alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.309 Crane plans and information. ( a ) Three copies of each of the following must be submitted: ( 1 ) Stress and arrangement diagrams, bill of materials, and supporting calculations for all structural components listed in API Spec. 2C, Second Edition, February 1972 (with supplement 2).
( 2 ) Drawings of foundations and substructures with supporting calculations for support and stability of each crane under its rated load.
( 3 ) Plans showing the installation of the safety features required in § 108.601.
( 4 ) Drawings of the means provided to stop motion and set brakes during a power failure. Note to § 107.309 ( a
)(4):
These plans must be submitted to the Coast Guard, if the crane is not certified. If the crane is to be certified, four copies must be sent to the American Bureau of Shipping or the International Cargo Gear Bureau, Inc.
( b ) In addition to the plans and information required in paragraph (a), the following plans and information must be submitted to the Coast Guard only: ( 1 ) One line diagrams of the electrical power circuits of the electric power crane overload protection required in Subpart 111.50 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Diagrams of the hydraulic or pneumatic power and control systems, as required by Subpart 58.30-40 or 58.30-50 of this chapter, as applicable.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by USCG-2008-0906, 73 FR 56510, Sept. 29, 2008]
UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AULEN UNAN and PATRICIA QUINTINO,

on behalf of themselves and all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

NICK LYON, in his official capacities as

DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT

OF COMMUNITY HEALTH and ACTING

DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT

OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant.

_______________________ __________/

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-13470

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 30), DENYING THE

MOTION TO INTERVENE (Doc. 18), AND HOLDING IN ABEYANCE THE MOTIONS

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 4) AND CLASS CERTIFICATION (Doc. 3)

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and

preliminary injunction, Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and on motion by Maria del

Carmen Vargas and Michigan United Health Care Access Network to intervene as

plaintiffs and class representatives. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing

held on March 5, 2015, the Court DENIES without prejudice Defendants’ motion to

dismiss, DENIES the motion to intervene, and HOLDS IN ABEYANCE the motions for

class certification and preliminary injunction. 

Furthermore, as discussed at the hearing, the parties shall agree upon and

prepare a Health Care Coverage Determination Notice that adequately informs

Medicaid applicants of the decision made on their applications. This revised notice, as

2:14-cv-13470-MOB-DRG Doc # 46 Filed 03/24/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1247
well as any technical computer updates necessary to issue the notice, must be

completed by May 7, 2015. Additionally, the parties are to appear before the Court on

May 11, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., for a status conference and, if necessary, a hearing on the

motions for preliminary injunction and class certification. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 24, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to

their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on March 24, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-13470-MOB-DRG Doc # 46 Filed 03/24/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1248
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 76294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29983]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9904-21-OW]

Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC Uncle Sam, LA

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that an exemption to the land disposal 
Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to 
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has been granted to Mosaic 
Fertilizer, LLC for two Class I injection wells located at Uncle Sam, 
LA. The company has adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the 
Environmental Protection Agency by the petition application and 
supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, 
there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection 
zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision 
allows the underground injection by Mosaic, of the specific restricted 
hazardous wastes identified in this exemption, into Class I hazardous 
waste injection wells WDW-1 and WDW-2 for 57 years from the date of the 
petition approval, unless EPA moves to terminate this exemption. 
Additional conditions included in this final decision may be reviewed 
by contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public notice 
was issued September 24, 2013. The public comment period closed on 
November 26, 2013. No comments were received. This decision constitutes 
final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This 
decision may be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative 
Procedure Act.

DATES: This action is effective as of December 4, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition and all pertinent information 
relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection Division, Source 
Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: December 4, 2013.
David F. Garcia
Deputy Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-29983 Filed 12-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 8
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 December 31, 2010
 
    
    Tdsoft Ltd. (Israel)
 
    
    Tdsoft Communications Inc. (United States)
 
    
    Tdsoft BV (Netherlands)
 
    
    VocalTec Communications, Inc. (United States)
 
    
    VocalTec Communications Hong-Kong Limited (Hong-Kong)
 
    
    VocalTec Communications Singapore PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
 
    
    YMax Corporation (United States)
 
    
    YMax Communications Corporation (United States)
 
    
    YMax Holdings Corporation (United States)
 
    
    magicJack, LP (United States)
 
    
    TigerJet Network, Inc. (United States)
 
    
    Stratus Telecommunications, LLC (United States)
 
    
    SJ Labs, Inc. (United States)
 
    
    Predictive Marketing LLC (United States)
 
    
    B Kruse and Associates, LLC (United States)
#### Francis L. Brown *v.*Augustus Heath, Pr., and Clarkville, Tr. *

Where a town voted to pay $100 to each man who had enlisted, or might enlist, as a volunteer, under the call of the President of the United States for six hundred thousand men, and instructed the selectmen to pay the same at the time of his being mustered into the service : *Held*that the town was not liable in foreign attachment as the trustee of one H. who had enlisted before the passage of such vote, but had afterwards been mustered into the service as one of the quota of the town.

Foreign Attachment. The town of Clarkville, summoned as the the trustee of Augustus Heath, the principal defendant, disclosed, that, at a town meeting duly warned, and held on the 29th day of August, 1862, for the following purposes—“first, to see if the town will vote to raise money to pay volunteers who have enlisted, or who may enlist, into the service of the United States,—second, to see how much money the town will raise to pay volunteers,—third, to transact all other business that may legally come before said meeting,—”it was voted,—‘ ‘first, to raise money to pay volunteers who have enlisted, or may enlist, under the last call of the President for six hundred thousand men; second, to pay each man one hundred dollars who has enlisted, or may enlist under said call; third, to authorize the selectmen to hire the money to pay said volunteers; fourth, that the selectmen see, or cause the money to be paid to the volunteers at the time of their being mustered into the service.” It appeared, from the disclosure, that Heath had enlisted before the town meeting, and “was one of those supposed to be entitled to said sum of one hundred dollars, when he should be mustered into the service, under the aforesaid vote that he was afterwards mustered into the service of the United States, in the 13th regiment of N. H. Volunteers, as one of the quota of Clarkville, under the aforesaid call; that no part of the sum of one hundred dollars had been paid to him, although the selectmen had borrowed the money for the purpose. The plaintiff’s writ was served upon Clarkville after Heath was thus mustered into the service of the United States.

Ramsay, for plaintiff.

Ladd, for Clarkville.

Bartlett, J.

If, under our statutes, the town had no legal right to pay a bounty to a soldier, who had already enlisted, the vote of Clark-ville was so far void, and no debt was due the principal defendant from the town. Upon the validity of the vote, however, we express no opinion. If the town had the right to vote a bounty in such case, we think: that this bounty, while still in the hands of the town and before it had been paid to Heath, cordd not be attached upon trustee process. † Opinion given by the Justices to the Governor and Council, September, 1862, *169As this latter question now arises in a suit involving the rights of individuals, we have reviewed the grounds of that opinion, and see no sufficient reason to induce us to modify the views expressed.

*The trustee must be discharged.*
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of PowerCerv
Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                           
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  April 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Marc J. Fratello                                      
|                       |  |                                                           
|                       |  | Name: Marc J. Fratello                                    
|                       |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  | (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10777-10778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Maternal-Fetal Adaptations to 
Hypoxemia.
    Date: March 29, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National

[[Page 10778]]

Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes 
of Health, 6100 Bldg. Rm. 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6889, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20424841544e414747604d41494c0e4e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="26444e475248474141664b474f4a08484f4e08414950">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 5, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1117 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Lost Link Procedures

If the AV and GCS links are lost as a result of a weak signal, or link interruption, the AV will enter into a 

“Lost Comms Logic” flight profile. When in the Lost Comms Logic the AV will return to base via its preprogrammed lost communications route. At no time will it surpass the commanded maximum altitude 

approved by the Mission Commander and set by the operator during mission planning or during an inflight update. Once it has returned to a pre-planned route for a designated time searching for a signal at 

that altitude it will navigate to its lost comms route, a predetermined route loaded prior to launch. Once 

there, it will return home. If communications are not restored, it will auto-land on a predetermined 

emergency/no-comms runway. Essentially the only failure point without some measure of redundancy 

will be the receiver and control circuit within the AV. Launch point will be decided at time of flight 

depending on wind direction and speed to provide the safest environment possible for operational 

purposes.

Should the AV lose navigational position because of a loss of or a weak GPS signal, the mission 

commander can maintain positional awareness of the AV by commanding an orbit of the aircraft around 

an object identified by video. It has ability to loiter and await re-establishment of GPS signal or arrival of 

a ground recovery team for a potential emergency landing/recovery. When practical the Operator can 

use ground reference points to guide the AV back toward a preferred recovery point (Camera Guide 

mode).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 13, 2007 (72 FR 11337) contained an incorrect address for the New Orleans East Sub-Basin scoping meeting being held on April 11, 2007. The scoping meeting will be held at the Avalon Hotel & Conference Center, 10100 I-10 Service Road, New Orleans, LA 70121.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr.Gib Owen, (504) 862-1337.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-1572 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-84-M
##### 



Exhibit No. 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
 ACT OF 2002

In connection
 with the quarterly report of barnesandnoble.com inc. (the Company) on
 Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
 and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M.
 Frain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act of 2002:



| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
 fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | By:       /s/ KEVIN M. FRAIN                                                                                              
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                           
| | Kevin M. FrainChief Financial Officer(Principal
 Accounting and Financial Officer)barnesandnoble.com inc.November 14, 2002
EXHIBIT  32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Network Installation Corporation,
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Michael  A.  Novielli,  Chairman  and  Interim  CFO of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Michael  Novielli
--------------------------------------
Michael  Novielli
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
Dated:  May  24,  2004





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

      ( print page 11060)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304. 

Mary Rupp, 

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 07-1175 Filed 3-8-07; 3:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6716
ANTONIO DEAN WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00481-WDK-FBS) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Dean Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Dean Walker appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Walker’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) civil rights action. Because Walker may resubmit his complaint as amended to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc. , 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED