alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID International Research in 
Infectious Disease (IRID) Program.
    Date: March 21-23, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Crown Plaza Hotel, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 
20910.
    Contact Person: Gary S. Madonna, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-3528, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f28227e7d380f21262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3a4aef2f1b483adaaabeda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Structural Genomics Centers 
for Infectious Disease.
    Date: March 26-27, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Darren D. Sledjeski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Scientific Review Program, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Room 3131, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 
451-2638, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#addec1c8c9c7c8dec6c4c9edc3c4ccc4c983c3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1829d94959b94829a9895b19f98909895df9f9899df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 27, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1024 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Prosper R. Ferrari, Appellant, *v.*Mary A. Racey, as Executrix of Robert H. Racey, Deceased, Respondent.

*Ferrari*v. *Baaey,*128 App. Div. 904, affirmed.

(Argued December 7, 1909;

decided January 4, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered'Octo*537ber 28, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to 'recover upon an .alleged agreement by defendant’s testator- to pay a certain sum of money for legal services.

*Charles E. Le Barbier*for appellant.

*George H. Francoeur*and *John J. Dwyer*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
#### § 410.1700 Purpose of this subpart.

This subpart sets forth the provisions for determining the age of an individual in ORR custody.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Thomas Krekeler, Appellant, *v.*Edmond J. Butler, as Commissioner of the Tenement House Department of the City of New York, Respondent.

*People ex'rel. Krelceler*v. *Butler,*129 App. "Div. 910, affirmed.

(Argued October 4, 1909;

decided October 19, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 24, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to approve certain plans and specifications.

*Ira J. Ettinger*and *William Hauser*for appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *(Corporation Coimsel (Theodore Connohj, John P. O’Brien*and *Samuel J. Parmenter*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Gerard, J., &¿ Special Term.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1560 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1560

   To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 
         discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2009

  Ms. Eshoo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 
         discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND 
              DISCRIMINATORY TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act 
(47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ``taxes during the period 
beginning November 1, 2003, and ending November 1, 2014:'' and 
inserting ``taxes:''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxes imposed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Harshaw Harvard-Denison Plant in Cleveland, Ohio, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On February 1, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Atomic Weapons employees who were monitored or should have been monitored while working at the Harshaw Harvard-Denison Plant located at 1000 Harvard Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio from August 14, 1942 through November 30, 1949, and who were employed for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure, Cohort.

                        This designation became effective on March 3, 2007, as provided for under 42                               ( print page 12618)                            U.S.C. 7384                        *l*                        (14)(C). Hence, beginning on March 3, 2007, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: March 12, 2007.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 07-1273 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

JOHN DOE 1 & JOHN DOE 2, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2694 (ABJ)

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 65, and for the reasons set forth in 

the accompanying memorandum opinion issued on this date, it is

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Federal Election Commission. 

This is a FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER.

 AMY BERMAN JACKSON

United States District Judge

DATE: March 23, 2018

Case 1:17-cv-02694-ABJ Document 46 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

Time and Date: March 15, 2007, 1 p.m. to 4:20 p.m., Eastern Daylight 
Time.

Place: This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested 
person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the 
toll free number and pass code needed to participate in this meeting by 
telephone.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board 
of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement. The 
Board may consider and adopt recommendations made to the Board by its 
Revenue and Fees Subcommittee to revise the fee scale that the Board 
originally recommended to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration and other matters that may properly come before the 
Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

    Dated: March 5, 2007.
John H. Hill,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 07-1086 Filed 3-5-07; 2:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1593 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1593 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

2 SEGMENTS. 

3 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(ll) ILLABOT CREEK, WASHINGTON.— 

7 ‘‘(A) The 14.3 mile segment from the 

8 headwaters of Illabot Creek to the northern ter9 minus as generally depicted on the map titled 

10 ‘Illabot Creek Proposed WSR – Northern Ter11 minus’, dated September 15, 2009, to be ad12 ministered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 

13 follows: 

14 ‘‘(i) The 4.3 mile segment from the 

15 headwaters of Illabot Creek to the bound16 ary of Glacier Peak Wilderness Area as a 

17 wild river. 

18 ‘‘(ii) The 10 mile segment from the 

19 boundary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to 

20 the northern terminus as generally de21 picted on the map titled ‘Illabot Creek 

22 Proposed WSR – Northern Terminus’, 

23 dated September 15, 2009, as a rec24 reational river. 

25 ‘‘(B) Action required to be taken under 

26 subsection (d)(1) for the river segments des-
3 

•HR 1593 EH

1 ignated under this paragraph shall be com2 pleted through revision of the Skagit Wild and 

3 Scenic River comprehensive management 

4 plan.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1593 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to destional Wild and Scenic Rivers System. County, Washington, as a component of the Na- ignate a segment of Illabot Creek in Skagit
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GARY E. JOHNSON; JAMES P. GRAY; 

and GARY JOHNSON 2012, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 8:12-cv-1626-ODW(JCx) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 

JURISDICTION 

The Court has received Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Plaintiffs filed a suit for 

declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant Federal Election Commission. In 

essence, Plaintiffs seek federal funding for the 2012 presidential election—the FEC 

denied Plaintiffs’ funding request on September 18, 2012. Upon review of the 

Complaint and applicable law, the Court questions whether it has subject-matter 

jurisdiction over this matter and hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs TO SHOW CAUSE and 

clearly articulate how this Court has jurisdiction.

 Under the Presidential Campaign Funding Act, a determination by the FEC is 

“subject to review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia.” 26 U.S.C. § 9011(a). This Court is not that court—and review by the 

D.C. Circuit is Plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy. Fed. Election Comm’n v. Reform Party 

of the U.S., 479 F.3d 1302, 1309 (11th Cir. 2007). 

But Plaintiffs assert an alternative theory of jurisdiction, claiming that they may 

bring an action “for declaratory judgment or injunctive relief” in this Court because 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 8:12-cv-01626-ODW-JC Document 10 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:90
 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

“[t]he district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of proceedings 

instituted pursuant to this subsection.” 26 U.S.C. § 9011(b). Yet, Plaintiffs’ position 

cannot be sustained under applicable law. FEC, 479 F.3d at 1308. The exclusive 

remedy for a plaintiff seeking redress from a FEC decision to deny campaign funding 

is to appeal to the D.C. Circuit within 30 days of the FEC’s denial. FEC, 479 F.3d at 

1308. 

Plaintiffs have 7 days to comply with this order and set forth reasons why this 

Court has subject-matter jurisdiction of this case in light of the discussion above. No 

hearing is scheduled for this order. If Plaintiffs fail to timely respond to this order, the 

case will be dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

October 4, 2012 

 ____________________________________ 

 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 8:12-cv-01626-ODW-JC Document 10 Filed 10/04/12 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:91
#### § 618.455 Textbooks and curricular material.

Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted as requiring or prohibiting or abridging in any way the use of particular textbooks or curricular materials.
mnittb ~tatt~ QCourt of ~ptal~ 

for tbt 

Jlistritt of QColumbia QCircuit 

GARY E. JOHNSON; JAMES P. GRAY) 

and GARY JOHNSON 2012, INC., ) 

) 

Petitioners ) 

) Case No. 12-1418 

vs. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________ ) 

,_ 

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR REVIEW 

0 r-:> 

·~:-? -n 

-·"1 t....;) 

C) 

l 'I --~' 

(~) 

C:J 

Now come Petitioners Gary E. Johnson, James P. Gray and Gary Johnson 

2012, Inc., by and through counsel and hereby move to dismiss without prejudice 

their petition filed in this case. In so moving, Petitioners do not intend that the 

dismissal constitute a retraxit. 

No Respondent has appeared in this matter which was only filed a few days 

ago, and accordingly, an order granting the motion will not adversely affect the 

interests of either Respondent, and would be in the best interest of justice. 

I 

' I 

' 

: 
Gary E. Johnson 

James P. Gray 

Gary Johnson 2012, Inc. 

280 South 400 West 

Suite 200 

Salt Lake City, UT 84101 

October 24, 2012 

Respectfully submitted, 

Paul Rolf Jensen*"' 

Counsel of Record 

J£.w-SEN & ASSOCIATES, APC, Trial Lawyers 

650 Town Center Drive, 121

h Floor 

Costa Mesa, California (714) 662-5538 

(714) 662-5528 

Counsel to Gary E. Johnson, James P. Gray and 

Gary Johnson 2012, Inc. 
Wniteb ~tate~ QCourt of ~peal~ 

for tbe 

mi~trirt of QColumbia QCirtuit 

GARY E. JOHNSON; JAMES P. GRAY) 

and GARY JOHNSON 2012, INC., ) 

) 

Petitioners ) 

) CaseNo.l2-1418 

vs. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

_________________________ ) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Paul Rolf Jensen, hereby certify that copies of the following document: 

Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review 

1 ...:l r· · 

has been served via t1rst-class mail, postage prepaid, this 241h day of October 2012, upon the 

following parties: 

Anthony Herman, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Federal Election Commission 

999 "E" Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20463 

The Hon. Eric Holder 

Attorney General 

U.S. Department of Justice 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001. 

i -'. 
Gary E. Johnson 

James P. Gray 

Gary Johnson 2012, Inc. 

280 South 400 West 

Suite 200 

Salt Lake City, UT 84101 

October 24, 2012 

I 

_/ 

. Paul Rolf JensetJ' 

Counsel of Record 

JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, APC, Trial Lawyers 

650 Town Center Drive, 12th Floor 

Costa Mesa, California (714) 662-5538 

(714) 662-5528 

Counsel to Gary E. Johnson, James P. Gray and 

Gary Johnson 2012, Inc.
§ 307.25 Review and certification of computerized support enforcement systems. The Office will review, assess and inspect the planning, design, development, installation, enhancement and operation of computerized support enforcement systems developed under § 307.10, or § 307.11 to determine the extent to which such systems: ( a ) Meet the requirements found in § 307.15; and
( b ) Can be certified as meeting the requirements described in § 307.10 and in the OCSE guideline entitled “Automated Systems for Child Support Enforcement: A Guide for States”.
[57 FR 47005, Oct. 14, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 44817, Aug. 21, 1998]
# Senate Floor Activity - Wednesday, March 5, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Wednesday, March  5)

S. 1086

S.Res. 373

S.Res. 374

## Executive Business (Wednesday, March  5)

PN1106

 57

PN1190

 51

 52

PN1191

 53

 54

PN1196

 49

 50

PN1199

 55

 56

PN1241

 48

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
§ 305.65 State cooperation in audit. ( a ) Each State shall make available to the Federal auditors such records or other supporting documentation (electronic and manual) as the audit staff may request, including records to support the data as submitted on the Federal statistical and financial reports that will be used to calculate the State's performance. The State shall also make available personnel associated with the State's IV-D program to provide information that the audit staff may find necessary in order to conduct or complete the audit.
( b ) States must provide evidence to Office that their data are complete and reliable as defined in § 305.1 of this part.
( c ) Failure to comply with the requirements of this section with respect to audits conducted to determine compliance with IV-D requirements under § 305.60 of this part, may necessitate a finding that the State has failed to comply with the particular criteria being audited.
[65 FR 82208, Dec. 27, 2000, as amended at 85 FR 35208, June 9, 2020]
Presidential Documents

1899 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 9 

Tuesday, January 16, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–7 of December 7, 2006 

Presidential Determination on Sanctions Against North Korea 

for Detonation of a Nuclear Explosive Device 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

In accordance with section 102(b) (1) of the Arms Export Control Act and 

section 129 of the Atomic Energy Act, I hereby determine that North Korea, 

a non-nuclear-weapon state, detonated a nuclear explosive device on October 

9, 2006. The relevant agencies and instrumentalities of the United States 

Government are hereby directed to take the necessary actions to impose 

on North Korea the sanctions described in section 102(b) (2) of the Arms 

Export Control Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2799aa–1), and section 129 

of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2158). 

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the appropriate committees of the Congress and to arrange for its publication in 

the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 7, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 07–133 

Filed 1–12–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>