alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### SALVATORE SICA, PETITIONER, v. BETZ BROTHERS, RESPONDENT.

*670A petition having been filed on or about the 13th day of March, 1928, by the above-named petitioner, Salvatore Sica, praying for a determination of his rights to workmen’s compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation act, approved April 4th, 1911, and acts supplemental thereto, and the respondent, Betz Brothers, having filed an answer to the said petition and said case having been duly noticed for hearing and come on for a hearing before Deputy Commissioner Charles E. Corbin, and at the hearing of said petition the respondent having contended that the petition should be disallowed because the petitioner failed to prove such physical distress that the attendance of a licensed physician was required within twenty-four hours after the occurrence of the alleged accident, and the petitioner having testified at the hearing held July 27th, 1928, in his own favor, giving testimony attempting to establish the fact that he sustained a traumatic hernia while performing work in the course of his employment by the respondent herein, and the respondent having produced no witnesses to deny the facts set forth and testified to by the petitioner, and after hearing argument bjr counsel for the petitioner and respondent upon the law applicable to the case and all parties having been present at the authorized hearing or having been properly represented by counsel.

Now, after due deliberation, I am forced to conclude that the petitioner has failed to establish that he sustained a traumatic hernia arising out of and in the course of his employment and that he failed to establish that he suffered such physical distress at the time of the alleged accident that the attendance of a licensed physician was required within twenty-four hours after the occurrence of the hernia.

iji ífc >!« s£ #

Charles E. Corbih, *Deputy Commissioner.*
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As
Adopted Pursuant to





Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael L. Wynhoff, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      May 20, 2010
            /s/
      Michael L. WynhoffMichael
      L. WynhoffChief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 674.3 Definitions.

In this part:

*Antarctica* means the area south of 60 degrees south latitude.

*Expedition* means an activity undertaken by one or more persons organized within or proceeding from the United States to or within Antarctica for which advance notification is required under Paragraph 5 of Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty.

*Incremental cost* is the extra cost involved in sharing the samples with other researchers. It does not include the initial cost of collecting the meteorites in Antarctica or the cost of maintaining the samples in a curatorial facility.

*Person* has the meaning given that term in section 1 of title 1, United States Code, and includes any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 USC. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Information Services Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Martell, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 12, 2009

/s/ FRANK MARTELLFrank Martell Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18 - 225 9

MONIKA AHMADPOUR

- BAHNAMIRI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE , Defendant

- Appellee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 00701

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Monika Ahmadpour

- Bahnamiri , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Monika Ahmadpour

- Bahnamiri appeals the district cou rt’s order dismissing with prejudice her amended complaint filed pursuant to Title V II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018)

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ahmadpour

- Bahnamiri v. U .S. Postal Serv

. , No. 1:18

- cv - 00701

- LMB

- TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
#### Chapman Slate Company v. Sutcliffe.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought against Eli Sutcliffe to recover for slate alleged to be sold and delivered.

*Shaw & Jeroloman,*for appellant.

*O. D. M. Baker,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The opinion is devoted to the consideration of matters of fact.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 411.62 Protection duties.

If a care provider facility employee, volunteer, or contractor reasonably believes that a UC is subject to substantial risk of imminent sexual abuse or sexual harassment, he or she must take immediate action to protect the UC.
§ 11.518 Service requirements for national endorsement as chief engineer (limited) of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for endorsement as chief engineer (limited) of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels is 5 years of total service in the engineroom of vessels. Two years of this service must have been as an engineer officer while holding an engineer officer endorsement. Thirty months of the service must have been as a qualified member of the engine department or equivalent position.
( b ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.325 and 11.331 of this part.
kBke
Press Office
1325 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463.
Phone: Local 523-4065 Toll Free 800-424-9530

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JUNE 25, 1982
GOP COMMITTEES LEAD IN FUNDRAISING

WASHINGTON -- Republican national party committees raised nine times as much as.
their Democratic counterparts during the first fifteen months of the 1982 election
cycle according to information on file with the Federal Election Commission.
Republicans also outspent Democrats by more than seven-to-one.

‘he financial information was filed by the following national committees:

Republican National Committee (RNC)

National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC)

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (pscc)
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)

Adjustments have been made for transfers between these cammittees. The financial
status of other national, state and local party committees is not yet available.

The Republicans began the fifteen-month period January 1, 1981, with
$5.5 million cash-on-hand. The Democrats had, at that time, almost $600,000.

Throughout the period, the Republicans raised approximately $120 million,
spent $91 million, had a cash reserve of $34 million as of March 31, 1982, and owed
approximately $600,000.

In contrast, the Democrats both raised and spent $13 million during the
same fifteen-month period, ending with slightly less than $1 million in cash-on-
hand at the beginning of April and owing $2.3 million.

The best information available is through March 31, 1982, due to
the differing filing patterns of the six committees.

The two national party committees and the. “Senate and House cammittees
compare as follows (figures are approximate and in millions of dollars):

Committee Receipts Disbursements Cash-on-Hand

RNC $ 54.0 $ 45.3 $ 10.2
. 8.8 6

DNC .
NRSC (Senatorial) 26. 21.3 5.2
" . 1.3 22

pscc
NRCC (House) 39. 24.7 18.0
pecc " . 2.7 +2

According to reports on file at the FEC, few contributions have been
made to federal candidates in the non-election year and Spring of 1982, by these
six committees. Limited coordinated expenditures were made in conjunction with
special elections held in 1981 and payment of debts for 1980 Presidential campaigns.
Additional information on the financial activity of the 53 natioy
committees will be provided as available after the parties file ir second quarter

reports for 1982.
-30-
§ 400.203 Federal funding for cash assistance. ( a ) To the extent that sufficient funds are appropriated, Federal funding is available for cash assistance provided to eligible refugees during the 36-month period beginning with the first month the refugee entered the United States, as follows— ( 1 ) If a refugee is eligible for TANF, adult assistance programs, or foster care maintenance payments under title IV-E of the Social Security Act, FF is available only for the non-Federal share of such assistance.
( 2 ) If a refugee is eligible for SSI, FF is available for any supplementary payment a State may provide under that program.
( b ) Federal funding is available for refugees cash assistance (RCA) provided to eligible refugees during a period of time to be determined by the Director in accordance with § 400.211.
( c ) To the extent that sufficient funds are appropriated, Federal funding is available for general assistance (GA) provided to eligible refugees during the 24-month period beginning with the 13th month after the refugee entered the United States.
[51 FR 3916, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 32224, Aug. 24, 1988; 58 FR 46090, Sept. 1, 1993; 58 FR 64507, Dec. 8, 1993; 60 FR 33604, June 28, 1995; 65 FR 15450, Mar. 22, 2000]
Submitted on record and briefs April 25,

reversed and remanded for new trial May 29,1996

#### In the Matter of Gerald Weyeneth, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*GERALD WEYENETH, *Appellant.*

(9511-73201; CA A91193)

917 P2d 75

Thomas A. Coleman filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*397PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals a judgment of civil commitment. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court did not fully advise him of his statutory rights under ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we agree. *State v. Tardanico,*132 Or App 230, 888 P2d 15 (1994); *State u.*Allison, 129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994).

Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# SUMMARY:

The Southwest Oregon Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, April 10, and Wednesday, April 11, 2007, in Medford, Oregon. The purpose of the meeting is to advise the Bureau of Land Management on the current Western Oregon Plan Revision currently taking place. The meeting will be held at the Medford BLM Office, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, Oregon, in Rooms A and B. The meeting is from 1 to 5 p.m. pm April 10 and 8 a.m. to noon on April 11. Written comments may be submitted prior to the meeting and delivered to Designated Federal Official, Cliff Dils at the Umpqua National Forest, 2900 NW., Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, OR 97470.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Umpqua National Forest Public Affairs Officer Cheryl Walters at 541-957-3270 or                         *crwalters@fs.fed.us*                         or 2900 NW., Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, OR 97470.                    

Dated: March 13, 2007.

Greg Lesch, 

Acting Forest Supervisor, Umpqua National Forest.

[FR Doc. 07-1335  Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### In the Matter of Charlotte A. Pepoon.

Decree affirmed, witb costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
- 81070160848
- 81070160849
- 81070160850
- 81070160851
- 81070160852
- 81070160853
- 81070160854
- 81070160855
#### § 50.8 Compliance.

If an alien physician acquires H-1B nonimmigrant status following approval by the INS of a request for waiver, then he or she becomes subject not only to the terms and conditions of the waiver, but also the terms and conditions of the H-1B nonimmigrant status. Failure to comply with those conditions will make that physician subject to removal from the United States by the INS.

[67 FR 77697, Dec. 19, 2002]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               71,941
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          19,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      6,753
<PP&E>                                              367,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (40,228)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      426,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                39,749
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                          5,662,763
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,276,220)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        426,292
<SALES>                                             200,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    200,256
<CGS>                                               103,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       103,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    684,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (587,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (587,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.10)



</TABLE>
RECEIVED oPPT CaIC 

1012 DEC 18 !IMiI I : 19 

December 17, 2012 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

ATTN: 40 CFR 799 .5089 ; 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

LANXESS Corporation Study Submission 

for CAS# 98-09-9 

Dear DCO Officer: 40130000018 

Enclosed is the second of several tests LANXESS Corporation will be 

submitting in compliance with the test rule for CAS# 98-09-9 

(benzenesulfonyl chloride). 

Study Name: Benzenesulfonyl chloride: Chromosome Aberration Test in 

Human Lymphoctyes In Vitro. (Project # 41201582) 

We have enclosed one hard copy version of the study and the robust 

summary and have included one CD containing an electronic version 

of both the study and the robust summary. 

Should you have any questions, please contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah A. Vercek 

Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 

Deborah Vercek 

Regulatory Affairs 

111 Park West Drive 

Pittsburgh, PA 15272-1112 

Phone 412-809-3709 

Fax: 412-809-1056 

Deborah.Vercek@lanxess.com 

www.US.I-ANXESS .com 

IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII I III IIII 

CONTAINS NO CBI 

LANXESS 

Energizing Chemistry
- 2358
- 2359
# EUR-Lex - 52008DC0301 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52008DC0301

**Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the results of the negotiations concerning cohesion policy strategies and programmes for the programming period 2007-2013 /* COM/2008/0301 final */ **

*

*

ANNEXES

Annex 1: Financial allocation per Objective and Fund in the programming period 2007-2013

[pic]

Amounts are in current prices.

[pic]

Annex 2.b: Cohesion Policy 2007-2013: 2007-2013: Breakdown of funds per category of intervention *

[pic][pic]

[pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] Source: SFC2007; as of 21 April 2008 * Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006, Annex 2, Categorisation of Funds Assistance for 2007-2013 |
SANDLER, REIFF, YOUNG & LAMB, P.C. 

September 3, 2013 

Mr. Thomas Hintermeister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20463 

Dear Mr. Hintermeister: 

This letter will serve as the response of the Democratic Party of South Carolina ("DPSC") 

to the Interim Audit Report ("lAR") of the Federal Election Commission's Audit Division ("the 

Audit Division") for the period covering the DPSC's financial activities for 2009 and 2010. 

Finding #1 

The first lAR finding involves recordkeeping for party payroll for employees who are paid 

all or in-part with non-federal funds. The DPSC has implemented procedures to ensure that it will 

maintain monthly logs to track employee time spent on federal activities and federal election 

activities for those employees who are paid all or in-part witli non-federal funds. 

Finding #2 

The second I AR finding involved a potential fmding that the DPSC had exceeded its 

spending authority in a House of Representatives election. Based upon documentation provided by 

the DPSC to the Audit Division, both the DPSC and the Audit Division agreed that the DPSC 

should amend its reports to move an incorrectly reported expenditure to Line 30(b). Both the 

DPSC and Audit Division agreed that this action, as well as the documentation provided to the 

Commission by the DPSC, remedied this issue and that the DPSC had not exceeded the coordinated 

expenditure limits. The DPSC has no additional comments at this time. 

If you require any further information, or have any other questions, please call me at (202) 

479-1111. 

Neil Reiff 

Counsel to the Democratic Party of South 

Carolina 

1025 VERMONT AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 300 • WASHINGTON, DC 20005 • TEL: (202) 479-1111 • FAX: (202) 479-1115
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 242
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 2 of 9 Pg ID 243
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 3 of 9 Pg ID 244
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 4 of 9 Pg ID 245
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 5 of 9 Pg ID 246
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 6 of 9 Pg ID 247
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 7 of 9 Pg ID 248
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 8 of 9 Pg ID 249
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 18-2 Filed 03/03/15 Pg 9 of 9 Pg ID 250
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
RICHARD SOKOLOWSKI, Chief Financial Officer of NEXT 1 INTERACTIVE, INC. (the
“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(i) The
Company’s accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February
28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ RICHARD SOKOLOWSKIRICHARD
      SOKOLOWSKIChief
      Financial OfficerDated:
      October 2, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

———————————––––––––––––x

IN RE:

CMS ENERGY SECURITIES

LITIGATION

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 02-CV-72004-DT

District Judge George Caram Steeh

Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan

————————————––––––––––––x

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REOPEN DEPOSITIONS OF

DEFENDANTS MCCORMICK AND WHIPPLE

WHEREAS Plaintiffs, by motion dated March 30, 2006 (the “Motion”), have

moved for an Order compelling each of defendant William McCormick and Kenneth

Whipple to appear for a deposition of not more than three hours, to answer questions

concerning documents produced subsequent to his prior deposition;

WHEREAS the District Court entered an Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(A) referring the Motion to United States Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan

for hearing and decision;

WHEREAS Magistrate Judge Morgan issued an Order dated April 10, 2006, that,

among other things, scheduled a hearing on the Motion for May 10, 2006; 

WHEREAS the parties have resolved the Motion, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Motion is hereby deemed withdrawn, 

2. The May 10, 2006 hearing on the Motion is cancelled, and

3. Each party shall bears its own costs.

Dated: April 25, 2006 s/Virginia M. Morgan 

Hon. Virginia M. Morgan

United States Magistrate Judge

2:02-cv-72004-GCS-VMM Doc # 364 Filed 04/25/06 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 5922