# CE2010015EN.01014201.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 15/142 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 15/142

---

Thursday 23 October 2008Draft general budget 2009 (Section III)

P6_TA(2008)0515

European Parliament resolution of 23 October 2008 on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III — Commission (C6-0309/2008 — 2008/2026(BUD)) and Letter of amendment No 1/2009 (SEC(2008)2435) to the preliminary draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009

2010/C 15 E/47

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty and Article 177 of the Euratom Treaty,

having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities’ own resources (1),

1

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2),

2

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (3),

3

having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2008 on the Commission’s Annual Policy Strategy for 2009 (4),

4

having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2008 on the budgetary framework and priorities for 2009 (5),

5

having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2008 on the 2009 budget: First reflections on the 2009 Preliminary Draft Budget and mandate for the conciliation, Section III — Commission (6),

6

having regard to the preliminary draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 which the Commission presented on 16 May 2008 (COM(2008)0300),

having regard to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, which the Council established on 17 July 2008 (C6-0309/2008),

having regard to Letter of amendment No 1/2009 (SEC(2008)2435) to the preliminary draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009,

having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the other committees concerned (A6-0398/2008),

Key issues

Key issues

| 1. | Recalls that its political priorities and its assessment of the budgetary framework for the year 2009 were set out in its two abovementioned resolutions of 24 April 2008; notes that these two resolutions provided a sound basis for its ensuing first evaluation of the Commission’s preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2009, as set out in its abovementioned PDB resolution adopted on 8 July 2008; recalls that Parliament, in this resolution, was highly critical of the low level of payment appropriations and of the small margins available in most of the headings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Recalls that its political priorities and its assessment of the budgetary framework for the year 2009 were set out in its two abovementioned resolutions of 24 April 2008; notes that these two resolutions provided a sound basis for its ensuing first evaluation of the Commission’s preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2009, as set out in its abovementioned PDB resolution adopted on 8 July 2008; recalls that Parliament, in this resolution, was highly critical of the low level of payment appropriations and of the small margins available in most of the headings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF);

| 2. | Welcomes the agreement of six joint statements, annexed to this Resolution, of the European Parliament and Council at the first reading conciliation on the 2009 budget of 17 July 2008; has taken them into account in the preparation of its amendments to the draft budget; points out, however, that on some issues, such as the evaluation of agencies, no joint position with Council has yet been reached; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Welcomes the agreement of six joint statements, annexed to this Resolution, of the European Parliament and Council at the first reading conciliation on the 2009 budget of 17 July 2008; has taken them into account in the preparation of its amendments to the draft budget; points out, however, that on some issues, such as the evaluation of agencies, no joint position with Council has yet been reached;

| 3. | Deplores the fact that Council has reduced an already low-level PDB even further: commitment appropriations in the draft budget total EUR 133 933 million which represents a decrease relative to PDB of EUR 469 million, and payment appropriations of EUR 114 972 million lie a full EUR 1 771 million beneath PDB corresponding to 0,89 % of GNI, bringing payments down to an unprecedentedly low level; underlines that this has even further increased the disparity between the level of commitments and payments, which is contrary to the principle of equilibrium; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Deplores the fact that Council has reduced an already low-level PDB even further: commitment appropriations in the draft budget total EUR 133 933 million which represents a decrease relative to PDB of EUR 469 million, and payment appropriations of EUR 114 972 million lie a full EUR 1 771 million beneath PDB corresponding to 0,89 % of GNI, bringing payments down to an unprecedentedly low level; underlines that this has even further increased the disparity between the level of commitments and payments, which is contrary to the principle of equilibrium;

| 4. | Calls for the ceiling for heading 4 to be adjusted at the first opportunity to correspond to actual needs; deplores the fact that Council is not willing to budget appropriately in this way; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Calls for the ceiling for heading 4 to be adjusted at the first opportunity to correspond to actual needs; deplores the fact that Council is not willing to budget appropriately in this way;

| 5. | Supports Letter of amendment No 1 to the PDB 2009 adopted by the Commission on 9 September 2008, as it seems to give a slightly more realistic picture of needs in heading 4 than the PDB; regrets, however, that due to the constraints of the MFF 2007-2013 it is not in a position to take over new unforeseen and urgent needs such as food aid and the reconstruction needs of Georgia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Palestine; underlines that it is only recourse to the possibilities provided for by the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 (IIA) and firm political determination which is an absolute necessity to allow the EU to fulfil its commitments undertaken in the external policy area; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Supports Letter of amendment No 1 to the PDB 2009 adopted by the Commission on 9 September 2008, as it seems to give a slightly more realistic picture of needs in heading 4 than the PDB; regrets, however, that due to the constraints of the MFF 2007-2013 it is not in a position to take over new unforeseen and urgent needs such as food aid and the reconstruction needs of Georgia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Palestine; underlines that it is only recourse to the possibilities provided for by the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 (IIA) and firm political determination which is an absolute necessity to allow the EU to fulfil its commitments undertaken in the external policy area;

| 6. | Considers that the figure adopted by Council for payment appropriations is far from being coherent with the various EU political priorities and commitments; expresses its astonishment that Council can officially propose a mere 0,89 % of GNI in payments, given an overall RAL of already EUR 139 000 million in 2007; in consequence, decides to increase the overall level of payments to 0,959 %; |
| --- | --- |

6.

Considers that the figure adopted by Council for payment appropriations is far from being coherent with the various EU political priorities and commitments; expresses its astonishment that Council can officially propose a mere 0,89 % of GNI in payments, given an overall RAL of already EUR 139 000 million in 2007; in consequence, decides to increase the overall level of payments to 0,959 %;

| 7. | Is of the opinion that the EU budget in its present format cannot address effectively and realistically the goals that the EU has set for climate change; considers that European citizens need a tangible European initiative to face the consequences of climate change; deplores the fact that the support to climate change measures is still very limited in the EU budget; is convinced that a serious effort should be made to increase and concentrate adequate financial resources to boost European leadership in facing the consequences of climate change; invites the Commission to present, by 15 March 2009, an ambitious plan for an adequate increase of climate change funds which considers the establishment of a specific ‘climate change fund’ or the creation of a dedicated budget line which would improve the budget capability to deal with these issues, especially by mitigation, adaptation and stabilisation measures; believes that the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) should also be considered as a potential resource at EU level; |
| --- | --- |

7.

