alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Project Background:

For years, an approximately 26-acre area located between downtown Sioux Falls and Falls Park (a recreational 

city park) had been passed over for redevelopment due to contamination uncertainties. The property had 

been used for more than a half-century for lead-acid battery storage and scrap metal salvaging, and included 

a rail yard and a roundhouse. An EPA Brownfields Assessment Pilot awarded to Sioux Falls in 1996 confirmed 

the presence of heavy metals and organic chemicals, and helped the city to resolve land acquisition issues and 

develop a cleanup plan.

key accomPlishments:

•	 Performed a detailed environmental investigation of the entire

project area through the Assessment Pilot and Showcase 

Community Funding.

•	 Assisted the city in resolving land acquisition issues and in

developing and implementing a cleanup plan.

•	 Leveraged a more than $900,000 cleanup effort that involved the

removal of contaminated soil and capping of selected areas.

outcome:

Modifications to newly-expanded Falls Park continue as part of the Falls Park Masterplan and most recently 

included the completion of a decorate archway, gazebos, an outdoor sculpture garden, and additional 

landscaping. Two declining historic warehouse buildings were rehabilitated in anticipate of the city’s “Phillips 

to the Falls” project, and since then four additional historic buildings have been rehabilitated with the intent of 

additional private development occurring. The revitalization generated by this project has increased retail and 

office uses in the north end of Sioux Falls’ downtown district. 

Former Industrial Corridor Transformed into 

a Recreational Centerpiece for the City of Sioux Falls

brownfields

at-a-glance

PhilliPs To The falls sioux falls, south Dakota

Assessment and Cleanup Grants

EPA-560-F-10-225

July 2010

for More inforMaTion: Visit the EPA Brownfields Web site at http://www.epa.gov/brownfields or call EPA Region 8 at (303) 312-6803

The City of Sioux Falls received a $200,000 Brownfields

Assessment grant in 1996, a $200,000 Showcase Community

Finalist award, and a $200,000 Brownfields Cleanup grant in 2004.

South Dakota Department 

of Environment and 

Natural Resources

address: General industrial corridor, north of downtown Sioux Falls, SD

ProPerty size: 26 acres

Former uses: Scrap metal salvage, rail, lead-acid battery storage, 

miscellaneous industry

current uses: A recreational city park and updated transportation corridor

ePa grant reciPient: Project Partners:

Falls Park was expanded all the way to 

downtown Sioux Falls through this project.

For additional data and geographic information for this and 

other Brownfields Grants, please visit ePa’s Cleanups in 

My Community - http://iaspub.epa.gov/Cleanups/
150°0'0"W

150°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

60°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

Figure 17. Alternative C - Airplane Access

to Lakes in Designated Wilderness

South of the Sterling Highway

Produced in the Division of Realty

and Natural Resources

Anchorage, Alaska

Current to: February 28, 2008

Kenai

NWR

Anchorage

Map

Extent

0 2.5 5 10

Miles

08-0062 JGB

Note: This map does not address land ownership.

0 3.5 7 14

Kilometers

Soldotna

Cooper Landing

Skilak Lake

Kachemak

Bay

Lower Russian

Lake

Upper Russian Lake

Pothole Lake

East & West Twin Lakes

Harvey Lake

Fox Lake

Point Lake

Tustumena Lake

Nikolai

Lake

Iceberg Lake

Green Lake

High Lake

Windy Lake

North & South

Kolomin Lakes

Four Unnamed Lakes in

T. 1 S., R. 9 W., Sec. 4-9

Two Unnamed Lakes in

T. 1 S., R. 10 W., Sec. 1-2

Dinglestadt Glacier

Terminus Lake

Martin Lake

Emerald Lake

Wosnesenski Glacier

Terminus Lake

Sterling Highway

Unnamed Lake southwest

of Goat Lake Sec. 28

Open

Early Access

Change from Alternative A

Andrew Simons Wilderness Area

Mystery Creek Wilderness Area

Refuge Boundary
§ 11.416 Service requirements for mate of near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 1,600 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as mate of near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 1,600 GRT is 2 years of total service in the deck department of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled, sail, or auxiliary sail vessels. Service on Great Lakes and inland waters may substitute for up to 1 year of the required service. One year of the required service must have been on vessels of more than 100 GRT. Six months of the required service must have been while performing bridge watchkeeping duties under the supervision of the master or a qualified officer.
( b ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to § 11.309 of this part.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14815-14816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Population Health and 
Clinical Care Connections Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 15th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Population Health and Clinical Care Connections 
Workgroup [formerly Biosurveillance Workgroup] in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

[[Page 14816]]


DATES: April 20, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), Room 505A (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/population/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue deliberation on 
response management. The meeting will include testimony on 
Communications, and Countermeasure Allocation, Distribution and 
Administration tracking during a public health response.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/population/pop_instruct.html.

    Dated: March 22, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-1540 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 11.405 Service requirements for chief mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as chief mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage is 1 year of service as officer in charge of a navigational watch on ocean self-propelled vessels while holding a license or MMC endorsement as second mate.
( b ) Service towards an oceans, near-coastal, or STCW endorsement will be credited as follows: ( 1 ) Service on the Great Lakes will be credited on a day-for-day basis.
( 2 ) Service on inland waters, other than Great Lakes, that are navigable waters of the United States, may be substituted for up to 50 percent of the total required service.
( 3 ) Service on vessels to which STCW applies, whether inland or coastwise, will be credited on a day-for-day basis.
( c ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to § 11.307 of this part.
---

Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC"), formerly
 Integrated  Performance Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
 April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we the undersigned officers of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: June 14, 2007 | /s/    BRAD JACOBY     
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Brad Jacoby            
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |                        
|Date: June 14, 2007 | /s/    BRAD J. PETERS  
|                    | Brad J. Peters         
|                    | Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51409

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

DAWN MARIE COBB, KENNETH RYAN HAMANN

Defendants - Appellants

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-141-2

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury found that Dawn Marie Cobb and Kenneth Ryan Hamann,

aided and abetted by each other, possessed equipment, chemicals,

products and materials used to manufacture methamphetamine and

opened, used, and maintained a place for the purpose of

manufacturing, distributing, and using methamphetamine. A jury

also found that Harmann attempted to manufacture methamphetamine. 

Both Cobb and Harmann challenge the sufficiency of the evidence

supporting their convictions, having adequately preserved their
No. 04-51409

-2-

challenge in district court. See United States v. Resio-Trejo,

45 F.3d 907, 911 n.6 (5th Cir. 1995)

Viewing the evidence produced at trial in the light most

favorable to the verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have

found that the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt

Cobb’s and Hamann’s guilt as to each of the charged offenses. 

See United States v. Villarreal, 324 F.3d 319, 322 (5th Cir.

2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 22, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-14635

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D. C. Docket No. 03-01669-CV-TWT-1

JOHN T. AMEND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

485 PROPERTIES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(March 22, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges*.

PER CURIAM:

____________________

*This decision is rendered by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
2

The facts and procedural background of this case are set forth in Amend v.

485 Properties, LLC, 401 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2005). In that opinion, we

dismissed Amend’s contract claim and reserved ruling on his quantum meruit

claim for brokerage services provided to WorkPlace USA, Inc. as agent for 485

Properties, LLC.

Subsequently, because we concluded that the issue of whether “procuring

cause” is an element of a quantum meruit claim under Georgia law is not clear, we

certified the following question to the Georgia Supreme Court: Whether procuring

cause is an element of a quantum meruit claim under Georgia law. See Amend v.

485 Properties, LLC., 409 F.3d 1288, 1289 (11th Cir. 2005).

On March 13, 2006, the Georgia Supreme Court answered our certified

question in the affirmative. Accordingly, based on our prior decisions entered in

this case and based on the Georgia Supreme Court’s answer to our certified

question attached hereto as an “Appendix,” we affirm the district court’s grant of

summary judgment on Amend’s quantum meruit claim.

AFFIRMED.
3
§ 108.217 Guardrails and bulwarks. ( a ) Each unit must have guardrails or bulwarks along the edge of the bridge, of each deck, and of each deck opening.
( b ) Each guardrail and bulwark must extend at least one meter (39.37 inches) above the deck except where this height may interfere with the normal operation of the unit, a lesser height may be approved.
( c ) Removable guardrails may be installed where operating conditions warrant their use.
§ 11.217 Examination procedures and denial of officer endorsements. ( a ) The examination fee set out in Table 1 to § 10.219(a) of this subchapter must be paid before the applicant may take the first examination section. If an applicant fails three or more sections of the examination, a complete re-examination must be taken. On the subsequent exam, if the applicant again fails three or more sections, at least 3 months must elapse before another complete examination is attempted, and a new examination fee is required. If an applicant fails one or two sections of an examination, the applicant may be retested twice on these sections during the next 3 months. If the applicant does not successfully complete these sections within the 3-month period, a complete re-examination must be taken at least 3 months from the date of the last retest, and a new examination fee is required. The 3-month retest period may be extended by the Coast Guard if the applicant presents evidence documenting sea time that prevented the taking of a retest during the 3-month period. The retest period may not be extended beyond 7 months from the initial examination. All examinations and retests must be completed within 1 year of approval for examination.
( b ) If the Coast Guard refuses to grant an applicant the endorsement applied for due to the applicant's failure to pass a required examination, the Coast Guard will provide the applicant with a written statement setting forth the portions of the examination that must be retaken and the date by which the examination must be completed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report
of World Energy Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard Domaleski, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:
      March 3, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Richard DomaleskiRichard
      DomaleskiChief
      Executive Officer







A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
§ 91.49 Alternate funds disbursal procedure. ( a ) When HHS withholds funds from a recipient under these regulations, the Secretary may disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient: any public or non-profit private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( b ) The Secretary will require any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( 1 ) The ability to comply with these regulations; and
( 2 ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
[47 FR 57858, Dec. 28, 1982, as amended at 70 FR 24322, May 9, 2005]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**Certification
      of**


**Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer**


**of
      Buckeye Ventures, Inc. Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




This
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-KSB
      (the “Form 10-KSB”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, of Buckeye
      Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Henry S. Leonard, Vice President
      Finance and Chief Accounting Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer, of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Form
      10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB
      pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
      of
      the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
      registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.




Date:
                April 15, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Henry S. LeonardHenry
                S. LeonardVice President Finance and Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)
# C_2008069EN.01000601.xml

| 14.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 69/04)

| Aid No | XS 31/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Comunitat Valenciana |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Ayudas RURALTER-PAISAJE |
| Legal basis | Orden de convocatoria de ayudas para la ejecución de la Estrategia para los Territorios Rurales Valencianos RURALTER-PAISAJE |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 7,3 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Objective | Small and medium-sized enterprises |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Consellería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación de la Generalit |
| C/Amadeo de Saboya, 2 |
| E-46010 Valencia |

Aid No

XS 31/08

Member State

Spain

Region

Comunitat Valenciana

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Ayudas RURALTER-PAISAJE

Legal basis

Orden de convocatoria de ayudas para la ejecución de la Estrategia para los Territorios Rurales Valencianos RURALTER-PAISAJE

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 7,3 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(6) and 5 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2008

Duration

31.12.2013

Objective

Small and medium-sized enterprises

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Name and address of the granting authority

Consellería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación de la Generalit

C/Amadeo de Saboya, 2

E-46010 Valencia

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection  with the Annual Report of Pure Bioscience (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Michael L. Krall, Chief Executive Officer certify,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

October 29, 2003              /s/ Michael L. Krall
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Michael L. Krall
                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the c ourt has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50783 Summary Calendar

UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS
RUBEN ENRIQUEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CR-365) July 1, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The Appellant, Ruben Enriquez-Hernandez ("Enriquez") appeals
his conviction for possession of marijuana. Enriquez contends that

there was not sufficient evidence for the jury to find that he knew

that marijuana was hidden in the truck he drove. We have reviewed

the briefs and the record, and conc lude that the record is not devoid of evidence that Enriquez knew the marijuana was hidden in

the car. S ee United States v. Pierre , 958 F.2d 1304, 1310-11 (5thCir. 1992) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 111.87-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to electrically energized units or panels for heating a room or compartment. This subpart does not apply to electrically energized units for heating the air in an enclosed apparatus, such as a motor or controller.
From: Jan Miller

To: (KUCC), Salmon, Lydia; wleipold@phelpsdodge.com

Date: 7/25/03 1:42PM

Subject: RE: RE: Kennecott numbers

 Based on these numbers and your phone message, it sounds like we should 

use the 97-98 average of 340,269 for KUC's input sulfur. I will inform Lily 

Wong at Region 9. 

>>> "Salmon, Lydia (KUCC)" <salmonl@kennecott.com> 07/25/03 10:35AM >>>

Jan,

Going by Wayne's responmse, you should either use the 1996-1998 average or the

1997-1998 average, depending on whether 1996 operation at KUC is considered 

sufficiently abnormal to exclude it. Here are those averages:

Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter Sulfur Input (1996 - 2002)

Concentrate Feed Annual 1996-8 Avg 1997-8 Avg

Smelted(1) Sulfur(2) Input Sulfur Input Sulfur Input Sulfur

Year (tons/year) (%) (tons/year) (tons/year) (tons/year)

1996 669,868 31.22% 209,113

1997 1,040,792 30.77% 320,220

1998 1,188,500 30.32% 360,318 296,550 340,269

1999 1,174,060 29.17% 342,438

2000 1,181,776 30.76% 363,562

2001 1,074,743 29.85% 320,811

2002 1,208,121 29.52% 356,637

(1) Figures from Annual Reports

(2) Average of analysis of monthly composite samples

Lydia S. Salmon

KUCC

-----Original Message-----

From: Jan Miller [mailto:JANMILLER@utah.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:55 PM

To: Salmon, Lydia (KUCC)

Subject: Fwd: RE: Kennecott numbers

 Lydia, here's Wayne's response to my inquiry. I'm out the door til

Friday, so you can let me know then what you want me to do. 

 Thanks.