alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,297
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,946
<PP&E>                                          72,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 735,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,117
<BONDS>                                        403,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   735,750
<SALES>                                         95,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,007
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,631)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       331
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,962)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 75.446 Idle facilities and idle capacity. ( a ) As used in this section the following terms have the meanings set forth in this section: ( 1 ) Facilities means land and buildings or any portion thereof, equipment individually or collectively, or any other tangible capital asset, wherever located, and whether owned or leased by the non-Federal entity.
( 2 ) Idle facilities means completely unused facilities that are excess to the non-Federal entity's current needs.
( 3 ) Idle capacity means the unused capacity of partially used facilities. It is the difference between: ( i ) That which a facility could achieve under 100 percent operating time on a one-shift basis less operating interruptions resulting from time lost for repairs, setups, unsatisfactory materials, and other normal delays and;
( ii ) The extent to which the facility was actually used to meet demands during the accounting period. A multi-shift basis should be used if it can be shown that this amount of usage would normally be expected for the type of facility involved.
( 4 ) Cost of idle facilities or idle capacity means costs such as maintenance, repair, housing, rent, and other related costs, *e.g.,* insurance, interest, and depreciation. These costs could include the costs of idle public safety emergency facilities, telecommunications, or information technology system capacity that is built to withstand major fluctuations in load, *e.g.,* consolidated data centers.
( b ) The costs of idle facilities are unallowable except to the extent that: ( 1 ) They are necessary to meet workload requirements which may fluctuate and are allocated appropriately to all benefiting programs; or
( 2 ) Although not necessary to meet fluctuations in workload, they were necessary when acquired and are now idle because of changes in program requirements, efforts to achieve more economical operations, reorganization, termination, or other causes which could not have been reasonably foreseen. Under the exception stated in this subsection, costs of idle facilities are allowable for a reasonable period of time, ordinarily not to exceed one year, depending on the initiative taken to use, lease, or dispose of such facilities.
( c ) The costs of idle capacity are normal costs of doing business and are a factor in the normal fluctuations of usage or indirect cost rates from period to period. Such costs are allowable, provided that the capacity is reasonably anticipated to be necessary to carry out the purpose of the Federal award or was originally reasonable and is not subject to reduction or elimination by use on other Federal awards, subletting, renting, or sale, in accordance with sound business, economic, or security practices. Widespread idle capacity throughout an entire facility or among a group of assets having substantially the same function may be considered idle facilities.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation (the “Company”)for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersignedofficer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigned’s knowledge,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: May 30, 2007 |                                         |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/ Dimitri J.  Andritsoyiannis              |
|                     | Dimitri J. Andritsoyiannis                   |
|                     | *Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 52008AP0214 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52008AP0214

**Banning of exports and the safe storage of metallic mercury ***II European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 May 2008 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the banning of exports and the safe storage of metallic mercury (11488/1/2007 — C6-0034/2008 — 2006/0206(COD)) - P6_TC2-COD(2006)0206 Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 21 May 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No …/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the banning of exports of metallic mercury and certain mercury compounds and mixtures and the safe storage of metallic mercury **

*
Official Journal C 279 E , 19/11/2009 P. 0166 - 0166 *

Banning of exports and the safe storage of metallic mercury ***II

P6_TA(2008)0214

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 May 2008 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the banning of exports and the safe storage of metallic mercury (11488/1/2007 — C6-0034/2008 — 2006/0206(COD))

(2009/C 279 E/34)

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (11488/1/2007 — C6-0034/2008),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0636),

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0102/2008),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Texts Adopted, 20.6.2007, P6_TA(2007)0267.

--------------------------------------------------

P6_TC2-COD(2006)0206

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 21 May 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the banning of exports of metallic mercury and certain mercury compounds and mixtures and the safe storage of metallic mercury

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No .../2008.)

--------------------------------------------------
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1204 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and NAURU 

Signed at Washington February 26, 2003 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
NAURU 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Washington February 26, 2003; 

 Entered into force December 4, 2003.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 26, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00359

- CR

Laura Flores MESSICK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR11174

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellant was convicted of murder, and the trial court appointed appellate counsel. On

appeal, appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, and Appellant filed a pro se brief in response.

We issued a memorand um opinion on July 29, 2020, affirming Appellant’s conviction. On

August 28, 2020, Appellant filed a subsequent brief with this court, which was addressed in the

caption to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Based on the record and Appellant’s pro se filing, it is

unclear what her intent was.

We construe Appellant’s August 28, 2020 filing as a motion for rehearing. However, a

motion for rehearing was due on August 13, 2020. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 49.1. Appellant did not

file a motion for extension of time, and we cannot imply one. See id

. R. 49.8; Olivo v. State

, 918

S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Furthermore, our plenary power over the judgment

expired on September 27, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 19.1(a). Accordingly, we DENY

Appellant’s August 28, 2020 motion for rehearing as untimely.

If Appellant desires to file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals, Appellant must comply with Rule 68 of the Texas Rule s of Appellate

Procedure. See id

. R. 68. The petition should be addressed to Clerk of the Court of Criminal

Appeals, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Henry Huber Company, Appellant, *v.*Edward J. McCabe et al., Composing the Firm of E. J. McCabe and Company, et al., Defendants, and The New England Realty Company et al., Respondents

*Euler Company*v. *MeCale,*124 App. Div. 936, affirmed.

(Argued October 14, 1909;

decided October 29, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 11, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court ‘ at a Trial Term in an action for conversion.

*Albert Ritchie*and *Donald McLean*for appellant.

*Arthur 8. Daria*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholders


of
      World
      Energy Solutions, Inc.:





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (File No. 333-1140014) of our Report dated March 20, 2007, (which report
      expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
      to the Company’s change
      in
      its method of accounting for share based payments upon the adoption of Statement
      of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based
      Payment”, effective
      January 1, 2006)relating to the consolidated financial statements which
      appear in the Annual report to Shareholders, which is included in this Annual
      Report on From 10-K of World Energy Solutions, Inc., for the year ended December
      31, 2006.








/s/
      UHY,
      LLP








Boston,
      Massachusetts


March
      21,
      2007
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 75806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Forum on Human Factors Research Necessary To Support Advanced 
Vehicle Safety Technologies; Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION:  Meeting notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA published a document in the Federal Register of November 
20, 2006, concerning a meeting notice for a forum on Human Factors 
Research Necessary to Support Advanced Vehicle Safety Technologies. The 
document did not contain the Docket Number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Perel, 202-366-5675.

Correction

    Federal Register of November 20, 2006, on page 67203, in the first 
column, correct the ``NHTSA Docket Number'' caption to read: NHTSA 
Docket No. NTSA-2006-26286.

    Dated: December 7, 2006.
Joseph N. Kanianthra,
Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety Research.
[FR Doc. 06-9735 Filed 12-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
[No. 3419.]

#### Empire Ranch and Cattle Co. v. Howell et al.

Judgment affirmed on the authority of the opinion in No. 3417 ante.

*Appeal from Yuma District Court.*Hon. H. P. • Burke, Judge.

Mr. August Muntzing, Mr. Egbert More, for appellant.

Mr. John F. Mail, for appellee.

*Per curiam.*

Judgment affirmed on the authority of *The Empire Ranch and Cattle Company v. Herrick et al.,*No. 3417.

*Affirmed.*
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-01576 Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 14 of 14
**Exhibit
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PER SECTION
      302**


****


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      302 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


I, Peter
      Gallic, certify that:


1.
      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Crystal
      International Travel Group, Inc.;


2.
      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
      to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this
      quarterly report


3.
      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.
      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
      and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the registrant and I have:


a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by, or caused such disclosure controls and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
      recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
      and


5.
      I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a)
      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
      or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
      likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and


b)
      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
      over
      financial reporting.





/s/
              Peter GallicChief
              Financial OfficerJune
              20,
              2007
EX-10.4.2


  Exhibit 10.4.2

 
  

 
 

	 
	 InMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 Suite #340- 200 Granville St.

Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4
 Canada
  



 
  
  

 
  
  

01 SEPTEMBER 2018
  

 
 Dear Eric Hsu,

 
 In recognition of your agreement to increase your work commitment to InMed to 80% of
full time, I am pleased to make the following changes to your compensation:
  
 Base
Salary - will increase to $224,000 as of the date of this letter; and
  

Options - subject to approval by the Board of Directors, you will be issued an additional 270,000 options to purchase common shares in the Company as per the
Company’s standard options policies, priced on or around the date of this letter.
  

On behalf of the entire Management Team and Board of Directors, thank you for your contributions to the Company’s success and we look forward to achieving more,
together.
  
 /s/ Eric A. Adams

Eric A. Adams President and CEO
 InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.
#### §§ 11.202-11.210 [Reserved]
§ 672.22 Appeal from or review of initial decision. ( a ) *Notice of appeal.* Any party may appeal any adverse initial decision of the Presiding Officer by filing a notice of appeal and an accompanying appellate brief with the Hearing Clerk and upon all other parties and amicus curiae within twenty (20) days after the initial decision is served upon the parties. The notice of appeal shall set forth alternative findings of fact, alternative conclusions regarding issues of law or discretion, and a proposed order together with relevant references to the record and the initial decision. The appellant's brief shall contain a statement of the issues presented for review, argument on the issues presented, and a short conclusion stating the precise relief sought, together with appropriate references to the record. Within twenty (20) days of the service of notices of appeal and briefs, any other party or amicus curiae may file with the Hearing Clerk a reply brief responding to argument raised by the appellant, together with references to the relevant portions of the record, initial decision, or opposing brief. Reply briefs shall be limited to the scope of the appeal brief.
( b ) *Sua sponte review by the Director.* Whenever the Director determines sua sponte to review an initial decision, the Hearing Clerk shall serve notice of such intention on the parties within forty-five (45) days after the initial decision is served upon the parties. The notice shall include a statement of issues to be briefed by the parties and a time schedule for the service and filing of briefs.
( c ) *Scope of appeal or review.* The appeal of the initial decision shall be limited to those issues raised by the parties during the course of the proceeding. If the Director determines that issues raised, but not appealed by the parties, should be argued, he shall give the parties or their representatives written notice of such determination to permit preparation of adequate argument. Nothing herein shall prohibit the Director from remanding the case to the Presiding Officer for further proceedings.
( d ) *Argument.* The Director may, upon request of a party or sua sponte, assign a time and place for oral argument.
] 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-13 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the ) 

Oklahoma Leadership Council ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

; 

[ Commission, do hereby certify that on September 01,2016, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit R^ort on the 

Oklahoma Leadership Council, as reconunended in the Memorandum from the 

Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated August 29,2016. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the iQ^rrityiission