alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1713 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1713

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
              LABORATORY, LANE, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The South Central Agricultural Research 
Laboratory of the Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and redesignated as the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research 
Laboratory''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the South Central 
Agricultural Research Laboratory shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research Laboratory''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WES WATKINS POST OFFICE, BENNINGTON, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 310 North Perry Street in Bennington, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Wes Watkins Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wes 
Watkins Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the ) A11 -11 

North Dakota Republican Party ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on February 03,2014, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve die Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

North Dakota Republican Party, as reconunended in the Memorandum from the 

Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated January 28,2014 

subject to the edit on page 7 by the Office of Commissioner Weintraub. 

Conmiissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

/Bbte* Shawn Woodhead Werth / 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
§ 287.60 Are there additional financial reporting and auditing requirements? ( a ) The reporting of expenditures are generally subject to the requirements of 45 CFR 75.341.
( b ) NEW Program funds and activities are subject to the audit requirement of the Single Audit Act of 1984 (45 CFR part 75, subpart F).
( c ) A NEW Program grantee must comply with all laws, regulations, and Departmental policies that govern submission of financial reports by recipients of Federal grants.
( d ) Improper expenditure claims under this program are subject to disallowance.
( e ) If a grantee disagrees with the Agency's decision to disallow funds, the grantee may follow the appeal procedures at 45 CFR part 16.
[65 FR 8554, Feb. 18, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016]
##### 



Exhibit No. 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of barnesandnoble.com inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin
M. Frain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. By:
    /s/ Kevin M. FrainKevin M. FrainChief Financial Officer and
Vice President, Operations
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
barnesandnoble.com inc.May 10, 2004 NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 25
#### § 2522.330 [Reserved]
#### § 75.113 Mandatory disclosures.

The non-Federal entity or applicant for a Federal award must disclose, in a timely manner, in writing to the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the Federal award. Non-Federal entities that have received a Federal award including the term and condition outlined in Appendix XII are required to report certain civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings to SAM. Failure to make required disclosures can result in any of the remedies described in § 75.371, including suspension or debarment. (See also 2 CFR parts 180 and 376, and 31 U.S.C. 3321).

[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3014, Jan. 20, 2016]
Density Measurement:

1. The empty vial weight was measured.

2. The pic acid powder was poured inside the vial and the vial was tapped a few times on a table top to make sure there were no large voids present. The weight was recorded.

3. The vial was emptied and filled with equal volume of water. The water volume was measured.

4. The bulk density was measured by wt/volume.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12623-12624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Chronic Kidney Disease 
in Pediatric HIV-Infection.
    Date: April 6, 2007.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator,

[[Page 12624]]

Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 755, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7799, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d49da7e7ecbbae94babdbcfab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="11586222297e6b517f78793f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 8, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1226 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### A. E. Tunberg, appellee, v. Charles R. Courtney, appellant.

Filed September 26, 1914.

No. 17,786.

Appeal: Conflicting Evidence. A verdict on conflicting evidence, approved by tbe trial court, will not be set aside on appeal unless clearly wrong.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. George A. Day, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Garl E. Herring*and *F. H. Woodland,*for appellant.

*H. G. Brome*and *D. L. Johnson, contra.*

Fawcett, J.

From a judgment of the district court for Douglas county, upon a promissory note, defendant appeals.

The defense pleaded and relied upon in the court below was no consideration. The case was exhaustively tried by able counsel on both sides. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The case must stand or fall now, and if it were reversed for another trial would again have to stand or fall, upon the question of the credibility of the witnesses. There is a substantial conflict in the evidence on the material issue in the case. In the argument at the bar we were impressed with the idea that the judgment might have to be reversed; but upon a careful examination of the record we find ourselves unable to enter such an order, although we concede that even now we entertain some doubt about the correctness of the verdict. Under our well-settled rules, we cannot permit mere doubt in our minds to weigh as against the fact that the trial court and jury saw the witnesses upon the stand and heard them testify. They were better able to determine the question of credibility. We must yield our doubts, based upon the cold record, to their judgment, based upon a hearing of *751the testimony as it was given in court and an observance of the witnesses while giving it.

It is incidentally urged in the briefs that the court erred in the admission of certain testimony. It would serve no good purpose to set it out here. While the rulings were close to the border line, we do not think the court committed prejudicial error in receiving it.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
#### Collins, plaintiff in error, v. People.

*Bigamy—venue—conviction in wrong county.*

In a trial for bigamy the proof showed that the second marriage took place in Tates county, and that the prisoner was apprehended in that county. *Held,*that a conviction in Oswego county was erroneous (2 R. S. 688, § 10).

Error to review conviction of John W. Collins, in the Oswego county sessions, upon an indictment of bigamy. The material facts appear in the opinion.

*Wrn. Tiffany*and *W. G. Robinson,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. J. Lamoree,*district attorney, for the people.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted, tried and convicted of bigamy in the court of sessions of Oswego county.

The proof showed that the second marriage took place in Tates county and that the prisoner was apprehended in that county. By statute (2 E. S. 688, § 10 [3 E. S. 5th ed. 968]) it is provided that for a second or other marriage the person committing such offense may be tried in any county in which such person may be apprehended.

The prisoner’s counsel moved that he be discharged, because the offense was not committed in Oswego county, nor the prisoner apprehended in such county. The court denied the motion and refused to discharge the prisoner. This was error. He could not lawfully be tried in Oswego county. *Halse*v. *People,*46 Barb. 34.

The conviction must be reversed and the prisoner discharged.

*Conviction reversed.*
**B -**  **3 Contractors, Inc. --**  **Post Office Box 142 Klaw**  **ock, A K 99925**  **907 -**  **755 -** **2375 Fax: 907**  **- 755**  **- 2361**  **-- Cell: 907**  **- 401**  **- 0375** 

**b3con@aptalaska.net**

February 8, 2013 Lauralyn J. Remo DOT, Office of Aviation Analysis , Air Carrier Fitness Division, X

- 56 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Wa shington, D.C. 20590 USA Ms. Remo, We write this letter in support of the application by Island Air Express for a Certificate of Public Convenience that would grant them authority to transport mail for the City of Klawock , Alaska on Prince of W ales Island. We have lived in Klawock and operated our business from here since 1986. During that time we have had many altered travel plans due to weather. W e have waited long periods of time for needed repair parts to arrive in the mail for our equipment. We have experienced delays in closing business deals waiting for mail delivery, sometimes for as long as a week. Since the inception of service to our island community by Island Air Express , we have been able to count on travel plans. We can get to our destinations in as little time as possible because of the availability and timing of flights from Klawock to the Ketchikan Airport. Most appreciated is our ability to now get back home to Kla wock in the same day because of Island Air’s flight schedules and more importantly, their ability to fly in most weather conditions because of their IFR service. Island Air Express is the only scheduled carrier flying into Klawock from Ketchikan, from wh ich location our mail and freight is transported. We have waited for over a week at times for mail that is in a “holding pattern ” somewhere because of weather. This winter season , as with all others before it, mail is constantly delayed and there is no reliable schedule for one’s daily trip to the post office to pick it up. W e are confident that Island Air Express can provide a much more reliable mail delivery service to all of us in Klawock, and beyond, if approved to do so. The facility that Island Ai r has constructed at the Klawock Airport to house their operations, and to secure their planes, is appreciated by all of us. It clearlydemonstrates their commitment to a high level of reliable service to its customers and to

their comfort and safety. Island Air Express has proven itself time and again as a great supporter of Prince of Wa les Island activities. W ith a Klawock based staff, they also contribute greatly to the local economy. The service provided to us by Island Air Express, as business ow ners and private citizens, has been impeccable. The staff is professional, courteous, friendly and they all bend over backwards to serve our needs. We look forward to the day when Island Air Express can also provide us with more reliable mail service. Respectfully submitted, Michael J. Bush Janice M. Bush Owners, B

- 3 Contractors, Inc.
#### § 410.1004 ORR custody of unaccompanied children.

All unaccompanied children placed by ORR in care provider facilities remain in the legal custody of ORR and may be transferred or released only with ORR approval; provided, however, that in the event of an emergency, a care provider facility may transfer temporary physical custody of an unaccompanied child prior to securing approval from ORR but shall notify ORR of the transfer as soon as is practicable thereafter, and in all cases within 8 hours.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company to Acquire a Crossing of the Buffalo, New York and Lake Erie Railroad Company and the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad Company in the City of Buffalo and Two Other Cases.

Order in each case affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
§ 286.100 What activities count towards the work participation rate? ( a ) Activities that count toward a Tribe's participation rate may include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Unsubsidized employment;
( 2 ) Subsidized private sector employment;
( 3 ) Subsidized public sector employment;
( 4 ) Work experience;
( 5 ) On-the-job training (OJT);
( 6 ) Job search and job readiness assistance; (see § 286.105)
( 7 ) Community service programs;
( 8 ) Vocational educational training; (see § 286.105)
( 9 ) Job skills training directly related to employment;
( 10 ) Education directly related to employment, in the case of a recipient who has not received a high school diploma or a certificate of high school equivalency;
( 11 ) Satisfactory attendance at secondary school or in a course of study leading to a certificate of general equivalence, if a recipient has not completed secondary school or received such a certificate;
( 12 ) Providing child care services to an individual who is participating in a community service program; and
( 13 ) Other activities that will help families achieve self-sufficiency.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### Pietro Benveg-na, Respondent, *v.*United Surety Company, Appellant.

*Bemegna*v. *United Surety Co.,*132 App. Div. 925, affirmed.

(Argued October 5, 1909;

decided November 23, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 14, 1909, which' reversed a judgment *of*
      *564Special Term overruling a demurrer to the answer and dismissing the complaint in an action to recover upon a surety bond.

The following question was certified: *“*Does the plaintiff's complaint set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*Edwin Bhmenstiel*for appellant.

*Nelson L. Keach*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with *costs;*question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in case of *Musco*v. *United Surety Co.*(196 N. Y. 459).

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann. Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
§ 672.13 Accelerated decision; decision to dismiss. ( a ) *General.* The Presiding Officer, upon motion of any party or sua sponte, may at any time render an accelerated decision in favor of the complainant or the respondent as to all or any part of the proceeding, without further hearing or upon such limited additional evidence, such as affidavits, as he may require, if no genuine issue of material fact exists and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law regarding all or any part of the proceeding. In addition, the Presiding Officer, upon motion of the respondent, may at any time dismiss an action without further hearing or upon such limited additional evidence as he requires, if complainant fails to establish a prima facie case, or if other grounds show complainant has no right to relief.
( b ) *Effect.* ( 1 ) If an accelerated decision or a decision to dismiss is issued as to all the issues and claims in the proceeding, the decision constitutes an initial decision of the Presiding Officer, and shall be filed with the Hearing Clerk.
( 2 ) If an accelerated decision or a decision to dismiss is rendered on less than all issues or claims in the proceeding, the Presiding Officer shall determine what material facts exist without substantial controversy and what material facts remain controverted in good faith. He shall then issue an interlocutory order specifying the facts which appear substantially uncontroverted, and the issues and claims upon which the hearing will proceed.
Honorable Cecil Fruett Opinion No. C-666 

County Attorney 

Hutchinson County Re: Whether Article 23.04 

Borger, Texas of the 1966 Code of 

Criminal Procedure authorizes county clerks 

to issue "caplas" to persons other than the 

Dear Elr. Pruett: sheriff. 

By your recent letter you requested an opinion of this 

office as to whether the oounty clerk has authority to issue 

a capias to persons other than the sheriff in misdemeanor 

cas.88. 

The ig66 Code of Criminal Procedure defines the caplas 

inArticle 23.01, as follows: 

"A *capiasj Is a writ issued by the 

court or clerk, and directed 'To any peace 

officer of the State of Texas', commanding him 

to arrest a person accused of an offense and 

bring him before that court immedlatelx, ;or on 

a day or at a term stated in the writ. 

The capias in misdemeanor cases is mentioned in Article 

23.04 which reads as follows: 

"In misdemeanor cases the caplas or summons 

shall issue from a court having jurisdlotlon of the 

case. The summons shall be issued only upon request of the attorney representing the State and 

shall follow the same form and procedure as in a 

felony case." 

Article 23.04 provides directions for the issuance of a summons, 

but does not provide directions for the issuance of a capias, 

The only d,irectlons for the issuance of a capias under the 1966 

Code of Criminal Procedure are found in Article 23.01, heretofore quoted. Such Article clearly provides for the issuance 

of a capias to any peace officer of the State of Texas. 

-3214- 
- - 

Honorable Cecil Pruett, page 2 (C-666 ) 

Therefore, It is the opinion of this office that Article 23.01 of the 1966 Code of Criminal Procedure governs the 

issuance of a oaplis under Artiole 23.04 and the court or the 

clerk is authorized $0 lssu? the oapias In a 

ananiireot the same to any peace officer of 

. 

SlJMMAHy 

tiedemeanor case 

the State of 

The county clerk, in misdemeanor oauea, 

has authority to issue a oaplas to any peace 

officer of the State of Texas. 

Yours very truly, 

WApoONER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMXTTE3 

W. 0. Shultx, Chairman 

Ralph Rash 

Phllllp Crawford 

Howard M. Fender 

Sam Kelley 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

By: T. B. Wright 

Assistan; Attorney General 

-3215-