13872 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Transit Administration 

FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments 

and Allocations and Program 

Information 

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration 

(FTA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The ‘‘Revised Continuing 

Appropriations Resolution, 2007,’’ 

(Public Law 110–5), signed into law by 

President Bush on February 15, 2007, 

makes funds available for all of the 

surface transportation programs of the 

Department of Transportation (DOT) for 

the Fiscal Year (FY) ending September 

30, 2007. This notice provides 

information on the FY 2007 funding 

available for the Federal Transit 

Administration (FTA) assistance 

programs, and provides program 

guidance and requirements, and 

information on several program issues 

important in the current year. The 

notice also includes tables that show 

unobligated carryover funding available 

in FY 2007 under certain discretionary 

programs from prior years. Finally, this 

notice also references separate Notices 

of Funding Availability (NOFA) 

published concurrently for discretionary 

opportunities under the Bus and Bus 

Facilities Program and the Alternatives 

Analysis Program. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

general information about this notice 

contact Mary Martha Churchman, 

Director, Office of Transit Programs, at 

(202) 366–2053. Please contact the 

appropriate FTA regional office for any 

specific requests for information or 

technical assistance. The Appendix at 

the end of this notice includes contact 

information for FTA regional offices. An 

FTA headquarters contact for each 

major program area is also included in 

the discussion of that program in the 

text of the notice. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Overview 

II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs 

A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing 

Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and 

SAFETEA–LU Authorization 

B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project 

Management Oversight 

III. FY 2007 FTA Key Program Initiatives and 

Changes 

A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation 

B. Planning Emphasis Areas 

C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant 

Opportunities 

D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures 

E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike 

Policy 

IV. FTA Programs 

A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 

U.S.C. 5303) 

B. Statewide Planning and Research 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5304) 

C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 

U.S.C. 5307) 

D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 

5308) 

E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 

5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization 

F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 

5309)—Bus and Bus-Related Facilities 

G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 

5309)—New Starts 

H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals 

and Individuals with Disabilities 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5310) 

I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 

U.S.C. 5311) 

J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program 

(49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3)) 

K. Public Transportation on Indian 

Reservation Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c)) 

L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C. 

5314) 

M. Job Access and Reverse Commute 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5316) 

N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317) 

O. Alternative Transportation in Parks and 

Public Lands (49 U.S.C. 5320) 

P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 

U.S.C. 5339) 

Q. Growing States and High Density States 

Formula (49 U.S.C. 5340) 

R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note) 

V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2007 

Grants Requirements 

A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to 

Incur Project Costs 

B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy 

C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of 

Certifications and Assurances 

D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes 

E. Grant Application Procedures 

F. Payments 

G. Oversight 

H. Technical Assistance 

Tables 

1. FTA FY 2007 Appropriations and 

Apportionments for Grant Programs 

2. FTA FY 2007 Metropolitan 

Transportation Planning Program and 

Statewide Transportation Planning 

Program Apportionments 

3. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 and Section 

5340 Urbanized Area Apportionments 

4. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 

Apportionment Formula 

5. FTA FY 2007 Formula Programs 

Apportionments Data Unit Values 

6. FTA FY 2007 Small Transit Intensive 

Cities Performance Data and 

Apportionments 

7. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or 

More in Population Eligible to Use 

Section 5307 Funds for Operating 

Assistance 

8. FTA FY 2007 Section 5308 Clean Fuels 

Grant Program Allocations 

9. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 

5308 Clean Fuels Allocations 

10. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Fixed 

Guideway Modernization 

Apportionments 

11. FTA FY 2007 Fixed Guideway 

Modernization Program Apportionment 

Formula 

12. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Bus and 

Bus-Related Allocations 

13. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 

5309 Bus and Bus-Related Facilities 

Allocations 

14. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 New Starts 

Allocations 

15. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 

5309 New Starts Allocations 

16. FTA FY 2007 Special Needs for Elderly 

Individuals and Individuals With 

Disabilities Apportionments 

17. FTA FY 2007 Section 5311 and Section 

5340 Nonurbanized Area Formula 

Apportionments, and Rural 

Transportation Assistance Program 

(RTAP) Allocations 

18. FTA FY 2007 National Research 

Program Allocations 

19. FTA FY 2007 Section 5316 Job Access 

and Reverse Commute (JARC) 

Apportionments 

20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Jarc 

Allocations 

21. FTA FY 2007 Section 5317 New 

Freedom Apportionments 

22. FTA FY 2007 Section 5339 Alternative 

Analysis Allocations 

23. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 

5339 Alternative Analysis Alliocations 

Appendix 

I. Overview 

This document apportions or allocates 

the FY 2007 funds available under the 

Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 

2007, among potential program 

recipients according to statutory 

formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or 

congressional designations in Safe, 

Accountable, Flexible, Efficient 

Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for 

Users (SAFETEA–LU). 

For each FTA program included, we 

have provided relevant information on 

the FY 2007 funding currently available, 

requirements, period of availability, and 

other related program information and 

highlights, as appropriate. A separate 

section of the document provides 

information on requirements and 

guidance that are applicable to all FTA 

programs. 

II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs 

A. Funding Based on FY 2007 

Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 

2007, and SAFETEA–LU Authorization 

The Revised Continuing 

Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (Pub. 

L. 110–5, February 15, 2007); hereafter 

called the Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides general 

funds and obligation authority for trust 

funds that total $8.97 billion for FTA 

programs, through September 30, 2007. 

Table 1 of this document shows the 

funding for the FTA programs, as 

provided for in the Continuing 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13873 

Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and 

the reallocation of any prior year funds 

to the program. All the Formula 

Programs and the Section 5309 Bus and 

Bus Facilities Program are entirely 

funded from the Mass Transit Account 

of the Highway Trust Fund in FY 2007. 

The Section 5309 New Starts program, 

the Research program, and FTA 

administrative expenses are funded by 

appropriations from the General Fund of 

the Treasury. 

Congress has enacted a full year 

Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 

2007, in lieu of a new Appropriations 

Act for FY 2007. This Notice includes 

tables of apportionments and allocations 

for FTA programs. Allocations based on 

SAFETEA–LU are included for some 

discretionary programs. In addition, 

FTA will issue separate Notices of 

Funding Availability to solicit 

applications for discretionary funds not 

allocated in SAFETEA–LU. 

B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project 

Management Oversight 

FTA uses a percentage of funds 

appropriated to certain FTA programs 

for program oversight activities 

conducted by the agency. The funds are 

used to provide necessary oversight 

activities, including oversight of the 

construction of any major project under 

these statutory programs; to conduct 

safety and security, civil rights, 

procurement, management and financial 

reviews and audits; and to provide 

technical assistance to correct 

deficiencies identified in compliance 

reviews and audits. 

Section 5327 of title 49, U.S.C., 5327 

authorizes the takedown of funds from 

FTA programs for project management 

oversight. Section 5327 provides 

oversight takedowns at the following 

levels: 0.5 percent of Planning funds, 

0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula 

funds, 1 percent of Capital Investment 

funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of 

Elderly Individuals and Individuals 

with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5 

percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula 

funds, and 0.5 percent of Alternative 

Transportation in the Parks and Public 

Lands funds. 

III. FY 2007 FTA Program Initiatives 

and Changes 

A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation. 

In FY 2007, FTA continues to focus 

on implementation of SAFETEA–LU 

through issuance of new and revised 

program guidance and regulations. As 

any documents that include binding 

obligations on grantees are issued, FTA 

makes them available for public 

comment prior to finalizing. We 

encourage grantees to regularly check 

the FTA Web site at http://www.fta.gov 

and the DOT docket management Web 

site at http://dms.dot.gov for new 

issuances and to comment to the docket 

established for each document on 

relevant issues. 

B. Planning Emphasis Areas 

FTA and the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) are not issuing 

new planning emphasis areas for FY 

2007, and are rescinding planning 

emphasis areas from prior years, in 

recognition of the priority that planning 

organizations and grantees must pay to 

implementing the new and changed 

provisions of SAFETEA–LU. 

C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant 

Opportunities 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, did not include any 

new earmarks under any FTA program. 

However, SAFETEA–LU contained 

statutory earmarks under several 

programs, and they are listed in the 

tables in this Notice. FTA will honor 

those statutory earmarks. This Notice 

also includes tables of unobligated 

balances for earmarks from prior years 

under the Bus and Bus Facilities 

Program, the New Starts Program, the 

Clean Fuels Program, and the 

Alternatives Analysis Program. FTA 

will continue to honor those earmarks. 

Because there are no new 

appropriations earmarks in FY 2007, 

there are unallocated balances available 

in several programs to be administered 

at FTA’s discretion. FTA has allocated 

most of the discretionary New Starts 

funds to the projects listed in the 

President’s Budget for FY 2007. FTA is 

soliciting applications for the 

unallocated balance of the Bus and Bus 

Facilities program through two Notices 

of Funding Availability, one published 

in a separate Part of today’s Federal 

Register to address priorities identified 

by FTA, and the other, published in 

another Part of today’s Federal Register, 

to support the Department’s Congestion 

Initiative. FTA is also issuing a Notice 

of Funding Availability to solicit 

applications for the Alternatives 

Analysis program to advance the state of 

the art of planning for New Starts 

projects, included in yet another Part of 

today’s Federal Register. 

D. Changes in Flexible Funding 

Procedures 

FHWA has changed the accounting 

procedures for flexible funds, high 

priority projects and transportation 

improvement projects transfers to FTA. 

As a result, FTA will no longer be able 

to combine these transferred funds in a 

single grant with FTA funds in the 

program to which they are transferred. 

FTA is establishing new codes and 

procedures for grants involving funds 

transferred from FHWA. See Section V 

D of this Notice for more information. 

E. National Transit Database (NTD) 

Strike Policy 

It has been FTA’s policy not to make 

adjustments to the annual funding 

apportionment of transit agencies for 

strikes, labor disputes or work 

stoppages. FTA has changed this policy. 

Effective with NTD Report Year (RY) 

2005 data, FTA will make ‘‘hold 

harmless’’ adjustments due to strikes, 

labor disputes, or work stoppages. An 

adjustment will be made beginning with 

the FY 2008 apportionment. 

NTD RY 2005 data are the actual data 

used in apportionment of FY 2007 

funds. NTD RY 2006 data will be used 

in the FY 2008 apportionment. If your 

agency had a valid strike, labor dispute 

or work stoppage during RY 2005 or RY 

2006, please contact the NTD Web site. 

Instructions for requesting a ‘‘hold 

harmless’’ adjustment can be found in 

the 2006 NTD Reporting Manual, http:// 

www.ntdprogram.gov, under 

publications; see Introduction, page 7. 

IV. FTA Programs 

This section of the notice provides 

available FY 2007 funding and other 

important program-related information 

for the three major FTA funding 

accounts included in the notice 

(Formula and Bus Grants, Capital 

Investment Grants, and Research). Of 

the 17 separate FTA programs contained 

in this notice that fall under the major 

program area headings, the funding for 

ten is apportioned by statutory or 

administrative formula. Funding for the 

other seven is allocated on a 

discretionary or competitive basis. 

Funding and other important 

information for each of the 17 programs 

is presented immediately below. This 

includes program apportionments or 

allocations, certain program 

requirements, length of time FY 2007 

funding is available to be committed, 

and other significant program 

information pertaining to FY 2007, 

including the availability of competitive 

opportunities under several programs. 

A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 

U.S.C. 5303) 

Section 5303 authorizes a cooperative, 

continuous, and comprehensive 

planning program for transportation 

investment decision-making at the 

metropolitan area level. State 

Departments of Transportation are 

direct recipients of funds, which are 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13874 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

then allocated to Metropolitan Planning 

Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for 

planning activities that support the 

economic vitality of the metropolitan 

area, especially by enabling global 

competitiveness, productivity, and 

efficiency; increasing the safety and 

security of the transportation system for 

motorized and non-motorized users; 

increasing the accessibility and mobility 

options available to people and for 

freight; protecting and enhancing the 

environment, promoting energy 

conservation, and improving quality of 

life; enhancing the integration and 

connectivity of the transportation 

system, across and between modes, for 

people and freight; promoting efficient 

system management and operation; and 

emphasizing the preservation of the 

existing transportation system. For more 

about the Metropolitan Planning 

Program, contact Candace Noonan, 

Office of Planning and Environment at 

(202) 366–1648. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $81,892,800 

to the Metropolitan Planning Program 

(49 U.S.C. 5303). The total amount 

apportioned for the Metropolitan 

Planning Program (to States for MPOs’

use in urbanized areas (UZAs) is 

$82,373,861, as shown in the table 

below, after the deduction for oversight 

(authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327) 

and addition of prior year reapportioned 

funds. 

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION

PLANNING PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $81,892,800 

Oversight Deduction ....... ¥464,464 

Prior Year Funds Added 890,525 

Total Apportioned ........ 82,373,861 

States’ apportionments for this 

program are displayed in Table 2. 

2. Basis for Formula Apportionments 

As specified in law, 82.72 percent of 

the amounts authorized for Section 5305 

are allocated to the Metropolitan 

Planning program. FTA allocates 

Metropolitan Planning funds to the 

States according to a statutory formula. 

Eighty percent of the funds are 

distributed to the States as a basic 

allocation based on each State’s UZA 

population, based on the most recent 

Census. The remaining 20 percent is 

provided to the States as a supplemental 

allocation based on an FTA 

administrative formula to address 

planning needs in the larger, more 

complex UZAs. The amount published 

for each State is a combined total of 

both the basic and supplemental 

allocation. 

3. Program Requirements 

The State allocates Metropolitan 

Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or 

portions thereof to provide funds for 

projects included in an annual work 

program (the Unified Planning Work 

Program, or UPWP) that includes both 

highway and transit planning projects. 

Each State has either reaffirmed or 

developed, in consultation with their 

MPOs, a new allocation formula, as a 

result of the 2000 Census. The State 

allocation formula may be changed 

annually, but any change requires 

approval by the FTA regional office 

before grant approval. Program guidance 

for the Metropolitan Planning Program 

is found in FTA Circular C8100.1B, 

Program Guidance and Application 

Instructions for Metropolitan Planning 

Program Grants, dated October 25, 1996. 

FTA is in the process of updating this 

circular to incorporate references to the 

new and changed planning 

requirements in sections 5303 and 5305, 

as amended by SAFETEA–LU and 

associated rulemaking. 

4. Period of Availability 

The funds apportioned under the 

Metropolitan Planning program remain 

available to be obligated by FTA to 

recipients for four fiscal years—which 

includes the year of apportionment plus 

three additional years. Any apportioned 

funds that remain unobligated at the 

close of business on September 30, 

2010, will revert to FTA for 

reapportionment under the 

Metropolitan Planning Program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs). 

FTA and FHWA are not issuing new 

PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs 

issued in prior years, in light of the 

priority given to implementation of 

SAFETEA–LU planning and program 

provisions. 

b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA 

and FHWA planning funds can be 

consolidated into a single consolidated 

planning grant (CPG), awarded by either 

FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the 

need to monitor individual fund 

sources, if several have been used, and 

ensures that the oldest funds will 

always be used first. Unlike ‘‘flex 

funds,’’ State planning funds from 

FHWA will be able to be combined with 

FTA planning funds in a single grant. 

Alternatively FTA planning funds can 

be transferred to FHWA for 

administration. 

Under the CPG, States can report 

metropolitan planning expenditures (to 

comply with the Single Audit Act) for 

both FTA and FHWA under the 

Catalogue of Federal Domestic 

Assistance number for FTA’s 

Metropolitan Planning Program 

(20.505). Additionally, for States with 

an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL) 

fund-matching ratio greater than 80 

percent, the State (through FTA) can 

request a waiver of the 20 percent local 

share requirement in order that all FTA 

funds used for metropolitan planning in 

a CPG can be granted at the higher 

FHWA rate. For some States, this 

Federal match rate can exceed 90 

percent. 

States interested in transferring 

planning funds between FTA and 

FHWA should contact the FTA regional 

office or FHWA Division Office for more 

detailed procedures. 

For further information on CPGs, 

contact Candace Noonan, Office of 

Planning and Environment, FTA, at 

(202) 366–1648, or Kenneth Petty, Office 

of Planning and Environment, FHWA, at 

(202) 366–6654. 

B. Statewide Planning and Research 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5304) 

This program provides financial 

assistance to States for Statewide 

planning and other technical assistance 

activities (including supplementing the 

technical assistance program provided 

through the Metropolitan Planning 

program), planning support for 

nonurbanized areas, research, 

development and demonstration 

projects, fellowships for training in the 

public transportation field, university 

research, and human resource 

development. For more about the 

Statewide Planning and Research 

Program contact Candace Noonan, 

Office of Planning and Environment, at 

(202) 366–1648. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $17,107,200 

to the Statewide Planning and Research 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5304). The total 

amount apportioned for the Statewide 

Planning and Research Program (SPRP) 

is $17,252,652, as shown in the table 

below, after the deduction for oversight 

(authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327) 

and addition of prior year reapportioned 

funds. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13875 

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION

PLANNING PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $17,107,200 

Oversight Deduction ....... ¥85,536 

Prior Year Funds Added 230,988 

Total Apportioned ........ 17,252,652 

State apportionments for this program 

are displayed in Table 2. 

2. Basis for Apportionment Formula 

As specified in law, 17.28 percent of 

the amounts authorized for Section 5305 

are allocated to the Statewide Planning 

and Research program. FTA apportions 

funds to States by a statutory formula 

that is based on information received 

from the latest decennial census, and 

the State’s UZA population as compared 

to the UZA population of all States. 

However, a State must receive at least 

0.5 percent of the amount apportioned 

under this program. 

3. Requirements 

Funds are provided to States for 

statewide planning and research 

programs. These funds may be used for 

a variety of purposes such as planning, 

technical studies and assistance, 

demonstrations, management training, 

and cooperative research. In addition, a 

State may authorize a portion of these 

funds to be used to supplement 

Metropolitan Planning funds allocated 

by the State to its UZAs, as the State 

deems appropriate. Program guidance 

for the Statewide Planning and Research 

program is found in FTA Circular 

C8200.1, Program Guidance and 

Application Instructions for State 

Planning and Research Program Grants, 

dated December 27, 2001. FTA is in the 

process of updating this circular to 

incorporate the new and changed 

planning requirements in sections 5304 

and 5305, as amended by SAFETEA–LU 

and associated rulemaking. 

4. Period of Availability 

The funds apportioned under the 

Statewide Planning and Research 

program remain available to be 

obligated by FTA to recipients for four 

fiscal years—which include the year of 

apportionment plus three additional 

fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that 

remain unobligated at the close of 

business on September 30, 2010, will 

revert to FTA for reapportionment 

under the Statewide Planning and 

Research Program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

The information about Planning 

Emphasis Areas and CPGs described in 

Section A. 5, above for the Metropolitan 

Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303), also 

applies to the Statewide Planning 

Program. 

C. Urbanized Area Formula Program 

(49.U.S.C. 5307) 

Section 5307 authorizes Federal 

capital and operating assistance for 

transit in Urbanized Areas (UZAs). A 

UZA is an area with a population of 

50,000 or more that has been defined 

and designated as such in the most 

recent decennial census by the U.S. 

Census Bureau. The Urbanized Area 

Formula Program may also be used to 

support planning activities, as a 

supplement to that funded under the 

Metropolitan Planning program 

described above. Urbanized Areas 

Formula Program funds used for 

planning must be shown in the UPWP 

for MPO(s) with responsibility for that 

area. Funding is apportioned directly to 

each UZA with a population of 200,000 

or more, and to the State Governors for 

UZAs with populations between 50,000 

and 200,000. Eligible applicants are 

limited to entities designated as 

recipients in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 

5307(a)(2) and other public entities with 

the consent of the Designated Recipient. 

Generally, operating assistance is not an 

eligible expense for UZAs with 

populations of 200,000 or more. 

However, there are several exceptions to 

this restriction. The exceptions are 

described in section 2(e) below. 

For more information about the 

Urbanized Area Formula Program 

contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit 

Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides 

$3,606,175,000 to the Urbanized Area 

Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). The 

total amount apportioned for the 

Urbanized Area Formula Program is 

$3,924,820,789 as shown in the table 

below, after the deduction for oversight 

(authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and 

including prior year reapportioned 

funds and funds apportioned to UZA’s 

from the appropriation for Section 5340 

for Growing States and High Density 

States. 

URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $3,606,175,000 a

URBANIZED AREA FORMULA

PROGRAM—Continued 

Oversight Deduction ....... ¥27,046,313 

Prior Year Funds Added 4,957,616 

Section 5340 Funds 

Added .......................... 340,734,486 

Total Apportioned ........ 3,924,820,789 

a Includes $36,061,750 for one percent setaside for Small Transit Intensive Cities 

Formula. 

Table 3 displays the amounts 

apportioned under the Urbanized Area 

Formula Program. 

2. Basis for Formula Apportionment 

FTA apportions Urbanized Area 

Formula Program funds based on 

legislative formulas. Different formulas 

apply to UZAs with populations of 

200,000 or more and UZAs with 

populations less than 200,000. For 

UZAs 50,000 to 199,999 in population, 

the formula is based simply on 

population and population density. For 

UZAs with populations of 200,000 and 

more, the formula is based on a 

combination of bus revenue vehicle 

miles, bus passenger miles, fixed 

guideway revenue vehicle miles, and 

fixed guideway route miles, as well as 

population and population density. 

Table 4 includes detailed information 

about the formulas. 

To calculate a UZA’s FY 2007 

apportionment, FTA used population 

and population density statistics from 

the 2000 Census and (when applicable) 

validated mileage and transit service 

data from transit providers’ 2005 

National Transit Database (NTD) Report 

Year. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 

5336(b). FTA used 60 percent of the 

directional route miles attributable to 

the Alaska Railroad passenger 

operations system to calculate the 

apportionment for the Anchorage, 

Alaska UZA. 

We have calculated dollar unit values 

for the formula factors used in the 

Urbanized Area Formula Program 

apportionment calculations. These 

values represent the amount of money 

each unit of a factor is worth in this 

year’s apportionment. The unit values 

change each year, based on all of the 

data used to calculate the 

apportionments. The dollar unit values 

for FY 2007 are displayed in Table 5. To 

replicate the basic formula component 

of a UZA’s apportionment, multiply the 

dollar unit value by the appropriate 

formula factor (i.e., the population, 

population x population density), and 

(when applicable, data from the NTD 

(i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, 

passenger miles, and operating cost). 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13876 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

In FY 2007, one percent of funds 

appropriated for Section 5307, 

$36,061,750, is set aside for Small 

Transit Intensive Cities (STIC). FTA 

apportions these funds to UZAs under 

200,000 in population that operate at a 

level of service equal to or above the 

industry average level of service for all 

UZAs with a population of at least 

200,000, but not more than 999,999, in 

one or more of six performance 

categories: passenger miles traveled per 

vehicle revenue mile, passenger miles 

traveled per vehicle revenue hour, 

vehicle revenue miles per capita, 

vehicle revenue hours per capita, 

passenger miles traveled per capita, and 

passengers per capita. 

The data for these categories for the 

purpose of FY 2007 apportionments 

comes from the NTD reports for the 

2005 reporting year. This data is used to 

determine a UZA’s eligibility under the 

STIC formula, and is also used in the 

STIC apportionment calculations. 

Because this performance data change 

with each year’s NTD reports, the UZAs 

eligible for STIC funds and the amount 

each receives may vary each year. In FY 

2007, FTA apportioned $120,608 for 

each performance factor/category for 

which the urbanized area exceeded the 

national average for UZAs with a 

population of at least 200,000 but not 

more than 999,999. 

In addition to the funds apportioned 

to UZAs, according to the Section 5307 

formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 

5336, FTA also apportions funds to 

urbanized areas under Section 5340 

Growing States and High Density States 

formula factors. In FY 2007, FTA 

apportioned $138,734,486 to 453 UZA’s 

in 50 Growing States and $202,000,000 

to 46 UZA’s in seven High Density 

States. Half of the funds appropriated 

for Section 5340 are available to 

Growing States and half to High Density 

States. FTA apportions Growing States 

funds by a formula based on State 

population forecasts for 15 years beyond 

the most recent Census. FTA distributes 

the amounts apportioned for each State 

between UZAs and nonurbanized areas 

based on the ratio of urbanized/ 

nonurbanized population within each 

State in the 2000 census. FTA 

apportions the High Density States 

funds to States with population 

densities in excess of 370 persons per 

square mile. These funds are 

apportioned only to UZAs within those 

States. FTA pro-rates each UZA’s share 

of the High Density funds based on the 

population of the UZAs in the State in 

the 2000 census. 

FTA cannot provide unit values for 

the Growing States or High Density 

formulas because the allocations to 

individual States and urbanized areas 

are based on their relative population 

data, rather than on a national per capita 

basis. 

Based on language in the SAFETEA–

LU conference report that directs FTA to 

show a single apportionment amount for 

Section 5307, STIC and Section 5340, 

FTA shows a single Section 5307 

apportionment amount for each UZA in 

Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula 

apportionments. The amount includes 

funds apportioned based on the Section 

5307 formula factors, any STIC funds, 

and any Growing States and High 

Density States funding allocated to the 

area. FTA uses separate formulas 

calculations to generate the respective 

apportionment amounts for the Section 

5307, STIC and Section 5340. For 

technical assistance purposes, the UZAs 

that received STIC funds are listed in 

Table 6. FTA will make available 

breakouts of the funding allocated to 

each UZA under these formulas, upon 

request to the regional office. 

3. Program Requirements 

Program guidance for the Urbanized 

Area Formula Program is presently 

found in FTA Circular C9030.1C, 

Urbanized Area Formula Program: Grant 

Application Instructions, dated October 

1, 1998, and supplemented by 

additional information or changes 

provided in this document. FTA is in 

the process of updating the circular to 

incorporate changes resulting from 

language in SAFETEA–LU. Several 

important program requirements are 

highlighted below. 

a. Urbanized Area Formula 

Apportionments to Governors. For small 

UZAs, those with a population of less 

than 200,000, FTA apportions funds to 

the Governor of each State for 

distribution. A single total Governor 

apportionment amount for the 

Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and 

Growing States and High Density States 

is shown in the Urbanized Area 

Formula Apportionment table 3. The 

table also shows the apportionment 

amount attributable to each small UZA 

within the State. The Governor may 

determine the sub-allocation of funds 

among the small UZAs except that 

funds attributed to a small UZA that is 

located within the planning boundaries 

of a Transportation Management Area 

(TMA) must be obligated to that small 

UZA, as discussed in subsection f 

below. 

b. Transit Enhancements. Section 

5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one percent 

of Section 5307 funds apportioned to 

UZAs with populations of 200,000 or 

more be spent on eligible transit 

enhancement activities or projects. This 

requirement is now treated as a 

certification, rather than as a set-aside as 

was the case under the Transportation 

Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA–

21). Designated recipients in UZAs with 

populations of 200,000 or more certify 

they are spending not less than one 

percent of Section 5307 funds for transit 

enhancements. In addition, Designated 

Recipients must submit an annual 

report on how they spent the money 

with the Federal fiscal year’s final 

quarterly progress report in TEAM-Web. 

The report should include the following 

elements: (a) Grantee name, (b) UZA 

name and number, (c) FTA project 

number, (d) transit enhancement 

category, (e) brief description of 

enhancement and progress towards 

project implementation, (f) activity line 

item code from the approved budget, 

and (g) amount awarded by FTA for the 

enhancement. The list of transit 

enhancement categories and activity 

line item (ALI) codes may be found in 

the table of Scope and ALI codes on 

TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at 

http://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov. 

The term ‘‘transit enhancement’’

includes projects or project elements 

that are designed to enhance public 

transportation service or use and are 

physically or functionally related to 

transit facilities. Eligible enhancements 

include the following: (1) Historic 

preservation, rehabilitation, and 

operation of historic mass transportation 

buildings, structures, and facilities 

(including historic bus and railroad 

facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) 

landscaping and other scenic 

beautification, including tables, 

benches, trash receptacles, and street 

lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian 

access and walkways; (6) bicycle access, 

including bicycle storage facilities and 

installing equipment for transporting 

bicycles on mass transportation 

vehicles; (7) transit connections to parks 

within the recipient’s transit service 

area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced 

access for persons with disabilities to 

mass transportation. 

It is the responsibility of the MPO to 

determine how the one-percent for 

transit enhancements will be allotted to 

transit projects. The one percent 

minimum requirement does not 

preclude more than one percent from 

being expended in a UZA for transit 

enhancements. However, activities that 

are only eligible as enhancements—in 

particular, operating costs for historic 

facilities—may be assisted only within 

the one-percent funding level. 

c. Transit Security Projects. Pursuant 

to section 5307(d)(1)(J), each recipient of 

Urbanized Area Formula funds must 

certify that of the amount received each 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13877 

fiscal year, it will expend at least one 

percent on ‘‘public transportation 

security projects’’ or must certify that it 

has decided the expenditure is not 

necessary. For applicants not eligible to 

receive Section 5307 funds for operating 

assistance, only capital security projects 

may be funded with the one percent. 

SAFETEA–LU, however, expanded the 

definition of eligible ‘‘capital’’ projects 

to include specific crime prevention and 

security activities, including: (1) 

Projects to refine and develop security 

and emergency response plans; (2) 

projects aimed at detecting chemical 

and biological agents in public 

transportation; (3) the conduct of 

emergency response drills with public 

transportation agencies and local first 

response agencies; and (4) security 

training for public transportation 

employees, but excluding all expenses 

related to operations, other than such 

expenses incurred in conducting 

emergency drills and training. New ALI 

codes have been established for these 

four new capital activities. The one 

percent may also include security 

expenditures included within other 

capital activities, and, where the 

recipient is eligible, operating 

assistance. The relevant ALI codes 

would be used for those activities. 

FTA is often called upon to report to 

Congress and others on how grantees are 

expending Federal funds for security 

enhancements. To facilitate tracking of 

grantees’ security expenditures, which 

are not always evident when included 

within larger capital or operating 

activity line items in the grant budget, 

we have established a non-additive 

(‘‘non-add’’) scope code for security 

expenditures—Scope 991. The non-add 

scope is to be used to aggregate 

activities included in other scopes, and 

it does not increase the budget total. 

Section 5307 grantees should include 

this non-add scope in the project budget 

for each new Section 5307 grant 

application or amendment. Under this 

non-add scope, the applicant should 

repeat the full amount of any of the line 

items in the budget that are exclusively 

for security and include the portion of 

any other line item in the project budget 

that is attributable to security, using 

under the non-add scope the same line 

item used in the project budget. The 

grantee can modify the ALI description 

or use the extended text feature, if 

necessary, to describe the security 

expenditures. 

The grantee must provide information 

regarding its use of the one percent for 

security as part of each Section 5307 

grant application, using a special screen 

in TEAM–Web. If the grantee has 

certified that it is not necessary to 

expend one percent for security, the 

Section 5307 grant application must 

include information to support that 

certification. FTA will not process an 

application for a Section 5307 grant 

until the security information is 

complete. 

d. FY 2007 Operating Assistance. 

UZAs under 200,000 population may 

use Section 5307 funds for operating 

assistance. In addition, Section 5307, as 

amended by, SAFETEA–LU and TEA–

21, allows some UZAs with a 

population of 200,000 or more to use FY 

2007 Urbanized Area Formula funds for 

operating assistance under certain 

conditions. The specific provisions 

allowing the limited use of operating 

assistance in large UZAs are as follows: 

(1) Section 5307(b)(2) allows UZAs 

that grew in population from under 

200,000 to over 200,000, as a result of 

the 2000 Census to use FY 2007 funds 

for operating assistance in an amount up 

to 25 percent of the grandfathered 

amount for FY 2005 funds. (The 

provision is completely phased out in 

FY 2008.) Table 7 shows the maximum 

amount of each eligible UZA’s Section 

5307 apportionment that can be used for 

operating assistance. 

(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for 

grants for the operating costs of 

equipment and facilities for use in 

public transportation in the Evansville, 

IN–KY urbanized area, for a portion or 

portions of the UZA if: the portion of 

the UZA includes only one State; the 

population of the portion is less than 

30,000; and the grants will be not used 

to provide public transportation outside 

of the portion of the UZA. 

(3) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides 

operating costs of equipment and 

facilities for use in public transportation 

for local governmental authorities in 

areas which adopted transit operating 

and financing plans that became a part 

of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result 

of the 2000 decennial census of 

population, but lie outside the service 

area of the principal public 

transportation agency that serves the 

Houston UZA. 

(4) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the 

formula to be used to apportion Section 

5307 funds to UZAs with population of 

200,000 or more. SAFETEA–LU 

amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that 

stated, ‘‘* * * except that the amount 

apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized 

area under subsection (b) shall be 

available to the Alaska Railroad for any 

costs related to its passenger 

operations.’’ This language has the effect 

of directing that funds apportioned to 

the Anchorage urbanized area, under 

the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 

5307 apportionment formula, be made 

available to the Alaska Railroad, and 

that these funds may be used for any 

capital or operating costs related to its 

passenger operations. 

(5) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA–21, as 

amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note), 

provides an exception to the restriction 

on the use of operating assistance in a 

UZA with a population of 200,000 or 

more, by allowing transit providers/ 

grantees that provide service exclusively 

to elderly persons and persons with 

disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer 

vehicles to use Section 5307 funds 

apportioned to the UZA for operating 

assistance. The total amount of funding 

made available for this purpose under 

Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. 

Transit providers/grantees eligible 

under this provision have already been 

identified and notified. 

e. Sources of Local Match. Pursuant to 

Section 5307(e), the Federal share of an 

urbanized area formula grant is 80 

percent of net project cost for a capital 

project and 50 percent of net project 

cost for operating assistance. The 

remainder of the net project cost (i.e., 20 

percent and 50 percent, respectively) 

shall be provided from the following 

sources: 

1. In cash from non-Government 

sources other than revenues from 

providing public transportation 

services; 

2. From revenues derived from the 

sale of advertising and concessions; 

3. From an undistributed cash 

surplus, a replacement or depreciation 

cash fund or reserve, or new capital; 

4. From amounts received under a 

service agreement with a State or local 

social service agency or private social 

service organization; and 

5. Proceeds from the issuance of 

revenue bonds. 

In addition, funds from Section 

403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security 

Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be 

used to match Urbanized Area Formula 

funds. 

f. Designated Transportation 

Management Areas (TMA). Guidance for 

setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the 

joint transportation planning regulations 

codified at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR 

Part 613. In some cases, the TMA 

planning boundaries established by the 

MPO for the designated TMA includes 

one or more small UZAs. In addition, 

one small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has 

been designated as a TMA. In either of 

these situations, the Governor cannot 

allocate ‘‘Governor’s Apportionment’’

funds attributed to the small UZAs to 

other areas; that is, the Governor only 

has discretion to allocate Governor’s 

Apportionment funds attributable to 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13878 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

areas that are outside of designated 

TMA planning boundaries. 

The list of small UZAs included 

within the planning boundaries of 

designated TMAs is provided in the 

table below. 

Designated TMA Small urbanized area included in TMA planning boundary 

Albany, NY ............................................... Saratoga Springs, NY. 

Houston, TX ............................................. Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The Woodlands, TX. 

Jacksonville, FL ....................................... St. Augustine, FL. 

Orlando, FL .............................................. Kissimmee, FL. 

Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ......................... Titusville, FL. 

Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................. Pottstown, PA. 

Pittsburgh, PA .......................................... Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-Steubenville, OH–PA (PA portion); Uniontown-Connellsville, PA. 

Seattle, WA .............................................. Bremerton, WA. 

Washington, DC–VA–MD ........................ Frederick, MD. 

The MPO must notify the Associate 

Administrator for Program Management, 

Federal Transit Administration, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590, in writing, no later than July 1 

of each year, to identify any small UZA 

within the planning boundaries of a 

TMA. 

g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds 

Used for Highway Purposes. Funds 

apportioned to a TMA are eligible for 

transfer to FHWA for highway projects. 

However, before funds can be 

transferred, the following conditions 

must be met: (1) Such use must be 

approved by the MPO in writing, after 

appropriate notice and opportunity for 

comment and appeal are provided to 

affected transit providers; (2) in the 

determination of the Secretary, such 

funds are not needed for investments 

required by the Americans with 

Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3) 

the MPO determines that local transit 

needs are being addressed. 

The MPO should notify the 

appropriate FTA Regional 

Administrator of its intent to use FTA 

funds for highway purposes, as 

prescribed in section V.D below. 

Urbanized Area Formula funds that are 

designated by the MPO for highway 

projects will be transferred to and 

administered by FHWA. 

4. Period of Availability 

The Urbanized Area Formula Program 

funds apportioned in this notice remain 

available to be obligated by FTA to 

recipients until September 30, 2010. 

Any of these apportioned funds that 

remain unobligated at the close of 

business on September 30, 2010, will 

revert to FTA for reapportionment 

under the Urbanized Area Formula 

Program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

In each UZA with a population of 

200,000 or more, the Governor in 

consultation with responsible local 

officials, and publicly owned operators 

of public transportation has designated 

one or more entities to be the 

Designated Recipient for Section 5307 

funds apportioned to the UZA. The 

same entity(s) may or may not be the 

Designated Recipient for the Job Access 

and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New 

Freedom program funds apportioned to 

the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 

population, the State is the Designated 

Recipient for Section 5307 as well as 

JARC and New Freedom programs. The 

Designated Recipient for Section 5307 

may authorize other entities to apply 

directly to FTA for Section 5307 grants 

pursuant to a supplemental agreement. 

While the requirement that projects 

selected for funding be included in a 

locally developed coordinated public 

transit/human service transportation 

plan is not included in Section 5307 as 

it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and 

5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that 

in their role as public transit providers, 

recipients of Section 5307 funds will be 

participants in the local planning 

process for these programs. 

D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C. 

5308) 

The Clean Fuels Grant Program 

supports the use of alternative fuels in 

air quality maintenance or 

nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon 

monoxide through capital grants to 

urbanized areas for clean fuel vehicles 

and facilities. Previously an unfunded 

Formula Program under TEA–21, the 

program is now a discretionary program. 

FTA published a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking for the discretionary 

program on October 16, 2006, and is 

now in the process of reviewing 

comments and finalizing the rule. For 

more information about this program 

contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of 

Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $45,000,000 

to the Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 

U.S.C. 5308). SAFETEA–LU earmarked 

$18,721,000 for specific Clean Fuel 

projects. The balance of $26,279,000 

was transferred to the discretionary Bus 

Program. 

CLEAN FUELS GRANT PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $45,000,000 

Transfer to Bus and Bus 

Facility ......................... ¥$26,279,000 

Funds Allocated to 

SAFETEA–LU Earmarks .......................... 18,721,000 

Allocations to projects earmarked 

under the Clean Fuels program in 

SAFETEA–LU are displayed in Table 8. 

2. Basis for Allocation of Funds. 

Section 3044(b) of SAFETEA–LU 

included 16 projects to be funded 

through the Clean Fuels program. Table 

8 displays the amounts available in FY 

2007 to the Clean Fuels projects 

designated in SAFETEA–LU. FY 2006 

carryover funds are shown in Table 9. 

No funds are available for competitive 

allocation in FY 2007. 

3. Requirements 

Clean Fuels program funds may be 

made available to any grantee in a UZA 

that is designated as maintenance or 

nonattainment area for ozone or carbon 

monoxide as defined in the Clean Air 

Act. Eligible recipients include Section 

5307 Designated Recipients as well as 

recipients in small UZAs. In the case of 

a small UZA, the State in which the area 

is located will act as the recipient. 

Eligible projects include the purchase 

or lease of clean fuel buses (including 

buses that employ a lightweight 

composite primary structure), the 

construction or lease of clean fuel buses 

or electrical recharging facilities and 

related equipment for such buses, and 

construction or improvement of public 

transportation facilities to accommodate 

clean fuel buses. 

Legislation will be necessary if a 

recipient wishes to use Clean Fuels 

funds earmarked in SAFETEA–LU for 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13879 

eligible program activities outside the 

scope of a project description. 

Unless otherwise specified in law, 

grants made under the Clean Fuels 

program must meet all other eligibility 

requirements as outlined in Section 

5308. 

4. Period of Availability 

Funds designated for specific Clean 

Fuels Program projects remain available 

for obligation for three fiscal years, 

which includes the year of 

appropriation plus two additional fiscal 

years. The FY 2007 funding for projects 

included in this notice remains 

available through September 30, 2009. 

Clean Fuels funds not obligated in an 

FTA grant for their original purpose at 

the end of the period of availability will 

generally be made available for other 

projects. 

E. Capital Investment Program (49 

U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway 

Modernization 

This program provides capital 

assistance for the modernization of 

existing fixed guideway systems. Funds 

are allocated by a statutory formula to 

UZAs with fixed guideway systems that 

have been in operation for at least seven 

years. A ‘‘fixed guideway’’ refers to any 

transit service that uses exclusive or 

controlled rights-of-way or rails, entirely 

or in part. The term includes heavy rail, 

commuter rail, light rail, monorail, 

trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined 

plane, cable car, automated guideway 

transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor 

bus service operated on exclusive or 

controlled rights-of-way, and highoccupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible 

applicants are the public transit 

authorities in those urbanized areas to 

which the funds are allocated. For more 

information about Fixed Guideway 

Modernization contact Scott Faulk, 

Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–

2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides 

$1,448,000,000 to the Fixed Guideway 

Modernization Program. The total 

amount apportioned for the Fixed 

Guideway Modernization Program is 

$1,433,520,000, after the deduction for 

oversight, as shown in the table below. 

FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION

PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $1,448,000,000 

Oversight Deduction ....... ¥14,480,000 

Total Apportioned ........ 1,433,520,000 

The FY 2007 Fixed Guideway 

Modernization Program apportionments 

to eligible areas are displayed in Table 

10. 

2. Basis for Formula Apportionment 

The formula for allocating the Fixed 

Guideway Modernization funds 

contains seven tiers. The apportionment 

of funding under the first four tiers is 

based on amounts specified in law and 

NTD data used to apportion funds in FY 

1997. Funding under the last three tiers 

is apportioned based on the latest 

available data on route miles and 

revenue vehicle miles on segments at 

least seven years old, as reported to the 

NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. 

provides for the inclusion of 

Morgantown, West Virginia (population 

55,997) as an eligible UZA for purposes 

of apportioning fixed guideway 

modernization funds. Also, pursuant to 

49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent 

of the directional route miles 

attributable to the Alaska Railroad 

passenger operations system to calculate 

the apportionment for the Anchorage, 

Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 

Fixed Guideway Modernization 

formula. 

FY 2007 Formula apportionments are 

based on data grantees provided to the 

NTD for the 2005 reporting year. Table 

11 provides additional information and 

details on the formula. Dollar unit 

values for the formula factors used in 

the Fixed Guideway Modernization 

Program are displayed in Table 5. To 

replicate an area’s apportionment, 

multiply the dollar unit value by the 

appropriate formula factor, i.e., route 

miles and revenue vehicle miles. 

3. Program Requirements 

Fixed Guideway Modernization funds 

must be used for capital projects to 

maintain, modernize, or improve fixed 

guideway systems. Eligible UZAs (those 

with a population of 200,000 or more) 

with fixed guideway systems that are at 

least seven years old are entitled to 

receive Fixed Guideway Modernization 

funds. A threshold level of more than 

one mile of fixed guideway is required 

in order to receive Fixed Guideway 

Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs 

reporting one mile or less of fixed 

guideway mileage under the NTD are 

not included. However, funds 

apportioned to an urbanized area may 

be used on any fixed guideway segment 

in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed 

Guideway Modernization is presently 

found in FTA Circular C9300.1A, 

Capital Program: Grant Application 

Instructions, dated October 1, 1998. 

FTA is in the process of updating this 

circular to incorporate changes resulting 

from language in SAFETEA–LU. 

4. Period of Availability 

The funds apportioned in this notice 

under the Fixed Guideway 

Modernization Program remain 

available to be obligated by FTA to 

recipients for three fiscal years 

following FY 2007. Any of these 

apportioned funds that remain 

unobligated at the close of business on 

September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA 

for reapportionment under the Fixed 

Guideway Modernization Program. 

F. Capital Investment Program (49 

U.S.C. 5309)—Bus and Bus-Related 

Facilities 

This program provides capital 

assistance for new and replacement 

buses and related facilities. Funds are 

allocated on a discretionary basis. 

Eligible purposes are acquisition of 

buses for fleet and service expansion, 

bus maintenance and administrative 

facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls, 

transportation centers, intermodal 

terminals, park-and-ride stations, 

acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus 

rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance, 

passenger amenities such as passenger 

shelters and bus stop signs, accessory 

and miscellaneous equipment such as 

mobile radio units, supervisory 

vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and 

shop and garage equipment. Eligible 

applicants are State and local 

governmental authorities. Eligible 

subrecipients include other public 

agencies, private companies engaged in 

public transportation and private nonprofit organizations. For more 

information about Bus and Bus-Related 

Facilities contact Maria Wright, Office 

of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $881,779,000 

for the bus and bus facilities program. 

This amount includes $855,500,000 

provided for the Bus Program and 

$26,279,000 transferred from the Clean 

Fuels Program. The amount of funding 

for projects designated in Section 3044 

of SAFETEA–LU for Bus and BusRelated Facilities in FY 2007 is 

$459,670,089. The balance remains 

unallocated, as shown in the following 

table. 

BUS AND BUS FACILITY PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $881,779,000 a

Oversight Deduction ....... ¥8,817,790 

SAFETEA–LU Statutory 

Provisions Projects ..... 459,670,089 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13880 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

BUS AND BUS FACILITY PROGRAM

Funds Available for Discretionary/Competitive 

Allocation ..................... 413,291,121 

Total Funds to be Allocated ........................ 872,961,210 

a Includes $26,279,000 transferred from 

Clean Fuels Grant Program 

The FY 2007 Bus and Bus Facility 

Program allocations are displayed in 

Table 12. 

2. Basis for Allocations 

Funds are provided annually under 

Section 5309 for discretionary allocation 

for bus and bus facilities projects. 

SAFETEA–LU listed 646 earmarked 

projects to be funded each year through 

the Bus Program (Section 3044) and 

specified additional projects in Section 

5309(m)(7). Table 12 displays the 

allocation of the FY 2007 Bus and BusRelated Facilities funds by State and 

project for projects earmarked in 

SAFETEA–LU. The table includes a 

SAFETEA–LU project number for each 

project listed in Section 3044. No 

additional projects were earmarked in 

the Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007. In fact, Section 112 of 

the Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, (H.J. Res 20) 

specifically precluded using FY 2007 

funds to award grants for projects 

designated Section 5309 bus funds in 

the statement of managers 

accompanying the FY 2006 Department 

of Transportation Appropriations Act 

(Pub. L. 109–115). 

3. Requirements 

Section 125 and Section 113 of the FY 

2005 and FY 2006 Department of 

Transportation Appropriations Acts, 

respectively, make projects identified in 

the statement of managers automatically 

eligible to receive the funds designated 

to the project ‘‘notwithstanding any 

other provision of law.’’ Similar 

language was first included as a general 

provision in Section 547 of the FY 2004 

Department of Transportation 

Appropriations Acts. In addition, 

Section 3044 of SAFETEA–LU 

earmarked 646 Bus and Bus Facilities 

projects in FY 2007. FTA will review 

Congressional intent on a case by case 

basis. 

FTA honors Congressional earmarks 

for the purpose designated, for purposes 

eligible under the program or under the 

expanded eligibility of a 

‘‘notwithstanding’’ provision. If you 

want to apply to use funds designated 

under the Bus Program in any year for 

project activities outside the scope of 

the project designation included in 

report language, you must submit your 

request for reprogramming to the House 

and Senate Committees on 

Appropriations for resolution. FTA will 

not reprogram projects Congress 

designated in report language without 

direction from the Appropriations 

Committees. 

FTA will honor projects earmarked to 

receive Section 5309 bus funds in 

SAFETEA–LU. Legislation will be 

necessary to amend the earmark if you 

wish to use funds for project activities 

outside the scope of the project 

description. 

Grants made under the Bus and BusRelated Facilities program must meet all 

other eligibility requirements as 

outlined in Section 5309 unless 

otherwise specified in law. 

Program guidance for Bus and BusRelated Facilities is found in FTA 

Circular C9300.1A, Capital Program: 

Grant Application Instructions. FTA is 

in the process of updating this circular 

to incorporate changes resulting from 

language in SAFETEA–LU. 

4. Period of Availability 

The FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related 

Facilities funds not obligated for their 

original purpose as of September 30, 

2009, may be made available for other 

projects under 49 U.S.C. 5309. The 

unusual appropriations process in FY 

2007 has not yet resulted in directions 

from Congress to FTA not to reallocate 

unobligated bus program funds for 

designations that lapsed at the end of 

FY 2006. 

5. Other Program or Allocation Related 

Information and Highlights 

Prior year unobligated balances for 

Bus and Bus-Related allocations in the 

amount of $870,471,637 remain 

available for obligation in FY 2007. This 

includes $861,331,362 in fiscal years 

2005 and 2006 unobligated allocations, 

and $9,140,275 for fiscal years 2002–

2004 unobligated allocations that were 

extended by previous direction by the 

House and Senate appropriation 

committees. The unobligated amounts 

available as of September 30, 2006, are 

displayed in Table 13. 

In two Notices of Funding 

Availability (NOFA), published as 

separate parts of today’s Federal 

Register, FTA is issuing procedures for 

grantees to apply competitively for 

discretionary funding for projects 

eligible under the Bus and Bus Facilities 

program. One NOFA invites 

applications from States and from 

Designated Recipients under the 

Urbanized Area Formula Program to 

fund bus and bus facility projects that 

address the following FTA priorities: 

Fleet replacement needs that cannot be 

met with formula funds, fleet expansion 

for significant service improvements, 

purchase of clean fuel vehicles, facility 

construction to support increased 

service or introduction of clean fuels, 

and intermodal terminal projects that 

include intercity bus providers, and 

Gulf Coast recovery. The other NOFA 

addresses the Department of 

Transportation Congestion Initiative and 

invites proposals from specific 

urbanized areas identified as the most 

congested in the nation. 

G. Capital Investment Program (49 

U.S.C. 5309)—New Starts 

The New Starts program provides 

funds for construction of new fixed 

guideway systems or extensions to 

existing fixed guideway systems. 

Eligible purposes are light rail, rapid rail 

(heavy rail), commuter rail, monorail, 

automated fixed guideway system (such 

as a ‘‘people mover’’), or a busway/high 

occupancy vehicle (HOV) facility, Bus 

Rapid Transit that is fixed guideway, or 

an extension of any of these. Projects 

become candidates for funding under 

this program by successfully completing 

the appropriate steps in the major 

capital investment planning and project 

development process. Major new fixed 

guideway projects, or extensions to 

existing systems, financed with New 

Starts funds typically receive these 

funds through a full funding grant 

agreement (FFGA) that defines the scope 

of the project and specifies the total 

multi-year Federal commitment to the 

project. Beginning in FY 2007, up to 

$200,000,000 each year is designated for 

‘‘Small Starts’’ (Section 5309(e)) projects 

with a New Starts share of less than 

$75,000,000 and a net project cost of 

less than $250,000,000. The Continuing 

Appropriations Resolution, 2007, 

however, did not set aside a specific 

amount for Small Starts from the 

amounts appropriated for Capital 

Investment Grants. 

Section 5309(m)(6) also made annual 

allocations of New Start funding 

available to Alaska and Hawaii for 

ferryboats and to the Denali 

Commission in Anchorage, Alaska 

under the terms of Section 307(e) of the 

Denali Commission Act of 1998 (42 

U.S.C. 3121) for docks, waterfront 

development projects and related 

transportation infrastructure in rural 

Alaska communities. 

For more information about New 

Starts project development contact Sean 

Libberton, Office of Planning and 

Environment, at (202) 366–4033, or for 

information about published allocations 

contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of 

Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13881 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides 

$1,566,000,000 to New Starts. The total 

amount allocated for New Starts is 

$1,550,340,000, as shown in the table 

below. 

NEW STARTS

Total Appropriation ....... $1,566,000,000 a

Oversight Deduction ..... ¥15,660,000 

Funds Allocated to Specific Projects in Table 

14 .............................. b 1,284,478,399 

Unallocated Funds 

Available for Discretionary/Competitive 

Allocation ................... 265,861,601 

Total Funds to be Allocated ................... 1,550,340,000 

a Includes $200 million for Small Starts. 

b Includes $20 million for the Denali Commission and Alaska and Hawaii Ferry projects. 

2. Basis for Allocation 

Congress included authorizations for 

specific New Starts projects in 

SAFETEA–LU and in statutory 

takedowns from the program for Alaska 

and Hawaii Ferryboats and the Denali 

Commission. The Continuing 

Appropriations Resolution, 2007, did 

not include project allocations. FTA has 

allocated available FY 2007 New Starts 

funding as shown in Table 14, based on 

existing FFGAs and the President’s 

Budget for FY 2007. 

3. Requirements 

Because New Starts projects are 

earmarked in law rather than report 

language, reprogramming for a purpose 

other than that specified must also 

occur in law. New Starts projects are 

subject to a complex set of approvals 

related to planning and project 

development set forth in 49 CFR Part 

611. FTA has published a number of 

rulemakings and interim guidance 

documents related to the New Starts 

program since the passage of SAFETEA–

LU. Grantees should reference the FTA 

Web site at http://www.fta.dot.gov for 

the most current program guidance 

about project developments and 

management. Grant related guidance for 

New Starts is found in FTA Circular 

C9300.1A, Capital Program: Grant 

Application Instructions, dated October 

1, 1998; and C5200.1A, Full Funding 

Grant Agreement Guidance, dated 

December 5, 2002. FTA is in the process 

of updating these circulars to 

incorporate changes resulting from 

language in SAFETEA–LU and recent 

rulemakings. 

4. Period of Availability 

New Starts funds remain available for 

three fiscal years (including the fiscal 

year the funds are made available or 

appropriated plus two additional years.) 

FY 2007 funds remain available through 

September 30, 2009. Funds may be 

extended by Congress or made available 

for other projects after the period of 

availability has expired. The unusual 

appropriations process in FY 2007 has 

not yet resulted in any extensions of 

prior year unobligated balances that 

lapsed at the end of FY 2006. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

Prior year unobligated allocations for 

New Starts in the amount of 

$717,087,493 remain available for 

obligation in FY 2007. This amount 

includes $118,384,337 in FY 2005 and 

$598,703,156 in FY 2006 unobligated 

allocations. These unobligated amounts 

are displayed in Table 15. Information 

on pre-award authority for New Starts 

projects is detailed in section V below. 

H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals 

and Individuals With Disabilities 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5310) 

This program provides formula 

funding to States for capital projects to 

assist private nonprofit groups in 

meeting the transportation needs of the 

elderly and individuals with disabilities 

when the public transportation service 

provided in the area is unavailable, 

insufficient, or inappropriate to meet 

these needs. A State agency designated 

by the Governor administers the Section 

5310 program. The State’s 

responsibilities include: notifying 

eligible local entities of funding 

availability; developing project selection 

criteria; determining applicant 

eligibility; selecting projects for funding; 

and ensuring that all subrecipients 

comply with Federal requirements. 

Eligible nonprofit organizations or 

public bodies must apply directly to the 

designated State agency for assistance 

under this program. For more 

information about the Elderly and 

Individuals with Disabilities Program 

contact Cheryl Oliver, Office of Transit 

Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $117,000,000 

to the Elderly and Individuals with 

Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310). 

After deduction of 0.5 percent for 

oversight, and the addition of 

reapportioned prior year funds, 

$116,659,554 remains available for 

allocation to the States. 

ELDERLY AND INDIVIDUALS WITH

DISABILITIES PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $117,000,000 

Oversight Deduction ....... ¥585,000 

Prior Year Funds Added 244,554 

Total Apportioned ........ 116,659,554 

The FY 2007 Elderly and Individuals 

with Disabilities Program 

apportionments to the States are 

displayed in Table 16. 

2. Basis for Apportionment 

FTA allocates funds to the States by 

an administrative formula consisting of 

a $125,000 floor for each State ($50,000 

for smaller territories) with the balance 

allocated based on 2000 Census 

population data for persons aged 65 and 

over and for persons with disabilities. 

3. Requirements 

Funds are available to support the 

capital costs of transportation services 

for older adults and people with 

disabilities. Uniquely under this 

program, eligible capital costs include 

the acquisition of service. Seven 

specified States (Alaska, Louisiana, 

Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon, 

South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use 

up to 33 percent of their apportionment 

for operating assistance under the terms 

of the SAFETEA–LU Section 3012(b) 

pilot program. 

Capital assistance is provided on an 

80 percent Federal, 20 percent local 

matching basis except that Section 

5310(c) allows States eligible for a 

higher match under the sliding scale for 

FHWA programs to use that match ratio 

for Section 5310 capital projects. 

Operating assistance is 50 percent 

Federal, 50 percent local, or the 62.5 

percent of the sliding scale Federal 

share. Funds provided under other 

Federal programs (other than those of 

the DOT, with the exception of the 

Federal Lands Highway Program 

established by 23 U.S.C. 204) may be 

used as match. Revenue from service 

contracts may also be used as local 

match. 

While the assistance is intended 

primarily for private non-profit 

organizations, public bodies approved 

by the State to coordinate services for 

the elderly and individuals with 

disabilities, or any public body that 

certifies to the State that there are no 

non-profit organizations in the area that 

are readily available to carry out the 

service, may receive these funds. 

States may use up to ten percent of 

their annual apportionment to 

administer, plan, and provide technical 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13882 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

assistance for a funded project. No local 

share is required for these program 

administrative funds. Funds used under 

this program for planning must be 

shown in the United Planning Work 

Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with 

responsibility for that area. 

