alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      NAME OF ENTITY                       STATE OF INCORPORATION
      --------------                       ----------------------
<S>                                     <C>
First USA Direct Marketing, Inc.        Delaware
First USA Financial Services, Inc.      Utah Industrial Loan Company
First USA Technology, Inc.              Delaware
Gensar Holdings Inc.                    Delaware
Gensar Merchant Processing, Inc.        Delaware
MAGroup, Inc.                           Arizona
Merchant-Link, Inc.                     Delaware
National Card Processing Systems, Inc.  Delaware
Paymentech Data Services, Inc.          Delaware
Paymentech Fleet Services, Inc.         Delaware
Paymentech ICS, Inc.                    Delaware
Paymentech New Hampshire, Inc.          Delaware
Paymentech Management Resources, Inc.   Delaware
Paymentech Merchant Services, Inc.      Nevada
Paymentech Network Services, Inc.       Delaware
</TABLE>
§ 98.49 Nondiscrimination in employment on the basis of religion. ( a ) In general, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, nothing in this part modifies or affects the provision of any other applicable Federal law and regulation relating to discrimination in employment on the basis of religion. ( 1 ) Child care providers that receive assistance through grants or contracts under the CCDF shall not discriminate, on the basis of religion, in the employment of caregivers as defined in § 98.2.
( 2 ) If two or more prospective employees are qualified for any position with a child care provider, this section shall not prohibit the provider from employing a prospective employee who is already participating on a regular basis in other activities of the organization that owns or operates the provider.
( 3 ) Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section shall not apply to employees of child care providers if such employees were employed with the provider on November 5, 1990.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, a sectarian organization may require that employees adhere to the religious tenets and teachings of such organization and to rules forbidding the use of drugs or alcohol.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section, if 80 percent or more of the operating budget of a child care provider comes from Federal and State funds, including direct and indirect assistance under the CCDF, the Lead Agency shall assure that, before any further CCDF assistance is given to the provider, ( 1 ) The grant or contract relating to the assistance, or
( 2 ) The employment policies of the provider specifically provide that no person with responsibilities in the operation of the child care program will discriminate, on the basis of religion, in the employment of any individual as a caregiver, as defined in § 98.2.
[63 FR 39981, July 24, 1998. Redesignated at 81 FR 67584, Sept. 30, 2016]
#### § 671.15 Publication of preliminary determination

Prior to any designation or redesignation of substances pursuant to § 671.14 (including removal of such substances from lists of banned substances or designated pollutants), the Director shall publish notice in the Federal Register of any proposed designation or redesignation, including the basis therefor. The notice shall invite the submission by interested parties, the Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies, within 30 days after the date of publication of notice, of written data, comments, or views with respect to such action.
# Senate Floor Activity - Friday, February 14, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1893 

To prohibit any person which sells to or otherwise disposes of any asset 

through a public-private investment program, including the Public-Private 

Investment Program for Legacy Assets, from purchasing or otherwise 

acquiring any other asset from or through such programs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. BACHUS (for himself and Mr. LATOURETTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit any person which sells to or otherwise disposes 

of any asset through a public-private investment program, including the Public-Private Investment Program 

for Legacy Assets, from purchasing or otherwise acquiring any other asset from or through such programs, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Gaming and Col5 lusion in Public-Private Investment Program Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1893 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DOUBLE-DIPPING. 

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law and in 

3 order to limit conflicts of interest and to prevent arbitrage, 

4 churning, or hedging activities through the use of taxpayer 

5 money, no person who— 

6 (1) sells or otherwise disposes of any asset to 

7 or through any public-private investment program, 

8 including the Public-Private Investment Program for 

9 Legacy Assets established by the Secretary of the 

10 Treasury, in conjunction with the Board of Gov11 ernors of the Federal Reserve System and the Fed12 eral Deposit Insurance Corporation, may purchase 

13 or otherwise acquire any other asset from or through 

14 any such program; and 

15 (2) purchases or otherwise acquires any asset 

16 from or through any such program may sell or oth17 erwise dispose of that or any other asset to or 

18 through any such program. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Michael Glennon, as Administrator de Bonis Non of the Estate of John Glennon, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The Star Company, Appellant.

*Glennon*v. *Star Company,*130 App. Div. 491, affirmed.

(Argued January 18, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the tirst judicial department, entered February 11,1909, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granted a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Frank Verner Johnson*for appellant.

*Herbert C. Smyth, Louis S. Levy and David Haar*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, Lawrence W. Briscoe, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxygen, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 7, 2008
    /s/  Lawrence W. BriscoeLawrence W. BriscoeChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of PURE Bioscience (the Company) hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

| | (i) | the
accompanying report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended July 31, 2008
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |     |                                                  
|------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  October 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Andrew J. Buckland                           
|                         |     | Andrew J. Buckland       
Chief Financial Officer
|                         |     |                                                  

This certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-171244, 333-159592, and 333-149662 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-171944, 333-166011, and 333-158516 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 7, 2011,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of EnteroMedics Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the January 1, 2009 adoption of new
authoritative accounting guidance regarding the financial reporting for outstanding equity-linked financial instruments), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/S/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP 
|Minneapolis, MN
March 7, 2011
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-215 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Procurement 

 Memorandum of Understanding between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWITZERLAND 

Signed at Bern and Washington 

November 29, 2006 and February 15, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SWITZERLAND 

Defense: Procurement 

Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Bern and Washington November 29, 2006 

 and February 15, 2007; 

