**GAO-11-830**                      Published: Sep 15, 2011. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 2011.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

	Long-standing weaknesses in Department of Defense (DOD) business processes, systems, and controls have hindered efforts to achieve financial audit readiness. Because DOD relies heavily on budget information for day-to-day management decisions, in August 2009, the DOD Comptroller designated the Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) as an audit priority. The U.S. Marine Corps was identified as the pilot military service for an SBR audit. GAO was asked to determine (1) the primary reasons the Marine Corps was unable to obtain an opinion on its fiscal year 2010 SBR; (2) the effectiveness and status of the Marine Corps' remediation plan, and (3) military service efforts to leverage Marine Corps SBR audit lessons. GAO reviewed auditor findings and recommendations, evaluated the Marine Corps corrective action plans, and reviewed documentation on military service audit readiness and lessons learned efforts. During its work, GAO met with DOD, Marine Corps, military service, and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) officials and the auditors..

	The Marine Corps received a disclaimer of opinion on its Fiscal Year 2010 SBR because it could not provide supporting documentation in a timely manner, and support for transactions was missing or incomplete. Auditors also reported that the Marine Corps did not have adequate processes, systems controls, and controls for accounting and reporting on the use of budgetary resources. Further, the Marine Corps could not provide evidence that reconciliations for key accounts and processes were being performed on a monthly basis. The auditor also identified ineffective controls in key information technology (IT) systems used by the Marine Corps to process financial data. The auditors provided 139 recommendations to correct identified weaknesses. The Marine Corps developed action items and milestones in response to the auditor's findings. But its remediation plan was focused on near-term outcomes and did not adequately specify key elements, including goals and objectives, actions for addressing those objectives, and associated performance measures. GAO previously reported that it is standard practice to have strategy that includes these features. GAO found that many of the Marine Corps' actions did not address the specific auditor recommendations, and other actions were not adequate to correct underlying problems or root causes. Further, many of the remediation actions would require steps on the part of other DOD components, such as DFAS and the Defense Contract Management Agency. As of July 2011, the Marine Corps reported that actions on 88 of the 139 auditor recommendations were fully implemented. Auditors will assess the effectiveness of these actions as part of the fiscal year 2011 SBR audit effort. However, because many of the actions do not address the underlying internal control weaknesses, the Marine Corps risks continuing disclaimers of opinion. The Marine Corps' fiscal year 2010 SBR audit results provide valuable lessons on preparing for a first-time financial statement audit. GAO identified five fundamental lessons that are critical to success. Specifically, the Marine Corps' experience demonstrated that prior to asserting financial statement audit readiness, DOD components must (1) confirm completeness of populations of transactions and address any abnormal transactions and balances, (2) test beginning balances, (3) perform key reconciliations, (4) provide timely and complete response to audit documentation requests, and (5) verify that key IT systems are compliant and auditable. These issues are addressed in Internal Control Standards and audit requirements as well as DOD's Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Guidance, which the military services are to follow in developing their respective Financial Improvement Plans (FIP). Navy, Army, and Air Force FIP officials stated that they were aware of the Marine Corps lessons. Navy officials stated that they are in the process of updating their audit readiness plan to address all five areas. Army and Air Force officials indicated their plans addressed some but not all of the lessons. GAO makes recommendations to (1) the Marine Corps to develop a riskbased remediation plan and confirm its actions fully respond to auditor recommendations and (2) DOD to direct other military services to consider key lessons learned in their audit readiness plans, as appropriate. DOD concurred with three of four recommendations but said the recommendation for a risk-based plan was too prescriptive. GAO believes this is needed for the long term.

## Reissued on October 17, 2011

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (77 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Government Operations

AccountabilityAccountingAccounting proceduresBudget obligationsBudget outlaysDefense auditsDefense economic analysisDocumentationFinancial managementFinancial statementsInternal auditsInternal controlsLessons learnedMilitary forcesPerformance measuresRisk managementCorrective action