The State recipient must certify that: 

the projects selected were derived from 

a locally developed, coordinated public 

transit-human services transportation 

plan; and, the plan was developed 

through a process that included 

representatives of public, private, and 

nonprofit transportation and human 

services providers and participation by 

the public. The locally developed, 

coordinated public transit-human 

services transportation planning process 

must be coordinated and consistent 

with the metropolitan and statewide 

planning processes and funding for the 

program must included in the 

metropolitan and statewide 

Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP 

and STIP) at a level of specificity or 

aggregation consistent with State and 

local policies and procedures. Finally, 

the State must certify that allocations of 

the grant to subrecipients are made on 

a fair and equitable basis. 

The coordinated planning 

requirement is also a requirement in two 

additional programs. Projects selected 

for funding under the Job Access 

Reverse Commute program and the New 

Freedom program are also required to be 

derived from a locally developed 

coordinated public transit/human 

service transportation plan. FTA 

anticipates that most areas will develop 

one consolidated plan for all the 

programs, which may include separate 

elements and other human service 

transportation programs. 

The Section 5310 program is subject 

to the requirements of Section 5307 to 

the extent the Secretary determines 

appropriate. Program guidance is found 

in FTA C 9070.1E, dated October 1, 

1998. FTA published a proposed revised 

circular for this program and is 

currently reviewing comments 

submitted to the docket. The new 

circular will be posted on the FTA Web 

site at http://www.fta.dot.gov when it is 

issued. 

4. Period of Availability 

FTA has administratively established 

a three year period of availability for 

Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to 

States under the Elderly and Individuals 

with Disabilities Program in this notice 

must be obligated by September 30, 

2009. Any funding that remains 

unobligated as of that date will revert to 

FTA for reapportionment among the 

States under the Elderly and Individuals 

with Disabilities Program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

States may transfer Section 5310 

funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311, 

but only for projects selected under the 

Section 5310 program, not as a general 

supplement for those programs. FTA 

anticipates that the States would use 

this flexibility primarily for projects to 

be implemented by a Section 5307 

recipient in a small urbanized area, or 

for Federally recognized Indian Tribes 

that elect to receive funds as a direct 

recipient from FTA under Section 5311. 

A State that transfers Section 5310 

funds to Section 5307 must certify that 

each project for which the funds are 

transferred has been coordinated with 

private nonprofit providers of services. 

FTA has established a new scope code 

(641) to track 5310 projects included 

within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. 

Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is 

permitted but not required. FTA expects 

primarily to award stand-alone Section 

5310 grants to the State for any and all 

subrecipients. 

I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program 

(49 U.S.C. 5311) 

This program provides formula 

funding to States and Indian Tribes for 

the purpose of supporting public 

transportation in areas with a 

population of less than 50,000. Funding 

may be used for capital, operating, State 

administration, and project 

administration expenses. Eligible 

subrecipients include State and local 

public agencies, Indian Tribes, private 

non-profit organizations, and private 

operators of public transportation 

services, including intercity bus 

companies. Indian Tribes are also 

eligible direct recipients under Section 

5311, both for funds apportioned to the 

States and for projects selected to be 

funded with funds set aside for a 

separate Tribal Transit Program. 

For more information about the 

Nonurbanized Area Formula Program 

contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit 

Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $404,000,000 

to the Nonurbanized Area Formula 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5311). The total 

amount apportioned for the 

Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is 

$386,179,139, after take-downs of two 

percent for the Rural Transportation 

Assistance Program (RTAP), 0.5 percent 

for oversight, and $10,000,000 for the 

Tribal Transit Program, and the addition 

of Section 5340 funds and prior year 

funds reapportioned, as shown in the 

table below. 

NONURBANIZED AREA FORMULA

PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $404,000,000 

Oversight Deduction ....... 2,020,000 

RTAP Takedown ............ 8,080,000 

Tribal Transit Takedown 10,000,000 

Prior Year Funds Added 2,277,688 

Section 5340 Funds 

Added .......................... 63,265,514 

Total Apportioned ........ 449,443,202 

The FY 2007 Nonurbanized Area 

Formula apportionments to the States 

are displayed in Table 17. 

2. Basis for Apportionments 

FTA apportions the funds available 

for apportionment after take-down for 

oversight, the Tribal Transit Program, 

and RTAP according to a statutory 

formula. FTA apportions the first 

twenty percent to the States based on 

land area in nonurbanized areas with no 

state receiving more than 5 percent of 

the amount apportioned. FTA 

apportions the remaining eighty percent 

based on nonurbanized population of 

each State relative to the national 

nonurbanized population. FTA does not 

apportion Section 5311 funds to the 

Virgin Islands, which by a statutory 

exception are treated as an urbanized 

area for purposes of the Section 5307 

formula program. 

FTA also allocated $63,265,514 to the 

50 States for nonurbanized areas from 

the Growing States portion of Section 

5340. FTA apportions Growing States 

funds by a formula based on State 

population forecasts for 15 years beyond 

the most recent census. FTA distributes 

the amounts apportioned for each State 

between UZAs and nonurbanized areas 

based on the ratio of urbanized/ 

nonurbanized population within each 

State in the 2000 census. 

3. Program Requirements 

The Nonurbanized Area Formula 

Program provides capital, operating and 

administrative assistance for public 

transit service in areas under 50,000 in 

population. 

The Federal share for capital 

assistance is 80 percent and for 

operating assistance is 50 percent, 

except that States eligible for the sliding 

scale match under FHWA programs may 

use that match ratio for Section 5311 

capital projects and 62.5 percent of the 

sliding scale capital match ratio for 

operating projects. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13883 

Each State must spend no less than 15 

percent of its FY 2007 Nonurbanized 

Area Formula apportionment for the 

development and support of intercity 

bus transportation, unless the State 

certifies, after consultation with affected 

intercity bus service providers, that the 

intercity bus service needs of the State 

are being adequately met. SAFETEA–LU 

added this requirement for consultation 

with the industry to strengthen the 

certification requirement. FTA also 

encourages consultation with other 

stakeholders, such as communities 

affected by loss of intercity service. 

Each State prepares an annual 

program of projects, which must 

provide for fair and equitable 

distribution of funds within the States, 

including Indian reservations, and must 

provide for maximum feasible 

coordination with transportation 

services assisted by other Federal 

sources. 

In order to retain eligibility for 

funding, recipients of Section 5311 

funding must report data annually to the 

NTD, beginning with the 2006 reporting 

year. 

Program guidance for the 

Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is 

found in FTA C 9040.1F, Nonurbanized 

Area Formula Program Guidance and 

Grant Application Instructions, dated 

April 1, 2007, which was revised and 

reissued after notice and comment. FTA 

announced availability of this circular 

in the Federal Register on February 28, 

2007, and summarized the response to 

comments submitted to the docket. 

4. Period of Availability 

Funds apportioned to nonurbanized 

areas under the Nonurbanized Area 

Formula Program will remain available 

for two fiscal years following FY 2007. 

Any funds that remain unobligated at 

the close of business on September 30, 

2009, will revert to FTA for allocation 

among the States under the 

Nonurbanized Area Formula Program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

By law, FTA requires that each 

recipient under the Section 5311 

program submit an annual report to the 

NTD containing information on capital 

investments, operations, and service 

provided with funds received under the 

Section 5311 program. Section 

5311(b)(4), as amended by SAFETEA–

LU, specifies that the report should 

include information on total annual 

revenue, sources of revenue, total 

annual operating costs, total annual 

capital costs, fleet size and type, and 

related facilities, revenue vehicle miles, 

and ridership. In consultation with State 

Departments of Transportation (DOT), 

FTA previously developed a voluntary 

state-based rural data module for the 

NTD. The existing NTD Rural Data 

Reporting Module manual and reporting 

instructions are posted on the NTD Web 

site, http://www.ntdprogram.com. For 

each 5311 subrecipient, the State DOT 

will complete a one-page form of basic 

data. The existing module will serve as 

a basis for reporting requirements for 

the new, mandatory Rural Reporting 

Module of the NTD until FTA can 

modify it, in consultation with the 

States, among others. Pursuant to 

SAFETEA–LU, mandatory reporting 

began with the 2006 NTD Report Year. 

The first reports were due on October 

28, 2006, for those States with State or 

local fiscal years ending between 

January 1 and June 30, 2006; on January 

28, 2007, for those States with State or 

local fiscal years ending between July 1 

and September 30, 2006; and April 30, 

2007, for those States with State or local 

fiscal years ending between October 1 

and December 31, 2006. Corresponding 

dates are applicable to the data for the 

2007 NTD Report Year. To enter data 

and receive additional instructions, 

State DOTs can go to the NTD website. 

FTA will issue revised reporting 

instructions in the 2007 reporting 

manual, based on consultation with the 

States and public comment. 

J. Rural Transportation Assistance 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3)) 

This program provides funding to 

assist in the design and implementation 

of training and technical assistance 

projects, research, and other support 

services tailored to meet the needs of 

transit operators in nonurbanized areas. 

For more information about Rural 

Transportation Assistance Program 

(RTAP) contact Lorna Wilson, Office of 

Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $8,080,000 

to RTAP (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)), as a two 

percent takedown from the funds 

appropriated for Section 5311. FTA has 

reserved 15 percent for the National 

RTAP program. After adding prior year 

funds eligible for reapportionment, 

$7,320,588 is available for allocations to 

the States, as shown in the table below. 

RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $8,080,000 

National RTAP Takedown ............................ 1,212,000 

RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM—Continued 

Prior Year Funds Added 452,588 

Total Apportioned ........ 7,320,588 

Table 17 shows the FY 2007 RTAP 

allocations to the States. 

2. Basis for Allocation 

FTA allocates funds to the States by 

an administrative formula. First FTA 

allocates $65,000 to each State ($10,000 

to territories), and then allocates the 

balance based on nonurbanized 

population in the 2000 census. 

3. Program Requirements 

States may use the funds to undertake 

research, training, technical assistance, 

and other support services to meet the 

needs of transit operators in 

nonurbanized areas. These funds are to 

be used in conjunction with a State’s 

administration of the Nonurbanized 

Area Formula Program, but may also 

support the rural components of the 

Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom 

programs. 

4. Period of Availability 

Funds apportioned to States under 

RTAP remain available for two fiscal 

years following FY 2007. Any funds that 

remain unobligated at the close of 

business on September 30, 2009, will 

revert to FTA for allocation among the 

States under the RTAP. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

The National RTAP project is 

administered by the American Public 

Works Association in consortium with 

the Community Transportation 

Association of America, under a 

cooperative agreement re-competed at 

five-year intervals. During FY 2007, 

FTA will be soliciting proposals for the 

National RTAP program services for the 

next five years. The projects are guided 

by a project review board of managers 

of rural transit systems and State DOT 

RTAP programs. National RTAP 

resources also support the biennial TRB 

National Conference on Rural Public 

and Intercity Bus Transportation and 

other research and technical assistance 

projects of a national nature. 

The percentage takedown for RTAP, 

combined with rising funding levels for 

Section 5311, make additional resources 

available at the State RTAP program 

level as well as the national RTAP for 

projects such as providing technical 

assistance for the new tribal transit 

program and conducting intercity bus 

needs assessments. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13884 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

K. Public Transportation on Indian 

Reservations Program (49 U.S.C. 

5311(c)(1)) 

FTA refers to this program as the 

Tribal Transit Program. It is funded as 

a takedown from funds appropriated for 

the Section 5311 program. Indian Tribes 

are defined as eligible direct recipients. 

The funds are to be apportioned for 

grants to Indian Tribes for any purpose 

eligible under Section 5311, which 

includes capital, operating, planning, 

and administrative assistance for rural 

public transit services and rural 

intercity bus service. For more 

information about the Tribal Transit 

Program contact Lorna Wilson, Office of 

Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 

Under the Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, the amount allocated 

to the program in FY 2007 is 

$10,000,000, as authorized in Section 

5311(c)(1)(B). 

2. Basis for Allocation 

Based on procedures developed in 

consultation with the Tribes, FTA will 

issue a Notice of Funding Availability 

(NOFA) soliciting applications for FY 

2007 funds. 

3. Requirements 

FTA developed streamlined program 

requirements based on statutory 

authority allowing the Secretary to 

determine the terms and conditions 

appropriate to the program. These 

conditions are contained in the annual 

NOFA. 

4. Period of Availability 

Funds remain available for three fiscal 

years, which includes the fiscal year the 

funds were apportioned or appropriated 

plus two additional years. Funds 

appropriated in FY 2007 will remain 

available for obligation to the tribes 

competitively selected to receive the 

funds through September 30, 2009. Any 

funds that remain unobligated after 

September 30, 2009, will revert to FTA 

for reallocation among the Tribes. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

The funds set aside for the Tribal 

Transit Program are not meant to 

replace or reduce funds that Indian 

Tribes receive from states through the 

Section 5311 program but are to be used 

to enhance public transportation on 

Indian reservations and transit serving 

tribal communities. Funds allocated to 

Tribes by the States may be included in 

the State’s Section 5311 application or 

awarded by FTA in a grant directly to 

the tribe. We encourage Tribes 

intending to apply to FTA as direct 

recipients to contact the appropriate 

FTA regional office at the earliest 

opportunity. 

Technical assistance for Tribes may 

be available from the State DOT using 

the State’s allocation of RTAP or funds 

available for State administration under 

Section 5311, from the Tribal 

Transportation Assistance Program 

(TTAP) Centers supported by FHWA, 

and from the Community 

Transportation Association of America 

under a program funded by the United 

States Department of Agriculture 

(USDA). The National RTAP will also be 

developing new resources for Tribal 

Transit. 

L. National Research Programs (49 

U.S.C. 5314) 

FTA’s National Research Programs 

include the National Research and 

Technology Program (NRTP), the 

Transit Cooperative Research Program 

(TCRP), the National Transit Institute 

(NTI), and the University Transportation 

Centers Program (UTC). 

Through funding under these 

programs, FTA seeks to deliver 

solutions that improve public 

transportation. FTA’s Strategic Research 

Goals are to provide transit research 

leadership, increase transit ridership, 

improve capital and operating 

efficiencies, improve safety and 

emergency preparedness, and to protect 

the environment and promote energy 

independence. For more information 

contact Bruce Robinson, Office of 

Research, Demonstration and 

Innovation, at (202) 366–4209. 

1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $61,000,000 

for the National Research Programs. Of 

this amount $9,300,000 is allocated for 

TCRP, $4,300,000 for NTI, $7,000,000 

for the UTC, and $40,400,000 for NRTP. 

Within the NRTP—$22,800,920 is 

allocated for specific activities under 49 

U.S.C. 5338(d) and in Section 3046 of 

SAFETEA–LU. A breakdown of NRP 

funds is provided in the table below. 

NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS

Total Appropriation ......... $61,000,000 

Funds Allocated for Specific Programs or Activities .......................... 43,400,920 

Small Business Innovative Research Takedown ............................ 200,000 

Funds Available for FTA 

Programming ............... 17,399,080 

NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS—

Continued 

Total NPR Funding ..... 61,000,000 

All research and research and 

development projects are subject to a 

2.6% reduction for the Small Business 

Innovative Research Program (SBIR). 

The project allocations are listed in 

Table 18. 

2. Program Requirements 

Application Instructions and Program 

Management Guidelines are set forth in 

FTA Circular 6100.1C. Research projects 

must support FTA’s Strategic Research 

Goals and meet the Office of 

Management and Budget’s Research and 

Development Investment Criteria. All 

research recipients are required to work 

with FTA to develop approved 

Statements of Work and plans to 

evaluate research results before award. 

Eligible activities under the NRTP 

include research, development, 

demonstration and deployment projects 

as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5312(a); Joint 

Partnership projects for deployment of 

innovation as defined by 49 U.S.C. 

5312(b); International Mass 

Transportation Projects as defined by 49 

U.S.C. 5312(c); and, human resource 

programs as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5322. 

Problem Statements for TCRP can be 

submitted on TCRP’s website: http:// 

www.tcrponline.org. Information about 

NTI courses can be found at http:// 

www.ntionline.com. UTC funds are 

transferred to the Research and 

Innovative Technology Administration 

to make awards. 

3. Period of Availability 

Funds are available until expended. 

4. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

Funds not designated by Congress for 

specific projects and activities will be 

programmed by FTA based on national 

priorities. Opportunities are posted in 

www.grants.gov under Catalogue of 

Federal Domestic Assistance Number 

20.514. 

M. Job Access and Reverse Commute 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5316) 

The Job Access and Reverse Commute 

(JARC) program provides formula 

funding to States and Designated 

Recipients to support the development 

and maintenance of job access projects 

designed to transport welfare recipients 

and eligible low-income individuals to 

and from jobs and activities related to 

their employment, and for reverse 

commute projects designed to transport 

residents of UZAs and other than 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13885 

urbanized to suburban employment 

opportunities. For more information 

about the JARC program contact Henrika 

Buchanan-Smith, Office of Transit 

Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $144,000,000 

for the JARC Program. The total amount 

apportioned by formula is $144,000,000, 

as shown in the table below. 

JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE

PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $144,000,000 

Total Apportioned ........ 144,000,000 

Table 19 shows the FY 2007 JARC 

apportionments. 

2. Basis for Formula Apportionment 

By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of 

funds available to UZAs with 

populations of 200,000 or more persons 

(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for 

urbanized areas with populations 

ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons 

(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the 

States for rural and small urban areas 

with populations of less than 50,000 

persons. FTA apportions funds based 

upon the number of low income 

individuals residing in a State or large 

urbanized area, using data from the 

2000 Census for individuals below 150 

percent of poverty. FTA publishes 

apportionments to each State for small 

UZAs and for rural and small urban 

areas and a single apportionment for 

each large UZA. 

The Designated Recipient, either for 

the State or for a large UZA, is 

responsible for further allocating the 

funds to specific projects and 

subrecipients through a competitive 

selection process. If the Governor has 

designated more than one recipient of 

JARC funds in a large UZA, the 

Designated Recipients may agree to 

conduct a single competitive selection 

process or sub-allocate funds to each 

Designated Recipient, based upon a 

percentage split agreed upon locally, 

and conduct separate competitions. 

States may transfer funds between the 

small UZA and the nonurbanized 

apportionments, if all of the objectives 

of JARC are met in the size area the 

funds are taken from. States may also 

use funds in the small UZA and 

nonurbanized area apportionments for 

projects anywhere in the State 

(including large UZAs) if the State has 

established a statewide program for 

meeting the objectives of JARC. A State 

planning to transfer funds under either 

of these provisions should submit a 

request to the FTA regional office. FTA 

will assign new accounting codes to the 

funds before obligating them in a grant. 

3. Requirements 

States and Designated Recipients 

must solicit grant applications and 

select projects competitively, based on 

application procedures and 

requirements established by the 

Designated Recipient, consistent with 

the Federal JARC program objectives. In 

the case of large UZAs, the area-wide 

solicitation shall be conducted in 

cooperation with the appropriate 

MPO(s). 

Funds are available to support the 

planning, capital and operating costs of 

transportation services that address the 

needs of welfare recipients and eligible 

low-income individuals that are not met 

by other transportation services. The 

transportation services may be provided 

by public, non-profit, or private-forprofit operators. The Federal share is 80 

percent of capital expenses and 50 

percent of operating expenses. Funds 

provided under other Federal programs 

(other than those of the U.S. DOT) may 

be used for local/State match for funds 

provided under section 5316, and 

revenue from service contracts may be 

used as local match. 

Funding is available for transportation 

services provided by public, non-profit, 

or private-for-profit operators. 

Assistance may be provided for a variety 

of transportation services and strategies 

directed at assisting welfare recipients 

and eligible low-income individuals 

address unmet transportation needs, 

and to provide reverse commute 

services. 

States and Designated Recipients may 

use up to ten percent of their annual 

apportionment to administer, plan, and 

provide technical assistance for a 

funded project. No local share is 

required for these program 

administrative funds. Funds used under 

this program for planning must be 

shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with 

responsibility for that area. 

The Designated Recipient must certify 

that: The projects selected were derived 

from a locally developed, coordinated 

public transit-human services 

transportation plan; and, the plan was 

developed through a process that 

included representatives of public, 

private, and nonprofit transportation 

and human services providers and 

participation by the public, including 

those representing the needs of welfare 

recipients and eligible low-income 

individuals. The locally developed, 

coordinated public transit-human 

services transportation planning process 

must be coordinated and consistent 

with the metropolitan and statewide 

planning processes and funding for the 

program must included in the 

metropolitan and statewide 

Transportation Improvement Program 

(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity 

or aggregation consistent with State and 

local policies and procedures. Finally, 

the State must certify that allocations of 

the grant to subrecipients are made on 

a fair and equitable basis. 

The coordinated planning 

requirement is also a requirement in two 

additional programs. Projects selected 

for funding under the Section 5310 

program and the New Freedom program 

are also required to be derived from a 

locally developed coordinated public 

transit-human service transportation 

plan. FTA anticipates that most areas 

will develop one consolidated plan for 

all the programs, which may include 

separate elements and other human 

service transportation programs. 

The JARC program is subject to the 

relevant requirements of Section 5307, 

including the requirement for 

certification of labor protections. FTA 

published a proposed circular for this 

program and is currently reviewing 

comments submitted to the docket. The 

new circular will be posted on the FTA 

Web site at http://www.fta.dot.gov when 

it is issued. 

4. Period of Availability 

FTA is establishing a consistent threeyear period of availability for JARC, 

New Freedom, and the Section 5310 

program, which includes the year of 

apportionment plus two additional 

years. FY 2007 funding is available 

through FY 2009. Any funding that 

remains unobligated on September 30, 

2009 will revert to FTA for 

reapportionment among the States and 

large UZAs under the JARC program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

a. Carryover Earmarks. Table 20 lists 

prior year carryover of $45,154,056 for 

JARC projects designated by Congress in 

FYs 2002–2005. JARC earmarks carried 

over from TEA–21 are subject to the 

terms and conditions under which they 

were originally appropriated, including 

the requirement for a 50 percent local 

share for both capital and operating 

assistance. All projects should be in a 

regional JARC Plan as required under 

TEA–21 or in the new local coordinated 

plan required by the new formula JARC 

program. FTA will award a grant for a 

designated project upon receipt of a 

complete application, but can honor 

changes to the original designation only 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13886 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

if so directed by the Appropriations 

Committee chairs. 

b. Designated Recipient. Beginning in 

FY 2007, FTA must have received 

formal notification from the Governor or 

Governor’s designee of the Designated 

Recipient for JARC funds apportioned to 

a State or large UZA before awarding a 

grant to that area for JARC projects. 

c. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311. 

States may transfer JARC funds to 

Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only 

for projects competitively selected 

under the JARC program, not as a 

general supplement for those programs. 

FTA anticipates that the States would 

use this flexibility primarily for projects 

to be implemented by a Section 5307 

recipient in a small urbanized area or 

for Federally recognized Indian Tribes 

that elect to receive funds as a direct 

recipient from FTA under Section 5311. 

FTA has established a new scope code 

(646) to track JARC projects included 

within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. 

Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is 

permitted but not required. FTA will 

also award stand-alone Section 5316 

grants to the State for any and all 

subrecipients. In order to track 

disbursements accurately against the 

appropriate program, FTA will not 

combine JARC funds with Section 5307 

funds in a single Section 5307 grant, nor 

will FTA combine JARC with New 

Freedom funds in a single Section 5307 

grant. 

d. Evaluation. Section 5316(i)(2), as 

added by SAFETEA–LU, requires FTA 

to conduct a study to evaluate the 

effectiveness of the JARC program. To 

support the evaluation, annual GAO 

reports on the program, and DOT 

Performance Measures, while reducing 

the burden grantees previously 

experienced from separate reporting 

required for the JARC program under 

TEA–21, FTA has incorporated 

reporting for performance measures into 

the annual progress report all JARC 

grantees submit in TEAM. 

N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 

5317) 

SAFETEA–LU established the New 

Freedom Program under 49 U.S.C. 5317. 

The program purpose is to provide new 

public transportation services and 

public transportation alternatives 

beyond those currently required by the 

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 

(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) that assist 

individuals with disabilities with 

transportation, including transportation 

to and from jobs and employment 

support services. For more information 

about the New Freedom program 

contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith, Office 

of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $81,000,000 

for the New Freedom Program. The 

entire amount is apportioned by 

formula, as shown in the table below. 

NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $81,000,000 

Total Apportioned ........ 81,000,000 

Table 21 shows the FY 2007 New 

Freedom apportionments. 

2. Basis for Formula Apportionment 

By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of 

funds available to UZAs with 

populations of 200,000 or more persons 

(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for 

urbanized areas with populations 

ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons 

(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the 

States for rural and small urban areas 

with populations of less than 50,000 

persons. FTA apportions funds based 

upon the number of persons with 

disabilities over the age of five residing 

in a State or large urbanized area, using 

data from the 2000 Census. FTA 

publishes apportionments to each State 

for small UZAs and for rural and small 

urban areas and a single apportionment 

for each large UZA. 

FTA has learned from the U.S. Bureau 

of the Census that there is a better 

source of disability data from the 2000 

Census than the 2000 census file we had 

previously used for SAFETEA–LU 

projections and for the FY 2006 New 

Freedom program apportionments. We 

have therefore based the FY 2007 

apportionments for the New Freedom 

program on the information for States 

and urbanized areas contained in the 

Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF–3)—

Sample Data (tables QT–P21 and P42), 

and Census publication PHC–2, which 

provides more accurate data for 

individuals with disabilities than the 

file based on projections from a sample 

that we had previously used. We will 

also base future apportionments on this 

data and will update the SAFETEA–LU 

estimates for FY 2008–2009 on the Web 

site. We regret any inconvenience this 

technical change in the source data for 

the formula may cause areas in their 

planning and selection of New Freedom 

projects. 

The Designated Recipient, either for 

the State or for a large UZA, is 

responsible for further allocating the 

funds to specific projects and 

subrecipients through a competitive 

selection process. If the Governor has 

designated more than one recipient of 

JARC funds in a large UZA, the 

Designated Recipients may agree to 

conduct a single competitive selection 

process or sub-allocate funds to each 

Designated Recipient, based upon a 

percentage split agreed upon locally and 

conduct separate competitions. 

3. Requirements 

States and Designated Recipients 

must solicit grant applications and 

select projects competitively, based on 

application procedures and 

requirements established by the 

Designated Recipient, consistent with 

the Federal New Freedom program 

objectives. In the case of large UZAs, the 

area-wide solicitation shall be 

conducted in cooperation with the 

appropriate MPO(s). 

Funds are available to support the 

capital and operating costs of new 

public transportation services and 

public transportation alternatives that 

are beyond those required by the 

Americans with Disabilities Act. Funds 

provided under other Federal programs 

(other than those of the DOT) may be 

used as match for capital funds 

provided under Section 5317, and 

revenue from contract services may be 

used as local match. 

Funding is available for transportation 

services provided by public, non-profit, 

or private-for-profit operators. 

Assistance may be provided for a variety 

of transportation services and strategies 

directed at assisting persons with 

disabilities address unmet 

transportation needs. Eligible public 

transportation services and alternatives 

to public transportation funded under 

the New Freedom program must be both 

new and beyond the ADA. (Note, 

however, that FTA has published 

interim guidance holding Designated 

Recipients harmless for project 

selections conducted in good faith based 

on FTA’s earlier preliminary 

determination that eligible services 

could be either new or beyond the 

ADA.) 

The Federal share is 80 percent of 

capital expenses and 50 percent of 

operating expenses. Funds provided 

under other Federal programs (other 

than those of the DOT) may be used for 

local/state match for funds provided 

under Section 5317, and revenue from 

service contracts may be used as local 

match. 

States and Designated Recipients may 

use up to ten percent of their annual 

apportionment to administer, plan, and 

provide technical assistance for a 

funded project. No local share is 

required for these program 

administrative funds. Funds used under 

this program for planning must be 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13887 

shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with 

responsibility for that area. 

The Designated Recipient must certify 

that: the projects selected were derived 

from a locally developed, coordinated 

public transit-human services 

transportation plan; and, the plan was 

developed through a process that 

included representatives of public, 

private, and nonprofit transportation 

and human services providers and 

participation by the public, including 

those representing the needs of welfare 

recipients and eligible low-income 

individuals. The locally developed, 

coordinated public transit-human 

services transportation planning process 

must be coordinated and consistent 

with the metropolitan and statewide 

planning processes, and funding for the 

program must be included in the 

metropolitan and statewide 

Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP 

and STIP) at a level of specificity or 

aggregation consistent with State and 

local policies and procedures. Finally, 

the State must certify that allocations of 

the grant to subrecipients are made on 

a fair and equitable basis. 

The coordinated planning 

requirement is also a requirement in two 

additional programs. Projects selected 

for funding under the Section 5310 

program and the JARC program are also 

required to be derived from a locally 

developed coordinated public transithuman service transportation plan. FTA 

anticipates that most areas will develop 

one consolidated plan for all the 

programs, which may include separate 

elements and other human service 

transportation programs. 

The New Freedom program is subject 

to the relevant requirements of Section 

5307, but certification of labor 

protections is not required. FTA 

published a proposed circular for this 

program and is currently reviewing 

comments submitted to the docket. The 

new circular will be posted on the FTA 

Web site at http://www.fta.dot.gov when 

it is issued. 

4. Period of Availability 

FTA is establishing a consistent threeyear period of availability for New 

Freedom, JARC, and the Section 5310 

program, which includes the year of 

apportionment plus two additional 

years. FY 2007 funding is available 

through FY 2009. Any funding that 

remains unobligated on September 30, 

2009 will revert to FTA for 

reapportionment among the States and 

large UZAs under the New Freedom 

program. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

a. Designated Recipient. Beginning in 

FY 2007, FTA must have received 

formal notification from the Governor or 

Governor’s designee of the Designated 

Recipient for New Freedom funds 

apportioned to a State or large UZA 

before awarding a grant to that area for 

New Freedom projects. 

b. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311. 

States may transfer New Freedom funds 

to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but 

only for projects competitively selected 

under the New Freedom program, not as 

a general supplement for those 

programs. FTA anticipates that the 

States would use this flexibility for 

projects to be implemented by a Section 

5307 recipient in a small urbanized area 

or for Federally recognized Indian 

Tribes that elect to receive funds as a 

direct recipient from FTA under Section 

5311. FTA has established a new scope 

code (647) to track New Freedom 

projects included within a Section 5307 

or 5311 grant. Transfer to Section 5307 

or 5311 is permitted but not required. 

FTA will also award stand-alone 

Section 5317 grants to the State for any 

and all subrecipients. In order to track 

disbursements accurately against the 

appropriate program, FTA will not 

combine New Freedom funds with 

Section 5307 funds in a single Section 

5307 grant, nor will FTA combine New 

Freedom with JARC funds in a single 

Section 5307 grant. 

c. Performance Measures. To support 

the evaluation of the program and 

Departmental reporting under the 

Governmental Performance and Results 

Act and the Office of Management and 

Budget’s Performance Assessment and 

Rating Tool, FTA has incorporated 

reporting for performance measures into 

the annual progress report all New 

Freedom grantees submit in TEAM. 

O. Alternative Transportation in Parks 

and Public Land (49 U.S.C. 5320) 

The Alternative Transportation in 

Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL) 

program is administered by FTA in 

partnership with the Department of the 

Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Department 

of Agriculture’s Forest Service. The 

purpose of the program is to enhance 

the protection of national parks and 

Federal lands, and increase the 

enjoyment of those visiting them. The 

program funds capital and planning 

expenses for alternative transportation 

systems such as buses and trams in 

federally managed parks and public 

lands. Federal land management 

agencies and State, tribal and local 

governments acting with the consent of 

a Federal land management agency are 

eligible to apply. DOI, after consultation 

with and in cooperation with FTA, 

determines the final selection and 

funding of projects. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, makes $23 million 

available for the program in FY 2007. 

Ten percent of the funds are reserved for 

administration and technical assistance. 

FTA published a Notice of Funding 

Availability (NOFA) in the Federal 

Register on December 5, 2006, inviting 

applications for projects to be funded in 

FY 2007. Applications were due to the 

appropriate Federal Land Management 

Agency on February 16, 2007. 

2. Program Requirements 

Projects are competitively selected 

based on criteria specified in the Notice 

of Funding Availability. The terms and 

conditions applicable to the program are 

also specified in the NOFA. Projects 

must conserve natural, historical, and 

cultural resources, reduce congestion 

and pollution, and improve visitor 

mobility and accessibility. No more than 

25 percent may be allocated for any one 

project. 

3. Period of Availability 

The funds under the Alternative 

Transportation in Parks and Public 

Lands remain available until expended. 

4. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

Project selections for the FY 2006 

funding were published in the Federal 

Register on September 12, 2006. Fifteen 

projects were awarded through direct 

grants to individual State and local 

governments. Twenty-seven projects 

were funded through reimbursable 

interagency agreements with the U.S. 

Forest Service, National Park Service, 

and Fish and Wildlife Service. Twentyfive of the projects (totaling $16 million) 

were capital projects and seventeen 

(totaling $3.6 million) were planning 

projects. 

P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 

U.S.C. 5339) 

The Alternatives Analysis Program 

provides grants to States, authorities of 

the States, metropolitan planning 

organizations, and local government 

authorities to develop studies as part of 

the transportation planning process. 

These studies include an assessment of 

a wide range of public transportation 

alternatives designed to address a 

transportation problem in a corridor or 

subarea; sufficient information to enable 

the Secretary to make the findings of 

project justification and local financial 

commitment required; the selection of a 

locally preferred alternative; and the 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13888 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

adoption of the locally preferred 

alternative as part of the state or 

regional long-range transportation plan. 

For more information about this 

program contact Sean Libberton, Office 

of Planning and Environment, at (202) 

366–4033. 

1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $25,000,000 

to the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 

U.S.C. 5339). The Act made available 

$18,900,000 for discretionary allocation 

to the projects designated in SAFETEA–

LU. The balance of $6,100,000 will be 

made available for competitive 

allocation. 

ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM

Total Appropriation ......... $25,000,000 

Funds Allocated to 

SAFETEA–LU Earmarks .......................... 6,100,000 

Funds Available for Discretionary/Competitive 

Allocation ..................... 18,900,000 

Allocations to projects designated in 

SAFETEA–LU are displayed in Table 

22. 

2. Basis for Allocation of Funds 

Section 3037(c) of SAFETEA–LU 

included 18 projects to be funded 

through Alternatives Analysis Program 

in FYs 2006 and 2007. Table 22 displays 

the amounts available in FY 2007 to the 

Alternatives Analysis projects 

designated in SAFETEA–LU. In a 

separate part of today’s Federal 

Register, FTA is publishing a Notice of 

Funding Availability to solicit 

applications for alternatives analysis 

projects that advance the state of the art 

for the balance of FY 2007 funds and the 

carryover funds available for 

competitive allocation from FY 2006. 

3. Requirements 

Alternatives Analysis program funds 

may be made available to States, 

authorities of the States, metropolitan 

planning organizations, and local 

governmental authorities. The 

Government’s share of the cost of an 

activity funded may not exceed 80 

percent of the cost of the activity. The 

funds will be awarded as separate 

Section 5339 grants. The grant 

requirements will be comparable to 

those for Section 5309 grants. Eligible 

projects include planning and corridor 

studies and the adoption of locally 

preferred alternatives within the fiscally 

constrained Metropolitan 

Transportation Plan for that area. Funds 

awarded under the Alternatives 

Analysis Program must be shown in the 

UPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility 

for that area. Pre-award authority 

applies to these funds after Congress 

appropriates funds for these projects 

and the allocations are published in an 

FTA notice of apportionments and 

allocations. 

Legislation to amend the earmark is 

necessary should a recipient wish to use 

funds provided under Section 5339 for 

eligible project activities outside the 

scope of the project description. 

Unless otherwise specified in law, 

grants made under the Alternatives 

Analysis program must meet all other 

eligibility requirements as outlined in 

Section 5309. 

4. Period of availability 

Funds designated for specific 

Alternatives Analysis Program projects 

remain available for obligation for three 

fiscal years, which includes the year of 

appropriation plus two additional fiscal 

years. The FY 2007 funding for projects 

included in this notice remains 

available through September 30, 2009. 

Alternatives Analysis funds not 

obligated in an FTA grant for their 

original purpose at the end of the period 

of availability will generally be made 

available for other projects. 

5. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

Table 23 lists prior year carryover of 

$19,305,000 for Alternative Analysis 

projects made available in FY 2006. 

Q. Growing States and High Density 

States Formula Factors 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, makes $404,000,000 

available for apportionment in 

accordance with the formula factors 

prescribed for Growing States and High 

Density States in Section 5340 of 

SAFETEA–LU. Fifty percent of this 

amount (or $202,000,000) will be 

allotted eligible States and urbanized 

areas using the Growing State formula 

factors. The other 50 percent is 

apportioned to eligible States and 

urbanized areas using the High Density 

States formula factors. Based on 

application of the formulas, 

$138,734,486 of the Growing States 

funding was apportioned to urbanized 

areas and $63,265,514 to nonurbanized 

areas. All of the $202,000,000 allotted to 

High Density States is apportioned to 

urbanized areas. 

The term ‘‘State’’ is defined only to 

mean the 50 States. For the Growing 

State portion of Section 5340, funds are 

allocated based on the population 

forecasts for fifteen years after the date 

of that census. Forecasts are based on 

the trend between the most recent 

decennial census and Census Bureau 

population estimates for the most 

current year. Funds allocated to the 

States are then sub-allocated to 

urbanized and non-urbanized areas 

based on forecast population, where 

available. If forecasted population data 

at the urbanized level is not available, 

funds are allocated to current urbanized 

and non-urbanized areas on the basis of 

current population. Funds allocated to 

urbanized areas are included in their 

Section 5307apportionment. Funds 

allocated for non-urbanized areas are 

included in the states’ Section 5311 

apportionments. 

R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility 

Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 Note) 

The Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility 

(OTRB) Program authorizes FTA to 

make grants to operators of over-theroad buses to help finance the 

incremental capital and training costs of 

complying with the DOT over-the-road 

bus accessibility final rule, 49 CFR Part 

37, published on September 28, 1998 

(63 FR 51670). FTA conducts a national 

solicitation of applications, and grantees 

are selected on a competitive basis. For 

more information about the OTRB 

program contact Blenda Younger, Office 

of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 

1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 

The Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007, provides $7,600,000 

for the Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility 

(OTRB) Program, which is the total 

amount allocable for OTRB, as shown in 

the table below. 

Total Appropriation ......... $7,600,000 

Funds Available for Competitive Allocation ........ 7,600,000 

Of this amount, $5,700,000 is 

allocable to providers of intercity fixedroute service, and $1,900,000 to other 

providers of over-the-road bus services, 

including local fixed-route service, 

commuter service, and charter and tour 

service. 

2. Program Requirements 

Projects are competitively selected. 

The Federal share of the project is 90 

percent of net project cost. Program 

guidance is provided in the Federal 

Register notice soliciting applications. 

We will publish a notice in the near 

future for applications for applications 

for the FY 2007 funding made available 

under the Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution, 2007. Operators of over the 

road buses may apply through 

www.grants.gov, or by submitting an 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13889 

application to the appropriate FTA 

regional office. Assistance is available to 

operators of buses used substantially or 

exclusively in intercity, fixed route, 

over-the-road bus service. Capital 

projects eligible for funding include 

projects to add lifts and other 

accessibility components to new vehicle 

purchases and to purchase lifts to 

retrofit existing vehicles. Eligible 

training costs include developing 

training materials or providing training 

for local providers of over-the-road bus 

services. 

3. Period of Availability 

Funds are available until expended. 

4. Other Program or Apportionment 

Related Information and Highlights 

A Federal Register notice of FY 2006 

project selections was published 

December 4, 2007, and is available at 

http://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/leg_

reg_federal_register.html/. 

V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 

2007 Grants 

A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To 

Incur Project Costs 

1. Caution to New Grantees. While we 

provide pre-award authority for many 

projects, we do not recommend that 

first-time grant recipients utilize the 

automatic pre-award authority to incur 

expenses before the grant is actually 

awarded by FTA. As a new grantee, it 

is easy to misunderstand pre-award 

authority conditions and not be aware of 

all of the applicable FTA requirements 

that must be met in order to be 

reimbursed for project expenditures 

incurred in advance of grant award. 

FTA programs have specific statutory 

requirements that are often different 

from those for other Federal grant 

programs with which new grantees may 

be familiar. If funds are expended for an 

ineligible project or activity, FTA will 

be unable to reimburse the project 

sponsor. 

2. Policy. FTA provides blanket, or 

automatic, pre-award authority in 

certain program areas described below. 

This pre-award authority allows 

grantees to incur certain project costs 

prior to grant approval and retain their 

eligibility for subsequent reimbursement 

after grant approval. The grantee 

assumes all risk and is responsible for 

ensuring that all conditions are met to 

retain eligibility. This automatic preaward spending authority permits a 

grantee to incur costs on an eligible 

transit capital, operating, planning, or 

administrative project without prejudice 

to possible future Federal participation 

in the cost of the project or. In the 

Federal Register Notice of November 

30, 2006, FTA extended pre-award 

authority for capital assistance under all 

formula programs through FY 2009, the 

duration of SAFETEA–LU. FTA 

provides pre-award authority for 

planning and operating assistance under 

the formula programs without regard to 

the period of the authorization. In 

addition, we extend pre-award authority 

for certain discretionary programs based 

on the annual Appropriations Act each 

year. All pre-award authority is subject 

to conditions and triggers stated below: 

a. FTA does not impose additional 

conditions on pre-award authority for 

operating, planning, or administrative 

assistance under the formula grant 

programs. Grantees may be reimbursed 

for expenses incurred prior to grant 

award so long as funds have been 

expended in accordance with all 

Federal requirements. In addition to 

cross-cutting Federal grant 

requirements, program specific 

requirements must be met. For example, 

a planning project must have been 

included in a UPWP; a New Freedom 

operating assistance project or a JARC 

planning or operating project must have 

been derived from a coordinated plan 

and competitively selected by the 

Designated Recipient prior to incurring 

expenses; expenditure on State 

Administration expenses under State 

Administered programs must be 

consistent with the State Management 

Plan. Designated Recipients for JARC 

and New Freedom have pre-award 

authority for the ten percent of the 

apportionment they may use for 

program administration. 

b. Pre-Award authority for 

Alternatives Analysis planning projects 

designated in 49 U.S.C. 5339, as 

amended by SAFETEA–LU, is triggered 

by the publication of the allocation in 

FTA’s Federal Register Notice of 

Apportionments and Allocations 

following the annual Appropriations 

Act and must be included in the UPWP 

of the MPO for that metropolitan area. 

c. Pre-award authority for design and 

environmental work on a capital project 

is triggered by the authorization of 

formula funds, or the appropriation of 

funds for a discretionary project and 

publication of the project in FTA’s 

annual Federal Register Notice of 

apportionments and allocations. 

d. Following authorization of formula 

funds or appropriation and publication 

of discretionary projects, pre-award 

authority for capital project 

implementation activities including 

property acquisition, demolition, 

construction, and acquisition of 

vehicles, equipment, or construction 

materials is triggered by completion of 

the environmental review process with 

FTA’s concurrence in the categorical 

exclusion (CE) determination or signing 

of an environmental Record of Decision 

(ROD) or Finding of No Significant 

Impact (FONSI). Prior to exercising preaward authority, grantees must comply 

with the conditions and Federal 

requirements outlined in paragraph 3 

below. Failure to do so will render an 

otherwise eligible project ineligible for 

FTA financial assistance. Capital 

projects under the Section 5310, JARC, 

and New Freedom programs must 

comply with specific program 

requirements, including coordinated 

planning and competitive selection. In 

addition, prior to incurring costs, 

grantees are strongly encouraged to 

consult with the appropriate FTA 

regional office regarding the eligibility 

of the project for future FTA funds and 

the applicability of the conditions and 

Federal requirements. 

e. Pre-award authority does not apply 

to the Section 5309 Capital Investment 

Bus and Bus-Related Facilities and 

Clean Fuels program high priority 

project designations or any other transit 

discretionary projects designated in 

SAFETEA–LU until funds have been 

appropriated and the allocations 

published in the annual Federal 

Register Notice. Thus pre-award 

authority is extended now only for FY 

2006 and FY 2007 project funding. For 

such Section 5309 Capital Investment 

Bus and Bus-Related, Clean Fuels 

Program, or other transit capital 

discretionary projects, the date that 

costs may be incurred is: (1) For design 

and environmental review, the date that 

the appropriation bill which funds the 

project was enacted; and (2) for property 

acquisition, demolition, construction, 

and acquisition of vehicles, equipment, 

or construction materials, the date that 

FTA approves the document (ROD, 

FONSI, or CE determination) that 

completes the environmental review 

process required by the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and 

its implementing regulations. FTA 

introduced this new trigger for preaward authority in FY 2006 in 

recognition of the growing prevalence of 

new grantees unfamiliar with Federal 

and FTA requirements to ensure FTA’s 

continued ability to comply with NEPA 

and related environmental laws. 

Because FTA does not sign a final NEPA 

document until MPO and statewide 

planning requirements (including air 

quality conformity requirements, if 

applicable) have been satisfied, this new 

trigger for pre-award will ensure 

compliance with both planning and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13890 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

environmental requirements prior to 

irreversible action by the grantee. 

f. In previous notices FTA extended 

pre-award authority to Section 330 

projects and those surface transportation 

projects commonly referred to as 

Section 115 projects administered by 

FTA, for which amounts were provided 

in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 

2004 and Section 117 projects in the 

2005 Appropriations Act administered 

by FTA. Pre-award authority is now 

extended to transit projects in Section 

112 of the 2006 Appropriations Act that 

are to be administered by FTA. The 

same conditions described for bus 

projects apply to these projects. We 

strongly encourage any prospective 

applicant that does not have a previous 

relationship with FTA to review Federal 

grant requirements with the FTA 

regional office before incurring costs. 

g. Blanket pre-award authority does 

not apply to Section 5309 Capital 

Investment New Starts funds. Specific 

instances of pre-award authority for 

Capital Investment New Starts projects 

are described in paragraph 4 below. Preaward authority does not apply to 

Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related 

or Clean Fuels projects authorized for 

funding beyond this fiscal year. Before 

an applicant may incur costs for Capital 

Investment New Starts projects, Bus and 

Bus-Related projects, or any other 

projects not yet published in a notice of 

apportionments and allocations, it must 

first obtain a written Letter of No 

Prejudice (LONP) from FTA. To obtain 

an LONP, a grantee must submit a 

written request accompanied by 

adequate information and justification 

to the appropriate FTA regional office, 

as described below. 

3. Conditions. The conditions under 

which pre-award authority may be 

utilized are specified below: 

a. Pre-award authority is not a legal or 

implied commitment that the subject 

project will be approved for FTA 

assistance or that FTA will obligate 

Federal funds. Furthermore, it is not a 

legal or implied commitment that all 

items undertaken by the applicant will 

be eligible for inclusion in the project. 

b. All FTA statutory, procedural, and 

contractual requirements must be met. 

c. No action will be taken by the 

grantee that prejudices the legal and 

administrative findings that the Federal 

Transit Administrator must make in 

order to approve a project. 

d. Local funds expended by the 

grantee pursuant to and after the date of 

the pre-award authority will be eligible 

for credit toward local match or 

reimbursement if FTA later makes a 

grant or grant amendment for the 

project. Local funds expended by the 

grantee prior to the date of the preaward authority will not be eligible for 

credit toward local match or 

reimbursement. Furthermore, the 

expenditure of local funds on activities 

such as land acquisition, demolition, or 

construction prior to the date of preaward authority for those activities (i.e., 

the completion of the NEPA process) 

would compromise FTA’s ability to 

comply with Federal environmental 

laws and may render the project 

ineligible for FTA funding. 

e. The Federal amount of any future 

FTA assistance awarded to the grantee 

for the project will be determined on the 

basis of the overall scope of activities 

and the prevailing statutory provisions 

with respect to the Federal/local match 

ratio at the time the funds are obligated. 

f. For funds to which the pre-award 

authority applies, the authority expires 

with the lapsing of the fiscal year funds. 

g. When a grant for the project is 

subsequently awarded, the Financial 

Status Report, in TEAM-Web, must 

indicate the use of pre-award authority. 

h. Environmental, Planning, and 

Other Federal Requirements. 

All Federal grant requirements must 

be met at the appropriate time for the 

project to remain eligible for Federal 

funding. The growth of the Federal 

transit program has resulted in a 

growing number of inexperienced 

grantees who make compliance with 

Federal planning and environmental 

laws increasingly challenging. FTA has 

therefore modified its approach to preaward authority to use the completion 

of the NEPA process, which has as a 

prerequisite the completion of planning 

and air quality requirements, as the 

trigger for pre-award authority for all 

activities except design and 

environmental review. 

i. The requirement that a project be 

included in a locally adopted 

metropolitan transportation plan, the 

metropolitan transportation 

improvement program and Federallyapproved statewide transportation 

improvement program (23 CFR Part 450) 

must be satisfied before the grantee may 

advance the project beyond planning 

and preliminary design with nonFederal funds under pre-award 

authority. If the project is located within 

an EPA-designated nonattainment area 

for air quality, the conformity 

requirements of the Clean Air Act, 40 

CFR Part 93, must also be met before the 

project may be advanced into 

implementation-related activities under 

pre-award authority. Compliance with 

NEPA and other environmental laws 

and executive orders (e.g., protection of 

parklands, wetlands, and historic 

properties) must be completed before 

State or local funds are spent on 

implementation activities, such as site 

preparation, construction, and 

acquisition, for a project that is expected 

to be subsequently funded with FTA 

funds. The grantee may not advance the 

project beyond planning and 

preliminary design before FTA has 

determined the project to be a 

categorical exclusion, or has issued a 

finding of no significant impact (FONSI) 

or an environmental record of decision 

(ROD), in accordance with FTA 

environmental regulations, 23 CFR Part 

771. For planning projects, the project 

must be included in a locally-approved 

Planning Work Program that has been 

coordinated with the State. 

j. In addition, Federal procurement 

procedures, as well as the whole range 

of applicable Federal requirements (e.g., 

Buy America, Davis-Bacon Act, 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise) 

must be followed for projects in which 

Federal funding will be sought in the 

future. Failure to follow any such 

requirements could make the project 

ineligible for Federal funding. In short, 

this increased administrative flexibility 

requires a grantee to make certain that 

no Federal requirements are 

circumvented through the use of preaward authority. If a grantee has 

questions or concerns regarding the 

environmental requirements, or any 

other Federal requirements that must be 

met before incurring costs, it should 

contact the appropriate regional office. 

4. Pre-Award Authority for New Starts 

Projects. 

a. Preliminary Engineering (PE) and 

Final Design (FD). Projects proposed for 

Section 5309 New Starts funds are 

required to follow a Federally defined 

New Starts project development 

process. This New Starts process 

includes, among other things, FTA 

approval of the entry of the project into 

PE and into FD. In accordance with 

Section 5309(d), FTA considers the 

merits of the project, the strength of its 

financial plan, and its readiness to enter 

the next phase in deciding whether or 

not to approve entry into PE or FD. 

Upon FTA approval to enter PE, FTA 

extends pre-award authority to incur 

costs for PE activities. Upon FTA 

approval to enter FD, FTA extends preaward authority to incur costs for FD 

activities. The pre-award authority for 

each phase is automatic upon FTA’s 

signing of a letter to the project sponsor 

approving entry into that phase. PE and 

FD are defined in the New Starts 

regulation entitled Major Capital 

Investment Projects, found at 49 CFR 

Part 611. 

b. Real Property Acquisition 

Activities. FTA extends automatic preVerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13891 

award authority for the acquisition of 

real property and real property rights for 

a New Starts project upon completion of 

the NEPA process for that project. The 

NEPA process is completed when FTA 

signs an environmental Record of 

Decision (ROD) or Finding of No 

Significant Impact (FONSI), or makes a 

Categorical Exclusion (CE) 

determination. With the limitations and 

caveats described below, real estate 

acquisition for a New Starts project may 

commence, at the project sponsor’s risk, 

upon completion of the NEPA process. 

For FTA-assisted projects, any 

acquisition of real property or real 

property rights must be conducted in 

accordance with the requirements of the 

Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 

Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA) 

and its implementing regulations, 49 

CFR Part 24. This pre-award authority is 

strictly limited to costs incurred: (i) to 

acquire real property and real property 

rights in accordance with the URA 

regulation, and (ii) to provide relocation 

assistance in accordance with the URA 

regulation. This pre-award authority is 

limited to the acquisition of real 

property and real property rights that 

are explicitly identified in the final 

environmental impact statement (FEIS), 

environmental assessment (EA), or CE 

document, as needed for the selected 

alternative that is the subject of the 

FTA-signed ROD or FONSI, or CE 

determination. This pre-award authority 

does not cover site preparation, 

demolition, or any other activity that is 

not strictly necessary to comply with 

the URA, with one exception. That 

exception is when a building that has 

been acquired, has been emptied of its 

occupants, and awaits demolition poses 

a potential fire-safety hazard or other 

hazard to the community in which it is 

located, or is susceptible to 

reoccupation by vagrants, demolition of 

the building is also covered by this preaward authority upon FTA’s written 

agreement that the adverse condition 

exists. 

Pre-award authority for property 

acquisition is also provided when FTA 

makes a CE determination for a 

protective buy or hardship acquisition 

in accordance with 23 CFR 

771.117(d)(12), and when FTA makes a 

CE determination for the acquisition of 

a pre-existing railroad right-of-way in 

accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(c). 

When a tiered environmental review in 

accordance with 23 CFR 771.111(g) is 

being used, pre-award authority is NOT 

provided upon completion of the firsttier environmental document except 

when the Tier-1 ROD or FONSI signed 

by FTA explicitly provides such preaward authority for a particular 

identified acquisition. 

FTA’s rationale for providing this preaward authority was described in the FY 

2003 Apportionments and Allocations 

Notice published in the Federal 

Register on March 12, 2003 (68 FR 1106 

et seq.). The FY 2003 Notice may be 

found on the FTA Web site at http:// 

www.fta.dot.gov/library/legal/ 

federalregister/2003/fr31203.pdf. Project 

sponsors should use pre-award 

authority for real property acquisition 

and relocation assistance very carefully, 

with a clear understanding that it does 

not constitute a funding commitment by 

FTA. 

c. National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) Activities. NEPA requires that 

major projects proposed for FTA 

funding assistance be subjected to a 

public and interagency review of the 

need for the project, its environmental 

and community impacts, and 

alternatives to avoid and reduce adverse 

impacts. Projects of more limited scope 

also need a level of environmental 

review, either to support an FTA finding 

of no significant impact (FONSI) or to 

demonstrate that the action is 

categorically excluded from the more 

rigorous level of NEPA review. 

FTA’s regulation entitled 

Environmental Impact and Related 

Procedures at 23 CFR Part 771 states 

that the costs incurred by a grant 

applicant for the preparation of 

environmental documents requested by 

FTA are eligible for FTA financial 

assistance (23 CFR 771.105(e)). 

Accordingly, FTA extends automatic 

pre-award authority for costs incurred to 

comply with NEPA regulations and to 

conduct NEPA-related activities for a 

proposed New Starts project, effective as 

of the date of the Federal approval of the 

relevant STIP or STIP amendment that 

includes the project or any phase of the 

project. NEPA-related activities include, 

but are not limited to, public 

involvement activities, historic 

preservation reviews, section 4(f) 

evaluations, wetlands evaluations, 

endangered species consultations, and 

biological assessments. This pre-award 

authority is strictly limited to costs 

incurred to conduct the NEPA process, 

and to prepare environmental, historic 

preservation and related documents. It 

does not cover PE activities beyond 

those necessary for NEPA compliance. 

As with any pre-award authority, FTA 

reimbursement for costs incurred is not 

guaranteed. 

d. Other New Starts Activities 

Requiring Letter of No Prejudice (LONP). 

Except as discussed in paragraphs a) 

through c) above, a grant applicant must 

obtain a written LONP from FTA before 

incurring costs for any activity expected 

to be funded by New Start funds not yet 

granted. To obtain an LONP, an 

applicant must submit a written request 

accompanied by adequate information 

and justification to the appropriate FTA 

regional office, as described in B below. 

5. Pre-Award Authority for Small 

Starts. When FTA issues a Project 

Development approval letter for a Small 

Starts project, FTA grants pre-award 

authority for the design and preliminary 

engineering activities associated with 

project development. When FTA issues 

a Project Construction Grant Agreement 

(PCGA), FTA grants pre-award authority 

for the construction phase of the project. 

Pre-award authority for NEPA-related 

work on a Small Starts project is granted 

under the same conditions and for the 

same reasons as New Starts projects, 

described in paragraph 4.c above. Preaward authority for real property 

acquisition activities for a Small Starts 

project is granted under the same 

conditions and for the same reasons as 

New Starts projects, describe in 

paragraph 4.b above. 

B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy 

1. Policy 

LONP authority allows an applicant 

to incur costs on a project utilizing nonFederal resources, with the 

understanding that the costs incurred 

subsequent to the issuance of the LONP 

may be reimbursable as eligible 

expenses or eligible for credit toward 

the local match should FTA approve the 

project at a later date. LONPs are 

applicable to projects and project 

activities not covered by automatic preaward authority. The majority of LONPs 

will be for Section 5309 New Starts 

funds not covered under a full funding 

grant agreement, or for Section 5309 Bus 

and Bus-Related funds not yet 

appropriated by Congress. At the end of 

an authorization period, LONPs may be 

issued for formula funds beyond the life 

of the current authorization or FTA’s 

extension of automatic pre-award 

authority. 

2. Conditions and Federal Requirements 

The conditions for pre-award 

authority specified in section VIII A2 

above apply to all LONPs. The 

Environmental, Planning and Other 

Federal Requirements described in 

section V.A.3, also apply to all LONPs. 

Because project implementation 

activities may not be initiated prior to 

NEPA completion, FTA will normally 

not issue an LONP for such activities 

until the NEPA process has been 

completed with a ROD, FONSI, or 

Categorical Exclusion determination. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13892 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

3. Request for LONP 

Before incurring costs for a project not 

covered by automatic pre-award 

authority, the project sponsor must first 

submit a written request for an LONP, 

accompanied by adequate information 

and justification, to the appropriate 

regional office and obtain written 

approval. As a prerequisite to FTA 

approval of an LONP for a New Starts 

project, FTA will require project 

sponsors to demonstrate project 

worthiness and readiness that establish 

the project as a candidate for an FFGA. 

Projects will be assessed based upon the 

criteria considered in the New Start 

evaluation process. Specifically, upon 

the request for an LONP, the applicant 

shall provide sufficient information to 

allow FTA to consider the following 

items: 

a. Description of the activities to be 

covered by the LONP. 

b. Justification for advancing the 

identified activities. 

c. Data that indicates that the project 

will maintain its ability to receive a 

rating of ‘‘medium’’, or better and that 

its cost-effectiveness rating will be 

‘‘medium’’ or better, unless such project 

has been specifically exempt from such 

a requirement. 

d. Allocated level of risk and 

contingency for the activity requested. 

e. Status of procurement progress, 

including, if appropriate, submittal of 

bids for the activities covered by the 

LONP. 

f. Strength of the capital and operating 

financial plan for the New Starts project 

and the future transit system. 

g. Adequacy of the Project 

Management Plan. 

h. Resolution of any readiness issues 

that would affect the project, such as 

land acquisition and technical capacity 

to carry out the project. 

C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of 

Certifications and Assurances 

The full text of the FY 2007 

Certifications and Assurances was 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 7, 2006, and is available on 

the FTA Web site and in TEAM-Web. 

The FY 2007 Certifications and 

Assurances must be used for all grants 

made in FY 2007, including obligation 

of carryover. All grantees with active 

grants were required to have signed the 

FY 2007 Certifications and Assurances 

within 90 days after publication. Any 

questions regarding this document may 

be addressed to the appropriate 

Regional Office or to Pat Simpich, in the 

FTA Office of Program Management, at 

(202) 366–1662. 

D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit 

Purposes 

SAFETEA–LU continues provisions 

in the Intermodal Surface 

Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

(ISTEA) and TEA–21 that expanded 

modal choice in transportation funding 

by including substantial flexibility to 

transfer funds between FTA and FHWA 

formula program funding categories. In 

addition SAFETEA–LU included a 

provision allowing for transfer of certain 

discretionary program funds for 

administration of highway projects by 

FHWA and transit projects by FTA. FTA 

and FHWA execute Flex Funding 

Transfers between the Formula and Bus 

Grants Transit programs and the Federal 

Aid Highway programs. This has also 

included the transfer of State planning 

set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to 

be combined with metropolitan and 

statewide planning resources as 

Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG). 

These transfers are based on States 

requests to transfer funding from the 

Highway and/or Transit programs to 

fund States and local project priorities, 

and joint planning needs. This practice 

can result in transfers to the Federal 

Transit Program from the Federal Aid 

Highway Program or vice versa. 

1. Transfer Process for funds 

SAFETEA–LU was enacted in August, 

2005. With the enactment of SAFETEA–

LU, beginning in FY2006, mass transit 

programs are funded solely from general 

funds or trust funds. The transit formula 

and bus grant programs are now funded 

from the Mass Transit Account of the 

Highway Trust Fund. The Formula and 

Bus Grant Programs receive flex funding 

transfers from the Federal Aid Highway 

Program. 

As a result of the changes to program 

funding mechanisms, there is no longer 

a requirement to transfer budget 

authority and liquidating cash resources 

simultaneously upon the execution of a 

Flex Funding transfer request by a State. 

Since the transfers are between trust 

fund accounts, the only requirement is 

to transfer budget authority (obligation 

limitation) between the Federal Aid 

Program trust fund account and the 

Federal Transit Formula and Bus Grant 

Program account. At the point in time 

that the obligation resulting from the 

transfer of budgetary authority is 

expended, a transfer of liquidating cash 

will be required. 

Beginning in FY 2007, the accounting 

process is changing for transfers of flex 

funds and other specific programs to 

allow budget authority to be transferred 

and the cash to be transferred 

separately. FTA is requiring that flexed 

fund transfers to FTA be in separate and 

identifiable grants in order to ensure 

that the draw-down of flexed funds can 

be tracked, thus securing the internal 

controls for monitoring these resources 

from the Federal Highway 

Administration to avoid deficiencies in 

FTA’s Formula and Bus Grants account. 

FTA will need to monitor the 

expenditures of flexed funded grants 

and request the transfer of liquidating 

cash from FHWA to ensure sufficient 

funds are available to meet 

expenditures. To facilitate tracking of 

grantees’ flex funding expenditures, 

FTA developed new codes to provide 

distinct identification of ‘‘flex funds.’’

The process for transferring flexible 

funds between FTA and FHWA 

programs is described below. Note that 

the new transfer process for ‘‘flex 

funds’’ beginning in FY 2007 does not 

apply to the transfer of State planning 

set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to 

be combined with metropolitan and 

statewide planning resources as 

Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG). 

These transfers are based on States 

requests to transfer funding from the 

Highway and/or Transit programs to 

fund States and local project priorities, 

and joint planning needs. Planning 

funds transferred will be allowed to be 

merged in a single grant with FTA 

planning resources using the same 

process implemented in FY 2006. For 

information on the process for the 

transfer of funds between FTA and 

FHWA planning programs refer to 

section IV.A and B. 

Note also that certain prior year 

appropriations earmarks (Sections 330, 

115, 117, and 112) are allotted annually 

for administration rather than being 

transferred. For information regarding 

these procedures, please contact Kristen 

D. Clarke, FTA Budget Office, at (202) 

366–1686; or Elissa Konove, FHWA 

Budget Division, at (202) 366–2845. 

a. Transfer from FHWA to FTA. 

FHWA funds designated for use in 

transit capital projects must be derived 

from the metropolitan and statewide 

planning and programming process, and 

must be included in an approved STIP 

before the funds can be transferred. By 

letter, the State DOT requests the FHWA 

Division Office to transfer highway 

funds for a transit project. The letter 

should specify the project, amount to be 

transferred, apportionment year, State, 

urbanized area, Federal aid 

apportionment category (i.e., Surface 

Transportation Program (STP), 

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality 

(CMAQ) or identification of the earmark 

and indication of the intended FTA 

formula program (i.e., Section 5307, 

5311 or 5310) and should include a 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13893 

description of the project as contained 

in the STIP. Note that FTA may also 

administer certain transfers of statutory 

earmarks under the Section 5309 bus 

program, for tracking purposes. 

The FHWA Division Office confirms 

that the apportionment amount is 

available for transfer and concurs in the 

transfer, by letter to the State DOT and 

FTA. The FHWA Office of Budget and 

Finance then transfers obligation 

authority and an equal amount of cash 

to FTA. All FHWA CMAQ and STP 

funds transferred to FTA will be 

transferred to one of the three FTA 

formula programs (i.e. Urbanized Area 

Formula (Section 5307), Nonurbanized 

Area Formula (Section 5311) or Elderly 

and Persons with Disabilities (Section 

5310). High Priority projects in 

SAFETEA–LU Section 1702 or 

Transportation Improvement projects in 

SAFETEA–LU Section 1934 and other 

Congressional earmarks when necessary 

that are transferred to FTA will be 

aligned and administered through FTA’s 

discretionary Bus Program (Section 

5309). 

The FTA grantee’s application for the 

project must specify which program the 

funds will be used for, and the 

application must be prepared in 

accordance with the requirements and 

procedures governing that program. 

Upon review and approval of the 

grantee’s application, FTA obligates 

funds for the project. 

Transferred funds are treated as FTA 

formula or discretionary funds, but are 

assigned a distinct identifying code for 

tracking purposes. The funds may be 

transferred for any capital purpose 

eligible under the FTA formula program 

to which they are transferred and, in the 

case of CMAQ, for certain operating 

costs. FHWA issued revised interim 

guidance on project eligibility under the 

CMAQ program in a Notice at 71 FR 

76038 et seq. (December 19, 2006) 

incorporating changes made by 

SAFETEA–LU. In accordance with 23 

U.S.C. 104(k), all FTA requirements 

except local share are applicable to 

transferred funds. Earmarks that are 

transferred to the Section 5309 Bus 

Program for administration, however, 

can be used for the Congressionally 

designated transit purpose and are not 

limited to eligibility under the Bus 

Program. 

In the event that transferred formula 

funds are not obligated for the intended 

purpose within the period of availability 

of the formula program to which they 

were transferred, they become available 

to the Governor for any eligible capital 

transit project. 

b. Transfers from FTA to FHWA. The 

MPO submits a written request to the 

FTA regional office for a transfer of FTA 

Section 5307 formula funds 

(apportioned to a UZA 200,000 and over 

in population) to FHWA based on 

approved use of the funds for highway 

purposes, as contained in the 

Governor’s approved State 

Transportation Improvement Program. 

The MPO must certify that: (1) The 

funds are not needed for capital 

investments required by the Americans 

with Disabilities Act; (2) notice and 

opportunity for comment and appeal 

has been provided to affected transit 

providers; and (3) local funds used for 

non-Federal match are eligible to 

provide assistance for either highway or 

transit projects. The FTA Regional 

Administrator reviews and concurs in 

the request, then forwards the approval 

in written format to FTA Headquarters, 

where a reduction equal to the dollar 

amount being transferred to FHWA is 

made to the grantee’s Urbanized Area 

Formula Program apportionment. 

Transfers of discretionary earmarks 

for administration by FHWA are 

handled on a case by case basis, by the 

FTA regional office, in consultation 

with the FTA Office of Program 

Management and Office of Budget and 

Policy. 

c. Matching Share for FHWA 

Transfers. The provisions of Title 23 

U.S.C. regarding the non-Federal share 

apply to Title 23 funds used for transit 

projects. Thus, FHWA funds transferred 

to FTA retain the same matching share 

that the funds would have if used for 

highway purposes and administered by 

FHWA. 

There are three instances in which a 

Federal share higher than 80 percent 

would be permitted. First, in States with 

large areas of Indian and certain public 

domain lands and national forests, parks 

and monuments, the local share for 

highway projects is determined by a 

sliding scale rate, calculated based on 

the percentage of public lands within 

that State. This sliding scale, which 

permits a greater Federal share, but not 

to exceed 95 percent, is applicable to 

transfers used to fund transit projects in 

these public land States. FHWA 

develops the sliding scale matching 

ratios for the increased Federal share. 

Second, commuter carpooling and 

vanpooling projects and transit safety 

projects using FHWA transfers 

administered by FTA may retain the 

same 100 percent Federal share that 

would be allowed for ride-sharing or 

safety projects administered by FHWA. 

The third instance is the 100 percent 

Federally-funded safety projects; 

however, these are subject to a 

nationwide 10 percent program 

limitation. 

d. Miscellaneous Transit Earmarks in 

FHWA Programs. The FY 2002 and FY 

2003 Appropriations Acts and 

accompanying reports included Section 

330, which identified a number of 

transit projects among projects 

designated to receive funding from 

certain FHWA funding sources. The FY 

2004 Appropriations Act similarly 

included transit projects among projects 

designated to receive funding from 

certain FHWA sources in Section 115, 

the FY 2005 Appropriations Act 

included a set of designations under 

Section 117, and the FY 2006 

Appropriations Act included 

designations under Section 112, which 

may include some projects that FHWA 

will identify to be administered by FTA. 

For those projects identified by FHWA 

as transit in nature, FHWA allots the 

funds to FTA to administer. The funds 

are available for the designated project 

until obligated and expended. Some of 

these FY 2002–2006 designations for 

transit projects have not yet been 

obligated. However, because these are 

FHWA funds, funds for projects 

unobligated at the end of the fiscal year 

are not automatically available as carry 

over made available in the following 

fiscal year. Instead FHWA re-allots 

obligation authority to FTA annually, 

after reconciling account balances. 

Because the requirements and 

procedures associated with these 

projects differ in some cases from those 

for the FTA programs that FTA grantees 

are familiar with, and the availability of 

funds for obligation by FTA depends on 

allotments from FHWA, transit 

applicants seeking funding under these 

miscellaneous FHWA designations must 

work closely with the appropriate FTA 

regional office and FHWA Division 

Office when applying for a grant under 

these designations. 

E. Grant Application Procedures 

1. Grantees must provide a Dun and 

Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal 

Numbering System (DUNS) number for 

inclusion in all applications for a 

Federal grant or cooperative agreement. 

The DUNS number should be entered 

into the grantee profile in TEAM-Web. 

Additional information about this and 

other Federal grant streamlining 

initiatives mandated by the Federal 

Financial Assistance Management 

Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–

107) can be accessed on OMB’s Web site 

at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ 

grants/reform.html. 

2. All applications for FTA funds 

should be submitted electronically to 

the appropriate FTA regional office 

through TEAM-Web, an Internetaccessible electronic grant application 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13894 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

system. FTA has provided limited 

exceptions to the requirement for 

electronic filing of applications. 

3. In FY 2007, FTA remains 

committed to processing applications 

promptly upon receipt of a completed 

application by the appropriate regional 

office. In order for an application to be 

considered complete and for FTA to 

assign a grant number, enabling 

submission in TEAM-Web, the 

following requirements must be met: 

a. The project is listed in a currently 

FTA approved Metropolitan 

Transportation Plan, Metropolitan 

Transportation Improvement Program 

(TIP); Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP), or 

Unified Planning Work Program 

(UPWP). 

b. All eligibility issues have been 

resolved. 

c. Required environmental findings 

have been made. 

d. The project budget’s Activity Line 

Items (ALI), scope, and project 

description meet FTA requirements. 

e. Local share funding source(s) have 

been identified. 

f. The grantee’s required Civil Rights 

submissions are current. 

g. Certifications and assurances are 

properly submitted. 

h. Funding is available, including any 

flexible funds included in the budget. 

i. For projects involving new 

construction (using at least $100 million 

in New Starts or formula funds), FTA 

engineering staff has reviewed the 

project management plan and given 

approval. 

j. When required for grants related to 

New Starts projects, PE and/or FD has 

been approved. 

k. Milestone information is complete, 

or FTA determines that milestone 

information can be finalized before the 

grant is ready for award. The grant must 

include sufficient milestones 

appropriate to the scale of the project to 

allow adequate oversight to monitor the 

progress of projects from the start 

through completion and closeout. 

4. Under most FTA programs, grants 

involving funding related to transit 

operations, must be submitted to the 

Department of Labor for certification of 

labor protective arrangements, prior to 

grant award. In addition, before FTA 

can award grants for discretionary 

projects and activities designated by 

Congress, notification must be given to 

members of Congress, and in the case of 

awards greater than $1 million, to the 

House and Senate authorizing and 

appropriations committees. 

Discretionary grants allocated by FTA 

also go through the Congressional 

notification process if they are greater 

than $1 million. 

5. Other important issues that impact 

FTA grant processing activities are 

discussed below. 

a. Change in Budget Structure. 

Because SAFETEA–LU restructured 

FTA’s accounts from all general funded 

accounts to one solely trust funded 

account and three general funded 

accounts, we are not able to mix funds 

from years prior to FY 2006 in the same 

grant with funds appropriated in FY 

2006 and beyond (except for New Starts 

and research grants). Previously all 

programs were funded approximately 80 

percent trust funds from the Mass 

Transit Account (MTA) of the Highway 

Trust Fund and 20 percent General 

Funds from the U.S. Treasury. The trust 

funds were transferred into the general 

funded accounts at the beginning of the 

year. Under SAFETEA–LU most 

programs are funded entirely from trust 

funds derived from the Mass Transit 

Account, while the New Starts and 

Research programs are funded with 

general funds. Carryover FY 2005 and 

prior funds currently available for 

obligation as well as FY 2006 and FY 

2007 funds may be included in an 

amendment to an existing grant for a 

New Starts or research project. 

For formula programs funded solely 

from trust funds beginning in FY 2006, 

grantees may not combine FY 2006 and 

FY 2007 funds in the same grant with 

FY 2005 and prior year funds. Grant 

amendments cannot be made to add FY 

2006 and later year funds to a grant that 

includes FY 2005 or prior funds. 

Obligations of FY 2005 and prior year 

carryover funds must be made in the 

original program accounts established 

under TEA–21 (either as an amendment 

to an existing grant or as a new grant) 

and cannot be combined with funds 

appropriated in FY 2006 or later. 

However, grantees are able to amend 

new grants established with FY 2006 or 

later year funds to add funds made 

available after FY 2006. We regret any 

inconvenience this accounting change 

may cause as we implement new 

statutory requirements under 

SAFETEA–LU. We encourage grantees 

to spend down and close out old grants 

as quickly as possible to minimize the 

inconvenience. 

b. Grant Budgets—SCOPE and ALI 

Codes. FTA uses the SCOPE and 

Activity Line Item (ALI) Codes in the 

grant budgets to track program trends, to 

report to Congress, and to respond to 

requests from the Inspector General and 

the Government Accountability Office 

(GAO), as well as to manage grants. The 

accuracy of the data is dependent on the 

careful and correct use of codes. We 

have revised the SCOPE and ALI table 

to include new codes for the newly 

eligible capital items, to better track 

certain expenditures, and to 

accommodate the new programs. We 

encourage grantees to review the table 

before selecting codes from the dropdown menus in TEAM-Web while 

creating a grant budget and to consult 

with the regional office in the correct 

use of codes. Additional information 

about how to use the SCOPE and ALI 

codes to accurately code budgets will be 

added to the resources available through 

TEAM-Web. 

c. Earmark and Discretionary Program 

Tracking. FTA has implemented new 

procedures in TEAM-Web for relating 

grants to earmarks or projects selected 

by FTA under discretionary programs. 

Each earmark or selected discretionary 

project published in the Federal 

Register will have a unique identifier 

associated with it. Tables of earmarks 

and selected discretionary projects have 

also been established in TEAM-Web. 

When applying for a grant using funding 

designated by Congress or FTA for a 

particular project, grantees are asked to 

identify the amount of funding 

associated with specific earmark or 

discretionary project used in the grant. 

Further instructions are posted on the 

TEAM-Web site and regional staff can 

provide additional assistance. 

d. New Freedom and JARC—

Administering Agency. The Governor 

must designate the state agency or 

agencies charged with administering the 

New Freedom and JARC formula 

programs and the recipient(s) 

designated to administer the program in 

each large urbanized area before FTA 

can award a grant to that State or large 

urbanized area. FTA will award grants 

for these programs only to the 

Designated Recipient for JARC or New 

Freedom, or, in the case of a large 

urbanized area, pursuant to a 

supplemental agreement with the 

Designated Recipient for JARC or New 

Freedom, to another entity that is the 

Designated Recipient for the Section 

5307 program. For Small Urbanized 

areas (under 200,000 population), the 

State Designated Recipient can transfer 

funds to the Section 5307 program for 

FTA to award direct grants to small 

urbanized area recipients. 

F. Payments 

Once a grant has been awarded and 

executed, requests for payment can be 

processed. To process payments FTA 

uses ECHO-Web, an Internet accessible 

system that provides grantees the 

capability to submit payment requests 

on-line, as well as receive user-IDs and 

passwords via e-mail. New applicants 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13895 

should contact the appropriate FTA 

regional office to obtain and submit the 

registration package necessary for set-up 

under ECHO-Web. 

G. Oversight 

FTA conducts periodic oversight 

reviews to assess grantee compliance 

with Federal requirements. Each UZA 

grantee is reviewed every three years (a 

Triennial Review). States are reviewed 

periodically for their management of the 

Section 5310 and 5311 programs. Other 

more detailed reviews are scheduled 

based on an annual grantee risk 

assessment, for example, reviews in the 

areas of Procurement, Financial 

Management, Safety and Civil Rights. 

FTA is developing appropriate oversight 

procedures for the new programs 

authorized by SAFETEA–LU. 

H. Technical Assistance 

FTA headquarters and regional staff 

will be pleased to answer your 

questions and provide any technical 

assistance you may need to apply for 

FTA program funds and manage the 

grants you receive. This notice and the 

program guidance circulars previously 

identified in this document may be 

accessed via the FTA Web site at 

http://www.fta.dot.gov. 

In addition, copies of the following 

circulars and other useful information 

are available on the FTA Web site and 

may be obtained from FTA regional 

offices: 4220.1E, Third Party Contracting 

Requirements, dated June 19, 2003; and 

C5010.1C, Grant Management 

Guidelines, dated October 1, 1998. The 

FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications 

and Assurances and Master Agreement 

are also posted on the FTA Web site. 

The DOT final rule on ‘‘Participation by 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in 

Department of Transportation Financial 

Assistance Programs,’’ which was 

effective July 16, 2003, can be found at 

http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/ 

waisidx_04/49cfr26_04.html/. 

Issued in Washington, DC, this 12th day of 

March, 2007. 

James S. Simpson, 

Administrator. 

Appendix A—FTA Regional Offices 

Richard H. Doyle, Regional 

Administrator, Region 1-Boston, 

Kendall Square, 55 Broadway, Suite 

920, Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, Tel. 

617 494–2055 

States served: Connecticut, Maine, 

Massachusetts, New Hampshire, 

Rhode Island, and Vermont 

Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Regional 

Administrator, Region 2-New York, 

One Bowling Green, Room 429, New 

York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. no. 212 

668–2170 

States served: New Jersey, New York 

Herman Shipman, Deputy Regional 

Administrator, Region 3-Philadelphia, 

1760 Market Street, Suite 500, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel. 

215 656–7100 

States served: Delaware, Maryland, 

Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, 

and District of Columbia 

Yvette Taylor, Regional Administrator, 

Region 4-Atlanta, Atlanta Federal 

Center, Suite 17T50, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW, Atlanta, GA 30303, Tel. 404 562–

3500 

States served: Alabama, Florida, 

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North 

Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, 

Tennessee, and Virgin Islands 

Robert C. Patrick, Regional 

Administrator, Region 6-Ft. Worth, 

819 Taylor Street, Room 8A36, Ft. 

Worth, TX 76102, Tel. 817 978–0550 

States served: Arkansas, Louisiana, 

Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas 

Mokhtee Ahmad, Regional 

Administrator, Region 7-Kansas City, 

MO, 901 Locust Street, Room 404, 

Kansas City, MO 64106, Tel. 816 329–

3920 

States served: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, 

and Nebraska 

Letitia Thompson, Acting Regional 

Administrator, Region 8-Denver, 

12300 West Dakota Ave., Suite 310, 

Lakewood, CO 80228–2583, Tel. 720–

963–3300 

States served: Colorado, Montana, North 

Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and 

Wyoming 

Leslie T. Rogers, Regional 

Administrator, Region 9-San 

Francisco, 201 Mission Street, Room 

2210, San Francisco, CA 94105–1926, 

Tel. 415 744–3133 

States served: American Samoa, 

Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, 

Nevada, and the Northern Mariana 

Islands 

Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator, 

Region 5-Chicago, 200 West Adams 

Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606, 

Tel. 312 353–2789 

States served: Illinois, Indiana, 

Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and 

Wisconsin 

Rick Krochalis, Regional Administrator, 

Region 10-Seattle, Jackson Federal 

Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite 

3142, Seattle, WA 98174–1002, Tel. 

206 220–7954 

States served: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, 

and Washington 

TABLE 1.—FY 2007 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS

FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS 

Section 5303 Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ $81,892,800 

Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... (409,464 ) 

Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 890,525 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 82,373,861 

Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 17,107,200 

Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... (85,536 ) 

Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 230,988 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 17,252,652 

Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3,606,175,000 

Less Oversight (three-fourths percent) .................................................................................................................................. (27,046,313 ) 

Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 4,957,616 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 3,584,086,303 

Section 5308 Clean Fuels Program ............................................................................................................................................ 1 18,721,000 

Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facility Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 881,779,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13896 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 1.—FY 2007 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS—Continued 

Less Oversight (one percent) ................................................................................................................................................. (8,817,790 ) 

Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ 872,961,210 

Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,448,000,000 

Less Oversight (one percent) ................................................................................................................................................. (14,480,000 ) 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 1,433,520,000 

Section 5310 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 117,000,000 

Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... (585,000 ) 

Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 244,554 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 116,659,554 

Section 5311 Nonurbanized Area Formula Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 385,920,000 

Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... (2,020,000 ) 

Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 2,277,688 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 386,177,688 

Section 5311(b)(3) Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP): 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8,080,000 

Less Amount Reserved for National RTAP ........................................................................................................................... (1,212,000 ) 

Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 452,588 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 7,320,588 

Section 5311(c) Public Transportation on Indian Reservations ................................................................................................. 10,000,000 

Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 144,000,000 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 144,000,000 

Section 5317 New Freedom Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 81,000,000 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 81,000,000 

Section 5320 Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 23,000,000 

Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... (115,000 ) 

Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ 22,885,000 

Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Program: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 25,000,000 

Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ 25,000,000 

Section 5340 Growing States and High Density States Formula: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 404,000,000 

Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... 404,000,000 

Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (Pub. L. 105–85, Section 3038) ................................................................................ 7,600,000 

CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS 

Section 5309 New Starts: 

Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,566,000,000 

Less Oversight (one percent) ................................................................................................................................................. (15,660,000 ) 

Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ 1,550,340,000 

RESEARCH 

Section 5314 National Research Program ................................................................................................................................. 61,000,000 

Total Appropriation (Above Grant Programs) ................................................................................................................. 4 8,886,275,000 

Total Apportionment/Allocation (Above Grant Programs) ............................................................................................... 8,802,012,856 

1Funding available for Cleans Fuels after $26,279,000 is transferred to the Bus and Bus Facility program. 

2 Includes $26,279,000 transferred from the Clean Fuels program. 

3Apportionments derived from the Section 5340 formula are combined with the Section 5307 or Section 5311 apportionments, as appropriate, 

in accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report. The amount of FY 2007 Section 5340 funds allotted to Sections 5307 and 

5311 apportionments is $340,734,486 and $63,265,514, respectively. 4The total amount appropriated for FTA programs in the 2007 Appropriations Act is $8.97 billion. The amount shown here only includes funding for the programs included in this notice and shown above. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13897 

TABLE 2.—FY 2007 SECTION 5303 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM AND SECTION 5304 

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM APPORTIONMENTS

State Section 5303 

Apportionment 

Section 5304 

Apportionment 

Alabama ....................................................................................................................................................... $623,537 $163,245 

Alaska .......................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Arizona ......................................................................................................................................................... 1,647,393 328,654 

Arkansas ...................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

California ...................................................................................................................................................... 12,958,856 2,524,485 

Colorado ...................................................................................................................................................... 1,234,513 270,193 

Connecticut .................................................................................................................................................. 915,017 239,542 

Delaware ...................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

District of Columbia ..................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Florida .......................................................................................................................................................... 5,383,172 1,132,759 

Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................ 2,123,217 421,322 

Hawaii .......................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................ 329,495 86,263 

Illinois ........................................................................................................................................................... 4,568,170 818,866 

Indiana ......................................................................................................................................................... 1,241,016 286,840 

Iowa ............................................................................................................................................................. 358,083 93,748 

Kansas ......................................................................................................................................................... 418,685 101,572 

Kentucky ...................................................................................................................................................... 522,554 131,756 

Louisiana ...................................................................................................................................................... 816,375 213,231 

Maine ........................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Maryland ...................................................................................................................................................... 1,846,450 361,392 

Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................. 2,426,009 473,882 

Michigan ....................................................................................................................................................... 2,709,982 553,221 

Minnesota .................................................................................................................................................... 1,156,508 228,043 

Mississippi .................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Missouri ........................................................................................................................................................ 1,219,834 259,906 

Montana ....................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Nebraska ...................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Nevada ......................................................................................................................................................... 603,074 140,968 

New Hampshire ........................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................. 3,821,314 652,050 

New Mexico ................................................................................................................................................. 329,495 86,263 

New York ..................................................................................................................................................... 7,283,541 1,303,850 

North Carolina .............................................................................................................................................. 1,208,033 316,268 

North Dakota ................................................................................................................................................ 329,495 86,263 

Ohio ............................................................................................................................................................. 2,621,420 614,838 

Oklahoma ..................................................................................................................................................... 476,561 124,766 

Oregon ......................................................................................................................................................... 733,094 166,181 

Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................................ 3,384,274 690,499 

Puerto Rico .................................................................................................................................................. 1,366,861 292,370 

Rhode Island ................................................................................................................................................ 340,461 86,263 

South Carolina ............................................................................................................................................. 601,892 157,578 

South Dakota ............................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Tennessee ................................................................................................................................................... 952,301 249,316 

Texas ........................................................................................................................................................... 6,046,857 1,244,248 

Utah ............................................................................................................................................................. 561,502 147,004 

Vermont ....................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Virginia ......................................................................................................................................................... 1,869,384 396,362 

Washington .................................................................................................................................................. 1,755,960 361,925 

West Virginia ................................................................................................................................................ 329,495 86,263 

Wisconsin ..................................................................................................................................................... 976,546 239,038 

Wyoming ...................................................................................................................................................... 329,495 86,263 

Total ...................................................................................................................................................... 82,373,861 17,252,652 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

1,000,000 or more in Population ................................................................................................................................................... $2,813,049,899 

200,000–999,999 in Population ..................................................................................................................................................... 703,215,992 

50,000–199,999 in Population ....................................................................................................................................................... 408,554,898 

National Total ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,924,820,789 

Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 1,000,000 or more in Population: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13898 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. $55,761,620 

Baltimore, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 49,089,558 

Boston, MA—NH—RI ............................................................................................................................................................. 127,815,567 

Chicago, IL—IN ...................................................................................................................................................................... 217,715,515 

Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ......................................................................................................................................................... 17,033,068 

Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 27,673,490 

Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10,928,770 

Dallas—Fort Worth—Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................ 59,020,474 

Denver—Aurora, CO .............................................................................................................................................................. 39,136,659 

Detroit, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... 38,094,061 

Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 58,301,315 

Indianapolis, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10,248,899 

Kansas City, MO—KS ............................................................................................................................................................ 12,881,212 

Las Vegas, NV ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20,777,680 

Los Angeles—Long Beach—Santa Ana, CA ......................................................................................................................... 252,472,410 

Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 90,748,583 

Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19,252,383 

Minneapolis—St. Paul, MN .................................................................................................................................................... 44,372,728 

New Orleans, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 15,985,953 

New York—Newark, NY—NJ—CT ......................................................................................................................................... 773,326,809 

Orlando, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 17,277,382 

Philadelphia, PA—NJ—DE—MD ........................................................................................................................................... 128,386,607 

Phoenix—Mesa, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................ 41,539,986 

Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 32,625,253 

Portland, OR—WA ................................................................................................................................................................. 33,570,887 

Providence, RI—MA ............................................................................................................................................................... 29,223,529 

Riverside—San Bernardino, CA ............................................................................................................................................. 24,442,636 

Sacramento, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 19,060,682 

San Antonio, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20,220,591 

San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 50,877,342 

San Francisco—Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................ 116,823,368 

San Jose, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 35,547,337 

San Juan, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... 34,245,529 

Seattle, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 81,229,871 

St. Louis, MO—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... 29,347,313 

Tampa—St. Petersburg, FL ................................................................................................................................................... 21,325,746 

Virginia Beach, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. 15,781,255 

Washington, DC—VA—MD .................................................................................................................................................... 140,887,831 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2,813,049,899 

Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 to 999,999 in Population: 

Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ............................................................................................................................... 4,430,621 

Akron, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6,012,478 

Albany, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9,379,662 

Albuquerque, NM .................................................................................................................................................................... 7,085,159 

Allentown—Bethlehem, PA—NJ ............................................................................................................................................ 7,088,907 

Anchorage, AK ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21,287,890 

Ann Arbor, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4,224,205 

Antioch, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5,500,312 

Asheville, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,628,856 

Atlantic City, NJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9,300,302 

Augusta—Richmond County, GA—SC .................................................................................................................................. 2,235,714 

Austin, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... 16,379,355 

Bakersfield, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5,451,483 

Barnstable Town, MA ............................................................................................................................................................. 4,652,919 

Baton Rouge, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 4,313,787 

Birmingham, AL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5,778,323 

Boise City, ID .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,373,419 

Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ................................................................................................................................................... 2,379,398 

Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY ............................................................................................................................................. 22,465,747 

Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. 15,491,573 

Canton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3,462,625 

Cape Coral, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3,793,233 

Charleston—North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................ 3,164,700 

Charlotte, NC—SC ................................................................................................................................................................. 13,294,549 

Chattanooga, TN—GA ........................................................................................................................................................... 2,944,537 

Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................ 5,130,742 

Columbia, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,838,851 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13899 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Columbus, GA—AL ................................................................................................................................................................ 1,993,783 

Concord, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 18,526,133 

Corpus Christi, TX .................................................................................................................................................................. 4,293,492 

Davenport, IA—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... 3,381,015 

Dayton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 13,892,841 

Daytona Beach—Port Orange, FL ......................................................................................................................................... 4,045,922 

Denton—Lewisville, TX .......................................................................................................................................................... 2,476,542 

Des Moines, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4,951,610 

Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5,433,693 

El Paso, TX—NM ................................................................................................................................................................... 9,813,797 

Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4,011,179 

Evansville, IN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................. 1,889,514 

Fayetteville, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2,141,034 

Flint, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5,533,594 

Fort Collins, CO ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2,205,831 

Fort Wayne, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2,617,543 

Fresno, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7,498,898 

Grand Rapids, MI ................................................................................................................................................................... 6,374,744 

Greensboro, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3,562,705 

Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,949,452 

Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ............................................................................................................................................................... 1,682,238 

Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4,565,188 

Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18,191,100 

Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 24,359,495 

Huntsville, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,649,487 

Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ............................................................................................................................. 3,241,472 

Jackson, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,277,259 

Jacksonville, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14,212,171 

Knoxville, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,765,878 

Lancaster, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,506,448 

Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ...................................................................................................................................................... 6,532,964 

Lansing, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4,609,169 

Lexington—Fayette, KY .......................................................................................................................................................... 2,893,966 

Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2,467,031 

Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3,579,121 

Louisville, KY—IN ................................................................................................................................................................... 11,007,849 

Lubbock, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,550,878 

Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6,222,444 

McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,996,078 

Memphis, TN—MS—AR ......................................................................................................................................................... 11,980,593 

Mission Viejo, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... 8,662,702 

Mobile, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2,668,998 

Modesto, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3,649,709 

Nashville—Davidson, TN ........................................................................................................................................................ 7,261,045 

New Haven, CT ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16,872,742 

Ogden—Layton, UT ................................................................................................................................................................ 5,501,787 

Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................. 6,652,716 

Omaha, NE—IA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6,472,286 

Oxnard, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 6,883,603 

Palm Bay—Melbourne, FL ..................................................................................................................................................... 4,152,721 

Pensacola, FL—AL ................................................................................................................................................................. 2,688,166 

Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2,688,082 

Port St. Lucie, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... 2,108,150 

Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY .............................................................................................................................................. 14,577,592 

Provo—Orem, UT ................................................................................................................................................................... 4,449,426 

Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5,621,983 

Reading, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,714,080 

Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4,727,812 

Richmond, VA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9,102,781 

Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10,423,380 

Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,428,345 

Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI .............................................................................................................. 3,667,889 

Salem, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3,516,835 

Salt Lake City, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. 20,100,518 

Santa Rosa, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3,565,829 

Sarasota—Bradenton, FL ....................................................................................................................................................... 5,903,675 

Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,877,433 

Scranton, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,764,506 

Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,913,954 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13900 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

South Bend, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................... 3,723,608 

Spokane, WA—ID .................................................................................................................................................................. 6,434,323 

Springfield, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... 11,353,845 

Springfield, MO ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,966,333 

Stockton, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7,171,540 

Syracuse, NY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6,281,223 

Tallahassee, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2,354,393 

Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................................................................................ 2,272,609 

Thousand Oaks, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... 2,596,721 

Toledo, OH—MI ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5,842,150 

Trenton, NJ ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8,347,699 

Tucson, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................. 10,230,078 

Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ 5,489,623 

Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ............................................................................................................................... 2,303,151 

Wichita, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4,440,719 

Winston—Salem, NC .............................................................................................................................................................. 2,647,492 

Worcester, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... 7,858,481 

Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................................................................................ 3,309,761 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 703,215,992 

Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population: 

ALABAMA ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 7,250,334 

Anniston, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 673,045 

Auburn, AL .............................................................................................................................................................................. 622,422 

Decatur, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 592,014 

Dothan, AL .............................................................................................................................................................................. 567,616 

Florence, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 713,416 

Gadsden, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 558,511 

Montgomery, AL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2,302,892 

Tuscaloosa, AL ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,220,418 

ALASKA ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 738,556 

Fairbanks, AK ......................................................................................................................................................................... 738,556 

ARIZONA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,452,918 

Avondale, AZ .......................................................................................................................................................................... 869,823 

Flagstaff, AZ ........................................................................................................................................................................... 645,037 

Prescott, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................ 672,195 

Yuma, AZ—CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,265,863 

ARKANSAS ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4,901,814 

Fayetteville—Springdale, AR .................................................................................................................................................. 1,829,368 

Fort Smith, AR—OK ............................................................................................................................................................... 1,205,345 

Hot Springs, AR ...................................................................................................................................................................... 485,409 

Jonesboro, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ 508,041 

Pine Bluff, AR ......................................................................................................................................................................... 631,462 

Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ............................................................................................................................................ 242,189 

CALIFORNIA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 55,440,609 

Atascadero—El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA ............................................................................................................ 611,677 

Camarillo, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 903,008 

Chico, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,307,534 

Davis, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2,018,338 

El Centro, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 799,940 

Fairfield, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,174,306 

Gilroy—Morgan Hill, CA ......................................................................................................................................................... 1,045,584 

Hanford, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 960,929 

Hemet, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,639,472 

Livermore, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,217,592 

Lodi, CA .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,345,377 

Lompoc, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 732,286 

Madera, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 773,862 

Manteca, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 850,706 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13901 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Merced, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,868,541 

Napa, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,488,607 

Petaluma, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 911,852 

Porterville, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 851,929 

Redding, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,212,665 

Salinas, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3,092,358 

San Luis Obispo, CA .............................................................................................................................................................. 1,349,204 

Santa Barbara, CA ................................................................................................................................................................. 3,728,441 

Santa Clarita, CA .................................................................................................................................................................... 3,265,667 

Santa Cruz, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2,952,024 

Santa Maria, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1,875,199 

Seaside—Monterey—Marina, CA .......................................................................................................................................... 2,577,731 

Simi Valley, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2,108,442 

Tracy, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,121,151 

Turlock, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,148,728 

Vacaville, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,572,378 

Vallejo, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3,769,659 

Visalia, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,747,001 

Watsonville, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,053,998 

Yuba City, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,354,634 

Yuma, AZ—CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9,789 

COLORADO .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8,293,228 

Boulder, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,127,250 

Grand Junction, CO ................................................................................................................................................................ 1,002,471 

Greeley, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,312,260 

Lafayette—Louisville, CO ....................................................................................................................................................... 823,076 

Longmont, CO ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,468,975 

Pueblo, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,559,196 

CONNECTICUT ............................................................................................................................................................................. 17,987,220 

Danbury, CT—NY ................................................................................................................................................................... 6,896,204 

Norwich—New London, CT .................................................................................................................................................... 3,177,682 

Waterbury, CT ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7,913,334 

DELAWARE ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,317,343 

Dover, DE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,288,816 

Salisbury, MD—DE ................................................................................................................................................................. 28,527 

FLORIDA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 21,357,992 

Brooksville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 993,287 

Deltona, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,610,174 

Fort Walton Beach, FL ........................................................................................................................................................... 1,636,390 

Gainesville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,641,987 

Kissimmee, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,102,630 

Lady Lake, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................... 464,231 

Lakeland, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,417,959 

Leesburg—Eustis, FL ............................................................................................................................................................. 988,439 

North Port—Punta Gorda, FL ................................................................................................................................................. 1,240,112 

Ocala, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,028,813 

Panama City, FL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1,316,602 

St. Augustine, FL .................................................................................................................................................................... 568,072 

Titusville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 942,936 

Vero Beach—Sebastian, FL ................................................................................................................................................... 1,263,626 

Winter Haven, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... 1,604,997 

Zephyrhills, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 537,737 

GEORGIA ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8,760,015 

Albany, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 989,427 

Athens—Clarke County, GA ................................................................................................................................................... 1,312,463 

Brunswick, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 500,167 

Dalton, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 536,009 

Gainesville, GA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 805,000 

Hinesville, GA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 578,175 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13902 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Macon, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,486,745 

Rome, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,083,099 

Valdosta, GA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 608,832 

Warner Robins, GA ................................................................................................................................................................ 860,098 

HAWAII .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,026,247 

Kailua (Honolulu County)—Kaneohe, HI ................................................................................................................................ 2,026,247 

IDAHO ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 3,939,639 

Coeur d’Alene, ID ................................................................................................................................................................... 841,280 

Idaho Falls, ID ........................................................................................................................................................................ 824,600 

Lewiston, ID—WA .................................................................................................................................................................. 356,711 

Nampa, ID .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,160,278 

Pocatello, ID ........................................................................................................................................................................... 756,770 

ILLINOIS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10,882,018 

Alton, IL .................................................................................................................................................................................. 910,786 

Beloit, WI—IL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 141,978 

Bloomington—Normal, IL ....................................................................................................................................................... 1,874,630 

Champaign, IL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,523,127 

Danville, IL .............................................................................................................................................................................. 582,432 

Decatur, IL .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,350,371 

DeKalb, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................... 825,760 

Dubuque, IA—IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 28,816 

Kankakee, IL ........................................................................................................................................................................... 826,220 

Springfield, IL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,817,898 

INDIANA ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10,733,698 

Anderson, IN ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,012,189 

Bloomington, IN ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,483,511 

Columbus, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................... 580,600 

Elkhart, IN—MI ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,409,420 

Kokomo, IN ............................................................................................................................................................................. 831,958 

Lafayette, IN ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,300,689 

Michigan City, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................. 769,298 

Muncie, IN .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,451,646 

Terre Haute, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 894,387 

IOWA ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8,071,720 

Ames, IA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,365,236 

Cedar Rapids, IA .................................................................................................................................................................... 2,080,013 

Dubuque, IA—IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 762,548 

Iowa City, IA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,569,025 

Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ......................................................................................................................................................... 1,013,167 

Waterloo, IA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,281,731 

KANSAS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3,073,575 

Lawrence, KS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,383,389 

St. Joseph, MO—KS .............................................................................................................................................................. 12,124 

Topeka, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,678,062 

KENTUCKY ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,857,079 

Bowling Green, KY ................................................................................................................................................................. 619,391 

Clarksville, TN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................ 267,824 

Huntington, WV—KY—OH ..................................................................................................................................................... 557,729 

Owensboro, KY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 747,772 

Radcliff—Elizabethtown, KY ................................................................................................................................................... 664,363 

LOUISIANA .................................................................................................................................................................................... 8,036,529 

Alexandria, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 769,069 

Houma, LA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,334,550 

Lafayette, LA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,026,465 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13903 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Lake Charles, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 1,341,153 

Mandeville—Covington, LA .................................................................................................................................................... 617,428 

Monroe, LA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,147,923 

Slidell, LA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 799,941 

MAINE ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 4,381,796 

Bangor, ME ............................................................................................................................................................................. 613,623 

Dover—Rochester, NH—ME .................................................................................................................................................. 109,513 

Lewiston, ME .......................................................................................................................................................................... 896,326 

Portland, ME ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,678,244 

Portsmouth, NH—ME ............................................................................................................................................................. 84,090 

MARYLAND ................................................................................................................................................................................... 10,670,642 

Aberdeen—Havre de Grace—Bel Air, MD ............................................................................................................................. 2,900,711 

Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... 810,873 

Frederick, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,915,132 

Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... 1,441,127 

Salisbury, MD—DE ................................................................................................................................................................. 905,376 

St. Charles, MD ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,464,195 

Westminster, MD .................................................................................................................................................................... 1,233,228 

MASSACHUSETTS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6,662,936 

Leominster—Fitchburg, MA .................................................................................................................................................... 2,398,315 

Nashua, NH—MA ................................................................................................................................................................... 504 

New Bedford, MA ................................................................................................................................................................... 3,106,662 

Pittsfield, MA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,157,455 

MICHIGAN ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 13,046,789 

Battle Creek, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................... 825,952 

Bay City, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,078,081 

Benton Harbor—St. Joseph, MI ............................................................................................................................................. 612,662 

Elkhart, IN—MI ....................................................................................................................................................................... 17,527 

Holland, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,053,030 

Jackson, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,198,756 

Kalamazoo, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,305,463 

Michigan City, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................. 5,021 

Monroe, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. 591,206 

Muskegon, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,617,501 

Port Huron, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,146,273 

Saginaw, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,613,157 

South Lyon—Howell—Brighton, MI ........................................................................................................................................ 982,160 

MINNESOTA .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5,052,284 

Duluth, MN—WI ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,369,705 

Fargo, ND—MN ...................................................................................................................................................................... 489,703 

Grand Forks, ND—MN ........................................................................................................................................................... 104,502 

La Crosse, WI—MN ............................................................................................................................................................... 75,927 

Rochester, MN ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,500,230 

St. Cloud, MN ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,512,217 

MISSISSIPPI .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,220,077 

Hattiesburg, MS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 647,302 

Pascagoula, MS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 572,775 

MISSOURI ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4,104,533 

Columbia, MO ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,135,945 

Jefferson City, MO .................................................................................................................................................................. 542,439 

Joplin, MO .............................................................................................................................................................................. 698,235 

Lee’s Summit, MO .................................................................................................................................................................. 714,301 

St. Joseph, MO—KS .............................................................................................................................................................. 1,013,613 

MONTANA ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,826,793 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13904 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Billings, MT ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,230,011 

Great Falls, MT ....................................................................................................................................................................... 798,682 

Missoula, MT .......................................................................................................................................................................... 798,100 

N. MARIANA ISLANDS ................................................................................................................................................................. 697,739 

Saipan, MP ............................................................................................................................................................................. 697,739 

NEBRASKA ................................................................................................................................................................................... 197,384 

Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ......................................................................................................................................................... 197,384 

NEVADA ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 713,838 

Carson City, NV ...................................................................................................................................................................... 713,838 

NEW HAMPSHIRE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5,262,172 

Dover—Rochester, NH—ME .................................................................................................................................................. 1,156,340 

Manchester, NH ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,695,898 

Nashua, NH—MA ................................................................................................................................................................... 2,009,813 

Portsmouth, NH—ME ............................................................................................................................................................. 400,121 

NEW JERSEY ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3,960,617 

Hightstown, NJ ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,431,763 

Vineland, NJ ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,596,004 

Wildwood—North Wildwood—Cape May, NJ ........................................................................................................................ 932,850 

NEW MEXICO ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2,771,368 

Farmington, NM ...................................................................................................................................................................... 515,759 

Las Cruces, NM ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,119,267 

Santa Fe, NM ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,136,342 

NEW YORK ................................................................................................................................................................................... 10,570,026 

Binghamton, NY—PA ............................................................................................................................................................. 2,695,012 

Danbury, CT—NY ................................................................................................................................................................... 73,552 

Elmira, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,224,805 

Glens Falls, NY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 794,650 

Ithaca, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,245,902 

Kingston, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,334,020 

Middletown, NY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 710,718 

Saratoga Springs, NY ............................................................................................................................................................. 792,015 

Utica, NY ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,699,352 

NORTH CAROLINA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 11,251,514 

Burlington, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 972,420 

Concord, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,125,674 

Gastonia, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,355,445 

Goldsboro, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 576,504 

Greenville, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 963,326 

Hickory, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,645,632 

High Point, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,354,550 

Jacksonville, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... 994,423 

Rocky Mount, NC ................................................................................................................................................................... 645,662 

Wilmington, NC ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,617,878 

NORTH DAKOTA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,535,331 

Bismarck, ND .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,158,007 

Fargo, ND—MN ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,608,082 

Grand Forks, ND—MN ........................................................................................................................................................... 769,242 

OHIO .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 9,376,620 

Huntington, WV—KY—OH ..................................................................................................................................................... 365,291 

Lima, OH ................................................................................................................................................................................ 783,147 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13905 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Lorain—Elyria, OH .................................................................................................................................................................. 2,613,598 

Mansfield, OH ......................................................................................................................................................................... 836,717 

Middletown, OH ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,092,416 

Newark, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,054,173 

Parkersburg, WV—OH ........................................................................................................................................................... 257,045 

Sandusky, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 554,395 

Springfield, OH ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,058,335 

Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA .................................................................................................................................... 441,368 

Wheeling, WV—OH ................................................................................................................................................................ 320,135 

OKLAHOMA ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,197,292 

Fort Smith, AR—OK ............................................................................................................................................................... 22,819 

Lawton, OK ............................................................................................................................................................................. 956,432 

Norman, OK ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,218,041 

OREGON ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,902,420 

Bend, OR ................................................................................................................................................................................ 611,658 

Corvallis, OR .......................................................................................................................................................................... 687,751 

Longview, WA—OR ................................................................................................................................................................ 16,389 

Medford, OR ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,586,622 

PENNSYLVANIA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 14,667,053 

Altoona, PA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,008,352 

Binghamton, NY—PA ............................................................................................................................................................. 43,896 

Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... 137 

Erie, PA .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2,890,238 

Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... 12,605 

Hazleton, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 574,760 

Johnstown, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,204,512 

Lebanon, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 767,631 

Monessen, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,192,580 

Pottstown, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 725,687 

State College, PA ................................................................................................................................................................... 1,817,883 

Uniontown—Connellsville, PA ................................................................................................................................................ 812,804 

Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA .................................................................................................................................... 2,733 

Williamsport, PA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1,437,612 

York, PA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2,175,623 

PUERTO RICO .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10,639,870 

Arecibo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,449,086 

Fajardo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................ 828,071 

Florida—Barceloneta—Bajadero, PR ..................................................................................................................................... 644,671 

Guayama, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... 842,124 

Juana Diaz, PR ...................................................................................................................................................................... 565,662 

Mayaguez, PR ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,310,689 

Ponce, PR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2,884,958 

San German—Cabo Rojo—Sabana Grande, PR .................................................................................................................. 1,013,945 

Yauco, PR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,100,664 

RHODE ISLAND ............................................................................................................................................................................ 0 

SOUTH CAROLINA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6,726,460 

Anderson, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... 640,244 

Florence, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................... 983,511 

Mauldin—Simpsonville, SC .................................................................................................................................................... 786,738 

Myrtle Beach, SC ................................................................................................................................................................... 1,425,464 

Rock Hill, SC .......................................................................................................................................................................... 659,663 

Spartanburg, SC ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1,331,315 

Sumter, SC ............................................................................................................................................................................. 899,525 

SOUTH DAKOTA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,675,777 

Rapid City, SD ........................................................................................................................................................................ 818,753 

Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ......................................................................................................................................................... 33,565 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13906 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Sioux Falls, SD ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,823,459 

TENNESSEE ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6,725,215 

Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA .......................................................................................................................................................... 347,289 

Clarksville, TN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................ 1,010,092 

Cleveland, TN ......................................................................................................................................................................... 556,853 

Jackson, TN ............................................................................................................................................................................ 948,789 

Johnson City, TN .................................................................................................................................................................... 958,145 

Kingsport, TN—VA ................................................................................................................................................................. 840,182 

Morristown, TN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 519,063 

Murfreesboro, TN ................................................................................................................................................................... 1,544,802 

TEXAS ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 34,766,686 

Abilene, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,343,172 

Amarillo, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,333,958 

Beaumont, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,540,933 

Brownsville, TX ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2,734,539 

College Station—Bryan, TX ................................................................................................................................................... 1,824,951 

Galveston, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,392,401 

Harlingen, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,274,698 

Killeen, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2,279,352 

Lake Jackson—Angleton, TX ................................................................................................................................................. 905,070 

Laredo, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3,593,958 

Longview, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................... 827,477 

McKinney, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... 648,017 

Midland, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,228,930 

Odessa, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,349,048 

Port Arthur, TX ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,517,318 

San Angelo, TX ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,025,875 

Sherman, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................... 629,197 

Temple, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. 801,485 

Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ............................................................................................................................................ 462,132 

Texas City, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,170,152 

The Woodlands, TX ................................................................................................................................................................ 1,096,274 

Tyler, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,138,058 

Victoria, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. 595,076 

Waco, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,899,585 

Wichita Falls, TX .................................................................................................................................................................... 1,155,030 

UTAH ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,863,771 

Logan, UT ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,143,363 

St. George, UT ....................................................................................................................................................................... 720,408 

VERMONT ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,508,546 

Burlington, VT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,508,546 

VIRGIN ISLANDS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 843,840 

VIRGINIA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9,280,295 

Blacksburg, VA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,063,831 

Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA .......................................................................................................................................................... 202,992 

Charlottesville, VA .................................................................................................................................................................. 1,481,189 

Danville, VA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 538,282 

Fredericksburg, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. 1,006,793 

Harrisonburg, VA .................................................................................................................................................................... 857,517 

Kingsport, TN—VA ................................................................................................................................................................. 15,906 

Lynchburg, VA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,220,972 

Roanoke, VA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,318,325 

Winchester, VA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 574,488 

WASHINGTON .............................................................................................................................................................................. 14,358,531 

Bellingham, WA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,564,038 

Bremerton, WA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2,349,035 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13907 

TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 

5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Kennewick—Richland, WA ..................................................................................................................................................... 2,459,462 

Lewiston, ID—WA .................................................................................................................................................................. 208,036 

Longview, WA—OR ................................................................................................................................................................ 737,928 

Marysville, WA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,208,535 

Mount Vernon, WA ................................................................................................................................................................. 790,127 

Olympia—Lacey, WA ............................................................................................................................................................. 2,246,977 

Wenatchee, WA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1,148,346 

Yakima, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,646,047 

WEST VIRGINIA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5,794,143 

Charleston, WV ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2,181,992 

Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... 22,703 

Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... 297,138 

Huntington, WV—KY—OH ..................................................................................................................................................... 987,340 

Morgantown, WV .................................................................................................................................................................... 718,666 

Parkersburg, WV—OH ........................................................................................................................................................... 670,607 

Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA .................................................................................................................................... 306,355 

Wheeling, WV—OH ................................................................................................................................................................ 609,342 

WISCONSIN .................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,669,410 

Appleton, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,492,784 

Beloit, WI—IL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 523,641 

Duluth, MN—WI ...................................................................................................................................................................... 430,307 

Eau Claire, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,329,387 

Fond du Lac, WI ..................................................................................................................................................................... 649,706 

Green Bay, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,339,401 

Janesville, WI ......................................................................................................................................................................... 819,067 

Kenosha, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,613,367 

La Crosse, WI—MN ............................................................................................................................................................... 1,275,881 

Oshkosh, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1,326,506 

Racine, WI .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,811,896 

Sheboygan, WI ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,049,497 

Wausau, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,007,970 

WYOMING ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,512,596 

Casper, WY ............................................................................................................................................................................ 710,204 

Cheyenne, WY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 802,392 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 408,554,898 

1 Language in section 5307(l) provides for the treatment of the Virgin Islands as an urbanized area. 

TABLE 4.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 APPORTIONMENT FORMULA

Distribution of Available Funds 

Of the funds made available to the Section 5307 program, a one percent takedown is authorized for Small Transit Intensive Cities. This amount 

is apportioned to the Governors based on a separate formula that uses criteria related to specific service performance categories. 

The remaining 99% is apportioned to small, medium, and large sized urbanized areas (UZAs). 9.32% is made available for UZAs 50,000–

199,999 in population, and 90.68% to UZAs 200,000 or more in population. 

UZA Population and Weighting Factors 

50,000–199,999 in population (Apportioned to Governors).9.32% of available Section 5307 funds. 

50% apportioned based on population. 

50% apportioned based on population × population density. 

200,000 and greater in population (Apportioned to 

UZAs).

90.68% of available Section 5307 funds. 

33.29% (Fixed Guideway Tier*). 

95.61% (Non-incentive Portion of Tier). 

—at least 0.75% to each UZA with commuter rail and pop. 750,000 or greater. 

60%—fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles. 

40%—fixed guideway route miles. 

4.39% (‘‘Incentive Portion’’ of Tier). 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13908 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 4.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 APPORTIONMENT FORMULA—Continued 

—at least 0.75% to each UZA with commuter rail and pop. 750,000 or greater. 

—fixed guideway passenger miles × fixed guideway passenger miles/operating cost. 

66.71% (‘‘Bus’’ Tier). 

90.8% (Non-incentive Portion of Tier). 

73.39% for UZAs with population 1,000,000 or greater. 

50%—bus revenue vehicle miles. 

25%—population. 

25%—population × population density. 

26.61% for UZAs pop. < 1,000,000. 

50%—bus revenue vehicle miles. 

25%— population. 

25%—population × density. 

9.2% (‘‘Incentive’’ Portion of Tier). 

—bus passenger miles × bus passenger miles/operating cost. 

* Includes all fixed guideway modes, such as heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, automated guideway transit, ferryboats, exclusive busways, and HOV lanes. 

TABLE 5.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 FORMULA PROGRAMS APPORTIONMENT DATA UNIT VALUES

Apportionment 

data unit value 

Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Bus Tier: 

Urbanized Areas Over 1,000,000: 

Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... $3.00227624 

Population × Density ......................................................................................................................................................... 0.00076177 

Bus Revenue Vehicle Mile ................................................................................................................................................ 0.39097622 

Urbanized Areas Under 1,000,000: 

Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2.75146798 

Population × Density ......................................................................................................................................................... 0.00120387 

Bus Revenue Vehicle Mile ................................................................................................................................................ 0.51070792 

Bus Incentive (PM denotes Passenger Mile): 

Bus PM × Bus PM = Operating Cost ................................................................................................................................ 0.00750408 

Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Fixed Guideway Tier: 

Fixed Guideway Revenue Vehicle Mile ............................................................................................................................ 0.58113740 

Fixed Guideway Route Mile .............................................................................................................................................. 30,545 

Commuter Rail Floor .................................................................................................................................................. 7,680,270 

Fixed Guideway Incentive: 

Fixed Guideway PM × Fixed Guideway PM = Operating Cost ........................................................................................ 0.00065678 

Commuter Rail Incentive Floor .................................................................................................................................. 352,645 

Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Areas Under 200,000: 

Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... $5.53398866 

Population × Density ......................................................................................................................................................... 0.00275286 

Section 5307 Small Transit Intensive Cities: 

For Each Qualifying Performance Category ..................................................................................................................... 120,608 

Section 5311 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Areas Under 50,000 

Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4.31350350 

Section 5309 Capital Program—Fixed Guideway Modernization: 

Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Tier 6 Tier 7 

Legislatively Specified Areas: 

Revenue Vehicle Mile ........................ $0.03043443 ........................ $0.13671435 $0.03477564 $0.02292899 $0.21152760

Route Mile ......................................... 2,122.43 ........................ 7,825.39 2,620.89 1,728.06 15,941.94 

Other Urbanized Areas: 

Revenue Vehicle Mile ........................ 0.16288440 0.00576164 0.13671435 0.06921684 0.05650354 0.78189598 

Route Mile ......................................... 4,758.70 168.33 7,825.39 2,017.29 1,646.77 22,787.98 

Notes: 

1. Unit values for Section 5307 do not take into account Section 5340 funding added to the program. 

2. The unit value for Section 5311 is based on the total nonurbanized/rural population for the States and territories. It does not take into account Section 5311 funds allocated based on land area in nonurbanized areas, or Section 5340 funding added to the program. 

TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS

[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] 

State Urbanized area (UZA) description 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

mile 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

hour 

Vehicle 

revenue 

mile per 

capita 

Vehicle 

revenue 

hour per 

capita 

Passenger 

miles per 

capita 

Passenger 

trips per 

capita 

Number of 

performance factors met or 

exceeded 

STIC funding: @ 

$120,608 

per factor 

met or 

exceeded 

Average for UZAs with populations 

200,000–999,999.

5.561 95.935 10.951 0.729 72.570 13.348 

Alabama ............. Anniston, AL ................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 $0 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13909 

TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] 

State Urbanized area (UZA) description 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

mile 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

hour 

Vehicle 

revenue 

mile per 

capita 

Vehicle 

revenue 

hour per 

capita 

Passenger 

miles per 

capita 

Passenger 

trips per 

capita 

Number of 

performance factors met or 

exceeded 

STIC funding: @ 

$120,608 

per factor 

met or 

exceeded 

Alabama ............. Auburn, AL ..................................... 1.000 16.716 5.719 0.342 5.719 1.732 0 0 

Alabama ............. Decatur, AL .................................... 1.000 16.772 7.733 0.461 7.733 2.780 0 0 

Alabama ............. Dothan, AL ..................................... 1.000 22.792 6.700 0.294 6.700 2.391 0 0 

Alabama ............. Florence, AL ................................... 1.093 15.975 8.252 0.565 9.021 2.577 0 0 

Alabama ............. Gadsden, AL .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Alabama ............. Montgomery, AL ............................. 2.897 46.236 6.732 0.422 19.501 3.807 0 0 

Alabama ............. Tuscaloosa, AL ............................... 2.680 28.693 2.829 0.264 7.579 1.181 0 0 

Alaska ................. Fairbanks, AK ................................. 6.859 105.298 8.463 0.551 58.051 8.092 2 241,216 

Arizona ............... Avondale, AZ .................................. 4.349 0.000 0.743 0.000 3.233 0.000 0 0 

Arizona ............... Flagstaff, AZ ................................... 2.540 34.781 7.905 0.577 20.076 7.800 0 0 

Arizona ............... Prescott, AZ .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Arizona ............... Yuma, AZ—CA ............................... 1.515 16.822 8.028 0.723 12.167 1.719 0 0 

Arkansas ............ Fayetteville-Springdale, AR ............ 3.371 40.016 4.768 0.402 16.072 8.268 0 0 

Arkansas ............ Fort Smith, AR—OK ....................... 2.081 29.584 4.734 0.333 9.852 2.108 0 0 

Arkansas ............ Hot Springs, AR ............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Arkansas ............ Jonesboro, AR ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Arkansas ............ Pine Bluff, AR ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Atascadero—El Paso de Robles 

(Paso Robles), CA.

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Camarillo, CA ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Chico, CA ....................................... 3.425 42.826 9.354 0.748 32.041 10.019 1 120,608 

California ............ Davis, CA ....................................... 8.983 151.628 18.082 1.071 162.432 51.747 6 723,646 

California ............ El Centro, CA ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Fairfield, CA .................................... 3.274 63.781 13.171 0.676 43.116 7.041 1 120,608 

California ............ Gilroy—Morgan Hill, CA ................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Hanford, CA .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Hemet, CA ...................................... 1.893 0.000 7.263 0.000 13.749 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Livermore, CA ................................ 3.248 0.000 5.338 0.000 17.337 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Lodi, CA .......................................... 1.944 21.289 6.952 0.635 13.511 5.269 0 0 

California ............ Lompoc, CA .................................... 7.519 112.958 8.249 0.549 62.028 5.958 2 241,216 

California ............ Madera, CA .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Manteca, CA ................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Merced, CA .................................... 1.929 34.230 13.968 0.787 26.946 9.535 2 241,216 

California ............ Napa, CA ........................................ 2.778 39.639 13.360 0.936 37.120 9.813 2 241,216 

California ............ Petaluma, CA ................................. 5.103 0.000 2.804 0.000 14.312 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Porterville, CA ................................ 3.225 48.188 8.955 0.599 28.880 8.041 0 0 

California ............ Redding, CA ................................... 3.438 55.384 11.285 0.701 38.801 7.876 1 120,608 

California ............ Salinas, CA ..................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ San Luis Obispo, CA ...................... 22.048 263.797 7.402 0.619 163.195 16.362 4 482,431 

California ............ Santa Barbara, CA ......................... 10.352 140.225 13.451 0.993 139.238 36.757 6 723,646 

California ............ Santa Clarita, CA ........................... 12.879 418.549 31.535 0.970 406.124 20.689 6 723,646 

California ............ Santa Cruz, CA .............................. 8.392 125.105 24.349 1.633 204.347 35.654 6 723,646 

California ............ Santa Maria, CA ............................. 1.945 27.602 4.997 0.352 9.716 6.582 0 0 

California ............ Seaside—Monterey—Marina, CA .. 6.765 103.062 28.289 1.857 191.379 38.283 6 723,646 

California ............ Simi Valley, CA .............................. 4.548 118.010 10.348 0.399 47.063 4.209 1 120,608 

California ............ Tracy, CA ....................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Turlock, CA ..................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Vacaville, CA .................................. 5.892 0.000 0.805 0.000 4.745 0.000 1 120,608 

California ............ Vallejo, CA ...................................... 9.476 244.654 24.678 0.956 233.857 18.416 6 723,646 

California ............ Visalia, CA ...................................... 4.902 65.558 9.659 0.722 47.347 10.970 0 0 

California ............ Watsonville, CA .............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

California ............ Yuba City, CA ................................. 5.329 83.369 9.914 0.634 52.829 6.911 0 0 

Colorado ............. Boulder, CO .................................... 9.335 0.000 15.645 0.000 146.044 0.000 3 361,824 

Colorado ............. Grand Junction, CO ....................... 4.163 57.198 7.201 0.524 29.978 7.385 0 0 

Colorado ............. Greeley, CO ................................... 3.305 39.308 5.685 0.478 18.788 4.955 0 0 

Colorado ............. Lafayette—Louisville, CO ............... 7.445 0.000 9.349 0.000 69.608 0.000 1 120,608 

Colorado ............. Longmont, CO ................................ 7.004 0.000 22.598 0.000 158.281 0.000 3 361,824 

Colorado ............. Pueblo, CO ..................................... 3.762 53.996 6.932 0.483 26.081 8.324 0 0 

Connecticut ........ Danbury, CT—NY .......................... 21.337 1614.082 41.055 0.543 875.975 5.407 4 482,431 

Connecticut ........ Norwich—New London, CT ............ 5.761 177.809 10.620 0.344 61.178 5.395 2 241,216 

Connecticut ........ Waterbury, CT ................................ 20.385 1130.418 34.678 0.625 706.904 10.075 4 482,431 

Delaware ............ Dover, DE ....................................... 2.786 0.000 29.906 0.000 83.304 0.000 2 241,216 

Florida ................ Brooksville, FL ................................ 1.683 26.954 3.095 0.193 5.209 1.325 0 0 

Florida ................ Deltona, FL ..................................... 3.296 0.000 9.152 0.000 30.164 0.000 0 0 

Florida ................ Fort Walton Beach, FL ................... 1.057 16.369 8.221 0.531 8.691 1.340 0 0 

Florida ................ Gainesville, FL ................................ 9.524 109.979 18.039 1.562 171.808 50.648 6 723,646 

Florida ................ Kissimmee, FL ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Florida ................ Lady Lake, FL ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Florida ................ Lakeland, FL ................................... 2.378 38.374 20.144 1.248 47.893 11.172 2 241,216 

Florida ................ Leesburg—Eustis, FL ..................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Florida ................ North Port—Punta Gorda, FL ........ 1.008 15.649 4.250 0.274 4.284 0.568 0 0 

Florida ................ Ocala, FL ........................................ 3.569 49.160 3.921 0.285 13.991 2.870 0 0 

Florida ................ Panama City, FL ............................ 1.196 19.087 8.866 0.556 10.605 3.401 0 0 

Florida ................ St. Augustine, FL ............................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Florida ................ Titusville, FL ................................... 6.329 0.000 15.557 0.000 98.453 0.000 3 361,824 

Florida ................ Vero Beach—Sebastian, FL ........... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13910 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] 

State Urbanized area (UZA) description 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

mile 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

hour 

Vehicle 

revenue 

mile per 

capita 

Vehicle 

revenue 

hour per 

capita 

Passenger 

miles per 

capita 

Passenger 

trips per 

capita 

Number of 

performance factors met or 

exceeded 

STIC funding: @ 

$120,608 

per factor 

met or 

exceeded 

Florida ................ Winter Haven, FL ........................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Florida ................ Zephyrhills, FL ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Georgia ............... Albany, GA ..................................... 5.160 82.472 7.089 0.443 36.576 7.233 0 0 

Georgia ............... Athens—Clarke County, GA .......... 6.103 81.046 7.639 0.575 46.617 14.020 2 241,216 

Georgia ............... Brunswick, GA ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Georgia ............... Dalton, GA ...................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Georgia ............... Gainesville, GA ............................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Georgia ............... Hinesville, GA ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Georgia ............... Macon, GA ..................................... 4.353 62.271 8.223 0.575 35.796 7.774 0 0 

Georgia ............... Rome, GA ....................................... 15.144 286.192 9.379 0.496 142.038 14.248 4 482,431 

Georgia ............... Valdosta, GA .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Georgia ............... Warner Robins, GA ........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Hawaii ................. Kailua (Honolulu County)—

Kaneohe, HI.

9.044 0.000 2.136 0.000 19.322 0.000 1 120,608 

Idaho .................. Coeur d’Alene, ID ........................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Idaho .................. Idaho Falls, ID ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Idaho .................. Lewiston, ID—WA .......................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Idaho .................. Nampa, ID ...................................... 3.032 0.000 4.135 0.000 12.538 0.000 0 0 

Idaho .................. Pocatello, ID ................................... 5.309 64.497 6.859 0.565 36.414 7.586 0 0 

Illinois ................. Alton, IL .......................................... 4.442 0.000 4.451 0.000 19.774 0.000 0 0 

Illinois ................. Bloomington—Normal, IL ............... 3.753 50.475 11.621 0.864 43.618 11.694 2 241,216 

Illinois ................. Champaign, IL ................................ 9.207 104.802 22.557 1.982 207.674 81.684 6 723,646 

Illinois ................. Danville, IL ...................................... 2.032 36.342 5.963 0.333 12.117 6.539 0 0 

Illinois ................. Decatur, IL ...................................... 2.845 38.648 11.160 0.821 31.746 10.814 2 241,216 

Illinois ................. DeKalb, IL ....................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Illinois ................. Kankakee, IL .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Illinois ................. Springfield, IL ................................. 2.558 32.374 9.442 0.746 24.154 8.734 1 120,608 

Indiana ............... Anderson, IN .................................. 1.370 15.495 4.726 0.418 6.473 2.135 0 0 

Indiana ............... Bloomington, IN .............................. 6.828 72.674 10.499 0.986 71.691 23.619 3 361,824 

Indiana ............... Columbus, IN .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Indiana ............... Elkhart, IN—MI ............................... 1.637 25.774 6.212 0.394 10.167 2.245 0 0 

Indiana ............... Kokomo, IN ..................................... 1.022 10.475 10.834 1.057 11.073 2.473 1 120,608 

Indiana ............... Lafayette, IN ................................... 9.352 110.918 11.821 0.997 110.553 33.814 6 723,646 

Indiana ............... Michigan City, IN—MI .................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Indiana ............... Muncie, IN ...................................... 4.339 55.708 12.793 0.996 55.505 20.253 3 361,824 

Indiana ............... Terre Haute, IN .............................. 1.114 10.396 4.395 0.471 4.898 2.523 0 0 

Iowa .................... Ames, IA ......................................... 5.851 62.469 20.602 1.930 120.547 84.629 5 603,039 

Iowa .................... Cedar Rapids, IA ............................ 3.561 51.368 9.023 0.625 32.126 7.288 0 0 

Iowa .................... Dubuque, IA—IL ............................. 3.159 40.963 8.520 0.657 26.917 9.730 0 0 

Iowa .................... Iowa City, IA ................................... 4.351 48.382 20.356 1.831 88.575 60.513 4 482,431 

Iowa .................... Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ................ 3.752 41.819 5.960 0.535 22.362 7.686 0 0 

Iowa .................... Waterloo, IA .................................... 1.046 16.200 8.615 0.556 9.014 4.238 0 0 

Kansas ............... Lawrence, KS ................................. 1.542 19.585 10.318 0.813 15.915 6.362 1 120,608 

Kansas ............... Topeka, KS ..................................... 3.907 57.593 9.245 0.627 36.121 9.979 0 0 

Kentucky ............. Bowling Green, KY ......................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Kentucky ............. Owensboro, KY .............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Kentucky ............. Radcliff—Elizabethtown, KY ........... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Louisiana ............ Alexandria, LA ................................ 4.818 73.290 7.022 0.462 33.834 8.149 0 0 

Louisiana ............ Houma, LA ..................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Louisiana ............ Lafayette, LA .................................. 7.035 96.853 4.853 0.353 34.146 7.735 2 241,216 

Louisiana ............ Lake Charles, LA ............................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Louisiana ............ Mandeville—Covington, LA ............ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Louisiana ............ Monroe, LA ..................................... 0.000 0.000 6.234 0.441 0.000 8.528 0 0 

Louisiana ............ Slidell, LA ....................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Maine ................. Bangor, ME .................................... 5.056 66.260 9.264 0.707 46.842 11.554 0 0 

Maine ................. Lewiston, ME .................................. 1.499 22.244 16.243 1.094 24.344 6.553 2 241,216 

Maine ................. Portland, ME ................................... 11.014 225.504 15.863 0.775 174.722 14.007 6 723,646 

Maryland ............. Aberdeen—Havre de Grace—Bel 

Air, MD.

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Maryland ............. Cumberland, MD—WV—PA .......... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Maryland ............. Frederick, MD ................................. 2.907 34.264 8.215 0.697 23.881 4.644 0 0 

Maryland ............. Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ........... 2.366 35.097 4.055 0.273 9.595 2.563 0 0 

Maryland ............. Salisbury, MD—DE ........................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Maryland ............. St. Charles, MD .............................. 1.000 16.484 16.509 1.002 16.509 5.497 2 241,216 

Maryland ............. Westminster, MD ............................ 1.285 14.512 11.387 1.008 14.630 2.398 2 241,216 

Massachusetts ... Leominster—Fitchburg, MA ............ 3.086 40.653 24.328 1.847 75.075 10.259 3 361,824 

Massachusetts ... New Bedford, MA ........................... 2.992 55.171 16.915 0.917 50.617 11.564 2 241,216 

Massachusetts ... Pittsfield, MA .................................. 1.000 18.899 15.536 0.822 15.536 9.641 2 241,216 

Michigan ............. Battle Creek, MI ............................. 3.325 48.817 7.142 0.486 23.747 6.658 0 0 

Michigan ............. Bay City, MI .................................... 1.779 30.715 22.091 1.279 39.296 7.846 2 241,216 

Michigan ............. Benton Harbor—St. Joseph, MI ..... 1.454 18.988 6.443 0.493 9.370 2.625 0 0 

Michigan ............. Holland, MI ..................................... 1.013 13.938 6.855 0.498 6.942 2.009 0 0 

Michigan ............. Jackson, MI .................................... 1.955 31.619 14.478 0.895 28.301 8.040 2 241,216 

Michigan ............. Kalamazoo, MI ............................... 4.279 51.456 10.919 0.908 46.721 15.554 2 241,216 

Michigan ............. Monroe, MI ..................................... 2.233 0.000 8.699 0.000 19.426 0.000 0 0 

Michigan ............. Muskegon, MI ................................. 3.767 49.825 3.575 0.270 13.467 2.830 0 0 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13911 

TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] 

State Urbanized area (UZA) description 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

mile 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

hour 

Vehicle 

revenue 

mile per 

capita 

Vehicle 

revenue 

hour per 

capita 

Passenger 

miles per 

capita 

Passenger 

trips per 

capita 

Number of 

performance factors met or 

exceeded 

STIC funding: @ 

$120,608 

per factor 

met or 

exceeded 

Michigan ............. Port Huron, MI ................................ 1.262 19.105 21.936 1.449 27.675 10.026 2 241,216 

Michigan ............. Saginaw, MI .................................... 4.331 45.565 4.239 0.403 18.358 4.558 0 0 

Michigan ............. South Lyon—Howell—Brighton, MI 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Minnesota ........... Duluth, MN—WI ............................. 4.716 61.291 15.634 1.203 73.725 23.122 4 482,431 

Minnesota ........... Rochester, MN ............................... 5.253 75.693 11.377 0.790 59.761 14.724 3 361,824 

Minnesota ........... St. Cloud, MN ................................. 4.256 57.593 15.536 1.148 66.127 20.310 3 361,824 

Mississippi .......... Hattiesburg, MS .............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Mississippi .......... Pascagoula, MS ............................. 2.585 0.000 0.913 0.000 2.360 0.000 0 0 

Missouri .............. Columbia, MO ................................ 3.873 45.856 5.470 0.462 21.185 5.469 0 0 

Missouri .............. Jefferson City, MO ......................... 2.682 38.910 9.855 0.679 26.428 7.530 0 0 

Missouri .............. Joplin, MO ...................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Missouri .............. Lee’s Summit, MO .......................... 1.709 0.000 0.340 0.000 0.581 0.000 0 0 

Missouri .............. St. Joseph, MO—KS ...................... 2.035 20.631 8.766 0.865 17.839 3.750 1 120,608 

Montana ............. Billings, MT ..................................... 3.115 46.552 8.029 0.537 25.008 7.198 0 0 

Montana ............. Great Falls, MT .............................. 1.599 18.232 8.128 0.713 12.996 7.075 0 0 

Montana ............. Missoula, MT .................................. 4.097 59.850 9.654 0.661 39.554 9.587 0 0 

N. Mariana Islands.Saipan, MP ..................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Nevada ............... Carson City, NV ............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

New Hampshire .. Dover—Rochester, NH—ME .......... 7.043 200.293 11.188 0.393 78.799 3.921 4 482,431 

New Hampshire .. Manchester, NH ............................. 2.422 30.917 3.789 0.297 9.176 2.950 0 0 

New Hampshire .. Nashua, NH—MA ........................... 3.974 51.853 2.325 0.178 9.238 1.794 0 0 

New Hampshire .. Portsmouth, NH—ME ..................... 5.238 0.000 2.790 0.000 14.614 0.000 0 0 

New Jersey ........ Hightstown, NJ ............................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

New Jersey ........ Vineland, NJ ................................... 1.000 12.815 7.706 0.601 7.706 1.666 0 0 

New Jersey ........ Wildwood—North Wildwood—Cape 

May, NJ.

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

New Mexico ........ Farmington, NM .............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

New Mexico ........ Las Cruces, NM ............................. 3.994 49.054 5.472 0.446 21.855 6.431 0 0 

New Mexico ........ Santa Fe, NM ................................. 2.025 25.982 12.897 1.005 26.112 7.556 2 241,216 

New York ............ Binghamton, NY—PA ..................... 3.711 49.460 16.368 1.228 60.741 18.853 3 361,824 

New York ............ Elmira, NY ...................................... 2.463 49.413 15.358 0.765 37.821 8.935 2 241,216 

New York ............ Glens Falls, NY .............................. 3.323 51.206 5.420 0.352 18.009 5.009 0 0 

New York ............ Ithaca, NY ....................................... 4.114 55.888 35.366 2.603 145.491 58.887 4 482,431 

New York ............ Kingston, NY .................................. 15.198 761.431 37.582 0.750 571.166 8.743 5 603,039 

New York ............ Middletown, NY .............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

New York ............ Saratoga Springs, NY .................... 5.826 0.000 2.680 0.000 15.616 0.000 1 120,608 

New York ............ Utica, NY ........................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Burlington, NC ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Concord, NC ................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Gastonia, NC .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Goldsboro, NC ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Greenville, NC ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Hickory, NC .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... High Point, NC ............................... 2.229 45.998 6.640 0.322 14.802 5.357 0 0 

North Carolina .... Jacksonville, NC ............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Rocky Mount, NC ........................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

North Carolina .... Wilmington, NC .............................. 2.721 33.338 7.116 0.581 19.363 7.643 0 0 

North Dakota ...... Bismarck, ND ................................. 1.015 13.622 13.516 1.007 13.719 3.750 2 241,216 

North Dakota ...... Fargo, ND—MN .............................. 3.316 43.693 7.275 0.552 24.124 8.410 0 0 

North Dakota ...... Grand Forks, ND—MN ................... 0.944 15.058 10.318 0.647 9.738 5.550 0 0 

Ohio .................... Lima, OH ........................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Ohio .................... Lorain—Elyria, OH ......................... 3.159 112.180 16.299 0.459 51.489 4.421 2 241,216 

Ohio .................... Mansfield, OH ................................. 3.190 34.016 3.869 0.363 12.339 4.090 0 0 

Ohio .................... Middletown, OH .............................. 4.599 65.193 2.723 0.192 12.523 2.477 0 0 

Ohio .................... Newark, OH .................................... 0.578 8.976 16.137 1.040 9.331 3.358 2 241,216 

Ohio .................... Sandusky, OH ................................ 1.538 19.927 4.907 0.379 7.547 1.755 0 0 

Ohio .................... Springfield, OH ............................... 2.853 34.643 2.889 0.238 8.242 3.452 0 0 

Ohio .................... Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—

PA.

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Oklahoma ........... Lawton, OK ..................................... 2.437 35.614 6.546 0.448 15.951 2.944 0 0 

Oklahoma ........... Norman, OK ................................... 4.961 57.268 5.082 0.440 25.210 11.149 0 0 

Oregon ............... Bend, OR ........................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Oregon ............... Corvallis, OR .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Oregon ............... Medford, OR ................................... 3.065 35.614 7.111 0.612 21.793 10.218 0 0 

Pennsylvania ...... Altoona, PA .................................... 3.895 51.980 6.838 0.512 26.631 8.142 0 0 

Pennsylvania ...... Erie, PA .......................................... 3.512 42.414 13.364 1.107 46.937 14.458 3 361,824 

Pennsylvania ...... Hazleton, PA .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Pennsylvania ...... Johnstown, PA ............................... 7.474 82.666 9.135 0.826 68.280 16.500 3 361,824 

Pennsylvania ...... Lebanon, PA ................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Pennsylvania ...... Monessen, PA ................................ 13.967 275.664 15.981 0.810 223.212 6.348 5 603,039 

Pennsylvania ...... Pottstown, PA ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Pennsylvania ...... State College, PA ........................... 10.498 107.483 16.299 1.592 171.115 84.811 6 723,646 

Pennsylvania ...... Uniontown—Connellsville, PA ........ 2.255 43.590 16.953 0.877 38.229 4.163 2 241,216 

Pennsylvania ...... Williamsport, PA ............................. 7.269 113.177 12.912 0.829 93.853 21.403 6 723,646 

Pennsylvania ...... York, PA ......................................... 3.332 42.664 10.778 0.842 35.916 8.523 1 120,608 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13912 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] 

State Urbanized area (UZA) description 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

mile 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

hour 

Vehicle 

revenue 

mile per 

capita 

Vehicle 

revenue 

hour per 

capita 

Passenger 

miles per 

capita 

Passenger 

trips per 

capita 

Number of 

performance factors met or 

exceeded 

STIC funding: @ 

$120,608 

per factor 

met or 

exceeded 

Puerto Rico ........ Arecibo, PR .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Fajardo, PR .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Florida—Barceloneta—Bajadero, 

PR.

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Guayama, PR ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Juana Diaz, PR .............................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Mayaguez, PR ................................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Ponce, PR ...................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ San German—Cabo Rojo—

Sabana Grande, PR.

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Puerto Rico ........ Yauco, PR ...................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

South Carolina ... Anderson, SC ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

South Carolina ... Florence, SC .................................. 3.144 74.706 49.005 2.062 154.059 9.948 3 361,824 

South Carolina ... Mauldin-Simpsonville, SC .............. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

South Carolina ... Myrtle Beach, SC ........................... 1.923 37.376 17.376 0.894 33.411 5.704 2 241,216 

South Carolina ... Rock Hill, SC .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

South Carolina ... Spartanburg, SC ............................. 3.754 62.435 8.842 0.532 33.192 4.622 0 0 

South Carolina ... Sumter, SC ..................................... 1.823 35.954 31.545 1.600 57.515 5.492 2 241,216 

South Dakota ..... Rapid City, SD ................................ 2.698 32.025 5.780 0.487 15.597 3.823 0 0 

South Dakota ..... Sioux Falls, SD ............................... 2.655 33.059 9.870 0.793 26.206 6.659 1 120,608 

Tennessee .......... Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA .................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Tennessee .......... Clarksville, TN—KY ........................ 3.521 56.530 8.544 0.532 30.086 5.265 0 0 

Tennessee .......... Cleveland, TN ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Tennessee .......... Jackson, TN ................................... 2.985 40.313 11.140 0.825 33.257 6.949 2 241,216 

Tennessee .......... Johnson City, TN ............................ 3.258 36.171 4.374 0.394 14.250 3.909 0 0 

Tennessee .......... Kingsport, TN—VA ......................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Tennessee .......... Morristown, TN ............................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Tennessee .......... Murfreesboro, TN ........................... 7.178 0.000 0.296 0.000 2.128 0.000 1 120,608 

Texas ................. Abilene, TX ..................................... 2.458 34.052 9.894 0.714 24.320 5.667 0 0 

Texas ................. Amarillo, TX .................................... 1.766 27.759 4.882 0.311 8.623 2.161 0 0 

Texas ................. Beaumont, TX ................................ 3.481 48.579 6.096 0.437 21.218 4.820 0 0 

Texas ................. Brownsville, TX ............................... 16.391 188.614 5.245 0.456 85.964 10.111 3 361,824 

Texas ................. College Station—Bryan, TX ........... 1.408 28.726 6.826 0.335 9.613 4.643 0 0 

Texas ................. Galveston, TX ................................. 1.355 15.379 16.687 1.470 22.614 16.695 3 361,824 

Texas ................. Harlingen, TX ................................. 0.919 0.000 0.283 0.000 0.260 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Killeen, TX ...................................... 1.986 31.134 6.495 0.414 12.900 2.590 0 0 

Texas ................. Lake Jackson—Angleton, TX ......... 2.001 0.000 1.380 0.000 2.761 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Laredo, TX ...................................... 6.149 63.678 11.315 1.093 69.573 22.498 4 482,431 

Texas ................. Longview, TX .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. McKinney, TX ................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Midland, TX .................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Odessa, TX .................................... 0.000 0.000 6.105 0.394 0.000 2.812 0 0 

Texas ................. Port Arthur, TX ............................... 2.923 45.102 2.780 0.180 8.127 1.196 0 0 

Texas ................. San Angelo, TX .............................. 2.236 31.010 5.438 0.392 12.160 2.047 0 0 

Texas ................. Sherman, TX .................................. 2.037 33.628 6.888 0.417 14.027 2.420 0 0 

Texas ................. Temple, TX ..................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR .... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Texas City, TX ................................ 1.994 61.129 13.093 0.427 26.110 1.091 1 120,608 

Texas ................. The Woodlands, TX ....................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Tyler, TX ......................................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Texas ................. Victoria, TX ..................................... 0.000 0.000 5.992 0.450 0.000 2.597 0 0 

Texas ................. Waco, TX ........................................ 4.440 60.950 4.880 0.356 21.668 3.723 0 0 

Texas ................. Wichita Falls, TX ............................ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Utah .................... Logan, UT ....................................... 4.694 55.718 10.754 0.906 50.478 19.840 2 241,216 

Utah .................... St. George, UT ............................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Vermont .............. Burlington, VT ................................. 4.303 57.819 14.331 1.067 61.670 18.301 3 361,824 

Virgin Islands ...... Virgin Islands .................................. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Virginia ............... Blacksburg, VA ............................... 0.042 0.410 12.573 1.275 0.522 41.869 3 361,824 

Virginia ............... Charlottesville, VA .......................... 4.660 64.138 16.451 1.195 76.658 17.780 4 482,431 

Virginia ............... Danville, VA .................................... 0.968 13.828 6.207 0.434 6.006 4.356 0 0 

Virginia ............... Fredericksburg, VA ......................... 4.136 63.583 6.073 0.395 25.120 3.385 0 0 

Virginia ............... Harrisonburg, VA ............................ 5.428 56.195 9.156 0.884 49.699 21.843 2 241,216 

Virginia ............... Lynchburg, VA ................................ 5.530 83.076 11.470 0.763 63.424 11.329 2 241,216 

Virginia ............... Roanoke, VA .................................. 4.659 63.125 10.001 0.738 46.597 9.954 1 120,608 

Virginia ............... Winchester, VA ............................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

Washington ........ Bellingham, WA .............................. 5.389 73.671 24.068 1.761 129.709 41.983 4 482,431 

Washington ........ Bremerton, WA ............................... 4.874 91.030 33.516 1.795 163.367 29.793 4 482,431 

Washington ........ Kennewick—Richland, WA ............. 6.743 148.616 50.971 2.313 343.693 28.448 6 723,647 

Washington ........ Longview, WA—OR ....................... 4.212 48.298 5.856 0.511 24.665 6.044 0 0 

Washington ........ Marysville, WA ................................ 5.204 0.000 9.283 0.000 48.307 0.000 0 0 

Washington ........ Mount Vernon, WA ......................... 0.000 0.000 18.337 1.041 0.000 6.933 2 241,216 

Washington ........ Olympia—Lacey, WA ..................... 5.800 106.663 31.193 1.696 180.913 23.426 6 723,647 

Washington ........ Wenatchee, WA ............................. 5.101 92.754 30.350 1.669 154.813 14.543 4 482,431 

Washington ........ Yakima, WA .................................... 3.793 58.670 12.519 0.809 47.488 10.799 2 241,216 

West Virginia ...... Charleston, WV .............................. 3.629 60.941 16.392 0.976 59.487 11.786 2 241,216 

West Virginia ...... Huntington, WV—KY—OH ............. 3.187 46.737 6.202 0.423 19.762 4.101 0 0 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13913 

TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] 

State Urbanized area (UZA) description 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

mile 

Passenger 

miles per 

vehicle 

revenue 

hour 

Vehicle 

revenue 

mile per 

capita 

Vehicle 

revenue 

hour per 

capita 

Passenger 

miles per 

capita 

Passenger 

trips per 

capita 

Number of 

performance factors met or 

exceeded 

STIC funding: @ 

$120,608 

per factor 

met or 

exceeded 

West Virginia ...... Morgantown, WV ............................ 0.246 4.153 11.403 0.676 2.806 7.006 1 120,608 

West Virginia ...... Parkersburg, WV—OH ................... 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 

West Virginia ...... Wheeling, WV—OH ........................ 2.672 33.877 8.607 0.679 23.002 5.737 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Appleton, WI ................................... 3.362 51.983 9.456 0.612 31.790 6.161 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Beloit, WI-IL .................................... 2.809 45.416 6.251 0.387 17.559 4.850 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Eau Claire, WI ................................ 3.212 47.703 16.319 1.099 52.412 14.366 3 361,824 

Wisconsin ........... Fond du Lac, WI ............................. 0.000 0.000 7.694 0.628 0.000 3.752 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Green Bay, WI ................................ 3.555 52.536 10.398 0.704 36.963 9.781 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Janesville, WI ................................. 3.951 61.073 7.152 0.463 28.259 7.840 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Kenosha, WI ................................... 5.066 74.233 10.673 0.728 54.073 14.949 1 120,608 

Wisconsin ........... La Crosse, WI—MN ....................... 3.332 45.203 12.191 0.899 40.626 12.520 2 241,216 

Wisconsin ........... Oshkosh, WI ................................... 2.906 45.383 16.840 1.078 48.932 15.821 3 361,824 

Wisconsin ........... Racine, WI ...................................... 4.294 58.394 9.696 0.713 41.631 11.738 0 0 

Wisconsin ........... Sheboygan, WI ............................... 2.687 33.331 10.450 0.842 28.076 7.943 1 120,608 

Wisconsin ........... Wausau, WI .................................... 3.426 50.537 11.298 0.766 38.709 12.237 2 241,216 

Wyoming ............ Casper, WY .................................... 1.000 12.032 5.675 0.472 5.675 1.651 0 0 

Wyoming ............ Cheyenne, WY ............................... 1.520 22.089 7.253 0.499 11.025 2.842 0 0 

Total ............ ......................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 299 $36,061,750 

TABLE 7.—URBANIZED AREAS 200,000 OR MORE IN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO USE SECTION 5307 FUNDS FOR

OPERATING ASSISTANCE

State 2000 Census urbanized area description Population FY 2002 

Apportionment 

FY 2007 

Apportionment 

operating limitation a

AL ........ Huntsville, AL ............................................................................................................. 213,253 $1,677,473 $419,368 

CA ....... Antioch, CA ................................................................................................................ 217,591 1,914,688 478,672 

CA ....... Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ................................................................ 254,856 1,849,608 462,402 

(Indio—Coachella, CA—$621,797) 

(Palm Springs, CA—$1,227,811) 

CA ....... Lancaster—Palmdale, CA .......................................................................................... 263,532 2,206,544 551,636

CA ....... Santa Rosa, CA ......................................................................................................... 285,408 2,636,339 659,085 

CA ....... Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ................................................................... 200,436 1,311,837 327,959 

CA ....... Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................... 229,810 311,908 

CO ....... Fort Collins, CO ......................................................................................................... 206,757 1,156,197 289,049 

CT ........ Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY ................................................................................. 888,890 9,676,425 2,419,106 

(Stamford, CT—NY—5,332,860) 

(Norwalk, CT—$4,343,565) 

CT ........ Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................... 851,535 2,824,453 706,113 

(Bristol, CT—$983,277) 

(New Britain, CT—$1,841,176) 

FL ........ Port St. Lucie, FL ....................................................................................................... 270,774 1,982,206 495,552 

(Fort Pierce, FL—$1,142,501) 

(Stuart, FL—$839,705) 

FL ........ Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ...................................................................................... 221,251 954,953 238,738 

FL ........ Tallahassee, FL ......................................................................................................... 204,260 1,617,975 404,494 

GA ....... Savannah, GA ............................................................................................................ 208,886 1,824,225 456,056 

ID ......... Boise City, ID ............................................................................................................. 272,625 2,021,464 505,366 

IL ......... Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI ................................................. 226,848 1,088,609 272,152 

IL ......... Chicago, IL—IN .......................................................................................................... 8,307,904 6,599,240 1,649,810 

(Aurora, IL—$2,290,318) 

(Crystal Lake, IL—$746,464) 

(Elgin, IL—$1,652,124) 

(Joliet, IL—$1,910,334) 

IN ......... Evansville, IN—KY ..................................................................................................... 211,989 2,251,898 562,975 

MA ....... Barnstable Town, MA ................................................................................................ 243,667 538,120 134,530 

MA ....... Boston, MA—NH—RI ................................................................................................ 4,032,484 4,760,673 1,190,168

(Brockton, MA—$1,906,558) 

(Lowell, MA—NH—2,366,926) 

(Taunton, MA—$487,189) 

MD ....... Baltimore, MD ............................................................................................................ 2,076,354 858,335 214,584 

(Annapolis, MD—$858,335) 

MO ....... Springfield, MO .......................................................................................................... 215,004 1,748,930 437,233 

MS ....... Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ................................................................................................... 205,754 1,687,127 421,782 

NC ....... Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................... 299,290 1,811,413 452,853 

NC ....... Asheville, NC ............................................................................................................. 221,570 968,044 242,011 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13914 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 7.—URBANIZED AREAS 200,000 OR MORE IN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO USE SECTION 5307 FUNDS FOR

OPERATING ASSISTANCE—Continued 

State 2000 Census urbanized area description Population FY 2002 

Apportionment 

FY 2007 

Apportionment 

operating limitation a

NC ....... Greensboro, NC ......................................................................................................... 267,884 2,211,540 552,885 

NE ....... Lincoln, NE ................................................................................................................. 226,582 2,658,761 664,690 

NJ ........ Atlantic City, NJ ......................................................................................................... 227,180 1,842,968 460,742 

NY ....... Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ................................................................................. 351,982 2,225,147 556,287 

(Poughkeepsie, NY—$1,507,504) 

(Newburgh, NY—$717,643) 

OH ....... Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................... 417,437 465,043 116,261 

(Sharon, PA—OH—$465,043) 

OH ....... Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ............................................................................................ 1,503,262 1,384,842 346,211 

(Hamilton, OH—$1,384,842) 

OR ....... Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................... 224,049 2,559,936 639,984 

OR ....... Salem, OR ................................................................................................................. 207,229 2,070,221 517,555 

PA ........ Reading, PA ............................................................................................................... 240,264 2,636,837 659,209 

PA ........ Lancaster, PA ............................................................................................................ 323,554 2,258,871 564,718 

PR ....... Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ................................................................... 299,086 1,148,984 287,246 

PR ....... San Juan, PR ............................................................................................................. 2,216,616 5,925,223 1,481,306 

(Caguas, PR—$2,811,557) 

(Cayey, PR—$831,273) 

(Humacao, PR—$719,451) 

(Vega Baja—Manati, PR—$1,562,942) 

RI ......... Providence, RI—MA .................................................................................................. 1,174,548 2,695,482 673,871

(Newport, RI—$644,329) 

(Fall River, MA—RI—$2,051,153) 

TX ........ Lubbock, TX ............................................................................................................... 202,225 1,939,424 484,856 

TX ........ Denton—Lewisville, TX .............................................................................................. 299,823 1,291,722 322,931 

(Denton, TX—$599,570) 

(Lewisville, TX—$692,152) 

VA ........ Richmond, VA ............................................................................................................ 818,836 1,016,957 254,239 

(Petersburg, VA—$1,016,957) 

aThe amount shown represents the maximum amount allowable, in accordance with section 5307(b)(2), based on funding provided in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007. In cases where an urbanized area’s FY 2007 apportionment is less than the maximum, FTA will set the 

operating assistance budget, in TEAM-Web, at an amount not to exceed the FY 2007 aortionment. 

Note: For informational purposes, the affected 1990 census small urbanized areas (less than 200,000 population) that were merged into an 

existing urbanized area of at least 200,000 population are shown in parentheses immediately below the eligible 2000 census urbanized area. 

FTA is unable to identify the urbanized areas which now incorporate rural areas that received Section 5311 in FY 2002 and they are not included 

in this table. 

TABLE 8.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID SAFETEA–LU 

Project No. Project Unobligated allocation 

California ................. E2007–CLNF–001 .............. 611 San Joaquin Region Transit District, California, Hybrid 

Diesel—Electric Replacement Buses.

$250,000 

Colorado .................. E2007–CLNF–002 .............. 519 Denver Regional Transit District—Bus Replacements ... 952,000 

Delaware ................. E2007–CLNF–003 .............. 517 Delaware Statewide Bus and Bus Replacement (with 

Clean Fuel (hybrid) vehicles)).

2,000,000 

Delaware ................. E2007–CLNF–004 .............. 648 University of Delaware Fuel Cell Bus Program .............. 165,000 

Georgia ................... E2007–CLNF–005 .............. 578 Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority—Clean 

Fuel Buses.

2,380,000 

Kentucky ................. E2007–CLNF–006 .............. 640 Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky—TANK Bus Replacement Project.476,000 

Kentucky ................. E2007–CLNF–007 .............. 641 Transit Authority of River City—New Hybrid Electric 

Bus.

714,000 

New Mexico ............ E2007–CLNF–008 .............. 497 Santa Fe, NM, Trails Bus and Bus Facilities .................. 714,000 

Nevada .................... E2007–CLNF–009 .............. 612 Lake Tahoe, NV, MPO Bus Replacement ...................... 500,000 

New York ................ E2007–CLNF–010 .............. 557 Westchester, NY, Bee Line Bus Replacement ............... 1,000,000 

Ohio ......................... E2007–CLNF–011 .............. 659 Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority—Bus Replacements.500,000 

Rhode Island ........... E2007–CLNF–012 .............. 631 Rhode Island, Statewide Bus and Van Replacement .... 714,000 

Tennessee .............. E2007–CLNF–013 .............. 605 Sevierville County, TN, Transportation Board—Alternative Fuel Buses.5,500,000 

Texas ...................... E2007–CLNF–014 .............. 614 City of El Paso—Sun Metro—Bus Replacements .......... 238,000 

Texas ...................... E2007–CLNF–015 .............. 575 METRO of Harris County—Discretionary Bus Program 2,380,000 

Texas ...................... E2007–CLNF–016 .............. 638 The District, The Woodlands, TX—Bus Replacement 

Program.

238,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13915 

TABLE 8.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID SAFETEA–LU 

Project No. Project Unobligated allocation 

Total Allocation ............................................................................................................................................................................. a 18,721,000 

aFunds in the amount of $26,279,000 were transferred to the Bus and Bus Facilities program. 

TABLE 9.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID Project location and description Unobligated 

allocation 

FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations: 

CO ........ E2006–CLNF–001 ............................ Denver Regional Transit District—Bus Replacements ............................... $906,840 

DE ........ E2006–CLNF–002 ............................ Delaware Statewide Bus and Bus Replacement (with Clean Fuel (hybrid) 

vehicles)).

1,732,500 

GA ........ E2006–CLNF–004 ............................ Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority—Clean Fuel Buses .............. 2,268,090 

KY ........ E2006–CLNF–005 ............................ Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky—TANK Bus Replacement Project 453,420 

KY ........ E2006–CLNF–006 ............................ Transit Authority of River City—New Hybrid Electric Bus .......................... 680,130 

NV ........ E2006–CLNF–009 ............................ Lake Tahoe, NV MPO Bus Replacement ................................................... 990,000 

NY ........ E2006–CLNF–010 ............................ Westchester, NY, Bee Line Bus Replacement ........................................... 445,500 

OH ........ E2006–CLNF–011 ............................ Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority—Bus Replacements .............. 680,130 

RI .......... E2006–CLNF–012 ............................ Rhode Island, Statewide Bus and Van Replacement ................................ 5,197,500 

TX ......... E2006–CLNF–015 ............................ The District, The Woodlands, TX—Bus Replacement Program ................ 226,710 

TX ......... E2006–CLNF–007 ............................ City of El Paso—Sun Metro—Bus Replacements ...................................... 680,130 

TX ......... E2006–CLNF–014 ............................ METRO of Harris County—Discretionary Bus Program ............................. 2,268,090 

Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ 16,529,040 

TABLE 10.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPORTIONMENTS

State Area Apportionment 

Alaska ...................................................................................... Anchorage, AK-Alaska Railroad .............................................. $15,304,279 

Arizona ..................................................................................... Phoenix-Mesa, AZ ................................................................... 2,727,749 

California .................................................................................. Antioch, CA ............................................................................. 2,397,573 

California .................................................................................. Concord, CA ............................................................................ 14,827,853 

California .................................................................................. Lancaster-Palmdale, CA ......................................................... 2,472,963 

California .................................................................................. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA ............................... 47,162,438 

California .................................................................................. Mission Viejo, CA .................................................................... 1,669,337 

California .................................................................................. Oxnard, CA .............................................................................. 1,361,410 

California .................................................................................. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA ................................................ 4,674,142 

California .................................................................................. Sacramento, CA ...................................................................... 4,217,137 

California .................................................................................. San Diego, CA ........................................................................ 17,096,411 

California .................................................................................. San Francisco-Oakland, CA .................................................... 78,470,061 

California .................................................................................. San Jose, CA .......................................................................... 15,813,901 

California .................................................................................. Stockton, CA ........................................................................... 1,858,672 

California .................................................................................. Thousand Oaks, CA ................................................................ 749,991 

Colorado .................................................................................. Denver-Aurora, CO ................................................................. 3,817,847 

Connecticut .............................................................................. Hartford, CT ............................................................................. 1,857,763 

Connecticut .............................................................................. Southwestern Connecticut ...................................................... 42,377,921 

District of Columbia ................................................................. Washington, DC-VA-MD ......................................................... 88,798,182 

Florida ...................................................................................... Jacksonville, FL ....................................................................... 339,321 

Florida ...................................................................................... Miami, FL ................................................................................. 23,791,654 

Florida ...................................................................................... Orlando, FL ............................................................................. 194,236 

Florida ...................................................................................... Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL ....................................................... 153,077 

Georgia .................................................................................... Atlanta, GA .............................................................................. 31,502,427 

Hawaii ...................................................................................... Honolulu, HI ............................................................................. 1,469,728 

Illinois ....................................................................................... Chicago, IL–IN ......................................................................... 158,124,928 

Illinois ....................................................................................... Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL–WI ................ 2,661,899 

Indiana ..................................................................................... South Bend, IN-MI ................................................................... 929,785 

Louisiana .................................................................................. New Orleans, LA ..................................................................... 3,344,890 

Maryland .................................................................................. Baltimore Commuter Rail ........................................................ 21,514,734 

Maryland .................................................................................. Baltimore, MD .......................................................................... 10,875,752 

Massachusetts ......................................................................... Boston, MA .............................................................................. 82,507,419 

Massachusetts ......................................................................... Worcester, MA–CT .................................................................. 1,196,344 

Michigan ................................................................................... Detroit, MI ................................................................................ 633,165 

Minnesota ................................................................................ Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN ........................................................ 9,206,554 

Missouri .................................................................................... Kansas City, MO–KS .............................................................. 36,707 

Missouri .................................................................................... St. Louis, MO–IL ..................................................................... 4,511,230 

New Jersey .............................................................................. Atlantic City, NJ ....................................................................... 1,344,854 

New Jersey .............................................................................. Northeastern New Jersey ........................................................ 98,770,666 

New Jersey .............................................................................. Trenton, NJ .............................................................................. 1,817,555 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13916 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 10.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

State Area Apportionment 

New York ................................................................................. Buffalo, NY .............................................................................. 1,433,849 

New York ................................................................................. New York ................................................................................. 413,117,471 

New York ................................................................................. Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ............................................... 2,602,812 

North Carolina .......................................................................... Charlotte, NC–SC .................................................................... 193,962 

Ohio ......................................................................................... Cleveland, OH ......................................................................... 13,568,489 

Ohio ......................................................................................... Dayton, OH .............................................................................. 6,101,723 

Oregon ..................................................................................... Portland, OR–WA .................................................................... 8,508,419 

Pennsylvania ............................................................................ Harrisburg, PA ......................................................................... 900,502 

Pennsylvania ............................................................................ Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................................................. 103,056,750 

Pennsylvania ............................................................................ Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................... 21,369,178 

Puerto Rico .............................................................................. San Juan, PR .......................................................................... 2,695,830 

Rhode Island ............................................................................ Providence, RI-MA .................................................................. 2,817,164 

Tennessee ............................................................................... Chattanooga, TN–GA .............................................................. 99,359 

Tennessee ............................................................................... Memphis, TN–MS–AR ............................................................. 442,377 

Texas ....................................................................................... Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX .............................................. 7,350,589 

Texas ....................................................................................... Houston, TX ............................................................................ 9,430,395 

Virginia ..................................................................................... Virginia Beach, VA .................................................................. 1,430,582 

Washington .............................................................................. Seattle, WA ............................................................................. 31,857,041 

West Virginia ............................................................................ Morgantown, WV ..................................................................... 2,772,852 

Wisconsin ................................................................................. Madison, WI ............................................................................ 869,698 

Wisconsin ................................................................................. Milwaukee, WI ......................................................................... 318,403 

Total .................................................................................. .................................................................................................. $1,433,520,000 

TABLE 11.—FY 2007 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION PROGRAM APPORTIONMENT FORMULA

Tier 1 ............ First $497,7000,000 to the following areas: 

Baltimore .......................................................................... $8,372,000 

Boston .............................................................................. 38,948,000 

Chicago/NW. Indiana ....................................................... 78,169,000 

Cleveland ......................................................................... 9,509,500 

New Orleans .................................................................... 1,730,588 

New York ......................................................................... 176,034,461 

NE. New Jersey ............................................................... 50,604,653 

Philadelphia/So. New Jersey ........................................... 58,924,764 

Pittsburgh ......................................................................... 13,662,463 

San Francisco .................................................................. 33,989,571 

SW. Connecticut .............................................................. 27,755,000 

Tier 2 ............ Next $70,000,000 as follows: Tier 2(A): 50 percent is allocated to areas identified in Tier 1; Tier 2(B): 50 percent is allocated to 

other urbanized areas with fixed guideway tiers in operation at least seven years. Funds are allocated by the Urbanized Area 

Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors that were used to apportion funds for the fixed guideway modernization 

program in FY 1997. 

Tier 3 ............ Next $5,700,000 as follows: Pittsburgh 61.76%; Cleveland 10.73%; New Orleans 5.79%; and 21.72% is allocated to all other 

areas in Tier 2(B) by the same fixed guideway tier formula factors used in fiscal year 1997. 

Tier 4 ............ Next $186,600,000 as follows: All eligible areas using the same year fixed guideway tier formula factors used in fiscal year 1997. 

Tier 5 ............ Next $70,000,000 as follows: 65% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 35% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors. Any segment that is less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database. 

Tier 6 ............ Next $50,000,000 as follows: 60% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 40% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors. Any segment less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database. 

Tier 7 ............ Remaining amounts as follows: 50% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 50% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway formula factors. Any segment that is less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database. 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0001 ......... 427 Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal parking facility ...................... $1,200,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0002 ......... 466 Anchorage-Transit Needs ....................................................................... 238,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0003 ......... 422 C Street Expanded bus facility and inter-modal parking garage, Anchorage, AK.1,200,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0004 ......... 425 CITC Non-profit Services Center inter-modal parking facility, Anchorage, AK.720,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0005 ......... 541 Hoonah, AK–Intermodal Ferry Dock ...................................................... 476,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0006 ......... 416 Improve marine inter-modal facilities in Ketchikan ................................ 3,360,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0007 ......... 436 Intermodal facility improvements at the Port of Anchorage ................... 6,000,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13917 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0008 ......... 236 Juneau, Alaska-transit bus acquisition and transit center ..................... 360,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0009 ......... 550 Juneau-Transit Bus Acquisition and Transit Center .............................. 357,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0010 ......... 553 Ketchikan, Alaska-Transit Needs ........................................................... 60,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0011 ......... 574 Matsu, Alaska-Transit Needs ................................................................. 119,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0012 ......... 423 Morris Thompson Cultural and Visitors Center intermodal parking facility, Fairbanks, AK.600,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0013 ......... 596 North Slope Borough, AK–Transit Purposes ......................................... 476,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0014 ......... 597 North Star Borough, AK–Transit Purposes ............................................ 238,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0015 ......... 616 Sitka, Alaska-Transit Needs ................................................................... 60,000 

AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0016 ......... 664 Wrangell, AK–Ferry Infrastructure .......................................................... 238,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0017 ......... 461 Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind-Bus project .................................. 119,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0018 ......... 462 Alabama State Port Authority-Choctaw Point Terminal ......................... 4,760,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0019 ......... 437 American Village/Montevallo, Alabama construction of closed loop Access Road, bus lanes and parking facility.80,256 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0020 ......... 469 Auburn University-Intermodal Parking Garage ...................................... a/ 952,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0021 ......... 98 Birmingham, AL Expansion of Downtown Intermodal Facility, Phase II 401,280 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0022 ......... 496 City of Birmingham, AL–Birmingham Downtown Intermodal Terminal, 

Phase II.

1,190,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0023 ......... 501 City of Huntsville, AL-Cummings Park Intermodal Center ..................... 1,190,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0024 ......... 503 City of Montgomery, AL–ITS Acquisition and Implementation .............. 952,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0025 ......... 504 City of Montgomery, AL–Montgomery Airport Intermodal Center .......... 952,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0026 ......... 507 City of Tuscaloosa, AL–Intermodal Facility ............................................ 1,428,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0027 ......... 528 Gadsden, AL–Community Buses ........................................................... 119,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0028 ......... 534 Gulf Shores, AL–Community Bases ....................................................... 238,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0029 ......... 582 Mobile County, AL Commission-Bus project .......................................... 119,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0030 ......... 644 University of Alabama in Birmingham Intermodal Facility ..................... 1,666,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0031 ......... 645 University of Alabama in Huntsville Intermodal Facility ......................... 1,428,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0032 ......... 646 University of Alabama Intermodal Facility South ................................... 2,142,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0033 ......... 647 University of Alabama Transit System ................................................... 357,000 

AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0034 ......... 650 US Space and Rocket Center, AL–Tramway Expansion ...................... 238,000 

AR ............ E2007–BUSP–0035 ......... 487 Central Arkansas Transit Authority Facility Upgrades ........................... 550,000 

AR ............ E2007–BUSP–0036 ......... 231 Harrison, Arkansas-Trolley Barn ............................................................ 8,026 

AR ............ E2007–BUSP–0037 ......... 263 Wilmar, AR Develop the Southeast Arkansas Intermodal Facility ......... 401,280 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0038 ......... 304 Coconino County buses and bus facilities for Flagstaff, AZ .................. 250,800 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0039 ......... 229 Coconino County, Arizona-Bus and bus facilities for the Sedona Transit System.190,608 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0040 ......... 47 Phoenix, AZ Construct City of Phoenix para-transit facility (Dial-ARide).200,640 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0041 ......... 346 Phoenix, AZ Construct metro bus facility in Phoenix’s West Valley ...... 1,003,200 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0042 ......... 150 Phoenix, AZ Construct regional heavy bus maintenance facility ........... 200,640 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0043 ......... 26 Scottsdale, Arizona-Plan, design, and construct intermodal center ...... 501,600 

AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0044 ......... 203 Tempe, Arizona-Construct East Valley Metro Bus Facility .................... 1,304,160 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0045 ......... 75 Alameda County, CA AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project ... 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0046 ......... 288 Alameda County, CA AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project ... 401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0047 ......... 398 Amador County, California-Regional Transit Center .............................. 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0048 ......... 76 Baldwin Park, CA Construct vehicle and bicycle parking lot and pedestrian rest area at transit center.401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0049 ......... 227 Berkeley, CA Construct Ed Roberts Campus Intermodal Transit Disability Center.601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0050 ......... 119 Burbank, CA CNG Transit Vehicles Purchase for Local Transit Network Expansion.90,288 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0051 ......... 396 Burbank, CA Construction of Empire Area Transit Center near Burbank Airport.50,160 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0052 ......... 190 Calexico, CA Purchase new buses for the Calexico Transit System .... 60,192 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0053 ......... 132 Carson, CA Purchase one bus .............................................................. 50,160 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0054 ......... 407 Carson, CA Purchase one trolley-bus vehicle ....................................... 50,160 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0055 ......... 108 Carson, CA Purchase two transfer facility ............................................. 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0056 ......... 54 City of Alameda, CA Plan, design, and construct intermodal facility .... 401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0057 ......... 155 City of Livermore, CA Construct Bus Facility for Livermore Amador 

Valley Transit Authority.

451,440 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0058 ......... 158 Covina, El Monte, Baldwin Park, Upland, CA Parking and Electronic 

Signage Improvements.

351,120 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0059 ......... 207 Culver City, CA Purchase compressed natural gas buses and expand 

natural gas fueling facility.

742,368 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0060 ......... 17 Davis, CA Davis Multi-Modal Station to improve entrance to Amtrak 

Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking and improve service.

200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0061 ......... 11 Development of Gold Country Stage Transit Transfer Center, Nevada 

County, CA.

186,659 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13918 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0062 ......... 339 East San Diego County, California-Bus Maintenance Facility Expansion.401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0063 ......... 101 Emeryville, CA Expand & Improve Inter-modal Transit Center at Amtrak Station.200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0064 ......... 222 Escondido, CA-Construct Bus Maintenance Facility .............................. 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0065 ......... 387 Fresno, CA–Develop program of low-emission transit vehicles ............ 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0066 ......... 260 Gardena, CA Purchase of alternative fuel buses for service expansion, on-board security system and bus facility training equipment.1,229,923 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0067 ......... 212 Glendale, CA Construction of Downtown Streetcar Project .................. 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0068 ......... 1 Glendale, CA Purchase of CNG Buses for Glendale Beeline Transit 

System.

92,696 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0069 ......... 414 Hercules, CA Inter-modal Rail Station Improvements ........................... 300,960 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0070 ......... 276 Long Beach, Ca Museum of Latin American Art, Long Beach, to build 

intermodal park and ride facility.

401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0071 ......... 332 Long Beach, CA Park and Ride Facility ................................................ 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0072 ......... 295 Long Beach, CA Purchase one larger (75 passengers) and two smaller (40 passengers) ferryboats and construct related dock work to 

facilitate the use and accessibility of the ferryboats.

601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0073 ......... 410 Long Beach, CA Purchase ten clean fuel buses ................................... 601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0074 ......... 443 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, CA capital funds 

for facility improvements to support the Cal State Northridge tram 

system.

65,208 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0075 ......... 140 Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw Bus Rapid Transit ..................................... 1,711,058 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0076 ......... 223 Los Angeles, CA Design and construct improved transit and pedestrian linkages between Los Angeles Community College and nearby 

MTA rail stop and bus lines.

300,960 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0077 ......... 307 Los Angeles, CA Improve safety, mobility and access between 

LATTC, Metro line and nearby bus stops on Grand Ave between 

Washington and 23rd.

