alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Senate Floor Activity - Tuesday, June 17, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Tuesday, June 17)

H.R. 4660

 200

S. 1254

S.Res. 477

## Executive Business (Tuesday, June 17)

PN1244

 198

 199

PN1347

 195

PN1348

 196

PN1400

 197

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
§ 2556.755 May VISTAs participate in lawful demonstrations? In accordance with the prohibitions set forth in § 2556.710, VISTAs may participate in lawful demonstrations, political rallies, and other political meetings, so long as such participation is in conformance with all of the following: ( a ) Occurs only while on authorized leave or while otherwise off duty;
( b ) Does not include attempting to represent, or representing, the views of VISTAs or the VISTA program on any public issue;
( c ) Could not be reasonably understood by the community as being identified with the VISTA program, the project, or other elements of VISTA service; and
( d ) Does not interfere with the discharge of VISTA duties.
#### § 1703.101 Purpose.

This part sets forth the regulations under which the Commission shall engage in public decision-making processes, make public announcement of meetings at which a quorum of or all Commission members consider and determine official Commission action, and inform the public of which meetings they are entitled to observe.
#### Joseph H. Risley, *Respondent, v.*Jesse Carll, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
§ 10.408 Coast Guard-accepted training other than approved courses and programs. ( a ) When the training and assessment of competence required by this part are not subject to Coast Guard approval under §§ 10.402 and 10.407 of this subpart, but are used to qualify a mariner to hold an endorsement, the offeror of the course or program must ensure that such training and assessment meets the same standards as those found in §§ 10.402 and 10.403 of this subpart.
( b ) The Coast Guard will accept courses approved and monitored by a Coast Guard-accepted Quality Standard System (QSS) organization. The Coast Guard maintains a list of training organizations conducting accepted training that are independently monitored by a Coast Guard-accepted QSS organization. The Coast Guard-accepted QSS organization must comply with the following requirements: ( 1 ) Submit a certificate of acceptance of training to the Coast Guard.
( 2 ) Submit an updated certificate of acceptance to the Coast Guard if the terms of acceptance have been changed.
( 3 ) Sign each certificate to the training organization owner or operator, or its authorized representative(s), stating that the training fully complies with the requirements of this section, and identifying the Coast Guard-accepted QSS organization being used for independent monitoring.
( c ) The training must be audited periodically in accordance with the requirements of § 10.409(e)(7) of this subpart. If the Coast Guard determines, on the basis of its own observations or conclusions or those of the Coast Guard-accepted QSS organization, that the particular training does not satisfy one or more of the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section— ( 1 ) The Coast Guard or Coast Guard-accepted QSS organization will so notify the offeror of the training by letter, enclosing a report of the observations and conclusions;
( 2 ) The offeror may, within a period of time specified in the notice, either appeal the observations or conclusions to the Commandant (CG-MMC) or bring the training into compliance; and
( 3 ) If the appeal is denied—or if the deficiency is not corrected in the allotted time, or within any additional time period judged by the Coast Guard to be appropriate, considering progress toward compliance—the Coast Guard will remove the training from the list maintained under paragraph (b) of this section until it can verify full compliance. The Coast Guard may deny applications for endorsements based, in whole or in part, on training not on the list, until additional training or assessment is documented.
[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11216, Mar. 16, 2009, as amended by USCG-2016-0315, 81 FR 43955, July 6, 2016]
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, James G. Jennings III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Date: August 15, 2005.

/s/ James G. Jennings, III
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________

)

STEVE SCHONBERG, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10-02040 

) (JWR-CKK-RWR)

FEDERAL ELECTION )

COMMISSION et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum

Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Federal Election Commission’s motion [32]

to dissolve the three-judge court be, and hereby is, GRANTED. 

 SIGNED this 12th day of May, 2011.

__________/s/_____________________

JUDITH W. ROGERS

United States Court of Appeals for

the District of Columbia Circuit

__________/s/_____________________

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Court for

the District of Columbia

__________/s/_____________________

RICHARD W. ROBERTS

 United States District Court for

the District of Columbia

Case 1:10-cv-02040-RWR -JWR -CKK Document 46 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 1
§ 92.6 Remedial action and voluntary action. ( a ) *Remedial action.* ( 1 ) If the Director finds that a recipient or State Exchange has discriminated against an individual on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability, in violation of section 1557 or this part, such recipient or State Exchange must take such remedial action as the Director may require to overcome the effects of the discrimination.
( 2 ) Where a recipient is found to have discriminated against an individual on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability, in violation of section 1557 or this part, and where another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, the Director, where appropriate, may require either or both entities to take remedial action.
( 3 ) The Director may, where necessary to overcome the effects of discrimination in violation of section 1557 or this part, require a recipient, in its health programs and activities, or State Exchange to take remedial action with respect to: ( i ) Persons who are no longer participants in the recipient's or State Exchange's health program or activity but who were participants in the health program or activity when such discrimination occurred; or
( ii ) Persons who would have been participants in the health program or activity had the discrimination not occurred.
( b ) *Voluntary action.* A covered entity may take nondiscriminatory steps, in addition to any action that is required by section 1557 or this part, to overcome the effects of conditions that result or resulted in limited participation in the covered entity's health programs or activities by persons on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

_________________________________________ 

)

Dave Levinthal, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil No. 15-cv-01624 (APM)

)

Federal Election Commission, )

)

Defendant. )

)

_________________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 20, Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment, ECF No. 13, is granted, and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary 

Judgment, ECF No. 14, is denied. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant.

This is a final, appealable order.

 

Dated: November 23, 2016 Amit P. Mehta

United States District Judge

Case 1:15-cv-01624-APM Document 21 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 1
§ 89.1 Applicability and requirements. ( a ) This regulation applies to all recipients unless they are exempted from the policy requirement by the Leadership Act or other statute.
( b ) The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) components shall include in the public announcement of the availability of the grant, cooperative agreement, contract, or other funding instrument involving Leadership Act HIV/AIDS funds the requirement that recipients agree that they are opposed to the practices of prostitution and sex trafficking because of the psychological and physical risks they pose for women, men, and children. This requirement shall also be included in the award documents for any grant, cooperative agreement or other funding instrument involving Leadership Act HIV/AIDS funds entered into with the recipient.
EXHIBIT 8


                          List of Subsidiaries:

  Name of Subsidiary                               Place of Incorporation
  ------------------                               ----------------------
  VocalTec Communications Inc.                     Delaware
  VocalTec Communications Japan KK                 Japan
  VocalTec Communications Deutschland GmbH         Germany
  TrulyGlobal Inc.                                 Delaware
  VocalTec Communications Hong Kong Limited        Hong Kong
  VocalTec Communications International B.V.       Netherlands
  VocalTec Communications Italy S.r.l.             Italy
  VocalTec Communications Australia Pty Ltd.       Australia
  VocalTec Communications Singapore Pte Ltd.       Singapore
  VocalTec Communications France SAS               France
  VocalTec Communications Spain S.L.               Spain
  VocalTec Communications Sweden AB                Sweden
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

SPEECHNOW.ORG, ) 

DAVID KEATING, ) 

FRED M. YOUNG, JR., ) 

EDWARD H. CRANE, III, ) 

BRAD RUSSO, and ) 

SCOTT BURKHARDT ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil Case No. 1:08-cv-00248 (JR) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

____________________________________) 

_______________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING FEC’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT 

_______________________________________________________

The Court, upon consideration of the submissions of the parties, hereby denies 

Defendant Federal Election Commission’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment. 

SO ORDERED this ____ day of ________________, 2010. 

 ____________________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Case 1:08-cv-00248-JDB Document 82 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Instrumentation and Systems Development Study Section, February 12, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to February 14, 2007, 5 p.m., Marriott Courtyard, 13480 Maxella Avenue, Marina Del Rey, CA, 90043 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 14, 2006, 71 FR 75266-75268.                

The meeting will be held February 12, 2007, to February 13, 2007. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: December 21, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9949 Filed 12-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BENJAMIN BLUMAN et al., :

: Civil Action No.: 10-1766 (RMU)

Plaintiffs, :

: Re Document No.: 2

v. :

:

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION

FOR A THREE-JUDGE COURT

For the reasons stated in the court’s Memorandum Opinion separately and 

contemporaneously issued this 7th day of January, 2011, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ application for a three-judge court is GRANTED in Part 

and DENIED in part.

SO ORDERED. 

 RICARDO M. URBINA

United States District Judge 

Case 1:10-cv-01766-RMU Document 17 Filed 01/07/11 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Health  Express USA, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended  September 29,
2002, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the  capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to his
knowledge:

              1. The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operation of Health
Express.


Date:    June 20, 2003                      By:      /s/ Patricia Durante
                                               --------------------------------
                                                     Patricia Durante
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CLAYMONT STEEL HOLDINGS, INC.



---

CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



---

Each of the undersigned, Jeff
Bradley, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Claymont Steel Holdings, Inc. (the Company), and David Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 2, 2007



/s/ Jeff BradleyJeff BradleyChief Executive Officerand Director/s/ David ClarkDavid ClarkChief Financial Officer
# National Day of Mourning for Gerald R. Ford

As a further mark of respect to the memory of Gerald R. Ford, the thirty-eighth President of the United States, 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, in honor and tribute to the memory of Gerald R. Ford, and as an expression of public sorrow, do appoint Tuesday, January 2, 2007, as a National Day of Mourning throughout the United States. I call on the American people to assemble on that day in their respective places of worship, there to pay homage to the memory of President Ford. I invite the people of the world who share our grief to join us in this solemn observance. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of December in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-9992

Billing code 3195-01-P
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Pauline Schneider, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report: 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 18, 2006  /s/ Pauline Schneider Pauline Schneider Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
125 STAT. 400 PUBLIC LAW 112–39—OCT. 12, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1632: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

June 21, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 4, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–39 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5014 Gary 

Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant 

Chris Davis Post Office’’. 

Approved October 12, 2011. 

Oct. 12, 2011 

[H.R. 1632] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
Case 1:07-cv-01674-DDD-JDK Document 11 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01674-DDD-JDK Document 11 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-01674-DDD-JDK Document 11 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 3 of 3