 
working meetings will be held at Marshall Hall from (a) 1:30 p.m. to 5 
p.m. on Monday March 19, 2007; and (b) 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m., and 1:30 
p.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday and Wednesday March 20 and 21, 2007.
    Both the Administrative and Preparatory Work Meetings, pursuant to 
41 CFR 102-3.160, are closed to the public.
    In addition, the Committee Management Officer for the Department of 
Defense, pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150(b), waives the 15-calendar day 
notification requirement. The basis for this waiver is the recent 
selection of the Task Force members and the Agency's request that the 
Task Force immediately begin its work.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Shaka Thorne, U.S. Navy, 
Designated Federal Officer, Defense Task Fore on Sexual Assault in the 
Military Services, 2850 Eisenhower Ave, Suite 100, Alexandria, Virginia 
22314.
    Telephone: (703) 325-6640.
    Fax: (703) 325-6710/6711, DSN<greek-i> 221, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#295a41484248075d41465b474c695e5a46075e415a07444045"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94e7fcf5fff5bae0fcfbe6faf1d4e3e7fbbae3fce7baf9fdf8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 7, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-1164 Filed 3-8-07; 11:16 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 671.2 Scope.

These regulations in part 671 apply to any U.S. citizen's use or release of a banned substance, designated pollutant or waste in Antarctica.

[58 FR 34719, June 29, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 37438, July 22, 1994]
[No. 3650.]

#### Monte Vista Canal Co. et al. v. San Luis Valley Irrigated Land Co.

In an appeal from a decree authorizing an irrigating company to change the place of diversion of the waters to which it was entitled the respondents challenged the validity or sufficiency of a deed under which the petitioner claimed title to a certain ditch and water right. Neither of these were claimed by any of the appellants, and the title being in issue only incidentally, it was held that no freehold was thus involved. A motion to remand the cause was, as to its other features, ruled by the judgment in *Monte Vista Company v. Centennial Company,*ante, 364.

*Appeal from Costilla District Court.*Hon. Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.

Messrs. Corlett *&*Corlett, Messrs. Goudy & Twitchell, for appellants.

Mr. Jesse Stephenson, for appellee.

King, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Motion is made to remand this cause to the supreme court for the reason that the decision necessarily relates to or involves a freehold. The judgment appealed from was rendered by the district court in a statutory proceeding for permission to change the point of - diversion of decreed water-rights. So far as applicable to this motion, the facts and conditions are substantially the same as in case No. 3649, *The Monte Vista Canal Co. et al. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co.,*decided at this term, with the exception that in the present case appellants have challenged the validity or sufficiency of a deed by which appellee claims title to an irrigation ditch and a water right, conveyed or attempted *377to be conveyed to it by the town of Alamosa. This ditch or water right is not claimed by any of the appellants, and if the title thereto is in issue in this proceeding, it is only incidentally or collaterally so, and a freehold is not thereby *involved.*— Harvey *v. Travelers’ Ins., Co.,*18 Colo., 354. *McCandless v. Green,*20 Colo., 519. *Callbreath v. Hug,*48 Colo., 202. For the reasons more fully stated in *Monte Vista Canal Co. et al. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co., supra,*the motion herein to remand is denied.
§ 75.375 Effects of suspension and termination. Costs to the non-Federal entity resulting from obligations incurred by the non-Federal entity during a suspension or after termination of a Federal award or subaward are not allowable unless the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes them in the notice of suspension or termination or subsequently. However, costs during suspension or after termination are allowable if: ( a ) The costs result from obligations which were properly incurred by the non-Federal entity before the effective date of suspension or termination, are not in anticipation of it; and
( b ) The costs would be allowable if the Federal award was not suspended or expired normally at the end of the period of performance in which the termination takes effect.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  OF U.S.  LABORATORIES,  INC.  AS OF AND FOR THE  NINE  MONTHS  ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30,  1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2198044
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4019091
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (86246)
<INVENTORY>                                    478424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6799189
<PP&E>                                         1810862
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (986176)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9573018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2674841
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32000
<OTHER-SE>                                     6418273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9573018
<SALES>                                        11230000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11230000
<CGS>                                          5698711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10604921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (75767)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                642735
<INCOME-TAX>                                   257094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   385641
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13


</TABLE>
§ 400.220 Counting time-eligibility of refugees. A State may calculate the time-eligibility of a refugee under this part in either of the following ways: ( a ) On the basis of calendar months, in which case the month of arrival in the United States must count as the first month; or
( b ) On the basis of the actual date of arrival, in which case each month will be counted from that specific date.
[54 FR 5483, Feb. 3, 1989]
#### The Phoenix Bank, *Appellant, v.*Daniel P. Stafford and others, *Respondents*.

Motion granted by inserting in the order of reversal the words *“*on questions of fact,” on payment by plaintiff of ten dollars costs of opposing, and on condition that if the defendants elect within ten dajs to discontinue their appeal to the Court of Appeals (which they are hereby permitted to do, without costs, in case the plaintiff avails himself of the relief granted by this order) the plaintiff pay to the defendants their costs and disbursements incurred in the prosecution of said appeal to this time, and if said condition be not complied with the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs of opposing.
#### § 641.11 Policy.

It is the policy of NSF to use all practicable means, consistent with its authority, to ensure that potential environmental effects of actions undertaken by NSF in Antarctica, either independently or in cooperation with another country, are appropriately identified and considered during the decisionmaking process, and that appropriate environmental safeguards which would limit, mitigate or prevent adverse impacts on the Antarctic environment are identified.
EXHIBIT  32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Network Installation Corporation,
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Michael  A.  Novielli,  Chairman  and  Interim  CFO of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Michael  Novielli
--------------------------------------
Michael  Novielli
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
Dated:  July  12,  2004





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.
# Eiropas Savienības L 73/2011

| | ISSN 1725-5112
  doi:10.3000/17255112.L_2011.073.lav |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | L 73 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Tiesību akti | 54. sējums2011. gada 18. marts |

ISSN 1725-5112

doi:10.3000/17255112.L_2011.073.lav

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

L 73

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Tiesību akti

54. sējums2011. gada 18. marts

---

| Saturs | | II   Neleģislatīvi akti | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | STARPTAUTISKI NOLĪGUMI |
| | * | Informācija par dienu, kad stājas spēkā Partnerattiecību nolīgums zivsaimniecības nozarē starp Eiropas Savienību un Zālamana salām | 1 |

Saturs

II   Neleģislatīvi akti

Lappuse

STARPTAUTISKI NOLĪGUMI

*

Informācija par dienu, kad stājas spēkā Partnerattiecību nolīgums zivsaimniecības nozarē starp Eiropas Savienību un Zālamana salām

1

| LV | Tiesību akti, kuru virsraksti ir gaišajā drukā, attiecas uz kārtējiem jautājumiem lauksaimniecības jomā un parasti ir spēkā tikai ierobežotu laika posmu.
  Visu citu tiesību aktu virsraksti ir tumšajā drukā, un pirms tiem ir zvaigznīte. |
| --- | --- |

LV

Tiesību akti, kuru virsraksti ir gaišajā drukā, attiecas uz kārtējiem jautājumiem lauksaimniecības jomā un parasti ir spēkā tikai ierobežotu laika posmu.

Visu citu tiesību aktu virsraksti ir tumšajā drukā, un pirms tiem ir zvaigznīte.

---

II Neleģislatīvi akti

STARPTAUTISKI NOLĪGUMI

| 18.3.2011 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | L 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

L 73/1

---

Informācija par dienu, kad stājas spēkā Partnerattiecību nolīgums zivsaimniecības nozarē starp Eiropas Savienību un Zālamana salām

Eiropas Savienība 2010. gada 7. decembrī informēja Zālamana salas par to, ka Padome Eiropas Savienības vārdā ir pabeigusi procedūras, kas vajadzīgas, lai 2010. gada 21. oktobrī Briselē parakstītais minētais nolīgums stātos spēkā.

Tāpat arī Zālamana salas 2011. gada 9. martā informēja Eiropas Savienību par savu noslēgšanas procedūru pabeigšanu.

Nolīgums attiecīgi stājās spēkā 2011. gada 9. martā saskaņā ar tā 18. pantu.

---
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:12-cv-00143-RMC Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 18 of 18
----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|           DATE:  September 27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Marius Silvasan     |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                            |   | Marius Silvasan         |
|                                                                                            |   | Chief Executive Officer |
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1879 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and reemployment rights for certain individuals 

ordered to full-time National Guard duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1879 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Em3 ployment Protection Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS FOLLOWING CERTAIN NA5 TIONAL GUARD DUTY. 

6 (a) REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS.—Section 4312(c)(4) of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

9 (D); 

10 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub11 paragraph (E) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(F) ordered to full-time National Guard 

15 duty under the provisions of section 502(f) of 

16 title 32 when the period of duty is expressly 

17 designated in writing by the Secretary of De18 fense as covered by this subparagraph.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subparagraph (F) of section 

20 4312(c)(4) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 

21 subsection (a), shall apply with respect to an individual 

22 ordered to full-time National Guard duty under section 

23 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, on or after Sep24 tember 11, 2001, and shall entitle such individual to rights 
3 

•HR 1879 EH

1 and benefits under chapter 43 of title 38 of such Code 

2 on or after that date. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1879 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

Guard duty. tain individuals ordered to full-time National for employment and reemployment rights for cer-
#### W. *&*R. Leviston *v.*Hiram W. French.

It is within the power of the Court, by special order, to allow depositions,taken in another suit between the same parties, to be read at the hearing of a cause in equity.

In Equity.

*Marshall &*Chase, for plaintiffs.

*George, Foster & Sanborn,*for defendant.

Bartlett, J.

It is within the power of the court by special order to allow depositions, taken in another suit between the same parties, tobe read at the hearing of a cause in equity. 3 Greenl. Ev. secs. 326, 341; *Nevil v. Johnson,*2 Vernon 447; 2 Dan. Ch. Pr. 1011; 2 Chitt. Eq. Dig. 990. The subject matter of this cause is the same as that in a suit of law brought by French against TV. & E. Leviston, which is still pending. In that cause the present plaintiffs had taken the depositions of John Field, John Osborn and Hiram IV. French, and the present defendant had appeared at the caption. The plaintiffs now move for leave to use those depositions in this cause. The subject matter of the two causes is the same, the same claims are in question, the parties are the same, and the present defendant had full opportunity to cross examine the witnesses; and we think that under the circumstances the motion should be granted. The defendant may, if he desires, take the further depositions of these witnesses.
EXHIBIT 10.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No 333-110696, 333-100971 and 333-11650) of
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. of our report dated April 2, 2004, with
respect to the financial statements of Surf-Communications Solutions BV.
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31,
2003.



Amsterdam, February 28, 2005

                                                 /S/ MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN

                                                     MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN

F.D.N. Walta RA