alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2010008EN.01012101.xml

| 14.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 8/121 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 8/121

---

Tuesday 23 September 2008Statistical returns in respect of the carriage of goods by road as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission ***I

P6_TA(2008)0416

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 September 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1172/98 on statistical returns in respect of the carriage of goods by road as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission (COM(2007)0778 — C6-0451/2007 — 2007/0269(COD))

2010/C 8 E/23

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0778),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0451/2007),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0258/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Tuesday 23 September 2008P6_TC1-COD(2007)0269

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 23 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1172/98 on statistical returns in respect of the carriage of goods by road, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, (EC) No .../2009.)

---
§ 2540.205 By when must the National Service Criminal History Check be completed? ( a ) The National Service Criminal History Check must be conducted, reviewed, and an eligibility determination made by the grant recipient or subrecipient based on the results of the National Service Criminal History Check *before* a person begins to work or serve in a position specified in § 2540.201(a).
( b ) If a person serves consecutive terms of service or employment with the same organization in a position specified in § 2540.201(a) and does not have a break in service or employment longer than 180 days, then no additional National Service Criminal History Check is required, as long as the original check complied with the requirements of § 2540.204. If a National Service Criminal History Check was not conducted on a person because they were under the age of 18 at the time they began their prior term(s) of service or employment in a covered position, pursuant to § 2540.201(b), a National Service Criminal History check must be conducted prior to the individual beginning a subsequent term of work or service for which the person is 18 years of age or older at the start of work or service.
( c ) Persons working or serving in positions specified in § 2540.201(a) prior to May 1, 2021, who continue working or serving in a position specified in § 2540.201(a) on or after November 1, 2021, must have a National Service Criminal History Check conducted, reviewed, and an eligibility determination made by the grant recipient or subrecipient based on the results of the National Service Criminal History Check completed in accordance with this part. For these people, the National Service Criminal History Check must be completed no later than November 1, 2021.
[86 FR 11147, Feb. 24, 2021]
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 34 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 34 Filed 02/23/16 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 34 Filed 02/23/16 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 34 Filed 02/23/16 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 34 Filed 02/23/16 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 34 Filed 02/23/16 Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 9 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 9

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 
Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status 
            for the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating 
to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-
Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Northern 
Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the Southern 
Distinct Population Segment'' (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 25, 2022)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate May 3, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 9

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 
Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status 
            for the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.
```
#### § 670.22 Designation of native invertebrates.

The following are designated native invertebrates:

Mites

Nematodes

Rotifers

Springtails

Tardigrades

[86 FR 27988, May 25, 2021]
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 78 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management 

relating to ‘‘Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. 

RICKETTS, Mr. LEE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

SULLIVAN, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Fluid Mineral 

5 Leases and Leasing Process’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 30916 (April 

6 23, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 33.10 Procedures for salary offset. ( a ) *Method and source of deductions.* Unless the employee and the Secretary have agreed to an alternative repayment arrangement under § 33.8, a debt shall be collected in lump sum or by installment deductions at officially established pay intervals from an employee's current pay account.
( b ) *Limitation on amount of deduction.* Ordinarily, the size of installment deductions must bear a reasonable relationship to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. However, the amount deducted for any pay period must not exceed 15 percent of the disposable pay from which the deduction is made, unless the employee has agreed in writing to the deduction of a greater amount, as outlined in § 33.8.
( c ) *Duration of deductions.* ( 1 ) Lump sum. If the amount of the debt is equal to or less than 15 percent of the employee's disposable pay for an officially established pay interval, the debt generally will be collected in one lump-sum deduction.
( 2 ) If the employee is deemed financially unable to pay in one lump-sum or the amount of the debt exceeds 15 percent of the employee's disposable pay for an officially established pay interval, the debt shall be collected in installments. Except as provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, installment deductions must be made over a period not greater than the anticipated period of active duty or employment.
( d ) *When deductions may begin.* ( 1 ) Deductions will begin on the date stated in the notice of intent, unless an alternative repayment agreement under § 33.8 has been accepted or the employee has filed a timely request for a hearing.
( 2 ) If the employee files a timely petition for hearing as provided in § 33.6, deductions will begin after the hearing official has provided the employee with a hearing and a final written decision has been rendered in favor of the Department.
( e ) *Liquidation from final check.* If an employee retires, resigns, or the period of employment ends before collection of the debt is completed, the remainder of the debt will be offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716 from subsequent payments of any nature (e.g., final salary payment or lump-sum leave) due the employee from the paying agency as of the date of separation.
( f ) *Recovery from other payments due a separated employee.* If the debt cannot be satisfied by offset from any final payment due the employee on the date of separation, the Secretary will liquidate the debt, where appropriate, by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716 from later payments of any kind due the former employee (e.g., lump sum leave payment).
§ 261.50 What happens if a State fails to meet the participation rates? ( a ) If we determine that a State did not achieve one of the required minimum work participation rates, we must reduce the SFAG payable to the State.
( b ) ( 1 ) If there was no penalty for the preceding fiscal year, the base penalty for the current fiscal year is five percent of the adjusted SFAG.
( 2 ) For each consecutive year that the State is subject to a penalty under this part, we will increase the amount of the base penalty by two percentage points over the previous year's penalty. However, the penalty can never exceed 21 percent of the State's adjusted SFAG.
( c ) We impose a penalty by reducing the SFAG payable for the fiscal year that immediately follows our final determination that a State is subject to a penalty and our final determination of the penalty amount.
( d ) In accordance with the procedures specified at § 262.4 of this chapter, a State may dispute our determination that it is subject to a penalty.
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 35 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 35 Filed 02/23/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 35 Filed 02/23/16 Page 3 of 3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PIERCE O’DONNELL,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-50296

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00872-SJO-1

Central District of California, 

Los Angeles

ORDER

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

The panel has voted to deny Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing. Judge

Fisher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Goodwin

and Canby so recommend.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no

judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App.

P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed

June 28, 2010, is DENIED.

FILED

DEC 06 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 09-50296 12/06/2010 Page: 1 of 1 ID: 7567645 DktEntry: 52
The Bay Area’s Extraordinary Global Business Base Underscores T

for Convenient Access to the World’s Third Largest Economy

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-1 

Source: Analysis by San Francisco International Airport, as of 2011
Number of First/Business Passengers to Tokyo, 2011

Share of First/Business Class bookings SFO‐Tokyo 13.5% x 230,918 passengers; share of First /Business Class bookings SEA‐Tokyo 9.2% x 85,386 passenger

Sources: Share estimate from MIDT 2011; passengers from UA‐106.

In 2011, Nearly Four Times as Many Travelers Flew First/Business 

Tokyo from San Francisco as from Seattle

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-2 

31,174

7,856

0

5,000

10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,000

SFO SEA
Percent of Bookings in First/Business to Tokyo, 2011

Source: MIDT 2011

San Francisco Has a Much Higher Proportion of First/Business Cla

Travelers to Tokyo than Does Los Angeles or Seattle

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-3 

13.5%

10.2%

9.2%

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%

SFO LAX SEA
Percent of Bookings in First/Business and Premium Economy to Tokyo, 2011

Source: MIDT 2011

San Francisco Has a Higher Proportion of First/Business/Premium Econo

Travelers to Tokyo than Does Los Angeles or the Much Smaller Seattle M

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-4 

13.5%

9.2% 10.2%

31.7%

30.7%

22.4%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%

SFO SEA LAX

Premium EconomyFirst & Business
Exports to Japan by Air – 2011

Value in Dollars ($ Billions)

California’s Air Exports to Japan Are Many Times the Value and W

Those from the State of Washington

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-5 

Exports to Japan by Air – 2011

Metric Tons (000s)

$7.70

$0.55

0123456789

California Washington

$ Billions

79.9

9.9

0

102030405060708090

California Washington

Metric Tons (000s)

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Foreign Trade Statistics 2011
The Flight Time Differences Between Seattle‐Tokyo an

San Francisco Tokyo Are Minimal

Tue, Sep 11 2:10 PM

Delta Air Lines 155

SeattleSEA 4:35 PM

Tokyo NRT non‐stop

10hr 25min

Return Tue, Sep 18 4:10 PM

Delta Air Lines 156Tokyo NRT 9:15 AM

Seattle SEA non‐stop

9hr 5min

United Airlines 837

San FranciscoSFO 2:20 PM

Tokyo NRT non‐stop10hr 58min

Return Tue, Sep 18 4:00 PM

United Airlines 838

Tokyo NRT 9:01 AMSan Francisco SFO non‐stop

9hr 1min

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-6 

Source: Orbitz, accessed September 4, 2012
United’s SFO Hub Offers Far More On‐Line Connection

than the Other Applicants

Number of On‐Line Connecting Markets in U.S., Caribbean, Canada, and L

America

Source: OAG September 2012

Docket DOT-2010-0018Exhibit SF-7 

75

38

7

2

0

1020304050607080

UA ‐ SFO AA ‐ LAX DL ‐ SEA HA ‐ KOA
Exhibit A

San Francisco International Airport Letters in Support
#### § 2556.765 What disciplinary actions are VISTAs subject to for violating restrictions or prohibitions on political activities?

Violations by a VISTA of any of the prohibitions or restrictions set forth in this subpart may warrant termination for cause, in accordance with proceedings set forth at §§ 2556.420, 2556.425, and 2556.430.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Buddy Roemer for 

President, Inc. (BRFP) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on July 03,2014, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on Buddy Roemer for President, Inc. (BRFP), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and die Audit Division dated 

June 18,2014. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: •• 

Aiaukj (Jnhiid. lJukJ 

Shawn Woodhead Werth f 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Exhibit 32.1

March 12,
2019
Via EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Re:

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of MV Oil Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUSTCOMPANY, N.A.Trustee for MV Oil TrustBy:

/s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH Michael J. Ulrich Vice President


---



QuickLinks
PPDI^IM^nniP TDDIShSmNW • •liDZtiWZDO r'CTXIXIINOUWIw ^ •laBiMiWl 

WWngkiiQC200B5-3WO ftil«BCM«tnii 

Junes,2016 

K\u\\i9^nikuiu\i.cm 

D 4l2eL4J4.l6M 

I- +IJ03Jf4.9ISO 

Ms. Nicole Bwgen 

AudhNvision 

Fedenl Election Commission 

999 E Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20463 

RE: Brenda Lawrence for Congress 

Dear Ms. Bmgess: 

f write in re^Mose ID your May 16,2016 letter regarding the Commission's audit of Brenda 

Lawience for Congress 0*tbe Commiltce'O- Having materially corrected the reports referenced 

in the Draft Find Audh Report's sole findiitg, the Comnutiee has no further response 10 the draft 

report, beyond the response it has already provided to the Irderim Audit Report. TheCommitlee 

docs not sech an audit hearing in this msttcr. Please do not hesitaie to eonlact me if you have 

any questiona. 

Very truly yours, 

Brian G. Svoboda 

Counsel to Brenda Lawrence for Congress 

iViMteiiP
February 25, 2014

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting N otes for the February 10, 2014 Conference Call with AF&PA , URS, and

NCASI

FROM: Kelley Spence (EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG)

TO: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2012

- 0640

This memorandum summarizes the meeting between t he American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA)
, URS Corporation
, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI)
, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) on February 1 0 , 201 4 . The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the proposed New Source Performance Standards for Kraft Pulp Mills.

Meeting Attendees:

Amy Artmeier

– Kapstone John Bradfield

– EPA/SPPD Corey Brandt

– RockTenn Mike Curtis

– Georgia Pacific Robin Dunkins

– EPA/SPPD Russ Frye

– Frye Law PLLC Rich Garber

– PCA/Boise Ka tie Hanks

– RTI Tom Holloway

- RTI Tim Hunt

– AF&PA Amy Marshall

– URS Corporation Annabeth Reitter

– Domtar Jeff Shumaker

– International Paper Kelley Spence

– EPA/SPPD Nick Swanson

– EPA/SPPD Vipin Varma

– NCASI

Discussion Points:

 TRS emission reductions gained using the Clean Condensate Alternative (subpart S)

 Types of washer modifications vs. reconstructed units
§ 503.3 Conditions of disclosure. The Commission will not disclose any record contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person or any other agency except by written request of or prior written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains unless the disclosure is: ( a ) To those officers and employees of the Commission who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;
( b ) Required under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552;
( c ) For a routine use;
( d ) To the Bureau of Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity under the provisions of Title 13, United States Code;
( e ) To a recipient who has provided the Commission with adequate advance assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;
( f ) To the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government or for evaluation to determine whether the record has that value;
( g ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any government jurisdiction within or under control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity authorized by law, provided the head of the agency or instrumentality has made a prior written request to the Commission, specifying the particular record and the law enforcement activity for which it is sought;
( h ) To a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if, upon disclosure, notification is transmitted to the last known address of the individual;
( i ) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of the joint committee;
( j ) To the Comptroller General, or any of that official's authorized representatives, in the course of the performance of the duties of the General Accounting Office; or
( k ) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
§ 260.72 What basic requirements must State demonstration components meet for the purpose of determining if inconsistencies exist with respect to work requirements or time limits? ( a ) The policies must be consistent with the requirements of section 415 of the Act and the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The policies must be within the scope of the approved waivers both in terms of geographical coverage and the coverage of the types of cases specified in the waiver approval package.
( c ) The State must have applied its waiver policies on a continuous basis from the date that it implemented its TANF program, except that it may have adopted modifications that have the effect of making its policies more consistent with the provisions of PRWORA.
( d ) An inconsistency may not apply beyond the earlier of the following dates: ( 1 ) The expiration of waiver authority as determined in accordance with the demonstration terms and conditions; or
( 2 ) For any specific inconsistency, the date upon which the State discontinued the applicable waiver policy.
( e ) The State must submit the Governor's certification specified in § 260.75.
( f ) In general, the policies in this subpart do not have the effect of delaying the date when a State might be subject to the work or time-limit penalties at §§ 261.50, 261.54, and 264.1 of this chapter or the data collection requirements at part 265 of this chapter.