11846 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices 

VIII. Additional Information 

A. Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal 

Numbering System (DUNS) 

A DUNS number is a unique ninedigit sequence recognized as the 

universal standard for identifying and 

keeping track of over 70 million 

businesses worldwide. The Office of 

Management and Budget published a 

notice of final policy issuance in the 

Federal Register June 27, 2003 (68 FR 

38402) that requires a DUNS number in 

every application (i.e., hard copy and 

electronic) for a grant or cooperative 

agreement on or after October 1, 2003. 

Therefore, potential applicants should 

verify that they have a DUNS number or 

take the steps needed to obtain one. For 

information about how to obtain a 

DUNS number, go to http:// 

www.grants.gov. Please note that the 

registration may take up to 14 business 

days to complete. 

B. Required Registration With the 

Central Contract Registry for 

Submission of Proposals 

The Central Contract Registry (CCR) is 

a database that serves as the primary 

Government repository for contractor 

information required for the conduct of 

business with the Government. This 

database will also be used as a central 

location for maintaining organizational 

information for organizations seeking 

and receiving grants from the 

Government. Such organizations must 

register in the CCR prior to the 

submission of applications. A DUNS 

number is needed for CCR registration. 

For information about how to register in 

the CCR, visit ’’Get Started’’ at the Web 

site, http://www.grants.gov. Allow a 

minimum of 5 business days to 

complete the CCR registration. 

C. Related Programs 

Funding availability for this program 

may be announced at approximately the 

same time as funding availability for 

similar but separate programs—CFDA 

No. 10.455 (Community Outreach and 

Assistance Partnerships), CFDA No. 

10.456 (Risk Management Research 

Partnerships), CFDA No. 10.457 

(Commodity Partnerships for Risk 

Management Education), and CFDA No. 

10.459 (Commodity Partnerships Small 

Sessions Program). These programs have 

some similarities, but also key 

differences. The differences stem from 

important features of each program’s 

authorizing legislation and different 

RMA objectives. Prospective applicants 

should carefully examine and compare 

the notices for each program. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on March 8, 

2007. 

Eldon Gould, 

Manager, Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. E7–4594 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

30-Day Pre-Decisional Review and 

Opportunity To Object; Cimarron and 

Comanche National Grasslands Land 

Management Plan (Grasslands Plan) 

AGENCY: The Pike and San Isabel 

National Forests and the Cimarron and 

Comanche National Grasslands, Forest 

Service, U.S.D.A. 

Authority: 36 CFR 219.9(b)(2)(i) and 36 

CFR 219.9(b)(2)(iii). 

NOTICE: Availability of the Cimarron and 

Comanche National Grasslands Land 

Management Plan (Grasslands Plan), 

and 30-Day Pre-decisional Review and 

Objection Period. 

SUMMARY: The Forest Supervisor for the 

Pike and San Isabel National Forests 

and the Cimarron and Comanche 

National Grasslands (PSICC) has made 

available the Cimarron and Comanche 

National Grasslands Land Management 

Plan (Grasslands Plan) for a 30-day predecisional review and objection period. 

The 30-day pre-decisional review and 

objection period commences the day 

following the publication of the legal 

notice in the Pueblo Chieftain, Pueblo, 

Colorado. 

DATES: March 8, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barb 

Masinton, 719–553–1475. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest 

Supervisor for the PSICC has announced 

a 30-day pre-decisional review and 

objection period for the Grasslands Plan, 

as provided by 36 CFR 219.13(a). The 

30-day pre-decisional review and 

objection period will commence the day 

following the publication date of the 

legal notice in the Pueblo Chieftain, 

Pueblo, Colorado. The publication date 

of the legal notice in this newspaper of 

record is the exclusive means for 

calculating the time to file an objection 

(see January 2006 Forest Service 

Handbook 1909.12, Chapter 50, section 

51.13b). 

