alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Andriy Volianuk, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Nova Mining Corporation (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/ Andriy Volianuk        
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | ANDRIY VOLIANUK            
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | March 18, 2009             

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of PAETEC Holding Corp., hereby certifies that, on
the date hereof:

1. the annual report on Form 10-K/A of PAETEC Holding Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed
on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
PAETEC Holding Corp.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 12, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    ARUNAS A.
CHESONIS                                   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Arunas A. Chesonis                                          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 12, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    KEITH M. WILSON                                      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Keith M. Wilson                                             
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MORRIS WEATHERSPOON,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 14-12758

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

UNKNOWN KILARU, ET AL,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION (DOC. #51)

AND DISMISSING REMAINDER OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

On August 7, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Clarification of Court Order Doc.

#50 (Doc. #51). 

Previously, the Court Granted Defendants’ Gee and Barry’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. # 41 ). It construed Plaintiff’s Motions (Doc. #47) and (Doc. #41) as

motions for reconsideration. The Court denied them in an Order entered July 21, 2015

(Doc. #50).

The Court speaks through its orders and has no intention of clarifying Doc. #50.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification is DENIED.

Also, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause (Doc. #44) why the remaining

Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff responded on July

2, 2015 (Doc. #49).

Plaintiff fails to show cause for his failure to move his case along.

The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claims against Kilaru, Powell, Wagner, Handley

and Shook.

2:14-cv-12758-VAR-DRG Doc # 52 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 227
This order closes this case.

IT IS ORDERED.

S/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: August 24, 2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record and Morris Weatherspoon by

electronic means or U.S. Mail on August 24,

2015.

S/Carol A. Pinegar 

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-12758-VAR-DRG Doc # 52 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 228
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-48 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# Iluiteb -'Qtate5 Court of Zipplat5 for 

# tbe jfeberat Circuit

CAPTAIN ROSS E. JOSLYN, 

### Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES, 

### Defendant-Appellee.

2010-5080

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 08- CV -925, 

### Chief Judge Emily C. Hewitt.

ON MOTION

Before R ADER, 

### Chief Judge. ORDER Captain Ross E. Joslyn moves for a 14-day extension of time, until July 20, 2010, to file his opening brief. Joslyn states that the United States consents. On June 21, 2010, the day his brief was due, Joslyn moved for an extension of time to file his brief. In that motion, Joslyn stated that he sought a 60-day extension ofJOSLYN v. US 2

time; however, the revised due date that Joslyn requested was July 6, 2010, only 15 days after the existing due date. On June 28, 2010, the court granted Joslyn's motion for an extension of time, until July 6, to file his brief. In the order granting the extension of time, the court indicated that no further extensions would be granted. When the court states "no further extensions," it means it. These words are not lightly or routinely added to orders. Counsel for Joslyn fails to acknowledge in the current motion that the court indicated that no further extensions would be granted. In addition, the court notes that Joslyn's motion was filed on July 6, the date his brief was due. Because the motion was not filed at least seven days before the date sought to be extended and is not accompanied by an affidavit or declaration describing extraordinary circumstances that prevented him from filing a timely motion, it does not comply with Fed. Cir. R.26(b). Joslyn's prior extension motion also failed to comply with Rule 26(b). Nevertheless, because it appears that in his prior motion Joslyn attempted to seek a 60-day extension of time, the court grants a short additional extension of time. Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. Joslyn's brief is due within 14 days of the date of filing of this order. If the brief is not filed within that time, the appeal will be dismissed. No further extensions of time will be granted.3 JOSLYN v. US

FOR THE COURT 

## JUL 2 8 2010
Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Michael D.J. Eisenberg, Esq. James P. Connor, Esq.
s17 FID U.S. cou R v L 

### F AP EALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 

# 2 8 Z010

JAN HORBALY CLERK
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


International Trade Administration
�MDBU�*ERR01*�MDNM�
U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board: 
Meeting of the U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board (Board) will hold a 
meeting to discuss topics related to the travel and tourism industry. 
The Board was established on October 1, 2003, and reconstituted October 
1, 2005, to advise the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to the 
travel and tourism industry.

DATES: January 30, 2007. Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: 1401 Constitution Avenue, Department of Commerce, 
Washington, DC. This program will be physically accessible to people 
with disabilities. Seating is limited and will be on a first-come, 
first-served basis. Requests for sign language interpretation, other 
auxiliary aids, or pre-registration, should be submitted no later than 
January 22, 2007, to Jessica Arnold, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory 
Board, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 
telephone 202-482-4501, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ec4ebfdfde7edefa0cffce0e1e2eacee3efe7e2a0eae1eda0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0aa859393898381cea1928e8f8c84a08d81898cce848f83ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Arnold, U.S. Travel and 
Tourism Advisory Board, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 202-482-4501, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dc7e8fefee4eeeca3ccffe3e2e1e9cde0ece4e1a3e9e2eea3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2f8d7c1c1dbd1d39cf3c0dcddded6f2dfd3dbde9cd6ddd19cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 11, 2007.
Jessica Arnold,
Executive Secretary, U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board.
[FR Doc. 07-136 Filed 1-11-07; 2:27 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

| NAME                                  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| AvTel Holdings, Inc.                  | California                    |
| CW Electronic Enterprises, Inc.       | Illinois                      |
| Digital Media International, Inc.     | Pennsylvania                  |
| DNS Communications, Inc.              | Texas                         |
| NetLojix Telecom, Inc.           | Delaware                      |
| Remote Lojix/PCSI, Inc.          | NewYork                       |
| Remote Lojix of Connecticut, Inc.     | Connecticut                   |
| Remote Lojix Technology Partners,Inc. | NewYork                       |
| Smith Technology Solutions, Inc.      | California                    |
| Westnet Communications, Inc.     | California                    |
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                */s/                Edward J. Lawson*     |                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| **Edward                J. Lawson, Chief Executive Officer** | **November                14, 2006** |
|                                                         |                                 |
|                                                         |                                 |

----
§ 111.60-4 Minimum cable conductor size. Each cable conductor must be 18 AWG (0.82 mm2) or larger except— ( a ) Each power and lighting cable conductor must be 14 AWG (2.10 mm2) or larger; and
( b ) Each thermocouple, pyrometer, or instrumentation cable conductor must be 22 AWG (0.33 mm2) or larger.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28280, June 4, 1996, as amended by USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16363, Mar. 16, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1686]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Board on Medical 
Rehabilitation Research.
    Date: May 3-4, 2007.
    Time: May 3, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: NICHD Director's Report presentation, NCMRR Director's 
Report presentation and various reports on Medical Research 
Initiatives.
    Place: William F. Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Potomac, 
MD 20854.
    Time: May 4, 2007, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: Other business dealing with the NABMRR Board.
    Place: William F. Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Potomac, 
MD 20854.
    Contact Person: Ralph M. Nitkin, PhD, Director, BSCD, National 
Center for Medical, Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Building, Room 2A03, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-4206.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/ncmrr.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1686 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
~ 

, Wqr 

Spokane 

Regional (' Clea n Ai rAgency 

3104 E. Augusta Avenue. Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 477-4727 ♦ Fax (509) 477-6828 ♦ www.SpokaneCleanAir.org 

June 22, 2015 

Kate Kelly, Director 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 6th Ave., Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Dear Ms. Kelly: 

In response to your request, I am writing to confirm that the Spol<ane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA) 

Regulation 1, Article VIII, Solid Fuel Burning Device Standards, as amended on July 10, 2014, contains a 

continuous emission limitation, consistent with Federal Clean Air Act requirements and the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy regarding excess emissions during start-up, shut-down 

and malfunction (or upset) conditions. 

Regulation 1, Article VIII, section 8.05 prohibits emissions from any solid fuel burning device to exceed 

an average of twenty percent opacity for six consecutive minutes in any one-hour period. Emissions 

created during the starting of a new fire for a period not to exceed twenty minutes in any four-hour 

period are not subject to this opacity limit. However, other requirements of the rule apply to solid fuel 

burning devices at all times, including during startup. Section 8.06 prohibits the burning of fuel wood 

that is not seasoned. Section 8.03 defines "seasoned wood" as "wood of any species that has been 

sufficiently dried so as to contain twenty percent or less moisture by weight." In addition, section 8.06 

prohibits at all times burning garbage and other specific materials that would increase emissions. These 

fuel restrictions constitute work practice requirements that limit emissions during startup conditions. 

Regulation 1, Article VIII thus includes limits on emissions that apply during all modes of source 

operation and imposes continuous emission controls on solid fuel burning devices consistent with the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act applicable to State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions. Accordingly, 

Regulation 1, Article VIII creates no exemptions for emissions during any mode of source operation 

(including startup, shutdown or malfunction/upset conditions). 

Sincerely, 

Julie Oliver 

Executive Director 

C: Correspondence file 

SFBD SIP file 

Joanna Ekrem, Ecology- AQP 

working with you for clean air 

® contains 30% post-consunier wasle
§ 900.104 Federal and intergovernmental relationships. The Denali Commission was created to deliver the services of the federal government in the most cost-effective manner practicable. In order to reduce administrative and overhead costs, the Commission partners with federal, state and local agencies and Alaska Native villages and commonly depends on these governmental agencies for project management. Consequently, the Commission generally relies on the expertise and processes already in use by partnering agencies to help prepare Commission NEPA analyses and documents. ( a ) With federal partners, the Commission will work as either a joint lead agency (40 CFR 1501.5 and 1508.16) or cooperating agency (40 CFR 1501.6 and 1508.5). The Commission may invite other Federal agencies to serve as the lead agency, a joint lead agency, or as a cooperating agency.
( b ) Consistent with 40 CFR 1508.5, the Commission will typically invite Alaska Native villages and state and local government partners to serve as cooperating agencies.
( c ) Requests for the Commission to serve as a lead agency (40 CFR 1501.5(d)), for CEQ to determine which Federal agency shall be the lead agency (40 CFR 1501.5(e)), or for the Commission to serve as a cooperating agency (40 CFR 1501.6(a)(1)) shall be mailed to the Commission office.
#### Mason v. Wells.

*Joinder of parties*— *nonjoinder may be set wp in answer.*

The non-joinder of a person jointly liable with a defendant in an action may be set up in an answer, and if then established, is a perfect defense. *Wooster v. Chamberlain,*28 Barb. 602; *Scout*v. *Tuttle,*14 N. Y. 468.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the complaint entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought by Amanda T. Mason against Austin L. Wells, to recover damages for a neglect to keep in life certain policies of insurance on plaintiff’s house.

*H. C. Kingsbury,*for appellant.

*C. D. Murray,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The head-note states the only point passed upon in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
**21** **st** **Century Holding Company**




**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21 st Century
      Holding Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James G. Jennings, III,
      Chief Financial Officer of 21 st Century
      Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of 21 st Century
      Holding Company.





By: 
                /*s/
                James G. Jennings, III***James
                G. Jennings, III, Chief Financial
                Officer**
            
            
            **May 10, 2007**
- 2327
- 2328
#### Thomas R. Dawley, *Appellant, v.*Daniel Alsdorf, *Respondent*.

Motion denied. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.