alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,480)
<INVENTORY>                                        137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,842
<PP&E>                                           5,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,350)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,730
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,971
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (316)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (156)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, DNA Looping.
    Date: April 18, 2007.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 496-1485. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16757e77787178567b777f7a38787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f89b9099969f96b895999194d6969190d69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: March 13, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1348 Filed 3-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 304.27 [Reserved]
{01330642.DOCX }

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY KERRIGAN, LORI MIKOVICH 

and RYAN M. VALLI, individually, and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VISALUS, INC., a corporation, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-12693

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

PROMOTER DEFENDANTS’ JOINDER IN VISALUS DEFENDANTS’

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS

NOW COME Defendants A Berry Good Life, Inc., ArriveBy25, Inc., BAM 

Ventures, Inc., BeachLifestyle Enterprises, LLC, Michael Craig, Aaron Fortner, 

Freedom Legacy, LLC, Gooder, LLC, Got Heart Global, Inc., Rachel Jackson, 

Jaketrz, Inc., Holley Kirkland, Timothy Kirkland, Anthony Lucero, Rhonda 

Lucero, M-Power Path, Inc., Kevin Merriweather, Mojos Legacy, LLC, Network 

Dynamics America Corp., Jason O’Toole, Jason O’Toole International Holdings, 

Inc., OCD Marketing, Inc., Kyle Pacetti, Jr., Lori Petrilli, Power Couple, Inc.,

Prospex Automated Wealth Systems, Inc. Red Letters, LLC, Residual Marketing, 

Inc., Gary J. Reynolds, Jake Trzcinski, Frank Varon, Wealth Builder International 

LLC, Tara Wilson, and 9248-2587 Quebec, Inc., by and through their attorneys, 

2:14-cv-12693-MFL-DRG Doc # 191 Filed 10/19/17 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 8084
{01330642.DOCX }

2

Seyburn, Kahn, and hereby join in the ViSalus Defendants’ Reply in Support of 

Motion to Strike Class Allegations and adopt the reasons set forth therein.

SEYBURN KAHN, P.C.

/s/ Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487)

Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487)

2000 Town Center, Suite 1500

Southfield, MI 48075 

Tel.: 248-351-3587 

Fax: 248-353-3727

E-Mail: brosenbaum@seyburn.com

Attorneys for Defendants A Berry Good 

Life, Inc., ArriveBy25, Inc., BAM Ventures, 

Inc., BeachLifestyle Enterprises, LLC, 

Michael Craig, Aaron Fortner, Freedom 

Legacy, LLC, Gooder, LLC, Got Heart 

Global, Inc., Rachel Jackson, Jaketrz, Inc., 

Holley Kirkland, Timothy Kirkland, 

Anthony Lucero, Rhonda Lucero, M-Power 

Path, Inc., Kevin Merriweather, Mojos 

Legacy, LLC, Network Dynamics America 

Corp., Jason O’Toole, Jason O’Toole 

International Holdings, Inc., OCD 

Marketing, Inc., Kyle Pacetti, Jr., Lori 

Petrilli, Power Couple, Inc., Prospex 

Automated Wealth Systems, Inc. Red 

Letters, LLC, Residual Marketing, Inc.,

Gary J. Reynolds, Jake Trzcinski, Frank 

Varon, Wealth Builder International LLC, 

Tara Wilson, and 9248-2587 Quebec, Inc.

Dated: October 19, 2017

2:14-cv-12693-MFL-DRG Doc # 191 Filed 10/19/17 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 8085
{01330642.DOCX }

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 19, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing paper 

with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of 

such filing to all counsel of record.

SEYBURN KAHN, P.C.

/s/ Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487)

Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487)

2:14-cv-12693-MFL-DRG Doc # 191 Filed 10/19/17 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 8086
§ 115.120 Certificate of Inspection amendment. ( a ) An amended Certificate of Inspection may be issued at any time by any OCMI. The amended Certificate of Inspection replaces the original, but the expiration date remains the same as that of the original. An amended Certificate of Inspection may be issued to authorize and record a change in the dimensions, gross tonnage, owner, managing operator, manning, persons permitted, route permitted, conditions of operations, or equipment of a vessel, from that specified in the current Certificate of Inspection.
( b ) A request for an amended Certificate of Inspection must be made to the cognizant OCMI by the owner or managing operator of the vessel at any time there is a change in the character of a vessel or in its route, equipment, ownership, operation, or other similar factors specified in its current Certificate of Inspection.
( c ) The OCMI may require an inspection prior to the issuance of an amended Certificate of Inspection.
#### Waller v. City of Morganfield.

