alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATE’S BRIEF Page 1 of 3

Nos. 05-15-01312-CR and 05-15-01313-CR

EX PARTE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 * 

 * 

 * FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF 

 * 

 * 

ROBERT ANTHONY HUNT * TEXAS AT DALLAS 

 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATE’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

 The State of Texas moves the Court to grant it additional time in which to 

file a brief under TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d), 10.1, and 10.5(b) and, in support, shows: 

I.

The Appellant’s Brief was filed on December 7, 2015, after the granting of a 

motion for extension of time. The State’s Brief is due to be filed on December 22, 

2015. It has become necessary for the State to request an extension of the deadline 

from December 22, 2015 until January 21, 2016 (30 days).

II.

The need for an extension may be reasonably explained as follows. During 

the time the undersigned was assigned the task of preparing the State’s Brief, he 

was also assigned to the brief in Gregory Guajardo v. State, Cause No. 05-15-

ACCEPTED

05-15-01313-CR

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

12/15/2015 9:17:14 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/15/2015 9:17:14 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATE’S BRIEF Page 2 of 3

00197-CR, which is due to be filed on December 20, 2015. The undersigned has 

also been assigned to write the brief in Jorge Barroquin-Tabres v. State, No. 05-

15-00794-CR, which is due to be filed on January 7, 2016. 

III.

No previous extensions have been requested by the State.

IV.

This case is set for submission on February 1, 2016.

V.

WHEREFORE, the State prays this motion will be granted and that the State’s 

brief be accepted for filing no later than January 21, 2016.

 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Justin T. Johnson

SUSAN HAWK JUSTIN T. JOHNSON

Criminal District Attorney Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Dallas County, Texas SBN 24054522

Frank Crowley Courts Building

133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-19

Dallas, Texas 75207

(214) 653-3604

(214) 653-3643 fax

justin.johnson@dallascounty.org
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STATE’S BRIEF Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing motion has been served on Gary 

Udashen, Attorney for Appellant Robert Anthony Hunt, by electronic service 

through eFileTexas.gov on December 15, 2015.

/s/ Justin T. Johnson

Justin T. Johnson
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cleantech Transit, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  February
      8, 2011By:
              /s/ Roger NelsenName:  Roger
      NelsenTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) & Interim Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)
§ 660.11 What are the Director's obligations in interstate situations? ( a ) The Director is responsible for: ( 1 ) Identifying proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development that have an impact on interstate areas;
( 2 ) Notifying appropriate officials and entities in states which have adopted a process and which select the Foundation's program or activity.
( 3 ) Making efforts to identify and notify the affected state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities in those states that have not adopted a process under the Order or do not select the Foundation's program or activity;
( 4 ) Responding pursuant to § 660.10 of this part if the Director receives a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Foundation have been delegated.
( b ) The Director uses the procedures in § 660.10 if a state process provides a state process recommendation to the Foundation through a single point of contact.
§ 2516.830 What types of activities are required of Corporation grantees to evaluate the effectiveness of their subgrantees? A Corporation grantee that makes subgrants must do the following: (a) Ensure that subgrantees comply with the requirements of § 2516.840. ( b ) Track program performance in terms of progress toward pre-established objectives; ensure that corrective action is taken when necessary; and submit to the Corporation periodic performance reports.
( c ) Collect from programs and submit to the Corporation the descriptive information required in § 2516.820(c)(1).
( d ) Cooperate fully with all Corporation evaluation activities.
# CE2010045EN.01011302.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/113 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/113

---

Transfers of defence-related products ***I

P6_TA(2008)0603

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community (COM(2007)0765 — C6-0468/2007 — 2007/0279(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/37)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0765), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0765),

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0468/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0468/2007),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0410/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0410/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.   Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2007)0279

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 16 December 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/43/EC.)

---
#### § 261.16 Does the imposition of a penalty affect an individual's work requirement?

A penalty imposed by a State against the family of an individual by reason of the failure of the individual to comply with a requirement under TANF shall not be construed to be a reduction in any wage paid to the individual.
§ 309.135 What requirements apply to funding, obligating and liquidating Federal title IV-D grant funds? ( a ) *Funding period* — ( 1 ) *Ongoing funding.* Federal title IV-D grant funds will be awarded to Tribes and Tribal organizations for use during a 12-month period equivalent to the Federal fiscal year of October 1 through September 30.
( 2 ) *Initial grant.* A Tribe or Tribal organization may request that its initial IV-D grant be awarded for a funding period of less than one year (but at least six months) or more than one year (but not to exceed 17 months) to enable its program funding cycle to coincide with the funding period specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Obligation period.* A Tribe or Tribal organization must obligate its Federal title IV-D grant funds no later than the last day of the funding period for which they were awarded. Any of these funds remaining unobligated after that date must be returned to the Department.
( c ) *Liquidation period.* A Tribe or Tribal organization must liquidate the Federal title IV-D grant funds obligated during the obligation period specified in paragraph (b) of this section no later than the last day of the 12-month period immediately following the obligation period. Any of these funds remaining unliquidated after that date must be returned to the Department.
( d ) *Funding reductions.* As required under § 309.130(b)(3), a Tribe or Tribal organization will report quarterly on Form SF 269A the amount of Federal title IV-D grant funds that have been obligated and liquidated and the amounts that remain unobligated and unliquidated at the end of each fiscal quarter during the obligation and liquidation periods. The Department will reduce the amount of the Tribe or Tribal organization's Federal title IV-D grant funds for the funding period by any amount reported as remaining unobligated on the report following the last day of the obligation period. The Department will further reduce the amount of the Tribe or Tribal organization's Federal title IV-D grant funds for the funding period by any amount reported as remaining unliquidated on the report following the last day of the liquidation period.
( e ) *Extension requests.* A Tribe or Tribal organization may submit a written request for an extension of the deadline for liquidating Federal title IV-D grant funds. Such a request must be sent to ACF, to the attention of the Federal grants officer named on the most recent grant award. The request must be submitted as soon as it is clear that such an extension will be needed; any request received after the end of the liquidation period will not be considered. The request must include a detailed explanation of the extenuating circumstances or other reasons for the request and must state the date by which the Tribe anticipates all obligated funds will be liquidated. Unless the Tribe receives a written approval of its request, the deadline stated in paragraph (c) of this section remains in effect.
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

233) IV-E-108 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM Sheet 233 of 242 
P.2 

A-ffl-tt 

v

4 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

vssy 

JUL 28 1993 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Telephone Conference with Representatives of 

American Petroleum Institute (API) 

FROM: Steven Silverman, Attorney ^£$lS€s>0 ^k^iMA)mrCrl^/C^ 

Office of General Counsel 

TO: Onboard Docket (A 87-11) 

On July 15th, I had a telephone conversation with Alice Crowe 

and Jeff Trask of API regarding certain issues likely to be raised 

in the reopened rulemaking requiring Onboard Vapor Recovery. They 

are concerned that promulgating an Onboard requirement for other 

than light duty vehicles (LDVs) could delay ultimate LDV 

promulgation. I said that I didn't think this was the case, 

particularly given our settlement agreement. They also wondered if 

LDV and non-LDV requirements, if adopted, could be included in 

separate regulatory provisions. I said this was simply a matter of 

taste without substantive effect, and that the hypothetical 

requirements were easily severable in any case.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND 

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 11-951 (CKK)

ORDER

(September 5, 2014) 

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is, this 5th day of 

September, 2014, hereby 

ORDERED that Defendant’s [36] Objections to Magistrate Judge Facciola’s Report and 

Recommendation are OVERRULED. Magistrate Judge Facciola’s February 12, 2014 Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. [35], is ADOPTED as modified in the accompanying 

Memorandum Opinion; and it is further 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s [24] Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. The Federal 

Election Commission shall pay Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington reasonable 

attorney fees in the amount of $153,258.98 and costs in the amount of $500.00; and it is 

SO ORDERED. 

This is a final, appealable order. 

 /s/

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 43 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 1
#### § 606.40 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the Foundation. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
EX-35 (a)
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.

GSR MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-OA1

     I, David M. Friedman, a duly authorized officer of American Home Mortgage
Servicing, Inc., as servicer (the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Mortgage Loan
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2005, by and among Goldman
Sachs Mortgage Company, the Servicer and American Home Mortgage Corp. (the
"Agreement"), hereby certify that:

     1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and
including January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (the
"Reporting Period") and of the Servicer's performance under the Agreement and
any applicable Reconstitution Agreement (as such term is defined in the
Agreement) has been made under my supervision.

     2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and any applicable
Reconstitution Agreement (as such term is defined in the Agreement) in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period,

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
12th day of March, 2007.

By: /s/ David M. Friedman
Name:  David M. Friedman
Title: Executive Vice President
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


FLEX
FUELS ENERGY, INC.


FORM
10-KSB/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Paul
Gothard, am the Chief Financial Officer of Flex Fuels Energy, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the amendeded Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Annual
Report").




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 26, 2008By:
      /s/ Paul
      Gothard
              
              Paul
      Gothard
              Chief
      Financial Officer (acting Principal Accounting Officer) and
      Director
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A)
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I,



I, Tsippy Moldovan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on 10-QSB of Defense Industries
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/S/ Tsippy Moldovan
-------------------
Tsippy Moldovan
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1119]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Notice of 
Public Input Opportunity

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

SUMMARY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH) announces the following availability of opportunity for the 
public to provide input regarding the draft document, ``Explosion 
Pressure Design Criteria for New Seals in U.S. Mines.''
    NIOSH is the Federal agency responsible for conducting research and 
making recommendations for the prevention of occupational injuries and 
illnesses, including those occurring in the mining industry. Federal 
Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 951.
    Seals are dam-like structures constructed in underground coal mines 
throughout the U.S. to isolate abandoned mining panels or groups of 
panels from the active workings. Historically, mining regulations 
required seals to withstand a 140 kPa (20 psi) explosion pressure; 
however, the 2006 MINER Act requires MSHA to increase this design 
standard by the end of 2007. This report provides a sound scientific 
and engineering justification to recommend a three-tiered explosion 
pressure design criteria for new seals in coal mines in response to the 
MINER Act. Much of the information contained in this report also 
applies to existing seals.
    A copy of the draft document can be found at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/public/mineseal/.
    Comments should be submitted to the NIOSH Docket Office, Robert A. 
Taft Laboratories, 4676 Columbia Parkway, M/S C-34, Cincinnati, OH 
45226, telephone 513/533-8450, fax 513/533-8285, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#036d6a6c706b676c60686677436067602d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aac4c3c5d9c2cec5c9c1cfdeeac9cec984cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Comments may also be submitted directly through the Web site http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/public/mineseal/comments.html.
    The document will remain available for comment until March 12, 
2007. Comments should reference docket number NIOSH-100 in the subject 
heading.
    All information received in response to this notice will be 
available for public examination and copying at the NIOSH Docket 
Office, Room 111, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffery Kohler, PhD, NIOSH Associate 
Director for Mining and Construction, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, 
Pittsburgh, PA 15236, 412-386-6544.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 07-1119 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant and Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against David E. Austen, as Receiver of Taxes for the City of New York, Respondent and Appellant.

*Mattel• of Manhattan liy. Go.*v. *Austen,*133 App. Div. 890, affirmed.

(Argued January 5, 1910;

decided January 25, 1910.)

Cross-appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 11, 1909, Avliich affirmed an order of Special Term granting in part and denying in part a motion for a peremptory Avrit of mandamus to compel the defendant to credit *582the petitioner with certain payments on account of franchise taxes.

*Julien T. Davies*and *Brainard Tolles*for petitioner, appellant and respondent.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Curtis A. Peters*of counsel), for defendant, respondent and appellant.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chase, JJ. Absent: Edward T. Bartlett, J.