alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                        EX-32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flexible Solutions International,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Dan O'Brien, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company
and Fred Kupel, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do
each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 12, 2005        /s/DAN O'BRIEN
                             ---------------------
                             Dan O'Brien
                             President, Director and Principal Executive Officer

Date: August 12, 2005        /s/FRED KUPEL
                             ---------------------
                             Fred Kupel
                             Principal Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Flexible Solutions International, Inc. and will be retained by
Flexible Solutions International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
























                                    Page 15
Exhibit 4.1


 





 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


June 9, 2020


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2016


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2016 (the
“Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-237209 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby
authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 		Alex R. Meitzner
	 		Senior Vice President
1

Icenhour, Melissa K.

From: Jerry Davis [JDavis@lsb-okc.com]

Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 8:58 AM

To: Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: Icenhour, Melissa K.; Neulicht, Roy

Subject: RE: NSPS Nitric Acid - Monitoring Question

Bill,

Good to hear from you. My thoughts on the points you raise follow:

Opacity: I do not feel opacity is of any value when we are achieving low NOx levels. The 

analyzer monitoring NOx is all that makes sense. If industry is meeting the PPM limits, 

there will be no opacity.

Air monitoring: I am not sure what the consideration/ justification/ environmental benefit 

for monitoring air flow (I assume to the reactor) would be. During startup an shutdown, we 

have air flow when we are not burning ammonia. Any correlation to emissions from air flow 

may not be correct. It should not be a problem for any company as all companies monitor this 

flow for operational reasons. I would need more information on your justification/ thinking 

to give you any thoughts that could help.

Regards,

Jerry

-----Original Message-----

From: Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:14 AM

To: Jerry Davis

Cc: Icenhour, Melissa K.; Neulicht, Roy

Subject: NSPS Nitric Acid - Monitoring Question

Jerry,

 Hope you are doing well.

 We are considering adding to this NSPS a monitoring requirement to continually 

monitor air flow rate. We are also thinking of deleting the requirement for opacity 

monitors.

 Any thoughts?

 Thanks

Bill Neuffer

Metals and Minerals Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (D 243-02) US Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone - 919-541-5435

Fax - 919 - 541-3207

E-mail - neuffer.bill@epa.gov

Office Location: 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC (D 231C)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243-02

109 TW Alexander Drive
2

RTP, NC 27709
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2015

No. 04-15-00128-CR

IN RE Eduardo TREVINO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On May 6, 2015, relator Eduardo Trevino filed a motion to object asking this court to 

reconsider its order of April 22, 2015, which denied relator’s motion to modify the trial court’s 

order. The court has considered relator’s request to reconsider and it is DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on May 14, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 1999CR4085, 1999CR6204, and 1999CR6205, each styled The State of 

Texas v. Eduardo Trevino, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Lorina I. Rummel

presiding.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 74451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9664]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 74451]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-4 of November 22, 
                2006

                
Presidential Determination on Waiving Prohibition 
                on United States Military Assistance With Respect to 
                Comoros and Saint Kitts and Nevis

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 
                2007 of the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 
                2002 (the ``Act''), title II of Public Law 107-206 (22 
                U.S.C. 7421 et seq.), I hereby:

                <bullet> Determine that Comoros and Saint Kitts and 
                Nevis have each entered into an agreement with the 
                United States pursuant to Article 98 of the Rome 
                Statute preventing the International Criminal Court 
                from proceeding against U.S. personnel present in such 
                countries; and

                <bullet> Waive the prohibition of section 2007(a) of 
                the Act with respect to these countries for as long as 
                such agreements remain in force.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress, and to arrange for its 
                publications in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, November 22, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-9664
Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of
World Energy Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James Parslow, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:
      March 3, 2009
              By:
              /s/ James
      ParslowJames
      ParslowChief
      Financial Officer






A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 51.3 Who is eligible to apply?

Sponsors which had alien physicians in their exchange visitor programs on January 10, 1978, are eligible to apply. For purposes of this regulation, the term “program” relates to a graduate medical education program having an exchange visitor program for physicians participating in graduate medical education or training. An “exchange visitor program” is a program of a sponsor, designed to promote interchange of persons, knowledge and skills, and the interchange of developments in the field of education, the arts and sciences, and is concerned with one or more categories of participants to promote mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries.
§ 75.103 Authorities. This part is issued under the following authorities. ( a ) Subpart B of this part through subpart D of this part are authorized under 31 U.S.C. 503 (the Chief Financial Officers Act, Functions of the Deputy Director for Management), 31 U.S.C. 1111 (Improving Economy and Efficiency of the United States Government), 41 U.S.C. 1101-1131 (the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act), Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970, and Executive Order 11541 Prescribing the Duties of the Office of Management and Budget and the Domestic Policy Council in the Executive Office of the President, the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507), as well as The Federal Program Information Act (Public Law 95-220 and Public Law 98-169, as amended, codified at 31 U.S.C. 6101-6106).
( b ) Subpart E of this part is authorized under the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended; the Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950, as amended (31 U.S.C. 1101-1125); the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (31 U.S.C. 503-504); Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970; and Executive Order No. 11541 Prescribing the Duties of the Office of Management and Budget and the Domestic Policy Council in the Executive Office of the President.
( c ) Subpart F of this part is authorized under the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507).
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3014, Jan. 20, 2016]
§ 680.10 Definitions; cross-references to employee ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations. ( a ) *Definitions.* Under this subpart, unless a provision plainly indicates otherwise: ( 1 ) *Award* means any grant, contract, cooperative agreement, loan, or other arrangement made by the Government.
( 2 ) *Employee* includes, in addition to any individual defined in 5 CFR 2635.102(h), any individual working at NSF under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act. It includes any part-time or intermittent employee, temporary consultant; but not a special Government employee, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a).
( 3 ) *Institution* means any university, college, business firm, research institute, professional society, or other organization. It includes all parts of a university or college, including all institutions in a multi-institution State or city system. It includes any university consortium or joint corporation; but not the universities that belong to such a consortium. Those universities shall be considered separate institutions for purposes of this part.
( 4 ) *Proposal* means an application for an award and includes a bid.
( b ) *Cross-references to employee ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations.* Members of the National Science Board and other employees of the National Science Foundation (NSF), including special Government employees, should refer to the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, the National Science Foundation's regulations at 5 CFR part 5301 which supplement the executive branch Standards, and the executive branch financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634.
#### § 613.1 General provisions.

This part sets forth the National Science Foundation procedures under the Privacy Act of 1974. The rules in this part apply to all records in systems of records maintained by NSF that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. They describe the procedures by which individuals, as defined in the Privacy Act, may request access to records about themselves and request amendment or correction of those records. All Privacy Act requests for access to records are also processed under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 (as provided in part 612 of this chapter), which gives requesters the benefit of both statutes. Notice of systems of records maintained by the National Science Foundation are published in the Federal Register. This part also includes regulations required by the Social Security Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 to limit the use of Social Security numbers on documents mailed by the National Science Foundation (NSF or Foundation).

[70 FR 43068, July 26, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 64169, Oct. 24, 2022]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**BIOSOLAR,
      INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Biosolar, Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Lee, Chief
      Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Biosolar, Inc and will be retained by Biosolar, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
                David
                LeeDavid
                LeeChief
                Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                March 19, 2007
§ 81.105 Oral argument to the reviewing authority. ( a ) If any party desires to argue a case orally on exceptions or replies to exceptions to an initial or recommended decision, he shall make such request in writing. The reviewing authority may grant or deny such requests in its discretion. If granted, it will serve notice of oral argument on all parties. The notice will set forth the order of presentation, the amount of time allotted, and the time and place for argument. The names of persons who will argue should be filed with the Department hearing clerk not later than 7 days before the date set for oral argument.
( b ) The purpose of oral argument is to emphasize and clarify the written argument in the briefs. Reading at length from the brief or other texts is not favored. Participants should confine their arguments to points of controlling importance and to points upon which exceptions have been filed. Consolidations of appearances at oral argument by parties taking the same side will permit the parties' interests to be presented more effectively in the time allotted.
( c ) Pamphlets, charts, and other written material may be presented at oral argument only if such material is limited to facts already in the record and is served on all parties and filed with the Department hearing clerk at least 7 days before the argument.
srpt-ex101_25.htm



Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) previously adopted and approved the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20 of the Plan, the “Administrator” (defined under the Plan as the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) or any of its committees) may amend the Plan from time to time subject to Company stockholder approval; and

WHEREAS, the Board, as Administrator, has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan to increase the number of authorized shares under the Plan by 3,800,000 shares of common stock of the Company, as authorized under the Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting on June 4, 2020, the Plan hereby is amended, effective April 3, 2020, the date of approval by the Board, as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Section 3(a) of the Plan, entitled “Stock Subject to Plan,” shall be replaced in its entirety by the following:




“(a) Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 15(a) of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be subject to Awards and sold under the Plan is 8,187,596 Shares, which reflects (i) 3,800,000 new Shares subject to the First Amendment to the Plan; (ii) 2,900,000 Shares approved by stockholders on June 6, 2018; and (iii) 1,487,596 Shares, which was the maximum number of Shares available under the Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) as of April 11, 2018, plus the number of Shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2011 Plan that expire or otherwise terminate without having been exercised in full, or are forfeited to or repurchased by us, up to a maximum of 2,412,466 Shares; provided, however, that such aggregate number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by 1.41 shares for each Share delivered in settlement of any Full Value Award and, provided further, that no more than 6,700,000 Shares may be issued upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.”

Except as modified herein, the Plan is hereby specifically ratified and affirmed.

Approved by the Board on April 3, 2020.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00112-CV

Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

v.

Winford A. Matthew, Earl B. Matthew, Roberta M. Wiedeman, Trustee of Robert 

Matthew Wiedeman Living Trust, et al.

On Appeal from the

135th District Court of De Witt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-04-24,131

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, vacates the trial court’s orders and judgment and dismisses the case. The 

Court VACATES the following orders and judgment: (1) January 9, 2018 Order on 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and for Discovery Abuse Sanctions; (2) September 26, 

2018 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Partial Summary Judgment; (3) September 26, 2018 

Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) February 14, 2019 

Final Judgment. The case is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

the appellant, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 5, 2019
From: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US

To: SHARDY@mountainland.org

Date: 12/29/2009 10:08 AM Subject: Fw: EPA-R08-OAR-2006-0013: FRL-9087-5

Ms. Hardy:

We are in receipt of your request that EPA extend t he public comment period on the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2009 related to Utah PM10 submittals.

We received a number of requests to extend the comm ent period.

We intend to publish a notice in the Federal Regist er by the end of this year to extend the comment period until March 1, 2010.

Thank you.

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief Air Quality Planning Unit Air Program (8P-AR) U.S. EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 phone (303) 312-6936 fax (303) 312-6064

From: "SUSAN HARDY" <SHARDY@mountainland.org>

To: Callie Videtich/P2/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Steven Call" <steven.call@fhwa.dot.gov>, "ANDREW J ACKSON" <AJACKSON@mountainland.org>, "Ahmad Jaber" <ajaber@ utah.gov>, "Bryce Bird" <bbird@utah.gov>, "Bill Reiss" <breiss@utah.gov>, " Elden Bingham" <eldenbingham@utah.gov>, "Kip Billings" <kbillings@wfrc.org>

Date: 12/15/2009 09:19 AM Subject: EPA-R08-OAR-2006-0013: FRL-9087-5

Callie Videtich Director Air Program, EPA Region 8

Dear Callie,

Mountainland AOG, the MPO for the Utah County non a ttainment areas intends to submit comments to the above disapproval proposal of the Utah County PM10 Maintenance plan.

Due to the extensive amount of supporting data that needs to be collected and the Holiday period we are heading int o, we would like to respectfully request an extension to the comment pe riod from Dec. 31st to February 28th.

This issue is very important to us as a transportat ion planningorganization and has great impact on our operations

.

We hope EPA region 8, would respond positively to t his extension
request.

Respectfully

Susan Hardy

Susan E. Hardy Architect/Urban Planner

Air Quality Program Manager

Mountainland Association of Governments

586 east 800 north Orem, Utah 84097- 4146

Phone - (801) 229-3842 Fax - (801) 229-3801

email: shardy@mountainland.org
§ 73b.5 Hearings. ( a ) Hearings shall be stenographically recorded and transcribed and the testimony of witnesses shall be taken under oath or affirmation. Hearings will be closed unless an open hearing is requested by the respondent, except that if classified information or protected information of third parties is likely to be adduced at the hearing, it will remain closed. If either party to the proceeding fails to appear at the hearing, after due notice thereof has been sent to him/her, he/she shall be deemed to have waived the right to a hearing and the administrative law judge may make a decision on the basis of the record before him/her at that time.
( b ) The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity are not controlling in hearings under this part. However, the administrative law judge shall exclude evidence which is irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious.
( c ) Depositions for use at a hearing may, with the consent of the parties in writing or the written approval of the administrative law judge be taken by either the Assistant General Counsel or the respondent or their duly authorized representatives. Depositions may be taken upon oral or written interrogatories. There shall be at least 10 days written notice to the other party. The requirement of a 10-day written notice may be waived by the parties in writing. When a deposition is taken upon written interrogatories, any cross-examination shall be upon written interrogatories. Copies of such written interrogatories shall be served upon the other party with the notice, and copies of any written cross-interrogation shall be mailed or delivered to the opposing party at least 5 days before the date of taking the depositions, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. Expenses in the reporting of depositions shall be borne by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.