alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-413 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ALGERIA 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Algiers 

April 6 and 13, 2004 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ALGERIA 

 International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Algiers 

 April 6 and 13, 2004; 

 Entered into force April 13, 2004.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8161

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

STARKS FINCHER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (7:08-cr-01219-GRA-1)

Submitted: February 11, 2013 Decided: March 19, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starks Fincher, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Starks Fincher, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Fincher, No. 

7:08-cr-01219-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 13, 2012). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.9

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

 

TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

 

MID-CONTINENT DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

 

Mid-Continent Distributors, Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Arkansas, by its President and its Assistant Secretary, does hereby certify that:

 

A.            The name of the corporation is Mid-Continent Distributors, Inc.

 

B.            Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a copy of the Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation changing its name to Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc.

 

C.            The shareholders of the corporation adopted the Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation by an action pursuant to Section 64-220 of the Arkansas Business Corporation Act on May 10, 1985.

 

D.            The corporation presently has 2,000 shares outstanding and entitled to a vote.

 

E.            All 2,000 of the issued and outstanding shares of the corporation were cast in favor of the attached Amendment.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby ,verify that the statements contained in the foregoing Certificate of Amendment are true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief on this 10 day of May, 1985.

 

 

	
 
    	
/s/   David Bershof
    
	
 
    	
David   Bershof, President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   D. Charles Cornish
    
	
 
    	
D.   Charles Cornish
    
	
 
    	
Assistant   Secretary
    


 











 

EXHIBIT A

 

RESOLVED, that upon the recommendation of the Board of Directors of the corporation the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation shall be amended to amend Article 1 as follows:

 

1.             The name of this corporation is Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Iluiteb -'Qtate5 Court of Zipplat5

for tbe jfeberat Circuit

CAPTAIN ROSS E. JOSLYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-5080

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal

Claims in case no. 08-CV-925, Chief Judge Emily C.

Hewitt.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Captain Ross E. Joslyn moves for a 14-day extension

of time, until July 20, 2010, to file his opening brief.

Joslyn states that the United States consents.

On June 21, 2010, the day his brief was due, Joslyn

moved for an extension of time to file his brief. In that

motion, Joslyn stated that he sought a 60-day extension of
JOSLYN v. US 2

time; however, the revised due date that Joslyn requested

was July 6, 2010, only 15 days after the existing due date.

On June 28, 2010, the court granted Joslyn's motion for

an extension of time, until July 6, to file his brief. In the

order granting the extension of time, the court indicated

that no further extensions would be granted.

When the court states "no further extensions," it

means it. These words are not lightly or routinely added

to orders. Counsel for Joslyn fails to acknowledge in the

current motion that the court indicated that no further

extensions would be granted. In addition, the court notes

that Joslyn's motion was filed on July 6, the date his brief

was due. Because the motion was not filed at least seven

days before the date sought to be extended and is not

accompanied by an affidavit or declaration describing

extraordinary circumstances that prevented him from

filing a timely motion, it does not comply with Fed. Cir. R.

26(b). Joslyn's prior extension motion also failed to comply with Rule 26(b). Nevertheless, because it appears

that in his prior motion Joslyn attempted to seek a 60-day

extension of time, the court grants a short additional

extension of time.

Accordingly,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. Joslyn's brief is due within 14

days of the date of filing of this order. If the brief is not

filed within that time, the appeal will be dismissed. No

further extensions of time will be granted.
3 JOSLYN v. US

FOR THE COURT

JUL 2 8 2010

Date

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Michael D.J. Eisenberg, Esq.

James P. Connor, Esq.

s17

FID

U.S. cou R v

L

FAP EALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 2 8 Z010

JAN HORBALY

CLERK
#### § 681.12 What kind of hearing is contemplated?

