alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1)                                      The Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                                      The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 31, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/      Henry S.      Leonard                                                               |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |   | Henry      S. Leonard                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                      |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer andChief      Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                      |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ICT Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
Eracleous, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


                                            /s/  Andrew Eracleous
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Andrew Eracleous
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


January 9, 2008
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 18 2003 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. ERNEST GLENN AMBORT,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-4117 (D.C. No. 2:98-CR-197-DB)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL , KELLY , and HARTZ , Circuit Judges.

Ernest Glenn Ambort appeals the district court’s ru ling ordering appellant retained at a halfway house pending sentencing. Ap pellant was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to defraud the Unit ed States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and sixty-nine counts of aiding an d assisting in the preparation of false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7 206(2). At the verdict hearing,-2-

appellant was given a choice by the district court between returning to the halfway house to which he had been committed pendin g trial and going to jail pending sentencing, which is scheduled for July 29, 2003. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See United States v. Storey , 2 F.3d 1037, 1040 (10th Cir. 1993). “Appellate review of detention or release orders is plenary as to mixed questions of law and fact and i ndependent, with due deference to the district court’s purely factual fi ndings.” United States v. Stricklin , 932 F.2d 1353, 1355 (10th Cir. 1991). Following appellant’s conviction, 18 U.S.C. § 3143( a) requires that he “be detained” pending sentencing “unless the judicial o fficer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely t o flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if rele ased under section 3142(b) or (c).” Appellant argues that the district court imp liedly found that he was not a flight risk or a danger to the community because th e district court allowed him to choose the halfway house instead of detention in th e county jail, and complains that the district court failed to make findings in support of th e conditions imposed upon him at the halfway house. Appellant’s arguments are precluded by the doctrineof invited error. See United States v. Burson , 952 F.2d 1196, 1203 (10th Cir. 1991) (invited err or doctrine “prevents a party who induces an erroneous ruling from being able to-3-

have it set aside on appeal”). At the time the ver dict was announced, appellant specifically sought to remain at the halfway house, and did not object to the court’s granting him that request. The district co urt’s order denying appellant’s request for release pending appeal is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED BY THE COURT PER CURIAM
From: Lydia W egman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/26/2011 12:14 PM Subject: Re: Final editorial interagency comment on CO NAAQS draft



### Thanks Heidi. Does this mean this is the only other comment from the interagency review? If we make this change, should we assume the package will be cleared and we should send a clean version to you through OP? Thanks.
#### § 75.108 Inquiries.

Inquiries concerning 2 CFR part 200 may be directed to the Office of Federal Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, in Washington, DC. Inquiries concerning 45 CFR part 75 should be addressed to the HHS awarding agency, cognizant agency for indirect costs, cognizant or oversight agency for audit, or pass-through entity as appropriate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EFREM WALKER, 

Individually

Plaintiff(s),

v. Civil Case No. 14-13375

Honorable Linda V. Parker

YMK 786, LLC, 

a Michigan Limited Liability Company,

Defendant(s).

 /

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, WITH COURT’S

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT

Plaintiff and Defendant, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

hereby move to dismiss this action with prejudice, a resolution of all matters in

dispute having been made pursuant to a Settlement Agreement executed between the

parties. The parties have stipulated in their agreement that the Court retain

jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement.

Case 4:14-cv-13375-LVP-DRG ECF No. 9 filed 01/20/15 PageID.29 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANT:

M.J. STEPHEN FOX, Esq Joseph A. Sahallal, Esq

FOX & ASSOCIATES MEKANI, OROW, MEKANI, SHALLAL

& HINDO P.C.

2529 Chatham Woods Drive SE 255 South Old Woodward, Suite 310

Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Birmingham, MI 48009

Foxlawfirm@aol.com Telephone: (248) 223-9830

Facsimile: (248) 265-4107

Lawrence A. Fuller, Esq By: s/ Joseph A. Shallal 

Fuller, Fuller & Associates, P.A. Dated: January 15, 2015

12000 Biscayne Boulevard, 

Suite 502

North Miami, FL 33181

Telephone: (305) 891-5199

Facsimile: (305) 893-9505

By: s/ Lawrence A. Fuller 

Dated: January 15, 2015

Case 4:14-cv-13375-LVP-DRG ECF No. 9 filed 01/20/15 PageID.30 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EFREM WALKER, 

Individually

Plaintiff(s),

v. Civil Case No. 14-13375

Honorable Linda V. Parker

YMK 786, LLC, 

a Michigan Limited Liability Company,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER

Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, with Court’s Retention of

Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Agreement, having come before this Court,

and the Court having fully advised as to the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Stipulation is hereby

GRANTED.

S/ Linda V. Parker 

LINDA V. PARKER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 20, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to

counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, January 20, 2015, by

electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail.

S/ Richard Loury 

Case Manager

Case 4:14-cv-13375-LVP-DRG ECF No. 9 filed 01/20/15 PageID.31 Page 3 of 3
#### § 81.112 Improper conduct.

With respect to any proceeding it is improper for any interested person to attempt to sway the judgment of the reviewing authority by undertaking to bring pressure or influence to bear upon any officer having a responsibility for a decision in the proceeding, or his decisional staff. It is improper that such interested persons or any members of the Department's staff or the presiding officer give statements to communications media, by paid advertisement or otherwise, designed to influence the judgment of any officer having a responsibility for a decision in the proceeding, or his decisional staff. It is improper for any person to solicit communications to any such officer, or his decisional staff, other than proper communications by parties or amici curiae.
#### Williams v. Allen, appellant.

*Beference—when compelled—long account.*

Where only two items of an account were disputed, but it appeared that one of the items was an aggregate of smaller bills : *Held*a long account, and that a reference could be compelled. *Welsh*v. *Ha/rragh,*52 N. T. 590.

Appeal from an order of the special term directing a reference. The action was brought by Delos E. Culver against Benjamin E. Allen and others to recover the balance of account for moneys in defendants’ hands arising from the sale of securities. After the commencement of the action Washington B. Williams, the assignee in bankruptcy of Culver, was substituted as plaintiff.

*Morris & Billings*and *Michael H. Gardozo,*for appellants.

*Quiver & Bertrand,*for respondent.

Lawrence, J.

The head-note states the only point passed upon in the opinion.

*Order affirmed.*
#### § 96.33 Referral of cases to the Inspector General.

State or tribal officials who have information indicating the commission or potential commission of fraud or other offenses against the United States involving block grant funds should promptly provide the information to the appropriate Regional Office of Investigations of the Department's Office of the Inspector General.

[52 FR 37966, Oct. 13, 1987]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1546]



[[Page 14822]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Workshop to Discuss Development of a Women's Health Information 
Sharing Network

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Office of Women's Health 
is announcing the following meeting: ``Workshop to Develop a Women's 
Health Information Sharing Network'' to discuss opportunities for 
national organizations to share information about their women's health 
education activities. There will be two meetings. One will focus on 
Hispanic/Latina populations, and the other will focus on all other 
communities. Representatives of national community-based organizations 
are invited. A continental breakfast will be provided.
    Date and Time: The meetings will be held on April 12 and 13, 2007, 
from 8:30 am to 11:30 am.
    Location: The meetings will be held at AARP, 601 East St., NW., 
Washington, DC 20049.
    Contact: Susana Perry, FDA Office of Women's Health (HF-8), Food 
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 16-65, Rockville, MD 
20857, 301-827-0350, FAX: 301-827-9194, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e6d6b6d7f707f306e7b6c6c675e787a7f3076766d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4979197858a85ca948196969da4828085ca8c8c97ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Registration: There is no fee, but pre-registration is required for 
security purposes by AARP. Seating is limited to 20 participants for 
each meeting.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Susana Perry at least 7 days in advance (by April 6, 2007).

    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1546 Filed 3-27-07; 8:50 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 4.8
                                                                     -----------

                      AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SECURITY AGREEMENT

         This AMENDMENT NO. 2 (this "Amendment") is made as of April 21, 2003 by
and between SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Debtor"), and
Global Capital Funding Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Secured
Party").

         WHEREAS, Debtor and Secured Party entered into a Security Agreement
dated as of February 14, 2003, as amended (the "Security Agreement"), pursuant
to which Secured Party was granted a security interest in certain of the
Debtor's property (the "Collateral") which secures that certain Convertible
Debenture dated as of February 14, 2003, as amended, in the amended Principal
Amount of One Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,250,000) made by
Debtor and issued to Secured Party (the "Convertible Debenture"),

         WHEREAS, Debtor and Secured Party, pursuant to that certain Amendment
Number 2 to Convertible Debenture dated of even date herewith, have agreed to
increase the principal amount of the Convertible Debenture from $1,000,000 to
$1,250,000;

         WHEREAS, Debtor and Secured Party desire to amend this Security
Agreement to provide for a security interest in the Collateral to secure the
Debenture.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, Debtor and Secured Party hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Security Agreement shall be amended so that the term "Note"
shall be defined as "Note - means that certain 10% Convertible Debenture dated
as of February 14, 2003, in the amended principal amount of $1,250,000, made and
executed by Debtor and issued to Secured Party, and all amendments and
supplements thereto, restatements thereof and renewals, extensions,
restructurings and refinancings thereof."

         2. All other terms and provisions of the Security Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect and unchanged by this Amendment.

         Duly executed and delivered by the parties on the date first written
above.

                           SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC.


                           By:    /s/ Sebastian E. Cassetta
                                  -------------------------
                           Name:  Sebastian E. Cassetta
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


                           GLOBAL CAPITAL FUNDING GROUP, L.P.
                           By its General Partner, Global Capital
                           Management Services, Inc.


                           By:    /s/ Michael S. Brown
                           Name:  Michael S. Brown
                           Title: Treasurer
### From:ETCA 901 685 2261 03/19/2013 09:04 #413 P.002/003
§ 2556.745 Are VISTAs prohibited from soliciting or discouraging the political participation of certain individuals? ( a ) A VISTA may not knowingly solicit or discourage the participation in any political activity of any individual who has an application for any compensation, grant, contract, ruling, license, permit, or certificate pending before AmeriCorps or the VISTA program.
( b ) A VISTA may not knowingly solicit or discourage the participation in any political activity of any individual who is the subject of, or a participant in, an ongoing audit, investigation, or enforcement action being carried out by or through AmeriCorps or the VISTA program.
§ 116.900 Deck rails. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, rails or equivalent protection must be installed near the periphery of all decks of a vessel accessible to passengers or crew. Equivalent protection may include lifelines, wire rope, chains, and bulwarks, that provide strength and support equivalent to fixed rails. Deck rails must include a top rail with the minimum height required by this section, and lower courses or equivalent protection as required by this section.
( b ) Deck rails must be designed and constructed to withstand a point load of 91 kilograms (200 pounds) applied at any point in any direction, and a uniform load of 74 kilograms per meter (50 pounds per foot) applied to the top rail in any direction. The point and uniform loads do not need to be applied simultaneously.
( c ) Where space limitations make deck rails impractical for areas designed for crew use only, such as at narrow catwalks in way of deckhouse sides, hand grabs may be substituted.
( d ) The height of top rails required by paragraph (a) of this section must be as follows: ( 1 ) Rails on passenger decks of a ferry or a vessel engaged in excursion trips, including but not limited to sightseeing trips, dinner and party cruises, and overnight cruises, must be at least 1,000 millimeters (39.5 inches) high.
( 2 ) Rails on a vessel subject to the 1966 International Convention on Load Lines must be at least 1,000 millimeters (39.5 inches) high.
( 3 ) All other rails must be at least 910 millimeters (36 inches) high.
( e ) A sailing vessel, an open boat, or any other vessel not specifically covered elsewhere in this section, must have rails of a minimum height or equivalent protection as considered necessary by the cognizant OCMI, based on the vessel's operation, route, and seating arrangement.
( f ) Rail courses or an equivalent must be installed between a top rail required by paragraph (a) of this section and the deck so that no open space exists that is more than 305 millimeters (12 inches) high, except: ( 1 ) On passenger decks of a ferry or of a vessel on an excursion trip one of the following must be installed: ( i ) Bulwarks;
( ii ) Chain link fencing or wire mesh that has openings of not more than 100 millimeters (4 inches) in diameter; or
( iii ) Bars, slats, rail courses, or an equivalent spaced at intervals of not more than 100 millimeters (4 inches).
( 2 ) On a vessel subject to the 1966 International Convention on Load Lines, rail courses, or an equivalent, must be installed so that there is not an open space higher than 230 millimeters (9 inches) from the deck to the first rail course or equivalent.
( g ) Rails must be permanently installed except that the following rails may be removable: ( 1 ) Rails in way of embarkation stations and boarding locations; and
( 2 ) Rails on a vessel when the service of the vessel is routinely changed, as determined by the cognizant OCMI, and the required top rail height varies depending on the service of the vessel at a particular time.
EXHIBIT 11


                                                        For the Years Ended
                                                              July 31
                                                              -------
                                                       2001            2000
                                                                     Restated
                                                                    (Note 16)
                                                     -----------    ----------
Shares outstanding                                     6,954,699     5,942,903
                                                     -----------     ---------

Weighted average shares outstanding                    6,420,926     5,056,141
Stock Options                                          1,815,625     1,214,309
Warrants                                               1,797,500     1,798,125
                                                     -----------     ---------
     Total weighted average shares outstanding        10,034,051     8,068,575
                                                     ===========     =========


Net income (loss)                                   $ (1,782,224)  $(2,463,949)

Cumulative effect of change
     in accounting principle                                   -        79,896
                                                    ------------   -----------

Net income (loss)                                   $ (1,782,224) $ (2,384,053)
                                                    ============  ============

Basic Net Earnings (Loss) per share
   Net income (loss) per common share
     before change in accounting principle          $      (0.28)  $     (0.49)
   Cumulative effect of change
     in accounting principle                                   -          0.02
                                                    ------------   -----------
   Net income (loss) per common share               $      (0.28)  $     (0.47)
                                                    ============   ===========

Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) per share
   Net income (loss) per common share
     before change in accounting principal          $      (0.28)   $    (0.49)
   Cumulative effect of change
     in accounting principle                                   -          0.02
                                                    ------------    ----------
     Net income (loss) per common share             $      (0.28    $    (0.47)
                                                    ============    ==========