alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2009295EN.01010301.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 295/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 295/103

---

Tuesday 2 September 2008Protocol to the EC-Tajikistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement *

P6_TA(2008)0375

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 September 2008 on the proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (COM(2007)0143 — C6-0254/2008 — 2007/0050(CNS))

2009/C 295 E/31

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision (COM(2007)0143),

having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with the Republic of Tajikistan,

having regard to Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a, and Article 300(2), second sentence, of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 101 of the Euratom Treaty,

having regard to Article 6(2) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0254/2008),

having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0320/2008),

| 1. | Approves the conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Tajikistan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Tajikistan.

---
#### § 2540.660 If the final decision determines that I received a financial benefit improperly, will I be required to repay that benefit?

If it is determined that you received a financial benefit improperly, you may be required to reimburse the program for that benefit.
###### Editorial Note on Part 85

#### Editorial Note:

At the request of the Department of Health and Human Services, the “Section-by-Section Analysis” portion of the preamble of the document published at 53 FR 25595, July 8, 1988, as corrected at 53 FR 26559, July 13, 1988, appears at the end of part 85.

#### § 85.12 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such a manner as the agency head finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this part.
§ 260.32 What does the term “WtW cash assistance” mean? ( a ) For the purpose of § 264.1(b)(1)(iii) of this chapter, WtW cash assistance only includes benefits that: ( 1 ) Meet the definition of assistance at § 260.31; and
( 2 ) Are directed at basic needs.
( b ) Thus, it includes benefits described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of § 260.31, but excludes benefits described in paragraph (a)(3) of § 260.31.
( c ) It only includes benefits identified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section when they are provided in the form of cash payments, checks, reimbursements, electronic funds transfers, or any other form that can legally be converted to currency.
#### § 91.16 Affirmative action by recipient.

Even in the absence of a finding of discrimination, a recipient may take affirmative action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipient's program or activity on the basis of age.
§ 263.22 Are there any restrictions on IDA funds? The following restrictions apply to IDA funds: ( a ) A recipient may deposit only earned income into an IDA.
( b ) A recipient's contributions to an IDA may be matched by, or through, a qualified entity.
( c ) A recipient may withdraw funds only for the following reasons: ( 1 ) To cover post-secondary education expenses, if the amount is paid directly to an eligible educational institution;
( 2 ) For the recipient to purchase a first home, if the amount is paid directly to the person to whom the amounts are due and it is a qualified acquisition cost for a qualified principal residence by a qualified first-time home buyer; or
( 3 ) For business capitalization, if the amounts are paid directly to a business capitalization account in a federally insured financial institution and used for a qualified business capitalization expense.
# AG **END A** 

**Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments**  Meeting: Taft Auditorium

Robert A. Taft Laboratories, 4676 Columbia Pkwy. , Cincinnati, OH 45226 **Thursday, February 13, 2013, 9:00 a.m. –**  **4:00 p.m.*** ***** Please note that the public meeting will end after this agenda has been completed, even if that time is before 4:00 pm. **9 :**  **0 0**  **– 9**  **: 0**  **5 a .**  **m .**  **Introductions and Description of Meeting**

**Procedures T.J. Lentz, Ph.D.**  Education and Information Division, NIOSH **9 :**  **05 –**  **9:15 a.m. Welcome and Overview**  **Paul Schulte, Ph.D.** Director, Education and Information Division, NIOSH **9:15 –**  **9:45 a**  **. m**  **. Presentation on the Background and Key** 

**Points of the Draft NIOSH Criteria for a**  **Recommended Standard Brenda Jacklitsch, M.S.**  Educ ation and Information Division, NIOSH **9:45 –**  **10:00 a.m. Questions/Answers of Clarification for the** 

**Previous Presentation Audience/NIOSH Panelists**  **10:00 –**  **10:15 a.m. Break**  **10:15 a.m.**  **Public Opportunities to Provide Comment**  **Sammy Almashat (Public Citizen)**  **1 2:00**  **– 1**  **: 00**  **p .**  **m .**  **Break for Lunch (**  **if ne cessary)**  **1 :**  **0 0 p**  **. m**  **. Additional Public Opportunities to Provide Comment**  **(if necessary) (following the last**  **public comment) Additional Questions/Answers of Clarification**  **Paul Schulte, Ph.D. and NIOSH**  **Panelists Prior to 4:00 p.m.**  **Concluding Remarks, Summary of Next Steps,**

**and Adjournment T.J. Lentz, Ph.D.**  **NOTE:** For **remote participation via teleconference** , those who have registered with the NIOSH Docket Office (niocindocket@cdc.gov ) should use the following dial

-in number and passcode. Teleconference participants will be muted to avoid distractions during presentations, and then unmuted periodically to allow opportunities for questions or comment. This teleco nference number may not guarantee access for international callers. **Dial -**  **in number: 877**  **- 664** **- 7856** 

**Passcode: 9670230**  **Post Meeting ADDENDUM: The public meeting started at 9:00 a.m. and ended at approximately 10:00 a.m. Those unable to call in or attend in person had the**  **opportunity to submit public comments through the NIOSH Docket or regulations.gov through February 25, 2014.**
IN THE UNITED ;STATES DISTRICT ;COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 

FEDERAL ELECTION·COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

'V .• ,C.A. No.J5-17-LPS 

CHRISTINE O'DONNELL, et al.., 

·Defendants. 

ORDER 

At Wilmington this -19th day of April, .2017, consistent .with and for the Teasons stated in 

the Memorandum·Opiriion issued this same date, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. O'Donnell shall disgorge $4,620 to the U.S. Department of the Treasury as well 

as '$1,081.85 for pre-judgment interest. 

2. Defendants jointly shall pay a civil penalty of $25,000 to the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury. 

3. Defendants are hereby ENJOINED from converting campaign contributions to 

personal use. 

HON. LEONARD P. STARK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00017-LPS Document 75 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1094
§ 681.42 Can the administrative complaint be settled voluntarily? ( a ) Parties may make offers of compromise or settlement at any time. Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.
( b ) The reviewing official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle the case from the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to issue a complaint until the ALJ issues an initial decision.
( c ) The authority head has exclusive authority to compromise or settle the case from the date of the ALJ's initial decision until initiation of any judicial review or any action to collect the penalties and assessments.
( d ) The Attorney General has exclusive authority to compromise or settle the case while any judicial review or any action to recover penalties and assessments is pending.
( e ) The investigating official may recommend settlement terms to the reviewing official, the authority head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate.
§ 900.304 Actions resulting from assessment. ( a ) *Accepted without modification.* The Commission may accept a proposal without modifications if the EA indicates that the proposal does not have significant environmental impacts and a FONSI is prepared in accordance with § 900.305.
( b ) *Accepted with modification.* If an EA identifies potentially significant environmental impacts, the proposal may be modified to eliminate such impacts. Proposals so modified may be accepted by the Commission if the proposed changes are evaluated in an EA and a FONSI is prepared in accordance with § 900.305.
( c ) *Mitigated FONSI.* If mitigation is required to reduce the impacts below significant the FONSI shall identify the mitigation and describe applicable monitoring and enforcement measures intended to ensure the implementation of the mitigation measures.
( d ) *Prepare an EIS.* The Commission shall require that the proposal be evaluated in an EIS, prepared in accordance with subpart D to this part, if the EA indicates significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated below a specified level of significance.
( e ) *Rejected.* The Commission may always elect to reject a proposal.
**SERVICER
        COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)**
  **GMAC
        Mortgage, LLC**
  **SACO
        06-9**
   The
        undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
        (the
“Servicer”) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
        that:
  1.  A
        review of
        the Servicer’s activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entity’s
        report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer’s performance under the applicable
        servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.
  2.  To
        the best
        of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
        its
        obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects
        throughout such period.
  IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
        6th day
        of March 2007.
    By:
              /s/
                Anthony N. RenziName:   
                Anthony N. RenziTital:     
                Executive Vice President






GMAC
              Mortgage, LLC
            www.gmacmortgage.com500
              Enterprise RoadHorsham,
              PA 19044
#### Equitable Securities Company of New York *v.*Matthews.

Argued March 2,

Decided August 13, 1906.

Ejectment. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. April 18, 1905.

*G. B. Filis*and *B. L.*Maynard, for plaintiff.

*F. T.*Hickey, for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

This is a suit in ejectment, and the plaintiff claims under certain deeds as color of title, and possession thereunder for a period of time sufficient to raise a presumption of title by prescription. While the evidence on the question of possession was somewhat confusing, and tended to show such possession in the defendant as would defeat a prescription in favor of the plaintiff, nevertheless it was sufficient to carry the case to the jury; and it was erroneous for the court to grant a nonsuit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
#### § 690.113 Suspension or termination of IRB approval of research.

An IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the department or agency head.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
```

[Federal Register: January 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 17)]
[Notices]               
[Page 4356]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27ja10-55]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing.
    The staff will brief the Commission on various compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 19, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-1336 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
```
#### § 108.141 Boundary bulkheads and decks between the emergency power source and service generators.

Each boundary bulkhead and deck of a space containing an emergency electric power source or components of an emergency electric power source that adjoins a space containing a ship's service generator, the components of a ship's service generator, or a classified space must be an A-60 bulkhead and A-60 deck.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Power Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/Afor the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Hardin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Dated: April 29, 2008

/s/ Randy HardinRandy HardinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 182 

To provide discretionary authority to an immigration judge to determine 

that an alien parent of a United States citizen child should not be 

ordered removed, deported, or excluded from the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide discretionary authority to an immigration judge 

to determine that an alien parent of a United States 

citizen child should not be ordered removed, deported, 

or excluded from the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT 

4 TO REMOVAL, DEPORTATION, OR EXCLUSION 

5 OF PARENTS OF CITIZEN CHILDREN. 

6 Section 240(c)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(4)) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 182 IH

1 ‘‘(D) DISCRETION OF JUDGE IN CASE OF

2 CITIZEN CHILD.—In the case of an alien subject 

3 to removal, deportation, or exclusion who is the 

4 parent of a child who is a citizen of the United 

5 States, the immigration judge may exercise dis6 cretion to decline to order the alien removed, 

7 deported or excluded from the United States if 

8 the judge determines that such removal, depor9 tation, or exclusion is clearly against the best 

10 interests of the child, except that this subpara11 graph shall not apply to any alien who the 

12 judge determines— 

13 ‘‘(i) is described in section 212(a)(3) 

14 or 237(a)(4); or 

15 ‘‘(ii) has engaged in conduct described 

16 in paragraph (8) or (9) of section 103 of 

17 the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

18 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102).’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 2550.10 What is the purpose of this part? ( a ) The Corporation for National and Community Service (the Corporation) seeks to meet the Nation's pressing human, educational, environmental and public safety needs through service and to reinvigorate the ethic of civic responsibility across the Nation. If the Corporation is to meet these goals, it is critical for each of the States to be actively involved.
( b ) To be eligible to apply for program funding, or approved national service positions, each State must establish a State commission on national and community service to administer the State program grant making process and to develop a State plan. The Corporation may, in some instances, approve an alternative administrative entity (AAE).
( c ) The Corporation will distribute grants of between $125,000 and $750,000 to States to cover the Federal share of operating the State commissions or AAEs.
( d ) The purpose of this part is to provide States with the basic information essential to participate in the subtitle C programs. Of equal importance, this part gives an explanation of the preliminary steps States must take in order to receive money from the Corporation. This part also offers guidance on which of the two State entities States should seek to establish, and it explains the composition requirements, duties, responsibilities, restrictions, and other relevant information for State commissions and AAEs.
[58 FR 60981, Nov. 18, 1993, as amended at 67 FR 45362, July 9, 2002; 70 FR 39607, July 8, 2005]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 71585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9647]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 2006.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

    1. National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) Operating 
Level for 2007.
    2. Final Rule: Part 708a of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Conversion of Insured Credit Unions to Mutual Savings Banks.
    3. Final Rule: Part 703 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Permissible Investments for Federal Credit Unions.

RECESS: 11:15 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 2006.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

    1. One (1) Insurance Claim. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 06-9647 Filed 12-7-06; 3:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
§ 75.461 Publication and printing costs. ( a ) Publication costs for electronic and print media, including distribution, promotion, and general handling are allowable. If these costs are not identifiable with a particular cost objective, they should be allocated as indirect costs to all benefiting activities of the non-Federal entity.
( b ) Page charges for professional journal publications are allowable where: ( 1 ) The publications report work supported by the Federal Government; and
( 2 ) The charges are levied impartially on all items published by the journal, whether or not under a Federal award.
( 3 ) The non-Federal entity may charge the Federal award before closeout for the costs of publication or sharing of research results if the costs are not incurred during the period of performance of the Federal award.
( c ) The non-Federal entity may charge the Federal award before closeout for the costs of publication as prescribed in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section or sharing of research results if the costs are not incurred during the period of performance of the Federal award.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3018, Jan. 20, 2016]
OoT-Gsr- iq'^^-s=?^S' 

LARAMIE REGIONAL AIRPORT 

555 General Brees Road • Laramie, Wyoming 82070 • Office: (307) 742-4164 • FAX: 742-3303 • skinner@laramieairport.com 

July 19.2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVaiiy 

F.ssential Air Ser\ ice Division 

Office of Aviation Anai>sis 

U.S. Department of Iransportation 

1200 New Jersev Avenue. S.F.. 

Washington D.C. 205Q0 

RF: [JS DO! Fssential Air Service Bid.s for Laramie, Wyoming 

Dear Mr, DeVany: 

After reviewing the proposals from CJreat Lakes Aviation and Sovereign Air to provide essential air 

service to Laramie. Wyoming it is the Laramie Regional Airport's desire to support the Great Lakes 

Aviation proposal. Though we are not pleased with the current service we are receiving from Great 

Lakes, we feel their proposal provides members of the Laramie community with the best option to 

connect to the nation's air transportation .system. 

In the past. Laramie has demonstrated the need for scheduled air service. Area travelers have supported 

Laramie air senicc when the airline offered three to four flights per day that were well spaced throughout 

the day. nonstop to Denver, and reliable. Great Lakes reliabilit) has dropped oIT in the last year and a 

half and the flving public has suffered and many travelers have lost confidence in Great Lakes ability to 

provide qualit> service. The community and [.araniie Regional Airport arc vvilling to work with Great 

Lakes to rebuild public confidence in the air service at Laramie. 

Quality air service is very important to our community. Not only does it provide quality of life to the 

citizens of Laramie, but also is a great tool in recruiting new businesses and also is an important tool for 

the University of Wyoming, 

Thank you for considering our comments. 

Sincerely, ^ 

k Skinner 

Airport Manager 

Laramie Regional Airport