alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The MONY Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael I. Roth, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY Group Inc.



|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/s/    MICHAEL I. ROTH
|                      
|Michael I. Roth       



August 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The MONY Group Inc. and will be retained by The MONY
Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 670.28 Content of permit application. In addition to the information required in subpart C of this part, an applicant seeking a permit to enter an Antarctic Specially Protected Area shall include the following in the application: ( a ) A detailed justification of the need for such entry, including a discussion of alternatives;
( b ) Information demonstrating that the proposed action will not jeopardize the unique natural ecological system in that area; and
( c ) Where a management plan exists, information demonstrating the consistency of the proposed actions with the management plan.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7914

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FEMI FAMOSA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-03-517; CA-04-1185)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Femi Famosa, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Charles Erickson, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Femi Famosa seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a proceeding

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Famosa has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH VAN AMERICAN CAPITAL, LTD. 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-23-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,124
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,715
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,215)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,861
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,639)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 670.36 Specific issuance criteria. ( a ) For purposes consistent with the Act, only the following species may be considered for a permit allowing their introduction into Antarctica: ( 1 ) Cultivated plants and their reproductive propagules for controlled use; and
( 2 ) Species of living organisms including viruses, bacteria, yeasts, and fungi, for controlled experimental use.
( b ) Living non-indigenous species of birds shall not be introduced into Antarctica.
[86 FR 27988, May 25, 2021]
#### Mary A. Kelly, Respondent, *v.*The Brooklyn Alcatraz Asphalt Company et al., Appellants.

*Kelly*v. *Oily of New YorTc,*129 App. Div. 658, affirmed.

(Argued December 15, 1909;

decided January 4, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*E. Clyde Sherwood*and *Frank V. Johnson*for Brooklyn Alcatraz Asphalt Company, appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell*of counsel), for city of New York, appellant.

*Frederick S. Martyn, William J. Pape*and *Clarence B. Campbell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
---

Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC"), (the
"Company") for the period ended
October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we the undersigned officers of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:
December 15, 2008 | /s/    BRAD JACOBY     
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | Brad Jacoby            
|                        | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |                        
|Date:
December 15, 2008 | /s/    BRAD J. PETERS  
|                        | Brad J. Peters         
|                        | Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

t1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145161

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145161

COA: 308796

Kent CC: 08

- 005687

- FC

TERRANCE SCOTT BELCHER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-138824) and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-143909 and Registration No. 333-149262) of FBR Capital Markets Corporation of our report dated February 29, 2008 relating to the
financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|McLean, Virginia              
|February 29, 2008
SUPREME COURT.

#### The People *ex rel.*Daniel O’Brien agt. Andrew H. Green, comptroller of the city of New York.

*New York Special*Term,

*March,*1873.

Where a *crier*of the superior court of the city of New York has been appointed by the judges of that court in pursuance of section 39 of the Code, the comptroller of the city is bound to pay him his salary, notwithstanding his objection that the full number of officers allowed to be appointed to that court, under section 2, of chap. 438, of the Laws of 1872, had been appointed, and that the relator was not one of those officers. ,

The relator had been appointed by the judge of the superior court, at a general term, on the 21st day of January, 1870, crier of the superior court, and had performed the duties of his position, and was still performing the same with the consent and- approbation of the judge of said court at the time hereinafter mentioned. The comptroller had refused to pay the salary of the relator for the months of May, June, July, August, September, October, ¡November and December, 1872, and January, 1873, at $2,000 a year, the rate fixed by an act of the legislature passed April 26, 1870, although the same had been included in the estimate of expenditures transmitted to the comptroller by the clerk of the said court at the commencement of each year.

The comptroller alleged that the full number of officers allowed to .be appointed under the second section of chapter 438 of the Laws of 1872, four for each branch of the court, had been appointed, and that the relator was not one of the officers so appointed.

*151Also, that there was no appropriation out of which payment could be made for services rendered in the year 1872.

The relator moved for a writ of peremptory mandamus.

Abraham E. Lawrence, *Jr.,for relator.*

Geo. P. Andrews, *for respondent.*

Abraham E. Lawrence, Jr., *for respondent.*

David J. Dean,./»?’ *appellant.*

Fancher, J.

The crier of the superior court “ was lawfully appointed by the justices of that court, under section 39 of the Code of Procedure. His salary was lawfully fixed, and is to be paid by the county of Hew York. The mandamus applied for must be granted.”

On the return day a stay of proceedings was granted, and an appeal taken to the general term.

By consent, the appeal was argued March 22d at a *general*term, *composed of*Ingraham, *P. J..*and Davis, *J.*

At the close of the argument the court at once affirmed the order below.
MARK WILLIAMS 

COMMI SSIONER 

October 15, 2012 

Mr. James D. Giattina, Director 

.. A 

_( 1~ 

t-c( GEORGIA 

-lA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL REsOURCES 

COASTAL RESOURCES DIVISION 

US EPA Region 4 Water Protection Division 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

RE: National Consistency Determination for NPDES VGP and sVGP 

Dear Mr. Giattina: 

A.G. 'S PUD' WOODWARD 

DI RECTOR 

Staff of the Georgia Coastal Management Program has reviewed your letters, e-mails, and supporting 

documents dated between December 12, 2011 and June 25, 2012 regarding the proposed National 

Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General 

Permit (sVGP). These proposed VGP will regulate discharges incidental to the normal operation of 

commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 feet in length. The 

proposed sVGP will regulate discharges on vessels less than 79 feet in length. 

Except for ocean going vessels of 20 tons displacement or more, the Rules implementing the Georgia 

Water Quality Control Act (391-3-6-.04) require graywater to be discharged through a marine sanitation 

device that is in compliance with the federal standards of performance. Additionally, Georgia 

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or Environmental Protection Division (EPD) personnel, or other 

duly authorized agents, must be allowed access to any vessel at reasonable times for the purposes of 

determining compliance with these rules. 

The Program concurs with your consistency determination with the condition that the requirements of 

Georgia Rule 391-3-6-.04 are incorporated into the VGP and sVGP for vessels that may enter State of 

Georgia waters. You must notify us immediately if this condition is not acceptable. Should you fail to 

amend the VGP and sVGP to incorporate this condition, all parties will treat this conditional concurrence 

as an objection. Please feel free to contact Kelie Moore or me if we can be of further assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Brad Gane 

Section Chief, Ecological Services Section 

BG/km 

Cc: Gigi Steele, GaDNR/EPD 

Ref: Ol092012_0238.101512_FC 

ONE C ONSERVATION WAY I BRUN SW ICK, GEORGIA 31520-8686 

912.264.7218 I FAX 912.262.3143 I WWW.COASTALGAONR.ORG
§ 5b.7 Procedures for correction or amendment of records. ( a ) Any subject individual may request that his record be corrected or amended if he believes that the record is not accurate, timely, complete, or relevant or necessary to accomplish a Department function. A subject individual making a request to amend or correct his record shall address his request to the responsible Department official in writing; *except that,* the request need not be in writing if the subject individual makes his request in person and the responsible Department official corrects or amends the record at that time. The subject individual shall specify in each request: ( 1 ) The system of records from which the record is retrieved;
( 2 ) The particular record which he is seeking to correct or amend;
( 3 ) Whether he is seeking an addition to or a deletion or substitution of the record; and,
( 4 ) His reasons for requesting correction or amendment of the record.
( b ) A request for correction or amendment of a record will be acknowledged within 10 working days of its receipt unless the request can be processed and the subject individual informed of the responsible Department official's decision on the request within that 10 day period.
( c ) If the responsible Department official agrees that the record is not accurate, timely, or complete based on a preponderance of the evidence, the record will be corrected or amended. The record will be deleted without regard to its accuracy, if the record is not relevant or necessary to accomplish the Department function for which the record was provided or is maintained. In either case, the subject individual will be informed in writing of the correction, amendment, or deletion and, if accounting was made of prior disclosures of the record, all previous recipients of the record will be informed of the corrective action taken.
( d ) If the responsible Department official does not agree that the record should be corrected or amended, the subject individual will be informed in writing of the refusal to correct or amend the record. He will also be informed that he may appeal the refusal to correct or amend his record to the appropriate appeal authority listed in § 5b.8 of this part. The appropriate appeal authority will be identified to the subject individual by name, title, and business address.
( e ) Requests to correct or amend a record governed by the regulation of another government agency, *e.g.,* Civil Service Commission, Federal Bureau of Investigation, will be forwarded to such government agency for processing and the subject individual will be informed in writing of the referral.
§ 261.70 What safeguards are there to ensure that participants in work activities do not displace other workers? ( a ) An adult taking part in a work activity outlined in § 261.30 may not fill a vacant employment position if: ( 1 ) Another individual is on layoff from the same or any substantially equivalent job; or
( 2 ) The employer has terminated the employment of any regular employee or caused an involuntary reduction in its work force in order to fill the vacancy with an adult taking part in a work activity.
( b ) A State must establish and maintain a grievance procedure to resolve complaints of alleged violations of the displacement rule in this section.
( c ) This section does not preempt or supersede State or local laws providing greater protection for employees from displacement.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Black Hills National Forests's Crook County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Monday, February 20th, 2006 in Sundance, Wyoming for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on February 20th will begin at 6:30 p.m., at the USFS Bearlodge Ranger District office, 121 South 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming. Agenda topics will include presentation of appointments to the Crook County Resource Advisory Committee, election of officers, review of previously funded projects and examination of new project proposals. A public forum will begin at 8:30 p.m. (MT).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Kozel, Bearlodge District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer at (307) 283-1361.

Dated: January 26, 2006.

Steven J. Kozel,

District Ranger, Bearlodge Ranger District.

[FR Doc. 06-955  Filed 2-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Case 1:00-cv-02138-ESH Document 12 Filed 09/21/00 Page 1 of 1
§ 703.4 Advisory Committee Management Officer. ( a ) The Chief of the Regional Programs Coordination Unit is designated as Advisory Committee Management Officer pursuant to the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-463, as amended).
( b ) Such Officer shall carry out the functions specified in section 8(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
( c ) Such Officer shall, for each Advisory Committee, appoint a Commission employee to provide services to the Committee and to be responsible for supervising the activity of the Committee pursuant to section 8 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The employee is subject to the supervision of the Regional Director of the Commission responsible for the State within which said Committee is chartered.
§ 703.6 Officers. ( a ) The officers of each Advisory Committee shall be a Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and such other officers as may be deemed advisable.
( b ) The Chairperson shall be appointed by the Commission.
( c ) The Vice Chairperson and other officers shall be elected by the majority vote of the full membership of the Committee.
( d ) The Chairperson, or in his or her absence the Vice Chairperson, under the direction of the Commission staff member appointed pursuant to § 703.4(b) shall: ( 1 ) Call meetings of the Committee;
( 2 ) Preside over meetings of the Committee;
( 3 ) Appoint all subcommittees of the Committee;
( 4 ) Certify for accuracy the minutes of Committee meetings prepared by the assigned Commission staff member; and
( 5 ) Perform such other functions as the Committee may authorize or the Commission may request.
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

January 19, 2016

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit

333 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Re: Jan Miller

v. Federal Election Commission

No. 15-428

(Your No. 13-5162)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

USCA Case #13-5162 Document #1594440 Filed: 01/19/2016 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Manhattan Silk Company, Appellant, *v.*Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Manhattan Silk Go.*v. *Kelsey,*125 App. Div. 913, affirmed.

(Submitted January 3, 1910;

decided January 18, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 4, 1908, which affirmed a determination of the defendant fixing the amount of a franchise tax against the relator.

*Myer Nussbaum, Alfred A. Cook*and *Charles K. Allen*for appellant.

*Edward R. O'Malley, Attorney-General (Franklin Kennedy*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chase, JJ.