Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51248 Su m m ar y Cal endar C OL I N A . R OA C H Pet i t i o ne r - Appe l l ant v. ERI C H H OLD ER, J R, U S ATTORN EY GE N ERA L , ET AL. R espon den t s - A pp el l ees

A p p ea lf

rom the U n i tedS tates D i stri ct C ou rt f or th e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 08- C V - 459 B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * C oli n A . R oac h appeal s f r om t he deni al of hi s pet i t i on f or a w r i tof

habeas c o r p u s . S ee 2 8 U. S . C. § 2 2 4 1 . W e AF FI RM . In an app eal such as t h i s, w e revi ew t h e di st ri ct court’ s f i n di n gs of

factf or c l e a re r r o ra n dit s c o n c l u s i o n s o f l a w de no vo . D ayv . Q uar t e r m an , 566 F. 3d 527, 53 5 ( 5th Ci r . 2 00 9) . W e apply t he s am e s t and ar d o f r e vi e w t o t he f

i ndi ngs a nd c o nc l us i o ns o f

t he m agi s t r at e j udg e w he r e t he m agi s t r at e j udg e ha s de c i de d the United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

21, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 51248

2 c a s e u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 6 3 6 . L ocket t e v. G reyhou n dL i n es, I n c. , 817 F. 2d 1182, 1 1 8 5 (5 th C ir . 1 9 8 7 ). O n A u gu st16, 200 7, an i m m i grati on j u dg e f ou n d R oach rem ovab l e un der S ect i on 237 ( a) ( 2) ( B ) (i) of t h e I m m i grati on an d N ati on al i t yA ct a s an al i en c onvi c t ed o f

a v i ol at i on o f

any l aw r el at i ng t o ac ont r oll ed s ubst ance , othert han a si n gl e of

fen se i n volvi n g possess i on f or one’ s ow n use of

30 gram s orl ess of m ar ij uana. Roach’ s appealt o the B oar d o f Im m i gr at i on A ppeal s ( B IA) w as d is m is s e do n D e c e m b e r2 0 , 2 0 0 7 . S in c e t h a t tim e , R o a c h h a s b e e n d e ta in e d . S ee 8 U . S . C . § 1231 . H e h as f i l ed a seri es of m ot i on s t o rec on si der or r eopen hi s c ase w ith th e B IA , a ll o f w h ic h h a v e b e e n d is m is s e do rd e n ie d . O n A pril 20, 2008, R oac h f i l ed a Sec t i on 2241 pet i t i on f ora w r i tof

habeas c or pus i n di st r i c tc our t , c hal l engi ngh i s ar r es tand s ubse quentdet ent i on as u n constit u t i on al . W i t h t h e consent of t h e parti es, t h e case w a s a ss ign e d t o a U ni t ed St at es m agi st r at e j udge f orallpr oc ee di n gs and t he e nt r y o f f i nal j u dg m en t . Th e m agis t rat e j u dg e foun d R oach ’ s i n i t i alarres tau t h ori zed u n der 8 U . S. C . § 1226(c ) ( 1) . Furt her , hi s c ont i nued det ent i on w as f ound t o b e au t h ori zed u n der 8 U . S . C . § 1231 an d constit u t i on alun der Za d vy d a s v . D a v is , 5 3 3 U .S . 6 7 8 , 7 0 1 (2 0 0 1 ). S p e c ific a ll y , t h e m a g is tr a te ju d g e fo u n dth a t b yh is r e p e a t e df

i l i n g s w i t h t h e B IA , R o a c h p r e v e n t e dU . S . I mmi g r a t i o n a n dC u s t o ms E n fo r c e m e n t fr o m o b ta in in gR o a c h ’ s tr a v e l d o c u m e n ts fo rre m o v a l. T h is in te r fe r e n c e e x te n d e dh is re m o v a l p e r io da n dd e te n tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1231( a ) ( 1 ) ( C) , whi c h p r o v i d e s t ha t t he r e m o v a l p e r i o d a nd d e t e nt i o n s ha l lbe e x t e n d e db e y o n dn in e t yd a y s i f t h e a li e n “ c o n s p ir e s o ra c t s to p r e v e n tth e a li e n ’s rem ov a lsu bj ect to an ord er of rem ov a l . ” W i t h l iberalconst ructi on , R oach ’ s pro se ap pe alc hal l en ge s t he con sti tu ti on a l i ty of h i s con ti n u edde ten ti on . W e con cl u d e th a t R oa ch fa i l edto m eethi s i n i t i albu rden of proof i n show i n g th e re is n o si gn i f i can tl i kelih ood of r e m o v a l int h e re a s o n a b lyfo r e s e e a b le fu tu r e . Zadvy das , 5 3 3 U .S . a t 7 0 1 ; seeN o. 08- 51248

3 als o Andr adev . G on zal es , 4 59 F. 3d5 38 , 5 43 - 44 ( 5th Ci r . 2 00 6) . Fur t he r , t he m agi s t r at e j udg e di d no te r ri n f i ndi ng t hatRoa c h’ s r e pe at e d f i l i ngs w i t h t he B IAconst i t u t ed acts t o preven th i s rem oval, thu s extend i n g h i s r em oval peri od u n d e r 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 3 1 (a)(1)(C ). Ac c o r d i n g l y , we AF FI RM .