Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices 10557 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (‘‘EDIS’’) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—In October 2004, the 

Commission determined that there was 

no reasonable indication that a U.S. 

industry was materially injured or 

threatened with material injury by 

reason of imports of certain polyvinyl 

alcohol from Taiwan that were allegedly 

sold in the United States at less than fair 

value. The Commission’s determination 

was appealed to the CIT. The CIT issued 

an opinion in the matter on January 29, 

2007. Celanese Chemicals, Ltd. v. 

United States, Slip Op. 07–16 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade Jan. 29, 2007). In its opinion, the 

CIT remanded the matter to the 

Commission for further proceedings not 

inconsistent with that opinion. 

Participation in the proceeding.—

Only those persons who were interested 

parties to the original investigation (i.e., 

persons listed on the Commission 

Secretary’s service list) and were parties 

to the appeal may participate in the 

remand proceeding. Such persons need 

not make any additional filings with the 

Commission to participate in the 

remand proceeding. Business 

proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) referred 

to during the remand proceeding will be 

governed, as appropriate, by the 

administrative protective order issued 

in the original investigation. 

Written submissions.—The 

Commission is not reopening the record 

in this proceeding for submission of 

new factual information. The 

Commission will, however, permit the 

parties to file comments solely 

pertaining to the inquiries that are the 

subject of the CIT’s remand instructions. 

Comments should be limited to no more 

than twenty (20) double-spaced and 

single-sided pages of textual material. 

The parties may not submit any new 

factual information and may not address 

any issue other than the inquiries that 

are the subject of the CIT’s remand 

instructions. Any such comments must 

be filed with the Commission no later 

than March 12, 2007. 

All written submissions must conform 

with the provisions of section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (Nov. 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

investigation must be served on all other 

parties to the investigation (as identified 

by either the public or BPI service list), 

and a certificate of service must be 

timely filed. The Secretary will not 

accept a document for filing without a 

certificate of service. 

Parties are also advised to consult 

with the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 

through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 

207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for 

provisions of general applicability 

concerning written submissions to the 

Commission. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 2, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–4145 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent 

Judgment Pursuant to Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

February 28, 2007, a proposed Consent 

Judgment in United States v. AGI–VR 

Wesson Co. et al., Civil Action No. CV–

07–825, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Eastern 

District of New York. 

The proposed Consent Judgment will 

settle the United States’ claims on 

behalf of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) brought 

against defendants AGI–VR/Wesson Co., 

Alloy Carbide Company, Chi Mei 

Corporation, Climax Molybdenum 

Company, Climax Molybdenum 

Marketing Corporation, County of 

Nassau, New York, Cyprus Amax 

Minerals Company, General Electric 

Company, GTE Corporation, H.C. 

Starck, Inc., Kennametal Inc., M&R 

Industries, Inc., Minmetals Inc., Osram 

Sylvania Inc., Philips Electronics North 

America Corporation, Sandvik, AB, TDY 

Holding, LLC; and TDY Industries, Inc., 

(along with Adamas Carbide 

Corporation and Kulite Tungsten Corp.) 

pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607, with respect to the Li Tungsten 

Superfund Site in Glen Cove, New York. 

Pursuant to the Consent Judgment, a 

total of $5.11 million will be paid by 

settling defendants. Of this amount, $1.5 

million will be denominated as a civil 

penalty for failure to comply with an 

administrative order. In addition, TDY 

will perform the remaining work at the 

Site (other than that which EPA has 

reserved to perform itself), which is 

estimated by EPA at $10.7 million. The 

Consent Decree also resolves claims 

against four agencies of the United 

States, the Department of Commerce, 

the Department of Defense, the 

Department of the Treasury, and the 

General Services Administration 

(‘‘Settling Federal Agencies’’). Pursuant 

to the Consent Judgment, the Settling 

Federal Agencies shall pay $25 million 

to EPA and $1 million to TDY, and also 

receive contribution protection. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Consent 

Judgment. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. AGI–VR Wesson Co., et al., 

Civil Action No. CV–07–835, D.J. Ref. 

90–11–3–09093. 

The proposed Consent Judgment may 

be examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney, Eastern District of New 

York, One Pierrepont Plaza, 14th Fl., 

Brooklyn, New York 11201, and at the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region II, 290 Broadway, New 

York, New York 10007–1866. During the 

public comment period, the proposed 

Consent Judgment may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decress.html. A copy of the 

proposed Consent Judgment may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. If requesting a 

copy by mail from the Consent Decree 

Library, please enclose a check in the 

amount of $208.00 ($0.25 per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury or, if requesting by email or fax, forward the check in that 

amount to the Consent Decree Library at 

the stated address. If requesting a copy 

exclusive of exhibits, please enclose a 

check in the amount of $32.25 ($0.25 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
10558 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices 

per page reproduction cost) payable to 

the United States Treasury. 

Ronald Gluck, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–1070 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Pursuant to the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

In accordance with Departmental 

policy, notice is hereby given that a 

proposed consent decree in United 

States v. Franks Petroleum Corp., et al., 

Civil Action No. 2:07–CV–0337, was 

lodged with the United States Court for 

the Western District of Louisiana on 

February 23, 2007. 

In a complaint filed with the consent 

decree, the United States seeks 

reimbursement for costs incurred in 

connection with the Castex oilfield 

waste disposal facility located near 

Jennings, Louisiana (the ‘‘Site’’), from 11 

settling defendants pursuant to section 

107 of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607. These 11 

settling defendants agree to pay 

$2,000,000 to resolve federal claims 

relating to the Site. 

The Department of Justice will 

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication, 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General for the Environmental and 

Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 

7611, Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to United States v. Franks 

Petroleum Corp., et al., DOJ Ref. #90–5–

1–1–08095. 

The proposed consent decree may be 

examined at the office of the United 

States Attorney, Western District of 

Louisiana, 800 Lafayette Street, Suite 

2200, Lafayette, LA 70501, and National 

Pollution Funds Centers, 4200 Wilson 

Blvd, Ste 1000, Arlington, VA 22203–

1804. A copy of the consent decree may 

also be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

consent decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy of the consent decree 

without signature pages and 

appendices, please enclose a check in 

the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury. Comments may be sent to: 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. 

Thomas A. Mariani, Jr., 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–1069 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance; 

Correction 

This notice corrects the Notice of 

Determinations Regarding Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance which was 

published in the Federal Register on 

February 27, 2007 (72 FR 8794–8795). 

This revises the reporting period dates 

on pages 8794–8795 to read February 12 

through February 16, 2007 instead of 

January 12 through January 16, 2007. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of 

March 2007. 

Ralph DiBattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–4058 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–59,136; TA–W–59,136B] 

Cranston Print Works Company, 

Design and Engraving Division, 

Cranston, RI; Cranston Print Works 

Company, Corporate Headquarters, 

Cranston, RI; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification Regarding Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance on April 21, 

2006, applicable to workers of Cranston 

Print Works Company, Design and 

Engraving Division, Cranston, Rhode 

Island. The notice was published in the 

Federal Register on May 10, 2006 (71 

FR 27291). 

At the request of the company, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of artwork designs used by the subject 

firm to engrave rotary screens for 

printing textile fabrics. 

The company reports that worker 

separations occurred at the Corporate 

Headquarters facility of the subject firm 

where the workers provide 

administrative support functions for the 

subject firm’s production plant located 

in Cranston, Rhode Island. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending the 

certification to include workers of the 

Cranston Print Works Company, 

Corporate Headquarters, Cranston, 

Rhode Island. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

Cranston Print Works Company, Design 

and Engraving Division who were 

adversely affected by increased 

company imports. The amended notice 

applicable to TA-W–59,136 is hereby 

issued as follows: 

All workers of Cranston Print Works 

Company, Design and Engraving Division, 

Cranston, Rhode Island (TA–W–59,136) and 

Cranston Print Works Company, Corporate 

Headquarters, Cranston, Rhode Island (TA–

W–59,136B), who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after 

March 6, 2005, through April 21, 2008, are 

eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 

and are also eligible to apply for alternative 

trade adjustment assistance under Section 

246 of the Trade Act of 1974. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of 

February 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–4062 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES