alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. 12-15-00146-CR

BRITTANY MICHELLE BARRETT § IN THE

§

VS. § TWELFTH COURT 

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § OF APPEALS

MOTION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S PRO SE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this

Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's pro se brief, pursuant to Rule

38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County,

Texas.

2. The case below was styled State v. Brittany Michelle Barrett and numbered

114-0874-12.

3. Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon.

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of fifteen (15) years confinement in the Texas

Department of Criminal Justine - Institutional Division

5. Notice of Appeal was given on June 2, 2015.

6. The Clerk's Record was filed on June 3, 2015 and supplemented on June 5, 2015;

the Reporter's Record was filed on July 24, 2015. 

7. The Appellant’s Brief was filed on September 22, 2015. Appellant requests the

Court an extension of ninety (90) days. Appellant requests an extension of time

due to the following facts and circumstances.

A. The Appellant’s record was first made available to the Appellant on

October 26, 2015.

B. The Appellant is unable to meet the deadline for the following reasons:

1) limited access to the law library to a few hours a day, 

2) limited legal knowledge thereby slowing down research, and

ACCEPTED

12-15-00146-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

11/9/2015 2:53:10 PM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/9/2015 2:53:10 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
3) that she just received notice about Anders Brief on October 26,

2015.

8. Appellant requests an extension of time due to the above referenced facts and

circumstances. 

9. Appellant prays that this Court grant this Motion to Extend Time to File

Appellant’s Brief for a period of ninety (90) days, and for such other and further

relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

10. This Motion is being filed by counsel in accordance with communication received

from Ms. Barrett following her motion to extend time being found deficient due

to a failure to include a certificate of service.

Respectfully submitted,

Law Office of James W. Huggler, Jr.

100 E. Ferguson, Suite 805

Tyler, Texas 75702

Tel: (903) 593-2400

Fax: (903) 593-3830

By: /S/ James W. Huggler, Jr.

James W. Huggler, Jr.

State Bar No. 00795437

Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on November 9, 2015, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was served on Michael West, Smith County District

Attorney's Office, 100 North Broadway, Tyler, Texas 75702, by regular mail, fax, hand

delivery, or electronic filing. 

/S/ James W. Huggler, Jr.

James W. Huggler, Jr.
#### § 1148.1 What is the purpose and scope of these regulations?

This part contains the rules that the Arts Endowment follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Guidelines). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with the Arts Endowment's Privacy Act regulations as well as under this part.
IIA 

Calendar No. 229 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 42 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service 

relating to ‘‘Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint Processing—Policy Update’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WICKER, Ms. 

ERNST, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. VANCE, Mr. LEE, Mr. 

SCOTT of Florida, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Food and Nutrition Service relating to ‘‘Application 

of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination 

Complaint Processing—Policy Update’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 42 PCS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Food 

2 and Nutrition Service relating to ‘‘Application of Bostock 

3 v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint 

4 Processing—Policy Update’’ (issued May 5, 2022, as a 

5 memorandum, and a letter of opinion from the Govern6 ment Accountability Office dated June 5, 2023, printed 

7 in the Congressional record on June 7, 2023, on pages 

8 S1998–S2000, concluding that such memorandum is a 

9 rule under the Congressional Review Act), and such rule 

10 shall have no force or effect. 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 229 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 42 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapProcessing—Policy Update’’. County to Program Discrimination Complaint lating to ‘‘Application of Bostock v. Clayton submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service re- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
§ 81.21 Parties; General Counsel deemed a party. ( a ) The term party shall include an applicant or recipient or other person to whom a notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing has been mailed naming him a respondent.
( b ) The General Counsel of the Department of Health and Human Services shall be deemed a party to all proceedings.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vedanta Limited (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

|(i) | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2017 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 15, 2017

|    |  |                 
|--- |  | ----------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Tom Albanese

Name: Tom Albanese

Title: Chief
Executive Officer
§ 95.631 Cost identification for purpose of FFP claims. The conditions of this subpart apply notwithstanding the existence of an approved cost allocation plan. State agencies shall assign and claim the costs incurred under an approved APD in accordance with the following criteria: ( a ) *Development costs.* ( 1 ) Using its normal departmental accounting system, the State agency shall specifically identify what items of costs constitute development costs, assign these costs to specific project cost centers, and distribute these costs to funding sources based on the specific identification, assignment and distribution outlined in the approved APD;
( 2 ) the methods for distributing costs set forth in the APD should provide for assigning identifiable costs, to the extent practicable, directly to program/functions. The State agency shall amend the cost allocation plan required by subpart E of this part to include the approved APD methodology for the identification, assignment and distribution of the development costs.
( b ) *Operational costs.* Costs incurred for the operation of an ADP system shall be identified and assigned by the State agency to funding sources in accordance with the approved cost allocation plan required by Subpart E of this part.
( c ) *Service agreement costs.* States that operate a central data processing facility shall use their approved central service cost allocation plan required by OMB Circular A-87 to identify and assign costs incurred under service agreements with the State agency. The State agency will then distribute these costs to funding sources in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1747 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1747

     To authorize appropriations for the design, acquisition, and 
     construction of a combined buoy tender-icebreaker to replace 
                icebreaking capacity on the Great Lakes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2009

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize appropriations for the design, acquisition, and 
     construction of a combined buoy tender-icebreaker to replace 
                icebreaking capacity on the Great Lakes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Lakes Icebreaker Replacement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) five of the Coast Guard's Great Lakes icebreakers are 
        nearing the end of their useful lives;
            (2) two other Coast Guard icebreaking assets have 
        experienced difficulty in heavy ice conditions;
            (3) during the spring of 2008, United States-flag vessels 
        operating on the Great Lakes suffered more than $1,300,000 in 
        damages to their hulls because the Coast Guard did not have 
        enough assets available to keep Great Lakes shipping lanes 
        open;
            (4) during the 2006-2007 ice season, shipments of iron ore, 
        coal, and limestone on the Great Lakes exceeded 20,000,000 
        tons;
            (5) during the 2006-2007 ice season, the transportation of 
        10,400,000 tons of iron ore on the Great Lakes helped support 
        100,000 jobs at steel mills and 300,000 jobs at supplier 
        industries by keeping those industries working during the 
        winter season; and
            (6) the 6,400,000 tons of coal shipped on the Great Lakes 
        during the 2006-2007 ice season kept the Great Lakes region 
        supplied with electricity.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated $153,000,000 for necessary 
expenses of the Coast Guard for the design, acquisition, and 
construction of a combined buoy tender-icebreaker to replace 
icebreaking capacity on the Great Lakes, to remain available until 
expended.
                                 <all>
```
April 19, 2000
<P>
Richard I. Anslow, Esq.
4400 Route 9, 2nd Floor
Freehold, New Jersey 07728
<P>
     Re:     Agreement between Segway VI Corp. and
             Richard I. Anslow
<P>
Dear Mr. Anslow:
<P>
The following sets forth the agreement between Segway VI
Corp. ("SEGWAY") and Richard I. Anslow ("ANSLOW"):
<P>
     1.  ANSLOW agrees to purchase 4,000,000 restricted
common shares of SEGWAY at the value of $.0001 per share for
a purchase price of $500.00.
<P>
     2.  Upon the receipt of $500.00, SEGWAY will tender the
shares from treasury to ANSLOW.
<P>
     3.  ANSLOW represents that he is an "accredited
investor" as defined under the 1933 Securities Act.  In
addition, ANSLOW has been provided with access to all
documents of SEGWAY and has signed a subscription agreement
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
<P>
     4.  Notice shall be given by certified mail, return
receipt requested, the date of notice being deemed the date
of postmarking.  Notices, unless either party has notified
the other party of an alternative address as provided
hereunder, shall be sent to the address set forth herein.
<P>
     5.  In the event that any term, covenant, condition, or
other provision contained herein is held to be invalid, void
or otherwise unenforceable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the invalidity of any such term, covenant,
condition, provision or Agreement shall in no way affect
any other term, covenant, condition or provision or Agreement
contained herein, which shall remain in full force and
effect.
<P>
     6.  This Agreement contains all of the terms agreed
upon by the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.  This Agreement has been entered into after full
investigation.
<P>
     7.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of New Jersey
applicable to agreements made and to be performed within the
State of New Jersey without giving the effect to the
conflict of law principals thereof.
<P>
     8.  No amendments or additions to this Agreement shall
be binding unless in writing, signed by both parties, except
as herein otherwise provided.
<P>
     9.  Neither party may assign nor delegate any of its
rights or obligations hereunder without first obtaining the
written consent of the other party.
<P>
Very truly yours,
<P>
RICHARD I. ANSLOW & ASSOCIATES
<P>
By: /s/ Ross A. Goldstein
--------------------------------
     ROSS A. GOLDSTEIN
<P>
RAG/tp
<P>
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:        ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:
<P>
SEGWAY VI CORP.
<P>
By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow   By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow
--------------------------  ------------------------------
        RICHARD I. ANSLOW           RICHARD I. ANSLOW
        Secretary
<P>
§ 80.7 Conduct of investigations. ( a ) *Periodic compliance reviews.* The responsible Department official or his designee shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part.
( b ) *Complaints.* Any person who believes himself or any specific class of individuals to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may by himself or by a representative file with the responsible Department official or his designee a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the responsible Department official or his designee.
( c ) *Investigations.* The responsible Department official or his designee will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with this part. The investigation should include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the recipient has failed to comply with this part.
( d ) *Resolution of matters.* ( 1 ) If an investigation pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section indicates a failure to comply with this part, the responsible Department official or his designee will so inform the recipient and the matter will be resolved by informal means whenever possible. If it has been determined that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action will be taken as provided for in § 80.8.
( 2 ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section the responsible Department official or his designee will so inform the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
( e ) *Intimidatory or retaliatory acts prohibited.* No recipient or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 601 of the Act or this part, or because he has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under this part. The identity of complainants shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder.
(Secs. 601, 602, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252 (42 U.S.C. 2000d, 2000d-1))
[29 FR 16298, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 38 FR 17981, 17982, July 5, 1973]
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Various 2014 to Present Other. List below. 

Other/Additional Information: Discussions with Boeing to investigate and to fix the unsafe 

condition.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of PAETEC Holding Corp., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

1. the annual report on Form 10-K of PAETEC Holding Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PAETEC Holding
Corp.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    ARUNAS A.
CHESONIS                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Arunas A. Chesonis                                          
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    KEITH M.
WILSON                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Keith M. Wilson                                             
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 605.11 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity to which this part applies.
( 2 ) A recipient that receives assistance under the Education of the Handicapped Act shall take positive steps to employ and advance in employment qualified handicapped persons in programs or activities assisted under that Act.
( 3 ) A recipient shall make all decisions concerning employment under any program or activity to which this part applies in a manner which ensures that discrimination on the basis of handicap does not occur and may not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that adversely affects their opportunities or status because of handicap.
( 4 ) A recipient may not participate in a contractual or other relationship that has the effect of subjecting qualified handicapped applicants or employees to discrimination prohibited by this subpart. The relationships referred to in this subparagraph include relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient, and with organizations providing training and apprenticeships.
( b ) *Specific activities.* The provisions of this subpart apply to: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and the processing of applications for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) Leaves of absence, sick leave, or any other leave;
( 6 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient;
( 7 ) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 8 ) Employer sponsored activities, including those that are social or recreational; and
( 9 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
( c ) A recipient's obligation to comply with this subpart is not affected by any inconsistent term of any collective bargaining agreement to which it is a party.
[47 FR 8573, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51381, Aug. 26, 2003]
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RAMP SERIES 2006-RS5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
    Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
    Title:  Executive Vice President
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 26, 

2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01142-CV

ALTOM TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant

V.

MANUEL LOPEZ AND NINA LOPEZ INDIVIDUALLY AND MANUEL 

LOPEZ AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHRISTINA MARIE 

LOPEZ, DECEASED, Appellees

On Appeal from Probate Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 73804-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 28, 2013. On June 17, 

2014, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted. 
2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.