alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 95.627 Waivers. ( a ) *Application for a waiver.* A State may apply for a waiver of any requirement in subpart F by presenting an alternative approach. Waiver requests must be submitted and approved as part of the State's APD or APD Update.
( b ) *Waiver approvals.* The Secretary, or his or her designee, may grant a State a waiver if the State demonstrates that it has an alternative approach to a requirement in this chapter that will safeguard the State and Federal Governments' interest and that enables the State to be in substantial compliance with the other requirements of this chapter.
( c ) *Contents of waiver request.* The State's request for approval of an alternative approach or waiver of a requirement in this chapter must demonstrate why meeting the condition is unnecessary, diminishes the State's ability to meet program requirements, or that the alternative approach leads to a more efficient, economical, and effective administration of the programs for which federal financial participation is provided, benefiting both the State and Federal Governments.
( d ) *Review of waiver requests.* The Secretary, or his or her designee, will review waiver requests to assure that all necessary information is provided, that all processes provide for effective economical and effective program operation, and that the conditions for waiver in this section are met.
( e ) *Agency's response to a waiver request.* When a waiver is approved by an agency, it becomes part of the State's approved APD and is applicable to the approving agency. A waiver is subject to the APD suspension provisions in § 95.611(c)(3). When a waiver is disapproved, the entire APD will be disapproved. The APD disapproval is a final administrative decision and is not subject to administrative appeal.
[75 FR 66340, Oct. 28, 2010]
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As
Adopted Pursuant to





Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael D. Michie, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
      May 15, 2008
            /s/ Michael D.
      Michie
              Michael D. Michie
              Chief Financial Officer






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Senate Floor Activity - Tuesday, February 4, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Tuesday, February  4)

H.R. 2642

 21

S. 1845

 S.Amdt. 2631

 22

 S.Amdt. 2632

 S.Amdt. 2633

 S.Amdt. 2634

 S.Amdt. 2635

 S.Amdt. 2714

 S.Amdt. 2715

 S.Amdt. 2716

 S.Amdt. 2717

 S.Amdt. 2718

S. 1950

S. 1963

S.Res. 344

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
Case 1:14-cv-00148-RJL Document 41 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 1
----

----

|                                                                                                                                                    |   | Year ended December 31, |   |   | Year ended December 31, |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                    |   | 2009                    |   |   | 2008                    |   |
|                                                                                                                                                    |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |
|                                                                                                                                                    |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |
| Weighted average number of shares used in the computation     of basic earning (loss) per share                                     |   |                    | 2,606  |   |                    |   | 2,396 |   |
|                                                                                                                                                    |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of shares used in the computation     of diluted earning per share                                          |   |                    | 2,606  |   |                    |   | 2,396 |   |
|                                                                                                                                                    |   |                    |   |   |                    |   |   |   |
| Options and warrants which were not included in the computation of     diluted earning (loss) per share due to anti dilutive effect |   |                    | 1,333  |   |                    |   | 803 |   |

----

----
§ 98.56 Restrictions on the use of funds. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Funds authorized under section 418 of the Social Security Act and section 658B of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act, and all funds transferred to the Lead Agency pursuant to section 404(d) of the Social Security Act, shall be expended consistent with these regulations. Funds transferred pursuant to section 404(d) of the Social Security Act shall be treated as Discretionary Funds;
( 2 ) Funds shall be expended in accordance with applicable State and local laws, except as superseded by § 98.3.
( b ) *Construction.* ( 1 ) For State and local agencies and nonsectarian agencies or organizations, no funds shall be expended for the purchase or improvement of land, or for the purchase, construction, or permanent improvement of any building or facility. However, funds may be expended for minor remodeling, and for upgrading child care facilities to assure that providers meet State and local child care standards, including applicable health and safety requirements. Improvements or upgrades to a facility which are not specified under the definitions of construction or major renovation at § 98.2 may be considered minor remodeling and are, therefore, not prohibited.
( 2 ) For sectarian agencies or organizations, the prohibitions in paragraph (b)(1) of this section apply; however, funds may be expended for minor remodeling only if necessary to bring the facility into compliance with the health and safety requirements established pursuant to § 8.41.
( 3 ) Tribes and tribal organizations are subject to the requirements at § 98.84 regarding construction and renovation.
( c ) *Tuition.* Funds may not be expended for students enrolled in grades 1 through 12 for: ( 1 ) Any service provided to such students during the regular school day;
( 2 ) Any service for which such students receive academic credit toward graduation; or
( 3 ) Any instructional services that supplant or duplicate the academic program of any public or private school.
( d ) *Sectarian purposes and activities.* Funds provided under grants or contracts to providers may not be expended for any sectarian purpose or activity, including sectarian worship or instruction. Assistance provided to parents through certificates is not a grant or contract. Funds provided through child care certificates may be expended for sectarian purposes or activities, including sectarian worship or instruction when provided as part of the child care services.
( e ) *Non-Federal share for other Federal programs.* The CCDF may not be used as the non-Federal share for other Federal grant programs, unless explicitly authorized by statute.
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 67588, 67590, Sept. 30, 2016]
§ 84.1 Purpose and broad coverage. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to implement section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) *Broad coverage.* The definition of “disability” in this part shall be construed broadly in favor of expansive coverage to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of section 504. The primary object of attention in cases brought under section 504 should be whether entities receiving Federal financial assistance have complied with their obligations and whether discrimination has occurred, not whether the individual meets the definition of “disability.” The question of whether an individual meets the definition of “disability” under this part should not demand extensive analysis.
[89 FR 40179, May 9, 2024]
#### § 211.5 Action under State law; appointment of guardian.

Whenever an eligible person is incapable of giving his consent to care and treatment in a hospital, either because of his mental condition or because he is a minor, the agency will take appropriate action under State law, including, if necessary, procuring the appointment of a legal guardian, to ensure the proper planning for and provision of such care and treatment.
§ 109.203 Sanitation. ( a ) The master or person in charge shall insure that the accommodation spaces are in a clean and sanitary condition.
( b ) The chief engineer, or engineer in charge if no chief engineer is required, shall insure that the engineering spaces are in a clean and sanitary condition.
§ 86.6 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by this part are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, as amended; sections 799A and 845 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295h-9 and 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. 206 and 206(d)); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation. (Secs. 901, 902, 905, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374, 375; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1685)
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement which would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association which would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and which receives Federal financial assistance.
(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)
[40 FR 24137, June 4, 1975, as amended at 70 FR 24321, May 9, 2005]
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, April 16, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett. Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

* 68 3 James F. Hoobler, of New York, to be Mar 22, 91 Mr. Bumpers, 

Inspector General, Small Business Committee on Small 

Administration, vice Charles R. Gillum, Business, without printed 

resigned. report. Apr 11, 91 

Committee on Governmental 

Affairs Discharged. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
#### §§ 84.48-84.50 [Reserved]
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00766 (ABJ)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

and

CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM,

 Defendant

and

HISPANIC LEADERSHIP FUND,

Defendant

MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

Pursuant to Rule 8(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure IntervenorDefendant Hispanic Leadership Fund (“HLF”) hereby moves this Court for an Order staying the 

Court’s judgment of May 30, 2012, pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia Circuit and the rendering of a decision by the appellate court. 

Defendant CFIF does not oppose this motion. Defendant Federal Election Commission 

has not yet determined it position on this motion. Plaintiff Representative Van Hollen opposes 

this motion. A memorandum in support of this motion and proposed order are attached.

Dated: April 5, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 52 Filed 04/05/12 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

Respectfully submitted,

Holtzman Vogel Josefiak PLLC

By: /s/ Jason Torchinsky

Jason Torchinsky (Bar No. 976033)

jtorchinsky@holtzmanlaw.net

HOLTZMAN VOGEL JOSEFIAK PLLC

45 North Hill Drive, Suite 100

Warrenton, VA 20186

Tel: (540) 341-8808

Fax: (540) 341-8809

Counsel for Hispanic Leadership Fund

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 52 Filed 04/05/12 Page 2 of 2
JOHN L. RICHARDSON, P.L.L.C.

2700 CALVERT STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20008

(202) 371-2258

(202) 667-2539 (FAX)

JRICHARDSON@JOHNLRICHARDSON.COM

August 8, 2011

Ms. Dorothy Beard

Director

Office of Information Services

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington D.C. 20590

Re: Docket OST-2011-0083 - Amerijet International, Inc.

Dear Ms. Beard:

We have completed the polling on behalf of Amerijet International, Inc. in connection with

its August 5, 2011 application for an extension of startup date. Please note that, in addition to the

parties on the certificate of service, we have also served a copy of Amerijet's application on the

following individuals: Courtney Felts (for FedEx), Peter Beckett (for Polar); Steve Morrissey (for

United); and Daniel Weiss (for Continental). No party has objected to approval of the application.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Respectfully submitted,

~ ~RiChardson

Counsel for Amerijet International, Inc.

cc: Mr. Brett Kruger
# CE2010016EN.01007701.xml

| 22.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 16/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 16/77

---

Request for waiver of the immunity of Massimo D'Alema

P6_TA(2008)0538

European Parliament decision of 18 November 2008 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Massimo D'Alema (2008/2298(IMM))

(2010/C 16 E/20)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Massimo D'Alema, forwarded by the Public Prosecution Service at the Court of Milan on 30 May 2008, and announced in plenary sitting on 16 June 2008, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Massimo D'Alema, forwarded by the Public Prosecution Service at the Court of Milan on 30 May 2008, and announced in plenary sitting on 16 June 2008,

| — | having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

| — | having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

1

| — | having regard to Rules 6 and 7 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 6 and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0422/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0422/2008),

1.   Decides not to authorise the use of the telephone intercepts in question and not to waive the immunity of Massimo D'Alema;

2.   Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the competent Italian authorities.

---

(1)  Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391.

1

Wagner

Fohrmann and Krier

Wybot

Faure and others

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Gensym Corporation:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated March 25, 2002 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements (File Numbers: 333-03855, 333-03857,
333-03861, 333-03863, 333-29707, 333-53455, 333-38464, 333-38488 and 333-63008).

                                          /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
§ 707.5 Notice. ( a ) The Agency shall make available to all employees, applicants, and other interested persons, as appropriate, information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the Agency, and such information shall be made available to the extent the Staff Director finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this part.
( b ) The Agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The Agency shall take appropriate steps to provide individuals with disabilities with information regarding their section 504 rights under the Agency's programs or activities.
#### Fichtenberg *v.*City of Atlanta.

Bumpkin, J.

1. The word “dealer” generally applies to one who buys and sells, — a trader. But where a municipal ordinance declares that “any merchant, billiard table or ten-pin alley keeper, or other dealer, who shall keep open doors on the Sabbath day,” shall be subject to a punishment prescribed, the word “dealer” is to be construed in connection with • the words preceding it. So construed, it would include one who operated a “penny arcade” or place where a number of machines were kept for profit, each of which, by a mechanical arrangement, exhibited pictures to a person who dropped a penny into a slot.

2. Where a municipal ordinance which contained the prohibition against keeping open doors on the Sabbath day, set out in the foregoing note, also declared that it should be permissible to keep open doors on that day for the selling of certain specified articles, including soda and mineral waters, and then stated that “the privileges of this ordinance shall be confined exclusively to those' who deal only in the articles above enumerated or refex-red to, and by those who are entitled by law to keep open on the Sabbath day,” *Held,*that this did not authorize one who had a soda-water fountain in the front portion of a store, and beyond it kept for pi'ofit machines for the exhibition of pictures of the kind *63' above described, to keep open the doors for the conduct of both businesses on the Sabbath.

Submitted May 21,

Decided July 27, 1906.

Certiorari. Before Judge Pendleton.- Fulton superior court. March 28, 1906.

*Reuben R. Arnold*and *Ligón Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*James L. May son*and *William P. Hill,*contra.

3. The fact that on Sunday there were fewer electric lights than on other days of the week, that no music was played as on other days, and that the attendants were excused and change was made at the soda water fountain, would make, no difference.

4. Where a portion of a municipal ordinance in respect to keeping open "doors on the Sabbath was valid, the addition of certain other portions which may have been invalid as undertaking to deal with matters punishable by State law would not prevent a conviction of one guilty of violating the valid portion. *Rothschild*v. *Darien,*69 *Ga.*503.

f>. There was no error in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*