alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2009295EN.01010001.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 295/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 295/100

---

Tuesday 2 September 2008Europe for Citizens programme (2007-2013) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0371

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 September 2008 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1904/2006/EC establishing forthe period 2007 to 2013 the programme Europe for Citizens to promote active European citizenship (COM(2008)0059 — C6-0060/2008 — 2008/0029(COD))

2009/C 295 E/27

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0059),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 151 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0060/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0275/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Tuesday 2 September 2008P6_TC1-COD(2008)0029

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 2 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1904/2006/EC establishing for the period 2007 to 2013 the programme ‘Europe for Citizens’ to promote active European citizenship

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 1358/2008/EC.)

---
#### § 108.471 Water pump.

Each water pump in a foam extinguishing system must be outside each machinery space in which the system has outlets and must not receive power from any of those spaces.
#### § 109.107 Designation of master or person in charge.

The owner of a unit or his agent shall designate an individual to be the master or person in charge of the unit.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 18-1519 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY SEWARD, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion of this Court, and the dissenting opinion of Judge 

Lipez, issued together on July 28, 2020, are amended as follows: 

On page 16, line, 15, replace "n.3" with "n.14." 

On page 36, line 6, replace "note 3" with "note 14." 

On page 38, footnote 18, replace "note 5" with "note 16."
§ 122.730 Servicing of inflatable liferafts, inflatable buoyant apparatus, inflatable life jackets, and inflated rescue boats. ( a ) An inflatable liferaft or inflatable buoyant apparatus must be serviced at a facility specifically approved by the Commandant for the particular brand, and in accordance with servicing procedures meeting the requirements of part 160, subpart 160.151, of this chapter— ( 1 ) No later than the month and year on its servicing sticker affixed under 46 CFR 160.151-57(n), except that servicing may be delayed until the next scheduled inspection of the vessel, provided that the delay does not exceed 5 months; and
( 2 ) Whenever the container is damaged or the container straps or seals are broken.
( b ) Each inflatable lifejacket and hybrid inflatable lifejacket or work vest must be serviced: ( 1 ) Within 12 months of its initial packing; and
( 2 ) Within 12 months of each subsequent servicing, except that servicing may be delayed until the next scheduled inspection of the vessel, provided that the delay does not exceed 5 months.
( c ) Each inflatable life jacket must be serviced in accordance with the servicing procedure under § 160.176 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( d ) Each hybrid inflatable life jacket or work vest must be serviced in accordance with the servicing procedure under § 160.077 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( e ) Repair and maintenance of inflated rescue boats must be in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. All repairs must be made at a servicing facility approved by the Commandant, except for emergency repairs carried out on board the vessel.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51353, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2001-11118, 67 FR 58541, Sept. 17, 2002]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 5, 2017

No. 04-17-00730-CR

Terrence Jerome BYRD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR9362W

Honorable Olin B. Strauss, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On November 28, 2017, the clerk’s record in this appeal was filed. It reflects that on 

February 11, 2015, appellant was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for 

five years. The clerk’s record also reflects that on October 19, 2017, the trial court signed a 

Judgment Adjudicating Guilt and imposed a sentence of one year of confinement in state jail. 

The clerk’s record also contains a certification of defendant’s right to appeal that certifies this 

criminal case “is an adjudication of guilt following a deferred adjudication, and the defendant 

has a limited right of appeal.” We therefore REINSTATE appellate deadlines. We ORDER the 

court reporter responsible for filing the reporter’s record in this appeal to file the reporter’s 

record on or before January 4, 2018.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of December, 2017.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 618.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 618.205 through 618.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10773-10774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Research Data 
Management.
    Date: March 19, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive

[[Page 10774]]

Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review 
Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 
9529, Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 
496-5388, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f48565a4b57504d4f7f5156515b4c1151565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37405e52435f58454777595e59534419595e5f19505841">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 1, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1092 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1973 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require post offices to have 

running water and sanitation facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require post 

offices to have running water and sanitation facilities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post Office Moderniza5 tion Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WATER AND SANITATION REQUIREMENTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 39, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing new section: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1973 IH

1 ‘‘§ 417. Water and sanitation requirements 

2 ‘‘The Postal Service shall ensure that every post of3 fice has access to running water and to bathroom facilities 

4 connected to either a sewer system or a septic tank.’’. 

5 (b) NON-CONFORMING POST OFFICES.—Not later 

6 than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

7 the United States Postal Service shall begin upgrades to 

8 ensure compliance with the requirements of section 417 

9 of title 39, United States Code (as added by subsection 

10 (a)). 

11 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 for chapter 4 of title 39, United States Code, is amended 

13 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘417. Water and sanitation requirements.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. LACK OF FACILITIES NOT TO BE CONSIDERED. 

15 Section 404(d)(2)(B) of title 39, United States Code, 

16 is amended to read as follows: 

17 ‘‘(B) may not consider— 

18 ‘‘(i) compliance with any provision of the 

19 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 

20 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.); or 

21 ‘‘(ii) whether the requirements of section 

22 417 are met in connection with the post of23 fice.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of FBR Capital Markets Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J.
Hendrix, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies this Form 10-K and shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section, and may not be used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.



|                     |  |  |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /S/    RICHARD J.
HENDRIX                 
|                     |  |  |  | Richard J. Hendrix Chief Executive Officer
#### THEODORE BAKER, PLAINTIFF, v. SILVER ROSE DEVELOPING AND REALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND SAMUEL SILVERMAN, DEFENDANTS.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided May 8, 1929.

Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.

For the rule, *Leo E. Luff.*

*Contra, Armstrong & Mullen.*

Pee Cubjam.

The plaintiff obtained judgment for personal injuries and property damage against the defendants in the amount of $1,600. The case comes up on defendants’ rule to show cause.

The reasons as filed enumerate five points, namely, that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence; that the evidence did not prove negligence on the part of the defendants; that the evidence did prove the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence; that the verdict of the jury was excessive, and that the verdict was actuated by mistake, passion, prejudice and partiality.

Defendants’ counsel argues vigorously that the defendants were not in any way participants in plaintiff’s injuries, and that if the accident was caused by a car, it was a car of some persons other than the defendants. However, there is persuasive evidence that the damage was caused by the car driven by defendant Silverman and owned by his co-defendant.

Defendants’ counsel also contends that the verdict was the result of a religious prejudice against Mr. Silverman and was the result of mistake. There was not a word in the com*503píete record to sustain the contention of religious prejudice or prejudice of any character.. The argument is entirely without a vestige of support in the record.

We have examined the entire testimony in the light of the reasons as filed and of defendants’ brief, and find no cause for granting a new trial.

The rule, therefore, will be discharged, with costs.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1254

THERESA M. YOUNG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LLOYD AUSTIN , DOD Secretary , Defendant

- Appellee,

a nd MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Defendant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00880

- RDB )

Submitted : September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Theresa M. Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1254 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Theresa M. Young appeals the district court’s order s dismiss ing Young’s employment discrimination claims and denying Young’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Young’s informal brief fails to meaningfully c hallenge the district court’s rationale for dismissing her claims, Young has forfeited appellate review of the court’s disposition

. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”)

. To the extent Young challenges the district court’s refusal to appoint her counsel , we discern no abuse of discretion i n this ruling . And although Young generally complain ed in her Rule 59(e) motion that she was not properly served with court filings in the district court proceedings , the court correctly observed that Young failed to specify what documents she did not tim ely receive, and the record confirms that Young was informed of Defendant’s motion to dismiss. We therefore affirm the appealed

- from orders. Young v. Austin , No. 1:21

- cv - 00880

- RDB (D. Md. filed Oct. 14, 2021 & entered Oct. 15, 2021; March 8, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1254 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Conexant Systems, Inc.
    
    First American Title Insurance Company4000 MacArthur Boulevard
    
    5 First American WayNewport Beach, CA 92660
    
    Santa Ana, CA 92701Attn: Mark Peterson, Esq.
    
    Attn; Patty Beverly
   Very truly yours,
CITY VENTURES, LLCBy:
    /s/ R. Mark BucklandR. Mark BucklandPresident  cc:
    
    Manatt Phelps LLP  Attn: Steven L. Edwards, Esq. (via email)
Manatt Phelps LLP  Attn: Adam R. Sails, Esq. (via email)
Mr. Craig Atkins (via email)
Mr. Tony Pauker (via email) 
Mr. Scott Homan (via email)
Ms. April Palmer-Moore (via email)
 Kenneth M. Kaplan, Esq. (via email)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1959 

To direct the Department of Defense to utilize no-cost economic development 

conveyances as the preferred method of disposal of excess property generated through the base closure process, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Ms. PINGREE of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Department of Defense to utilize no-cost economic development conveyances as the preferred method 

of disposal of excess property generated through the base 

closure process, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Communities 

5 Redevelopment Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1959 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR NO-COST ECONOMIC DEVELOP2 MENT CONVEYANCES. 

3 (a) REPEAL OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.—Sub4 section (a) of section 3006 of the National Defense Au5 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107– 

6 107; 115 Stat. 1350), and the amendments made by that 

7 subsection, are hereby repealed. Effective as of the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act, the provisions of section 

9 2905 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act 

10 of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 

11 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) that were amended by section 

12 3006(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

13 Fiscal Year 2002, as such provisions were in effect on De14 cember 27, 2001, are hereby revived. 

15 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 60 days after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

17 shall prescribe regulations to implement the provisions of 

18 section 2905 of the Defense Base Closure and Realign19 ment Act of 1990 revived by subsection (a) to ensure that 

20 the military departments transfer surplus real and per21 sonal property at closed or realigned military installations 

22 without consideration to local redevelopment authorities 

23 for economic development purposes, and without the re24 quirement to value such property. 

25 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

26 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1959 IH

1 shall submit to Congress a report on the status of current 

2 and anticipated economic development conveyances, pro3 jected job creation, community reinvestment, and progress 

4 made as a result of the enactment of this section. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 


JAN 1 9 2011 


THE AOMINISTRATOR 

Mr. John P. Wagner 

Oftice of the General Counsel 

American Petroleum Institute 

1220 L Street, NW 

Wash ington, D.C. 20005-4070 

Dear Mr. Wagner: 

This is in response to the Request for Slay you submitt ed to my offi ce on 

December 22, 20l 0, on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute, Exterran, the Gas Processors 

Association and the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America. The leiter requested an 

administrative stay of two paragraphs in the National Emission Standards fo r Hazardo us Air 

Pollutants for Stationary Rec iprocating Internal Combusti on Engines, spec ifically paragraph 40 

CFR 6J.6625(b) and paragraph 40 CFR 63.6625(k). These provisions address the perfonnance 

specifications and operation and maintenance requirements for continuous parametric monitoring 

sySlems (ePMS). 

The U.S. Environmental Protectio n Agency grants a 90-day stay (see CAA sectio n 

307(d)(7)(B») oflhe provisions in 40 CFR 63.6625(b) and 40 CFR 63.6625(k). All olher 

requirements promulgated in the rule remain in e ffect. While we do not necessaril y agree with. 

the characterizations you make in your request and ge nerally believe these provisions to be 

reasonable and justified, we believe it is appropriate to provide the requested 90-day stay. We 

expect in the near future to publish an amendment to the rule clarifying the CPMS data 

va lidat ion requ irements and the procedures for conducting quarte rl y calibrations of the 

temperature measuremem devices. We estimate that approximately one percent of all stationary 

engines are currently subject [0 these CPMS operation and ma intenance requ irements. 

If you have any questi ons regarding the reconsideration process, please conlact 

Peler Tsiri golis al (919) 54 1-94 11. 

Sincerel y: 

Internet AdOress (URl) . nnpJ/'WWw.8Pa.goy 


RlCycledlRecycrebi. e Prirtlad WIth V&geIableOil Based Inks on l00"Y,. P05tconsumel. Prooess Chionne Free RecycleO Paper
Order entered August 17, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00361 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N .E., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 12 - 13599 - Z N o. 05 - 15 - 00363 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.G., M.G., M a .G., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 13 - 17435 - Z



### O RDER The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to remove these appeals from the July 31, 2015 submission docket and to set them for submission on September 2, 2015 , without oral argument, before the same panel consisting of Justice Francis, Justice Lang

- Miers, and Justice Whitehill

. /s/ MOLLY FRANCIS PRESIDING JUSTICE