Item 9

Fees Schedule and Fees Collected

The attached fee schedule, Enclosure 2,
07 DoD Directive 5400.7, establishes standard
costs collectable by DoD Agencies. The
fees policy is currently undergoing formal
revision to eliminate minimum fees and
thereby conform to the currently encouraged

discretionary practice.

$226,675.59 was collected from the public
for making records available. (See Item 10B

for agency totals)

16



Item 5(b)

Statutes Invoked on Appeal Determinations

DoD
* - Statute Number of Times by Agency Total
S zZ<
~ ee <
a & & R o< 4 an asa
Hee S888 8222 &
Title 18 U.S.C. 798 ~- = ee ee ee ee 26 = 26
Title 50 U.S.C. 403 to- - =e ee eee ee 7 28
18 U.S.C. 1905 - = - WU - le ee ee 12
Public Law 86-36 ee. ae 29
Atomic Energy Act low -- - +--+ -+- +--+ 7 = 1
of 1954
Agency Totals 2 - - ll - 1 -'- - - - 8 - 96

10



Item 10A
Availability of Records

(New categories or segregable portions of records now being released)

Corps of Engineers Appraisal Report - - DLA

20



CONTENTS

Page
Item 1 -- Initial Determinations Resulting in not Providing 1
-. All or a Portion of Record Requested
Item 2 -- Initial Determinations
. (a) Exemptions Invoked 2
(b) Statutes Invoked 3
(c) Other Reasons 4
Item 3  -- Initial Denial Officials by Participation
A. Exemption Denials 6
B. Other Authority Denials 7
Item 4 -- Number of Appeals and Results 8
Item 5 -- Appeal Determinations
(a) Exemptions Invoked 9
(b) Statutes Invoked 10
(c) Other Reasons 11
Item 6 -- Participation of Appellate Authorities 12
Item 7 -- Court Opinions and Action Taken 14
Item 8 -- FOIA Implementation Rules and Regulations 15
Item 9 -- Fees Schedule and Fees Collected 16
Item 10 -- Administrative Efforts
A. Availability of Records 20
B. Calendar Year Costs and Fees Collected 21
C. ‘Time Limit Extensions by Agency 24
D. Internal Memoranda (number and availability) 25
E. Other Information or Recommendations on
. Administering FOIA 26

Item 11 -- FOIA Instr@etional and Educational Efforts 27



5400.7 (Hnel <)

ano Feb 14, 75
a UNIFORM AGENCY FEES FOR SEARCH AND DUPLICATION UNDER
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AMENDMENTS
P. L. 93-502
Introduction

This enclosure describes fees for search and duplication, It is not
intended to substitute for any schedule of fees or a policy of not to
charge a fee established in connection with the issuance of publica-
tions or other materials in the routine course of business of a
component.

SCHEDULE OF FEES

Duplication

Publications, Forms and Reports

r~
Shelf stock of printed or microfiche medium (requesters may be
furnished more than one copy of a publication or form if it does not
deplete stock levels below projected planned usage).
*Minimum fee, per request... ..... + +++ + $2,00
plus
Forms, per copy. . er 05
Publications, per printed page ee -01
Microfiche, per fiche. . . 2 1/1 ee eee ete 06
Reports, per printed page. . . .05
(Examples: Cost of 20 forms, $3. 00; ‘cost “of a ‘printed
publication with 100 pages, $3.00; cost of a microfiche
publication consisting of 10 fiche, $2.60)
. Office Copy Reproduction (when shelf stock is not available)
“ * Minimum charge up to six reproduced pages. . . . . $ 2.00
*Minimum charge, first fiche... . 2... - + 5.00
Each additional page ...... rr .05
Each additional fiche . 2 2 2 6 ee ee ee tt es -10
Other Issuances
~ ther sssuances
* Minimum charge up to six pages... . .- +. + + - $2.00
Each additional page ©... 6 6 eee ee ee ee 05

* Under Revision 17



2

[_ss-suatazz BT 9e 00°%T 00°1z LUSH 00°269‘8E |< s ortand Boas peavettos amowy
. - - — ae _ - ——
OT9*Ezs*s zs0'e Ozt* ys Tet't ocs‘T ety “Sze 79€ ‘% ‘AI-I go ©3803 Te30L
= iavemny ‘A
6TE SYST 8 4£9 9s Le 0%6 ‘8 9S eqs TVEOL °9
£56'8S * ~ - - gtz‘t - ‘ . (1239 ‘zeandaoo |
‘T9Ae822 ‘TeIsod se Yons sweat 30 Suz320d
22 ArvqumyoA) #3809 Suzze1edo 20479 “gE ;
790°6T 8 at zt st €95‘T aa (2) (1) 30 3Sz) Pweuseag (£) i
9ST'6 - zz - St $s9 € a9en (2)
ost'29 ut 8sz ” zzz 925s oy yeuozaezedg (1) |
IL —_ 8380) Buyaaodsy *y “AL
— _ — —
Tes‘ 1zs 4s SBE‘ mre 0z zz L682 €0z #3809 29430 30 TeIOL “2
T6S ‘Sz s - - Lot 9nste - sprovey parayag 30 380) “a
oge'y - oT - - osz - BoFIDNPordey BY2TIOIITH *D
9SeTIT 69 Tes 0z €s "8e'9 09 81809 woy3anpoadey
WSL6LE - ong‘ eve - - £60‘ 9T €oT 80) PUFL YDIwEs IeInducy
a _ 83809 pereTsy ose) 30030 “mir
_
és Teel £16‘ 260622 SIt'T BET Tz *88z Sot‘z 83809 z0yI0 Jo TeI0L “A 4
36 BS ET = Ti eos <4 (187) 2382 peeqzeng *g
629'S9R*E Tee‘Z Lz" E8T Str 66 69S “OFZ £29'T DIT pur @1I 30 TeI0l “a |
By mee Tee 'z €62'Ss StUT 166 29269 Sty't TwI03 3809 anoyueR (9)
220°€6 oor - set 906 s80‘% 99 sdond TATE 2020 (5) :
9€S‘0L 69 - Set - ozs ‘8 96 lead mxog ¥ “802109 (4)
196 *9TZ 866 - ez 19 HEE SST "ee Teaoadde 9 wofzeutpz009 (£) ,
Sog*sot 7 Tes‘€ €£0€ - 6L6°L 26S mrt 3 niet ® |
‘ “ 0 9% ciaeas 6LT 3 !
BOT‘OEZ 184 299° TS 60z (ores 8 903) Ar08eavo ka :
Sinoyure pelewy3se jo 3809 *D
LOT T60°E 986‘c7T LOE ‘TST a9z (pexeprenos seper8) savoduen 30 3809
600° S0Z 09 98°6 610° s1vekuee perretieg
= 83809 qouvge264 sat
7 T16'st (402983 3802 x e3eenbe1 Jo ‘oN) ~ |
: pessesorg S2eenbey euyInog .
‘Wi0L vaoa YSN yng vac via sia anno 1800

SAILIALLOV ONILHOdTY



5400.7 (Encl 2)
Feb 14, 75

c. The incremental cost of collecting the fees would be
an unduly large part of the receipts from the activity;

d. The request emanates from a representative of the
public information media seeking a reasonable number of records.

2. A refusal to waive charges by the official responsible for
the initial decision on the request for the record may be appealed
to the head of the component or his designee for purposes of final
appeal.

Collections

1. Normally, collection of charges and fees will be made
in advance of rendering the service. In some instances, it may be
more practical to collect charges and fees at the time of conveying
the service or property to the recipient, but only in those instances
where the request specifically states that whatever cost involved
will be acceptable or acceptable up to specified limit that covers
anticipated costs.

2. Collection of scheduled fees and charges will normally
be deposited to Miscellaneous Receipts of the Treasury.

3. Search fees are assessable even when no records
responsive to the request, or no records not exempt from disclosure
are found, provided the requester is advised of the requirement at
the time the estimated charges are presented tc the requester for
approval and he agrees to incur the costs of search.

19



Item 7

Court Opinions and Action Taken

No court opinions or orders were
issued against Department of
Defense agencies in 1977 giving
rise to a proceeding under
Section 552(a)(4)(F) of Title 5,

U.S.C.

14



Description of Other Reasons

Transferred Request (Appeal):

This category applies when responsibility for making a determination or
a decision on categories listed below is shifted from one Component to
another Component/Agency.

Lack of Records:

This category covers situations wherein the requester is advised the
agency has no record, or has no statutory obligation to create a record.

Failure of Requester to Reasonably Describe Record:

This category is specifically based on Section 552(a)(3)(A) of the FOIA.

Other Failures by Requesters to Comply with Published Rules and/or

Directives:
This category is based on Section 552(a) (3) (B) of the FOIA and includes

instances of failure to follow published rules concerning time, place,
fees and procedures.

Request (Appeal) Withdrawn by Requester:

This category covers situations when the requester asks an agency to
disregard the request (or appeal) or pursues the request outside FOIA
channels.



New employees were briefed on FOIA as part of orienta-
tion as well as continuous training on FOIA by Primary
Level Field Activities.

The bulk of DMA's effort with regard to employee train-
ing was directed toward dissemination of useful infor-
mation to the greatest number of employees possible.
This was accomplished by publication of articles con-
cerning the Act in all DMA Headquarters and Component
newspapers, bulletins, etc. In addition, copies of
other relevant publications, such as Commanders

Digest, were widely distributed throughout the Agency.
DMA Headquarters and Component Counsel and Public Affairs
Officers also assisted in the educational Process by
delivering briefings and lectures to affected personnel
concerning the requirements and implementation of the
Act.

A mandatory annual briefing on Title 5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended by Public Law 93-502, and DoD Directive 5400.7
is conducted for all assigned FOI Representatives.



Item 10 E (Optional)

Other Information (Opinions) or Recommendations
on Administering FOIA

A major problem which often arises in the day-to-day administration
of the Department of Defense FOIA Program concerns the proper
handling of requests for records created by other than U.S. Federal
Executive Branch Agencies. Examples of these requests include:

a. Private corporations seeking information produced by
actual or prospective competitors.

b. Requests for records or information provided by. foreign
governments.

c. Requests for records including technical data which may other-
wise be subject to the provisions of the Export Control Act, depending
on the nationality of the requester.

Another major problem concerns the lack of an adequate DoD education
program for continuing orientation and training of all DoD personnel
concerning FOIA/Privacy Act requirements and objectives. Although this
area of concern is more fully addressed elsewhere under Item 11 (FOIA
Instructional and Educational Efforts), the primary concern stems from
the Congressional prohibition of DoD development of a Department-wide
FOIA training program.

26



Item 2(a)
Exemptions Invoked on Initial Determinations

Exemptions by Number (552(a))

. Reporting
Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total
OsD/JCS 52 5 12 5 37 9 10 0 0 130
DEPT ARMY 131 10 46 93 318 236 698 0 oO} 1,532
DEPT NAVY 42 4 6 98 83 94 190 0 (0) 517
DEPT AF 69 20 50 336 490 381 96 0 O} 1,442
DCA 2 0 0 2 2 0 1) 0 0 6
DCAA 0 1) 3 3 12 2 1 0 0 21
DIA 23 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 25
DIS 0 0 0 0 1 5 10 0 0 16
DLA 0 0 3 50 17 24 7 0 0 101
DMA 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 1 0 0 i) 1
DNA 3 i) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
NSA 129 Oo 157 3 2 10 7 te) 10) 308
DCPA 0 1) 0 10 1 1 i) 0 0 12
DoD Totals 451 39 278 601 964 763 1,019 0 O| 4,115*
. Percent of
Total 10.96 0.95 6.76 14.60 23.43 18.54 24.76 0 0 100%

* Total does not agree with Item 1 because of cases where two or more
exemptions were cited.

2 (Revised March 28, 1978)



Item 1

Initial Determinations Resulting in not
Providing all or a Portion of Record Requested

aa Total Demands Reasons
Completed Completed
. Reporting Public Reportable Statutory

Activity Requests Requests* Exemptions + Other = Total
osD/JCS 782 886 103 351 454
DEPT ARMY 17,376 17, 376%* 1,532 893 2,425
DEPT NAVY 4,215 4,652 418 349 767
DEPT AF 17,173 18,009 782 1,460 2,242
DCA 84 98 6 4 10
DCAA 141 141 17 66 83
DIA 804 838 23 195 218
DIS 62 62 10 37 47
DLA 4,060 4,238 98 1,310 1,408
DMA . 27 29 1 6 7
DNA 29 29 4 7 11
NSA 485 516 144 341 485
DCPA 17 27 12 5 17
DoD Totals 45,255 46,901 3,150 5,024 8,174

* A reportable request is that portion of an FOI request resulting in a
oe single record or group of records pertaining to one general subject area
being acted upon by one IDA who concludes that a single type of deter-
mination applies.

. **x DEPT ARMY could not gather statistics from field activities for this
report.



Agency

Item 8

FOIA Implementation Rules or Regulations

Document Identification

Fed. Reg. Ref.

DoD

OSD/JCS

DEPT ARMY

DEPT NAVY

DEPT AF

DCPA

DoD Directive 5400.7,
14 Feb 1975

DoD Directive 5400.10,
6 Jan 1976

AR 340-17, Change # 1,
24 Jan 1975

SECNAVINST 5720. 42B,
13 Feb 1975

AFR 12-30,
19 Feb 1975

*Interim Message Change 77-1

DCA Instruction 210-225-1,

31 Mar 1975

DCAA Regulation 5410.5,
29 Aug 1977

DIA Regulation 12-39,
18 Feb 1975
Change A, 16 Sep 76

DIS Regulation 01-12,
14 Feb 1975

DLA Regulation 5400.14,
13 Feb 75

DMA Instruction 5400.7A,
12 May 1975

DNA Instruction 5400.7,
22 May 1975

NSA/CSS Regulation 10-9,
3 Mar 1975

DCPA Rules and Regulations

40 F.R. No. 39
26 Feb 1975, pg 8190

To be published

40 F.R. No. 40
27 Feb 1975, pg 8335

40 F.R. No. 56
21 Mar 75, pg 12776

40 F.R. No. 37
24 Feb 75, pg 7901
(not published)

40 F.R. No. 70
10 Apr 75, pg 16203

42 F.R. No. 154
10 Aug 77, pg 40433

40 F.R. No. 34
19 Feb 75, pg 7292
(not published)

40 F.R. No. 34
19 Feb 75, pg 7289

40 F.R. No. 34
19 Feb 75, pg 7282

40 F.R. No. 29
11 Feb 75, pg 6336

40 F.R. No. 124
26 Jun 75, pg 27025

40 F.R. No. 34
19 Feb 75, pg 7303

40 F.R. No. 34
19 Feb 75, pg 10457

* Amendments to Rules or Regulations promulgated in 1977 (attached to
respective agency reports).



Item 2(c)

Other Reasons Cited on Initial Determinations

7 Reporting
ye Activity Category* Total
1 2 3 4 5

OsD/JCS 173 167 8 0 3 351
DEPT ARMY 182 235 79 151 246 893
DEPT NAVY 166 92 18 44 29 349
DEPT AF 334 772 92 146 116 1,460
DCA 0 1 0 0 3 4
DCAA 47 15 1 0 3 66
DIA 56 131 4 4 0 195
DIS 1 36 0 0 0 37
DLA 1,276 19 1 9 5 1,310
DMA . 0 6 0 0 0 6
DNA 3 3 0 0 1 7
NSA 140 197 0 3 1 341
DCPA 0 5 0 0 0 5
DoD Total 2,378 1,679 203 357 407 5,024

* 1. Transferred Request.

2. Lack of Records.
3. Failure of Requester to Reasonably Describe Record.
. 4. Other Failures by Requesters to Comply with Published Rules

and/or Directives.
Request Withdrawn by Requester.
(See following page for description of each category.)

wv



Item 10 B

Calendar Year Costs and Fees Collected

Reporting Annual
Activity Annual Cost * Fees Collected

OsD/JCS $549, 348.00 $1,996.20

DEPT ARMY 1,545,020.00 84,083.94
DEPT NAVY 661,945.00 39,174.69
DEPT AF 1,638, 328.00 59,830.00
DCA 1,029.00 652.71
DCAA 70,463.00 695.05
DIA 149,504.00 1,231.00
2,362.00 5.65

325,418.00 38,692.00

1,830.00 245.17

1,191.00 21.00

574,120.00 14.00

3,052.00 34.18

DoD Total $5,523,610.00 $226,675.59

* Based on reporting procedures established March 16, 1977, to capture a
"best estimate" cost of administering FOIA as amended. The attached
cost outline provides a breakdown of costs by agency.



_ SUMMARY OF |
REPORT TO THE CONGRESS

FREEDOM OF |
INFORMATION

CY 1977

—~

|



B. Other Authority Denials

Number of Officials Categorized Total
Agency by Instances of Participation Officials

Number of Instances

6-10 11-20 21-40 41+

OsD/Jcs : so 11 1 1
DEPT ARMY : 1 2 ()
DEPT NAVY 10 4
DEPT AF not. reported*
DCA 1 0
DCAA : 0

DIA

NSA

DCPA

DoD Total 30 26 23 17

24.8% of the officials participated once.
54.5% of the officials participated 2~10 times.
20.7% of the officials participated 11 or more times.

Other category determination processing is not limited to statutory.
exemption denial authorities.



Item 3

Initial Denial Officials by Participation
(Agency Reports. list Names and Titles)

. A. Exemption Denials

Officials Number of Officials Categorized Total
. Agency Authorized by Instances of Participation Officials
Number of Instances
12-3) 4-5 6-10 1-40 41+
osD/Jcs 32 130° «16 5 2 1 ) 37
DEPT ARMY 24 2 0 1 4 8 9 24
, DEPT NAVY 89 7 il 6 9 5 3 41
DEPT AF 111 30° #17 5 4 7 7 70
DCA 1 t) 0 0 1 0 0 1
DCAA 7 1 3 0 1 0 to) 5
DIA 4 0 1 C0) 1 1 0 3
DIS 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
DLA 52 6 3 2 4 3 0 18
DMA 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
DNA 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
NSA 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
DCPA 1 ) 0 ) 0 1 t') 1
-- DoD Total 346 60 51 20 27 26 20 204

o 59.0% of the 346 IDA authorized were involved in exemption denials.
o 29.4% of the officials participated once.

o 48.1% of the officials participated 2-10 times.

o 22.5% of the officials participated 11 or more times.



DEPT AF

DCA

DCAA

DIA

DIS

and (4) comments on litigation concerning both Acts.
Other efforts planned, developed, and utilized by
headquarters and major field command organizations
include:

a. Many Freedom of Information office personnel
have attended schools and seminars sponsored by the
U.S. Civil Service Commission.

b. All published documents for the Naval Facilities
and Engineering Command are specifically cleared for
impact on the Freedom of Information and Privacy reg-
ulations prior to issuance.

Air Force has developed a 24-minute film designed to
create an interest in and an understanding of the
Freedom of Information Act. The film has received a
wide viewing throughout the Air Force and will con-
tinue to be viewed. Personnel have attended FOIA
Workshops sponsored by the U.S. Civil Service Commission.

DCA provides a 45-minute briefing to all newly assigned
personnel on the FOI and the Privacy Act.

A DCAA Executive Conference, held semiannually, provides
training on FOIA to the Agency's executive staff. Each
of the six regions hold periodic regional conferences,
which provide FOIA training to Field Audit Office
managers. In addition, the Regional FOIA Monitors

hold on-site visits to train members of the Field

Audit Office staff.

Continued increase in participation by Command Elements
in stressing importance of FOIA. Compliance with the
Act is an item on the agenda of The Inspector General.

All incoming agents undergoing training have received
formal instruction on the Act. Headquarters Staff per-
sonnel have received detailed on-the-job training and
have attended Civil Service Commission courses in this
area. Due to the mission and centralized organization
of the DIS, extensive formal training has not been
necessary. Such training will be conducted when the
Department of Defense training package is disseminated.

28



DoD

osD/Jcs

DEPT NAVY

Item 11

FOIA Instructional and Educational Efforts

In 1977, Congress, through its Appropriations Committees,
deleted all funds for, and prohibited completion of, a
DoD unique program of Freedom of Information Act and
Privacy Act education and instruction. While this major,
single Defense-wide training program was being developed
by the Interservice Training Review Organization, DoD
placed a moratorium on all other FOIA/Privacy Act train-
ing development within the Department to achieve maximum
cost effectiveness. The Appropriations Committees’
decision not only terminated abruptly this DoD educational
development program, but also left the Department without
a Defense-wide education/training program of any major
consequence. Long-term compliance with the spirit of

the Freedom of Information Act depends on preserving a
positive attitude regarding the public's legitimate
access to DoD's records. The cornerstone of the process
which instills this positive attitude is a pervasive

and effective training program. The Congressional pro-
hibition of this Defense-wide training/education effort
is a major setback to the Department's Freedom of
Information Program, and remains the major DoD concem
in the management of its Departmental programs implement-
ing the FOIA.

During the first half of CY 1977, instruction to employ-
ees in the implementation of the FOIA Program within the
Office of the Secretary of Defense and Organization of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff continued to be augmented
through conferences for program officials; notifications
concerning Civil Service Commission FOIA courses; and

a standard procedure to brief newly appointed program
officials and other employees upon request. FOIA Program
personnel continued to attend private sector FOIA con-
ferences, symposia and seminars.

The Department of the Navy (OP-O09B1P) is in the process
of establishing a board consisting of representatives
from the various Naval Headquarters activities within
the Washington area. The board will be known as "The
FOIA/PA Policy Board," and will meet once a month to
discuss: (1) problem areas encountered by the various
activities, (2) more ideas on the administration of

the Acts, (3) a training program within this Department,

27



Item 2(b)

Statutes Invoked on Initial Determinations

DoD
. Statute Number of Times by Agency Total
E
g 8 Z%
-_>e Be 4 <
am a A < an s tt Bm
SR BB SREB SRAR B
10 U.S.C. 2202 = l-- - ee oe te 1
18 U.S.C. 504 - - l- ee er err FT 1
18 U.S.C. 798 te - - - = = = = = = 108 = 109
18 U.S.C. 1905 -41 -50 -3---7 7-07 7 94
50 U.S.C. 403 7 -- - = = = = 5 = 7 1 - 128
Public Law 86-36 Pee ee ee eee He 143
Atomic Energy Act 464-5. - - ee ee te 8
of 1954
Agency Totals 1346 150 - 3 - - - - - 371 - 484

3 (Revised March 28, 1978)



5400.7 (Encl 2)

Feb 14, 75 —.
SEARCH
Clerical search, per hour. ............ $5.50
*Minimum charge. . . woe . esas 2.75
Professional search (includes computer programmer
time and review to determine whether a record
comes within the scope of a request) per hour .. . 11,00
*Minimum charge. . 2. 6 6 ee eee et tt 5.50

Computer Service Charges

Computer service charges will be based on actual computer con-
figuration used and be based on direct costs only of the Central
Processing Unit, plus Input/Output Devices, plus Memory
Capacity. Transportation costs of records and personnel arising
from searches for requesting reports will be charged at actual
cost.

Audiovisual Documentary Material

Service charges for audiovisual documentary materials will include
clerical and professional search fees as listed above as well as the
direct costs of reproducing the photography or tape and shipping or
mailing charges. Audiovisual materials provided a requester under
provisions of this Directive need not be in reproducible format or
quality.

Waiver of Fees

1. In general, charges shall be waived or reduced when it
is determined that release of a requested record primarily benefits
the general public and, therefore, is in the public interest.
Examples of common situations in which such a deterrrination may
be made include:

a. The recipient of the benefits is engaged in a nonprofit
activity designed for public safety, health or welfare;

b. Payment of the full costs or fee by a state, local
government or nonprofit group would not be in the interest of the
program; —

* Under Revision

18



Item 10 C

Time Limit Extensions by Agency

I II & IIL
Reporting Unusual Circumstances Court
2 Activity Location Volume Consultation Involvement Total
OsD/Jcs 7 6 12 0 25
DEPT ARMY 0 (0) 1 i) 1
DEPT NAVY 28 13 6 0 47
DEPT AF 29 22 194 0 245
DCA i) 0 i) 0 0
DCAA 16 22 25 0 33%
DIA 0 0 0 ) 0
DIS 0 0 0 0 0
DLA 0 i) 2 0 2
DMA 0 0 0 0 0
DNA 0 0 0 0 0
NSA 0 6 3 O 9
DCPA 0 ) 0 0 0
DoD Totals 80 69 243 0 362*

* Total does not balance because DCAA reported instancesin which all three
circumstances necessitated extension of time.

24



Department of Defense
FOI Appeal and Program Officials

Director

Agency Appellate Program
Abbreviation Authority Official
OSD/JCS Thomas B. Ross Charles W. Hinkle
Ass't SecDef Public Director, FOI and Security
Affairs Review, OASD/PA
Dept Army General Counsel Guy Oldaker
Secretary of the Army Chief, Records Mgmt Division
Office of The Adjutant General
Dept Navy Judge Advocate General/ Donald Carr
General Counsel for PA/FOIA Coordinator
Secretary of the Navy Naval Records Mgmt Division
OPNAV
Dept AF Thomas W. Nelson Charles C. Ratcliffe
Admin Ass't to the OPR for Freedom of Information
Secretary of the Documentation Systems Division
Air Force
DCA Lt Gen Lee M. Paschall, John T. Whealen
Jr. USAF, Director General Counsel
DCAA Harry W. Kettles Ms. Lee Taylor
Ass't Director of Records Administrator
Resources
DIA John Brock R. Herbert Holzbauer
DIA Counsel Reference Library Branch
Central Reference Division
Deputy Director for Support
DIS Bernard J. O'Donnell LTC Dale L. Hartig
virector Ass't for Information
DLA LTGEN W. W. Vaughan, Colonel J. McAleer, Jr. .
USA, Director Staff Director, Administration
DMA RADM R. M. Collins, B. C. Wimberly
USN , Deputy Director General Counsel
DNA VADM Robert R. Monroe, LTCOL William J. McGee, USA
USN, Director Public Affairs Officer
NSA Wm. H. Jenkins William P. Sullivan
Appellate, FOI/Privacy Acting Chief, Policy Staff Office
DCPA Bardyl R. Tirana Walter A. Girstantas

Ass't Dir for Admin Services



Item 5(c)

Other Reasons Cited on Appeal Determinations

Reporting
Activity Category* Total
oo 1 2 3 4 5

osD/JCs 0 1 (0) 1) 0 1
DEPT ARMY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DEPT NAVY 17 4 1 9 0 31
DEPT AF i) 0 0 2 0 2
DCA 0 0 0 0 (0) 0
DCAA 0 0 0 0 0 0
DIA i) 0 to) 0 0 0
DIS 0 0 0 0 0 0
DLA 0 3 te) 0 2 5
DMA 0 0 0 0 0 0
DNA 0 0 oO 0) 0 0
NSA 0 0 0 i} 0 0
DCPA 0 0 0 0 0 0
DoD Totals 17 8 1 11 2 39

* 1. Transferred Appeal.
“. 2. Lack of Records.
~ 3. Failure of Requester to Reasonably Describe Record.
4. Other Failures by Requesters to Comply with Published Rules
and/or Directives.

11



Item 6
(Cont'd)

No. of Instances

Name Title of Participation

Exemptions Other

DEPT AF

Thomas W. Nelson

Administrative Assistant

Secretary of The Air Force 10
Eldon L. McColl Deputy Administrative
Assistant, Secretary of
The Air Force 140 2
DCA
James M. Rockwell, MajGen Vice Director, DCA 1
DCAA
Harry W. Kettles Assistant Director, Resources 10
DIA
B. R. Inman, VADM, USN Director (Acting) 3
J. Hughes Vice Director
Operations & Supply (Acting) 1
DIS
Bernard J. O'Donnell Director 2
DLA
W. W. Vaughan, LtGen, USA Director, DLA 4 1
Philip Crosby, RADM, USN Deputy Director, DLA 6 4
DMA
W. T. Riordan Deputy Director
Programs, Production
and Operations 1
NSA
William H. Jenkins FOI Appeal Authority 32
DCPA No Appeals _
DoD Total 472 39

13



Department of Defense

Reporting Agencies under the Freedom of Information Act

Agency
Abbreviation
osb/Jcs

Dept Army
Dept Navy
Dept AF

DCA

DCAA

DIA

DIS

DLA

DMA

DNA

NSA

« DCPA

(as of December 31, 1977)

Agency

Office of the Secretary
of Defense

Secretary of the Army
Secretary of the Navy
Secretary of the Air Force

Defense Communications
Agency

Defense Contract Audit
Agency

Defense Intelligence
Agency

Defense Investigative
Service

Defense Logistics Agency

Defense Mapping Agency

Defense Nuclear Agency

National Security Agency
Central Security Service

Defense Civil Preparedness
Agency

Agency Head

Harold Brown

Clifford L, Alexander
W. Graham Claytor, Jr.
John C. St- tson

Lt Gen Lee M. Paschall, Jr.
USAF

Frederick Newman

Lt Gen Eugene F. Tighe, Jr.
USAF, Director

Bernard J. O'Donnell

LTGEN W. W. Vaughan, USA

Lt Gen Abner B. Martin,
USAF

VADM R. R. Monroe, USN

VADM Bobby Inman, USN

Bardyl R. Tirana



(a4

-AqueZe yore uf werZoid Tog ay 03 ATeATSsnToOKe paqoasp atdoed jo zequnu

ugew 0} panizsuod aq jou pTNoys soft IsTIeIs IeaXueM syy “ysenbe1 ted stseq ATAInoy ue uo Jo (skep OZT yore)

sinoy eTqeTTear jo a8ejueoied e se queds emf} 242 Buzpiover jo uofzado ayQ ueaT3 are Butsssv0ad ysanbez uy
PeATOAUT STeNpFATpul ‘*s3senbe1 sfTqnd Bufzsseo0id yITM peeToosse squnowe pezeWyIse [TeI0Ues Jo@eTJeI sjSs00 eseyl

[oo-tez't $0°S69 TL°7S9 00°0¢8"6S 69° OLT'6E 76°€80'78 foz:9s6"t . = ‘DFtand woxy perseTTOo aunomy -g
— — — ——e
0S ‘69T €99°OL 6z0'T 82E‘8E9'T $46°T99 020 ‘s¥s‘T BYE 69S AI-I 30 83809 [w20L “¥
o0z 675'T - ese‘zy €6€ ‘07 7z0°8S 8191?
- . ‘ ‘ ‘ “ (7939 ‘29 ¢ndmoo
oot B0S‘ZT L99'T 9SL‘€z 826 “6T ‘qoneza ‘yeasod ew yone seoay jo Separod
-82 Azequntoa) #3800 Buzzezedo 10420 “a
4 90€ - 996°C 68L‘E ese'9 ose (Z) 9 (1) 30 26z) Peoyse40 (£)
Of - - sty Szz's 999°T ose yroors aa @
‘ - sot 7066 69L'Sz oss euOT
L 0s €2z‘T 6S9°€z a g-vin |
—_ — — —
Ost'z Toz €2z 879% oy 6IS‘T? ses‘9s 99Te 380) 29430 FO TeIOL “a
00'T - - 619‘0T tee 6z6°2 £65 sprosey pesuyrg JO 380) “a
- - Lot 9nS°T yIZ'z 8oL T bai heres et cept 0
ose ott 16 OL‘ 9% ssotze 0v0'sy Ots‘T :
- 16 sz ooc'é 8L6'Y 8Te‘c 290°T 83809 MEL YDreeg zeINdECD “y
_ 8260) peretey eee) 30N20 “TIT
—
PST LUT £t*g9_ | 90g Ie Tys tt ££0009 BES‘ oZy'T 90S ‘97S 83809 18430 JO TWIOL “A .
Ter 67 Tea’ OT £1280 120021 806“ vez To6"70t (257) 932 peoyzeag *E
SZL°LIL L86°?S 229. RROSEEZ ST 200 ‘084 O£9 “6ET‘T £09 ‘612 O11 pur air 30 Te20L “d
Tes ‘yz cists 999 Z9E ‘987 00s ‘89T 870‘ L2T 9LLiLE [e203 3802 anoqueR (9)
iiaaras z19*Z - geetle 618°2Z SIT‘OT 8T6‘T seTatataoe a9y39 (5)
zt 900'T 99 89662 666°6T BLL'6 66T‘T sdead azo 9 *80210) ()
9z9't zeEte - L116 8e9°87 Try se 165°9 noadde 9 woTIwUTPI0CD (£) :
ssetz 2L5°9 6 16S ‘89 £50‘ 9€ 96°22 400‘9T Suzezoxe 9 mataee (Z) ;
LL9°L 298'T 98 ofnes 260% 99°84 $so‘zt ours yorwes (T) :
7 (89282 eTnpeyos 993) Az08e3"> <q
sanoyuee peaeeyase 30 3809 ‘9
Z9T'E6 €08 ‘Se 992'9%6 90s ‘tte zes*Zt0'T 78‘ T8€ (peaepzeucs eepex8) s2vetore goasop *@
: . . : . . e200; perwsyiez “Vv
9s°% IVT 88°26 zs°st 20°29 90°ST sea009 zy
- =
‘ 26's (203983 3809 x eaeenbe2 30 *on) :
986'6 i pessesorg sisonbey euyanon —'T
via woa : vou av AVN IV sor7/aso ‘anrino 3800

SBILIAILOV ONILYOdTa



OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20301

March 1, 1978

This Summary Report has been issued as an overview of
Department of Defense performance in the Freedom of
Information Program in Calendar Year 1977 required by
Subsection 3(d), Section 552 of Title 5, United States
Code. The enclosed pages were included with the
thirteen separate Defense Agency reports transmitted
to Congress as the "Report to the Congress, Freedom of
Information, CY 1977."

Data on each item required by Congress are presented
in chart and statistical form reflecting overall agency
and DoD totals. 7

Charles W. Hinkle
Director, Freedom of Information
and Security Review



Item 10 D

Internal Memoranda
- (Including Directives not Published in Federal Register)

Reporting
ate Activity No. of Memoranda No. Available to Public
DoD 2 2
osp/JCs 6 6
DEPT ARMY 0 vv)
DEPT NAVY 3 3
DEPT AF 0 0
DCA 0 0
DCAA 5 5
DIA 2 2
DIS 0 1)
DLA 0 i)
DMA 0 0
DNA 0 0
NSA 1) 0
DCPA O° 0°
DoD Total 18 — 18

25



Item 5(a)

Exemptions Invoked on Appeal Determinations

Exemptions by Number (552(a

Reporting

Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total
osp/JCs 12 0 2 2 6 1 Vy) 0 1) 23
DEPT ARMY 22 2 ) 5 39 33 58 0 0 159
DEPT NAVY 6 4 1 12 22 26 18 Oo 0 89
DEPT AF 9 4 11 44 95 43 29 0 i) 235
DCA 0 t) 0 1 1 0 i) i) 0 2
DCAA (0) 0 1 1 8 0 2 0 0 12
DIA 4 i) 1 0 i) 0 0 0 0 5
DIS t) 1) 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 3
DLA 0) 0 1) 6 1 2 0 t) 0 9
DMA 1 0 i} t) 0 0 0 0 i) 1
DNA ) 1) 1) 0 0 1) 0 0 1) 0
NSA 30 0 30 0 1) 1) 2 0 0 62
DCPA 0 0 0 0 1) ) t) 0 0 0
DoD Totals 84 10 46 71 #173 «106 = 110 0 0 600
Percent of 14.00 1.70 7.67 11.8 28.83 17.67 18.33 0 0 100%
Total



Item 6

Participation of Appellate Authorities

(those responsible for denials in whole or in

part)

No. of Instances
Name Title of Participation
Exemptions Other
osb/JCs
Thomas B. Ross Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Public Affairs) 10 1
Alan Woods Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Public Affairs) 1
Thomas F. Lambert Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Public Affairs) 1
Guy E. Hairston, MajGen, USAF Deputy Assistant Secretary
of Defense (Public Affairs) 2
DEPT ARMY
Secretary of the Army 159
DEPT NAVY
E. Grey, Lewis General Counsel 2
Togo D. West, Jr. General Counsel 6
William L. Brown Deputy General Counsel 2
Harvey Wilcox Deputy General Counsel 1
C. B. McDowell Judge Advocate General 33 7
W. 0. Miller, RADM, USN Judge Advocate General 37 8
J.-S. Jenkins, CAPT, USN Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Civil Law) 5 4
W. D. Pfeiffer, CAPT, USN Deputy Assistant Judge
Advocate General 3 12

12