alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2009066EN.01008701.xml

| 20.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 66/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 66/87

---

Marketing of vegetable propagating and planting material, other than seed *

P6_TA(2008)0079

P6_TA(2008)0079

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2008 on the proposal for a Council directive on the marketing of vegetable propagating and planting material, other than seed (codified version) (COM(2007)0852 — C6-0038/2008 — 2007/0296(CNS))

(2009/C 66 E/23)

(Consultation procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2007)0852), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2007)0852),

| — | having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0038/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0038/2008),

| — | having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

| — | having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0056/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0056/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1588 

To ensure that an employer has the freedom to implement English in the 

workplace policies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2009 

Mr. PRICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mr. BARTLETT, Mrs. BIGGERT, 

Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HERGER, 

Mr. JONES, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. 

MILLER of Florida, Mr. PAUL, Mr. PETRI, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. 

REHBERG, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SMITH

of Nebraska, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, and Mr. WOLF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To ensure that an employer has the freedom to implement 

English in the workplace policies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Common Sense 

5 English Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1588 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds that— 

3 (1) throughout the history of the United States, 

4 English has been the common thread to unify the 

5 American people much as they are united under one 

6 flag; 

7 (2) Americans overwhelmingly believe that it is 

8 very important for people living in the United States 

9 to speak and understand English; 

10 (3) there is vast support among the American 

11 people to allow a company the freedom to implement 

12 English in the workplace policies; and 

13 (4) when a group of employees speaks a lan14 guage other than English in the workplace, it may 

15 cause misunderstandings, create dangerous cir16 cumstances, and undermine morale. 

17 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE PERMIS18 SIBLE. 

19 Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 

20 U.S.C. 2000e–2) is amended by adding at the end the fol21 lowing: 

22 ‘‘(o) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, 

23 it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an 

24 employer to require employees to speak English while en25 gaged in work.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Varsity Group Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                               
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Griffin           
|                       |  | John P. Griffin               
|                       |  | Chief Accounting Officer      
|                       |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# Times and Dates:

10:30 a.m., Tuesday, February 7, 2006; 8:30 a.m. and 10 a.m., Wednesday, February 8, 2006.

# Place:

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# Status:

February 7—10:30 a.m. (Closed); February 8—8:30 a.m. (Open); February 8—10 a.m. (Closed).

# Matters To Be Considered:

## Tuesday, February 7 at 10:30 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Planning.

2. Financial Update.

3. Rate Case Planning.

4. Labor Negotiations Planning.

5. Negotiated Service Agreement.

6. Capital Investment—Remote Encoding System.

7. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

## Wednesday, February 8 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, January 10, 2006.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO Jack Potter.

3. Appointment of Members to Board Committees and Committee Reports.

4. Capital Investment—Flats Sequencing System and Delivery Point Packager Research & Development Modification.

5. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.

6. Tentative Agenda for the March 28, 2006, meeting in Washington, DC.

## Wednesday, February 8 at 10 a.m. (Closed) (If Needed)

1. Continuation of Tuesday's closed session agenda.

# Contact Person for More Information:

William T. Johnstone, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

William T. Johnstone,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-995 Filed 1-30-06; 3:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 897 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 897

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make a permanent increase in 
the number of judges presiding over the United States Court of Appeals 
              for Veterans Claims, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2023

 Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make a permanent increase in 
the number of judges presiding over the United States Court of Appeals 
              for Veterans Claims, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expedite Veteran Appeals Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT INCREASE IN NUMBER OF JUDGES PRESIDING OVER COURT OF 
              APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS.

    Section 7253(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``seven'' and inserting ``nine''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Opening of East One Hundred and Seventy-ninth Street in the Borough of the Bronx, New York City. William G. Mulligan, Appellant; Raymond C. Haff, Respondent.

*Matter of Bast One Hundred & Seventy-ninth*Street, 131 App. Div. 933, affirmed,

(Argued October 7, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 19, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirm*529ing the report of a referee in a proceeding to determine the validity of an attorney’s lien.

*Meyer Levy*and *William G. Mulligan*for appellant.

*William A. Young*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, CIi. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

A13-05 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Ted Cruz for Senate 

(TCFS) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on May 24,2017, the Commission decided 

by a vote of S-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on Ted Cruz for Senate (TCFS), as recommended in the Memorandxim from the 

Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated April 25,2017. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

rrii^ 2.4, 

u Date Dayna C. Brown 

Secretary and Clierk of the Commission
SCPW-19-0000847

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ERIC RICHARD ELESON, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Eric Richard Eleson’s

petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on December 10, 2019,

the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof,

and the record, it appears that petitioner presents no special

reason for this court to invoke its jurisdiction at this time. 

See Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976)

(the supreme court “will not exercise its original jurisdiction

in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower

court and no special reason exists for invoking its

jurisdiction”). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus is denied.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-19-0000847

17-DEC-2019

02:47 PM
IT IS HEREBY ALSO ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas

corpus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court is directed to file a copy of petitioner’s

“Verified Petition for a Writ in the Nature of Habeas Corpus,”

filed on December 10, 2019 (Dkt. No. 1), as an application for

writ of certiorari of the ICA’s judgment on appeal, filed on

December 6, 2019, in CAAP-18-0000747. A filed-marked copy of

the document filed as an application for writ of certiorari shall

be provided to petitioner.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 17, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
United States District Court

District of Columbia

Republican National Committee et al.,

Plaintiffs

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Defendant

Civil Case No. 14-cv-853 (CRC) 

THREE-JUDGE COURT REQUESTED

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment on all three counts of their Verified Complaint (Doc.

1). Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment explains why summary judgment

should be granted in plaintiffs’ favor and Plaintiffs’ Statement of Material Facts provides the

facts as to which there is genuine dispute. Oral argument is requested.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James Bopp, Jr.

James Bopp, Jr., DC Bar #CO 0041

jboppjr@aol.com

Richard E. Coleson*

rcoleson@bopplaw.com

Randy Elf*

relf@bopplaw.com

THE BOPP LAW FIRM, PC

1 South Sixth Street

Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510

812/232-2434 telephone

812/235-3685 facsimile

Counsel for Plaintiffs

*Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Summary-Judgment Motion

Case 1:14-cv-00853-CRC Document 25 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I certify that today I electronically filed the foregoing with the clerk of court using the

CM/ECF system, which will notify:

Kevin Deeley KDeeley@fec.gov 

JSadio@fec.gov

RFreeman@fec.gov

VGraham@fec.gov 

Harry Summers HSummers@fec.gov, 

JSadio@fec.gov

KDeeley@fec.gov 

RFreeman@fec.gov

VGraham@fec.gov 

Erin Chlopak EChlopak@fec.gov

DKolker@fec.gov 

JSadio@fec.gov

KDeeley@fec.gov 

VGraham@fec.gov 

Greg Mueller GMueller@fec.gov, 

 EChlopak@fec.gov

JSadio@fec.gov

KDeeley@fec.gov 

VGraham@fec.gov 

Seth Nesin SNesin@fec.gov

JSadio@fec.gov

KDeeley@fec.gov 

RFreeman@fec.gov

VGraham@fec.gov 

Charles Kitcher CKitcher@fec.gov

July 14, 2014 /s/ James Bopp, Jr.

James Bopp, Jr., DC Bar #CO 0041

Case 1:14-cv-00853-CRC Document 25 Filed 07/14/14 Page 2 of 2
§ 307.40 Suspension of approval of advance planning documents for computerized support enforcement systems. ( a ) *Suspension of approval.* The Office will suspend approval of the APD for a computerized support enforcement system approved and developed under § 307.10, or § 307.11 as of the date that the system ceases to comply substantially with the criteria, requirements, and other provisions in the APD, including conditions in § 307.15(b) and the requirements in § 307.10 or § 307.11 of this part covered under a waiver granted in accordance with § 307.5. Federal funding will be disallowed as described in § 307.30(d) and § 307.31(d).
( b ) *Duration of suspension.* The suspension of approval of an APD under paragraph (a) shall remain in effect until the Office determines that actions required for Federal funding in the future, as specified in the notice of suspension, have been taken and the Office so notifies the State.
[49 FR 33260, Aug. 22, 1984, as amended at 57 FR 47005, Oct. 14, 1992; 63 FR 44405, Aug. 19, 1998; 63 FR 44817, Aug. 21, 1998]
#### § 5.41 How does a submitter identify records containing confidential commercial information?

A person who submits records to the government may designate part or all of the information in such records that they may consider to be exempt from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA. The person may make this designation either at the time the records are submitted to the government or within a reasonable time thereafter. The designation must be in writing. Any such designation will expire 10 years after the records were submitted to the government.
RECEIVED 

2010 DEC-7 PH 2'W 

FEC MAIL CENTER 

Midiad H. Toner 

Direct: (202) 508-6175 

Fax: (2O20 220-7475 

December 7,2010 

BY HAND DELIVERY AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL 

Joseph F. Stoltz 

Assistant Staff Diiectoi, Audit Division 

Federal Elecdon Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: Draft Final Audit Report on the Republican Part}' of Minnesota 

Dear Mr. Stoltz: 

The Republican Party of Minnesota C*RPM") is in receipt of your November 19, 

2010 letter enclosing the draft final audit report on the audit of RPM for the 2007-

2008 elecdon cyde. 

RPM does not believe that a hearing before the Commission conceming this matter is 

necessar}'; accordingly, RPM waives its right to a hearing in this matter. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 

at (202) 508-6175. 

Sincerely, 

Michael E. Toner 

Bryan Gave LLP 

1155 F Street N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Tel (202) 508-6000 

Fax (202) 508-6200 

www.brYancave.eom 

Bryan Cave Offices 

Atlanta 

Charlotte 

Chicago 

Dallas 

Hamburg 

Hong Kong 

Irvine 

Jefferson City 

Kansas City 

London 

Los Angeles 

Milan 

New York 

Paris 

Phoenix 

San Francisco 

Shanghai 

St. Louis 

Washington, DC 

Bryan Cava International Trade 

A TRAoe coMsutrma SUBSUHART 

OF HON-UWm PROFtSSIOimS 

www.bryaneBvetrade.com 

Bangkok 

Beijing 

Jakarta 

Kuala Lumpur 

Manlle 

Shenghai 

Singapore 

Tokyo 

Bryen Cave Stratagiea 

A SOVERmHENT ReiATIONS ANO 

POIITICAI AFFAIRS SUBSIDIARY 

www.brvancavestrategie8.com 

Washington, DC 

St. Louis
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.401 To what do these regulations apply? ( a ) This subpart applies to all research involving children as subjects, conducted or supported by the Department of Health and Human Services. ( 1 ) This includes research conducted by Department employees, except that each head of an Operating Division of the Department may adopt such nonsubstantive, procedural modifications as may be appropriate from an administrative standpoint.
( 2 ) It also includes research conducted or supported by the Department of Health and Human Services outside the United States, but in appropriate circumstances, the Secretary may, under paragraph (e) of § 46.101 of subpart A, waive the applicability of some or all of the requirements of these regulations for research of this type.
( b ) Exemptions at § 46.101(b)(1) and (b)(3) through (b)(6) are applicable to this subpart. The exemption at § 46.101(b)(2) regarding educational tests is also applicable to this subpart. However, the exemption at § 46.101(b)(2) for research involving survey or interview procedures or observations of public behavior does not apply to research covered by this subpart, except for research involving observation of public behavior when the investigator(s) do not participate in the activities being observed.
( c ) The exceptions, additions, and provisions for waiver as they appear in paragraphs (c) through (i) of § 46.101 of subpart A are applicable to this subpart.
[48 FR 9818, Mar. 8, 1983; 56 FR 28032, June 18, 1991; 56 FR 29757, June 28, 1991]
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |   |                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                                                    |   |                     |   |
| DATE:  March 31, 2011     | By:    | /s/ Marius Silvasan |   |
|                                                    |   | Marius Silvasan          |   |
|                                                    |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                                                    |   |                     |   |
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Wi\SHINGTON 0 C 20403

MLr00090S

January 2, 1992

MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

FRED EILAND

CHIEF, PRESS OFFICE

ASSISTANT

ROBERT J. COSTA

STAFF DI:E~O~ ~­

AUDIT DIVISION

PUBLIC ISSUANCE OF THE FINAL AUDIT REPORT ON

MURRAY FOR CONGRESS

•

Attached please find a copy of the Final Audit Report on

Murray for Congress which was approved by the Commission on

September 26, 1991.

--Informational- copies of the r-epo-'_t_ have ~~~_n_ received by

all parties involved and the report may be released---to--the

public.

Attachaent as stated

cc: Office of General Counsel

Office of Public Disclosure

Reports Analysis Division

FEe Library
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON

MURRAY FOR CONGRESS

MLFoooe97

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of Murray for Congress,

("the Committee"), undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal

Election Commission in accordance with the provisions of the

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act").

The audit was conducted pursuant to section 438(b) of Title 2 of -- -th-eUnited-Sta-t_es__ Cod~ __ ~h~__~_h ;;_~(t.tes in part that the Commission

may conduct audi ts and field invest-ig-a-t-rons--of--any- --pol!t-i--cal----

committee required to file a report under Section 434 of this

title. prior to conducting any audit under this section, the

Commission shall perform an internal review of reports filed by

selected coaaittees to determine if the reports filed by a

particular committee meet the threshold requirements for

substantial coapliance with the Act.

The Com.ittee registered with the Clerk of the House of

Representatives on April 6, 1988 and maintains its headquarters in

Sandusky, Ohio.

The audit covered the period February 15, 1988, through

December 31, 1988. The Committee reported an opening cash balance

of $ -0-; total receipts of $719,427.81; total disbursements of

$848,503.86; and a closing cash balance on December 31, 1988 of

( $126 , 59 2 • 59 ) . ~/

This report is based on documents and workpapers

supporting each of its factual statements. They form part of the

record upon which the Commission based its decisions on the

matters in this report and were available to Commissioners and

appropriate staff for review .

• ~/ The amounts do not foot due to discrepancies in the

reported cash balances.
-2-

B. Key Personnel

During the period covered by the audit, the Treasurer of

the Committee was Lenora K. Drossman.

c. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts, disbursements and individual transactions;

review of required supporting documentation; analysis of debts and

obligations; and other audit procedures as deemed necessary under

the circumstances.

II. Audit Findings and Recommendations

Matters noted during the audit have been referred to the

Commission's Office of General Counsel .

•