alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009077EN.01014801.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/148 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/148

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council Directive on tax exemptions applicable to the permanent introduction from a Member State of the personal property of individuals (Codified version)’

COM(2008) 376 final — 2008/0120 (COD)

(2009/C 77/31)

On 18 June 2008, the Council of the European Union decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on

Tax exemptions applicable to the permanent introduction from a Member State of the personal property of individuals (Codified version).

Tax exemptions applicable to the permanent introduction from a Member State of the personal property of individuals (Codified version).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 447th plenary session of 17 and 18 September 2008 (meeting of 17 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 17 September 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.108 IRB functions and operations. ( a ) In order to fulfill the requirements of this policy each IRB shall: ( 1 ) Have access to meeting space and sufficient staff to support the IRB's review and recordkeeping duties;
( 2 ) Prepare and maintain a current list of the IRB members identified by name; earned degrees; representative capacity; indications of experience such as board certifications or licenses sufficient to describe each member's chief anticipated contributions to IRB deliberations; and any employment or other relationship between each member and the institution, for example, full-time employee, part-time employee, member of governing panel or board, stockholder, paid or unpaid consultant;
( 3 ) Establish and follow written procedures for: ( i ) Conducting its initial and continuing review of research and for reporting its findings and actions to the investigator and the institution;
( ii ) Determining which projects require review more often than annually and which projects need verification from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review; and
( iii ) Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and for ensuring that investigators will conduct the research activity in accordance with the terms of the IRB approval until any proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the IRB, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject.
( 4 ) Establish and follow written procedures for ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB; appropriate institutional officials; the department or agency head; and the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office, or the equivalent office within the appropriate Federal department or agency of ( i ) Any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others or any serious or continuing noncompliance with this policy or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; and
( ii ) Any suspension or termination of IRB approval.
( b ) Except when an expedited review procedure is used (as described in § 46.110), an IRB must review proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRB are present, including at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. In order for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of those members present at the meeting.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
#### CONNELLY *et al. v.*CONNELLY.

Some evidence having been submitted by the plaintiffs which would hav& authorized the jury to find a verdict in their favor, the court erred in. granting a nonsuit.

Submitted June 5,—

Decided November 10, 1906

Equitable petition. Before Judge Roan. Newton superior court. September 18, 1905.

*Greene F. Johnson,*for plaintiffs,

cited: *Ga. R.*7/484-92; 27/444; 123/441; 44 N. H. 531; 9 A. & E. Enc. L. (2d ed.) 122; 2 Enc. Ev. 831.

*James F. Rogers,*for defendant,

cited: *Ga. R.*123/104; 111/821; 110/426; 22 Ark. 92; 18 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 767.

Beck, J.

The plaintiffs in error, as heirs at law of James Connelly, deceased, filed an equitable petition against the defendant in the superior court of Newton county, seeking to recover certain land and to have a deed, made by the deceased to the defendant,, delivered up and cancelled, on the ground that the deceased did not have the, capacity to make it. At the conclusion of the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, the court, upon motion, awarded, a judgment of nonsuit; to which decision the plaintiffs excepted.

An examination of the evidence in the case (which we dc not attempt to set out) convinces us that the court erred in granting the nonsuit, and that the question of the mental capacity or incapacity of the deceased to make the deed in question should have-been submitted to the jury. More than one witness testified that in the opinion of the witness the grantor did not have sufficient mental capacitor to transact business and to make a valid deed; th& *657witnesses stating at the same time facts, circumstances, and matters coming under their observation upon which they based their opinion as to the mental condition of the defendant’s grantor. Whether their conclusions were correct or not was a question for the jury. And the court erred in holding that, as a matter of law, there was not sufficient evidence to authorize a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000708 11-JAN-2019 12:00 PM
§ 264.76 What action will we take if a State fails to remit funds after failing to meet its required Contingency Fund MOE level? ( a ) If, for a fiscal year in which it receives contingency funds, a State fails to meet its required Contingency Fund MOE level, we will penalize the State by reducing the SFAG payable for the next fiscal year by the amount of contingency funds not remitted.
( b ) A State may appeal this decision, as provided in § 262.7 of this chapter.
( c ) The reasonable cause exceptions and corrective compliance regulations at §§ 262.5 and 262.6 of this chapter do not apply to this penalty.
#### § 611.2 Application of part.

This part applies to any program for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under a law administered by the Foundation, including the types of Federal financial assistance listed in appendix A of this part. It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the effective date of the regulation pursuant to an application approved prior to such effective date. This part does not apply to (a) any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contract, (b) money paid, property transferred, or other assistance extended before the effective date of this part, (c) any assistance to any individual who is the ultimate beneficiary, or (d) any employment practice, under any such program, of any employer, employment agency, or labor organization, except to the extent described in § 611.3. The fact that a type of Federal financial assistance is not listed in the appendix shall not mean, if title VI of the Act is otherwise applicable, that a program is not covered. Other types of Federal financial assistance under statutes now in force or hereafter enacted may be added to this list by notice published in the Federal Register.

[29 FR 16305, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 68 FR 51382, Aug. 26, 2003]
June 5, 2020


 


Alpha Capital Anstalt


Lettstrasse 32


 


9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein


 


Dear Sirs:






Reference is made to that
certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2018, by and between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a Nevada corporation
(“AgEagle”) and Alpha Capital Anstalt (the “Alpha”), pursuant to which AgEagle issued and sold
2,000 shares of Series D 8% Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) to Alpha (the “Purchase Agreement”).
On December 26, 2018, AgEagle filed a Certificate of Designation For Nevada Profit Corporations, which set forth the rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions of the Series D Preferred Stock.


 


Alpha has requested, and AgEagle has agreed,
to amend the Series D Preferred Stock so that it shall be convertible, at the option of Alpha, into shares of AgEagle’s common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) from time to time, and shall no longer continue to accrue
dividends. AgEagle and Alpha have agreed that (i) the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock shall be $0.54 (subject
to adjustment) (the “Conversion Price”), and (ii) all accrued, but unpaid dividends of that Series D Preferred
Stock in the amount of $233,333.33 shall be added to increase the Stated Value of the Series D Preferred Stock from $1,000 to $1,116.67.
AgEagle has received the approval of its Board of Directors to amend and restate the Certificate of Designation to amend the terms
of the Series D Preferred Stock (the “Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation”) as set forth above. Upon
the filing of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, the Purchase
Agreement shall terminate and no longer be in full force and effect. AgEagle acknowledges and agrees that no additional consideration
has been given by Alpha for this amendment, and that Alpha’s holding period for the Series D Preferred Stock remains December 27,
2018, and that, subject to any changes to applicable law or regulation subsequent to the date of this letter, any shares of Common
Stock issuable upon any future conversion of any shares of the Series D Preferred Stock shall be issued without restrictive legend.


 


The foregoing sets forth all of the agreed upon
terms for the amendment to the Series D Preferred Stock. By signing below you acknowledge and agree that you are in agreement with
the terms of this letter agreement.


 






     


     


    

 


[Signature Page to AgEagle Series D Side Letter]


 


Sincerely,


 


	AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Nicole Fernandez – McGovern	 
	Name:	Nicole Fernandez – McGovern	 
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer	 
	 	 	 
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:	 
	 	 
	ALPHA CAPITAL ANSTALT	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Nicola Feuerstein	 
	Name:	Nicole Feuerstein	 
	Title:	Secretary	 


 


2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 15, 2007, 12 p.m. to 
February 15, 2007, 6 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the 
Federal Register on January 30, 2007, 72FR4276.
    The meeting notice is changed to reflect the date change from 
February 15, 2007 to March 7, 2007. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1036 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING 

TO ADDRESS THE FRAMEWORK OF THE RULEMAKING PROCESS

FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORS

U.S. Department of Energy

Forrestal Building

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Room 8E-089

Monday, October 18, 2010

9:00 am – 4:00 pm

Purpose

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this informal public meeting to begin the 

rulemaking process for energy efficiency standards for certain electric motors. DOE will present 

its proposed approach to the data gathering, analyses, and methodologies it will use during the 

rulemaking process. This public meeting will provide an opportunity for questions, comments, 

and discussion from those present. In addition and throughout the rulemaking process, DOE 

invites written comments, information, and data from all interested parties.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:05 am Welcome

Doug Brookman

9:05 – 9:20 am Introductions and Agenda Review

Jim Raba

9:20 – 9:40 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties

Jim Raba

9:40 – 9:50 am Regulatory History

Jeremy Gordon

9:50 – 10:15 am Rulemaking Overview and Scope of Coverage

Jeremy Gordon

10:15 – 10:30 am Break

10:30 – 11:00 am Market and Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis

Jeremy Gordon

11:00 – 11:45 am Engineering Analysis
Jeremy Gordon

11:45 – 12:45 pm Break for Lunch

12:45 – 1:00 pm Energy Use Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

1:00 – 1:15 pm Markups for Equipment Price Determination

Sanaee Iyama

1:15 – 1:45 pm Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

1:45 – 2:15 pm Shipments Analysis, National Impacts Analysis, and Life-Cycle Cost 

Subgroup Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

2:15 – 2:30 pm Break

2:30 – 2:40 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Jeremy Gordon

2:40 – 3:10 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis, 

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

3:10 – 3:55 pm Other Issues and Comments; Closing Remarks

Doug Brookman
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE:

999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2017-11: Gallegly for Congress

Campaign Guide for Corporations and Labor Organizations

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Freedom’s Defense Fund (FDF) 

(A13-14)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Conservative Majority Fund (CMF)

(A13-17)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Dayna C. Brown, 

Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Signed: _____________________________________

Dayna C. Brown

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: October 19, 2017
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Managers

DB Commodity Services
LLC:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-163552) of PowerShares DB
US Dollar Index Bullish Fund and Subsidiary of our reports dated February 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish
Fund and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and expenses, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the
period from February 15, 2007 (commencement of investment operations) to December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund and Subsidiary. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated June 25, 2010, with respect to the statements of financial condition, including the schedules of
investments of DB US Dollar Index Bullish Master Fund as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in unitholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2009 and the period from February 15, 2007 (commencement of investment operations) to December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31,
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of DB US Dollar Index BullishMaster Fund.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|New York, New York
|June 25, 2010
August 1, 2011 

Mr. Tom Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director, Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Dear Mr. Hintermister: 

John Kennedy for US Senate is filing this response to FEC Audit Division's Interim Audit Report of 

June 16, 2011. 

With respect to the $131,122 identified in the audit report: 

1. The Committee Is submitting contributor documentation consisting of checic copies and 

credit card receipts In the amount of $ 123,400, along with copies of presumptive 

reattributlon/presumptive redesignation letters sent, as recommended in the Report. 

2. From the list provided by the Audit Division, the Committee in 2010 issued three refunds in 

the amount of $ 2,300 each to Byron A Adams, Jr., John W. Colbert, and Gayie B. or Vinton 

Crosby, and is attaching front and bacic copies ofthe negotiated refund checlcs. 

3. The Committee is sending to the Audit Division a check payable to the US Treasury in the 

amount of $22,600, representing uncashed contribution refund checks. Included in this 

amount is $ 1,000 from the donation of Consuelo Walk from the list provided to the 

Committee by the Audit Division. 

4. It Is the Committee's understanding that with respect to the LLC donations identified In the 

Report, the documentation previously provided to the Audit Division satisfactorily confirms 

that these donations were not excessive, and were not from an impermissible source. 

Thank you for your consideration of this response. 

Sincerely: 

Keith A. Davis, Treasurer 

John Kennedy for US Senate 

Att.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amendment #1 on Form 10-K/A of EnteroMedics Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark B. Knudson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

November 20, 2008
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1695 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the minimum age for 

receipt of military retired pay for non-regular service from 60 to 55. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2009 

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself and Ms. GIFFORDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the minimum age for receipt of military retired pay for nonregular service from 60 to 55. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN MINIMUM AGE FOR RECEIPT OF 

4 MILITARY RETIRED PAY FOR NON-REGULAR 

5 SERVICE. 

6 (a) REDUCTION IN AGE.—Subsection (f) of section 

7 12731 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 

8 647 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

9 Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 160), is 

10 amended— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1695 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘60 years of 

2 age’’ and inserting ‘‘55 years of age’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(A)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment 

5 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

6 Fiscal Year 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘January 28, 

7 2008’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘60 years of age’’ and in9 serting ‘‘the minimum age in effect under para10 graph (1)’’. 

11 (b) APPLICATION TO EXISTING PROVISIONS OF LAW

12 OR POLICY.—With respect to any provision of law, or of 

13 any policy, regulation, or directive of the executive branch, 

14 that refers to a member or former member of the uni15 formed services as being eligible for, or entitled to, retired 

16 pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, 

17 but for the fact that the member or former member is 

18 under 60 years of age, such provision shall be carried out 

19 with respect to that member or former member by sub20 stituting for the reference to being 60 years of age a ref21 erence to having attained the eligibility age applicable to 

22 the member under subsection (f) section 12731 of title 10, 

23 United States Code, as amended by subsection (a). 

24 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

25 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the first 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1695 IH

1 month beginning on or after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act and shall apply to retired pay payable for that 

3 month and subsequent months. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS