alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A OF GOLDLEAF FINANCIALSOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006**

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to theundersigned’s best knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q/A for Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for theperiod ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”):

|   | (a)    | fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (b)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theIssuer. |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

          This Certificationis executed as of March 28, 2007.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

|   |   | /s/ J. Scott   Craighead  |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                           |
|   |   | J. Scott   Craighead      |
|   |   | Chief   Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Power Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger Tannery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Dated: April 29, 2008

/s/ Roger TanneryRoger TanneryChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

---
#### § 617.3 Standards.

Standards for determining whether an age distinction or age-related term is prohibited are set out in part 90 of this title 45. See also appendix I to this part.
#### § 287.95 May a Tribe operate both a NEW Program and a Tribal TANF program?

Yes. However, the Tribe must adhere to statutory and regulatory requirements of the individual programs.
---

---

# Exhibit 11

# Statement of Computation
of Earnings per Share (in thousands)

Following is the data relating to the
weighted average number of shares used in the computation of diluted earning (loss) per
share:

|                                                    | Year endedDecember 31,2007 | Year ended December 31,2006
|--------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ---------------------------
|
|
|Weighted  average  number  of  shares  used  in the |                            |                            
|computation of basic earning (loss) per share       |                            |                            
|                                                    |                            |                            
|Add:  Net  additional  shares from the  anticipated |                            |                            
|exercise of stock options                           |                            |                            
|                                                    |                            |                            
|Weighted  average  number  of  shares  used  in the |                            |                            
|computation of diluted earning per share            |                            |                            
|                                                    |                            |                            
|                                                    |                            |                            
|Options which were not included in the  computation |                            |                            
|of diluted  earning  (loss) per share due to anti   |                            |                            
|dilutive effect                                     |                            |                            
|                                                    |                            |                            



---

---
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 21.1



                SUBSIDIARIES OF JITNEY-JUNGLE STORES OF AMERICA, INC.

                                                                 PERCENTAGE 
                                                                 OF VOTING
                                                                 SECURITIES
                                   JURISDICTION OF               OWNED BY 
NAME                                INCORPORATION                REGISTRANT 
----                               --------------                ----------

Interstate Jitney-Jungle Stores, Inc.   Alabama                       100%

Southern Jitney Jungle Company          Mississippi                   100%

McCarty-Holman Co., Inc.                Mississippi                   100%

Jitney-Jungle Bakery, Inc.              Mississippi                   100%

Delta Acquisition Corporation           Alabama                       100%





<PAGE>


                SUBSIDIARIES OF JITNEY-JUNGLE STORES OF AMERICA, INC.

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF MCCARTY-HOLMAN CO., INC. 

                                                            JURISDICTION OF
NAME                                                         INCORPORATION 
----                                                        ---------------
Pump and Save, Inc.                                           Mississippi
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM MAR 25 206 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

FROM: Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway W* 

Assistant General Counsel ^ 

Compliance Advice 

Joshua Blume 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report - Oakland County Democratic Party (LRA # 946) 

The Office of General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR") on 

the Oakland County Democratic Party. We concur with the findings in the DFAR (Misstatement 

of Financial Activity; Recordkeeping for Employees; Disclosure of Occupation and Name of 

Employer; Recordkeeping for Receipts; and Use of the Campaign Depository). If you have any 

questions, please contact Joshua Blume, the attomey assigned to this audit.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  December 5, 2005                         /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Daniel B. O'Brien
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.3


	
						
	 	

	 
	 
	 





April 1, 2020


Dave Boennighausen 


Dear Dave:
Pursuant to your Employment Agreement dated as of September 21, 2017 with the Company, you are entitled to receive a base salary as determined by the Compensation Committee which is subject to increase as determined by the Committee, but which may not be decreased below the level set forth in the Employment Agreement (“Salary Protection”).  Given the current crisis surrounding Covid-19 and the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, you have agreed to temporarily waive the Salary Protection provisions in your Employment Agreement as is further reflected in the attached Unanimous Written Consent of the Compensation Committee.  By signing below, you are acknowledging you agree to this temporary waiver.


	
				
	 
	 
	Sincerely,
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ MELISSA M. HEIDMAN
	 

	 
	Name:
	Melissa M. Heidman
	 

	 
	Title:
	Executive Vice President and General Counsel
	 








	
				
	Acknowledged by:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ DAVE BOENNIGHAUSEN
	 
	 

	Name:
	Dave Boennighausen
	 
	 

	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,




As
Adopted Pursuant to




Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael L. Wynhoff,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      May 15, 2008
            /s/ Michael L.
      Wynhoff
              Michael L. Wynhoff
              Chief Executive Officer






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 108.557 Free-fall lifeboat launching and recovery arrangements. ( a ) The launching appliance for a free-fall lifeboat must be designed and installed so that the launching appliance and the lifeboat it serves operate as a system to protect the occupants from harmful acceleration forces and to effectively clear the unit.
( b ) The launching appliance must be designed and arranged so that in its ready to launch position, the distance from the lowest point on the lifeboat it serves to the water surface with the unit in its lightest seagoing condition does not exceed the lifeboat's certificated free-fall height.
( c ) The launching appliance must be arranged so as to preclude accidental release of the lifeboat in its unattended stowed position. If the means provided to secure the lifeboat cannot be released from inside the lifeboat, the means to secure the lifeboat must be arranged as to preclude boarding the lifeboat without first releasing it.
( d ) Each free-fall launching arrangement must be provided with a secondary means to launch the lifeboat by falls. Such means must comply with the requirements of §§ 108.550, 108.553, and 108.555. Notwithstanding § 108.550(e), the launching appliance must be capable of launching the lifeboat against unfavorable conditions of list of 5 degrees in any direction and it need not comply with the speed requirements of §§ 108.553 (g), (h), and (i).
If the secondary launching appliance is not dependent on gravity, stored mechanical power or other manual means, the launching arrangement must be connected both to the unit's main and emergency power supplies.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

Office of Inspector General 

A Review of Homeland Security 

Activities Along a Segment of the 

Michigan-Canadian Border 

(Unclassified Summary) 

OIG-07-68 August 2007 
Unclassified Summary 

We reviewed DHS’ efforts to secure the border between the cities of Detroit 

and Port Huron against threats targeted at, through, and between five specific 

ports of entry. 

Our objective was to identify the challenges facing DHS components charged 

with securing that segment of the border, and to determine what steps are 

being taken to meet those challenges. We also assessed DHS’ interactions 

with its international, federal, state, local, and private sector partners who also 

claim some jurisdictional responsibility for border security operations. 

We conducted site visits of all five ports of entry. We interviewed department 

officials from each of the relevant DHS components in the Washington, DC 

area, as well as in Detroit and Port Huron, Michigan. We also met with 

officials from several federal, state, and local agencies, as well as those in the 

private sector. In addition, we reviewed relevant intelligence reports, risk and 

threat assessments, management directives, standard operating procedures, 

and statistical data. 

We identified several concerns regarding the integration and dissemination of 

intelligence, the protection of critical infrastructure/key resources, local 

targeting capabilities, the extent of local performance measures, and the need 

for additional technological resources. 

We are recommending that DHS increase its local intelligence presence; better 

coordinate the funding of protective measures for critical infrastructure/key 

resources; introduce additional standard operating procedures at the ports of 

entry; and deploy additional technological resources along the border. DHS is 

already taking steps toward remedying some of these issues in response to 

concerns that were raised during the course of our review. 

Unclassified Summary

A Review of Homeland Security Activities Along a Segment of the Michigan-Canadian Border 

Page 2 
Additional Information and Copies 

To obtain additional copies of this report, call the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at 

(202) 254-4199, fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web site at 

www.dhs.gov/oig. 

OIG Hotline 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of criminal 

or noncriminal misconduct relative to department programs or operations: 

• Call our Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; 

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292; 

• Email us at DHSOIGHOTLINE@dhs.gov; or 

• Write to us at: 

DHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600, Attention: 

Office of Investigations - Hotline, 245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410, 

Washington, DC 20528, 

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### William Schaus, plaintiff and appellant, agt. The Manhattan Gas-light Company, defendant and respondent.

*General*Term,

*June,*1873.

Under a general or specific denial of any part of the complaint which the plaintiff is required to prove to maintain Ms action, the defendant, upon principle and authority, is at all times at liberty to prove anything tending to show that plaintiff's allegation is untrue.

*Before*Ebeedman, Cubtis *and*Van Yoest, *JJ.*

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment entered in favor of defendant upon the verdict of a jury and from the order denying plaintiff’s motion upon the judge’s minutes for a new trial.

F. R. Shebman & A. R. Rodgebs, *for appellant.*

Henby Hv Andeeson, *for respondent.*

*By the*Court, Freedman, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff from water which entered the plaintiff’s cellar, as claimed by plaintiff, through the negligence of the defendant in opening a ditch in front of plaintiff’s premises for laying gas mains in the street. On the trial evidence was admitted, against plaintiff’s objection and exception, which tended to show that the water which caused the injury did not coiné from the ditch, but from the sewer or the connection with the sewer, and that the injury was the result of a defective sewerage system in that vicinity. We think the evidence was properly received. Although under the requirements of section 149 of the Code new matter must be-pleaded, and consequently the *482defenses of payment, release, accord and satisfaction of arbitrament, and many other entire and partial defenses, which, while they do not deny the cause of action stated in the complaint, yet seek-to avoid or to bar it, and which were formerly available under the general issue; must now be set up in the answer before evidence in support thereof can be received *(McKyring*agt. *Bull,*16 *N. Y.,*297), yet under a general or specific denial of any part of the complaint, which the plaintiff is required to prove to maintain his action, the defendant, upon principle and authority, is' at all times at liberty td prove anything tending to show that plaintiff’s allegation is untrue ( *Wheeler*agt. *Billings,*38 *N. Y.,*263; *Greenfield*agt. *Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*47 *id.,*430).

The testimony' of the parties was conflicting, and therefore presented a proper case for the jury. Plaintiff conceded that by refraining from moving for the direction of *a*verdict subject to an assessment of damages *(Rowe*agt. *Stevens,*44 *How., 10; S. C.,*12 *Abb. N. S.,*389).

The case having been submitted to the jury under a charge, to which no valid objection lies, and plaintiff’s exceptions to the refusal of the court to charge otherwise, as requested, and to the rulings of the court upon the questions of evidence that arose during the trial, appearing to be clearly untenable, the judgment and order appealed from must be severally affirmed, with costs.

Curtis and Van Vorst, JJ., concurred.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL VANDERLAAN, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 CIVIL ACTION

v. NO. 02-72072

 HON. JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

WARREN H. HARDY, et al., 

 Defendant(s). 

__________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge 

Komives’ June 23, 2005 Report and Recommendation. Being fully advised in the 

premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including any Objections, the

Court finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion in the Report and 

Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate

Judge's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the above matter is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

John Corbett O’Meara

United States District Judge

Dated: August 23, 2005

 

Copies: Michael Vanderlaan, James T. Farrell

2:02-cv-72072-JCO-PJK Doc # 70 Filed 08/23/05 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 428
- 4032
- 4033
- 4034
- 4035
#### The City of New York, by the Public Service Commission for the First District, Appellant, *v.*Interborough Rapid Transit Company et al., Respondents.

*City of New York*v. *Interborough Rapid Transit Go.,*125 App. Div. 437, affirmed.

(Argued December 17, 1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 5. 1908, upon an order reversing an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to restrain the defendant Interborough Rapid Transit Company from delivering to its codefendant electric power through certain ducts built in the walls of the subway in the city of New York.

*George S. Coleman*and *Le Roy T. Harkness*for appellant.

*Edward E. Sprague*and *George W. Wickersham*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
§ 111.30-15 Nameplates. ( a ) Each device must have a nameplate showing the device's function.
( b ) Each nameplate for a circuit breaker must show the electrical load served and the setting of the circuit breaker.
§ 234.11 Assistance in the form of money payments. ( a ) Federal financial participation is available in money payments made under a State plan under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI of the Social Security Act to eligible families and individuals. Money payments are payments in cash, checks, or warrants immediately redeemable at par, made to the grantee or his legal representative with no restrictions imposed by the agency on the use of funds by the individual.
( b ) [Reserved]
[36 FR 22238, Nov. 23, 1971, as amended at 51 FR 9206, Mar. 18, 1986]
# Senate Floor Activity - Thursday, June 26, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Thursday, June 26)

H.R. 2388

S. 1799

 S.Amdt. 3443

S. 2076

 S.Amdt. 3442

S. 2363

S.Res. 490

S.Res. 491

S.Res. 492

S.Res. 493

S.Res. 494

## Executive Business (Thursday, June 26)

PN1066

PN1075

PN1088

PN1177

PN1397

 215

PN1703

PN1704

 216

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.