100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0078 ......... 121 Los Angeles, CA Improve transit shelters, sidewalks lighting and landscaping around Cedar’s-Sinai Medical Center.300,960 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0079 ......... 326 Los Angeles, CA Install permanent irrigation system and enhanced 

landscaping on San Fernando Valley rapid bus transit way.

601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0080 ......... 36 Los Angeles, CA Wilshire-Vermont subway station reconstruction ....... 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0081 ......... 6 Los Angeles, CA, Construction of Intermodal Transit Center at California State University Los Angeles.158,506 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0082 ......... 567 Los Angeles, CA, Fly-Away Bus System Expansion ............................. 550,000 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0083 ......... 566 Los Angeles, CA, LAX Intermodal Transportation Center Rail and Bus 

System Expansion.

550,000 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0084 ......... 311 Mammoth Lakes, California-Regional Transit Maintenance Facility ...... 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0085 ......... 112 Mariposa, CA-Yosemite National Park CNG-Hydrogen transit buses 

and facilities.

501,600 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0086 ......... 266 Martinez, CA Inter-modal Facility Restoration ....................................... 300,960 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0087 ......... 285 Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Light Rail Transit Project from 

Pasadena, CA to Montclair, CA.

3,009,600 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0088 ......... 39 Monrovia, California-Transit Village Project ........................................... 601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0089 ......... 200 Montebello, CA Bus Lines Bus Fleet Replacement Project .................. 140,448 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0090 ......... 321 Monterey Park, CA Catch Basins at Transit Stop Installation ............... 64,205 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0091 ......... 191 Monterey Park, CA Safety improvements at a bus stop including creation of bus loading areas and street improvements.321,024 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0092 ......... 375 Monterey, CA Purchase bus equipment ................................................ 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0093 ......... 43 Needles, California-El Garces Intermodal Facility ................................. 401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0094 ......... 92 Norwalk, CA Transit System Bus Procurement and Los Angeles 

World Airport Remote Fly-Away Facility Project.

160,512 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0095 ......... 392 Oakland, CA Construct Bay Trail between Coliseum BART station 

and Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline.

180,576 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0096 ......... 352 Oakland, CA Construct streetscape & intermodal improvements at 

BART Station Transit Villages.

200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0097 ......... 173 Ontario, CA Construct Omnitrans Transcenter ...................................... 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0098 ......... 194 Orange County Transit Authority, California-Security surveillance and 

monitoring equipment.

1,061,386 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0099 ......... 244 Orange County, CA Purchase buses for rapid transit ........................... 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0100 ......... 366 Orange County, CA Transportation Projects to Encourage Use of 

Transit to Reduce Congestion.

200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0101 ......... 45 Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit bus purchase ........................ 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0102 ......... 70 Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit: CalStrat-Weststart fuel cell 

bus program.

200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0103 ......... 399 Pasadena, CA ITS Improvements .......................................................... 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0104 ......... 116 Pleasant Hill, CA Construct Diablo Valley College Bus Transit Center 300,960 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13919 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0105 ......... 251 Redondo Beach, CA Capital Equipment procurement of 12. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles for Coastal Shuttle 

Services by Beach Cities Transit.

160,512 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0106 ......... 286 Richmond, CA BART Parking Structure ................................................ 1,003,200 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0107 ......... 171 Riverside, California-RTA Advanced Traveler Information System ....... 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0108 ......... 189 Sacramento, CA Bus enhancement and improvements-construct 

maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service.

401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0109 ......... 84 Sacramento, CA Construct intermodal station and related improvements.1,404,480 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0110 ......... 253 San Bernardino, CA Implement Santa Fe Depot improvements in San 

Bernardino.

100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0111 ......... 282 San Diego, CA Completion of San Diego Joint Transportation Operations Center (JTOC).401,280 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0112 ......... 314 San Diego, CA Widen sidewalks and bus stop entrance, and provide 

diagonal parking, in the Skyline Paradise Hills neighborhood (Reo 

Drive).

60,192 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0113 ......... 183 San Fernando Valley, CA Reseda Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Route ....... 120,384 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0114 ......... 127 San Fernando, CA Purchase CNG buses and related equipment and 

construct facilities.

609,946 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0115 ......... 377 San Francisco, CA Construct San Francisco Muni Islais Creek Maintenance Facility.1,203,840 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0116 ......... 287 San Francisco, CA Implement ITS on Muni Transit System ................. 601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0117 ......... 403 San Francisco, CA Implement Transbay Terminal-Caltrain Downtown 

Extension Project.

2,808,960 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0118 ......... 381 San Francisco, CA Redesign and renovate intermodal facility at Glen 

Park Community.

827,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0119 ......... 341 San Gabriel Valley, CA-Foothill Transit Park and Rides ....................... 1,906,080 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0120 ......... 254 San Joaquin, California Regional Rail-Altamont Commuter Express 

Corridor inter-modal centers.

802,560 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0121 ......... 382 San Luis Ray, California-Transit Center Project .................................... 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0122 ......... 145 Santa Ana, CA Improve Santa Ana transit terminal .............................. 200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0123 ......... 147 Santa Barbara, CA-Expansion of Regional Intermodal Transit Center 60,192 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0124 ......... 364 Santa Monica, CA Construct intermodal park-and-ride facility at Santa 

Monica College campus on South Bundy Drive near Airport Avenue.

200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0125 ......... 172 Santa Monica, CA Purchase and service LNG buses for Santa 

Monica’s Big Blue Bus to meet increased ridership needs and reduce emissions.

752,400 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0126 ......... 313 Solana Beach, CA-Construct Intermodal Facility ................................... 300,960 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0127 ......... 27 Sonoma County, CA Purchase of CNG buses ...................................... 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0128 ......... 401 South Pasadena, CA Silent Night Grade Crossing Project ................... 180,576 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0129 ......... 383 South San Francisco, CA Construction of Ferry Terminal at Oyster 

Point in South San Francisco to the San Francisco Bay Water 

Transit Authority.

953,040 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0130 ......... 388 Sylmar, CA Los Angeles Mission College Transit Center construction 50,160 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0131 ......... 315 Temecula, California-Intermodal Transit Facility .................................... 100,320 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0132 ......... 85 Torrance Transit System, CA Acquisition of EPA and CARB-certified 

low emission replacement buses.

601,920 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0133 ......... 459 Transbay Terminal/ Caltrain Downtown Extension Project .................... 4,200,000 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0134 ......... 35 Union City, CA Inter-modal Station, Phase 1: Modify BART station ..... 852,720 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0135 ......... 195 Woodland Hills, CA Los Angeles Pierce College Bus Rapid Transit 

Station Extension.

200,640 

CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0136 ......... 83 Woodland, CA Yolobus operations, maintenance, administration facility expansion and improvements to increase bus service with alternative fuel buses.401,280 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0137 ......... 449 City of Aspen, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................. 140,448 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0138 ......... 448 City of Durango, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... 50,160 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0139 ......... 509 Colorado Association of Transit Agencies/Colorado Transit CoalitionColorado Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities.6,188,000 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0140 ......... 518 Denver Regional Transit District-Bus Maintenance Facility ................... 714,000 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0141 ......... 520 Denver Regional Transit District-Denver Union Station Multimodal 

Renovations.

476,000 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0142 ......... 521 Denver Regional Transit District-US 36 Corridor BRT .......................... 1,666,000 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0143 ......... 167 Denver, CO Denver Union Station Inter-modal Center ......................... 1,103,520 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0144 ......... 435 Denver, Colorado-Regional Transportation District Bus Replacement .. 401,280 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0145 ......... 441 Grand Valley Transit, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................................. 100,320 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0146 ......... 188 Mountain Express, Crested Butte, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .............. 100,320 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0147 ......... 444 Pueblo Transit, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................ 50,160 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0148 ......... 445 Roaring Fork Transit Authority, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................. 150,480 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0149 ......... 446 Steamboat Springs, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................................... 150,480 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13920 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0150 ......... 450 Town of Snowmass Village, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ....................... 60,192 

CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0151 ......... 447 Town of Telluride, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ....................................... 64,821 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0152 ......... 44 Bridgeport, Connecticut-Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority Bus Facility.100,320 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0153 ......... 478 Bridgeport, CT Facility Expansion/Improvement .................................... 400,000 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0154 ......... 90 Buses and bus related facilities throughout the State of Connecticut ... 1,203,840 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0155 ......... 523 Downtown Middletown, CT, Transportation Infrastructure Improvement 

Project.

2,150,000 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0156 ......... 218 Enfield, Connecticut-intermodal station .................................................. 601,920 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0157 ......... 394 Hartford, CT Buses and bus-related facilities ........................................ 802,560 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0158 ......... 267 Middletown, CT Construct intermodal center ......................................... 300,960 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0159 ......... 589 New Haven, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................ 2,150,000 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0160 ......... 269 New London, Connecticut-Intermodal Transportation Center and 

Streetscapes.

100,320 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0161 ......... 369 Norwalk, Connecticut-Pulse Point Joint Development inter-modal facility.100,320 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0162 ......... 131 Stonington and Mystic, Connecticut-Intermodal Center parking facility 

and Streetscape.

489,562 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0163 ......... 32 Torrington, CT Construct bus-related facility (Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit District).401,280 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0164 ......... 270 Vernon, Connecticut-Intermodal Center, Parking and Streetscapes ..... 1,524,846 

CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0165 ......... 657 Waterbury, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................... 2,300,000 

DE ............ E2007–BUSP–0166 ......... 169 Delaware-University of Delaware Fuel Cell Bus Deployment ................ 100,320 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0167 ......... 470 Bay County, FL - Transit Facility ............................................................ 476,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0168 ......... 297 Broward County, FL - Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities ..... 401,280 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0169 ......... 69 Broward County, FL Buses & Bus Facilities .......................................... 1,304,160 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0170 ......... 479 Broward County-Bus and Bus Facilities ................................................. 476,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0171 ......... 117 Broward, FL Purchase new articulated buses and bus stop improvements on State Road 7. (SR 7) between Golden Glades Interchange and Glades Road.100,320 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0172 ......... 439 Central Florida Commuter Rail intermodal facilities ............................... 1,003,200 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0173 ......... 453 Central Florida Commuter Rail Intermodal Facilities ............................. 720,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0174 ......... 488 Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority-LYNX Bus Fleet Expansion Program.1,190,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0175 ......... 498 City of Gainesville Regional Transit System-Facility Expansion ........... 238,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0176 ......... 508 Collier County Transit-Transit Facility .................................................... 238,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0177 ......... 23 Construct intermodal transportation & parking facility, City of Winter 

Park, Florida.

100,320 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0178 ......... 80 Flagler County, Florida-bus facility ......................................................... 120,384 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0179 ......... 527 Florida Department of Transportation-Palm Beach County Replacement Buses.238,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0180 ......... 344 Gainesville, FL Bus Facility Expansion .................................................. 802,560 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0181 ......... 213 Gainesville, FL Bus Rapid Transit Study ............................................... 100,320 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0182 ......... 95 Gainesville, FL Bus Replacement .......................................................... 802,560 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0183 ......... 538 Hillsborough Area Regional Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Improvements 476,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0184 ......... 539 Hillsborough, FL, Hillsborough Area regional Transit Authority ............. 1,000,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0185 ......... 548 Jacksonville Transportation Authority-Bus Fleet Replacement and 

Equipment.

1,190,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0186 ......... 306 Jacksonville, FL Bus Replacement ........................................................ 1,404,480 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0187 ......... 107 Jacksonville, FL Paratransit Vehicles ..................................................... 902,880 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0188 ......... 549 Jacksonville, FL Transportation Authority Paratransit Program ............. 0 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0189 ......... 558 Lakeland Area Mass Transit District/Citrus Connection-Capital Funding Needs.476,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0190 ......... 238 Levy County, Florida-Purchase 2. wheel chair equipped passenger 

buses and related equipment.

60,192 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0191 ......... 103 Longwood, Florida-Construct Intermodal Transportation Facility .......... 100,320 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0192 ......... 308 Miami Dade, FL N.W. 7th Avenue Transit Hub ..................................... 601,920 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0193 ......... 211 Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ............................ 1,203,840 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0194 ......... 432 Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ............................ 802,560 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0195 ......... 133 Miami-Dade County, Florida-Transit Security System ........................... 599,914 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0196 ......... 580 Miami-Dade Transit 7th Avenue NW Transit Hub ................................. 238,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0197 ......... 454 Miami-Dade Transit Dadeland South Intermodal Center ....................... 480,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0198 ......... 136 Ocala and Marion County, Florida-replacement buses ......................... 601,920 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0199 ......... 294 Orlando, FL Bus Replacement ............................................................... 802,560 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0200 ......... 14 Orlando, Florida-LYNX Bus Fleet Expansion Program .......................... 180,576 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0201 ......... 125 Palm Beach County, FL Plan and Construct Belle Glade Combined 

Passenger Transit Facility.

702,240 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0202 ......... 367 Palm Beach, FL 20 New Buses for Palm Tran ...................................... 300,960 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0203 ......... 248 Palm Beach, FL Palm Tran AVL–APC system with smart card fare 

boxes.

50,160 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13921 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0204 ......... 600 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization-Pinellas Mobility 

Initiative: BRT and Guide way.

238,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0205 ......... 415 Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL .... 451,440 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0206 ......... 420 Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL .... 401,280 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0207 ......... 400 South FL Region, FL Regional Universal Automated Fare Collection 

System (UAFC) (for bus system).

401,280 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0208 ......... 623 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Beach 

Intermodal Facility.

476,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0209 ......... 622 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Improvements, for any activity eligible under section 5309.3,570,000 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0210 ......... 31 St. Augustine, Florida-Intermodal Transportation Center and related 

pedestrian and landscape improvements.

200,640 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0211 ......... 390 St. Lucie County, FL Purchase Buses ................................................... 200,640 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0212 ......... 402 Tampa, FL Establish Transit Emphasis Corridor Project ....................... 150,480 

FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0213 ......... 148 Tampa, FL Purchase buses and construct bus facilities ....................... 451,440 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0214 ......... 355 Albany, GA Bus replacement ................................................................. 60,192 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0215 ......... 255 Albany, GA Multimodal Facility .............................................................. 160,512 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0216 ......... 357 Athens, GA Buses and Bus Facilities .................................................... 284,909 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0217 ......... 247 Atlanta, GA Inter-modal Passenger Facility Improvements ................... 401,280 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0218 ......... 384 Atlanta, GA MARTA Clean Fuel Bus Acquisition ................................... 1,203,840 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0219 ......... 144 Augusta, GA Buses and Bus Facilities .................................................. 80,256 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0220 ......... 110 Cobb County, GA Cobb County Smart Card Technology/ Bus Facility 

Improvements.

200,640 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0221 ......... 91 Columbus, GA Bus replacement ............................................................ 60,192 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0222 ......... 510 Columbus, Georgia/Phoenix City, Alabama-National Infantry Museum 

Multimodal Facility.

405,000 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0223 ......... 49 Columbus, Georgia-Buses & Bus Facilities ........................................... 194,420 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0224 ......... 530 Georgia Department of Transportation-Georgia Statewide Bus and 

Bus Facilities.

2,142,000 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0225 ......... 60 Georgia Statewide Bus Program ............................................................ 40,128 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0226 ......... 275 Jesup, Georgia-Train Depot intermodal center ...................................... 200,640 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0227 ......... 374 Metro-Atlanta, GA MARTA Automated Smart-Card Fare Collection 

System.

200,640 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0228 ......... 406 Moultrie, GA Inter-modal facility ............................................................. 60,192 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0229 ......... 329 Quitman, Clay, Randolph, Stewart Co., GA Bus project ....................... 50,160 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0230 ......... 256 Savannah, GA Bus and Bus Facilities-Chatham Area Transit .............. 1,003,200 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0231 ......... 348 Savannah, Georgia-Water Ferry River walk intermodal facilities .......... 401,280 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0232 ......... 206 Sylvester, GA Inter-modal Facility .......................................................... 40,128 

GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0233 ......... 298 Thomasville, GA Bus Replacement ....................................................... 40,128 

HI .............. E2007–BUSP–0234 ......... 540 Honolulu, HI, Bus Facilities .................................................................... 1,300,000 

IA .............. E2007–BUSP–0235 ......... 440 Ames, Iowa-Expansion of CyRide Bus Maintenance Facility ................ 401,280 

IA .............. E2007–BUSP–0236 ......... 475 Black Hawk County, IA UNI Multimodal Project .................................... 714,000 

IA .............. E2007–BUSP–0237 ......... 242 Des Moines, IA Purchase 40 foot buses ............................................... 200,640 

IA .............. E2007–BUSP–0238 ......... 545 Iowa Department of Transportation-Iowa Statewide Buses and Bus 

Replacement.

2,856,000 

ID .............. E2007–BUSP–0239 ......... 176 Boise, ID-Multimodal facility ................................................................... 902,880 

ID .............. E2007–BUSP–0240 ......... 543 Idaho Department of Transportation— Idaho Statewide ITS for Public 

Transportation.

357,000 

ID .............. E2007–BUSP–0241 ......... 652 Valley Regional Transit, ID–Downtown Boise Multimodal ..................... 1,381,000 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0242 ......... 433 Centralia, Illinois-South Central Mass Transit District Improvements .... 80,256 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0243 ......... 226 Champaign, IL-Construct park and ride lot with attached daycare facility.300,690 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0244 ......... 221 Chicago, IL Construct intermodal facility at 35th Street at Metra Ride 

Line (Northside).

1,003,200 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0245 ......... 219 Chicago, IL Feasibility Study for intermodal station on the Metra Rock 

Island near Kennedy-King College.

60,192 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0246 ......... 491 Chicago, IL, Cermak Road, Bus Rapid Transit ...................................... 250,000 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0247 ......... 358 Cicero, Chicago Establish Transit Signal Priority, Cicero Ave., Pace 

Suburban Bus.

200,640 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0248 ......... 4 Des Plaines, Wauconda, Cook and Lake Counties, IL Rand Road 

Transit Signal Priority.

160,512 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0249 ......... 296 Elgin to Rockford, Illinois-Intermodal stations along planned Metra 

Union Pacific West Line extension alignment, including necessary 

alternatives analysis.

100,320 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0250 ......... 114 Geneva, Illinois-Construct commuter parking deck for Metra Service .. 802,560 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0251 ......... 291 Joliet, Illinois-Union Station commuter parking facility ........................... 576,840 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0252 ......... 250 Maywood, IL Purchase buses ................................................................ 10,032 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0253 ......... 186 Mattoon, Illinois— historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center b 321,024 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0254 ......... 429 Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center ................................. 401,280 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13922 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0255 ......... 163 Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center, including facilities 

for adjacent public and nonprofit uses.

1,003,200 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0256 ......... 365 Pace Suburban Bus, IL South Suburban BRT Mobility Network ........... 100,320 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0257 ......... 404 Rock Island, IL Improve Rock Island Mass Transit District Bus Facility 100,320 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0258 ......... 608 Rock Island, Illinois, Metrolink Transit Maintenance Facility ................. 250,000 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0259 ......... 632 Springfield, IL, Multimodal Transit Terminal ........................................... 1,100,000 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0260 ......... 259 St. Charles, IL-Intermodal Parking Structures ....................................... 902,880 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0261 ......... 265 Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, 80th Avenue Commuter Rail Station reconstruction and site enhancements.160,512 

IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0262 ......... 135 Wheaton, IL Pace Suburban Bus-Purchase buses ............................... 200,640 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0263 ......... 109 Bloomington, IN-Bus and transfer facility ............................................... 965,078 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0264 ......... 529 Gary, Indiana, Gary Airport Station Modernization and Shuttle Service 

Project.

400,000 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0265 ......... 544 Indianapolis Downtown Transit Center .................................................. 900,000 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0266 ......... 235 Indianapolis, IN Construct the Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility.1,003,200 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0267 ......... 5 Indianapolis, IN Downtown Transit Center ............................................. 2,808,960 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0268 ......... 220 Indianapolis, IN IndySMART program to relieve congestion, improve 

safety and air quality.

401,280 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0269 ......... 378 Indianapolis, IN Relocate and improve inter-modal transportation for 

pedestrian to Children’s Museum of Indianapolis.

2,808,960 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0270 ......... 417 Indianapolis, Indiana-Children’s Museum Intermodal Center ................ 200,640 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0271 ......... 546 Ivy Tech State College, Indiana Multimodal Center .............................. 200,000 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0272 ......... 556 Lafayette, Indiana, City Bus of Greater Lafayette .................................. c 550,000 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0273 ......... 617 South Bend, Indiana, TRANSPO Bus Operations Center ..................... 900,000 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0274 ......... 141 South Bend, Indiana-Construct South Bend Bus Operations Center .... 200,640 

IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0275 ......... 637 Terre Haute, Indiana-Cherry Street Joint Development Project ............ 900,000 

KS ............ E2007–BUSP–0276 ......... 53 Johnson Co., KS Bus and bus related facilities [I–35. corridor], Johnson Co. Transit.401,280 

KS ............ E2007–BUSP–0277 ......... 551 Kansas City Area Transportation Authority-Bus Project ........................ 2,380,000 

KS ............ E2007–BUSP–0278 ......... 552 Kansas Department of Transportation-Kansas Statewide Transit 

Buses, Bus Facilities, and Bus ITS.

2,856,000 

KY ............ E2007–BUSP–0279 ......... 372 Richmond, KY Purchase buses, bus equipment and facilities .............. 144,461 

KY ............ E2007–BUSP–0280 ......... 639 Transit Authority of Lexington, KY-Rehabilitation of Building for Maintenance and Administration.952,000 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0281 ......... 484 Capital Area Transit System-Baton Rouge BRT .................................... 714,000 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0282 ......... 72 Hammond, Louisiana-Passenger Intermodal facility at Southeastern 

University.

40,128 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0283 ......... 555 Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, LA-Lafayette 

Multimodal Transportation Facility.

238,000 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0284 ......... 239 Lafayette, Louisiana-Lafayette Transit System bus replacement program.180,576 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0285 ......... 356 Lafayette, Louisiana-Multimodal center, Final Phase ............................ 601,920 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0286 ......... 568 Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development-Statewide 

Vehicles and Equipment.

238,000 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0287 ......... 170 Louisiana-Construct pedestrian walkways between Caddo St. and 

Milam St. along Edwards St. in Shreveport, LA.

203,640 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0288 ......... 55 New Orleans, LA Inter-modal Riverfront Center .................................... 100,320 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0289 ......... 67 New Orleans, LA Plan and construct New Orleans Union Passenger 

Terminal intermodal facilities.

200,640 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0290 ......... 243 New Orleans, LA Regional Planning Commission, bus and bus facilities.100,320 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0291 ......... 310 River Parishes, LA South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities.200,640 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0292 ......... 606 River Parishes, Louisiana, South Central Planning and Development 

Commission, bus and bus facilities.

180,000 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0293 ......... 277 Shreveport, LA-intermodal Transit Facility ............................................. 672,144 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0294 ......... 625 Southeastern Louisiana University Intermodal Facility .......................... 450,000 

LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0295 ......... 283 St. Bernard Parish, LA Intermodal facility improvements ...................... 200,640 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0296 ......... 118 Attleboro, MA Construction, engineering and site improvements at the 

Attleboro Intermodal Center.

401,280 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0297 ......... 472 Berkshire, MA, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bus Maintenance 

Facility.

30,000 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0298 ......... 59 Beverly, MA Design and Construct Beverly Deport Intermodal Transportation Center.401,280 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0299 ......... 273 Boston, MA Harbor Park Pavilion & Inter-modal Station ....................... 250,800 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0300 ......... 174 Brockton, MA Bus replacement for the Brockton Area Transit Authority.300,960 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0301 ......... 330 Framingham, MA Local Intra-Framingham Transit System enhancements.361,152 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13923 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0302 ......... 124 Haverhill, MA Design and Construct Inter-modal Transit Parking Improvements.1,123,584 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0303 ......... 21 Hingham, MA Higham Marine Intermodal Center Improvements: Enhance public transportation infrastructure/parking.1,805,760 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0304 ......... 563 Lawrence, MA, Gateway Intermodal and Quadant Area Reuse Project 800,000 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0305 ......... 280 Lowell, MA Implementation of LRTA bus replacement plan .................. 200,640 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0306 ......... 569 Lowell, MA, Lowell Regional Transit ...................................................... 800,000 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0307 ......... 42 Medford, MA Downtown revitalization featuring construction of a 200 

space Park and Ride Facility.

401,280 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0308 ......... 257 Newburyport, MA Design and Construct Intermodal Facility ................. 401,280 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0309 ......... 139 Quincy, MA MBTA Purchase high speed catamaran ferry for Quincy 

Harbor Express Service.

401,280 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0310 ......... 161 Revere, MA Inter-modal transit improvements in the Wonderland station (MBTA) area.361,152 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0311 ......... 88 Rockport, MA Rockport Commuter Rail Station Improvements ............ 551,760 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0312 ......... 370 Salem, MA Design and Construct Salem Intermodal Transportation 

Center.

401,280 

MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0313 ......... 205 Woburn, MA Construction of an 89 space park and ride facility to be 

located on Magazine Hill, in the Heart of Woburn Square.

361,152 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0314 ......... 122 Baltimore, MD Construct Intercity Bus Intermodal Terminal .................. 1,003,200 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0315 ......... 303 Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations 

and Maintenance Facility.

1,003,200 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0316 ......... 542 Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations 

and Maintenance Facility.

220,000 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0317 ......... 571 MARC Intermodal Odenton and Edgewood Station Improvements ...... 380,000 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0318 ......... 573 Maryland Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses ....................................... 5,750,000 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0319 ......... 224 Montgomery County, MD Wheaton CBD Intermodal Access Program 100,320 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0320 ......... 214 Mount Rainier, MD Intermodal and Pedestrian Project ......................... 90,288 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0321 ......... 615 Silver Spring, Maryland, Transit Center ................................................. 6,000,000 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0322 ......... 8 Silver Spring, MD Construct Silver Spring Transit Center in downtown 

Silver Spring.

732,336 

MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0323 ......... 629 Southern Maryland Commuter Initiative ................................................. 2,800,000 

ME ............ E2007–BUSP–0324 ......... 19 Bar Harbor, ME Purchase new buses to enhance commuting near the 

Jackson Labs.

60,192 

ME ............ E2007–BUSP–0325 ......... 483 Campobello Park, ME, Bus Acquisition ................................................. 34,000 

ME ............ E2007–BUSP–0326 ......... 570 Maine Department of Transportation-Acadia Intermodal Facility ........... 714,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0327 ......... 301 Barry County, MI-Barry County Transit equipments and dispatching 

software.

30,096 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0328 ......... 204 Boysville of Michigan Transportation System ........................................ 674,150 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0329 ......... 502 City of Kalamazoo, MI bus Replacement ............................................... 1,800,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0330 ......... 319 Detroit Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................................ 1,805,760 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0331 ......... 522 Detroit Department of Transportation Bus Replacement ....................... 2,100,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0332 ......... 2 Detroit Fare Collection System .............................................................. 802,560 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0333 ......... 156 Detroit Replacement Buses .................................................................... 1,003,200 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0334 ......... 320 Detroit, MI Bus Replacement ................................................................. 1,504,800 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0335 ......... 9 Detroit, MI Enclosed heavy-duty maintenance facility with full operational functions for up to 300 buses.902,880 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0336 ......... 208 Eastern Upper Peninsula, MI Ferry Dock and Facility upgrades for 

Drummond Island Ferry Services.

50,160 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0337 ......... 526 Flint, MI, Mass Transportation Authority Bus Maintenance Facility ....... 650,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0338 ......... 531 Grand Rapids, Michigan, The Rapid, Bus Replacement ....................... 1,100,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0339 ......... 249 Grand Rapids, MI-Purchase replacement and expansion buses .......... 2,939,376 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0340 ......... 79 Ionia County, MI-Purchase and Implementation of communication 

equipment improvements.

118,378 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0341 ......... 560 Lansing, MI, Capital Area Transportation Authority, Bus Replacement 

and Bus Related ITS.

850,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0342 ......... 572 Marquette County, Michigan Transit Authority Bus passenger facility .. 300,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0343 ......... 581 Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Bus Replacement ..... 2,200,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0344 ......... 293 Muskegon, Michigan-Muskegon Area Transit Terminal and related improvements.401,280 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0345 ......... 601 Port Huron, Michigan, Blue Water Area Transportation Commission, 

Bus Maintenance Facility.

1,250,000 

MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0346 ......... 634 Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) Bus 

Maintenance Facility.

1,750,000 

MN ............ E2007–BUSP–0347 ......... 40 Duluth, MN Downtown Duluth Area Transit facility improvements ........ 401,280 

MN ............ E2007–BUSP–0348 ......... 177 Fond du Lac Reservation, MN Purchase buses .................................... 30,096 

MN ............ E2007–BUSP–0349 ......... 577 Metro Transit/Metropolitan Council, MN-Bus/Bus Capital ...................... 2,261,000 

MN ............ E2007–BUSP–0350 ......... 185 St. Paul to Hinckley, MN Construct bus amenities along Rush Line 

Corridor.

300,960 

MN ............ E2007–BUSP–0351 ......... 342 St. Paul, MN Union Depot Multi Modal Transit Facility ......................... 401,280 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13924 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0352 ......... 473 Bi-State Development Agency-St. Louis Bridge Repair/Reconstruction, 

for any activity eligible under section 5309.

d 1,190,000 

MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0353 ......... 474 Bi-State Development Agency-St. Louis Metro Bus Fare Collection 

Program.

d 3,808,000 

MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0354 ......... 345 Kansas City, MO Bus Transit Infrastructure .......................................... 200,640 

MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0355 ......... 598 OATS, Incorporated, MO–ITS Information and Billing System and Bus 

Facilities.

4,046,000 

MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0356 ......... 624 Southeast Missouri Transportation Service-Bus Project ........................ 476,000 

MS ............ E2007–BUSP–0357 ......... 130 Coahoma County, Mississippi Purchase buses for the Aaron E. Henry 

Community Health Services Center, Inc./DARTS transit service.

30,096 

MS ............ E2007–BUSP–0358 ......... 547 Jackson State University, MS-Busing Project ........................................ 1,190,000 

MT ............ E2007–BUSP–0359 ......... 129 Bozeman, Montana-Vehicular Parking Facility ...................................... 802,560 

MT ............ E2007–BUSP–0360 ......... 476 Bozeman, MT, Intermodal and parking facility ....................................... 171,000 

MT ............ E2007–BUSP–0361 ......... 584 Montana Department of Transportation-Statewide Bus Facilities and 

Buses.

714,000 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0362 ......... 490 Charlotte Area Transit System/City of Charlotte-Charlotte Multimodal 

Station.

2,380,000 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0363 ......... 217 Charlotte, NC Construct Charlotte Multimodal Station .......................... 1,564,992 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0364 ......... 351 Charlotte, North Carolina-Eastland Community Transit Center ............. 401,280 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0365 ......... 228 Charlotte, North Carolina-Multimodal Station ......................................... 802,560 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0366 ......... 154 City of Greenville, NC Expansion Buses and Greenville Intermodal 

Center.

715,081 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0367 ......... 324 Elon, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation 

buses and bus facilities.

240,768 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0368 ......... 302 Greensboro, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation Multimodal Transportation Center.2,512,013 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0369 ......... 52 Greensboro, North Carolina-Replacement buses .................................. e 1,159,699 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0370 ......... 537 High Point, NC-Intermodal Facility ......................................................... 286,000 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0371 ......... 335 High Point, North Carolina-Bus Terminal ............................................... 1,203,840 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0372 ......... 594 North Carolina Department of Transportation-North Carolina Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities.

5,950,000 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0373 ......... 143 Raleigh, NC Purchase eighteen replacement buses to replace buses 

that have reached their useful life according to Federal Transit Administration regulations.

401,280 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0374 ......... 134 Town of Chapel Hill, NC Park and Ride Lot .......................................... 300,960 

NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0375 ......... 57 Wilmington, NC Build Intermodal Center ............................................... 200,640 

ND ............ E2007–BUSP–0376 ......... 595 North Dakota Department of Transportation/Statewide Bus .................. 1,100,000 

NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0377 ......... 505 City of Omaha-Creighton University Intermodal Facility ........................ 714,000 

NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0378 ......... 160 Kearney, Nebraska-RYDE Transit Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility.401,280 

NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0379 ......... 586 Nebraska Department of Roads-Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility for RYDE in Kearney, NE.476,000 

NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0380 ......... 587 Nebraska Department of Roads-Statewide Vehicles, Facilities, and 

Related Equipment Purchases.

952,000 

NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0381 ......... 240 Nebraska-statewide transit vehicles, facilities, and related equipment 802,560 

NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0382 ......... 599 Omaha, NE, Buses and Fare boxes ...................................................... 650,000 

NH ............ E2007–BUSP–0383 ......... 418 Windham, New Hampshire—Construction of Park and Ride Bus facility at Exit 3.742,368 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0384 ......... 468 Atlantic City, NJ Jitney ........................................................................... 750,000 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0385 ......... 86 Burlington County, NJ-BurLink and Burlington County Transportation 

System vehicles and equipment.

802,560 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0386 ......... 28 Camden, NJ Construction of the Camden County Intermodal Facility 

in Cramer Hill.

200,640 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0387 ......... 12 Hoboken, NJ Rehabilitation of Hoboken Inter-modal Terminal ............. 762,432 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0388 ......... 102 Jersey City, NJ Construct West Entrance to Pavonia-Newport PATH 

Station.

401,280 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0389 ......... 389 Lakewood, NJ-Ocean County Bus service and parking facilities .......... 601,920 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0390 ......... 138 Long Branch, NJ Design and construct facilities for ferry service from 

Long Branch, NJ to New York City and other destinations.

802,560 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0391 ......... 38 Monmouth County, NJ Construction of main bus facility for Freehold 

Township, including a terminal and repair shop.

401,280 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0392 ......... 209 Morristown, New Jersey-Intermodal Historic Station ............................. 200,640 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0393 ......... 46 National Park Service Design and construct 2.1-mile segment to complete Sandy Hook multiuse pathway in Sandy Hook, NJ.200,640 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0394 ......... 340 New Jersey Inter-modal Facilities and Bus Rolling Stock ..................... 601,920 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0395 ......... 328 New Jersey Transit Community Shuttle Buses ...................................... 100,320 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0396 ......... 13 Newark, NJ Penn Station Intermodal Improvements including the rehabilitation of boarding areas.200,640 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0397 ......... 29 Sandy Hook, NJ National Park Service Construct year-round ferry 

dock at Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area.

200,640 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13925 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0398 ......... 393 South Amboy, NJ Construction of improvements to facilities at South 

Amboy Station under S Amboy, NJ Regional Intermodal Initiative.

1,605,120 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0399 ......... 618 South Brunswick, NJ Transit System ..................................................... 1,000,000 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0400 ......... 643 Trenton Intermodal Station ..................................................................... 4,250,000 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0401 ......... 61 Trenton, New Jersey-Trenton Train Station Rehabilitation .................... 300,960 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0402 ......... 181 Trenton, NJ Development of Trenton Trolley System ........................... 200,640 

NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0403 ......... 62 Trenton, NJ Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Trenton Train 

Station.

1,404,480 

NM ............ E2007–BUSP–0404 ......... 464 Albuquerque, NM, Ride Bus and Bus Facilities ..................................... 1,500,000 

NM ............ E2007–BUSP–0405 ......... 562 Las Cruces, NM, Road Runner Bus and Bus Facilities ......................... 250,000 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0406 ......... 405 Las Vegas, NV Construct Boulder Highway BRT system and purchase vehicles and related equipment.401,280 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0407 ......... 199 Las Vegas, NV Construct Central City Inter-modal Transportation Terminal.1,203,840 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0408 ......... 371 Las Vegas, NV Construct Las Vegas West Care Intermodal Facility ... 50,160 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0409 ......... 603 Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada-Central City 

Intermodal Transportation Terminal.

952,000 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0410 ......... 18 Reno-Sparks, Nevada-Intermodal Transportation Terminals and Related Development.802,560 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0411 ......... 630 Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Public Transit Building Acquisition 300,000 

NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0412 ......... 656 Washoe County, NV Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... 1,500,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0413 ......... 74 Albany-Schenectady, NY Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY 

Route 5. Corridor.

200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0414 ......... 463 Albany-Schenectady, NY, Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY 

Route 5.

800,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0415 ......... 271 Bronx, NY Botanical Garden metro North Rail station Intermodal Facility.200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0416 ......... 20 Bronx, NY Establish an intermodal transportation facility at the Wildlife 

Conservation Society Bronx Zoo.

200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0417 ......... 279 Bronx, NY Establish an intermodal transportation facility at the Wildlife 

Conservation Society Bronx Zoo.

200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0418 ......... 166 Bronx, NY Hebrew Home for the Aged elderly and disabled transportation support.37,620 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0419 ......... 338 Bronx, NY Intermodal Facility near Exit 6. of the Bronx River Parkway 50,160 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0420 ......... 234 Bronx, NY Jacobi Intermodal Center to North Central Bronx Hospital 

bus system.

62,700 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0421 ......... 10 Bronx, NY Wildlife Conservation Society intermodal transportation facility at the Bronx Zoo.87,780 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0422 ......... 197 Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ................. 280,896 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0423 ......... 408 Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility in the vicinity of Downstate Medical Center.200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0424 ......... 41 Brooklyn, NY New Urban Center-Broadway Junction Intermodal Center.192,614 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0425 ......... 56 Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station 802,560 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0426 ......... 419 Brooklyn, NY—Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station.802,560 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0427 ......... 192 Buffalo, NY Inter-modal Center Parking Facility .................................... 200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0428 ......... 245 Bus to provide York-town, New York internal circulator to provide 

transportation throughout the Town.

37,118 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0429 ......... 230 Construction of Third Bus Depot on Staten Island ................................ 2,407,680 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0430 ......... 146 Cooperstown, New York-Intermodal Transit Center .............................. 1,003,200 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0431 ......... 363 Corning, New York-Transportation Center ............................................. 1,003,200 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0432 ......... 512 Corning, NY, Phase II Corning Preserve Transportation Enhancement 

Project.

450,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0433 ......... 284 Cornwall, NY-Purchase Bus ................................................................... 17,456 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0434 ......... 300 Geneva, New York-Multimodal facility-Construct passenger rail center 100,320 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0435 ......... 317 Jamestown, NY Rehabilitation of Intermodal Facility and associated 

property.

401,280 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0436 ......... 343 Kings County, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ......... 200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0437 ......... 368 Nassau County, NY Conduct planning and engineering for transportation system (HUB).1,404,480 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0438 ......... 585 Nassau County, NY, Conduct planning, engineering, and construction 

for transportation system (HUB).

1,200,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0439 ......... 25 New York City, NY First Phase Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit 

System.

200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0440 ......... 376 New York City, NY Purchase Handicapped-Accessible Livery Vehicles 220,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0441 ......... 590 New York City, NY, Bronx Zoo Intermodal Facility ................................ 450,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0442 ......... 591 New York City, NY, Enhance Transportation Facilities Near W. 65th 

Street and Broadway.

450,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13926 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0443 ......... 592 New York City, NY, Highline Project, for Studies, Design, and Construction.1,200,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0444 ......... 593 New York, Improvements to Moynihan Station ...................................... 1,200,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0445 ......... 77 Niagara Falls, NY Relocation, Development, and Enhancement of Niagara Falls International Railway Station/Intermodal Transportation 

Center.

1,123,584 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0446 ......... 373 Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, NY Replacement Buses ..... 200,640 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0447 ......... 322 Oneonta, New York-bus replacement .................................................... 30,096 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0448 ......... 379 Ramapo, NY Transportation Safety Field Bus ....................................... 50,160 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0449 ......... 252 Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square transit center .................... 902,880 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0450 ......... 430 Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square Transit Center .................. 451,440 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0451 ......... 607 Rochester, NY, Renaissance Square Intermodal Facility, Design and 

Construction.

1,400,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0452 ......... 609 Rockland County, NY Express Bus ....................................................... 700,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0453 ......... 386 Suffolk County, NY Design and construction of intermodal transit facility in Wyandanch.922,944 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0454 ......... 353 Suffolk County, NY Purchase four handicapped accessible vans to 

transport veterans to and from the VA facility in Northport.

56,179 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0455 ......... 635 Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University Connective Corridor Transit 

Project.

950,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0456 ......... 261 Thendra-Webb and Utica, New York-Install handicap lifts in intermodal centers.20,064 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0457 ......... 289 Town of Warwick, NY Bus Facility Warwick Transit System ................. 110,352 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0458 ......... 451 Utica, New York Transit Multimodal Facilities ........................................ 1,200,000 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0459 ......... 78 Utica, New York-Union Station Boehlert Center siding track improvements.20,064 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0460 ......... 182 Utica, New York-Union Station rehabilitation and related infrastructure 

improvements.

100,320 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0461 ......... 264 Westchester County, NY Bus replacement program ............................. 752,400 

NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0462 ......... 149 Yonkers, NY Trolley Bus Acquisition ..................................................... 75,240 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0463 ......... 362 Akron, OH Construct City of Akron Commuter Bus Transit Facility ...... 300,960 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0464 ......... 318 Akron, Ohio Construct Downtown Multi-modal Transportation Center .. 802,560 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0465 ......... 105 Akron, Ohio-West Market Street transit center and related pedestrian 

improvements.

130,416 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0466 ......... 489 Central Ohio Transit Authority-Paratransit and Small Bus Service Facility.476,000 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0467 ......... 241 Cincinnati, Ohio-Construct Uptown Crossings Joint Development 

Transit Project.

601,920 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0468 ......... 89 Cincinnati, Ohio-Metro Regional Transit Hub Network Eastern Neighborhoods.185,592 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0469 ......... 327 Cleveland, OH Construct East Side Transit Center ............................... 601,920 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0470 ......... 202 Cleveland, OH Construct Fare Collection System Project, Cuyahoga 

County.

100,320 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0471 ......... 179 Cleveland, OH Construct passenger inter-modal center near Dock 32 172,550 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0472 ......... 411 Cleveland, OH Construction of an inter-modal facility and related improvements at University Hospitals facility on Euclid Avenue.200,640 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0473 ......... 51 Cleveland, Ohio acquisition of buses Greater Cleveland Regional 

Transit Authority.

200,640 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0474 ......... 258 Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue and East 93rd Street intermodal facility.1,705,440 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0475 ......... 198 Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue University Hospital intermodal facility 902,880 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0476 ......... 50 Cleveland, Ohio-University Circle Intermodal facility ............................. 1,705,440 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0477 ......... 380 Columbiana County, OH Construct Inter-modal Facility ........................ 1,003,200 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0478 ......... 7 Columbus, OH-Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ........ 1,203,840 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0479 ......... 292 Cuyahoga County, Ohio-Ohio Department of Transportation transit improvements.30,096 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0480 ......... 120 Dayton Airport Inter-modal Rail Feasibility Study .................................. 150,480 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0481 ......... 516 Dayton-Wright Stop Plaza ...................................................................... 476,000 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0482 ......... 347 Eastlake, Ohio-Eastlake Stadium transit intermodal facility ................... 852,720 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0483 ......... 309 Elyria, OH Construct the New York Central Train Station into an intermodal transportation hub.410,911 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0484 ......... 349 Kent, OH Construct Kent State University Intermodal Facility serving 

students and the general public.

200,640 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0485 ......... 104 Marietta, Ohio Construction of transportation hub to accommodate regional bus traffic.100,320 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0486 ......... 576 Metro Regional Transit Authority/City of Akron-Downtown Transit Center/Akron.1,666,000 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0487 ......... 87 Niles, OH Acquisition of bus operational and service equipment of 

Niles Trumbull Transit.

40,128 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13927 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0488 ......... 385 Springfield, OH-City of Springfield Bus Transfer Station and Associated Parking.50,160 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0489 ......... 34 Toledo, OH TARTA/TARPS Passenger Inter-modal Facility construction.1,504,800 

OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0490 ......... 64 Zanesville, OH-bus system signage and shelters .................................. 16,302 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0491 ......... 442 Albany, OR North Albany Park and Ride ............................................... 191,086 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0492 ......... 165 Albany, OR Rehabilitate Building At Multimodal Transit Station ........... 305,737 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0493 ......... 272 Bend, Oregon-replacement vans ........................................................... 200,640 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0494 ......... 66 Canby, OR bus and bus facilities ........................................................... 30,096 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0495 ......... 187 Columbia County, OR To purchase buses ............................................ 28,090 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0496 ......... 299 Corvallis, OR Bus Replacement ............................................................. 296,183 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0497 ......... 159 Eugene, OR Lane Transit District, Vehicle Replacement ...................... 716,571 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0498 ......... 325 Grants Pass, OR Purchase Vehicles For Use By Josephine Community Transit.40,845 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0499 ......... 99 Gresham, Oregon Construct a new light rail station and transit plaza 

on Portland MAX system and serve Gresham Civic neighborhood.

280,896 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0500 ......... 168 Lane Transit District, Bus Rapid Transit Progressive Corridor Enhancements.594,621 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0501 ......... 323 Lincoln, County, OR bus purchase ........................................................ 50,160 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0502 ......... 175 Molalla, OR South Clackamas Transportation District, bus purchase ... 20,064 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0503 ......... 16 Portland, OR Renovation of Union Station, including structural reinforcement and public safety upgrades.20,064 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0504 ......... 93 Salem, OR bus and bus facilities ........................................................... 401,280 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0505 ......... 106 Sandy, Oregon Transit Bus Facility ....................................................... 140,448 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0506 ......... 180 Tillamook, OR construction of a transit facility ....................................... 20,064 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0507 ......... 216 Wilsonville, OR South Metro Area Rapid Transit, bus and bus facilities 50,160 

OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0508 ......... 82 Yamhill County, OR For the construction of bus shelters, park and 

ride facilities, and a signage strategy to increase ridership.

22,070 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0509 ......... 225 Allentown, Pennsylvania-Design and Construct Intermodal Transportation Center.401,280 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0510 ......... 456 Altoona Multimodal Transportation Facility Parking Garage .................. 240,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0511 ......... 465 AMTRAN Altoona, PA-Buses and Transit System Improvements ........ 714,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0512 ......... 467 Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania-Vehicle 

Replacements.

238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0513 ......... 471 Beaver County, PA Transit Authority Bus Replacement/ Related 

Equipment Replacement.

238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0514 ......... 481 Butler Township, PA-Cranbury Area Transit Service ............................. 833,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0515 ......... 428 Butler, PA-Multimodal Transit Center Construction ............................... 200,640 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0516 ......... 482 Cambria County, PA Transit Authority-Bus Replacements ................... 714,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0517 ......... 123 Cheltenham, PA Glenside Rail Station Parking Garage project involving the construction of a 300–400 space parking lot at Easton Road 

and Glenside Avenue.

200,640 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0518 ......... 500 City of Hazleton, PA-Hazleton Intermodal Center ................................. 333,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0519 ......... 513 County of Lackawanna Transit System-Scranton Intermodal Transportation Center.238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0520 ......... 514 Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority-Purchase of Buses 

and Spare Units.

238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0521 ......... 81 Easton, Pennsylvania-Design and construct Intermodal Transportation 

Center.

401,280 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0522 ......... 524 Erie, PA Metropolitan Transit Authority-Bus Acquisitions ...................... 238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0523 ......... 431 Erie, PA–EMTA Vehicle Acquisition ....................................................... 401,280 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0524 ......... 331 Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-transit transfer center ................................... 180,375 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0525 ......... 458 Hershey, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Garage ........... 60,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0526 ......... 233 Intermodal Facilities in Bucks County (Croydon and Levittown Stations).601,920 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0527 ......... 457 Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Facility.60,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0528 ......... 37 Lancaster, PA-bus replacement ............................................................. 190,608 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0529 ......... 559 Lancaster, PA-Intermodal Project .......................................................... 167,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0530 ......... 564 Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority, PA-Allentown Intermodal Transportation Center.476,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0531 ......... 583 Monroe Township, PA-Clarion County Buses ........................................ 157,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0532 ......... 588 New Castle, PA Area Transit Authority-Bus Purchases/Park and Ride 

Facility.

176,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0533 ......... 201 Philadelphia, PA Cruise Terminal Transportation Ctr. Phila. Naval 

Shipyard.

702,240 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0534 ......... 137 Philadelphia, PA Improvements to the existing Penn’s Landing Ferry 

Terminal.

802,560 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0535 ......... 413 Philadelphia, PA Penn’s Landing water shuttle parking lot expansion 

and water shuttle ramp infrastructure construction.

220,704 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13928 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0536 ......... 22 Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Zoo Intermodal Transportation project 

w/parking consolidation, pedestrian walkways, public transportation 

complements & landscape improvements to surface parking lots.

1,003,200 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0537 ......... 274 Philadelphia, PA SEPTA’s Market St. Elevated Rail project in conjunction with Philadelphia Commercial Development Corporation for improvements and assistance to entities along rail corridor.280,896 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0538 ......... 316 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-SEPTA Market Street Elevated Line parking facility.802,560 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0539 ......... 126 Pittsburgh, PA Clean Fuel Bus Procurement ......................................... 100,320 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0540 ......... 397 Pottsville, PA Union Street Trade and Transfer Center Intermodal Facility.401,280 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0541 ......... 48 Project provides for the engineering and construction of a transportation center in Paoli, Chester County.200,640 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0542 ......... 96 SEPTA Montgomery County Intermodal Improvements at Glenside 

and Jenkintown Station Parking Garages.

a 1,003,200 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0543 ......... 424 Sharon, PA–Bus Facility Construction ................................................... 100,320 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0544 ......... 626 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Bucks County 

Intermodal (Croydon and Levittown).

714,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0545 ......... 627 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Paoli Transportation Center.714,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0546 ......... 628 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Villanova-SEPTA 

Intermodal.

714,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0547 ......... 642 Transit Authority of Warren County, PA-Impact Warren ........................ 238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0548 ......... 33 Warren, PA-Construct Intermodal Transportation Center and related 

pedestrian and landscape improvements.

300,960 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0549 ......... 660 Westmoreland County Transit Authority, PA-Bus Replacement ............ 238,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0550 ......... 661 Wilkes-Barre Intermodal Facility ............................................................. 1,428,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0551 ......... 662 Williamsport, PA Bureau of Transportation-Williamsport Trade and 

Transit Centre Expansion.

714,000 

PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0552 ......... 65 York, Pennsylvania-Rabbit Transit facilities and communications 

equipment.

555,873 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0553 ......... 128 Bayamon, Puerto Rico-bus terminal ...................................................... 120,384 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0554 ......... 421 Bayamon, Puerto Rico-Purchase of Trolley Cars .................................. 170,544 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0555 ......... 3 Lares, PR-Trolley buses-for the purchase of two trolley buses that will 

offer transportation through the urban zone in the Municipality of 

Lares.

52,969 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0556 ......... 164 Puerto Rico-Caribbean National Forest buses and nonprofit uses ....... 601,920 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0557 ......... 152 San Juan, Puerto Rico-bus security equipment ..................................... 601,920 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0558 ......... 71 San Juan, Puerto Rico-Buses ................................................................ 200,640 

PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0559 ......... 58 Yabucoca, Puerto Rico-Trolley Buses ................................................... 35,112 

RI .............. E2007–BUSP–0560 ......... 246 Providence, RI Expansion of Elmwood Paratransit Maintenance Facility.1,003,200 

RI .............. E2007–BUSP–0561 ......... 604 Rhode Island, RIPTA Elmwood Facility Expansion ............................... 1,700,000 

RI .............. E2007–BUSP–0562 ......... 115 Rhode Island Statewide Bus Fleet ......................................................... 1,203,840 

SC ............ E2007–BUSP–0563 ......... 533 Greensville, SC Transit Authority-City of Greenville Multimodal Transportation Center Improvements.238,000 

SC ............ E2007–BUSP–0564 ......... 619 South Carolina Department of Transportation-Transit Facilities Construction Program.476,000 

SC ............ E2007–BUSP–0565 ......... 620 South Carolina Department of Transportation-Vehicle Acquisition Program.1,904,000 

SD ............ E2007–BUSP–0566 ......... 621 South Dakota Department of Transportation-Statewide Buses and Bus 

Facilities.

3,452,000 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0567 ......... 237 Knoxville, Tennessee-Central Station Transit Center ............................ 2,046,528 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0568 ......... 554 Knoxville, TN-Central Station ................................................................. 595,000 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0569 ......... 565 Lipscomb University, TN-Intermodal Parking Garage ............................ 357,000 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0570 ......... 579 Metropolitan Transit Authority-Nashville Downtown Transit Transfer 

Facility.

2,856,000 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0571 ......... 268 Nashville, TN Construct a parking garage on the campus of Lipscomb 

University, Nashville.

401,280 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0572 ......... 412 Nashville, TN Construct Downtown Nashville Transit Transfer Facility 300,960 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0573 ......... 30 Sevier County, Tennessee-U.S. 441 bus rapid transit .......................... 50,160 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0574 ......... 636 Tennessee Department of Transportation-Statewide Tennessee Transit ITS and Bus Replacement Project.2,856,000 

TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0575 ......... 649 University of Memphis-Pedestrian Bridge .............................................. 714,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0576 ......... 426 Abilene, TX Vehicle replacement and facility improvements for transit 

system.

80,256 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0577 ......... 480 Brownsville Urban System, TX—City-Wide Transit Improvement 

Project.

952,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0578 ......... 162 Brownsville, TX Brownsville Urban System City-Wide Transit Improvement Project.501,600 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13929 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0579 ......... 153 Bryan, TX The District-Bryan Intermodal Transit Terminal and Parking 

Facility.

601,920 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0580 ......... 485 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, TX-Bus Replacements 2,380,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0581 ......... 455 Carrollton, Texas Downtown Regional Multimodal Transit Hub ............ 240,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0582 ......... 506 City of Round Rock, TX-Downtown Intermodal Transportation Terminal.238,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0583 ......... 111 Construct West Houston and Fort Bend County, Texas-bus transit 

corridor.

401,280 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0584 ......... 438 Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Regional Transit Authority for maintenance 

facility improvements.

501,600 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0585 ......... 515 Dallas Area Rapid Transit-Bus passenger Facilities .............................. 238,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0586 ......... 336 Dallas, TX Bus Passenger Facilities ...................................................... 2,568,192 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0587 ......... 196 Design Downtown Carrollton, Texas Regional Multi-Modal Transit Hub 

Station.

401,280 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0588 ......... 290 Galveston, Texas-Intermodal center and parking facility, The Strand ... 902,880 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0589 ......... 536 Harris County-West Houston-Fort Bend Bus Transit Corridor: Uptown 

Westpark Terminal.

238,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0590 ......... 561 Laredo-North Laredo Transit Hub-Bus Maintenance Facility ................. 714,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0591 ......... 24 Roma, TX Bus Facility ............................................................................ 105,336 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0592 ......... 610 San Angelo, TX Street Railroad Company-Transit Fleet Replacement 238,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0593 ......... 210 San Antonio, TX Improve VIA bus facility and purchase new buses .... 1,404,480 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0594 ......... 653 VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority, TX-Bus & Bus Facility Improvements.1,190,000 

TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0595 ......... 63 Zapata, Texas Purchase Bus vehicles ................................................... 62,700 

UT ............ E2007–BUSP–0596 ......... 178 Sandy City, UT Construct transit hub station and TRAX station at 

9400 South.

401,280 

UT ............ E2007–BUSP–0597 ......... 651 Utah Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities .................................................. 7,148,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0598 ......... 409 Alexandria, VA Eisenhower Avenue Intermodal Station improvements, 

including purchase of buses and construction of bus shelters.

501,600 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0599 ......... 232 Alexandria, VA Royal Street Bus Garage Replacement ........................ 100,320 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0600 ......... 278 Arlington County, VA Columbia Pike Bus Improvements ...................... 702,240 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0601 ......... 142 Arlington County, VA Crystal City-Potomac Yard Busway, including 

construction of bus shelters.

601,920 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0602 ......... 359 Arlington County, VA Pentagon City Multimodal Improvements ........... 401,280 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0603 ......... 157 Bealeton, Virginia-Intermodal Station Depot Refurbishment ................. 55,176 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0604 ......... 492 City of Alexandria, VA-City-Wide Transit Improvements ....................... 238,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0605 ......... 493 City of Alexandria, VA-Potomac Yard Transit Improvements ................ 238,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0606 ......... 494 City of Alexandria, VA-Replace Royal Street Bus Garage .................... 714,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0607 ......... 495 City of Alexandria, VA-Valley Pedestrian & Transit ............................... 238,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0608 ......... 511 Commonwealth of Virginia-Statewide Bus Capital Program .................. 3,570,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0609 ......... 15 Fairfax County, VA Richmond Highway (U.S. Route 1) Public Transportation Improvements.401,280 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0610 ......... 525 Fairfax County, Virginia-Richmond Highway Initiative ........................... 476,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0611 ......... 281 Falls Church, VA Falls Church Intermodal Transportation Center ........ 401,280 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0612 ......... 97 Fredericksburg, Virginia-Improve and repair Fredericksburg Station .... 501,600 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0613 ......... 532 Greater Richmond Transit, VA-Bus Operations/Maintenance Facility ... 1,190,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0614 ......... 535 Hampton Roads Transit, VA-Southside Bus Facility ............................. 238,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0615 ......... 391 Hampton Roads, VA Final design and construction for a Hampton 

Roads Transit Southside Bus Facility.

401,280 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0616 ......... 354 Norfolk, Virginia-Final Design and Construction Southside Bus Facility 351,120 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0617 ......... 68 Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula, Virginia-Bay Transit Multimodal 

Facilities.

652,080 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0618 ......... 602 Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, VA-Buses for 

Service Expansion.

238,000 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0619 ......... 360 Richmond, VA Design and construction for a bus operations and 

maintenance facility for Greater Richmond Transit Company.

