alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND STATEMENTS OF CASH PLANS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,888
<SECURITIES>                                     8,987
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                       289
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,894
<PP&E>                                           7,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,766
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,115
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                       480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,238
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                       HEALTH SYSTEMS DESIGN CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            1997           1996           1995
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                                                     <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss..............................................................  $  (3,856,304) $  (1,207,946) $   (752,754)
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding............................      6,478,789      5,656,413     4,435,288
Common shares, options, and warrants granted (using the treasury stock
  method assuming an initial public offering price of $13.00) since
  March 16, 1995 included pursuant to Securities and Exchange
  Commission Rules....................................................       --               81,086       324,347
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding......      6,478,789      5,737,499     4,759,635
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
Net loss per common and common equivalent share.......................  $       (0.60) $       (0.21) $      (0.16)
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
                                                                        -------------  -------------  ------------
</TABLE>
# CE2009184EN.01011301.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/113 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/113

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EC and Israel to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU ***

P6_TA(2008)0036

P6_TA(2008)0036

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 February 2008 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (15061/2007 — COM(2007)0464 — C6-0445/2007 — 2007/0165(AVC))

2009/C 184 E/21

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2007)0464),

having regard to the text of the Council (15061/2007),

having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 310 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence of the EC Treaty (C6-0445/2007),

having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0025/2008),

| 1. | Gives its assent to conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its assent to conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the State of Israel. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the State of Israel.

---
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.19 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.20 Filed 07/01/14 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.21 Filed 07/01/14 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.22 Filed 07/01/14 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.23 Filed 07/01/14 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.24 Filed 07/01/14 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.25 Filed 07/01/14 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:14-cr-20382-MOB-RSW ECF No. 6, PageID.26 Filed 07/01/14 Page 8 of 8
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JULIE E. ADAMS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Rachel R. Creviston, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS

Friday, January 8, 2021

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 2

CONVENED JANUARY 3, 2021

http://www.senate.gov/ExecutiveCalendar

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

S. RES.

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED

BY

1
TREATIES

CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED

BY

2
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED

BY

3
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
* Committee of jurisdiction has requested appropriate biographical and financial information on this nominee

** Committee of jurisdiction has received the necessary biographical and financial information on this nominee; nominee will remain in this 

section for 10 session days

PRIVILEGED NOMINATIONS

MESSAGE

NO.

DATE

RECEIVED

NOMINEE AND POSITION * INFORMATION 

REQUESTED BY 

COMMITTEE

5

** REQUESTED 

INFORMATION 

RECEIVED

SENATOR REQUESTED REFERRAL TO 

COMMITTEE OF JURISDICTION 

Pursuant to S. Res. 116, 112th Congress, nominations in this section of the Executive Calendar are entitled to expedited procedures.

9 Jan 03, 2021 John M. Barger, of California, to 

be a Member of the Federal 

Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board for a term expiring 

October 11, 2022, vice David 

Avren Jones, term expired.

Yes

10 Jan 03, 2021 Christopher Bancroft Burnham, 

of Connecticut, to be a Member 

of the Federal Retirement 

Thrift Investment Board for a 

term expiring September 25, 

2024, vice Ronald David 

McCray, term expired.

Yes

11 Jan 03, 2021 Frank Dunlevy, of California, to 

be a Member of the Federal 

Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board for a term expiring 

September 25, 2022, vice 

Michael D. Kennedy, term 

expired. 

Yes
NOTICE OF INTENT TO OBJECT

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE AND OFFICE DATE AND SENATOR

6

When a notice of intent to object is given to the appropriate leader, or their designee, and such notice is submitted for inclusion in 

the Congressional Record and the Senate Executive Calendar, or following the objection to a unanimous consent to proceeding to, and, 

or disposition of, matters relating to nominations and treaties on their behalf, it shall be placed in the section of the Senate Executive 

Calendar entitled “Notice of Intent to Object”. (S. Res. 28, 112th Congress)
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

DATE SUBJECT

7

 After an action taken by the Senate, any Senator voting with the prevailing side or who has not voted may, on the same day or on 

either of the next two days of actual session thereafter, either enter a motion for reconsideration or move a reconsideration. This section 

contains such motions not yet acted on as so provided by Rule XIII, Paragraph 1.
#### § 30.35 Preservation of evidence.

The Secretary will maintain and preserve all files and records that may be needed by Justice to prove the Department's claim in court. When referring debts to Justice for litigation, certified copies of the documents that form the basis for the claim should be provided along with the CCLR. Upon its request, the original documents will be provided to Justice.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01245

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01245\01245_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01245\01245_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01245\01245_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01245\01245_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01245\01245_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01245\Certification Statement Plant ID_01245.pdf Plant certification statement

x x 01245\Supporting Documentation\01245_Arial Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01245\Supporting Documentation\01245_Arial Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 01245\Supporting Documentation\01245_Arial Map 3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01245\Supporting Documentation\01245_Dry Bottom Ash System Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01245\Supporting Documentation\01245_Part F all ponds.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01245\Supporting Documentation\01245_Water_Balance_Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Isaac Edelmuth, plaintiff and respondent, agt. Alexander McGarren, defendant and appellant.

*General*Term,

March, 1873.

A lease of a store which, by the understanding of the parties, is to be used and is used for the sale of lottery tickets, is *void.*

*Before*Daly, *Oh. J.,*Lóew *and*Poblnsou, *JJ.*

Appeal from a judgment of the first district court, entered in favor of the plaintiff on the verdict of a jury.

The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

A. H. Peavy, *for defendant and appellant.*

J. B. *Bullock,for plavntiff and respondent.*

*By the Court,*Loew, J.

The plaintiff, by an instrument in writing, leased to the defendant a store or office in West Broadway, in this city, for the term of two years and eleven months, and this action was brought by him to recover one month’s rent under that lease.

The defense interposed by the defendant was that the premises were let and hired for the purpose of vending or selling lottery policies therein.

On the trial all the testimony, by which it was sought to show that at the time when the agreement for the letting of these premises was made it was understood between the parties that they were to he used for the purpose aforesaid, was excluded by the justice, and he directed the jury to find a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. In rejecting this evidence the court below erred.

*192By the laws of this state the carrying on or conducting of a business fpr the sale of lottery tickets is unlawful, and every contract made for the purpose of aiding, assisting or furthering the same is void.

If, therefore, it was understood between the parties, at the time of making the agreement for the lease, that the store in question should be used and occupied by the defendant as a lottery office, and that, as would seem from the latter’s testimony, the plaintiff subsequently fitted the same up with the view that it should be so used and occupied, then the lease was void and the plaintiff cannot recover under it *(Updike*agt. Campbell, 4 *E. D. Smith,*570).

A party will not be permitted to come into a court of justice and invoke its aid for the purpose of enforcing a contract or agreement made and entered into by him in regard to a transaction expressly prohibited by law.

It is true the plaintiff denied that ha altered or fitted up the premises for the object indicated, but that was a question of fact for the jury to determine. The judgment should be reversed.

Daly, Oh. J., and Bobietson, J., concurred.
§ 115.402 Initial inspection for certification. ( a ) Before construction or conversion of a vessel intended for small passenger vessel service, the owner of the vessel shall submit plans, manuals, and calculations indicating the proposed arrangement, construction, and operations of the vessel, to the Marine Safety Center for approval. The plans, manuals, and calculations required to be submitted and the disposition of these plans are set forth in Part 116, Subpart B of this subchapter.
( b ) The initial inspection is conducted to determine that the vessel and its equipment comply with applicable regulations and that the vessel was built or converted in accordance with approved plans, manuals, and calculations. Additionally, during the inspection, the materials, workmanship, and condition of all parts of the vessel and its machinery and equipment may be checked to determine if the vessel is satisfactory in all respects for the service intended.
( c ) The owner or managing operator of a vessel shall ensure that the vessel complies with the laws and regulations applicable to the vessel and that the vessel is otherwise satisfactory for the intended service. The initial inspection may include an inspection of the following items: ( 1 ) The arrangement, installation, materials, and scantlings of the structure including the hull and superstructure, yards, masts, spars, rigging, sails, piping, main and auxiliary machinery, pressure vessels, steering apparatus, electrical installations, fire resistant construction materials, lifesaving appliances, fire detecting and extinguishing equipment, pollution prevention equipment, and all other equipment;
( 2 ) Arrangement and means of emergency egress;
( 3 ) Sanitary conditions and fire hazards; and
( 4 ) Certificates and operating manuals, including certificates issued by the Federal Communications Commission.
( d ) During an initial inspection for certification the owner or managing operator shall conduct all tests and make the vessel available for all applicable inspections discussed in this paragraph, and in Subpart H of this part, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the cognizant OCMI, including the following: ( 1 ) The installation of each rescue boat, liferaft, inflatable buoyant apparatus, and launching appliance as listed on its Certificate of Approval (Form CGHQ-10030).
( 2 ) The operation of each rescue boat and survival craft launching appliance required by Part 117 of this subchapter.
( 3 ) Machinery, fuel tanks, and pressure vessels required by Part 119 of this subchapter.
( 4 ) A stability test when required by § 170.175 in subchapter S of this chapter.
( 5 ) Watertight bulkheads as required by Subchapter S of this chapter.
( 6 ) Firefighting systems as required by part 118 of this subchapter.
( 7 ) The operation of all smoke and fire detecting systems, fire alarms and sensors, and fire confining appliances (such as fire screen doors and fire dampers).
### Geophysical, geochemical, and mineralogical data from the Pebble Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit area, southwest Alaska: Contributions to assessment techniques for concealed mineral resources

