alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2519.120 What is the Federal Work-Study requirement?

To be eligible for assistance under this part, an institution of higher education must demonstrate that it meets the minimum requirements under section 443(b)(2)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 2753(b)(2)(A)) relating to the participation of students employed under part C of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 2751 *et seq.*) (relating to Federal Work-Study programs) in community service activities, or has received a waiver of those requirements from the Secretary of Education.

[74 FR 46505, Sept. 10, 2009]
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 3 (Friday, January 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9990]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, January 9, 2007.

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The one item is open to the public.

Matter to be Considered: 7695B, Aircraft Accident Report--Crash of 
Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701, Bombardier CL-600-2B19, N8396A, 
Jefferson City, Missouri, October 14, 2004.

News Media Contact: Terry Williams: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, January 5, 2007.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: December 29, 2006.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-9990 Filed 12-29-06; 12:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
```
#### § 331.18 Restrictions.

The District Engineer may establish and post a schedule of visiting hours and/or restrictions on the public use of a portion or portions of the WCA. The District Engineer may close or restrict the use of the WCA or portion of the WCA when necessitated by reason of public health, public safety, security, maintenance, or other reasons in the public interest. Entering or using the project in a manner which is contrary to the schedule of visiting hours, closure or restrictions is prohibited.
#### § 2554.49 How are civil penalties and assessments collected?

Section 3806 and 3808(b) of title 31, United States Code, authorize actions for collection of civil penalties and assessments imposed under this Part and specify the procedures for such actions.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the quarterly report for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-QSB) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/        Jeffrey  R.  HultmanJeffrey  R.  HultmanChief  Executive  OfficerDated:  August 14,  2006 /s/  Christopher  G.  PizzoChristopher  G.  PizzoChief  Financial  OfficerDated:  August 14,  2006
§ 2505.7 What are the procedures for changing the time or place of a meeting following the public announcement? ( a ) After there has been a public announcement of a meeting, the time or place of the meeting may be changed only if the Board publicly announces the change at the earliest practicable time. Such a change need not be determined by recorded vote.
( b ) After there has been a public announcement of a meeting, the subject-matter of the meeting, or the determination of the Board to open or to close a meeting may be changed only when— ( 1 ) The Board determines, by recorded vote, that Board business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible; and
( 2 ) The Board publicly announces the change and the vote of each Member at the earliest practicable time.
( c ) The deletion of any subject-matter previously announced for a meeting is not a change requiring the approval of the Board under paragraph (b) of this section.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7854

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-100)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished opinion per curiam opinion.

James Edward Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne Margaret Hayes, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Ellerbe filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss

for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of

appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). A post-conviction motion for

return of property filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) is a civil

action. See United States v. Garcia, 65 F.3d 17, 20 (4th Cir.

1995). In civil actions in which the United States or an officer

or agency thereof is a party, a party is accorded sixty days within

which to file in the district court a notice of appeal from

judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only

exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends

the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on October 1, 1998;

Ellerbe’s notice of appeal was dated December 6, and filed on

December 14, 1998, both of which are beyond the sixty-day appeal

period. Ellerbe’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an

extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Ellerbe’s appeal. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
3

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railroad Company, *Appellant,*to acquire lands of William Genwitts and others, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-701 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MONACO 

Signed at Monaco March 24, 2007 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MONACO 

Judicial Assistance 

Agreement signed at Monaco March 24, 2007; 

 Entered into force July 1, 2007.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 9071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02785]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Public Availability of the National Endowment for the Humanities 
FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2012 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the National 
Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is publishing this notice to advise 
the public of the availability of the FY 2012 Service Contract 
Inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2012. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2011 by the 
Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy 
(OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement-service-contract-inventories. NEH has posted its FY 2012 
inventory on its Web site at the following link: www.neh.gov/about/legal/reports.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Barry Maynes in the 
Administrative Services Office at (202) 606-8233 or bmaynes@neh.gov.

    Dated: February 4, 2013.
Michael P. McDonald,
General Counsel and Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-02785 Filed 2-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this 

e-mail because the mail box is unattended. 

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits 

attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all 

documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply 

to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. 

However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

District of Columbia

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 12/16/2015 at 3:42 PM EDT and filed on 12/16/2015 

Docket Text:

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal [16], it is 

hereby ORDERED that Defendant Federal Election Commission's Motion for Summary Judgment 

[7] is DENIED as moot, and the case is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss 

on 12/16/2015. (lcrdm3, ) 

1:14-cv-00970-RDM Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

Steve Nicholas Hajjar 

Kevin Deeley 

Erin R Chlopak 

Allen Joseph Dickerson 

1:14-cv-00970-RDM Notice will be delivered by other means to:: 

Activity in Case 1:14-cv-00970-RDM CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS v. FEDERAL 

ELECTION COMMISSION Order on Motion for Summary Judgment

DCD_ECFNotice 

to:

DCD_ECFNotice

12/16/2015 03:43 PM

Bcc:

Hide Details 

From: DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov

To: DCD ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov, 

Bcc: 

Case Name: CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Case Number: 1:14-cv-00970-RDM

Filer:

Document Number:No document attached
#### Michael O’Dwyer, Respondent, *v.*The Castle Square Opera Company, Appellant.

*O'Dwyer*v. *Castle Square Opera Co., 127*App. Div. 926, affirmed.

(Argued October 12, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 25, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for labor performed and materials furnished.

*Morris Grossman*for appellant.

*Burton W. Gibson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2446

BENJAMIN JACOB STRATTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Catheryn K. Clemens, Michael L. McGinty , Defendant

- Appellee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv
- 00046

- RAJ

- RJK )

Submitted : March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Benjamin Jacob Stratton, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry A. Fox, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM : Benjamin Jacob Stratton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we aff i rm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stra tton v. Commonwealth of Va. , No. 4:17

- cv
- 00046

- RAJ

- RJK (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
p rocess. AFFIRMED
Amendment
  Agreement
    Waiver of Contingencies; Extension of Feasibility Period as to Remaining Due Diligence
Contingencies
 Delivery of Second Deposit
 1




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Effect of Amendment
 Entire Agreement
 Counterparts
 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 2




---



##### 



SELLER
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Mark PetersonIts:
    Mark Peterson, Senior Vice President,Chief Legal Officer and SecretaryBUYER
CITY VENTURES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ R. Mark BucklundIts:
    R. Mark Buckland, President 3
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Philip H. Neher, Deceased. The National Bank of Troy, Appellant; James H. Carpenter, as Executor, Respondent.

*Matter of Neher,*138 App. Div. 883, affirmed.

(Submitted November 8, 1909;

decided November 23, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 21, 1908, which affirmed an order of the Rensselaer County Surrogate’s Court dismissing a petition under section 2722 of the Code of Civil Procedure for an order directing the payment of an alleged claim.

*566
      *Samuel Foster*and *B. F. De Groot*for appellant.

*William 0. Gordon*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann,Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Hiscock, J.
---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-158443) regarding the registration
of 5,000,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan of Royal Mines And Minerals Corp. (the "Company") of our report
dated July 27, 2009 relating to the April 30, 2009 audited financial statements
of the Company which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for that
period.

|"Sarna & Company"            | 
|---------------------------- | 
|Sarna & Company              | 
|Certified Public Accountants | 
|                             | 
|Westlake Village, CA         | 
|July 28, 2009                | 

---
§ 284.35 What action will we take in response to the State's assessment and other information? ( a ) We will review the State's assessment along with other available information. If we determine that the increase in the child poverty rate of five percent or more is not the result of the TANF program(s) in the State, we will notify the State that no further information from, or action by, the State is required for the applicable two-calendar-year period.
( b ) Based on our review of the State's assessment and other information, if we determine that the increase in the State's child poverty rate of five percent or more is the result of the TANF program(s) in the State, we will notify the State that it must submit a corrective action plan as specified in §§ 284.40 and 284.45.
'UNITEDSTATESENVIReNMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY REGIONVIII 999 18thSTREET

...SUITE500 DENVER,COLORADO 80202-2405
Ref: 8AT-AP 

### MAR2

### 1

### 1989

Mr. E. F. Glass Environmental/Regulatory Manager Mobil Exploration 

### &Producing

## u.s. Inc. P.O. Box 5444 Denver, Colorado 80217-5444 Dear Mr. Glass: This letter is in response to Mr. Greg Cresswell's January 25, 1989 letter which indicated that the height of the McElmo Creek Unit Gas Plant stacks has been increased from the height indicated in your Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit issued on October 27, 1987. We understand from Mr. Cresswell's letter that the height of the stacks is now approximately 40' feet, while your PSDpermit indicates a stack height of 20 feet. Since this change did not result in any emission increase or increased ambient impact, the changes to the permit shall be made administratively. This letter shall serve October 27, 1987 PSD permit, be considered to be 40 feet. effective immediately unless IV of the permit). as an amendment to**~able** 1 of the such that the stack height shall now

This amendment shall become

. you notify us otherwise (see Section
If youhave any questions, please contact Kris Knutson of my staff at (303) 293-1754. Sincerely,

# ~.ci'~ Irwin L. Dickstein, Director Air and Toxics Division
cc: Arlene Luther, Navajo Nation Burnell Cordner, Utah Bureau of Air Quality**.i~**
#### § 5.4 Regulatory scope.

The requirements in this part apply to all OpDivs and StaffDivs of HHS. Some OpDivs and StaffDivs may establish or continue to maintain additional rules because of unique program requirements, but such rules must be consistent with this part and the FOIA. If additional rules are issued, they must be published in the Federal Register and you may get copies online at *https://www.federalregister.gov/, http://www.regulations.gov/or* by contacting one of our FOIA Requester Service Centers.
Original,

No. 5671.

#### Leon P. LaBelle *v.*State.

Submitted June 29, 1967.

Decided July 18, 1967.

Per curiam.

It is not clear from the petition whether or not the complaints with reference to the 1944 conviction relate to the same matter considered in *LaBelle*v. *Hancock,*99 N. H. 254. If they do, the petition raises no new issues of fact and should be summarily disposed of. *Petition of Moebus,*74 N. H. 213; *Gobin*v. *Hancock,*96 N. H. 450; *LaBelle*v. *Hancock, supra.*

The allegations with reference to the 1961 conviction involve questions of fact which properly should be heard by the Superior Court. The concurrent original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in writs of habeas corpus is “exercised only sparingly and in exceptional cases. ” *Nelson*v. *Morse,*91 N. H. 177, 178; *LaBelle*v. *Hancock, supra.*This is not such a case.

The petition is, dismissed without prejudice to any proceeding which petitioner may initiate in the Superior Court.

*Petition dismissed.*
§ 75.373 Notification of termination requirement. ( a ) The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity must provide to the non-Federal entity a notice of termination.
( b ) If the Federal award is terminated for the non-Federal entity's material failure to comply with the Federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the Federal award, the notification must state that— ( 1 ) The termination decision will be reported to the OMB-designated integrity and performance system accessible through SAM (currently FAPIIS);
( 2 ) The information will be available in the OMB-designated integrity and performance system for a period of five years from the date of the termination, then archived;
( 3 ) HHS awarding agencies that consider making a Federal award to the non-Federal entity during that five year period must consider that information in judging whether the non-Federal entity is qualified to receive the Federal award, when the Federal share of the Federal award is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold over the period of performance;
( 4 ) The non-Federal entity may comment on any information the OMB-designated integrity and performance system contains about the non-Federal entity for future consideration by HHS awarding agencies. The non-Federal entity may submit comments to the awardee integrity and performance portal accessible through SAM (currently CPARS).
( 5 ) Federal awarding agencies will consider non-Federal entity comments when determining whether the non-Federal entity is qualified for a future Federal award.
( c ) Upon termination of a Federal award, the HHS awarding agency must provide the information required under FFATA to the Federal Web site established to fulfill the requirements of FFATA, and update or notify any other relevant government-wide systems or entities of any indications of poor performance as required by 41 U.S.C. 417b and 31 U.S.C. 3321 and implementing guidance at 2 CFR part 77 (forthcoming at time of publication). See also the requirements for Suspension and Debarment at 2 CFR part 180.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3017, Jan. 20, 2016]