alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-07-003]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  March 15, 2007 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-706 (Second Review) (Canned Pineapple Fruit from 
Thailand)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before March 29, 2007.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 8, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1193 Filed 3-9-07; 12:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1399]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 55 / Thursday, March 22, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 13468]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to David--Rostker@ 
omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285. Copies of submission may be 
obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0565.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Title: Certification Agreement.
    Type of submissions: Reinstatement.
    Purpose: The United States Agency for International Development 
(USAID) needs to require applicants for assistance to certify that it 
does not and will not engage in financial transactions with, and does 
not and will not provide material support and resources to individuals 
or organizations that engage in terrorism. The purpose of this 
requirement is to assure that USAID does not directly provide support 
to such organizations or individuals, and to assure that recipients are 
aware of these requirements when it considers individuals or 
organizations are subrecipients.
    Annual reporting burden:
     Respondents: 2,000.
     Total annual responses: 4,000.
     Total annual hours requested: 1,500.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Joanne Paskar,
Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Administrative 
Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 07-1399 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
EXHIBIT  32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of Network Installation Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the  "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge, that:

The quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the  Company  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.





/s/  Jeffrey  R.  Hultman
--------------------------------------
Jeffrey  R.  Hultman
Chief  Executive  Officer
Dated:  May  24,  2005







/s/  Michael  V.  Rosenthal
--------------------------------------
Michael  V.  Rosenthal
Chief  Financial  Officer
Dated:  May  24,  2005









The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.
Editorial Note on Part 99
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 99 appear at 63 FR 39998, July 24, 1998.

§ 99.14 Issues at hearing. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary may, prior to a hearing under § 98.91 of this part, notify the Lead Agency in writing of additional issues which will be considered at the hearing. Such notice shall be published in the Federal Register. If such notice is received by the Lead Agency less than 20 days before the date of the hearing, a postponement of the hearing shall be granted at the request of the Lead Agency or any other party. The hearing shall be held on a date 20 days after such notice was received, or on such later date as agreed to by the Assistant Secretary.
( b ) If, as a result of negotiations between the Department and the Lead Agency, the submittal of a Plan amendment, a change in the Lead Agency program, or other action by the Lead Agency, any issue is resolved in whole or in part, but new or modified issues are presented, as specified by the Assistant Secretary, the hearing shall proceed on such new or modified issues. A notice of such new or modified issues shall be published in the Federal Register. If such notice is received by the Lead Agency less than 20 days before the date of the hearing, a postponement of the hearing shall be granted at the request of the Lead Agency or any other party. The hearing shall be held on a date 20 days after such notice was received, or on such later date as agreed to by the Assistant Secretary.
( c ) ( 1 ) If, at any time, the Assistant Secretary finds that the Lead Agency has come into compliance with Federal statutes and regulations on any issue, in whole or in part, the Assistant Secretary shall remove such issue from the proceedings, in whole or in part, as may be appropriate. If all issues are removed, the Assistant Secretary shall terminate the hearing.
( 2 ) Prior to the removal of any issue from the hearing, in whole or in part, the Assistant Secretary shall provide all parties other than the Department and the Lead Agency (see § 99.15(b)) with written notice of the intention, and the reasons for it. Such notice shall include a copy of the proposed CCDF Plan provision on which the Lead Agency and Assistant Secretary have settled. The parties shall have 15 days from the receipt of such notice to file their views or any information on the merits of the proposed Plan provision and the merits of the Assistant Secretary's reasons for removing the issue from the hearing.
( d ) The issues considered at the hearing shall be limited to those issues of which the Lead Agency is notified, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, and new or modified issues described in paragraph (b) of this section; they shall not include issues or parts of issues removed from the proceedings pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
#### § 162.1011 Valid code sets.

Each code set is valid within the dates specified by the organization responsible for maintaining that code set.
§ 98.66 Disallowance procedures. ( a ) Any expenditures not made in accordance with the Act, the implementing regulations, or the approved Plan, will be subject to disallowance.
( b ) If the Department, as the result of an audit or a review, finds that expenditures should be disallowed, the Department will notify the Lead Agency of this decision in writing.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the Lead Agency agrees with the finding that amounts were not expended in accordance with the Act, these regulations, or the Plan, the Lead Agency shall fulfill the provisions of the disallowance notice and repay any amounts improperly expended; or
( 2 ) The Lead Agency may appeal the finding: ( i ) By requesting reconsideration from the Assistant Secretary, pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section; or
( ii ) By following the procedure in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) A Lead Agency may appeal the disallowance decision to the Departmental Appeals Board in accordance with 45 CFR part 16.
( e ) The Lead Agency may appeal a disallowance of costs that the Department has determined to be unallowable under an award. A grantee may not appeal the determination of award amounts or disposition of unobligated balances.
( f ) The Lead Agency's request for reconsideration in (c)(2)(i) of this section shall be postmarked no later than 30 days after the receipt of the disallowance notice. A Lead Agency may request an extension within the 30-day time frame. The request for reconsideration, pursuant to (c)(2)(i) of this section, need not follow any prescribed form, but it shall contain: ( 1 ) The amount of the disallowance;
( 2 ) The Lead Agency's reasons for believing that the disallowance was improper; and
( 3 ) A copy of the disallowance decision issued pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( g ) ( 1 ) Upon receipt of a request for reconsideration, pursuant to (c)(2)(i) of this section, the Assistant Secretary or the Assistant Secretary's designee will inform the Lead Agency that the request is under review.
( 2 ) The Assistant Secretary or the designee will review any material submitted by the Lead Agency and any other necessary materials.
( 3 ) If the reconsideration decision is adverse to the Lead Agency's position, the response will include a notification of the Lead Agency's right to appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board, pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section.
( h ) If a Lead Agency refuses to repay amounts after a final decision has been made, the amounts will be offset against future payments to the Lead Agency.
( i ) The appeals process in this section is not applicable if the disallowance is part of a compliance review, pursuant to § 98.90, the findings of which have been appealed by the Lead Agency.
( j ) Disallowances under the CCDF program are subject to interest regulations at 45 CFR part 30. Interest will begin to accrue from the date of notification.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1865 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1865

   To eliminate the requirement that States collect Social Security 
           numbers from applicants for recreational licenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

 Mr. Rehberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To eliminate the requirement that States collect Social Security 
           numbers from applicants for recreational licenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT THAT STATES COLLECT SOCIAL 
              SECURITY NUMBERS FROM APPLICANTS FOR RECREATIONAL 
              LICENSES.

    Section 466(a)(13)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
666(a)(13)(A)) is amended by striking ``recreational license,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Payne v. Burnham, appellant.

*Estoppel—usury.*

Before a mortgage given *by*defendant to a third party was assigned to plaintiff, defendant made affidavit that it was a valid, subsisting mortgage, believing which, plaintiff took the same for value. *Held,*that defendant was es-topped from setting up the defense of usury.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the decision of the court. The action was brought by Cornelius B. Payne against Amelia E. Burnham and others to foreclose a mort-

*Geo. G. Blcmke,*for'appellants.

*Geo. H. Grannis,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J,

The principal question in the case was one of fact which the referee decided upon conflicting evidence. The only point of law is fully stated in the head-note.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 800.106 Cost-sharing limits, advance payments of premium tax credits, and cost-sharing reductions. ( a ) *Cost-sharing limits.* For each MSP option it offers, an MSP issuer must ensure that the cost-sharing provisions of the MSP option comply with section 1302(c) of the Affordable Care Act, as well as any applicable standards set by OPM or HHS.
( b ) *Advance payments of premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.* For each MSP option it offers, an MSP issuer must ensure that an eligible individual receives the benefit of advance payments of premium tax credits under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code and the cost-sharing reductions under section 1402 of the Affordable Care Act. An MSP issuer must also comply with any applicable standards set by OPM or HHS.
§ 75.391 Collection of amounts due. ( a ) Any funds paid to the non-Federal entity in excess of the amount to which the non-Federal entity is finally determined to be entitled under the terms of the Federal award constitute a debt to the Federal Government. If not paid within 90 calendar days after demand, the HHS awarding agency may reduce the debt by: ( 1 ) Making an administrative offset against other requests for reimbursements;
( 2 ) Withholding advance payments otherwise due to the non-Federal entity; or
( 3 ) Other action permitted by Federal statute.
( b ) Except where otherwise provided by statutes or regulations, the HHS awarding agency will charge interest on an overdue debt in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900 through 999). The date from which interest is computed is not extended by litigation or the filing of any form of appeal. (See also HHS Claims Collection regulations at 45 CFR part 30.)
##### 



Exhibit No. 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of barnesandnoble.com inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Marie J. Toulantis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Marie J. Toulantis       
|    | 
|    |  | Marie J. Toulantis           
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
|    |  | barnesandnoble.com inc.      
|    |  | November 14, 2003            

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Mr, Pendergrass,

I am responding to the e-mail below from Graham Long and I would like to clarify our request.

The parts Boeing is asking to sell, will be new production parts, and not surplus from the DOD 

inventory. We understand that the sale of surplus parts is allowed under the current rule.

As to our intensions should the FAA grant a temporary exemption, given a demand for the parts, Boeing 

would pursue obtaining a production approval to allow the sale of parts once the exemption expires.

Please feel free to contact me should you have any further questions or requests.

Steven Dooley

Rotorcraft Certification Engineer

Vertical Lift Division

Boeing Military Aircraft

(610) 591-2019

Steven.P.Dooley@boeing.com

From: Graham.Long@faa.gov [mailto:Graham.Long@faa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 9:55 AM

To: Dooley, Steven P

Cc: Pong.K.Lee@faa.gov; daniel.j.elgas@faa.gov

Subject: FW: Boeing Cargo helicopter Sustainment Faa-2016-0833

Steve:

FAA Rulemaking is working on your petition. Apparently they are unclear on Boeing’s intentions and 

need some clarification, especially relating to producing new parts for sale vs. sale of military surplus 

parts. Can you send something to Mr. Pendergrass that would help clarify this? Perhaps a more-direct 

statement of your intentions? I think this is contained in the middle of your summary paragraph, but for 

someone reading this without the background information, they can be confused when the discussion 

switches from surplus parts to newly manufactured parts.

Mr. Pendergrass will be preparing the Federal Register Notice for the exemption. His contact 

information is below.

Best regards, Graham

Graham Long

AIR-111 Restricted Category Certification

Aircraft Certification Service

Federal Aviation Administration

202-267-1624
---

---

Exhibit 23.2

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference into the Registration Statements on Form F-3 and related prospectus of B.O.S
Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOS) (Nos. 333-130048 and 333-152020) and into
the Registration Statements of BOS on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-148318, 333-136957, 333-110696,
333-100971 and 333-11650) of our report dated March 29, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of BOS - Supply Chain Solutions (Lynk) Inc.
(formally known as Lynk USA Inc.) included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2008.

| |  | /s/ ARIK ESHEL, CPA & ASSOC., PC
ARIK ESHEL, CPA & ASSOC., PC
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 29, 2009



---

---
#### § 11.950 Examination subjects for engineer officer endorsements.

Table 1 to [§ 11.950](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-11.950) gives the codes used in Table 2 to [§ 11.950](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-11.950) for engineer officer endorsements. Table 2 to [§ 11.950](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-11.950) indicates the examination subjects for each endorsement by the code number.

Table 1 to [§ 11.950](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-11.950)—Codes for Engineer Officer Endorsements

| 1. First assistant engineer (unlimited). |
| 2. Third assistant engineer (unlimited). |
| 3. Chief engineer (limited). |
| 4. Assistant engineer (limited). |
| 5. Designated duty engineer (unlimited). |
| 6. Designated duty engineer (4,000 HP). |
| 7. Designated duty engineer (1,000 HP). |
| 8. Chief engineer (uninspected fishing industry vessels). |
| 9. Assistant engineer (uninspected fishing industry vessels). |
| 10. Chief engineer (MODU). |
| 11. Assistant engineer (MODU). |
| 12. Chief engineer (OSV unlimited). |
| 13. Assistant engineer (OSV unlimited). |
| 14. Chief engineer (OSV 4,000 HP). |
| 15. Assistant engineer (OSV 4,000 HP). |

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.014/ER24DE13.014_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.014/ER24DE13.014_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.015/ER24DE13.015_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.015/ER24DE13.015_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.016/ER24DE13.016_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.016/ER24DE13.016_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.017/ER24DE13.017_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.017/ER24DE13.017_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.018/ER24DE13.018_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.018/ER24DE13.018_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.019/ER24DE13.019_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.019/ER24DE13.019_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.020/ER24DE13.020_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.020/ER24DE13.020_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.021/ER24DE13.021_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.021/ER24DE13.021_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.022/ER24DE13.022_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.022/ER24DE13.022_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.023/ER24DE13.023_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.023/ER24DE13.023_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.024/ER24DE13.024_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.024/ER24DE13.024_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.025/ER24DE13.025_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER24DE13.025/ER24DE13.025_original_size.png)
U.S. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAR 0 2 2017 

Mr. Kreg Doerr 

Director, Aircraft Certi ftcation 

Row 44/Giobal Eagle Entertainment 

1050 Oak Creek Drive 

Lombard, IL 60148 

Dear Mr. Doerr: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

The FAA has received your petition, dated February 1 7, 2017, requesting an extension to the 

time limit for exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) 25.571(e)(l). Exemption no. 11071 allows installation of satellite-antenna 

radomes on Boeing Model 777-200 series airplanes that do not meet FAA bird-strikedamage tolerance requirements. 

Your petition has been uploaded to docket no. FAA-2014-0402 in regulations.gov. We are 

in the process of reviewing your extension request, and will contact you if we need 

additional information. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register for public conunent because the requested extension to the 

exemption would not set a precedent, no public comments were received on the original 

petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Row 44 fleet 

operations. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Ian Won at 425-227-2145, or e-mail ian.y.won@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Forseth 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service 

Federal Aviation Administration