alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-920 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWAZILAND 

Signed at Mbabane May 10, 2006 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SWAZILAND 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement signed at Mbabane May 10, 2006; 

 Entered into force September 20, 2006.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Health Express USA, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.

August 14, 2002                    /s/ Douglas Baker
                                   ----------------------
                                   Douglas Baker
                                   Chief Executive Officer
§ 287.130 Can NEW Program activities include job market assessments, job creation and economic development activities? ( a ) A Tribe may conduct job market assessments within its NEW Program. These might include the following: ( 1 ) Consultation with the Tribe's economic development staff or leadership that oversees the economic and employment planning for the Tribe;
( 2 ) Consultation with any local employment and training program, Workforce Development Boards, One-Stop Centers, or planning agencies that have undertaken economic and employment studies for the area in which the Tribe resides;
( 3 ) Communication with any training, research, or educational agencies that have produced economic development plans for the area that may or may not include the Tribe; and
( 4 ) Coordination with any State or local governmental agency pursuing economic development options for the area.
( b ) The Tribe's NEW Program may engage in activities and provide services to create jobs and economic opportunities for its participants. These services should be congruous with any available local job market assessments and may include the following: ( 1 ) Tribal Employment Rights Office (TERO) services;
( 2 ) Job creation projects and services;
( 3 ) Self-employment;
( 4 ) Self-initiated training that leads a client to improved job opportunities and employment;
( 5 ) Economic development projects that lead to jobs, improved employment opportunities, or self-sufficiency of program participants;
( 6 ) Surveys to collect information regarding client characteristics; and
( 7 ) Any other development and job creation activities that enable Tribal members to increase their economic independence and reduce their need for benefit assistance and supportive services.
§ 111.50-5 Location of overcurrent protective devices. ( a ) *Location in circuit.* Overcurrent devices must be at the point where the conductor to be protected receives its supply, except as follows: ( 1 ) The generator overcurrent protective device must be on the ship's service generator switchboard. (See § 111.12-11(g) for additional requirements.)
( 2 ) The overcurrent protection for the shore connection conductors must meet § 111.30-25(f).
( 3 ) If the overcurrent device that protects the larger conductors also protects the smaller conductors, an overcurrent device is not required at the supply to the smaller conductors.
( 4 ) If the overcurrent device protecting the primary side of a transformer also protects the conductors connected to the secondary side, as determined by multiplying the current-carrying capacity of the secondary conductor by the secondary to primary transformer voltage ratio, and this protection meets § 111.20-15 of this chapter, an overcurrent device is not required at the supply to the secondary side conductors.
( b ) *Location on vessel.* Each overcurrent device: ( 1 ) Must be: ( i ) Readily accessible; and
( ii ) In a distribution panelboard, switchboard, motor controller, or similar enclosure; and
( 2 ) Must not be: ( i ) Exposed to mechanical damage; and
( ii ) Near an easily ignitable material or where explosive gas or vapor may accumulate.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16362, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan of SmartServ
Online, Inc. and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements between SmartServ Online,
Inc. and its employees and non-employee directors of our report dated August 15,
2000, except for footnote 13 as to which the date is September 28, 2000, with
respect to the financial statements of SmartServ Online, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended June 30, 2000 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
October 5, 2000
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

 Defendant, 

CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, 

 Intervenor-Defendant, 

HISPANIC LEADERSHIP FUND, 

 Intervenor-Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00766 (ABJ) 

NOTICE OF APPEAL BY INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT 

CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM 

Intervenor-Defendant Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) appeals to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from the November 25, 2014 

judgment of the district court (Dkt. Nos. 99 (order) & 100 (memorandum opinion)) granting 

Plaintiff Van Hollen’s motion for summary judgment, denying CFIF’s cross-motion for 

summary judgment, and vacating 11 C.F.R. § 104.20(c)(9), as well as from all orders and rulings 

merged therein, including without limitation the May 1, 2013 order of the district court (Dkt. No. 

91) denying CFIF’s motion for leave to amend.

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 101 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 3
2 

January 9, 2015 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Thomas W. Kirby 

Jan Witold Baran (D.C. Bar No. 233486) 

Thomas W. Kirby (D.C. Bar No. 915231) 

Caleb P. Burns (D.C. Bar No. 474923) 

Samuel B. Gedge (D.C. Bar No. 1007635) 

WILEY REIN LLP 

1776 K Street NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel.: 202.719.7000 

Fax: 202.719.7049 

Counsel for Center for Individual Freedom

 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 101 Filed 01/09/15 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on January 9, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit 

by using the Court’s CM/ECF system, thereby serving all persons required to be served. 

/s/ Thomas W. Kirby 

 Thomas W. Kirby 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 101 Filed 01/09/15 Page 3 of 3
§ 900.201 Environmental review process. ( a ) *General.* The environmental review process is the investigation of potential environmental impacts to determine the environmental process to be followed and to assist in the preparation of the environmental document.
( b ) *Early coordination.* Applicants will contact the Commission and work with the Approving Official to begin the environmental review process as soon as Denali Commission assistance is projected. Environmental issues shall be identified and considered early in the proposal planning process. A systematic, interdisciplinary approach that includes community involvement and intergovernmental coordination to expand the potential sources of information and identify areas of concern will be used. Environmental permits and other forms of approval, concurrence, or consultation may be required. The planning process shall include permitting and other review processes to ensure that necessary information will be collected and provided to permitting and reviewing agencies in a timely manner.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

                               ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT

CoolBrands International Inc.

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109213) of CoolBrands International Inc. of
our report dated December 9, 2005 (except for Note 17, which is as of December
23, 2005) to the consolidated financial statements which is included in this
Form 20-F/A (Amendment No.1).

/s/ BDO Dunwoody LLP
----------------------

Chartered Accountants

Toronto Ontario
July 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32-1

 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc. (formerly
ICT Technologies, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vasilios Koutsobinas, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


May 14, 2008
#### § 112.01-20 Final emergency power source.

A final emergency power source is one that automatically supplies power to the emergency loads under § 112.15-5 and automatically transfers the temporary emergency loads under § 112.15-1 when the potential of the final emergency source reaches 85 to 95% of normal value.

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16368, Mar. 16, 2023]
#### § 111.20-15 Protection of transformers against overcurrent.

Each transformer must have protection against overcurrent that meets Article 450 of NFPA 70 or IEC 60092-303:1980 (both incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16361, Mar. 16, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2003 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2003

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to include certain children's 
   psychiatric hospitals under the program of payments to children's 
      hospitals that operate graduate medical education programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2009

 Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to include certain children's 
   psychiatric hospitals under the program of payments to children's 
      hospitals that operate graduate medical education programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children's Hospitals Education 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN CHILDREN'S PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS UNDER THE 
              PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS THAT OPERATE 
              GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 340E(g)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
256e(g)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``means a'' and inserting ``means--
                    ``(A) a'';
            (2) by striking the period and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) a freestanding psychiatric hospital with 90 
                percent or more inpatients under the age of 18, that 
                has its own Medicare provider number as of December 6, 
                1999, and that has an accredited residency program.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 108.661 Unit markings: Draft marks. ( a ) Each unit must have draft marks for each foot of immersion— ( 1 ) If the unit is a surface unit, on both the port and starboard sides of the stem and the stern-post or rudderpost or at any other place at the stern of the unit as may be necessary for easy observance;
( 2 ) If the unit is a self-elevating unit, near each corner of the hull but not more than 4 required; and
( 3 ) If the unit is a column-stabilized unit, on each corner column, continuing to the footing or lower displacement hull.
( b ) The bottom of each mark must be at the draft indicated by that mark.
( c ) Each mark must be— ( 1 ) In numerals 15 centimeters (6 inches) high; and
( 2 ) In contrasting color to the background.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, “draft” means the distance from the bottom of the keel or the lowest shell plate on the outer surface of the unit to the surface of the water, except that where a unit has a permanent appendage extending below the bottom of the keel, “draft” means the distance from the lowest part of the appendage to the surface of the water.
( e ) In cases where draft marks are obscured due to operational constraints or by protrusions, the vessel must be fitted with a reliable draft indicating system from which the draft can be determined.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56808, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41823, Sept. 11, 1992]
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2023 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical 

desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within 7 years after the date of its submission by 

9 the Congress: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 34 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys3 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 14989 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:17

- cr - 00397

- CEH

- AEP

- 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus
SILVIO ANGULO

- CORTES , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (July 16, 2019) Before TJOFLAT , MARCUS and JORDAN , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-14989 Date Filed: 07/16/2019 Page: 1 of 22 Ryan Truskoski , appointed counsel for Silvio Angulo

- Cortes in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of t he relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Angulo

- Cortes’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED
.

Case: 18-14989 Date Filed: 07/16/2019 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 4.18

SMARTSERV
[LOGO]

2250 Butler Pike, Suite 150
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

December ___, 2003

------------------
------------------
------------------

          Re:       Convertible  Debentures  issued on November 11, 2003, in the
                    original principal amount of $25,000 (the "Debenture")
                    ------------------------------------------------------------


Dear Sir/Madam:

          The Company has not yet concluded the equity financing into which your
Debenture  will  automatically  convert  (referred  to in  your  Debenture  as a
"Qualified  Private  Offering").  We  expected  to close the  Qualified  Private
Offering by no later than  February 19,  2004.  The purpose of this letter is to
obtain your consent to the  amendment  of the  Maturity  Date and to obtain your
waiver of any rights you may have that would prohibit this amendment.

          The undersigned  hereby agrees that its Debenture is hereby amended as
follows:

                    Each  reference to the date  "December 19, 2003,"  including
          without  limitation,  the  reference  made in Section (i) of the first
          Paragraph,  shall be deleted and  replaced  with the  following  date:
          "February 19, 2004"

          In consideration for the execution and delivery of this letter by you,
the Company agrees to issue to you a warrant,  at an exercise price of $1.50 per
share, to purchase ______ shares of SmartServ common stock (this number is equal
to 25% of the shares of common stock underlying your Debenture,  as adjusted for
the one-for-six  reverse stock split effective  November 25, 2003). This warrant
will have a  three-year  term and will be  identical  in form to the  warrant(s)
issued with your Debenture.

          Except as expressly  amended  herein,  all terms and conditions of the
Debentures and Warrants shall remain in full force and effect. Defined terms not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Debenture.

          Please do not  hesitate  to  contact  me with any  questions  at (610)
397-0689, extension 203.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Thomas W. Haller
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Thomas W. Haller
                                            Title: SVP & Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>



Accepted and agreed this ___
day of December, 2003

_____________________________________
Name:
Title (If Applicable): ______________
Company (If Applicable): ____________



                       PLEASE RETURN THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT
                     VIA FAX TO TOM HALLER AT (610) 397-0846
§ 90.45 Information requirements. Each agency shall provide in its regulations a requirement that the recipient: ( a ) Provide to the agency information necessary to determine whether the recipient is in compliance with the Act; and
( b ) Permit reasonable access by the agency to the books, records, accounts, and other recipient facilities and sources of information to the extent necessary to determine whether a recipient is in compliance with the Act.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 9, 2019

NO. 03-19-00015-CR

Jedediah James Watson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|           DATE:  June 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Marius Silvasan                                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                       |   |                                                        |   |
|                                                                                       |   |       Marius Silvasan         |   |
|                                                                                       |   |                                                        |   |
|                                                                                       |   |       Chief Executive Officer |   |