### Review Draft

Completion of the tabs in this spreadsheet isOPTIONAL.

Any cost information that you provide would be very useful to EPA for purposes of evaluating the costs of control measures that may be considered as regulatory options. Cost information from within the last 10-12 years is requested (e.g., costs dating back to 1998). Cost information could come from vendor quotes for APCD or equipment changes that either have been implemented or were not implemented.

The EPA recognizes that cost information can be sensitive. You may claim any information provided in this spreadsheet as confidential business information (CBI) and EPA will handle the information accordingly. The EPA's procedures for handling CBI are described in the letter that accompanied the pulp and paper information collection request (ICR). If your spreadsheet response contains any CBI, please be sure to follow the instructions in section C2 of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Because this spreadsheet is an optional component of your ICR response, it may be submitted later than the other portions of your response. EPA requests that you supply the cost information requested in this spreadsheet by{INSERT DATE 60 DAYS FOLLOWING ICR SUBMITTAL DATE}.

Two tables are included in this spreadsheet: APCD costs, and Equip change costs

The EPA is particularly interested in costs of the following air pollution control devices (APCD). Please supply this information using theAPCD coststemplate

. - Recovery furnace scrubbers, dry sorbent injection/fabric filter (DI/FF), selective catalytic reduction (SCR), or selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) - Black liquor oxidizer incinerators or thermal oxidizers - Lime kiln electrostatic precipitators (ESP) - Bleach plant CO control devices

The EPA is particularly interested in costs of the following process changes or equipment changes/upgrades. Please supply this information using theEquip change coststemplate

. - Changing from a direct contact evaporator (DCE) to non-direct contact evaporator (NDCE) recovery furnace - Changing from a wet bottom ESP to a dry bottom ESP - Changing from a dry bottom/wet PM return ESP to a dry bottom/dry PM return ESP - Adding chambers/fields to an existing ESP - Installation of quarterary air ports in the recovery furnace to improve combustion efficiency - Process changes to improve lime mud washing or to control makeup water quality in the causticizing area - Replacing a recovery furnace with a black liquor gasification system

Notes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 1 of 12OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx Review Draft

Complete the table below for air pollution control devices (APCD) installed/retrofitted in 1998 or later. If any responses to the following questions are not known, please indicate UK (unknown) or NA (not available). Follow instructions insection D5 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Instruction: Provide for all entries. This should match NEI Site ID used in other portions of your survey response. Line IDs should match those used in other portions of your survey response. Enter Pulping line ID for pulp mill equipment, Bleaching line ID for bleach plant equipment, or Emission Unit ID of paper machine with which paper mill equipment are affiliated. If equipment is shared between 2 lines (e.g., chemical recovery equipment serving 2 pulping lines) then indicate both Line IDs separated by an underscore "_." See subpart S definitions of "pulping line" and "bleaching line" if needed. Enter Emission Unit ID(s) controlled by the APCD

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Line ID (Pulping line ID, Bleaching line ID, or paper machine Emission Unit ID) Emission Unit ID Example entry: 99999Kraft1 RF1 99999Kraft1 RF1 99999Kraft1 LK1

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 2 of 12Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No Do you consider the entire contents of this spreadsheet tab to be CBI? Yes/No If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and submit this spreadsheet according to the section C1 of the survey overview document.

Enter APCD_ID for which cost information is being provided Was the APCD retrofitted on an existing emission unit? Select yes/no Was the APCD installed at the same time the emission unit was newly installed? Select yes/no Identify the expected equipment life of the installed control device. This should be provided in years and estimated from the initial date of installation. CAPITAL COSTS

Year of the capital costs (e.g., 2006). EPA will use to scale costs to the current year used for regulatory analyses.

APCD_ID Retrofit to existing emission unit? Installation on new emission unit? Expected control device equipment life (in yrs) Base year for capital costs (XXXX) SCRB1 yes no 15 2001 SNCR1 yes no 20 2001 ESP1 yes no 20 2001

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 3 of 12Include in the Purchased Equipment Costs the cost of control device and any required ancillary equipment (e.g., fans, pumps, ductwork), instrumentation, sales tax, and freight. Calculated by summing items in B

A.Purchased Equipment Costs B. Direct Installation Costs

Purchased Equipment Costs, Total ($) Foundation and supports, $ Handling and

erection, $ Electrical, $ Piping, $ Insulation for ductwork and piping, $ Painting, $ Other, $ Description of other Total Direct Installation Costs, Total $ 583,800 700,500 1,335,000 58,000 1,751,000 58,000 25,000 3,927,500 2,817,000 0 1,498,000 59,900 748,700 119,800 15,000 29,900 30,000 1,003,300

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 4 of 12Calculated by summing items in C TOTAL Capital Investment (TCI) = (A + B + C)

Calculated Year of the operating costs. Operating costs should be provided for the last 12 month period (calendar or fiscal year) for which the mill has data.

C. Indirect Costs TOTAL Capital Investment (TCI)

Engineering Construction

and field expenses Contractor fees Start-up Performance test Contingencies Total Indirect Costs, Total $ TOTAL Capital Investment, Total $ Base year for operating costs (XXXX) 500,000 584,000 584,000 58,000 36,000 175,000 1,937,000 6,448,300 2001 140,000 141,000 141,000 78,000 500,000 3,317,000 2001 300,000 295,000 150,000 15,000 15,000 75,000 850,000 3,351,300 2001

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 5 of 12Please identify any major maintenance materials or parts and specify the approximate annual expenditures per item used for the APCD. Specify total annual labor hours and $/hr Calculated

D. Maintenance materials and replacement parts E.Operation/maintenance labor costs

Item 1 description Item 1 cost,

$/yr Item 2

description Item 2 cost,

$/yr Item 3

description Item 3 cost,

$/yr Item 4

description Item 4 cost, $/yr Annual maintenance labor hours Maintenance labor

rate, $/hr Annual labor costs, $/yr Various parts 53,000 1,050 25.40 26,670 Parts 178,980 1,050 25.40 26,670 Materials 101,000 800 25.40 20,320

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 6 of 12Purchased electricity costs (specify kWh/yr and $/kWh) Calculated Purchased water usage Calculated Specify if natural gas or propane used (select from menu). Specify

scf/yr and $/scf. Calculated Steam costs (specify lb per year and $/lb) Calculated

F.Utility costs

Electricity, kWhr/yr Electricity

rate, $/KW Annual

electricity costs, $/yr Water, gal/yr Water rate, $/gal Annual water

costs, $/yr Fuel used Amount used, scf/yrFuel rate,

$/scf Annual fuel

costs, $/yr Steam

use, lb/yr Steam rate,

$/lb Annual steam

costs, $/yr 10,963,120 0.05 548,156 74,592,000 0.00058 43,263 92,740 0.05 4,637 1,512,000 0.00058 877 1,571,700 0.05 78,585

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 7 of 12List any additives, chemicals, or sorbents needed to operate the APCD Enter the amount of additive, chemical, or sorbent used. Include units. If multiple types are used, enter the amount separated by commas (e.g., NaOH-4 tpy, KMnO4-0.5 tpy) Enter estimated annual costs for any additives, chemicals, or sorbents needed to operate the APCD

G. Additive/chemical/sorbent costs

Waste treatment or disposal costs, $/yr Additive/chemical/sorbent type Additive/chemical/sorbent amount Additive/chemical/sorbent costs, $/year 3,190 50% caustic soda 380,000 gal/yr 390,000

urea 256 tpy 57,600

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 8 of 12Enter estimated annual costs for disposal of any additives, chemicals, or sorbents needed to operate the APCD Other operating cost description TOTAL Operating Costs = sum of D through I $/yr

Calculated

H. Additive/chemical/sorbent disposal I. Other TOTAL Operating Costs

Additive/chemical/sorbent disposal, $/yr Describe other operating cost Other, $/yr TOTAL Operating Costs, $ 16,000 Liquid analysis 1,800 1,082,079 268,764 199,905

APCD costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 9 of 12OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx Review Draft

Complete this table for any modifications to processes or equipment in the chemical recovery area (other than installation of new APCD's) that were made in 1998 or more recently to reduce air emissions of HAP/organics, PM, NOx, SO2, CO, or TRS or to improve combustion efficiency. If any responses to the following questions are not known, please indicate UK (unknown) or NA (not available). Follow instructions in section D5 of the survey overview document to populate this table.

Instruction: Provide for all entries. This should match NEI Site ID used in other portions of your survey response. Line IDs should match those used in other portions of your survey response. Enter Pulping line ID for pulp mill equipment, Bleaching line ID for bleach plant equipment, or Emission Unit ID of paper machine with which paper mill equipment are affiliated. If equipment is shared between 2 lines (e.g., chemical recovery equipment serving 2 pulping lines) then indicate both Line IDs separated by an underscore "_." See subpart S definitions of "pulping line" and "bleaching line" if needed. Enter a description of process or equipment change for which information is being provided Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Line ID (Pulping line ID, Bleaching line ID, or paper machine Emission Unit ID) Process or equipment change description Example entry: 99999Kraft1 Changing from a DCE to NDCE recovery furnace 99999Kraft1 Changing from a wet to a dry bottom ESP 99999Kraft1 Adding fields to an existing ESP 99999Kraft1 Installation of quarterary air ports in the recovery furnace to improve combustion efficiency 99999Kraft1 Replacing a recovery furnace with a black liquor gasification system

Equip change costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 10 of 12Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No Do you consider the entire contents of this spreadsheet tab to be CBI? Yes/No If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and submit this spreadsheet according to the section C1 of the survey overview document.

Enter Emission Unit ID(s) affected by the process or equipment change Enter APCD_ID affected by the process or equipment change Was the process or

equipment change implemented on existing emission units and/or APCD in the process line? Select yes/no Was the APCD installed at the same time the emission unit was newly installed? Select yes/no Enter the year (e.g., 2006). This will be used as the base year for scaling of costs to current levels. Enter number of days of lost pulp production required to implement the process or equipment change.

If the change occurred during scheduled downtime that would have occurred regardless of the process or equipment change, then do not include the scheduled downtime. Only the days of lost production that can be specifically attributed to the process or equipment change are of interest. Please distinguish between one-time capital and annual operating costs where appropriate. If a breakdown of the specific capital or annual cost items is available, please provide as a separate attachment.

Enter the total capital cost associated with the process or equipment change in this cell.

Emission Unit ID APCD_ID Retrofit to existing equipment in an existing process line? Change implemented in a new process line? Year of process or equipment change (XXXX) Number of days process shut down in order to make the change (days of lost production) Total capital cost, $ RF2 yes no 2001 20 19,664,100 RF1 ESP1 yes no 2001 3 3,266,300 RF1 ESP1 yes no 2001 3 5,372,400 RF1 yes no 2001 3 624,140 RF2 yes no 2001 90 150,000,000

Equip change costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 11 of 12Provide changes in annual operating costs (if estimated).

Otherwise, leave blank.

Include annual operating costs that are an increase to prior operating costs (e.g., additional operating costs due to addition of ESP fields).

If the process or equipment change resulted in decreased annual operating costs, then indicate the cost decrease as a negative number. Describe the air pollutants affected and emissions reduction achieved. indicate the basis for emissions reduction reported (e.g., air emissions testing before and after modification). You may provide this information as a separate attachment to your response if it does not fit here.

Total annual operating cost, $/yr Emission reduction achieved (if quantified) 187,350 gaseous organic HAP - 80% 88,000 Methanol - 48% 214,000 PM -66% 39,800 NOx - 20% (16,340,100) HAP-98%; PM-92%

Equip change costs EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0006.xls 12 of 12