alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George Mark, *Respondent v.*The Guardian Fire Insurance Company of New York, *Appellant*.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Osborn, J.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.


I, Nehemia Kaufman, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of B.O.S. Better Online
Solutions Ltd (the "registrant");


2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;


(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];


(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and


(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):


(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and


(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: June 17, 2004


/s/ Nehemia Kaufman
-------------------
Nehemia Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer
AFS-15-1393-E

June 25, 2015

 Exemption No. 10844A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9782

Mr. Peter M. McNeil

Clarke Mosquito Control

159 North Garden Avenue

Roselle, IL 60172

Dear Mr. McNeil:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10844. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 28, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Clarke Mosquito Control (CMC) for an extension to Exemption No. 10844. That 

exemption from § 91.313(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows CMC to carry 

passengers in certain aircraft, certificated in the restricted category, while performing aerialsite survey flights. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to CMC.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10844 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 
2

Therefore, under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. § 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the 

FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Clarke Mosquito Control an 

exemption from 14 CFR § 91.313(d) to the extent necessary to allow CMC to operate its Bell 

206 B3 (N324CM), subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Aircraft operated under the authority of this exemption must be dual-certificated in the 

restricted and standard airworthiness categories.

2. Aircraft operating under the authority of this exemption must be operated with the 

spray tanks empty.

3. The following passengers may be carried on board aircraft operating under the 

authority of this exemption: personnel of CMC, consultants to CMC, potential 

mosquito control customers, and county and municipal officials.

4. Passengers carried on aircraft operating under the authority of this exemption must be 

notified before the flight that the operation is being conducted under this exemption 

from the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations that prohibit the carriage of 

passengers in aircraft certificated in the restricted category.

5. When notified in writing, CMC must comply with any appended conditions and 

limitations set forth by the manager of the Flight Standards Division of the FAA Great 

Lakes regional office.

6. This exemption is not valid for operations outside of the United States.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10844 to June 30, 2017, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
#### § 81.76 Depositions.

Upon such terms as may be just, for the convenience of the parties or of the Department, the presiding officer may authorize or direct the testimony of any witness to be taken by deposition.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arunas A. Chesonis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of PAETEC Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-l5(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants hoard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007



/s/ Arunas A. ChesonisArunas A. ChesonisChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL )

COMMITTEE, INC., ) Case No. 1:16-CV-0121-BAH

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________ )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CERTIFY FACTS AND QUESTIONS

Pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30110, Plaintiff Libertarian National Committee, Inc. (“LNC”)

respectfully moves this Court to adopt the proposed findings of fact and certify the following

questions to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit:

1. Does imposing annual contribution limits against the bequest of Joseph Shaber

violate the First Amendment rights of the Libertarian National Committee?

2. Do 52 U.S.C. §§ 30116(a)(1)(B) and 30125, on their face, violate the First

Amendment rights of the Libertarian National Committee by restricting the purposes

for which the Committee may spend its money?

3. Does restricting the purposes for which the Libertarian National Committee may

spend the bequest of Joseph Shaber violate the Committee’s First Amendment rights?

This motion is based upon the attached memorandum of points and authorities in support of

the motion, attached declarations and exhibits, the Court’s file, matters of which the Court may take

judicial notice, and any argument the Court may wish to schedule.

Case 1:16-cv-00121-BAH Document 24 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff reserves the right to submit additional proposed facts as may be warranted in

response to any response to this motion, including proposed facts, by the Defendant.

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the motion be granted.

Dated: September 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

Alan Gura (D.C. Bar No. 453449)

Gura PLLC

916 Prince Street, Suite 107

Alexandria, VA 22314

703.835.9085/Fax 703.997.7665

By: /s/ Alan Gura

Alan Gura

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:16-cv-00121-BAH Document 24 Filed 09/05/17 Page 2 of 2
§ 612.9 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals of denials.* You may appeal a denial of your request to the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You must make your appeal in writing and it must be received by the Office of the General Counsel within ten days of the receipt of the denial (weekends, legal holidays, and the date of receipt excluded). You must clearly mark your appeal letter and the envelope or your electronic submission as a “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.” Your appeal letter must include a copy of your written request and the denial together with any written argument you wish to submit.
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* A written decision on your appeal will be made by the General Counsel. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole or in part will contain a statement of the reason(s) for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied, and will inform you of the FOIA provisions for court review of the decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal, in whole or in part, you will be notified in a written decision and your request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal decision.
( c ) *When appeal is required.* If you wish to seek review by a court of any denial, you must first appeal it under this section.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 1 9

- 0 289

STATE OF MONTANA,
Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.
JAMES MICHAEL WEBB, JR.
, Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and
good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension
of time to and including Ju ly 20 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file,
and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 12 2020

06/12/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0289
§ 95.519 Cost disallowance. If costs under a Public Assistance program are not claimed in accordance with the approved cost allocation plan (except as otherwise provided in § 95.517), or if the State failed to submit an amended cost allocation plan as required by § 95.509, the costs improperly claimed will be disallowed. ( a ) ( 1 ) If the issue affects the program(s) of only one Operating Division and does not affect the programs of other Operating Divisions or Federal departments, that Operating Division will determine the amount of the disallowance and will also inform the State of its opportunity for reconsideration of the determination in accordance with the Operating Division's procedures. Prior to issuing the notification, however, the Operating Division shall consult with the DCA to ensure that the issue does not affect the programs of other Operating Divisions or Federal departments.
( 2 ) If the State wishes to request a reconsideration of the Operating Division's determination, it must submit the request in accordance with the Operating Division's procedures.
( b ) If the issue affects the programs of more than one Operating Division, or Federal department or the State, the Director, DCA, after consulting with the Operating Divisions, shall determine the amount inappropriately claimed under each program. The Director, DCA will notify the State of this determination, of the dollar affect of the determination on the claims made under each program, and will inform the State of its opportunity for appeal of the determination under 45 CFR part 16. The State will subsequently be notified by the appropriate Operating Division as to the disposition of the funds in question.
[47 FR 17509, Apr. 23, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 38218, July 17, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10229-10230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Research on Women's Health.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee on Research on Women's 
Health.
    Date: March 29-30, 2007.
    Time: March 29, 2007, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: Provide advice to the Office of Research on Women's 
Health (ORWH) on appropriate research activities with respect to 
women's health and related studies to be undertaken by the National 
Research Institutes; to provide recommendations regarding ORWH 
activities; to meet the mandates of the office; and for discussion 
of scientific issues.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, 6C/10, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Time: March 30, 2007, 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: Same as above.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, 6C/10, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Joyce Rudick, Director, Programs & Management, 
Office of Research on Women's Health, Office of the Director, 
National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Room 201, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301/402-1770.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www4.od.nih.gov/orwh/, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research

[[Page 10230]]

Generally; 93.39, Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH 
Acquired Immunodeficiancy Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 
93.187, Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from 
Disadvantaged Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1041 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### §§ 75.382-75.385 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, April 13, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1365 Filed 3-15-07; 4:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13514-13515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-07-004]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: March 26, 2007 at 1 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1110 (Preliminary)(Sodium Hexametaphosphate from 
China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on March 26, 
2007; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted 
to the Secretary of Commerce on or before April 2, 2007.).
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: March 19, 2007.


[[Page 13515]]


    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1444 Filed 3-20-07; 2:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### In the Matter of the Mercantile Trust Company.

Motion denied.
§ 110.30-7 Repairs or alterations. The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection must be notified before— ( a ) Alterations or modifications that deviate from approved plans; or
( b ) Repairs, alterations, or modifications that affect the safety of the vessel.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28275, June 4, 1996]
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-23-00367-CV 

 

DWIGHT H. MILES, SR., APPELLANT 

V. 

BIG FROG CUSTOM T-SHIRTS, INC., APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 395th District Court 

Williamson County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 23-0126-C395, Honorable Ryan D. Larson, Presiding 

December 20, 2023 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Dwight H. Miles, Sr., proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s 

judgment.1 The appellate record was originally due November 13, 2023. The clerk’s 

record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record was not. By letter of November 

27, 2023, we notified the reporter that the record was overdue and directed her to advise 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

this Court of the status of the record by December 7. The reporter has not filed the record 

or had any further communication with this Court to date.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring 

appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to 

preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, 

the trial court shall determine the following:

(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;

(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those 

tasks; and

(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court

finds reasonable.

Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days 

to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter 

to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January 

19, 2023.

Should the reporter file the record on or before January 3, 2023, she is directed to 

immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not 

be required to take any further action.
3

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
#### § 2540.207 Waiver.

CNCS may waive provisions of §§ 2540.200 through.2540.206 for good cause, or for any other lawful basis. To request a waiver, submit a written request to NSCHC Waiver Requests, 250 E Street SW, Washington DC 20525, or send your request to *NSCHCWaiverRequest@cns.gov.*

[86 FR 11148, Feb. 24, 2021]
§ 10.237 Right of appeal. ( a ) If the Coast Guard refuses to grant an applicant an MMC, medical certificate, or endorsement it will provide, a written statement listing the reason(s) for denial.
( b ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this subchapter, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal under the provisions of subpart 1.03 of part 1 of this chapter.
( c ) The Coast Guard will not review decisions made by the Transportation Security Administration to suspend, revoke, or deny a mariner's TWIC.
[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11216, Mar. 16, 2009, as amended by USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77894, Dec. 24, 2013]