alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Frank T. Matarazzo             |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |                               |
|   | Frank      T. Matarazzo,           |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|   | (principal      executive officer) |

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | /s/ Ownkar Persaud                 |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |                               |
|   | Ownkar      Persaud,               |
|   | Vice      President of Finance     |
|   | (principal      financial officer) |

----
§ 95.626 Independent Verification and Validation. ( a ) An assessment for independent verification and validation (IV&V) analysis of a State's system development effort may be required in the case of APD projects that meet any of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Are at risk of missing statutory or regulatory deadlines for automation that is intended to meet program requirements;
( 2 ) Are at risk of failing to meet a critical milestone;
( 3 ) Indicate the need for a new project or total system redesign;
( 4 ) Are developing systems under waivers pursuant to sections 452(d)(3) or 627 of the Social Security Act;
( 5 ) Are at risk of failure, major delay, or cost overrun in their systems development efforts;
( 6 ) Fail to timely and completely submit APD updates or other required systems documentation.
( 7 ) State's procurement policies put the project at risk, including a pattern of failing to pursue competition to the maximum extent feasible.
( 8 ) State's failure to adequately involve the State program offices in the development and implementation of the project.
( b ) Independent Verification and Validation efforts must be conducted by an entity that is independent from the State (unless the State receives an exception from the Department) and the entity selected must: ( 1 ) Develop a project workplan. The plan must be provided directly to the Department at the same time it is given to the State.
( 2 ) Review and make recommendations on both the management of the project, both State and vendor, and the technical aspects of the project. The IV&V provider must give the results of its analysis directly to the federal agencies that required the IV&V at the same time it reports to the State.
( 3 ) Consult with all stakeholders and assess the user involvement and buy-in regarding system functionality and the system's ability to support program business needs.
( 4 ) Conduct an analysis of past project performance sufficient to identify and make recommendations for improvement.
( 5 ) Provide risk management assessment and capacity planning services.
( 6 ) Develop performance metrics which allow tracking project completion against milestones set by the State.
( c ) The acquisition document and contract for selecting the IV&V provider (or similar documents if IV&V services are provided by other State agencies) must include requirements regarding the experience and skills of the key personnel proposed for the IV&V analysis. The contract (or similar document if the IV&V services are provided by other State agencies) must specify by name the key personnel who actually will work on the project. The acquisition documents and contract for required IV&V services must be submitted to the Department for prior written approval.
[75 FR 66340, Oct. 28, 2010]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum (ADRM) on the Los 

Angeles County Democratic Central 

Committee 

A09-07 

Agenda Document No. 12-42-A 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission 

open meeting on June 07,2012, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 

to approve Agenda Document No. 12-42-A, the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on the Los Angeles County Democratic Central Committee, subject to the appropriate 

amendments pursuant to the meetmg discussion to refiect the representations provided by the 

Committee during the Audit Hearing and in its letters regardmg fhe arrest of Kinde Durkee, tiie 

former treasurer. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Daiie ]5Iiawn Woodhead Werth T 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
GUESS?, INC
March 30, 2020


Kathryn Anderson


Re:    Temporary Reduction to Annual Base Salary


Dear Katie:
As you know, you are party to an offer letter with Guess?, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated October 23, 2019 (the “Offer Letter”), which provides for an annual base salary of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000) (the “Normal Base Salary”).  You and the Company have agreed that your annual rate of base salary from the Company will be reduced to Three Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand Dollars ($385,000) effective as of April 5, 2020 and continuing through such future date as may be agreed upon by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and the Executive or such earlier date you may cease to be employed by the Company, the “Expiration Date”).  Following the Expiration Date, your rate of annual base salary will automatically be restored to the rate of Normal Base Salary; provided, however, that you will not be entitled to any back pay for the period of time your base salary was reduced.  
If, on or prior to the Expiration Date, your employment is terminated under circumstances that would entitle you to severance payments pursuant to Sections 6 or 7 of your Offer Letter, your “base salary” for purposes of Sections 6 or 7, as applicable, shall be equal to your Normal Base Salary.  In addition, any bonus or equity award that you may be entitled to with respect to the period that your base salary is reduced will be determined with reference to your Normal Base Salary, as though the reduction in your base salary had not occurred.
You hereby agree that the reduction of your base salary provided for in this letter agreement will not constitute “Good Reason” within the meaning of your Offer Letter and will not constitute a breach of your Offer Letter.
Except for the changes to your base salary described in this letter agreement, the provisions of your Offer Letter shall continue in full force and effect.  This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Photographic copies of such signed counterparts may be used in lieu of the originals for any purpose.
We appreciate your dedication to the Company.
GUESS?, INC.


/s/ Carlos Alberini                                                                         
By: Carlos Alberini
Title: CEO 
Acknowledged and Agreed:
By:    /s/Kathryn Anderson                                                                   
Kathryn Anderson
Date:    March 30, 2020
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 212 (Thursday, November 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 66084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26835]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Tenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable 
Lithium Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
tenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 27-29, 2012, from 9:00 a.m.-
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Boeing Facility, 95-82 
Building, 1200 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209. The Boeing 
Facility is located across the street from the Rosslyn Metro station.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0662/(202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 225. The agenda will 
include the following:

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

     Introductions and administrative items.
     Review agenda.
     Review and approval of summary from last Plenary meeting.
     Review schedule for upcoming Plenaries, working group 
meetings, and document preparation.
     Review action items.
     Create a name/acronym for electronic equipment that is 
part of the type design but also portable.
     Working Group meeting.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

     Review agenda, other actions.
     Working Group meeting.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

     Review agenda, other actions.
     Verify dates of next Plenary and upcoming Working Group 
meetings.
     Establish agenda for next Plenary meeting.
     Working Group meeting.
     Working Group report, review progress and actions.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2012.
Richard F. Gonzalez,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-26835 Filed 10-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1823

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve communication 
  between the Secretary of Homeland Security and State and local law 
 enforcement officials regarding the treatment of aliens who have been 
ordered removed and also charged with an aggravated felony under State 
                                  law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2009

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve communication 
  between the Secretary of Homeland Security and State and local law 
 enforcement officials regarding the treatment of aliens who have been 
ordered removed and also charged with an aggravated felony under State 
                                  law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF ALIENS CHARGED WITH AGGRAVATED FELONY UNDER STATE 
              LAW.

    Section 241(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1231(a)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) Aliens charged with aggravated felony.--In 
                the case of an alien charged with an aggravated felony 
                under State law, the Secretary of Homeland Security 
                may, notwithstanding paragraph (1), stay the removal of 
                the alien pending disposition of the criminal charge if 
                the chief law enforcement officer or executive of the 
                State (or of a political subdivision of the State in 
                which the criminal charge is brought), exercising 
                authority with respect to public safety, submits a 
                written request for such action to the Secretary. If 
                the alien is sentenced to imprisonment on the charge, 
                subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall apply.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2400.60 Renewal of award. ( a ) Provided that Fellows have submitted all required documentation and are making satisfactory academic progress, it is the intent of the Foundation to renew Junior Fellowship awards annually for a period not to exceed two calendar years or the completion of their graduate degrees, whichever comes first, and Senior Fellowships for a period not to exceed 5 calendar years (except when those periods have been altered because of changes in Fellows' Plan of Study as provided for in § 2400.64), or until a Fellow has completed all requirements for a master's degree, whichever comes first. In no case, however, will the Foundation continue payments under a fellowship to a Fellow who has reached the maximum payments under a fellowship as indicated in § 2400.52, or completed the minimum number of credits required for the degree. Although Fellows are not discouraged in taking courses in addition to those required for the degree or required to maintain full-time status, the Foundation will not in such cases pay for those additional courses.
( b ) Fellowship renewal will be subject to an annual review by the Foundation and certification by an authorized official of the university at which a Fellow is registered that the Fellow is making satisfactory progress toward the degree and is in good academic standing according to the standards of each university.
( c ) As a condition of renewal of awards, each Fellow must submit an annual activity report to the Foundation by July 15th. That report must indicate, through submission of a copy of the Fellow's most recent transcript, courses taken and grades achieved; courses planned for the coming year; changes in academic or professional plans or situations; any awards, recognitions, or special achievements in the Fellow's academic study or school employment; and such other information as may relate to the fellowship and its holder.
[61 FR 46734, Sept. 5, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 11815, Mar. 12, 2004]
§ 75.520 Criteria for a low-risk auditee. An auditee that meets all of the following conditions for each of the preceding two audit periods must qualify as a low-risk auditee and be eligible for reduced audit coverage in accordance with § 75.518. ( a ) Single audits were performed on an annual basis in accordance with the provisions of this subpart, including submitting the data collection form and the reporting package to the FAC within the timeframe specified in § 75.512 . A non-Federal entity that has biennial audits does not qualify as a low-risk auditee.
( b ) The auditor's opinion on whether the financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP, or a basis of accounting required by state law, and the auditor's in relation to opinion on the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards were unmodified.
( c ) There were no deficiencies in internal control which were identified as material weaknesses under the requirements of GAGAS.
( d ) The auditor did not report a substantial doubt about the auditee's ability to continue as a going concern.
( e ) None of the Federal programs had audit findings from any of the following in either of the preceding two audit periods in which they were classified as Type A programs: ( 1 ) Internal control deficiencies that were identified as material weaknesses in the auditor's report on internal control for major programs as required under § 75.515(c);
( 2 ) A modified opinion on a major program in the auditor's report on major programs as required under § 75.515(c); or
( 3 ) Known or likely questioned costs that exceeded five percent of the total Federal awards expended for a Type A program during the audit period.
**Exhibit 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153207 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-150067 and333-185350 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 27, 2015, relating to the financial statements of Amboy Aggregates Joint Venture and Subsidiaries and Lower Main Street Development, LLC (A Limited Liability Company), appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

/s/ WithumSmith+Brown. PC 

New Brunswick, NJ 

March 27, 2015
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Robert L. Thast, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Nova Mining Corporation (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                     

| | By:    | /s/ Robert L. Thast        
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | ROBERT L. THAST            
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | June 13, 2008              

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accredo Health, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David D. Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ David D. Stevens

David D. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2005
#### § 400.311 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

“Targeted assistance grants” means formula allocation funding to States for assistance to counties and similar areas in the States where, because of factors such as unusually large refugee populations (including secondary migration), high refugee concentrations, and high use of public assistance by refugees, there exists and can be demonstrated a specific need for supplementation of available resources for services to refugees.
§ 79.32 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held— ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the defendant resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement in issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party shall have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing shall be held at the place and at the time ordered by the ALJ.
§ 30.24 Joint and several liability. ( a ) When two or more debtors are jointly and severally liable, the Secretary will pursue collection against all debtors, as appropriate. The Secretary will not attempt to allocate the burden of payment between the debtors but will proceed to liquidate the indebtedness as quickly as possible.
( b ) The Secretary will ensure that a compromise agreement with one debtor does not automatically release the Department's claim against the remaining debtor(s). The amount of a compromise with one debtor shall not be considered a precedent or binding in determining the amount that will be required from other debtors jointly and severally liable on the claim.