alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010016EN.01011601.xml

| 22.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 16/116 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 16/116

---

European Statistics ***I

P6_TA(2008)0548

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 November 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Statistics (COM(2007)0625 — C6-0346/2007 — 2007/0220(COD))

(2010/C 16 E/34)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0625), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0625),

| — | having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0346/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0346/2007),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0349/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0349/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.   Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2007)0220

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 19 November 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Statistics and repealing Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1101/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transmission of data subject to statistical confidentiality to the Statistical Office of the European Communities, Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 on Community Statistics, and Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom establishing a Committee on the Statistical Programmes of the European Communities

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 223/2009.)

---
- 2456
- 2457
- 2458
- 2459
- 2460
- 2461
- 2462
#### Hubbell v. Van Shoening, appellant.

*Contract—performance—when time is not of the essence of.*

When time is not of the essence of the contract a party cannot be barred of his rights without notice to perform in a specified reasonable time. *Myers*v. *HeMier,*52 N. Y. 647.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the decision of Mr. Justice Fanoher. The action was brought by John E. Hubbell against Pauline Van Shoening and another, for the specific performance of-a contract to convey three lots of land in the city of Mew York. The case was after a former trial appealed to the court of appeals, and is reported in 58 Barb. 498, and 49 ÍL Y. 326.

*Ira D. Warren,*for appellants.

*John E. Parsons,*for respondent.

Brady, J.

The opinion holds that the facts established did not differ materially from those established upon the first trial. The only point noticed is fully stated in the head-note.

*Judgment affirmed.*-
§ 1604.4 Permissible outside practice. A recipient's written policies may permit a full-time attorney to engage in a specific case or matter that constitutes the outside practice of law if: ( a ) The director of the recipient or the director's designee determines that representation in such case or matter is consistent with the attorney's responsibilities to the recipient's clients;
( b ) Except as provided in § 1604.7, the attorney does not intentionally identify the case or matter with the Corporation or the recipient; and
( c ) The attorney is— ( 1 ) Newly employed and has a professional responsibility to close cases from a previous law practice, and does so on the attorney's own time as expeditiously as possible; or
( 2 ) Acting on behalf of him or herself, a close friend, family member or another member of the recipient's staff; or
( 3 ) Acting on behalf of a religious, community, or charitable group; or
( 4 ) Participating in a voluntary pro bono or legal referral program affiliated with or sponsored by a bar association, other legal organization or religious, community or charitable group.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
interim condensed consolidated statement of Symposium Corporation as of and for
the six months ended June 30, 1999 included in this report on Form 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001069201
<NAME>                        Symposium Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                           <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,307,590
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  88,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                   36,538
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,400,439
<PP&E>                                         32,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,206,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,694
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       12,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,064,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,206,299
<SALES>                                        168,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,863
<CGS>                                          47,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  47,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,249,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               69,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,163,353)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,163,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (25,110)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,188,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.13)



</TABLE>
#### Hutchins v. Merrill.

Submission of controversy between Waldo Hutchins and another, residuary legatees under the last will of Eli Merrill, deceased, and the executors of said will concerning the provisions of the will, the plaintiffs claiming that a certain accumulation of rents in the hands of the executors belonged to the residuary estate.

*Waldo Hutchins,*for plaintiffs.

*Edgar M. Cullen,*for defendants.

Tappen, J.

The opinion held that as it did not appear that any estate would reach the residuary legatees, judgment should be given for defendant.

*■Judgment accordingly.*
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.20 Separation of cash handling and accounting functions. The State plan shall provide that the following requirements and criteria to separate the cash handling and accounting functions are in effect. ( a ) *IV-D responsibility.* The IV-D agency will maintain methods of administration designed to assure that persons responsible for handling cash receipts of support do not participate in accounting or operating functions which would permit them to conceal in the accounting records the misuse of support receipts. Such methods of administration shall follow generally recognized accounting standards.
( b ) *Scope.* The requirement in paragraph (a) of this section applies to persons who participate in the collection, accounting or operating functions which include: ( 1 ) IV-D agency employees and employees of any other State or local agency to which IV-D functions have been delegated.
( 2 ) Employees of a court or law enforcement official performing under a cooperative agreement with the IV-D agency.
( 3 ) Employees of any private or governmental entity from which the IV-D agency purchases services.
( c ) *Exception.* The Regional Office may grant a waiver to sparsely populated geographical areas, where the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section would necessitate the hiring of unreasonable numbers of additional staff. The IV-D agency must document such administrative infeasibility and provide an alternative system of controls that reasonably insures that support collections will not be misused.
[44 FR 28803, May 17, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 57281, Dec. 23, 1982]
#### § 1326.92 Place.

The hearing must be held on a date and at a time and place determined by the Secretary, or his or her designee with due regard for convenience, and necessity of the parties or their representatives. The site of the hearing shall be accessible to individuals with disabilities.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 52]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 547]]

Public Law 112-52
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment of 
   repayment contracts between the United States and the Uintah Water 
       Conservancy District. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2011 -  [H.R. 818]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE 
                              UNITED STATES AND THE UINTAH WATER 
                              CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall allow for prepayment of the 
repayment contract no. 6-05-01-00143 between the United States and the 
Uintah Water Conservancy District dated June 3, 1976, and supplemented 
and amended on November 1, 1985, and on December 30, 1992, providing for 
repayment of municipal and industrial water delivery facilities for 
which repayment is provided pursuant to such contract, under terms and 
conditions similar to those used in implementing section 210 of the 
Central Utah Project Completion Act (Public Law 102-575), as amended. 
The prepayment--
            (1) shall result in the United States recovering the net 
        present value of all repayment streams that would have been 
        payable to the United States if this Act was not in effect;
            (2) may be provided in several installments to reflect 
        substantial completion of the delivery facilities being prepaid, 
        and any increase in the repayment obligation resulting from 
        delivery of water in addition to the water being delivered under 
        this contract as of the date of enactment of this Act;
            (3) shall be adjusted to conform to a final cost allocation 
        including costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation, but 
        unallocated as of the date of the enactment of this Act that are 
        allocable to the water delivered under this contract;
            (4) may not be adjusted on the basis of the type of 
        prepayment financing used by the District; and
            (5) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> shall be made such that total 
        repayment is made not later than September 30, 2022.

    Approved November 9, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 818:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-247 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            Oct. 24, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-07-004] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

March 26, 2007 at 1 p.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

 Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1110 (Preliminary)(Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on March 26, 2007; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before April 2, 2007.). 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: March 19, 2007. 
      ( print page 13515)    
By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 07-1444 Filed 3-20-07; 2:22 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 2 / Thursday, January 4, 2007 / Presidential Documents 451 

Proclamation 8096 of December 29, 2006 

To Extend Nondiscriminatory Treatment (Normal Trade Relations Treatment) to the Products of Vietnam 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

1. Vietnam has demonstrated a strong desire to build a friendly and cooperative relationship with the United States and has been found to be in full 

compliance with the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (the ‘‘1974 Act’’) (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.). 

2. Pursuant to section 4002 of H.R. 6111, signed on December 20, 2006, 

I hereby determine that chapter 1 of title IV of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 

2431–2439) should no longer apply to Vietnam. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States of America, including but not limited 

to section 4002 of Public Law 109–432 do proclaim that: 

1. Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be 

extended to the products of Vietnam, which shall no longer be subject 

to chapter 1 of title IV of the 1974 Act. 

2. The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Vietnam 

shall be effective as of the date of signature of this proclamation. 

3. All provisions of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that are 

inconsistent with this proclamation are superseded to the extent of such 

inconsistency. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth 

day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfirst. 

[FR Doc. 07–00003 

Filed 1–3–07; 11:03 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PRESDOCSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        [HENRY & PETERS, P.C. LETTERHEAD]

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.


We consent to the use of our report dated November 6, 2002, on the consolidated
financial statements of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2002 and 2001, and for each of the years in the three-year period
ended September 30, 2002, in Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2002.

                                                     /s/ HENRY & PETERS, P.C.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     HENRY & PETERS, P.C.



Tyler, Texas
December 19, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LAURA F. KENNEY,

Case No. 14-12721

Plaintiff,

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

v.

Elizabeth A. Stafford

United States Magistrate Judge

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 27); (2) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

ATTORNEY’S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

2412 (ECF NO. 21); AND (3) AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES IN THE

AMOUNT OF $5,227.50

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s August 29, 2015

Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiff’s attorney’s Petition for Attorneys’

Fees under pursuant the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 

(Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 27). As set forth in the Report and

Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant in part

Plaintiff’s attorney’s petition and award her attorney fees in the amount of $5,227.50. 

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely

objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d),

2:14-cv-12721-PDB-EAS Doc # 28 Filed 10/19/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 555
the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31); GRANTS

Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Petition for Attorney Fees under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412,

(ECF No. 21); and award fees to her in the amount of $5,277.50. Additionally, as

stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Defendant Commissioner has 14 days

from the date of this Order to determine whether Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to

the United States that would off-set the EAJA fees. If such debt exists, then the EAJA

fees should be offset by the amount of the debt and the remainder paid to Plaintiff’s

attorney. If, however, Plaintiff does not owe any debt to the United States than the

EAJA fees shall be paid directly to Plaintiff’s attorney.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: October 19, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each

attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on

October 19, 2015.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-12721-PDB-EAS Doc # 28 Filed 10/19/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 556
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-12424-PDB-MJH

JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned IP address

68.40.105.77,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily dismisses John Doe

(“Defendant”) from this action without prejudice. John Doe was assigned the IP address 

68.40.105.77. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendant John Doe has neither answered 

Plaintiff’s Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment.

Consistent herewith Plaintiff consents to the Court having its case closed for 

administrative purposes.

Dated: September 24, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti

pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Suite #433

Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Phone: (248) 203-7800

Attorney for Plaintiff

2:14-cv-12424-PDB-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 41
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 24, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of 

record and interested parties through this system.

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti_______

Paul J. Nicoletti

2:14-cv-12424-PDB-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 42
# C_2008012EN.01000601.xml

| 17.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/6 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to make a winding-up order in respect of Eurolife Assurance (International) Limited

(Publication of extract from the winding-up decision made in accordance with Article 14(1) of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

(2008/C 12/06)

| Insurance Undertaking | Eurolife Assurance (International) Limited Eurolife Building 1 Corral Road Gibraltar | Eurolife Assurance (International) Limited | Eurolife Building | 1 Corral Road | Gibraltar |
| --------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------- | --------------- | --------- |
| Eurolife Assurance (International) Limited | | | | | |
| Eurolife Building | | | | | |
| 1 Corral Road | | | | | |
| Gibraltar | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of decision | 14.11.2007
Entry into force: 14.11.2007
Order that the Company be wound up by the Supreme Court of Gibraltar under the provisions of the Companies Act, the Insurance Companies Act and the Insurers (Reorganisation and Winding Up) Act; appointment of liquidator; direction that the liquidator is to stop carrying on the long term business of the company with immediate effect | | | | |
| Competent authorities | Supreme Court of Gibraltar Chancery Jurisdiction 277 Main Street Gibraltar | Supreme Court of Gibraltar | Chancery Jurisdiction | 277 Main Street | Gibraltar |
| Supreme Court of Gibraltar | | | | | |
| Chancery Jurisdiction | | | | | |
| 277 Main Street | | | | | |
| Gibraltar | | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Financial Services Commission Suite 943 Europort Gibraltar | Financial Services Commission | Suite 943 | Europort | Gibraltar |
| Financial Services Commission | | | | | |
| Suite 943 | | | | | |
| Europort | | | | | |
| Gibraltar | | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | Frederick White Grant Thornton (Gibraltar) Limited 6A Queensway Gibraltar | Frederick White | Grant Thornton (Gibraltar) Limited | 6A Queensway | Gibraltar |
| Frederick White | | | | | |
| Grant Thornton (Gibraltar) Limited | | | | | |
| 6A Queensway | | | | | |
| Gibraltar | | | | | |
| Applicable law | Gibraltar Law | | | | |

---