# CE2008190EN.01000101.xml

| 29.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 190/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 190/1

---

COMMON POSITION (EC) No 18/2008

COMMON POSITION

adopted by the Council on 6 June 2008

with a view to adopting Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations (Recast)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 190 E/01)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),

1

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (2),

2

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty (3),

3

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (4) has been significantly amended on several occasions. Since further amendments are to be made, it should be recast in the interests of clarity. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (4) has been significantly amended on several occasions. Since further amendments are to be made, it should be recast in the interests of clarity.

4

| (2) | In view of the nature of the provisions of Directive 94/57/EC it seems appropriate that its provisions be recast in two different Community legal instruments, namely a Directive and a Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the nature of the provisions of Directive 94/57/EC it seems appropriate that its provisions be recast in two different Community legal instruments, namely a Directive and a Regulation.

| (3) | This Regulation is to be understood and interpreted in conformity with the Community's international obligations, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Regulation is to be understood and interpreted in conformity with the Community's international obligations, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982.

| (4) | Ship inspection and survey organisations should be able to offer their services throughout the Community and compete with each other while providing equal levels of safety and of environmental protection. The necessary professional standards for their activities should therefore be uniformly established and applied across the Community. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Ship inspection and survey organisations should be able to offer their services throughout the Community and compete with each other while providing equal levels of safety and of environmental protection. The necessary professional standards for their activities should therefore be uniformly established and applied across the Community.

| (5) | This objective should be pursued through measures that adequately tie in with the work of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and, where appropriate, build on and complement it. Furthermore, the Member States and the Commission should promote the development by the IMO of an international code for recognised organisations. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

This objective should be pursued through measures that adequately tie in with the work of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and, where appropriate, build on and complement it. Furthermore, the Member States and the Commission should promote the development by the IMO of an international code for recognised organisations.

| (6) | Minimum criteria for recognition of organisations should be laid down with a view to enhancing the safety of, and preventing pollution from, ships. The minimum criteria laid down in Directive 94/57/EC should therefore be strengthened. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Minimum criteria for recognition of organisations should be laid down with a view to enhancing the safety of, and preventing pollution from, ships. The minimum criteria laid down in Directive 94/57/EC should therefore be strengthened.

| (7) | In order to grant initial recognition to the organisations wishing to be authorised to work on behalf of the Member States, compliance with the minimum criteria laid down in this Regulation could be assessed more effectively in a harmonised and centralised manner by the Commission together with the Member States requesting the recognition. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In order to grant initial recognition to the organisations wishing to be authorised to work on behalf of the Member States, compliance with the minimum criteria laid down in this Regulation could be assessed more effectively in a harmonised and centralised manner by the Commission together with the Member States requesting the recognition.

| (8) | Recognition should be granted only on the basis of the quality and safety performance of the organisation. It should be ensured that the extent of that recognition be at all times in keeping with the actual capacity of the organisation concerned. Recognition should furthermore take into account the differences in legal status and corporate structure of recognised organisations while continuing to ensure uniform application of the minimum criteria laid down in this Regulation and the effectiveness of the Community controls. Regardless of the corporate structure, the organisation to be recognised should provide services worldwide and be subject to global joint and several liability. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Recognition should be granted only on the basis of the quality and safety performance of the organisation. It should be ensured that the extent of that recognition be at all times in keeping with the actual capacity of the organisation concerned. Recognition should furthermore take into account the differences in legal status and corporate structure of recognised organisations while continuing to ensure uniform application of the minimum criteria laid down in this Regulation and the effectiveness of the Community controls. Regardless of the corporate structure, the organisation to be recognised should provide services worldwide and be subject to global joint and several liability.

| (9) | The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (5). |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (5).

5

| (10) | In particular, the Commission should be empowered to amend this Regulation in order to incorporate subsequent amendments to the international conventions, protocols, codes and resolutions related thereto, to update the minimum criteria in Annex I and to adopt the criteria to measure the effectiveness of the rules and procedures as well as the performance of the recognised organisations as regards the safety of, and the prevention of pollution from, their classed ships. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, inter alia by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In particular, the Commission should be empowered to amend this Regulation in order to incorporate subsequent amendments to the international conventions, protocols, codes and resolutions related thereto, to update the minimum criteria in Annex I and to adopt the criteria to measure the effectiveness of the rules and procedures as well as the performance of the recognised organisations as regards the safety of, and the prevention of pollution from, their classed ships. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, inter alia by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.

| (11) | It is of the utmost importance that failure by a recognised organisation to fulfil its obligations can be addressed in a prompt, effective and proportionate manner. The primary objective should be to correct any deficiencies with a view to removing any potential threat to safety or the environment at an early stage. The Commission should therefore be given the necessary powers to require that the recognised organisation undertake the necessary preventive and remedial action, and to impose fines and periodic penalty payments as coercive measures. When exercising these powers, the Commission should do so in a manner that complies with fundamental rights and should ensure that the organisation can make its views known throughout the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

It is of the utmost importance that failure by a recognised organisation to fulfil its obligations can be addressed in a prompt, effective and proportionate manner. The primary objective should be to correct any deficiencies with a view to removing any potential threat to safety or the environment at an early stage. The Commission should therefore be given the necessary powers to require that the recognised organisation undertake the necessary preventive and remedial action, and to impose fines and periodic penalty payments as coercive measures. When exercising these powers, the Commission should do so in a manner that complies with fundamental rights and should ensure that the organisation can make its views known throughout the procedure.

| (12) | In accordance with the Community-wide approach, the decision to withdraw the recognition of an organisation which fails to fulfil the obligations set out in this Regulation if the above measures prove ineffective or the organisation otherwise presents an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment, has to be taken at Community level, and therefore by the Commission, on the basis of a committee procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

In accordance with the Community-wide approach, the decision to withdraw the recognition of an organisation which fails to fulfil the obligations set out in this Regulation if the above measures prove ineffective or the organisation otherwise presents an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment, has to be taken at Community level, and therefore by the Commission, on the basis of a committee procedure.

| (13) | The continuous a posteriori monitoring of the recognised organisations to assess their compliance with this Regulation can be carried out more effectively in a harmonised and centralised manner. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Commission, together with the Member State requesting the recognition, be entrusted with this task on behalf of the Community. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The continuous a posteriori monitoring of the recognised organisations to assess their compliance with this Regulation can be carried out more effectively in a harmonised and centralised manner. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Commission, together with the Member State requesting the recognition, be entrusted with this task on behalf of the Community.

| (14) | As part of the monitoring of the operations of recognised organisations, it is crucial that Commission inspectors have access to ships and ship files regardless of the ship's flag in order to ascertain whether the recognised organisations are complying with the minimum criteria laid down in this Regulation in respect of all ships in their respective classes. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

As part of the monitoring of the operations of recognised organisations, it is crucial that Commission inspectors have access to ships and ship files regardless of the ship's flag in order to ascertain whether the recognised organisations are complying with the minimum criteria laid down in this Regulation in respect of all ships in their respective classes.

| (15) | The ability of recognised organisations to identify rapidly and correct weaknesses in their rules, processes and internal controls is critical for the safety of the ships they inspect and certify. That ability should be enhanced by means of a Quality Assessment and Certification System, which should be independent of commercial or political interests in order to propose common action for the sustained improvement of all recognised organisations and ensure fruitful cooperation with the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

The ability of recognised organisations to identify rapidly and correct weaknesses in their rules, processes and internal controls is critical for the safety of the ships they inspect and certify. That ability should be enhanced by means of a Quality Assessment and Certification System, which should be independent of commercial or political interests in order to propose common action for the sustained improvement of all recognised organisations and ensure fruitful cooperation with the Commission.

| (16) | The rules and procedures of recognised organisations are a key factor for increasing safety and preventing accidents and pollution. The recognised organisations have initiated a process that should lead to harmonisation of their rules and procedures. That process should be encouraged and supported by Community legislation, as it should have a positive impact on maritime safety as well as on the competitiveness of the European shipbuilding industry. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

The rules and procedures of recognised organisations are a key factor for increasing safety and preventing accidents and pollution. The recognised organisations have initiated a process that should lead to harmonisation of their rules and procedures. That process should be encouraged and supported by Community legislation, as it should have a positive impact on maritime safety as well as on the competitiveness of the European shipbuilding industry.

| (17) | The harmonisation of the rules of recognised organisations for the design, construction and periodic survey of merchant ships is an ongoing process. Therefore, the obligation to have a set of own rules or the demonstrated ability to have own rules should be seen in the context of the process of harmonisation and should not constitute an obstacle to the activities of recognised organisations or potential candidates for recognition. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The harmonisation of the rules of recognised organisations for the design, construction and periodic survey of merchant ships is an ongoing process. Therefore, the obligation to have a set of own rules or the demonstrated ability to have own rules should be seen in the context of the process of harmonisation and should not constitute an obstacle to the activities of recognised organisations or potential candidates for recognition.

| (18) | Recognised organisations should be obliged to update their technical standards and enforce them consistently in order to harmonise safety rules and ensure uniform implementation of international rules within the Community. Where the technical standards of recognised organisations are identical or very similar, mutual recognition of certificates for materials, equipment and components should be considered in appropriate cases, taking the most demanding and rigorous standard as the reference. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

Recognised organisations should be obliged to update their technical standards and enforce them consistently in order to harmonise safety rules and ensure uniform implementation of international rules within the Community. Where the technical standards of recognised organisations are identical or very similar, mutual recognition of certificates for materials, equipment and components should be considered in appropriate cases, taking the most demanding and rigorous standard as the reference.

| (19) | While each recognised organisation, in principle, should be held responsible solely and exclusively in relation to the parts it certifies, the liability of recognised organisations and manufacturers will follow the agreed conditions or, as the case may be, the applicable law in each individual case. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

While each recognised organisation, in principle, should be held responsible solely and exclusively in relation to the parts it certifies, the liability of recognised organisations and manufacturers will follow the agreed conditions or, as the case may be, the applicable law in each individual case.

| (20) | Since transparency and exchange of information between interested parties, as well as public right of access to information, are fundamental tools for preventing accidents at sea, recognised organisations should provide all relevant statutory information concerning the conditions of the ships in their class to the port State control authorities and make it available to the general public. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

Since transparency and exchange of information between interested parties, as well as public right of access to information, are fundamental tools for preventing accidents at sea, recognised organisations should provide all relevant statutory information concerning the conditions of the ships in their class to the port State control authorities and make it available to the general public.

| (21) | In order to prevent ships from changing class to avoid carrying out necessary repairs, recognised organisations should exchange all relevant information among themselves concerning the conditions of ships changing class and involve the flag State when necessary. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

In order to prevent ships from changing class to avoid carrying out necessary repairs, recognised organisations should exchange all relevant information among themselves concerning the conditions of ships changing class and involve the flag State when necessary.

| (22) | The protection of intellectual property rights of shipyards, equipment suppliers and shipowners should not prevent normal business transactions and contractually agreed services between these parties. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The protection of intellectual property rights of shipyards, equipment suppliers and shipowners should not prevent normal business transactions and contractually agreed services between these parties.

| (23) | The European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 (6) should provide the necessary support to ensure the application of this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

The European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 (6) should provide the necessary support to ensure the application of this Regulation.

6

| (24) | Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the establishment of measures to be followed by organisations entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships, operating in the Community, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the establishment of measures to be followed by organisations entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships, operating in the Community, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.

| (25) | Measures to be followed by the Member States in their relationship with ship inspection and survey organisations are laid down in Directive .../.../EC of the European Parliament and the Council of ... on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (7), |
| --- | --- |

(25)

Measures to be followed by the Member States in their relationship with ship inspection and survey organisations are laid down in Directive .../.../EC of the European Parliament and the Council of ... on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (7),

7

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

This Regulation establishes measures to be followed by organisations entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships for compliance with the international conventions on safety at sea and prevention of marine pollution, while furthering the objective of freedom to provide services. This includes the development and implementation of safety requirements for hull, machinery and electrical and control installations of ships falling under the scope of the international conventions.

Article 2

For the purpose of this Regulation the following definitions shall apply:

| (a) | ‘ship’ | means a ship falling within the scope of the international conventions; |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (b) | ‘international conventions’ | means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974 (SOLAS 74) with the exception of chapter XI-2 of the Annex thereto, the International Convention of Load Lines of 5 April 1966 and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (MARPOL), together with the protocols and amendments thereto, and the related codes of mandatory status in all Member States, in their up-to-date version; |
| (c) | ‘organisation’ | means a legal entity, its subsidiaries and any other entities under its control, which jointly or separately carry out tasks falling under the scope of this Regulation; |
| (d) | ‘control’ | means, for the purpose of point (c), rights, contracts or any other means, in law or in fact, which, either separately or in combination confer the possibility of exercising decisive influence on a legal entity or enable that entity to carry out tasks falling under the scope of this Regulation; |
| (e) | ‘recognised organisation’ | means an organisation recognised in accordance with this Regulation; |
| (f) | ‘authorisation’ | means an act whereby a Member State grants an authorisation or delegates powers to a recognised organisation; |
| (g) | ‘statutory certificate’ | means a certificate issued by or on behalf of a flag State in accordance with the international conventions; |
| (h) | ‘rules and procedures’ | means a recognised organisation's requirements for the design, construction, equipment, maintenance and survey of ships; |
| (i) | ‘class certificate’ | means a document issued by a recognised organisation certifying the fitness of a ship for a particular use or service in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down and made public by that recognised organisation; |
| (j) | ‘location’ | means the place of the registered office, central administration or principal place of business of an organisation. |

(a)

‘ship’

means a ship falling within the scope of the international conventions;

(b)

