alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.505 When must IRB registration information be renewed or updated? ( a ) Each IRB must renew its registration every 3 years.
( b ) The registration information for an IRB must be updated within 90 days after changes occur regarding the contact person who provided the IRB registration information or the IRB chairperson. The updated registration information must be submitted in accordance with § 46.504.
( c ) Any renewal or update that is submitted to, and accepted by, OHRP begins a new 3-year effective period.
( d ) An institution's or organization's decision to disband a registered IRB which it is operating also must be reported to OHRP in writing within 30 days after permanent cessation of the IRB's review of HHS-conducted or -supported research.
1

Paula Nurthen

From: Jeff Teague <jeff@tndp.org>

Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 11:40 AM

To: Paula Nurthen; Paul Houghtaling; Reiff, Neil; Audit; Geeta McMillan

Cc: Nicole Burgess

Subject: Tennessee Democratic Party Corrective Actions

Attachments: Excessive Contribution Redesignation Letters 02.21.19.pdf; Corrective Action Plan 

Finding 4.pdf; Employee Time Tracking for January 2019.pdf; Employee Time Tracking 

for February 2019.pdf

Attached are the corrective actions for Finding 2. Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit and Finding 4. 

Recordkeeping for Employees. 

For Finding 2, copies of letters sent to contributors who are eligible reattribution and/or refund of excessive 

amounts. 

For Finding 4, a copy of the plan and evidence of recordkeeping for employees beginning in 2019. 

Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.. 

Jeff Teague 

-- 

Jeff Teague 

Executive Director 

Tennessee Democratic Party 

615-327-9779
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and       |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   DATE: June 1, 2010 | By: /s/  | Cris Neely              |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                           |          |                    |   |
|                           |          | Cris Neely              |   |
|                           |          |                    |   |
|                           |          | Chief Financial Officer |   |
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )
) AI17-19
Audit Division Recommendation ) Agenda Document No. 19-27-A
Memorandum on the Oklahoma )
Democratic Party )
CERTIFICATION

I, Laura E. Sinram, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting on
June 20, 2019 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in the above-

captioned matter:

1. Failed by a vote of 2-2 to:

Add a new finding that the Oklahoma Democratic Party violated the
joint fundraising regulations at 11 C.F.R. § 102.17(c) when it received
$3,013,100 in net proceeds from the Hillary Victory Fund joint
fundraising committee and on the same day transferred $3,003,100 to
the Democratic National Committee.

Commissioners Walther and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion,

Commissioners Hunter and Petersen dissented.

2. Decided by a vote of 4-0 to:

Approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the
Oklahoma Democratic Party (A17-19), as set forth in Agenda
Document No. 19-27-A.


Federal Election Commission Page 2
Certification for the Audit Division Recommendation
Memorandum on the Oklahoma Democratic Party (A17-19)
June 20, 2019
Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the

decision.

Attest:

Ulauha aural. Sima

Date Laura E. Sinram
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the
Commission
§ 607.4 Notice requirements before offset. ( a ) Salary offset shall not be made against an employee's pay unless the employee is provided with written notice signed by the Chief Financial Officer of the debt at least 30 days before salary offset commences.
( b ) The written notice shall contain: ( 1 ) A statement that the debt is owed and an explanation of its nature and amount;
( 2 ) The agency's intention to collect the debt by deducting from the employee's current disposable pay account;
( 3 ) The amount, frequency, proposed beginning date, and duration of the intended deduction(s);
( 4 ) An explanation of interest, penalties, and administrative charges, including a statement that such charges will be assessed unless excused in accordance with the Federal Claims Collections Standards at 4 CFR 101.1;
( 5 ) The employee's right to inspect, request, and receive a copy of government records relating to the debt;
( 6 ) The employee's opportunity to establish a written schedule for the voluntary repayment of the debt in lieu of offset;
( 7 ) The employee's right to an oral hearing or a determination based on a review of the written record (“paper hearing”) conducted by an impartial hearing official concerning the existence or the amount of the debt, or the terms of the repayment schedule;
( 8 ) The procedures and time period for petitioning for a hearing;
( 9 ) A statement that a timely filing of a petition for a hearing will stay the commencement of collection proceedings;
( 10 ) A statement that a final decision on the hearing (if requested) will be issued by the hearing official not later than 60 days after the filing of the petition requesting the hearing unless the employee requests and the hearing official grants a delay in the proceedings;
( 11 ) A statement that knowingly false or frivolous statements, representations, or evidence may subject the employee to appropriate disciplinary procedures and/or statutory penalties;
( 12 ) A statement of other rights and remedies available to the employee under statutes or regulations governing the program for which the collection is being made;
( 13 ) Unless there are contractual or statutory provisions to the contrary, a statement that amounts paid on or deducted for the debt which are later waived or found not owed to the United States will be promptly refunded to the employee; and
( 14 ) A statement that the proceedings regarding such debt are governed by section 5 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (5 U.S.C. 5514).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

p0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148248(60)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148248

COA: 310706

Wayne CC: 11-004936-FC

PAUL ANTHONY DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 28, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
April 21 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Supplemental Documentation for petition Docket ID FAA

- 2015

- 0161

Dear Sir or Madam,

This is to notify that we have been contacted by FAA personnel from the Office of

Rulemaking, in response to our previous letter dated April 6, 2015.

We also would like to notify that regarding our petition, we will submit our proprietary

supplemental documents separatel y

, in accordance with the instructions provided by

afore mentioned FAA personnel.

Please do not hesitate to contact us

, if there is anything else that would need our

attention regarding the matter

.

Respectfully,

Bryan Archer

President

Galaxy UAV Systems (a subsidiary of Galaxy Aviation Inc.)

6215 Kirby Lane

, Frisco, Texas 75035

Tel : 469

- 766

- 0420

Email: bryan.archer@galaxyuav.com
Preliminary Injunction Motion 2d 1

United States District Court

Eastern District of Virginia

Richmond Division

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v.

Federal Election Commission and

United States Department of Justice,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:08-cv-00483-JRS

Notice of Appeal

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. (“RTAO”) hereby notices appeal of this Court’s September 11, 2008 Order (Doc. No. 65) denying RTAO’s motions for preliminary injunction (Doc.

Nos. 3, 53) to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).

James Bopp, Jr.,* jboppjr@aol.com

Richard E. Coleson,* rcoleson@bopplaw.com

Barry A. Bostrom,* bbostrom@bopplaw.com

Clayton J. Callen,* ccallen@bopplaw.com

BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM

1 South Sixth Street

Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510

812/232-2434 telephone

812/234-3685 facsimile

*pro hac vice motion granted

Lead Counsel for Plaintiff

Respectfully submitted,

/s/

Michael Boos (VA State Bar No. 37524)

Law Office of Michael Boos

4101 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 313

Fairfax, VA 22030

703/691-7717 telephone

703/691-7543 facsimile

michael.boos@gte.net

Local Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS Document 67 Filed 09/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal 2

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on September 12, 2008, I served upon the below listed persons copies

of this document by electronically filing this document for electronic transmission.

John Richard Griffiths

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

P.O. Box 883

Washington, DC 20044

john.griffiths@usdoj.gov

Debra Jean Prillaman

Office of U.S. Attorney

600 East Main Street, Suite 1800

Richmond, VA 23219

debra.prillaman@usdoj.gov

J. Gerald Hebert J. Gerald Hebert, P.C. 5019

Waple Ln Alexandria, VA 22304

ghebert@campaignlegalcenter.org

Audra Anne Hale-Maddox

ahale-maddox@fec.gov

Thomasenia P. Duncan

tduncan@fec.gov

David Kolkler. dkokler@fec.gov

Kevin Deeley, kdeeley@fec.gov

Holly Baker, hbaker@fec.gov

Vivien Clair, vclair@fec.gov

Seth Nesin, snesin@fec.gov

Adav Noti, anoti@fec.gov

Claire Rajan, crajan@fec.gov

Federal Election Commission

999 E Street NW

Washington, DC 20463

And I hereby certify that I will mail the document by U.S. mail to the following non-filing users:

Daniel R. Ortiz John Allan Love Professor of

Law University of Virginia School of Law

580 Massie Road

Charlottesville, VA 22903-1738

Richard Briffault Joseph P. Chamberlain

Professor of Legislation Columbia University

School of Law 435 West 116th Street

New York, NY 10027

____________/s/__________________

Michael Boos (VA State Bar No. 37524)

Law Office of Michael Boos

4101 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 313

Fairfax, VA 22030

703/691-7717 telephone

703/691-7543 facsimile

michael.boos@gte.net

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS Document 67 Filed 09/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ISMET GJELOSHI and FATIMA )

GJELOSHI, )

)

 Appellants, ) 

)

v. ) Case Nos. 2D16-4812 

) 2D17-310

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Assignor ) CONSOLIDATED

to YASSO, INC., Assignee/Assignor to )

TMF 12, LLC; ROBERT J. WRIGHT; )

DOTTIE A. WRIGHT; 1300 S. HIGHLAND )

CORP.; MID-OHIO SECURITIES )

as custodian for Michael J. Guju; and )

CVILLE, INC., )

)

 Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Thomas J. Minkoff, Judge.

Jawdet I. Rubaii and Jack F. White, III, of 

Jawdet I. Rubaii, P.A., Clearwater, for 

Appellants.

Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa; 

Bradley J. Wood of Bradley J. Wood, P.A., 

St. Petersburg; and Michael P. Beltran of 

Beltran Litigation, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellee TMF 12 LLC.

James A. Staack and Kristine M. Reighard 

of Staack, Sims & Reighard, P.L., 
- 2 -

Clearwater, for Appellees Robert J. Wright, 

Dottie A. Wright, and 1300 S. Highland 

Corp.

No Appearance for remaining Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00092

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E., JR., Et al., Children,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00722

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief for Tommi Jo Torres is

GRANTED

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 630.505 How are violations of this part determined for recipients who are individuals? An individual recipient is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Director or designee determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The recipient is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity.
150°0'0"W

150°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

151°0'0"W

61°0'0"N

61°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

60°0'0"N

Figure 19. Alternative D

Management Categories

Produced in the Division of Realty

and Natural Resources

Anchorage, Alaska

Current to: February 29, 2008

Kenai

NWR

Anchorage

Map

Extent

0 3.75 7.5 15

Miles

08-0051 JGB

Note: This map does not address ownership of navigable waters.

0 5 10 20

Kilometers

C o o k

I n l e t

B a y

K a c h e m a k

Seldovia

Homer

Kenai

Soldotna

Sterling

Cooper

Landing

Seward

Ninilchik

Salamatof

Hope

Tyonek T u r n a g a i n A r m

Chickaloon Bay

Tustumena Lake

Skilak Lake

Gulf of Alaska

Intensive

Moderate

Minimal

Wilderness

State/Private

Refuge Boundary

54,500

49,450

514,550

1,319,500

50,000

2.7%

2.5%

25.9%

66.4%

2.5%

Area Acreage Percentage
§ 75.386 Post-closeout adjustments and continuing responsibilities. ( a ) The closeout of a Federal award does not affect any of the following: ( 1 ) The right of the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review. The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity must make any cost disallowance determination and notify the non-Federal entity within the record retention period.
( 2 ) The obligation of the non-Federal entity to return any funds due as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions including final indirect cost rate adjustments.
( 3 ) Audit requirements in subpart F of this part.
( 4 ) Property management and disposition requirements in §§ 75.317 through 75.323.
( 5 ) Records retention as required in §§ 75.361 through 75.365.
( b ) After closeout of the Federal award, a relationship created under the Federal award may be modified or ended in whole or in part with the consent of the HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity and the non-Federal entity, provided the responsibilities of the non-Federal entity referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, including those for property management as applicable, are considered and provisions made for continuing responsibilities of the non-Federal entity, as appropriate.
# CE2009286EN.01017101.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/171 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/171

---

Wednesday 18 June 2008Adaptation of a number of instruments to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, omnibus Regulation, Part Three ***I

P6_TA(2008)0299

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 June 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Three (COM(2007)0822 — C6-0474/2007 — 2007/0282(COD))

2009/C 286 E/48

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0822),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 61(c), Article 63, first paragraph, point 1(a), and Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0474/2007),

having regard to the undertakings given by the Council representative by letter of 28 May 2008 to adopt the proposal without amendments, in accordance with Article 251(2), second subparagraph, second indent of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0086/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 2 / Thursday, January 4, 2007 / Presidential Documents 423 

Proclamation 8094 of December 28, 2006 

National Day of Mourning for Gerald R. Ford 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a further mark of respect to the memory of Gerald R. Ford, the thirtyeighth President of the United States, 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, in honor and tribute to the memory of Gerald R. 

Ford, and as an expression of public sorrow, do appoint Tuesday, January 

2, 2007, as a National Day of Mourning throughout the United States. I 

call on the American people to assemble on that day in their respective 

places of worship, there to pay homage to the memory of President Ford. 

I invite the people of the world who share our grief to join us in this 

solemn observance. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth 

day of December in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfirst. 

[FR Doc. 06–9992 

Filed 1–3–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 1514 Lower Tribunal No s

. F20

- 6820, F20

- 6263, F20

- 14272, F20

- 14273

________________



### Arnold Caso , Appellant,

vs.


### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Cristina Miranda , Judge.

Arnold Caso , in proper person. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 Because the trial cou rt's exercise of discretion in ruling on the merits

of a motion t o reduce or mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) is not subject to appellate review, we dismiss

this a ppeal. See Smith v. State , 902 So. 2d 29 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ; Graham

v. State , 845 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). See also Diaz v. State , 931

So. 2d 1002 , 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (observing that “an order denying a motion to reduce or mitigate a sentence is not appealable” but may be

treated as a petition for writ of certiorari where the trial court denied the motion as untimely without reaching the merits).
Appeal dismissed.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11, 2021 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

VIRTUAL MEETING. NOTE: BECAUSE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, WE WILL 

CONDUCT THE OPEN MEETING VIRTUALLY. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ACCESS

THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL 

MEETING, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE 

BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-08: Congressman Scott Fitzgerald

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: August 4, 2021
#### Joseph A. Joel, *Appellant, v.*Edward B. Fowler and William C. Reddy, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with costs and dis bursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
§ 606.10 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The Foundation shall, within one year of the effective date of this part, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the Foundation shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The Foundation shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with handicaps or organizations representing individuals with handicaps, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The Foundation shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (a) of this section, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A list of the interested persons who made comments;
( 2 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 3 ) A description of any modifications made.