alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 10.301 General requirements. ( a ) The Coast Guard will issue a medical certificate to a mariner meeting the medical and physical standards for merchant mariners. The medical certificate will be issued for various periods of time based upon the endorsements the mariner holds. The Coast Guard will review all information provided and will determine whether— ( 1 ) The applicant is physically and medically qualified for the medical certificate without any limitations, waivers and/or other conditions;
( 2 ) The applicant is physically and medically qualified for the medical certificate with limitations and/or other conditions as specified by the Coast Guard;
( 3 ) For an applicant who does not possess the vision, hearing, or general physical condition necessary, a medical certificate may be issued with appropriate limitations, waivers and/or other conditions as specified by the Coast Guard;
( 4 ) Additional information is necessary to determine if the applicant is physically and/or medically qualified for the medical certificate. The Coast Guard will request additional information from the applicant. The Coast Guard may hold the package pending receipt of that information before the package and/or application is denied; or
( 5 ) The applicant is not physically and/or medically qualified for the medical certificate. The application for a medical certificate will be denied by the Coast Guard.
( b ) Except as otherwise noted, medical certificates will be issued for the following periods of time: ( 1 ) All persons employed or engaged onboard vessels to which STCW applies will be issued a medical certificate valid for 2 years unless the mariner is under the age of 18, in which case the maximum period of validity will be 1 year.
( 2 ) Medical certificates issued to all other mariners will be issued for a maximum period of 5 years.
( c ) Applicants seeking additional MMC endorsements holding a current medical certificate are not required to submit a new medical physical exam if their existing medical certification meets all of the requirements of this section for the endorsement sought.
( d ) Applicants holding no endorsement other than a staff officer endorsement need not meet the medical and physical requirements of this section.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77900, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2020-0069, 87 FR 66590, Nov. 4, 2022]
IB 

Union Calendar No. 89 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1752 

[Report No. 111–173] 

To provide that the usual day for paying salaries in or under the House 

of Representatives may be established by regulations of the Committee 

on House Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To provide that the usual day for paying salaries in or 

under the House of Representatives may be established 

by regulations of the Committee on House Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1752 RH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMIN2 ISTRATION TO ESTABLISH DAY FOR PAYING 

3 SALARIES IN OR UNDER THE HOUSE OF REP4 RESENTATIVES. 

5 Section 116(a) of the Legislative Branch Appropria6 tions Act, 2002 (2 U.S.C. 60d–1) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Notwithstanding 

8 the previous sentence, the Committee on House Adminis9 tration may by regulation provide for the payment of sala10 ries with respect to a month on a date other than the date 

11 provided under the previous sentence as may be necessary 

12 to conform to generally accepted accounting practices.’’. 

13 SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES EX14 ERCISE FACILITY FOR ACTIVE DUTY ARMED 

15 FORCES MEMBERS ASSIGNED TO CONGRES16 SIONAL LIAISON OFFICE. 

17 House Resolution 1068, One Hundred Tenth Congress, 

18 agreed to April 15, 2008, is enacted into law. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to provide that 

the usual day for paying salaries in or under the House 

of Representatives may be established by regulations of 

the Committee on House Administration, and for other 

purposes.’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 89 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1752 

[Report No. 111–173] 

A BILL 

To provide that the usual day for paying salaries 

House Administration. established by regulations of the Committee on in or under the House of Representatives may be 

JUNE 19, 2009 

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee 

dered to be printed of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and orVerDate Nov 24 2008 21:19 Jun 19, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6651 Sfmt 6651 E:\BILLS\H1752.RH H1752

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
§ 2554.10 When will the Corporation issue a complaint? The Corporation will issue a complaint: ( a ) If the Attorney General (or designee) approves the referral of the allegations for adjudication; and
( b ) In a case of submission of false claims, if the amount of money or the value of property or services demanded or requested in a false claim, or a group of related claims submitted at the same time, does not exceed $150,000. “A group of related claims submitted at the same time” includes only those claims arising from the same transaction (such as a grant, loan, application, or contract) which are submitted together as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
June 30, 2015

Mr. Jason Gadrim

19733 State Route 278 SW

Nelsonville, OH 45764

Dear Mr. Gadrim:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 25, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0763), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 10.15

 



 

March 15, 2019

 

Dear      :

 

I am very pleased to share that you will participate in the Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) Cost Savings Achievement Plan.

 

The cost savings incentive earned will be based on the achievement of specified levels of cost savings achieved beginning February 8, 2019. Cost savings are defined as the annualized net expense savings from specific actions taken by management. The Board of Directors (or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors) has final authority to determine whether a specific amount will qualify as a cost savings. No incentive bonus will be earned until the annualized cost savings amount reaches $75 million. Your target incentive at various total cost savings levels are as follows (subject to the provisions below). If the cost savings achieved are between levels in the table below, your target incentive amount will be interpolated.

 

	
Total Cost Savings
    	
 
    	
Target Incentive Amount
    	
 
    
	
$
    	
100 million
    	
 
    	
$
    	
xxx,xxx
    	
 
    
	
$
    	
125 million
    	
 
    	
$
    	
xxx,xxx
    	
 
    
	
$
    	
200 million
    	
 
    	
$
    	
xxx,xxx
    	
 
    
	
$
    	
250 million
    	
 
    	
$
    	
xxx,xxx
    	
 
    


 

50% of your target incentive amount will be paid based on the cost savings achieved, and 50% will be paid at the discretion of D&B’s CEO and President based on your contributions to the success of the Cost Savings Achievement Plan. Payouts are contingent upon your continued employment.

 

The payout schedule is as follows:

 

·       Q1 2020: 100% of your target incentive paid based on 2019 cost savings achieved (50% based on cost savings achievement and 50% paid at the discretion of the CEO and President based upon your contribution to the cost savings achievement)

·       Q2 2020: 50% of your target incentive paid based on Q1 2020 cost savings achieved, with the remaining 50% paid out 1 year later at the discretion of the CEO and President based upon your contribution to the cost savings achievement

·       Q3 2020: 50% of your target incentive paid based on Q2 2020 cost savings achieved, with the remaining 50% paid out 1 year later at the discretion of the CEO and President based upon your contribution to the cost savings achievement

 

The quarterly payout pattern modeled in Q2 2020 and Q3 2020 will continue until the end of the Cost Savings Achievement Plan, which is determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors (or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors).

 

Congratulations on being a part of this critical program. You are among a small group of executives who have the greatest impact on the performance of D&B. We are counting on you to drive organizational performance. Thank you for your dedication to D&B.

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Anthony Jabbour
    	
Stephen C.   Daffron
    
	
Chief Executive   Officer
    	
President
Exhibit 4.1



NetEase, Inc.   (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands) Number Shares Share   Capital is US$100,030,000 divided into 1,000,300,000,000 Shares of a par   value of US$0.0001 each THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT is the registered holder of   Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of   Association thereof . EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on by:   DIRECTOR
June 1, 1999



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 07036

Attention:  Ms. Theresa Morris

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II

Dear Ms. Morris:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 2000
and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reach at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
# CE2009041EN.01010301.xml

| 19.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 41/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 41/103

---

P6_TA(2008)0006

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 January 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (COM(2007)0159 — C6-0104/2007 — 2007/0054(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0159), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0159),

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 42 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0104/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 42 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0104/2007),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A6-0515/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A6-0515/2007),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2007)0054

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 15 January 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 592/2008.)

---
No. 12478 INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1973

RONAN STATE BANK, a Montana Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent,
-VS

# - MARY M. JEWETT, formerly MARY M. SHEPHARD, Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from: District Court of theFourth JudicialDistrict. Hon. 

### E. Gardner Brownlee, Judge presiding.
Counsel of Record: For Appellant: Richard Heinz argued, Polson, Montana For Respondent : Christiansen, McCurdy, Ingraham & Wold, Polson,

Montana Frank L. Ingraham argued, Polson, Montana

Submitted: May 31, 1973 Decided:

## JUN

## 20

## i j:JMr. Justice John Conway Harrison delivered the Opinion of the Court, This 

### is an appeal from an order of the district court of the fourthjudicial district, county of Lake, Hon. E. Gardner Brownlee, judge presiding, granting a defaultjudgment against
an enrolled Indian, Mary M. Jewett. This 

### is a companion case to Security StateBank v. Pierre, Cause No. 8155, Lake County, which because of the similar fact situationwas consolidated for hearing purposes atthe 

### time Judge Brownlee heard Pierre. At the time set for hearing Pierre in this Court inDecember 1972, counsel for appellant Jewett appeared and argued although no appeal had been taken by Jewett following Judge Brownlee's order granting a defaultjudgment against her, On February 

### 7, 1973, this Court issued an opinion in the
case of Security StateBank v, Pierre, reversing the order of the district court in Pierre. Due to 

### a factual error concerning the appellate status of the instant case discovered after the remittitur had gone down inPierre, the Court recalled the remittitur and set both cases for rehearing, After the recall order had issued, both respondent StateBank of Ronan and appellant &ry 

### M. Jewett filedwith this Court a stipulationexpressly waiving any defects inthe failure to filethe notice of appeal and in the perfection of such appeal in the instant case. It was revealed that inthe instant case Ronan State Bank had first attempted tobring 

### its action inthe Flathead Tribal Court, but appellant 

### Jewett refused topermit the action. The actionwas then brought inthe district court. In thisCourt's original opinion inPierre it had been assumed that the parties had not attempted tobring action in the Tribal Court. Since that timethe Tribal 

### Law and Order Code has been amended to allow such actions inTribal Court.

### On March 19, 1973, the clerk of this Court received a notice oi

### appeal, dated March 16, 1973, from counsel for appellant Jewett. Both cases, Pierre and Jewett,were reargued by counsel on 

## my 31, 1973. In the instant case, it is now fully established and admitted by appellant's counsel that no timely appealwas taken by appellant Jewett, Therebeing no appeal before this Court, the cause is dismissed. 

### n

Associate Justices 4 

## 1

\. IcIll- (C { tI.?,.L.-" 

# ............................... Hon. Bernard Thomas, District Judge, sitting for Justice Wesley Castles.
July 22, 2013

Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20591.

# ~ 

# :
..**~** """ Il!!II 

### i

...



# .,."

Chandler. Arizona W7.!ere Values Make The Difference

# ~~~lE.fi'W~~ /:lUG 1\) 20\3

# PARI16~E1S

RE: Part 16 Complaint Chandler Air Service v. City ofChandler Municipal Airport


### To Whom it May Concern: enandlerAir Service filed a Part 16 complaint against the City ofChandler on or about July 1, 2013. I "anted to make sure that the FAA's docketing notice or a copy ofit is sent to me as the attorney for the efty ofChandler ifthe FAA decides to address the complaint. My direct contact information is provided below my name. Please feel free to contact me with questions or comments. Sincerely, , /I '

# ~r~~7cgehL--J Kay Bigelow Acting Chandler City Attorney Post Office Box 4008, MS 602 Chandler, Arizona 85244-4008 Telephone: 480-782-4640 Fax: 480-782-4652 Email: Kay.Bigelow@chandleraz.gov

MailingAddr,,, Mail Stop 602 PO Box 41108 Chandler, Arizona 85244-4008

Printed on rrycled paper '0 Office of the CityAttorney Tdeph,., (480) 782-464ll

Fax (480) 782-4652 Web www.chandleraz.gov Location Suite 202 55 North Arizona Place Chandler, Arizona 85225
§ 91.13 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination: Normal operation or statutory objective of any program or activity. A recipient is permitted to take an action, otherwise prohibited by § 91.11, if the action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity. An action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity, if: ( a ) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other characteristics; and
( b ) The other characteristic(s) must be measured or approximated in order for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue, or to achieve any statutory objective of the program or activity; and
( c ) The other characteristic(s) can be reasonably measured or approximated by the use of age; and
( d ) The other characteristic(s) are impractical to measure directly on an individual basis.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**WILLIAM LOGUE,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (COMMONWEALTH OF** 

**PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION),** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 548 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-082
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

    The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., and its officers and agents

Date:  September 10, 2007


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum

Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior officer in charge of securitization
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor