alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted November 29, 1995,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration March 27, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Daniel M. Valencia, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION, *Petitioner, and*MILLS MINT FARM, INC., *Employer, v.*Daniel M. VALENCIA, *Respondent.*

(WCB No. 94-03439; CA A87028)

914 P2d 32

Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

*15Hollis Ransom argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Michael A. Gilbertson.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

DEITS, P. J.

*16DEITS, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant a penalty under ORS 656.268(4)(g), on the ground that claimant’s permanent partial disability (PPD) was increased on reconsideration by the Department of Consumer and Business Services. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

The pertinent statute here, ORS 656.268(4)(g), provides:

> “If, upon reconsideration of a claim closed by an insurer or self-insured employer, the department orders an increase by 25 percent or more of the amount of compensation to be paid to the worker for either a scheduled or unscheduled permanent disability and the worker is found upon reconsideration to be at least 20 percent permanently disabled, a penalty shall be assessed against the insurer or self-insured employer and paid to the worker in an amount equal to 25 percent of all compensation determined to be due the claimant.”

SAIF first argues that the Board erred in imposing a penalty under ORS 656.268(4)(g), because the increase in claimant’s PPD award was based on new information about his condition, not on any misconduct on its behalf, which it contends is a prerequisite to the imposition of a penalty. However, as we concluded in *SAIF v. St. Clair,*134 Or App 316, 320, 894 P2d 1264 (1995), under ORS 656.268(4)(g), a penalty shall be imposed regardless of whether employer engaged in misconduct if the two conditions specified in the statute are met.

SAIF also argues that the penalty was not proper, because one of the statutory conditions was not satisfied; namely, the total award of claimant’s disability was not at least 20 percent. Under our decision in *SAIF v. Cline,*135 Or App 155, 897 P2d 1172, *rev den*321 Or 560 (1995), SAIF is right. In that case, we held that under the language of ORS 656.268(4)(g), and the Board’s rule adopted to implement the statute, OAR 436-30-050(13), the requirement of “20 percent permanently disabled,” as a prerequisite to the imposition of a penalty, means 20 percent of the whole worker or 64 *17degrees. Claimant’s disability here is less than 64 degrees. Accordingly, the statutory prerequisite to imposing a penalty was not met, and the Board erred in doing so.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Bacou USA, Inc.:


The audits referred to in our report dated February 11, 2000, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1999, and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, included in the
annual report on Form 10-K. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-09251 and 333-72637) on Form S-8 of Bacou USA, Inc. of our reports,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bacou USA, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the related schedule, which
reports appear in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Bacou USA,
Inc.



Providence, Rhode Island                             KPMG LLP
March 17, 2000
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Varsity Group Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                         

|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 4, 2003 |  |                        
|                        |  | Eric J. Kuhn           
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer





---



##### 



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Varsity Group Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                         

|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 4, 2003 |  |                        
|                        |  | Jack M. Benson         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-56340, 333-41137, 333-35237, and 333-08559 of InVision Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-62821 of InVision Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated February 9, 2001 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InVision
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
March 28, 2001

---

QuickLinks
#### § 96.70 Scope.

This subpart applies to the social services block grant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1324 Filed 3-14-07; 2:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DlSTRJCT OF VlRGfNIA 

Alexandria Division 

) 

STOP RECKLESS ECONOMIC INST ABILITY ) 

CAUSED BY DEMOCRATS, el al., ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

ORDER 

Case No. I: 14-cv-397 (AJT/IDD) 

This matter is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Fourth Circuit with instructi ons to dismiss Counts l and II of the Complaint [Doc. No. 1] fo r 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Stop Reckless Econ. Ins/ability Caused by Democrats v. 

Fed. Election Comm 'n, 814 F.3d 221 (4th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Counts I and II of the Complaint [Doc. No. 1] be, and the same hereby 

are, DISMISSED fo r lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this 

renga 

United 'ta es District Judge 

Alexandria, Virginia 

May 18, 20 16 

Case 1:14-cv-00397-AJT-IDD Document 91 Filed 05/18/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 1207
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 11-cr-20129 

v. 

 Hon. Robert H. Cleland 

D-20 TONY WAYNE KITCHENS 

 Defendant. 

 

ORDER COMMITTING DEFENDANT TO THE CUSTODY OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

 

 On 1/5/2016, Defendant, along with his counsel and counsel for the government 

appeared (telephonically) for a competency hearing. All parties acknowledged 

receipt of a report and determination prepared by Glen D. King, J.D., Ph.D., 

ABPP, Certified Forensic Examiner. No objections to the finding that Defendant 

was not presently competent to stand trial were made. The Court thereby 

concluding that Defendant’s mental incompetence to stand trial had been 

established by a preponderance of the evidence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4241(d). 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4241(d), that Defendant 

be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization, for a 

2:11-cr-20129-RHC-MAR Doc # 1696 Filed 02/08/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 26181
period not to exceed four (4) months, to determine whether there is a substantial 

probability that Defendant will in the foreseeable future become competent to 

stand trial; 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant will remain on bond until such 

time as the Bureau of Prisons designates a facility for placement. Defendant will 

then be permitted to self-surrender to the designated facility. 

 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

 Robert H. Cleland 

 United States District Judge 

Entered: February 8, 2016 

2:11-cr-20129-RHC-MAR Doc # 1696 Filed 02/08/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 26182
EXHIBIT 10.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS








     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110696, 333-100971 and 333-11650)
of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. of our report dated March 22, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of B.O.S. Better Online
Solutions Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2003.









                                             /S/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

June 17, 2004                                KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
Tel Aviv, Israel                             A member of Ernst & Young Global
Former Industrial Property Cleaned Up and Restored

to Natural Estuarine Habitat

brownfieldsat-a-glance

SEQUIM BAY ESTUARY Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, Sequim Bay, WA

Cleanup Grant

EPA-560-F-08-299

September 2008

For additional data and geographic information for this 

and other Brownfields Grants, please visit EPA’s: 

Envirofacts - www.epa.gov/enviro/html/bms/bms_query.html

Enviromapper - www.epa.gov/enviro/bf

FOR MORE INFORMATION: Visit the EPA Brownfields Web site at http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/ or call EPA Region 10 at (206) 553-1200 

PROJECT BACKGROUND:

In Clallam County, Washington, the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe is part of a much larger project to restore estuary function 

to the south end of Sequim Bay, which had been degraded by 100 years of industrial and infrastructure development. 

The area of the Brownfields project was used to store timber logs in the estuary. The logs were brought to the site, 

rafted together into the water, and tied to creosote-treated pilings until they were towed off to area lumber mills. These 

creosote-treated pilings caused sediment pollution and habitat degradation by eliminating intertidal and subtidal area that 

formerly supported shellfish, eelgrass, and other natural estuarine habitat.

KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

• Removal of 99 creosote pilings from the estuary

• Removal of 350 tons of contaminated soil and 600 tons of solid waste on 

adjacent shoreline and riparian wetlands

• Restoration of 82-acre area to natural ecosystem functions

OUTCOME:

The restoration of the 82-acre area on tribal land was completed in August 

2005 and provides clean sediment and habitat for shellfish, salmon, and 

other natural species to repopulate the area. In the future, this increase in 

natural species will provide increased economic benefits for the Jamestown 

S’Klallam Tribe as finfish and shellfish are important food and revenue 

sources. It will also increase community economic tourist-related benefits 

through an expanded area for kayaking and bird watching. The tribe 

leveraged an additional $64,000 in state and federal funding to fund 

this cleanup.

ADDRESS: 56 Old Blyn Highway, Sequim, Washington 98382

PROPERTY SIZE: 82.31 acres

FORMER USES: Log storage and shipping for past 100 years 

CURRENT USES: Natural Estuary

EPA GRANT RECIPIENT: PROJECT PARTNERS:

The Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe 

received a $156,000 Brownfields Cleanup Grant for hazardous substances contamination.

More than 20 local, state, federal, and private 

entities are involved in the project, including: 

Clallam County, Washington Department 

of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Department 

of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service, and private land owners.

Removal of pilings during restoration.
FILED: October 1, 2008

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 08-1977

(3:08-cv-00483-JRS)

___________________

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, INC., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, 

 Defendants - Appellees

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

Upon consideration of submissions relative to the motion 

for injunction pending appeal and the motion to expedite, the 

Court denies the motions. 

Entered at the direction of Judge Gregory with the 

concurrences of Chief Judge Williams and Judge Duncan.

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
#### § 618.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 45 CFR part 611.
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: August 6, 2015

On Ju ly 27 , 2015, representatives of EPA attended a meeting with representatives of the

Business R oundtable and American Electric Power. Attendees discussed the ozone National

Ambient Air Quality Standards rulemaking. T he Business R oundtable and American Electric

Power provided meeting materials.

The following is a list of attendees and their affiliation.

Name Affiliation

Nick Akins Business Roundtable (BRT)

John Engler BRT

Tony Kavanagh American Electric Power

Marian Hopkins BRT

Randy Davis Stuntz, Davis & Staffler, P.C.

Gina McCarthy EPA Administrator (AO)

Micah Ragland EPA /AO

Brian Bond EPA /AO

Chris Cobbs EPA /AO

Jacklyn Mathew EPA /AO

Janet McCabe EPA/Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)

Joseph Goffman EPA/OAR
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-630.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MICRONESIA 

Signed at Washington September 24, 2002 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MICRONESIA 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Washington September 24, 2002; 

 Entered into force June 30, 2003.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1





                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
PowerCerv Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-3960) on Form S-8 of PowerCerv Corporation of our report dated January 30,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PowerCerv Corporation and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of PowerCerv Corporation.



/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

St. Petersburg, Florida
March 28, 1997
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended July 2, 2005(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/MICHAEL E. TENNENBAUM Michael E. Tennenbaum*Chairman of the Executive Committee*Dated: September 15, 2005     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                        |   |   |                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
| By:                 */s/                Edward J. Lawson*              |   |   |                                           |
| **Edward                J. Lawson, Chief Executive                Officer** |   |   | **May                10,                2007** |

----
§ 108.637 Hand portable fire extinguishers. ( a ) Each hand portable fire extinguisher must be marked with a number that identifies it in relation to all other hand portable fire extinguishers.
( b ) The location of each hand portable fire extinguisher must be marked with the same number that is marked on the extinguisher.
# C_2008198EN.01000101.xml

| 5.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/1

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities

(2008/C 198/01)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities (2) are amended as follows:

1

2

On page 397, the following text is inserted:

On page 397, the following text is inserted:

| ‘9506 62 10 and 9506 62 90 | Inflatable
  These subheadings also include inflatable gymnastic balls intended for general physical exercise.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘9506 62 10 and 9506 62 90

Inflatable

These subheadings also include inflatable gymnastic balls intended for general physical exercise.’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 360/2008 (OJ L 111, 23.4.2008, p. 9).

1

(2)  OJ C 133, 30.5.2008, p. 1.

2

---
#### § 108.627 Carbon dioxide and clean agent alarms.

Each carbon dioxide alarm must be identified by marking: “WHEN ALARM SOUNDS VACATE AT ONCE. CARBON DIOXIDE BEING RELEASED” next to the alarm.