alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-702 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and DJIBOUTI 

Signed at Washington January 24, 2003 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
DJIBOUTI 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Washington January 24, 2003; 

 Entered into force July 2, 2003.
#### § 111.25-5 [Reserved]
§ 670.4 Prohibited acts. Unless a permit has been issued pursuant to subpart C of this part or unless one of the exceptions stated in §§ 670.5 through 670.9 is applicable, it is unlawful to commit, attempt to commit, or cause to be committed any of the acts described in paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section. ( a ) *Taking of native mammal, bird, plants or invertebrates.* It is unlawful for any person to take within Antarctica a native mammal, a native bird, native plants or native invertebrates.
( b ) *Engaging in harmful interference.* It is unlawful for any person to engage in harmful interference in Antarctica of native mammals, native birds, native plants or native invertebrates.
( c ) *Entry into Antarctic specially designated areas.* It is unlawful for any person to enter or engage in activities within any Antarctic Specially Protected Area.
( d ) *Possession, sale, export, and import of native mammals, birds, plants and invertebrates.* It is unlawful for any person to receive, acquire, transport, offer for sale, sell, purchase, export, import, or have custody, control, or possession of, any native bird, native mammal, native plant or native invertebrate which the person knows, or in the exercise of due care should have known, was taken in violation of the Act.
( e ) *Introduction of non-indigenous species into Antarctica.* It is unlawful for any person to introduce into Antarctica any species which is not indigenous to Antarctica or which does not occur there naturally through migrations, as specified in subpart H of this part, except as provided in §§ 670.7 and 670.8.
( f ) *Violations of regulations.* It is unlawful for any person to violate the regulations set forth in this part.
( g ) *Violation of permit conditions.* It is unlawful for any person to violate any term or condition of any permit issued under subpart C of this part.
[63 FR 50164, Sept. 21, 1998, as amended at 86 FR 27987, May 25, 2021]
**Exhibit 99.1**




**AGGREGATE
      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**




Class
                Interest
                Principal
                Losses
                Ending
                    BalanceA1A
                2,841,549.89
                10,055,258.34
                0.00
                140,540,741.66A1B
                716,881.22
                2,513,747.82
                0.00
                35,134,252.18A2A
                4,795,083.59
                30,921,208.38
                0.00
                230,303,791.62A2B
                4,762,729.90
                0.00
                0.00
                246,644,000.00A2C
                587,808.53
                0.00
                0.00
                29,948,000.00M1
                568,481.87
                0.00
                0.00
                28,808,000.00M2
                508,111.94
                0.00
                0.00
                25,657,000.00M3
                313,124.06
                0.00
                0.00
                15,755,000.00M4
                279,791.27
                0.00
                0.00
                13,954,000.00M5
                280,775.80
                0.00
                0.00
                13,954,000.00M6
                265,429.52
                0.00
                0.00
                13,054,000.00B1
                263,851.52
                0.00
                0.00
                12,154,000.00B2
                209,217.21
                0.00
                0.00
                9,453,000.00B3
                169,684.32
                0.00
                0.00
                6,752,000.00B4
                149,097.45
                0.00
                0.00
                5,402,000.00B5
                236,038.76
                0.00
                0.00
                8,552,000.00C
                5,935,076.33
                0.00
                0.00
                20,706,042.94P
                250,571.69
                0.00
                0.00
                100.00R
                0.00
                0.00
                0.00
                0.00RX
                0.00
                0.00
                0.00
                0.00
#### § 1706.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1848 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1848

 To provide funding for the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation for 
              mortgage foreclosure mitigation activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2009

  Ms. Clarke (for herself, Mr. Miller of North Carolina, Ms. Corrine 
  Brown of Florida, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Fudge, Mr. 
  Grijalva, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Hinchey, Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
Texas, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, 
 Ms. Kilroy, Mr. McNerney, Ms. Norton, Mr. Scott of Virginia, and Mr. 
    Towns) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide funding for the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation for 
              mortgage foreclosure mitigation activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreclosure Prevention Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. HOUSING COUNSELING RESOURCES.

    There are appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year 2009, for an additional 
amount for the ``Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation--Payment to the 
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation'' $100,000,000, to remain 
available until September 30, 2010, for foreclosure mitigation 
activities under the terms and conditions contained in the second 
undesignated paragraph (beginning with the phrase ``For an additional 
amount'') under the heading ``Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation--
Payment to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation'' of Public Law 
110-161.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Richard A. Widdicombe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
      and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Date: August 15, 2005.

/s/ Richard A. Widdicombe
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
§ 79.30 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the defendant is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 79.3 and, if so, the appropriate amount of any such civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) The authority shall prove defendant's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The defendant shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
§ 108.211 Miscellaneous accommodation spaces. ( a ) Each unit must have enough facilities for personnel to wash their own clothes, including at least one tub or sink that has hot and cold running water.
( b ) Each unit must have enough equipment or space for the personnel to dry their own clothes.
( c ) Each unit must have an accommodation space that can be used for recreation.
§ 11.701 Scope of pilot endorsements. ( a ) An applicant for an endorsement as first-class pilot need not hold any other officer endorsement issued under this part.
( b ) The issuance of an endorsement as first-class pilot to an individual qualifies that individual to serve as pilot over the routes specified on the endorsement, subject to any limitations imposed under paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) The OCMI issuing an endorsement as first-class pilot imposes appropriate limitations commensurate with the experience of the applicant, with respect to class or type of vessel, tonnage, route, and waters.
( d ) A license or MMC endorsement issued for service as a master, mate, or operator of uninspected towing vessels authorizes service as a pilot under the provisions of § 15.812 of this subchapter. Therefore, first-class pilot endorsements will not be issued with tonnage limitations of 1,600 GRT or less.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8161** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. STARKS FINCHER, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 7:08

- cr - 01219

- GRA

- 1 )

Submitted : February 11, 2013 Decided: March 19, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Starks Fincher, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Starks Fincher, Jr., appeals the distr ict court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fincher , No. 7: 08

- cr - 01219

- GRA

- 1 (D.S.C. June 13, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Oscar B. Bergstrom et al., Respondents, *v.*Westminster Realty Corporation etah, Appellants.

*Bergstrom,*v. *Westminster Realty Ooipn.,*133 App. Div. 918, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted October 18, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 11, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence, that the exceptions were frivolous and presented no questions of law for review.

*John Boss Delafield*and *A. livingston Norman*for motion.

*Baúl Exigene Jones*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                            |   |                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                            |   |                         |   |
| Dated:                         March      13, 2008 | By:    | /s/ James      Parslow  |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                            |   | James      Parslow           |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                            |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                            |   |                         |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1937 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1937

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retain and redistribute 
                  certain amounts collected as fines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

  Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Hall of New York, Mr. Hinchey, and Mr. 
    Engel) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retain and redistribute 
                  certain amounts collected as fines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS.

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall retain amounts collected 
for safety-related fines, and shall distribute those amounts to 
counties for maintaining radiological emergency preparedness plans 
required in connection with the nuclear facility with respect to which 
the fines were collected.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1028]



[[Page 10233]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, P01 JE REVIEW--Reproductive 
Genomics: Mutant Models for Infertility.
    Date: March 26, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn by Marriott at Pentagon City, 550 Army Navy 
Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Rm. 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#345851474e574e4d507459555d581a5a5d5c1a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="741811070e170e0d103419151d185a1a1d1c5a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1028 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 85

#### Editorial Note:

At the request of the Department of Health and Human Services, the “Section-by-Section Analysis” portion of the preamble of the document published at 53 FR 25595, July 8, 1988, as corrected at 53 FR 26559, July 13, 1988, appears at the end of part 85.

#### §§ 85.44-85.50 [Reserved]
Mark Zickrick 421 N Huron Ave Pierre, SD 57501-2019 December20, 2014

Michael D. Gormas United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 NewJerseyAve SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Gormas: I am writing as a concerned citizen of Pierre, SD, in regards to the USDOT Order#2014-9-10 requesting Essential Air Service proposals from airline operators to serve Pierre, South Dakota. This is a letter in support ofGreat Lakes Airlines. This pastyear has been very hard on smaller airlines because ofthe tremendous loss of pilots due to the drastic change in FAA regulations concerning pilot qualifications. Great Lakes Airlines lost a huge share of its flight crew, yet has done its bestto continue to serve communities such as ours. We appreciate Great Lakes' baggage agreements and code sharing with major airlines Delta and United. Itwill be a step back in terms ofconvenience for air passengers to and from Pierre ifthey must fly an airline such as Aerodynamic, Inc., or Boutique Air. Neither ofthose airlines has a de-icing program, baggage agreements, a reservation system, ticketing agreements, or even airport rights in Denver or Minneapolis as Great Lakes does. I respectfully requestyourfair consideration ofGreat Lakes Airlines proposal. Regards, /s/ Mark Zickrick

···.. ·.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-1519

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,

v.
ANTHONY SEWARD,
Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

**ERRATA SHEET**
The opinion of this Court, and the dissenting opinion of Judge Lipez, issued together on July 28, 2020, are amended as follows:
On page 16, line, 15, replace "n.3" with "n.14."
On page 36, line 6, replace "note 3" with "note 14."
On page 38, footnote 18, replace "note 5" with "note 16."
#### § 90.16 Burden of proof.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions outlined in §§ 90.14 and 90.15 is on the recipient of Federal financial assistance.