Objections may be filed only by nonfederal agencies, organizations and 

individuals who participated in the 

planning process through the 

submission of written comments to the 

Forest Service pertaining to the 

Grasslands Plan or supporting 

documents. It is helpful to reference 

your earlier written comments to 

document your standing in this 

objection process. These objections 

must be: (a) In writing, (b) submitted to 

the Grasslands Plan Reviewing Officer 

(Regional Forester, Rocky Mountain 

Region), and (c) submitted during the 

30-day pre-decisional review and 

objection period. Additionally, 

objections must contain the following: 

1. The name, mailing address, and 

telephone number of the person or 

entity filing the objection. Where a 

single objection is filed by more than 

one person, the objection must indicate 

the lead objector to contact. The 

Reviewing Officer may appoint the first 

name listed as the lead objector to act 

on behalf of all parties to the single 

objection when the single objection does 

not specify a lead objector. The 

Reviewing Officer may communicate 

directly with the lead objector and is not 

required to notify the other listed 

objectors about the objection response 

or any other written correspondence 

related to the single objection; 

2. A statement of the issues and the 

parts of the Grasslands Plan to which 

the objection applies, and how the 

objecting party would be adversely 

affected; 

3. A concise statement explaining 

how the objector believes that the 

Grasslands Plan in inconsistent with 

law, regulation, or policy, or how the 

objector disagrees with the decision, 

and providing any recommendations for 

change; and 

4. A signature or other verification of 

authorship is required (a scanned 

signature when filing electronically is 

acceptable). 

The written notice of objection, 

including attachments, must be 

submitted to the Grasslands Plan 

Reviewing Officer for the Rocky 

Mountain Region by mail, e-mail, fax, 

hand-delivery, express delivery, or 

messenger service. 

Objections sent by the U.S. Postal 

Service must be mailed to: USDA Forest 

Service, Rocky Mountain Region, 

ATTN: Rick Cables, Regional Forester 

and Grasslands Plan Reviewing Officer, 

P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, CO 80225. 

E-mail: Electronically-filed objections 

will be accepted at: objections-rockymountain-regional-office@fs.fed.us. 

E-mailed objections must be in 

Microsoft Word, Corel WordPerfect, or 

rich text format (.rtf) file formats. For 

electronically-mailed objections, the 

sender should typically receive an 

automated electronic acknowledgment 

from the agency as confirmation of 

receipt. If the sender does not receive an 

automated acknowledgement of the 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices 11847 

receipt of the objection, it is the sender’s 

responsibility to ensure timely receipt 

by other means. 

Fax: The number to use for faxing 

written objections is: (303) 275–5482. 

Objections that are delivered by hand, 

by express delivery, or messenger 

service must be done so during business 

hours, Monday through Friday 

(excluding holidays) from 7:30 a.m. 

until 4:30 p.m., Mountain Time, at: 

USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain 

Region, ATTN: Rick Cables, Regional 

Forester and Grasslands Plan Reviewing 

Officer, 740 Simms Street, Golden, CO 

80401. 

Objections must be postmarked, emailed, faxed, or hand-delivered within 

30 days following the date of 

publication of the legal notice in the 

Pueblo Chieftain, Pueblo, Colorado. 

The pre-decisional Grasslands Plan 

and supporting documents can be 

accessed, viewed, and downloaded at 

the following Web site: http:// 

www.fs.fed.us/r2/psicc/projects/ 

forest_revision/. The Grasslands Plan is 

also available in paper copy or compact 

disc (CD) formats by request. 

Note that all objections, including 

names and addresses, become part of 

the public record and are subject to 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 

requests, except for proprietary 

documents and information. 

Dated: March 8, 2007. 

Robert J. Leaverton, 

Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 07–1178 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–ES–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

North American Free-Trade 

Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel 

Reviews; Request for Panel Review 

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United 

States Section, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of First Request for Panel 

Review. 

SUMMARY: On March 2, 2007, Mueller 

Industries, Inc. (Memphis, Tennessee), 

Streamline Copper & Brass Ltd. 

(Strathroy, Ontario) and affiliated 

companies within the Mueller Group 

(collectively referred to herein as 

‘‘Mueller’’) are the interested Parties; 

filed a First Request for Panel Review 

with the Canadian Section of the 

NAFTA Secretariat pursuant to Article 

1904 of the North American Free Trade 

Agreement. Panel review was requested 

of the final determination of dumping 

made by the Canada Border Services 

Agency, respecting Certain Copper Pipe 

Fittings Originating In Or Exported 

From the United States of America. This 

determination was published in the 

Canada Gazette, Part I, (Vol. 141, No. 5, 

pp. 188) on February 3, 2007. The 

NAFTA Secretariat has assigned Case 

Number CDA–USA–2007–1904–01 to 

this request. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Caratina L. Alston, United States 

Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 

2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 

Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 

19 of the North American Free-Trade 

Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a 

mechanism to replace domestic judicial 

review of final determinations in 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

cases involving imports from a NAFTA 

country with review by independent 

binational panels. When a Request for 

Panel Review is filed, a panel is 

established to act in place of national 

courts to review expeditiously the final 

determination to determine whether it 

conforms with the antidumping or 

countervailing duty law of the country 

that made the determination. 

Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, 

which came into force on January 1, 

1994, the Government of the United 

States, the Government of Canada and 

the Government of Mexico established 

Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 

Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’). 

These Rules were published in the 

Federal Register on February 23, 1994 

(59 FR 8686). 

A first Request for Panel Review was 

filed with the Canadian Section of the 

NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article 

1904 of the Agreement, on March 2, 

2007, requesting panel review of the 

final determination described above. 

The Rules provide that: 

(a) A Party or interested person may 

challenge the final determination in 

whole or in part by filing a Complaint 

in accordance with Rule 39 within 30 

days after the filing of the first Request 

for Panel Review (the deadline for filing 

a Complaint is April 2, 2007); 

(b) A Party, investigating authority or 

interested person that does not file a 

Complaint but that intends to appear in 

support of any reviewable portion of the 

final determination may participate in 

the panel review by filing a Notice of 

Appearance in accordance with Rule 40 

within 45 days after the filing of the first 

Request for Panel Review (the deadline 

for filing a Notice of Appearance is 

April 16, 2007); and 

(c) The panel review shall be limited 

to the allegations of error of fact or law, 

including the jurisdiction of the 

investigating authority, that are set out 

in the Complaints filed in the panel 

review and the procedural and 

substantive defenses raised in the panel 

review. 

Dated: March 8, 2007. 

Caratina L. Alston, 

United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. E7–4570 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

North American Free-Trade 

Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel 

Reviews; Notice of Completion of 

Panel Review 

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United 

States Section, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Completion of Panel 

Review of the final remand 

determination of the antidumping duty 

administrative review and 

determination not to revoke made by the 

U.S. International Trade 

Administration, in the matter of Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Mexico, 

Secretariat File No. USA/MEX–2001–

1904–05. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Order of the 

Binational Panel dated January 16, 2007, 

affirming the final remand 

determination described above was 

completed on January 16, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Caratina L. Alston, United States 

Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 

2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 

Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 16, 2007, the Binational Panel 

issued an order which affirmed the final 

remand determination of the United 

States International Trade 

Administration (‘‘ITA’’) concerning Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Mexico. 

The Secretariat was instructed to issue 

a Notice of Completion of Panel Review 

on the 31st day following the issuance 

of the Notice of Final Panel Action, if 

no request for an Extraordinary 

Challenge was filed. No such request 

was filed. Therefore, on the basis of the 

Panel Order and Rule 80 of the Article 

1904 Panel Rules, the Panel Review was 

completed and the panelists discharged 

from their duties effective March 5, 

2007. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES