alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Yu-Yun Tristan
Kuo, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA BIOLOGIC PRODUCTS, INC. (the
Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 31st day of March, 2011.

| | /s/
      Yu-Yun Tristan Kuo                      
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | Yu-Yun Tristan Kuo                                
| | Chief Financial Officer                           
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Biologic Products, Inc. and will be retained by
China Biologic Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         166,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     75,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,478,806
<PP&E>                                         137,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,244,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,161,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,760
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,752,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,244,471
<SALES>                                      3,591,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,591,917
<CGS>                                        2,818,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,818,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,180,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (501,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (502,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (502,520)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.156)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.156)


</TABLE>
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of Pacific Sands,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ended  September  30, 2005,  Michael D. Michie
hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes  - Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to the  best of his
knowledge:

1. The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in the quarterly  report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 15, 2006

                                                    /s/ Michael D. Michie
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Michael  D. Michie,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
ULTRADATA Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-01492) on Form S-8 of ULTRADATA Corporation of our report dated March 11,
1997, except as to Note 5, which is as of May 6, 1997, related to the balance
sheets of ULTRADATA Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form
10-K of ULTRADATA Corporation.

                                        KMPG PEAT MARWICK LLP

San Jose, California
May 6, 1997
§ 75.470 Taxes (including Value Added Tax). ( a ) For states, local governments and Indian tribes: ( 1 ) Taxes that a governmental unit is legally required to pay are allowable, except for self-assessed taxes that disproportionately affect Federal programs or changes in tax policies that disproportionately affect Federal programs.
( 2 ) Gasoline taxes, motor vehicle fees, and other taxes that are in effect user fees for benefits provided to the Federal Government are allowable.
( 3 ) This provision does not restrict the authority of the HHS awarding agency to identify taxes where Federal participation is inappropriate. Where the identification of the amount of unallowable taxes would require an inordinate amount of effort, the cognizant agency for indirect costs may accept a reasonable approximation thereof.
( b ) For nonprofit organizations and IHEs: ( 1 ) In general, taxes which the non-Federal entity is required to pay and which are paid or accrued in accordance with GAAP, and payments made to local governments in lieu of taxes which are commensurate with the local government services received are allowable, except for: ( i ) Taxes from which exemptions are available to the non-Federal entity directly or which are available to the non-Federal entity based on an exemption afforded the Federal Government and, in the latter case, when the HHS awarding agency makes available the necessary exemption certificates,
( ii ) Special assessments on land which represent capital improvements, and
( iii ) Federal income taxes.
( 2 ) Any refund of taxes, and any payment to the non-Federal entity of interest thereon, which were allowed as Federal award costs, will be credited either as a cost reduction or cash refund, as appropriate, to the Federal Government. However, any interest actually paid or credited to an non-Federal entity incident to a refund of tax, interest, and penalty will be paid or credited to the Federal Government only to the extent that such interest accrued over the period during which the non-Federal entity has been reimbursed by the Federal Government for the taxes, interest, and penalties.
( c ) Value Added Tax (VAT) Foreign taxes charged for the purchase of goods or services that a non-Federal entity is legally required to pay in country is an allowable expense under Federal awards. Foreign tax refunds or applicable credits under Federal awards refer to receipts, or reduction of expenditures, which operate to offset or reduce expense items that are allocable to Federal awards as direct or indirect costs. To the extent that such credits accrued or received by the non-Federal entity relate to allowable cost, these costs must be credited to the HHS awarding agency either as costs or cash refunds. If the costs are credited back to the Federal award, the non-Federal entity may reduce the Federal share of costs by the amount of the foreign tax reimbursement, or where Federal award has not expired, use the foreign government tax refund for approved activities under the Federal award with prior approval of the HHS awarding agency.
#### § 111.55-3 Circuit connections.

The load side of each circuit must be connected to the fuse end of a fused-switch or to the coil end of a circuit breaker, except a generator which is connected to either end of a circuit breaker.
#### § 400.317 Service requirements.

In providing targeted assistance services to refugees, a State must adhere to the same requirements as are applied to the provision of refugee social services under § 400.156.
§ 156.210 QHP rate and benefit information. ( a ) *General rate requirement.* A QHP issuer must set rates for an entire benefit year, or for the SHOP, plan year.
( b ) *Rate and benefit submission.* A QHP issuer must submit rate and benefit information to the Exchange.
( c ) *Rate justification.* A QHP issuer must submit to the Exchange a justification for a rate increase prior to the implementation of the increase. A QHP issuer must prominently post the justification on its Web site.
( d ) *Rate requirements* for *stand-alone dental plans.* For benefit and plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2024: ( 1 ) *Age on effective date.* The premium rate charged by an issuer of stand-alone dental plans may vary with respect to the particular plan or coverage involved by determining the enrollee's age. Any age calculation for rating and eligibility purposes must be based on the age as of the time of policy issuance or renewal.
( 2 ) *Guaranteed rates.* An issuer of stand-alone dental plans must set guaranteed rates.
[77 FR 18469, Mar. 27, 2012, as amended at 88 FR 25922, Apr. 27, 2023]
3,

Press Office
1325 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463
Phone: Local 523-4065 Toll Free 800-424-9530

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: FRED EILAND
JULY 12, 1982 SHARON SNYDER

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION RELEASES PAC FIGURES

WASHINGTON -~ The number of political action committees (PAC's) has continued.

to grow during the past six months, but at a slower rate.

Figures released today by the FEC, for the first six months of 1982,
indicate the number of PAC's in existence increased by 8%. The average
six-month growth rate since 1978, has been 108.

Numbering 3,149 at the end of June 1982, the number of PAC's now in existence
is five times the number that were active at the end of 1974, just prior to the
implementation of the 1974 Amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act -
legislation which outlined for the first time the legal parameters of PAC activity.

Yearly increases, since 1976, have averaged 20%, with the exception of
1979-80, when the growth actually increased by 28%. The most dramatic increase
was between 1974 and 1976, when PAC ranks swelled by 883.

PAC's are viewed by many campaign finance experts as a dominant force in
politics. Their numbers and the amount of money they spend in Federal campaigns
have continued to increase with each election cycle.

According to FEC data, the "non-connected" category of PAC's shows the ©
greatest growth in 1981. That category includes ideological committees and
committees sponsored by issue groups.

Information on the amount of money raised and spent by Pac's during 1981
and the first three months of 1982 was released last month by the FEC. Updated
figures on PAC activity for the 1981-82 election cycle will be released in the
future.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

PRESS OFFICE SULY 1982
(202) 523-4065

{e00) 424.9530

" GROWTH—FROM 1974

years!

COMMITTEE TYPE
CORPORATE
LAagOR

‘TRADE/MEMBERSHIP
HEALTH

NON-CONNECTED
COOPERATIVE
‘CORPORATION W/O STOCK

TOTAL

‘on November 24, 1975, the Cammisnin itued Advisory Opinion 1975-23 "SUNPAG.”
20m May 11, 1976, the President signed the Fedaral Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976, P.t. 94-283.
#### Lissa M. Barnett, Respondent, *v.*The Vaughan Institute, Appellant.

*Barnett*v. *Vaughan Institute,*134 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued December 13, 1909;

decided January 4, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 16, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action for an injunction to restrain the defendant from using certain premises as a sanitarium or hospital in alleged violation of a restrictive covenant.

*George T. Hogg*for appellant.

*George B. Covington*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.
#### § 96.92 Termination of funding.

Where a State determines pursuant to section 675(c)(11) of the Community Services Block Grant Act that it will terminate present or future funding of any community action agency or migrant and seasonal farmworker organization which received funding in the previous fiscal year, the State must provide the organization with notice and an opportunity for hearing on the record prior to terminating funding. If a review by the Secretary of the State's final decision to terminate funding is requested pursuant to section 676A, the request must be made in writing, within 30 days of notification by the State of its final decision to terminate funding. The Department will confirm or reject the State's finding of cause, normally within 90 days. If a request for a review has been made, the State may not discontinue present or future funding until the Department confirms the State's finding of cause. If no request for a review is made within the 30-day limit, the State's decision will be effective at the expiration of that time.

[52 FR 37968, Oct. 13, 1987]
§ 75.371 Remedies for noncompliance. If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in § 75.207. If the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: ( a ) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity.
( b ) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance.
( c ) Wholly or partly suspend (suspension of award activities) or terminate the Federal award.
( d ) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR part 180 and HHS awarding agency regulations at 2 CFR part 376 (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a HHS awarding agency).
( e ) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program.
( f ) Take other remedies that may be legally available.
Original,

No. 5787.

#### Donovan’s Case.

Submitted June 6, 1968.

Decided June 28, 1968.

*William F Harrington,*President of the New Hampshire Bar Association, *pro se.*

*Verdi McKay*for Daniel E. Donovan, Jr.

Kenison, C. J.

Petition, filed in this court by William F. Harrington, in his capacity as President of the New Hampshire Bar Association, praying that Daniel E. Donovan, Jr. of Winchendon, Massachusetts be removed from office as an attorney pursuant to RSA 311:8. On August 24, 1954, Daniel E. Donovan, Jr. was admitted to practice as an attorney in this state (RSA 311:2), at which time he took and subscribed his oath of office. RSA 311:6.

The facts are not disputed. Pertinent parts of the petition read as follows:

“4. That the above named Daniel E. Donovan, Jr., on Monday, April 29, 1968 in Merrimack County Superior Court pleaded Guilty to an information filed by the County Attorney for said County charging the said Daniel E. Donovan, Jr., with embezzlement of Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars from the Estate of Alice Tremblay, Ten Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy Nine Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($10,979.61) from the Estate of Arthur Tremblay and Nine Thousand Two Hundred Forty Eight Dollars and Ninety Cents ($9,248.90) from the Estate of Arthur Langlois.

“5. On Monday, April 29, 1968, New Hampshire Superior Court Judge George R. Grant, Jr., sentenced the said Daniel E. Donovan, Jr., to the New Hampshire State Prison for three different concurrent terms of not less than one year and one day and not more than five years; that the said Danid E. Donovan, Jr., is now serving his sentence ....

*104“7. That while the said Daniel E. Donovan, Jr., was never a member of the New Hampshire Bar Association, the New Hampshire Bar Association is authorized and accredited by the New Hampshire Supreme Court to bring these proceedings.” See Laws 1873, ch. 115; Laws 1967, ch. 521.

The misappropriation or embezzlement of clients’ funds by an attorney demonstrates such lack of common honesty as to clearly justify an attorney’s disbarment. *Delano’s Case,*58 N. H. 5. The conduct of the attorney in this case is a gross violation of professional ethics and unquestionably demonstrates his unfitness to be a member of the Bar. *Barnard’s Case,*101 N. H. 141; *Sturr v. State Bar of California,*52 Cal. 2d 125. See *Harrington’s Case,*100 N. H. 243, 244; *Donovan’s Case,*108 N. H. 34. The attorney is forthwith disbarred as a member of the Bar of this state and is removed from office. RSA 311:8; Annot. 43 A.L.R. 54.

*So ordered.*

All concurred.
---

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, each of Douglas Biles, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Blaine Miciak, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and
belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: May 23, 2011 | /s/
      Douglas Biles               
|------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                    | Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer)         
|                    |                                       
|Dated: May 23, 2011 | /s/
      Blaine Miciak               
|                    | Blaine Miciak, Controller             
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer)         



---
§ 614.5 Public announcement. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, the National Science Board will make a public announcement of each Board meeting at least one week before the meeting takes place. The announcement will cover: ( 1 ) The time, place, and subject matter of the meeting;
( 2 ) What portions of the meeting, if any, are to be closed to the public; and
( 3 ) The name and telephone number of the official designated to respond to requests for information on the meeting.
( b ) Each such announcement will be promptly posted on the National Science Foundation's Web site at *http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/ .* Immediately following the issuance of such an announcement, it will be submitted for publication in the Federal Register.
( c ) The announcement may be made less than a week before the meeting it announces or after the meeting only if ( 1 ) the Board by record vote determines that agency business requires the meeting to be called on such short or after-the-fact notice and
( 2 ) an announcement is made at the earliest practicable time.
( d ) All or any portion of the announcement of any meeting may be omitted if the Board by record vote determines that the announcement would disclose information which should be withheld under the same standards as apply for closing meetings under § 614.2.
[42 FR 14719, Mar. 16, 1977, as amended at 75 FR 40755, July 14, 2010]