‘international conventions’

means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974 (SOLAS 74) with the exception of chapter XI-2 of the Annex thereto, the International Convention of Load Lines of 5 April 1966 and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (MARPOL), together with the protocols and amendments thereto, and the related codes of mandatory status in all Member States, in their up-to-date version;

(c)

‘organisation’

means a legal entity, its subsidiaries and any other entities under its control, which jointly or separately carry out tasks falling under the scope of this Regulation;

(d)

‘control’

means, for the purpose of point (c), rights, contracts or any other means, in law or in fact, which, either separately or in combination confer the possibility of exercising decisive influence on a legal entity or enable that entity to carry out tasks falling under the scope of this Regulation;

(e)

‘recognised organisation’

means an organisation recognised in accordance with this Regulation;

(f)

‘authorisation’

means an act whereby a Member State grants an authorisation or delegates powers to a recognised organisation;

(g)

‘statutory certificate’

means a certificate issued by or on behalf of a flag State in accordance with the international conventions;

(h)

‘rules and procedures’

means a recognised organisation's requirements for the design, construction, equipment, maintenance and survey of ships;

(i)

‘class certificate’

means a document issued by a recognised organisation certifying the fitness of a ship for a particular use or service in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down and made public by that recognised organisation;

(j)

‘location’

means the place of the registered office, central administration or principal place of business of an organisation.

Article 3

1.   Member States which wish to grant an authorisation to any organisation which is not yet recognised shall submit a request for recognition to the Commission together with complete information on, and evidence of, the organisation's compliance with the minimum criteria set out in Annex I and on the requirement and its undertaking that it shall comply with the provisions of Articles 8(4), 9, 10 and 11.

2.   The Commission, together with the respective Member States submitting the request, shall carry out assessments of the organisations for which the request for recognition was received in order to verify that the organisations meet and undertake to comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 1.

3.   The Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 12(3), refuse to recognise organisations which fail to meet the requirements referred to in paragraph 1 or whose performance is considered an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment on the basis of the criteria laid down in accordance with Article 14.

Article 4

1.   Recognition shall be granted by the Commission in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 12(3).

2.   Recognition shall only be granted to organisations, which meet the requirements referred to in Article 3.

3.   Recognition shall be granted to the relevant legal entity, which is the parent entity of all legal entities that constitute the recognised organisation. The recognition shall encompass all legal entities that contribute to ensuring that that organisation provides cover for their services worldwide.

4.   The Commission, acting in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 12(3), may limit the recognition as regards certain types of ships, ships of a certain size, certain trades, or a combination thereof, in accordance with the proven capacity and expertise of the organisation concerned. In such a case, the Commission shall state the reasons for the limitation and the conditions under which the limitation shall be removed or can be widened. The limitation may be reviewed at any time.

5.   The Commission shall draw up and regularly update a list of the organisations recognised in accordance with this Article. That list shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 5

Where the Commission considers that a recognised organisation has failed to fulfil the minimum criteria set out in the Annex I or its obligations under this Regulation, or that the safety and pollution prevention performance of a recognised organisation has worsened significantly, without, however, it constituting an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment, it shall require the recognised organisation concerned to undertake the necessary preventive and remedial action within specified deadlines to ensure full compliance with those minimum criteria and obligations and, in particular, remove any potential threat to safety or the environment, or to otherwise address the causes of the worsening performance.

The preventive and remedial action may include interim protective measures when the potential threat to safety or the environment is immediate.

However, and without prejudice to their immediate implementation, the Commission shall give to all Member States which have granted an authorisation to the recognised organisation concerned, advance notice of the measures that it intends to take.

Article 6

1.   In addition to the measures taken under Article 5, the Commission may, in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 12(2), impose fines on a recognised organisation:

| (a) | whose serious or repeated failure to fulfil the minimum criteria set out in Annex I or its obligations under Articles 8(4), 9, 10 and 11 or whose worsening performance reveals serious shortcomings in its structure, systems, procedures or internal controls;
  or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

whose serious or repeated failure to fulfil the minimum criteria set out in Annex I or its obligations under Articles 8(4), 9, 10 and 11 or whose worsening performance reveals serious shortcomings in its structure, systems, procedures or internal controls;

or

| (b) | which has deliberately provided incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to the Commission in the course of its assessment pursuant to Article 8(1) or otherwise obstructed that assessment. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

which has deliberately provided incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to the Commission in the course of its assessment pursuant to Article 8(1) or otherwise obstructed that assessment.

2.   Without prejudice to paragraph 1, where a recognised organisation fails to undertake the preventive and remedial action required by the Commission, or incurs unjustified delays, the Commission may impose periodic penalty payments on that organisation until the required action is fully carried out.

3.   The fines and periodic penalty payments referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be dissuasive and proportionate to both the gravity of the case and the economic capacity of the recognised organisation concerned, taking into account, in particular, the extent to which safety or the protection of the environment has been compromised.

They shall be imposed only after the recognised organisation and the Member States concerned have been given the opportunity to submit their observations.

The aggregate amount of the fines and periodic penalty payments imposed shall not exceed 5 % of the total average turnover of the recognised organisation in the preceding three business years for the activities falling under the scope of this Regulation.

4.   The Court of Justice of the European Communities shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby the Commission has fixed a fine or periodic penalty payment. It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine or periodic penalty payment imposed.

Article 7

1.   The Commission shall withdraw the recognition of an organisation:

| (a) | whose repeated and serious failure to fulfil the minimum criteria set out in Annex I or its obligations under this Regulation is such that it constitutes an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

whose repeated and serious failure to fulfil the minimum criteria set out in Annex I or its obligations under this Regulation is such that it constitutes an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment;

| (b) | whose repeated and serious failure in its safety and pollution prevention performance is such that it constitutes an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

whose repeated and serious failure in its safety and pollution prevention performance is such that it constitutes an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment;

| (c) | which prevents or repeatedly obstructs the assessment by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

which prevents or repeatedly obstructs the assessment by the Commission;

| (d) | which fails to pay the fines and/or periodic penalty payments referred to in Article 6(1) and (2); or |
| --- | --- |

(d)

which fails to pay the fines and/or periodic penalty payments referred to in Article 6(1) and (2); or

| (e) | which seeks to obtain financial cover or reimbursement of any fines imposed on it pursuant to Article 6. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

which seeks to obtain financial cover or reimbursement of any fines imposed on it pursuant to Article 6.

2.   For the purpose of points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1, the Commission shall decide on the basis of all the available information, including:

| (a) | the results of its own assessment of the recognised organisation concerned pursuant to Article 8(1); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the results of its own assessment of the recognised organisation concerned pursuant to Article 8(1);

| (b) | reports submitted by Member States pursuant to Article 10 of Directive .../.../EC; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

reports submitted by Member States pursuant to Article 10 of Directive .../.../EC;

| (c) | analyses of casualties involving ships classed by the recognised organisations; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

analyses of casualties involving ships classed by the recognised organisations;

| (d) | any recurrence of the shortcomings referred to in point (a) of Article 6(1); |
| --- | --- |

(d)

any recurrence of the shortcomings referred to in point (a) of Article 6(1);

| (e) | the extent to which the fleet in the recognised organisation's class is affected; and |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the extent to which the fleet in the recognised organisation's class is affected; and

| (f) | the ineffectiveness of the measures referred to in Article 6(2). |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the ineffectiveness of the measures referred to in Article 6(2).

3.   Withdrawal of recognition shall be decided by the Commission, upon its own initiative or at the request of a Member State, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 12(3) and after the recognised organisation concerned has been given the opportunity to submit its observations.

Article 8

1.   All the recognised organisations shall be assessed by the Commission, together with the Member State which submitted the relevant request for recognition, on a regular basis and at least every two years to verify that they meet the obligations under this Regulation and fulfil the minimum criteria set out in Annex I. The assessment shall be confined to those activities of the recognised organisations, which fall within the scope of this Regulation.

2.   In selecting the recognised organisations for assessment, the Commission shall pay particular attention to the safety and pollution prevention performance of the recognised organisation, to the casualty records and to the reports produced by Member States in accordance with Article 10 of Directive .../.../EC.

3.   The assessment may include a visit to regional branches of the recognised organisation as well as random inspection of ships, both in service and under construction, for the purpose of auditing the recognised organisation's performance. In this case the Commission shall, where appropriate, inform the Member State in which the regional branch is located. The Commission shall provide the Member States with a report on the results of the assessment.

4.   Each recognised organisation shall make available the results of its quality system management review to the Committee referred to in Article 12(1), on an annual basis.

Article 9

1.   Recognised organisations shall ensure that the Commission has access to the information necessary for the purposes of the assessment referred to in Article 8(1). No contractual clauses may be invoked to restrict this access.

2.   Recognised organisations shall ensure in their contracts with shipowners or operators for the issue of statutory certificates or class certificates to a ship that such issue shall be made conditional on the parties not opposing the access of the Commission inspectors on board that ship for the purposes of Article 8(1).

Article 10

1.   The recognised organisations shall consult with each other periodically with a view to maintaining equivalence and aiming for harmonisation of their rules and procedures and the implementation thereof. They shall cooperate with each other with a view to achieving consistent interpretation of the international conventions, without prejudice to the powers of the flag States. Recognised organisations shall, in appropriate cases, agree on the technical and procedural conditions under which they will mutually recognise the certificates for materials, equipment and components based on equivalent standards, taking the most demanding and rigorous standards as their reference.

In case mutual recognition cannot be agreed upon for serious safety reasons, recognised organisations shall clearly state the reasons thereof.

Where a recognised organisation ascertains by inspection or otherwise that material, a piece of equipment or a component is not in compliance with its certificate, that organisation may refuse to authorise the placing on board of that material, piece of equipment or component. The recognised organisation shall immediately inform the other recognised organisations, stating the reasons for its refusal.

Recognised organisations shall recognise, for classification purposes, certificates of marine equipment bearing the wheelmark in accordance with Council Directive 96/98/EC of 20 December 1996 on marine equipment (8).

8

They shall provide the Commission and the Member States with periodic reports on fundamental progress in standards and mutual recognition of certificates for materials, equipment and components.

2.   The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council by ... (9), based on an independent study, on the level reached in the process of harmonising the rules and procedures and on mutual recognition of certificates for materials, equipment and components.

9

3.   The recognised organisations shall cooperate with port State control administrations where a ship of their class is concerned, in particular in order to facilitate the rectification of reported deficiencies or other discrepancies.

4.   The recognised organisations shall provide to all Member States' administrations which have granted any of the authorisations provided for in Article 3 of Directive .../.../EC and to the Commission all relevant information about their classed fleet, transfers, changes, suspensions and withdrawals of class, irrespective of the flag the ships fly.

Information on transfers, changes, suspensions, and withdrawals of class, including information on all overdue surveys, overdue recommendations, conditions of class, operating conditions or operating restrictions issued against their classed ships, irrespective of the flag the ships fly, shall also be communicated electronically to the common inspection database used by the Member States for the implementation of Directive .../.../EC at the same time as it is recorded within the recognised organisation's own systems and in any case no later than 72 hours after the event that gave rise to the obligation to communicate the information. That information, with the exception of recommendations and conditions of class which are not overdue, shall be published on the website of these recognised organisations.

5.   The recognised organisations shall not issue statutory certificates to a ship, irrespective of its flag, which has been declassed or is changing class for safety reasons, before giving the opportunity to the competent administration of the flag State to give its opinion within a reasonable time as to whether a full inspection is necessary.

6.   In cases of transfer of class from one recognised organisation to another, the losing organisation shall, without undue delay, provide the gaining organisation with the complete history file of the ship and, in particular, inform it of:

| (a) | any overdue surveys; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

any overdue surveys;

| (b) | any overdue recommendations and conditions of class; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

any overdue recommendations and conditions of class;

| (c) | operating conditions issued against the ship; and |
| --- | --- |

(c)

operating conditions issued against the ship; and

| (d) | operating restrictions issued against the ship. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

operating restrictions issued against the ship.

New certificates for the ship can be issued by the gaining organisation only after all overdue surveys have been satisfactorily completed and all overdue recommendations or conditions of class previously issued in respect of the ship have been completed as specified by the losing organisation.

Prior to the issue of the certificates, the gaining organisation must advise the losing organisation of the date of issue of the certificates and confirm the date, place and action taken to satisfy each overdue survey, overdue recommendation and overdue condition of class.

Recognised organisations shall establish and implement appropriate common requirements concerning cases of transfer of class where special precautions are necessary. Those cases shall, as a minimum, include the transfer of class of ships of 15 years of age or over and the transfer from a non-recognised organisation to a recognised organisation.

Recognised organisations shall cooperate with each other in properly implementing the provisions of this paragraph.

Article 11

1.   Recognised organisations shall set up by ... (10) and maintain an independent Quality Assessment and Certification System in accordance with the applicable international quality standards where the relevant professional associations working in the shipping industry may participate in an advisory capacity.

10

2.   The Quality Assessment and Certification System shall carry out the following tasks:

| (a) | periodic assessment of the quality management systems of recognised organisations, in accordance with the ISO 9001 quality standard criteria; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

periodic assessment of the quality management systems of recognised organisations, in accordance with the ISO 9001 quality standard criteria;

| (b) | certification of the quality management systems of recognised organisations, including organisations for which recognition has been requested in accordance with Article 3; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

certification of the quality management systems of recognised organisations, including organisations for which recognition has been requested in accordance with Article 3;

| (c) | issue of interpretations of internationally recognised quality management standards, in particular to take account of the specific features of the nature and obligations of recognised organisations; and |
| --- | --- |

(c)

issue of interpretations of internationally recognised quality management standards, in particular to take account of the specific features of the nature and obligations of recognised organisations; and

| (d) | drawing up of individual and collective recommendations for the improvement of recognised organisations' processes and internal control mechanisms. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

drawing up of individual and collective recommendations for the improvement of recognised organisations' processes and internal control mechanisms.

3.   The Quality Assessment and Certification System shall have the necessary governance and competences to act independently of the recognised organisations and shall have the necessary means to carry out its duties effectively and to the highest professional standards. The Quality Assessment and Certification System will lay down its working methods and rules of procedure.

4.   The Quality Assessment and Certification System shall adopt an annual work plan.

5.   The Quality Assessment and Certification System may request assistance from other external quality assessment bodies.

6.   The Quality Assessment and Certification System shall provide the interested parties, including Flag States and the Commission, with full information on its annual work plan as well as on its findings and recommendations, particularly with regard to situations where safety might have been compromised.

7.   The Quality Assessment and Certification System shall be periodically assessed by the Commission.

8.   The Commission shall report to the Member States on the results and follow-up of its assessment.

Article 12

1.   The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS) established by Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 (11).

11

2.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

3.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.

4.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1) to (4) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

Article 13

1.   This Regulation may, without broadening its scope, be amended in order to update the minimum criteria set out in Annex I taking into account, in particular, the relevant decisions of the IMO.

These measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 12(4).

2.   Amendments to the international conventions defined in Article 2(b) of this Regulation may be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.

Article 14

1.   The Commission shall adopt and publish:

| (a) | criteria to measure the effectiveness of the rules and procedures as well as the performance of the recognised organisations as regards the safety of, and the prevention of pollution from, their classed ships, having particular regard to the data produced by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control and/or by other similar schemes; and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

criteria to measure the effectiveness of the rules and procedures as well as the performance of the recognised organisations as regards the safety of, and the prevention of pollution from, their classed ships, having particular regard to the data produced by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control and/or by other similar schemes; and

| (b) | criteria to determine when such performance is to be considered an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment, which may take into account specific circumstances affecting smaller-sized or highly specialised organisations. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

criteria to determine when such performance is to be considered an unacceptable threat to safety or the environment, which may take into account specific circumstances affecting smaller-sized or highly specialised organisations.

These measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 12(4).

2.   The measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it relating to the implementation of Article 6 and, if appropriate, Article 7 shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 12(4).

3.   Without prejudice to the immediate application of the minimum criteria set out in Annex I, the Commission may, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 12(3), adopt rules on their interpretation and may consider the establishment of objectives for the general minimum criteria referred to in point 3, Part A of Annex I.

Article 15

1.   The organisations which, at the entry into force of this Regulation, had been granted recognition in accordance with Directive 94/57/EC shall retain their recognition, subject to the provisions of paragraph 2.

2.   Without prejudice to Articles 5 and 7, the Commission shall re-examine all limited recognitions granted under Directive 94/57/EC in light of Article 4(3) of this Regulation by ... (12), with a view to deciding, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 12(3), whether the limitations are to be replaced by others or removed. The limitations shall continue to apply until the Commission has taken a decision.

12

Article 16

In the course of the assessment pursuant to Article 8(1), the Commission shall verify that the holder of the recognition is the relevant legal entity within the organisation to which the provisions of this Regulation shall apply. If that is not the case, the Commission shall take a decision amending that recognition.

Where the Commission amends the recognition, the Member States shall adapt their agreements with the recognised organisation to take account of the amendment.

Article 17

The Commission shall, on a biennial basis, inform the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation.

Article 18

References in Community and national law to Directive 94/57/EC shall be construed, as appropriate, as being made to this Regulation and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II.

Article 19

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at ...

For the European Parliament

The President

...

For the Council

The President

...

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 23.12.2006, p. 195.

1

(2)  OJ C 229, 22.9.2006, p. 38.

2

(3)  Opinion of the European Parliament of 25 April 2007 (OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p. 632), Council Common Position of 6 June 2008 and Position of the European Parliament of...(not yet published in the Official Journal).

3

(4)  OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 20. Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/84/EC (OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 53).

4

(5)  OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11).

5

(6)  OJ L 208 5.8.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006, (OJ L 304, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

6

(7)  OJ L ...

7

(8)  OJ L 46, 17.2.1997, p. 25. Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/84/EC (OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 53).

8

(9)  Five years from the entry into force of this Regulation.

9

(10)  24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.

10

(11)  OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 93/2007 (OJ L 22, 31.1.2007, p. 12).

11

(12)  Twelve months after the entry into force of this Regulation.

12

---

ANNEX I

MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR ORGANISATIONS

(Referred to in Article 3)

A.   GENERAL MINIMUM CRITERIA

| 1. | A recognised organisation must have legal personality in the State of its location. Its accounts shall be certified by independent auditors. |
| --- | --- |

1.

A recognised organisation must have legal personality in the State of its location. Its accounts shall be certified by independent auditors.

| 2. | The recognised organisation must be able to document extensive experience in assessing the design and construction of merchant ships. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The recognised organisation must be able to document extensive experience in assessing the design and construction of merchant ships.

| 3. | The recognised organisation must be equipped at all times with significant managerial, technical, support and research staff commensurate with the size of the fleet in its class, its composition and the organisation's involvement in the construction and conversion of ships. The recognised organisation must be capable of assigning to every place of work, when and as needed, means and staff commensurate with the tasks to be carried out in accordance with general minimum criteria under points 6 and 7 and with the specific minimum criteria under part B. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The recognised organisation must be equipped at all times with significant managerial, technical, support and research staff commensurate with the size of the fleet in its class, its composition and the organisation's involvement in the construction and conversion of ships. The recognised organisation must be capable of assigning to every place of work, when and as needed, means and staff commensurate with the tasks to be carried out in accordance with general minimum criteria under points 6 and 7 and with the specific minimum criteria under part B.

| 4. | The recognised organisation must have and apply a set of own comprehensive rules and procedures, or the demonstrated ability thereto, for the design, construction and periodic survey of merchant ships, having the quality of internationally recognised standards. They must be published and continually upgraded and improved through research and development programmes. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The recognised organisation must have and apply a set of own comprehensive rules and procedures, or the demonstrated ability thereto, for the design, construction and periodic survey of merchant ships, having the quality of internationally recognised standards. They must be published and continually upgraded and improved through research and development programmes.

| 5. | The recognised organisation must have its register of ships published on an annual basis or maintained in an electronic base accessible to the public. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The recognised organisation must have its register of ships published on an annual basis or maintained in an electronic base accessible to the public.

| 6. | The recognised organisation must not be controlled by shipowners or shipbuilders, or by others engaged commercially in the manufacture, equipping, repair or operation of ships. The recognised organisation is not substantially dependent on a single commercial enterprise for its revenue. The recognised organisation does not carry out class or statutory work if it is identical to or has business, personal or family links to the shipowner or operator. This incompatibility shall also apply to surveyors employed by the recognised organisation. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The recognised organisation must not be controlled by shipowners or shipbuilders, or by others engaged commercially in the manufacture, equipping, repair or operation of ships. The recognised organisation is not substantially dependent on a single commercial enterprise for its revenue. The recognised organisation does not carry out class or statutory work if it is identical to or has business, personal or family links to the shipowner or operator. This incompatibility shall also apply to surveyors employed by the recognised organisation.

| 7. | The recognised organisation must operate in accordance with the provisions set out in the Annex to IMO Resolution A.789(19) on specifications on the survey and certification functions of recognised organisations acting on behalf of the administration, insofar as they cover matters falling within the scope of this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The recognised organisation must operate in accordance with the provisions set out in the Annex to IMO Resolution A.789(19) on specifications on the survey and certification functions of recognised organisations acting on behalf of the administration, insofar as they cover matters falling within the scope of this Regulation.

B.   SPECIFIC MINIMUM CRITERIA

| 1. | The recognised organisation must provide worldwide coverage by its exclusive surveyors or, in exceptional and duly justified cases, through exclusive surveyors of other recognised organisations. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The recognised organisation must provide worldwide coverage by its exclusive surveyors or, in exceptional and duly justified cases, through exclusive surveyors of other recognised organisations.

| 2. | The recognised organisation must be governed by a code of ethics. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The recognised organisation must be governed by a code of ethics.

| 3. | The recognised organisation must be managed and administered in such a way as to ensure the confidentiality of information required by the administration. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The recognised organisation must be managed and administered in such a way as to ensure the confidentiality of information required by the administration.

| 4. | The recognised organisation must provide relevant information to the administration, to the Commission and to the interested parties. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The recognised organisation must provide relevant information to the administration, to the Commission and to the interested parties.

| 5. | The recognised organisation, its surveyors and its technical staff shall carry out their work without in any way harming the intellectual property rights of shipyards, equipment suppliers, and shipowners, including patents, licences, know-how, or any other kind of knowledge whose use is legally protected at Community or national level; under no circumstances, and without prejudice to the assessment powers of Member States and the Commission and in particular under Article 9, may either the recognised organisation or the surveyors and technical staff, whom it employs pass on or divulge commercially relevant data obtained in the course of their work of inspecting, checking, and monitoring ships under construction or repair. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The recognised organisation, its surveyors and its technical staff shall carry out their work without in any way harming the intellectual property rights of shipyards, equipment suppliers, and shipowners, including patents, licences, know-how, or any other kind of knowledge whose use is legally protected at Community or national level; under no circumstances, and without prejudice to the assessment powers of Member States and the Commission and in particular under Article 9, may either the recognised organisation or the surveyors and technical staff, whom it employs pass on or divulge commercially relevant data obtained in the course of their work of inspecting, checking, and monitoring ships under construction or repair.

| 6. | The recognised organisation's management must define and document its policy and objectives for, and commitment to, quality and must ensure that this policy is understood, implemented and maintained at all levels in the recognised organisation. The recognised organisation's policy must refer to safety and pollution prevention performance targets and indicators. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The recognised organisation's management must define and document its policy and objectives for, and commitment to, quality and must ensure that this policy is understood, implemented and maintained at all levels in the recognised organisation. The recognised organisation's policy must refer to safety and pollution prevention performance targets and indicators.

| 7. | The recognised organisation must ensure that:






  (a) | its rules and procedures are established and maintained in a systematic manner; |
| --- | --- | --- |

7.

The recognised organisation must ensure that:

(a)

its rules and procedures are established and maintained in a systematic manner;

| (b) | its rules and procedures are complied with and an internal system to measure the quality of service in relation to these rules and procedures is put in place; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

its rules and procedures are complied with and an internal system to measure the quality of service in relation to these rules and procedures is put in place;

| (c) | the requirements of the statutory work for which the recognised organisation is authorised are satisfied and an internal system to measure the quality of service in relation to compliance with the international conventions is put in place; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the requirements of the statutory work for which the recognised organisation is authorised are satisfied and an internal system to measure the quality of service in relation to compliance with the international conventions is put in place;

| (d) | the responsibilities, powers and interrelation of personnel whose work affects the quality of the recognised organisation's services are defined and documented; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the responsibilities, powers and interrelation of personnel whose work affects the quality of the recognised organisation's services are defined and documented;

| (e) | all work is carried out under controlled conditions; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

all work is carried out under controlled conditions;

| (f) | a supervisory system is in place which monitors the actions and work carried out by surveyors and technical and administrative staff employed by the recognised organisation; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

a supervisory system is in place which monitors the actions and work carried out by surveyors and technical and administrative staff employed by the recognised organisation;

| (g) | surveyors have an extensive knowledge of the particular type of ship on which they carry out their work as relevant to the particular survey to be carried out and of the relevant applicable requirements; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

surveyors have an extensive knowledge of the particular type of ship on which they carry out their work as relevant to the particular survey to be carried out and of the relevant applicable requirements;

| (h) | a system for qualification of surveyors and continuous updating of their knowledge is implemented; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

a system for qualification of surveyors and continuous updating of their knowledge is implemented;

| (i) | records are maintained, demonstrating achievement of the required standards in the items covered by the services performed, as well as the effective operation of the quality system; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

records are maintained, demonstrating achievement of the required standards in the items covered by the services performed, as well as the effective operation of the quality system;

| (j) | a comprehensive system of planned and documented internal audits of the quality related activities is maintained in all locations; |
| --- | --- |

(j)

a comprehensive system of planned and documented internal audits of the quality related activities is maintained in all locations;

| (k) | the statutory surveys and inspections required by the Harmonised System of Survey and Certification for which the recognised organisation is authorised are carried out in accordance with the provision set out in the Annex and Appendix to IMO Resolution A.948(23) on Survey Guidelines under the Harmonised System of Survey and Certification; |
| --- | --- |

(k)

the statutory surveys and inspections required by the Harmonised System of Survey and Certification for which the recognised organisation is authorised are carried out in accordance with the provision set out in the Annex and Appendix to IMO Resolution A.948(23) on Survey Guidelines under the Harmonised System of Survey and Certification;

| (l) | clear and direct lines of responsibility and control are established between the central and the regional offices of the recognised organisation and between the recognised organisations and their surveyors. |
| --- | --- |

(l)

clear and direct lines of responsibility and control are established between the central and the regional offices of the recognised organisation and between the recognised organisations and their surveyors.

| 8. | The recognised organisation must have developed, implemented and must maintain an effective internal quality system based on appropriate parts of internationally recognised quality standards and in compliance with EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004 (inspection bodies) and with EN ISO 9001:2000 (quality management systems, requirements), as interpreted and certified by the Quality Assessment and Certification System referred to in Article 11(1). |
| --- | --- |

8.

The recognised organisation must have developed, implemented and must maintain an effective internal quality system based on appropriate parts of internationally recognised quality standards and in compliance with EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004 (inspection bodies) and with EN ISO 9001:2000 (quality management systems, requirements), as interpreted and certified by the Quality Assessment and Certification System referred to in Article 11(1).

| 9. | The rules and procedures of the recognised organisation must be implemented in such a way that the organisation remains in a position to derive from its own direct knowledge and judgement a reliable and objective declaration on the safety of the ships concerned by means of class certificates on the basis of which statutory certificates can be issued. |
| --- | --- |

9.

The rules and procedures of the recognised organisation must be implemented in such a way that the organisation remains in a position to derive from its own direct knowledge and judgement a reliable and objective declaration on the safety of the ships concerned by means of class certificates on the basis of which statutory certificates can be issued.

| 10. | The recognised organisation must have the necessary means of assessing, through the use of qualified professional staff and pursuant to the provisions set out in the Annex to IMO Resolution A.913(22) on Guidelines on implementation of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code by administrations, the application and maintenance of the safety management system, both shore-based and on board ships, intended to be covered in the certification. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The recognised organisation must have the necessary means of assessing, through the use of qualified professional staff and pursuant to the provisions set out in the Annex to IMO Resolution A.913(22) on Guidelines on implementation of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code by administrations, the application and maintenance of the safety management system, both shore-based and on board ships, intended to be covered in the certification.

| 11. | The recognised organisation must allow participation in the development of its rules and procedures by representatives of the administration and other parties concerned. |
| --- | --- |

11.

The recognised organisation must allow participation in the development of its rules and procedures by representatives of the administration and other parties concerned.

---

ANNEX II

CORRELATION TABLE

| Directive 94/57/EC | Directive .../.../EC | This Regulation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Article 1 | Article 1 | Article 1 |
| Article 2(a) | Article 2(a) | Article 2(a) |
| Article 2(b) | Article 2(b) | – |
| Article 2(c) | Article 2(c) | – |
| Article 2(d) | Article 2(d) | Article 2(b) |
| Article 2(e) | Article 2(e) | Article 2(c) |
| – | Article 2(f) | Article 2(d) |
| Article 2(f) | Article 2(g) | Article 2(e) |
| Article 2(g) | Article 2(h) | Article 2(f) |
| Article 2(h) | Article 2(i) | Article 2(g) |
| Article 2(i) | Article 2(k) | Article 2(i) |
| – | Article 2(j) | Article 2(h) |
| Article 2(j) | Article 2(l) | – |
| Article 2(k) | – | Article 2(j) |
| Article 3 | Article 3 | |
| Article 4(1) first phrase | – | Article 3(1) |
| Article 4(1) second phrase | - | Article 3(2) |
| Article 4(1) third phrase | - | – |
| Article 4(1) fourth phrase | - | Article 4(1) |
| – | - | Article 3(3) |
| – | - | Article 4(2), (3), (4) |
| - | - | Article 5 |
| - | - | Article 6 |
| - | - | Article 7 |
| Article 5(1) | Article 4(1) | - |
| Article 5(3) | Article 4(2) | - |
| Article 6(1), (2), (3), (4) | Article 5(1), (2), (3), (4) | - |
| Article 6(5) | – | - |
| Article 7 | Article 6 | Article 12 |
| Article 8(1) first indent | Article 7(1), point (a) of first subparagraph | - |
| Article 8(1) second indent | – | Article 13(1) |
| Article 8(1) third indent | Article 7(1), point (b) of first subparagraph | - |
| – | Article 7(1) second subparagraph | Article 13(1) second subparagraph |
| Article 8(2) | Article 7(2) | - |
| Article 8(2) second subparagraph | - | Article 13(2) |
| Article 9(1) | - | - |
| Article 9(2) | - | - |
| Article 10(1) introductory wording | Article 8 | - |
| Article 10(1)(a), (b), (c), (2), (3), (4) | – | – |
| Article 11(1), (2) | Article 9(1), (2) | - |
| Article 11(3), (4) | - | Article 8(1), (2) |
| Article 12 | Article 10 | - |
| Article 13 | – | – |
| Article 14 | Article 11(1), (2) | - |
| – | Article 11(3) | - |
| - | Article 12 | - |
| – | - | Article 9 |
| Article 15(1) | - | - |
| - | - | Article 10(1), (2) |
| Article 15(2) | - | Article 10(3) |
| Article 15(3) | – | Article 10(4) |
| Article 15(4) | - | Article 10(5) |
| Article 15(5) | - | Article 10(6) first, second, third, fifth subparagraphs |
| – | - | Article 10(6) fourth subparagraph |
| Article 16 | Article 13 | – |
| Article 17 | Article 16 | – |
| – | Article 14 | – |
| – | Article 15 | – |
| - | - | Article 11 |
| - | - | Article 14 |
| - | - | Article 15 |
| - | - | Article 16 |
| - | - | Article 17 |
| - | - | Article 18 |
| - | - | Article 19 |
| Annex | - | Annex I |
| - | Annex I | - |
| - | Annex II | Annex II |

Directive 94/57/EC

Directive .../.../EC

This Regulation

Article 1

Article 1

Article 1

Article 2(a)

Article 2(a)

Article 2(a)

Article 2(b)

Article 2(b)

–

Article 2(c)

Article 2(c)

–

Article 2(d)

Article 2(d)

Article 2(b)

Article 2(e)

Article 2(e)

Article 2(c)

–

Article 2(f)

Article 2(d)

Article 2(f)

Article 2(g)

Article 2(e)

Article 2(g)

Article 2(h)

Article 2(f)

Article 2(h)

Article 2(i)

Article 2(g)

Article 2(i)

Article 2(k)

Article 2(i)

–

Article 2(j)

Article 2(h)

Article 2(j)

Article 2(l)

–

Article 2(k)

–

Article 2(j)

Article 3

Article 3

Article 4(1) first phrase

–

Article 3(1)

Article 4(1) second phrase

-

Article 3(2)

Article 4(1) third phrase

-

–

Article 4(1) fourth phrase

-

Article 4(1)

–

-

Article 3(3)

–

-

Article 4(2), (3), (4)

-

-

Article 5

-

-

Article 6

-

-

Article 7

Article 5(1)

Article 4(1)

-

Article 5(3)

Article 4(2)

-

Article 6(1), (2), (3), (4)

Article 5(1), (2), (3), (4)

-

Article 6(5)

–

-

Article 7

Article 6

Article 12

Article 8(1) first indent

Article 7(1), point (a) of first subparagraph

-

Article 8(1) second indent

–

Article 13(1)

Article 8(1) third indent

Article 7(1), point (b) of first subparagraph

-

–

Article 7(1) second subparagraph

Article 13(1) second subparagraph

Article 8(2)

Article 7(2)

-

Article 8(2) second subparagraph

-

Article 13(2)

Article 9(1)

-

-

Article 9(2)

-

-

Article 10(1) introductory wording

Article 8

-

Article 10(1)(a), (b), (c), (2), (3), (4)

–

–

Article 11(1), (2)

Article 9(1), (2)

-

Article 11(3), (4)

-

Article 8(1), (2)

Article 12

Article 10

-

Article 13

–

–

Article 14

Article 11(1), (2)

-

–

Article 11(3)

-

-

Article 12

-

–

-

Article 9

Article 15(1)

-

-

-

-

Article 10(1), (2)

Article 15(2)

-

Article 10(3)

Article 15(3)

–

Article 10(4)

Article 15(4)

-

Article 10(5)

Article 15(5)

-

Article 10(6) first, second, third, fifth subparagraphs

–

-

Article 10(6) fourth subparagraph

Article 16

Article 13

–

Article 17

Article 16

–

–

Article 14

–

–

Article 15

–

-

-

Article 11

-

-

Article 14

-

-

Article 15

-

-

Article 16

-

-

Article 17

-

-

Article 18

-

-

Article 19

Annex

-

Annex I

-

Annex I

-

-

Annex II

Annex II

---

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS

I.   INTRODUCTION

In the framework of the codecision procedure (art. 251 TEC), the Council reached, on 30 November 2007, a political agreement on two separate legal instruments based on the related Commission proposal (1): a draft Directive on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (recast) and a Regulation on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations (recast). This document concerns the part of the Commission proposal that constitutes the recast Regulation. (2)

Following legal/linguistic revision, the Council adopted its common position on 6 June 2008.

In taking its position, the Council took account of the opinions of the European Economic and Social Committee (3) and of the Committee of Regions (4). A large number of the European Parliament's amendments, adopted at first reading on 25 April 2007 (5), were integrated or reflected in the related text, whether it forms part of the Directive or the Regulation according to the Council's position.

The proposal aims at recasting successive amendments to Directive 94/57/EC establishing common rules and standards for organisations that inspect ships and issue ships' certificates, the so-called ‘recognised organisations’. Furthermore, certain provisions of the existing Directive are amended with a view to simplification or harmonisation or in order to reinforce the current rules, e.g. by strengthening the control of recognised organisations and by reforming the system of penalties against those that do not fulfil the minimum recognition criteria.

II.   ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION

(a)   Form of the legal act

The main issue raised during the discussions in the Council bodies was the form of the legal act proposed by the Commission. Several provisions in the proposed Directive must be understood to either impose obligations directly or devolve competence on the Commission to impose such obligations on individuals, in this case the recognised organisations. This was confirmed by the Council Legal Service in its opinion of 8 October 2007 (doc. 13616/07) that advised to adopt the act in the form of a Regulation or, alternatively, to redraft the provisions in question or to split the act into one Directive and one Regulation.

In its political agreement, the Council agreed to split the text into two separate instruments, a Directive and a Regulation. The Directive includes the provisions addressed to the Member States concerning their relationship with recognised organisations, while the Regulation contains all provisions related to the recognition at Community level, i.e. the granting and the withdrawal of the recognition by the Commission, the obligations and criteria to be fulfilled by the organisations to be eligible for Community recognition as well as possible sanctions against recognised organisations that fail to fulfil these obligations and criteria.

(b)   Main issues related to the Regulation

Apart from the decision to include all provisions related to the Community recognition of ship inspection and survey organisations in a new Regulation, the Council deemed appropriate to modify these provisions for reasons of clarity or based on the following considerations:

1)   Scope of recognition and minimum recognition criteria

The Council, as the European Parliament, considers it important to emphasize that the organisation to be recognised, regardless of its corporate structure, should provide services worldwide. In case of a limited recognition, the common position provides for transparency as to the reasons of the limitation and the conditions to modify it. To avoid any downgrading of the minimum criteria for the recognition, the common position foresees the possibility to fix, through the comitology procedure, rules on the interpretation of, and objectives for, these criteria, in particular concerning the number of staff members to be employed by the recognised organisations.

2)   Imposition of fines against recognised organisations

In the Council's view the Member States are to be informed through the advisory procedure about any decision to be taken by the Commission in order to impose fines against recognised organisations that do not fulfil their obligations under the Regulation.

3)   Harmonisation of rules and procedures of recognised organisations and mutual recognition of certificates issued by them

The Council approves the Commission's proposal to encourage recognised organisations to further harmonise their rules and procedures and to consider when to mutually recognise their certificates for materials, equipment and components. The common position includes, however, a set of safeguard clauses. The latter relate to cases where the mutual recognition of certificates cannot agreed upon between recognised organisations or to cases where it has been confirmed that material, a piece of equipment or a component is not in compliance with its certificate.

In line with the European Parliament, the Commission is asked to provide a report on the level reached in the process of harmonisation of the rules and procedures of recognised organisations and on mutual recognition of certificates issued by them.

4)   Assessment and certification of the quality management systems of recognised organisations

The Council fully agrees with the broad outlines of the Commission's proposal that recognised organisations set up an entity responsible for the assessment and certification of their quality management systems. Mostly in line with the European Parliament's amendment, the Council emphasizes in the common position that this should be done in accordance with the applicable international quality standards and following the advise from the relevant professional associations working in the shipping industry.

Further modifications by the Council of the provisions related to this Quality Assessment and Certification System aim in particular at streamlining the tasks of this entity and clarifying that it must have the necessary governance and competences to act independently of the recognised organisations.

5)   Introduction of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny

In accordance with the amended Comitology Decision (6), the Council introduces in its common position the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to amend the Regulation according to amendments to the international conventions, protocols, codes and resolutions, to update the minimum recognition criteria and to adopt criteria to measure the effectiveness of the rules and procedures as well as the performance of the recognised organisations as regards safety and pollution prevention.

III.   AMENDMENTS

The common position incorporates a large number of the European Parliament's first-reading amendments, either verbatim or partly or in principle: 6, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 71 and 74. The related provisions are often consistent with the amendments, but not identical, due to the necessary adaptation of the text resulting from the splitting of the original proposal into two separate instruments.

The remaining amendments could not be accepted because, in the Council's view, they are not consistent with the procedures of Community recognition (amendment 14), not entirely clear or seem to be redundant (amendments 19, 23, 57 and 67) or are not consistent with the Council's approach to the setting up of the entity responsible for the assessment and certification of the quality management systems of recognised organisations (amendments 63, 65 and partly 74).

IV.   CONCLUSION

The Council believes that its common position is the appropriate way to lay down provisions related to the recognition of ship inspection and survey organisations at Community level by adopting a Regulation, accompanied by a Directive providing for measures to be followed by Member States in their relationship with these organisations.

The text of the common position reflects a large number of the European Parliament's amendments. The Council looks forward to engaging in constructive discussions with the European Parliament with a view to reaching an agreement as soon as possible.

---

(1)  The Commission transmitted on 30 January 2006 its proposal for a recast Directive on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (doc. 5912/06 MAR 11 ENV 50 CODEC 95).

(2)  The Council's common position on the draft Directive is set out in doc. 5724/08, the related statement of reasons in doc. 5724/08 ADD 1.

(3)  CESE 1177/2006 of 13.9.2006 (OJ C 318 of 23.12.2006, p.195-201).

(4)  CdR 43/2006 of 15.6.2006 (OJ C 229 of 22.9.2006, p.38).

(5)  Doc. 8724/07 CODEC 389 MAR 28 ENV 206 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(6)  Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, as amended by Council Decision 2006/512/EC of 17 July 2006 (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11.)

---