alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2553.41 Who is eligible to be an RSVP volunteer? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) To be an RSVP volunteer, an individual must: ( 1 ) Be 55 years of age or older;
( 2 ) Agree to serve without compensation; and
( 3 ) Reside in or nearby the community served by RSVP.
( b ) Eligibility to serve as an RSVP volunteer shall not be restricted on the basis of formal education, experience, race, color, national origin including limited English proficiency, gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender identity or expression, political affiliation, marital or parental status, or military service.
[64 FR 14135, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64655, Dec. 17, 2018]
21st Century Holding Company

EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

      In connection with Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of
21st Century  Holding  Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Edward J. Lawson,
Chief Executive Officer of 21st Century Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of 21st Century Holding Company.


By: /s/ Edward J. Lawson
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward J. Lawson, Chief Executive Officer                       December 9, 2005
#### § 75.106 Agency implementation.

HHS is implementing the language in 2 CFR part 200 in these codified regulations.
#### James B. Rathbone, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Elmira Steel Company, Respondent, *v.*F. Wayland Ayer, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

*Bathbone*v. *Ayer,*121 App. Div. 355, reversed.

(Argued June 9, 1909;

decided October 5,1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 18, 1907, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial in an action to recover moneys alleged to have been wrongfully withdrawn from the assets of the Elmira Steel Company by defendant, a director thereof.

*David B. Hill, O. U. Kellogg*and *H. H. Rockwell*for appellant.

*Frederick Gollm*and *Edward G. Herendeen*for respondent.

Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in both courts, on dissenting opinion of Kellogg, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Chase, J.
Case 1:14-cv-00148-RJL   Document 91   Filed 03/17/21   Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 33.2**




Wells
      Fargo Bank, N.A.


Document
      Custody


1015
      10 th Avenue
      SE


Minneapolis
      MN 55414





APPENDIX
      I





Assessment
      of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria





Corporate
      Trust Services division of Wells Fargo, National Association (the “Company”) is
      responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth
      in
      Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
      Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
      applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as
      follows:





Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and
      commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for
      which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly
      issued transactions issued by an government sponsored entity (the
“Platform”).





Applicable
      Servicing Criteria: The
      servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard
      to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the
      “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). The Company has determined that all other
      servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
      Platform.





Period: Twelve
      months ended December 31, 2006 (the “Period”).





With
      respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following assessment of
      compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:





1.
            The
                Company is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the
                Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the
                Period.




2.
            The
                Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
                In
                performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
                by the
                Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122
                of
                Regulation AB.




3.
            Based
                on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
                in
                all material respects with the Applicable Servicing
                Criteria.





4.
            KPMG
                LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
                report
                with respect to the Company’s assessment
                of compliance as of and for the
                Period.








Wells
      Fargo Bank, National Association


/s/ Shari
      L Gillund_______


Shari L. Gillund


Its:
      Senior Vice President


Dated:
      March 1, 2007
#### § 400.62 Treatment of eligible secondary migrants, asylees, and Cuban/Haitian entrants.

The State and local resettlement agencies must establish procedures to ensure that eligible secondary migrant refugees, asylees, and Cuban/Haitian entrants have access to public/private RCA assistance if they wish to apply. In developing these procedures, consideration must be given to ensuring coverage of eligible secondary migrants and other eligible applicants who were sponsored by a resettlement agency which does not have a presence in the State or who were not sponsored by any agency.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1615 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1615

 To amend section 435(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 regarding 
                  the definition of economic hardship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

 Mr. Ehlers (for himself, Mr. McKeon, Ms. Granger, Mr. Wilson of South 
   Carolina, Mr. Honda, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Price of Georgia, and Mr. 
Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 435(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 regarding 
                  the definition of economic hardship.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Economic Deferment for 
Students (MEDS) Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP.

    Section 435(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1085(o)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ``or'' 
                after the semicolon;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 
                subparagraph (C); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
                following:
                    ``(B) such borrower is working full-time and has a 
                Federal educational debt burden that equals or exceeds 
                20 percent of such borrower's adjusted gross income, 
                and the difference between such borrower's adjusted 
                gross income minus such burden is less than 220 percent 
                of the greater of--
                            ``(i) the annual earnings of an individual 
                        earning the minimum wage under section 6 of the 
                        Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; or
                            ``(ii) 150 percent of the poverty line, as 
                        defined under section 673(2) of the Community 
                        Services Block Grant Act, applicable to such 
                        borrower's family size; or''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``(1)(B)'' and inserting 
        ``(1)(C)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            5,151,113
<SECURITIES>                                      5,368,446
<RECEIVABLES>                                        93,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10,701,977
<PP&E>                                              237,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (140,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10,818,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               340,518
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                463
<OTHER-SE>                                       10,478,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10,818,852
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    176,879
<CGS>                                                40,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        40,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,195,510
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  177,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,236,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,236,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (3,672,656)
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (4,909,191)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (2.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (2.92)
        


</TABLE>
#### Leopold Geisler, as Administrator of the Estate of Lizzie Butz, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*David Stevenson Brewing Company, Respondent.

*Geisler*v. *Stevenson Brewing Go.,*133 App. Div. 889, affirmed.

(Argued January 24, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *604June 28, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action for conversion.

*Edward A. Alexander*for appellant.

*Douglas Campbell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, IIaight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
§ 73a.735-103 Responsibilities. ( a ) A “control activity” employee shall be personally responsible for assuring that he does not hold an interest in any organization whose FDA-regulated activities constitute more than an insignificant part of its business as defined in § 73a.735-502(b)(2). The Associate Commissioner for Administration (or his designee) is available to assist such employees in obtaining corporate data necessary to make such a determination.
( b ) Other employees are similarly responsible for observing the financial interest retention requirements in §§ 73a.735-501(b) and 73a.735-502(a)(2).
§ 641.15 Preliminary environmental review. ( a ) The responsible official shall be notified early in the general planning process of actions proposed by USAP components that may have impacts on the Antarctic environment, so that environmental review may be integrated into the planning and decisionmaking processes. The responsible official shall conduct a preliminary environmental review of each action, including consideration of the potential direct and reasonably foreseeable indirect effects of a proposed action on the Antarctic environment.
( b ) If, on the basis of the preliminary environmental review, the responsible official determines that an action will have less than a minor or transitory impact on the Antarctic environment, he will prepare an Environmental Action Memorandum briefly summarizing the environmental issues considered and conclusions drawn from the review. No further environmental review shall be necessary.
§ 1644.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) *To disclose the cause of action* means to provide a sufficient description of the case to indicate the type r principal nature of the case.
( b ) *Recipient* means any entity receiving funds from the Corporation pursuant to a grant or contract under section 1006(a)(1)(A) of the Act.
( c ) *Attorney* means any full-time or part-time attorney employed by the recipient as a regular or contract employee.
#### § 604.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
#### § 410.1600 Purpose of this subpart.

This subpart provides guidelines for the transfer of an unaccompanied child.
Exhibit 32.1

March 17,
2008

Via
EDGAR

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of MV Oil Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

| | THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Trustee for MV Oil Trust
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:                                                              
| |                                                                  

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1854 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1854

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to modify an 
  environmental infrastructure project for Big Bear Lake, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIG BEAR LAKE, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(84) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(121 Stat. 1259) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(84) Big bear lake, california.--$9,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure improvements for Big Bear Lake, 
        California.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1854

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to modify an 
  environmental infrastructure project for Big Bear Lake, California.
```
Exhibit 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-2 |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------|

I, Richard Farrand, Chief Operating Officer of HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private Limited, (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 4.10(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I, as Depositor, HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-2, as Trust, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from August 10, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

|   | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 5th day of March 2007. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private

  Limited

 

|   | By: | /s/ Richard Farrand |
|--------|-----|---------------------|

|   | Name: | Richard Farrand |
|--------|-------|-----------------|

|   | Title: | Chief Operating Officer |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 

 ) 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 16-752 (JDB) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant, ) 

 ) NOTICE OF FILING 

F8, LLC, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Intervenor-Defendants. ) 

 ) 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S 

NOTICE OF FILING OF CERTIFIED LISTS OF CONTENTS OF THE 

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS IN MURs 6487, 6488, AND 6711 

 The Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) provides notice of the filing of the 

Commission’s Certified Lists of Contents of the Administrative Records in Matters Under 

Review (“MURs”) 6487, 6488, and 6711. See LCvR 7(n)(1). 

Date: May 12, 2017 

Respectfully submitted, 

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) 

Acting General Counsel 

lstevenson@fec.gov 

Kevin Deeley 

Associate General Counsel 

kdeeley@fec.gov 

Erin Chlopak (D.C. Bar No. 496370) 

Assistant General Counsel 

echlopak@fec.gov 

Case 1:16-cv-00752-JDB Document 28 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 2
2 

/s/ Haven G. Ward 

Haven G. Ward. (D.C. Bar No. 976090) 

hward@fec.gov 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20463 

(202) 694-1650 

Counsel for Defendant 

Federal Election Commission 

Case 1:16-cv-00752-JDB Document 28 Filed 05/12/17 Page 2 of 2
zm-20200430xex101xexport






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1





 






Exhibit 10.1
#### § 5.71 How does HHS retain FOIA records?

We will preserve records created in administering the Department's Freedom of Information program until disposition is authorized under an applicable General Records Schedule or other records schedule duly approved by the Archivist of the United States.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July 30 , 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
–2013

- 0602 FROM: Lora Strine , EPA SUBJECT: May 19 , 2015 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power

Plants

**SUMM ARY**  A phone call was held between EPA and Jonas Monast , NI on May 19 , 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

**ATTENDEES Nicholas Institute**  Jonas Monast **US EPA** Implementation Workgroup Godfrey, Janice; Strine, Lora; Boswell, Colin; Burns, Ward; Cain, Alexis; Culligan, Kevin; Dalcher, Debra; Donaldson, Guy; Drake, Robert; Dressler, Jason; Farris, Laura; Fellner, Christian; Fulton, Abby; Gonzalez, L arry; Gordon, Michael; Haber, Matt; Hackel, Angela; Hoffman, Howard; Hutson, Nick; Johnson, Mary; Johnson, Terry; Kakade, Seema; Ketcham

- Colwill, Jim; Lau, Gavin; Lawrence, Rob; Lee, Anita; Linn, Emily; Lloyd, David; McConnell, Robert; Miller, Julia; Mitch ell, Ken; Mulholland, Denise; Murray, Beth; Narvaez, Madonna; Newman, Erin; Orlando, Danny; Ortega, Kellie; Patel, Ketan; Rosenberg, Julie; Santiago, Juan; Saracino, Ray; Sherry, Christopher; Solomon, David; Srivastava, Ravi; Steib, Clovis; Stevens, Gabrie lle; Torres, Elineth; Wieber, Kirk; Williamson, Timothy; Wong, Shutsu; Zenick, Elliott; Moskal, John; Elman, Barry; Conroy, David; Greene, Cynthia; Shatas, Angie; Raymond Forde; Gardella, Anthony; Mangels, Karl; Mark, Jeremy; Victor, Meg; Daly, Carl; Aisli ng, Kathleen; Swanson, Nicholas; Wortman, Eric; Hansen, Mark; Olszewski, Joshua; Thomas, Carrie; Vijayan, Abi; Argentieri, Sabrina; Evans, DavidA; Marten, Alex; Sheriff, Glenn
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc.  (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 20th   day of November 2006.    HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC.  /s/ Pauline Schneider ----------------------- Name: Pauline Schneider Title: Chief Financial Officer