**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST** (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)
SI P Submitted by : Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Date Submitted: January 11, 2013 Subject: Requireme nts of CAA S ections 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in Relation to Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest Completeness Review Completed by : Rose Quinto Date Completed: February 13 , 2013

**Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE** 

**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Letter dated January 11, 2013 from Collin P. O’Mara , Secretary , Delaware Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control to Shawn M. Garvin , EPA Regional Administrator. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. The Secretary ’s O rder has an issuance date of December 4 , 2012 , effective date December 4 , 2012 . The Order was signed by th e Se cretary

on December 4 , 2012

. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority

under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Delaware has legal authority to adopt this regulation under Title 7, Delaware Code, Chapter 60. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 4. A cop y of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by

reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made t o the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated b y the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable b y the State. The effective date of t he regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. Document entitled, “ Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of N ational Ambient Air Quality Standards , Revision to Delaware’s S tate I mplementation P lan to Address C lean A ir A ct §110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and §128 , ” effective December 4 , 2012 . Cover letter dated January 11, 2013 , transmitting the document has an effective date of December 4, 2012

. X

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requiremen ts of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5

. S ec retary ’s Order No. 2012

- A

- 004 3 dated December 4 , 2012

. Cover letter transmittin g the SI P revision dated January 11, 20 1 3 . Copy

of public hearin g notices. Certification of public hearing notice. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved b y EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Affidavit of publications dated Septem ber 19, 2012 from two local newspapers: The News Jo urnal and Independent Newsmedia, In c. , USA. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if ap plicable. 7. Certification dated January 8, 2013 signed b y t he Directo r, Division of Air Quality . Public hearing was held on October 23, 2012

. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. Hearing Officer’s Report dated Nove mber 27, 2012

. X**Technical Materials EPA REQUIREMENT**  **STATE SUBMITTAL (X)** 

1. I dentification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. All criteria pollutants of the nationa l ambient air quality

standards (NAAQS)

. X

2. I dentification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. State of Delawa re. X
3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected so urces through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. N/A. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of CAA §§110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in relation to disclosure of conflicts of interest. X

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility , as applicable, are protected if th e plan is approved and implemented. 4. N/A. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of CAA § §110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in relation to disclosure of conflicts of interest. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, includ ing input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analy sis. 5. N/A. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of CAA § §110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in relation to disclosure of conflicts of interest. X

6. Evidence, where necessary , that emission limitations are based on continuous emission r eduction technology

. 6

. N/A. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of CAA § §110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in relation to disclosure of conflicts of interest. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and record keeping/reporting requirements, where necessary , to ensure emission levels. 7. N/A. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of CAA § §110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in relation to disclosure of conflicts of interest. X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies , including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. N/A. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of CAA § §110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128 in relation to disclosure of conflicts of interest. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required b y an y applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why .) 9. N/A. No special justifications are required. X
10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NA AQS for at least 10 y ears after redesignation. 10. N/A. This SI P revision is not a section 107 request. X