alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SE’BRYNE O. WALTHALL,

Petitioner, Civil Action No. 2:14-CV-13510

v. HONORABLE MAUREEN O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

KENNETH MCKEE,

Respondent,

/

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TRANSFER THE

PETITION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PROBABLE CAUSE [Dkt. # 11] TO THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

On October 27, 2014, this Court dismissed petitioner’s habeas application

for being duplicative to a habeas case pending before Judge Judith E. Levy and

denied petitioner a certificate of appealability or leave to appeal in forma

pauperis. See Walthall v. McKee, No. 2:14-CV-13510 (E.D. Mich. October 27,

2014). On December 3, 2014, the Court again denied petitioner a certificate of

appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Petitioner has filed a petition for a certificate of probable cause, which this

Court construes as a motion for a certificate of appealability 1

 The heading on

petitioner’s motion, however, is addressed to the United States Court of Appeals

for the Sixth Circuit.

1 See Hill v. Johnson, 114 F. 3d 78, 81 (5th Cir. 1997).

1

2:14-cv-13510-MOB-MJH Doc # 15 Filed 03/09/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 178
The proper procedure when a district court denies a certificate of

appealability is for the petitioner to file a motion for a certificate of appealability

before the appellate court in the appeal from the judgment denying the petition for

writ of habeas corpus or the motion to vacate sentence. See Sims v. U.S., 244 F.

3d 509 (6th Cir. 2001)(citing Fed. R.App. P. 22(b)(1)). Petitioner has apparently

done so in this case, although he has filed his motion with the district court, rather

than the Sixth Circuit.

The Court will therefore order that the Clerk of the Court to transfer

Petitioner’s Petition for a Certificate of Probable Cause [Dkt. # 11] to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. 

Date: March 9, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their

respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on March 9, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-13510-MOB-MJH Doc # 15 Filed 03/09/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 179
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney Principal PLUS Futures Fund
L.P. II (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, David J. Vogel, President of Smith Barney Futures Management LLC,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.


/s/ David J. Vogel
    David J. Vogel
    Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
    Chief Executive Officer
    March 27, 2003
#### EMIL F. P. DOST AND EMMA DOST, PLAINTIFFS, v. ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Argued October 2, 1928

Decided March 28, 1929.

Before Gummeke, Chief Justice, and Justice Paekbk.

Por the plaintiffs, *Albert S. Woodruff.*

Por the defendant, *French, Richards & Bradley.*

Pee Cueiam.

This is a railroad crossing' case in which there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

*327The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and were in an automobile early in the morning proceeding to the place where the husband worked. The route lay across the railroad tracks of the defendant, and both husband and wife were entirely familiar with the crossing. They were equally familiar with the train schedule and knew that a train was due at that time. The automobile was struck by that particular train which was slowing up for the local station.

We need not consider the contradictory testimony bearing on the question whether either of the statutory signals was given, as we are clear that both plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence. The locality is perfectly level, the railroad track was on the grade of the surrounding land and the train, which was not moving fast, was in plain sight for fully a quarter of a mile. There was only one railroad track. It is claimed by the plaintiffs that they were prevented from seeing the train because of the intervention of a low bank of earth bordering the railroad track which was about three feet high and on which grew grass and weeds for perhaps one and one-half feet in addition. This bank directly adjoined the railroad track so that it is conceivable that one sitting in an automobile which is on the point of entering on the track may for a moment lose sight of an approaching train. But on the other hand, as demonstrated by the photographs, the train is plainly visible at any point up to say within ten feet or so of the track itself. In our estimation the failure of the plaintiffs or either of them to see this train under the circumstances, it being broad daylight and the weather being clear, speaks conclusively of contributory negligence, and this view we think is borne out by such eases as *Fisher*v. *West Jersey Railroad,*2 *N. J. Mis. R.*1161; *Stryker*v. *Pennsylvania Railroad,*6 *N. J. Adv. R.*567, and *Dourte & Irelan*v. *Pennsylvania Railroad Co.,*6 *N. J. Mis. R.*659.

The rule to show cause will be made absolute.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Commission on Digestive Diseases.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Commission on Digestive Diseases.
    Date: June 18-19, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: Introductions; updates from Working Groups; Commission 
timeline and next steps; and general discussion. Pre-registration is 
required. Instructions will be available on the Commission's Web 
site at http://NCDD.niddk.nih.gov.
    Place: Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway (Rt. 
1), Grand Ballroom C, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Stephen P James, MD, Director, Division of 
Digestive Diseases & Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and 
Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Rm 677, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5450, 301-594-7680, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69897829a95999b9b9292b69b979f9ad8989f9ed8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8c6c9dcc4cbc7c5c5cccce8c5c9c1c486c6c1c086cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: March 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1512 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ruth P. Dimmick *v.*Elizabeth M. Cooley.

Two cases. Motion to strike cases from the calendar denied, without costs.
^»hnrvin^ 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Tony Pelegrin <tpelegrin@afsamail.org> 

Tuesday, May 09, 2017 9:39 AM 

Douglas Kodish; Lezhi Irving 

Margaret Abernathy (maabernathy@bakerlaw.com); Mark Braden Esq. 

(mbraden@bakerlaw.com); Bill Himpler 

Reply to letter April 21, 2017. 

Ron DeSantis Check.pdf; Dennis Ross email 2017-05-08.pdf; Dennis Ross Ltr 

2016-09-01.pdf 

08 May 2017 

Federal Election Commission 

Audit Division 

Attn: Douglas Kodish 

999 E Street N.W. 

Wash, D.C. 20463 

Dear Mr. Kodish, 

This is in response to your letter of April 21, 2017, regarding the Draft Final Audit Report (DFAR). 

A. With regard to Finding 2, Excessive Contributions Made to Federal Candidates, please consider the following: 

(1) Attached is a copy of a check from Ron DeSantis for U.S. Congress Campaign refunding $500.00, 

subsequently deposited on December 9, 2014, per PNC bank statement dated 12/31/2014. As previously 

stated, this check was not reported in FEC 3X. We will disclose this check and correct all subsequent reports. 

(2) The second item is a copy of a letter from AFSAPAC dated Sep 1, 2016, to the Friends of Dennis Ross 

requesting a refund of $500.00. We have checked our records and determined that we have not received 

the funds. An email dated May 8,2017 has been sent and a copy attached for your perusal. 

We further do not request a hearing before the Commission. 

Sincerely, 

Bill Himpler 

Treasurer
§ 605.37 Nonacademic services. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) A recipient to which this subpart applies shall provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in such manner as is necessary to afford handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation in such services and activities.
( 2 ) Nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities may include counseling services, physical recreational athletics, transportation, health services, recreational activities, special interest groups or clubs sponsored by the recipients, referrals to agencies which provide assistance to handicapped persons, and employment of students, including both employment by the recipient and assistance in making available outside employment.
( b ) *Counseling services.* A recipient to which this subpart applies that provides personal, academic, or vocational counseling, guidance, or placement services to its students shall provide these services without discrimination on the basis of handicap. The recipient shall ensure that qualified handicapped students are not counseled toward more restrictive career objectives than are nonhandicapped students with similar interests and abilities.
( c ) *Physical education and athletics.* ( 1 ) In providing physical education courses and athletics and similar aid, benefits, or services to any of its students, a recipient to which this subpart applies may not discriminate on the basis of handicap. A recipient that offers physical education courses or that operates or sponsors interscholastic, club, or intramural athletics shall provide to qualified handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation.
( 2 ) A recipient may offer to handicapped students physical education and athletic activities that are separate or different from those offered to nonhandicapped students only if separation or differentiation is consistent with the requirements of § 605.34 and only if no qualified handicapped student is denied the opportunity to compete for teams or to participate in courses that are not separate or different.
[47 FR 8573, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51381, Aug. 26, 2003]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1982 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acknowledge the receipt of 

medical, disability, and pension claims and other communications submitted by veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan (for herself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. STARK, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. GUTIERREZ, and Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acknowledge 

the receipt of medical, disability, and pension claims 

and other communications submitted by veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Entitlement 

5 to Service (VETS) Act of 2009’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1982 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

2 AFFAIRS OF RECEIPT OF MEDICAL, DIS3 ABILITY, AND PENSION CLAIMS AND OTHER 

4 COMMUNICATIONS SUBMITTED BY VET5 ERANS. 

6 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall acknowledge 

7 the receipt of any claim for medical services, disability 

8 compensation, or pension under the laws administered by 

9 the Secretary for Veterans Affairs, or other communica10 tion relating to such services, compensation, or pension, 

11 submitted to the Secretary by a veteran within 60 days 

12 of receiving the claim or other communication. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Christopher Charles King v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 01137

- CR

Trial court case number: 64792

Trial court: 149 th District Court of Brazoria County

Date motion filed: January 29, 2014

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the appellant ’ s motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

Date: February 11, 2014
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer and I, Terry Mereniuk, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 24, 2006 | (signed) Douglas
      Biles 
|--------------------- | -----------------------------
|                      | Douglas Biles, CEO           
|                      |                              
|                      |                              
|                      | (signed) Terry
      Mereniuk
|                      | Terry Mereniuk, CFO          

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-227 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EMPLOYMENT 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BAHRAIN 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Manama February 26 and 27, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
BAHRAIN 

Employment 

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Manama February 26 and 27, 2007; 

 Entered into force February 27, 2007.
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Yonkers Financial Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-37667 and No. 333-37669) of our report dated November 2, 2001,
except for Note 16 which is as of November 13, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Yonkers Financial Corporation and subsidiary as
of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended September 30, 2001, which report appears in the
September 30, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Yonkers Financial Corporation.