(Decided March 19, 1918.)

DRURY & DRURY and T. S. WALLER, JR., for appellant.

FLOURNOY *&*FLOURNOY, W. T. HARRIS, L. C. FLOURNOY and W. B. HARRIS for appellee.

Response to Petition for Rehearing by

Judge Carroll.

A careful re-examination of the record has satisfied us that we did not make any material mistake in the opinion — which may be found in 178 Ky. 75 — in saying that the witnesses were asked, “What was the difference in the fair market value of all this property just before it was generally known that the change in' grade would be made and the value just after the change was made, disregarding any enhancement resulting from the construction of a brick street and granatoid sidewalk?”

But we have come to the conclusion that we did make a mistake in saying in the opinion that in view of this evidence the instructions given by the court, although erroneous, were not prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant, and so much of the opinion as recites that the instructions given by the court were not pre^ *57judicial to the substantial rights of the appellant and as affirmed the judgment is withdrawn, and the judgment is reversed, with directions for a new trial -not inconsistent with the views expressed in the opinion as modified.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual Report of SDC International,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for  the  year
ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Adams,
Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 29, 2003


/s/Ronald A. Adams
---------------------------
Ronald A. Adams
Chief Executive Officer
Press Office
1325 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463
Phone: Local 523-4065 Toll Free 800-424-9530

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY CONTACT: FRED EILAND

JANUARY 28, 1985 SHARON SNYDER
DEBORAH STUTZ

FEC SAYS PAC'S TOP 4,000 FOR 1984

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Election Commission has released its semiannual

official tally of PAC's for 1984. As of December 31, 1984, there were 4,009

PAC's registered with the agency, an increase of 13% over the number in existence

at the end of 1983.
Official counts of registered PAC's are compiled by the FEC twice yearly,

in January and July. Figures below represent PAC growth over the past ten years.

Federal Election Commission "PAC" GROWTH -- FROM 1974
\) Press Office
J.) (202)523-4065
me” (800)424-9530

Committee Type

Trade/
Membership/
Health

12/31/74 89 318*

na/2a/7sl/ 357*

5/10/762/ 294 452*

12/31/76 433 489*

[12/31/77 550 438 110 8 20

12/31/78 784 (785) 451 (453) 165 (162) 12 24

08/00/79 884 (885) 481 (483) 209 (206) 13 27

k2/31/79 949 (950) 240 (514) 250 (247) 17 32

07/01/80 1,106 (1,107) 255 542 (544) 312 _ (309) 23 41

12/31/80 1,204 (1,206) 297 (576) 378 (374) 42 56

07/01/81 1,251 (1,253) 303 (579) 445 (441) 38 64

12/31/81 1,327 (1,329) 318 (614) 539 (531) 41 68

07/01/82 1,415 (1,417) 350 (627) (628) 45 82

12/31/82 1,467 (1,469) 380 628 (649) 146 (723) AT 103

07/01/83 1,512 (1,514) 379 641 (664) 165 (740) 50

12/31/83 1,536 (1,538) 378 617 (643) 821 (793) 51 122

07/01/84 1,639 (1,642) 381 628 (662) 977 (940) 53 125

12/31/84 1,682 394 698 1,053 52 130

1/ On November 24, 1975, the Commission issued Advisory Opinion 1975-23 "SUNPAC".

2/ On May 11, 1976, the President signed the Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976, P.L, 94-283.

= For the years 1974-1976, these numbers represent all other political ‘committees...no further categorization is available.

** Values for 12/31/84, include corrections to classifications of 43 committees previously included in the Non-Connected
category which are actually separated segregated funds of ‘corporations and membership organizations. Corrected values
for previous years appear in parentheses for this release. Future publications will contain only corrected values.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8540
LEE MARVIN WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID L. SMITH, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-876-R) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Marvin Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day periodestablished by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed.R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court dismissed Appellant's action by order entered August 22, 1995. On October 10, 1995, Appellant filed somepapers which the district court construed as a motion for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion for reconsiderationon October 27, 1995. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 13, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtainan extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Third Meeting, Special Committee 212, Helicopter Terrain 
Awareness and Warning System (HTWAS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 212, Helicopter Terrain 
Awareness and Warning System (HTWAS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of RTCA 
Special Committee 212, Helicopter Terrain Awareness and Warning System 
(HTWAS).

DATES: The meeting will be held April 11, 2007, from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at American Eurocopter, 2701 Forum 
Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas 75052.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Adivisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 212 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> April 11:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Administrative Remarks, Agenda Overview).
    <bullet> The Draft Protection Scenario Document will be Vetted by 
full Committee.
    <bullet> The full committee will begin work on the Minimum 
Operations Standards (MOPS) for HTAWS.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Other Business, Establish Agenda, 
Date and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. Pre-Registration for this meeting is not required for 
attendance but is desired and can be done through the RTCA secretariat. 
With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present 
oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements 
or obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present 
a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 8, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-1302 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 75.216 Special provisions for awards to commercial organizations as recipients. ( a ) This section contains provisions that apply to awards to commercial organizations. These provisions are in addition to other applicable provisions of this part, or they make exceptions from other provisions of this part for awards to commercial organizations.
( b ) *Prohibition against profit.* Except for awards under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer Research (STTR) programs (15 U.S.C. 638), no HHS funds may be paid as profit to any recipient even if the recipient is a commercial organization. Profit is any amount in excess of allowable direct and indirect costs.
( c ) *Program income.* Except for grants for research, program income earned by a commercial organization may not be used to further eligible project or program objectives except in the SBIR and STTR programs.
( d ) ( 1 ) Commercial organizations that receive awards (including for-profit hospitals) have two options regarding audits: ( i ) A financial related audit of a particular award in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, in those cases where the commercial organization receives awards under only one HHS program; or, if awards are received under multiple HHS programs, a financial related audit of all awards in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; or
( ii ) An audit that meets the requirements contained in subpart F.
( 2 ) Commercial organizations that receive annual awards totaling less than the audit requirement threshold in subpart F are exempt from HHS audit requirements for that year, but records must be available for review by appropriate officials of Federal agencies or the Government Accountability Office. (See § 75.501).
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated at 81 FR 3015, Jan. 20, 2016]
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.30 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.31 Filed 09/05/14 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.32 Filed 09/05/14 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.33 Filed 09/05/14 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.34 Filed 09/05/14 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.35 Filed 09/05/14 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.36 Filed 09/05/14 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:14-mc-51141-NGE ECF No. 3, PageID.37 Filed 09/05/14 Page 8 of 8
#### § 2105.13 In what order are responses usually made?

The Agency ordinarily will respond to requests according to their order of receipt within their processing track.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA MCPHEE,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-CV-13216

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 18), GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 17), AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 14)

Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, which were

referred to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. On July 27, 2015,

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford issued her report, recommending that the court grant

defendant’s motion for summary judgment, deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,

and affirm the Commissioner’s decision. The magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation stated that any objections to her report were to be filed within 14 days of

service, and that failure to file such objections constituted a waiver of any further right of

appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). No such objections were filed by

either party.

The court has reviewed the record and briefing in this matter, as well as the

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and accepts the result recommended

therein. The administrative law judge’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, and

-1-

2:14-cv-13216-GCS-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 08/18/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1815
is therefore AFFIRMED. Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 17)

is GRANTED, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 18, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

August 18, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

-2-

2:14-cv-13216-GCS-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 08/18/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1816
Exhibit 21

GENSYM CORPORATION

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                 |  |                              
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Gensym International Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|                                 | 
|Gensym Holding Corporation       |  | Delaware                     
|                                 | 
|Gensym Securities Corporation    |  | Massachusetts                
|                                 | 
|Gensym B.V.                      |  | The Netherlands              
|                                 | 
|Gensym S.A.                      |  | France                       
|                                 | 
|Gensym Srl.                      |  | Italy                        
|                                 | 
|Gensym MENA                      |  | Tunisia                      
|                                 | 
|Gensym Japan Corporation         |  | Japan