### 1 **Change an Existing AD Action** Complete if known **Directorate Identifier:** 

### 09
- NE
- 29

**Docket No:** FAA
**Originating Office Tracking No:**  **Priority Number (TAD):** (Reference QPM AIR
- ANM
- 030
- F1)
Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA

- IR

- M

- 8040.1C

. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link. **Category of A**  **D Action :**  **(Select from the following drop -**  **down list): NPRM**  **This AD will supersede**  **an existing AD action. This**  **change is the result of**  FAA error ( error in the AD ) Industry error ( error in the service information ) Other or N/A
**1. Project**  **Engineer** Name/Title/Branch: 

### Frederick Zink/ASE/ANE142 Telephone: 

### 781
- 238
- 7779 Fax : 

### 781
- 238
- 7199 Email: 

### frederick.zink@faa.gov **2. Directorate Project Officer or Backup Engineer**  (if Applicable) Name/Title/Branch: 

### Tara Fitzgerald Telephone: 

### 781
- 238
- 7130 Fax: 

### same **3. P**  **rovide one of the**  **fo llowing**  **or a tt**  **ach a Federal Register**  **version of the existing AD**  **action .**  Copy Attached AD No: 

### 2012
- 04
- 13 Docket No: 

### FAA
- 2010
- 0562 D irectorate ID: 

### 2009
- NE
- 29 **4. Design Approval Holder (DAH) Contact Information.**  ( *
- as applicable) Same as existing AD action

### 2

Name: Address: Telephone : Email * : Website*:
**5. Applicability**  (List Type Certificate (TC) Hol der’s Name/Make/Model as identified on the TCDS (insert the previous TC holder’s name if included on the TCDS). Include part number, serial number or product (i.e., aircraft, engines, propellers, or appliances), as applicable. For appliances, list DAH na me. **Double click to s earch**  **RGL fo**  **r the make/model designation.** Same as existing AD action Same as existing AD action, but a d d the following Same as existing AD action, but r emove the following

**6. Does this AD apply to a new design or design change approved as a new/amended TC/STC in**  **the past 24 months?** No TC STC ATC **7. How many products**  **(aircraft, engine, propeller, appl iance)**  **will be affected?**

Same as existing AD action Domestic Worldwide Fleet (including domestic) **8. What has happened since the issuance of the existing AD action to warrant a supersedure,**  **revisi on, or reopening of the comment period (supplemental NPRM)**  **?** 

### expand the population of affected parts **9. If**  **you are reopening the comment period (supplemental NPRM)**  **, did you disposition all**  **comments received o**  **n the NPRM**  **?** Use the Disposition Comme nts option found on the AD Worksheet Main Page. N/A (no comments received or not a supplemental NPRM) Yes (comment form submitted separately)

### 3

**10. What are your proposed actions?**  **Only complete the following table if you prop**  **ose new actions :**  Complete even if only new service information is being provided 

### No New Actions or Service Information **Service inform ation**  **(Attach a**  **clean cop**  **y*** **). What action is** 

**required? What is the initial** 

**com pliance time for**  **each a ction?**  **Is this a repetitive**

**action? If so, at what interval?**  **Is this action**

**term inating action?**  **If so, for what?** 

### Roll
- Roy ce NMSB RB.211
- 72
- AF964 Rev. 3 dated 11 Jan. 2013 expand

inspectiion of population

*Contact the directorate focal point regarding submitting se rvice information electronically 

### Additional explanation as necessary : **11. Are there any other service bulletins or prior revisions of the mandated service information**  **that we will grant credit for if previously complied with? Attach a c lean copy.**  (List previously issued service information considered acceptable, including, if applicable, any limitations, restrictions, or additions necessary.)) Same as existing AD action 

### ye s earlier versions of Roll
- Roy ce NMSB RB.211
- 72
- AF964 Rev. 3 dated 11 Jan. 2013
**12. Are there any differences between the**  **d esign**  **a pproval**  **h older’s**  **(DAH) service information**  **referenced above and this AD**  **action? If so, explain these differences and the reasons for each.** (For example, does the compliance time of this action differ from that recommended in the service info?) No **13. For a supersedure/revision,**  **list each action in the existing AD and if /how**  **it is carried over in the new**  **AD ?**  ( For example , is a specific action carried over, not carried over, or carried over only until the new AD is complied with?) 

### i nformation is carried over with the addition of the EASA MCAI 2013
- 0042 and Roll
- Roy ce NMSB RB.211
- 72
- AF964 Rev. 3 dated 11 Jan. 2013 **14. If**  **you are superseding or revising an existing AD, have AMOCs been approved for the existing AD?**  No If y es, should they continue to be considered approved ? If yes, state for what portions of this AD the previously approved AMOCs should continue to be considered approved.

### 4

**15. List any existing ADs in**  **- or affecting, the area of this AD action** 

**– that**  **overlap or conflict with this AD action and**  **could lead to a non -**  **compliance.** Consult with the Design Approval Holder (DAH) to determine whether there are any existing ADs in , or affecting, the area of this AD action that could lead to a non - compliance. Either attach the documentation received from the DAH or document who this was discussed with at the DAH, the date, and the outcome. Not Applicable Documentation Attached Not Available From DAH Date discussed: DAH Contact: Comments: **16. If**  **any requirements in the service information proposed for this AD action conflict with existing**  **AD requirements, explain how the conflicts will be addressed/resolved.** 

### No **17. Is the corrective action considered interim action?**  No I f yes, it’s interim action because .... (C heck one of the following.) DAH is developing a term inating action; not available yet. This is a Final Rule; request for comments (IAR) or an Em ergency AD that c ontains an optional terminating action; term inating action to be mandated later with a superseding NPRM. An investigation is ongoing and no term inating action developed yet. Other * Explain below

.

* Explanation: **18. I**  **s the action a Final rule; request for comments**  **or an Emergency AD? No**  If yes : Provide a brief description of the rationale for eliminating prior notice and public comment
**19. Identify affected U.S. operators**  **.** ( List only the major operators. Or identify affected aircraft as a group, e.g., “Most major U.S. airlines operate these aircraft” ) 

### none from the superscedure **20. Answ**  **er the following questions:**
No (a) Does the proposed applicability affect more than one product type (small airplane, large transport, rotorcraft, engine)? If yes, coordinate with other directorates as appropriate
. Directorate Identifier: No (b) Is this related to Suspected Unapproved Parts? (Ref. QPM AIR
- 002
- 036) If yes, coordinate as appropriate.

### 5

No ( c ) Is this action related to an NTSB or FAA Safety Recommendation? If yes, attach a copy of that recommendation and the FAA response. Recommendation Number No ( d ) Is this related to a quality control problem? If yes, coordinate with MIDO /CMO

. No ( e ) Do you have any reason to believe that this action would be considered “sensitive” ?

If yes, coordinate as appropriate. No ( f

) Is this action related to National sensitiv e security information ? ( Ref. Order 1600.75) List affected U.S. o perators Yes (g) If parts are required, are they available for all aircraft? No (h) Does this AD action affect aircraft in the presidential fleet or other military commercial aircraft derivatives? If un sure, contact the Military Certification Office (MCO), ACE

- MCO

- 100M

. **21. Will the AD prohibit installing a part before the compliance time for the related product? If**  **yes, identify any affected part(s) and part number(s).** If specific actions must be done o n spare parts before they can be installed on a product, list them here. This is commonly referred to as the disposition of spare parts. No
**22. Does this AD affect only PMA parts?**  Is this AD being written against the PMA parts only and not the corresponding parts for which they are approved replacements? Not Applicable **23. Can a PMA part be excluded from the AD action? If so, specify PMA**  **holder and P/N.** If you are aware of specific PMA parts that do not exhibit this unsafe condition, select Y es. Otherwise select N

o. Not Applicable

**24. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.23, a special flight permit will be**  **:** Permitted without limitations Limitations: **25. Is there is a reporting requi**  **rement in this action, and if so, who should receive the information?** (List ACO or DAH name and contact information)

. **Also, if you are deviating from the standard reporting time, provide a reason for doing so.**  Reporting requirement? No Explanation: **26. FOR TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT ONLY:**  Is the unsafe condition related to fuel tank ignition? No If yes:

### 6

(a ) Were the actions identified as part of a formal SFAR 88
- related mandatory action decision meeting (SFAR 88 Review ) meeting ? ( b ) Were the actions identified by means other than the formal SFAR 88 review (i.e., Post SFAR 88)? **27. FOR TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT ONLY:**  Is the unsafe condition related to widespread fatigue damage (WFD) (i.e., mu ltiple site damage or multiple element damage) or establishing a limit of validity (LOV) of the engineering data supports the structural maintenance program? No If yes: (Check only one box) (a ) T he actions were identifi ed as part of the WFD evaluation (i.e., § 26.21 or § 25.571 ) and/or identified in the design approval holder’s binding schedule
. ( b ) T he actions were identified by means other than the formal WFD evaluation (e.g., in
service finding ). (c) T 

### he actions were identified as part of an aging airplane program (reference AC 120
- 104, paragraph 103) and are necessary to support an airplane reaching its L OV but are not identif

ied as actions related to WFD.
**28. Provide any informati**  **on that you**  **think is needed to draft the AD action that was not requested**  **above .**  P otential AMOCs, etc. 

### None of the new population are in the U.S. use the same verbage of old AD, add the new revision of the SB and add it to credit for previo use action as well old identifier is 2009
- NE
- 29 cost will be adjusted based on information from the OEM that 61 effected engines may come to the US for re
- inspection

### 7 **Regulatory Evaluation**
Docket No. FAA
- 

### 2010
- 05 62 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2009
- NE
- 29

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** Action ( e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work
- hours (include access, testing, and close
- up) Labor

cost (@$85/h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Numbe r of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet 

### inspection NMSB 72
- AF964 20.0 $ 1,700.0 0 $ 1,700.00 

### 432 $ 734,400.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 734,400 Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ **On -**  **Condition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work
- hours

(include access, testing, and close
up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product
$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 **Special considera tions for Economic Analysis**  (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) : 

### ASE estimate from OEM added to the existing numbers from the superceded AD

### 8

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO * Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO * Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the A D have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include sp ecific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO 

### * Explanation 

### :

### 9 **Record of Discussion**  Docket No. FAA
- Directorate Identifier:
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,**  **manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### EASA Omiros Kastanis 2/28/13 Concur. 

### RRplc Johnson Richard 2/28/13 , 3/5 Concur. 

### ATA Joe White 2/28/13 No response.

Other/Additional Information:

### 10 **Signature Section** Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No. : **ASE Date** 

**COS Focal** ( optional ) **Date**

**Branch Manager Date** 

**AEG Representative** (except for appliances) **Date**

**MIDO/ CMO/**  **MIO Representative** ***** **Date** *Signature required if a QC problem is involved.

**EIR NUMBER (MIDO/ CMO/**  **MIO use only)**

**ACO/Staff Office Manager Date**