alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 23 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 61
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 23

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
 Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
                    Designating Critical Habitat''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

  Ms. Lummis (for herself, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. 
Ricketts, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Budd, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Risch, 
   Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Daines, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
Hoeven, Mr. Cruz, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Cassidy, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. Wicker) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

                              May 10, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
 Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
                    Designating Critical Habitat''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to 
``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical 
Habitat'' (87 Fed. Reg. 37757 (June 24, 2022)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

                                                        Calendar No. 61

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 23

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
 Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and 
                    Designating Critical Habitat''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 10, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )
) Al7-19
Proposed Final Audit Report on the )
Oklahoma Democratic Party )
CERTIFICATION

I, Laura E. Sinram, Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election
Commission, do hereby certify that on July 05, 2019, the Commission decided
by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the Oklahoma
Democratic Party, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief
Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated July 2, 2019.

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted

affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:
wiki Che awa ©. Cinraad
Date Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the
Commission
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7589

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP G. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CA-98-39-3)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Brown appeals from the district court’s order denying

relief on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994).

Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, No.

CA-98-39-3 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 13, 1998). See also Pelissero v.

Thompson, ___ F.3d ___, No. 97-6156 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 12478 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1973 

RONAN STATE BANK, 

a Montana Corporation, 

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

-VS - 

MARY M. JEWETT, formerly MARY M. SHEPHARD, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

Appeal from: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District. 

Hon. E. Gardner Brownlee, Judge presiding. 

Counsel of Record: 

For Appellant : 

Richard Heinz argued, Polson, Montana 

For Respondent : 

Christiansen, McCurdy, Ingraham & Wold, Polson, 

Montana 

Frank L. Ingraham argued, Polson, Montana 

Submitted: May 31, 1973 

Decided : JUN 2 0 i j:J 
Mr. Justice John Conway Harrison delivered the Opinion of the 

Court, 

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of 

the fourth judicial district, county of Lake, Hon. E. Gardner 

Brownlee, judge presiding, granting a default judgment against 

an enrolled Indian, Mary M. Jewett. 

This is a companion case to Security State Bank v. Pierre, 

Cause No. 8155, Lake County, which because of the similar fact 

situation was consolidated for hearing purposes at the time 

Judge Brownlee heard Pierre. At the time set for hearing Pierre 

in this Court in December 1972, counsel for appellant Jewett 

appeared and argued although no appeal had been taken by Jewett 

following Judge Brownlee's order granting a default judgment 

against her, 

On February 7, 1973, this Court issued an opinion in the 

case of Security State Bank v, Pierre, reversing the order of the 

district court in Pierre. Due to a factual error concerning the 

appellate status of the instant case discovered after the remittitur had gone down in Pierre, the Court recalled the remittitur 

and set both cases for rehearing, After the recall order had 

issued, both respondent State Bank of Ronan and appellant &ry 

M. Jewett filed with this Court a stipulation expressly waiving 

any defects in the failure to file the notice of appeal and in 

the perfection of such appeal in the instant case. It was revealed 

that in the instant case Ronan State Bank had first attempted 

to bring its action in the Flathead Tribal Court, but appellant 

Jewett refused to permit the action. The action was then brought 

in the district court. In this Court's original opinion in Pierre 

it had been assumed that the parties had not attempted to bring 

action in the Tribal Court. Since that time the Tribal Law and 

Order Code has been amended to allow such actions in Tribal Court. 
On March 19, 1973, the clerk of this Court received a notice 

oi appeal, dated March 16, 1973, from counsel for appellant Jewett. 

Both cases, Pierre and Jewett, were reargued by counsel on 

my 31, 1973. In the instant case, it is now fully established 

and admitted by appellant's counsel that no timely appeal was 

taken by appellant Jewett, 

There being no appeal before this Court, the cause is 

dismissed. n 

Associate Justices 4 

1 \. Ic Ill- (C { tI.?,.L.-" ............................... Hon. Bernard Thomas, District 

Judge, sitting for Justice 

Wesley Castles.
#### Fisher v. Banta.

*Reference—to compute amount due—order directing referee to carry out Ms decision erroneous.*

In an action brought by legatees for the construction of a will and for the payment of their legacies, the court, in the order for judgment, appointed a referee to inquire into and compute the amount of the estate, the moneys paid on the legacies and the amount due to the legatees on account thereof. The order further directed certain of the parties to pay over such assets of the estate as might be in their hands, and the referee to pay out the moneys received, to satisfy the legacies. *Held,*that so much of the order as made the referee receiver, with authority to carry out his decision, was not proper.

Motios for a new trial upon exceptions taken to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of ■ the court in an action tried at *692special term. The action was brought in Erie county by Philena B. Eisher and others, against George Hubbell and others, among whom were the defendant Stanley A. Banta, to obtain the construction of two wills. The case, on- a former hearing before the general term, is reported *sub mm. Fisher*v. *Hubbell,*in 1 N. Y. Sup. at page 97.

_ *W. W. Rowley*and *De L. Crittenden,*for plaintiffs.

*Morse & Wells,*for defendants.

E. Darwih Smith, J.

The head-note states fully the only point passed upon in the opinion.

*Order for judgment modified.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      of**


**Chief
      Executive Officer**


**of
      Buckeye Ventures, Inc. Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




This
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-KSB
      (the “Form 10-KSB”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, of Buckeye
      Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Alan J. Mintz, the Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Form
      10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB
      pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
      of
      the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
      registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.




Date:
                April 15, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Alan J. MintzAlan J. MintzPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 2795.

#### John Lawhon *v.*The State.

Local Option Law—Amendment—Casks Approved.—The act of March 30, 1887, amendatory of the general local option law, is operative only in those communities wherein the local option law has been adopted since it went into effect, and can not affeet those communities wherein the general local option law was previously in operation. (Dawson’s case, 25 Texas Ct. App., 670. and Robinson’s case, 26 Texas Ct. App., 82, approved on this question.)

Appeal from the County Court of Cherokee. Tried below before the Hon. M. J. Whitman, County Judge.

This conviction was for a violation of the local option law, and the penalty assessed was a fine of twenty-five dollars.

The ruling of the court involves no question of fact.

No brief for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

This conviction is for violating the local ■option law. The indictment was filed on January 13, 1888, and it alleged that the offense was committed December 28, 1887. The local option law was adopted by the voters of the precinct ■at an election held in March, 1886.

The court below, trying the case without a jury, assessed the punishment under the provisions of the act of the Legislature, *102approved March 30, 1887, amending the local option law and making the punishment more onerous. This was error.

Opinion delivered October 10, 1888.

In the case of Robinson v. The State, ante, 82, this court held that, when the people of a certain locality have adopted the local option law at an election held before the amendment was^ enacted, such amendment does not affect the law as it existed in such locality prior to the amendment. The amendment will only operate in such localities as since its passage may, by election, adopt its provisions. (Dawson v. The State, 25 Texas Ct. App., 670.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for trial under the old law.

*Reversed and remanded,*
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 06, 2007

Greenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, CT 06830

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-8

Per Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 8/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
     Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, in
     all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there
     has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
     specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and
     status thereof.




Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers
Barry Akers
Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Assistant Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - [Docket No. FAA-2007-23639] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces May 1, 2007, as the deadline for each airport sponsor to notify the FAA that it will use its fiscal year 2007 entitlement funds to accomplish projects identified in the Airports Capital Improvement Plan that was formulated in the spring of 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Barry Molar, Manager, Airports Financial Assistance Division, Office of Airport Planning and Programming, APP-500, on (202) 267-3831. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 47105(f) of Title 49, United States Code, provides that the sponsor of each airport to which funds are apportioned shall notify the Secretary by such time and in a form as prescribed by the Secretary, of the sponsor's intent to apply for the funds apportioned to it (entitlements). This notice applies only to those airports that have had entitlement funds apportioned to them, except those nonprimary airports located in designated Block Grant States. Notification of the sponsor's intent to apply during fiscal year 2007 for any of its available entitlement funds including those unused from prior years, shall be in the form of inclusion of projects for fiscal year 2007 in the Airports Capital Improvement Plan. 

This notice is promulgated to expedite and prioritize grants in the final quarter of the fiscal year. Absent an acceptable application by May 1, 2007, FAA will defer an airport's entitlement funds until the next fiscal year. Pursuant to the authority and limitations in section 47117(f), FAA will issue discretionary grants in an aggregate amount not to exceed the aggregate amount of deferred entitlement funds. Airport sponsors may request unused entitlements after September 30, 2007 as provided in the law. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 8, 2007. 

Barry L. Molar, 

Manager, Airports Financial Assistance Division. 

[FR Doc. 07-1017 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Mechanisms of Immune 
Modulation.
    Date: March 22-23, 2007.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hills Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Martina Schmidt, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for 
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3456, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff8c9c9792969b929ebf929e9693d1919697d1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4330202b2e2a272e22032e222a2f6d2d2a2b6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1039 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 84.31 Application of this subpart.

This subpart applies to childcare, preschool, elementary and secondary, and adult education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.

[89 FR 40187, May 9, 2024]
# CE2009286EN.01008202.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/82

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008Environmental quality standards in the field of water policy ***II

P6_TA(2008)0283

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 June 2008 on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and 2000/60/EC (11486/3/2007 — C6-0055/2008 — 2006/0129(COD))

2009/C 286 E/35

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (1) (11486/3/2007 — C6-0055/2008),

1

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0397),

2

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0192/2008),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 E, 18.3.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 102 E, 24.4.2008, p. 90.

2

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008P6_TC2-COD(2006)0129

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 17 June 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2008/105/EC.)

---
#### § 1175.101 Purpose.

This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
§ 670.6 Prior possession exception. ( a ) *Exception.* Section 670.4 shall not apply to: ( 1 ) Any native mammal, bird, plant or invertebrate which is held in captivity on or before October 28, 1978; or
( 2 ) Any offspring of such mammal, bird, plant or invertebrate.
( b ) *Presumption.* With respect to any prohibited act set forth in § 670.4 which occurs after April 29, 1979, the Act creates a rebuttable presumption that the native mammal, bird, plant or invertebrate involved in such act was not held in captivity on or before October 28, 1978, or was not an offspring referred to in paragraph (a) of this section.
[86 FR 27987, May 25, 2021]