alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 650.13 Exercise of march-in rights. ( a ) The procedures established by this section supplement those prescribed by § 401.6 of the implementing regulation for the Bayh-Dole Act (37 CFR § 401.6) and apply to all march-in rights held by NSF including those resulting from funding agreements not covered by the Bayh-Dole Act.
( b ) Petitions requesting that the NSF exercise a march-in right should be addressed to the NSF Patent Assistant. Such petitions should: ( 1 ) Identify the patent or patent application involved and the relevant fields of use of the invention;
( 2 ) State the grounds for the proposed march-in;
( 3 ) Supply evidence that one or more of the four conditions creating a march-in right (lack of practical application, unsatisfied health or safety needs, unmet requirements for public use, or failure to prefer United States industry) is present; and
( 4 ) Explain what action by the Foundation is necessary to correct that condition.
( c ) If evidence received from a petitioner or from the Foundation's administration of the Patent Rights clause indicates that one or more of the four conditions creating a march-in right might exist, the NSF Patent Assistant will informally review the matter as provided in § 401.6(b) of the implementing regulation. If that informal review indicates that one or more of the four conditions creating a march-in right probably exists, the Patent Assistant will initiate a formal march-in proceeding by issuing a written notice to the patent holder. That notice will provide all the information required by § 401.6(c) of the implementing regulation. The patent holder may submit information and argument in opposition to the proposed march-in in person, in writing, or through a representative.
( d ) If the NSF Patent Assistant determines that a genuine dispute over material facts exists, he or she will identify the disputed facts and notify the NSF General Counsel. The General Counsel will create a cross-directorate fact-finding panel, which will establish its own fact-finding procedures within the requirements of § 401.6(e) of the implementing regulation based on the dimensions of the particular dispute. The Patent Assistant will serve as secretary to the panel, but will not take part in its deliberations. Written findings of facts will be submitted to the General Counsel, sent by certified mail to the patent holder, and made available to all other interested parties.
( e ) The NSF General Counsel will determine whether and how the Foundation should exercise a march-in right as provided in § 401.6(g) of the implementing regulation.
#### § 75.458 Pre-award costs.

Pre-award costs are those incurred prior to the effective date of the Federal award directly pursuant to the negotiation and in anticipation of the Federal award where such costs are necessary for efficient and timely performance of the scope of work. Such costs are allowable only to the extent that they would have been allowable if incurred after the date of the Federal award and only with the written approval of the HHS awarding agency.
§ 95.13 In which quarter we consider an expenditure made. In this subpart— ( a ) We consider a State agency's expenditure for assistance payments under title I, IV-A, IV-E, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) to have been made in the quarter in which a payment was made to the assistance recipient, his or her protective payee, or a vendor payee, even if the payment was for a month in a previous quarter.
( b ) We consider a State agency's expenditure for services under title I, IV-A, IV-B, IV-D, IV-E, X, XIV, XVI (AABD) , XIX, or XXI to have been made in the quarter in which any State agency made a payment to the service provider.
( c ) For purposes of title XX, the date of expenditure is governed by 45 CFR 1396.52(d).
( d ) We consider a State agency's expenditure for administration or training under titles I, IV-A, IV-B, IV-D, IV-E, X, XIV, XVI (AABD), XIX, or XXI to have been made in the quarter payment was made by a State agency to a private agency or individual; or in the quarter to which the costs were allocated in accordance with the regulations for each program. We consider a State agency's expenditure under these titles for non-cash expenditures such as depreciation to have been made in the quarter the expenditure was recorded in the accounting records of any State agency in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
[46 FR 3529, Jan. 15, 1981, as amended at 65 FR 33632, May 24, 2000]
#### § 1177.25 Further review of compromise offers.

If NEH is uncertain whether to accept a firm, written, substantive compromise offer on a debt that is within the agency's delegated compromise authority, it may refer the offer to the Civil Division or other appropriate litigating division in DOJ, using a CCLR accompanied by supporting data and particulars concerning the debt. DOJ may act upon such an offer or return it to NEH with instructions or advice.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis panel, Minority Biomedical Research 
Support.
    Date: March 30, 2007.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, PhD, Office of Scientific Review, 
National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes 
of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-
3907. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc8c95979e8ebc919d9590d2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3141585a5343715c50585d1f5f58591f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 7, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1189 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-07-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1012]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE


Depository Library Council to the Public Printer Meeting

    The Depository Library Council to the Public Printer (DLC) will 
meet on Sunday, April 15, 2007, through Wednesday, April 18, 2007 in 
Denver, Colorado. The sessions will take place from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 
Sunday through Tuesday, and 8 a.m. to 12 noon on Wednesday. The meeting 
will be held at the Adam's Mark Hotel, 1550 Court Place, Denver, 
Colorado. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Federal 
Depository Library Program. All sessions are open to the public. The 
sleeping rooms available at the Adam's Mark Hotel will be at the 
Government rate of $127.00 (plus applicable state and local taxes, 
currently 14.85%) a night for a single or double. The Adam's Mark Hotel 
is in compliance with the requirements of Title III of the Americans 
with Disabilities Act and meets all Fire Safety Act regulations.

