alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harteau v. Deer Park Blue-Stone Company.

*Contempt—recital of conviction in order—reference as to damages.*

Where an order, made at a special term, recites a determination by the court that a person named is guilty of a contempt in violating an injunction, the objection cannot be raised, on appeal, that it does not appear that he was convicted of the contempt. *Sugg*v. Spencer, 59 Barb. 388.

The ascertainment of the amount of damage sustained by a plaintiff by the violation of an injunction, by an individual, is a part of the proceeding to punish a party for a contempt of that character. And where an order of reference directed that such a proceeding be referred to a referee to take testimony in regard to the same, and report his opinion thereon; *held,*that the amount of damages which the plaintiff had sustained was a proper subject of testimony under such order.

Where the testimony before the referee tended to show that the party proceeded against had collected, as the agent of the defendant, contrary to the prohibition of the injunction, $671.47 of the assets of the defendant, and appropriated the same to his own use; *held,*that *prima facie,*the plaintiff was damnified to that extent by the transaction, provided his claim against the defendant was equal to that amount.

Appeal by Adolphus E. Godeffroy, an agent and officer of the defendant, from an order of the special term convicting him of contempt in violating an injunction issued in this action, and imposing a fine therefor.

*Kobbe & Fowler,*for appellant.

*Lewis Beach,*for plaintiff.

Talcott, J.

The material points passed upon in the opinion appear in the head-note, and it is not believed necessary to publish the opinion in full.

*Order affirmed.*
**
**Exhibit 13.2**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vedanta Limited (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 
(i)
the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended March 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: July 15, 2019 

By:
 
/s/ GR Arun Kumar

Name: GR Arun Kumar 

Title: WholeTime Director & Chief Financial Officer 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
§ 411.13 UC supervision and monitoring. ( a ) Care provider facilities must develop, document, and make their best effort to comply with a staffing plan that provides for adequate levels of staffing, and, where applicable under State and local licensing standards, video monitoring, to protect UCs from sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
( b ) In determining adequate levels of UC supervision and determining the need for video monitoring, the care provider facility must take into consideration the physical layout of the facility, the composition of the UC population, the prevalence of substantiated and unsubstantiated incidents of sexual abuse and sexual harassment, and any other relevant factors. Video monitoring equipment may not be placed in any bathroom, shower or bathing area, or other area where UCs routinely undress.
( c ) Care provider facilities must conduct frequent unannounced rounds to identify and deter sexual abuse and sexual harassment. Such rounds must be implemented during night as well as day shifts. Care provider facilities must prohibit staff from alerting others that rounds are occurring, unless such announcement is related to the legitimate operational functions of the care provider facility.
§ 607.3 Applicability. The regulations in this part are to be followed when: ( a ) NSF is owed a debt by an individual who is a current employee of the NSF; or
( b ) NSF is owed a debt by an individual currently employed by another Federal agency; or
( c ) NSF employs an individual who owes a debt to another Federal agency.
§ 73a.735-104 Advice and guidance. ( a ) The Associate Commissioner for Administration (or his designee) shall provide day-to-day guidance and assistance to employees and supervisors on matters covered by regulations in part 73 and this part of this chapter.
( b ) The FDA Conflict of Interest Review Board shall review and make recommendations to the Commissioner on requests for exceptions to conflict of interest policies and procedures in regulations in this part and part 73 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Remi Barbier, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and Peter S. Roddy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2006/s/ REMI BARBIERRemi Barbier,Chairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ PETER S. RODDYPeter S. Roddy,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

REAR ADMIRAL JAMES CAREY

(Ret.), et al.,

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 11-259 (RMC)

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendants. )

)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed simultaneously with this

Order, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs [Dkt. # 29] is

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that costs are awarded to Plaintiffs in the amount of

$350; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ may recover attorneys’ fees at the rate of

$181.37 per hour; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that no later than June 4, 2012, Plaintiffs shall file a

revised affidavit of attorneys’ fees, together with a proposed order awarding fees, in accordance

with this Opinion.

DATE: May 22, 2012 /s/ 

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00259-RMC Document 35 Filed 05/22/12 Page 1 of 1
§ 164.318 Compliance dates for the initial implementation of the security standards. ( a ) *Health plan.* ( 1 ) A health plan that is not a small health plan must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than April 20, 2005.
( 2 ) A small health plan must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than April 20, 2006.
( b ) *Health care clearinghouse.* A health care clearinghouse must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than April 20, 2005.
( c ) *Health care provider.* A covered health care provider must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than April 20, 2005.
§ 411.15 Accommodating UCs with disabilities and UCs who are limited English proficient (LEP). ( a ) Care provider facilities must take appropriate steps to ensure that UCs with disabilities (including, for example, UCs who are deaf or hard of hearing, those who are blind or have low vision, or those who have intellectual, psychiatric, or speech disabilities) have an equal opportunity to participate in or benefit from all aspects of the care provider facility's efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to sexual abuse and sexual harassment. Such steps must include, when necessary to ensure effective communication with UCs who are deaf or hard of hearing, providing access to in-person, telephonic, or video interpretive services that enable effective, accurate, and impartial interpretation, both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary. In addition, the care provider facility must ensure that any written materials related to sexual abuse and sexual harassment are translated and provided in formats or through methods that ensure effective communication with UCs with disabilities, including UCs who have intellectual disabilities, limited reading skills, or who are blind or have low vision.
( b ) Care provider facilities must take appropriate steps to ensure that UCs who are limited English proficient have an equal opportunity to participate in or benefit from all aspects of the care provider facility's efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to sexual abuse and sexual harassment, including steps to provide quality in-person or telephonic interpretive services and quality translation services that enable effective, accurate, and impartial interpretation and translation, both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary.
( c ) In matters relating to allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment, the care provider facility must provide quality in-person or telephonic interpretation services that enable effective, accurate, and impartial interpretation by someone other than another UC. Care provider facilities also must ensure that any written materials related to sexual abuse and sexual harassment, including notification, orientation, and instruction not provided by ORR, are translated either verbally or in written form into the preferred languages of UCs.
```

[Federal Register: February 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 38)]
[Notices]               
[Page 9016-9017]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26fe10-145]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Fifth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary 
Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 221 meeting: Aircraft 
Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary Barriers and 
Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16-17, 2010. March 16th from 12 
a.m. to 5 p.m., March 17th from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary 
Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures meeting. The 
agenda will include:
     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Approval of Summary of the Fourth Meeting held September 
15th-16th, 2009, RTCA Paper No. 012-10/SC221-015.
     Leadership Comments.
     Review of Threat Work Group--Status Report.
     Review of Alternative Methods Work Group--Status Report.
     Review of Installed Physical Secondary Barrier (IPSB) Work 
Group--Status Report.
     Presentation/Discussion of SC-221 tentative conclusions, 
discussion of framework and content for final report.
     Discussion of Working Group reports: Re-allocation of 
groups, capture learning points, discuss additional or follow-on goals.
     Approval and Tasking of Existing/Proposed Working Groups.
     Other Business--Including Proposed Agenda, Date and Place 
for Next Meeting.

[[Page 9017]]

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 22, 2010.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-4027 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### § 213.11 Notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing.

Proceedings are commenced by mailing a notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing from the Administrator to the State. The notice shall state the time and place for the hearing, and the issues which will be considered, and shall be published in the Federal Register.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Aaron Michael Marshall, Appellant

No. 06-23-00162-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2022F00024). 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and 

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Stevens. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Aaron Michael Marshall, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 12, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
August 25, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.S. AND A.R.S., CHILDREN

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on May 23, 2016. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant Sara Elizabeth Slaughter.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 17 , 2020

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 20

- 00624

- CR NO. 14

- 20

- 00625

- CR

IN RE TERRENCE JOHNSON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 338th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1657698 & 1650245



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 11, 2020 , relator Terrence Johnson filed a petition for writ of habeas c orpus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator claims that his bail is excessive and asks this court to reduce his bail. The courts of appeal have no original habeas

- corpus jurisdiction in criminal
matters. In re Ayers , 515 S.W.3d 956, 956 (Tex. A pp.―Houston [14 th Dist.] 2016,2

orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d)). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Id. (citing Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 11.05). Therefore, this court does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction over a request to reduce bail in a criminal

case. See Ortiz v. State , 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.― Amarillo 2009, orig. proceeding) (holding court of appeals did not have jurisdiction in original proceeding to consider challenge to denial of bail and dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus). Accordingly, relator’s petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
combustionsurvey - Fw: Docket ID EPA-HQ-2006-0790 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:33PM -----

To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Toni 

Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Stewart, Andrew M - DNR" <Andrew.Stewart@Wisconsin.gov> 

Date: 07/15/2011 05:42PM 

Cc: "Stevens, Patrick K - DNR" <Patrick.Stevens@wisconsin.gov>, "Baumann, William B - DNR" 

<William.Baumann@Wisconsin.gov> 

Subject: Docket ID EPA-HQ-2006-0790 

(See attached file: Boiler_mact.PDF)

Attached please find additional information concerning the reconsideration of National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process 

Heaters from Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions 

or would like to discuss the attached letter. 

 

 

 

 Andrew M. Stewart

Chief, Permits & Stationary Source Modeling

Bureau of Air Management

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

() phone: (608) 266-6876

() fax: fax: (608) 267-0560

() e-mail: mail: andrew.stewart@wisconsin.gov

 

= 

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:34 PM

Subject: Fw: Docket ID EPA-HQ-2006-0790

Attachments: Boiler_mact.PDF

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AF8BDO... 8/2/2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC,
the Managing Owner of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                             |  | 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 25, 2008 |  | /s/ Kevin Rich              |  | 
|                     |  | Kevin Rich                  |  | 
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and |  | 
|                     |  | Principal Financial Officer |  |
§ 411.114 Audit corrective action plan. ( a ) A finding of “Does Not Meet Standard” with one or more standards must trigger a 90-day corrective action period.
( b ) The auditor and ORR must jointly develop a corrective action plan to achieve compliance.
( c ) The auditor must take necessary and appropriate steps to verify implementation of the corrective action plan, such as reviewing updated policies and procedures or re-inspecting portions of a care provider facility.
( d ) After the 180-day corrective action period ends, the auditor must issue a final determination as to whether the care provider facility achieved compliance with those standards requiring corrective action.
( e ) If the care provider facility does not achieve compliance with each standard, it may (at its discretion and cost) request a subsequent audit once it believes that it achieved compliance.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31310

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BERNARDO GARCIA, also known as John Doe, also known as Rafael

Nina Encarnacisa,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CR-46-T-3)

Consolidated with

No. 95-31324

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BERNARDO GARCIA, a/k/a Beto,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2

for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CR-250-T)

May 16, 1997

Before JOHNSON, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bernardo Garcia appeals his guilty-plea conviction for using

and carrying a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The

record does not establish a factual basis for Garcia’s plea to

either the use or carrying of a firearm within the meaning of the

statute. See United States v. Hall, __ F.3d __ (5th Cir. Apr. 14,

1997) (No. 95-60551), 1997 WL 180388. Accordingly, we VACATE the

conviction and REMAND the case for further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
§ 2506.2 Under what authority does the Corporation issue these regulations? ( a ) The Corporation is issuing the regulations in this part under the authority of 31 U.S.C. chapter 37, 3701-3720A and 3720D. These sections implement the requirements of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996.
( b ) The Corporation is also issuing the regulations in this part to conform to the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), which prescribe standards for handling the Federal Government's claims for money or property. The FCCS are issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Treasury at 31 CFR chapter IX, parts 900-904. The Corporation adopts those standards without change. The regulations in this part supplement the FCCS by prescribing procedures necessary and appropriate for the Corporation's operations.
( c ) The Corporation is also issuing the regulations in this part to conform to the standards for handling Administrative Wage Garnishment processing by the Federal Government. The standards are issued by the Treasury at 31 CFR 285.11. The Corporation adopts those standards without change. The regulations in this part supplement the standards by prescribing procedures necessary and appropriate for the Corporation's operations.
( d ) The Corporation is further issuing the regulations in this part under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 5514, and the salary offset regulations published by the Office of Personnel and Management at 5 CFR part 550, subpart K.
( e ) All of these debt collection regulations are issued under the Corporation's authority under 42 U.S.C. 12651c(c).