alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
Page 9                                               Exhibit 99.2




                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We have examined management's assertion that, as of December 31,
1996, First Omni Bank, N.A. (First Omni) maintained effective
internal control over the servicing of credit card receivables
for First Omni Bank Credit Card Master Trust (the "Trust").

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of the internal
control over the loan servicing process, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of the internal control,
and such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors
or irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also,
projections of any evaluation of the internal control over the
loan servicing process to future periods are subject to the risk
that the internal control may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies and procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that First Omni maintained
effective internal control over the servicing of credit card
receivables for the Trust as of December 31, 1996, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based upon criteria established
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) as described in "Internal Control - Integrated
Framework".



                                      COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.
Baltimore, Maryland
March 21, 1997

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
Page 10




March 21, 1997







                    Assertion by First Omni Bank, N.A.

First Omni Bank, N.A. (First Omni) services credit card
receivables for the First Omni Credit Card Master Trust (the
"Trust").  First Omni maintained effective internal control over
the loan servicing for the Trust as of December 31, 1996, based
upon criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as described in
"Internal Control  Integrated Framework".



 /s/ Richard H. White  
---------------------   
Richard H. White
President & CEO


 /s/ Richard H. Welsh
-------------------------     
Richard H. Welsh
Vice President/Controller


 /s/ Lawrence A. Biasotto 
------------------------- 
Lawrence A. Biasotto
Vice President Technology Mgt.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel, ENCODE Tech DEV RFA's                    

*Date:*                         April 5-6, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         University Inn, 4140 Roosevelt Way NE., Seattle, WA 98105.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: March 15, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1411 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report
of PURE Bioscience (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Andrew J. Buckland, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                 |                                                                  
|---------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|October 26, 2007 | /s/ Andrew J. Buckland
Andrew J. Buckland
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008068EN.01000501.xml

| 13.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/5

---

Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(2008/C 68/03)

| Organisation | Reference | Edition number | Title of the Community specifications | Edition date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Eurocontrol (2) | Spec-0107 | 3.0 | Eurocontrol specification for ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP) (3) | 20.10.2007 |

Organisation

Reference

Edition number

Title of the Community specifications

Edition date

Eurocontrol (2)

2

Spec-0107

3.0

Eurocontrol specification for ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP) (3)

3

20.10.2007

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

1

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, B-1130 Brussels, tel. (32-2) 729 90 11, fax (32-2) 729 51 90.

2

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/sk_community_specs_completed.html

3

---
§ 10.303 Medical waivers, limitations, and restrictions. ( a ) The Coast Guard may grant a waiver if, after review of all relevant supporting medical documents and consultation with the examining physician, as needed, an applicant does not possess the vision, hearing, or general physical condition necessary; and extenuating circumstances warrant special consideration. An applicant may submit to the Coast Guard additional correspondence, records, and reports in support of a waiver. In this regard, recommendations from agencies of the Federal Government operating government vessels, as well as owners and operators of private vessels, made on behalf of their employees, will be given full consideration.
( b ) In general, medical waivers are approved when an applicant does not meet the applicable medical standards, but objective medical evidence indicates that the condition is sufficiently controlled and the effects of medication pose no significant risk to maritime and public safety. The Coast Guard retains final authority for the issuance of medical waivers.
( c ) Medical waivers may be granted with specific conditions to which the applicant must adhere, such as more frequent monitoring of the medical conditions, submission of medical exams and/or tests at varying intervals to track the ongoing status of the medical condition, or operational limitations in the manner the mariner may serve under the MMC.
( d ) The Coast Guard may place an operational limitation on medical and physical conditions. Any operational limitations will be reflected in the medical certificate.
( e ) The Coast Guard may place a restriction on a medical certificate based upon medical and physical conditions of an applicant. Any restriction will be reflected on the medical certificate and may include restriction of route or trade.
Order entered December 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00577-CR

DAVID WAYNE CAHILL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81088-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On December 17, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. We have now received appellant’s brief, together with an 

extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the 

December 17, 2015 order requiring findings.

