alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      10.33




The
      following is a summary of an oral agreement (the “Oral Agreement”) between the
      Holders of 6% Secured Convertible Notes due September 27, 2010 and/or 6% Secured
      Convertible Notes due December 20, 2010 (collectively, the “Notes”), which was
      made in order to clarify the parties’ intentions with respect to certain terms
      of the Notice and Form of Consent and Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.32 to
      Tasker Products Corp.’s (the “Company”) quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the
“10-Q”). The Oral Agreement clarifies that the parties’ intentions with respect
      to numbered paragraph (ii), when read in conjunction with the paragraph
      immediately following the numbered paragraphs, of the Notice and Form of Consent
      can be summarized as follows:




The
      conversion price adjustments applicable to the Notes that would otherwise be
      made in connection with the Qualified Raise, the Revolving Financing, and the
      Bridge Loans (all as defined in the 10-Q) have been waived in favor of a new
      conversion price as follows: (A) in the event that the conversion price for
      the
      notes expected to be issued in connection with the Qualified Raise, the
      Revolving Financing and the Bridge Loans is greater than or equal to $0.040
      per
      share, the new conversion price is reduced to $0.044 per share, and the
      effective date for this new conversion price is July 30, 2008; (B) in the event
      that the conversion price for the notes expected to be issued in connection
      with
      the Qualified Raise, the Revolving Financing and the Bridge Loans is less than
      $0.040 per share, the new conversion price will be further reduced to the price
      that equals the product of the conversion price of such notes multiplied by
      1.1.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DONETTA DAGGETT, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

PATRICK DONAHOE, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:14-cv-13368 

District Judge Bernard A. Friedman 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER ADJOURNING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

 This matter came before me for a status conference on August 11, 2015. 

Pursuant to a stipulated order I signed on August 5, 2015, the discovery deadline 

has been extended from August 7, 2015 to October 7, 2015 and the dispositive 

motion deadline has likewise been extended from October 7, 2015 to December 7, 

2015. (DE 31.) 

 Accordingly, the final pretrial conference will be adjourned from January 7, 

2016 to MARCH 8, 2016 AT 10:00 A.M., at which time (or soon thereafter) a 

trial date will be set. In addition, if the parties do not consent to my jurisdiction 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c), I will facilitate a settlement conference as part of 

the final pretrial conference. If the parties choose to consent to my service as trial 

2:14-cv-13368-BAF-APP Doc # 33 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 185
2 

judge in this matter, at the time of the final pretrial conference, I will set a date and 

time for settlement conference with an alternate facilitator. 

 The parties are required to follow all of my practice guidelines throughout 

this process, and I direct them in particular to the guidelines titled “Special 

Requirements for Dispositive Motions,” “Settlement Conferences,” and “Trials,” 

which can be accessed at the Eastern District of Michigan website: 

https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/index.cfm?pageFunction=chambers&judgeid=51. 

Dated: August 12, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that on August 12, 2015, a copy of this document was sent to 

parties of record electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/ Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

 

2:14-cv-13368-BAF-APP Doc # 33 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 186
EXHIBIT 21


   Superior Services, Inc.
   10150 W. National Ave.
   Suite 350
   West Allis, WI 53227

   Superior Cranberry Creek Landfill, Inc.
   2510 Engel Road
   Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

   Superior Construction Services, Inc.

   Hardrock, Inc.

   Summit, Inc.
   2510 Engel Road
   Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

   Superior Special Services, Inc.
   100 West Larsen Drive
   P.O. Box 1323
   Fond du Lac, WI 54936-1323

   Valley Sanitation Co., Inc.
   1215 Klement Street
   Fort Atkinson, WI 53538

   Superior Services of Elgin, Inc.
   1790 Gilpen
   P.O. Box 334
   South Elgin, IL 60177

   Superior Glacier Ridge, Inc.
   N7396 Highway V
   Horicon, WI 53032

   Land & Gas Reclamation, Inc.
   N7296 Highway V
   Horicon, WI 53032

   Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.
   559 Progress Drive
   P.O. Box 168
   Hartland, WI 53029

   Superior Emerald Park Landfill, Inc.
   W124 S10629 South 124th Street
   Muskego, WI 53130

   Superior FCR Landfill, Inc.
   6480 County Road 12N
   Buffalo, MN 55313

   Superior Seven Mile Creek Landfill, Inc.
   8001 Olson Drive
   Eau Claire, WI 54703

   Superior Oak Ridge Landfill, Inc.
   1741 Sulphur Springs Road
   Ballwin, MO 63021

   Superior of Missouri, Inc.
   2264 Creve Coeur Mill Road
   Maryland Heights, MO 63043

   Superior of Ohio, Inc.
   1515 Harmon Avenue
   Columbus, Oh 43223

   Superior Services of Michigan, Inc.

   Superior Waste Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.
   P.O. Box 0
   R.D. 2, Route 219
   Brockway, PA 15824

   Superior Hickory Meadows Landfill, Inc.
   W3106 Schneider Road
   Hilbert, WI 54129

   Resource Recovery Transfer & Transportation, Inc. ("R2T2")
   Speedway Sanitation, Inc.
   1430 Speedway Blvd.
   P.O. Box 540
   Lincoln, AL 35096

   Holt Landfill Co., Inc.
   4831 12th Street N.E.
   Holt, AL 35404

   Urban Sanitation Corporation
   1319 No Business Creek Road
   Ragland, AL 35131

   Superior Maple Hill Landfill, Inc.
   31226 Intrepid Road
   Macon, MO 63552

   Homestand Land Corp.
   5635 Toby Road
   Kersey, PA 15846

   Sharps Incinerator of Fort
   1203 Klement Street
   Fort Atkinson, WI 53538

   Speedway Sanitation, Inc.
   1430 Speedway Blvd. 
   P.O. Box 540
   Lincoln, AL 35096

   Superior Oakland Marsh Landfill
   (f/k/a Noble Road Landfill)
   170 Noble Road East
   P.O. Box 275
   Shiloh, OH 44878
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc.and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Stephen Rade, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



     By: /s/ Stephen Rade
         ------------------------------
         Stephen Rade
         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
         March 30, 2004
#### § 88.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to provide for the enforcement of the Church Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 300a-7; the Coats-Snowe Amendment, section 245 of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 238n; the Weldon Amendment, e.g., Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law 117-328, div. H, title V General Provisions, section 507(d)(1) (Dec. 29, 2022); Sections 1303(b)(1)(A), (b)(4), and (c)(2)(A), and 1411(b)(5)(A), and 1553 of the ACA, 42 U.S.C. 18023(b)(1)(A), (b)(4), and (c)(2)(A), 18081(b)(5)(A), and 18113; certain Medicare and Medicaid provisions, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-1(h), 1320c-11, 1395i-5, 1395w-22(j)(3)(B), 1395x(e), 1395x(y)(1), 1395cc(f), 1396a(a), 1396a(w)(3), 1396u-2(b)(3)(B), 1397j-1(b), and 14406; the Helms, Biden, 1978, and 1985 Amendments, 22 U.S.C. 2151b(f), *accord, e.g.,* Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law 117-328, div. K, title VII, section 7018 (Dec. 29, 2022); 22 U.S.C. 7631(d); 42 U.S.C. 280g-1(d), 290bb-36(f), 1396f, 1396s(c)(2)(B)(ii); 5106i(a)); and 29 U.S.C. 669(a)(5), referred to collectively as the “Federal health care conscience protection statutes.”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANNIE LOIS SIMILTON,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-12648

v.

HON. AVERN COHN

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 22)

AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 20)

AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 19)

AND

DISMISSING CASE

I.

This is a social security case. Plaintiff Annie Lois Similton appeals from the final

determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not

disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was

referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the

Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment. See Docs. 19, 20. 

On July 14, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation

(MJRR) recommending that the Commissioner’s motion be granted, that plaintiff’s

motion be denied, and the case be dismissed. (Doc. 22).

2:14-cv-12648-AC-MKM Doc # 23 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 661
II.

Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections

has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any

further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d

1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's

report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the

magistrate judge’s recommendations. 

Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED

as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Commissioner’s motion for summary

judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This case

is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

 S/Avern Cohn 

 AVERN COHN

Dated: August 12, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 Detroit, Michigan

2

2:14-cv-12648-AC-MKM Doc # 23 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 662
Opinion issued March 8, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00021-CV

———————————

IN RE TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC., 

TRITON VOYAGER ASSET LEASING GMBH, AND TRITON VOYAGER 

ASSET LEASING GMBH, ASGARD US, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., Triton Voyager Asset 

Leasing GmbH, and Triton Voyager Asset Leasing GmbH, Asgard US (collectively, 

“relators”), filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging: (1) the trial court’s

November 29, 2021 order denying relators’ motion to compel independent medical 

examinations of real party in interest, Richard Rhodes, and for temporary injunction 
2

and (2) the trial court’s December 17, 2021 order denying relators’ motion for 

reconsideration.

1

 

Relators have filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. In 

the motion, relators represent that the “parties have amicably settled their 

differences,” rendering the mandamus petition moot. Relators’ motion does not 

include a certificate of conference, but more than ten days have passed since relators’ 

motion was filed, and real party in interest has not opposed the relief requested in 

relators’ motion to dismiss their mandamus petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2). 

Accordingly, we grant relators’ motion and dismiss the petition. We dismiss 

all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris.

1 The underlying case is Richard Rhodes v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling 

Inc., Triton Voyager Asset Leasing GmbH, Triton Voyager Asset Leasing GmbH, 

Asgard US, and BOE Exploration & Production LLC, Cause No. 2021-41109, in 

the 61st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Fredericka Phillips

presiding.
Presidential Documents

10879 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 46 

Friday, March 9, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13427 of March 7, 2007 

Extending Privileges and Immunities to the Permanent 

Observer Mission of the Holy See to the United Nations 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 7(b) of the Department 

of State Authorities Act of 2006 (22 U.S.C. 288l), I hereby extend to the 

Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See to the United Nations in 

New York, and to its members, the privileges and immunities enjoyed by 

the diplomatic missions of member states to the United Nations, and members 

of such missions, subject to corresponding conditions and obligations. 

This extension of privileges and immunities is not intended to abridge 

in any respect privileges or immunities that the Permanent Observer Mission 

of the Holy See to the United Nations in New York and its members 

otherwise may have acquired or may acquire by law. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 7, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–1152 

Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRE0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
§ 1.01-25 General flow of functions. ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, has final authority with respect to the functions described in § 1.01-15(b) of this subpart, subject to the rights of appeal set forth in subpart 1.03 of this part.
( b ) ( 1 ) The general course and method by which the functions (other than those dealing with suspension and revocation of credentials described in paragraph (c) of this section) concerning marine safety activities are channeled, begins with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, at the local Sector Office. From this Officer the course is to the Chief, Marine Safety Division, on the staff of the District Commander, and then to the District Commander. From the District Commander, the course is to the Chief of one of the offices with the Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy at Headquarters.
( 2 ) For Activities Europe, the course is from the Officer in Charge, Activities Europe to the staff of the Atlantic Area Commander, then to the Atlantic Area Commander, and then to the Chief of one of the offices with the Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy at Headquarters.
( c ) In proceedings involving the suspension or revocation of a Coast Guard credential issued to an individual, the course and method by which such proceedings are channeled are as follows: ( 1 ) In the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Territory of Guam, the Virgin Islands, and other possessions, the proceedings are initiated by the issuance of a complaint against the holder of the Coast Guard credential. A Coast Guard Investigating Officer, as defined in 46 CFR 5.15, causes the complaint to be served on the person described therein (respondent) who is a holder of a Coast Guard credential. At a hearing the Coast Guard submits evidence to support the allegations of the complaint, while the respondent may submit evidence in rebuttal or mitigation. The Administrative Law Judge renders a decision on the basis of the evidence adduced at the hearing and the law. The Administrative Law Judge's decision is given to the respondent. ( i ) In a case where an appeal is made by either party (Coast Guard or respondent), the notice of appeal is filed in accordance with the procedures of 33 CFR 20.1001(a).
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) In the performance of their duties, all Coast Guard Administrative Law Judges are bound by law and the regulations in this chapter or in 33 CFR chapter I. Statements of policy, clarification of points of procedure, and general administrative instructions are published in *Administrative Law Judges' Circulars* and *Administrative Law Judges' Internal Practices and Procedures Series.* The Chief Administrative Law Judge, located in the Office of the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, maintains a complete file of these publications for reading purposes during normal working hours.
[CGD 88-033, 54 FR 50376, Dec. 6, 1989] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 1.01-25, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
Exhibit 32.1

March 15,
2013
Via EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of MV Oil Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A.Trustee for MV Oil TrustBy:

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
#### § 108.155 Restrictions on means of escape utilized.

A required means of escape may not be a vertical ladder or deck scuttle, except that one of the means of escape may be a vertical ladder or deck scuttle if a stairway would be impracticable.
§ 32.10 Refunds. ( a ) If the hearing official, pursuant to a hearing under this part, determines that a debt is not legally due and owing to the United States, the Secretary shall promptly refund any amount collected by means of administrative wage garnishment.
( b ) Unless required by Federal law or contract, refunds under this part shall not bear interest.
#### § 10.412 Distance and e-learning.

The Coast Guard may allow the training of mariners by means of distance learning and e-learning in accordance with the standards of training and assessment set forth in section B-I/6 (Training and assessment) of the STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see § 10.103 of this part).
§ 115.310 Certification expiration date stickers. ( a ) A Certification Expiration Date Sticker indicates the date upon which the vessel's Certificate of Inspection expires and is provided by the cognizant OCMI in the number required, upon issuance or renewal of the Certificate of Inspection.
( b ) A vessel that is issued a Certificate of Inspection under the provisions of this subchapter must not be operated without a valid Certification Expiration Date Sticker affixed to the vessel on a place that is: ( 1 ) A glass or other smooth surface from which the sticker may be removed without damage to the vessel;
( 2 ) Readily visible to each passenger prior to boarding the vessel and to patrolling Coast Guard law enforcement personnel; and
( 3 ) Acceptable to the Coast Guard marine inspector.
( c ) The Coast Guard marine inspector may require the placement of more than one sticker in order to insure compliance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARK BERMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:14-cv-12720 

v. District Judge Gershwin A. Drain 

 Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, 

et al., 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

(DE 44) 

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s motion to 

compel depositions (DE 44), Defendant’s response (DE 46), and Plaintiff’s reply 

(DE 47). On September 16, 2015, the Court entered a notice of hearing, requiring 

the parties to be present on October 15, 2015. (DE 48.) The parties then notified 

the Court that the case had been settled and the hearing on the motion to compel 

was not necessary. Accordingly, the Court cancelled the October 15, 2015 

hearing. As a result, Plaintiff’s motion to compel is DENIED AS MOOT. (DE 

44.) 

2:14-cv-12720-GAD-APP Doc # 49 Filed 10/05/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 844
2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 5, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on October 5, 2015, electronically and sent to parties of record electronically 

and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:14-cv-12720-GAD-APP Doc # 49 Filed 10/05/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 845
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence Skills will meet in closed session on April 26-27, 2007; at the Strategic Analysis, Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.

                        The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of                               ( print page 15659)                            Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: assess all aspects of nuclear deterrent skills as well as the progress Department of Energy (DoE) has made since the publication of the Chiles Commission report.                    

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e-mail at                         *clifton.phillips@osd.mil*, or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

Dated: March 27, 2007.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-1602 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M