alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip NavigationEn Español

You are here:                Home » Disorders A - Z » Autism »             

# Autism Fact Sheet

Skip secondary menu

Home

Disorders A - Z

Information Page

Publications

Organizations

News

Research literature

Other related groupsOrganizationsProfessional SocietiesGovernment Resources

NINDS Clinical Trials

En EspañolOrder Brochures

News From NINDS

Recovery Act

Funding Information

Training & Career Awards

Diversity Programs

Research Programs

Find People

About NINDS

 

Email this pagePrint-friendly versionContact NINDS

----

Adobe ReaderMicrosoft Word Viewer

**Clinical Trials**

                    - 
                    - 

**Buspirone in the Treatment of 2-6 Year Old Children with Autistic Disorder (B-ACE)**

More Information »See All Trials »

See a list of all NINDS Disorders

Get Web page suited for printing                              			Email this to a friend or colleague                              			                              			Request free mailed brochure                              		Autismo

## Table of Contents (click to jump to sections)
§ 689.5 Initial NSF handling of misconduct matters. ( a ) NSF staff who learn of alleged misconduct will promptly and discreetly inform OIG or refer informants to OIG.
( b ) The identity of informants who wish to remain anonymous will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law or regulation.
( c ) If OIG determines that alleged research misconduct involves potential civil or criminal violations, OIG may refer the matter to the Department of Justice.
( d ) Otherwise OIG may: ( 1 ) Inform the awardee institution of the alleged research misconduct and encourage it to undertake an inquiry;
( 2 ) Defer to inquiries or investigations of the awardee institution or of another Federal agency; or
( 3 ) At any time proceed with its own inquiry.
( e ) If OIG proceeds with its own inquiry it will normally complete the inquiry no more than 90 days after initiating it.
( f ) On the basis of what it learns from an inquiry and in consultation as appropriate with other NSF offices, OIG will decide whether a formal NSF investigation is warranted.
From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:48 PM

To: undisclosed

‐ recipients Subject: Clarifications on Testing 114 Request

A question arose about the "Other Information" column for Speciated Volatile organic HAP testing and the addition of the 4 m^3 per test requirement. This is an error, please strike that requirement. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks

Table 1.3. Summary of Test Methods and Altern ative Methods for Orga nic HAP from Thermal

Chip Dryers and Scrap Dryers/Delacquering Ki lns/ Decoating Kilns at Secondary Aluminum Production Facilities

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243-02 Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207 Email: bo y d.rochelle @ epa. g ov Pollutant Recommended Method Alternative Method Other Information Target Reported Units

of Measure a
Speciated Volatile organic HAP b SW-846 Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8620B, collect a minimum of four sets of adsorb ent traps over a 2 hour period per test run. c U.S. EPA Method 320, sample at least 1 hour per test run c

, target an in-stack concentration
detection level of < 25 ppbv. Three test runs; minimum 4 m^3
per test kg/hr and kg/Mg of feed/charge Pa g e 1 of 1

1/10/2012 mhtml:file://\\ rtifile02.rcc

_ nt.rti.or g \ehe\Pro j ects\0210426-EPA

_ SPPD _( O p t4 ) \0210426.00

...
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-EMX7 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.
   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
   Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1890 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to increase the percentage of State 

revolving loan funds reserved for American Samoa, the Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, and 

Mr. SABLAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to increase the 

percentage of State revolving loan funds reserved for 

American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATE REVOLVING LOAN FUNDS FOR AMER4 ICAN SAMOA, NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, 

5 GUAM, AND THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

6 Subsection (j) of section 1452 of the Safe Drinking 

7 Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘The total allotment of grants’’ and all that follows 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1890 IH

1 through the period and inserting ‘‘The total allotment of 

2 grants under this section for American Samoa, the Com3 monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and 

4 the Virgin Islands in any fiscal year shall be 0.5 percent 

5 of the aggregate amount made available to carry out this 

6 section in that fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# TERRY 

# D

# I<OVAC Small Business Services: accounting, raxe<c. loetn rreparation &. consulting Personal Services: fiiVtncidl, taxes &. generai consulting 

### and Associates, Inc The firm that cares about "you"

July 15, 2011 Assistant Secretary ofAviation Affairs U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, DC (jl '_:._,·_,' RE: DeKalb Taylor Municipal Airport Application for "GrantAssistance" underthe Small CommJnlty Air Service Development Program: Docket:DOT-OST-2011-0119. Dear Sir or Madam; Our company supports DeKalb Taylor Municipal Airports application forthe above "Grant Assistance." Our company has been based at DeKalb forthe last fouryears. We moved to DeKalb from Schaumberg Municipal Airport. The reason forour move was due to the unfriendlyenvironment at Schaumburg, the one runway limitation and the lack ofan ILS landing system. Although DeKalb is father from ouroffice and my residence than Schaumburg we decided to move our base ofoperation. We talked toThe Airport ManagerTom Cleveland and he made us feel at home and truly wanted us to be partofthe DeKalb Airport family. Based on thatvisit we decided that DeKalb Airport would be our home base ofoperation. DeKalb also has two runways and would be installing an ILS 

### & GPS landing systems in the nearfuture. As ofthis writingthat has been accomplished. Our company's use ofthe airport is both business and recreational. We have clients in the surrounding contiguous states and in Florida. In ouropinion the $40,000.00 Grant would help promote the growth ofthe airport, create jobs and increase revenues forthe community. The DeKalb area has been targeted by the national Grocery store chain Hy-Vee that opened a store in May2011. We have also seen interest by other large corporations. The airport has sufficient run way length to accommodate corporatejets and other aircraft. We have some companies receiving and sending expedited freight through air charter. Our airport manage Tom Cleveland is the perfect individual to promote the airport. His primary focus is the growth ofthe airport and improving its services. He truly has the future of DeKalb Taylor Municipal Airport as his primary focus.

-------------------------- 1970 Larkin Avenue Elgin. !llinoi'> 60123 Office: (847) 622-0899 Fax: (847) 622- 0898We have the facility and all the players in position forexpansion. However we need the funds to accomplish ourgoals. We ask you to give priority consideration tothe DeKalb Taylor Municipal Airports application underthe "Small Community Service Development Program) Docket: DOT-OPST-2011-0119. Thank you for allowing us to express ouropinion.
Keith Bentley, Chief 

Air Protection Branch 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

HAR 2 6 2014 

Environmental Protection Division 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, Georgia 30354 

Dear Mr. Bentley: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management 

Division (APTMD) conducted an end-of-year evaluation of the Performance Partnership Grant's (PPG) 

associated fiscal year (FY) 2013 section 105 commitments in the Air Planning Agreement (AP A). This 

letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations 3 5.115. 

There was one work plan activity within the FY 2013 AP A that your agency did not commit to 

completing due to resource constraints, although this was acknowledged as an activity the EPA has 

requested state programs to commit to undertake as part ofthe APA. The EPA is highlighting below as 

an outstanding concern given the nature and importance of the activities independent of any 

commitment on your part to complete the activities: 

Due to budget constraints, the GA EPD has discontinued program activities associated with 

implementation of the Asbestos National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) program. The components that are discontinued are the Asbestos NESHAP 

inspections, complaint follow-up, and enforcement. The EPA assumed responsibilities for 

implementation of those program duties to fulfill our responsibilities under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). At this time, the EPA has not made any determination regarding the impact of 

discontinuing implementation of the specified program activities on the Asbestos NESHAP 

program delegation or the CAA Section 105 grant. 

Region 4 appreciates the progress made in FY 2013 and we look forward to continuing our joint efforts 

to protect and improve air quality with you and your staff on these issues. If you have any questions 

regarding your grant, please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Mary Echols at (404) 562-9053. 

Sincerely, 

~IJ.fl~ fpz 

GreggM.W~ Chief 

Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch 

Air, Pesticides, and Toxics 

Management Division 

Internet Address (URL)'i' http:/fwww.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
Reader’s Guide for Triphenyltin Hydroxide (TPTH)

CRM: Susan Bartow

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to TPTH Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0413

Publication Date: December 19, 2012

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various entries c ontained in the fipronil docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened

for Review and Comment and Other Docket Actions.

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the TPTH Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0413.

Docket Item 3. Triphenyltin Hydroxide (TPTH) Preliminary Work Plan Registration Review:

Initial Docket. Case Number 99. December 2012

.

Human Health Documents fo r Registration Review

Docket Item 4. TPTH (Triphenyltin Hydroxide). H ealth Effects Division (HED) Scoping Document for Registration Review. December 4, 2012.

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to support the registration review of TPTH.

Docket Item 5. TPTH (Fentin Hydroxide): Review of Human Incidents . July 19, 2012.

This report represents human health incidents oc curring in the United States from for the single chemical, TPTH, only.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. Registration Review: Preliminary Problem Formulation for Environmental Fate, Ecological Risk Endangered Species, and Human Health Drinking Water Exposure Assessments for Triphenyltin Hydroxide (TPTH). November 29, 2012.

This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and characterizing the ecological risks.Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 7. BEAD Chemical Profile for Registra tion Review: Triphenyltin Hydroxide (TPTH) also known as Fentin H ydroxide (083601). June 25, 2012.

This document provides usage information and an overview of the pest management role of

TPTH.

Docket Item 8. PRD Label Data Report: Food/F eed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review Work Planning. Fentin hydroxide / TPTH (083601). June 14, 2012.

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/non- feed uses for TPTH.
§ 108.477 Fire hydrants. ( a ) If a fixed foam extinguishing system has outlets in a main machinery space, at least 2 fire hydrants, in addition to the fire hydrants required by § 108.423 of this subpart, must be installed outside the entrances to the space with each at a separate entrance.
( b ) Each hydrant must have enough hose to spray any part of the space.
( c ) Each hydrant must have a combination nozzle and applicator.
#### § 111.108-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to MODUs, floating OCS facilities, and vessels, other than offshore supply vessels regulated under 46 CFR subchapter L of this chapter, constructed after April 2, 2018 that engage in OCS activities.

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16368, Mar. 16, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Cr. No. 14-cr-20446

v.

Hon. Robert H. Cleland

KHALIL HADDAD, 

 

Defendant.

 /

APPLICATION FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES

On July 30, 2014, Khalil Haddad was charged with Government Program

Fraud. See Indictment, R. 1, Pg ID 1-2. On September 4, 2014, Haddad was

found to be indigent and the court appointed the Federal Defender Office pursuant

to the Criminal Justice Act. See Appointment Order, R. 10, Pg ID 18. Mr.

Haddad resides in Buda, Texas. On Monday, December 19th, 2014, Mr. Haddad

will need to be in Court here in the Eastern District of Michigan for a 3:30 p.m.

hearing. Counsel would also like to consult with the defendant for at least one

hour prior to the hearing. As a result, the defendant respectfully requests that this

Honorable Court order the U.S. Marshal to furnish him with non-custodial

transportation to and from Buda, Texas to Detroit, Michigan (round-trip) for

purposes of appearing in Court on Friday, December 19th.

2:14-cr-20446-RHC-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 12/10/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 38
Respectfully submitted,

s/Todd Shanker

 Counsel for Khalil Haddad

613 Abbott, 5th floor

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 967-5879

December 9, 2014 email: todd_shanker@fd.org

2:14-cr-20446-RHC-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 12/10/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 39
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Cr. No. 14-cr-20446

v.

Hon. Robert H. Cleland

KHALIL HADDAD, 

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES

Upon the application of Defendant, Khalil Haddad, for Travel Expenses,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4285, and the Court being apprised of Defendant's

indigence; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal furnish Defendant

Khalil Haddad with non-custodial transportation to and from Buda, Texas to

Detroit, Michigan (round trip) for purposes of appearing in Court on the afternoon

of Friday, December 19th for consultation with counsel and for a hearing before

the Honorable Judge Robert H. Cleland.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

 HONORABLE ROBERT H. CLELAND

United States District Judge

Entered: December 10, 2014 

2:14-cr-20446-RHC-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 12/10/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 40
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KISOR , ATTANASIO , and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Calvin F. KNAIDE VI Private (E

- 1 ), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 20 2400224

_________________________
Decided: 11 September 2024
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Aran T. Walsh
Sentence adjudged 14 March 2024 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : confinement for 33 months and a dishonorable discharge

. For Appellant: Captain Katharine K. McCormick , JAGC, USNUnited States v. Knaide , NMCCA No. 2 02400224 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________
This opini on does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________

PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correctin law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHRIS RUFER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:14-cv-00837 (CRC)

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION AND

CLARIFICATION OF DENIAL OF MOTION FOR THREE-JUDGE PANEL

Plaintiffs allege that barring political parties from accepting unlimited contributions to 

fund non-coordinated campaign expenditures violates the First Amendment. On August 19, 

2014, the Court ruled that Plaintiffs lack standing to assert these claims before a three-judge 

district court pursuant to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (“BCRA”), Pub. L. No. 

107–155, 116 Stat. 81. Instead, because redressing Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries would require 

overturning portions of the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”), 52 U.S.C. § 30101-46 

(formerly 2 U.S.C. §§ 431-57), their constitutional questions must be certified to the D.C. Circuit 

sitting en banc under 2 U.S.C. § 437h. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial reconsideration 

and for clarification of the Court’s order. They argue that the standing issues that bar them from 

bringing their challenge a three-judge court equally prevent them from proceeding under section 

437h because portions of both BCRA and FECA must be overturned for Plaintiffs to obtain 

relief. They urge the Court to therefore ignore the standing defects and convene a three-judge 

district court. They also ask the Court to clarify the effect of its decision on the state political 

parties that are plaintiffs in this action, as state parties cannot pursue claims via section 437h. 

Case 1:14-cv-00837-CRC Document 25 Filed 09/22/14 Page 1 of 2
A motion to reconsider is disfavored and will be granted only if the “moving party 

presents new facts or a clear error of law which ‘compel’ a change in the court’s ruling[.]” State 

of N.Y. v. United States, 880 F. Supp. 37, 39 (D.D.C. 1995) (collecting cases). It is not “a 

second opportunity to present argument upon which the Court has already ruled.” Niedermeier v. 

Office of Baucus, 153 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2001). The Article III standing issues that 

prevent Plaintiffs from proceeding via BCRA § 437h are not implicated by certifying questions to 

the D.C. Circuit, as the district court—which ultimately retains jurisdiction over the case after 

certification, see, e.g., In re Cao, 619 F.3d 410, 435 (5th Cir. 2010)—has jurisdiction to 

adjudicate claims under the Constitution and federal laws generally. As stated in the Certification 

Order, the claims of the state parties will be stayed pending the decision of the en banc D.C. 

Circuit. Accordingly it is hereby 

ORDERED that [ECF No. 23] Plaintiffs’ motion for partial reconsideration and for 

clarification is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: September 22, 2014

Case 1:14-cv-00837-CRC Document 25 Filed 09/22/14 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTAITILED PR 06-0544 IN RE PETITION OF KAREN A. HAMMEL FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

### NOV 0 2 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf hAnntana ORDER

Karen A. Hammel has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana. Hammel was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31, 2021. Hammel has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Hammel has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 13 of the CLE Rules. The Petition states that Hammel is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules ofProfessional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofKaren A. Hammel for reinstatement toactive status inthe StateBarofMontana isGRANTED. Upon payment ofany remaining dues, fees, and the state license taxto the State Bar ofMontana,Munson shallbe reinstated. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this ?....-

'- 41ay ofNovember, 2021. 11/02/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544

# . 1iAi,t.11, Justices

2