alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2009286EN.01005901.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/59

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008Roll-over protection structures of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (static testing) (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0266

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 June 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (static testing) (codified version) (COM(2008)0025 — C6-0044/2008 — 2008/0008(COD))

2009/C 286 E/18

(Codecision procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0025),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0044/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0234/2008),

| A. | whereas, in the view of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, in the view of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
# C_2008038EN.01000701.xml

| 12.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 38/05)

| Aid No | XE 5/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Castilla y León |
| Title of aid scheme | Subvenciones para la financiación de inversiones en Centros Especiales de Empleo para el año 2008 |
| Legal basis | Orden EYE/2071/2007, de 19 de diciembre, por la que se convocan subvenciones para la financiación de inversiones realizadas en Centros Especiales de Empleo para el año 2008 (BOCyL de 27 de diciembre de 2007) |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,927274 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 27.12.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2008 |
| Objective | Art. 6: Employment of disabled workers |
| Economic sectors | All Community sectors  (1)eligible for employment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Dirección General de Economía Social |
| C/ Pío del Río Hortega, No 8-1o |
| E-47014 Valladolid |

Aid No

XE 5/08

Member State

Spain

Region

Castilla y León

Title of aid scheme

Subvenciones para la financiación de inversiones en Centros Especiales de Empleo para el año 2008

Legal basis

Orden EYE/2071/2007, de 19 de diciembre, por la que se convocan subvenciones para la financiación de inversiones realizadas en Centros Especiales de Empleo para el año 2008 (BOCyL de 27 de diciembre de 2007)

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,927274 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

27.12.2007

Duration

31.12.2008

Objective

Art. 6: Employment of disabled workers

Economic sectors

All Community sectors  (1)eligible for employment aid

1

Name and address of the granting authority

Dirección General de Economía Social

C/ Pío del Río Hortega, No 8-1o

o

o

E-47014 Valladolid

---

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.

1

---
§ 81.22 Amici curiae. ( a ) Any interested person or organization may file a petition to participate in a proceeding as an amicus curiae. Such petition shall be filed prior to the prehearing conference, or if none is held, before the commencement of the hearing, unless the petitioner shows good cause for filing the petition later. The presiding officer may grant the petition if he finds that the petitioner has a legitimate interest in the proceedings, that such participation will not unduly delay the outcome, and may contribute materially to the proper disposition thereof. An amicus curiae is not a party and may not introduce evidence at a hearing.
( b ) An amicus curiae may submit a statement of position to the presiding officer prior to the beginning of a hearing, and shall serve a copy on each party. The amicus curiae may submit a brief on each occasion a decision is to be made or a prior decision is subject to review. His brief shall be filed and served on each party within the time limits applicable to the party whose position he deems himself to support; or if he does not deem himself to support the position of any party, within the longest time limit applicable to any party at that particular stage of the proceedings.
( c ) When all parties have completed their initial examination of a witness, any amicus curiae may request the presiding officer to propound specific questions to the witness. The presiding officer, in his discretion, may grant any such request if he believes the proposed additional testimony may assist materially in elucidating factual matters at issue between the parties and will not expand the issues.
§ 91.43 Mediation. ( a ) HHS will promptly refer to a mediation agency designated by the Secretary all sufficient complaints that: ( 1 ) Fall within the jurisdiction of the Act and these regulations, unless the age distinction complained of is clearly within an exception; and,
( 2 ) Contain all information necessary for further processing.
( b ) Both the complainant and the recipient shall participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or make an informed judgment that an agreement is not possible.
( c ) If the complainant and the recipient reach an agreement, the mediator shall prepare a written statement of the agreement and have the complainant and the recipient sign it. The mediator shall send a copy of the agreement to HHS. HHS will take no further action on the complaint unless the complainant or the recipient fails to comply with the agreement.
( d ) The mediator shall protect the confidentiality of all information obtained in the course of the mediation process. No mediator shall testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course of the mediation process without prior approval of the head of the mediation agency.
( e ) The mediation will proceed for a maximum of 60 days after a complaint is filed with HHS. Mediation ends if: ( 1 ) 60 days elapse from the time the complaint is filed; *or*
( 2 ) Prior to the end of that 60-day period, an agreement is reached; *or*
( 3 ) Prior to the end of that 60-day period, the mediator determines that an agreement cannot be reached. This 60-day period may be extended by the mediator, with the concurrence of HHS, for not more than 30 days if the mediator determines that agreement will likely be reached during such extended period.
( f ) The mediator shall return unresolved complaints to HHS.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE
  OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the
  Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
  Report), I, John Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and I, Terry Mereniuk,
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that:

|1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.



|Dated:  May 20, 2004 |  | /s/ John Anderson  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------
|                     |  | John Anderson, CEO 
|                     |  |                    
|                     |  | /s/ Terry Mereniuk 
|                     |  | Terry Mereniuk, CFO

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL HORACEK, #218347,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 14-CV-13545

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

DANIEL HEYNS, MICHAEL MARTIN,

and BRAD PURVES,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER TRANSFERRING

ACTION TO WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN (DOC. #21)

Pro se plaintiff Daniel Horacek objects to the magistrate judge’s order granting

defendants’ motion to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the

Western District of Michigan under 28 U.S.C. § 1406. This case is now pending in the

Western District of Michigan, No. 15-cv-00038. Therefore, the Western District of

Michigan now has jurisdiction over this action. The court lacks jurisdiction to address

plaintiff’s objection.

In any event, it is worth noting that plaintiff’s claims have become moot based on

his parole from prison. Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc, et seq.,

while incarcerated by the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), at the

Newberry Correctional Facility in Newberry, Michigan. Plaintiff alleged that the

defendants implemented a vegan menu for all religious diets that violated his religious

-1-

2:14-cv-13545-GCS-DRG Doc # 23 Filed 03/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 221
needs as an observant Orthodox Jew. Plaintiff sought a temporary restraining order

and other injunctive relief precluding the implementation of the MDOC’s vegan menu. 

However, on March 11, 2015, after this case had been transferred, plaintiff filed a notice

of change of address informing the court that his address changed (Doc. #22). A review

of the Michigan Offender Tracking System shows that plaintiff was paroled from prison

on March 3, 2015. Because plaintiff is no longer a prisoner affected by the MDOC’s

policies, his requested relief in the complaint is moot.

For these reasons, the court declines to address plaintiff’s objection to the

magistrate judge’s order transferring this action to the Western District of Michigan

under 28 U.S.C. § 1406. Plaintiff is directed to file any papers related to this action in

the Western District of Michigan, Case No. 15-cv-00038. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

March 23, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on

Daniel Horacek, 951 Indianwood Road, 

Lake Orion, MI 48362.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

-2-

2:14-cv-13545-GCS-DRG Doc # 23 Filed 03/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 222
5 10

4

3

1

9

6

8

7

 make simple switches 

 To make half your grains whole grains, substitute a

	 whole-grain product for a refined-grain product. For 

example, eat 100% whole-wheat bread

or bagels instead of white bread or bagels,

or brown rice instead of white rice.

 whole grains can be healthy snacks Popcorn, a whole grain, can be 

a healthy snack. Make it with 	 	

little or no added salt or butter.

Also, try 100% whole-wheat or rye crackers.

 

 save some time Cook extra bulgur or barley when you have time.

Freeze half to heat and serve later as a quick 

side dish.

mix it up with whole grains

Use whole grains in mixed dishes, such as barley 

in vegetable soups or stews and bulgur wheat in 

casseroles or stir-fries. Try a quinoa salad or pilaf.

 

 try whole-wheat versions For a change, try brown rice or whole-wheat pasta. 

Try brown rice stuffing in baked green peppers or

tomatoes, and whole-wheat macaroni 

in macaroni and cheese.

 bake up some whole-grain goodness

 Experiment by substituting buckwheat, millet, or oat 

flour for up to half of the flour in pancake, waffle,

muffin, or other flour-based recipes. They may need a bit

more leavening in order to rise.

 be a good role model for children

 Set a good example for children by serving and 

eating whole grains every day with meals or as snacks.

check the label for fiber Use the Nutrition Facts label to check the fiber

content of whole-grain foods. Good sources of fiber

contain 10% to 19% of the Daily Value;

excellent sources contain 20% or more.

 know what to look for

 on the ingredients list

 Read the ingredients list and 

choose products that name a wholegrain ingredient first on the list. Look for “whole wheat,”

“brown rice,” “bulgur,” “buckwheat,” “oatmeal,” “whole-grain

cornmeal,” “whole oats,” “whole rye,” or “wild rice.”

 be a smart shopper

 The color of a food is not an indication that it is 

	 a whole-grain food. Foods labeled

as “multi-grain,” “stone-ground,” “100% wheat,”

“cracked wheat,” “seven-grain,” or “bran” are

usually not 100% whole-grain products, and 

may not contain any whole grain.

2

make half your 

grains whole

10 tips to help you eat whole grains

Any food made from wheat, rice, oats, cornmeal, barley, or another cereal grain is a grain 

product. Bread, pasta, oatmeal, breakfast cereals, tortillas, and grits are examples. Grains are divided into two

subgroups, whole grains and refined grains. Whole grains contain the entire grain kernel—the bran, germ, and 

endosperm. People who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some chronic diseases.

 DG TipSheet No. 4

 June 2011

Center for Nutrition USDA is an equal opportunity 

Policy and Promotion Go to www.ChooseMyPlate.gov for more information. provider and employer.

10

tips

Nutrition 

Education Series
§ 115.660 Continued participation in the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program. ( a ) To continue to participate in the AHE Program, vessel operators must conduct an annual hull condition assessment. At a minimum, vessel operators must conduct an internal examination and take random hull gaugings internally during the hull condition assessment, unless waived by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI). If the annual hull assessment reveals significant damage or corrosion, where temporary repairs have been made, or where other critical areas of concern have been identified, the OCMI may require an expanded examination to include an underwater hull examination using divers. If an underwater examination is required, the examination must focus on areas at higher risk of damage or corrosion and must include a representative sampling of hull gaugings.
( b ) If an underwater survey is required for the annual hull condition assessment, the OCMI may require the presence of a third party examiner and a written hull examination report must be submitted to the OCMI. This report must include thickness gauging results, a copy of the audio and video recordings and any other information that will help the OCMI evaluate your vessel for continued participation in the AHE program. The third party examiner must sign the report and confirm the validity of its contents.
( c ) You must submit your preventive maintenance reports or checklists on an annual basis to the OCMI. These reports or checklists must conform to the plans you submitted in your application under § 115.630 of this part, which the OCMI approved.
( d ) Prior to each scheduled annual hull condition assessment— ( 1 ) The owner may submit to the OCMI a plan for conducting the assessment, or a request for a waiver of this requirement, no fewer than 30 days before the scheduled assessment; and
( 2 ) The OCMI may reduce the scope or extend the interval of the assessment if the operational, casualty, and deficiency history of the vessel, along with a recommendation of the vessel's master, indicates that it is warranted.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21082, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended by USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47383, Aug. 5, 2004]
§ 108.699 Substitution of life preservers. A work vest may not be substituted for a required life preserver— ( a ) For the life saving equipment requirements of this part; or
( b ) For use during drills and emergencies.
§ 92.206 Equal program access on the basis of sex. ( a ) A covered entity must provide individuals equal access to its health programs and activities without discriminating on the basis of sex.
( b ) In providing access to health programs and activities, a covered entity must not: ( 1 ) Deny or limit health services, including those that have been typically or exclusively provided to, or associated with, individuals of one sex, to an individual based upon the individual's sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded;
( 2 ) Deny or limit, on the basis of an individual's sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded, a health care professional's ability to provide health services if such denial or limitation has the effect of excluding individuals from participation in, denying them the benefits of, or otherwise subjecting them to discrimination on the basis of sex under a covered health program or activity;
( 3 ) Adopt or apply any policy or practice of treating individuals differently or separating them on the basis of sex in a manner that subjects any individual to more than de minimis harm, including by adopting a policy or engaging in a practice that prevents an individual from participating in a health program or activity consistent with the individual's gender identity; or
( 4 ) Deny or limit health services sought for purpose of gender transition or other gender-affirming care that the covered entity would provide to an individual for other purposes if the denial or limitation is based on an individual's sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded.
( c ) Nothing in this section requires the provision of any health service where the covered entity has a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for denying or limiting that service, including where the covered entity typically declines to provide the health service to any individual or where the covered entity reasonably determines that such health service is not clinically appropriate for a particular individual. A covered entity's determination must not be based on unlawful animus or bias, or constitute a pretext for discrimination. Nothing in this section is intended to preclude a covered entity from availing itself of protections described in §§ 92.3 and 92.302.
( d ) The enumeration of specific forms of discrimination in paragraph (b) of this section does not limit the general applicability of the prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section.
# CE2010008EN.01012201.xml

| 14.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 8/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 8/122

---

Tuesday 23 September 2008European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0417

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 September 2008 on the proposal for a decision ofthe European Parliament and of the Council concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009) (COM(2008)0159 — C6-0151/2008 — 2008/0064(COD))

2010/C 8 E/24

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0159),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 149 and 150 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0151/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0319/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Tuesday 23 September 2008P6_TC1-COD(2008)0064

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 23 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 1350/2008/EC.)

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WENDY WAGNER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Civil Action No. 11-1841 (JEB)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court 

ORDERS that: 

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and

3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ James E. Boasberg

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge

Date: November 2, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01841-JEB Document 41 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 1