The hearing is a formal proceeding conducted by the ALJ during which a defendant will have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, present testimony, and dispute liability.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael
Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                            
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: February 24, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan       
|                         |  | Michael Gilligan           
|                         |  | Principal Financial Officer
§ 607.8 Procedures for salary offset. ( a ) Deductions to liquidate an employee's debt will be by the method and in the amount stated in the Chief Financial Officer's notice of intention to offset as provided in § 607.4. Debts will be collected in one lump sum where possible. If the employee is financially unable to pay in one lump sum, collection must be made in installments.
( b ) Debts will be collected by deduction at officially established pay intervals from an employee's current pay account unless alternative arrangements for repayment are made.
( c ) Installment deductions will be made over a period not greater than the anticipated period of employment. The size of installment deductions must bear a reasonable relationship to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. The deduction for the pay intervals for any period must not exceed 15% of disposable pay unless the employee has agreed in writing to a deduction of a greater amount.
( d ) Unliquidated debts may be offset against any financial payment due to a separated employee including but not limited to final salary or leave payment in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3716.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

September 25, 2014 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 135 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Danita C. Alberico2)^jf 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on the South Dakota Democratic Party (LRA 885) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR") 

on the South Dakota Democratic Party. The DFAR contains four findings: (1) Misstatement of 

Financial Activity; (2) Recordkeeping for Employees; (3) Reporting of Coordinated Party 

Expenditures; (4) Contributions from Unregistered Political Organization; and (5) Disclosure of 

Occupation/Name of Employer. We concur with the findings. If you have any questions, please 

contact Danita C. Alberieo, the attorney assigned to this audit.
§ 60.11 Reporting negative actions or findings taken by peer review organizations or private accreditation entities. ( a ) *What actions must be reported.* Peer review organizations and private accreditation entities are required to report any negative actions or findings (as defined in § 60.3 of this part) which are taken against a health care practitioner, health care entity, provider, or supplier to the NPDB and provide a copy to the appropriate state licensing or certification agency. The health care practitioner, health care entity, provider, or supplier must be licensed or otherwise authorized by the state to provide health care services. The actions taken must be as a result of formal proceedings (as defined in § 60.3).
( b ) *What information must be reported.* Each peer review organization and private accreditation entity must report the information as required in § 60.9(b) of this part.
( c ) *What information may be reported, if known.* Each peer review organization and private accreditation entity should report, if known, the information as described in § 60.9(c).
( d ) *Access to documents.* Each peer review organization and private accreditation entity must provide the Secretary (or an entity designated by the Secretary) with access to the documents underlying the actions described in this section as may be necessary for the Secretary to determine the facts and circumstances concerning the actions and determinations for the purpose of carrying out section 1921.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.405 Research involving greater than minimal risk but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the individual subjects. HHS will conduct or fund research in which the IRB finds that more than minimal risk to children is presented by an intervention or procedure that holds out the prospect of direct benefit for the individual subject, or by a monitoring procedure that is likely to contribute to the subject's well-being, only if the IRB finds that: ( a ) The risk is justified by the anticipated benefit to the subjects;
( b ) The relation of the anticipated benefit to the risk is at least as favorable to the subjects as that presented by available alternative approaches; and
( c ) Adequate provisions are made for soliciting the assent of the children and permission of their parents or guardians, as set forth in § 46.408.
§ 702.4 Subpoenas. ( a ) Subpoenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses or the production of written or other matter may be issued by the Commission over the signature of the Chairperson and may be served by any person designated by the Chairperson.
( b ) A witness compelled to appear before the Commission or required to produce written or other matter shall be served with a copy of the rules in this part at the time of service of the subpoena.
( c ) The Commission may issue subpoenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses or for the production of written or other matter. Such a subpoena may not require the presence of a witness more than 100 miles outside the location wherein the witness is found or resides or is domiciled or transacts business or has appointed an agent for receipt of service of process.
( d ) The Chairperson shall receive and the Commission shall dispose of requests to subpoena additional witnesses except as otherwise provided in § 702.6(e).
( e ) Requests for subpoenas shall be in writing, supported by a showing of the general relevance and materiality of the evidence sought. Witness fees and mileage shall be computed and paid pursuant to § 702.15.
( f ) Subpoenas shall be issued at a reasonably sufficient time in advance of their scheduled return, in order to give subpoenaed persons an opportunity to prepare for their appearance and to employ counsel, should they so desire.
( g ) No subpoenaed document or information contained therein shall be made public unless it is introduced into and received as part of the official record of the hearing.
#### Luke Marvin, *Respondent, v.*Joseph Medbery, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Smith, J.;

