alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1525 

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to consider reconstruction and improvement of flood protection systems when establishing 

flood insurance rates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Ms. MATSUI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to 

require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency to consider reconstruction and improvement of flood protection systems when establishing 

flood insurance rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1525 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF RECONSTRUCTION AND 

2 IMPROVEMENT OF FLOOD PROTECTION SYS3 TEMS IN DETERMINATION OF FLOOD INSUR4 ANCE RATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1307 of the National 

6 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4014) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in subsection (e)— 

9 (A) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘con10 struction of a flood protection system’’ and in11 serting ‘‘construction, reconstruction, or im12 provement of a flood protection system (without 

13 respect to the level of Federal investment or 

14 participation)’’; and 

15 (B) in the second sentence— 

16 (i) by striking ‘‘construction of a flood 

17 protection system’’ and inserting ‘‘con18 struction, reconstruction, or improvement 

19 of a flood protection system’’; and 

20 (ii) by inserting ‘‘based on the present 

21 value of the completed system’’ after ‘‘has 

22 been expended’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (f)— 

24 (A) in the first sentence in the matter pre25 ceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘(without reVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:16 Mar 17, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1525.IH H1525

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1525 IH

1 spect to the level of Federal investment or par2 ticipation)’’ after ‘‘no longer does’’; 

3 (B) in the third sentence in the matter 

4 preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, wheth5 er coastal or riverine,’’ after ‘‘special flood haz6 ard’’; and 

7 (C) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘a Fed8 eral agency in consultation with the local 

9 project sponsor’’ and inserting ‘‘the entity or 

10 entities that own, operate, maintain, or repair 

11 such system’’. 

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

14 the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall promul15 gate regulations to carry out the amendments made by 

16 subsection (a). 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
July 5, 1961

Honorable R. E.Gray County Attorney **San** Saba County - San Saba. Texas Opinion No. WW-1082 Re: Use ofbond proceeds.

Dear Mr. Gray:

you request an opinion based on the following facts: In a 19.38election in San Saba County the issue was whether or not thevoters favored the authorization of a $138,000.00 bond issue under the terms of Section 52, Article III, Constitution of Texas, andActs 39th Legislature (1926), 1st Called Session, Ch. 16.

In all phases of the election proceedings specific projects were named and a definite sum of the proceeds of the proposed bond issuewas allotted each. The purpose and use of themoney, dollar for dollar, was predetermined by the Commissioners' Court in the event thevoters authorized the issuance of thebonds.

Thevoters sustained the proposition by the necessary two-thirds (2/3)majority. Thebonds were issued as "San Saba County, Texas, Road Bonds, Series 1938," $138,- 000.00. The one voted proposition pertinent here read:

"To assist in constructing a newbridge across the Colorado River atNorthwest, Ten Thousand Dollars ($lO,OOO.OO)" We are advised that thisbridge has never been built and there is no bridge of any nature at that site..

Honorable R. E. Gray, page 2 (WW-1082)

you inform us that all of thebonds in the 1938 Series have been retired and request an opinion as to the disposition of the $lO,OOO.OO.

It is fundamental that proceeds from the sale of bonds canbe legally expended only for the purpose forwhich theywere voted.

Gordon v. Commissioners' Court ofJefferson Countv, 310 S.W.Zd 761 (Civ.App.1958, error ref. n.r.e.1; Lewis v. City of FortWorth, 126 Tex. 458, 89 S.W.2d 975 (1936); Gillham v. Citv ofDallas, 207 S.W.Zd 978 (Civ. App. 1948, error ref. n.r.e.); Wright v. Allen, 257 S.W. 980 (Civ.App. 1924, error'ref.); Black v. Strenqth, 112 Tex. 188, 246 S-W.79 (1922): **Moore** v. Coffman, 109 Tex. 93, '200S.W. 374 (1918). Consequently, your first question, whether the money can be spent on general road improvements in a cer~~ tain precinct, is answered in the negative.

your second question is: "Ifnot, iiiwhich fund shall themoney be placed?" Thebonds were voted under the provisions ofActs 39th Leg., 1st C.S., Ch. 16, p. 23. Section 12 thereof treats of thensale of-such~bonds and provides: ~.~~ .

*. . .the purchase money therefor shall be placed in the county treasury of such county to the credit of the available road fund . . .*I ,- In this case themoney~may be,ljlacedin the available road fundbut itmay be expended only aspdirected in thevoted proposition.Honorable R. E.Gray, page 3 (WW-1082)

**SUMMARY** Bond proceeds cannot be legally diverted **from** the purpose for which theywere voted.

Very trulyyours,

GW-s APPROVED: OPINION COM?UTTEE: W. V. Geppert, Chairman Joe Osborn Arthur Sandlin Linward Shivers WILL WILSON

Reviewed for theAttorney **General** By: Morgan Nesbitt
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the "Company")
  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Douglas
  Biles, Chief Executive Officer and I, Terry Mereniuk, Chief Financial Officer
  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                              
| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.

|Dated: May 11, 2006 | /s/ Douglas Biles   | 
|------------------- | ------------------- | 
|                    | Douglas Biles, CEO  | 
|                    |                     | 
|                    |                     | 
|                    | /s/ Terry Mereniuk  | 
|                    | Terry Mereniuk, CFO | 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1595 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1595

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, as the ``Brian K. Schramm 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIAN K. SCHRAMM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brian K. 
Schramm Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1595

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, as the ``Brian K. Schramm 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
§ 411.41 Assessment for risk of sexual victimization and abusiveness. ( a ) Within 72 hours of a UC's arrival at a care provider facility and periodically throughout a UC's stay, the care provider facility must obtain and use information about each UC's personal history and behavior using a standardized screening instrument to reduce the risk of sexual abuse or sexual harassment by or upon a UC.
( b ) The care provider facility must consider, at a minimum and to the extent that the information is available, the following criteria to assess UCs for risk of sexual victimization: ( 1 ) Prior sexual victimization or abusiveness;
( 2 ) Any gender nonconforming appearance or manner or Self-identification as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, or intersex and whether the resident may therefore be vulnerable to sexual abuse or sexual harassment;
( 3 ) Any current charges and offense history;
( 4 ) Age;
( 5 ) Any mental, physical, or developmental disability or illness;
( 6 ) Level of emotional and cognitive development;
( 7 ) Physical size and stature;
( 8 ) The UC's own perception of vulnerability; and
( 9 ) Any other specific information about an individual UC that may indicate heightened needs for supervision, additional safety precautions, or separation from certain other UCs.
( c ) This information must be ascertained through conversations with the UC during the intake process and medical and mental health screenings; during classification assessments; and by reviewing court records, case files, care provider facility behavioral records, and other relevant documentation from the UC's files. Only trained staff are permitted to talk with UCs to gather information about their sexual orientation or gender identity, prior sexual victimization, history of engaging in sexual abuse, mental health status, and mental disabilities for the purposes of the assessment required under paragraph (a) of this section. Care provider facilities must provide UCs an opportunity to discuss any safety concerns or sensitive issues privately.
( d ) The care provider facility must implement appropriate controls on the dissemination within the care provider facility of responses to questions asked pursuant to this standard in order to ensure that sensitive information is not exploited to the UC's detriment by staff or other UCs.
____________ 

------------------------------

USCA Case #22-5140 Document #1963908 Filed: 09/14/2022 Page 1 of 2 

United States Court of Appeals 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 

No. 22-5140 September Term, 2022 

1:21-cv-00406-TJK 

Filed On: September 14, 2022 

Campaign Legal Center, 

Appellee 

v. 

Federal Election Commission, 

Appellee 

Heritage Action for America, 

Appellant 

Consolidated with 22-5167 

BEFORE: Millett, Rao, and Childs, Circuit Judges 

O R D E R 

Upon consideration of the motion to hold in abeyance, the opposition thereto, 

and the reply; and the motion for summary affirmance and dismissal, the opposition 

thereto, and the reply, it is 

ORDERED that the motion to hold in abeyance be denied without prejudice to a 

determination by the merits panel that abeyance is warranted. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied in No. 

22-5167 as to the district court’s denial of intervention. The merits of the parties’ 

positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, 

Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss No. 22-5140 be referred to the 

merits panel to which this case is assigned. The parties are directed to address in their 

briefs the issues presented in the motion to dismiss rather than incorporate those 

arguments by reference. 
____________ 

USCA Case #22-5140 Document #1963908 Filed: 09/14/2022 Page 2 of 2 

United States Court of Appeals 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 

No. 22-5140 September Term, 2022 

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the 

Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel. 

Per Curiam 

Page 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date and Time:

*Thursday, November 30, 2006 at 10 a.m.*

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items to Be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Best Efforts Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

Best Efforts Policy Statement.

Policy Statement on Probable Cause Hearings.

Sua Sponte Policy.

Management and Administrative Matters.

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                    

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9418 Filed 11-22-06; 11:14 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**


**ACTING
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**


**MALIBU
      MINERALS, INC.**


**FORM
      10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      James
      Laird, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of
      Malibu Minerals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering
      this certificate in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
      Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission ("Annual Report").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                April 17, 2007By:*/s/
                James Laird*
              
              James
                Laird
              Chief
                Executive Officer, President, acting Chief Financial Officer, acting
                Principal Accounting Officer and Director
#### § 301.11 State plan; format.

The State plan must be submitted to the Office in the format and containing the information prescribed by the Office, and within time limits set in implementing instructions issued by the Office. Such time limits will be adequate for proper preparation of plans and submittal in accordance with the requirements for State Governors' review (see § 301.12 of this chapter).

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0253)

[40 FR 27147, June 26, 1975, as amended at 51 FR 37730, Oct. 24, 1986]
#### § 75.317 Insurance coverage.

The non-Federal entity must, at a minimum, provide the equivalent insurance coverage for real property and equipment acquired or improved with Federal funds as provided to other property owned by the non-Federal entity. Federally-owned property need not be insured unless required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
§ 630.500 How are violations of this part determined for recipients other than individuals? A recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Director or designee determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart B of this part; or
( b ) The number of convictions of the recipient's employees for violating criminal drug statutes in the workplace is large enough to indicate that the recipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
#### § 2506.53 When may the Corporation make an offset in an expedited manner?

The Corporation may effect an administrative offset against a payment to be made to you before completion of the procedures required by §§ 2506.51 and 2506.52 if failure to take the offset would substantially jeopardize the Corporation's ability to collect the debt and the time before the payment is to be made does not reasonably permit the completion of those procedures. An expedited offset will be followed promptly by the completion of those procedures. Amounts recovered by offset, but later found not to be owed to the United States, will be promptly refunded.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Remi Barbier, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and Peter S. Roddy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 3, 2006/s/ REMI BARBIERRemi Barbier,Chairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ PETER S. RODDYPeter S. Roddy,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.6

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark W. Marinko, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 24, 2015



/s/ Mark W. MarinkoMark W. MarinkoSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Margaret Lucy, as Administratrix de Bonis Non of Timothy Lucy, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*American Bridge Company, Appellant.

*Lucy*v. *American Bridge Co.,*130 App. Div. 892, affirmed.

(Argued January 26, 1910;

decided February 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 29, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Frederick Collin*for appellant.

*Alexander C. Eustace*and *J. P. Eustace*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
Exhibit 32.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of DB US Dollar Index
Master Trust (the Master Trust), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Master Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Master Trust.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: June 25, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan       
|                     |  | Michael Gilligan           
|                     |  | Principal Financial Officer
#### § 57.4 Acceptance and use of volunteer services.

The Secretary, or his designee, shall establish requirements for: Accepting volunteer services from individuals or groups of individuals, using volunteer services, giving appropriate recognition to volunteers, and maintaining records of volunteer services.