alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20427-03 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

WILLIAM ALEXANDER MCCASKEY, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On October 17, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on October 20, 

2014, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 86, is ADOPTED. 

 

Case 1:14-cr-20427-TLL-PTM ECF No. 97, PageID.609 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 2
 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 84, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: November 6, 2014 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on November 6, 2014. 

 s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

 TRACY A. JACOBS 

Case 1:14-cr-20427-TLL-PTM ECF No. 97, PageID.610 Filed 11/06/14 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Petitioner, Case No. 14-20427-05 

v Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

MELVIN ANDREW MORRIS, 

 

 Defendant-Respondent. 

___________________________________/ 

JUDGMENT 

In accordance with the Court’s order denying the motions to vacate Petitioner’s sentence 

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 entered on this date, 

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motions to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2255 are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

 It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

 It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal is DENIED.

 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: July 30, 2020 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and to Melvin 

Andrew Morris #50229-039, GILMER FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. BOX 6000, GLENVILLE, 

WV 26351 by first class U.S. mail on July 30, 2020. 

 s/Kelly Winslow 

 KELLY WINSLOW, Case Manager 

Case 1:14-cr-20427-TLL-PTM ECF No. 333, PageID.2259 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 1
150°0'0"W

150°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

61°0'0"N

61°0'0"N

Hope

Salamatof

Skilak Lake

C o o k

I n l e t

Scenic Lake

Pepper Lake

Gene Lake

Unnamed Lake in

T. 6 N., R. 5 W., Sec. 11

Swanson Lake

Sterling Highway

Figure 11. Alternative B - Airplane

Access to Lakes in Designated

Wilderness North of the Sterling Highway

Produced in the Division of Realty

and Natural Resources

Anchorage, Alaska

Current to: February 5, 2008

Kenai

NWR

Anchorage

Map

Extent

0 2.5 5 10

Miles

08-0057 JGB

Note: This map does not address land ownership.

0 3.5 7 14

Kilometers

Open

Early Access

Ice Fishing Only

Change from Alternative A

Dave Spencer Wilderness Area

Andrew Simons Wilderness Area

Mystery Creek Wilderness Area

Refuge Boundary

Cook Lake Sandpiper Lake

Vogel Lake

Tangerra Lake

Taiga Lake

Norak Lake

Bedlam Lake

Mull Lake

Shoepac Lake

Nekutak Lake

Wilderness Lake

King Lake

Grouse Lake

Snowshoe Lake

Kenai Sterling

Soldotna

Chickaloon Bay

Turnagain Arm

Bird Lake

Airplane Access
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectromagnetic scattering by impedance structuresThe scattering of electromagnetic waves from impedance structures is investigated, and current work on antenna pattern calculation is presented. A general algorithm for determining radiation patterns from antennas mounted near or on polygonal plates is presented. These plates are assumed to be of a material which satisfies the Leontovich (or surface impedance) boundary condition. Calculated patterns including reflection and diffraction terms are presented for numerious geometries, and refinements are included for antennas mounted directly on impedance surfaces. For the case of a monopole mounted on a surface impedance ground plane, computed patterns are compared with experimental measurements. This work in antenna pattern prediction forms the basis of understanding of the complex scattering mechanisms from impedance surfaces. It provides the foundation for the analysis of backscattering patterns which, in general, are more problematic than calculation of antenna patterns. Further proposed study of related topics, including surface waves, corner diffractions, and multiple diffractions, is outlined.Document ID19870016822Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBalanis, Constantine A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Griesser, Timothy*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-181147NAS 1.26:181147Accession Number87N26255Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-562Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870016822.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 23.2

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-91583)  of SmartServ  Online,  Inc.  pertaining  to its Amended And
Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan,  Non-Qualified  Stock Option Agreements Between
The Registrant  And Its Employees,  and  Non-Qualified  Stock Option  Agreements
Between The  Registrant  And Its  Non-Employee  Directors  and the  Registration
Statement of SmartServ Online,  Inc. (Form S-8 No. 333-47936)  pertaining to its
Non-Qualified  Stock Option  Contract  Between The Registrant And Alan G. Bozian
and the 1999 Stock  Option of our report  dated April 23,  2003,  except for the
second  paragraph of Note 1 as to which the date is March 24, 2004, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SmartServ Online, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.



/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

March 24, 2004
[No. 3444.]

#### Farmers’ High Line Canal and Reservoir Co. et al. v. Wolff et al.

Motion to remand denied on authority ■ of Monte Vista Canal Co. v. Centennial Irrigation Co., post.

*Appeal from Denver District Court.*Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.

Motion to remand denied.

Mr. C. B. Whiteord, Mr. Henry E. May, for appellants.

Messrs. Thomas & Thomas, Mr. John R. Smith, for appellees.

King, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Motion is made to remand.this cause to the supreme court for the reason that the decision necessarily relates to or involves a freehold. The judgment appealed from was rendered by the district court in a statutory proceeding for permission to change the point of diversion of decreed water-rights. The facts and conditions of this cause, so far as material in considering this motion, are so nearly the same as in *Monte Vista Canal Co. et al. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co.,*in which opinion was handed down at this term, that the reasons and con*271elusions therein announced are controlling, and under that authority the motion herein to remand will he denied.
§ 108.443 Controls and valves. ( a ) At least one control for operating a CO2 system must be outside the space or spaces that the system protects and in a location that would be accessible if a fire occurred in any space that the system protects. Control valves must not be located in a protected space unless the CO2 cylinders are also in the protected space.
( b ) A CO2 system that protects more than one space must have a manifold with a stop valve, the normal position of which is closed, that directs the flow of CO2 to each protected space.
( c ) A CO2 system that protects only one space must have a stop valve installed between the cylinders and the discharge outlets in the system, except on a system that has a CO2 supply of 136 kilograms (300 pounds) or less.
( d ) At least one of the control stations in a CO2 system that protects a machinery space must be as near as practicable to one of the main escapes from that space.
( e ) All distribution valves and controls must be of an approved type.
( f ) Each CO2 system that has a stop valve must have a remote control that operates only the stop valve and must have a separate remote control for releasing the required amount of CO2 into the space protected by the system.
( g ) Each CO2 system that does not have a stop valve must be operated by a remote control that releases the required amount of CO2 into the space protected by the system.
( h ) Remote controls to each space must be in an enclosure.
( i ) Each system must have a manual control at its cylinders for releasing CO2 from the cylinders, except that if the system has pilot cylinders, a manual control is not required for other than pilot cylinders.
( j ) If gas pressure is used to release CO2 from a system having more than 2 cylinders, the system must have at least 2 pilot cylinders to release the CO2 from the remaining cylinders.
( k ) If the entrance to a space containing the CO2 supply or controls of a CO2 system has a lock, the space must have a key to the lock in a break-glass type box that is next to and visible from the entrance.
segn_ex104.htm

EXHIBIT 10.4
 
 
 
 
	 
	1
	

	 

  
 
	 
	2
	

	 

  
 
	 
	3
	

	 

  
 
	 
	4
	

	 

  
 
	 
	5
	

	 

  
 
	 
	6
	

	 

  
 
 
	 
	7
Editorial Note on Subpart 113.25 of Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 113.25 of part 113 appear by CGD-94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996.

§ 113.25-11 Contact makers. Each contact maker must— ( a ) Have normally open contacts and be constructed in accordance with Type 4 or 4X of NEMA 250 or IP 56 of IEC 60529:2013 (both incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subpart) requirements;
( b ) Have a switch handle that can be maintained in the “on” position;
( c ) Have the “off” and “on” positions of the operating handle permanently marked; and
( d ) Have an inductive load rating not less than the connected load or, on large vessels, have auxiliary devices to interrupt the load current.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 23910, May 1, 1997; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65201, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
# C_2008038EN.01000101.xml

| 12.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities

(2008/C 38/01)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities (2) are amended as follows:

1

2

On page 363:

On page 363:

CHAPTER 90

OPTICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, MEASURING, CHECKING, PRECISION, MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS; PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREOF

General

The following text is inserted after the existing text:

The following text is inserted after the existing text:

‘Parts of tripods of this chapter are to be classified according to their constituent material.’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1352/2007 (OJ L 303, 21.11.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  OJ C 50, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

2

---
#### §§ 84.95-84.97 [Reserved]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

TO ADDRESS THE FRAMEWORK OF THE RULEMAKING PROCESS

FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORS

U.S. Department of Energy

Forrestal Building

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Room 8E

- 08 9

Monday, October 18, 2010

9:00 a m

– 4: 00 p m



## Purpose

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this informal public meeting to begin the

rulemaking process for energy efficiency standards for certain electric motors. DOE will present

its proposed approach to the data gathering, analyses, and methodologies it will use during the

rulemaking process. T his public meeting will provide an opportunity for questions, comments,

and discussion from those present. In addition and throughout the ru lemaking process, DOE

invites written comments, information, and data from all interested parties.



## Agenda

9:00

– 9:05 am Welcome

Doug Brookman

9:05

– 9:20 am Introductions and Agenda Review

Jim Raba

9:20

– 9:40 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties

Jim Raba

9:40

– 9:50 am Regulatory History

Jeremy Gordon

9:50

– 10:15 am Rulemaking Overview and Scope of Coverage

Jeremy Gordon

10:15

– 10:30 am Break

10:30

– 11:00 am Market and Technology Assessment and Screening An alysis

Jeremy Gordon

11:00

– 11:45 am Engineering AnalysisJeremy Gordon

11:45

– 12:45 pm Break for Lunch

12:45

– 1:00 pm Energy Use Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

1:00

– 1:15 pm Markups for Equipment Price Determination

Sanaee Iyama

1:15

– 1:45 pm Life

- Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

1:45

– 2:15 pm Shipments Analysis, National Impacts Analysis, and Life

- Cycle Cost

Subgroup Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

2:15

– 2:30 pm Break

2:30

– 2:40 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Jeremy Gordo n

2:40

– 3:10 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

3:10

– 3:55 pm Other Issues and Comments; Closing Remarks

Doug Brookman
Exhibit 32.01

IDT CORPORATION

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of IDT Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, James A. Courter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 14, 2008

|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ James A. Courter   
|James A. Courter       
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDT Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 4100
- 4101
- 4102
- 4103
- 4104
- 4105
- 4106
- 4107
- 4108
- 4109
- 4110
- 4111
- 4112
- 4113
- 4114
- 4115
- 4116
- 4117
- 4118
- 4119
- 4120
- 4121
- 4122
- 4123
- 4124
- 4125
- 4126
- 4127
- 4128
- 4129
- 4130
- 4131
- 4132
- 4133
- 4134
- 4135
- 4136
- 4137
- 4138
- 4139
- 4140
- 4141
- 4142
- 4143
- 4144
- 4145
- 4146
- 4147
- 4148
- 4149
- 4150
- 4151
- 4152
- 4153
- 4154
- 4155
- 4156
- 4157
- 4158
- 4159
- 4160
- 4161
- 4162
- 4163
- 4164
- 4165
- 4166
#### Erastus Corning, *Respondent, v.*James T. Walker, *Appellant*.

Judgment reversed. Referee discharged, new trial granted, costs to abide ev'ent. Opinion by

Osborn, J.;

Learned, P. J., not acting.
§ 11.482 Assistance towing. ( a ) This section contains the requirements to qualify for an endorsement authorizing a mariner to engage in assistance towing. Except as noted in this paragraph, holders of MMC officer and OUPV endorsements must have an assistance towing endorsement to engage in assistance towing. Holders of endorsements as master or mate (pilot) of towing vessels or master or mate endorsements authorizing service on inspected vessels of 200 GRT or more do not need the assistance towing endorsement.
( b ) An applicant for an assistance towing endorsement must pass a written examination or complete a Coast Guard-approved course demonstrating his or her knowledge of assistance towing safety, equipment, and procedures.
( c ) The holder of a license or MMC for master, mate, or operator endorsed for assistance towing is authorized to engage in assistance towing on any vessel within the scope of the license or MMC.
( d ) The period of validity of the endorsement is the same as the license or MMC on which it is included, and it may be renewed with the MMC.
|   | (1)                                      The Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                                      The information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      12, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/      Jeffrey R.      Hultman                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |   |           Jeffrey R. Hultman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                                    |   |   |           Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                                    |   |   |                (Principal Financial and AccountingOfficer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |

----
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                */s/ Michael H. Braun*                    |                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| **Michael                H. Braun, Chief Executive Officer** | August                11, 2008 |

----
§ 11.1001 Purpose of rules. ( a ) The rules in this subpart implement Regulation I/10 of the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 as amended (STCW) (incorporated by reference, see § 11.102 of this part) by establishing requirements and procedures for the recognition and endorsement of officer certificates of competence issued by other Parties to STCW.
( b ) Specific regulations on the use of non-U.S. credentialed officers and mariners with officer endorsements (except those of master) are found in § 15.720 of this subchapter.
#### § 705.11 Penalties.

Any person who makes a false statement in connection with any request for a record, or in any request for an amendment to a record under this part, is subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 494 and 495.