We GRANT appellant’s December 17, 2015 motion to extend time to file his brief and 

ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
•;-'ARTMEN 

:Ki-TOPEaATiON 

vni! lUY 3i A !h 3 1 

where nature « and culture meet 

Roland Loog, CDME, CMP, Director 

Nancy Fischer, CMP, Director of Sales 

Marcheta Keefer, Sales Managei 

August 17,2010 

Alolifi Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Coininunity Air Service Developnicnl Program (SCASDi*) 

;iloli;>.k-^'f<7iiiol.i:n\' 

Re: Sifuili Coniniiiiuty Air Service Deveiopnieni Grant 

Dear Ms. Ley, 

On behalf of VisitGaitiesvilie, I fully support Gainesville Regional Airport's request for a Sninll Coninuinity Air Service 

Development grant to assist with marketing the new American Bagle Airlines service between Gainesville and Miami and 

the existing, local air carriers, DcHa Air Lines and US Airways. The relationship between Miami and Gainesville is very 

deep because of (he University of Florida, Shands, and businesses that relate to the Dade County area. 

We believe that North Florida lias a vast array of unique attractions still unknown to most travelers ~ thai our small towns 

are so very special in tlicir ecology, heritage and people that niany traveleis fiom South Florida would seek thetn out. 

Many small businesses in our area will be able to shoNvcase lliemselves to South Florida through tins service, Tourism, 

leisure or business, is a vital part of our region's economy and the connection to Miami through American Ragle Airlines 

opens the door for us to Latin Anieiicn. 

One of Alachua Countj''s primary purposes of travel is Visiting Friends and Relatives (VFR). 'fliis too will help increase 

travel in both direelioiis because of the large number of students, researchers, faculty and employees of the University of 

Florida with strong Miami connections 

Improved air service enhances our elTort lo draw tourists to llie region. For that reason we have connnilled to adveilising 

and i>ronu)ting in-bound traffic on American Eagle Airlines in the amount of $25,000. Again, i urge you to proceed with 

approving the Airpoil Authority''? request for a grant to assist with marketing efforts for llie next two years. Please feel 

free to call me should you need any further information. 

Sincerely, 

(M-^ 

Roland Loog. CDME 

Alachua County Tourist Development Director 

30 E Univetsity Ave. a Gmesville. Floiida 32601 n Tel. (352) 374-5260 a Fax (352) 338-3213 

1-866-778-5002 (loll dee) o E-(Vlail; infot^Svisilqainesvtlle.corn • Web Site; ivw'w.visitgaiiiesville.coiti 

Pa fie 56
§ 800.103 Authority to contract with issuers. ( a ) *General.* OPM may enter into contracts with health insurance issuers to offer at least two MSP options on Exchanges and SHOPs in each State, without regard to any statutes that would otherwise require competitive bidding.
( b ) *Non-profit entity.* In entering into contracts with health insurance issuers to offer MSP options, OPM will enter into a contract with at least one non-profit entity as defined in § 800.20 of this part.
( c ) *Group of issuers.* Any contract to offer MSP options may be with a group of issuers as defined in § 800.20 of this part.
( d ) *Individual and group coverage.* The contracts will provide for individual health insurance coverage and for group health insurance coverage for small employers.
§ 111.75-1 Lighting feeders. ( a ) *Passenger vessels.* On a passenger vessel with fire bulkheads forming main vertical and horizontal fire zones, the lighting distribution system, including low location egress lighting where installed, must be arranged so that, to the maximum extent possible, a fire in any main vertical and horizontal fire zone does not interfere with the lighting in any other fire zone. This requirement is met if main and emergency feeders passing through any zone are separated both vertically and horizontally as widely as practicable.
( b ) *Machinery spaces.* Lighting for enginerooms, boilerrooms, and auxiliary machinery spaces must be supplied from two or more feeders. One of these feeders must be a ship's service feeder.
Note:
Special requirements for emergency lighting, feeders, and branch circuits are in subpart 112.43 of this chapter.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28282, June 4, 1996; 61 FR 33045, June 26, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of World Wide Motion Pictures Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan Mintz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan Mintz
Alan Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2006
#### Towsley v. Dennison.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a report of a referee.

The action was brought by Alonzo Towsley against Henry Dennison and others, upon a contract for stone to be delivered for the construction of a tow-path bridge on the Erie canal. The case upon a former appeal is reported, 45 Barb. 490.

*W. C. Ruger,*for appellant.

*Burton & Ten Eyck,*for respondents.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

There was only a question of fact involved, and the court held that-there was sufficient evidence to warrant the finding of the referee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 13

             CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of VocalTec
Communications Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Amendment"), we, Joseph Albagli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Rafael Wiesler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Amendment fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 16, 2006

By: /s/ Joseph Albagli
Joseph Albagli
Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ Rafael Wiesler
Rafael Wiesler
Chief Financial Officer
§ 98.63 Allotments from the Matching Fund. ( a ) To each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia there is allocated an amount equal to its share of the total available under section 418(a)(3) of the Social Security Act. That amount is based on the same ratio as the number of children under age 13 residing in the State bears to the national total of children under age 13. The number of children under 13 is derived from the best data available to the Secretary for the second preceding fiscal year.
( b ) For purposes of this section, the amounts available under section 418(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 618(a)(3)) excludes the amounts reserved and allocated under § 98.60(b)(1) for technical assistance, research and evaluation, and the national toll-free hotline and Web site and under § 98.62(a) and (b) for the Mandatory Fund.
( c ) Amounts under this section are available pursuant to the requirements at § 98.55(c).
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 67591, Sept. 30, 2016]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1599

_____________________________
K EITH R AYMOND G INNETTI , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. August 17, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , J AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gener al, Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
No. 95-3401

 

Steven L. King, *

*

 Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Nebraska.

Burlington Northern Railroad * [UNPUBLISHED]

Company, A Corporation, *

*

 Appellee. *

 

Submitted: March 13, 1996

 Filed: March 29, 1996

 

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HEANEY, Circuit

 Judges.

 

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant, Steven L. King, is employed by the Burlington Northern

Railroad Company (Burlington). On June 25, 1991, he suffered a back injury

while repairing railroad cars. After undergoing physical therapy, King

returned to work on July 11, 1991. Claiming that his employer negligently

failed to provide him with sufficient assistance, King brought a suit under

the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 (FELA) to recover

damages. Burlington responded that King failed to work safely by failing

to seek help from co-workers, by failing to wait for assistance, and by

failing to complain about his inability to accomplish his tasks. The case

was tried to a jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

On appeal, King argues that the district court failed to properly

instruct the jury with respect to the specific duties
imposed upon a railroad company by FELA. We will not disturb the verdict

so long as the charge, when viewed as a whole, fairly and adequately

reflects the applicable law. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Eason, 17 F.3d

1126, 1132 (8th Cir. 1994). After a careful examination of the challenged

charges, we hold that they are consistent with Eighth Circuit pattern jury

instructions, see Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions—Eighth Circuit

186 (1995), and adequately state the defendant's duties under federal law.

Therefore, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 96.47 Primary care.

Applications for direct funding of Indian tribes and tribal organizations under the primary care block grant must comply with 42 CFR part 51c (Grants for Community Health Services).
#### § 111.105-5 [Reserved]
§ 617.11 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal investigation.* ( 1 ) NSF will investigate complaints that are unresolved after mediation or are reopened because of violation of a mediation agreement.
( 2 ) As part of the initial investigation, NSF will use informal fact finding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and recipient, to establish the facts, and, if possible, will settle the complaint on terms that are agreeable to the parties. NSF may seek the assistance of any involved State agency.
( 3 ) NSF will put any agreement in writing and have it signed by the parties and an authorized official of NSF.
( 4 ) A settlement shall not affect other enforcement efforts of NSF, including compliance reviews, or individual complaints that involve the recipient.
( 5 ) A settlement is not a finding of discrimination against the recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation.* If NSF cannot resolve the complaint through informal investigation, it will begin to develop formal findings through further investigation of the complaint. If the investigation indicates a violation of the Act, NSF will try to obtain voluntary compliance. If NSF cannot obtain voluntary compliance, it will begin enforcement as described in § 617.12. If the investigation does not indicate a violation of the Act, NSF will issue a written determination in favor of the recipient.
[49 FR 49628, Dec. 21, 1984, as amended at 68 FR 51383, Aug. 26, 2003]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL A. FALANA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3482 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 7, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; J. Rogers Padgett, Senior Judge, and Nick Nazaretian, Judge. Michael A. Falana, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Allen v. State, 599 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 1992); Copeland v. State, 118 So. 3d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Lett v. State, 805 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (en banc).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### § 108.657 Unit markings.

The hull of each unit must be marked in accordance with Parts 67 and 69 of this chapter.