alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subpart 113.25 of Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 113.25 of part 113 appear by CGD-94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996.

§ 113.25-8 Distribution of general emergency alarm system feeders and branch circuits. ( a ) Each system must have a feeder distribution panel to divide the system into the necessary number of zone, feeders, except where, because of the arrangement of the vessel, only one zone feeder is necessary; then a branch circuit distribution panel or feeder distribution panel must be used.
( b ) The feeder distribution panel must have overcurrent protection for each zone feeder, but there must be no disconnect switches.
( c ) The feeder distribution panel must be in an enclosed space next to the general alarm power supply.
( d ) Each system must have at least one feeder for each vertical fire zone that has general emergency alarm signal.
( e ) Each system must have one or more branch circuit distribution panels for each zone feeder, with at least one fused branch circuit for each deck level. The distribution panel must be above the uppermost continuous deck, in the zone served, and there must be no disconnect switches for the branch circuits.
( f ) A branch circuit must not supply emergency alarm signal on more than one deck level, except for a single branch circuit supplying all levels of a single space containing more than one deck level if all other requirements of this section are met.
( g ) On a vessel not divided into fire zones by main vertical fire bulkheads, the general emergency alarm system must be arranged into vertical service zones not more than 40 meters (131 feet) long, and there must be a general alarm feeder for each of these zones that has general emergency alarm signal.
( h ) General alarm feeders and branch circuit cables must be in passageways and must not be in staterooms, lockers, galleys, machinery spaces, or other enclosed spaces, unless it is necessary to supply general emergency alarm signal in those spaces.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15272, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996]
#### Bryson v. Sheridan.

Appeals by defendant, Bernard Sheridan, from orders at the special term denying motions to set aside judgments.

The judgments, two in number, were recovered, one by Thomas Bryson and another, and the other by Thomas Bryson against the defendant in actions to set aside a deed and mortgage.

*Edward M. Shepard,*for appellant.

*F. A. Ward,*for respondent.

Talcott, J.

The orders were affirmed on the ground that the judgments were entered upon the basis of an agreement between plaintiff’s and defendant’s attorneys, made in the presence of defendant, and that defendant had assented to the same. No point of any general importance was passed upon in the opinion.

*Order affirmed.*
§ 96.45 Preventive health and health services. ( a ) This section applies to direct funding of Indian tribes and tribal organizations under the preventive health and health services block grant.
( b ) For the purposes of determining eligible applicants under section 1902(d) of the Public Health Service Act, a grantee that received a grant directly from the Secretary in FY 1981 under any of the programs replaced by the preventive health and health services block grant that was specifically targeted toward serving a particular Indian tribe or tribal organization will be considered eligible if the grantee is an Indian tribe or tribal organization at the time it requests funds under this part. Grantees that received funds under formula or Statewide grants, and subgrantees that received funds from any program replaced by the preventive health and health services block grant, are not eligible.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0167

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ROBERT STUTZMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 8, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 30 2020

12/30/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0167
EX-31.1



Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification



I, Brian Bernard, the President of the Depositor, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-NC2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,

do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

<R>

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;

</R>

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

<R>

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Servicer and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Securities Administrator.





By:

/s/ Brian Bernard

Name:

Brian Bernard*

Title:

President

J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I

Date:

March 30, 2007

* Brian Bernard is the senior officer in charge of securitization of J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I

</R>
#### § 2510.10 What are the purposes of the programs and activities of the Corporation for National and Community Service?

The National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993 established the Corporation for National and Community Service (the Corporation). The Corporation's mission is to engage Americans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service. This service will address the Nations educational, public safety, human, and environmental needs to achieve direct and demonstrable results. In doing so, the Corporation will foster civic responsibility, strengthen the ties that bind us together as a people, and provide educational opportunity for those who make a substantial commitment to service. The Corporation will undertake activities and provide assistance to States and other eligible entities to support national and community service programs and to achieve other purposes consistent with its mission.

[59 FR 13783, Mar. 23, 1994]
# EUR-Lex - 52008AP0202 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52008AP0202

**The return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State (codified version) ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 20 May 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State (codified version) (COM(2007)0873 — C6-0025/2008 — 2007/0299(COD)) **

*
Official Journal C 279 E , 19/11/2009 P. 0120 - 0121 *

The return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0202

European Parliament legislative resolution of 20 May 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State (codified version) (COM(2007)0873 — C6-0025/2008 — 2007/0299(COD))

(2009/C 279 E/28)

(Codecision procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0873),

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0025/2008),

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts [1],

- having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0152/2008),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

--------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7562

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS BRANTLEY JENKINS, II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:15-cr-00053-CCE-3)

Submitted: April 12, 2021 Decided: April 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Bryson, WYATT EARLY HARRIS WHEELER, LLP, High Point, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Julie C. 

Domachowski, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Brantley Jenkins, II, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion 

for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First 

Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. We review the district court’s 

order for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, F.3d , , No. 20-7009, 2021 

WL 1216543, at *2 (4th Cir. Apr. 1, 2021) “A district court abuses its discretion when it 

acts arbitrarily or irrationally, fails to consider judicially recognized factors constraining 

its exercise of discretion, relies on erroneous factual or legal premises, or commits an error 

of law.” United States v. Dillard, 891 F.3d 151, 158 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation 

marks omitted).

The district court did not make an erroneous factual finding in stating that Jenkins 

had served less than half of his sentence, because this statement simply reflected the term 

imposed at sentencing without considering the good-time credits Jenkins had earned and 

was projected to earn. Moreover, while the district court did not expressly address Jenkins’ 

argument that he did not present a danger to the community if released, it offered a detailed 

explanation for why the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors did not support granting Jenkins’ 

motion and, thus, demonstrated that it “considered the parties’ arguments and ha[d] a 

reasoned basis for exercising [its] own legal decisionmaking authority.” Chavez-Meza v. 

United States, 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1964 (2018) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also 

Kibble, 2021 WL 1216543, at *4 (“[A] district court may not grant a sentence reduction 

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) without considering the factors set forth in section

3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable.” (internal quotation marks omitted)).
3

Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
   CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUPERIOR SERVICES, INC. AS
   OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
   ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
   </LEGEND>
   <RESTATED>
   <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
   <PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
   <CASH>                                          22,064
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   17,858
   <ALLOWANCES>                                     (746)
   <INVENTORY>                                        770
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,566
   <PP&E>                                         134,002
   <DEPRECIATION>                                (45,927)
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,930
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,907
   <BONDS>                                          1,662
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                          0
   <COMMON>                                           184
   <OTHER-SE>                                      95,981
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,930
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,085
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,240
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                   487
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 543
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,286
   <INCOME-TAX>                                     3,418
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,868
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                     4,868
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28<F1>
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28<F1>
   <FN>
   <F1>  EPS IS RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF FAS 128, "EARNINGS PER
   SHARE" AND TO REFLECT A TRANSACTION ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF
   INTERESTS IN JUNE, 1997.
   </FN>
           
   
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC,
the Managing Owner of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                        
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2008 |  | /s/ Kevin Rich                                         
|                     |  | Kevin Rich                                             
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

NATIONSBANK

January 26, 1998

               AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 31, 1996

     This document amends the Loan Agreement dated October 31, 1996 (the
"Agreement") made between NationsBank, N.A. ("Bank") and Powercerv Corporation
("Borrower"). The Agreement committed the Bank to offering the Borrower a
$5,000,000 Revolving Line of Credit.

     AMENDED TERMS

     2.B. REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT
     The Loan may be used for those purposes set forth in the original
documents. The obligation to repay the Loan will be evidenced by a promissory
note dated October 22, 1997 by and between Bank and Borrower. This Loan will be
unsecured and bear interest in accordance with the promissory note between Bank
and Borrower dated October 22, 1997. The entire balance of principal and accrued
interest will be due in full on February 15, 1999.  In addition, a $300,000
sublimit will apply under the 45,000,000 line of credit for the purpose of
supporting letters of credit.  Any outstanding letters of credit supported under
this sublimit will reduce the amount available to be drawn under the line of
credit.

     This amendment shall not imply amendment of any other conditions, now or
in the future, as outlined in any agreements or documents executed by and
between Bank and Borrower.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Agreement to be duly
executed under seal by their duly authorized representatives as of the date
first above written.

POWERCERV CORPORATION                   NATIONSBANK, N.A.



                     (seal)             /s/ Joseph L. Caballero
---------------------                   -------------------------
                                        Joseph L. Caballero
                                        Vice President


By: /s/
    -------------------------
Its: CHAIRMAN & CEO
     ------------------------

POWERCERV TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


                     (seal)
---------------------



By: /s/
    -------------------------
Its: SR. V.P. ADMINISTRATION
     ------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Widdicombe,
Chief Executive Officer of 21st Century Holding Company hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         21st Century Holding Company.


By:  /s/ Richard A. Widdicombe
----------------------------------------------
Richard A. Widdicombe, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          43,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                       568
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,448
<PP&E>                                         351,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                (78,725)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 749,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          599,945
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   749,570
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,425
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,639)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (28,318)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,091)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (14,767)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,259)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6

WELLS FARGO

REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT NOTE$5,000,000.00

West Covina, California
March 30, 2009


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Willdan Group, Inc. ("Borrower") promises to pay to the order of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank") at its office at San Gabriel Valley RCBO, 1000 Lakes Drive, Suite #250, West
Covina, CA 91790,or at such other place as the holder hereof may designate, in lawful money
of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, the principal sum of$5,000,000.00, or so much thereof as may be advanced and be
outstanding, with interest thereon, to be computed on each advance from the date of its disbursement as set forth herein.

1.     DEFINITIONS:



1

---





2.     INTEREST:



2

---





3.     BORROWING AND REPAYMENT:



4.     PREPAYMENT:



3

---





Borrower
acknowledges that prepayment of such amount may result in Bank incurring additional costs, expenses and/or liabilities, and that it is difficult to ascertain the full extent of such costs,
expenses and/or liabilities. Borrower, therefore, agrees to pay the above-described prepayment fee and agrees that said amount represents a reasonable estimate of the prepayment costs, expenses and/or
liabilities of Bank. If Borrower fails to pay any prepayment fee when due, the amount of such prepayment fee shall thereafter bear interest until paid at a rate per annum 2.000%above the Prime Rate in
effect from time to time (computed on the basis of a360-day
year, actual days elapsed).

5.     EVENTS OF DEFAULT:



6.     MISCELLANEOUS:



4

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Note as of the date first written above.

Willdan
Group, Inc.

|       |  |                                 |  | 
|------ |  | ------------------------------- |  | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Kimberly Gant Kimberly Gant |  | 
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer         |  | 

5

---



QuickLinks