alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.18


DALLAS S. CLEMENT                                Cox Communications, Inc.
Senior Vice President                            1400 Lake Hearn Drive, N.E.
Strategy and Development                         Atlanta, Georgia 30319
                                                 (404) 843-5677
                                                 (404) 847-6029 fax
                                                 dallas.clement@cox.com


                                January 11, 2001


                                                       [COX COMMUNICATIONS LOGO]


FAX AND FEDERAL EXPRESS

AT&T Corp.
295 North Maple Avenue
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Attention:        Marilyn Wasser, Esq.
                  Vice President -- Law and Corporate Secretary

Dear Marilyn:

         Reference is hereby made to the letter  agreement  dated March 28, 2000
among At Home Corporation,  AT&T Corp., Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications,
Inc. and certain of their respective  subsidiaries (the "Letter  Agreement") and
the term sheets attached thereto as Annexes A, B and C (collectively,  the "Term
Sheets").  Capitalized  terms used  herein and not  otherwise  defined  have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Letter Agreement and Term Sheets.

         In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement and
the Term Sheet  attached  thereto as Annex A ("Term  Sheet Annex A"), Cox hereby
provides  notice to AT&T of its exercise of the Put with respect to all Series A
Shares owned  directly or indirectly by Cox, which Series A Shares are presently
held by Cox @Home, Inc. ("Cox @Home").

         Cox is electing to have the  purchase  price under the Put paid in AT&T
Shares,  the precise number of which shall be calculated in accordance  with the
terms of paragraph 1(b) of Term Sheet Annex A. To facilitate such an arrangement
in accordance  with  paragraph  1(c) of Term Sheet Annex A, Cox proposes that it
exchange  its  shares of Cox @Home  with AT&T for AT&T  Shares in a  transaction
intended  to qualify  as a  tax-free  reorganization  under  Section  368 of the
Internal Revenue Code.  Based on current market  conditions Cox has assumed that
the  purchase  price  under the Put will be  calculated  on the basis of $48 per
Series A Share.

<PAGE>

         Notwithstanding  this notice,  our primary interest continues to be the
transaction  regarding  Excite@Home  that Cox and AT&T have been considering for
the past six  months.  This  notice  is being  sent in order to  preserve  Cox's
position  in the event that Cox and AT&T are not able to agree to terms for that
preferred transaction.

         Please feel free to call me at (404) 843-5677 to discuss the foregoing.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                              By: /s/Dallas S. Clement
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Dallas S. Clement
                                                 Title: Senior Vice President
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6262

FENTON L. TERRY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. LESLIE FLEMING, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Michael F. Urbanski , District Judge. ( 7:16

- cv - 00049

- MFU

- RSB )

Submitted : July 20, 2017 Decided: July 24, 2017

Before DUNCAN and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Fenton L. Terry , Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Fenton L. Terry seeks to a ppeal the district court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural ground s, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and c onclude that Terry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequa tely presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 CO~CU""liKCf.s 

# R~mr,s*OOI. 

# r'i~tUD~

ROU'IING ,'-M"OL condition on an aviation product. The MCAl describes the unsafe condition as: RlN 2120-AA64

originated by an aviation authority of another COW1try to identify and correct anunsafe above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) 

## iY! 

# c;_a0-ID [Docket No. FAA-2010-0273; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-195-ADj Amendment "OUTr~GSY""JOl 

# i&77",e;~ I) -

## (ff 

# -7 39-***"'*; AD 2010-**_*-2] 1~11'IAI'>SIC 

### L.I!~ IlX"" 

# s'h-,fro Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHCM8-400 Series Airplanes 

# .=M"isi~ AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation 

### IN~:'';;'''G.~ ~ATE (DOT). 

# It 

# ID /D ROt.' IN~ ,,'MIlOL ACTION: Final rule. - 

## 101 SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products liste 

## lNlTlA~l ~

Two in-service incidents have been reported on DHC-8 Series 400 aircraft in which the nose landing gear (NLG) trailing arm pivot pinretention bolt (part numberNAS6204-13D) was damaged. One incident involved the left hand NLG tire which ruptured on take-off. Investigation determined that the retention bolt failure was due to repeated contact ofthe castellated nut with the towing device including both the towbar and the towbarless rigs. The loss ofthe retention bolt allowed the pivot pin to migrate from its normal position andresulted incontact with and rupture ofthe tire. The loss ofthe pivot pin could compromise retention ofthe trailing arm and could result in aloss ofdirectional control due to loss ofnose wheel steering. The loss ofan NLG tire orthe loss ofdirectional control could adversely affect the aircraft during take off orlanding . INIlIAl.\'S"; DATE "Oull~G S\'MBClL

DATE



# • • • • • • • O._'TE
§ 2555.450 Athletics. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be treated differently from another person, or otherwise be discriminated against in any interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics offered by a recipient, and no recipient shall provide any such athletics separately on such basis.
( b ) *Separate teams.* Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a recipient may operate or sponsor separate teams for members of each sex where selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or the activity involved is a contact sport. However, where a recipient operates or sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex but operates or sponsors no such team for members of the other sex, and athletic opportunities for members of that sex have previously been limited, members of the excluded sex must be allowed to try out for the team offered unless the sport involved is a contact sport. For the purposes of these Title IX regulations, contact sports include boxing, wrestling, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( c ) *Equal opportunity.* ( 1 ) A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics shall provide equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. In determining whether equal opportunities are available, the designated agency official will consider, among other factors: ( i ) Whether the selection of sports and levels of competition effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of members of both sexes;
( ii ) The provision of equipment and supplies;
( iii ) Scheduling of games and practice time;
( iv ) Travel and per diem allowance;
( v ) Opportunity to receive coaching and academic tutoring;
( vi ) Assignment and compensation of coaches and tutors;
( vii ) Provision of locker rooms, practice, and competitive facilities;
( viii ) Provision of medical and training facilities and services;
( ix ) Provision of housing and dining facilities and services;
( x ) Publicity.
( 2 ) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, unequal aggregate expenditures for members of each sex or unequal expenditures for male and female teams if a recipient operates or sponsors separate teams will not constitute noncompliance with this section, but the designated agency official may consider the failure to provide necessary funds for teams for one sex in assessing equality of opportunity for members of each sex.
( d ) *Adjustment period.* A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics at the elementary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics at the secondary or postsecondary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel, GEI Genotyping and Coordinating Centers.                     

*Date:*                         March 30, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-0838.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

      ( print page 10772)    
Dated: March 5, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1112 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
##### 



Exhibit No. 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of barnesandnoble.com inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Kevin M. Frain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Kevin M. Frain                          
|    | 
|    |  | Kevin M. Frain                              
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and                 
|    |  | Vice President, Operations                  
|    |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|    |  | barnesandnoble.com inc.                     
|    |  | November 14, 2003                           

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 690.115 IRB records. ( a ) An institution, or when appropriate an IRB, shall prepare and maintain adequate documentation of IRB activities, including the following: ( 1 ) Copies of all research proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany the proposals, approved sample consent forms, progress reports submitted by investigators, and reports of injuries to subjects.
( 2 ) Minutes of IRB meetings, which shall be in sufficient detail to show attendance at the meetings; actions taken by the IRB; the vote on these actions including the number of members voting for, against, and abstaining; the basis for requiring changes in or disapproving research; and a written summary of the discussion of controverted issues and their resolution.
( 3 ) Records of continuing review activities, including the rationale for conducting continuing review of research that otherwise would not require continuing review as described in § 690.109(f)(1).
( 4 ) Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and the investigators.
( 5 ) A list of IRB members in the same detail as described in § 690.108(a)(2).
( 6 ) Written procedures for the IRB in the same detail as described in § 690.108(a)(3) and (4).
( 7 ) Statements of significant new findings provided to subjects, as required by § 690.116(c)(5).
( 8 ) The rationale for an expedited reviewer's determination under § 690.110(b)(1)(i) that research appearing on the expedited review list described in § 690.110(a) is more than minimal risk.
( 9 ) Documentation specifying the responsibilities that an institution and an organization operating an IRB each will undertake to ensure compliance with the requirements of this policy, as described in § 690.103(e).
( b ) The records required by this policy shall be retained for at least 3 years, and records relating to research that is conducted shall be retained for at least 3 years after completion of the research. The institution or IRB may maintain the records in printed form, or electronically. All records shall be accessible for inspection and copying by authorized representatives of the Federal department or agency at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
EPA and the Phosphine Producers Association

Registration Review DCI Discussion

December 8, 2014; 10:00 am to 12:00 pm

Potomac Yard South – 9100

Agenda:

‐ Introductions

‐ Overview of phosphine and the metal phosphides

o Formulations/products

o Uses

o Safety

‐ Overview of EPA registration review data requirements

o Modeling discussion

o Status of protocol development

o Timeframe for protocol/report submissions

o Test substances required

o Study specific concerns/questions

‐ Wrap‐up/discussion

Meeting Summary:

The Office of Pesticide Programs met with members of the Phosphine Producers Association (PPA) for

an overview of phosphine and metal phosphide formulations and uses.  The registration review data

call‐ins were sent to registrants on August 6, 2014, and 90‐day responses were received at the end of

November.  Modeling questions and questions on protocol timing were discussed at the meeting.  The

EPA will continue its dialogue with the PPA on protocol development throughout process.

Meeting Participants:

EPA:  Dana Friedman, Elissa Reaves, Gene Benbow, Venus Eagle, Meredith Laws, Colwell Cook, Steven

Wente, Michael Lowit, Meghan Radtke, Cathryn Britton, Hannah Pope‐Varsalona, Sujatha Sankula,

Thurston Morton, Marquea King, James S. Miller

PPA: Fred Smith, Cinda Bell, Jim Damico, Susan Nichols, Dennis Ryman, Patti Vernon, Mike DePalo, Wes

Long, Thadd Bigler, Roger Sanborn, David Olson, Diane Fago, Joel Seckar, Susan Youngren
#### The City of New York, Respondent, *v.*Charles P. Holzderber, Appellant.

*Gity of New York*v. *Ilolzderber,*122 App. Div. 918, affirmed.

(Argued November 17, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *508December 24, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the decree of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action under section 936 of the charter of the city of New York (L. 1901, ch. 436) to enforce the collection of a personal tax.

*W. W. Niles*for appellant.

*Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Thomas F. Noonan*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 25

CONVENED JANUARY 4, 2007

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

THE JUDICIARY 

27 19 John Alfred Jarvey, of Iowa, to be United States 

District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, 

vice Ronald E. Longstaff, retired. 

Feb 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

28 21 Sara Elizabeth Lioi, of Ohio, to be United States 

District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, 

vice Lesley Brooks Wells, retired. 

Feb 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

36 4 John Preston Bailey, of West Virginia, to be 

United States District Judge for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, vice Frederick P. 

Stamp, Jr., retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

37 32 Otis D. Wright II, of California, to be United 

States District Judge for the Central District of 

California, vice Gary L. Taylor, retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

38 33 George H. Wu, of California, to be United States 

District Judge for the Central District of 

California, vice Ronald S. W. Lew, retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 39 69 Stanley Davis Phillips, of North Carolina, to be 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary 

of the United States of America to the Republic 

of Estonia. 

Mar 06, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

* 40 192 William B. Wood, of New York, a Career Member 

of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of MinisterCounselor, to be Ambassador Extraordinary 

and Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. 

Mar 06, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-63008, 333-38488, 333-38464, 333-53455, 333-29707, 333-03863, 333-03861, 333-03857, 333-03855) of Gensym Corporation of our report dated March 18, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appearsin this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 31, 2003
#### § 83.5 Effect of title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

The obligations imposed by this part are independent of obligations imposed by or pursuant to title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
#### § 506.1 “Civilian American citizen” defined.

*Civilian American citizen* means any person who, being then a citizen of the United States, was captured in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam conflict by any force hostile to the United States, or who went into hiding in Southeast Asia in order to avoid capture or internment by any such hostile force.