alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 601.2 Classification authority.

The Foundation does not have original classification authority under Executive Order 12958. In any instance where a Foundation employee develops information that appears to warrant classification because of its national security character, the material will be afforded protection and sent to the Division of Administrative Services (DAS). Upon determination that classification is warranted, DAS will submit such material to the agency that has appropriate subject matter interest and classification authority.

[47 FR 57284, Dec. 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 51021, Sept. 30, 1996]
# CE2010045EN.01010801.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/108

---

Units of measurement ***II

P6_TA(2008)0596

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2008 on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 80/181/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement (11915/3/2008 — C6-0425/2008 — 2007/0187(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/32)

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council common position (11915/3/2008 — C6-0425/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council common position (11915/3/2008 — C6-0425/2008),

| — | having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0510), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0510),

1

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

| — | having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6-0476/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6-0476/2008),

1.   Approves the common position;

2.   Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

3.   Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

4.   Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

5.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 297 E, 20.11.2008, p. 105.

1

---
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) All-22 

Audit Division Recommendation ) Agenda Document No. 14-18 

Memorandum on the State Democratic ) 

Executive Committee of Alabama ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on March 18,2014 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in 

the above-captioned matter: 

1. Failedby avoteof 3-3 to: 

Approve the recommendation for the Recordkeeping Finding as set forth 

in Agenda Document No. 14-18, including the failure to keep monthly 

time-logs for the $279,429 in payroll consistmg of payments allocated 

between federal and non-federal funds and 100% non-federal payments, 

subject to an amendment to include the $ 110,908 paid to contract workers. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted afjQrmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen dissented. 

2. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Approve die recommendation for the Recordkeeping Finding as set forth 

in Agenda Document No. 14-18, related to the failure to keep monthly 

time-logs for the $248,930 in payroll allocated between federal and non-federal 

funds; and direct the Audit Division to include in the Proposed Final Audit Report 

an Additional Issues section addressing the $30,499 for 100% non-federal payments. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date'. ' ShawnWlfocttieadWerth 7 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Research Data Management.                     

*Date:*                         March 19, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive                               ( print page 10774)                            Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 9529, Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5388,                         *wiethorp@ninds.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: March 1, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1092  Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# CE2009184EN.01011802.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/118 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/118

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0044

P6_TA(2008)0044

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 February 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (codified version) (COM(2007)0667 — C6-0397/2007 — 2007/0235(COD))

2009/C 184 E/29

(Codecision procedure: codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0667),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0397/2007),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0020/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 12046 A
Regulatory Docket No

. FAA

– 20 15

– 1534

Mr. Dennis Dickinson

COO & Chief Pilot
SupraOptix, LLC

10971 Four Seasons Place, MB8

Crown Point, IN 46307

Dear Mr. Dickinson :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains
the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) on behalf of SupraOptix, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for

an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),
91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You requested an amendment to change the company name from AerOptix, LLC to SupraOptix,

LLC

. 1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons
relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the origina l exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a
precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be d etrimental to the petitioner

.

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the
FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the pet itioner.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12046
remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is
granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, SupraOptix, LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All
conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12046 remain in effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be
grounds for the immediate suspe nsion or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on July 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
§ 705.95 Accounting of the disclosures of records. ( a ) All disclosures of records covered by this part, except for the exemptions listed in paragraph (b) of this section, shall be accounted for by keeping a written record of the particular record disclosed, the name and address of the person or agency to whom or to which disclosed, and the date, nature, and purpose of the disclosure.
( b ) No accounting is required for disclosures of records to those officials and employees of the Commission who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties or if disclosure would be required under the Freedom of Information Act. 5 U.S.C. 552.
( c ) The accounting shall be maintained for 5 years or until the record is destroyed or transferred to the National Archives and Records Administrator for storage, in which event, the accounting pertaining to those records, unless maintained separately, shall be transferred with the records themselves.
( d ) The accounting of disclosures may be recorded in any system the Commission determines is sufficient for this purpose, however, the Commission must be able to construct from its system a listing of all disclosures. The system of accounting of disclosures is not a system of records under the definition in § 705.2(e) and no accounting need be maintained for disclosure of the accounting of disclosures.
( e ) Upon request of an individual to whom a record pertains, the accounting of the disclosures of that record shall be made available to the requester, provided that he or she has complied with § 705.3(a) and with § 705.4(c) or (d).
#### § 79.44 Right to administrative offset.

The amount of any penalty or assessment which has become final, or for which a judgment has been entered under § 79.42 or § 79.43, or any amount agreed upon in a compromise or settlement under § 79.46, may be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, except that an administrative offset may not be made under this subsection against a refund of an overpayment of Federal taxes, then or later owing by the United States to the defendant.
The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2315

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Frank Terrasas, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 30, 1998

 Filed: January 6, 1999

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frank Terrasas was charged with conspiring to distribute marijuana in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Terrasas appeals the judgment of the district court, entered upon 1

the jury&s verdict finding him guilty of the charge. After a careful review of the record,

we conclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government,

was sufficient to support Terrasas&s conviction. See United States v. McCracken, 110

F.3d 535, 540 (8th Cir. 1997); United States v. Cunningham, 83 F.3d 218, 222 (8th Cir.
-2-

1996) (standard of review); United States v. Johnson, 12 F.3d 827, 831-32 (8th Cir.

1994), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 (1994). 

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### DANIEL *v.*THE STATE.

In tie trial of a murder case it is erroneous to charge, “If a person receives a wound which was wilfully and unlawfully inflicted by another under, such circumstances that it would be murder if death ensue, and death actually results, the burden is then on him who inflicted it to show that it did not cause the death.

Argued October 15,

Decided November 7, 1906.

Conviction of manslaughter. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court. June 21, 1906.

*Fort & Grice,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. D.*Graham, solicitor-general, contra.

Cobb, P. J.

The accused and three others were indicted for murder. The accused was placed on trial and convicted of voluntary manslaughter, and he assigns error upon the refusal of a new trial. * It appears from the evidence that the accused and at least two of the other persons fired upon the deceased. Two wounds were found upon the body,- — one upon the arm and one in the thigh. The evidence authorized a finding that the wound in the arm was inflicted by the shot fired by the accused, and that the wound in the thigh resulted from the shot fired by one of the others. Death resulted from the wound in the thigh. _ The judge charged the jury that, “If a person receives a wound which was wilfully and unlawfully inflicted by another under such circumstances that it would be murder if death ensue, and death actually results, the burden is then on him who inflicted it to show that it did not cause the death; but the evidence to do this may come from the *542State’s evidence.” The evidence was entirely sufficient to establish that the death resulted from the wound in tfc.e thigh. There was little or no evidence to show that death resulted from the wound in the arm. The effect of the instruction was, therefore, that unless the accused made it appear, either from the State’s evidence or otherwise, that death did not result from the wound in the arm, the accused would be guilty. We think this was an error so prejudicial in its nature as to require the reversal of the judgment. The burden was upon the State to show beyond a reasonable doubt, not only .that the accused inflicted a wound under such circumstances that if death ensued the accused would be guilty of murder, but also to a like degree of certainty that death actually resulted from the wound inflicted. Until this was done, the burden was not shifted to the accused. The motion for a new trial contains numerous grounds, but we do not deem it necessary to enter into a discussion of the other assignments of error. Many of them are based upon the theory that the instructions were not adjusted to the evidence; and upon another trial the judge will no doubt see that his charge is relieved from this criticism.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1709-1710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Emerald Coast 
Technology Group, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Emerald Coast Technology Group, LLC, a revocable, non-
assignable, exclusive license to practice in the United States, the 
Government-owned invention described in U.S. Patent No. 6,893,540: HIGH 
TEMPERATURE PELTIER EFFECT WATER DISTILLER issued May 17, 2005, Navy 
Case No. 82,363.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has 
fifteen (15) days from the date of this notice to file written 
objections along with supporting evidence, if any.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with Naval Surface 
Warfare Center Panama City, 110 Vernon Avenue, Code CP0L, Panama City, 
FL 32407-7001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Shepherd, Patent Counsel, 
Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City, 110 Vernon Avenue, Panama 
City, FL 32407-7001, telephone <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#086269656d7b267c267b606d78606d7a6c4866697e7126656164"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb7bcb0b8aef3a9f3aeb5b8adb5b8afb99db3bcaba4f3b0b4b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404)


[[Page 1710]]


    Dated: December 19, 2006.
M. A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-115 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1.    Jiangsu Linyang Solarfun Co., Ltd. (PRC)

2.    Linyang Solar Power Investment Holding Ltd. (BVI)

3.    Shanghai Linyang Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC)

4.    Sichuan Leshan Jiayang New Energy Co., Ltd. (PRC)

5.    Jiangsu Yangguang Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (PRC)

6.    Solarfun Power U.S.A. Inc. (USA)

7.    Jiangsu Linyang Solarfun Engineering Research and Development
      Center Co., Ltd. (PRC)

8.    Solarfun Power Hong Kong Limited (Hong Kong)

9.    Solarfun Power Deutschland GmbH (Germany)
#### § 86.11 Application.

Except as provided in this subpart, this part 86 applies to every recipient and to the education program or activity operated by such recipient which receives Federal financial assistance.

(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)

[40 FR 24137, June 4, 1975, as amended at 70 FR 24321, May 9, 2005]
Exhibit 32.1 - President and CFO Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Tropical PC,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate
in connection with the Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-KSB/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Jorge Moreno
--------------------------
     Jorge Moreno
     President/CFO


Date  August 28, 2008
      ---------------


<PAGE>