alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 900.105 Applicant responsibility. ( a ) Applicants shall work under Commission direction provided by the Approving Official, and assist the Commission in fulfilling its NEPA obligations by preparing NEPA analyses and documents that comply with the provisions of NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), the CEQ Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508), and the requirements set forth in this part.
( b ) Applicants shall follow Commission direction when they assist the Commission with the following responsibilities, among others: ( 1 ) Prepare and disseminate applicable environmental documentation concurrent with a proposal's engineering, planning, and design;
( 2 ) Create and distribute public notices;
( 3 ) Coordinate public hearings and meetings as required;
( 4 ) Submit all environmental documents created pursuant to this part to the Commission for review and approval before public distribution;
( 5 ) Participate in all Commission-conducted hearings or meetings;
( 6 ) Consult with the Commission prior to obtaining the services of an environmental consultant; in the case that an EIS is required, the consultant or contractor will be selected by the Commission; and
( 7 ) Implement mitigation measures included as voluntary commitments by the applicant or as requirements of the applicant in environmental documents.
EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
   Statements (Form S-4 No. 333-06443 and Form S-8 No. 333-12807) pertaining
   to (a) Superior Services, Inc.'s registration of 2,500,000 shares of its
   common stock and (b) the Superior Services, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive
   Plan, 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan and various other individual
   Employment, Stock Option and Stock Purchase Agreements of our report dated
   January 31, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
   and schedules of Superior Services, Inc. included in this Annual Report
   (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



   ERNST & YOUNG LLP

   Milwaukee, Wisconsin
   March 24, 1997
#### § 81.36 Certificate of service.

The original of every document filed and required to be served upon parties to a proceeding shall be endorsed with a certificate of service signed by the party making service or by his attorney or representative, stating that such service has been made, the date of service, and the manner of service, whether by mail or personal delivery.
#### John M. White and Thomas A. Phelan, *Respondents, v.*Furman Pearsall, *Appellant.*

.Order reversed. Order of arrest vacated, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
#### § 702.50 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains the regulations of the United States Commission on Civil Rights implementing sections (a)-(f) of 5 U.S.C. 552b, the “Government in the Sunshine Act.” They are adopted to further the principle that the public is entitled to the fullest practicable information regarding the decision-making processes of the Commission. They open meetings of the Commission to public observation except where the rights of individuals are involved or the ability of the Commission to carry out its responsibilities requires confidentiality.
EX-99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of A.M.S.
Marketing, Inc. for the quarter June 30, 2002, I, Alfred M. Schiffrin,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of A.M.S.
Marketing, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

        (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
        2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
        the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of A.M.S.
        Marketing, Inc.


                                          /s/ Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2002
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

April 10, 2014 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Ofllcer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law ^ p 

SUBJECT: 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Danita C. Alberico/^'^ 

Attorney 

Draft Final Audit Report on the Committee on Arrangements for the 2012 

Republican National Convention (LRA 947) 

ITie Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Report ("DFAR") on the 

Committee on Arrangements for the 2012 Republican National Convention. The DFAR contains 

two findings: (I) Net Outstanding Convention Expenses; and (2) Failure to Itemize Debts. We 

concur with the findings. If you have any questions, please contact Danita C. Alberico, the 

attomey assigned to this audit.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

          - 36 CFR Chapter I

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, 10), notice is hereby given of the sixth meeting of the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog Management at Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA).

# DATES:

The Committee will meet on Thursday, April 5, 2007, beginning at 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Ft. Mason Officers' Club, Building 1, Upper Fort Mason, San Francisco, CA. Written comments may be sent to: Superintendent, GGNRA, Ft. Mason, Bldg. 201, San Francisco, CA 94123, Attn: Negotiated Rulemaking.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Project information line at 415-561-4728, or go to the Web site at                         *www.parkplanning.nps.gov/​goga*                         and select                         *Negotiated Rulemaking for Dog Management at GGNRA.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Committee was established pursuant to the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990 (5 U.S.C. 561-570) to consider developing a special regulation for dog walking at GGNRA. Although the Committee may modify its agenda during the course of its work, the proposed agenda for this meeting is as follows: Introductions, approval of the meeting summary for the previous meeting, updates since the previous meeting, update on the concurrent NEPA process, report from the Technical Subcommittee on progress to date, next steps, public comment.

The Committee meeting is open to the public and opportunity will be provided for public comment during the meeting. To request a sign language interpreter, lease call the park TDD line (415) 556-2766, at lease a week in advance of the meeting. Please note that federal regulations prohibit pets in public buildings, with the exception of service animals.

Dated: March 2, 2007.

Bernard C. Fagan,

Acting Chief, Office of Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1371 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-FN-M
Exhibit 10.1


 


SERVICE PROPERTIES TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation
of the Trustees of Service Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification
at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:


 


		·	Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of
$75,000 for services as a Trustee. The annual fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.



 


		·	Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee
chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional
annual fee of $17,500, $12,500 and $12,500, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new committee chair is prorated for
the initial year.



 


		·	The Lead Independent Trustee receives an additional
annual cash retainer fee of $15,000 for serving in this role.



 


		·	Each Trustee receives a grant of 5,000 of the Company’s
common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or,
for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).



 


		·	The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for
travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their
attending certain continuing education programs.
Motion to affirm allowed January 21, 1919.

#### VAN TASSELL *v.*JEFFERSON COUNTY.

(177 Pac. 955.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Abstract and Brief — Affirmance.

1. Where appellant has not filed his abstract or brief within the time required by Supreme Court Rules 6 and 8 (89 Or. 712, 713, 173 Pac. viii), and there has been no extension granted or any exeuse offered for the failure, judgment will be affirmed on motion, as provided by Rule 16 (173 Pae. x).

From Jefferson: T. E. J. Duffy, Judge.

In Banc.

On motion to affirm judgment.

Allowed.

*Mr. Vine W. Pearce*and *Mr. Bert C. Boyles,*for the motion.

*Mr. Lewis H. Irving, contra.*

PEB CURIAM.

1. This is a motion by defendants to affirm the judgment because of failure of plaintiff to *601file Ms abstract and brief, as required by Eules 6 and 8 of this court.

Plaintiff filed Ms transcript on appeal on August 16, 1918. His time for filing an abstract expired September 5, 1918, and there has been no extension granted, nor is any excuse offered for failure to file the abstract and briefs as required by our rules.

Defendants move the court for an affirmance of the judgment, as provided in Eule 16, and it is so ordered, with costs against plaintiff. Affirmed on Motion.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-2121

_____________________________

WILLIE G. WESTBERRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Barbara K. Hobbs, Judge.

November 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, 

for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler and 

Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
#### § 106.110 Definitions.

*Aquaculture support operations* means activities that treat aquaculture fish for or protect aquaculture fish from disease, parasitic infestation, or other threats to their health.
§ 689.3 Actions. ( a ) Possible final actions listed in this paragraph (a) for guidance range from minimal restrictions (Group I) to the most severe and restrictive (Group III). They are not exhaustive and do not include possible criminal sanctions. ( 1 ) *Group I actions.* ( i ) Send a letter of reprimand to the individual or institution.
( ii ) Require as a condition of an award that for a specified period an individual or institution obtain special prior approval of particular activities from NSF.
( iii ) Require for a specified period that an institutional official other than those guilty of misconduct certify the accuracy of reports generated under an award or provide assurance of compliance with particular policies, regulations, guidelines, or special terms and conditions.
( 2 ) *Group II actions.* ( i ) Totally or partially suspend an active award, or restrict for a specified period designated activities or expenditures under an active award.
( ii ) Require for a specified period special reviews of all requests for funding from an affected individual or institution to ensure that steps have been taken to prevent repetition of the misconduct.
( iii ) Require a correction to the research record.
( 3 ) *Group III actions.* ( i ) Terminate an active award.
( ii ) Prohibit participation of an individual as an NSF reviewer, advisor, or consultant for a specified period.
( iii ) Debar or suspend an individual or institution from participation in Federal programs for a specified period after further proceedings under applicable regulations.
( b ) In deciding what final actions are appropriate when misconduct is found, NSF officials should consider: ( 1 ) How serious the misconduct was;
( 2 ) The degree to which the misconduct was knowing, intentional, or reckless;
( 3 ) Whether it was an isolated event or part of a pattern;
( 4 ) Whether it had a significant impact on the research record, research subjects, other researchers, institutions or the public welfare; and
( 5 ) Other relevant circumstances.
( c ) Interim actions may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Totally or partially suspending an existing award;
( 2 ) Suspending eligibility for Federal awards in accordance with debarment-and-suspension regulations;
( 3 ) Proscribing or restricting particular research activities, as, for example, to protect human or animal subjects;
( 4 ) Requiring special certifications, assurances, or other, administrative arrangements to ensure compliance with applicable regulations or terms of the award;
( 5 ) Requiring more prior approvals by NSF;
( 6 ) Deferring funding action on continuing grant increments;
( 7 ) Deferring a pending award;
( 8 ) Restricting or suspending participation as an NSF reviewer, advisor, or consultant.
( d ) For those cases governed by the debarment and suspension regulations, the standards of proof contained in the debarment and suspension regulations shall control. Otherwise, NSF will take no final action under this section without a finding of misconduct supported by a preponderance of the relevant evidence.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00349-CV

D.R. Horton - Texas, Ltd. and DRHI, 

Inc.

v.

Savannah Properties Associates, 

L.P.

§

§

§

§

From the 362nd District Court of 

Denton County (2012-40415-362)

November 7, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gardner

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellants D.R. Horton - Texas, Ltd. and DRHI, 

Inc., shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Anne Gardner
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofFirstar Exploration Corporation.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Linda Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 10thday of April, 2008.

LINDA SMITHLinda SmithChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                              SUBLEASE AMENDMENT
                              ------------------

     THIS SUBLEASE AMENDMENT entered into as of this 28th day of August, 2000,
by and between Stusser Electric Company, hereinafter referred to as "Sublessor"
and Briazz, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Sublessee" with respect to that
certain Sublease dated February 6, 1998, covering Premises commonly known as
3901 Seventh Avenue South, Seattle, Washington, ("Sublease") to which Sublease
Sublessor and Sublessee are parties. The premises are situated on that certain
parcel located in the city of Seattle, King County Washington and legally
described in Exhibit A of the lease agreement:
             ---------

                                  WITNESSETH:
                                  -----------

          WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Sublease;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following:
     (1)  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Paragraph 8 of the
          Sublease, Briazz, Inc. agrees to the installation of the security
          fence around the Stusser Electric parking lot at 660 S. Andover
          Street, Seattle, and the resulting limitation of Briazz, Inc.'s access
          through said parking lot to the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.,
          Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. There will be no holiday
          access.
     (2)  Following construction of said fence, Sublessor will grant Sublessee
          the exclusive use of eight parking spaces and a small picnic area on
          the north side of the new fence, as shown on Exhibit A, attached
          hereto and made a part hereof.

     EXCEPT as hereinabove amended, the parties hereto reaffirm the terms and
conditions of the above mentioned Sublease.

     WITNESS the due execution hereof the hereinbelow signed dates.

SUBLESSEE:                              SUBLESSOR:

Briazz, Inc.                            Stusser Electric Company


By:/s/ Victor Alhadeff                  By:/s/ John D. Parish, Treasurer
   ----------------------------            --------------------------------


By:/s/ Bill Vivian                      By:/s/ [illegible], Asst. Secretary
   ----------------------------            --------------------------------

Dated:8/31/00                           Dated:9/8/00
      -------------------------               -----------------------------
<PAGE>

                   "MAP OF STUSSER ELECTRIC FENCE PROPOSAL"
§ 9.3 Delegations of authority. ( a ) The heads of operating agencies are delegated authority for negotiations and decisions as to the use of Department facilities by qualified academic scientists, engineers, and students.
( b ) The heads of operating agencies may (and are encouraged to) redelegate to the heads of their respective component organizations, with the power to further redelegate to laboratory directors, the authority for negotiations and decisions as to the use of departmental facilities. Appropriate use shall be made of advisory groups in formulating their decisions.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2411

MOHSEN KHORDEHFOROSH , Party

- in

- Interest

- Appellant , and MOE’S RX CLINIC, INC. , Debtor ,

v. ANNA COTTON WRIGHT , Trustee

- Appellee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:17

- cv
- 00628

- GCM )

Submitted : May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Mohsen Khordehforosh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mohsen Khordehforosh appeals from the district court ’ s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the Chapter 7 bankruptcy case filed by Moe’s Rx Clinic, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for t he reasons stated by the district court

. Khordehforosh v. Wright , No. 3:17

- cv
- 00 6 28

- GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2017). We deny Khordenforosh’s pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argu ment would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 85

#### Editorial Note:

At the request of the Department of Health and Human Services, the “Section-by-Section Analysis” portion of the preamble of the document published at 53 FR 25595, July 8, 1988, as corrected at 53 FR 26559, July 13, 1988, appears at the end of part 85.

#### §§ 85.32-85.40 [Reserved]
#### § 641.20 Notification of the availability of environmental documents and other information.

The Environmental Officer, Office of Polar Programs, shall make Environmental Action Memoranda, environmental documents and final data obtained under § 641.21, available to the public upon request. However, notice of such availability need not be given, except as specifically provided in this part.

[57 FR 40339, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 37438, July 22, 1994]
# Senate Floor Activity - Monday, March 3, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.