alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JAMES EDWARD COLEN, 

 Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 14-12948 

 Honorable Paul D. Borman 

v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford 

 

CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al., 

 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________/ 

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES [43] 

 On March 5, 2015, Colen filed a response to Defendants Alford, 

Corizon, Jindal, Prasad and Suclhir’s affirmative defenses to his amended 

complaint. [43]. However, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a 

response to an answer is “allowed” only “if the court orders one.” Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 7(a)(7). The Court did not order Colen to respond to Defendants’ 

affirmative defenses, so his response [43] is hereby STRICKEN.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

1

 Colen should be aware that Defendants’ inclusion of a defense under 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is not the same as making a motion to dismiss 

under that rule, and thus the Court’s striking of the instant response does 

not prevent Colen from making these same arguments against dismissal in 

the event Defendants were to actually move to dismiss his complaint under 

that Rule. 

2:14-cv-12948-PDB-EAS Doc # 44 Filed 03/10/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 448
Dated: March 10, 2015 s/Elizabeth A. Stafford 

Detroit, Michigan ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF 

System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 10, 2015. 

 s/Marlena Williams 

 MARLENA WILLIAMS 

 Case Manager 

2:14-cv-12948-PDB-EAS Doc # 44 Filed 03/10/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 449
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coaxial LLC (the registrant), for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



/s/    KIM D.
KELLYKim D. Kelly President and Chief Executive Officer Coaxial LLCAugust 6, 2003/s/    DINESH C.
JAINDinesh C. Jain Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Coaxial LLCAugust 6, 2003




The undersigned hereby certify
that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coaxial Financing Corp. (the registrant), for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.



/s/    KIM D.
KELLYKim D. Kelly President and Chief Executive Officer Coaxial Financing Corp.August 6, 2003/s/    DINESH C.
JAINDinesh C. Jain Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Coaxial Financing Corp.August 6, 2003




---

The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLC (the
registrant), for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



/s/    KIM D.
KELLYKim D. Kelly President and Chief Executive Officer Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLCAugust 6, 2003/s/    DINESH C.
JAINDinesh C. Jain Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Insight Communications of Central Ohio,
LLCAugust 6, 2003
#### § 108.635 Self-contained breathing apparatus.

Each locker or space containing self-contained breathing apparatus must be marked: “SELF CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS”.
§ 79.37 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ shall issue an initial decision based only on the record, which shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact shall include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the claims or statements identified in the complaint, or any portions thereof, violate § 79.3;
( 2 ) If the person is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments considering any mitigating or aggravating factors that he or she finds in the case, such as those described in § 79.31.
( c ) The ALJ shall promptly serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs (if permitted) has expired. The ALJ shall at the same time serve all parties with a statement describing the right of any defendant determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the authority head. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she shall notify the parties of the reason for the delay and shall set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision of the ALJ is timely appealed to the authority head, or a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision is timely filed, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the ALJ.
QO
Ww
“I

FILED: November 21, 2001

ES COURT OF APPEALS
FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1252 (1)
(CA-99-559)

VIRGINIA SOCIETY FOR HUMAN LI
INCORPORATED

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appellee/cross-appellant has filed a bill of costs.
Appellant/cross-appeilee has filed an untimely objection to the

bill of costs. This case was affirmed in part, vacated in part

and remanded by publishec opinion

September 17, 2001. Rule

39(a) (4) states that .f 4

is affirmed in part, reversed

in part, modified or

are taxed only as the Court
orders. It appears aprropriate in the circumstances of these

cross-appeals that each rcarty pear their own costs.


The Court grants appellant/cross-appellee leave to file

objection to bili of costs out of time and denies appellee/

cross-appellant’s bill of ccsts.

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

un

io

ct
Exhibit 32.02

IDT CORPORATION

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of IDT Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Stephen R. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 14, 2008

|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Stephen R. Brown   
|Stephen R. Brown       
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDT Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: D'Agostino, Kathleen  

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 9:51 AM

To: Rosenthal, Steven <rosenthal.steven@epa.gov>

Subject: Xm comparisons

Just to look at a few examples, the attached file compares 95% hourly Xm, 95%  and 99% 720 hour average

Xms,  and highest 720 hour averages for the USS lines.
#### Jane A. Weed and Fannie S. Weed, *Appellants, v.*Charles O. Root, *Respondent,*Impleaded, *etc*.

So much of judgment as declares rights of parties, reversed. Dismissal of complaint affirmed, with costs to defendant and with costs of this appeal. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Managers

DB Commodity Services LLC:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-163552) of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund of our reports dated February 28, 2011, with
respect to the statements of financial condition, including the schedules of investments, of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the above noted Registration Statement.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|New York, New York
|February 28, 2011
§ 75.427 Bonding costs. ( a ) Bonding costs arise when the HHS awarding agency requires assurance against financial loss to itself or others by reason of the act or default of the non-Federal entity. They arise also in instances where the non-Federal entity requires similar assurance, including: Bonds as bid, performance, payment, advance payment, infringement, and fidelity bonds for employees and officials.
( b ) Costs of bonding required pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Federal award are allowable.
( c ) Costs of bonding required by the non-Federal entity in the general conduct of its operations are allowable as an indirect cost to the extent that such bonding is in accordance with sound business practice and the rates and premiums are reasonable under the circumstances.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14598-14599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1518]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Ancillary Studies to 
Major Ongoing NIDDK and NHLBI Clinical Research Studies PAR-06-216.
    Date: April 9, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 14599]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: John F. Connaughton, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 916, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 
(301) 594-7797, [email protected].

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1518 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.140   Filed 03/31/15   Page 1 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.141   Filed 03/31/15   Page 2 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.142   Filed 03/31/15   Page 3 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.143   Filed 03/31/15   Page 4 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.144   Filed 03/31/15   Page 5 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.145   Filed 03/31/15   Page 6 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.146   Filed 03/31/15   Page 7 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.147   Filed 03/31/15   Page 8 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.148   Filed 03/31/15   Page 9 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.149   Filed 03/31/15   Page 10 of 11

Case 2:14-cv-13482-VAR-DRG   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.150   Filed 03/31/15   Page 11 of 11
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division 

_______________________________________

)

STOP HILLARY PAC and DAN BACKER, ) No. 1:15-cv-01208-GBL-IDD

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Plaintiffs Stop Hillary PAC and Dan Backer respectfully move for a preliminary 

injunction:

1. prohibiting the FEC from commencing, recommending, pursuing, or ordering any 

adverse administrative, civil, or criminal action against Stop Hillary PAC or Dan Backer based 

on Stop Hillary PAC’s name during the pendency of this lawsuit; and

2. prohibiting the FEC from enforcing 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(4), either facially, or as 

applied to non-connected political committees with names that clearly and unambiguously 

oppose a candidate. 

A memorandum of law, supporting declaration, and proposed order are attached. As the 

Defendant has not yet entered an appearance and there is no counsel of record with whom to 

meet and confer. 

Case 1:15-cv-01208-GBL-IDD Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 25
2

Dated this 6th day of October, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Michael T. Morley

Dan Backer, Esq. Michael T. Morley

Virginia State Bar # 78256 Virginia State Bar #65762

DB CAPITOL STRATEGIES PLLC COOLIDGE REAGAN FOUNDATION

203 South Union Street, Suite 300 1629 K Street, Suite 300

Alexandria, VA 22314 Washington, DC 20006

Phone: (202) 210-5431 Phone: (860) 778-3883

Fax: (202) 478-0750 Fax: (202) 331-3759

E-mail: DBacker@DBCapitolStrategies.com E-mail: michaelmorleyesq@hotmail.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Stop Hillary PAC Attorney for Plaintiff Dan Backer

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Dan Backer, hereby certify that on this 6th day of October, 2015, I did cause a true and 

complete copy of the foregoing Plaintiff Dan Backer’s Motion to Certify Constitutional 

Questions to En Banc Court of Appeals, supporting memorandum, proposed order, and notice of 

hearing to be transmitted via first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon:

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20463

Defendant

/s/ Dan Backer

Dan Backer

Virginia State Bar # 78256

Attorney for Plaintiff Stop Hillary 

PAC

Case 1:15-cv-01208-GBL-IDD Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 26
§ 106.115 Notification requirements. ( a ) Prior to operating in U.S. waters, a vessel owner, operator, or charterer that has been issued an Aquaculture Support Operations Waiver by DOT's Maritime Administration (MARAD) to conduct aquaculture support operations must notify the Coast Guard in writing of its status. The notification must include the following information: ( 1 ) The vessel(s) name(s);
( 2 ) The vessel's official and/or International Maritime Organization number;
( 3 ) The geographic location within the waters of the United States where the vessel(s) will conduct treatment operations;
( 4 ) The period of time during which the Aquaculture Support Operations Waiver for the vessel(s) is approved including: ( i ) The start date (MM/DD/YYYY); and
( ii ) The expiration date (MM/DD/YYYY); and
( 5 ) A copy of the MARAD-issued Aquaculture Support Operations Waiver.
( b ) Written notification must be made to the Commandant (CG-CVC), ATTN: Office of Commercial Vessel Compliance, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501, or by email to *CG-CVC-3@uscg.mil .*
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
  
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael D. Michie, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated:
      February 17, 2009
                /s/ Michael D.
      MichieMichael
      D. MichieChief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 109.431 Logbook. ( a ) The master or person in charge of a unit, that is required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook, shall maintain the logbook on Form CG-706. When the voyage is completed, the master or person in charge shall file the logbook with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) The master or person in charge of a unit that is not required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook, shall maintain, on board, an unofficial logbook for making the entries required by this subpart. This logbook must be retained on board until the unit's next reinspection or inspection for certification.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56828, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51208, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53227, Oct. 1, 1999]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Electronic Health 
Records Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 15th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.).

DATES: April 18, 2007, from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. (Eastern Daylight 
Time).

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing 
gaps in adoption among providers.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/ehr_instruct.html.

    Dated: March 22, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-1541 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 98.93 Complaints. ( a ) This section applies to any complaint (other than a complaint alleging violation of the nondiscrimination provisions) that a Lead Agency has failed to use its allotment in accordance with the terms of the Act, the implementing regulations, or the Plan. The Secretary is not required to consider a complaint unless it is submitted as required by this section. Complaints with respect to discrimination should be referred to the Office of Civil Rights of the Department.
( b ) Complaints with respect to the CCDF shall be submitted in writing to the Assistant Secretary for Children and Families. The complaint shall identify the provision of the Plan, the Act, or this part that was allegedly violated, specify the basis for alleging the violation(s), and include all relevant information known to the person submitting it.
( c ) The Department shall promptly furnish a copy of any complaint to the affected Lead Agency. Any comments received from the Lead Agency within 60 days (or such longer period as may be agreed upon between the Lead Agency and Department) shall be considered by the Department in responding to the complaint. The Department will conduct an investigation of complaints, where appropriate.
( d ) The Department will provide a written response to complaints within 180 days after receipt. If a final resolution cannot be provided at that time, the response will state the reasons why additional time is necessary.
( e ) Complaints that are not satisfactorily resolved through communication with the Lead Agency will be pursued through the process described in § 98.90.
[63 FR 39981, Sept. 24, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 67595, Sept. 30, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WENDY E. WAGNER, et al, 

Plaintiffs,

v. No. 11-cv-1841 (JEB)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiffs Wendy E. Wagner, Lawrence M.E. Brown, and Jan W. Miller hereby appeal to 

the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from the order of this 

court entered on the 2nd day of November, 2012 (ECF No. 41), granting defendant Federal 

Election Commission’s motion for summary judgment, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary 

judgment, and entering final judgment for defendant.

/s/ Alan B. Morrison

Alan B. Morrison

George Washington Law School

2000 H Street NW

Washington D.C. 20052

(202) 994 7120

(202) 994 5157 (fax)

abmorrison@law.gwu.edu.

/s/ Arthur B. Spitzer

Arthur B. Spitzer

American Civil Liberties Union 

 of the Nation’s Capital

4301 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 434

Washington, D.C. 20008

(202) 457 0800

(202) 452-1868 (fax)

artspitzer@aclu-nca.org

November 8, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01841-JEB Document 43 Filed 11/08/12 Page 1 of 1