alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.3****Rule 15d-14(a)Certification**I, Richard G. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of Phibro AnimalHealth Corporation, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q ofPhibro Animal Health Corporation;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;           b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and           c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and           b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ Richard G. Johnson       Richard G. Johnson,     Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)Date: May 15, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Federal Bank of New York, Defendant. In the Matter of the Accounting of Leo Schlesinger, as Receiver of the Federal Bank of the City of New York, Respondent. Ludwig Lehmaier, Appellant.

*People*v. *Federal Bank of New York,*133 App. Div. 800, affirmed.

(Submitted October 7, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 11, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term settling the accounts of the receiver herein.

*Maxwell G. Katz*for appellant.

*George*IP". *Glaze*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, IIaight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
§ 75.466 Scholarships and student aid costs. ( a ) Costs of scholarships, fellowships, and other programs of student aid at IHEs are allowable only when the purpose of the Federal award is to provide training to selected participants and the charge is approved by the HHS awarding agency. However, tuition remission and other forms of compensation paid as, or in lieu of, wages to students performing necessary work are allowable provided that: ( 1 ) The individual is conducting activities necessary to the Federal award;
( 2 ) Tuition remission and other support are provided in accordance with established policy of the IHE and consistently provided in a like manner to students in return for similar activities conducted under Federal awards as well as other activities; and
( 3 ) During the academic period, the student is enrolled in an advanced degree program at a non-Federal entity or affiliated institution and the activities of the student in relation to the Federal award are related to the degree program;
( 4 ) The tuition or other payments are reasonable compensation for the work performed and are conditioned explicitly upon the performance of necessary work; and
( 5 ) It is the IHE's practice to similarly compensate students under Federal awards as well as other activities.
( b ) Charges for tuition remission and other forms of compensation paid to students as, or in lieu of, salaries and wages must be subject to the reporting requirements in § 75.430, and must be treated as direct or indirect cost in accordance with the actual work being performed. Tuition remission may be charged on an average rate basis. See also § 75.431.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75727-75731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-03]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, 
(703) 601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-03 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivity of technology.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 75728]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.010


[[Page 75729]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.011


[[Page 75730]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.012


[[Page 75731]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.013

[FR Doc. 06-9744 Filed 12-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
§ 286.235 What penalties cannot be excused? ( a ) The penalties that cannot be excused are: ( 1 ) The penalty for failure to repay a Federal loan issued under section 406.
( 2 ) The penalty for failure to replace any reduction in the TFAG resulting from other penalties that have been imposed.
( b ) [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,598
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,478
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,342
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,999
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,139
<LOANS>                                         74,024
<ALLOWANCE>                                        660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,539
<DEPOSITS>                                      79,030
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,127
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 119,539
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,467
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  499
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    53
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,019
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 626
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,017
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,002
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       36
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    277
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         277
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       181
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.47
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   624
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  660
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               660
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Jade Art Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chenqing Luo,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 17, 2010





/s/
      Chenqing LuoChenqing
      Luo, Principal Financial and
                  Accounting
      Officer
1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1055

___________

Michael Pride, Sr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, *

a New York Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 5, 2001

 Filed: April 10, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Pride, an African-American male, appeals from the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment, and its denial of his motion for reconsideration,

in his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 action against his former employer, Metropolitan Life

Insurance Company (MetLife). After de novo review, see Lynn v. Deaconess Med.

Ctr.-W. Campus, 160 F.3d 484, 486 (8th Cir. 1998), we conclude the district court (1)

properly granted summary judgment for the reasons stated in its order, see Dennis v.
2–

Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 207 F.3d 523, 525 (8th Cir. 2000) (denial of leave to amend

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)); Ghane v. West, 148 F.3d 979, 981-83 (8th Cir. 1998)

(discrimination analysis); (2) did not err in striking portions of Pride’s affidavit and

exhibits,see El Deeb v. Univ. of Minn., 60 F.3d 423, 428-29 (8th Cir. 1995) (affidavits

opposing summary judgment motion shall be made on personal knowledge, set forth

such facts as would be admissible, and show affirmatively affiant is competent to

testify); and (3) did not abuse its discretion in denying Pride’s motion for

reconsideration, see Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988)

(standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We grant MetLife’s motion to

strike portions of Pride’s submission on appeal. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)


(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)





I, Lucas Schneider, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Highwater Ethanol, LLC;





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.













Date:May 21, 2014/s/ Lucas SchneiderLucas Schneider, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 641.17 Initial environmental evaluation. ( a ) *Contents.* An IEE shall contain sufficient detail to assess whether a proposed action may have more than a minor or transitory impact on the Antarctic environment, and shall include the following information: ( 1 ) A description of the proposed action, including its purpose, location, duration and intensity; and
( 2 ) Consideration of alternatives to the proposed action and any impacts that the proposed action may have on the Antarctic environment, including cumulative impacts in light of existing and known planned actions and existing information on such actions.
( b ) *Further environmental review.* If an IEE indicates that a proposed action is likely to have no more than a minor or transitory impact on the Antarctic environment, no further environmental review of the action is necessary provided that appropriate procedures, which may include monitoring, are put in place to assess and verify the impact of the action.
( c ) *Availability to public.* An annual list of IEEs and a description of any decisions taken in consequence thereof shall be provided to the Department of State for circulation to all Parties to the Protocol and to organizations or committees established pursuant to the Protocol or the Treaty, as required. The Environmental Officer, Division of Polar Programs, shall also make the list and copies of final IEEs available to the public upon request.
---

Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brad J. Peters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for GIC and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of GIC's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in GIC's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during GIC's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect GIC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. GIC's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect GIC's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in GIC's internal control over financial reporting,

|Date: June 16, 2008 | /s/    BRAD J. PETERS  
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Brad J. Peters         
|                    | Chief Financial Officer
# 2019 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 24, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130317 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JANET A. SHAW, a/k/a Stephen J. Markman, JANET S. ROSE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 130317 

 COA: 265502 

Oakland CC: 1999-621238-DM 

DOUGLAS C. SHAW,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on 

leave granted. 

p0517 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 24, 2006 

Clerk
#### Berrian v. Sanford, appellant.

*Eidenee—parol to show contents of uniting*— *Reference—receiving testimony subject to objection.*

A witness testified to the existence of a memorandum. *Held,*that oral testimony was not admissible to show the contents of such memorandum.

The reservation by a referee of the question of admissibility of testimony objected to, and receiving the testimony is probably not error, but the referee ought, before closing the case, to make his ruling and advise the parties. The practice of reserving the question disapproved in *Sharpe*v. *Freeman,*45 N. Y. 803; and condemned in *Olussman*v. *Merkel,*3 Bosw. 403.

*656Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Charles E. Berrian against Josephine E. Sanford to recover the value of a horse which plaintiff claimed defendant had agreed to deliver to him.

*Whitehead H. Van WycTc,*for appellant.'

*Hatch & Beneville,*for respondents.

Davis, P: J.

The head-note states fully the only material points passed upon in the opinion.

*New trial ordered.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

          - [Document Identifier: CMS-367] 

# ACTION:

Notice, partial retraction 

# SUMMARY:

On Friday, November 24, 2006 (71 FR 67873), the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a Notice document titled “Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request”. That notice invited public comments on three separate information collections. Through the publication of this document, CMS is retracting the portion of that notice requesting public comment on the Information Collection Requirement titled “Medicaid Drug Program Monthly Quarterly Drug Reporting Format”, form number CMS-367 (OMB # 0938-0578). 

Dated: December 12, 2006.

Michelle Shortt,

Director, Regulations Development Group, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs.

[FR Doc. 06-9786 Filed 12-15-06; 1:45 pm]

BILLING CODE 4120-01-P