alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 95 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 95

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``Hazardous and Solid Waste Management 
System: Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities; 
                   Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

  Mr. Mullin (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
 Cramer, Mr. Braun, Mr. Ricketts, Ms. Lummis, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Scott of 
    South Carolina, and Mr. Hoeven) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``Hazardous and Solid Waste Management 
System: Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities; 
                   Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal 
Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities; Legacy CCR Surface 
Impoundments'' (89 Fed. Reg. 38950 (May 8, 2024)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.15




WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


The annual retainer for all non-employee directors is $20,000.  Annual retainers for committee chairpersons are as follows: Chairman of the Board (if non-employee) -$20,000; Chair of the Audit Committee-$10,000; and Chair of the Compensation Committee-$10,000. Annual retainers for the members of committees are as follows: Member of the Audit Committee-$5,000; and Member of the Compensation Committee-$5,000.  There is not separate compensation for meeting attendance.  In addition, all directors may be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for service as directors.  In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the 2019 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. On a director’s initial appointment date, non-employee directors are each granted 2,500 restricted shares with an annual grant thereafter based on a target grant date value of $29,000 to be granted upon election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, with the award vesting on the first anniversary date of the grant.
§ 96.30 Fiscal and administrative requirements. ( a ) *Fiscal control and accounting procedures.* Except where otherwise required by Federal law or regulation, a State shall obligate and expend block grant funds in accordance with the laws and procedures applicable to the obligation and expenditure of its own funds. Fiscal control and accounting procedures must be sufficient to (a) permit preparation of reports required by the statute authorizing the block grant and (b) permit the tracing of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have not been used in violation of the restrictions and prohibitions of the statute authorizing the block grant.
( b ) *Financial summary of obligation and expenditure of block grant funds* — ( 1 ) *Block grants containing time limits on both the obligation and the expenditure of funds.* After the close of each statutory period for the obligation of block grant funds and after the close of each statutory period for the expenditure of block grant funds, each grantee shall report to the Department: ( i ) Total funds obligated and total funds expended by the grantee during the applicable statutory periods; and
( ii ) The date of the last obligation and the date of the last expenditure.
( 2 ) *Block grants containing time limits only on obligation of funds.* After the close of each statutory period for the obligation of block grant funds, each grantee shall report to the Department: ( i ) Total funds obligated by the grantee during the applicable statutory period; and
( ii ) The date of the last obligation.
( 3 ) *Block grants containing time limits only on expenditure of funds.* After the close of each statutory period for the expenditure of block grant funds, each grantee shall report to the Department: ( i ) Total funds expended by the grantee during the statutory period; and
( ii ) The date of the last expenditure.
( 4 ) *Submission of information.* Grantees shall submit the information required by paragraph (b)(1), (2), and (3) of this section on OMB Standard Form 269A, Financial Status Report (short form). Grantees are to provide the requested information within 90 days of the close of the applicable statutory grant periods.
[47 FR 29486, July 6, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 37966, Oct. 13, 1987; 53 FR 11656, Apr. 8, 1988; 64 FR 55857, Oct. 15, 1999]
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|                       |  |  |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 08-5223 September Term 2009

1:08-cv-00248-JR

Filed On: May 3, 2010

Speechnow.org, et al.,

Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

------------------------------

Consolidated with 09-5342

BEFORE: Sentelle, Chief Judge, and Ginsburg, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel,

Garland, Brown, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for immediate issuance of the

mandate, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted. The Clerk is directed to issue the

mandate forthwith. 

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

MaryAnne Lister 

Deputy Clerk

Case: 08-5223 Document: 1242965 Filed: 05/03/2010 Page: 1
#### § 81.58 Disposition of motions and petitions.

The reviewing authority or the presiding officer may not sustain or grant a written motion or petition prior to expiration of the time for filing responses thereto, but may overrule or deny such motion or petition without awaiting response: *Provided, however,* That prehearing conferences, hearings and decisions need not be delayed pending disposition of motions or petitions. Oral motions and petitions may be ruled on immediately. Motions and petitions submitted to the reviewing authority or the presiding officer, respectively, and not disposed of in separate rulings or in their respective decisions will be deemed denied. Oral arguments shall not be held or written motions or petitions unless the presiding officer in his discretion expressly so orders.
§ 1630.18 Applicability. This subpart applies when a recipient of LSC funds: ( a ) Ceases to exist as a legal entity, including merging or consolidating functions with another LSC recipient when the other recipient becomes the LSC recipient for the service area; or
( b ) Otherwise ceases to receive funds directly from LSC. This may include voluntary termination by the recipient or involuntary termination by LSC of the recipient's LSC grant, and may occur at the end of a grant term or during the grant term.
### Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under

EO12866/13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.
**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA): Final Rule**  **Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units** 
**RIN 2060**

