alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hayes v. Thompson

*Yerdict*— *on conflicting emdence.*

The verdict of a jury on conflicting evidence will not be reviewed.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury and from an order denying a new trial.

The action was brought by W. Irving Hayes against Schuyler 0. Thompson.

*Charles Mason,*for appellant.

*H. W. Bentley*and *George W. Smith,*for respondent.

Mullin, *P.*J.

The only point passed upon is fully given in the head-note.

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, 

INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) No. 3:08-cv-00483-JRS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

The Federal Election Commission moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 56. A memorandum in support of the motion, including a statement of 

material facts as to which there is no genuine dispute and a statement of genuine issues regarding 

plaintiff’s statement of material facts, is attached pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7 and 56. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ 

Audra Hale-Maddox, Attorney, ahale-maddox@fec.gov 

VA Bar No. 46929 

Phillip Christopher Hughey, Acting General Counsel, chughey@fec.gov 

David Kolker, Associate General Counsel, dkolker@fec.gov 

Harry Summers, Assistant General Counsel, hsummers@fec.gov 

Claire Rajan, Attorney, crajan@fec.gov 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Telephone: (202) 694-1650 / Fax: (202) 219-0260 

October 18, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS Document 135 Filed 10/18/10 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 18th day of October, 2010, I will electronically file the 

foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will then send a notification 

of such filing (NEF) to the following: 

Michael Boos, michael.boos@gte.net 

Attorney & Counselor at Law 

4101 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 313 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

James Bopp, Jr., jboppjr@aol.com 

Barry Alan Bostrom, bbostrom@bopplaw.com 

Kaylan Phillips, kphillips@bopplaw.com 

Richard Eugene Coleson, rcoleson@bopplaw.com 

Bopp, Coleson and Bostrom 

1 South 6th St. 

Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510 

John Richard Griffiths, john.griffiths@usdoj.gov 

United States Department of Justice 

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 

Post Office Box 883 

Washington, DC 20044 

Debra Jean Prillaman, debra.prillaman@usdoj.gov 

Office Of The U.S. Attorney 

600 East Main Street, Suite 1800 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ 

Audra Hale-Maddox 

VA Bar No. 46929 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Telephone: (202) 694-1650 

Fax: (202) 219-0260 

ahale-maddox@fec.gov 

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS Document 135 Filed 10/18/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 11.707 Examination requirements. ( a ) An applicant for an endorsement as first-class pilot, except as noted in paragraph (b) of this section, is required to pass the examination described in subpart I of this part.
( b ) An applicant for an extension of route, or an applicant holding a license or MMC endorsement as master or mate authorized to serve on vessels of more than 1,600 GRT seeking an endorsement as first-class pilot, is required to pass those portions of the examination described in subpart I of this part that concern the specific route for which endorsement is sought.
§ 75.332 Contract cost and price. ( a ) The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
( b ) The non-Federal entity must negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all cases where cost analysis is performed. To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of subcontracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work.
( c ) Costs or prices based on estimated costs for contracts under the Federal award are allowable only to the extent that costs incurred or cost estimates included in negotiated prices would be allowable for the non-Federal entity under subpart E of this part. The non-Federal entity may reference its own cost principles that comply with the Federal cost principles.
( d ) The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-138]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Institute of Museum and Library Services; Sunshine Act Meeting of 
the National Museum and Library Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the agenda of the forthcoming meeting 
of the National Museum and Library Services Board. This notice also 
describes the function of the Board. Notice of the meeting is required 
under the Sunshine in Government Act.

TIME AND DATE: Monday, January 29, 2007 from 1:45 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

AGENDA: Committee Meetings of the Tenth National Museum and Library 
Service Board Meetings:

1:45 p.m.-3 p.m. Meeting of the Committee on Partnerships & Government 
Affairs.
    I. Staff Reports.
    II. Other Business.
3:15 p.m.-4:30 p.m. Meeting of the Committee on Policy and Planning.
    I. Staff Reports.
    II. Other Business.

PLACE: The meetings will be held at the Hilton Cincinnati Netherland 
Plaza, 35 West Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio. Telephone: (513) 421-
9100.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, January 30, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

AGENDA: Tenth National Museum and Library Services Board Meeting:

I. Welcome
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Financial Update
IV. Legislative Update
V. Committee Reports
VI. Board Program: Library and Museum and 21st Century Skills
VII. Board Updates
VIII. Adjournment

PLACE: The meeting will be held in the Discovery Room at the Freedom 
Center, 50 East Freedom Way, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Lyons, Special Events and 
Board Liaison, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street, 
NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Museum and Library Services 
Board is established under the Museum and Library Services Act, 20 
U.S.C. 9101 et seq. The Board advises the Director of the Institute on 
general policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authorities 
related to Museum and Library Services.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact: Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street, NW., 
9th Fl., Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676; TDD (202) 
653-4699 at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: January 9, 2007.
Kate Fernstrom,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 07-138 Filed 1-11-07; 1:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-M
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran

On March 15, 1995, by Executive Order 12957, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of Iran. On May 6, 1995, the President issued Executive Order 12959 imposing more comprehensive sanctions to further respond to this threat, and on August 19, 1997, the President issued Executive Order 13059 consolidating and clarifying the previous orders. 

Because the actions and policies of the Government of Iran continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national emergency declared on March 15, 1995, must continue in effect beyond March 15, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran. Because the emergency declared by Executive Order 12957 constitutes an emergency separate from that declared on November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, this renewal is distinct from the emergency renewal of November 2006. 

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 07-1174

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### HENRY GOLDBERGER, PLAINTIFF, v. KALMAN POSNACK AND HARRY TURKISH, TRADING AS POSNACK & TURKISH, DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October 12, 1928

Decided March 28, 1929.

Before Gummeke, Chief Justice, and Justice Paekeb.

For the plaintiff, *William Reger.*

For the defendants, *Edward Griffin.*

*334Pee Ctjeiam.

The present case arises out of a rear end collision in the dark of a winter morning in the Greenville section of Jersey City. The Hudson County Boulevard at this point is in two sections, separated by an isle of safety. The plaintiff’s milk wagon, from which the morning deliveries were being made, was pulled in toward the easterly curb of the boulevard, facing in a general northerly direction. The disputed question of fact was whether the milk wagon was substantially parallel with the curb or was diagonally out across the roadway with the horse at the curb and the tail of the wagon in the road. The defendants’ truck, seven and one-half feet wide, came up the boulevard in a northerly direction, the truck driver did not see the wagon until too late to stop, and the result was a collision with the rear of the wagon which inflicted personal injury on the defendant who was on the street taking off milk bottles or something of the kind. The judge charged the jury with care and no complaint is made of the charge. The jury found for the defendant and the plaintiff alleges-as reasons that the verdict was contrary to the weight of ■evidence, contrary to law, and contrary to the charge of the ■court. It is not contrary to the charge nor is it contrary to-the law; the real question is whether it is contrary to the weight of evidence. Heading the testimony from the book, we are not in position to say that the jury was not fully entitled to find that the wagon was directed across the roadway, and that there was no light on it as claimed by the defendants’ driver. These highway cases are particularly for the disposition of a jury, and the testimony is open to-the conclusion both that the defendants’ driver was guilty of no lack of care and also that the plaintiff must be guilty of contributory negligence.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Warrior transition leader[electronic resource]: medical rehabilitation handbook.**
 
MOBI | PDF | EPUB
 
SuDoc:D 104.6/2:W 23
Item Number:0351-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:000861473
 
November 13, 2017
Residential Furnaces and Boilers

Screening Analysis

James E. McMahon

(JEMcMahonLBL.gov)

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards

for Residential Furnaces and Boilers

July 17, 2001

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02FF
Screening Analysis Objectives

• The screening analysis identifies technologies for

detailed evaluation

• The objective is to focus on technologies that are

reasonable to employ

• Screened out technologies are eliminated from the

standards setting process

1

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02FF
Screening Criteria

• Technological feasibility

• Practicability to manufacture, install, and service

• Impacts on product utility or availability

• Impacts on health or safety

Federal Register Vol. 61, No0 136, 36982®3 (July 15, 1996)

2

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02FF
epartment Invites Comments

• Are there specific technologies that should or

should not be considered fog residential furnaces

and boilers?

3

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02FF
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
ULTRADATA Corporation:


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-01492) of ULTRADATA Corporation of
our report dated February 12, 1998, with respect to the balance sheet of
ULTRADATA Corporation as of December 31, 1997, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 1997, and the related schedule, which report
appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of ULTRADATA
Corporation.


KPMG, LLP
Mountain View, California
March 29, 1999
---

---

# Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements on Form F-3
(Nos. 333-130048 and 333-137153) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-136957, 333-110696, 333-100971 and
333-11650) of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. of our report dated March 26, 2007, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
Included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.

|                 |                                 
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Tel Aviv, Israel | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|June 3, 2007     |                                 
|                 | Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer    
|                 | A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---
<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-08559, 333-35237 and 333-41137)  and on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-05517 and 333-41487) of InVision Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated February 16, 1998 appearing in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Selected Consolidated Financial Data"
contained in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders.  However, it should be
noted that Price Waterhouse LLP has not prepared or certified such "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data".


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP




San Jose, California

March __, 1998
§ 11.522 Service requirements for national endorsement as assistant engineer (limited) of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for endorsement as assistant engineer (limited) of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels is 3 years of service in the engineroom of vessels. Eighteen months of this service must have been as a qualified member of the engine department or equivalent position.
( b ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.327, 11.329, and 11.333 of this part.
#### Mary A. Lane, Respondent, *v.*C. Augustus Koenig, Appellant.

(Argued January 3, 1910;

decided January 11, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appel.late Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 25, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover damages caused through the maintenance of an alleged nuisance by the defendant.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal; that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous; that permission to appeal had not been obtained; that the record contained no substantial exceptions, and that the appeal was frivolous and taken only for purposes of delay.

*Oscar Tryon*for motion.

*Frank S. Coburn*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# SUMMARY:

                        U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to                         *David_Rostker@ omb.eop.gov*                         or fax to 202-395-7285. Copies of submission may be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*OMB Number:*                     OMB 0412-0565.                

*Form Number:*                     N/A.                

*Title:*                     Certification Agreement.                

*Type of submissions:*                     Reinstatement.                

*Purpose:*                     The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) needs to require applicants for assistance to certify that it does not and will not engage in financial transactions with, and does not and will not provide material support and resources to individuals or organizations that engage in terrorism. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that USAID does not directly provide support to such organizations or individuals, and to assure that recipients are aware of these requirements when it considers individuals or organizations are subrecipients.                

*Annual reporting burden:*

                                         *Respondents:*                     2,000.                

                                         *Total annual responses:*                     4,000.                

                                         *Total annual hours requested:*                     1,500.                

Dated: March 15, 2007.

Joanne Paskar, 

Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Administrative Services, Bureau for Management.

[FR Doc. 07-1399  Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
§ 93.100 Conditions on use of funds. ( a ) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative ageement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, set forth in appendix A to this part, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B to this part, if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
( d ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, set forth in appendix A to this part, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
( e ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B to this part, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
#### § 79.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
#### Matter of Shaper.

*Lunatic*— *when contract for necessaries hinds estate.*

Where, after a committee of a lunatic had been appointed, the lunatic continued to live in his own house with his family as usual, and a grocer who did not know of the appointment of the committee, sold the lunatic groceries for his family to the amount of $258.67, and it was shown that the groceries were necessary for the lunatic, and were used in his *family; held,*that the grocer should he paid therefor out of the lunatic’s estate.

Appeal by petitioners from an order at special term, denying motion to confirm the report of a referee.

The petition was made by Charles Shaper and another, to have paid out of the estate of George E. Wing, a lunatic, a claim for groceries furnished to said lunatic after a committee of his estate had been appointed.

*F. P. Bellamy,*for appellant.

*Abel Crook,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The only point passed upon in the opinion is fully set forth in the head-note.

*Order reversed.*