300,960 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0620 ......... 184 Richmond, VA Renovation and construction for Main Street Station .... 220,704 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0621 ......... 434 Roanoke, VA-Bus restoration in the City of Roanoke ........................... 50,160 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0622 ......... 312 Roanoke, Virginia-Improve Virginian Railway Station ............................ 50,160 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0623 ......... 305 Roanoke, Virginia-Intermodal Facility ..................................................... 40,128 

VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0624 ......... 361 Roanoke, Virginia-Roanoke Railway and Link Passenger facility ......... 100,320 

VT ............. E2007–BUSP–0625 ......... 477 Brattleborough, VT, Intermodal Center .................................................. 200,000 

VT ............. E2007–BUSP–0626 ......... 486 CCTA, VT, Bus, Facilities and Equipment ............................................. 400,000 

VT ............. E2007–BUSP–0627 ......... 633 State of Vermont Buses, Facilities and Equipment ............................... 350,000 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0628 ......... 94 Ilwaco, WA Procure shuttles for Lewis and Clark National Historical 

Park.

20,064 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0629 ......... 395 Ilwaco, WA Construct park and ride ...................................................... 20,064 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0630 ......... 337 Island Transit, WA Operations Base Facilities Project .......................... 481,536 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0631 ......... 193 Mukilteo, WA Multi-Modal Terminal ....................................................... 1,163,712 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0632 ......... 334 North Bend, Washington-Park and Ride ................................................ 160,512 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13930 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU 

Project No. 

Project description Allocation 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0633 ......... 333 Oak Harbor, WA Multimodal Facility ...................................................... 200,640 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0634 ......... 613 Seattle, WA Multimodal Terminal Redevelopment & Expansion ........... 900,000 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0635 ......... 113 Snohomish County, WA Community Transit bus purchases and facility 

enhancement.

601,920 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0636 ......... 151 Thurston County, WA Replace Thurston County Buses ....................... 180,576 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0637 ......... 654 Washington Southworth Terminal Redevelopment ................................ 1,150,000 

WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0638 ......... 655 Washington, King Street Transportation Center-Intercity Bus Terminal 

Component.

60,000 

WI ............. E2007–BUSP–0639 ......... 350 Milwaukee, WI Rehabilitate Intermodal transportation facility at downtown Milwaukee’s Amtrak Station, increase parking for bus passengers.902,880 

WI ............. E2007–BUSP–0640 ......... 100 State of Wisconsin buses and bus facilities ........................................... 3,280,464 

WI ............. E2007–BUSP–0641 ......... 452 State of Wisconsin Transit Intermodal Facilities .................................... 1,200,000 

WI ............. E2007–BUSP–0642 ......... 663 Wisconsin, Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities .................................... 610,000 

WV ........... E2007–BUSP–0643 ......... 73 West Virginia Construct Beckley Intermodal Gateway pursuant to the 

eligibility provisions for projects listed under section 3030(d)(3) of 

P.L. 105–178.

4,815,360 

WV ........... E2007–BUSP–0644 ......... 658 West Virginia, Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities ................................... 5,000,000 

WY ........... E2007–BUSP–0645 ......... 665 Wyoming Department of Transportation-Wyoming Statewide Bus and 

Bus Related Facilities.

714,000 

Subtotal ........................................................................................... 435,170,089 

Ferry Boat Systems Projects: 

CA ..... E2007–BUSP–0646 ......... .................. San Francisco Water Transit Authority .................................................. 2,500,000

MA ..... E2007–BUSP–0647 ......... .................. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ferry System .................. 2,500,000 

ME ..... E2007–BUSP–0648 ......... .................. Maine State Ferry Service, Rockland .................................................... 650,000 

ME ..... E2007–BUSP–0649 ......... .................. Swans Island, Maine Ferry Service ....................................................... 350,000 

NJ ...... E2007–BUSP–0650 ......... .................. Camden, New Jersey Ferry System ...................................................... 1,000,000 

NY ..... E2007–BUSP–0651 ......... .................. Governor’s Island, New York Ferry System ........................................... 1,000,000 

NY ..... E2007–BUSP–0652 ......... .................. Staten Island Ferry ................................................................................. 1,000,000 

PA ..... E2007–BUSP–0653 ......... .................. Philadelphia Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal ......................................... 1,000,000 

Subtotal ........................................................................................... 10,000,000 

Other Projects: 

--- E2007–BUSP–0654 ......... .................. Fuel Cell Bus Program ........................................................................... 11,500,000 

PA ..... E2007–BUSP–0655 ......... .................. Bus Testing ............................................................................................ 3,000,000 

Subtotal ........................................................................................... 14,500,000 

Unallocated Amount Transferred from Clean Fuels .............................. 26,279,000 

Unallocated Amount ............................................................................... 413,291,121 

Grand Total ............................................. ................................................................................................................. 872,961,210 

aThis allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. 

bThe State and description for the project listed are incorrectly shown as CA-Monterey Park, CA bus enchancement and improvements - construct maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service. The correct State is IL and the correct project description is 

Mattoon, Illinois—historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. cThis allocation was incorrectly listed as a Louisiana project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. 

dThis allocation was incorrectly listed as a Illinois project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. 

eThis Amount was incorrectly listed as $1,156,699 in Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations: 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–000 ........... .................... Alaska Mental Health Trust bus program, Alaska .............................. $189,844 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–001 ........... .................... Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal bus/parking facility, Alaska 675,686 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–002 ........... .................... Anchorage Museum/Transit intermodal depot, Alaska ....................... 1,457,667 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–004 ........... .................... Anchorage Ship Creek intermodal facility, Alaska ............................. 2,429,445 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–005 ........... .................... Copper River Transit program, Alaska ............................................... 1,457,667 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–008 ........... .................... Knik Arm intermodal facility terminal, Alaska ..................................... 506,764 

AK ..... E2005–BUSP–011 ........... .................... Whittier Intermodal Facility, Alaska .................................................... 1,181,937 

AL ...... E2005–BUSP–012 ........... .................... Alabama State Docks intermodal facility, Alabama ............................ 3,378,430 

AL ...... E2005–BUSP–013 ........... .................... Birmingham Intermodel Facility-Phase II, Alabama ........................... 3,401,224 

AL ...... E2005–BUSP–014 ........... .................... City of Orange Beach senior activity bus, Alabama ........................... 33,784 

AL ...... E2005–BUSP–016 ........... .................... Jacksonville State University buses, Alabama ................................... 1,943,557 

AL ...... E2005–BUSP–018 ........... .................... Oakwood College shuttle bus project, Alabama ................................ 90,572 

AL ...... E2005–BUSP–021 ........... .................... Vans, CASA of Marshall County, Alabama ........................................ 97,177 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13931 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

AR ..... E2005–BUSP–023 ........... .................... Arkansas Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... 6,893,126 

AR ..... E2005–BUSP–024 ........... .................... CATA bus replacement, Arkansas ..................................................... 388,711 

AZ ..... E2005–BUSP–027 ........... .................... Coconino County-Sedona bus system, Arizona ................................. 800,000 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–035 ........... .................... Bellflower Dial-a-Ride, California ........................................................ 116,614 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–709 ........... .................... Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for bus 

and bus facility improvements.

a g 728,834 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–036 ........... .................... Calabasas Transit, California .............................................................. 485,888 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–037 ........... .................... Catalina Transit Terminal, Redondo Beach, California ...................... 971,779 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–041 ........... .................... Downtown transit center ITS, California ............................................. 97,177 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–044 ........... .................... Elk Grove Park and Ride Facilities, California ................................... 971,779 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–045 ........... .................... Fairfield/Vacaville Intermodal Transit Station, California .................... 485,888 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–046 ........... .................... Fresno Area Express bus program, California ................................... 971,779 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–048 ........... .................... Hemet Transit Center bus facility, California ...................................... 340,123 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–049 ........... .................... I–15 Managed Lanes/Bus Rapid Transit, San Diego, California ....... 1,652,023 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–050 ........... .................... LAVTA buses and bus facilities, California ........................................ 168,921 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–051 ........... .................... LAVTA satellite maintenance, operations and administrative facility, 

California.

101,353 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–054 ........... .................... Los Angeles Trade Tech intermodal links with bus and Metro, California.485,888 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–055 ........... .................... Los Angeles Valley College bus station extension, California ........... 485,888 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–058 ........... .................... Modesto bus facility, California ........................................................... 337,843 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–060 ........... .................... Municipal Transit Operators Coalition, California ............................... 971,779 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–061 ........... .................... Napa Transit Center construction, California ..................................... 485,888 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–063 ........... .................... Palm Springs bus station relocation, California .................................. 29,154 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–064 ........... .................... Palo Alto Intermodal Transit Center, California .................................. 728,834 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–065 ........... .................... Riverbank vehicle garage renovation, California ................................ 121,472 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–071 ........... .................... San Luis Rey Transit Center, California ............................................. 388,711 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–072 ........... .................... Santa Clara VTA bus signal priority project, California ...................... 728,834 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–077 ........... .................... South Gate Clean Air buses, California ............................................. 242,945 

CA ..... E2005–BUSP–083 ........... .................... Transit Oriented Neighborhood Program, California .......................... 121,541 

CO ..... E2005–BUSP–089 ........... .................... Colorado Statewide buses and bus facilities ...................................... 2,738,091 

CT ..... E2005–BUSP–090 ........... .................... Bridgeport Intermodal Transportation Center, Connecticut ................ 583,427 

CT ..... E2005–BUSP–092 ........... .................... Hartford/New Britain Busway, Connecticut ......................................... 3,887,113 

CT ..... E2005–BUSP–093 ........... .................... Pulse Point Joint Development safety improvements, Connecticut ... 168,921 

CT ..... E2005–BUSP–094 ........... .................... Stamford Urban Transitway Phase II, Connecticut ............................ 5,830,669 

CT ..... E2005–BUSP–095 ........... .................... Waterbury bus maintenance facility, Connecticut .............................. 485,888 

CT ..... E2005–BUSP–096 ........... .................... West Haven/Orange Intermodal Facility, Connecticut ........................ 971,779 

DC ..... E2005–BUSP–098 ........... .................... Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Washington, DC ... 728,834 

DE ..... E2005–BUSP–099 ........... .................... Delaware Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... 1,278,334 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–710 ........... .................... Bus stop, bus pullout and transit improvements consistent with the 

City of Ft. Lauderdale Community Redevelopment Agency plan.

b g 971,779 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–101 ........... .................... DeBary Intermodal Transportation Facility, Florida ............................ 242,945 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–103 ........... .................... Gainesville Regional Airport multi-modal facility, Florida ................... 291,534 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–105 ........... .................... Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Florida ......................... 485,888 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–106 ........... .................... Homestead East-West bus connector, Florida ................................... 242,945 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–110 ........... .................... Miami Beach Intermodal Greenway Transit Facility, Florida .............. 680,245 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–111 ........... .................... Miami Beach Intermodal Transit Facility, Florida ............................... 680,245 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–112 ........... .................... Miami Intermodal Center, Florida ....................................................... 5,830,669 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–113 ........... .................... Miami-Dade County bus procurement, Florida ................................... 485,888 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–114 ........... .................... Miramar Parkway transit shelter enhancements, Florida ................... 97,177 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–116 ........... .................... North Florida and West Coast Transit Coalition Bus Acquisition ....... 834,466 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–119 ........... .................... Putnam County RideSolutions buses and bus facilities, Florida ........ 1,457,667 

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–121 ........... .................... Southwest Broward bus facility, Florida ............................................. 1,166,133

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–124 ........... .................... St. Petersburg intermodal facility, Florida ........................................... 485,888

FL ...... E2005–BUSP–126 ........... .................... Trolley System, Boynton Beach, Florida ............................................ 242,945 

GA ..... E2005–BUSP–130 ........... .................... Atlantic Station, Georgia ..................................................................... 1,068,956 

GA ..... E2005–BUSP–700 ........... .................... Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA) ........................... 4,373,003 

GA ..... E2005–BUSP–135 ........... .................... Moultrie Intermodal Facility, Georgia .................................................. 485,888 

IA ....... E2005–BUSP–144 ........... .................... UNI multimodal project, Iowa .............................................................. 2,797,380 

ID ...... E2005–BUSP–145 ........... .................... Idaho Transit Coalition Statewide buses and bus facilities ................ 1,069,753 

IL ....... E2005–BUSP–146 ........... .................... Bus facilities for Bloomington, Macomb, Peoria, and Rock Island 

(from Illinois Statewide buses and bus facilities).

1,181,668 

IL ....... E2005–BUSP–147 ........... .................... Champaign Day Care Center/Park-n-Ride (from Illinois Statewide 

buses and bus facilities).

728,834 

IL ....... E2005–BUSP–148 ........... .................... City of Chicago’s Free Trolley System (from Illinois Statewide buses 

and bus facilities).

728,833 

IL ....... E2005–BUSP–149 ........... .................... Downstate Illinois replacement buses (from Illinois Statewide buses 

and bus facilities).

2,915,335 

IN ...... E2005–BUSP–155 ........... .................... Citilink, Indiana .................................................................................... 514,687 

IN ...... E2005–BUSP–157 ........... .................... Ivy Tech State College multmodal facility, Indiana ............................ 485,888 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13932 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

KS ..... E2005–BUSP–164 ........... .................... Kansas statewide bus and bus facilities ............................................. 491,839 

KS ..... E2005–BUSP–165 ........... .................... Lawrence Transit System maintenance facility, Kansas .................... 388,711 

KS ..... E2005–BUSP–166 ........... .................... Regional maintenance/paratransit scheduling facility, Kansas .......... 777,422 

KS ..... E2005–BUSP–167 ........... .................... Wichita Transit Authority buses and bus facilities, Kansas ................ 242,945 

KY ..... E2005–BUSP–171 ........... .................... Manchester, Clay County Intermodal Facility, Kentucky .................... 1,943,557 

KY ..... E2005–BUSP–172 ........... .................... Murray/Calloway County Transit Authority, Kentucky ........................ 1,447,701 

KY ..... E2005–BUSP–175 ........... .................... Southern and Eastern Kentucky buses and bus facilities .................. 500,000 

KY ..... E2005–BUSP–177 ........... .................... Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, Kentucky ........................... 203,212 

KY ..... E2005–BUSP–178 ........... .................... University of Louisville bus shuttle program, Kentucky ...................... 2,429,445 

LA ...... E2005–BUSP–180 ........... .................... Louisiana Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... 3,417,992 

MA ..... E2005–BUSP–183 ........... .................... Attleboro Intermodal Transportation Center, Massachusetts ............. 1,943,557 

MA ..... E2005–BUSP–190 ........... .................... Lechmere Station intermodal, Massachusetts .................................... 971,779 

MA ..... E2005–BUSP–194 ........... .................... Salem Intermodal Center improvement project, Massachusetts ........ 971,779 

MA ..... E2005–BUSP–195 ........... .................... Springfield Union Station, Springfield, Massachusetts ....................... 6,505,083 

MA ..... E2005–BUSP–196 ........... .................... UMass Transit RTIC and training facility, Massachusetts .................. 3,887,113 

MA ..... E2005–BUSP–197 ........... .................... Wonderland Station improvements, Revere, Massachusetts ............. 1,943,557 

MD .... E2005–BUSP–198 ........... .................... Glenmont Metrorail parking garage expansion, Maryland ................. 485,888 

MD .... E2005–BUSP–199 ........... .................... Howard County Transit repair facility, Maryland ................................ 485,888 

MD .... E2005–BUSP–200 ........... .................... Maryland Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... 3,609,668 

MD .... E2005–BUSP–201 ........... .................... Rockville Town Center transit project, Maryland ................................ 971,779 

ME ..... E2005–BUSP–206 ........... .................... Millinocket Airport transfer bus project, Maine ................................... 34,012 

MI ...... E2005–BUSP–207 ........... .................... Allegan County Transportation, Michigan ........................................... 1,132,067 

MI ...... E2005–BUSP–209 ........... .................... Ann Arbor Transit Authority (AATA) transit center, Michigan ............ 337,843 

MI ...... E2005–BUSP–223 ........... .................... Harbor Transit, Michigan .................................................................... 194,357 

MI ...... E2005–BUSP–237 ........... .................... Muskegon Area Transit System, Michigan ......................................... 485,888 

MN .... E2005–BUSP–246 ........... .................... Como Rider program, Minnesota ....................................................... 1,457,667

MN .... E2005–BUSP–248 ........... .................... Greater Minnesota Transit .................................................................. 112,000 

MN .... E2005–BUSP–711 ........... .................... White Earth Tribal Nation bus and bus related activities, MN ........... c g 971,779 

MO .... E2005–BUSP–258 ........... .................... Missouri statewide bus and bus facilities ........................................... 855,797 

MO .... E2005–BUSP–259 ........... .................... Southern Missouri buses and bus facilities ........................................ 320,297 

MS ..... E2005–BUSP–260 ........... .................... Harrison County HOV/Bus rapid transit Canal Road intermodal connector, Mississippi.1,943,557 

MS ..... E2005–BUSP–704 ........... .................... City of Jackson, Mississippi ................................................................ d 2,915,334 

MS ..... E2005–BUSP–263 ........... .................... Mississippi Valley State University mass transit program expansion, 

Mississippi.

194,357 

MT ..... E2005–BUSP–266 ........... .................... Billings public bus and medical transfer facility, Montana .................. 2,429,445 

NC ..... E2005–BUSP–268 ........... .................... Chapel Hill replacement buses, North Carolina ................................. 24,422 

NC ..... E2005–BUSP–269 ........... .................... Charlotte Multi-modal Transportation Center, North Carolina ............ 17,839 

NC ..... E2005–BUSP–271 ........... .................... North Carolina Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................. 2,682,851 

NC ..... E2005–BUSP–272 ........... .................... Triangle Transit Authority replacement buses, North Carolina .......... 971,779 

ND ..... E2005–BUSP–273 ........... .................... North Dakota Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................... 626,797 

NE ..... E2005–BUSP–274 ........... .................... Kearney RYDE Transit, Nebraska ...................................................... 1,020,367

NJ ...... E2005–BUSP–280 ........... .................... Bergen Intermodal Stations and Park N’Rides, New Jersey ............. 1,943,557 

NJ ...... E2005–BUSP–281 ........... .................... Englewood bus purchase, New Jersey .............................................. 364,417 

NJ ...... E2005–BUSP–285 ........... .................... Park and Ride for the Edison Train Station, New Jersey .................. 971,779 

NM .... E2005–BUSP–289 ........... .................... New Mexico Statewide bus and bus facilities .................................... 93,097 

NM .... E2005–BUSP–291 ........... .................... West Side transit facility, New Mexico ............................................... 371,779 

NV ..... E2005–BUSP–292 ........... .................... Bus Rapid Transit, Virginia Street Phase 1, Nevada ......................... 291,779 

NV ..... E2005–BUSP–294 ........... .................... Las Vegas buses, Nevada .................................................................. 971,779 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–296 ........... .................... Boro Park JCC bus purchase, New York ........................................... 194,357 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–297 ........... .................... Brookhaven Town Senior Citizen Jitney Bus, New York ................... 121,472 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–298 ........... .................... Broome County hybrid buses, New York ........................................... 1,554,845 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–300 ........... .................... Bus Facility, 65th Street Intermodal Station, New York ..................... 7,288,337 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–301 ........... .................... Central New York Regional Transportation Authority, New York ...... 3,158,279 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–302 ........... .................... Fort Edward Intermodal Station, New York ........................................ 291,534 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–303 ........... .................... Irvington Intermodal Upgrades, New York ......................................... 242,945 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–304 ........... .................... Jacobi Transportation Facility, New York ........................................... 971,779 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–305 ........... .................... Jamaica Intermodal Facilities, New York ........................................... 1,943,557 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–306 ........... .................... JCC of Coney Island Bus Purchase, New York ................................. 97,177 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–308 ........... .................... Pelham Intermodal Improvements, New York .................................... 485,888 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–309 ........... .................... Renaissance Square, New York ......................................................... 6,316,558 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–310 ........... .................... Rochester Central Bus Terminal, New York ...................................... 5,441,959 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–311 ........... .................... Senior Bus Service Bus Replacement, North Hempstead, New York 291,534 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–314 ........... .................... Sullivan County buses and bus facilities, New York .......................... 485,888 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–316 ........... .................... Tuckahoe Intermodal Improvements, New York ................................ 38,872 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–317 ........... .................... Ulster County Hybrid Buses, New York ............................................. 1 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–318 ........... .................... Westchester County Bee Line Bus Replacement, New York ............ 3,887,113 

NY ..... E2005–BUSP–319 ........... .................... White Plains Downtown Circulator, New York ................................... 242,945 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–321 ........... .................... Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ............................. 534,478 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–322 ........... .................... Central Ohio Transity Authority ITS Phase III .................................... 194,357 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13933 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–323 ........... .................... Cincinnati Local Community bus enhancements, Ohio ...................... 777,422 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–324 ........... .................... Cleveland Clinic Pedestrian Access Tunnel, Ohio ............................. 971,779 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–325 ........... .................... Cuyahoga County Plan for Senior Transportation, Ohio .................... 971,779 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–328 ........... .................... Ohio statewide buses and bus facilities ............................................. 529,163 

OH ..... E2005–BUSP–330 ........... .................... TARTA/TARPS Intermodal Facility, Ohio ........................................... 1,457,667 

OK ..... E2005–BUSP–331 ........... .................... Lawton buses and bus facilities, Oklahoma ....................................... 201,158 

OK ..... E2005–BUSP–333 ........... .................... Northern Oklahoma regional multimodal facilities and transit system, Oklahoma.4,858,891 

OK ..... E2005–BUSP–334 ........... .................... Oklahoma DOT Transit Program, Oklahoma ..................................... 2,300,771 

OK ..... E2005–BUSP–706 ........... .................... Tulsa transit buses and equipment/Tulsa Transit Multi-use facility in 

Tulsa, Oklahoma.

e 1,943,557 

OR ..... E2005–BUSP–338 ........... .................... Lewis and Clark explorer shuttle parking, Oregon ............................. 485,888 

OR ..... E2005–BUSP–341 ........... .................... South Metro Area Rapid Transit park-and-ride facility and transit 

center, Oregon.

485,888 

OR ..... E2005–BUSP–343 ........... .................... Yamhill County Transit bus and bus facilities, Oregon ...................... 81,028 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–346 ........... .................... Ardmore transit center, Pennsylvania ................................................. 5,404,669 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–347 ........... .................... Area Transit Authority, Pennsylvania ................................................. 1,384,784 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–348 ........... .................... Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania passenger terminal, Pennsylvania.766,724 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–357 ........... .................... Cruise Terminal Intermodal Facility, Pennsylvania ............................ 485,888 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–360 ........... .................... Harrisburg Transportation Center, Pennsylvania ............................... 971,779 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–362 ........... .................... Incline Plane Cable Replacement, Johnstown, Pennsylvania ........... 116,614 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–363 ........... .................... Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority, Charleroi, Pennsylvania ............... 585,013 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–364 ........... .................... Mid-County Transit Authority Kittanning, Pennsylvania ..................... 213,792 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–366 ........... .................... Northumberland County Transportation, Pennsylvania ...................... 97,177 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–368 ........... .................... Union Station Intermodal Trade and Transit Center, Schuylkill 

County, Pennsylvania.

1,943,557 

PA ..... E2005–BUSP–369 ........... .................... Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance, Union County, Pennsylvania 1,457,667 

PR ..... E2005–BUSP–372 ........... .................... Carolina Mini-Buses, Puerto Rico ....................................................... 1,846,378 

RI E2005–BUSP–373 ........... .................... Elmwood Facility Expansion, Rhode Island ....................................... 1,943,557 

SC ..... E2005–BUSP–376 ........... .................... South Carolina Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................ 858,714 

TN ..... E2005–BUSP–381 ........... .................... Memphis Airport Intermodal Facility, Tennessee ............................... 2,915,334 

TN ..... E2005–BUSP–382 ........... .................... Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency .............................. 728,834 

TN ..... E2005–BUSP–383 ........... .................... Tennessee Statewide buses and bus facilities .................................. 3,714,644 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–386 ........... .................... Brazos Transit District passenger shelter program, Texas ................ 485,888 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–387 ........... .................... Bryan Intermodel Transit Terminal with Parking, Texas .................... 317,061 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–388 ........... .................... Bryan/College Station Bus Replacement Program, Texas ................ 1,259,424 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–389 ........... .................... Capital Metro North Operating Facility, Texas ................................... 405,411 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–390 ........... .................... Capitol Metro buses and bus facilities, Texas .................................... 675,686 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–392 ........... .................... CNG bus replacement, Texas ............................................................ 388,711

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–393 ........... .................... Corpus Christi buses and bus facilities, Texas .................................. 691,008 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–395 ........... .................... Denton Downtown multimodal transit facility, Texas .......................... 3,109,690 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–396 ........... .................... EL Paso buses, Texas ........................................................................ 1

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–399 ........... .................... Houston METRO, Park and Rides, Texas ......................................... 4,581,945 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–401 ........... .................... Hunt County Committee on Aging Transit Vehicles, Texas ............... 971,779 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–403 ........... .................... Laredo Bus Hub and Maintenance Facility, Texas ............................ 1,943,557 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–405 ........... .................... The Woodlands Capital Cost of Contracting Program, Texas ........... 437,301 

TX ..... E2005–BUSP–406 ........... .................... Waco Transit Alternative Fueled Bus Purchase, Texas ..................... 3,887,113 

VA ..... E2005–BUSP–415 ........... .................... Hampton Roads Transit New Maintenance Facilities, Virginia .......... 2,186,501 

VA ..... E2005–BUSP–416 ........... .................... I–66/Vienna Metrorail Accessibility Improvements, Virginia ............... 583,067 

VA ..... E2005–BUSP–417 ........... .................... James City County natural gas buses, Virginia ................................. 815,334 

VA ..... E2005–BUSP–419 ........... .................... Potomac Yard Transit Way, Virginia .................................................. 777,422 

VT ..... E2005–BUSP–712 ........... .................... Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont.

ab 1,943,557 

VT ..... E2005–BUSP–425 ........... .................... Vermont Statewide buses and bus facilities ....................................... 700,481 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–426 ........... .................... Ben Franklin Transit Facility Improvements, Washington .................. 1,020,367 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–429 ........... .................... Community Transit Bus and Van Replacement, Washington ............ 971,779 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–430 ........... .................... Edmonds Crossing Mulitmodal Transportation Project, Washington 337,843 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–433 ........... .................... Grant Transit Authority vehicle replacement, Washington ................. 777,422 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–438 ........... .................... Jefferson Transit operations/maintenance facility, Washington ......... 202,706 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–441 ........... .................... King County Metro, King County Airfield Transfer Area, Washington 1,443,557 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–446 ........... .................... Pierce Transit Base expansion, Washington ...................................... 971,779 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–447 ........... .................... Port Angeles International Gateway Center, Washington .................. f 971,779 

WA .... E2005–BUSP–437 ........... .................... Jefferson Transit (Washington Small Bus System Program of 

Projects, Washington).

728,834 

Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... $249,592,772 

FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations: 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–000 ......... .................... Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal bus/parking facility ........... 742,500 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–001 ......... 427 Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal parking facility .................. 1,138,500 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13934 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–002 ......... 466 Anchorage-Transit Needs ................................................................... 226,710 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–003 ......... 422 C Street Expanded bus facility and inter-modal parking garage, Anchorage, AK.1,138,500 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–004 ......... 425 CITC Non-profit Services Center inter-modal parking facility, Anchorage, AK.683,100 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–005 ......... 541 Hoonah, AK-Intermodal Ferry Dock ................................................... 453,420 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–006 ......... 416 Improve marine inter-modal facilities in Ketchikan ............................. 3,187,800 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–007 ......... 236 Juneau, Alaska-transit bus acquisition and transit center .................. 341,550 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–008 ......... 550 Juneau-Transit Bus Acquisition and Transit Center ........................... 340,560 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–009 ......... 553 Ketchikan, Alaska-Transit Needs ........................................................ 56,430 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–010 ......... 574 Matsu, Alaska-Transit Needs .............................................................. 113,850 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–011 ......... 423 Morris Thompson Cultural and Visitors Center intermodal parking 

facility, Fairbanks, AK.

569,250 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–012 ......... 596 North Slope Borough, AK-Transit Purposes ....................................... 453,420 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–013 ......... 597 North Star Borough, AK-Transit Purposes ......................................... 226,710 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–014 ......... 616 Sitka, Alaska-Transit Needs ............................................................... 56,430 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–015 ......... .................... Skagway Intermodal facility, Alaska ................................................... 425,793 

AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–016 ......... 664 Wrangell, AK-Ferry Infrastructure ....................................................... 226,710 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–018 ......... 461 Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind-Bus project .............................. 113,850 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–019 ......... .................... Alabama State Docks Choctaw Point Terminal ................................. 2,138,400 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–020 ......... 462 Alabama State Port Authority-Choctaw Point Terminal ..................... 4,536,180 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–021 ......... 437 American Village/Montevallo, Alabama construction of closed loop 

Access Road, bus lanes and parking facility.

76,143 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–329 ......... 469 Auburn University-Intermodal Parking Garage ................................... 906,840 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–022 ......... 98 Birmingham, AL Expansion of Downtown Intermodal Facility, Phase 

II.

380,714 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–023 ......... 496 City of Birmingham, AL-Birmingham Downtown Intermodal Terminal, Phase II.1,133,550 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–024 ......... 501 City of Huntsville, AL-Cummings Park Intermodal Center ................. 1,133,550 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–026 ......... 504 City of Montgomery, AL-Montgomery Airport Intermodal Center ....... 906,840 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–027 ......... 507 City of Tuscaloosa, AL-Intermodal Facility ......................................... h 1,360,260 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–028 ......... .................... Family Connection of Shelby County Trans Project, AL .................... 49,500 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–029 ......... .................... Gadsden State Community College Transit Project, AL .................... 594,000 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–030 ......... 528 Gadsden, AL-Community Buses ........................................................ 113,850 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–032 ......... .................... Lawson State Community College, Alabama ..................................... 445,500 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–033 ......... 582 Mobile County, AL Commission-Bus project ...................................... 113,850 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–034 ......... .................... Mobile Waterfront Infrastructure Development, AL ............................ 594,000 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–036 ......... .................... Trolley Plaza, AL ................................................................................. 123,750 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–037 ......... 644 University of Alabama in Birmingham Intermodal Facility .................. 1,587,960 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–038 ......... 645 University of Alabama in Huntsville Intermodal Facility ..................... 1,360,260 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–039 ......... 646 University of Alabama Intermodal Facility South ................................ 2,041,380 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–040 ......... 647 University of Alabama Transit System ............................................... 340,560 

AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–041 ......... 650 US Space and Rocket Center, AL-Tramway Expansion .................... 226,710 

AR ..... E–2006–BUSP–042 ......... 487 Central Arkansas Transit Authority Facility Upgrades ........................ 445,500 

AR ..... E–2006–BUSP–044 ......... 231 Harrison, Arkansas-Trolley Barn ......................................................... 7,614 

AR ..... E–2006–BUSP–045 ......... .................... State of Arkansas-Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... 3,960,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–047 ......... .................... Coconino County Bus Facilities, AZ ................................................... 990,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–048 ......... 304 Coconino County buses and bus facilities for Flagstaff, AZ .............. 237,947 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–049 ......... 229 Coconino County, Arizona-Bus and bus facilities for the Sedona 

Transit System.

180,839 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–050 ......... .................... East Valley Bus Maintenance Facility, AZ .......................................... 990,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–051 ......... .................... Intermodal Center, Scottsdale, AZ ..................................................... 801,900 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–052 ......... 47 Phoenix, AZ Construct City of Phoenix para-transit facility (Dial-ARide).190,357 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–053 ......... 346 Phoenix, AZ Construct metro bus facility in Phoenix’s West Valley .. 951,786 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–054 ......... 150 Phoenix, AZ Construct regional heavy bus maintenance facility ....... 190,357 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–055 ......... .................... Phoenix/Avondale/Glendale Bus Expansion, Arizona ........................ 1,485,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–056 ......... .................... Phoenix/Glendale West Valley Operating Facility, Arizona ................ 990,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–057 ......... 26 Scottsdale, Arizona-Plan, design, and construct intermodal center ... 475,893 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–1113 ....... .................... Bio-diesel vehicles in Tucson, AZ ...................................................... i 1,980,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–059 ......... 203 Tempe, Arizona-Construct East Valley Metro Bus Facility ................ 1,237,322 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–060 ......... .................... Tucson SunTran Alternative Fuel Bus Replacement, AZ .................. 1,485,000 

AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–061 ......... .................... Tucson SunTran Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility, AZ ............ 4,950,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–062 ......... .................... ADA Paratransit Vehicles, San Diego, CA ......................................... 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–065 ......... 398 Amador County, California-Regional Transit Center .......................... 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–066 ......... 76 Baldwin Park, CA Construct vehicle and bicycle parking lot and pedestrian rest area at transit center.380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–067 ......... 227 Berkeley, CA Construct Ed Roberts Campus Intermodal Transit Disability Center.571,072 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–068 ......... .................... Blue Line Trolley Shelter Improvements, CA ..................................... 346,500 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13935 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–069 ......... .................... Burbank Airport Hybrid Shuttle Demonstration Project, CA ............... 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–070 ......... 119 Burbank, CA CNG Transit Vehicles Purchase for Local Transit Network Expansion.85,661 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–071 ......... 396 Burbank, CA Construction of Empire Area Transit Center near Burbank Airport.47,589 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–072 ......... 190 Calexico, CA Purchase new buses for the Calexico Transit System 57,107 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–073 ......... 132 Carson, CA Purchase one bus ........................................................... 47,589 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–074 ......... 407 Carson, CA Purchase one trolley-bus vehicle .................................... 47,589 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–075 ......... 108 Carson, CA Purchase two transfer facility .......................................... 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–076 ......... 54 City of Alameda, CA Plan, design, and construct intermodal facility 380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–077 ......... 155 City of Livermore, CA Construct Bus Facility for Livermore Amador 

Valley Transit Authority.

428,304 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–078 ......... .................... City of Modesto’s Bus Maintenance Facility, CA ............................... 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–079 ......... .................... Construct bus shelters in Bellflower, CA ............................................ 247,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–080 ......... .................... Corona Transit Center, CA ................................................................. 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–081 ......... 158 Covina, El Monte, Baldwin Park, Upland, CA Parking and Electronic 

Signage Improvements.

333,125 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–082 ......... 207 Culver City, CA Purchase compressed natural gas buses and expand natural gas fueling facility.704,322 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–083 ......... 17 Davis, CA Davis Multi-Modal Station to improve entrance to Amtrak 

Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking and improve 

service.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–084 ......... 11 Development of Gold Country Stage Transit Transfer Center, Nevada County, CA.177,093 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–087 ......... .................... Ed Roberts Campus, Berkeley, CA .................................................... 297,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–088 ......... .................... El Garces Intermodal Station, Needles, CA ....................................... 1,980,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–089 ......... 101 Emeryville, CA Expand & Improve Inter-modal Transit Center at 

Amtrak Station.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–091 ......... .................... Fairfield/Vacaville Intermodal Station, CA .......................................... 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–092 ......... .................... Foothill Transit, San Gabriel Valley, CA ............................................. 3,267,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–093 ......... 387 Fresno, CA-Develop program of low-emission transit vehicles ......... 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–094 ......... 260 Gardena, CA Purchase of alternative fuel buses for service expansion, on-board security system and bus facility training equipment.1,166,889 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–095 ......... 212 Glendale, CA Construction of Downtown Streetcar Project ............... 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–096 ......... 1 Glendale, CA Purchase of CNG Buses for Glendale Beeline Transit 

System.

87,945 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–097 ......... .................... Golden Empire Transit traffic signal priority project, CA .................... 247,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–098 ......... .................... Greater Sacramento Regional Bus Replacement/Bus Facility Expansion, CA.990,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–099 ......... 414 Hercules, CA Inter-modal Rail Station Improvements ........................ 285,536 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1107 ....... .................... Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery Science Center, 

Santa Ana, CA.

j 297,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–101 ......... .................... Intermodal Transit Center, Bell Gardens, CA ..................................... 396,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–103 ......... .................... La Habra Shuttle Senior Transportation Program, CA ....................... 155,430 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–104 ......... .................... Lakewood Bus Stop Improvements, Lakewood, California ................ 396,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–105 ......... .................... Livermoore Amador Valley Satellite Maintenance and Operations 

Facility, California.

990,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–106 ......... .................... Long Beach Transit Bus Purchase, California ................................... 742,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–107 ......... 276 Long Beach, Ca Museum of Latin American Art, Long Beach, to 

build intermodal park and ride facility.

380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–108 ......... 332 Long Beach, CA Park and Ride Facility ............................................. 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–109 ......... 295 Long Beach, CA Purchase one larger (75. passengers) and two 

smaller (40 passengers) ferryboats and construct related dock 

work to facilitate the use and accessibility of the ferryboats.

571,072 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–110 ......... 410 Long Beach, CA Purchase ten clean fuel buses ............................... 571,072 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–111 ......... 443 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, CA capital 

funds for facility improvements to support the Cal State 

Northridge tram system.

61,866 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–112 ......... .................... Los Angeles Valley College Bus Station Extension, California .......... 742,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–113 ......... 140 Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw Bus Rapid Transit ................................. 1,623,366 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–114 ......... 223 Los Angeles, CA Design and construct improved transit and pedestrian linkages between Los Angeles Community College and 

nearby MTA rail stop and bus lines.

285,536 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–115 ......... 307 Los Angeles, CA Improve safety, mobility and access between 

LATTC, Metro line and nearby bus stops on Grand Ave between 

Washington and 23rd.

95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–116 ......... 121 Los Angeles, CA Improve transit shelters, sidewalks lighting and 

landscaping around Cedar’s-Sinai Medical Center.

285,536 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–118 ......... 36 Los Angeles, CA Wilshire-Vermont subway station reconstruction ... 190,357 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13936 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–119 ......... 6 Los Angeles, CA, Construction of Intermodal Transit Center at California State University Los Angeles.150,382 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–120 ......... 567 Los Angeles, CA, Fly-Away Bus System Expansion ......................... 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–121 ......... 566 Los Angeles, CA, LAX Intermodal Transportation Center Rail and 

Bus System Expansion.

495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–122 ......... 311 Mammoth Lakes, California-Regional Transit Maintenance Facility .. 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–123 ......... 112 Mariposa, CA-Yosemite National Park CNG-Hydrogen transit buses 

and facilities.

475,893 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–124 ......... 266 Martinez, CA Inter-modal Facility Restoration .................................... 285,536 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–125 ......... 285 Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Light Rail Transit Project from 

Pasadena, CA to Montclair, CA.

2,855,358 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–126 ......... 39 Monrovia, California-Transit Village Project ....................................... 571,072 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–127 ......... .................... Monrovia, Los Angeles County, CA, Transit Village .......................... 1,485,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–128 ......... 200 Montebello, CA Bus Lines Bus Fleet Replacement Project ............... 133,250 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–130 ......... 321 Monterey Park, CA Catch Basins at Transit Stop Installation ........... 60,915 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–131 ......... 191 Monterey Park, CA Safety improvements at a bus stop including 

creation of bus loading areas and street improvements.

304,572 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–132 ......... .................... Monterey Salinas Transit, Monterey, California ................................. 396,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–133 ......... 375 Monterey, CA Purchase bus equipment ............................................. 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–134 ......... 43 Needles, California-El Garces Intermodal Facility .............................. 380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–135 ......... .................... New Bus Facility Capital Improvements, California (San Joaquin) .... 990,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–136 ......... 92 Norwalk, CA Transit System Bus Procurement and Los Angeles 

World Airport Remote Fly-Away Facility Project.

152,286 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–137 ......... 392 Oakland, CA Construct Bay Trail between Coliseum BART station 

and Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline.

171,321 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–138 ......... 352 Oakland, CA Construct streetscape & intermodal improvements at 

BART Station Transit Villages.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–139 ......... .................... OCTA BRT .......................................................................................... 1,485,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–142 ......... 173 Ontario, CA Construct Omnitrans Transcenter .................................. 190,654 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–143 ......... 194 Orange County Transit Authority, California-Security surveillance 

and monitoring equipment.

1,006,989 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–144 ......... 244 Orange County, CA Purchase buses for rapid transit ........................ 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–145 ......... 366 Orange County, CA Transportation Projects to Encourage Use of 

Transit to Reduce Congestion.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–146 ......... .................... Pacific Station Multimodal Facility, Santa Cruz, California ................ 396,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–147 ......... .................... Palm Springs Aerial Tramway Bus Project, CA ................................. 594,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–148 ......... 45 Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit bus purchase ..................... 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–149 ......... 70 Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit: CalStrat-Weststart fuel cell 

bus program.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–150 ......... .................... Paramount Easy Rider Clean-Air Buses, Paramount, California ....... 198,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–151 ......... 399 Pasadena, CA ITS Improvements ...................................................... 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–395 ......... .................... Placerville Station II ............................................................................ k 990,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–152 ......... 116 Pleasant Hill, CA Construct Diablo Valley College Bus Transit Center.285,536 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–153 ......... .................... Redondo Beach Coastal Shuttle Transit Vehicles, California ............ 693,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–154 ......... 251 Redondo Beach, CA Capital Equipment procurement of 12. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles for Coastal Shuttle 

Services by Beach Cities Transit.

152,286 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–155 ......... 286 Richmond, CA BART Parking Structure ............................................. 951,786 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–156 ......... .................... Riverside Transit Center, CA .............................................................. 742,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–157 ......... 171 Riverside, California-RTA Advanced Traveler Information System ... 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–158 ......... .................... Rosemary Children’s Services’ Transportation Program, California .. 74,250 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–159 ......... 189 Sacramento, CA Bus enhancement and improvements-construct 

maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve 

transit service.

380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–160 ......... 84 Sacramento, CA Construct intermodal station and related improvements.1,332,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–162 ......... 253 San Bernardino, CA Implement Santa Fe Depot improvements in 

San Bernardino.

95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–164 ......... 282 San Diego, CA Completion of San Diego Joint Transportation Operations Center (JTOC).380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–165 ......... 314 San Diego, CA Widen sidewalks and bus stop entrance, and provide diagonal parking, in the Skyline Paradise Hills neighborhood 

(Reo Drive).

57,107 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–166 ......... 183 San Fernando Valley, CA Reseda Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Route ... 114,214 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–167 ......... 127 San Fernando, CA Purchase CNG buses and related equipment 

and construct facilities.

578,686 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–173 ......... 341 San Gabriel Valley, CA-Foothill Transit Park and Rides .................... 1,808,393 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–174 ......... 254 San Joaquin, California Regional Rail-Altamont Commuter Express 

Corridor inter-modal centers.

761,429 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13937 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–175 ......... 382 San Luis Ray, California-Transit Center Project ................................ 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–176 ......... .................... San Luis Rey Transit Center .............................................................. 495,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–177 ......... 145 Santa Ana, CA Improve Santa Ana transit terminal ........................... 190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–178 ......... 147 Santa Barbara, CA-Expansion of Regional Intermodal Transit Center.57,107 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–180 ......... 364 Santa Monica, CA Construct intermodal park-and-ride facility at 

Santa Monica College campus on South Bundy Drive near Airport Avenue.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–181 ......... 172 Santa Monica, CA Purchase and service LNG buses for Santa 

Monica’s Big Blue Bus to meet increased ridership needs and reduce emissions.

713,840 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–182 ......... .................... Shuttle bus to transport seniors in Bell Gardens, California .............. 99,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–183 ......... .................... Simi Valley Public Transit Radio Communications, CA ..................... 247,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–186 ......... 27 Sonoma County, CA Purchase of CNG buses .................................. 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–187 ......... 401 South Pasadena, CA Silent Night Grade Crossing Project ............... 171,321 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–188 ......... 383 South San Francisco, CA Construction of Ferry Terminal at Oyster 

Point in South San Francisco to the San Francisco Bay Water 

Transit Authority.

904,197 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–189 ......... .................... Spencer Avenue Bus Transfer Center, Oroville, CA .......................... 346,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–190 ......... 388 Sylmar, CA Los Angeles Mission College Transit Center construction.47,589 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–191 ......... 315 Temecula, California-Intermodal Transit Facility ................................ 95,179 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–192 ......... 85 Torrance Transit System, CA Acquisition of EPA and CARB-certified low emission replacement buses.571,072 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–193 ......... .................... Torrance Transit System, California ................................................... 396,000 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–195 ......... 35 Union City, CA Inter-modal Station, Phase 1: Modify BART station 809,018 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–197 ......... .................... Victor Valley Trans Operation/Maintenance Facility ........................... 742,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–200 ......... 195 Woodland Hills, CA Los Angeles Pierce College Bus Rapid Transit 

Station Extension.

190,357 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–201 ......... 83 Woodland, CA Yolobus operations, maintenance, administration facility expansion and improvements to increase bus service with 

alternative fuel buses.

380,714 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–202 ......... .................... Yorba Linda Senior Mobility Program—TRAILS ................................ 40,590 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–203 ......... .................... Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System ............................... 247,500 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–204 ......... .................... Zero Emission Bus Demonstration, Santa Clara, California .............. 396,000 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–206 ......... 449 City of Aspen, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... 133,250 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–207 ......... 448 City of Durango, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ...................................... 47,589 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–208 ......... 509 Colorado Association of Transit Agencies/Colorado Transit Coalition-Colorado Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities.4,029,135 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–210 ......... 518 Denver Regional Transit District-Bus Maintenance Facility ............... 680,130 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–211 ......... 520 Denver Regional Transit District-Denver Union Station Multimodal 

Renovations.

453,420 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–212 ......... 521 Denver Regional Transit District-US 36 Corridor BRT ....................... 1,587,960 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–213 ......... 167 Denver, CO Denver Union Station Inter-modal Center ...................... 1,046,965 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–216 ......... 188 Mountain Express, Crested Butte, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......... 95,179 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–218 ......... 445 Roaring Fork Transit Authority, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............... 142,768 

CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–220 ......... 450 Town of Snowmass Village, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................... 57,107 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–222 ......... .................... Bridgeport Intermodal Transport Center, CT ...................................... 3,960,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–223 ......... 44 Bridgeport, Connecticut-Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority Bus 

Facility.

95,179 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–224 ......... 478 Bridgeport, CT Facility Expansion/Improvement ................................ 346,500 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–225 ......... 90 Buses and bus related facilities throughout the State of Connecticut 1,142,143 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–226 ......... 523 Downtown Middletown, CT, Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Project.1,980,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–227 ......... 218 Enfield, Connecticut-intermodal station .............................................. 571,072 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–229 ......... .................... Inter-Modal Center, Middletown, CT ................................................... 297,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–230 ......... 267 Middletown, CT Construct intermodal center ..................................... 285,536 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–231 ......... 589 New Haven, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ......................................... 1,980,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–232 ......... 269 New London, Connecticut-Intermodal Transportation Center and 

Streetscapes.

95,179 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–233 ......... .................... Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit Facility ............................. 297,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–234 ......... .................... Norwalk Pulse Point Joint Improvements, CT .................................... 247,500 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–235 ......... 369 Norwalk, Connecticut-Pulse Point Joint Development inter-modal facility.95,179 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–236 ......... .................... South Norwalk Intermodal Facility, Norwalk, CT ................................ 990,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–237 ......... .................... Stamford Urban Transitway Phase II, CT .......................................... 2,970,000 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–238 ......... 131 Stonington and Mystic, Connecticut-Intermodal Center parking facility and Streetscape.464,471 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–239 ......... 32 Torrington, CT Construct bus-related facility (Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit District).380,714 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13938 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–240 ......... 270 Vernon, Connecticut-Intermodal Center, Parking and Streetscapes 1,446,715 

CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–241 ......... 657 Waterbury, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ........................................... 1,980,000 

DC ..... E–2006–BUSP–242 ......... .................... Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Washington, D.C .. 693,000 

DC ..... E–2006–BUSP–243 ......... .................... WMATA Bus Purchase ....................................................................... 1,485,000 

DE ..... E–2006–BUSP–245 ......... .................... Bus Replacement and Facilities, DE .................................................. 990,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–247 ......... .................... 2nd St/Andrews Ave/3rd St Enhancements, Fort Lauderdale, FL ..... 495,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–248 ......... .................... 7th Avenue Transit Hub, FL ............................................................... 396,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–249 ......... .................... Alternative fuel buses, Broward County, FL ....................................... 990,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–250 ......... 470 Bay County, FL-Transit Facility .......................................................... 453,420 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–251 ......... .................... Broward County Alternative Fuel Buses, FL ...................................... 113,850 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–252 ......... .................... Broward County Southwest Bus Facility, FL ...................................... 990,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–253 ......... 297 Broward County, FL-Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities .... 380,714 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–254 ......... 69 Broward County, FL Buses & Bus Facilities ...................................... 1,237,322 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–255 ......... 479 Broward County-Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................. 453,420 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–256 ......... 117 Broward, FL Purchase new articulated buses and bus stop improvements on State Road 7. (SR 7) between Golden Glades 

Interchange and Glades Road.

95,179 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–257 ......... 439 Central Florida Commuter Rail intermodal facilities ........................... 951,786 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–258 ......... 453 Central Florida Commuter Rail Intermodal facilities ........................... 683,100 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–262 ......... 508 Collier County Transit-Transit Facility ................................................. 226,710 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–263 ......... 23 Construct intermodal transportation & parking facility, City of Winter 

Park, Florida.

95,179 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–264 ......... .................... Flagler County Buses and Bus Facilities, FL ..................................... 297,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–265 ......... 80 Flagler County, Florida-bus facility ..................................................... 114,214 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–266 ......... 527 Florida Department of Transportation-Palm Beach County Replacement Buses.226,710 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–267 ......... 344 Gainesville, FL Bus Facility Expansion .............................................. 761,429 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–270 ......... 538 Hillsborough Area Regional Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Improvements.453,420 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–271 ......... 539 Hillsborough, FL, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority ........ 990,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–272 ......... .................... Homestead East-West Bus Connector, FL ........................................ 495,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–273 ......... .................... Intermodal Terminal Center, Jacksonville, FL .................................... 990,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–274 ......... .................... Jacksonville Transportation Authority Bus and Bus Facilities, FL ..... 336,600 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–279 ......... .................... JARC Hartline, Hillsborough County, FL ............................................ 247,500 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–280 ......... .................... Key West Buses and Bus Facilities, FL ............................................. 495,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–281 ......... .................... Lakeland Area Citrus Connection Transit Systems ............................ 247,500 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–282 ......... 558 Lakeland Area Mass Transit District/Citrus Connection-Capital 

Funding Needs.

453,420 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–284 ......... 103 Longwood, Florida-Construct Intermodal Transportation Facility ....... 95,179 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–285 ......... 308 Miami Dade, FL N.W. 7th Avenue Transit Hub .................................. 571,072 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–286 ......... 211 Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ........................ 1,142,143 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–287 ......... 432 Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ........................ 761,429 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–288 ......... 133 Miami-Dade County, Florida-Transit Security System ....................... 569,168 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–289 ......... 580 Miami-Dade Transit 7th Avenue NW Transit Hub .............................. 226,710 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–290 ......... 454 Miami-Dade Transit Dadeland South Intermodal Center ................... 455,400 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–291 ......... .................... Miramar Town Center Transit Hub, Miramar, Florida ........................ 495,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–293 ......... 136 Ocala and Marion County, Florida-replacement buses ...................... 571,072 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–296 ......... 125 Palm Beach County, FL Plan and Construct Belle Glade Combined 

Passenger Transit Facility.

666,250 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–297 ......... 367 Palm Beach, FL 20 New Buses for Palm Tran .................................. 285,536 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–298 ......... 248 Palm Beach, FL Palm Tran AVL–APC system with smart card fare 

boxes.

47,589 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–299 ......... .................... Palm Tran, Palm Beach County, FL ................................................... 247,500 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–303 ......... 600 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization-Pinellas Mobility Initiative: BRT and Guide way.226,710 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–304 ......... 415 Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL 428,304 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–305 ......... 420 Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL 380,714 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–307 ......... .................... Putnam County, FL Ride Solutions Buses ......................................... 742,500 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–309 ......... 623 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Beach 

Intermodal Facility.

453,420 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–311 ......... .................... Space Coast Area Transit Bus Terminal, FL ..................................... 198,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–312 ......... .................... St. Johns County, FL Council on Aging Buses .................................. 495,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–313 ......... 31 St. Augustine, Florida-Intermodal Transportation Center and related 

pedestrian and landscape improvements.

190,357 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–314 ......... 390 St. Lucie County, FL Purchase Buses ............................................... 190,357 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–317 ......... 402 Tampa, FL Establish Transit Emphasis Corridor Project ................... 142,768 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–318 ......... 148 Tampa, FL Purchase buses and construct bus facilities ................... 428,304 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–319 ......... .................... Treasure Coast Connector, St. Lucie County, FL .............................. 495,000 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–320 ......... .................... Trolley Shelter, West Palm Beach, Florida ........................................ 247,500 

FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–321 ......... .................... Trolley System, Boynton Beach, FL ................................................... 247,500 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13939 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–324 ......... 355 Albany, GA Bus replacement ............................................................. 57,107 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–325 ......... 255 Albany, GA Multimodal Facility ........................................................... 152,286 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–326 ......... 357 Athens, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ................................................. 270,308 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–327 ......... 247 Atlanta, GA Inter-modal Passenger Facility Improvements ............... 380,714 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–330 ......... 144 Augusta, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ............................................... 76,143 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–331 ......... .................... Buses and Bus Facilities, GA ............................................................. 495,000 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–332 ......... .................... Chatham Area Transit Authority bus and facility, GA ........................ 495,000 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–333 ......... .................... City of Moultrie, Georgia, Intermodal Facility ..................................... 495,000 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–335 ......... 91 Columbus, GA Bus replacement ........................................................ 57,107 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–336 ......... 510 Columbus, Georgia/Phoenix City, Alabama-National Infantry Museum Multimodal Facility.385,110 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–337 ......... 49 Columbus, Georgia-Buses & Bus Facilities ........................................ 184,456 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–338 ......... 530 Georgia Department of Transportation-Georgia Statewide Bus and 

Bus Facilities.

2,041,380 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–339 ......... .................... Georgia GRTA Xpress Implementation Buses ................................... l 2,227,500 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–340 ......... 60 Georgia Statewide Bus Program ........................................................ 38,071 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–341 ......... 275 Jesup, Georgia-Train Depot intermodal center .................................. 190,357 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–346 ......... 406 Moultrie, GA Inter-modal facility ......................................................... 57,107 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–347 ......... .................... Purchase Transit Buses for Macon Transit Authority, Georgia .......... 495,000 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–348 ......... 329 Quitman, Clay, Randolph, Stewart Co., GA Bus project .................... 47,589 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–349 ......... 256 Savannah, GA Bus and Bus Facilities-Chatham Area Transit ........... 951,786 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–350 ......... 348 Savannah, Georgia-Water Ferry River walk intermodal facilities ....... 380,714 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–352 ......... 206 Sylvester, GA Inter-modal Facility ...................................................... 38,071 

GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–353 ......... 298 Thomasville, GA Bus Replacement .................................................... 38,071 

GU ..... E–2006–BUSP–354 ......... .................... MTA transit vehicles for disabled persons, Guam ............................. 297,000 

HI ...... E–2006–BUSP–355 ......... .................... Honolulu Bus and Bus Facilities, HI ................................................... 2,800,000

HI ...... E–2006–BUSP–356 ......... 540 Honolulu, HI, Bus Facilities ................................................................. 1,336,500 

IA ....... E–2006–BUSP–358 ......... .................... 10 new fixed-route buses, Cedar Rapids, IA ..................................... 148,500 

IA ....... E–2006–BUSP–360 ......... 475 Black Hawk County, IA UNI Multimodal Project ................................. 680,130 

IA ....... E–2006–BUSP–361 ......... .................... City of Coralville Intermodal Facility, IA .............................................. 569,250

IA ....... E–2006–BUSP–365 ......... .................... Johnson County SEATS Para-Transit Facility Program, IA ............... 99,000 

IA ....... E–2006–BUSP–367 ......... .................... UNI Multimodal Project, Cedar Falls, Iowa ........................................ 1,559,250 

IA ....... E–2006–BUSP–368 ......... .................... University of Northern Iowa Multi ....................................................... 247,500

ID ...... E–2006–BUSP–369 ......... 176 Boise, ID-Multimodal facility ................................................................ 456,607 

ID ...... E–2006–BUSP–371 ......... .................... Idaho Statewide ITS ........................................................................... 99,000 

ID ...... E–2006–BUSP–372 ......... .................... Idaho Transit Coalition Bus Capital Investment ................................. 2,128,500 

ID ...... E–2006–BUSP–373 ......... .................... Idaho Transit Coalition Buses and Bus Facilities ............................... 742,500 

ID ...... E–2006–BUSP–374 ......... 652 Valley Regional Transit, ID-Downtown Boise Multimodal .................. 1,315,710 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–378 ......... 433 Centralia, Illinois-South Central Mass Transit District Improvements 76,143 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–379 ......... 226 Champaign, IL-Construct park and ride lot with attached daycare facility.285,536 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–382 ......... 491 Chicago, IL, Cermak Road, Bus Rapid Transit .................................. 198,000 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–383 ......... 358 Cicero, Chicago Establish Transit Signal Priority, Cicero Ave., Pace 

Suburban Bus.

190,357 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–384 ......... 4 Des Plaines, Wauconda, Cook and Lake Counties, IL Rand Road 

Transit Signal Priority.

152,286 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–385 ......... 296 Elgin to Rockford, Illinois-Intermodal stations along planned Metra 

Union Pacific West Line extension alignment, including necessary 

alternatives analysis.

95,179 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–386 ......... 114 Geneva, Illinois-Construct commuter parking deck for Metra Service 761,429 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–387 ......... .................... IL Statewide buses and facilities ........................................................ 7,920,000 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–388 ......... 291 Joliet, Illinois-Union Station commuter parking facility ....................... 547,277 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–129 ......... 186 Mattoon, Illinois-historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center m 304,572 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–389 ......... 250 Maywood, IL Purchase buses ............................................................ 9,518 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–390 ......... 429 Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center ............................. 380,714 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–391 ......... 163 Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center, including facilities 

for adjacent public and nonprofit uses.

951,786 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–392 ......... .................... PACE Bus Service to the College of DuPage, Glen Ellyn, IL ............ 198,000 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–393 ......... .................... Pace Suburban Bus Transit Signal Priority, Illinois ............................ 495,000 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–394 ......... 365 Pace Suburban Bus, IL South Suburban BRT Mobility Network ....... 95,179 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–398 ......... 632 Springfield, IL, Multimodal Transit Terminal ....................................... 792,000 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–399 ......... 259 St. Charles, IL-Intermodal Parking Structures .................................... 856,607 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–400 ......... .................... Town of Normal Multimodal Transportation Center, IL ...................... 1,980,000 

IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–402 ......... 135 Wheaton, IL Pace Suburban Bus-Purchase buses ............................ 190,357 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–403 ......... .................... Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation, IN ........................... 272,382 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–404 ......... 109 Bloomington, IN-Bus and transfer facility ........................................... 915,618 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–405 ......... .................... Bloomington, Indiana University Campus Bus System, IN ................ 594,000 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–408 ......... .................... City of Anderson Intermodal Center Project, IN ................................. 123,750 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–409 ......... .................... Fort Wayne Citilink, IN ........................................................................ 123,750 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–410 ......... 529 Gary, Indiana, Gary Airport Station Modernization and Shuttle Service Project.346,500 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13940 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–411 ......... 544 Indianapolis Downtown Transit Center ............................................... 792,000 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–412 ......... 235 Indianapolis, IN Construct the Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal 

Facility.

951,786 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–413 ......... 5 Indianapolis, IN Downtown Transit Center ......................................... 2,665,001 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–414 ......... 220 Indianapolis, IN IndySMART program to relieve congestion, improve 

safety and air quality.

380,714 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–415 ......... 378 Indianapolis, IN Relocate and improve inter-modal transportation for 

pedestrian to Children’s Museum of Indianapolis.

2,665,001 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–416 ......... 417 Indianapolis, Indiana-Children’s Museum Intermodal Center ............. 190,357 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–417 ......... .................... Ivy Tech Multi-Modal Facility, Indianapolis, IN ................................... 297,000 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–418 ......... .................... Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility, IN ................................. 173,250 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–419 ......... 546 Ivy Tech State College, Indiana Multimodal Center ........................... 148,500 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–421 ......... .................... Lake County Bus Systems, IN ............................................................ 148,500 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–423 ......... .................... N. Indiana Mental Health Trans. Partnership ..................................... 247,500 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–424 ......... .................... NIMHTP, Madison Center, South Bend, IN ........................................ 495,000 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–425 ......... 617 South Bend, Indiana, TRANSPO Bus Operations Center ................. 792,000 

IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–426 ......... 141 South Bend, Indiana-Construct South Bend Bus Operations Center 190,357 

KS ..... E–2006–BUSP–428 ......... 53 Johnson Co., KS Bus and bus related facilities [I–35. corridor], 

Johnson Co. Transit.

380,714 

KS ..... E–2006–BUSP–429 ......... .................... Johnson County Fleet Vehicle Replacement, KS .............................. 346,500 

KS ..... E–2006–BUSP–432 ......... .................... Kansas Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, KS ................................... 693,000 

KS ..... E–2006–BUSP–433 ......... .................... Wichita Transit Authority, KS .............................................................. 792,000 

KS ..... E–2006–BUSP–434 ......... .................... Wyandotte County Unified Government Transit, KS .......................... 495,000 

KY ..... E–2006–BUSP–435 ......... .................... Foothills Community Action Partnership Foothills Express Transit 

Expansion Project, KY.

346,500 

KY ..... E–2006–BUSP–437 ......... .................... Harlan County Transit Center, KY ...................................................... 495,000 

KY ..... E–2006–BUSP–439 ......... .................... Lincoln County Senior Citizen Bus, Kentucky .................................... n 54,000 

KY ..... E–2006–BUSP–442 ......... 372 Richmond, KY Purchase buses, bus equipment and facilities ........... 137,058 

KY ..... E–2006–BUSP–443 ......... .................... Southern and Eastern Ky Bus and Bus Facilities .............................. 495,000 

KY ..... E–2006–BUSP–444 ......... .................... TARC—purchase of 10 hybrid electric buses .................................... 495,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–446 ......... .................... Bus Terminal and Support Facility, Lake Charles, LA ....................... 990,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–447 ......... 484 Capital Area Transit System-Baton Rouge BRT ................................ 680,130 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–448 ......... .................... Greater Ouachita Port intermodal facility, LA ..................................... 396,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–449 ......... 72 Hammond, Louisiana-Passenger Intermodal facility at Southeastern 

University.

38,071 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–450 ......... .................... Intermodal Facility, Ouachita Parish, LA ............................................ 495,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–451 ......... .................... LA Statewide buses and facilities ....................................................... 3,781,065 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–452 ......... 555 Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, LA-Lafayette 

Multimodal Transportation Facility.

226,710 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–453 ......... .................... Lafayette Louisiana Multimodal Transportation Facility ..................... 148,500 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–455 ......... 239 Lafayette, Louisiana-Lafayette Transit System bus replacement program.171,321 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–456 ......... 356 Lafayette, Louisiana-Multimodal center, Final Phase ......................... 571,072 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–458 ......... 170 Louisiana-Construct pedestrian walkways between Caddo St. and 

Milam St. along Edwards St. in Shreveport, LA.

193,327 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–459 ......... .................... New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal Rehab, Louisiana .............. 990,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–460 ......... 55 New Orleans, LA Inter-modal Riverfront Center ................................ 95,179 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–462 ......... 243 New Orleans, LA Regional Planning Commission, bus and bus facilities.95,179 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–463 ......... 310 River Parishes, LA South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities.190,357 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–464 ......... 606 River Parishes, Louisiana, South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities.158,400 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–465 ......... .................... RiverSphere Multimodal Facility, Louisiana ........................................ 198,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–466 ......... 277 Shreveport, LA-intermodal Transit Facility ......................................... 637,697 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–467 ......... 625 Southeastern Louisiana University Intermodal Facility ....................... 297,000 

LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–468 ......... 283 St. Bernard Parish, LA Intermodal facility improvements ................... 190,357 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–470 ......... 118 Attleboro, MA Construction, engineering and site improvements at 

the Attleboro Intermodal Center.

380,714 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–471 ......... 472 Berkshire, MA, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bus Maintenance Facility.49,500 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–472 ......... 59 Beverly, MA Design and Construct Beverly Deport Intermodal 

Transportation Center.

380,714 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–473 ......... 273 Boston, MA Harbor Park Pavilion & Inter-modal Station ................... 237,947 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–476 ......... .................... Construction of Amesbury Bus Facility, MA ....................................... 1,188,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–477 ......... 330 Framingham, MA Local Intra-Framingham Transit System enhancements.342,643 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–478 ......... .................... Franklin Multimodal Center, MA ......................................................... 1,485,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–480 ......... 124 Haverhill, MA Design and Construct Inter-modal Transit Parking Improvements.1,066,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13941 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–481 ......... 21 Hingham, MA Higham Marine Intermodal Center Improvements: Enhance public transportation infrastructure/parking.1,713,215 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–482 ......... .................... Holyoke Multimodal Center, MA ......................................................... 1,732,500

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–483 ......... .................... Intermodal Station Improvements, Salem and Beverly, MA .............. 1,188,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–484 ......... 563 Lawrence, MA, Gateway Intermodal and Quadant Area Reuse 

Project.

594,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–487 ......... .................... MART Advanced Vehicle Locator System (AVL), Massachusetts ..... 495,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1108 ....... .................... MART Maintenance facility expansion, Worcester County, MA ......... o 1,188,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–490 ......... 42 Medford, MA Downtown revitalization featuring construction of a 

200 space Park and Ride Facility.

380,714 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–491 ......... 257 Newburyport, MA Design and Construct Intermodal Facility ............. 380,714 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–492 ......... .................... North Leomister Parking Improvements, Massachusetts ................... 712,800 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–493 ......... .................... Public Transit for STCC College Students, Massachusetts ............... 381,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–494 ......... 139 Quincy, MA MBTA Purchase high speed catamaran ferry for Quincy 

Harbor Express Service.

380,714 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–495 ......... .................... Rapid Transit Handicap Accessibility, Newton, Massachusetts ......... 1,188,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–496 ......... 161 Revere, MA Inter-modal transit improvements in the Wonderland 

station (MBTA) area.

342,643 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–497 ......... 88 Rockport, MA Rockport Commuter Rail Station Improvements ......... 523,482 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–498 ......... 370 Salem, MA Design and Construct Salem Intermodal Transportation 

Center.

380,714 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–499 ......... 205 Woburn, MA Construction of an 89 space park and ride facility to 

be located on Magazine Hill, in the Heart of Woburn Square.

342,643 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–500 ......... 122 Baltimore, MD Construct Intercity Bus Intermodal Terminal .............. 951,786 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–501 ......... 499 City of Gaithersburg, Maryland-Bus and paratransit vehicle for seniors.110,880 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–502 ......... 303 Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations 

and Maintenance Facility.

951,786 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–503 ......... 542 Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations 

and Maintenance Facility.

247,500 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–504 ......... 571 MARC Intermodal Odenton and Edgewood Station Improvements ... 364,320 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–505 ......... 573 Maryland Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses ................................... 5,445,000 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–506 ......... .................... Maryland Statewide Bus Program ...................................................... 495,000 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–507 ......... 224 Montgomery County, MD Wheaton CBD Intermodal Access Program.95,179 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–508 ......... 214 Mount Rainier, MD Intermodal and Pedestrian Project ...................... 85,661 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–509 ......... .................... Silver Spring Transit Center, Maryland .............................................. 2,970,000 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–510 ......... 615 Silver Spring, Maryland, Transit Center ............................................. 6,930,000 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–511 ......... 8 Silver Spring, MD Construct Silver Spring Transit Center in downtown Silver Spring.694,804 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–512 ......... .................... Southern Maryland Commuter Bus Initiative ...................................... 1,980,000 

MD .... E–2006–BUSP–513 ......... 629 Southern Maryland Commuter Initiative ............................................. 2,673,000 

ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–514 ......... 19 Bar Harbor, ME Purchase new buses to enhance commuting near 

the Jackson Labs.

57,107 

ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–515 ......... 483 Campobello Park, ME, Bus Acquisition .............................................. 21,780 

ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–516 ......... .................... Intermodal Facility, Augusta, ME ........................................................ 693,000

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–518 ......... .................... 1st District Bus Replacement and Facilities, MI ................................. 1,980,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–519 ......... .................... Allegan County Transportation Services, MI ...................................... 88,110 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–1109 ....... .................... The Rapid ........................................................................................... p 1,287,000 

MI ...... E2006–BUSP–520 ........... .................... Automation Alley/BUSolutions, MI ...................................................... p 693,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–521 ......... 301 Barry County, MI-Barry County Transit equipments and dispatching 

software.

28,554 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–524 ......... .................... Berrien County Public Transportation, MI .......................................... 148,500 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–525 ......... 204 Boysville of Michigan Transportation System ..................................... 639,600 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–527 ......... .................... Cass County Transit, MI ..................................................................... 79,200 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–528 ......... 502 City of Kalamazoo, MI bus Replacement ........................................... 2,475,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–529 ......... .................... City of Midland Dial-A-Ride Section 5309, MI .................................... 362,340 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–530 ......... .................... Clare County Transit Administration Facility, MI ................................ 455,400 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–531 ......... .................... Communication Equipment and Bus, Belding, MI .............................. 75,240 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–532 ......... .................... Deneka Maintenance Facility, MI ....................................................... 495,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–540 ......... .................... Dowagiac Dial A Ride, MI ................................................................... 49,500 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–541 ......... 208 Eastern Upper Peninsula, MI Ferry Dock and Facility upgrades for 

Drummond Island Ferry Services.

47,589 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–543 ......... 526 Flint, MI, Mass Transportation Authority Bus Maintenance Facility ... 742,500 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–546 ......... .................... Greater Lapeer Transportation Authority, MI ...................................... 495,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–547 ......... .................... Harbor Transit, MI ............................................................................... 399,960 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–548 ......... .................... Hillsdale Dial-A-Ride, MI ..................................................................... 495,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–549 ......... 79 Ionia County, MI-Purchase and Implementation of communication 

equipment improvements.

112,311 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–550 ......... .................... Kalamazoo Metro Transit, MI ............................................................. 990,000


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13942 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–551 ......... .................... Kalkaska County Transportation Facility, MI ...................................... 396,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–555 ......... .................... Ludington Mass Transportation Authority ........................................... 316,801 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–556 ......... .................... Macatawa Area Express ..................................................................... 247,500 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–557 ......... 572 Marquette County, Michigan Transit Authority Bus passenger facility 297,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–558 ......... 581 Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Bus Replacement 1,980,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–976 ......... .................... Midland County Board of Commissioners Connection ....................... 495,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–559 ......... 293 Muskegon, Michigan-Muskegon Area Transit Terminal and related 

improvements.

380,714 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–561 ......... .................... Roscommon Transportation Authority Route Service ........................ 198,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–562 ......... .................... Sanilac Co. Transit Authority, MI ........................................................ 495,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–563 ......... .................... St. Joseph County Transit .................................................................. 79,200 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–564 ......... 634 Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) 

Bus Maintenance Facility.

880,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–566 ......... .................... Vehicle Acquisition for Ionia Dial-A-Ride, MI ...................................... 142,560 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–567 ......... .................... Yates Township Dial-A-Ride Transportation System, MI ................... 396,000 

MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–581 ......... .................... Twin Cities Dial A Ride ....................................................................... 88,110 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–568 ......... .................... Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit, Dakota County, MN ..................... 742,500 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–569 ......... .................... City of Northfield, MN Transit Station ................................................. 277,200 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–570 ......... 40 Duluth, MN Downtown Duluth Area Transit facility improvements .... 380,714 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–571 ......... 177 Fond du Lac Reservation, MN Purchase buses ................................ 28,554 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–572 ......... .................... Greater Minnesota Transit Capital ...................................................... 560,000 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–573 ......... .................... Greater Minnesota Transit Capitol—5309 Buses and Bus Facilities, 

Rock County.

495,000 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–574 ......... .................... I–35W BRT 46th Street Station, Minneapolis, MN ............................. 990,000 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–575 ......... 577 Metro Transit/Metropolitan Council, MN-Bus/Bus Capital .................. 2,154,240 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–576 ......... .................... Minnesota Transit Cap.—5309 Buses and Bus Facilities—St. Peter 247,500 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–577 ......... .................... Northwest Busway, Minneapolis, Minnesota ...................................... 990,000 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–578 ......... 185 St. Paul to Hinckley, MN Construct bus amenities along Rush Line 

Corridor.

285,536 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–579 ......... 342 St. Paul, MN Union Depot Multi Modal Transit Facility ...................... 380,714 

MN .... E–2006–BUSP–580 ......... .................... The UEL Bus Stop, University of Minnesota Twin Cities Transitway, 

MN.

49,500 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–585 ......... .................... City Utilities of Springfield bus facilities, MO ...................................... 1,633,500

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–587 ......... .................... Intermodal Transfer Facility at Duncan and Boyle, MO ..................... 693,000 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–589 ......... 345 Kansas City, MO Bus Transit Infrastructure ....................................... 61,005 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–1110 ....... .................... METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. ............... q 742,500 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–593 ......... 598 OATS, Incorporated, MO–ITS Information and Billing System and 

Bus Facilities.

3,855,060 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–595 ......... .................... South East Missouri Transportation Service, Missouri ....................... 635,580 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–596 ......... 624 Southeast Missouri Transportation Service-Bus Project .................... 453,420 

MO .... E–2006–BUSP–597 ......... .................... Southern Missouri Buses and Bus Facilities ...................................... 1,144,144 

MS ..... E–2006–BUSP–598 ......... 130 Coahoma County, Mississippi Purchase buses for the Aaron E. 

Henry Community Health Services Center, Inc./DARTS transit 

service.

28,554 

MS ..... E–2006–BUSP–599 ......... .................... Handicap Buses Desoto County, MS ................................................. 148,500 

MS ..... E–2006–BUSP–600 ......... .................... Inter-city Transit Companies, Meridian, MS ....................................... 198,000 

MS ..... E–2006–BUSP–601 ......... 547 Jackson State University, MS-Busing Project .................................... 1,133,550 

MS ..... E–2006–BUSP–602 ......... .................... JATRAN bus replacement, MS ........................................................... 544,500 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–603 ......... .................... Billings Public Bus and Transfer, MT ................................................. 1,237,500 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–604 ......... 129 Bozeman, Montana-Vehicular Parking Facility ................................... 761,459 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–605 ......... 476 Bozeman, MT, Intermodal and parking facility ................................... 166,320 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–606 ......... .................... Helena Transit Facility, MT ................................................................. 247,500 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–607 ......... .................... Kalispell Buses, MT ............................................................................ 99,000 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–608 ......... .................... Lewistown Bus Facility, Montana ....................................................... 297,000 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–609 ......... 584 Montana Department of Transportation-Statewide Bus Facilities and 

Buses.

680,130 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–610 ......... .................... Mountain Line Bus, Montana .............................................................. 498,250

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–611 ......... .................... Pablo Bus Facility, Montana ............................................................... 198,000 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–612 ......... .................... Pablo Buses, Montana ....................................................................... 148,500 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–613 ......... .................... Poplar Transit Facility Renovation, Montana ...................................... 79,200 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–614 ......... .................... Public Bus Transfer and Parking Facility, MT .................................... 1,237,500 

MT ..... E–2006–BUSP–615 ......... .................... University of Montana bus maintenance facility ................................. 247,500 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–616 ......... 490 Charlotte Area Transit System/City of Charlotte-Charlotte 

Multimodal Station.

203,030 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–617 ......... 217 Charlotte, NC Construct Charlotte Multimodal Station ....................... 1,484,786 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–618 ......... 351 Charlotte, North Carolina-Eastland Community Transit Center ......... 380,714 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–619 ......... 228 Charlotte, North Carolina-Multimodal Station ..................................... 761,429 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–620 ......... 154 City of Greenville, NC Expansion Buses and Greenville Intermodal 

Center.

678,433 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13943 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–622 ......... 302 Greensboro, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation Multimodal Transportation Center.2,383,273 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–623 ......... 52 Greensboro, North Carolina-Replacement buses .............................. 1,100,264 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–627 ......... 594 North Carolina Department of Transportation-North Carolina Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities.2,645,730 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–629 ......... .................... Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, NC ................................................ 43,600 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–632 ......... .................... Triangle Transit Authority Replacement Buses, North Carolina ........ 495,000 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–633 ......... 57 Wilmington, NC Build Intermodal Center ............................................ 190,357 

NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–634 ......... .................... Winston-Salem Union Station Intermodal Facility, NC ....................... 247,500 

ND ..... E–2006–BUSP–635 ......... 595 North Dakota Department of Transportation/Statewide Bus .............. 990,000 

ND ..... E–2006–BUSP–636 ......... .................... North Dakota Statewide Transit .......................................................... 1,237,500 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–637 ......... 505 City of Omaha-Creighton University Intermodal Facility .................... 680,130 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–638 ......... 160 Kearney, Nebraska-RYDE Transit Bus Maintenance and Storage 

Facility.

380,714 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–639 ......... 586 Nebraska Department of Roads-Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility for RYDE in Kearney, NE.453,420 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–640 ......... 587 Nebraska Department of Roads-Statewide Vehicles, Facilities, and 

Related Equipment Purchases.

906,840 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–641 ......... 240 Nebraska-statewide transit vehicles, facilities, and related equipment.761,429 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–642 ......... 599 Omaha, NE, Buses and Fare boxes .................................................. 603,900 

NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–643 ......... .................... StarTran Farebox Technology Upgrades, Nebraska .......................... 64,350 

NH ..... E–2006–BUSP–644 ......... 418 Windham, New Hampshire-Construction of Park and Ride Bus facility at Exit 3.704,322 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–645 ......... .................... Atlantic City Regional Medical Center Bus Project, NJ ...................... 247,500 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–646 ......... 468 Atlantic City, NJ Jitney ........................................................................ 742,500 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–647 ......... .................... Bergen Intermodal Stations and Park N’Rides, NJ ............................ 1,980,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–648 ......... .................... Bloomfield Intermodal Facilities and Park-and-Ride, NJ .................... 495,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–649 ......... 86 Burlington County, NJ-BurLink and Burlington County Transportation System vehicles and equipment.761,429 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–650 ......... 28 Camden, NJ Construction of the Camden County Intermodal Facility in Cramer Hill.190,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–651 ......... .................... Central NJ Intermodal Stations and Park & Rides ............................. 495,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–652 ......... 12 Hoboken, NJ Rehabilitation of Hoboken Inter-modal Terminal .......... 723,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–653 ......... 102 Jersey City, NJ Construct West Entrance to Pavonia-Newport 

PATH Station.

380,714 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–654 ......... .................... Kapkowski Road Transportation Planning Area Project, NJ .............. 495,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–655 ......... 389 Lakewood, NJ-Ocean County Bus service and parking facilities ....... 571,072 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–656 ......... 138 Long Branch, NJ Design and construct facilities for ferry service 

from Long Branch, NJ to New York City and other destinations.

761,429 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–657 ......... 38 Monmouth County, NJ Construction of main bus facility for Freehold 

Township, including a terminal and repair shop.

380,714 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–658 ......... .................... Morristown Intermodal Historic Station, NJ ........................................ 2,970,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–659 ......... 209 Morristown, New Jersey-Intermodal Historic Station .......................... 190,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–660 ......... 46 National Park Service Design and construct 2.1-mile segment to 

complete Sandy Hook multiuse pathway in Sandy Hook, NJ.

190,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–661 ......... 340 New Jersey Inter-modal Facilities and Bus Rolling Stock .................. 571,072 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–662 ......... 328 New Jersey Transit Community Shuttle Buses .................................. 95,179 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–663 ......... .................... Newark Penn Station Intermodal Improvements, New Jersey ........... 990,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–664 ......... 13 Newark, NJ Penn Station Intermodal Improvements including the 

rehabilitation of boarding areas.

190,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–665 ......... .................... NJ Transit Jitney Bus Replacement, Atlantic City .............................. 247,500 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–666 ......... .................... NW NJ Multi-County Intermodal Transit Initiative .............................. 990,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–667 ......... .................... Regional Intermodal Transportation, South Amboy, New Jersey ...... 495,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–668 ......... .................... Saint Peter’s McGrinley Square Intermodal Facility, New Jersey ...... 792,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–669 ......... 29 Sandy Hook, NJ National Park Service Construct year-round ferry 

dock at Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area.

190,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–670 ......... 393 South Amboy, NJ Construction of improvements to facilities at 

South Amboy Station under S Amboy, NJ Regional Intermodal 

Initiative.

1,522,858 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–671 ......... 618 South Brunswick, NJ Transit System ................................................. 990,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–672 ......... 643 Trenton Intermodal Station ................................................................. 5,445,000 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–673 ......... 61 Trenton, New Jersey-Trenton Train Station Rehabilitation ................ 285,536 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–674 ......... 181 Trenton, NJ Development of Trenton Trolley System ........................ 190,357 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–675 ......... 62 Trenton, NJ Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Trenton Train 

Station.

1,332,500 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–676 ......... .................... Valley Hospital Bus Transportation, NJ .............................................. 74,250 

NM .... E–2006–BUSP–681 ......... 562 Las Cruces, NM, Road Runner Bus and Bus Facilities ..................... 198,000 

NM .... E–2006–BUSP–682 ......... .................... Northern New Mexico Park and Ride ................................................. 445,500 

NM .... E–2006–BUSP–684 ......... .................... West Side Transit Facility, Albuquerque, NM ..................................... 816,750 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13944 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–685 ......... .................... Boulder Highway Max Bus Rapid Transit System, NV ...................... 445,500 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–686 ......... 405 Las Vegas, NV Construct Boulder Highway BRT system and purchase vehicles and related equipment.380,714 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–687 ......... 199 Las Vegas, NV Construct Central City Inter-modal Transportation 

Terminal.

1,142,143 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–688 ......... 371 Las Vegas, NV Construct Las Vegas West Care Intermodal Facility 47,589 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–689 ......... .................... Nevada Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, NV .................................. 2,970,000 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–690 ......... 603 Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada-Central 

City Intermodal Transportation Terminal.

906,840 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–693 ......... .................... RTC Transit Maintenance Facility, NV ............................................... 495,000 

NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–694 ......... 630 Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Public Transit Building Acquisition.297,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–696 ......... .................... Albany-Schenectady, NY Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY 

Route 5, Corridor.

57 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–698 ......... .................... Automated Light study along Route 59, NY ....................................... 99,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–699 ......... .................... Boro Park JCC Bus Purchase, NY ..................................................... 247,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–700 ......... 271 Bronx, NY Botanical Garden metro North Rail station Intermodal 

Facility.

190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–703 ......... 166 Bronx, NY Hebrew Home for the Aged elderly and disabled transportation support.35,692 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–704 ......... 338 Bronx, NY Intermodal Facility near Exit 6. of the Bronx River Parkway.47,589 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–705 ......... 234 Bronx, NY Jacobi Intermodal Center to North Central Bronx Hospital bus system.59,487 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–706 ......... 10 Bronx, NY Wildlife Conservation Society intermodal transportation 

facility at the Bronx Zoo.

83,282 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–707 ......... 197 Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ............. 266,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–708 ......... 408 Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility in the 

vicinity of Downstate Medical Center.

190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–709 ......... 41 Brooklyn, NY New Urban Center-Broadway Junction Intermodal 

Center.

182,743 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–710 ......... 56 Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station.761,429 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–711 ......... 419 Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station.761,429 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–712 ......... 192 Buffalo, NY Inter-modal Center Parking Facility ................................. 190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1111 ....... .................... White Plains for bus and bus facilities ............................................... r 198,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1112 ....... .................... Rockland County, NY , mini-buses for service in Clarkstown, NY .... r 99,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–714 ......... .................... Bus Facility 65th Intermodal Station, NY ............................................ 990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–715 ......... 245 Bus to provide Yorktown, New York internal circulator to provide 

transportation throughout the Town.

35,216 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–716 ......... .................... Central New York Regional Transportation Authority ........................ 1,485,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–717 ......... 230 Construction of Third Bus Depot on Staten Island ............................. 2,284,286 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–718 ......... 146 Cooperstown, New York-Intermodal Transit Center ........................... 951,786 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–719 ......... 363 Corning, New York-Transportation Center ......................................... 951,786 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–720 ......... 512 Corning, NY, Phase II Corning Preserve Transportation Enhancement Project.346,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–721 ......... 284 Cornwall, NY-Purchase Bus ............................................................... 16,561 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–722 ......... .................... Electric, Next-Generation Transit Buses, Broome County Transit, 

NY.

792,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–723 ......... 300 Geneva, New York-Multimodal facility-Construct passenger rail center.95,179 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–724 ......... .................... Intermodal transportation facility, Huntington Hospital, NY ................ 495,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–725 ......... 317 Jamestown, NY Rehabilitation of Intermodal Facility and associated 

property.

380,714 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–726 ......... 343 Kings County, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ..... 190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–727 ......... .................... Lakeside Center Hub, Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York ............... 693,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–728 ......... .................... Nassau County Hub and Centre, NY ................................................. 990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–729 ......... .................... Nassau County, New York Bus Replacement .................................... 990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–730 ......... 368 Nassau County, NY Conduct planning and engineering for transportation system (HUB).1,332,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–731 ......... 585 Nassau County, NY, Conduct planning, engineering, and construction for transportation system (HUB).990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–732 ......... 25 New York City, NY First Phase Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit System.190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–733 ......... 376 New York City, NY Purchase Handicapped-Accessible Livery Vehicles.190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–734 ......... 590 New York City, NY, Bronx Zoo Intermodal Facility ............................ 346,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–735 ......... 591 New York City, NY, Enhance Transportation Facilities Near W. 65th 

Street and Broadway.

346,500 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13945 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–736 ......... 592 New York City, NY, Highline Project, for Studies, Design, and Construction.990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–738 ......... .................... NFTA Hybrid Buses, Amherst, Erie County, New York ..................... 742,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–739 ......... 77 Niagara Falls, NY Relocation, Development, and Enhancement of 

Niagara Falls International Railway Station/Intermodal Transportation Center.

1,066,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–740 ......... .................... Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Buses, New York ............. 495,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–741 ......... 373 Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, NY Replacement Buses 190,357 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–742 ......... .................... North Hempstead Green Bus Fleet, New York .................................. 594,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–743 ......... 322 Oneonta, New York-bus replacement ................................................ 28,554 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–744 ......... 379 Ramapo, NY Transportation Safety Field Bus ................................... 47,589 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–745 ......... .................... Renaissance Square, NY ................................................................... 4,950,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–747 ......... 252 Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square transit center ................. 856,607 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–748 ......... 430 Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square Transit Center ............... 428,304 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–749 ......... 607 Rochester, NY, Renaissance Square Intermodal Facility, Design 

and Construction.

990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–750 ......... 609 Rockland County, NY Express Bus .................................................... 594,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–751 ......... .................... Seniors Transportation, Inc. Buses and Bus Facilities, New York ..... 99,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–752 ......... .................... St. George Terminal, Staten Island, NY ............................................. 990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–753 ......... .................... Suffolk County Buses and Bus Facilities, New York .......................... 396,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–754 ......... 386 Suffolk County, NY Design and construction of intermodal transit facility in Wyandanch.875,643 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–755 ......... 353 Suffolk County, NY Purchase four handicapped accessible vans to 

transport veterans to and from the VA facility in Northport.

53,300 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–756 ......... 635 Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University Connective Corridor 

Transit Project.

792,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–757 ......... 261 Thendra-Webb and Utica, New York-Install handicap lifts in intermodal centers.19,036 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–758 ......... .................... Third Bus Depot on Staten Island, NY—South Shore ....................... 1,980,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–759 ......... 289 Town of Warwick, NY Bus Facility Warwick Transit System ............. 104,696 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–760 ......... 451 Utica, New York Transit Multimodal Facilities .................................... 1,138,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–761 ......... 78 Utica, New York-Union Station Boehlert Center siding track improvements.19,036 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–762 ......... 182 Utica, New York-Union Station rehabilitation and related infrastructure improvements.95,179 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–763 ......... .................... Westchester County Bee-Line Bus Replacement, New York ............ 247,500 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–764 ......... 264 Westchester County, NY Bus replacement program ......................... 713,840 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–765 ......... 149 Yonkers, NY Trolley Bus Acquisition .................................................. 71,384 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–766 ......... 362 Akron, OH Construct City of Akron Commuter Bus Transit Facility .. 285,536 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–767 ......... 318 Akron, Ohio Construct Downtown Multi-modal Transportation Center.761,429 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–769 ......... .................... Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ............................. 1,485,000 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–770 ......... 489 Central Ohio Transit Authority-Paratransit and Small Bus Service 

Facility.

453,420 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–771 ......... 241 Cincinnati, Ohio-Construct Uptown Crossings Joint Development 

Transit Project.

571,072 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–772 ......... 89 Cincinnati, Ohio-Metro Regional Transit Hub Network Eastern 

Neighborhoods.

176,080 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–774 ......... 202 Cleveland, OH Construct Fare Collection System Project, Cuyahoga County.95,179 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–775 ......... 179 Cleveland, OH Construct passenger inter-modal center near Dock 

32.

163,707 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–776 ......... 411 Cleveland, OH Construction of an inter-modal facility and related 

improvements at University Hospitals facility on Euclid Avenue.

190,357 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–777 ......... .................... Cleveland, Ohio acquisition of buses Greater Cleveland Regional 

Transit Authority.

190,357 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–778 ......... 258 Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue and East 93rd Street intermodal facility.

1,618,036 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–779 ......... 198 Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue University Hospital intermodal facility.856,607 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–780 ......... 50 Cleveland, Ohio-University Circle Intermodal facility .......................... 1,618,036 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–782 ......... 7 Columbus, OH-Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility .... 532,478 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–783 ......... 292 Cuyahoga County, Ohio-Ohio Department of Transportation transit 

improvements.

28,554 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–784 ......... 120 Dayton Airport Inter-modal Rail Feasibility Study ............................... 142,768 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–785 ......... 516 Dayton-Wright Stop Plaza .................................................................. 453,420 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–786 ......... .................... Downtown Akron Transportation Center, OH ..................................... 297,000 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–788 ......... 309 Elyria, OH Construct the New York Central Train Station into an 

intermodal transportation hub.

389,851 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13946 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–789 ......... 349 Kent, OH Construct Kent State University Intermodal Facility serving students and the general public.190,357 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–790 ......... 104 Marietta, Ohio Construction of transportation hub to accommodate 

regional bus traffic.

95,179 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–791 ......... 576 Metro Regional Transit Authority/City of Akron-Downtown Transit 

Center/Akron.

1,587,960 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–792 ......... 87 Niles, OH Acquisition of bus operational and service equipment of 

Niles Trumbull Transit.

38,071 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–793 ......... .................... Ohio Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities ........................................... 5,204,615 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–795 ......... 385 Springfield, OH-City of Springfield Bus Transfer Station and Associated Parking.47,589 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–796 ......... .................... Tech Town Transportation Center, OH .............................................. 742,500 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–797 ......... 34 Toledo, OH TARTA/TARPS Passenger Inter-modal Facility construction.1,427,679 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–798 ......... .................... Uptown Crossings Joint Development Transit Project, Cincinnati, 

OH.

990,000 

OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–799 ......... 64 Zanesville, OH-bus system signage and shelters .............................. 15,467 

OK ..... E–2006–BUSP–800 ......... .................... Enhance Oklahoma Transit Association Public System .................... 495,000 

OK ..... E–2006–BUSP–801 ......... .................... Oklahoma DOT Transit Program Division .......................................... 495,000 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–802 ......... 442 Albany, OR North Albany Park and Ride ........................................... 181,293 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–803 ......... 165 Albany, OR Rehabilitate Building at Multimodal Transit Station ........ 290,068 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–804 ......... 272 Bend, Oregon-replacement vans ........................................................ 190,357 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–805 ......... 66 Canby, OR bus and bus facilities ....................................................... 28,554 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–806 ......... 187 Columbia County, OR To purchase buses ......................................... 26,650 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–809 ......... 325 Grants Pass, OR Purchase Vehicles For Use By Josephine Community Transit.38,752 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–810 ......... 99 Gresham, Oregon Construct a new light rail station and transit 

plaza on Portland MAX system and serve Gresham Civic neighborhood.

266,500 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–812 ......... 323 Lincoln, County, OR bus purchase ..................................................... 47,589 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–813 ......... 175 Molalla, OR South Clackamas Transportation District, bus purchase 19,036 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–814 ......... .................... Park and Ride Facility, Ashland, OR .................................................. 247,500 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–815 ......... 16 Portland, OR Renovation of Union Station, including structural reinforcement and public safety upgrades.19,036 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–816 ......... 93 Salem, OR bus and bus facilities ....................................................... 380,714 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–817 ......... .................... Sandy Transit Bus Facility, Oregon .................................................... 371,250 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–818 ......... 106 Sandy, Oregon Transit Bus Facility .................................................... 133,250 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–819 ......... .................... SMART Multi-Modal Transit Center and Bus Maintenance Facility, 

Oregon.

495,000 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–820 ......... 180 Tillamook, OR construction of a transit facility ................................... 19,036 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–821 ......... 216 Wilsonville, OR South Metro Area Rapid Transit, bus and bus facilities.47,589 

OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–822 ......... 82 Yamhill County, OR For the construction of bus shelters, park and 

ride facilities, and a signage strategy to increase ridership.

20,939 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–823 ......... .................... Adams Co. Transit Authority purchase of buses, PA ......................... 495,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–824 ......... 225 Allentown, Pennsylvania-Design and Construct Intermodal Transportation Center.380,714 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–825 ......... 456 Altoona Multimodal Transportation Facility Parking Garage .............. 227,700 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–827 ......... .................... Area Transit Authority, PA .................................................................. 990,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–828 ......... 467 Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania-Vehicle Replacements.226,710 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–831 ......... 471 Beaver County, PA Transit Authority Bus Replacement/Related 

Equipment Replacement.

226,710 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–832 ......... .................... Bucks County Intermodal Facility, PA ................................................ 495,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–833 ......... .................... Bus Purchase for Red Rose Transit Authority, Lancaster, PA .......... 742,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–835 ......... 481 Butler Township, PA-Cranbury Area Transit Service ......................... 793,980 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–839 ......... .................... Capital Area Transit (CAT), PA .......................................................... 742,500

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–840 ......... .................... Centre Area Transportation Intermodal Facility, PA ........................... 495,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–841 ......... 123 Cheltenham, PA Glenside Rail Station Parking Garage project involving the construction of a 300–400 space parking lot at Easton 

Road and Glenside Avenue.

190,357 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–842 ......... .................... Chestnut Hill Parking Foundation, Cheltenham, PA .......................... 247,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–843 ......... .................... Church Street Transportation Center, PA .......................................... 222,750 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–845 ......... .................... Coatesville Train Station, Coatesville, PA .......................................... 990,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–846 ......... 513 County of Lackawanna Transit System-Scranton Intermodal Transportation Center.226,710 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–847 ......... .................... County of Lebanon Transit (COLT), PA ............................................. 297,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–848 ......... .................... Crawford Intermodal Transportation Facility, PA ................................ 346,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–849 ......... 514 Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority-Purchase of 

Buses and Spare Units.

226,710 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13947 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–850 ......... .................... Easton Intermodal, PA ........................................................................ 396,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–851 ......... 81 Easton, Pennsylvania-Design and construct Intermodal Transportation Center.380,714 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–852 ......... .................... Endless Mountain Transportation Authority, Bradford County, PA .... 297,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–853 ......... 524 Erie, PA Metropolitan Transit Authority-Bus Acquisitions .................. 226,710 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–854 ......... 431 Erie, PA-EMTA Vehicle Acquisition .................................................... 380,714 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–855 ......... .................... Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation, PA ................................... 1,485,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–856 ......... .................... Gettysburg Bus and Bus Facilities, PA .............................................. 247,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–857 ......... 331 Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-transit transfer center ............................... 171,131 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–859 ......... 458 Hershey, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Garage ....... 56,925 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–860 ......... 233 Intermodal Facilities in Bucks County (Croydon and Levittown Stations).571,072 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–861 ......... 457 Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Facility.56,925 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–862 ......... .................... Lancaster Intermodal, Pennsylvania ................................................... 1,980,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–863 ......... 37 Lancaster, PA-bus replacement ......................................................... 180,839 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–864 ......... 559 Lancaster, PA-Intermodal Project ....................................................... 158,400 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–865 ......... 564 Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority, PA-Allentown 

Intermodal Transportation Center.

453,420 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–866 ......... .................... Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority, Pennsylvania ................................ 1,485,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–867 ......... 583 Monroe Township, PA-Clarion County Buses .................................... 149,490 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–868 ......... .................... Monroe Township/Clarion University Transit ...................................... 653,400 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–869 ......... .................... Montgomery County Intermodal, Pennsylvania .................................. 495,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–870 ......... 588 New Castle, PA Area Transit Authority-Bus Purchases/Park and 

Ride Facility.

168,300 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–871 ......... .................... Northumberland County Transportation, PA ...................................... 198,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–872 ......... .................... Paoli Transportation Center ................................................................ 1,980,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–873 ......... 201 Philadelphia, PA Cruise Terminal Transportation Ctr. Phila. Naval 

Shipyard.

666,250 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–874 ......... 137 Philadelphia, PA Improvements to the existing Penn’s Landing 

Ferry Terminal.

761,429 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–875 ......... 413 Philadelphia, PA Penn’s Landing water shuttle parking lot expansion and water shuttle ramp infrastructure construction.209,393 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–876 ......... 22 Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Zoo Intermodal Transportation project 

w/parking consolidation, pedestrian walkways, public transportation complements & landscape improvements to surface parking lots.

951,786 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–877 ......... 274 Philadelphia, PA SEPTA’s Market St. Elevated Rail project in conjunction with Philadelphia Commercial Development Corporation 

for improvements and assistance to entities along rail corridor.

266,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–878 ......... 316 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-SEPTA Market Street Elevated Line 

parking facility.

761,429 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–879 ......... 126 Pittsburgh, PA Clean Fuel Bus Procurement ..................................... 95,179 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–880 ......... .................... Port Authority of Allegheny County Bus Acquisition, Pennsylvania ... 3,069,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–881 ......... 397 Pottsville, PA Union Street Trade and Transfer Center Intermodal 

Facility.

380,714 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–882 ......... 48 Project provides for the engineering and construction of a transportation center in Paoli, Chester County.190,357 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–884 ......... 424 Sharon, PA-Bus Facility Construction ................................................ 95,179 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–885 ......... .................... Shenango Valley Shuttle Service, Pennsylvania ................................ 247,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–351 ......... 96 SEPTA Montgomery County Intermodal Improvements at Glenside 

and Jenkintown Station Parking Garages.

s 951,786 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–886 ......... 626 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Bucks County 

Intermodal (Croydon and Levittown).

680,130 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–887 ......... 627 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Paoli Transportation Center.680,130 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–888 ......... 628 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-VillanovaSEPTA Intermodal.680,130 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–890 ......... .................... Union Station Intermodal Trade and Transit Center, Pennsylvania ... 1,237,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–891 ......... .................... Union/Snyder Transportation Authority Union County, PA ................ 990,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–893 ......... 660 Westmoreland County Transit Authority, PA-Bus Replacement ........ 226,710 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–894 ......... .................... Westmoreland Transit Authority, Pennsylvania .................................. 742,500 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–896 ......... .................... Williamsport Trade and Transit Centre Expansion, Pennsylvania ..... 668,250 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–897 ......... 662 Williamsport, PA Bureau of Transportation-Williamsport Trade and 

Transit Centre Expansion.

680,130 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–900 ......... 128 Bayamon, Puerto Rico-bus terminal ................................................... 114,214 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–901 ......... 421 Bayamon, Puerto Rico-Purchase of Trolley Cars .............................. 161,804 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–902 ......... 3 Lares, PR-Trolley buses-for the purchase of two trolley buses that 

will offer transportation through the urban zone in the Municipality 

of Lares.

50,254 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13948 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–903 ......... 164 Puerto Rico-Caribbean National Forest bus and bus facilities .......... 571,072 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–904 ......... 152 San Juan, Puerto Rico-bus security equipment ................................. 571,072 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–905 ......... 71 San Juan, Puerto Rico-Buses ............................................................ 190,357 

PR ..... E–2006–BUSP–906 ......... 58 Yabucoca, Puerto Rico-Trolley Buses ................................................ 33,313 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–907 ......... 246 Providence, RI Expansion of Elmwood Paratransit Maintenance Facility.951,786 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–908 ......... .................... Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Elmwood Avenue Maintenance Facility Improvements.1,227,600 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–909 ......... .................... Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Transit Security Improvements.198,000 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–910 ......... 115 Rhode Island Statewide Bus Fleet ..................................................... 1,142,143 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–911 ......... .................... Rhode Island Statewide Vehicle Replacement .................................. 495,000 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–912 ......... 604 Rhode Island, RIPTA Elmwood Facility Expansion ............................ 1,584,000 

RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–913 ......... .................... Warwick Para-Transit Vehicles, Rhode Island ................................... 133,650 

SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–914 ......... 533 Greensville, SC Transit Authority-City of Greenville Multimodal 

Transportation Center Improvements.

226,710 

SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–915 ......... 619 South Carolina Department of Transportation-Transit Facilities Construction Program.453,420 

SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–916 ......... 620 South Carolina Department of Transportation-Vehicle Acquisition 

Program.

1,814,670 

SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–917 ......... .................... Vehicle Acquisition, SC ....................................................................... 1,584,000 

SD ..... E–2006–BUSP–918 ......... .................... Pine Ridge Transit System, South Dakota ......................................... 594,000 

SD ..... E–2006–BUSP–919 ......... 621 South Dakota Department of Transportation-Statewide Buses and 

Bus Facilities.

1,380,820 

SD ..... E–2006–BUSP–920 ......... .................... Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, SD ................................................ 1,665,660 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–922 ......... .................... Knoxville Electric Transit Intermodal Center, TN ............................... 990,000 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–923 ......... 237 Knoxville, Tennessee-Central Station Transit Center ........................ 1,941,643 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–924 ......... 554 Knoxville, TN-Central Station .............................................................. 567,270 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–925 ......... 565 Lipscomb University, TN-Intermodal Parking Garage ........................ 340,560 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–926 ......... .................... Memphis Airport Intermodal Facility, Tennessee ............................... 1,361,250 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–928 ......... 268 Nashville, TN Construct a parking garage on the campus of 

Lipscomb University, Nashville.

380,714 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–930 ......... 30 Sevier County, Tennessee-U.S. 441 bus rapid transit ....................... 47,589 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–931 ......... .................... Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency .............................. 495,000 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–932 ......... .................... Tennessee Department of Transportation Buses and Bus Facilities 477,570 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–933 ......... 636 Tennessee Department of Transportation-Statewide Tennessee 

Transit ITS and Bus Replacement Project.

2,721,510 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–934 ......... .................... TN DOT Job Access Reverse Commute ........................................... 495,000 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–935 ......... .................... TN Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities ................................................. 5,102,430 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–936 ......... 649 University of Memphis-Pedestrian Bridge .......................................... 680,130 

TN ..... E–2006–BUSP–937 ......... .................... Upper Cumberland Human Resource Agency, Tennessee ............... 346,500 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–938 ......... 426 Abilene, TX Vehicle replacement and facility improvements for transit system.76,143 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–939 ......... .................... Brazos Transit District Bus Replacement, TX .................................... 123,750 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–940 ......... .................... Brazos Transit District, Capital Cost Contracting, TX ........................ 990,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–943 ......... 153 Bryan, TX The District-Bryan Intermodal Transit Terminal and Parking Facility.571,072 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–945 ......... .................... Bus Shelters, Dallas, TX ..................................................................... 495,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–946 ......... .................... Bus/Vehicle Replacement, Lufkin, TX ................................................ 297,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–947 ......... .................... Capital Metro Expansion and Improvement, TX ................................ 2,079,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–948 ......... .................... Capital Metro North Operating Facility, TX ........................................ 495,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–949 ......... .................... Capital Metro Rapid Bus Project, TX ................................................. 742,500 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–950 ......... 485 Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, TX-Bus Replacements.2,268,090 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–951 ......... 455 Carrollton, Texas Downtown Regional Multimodal Transit Hub ......... 227,700 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–953 ......... .................... City of El Paso Sun Metro Bus Replacement, TX ............................. 1,980,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–954 ......... .................... City of Lubbock Citibus Improvement, TX .......................................... 495,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–955 ......... 506 City of Round Rock, TX-Downtown Intermodal Transportation Terminal.

226,710 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–957 ......... .................... Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Buses, TX ...................................... 990,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–958 ......... 111 Construct West Houston and Fort Bend County, Texas-bus transit 

corridor.

380,714 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–959 ......... .................... Corpus Christi Bus and Bus Facilities, TX ......................................... 79,200 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–960 ......... 438 Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Regional Transit Authority for maintenance facility improvements.475,893 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–961 ......... 515 Dallas Area Rapid Transit-Bus passenger Facilities .......................... 226,710 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–962 ......... 336 Dallas, TX Bus Passenger Facilities .................................................. 2,436,572 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–963 ......... 196 Design Downtown Carrollton, Texas Regional Multi-Modal Transit 

Hub Station.

380,714 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–964 ......... .................... Enhancements to Bus Terminal in McAllen, TX ................................. 495,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13949 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–965 ......... .................... Fort Bend Co, TX, Park & Ride .......................................................... 495,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–966 ......... 290 Galveston, Texas-Intermodal center and parking facility, The Strand 856,607 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–967 ......... 536 Harris County-West Houston-Fort Bend Bus Transit Corridor: Uptown Westpark Terminal.226,710 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–968 ......... .................... Hill County Transit Administration Facility, TX ................................... 337,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–969 ......... .................... Houston METRO Bus Transit Centers, TX ........................................ 2,009,700 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–970 ......... .................... Hunt County Committee on Aging, TX ............................................... 495,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–972 ......... 561 Laredo-North Laredo Transit Hub-Bus Maintenance Facility ............. 680,130 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–973 ......... .................... Lubbock/Citibus Low-Floor Buses, Paratransit Vans and Facilities, 

and Passenger Amenities, TX.

79,200 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–974 ......... .................... Midland Bus Facilities, Texas ............................................................. 79,200 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–975 ......... .................... Midland Bus Facilities, TX .................................................................. 49,500 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–977 ......... .................... Rolling Stock for HCTD Urban System, TX ....................................... 1,485,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–978 ......... 24 Roma, TX Bus Facility ........................................................................ 99,938 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–979 ......... 610 San Angelo, TX Street Railroad Company-Transit Fleet Replacement.

226,710 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–982 ......... .................... The District-Bryan/College Station Bus Replacement, Texas ............ 495,000 

TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–984 ......... 63 Zapata, Texas Purchase Bus vehicles ............................................... 59,487 

UT ..... E–2006–BUSP–985 ......... .................... Brigham City Buses and Bus Facilities, UT ....................................... 148,500 

UT ..... E–2006–BUSP–986 ......... .................... Commuter Rail Hub Planning and Renovation of the Historic 

Brigham City Train Depot, UT.

74,250 

UT ..... E–2006–BUSP–987 ......... .................... Ogden Buses and Bus Facilities, UT ................................................. 247,500 

UT ..... E–2006–BUSP–990 ......... .................... Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, Utah ............................................. 1,274,427 

UT ..... E–2006–BUSP–995 ......... .................... West Valley City Intermodal Terminal, Utah ...................................... 211,250 

UT ..... E–2006–BUSP–996 ......... .................... Westminster College Intermodal Transportation Facilities Expansion 

for Shuttle Buses, Utah.

1,237,500 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–997 ......... .................... Alexandria Transit Service Improvements, VA ................................... 990,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–998 ......... 409 Alexandria, VA Eisenhower Avenue Inter-modal Station improvements, including purchase of buses and construction of bus shelters.475,893 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–999 ......... 232 Alexandria, VA Royal Street Bus Garage Replacement .................... 95,179 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1000 ....... .................... Arlington County Bus Transfer Facility, VA ........................................ 396,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1001 ....... 278 Arlington County, VA Columbia Pike Bus Improvements .................. 666,250 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1002 ....... 142 Arlington County, VA Crystal City-Potomac Yard Busway, including 

construction of bus shelters.

571,072 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1003 ....... 359 Arlington County, VA Pentagon City Multimodal Improvements ........ 380,714 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1004 ....... 157 Bealeton, Virginia-Intermodal Station Depot Refurbishment .............. 52,348 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1005 ....... .................... Blacksburg Transit Intermodal Facility, VA ......................................... 198,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1006 ....... .................... Buses and Bus Facilities, Danville, VA .............................................. 297,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1007 ....... 492 City of Alexandria, VA-City-Wide Transit Improvements .................... 226,710 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1008 ....... 493 City of Alexandria, VA-Potomac Yard Transit Improvements ............ 226,710 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1009 ....... 494 City of Alexandria, VA-Replace Royal Street Bus Garage ................ 680,130 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1010 ....... 495 City of Alexandria, VA-Valley Pedestrian & Transit ........................... 226,710 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1011 ....... 511 Commonwealth of Virginia-Statewide Bus Capital Program .............. 3,401,640 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1012 ....... 15 Fairfax County, VA Richmond Highway (U.S. Route1) Public Transportation Improvements.380,714 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1013 ....... 525 Fairfax County, Virginia-Richmond Highway Initiative ........................ 453,420 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1014 ....... 281 Falls Church, VA Falls Church Intermodal Transportation Center ..... 380,714 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1015 ....... 97 Fredericksburg, Virginia-Improve and repair Fredericksburg Station 475,893 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1016 ....... .................... Greater Lynchburg Transit Company Vehicle Replacement, VA ....... 396,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1019 ....... .................... Hampton Roads Southside Bus Facility, VA ...................................... 990,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1020 ....... .................... Hampton Roads Transit Bus Facilities, VA ........................................ 2,227,500 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1021 ....... 535 Hampton Roads Transit, VA-Southside Bus Facility .......................... 226,710 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1022 ....... 391 Hampton Roads, VA Final design and construction for a Hampton 

Roads Transit Southside Bus Facility.

380,714 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1023 ....... .................... Jamestown 2007 Natural Gas Bus purchase, VA .............................. 247,500 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1024 ....... 354 Norfolk, Virginia-Final Design and Construction Southside Bus Facility.333,125 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1025 ....... 68 Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula, Virginia-Bay Transit 

Multimodal Facilities.

618,661 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1026 ....... .................... Park-and-Ride Lot, Springfield, VA ..................................................... 990,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1027 ....... .................... Petersburg Multi-Modal Transit Center, VA ........................................ 495,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1028 ....... .................... Petersburg Transit Intermodal Facility, VA ......................................... 297,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1029 ....... 602 Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, VA-Buses 

for Service Expansion.

226,710 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1030 ....... .................... Potomac and Rappahannock Transit Commission Buses for service 

expansion, VA.

1,188,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1031 ....... .................... Richmond Highway Public Transportation Initiative, VA .................... 2,376,000 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1033 ....... 184 Richmond, VA Renovation and construction for Main Street Station 209,393 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1034 ....... 434 Roanoke, VA-Bus restoration in the City of Roanoke ........................ 47,589 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13950 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1035 ....... 312 Roanoke, Virginia-Improve Virginian Railway Station ........................ 47,589 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1036 ....... 305 Roanoke, Virginia-Intermodal Facility ................................................. 38,071 

VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1037 ....... 361 Roanoke, Virginia-Roanoke Railway and Link Passenger facility ...... 95,179 

VI ....... E–2006–BUSP–1038 ....... .................... Virgin Island Transit VITRAN, Virgin Islands ...................................... 297,000 

VT ..... E–2006–BUSP–1116 ....... .................... Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont.

t 990,000 

VT ..... E–2006–BUSP–1040 ....... 477 Brattleborough, VT, Intermodal Center ............................................... 594,000 

VT ..... E–2006–BUSP–1041 ....... .................... Burlington Transit Facilities, VT .......................................................... 990,000 

VT ..... E–2006–BUSP–1042 ....... 486 CCTA, VT, Bus, Facilities and Equipment ......................................... 297,000 

VT ..... E–2006–BUSP–1043 ....... 633 State of Vermont Buses, Facilities and Equipment ............................ 247,500 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1044 ....... .................... Ben Franklin Transit, Maintenance and Operations Facility, WA ...... 495,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1046 ....... .................... Everett Transit, Bus and Paratransit Vehicle Replacement, WA ....... 816,750 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1048 ....... .................... Grays Harbor Transit, Transit Center Expansion, WA ....................... 772,200 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1050 ....... 395 Ilwaco, WA Construct park and ride ................................................... 19,036 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1051 ....... 94 Ilwaco, WA Procure shuttles for Lewis and Clark National Historical 

Park.

19,036 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1053 ....... 337 Island Transit, WA Operations Base Facilities Project ....................... 456,857 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1055 ....... .................... King County Airfield Transfer Area, WA ............................................. 1,188,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1058 ....... .................... Link Transit Low Floor Coaches Chelan/Leavenworth, WA ............... 495,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1061 ....... 334 North Bend, Washington-Park and Ride ............................................ 152,286 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1062 ....... 333 Oak Harbor, WA Multimodal Facility .................................................. 190,357 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1063 ....... .................... Port Angeles International Gateway Project, Washington ................. 792,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1065 ....... .................... Puyallup Transit Center Park and Ride, Washington ......................... 772,200 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1066 ....... 613 Seattle, WA Multimodal Terminal Redevelopment & Expansion ....... 792,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1068 ....... .................... Skagit Transit Chuckanut Dr. Station in Burlington, Washington ....... 297,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1069 ....... 113 Snohomish County, WA Community Transit bus purchases and facility enhancement.571,072 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1071 ....... .................... SW King County-Highline CC Intermodal Transit Facility and Parking Garage.841,500 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1072 ....... 151 Thurston County, WA Replace Thurston County Buses .................... 171,321 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1075 ....... 654 Washington Southworth Terminal Redevelopment ............................ 990,000 

WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1076 ....... 655 Washington, King Street Transportation Center-Intercity Bus Terminal Component.49,500 

WI ...... E–2006–BUSP–1077 ....... .................... 7th District Buses and Bus Facilities, WI ........................................... 968,547 

WI ...... E–2006–BUSP–1080 ....... 452 State of Wisconsin Transit Intermodal Facilities ................................ 1,138,500 

WI ...... E–2006–BUSP–1081 ....... .................... Wisconsin Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities .................................. 8,000 

WV .... E–2006–BUSP–1083 ....... 73 West Virginia Construct Beckley Intermodal Gateway pursuant to 

the eligibility provisions for projects listed under section 

3030(d)(3) of P.L. 105–178.

4,568,573 

WY .... E–2006–BUSP–1085 ....... 665 Wyoming Department of Transportation-Wyoming Statewide Bus 

and Bus Related Facilities.

680,130 

Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... $565,807,839 

FY 2006 Unobligated Ferry Boat Systems Allocations: 

CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1086 ....... .................... San Francisco Water Transit Authority ............................................... 2,475,000 

MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1087 ....... .................... Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ferry System .............. 2,475,000 

ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–1088 ....... .................... Maine State Ferry Service, Rockland ................................................. 643,500 

ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–1089 ....... .................... Swans Island, Maine Ferry Service .................................................... 346,500 

NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–1090 ....... .................... Camden, New Jersey Ferry System ................................................... 990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1091 ....... .................... Governor’s Island, New York Ferry System ....................................... 990,000 

NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1092 ....... .................... Staten Island Ferry ............................................................................. 990,000 

PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1093 ....... .................... Philadelphia Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal ...................................... 990,000 

Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Ferry Boat Systems Allocations ...................................................................................... $9,900,000 

FY 2006 Unobligated Other Project Allocations: 

E–2006–BUSP–1094 ....... .................... Fuel Cell Bus Program ....................................................................... 11,137,500 

Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Other Project Allocations ................................................................................................. $11,137,500 

FY 2006 Unallocated 

Amount.

.................... ............................................................................................................. 24,893,251 

Total FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations ............................................................................................................................. $611,738,590 

Unobligated Allocations Grand Total ................................................................................................................................ $861,331,362 

Fiscal Years 2002, 2003 and 2004 Extended Allocations: 

AK ..... E–2003–BUSP–801 ......... .................... Anchorage International Airport Intermodal Facility, 2003 ................. u $1,967,357 

CA ..... E–2002–BUSP–601 ......... .................... Orange County Transportation Authority ............................................ v $247,507 

CA ..... E–2004–BUSP–049 ......... .................... Hybrid buses in Eureka, CA 2004 ...................................................... w 242,718 

MT ..... E–2002–BUSP–319 ......... .................... Statewide bus and bus facilities, MT 2002 ......................................... x 806,496 

NV ..... E–2003–BUSP–802 ......... .................... Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada for bus 

facilities, including bus rapid transit projects.

y 4,918,393 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13951 

TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project Unobligated allocation 

NY ..... E–2003–BUSP–705 ......... .................... Buffalo, New York Inner Harbor Redevelopment Project ................... z 4,918,393 

NY ..... E–2002–BUSP–600 ......... .................... City of Poughkeepsie for bus and bus facilities ................................. aa 320,000 

NY ..... E–2003–BUSP–706 ......... .................... Oneida County buses and transit items, 2003 ................................... ab 885,311 

Total Extended Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ $14,306,175 

aFunds originally designated for the Metro Red Line Wilshire Vermont Station (E–2005–BUSP–057) shall be available to the Los Angeles 

County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for bus and bus facility improvements. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter 

May 12, 2006). bFunds originally designated for Sistrunk Transit and Pedestrian Access Improvement, FL (E–2005–BUSP–120) are now made available to implement bus stop, bus pullout and transit improvements consistent with the City of Ft. Lauderdale Community Redevelopment Agency plan. (July 

7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 12, 2006). cFunds originally designated for White Earth Tribal Nation Transit Center, MN/White Earth Tribal Nation Transit Center (E–2005–BUSP–703) 

shall be available for the purchase of buses for the White Earth Tribal Nation bus and bus related activities, MN. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to 

Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 25, 2005). dFunds originally designated for JATRAN fixed route vehicles, Mississippi shall now be made available to the City of Jackson, Mississippi, of 

which up to $2,000,000 shall be available for pedestrian access to the Jackson intermodal facility, beautification to bridge structure and brickwork. (October 13, 2005 response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 25, 2005). eFunds originally designated for Tulsa Transit Multi-Use facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma shall be available for Transit buses and equipment in 

Tulsa. (October 13, 2005, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter of May 25, 2005). fThe project is a multimodal parking facility. (October 13, 2005 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter of May 25, 2005). 

gPeriod of availability extended to September 30, 2008 by reprogramming. 

hThis allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. iFunds originally designated for Sun Tran CNG Buses and Facilities made available to purchase bio-diesel vehicles in Tucson, AZ. (July 7, 

2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter May 12, 2006). 

jFunds originally designated for Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery, CA (E–2006–BUSP–100) shall now be available to the Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery Science Center, Santa Ana, CA. The redirected funds are awarded to a State or local government entity and expended on activities that meet the buses criteria set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5309. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter 

May 12, 2006). kThis allocation was incorrectly listed as a Illinois project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. lThe Statement of the Managers accompanying in the Fiscal Year 2006 DOT Appropriations bill includes $2,250,000 for GRTA Xpress Implement Buses. The funds shall be made available for both bus and bus facilities. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenbeng/Bond letter May 12, 

2006). m This allocation was incorrectly listed as a California project and had the wrong project description in the Federal Register Notice of February 

3, 2006. nApril 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006, listed specific projects for which funds were made available. 

$342,000 was previously obligated leaving a remaining balance of $54,000, for Lincoln County Senior Citizen Bus, Kentucky. oFunds originally designated for MART Maintenance Facility, Fitchburg, MA. (E–2006–BUSP–488), shall be available for the MART maintenance facility expansion, Worcester County, MA. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). pFunds originally designated for Automation Alley/BUSolutions, MI (E–2006–BUSP–520), $1,300,000 made available to The Rapid, the transit 

provider in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area, for bus acquisition. $700,000 remains available to Automation Alley/BUSsolutions in Michigan. 

(April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006). qFunds originally designated for METRO St. Louis Downtown Shuttle Trolley, MO. (E–2006–BUSP–591), shall be available for the METRO 

Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). rFunds originally designated for bus and bus facilities Clarkstown and White Plains, NY (E–2006–BUSP–713), $200,000 made available to 

White Plains for bus and bus facilities. $100,000 made available to Rockland County, NY, to procure mini-buses for service in Clarkstown, NY. 

(April 12, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006). sThis allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. tThe Statement of the Managers accompanying the Fiscal Year 2005 DOT Appropriations bill (H. Rpt. 108–792) includes $2,000,000 under the 

Bus and Bus Facilities for Bellows Falls Transit Improvements, Vermont (E–2005–BUSP–424). In addition, the Statement of the Managers accompanying the Fiscal Year 2006 DOT Appropriations bill includes $1,000,000 under the Bus and Bus Facilities for the Bellows Falls Multimodal 

Facility, VT (E–2006–BUSP–1039). It is the intent of the conferees that remaining funds be made available to a State or local governmental entity, who may apply on behalf of Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of December 19, 2006). u It is the intent of the conferees that these funds shall be available for projects related to this facility through Fiscal Year 2007, including related surface transportation projects. (November 26, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). vThe committee directs that amounts made available in Fiscal Year 2002 for Costa Mesa CNG facility, shall now be made available for Orange County Transportation Authority. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of December 19, 2006). w Funds originally designated for Bus and Bus facilities for the Eureka Intermodal Depot, CA (E–2004–BUSP–049), shall be available for the 

purchase of hybrid buses in Eureka, CA. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). x Reprogrammed in FY 2005 (H. Rept. 108–792). yThe committee directs that amounts made available in fiscal year 2003 for Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, shall 

now be made available for the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada for bus and bus facilities, including bus rapid transit 

projects. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of September 29, 2006). z Reprogrammed in FY 2005 (H. Rept. 4818, Sec. 527). 

aaThe committee directs that amounts made available in Fiscal Year 2002 for the City of Middletown buses and bus facilities shall be redirected for the City of Poughkeepsie for bus and bus facilities. (April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of January 12, 2006). ab Reprogrammed in FY 2005 from original earmark Utica Transit Authority Buses (H. Rept. 108–192). 

TABLE 14.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID Project location and description Allocation 

Alaska .................................... D2007–NWST–001 ............... Denali Commission ............................................................... $5,000,000 

Alaska/Hawaii ........................ D2007–NWST–002 ............... Alaska and Hawaii Ferry ....................................................... 15,000,000 

Arizona ................................... D2007–NWST–003 ............... Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT .......................................... 90,000,000 

California ................................ D2007–NWST–004 ............... Metro Gold Line Eastside Light Rail Extension .................... 100,000,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13952 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 14.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID Project location and description Allocation 

California ................................ D2007–NWST–005 ............... Mission Valley East ............................................................... 806,654 

California ................................ D2007–NWST–006 ............... Oceanside Escondido Rail Project ........................................ 684,040 

California ................................ D2007–NWST–007 ............... BART Extension to San Francisco International Airport ....... 2,424,694 

Colorado ................................ D2007–NWST–008 ............... Southeast Corridor LRT ........................................................ 80,000,000 

Colorado ................................ D2007–NWST–009 ............... West Corridor LRT ................................................................ 35,000,000 

District of Columbia/Maryland D2007–NWST–026 ............... Largo Metrorail Extension ..................................................... 35,000,000 

Illinois ..................................... D2007–NWST–010 ............... Douglas Branch Reconstruction ............................................ 1,573,675 

Illinois ..................................... D2007–NWST–011 ............... Ravenswood Line Extension ................................................. 40,000,000 

Illinois ..................................... D2007–NWST–012 ............... Union–Pacific West Line Extension ...................................... 1,255,978 

Maryland ................................ D2007–NWST–013 ............... Central Light Rail Double Track ............................................ 482,822 

North Carolina ........................ D2007–NWST–014 ............... South Corridor LRT ............................................................... 70,744,065 

New Jersey ............................ D2007–NWST–015 ............... Hudson–Bergen MOS–2 ....................................................... 100,000,000 

New York ............................... D2007–NWST–016 ............... Long Island Rail Road Eastside Access ............................... 300,000,000 

Ohio ....................................... D2007–NWST–017 ............... Euclid Corridor Transportation Project .................................. 693,013 

Oregon ................................... D2007–NWST–018 ............... Interstate MAX LRT Extension .............................................. 542,940 

Oregon ................................... D2007–NWST–019 ............... South Corridor I–205/Portland Mall LRT ............................... 80,000,000 

Oregon ................................... D2007–NWST–020 ............... Wilsonville to Beaverton ........................................................ 27,600,000 

Pennsylvania .......................... D2007–NWST–021 ............... North Shore LRT Connector ................................................. 55,000,000 

Puerto Rico ............................ D2007–NWST–022 ............... Tren Urbano .......................................................................... 2,670,518 

Texas ..................................... D2007–NWST–023 ............... Northwest/Southeast LRT MOS ............................................ 80,000,000 

Utah ....................................... D2007–NWST–024 ............... Weber County to Salt Lake City Commuter Rail .................. 80,000,000 

Washington ............................ D2007–NWST–025 ............... Central Link Initial Segment .................................................. 80,000,000 

................................................ ................................................ Unallocated Balance ............................................................. 265,861,601 

Total Allocation ....................................................................................................................................................................... $1,550,340,000 

TABLE 15.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID Project Location and Description Unobligated allocation 

FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations: 

AK, HI E2005–NWST–000 .......... Hawaii and Alaska Ferry Boats .................................................................................. $3,000,000 

AL ..... E2005–NWST–001 .......... Birmingham, Alabama, Transit Corridor ..................................................................... 992,000 

CA ..... E2005–NWST–007 .......... San Diego, California, Mid-Coast Light Rail Extension .............................................. 340,320 

CA ..... E2005–NWST–012 .......... Santa Clara County, California, Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor ...................... 2,480,000 

LA ..... E2005–NWST–022 .......... New Orleans, Louisiana, Canal Street Streetcar Project ........................................... 16,455,206 

MN .... E2005–NWST–027 .......... Minneapolis, Minnesota, Northstar Commuter Rail Project ........................................ 4,960,000 

NV ..... E2005–NWST–035 .......... CATRAIL RTC Rail Project, Nevada .......................................................................... 992,000 

NV ..... E2005–NWST–036 .......... Las Vegas, Nevada, Resort Corridor Fixed Guideway Project .................................. 29,760,000 

PA ..... E2005–NWST–042 .......... Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Corridor One ..................................................................... 1,284,000 

PA ..... E2005–NWST–043 .......... Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Schuylkill Valley MetroRail ............................................ 9,920,000 

PR ..... E2005–NWST–046 .......... San Juan, Puerto Rico, Tren Urbano Rapid Transit System ..................................... 16,853,570 

RI ...... E2005–NWST–047 .......... Rhode Island, Integrated Intermodal Project .............................................................. 4,436,537

TX ..... E2005–NWST–049 .......... Capital Metro–Bus Rapid Transit Texas ..................................................................... 992,000 

TX ..... E2005–NWST–051 .......... Houston Advanced Metro Transit Plan, Texas ........................................................... 446,360 

VA ..... E2005–NWST–055 .......... Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project, Virginia ........................................................... 24,800,000 

.......................................... Unallocated Amount 672,344 

Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... $118,384,337 

FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations: 

AK, HI E2006–NWST–001 .......... Alaska and Hawaii Ferry ............................................................................................. $5,262,406 

CA ..... E2006–NWST–010 .......... Santa Barbara Coast Rail Track Improvement Project .............................................. 980,100 

CA ..... E2006–NWST–003 .......... ACE Gap Closure San Joaquin County ..................................................................... 4,900,500 

CA ..... E2006–NWST–011 .......... Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Project, Santa Clara County ........................... 6,370,650 

CA ..... E2006–NWST–005 .......... Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit Extension ...................................................................... 7,017,516 

CA ..... E2006–NWST–006 .......... Mission Valley East ..................................................................................................... 7,546,770 

CT ..... E2006–NWST–014 .......... Hartford-New Britain Busway Project ......................................................................... 5,880,600 

CT ..... E2006–NWST–015 .......... Stamford Urban Transitway ........................................................................................ 9,801,000 

DE ..... E2006–NWST–016 .......... Northeast Corridor Commuter Rail Project ................................................................. 1,396,643

FL ..... E2006–NWST–019 .......... Ft. Lauderdale Downtown Rail Link ............................................................................ 980,100 

FL ..... E2006–NWST–018 .......... City of Miami Streetcar ............................................................................................... 1,960,200 

FL ..... E2006–NWST–020 .......... Miami-Dade Transit County Metrorail Extension ........................................................ 9,801,000 

FL ..... E2006–NWST–017 .......... Central Florida Commuter Rail System ...................................................................... 10,781,100 

GA .... E2006–NWST–021 .......... Atlanta—Georgia 400 North Line Corridor Project ..................................................... 980,100 

IL ....... E2006–NWST–024 .......... CTA Yellow Line ......................................................................................................... 980,100 

IL ....... E2006–NWST–026 .......... Ogden Avenue Transit Corridor/Circle Line ................................................................ 980,100 

MA .... E2006–NWST–028 .......... North Shore Corridor Blue Line Extension ................................................................. 1,960,200

MA .... E2006–NWST–030 .......... Boston/Fitchburg Massachusetts Rail Corridor .......................................................... 1,960,200 

MA .... E2006–NWST–029 .......... Silver Line Phase III .................................................................................................... 3,920,400 

MD .... E2006–NWST–032 .......... Baltimore Red Line and Green Line ........................................................................... 1,960,200 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13953 

TABLE 15.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID Project Location and Description Unobligated allocation 

MD .... E2006–NWST–031 .......... Baltimore Central Light Rail Double Track Project ..................................................... 12,172,842 

MI ...... E2006–NWST–034 .......... Detroit Center City Loop ............................................................................................. 3,920,400 

MI ...... E2006–NWST–033 .......... Ann Arbor/Detroit Commuter Rail ............................................................................... 4,900,500 

MN .... E2006–NWST–035 .......... North Star Corridor Commuter Rail Project ................................................................ 1,960,200

MN .... E2006–NWST–036 .......... St. Paul Central Corridor, St. Paul/Minneapolis ......................................................... 1,960,200 

MO .... E2006–NWST–037 .......... Kansas City, Missouri—Southtown BRT .................................................................... 12,055,230 

NC .... E2006–NWST–039 .......... Triangle Transit Authority Regional Rail System (Raleigh-Durham) .......................... 19,602,000 

NJ ..... E2006–NWST–041 .......... Northern Branch Bergen County ................................................................................ 2,450,250 

NJ ..... E2006–NWST–042 .......... Northwest New Jersey-Northeast Pennsylvania Passenger Rail ............................... 9,801,000 

NJ ..... E2006–NWST–043 .......... Trans Hudson Midtown Corridor ................................................................................. 12,069,932 

NM .... E2006–NWST–044 .......... Commuter Rail, Albuquerque to Santa Fe ................................................................. 490,050 

NV ..... E2006–NWST–045 .......... Regional Fixed Guideway Project ............................................................................... 2,940,300 

NY ..... E2006–NWST–046 .......... Eastside Access Project ............................................................................................. 333,234,000 

OH .... E2006–NWST–048 .......... Cleveland-Euclid Corridor Transportation Project ...................................................... 24,281,500 

OR .... E2006–NWST–050 .......... Washington County Commuter Rail Project ............................................................... 14,701,500 

PA ..... E2006–NWST–051 .......... Corridor One Regional Rail Project ............................................................................ 1,470,150 

PA ..... E2006–NWST–053 .......... Schuylkill Valley Metro ................................................................................................ 3,920,400 

PR ..... E2006–NWST–054 .......... San Juan Tren Urbano ............................................................................................... 7,885,382 

RI ...... E2006–NWST–055 .......... Rhode Island Integrated Commuter Rail Project ........................................................ 5,880,600 

SC ..... E2006–NWST–056 .......... City of Rockhill Trolley Study ...................................................................................... 392,040 

TX ..... E2006–NWST–059 .......... Houston Metro ............................................................................................................. 5,880,600 

UT ..... E2006–NWST–061 .......... Mid-Jordan Light Rail Transit Line .............................................................................. 490,050 

VA ..... E2006–NWST–063 .......... Gainesville-Haymarket VRE Service Extension ......................................................... 1,421,145 

VA ..... E2006–NWST–062 .......... Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project, Virginia ........................................................... 29,403,000 

Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... $598,703,156 

Total Unobligated Allocations ............................................................................................................................................ $717,087,493 

TABLE 16.—FY 2007 SECTION 5310 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

APPORTIONMENTS

State Apportionment 

Alabama ......................................................................................................................................................................................... $2,035,366 

Alaska ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 276,085 

American Samoa ........................................................................................................................................................................... 63,219 

Arizona ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,126,988 

Arkansas ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,310,682 

California ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 12,394,851 

Colorado ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,481,207 

Connecticut .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,440,108 

Delaware ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 423,747 

District of Columbia ....................................................................................................................................................................... 366,156 

Florida ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7,908,221 

Georgia .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,969,256 

Guam ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 167,228 

Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 585,120 

Idaho .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 558,416 

Illinois ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4,581,777 

Indiana ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,413,518 

Iowa ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,246,465 

Kansas ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,117,777 

Kentucky ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,876,704 

Louisiana ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,868,467 

Maine ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 659,726 

Maryland ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,986,299 

Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2,636,140 

Michigan ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,812,077 

Minnesota ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,751,132 

Mississippi ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,314,415 

Missouri .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,305,142 

Montana ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 465,011 

N. Mariana Islands ......................................................................................................................................................................... 64,411 

Nebraska ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 742,834 

Nevada ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 907,190 

New Hampshire ............................................................................................................................................................................. 561,147 

New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,352,052 

New Mexico ................................................................................................................................................................................... 819,747 

New York ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7,942,602 

North Carolina ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3,320,537 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13954 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 16.—FY 2007 SECTION 5310 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

State Apportionment 

North Dakota .................................................................................................................................................................................. 368,361 

Ohio ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 4,457,215 

Oklahoma ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,544,612 

Oregon ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,432,073 

Pennsylvania .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5,260,761 

Puerto Rico .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,795,292 

Rhode Island .................................................................................................................................................................................. 567,897 

South Carolina ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,773,741 

South Dakota ................................................................................................................................................................................. 405,811 

Tennessee ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,470,273 

Texas ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 7,357,444 

Utah ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 737,346 

Vermont ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 347,005 

Virgin Islands ................................................................................................................................................................................. 158,769 

Virginia ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,605,065 

Washington .................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,216,199 

West Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................. 988,942 

Wisconsin ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,024,203 

Wyoming ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 296,725 

Total ........................................................................................................................................................................................ $116,659,554 

TABLE 17.—FY 2007 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED APPORTIONMENTS AND SECTION 5311(B)(3) 

RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP) APPORTIONMENTS

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report apportionments for Section 5311 and Section 5340 were combined 

to show a single amount. The State’s apportionment under the column heading ‘‘Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment’’ includes Section 

5311 and Growing States funds.] 

State 

Sections 5311 and 

5340 apportionment 

Section 5311(b)(3) 

apportionment 

Alabama ....................................................................................................................................................... $11,637,807 $176,277 

Alaska .......................................................................................................................................................... 5,320,819 80,509 

American Samoa ......................................................................................................................................... 199,704 12,544 

Arizona ......................................................................................................................................................... 8,323,026 119,285 

Arkansas ...................................................................................................................................................... 8,882,775 145,493 

California ...................................................................................................................................................... 19,998,674 236,053 

Colorado ...................................................................................................................................................... 7,315,810 113,327 

Connecticut .................................................................................................................................................. 2,377,249 89,737 

Delaware ...................................................................................................................................................... 1,108,746 76,216 

Florida .......................................................................................................................................................... 12,017,749 176,561 

Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................ 15,087,041 206,049 

Guam ........................................................................................................................................................... 539,792 16,874 

Hawaii .......................................................................................................................................................... 1,729,098 81,680 

Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................ 5,126,780 95,647 

Illinois ........................................................................................................................................................... 12,445,383 184,090 

Indiana ......................................................................................................................................................... 11,927,818 183,545 

Iowa ............................................................................................................................................................. 8,889,211 145,443 

Kansas ......................................................................................................................................................... 8,235,807 130,747 

Kentucky ...................................................................................................................................................... 11,260,036 174,906 

Louisiana ...................................................................................................................................................... 8,866,858 150,853 

Maine ........................................................................................................................................................... 4,775,042 107,673 

Maryland ...................................................................................................................................................... 4,376,645 109,363 

Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................. 3,058,310 96,705 

Michigan ....................................................................................................................................................... 15,184,764 214,199 

Minnesota .................................................................................................................................................... 11,178,461 163,037 

Mississippi .................................................................................................................................................... 10,115,947 161,128 

Missouri ........................................................................................................................................................ 12,150,008 176,218 

Montana ....................................................................................................................................................... 6,603,066 94,663 

N. Mariana Islands ....................................................................................................................................... 30,743 10,334 

Nebraska ...................................................................................................................................................... 5,755,218 105,239 

Nevada ......................................................................................................................................................... 4,319,300 79,297 

New Hampshire ........................................................................................................................................... 3,077,790 95,372 

New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................. 2,852,281 94,333 

New Mexico ................................................................................................................................................. 7,194,716 107,484 

New York ..................................................................................................................................................... 15,385,473 219,171 

North Carolina .............................................................................................................................................. 19,341,692 255,434 

North Dakota ................................................................................................................................................ 3,485,128 83,269 

Ohio ............................................................................................................................................................. 17,519,593 244,483 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13955 

TABLE 17.—FY 2007 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED APPORTIONMENTS AND SECTION 5311(B)(3) 

RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP) APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report apportionments for Section 5311 and Section 5340 were combined 

to show a single amount. The State’s apportionment under the column heading ‘‘Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment’’ includes Section 

5311 and Growing States funds.] 

State 

Sections 5311 and 

5340 apportionment 

Section 5311(b)(3) 

apportionment 

Oklahoma ..................................................................................................................................................... 9,914,012 152,348 

Oregon ......................................................................................................................................................... 8,581,134 129,179 

Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................................ 17,741,333 245,736 

Puerto Rico .................................................................................................................................................. 1,235,686 79,739 

Rhode Island ................................................................................................................................................ 510,592 70,338 

South Carolina ............................................................................................................................................. 9,718,038 159,949 

South Dakota ............................................................................................................................................... 4,310,749 89,879 

Tennessee ................................................................................................................................................... 12,388,999 185,988 

Texas ........................................................................................................................................................... 29,710,596 333,925 

Utah ............................................................................................................................................................. 4,232,444 86,541 

Vermont ....................................................................................................................................................... 2,311,127 87,357 

Virginia ......................................................................................................................................................... 10,912,491 170,030 

Washington .................................................................................................................................................. 8,392,208 135,620 

West Virginia ................................................................................................................................................ 5,902,440 122,430 

Wisconsin ..................................................................................................................................................... 11,806,200 176,956 

Wyoming ...................................................................................................................................................... 4,080,793 81,335 

Total ...................................................................................................................................................... $449,443,202 $7,320,588 

TABLE 18.—FY 2007 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID Project Allocation 1

Alabama ................. E2007–NATR–6701 ..................... Transportation Hybrid Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Research—

University of Alabama.

$487,000 

Alabama ................. E2007–NATR–6702 ..................... Transportation Infrastructure and Logistics Research—University of 

Alabama—Huntsville.

487,000 

Alabama ................. E2007–NATR–6703 ..................... Trauma Care System Research and Development—University of 

Alabama—Birmingham.

500,000 

California ................ E2007–NATR–6704 ..................... Regional Transit Training Consortium Pilot Program—Southern CA 

Regional Transit Training Consortium.

380,000 

California ................ E2007–NATR–7101 ..................... Center for Transit Oriented Development .......................................... 1,000,000 

Connecticut ............ E2007–NATR–6705 ..................... Advanced Technology Bus Rapid Transit Project—Southeastern CT 

Advanced Technology BRT Project.

540,000 

Connecticut ............ E2007–NATR–6706 ..................... Greater New Haven Transit District Fuel Cell-Powered Bus Research.525,960 

District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6501 ..................... Project ACTION .................................................................................. 3,000,000 

District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6707 ..................... Public Transportation National Security Study—National Academy 

of Sciences.

250,000 

Florida .................... E2007–NATR–6708 ..................... National Bus Rapid Transit Institute—University of South Florida ..... 1,750,000 

Kentucky ................ E2007–NATR–6709 ..................... Application of Information Technology to Transportation Logistics 

and Security—Northern Kentucky University.

400,000 

Maryland ................ E2007–NATR–6710 ..................... Transit Career Ladder Training Program ........................................... 1,000,000 

New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–6711 ..................... Center for Advanced Transportation Initiatives—Rutgers Center for 

Advanced Transportation Initiatives.

525,960 

New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–7102 ..................... Institute of Technology’s Transportation, Economic, and Land Use 

System—NJ TELUS.

540,000 

North Dakota ......... E2007–NATR–6712 ..................... Small Urban and Rural Transit Center—North Dakota State University.800,000 

Ohio ....................... E2007–NATR–6713 ..................... Intelligent Transportation System Pilot Project—Ohio State University.465,000 

Oregon ................... E2007–NATR–6714 ..................... Portland, Oregon Streetcar Prototype Purchase and Deployment—

TriMet.

1,000,000 

Pennsylvania ......... E2007–NATR–6715 ..................... Hydrogen Fuel Cell Shuttle Deployment Demonstration Project—Allentown, PA.800,000 

Pennsylvania ......... E2007–NATR–6716 ..................... Regional Public Safety Training Center—Lehigh-Carbon Community 

College.

500,000 

Pennsylvania ......... E2007–NATR–6717 ..................... Transit Security Training Facility—Chester County Community College.750,000 

Wisconsin .............. E2007–NATR–8501 ..................... Wisconsin Supplemental Transportation Rural Assistance Program—WI DOT.2,000,000 

................................ E2007–NATR–6502 ..................... Human Services Transportation Coordination .................................... 1,600,000 

................................ E2007–NATR–6503 ..................... National Technical Assistance Center for Senior Transportation 

(Section 5314(b)).

1,000,000 

................................ E2007–NATR–6718 ..................... Pilot Program for Remote Infrared Audible Signs .............................. 500,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13956 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 18.—FY 2007 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID Project Allocation 1

................................ E2007–NATR–7103 ..................... Public Transportation Participation Pilot Program .............................. 1,000,000 

................................ E2007–NATR–6801 ..................... Transportation Equity Research Program .......................................... 1,000,000 

Subtotal Allocation National Research and Technology Program ...................................................................................... $22,800,920 

District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6719 ..................... Transit Cooperative Research Program ............................................. 9,300,000 

District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6720 ..................... University Transportation Centers Program ....................................... 7,000,000 

New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–6721 ..................... National Transit Institute ..................................................................... 4,300,000 

Total Allocation National Research Programs .................................................................................................................... $43,400,920 

1Allocations include Small Business Innovative Research takedown when applicable. 

TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

200,000 or more in Population ...................................................................................................................................................... $86,400,000 

50,000–199,999 in Population ....................................................................................................................................................... 28,800,000 

Nonurbanized ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28,800,000 

National Total ......................................................................................................................................................................... 144,000,000 

Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 or more in Population: 

Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ............................................................................................................................... $559,566 

Akron, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................... 262,301 

Albany, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 243,289 

Albuquerque, NM .................................................................................................................................................................... 343,932 

Allentown—Bethlehem, PA—NJ ............................................................................................................................................ 228,109 

Anchorage, AK ....................................................................................................................................................................... 88,502 

Ann Arbor, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... 127,800 

Antioch, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 89,316 

Asheville, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... 120,215 

Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,415,682 

Atlantic City, NJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 102,367 

Augusta-Richmond County, GA—SC ..................................................................................................................................... 201,825 

Austin, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... 428,056 

Bakersfield, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 335,486 

Baltimore, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 918,141 

Barnstable Town, MA ............................................................................................................................................................. 79,179 

Baton Rouge, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 310,627 

Birmingham, AL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 375,374 

Boise City, ID .......................................................................................................................................................................... 102,516 

Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ................................................................................................................................................... 77,282 

Boston, MA—NH—RI ............................................................................................................................................................. 1,448,238 

Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY ............................................................................................................................................. 274,601 

Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. 510,836 

Canton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 119,001 

Cape Coral, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................... 155,494 

Charleston—North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................ 231,598 

Charlotte, NC—SC ................................................................................................................................................................. 292,995 

Chattanooga, TN—GA ........................................................................................................................................................... 178,019 

Chicago, IL—IN ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3,729,369 

Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ......................................................................................................................................................... 610,517 

Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 819,481 

Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................ 178,625 

Columbia, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... 202,042 

Columbus, GA—AL ................................................................................................................................................................ 157,239 

Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 514,252 

Concord, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 106,069 

Corpus Christi, TX .................................................................................................................................................................. 211,359 

Dallas—Fort Worth—Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................ 2,095,014 

Davenport, IA—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... 132,714 

Dayton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 319,945 

Daytona Beach—Port Orange, FL ......................................................................................................................................... 143,926 

Denton—Lewisville, TX .......................................................................................................................................................... 87,808 

Denver—Aurora, CO .............................................................................................................................................................. 736,267 

Des Moines, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 134,315 

Detroit, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,776,059 

Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 160,702 

El Paso, TX—NM ................................................................................................................................................................... 675,416 

Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................ 140,201 

Evansville, IN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................. 104,713 

Fayetteville, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... 160,308 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13957 

TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Flint, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................... 218,413 

Fort Collins, CO ...................................................................................................................................................................... 90,407 

Fort Wayne, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 126,707 

Fresno, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 505,727 

Grand Rapids, MI ................................................................................................................................................................... 218,475 

Greensboro, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... 121,991 

Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 163,180 

Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ............................................................................................................................................................... 123,033 

Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 124,755 

Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................ 331,675 

Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 312,074 

Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,346,350 

Huntsville, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 96,032 

Indianapolis, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 487,963 

Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ............................................................................................................................. 176,743 

Jackson, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 198,363 

Jacksonville, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 417,039 

Kansas City, MO—KS ............................................................................................................................................................ 548,699 

Knoxville, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... 221,837 

Lancaster, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 115,080 

Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ...................................................................................................................................................... 172,608 

Lansing, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. 158,895 

Las Vegas, NV ....................................................................................................................................................................... 644,125 

Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................ 131,848 

Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 99,023 

Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ 204,063 

Los Angeles—Long Beach—Santa Ana, CA ......................................................................................................................... 8,442,199 

Louisville, KY—IN ................................................................................................................................................................... 424,761 

Lubbock, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................... 150,887 

Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 141,454 

McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 703,574 

Memphis, TN—MS—AR ......................................................................................................................................................... 613,956 

Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2,950,084 

Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 618,079 

Minneapolis—St. Paul, MN .................................................................................................................................................... 752,458 

Mission Viejo, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... 116,753 

Mobile, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... 242,851 

Modesto, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 217,635 

Nashville-Davidson, TN .......................................................................................................................................................... 351,465 

New Haven, CT ...................................................................................................................................................................... 211,127 

New Orleans, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 787,518 

New York—Newark, NY—NJ—CT ......................................................................................................................................... 9,542,399 

Ogden—Layton, UT ................................................................................................................................................................ 148,268 

Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................. 448,031 

Omaha, NE—IA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 271,986 

Orlando, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 579,092 

Oxnard, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 196,151 

Palm Bay—Melbourne, FL ..................................................................................................................................................... 171,388 

Pensacola, FL—AL ................................................................................................................................................................. 187,713 

Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 125,072 

Philadelphia, PA—NJ—DE—MD ........................................................................................................................................... 2,295,088 

Phoenix—Mesa, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................ 1,515,115 

Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 795,971 

Port St. Lucie, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... 141,358 

Portland, OR—WA ................................................................................................................................................................. 687,146 

Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY .............................................................................................................................................. 145,723 

Providence, RI—MA ............................................................................................................................................................... 580,123 

Provo—Orem, UT ................................................................................................................................................................... 174,644 

Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 176,769 

Reading, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 114,391 

Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................ 142,722 

Richmond, VA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 342,650 

Riverside—San Bernardino, CA ............................................................................................................................................. 1,081,019 

Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 318,702 

Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ 117,454 

Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI .............................................................................................................. 48,662 

Sacramento, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 775,462 

Salem, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 215,814 

Salt Lake City, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. 341,093 

San Antonio, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... 907,380 

San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,476,858 

San Francisco—Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................ 1,318,167 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13958 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

San Jose, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 486,612 

San Juan, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,347,537 

Santa Rosa, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 110,882 

Sarasota—Bradenton, FL ....................................................................................................................................................... 236,321 

Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 141,828 

Scranton, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 203,254 

Seattle, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,013,784 

Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 210,674 

South Bend, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................... 128,602 

Spokane, WA—ID .................................................................................................................................................................. 188,373 

Springfield, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... 291,029 

Springfield, MO ....................................................................................................................................................................... 125,052 

St. Louis, MO—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... 899,591 

Stockton, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 277,437 

Syracuse, NY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 215,397 

Tallahassee, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 139,757 

Tampa—St. Petersburg, FL ................................................................................................................................................... 1,030,946 

Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................................................................................ 91,840 

Thousand Oaks, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... 49,642 

Toledo, OH—MI ...................................................................................................................................................................... 265,835 

Trenton, NJ ............................................................................................................................................................................. 104,396 

Tucson, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................. 465,291 

Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ 300,717 

Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ............................................................................................................................... 137,860 

Virginia Beach, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. 650,859 

Washington, DC—VA—MD .................................................................................................................................................... 1,256,532 

Wichita, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 191,748 

Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................ 139,386 

Worcester, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... 189,020 

Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................................................................................ 230,793 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 86,400,000 

Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population: 

Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. $805,905 

Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 36,316 

Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... 290,494 

Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. 518,014 

California ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3,000,086 

Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. 483,031 

Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. 294,526 

Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. 49,569 

Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,678,878 

Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... 919,739 

Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 54,443 

Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 311,710 

Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 662,248 

Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... 708,815 

Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 426,122 

Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... 194,919 

Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. 264,981 

Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ 836,620 

Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 254,427 

Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. 316,406 

Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 270,424 

Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 897,332 

Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... 243,496 

Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. 150,126 

Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. 300,193 

Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. 230,052 

N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. 83,476 

Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ 15,349 

Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... 39,745 

New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... 230,658 

New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. 147,701 

New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ 285,184 

New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ 541,073 

North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 919,021 

North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 174,497 

Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 675,417 

Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... 182,912 

Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... 233,689 

Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... 884,906 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13959 

TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2,710,414 

South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 516,851 

South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 130,637 

Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. 600,676 

Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,230,936 

Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 132,974 

Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. 68,962 

Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 614,054 

Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. 799,167 

West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... 547,326 

Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... 732,721 

Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 102,782 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28,800,000 

Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Nonurbanized Areas Less than 50,000 in Population: 

Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. $963,952 

Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 93,888 

American Samoa .................................................................................................................................................................... 86,625 

Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... 518,262 

Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. 726,832 

California ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,467,032 

Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. 272,602 

Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. 70,243 

Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. 64,011 

Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 832,051 

Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,141,655 

Guam ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 86,742 

Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 114,590 

Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 248,790 

Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 649,149 

Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... 580,869 

Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 414,410 

Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... 412,799 

Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,050,459 

Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ 899,286 

Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 277,815 

Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. 179,234 

Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 111,986 

Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 772,911 

Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... 494,688 

Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,041,935 

Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. 847,599 

Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. 250,847 

N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. 49,282 

Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ 257,380 

Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... 77,213 

New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... 120,326 

New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. 95,639 

New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ 485,438 

New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ 923,625 

North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,452,051 

North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 132,630 

Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 988,407 

Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... 782,108 

Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... 395,978 

Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,049,729 

Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. 373,348 

Rhode Island .......................................................................................................................................................................... 16,431 

South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 804,861 

South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 198,975 

Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. 938,280 

Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,297,782 

Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 141,546 

Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. 128,000 

Virgin Islands .......................................................................................................................................................................... 87,089 

Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 675,288 

Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. 486,768 

West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... 568,900 

Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... 491,171 

Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 110,493 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28,800,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13960 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 20.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID Project and description Unobligated 

allocation 

FY 2002 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: 

AR E2002–JARC–005 .............................. Central Arkansas Transit Authority .................................................................. $500,000 

CA E2002–JARC–008 .............................. Del Norte County, California ............................................................................ 73,400 

NY E2002–JARC–054 .............................. Columbia County, New York ............................................................................ 100,000 

VA E2002–JARC–082 .............................. Winchester, Virginia ......................................................................................... 1,000,000 

Subtotal FY 2002 Unobligated Allocations ........................................................................................................................... 1,673,400 

FY 2003 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: 

CA E2003–JARC–011 .............................. LA County UTRANS ......................................................................................... 495,335 

CO E2003–JARC–020 .............................. City of Colorado Springs, CO .......................................................................... 100,284 

NY E2003–JARC–065 .............................. Chemung County Transit ................................................................................. 74,300 

NY E2003–JARC–066 .............................. Columbia County .............................................................................................. 99,067 

OH E2003–JARC–078 .............................. STEP–UP Job Access Project Dayton ............................................................ 123,834 

Subtotal FY 2003 Unobligated Allocations ........................................................................................................................... 892,820 

FY 2004 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: 

AK E2004–JARC–000 .............................. Craig Transit Service JARC Program .............................................................. 49,563 

AL E2004–JARC–006 .............................. Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program [ADA] Rural Transportation Services.495,630 

CA E2004–JARC–013 .............................. City of Irwindale Senior Transportation Services ............................................. 64,432 

CA E2004–JARC–014 .............................. Guaranteed Ride Home, Santa Clarita ............................................................ 396,504 

FL E2004–JARC–024 .............................. Key West, Florida Job Access Reverse Commute .......................................... 495,630 

IA .. E2004–JARC–026 .............................. Iowa Statewide JARC ...................................................................................... 159,980 

KS E2004–JARC–031 .............................. ADA Mobility Planning ...................................................................................... 361,810 

MD E2004–JARC–040 .............................. VoxLinx Voice-Enabled Transit Trip Planner ................................................... 1,288,638 

NJ E2004–JARC–050 .............................. New Jersey Community Development Corporation Transportation Opportunity Center.297,378 

NY E2004–JARC–055 .............................. Broome County Transit JARC .......................................................................... 99,126 

NY E2004–JARC–061 .............................. Essex County Job Access Reverse Commute Project .................................... 99,126 

NY E2004–JARC–063 .............................. MTA Long Island Bus Job Access Reverse Commute Project ....................... 247,815 

NY E2004–JARC–065 .............................. North Country County Consortium ................................................................... 456,299 

NY E2004–JARC–070 .............................. Ulster County Area Transit Rural Feeder Service ........................................... 49,563 

NV E2004–JARC–053 .............................. Lake Tahoe Public Transit Services JARC Project ......................................... 99,126

SD E2004–JARC–083 .............................. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Public Bus System ............................................ 247,815 

TN E2004–JARC–087 .............................. Monroe County TN Job Access Reverse Commute Program ......................... 99,126 

TX E2004–JARC–090 .............................. Corpus Christi Welfare to Work Project ........................................................... 372,714 

TX E2004–JARC–094 .............................. San Antonio VIA Metropolitan Transit JARC Program .................................... 136,298 

TX E2004–JARC–096 .............................. Texas Colonias JARC Initiative ........................................................................ 2,379,023 

VA E2004–JARC–101 .............................. Virginia Beach Paratransit Services ................................................................. 198,252 

WI E2004–JARC–109 .............................. Wisconsin Statewide JARC .............................................................................. 2,577,275 

Subtotal FY 2004 Unobligated Allocations ........................................................................................................................... 10,671,123 

FY 2005 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: 

AK E2005–JARC–000 .............................. Craig Transit JARC, Alaska ............................................................................. 49,559 

AK E2005–JARC–001 .............................. Kenai Peninsula JARC, Alaska ........................................................................ 594,709 

AK E2005–JARC–003 .............................. Mobility Coalition, Alaska ................................................................................. 495,590 

AK E2005–JARC–004 .............................. North Star Borough Transit JARC, Alaska ...................................................... 74,338 

AK E2005–JARC–005 .............................. Seward Transit JARC, Alaska .......................................................................... 198,236 

AL E2005–JARC–007 .............................. ARC of Madison County, Alabama .................................................................. 79,734 

AL E2005–JARC–008 .............................. Easter Seals Central Alabama JARC .............................................................. 495,590 

AL E2005–JARC–009 .............................. Gees Bend Ferry, Alabama ............................................................................. 1,982,362 

CA E2005–JARC–013 .............................. Guaranteed Ride Program, California .............................................................. 136,687 

CA E2005–JARC–014 .............................. Job Access Transit, Hayward, California ......................................................... 211 

CO E2005–JARC–017 .............................. Colorado Transit Coalition JARC ..................................................................... 529,310 

DC E2005–JARC–097 .............................. Community Transportation JOBLINKS Demonstration .................................... 620,899 

DC E2005–JARC–020 .............................. Technical Assistance Support & Performance Reviews of the JARC Grants 

Program.

7,073 

DC E2005–JARC–021 .............................. Washington Metro Job Access Initiative .......................................................... 569,530 

GA E2005–JARC–025 .............................. Chatham JARC, Georgia ................................................................................. 1,982,362 

GA E2005–JARC–026 .............................. Dooly-Crisp Unified Transportation System, Georgia ...................................... 198,236 

IL .. E2005–JARC–028 .............................. Illinois Statewide JARC .................................................................................... 145,842 

IN .. E2005–JARC–031 .............................. IndyFlex, Indiana .............................................................................................. 1,238,976 

LA E2005–JARC–037 .............................. Louisiana Statewide JARC ............................................................................... 2,115,329 

ME E2005–JARC–041 .............................. Maine Statewide JARC Program ..................................................................... 442,389 

MI E2005–JARC–042 .............................. DCC Community Health & Safety Transport Project, Michigan ...................... 297,354 

MN E2005–JARC–047 .............................. Metropolitan Council Job Access, Minneapolis, Minnesota ............................. 991,182 

MO E2005–JARC–049 .............................. Metro St. Louis Downtown Shuttle Trolley, Missouri ....................................... a 941,622 

MO E2005–JARC–050 .............................. Missouri Statewide JARC ................................................................................. 385,000 

NJ E2005–JARC–053 .............................. New Jersey Statewide JARC ........................................................................... 5,203,702 

NY E2005–JARC–057 .............................. Broome County Transit, Binghamton, New York ............................................. 247,796 

NY E2005–JARC–058 .............................. Central New York Job Access Reverse Commute, New York ........................ 495,590 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13961 

TABLE 20.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID Project and description Unobligated 

allocation 

NV E2005–JARC–056 .............................. Statewide Small Urban and Rural Public/Specialized Transportation Services (JARC), Nevada.455,624 

OH E2005–JARC–066 .............................. Western Reserve Transit Job Access Program, Ohio ..................................... 79,734 

PA E2005–JARC–071 .............................. Philadelphia Unemployment Project (PUP), Pennsylvania .............................. 1,106,772 

TN E2005–JARC–077 .............................. Children’s Health Fund JARC, Tennessee ...................................................... 495,590 

TN E2005–JARC–080 .............................. Tennessee Statewide JARC ............................................................................ 3,784,745 

TX E2005–JARC–081 .............................. Abilene JARC, Texas ....................................................................................... 148,677 

TX E2005–JARC–082 .............................. El Paso JARC, Texas ...................................................................................... 495,590 

TX E2005–JARC–083 .............................. Island Transit JARC, Texas ............................................................................. 136,687 

WA E2005–JARC–089 .............................. North Central Puget Sound Vehicle Trip Reduction Incentives, Washington 991,182 

WA E2005–JARC–090 .............................. Okanogan County Senior Citizens JARC, Washington ................................... 65,142 

WA E2005–JARC–092 .............................. WorkFirst Transportation Initiative, Washington .............................................. 775,447 

WI E2005–JARC–094 .............................. Ways to Work, Wisconsin ................................................................................ 170,591 

WI E2005–JARC–095 .............................. Wisconsin Statewide JARC .............................................................................. 2,577,071 

WV E2005–JARC–096 .............................. West Virginia Statewide JARC ......................................................................... 114,653 

Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ........................................................................................................................... 31,916,713 

Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ 45,154,056 

a November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006, funds made available for the continuation and expansion 

of existing JARC bus service on five north county bus routes servicing the METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. Funds may 

be expended on JARC activities authorized under Section 3037 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. 

TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

UZAs 200,000 or more in Population ............................................................................................................................................ $48,600,000 

UZAs 50,000–199,999 in Population ............................................................................................................................................. 16,200,000 

Nonurbanized ................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,200,000 

National Total .................................................................................................................................................................. 81,000,000 

Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 or more in Population: 

Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian, PR .................................................................................................................................... $126,100 

Akron, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................... 162,675 

Albany, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 156,364 

Albuquerque, NM .................................................................................................................................................................... 182,730 

Allentown-Bethlehem, PA–NJ ................................................................................................................................................ 156,018 

Anchorage, AK ....................................................................................................................................................................... 52,136 

Ann Arbor, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... 61,401 

Antioch, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 60,601 

Asheville, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... 77,517 

Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 888,971 

Atlantic City, NJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 73,829 

Augusta-Richmond County, GA–SC ...................................................................................................................................... 108,159 

Austin, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... 198,836 

Bakersfield, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 131,079 

Baltimore, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 635,438 

Barnstable Town, MA ............................................................................................................................................................. 78,928 

Baton Rouge, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 140,317 

Birmingham, AL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 216,937 

Boise City, ID .......................................................................................................................................................................... 63,948 

Bonita Springs-Naples, FL ..................................................................................................................................................... 73,189 

Boston, MA–NH–RI ................................................................................................................................................................ 1,123,648 

Bridgeport-Stamford, CT–NY ................................................................................................................................................. 237,663 

Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. 302,048 

Canton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 74,387 

Cape Coral, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................... 117,307 

Charleston-North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................... 129,823 

Charlotte, NC–SC ................................................................................................................................................................... 193,086 

Chattanooga, TN–GA ............................................................................................................................................................. 114,462 

Chicago, IL–IN ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,281,657 

Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN ............................................................................................................................................................ 402,647 

Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 516,455 

Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................ 108,709 

Columbia, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... 115,920 

Columbus, GA–AL .................................................................................................................................................................. 79,731 

Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ 287,416 

Concord, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 121,779 

Corpus Christi, TX .................................................................................................................................................................. 92,875 

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ............................................................................................................................................. 1,133,868 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13962 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Davenport, IA–IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 73,714 

Dayton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 202,124 

Daytona Beach-Port Orange, FL ............................................................................................................................................ 96,642 

Denton-Lewisville, TX ............................................................................................................................................................. 52,171 

Denver-Aurora, CO ................................................................................................................................................................. 508,189 

Des Moines, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 92,618 

Detroit, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1,191,993 

Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 71,810 

El Paso, TX–NM ..................................................................................................................................................................... 202,578 

Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................ 63,190 

Evansville, IN–KY ................................................................................................................................................................... 68,566 

Fayetteville, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... 78,091 

Flint, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................... 121,282 

Fort Collins, CO ...................................................................................................................................................................... 43,094 

Fort Wayne, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 75,827 

Fresno, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 182,740 

Grand Rapids, MI ................................................................................................................................................................... 134,163 

Greensboro, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... 75,458 

Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 98,271 

Gulfport-Biloxi, MS .................................................................................................................................................................. 73,167 

Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 92,218 

Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................ 246,950 

Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 199,316 

Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,058,478 

Huntsville, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 55,983 

Indianapolis, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 344,829 

Indio-Cathedral City-Palm Springs, CA .................................................................................................................................. 89,378 

Jackson, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 88,265 

Jacksonville, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 273,094 

Kansas City, MO–KS .............................................................................................................................................................. 372,884 

Knoxville, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... 133,250 

Lancaster, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 84,704 

Lancaster-Palmdale, CA ......................................................................................................................................................... 75,358 

Lansing, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. 78,317 

Las Vegas, NV ....................................................................................................................................................................... 427,045 

Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................ 69,302 

Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 51,472 

Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ 116,028 

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA .............................................................................................................................. 3,618,995 

Louisville, KY–IN .................................................................................................................................................................... 270,486 

Lubbock, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................... 59,515 

Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 68,449 

McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 163,731 

Memphis, TN–MS–AR ............................................................................................................................................................ 306,107 

Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1,677,667 

Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ 354,185 

Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN ....................................................................................................................................................... 524,419 

Mission Viejo, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... 108,270 

Mobile, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... 116,538 

Modesto, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 105,141 

Nashville-Davidson, TN .......................................................................................................................................................... 216,456 

New Haven, CT ...................................................................................................................................................................... 150,505 

New Orleans, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... 346,048 

New York-Newark, NY–NJ–CT .............................................................................................................................................. 5,715,679 

Ogden-Layton, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. 92,104 

Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................. 235,978 

Omaha, NE–IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 151,226 

Orlando, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 351,306 

Oxnard, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 102,398 

Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ........................................................................................................................................................ 133,980 

Pensacola, FL–AL .................................................................................................................................................................. 104,064 

Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................ 69,322 

Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................................................................................................................................................ 1,501,297 

Phoenix-Mesa, AZ .................................................................................................................................................................. 817,306 

Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 497,805 

Port St. Lucie, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... 102,434 

Portland, OR–WA ................................................................................................................................................................... 422,056 

Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ................................................................................................................................................ 91,165 

Providence, RI–MA ................................................................................................................................................................. 381,175 

Provo-Orem, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................... 51,869 

Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ 109,008 

Reading, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 70,151 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13963 

TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................ 91,383 

Richmond, VA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 228,332 

Riverside-San Bernardino, CA ............................................................................................................................................... 451,996 

Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 192,186 

Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ 77,674 

Round Lake Beach-McHenry-Grayslake, IL–WI .................................................................................................................... 46,333 

Sacramento, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 423,003 

Salem, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 61,392 

Salt Lake City, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. 219,483 

San Antonio, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... 419,240 

San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 724,318 

San Francisco-Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................... 950,208 

San Jose, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 399,440 

San Juan, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... 907,212 

Santa Rosa, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 80,089 

Sarasota-Bradenton, FL ......................................................................................................................................................... 201,463 

Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 70,682 

Scranton, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 136,965 

Seattle, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 719,018 

Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 89,205 

South Bend, IN–MI ................................................................................................................................................................. 81,200 

Spokane, WA–ID .................................................................................................................................................................... 102,142 

Springfield, MA–CT ................................................................................................................................................................ 190,613 

Springfield, MO ....................................................................................................................................................................... 61,769 

St. Louis, MO–IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... 569,735 

Stockton, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 108,677 

Syracuse, NY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 114,968 

Tallahassee, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... 42,761 

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL ...................................................................................................................................................... 750,519 

Temecula-Murrieta, CA .......................................................................................................................................................... 59,215 

Thousand Oaks, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... 45,968 

Toledo, OH–MI ....................................................................................................................................................................... 153,366 

Trenton, NJ ............................................................................................................................................................................. 79,784 

Tucson, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................. 223,339 

Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ 169,347 

Victorville-Hesperia-Apple Valley, CA .................................................................................................................................... 63,305 

Virginia Beach, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. 374,754 

Washington, DC–VA–MD ....................................................................................................................................................... 921,237 

Wichita, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 118,285 

Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................ 83,765 

Worcester, MA–CT ................................................................................................................................................................. 134,039 

Youngstown, OH–PA .............................................................................................................................................................. 133,542 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 48,600,000 

Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population: 

Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. 427,039 

Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 19,990 

Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... 138,375 

Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. 285,216 

California ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,658,388 

Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. 275,030 

Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. 263,340 

Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. 32,717 

Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,243,752 

Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... 450,350 

Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 46,626 

Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 162,054 

Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 366,849 

Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... 416,387 

Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 242,588 

Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... 114,329 

Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. 156,206 

Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ 439,286 

Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 178,554 

Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. 283,609 

Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 192,974 

Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 600,838 

Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... 142,564 

Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. 69,215 

Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. 169,381 

Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. 117,871 

N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. 25,394 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13964 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7,069 

Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... 32,221 

New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... 221,356 

New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. 117,951 

New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ 126,052 

New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ 329,549 

North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 668,035 

North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 101,329 

Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 457,729 

Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... 78,177 

Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... 119,717 

Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... 538,542 

Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. 725,592 

South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 369,859 

South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 89,214 

Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. 377,480 

Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,424,599 

Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 50,707 

Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. 42,435 

Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 370,909 

Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. 513,614 

West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... 323,652 

Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... 530,634 

Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 64,656 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,200,000 

Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Nonurbanized Areas Less than 50,000 in Population: 

Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. 549,123 

Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 44,556 

American Samoa .................................................................................................................................................................... 7,815 

Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... 233,977 

Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. 395,881 

California ................................................................................................................................................................................. 681,111 

Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. 153,515 

Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. 73,375 

Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. 47,217 

Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 529,045 

Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... 625,568 

Guam ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 22,802 

Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 64,695 

Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 106,683 

Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 417,599 

Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... 457,793 

Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 271,824 

Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... 236,728 

Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. 574,365 

Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ 384,804 

Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 174,703 

Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. 154,259 

Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 97,120 

Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 548,108 

Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... 313,216 

Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. 466,476 

Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. 453,812 

Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. 104,314 

N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. 751 

Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ 136,742 

Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... 56,657 

New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... 118,285 

New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. 73,896 

New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ 178,338 

New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ 570,674 

North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 892,873 

North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 62,960 

Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 657,623 

Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... 399,258 

Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... 269,190 

Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... 661,768 

Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. 83,167 

Rhode Island .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17,292 

South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ 453,680 

South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 83,154 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13965 

TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued 

Urbanized area/state Apportionment 

Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. 584,492 

Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,111,556 

Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 64,976 

Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. 81,040 

Virgin Islands .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15,756 

Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 456,910 

Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. 272,757 

West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... 296,767 

Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... 354,454 

Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 54,500 

Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,200,000 

TABLE 22.—FY 2007 SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID 

SAFETEA–

LU Project 

No. 

Project location and description Allocation 

California ........... E2007–ALTA–001 .................. 5 San Gabriel Valley—Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor 

Study.

$1,250,000 

Illinois ................. E2007–ALTA–002 .................. 7 Metra BNSF Naperville to Aurora Corridor Study .................. 1,250,000 

Illinois ................. E2007–ALTA–003 .................. 13 Metra-West Line Extension, Elgin to Rockford Study ............ 1,000,000 

Maryland ............ E2007–ALTA–004 .................. 12 Baltimore Red Line/Green Line Transit Project Study ........... 1,500,000 

Minnesota .......... E2007–ALTA–005 .................. 1 Minnesota Red Rock Corridor/Rush Line/Central Corridors 

Studies.

2,000,000 

Mississippi ......... E2007–ALTA–006 .................. 14 Madison-Ridgeland Transportation Commission, Mississippi, 

Madison LRT Corridor Study.

350,000 

North Carolina ... E2007–ALTA–007 .................. 11 Piedmont Authority Regional Transportation East-West Corridor Study.1,000,000 

New Jersey ........ E2007–ALTA–008 .................. 2 Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor Study .................................. 1,500,000 

New Jersey ........ E2007–ALTA–009 .................. 6 Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex Counties, New Jersey Corridor 

Study.

1,250,000 

New Jersey ........ E2007–ALTA–010 .................. 18 New Jersey Transit Midtown Project Study ............................ 2,500,000 

New Mexico ....... E2007–ALTA–011 .................. 10 Middle Rio Grande Coalition of Governments, Albuquerque 

to Santa Fe Corridor Study.

500,000 

Oregon ............... E2007–ALTA–012 .................. 3 Lane County, Oregon Bus Rapid Transit Phase II Corridor 

Study.

500,000 

Oregon ............... E2007–ALTA–013 .................. 4 Portland Streetcar, Oregon Corridor Study ............................ 1,500,000 

South Carolina ... E2007–ALTA–014 .................. 15 South Carolina Department of Transportation Light Rail 

Study.

300,000 

Utah ................... E2007–ALTA–015 .................. 17 Sevierville County Transportation Board, Sevier County BRT 

Study.

500,000 

Utah ................... E2007–ALTA–016 .................. 16 Provo Orem BRT Study .......................................................... 500,000 

Washington ........ E2007–ALTA–017 .................. 9 Sound Transit I–90 Long-Range Plan Corridor Studies ......... 750,000 

Wisconsin .......... E2007–ALTA–018 .................. 8 Madison and Dane Counties, Wisconsin Transport 2020 

Corridor Study.

750,000 

Unallocated Amount ......................................................... 6,100,000 

Total Allocation ............................................................................................................................................................................. 25,000,000 

TABLE 23.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS

State Earmark ID Project location and description Unobligated 

allocation 

FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations 

California ......... E2006–ALTA–000 ........................ San Gabriel Valley-Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor Study ........ $1,237,500 

Illinois .............. E2006–ALTA–001 ........................ Metra BNSF Naperville to Aurora Corridor Study ............................... 1,237,500 

Maryland .......... E2006–ALTA–003 ........................ Baltimore Red Line/Green Line Transit Project Study ........................ 1,485,000 

Michigan .......... E2006–ALTA–005 ........................ Madison-Ridgeland Transportation Commission, Mississippi, Madison LRT Corridor Study.346,500 

Minnesota ........ E2006–ALTA–004 ........................ Minnesota Red Rock Corridor/Rush Line/Central Corridors Studies .. 1,980,000 

New Jersey ..... E2006–ALTA–007 ........................ Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor Study ............................................... 1,485,000 

New Jersey ..... E2006–ALTA–009 ........................ New Jersey Transit Midtown Project Study ........................................ 2,475,000 

New Jersey ..... E2006–ALTA–008 ........................ Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex Counties, New Jersey Corridor Study .. 1,237,500 

New Mexico ..... E2006–ALTA–010 ........................ Middle Rio Grande Coalition of Governments, Albuquerque to Santa 

Fe Corridor Study.

495,000 

South Carolina E2006–ALTA–013 ........................ South Carolina Department of Transportation Light Rail Study .......... 297,000 

Utah ................. E2006–ALTA–014 ........................ Sevierville County Transportation Board, Sevier County BRT Study 495,000 

Utah ................. E2006–ALTA–015 ........................ Provo Orem BRT Study ....................................................................... 495,000 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13966 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 

TABLE 23.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS—Continued 

State Earmark ID Project location and description Unobligated 

allocation 

......................... ....................................................... Unallocated Amount ............................................................................ 6,039,000 

Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ 19,305,000 

[FR Doc. 07–1290 Filed 3–15–07; 3:11pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910–57–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES