alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00008

- CV

In the Interest of P.S., a Child §

§

§

§ From the 97th District Court

of Archer County (2015

- 0007A

- CV)

October 27, 2016

Opinion by Justice Walker



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant (Mother) shall pay all of the costs of this

proceeding, f or which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, John
Roozendaal, state and attest that:




(1)  
I am the President and Chief Executive Officer of Scout Exploration, Inc. (the
“Company”).




(2)  
Accompanying this certification is the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, (the “Report”) as
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements.




(3)  
I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that




▪
            the
      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
      and




▪
            the
      information specified in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the period presented.




/s/
John
Roozendaal


John
Roozendaal


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 8,
2009






A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scout Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Scout Exploration,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of December 18, 2006:

A Closed Meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 at 10 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), (9)(ii), and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.

The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 19, 2006 will be: formal orders of investigation; institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; a collection matter; an adjudicatory matter; and other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 12, 2006.

Nancy M. Morris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9739  Filed 12-12-06; 3:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 155.525 Eligibility pending appeal. ( a ) *General standards.* After receipt of a valid appeal request or notice under § 155.520(d)(1)(ii) that concerns an appeal of a redetermination under § 155.330(e) or § 155.335(h), the Exchange or the Medicaid or CHIP agency, as applicable, must continue to consider the appellant eligible while the appeal is pending in accordance with standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section or as determined by the Medicaid or CHIP agency consistent with 42 CFR parts 435 and 457, as applicable.
( b ) *Implementation.* If the tax filer or appellant, as applicable, accepts eligibility pending an appeal, the Exchange must continue the appellant's eligibility for enrollment in a QHP, advance payments of the premium tax credit, and cost-sharing reductions, as applicable, in accordance with the level of eligibility immediately before the redetermination being appealed.
§ 212.3 Eligible person. In order to establish that an individual is an eligible person, it must be found that: ( a ) He is a citizen of the United States or a dependent of a citizen of the United States;
( b ) A written statement has been transmitted to the Administration by an authorized official of the Department of State containing information which identifies him as having returned, or been brought, from a foreign country to the United States because of the destitution of the citizen of the United States, or the illness of such citizen or any of his dependents, or because of war, threat of war, invasion, or similar crisis. Such statement shall, if possible, incorporate or have attached thereto, all available pertinent information concerning the individual. In case of war, threat of war, invasion, or similar crisis, a determination by the Department of State that such a condition is the general cause for the return of citizens of the United States and their dependents from a particular foreign country, and evidence that an individual has returned, or, been brought, from such country to the United States shall be considered sufficient identification of the reason for his return to, or entry into the United States; and
( c ) He is without resources immediately accessible to meet his needs.
[39 FR 26548, July 19, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 19864, Apr. 21, 1995]
§ 75.454 Memberships, subscriptions, and professional activity costs. ( a ) Costs of the non-Federal entity's membership in business, technical, and professional organizations are allowable.
( b ) Costs of the non-Federal entity's subscriptions to business, professional, and technical periodicals are allowable.
( c ) Costs of membership in any civic or community organization are allowable with prior approval by the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity.
( d ) Costs of membership in any country club or social or dining club or organization are unallowable.
( e ) Costs of membership in organizations whose primary purpose is lobbying are unallowable. See also § 75.450.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1006 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and NIGERIA 

Signed at Abuja June 30, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
NIGERIA 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Abuja June 30, 2003; 

 Entered into force October 6, 2003.
§ 286.80 What information on minimum work participation requirements must a Tribe include in its Tribal Family Assistance Plan? ( a ) To assess a Tribe's level of success in meeting its TANF work objectives, a Tribe that submits a TFAP must negotiate with the Secretary minimum work participation requirements that will apply to families that receive Tribal TANF assistance that includes an adult or minor head of household receiving such assistance.
( b ) A Tribe that submits a TFAP must include in the plan the Tribe's proposal for minimum work participation requirements, which includes the following: ( 1 ) For each fiscal year covered by the plan, the Tribe's proposed participation rate(s) for all families, for all families and two-parent families, or for one-parent families and two-parent families;
( 2 ) For each fiscal year covered by the plan, the Tribe's proposed minimum number of hours per week that adults and minor heads of household will be required to participate in work activities; ( i ) If the Tribe elects to include reasonable transportation time to and from the site of work activities in determining the hours of work participation, it must so indicate in its TFAP along with a definition of “reasonable” for purposes of this subsection, along with: ( A ) An explanation of how the economic conditions and/or resources available to the Tribe justify inclusion of transportation time in determining work participation hours; and
( B ) An explanation of how counting reasonable transportation time is consistent with the purposes of TANF;
( 3 ) The work activities that count towards these work requirements;
( 4 ) Any exemptions, limitations and special rules being established in relation to work requirements; and
( 5 ) The Tribe must provide rationale for the above, explaining how the proposed work requirements relate to and are justified based on the Tribe's needs and conditions. ( i ) The rationale must address how the proposed work requirements are consistent with the purposes of TANF and with the economic conditions and resources of the Tribe.
( ii ) Examples of the information that could be included to illustrate the Tribe's proposal include, but are not limited to: poverty, unemployment, jobless and job surplus rates; education levels of adults in the service area; availability of and/or accessibility to resources (educational facilities, transportation) to help families become employable and find employment; and employment opportunities on and near the service area.
|  |  |  | Beehives of Invention |
|--|--|--|-----------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.10 Statewide operations. The State plan shall provide that: ( a ) It will be in operation on a statewide basis in accordance with equitable standards for administration that are mandatory throughout the State;
( b ) If administered by a political subdivision of the State, the plan will be mandatory on such political subdivision;
( c ) The IV-D agency will assure that the plan is continuously in operation in all appropriate offices or agencies through: ( 1 ) Methods for informing staff of State policies, standards, procedures and instructions; and
( 2 ) Regular planned examination and evaluation of operations in local offices by regularly assigned State staff, including regular visits by such staff; and through reports, controls, or other necessary methods.
§ 400.111 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart— *Child welfare agency* means an agency licensed or approved under State law to provide child welfare services to children in the State.
*Unaccompanied minor* means a person who has not yet attained 18 years of age (or a higher age established by the State of resettlement in its child welfare plan under title IV-B of the Social Security Act for the availability of child welfare services to any other child in the State); who entered the United States unaccompanied by and not destined to ( a ) a parent or
( b ) a close nonparental adult relative who is willing and able to care for the child or
( c ) an adult with a clear and court-verifiable claim to custody of the minor; and who has no parent(s) in the United States. *Limitation:* No child may be considered by a State to be *unaccompanied* for the purpose of this part unless such child was identified by INS at the time of entry as *unaccompanied,* except that a child who was correctly classified as *unaccompanied* by a State in accordance with Action Transmittal SSA-AT-79-04 (and official interpretations thereof by the Director) prior to the effective date of this definition may continue to be so classified until such status is terminated in accordance with § 400.113(b) of this subpart; and the Director may approve the classification of a child as *unaccompanied* on the basis of information provided by a State showing that such child should have been classified as *unaccompanied* at the time of entry.
*Title IV-B plan* means a State's plan for providing child welfare services to children in the State under part B of title IV of the Social Security Act.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JUSTIN LAMBERT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2772

[March 4, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Daniel A. Casey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-7316 CF10A.

Eric T. Schwartzreich of Schwartzreich & Associates, Fort Lauderdale; 

and Sheila Zolnoor of the Law Office of Sheila Zolnoor, PA, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. ADRIAN ESPINOZA-ESTRADA, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-50061 D.C. No. 3:12-cr-01925-AJB-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 10, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: W. FLETCHER, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Adrian Espinoza-Estrada appeals his conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for attempted illegal reentry following removal. Espinoza-Estrada collaterally attacks 

# FILED
JAN 24 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 1the 1998 removal order underlying his conviction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d). We reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss the indictment. The Government does not dispute that if Espinoza-Estrada was not removable as charged in 1998, he has satisfied his burden under § 1326(d). The Government argues only that he has waived the issue. We reject the Government’s waiver argument. We have discretion to c onsider an issue not raised below when it “is purely legal, and the other party would not be prejudiced.” Engquist v. Or. Dep’t of Agric. , 478 F.3d 985, 996 n.5 (9th Cir. 2007). Although Espinoza-Estrada did not argue before the district court th at he was not removable as charged, the issue is purely legal and was clearly argue d in his opening brief. The Government had a full and fair opportunity to respond, and it has not shown any way in which it was prejudiced by Espinoza-Estrada’s failure to raise the issue below. See United States v. Saavedra-Velazquez , 578 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 2009). We agree with Espinoza-Estrada that he was not removable as charged. See United States v. Camacho-Lopez , 450 F.3d 928, 930 (9th Cir. 2006). EspinozaEstrada was removed on the basis of his 1997 conviction for misdemeanor domestic battery in violation of Calif ornia Penal Code §§ 242 and 243(e)(1). As we later held in Ortega-Mendez v. Gonzales , 450 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2006), that offense is not categorically a “crime of violence” authorizing removal under 8
2U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). Ortega-Mendez , 450 F.3d at 1016–18. EspinozaEstrada therefore was not removable on the basis of his 1997 domestic battery conviction. See Camacho-Lopez , 450 F.3d at 930. That is true regardless of the fact that we decided Ortega-Mendez after his removal proceedings. See id. at 929–30 (applying a subsequent decision to collateral review of an underlying removal proceeding); accord United States v. Cervantes-Gonzales , 238 F. App’x 278, 280 (9th Cir. 2007). REVERSED and REMANDED.

3
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.501 What IRBs must be registered?

Each IRB that is designated by an institution under an assurance of compliance approved for federalwide use by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) under § 46.103(a) and that reviews research involving human subjects conducted or supported by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must be registered with HHS. An individual authorized to act on behalf of the institution or organization operating the IRB must submit the registration information.
§ 2556.170 What nondiscrimination requirements apply to sponsors and subrecipients? ( a ) An individual with responsibility for the operation of a project that receives AmeriCorps assistance must not discriminate against a participant in, or member of the staff of, such project on the basis of the participant or staff member's race, color, national origin, sex, age, or political affiliation, or on the basis of disability, if the participant or staff member is a qualified individual with a disability.
( b ) Any AmeriCorps assistance constitutes Federal financial assistance for purposes of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d *et seq.*), title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 *et seq.*), and constitutes Federal financial assistance to an education program or activity for purposes of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*).
( c ) An individual with responsibility for the operation of a project that receives AmeriCorps assistance may not discriminate on the basis of religion against a participant in such project or a member of the staff of such project who is paid with AmeriCorps funds. This provision does not apply to the employment (with AmeriCorps assistance) of any staff member of an AmeriCorps-supported project who was employed with the organization operating the project on the date the AmeriCorps assistance was awarded.
( d ) Sponsors must notify all program participants, staff, applicants, and beneficiaries of: ( 1 ) Their rights under applicable Federal nondiscrimination laws, including relevant provisions of the national service legislation and implementing regulations; and
( 2 ) The procedure for filing a discrimination complaint. No sponsor or subrecipient, or sponsor or subrecipient employee, or individual with responsibility for the implementation or operation of a sponsor or a subrecipient, may discriminate against a VISTA on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, age, religion, or political affiliation. No sponsor or subrecipient, or sponsor or subrecipient employee, or individual with responsibility for the implementation or operation of a sponsor or a subrecipient, may discriminate against a VISTA on the basis of disability, if the VISTA is a qualified individual with a disability.
| (1)   | the                annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Pacific Syndicated Resources, Inc.                for the                year ended May 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended May 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects, the                financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Syndicated                Resources, Inc. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Darrel Woronchak                                                          |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Darrel                Woronchak                                                                    |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  August                29, 2007                                                                     |
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on John Keimedy for U.S. 

Senate, Inc. (A09-05) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on Febmary 10,2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to ^prove the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on John Kennedy for U.S. Senate, Inc. (A09-05), as 

recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the 

Audit Division dated January 4,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn n, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

/mte ' Shawn Woodhead Werth T 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission