69204 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 230 / Thursday, November 30, 2006 / Notices 

wide rate provide evidence of de jure 

and de facto absence of government 

control over the company’s export 

activities. Accordingly, we will issue a 

questionnaire to Qizheng, including a 

separate rate section. The review will 

proceed if the responses provide 

sufficient indication that Qizheng is not 

subject to either de jure or de facto 

government control with respect to its 

exports of brake rotors. However, if 

Qizheng does not demonstrate its 

eligibility for a separate rate, the 

company will be deemed not separate 

from other companies that exported 

during the POI, and the new shipper 

review for Qizheng will be rescinded. 

On August 17, 2006, the Pension 

Protection Act of 2006 (H.R. 4) was 

signed into law by Congress. Section 

1632 of H.R. 4 temporarily suspends the 

authority of the Department to instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

collect a bond or other security in lieu 

of a cash deposit in new shipper 

reviews. Therefore, the posting of a 

bond or other security under section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act in lieu of a 

cash deposit is not available in this case. 

Importers of brake rotors exported and 

produced by Qizheng must continue to 

post a cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties on each entry of 

subject merchandise (i.e., brake rotors) 

at the PRC–wide entity rate of 43.32 

percent. 

Interested parties that need access to 

proprietary information in this new 

shipper review should submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. 

This initiation and notice are issued 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: November 22, 2006. 

Susan H. Kuhbach 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E6–20256 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–848] 

Helical Spring Lock Washers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Court Decision Not In Harmony With 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 25, 2006, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (‘‘Court’’) sustained the final 

remand determination made by the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) pursuant to the Court’s 

remand of the final results of the 

administrative review of Helical Spring 

Lock Washers (‘‘HSLWs’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China. See 

Shakeproof Assembly Components 

Division of IL Tool Works, Inc. v. United 

States, Consol. Ct. 05–00404, Slip Op. 

06–129 (Ct. Int’l Trade Aug. 25, 2006) 

(‘‘Shakeproof Assembly’’). This case 

arises out of the Department’s October 1, 

2002, through September 30, 2003, 

administrative review final results. See 

Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 70 FR 28274 

(May 17, 2005) (‘‘Final Results’’). The 

final judgment in this case was not in 

harmony with the Department’s Final 

Results. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 4, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marin Weaver or Charles Riggle, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2336 or (202) 482–

0650, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In Shakeproof Assembly Components 

v. United States, Slip Op. 05–163 (CIT, 

Dec. 22, 2005), the Court remanded the 

underlying results to the Department for 

reconsideration of the methodology 

employed to value plating services in 

the calculation of the antidumping duty 

rate for Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Hangzhou’’). 

On May 15, 2006, the Department 

issued the draft results of 

redetermination pursuant to remand to 

Hangzhou and Shakeproof Assembly 

Components Division of Illinois Tool 

Works Inc. (‘‘Shakeproof’’) for comment. 

On May 18, 2006, we received 

comments on our draft redetermination 

from both parties. On June 2, 2006, the 

Department issued its final results of 

redetermination pursuant to remand to 

the Court. The remand redetermination 

explained that the Department found 

the Sudha Electroplaters price quote to 

be the most reliable information on the 

record with which to value zinc plating. 

Moreover, based on the information on 

the record, the Department found that 

this quote should be applied to the 

weight of the un-plated lock washers. 

Thus, the Department recalculated the 

antidumping duty margin for Hangzhou. 

On August 25, 2006, the Court sustained 

the final redetermination made by the 

Department pursuant to the Court’s 

remand of the final results of the 

administrative review of HSLWs from 

the People’s Republic of China. See 

Shakeproof Assembly. 

In its decision in Timken Co. v. 

United States, 893 F. 2d 337, 341 (Fed. 

Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department must publish a 

notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Department 

determination, and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The 

Court’s decision in Shakeproof 

Assembly on August 25, 2006, 

constitutes a final decision of that court 

that is not in harmony with the 

Department’s Final Results. This notice 

is published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken. 

Accordingly, the Department will 

continue the suspension of liquidation 

of the subject merchandise pending a 

final and conclusive court decision. The 

Court’s ruling has been appealed, and if 

it is upheld by the Court of Appeals for 

the Federal Circuit, the Department will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to revise cash deposit rates 

and liquidate relevant entries covering 

the subject merchandise effective 

September 4, 2006. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 516A(c)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: November 17, 2006. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E6–20285 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary of Defense 

Meeting of the DoD Advisory Group on 

Electron Devices 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, 

Advisory Group on Electron Devices. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on 

Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 

closed session meeting. 

DATES: The meeting will be held at 

0900, Tuesday, December 5, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N. 

Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 

22203. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 230 / Thursday, November 30, 2006 / Notices 69205 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis Business 

Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, 

Arlington, VA 22203, 703–741–0300. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

mission of the Advisory Group is to 

provide advice to the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Acquisition, Technology 

and Logistics to the Director of Defense 

Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and 

through the DDR&E to the Director, 

Defense Advanced Research Projects 

Agency and the Military Departments in 

planning and managing an effective and 

economical research and development 

program in the area of electron devices. 

The AGED meeting will be limited to 

review of research and development 

efforts in electronics and photonics with 

a focus on benefits to national defense. 

These reviews may form the basis for 

research and development programs 

initiated by the Military Departments 

and Defense Agencies to be conducted 

by industry, universities or in 

government laboratories. The agenda for 

this meeting will include programs on 

molecular electronics, microelectronics, 

electro-optics, and electronic materials. 

Due to unforeseen circumstances, this 

announcement does not give the 

standard 15-day notification. 

In accordance with Section 10(d) of 

Pub. L. 92–463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. 

App. 2), it has been determined that this 

Advisory Group meeting concerns 

matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and 

that accordingly, this meeting will be 

closed to the public. 

Dated: November 21, 2006. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 06–9465 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP05–357–005] 

Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.; 

Notice of Motion to Vacate Certificate 

in Part 

November 22, 2006. 

Take notice that on November 16, 

2006, Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, 

L.P. (Creole Trail Pipeline), 717 Texas 

Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas 

77002, filed in Docket No. CP05–357–

005, a motion to vacate the certificate 

authority granted on June 15, 2006, in 

Docket Nos. CP05–357–000, et al., to 

construct, own and operate one of the 

lines, referred to as Line 2, of the 

originally certificated 116.8-mile, dual 

42-inch pipelines. Creole Trail Pipeline 

explains that construction of a single 42- 

inch pipeline, referred to as Line 1, is 

sufficient for it to satisfy its 

transportation service obligations. 

The motion is on file with the 

Commission and open for public 

inspection. This motion is available for 

review at the Commission in the Public 

Reference Room or may be viewed on 

the Commission’s Web site at http:// 

www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. 

Enter the docket number excluding the 

last three digits in the docket number 

field to access the document. For 

assistance, please contact FERC Online 

Support at 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll 

free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, 

contact (202) 502–8659. 

Any questions regarding the 

application should be directed to 

Patricia Outtrim, Cheniere Creole Trail 

Pipeline, L.P., 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 

3100, Houston, Texas 77002, (713) 659–

1361 or Lisa Tonery, King & Spalding 

LLP, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, New 

York, NY 10036, (212) 556–2307. 

There are two ways to become 

involved in the Commission’s review of 

this project. First, any person wishing to 

obtain legal status by becoming a party 

to the proceedings for this project 

should, on or before the comment date 

listed below, file with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

a motion to intervene in accordance 

with the requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) 

and the Regulations under the NGA (18 

CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 

status will be placed on the service list 

maintained by the Secretary of the 

Commission and will receive copies of 

all documents filed by the applicant and 

by all other parties. A party must submit 

14 copies of this filing and all 

subsequent filings made with the 

Commission and must mail a copy of all 

filing to the applicant and to every other 

party in the proceeding. Only parties to 

the proceeding can ask for court review 

of Commission orders in the proceeding. 

However, other persons do not have 

to intervene in order to have comments 

considered. The second way to 

participate is by filing with the 

Secretary of the Commission, as soon as 

possible, an original and two copies of 

comments in support of or in opposition 

to this project. The Commission will 

consider these comments in 

determining the appropriate action to be 

taken, but the filing of a comment alone 

will not serve to make the filer a party 

to the proceeding. The Commission’s 

rules require that persons filing 

comments in opposition to this project 

provide copies of their protests only to 

the party or parties directly involved in 

the protest. 

Persons who wish to comment only 

on the environmental review of this 

project, or in support of or in opposition 

to this project, should submit an 

original and two copies of their 

comments to the Secretary of the 

Commission. Environmental 

commenters will be placed on the 

Commission’s environmental mailing 

list, will receive copies of the 

environmental documents, and will be 

notified of meetings associated with the 

Commission’s environmental review 

process. Environmental commenters 

will not be required to serve copies of 

filed documents on all other parties. 

The Commission’s rules require that 

persons filing comments in opposition 

to the project provide copies of their 

protests only to the applicant. However, 

the non-party commenters will not 

receive copies of all documents filed by 

other parties or issued by the 

Commission (except for the mailing of 

environmental documents issued by the 

Commission) and will not have the right 

to seek court review of the 

Commission’s final order. 

The Commission strongly encourages 

electronic filings of comments, protests, 

and interventions via the Internet in lieu 

of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) 

and the instructions on the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. 

Comment Date: December 4, 2006. 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E6–20258 Filed 11–29–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP05–357–004] 

Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.; 

Notice of Amendment 

November 22, 2006. 

Take notice that on November 16, 

2006, Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, 

L.P. (Creole Trail Pipeline), 717 Texas 

Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas 

77002, filed in Docket No. CP05–357–

004, an application to amend its 

pending amendment application filed 

on August 4, 2006, in Docket No. CP05–

357–003. Creole Trail Pipeline explains 

that it was granted certificate 

authorization on June 15, 2006, in 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES