alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10179-10180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Uniform Formulary Beneficiary Advisory Panel

AGENCY: Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), Department of 
Defense.

ACTION:  Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Uniform Formulary 
Beneficiary Advisory Panel. The panel will review and comment on 
recommendations made to the Director, TRICARE Management Activity, by 
the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee regarding the Uniform 
Formulary. The

[[Page 10180]]

meeting will be open to the public. Seating is limited and will be 
provided only to the first 220 people signing in. All persons must sign 
in legibly. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: Wednesday, March 22, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Naval Heritage Center Theater, 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Travis Watson, TRICARE 
Management Activity, Pharmaceutical Operations Directorate, Beneficiary 
Advisory Panel, Suite 810, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041, 
telephone 703-681-2890, fax 703-681-1940, or e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0664677674637773637572752846726b6728697562286b6f6a">[email protected]</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Uniform Formulary Beneficiary Advisory 
Panel will only review and comment on the development of the Uniform 
Formulary as reflected in the recommendations of the DOD Pharmacy and 
Therapeutics (P&T) Committee coming out of that body's meeting in 
February 2007. The P&T Committee information and subject matter 
concerning drug classes reviewed for that meeting are available at 
http://pec.ha.osd.mil. Any private citizen is permitted to file a 
written statement with the advisory panel. Statements must be submitted 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0b2b1a0a2b5a1a5b5a3a4a3fe90a4bdb1febfa3b4febdb9bc">[email protected]</a> no later than March 15, 
2007. Any private citizen is permitted to speak at the Beneficiary 
Advisory Panel meeting, time permitting. One hour will be reserved for 
public comments, and speaking times will be assigned only to the first 
twelve citizens to sign up at the meeting, on a first-come, first-
served basis. The amount of time allocated to a speaker will not exceed 
five minutes.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-1059 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PALMER	INTERNATIONAL,	INC.			CONFIDENTIAL Page 1

PROCESS DESCRIPTION OF CNSL MANNICH POLYOL : The new bio

- mannich

- polyol derived from renewable cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) would be produced at onl y one manufacturing plant and shipped direct to our customer. Palmer International, Incorporated would manufacture the bio

- mannich

- pol yol only at their Skippack, PA manufacturing plant. The bio

- mannich

- pol yol is the reaction product of CNSL , paraformaldeh yde, diethanol amine and diisopropanol amine. The manufacturin g plant is trained in the use of hazardous chemicals and currentl y uses paraformaldeh yd e in bulk quantities. REACTI ON The Mannich reaction would be run in a steel reactor vessel, agitated int ernally , ambient pressure, heated by

closed loop thermal oil boiler and cooled via a secondary loop to a water chiller , vented to a thermal oxidizer. The vessel has an outlet to a pump at the lowest point to insure maximum discharge and minimize any residue left in the reactor. The reactor is equipped with a conde nser which is cooled be gl ycol chiller. The reaction would be run by charging the CNSL into the vessel followed by diethanol amine , diisopropanol amine and paraformaldeh yde
. T he reactor is vented through a condenser cooled via chilled gl yc ol line and th en to a thermal oxidizer so that no vapors escape . The materials will be heated to affect reaction. Once the water of reaction is condense d to the collection tank the batch is sampled for in

- process testing. The reaction will be stopped by cooling the batch to <130o F using an external cooling jacket and internal cooling loop. The finished material will be filtered in line and packaged into 50 gallon steel drums. Drumming s ys tem is fitted with a local trunk line exhaust which is vented to the thermal oxidizer. The v essel will not be washed in between batches of the same product during a campaign. After the final batch of a campaign the vessel will be washed by recirculating cleaner through all lines, pumps and valves. The reactor is equipped with a cpi spray head t o allow recirculated wash material to be sprayed over the i nterior vessel walls. The wash material will be stored and re used for the later campaign s . The manufacturing vessel contains a bottom drain to allow full gravity draining. Vessel would be pumped to dry ness via pump below the gravit y drain port.
#### People *ex rel.*Mann v. Mott.

*Highway —powers of commissioners to asses damages.*

Commissioners appointed by the county court to assess damages upon the laying out of a highway, made and signed their assessment, delivered it to one of the commissioners of highways, who filed it with the town clerk. They subsequently made and filed another assessment. *Held,*that the power of the commissioners to assess was expended when they signed the first determination, and they could not review their action, and an appeal taken more than twenty days after the first assessment was filed, although within twenty days of the filing of the second, was too late.

Cebtiobabi upon the relation of John Mann, directed to Jacob Mott, and others, commissioners of highways and town clerk of the town of Greenburgh, Westchester county, to review the proceedings had upon the assessment of relator’s damages for laying out a highway in said town.

The highway mentioned was laid out by proceedings duly taken for that purpose by the commissioners of highways. Three commissioners were appointed by the county court, to assess the damages for the laying out of said highway. They met, acted, and agreed upon an assessment, which was signed by all of them. This assessment bears date January 9, 1873, and was delivered to one of the highway commissioners of said town, who filed the same in the town clerk’s office January 18, 1873. By this assessment the damages of the relator were assessed at 8600. ' On the 29th of January, 1873, the commissioners to assess again met and conferred upon the subject of said assessment, and made and signed a supplementary assessment, which was delivered to one of the commissioners of highways and filed in the town clerk’s office on the 14th of February, 1873. On the 25th of February, 1873, an appeal was taken, a notice being served on the town clerk asking for a jury to re-assess damages. A jury was duly drawn and a re-assessment made by them, in which the damages of relator were assessed at six cents.

*J. O. Dykman,*for relator.

*L. T. Yale*and *C. Frost,*for respondents,

cited *Woolsey*v. *Tompkins,*23 Wend. 324; *Hallock*v. *Woolsey,*id. 328; *Matter of Lewis*
      *208
      *St., 2*Wend. 472, 476; *Livingston*v. *Mayor of New York,*8 Wend. 85, 100; *Matter of Furman St.,*17 Wend. 651, 662; *People*v. *Board of Assessors,*39 N. Y. 81.

Barnard, P. J.

The commissioners appointed hy the county court to assess the damages occasioned to the several owners hy the laying out the road in question, expended their powers when they made and signed their written determination dated the 9th of January, 1873, and delivered the same to the commissioners of highways. They could not again meet to review the same, or to correct errors therein. It would be an evil precedent to establish, that a board of commissioners to assess damages may save an appeal by giving a new certificate of assessment.

The subsequent proceedings, so far as they affect the relator, must be held void, for the reason that no valid appeal has been taken from the original assessment.

*Be-assessment set aside.*
§ 672.16 Objections and offers of proof. ( a ) *Objection.* Any objection concerning the conduct of the hearing may be made orally or in writing during the hearing. The party raising the objection must supply a short statement of its grounds. The ruling by the Presiding Officer on any objection and the reasons given for it shall be part of the record. An exception to each objection overruled shall be automatic and is not waived by further participation in the hearing.
( b ) *Offer of proof.* Whenever evidence is excluded from the record, the party offering the evidence may make an offer of proof, which shall be included in the record. The offer of proof for excluded oral testimony shall consist of a brief statement describing the nature of the evidence excluded. The offer of proof for excluded documents or exhibits shall consist of the insertion in the record of the documents or exhibits excluded.
§ 79.10 Default upon failure to file an answer. ( a ) If the defendant does not file an answer within the time prescribed in § 79.9(a), the reviewing official may refer the complaint to the ALJ.
( b ) Upon the referral of the complaint, the ALJ shall promptly serve on the defendant in the manner prescribed in § 79.8, a notice that an initial decision will be issued under this section.
( c ) The ALJ shall assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true and, if such facts establish liability under § 79.3, the ALJ shall issue an initial decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under the statute.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, by failing to file a timely answer, the defendant waives any right to further review of the penalties and assessments imposed under paragraph (c) of this section, and the initial decision shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after it is issued.
( e ) If, before such an initial decision becomes final, the defendant files a motion with the ALJ seeking to reopen on the grounds that extraordinary circumstances prevented the defendant from filing an answer, the initial decision shall be stayed pending the ALJ's decision on the motion.
( f ) If, on such motion, the defendant can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances excusing the failure to file a timely answer, the ALJ shall withdraw the initial decision in paragraph (c) of this section, if such a decision has been issued, and shall grant the defendant an opportunity to answer the complaint.
( g ) A decision of the ALJ denying a defendant's motion under paragraph (e) of this section is not subject to reconsideration under § 79.38.
( h ) The defendant may appeal to the authority head the decision denying a motion to reopen by filing a notice of appeal with the authority head within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal shall stay the initial decision until the authority head decides the issue.
( i ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the authority head, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( j ) The authority head shall decide expeditiously whether extraordinary circumstances excuse the defendant's failure to file a timely answer based solely on the record before the ALJ.
( k ) If the authority head decides that extraordinary circumstances excuse the defendant's failure to file a timely answer, the authority head shall remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant the defendant an opportunity to answer.
( l ) If the authority head decides that the defendant's failure to file a timely answer is not excused, the authority head shall reinstate the initial decision of the ALJ, which shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the authority head issues such decision.
#### Stevens, appellant, v. Bostwick.

*Coverture*— *when it must he pleaded.*

In an action by a married woman for goods sold¡ etc., *held,*that the defense that plaintiff was married and had no separate estate or business was not available when not set up in the answer.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought in Genesee county by Harriet C. Stevens against Homer Bostwick, administrator of the estate of Edward Stevens, deceased, for goods sold, money lent and board furnished intestate. The plaintiff was a married woman, but in the complaint was no averment of that fact, or that she carried on business in her own name or had separate property, the action being brought as if plaintiff was a *feme sole.*The answer was a general denial and payment and a counter-claim.

The referee before whom the action was tried found, as a matter of fact, that during the time of the contracting of the indebtedness of - intestate plaintiff was a married woman "having no separate estate, and transacting or carrying on no business on her separate account, and as a conclusion of law that plaintiff was not entitled to recover. >

*A. Stevens,*for appellant.

*Peck & Boioen,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The referee clearly erred in dismissing the complaint in this action. The complaint set out a cause of action upon its face in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The answer denied the complaint and set up a counter-claim.

If the defendant intended to make the defense that the plaintiff was a married woman and had no separate estate, or carried on no separate trade or business, he should have set up such a defense by answer. *Freeking*v. *Holland,*53 N. Y. *422.*

Coverture must be pleaded to be available if intended to be set up as a defense. 1 Ghitty on Plead. 449; *Dillaye*v. *Parks, 31*Barb. *132.*In *Hallock*v. *DeMunn, 2*N. Y. Sup. 350, where it was held that *633-to maintain an action against a married woman it must be shown that the debt was contracted for the purpose of carrying on a separate trade or business and for the benefit of her separate estate, and the answer in proper form set up the defense in a denial of these facts, no question as to the form of the pleadings was -presented for consideration.

The judgment should be reversed and a n"ew trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

*Judgment, reversed and new trial granted.*
§ 1356.30 Safety requirements for foster care and adoptive home providers. ( a ) The title IV-E agency must provide documentation that criminal records checks have been conducted with respect to prospective foster and adoptive parents.
( b ) The title IV-E agency may not approve or license any prospective foster or adoptive parent, nor may the title IV-E agency claim FFP for any foster care maintenance or adoption assistance payment made on behalf of a child placed in a foster home operated under the auspices of a child placing agency or on behalf of a child placed in an adoptive home through a private adoption agency, if the title IV-E agency finds that, based on a criminal records check conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the prospective foster or adoptive parent has been convicted of a felony involving: ( 1 ) Child abuse or neglect;
( 2 ) Spousal abuse;
( 3 ) A crime against a child or children (including child pornography); or,
( 4 ) A crime involving violence, including rape, sexual assault, or homicide, but not including other physical assault or battery.
( c ) The title IV-E agency may not approve or license any prospective foster or adoptive parent, nor may the title IV-E agency claim FFP for any foster care maintenance or adoption assistance payment made on behalf of a child placed in a foster home operated under the auspices of a child placing agency or on behalf of a child placed in an adoptive home through a private adoption agency, if the title IV-E agency finds, based on a criminal records check conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, that a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the prospective foster or adoptive parent has, within the last five years, been convicted of a felony involving: ( 1 ) Physical assault;
( 2 ) Battery; or,
( 3 ) A drug-related offense.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) In all cases where the State opted out of the criminal records check requirement, as permitted prior to the amendments made by section 152 of Public Law 109-248, the licensing file for that foster or adoptive family must contain documentation which verifies that safety considerations with respect to the caretaker(s) have been addressed.
( f ) In order for a child care institution to be eligible for title IV-E funding, the licensing file for the institution must contain documentation which verifies that safety considerations with respect to the staff of the institution have been addressed.
[65 FR 4090, Jan. 25, 2000, as amended at 77 FR 949, Jan. 6, 2012]
#### § 703.3 Scope of subject matter.

The scope of the subject matter to be dealt with by Advisory Committees shall be those subjects of inquiry or study with which the Commission itself is authorized to investigate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1975(a). Each Advisory Committee shall confine its studies to the State covered by its charter. It may, however, subject to the requirements of § 703.4, undertake to study, within the limitations of the Act, subjects other than those chosen by the Commission for study.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Siena Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Anthony DeLise,  Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                  |  | 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                        |  |                                                                  |  | 
|Date: November 19, 2007 |  |                                                                  |  | 
|                        |  | /s/ Anthony Delise
Anthony Delise                                |  | 
|                        |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |  |
- 81070160601
- 81070160602
- 81070160603
- 81070160604
- 81070160605
- 81070160606
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IVORY JENKINS

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below

, Appellee. §

§ No. 409, 2017

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1 6 07011213 ( K )

§

§

§

§

Submitted: March 2 8 , 2018

Decided: April 5 , 2018

ORDER

This 5 th day of April 2018 , it appears to the Court that , on March 15 , 2018

,

the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant to show cause why

t his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and

appendix on or before the March 5, 2018 deadline . The appellant has not responded

to the notice to show cause within the required ten

- day period and has not filed his

opening brief and appendix. D ismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be

unopp o sed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule s 3(b)(2)

and 29 (b) , that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 68818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9430]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the tenth meeting of the American Health 
Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health 
Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific 
actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health 
information technology (IT).

DATES: December 12, 2006, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Community will discuss state-federal 
health information exchange technology and coordination, the 
development of proto-use cases, and an update on the Personalized 
Healthcare Workgroup.
    A Web cast of the Community meeting will be available on the NIH 
Web site at: http://www.videocast.nih.gov/.
    If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 
690-7151.

    Dated: November 16, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-9430 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M