alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Integrated
 Performance Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended February 29,
 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the "Report"), I, D. Ronald Allen, Chief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 S1350, as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
 that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
 the Company.


 May 12, 2004

                               /s/  D. RONALD ALLEN
                               ------------------------------------
                                    D. Ronald Allen
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7577

REGINALD U. FULLARD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Loretta C. Biggs , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00742

- LCB

- JLW )

Submitted : July 28, 2022 Decided: August 29, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER , Circuit Judge , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Reginald U. Fullard , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7577 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Reginald U. Fullard seeks t o appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and d ismissing Fullard’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U .S. 473, 484 (2000))

. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Fullard’s informal brief , we conclude that Fullard has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ( “ The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief. ” )

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7577 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Colorado 

Republican Federal Campaign 

Committee (CRFCC) (A09-13) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on August 16,2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee 

(CRFCC), as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance 

Officer and Audit Division dated July 13,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affumatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Q Date ' Shawn Woodhead Werth J 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
.': (\I' .' . .,,'

,,"'('.,:, BEFORE THE DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 

### '4 c:

## 32 WASHINGTON, D. C
.

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form41, Schedule B-7) DOT-OST-1996-l203

MOTIONOF1lMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENTUNDERRULE 12 Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: VlRASB VAHIDI Senior Vice President
- Marketing and Planning and Chief Commercial Officer American Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 DFWAirport, Texas 75261

November 12, 2013 WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. Senior Vice President
- Government Affairs American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 FRANCIS C. HElL Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.comBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form41, Schedule 8-7) DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 3Q20l3 be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld frompublic disclosure. The information forwhich confidential treatment is requested pertains toAmerican's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements.

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report electronically tohttp://esubmit.rita.dot.gov

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data filed byAmerican. For the reasons stated in that letter, the current submission should also receive confidential treatment for 10 years.2
-
WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for aperiod of 10 years. Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc. November 12, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Scott MacCaughern, the Principal Executive Officer of Amnis Systems Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the  fiscal
         quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and


(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: November 13, 2003

/S/ Scott Mac Caughern
----------------------------------
Scott Mac Caughern
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
10.3


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is effective on June 6, 2020 (the “Effective
Date”), by and between Oragenics, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and Alan Joslyn (the
“Executive”) (Company and Executive may be referred to hereinafter individually, as a “Party”
or collectively, as the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement on June 6, 2016 and on June 6, 2018 the Parties entered
into that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement to extend the term thereof for an additional two year period ending
on June 6, 2020 (collectively the “Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive mutually desire to further amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional
two year period commencing on June 6, 2020 and ending on June 6, 2022; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive desire to maintain all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement and its incorporated exhibits except
as modified herein.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


	 	1.	Recitals. The Parties acknowledge
    and agree that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	Modification of Section 3 Term.
    Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, the Term (as defined in the Agreement) of the
    Agreement, shall be extended for an additional two (2) years beginning on the Agreement’s current expiration date and
    ending on June 6, 2022.
	 	 	 
	 	3.	Other Provisions Unaffected. Except
    as expressly modified and amended herein, all terms, conditions and covenants set forth in the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed
    and shall remain in full force and effect and unaffected by this Second Amendment; provided, however, that to the extent of
    any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, this Second Amendment shall control.
	 	 	 
	 	4.	Counterparts. This Second Amendment
    may be executed in any number of counterparts and it shall not be necessary for the parties to execute any of the same counterparts
    hereof. Counterparts to this Second Amendment may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf) or other transmission
    method and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective
    for all purposes.





 


[Signature
Page to Follow]


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Second Amendment to be effective as of the day and year first written above.


 


	 	COMPANY
	 	 	 
	 	Oragenics,
    Inc., a Florida corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    Michael Sullivan
	 	Name:
    	Michael
    Sullivan
	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	/s/
    Alan Joslyn
	 	Alan Joslyn
Exhibit 10.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 24, 2001

                              NDC AUTOMATION, INC.
                     ANNOUNCES RECEIPT OF PURCHASE ORDER FOR
                           LASER GUIDED VEHICLE SYSTEM

         Charlotte, NC, January 24, 2001, NDC Automation, Inc. (OTC Bulletin
Board "AGVS.OB") www.ndca.com announces receipt of a purchase order, from an
automobile manufacturer, for a turnkey Lazerway(R) LGVS (Laser Guided
Vehicle System) to be installed in North America. The order totaling
approximately $800,000, includes vehicles, controls hardware and software,
engineering services and related equipment.

         NDC Automation, Inc. provides an integrated package of controls
technology and related products for creating and servicing Automatic Guided
Vehicle Systems (AGVS). Additionally, NDCA provides turnkey AGVS solutions to
end-users and to system integrators. NDC's controls, hardware and software, are
designed for optimal flexibility and accuracy and are well suited for a broad
range of vehicle types.

                                       ###


For further information contact:

Claude Imbleau, Chief Operating Officer, CFO
704/362-1115
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1879 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1879

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and 
   reemployment rights for certain individuals ordered to full-time 
                          National Guard duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Employment Protection 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS FOLLOWING CERTAIN NATIONAL GUARD DUTY.

    (a) Reemployment Rights.--Section 4312(c)(4) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (D);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) ordered to full-time National Guard duty 
                under the provisions of section 502(f) of title 32 when 
                the period of duty is expressly designated in writing 
                by the Secretary of Defense as covered by this 
                subparagraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (F) of section 4312(c)(4) of 
title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
with respect to an individual ordered to full-time National Guard duty 
under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, on or after 
September 11, 2001, and shall entitle such individual to rights and 
benefits under chapter 43 of title 38 of such Code on or after that 
date.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1879

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for employment and 
   reemployment rights for certain individuals ordered to full-time 
                          National Guard duty.
```
§ 503.21 Notice of public observation. ( a ) A member of the public is not required to give advance notice of an intention to exercise the right of public observation of an open meeting of the Commission. However, in order to permit the Commission to determine the amount of space and number of seats which must be made available to accommodate individuals who desire to exercise the right of public observation, those individuals are requested to give notice to the Commission at least two business days before the start of the open meeting of the intention to exercise that right.
( b ) Notice of intention to exercise the right of public observation may be given in writing, in person, or by telephone to the official designated in § 503.29.
( c ) Individuals who have not given advance notice of intention to exercise the right of public observation will not be permitted to attend and observe the open meeting of the Commission if the available space and seating are necessary to accommodate individuals who gave advance notice of such intention.
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
  
  

NOMURA GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRODUCTS INC. 
 309 West 49th
Street 
 New York, NY 10019 
 (212) 667-9000 
 June 4, 2020 

Kaleyra, Inc. 
 2479 East Bayshore Road, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 
 Re: OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction

 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to the
Confirmation Re: OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction dated as of October 31, 2019 (the “Agreement”), between Kaleyra, Inc. (f/k/a GigCapital, Inc.) (“Counterparty”) and Nomura Global Financial Products Inc.
(“Nomura” and collectively with Counterparty, the “Parties”). Capitalized terms defined in the Agreement and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Agreement. 

The Parties hereby agree to extend the Valuation Date to the second anniversary of the Business Combination, as provided in the Agreement. 

This letter shall be governed by the law of State of New York, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. This letter may be executed and delivered in
counterparts (including by electronic or facsimile transmission), each of which will be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute a single agreement. 

[signature page follows] 












 Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by executing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning
it to Nomura. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	NOMURA GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRODUCTS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James Chenard

	Name: James Chenard
	Title: Managing Director


  

			
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	
	KALEYRA, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dario Calogero

	Name: Dario Calogero
	Title: CEO
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Tie Ming Li, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Vita Spirits Corp. (the "Company") hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2009.

*/s/ _Tie Ming Li__*Tie Ming LiChief Executive Officer

* *
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Haley and Senior Judge Coleman 

HALEY OF FARMVILLE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 0963-06-2 PER CURIAM 

 AUGUST 22, 2006 

BRUCE WAYNE STRICKLAND, SR. 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (James G. Muncie; Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, Muncie and Ross, 

P.C., on brief), for appellant. 

 (Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, on brief), for appellee. 

 Haley of Farmville appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

finding that Bruce Wayne Strickland, Sr. proved he continued to be disabled from performing the 

full duties of his pre-injury employment as a result of his compensable September 11, 2002 

injury by accident and awarding him temporary partial disability benefits beginning January 1, 

2004. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and hold that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the award for the reasons stated by the commission in its 

final opinion. See Strickland v. Haley of Farmville, VWC File No. 214-33-74 (April 11, 2006). 

We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00784

- CV

KARGES

- FAULCONBRIDGE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Ke ath GARRISON and Kassie Garrison,

Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI00853

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Court reporter Debra Jimenez’s request for an extension of time to file the record in this

accelerated appeal is granted. We order the record due December 4, 2019

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 4.2


 


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM


 


We have issued our
report dated June 9,
2020, with respect
to the financial statement of m+ funds
Trust, Series 1-11
 contained
in Amendment No. 1
to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File
No. 333-238107) and related Prospectus.
 We consent to
the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use
of our name as it appears
under the caption "Independent
Registered Public
Accounting Firm".


 


 


/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


Chicago,
Illinois


June
9, 2020
§ 2552.71 What requirements govern the assignment of Foster Grandparents? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Foster Grandparent assignments shall: ( a ) Provide for Foster Grandparents to give direct services to one or more eligible children.
( b ) Result in person-to-person supportive relationships with each child served. Foster Grandparent volunteers cannot be assigned to roles such as teacher's aides, group leaders or other similar positions that would detract from the person-to-person relationship.
( c ) Support the development and growth of each child served.
( d ) Be meaningful to the Foster Grandparent.
( e ) Be supported by appropriate orientation, training and supervision.
[64 FR 14126, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64652, Dec. 17, 2018]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ) 

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 14-1419 (CRC) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant, ) 

) 

AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK, ) 

) 

Intervenor-Defendant. ) 

__________________________________________) 

NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and 

Melanie Sloan, plaintiffs in the above captioned case, hereby appeal to the United States Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from the final judgment entered in this action on the 

19th day of September, 2016. 

Dated: November 14, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Stuart McPhail 

Stuart C. McPhail 

smcphail@citizensforethics.org

(D.C. Bar. No. 1032529) 

/s/ Adam J. Rappaport 

Adam J. Rappaport 

arappaport@citizensforethics.org

(D.C. Bar No. 479866) 

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 58 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics 

in Washington 

455 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Sixth Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20001 

Telephone: (202) 408-5565 

Fax: (202) 588-5020 

Attorneys for Citizens for Responsibility and 

Ethics in Washington and Melanie Sloan 

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 58 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that, on November 10, 2016, a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs’ notice 

of cross appeal was filed and served electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system upon the 

following counsel of record: 

Charles Kitcher 

Erin R. Chlopak 

Gregory J. Mueller 

Kevin Deeley 

Federal Election Commission 

Office of General Counsel 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Claire J. Evans 

Wiley Rein LLP 

1776 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 58 Filed 11/14/16 Page 3 of 3