 Entered into force February 15, 2007.
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES FEDERAL ELECTION

COMMISSION,

 Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 06–1247 (CKK)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is this 12th day

of September, 2007, hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s [18] Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED-IN-PART

and DENIED-IN-PART; it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s [19] Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED-INPART and DENIED-IN-PART; it is further 

ORDERED that the following regulations are remanded to the Federal Election

Commission for further action consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion: 11

C.F.R. § 109.21(c) (coordination content regulations); 11 C.F.R. §109.21(d) (coordination

conduct regulations); 11 C.F.R. § 100.24(a)(2) (definition of “voter registration activity”); and 11

C.F.R. § 100.24(a)(3) (definition of “get-out-the-vote activity”); it is further

Case 1:06-cv-01247-CKK Document 35 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED in its entirety.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cv-01247-CKK Document 35 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 112–52—NOV. 9, 2011 125 STAT. 547 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 818: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–247 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Oct. 24, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–52 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to allow for prepayment of repayment contracts 

between the United States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PREPAYMENT OF CERTAIN REPAYMENT CONTRACTS 

BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE UINTAH 

WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT. 

The Secretary of the Interior shall allow for prepayment of 

the repayment contract no. 6–05–01–00143 between the United 

States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District dated June 

3, 1976, and supplemented and amended on November 1, 1985, 

and on December 30, 1992, providing for repayment of municipal 

and industrial water delivery facilities for which repayment is provided pursuant to such contract, under terms and conditions similar 

to those used in implementing section 210 of the Central Utah 

Project Completion Act (Public Law 102–575), as amended. The 

prepayment— 

(1) shall result in the United States recovering the net 

present value of all repayment streams that would have been 

payable to the United States if this Act was not in effect; 

(2) may be provided in several installments to reflect 

substantial completion of the delivery facilities being prepaid, 

and any increase in the repayment obligation resulting from 

delivery of water in addition to the water being delivered under 

this contract as of the date of enactment of this Act; 

(3) shall be adjusted to conform to a final cost allocation 

including costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation, but 

unallocated as of the date of the enactment of this Act that 

are allocable to the water delivered under this contract; 

(4) may not be adjusted on the basis of the type of prepayment financing used by the District; and 

(5) shall be made such that total repayment is made not 

later than September 30, 2022. 

Approved November 9, 2011. 

Deadline. 

Nov. 9, 2011 

[H.R. 818] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 84.51 Application of this subpart.

Subpart F applies to health, welfare, and other social service programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.

[42 FR 22677, May 4, 1977, as amended at 70 FR 24320, May 9, 2005]
§ 689.10 Appeals. ( a ) An affected individual or institution may appeal to the Director in writing within 30 days after receiving the Deputy Director's written decision. The Deputy Director's decision becomes a final administrative action if it is not appealed within the 30 day period.
( b ) The Director may appoint an uninvolved NSF officer or employee to review an appeal and make recommendations.
( c ) The Director will normally inform the appellant of a final decision within 60 days after receiving the appeal. That decision will be the final administrative action of the Foundation
#### § 73.735-703 Statutory prohibitions related to employment by a foreign government.

Employees, including officers in the Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps and retired officers of the Regular Commissioned Corps of the PHS, may not, without the consent of Congress, be employed by a foreign government or agency of a foreign government (Art. I, Sec. 9, U.S. Const.). Congress has consented to such employment by Reserve Commissioned Officers of the PHS not on active duty and by Retired Regular Commissioned Officers (37 U.S.C. 801, note) if approved under regulations of the Department of State. 22 CFR part 3a.
#### Henry Beckwith and John K. Beckwith, *Respondents, v.*James Brackett and Benjamin M. Baker, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed on report of referee.
EX-31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Harry Masuda, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Human
BioSystems;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)] for the registrant and we have:

a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;


b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c.      disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting;

5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005


/s/ Harry Masuda
------------------
Harry Masuda
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>15
§ 708.4 Applicability. The regulations in this part are to be followed when: ( a ) The Commission is owed a debt by an individual who is a current employee of the Commission; or
( b ) The Commission is owed a debt by an individual currently employed by another Federal agency; or
( c ) The Commission employs an individual who owes a debt to another Federal agency.
TS-DL13Y4 Chemical Structure

 Sanitized
#### Ward v. Spencer, appellant.

*Usury—when promissory note usurious—agreement to take usury.*

S. made two notes oí $350 each, payable at six and seven months with interest, and delivered them to R., who exchanged them with W. for W.’s notes for $640, payable at earlier dates. W. sold one of the $350 notes to plaintiff for $340. In an action on the latter by plaintiff, S. set up usury, and the judge charged the jury, that if the note was made and delivered to R. to be discounted, it had no validity in his hands, and was not an operative obligation until he transferred it to W., and the transaction was then usurious ; but if the note was delivered to R. in payment of a debt due him from S., then he had the right to sell it to W. for what he saw {it, and the transaction was not usurious. *Held,*correct. An agreement to give or take usury may be implied.

■ Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury. The action was brought by James Ward against Philander A. Spencer and another, as maker and indorser upon a promissory note.

*A. E. Killy,*for appellants.

*Francis & Pratt*and *F. W. Hullard,*for respondent.

Mullin', P. J.

The head-note sufficiently states the point passed upon in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 03, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 03, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0089. ANDREW M. VANVLERAH v. KATELYNN VANVLERAH.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18CV00305