alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tsippy Moldovan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Tsippy Moldovan
  Chief Financial Officer




August 15, 2010
#### § 2523.40 For what purposes should Federal agencies use AmeriCorps program funds?

AmeriCorps funds should enable Federal agencies to establish programs that leverage agencies' existing resources and grant-making powers toward the goal of integrating service more fully into agencies' programs and activities. Agencies should plan to ultimately support new service initiatives out of their own budgets and appropriations.
§ 810.6 Exemptions. ( a ) The Freedom of Information Act exempts from disclosure nine categories of records which are described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
( b ) When a request encompasses records which would be of concern to or which have been created primarily by another Federal agency, the record will be made available by the Council only if the document was created primarily to meet the requirements of the Council's regulations implementing section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act or other provisions of law administered primarily by the Council. If the record consists primarily of materials submitted by State or local governments, private individuals, organizations, or corporations, to another Federal agency in fulfillment of requirements for receiving assistance, permits, licenses, or approvals from the agency, the Council may refer the request to that agency. The requester shall be notified in writing of the referral.
----

| 1. | The Report duly complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Jason Walsh                                                  |   | Date:  September 24, 2012 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Jason Walsh                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |                                |   |
| Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |                                |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75260-75261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 75261]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Genetics Research Project.
    Date: February 20, 2007.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mark Roltsch, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7192, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0285. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0a2bfbca4a3b3b8bd90bdb1b9bcfebeb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4968b889097878c89a489858d88ca8a8d8cca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Investigator and Research Scientist 
Development Awards (KO2 & KO8's).
    Date: February 22-23, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 1800 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Rina Das, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Review Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 7200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0297, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9bdb8aaabeb99b7b1b0bbb0f7b7b0b1f7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1a5a0b2b3f381afa9a8a3a8efafa8a9efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)
    Dated: December 8, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9703 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1055

___________ Michael Pride, Sr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, * a New York Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 5, 2001 Filed: April 10, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Pride, an African-American male, appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of

summary judgment, and its denial of his motion for reconsideration, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 action against his former employer, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife). After de novo review, see Lynn v. Deaconess Med. Ctr.-W. Campus , 160 F.3d 484, 486 (8th Cir. 1998), we conclude the district court (1) properly granted summary judgment for the reasons stated in its order, see Dennis v.2–

Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc. , 207 F.3d 523, 525 (8th Cir. 2000) (denial of leave to amend under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)); Ghane v. West , 148 F.3d 979, 981-83 (8th Cir. 1998) (discrimination analysis); (2) did not err in striking portions of Pride’s affidavit and exhibits, see El Deeb v. Univ. of Minn. , 60 F.3d 423, 428-29 (8th Cir. 1995) (affidavits opposing summary judgment motion shall be made on personal knowledge, set forth such facts as would be admissible, and show affirmatively affiant is competent to testify); and (3) did not abuse its discretion in denying Pride’s motion for reconsideration, see Sanders v. Clemco Indus. , 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We grant MetLife’s motion to strike portions of Pride’s submission on appeal. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 75.102 Exceptions. ( a ) With the exception of subpart F of this part, OMB may allow exceptions for classes of Federal awards or non-Federal entities subject to the requirements of this part when exceptions are not prohibited by statute. However, in the interest of maximum uniformity, exceptions from the requirements of this part will be permitted only in unusual circumstances. Exceptions for classes of Federal awards or non-Federal entities will be published on the OMB Web site at *www.whitehouse.gov/omb*.
( b ) Exceptions on a case-by-case basis for individual non-Federal entities may be authorized by the HHS awarding agency or cognizant agency for indirect costs, except where otherwise required by law or where OMB or other approval is expressly required by this part.
( c ) The HHS awarding agency may apply more restrictive requirements to a class of Federal awards or non-Federal entities when approved by OMB, or when required by Federal statutes or regulations, except for the requirements in subpart F of this part. An HHS awarding agency may apply less restrictive requirements when making fixed amount awards as defined in subpart A of this part, except for those requirements imposed by statute or in subpart F of this part.
( d ) On a case-by-case basis, OMB will approve new strategies for Federal awards when proposed by the HHS awarding agency in accordance with OMB guidance (such as M-13-17) to develop additional evidence relevant to addressing important policy challenges or to promote cost-effectiveness in and across Federal programs. Proposals may draw on the innovative program designs discussed in M-13-17 to expand or improve the use of effective practices in delivering Federal financial assistance while also encouraging innovation in service delivery. Proposals submitted to OMB in accordance with M-13-17 may include requests to waive requirements other than those in subpart F of this part.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3014, Jan. 20, 2016]
Exhibit 10.16


 


 


 


 





Supply and marketing contracts


Supplier: heze zonghoo jianyuan biotech co.,ltd


Buyer: baofeng biotech (beijing) co.,ltd


Contract no.: ZH190410K041B


 


Signing place: here


 


1、The table shows the product name、quantity、price
and total amount.


	No.	Product Name	Quantity (capsule)	Price (yuan/box)	Total Amount
	1	LIFE’S NA-NERVONIC ACID CANDY	200000	11	110000
	2	OTHER FEE	 	 	17
	TOTAL	   ¥   110017  YUAN     	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 


 


2. Quality standards. The supplier shall meet
the standards of the People's Republic of China and ensure product quality.


3. Packaging requirements: the specific packaging
requirements shall conform to the national standards.


Place and method of delivery: the place designated
by the customer


4. Mode of transportation, arrival and expenses:
the freight shall be borne by the buyer.


5. Price and payment method: within three working
days from the date of signing the contract (2019-4-10), the deposit of 50% of the product shall be 43,050 yuan and the cost of
all packaging materials shall be 23,917 yuan, and the rest of the payment of 43,050 yuan shall be paid before delivery.


6. Place and method of acceptance: the supplier's
factory shall conduct inspection, and attach the quality inspection report and the third-party inspection report. If the buyer
has any objection, it shall raise it within 7 days after it arrives at the factory.


7.Liability for breach of contract: if either
party is unable to perform this contract due to force majeure, it shall promptly notify the other party and provide a certificate
issued by the relevant authority within a reasonable period of time. Other conditions shall be subject to the relevant provisions
of the contract law of the People's Republic of China.


8. If this contract cannot be performed or needs
to be modified during the execution for any reason, it shall be valid only if both parties agree to exchange notes or make another
contract. In case of any dispute, both parties may negotiate for settlement. If the negotiation is not satisfactory, either party
may resort to the people's court where the contract is signed.


9.Facsimile copies of supply and marketing contracts
are valid.
#### § 411.54 Third-party reporting.

ORR must establish a method to receive third-party reports of sexual abuse and sexual harassment and must make available to the public information on how to report sexual abuse and sexual harassment on behalf of a UC.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7703

MICHAEL HAAS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JACK LEE, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-572-3) Submitted: March 26, 2004 Decided: April 13, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Robert Gerson, ROBINSON & GERSON, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Haas seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition as untimely filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Haas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lawrence L. Bartlett,  the Principal  Financial Officer of Amnis Systems Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the  fiscal
         quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: November 13, 2003

/S/ LAWRENCE L. BARTLETT
----------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence L. Bartlett
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Primus *v.*Macon Railway & Light Company.

Submitted July 18,

Decided November 10, 1906.

Action for damages. Before Judge Iiodges. City court of Macon. September 27, 1905.

*Glawson & Fowler,*for plaintiff,

cited (besides cases cited in the-foregoing decision) : Civil Code, §§2320-21, 3816; 79 *Ga.*461; 53 L. R. A. 330; 112 Pa. St. 551 (4 Atl. 485).

*Boland Filis,*for defendant,

cited: Civil Code, § 3817; *Ga.*R. 121/486; 114/762; 113/9, 1105; 110/223, 230; 97/56; 96/328; 94/124; 46/448; 122/854; 117/451(4), 767; 98/751; 69/268; 118/340; 122/561-2.

Eish, O. J.

In. an action against a street-railway company the *petition,*in substance, alleged, that within a month prior to the filing of the suit, and. at a stated place in the county of defendant’s domicile, plaintiff’s minor child was wantonly pushed from a moving ear on defendant’s line of road by a person who at the time was “in the employment and service of the defendant company on that car, thereby causing the child to fall upon defendant’s track and the car to run over and crush his leg.” The child’s life expectancy, and his earning capacity and the diminution thereof by reason of the injury, and the amount of damages sustained by the plaintiff, were alleged. *Held,*that a cause of action was set forth, and it was error to dismiss the petition on general demurrer. *Lindsay*v. *R. Co.,*46 *Ga.*448; *Central Railroad*v. *Smith,*69 *Ga.*268 (2) ; *Smith*v. *Railway Co.,*100 *Ga.*96; *Brunswick Railroad*Co. v. *Bostwick,*Ib. 96; *Savannah Ry. Co.*v. *Godkin,*104 *Ga.*655 (1).

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices*concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40623 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARMANDO CASTILLO-BUSTAMANTE, also known as Jorge Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-23-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Armando Castillo-Bustamante (Castillo) pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been deported and after having been convicted of an “aggravated felony,” a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court sentenced him to an 18-month prison term and to two years of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Castillo argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey ,No. 04-40623 -2- 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated-felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Castillo concedes, this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and Almendarez-Torres was not overruled by Apprendi

. See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Castillo also argues that the Supreme Court’s holding in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), should be applied to sentences determined under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), but he raises it to preserve it for possible further review.
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

LAURA HOLMES, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-1243 (RMC)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

)

)

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued simultaneously with this Order, it is 

hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Regarding Certification [Dkt. 25] is 

DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Federal Election Commission’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 27] is GRANTED; and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Federal 

Election Commission.

This is a final appealable order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). This case is closed. 

Date: April 20, 2015

 /s/ 

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER

United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-01243-RMC Document 34 Filed 04/20/15 Page 1 of 1
#### § 400.312 Opportunity to apply for services.

A State must provide any individual wishing to do so an opportunity to apply for targeted assistance services and determine the eligibility of each applicant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Language and Communication Study Section, February 15, 2007, 7:30 a.m. to February 15, 2007, 6:30 p.m., Crowne Plaza Union Square, 480 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94108 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 14, 2006, 71 FR 75266-75268.                

The meeting will be held February 15, 2007, 8 a.m. to February 16, 2007, 5 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: December 21, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9954 Filed 12-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M