alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MARCH 2, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 13 25 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 9- cr-0 04 46 -TW T-LTW -2 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ver su s ANGEL RUBEN RESEND IZ, D efen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Ma rch 2, 2 01 2) Befo re TJ OFLAT, ED MONDSON an d C ARNES, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Tho m as W oo ld rid ge , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Ang el Res en di z in th is di rect cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct
.13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s

th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t,
co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andRes en di z’s co nv ic ti on s an d
se nt en ces are AFFIRMED
.

2
#### § 9.2 Policy.

It is the policy of the Department of Health and Human Services in accordance with the policy of the President announced on February 21, 1969, to make research and study facilities of the Department readily available to the scientific community, especially qualified academic scientists and engineers. Unique, unusual, and expensive-to-duplicate facilities at laboratories and other study and research facilities of the Department will be made available to the national scientific community, to the maximum extent practical without serious detriment to the missions of those facilities. It is also the policy of the Department to permit qualified students and graduates of institutions of learning in the several States, and territories, as well as the District of Columbia, to use study and research facilities of the Department. When such facilities are used by academic scientists, engineers, and students, the costs incurred for the operation of the unique or unusual research facilities, as well as of the other facilities, should be funded by the operating agency responsible for the operation of that facility, except for any significant incremental costs incurred in support of research not directly related to an HHS mission.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of EnteroMedics Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg S. Lea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

March 12, 2009
#### § 681.44 Is there a right to administrative offset?

The amount of any penalty or assessment which has become final, or for which a judgment has been entered, or any amount agreed upon in a compromise or settlement, may be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, except that an administrative offset may not be made under this subsection against a refund of an overpayment of Federal taxes, then or later owing by the United States to the defendant.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul H. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
February 28, 2011

/s/ PAUL H. MCDONOUGH Paul H. McDonough Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 20, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Goodyear FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on January 31 , 2011 b etween Goodyear , DOT, and EPA and included the following individuals: Goodyear: Sim Ford, Richard Scavuzzo DOT: Li xin Zhao EPA: Jeff Cherry , Joseph Bachman, and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on sharing information re lated to the following:  Speed limited tires  Tire development process
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN:________SE01327_______________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 79.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-509, §§ 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (October 21, 1986), to be codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812, 31 U.S.C. 3809 of the statute requires each authority head to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the statute.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part ( 1 ) establishes administrative procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to authorities or to their agents, and
( 2 ) specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for such penalties and assessments.
§ 75.302 Financial management and standards for financial management systems. ( a ) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non- Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See also § 75.450.
( b ) The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following (see also §§ 75.361, 75.362, 75.363, 75.364, and 75.365): ( 1 ) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the CFDA title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the HHS awarding agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any.
( 2 ) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 75.341 and 75.342. If an HHS awarding agency requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient that maintains its records on other than an accrual basis, the recipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient may develop accrual data for its reports on the basis of an analysis of the documentation on hand. Similarly, a pass-through entity must not require a subrecipient to establish an accrual accounting system and must allow the subrecipient to develop accrual data for its reports on the basis of an analysis of the documentation on hand.
( 3 ) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation.
( 4 ) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 75.303.
( 5 ) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award.
( 6 ) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 75.305.
( 7 ) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
#### § 73.735-710 Maintenance of records.

The official responsible for the administrative aspects of these regulations (§ 73.735-202) shall make provisions for the retention and filing of requests for approval of outside work (or copies of such requests), a copy of the notification of approval or disapproval, and the annual report.
#### § 2554.7 Who investigates program fraud?

The Inspector General, or his designee, is the investigating official responsible for investigating allegations that a false claim or statement has been made. In this regard, the Inspector General has authority under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act and the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 3), as amended, to issue administrative subpoenas for the production of records and documents.
#### Garrett Neagle, as Administrator of the Estate of Garrett Neagle, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

*Neagle*v. *Syracuse, B,. & N. T. B. B. Go.,*129 App. T)iv. 936, affirmed.

(Argued January 11, 1910;

decided January 25, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 21,1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have occurred through the negligence of the defendant, his employer.

*Frank C. Sargent*for appellant.

*A. D. Jenney*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward - T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.
#### Jones *v.*The State.

Submitted July 16.

Decided August 17, 1906.

Indictment for disturbing school. Before Judge Kimsey. Ba-bun superior court. May 7, 1906.

*W. S. Paris,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Charters, solicitor-general,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. In Ms application for a continuance the movant failed to show that the same was not made for the purpose of delay; and there was no abuse of the court’s discretion in overruling the motion for continuance.

2. The portions of the charge excepted to were not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the judgment of the court refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
#### § 94.2 Applicability.

This part is applicable to each Institution that submits a proposal, or that receives, Public Health Service (PHS) research funding by means of a contract and, through the implementation of this part by the Institution, to each Investigator who is planning to participate in, or is participating in such research; provided, however, that this part does not apply to SBIR Program Phase I applications.
OMA-436325-1 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT C. MCCHESNEY, in his 

official capacity as Treasurer of Bart 

McLeay for U.S. Senate, Inc.; and BART 

MCLEAY FOR U.S. SENATE, INC,

Appellants-Plaintiffs,

v.

MATTHEW S. PETERSEN, in his 

official capacity as Chair of the Federal 

Election Commission; FEDERAL 

ELECTION COMMISSION; and 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1179

RESPONSE TO APPELLEES’

MOTIONS

Appellants Robert C. McChesney, in his official capacity as Treasurer of 

Bart McLeay for U.S. Senate, Inc.; and Bart McLeay for U.S. Senate, Inc., respond 

to the Motion to Dismiss and Excuse from Appellate Proceedings (“United States 

Motion”) filed by Appellee, United States of America (“United States”) and the 

Motion for Substitution of Appellee and Leave to File District Court Motion

(“FEC Motion”) filed by Appellee Federal Election Commission (“Commission”).

1. United States Motion. Appellants filed a notice of dismissal without 

prejudice in the district court (Appx.135). Appellants do not object to continuation 

of dismissal without prejudice of the United States during this appeal.

Appellate Case: 17-1179 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2017 Entry ID: 4508246 
OMA-436325-1 1

2. FEC Motion. Appellants do not object to this Court substituting 

Commission Chairman Steven T. Walter for former Commission Chairman 

Matthew S. Petersen as one of the appellees. Appellants also do not object to the 

district court correcting a spelling error. However, Appellants do not see a need 

for any action in the district court at this time. This Court can enter an appropriate 

order when disposing of this action. Appellants do not want the uncertainty of 

whether a new notice of appeal will be required. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).

Dated this 3

rd day of March, 2017

ROBERT C. MCCHESNEY, et al,

By: /s/L. Steven Grasz

L. Steven Grasz, Esq. (NE #19050)

Husch Blackwell LLP

13330 California Street

Suite 200

Omaha, NE 68154

Phone: 402.964.5000

steve.grasz@huschblackwell.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bartholomew L. McLeay #17746

Kutak Rock LLP

The Omaha Building

1650 Farnam Street

Omaha, NE 68102-2186

Phone: (402) 346-6000

bart.mcleay@kutakrock.com

Appellate Case: 17-1179 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2017 Entry ID: 4508246 
OMA-436325-1 1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 3, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth 

Circuit by using the CM/ECF system. I certify that all participants in the case are 

registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF 

system.

s/ L. Steven Grasz

L. Steven Grasz

Appellate Case: 17-1179 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/03/2017 Entry ID: 4508246
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1179

JAMES L. MELVIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-968-5)

Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Cortes, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James L. Melvin appeals the district court’s order

denying relief in his civil action alleging a breach of a

settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Melvin v. Principi, Sec. of Veterans

Affairs, No. CA-03-968-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 92.203 Accessibility for buildings and facilities. ( a ) No qualified individual with a disability shall, because a covered entity's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with disabilities, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any health program or activity to which this part applies.
( b ) Each facility or part of a facility in which health programs or activities are conducted that is constructed or altered by or on behalf of, or for the use of, a recipient or State Exchange must comply with the 2010 Standards if the construction or alteration was commenced on or after July 18, 2016, except that if a facility or part of a facility in which health programs or activities are conducted that is constructed or altered by or on behalf of, or for the use of, a recipient or State Exchange, was not covered by the 2010 Standards prior to July 18, 2016, such facility or part of a facility must comply with the 2010 Standards if the construction or alteration was commenced after January 18, 2018. If construction or alteration was begun on or after July 18, 2016, and on or before January 18, 2018, in conformance with UFAS, and the facility or part of the facility was not covered by the 2010 Standards prior to July 18, 2016, then it shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section and with 45 CFR 84.23(a) and (b). Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements by the use of other methods are permitted where substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the facility is provided. All newly constructed or altered buildings or facilities subject to this section must comply with the requirements for a “public building or facility” as defined in section 106.5 of the 2010 Standards.
( c ) Each facility or part of a facility in which health programs or activities under this part are conducted that is constructed or altered by or on behalf of, or for the use of, a recipient or State Exchange in conformance with the 1991 Standards at appendix D to 28 CFR part 36 or the 2010 Standards shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section and with 45 CFR 84.23(a) and (b) with respect to those facilities, if the construction or alteration was commenced before July 18, 2016. Each facility or part of a facility in which health programs or activities are conducted that is constructed or altered by or on behalf of, or for the use of, a recipient or State Exchange in conformance with UFAS shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section and with 45 CFR 84.23(a) and (b), if the construction or alteration was commenced before July 18, 2016, and such facility would not have been required to conform with a different accessibility standard under 28 CFR 35.151.
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER
SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Shankar Musunuri, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to annual report on Form 10-K of Ocugen, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: | April
        29, 2020 |                                             
|----- | ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|      |                        |                                             
|      |                        | /s/
        Shankar Musunuri                
|      |                        | Shankar
        Musunuri                    
|      |                        | Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
|      |                        | (Principal
        Executive Officer)
##### 



[JPMORGAN CHASE LOGO]
 MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association/s/ Kelly A. MathiesonKelly A. Mathieson, Managing DirectorDate: March 14, 2007




---



##### 



APPENDIX A
 Chase Mortgage Finance Trust Series 2006-A1
Chase Mortgage Finance Trust Series 2006-S1
Chase Mortgage Finance Trust Series 2006-S2
ChaseFlex Trust Series 2006-1
ChaseFlex Trust Series 2006-2




---



##### 








---



##### 



APPENDIX B
 Material Instances of Noncompliance
    Remediation Efforts
EXHIBIT 21



GENSYM CORPORATION



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                
|Gensym International Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|                                
|Gensym Securities Corporation    |  | Massachusetts                
|                                
|Gensym FSC                       |  | U.S. Virgin Islands          
|                                
|Gensym Holding Company           |  | Delaware                     
|                                
|Gensym B.V.                      |  | The Netherlands              
|                                
|Gensym GmbH                      |  | Germany                      
|                                
|Gensym S.A.                      |  | France                       
|                                
|Gensym Ltd.                      |  | United Kingdom               
|                                
|Gensym Srl.                      |  | Italy                        
|                                
|Gensym MENA                      |  | Tunisia                      
|                                
|Gensym AB                        |  | Sweden                       
|                                
|Gensym Japan Corporation         |  | Japan                        
|                                
|Gensym Asia Pacific Pte, Ltd.    |  | Singapore