Is of the opinion that the EU budget in its present format cannot address effectively and realistically the goals that the EU has set for climate change; considers that European citizens need a tangible European initiative to face the consequences of climate change; deplores the fact that the support to climate change measures is still very limited in the EU budget; is convinced that a serious effort should be made to increase and concentrate adequate financial resources to boost European leadership in facing the consequences of climate change; invites the Commission to present, by 15 March 2009, an ambitious plan for an adequate increase of climate change funds which considers the establishment of a specific ‘climate change fund’ or the creation of a dedicated budget line which would improve the budget capability to deal with these issues, especially by mitigation, adaptation and stabilisation measures; believes that the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) should also be considered as a potential resource at EU level;

| 8. | Is not prepared to accept any kind of new earmarking in the remarks of Budget 2009; has therefore deleted all proposed new references to concrete amounts and/or to individually named organisations or bodies, since such earmarkings are not in line with the Financial Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

8.

Is not prepared to accept any kind of new earmarking in the remarks of Budget 2009; has therefore deleted all proposed new references to concrete amounts and/or to individually named organisations or bodies, since such earmarkings are not in line with the Financial Regulation;

| 9. | Has decided to accept Council’s small cuts in the administrative expenditure lines of some multi-annual programmes given the fact that the Commission itself frequently reallocates funds from these lines by transfer in a general clearing exercise; stresses, however, that these reductions in one annual budgetary procedure must under no circumstances lead to reductions in the overall co-decided envelopes of the programmes concerned; insists that the Commission compensate for the amounts reduced in later years of the programme period; |
| --- | --- |

9.

Has decided to accept Council’s small cuts in the administrative expenditure lines of some multi-annual programmes given the fact that the Commission itself frequently reallocates funds from these lines by transfer in a general clearing exercise; stresses, however, that these reductions in one annual budgetary procedure must under no circumstances lead to reductions in the overall co-decided envelopes of the programmes concerned; insists that the Commission compensate for the amounts reduced in later years of the programme period;

| 10. | Considers growth and employment, the fight against climate change and strengthening the safety and security of the European Union’s citizens and its social dimension, for instance through the growth for jobs initiative and the support for SMEs and for research and innovation, as well as by supporting cohesion amongst regions, to be important priorities of Budget 2009; will reinforce appropriations on budget lines financing these priorities in line with its previous resolutions; |
| --- | --- |

10.

Considers growth and employment, the fight against climate change and strengthening the safety and security of the European Union’s citizens and its social dimension, for instance through the growth for jobs initiative and the support for SMEs and for research and innovation, as well as by supporting cohesion amongst regions, to be important priorities of Budget 2009; will reinforce appropriations on budget lines financing these priorities in line with its previous resolutions;

On sub-heading 1a

On sub-heading 1a

| 11. | Is astonished by Council’s additional cuts on lines supporting the Lisbon strategy which is, after all, based on a European Council decision; points out that the objectives of growth and employment are at the very core of the Lisbon strategy and that the Commission, in its PDB, had already decreased some lines compared to the previous year; |
| --- | --- |

11.

Is astonished by Council’s additional cuts on lines supporting the Lisbon strategy which is, after all, based on a European Council decision; points out that the objectives of growth and employment are at the very core of the Lisbon strategy and that the Commission, in its PDB, had already decreased some lines compared to the previous year;

| 12. | Will do its utmost to secure adequate financing for all activities and policies under this heading which can bring direct and tangible advantages for European citizens; is prepared to use all the available margin to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions in this sub-heading; |
| --- | --- |

12.

Will do its utmost to secure adequate financing for all activities and policies under this heading which can bring direct and tangible advantages for European citizens; is prepared to use all the available margin to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions in this sub-heading;

| 13. | Concerning the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), cannot accept the Commission’s attempt to reverse the decisions taken by the budgetary authority in the 2008 budget; will therefore insist that the budget of the EIT be included in policy area ‘Research’ and that its governing structure, being of an administrative nature, be financed under heading 5 of the MFF; decides to change the nomenclature accordingly; |
| --- | --- |

13.

Concerning the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), cannot accept the Commission’s attempt to reverse the decisions taken by the budgetary authority in the 2008 budget; will therefore insist that the budget of the EIT be included in policy area ‘Research’ and that its governing structure, being of an administrative nature, be financed under heading 5 of the MFF; decides to change the nomenclature accordingly;

| 14. | Stresses that the disbursement of funds from budget line 06 03 04 (TENs Energy) and accordance of TEN-E status to any gas pipeline or project that facilitates the transmission of gas from Russia or from entities ultimately controlled by Russia shall be conditional on the realisation of the NG3 Route, as confirmed by the EU Coordinator; |
| --- | --- |

14.

Stresses that the disbursement of funds from budget line 06 03 04 (TENs Energy) and accordance of TEN-E status to any gas pipeline or project that facilitates the transmission of gas from Russia or from entities ultimately controlled by Russia shall be conditional on the realisation of the NG3 Route, as confirmed by the EU Coordinator;

On sub-heading 1b

On sub-heading 1b

| 15. | Reiterates the importance it attaches to the solidarity principle within the European Union; intends to make every effort to guarantee sufficient funding for cohesion policy in order to be able to deal with current and future challenges; |
| --- | --- |

15.

Reiterates the importance it attaches to the solidarity principle within the European Union; intends to make every effort to guarantee sufficient funding for cohesion policy in order to be able to deal with current and future challenges;

| 16. | Underlines that this sub-heading finances numerous important policies and activities aimed at fighting climate change and supporting growth for jobs; |
| --- | --- |

16.

Underlines that this sub-heading finances numerous important policies and activities aimed at fighting climate change and supporting growth for jobs;

| 17. | Regrets that the PDB has been cut by Council in particular as regards European Social Fund financing devoted to regional competitiveness and employment; reminds Council that the Lisbon strategy is based on joint efforts from both the European Union’s and the Member States’ budgets; |
| --- | --- |

17.

Regrets that the PDB has been cut by Council in particular as regards European Social Fund financing devoted to regional competitiveness and employment; reminds Council that the Lisbon strategy is based on joint efforts from both the European Union’s and the Member States’ budgets;

On heading 2

On heading 2

| 18. | Notes that the Commission has claimed that the fight against climate change is one of its priorities for Budget 2009; considers, however, that this priority is not sufficiently reflected in the PDB and intends, consequently, to put stronger emphasis on this key policy; proposes, for reasons of visibility, to allocate appropriations in one specific budget line solely for this purpose; will top up resources going to LIFE+ and to the European Rural Development Fund accordingly; |
| --- | --- |

18.

Notes that the Commission has claimed that the fight against climate change is one of its priorities for Budget 2009; considers, however, that this priority is not sufficiently reflected in the PDB and intends, consequently, to put stronger emphasis on this key policy; proposes, for reasons of visibility, to allocate appropriations in one specific budget line solely for this purpose; will top up resources going to LIFE+ and to the European Rural Development Fund accordingly;

| 19. | Takes note of the recent proposals by the Commission on the CAP health check and defends the view that any modulation from the first to the second pillar must remain budgetarily neutral; |
| --- | --- |

19.

Takes note of the recent proposals by the Commission on the CAP health check and defends the view that any modulation from the first to the second pillar must remain budgetarily neutral;

| 20. | Notes the creation of budget lines for three new funds in the common agricultural and fisheries policy — the fund for restructuring in the dairy sector, the Eco-Aid to maintain sheep and goat farming in the EU and the ad-hoc financial instrument — Adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of the rise in fuel prices — all of which have been created with the aim of adapting to new situations and opening up opportunities for the future, particularly in disadvantaged and sensitive regions; considers that these funds should primarily be financed from unused agriculture budget appropriations; |
| --- | --- |

20.

Notes the creation of budget lines for three new funds in the common agricultural and fisheries policy — the fund for restructuring in the dairy sector, the Eco-Aid to maintain sheep and goat farming in the EU and the ad-hoc financial instrument — Adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of the rise in fuel prices — all of which have been created with the aim of adapting to new situations and opening up opportunities for the future, particularly in disadvantaged and sensitive regions; considers that these funds should primarily be financed from unused agriculture budget appropriations;

| 21. | Notes with satisfaction that Council and Commission are finally willing to establish a school fruit scheme, making available a substantial annual amount to fight obesity and health problems amongst pupils, but deplores the fact that one year has been lost because this European Parliament initiative was rejected by Council in Budget 2008; |
| --- | --- |

21.

Notes with satisfaction that Council and Commission are finally willing to establish a school fruit scheme, making available a substantial annual amount to fight obesity and health problems amongst pupils, but deplores the fact that one year has been lost because this European Parliament initiative was rejected by Council in Budget 2008;

On sub-heading 3a

On sub-heading 3a

| 22. | Acknowledges European citizens’ wish for a safe and secure Europe and welcomes the increases in this sub-heading relative to Budget 2008; points out the importance of the principle of solidarity and of safeguarding the highest level of protection of fundamental rights; |
| --- | --- |

22.

Acknowledges European citizens’ wish for a safe and secure Europe and welcomes the increases in this sub-heading relative to Budget 2008; points out the importance of the principle of solidarity and of safeguarding the highest level of protection of fundamental rights;

| 23. | Stresses the importance of sufficient funding being made available via the EU budget to manage legal immigration and integration of third country nationals while, in parallel, tackling illegal immigration and strengthening border protection, including the strengthening of the European Refugee Fund to facilitate solidarity between the Member States; |
| --- | --- |

23.

Stresses the importance of sufficient funding being made available via the EU budget to manage legal immigration and integration of third country nationals while, in parallel, tackling illegal immigration and strengthening border protection, including the strengthening of the European Refugee Fund to facilitate solidarity between the Member States;

On sub-heading 3b

On sub-heading 3b

| 24. | Recalls that sub-heading 3b covers vital policies that have a direct impact on the everyday life of European citizens; reiterates its disappointment about the low increase compared to 2008 proposed by the Commission for this sub-heading, especially for those activities that are important for a citizens’ Europe, some of which have even suffered a decrease in their budgets; |
| --- | --- |

24.

Recalls that sub-heading 3b covers vital policies that have a direct impact on the everyday life of European citizens; reiterates its disappointment about the low increase compared to 2008 proposed by the Commission for this sub-heading, especially for those activities that are important for a citizens’ Europe, some of which have even suffered a decrease in their budgets;

| 25. | Cannot accept that Council has cut these ‘citizens’ lines’ even further, and will make sure that adequate resources are guaranteed in this important area; points out that it will make use of the small remaining margin in this sub-heading to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions to boost this policy area; |
| --- | --- |

25.

Cannot accept that Council has cut these ‘citizens’ lines’ even further, and will make sure that adequate resources are guaranteed in this important area; points out that it will make use of the small remaining margin in this sub-heading to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions to boost this policy area;

On heading 4

On heading 4

| 26. | Notes the significant re-shuffling of funds carried out by Council in heading 4 and considers this a strong indication of the serious shortage of resources available under the MFF ceiling; points out that heading 4 ceilings will make regular recourse to the provisions of the IIA more and more necessary; believes that the funds available do not, as they stand, allow the European Union to assume its role as a global partner; |
| --- | --- |

26.

Notes the significant re-shuffling of funds carried out by Council in heading 4 and considers this a strong indication of the serious shortage of resources available under the MFF ceiling; points out that heading 4 ceilings will make regular recourse to the provisions of the IIA more and more necessary; believes that the funds available do not, as they stand, allow the European Union to assume its role as a global partner;

| 27. | Calls on the European Council not to make far-reaching political commitments, as for example in its Presidency conclusions of 20 June 2008, in which the heads of State and government called for stronger EU financial support to developing countries, or to commit, at the same time, to the necessary budgetary suggestions and actions when there is an obvious contradiction with the funds available under the annual ceilings of the current MFF; |
| --- | --- |

27.

Calls on the European Council not to make far-reaching political commitments, as for example in its Presidency conclusions of 20 June 2008, in which the heads of State and government called for stronger EU financial support to developing countries, or to commit, at the same time, to the necessary budgetary suggestions and actions when there is an obvious contradiction with the funds available under the annual ceilings of the current MFF;

| 28. | Reiterates its assessment of the urgent need for a massive and concrete mobilisation of the European Union to tackle soaring food prices and the resulting food crisis and reiterates the need to respond in an sound budgetary way; recalls that the available margins under heading 2 cannot be spent for heading 4 purposes since the current ceiling of heading 4 does not suffice to finance the instrument without jeopardising existing priorities; considers that the two branches of the budgetary authority should make every effort and examine all possibilities provided for in the IIA to finance the amounts foreseen for food aid under heading 4; nevertheless recalls that the final decision on the financial envelope will be taken in the course of the annual budgetary procedure, and will be linked to an overall assessment of current instruments for cooperation policy with developing countries; |
| --- | --- |

28.

Reiterates its assessment of the urgent need for a massive and concrete mobilisation of the European Union to tackle soaring food prices and the resulting food crisis and reiterates the need to respond in an sound budgetary way; recalls that the available margins under heading 2 cannot be spent for heading 4 purposes since the current ceiling of heading 4 does not suffice to finance the instrument without jeopardising existing priorities; considers that the two branches of the budgetary authority should make every effort and examine all possibilities provided for in the IIA to finance the amounts foreseen for food aid under heading 4; nevertheless recalls that the final decision on the financial envelope will be taken in the course of the annual budgetary procedure, and will be linked to an overall assessment of current instruments for cooperation policy with developing countries;

| 29. | Continues to count support for the peace process in Palestine and for Kosovo amongst its unchanged key priorities for which sufficient resources have to be entered in the EU budget; notes, however, that such an adequate level of funding might require re-programming under heading 4, with some budgetary compensation being provided by other budget lines; recalls the importance of a functioning public administration which is needed to guarantee the special care necessary to ensure proper use of EU funds; |
| --- | --- |

29.

Continues to count support for the peace process in Palestine and for Kosovo amongst its unchanged key priorities for which sufficient resources have to be entered in the EU budget; notes, however, that such an adequate level of funding might require re-programming under heading 4, with some budgetary compensation being provided by other budget lines; recalls the importance of a functioning public administration which is needed to guarantee the special care necessary to ensure proper use of EU funds;

| 30. | Welcomes the reinstatement of resources on the line for financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community; also welcomes the support for the exhumation, identification and return of remains of missing persons in Cyprus; |
| --- | --- |

30.

Welcomes the reinstatement of resources on the line for financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community; also welcomes the support for the exhumation, identification and return of remains of missing persons in Cyprus;

| 31. | Supports the police mission launched under the European Security and Defence Policy in Kosovo; however, asks the Commission to provide a concrete plan and timetable for the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX), in particular with respect to the take-over of tasks from the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and the related human resources needs and costs as well as the cooperation with the European Commission Liaison Office in Kosovo (ECLO); further, asks the Commission to provide detailed information on the training given to the local forces; |
| --- | --- |

31.

Supports the police mission launched under the European Security and Defence Policy in Kosovo; however, asks the Commission to provide a concrete plan and timetable for the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX), in particular with respect to the take-over of tasks from the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and the related human resources needs and costs as well as the cooperation with the European Commission Liaison Office in Kosovo (ECLO); further, asks the Commission to provide detailed information on the training given to the local forces;

| 32. | Underlines its will to assist Georgia in its lengthy and costly reconstruction process, and to take an active part in finding an appropriate financial solution as expressed in its resolution of 3 September 2008 on the situation in Georgia (7); therefore urges the Commission to present proposals fulfilling the EU’s commitments; insists, therefore, on observance of the politically and financially sound principle of new financing for new needs; notes in this connection the Commission’s intention to consider the provision of up to EUR 500 million in the period from 2008 to 2010 inclusive and, if necessary, pledge these funds in connection with a donor conference for Georgia; |
| --- | --- |

32.

Underlines its will to assist Georgia in its lengthy and costly reconstruction process, and to take an active part in finding an appropriate financial solution as expressed in its resolution of 3 September 2008 on the situation in Georgia (7); therefore urges the Commission to present proposals fulfilling the EU’s commitments; insists, therefore, on observance of the politically and financially sound principle of new financing for new needs; notes in this connection the Commission’s intention to consider the provision of up to EUR 500 million in the period from 2008 to 2010 inclusive and, if necessary, pledge these funds in connection with a donor conference for Georgia;

7

| 33. | Notes the growing importance of the Energy Community and welcomes Turkey’s intention to join it; is of the opinion that the entry of Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia into the Energy Community should be facilitated and the energy solidarity measures between its members should be developed; awaits the Commission report to be presented in 2009 on the experiences gained from the implementation of Council Decision 2006/500/EC of 29 May 2006 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (8); |
| --- | --- |

33.

Notes the growing importance of the Energy Community and welcomes Turkey’s intention to join it; is of the opinion that the entry of Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia into the Energy Community should be facilitated and the energy solidarity measures between its members should be developed; awaits the Commission report to be presented in 2009 on the experiences gained from the implementation of Council Decision 2006/500/EC of 29 May 2006 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (8);

8

| 34. | Points out that the EU priority of combating climate change has also an external component and that relevant activities, such as those in connection with the Global Climate Change Alliance, are to be financed under heading 4; |
| --- | --- |

34.

Points out that the EU priority of combating climate change has also an external component and that relevant activities, such as those in connection with the Global Climate Change Alliance, are to be financed under heading 4;

| 35. | Underlines that the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has proven to be an effective financing mechanism but deplores that the Global Fund is not an implementing agent; reminds the Commission that in order to effectively implement Global Fund grants, increased financial resources will need to be spent on technical assistance; |
| --- | --- |

35.

Underlines that the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has proven to be an effective financing mechanism but deplores that the Global Fund is not an implementing agent; reminds the Commission that in order to effectively implement Global Fund grants, increased financial resources will need to be spent on technical assistance;

| 36. | Reminds Council that the Emergency Aid Reserve is supposed to finance unforeseen emergency needs and believes not only that the appropriations on this budget line are justified but also that the deletion of these appropriations would jeopardise the EU’s capacity to react properly to a possible crisis situation in the early months of 2009; therefore restores the PDB for the Emergency Aid Reserve, also in respect of Point 25 of the IIA; |
| --- | --- |

36.

Reminds Council that the Emergency Aid Reserve is supposed to finance unforeseen emergency needs and believes not only that the appropriations on this budget line are justified but also that the deletion of these appropriations would jeopardise the EU’s capacity to react properly to a possible crisis situation in the early months of 2009; therefore restores the PDB for the Emergency Aid Reserve, also in respect of Point 25 of the IIA;

On heading 5

On heading 5

| 37. | Will, as a general principle, restore Council’s cuts of PDB figures in this heading; notes, however, that it still has some open questions regarding specific aspects of the Commission’s allocation of staff among administrative support and coordination functions and possibilities of redeployment, and the need for further information on its building policy; has decided to put some amounts in the reserve in order to make sure that it obtains answers to those questions in due time; |
| --- | --- |

37.

Will, as a general principle, restore Council’s cuts of PDB figures in this heading; notes, however, that it still has some open questions regarding specific aspects of the Commission’s allocation of staff among administrative support and coordination functions and possibilities of redeployment, and the need for further information on its building policy; has decided to put some amounts in the reserve in order to make sure that it obtains answers to those questions in due time;

| 38. | Points out that in PDB 2009 an overall amount of EUR 1 120 million is budgeted to finance administrative expenditure outside heading 5; considers this amount quite substantial; |
| --- | --- |

38.

Points out that in PDB 2009 an overall amount of EUR 1 120 million is budgeted to finance administrative expenditure outside heading 5; considers this amount quite substantial;

| 39. | Underlines the fact that administrative spending continues to rise well above the average EU level of inflation, leading to concerns as to whether taxpayers are getting value for money; calls on the Commission to launch a fundamental review of all aspects of administrative expenditure reporting on progress since the 2000 reforms, paying particular attention to the impact of the 2004 enlargement and the need to continue the search for efficiency savings; requests that this review be made available by 31 July 2009. |
| --- | --- |

39.

Underlines the fact that administrative spending continues to rise well above the average EU level of inflation, leading to concerns as to whether taxpayers are getting value for money; calls on the Commission to launch a fundamental review of all aspects of administrative expenditure reporting on progress since the 2000 reforms, paying particular attention to the impact of the 2004 enlargement and the need to continue the search for efficiency savings; requests that this review be made available by 31 July 2009.

| 40. | Is, in this context, concerned about the fact that the amounts taken from operational programme envelopes in order to finance executive agencies are continually increasing and have already reached a substantial level, financing over 1 300 staff in 2009; would like to get a clearer picture of the effects of the creation of executive agencies and the ongoing extensions of their tasks on those parent Directorates General which were responsible for the implementation of the relevant programmes before the executive agencies took over; |
| --- | --- |

40.

Is, in this context, concerned about the fact that the amounts taken from operational programme envelopes in order to finance executive agencies are continually increasing and have already reached a substantial level, financing over 1 300 staff in 2009; would like to get a clearer picture of the effects of the creation of executive agencies and the ongoing extensions of their tasks on those parent Directorates General which were responsible for the implementation of the relevant programmes before the executive agencies took over;

| 41. | Notes that current data has shown that, in the Commission’s Directorates General, the ratio between staff in administrative support and coordination functions and those which perform operational tasks can vary significantly; asks the Commission for an analysis of the reasons for these discrepancies; |
| --- | --- |

41.

Notes that current data has shown that, in the Commission’s Directorates General, the ratio between staff in administrative support and coordination functions and those which perform operational tasks can vary significantly; asks the Commission for an analysis of the reasons for these discrepancies;

| 42. | Expects to be fully informed of all developments in connection with the so-called ‘Holmquist’ staff reform within the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

42.

Expects to be fully informed of all developments in connection with the so-called ‘Holmquist’ staff reform within the Commission;

| 43. | Asks the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) to continue its efforts to streamline and shorten competition cycles; considers that the appropriate human resources should be provided to EPSO in support of the efforts undertaken to improve its internal procedures and methods and accelerate the management of reserve lists in order to guarantee that it can provide the institutions with the appropriate staff according to needs, including the adequacy of admissibility criteria, notably for AST posts; |
| --- | --- |

43.

Asks the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) to continue its efforts to streamline and shorten competition cycles; considers that the appropriate human resources should be provided to EPSO in support of the efforts undertaken to improve its internal procedures and methods and accelerate the management of reserve lists in order to guarantee that it can provide the institutions with the appropriate staff according to needs, including the adequacy of admissibility criteria, notably for AST posts;

| 44. | Calls on the Council to present a calendar for the negotiations with Parliament concerning the Commission’s proposals on Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (OLAF) to strengthen the efficiency of the European Anti-fraud Office and to clarify the legal framework of its mission; |
| --- | --- |

44.

Calls on the Council to present a calendar for the negotiations with Parliament concerning the Commission’s proposals on Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (OLAF) to strengthen the efficiency of the European Anti-fraud Office and to clarify the legal framework of its mission;

| 45. | Regrets the lack of consistency and coherence regularly noticeable in the communication policy implemented by the Commission’s Directorates General; is in favour of the development of a coherent and recognisable ‘EU identity’ to be used in all communication measures; would therefore like to encourage the individual services of the Commission to fine-tune and coordinate all information and communication activities carried out at their level; |
| --- | --- |

45.

Regrets the lack of consistency and coherence regularly noticeable in the communication policy implemented by the Commission’s Directorates General; is in favour of the development of a coherent and recognisable ‘EU identity’ to be used in all communication measures; would therefore like to encourage the individual services of the Commission to fine-tune and coordinate all information and communication activities carried out at their level;

| 46. | Calls on the institutions to coordinate their efforts systematically with a view to:






  — | making information accessible to citizens on their rights and on how they are acted on in practice in the Member States, |
| --- | --- | --- |

46.

Calls on the institutions to coordinate their efforts systematically with a view to:

—

making information accessible to citizens on their rights and on how they are acted on in practice in the Member States,

| — | improving the accessibility and transparency of European law through efficient search tools, through consolidation of texts and by using the best available technical format for at-source formatting of directives, regulations and decisions, |
| --- | --- |

—

improving the accessibility and transparency of European law through efficient search tools, through consolidation of texts and by using the best available technical format for at-source formatting of directives, regulations and decisions,

| — | establishing, on the basis of resources available at both European and national level, a digital library on the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

establishing, on the basis of resources available at both European and national level, a digital library on the European Union;

| 47. | Welcomes the reform of the European Schools’ system recently launched by the Commission but urges the Member States to meet their commitments according to the existing agreements; draws attention to Point 47 of the IIA according to which the authorisation of the budgetary authority is required for the creation of new schools having implications for the budget; |
| --- | --- |

47.

Welcomes the reform of the European Schools’ system recently launched by the Commission but urges the Member States to meet their commitments according to the existing agreements; draws attention to Point 47 of the IIA according to which the authorisation of the budgetary authority is required for the creation of new schools having implications for the budget;

| 48. | Underlines the importance of respecting Point 47 of IIA; asks the Commission to work with the budgetary authority on the definition of a proper detailed procedure for its application |
| --- | --- |

48.

Underlines the importance of respecting Point 47 of IIA; asks the Commission to work with the budgetary authority on the definition of a proper detailed procedure for its application

| 49. | Calls on the Commission to present the report on the possible solutions concerning the EU gas security and diversification mechanism in the NG3 corridor, including inter alia the possible role of the European Investment Bank in purchasing gas in bulk from non-traditional supplier states (having less than 5 % share of the EU market) in the NG3 corridor or in facilitating its purchase, either through direct purchase or through the creation of a purchase entity; |
| --- | --- |

49.

Calls on the Commission to present the report on the possible solutions concerning the EU gas security and diversification mechanism in the NG3 corridor, including inter alia the possible role of the European Investment Bank in purchasing gas in bulk from non-traditional supplier states (having less than 5 % share of the EU market) in the NG3 corridor or in facilitating its purchase, either through direct purchase or through the creation of a purchase entity;

On agencies

On agencies

| 50. | Welcomes the Commission’s decision to finally follow the requests of the budgetary authority and take assigned revenues into account when drawing up the PDB for the decentralised agencies for 2009; considers that this is undoubtedly a step towards more budgetary transparency; reiterates, however, in line with its amendments to the agencies’ budgetary remarks of the Budget 2008, that those agencies depending to a large extent on revenue generated by fees should still be able to use the instrument of assigned revenues to give them the budgetary flexibility they need; |
| --- | --- |

50.

Welcomes the Commission’s decision to finally follow the requests of the budgetary authority and take assigned revenues into account when drawing up the PDB for the decentralised agencies for 2009; considers that this is undoubtedly a step towards more budgetary transparency; reiterates, however, in line with its amendments to the agencies’ budgetary remarks of the Budget 2008, that those agencies depending to a large extent on revenue generated by fees should still be able to use the instrument of assigned revenues to give them the budgetary flexibility they need;

| 51. | Welcomes the Commission’s communication of 11 March 2008, entitled ‘European Agencies — The way forward’ (COM(2008)0135), noting, in particular, the Commission’s commitment to conducting an evaluation of regulatory agencies during 2009; requests that that evaluation pay particular attention to examining the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the agencies’ work, identifying commensurate efficiency savings within the Commission’s own services as work is outsourced to agencies, and that it be completed by 30 June 2009; |
| --- | --- |

51.

Welcomes the Commission’s communication of 11 March 2008, entitled ‘European Agencies — The way forward’ (COM(2008)0135), noting, in particular, the Commission’s commitment to conducting an evaluation of regulatory agencies during 2009; requests that that evaluation pay particular attention to examining the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the agencies’ work, identifying commensurate efficiency savings within the Commission’s own services as work is outsourced to agencies, and that it be completed by 30 June 2009;

| 52. | Points out the fact that smaller sized agencies tend to have a very high share of staff (50 % or more) who deal with the internal administration of the agency itself; would consider the cost-efficiency of small agencies to be one of the questions the interinstitutional working group on the future of decentralised agencies that is due to be set up in Autumn 2008 should assess; |
| --- | --- |

52.

Points out the fact that smaller sized agencies tend to have a very high share of staff (50 % or more) who deal with the internal administration of the agency itself; would consider the cost-efficiency of small agencies to be one of the questions the interinstitutional working group on the future of decentralised agencies that is due to be set up in Autumn 2008 should assess;

| 53. | Has taken note of the EUR 290 million surplus of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market in the current financial year; would like the Commission to reflect on whether it might be appropriate that any excess income of the Office, being a direct consequence of the Internal Market, should flow back into the EU budget; |
| --- | --- |

53.

Has taken note of the EUR 290 million surplus of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market in the current financial year; would like the Commission to reflect on whether it might be appropriate that any excess income of the Office, being a direct consequence of the Internal Market, should flow back into the EU budget;

| 54. | Underlines the fact that the Euratom Supply Agency, as created by the Euratom Treaty, is an independent agency the subsidies for which should be presented in the EU budget in a transparent way; |
| --- | --- |

54.

Underlines the fact that the Euratom Supply Agency, as created by the Euratom Treaty, is an independent agency the subsidies for which should be presented in the EU budget in a transparent way;

On pilot projects and preparatory actions

On pilot projects and preparatory actions

| 55. | Recalls that the IIA allows for a total amount for pilot projects of up to EUR 40 million in any budget year and for a total amount for preparatory actions of up to EUR 100 million out of which a maximum of EUR 50 million can be allocated to new preparatory actions; |
| --- | --- |

55.

Recalls that the IIA allows for a total amount for pilot projects of up to EUR 40 million in any budget year and for a total amount for preparatory actions of up to EUR 100 million out of which a maximum of EUR 50 million can be allocated to new preparatory actions;

| 56. | Considers these projects an indispensable tool for Parliament to initiate new policies that are in the interest of European citizens; has analysed a series of interesting proposals out of which only a small number could be entered into the Budget 2009 due to the constraints of IIA and MFF ceilings; |
| --- | --- |

56.

Considers these projects an indispensable tool for Parliament to initiate new policies that are in the interest of European citizens; has analysed a series of interesting proposals out of which only a small number could be entered into the Budget 2009 due to the constraints of IIA and MFF ceilings;

| 57. | Insists that those proposed projects and actions which have not been included in Budget 2009 due to the fact that, according to the Commission, they are already covered by an existing legal base should really be implemented under this legal base and asks the Commission to report also on those proposals within its report on the pilot projects and preparatory actions; expects the Commission to make every effort in this direction regardless of whether or not the projects and actions will eventually be explicitly mentioned in the relevant remarks of the legal bases of Budget 2009; intends to monitor closely the implementation of these projects and actions under their legal bases during the financial year 2009; |
| --- | --- |

57.

Insists that those proposed projects and actions which have not been included in Budget 2009 due to the fact that, according to the Commission, they are already covered by an existing legal base should really be implemented under this legal base and asks the Commission to report also on those proposals within its report on the pilot projects and preparatory actions; expects the Commission to make every effort in this direction regardless of whether or not the projects and actions will eventually be explicitly mentioned in the relevant remarks of the legal bases of Budget 2009; intends to monitor closely the implementation of these projects and actions under their legal bases during the financial year 2009;

*

* *

| 58. | Takes note of the opinions adopted by the specialised committees as contained in report A6-0398/2008; |
| --- | --- |

58.

Takes note of the opinions adopted by the specialised committees as contained in report A6-0398/2008;

| 59. | Instructs its President to forward this resolution, together with the amendments and proposed modifications to Section III of the draft general budget, to the Council and Commission, and also to the other institutions and bodies concerned. |
| --- | --- |

59.

Instructs its President to forward this resolution, together with the amendments and proposed modifications to Section III of the draft general budget, to the Council and Commission, and also to the other institutions and bodies concerned.

---

(1)  OJ L 253, 7.10.2000, p. 42.

1

(2)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

3

(4)  Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0174.

4

(5)  Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0175.

5

(6)  Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0335.

6

(7)  Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0396.

7

(8)  OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 15.

8

---

Thursday 23 October 2008ANNEX

STATEMENTS AGREED AT THE CONCILIATION OF 17 JULY 2008

1.   Structural and Cohesion Funds and rural development 2007-2013 programmes

‘The European Parliament and the Council attach the greatest importance to a smooth and good implementation of the operational programmes and projects presented by Member States in relation with the new Structural and Cohesion Funds and rural development programmes for the 2007-2013 period.

In order to avoid repeating experiences from the early phase of the 2000-2006 programming period, acknowledging the approval of most of these operational programmes and projects the European Parliament and the Council consider that it is now very important to ensure smooth and effective implementation by approving the corresponding Management and Control Systems as soon as possible, within the timeframe established by the Regulations.

The European Parliament and the Council will therefore monitor rigorously and on a regular basis the state of approval of these Management and Control Systems in the Member States, together with the state of approval of Major Projects.

To this end, the Commission is requested to continue to provide regularly specific monitoring tools during the budgetary procedure.

The Commission is also asked to present if necessary an updating of its payment forecasts for 2009 at the latest by the end of October 2008.’

2.   Recruitment in relation with the 2004 and 2007 enlargement

2.

Recruitment in relation with the 2004 and 2007 enlargement

‘The European Parliament and the Council again stress the importance of full recruitment related to the 2004 and 2007 enlargement posts and insist that all efforts should be made by the institutions and specifically by EPSO to ensure that the necessary action is taken to speed up the whole process of filling these posts with officials. The criteria should be as stipulated in Article 27 of the Staff Regulation and aiming to arrive at the broadest possible geographical proportional basis as soon as possible.

The European Parliament and the Council intend to continue to monitor closely the ongoing recruitment process. To this effect, they request each institution and EPSO to report twice a year, in March and October, on the state of affairs regarding recruitments in relation with the 2004 and 2007 enlargement.’

3.   EU Solidarity Fund

3.

EU Solidarity Fund

‘The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission confirm the importance of ensuring a smooth process for the adoption of decisions on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund. Therefore the European Parliament and the Council welcome the Commission commitment according to which, as from now, every preliminary draft amending budget required by the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund will be solely for that purpose.’

4.   European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and Emergency Aid Reserve

4.

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and Emergency Aid Reserve

‘The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission confirm the importance of ensuring a rapid procedure with due respect of the Interinstitutional Agreement for the adoption of decisions on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and of the use of the Emergency Aid Reserve.’

5.   Declaration on implementation budget in 2009

5.

Declaration on implementation budget in 2009

‘In order to ensure a smooth running of the implementation of the budget during 2009 to allow to reduce any difficulty deriving from the end of term of the European Parliament and the recess period for European elections, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree on the following points:

Transfers

The Commission will ensure to introduce all requests for transfers on good time for the last ordinary meeting of the Committee on Budgets of the European Parliament, foreseen for the 27 April 2009.

In case this date cannot be met, all requests made after the date will be dealt with by the committee, following appropriate communication under an extraordinary procedure.

Amending budgets

The Council and the Commission take note that urgent and unforeseen decisions might occur during the electoral period; a delegation of competences from the plenary to the committee on budgets could avoid unnecessary delays.’

6.   Update of the financial programming under Heading 5

6.

Update of the financial programming under Heading 5

‘The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission invite the Secretaries General of all Institutions to present an updated report on the financial programming of administration expenditure under Heading 5 by the end of October.’

UNILATERAL DECLARATIONS

1.   Payment appropriations

1.

Payment appropriations

| ‘1.1. | The Council asks the Commission to submit an amending budget if the appropriations entered in the 2009 budget are insufficient to cover expenditure under sub-Heading 1a (Competitiveness for growth and employment), sub-Heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment), Heading 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) and Heading 4 (EU as a global partner).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1.1.

The Council asks the Commission to submit an amending budget if the appropriations entered in the 2009 budget are insufficient to cover expenditure under sub-Heading 1a (Competitiveness for growth and employment), sub-Heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment), Heading 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) and Heading 4 (EU as a global partner).’

| ‘1.2. | The European Parliament considers that during the procedure, it will evaluate the needs for payments across all headings for the whole year, based on the forecasts available in the different stages of the procedure.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1.2.

The European Parliament considers that during the procedure, it will evaluate the needs for payments across all headings for the whole year, based on the forecasts available in the different stages of the procedure.’

2.   Structural and Cohesion Funds and rural development 2007-2013 programmes

2.

Structural and Cohesion Funds and rural development 2007-2013 programmes

The Commission has been asked to present by the end of October 2008 updated payments forecasts for 2009. Given the degree of uncertainty concerning implementation conditions in Member States, for such an updating the Commission will have to rely also on updated payment forecasts to be provided by Member States.

3.   Evaluation of agencies

3.

Evaluation of agencies

| ‘3.1. | The Council welcomes the intention of the Commission to launch a thorough evaluation of the regulatory agencies as announced in its Communication ‘European Agencies — the way forward’ from 11 March 2008. It also welcomes the Commission commitment not to make proposals for new regulatory agencies until the conclusion of the evaluation with the exceptions referred to in the abovementioned communication from the Commission.
  The Council and the Commission agree that this evaluation should allow them to assess to what extent the regulatory agencies are an adequate tool, in the context of good governance and sound financial management, for implementing European policies at present and in the future. To this end the evaluation should allow for the comparability of the results in a horizontal manner, when possible on the basis of common indicators.
  Moreover, the evaluation should especially address the following issues:






  — | the rationale, relevance and purpose of the agencies, in accordance with good governance; |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘3.1.

The Council welcomes the intention of the Commission to launch a thorough evaluation of the regulatory agencies as announced in its Communication ‘European Agencies — the way forward’ from 11 March 2008. It also welcomes the Commission commitment not to make proposals for new regulatory agencies until the conclusion of the evaluation with the exceptions referred to in the abovementioned communication from the Commission.

The Council and the Commission agree that this evaluation should allow them to assess to what extent the regulatory agencies are an adequate tool, in the context of good governance and sound financial management, for implementing European policies at present and in the future. To this end the evaluation should allow for the comparability of the results in a horizontal manner, when possible on the basis of common indicators.

Moreover, the evaluation should especially address the following issues:

—

the rationale, relevance and purpose of the agencies, in accordance with good governance;

| — | the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of the agencies’ work, including determining factors such as programming, reporting and monitoring mechanisms; |
| --- | --- |

—

the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of the agencies’ work, including determining factors such as programming, reporting and monitoring mechanisms;

| — | the budgetary process and accountability of the agencies; |
| --- | --- |

—

the budgetary process and accountability of the agencies;

The evaluation should also aim to assess:

| — | the coherence of the objectives and activities of the agencies with the priorities and objectives of EU policies; |
| --- | --- |

—

the coherence of the objectives and activities of the agencies with the priorities and objectives of EU policies;

| — | the transparency of the agencies’ work; |
| --- | --- |

—

the transparency of the agencies’ work;

| — | the relationship between the agencies and the Commission, and where appropriate the link between regulatory agencies and national ones; |
| --- | --- |

—

the relationship between the agencies and the Commission, and where appropriate the link between regulatory agencies and national ones;

| — | the management of the budgetary resources of the agencies. |
| --- | --- |

—

the management of the budgetary resources of the agencies.

This evaluation would also provide to the budgetary authority adequate tools and means to assess, in the context of the allocation of the Community contribution during the annual budgetary procedure, the comparability of performance targets, administrative and operational expenditure, evolution of the staff (types and vacancy rate) and impact of the size of the agency.

The Commission intends to take into consideration the position of the Council when defining the scope and terms of reference of this evaluation in order to ensure that the aspects of greatest interest to each institution are covered, especially in the budgetary field. External independent expertise is required in order to ensure reliable, robust and complete results.’

| ‘3.2. | The European Parliament welcomes the intention of the Commission to launch a thorough evaluation of the decentralised agencies as announced in its Communication ‘European Agencies — the way forward’ from 11 March 2008.
  It considers an interinstitutional working group a viable structure for the constructive and output oriented debate that is necessary for this purpose and underlines that all major actors from the institutional and legislative sphere as well as representatives of the budgetary authority have to participate in this working group to guarantee satisfactory results.
  The European Parliament welcomes, in particular, the launching of a thorough evaluation of the decentralised agencies as described in the Communication. This evaluation should allow to assess to what extent the decentralised agencies are an adequate tool, in the context of good governance and sound financial management, for implementing European policies at present and in the future. To this end the evaluation should allow for the comparability of the results in a horizontal manner, when possible on the basis of common indicators.
  The prerogatives of the budgetary authority as safeguarded for the creation of new decentralised agencies under Point 47 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 must be fully preserved in the evaluation and control process concerning already existing agencies.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘3.2.

The European Parliament welcomes the intention of the Commission to launch a thorough evaluation of the decentralised agencies as announced in its Communication ‘European Agencies — the way forward’ from 11 March 2008.

It considers an interinstitutional working group a viable structure for the constructive and output oriented debate that is necessary for this purpose and underlines that all major actors from the institutional and legislative sphere as well as representatives of the budgetary authority have to participate in this working group to guarantee satisfactory results.

The European Parliament welcomes, in particular, the launching of a thorough evaluation of the decentralised agencies as described in the Communication. This evaluation should allow to assess to what extent the decentralised agencies are an adequate tool, in the context of good governance and sound financial management, for implementing European policies at present and in the future. To this end the evaluation should allow for the comparability of the results in a horizontal manner, when possible on the basis of common indicators.

The prerogatives of the budgetary authority as safeguarded for the creation of new decentralised agencies under Point 47 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 must be fully preserved in the evaluation and control process concerning already existing agencies.’

4.   Follow-up of point 32 of the conclusions of the European Council of 19-20 June 2008

4.

Follow-up of point 32 of the conclusions of the European Council of 19-20 June 2008

‘The European Parliament recalls that the financing of new measures must respect the principles laid down in the Financial Regulation (notably specification) and in the IIA of 17 May 2006 (notably the ceilings of the different headings).

It invites the Commission to present the necessary proposals for their financing in the framework of the 2008-2009 budgetary procedures.’

---