alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CSI Business Finance, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:July 25, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Wm
                Chris MathersName:
            Wm
                Chris MathersTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to CSI Business Finance, Inc. and will be
      retained CSI Business Finance, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




-
          21
          -
#### Anna M. Dominick, *Appellant, v.*Augustus A. Leverich, *Respondent*.

Issues of fact ordered to be framed and tried by a jury at a circuit (Part 2) to be held in this county in the month of May, 1882. Order to be settled by Brady, J. (See opinion *Per Curiam.)*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CARLYLE GREEN
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2572

[ September 25, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562007CF004356A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant Carlyle Green previously pled no contest to home invasion robbery with a firearm while wearing a mask

. H e was adjudicated guil t y and sentenced to fifteen years in prison with a ten

- year mandatory

minimum , followed by f ive years of probation. Appellant was later charged with violating his probation by tampering with evidence

. After a revocation hearing, the trial court adjudicated A ppellant guilty of violating probation

. The trial court sentenced Appellant to 200 months in prison, followed by

tw o years of community c ontrol, followed by five years of probation. Appellant challenges this judgment and sentence. We affirm in all respects except for the written judgment , which we remand for correction of a

scrivener’s error.

The written judgment entered in this case contains a scrivener’s error erroneously showing that A ppellant admitted the violation of probation.

However

, A ppellant contested the violation

, and after a revocation hearing,

the trial court found he violated his probation

. We remand with directions

to correct the scrivener’s error. See Widel v. State , 120 So. 3d 68, 69 (Fla.2 4th DCA 2013) ; Sirota v. State , 977 So. 2d 700 , 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Appellant need not be present for this correction.

Affirmed ; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ERBER and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Balkcom *v.*The State.

Submitted October 16,

Decided November 8, 1906.

Accusation of adultery. Before Judge Hodges. .City court of Macon. June 29, 1906.

*Nottingham, & McClellan*and *8. W.*Hatcher, for plaintiff in error. *William*Brunson, solicitor-general, contra.

Beck, J.

There being evidence sufficient to authorize the verdict, and no errors of law being complained of, the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial is

*Affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 2785.

#### R. A. Jester *v.*The State.

1. Petit Jury.—A constitutional jury for the trial of causes in the district court consists of twelve persons.

3. Burglary—Theft—Indictment.—The charging clause of the indictment, in alleging the burglarious entry, as copied into the record, reads as follows: “ Then and there by force break and enter a house,” etc.,— omitting the essential word “did.” *Held*that, if the said word is omitted in the original indictment, it is insufficient to charge burglary. Appearing, however, in the proper connection in the clause charging theft of certain articles the indictment is sufficient as an indictment for theft.

Appeal from the District Court of Rockwall. Tried below before the Hon. Anson Rainey.

The conviction was for burglary, and the penalty assessed was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

The disposition made of the appeal does not necessitate a statement of the evidence as adduced on the trial.

*L. D. Stroud*and *J. H. Smith,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

It appears from the record that the defendant was tried by a jury of *six*men. Such trial was not in accordance with law, and the conviction must be set aside. (Const., art. 5, sec. 13; Code Crim. Proc., art. *595;*Rich v. The State, 1 Texas Ct. App., 206; Huebner v. The State, 3 Texas Ct. App., 458; Marks v. The State, 10 Texas Ct. App., 334.) This error in the conviction is confessed by the Assistant Attorney General.

In the indictment, as it appears in the record, there is a fatal defect, in so far as it undertakes to charge burglary. It alleges that the defendant “then and there, by force, break and enter a house,” etc., omitting the essential word “did.” If guch *370omission be in tbe original indictment, a conviction for said offense can not be sustained upon it. (Walker v. The State, 9 Texas Ct. App., 177; Moore v. The State, 7 Texas Ct. App., 42.) The indictment, however, is a good one for the offense of theft. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion delivered November 3, 1888.

*Reversed and remanded,*
#### § 81.103 Exceptions to initial or recommended decisions.

Within 20 days after the mailing of an initial or recommended decision, any party may file exceptions to the decision, stating reasons therefor, with the reviewing authority. Any other party may file a response thereto within 30 days after the mailing of the decision. Upon the filing of such exceptions, the reviewing authority shall review the decision and issue its own decision thereon.
EXHIBIT 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 2-0-27648, 333-100120, 333-10648, 333-106400 and
333-131870) pertaining to the VocalTec Communications Ltd. (the "Company") 1996
Stock Option Plan and Incentive Plan, 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, 1998
and 1999 Stock Option Plan and Incentive Plan and Amended 2003 Master Stock
Option Plan of our report dated April 18, 2006 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005,
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2005, filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.



Tel Aviv, Israel                                KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
April 20, 2006                                  A Member of Ernst & Young Global
# CE2009286EN.01006301.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/63

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008Veterinary checks in intra-Community trade (codified version) *

P6_TA(2008)0271

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 June 2008 on the proposal for a Council directive concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade (codified version) (COM(2008)0099 — C6-0135/2008 — 2008/0037(CNS))

2009/C 286 E/23

(Consultation procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2008)0099),

having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0135/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1)

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0243/2008),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
§ 63.3 Program announcements and solicitations. ( a ) In each fiscal year the Assistant Secretary may from time to time solicit applications through one or more general or specialized program announcements. Such announcements will be published in the Federal Register as notices and will include: ( 1 ) A clear statement of the type(s) of applications requested;
( 2 ) A specified plan, time(s) of application, and criteria for reviewing and approving applications;
( 3 ) Any grant terms or conditions of general applicability (other than those set forth in this part) which are necessary ( i ) to meet the statutory requirements of applicable legislation,
( ii ) to assure or protect the advancement of the project, or
( iii ) to conserve grant funds.
( b ) Applications for grants: Any applicant eligible for grant assistance may submit on or before such cutoff date or dates as the Assistant Secretary may announce in program solicitations, an application containing such pertinent information and in accordance with the forms and instructions as prescribed herein and additional forms and instructions as may be specified by the Assistant Secretary. Such application shall be executed by the applicant or an official or representative of the applicant duly authorized to make such application. The Assistant Secretary may require any party eligible for assistance under this subchapter to submit a preliminary proposal for review and approval prior to the acceptance of an application submitted under these provisions.
( c ) All applications and preliminary proposals should be addressed to:
Grants Officer, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 5027, Washington, DC 20201.
§ 2555.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
§ 400.115 Establishing legal responsibility. ( a ) A State must ensure that legal responsibility is established, including legal custody and/or guardianship, as appropriate, in accordance with applicable State law, for each unaccompanied minor who resettles in the State. The State must initiate procedures for establishing legal responsibility for the minor, with an appropriate court (if action by a court is required by State law), within 30 days after the minor arrives at the location of resettlement.
( b ) In establishing legal responsibility, including legal custody and/or guardianship under State law, as appropriate, the minor's natural parents should not be contacted in their native country since contact could be dangerous to the parents.
( c ) Unaccompanied minors are not generally eligible for adoption since family reunification is the objective of the program. In certain rare cases, adoption may be permitted pursuant to adoption laws in the State of resettlement, provided a court finds that: ( 1 ) Adoption would be in the best interest of the child; and
( 2 ) there is termination of parental rights (for example, in situations where the parents are dead or are missing and presumed dead) as determined by the appropriate State court. When adoption occurs, the child's status as an unaccompanied minor terminates.
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Prygelski, III, Chief
Financial Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      21st
      Century Holding
Company.





By:  /s/ Peter J. Prygelski,
      IIIPeter
      J. Prygelski, III, Chief Financial Officer
                  August
      10, 2009
# 2016 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
lH NMR in DMSO **~Mri~OOmN O~~~**  **~MNOm~~ m~~MNrimmvM~Mm~~omvNO**  **~~~~VV~~M~Om~v~MNNNN** MMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNN **~/// ~**  **~** , ........

. , ....... .,,....

**~**"t•· ""I"' ""I""

' " '1"""'"1""'" 'I'"" '1""""'1 ""' 1 0 9 8 7 6

5 4 3

2 1 ppm **B~R** L><..J **NA.~** 20141205 £Xl'NO

2 PROCJ;o

1 Da te_ 20Ult05 T.u:;e 9.28 lUST.RDM .spect PROEHD
5 em PABBO EBPULPROG ozqJO TO 65536 SOLVE IG OMSO tiS

'I OS

0 SWH 9014. ·123 Hz FlDRE.S 0.13"1549 H:z: AQ 3.6351135 sec RG 9().5 ow 55.467 U!ICC 0!':

6 . 50 usee n: 6"1l.2 K 01 1. OOOOOCOO sec '!00

1 **-~~-** CHANr:E:t.

! 1 **--~** IIUCl
lH Pl ,I'. 10 **u~Pr.** PLl 1.00 dB PLlW 10.29555321 W SFOl 300.1318534 Mff: SI 32768 SF' JOO .1300022 Mflz WOW

**!:~** ssa

o LS 0.30 H:z: GJl.

0 PC 15.00
**Exhibit99.1**

 

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rural CellularCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2001, I, Richard P. Ekstrand,President and Chief Executive Officer of Rural Cellular Corporation, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1) such Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,2001, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2001, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rural CellularCorporation.

 

 
| Date:  December 20, 2002 |   | /s/  Richard P. Ekstrand               |   |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Richard  P. Ekstrand                   |
|                     |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amended Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Paul E. Heney, Chief Executive Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








June 11, 2012





By:





/s/ Paul E. Heney


Paul E. Heney


Chief Executive Officer
#### § 75.456 Participant support costs.

Participant support costs as defined in § 75.2 are allowable with the prior approval of the HHS awarding agency.

[81 FR 3018, Jan. 20, 2016]
Document

Exhibit 10.15

ADDENDUM TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Ross Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) and Travis Marquette (the “Executive”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby enter into this Addendum to the Executive Employment Agreement entered into by the Parties effective August 16, 2019 and any subsequent renewal of such agreement (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), and agree for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, as follows:


1. This Addendum is effective as of April 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).  
2. Notwithstanding Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement to the contrary, for the period beginning on the Effective Date and continuing until the date on which the Company determines, in its sole discretion, that at least fifty percent (50%) of the Company’s stores closed as of the Effective Date due to the COVID-19 health pandemic have fully reopened, Executive’s current gross salary shall be decreased by twenty percent (20%).  
3. This Addendum may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement.  A signed copy of this Addendum delivered by facsimile, e-mail, electronic signature, or other means of electronic transmission (including scan or .PDF) shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Addendum.
4. Except as otherwise amended by this Addendum, all provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  The Employment Agreement, as modified by this Addendum, represents the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements or understandings between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Addendum shall form a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have knowingly and voluntarily executed this Addendum as of the dates set forth below:






															
	ROSS STORES, INC.			EXECUTIVE	
					
	/s/Barbara Rentler			/s/Travis Marquette	
					
	Name:	Barbara Rentler		Name:	Travis Marquette
					
	Dated:	3/31/2020		Dated:	3/31/2020
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1909 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to suspend the application 

of mark-to-market accounting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to 

suspend the application of mark-to-market accounting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF MARK-TO-MARKET ACCOUNT4 ING. 

5 Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall 

7 suspend, by rule, regulation, or order, the application of 

8 mark-to-market accounting as provided in Statement 157 

9 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board for any reVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:01 Apr 08, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1909.IH H1909

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1909 IH

1 ports required to be submitted to the Commission after 

2 January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11102 (Summary Calendar)

RICHARD C. HOWARD, doing business C. D. Assets, Inc.; doing business as Howard Trucking, Inc.; doing business as Mezzagez Publishing, Inc.; doing business as Mezzagez Records, Inc.; doing business as Mezzagez Productions, Inc.; doing business as North Texas Autoworks, Inc.; doing business as Air of Zulu, Inc.; doing business as R. Howard and Associates, Inc.; and all other outstanding creditors of these named entities, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDREW STOVER, individually and in his official capacity, et al.,

Defendants,

ANDREW STOVER, individually and in his official capacity; JOHN VANCE, individual and in his official capacity; LISA PATTERSON, individually and in her official capacity,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas (3:95-CV-114-T)

July 22, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *2

The appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their motions to require a response

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) and for a protective order. These orders are not appealable interlocutory

orders. We are thus without jurisdiction. S ee Lion Boulos v. Wilson

, 834 F.2d 504, 507-09 (5th Cir.

1987). The appeal is DISMISSED.

Richard C. Howard’s motion for leave to file a reply to the appellant’s reply brief is DENIED

AS MOOT.

APPEAL DISMISSED.