alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Registrant Company
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) for March 31, 1999 and Consolidated
Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the Three Months ended March 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>        
<CIK>   0001071001
<NAME>  COAXIAL FINANCING CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                1,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,000
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 10
<OTHER-SE>                                              990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1,000
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
In The Matter Of: 

NORTHEASTERN 

AVIATION CORP. 

Respondent 

SERVED: JANUARY 9, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) Docket No. FAA-2012-1264 

) 

) 

) Case No. 2012EA110030 

) 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On December 3, 2013, a Notice of Hearing Location was filed. This Notice informed the. 

parties that the Hearing set for January 28-29, 2014, would be held at the U.S. District Court in 

Central Islip, New York. 

On December 9, 2013, the Respondent filed a Notice of Substitution of Counsel and 

Entry of Appearance. This Notice withdrew Mf. James G. Ehrig as counsel of record for the 

Respondent and substituted Mr. Edward J. Longosz and Ms. Evelyn D. Sahr. All three attorneys 

are from the law firm of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Merriott, LLC. 

On January 8, 2014, the FAA filed the Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint stating that 

the FAA "withdraws its Complaint in this matter[.]" 

After reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulations, statutory authority, and being fully 

advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Hearing set for January 28-29, 2014, in Central Islip, New York is cancelled. 

2. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this • 

proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
'j 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1264 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz 

Ms. Evelyn D. Sahr 

Respondent's Counsel 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC 

ONE COPY 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1200 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-659..,6622 

FAX: 202-659-6699 

elongosz@eckerts.eamans.com 

dsahr@eckertseamans.com · 

Judge J.E. Sullivan, 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 

20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
November 4, 2010

The Honorable L isa Jackson Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building (Mail Code 1101) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Re: Petition for Reconsideration of Portions of the Final Rule: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines Dear Administrator Jackson: I am writing in support of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s (NRECA) October 19, 20 1 0, Petition for Reconsideration of portions of the Final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines promulgated on August 20, 2010, ( 75 F ed. Reg. 51 , 570 )

. Lemke Farm is a member

- owner of Cass County Electric Cooperative Inc. (CCEC) and is currentl y participating in its electric load management program b y using our stationary engine generator. The engine generator provides electric power to our facility during times of peak load conditions. In the past several years, the total hours of operation logged on the generator for this program has not exceeded 100 hours. In asmuch as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules allow an emergency use engine generator to operate up to 100 hours annually for non

- emergency

situations, why should it make any

difference how a business chooses to operate its generator within that 100 hour limitation? In other words, wh y are there restrictions within those 100 hours of non - emergency

use for peak shaving? The option to use my generator as part of a peak shaving program on a limited basis is important to me and helps my cooperative operate its distribution sy stem most effectivel y. Itseems to me that this small change to y our rules would make the rules more reasonable without sacrificing air quality

. Lemke Farm supports NRECA ’s petition to remove the restrictions in use of emergency stationary engine generators as they pertain to use for peak shaving. Since the EPA has determined that 100 hours of non

- emergency use of a stationary

engine generator poses little health risk or e nvironmental harm above that alread y contemplated in the rule , IThe Honorable Lisa Jackson

November 4, 2010 Page 2 believe it should not make an y difference under what conditions the unit is operated within that the 100 hours of allowable non

- emergency operation In conclusion, Lemke Farm respectfully re quests the EPA reconsiders it s proposed rule for spark ignition (SI) engines. Assuming the agency recognizes the common

- sense logic presented in this letter with regard to the proposed SIrules, and the proposed changes put forth by NRECA, we also urge th e agency to apply that same logic to the current RICE rules so as to make the final NESHAP rule consistent and uniform throughout all stationary engine generators powered by liquid fossil

- fuels. Lemke Farm respectfull y requests consideration of its reques t and proposed changes, and thanks the EPA in advance for the same. Thank you for y our prompt attention and I look forward to y our response. Sincerel y,

cc: Robert Wayland , EPA Melanie King , EPA Kevin Bromberg, SBA
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR
- 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: June 20, 2014 Brief Remarks Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants at the meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors held in Dallas

**SUMMARY** Brief remarks were made by EPA at the meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors held in Dallas on the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Large group setting EPA Participant : Ron Curry ( R egional Administrator )
#### § 108.701 Sounding equipment.

Each self-propelled unit must have a mechanical or electronic sounding apparatus.
**Exhibit 32** **Section 1350    Certifications**     The undersigned hereby certifies that the quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Phibro Animal Health Corporation (the “Registrant”)    for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/  Gerald    K. Carlson    Gerald K. Carlson*Chief Executive Officer**(Principal Executive Officer)*     Date: February 14, 2006 /s/  Richard    G. Johnson    Richard G. Johnson*Chief Financial Officer**(Principal Financial Officer)*     Date: February 14, 2006
July 18, 20 14 Memorandum Subject:

From:

To: July 

### 16, 2014 Teleconference Between the National Tribal Air Association (NTAA) and U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) Chris Stoneman, Policy Advisor CL



# ~ Outreach and Information Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 This memorandum to docket provides a briefsummary ofthe main discussion points made atthe subjectmeeting duringthe commentperiod for the proposed rule: "General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source Review Program in Indian Country." (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014) Teleconference details: When: July 

### 16, 2014; 2:30- 4:00pm ET Participants: Chris Stoneman, EPA, OAQPS Toni Colon, EPA, OAQPS Lisa Beckham, EPA, Region 9 Geoffrey Glass, EPA, Region 9 Minnie Grant, Ute Indian Tribe Kevin Greenleaf, Kootenai Tribe ofIdaho Ben Foxx, Pedro Bay Village Council Alex Cabillo, Hualapai Tribe Tom Shepard, Little River Band ofOttawa Indians Ryan Eberle, Gila River Indian Country Greg Little, Inter Tribal Council ofArizona Brandy Toft, Leech Lack Band ofOjibwe Dejene Alemayehu, Kaw Nation Charlie Lippert, Mille Lacs Band ofOjibwe Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA Andrea Boyer, Nez Perce Tribe To startthe teleconference, EPA provided an overview ofthe EPA effort underway to issue general permits/permits byrule for true minor sources in Indian country, including the latest Bundle #2 proposal. Following the general overview, EPA went through in detail the proposed general permits for engines (spark ignition and compression ignition), boilers and sawmill facilities. Tribal participants raised several questions as follows:

### • Sawmill Facilities General Permit- how to handle board foot compliance

·prior to 12 months f or a 12-month, ro lling totaiboard f oot fimi t; • Setbackrequirements- asked for clarification on what "nearby property" means; • Boilers- suggested moving up conditions 19, 20, 

### and 23 to avoid them being overlooked; and • Existing minor sources in Indian country- asked for clarification on whether these sources are required to obtain permits. The EPA answered basic questions about whatthe proposed Bundle #2 rule contains and took some ofthe questions received as comments. This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the proposed rule and will be available for public review.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Jeffrey R. Hultman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Siena Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 21, 2007 /s/ Jeffrey R. Hultman   Jeffrey R. Hultman                                 Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES F-3 AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      318
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,736
<PP&E>                                             800
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (29)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (979)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,192)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.23)


</TABLE>
EX-10.(4)(2)


  Exhibit 10.4.2

 
  

 
 

	 
	 InMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 Suite #340- 200 Granville St.

Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4
 Canada
  



 
  
  

 
  
  

01 SEPTEMBER 2018
  

 
 Dear Eric Hsu,

 
 In recognition of your agreement to increase your work commitment to InMed to 80% of
full time, I am pleased to make the following changes to your compensation:
  
 Base
Salary - will increase to $224,000 as of the date of this letter; and
  

Options - subject to approval by the Board of Directors, you will be issued an additional 270,000 options to purchase common shares in the Company as per the
Company’s standard options policies, priced on or around the date of this letter.
  

On behalf of the entire Management Team and Board of Directors, thank you for your contributions to the Company’s success and we look forward to achieving more,
together.
  
 /s/ Eric A. Adams

Eric A. Adams President and CEO
 InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.
§ 11.402 Tonnage requirements for national ocean or near-coastal endorsements for vessels of 1,600 GRT or more. ( a ) To qualify for a national ocean or near-coastal endorsement for service on vessels of unlimited tonnage— ( 1 ) All the required experience must be obtained on vessels of 100 GRT or more; and
( 2 ) At least one-half of the required experience must be obtained on vessels of 1,600 GRT or more.
( b ) If an applicant for a national endorsement as master or mate of unlimited tonnage does not have the service on vessels of 1,600 GRT or more as required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a tonnage limitation will be placed on the MMC based on the applicant's qualifying experience. The endorsement will be limited to the maximum tonnage on which at least 25 percent of the required experience was obtained, or 150 percent of the maximum tonnage on which at least 50 percent of the service was obtained, whichever is higher. However, the minimum tonnage limitation calculated according to this paragraph will be 2,000 GRT. Limitations are in multiples of 1,000 GRT using the next higher figure when an intermediate tonnage is calculated. When the calculated limitation equals or exceeds 10,000 GRT, the applicant is issued an unlimited tonnage endorsement.
( c ) Tonnage limitations imposed under paragraph (b) of this section may be raised or removed in one of the following manners: ( 1 ) When the applicant provides evidence of 6 months of service on vessels of 1,600 GRT or more in the highest grade endorsed, all tonnage limitations will be removed.
( 2 ) When the applicant provides evidence of 6 months of service on vessels of 1,600 GRT or more in any capacity as an officer other than the highest grade for which he or she is endorsed, all tonnage limitations for the grade in which the service is performed will be removed and the next higher grade endorsement will be raised to the tonnage of the vessel on which the majority of the service was performed. The total cumulative service before and after issuance of the limited license or MMC officer endorsement may be considered in removing all tonnage limitations.
( 3 ) When the applicant has 12 months of service as able seaman on vessels of 1,600 GRT or more while holding a license or endorsement as third mate, all tonnage limitations on the third mate's license or MMC officer endorsement will be removed.
( d ) No applicant holding any national endorsement as master or mate of vessels of less than 1,600 GRT, less than 500 GRT, or less than 25-200 GRT may use the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section to increase the tonnages of his or her license or endorsement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MORRIS WEATHERSPOON, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-12789 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

GEORGE LNU, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

OBJECTIONS TO REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF #99)

 On December 23, 2015, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued two Reports and 

Recommendations recommending that this Court grant summary judgment in favor of 

Defendants Dr. Badawi Abdellatif (ECF #96) and Angela Vettraino (ECF #97) (together, 

the “R&Rs”). On January 7, 2016, Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon (“Weatherspoon”) 

filed a Motion requesting a 45-day extension of time to file objections to the R&Rs (the 

“Motion”). (See ECF #99.) 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and Weatherspoon 

shall file any objections he may have to the R&Rs by February 22, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: January 8, 2016 

2:14-cv-12789-MFL-DRG Doc # 100 Filed 01/08/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 732
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or 

counsel of record on January 8, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-12789-MFL-DRG Doc # 100 Filed 01/08/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 733
§ 112.39-1 General. ( a ) Each battery-operated, relay-controlled lantern used in accordance with Table 112.05-5(a) must: ( 1 ) Have rechargeable batteries;
( 2 ) Have an automatic battery charger that maintains the battery in a fully charged condition; and
( 3 ) Not be readily portable.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15267, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28287, June 4, 1996]