New York, New York
December 28, 2001
Re: Tennessee Democratic Party Audit 

Wade Munday 

to: 

NdlP.Reiflf 

04/25/2014 08:28 PM 

Cc: 

•'RHarris@fec.gov", "matt@mdlangley.com" 

Hide Details 

From: Wade Munday <wade@tndp.org> 

To: "Neil P. ReifP' <reiff@sandlerreifF.com>, 

Cc: "RHarris@fec.gov" <RHarris@fec.gov>, "matt@mdlangley.com'' 

<matt@mdlangley.conl> 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Thank you for the reminder, Randy. As Neil said, we do not have a response. Have a great weekend, all. 

On Apr 25,2014, at 2:58 PM, "Neil P. Reiff' <reifF@sandlen:eifiF.com> wrote: 

Thank you for the reminder. We do not plan to submit a response or request a hearing. 

Nell P. Reiff 

Sandler, Reiff,Young Bt Lamb, P.C. 

1025 Vermont Ave, NW 

Suite 300 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

w. (202)479- 1111 

f. (202)479- 1115 

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and 

may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If the 

. reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any employee or agent responsible for 

delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 

distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

communication in error, please notify us immediately by email. Thank you for your cooperation. 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we 

infomrt you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any 

attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) 

avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, mari<et1ng, or 

recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

NARCISO JOSE ALEJANDRO CASTELLANOS, 

on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 14-cv-12609 

HON. Stephen J. Murphy, III 

 

v. 

 

WORLD WIDE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS USA, 

LLC d/b/a SYSTEMS USA, SYSTEMS USA INC., 

SYSTEMS USA CONSULTING LLC, RAJAT MOHAN, 

ROMI MOHAN, RAHUL MOHAN, JESSICA RODRIGUEZ 

and DOES 1-4 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________________________________/ 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREDJUDICE 

AND WITHOUT COSTS 

NOW COMES Defendants by and through their attorney, NICOLE M. 

MARSHALL, and now comes Plaintiffs’ counsel, JORGE SANCHEZ, who 

hereby stipulate and agree to the following Order for Dismissal with Prejudice and 

without Costs: 

UPON STIPULATION of the parties and the Court being fully advised in 

the premises: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

Case 2:14-cv-12609-SJM-RSW ECF No. 50 filed 06/06/17 PageID.527 Page 1 of 2
1. The Defendants: Romi Mohan, Rahul Mohan, and Systems USA 

Consulting, LLC are hereby dismissed from the above matter with prejudice and 

without costs to either party. 

2. Defendants counter-claim for breach of contract against Plaintiff, 

Narciso Jose Alejandro Castellanos is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without 

costs to either party. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 6, 2017 s/Stephen J. Murphy, III 

 STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III 

 United States District Court Judge 

Presented and signed: June 2, 2017 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 

CONTENT AND MAY BE SIGNED 

BY THE COURT IMMEDIATELY: 

/s/Jorge Sanchez /s/Nicole M. Marshall 

Jorge Sanchez (Illinois ARDC #6244796) Nicole M. Marshall (P73739) 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendants 

Lopez & Sanchez 189 W. Clarkston Rd., Ste 6 

77 W. Washington St, Ste 1313 Lake Orion, MI 48362 

Chicago, IL 60602 (248) 830-1044 

(312) 420-6784 

Case 2:14-cv-12609-SJM-RSW ECF No. 50 filed 06/06/17 PageID.528 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) DJAMEL AMEZIANE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-392 (ESH) ) BARACK OBAMA, et al. , ) ) ) Respondents. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondents’ Moti on for Continuance of the October 7, 2013

hearing [Dkt. No. 325], and considering the curren t furloughs of Justice Department attorneys,

including those assi gned to Guantanamo cases, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is

GRANTED , and that the hearing sche duled for October 7, 2013 is VACATED . The Court will,

however, proceed to decide the motion for release expeditiously.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge

Date: October 2, 2013
§ 122.507 Passenger egress drills. ( a ) The master of a vessel described by 46 CFR 114.110(f) must conduct passenger emergency egress drills from the passengers' assigned overnight accommodation spaces prior to beginning an excursion with new passengers. ( 1 ) If the passengers are not assigned an overnight accommodation space, the master of a vessel described by 46 CFR 114.110(f) must conduct passenger emergency egress drills from an accommodation space prior to beginning an excursion with new passengers.
( 2 ) For the purposes of this section, excursion includes anytime the vessel gets underway, or anytime passengers remain overnight on the vessel.
( b ) Passenger egress drills must be logged or otherwise documented for review by the Coast Guard upon request. The drill entry must include the following information: ( 1 ) Date and time of the drill; and
( 2 ) Number of drill participants.
[USCG-2021-0306, 86 FR 73171, Dec. 27, 2021, as amended by 88 FR 17741, Mar. 24, 2023]