Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 11287 

Subpart A—General 

§ 2867.137 Who in the Department of 

Justice may grant an exception to let an 

excluded person participate in a covered 

transaction? 

Within the Department of Justice, the 

Attorney General or designee has the 

authority to grant an exception to let an 

excluded person participate in a 

covered transaction, as provided in the 

OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135. 

Subpart B—Covered Transactions 

§ 2867.220 What contracts and 

subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 

2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions? 

Although the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 

180.220(c) allows a Federal agency to do 

so (also see optional lower tier coverage 

in the figure in the Appendix to 2 CFR 

part 180), the Department of Justice does 

not extend coverage of nonprocurement 

suspension and debarment requirements 

beyond first-tier procurement contracts 

under a covered nonprocurement 

transaction. 

Subpart C—Responsibilities of 

Participants Regarding Transactions 

§ 2867.332 What method must a 

participant use to pass requirements down 

to participants at lower tiers with whom the 

participant intends to do business? 

A participant must include a term or 

condition in lower-tier transactions 

requiring lower-tier participants to 

comply with Subpart C of the OMB 

guidance in 2 CFR part 180, as 

supplemented by this subpart. 

Subpart D—Responsibilities of Federal 

Agency Officials Regarding 

Transactions 

§ 2867.437 What method must be used to 

communicate to a participant the 

requirements described in the OMB 

guidance at 2 CFR 180.435? 

To communicate to a participant the 

requirements described in 2 CFR 

180.435 of the OMB guidance, the 

communication must include a term or 

condition in the transaction that 

requires the participant’s compliance 

with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as 

supplemented by Subpart C of this part, 

and requires the participant to include 

a similar term or condition in lower-tier 

covered transactions. 

Subparts E–J—[Reserved] 

Title 28—Judicial Administration 

CHAPTER 1—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

■ 2. Remove Part 67. 

Dated: March 6, 2007. 

Alberto R. Gonzales, 

Attorney General. 

[FR Doc. E7–4362 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–25945; Airspace 

Docket No. 06–ACE–15] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Alliance, NE 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This document confirms the 

effective date of the direct final rule 

which revises Class E airspace at 

Alliance, NE. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, May 

10, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT 

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 

(816) 329–2522. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

published this direct final rule with a 

request for comments in the Federal 

Register on January 11, 2007 (72 FR 

1279). The FAA uses the direct final 

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

May 10, 2007. No adverse comments 

were received, and thus this notice 

confirms that this direct final rule will 

become effective on that date. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on February 

20, 2007. 

Donald R. Smith, 

Manager, System Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Area. 

[FR Doc. 07–1161 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 385 

[Docket No. RM02–11–000] 

Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation 

Adjustment Rule: Order No. 692; Order 

Redesignating Proceeding 

Issued February 16, 2007. 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Final rule: order redesignating 

proceeding. 

SUMMARY: On August 5, 2002, the 

Commission issued a final rule for a 

Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation 

Adjustment as mandated by the Debt 

Collection Improvement Act of 1996. 

The final rule was designated ‘‘Order 

No. 890’’. The Commission is 

redesignating ‘‘Order No. 890’’ as 

‘‘Order No. 692’’. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 16, 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Secretary’s Office, Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

(202) 502–8400. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

5, 2002, the Commission issued ‘‘Order 

No. 890, Final Rule’’ in the abovecaptioned proceeding. Civil Monetary 

Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule, 100 

FERC ¶ 61,159 (2002). 

By this order the Commission 

redesignates the above-captioned 

proceeding as Order No. 692, Final 

Rule. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Nora E. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–4552 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

19 CFR Part 208 

Investigations Relating to Commercial 

Availability Under the African Growth 

and Opportunity Act 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Correcting amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Commission published a 

notice in the Federal Register on 

February 27, 2007 (72 FR 8624) 

amending its rules of practice and 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES