alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1582 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1582

 To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to strike a 
         provision included in a recent amendment of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

 Mr. LaTourette (for himself, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Austria, Ms. Foxx, Mr. 
   Upton, Mr. Cole, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. 
 Simpson, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Dent, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Burton of 
 Indiana, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Latham, 
    Mr. Marchant, Mr. Turner, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Roe of 
Tennessee, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. 
    Goodlatte, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Broun of 
Georgia, Mrs. Bono Mack, Mr. Luetkemeyer, and Mr. Akin) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to strike a 
         provision included in a recent amendment of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Executive Bonus Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(b)(3)(D) of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5221(b)(3)(D)) is amended by 
striking clause (iii).
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 111 of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008 shall apply on and after the date of the 
enactment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 as if 
the clause struck by subsection (a) of this section had not been 
included in the amendment of such section 111 by section 7001 of the 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 606.41-606.49 [Reserved]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM December 19,2017 

TO: 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Erin Chlopak 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

Lorenro Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Danita Alberico j P 

Attomey 

for DA 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on Kelly for Congress (LRA 1056) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Interim Audit Report ("lAR") on 

Kelly for Congress. The lAR contains two findings: (1) Receipt of Apparent Prohibited 

Contribution - Bank Loan; and (2) Receipt of Contributions that Exceed Limits.' We concur 

with the findings. If you have any questions, please contact Danita Alberico, the attomey 

assigned to this audit. 

' We recommend that the Commission consider this document in Executive Session because the 

Commission may eventually decide to pursue an investigation of matters contained in the proposed lAR. 

11 C.F.R.§§ 2.4(a) and (b)(6).
III 

★(Star Print)

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 14 

Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the State of Israel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2023 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. 

SCHMITT, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. VANCE, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. CRUZ, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. ERNST, Mrs. 

HYDE-SMITH, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. CASSIDY) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the State of 

Israel. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) the State of Israel is not a racist or apart4 heid State; 

5 (2) Congress rejects all forms of antisemitism 

6 and xenophobia; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SCON 14 IS1S 

1 (3) the United States will always be a staunch 

2 partner and supporter of Israel. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1801.18 Limitations on nominations.

A candidate nominated by an institution and not selected as a Truman Scholar may not be renominated the following year.
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK Document 14 Filed 09/10/14 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK Document 14 Filed 09/10/14 Page 2 of 2
§ 264.72 What requirements are imposed on a State if it receives contingency funds? ( a ) ( 1 ) A State must meet a Contingency Fund MOE level of 100 percent of historic State expenditures for FY 1994.
( 2 ) A State must exceed the Contingency Fund MOE level to keep any of the contingency funds that it received. It may be able to retain a portion of the amount of contingency funds that match countable State expenditures, as defined in § 264.0, that are in excess of the State's Contingency Fund MOE level, after the overall adjustment required by section 403(b)(6)(C) of the Act.
( b ) A State must complete an annual reconciliation, in accordance with § 264.73, in order to determine how much, if any, of the contingency funds that it received in a fiscal year it may retain.
( c ) If required to remit funds under the annual reconciliation, a State must remit all (or a portion) of the funds paid to it for a fiscal year within one year after it has failed to meet either the Food Stamp trigger or the Unemployment trigger, as defined in § 264.0, for three consecutive months.
( d ) A State must expend contingency funds in the fiscal year in which they are awarded.
( e ) A State may not transfer contingency funds to the Discretionary Fund of the CCDF or the SSBG.
( f ) A State must follow the restrictions and prohibitions in effect for Federal TANF funds, including the provisions of § 263.11 of this chapter, in its use of contingency funds.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 102 

Observing the 100th anniversary of the birth of John Leslie ‘‘Wes’’ 

Montgomery and commemorating his contributions to jazz music. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. YOUNG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Observing the 100th anniversary of the birth of John Leslie 

‘‘Wes’’ Montgomery and commemorating his contributions to jazz music. 

Whereas, on March 6, 1923, John Leslie ‘‘Wes’’ Montgomery 

(referred to in this resolution as ‘‘Wes Montgomery’’) 

was born to Frances and Tom Montgomery in Indianapolis, Indiana; 

Whereas Wes Montgomery was naturally gifted in the musical arts and became proficient on the 4- and 6-string guitar in his youth; 

Whereas Wes Montgomery was a self-taught musician and 

learned to play guitar by listening to recordings of jazz 

guitarist Charlie Christian; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 102 ATS 

Whereas Wes Montgomery developed a unique fingerstyle 

playing technique uncommon to jazz guitarists in his day, 

using the thumb to play bass notes simultaneously with 

melodic lines; 

Whereas Wes Montgomery crafted diverse and unconventional 

rhythms that became a defining representation of bebopstyle jazz guitar; 

Whereas Wes Montgomery became famous after performing 

in jazz clubs in Indianapolis and was later recruited to 

tour with the Lionel Hampton Orchestra; 

Whereas, in 1957, Wes Montgomery joined his brothers 

Buddy and Monk to perform with other bands and record 

music with Pacific Jazz Records; 

Whereas, following the release of Wes Montgomery’s albums 

‘‘The Wes Montgomery Trio’’ and ‘‘The Incredible Guitar 

of Wes Montgomery’’, Wes Montgomery’s music became 

famous internationally, and his band traveled extensively 

in Europe in the spring of 1965; 

Whereas, in 1967, Wes Montgomery’s album ‘‘A Day in the 

Life’’ was rated the premier album on the Billboard Jazz 

Albums chart, 2nd on the Billboard R&B Albums chart, 

and 13th on the Billboard 200 chart; and 

Whereas, on June 15, 1968, Wes Montgomery passed at his 

home in Indianapolis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the contributions of John Leslie ‘‘Wes’’ 

3 Montgomery to jazz music continue to enrich the 

4 music industry and inspire countless musicians 

5 across the world; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 102 ATS 

1 (2) the legacy of John Leslie ‘‘Wes’’ Mont2 gomery as a great Hoosier musician should be recog3 nized and celebrated, especially on March 6, 2023, 

4 which marks the 100th anniversary of his birth. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
§ 2519.200 How may grant funds be used? Funds under a higher education program grant may be used for the following activities: (a) Enabling an institution of higher education, a higher education partnership or a consortium to create or expand an organized community service program that— (1) Engenders a sense of social responsibility and commitment to the community in which the institution is located; and (2) Provides projects for the participants described in § 2519.300. ( b ) Supporting student-initiated and student-designed community service projects.
( c ) Strengthening the leadership and instructional capacity of teachers at the elementary, secondary, and postsecondary levels with respect to service-learning by— ( 1 ) Including service-learning as a key component of the preservice teacher education of the institution; and
( 2 ) Encouraging the faculty of the institution to use service-learning methods throughout the curriculum.
( d ) Facilitating the integration of community service carried out under the grant into academic curricula, including integration of clinical programs into the curriculum for students in professional schools, so that students may obtain credit for their community service projects.
( e ) Supplementing the funds available to carry out work-study programs under part C of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 2751 *et seq.*) to support service-learning and community service.
( f ) Strengthening the service infrastructure within institutions of higher education in the United States that supports service-learning and community service.
( g ) Providing for the training of teachers, prospective teachers, related education personnel, and community leaders in the skills necessary to develop, supervise, and organize service-learning.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, March 12, 2007, 8 
a.m. to March 12, 2007, 5 p.m. Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase 
Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015 which was 
published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2007, 72 FR 6740.
    The meeting will be held on the same date at the Embassy Suites at 
the Chevy Chase Pavilion and will end at 3 p.m. rather than 5 p.m. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 26, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1020 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 402.42 Application format.

A State may determine the format of its application as long as it contains all the information required by § 402.41.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

 Notice of a partially open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# Time and Place:

Thursday, February 2, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

## Open Agenda Item

1. Request for Individual Delegated authority and Amendment to Short-Term Insurance Program for Iraq; and

2. Renewal of Short-Term Insurance Pilot Program for Africa.

## Public Participation

The meeting will be open to public participation for Items No. 1 and 2 only.

# Further Information:

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tele. No. 202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,

Acting General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 06-996 Filed 1-30-06; 3:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0081. KAMAAL AKEEM LEWIS v. THE STATE.

Under indictment for cocaine trafficking and possession of marijuana with intent

to distribute, Kamaal Akeem Lewis filed a motion to suppress the drugs seized from

him following a traffic stop. On June 11, 2018, the trial court denied his motion.

Thereafter, Lewis requested a certificate of immediate review, but the trial court denied

his request. Nonetheless, on July 19, 2018, Lewis filed an application for discretionary

review in the Supreme Court of Georgia, asserting that it had jurisdiction to consider

the merits of his application in accordance with Waldrip v. Head, 272 Ga. 572 (532

SE2d 380) (2000). The Supreme Court, however, determined that the application

presented no basis for its jurisdiction and transferred the case to this Court, noting that

“Waldrip involved a habeas proceeding and does not stand for the proposition that

[the Supreme Court] has subject matter jurisdiction whenever a trial court denies a

certificate of immediate review.” See Case No. S18D1568 (transferred August 14,

2018). We also lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30

days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d).

The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept

an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190

Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Because Lewis did not file his application in the

Supreme Court until 38 days after the entry of the order he seeks to appeal, his appeal

is untimely.

Even if Lewis’s application was timely, his failure to comply with the

September 20, 2018
interlocutory-appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) by obtaining a certificate of

immediate review also deprives this Court of jurisdiction. This Court will “not review

the unfettered discretion vested in the trial court in granting or refusing a certificate for

immediate review of interlocutory rulings.” B & D Fabricators v. D.H. Blair Inv.

Banking Corp., 220 Ga. App. 373, 375 (3) (469 SE2d 683) (1996). As set forth in

Waldrip, in rare cases, an appellate court can exercise its discretion to review an

interlocutory order without a certificate of immediate review, but only in “exceptional

cases that involve an issue of great concern, gravity, and importance to the public and

no timely opportunity for appellate review.” Waldrip, 272 Ga. at 575, 577 (1). And this

is not one of the rare cases in which ignoring the certificate requirement is warranted.

For these reasons, this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/20/2018
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1527 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a higher rate 

of tax on bonuses paid by certain businesses owned by the Federal 

Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose 

a higher rate of tax on bonuses paid by certain businesses owned by the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HIGHER RATE OF TAX ON BONUSES PAID BY 

4 CERTAIN BUSINESSES OWNED BY THE FED5 ERAL GOVERNMENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Internal Revenue 

7 Code of 1986 (relating to tax imposed on individuals) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1527 IH

1 ‘‘(j) TAX ON BONUSES PAID BY CERTAIN BUSI2 NESSES OWNED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any indi4 vidual who receives a covered bonus during the tax5 able year, the tax imposed by this section shall be 

6 increased by an amount equal to 60 percent of the 

7 covered bonus. 

8 ‘‘(2) COVERED BONUS.—For purposes of this 

9 subsection— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘covered 

11 bonus’ means any payment in the nature of a 

12 bonus which is paid by any person if at the 

13 time such bonus is paid the ownership interest 

14 of the Federal Government in such person is— 

15 ‘‘(i) in the case of a corporation, 79 

16 percent or more of the stock of such per17 son (by vote or value), 

18 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a partnership, 79 

19 percent or more of the profits interests or 

20 capital interests in such person, and 

21 ‘‘(iii) in any other case, 79 percent or 

22 more of the beneficial interests in such 

23 person. 

24 ‘‘(B) CONTROLLED GROUPS.— 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1527 IH

1 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

2 subparagraph (A), all persons treated as a 

3 single employer under subsection (a) or (b) 

4 of section 52 or under subsection (m) or 

5 (o) of section 414 shall be treated as one 

6 person. 

7 ‘‘(ii) INCLUSION OF FOREIGN COR8 PORATIONS.—For purposes of clause (i), in 

9 applying subsections (a) and (b) of section 

10 52 to this section, section 1563 shall be 

11 applied without regard to subsection 

12 (b)(2)(C) thereof. 

13 ‘‘(C) AGGREGATE BONUS MUST EXCEED

14 $10,000.—This subsection shall not apply with 

15 respect to bonuses paid to the taxpayer during 

16 the taxable year by a person described in sub17 paragraph (A) if the aggregate amount of such 

18 bonuses paid by such person with respect to the 

19 taxpayer does not exceed $10,000.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 33.3**[JPMORGAN CHASE LOGO]****MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA**          JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessingcompliance as of September 30, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through September 30,2006 (the “Reporting Period”), with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”), to the extent required by the relatedtransaction agreements and excluding the criteria set forth in 17 CFR 229.1122(d) (1)(ii)-(iv),(2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(i)-(ii), and (4)(iv)-(xiv) which the Asserting Party has concluded are notapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securitizationtransactions covered by this report (such criteria, after giving effect to the exclusionsidentified above, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). This report covers certain asset-backedsecurities transactions backed by residential mortgages, home equity loans, auto loans, credit cardreceivables, dealer floor plans, retail installment contracts and manufactured housing contractsfor which transactions the Asserting Party performs the Applicable Servicing Criteria as trustee,securities administrator or paying agent that were registered with the Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, where the related asset-backedsecurities were outstanding during the reporting period (the “Platform”), as listed in Appendix A.          The Asserting Party has (i) used the criteria set forth in 17 CFR 229.1122(d) to assess thecompliance by the Asserting Party with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand (ii) concluded that, other than as identified on Appendix B, the Asserting Party has complied,in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of September 30, 2006 and forthe Reporting Period with respect to the Platform, taken as a whole.          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued anattestation report for the Platform, stating that the Asserting Party has complied with theApplicable Servicing Criteria, except for material instances of non-compliance identified onAppendix B, as of September 30, 2006 and for the Reporting Period.   JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association     /s/ Kelly A. Mathieson   Kelly A. Mathieson, Managing DirectorDate: March 14, 2007  
 

 
**APPENDIX A**BA Master Credit Card Trust II