alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen D. Allison, Vice President,
Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                                                         |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: March 24, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen D. AllisonStephen D. Allison Vice President, Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Kremenstein, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Martin Kremenstein 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Martin Kremenstein     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
No. 08-5422 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF A.PPEALS 


FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 


EMILY'S LIST. 

PIa intiff-Appellal1l > 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 


Defenda1/ t-Appell ee. 


On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 


Case No. 1 :05-cv-00049 (CKK) 


CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF AMICI CURIAE CAMPAIGN 

LEGAL CENTER AND DEMOCRACY 21 

Pursuant (0 Federal Rule ofAppell ate Procedure 26. 1, amici curiae Campaign 

Legal Center and Democracy 21 make the fol lowing disclosure regarding their corporate 

status: 

The Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan corporation 

worki ng in the areas of campaign finance reronn. voting ri ghts and media law. The CLC 

has no parent corporation and no publicly heJd corporation has any form of ownership 

interest in the CLeo 

Democracy 2 1 is a nonpro fi t, nonpanisan corporation ded icated to making 

democracy work for all Americans, including promoting campaign finance refonu and 

other political refonns to accomplish these goals. Democracy 21 has no parent 

corporation and no publ icly held corporation has any form of ownership interest in 

Democracy 2 i . 
Respectfully submined, 

J. GERALD 

L~ HEBERT 

(D.C. Bar No. 447676) 

Paul S. Ryan 

(D.C. BarNo. 502514) 


THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 


1640 Rhode Island Ave. , N.W. 


Suite 650 

Washington, D.C. 200]6 

Tel: (202) 7]6·2200 

Donald J. Simon 

(D.C. Bar No. 256388) 


SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, 


ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP 


1425 K Street, N.W. 


Suite 600 


Washington, D.C. 20005 


(202) 682·0240 


Fred Wertheimer 

(D.C. Bar No. 1542(1) 

DEMOCRACY 21 

18751 Street, N.W. 

Suite 500 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

(202) 429·2008 

Counsel for Amici Curiae 

Dated: November 14,2008
Argued and submitted April 18,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration May 15,1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Stanley Meyers, Claimant. LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION and Darigold, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*Stanley MEYERS, *Respondent.*

(WCB No. 90-09863; CA A88766)

915 P2d 1058

Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Glen H. Downs argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gerald C. Doblie and Doblie & Associates.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Willhite v. Asplundh Tree Experts,*136 Or App 120, 900 P2d 1092 (1995); *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995), *rev den*322 Or 645.
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

S. RES 

NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO

TREATY

DOC NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

MARINE CORPS 

74 199-2 The following named officers for appointment in 

the United States Marine Corps to the grade 

indicated under title 10, U.S.C., section 624: 

Mar 28, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Major General 

 Brig. Gen. John F. Kelly, 

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

* 117 307 Joseph Timothy Kelliher, of the District of 

Columbia, to be a Member of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission for the term 

expiring June 30, 2012. (Reappointment) 

May 23, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Bingaman, Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON 

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY 

* 152 46 Charles Darwin Snelling, of Pennsylvania, to be a 

Member of the Board of Directors of the 

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 

for a term expiring May 30, 2012. 

(Reappointment) 

May 24, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Inouye, Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 161 412 Michael G. Vickers, of California, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of Defense, vice Thomas W. 

O'Connell. 

Jun 26, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 162 578 Thomas P. D'Agostino, of Maryland, to be Under 

Secretary for Nuclear Security, Department of 

Energy, vice Linton F. Brooks, resigned. 

Jun 26, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR 

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

* 206 73 James R. Kunder, of Virginia, to be Deputy 

Administrator of the United States Agency for 

International Development, vice Frederick W. 

Schieck. 

Jun 27, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4

COAST GUARD 

PN581 COAST GUARD nomination of Jason D. Rimington, which was received by the Senate and appeared 

in the Congressional Record of May 21, 2007. 

PN582 COAST GUARD nomination of Jeffery J. Rasnake, which was received by the Senate and appeared 

in the Congressional Record of May 21, 2007.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

FBR CAPITAL MARKETS CORPORATION

A VIRGINIA CORPORATION



|                                               |  |             
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                             |  | JURISDICTION
|FBR Asset Management Holdings, Inc.            |  | Virginia    
|                                               | 
|FBR Fund Advisers, Inc.                        |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|FBR Investment Management, Inc.                |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|FBR Capital Markets Holdings, Inc.             |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.         |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|FBR Investment Services, Inc.                  |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|Friedman, Billings, Ramsey International, Ltd. |  | England     
|                                               | 
|FBR Investment Services, Inc.                  |  | Virginia    
|                                               | 
|FBR Capital Markets PT, Inc.                   |  | Virginia
#### § 2490.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 2490.150, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40241 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. BO BB Y D EW AY N E JO N ES, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Texas U S D C N o . 6 :00 -C R -7 7 -2 B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * A pp eal i n g t h e j u dg m en ti n a cr i m i n alcase, B obbyD ew ayn e Jon es r ai se s ar gum ent s t hatar e f or ec l os ed by Un itedS ta tes v. D o u b lin , 572 F. 3d 235, 2 3 6 -3 9 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ), pe t i t i o n f o rc e r t . f

i le d (S e p t . 2 1 , 2 0 0 9 ) ( N o . 0 9 -6 6 5 7 ), w h i ch rejectedthe arg u m en t t h a t Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ooker , 543 U . S. 220 ( 2005) appl i es i n 18 U . S. C . § 3582(c ) ( 2) proc ee di ngs and hel d thata di st r i c tc our tm ay n otreduce a sentence bel ow t h e m i n i m u m provi ded i n t h e am en ded G u i del i n es. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 40241

2 The G o ve r nm e nt ’ s m o t i o n f o rs um m ar y af

f i rm an c e i s G RA N TE D , a nd t he j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
Adjustment of Pesticide Concentrations for Temporal 

Changes in Analytical Recovery, 1992–2010 

U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 630 

List of figures in appendix 3 

All of the 52 figures in appendix 3 are in the same format, each one representing a different pesticide or 

degradate. The common caption on each is as follows: 

Comparison of temporal changes in the recovery of [the chemical of interest] in groundwater matrix spikes and in

stream-water matrix spikes. In the bottom graph, boxplots for groundwater matrix spikes are plotted in the first half of 

the year, and boxplots for stream-water matrix spikes are plotted in the second half of the year. The number of 

groundwater spikes is shown at the top of the plot and the number of stream-water spikes is shown at the bottom of 

the plot. Boxplots are explained in figure 1. (Recoveries greater than 200 percent are not shown.) 

Chemicals corresponding to each figure are as follows: 

Figure 3–1 acetochlor 

Figure 3–2 alachlor 

Figure 3–3 atrazine 

Figure 3–4 azinphos−methyl 

Figure 3–5 benfluralin 

Figure 3–6 butylate 

Figure 3–7 carbaryl 
Figure 3–8 carbofuran 

Figure 3–9 chlorpyrifos 

Figure 3–10 cyanazine 

Figure 3–11 Dacthal 

Figure 3–12 p,p ́−DDE 

Figure 3–13 deethylatrazine 

Figure 3–14 desulfinylfipronil 

Figure 3–15 desulfinylfipronil amide 

Figure 3–16 diazinon 

Figure 3–17 dieldrin 

Figure 3–18 2,6−diethylaniline 

Figure 3–19 disulfoton 

Figure 3–20 EPTC 

Figure 3–21 ethalfluralin 

Figure 3–22 ethoprophos 

Figure 3–23 fipronil 

Figure 3–24 fipronil sulfide 

Figure 3–25 fipronil sulfone 

Figure 3–26 fonofos 

Figure 3–27 alpha−HCH 

Figure 3–28 gamma−HCH 

Figure 3–29 linuron 

Figure 3–30 malathion 

Figure 3–31 metolachlor 
Figure 3–32 metribuzin 

Figure 3–33 molinate 

Figure 3–34 napropamide 

Figure 3–35 parathion 

Figure 3–36 parathion−methyl 

Figure 3–37 pebulate 

Figure 3–38 pendimethalin 

Figure 3–39 cis−permethrin 

Figure 3–40 phorate 

Figure 3–41 prometon 

Figure 3–42 propachlor 

Figure 3–43 propanil 

Figure 3–44 propargite 

Figure 3–45 propyzamide 

Figure 3–46 simazine 

Figure 3–47 tebuthiuron 

Figure 3–48 terbacil 

Figure 3–49 terbufos 

Figure 3–50 thiobencarb 

Figure 3–51 triallate 

Figure 3–52 trifluralin
#### § 63.34 Principal investigators.

The principal investigator(s) designated in successful grant applications as responsible for the conduct of the approved project, shall not be replaced without the prior approval of the Assistant Secretary or his designee. Failure to seek and acquire such approval may result in the grant award being terminated in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 75.372 of this subtitle or such other regulations as may be indicated in the grant terms and conditions.

[40 FR 23295, May 29, 1975, as amended at 81 FR 3012, Jan. 20, 2016]
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 75731 

[FR Doc. 06–9744 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 07–07] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 

601–3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 07–07 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification. 

Dated: December 11, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.013</GPH>
75732 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.014</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 75733 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.015</GPH>
75734 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–9745 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 07–08] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 

601–3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 07–08 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

sensitivity of technology, and section 

620C(d). 

Dated: December 11, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.016</GPH>
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Tropical PC, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the
Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and
filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 10, 2009
        --------------
                                    /s/ David D. Selmon
                                    -------------------------------------
                                        David D. Selmon
                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                                and Director

<PAGE>
#### § 707.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
# Senate Floor Activity - Thursday, February 29, 2024

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Thursday, February 29)

 H.R. 7463

64

65

66

67

 S.Amdt. 1614

 S. 3706

 S. 3859

 S.J.Res. 38

61

 S.Res. 570

## Executive Business (Thursday, February 29)

 PN1166

 PN1213

 PN1217

60

 PN1234

 PN1348

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
Cheshire,

No. 5943.

#### State *v.*Richard A. Berge *& a.*

Argued September 3, 1969.

Decided October 31, 1969.

*George S. Pappagianis,*Attorney General, and *Henry P Spa-loss,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mr. Spaloss*orally), for the State.

*Bell & Kennedy (Mr. William H. Kennedy*orally), for the defendants.

Grimes, J.

The defendants were indicted on January 22, 1969, for unlawfully selling a narcotic drug, marijuana, in violation of RSA 318-A:2. There are three indictments against Prevost and one against Berge. At their arraignment and before a plea, they both moved to quash the indictments on the ground that RSA 318-A:21 II which establishes the penalty at a minimum of five years, also provides that “the imposition or execution of sentence shall not be suspended” and is therefore invalid as an unconstitutional encroachment upon the judicial power of the courts. The questions raised by the motions were transferred'without rulings by *Morris,*J.

Although the defendants raise a constitutional question involving the separation o f powers of our government, we do not need to reach that question in this case. By Laws of 1969, ch. 421, the legislative branch repealed RSA ch. 318-A and enacted RSA ch. 318-B (supp) in its place. The new legislation does not purport to impose mandatory minimum sentences nor to prohibit the courts from exercising their power to suspend sentences. In fact, the existence of that power is assumed, *s.*28.

*571It is provided by Laws of 1969, 421:2 (RSA ch. 318-B (supp)) that as to offenses committed prior to the repeal of ch. RSA 318-A “when any punishment, penalty or forfeiture shall be mitigated by the provisions of RSA 318-B . . . such provisions may be extended and applied to any sentences under chapter 318-A pronounced after such repeal.” Thus, since ch. 318-B (supp) is now effective and ch. 318-A has been repealed, neither the mandatory minimum sentence nor the prohibition against suspension of sentence will apply to the defendants who have not been tried and the constitutional question they raise has become moot.

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
§ 675.2 Medical examinations. ( a ) Any individual seeking to travel to Antarctica under sponsorship of the United States Antarctic Program must undergo a medical and dental examination to determine whether the individual is physically qualified for deployment to Antarctica.
( b ) The medical and dental examinations may be conducted by a qualified licensed physician or dentist of the candidate's choosing, or designated by the employing organization, following instructions provided by the USAP. The medical examinations shall include a medical history, physical examination and appropriate clinical tests which address major organ systems for medical conditions inconsistent with safe deployment to Antarctica.
( c ) The candidate's physician/dentist will submit the required medical information on the appropriate USAP-provided forms to a USAP-designated physician who will determine whether the individual is qualified for deployment to Antarctica based upon Medical Clearance Criteria established by the USAP. All information requested on the forms shall be provided.
( d ) Candidates who anticipate spending the austral winter in Antarctica (when evacuation may be impossible) are subject to additional evaluation, including a determination of psychological adaptability for such an isolated assignment. Psychological evaluations of “winter-over” candidates shall be performed by a qualified team of USAP-designated physicians/clinical psychologists.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 16592 Not in labor force Number in thousands 75 years and over 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU05024942Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 75 yrs. & ov er

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:25 PM)
#### § 630.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.