alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1746 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to reauthorize the pre-disaster mitigation program of the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. MICA, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. MARIO DIAZBALART of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to reauthorize the pre-disaster mitigation program of the Federal Emergency Management 

Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pre-Disaster Mitiga5 tion Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRE-DISASTER HAZARD MITIGATION. 

7 (a) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—Section 203(f) of the 

8 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency AssistVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:45 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1746.IH H1746

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1746 IH

1 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133(f)) is amended to read as fol2 lows: 

3 ‘‘(f) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall award 

5 financial assistance under this section on a competi6 tive basis and in accordance with the criteria in sub7 section (g). 

8 ‘‘(2) MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AMOUNTS.—In 

9 providing financial assistance under this section, the 

10 President shall ensure that the amount of financial 

11 assistance made available to a State (including 

12 amounts made available to local governments of the 

13 State) for a fiscal year— 

14 ‘‘(A) is not less than the lesser of— 

15 ‘‘(i) $575,000; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) the amount that is equal to one 

17 percent of the total funds appropriated to 

18 carry out this section for the fiscal year; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(B) does not exceed the amount that is 

21 equal to 15 percent of the total funds appro22 priated to carry out this section for the fiscal 

23 year.’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1746 IH

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 203(m) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 5133(m)) is amended to 

3 read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(m) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

5 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

6 $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 

7 2012.’’. 

8 (c) REFERENCES.—Section 203 of such Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 5133) is amended— 

10 (1) in the section heading by striking 

11 ‘‘PREDISASTER’’ and inserting ‘‘PRE-DISASTER’’; 

12 (2) in the heading for subsection (i) by striking 

13 ‘‘PREDISASTER’’ and inserting ‘‘PRE-DISASTER’’; 

14 (3) by striking ‘‘Predisaster’’ each place it ap15 pears and inserting ‘‘Pre-Disaster’’; and 

16 (4) by striking ‘‘predisaster’’ each place it ap17 pears and inserting ‘‘pre-disaster’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 32.12 Right of action. ( a ) The employer of a debtor subject to wage withholding pursuant to this part shall pay to the Department as directed in a withholding order issued under this part.
( b ) The Secretary may bring suit against an employer for any amount that the employer fails to withhold from wages owed and payable to a debtor in accordance with §§ 32.6 and 32.8, plus attorney's fees, costs, and, if applicable, punitive damages.
( c ) A suit under this section may not be filed before the termination of the collection action involving a particular debtor, unless earlier filing is necessary to avoid expiration of any applicable statute of limitations period. For purposes of this section, “termination of collection action” occurs when the Secretary has terminated collection action in accordance with part 30 of this title, or other applicable law or regulation.
( d ) Notwithstanding deemed to occur if from a debtor whose paragraph (c) of this section, termination of the collection action will be a period of one (1) year the Department does not receive any payments wages were subject to a garnishment order issued under this part.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547 uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com December 1 5 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Namkrow Aerial Visuals Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Namkrow Aerial Visuals

, an operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography and

v ideography

, seeks exemption f rom the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the previously approved DJI Phontom 3 Pro, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Ins pire 1 Pro, DJI S900, DJI S1000, DJI Matrice 100, Tarot T960, Foxtech D130, and the Foxtech K130 X8 within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled,
low

- risk, aerial video and photography

, aerial mapping and survey

, precision agriculture,

p owerline inspection, news media , and potential closed set filming over certain areas of the United States, conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirement s.

Namkrow Aerial Visuals in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c),

91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.
Namkrow Aerial Visuals has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is
identical to numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA . 14 C.F.R. § 11.87

.
In addition

, Namkrow Aerial Visuals will be utilizing the pr oven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in numerous other approved exemptions. Combined, th e
comp rehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to
the se chosen products and th e technology, should provide the support necessary to theUASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547 uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com FAA for a S ummary G rant of Namkrow Aerial Visuals ’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker CEO UASolutions Group, Inc.
Subject: Site visit to Cemex, Brooksville, Florida

Date: February 8, 2012

A site visit was made on February 8, 2012, to the Cemex Portland Cement facility in 

Brooksville, Florida by S. Nizich of the EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and 

contractors from RTI International. A report summarizing the site visit has been prepared but is 

currently considered confidential business information pending further company review.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

FBR CAPITAL
MARKETS CORPORATION

A VIRGINIA CORPORATION



|                                        |  |               
|--------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      |  | JURISDICTION  
|FBR Asset Management Holdings, Inc.     |  | Virginia      
|FBR Fund Advisers, Inc.                 |  | Delaware      
|FBR Investment Management, Inc.         |  | Delaware      
|FBR Capital Markets Holdings, Inc.      |  | Delaware      
|FBR Capital Markets & Co.               |  | Delaware      
|FBR Investment Services, Inc.           |  | Delaware      
|FBR Capital Markets International, Ltd. |  | United Kingdom
|FBR Capital Markets LT, Inc.            |  | Delaware      
|FBR Capital Markets PT, Inc.            |  | Virginia
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

May 31, 2000



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 08536

Attention:  Ms. Theresa C. Morris

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Ms. Morris:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management  Agreements through June 30, 2001and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

                       Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II
                       Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
                       Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
                       BBK Global  Futures Fund

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the  attention of Mr. Daniel  Dantuono at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer


AGREED AND ACCEPTED

WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, INC.


By:

Print Name:


DAD/sr
#### § 660.13 May the Director waive any provision of these regulations?

In an emergency, the Director may waive any provision of these regulations.
Exhibit 10.26


 


Amendment
to 


HYCROFT
MINING CORPORATION 


Restricted
stock unit agreement 


(TIME-VESTING)


 


THIS AMENDMENT (the
 “Amendment”) to the Hycroft Mining Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Time-Vesting) by and between
Hycroft Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and Stephen M. Jones (the “Participant”)
made and entered into as of February 20, 2019 (the “Agreement”) is made as of May 29, 2020 (the “Effective
Date”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Hycroft
Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) sponsors the Plan for the benefit of its employees
and its stockholders;


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has entered into that certain Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2020, as amended as of February 26,
2020, by and among the Company, Mudrick Capital Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“MUDS”) and
MUDS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (each of MUDS and MUDS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a “Buyer”);


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has agreed to assign the Plan to a Buyer or one of their affiliates and the Buyers have agreed that a Buyer or an affiliate
will assume sponsorship of the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, it
is desirable to amend the Agreement to reflect changes resulting from the foregoing.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended as of the Effective Date so that: (i) references to the “Corporation” in the
Agreement be revised to mean “Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation” and (ii) references to the “Plan”
in the Agreement be revised to mean the “Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation 2020 Performance and Incentive Pay Plan.”


 


[Signature page to follow]


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	HYCROFT MINING CORPORATION
	 
	 	By:	/s/ Randy Buffington
	 	 	Randy Buffington,
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer




 





	 	PARTICIPANT
	 	 
	 	/s/ Stephen M. Jones
	 	Stephen M. Jones



 






    - 2 -
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Current Report of Mobile Reach International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 8-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Hewitt, Chief
Executive Office of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Action of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                            /s/  Michael J. Hewitt
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Michael J. Hewitt
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

March 12th, 2004
§ 689.4 Role of awardee institutions. ( a ) Awardee institutions bear primary responsibility for prevention and detection of research misconduct and for the inquiry, investigation, and adjudication of alleged research misconduct. In most instances, NSF will rely on awardee institutions to promptly: ( 1 ) Initiate an inquiry into any suspected or alleged research misconduct;
( 2 ) Conduct a subsequent investigation, if warranted;
( 3 ) Take action necessary to ensure the integrity of research, the rights and interests of research subjects and the public, and the observance of legal requirements or responsibilities; and
( 4 ) Provide appropriate safeguards for subjects of allegations as well as informants.
( b ) If an institution wishes NSF to defer independent inquiry or investigation, it should: ( 1 ) Complete any inquiry and decide whether an investigation is warranted within 90 days. If completion of an inquiry is delayed, but the institution wishes NSF deferral to continue, NSF may require submission of periodic status reports.
( 2 ) Inform OIG immediately if an initial inquiry supports a formal investigation.
( 3 ) Keep OIG informed during such an investigation.
( 4 ) Complete any investigation and reach a disposition within 180 days. If completion of an investigation is delayed, but the institution wishes NSF deferral to continue, NSF may require submission of periodic status reports.
( 5 ) Provide OIG with the final report from any investigation.
( c ) NSF expects institutions to promptly notify OIG should the institution become aware during an inquiry or investigation that: ( 1 ) Public health or safety is at risk;
( 2 ) NSF's resources, reputation, or other interests need protecting;
( 3 ) There is reasonable indication of possible violations of civil or criminal law;
( 4 ) Research activities should be suspended;
( 5 ) Federal action may be needed to protect the interests of a subject of the investigation or of others potentially affected; or
( 6 ) The scientific community or the public should be informed.
( d ) Awardee institutions should maintain and effectively communicate to their staffs appropriate policies and procedures relating to research misconduct, which should indicate when NSF should be notified.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Effects of oil and gasexploration and development at selected continental slope sites in the Gulf ofMexico [electronic resource] /**
 
SuDoc Number:I 72.12/2:2006-044

Item Number:0671-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000714072
 
Summary |Report | Appendices
 
March 17, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AQUA VIE
BEVERAGE CORPORATION STATEMENTS AS OF JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    195,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,174
<PP&E>                                          62,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 380,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          935,151
<BONDS>                                        340,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                        25,416
<OTHER-SE>                                   (920,410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   380,167
<SALES>                                         17,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               243,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (302,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (302,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (302,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
§ 703.7 Subcommittees—Special assignments. Subject to the approval of the designated Commission employee, an Advisory Committee may: ( a ) Establish subcommittees, composed of members of the Committee, to study and report upon matters under consideration and authorize such subcommittees to take specific action within the competence of the Committee; and
( b ) Designate individual members of the Committee to perform special projects involving research or study on matters under consideration by the Committee.
Exhibit 33.3


                       REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(l)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.

FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, LP.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
    General Partner


/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
-------------------------------------
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
§ 701.11 Commission meetings—duties of the Chairperson. ( a ) At a meeting of the Commission in each calendar year, the Commission shall, by vote of the majority, adopt a schedule of Commission meetings for the following calendar year.
( b ) In addition to the regularly scheduled meetings, it is the responsibility of the Chairperson to call the Commission to meet in a special open meeting at such time and place as he or she shall deem appropriate; provided however, that upon the motion of a member, and a favorable vote by a majority of Commission members, a special meeting of the Commission may be held in the absence of a call by the Chairperson.
( c ) The Chairperson, after consulting with the Staff Director, shall establish the agenda for each meeting. The agenda at the meeting of the Commission may be modified by the addition or deletion of specific items upon the motion of a Commissioner and a favorable vote by a majority of the members.
( d ) In the event that after consulting with the members of the Commission and consideration of the views of the members the Chairperson determines that there are insufficient substantive items on a proposed meeting agenda to warrant holding a scheduled meeting, the Chairperson may cancel such meeting.
1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1050

___________ Gerry C. DuBose, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Jennifer L. Carey; John D. Kelly; Hanft, * Fride, O’Brien, Harries, Swelbar & * [UNPUBLISHED] Burns, P.A., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 4, 2009 Filed: June 8, 2009

___________ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nearly two years after this court af firmed the adverse judgment in Gerry DuBose’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Je nnifer Carey, John Kelly, and their law firm, see DuBose v. Carey , 204 Fed. Appx. 579 (8th Cir. Nov. 9, 2006) (unpublished per curiam), DuBose filed a motion for re lief under Federal Ruleof Civil Procedure 60(b), restating theories he had advanced earlier without success. The district court 1-2- denied DuBose’s motion, finding it untimely and without merit. He appeals, and, following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. SeeMiddleton v. McDonald , 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________