alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

77581 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 248 

Wednesday, December 27, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–6 of December 6, 2006 

Presidential Determination on Waiver of Conditions on Obligations and Expenditure of Funds for Planning, Design, and 

Construction of a Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility in 

Russia for Calendar Year 2007 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 1303 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375) (the 

‘‘Act’’), I hereby certify that waiving the conditions described in section 

1305 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public 

Law 106–65), as amended, is important to the national security interests 

of the United States, and include herein, for submission to the Congress, 

the statement, justification, and plan described in section 1303 of the Act. 

This waiver shall apply for calendar year 2007. 

You are authorized and directed to transmit this certification, including 

the statement, justification, and plan, to the Congress and to arrange for 

the publication of this certification in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 6, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 06–9913 

Filed 12–26–06; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PRESDOCSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BOCA STEL 2, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and 

PABLO MENDEZ, DISCOVER BANK, MARIA MENDEZ a/k/a MARIA 

VERONICA MENDEZ, UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESSION OF THE 

SUBJECT PROPERTY,

Appellees.

No. 4D14-3869

[October 7, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Judy Biebel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2012CA018024XXXXMB.

Brian M. Becher of Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Gora, P.A., Boca 

Raton, for appellant.

Wm. David Newman, Jr. of Choice Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., National Association.

On Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Boca Stel 2, LLC, appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion 

to quash service of process and to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Appellee 

concedes that the affidavit of constructive service of process was deficient 

and that the summons should be quashed. See Gans v. HeathgateSunflower Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 593 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

We therefore reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to

quash the summons and for further proceedings consistent with this 

opinion.

Reversed and remanded.
2

GROSS, TAYLOR, and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation November 24, 2015

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. Exemption No. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) request amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 11467, 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 for the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. In addition to 

the DJI S1000, DJI S900, DJI S800, and Ready Copter, AIR wishes to add the EZ-Rig, a proprietary 

design, to its exemption grant, with the authority to operate with a tethered line attached to the UA. AIR 

wishes to use the Naza-M V2 flight controller with this system. 

For your ease in reviewing this request for amendment, please refer to the exhibit list which 

begins on page 2. Information relating to the proprietary design of the EZ Rig is being submitted 

confidentially. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §11.35, AIR request confidential treatment for information 

regarding the EZ-Rig, submitted as Exhibit 1. Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. requests that the 

information contained in that exhibit not be made public because there are trade secrets that would harm 

the owner of the information. It contains valuable commercial data that is not publicly available and is 

protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4).

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503-312-9804 or via email at

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com.

Thank you,

 Drew Pairamore 

 Director of Regulatory Compliance

 Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.
2

Table of Contents

EZ Rig Exhibits

Exhibit 1: EZ Rig Specifications ..............................Submitted confidentially to the FAA 

Exhibit 2: Futaba 14 SG User Manual ..................... Uploaded separately due to size constraints 

Exhibit 3: DJI 2.4g Bluetooth Datalink............... Uploaded separately due to size constraints

Flight Controller Exhibits

Exhibit 4: DJI Naza M V2 User Manual.............. Uploaded separately due to size constraints

Exhibit 1 has been submitted confidentially to the FAA and is not available to thepublic.
3

Exhibit 1: EZ Rig Specifications

The EZ Rig is a proprietary design. Documentation regarding this UA has been 

submitted as Exhibit 2 and is not available to the public.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flexxtech Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
A. Novielli, Chairman, CEO & CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                  /s/ Michael A. Novielli
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael A. Novielli
                                  Chairman, CEO & CFO

Dated: May 20, 2003
#### § 81.34 Service—how made.

Service shall be made by personal delivery of one copy to each person to be served or by mailing by first-class mail, properly addressed with postage prepaid. When a party or amicus has appeared by attorney or other representative, service upon such attorney or representative will be deemed service upon the party or amicus. Documents served by mail preferably should be mailed in sufficient time to reach the addressee by the date on which the original is due to be filed, and should be air mailed if the addressee is more than 300 miles distant.
2:14-mj-30379-DUTY Doc # 9 Filed 09/04/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 30
# Senate Floor Activity - Tuesday, July 22, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Tuesday, July 22)

S. 2569

S.Res. 510

## Executive Business (Tuesday, July 22)

PN1476

 235

 238

PN1516

 236

 239

PN1551

 234

 237

PN1696

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### GUISEPPE GUARINO, PETITIONER, v. NEWARK PARAFFINE AND PARCHMENT PAPER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Eor the petitioner, *David, Roskein.*

Eor the respondent, *Richard, W. Baker.*

The petitioner testified on his own behalf and also called to testify Dr. ICeppler, Dr. Ereedman and Dr. Shapiro. On behalf of the respondent, Drs. Lowenstein, Eoth, Griffith and Euoff testified and it was stipulated and agreed that the onfy question involved in this case was the extent of temporary and permanent disability, it being admitted that the petitioner received an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on April 15th, 1927, and that his wages were $24 per week.

After reviewing the testimony in this case I am of the opinion that the estimate of permanent disability given by Drs. Keppler and Shapiro were high in that their estimates were made on the basis of the petitioner’s being unable to flex ox extend his ann because of the injury to the elbow, claiming that the same was due to a bony and a fibrous com- . position at the joint. It was later shown, however, that there was no bon}*- or fibrous composition which prevented the flexing or extending of the arm, as twice under an anaesthetic, as testified bjr Drs. Lowenstein and Eoth, the petitioner’s arm ivas easily flexed and extended to its full extent.

*697After carefully considering the testimony in this case I hereby find and determine that the petitioner is entitled to receive teuiporary compensation from the date of the accident up to and including November 4th, a period of twenty-nine weeks, at the compensation rate of $16 per week, of which a period of nine weeks has already been paid, the balance of twenty weeks at the compensation rate of $16 per week is due and owing and is to he paid to the petitioner in a lump sum, upon the signing of this order.

I further find that the petitioner is entitled to an award for permanent disability based upon twenty per cent, permanent loss of the right arm, being forty weeks at the compensation rate of $16 per week, all of which has been duly paid by the respondent.

It is further ordered that the respondent shall pay the sum of $75 for medical testimony rendered in the above case and the petitioner shall pay the balance herein.

It is further ordered that David Eoskein, attorney for the petitioner, shall be entitled to a counsel fee of $50, which shall be paid by the petitioner.

Habby J. Goas, *Deputy Commissioner.*
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERICA GRANT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4318

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 22, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. 

Fernandez, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Keith W. Upson, Special Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
§ 117.207 Survival craft—vessels operating on lakes, bays, and sounds routes. ( a ) Each vessel with overnight accommodations certificated to operate on a lakes, bays, and sounds route must be provided with inflatable buoyant apparatus of an aggregate capacity that will accommodate at least 67% of the total number of overnight persons permitted on board.
( b ) Where the total number of persons allowed on the COI exceeds the total number of overnight persons allowed, the following survival craft requirements apply when not engaged in an overnight voyage: ( 1 ) If operated in cold water, be provided with life floats of an aggregate capacity that will accommodate at least 100% of the total number of persons permitted on board; or
( 2 ) If operated in warm water, be provided with life floats of an aggregate capacity that will accommodate at least 50% of the total number of persons permitted on board.
( c ) Except as allowed by paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, each vessel without overnight accommodations certificated to operate on a lakes, bays, and sounds route must: ( 1 ) If operated in cold water, be provided with life floats of an aggregate capacity that will accommodate at least 100% of the total number of persons permitted on board; or
( 2 ) If operated in warm water, be provided with life floats of an aggregate capacity that will accommodate at least 50% of the total number of persons permitted on board.
( d ) Each vessel certificated to operate on a lakes, bays, and sounds route within one mile of land is not required to carry survival craft.
( e ) For a vessel certificated to operate on a lakes, bays, and sounds route in shallow water where the vessel can not sink deep enough to submerge the topmost passenger deck or where survivors can wade ashore, the cognizant OCMI may waive a requirement for survival craft, if the OCMI determines that it is safe to do so, taking into consideration the vessel's scope of operation, hazards of the route, and availability of assistance.
( f ) Each vessel operating with a set schedule on a specific route that does not take it more than 20 nautical miles from a harbor of safe refuge, and that maintains a 15 minute radio communications schedule with an operations base, or participates in a Vessel Traffic Service (VTS), may be granted a reduction in the survival craft requirements of this section if the cognizant OCMI is satisfied that a sufficient level of safety exists.
§ 109.415 Retention of records after casualty. ( a ) The owner, agent, master, or person in charge of a unit for which a report of casualty is made under § 109.411 shall insure that all records maintained on the unit are retained on board the unit for at least 3 months after the report of casualty is made or until advised by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, that records need not be retained on board.
( b ) The records which must be retained in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section include: ( 1 ) Rough and smooth deck log.
( 2 ) Rough and smooth engine room log.
( 3 ) Tour reports.
( 4 ) Bell books.
( 5 ) Navigation charts in use at the time of casualty.
( 6 ) Navigation work books.
( 7 ) Compass deviation cards.
( 8 ) Gyrocompass records.
( 9 ) Storage plans.
( 10 ) Record of drafts.
( 11 ) Notices to mariners.
( 12 ) Radiograms sent and received.
( 13 ) The radio log.
( 14 ) Personnel list.
( 15 ) Crane record book.
( c ) The owner, agent, master, or person in charge shall, upon request, make the records described in this section available for examination by any Coast Guard official authorized to investigate the casualty.
#### § 87.4 Severability.

To the extent that any provision of this part is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Department intends for all other provisions that are capable of operating in the absence of the specific provision that has been invalidated to remain in effect.

[89 FR 15723, Mar. 4, 2024]
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Krall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Pure Bioscience;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
         is being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of the end of the period (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  December 22, 2003


/s/ Michael L. Krall
--------------------
Michael L. Krall
President/CEO


<PAGE>
§ 11.407 Service requirements for third mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage. ( a ) The minimum service or training required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as third mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage is— ( 1 ) Three years of service in the deck department on ocean self-propelled vessels, with a minimum of 6 months of bridge watchkeeping duties under the supervision of the master or a qualified officer. Experience gained in the engine department on vessels of appropriate tonnage may be creditable for up to 3 months of the service requirements for this officer endorsement;
( 2 ) Graduation from— ( i ) The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy (deck curriculum);
( ii ) The U.S. Coast Guard Academy with qualification as an underway officer in charge of a navigational watch, underway officer of the deck, or deck watch officer;
( iii ) The U.S. Naval Academy with qualification as an underway officer in charge of a navigational watch, underway officer of the deck or deck watch officer; or
( iv ) The deck class of a maritime academy approved by and conducted under rules prescribed by the Maritime Administrator and listed in part 310 of this title, including the ocean option program in the deck class of the Great Lakes Maritime Academy; or
( 3 ) Satisfactory completion of a comprehensive apprentice mate training program approved by the Coast Guard.
( b ) Graduation from the deck class of the Great Lakes Maritime Academy will qualify the graduate to be examined for an endorsement as third mate self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage with a route appropriate to the program completed.
( c ) While holding a license or MMC endorsement as master of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 1,600 GRT, 1 year of service as master on vessels of more than 200 GRT operating on ocean or near-coastal waters will qualify the applicant for an endorsement as third mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage.
( d ) An individual holding an endorsement or license as mate of Great Lakes and inland, self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage, or master of inland, self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage, may obtain an endorsement as third mate of oceans or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of unlimited tonnage by completing the prescribed examination in subpart I of this part.
( e ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to § 11.309 of this part.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 17

- 2255

___________

JAMILA RUSSELL; L.T.

v.

SUPERIOR COURT MARSHAL CHRISTOPHER RICHARDSON,

IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY;

GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN

ISLANDS

*Superior Court of the Virgin Islands,

Superior Court Marshal Christopher Richardson,

in his individual and official capacity,

Appellants

____________________________________

On Appeal from the District Court

of the Virgin Islands

(D.V.I. Civ. No. 1

- 15

- cv

- 00049 )

Honorable Anne E. Thompson , U.S. District Judge

____________________________________

Argued: May 22, 2018

Before: KRAUSE

, ROT H, and FISHER, Circuit Judges

___________

JUDGMENT

___________

This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District

Court for the Virgin Islands and was argued on May 22, 2018 . Because proceedings in

the District Court have continued during the pendency of this appeal, we find that the

interests of the parties and the public a re best served by issuing our judgment promptly.2

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this

Court that the judgment of th e District Court entered on May 16, 2017, be and the same is

hereby AFFIRMED in all respects except as to Appellees’ gross negligence claim, on

which point it is REVERSED. A formal o pinion will follow. The time for filing a

petition for rehearing shall r un from th e date that the Court’s formal o pinion is entered on

the docket. Costs taxed against the Appellants.

By the Court,

s/ Cheryl Ann Krause

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Dated: July 18, 2018