alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 400.83 Mediation and fair hearings. ( a ) *Mediation* — ( 1 ) *Public/private RCA program.* The State must ensure that a mediation period prior to imposition of sanctions is provided to refugees by local resettlement agencies under the public/private RCA program. Mediation shall begin as soon as possible, but no later than 10 days following the date of failure or refusal to participate, and may continue for a period not to exceed 30 days. Either the State (or local resettlement agency(s) responsible for the provision of RCA) or the recipient may terminate this period sooner when either believes that the dispute cannot be resolved by mediation.
( 2 ) *Publicly-administered RCA programs.* Under a publicly-administered RCA program, the State must use the same procedures for mediation/conciliation as those used in its TANF program, if available.
( b ) *Hearings.* The State or local resettlement agency(s) responsible for the provision of RCA must provide an applicant for, or recipient of, refugee cash assistance an opportunity for a hearing, using the same procedures and standards set forth in § 400.54, to contest a determination concerning employability, or failure or refusal to carry out job search or to accept an appropriate offer of employability services or employment, resulting in denial or termination of assistance.
[65 FR 15448, Mar. 22, 2000]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1725** 

RANI MEHAR , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. 7

- ELEVEN, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:06

- cv - 01776

- AW )

Submitted : November 29, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Rani Mehar, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Anthony Welter, WELTER LAW FIRM, PC, Herndon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rani Mehar appeals the district court ’ s order granting

summ ary judgment in favor of Defendant in Mehar’s employment discrimination action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mehar v. 7

- Eleven , No. 8:06

- cv - 01776

- AW (D. Md . May 29, 2007) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case 1:17-cv-01576-RJL Document 7 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:17-cv-01576-RJL Document 7 Filed 09/25/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hans
Ephraimson, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 24, 2010 |  | /s/ Hans Ephraimson    
|                         |  | Hans Ephraimson        
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 400.70 Basis and scope.

This subpart sets forth requirements for applicants for and recipients of refugee cash assistance under both the public/private RCA program and the publicly-administered RCA program concerning registration for employment services, participation in social services or targeted assistance, and acceptance of appropriate employment under section 412(e)(2)(A) of the Act. A refugee who is an applicant for or recipient of refugee cash assistance must comply with the requirements in this subpart.

[60 FR 33602, June 28, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 15448, Mar. 22, 2000]
Case 1:11-cv-02168-CKK Document 36 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MARCH 2, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-13257

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00446-TWT-LTW-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ANGEL RUBEN RESENDIZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(March 2, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Wooldridge, appointed counsel for Angel Resendiz in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Resendiz’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 11283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1195]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 11283]]

                Memorandum of March 5, 2007

                
Assignment of Certain Functions Relating to 
                Procurement Sanctions on Persons Engaging in Export 
                Activities that Contribute to Proliferation

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of the Treasury[,] the Secretary of Defense[,] the 
                Secretary of Commerce[, and] the Director of National 
                Intelligence

                 By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 301 of title 3, United States Code, the 
                functions of the President under section 821 of the 
                Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 
                and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 6301) are assigned to the Secretary 
                of State, except that the function of the President 
                under section 821(c)(2)(A) is assigned to the Secretary 
                of Defense.

                In the performance of their respective functions under 
                this memorandum, the Secretaries of State and Defense 
                shall, as appropriate, consult each other, the 
                Secretaries of the Treasury and Commerce, and the heads 
                of other departments and agencies.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, March 5, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-1195
Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### § 75.363 Methods for collection, transmission and storage of information.

In accordance with the May 2013 Executive Order on Making Open and Machine readable the New Default for Government Information, the HHS awarding agency and the non-Federal entity should, whenever practicable, collect, transmit, and store Federal award-related information in open and machine readable formats rather than in closed formats or on paper.

[81 FR 3017, Jan. 20, 2016]
#### § 670.8 Foreign permit exception.

Section 670.4(d) and (e) shall not apply to transporting, carrying, receiving, or possessing native mammals, native plants, native invertebrates or native birds or to the introduction of non-indigenous species when conducted by an agency of the United States Government on behalf of a foreign national operating under a permit issued by a foreign government to give effect to the Protocol.

[86 FR 27987, May 25, 2021]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61131-61132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25448]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7617]

Determination and Certification Related to Colombian Armed Forces 
Under Section 7046(b) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, 
and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including under section 7046(b) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117) (``FY 2010 SFOAA''), as carried forward in the Full-Year 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) I hereby 
determine, certify, and report that the Government of Colombia is 
meeting the conditions contained in section 7046(b)(1)(B) and section 
7046(b)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related 
Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-8) (``FY 2009 
SFOAA'').
    Pursuant to section 7046(b) of the FY 2010 SFOAA, the Department of 
State has periodically consulted with

[[Page 61132]]

Colombian and internationally recognized human rights organizations 
regarding the Colombian Armed Forces' progress in meeting the above-
mentioned conditions, as provided in section 7046(c) of the FY 2009 
SFOAA.
    This Determination and Certification shall be published in the 
Federal Register, and copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate 
committees of Congress.

    Dated: September 7, 2011.
 William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-25448 Filed 9-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         312,682
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,950,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    9,721,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,389,729
<PP&E>                                         6,583,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,743,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,275,942
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,057
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,295,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,743,146
<SALES>                                        38,946,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,946,666
<CGS>                                          28,756,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,138,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (367,822)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             598,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,821,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                   685,764
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,136,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,136,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.28
        


</TABLE>
§ 900.306 Proposals normally requiring an EA. Proposals that normally require preparation of an EA include the following: ( a ) Initial field demonstration of a new technology; and
( b ) Field trials of a new product or new uses of an existing technology.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, :

:

Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 05-1851 (RMU)

:

v. : Document No.: 23

:

CLUB FOR GROWTH, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

DENYING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL CERTIFICATION;

DENYING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion contemporaneously filed herewith, it

is this 10th day of October, 2006,

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for an interlocutory appeal certification is

DENIED, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s request that this case be stayed pending the

appeal be DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

RICARDO M. URBINA

 United States District Judge

Case 1:05-cv-01851-RMU Document 31 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 630.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.
§ 77.4 Remedial actions. If, after the conclusion of the procedures set forth in § 77.5 or § 77.6 the Department finds that one or more of the conditions set forth in § 77.3 is or has been present, the Department may take the following remedial actions against a recipient organization's use of its letter of credit: ( a ) The Department may place special limits, restrictions, or controls upon the recipient organization's use of its letter of credit.
( b ) The Department may require more frequent or more detailed financial reporting from the recipient organization.
( c ) The Department may suspend, reduce, or terminate the recipient organization's use of its letter of credit.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

        Jacksonville IHC, Inc., a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant, is a Delaware Corporation, doing business as Jacksonville IHC, Inc.

        Jacksonville Savings Bank, SSB, an indirect subsidiary of the Registrant
and wholly-owned subsidiary of Jacksonville IHC, Inc., is a Texas chartered
savings bank, doing business as Jacksonville Savings Bank.

        JS&L Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of the Registrant and
wholly-owned subsidiary of Jacksonville Savings Bank, is a Texas chartered
corporation, doing business as JS&L Corporation.
Exhibit 32.1



                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                            18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                 SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Flexxtech  Corporation,  (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael  Cummings, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/  Michael  Cummings
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael  Cummings
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August  18,  2003
### Air Quality Monitoring Ne twork Plan – July 2013

B-1 APPENDIX B 

# Detailed Site Information Detailed information for air monitoring locations ar e included in site reports. For information on monitoring objectives, purposes and scales, plea se refer to the main text of this plan.

• Anaheim • ATSF (Exide) • Azusa • Banning Airport • Big Bear • Burbank • Closet World (Quemetco) • Compton • Costa Mesa • Crestline • Fontana • Glendora • Indio • La Habra • Lake Elsinore • LAX Hastings • Long Beach North • Long Beach South • Los Angeles • Mira Loma (Van Buren) • Mission Viejo • Norco • Ontario Fire Station • Palm Springs • Pasadena • Perris • Pico Rivera #2 • Pomona • Redlands • Rehrig (Exide) • Reseda • Riverside • Rubidoux • San Bernardino • Santa Clarita • Temecula • Uddelholm (Trojan Battery) • Upland • Van Nuys Airport • West Los Angeles

### Air Quality Monitoring Ne twork Plan – July 2014

B-2 Table 26 Selected POC, Parameter and Method Codes 1

1 Sampler and monitor locations along with specific method co des are identified in the deta iled site plans, Appendix B Instrument Pollutant POC Code Method Code Parameter Code

910 NATTS VOCs 4 172 43218, 43372, 43505, 43551, 43552, 43802, 43803, 43804, 43815, 43817, 43824, 43829, 43843, 43860, 45109, 45201, 45202, 45203, 45204, 45220, 45805, 45807.

910 PAMS VOCs 2, 7, 2, or 8 126 43000, 43102, 43202, 43203, 43204, 43205, 43206, 43212, 43214, 43216, 43217, 43220, 43221, 43224, 43226, 43227, 43230, 43231, 43232, 43233, 43235, 43238, 43242, 43243, 43244, 43245, 43247, 43248, 43249, 43250, 43252, 43253, 43261, 43262, 43263, 43280, 43284, 43285, 43291, 43954, 43960, 45109, 45201, 45202, 45203, 45204, 45207, 45208, 45209, 45210, 45211, 45212, 45213, 45218, 45219, 45220, 45225. ATEC 8000 PAMS Carbonyls 2 or 8 102 43502, 43503. GMW 1200 PM10 1,2,4, or 6 063 and 102 81102, 85101, 82203, 82308, 82403. Anderson RAAS PM2.5 Particulate 1 or 2 780 68108, 68107, 68106, 68105, 68104, 68103, 68101, 68109, 68102 Anderson RAAS PM2.5 Particulate 1 or 2 120 88101 Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 812 88301, 88306, 88302, 88403. Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 810 68108, 68107, 68106, 68105, 68104, 68103, 88502. Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 780 68101, 68109, 68102.

Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 811 88102, 88103, 88107, 88110, 88111, 88118, 88115, 88112, 88113, 88114, 88126,88128, 88132, 88134, 88136, 88152, 88180, 88176, 88154, 88165, 88168, 88169, 88160, 88161, 88179, 88164, 88183, 88167. Met One SASS Speciated PM2.5 11 or 12 816 88380, 88383, 88384, 88385, 88370, 88374, 88375, 88376, 88377. Xontech 924 CR6 4 or 5 920 12115 Xontech 924 Carbonyls 4 102 43502, 43503. Xontech 924 Metals 2 or 4 110 85102, 85103, 85105, 85110, 85128, 85132, 85136.
§ 2556.310 What are a VISTA sponsor's and AmeriCorps' supervisory responsibilities during a VISTA's term of service? ( a ) The VISTA sponsor is responsible for the day-to-day supervision and oversight of the VISTA.
( b ) AmeriCorps is responsible for ongoing monitoring and oversight of the VISTA sponsor's project where the VISTA is assigned. AmeriCorps is responsible for selecting the VISTA, assigning the VISTA to a project, removal of a VISTA from a project, and VISTA separation actions such as termination from the VISTA program.
**Exhibit 10.21**

 

**GENSYM CORPORATION**

 

**Description of Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors**

 

Directors of the Company who are also Company employees receive no additional or special compensation for serving asdirectors. 

 

Following is a description of the compensationarrangements for the Company’s non-employee directors. 

 

The Company pays its non-employee directors $12,000 annually, plus $1,000 for physical attendance at each meeting of the board of directors or $500 for participation in a board meeting telephonically. Non-employeedirectors also receive a $1,500 quarterly retainer for each committee on which the director serves. Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive stock options. 

 

In July 2003, the Company’s board of directors approved the temporary reduction of the board’scash compensation by 10% in conjunction with the temporary reduction of the salaries of senior management. The salaries of the Company’s executive officers were restored in April 2004, retroactive to January 1, 2004. Also in April 2004, theboard of directors approved the restoration of the board’s cash compensation to pre-reduction levels, retroactive to January 1, 2004. 

 

Since January 1, 2003, each of the Company’s non-employee directors must receive 10%, and may elect to receive up to 100%, of hisboard compensation in shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of cash. Each director must make his election in increments of 10% and may only change his election effective as of two specified times each year. 

 

Prior to January 1, 2005, upon initial election as adirector, each non-employee director of the Company was entitled to receive a nonstatutory option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and on the first day of each calendar quarter each non-employee director was entitled toreceive an option to purchase 5,000 shares. Commencing January 1, 2005, upon initial election as a director, each non-employee director of the Company will be entitled to receive a nonstatuory option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’scommon stock on and the first day of each calendar quarter each non-employee director is entitled to receive an option to purchase 2,500 shares. All options granted to directors are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of theCompany’s common stock on the date of the grant, are immediately exercisable and are exercisable for up to 10 years from the date of grant.
_ HEmRTMENTOF © fffflSs Membrandum 

U.& Department of 

Trtinsportation i m NOV - 2 A % U 2 

Office of the Secretary 

ofTranspatotlon 

Subject: Granting Request for Extension for Submission of Proposals for Date: November 2, 2010 

Essential Air Service at Macon, Georgia 

Docket DOT-OST-2007-28671 

: Dennis J. Devany, Chief ^ From: Uennis J. JJe Vany, Cmer ^^--^ Reply 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 ^ ^ 

of: 

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

On November 1, American Eagle Airlines requested an extension to submit subsidy proposals 

for essential air service in the case of Macon, Georgia. 

With community support, we are hereby granting the extension, not only for American Eagle, 

but for all potential applicants. 

proposals are now due no later than November 12, 2010.