alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2009286EN.01017701.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/177 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/177

---

Thursday 19 June 2008Inland transport of dangerous goods ***II

P6_TA(2008)0302

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 June 2008 on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods (6920/3/2008 — C6-0160/2008 — 2006/0278(COD))

2009/C 286 E/51

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (6920/3/2008 — C6-0160/2008) (1),

1

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0852),

2

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0227/2008),

| 1. | Approves the common position; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position;

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

Official Journal of the European Union

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 117 E, 14.5.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  Texts Adopted, 5.9.2007, P6_TA(2007)0370.

2

---
#### § 57.3 Volunteer service programs.

Programs for the use of volunteer services may be established by the Secretary, or his designee, to broaden and strengthen the delivery of health services, contribute to the comfort and well being of patients in Department hospitals or clinics, or expand the services required in the operation of a health care facility. Volunteers may be used to supplement, but not to take the place of, personnel whose services are obtained through the usual employment procedures.
-rmXii 

WAYLAND 

TRAVE L 

308 Commonwealth Road, Wayland MA 01778 US 508-653-4600 or 800-552-0300 

Fax 508-655-5672 Email: Karen@waylandtravel.com 

March 8, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject; Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and 

Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by 

U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and 

Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's 

largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. 

American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of 

business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air service 

since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need 

your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from 

Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Karen Schragle 

Managing Director
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.105-46.106 [Reserved]
§ 225.1 Definitions. ( a ) The classification of subprofessional staff as community service aides refers to persons in a variety of positions in the planning, administration, and delivery of health, social, and rehabilitation services in which the duties of the position are composed of tasks that are an integral part of the agency's service responsibilities to people and that can be performed by persons with less than a college education, by high school graduates, or by persons with little or no formal education.
( b ) *Full-time or part-time employment* means that the person is employed by the agency and his position is incorporated into the regular staffing pattern of the agency. He is paid a regular wage or salary in relation to the value of services rendered and time spent on the job.
( c ) The term *Volunteer* describes a person who contributes his personal service to the community through the agency's human services program. He is not a replacement or substitute for paid staff but adds new dimensions to agency services, and symbolizes the community's concern for the agency's clientele.
( d ) *Partially paid volunteers* means volunteers who are compensated for expenses incurred in the giving of services. Such payment does not reflect the value of the services rendered, or the amount of time given to the agency.
[34 FR 1319, Jan. 28, 1969]
§ 75.448 Intellectual property. ( a ) *Patent costs.* ( 1 ) The following costs related to securing patents and copyrights are allowable: ( i ) Costs of preparing disclosures, reports, and other documents required by the Federal award, and of searching the art to the extent necessary to make such disclosures;
( ii ) Costs of preparing documents and any other patent costs in connection with the filing and prosecution of a United States patent application where title or royalty-free license is required by the Federal Government to be conveyed to the Federal Government; and
( iii ) General counseling services relating to patent and copyright matters, such as advice on patent and copyright laws, regulations, clauses, and employee intellectual property agreements (See also § 75.459).
( 2 ) The following costs related to securing patents and copyrights are unallowable: ( i ) Costs of preparing disclosures, reports, and other documents, and of searching the art to make disclosures not required by the Federal award;
( ii ) Costs in connection with filing and prosecuting any foreign patent application, or any United States patent application, where the Federal award does not require conveying title or a royalty-free license to the Federal Government.
( b ) *Royalties and other costs for use of patents and copyrights.* ( 1 ) Royalties on a patent or copyright or amortization of the cost of acquiring by purchase a copyright, patent, or rights thereto, necessary for the proper performance of the Federal award are allowable unless: ( i ) The Federal Government already has a license or the right to free use of the patent or copyright.
( ii ) The patent or copyright has been adjudicated to be invalid, or has been administratively determined to be invalid.
( iii ) The patent or copyright is considered to be unenforceable.
( iv ) The patent or copyright is expired.
( 2 ) Special care should be exercised in determining reasonableness where the royalties may have been arrived at as a result of less-than-arm's-length bargaining, such as: ( i ) Royalties paid to persons, including corporations, affiliated with the non-Federal entity.
( ii ) Royalties paid to unaffiliated parties, including corporations, under an agreement entered into in contemplation that a Federal award would be made.
( iii ) Royalties paid under an agreement entered into after a Federal award is made to a non-Federal entity.
( 3 ) In any case involving a patent or copyright formerly owned by the non-Federal entity, the amount of royalty allowed must not exceed the cost which would have been allowed had the non-Federal entity retained title thereto.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3018, Jan. 20, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

JAMES E. AKINS, et aI., ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Case Nos. 92-1864, 00-1478, 

) 03-2431 (RJL) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

) 

Dekndant ) 

) 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

6 ~y of September, 2010, hereby 

ORDERED that the plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED [#84 

in No. 92-1864, #14 in No. 00-1478, #26 in No. 03-2431]; and it is further 

ORDERED that the defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [#85 in 

No. 92-1864, #15 in No. 00-1478, #27 in No. 03-2431] is GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the above-captioned cases be DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:03-cv-02431-RJL Document 33 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 284.45 What are the contents and duration of the corrective action plan? ( a ) The State must include in the corrective action plan: ( 1 ) An outline of the manner in which the State or Territory will reduce its child poverty rate;
( 2 ) A description of the actions it will take under the plan; and
( 3 ) Any actions to be taken under the plan by the Indian tribe(s) (or Tribal consortia) operating a TANF program in the State.
( b ) The State must implement the corrective action plan until it determines and notifies us that its child poverty rate, as determined in § 284.20, is less than the lowest child poverty rate on the basis of which the State was required to submit the corrective action plan. The “lowest child poverty rate” means the five percent threshold above the first year in the two-year comparison period.
# CE2009286EN.01017801.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/178 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/178

---

Thursday 19 June 2008Road infrastructure safety ***I

P6_TA(2008)0303

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 June 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on road infrastructure safety management (COM(2006)0569 — C6-0331/2006 — 2006/0182(COD))

2009/C 286 E/52

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0569),

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0331/2006),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0050/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Thursday 19 June 2008P6_TC1-COD(2006)0182

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 19 June 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on road infrastructure safety management

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2008/96/EC.)

---
#### Emanuel Polito et al., Constituting the Firm of Polito Brothers, Respondents, *v.*Guiesseppe Pitriello et al., Appellants.

Appeal — filing of return.

The filing of a return to the Court of Appeals cannot be compelled until the appeal is fully perfected.

Reported below, 132 App. Div. 903.

(Submitted October 4, 1909;

decided October 12,1909.)

Motion to restore to the calendar an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 23, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

*Peter J. McGoldrich*for motion.

*K. C. McDonald*and *M. V. McDonald*opposed.

*Per Curiam.*

This is a motion to restore the appeal in this proceeding to the calendar, it having been dismissed under rule one for failure to file a return as therein required.

It appears that the justification of sureties executing the *518undertaking on the appeal is still pending and undetermined in the Supreme Court.

The filing of a return cannot be compelled until the appeal is fully perfected.

The motion should be granted, without costs.

Cullen, Cli. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Motion granted.
§ 2522.560 What are performance measures and performance measurement? ( a ) Performance measures are measurable indicators of a program's performance as it relates to member service activities.
( b ) Performance measurement is the process of regularly measuring the services provided by your program and the effect your program has in communities or in the lives of members or community beneficiaries.
( c ) The main purpose of performance measurement is to strengthen your AmeriCorps program and foster continuous improvement and to identify best practices and models that merit replication. Performance measurement will also help identify programmatic weaknesses that need attention.
[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
§ 681.40 How does the authority head dispose of an appeal? ( a ) The authority head may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment imposed by the ALJ in the initial decision or reconsideration decision.
( b ) The authority head will promptly serve each party to the appeal and the ALJ with a copy of his or her decision. This decision must contain a statement describing the right of any person, against whom a penalty or assessment has been made, to seek judicial review.
#### Amy N. Frank et al., Respondents, *v.*William Carter et al., Defendants. Frank H. Curry, Appellant.

*Frank*v. *Carter,*133 App. Div. 895, affirmed.

(Argued November 10, 1909;

decided November 30, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 15, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to relieve a purchaser at a foreclosure sale from his purchase of certain real property, or in the event that ' the title be found marketable that said purchaser be permitted to complete his purchase.

*Charles II. Stoddard*for appellant.

*Lewis M. Isaacs*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.
# National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, 2006

Sixty-five years ago, more than 2,400 Americans lost their lives in a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. On National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, we think of those who died on December 7, 1941, and honor all those who sacrificed for our liberty during World War II.

On that peaceful Sunday morning, our country suffered a vicious, unprovoked attack that changed the course of history. Though our Pacific Fleet was nearly destroyed, our citizens were inspired by the great acts of heroism from those who survived and from those who did not. In the days that followed, our grief turned to resolution, and America embarked on a mission to defeat two of the most ruthless regimes the world has ever known. We pledge to always remember the character and sacrifice of the brave individuals at Pearl Harbor. Their selfless service helped deliver a great victory for the cause of freedom and, ultimately, transformed adversaries into the closest of friends.

After the devastating attacks on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared, “We are going to win the war and we are going to win the peace that follows.” In the 21st century, freedom is again under attack, and young Americans have stepped forward to serve in a global war on terror that will secure our liberty and determine the destiny of millions around the world. Like generations before, we will answer history's call with confidence, confront threats to our way of life, and build a more peaceful world for our children and grandchildren.

The Congress, by Public Law 103-308, as amended, has designated December 7 of each year as “National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2006, as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn occasion with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I urge all Federal agencies, interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United States at half-staff this December 7 in honor of those who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor.                          ( print page 70854)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

[FR Doc. 06-9609

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### Askew *v.*Hogansville Cotton-Oil Company.

Argued November 6,

Decided November 16, 1906.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

*H. A. Hall, Isaac Jackson,*and *8. B. Atkinson,*for plaintiffs.

*Bvins & Spence,*for defendant.

Eish, C. J.

1. Affidavits, documents, and records introduced in evidence, but not incorporated in an approved brief of evidence so as to become a part of the record, can not be properly specified as parts of the record, so as to authorize transcripts thereof to be transmitted to this court. *Hancock*v. *McNatt,*116 *Ga.*297; *Sayer*v. *Brown,*119 *Ga.*539.

2. Affidavits, documents, and records submitted in evidence on the hearing should be incorporated in the bill of exceptions to review a refusal of an interlocutory injunction, or be attached thereto as exhibits, duly and properly identified, or be embodied in an approved brief of evidence and brought up as part of the record. Where none of these methods is adopted, but copies of such affidavits and documents are sent up as parts of the record, for the reason that the originals have marked thereon the word “Identified,” followed by the signature of the trial judge, such affidavits and documents have not been brought to this court in the manner prescribed by law, and therefore they can not be considered. *Eubank*v. *Eastman,*120 *Ga.*1048; *Roberts*v. *Heinsohn,*123 *Ga.*685.

3. Applying the rules above announced to the present ease, wherein the only question made by the assignment of error necessarily involves a consideration of the evidence, no adjudication therein can be had, and the writ of error must, therefore, be dismissed.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002******

          In  connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the  “Report”) of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the “Company”) for the  quarter ended March 31, 2007, each of the undersigned Doug Biles, the Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry Mereniuk, the Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best  of each of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

          (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.