Dwight, J., not sitting.
§ 400.107 Medical screening. ( a ) As part of its refugee medical assistance program, a State may provide a medical screening to a refugee provided— ( 1 ) The screening is in accordance with requirements prescribed by the Director, or his or her designee; and
( 2 ) Written approval for the screening program or project has been provided to the State by the Director, or designee.
( b ) If such screening is done during the first 90 days after a refugee's initial date of entry into the United States, it may be provided without prior determination of the refugee's eligibility under § 400.94 or § 400.100 of this part.
[54 FR 5480, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33603, June 28, 1995; 65 FR 15449, Mar. 22, 2000]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. 
**Title:****Shasta Lake boating safety: Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National RecreationArea, Shasta-Trinity National Forest, California
 
2020 | 2021
 
SuDoc Number: A 13.28:SH 2/14
Item Number: 0080-G(online)
CGP systemNumber: 000847938

 
March 26, 2024**
#### § 2556.145 May AmeriCorps pursue other remedies against a VISTA project for a sponsor's material failure to comply with any other requirement not set forth in this subpart?

The procedures established by this subpart do not preclude AmeriCorps from pursuing any other remedies authorized by law.
Exhibit 12.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Kuldip Kumar KauraName: Kuldip Kumar KauraTitle: Chief Executive Officer
§ 2551.25 What are a sponsor's administrative responsibilities? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70541 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
A sponsor shall: ( a ) Assume full responsibility for securing maximum and continuing community financial and in-kind support to operate the project successfully.
( b ) Provide levels of staffing and resources appropriate to accomplish the purposes of the project and carry out its project management responsibilities.
( c ) Employ a full-time project director to accomplish project objectives and manage the functions and activities delegate to project staff for Senior Corps project(s) within its control. The project director may participate in activities to coordinate project resources with those of related local agencies, boards or organizations. A full-time project director shall not serve concurrently in another capacity, paid or unpaid, during established working hours. A sponsor may negotiate the employment of a part-time project director with CNCS when the sponsor can demonstrate that such an arrangement will not adversely affect the size, scope, or quality of project operations.
( d ) Consider all project staff as sponsor employees subject to its personnel policies and procedures.
( e ) Compensate project staff at a level that is comparable to similar staff positions in the sponsor organization and/or project service area, as is practicable.
( f ) Establish risk management policies and procedures covering Senior Companion project activities. This includes provision of appropriate insurance coverage for Senior Companions, which includes; accident insurance, personal liability insurance, and excess automobile liability insurance.
( g ) Establish record keeping and reporting systems in compliance with CNCS requirements that ensure quality of program and fiscal operations, facilitate timely and accurate submission of required reports and cooperate with CNCS evaluation and data collection efforts.
( h ) Comply with, and ensure that all volunteer stations comply with, all applicable civil rights laws and regulations, including non-discrimination based on disability.
[64 FR 14115, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64645, Dec. 17, 2018]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1823 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve communication 

between the Secretary of Homeland Security and State and local law 

enforcement officials regarding the treatment of aliens who have been 

ordered removed and also charged with an aggravated felony under 

State law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2009 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve 

communication between the Secretary of Homeland Security and State and local law enforcement officials regarding the treatment of aliens who have been ordered removed and also charged with an aggravated felony under 

State law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1823 IH

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF ALIENS CHARGED WITH AGGRA2 VATED FELONY UNDER STATE LAW. 

3 Section 241(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(4)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) ALIENS CHARGED WITH AGGRAVATED

7 FELONY.—In the case of an alien charged with 

8 an aggravated felony under State law, the Sec9 retary of Homeland Security may, notwith10 standing paragraph (1), stay the removal of the 

11 alien pending disposition of the criminal charge 

12 if the chief law enforcement officer or executive 

13 of the State (or of a political subdivision of the 

14 State in which the criminal charge is brought), 

15 exercising authority with respect to public safe16 ty, submits a written request for such action to 

17 the Secretary. If the alien is sentenced to im18 prisonment on the charge, subparagraphs (A) 

19 and (B) shall apply.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS