alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 63.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Applicability.* Except to the extent inconsistent with an applicable Federal statute the regulations in this part apply to all grant awards of Federal assistance made by the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation or his designee, hereinafter referred to in this part as the Assistant Secretary. Such grants include those under section 232 of the Community Services Act (42 U.S.C. 2835), section 1110 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1310), section 392A of the Communications Act of 1934, and such other authority as may be delegated to the Assistant Secretary for policy research activities.
( b ) *Exceptions to applicability.* The award and administration of contracts and cooperative agreements by the Assistant Secretary shall not be covered by this subchapter. Contracts entered into by the Assistant Secretary shall be subject to the regulations in CFR Title 48, Chapter 3. Generally, the Assistant Secretary will select between grant and contract procedures and instruments, both with regard to the solicitation process and with respect to unsolicited proposals, on the basis of criteria set forth in the proposed revision of 45 CFR 75.201(a) published at 39 FR 27469 at any subsequent revision thereof.
( c ) *Objectives* — ( 1 ) *Policy research.* The overall objective of policy research activities is to obtain information, as it relates to the mission of the Department of Health and Human Services, about the basic causes of and methods for preventing and eliminating poverty and dependency and about improved methods for delivering human resources services. Such information is obtained through the conduct of basic and applied research, statistical analyses, and demonstrations and evaluations which have demonstrated a high probability of impacting on the formulation or modification of major Departmental policies and programs.
( 2 ) *Telecommunications demonstrations.* The overall objective of the Telecommunications Demonstration Program is to promote the development of nonbroadcast telecommunications facilities and services for the transmission, distribution, and delivery of health, education, and social service information.
[40 FR 23295, May 29, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 36149, July 13, 1977; 85 FR 72911, Nov. 16, 2020]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2003


The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business, Inc. ("Issuer")
for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

     a).  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b).  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

     This Certification is executed as of August 11, 2003.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



                                                      /s/ Henry M. Baroco
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Henry M. Baroco
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                       29
150°0'0"W

150°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

61°0'0"N

61°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

Figure 4. Alternative A

Current Management Categories

Produced in the Division of Realty

and Natural Resources

Anchorage, Alaska

Current to: February 28, 2008

Kenai

NWR

Anchorage

Map

Extent

0 3.75 7.5 15

Miles

08-0038 JGB

Note: This map does not address ownership of navigable waters.

0 5 10 20

Kilometers

C o o k

I n l e t

B a y

K a c h e m a k

Seldovia

Homer

Kenai

Soldotna

Sterling

Cooper

Landing

Seward

Ninilchik

Salamatof

Hope

Tyonek T u r n a g a i n A r m

Chickaloon Bay

Tustumena Lake

Skilak Lake

Gulf of Alaska

Intensive

Moderate

Traditional

Minimal

Wilderness

State/Private

Refuge Boundary

54,500

179,000

189,000

196,000

1,319,500

50,000

2.7%

9.1%

9.6 %

9.7%

66.4%

2.5%

Area Acreage Percentage
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
Exhibit 27
Financial Data Schedule
"This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from December 31, 1996 10KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                            196,318
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       17,848,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  197,818
<PP&E>                            46,437
<DEPRECIATION>                         (553,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         17,539,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             115,235
<BONDS>                           16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       1,212
<COMMON>                          46,099
<OTHER-SE>                        17,360,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      17,539,277
<SALES>                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  75,000
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     318,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (243,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (243,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      (243,086)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .005
        

</TABLE>
Ely

Lund

Hiko

Baker

Alamo

McGill

Panaca

Pioche

Caliente

Cherry

Creek

Lincoln

County

White Pine

County

Nye

County

6

93

50

6

93

50

93

892

379

893

322

489

894

320

486

86 321

44

319

93

318

318

320

375

317

487

2

0 100 200

Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land 

Management as to the accuracy, reliability,

or completeness of these data for individual

or aggregate use with other data. Original 

data were compiled from various sources.

This information may not meet National Map 

Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and may 

be updated without notification.

Ely RMP/EIS

Elk Range

Map 2.4.6-1

0 1 8 6

Miles

Regional View

Legend

Cities and towns

Roads

County boundary

Elk crucial summer habitat

Elk habitat
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment to Consulting Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of June 4, 2020, is entered into by and
between Guardion Health Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and David W. Evans (“Consultant”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
Consultant and the Company are parties to that certain Consulting Agreement, dated September 29, 2017 (as amended, the “Consulting
Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, Consultant serves as the Chief Science Officer and as a member of
the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”);


 


WHEREAS,
the Company desires to appoint Consultant as interim President and interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS,
Consultant and the Company desire to amend the Consulting Agreement to reflect Consultant’s new position at the Company.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Appointment as Interim President and Interim CEO. As of June 12, 2020 or such other date as determined by the Board, Consultant
shall be appointed as interim President and interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company.


 


2.
Additional Compensation. Commencing June 12, 2020, in addition to the compensation described in Section 2 of the Consulting
Agreement, the Company shall pay Consultant (subject to applicable withholding) Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) per month for each
month that Consultant remains interim President and interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Amounts paid to Consultant
pursuant to this Section shall be paid in the same manner as compensation paid to Consultant under the Consulting Agreement, and
shall be prorated for any partial months of service in these roles.


 


3.
Miscellaneous.


 


(a)
Except as expressly modified hereby, the Consulting Agreement remains in full force and effect. Upon the execution and delivery
hereof, this Amendment and the Consulting Agreement shall be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument.


 


(b)
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which, including those received via facsimile transmission
or email (including in PDF format), shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


(c)
This Amendment and the Consulting Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State
of California without regard to its conflict of law principals.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	-1-



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Consulting Agreement to be executed as of the date first written
above.


 


	 	“COMPANY”
	 	 
	 	Guardion
    Health Sciences, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Robert Weingarten
	 	Name:	Robert
    Weingarten
	 	Title:	Secretary
    
	 	 	 
	 	“CONSULTANT”
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/
    David W. Evans
	 	 	David
    W. Evans


 





[Signature
Page to Amendment to Consulting Agreement]
EX-34 (g)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that
management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included
in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those
issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables
portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions
(the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC
has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable
to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and
securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited
to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129862 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ANNA PAOLINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129862 COA: 262461 Wayne CC: 03-315477-NO KMART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2006

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development  Special Emphasis Panel, January 5, 2007, 2 p.m. to March 9, 2007, 4 p.m. National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd., 5th Floor Conference Room, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 1, 2007, 72 FR 5983.                 

The meeting will be held March 19, 2007 from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. The location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: March 5, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1116  Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EX-35 (h)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-0A1

Per Section 13.01 of the Master Servicing and Trust Agreement, dated as of
8/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(i)     A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision.

(ii)    To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.

(iii)   Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
        extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements,
        certifications or assertions herein are subject to the following):
        instances of noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the
        applicable reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.

Certified By:
/s/Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary

(page)

Schedule A

Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors

During the reporting period, certain errors were made in connection with the
calculation of payments/distributions on the securities. To the best of the
signing officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been
material, has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has
been disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the
reporting period.
#### § 702.2 Authorization for hearing.

Under 42 U.S.C. 1975a(e)(1) the Commission or, on the authorization of the Commission, any subcommittee of two or more members, at least one of whom shall be of each major political party, may, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Act, hold such hearings and act at such times and locations as the Commission or such authorized subcommittee may deem advisable. The holding of hearings by the Commission or the appointment of a subcommittee to hold hearings pursuant to this section must be approved by a majority of the Commission or by a majority of the members present at a meeting at which at least a quorum of five members is present.
#### Herman Isaacs, Appellant, *v.*The Commercial Company or Salonica, Limited, Respondent

*Isaacs*v. *Commercial Co. of Salónica,*.127 App. Div. 915, affirmed.

(Argued October 22, 1909;

decided November 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 9, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for services and for money alleged to have been expended on behalf of defendant.

*Maxwell O. Katz*and *Otto 0. Sommerich*for appellant.

*William H. Fain*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
#### §§ 606.4-606.9 [Reserved]
#### § 109.334 Working over water.

The master or person in charge shall insure that each person working over the water is wearing a life preserver or a buoyant work vest.
- 2974
- 2975
- 2976
- 2977
- 2978
#### Bragg *et al. v.*The State.

Submitted June 18,

Decided August 13, 1906.

Indictment for unlawful sale of liquor. Before Judge Over-street. City court of Sylvania. April -7, 1906.

*W. H. Bragg*and *Lawson Bragg,*for plaintiffs in error.

*H. A. BoyJcin, solicitor,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. All the questions of law involved in this ease are controlled by the decision in the case of *Sowell*v. *State,*126 *Ga.*105.

2. While there was sufficient evidence in the case to support a finding that the defendants were guilty of an illegal sale within the statute of limitations, the evidence did not sufficiently show whether the date of the sale was prior to the finding of the indictment or subsequent thereto, and a new trial must be granted.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Wish, O. J., absent.*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1837 

To amend the Andean Trade Preference Act to add Paraguay to the list 

of countries that are eligible to be designated as beneficiary countries 

and ATPDEA beneficiary countries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2009 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. BERMAN, and Mr. 

WEXLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Andean Trade Preference Act to add Paraguay to the list of countries that are eligible to be 

designated as beneficiary countries and ATPDEA beneficiary countries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S.-Paraguay Part5 nership Act of 2009’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1837 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO ANDEAN TRADE PREFERENCE 

2 ACT. 

3 (a) ADDITION OF PARAGUAY TO LIST OF ELIGIBLE

4 COUNTRIES.—Section 203(b)(1) of the Andean Trade 

5 Preference Act (19 U.S.C. 3202(b)(1)) is amended by in6 serting after ‘‘Colombia’’ the following: 

7 ‘‘Paraguay’’. 

8 (b) TERMINATION OF DUTY-FREE TREATMENT.— 

9 Section 208(a)(1) of such Act (19 U.S.C. 3206(a)(1)) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘or Peru’’ and inserting ‘‘, Paraguay, 

11 or Peru’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 13

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
                               UNDER 18 U.S.C 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of VocalTec Communications
Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify that:

A) The Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

B) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.


                                                       /s/ Joseph Albagli
                                                       ------------------
                                                       Joseph Albagli
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                                       /s/ Eli Gendler
                                                       ---------------
                                                       Eli Gendler
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 15, 2008