alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      |                                                                           |   |   |                                              |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|  By: |  /*s/                Peter J. Prygelski, III*                             |   |   |                                                   |
|      | **Peter              J. Prygelski, III, Chief Financial              Officer** |   |   | **August                09,                2007** |
|      |                                                                                |   |   |                                                   |

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.30


                                      NOTE


$1,000,000.00                                               San Jose, California

                                                                  April 27, 2000

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, David Smith ("Employee") promises to pay to Brocade
Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), or order, the
principal sum of one-million dollars ($1,000,000.00), without interest. Employee
acknowledges that the interest free nature of this loan may result in imputed
interest which is taxable to Employee as ordinary income and reportable by the
Company on the Employee's form W-2.

Subject to the paragraph below, principal shall be due and payable on April 27,
2004 (the "Due Date"). Payment of loan shall be made in lawful money of the
United States of America.

If for any reason, Employee ceases employment with the Company before Arpil 27,
2004, the principal balance at the time of termination shall become due and
payable (on a pro-rata basis) on the first day of each calendar quarter,
commencing with the first calendar quarter following the date of such
termination and ending on July 1, 2004.

Employee may at any time prepay all or any portion of the principal owing
hereunder.

This Note is subject to the terms of Employee's offer letter dated January 6,
2000, and the Employee's Relocation Bonus Letter dated April 27, 2000.

The holder of this Note shall have full recourse against the undersigned.

Should any action be instituted for the collection of this Note, the reasonable
costs and attorneys' fees therein of the holder shall be paid by the Optionee.



                                            ------------------------------------

                                            ------------------------------------
# CE2009279EN.01021501.xml

| 19.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 279/215 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 279/215

---

Mobile satellite services (MSS) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0219

P6_TA(2008)0219

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 May 2008 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (COM(2007)0480 — C6-0257/2007 — 2007/0174(COD))

(2009/C 279 E/39)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0480), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0480),

| — | having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0257/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0257/2007),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0077/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0077/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2007)0174

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 21 May 2008 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No 626/2008/EC.)

---
#### § 503.27 Reconsideration of opening or closing, or rescheduling a meeting.

The time or place of a Commission meeting may be changed following the public announcement only if the Commission publicly announces such changes at the earliest practicable time. The subject matter of a meeting, or the determination of the Commission to open or close a meeting, or portion of a meeting, to the public, may be changed following the public announcement only if a majority of the Commission members determines by a recorded vote that Commission business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the changes was possible, and the Commission publicly announces the changes and the vote of each member upon the changes at the earliest practicable time.
#### § 707.11 Eliminating discriminatory qualifications and selection criteria.

The Agency shall not make use of any qualification standard, eligibility requirement, or selection criterion that excludes particular classes of individuals with disabilities from an Agency program or activity merely because the persons are disabled, without regard to an individual's actual ability to participate. An irrebuttable presumption of inability to participate based upon a disability shall be permissible only if the condition would, in all instances, prevent an individual from meeting the essential eligibility requirements for participating in, or receiving the benefits of, the particular program or activity.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>    9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,693
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          28,184
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    260,172
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        487,054
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 795,908
<DEPOSITS>                                     438,681
<SHORT-TERM>                                   120,964
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,869
<LONG-TERM>                                     74,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 795,908
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,098
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,301
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,399
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,790
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,609
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      169
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,514
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,684
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,623
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      153
<RECOVERIES>                                        24
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,663
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,663
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Damage in foreign steamgenerator internals [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/96-09

Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000761979
 
Notice | Supplement01
 
March 23, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHRIS RUFER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00837 (CRC)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that [2] Plaintiffs’ Motion to Convene a Three-Judge Court is granted in part

as it relates to certification of constitutional questions to the en banc D.C. Circuit and denied in part 

as it relates to the convening of a three-judge court. It is further

ORDERED that [3] Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is denied. It is further

ORDERED that the parties shall jointly submit proposed findings of fact and constitutional 

questions for certification to the en banc D.C. Circuit on or before September 2, 2014.

SO ORDERED.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: August 19, 2014

Case 1:14-cv-00837-CRC Document 21 Filed 08/19/14 Page 1 of 1
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

District of South Carolina

 Kuhn for Congress )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-3337-PMD

 Federal Election Commission,

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

’ the plaintiff (name)_______ recover from the defendant (name) ________the amount of ____ dollars ($___ ), which

includes prejudgment interest at the rate of ______%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of ____%, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) 

recover costs from the plaintiff (name) .

O other: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Dixon’s R&R. It is ordered that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is

granted.

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior United States District Judge.

Date: December 16, 2014 CLERK OF COURT

 

 s/Elena Graham 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

2:13-cv-03337-PMD Date Filed 12/16/14 Entry Number 48 Page 1 of 1
§ 79.28 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the ALJ for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ shall make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**               **In connectionwith the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Highwater Ethanol, LLC (the“Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianKletscher, Chairman and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian Kletscher                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian  Kletscher, Chairman and President |
|   | Dated:  January 29, 2008            |

 

----
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders


of World
Energy Solutions, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-1140014) and Form S-3 (File No. 333- 147301) of our reports
dated March 12, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
World Energy Solutions, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in its
method of accounting for share based payments upon the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”,
effective January 1, 2006) and the effectiveness of World Energy Solutions,
Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting dated March 12, 2008, appearing
in this Annual Report to Shareholders, which is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of World Energy Solutions, Inc., for the year ended December 31,
2007.







/s/ UHY
LLP








Boston,
Massachusetts


March 12,
2008
#### Williams, appellant, v. Wieting.

*Pleadings*— *set-off—counter-cladm. Mvidence.*

In an action in a justice’s court by a veterinary surgeon for professional services, the defendant denied the complaint and gave notice of a set-off and recoupment, and at the trial evidence was offered by the defendant to show that he had purchased a team of horses relying on plaintiff’s professional recommendation and his promise to. be responsible if they did not prove to be as represented; and that the team were not as represented. This evidence was objected to on the ground that it was not a part of the transaction sued upon and could not be the basis of a set-off or recoupment. The evidence was admitted. Meld, correct. The evidence constituted a good counterclaim, and the objection not being made that the counter-claim was not properly pleaded, the pleading should be regarded as amended.

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Onondaga, affirming a judgment in a justice’s court, in favor of defendant. The action was brought by Edward P. Williams against John M. Wieting, to recover for professional services as a veterinary surgeon, and for medicine. The plaintiff claimed a judgment of $46.50. The defendant denied the complaint and gave notice of a set-off and recoupment. At the trial the defendant offered evidence to show that he had purchased a team of horses relying on plaintiff’s professional skill and judgment and upon his promise to be responsible for them if they did not prove to be as represented; and that the team was not as plaintiff represented, and was, in fact, of little value. The evidence was objected to on the ground that it was not a part of the transaction sued upon, and that it could not be the *440basis of a set-off or recoupment. The objection was overruled and the evidence received. The justice rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant for costs. The county court affirmed the judgment, and plaintiff appealed to this court

*R. H. Gardner,*for appellant.

*Gott & Garfield,*for respondent.

Gilbert, J.

The facts proved by the defendant constitute a good counter-claim. 2 Wait’s Pr. 431. Although it does not appear that the plaintiff was benefited by the sale of the horses, yet they were purchased by the defendant on the faith of his promise that if they were not as he represented he would be responsible. The risk incurred by the defendant in paying the price of the horses was a sufficient consideration for the defendant’s promise. It is not necessary in such a case that a benefit to the promisor should appear. It is sufficient that a risk is incurred by the promisee, and that the promise is the inducement to the transaction. *Sands*v. *Crooke,*46 N. Y. 564; Chit, on Cont. (11th Am. ed.) 28.

The counter-claim was not well pleaded. But the objection of the plaintiff was not put upon that ground. If it had been, no doubt the justice would have ordered an amendment. No injustice can be done by treating the pleading as having been amended. *Bate*v. *Graham,*11 N. Y. 237.

The plaintiff cannot complain that the judgment against him is too small.

*Judgment affirmed, with costs.*
#### § 75.469 Student activity costs.

Costs incurred for intramural activities, student publications, student clubs, and other student activities, are unallowable, unless specifically provided for in the Federal award.
# CE2009184EN.01011801.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/118 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/118

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008Noise level of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0043

P6_TA(2008)0043

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 February 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the driver-perceived noise level of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified version) (COM(2007)0588 — C6-0344/2007 — 2007/0205(COD))

2009/C 184 E/28

(Codecision procedure: codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0588),

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0344/2007),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0019/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
#### Clark v. People.

*Criminal evidence—burgla/ry—pa/rties connected in the commission of offense.*

Evidence that burglars’ tools, found at the place where the burglary was committed, were made for another jointly indicted with prisoner for the burglary and shown to be connected with the prisoner in its commission, *held*admissible to prove the guilt of the prisoner.

Error to the Erie sessions to review the conviction of the plaintiff in error, William Clark.

The plaintiff in error was jointly indicted with one Taylor for a burglary committed in April, 1873. The prisoners demanded separate trials. Taylor was first tried and convicted. On the trial of' plaintiff in error witnesses were called on behalf of the people to identify certain tools found in the place where the burglary was committed and to testify to the fact that Taylor ordered the tools at their establishment. Such other facts as are material appear in the opinion.

*Cook & Fitzgerald,*for plaintiff in error.

*Benj. H. Williams,*district attorney, for the people.

Gilbert, J.

The evidence that the burglarious implements found at the place of the burglary were made at Rochester for Taylor was not only relevant but very pertinent evidence to prove the guilt of the prisoner, if the prosecution gave other evidence sufficient to connect the prisoner with Taylor in the commission of the crime. Evidence to prove such connection between the prisoner and Taylor was given by the prosecution, and it was submitted to the jury. No exception was taken to the charge of the court.

We cannot consider the question whether the evidence was sufficient to implicate the prisoner, for it does not appear that all the testimony given on the trial is before us. The conviction must be affirmed.

*Conviction ajirmed.*