alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-627.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MONGOLIA 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington June 6, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MONGOLIA 

 International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Washington June 6, 2003; 

 Entered into force June 27, 2003.
§ 32.6 Withholding order. ( a ) Unless the Secretary receives information that the Secretary determines justifies a delay or cancellation of a withholding order, the Secretary shall send, by first class mail, an SF-329A “Letter to Employer & Important Notice to Employer,” an SF-329B “Wage Garnishment Order,” an SF-329C “Wage Garnishment Worksheet,” and an SF-329D “Employer Certification,” to the debtor's employer within 30 days after the debtor fails to make a timely request for a hearing, *i.e.,* within 15 business days after mailing the notice required under this part, or, if the timely request for a hearing is made by the debtor, within 30 days after a final decision is made by the Secretary to proceed with garnishment.
( b ) The Secretary shall keep a copy of the dated letter to the employer and a copy of the wage garnishment order. The certificate of service may be retained electronically so long as the manner of retention is sufficient for evidentiary purposes.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the


 


GLORY STAR NEW MEDIA GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED


 


2019 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS AMENDMENT to the Glory Star New Media
Group Holdings Limited 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is dated May 29, 2020.


 


Section 18 of the Plan allows the Board
of Directors of Glory Star New Media Group Holdings Limited (the “Company”) to amend the Plan at any time. The Board
of Directors of the Company finds it to be desirable and in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to clarify that
the Plan covers employees, directors and consultants of the Company’s subsidiaries and variable interest entities.


 


CONSEQUENTLY, the Plan is hereby amended,
effective as of the date specified in the introductory clause:


 


		1.	Section 2(nn) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



 


“Subsidiary” means any entities Controlled
by the Company, provided, however, for the purpose of Incentive Stock Options, “subsidiary” means a “subsidiary
corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424 (f) of the Code. “Control” means,
with respect to any entities, the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management
policies of an entity whether through the ownership of the voting securities of such entity or by contract or otherwise. For purposes
of the Plan, any “variable interest entity” that is consolidated into the consolidated financial statements of the
Company under applicable accounting principles or standards as may apply to the consolidated financial statements of the Company
shall be deemed a Subsidiary.”


 


In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.


 


This Amendment has been executed on the
date specified in the introductory clause.


 


	 	GLORY STAR NEW MEDIA GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Bing Zhang
	 	 	Bing Zhang, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 2554.8 What happens if program fraud is suspected? ( a ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under this Part is warranted, the investigating official submits a report containing the findings and conclusions of the investigation to a reviewing official. The reviewing official is the General Counsel or his or her designee. If the reviewing official determines that the report provides adequate evidence that a person submitted a false claim or statement, the reviewing official transmits to the Attorney General written notice of an intention to refer the matter for adjudication, with a request for approval of such referral. This notice will include the reviewing official's statements concerning: ( 1 ) The reasons for the referral;
( 2 ) The claims or statements upon which liability would be based;
( 3 ) The evidence that supports liability;
( 4 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, services, or other benefits requested or demanded in the false claim or statement;
( 5 ) Any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances that may relate to the claims or statements known by the reviewing official or the investigating official; and
( 6 ) A statement that there is a reasonable prospect of collecting an appropriate amount of penalties and assessments.
( b ) If at any time, the Attorney General or his or her designee requests in writing that this administrative process be stayed, the authority head, as identified in § 2554.9 of this Part, must stay the process immediately. The authority head may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
§ 75.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: ( a ) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.
( b ) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items.
( c ) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity.
( d ) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.
( e ) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part.
( f ) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See also § 75.306(b).
( g ) Be adequately documented. See also §§ 75.300 through 75.309.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officers of Solarfun Power Holdings Co., Ltd. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officers' knowledge, that:

                  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 30, 2007                     By: /s/ Yonghua Lu
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Yonghua Lu
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



Date: June 30, 2007                     By: /s/ Kevin Wei
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Kevin Wei
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Solarfun Power Holdings Co., Ltd., and will be retained by Solarfun
Power Holdings Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the
Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-520.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SIERRA LEONE 

Signed at Freetown March 31, 2003 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SIERRA LEONE 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement signed at Freetown March 31, 2003; 

 Entered into force May 20, 2003.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10771-10772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, GEI Genotyping and Coordinating Centers.
    Date: March 30, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-0838.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 10772]]


    Dated: March 5, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1112 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 615.2 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests for factual or expert testimony or for official records or information in legal proceedings, whether or not the United States is a party, except that it does not apply to: ( a ) Demands upon or requests for an NSF employee to testify as to facts or events that are in no way related to his or her official duties or to the functions of NSF,
( b ) Demands upon or requests for a former NSF employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at NSF,
( c ) Demands upon or requests for an NSF reviewer to testify as to matters not directly related to that individual's employment by or service to NSF, and
( d ) Congressional demands and requests for testimony or records.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

TO: 

FROM: 

Thru: 

OFFICE OF WATER 

Posting EPA-HQ-OW~2010-0824 to Regulations.gov for Public Access 

Assem Akram, HQ Docket Office .._ 

Janet Goodwin, Chief ~ /-'--

Technology & Statisti Branch 

ngineerll)g-¥oo~is Division 

~~~ bert Wood, Director 

Engineering & Analysis Division 

This memorandum authorizes the posting of new information to EPA-HQ-OW-2010-

0824 in Regulations.gov for public access. 

This record supports the final Effluent Guidelines Plan for the 2011-2012 planning cycle. 

The Final Plan was published in the Federal Register on September 16, 2014 (79 FR 

55472). The Final Plan does not include a solicitation for comment, however, we need to 

add information to this docket to support the decisions announced in the Final Plan. 

The Federal Register notice was announcing two plans that were published 

simultaneously. The second plan is the Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Plan for the 

2013-2014 planning cycle. The Preliminary 2014 Plan is a new action for EPA and 

therefore has a separate docket: EP A-HQ-20 14-0170. This docket was noticed in the 

Federal Register on September 16, and is accessible to the public. However, the older 

docket, EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824, that supports the 2012 Preliminary Plan must now be 

reopened to add material that supports the 2012 FINAL Plan. · 

Both the Final 2010 Plan and the Preliminary 2014 Plan are found on the same web page 

http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/304m/index.cfm and links to both dockets are 

located on that web page. 

It is essential that docket number EPA-HQ-2010-0824 be reopened to allow for additional 

information to be entered so that the public can understand the Agency's basis for making 

decisions that are announced in the Final2012 plan. 

If you have any questions please contact Janet Goodwin at 202-566-1060. 

Internet Address (URL) • http:!!www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed \'Yith Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Poslconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
Editorial Note on Part 304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 304.21 Federal financial participation in the costs of cooperative arrangements with courts and law enforcement officials. ( a ) *General.* Subject to the conditions and limitations specified in this part, Federal financial participation (FFP) at the applicable matching rate is available in the costs of cooperative agreements with appropriate courts and law enforcement officials in accordance with the requirements of § 302.34 of this chapter. *Law enforcement officials* mean district attorneys, attorneys general, similar public attorneys and prosecutors and their staff, and corrections officials. When performed under agreement, which is reflected in a record, costs of the following activities are subject to reimbursement: ( 1 ) The activities, including administration of such activities, specified in § 304.20(b)(2) through (8), (11), and (12);
( 2 ) Reasonable and essential short term training of court and law enforcement staff assigned on a full or part time basis to support enforcement functions under the cooperative agreement.
( b ) *Limitations.* Federal financial participation is not available in: ( 1 ) Service of process and court filing fees unless the court or law enforcement agency would normally be required to pay the cost of such fees;
( 2 ) Costs of compensation (salary and fringe benefits) of judges;
( 3 ) Costs of travel and training related to the judicial determination process incurred by judges;
( 4 ) Office-related costs, such as space, equipment, furnishings and supplies, incurred by judges;
( 5 ) Compensation (salary and fringe benefits), travel and training, and office-related costs incurred by administrative and support staffs of judges;
( 6 ) Costs of cooperative arrangements that do not meet the requirements of § 303.107 of this chapter.
( c ) *Methods of determining costs.* The State IV-D agency has discretion with respect to the method of calculating eligible expenditures by courts and law enforcement officials under cooperative agreements. However, any method used must account for specific costs incurred on behalf of cases receiving services under the IV-D State plan.
( d ) *When agreements take effect.* FFP is available in IV-D costs incurred as of the first day of the calendar quarter in which a cooperative agreement or amendment is signed by parties sufficient to create a contractual arrangement under State law.
[47 FR 53017, Nov. 24, 1982, as amended at 47 FR 57284, Dec. 23, 1982; 50 FR 19656, May 9, 1985; 54 FR 30223, July 19, 1989; 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999; 81 FR 93567, Dec. 20, 2016]
§ 670.13 Permit administration. ( a ) *Issuance of the permits.* The Director may approve any application in whole or part. Permits shall be issued in writing and signed by the Director. Each permit may contain such terms and conditions as are consistent with the Act and this part.
( b ) *Denial.* The applicant shall be notified in writing of the denial of any permit request or part of a request and of the reason for such denial. If authorized in the notice of denial, the applicant may submit further information or reasons why the permit should not be denied. Such further submissions shall not be considered a new application.
( c ) *Amendment of applications or permits.* An applicant or permit holder desiring to have any term or condition of his application or permit modified must submit full justification and supporting information in conformance with the provisions of this subpart and the subpart governing the activities sought to be carried out under the modified permit. Any application for modification of a permit that involves a material change beyond the terms originally requested will normally be subject to the same procedures as a new application.
( d ) *Notice of issuance or denial.* Within 10 days after the date of the issuance or denial of a permit, the Director shall publish notice of the issuance or denial in the Federal Register.
( e ) *Agents of the permit holder.* The Director may authorize the permit holder to designate agents to act on behalf of the permit holder.
( f ) *Marine mammals, endangered species, and migratory birds.* If the Director receives a permit application involving any native mammal which is a marine mammal as defined by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1362(5)), any species which is an endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.*) or any native bird which is protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.*), the Director shall submit a copy of the application to the Secretary of Commerce or to the Secretary of the Interior, as appropriate. If the appropriate Secretary determines that a permit should not be issued pursuant to any of the cited acts, the Director shall not issue a permit. The Director shall inform the applicant of any denial by the appropriate Secretary and no further action shall be taken on the application. If, however, the appropriate Secretary issues a permit pursuant to the requirements of the cited acts, the Director still must determine whether the proposed action is consistent with the Act and the regulations in this part.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40121 Summary Calendar OSSIE ROBERT TRADER Petitioner-Appellant

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CV-545
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ossie Robert Trader, federal prisoner # 32019-066, was convicted of armed bank robbery and using and carrying a firearm during a crime ofviolence, and he was sentenced to serve 248 months in prison. He filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition to challenge his convictions and to raise a claim related to his fine, and he now appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 2241 petition. Trader argues that his Speedy Trial rights were violated pursuant to United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 17, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-40121

2 the principles set forth in Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006), and that his fine is invalid. Trader has not shown that the district court erred by concluding that his Speedy Trial claim, which arises from events that occurred prior to sentencing, was not cognizable in a § 2241 proceeding. See Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr., 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990). He likewise has not shown that he should be permitted to proceed under the savings clause of§ 2255, as he has not shown that his Speedy Trial claim is based on a retroactively applicable case or that he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. See Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Finally, he has not shown that the district court erred by concluding that it lackedjurisdiction toconsider his claim challengi ng his fine because this claim did not satisfy the in custody requirement of § 2241. See § 2241(c); United States v. H atten, 167 F.3d 884, 885 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1137-38 (5th Cir.1994). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.