alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008041EN.01000501.xml

| 15.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities

(2008/C 41/03)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities (2) are amended as follows:

1

2

On page 101, the text to heading 2309 is replaced by the following:

On page 101, the text to heading 2309 is replaced by the following:

2309

Preparations of a kind used in animal feeding

‘See Note 1 to this chapter.

For the determination of the starch content, the polarimetric method (also called modified Ewers method) laid down in point 1 of Annex I to Directive 72/199/EEC (OJ L 123, 29.5.1972, p. 6) is to be applied.

The starch content by weight of preparations of a kind used in animal feeding within the meaning of heading 2309 shall be determined by the enzymatic analytical method laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 121/2008 (OJ L 37, 12.2.2008, p. 3) in cases where the following feed materials are present in significant amounts:

| (a) | (sugar) beet products such as (sugar) beet pulp, (sugar) beet molasses, (sugar) beet pulp-molassed, (sugar) beet vinasse, (beet) sugar; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

(sugar) beet products such as (sugar) beet pulp, (sugar) beet molasses, (sugar) beet pulp-molassed, (sugar) beet vinasse, (beet) sugar;

| (b) | citrus pulp; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

citrus pulp;

| (c) | linseed; linseed expeller; linseed extracted; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

linseed; linseed expeller; linseed extracted;

| (d) | rape seed; rape seed expeller; rape seed extracted; rape seed hulls; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

rape seed; rape seed expeller; rape seed extracted; rape seed hulls;

| (e) | sunflower seed; sunflower seed extracted; sunflower seed, partially decorticated, extracted; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

sunflower seed; sunflower seed extracted; sunflower seed, partially decorticated, extracted;

| (f) | copra expeller; copra extracted; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

copra expeller; copra extracted;

| (g) | potato pulp; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

potato pulp;

| (h) | dehydrated yeast; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

dehydrated yeast;

| (i) | products rich in inulin (e.g. chips and meal of Jerusalem artichokes); |
| --- | --- |

(i)

products rich in inulin (e.g. chips and meal of Jerusalem artichokes);

| (j) | greaves. |
| --- | --- |

(j)

greaves.

Where it is not evident whether any starch is present in a preparation of a kind used in animal feeding within the meaning of heading 2309, a qualitative microscopic method may be used to verify such presence.

As regards milk products, see Additional Note 4 to this chapter. The content of milk products and the content of starch are calculated on the product as received.’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1352/2007 (OJ L 303, 21.11.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  OJ C 50, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

2

---
July 7, 2015

Mr.Michael Dill

551 Bay St.

Dunedin, FL 34698

Dear Mr. Dill:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 26th 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2476), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 301.12 Submittal of State plan for Governor's review.

The State plan must be submitted to the State Governor for his review and comments, and the State plan must provide that the Governor will be given opportunity to review State plan amendments and long-range program planning projections or other periodic reports thereon. This requirement does not apply to periodic statistical or budget and other fiscal reports. Under this requirement, the Office of the Governor will be afforded a specified period in which to review the material. Any comments made will be transmitted to the Office with the documents.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0253)

[40 FR 27147, June 26, 1975, as amended at 51 FR 37730, Oct. 24, 1986]
#### Miller v. Coates.

*Costs*— *when two bills allowed—General term—special term cannot modify order of.*

Two defendants who appeared by one attorney separately demurred to the complaint. At the special term the demurrer of one defendant was overruled ; defendant appealed and the order was affirmed with costs ; the other demurrer was sustained; plaintiff appealed and the order was reversed with costs. On an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to tax costs on each demurrer, *held,*(1) that the case was an exception to the general rule allowing but one bill of costs where several parties appear by one attorney and two bills were properly allowed; and (2) that there was no power in the special term to modify the order of the general termas to costs.

Appeal by defendants from an order at special term denying a motion for an allowance of two bills of costs.

The action was brought by Robert Miller against Andrew Coates and Berkely Mostyn. The case on appeal from orders sustaining the demurrer of one defendant, and overruling that of the other is reported, 4 N. Y. Sup. 429.

*James M. Varnum,*for appellants.

*Henry S. Bennett,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The head-note contains all that is material in the opinion.,

*Order reversed.*
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 14-20420 

v. District Judge Victoria A. Roberts 

 

AHMAD RASHID LEWIS, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE [ECF No. 55]

I. INTRODUCTION 

This matter is before the Court on Ahmad Lewis’ pro se Motion to 

Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Lewis’ motion is DENIED. 

II. BACKGROUND 

Lewis’ pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute a controlled 

substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1). 

The Court sentenced Lewis to a 60-month term of imprisonment to run 

consecutively with Case No. 16-cr-20003. Judgment was entered on 

October 26, 2017. Lewis did not appeal. 
2

III. ANALYSIS 

An unappealed federal criminal judgment becomes final ten days after it 

is entered, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 statute of limitations. 

See Sanchez-Castellano, 358 F.3d 424, 426-27 (6th Cir. 2004). Lewis’ 

conviction became final on November 6, 2017. The Antiterrorism Effective 

Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) imposes a one-year period of limitations to 

file a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which runs from the date on 

which the judgment for a criminal conviction becomes final. Accordingly, 

the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(1) expired on 

November 6, 2018, one year after the date on which Lewis’ judgment of 

conviction became final. 

Lewis did not file this motion until June 28, 2019, which is more than a 

year beyond the expiration of the statute of limitations. Thus, Lewis’ motion 

is time-barred. See Gillis v. United States, 729 F.3d 641, 643-44 (6th Cir. 

2013). 

IV. CONCLUSION 

Lewis’ motion was untimely, and the Court declines to reach its merits.

His motion to vacate is DENIED. 

 
3

 IT IS ORDERED. 

 s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

 Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: January 2, 2020
2:14-cv-12688-RHC-RSW Doc # 37 Filed 10/07/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 316
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 19, 2007, 8 a.m. to 
March 21, 2007, 10 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on March 7, 2007, 72 FR 10234-10235.
    The meeting will be held April 16, 2007 to April 18, 2007. The 
meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1446 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 108.441 Piping and discharge rates for CO2 systems.

(a) The size of branch lines to spaces protected by a CO2 system must meet Table 108.441.

(b) Distribution piping within a space must be proportioned from the supply line to give proper distribution to the outlets without throttling.

(c) The number, type, and location of discharge outlets must distribute the CO2 uniformly throughout the space.

| CO2 supply in system, kilograms (pounds) | Minimum pipe size (inches), millimeters (inches) |
| --- | --- |
| 45 (100) | 12.7 (1/2). |
| 104 (225) | 19.05 (3/4). |
| 136 (300) | 25.4 (1). |
| 272 (600) | 31.75 (11/4). |
| 450 (1,000) | 38.10 (11/2). |
| 1,110 (2,450) | 50.80 (2). |
| 1,130 (2,500) | 63.5 (21/2). |
| 2,023 (4,450) | 76.2 (3). |
| 3,229 (7,100) | 88.9 (31/2). |
| 4,750 (10,000) | 101.6 (4). |
| 6,818 (15,000) | 114.3 (41/2). |

Table 108.441—*CO*2 *System Pipe Size*

(d) The total area of all discharge outlets must be more than 35 percent and less than 85 percent of the nominal cylinder outlet area or the area of the supply pipe, whichever is smaller. The nominal cylinder outlet area in square centimeters is determined by multiplying the factor 0.0313 by the number of kilograms of CO2 required. (The nominal cylinder outlet area in square inches is determined by multiplying the factor 0.0022 by the number of pounds of CO2 required). The nominal cylinder outlet area must not be less than 71 square millimeters (0.110 square inches).

(e) A CO2 system must discharge at least 85 percent of the required amount within 2 minutes.
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 107.01 Purpose of subchapter.

This subchapter prescribes rules for the design, construction, equipment, inspection and operation of mobile offshore drilling units operating under the U.S. flag. The regulations in this subchapter (parts 107 through 109) have preemptive effect over State or local regulation within the same fields.

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48265, July 22, 2016]
#### § 111.101-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each submersible motor-driven bilge pump required on certain vessels under 46 CFR 56.50-55.

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65199, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Charles Barry, Appellant.

*People*v. *Barry,*132 App. Div. 231, affirmed.

(Argued June 14, 1909;

decided October 5, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 7, 1909, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree.

*Henry W.*Unger, *William W. Cantwell*and *K. Henry Rosenberg*for appellant.

*William Travers*Jerome, *District Attorney {E. Crosby Kmdleberger*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Chase, J.
# CE2010045EN.01010901.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/109 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/109

---

Creation of a European Training Foundation (recast) ***II

P6_TA(2008)0599

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2008 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Training Foundation (recast) (11263/4/2008 — C6-0422/2008 — 2007/0163(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/33)

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council common position (11263/4/2008 — C6-0422/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council common position (11263/4/2008 — C6-0422/2008),

| — | having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0443), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0443),

1

| — | having regard to the amended Commission proposal (COM(2007)0707), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the amended Commission proposal (COM(2007)0707),

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

| — | having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A6-0473/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A6-0473/2008),

1.   Approves the common position;

2.   Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

3.   Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

4.   Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

5.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  Texts Adopted, 22.5.2008, P6_TA(2008)0227.

1

---
§ 73.735-305 Conduct in Federal buildings. ( a ) An employee shall not participate while on Government-owned or leased property or while on duty for the Government, in any gambling activity including the operation of a gambling device, in conducting a lottery or pool, in a game for money or property, or in selling or purchasing a numbers slip or ticket.
( b ) An employee shall not while in or on Government-owned or leased property or while on duty for the Government solicit alms and contributions, engage in commercial soliciting and vending, display or distribute commercial advertisements, or collect private debts.
( c ) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not preclude: ( 1 ) Activities necessitated by an employee's law enforcement duties;
( 2 ) Participation in Federally sponsored fund-raising activities conducted pursuant to Executive Order 10927, or similar HHS-approved activities; or
( 3 ) Buying a lottery ticket at an authorized State lottery outlet for a lottery authorized by State law and conducted by an agency of a State within that State.
( d ) General Services Administration regulations on “Conduct on Federal Property” apply to all property under the control of the General Services Administration, and they are also applicable to all buildings and space under the control of this Department. These regulations prohibit, among other things, gambling, being intoxicated, and possession, distribution, or use of narcotic or dangerous drugs on the premises. The GSA regulations are found in Subpart 101-20.3 of the GSA Regulations, 41 CFR 101-20.3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics).

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on Thursday, May 10, 2007, at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), and on Friday, May 11, 2007 in the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) on technology security, combating weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological defense, transformation of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II), it has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly the meeting will be closed to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, May 10, 2007, (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Friday, May 11, 2007, (8 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.)

# ADDRESSES:

Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Defense Threat Reduction Center Building, Conference Room G, Room 1252, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, Virginia and the USD (AT&L) Conference Room (3E659), the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Eric Wright, Defense Threat Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, MS 6201, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201.                         *Phone:*                         (703) 767-5717.                    

Dated: March 5, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-1139 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
#### Rose Rehwald, *Plaintiff, v.*The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, *Defendant*.

Motion for a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
----

----

|   | (i) | the                  Report, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit,                  fully                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities                  Exchange                  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and, |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant. |
|--------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  October 18, 2006 | /s/                  Michael                  Wynhoff                          |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     | Michael                  Wynhoff                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                     | Chief                  Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                    |

----
§ 111.106-17 Piping: electrical bonding. ( a ) Tanks or piping systems that are separated from the hull structure by thermal isolation must be electrically bonded to the hull structure by a method under paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) A pipe joint or a hose connection fitting that has a gasket must be electrically bonded by a method under paragraph (c) of this section that bonds— ( 1 ) Both sides of the connection to the hull structure; or
( 2 ) Each side of the connection to the other side.
( c ) An electrical bond must be made by at least one of the following methods: ( 1 ) A metal bonding strap attached by welding or bolting;
( 2 ) Two or more bolts that give metal-to-metal contact between the bolts and the parts to be bonded; or
( 3 ) Other metal-to-metal contact between adjacent parts under designed operating conditions.