alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DONNA REID O ’ NEIL and CHARLES IAN NASH, as Co

- Trustees of the Margaret E. Reid Income Only Irrevocable Trust dated November 14, 2012

, Appellant s ,

v.

MARGARET REID FALLON , a former Co

- Trustee of the Margaret E. Reid Income Only Irrevocable Trust dated November 14, 2012, Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 1020

[ March 30, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Paige Hardy Gillman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2017

- CA

004399

- XXXX

- MB

.
Benjamin Sunshine and Yueh

- Mei Kim Nutter of Brinkley Morgan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Laura Bourne Burkhalter of Laura Bourne Burkhalter, P.A

. , Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., D AMOORGIAN and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 79.33 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 79.22(a).
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to ( 1 ) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth,
( 2 ) avoid needless consumption of time, and
( 3 ) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity pro se or designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 08536

Attention:  Ms. Bonnie Huff / Ms. Janet Boyer

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Ms. Huff and Ms. Boyer:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreements  concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:       /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         -----------------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director


AGREED AND ACCEPTED

WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.


By:       /S/ Bonnie Huff
         -----------------------------------

Print Name:   Bonnie Huff
             -------------------------------
                Chief Financial Officer


DRMcA/sr
Exhibit
32.2





Chief
Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W.
Gifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  February
      5, 2010
              /s/ David W. GiffordDavid
      W. GiffordChief
      Financial Officer
#### § 75.215 Disclosure of lobbying activities.

Recipients are subject to the restrictions on lobbying as set forth in 45 CFR part 93.

[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated at 81 FR 3015, Jan. 20, 2016]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DARREL PAGE, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § No. 488, 2016 § § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 9911016961 § § § Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: November 7, 2016

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VAUGHN , and SEITZ , Justices.

ORDER

This 7 th day of November 2016, it appears to the Court tha t: (1) On October 3, 2016, the appellant, Darrel Page, fil ed a notice of appeal from a September 14, 2016 Superior Court ord er denying his motion to compel the production of documents in his former co unsel’s possession. The

Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to show cause di recting Page to show why his appeal should not be dismissed based on this Court' s lack of jurisdiction under Article IV, § 11(1)(b) of the Delaware Constitution to hear an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case. In his response to the notice to show cause, Page contends that this Court has jurisdiction to hear his appeal and argues the merits of his appeal.2

(2) Under the Delaware Constitution, this Court may re view only a final judgment in a criminal case. 1 The Superior Court's denial of Page’s motion to compel is an interlocutory, not final, order. 2 This Court therefore does not have jurisdiction to review this appeal. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b). 2 See, e.g. , Whitfield v. State , 2007 WL 2751208, at *1 (Del. Aug. 13, 2007) (desc ribing denial of motion to compel discovery as an interlocutory orde r); Cooper v. State , 2004 WL 3186198, at *1 (Del. Dec. 29, 2004) (concluding that denial of mot ion to compel was an interlocutory order). 3 Gottlieb v. State , 697 A.2d 400, 401 (Del. 1997).
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                            18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                 SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Network  Installation
Corporation, (the "Company") on  Form  10-Q for the period  ended  September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date  hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael A. Novielli, Chairman and Interim CFO of the Company,
certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/  Michael  Novielli
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael  Novielli
                                  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer

Dated:  November  13,  2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.
#### § 109.339 Location of fire axes.

The master or person in charge shall insure that the fire axes required in § 108.499 of this subchapter are located in the enclosures for fire hoses marked in accordance with § 108.633 of this subchapter, if the fire axes are not located in plain view.
#### SWIFT *v.*THE STATE.

The evidence not being sufficient to show beyond all reasonable doubt that the representations relied on as a foundation for the accusation of cheating and swindling were false, the court erred in not granting a new trial.

Submitted October 18,

Decided November 8, 1906.

Accusation of misdemeanor. Before Judge Boan. City court of Douglas. June 20, 1906.

*591*Rogers &*Heath, *A. J. McDonald,*and *O. A. Ward,*for plaintiff in error. *M. D. Dickerson, solicitor, W. O. Lankford,*and *Quincey ,& McDonald, contra.*

Atkinson, J.

This was a prosecution for cheating and swindling. The prosecutor claimed that the accused represented to him •that a certain number of ties had been cut, under a contract entered into between them, and that on the faith of those representations various amounts of money had been advanced by the prosecutor to the defendant. It was also contended that these representations were false as to the number of ties, and the prosecutor was thereby defrauded and cheated on account of the advances made being in excess'of the number of ties cut. The evidence as to the number of ties actually cut is not sufficient to show beyond all reasonable doubt that the representations of the accused were false. Such being the case, the accused should not have been convicted under the accusation. The court erred in not granting a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All thf. Justices concur.*
[Cite as State v. Vanderhorst, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5759.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v . V ANDERHORST , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State v. Vanderhorst, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5759.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Williams. (No. 2012-1303—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 7, 2012.
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 97242, 2012-Ohio-2762.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of State v. Williams , 134 Ohio St.3d 482, 2012-Ohio-5699, ___ N.E.2d ___.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.
O’D ONNELL , J., dissents.

__________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Nathaniel McDonald, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

______________________
#### § 2400.47 Summer Institute's relationship to fellowship.

Each year, the Foundation normally offers during July a four-week graduate-level Institute on the principles, framing, ratification, and implementation of the United States Constitution at an accredited university in the Washington, DC, area. The Institute is an integral part of each fellowship.

[69 FR 11815, Mar. 12, 2004]
#### § 109.521 Cranes: General.

The master or person in charge shall ensure that each crane is operated and maintained in accordance with the API *Recommended Practice for Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Cranes,* API RP 2D, First Edition (Oct. 1972) with supplement 1.
[No. 3506.]

#### Casserleigh et al. v. Spar Consolidated Mining Co.

*Appeals*— Freehold *Involved*— Remanding *Cause.*An action seeking to enjoin a cloud upon the title to lands does not involve the freehold. No appeal lies from a decree in such cause.

*Appeal from Denver District Court.*Hon. Greeley W. Whitford, Judge.

■Mr. M. B. Carpenter, Mr. F. T. Johnson, for appellants.

Messrs. Thomas, Bryant, Nye & Malburn, for appellee.

Cunningham, Judge.

Appellee, as plaintiff below, brought this action in the district court to remove the cloud from its title to certain mining property, occasioned by the attempted lien asserted by appellant Casserleigh. *427It appears from the complaint that Casserleigh was attempting to subject the property involved to an execution issued on a judgment in his favor and against certain individuals. This action was brought by the mining corporation to enjoin and restrain the sheriff from selling the property under said execution, and to quiet the title of the same in the mining company as against Casserleigh’s' claim under the aforesaid execution. The plaintiff company, appellee here, prevailed in the court below, and this case is in this court on appeal from such judgment.

Counsel for appellants have filed a motion to remand the case to the supreme court, on the ground that, as they assert, a freehold is involved. Under the ruling in *Callbreath v. Hug,*48 Colo., 202, the motion to remand must be denied.

Having determined that a freehold is not involved,- and there appearing no other grounds, under the code, warranting the appeal, the appeal will also be dismissed, and under the authority in the case of *Western Pole and Lumber Company v. City of Golden,*No. 3386, recently determined by this court, the case, will be re-entered as pending on error, and the clerk is hereby instructed to enter the necessary orders in the premises.

Motion to remand denied; appeal dismissed; case re-entered as pending on error.

Httrlbitt, Judge, dissents from so much of the opinion as pertains to the right of the court to reenter the case as pending on error.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of IO World Media, Incorporated  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Bean, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: June 4, 2012
By:
/s/ Thomas J. BeanThomas J. Bean

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

(principal executive officer & principal financial officer)
#### § 10.406 Approved courses.

The NMC maintains the list of training organizations and the approvals given to the training they offer. This information is available online at *www.uscg.mil/nmc.*
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 14965          Edition: 22          Edition Date: October 2011          Clear Dates: NM - 12/17/2011     LNM - 12/6/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
# C_2008211EN.01001701.xml

| 19.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/17

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (static testing)’ (Codified version)

COM(2008) 25 final — 2008/0008 (COD)

(2008/C 211/04)

On 7 March 2008 the Council of the European Union decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (static testing) (Codified version).

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (static testing) (Codified version)

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 444th plenary session of 22 and 23 April 2008 (meeting of 22 April), by 143 votes and 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 22 April 2008

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Varsity Group Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Jack M Benson            
|                         |  | Jack M Benson                
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ground-water conditions andstudies in Georgia [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.42/4:03-4032 | I 19.42/4-6:

Item Number:0624-B (online) | 0624-B-04(online)
CGP systemNumber:000861470
 
2001 | 2002-03 | 2004-05: ReportAppendix | 2006-07 | 2008-09
 
March 24, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

HARRY SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-cv-12385

KIM WORTHY,

Defendants.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court’s “Opinion and Order Granting Defendants’ Motion

to Dismiss and Denying Motion to Strike” dated October 30, 2014,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered against Plaintiff

Harry Scott and in favor of Defendant Kim Worthy. 

Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 30th day of October 2014.

 DAVID J. WEAVER

 CLERK OF THE COURT

s/ Lisa Wagner 

By: Lisa Wagner, Case Manager

 to Judge Robert H. Cleland

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\14-12385.SCOTT.Judgment.wpd

2:14-cv-12385-RHC-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 10/30/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 87