alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MORRIS WEATHERSPOON,

#471817,

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-12756

Plaintiff,

DISTRICT JUDGE LAURIE J. MICHELSON

v.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN

SURJIT DINSA, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND

On July 11, 2014, Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon, a prison inmate in the custody of

the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), filed a pro se civil complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical conditions in

violation of the Eighth Amendment. Before the Court is his motion to amend his

complaint [Doc. #89].

Despite the general rule of liberality with which leave to file amended complaints

is to be granted, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) , the Sixth Circuit has held that when a proposed

amended complaint would not survive a motion to dismiss, the court may properly deny

the amendment. Neighborhood Development Corp. v. Advisory Council on Historic

Preservation, 632 F.2d 21, 23 (6 Cir. 1980); Thiokol Corporation v. Department of th

Treasury, 987 F.2d 376 (6 Cir. 1993). th

-1-

2:14-cv-12756-LJM-RSW Doc # 121 Filed 03/01/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1233
Plaintiff seeks to amend his complaint by adding information regarding

Defendants Potts, Conrad, and Jindal. Potts and Conrad, who were allegedly involved in

Plaintiff’s dental care have already been dismissed. I have filed a Report and

Recommendation that Jindal be granted summary judgment. Plaintiff’s requested

amendment would be futile.

Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to amend [Doc. #89] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: March 1, 2017

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

March 1, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla 

Case Manager 

-2-

2:14-cv-12756-LJM-RSW Doc # 121 Filed 03/01/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1234
150°0'0"W

150°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

61°0'0"N

61°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

Figure 24. Alternative E

Preferred Management Categories

Produced in the Division of Realty

and Natural Resources

Anchorage, Alaska

Current to: February 28, 2008

Kenai

NWR

Anchorage

Map

Extent

0 3.75 7.5 15

Miles

08-0052 JGB

Note: This map does not address ownership of navigable waters.

0 5 10 20

Kilometers

C o o k

I n l e t

B a y

K a c h e m a k

Seldovia

Homer

Kenai

Soldotna

Sterling

Cooper

Landing

Seward

Ninilchik

Salamatof

Hope

Tyonek T u r n a g a i n A r m

Chickaloon Bay

Tustumena Lake

Skilak Lake

Gulf of Alaska

Intensive

Moderate

Minimal

Wilderness

State/Private

Refuge Boundary

54,500

49,450

514,550

1,319,500

50,000

2.7%

2.5%

25.9%

66.4%

2.5%

Area Acreage Percentage
FILED: April 22, 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 15-1455

(1:14-cv-00397-AJT-IDD)

___________________

STOP RECKLESS ECONOMIC INSTABILITY CAUSED BY DEMOCRATS, 

("Stop Reid"); TEA PARTY LEADERSHIP FUND; ALEXANDRIA 

REPUBLICAN CITY COMMITTEE

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

AMERICAN FUTURE PAC

 Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant

and

NIGER INNIS; NIGER INNIS FOR CONGRESS

 Plaintiffs

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

 Defendant - Appellee

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

The court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. No judge 

requested a poll under Fed. R. App. P. 35 on the petition for rehearing en banc. 

Appeal: 15-1455 Doc: 36 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
Entered at the direction of the panel: Chief Judge Traxler, Judge Shedd and 

Judge Dillon. 

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Appeal: 15-1455 Doc: 36 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-QSB AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         830
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         9,704
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    33,101
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         7,955
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           7,194
<LOANS>                                        79,492
<ALLOWANCE>                                    430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,400
<DEPOSITS>                                     100,314
<SHORT-TERM>                                   14,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            645
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 134,400
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4,353
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,274
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,627
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,016
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,392
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,235
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  9
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,004
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     696
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   696
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.12
<LOANS-NON>                                    2,135
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               419
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   16
<RECOVERIES>                                   18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              430
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           430
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
§ 900.203 Determination of federal actions. ( a ) The Commission shall determine whether any Commission proposal: ( 1 ) Is categorically excluded from preparation of either an EA or an EIS;
( 2 ) Requires preparation of an EA; or
( 3 ) Requires preparation of an EIS.
( b ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the Commission may prepare a NEPA document to assist any Commission action at any time in order to further the purposes of NEPA. This NEPA document may be done to analyze the consequences of ongoing Commission activities, to support Commission planning, to assess the need for mitigation, to disclose fully the potential environmental consequences of Commission actions, or for any other reason. Documents prepared under this paragraph shall be prepared in the same manner as Commission documents prepared under this part.
§ 98.32 Parental complaints. The State shall: ( a ) Establish or designate a hotline or similar reporting process for parents to submit complaints about child care providers;
( b ) Maintain a record of substantiated parent complains;
( c ) Make information regarding such parental complaints available to the public on request; and
( d ) The Lead Agency shall provide a detailed description in the Plan of how: ( 1 ) Complaints are substantiated and responded to, including whether or not the State uses monitoring as part of its process for responding to complaints for both CCDF and non-CCDF providers; and,
( 2 ) A record of substantiated complaints is maintained and is made available.
[81 FR 67581, Sept. 30, 2016]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The MONY Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Daddario, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY Group Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    RICHARD DADDARIO
|                       
|Richard Daddario       



August 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The MONY Group Inc. and will be retained by The MONY
Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 3046
- 3047
- 3048
- 3049
- 3050
- 3051
- 3052
- 3053
- 3054
- 3055
- 3056
- 3057
#### § 108.651 Portable magazine chests.

Each portable magazine chest must be marked: “PORTABLE MAGAZINE CHEST—FLAMMABLE—KEEP LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY” in letters at least 7.5 centimeters (3 inches) high.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5125-N-03]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 19, 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been detemined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: January 11, 2007.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 07-140 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
#### § 630.665 State.

*State* means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
1

Rule 219. Annual Registration of Attorneys

(a) Every attorney admitted to practice law in this Commonwealth shall pay an 

annual fee of [$125.00]$120.00 and electronically file the annual fee form provided for in 

this rule by July 1. The fee shall be collected under the supervision of the Attorney 

Registration Office, which shall make the annual fee form available for filing through a 

link on the Board’s website (http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org) or directly at 

https://ujsportal.pacourts.us. The said fee shall be used to defray the costs of 

disciplinary administration and enforcement under these rules, and for such other 

purposes as the Board shall, with the approval of the Supreme Court, from time to time 

determine. Upon an attorney’s written request submitted to the Attorney Registration 

Office and for good cause shown, the Attorney Registration Office shall grant an 

exemption from the electronic filing requirement and permit the attorney to file the annual 

fee form in paper form. 

*****

(j) ***

(1) An inactive attorney under this subdivision (j) shall continue to file the 

annual form required by subdivision (d), shall file the form through the 

online system identified in subdivision (a), and shall pay an annual fee of 

[$70.00]$100.00 in the manner provided in subdivision (d)(2). 

Noncompliance with this provision will result in the inactive attorney 

incurring late payment penalties, incurring a collection fee for any check 

in payment that has been returned to the Board unpaid, and being placed 

on administrative suspension pursuant to and in accordance with the 

provisions of subdivision (f) of this rule. 

 *****
2

Rule 502. Pennsylvania Lawyers Fund for Client Security

*****

(b) Additional fee. Every attorney who is required to pay an active annual fee under 

Rule 219 (relating to annual registration of attorneys) shall pay an additional annual fee 

of [$45.00]$75.00 for use by the Fund. Such additional fee shall be added to, and 

collected with and in the same manner as, the basic annual fee. All amounts received 

pursuant to this subdivision shall be credited to the Fund. 

*****
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Mike 

Bishop for Congress 

) 

) A17-04 

) 

) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on June 12,2018, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Mike Bishop for 

Congress, as recommended in the Memorandum fix>m the Chief Compliance 

Officer and Audit Division dated June 7,2018. 

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively 

for the decision. 

Attest: 

CTkht. /3.zg/y 

Date Dayna C. Brown 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to Delete a System of Records. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Logistics Agency is deleting a system of records notice to its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This action will be effective without further notice on April 30, 2007, unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DP, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Defense Logistics Agency notices for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The specific changes to the record system being amended are set forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its entirety. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: March 26, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## Deletion

## S322.20

### System name:

Recruitment Eligibility File (November 16, 2004, 69 FR 67112).

*Reason:*                         Records previously collected and maintained under this system of records were incorporated into S322.50, Defense Edibility Records last published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 8, 2007, at 72 FR 730.                    

[FR Doc. 07-1560 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Order entered May 1, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00038-CV

BASIL BROWN, Appellant

V.

ROBERT HAWKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16C-0127

ORDER

Appellant has been declared a vexatious litigant and is required to obtain permission from the 

local administrative judge to file this appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103(a). 

After granting appellant two extensions, the Court received a copy of the March 22, 2019 order of the 

Honorable Carter Thompson, Local Administrative Judge in Dallas County. By order dated March 

27, 2019, we acknowledged receipt of the March 22nd order and set the deadline for the reporter’s 

record. After appellee objected to this Court’s March 27th order asserting that appellant had to 

obtain permission from the local administrative judge of Kaufman County, we vacated that order on 

April 17, 2019 and ordered appellant to file, by May 7, 2019, a copy of an order from the local 

administrative judge of Kaufman County permitting the filing of this appeal.
Before the Court is appellant’s objection to this Court’s April 17th order. Appellant asserts, 

among other things, that the order he obtained from Judge Thompson was proper. Appellant further 

asserts that, before appellant had an opportunity to request permission from the Kaufman County 

local administrative judge, counsel for appellee filed an untruthful letter with that judge urging him 

to deny permission to file the appeal.

After reviewing appellant’s objection, we extend the deadline for appellant to comply with 

this Court’s April 17th order to May 28, 2019. If the local administrative judge of Kaufman County 

signs an order denying appellant permission to appeal, appellant may apply for a writ of mandamus 

with this Court not later than the thirtieth day after the date of the order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(f).

The deadline for the reporter’s record remains suspended. It will be reset if appellant 

complies with this order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable B. 

Michael Chitty, Presiding Judge of the 422nd Judicial District Court; Shelly Etheridge, Official Court 

Reporter for County Court at Law No. 1; and all parties

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
#### § 400.41 Definitions

For purposes of this subpart—

*Applicant for asylum* means an individual who has applied for, but has not been granted, asylum under section 208 of the Act.

*Asylee* means an individual who has been granted asylum under section 208 of the Act.
#### §§ 86.43-86.50 [Reserved]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8078** 

LARRY DEAN LOWRY , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. SANDRA F. THOMAS, Superintendent , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00362

- RJC )

Submitted : February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Larry Dean Lowry, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Dean Lowry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c )(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the dis trict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
W e have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lowry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 111.60-1 Construction and testing of cable. ( a ) Electric cables constructed of stranded copper conductors, thermoplastic, elastomeric or other insulation, moisture-resistant jackets, and, where applicable, armoring and outer-sheathing must meet all the requirements of IEC 60092-350:2014, 60092-352:2005, 60092-353:2016, 60092-354:2014, 60092-360:2014, IEC/TR 60092-370:2009, 60092-376:2017, IEEE 1580, ANSI/UL 1072, ANSI/UL 1309, or MIL-DTL-24640C or MIL-DTL-24643C (all incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter), including the respective flammability tests contained therein.
( b ) IEC 60092 series cable must meet the Category A or A F/R flammability requirements of IEC 60332-3-22:2009 or 60332-3-21:2000 (both incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).
[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16363, Mar. 16, 2023]