alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 5, 1961 

Honorable R. E. Gray 

County Attorney 

San Saba County - 

San Saba. Texas 

Opinion No. WW-1082 

Re: Use of bond proceeds. 

Dear Mr. Gray: 

you request an opinion based on the following 

facts: 

In a 19.38 election in San Saba County the issue 

was whether or not the voters favored the authorization of 

a $138,000.00 bond issue under the terms of Section 52, 

Article III, Constitution of Texas, and Acts 39th Legislature (1926), 1st Called Session, Ch. 16. 

In all phases of the election proceedings specific 

projects were named and a definite sum of the proceeds of 

the proposed bond issue was allotted each. The purpose and 

use of the money, dollar for dollar, was predetermined by 

the Commissioners' Court in the event the voters authorized 

the issuance of the bonds. 

The voters sustained the proposition by the necessary two-thirds (2/3) majority. The bonds were issued as 

"San Saba County, Texas, Road Bonds, Series 1938," $138,- 

000.00. 

The one voted proposition pertinent here read: 

"To assist in constructing a new bridge 

across the Colorado River at Northwest, 

Ten Thousand Dollars ($lO,OOO.OO)" 

We are advised that this bridge has never been built 

and there is no bridge of any nature at that site. 
. 

Honorable R. E. Gray, page 2 (WW-1082) 

you inform us that all of the bonds in the 1938 

Series have been retired and request an opinion as to the 

disposition of the $lO,OOO.OO. 

It is fundamental that proceeds from the sale of 

bonds can be legally expended only for the purpose for which 

they were voted. 

Gordon v. Commissioners' Court of Jefferson 

Countv, 310 S.W.Zd 761 (Civ.App.1958, error 

ref. n.r.e.1; 

Lewis v. City of Fort Worth, 126 Tex. 458, 

89 S.W.2d 975 (1936); 

Gillham v. Citv of Dallas, 207 S.W.Zd 978 (Civ. 

App. 1948, error ref. n.r.e.); 

Wright v. Allen, 257 S.W. 980 (Civ.App. 1924, 

error'ref.); 

Black v. Strenqth, 112 Tex. 188, 246 S-W.79 

(1922) : 

Moore v. Coffman, 109 Tex. 93, '200 S.W. 374 

(1918). 

Consequently, your first question, whether the 

money can be spent on general road improvements in a certain precinct, is answered in the negative. ~~ 

your second question is: "If not, iiiwhich fund 

shall the money be placed?" The bonds were voted under the 

provisions of Acts 39th Leg., 1st C.S., Ch. 16, p. 23. Section 12 thereof treats of then sale of-such~bonds and provides: ~.~~ . 

* . . . the purchase money therefor shall 

be placed in the county treasury of such 

county to the credit of the available 

road fund . . .*I 

,- 

In this case the money~may be,ljlaced in the available road fund but it may be expended only asp directed in 

the voted proposition. 
Honorable R. E. Gray, page 3 (WW-1082) 

SUMMARY 

Bond proceeds cannot be legally 

diverted from the purpose for 

which they were voted. 

Very truly yours, 

GW-s 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COM?UTTEE: 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Joe Osborn 

Arthur Sandlin 

Linward Shivers 

WILL WILSON 

Reviewed for the Attorney General 

By: Morgan Nesbitt
From: Steve Edris

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: Mineral Wool Mact - Formaldehyde

Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:52:17 PM

Thanks Cindy for mentioning you could walk me through the methodology for setting the 0.46

lb/ton formaldehyde limit for vertical collection and curing. Do you have time to call?

Best regards,

Steve Edris, President & CEO

Thermafiber, Inc. (260) 563-2111 ext. 214

Attention: 

The contents of this message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the

message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, retransmission, or other use of this

communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by return email and delete the message and any attachments

from your system.

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
#### §§ 84.24-84.30 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark W.
Marinko, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 27, 2015



/s/ Mark W. MarinkoMark W. MarinkoSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Cite as: 551 U. S. ____ (2007) 1 

Opinion of BREYER, J. 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ 

Nos. 05ñ1589 and 05ñ1657 

_________________ 

GARY DAVENPORT, ET AL., PETITIONERS 

05ñ1589 v.

WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 

WASHINGTON, PETITIONER 

05ñ1657 v.

WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 

ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF

WASHINGTON

[June 14, 2007] 

 JUSTICE BREYER, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and 

JUSTICE ALITO join, concurring in part and concurring in 

the judgment. 

 I agree with the Court that the Supreme Court of Washingtonís decision rested entirely on flawed interpretations 

of this Courtís agency-fee cases and our decision in Boy 

Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U. S. 640 (2000). I therefore concur in the Courtís judgment, and I join Parts I and 

IIñA and the second paragraph of n. 2 of the Courtís opinion. However, I do not join Part IIñB, which addresses 

numerous arguments that respondent Washington Education Association raised for the first time in its briefs before 

this Court. See, e.g., State ex rel. Washington State Public 

Disclosure Commín v. Washington Ed. Assn., 156 Wash. 2d 

543, 565, n. 6, 130 P. 3d 352, 362, n. 6, (2006) (en banc) 

(noting that one of these arguments was neither raised nor 

addressed below). I would not address those arguments 

until the lower courts have been given the opportunity to 

address them. See, e.g., National Collegiate Athletic Assn.

v. Smith, 525 U. S. 459, 469ñ470 (1999).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00757

- CV

Appellant, Robert A. Marshall // Cross

- Appellants, Scott Law Ortho Corp. P.C.; and Julio De La Fuente, DDS

v.

Appellees, Scott Law Ortho Corp. P.C.; and Julio De La Fuent e, DDS //

C r oss - Appellee, Robert A. Marshall

FROM THE 425TH JUDIC IAL DISTRICT COURT O F WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 18

- 1561

- C425, TH E HONORABLE BETSY F. LAMBETH, JUDGE PRES IDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Robert A. Marshall and cross

- appellants S co t t Law Ortho Corp. P.C.

and Julio De La Fuente, DDS, have filed a joi nt motion to dismiss this appeal. We g rant the joint

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

_________________________ _________________ Thomas J. Baker , Jus ti c e

Before Chief J us ti ce Rose, Justices Baker and Triana

Dismissed on Appellant’s and Cross

- A p pellants ’ Joint Motion

Filed: March 5, 2020
#### § 160.300 Applicability.

This subpart applies to actions by the Secretary, covered entities, business associates, and others with respect to ascertaining the compliance by covered entities and business associates with, and the enforcement of, the applicable provisions of this part 160 and parts 162 and 164 of this subchapter.

[78 FR 5690, Jan. 25, 2013]
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Otto Lind, Deceased. William M. Hoes, Public Administrator of the County of New York; Appellant; The Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent

*Matter of Lind,*132 App. Div. 321, affirmed.

(Argued November 9, 1909;

decided November 23, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 21, 1909, which reversed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court suspending taxation upon the shares of persons entitled to share in decedent’s estate until the time *571such persons are discovered and ascertained and directed that such shares be taxed at the rate of five per centum.

*J. Warren*Greene, *Frederic C. Gladden*and *Frank W, Arnold*for appellant,

*Millm'd II Ellison*for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 14087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04876]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel: Correction

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 14, 2013, the Department of Energy (DOE) published 
a notice of open meeting for the DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory 
Panel to be held on March 11-12, 2013. This document makes a correction 
to that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kogut, Executive Secretary; High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel; U.S. Department of Energy; SC-25; 
Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone: 301-903-1298.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of February 21, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-
04064, on page 12043, please make the following correction:
    Under DATES, page 12043, third column, first paragraph, first line, 
the time has changed. The new time is 9:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 26, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-04876 Filed 3-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2003


The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business, Inc. ("Issuer")
for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

        a).     fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        b).     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Issuer.


        This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Issuer for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003.

        This Certification is executed as of May 14, 2003.




                                            /s/ Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                            --------------------------
                                            Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-98]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panels (SEP): In-Country Development of H5N1 Influenza 
Vaccines in Vietnam, Program Announcement Number CI06-008

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:
    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): In-Country Development of H5N1 Influenza 
Vaccines in Vietnam, Program Announcement Number CI06-008.
    Times and Dates: 11 a.m.-1 p.m., January 23, 2006 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in section 5523b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to: In-
Country Development of H5N1 Influenza Vaccines in Vietnam, Program 
Announcement Number CI06-008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Lerchen, Dr.P.H., Associate 
Director, Office of Public Health Research, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D-72, Atlanta, GA 
30030, Telephone (404) 639-4897.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 30, 2005.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 06-98 Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA-2011-0475 Directorate Identifier: 201 0-NM-199-AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, A TA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Scott Moreen 1/31/2013 Concur. 

Other/Additional Information:
§ 75.104 Supersession. As described in § 75.110, this part supersedes: ( a ) The following OMB guidance documents and regulations under Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations: ( 1 ) A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions” (2 CFR part 220);
( 2 ) A-87, “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments” (2 CFR part 225) and also Federal Register notice 51 FR 552 (January 6, 1986);
( 3 ) A-89, “Federal Domestic Assistance Program Information”;
( 4 ) A-102, “Grant Awards and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments”;
( 5 ) A-110, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Awards and Other Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations” (codified at 2 CFR 215);
( 6 ) A-122, “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations” (2 CFR part 230);
( 7 ) A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations”, and
( 8 ) Those sections of A-50 related to audits performed under subpart F of this part.
( b ) This part also supersedes HHS' regulations at 45 CFR parts 74 and 92.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3014, Jan. 20, 2016]
# C_2009077EN.01004101.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/41

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory markings for two or three-wheel motor vehicles (Codified version)’

COM(2008) 318 final — 2008/0099 (COD)

(2009/C 77/08)

On 18 June 2008 the Council of the European Union decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory markings for two or three-wheel motor vehicles (Codified version).

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory markings for two or three-wheel motor vehicles (Codified version).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 447th plenary session of 17 and 18 September 2008 (meeting of 17 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 17 September 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
Exhibit 21



GENSYM CORPORATION



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                 |  |                              
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                 | 
|Gensym International Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|                                 | 
|Gensym Securities Corporation    |  | Massachusetts                
|                                 | 
|Gensym B.V.                      |  | The Netherlands              
|                                 | 
|Gensym S.A.                      |  | France                       
|                                 | 
|Gensym Ltd.                      |  | United Kingdom               
|                                 | 
|Gensym Srl.                      |  | Italy                        
|                                 | 
|Gensym MENA                      |  | Tunisia                      
|                                 | 
|Gensym Japan Corporation         |  | Japan
§ 504.2 Time within which claims may be filed. ( a ) Claims of individuals entitled to benefits under section 5(i) of the War Claims Act of 1948, as added by Public Law 91-289, will be accepted by the Commission during the period beginning June 24, 1970, and ending: ( 1 ) June 24, 1973, inclusive;
( 2 ) 3 years from the date the civilian American citizen by whom the claim is filed returned to the jurisdiction of the United States; or
( 3 ) 3 years from the date upon which the Commission, at the request of a potentially eligible survivor, makes a determination that the civilian American citizen has actually died or may be presumed to be dead, in the case of any civilian American citizen who has not returned to the jurisdiction of the United States, whichever of the preceding dates last occurs.
( b ) Claims of individuals entitled to benefits under section 6(f) of the War Claims Act of 1948, as added by Public Law 91-289, will be accepted by the Commission during the period beginning June 24, 1970, and ending: ( 1 ) June 24, 1973, inclusive;
( 2 ) 3 years from the date the prisoner of war by whom the claim is filed returned to the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces of the United States; or
( 3 ) 3 years from the date the Department of Defense makes a determination that the prisoner of war has actually died or is presumed to be dead, in the case of any prisoner of war who has not returned to the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces of the United States, whichever of the preceding dates last occurs.
§ 92.3 Relationship to other laws. ( a ) Neither section 1557 nor this part shall be construed to apply a lesser standard for the protection of individuals from discrimination than the standards applied under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, or the regulations issued pursuant to those laws.
( b ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to invalidate or limit the rights, remedies, procedures, or legal standards available under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or the Age Discrimination Act of 1975.
( c ) Insofar as the application of any requirement under this part would violate applicable Federal protections for religious freedom and conscience, such application shall not be required. For example, 42 U.S.C. 18023 provides (among other things) that nothing in section 1557 shall be construed to have any effect on Federal laws regarding conscience protection; willingness or refusal to provide abortion; and discrimination on the basis of the willingness or refusal to provide, pay for, cover, or refer for abortion or to provide or participate in training to provide abortion.
( d ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to supersede State or local laws that provide additional protections against discrimination on any basis described in § 92.1.
#### § 1705.9 Disclosure of record to a person other than the individual to whom the record pertains.

An individual to whom a record is to be disclosed in person may have a person of his or her own choosing accompany the individual when the record is disclosed.
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

October 8, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Receipt of the Confidentially Submitted Documents for White Owl Development Group, LLC. 

(Docket FAA-2015-3750)

Dear Sir or Madam:

White Owl Development Group, LLC’s manuals were confidentially submitted to 

333exemptions@faa.gov on September 28, 2015 and a receipt was returned on October 2, 2015. The 

confidential submission included:

1) Flight Operations & Procedures Manual (FOPM)

2) Motion Picture & Television Operating Manual (MPTOM)

3) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Inspire 1

4) PIC Qualification Process, Test & Logbook

5) VO Qualification Process & Test

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me 

at (561)222-6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.