**- AQ91** 

1. Reviewer recommends adding language that more fully describes the modification concept to ensure that it is grounded in equipment changes. For example, enumerate the major changes of equipment changes (e.g., boilers, turbines, controls) and define modifications as changes in one or more of these categories that results in emissions increases above the threshold. 2. Reviewer recommends considering apply ing a 10% threshold to any modification that addresses a single major equipment change category and a 15% threshold to any modification that combines multiple categories of modification. 3. Reviewer recommends providing additional discussion that ensur es that modifications cannot be triggered based on hourly emissions increases in a single exceptional hour or a handful of exceptional hours (versus an annua l average or similar metric). 4. Reviewer recommends limiting the definition of modifications to single projects that take place within a finite time period (e.g., a single outage). This would clarify the definition of modification and exclude ongoing multip hase enhancements.
§ 75.100 Purpose. ( a ) ( 1 ) This part establishes uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for Federal awards to non-Federal entities, as described in § 75.101. HHS awarding agencies must not impose additional or inconsistent requirements, except as provided in §§ 75.102 and 75.210, or unless specifically required by Federal statute, regulation, or Executive Order.
( 2 ) This part provides the basis for a systematic and periodic collection and uniform submission by Federal agencies of information on all Federal financial assistance programs to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It also establishes Federal policies related to the delivery of this information to the public, including through the use of electronic media. It prescribes the manner in which General Services Administration (GSA), OMB, and Federal agencies that administer Federal financial assistance programs are to carry out their statutory responsibilities under the Federal Program Information Act (31 U.S.C. 6101-6106).
( b ) *Administrative requirements.* Subparts B through D of this part set forth the uniform administrative requirements for grant and cooperative agreements, including the requirements for HHS awarding agency management of Federal grant programs before the Federal award has been made, and the requirements HHS awarding agencies may impose on non-Federal entities in the Federal award.
( c ) *Cost principles.* Subpart E of this part establishes principles for determining the allowable costs incurred by non-Federal entities under Federal awards. The principles are for the purpose of cost determination and are not intended to identify the circumstances or dictate the extent of Federal Government participation in the financing of a particular program or project. The principles are designed to provide that Federal awards bear their fair share of cost recognized under these principles except where restricted or prohibited by statute.
( d ) *Single audit requirements and audit follow-up.* Subpart F of this part is issued pursuant to the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507). It sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for the audit of non-Federal entities expending Federal awards. These provisions also provide the policies and procedures for HHS awarding agencies and pass-through entities when using the results of these audits.
( e ) For OMB guidance to Federal awarding agencies on Challenges and Prizes, please see M-10-11 Guidance on the Use of Challenges and Prizes to Promote Open Government, issued March 8, 2010, or its successor.
§ 81.104 Final decisions. ( a ) Where the hearing is conducted by a hearing examiner who makes an initial decision, if no exceptions thereto are filed within the 20-day period specified in § 81.103, such decision shall become the final decision of the Department, and shall constitute “final agency action” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 (formerly section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act), subject to the provisions of § 81.106.
( b ) Where the hearing is conducted by a hearing examiner who makes a recommended decision, or upon the filing of exceptions to a hearing examiner's initial decision, the reviewing authority shall review the recommended or initial decision and shall issue its own decision thereon, which shall become the final decision of the Department, and shall constitute “final agency action” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 (formerly section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act), subject to the provisions of § 81.106.
( c ) All final decisions shall be promptly served on all parties, and amici, if any.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Ronald E. Badke, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /S/ Ronald E. Badke
    --------------------------
    Ronald E. Badke
    Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
    March 15, 2007
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                                    |                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                    |
|                                 |                                                               |                                 |
| Dated: March                21, 2007 | By:                                                           | /s/ Richard                Domaleski |
|                                      | Richard                Domaleski                                   |
|                                      | Chief                  Executive Officer and                  President |
§ 261.15 Can a family be penalized if a parent refuses to work because he or she cannot find child care? ( a ) No, the State may not reduce or terminate assistance based on an individual's refusal to engage in required work if the individual is a single custodial parent caring for a child under age six who has a demonstrated inability to obtain needed child care, as specified at § 261.56.
( b ) A State that fails to comply with the penalty exception at section 407(e)(2) of the Act and the requirements at § 261.56 may be subject to the State penalty specified at § 261.57.
§ 5.26 How does HHS determine estimated completion dates for FOIA requests? ( a ) When we provide an estimated completion date, in accordance with § 5.24(f) and upon request, for the processing of records that do not require consultation with another agency, we estimate the completion date on the basis of our reasonable judgment as to how long it will take to complete the request. Given the uncertainty inherent in establishing any estimate, the estimated completion date is subject to change at any time.
( b ) When we provide an estimated completion date, in accordance with § 5.24(f) and upon request, for records that must be reviewed by another agency, our estimate may also be based on information from the other agency.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William E. Duke, Jr., hereby certify that,
      to
      the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of g8wave Holdings,
      Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of g8wave Holdings, Inc.





/s/
                William E. Duke, Jr.William
                E. Duke, Jr.Chief
                Financial OfficerMay
                12, 2008




This
      certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
      required by such Act, be deemed filed by g8wave Holdings, Inc. for purposes
      of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
      Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
      Act, except to the extent that the g8wave Holdings, Inc. specifically
      incorporates it by reference.
# CE2009286EN.01006101.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/61

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008Legal protection of computer programs (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0268

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 June 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of computer programs (codified version) (COM(2008)0023 — C6-0042/2008 — 2008/0019(COD))

2009/C 286 E/20

(Codecision procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0023),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0042/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0237/2008),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---