43228 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 141 / Friday, July 23, 2010 / Notices 

practices in southern California, with 

detailed requirements to be determined 

during the plan preparation and 

approval process: 

• A Qualified Archaeologist shall 

contract with a Native American 

monitor to be involved with the grading 

monitoring program; 

• The Qualified Archaeologist and 

Native American monitor shall attend 

the pre-grading meeting with the 

contractors to explain and coordinate 

the requirements of the monitoring 

program; 

• During the original cutting of 

previously undisturbed deposits, the 

archaeological monitor(s) and Native 

American monitor(s) shall be onsite full 

time to perform full-time monitoring. 

Inspections will vary based on the rate 

of excavation, the materials excavated, 

and the presence and abundance of 

artifacts and features. The frequency 

and location of inspections will be 

determined by the Qualified 

Archaeologist in consultation with the 

Native American monitor. 

• Monitoring of cutting of previously 

disturbed deposits will be determined 

by the Principal Investigator. 

• In the event that previously 

unidentified potentially significant 

cultural resources are discovered, the 

archaeological monitor(s) shall have the 

authority to divert or temporarily halt 

ground disturbance operations in the 

area of discovery to allow evaluation of 

potentially significant cultural 

resources. For significant cultural 

resources, a Research Design and Data 

Recovery Program to mitigate impacts 

shall be prepared by the Principal 

Investigator and then carried out using 

professional archaeological methods. 

Before construction activities are 

allowed to resume in the affected area, 

the artifacts shall be recovered and 

features recorded using professional 

archaeological methods. The Principal 

Investigator shall determine the amount 

of material to be recovered for an 

adequate artifact sample for analysis. 

• If any human bones are discovered, 

the Principal Investigator shall contact 

the County Coroner. In the event that 

the remains are determined to be of 

Native America origin, the Most Likely 

Descendant (MLD), as identified by the 

Native American Heritage Commission, 

shall be contacted by the Principal 

Investigator in order to determine 

proper treatment and disposition of the 

remains. 

• In the event that previously 

unidentified cultural resources are 

discovered, all cultural material 

collected during the grading monitoring 

program shall be processed and curated 

at a San Diego facility that meets federal 

standards per 36 CFR part 79 and, 

therefore, would be professionally 

curated and made available to other 

archaeologists/researchers for further 

study. The collections and associated 

records shall be transferred, including 

title, to an appropriate curation facility 

within San Diego County, to be 

accompanied by payment of the fees 

necessary for permanent curation. 

Evidence shall be in the form of a letter 

from the curation facility identifying 

that archaeological materials have been 

received and that all fees have been 

paid. 

6. Traffic: Because the Proposed 

Action is part of the City of San Diego’s 

Otay Mesa Community Plan, the project 

sponsor would be responsible for 

participating in the Facilities Benefit 

Assessment (FBA) and Public Facilities 

Financing Plan (PFFP) to fund the cost 

of the community-wide road and 

intersection improvements. All 

intersections and roadways planned in 

the Otay Mesa Community Plan area are 

forecast to operate at acceptable level of 

service in the future. The City is in the 

process of updating the Community 

Plan. 

Determination 

Consistent with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 

et seq.), the regulations of the Council 

on Environmental Quality (40 CFR 

1500–1508), and the Department’s 

implementing regulations (22 CFR Part 

161, and in particular 22 CFR 161.7(c)), 

I find that issuance of a Presidential 

permit authorizing the construction, 

connection, operation, and maintenance 

of the Cross Border Facility, including 

an international pedestrian bridge, 

would not have a significant impact on 

the quality of the human environment. 

No Environmental Impact Statement 

will be prepared. A complete analysis of 

environmental impacts is contained 

within the EA, as supplemented by 

subsequent correspondence. 

Recommended 

Elizabeth Orlando, NEPA 

Coordinator, Office of 

Environmental Policy, Bureau of 

Oceans, Environment, and Science. 

Approved 

Alex Lee, Director, Office of Mexican 

Affairs, Bureau of Western 

Hemisphere Affairs. 

End text. 

Dated: July 19, 2010. 

Stewart Tuttle, 

U.S.-Mexico Border Affairs Coordinator, 

Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18118 Filed 7–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–29–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 7093] 

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; 

Lifting of Policy of Denial Regarding 

Activities of Presidential Airways, Inc. 

and its Subsidiaries/Affiliates 

Regulated Under the International 

Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 

CFR Parts 120–130) 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Department of State is lifting the 

policy of denial regarding Presidential 

Airways, Inc. and its subsidiaries/ 

affiliates imposed on December 18, 2008 

(73 FR 77099) pursuant to section 38 of 

the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22 

U.S.C. 2778) and section 126.7 of the 

International Traffic in Arms 

Regulations (ITAR). 

DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

V. Studtmann, Director, Office of 

Defense Trade Controls Compliance, 

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 

Department of State (202) 663–2980. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

126.7 of the ITAR provides that any 

application for an export license or 

other approval under the ITAR may be 

disapproved, and any license or other 

approval or exemption granted may be 

revoked, suspended, or amended 

without prior notice whenever, among 

other things, the Department of State 

believes that 22 U.S.C. 2778, any 

regulation contained in the ITAR, or the 

terms of any U.S. Government export 

authorization (including the terms of a 

manufacturing license or technical 

assistance agreement, or export 

authorization granted pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act, as amended) 

has been violated by any party to the 

export or other person having a 

significant interest in the transaction; or 

whenever the Department of State 

deems such action to be in furtherance 

of world peace, the national security or 

the foreign policy of the United States, 

or is otherwise advisable. 

On December 2, 2008, the Department 

of State placed EP Investments, LLC, 

now Xe Services LLC (a/k/a Blackwater) 

(hereafter referred to as Xe), including 

its subsidiaries or associated companies, 

under a policy of denial to ensure that 

Xe is both capable of and willing to 

comply with the AECA and ITAR. 

On April 7, 2010, AAR International, 

Inc. (AAR) acquired some of Xe’s former 

subsidiaries, including Presidential 

Airways, Inc.; Aviation Worldwide 

Services, LLC; Air Quest, Inc.; STI 

Aviation, Inc.; and EP Aviation, LLC 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 141 / Friday, July 23, 2010 / Notices 43229 

(together referred to as ‘‘Presidential’’). 

The Department of State has determined 

that AAR has taken appropriate steps to 

resolve Presidential’s alleged violations. 

AAR has improved ITAR compliance 

procedures within Presidential and has 

entered into a civil settlement with the 

Department to resolve outstanding 

alleged violations, institute external 

compliance oversight, and continue and 

improve compliance measures involving 

Presidential. 

Therefore, the Department rescinds its 

denial policy against Presidential, 

effective July 15, 2010. 

Dated: July 15, 2010. 

Andrew J. Shapiro, 

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18109 Filed 7–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

[Docket No. FHWA–2010–0090] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Notice of Request for 

Extension of Currently Approved 

Information Collection 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of request for extension 

of currently approved information 

collection. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public 

comments about our intention to request 

the Office of Management and Budget’s 

(OMB) approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We are 

required to publish this notice in the 

Federal Register by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Please submit comments by 

September 21, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by DOT Docket ID Number 

2010–0090 by any of the following 

methods: 

Web Site: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received go to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.

regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aquilla Carter, (202) 493–2906, Office of 

the Chief Financial Officer, Federal 

Highway Administration, Department of 

Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Voucher for Federal-aid 

Reimbursements. 

OMB Control Number: 2125–0507. 

Background: The Federal-aid 

Highway Program provides for the 

reimbursement to States for expenditure 

of State funds for eligible Federal-aid 

highway projects. The Voucher for Work 

Performed under Provisions of the 

Federal Aid and Federal Highway Acts 

as amended is utilized by the States to 

provide project financial data regarding 

the expenditure of State funds and to 

request progress payments from the 

FHWA. Title 23 U.S.C. 121(b) requires 

the submission of vouchers. The 

specific information required on the 

voucher is contained in 23 U.S.C. 121 

and 117. Two types of submissions are 

required by recipients. One is a progress 

voucher where the recipient enters the 

amounts claimed for each FHWA 

appropriation, and the other is a final 

voucher where project costs are 

classified by work type. An electronic 

version of the Voucher for Work 

Performed under Provisions of the 

Federal Aid Highway Acts, as amended, 

Form PR–20, is used by all recipients to 

request progress and final payments. 

Respondents: 50 State Transportation 

Departments, the District of Columbia, 

Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, 

and the Virgin Islands. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: The respondents 

electronically submit an estimated total 

of 12,900 vouchers each year. Each 

voucher requires an estimated average 

of 30 minutes to complete. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 6,450 hours. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including: (1) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the U.S. 

DOT’s performance, including whether 

the information will have practical 

utility; (2) the accuracy of the U.S. 

DOT’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed information collection; (3) 

ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, 

and clarity of the collected information; 

and (4) ways that the burden could be 

minimized, including the use of 

electronic technology, without reducing 

the quality of the collected information. 

The agency will summarize and/or 

include your comments in the request 

for OMB’s clearance of this information 

collection. 

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; 

and 49 CFR 1.48. 

Issued on: July 20, 2010. 

Judith Kane, 

Acting Chief, Management Programs and 

Analysis Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18111 Filed 7–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

[Docket No. FHWA–2010–0094] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Notice of Request for 

Extension of Currently Approved 

Information Collection 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of request for extension 

of currently approved information 

collection. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public 

comments about our intention to request 

the Office of Management and Budget’s 

(OMB) approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We are 

required to publish this notice in the 

Federal Register by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Please submit comments by 

September 21, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by DOT Docket ID Number 

2010–0094 by any of the following 

methods: 

Web Site: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received go to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES