alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose                           ( print page 14595)                        confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel, National Eye Institute Clinical Trials.                    

*Date:*                         April 9, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Tenleytown Meeting Room, Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Samuel Rawlings, PhD, Chief Scientific Review Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Eye Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, 301-451-2020,                         *rawlings@nei.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 21, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1519 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 73b.3 Reports of violations. ( a ) If an officer or employee of the Department has reason to believe that a former officer or employee of the Department has violated any provision of 18 U.S.C. 207 (a), (b) or (c) or if any such officer or employee receives information to that effect, he/she shall promptly make a written report thereof which shall be forwarded to the Inspector General. If any other person has information of such violations, he/she may make a report thereof to the Inspector General or to any officer or employee of the Department.
( b ) The Inspector General shall coordinate proceedings under this part with the Department of Justice in cases where it appears criminal prosecution is warranted.
#### Emmons v. Wheeler.

*Canal boat*— *is a vessel. Objection—to validity of law.*

Canal boats are vessels within the *“*act to provide for the collection of demands against ships and vessels.” (Laws 1862, chap. 482.) *Crawford*v. *Collins,*45 Barb. 269, followed.

The objection that a statute was unconstitutional, *held,*not available upon a motion for a new trial upon exceptions ordered to "be first heard at general term, "such objection not having been taken at the trial.

*618Motion by plaintiff for a new trial upon a case and exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at the general term after a nonsuit at the circuit.

The action was brought by Isaiah Emmons and another, against Sylvester A. Wheeler, and others, upon a bond given by the defendants on the release from a warrant of attachment of a canal boat, under the provisions of chapter 483 of the Laws of 1863, providing for the collection of demands against ships and vessels. The plaintiff was nonsuited at the circuit, upon the ground that a canal boat is not a vessel within the meaning of the statute.

*Cook &*Fitzgerald, for appellants.

*E. Thayer,*for respondents.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The circuit judge erred, we think, in directing a nonsuit, on the ground that the canal boat in question was not a ship or vessel, within the meaning of the act of April 25, *1862*(Laws 1862, chap. 482), providing for the collection of demands against ships and vessels. The statute speaks of two classes of vessels, one is described *“ as sea-going or ocean-bound vessels,”*and the other *“as any other vessel.”*Canal boats are clearly embraced, we think, within this latter class, and we concur with the decision of *Crawford*v. *Collins,*45 Barb. 269, which is a general term decision of this court, in the fourth district, decided in 1866, and expressly adjudicates this point. The attention of the learned judge was not called to this case at the circuit.

But, it is urged on the part of the respondent, that the act of 1863 is unconstitutional, and we are referred to the cases of *Bird*v. *Steamboat Josephine,*39 N. Y. 19, and *Vose*v. *Cockroft,*44 id. 415, in support of that proposition. This point was not taken at the circuit, nor in the defendant’s answer, and no exception taken at the circuit presents it for our consideration, and the point must therefore be deemed waived. The case comes before us on exceptions taken at the circuit, and we can pass upon no questions except those arising upon exceptions duly taken to some decision made by the circuit judge at the. trial, or in the final disposition of the cause.

The nonsuit should be set aside, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

*New trial granted.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2014

No. 04-14-00092-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E., JR., Et al., Children,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-00722

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief for Tommi Jo Torres is 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 111.105-28 Internal combustion engines.

Internal combustion engines installed in Class I Divisions 1 and 2 (Zones 1 and 2) must meet the provisions of ASTM F2876-10 (incorporated by reference, see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16366, Mar. 16, 2023]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DEBORAH BISHOP, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2048

)

DAVIS REED and IMPERI CORP., )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Keith Meyer, Judge.

Christopher E. Hewitt and Scott A. Kuhn 

of Kuhn Law Firm, P.A., Fort Myers, for 

Appellant. 

Ronald W. Gregory, II, of Gregory Law 

Firm, P.L., St. Petersburg, for Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 2.3

                               CLOSING DOCUMENT


 Pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 22, 2004
 (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among Integrated Performance Systems, Inc.
 ("IPS"), and Best Circuit Boards, Inc. ("BCB") d/b/a Lone Star Circuits
 (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), and as modified pursuant to an
 Addendum executed on an even date herewith, the Parties have come on this
 the 24th day of November, 2004, and have agreed to the closing of the
 transaction.

 In accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, the
 following agreements and documentation were completed at closing:

      (1)  Issuance of 193,829 shares of Series F Preferred stock of IPS
      (the exact number of shares to be determined in accordance with the
      completion of the Capital Raise as described in the Merger Agreement)
      to the majority shareholder of BCB;

      (2)  Execution of three promissory notes as follows:  (a) A
      $3,000,000.00 note payable to majority shareholder of BCB and
      convertible into the stock of IPS; (b)  A $1,000,000.00 note payable to
      the majority shareholder of BCB and convertible into the stock of IPS;
      and (c) A $200,000.00 note payable to the majority shareholder of BCB
      as satisfaction of advances made from such majority shareholder to IPS
      leading to the close of this transaction;

      (3)  Transfer of certain consideration into escrow pending resolution
      of specified liabilities;

      (4)  All merger documents, including schedules and exhibits, were
      approved;

      (5)  Articles of Merger were prepared for filing with the Texas
      Secretary of State's office;

 All such documents referenced above, including all schedules and exhibits,
 all notes evidencing merger consideration, etc., are hereby incorporated by
 reference as if fully set out herein.

 SIGNED this the 24th day of November, 2004.


 /s/ D. Ronald Allen                     /s/  Brad Jacoby
 ------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
 Integrated Performance Systems, Inc.    Best Circuit Boards, Inc.
 By:  D. Ronald Allen                    By:  Brad Jacoby
 Its: President/Chairman                 Its: President/Chairman
April 21, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Supplemental Documentation for petition Docket ID FAA-2015-0161

Dear Sir or Madam,

This is to notify that we have been contacted by FAA personnel from the Office of 

Rulemaking, in response to our previous letter dated April 6, 2015.

We also would like to notify that regarding our petition, we will submit our proprietary 

supplemental documents separately, in accordance with the instructions provided by 

afore mentioned FAA personnel. 

Please do not hesitate to contact us, if there is anything else that would need our 

attention regarding the matter. 

Respectfully,

Bryan Archer 

President

Galaxy UAV Systems (a subsidiary of Galaxy Aviation Inc.)

6215 Kirby Lane, Frisco, Texas 75035

Tel: 469-766-0420

Email: bryan.archer@galaxyuav.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          37,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,028
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           402
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,722
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,608)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,608)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,608)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.006)


</TABLE>
UAS#: Date Issue Discovered Date Issue Addressed Issue Description & 

Maintenance Conducted

Maintenance Performed 

By:

Software Updates

Airframe

Engines

Propellers

Camera Gimbal

Landing Gear

Vibration Dampening

Other:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 15-5016 September Term, 2015

1:11-cv-00766-ABJ

Filed On: January 21, 2016 [1594900]

Christopher Van Hollen, Jr., 

 Appellee

v.

Federal Election Commission and Hispanic

Leadership Fund, 

 Appellees

Center for Individual Freedom,

 Appellant

------------------------------

Consolidated with 15-5017

O R D E R

 It is ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the Clerk withhold issuance of

the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing

or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41. This

instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party to move for

expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken R. Meadows

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #15-5016 Document #1594900 Filed: 01/21/2016 Page 1 of 1
#### § 84.81 Duties.

This subpart does not require a recipient to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where a recipient's personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the recipient has the burden of proving that compliance with this subpart would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the head of the recipient or their designee after considering all the recipient's resources available for use in the funding and operation of the program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this part would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the recipient shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services provided by the recipient.
§ 708.7 Hearing procedures. ( a ) If an employee timely files a petition for a hearing under § 708.6, the Deputy Staff Director shall select the time, date, and location for the hearing.
( b ) The hearing shall be conducted by an impartial hearing official.
( c ) The Commission, as the creditor agency, will have the burden of proving the existence of the debt.
( d ) The employee requesting the hearing shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate that the existence or amount of the debt is in error.
§ 800.402 Contract quality assurance. ( a ) *General.* This section prescribes general policies and procedures to ensure that services acquired under MSP Program contracts conform to the contract's quality requirements.
( b ) *Internal controls.* OPM may periodically evaluate the contractor's system of internal controls under the quality assurance program required by the contract and will acknowledge in writing if the system is inconsistent with the requirements set forth in the contract. OPM's reviews do not diminish the contractor's obligation to implement and maintain an effective and efficient system to apply the internal controls.
( c ) *Performance standards.* ( 1 ) OPM will issue specific performance standards for MSP Program contracts and will inform MSP issuers of the applicable performance standards prior to negotiations for the contract year. OPM may benchmark its standards against standards generally accepted in the insurance industry. OPM may authorize nationally recognized standards to be used to fulfill this requirement.
( 2 ) MSP issuers must comply with the performance standards issued pursuant to this section.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Treasure Explorations Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
Gelfand, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
25th day of September, 2007.


/s/ Howard Gelfand
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.1


 


KIBUSH
CAPITAL CORP.


(A
Nevada Corporation)


 


UNANIMOUS
CONSENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 


OF


KIBUSH
CAPITAL CORP.


 


We
do hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Kibush Capital Corp., a Nevada corporation, the following resolution,
upon motions made, seconded and carried, was duly adopted and is now in full force and effect:


 


WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Corporation deem it in the best interests of the Corporation to extend the S1 which went effective
October 25th 2019, for a further period of 12 months, ending April 30th 2021.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Corporation is hereby authorized to extend the period without any further action or confirmation
by the Corporation;


 


The
undersigned, do hereby certify that we are members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation; that the attached is a true and
correct copy of resolutions duly adopted and ratified at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly convened
and held in accordance with its by-laws and the laws of the State of Nevada, as transcribed by us from the minutes; and that the
same have not in any way been modified, repealed or rescinded and are in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, We have hereunto set our hands as Members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation as of April 15, 2020.


 





	 	
	 	Warren
    Sheppard, Director
###### Editorial Note on Part 303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 303 appear at 64 FR 6249, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 303.71 [Reserved]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1840 

To ensure States receive adoption incentive payments for fiscal year 2008 

in accordance with the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing 

Adoptions Act of 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2009 

Mr. CAMP (for himself and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To ensure States receive adoption incentive payments for 

fiscal year 2008 in accordance with the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 

2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Incentives 

5 for the Adoption of Children with Special Needs Act of 

6 2009’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1840 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION ON PAYMENTS FOR 

2 FISCAL YEAR 2008. 

3 Effective as if included in the enactment of the Omni4 bus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–8), title 

5 II of division F of such Act is amended under the heading 

6 ‘‘CHILDREN AND FAMILIES SERVICES PROGRAMS’’ under 

7 the heading ‘‘ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAM8 ILIES’’, by striking ‘‘That without regard to the fiscal year 

9 limitations set forth in section 473A of the Social Security 

10 Act, from the amounts appropriated herein, the Secretary 

11 shall pay adoption incentives for fiscal year 2008 in the 

12 same manner as such incentives were awarded in fiscal 

13 year 2008 for the previous fiscal year: Provided further,’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS