alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 5986.

#### J. P. Robinson *v.*The State.

Local Option Law—Penalty—Charge op the Ootjht—Case Ap proved.—See the opinion for an approval of the ruling of this court in Dawson’s case, 25 Texas Court of Appeals, 670, to the effect that the act of March 30, 1887, amendatory of the local option law, can not affect those localities wherein the law was in operation at the time of the adoption of the said amendment, and that it can affect only those localities wherein the local option law was adopted subsequent to the date at which the said amendment took effect. This conviction was had in W. county, wherein the local option law was in force prior to tbe adoption of the amendatory act of March 30, 1887, notwithstanding which the trial court gave in charge to the jury the penalty prescribed by the said amendatory act, instead of that prescribed by the general law. *Held,*error.

Appeal from the County Court of Wise. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Bullock, County Judge.

The opinion discloses the case. The penalty assessed was a fine of twenty-five dollars and confinement in the county jail for twenty days.

*Graham & McMurray*and *Patterson & Martin,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe State.

Hurt, Judge.

Tbis is a conviction for Violating tbe local option law.

It appears from tbe record before us tbat tbe act of selling tbe liquor was committed on the sixth of February, 1888. Tbe *83©lection at which the law was adopted in and for Wise county, was held on the fourteenth day óf March, 1887. The trial was had on the eleventh day of April, 1888. The act of the Legislature amending the local option law took effect March 30, 1887.

Opinion delivered June 29, 1888.

It will be seen from the above statement that the people of Wise county adopted the law as it stood before the amendments were made by the Legislature, and that the offense was committed and the trial had after such amendment had been enacted.

The court charged the penalty prescribed by the amendment of March 30, 1887. This court, at this term, has held that, when the people of a certain locality have adopted the local option law at an election held before the amendment was passed, such amendment was not intended to, and can not affect the law as it existed in such locality prior to the amendment. (See Dawson v. The State, 25 Texas Ct. App., 670.) The amended law will be in force and operate in such localities only as since its passage may, by election, adopt its provisions. This decision is decisive of this case.

Because the court erred in charging the penalty prescribed in the amended law of March 30, 1887, which amended law was not in force in Wise county, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to be tried under the old law.

*Reversed and*remanded.
Case 1:12-cv-01451-JEB-JRB-RLW   Document 22   Filed 11/01/12   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:12-cv-01451-JEB-JRB-RLW   Document 22   Filed 11/01/12   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:12-cv-01451-JEB-JRB-RLW   Document 22   Filed 11/01/12   Page 3 of 3
#### W. H. Brace Company, Appellant, *v.*Frank A. Kraft et al., Respondents.

(Submitted January 17, 1910;

decided January 25, 1910.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 196 N. Y. 468.)
#### § 681.43 How are civil penalties and assessments collected?

Section 3806 and 3808(b) of title 31, United States Code, authorize actions for collection of civil penalties and assessments imposed under this part and specify the procedures for such actions.
# 2021 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
#### § 96.40 Scope.

This subpart applies to the community services, alcohol and drug abuse and mental health services, preventive health and health services, primary care, and low-income home energy assistance block grants.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Availability of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and 
Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision (FONSI/ROD) 
Executed by the Michigan Department of Transportation--Bureau of 
Aeronautics and Freight Services (MDOT) and the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) for the Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 
Associated With Proposed Airport Improvements for the Jackson County 
Airport, Located in Jackson, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of availability of an EA and FONSI/ROD executed by MDOT 
and the FAA for the evaluation of environmental impacts associated with 
proposed airport improvements for the Jackson County Airport located in 
Jackson, Michigan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is making available an EA and FONSI/ROD for the 
evaluation of environmental impacts associated with proposed 
improvements to the Jackson County Airport located in Jackson, 
Michigan. The proposed improvements include the relocation of Runway 6/
24 and the shift and extension of Runway 14/32.

Point of Contact:
    Mr. Brad Davidson, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA Great 
Lakes Region, Detroit Airports District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, 
Suite 107, Romulus, MI 48174, (734) 229-2900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is making available an EA and FONSI/
ROD for the evaluation of environmental impacts associated with 
proposed airport improvements, executed by MDOT and the FAA, for the 
Jackson County Airport located in Jackson, Michigan. The purpose of the 
EA and FONSI/ROD was to evaluate potential environmental impacts 
arising from the proposed airport improvement project involving the 
relocation of Runway 06/24 and a shift and extension to Runway 14/32.
    These documents will be available during normal business hours at 
the following location: FAA Detroit Airports District Office, 11677 
South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, MI 48174.
    Due to current security requirements, arrangements must be made 
with the point of contact prior to visiting this office.

    Issued in Detroit, Michigan, December 13, 2006.
Irene R. Porter,
Manager, Detroit Airport District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 06-9941 Filed 12-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-461-CR

PEDRO MACIAS LUEVANO	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Pedro Macias Luevano appeals from his conviction for the felony offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI).  We affirm.

	Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967) by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no reversible grounds on appeal and referencing any grounds that arguably might support the appeal.  See Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922-23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).

	Appellant’s counsel presents a discussion of a single potential ground of error:  whether the trial court erred by allowing the State to read to the jury appellant’s stipulation that he had been convicted of two prior DWI offenses. Although appellant was given an opportunity to file a pro se appellate brief, he has not done so.

	In a felony DWI case, the two prior convictions are jurisdictional elements that must be proven to obtain a conviction for the charged offense.  Hollen v. State, 117 S.W.3d 798, 801 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 992 (2004).  Accordingly, it is not error for the trial court to admit into evidence a defendant’s stipulation of his two prior convictions.  Id. at 802.  We overrule the potential ground of error.

	Once an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record and essentially to rebrief the case for the appellant to see if there is any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

	In addition to the matter we have already addressed, our independent review of the record shows that there is no error that arguably might support an appeal or require reversal.  There are no jurisdictional errors.  The indictment conferred jurisdiction on the trial court and provided appellant with sufficient notice to prepare a defense.  See Tex. Const. art. V, § 12; Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 4.05 (Vernon 2005); Duron v. State, 956 S.W.2d 547, 550-51 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).  The trial court properly charged the jury on the charged offense and the applicable range of punishment, and the punishment assessed is within the statutory range.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.34, 49.04 (Vernon 2003), § 49.09(b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).  Therefore, we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 28, 2005
#### § 605.40 [Reserved]
#### Edward G. Brown, *Respondent, v.*Caroline Nesmith and others, *Executors, etc.,*Appellants.

Judgment reversed, new trial ■ ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
§ 73.735-704 Professional and consultative services. ( a ) Employees may engage in outside professional or consultative work only after meeting certain conditions. Except as provided in §§ 73.735-705 and 73.735-706 for activities discussed in those sections, the conditions which must be met are: ( 1 ) The work is not to be rendered, with or without compensation, to organizations, institutions, or state or local governments with which the official duties of the employee are directly related, or indirectly related if the indirect relationship is significant enough to cause the existence of conflict or apparent conflict of interest; or
( 2 ) The work is not to be rendered for compensation to help a person, institution, or government unit prepare or aid in the preparation of grant applications, contract proposals, program reports, and other material which are designed to become the subject of dealings between the institutions or government units and the Federal Government. All requests to perform consultative services, either compensated or uncompensated, for institutions or government units which have recently negotiated or may in the near future seek a contract or grant from this Department must be carefully appraised to avoid any conflict or apparent conflict of interest.
( b ) Advance administrative approval in accordance with § 73.735-708 of this subpart must be obtained. Such approval is required whether or not the services are for compensation, and whether or not related to the employee's official duties.
( c ) For the purpose of this section, “professional and consultative work” is performance of work requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a course of specialized instruction and study in an institution of higher education, or hospital which requires the exercise of judgment and discretion in its performance and is primarily intellectual in nature as opposed to manual, mechanical or physical work.
( d ) Membership on a Board of Directors, Board of Regents, Board of Trustees, Planning Commission, Advisory Council or Committee, or on any similar body which provides advice, counsel, or consultation, shall be considered outside consultative services for which advance administrative approval is required.
§ 95.22 Meaning of good cause. ( a ) Good cause for the late filing of a claim is lateness due to circumstances beyond the State's control.
( b ) Examples of circumstances beyond the State's control include: ( 1 ) Acts of God;
( 2 ) Documented action or inaction of the Federal government.
( c ) Circumstances beyond the State's control do not include neglect or administrative inadequacy on the part of the State, State agencies, the State legislature or any of their offices, officers, or employees.
#### § 84.41 Application of this subpart.

Subpart E applies to postsecondary education programs or activities, including postsecondary vocational education programs or activities, that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.

[42 FR 22677, May 4, 1977, as amended at 70 FR 24320, May 9, 2005]
§ 800.203 Medical loss ratio. ( a ) *Required medical loss ratio.* An MSP issuer must attain: ( 1 ) The medical loss ratio (MLR) required under section 2718 of the PHS Act and regulations promulgated by HHS; and
( 2 ) Any MSP-specific MLR that OPM may set in the best interests of MSP enrollees or that is necessary to be consistent with a State's requirements with respect to MLR.
( b ) *Consequences of not attaining required medical loss ratio.* If an MSP issuer fails to attain an MLR set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, OPM may take any appropriate action, including but not limited to intermediate sanctions, such as suspension of marketing, decertifying an MSP option in one or more States, or terminating an MSP issuer's contract pursuant to § 800.404 of this part.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of person privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Partnerships with Public-
Private Partnerships.
    Date: April 2-3, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Thames E. Pickett, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f2f363c343a2b2b2b3a1f31363e363b7131363771383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92e2fbf1f9f7e6e6e6f7d2fcfbf3fbf6bcfcfbfabcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Unsolicited P01 Immune Deficiency 
in HIV Infection.
    Date: April 4, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, 3129, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Eleazar Cohen, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3129, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-3564, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f39690c2c484b39d9a929a97dd9d9a9bdd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6d3d58781c1f6d8dfd7dfd298d8dfde98d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1097 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-220 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MONGOLIA 

Signed at Washington October 23, 2007 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MONGOLIA 

 Weapons: Proliferation 

Agreement signed at Washington October 23, 2007; 

 Entered into force February 20, 2008.
EXHIBIT
23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of
Directors
Universal Power Group, Inc.:

We consent to
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-142736 on Form S-8
of Universal Power Group, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2009 relating to
the balance sheets of Universal Power Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and
2007 and the related statements of income, changes in shareholders equity
and cash flows for each of the years then ended, which report is included in
the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Universal Power Group, Inc.

|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ KBA GROUP LLP
|                 
|Dallas,
 Texas   
|March 31,
 2009  

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                               GENSYM CORPORATION
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               JURISDICTION OF
                               NAME                             INCORPORATION
                               ----                            ---------------
      <S>                                                    <C>
      Gensym International Corporation...................... Delaware
      Gensym Securities Corporation......................... Massachusetts
      Gensym FSC............................................ U.S. Virgin Islands
      Gensym B.V. .......................................... The Netherlands
      Gensym Canada Ltd. ................................... Canada
      Gensym GmbH........................................... Germany
      Gensym S.A. .......................................... France
      Gensym Ltd. .......................................... United Kingdom
      Gensym Srl............................................ Italy
      Gensym MENA........................................... Tunisia
      Gensym AB............................................. Sweden
      Gensym Japan Corporation.............................. Japan
      Gensym Asia Pacific Pte, Ltd. ........................ Singapore
</TABLE>
#### § 81.78 Evidence.

Irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable, and unduly repetitious evidence will be excluded.
#### § 81.23 Complainants not parties.

A person submitting a complaint pursuant to § 80.7(b) of this title is not a party to the proceedings governed by this part, but may petition, after proceedings are initiated, to become an amicus curiae.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF LOUISIANA,

et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

Case No. 15-cv-01241 (CRC)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED that [3] Plaintiffs’ Motion to Convene a Three-Judge Court is GRANTED. It 

is further

ORDERED that the parties adhere to the following schedule for discovery and summaryjudgment briefing:

(a) Last written discovery requests served by December 29, 2015;

(b) Expert reports (if any) due by December 23, 2015;

(c) Rebuttal expert reports (if any) due by January 11, 2016;

(d) Last deposition notices served by January 15, 2016;

(e) Discovery to be completed by January 29, 2016;

(f) Plaintiffs’ summary-judgment motion, not to exceed 45 pages, due by February 12, 2016;

(g) Defendant’s summary-judgment motion and opposition, not to exceed 50 pages, due by 

March 11, 2016;

(h) Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply, not to exceed 30 pages, due by April 8, 2016;

(i) Defendant’s reply, not to exceed 25 pages, due by April 29, 2016.

Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC Document 23 Filed 11/25/15 Page 1 of 2
It is further 

ORDERED that [9] Plaintiffs’ Motion to Expedite is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: November 25, 2015

2

Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC Document 23 Filed 11/25/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: North Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee, Kamiah, ID, 
USDA, Forest Service.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Nez Perce and 
Clearwater National Forests' North Central Idaho Resource Advisory 
Committee will meet Friday, February 24th, 2006, in Lewiston, Idaho for 
a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on February 24th, 2006, 
will be held at the Idaho State Fish and Game Office, 3316 16th Street, 
Lewiston, Idaho, beginning at 10 a.m. (PST). Agenda topics will include 
discussion of potential projects. A public forum will begin at 2:30 
p.m. (PST).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ihor Mereszczak, Staff Officer and 
Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 935-2513.

    Dated: January 25, 2006.
Ihor Mereszczak,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-976 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M