William H. Turri,
Acting, Public Printer of the United States.
[FR Doc. 07-1012 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1520-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12611-12612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1306]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
2 p.m. on Tuesday, March 20, 2007, to consider the following matters:
    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is 
anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a 
member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the 
discussion agenda.
    Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' meetings.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

[[Page 12612]]

    Memorandum and resolution re: Expanded Exam Cycle for Certain Small 
Insured Depository Institutions and U.S. Branches and Agencies of 
Foreign Banks.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Final Rule on Standards of 
Ethical Conduct for FDIC Employees Regarding Extensions of Credit, 
Securities Ownership, and Definitions.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Interagency Proposal for Model 
Privacy Notice Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or TTY), to 
make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

    Dated: March 13, 2007.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-1306 Filed 3-13-07; 4:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
§ 800.405 Reconsideration of compliance actions. ( a ) *Right to request reconsideration.* An MSP issuer may request that OPM reconsider a determination to impose one of the following compliance actions: ( 1 ) Withdrawal of the certification of the MSP option or options offered on one or more Exchanges;
( 2 ) Nonrenewal of participation
( 3 ) Nonrenewal of contract; or
( 4 ) Termination of the MSP Program contract.
( b ) *Request for reconsideration and/or hearing.* ( 1 ) An MSP issuer with a right to request reconsideration specified in paragraph (a) of this section may request a hearing in which OPM will reconsider its determination to impose a compliance action.
( 2 ) A request under this section must be in writing and contain contact information, including the name, telephone number, email address, and mailing address of the person or persons whom OPM may contact regarding a request for a hearing with respect to the reconsideration. The request must be in such form, contain such information, and be submitted in such manner as OPM may prescribe.
( 3 ) The request must be received by OPM within 15 calendar days after the date of the MSP issuer's receipt of the notice of compliance action. The MSP issuer may request that OPM's reconsideration allow a representative of the MSP issuer to appear personally before OPM.
( 4 ) A request under this section must include a detailed statement of the reasons that the MSP issuer disagrees with OPM's imposition of the compliance action, and may include any additional information that will assist OPM in rendering a final decision under this section.
( 5 ) OPM may obtain additional information relevant to the request from any source as it may, in its judgment, deem necessary. OPM will provide the MSP issuer with a copy of any additional information it obtains and provide an opportunity for the MSP issuer to respond (including by submitting additional information or explanation).
( 6 ) OPM's reconsideration and hearing, if requested, may be conducted by the Director or a representative designated by the Director who did not participate in the initial decision that is the subject of the request for review.
( c ) *Notice of final decision.* OPM will notify the MSP issuer, in writing, of OPM's final decision on the MSP issuer's request for reconsideration and the specific reasons for that final decision. OPM's written decision will constitute final agency action that is subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act in the appropriate U.S. district court. Such review is limited to the record that was before OPM when it made its decision.
EXHIBIT
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As
Adopted Pursuant to





Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael D. Michie, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      March 5, 2010
            /s/
      Michael D. MichieMichael
      D. MichieChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      accounting officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# CE2009294EN.01009801.xml

| 3.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 294/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 294/98

---

Tuesday 8 July 2008Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context *

P6_TA(2008)0320

European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 July 2008 on the proposal for a Council decision on the approval on behalf of the European Community of the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (COM(2008)0132 — C6-0161/2008 — 2008/0052(CNS))

2009/C 294 E/29

(Consultation Procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2008)0132),

having regard to the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context,

having regard to Article 175(1) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0161/2008),

having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0221/2008),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

