alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report of Next 1 Interactive,
Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, William Kerby, Principal Executive Officer of Next 1 Interactive, Inc., certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Next 1 Interactive, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: June 13, 2013 |  | /s/ William Kerby           | 
|------------------- |  | --------------------------- | 
|                    |  | William Kerby               | 
|                    |  | Principal Executive Officer |
SUPREME COURT.

#### Francis Vose agt. The Florida Railroad Company *et al.*

*Special Term,*

*February,*1873.

Where the appellate court has sent a case back for the trial of a single remaining question, which belongs to the jury, the special term will order the cause put upon circuit calendar, notwithstanding objections that other issues are involved and unsettled.

Motion to strike cause from calendar, upon the ground that it belongs to the circuit.

William C. *Traphagen, for motion.*

Strong & Shepard, opposed.

Van Brunt, J.

This motion is based upon the ground that the only question remaining to be tried in this action is the liability of the defendant, Yulee, as indorser of certain promissory notes mentioned in the complaint, and that that issue should be tried by a jury.

The plaintiff, in opposition to the motion, claims that there still remains another issue to be disposed of besides the question of Tulee’s liability as indorser, viz., that of his right to be subrogated to all the rights of the Florida Railroad Company, or of Tulee, as indorser for said company, against the defendants Dickerson and associates, in all securities hypothecated by them, as indemnity for said notes or indorsements. The complaint has been dismissed as to all the defendants except Yulee, and, it seems to me, very clear that this question of subrogation cannot now be litigated in this action, because Edward K". Dickerson and associates are not now before the court, and they have the right to be heard upon that *425question, and it cannot be determined in their *absence;*and it is evident, from a reading of the opinion in the court of appeals, that in sending the case back as to the defendant Tulee, they had no idea that any question remained to be tried except the question of how much Tulee was liable for as indorser.

It would appear, therefore, that as the question of subrogation cannot possibly be now tried in the action, that it is a proper case for the circuit.
21st Century
Holding Company
  EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Braun, Chief
Executive Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 21st
      Century Holding Company.





By:/s/ Michael H.
      BraunMichael
      H. Braun, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer)
              May
      17, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

71 FR 71597, December 11, 2006.

# Status:

Open Meeting. 

# Place:

100 F Street, NE., Auditorium, LL-002, Washington, DC. 

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:

Wednesday, December 13, 2006. 

# Change in the Meeting:

Additional Item. 

The following matter will also be considered as part of Item 3 during the 10 a.m. Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 13, 2006: 

The Commission will consider whether to propose changes to its requirements for attestation reports. 

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: December 11, 2006. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-9722 Filed 12-12-06; 10:53 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 1 of 35    Pg ID 77

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 2 of 35    Pg ID 78

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 3 of 35    Pg ID 79

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 4 of 35    Pg ID 80

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 5 of 35    Pg ID 81

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 6 of 35    Pg ID 82

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 7 of 35    Pg ID 83

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 8 of 35    Pg ID 84

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 9 of 35    Pg ID 85

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 10 of 35    Pg ID 86

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 11 of 35    Pg ID 87

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 12 of 35    Pg ID 88

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 13 of 35    Pg ID 89

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 14 of 35    Pg ID 90

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 15 of 35    Pg ID 91

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 16 of 35    Pg ID 92

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 17 of 35    Pg ID 93

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 18 of 35    Pg ID 94

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 19 of 35    Pg ID 95

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 20 of 35    Pg ID 96

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 21 of 35    Pg ID 97

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 22 of 35    Pg ID 98

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 23 of 35    Pg ID 99

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 24 of 35    Pg ID 100

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 25 of 35    Pg ID 101

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 26 of 35    Pg ID 102

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 27 of 35    Pg ID 103

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 28 of 35    Pg ID 104

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 29 of 35    Pg ID 105

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 30 of 35    Pg ID 106

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 31 of 35    Pg ID 107

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 32 of 35    Pg ID 108

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 33 of 35    Pg ID 109

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 34 of 35    Pg ID 110

2:14-cv-12864-VAR-MKM   Doc # 13   Filed 01/08/15   Pg 35 of 35    Pg ID 111
Memorandum

FROM: Larry

Sorrels US EPA/OAQPS/HEI D/ABCG TO: Docket No. EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2008
- 0 708 SUBJECT: Data for Economic I mpact, Energy , and Small Entity Anal ys es for Final Stationary S I RI CE N ESHAP The spreadsheet “S IN ESHAP_RI A_final_economicenergy andsmallentity data.xls” contains all data used in the preparation of the economic impact, energy impact (for purposes of compliance with Executive Order 13211) , and small entity impact anal ys es (to comply with the RFA as modified by

SBREFA) included in the Regulatory I mpact Anal ys is (RIA) for the final St ationary Spark
- Ignition (S I) Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine (RICE) NESHAP. This data is taken from the Energy

I nformation Administration ’s Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) for 2010, the 2002 and 2007 Economic Census es , and the Power S ys tems Research (PSR) data used by US EPA/OAQPS/ SPPD in preparation of their cost analy ses for this final rule. The rule wi ll be promulgated on August 10 , 2010.
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

AUGUST 27, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).

1. Case No. SD32978

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v. KEITH A. PETERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Corey James Bravo v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00923

- CR

Trial court case number: 1788210

Trial court: Co unty Criminal C our t at Law No

. 2 of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on December 19, 2012. In the order of abatement, we ordered the trial court to execute an amended certification of appellant’s right to appeal, to determine whether appellant still wishes to appeal, to determine if appellant is indigent, and, if appellant is not indigent, to admonish appellant regarding self

- representation and either determine that appellant is knowingly and intelligently waiving his right to counsel or

set a deadlin e for appellant to hire counsel. On January 14, 2013, the trial court held a hearing on our order. The supplemental clerk’s record, filed January 15, 2013, contains a certification of the right to appeal indicating that appellant has the right to appeal. The reporter’s record of the hearing, filed January 16, 2013, shows that appellant wishes to pursue this appeal, that the trial court determined that appellant is not indigent, that appellant was admonished regarding self

representation, and that appella nt wishes to represent himself.

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 23, 2013
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

By signing below, each of the undersigned  officers hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge,  (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the  information  contained  in this  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Lincoln
Bancorp.

Signed this 14th day of May 2003.


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER:                   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER:


/s/ John M. Baer                           /s/ T. Tim Unger
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
John M. Baer                               T. Tim Unger
Secretary and Treasurer                    President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Lincoln  Bancorp  and will be  retained  by  Lincoln  Bancorp  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 10.4**

 

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO**

**CHANGE IN CONTROLSEVERANCE PAY AGREEMENT**

** **

This First Amendment toChange in Control Severance Pay Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and enteredinto as of August 16, 2009, by and between Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc.(“Company”), and Dan Owens (“Employee”).

 

**W I T N E S S E T H:**

** **

WHEREAS,Employee and Company previously entered into an Amended and Restated Change inControl Severance Pay Agreement dated May 13, 2009 (the “Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, Company iscontemplating a merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jack Henry &Associates, Inc. (“JKH”) and (the “JKH Merger”);

 

WHEREAS; the Board ofDirectors of Company has requested and Employee has agreed to a reduction incertain amounts payable to Employee in connection with the JKH Merger in orderto directly increase the merger consideration payable to shareholders of theCompany by an equivalent amount; and

 

WHEREAS, as a condition precedentto such increase, JKH has required the execution of this Amendment by Employee.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the mutual promises and agreements made herein, and other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.             Section 1.A of the Agreement is hereby amended byadding the following final sentence: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, in theevent of the closing of the JKH Merger, upon a termination of Employee’semployment by either party within 12 months of the Closing of the JKH Merger,in lieu of and in full satisfaction of the payments specified in this Section 1.A.of the Agreement, Employee hereby agrees to receive an amount equal to $211,600plus any earned but unpaid base salary, unpaid incentive compensation fromprior years, and accrued vacation.  Suchamount, if it becomes payable, shall be paid at the Closing of the JKH Mergerif notice of termination of employment is delivered by either JKH or Employeeat least two weeks prior to Closing, or therafter  upon the date of termination by either JKH orEmployee following not less than two weeks notice of termination.”

 

2.             Employee acknowledges that he is not entitled to anyunpaid incentive compensation from prior years.

 

3.             Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of theAgreement are unmodified and remain in full force and effect. The parties agreethat the reduction in amounts payable in connection with the JKH Merger shallnot operate as a waiver of Employee’s payment rights in connection with anyother transaction or event.

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theparties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

 
| Goldleaf  Financial Solutions, Inc. | /s/ Dan Owens   |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------|
|                                     | Dan  Owens      |
|                                     |            |
| By:                                      | /s/  Lynn Boggs |   |
|                                     |            |   |
| Title                                    | CEO             |   |

 

2

----
#### § 96.65 Discovery.

The use of interrogatories, depositions, and other forms of discovery shall not be allowed.
#### § 2553.83 What financial obligation does CNCS incur for non-CNCS funded projects?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545, Aug. 30, 2024.

Issuance of an NGA to a sponsor of a non-CNCS funded project does not create a financial obligation on the part of CNCS for any costs associated with the project.

[83 FR 64657, Dec. 17, 2018]
# CE2009286EN.01006001.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/60

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008Mergers of public limited liability companies (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0267

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 June 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (codified version) (COM(2008)0026 — C6-0045/2008 — 2008/0009(COD))

2009/C 286 E/19

(Codecision procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0026),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 44(2)(g) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0045/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0236/2008),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary of Defense

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 0900, Monday, April 16, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203, 703-741-0300.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects                           ( print page 14528)                        Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing an effective and economical research and development program in the area of electron devices.                

The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on benefits to national defense. These reviews may form the basis for research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities or in government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics, and electronic materials.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: March 20, 2007.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison  Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-1492  Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
No. 3055.

#### Joe Smith *v.*The State.

Fraudulent Disposition op Mortgaged Property.—Indictment, to be sufficient to charge the offense of disposing of mortgaged property with intent to defraud, must allege the name of the person to whom the mortgaged property was disposed of, or that the name of such person was unknown to the grand jury.

Appeal from the District Court of Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. E. D. McClellan.

*578Opinion delivered December 19, 1888.

The conviction was for the fraudulent disposition of mortgaged property, and the penalty assessed by the verdict was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

The sufficiency of the indictment is the one question determined on this appeal.

No brief on file for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for “disposing of and trading off” mortgaged property with intent to defraud. The indictment is fatally defective because it does not allege the name of the person to whom the property was disposed of, or traded, nor that the name of such person was unknown to the grand jurors. (Presley v. The State, *24*Texas Ct. App., 494.)

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution'is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed.*