alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                             CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
                       STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                         NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
                        (unaudited, dollars in thousands)


<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
Earnings:
   Loss before income taxes                   $(1,365,594)
   Add: Fixed charges, net
     of capitalized interest                       38,250
                                              -----------

                                              $(1,327,344)
                                              ===========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                           $    23,065
   Amortized debt issuance costs                    8,257
   Interest portion of rental expense               6,928
                                              -----------

                                              $    38,250
                                              ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     --(1)
                                              ===========
</TABLE>


(1) For the nine months ended June 30, 2001, the Company had a deficiency of
    earnings compared to its fixed charges of $1.4 billion.
§ 411.111 Frequency and scope of audits. ( a ) Within three years of February 22, 2016, each care provider facility that houses UCs will be audited at least once; and during each three-year period thereafter.
( b ) ORR may expedite an audit if it believes that a particular care provider facility may be experiencing problems related to sexual abuse or sexual harassment.
( c ) ORR must develop and issue an instrument that is coordinated with the HHS Office of the Inspector General that will provide guidance on the conduct and contents of the audit.
( d ) The auditor must review all relevant ORR-wide policies, procedures, reports, internal and external audits, and licensing requirements for each care provider facility type.
( e ) The audits must review, at a minimum, a sampling of relevant documents and other records and other information for the most recent one-year period.
( f ) The auditor must have access to, and must observe, all areas of the audited care provider facilities.
( g ) ORR and the care provider facility must provide the auditor with the relevant documentation to complete a thorough audit of the care provider facility.
( h ) The auditor must retain and preserve all documentation (including, e.g., videotapes and interview notes) relied upon in making audit determinations. Such documentation must be provided to ORR upon request.
( i ) The auditor must interview a representative sample of UCs and staff, and the care provider facility must make space available suitable for such interviews.
( j ) The auditor must review a sampling of any available video footage and other electronically available data that may be relevant to the provisions being audited.
( k ) The auditor must be permitted to conduct private interviews with UCs.
( l ) UCs must be permitted to send confidential information or correspondence to the auditor.
( m ) Auditors must attempt to solicit input from community-based or victim advocates who may have insight into relevant conditions in the care provider facility.
( n ) All sensitive and confidential information provided to auditors will include appropriate designations and limitations on further dissemination. Auditors must follow appropriate procedures for handling and safeguarding such information.
( o ) Care provider facilities bear the affirmative burden on demonstrating compliance with the standards to the auditor.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                       BANC  OF  AMERICA  SPECIALTY FINANCE, INC.
                           ANNUAL OFFICER CERTIFICATE

                       NationsCredit Grantor Trust 1996-1



The  undersigned certifies that he is a Senior Vice President of Banc of America
Specialty  Finance,  Inc.  formerly  NationsCredit Distribution Finance, Inc., a
Georgia  corporation (the "Servicer"), and that as such he is duly authorized to
execute  and  deliver  this  certificate  on  behalf of the Servicer pursuant to
Section  13.10  of  the  Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 31,
1996  among  NationsCredit  Securitization Corporation, NationsCredit Commercial
Corporation  and  Bankers  Trust Company (the 'Agreement') and further certifies
that  ( i ) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period January
1,  2000  up to and including December 31, 2000 and of its performance under the
Agreement  has  been  made  and  (ii)  based  on  such  review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the past year up
to  and  including  December  31,  2000.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  have affixed hereto my signature this the 27th day of
                                                                    ----
March,  2001.

                                   Banc  of  America  Specialty  Finance,  Inc.



                                   By  /s/  CHRISTOPHER  SPOENEMAN
                                       ---------------------------
                                            Christopher  Spoeneman
                                            Senior Vice President



                                   Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SYLVESTER BOSTON JR.,

Defendant-Petitioner.

 /

Case No. 14-20383-2

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds 

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion and order denying Petitioner’s motion

to vacate, set aside or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF no. 374), Petitioner’s

motion is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: January 12, 2021

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on January 12, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Bartlett

Case Manager

Case 2:14-cr-20383-NGE-RSW ECF No. 422, PageID.3507 Filed 01/12/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:14-cr-20383-NGE-RSW ECF No. 422, PageID.3508 Filed 01/12/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 12

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph Albagli, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F of
VocalTec Communications Ltd.; and

     2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amendment
No. 1.

Date: May 16, 2006

By: /s/ Joseph Albagli
Joseph Albagli
Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Rafael Wiesler, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F of
VocalTec Communications Ltd.; and

     2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amendment
No. 1.

Date: May 16, 2006

By: /s/ Rafael Wiesler
Rafael Wiesler
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Corey James Bravo v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00923-CR

Trial court case number: 1788210

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on December 19, 2012. In the order 

of abatement, we ordered the trial court to execute an amended certification of appellant’s right 

to appeal, to determine whether appellant still wishes to appeal, to determine if appellant is 

indigent, and, if appellant is not indigent, to admonish appellant regarding self-representation 

and either determine that appellant is knowingly and intelligently waiving his right to counsel or 

set a deadline for appellant to hire counsel. On January 14, 2013, the trial court held a hearing 

on our order. The supplemental clerk’s record, filed January 15, 2013, contains a certification of 

the right to appeal indicating that appellant has the right to appeal. The reporter’s record of the 

hearing, filed January 16, 2013, shows that appellant wishes to pursue this appeal, that the trial 

court determined that appellant is not indigent, that appellant was admonished regarding selfrepresentation, and that appellant wishes to represent himself.

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 23, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,176
<SECURITIES>                                     5,029
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       325
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,924
<PP&E>                                           6,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,374
<BONDS>                                            262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,421
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 411<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (596)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
<FN>
<F1>INTEREST INCOME
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TRACY CHILDRESS,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 14-12399

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

________________________________/

JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Court’s Order entered on September 30, 2015; 

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan on September 30, 2015.

David J. Weaver

Clerk of the Court

Approved:

 BY: /s/ Linda Vertriest

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

2:14-cv-12399-VAR-APP Doc # 18 Filed 09/30/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 948
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.115 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) The standards referred to in this subchapter are incorporated by reference. The incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register under the provisions of 1 CFR Part 51 on November 7, 1978.
( b ) The standards are on file in the Federal Register library and are available from the appropriate organizations whose addresses are listed below: ( 1 ) American Bureau of Shipping, ABS Plaza, 16855 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060.
( 2 ) American National Standards Institute Standards (ANSIS), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) International, Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.
( 3 ) American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20005-4070.
( 4 ) International Cargo Gear Bureau, Inc., 321 West 44th Street, New York, New York 10036, on the Internet at *http://www.icgb.com .*
( 5 ) National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269-9101.
( 6 ) Underwriters Laboratories, 12 Laboratory Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3995.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 107.115, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
#### § 111.60-7 Demand loads.

Generator, feeder, and bus-tie cables must be selected on the basis of a computed load of not less than the demand load given in Table 111.60-7.

| Type of circuit | Demand load |
| --- | --- |
| Generator Cables | 115 percent of continuous generator rating. |
| Switchboard bus-ties, except ship's service to emergency switchboard bus-ties | 75 percent of generating capacity of the larger switchboard. |
| Emergency switchboard bus-ties | 115 percent of continuous rating of emergency generator. |
| Motor feeders | Article 430 of NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter). |
| Galley equipment feeders | 100 percent of either the first 50 kW or one-half the connected load, whichever is the larger, plus 65 percent of the remaining connected load, plus 50 percent of the rating of the spare switches or circuit breakers on the distribution panel. |
| Lighting feeders | 100 percent of the connected load plus the average active circuit load for the spare switches or circuit breakers on the distribution panels. |
| Grounded neutral of a dual voltage feeders | 100 percent of the capacity of the ungrounded conductors when grounded neutral is not protected by a circuit breaker overcurrent trip, or not less than 50 percent of the capacity of the ungrounded conductors when the grounded neutral is protected by a circuit breaker overcurrent trip or overcurrent alarm. |

Table 1 to § 111.60-7—Demand Loads

[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58348, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65198, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16364, Mar. 16, 2023]
|                                                           |   | Exhibit                21.1      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| **PowerCerv                Corporation**                       |
|                                                           |   |                             |
| **List                of Subsidiaries**                        |
|                                                           |   |                             |
| The                subsidiary of the Registrant is as follows: |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |
| PowerCerv                Technologies Corporation              |   | Organized                in U.S. |
|                                                           |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |
|                                                           |   |                             |

----
#### § 75.426 Bad debts.

Bad debts (debts which have been determined to be uncollectable), including losses (whether actual or estimated) arising from uncollectable accounts and other claims, are unallowable. Related collection costs, and related legal costs, arising from such debts after they have been determined to be uncollectable are also unallowable. See also § 75.428.
§ 2555.405 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than that provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) ( i ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( A ) Proportionate in quantity; and
( B ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( ii ) A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person that provides all or part of such housing to students of only one sex.
#### § 670.16 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, that a meeting of the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory Council will be held Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 9 a.m. until 3:30 p.m., at the Lowndes County Interpretive Center located at 7001 Highway 80 West Hayneville Alabama. The Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory Council was established pursuant to Public Law 100-192 establishing the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail. This Council was established to advise the National Park Service on such issues as preservation of trail routes and features, public use, standards for posting and maintaining trail markers, and administrative matters.

*The matters to be discussed include:*

(A) Welcome New Members.

(B) Walk thru Lowndes County IC.

(C) Update on other Interpretive Sites.

The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and space for accommodating members of the public are limited and persons will be accommodated on first come, first serve basis. Anyone may file a written statement with Catherine F. Light, Trail Superintendent concerning the matters to be discussed.

Person wishing further information concerning this meeting may contact Catherine F. Light, Trail Superintendent, Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail, at 334-727-6390 (phone), 334-727-4597 (fax) or mail 1212 Old Montgomery Road, Tuskegee Institute, Alabama 36088.

Catherine F. Light,

Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Superintendent.

[FR Doc. 06-9890 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-04-M
§ 84.60 Children, parents, caregivers, foster parents, and prospective parents in the child welfare system. ( a ) *Discriminatory actions prohibited.* ( 1 ) No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any child welfare program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance.
( 2 ) Under the prohibition set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, discrimination includes: ( i ) Decisions based on speculation, stereotypes, or generalizations that a parent, caregiver, foster parent, or prospective parent, because of a disability, cannot safely care for a child; and
( ii ) Decisions based on speculation, stereotypes, or generalizations about a child with a disability.
( b ) *Additional prohibitions.* The prohibitions in paragraph (a) of this section apply to actions by a recipient of Federal financial assistance made directly or through contracts, agreements, or other arrangements, including any action to: ( 1 ) Deny a qualified parent with a disability custody or control of, or visitation to, a child;
( 2 ) Deny a qualified parent with a disability an opportunity to participate in or benefit from any and all services provided by a child welfare agency, including but not limited to, family preservation and reunification services equal to that afforded to persons without disabilities;
( 3 ) Terminate the parental rights or legal guardianship of a qualified individual with a disability;
( 4 ) Deny a qualified caregiver, foster parent, companion, or prospective parent with a disability the opportunity to participate in or benefit from child welfare programs and activities; or
( 5 ) Require children, on the basis on the disability, to be placed outside the family home through custody relinquishment, voluntary placement, or other forfeiture of parental rights in order to receive necessary services.
( c ) *Parenting evaluation procedures.* A recipient to which this subpart applies shall establish procedures for referring to qualified professionals for evaluation those individuals, who, because of disability, need or are believed to need adapted services or reasonable modifications. A recipient shall also ensure that tests, assessments, and other evaluation tools and materials used for the purpose of assessing or evaluating parenting ability are based in evidence or research, are conducted by a qualified professional and are tailored to assess actual parenting ability and specific areas of disability-related needs. Parenting evaluations must be fully accessible to people with disabilities and shall not be based on a single general intelligence quotient or measure of the person's disability, rather than their parenting ability. Assessments of parents or children must be individualized and based on the best available objective evidence.
[89 FR 40188, May 9, 2024]