---
§ 75.434 Contributions and donations. ( a ) Costs of contributions and donations, including cash, property, and services, from the non-Federal entity to other entities, are unallowable.
( b ) The value of services and property donated to the non-Federal entity may not be charged to the Federal award either as a direct or indirect (F&A) cost. The value of donated services and property may be used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements (see § 75.306). Depreciation on donated assets is permitted in accordance with § 75.436, as long as the donated property is not counted towards cost sharing or matching requirements.
( c ) Services donated or volunteered to the non-Federal entity may be furnished to a non-Federal entity by professional and technical personnel, consultants, and other skilled and unskilled labor. The value of these services may not be charged to the Federal award either as a direct or indirect cost. However, the value of donated services may be used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements in accordance with the provisions of § 75.306.
( d ) To the extent feasible, services donated to the non-Federal entity will be supported by the same methods used to support the allocability of regular personnel services.
( e ) The following provisions apply to nonprofit organizations. The value of services donated to the nonprofit organization utilized in the performance of a direct cost activity must be considered in the determination of the non-Federal entity's indirect cost rate(s) and, accordingly, must be allocated a proportionate share of applicable indirect costs when the following circumstances exist: ( 1 ) The aggregate value of the services is material;
( 2 ) The services are supported by a significant amount of the indirect costs incurred by the non-Federal entity; ( i ) In those instances where there is no basis for determining the fair market value of the services rendered, the non-Federal entity and the cognizant agency for indirect costs must negotiate an appropriate allocation of indirect cost to the services.
( ii ) Where donated services directly benefit a project supported by the Federal award, the indirect costs allocated to the services will be considered as a part of the total costs of the project. Such indirect costs may be reimbursed under the Federal award or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements.
( f ) Fair market value of donated services must be computed as described in § 75.306.
( g ) *Personal property and use of space.* ( 1 ) Donated personal property and use of space may be furnished to a non-Federal entity. The value of the personal property and space may not be charged to the Federal award either as a direct or indirect cost.
( 2 ) The value of the donations may be used to meet cost sharing or matching share requirements under the conditions described in §§ 75.300 through 75.309 of subpart D of this part. The value of the donations must be determined in accordance with §§ 75.300 through 75.309. Where donations are treated as indirect costs, indirect cost rates will separate the value of the donations so that reimbursement will not be made.
PUBLIC LAW 112–51—NOV. 9, 2011 125 STAT. 545 

Public Law 112–51 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and improve certain provisions 

relating to the removal of litigation against Federal officers or agencies to Federal 

courts, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removal Clarification Act of 

2011’’. 

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LITIGATION TO FEDERAL COURTS. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF INCLUSION OF CERTAIN TYPES OF PROCEEDINGS.—Section 1442 of title 28, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘that is’’ after ‘‘or criminal prosecution’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘and that is’’ after ‘‘in a State court’’; 

and 

(C) by inserting ‘‘or directed to’’ after ‘‘against’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(c) As used in subsection (a), the terms ‘civil action’ and 

‘criminal prosecution’ include any proceeding (whether or not 

ancillary to another proceeding) to the extent that in such proceeding a judicial order, including a subpoena for testimony or 

documents, is sought or issued. If removal is sought for a proceeding 

described in the previous sentence, and there is no other basis 

for removal, only that proceeding may be removed to the district 

court.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1442(a) of title 28, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘capacity for’’ and inserting ‘‘capacity, 

for or relating to’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘sued’’; and 

(2) in each of paragraphs (3) and (4), by inserting ‘‘or 

relating to’’ after ‘‘for’’. 

(c) APPLICATION OF TIMING REQUIREMENT.—Section 1446 of 

title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

the following: 

‘‘(g) Where the civil action or criminal prosecution that is removable under section 1442(a) is a proceeding in which a judicial 

order for testimony or documents is sought or issued or sought 

28 USC 1 note. 

Removal 

Clarification Act 

of 2011. 

Nov. 9, 2011 

[H.R. 368] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
125 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 112–51—NOV. 9, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 368: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–17, Pt. 1 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Feb. 28, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 31, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

to be enforced, the 30-day requirement of subsections (b) and (c) 

is satisfied if the person or entity desiring to remove the proceeding 

files the notice of removal not later than 30 days after receiving, 

through service, notice of any such proceeding.’’. 

(d) REVIEWABILITY ON APPEAL.—Section 1447(d) of title 28, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘1442 or’’ before 

‘‘1443’’. 

Approved November 9, 2011. 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 900.302 General considerations in preparing environmental assessments. ( a ) *Adoption of an EA.* The Commission may adopt an EA prepared for a proposal before the Commission by another agency or an applicant when the EA, or a portion thereof, addresses the proposed Commission action and meets the standards for an adequate analysis under this part and relevant provisions of 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, provided that the Commission makes its own evaluation of the environmental issues and takes responsibility for the scope and content of the EA in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(b).
( b ) *Incorporation by reference into the EA.* Any document may be incorporated by reference in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.21 and used in preparing an EA in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.4(e) and 1506.5(a), provided that the Commission makes its own evaluation of the environmental issues and takes responsibility for the scope and content of the EA in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(b).