alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Laroo, Chris

From: O'Connor, Mike@ARB [moconnor@arb.ca.gov]

Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 5:23 PM

To: Laroo, Chris; Giedrius Ambrozaitis; Julia Rege; Hughes, Paul@ARB

Cc: Good, David

Subject: RE: PHEV Presentation from Yesterday's Meeting

Good meeting yesterday – thx all. Below is the list of ARB attendees: 

1. Paul Hughes* LEV III 

phughes@arb.ca.gov 

2. Sarah Carter* LEV III 

scarter@arb.ca.gov 

3. Mike McCarthy Vehicle Program Specialist (reports to DEO Alberto Ayala) 

mmcarth@arb.ca.gov 

4. Thu Vo Manager, Vehicle Emissions Testing Section 

tvo@arb.ca.gov 

5. Wayne McMahon Manager, Engineering Testing and Facility Support Section 

wmcmahon@arb.ca.gov 

6. Mang Zhang Manager, Specialty Vehicle and Engine Testing Section 

mzhang@arb.ca.gov 

7. Mark Fuentes Chief, Vehicle and Engine Testing Branch 

mfuentes@arb.ca.gov 

8. Allen Pham* Evaporative Emissions Testing Section 

atpham@arb.ca.gov 

9. Duc Nguyen Manager, On-Road Lt-Duty Certification Section 

dnguyen@arb.ca.gov 

10. Depinder Paul* Lt-Duty Certification 

dpaul@arb.ca.gov 

11. Shobna Sahni Lt-Duty Certification 

ssahni@arb.ca.gov 

12. Bill McDuffee* Lt-Duty Certification 

wmcduffe@arb.ca.gov 

13. Lucky Benedict Lt-Duty Certification 

nbenedic@arb.ca.gov

14. Steve Hada Lt-Duty Certification 

shada@arb.ca.gov 

15. Seong Kim Lt-Duty Certification 

skim@arb.ca.gov 

16. Tom Valencia Manager, In-Use Compliance Section 

tvalenci@arb.ca.gov 

17. Mike O’Connor* Manager, Evaporative Emissions Testing Section 

moconnor@arb.ca.gov 

*PHEV Test Procedures Development Team 

Mike O'Connor

 

Manager
2

Evaporative Emissions Testing Section

MSOD/California Air Resources Board

(626) 575-6814

From: Laroo, Chris [mailto:laroo.chris@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 4:32 AM 

To: Giedrius Ambrozaitis; Julia Rege; Hughes, Paul@ARB; O'Connor, Mike@ARB 

Cc: Good, David 

Subject: PHEV Presentation from Yesterday's Meeting 

Attached is the original and in‐meeting modified version of the PHEV presentation that EPA and ARB put together for the

meeting.  Also attached is the sign in sheet.

Regards,

Chris Laroo

Environmental Protection Specialist

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

Assessment and Standards Division

2000 Traverwood Dr.

Ann Arbor, MI 48105

(734) 214‐4937

(734) 214‐4055 (fax)

Email: laroo.chris@epa.gov
§ 73.735-307 Use of official information. ( a ) The public interest requires that certain information in the possession of the Government be kept confidential, and released only with general or specific authority under Department or operating component regulations. Such information may involve the national security or be private, personal, or business information which has been furnished to the Government in confidence. In addition, information in the possession of the Government and not generally available may not be used for private gain. The following paragraphs set forth the rules to be followed by Department employees in handling information in official files or documents: ( 1 ) *Classified information.* Employees who have access to information which is classified for security reasons in accordance with Executive Order 12065 are responsible for its custody and safekeeping, and for assuring that it is not disclosed to unauthorized persons. See the Department's Security Manual, Part 3 for details.
( 2 ) *Security and investigative information.* Security and investigative data received from Government agencies or other sources for official use only within the Department or developed under a pledge of confidence is not to be divulged to unauthorized persons or agencies.
( 3 ) *Information obtained in confidence.* Certain Department units (e.g., Food and Drug Administration, and the Social Security Administration) obtain in the course of their program activities certain information from businesses or individuals which they are forbidden by law from disclosing. These statutory prohibitions are found in 21 U.S.C. 331j, and 18 U.S.C. 1905. Each employee is responsible for observing these laws.
( 4 ) *Use of information for private gain.* Government employees are sometimes able to obtain information about some action the Government is about to take or some other matter which is not generally known. Information of this kind shall not be used by the employee to further his or her or someone else's private financial or other interests. Such a use of official information is clearly a violation of a public trust. Employees shall not, directly or indirectly, make use of, or permit others to make use of, for the purpose of furthering any private interest, official information not made available to the general public.
( b ) The Privacy Act provides criminal penalties for an employee who willfully discloses individually identifiable information from records, disclosure of which is prohibited by that Act. 5 U.S.C. 552a(i).
#### § 506.12 Membership in the Armed Forces of the United States; establishment of.

Regular appointment, enrollment, enlistment or induction in the Armed Forces of the United States must be established by certification obtained from the Department of Defense.
§ 79.34 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, *e.g.,* to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ shall exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement shall be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 79.24.
# CE2010045EN.01018701.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/187 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/187

---

Disclosure requirements for medium-sized companies and obligation to draw up consolidated accounts ***I

P6_TA(2008)0631

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards certain disclosure requirements for medium-sized companies and obligation to draw up consolidated accounts (COM(2008)0195 — C6-0173/2008 — 2008/0084(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/59)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0195), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0195),

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 44(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0173/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 44(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0173/2008),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0462/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0462/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.   Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2008)0084

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 18 December 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards certain disclosure requirements for medium-sized companies and the obligation to draw up consolidated accounts

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/49/EC.)

---
Editorial Note on Part 99
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 99 appear at 63 FR 39998, July 24, 1998.

§ 99.25 Evidence. ( a ) Testimony. Testimony shall be given orally under oath or affirmation by witnesses at the hearing. Witnesses shall be available at the hearing for cross-examination by all parties.
( b ) Stipulations and exhibits. Two or more parties may agree to stipulations of fact. Such stipulations, or any exhibit proposed by any party, shall be exchanged at the prehearing conference or otherwise prior to the hearing if the presiding officer so requires.
( c ) Rules of evidence. Technical rules of evidence shall not apply to hearings conducted pursuant to this part, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to test by cross-examination shall be applied where reasonably necessary by the presiding officer. A witness may be cross-examined on any matter material to the proceeding without regard to the scope of direct examination. The presiding officer may exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by the parties, and opportunity shall be given to refute facts and arguments advanced on either side of the issues.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Marie J. Toulantis, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A ofbarnesandnoble.com inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date:April 27, 2004      By: /s/ Marie J. Toulantis       Marie J. ToulantisChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)barnesandnoble.com inc.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 October 30, 2008

 ECO-9

 

No. 08-4340

 

PHILIP J. BERG, Appellant

v.

 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, et al.

 

(E.D. Pa. No. 08-cv-4083)

 

 

PRESENT: AMBRO and JORDAN, Circuit Judges

1) Emergency Motion by Appellant Philip J. Berg for an Immediate

Injunction To Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008

Pending Resolution of the Petitioner’s Appeal;

2) Response on behalf of Appellee Barack Obama with Exhibits to

Appellant’s Motion for Injunction To Stay the Presidential Election

of November 4, 2008; 

3) Response on behalf of Appellee Federal Election Commission with

Exhibit to Motion for an Immediate Injunction To Stay the

Presidential Election of November 4, 2008.

 

Carolyn Hicks, Case Manager

267-299-4926

 O R D E R 

Plaintiff-Appellant's Emergency Motion for an Immediate Injunction To Stay the Presidential

Election of November 4, 2008 Pending Resolution of the Petitioner's Appeal is hereby

(Continued)
ECO-9

Page 2

Berg v. Obama

C.A. No. 08-4340

 O R D E R 

DENIED. For the reasons ably expressed by the District Court—and not addressed in

Plaintiff-Appellant’s Emergency Motion—it appears that Plaintiff-Appellant lacks standing

to challenge Senator Barack Obama's candidacy for the Presidency of the United States.

Accordingly, Plaintiff-Appellant has not shown a likelihood of success with respect to his

appeal.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: October 31, 2008

cc: Philip Berg, Esq.

 John P. Lavelle, Jr., Esq.

 Benjamin A. Streeter, III, Esq.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
          OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
          TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  In
          connection with the quarterly report of Pacific Sands, Inc. (the "Company")
          on
          Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, Michael D. Michie
          hereby
          certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
          906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
   1.
          The
          quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   2.
          The
          information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        December 1, 2006
 
 /s/
                  Michael D.
                  MichieMichael
                  D. Michie,Chief
                  Financial Officer
#### § 702.10 Voluntary witnesses at public session of a hearing.

A person who has not been subpoenaed and who has not been afforded an opportunity to appear pursuant to § 702.6 may be permitted, in the discretion of the Commission, to make an oral or written statement at a public session of a hearing. Such person may be questioned to the same extent and in the same manner as other witnesses before the Commission.
§ 79.19 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the ALJ shall schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplication of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact__, or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery;
( 9 ) The time and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The ALJ may issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
               RFMSI SERIES 2006-SA2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
August 1, 2006, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of June 1,  2006 (as  amended  from  time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential Funding Securities I, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC (formerly  Residential Funding  Corporation),  as master servicer,  and U.S.
Bank National Association, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has duly  executed  this
Certificate this 26th day of March 2007.

By:        /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        ----------------------------
        Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
        Title: Managing Director
§ 605.7 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall designate at least one person to coordinate its efforts to comply with this part.
( b ) *Adoption of grievance procedures.* A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall adopt grievance procedures that incorporate appropriate due process standards and that provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by this part. Such procedures need not be established with respect to complaints from applicants for employment or from applicants for admission to postsecondary educational institutions.
#### Martin *v.*City of Gainesville.

Argued October 17,-

Decided November 8, 1906.

Certiorari. Before Judge Kimsey. Hall superior court. July 26, 1906.

*H. R.*Bean, for plaintiff in error. *J. G.*Collins, contra.

Beck, J.

1. The corporate limits of the City of Gainesville having been prescribed by an act of the legislature (Acts 1877, p. 163), they would not be contracted by mere acquiescence of the city council in a survey which fixed and marked limits of less extent than those prescribed and established by the legislative act, even though such survey had been authorized by an ordinance of the city council and acquiesced in for a period of thirty years. *Norrell*v. *Augusta Railway & Electric Co.,*116 *Ga.*313; 20 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 1150.

2. A part of the evidence introduced to prove the making of a certain survey, and the marking of the lines thereof by posts, being competent and admissible, it was not error to overrule an objection based on the ground that the evidence was illegal, which went to the whole of the evidence, and did not point out that part which was illegal and inadmissible. The proper practice is to point out the inadmissible portion and object to it specifically. *Ray*v. *Camp,*110 *Ga.*818.

3. It being a material subject of inquiry whether or not a building was within the limits of a certain survey, it was error for the trial court to permit a witness, over proper objection made, to testify that the surveyor had told him that the building was included in the lines fixed by that survey.

4. Before the defendant can be convicted of a violation of an ordinance of the City of Gainesville, it should be made to appear by competent and sufficient evidence that the act alleged to have been done in violation of such ordinance was within the limits of said city as prescribed in its charter. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 84.69 Illegal use of drugs. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part does not prohibit discrimination against an individual based on that individual's current illegal use of drugs.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of illegal use of drugs against an individual who is not engaging in current illegal use of drugs and who— ( i ) Has successfully completed a supervised drug rehabilitation program or has otherwise been rehabilitated successfully;
( ii ) Is participating in a supervised rehabilitation program; or
( iii ) Is erroneously regarded as engaging in such use.
( b ) *Services provided under the Rehabilitation Act.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not exclude an individual on the basis of that individual's current illegal use of drugs from the benefits of programs and activities providing health services and services provided under subchapters I, II, and III of the Rehabilitation Act, if the individual is otherwise entitled to such services.
( 2 ) A drug rehabilitation or treatment program may deny participation to individuals who engage in illegal use of drugs while they are in the program.
( c ) *Drug testing.* ( 1 ) This part does not prohibit the recipient from adopting or administering reasonable policies or procedures, including but not limited to drug testing, designed to ensure that an individual who formerly engaged in the illegal use of drugs is not now engaging in current illegal use of drugs.
( 2 ) Nothing in this paragraph (c) shall be construed to encourage, prohibit, restrict, or authorize the conduct of testing for the illegal use of drugs.
§ 670.5 Exception in extraordinary circumstances. ( a ) *Emergency exception.* No act described in § 670.4 shall be unlawful if the person committing the act reasonably believed that the act was committed under emergency circumstances involving the safety of human life or of ships, aircraft, or equipment or facilities of high value, or the protection of the environment.
( b ) *Aiding or salvaging native mammals or native birds.* The prohibition on taking shall not apply to any taking of native mammals or native birds if such action is necessary to: ( 1 ) Aid a sick, injured or orphaned specimen;
( 2 ) Dispose of a dead specimen; or
( 3 ) Salvage a dead specimen which may be useful for scientific study.
( c ) *Reporting.* Any actions taken under the exceptions in this section shall be reported promptly to the Director.