By: E. D. Anderson**S. M. SmithS. A. GilesMatthew Granitto**R. G. EppingerP. A. BedrosianA. K. Shah**K. D. Kelley**D. L. FeyB. J. MinsleyP. J. Brown**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds608

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geochemical data for samples collected in 2007 near the concealed pebble porphyry Cu-Au-Mo deposit, southwest Alaska(2008)                                    

                                        Geochemical data for samples collected in 2008 near the concealed pebble porphyry Cu-Au-Mo deposit, Southwest Alaska(2009)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
**Exhibit 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedOctober 15, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of IDT Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2012. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of IDT Corporation on the following Forms S-3 (File No. 333-53719, effective May 27, 1998, File No. 333-61565, effective August 14, 1998, FileNo. 333-71991, effective April 16, 1999, File No. 333-77395, effective April 29, 1999, File No. 333-80133, effective June 7, 1999, File No. 333-86261, effective August 31, 1999, File No. 333-104286,effective March 19, 2004, File No. 333-115403, effective May 12, 2004, and File No. 333-119190, effective September 22, 2004) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-73167, effective March 1, 1999, File No. 333-100424,effective October 8, 2002, File No. 333-105865, effective June 5, 2003, File No. 333-116266, effective June 8, 2004, File No. 333-130287, effective December 13, 2005, File No. 333-130288, effectiveDecember 13, 2005, File No. 333-130562, effective December 21, 2005, File No. 333-146718, effective October 15, 2007, File No. 333-154257, effective October 14, 2008 and File No. 333-177247, effectiveOctober 11, 2011).
#### Ann F. Grant, as Administratrix of the Estate of James A. Grant, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Grant*v. *Delaware, L. & W. B. B. Go.,*129 App. Div. 909, affirmed.

(Argued December 7, 1909;

decided January 4, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 30, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.

*Frederick W. Thomson*for appellant.

*William S. Haskell for*respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Dissenting: Gray and Hiscock, JJ.
§ 77.5 Remedial action procedures. Except as provided in § 77.6, the Department will use the following procedures whenever it seeks the remedial action specified in § 77.4. ( a ) *Notice.* Prior to taking remedial action, the Department will provide the recipient organization written notice of its intended action setting forth both the legal and factual reasons therefor. Notice may be provided by certified or express mail, TWX, telegram, delivery, or similar means.
( b ) *Opportunity to respond.* ( 1 ) The recipient organization has 30 days after receipt of the notice in which to submit to the Department a written statement setting forth any legal and factual reasons why it believes the proposed remedial action would be inappropriate. If no response is received by the Department within the 30-day period, the Department may make the proposed remedial action effective immediately. If a response opposing the taking of remedial action is received from the recipient organization within the 30-day period, no remedial action will be taken until a final decision has been reached under paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) The Department may prepare a written reply to the recipient organization's response. Any such reply will be forwarded to the deciding official together with the notice sent to the recipient organization and the organization's response, and a copy of the reply will be served on the recipient organization.
( c ) *Departmental decision.* The Department's decision to take remedial action under this part will be made by an official of the Department who had no involvement with the initial determination to seek remedial action. The deciding official may affirm, reverse, or modify the initial determination. In making the decision, the official will consider only the notice provided by the Department, the recipient organization's statement, the Department's reply, together with any other documents attached to them, and statements at any informal conference held pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section. The official's decision will be provided to the recipient organization in writing and will constitute the Department's final administrative action on the matter.
( d ) *Informal conference.* If, in the judgment of the official designated to make a final decision, it would materially enhance his ability to resolve the matters in dispute, he may convene an informal conference to question or hear an oral presentation by the parties. If an informal conference is convened it will be transcribed.
( e ) *Effect of decision.* The decision in a proceeding under this section affects only the recipient organization's obligations related to its letter of credit and does not determine the organization's ultimate liability with respect to improperly spent funds or other misconduct.
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Paul LeBar 6/20/2012 Concur. 

A4A Joe White email, 6/28/2013 No response. 

Other/ Additional Information: