alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7229-7230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3195]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7794]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Nomads and Networks: The Ancient Art and Culture of 
Kazakhstan''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Nomads and Networks: The Ancient Art and 
Culture of Kazakhstan,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, 
New York University, New York, New York, from on or about March 6, 
2012, until on or about June 3, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public

[[Page 7230]]

Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 6, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-3195 Filed 2-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AgroCan  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl
Yuen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Carl  Yuen


Carl  Yuen
Chief  Financial  Officer
August  14,  2002


                                       19
<PAGE>
#### § 79.45 Deposit in Treasury of United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3806(g).
---

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brad Jacoby, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for GIC and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of GIC's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in GIC's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during GIC's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, GIC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. GIC's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect GIC's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in GIC's internal control over financial reporting,

|Date: March 14, 2008 | /s/    BRAD JACOBY     
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Brad Jacoby            
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1578

ALBERT GREEN, JR.; EPHONIA M. GREEN , Plaintiffs

- Appellants , and
IDA M. GREEN , Plaintiff,

v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC; CARRIE M. WARD; JOSEPH DELOZIER , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv
- 03207

- PJM )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Albert Green, Jr. , Ephonia M. Green , Appellants Pro Se. Matthew Daniel Cohen , BWW LAW GROUP, LLC , Rockvill e, Maryland, for Appellees

.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Appellants, Albert Green, Jr., and Ephonia M. Green, appeal the district court’s
order dismissing their complaint alleging that a law firm and attorn eys who worked for
the law firm violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act , 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692

- 1692p (2012), in regard to a state foreclosure proceeding. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants ’ brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, the Appellants have forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
§ 500.3 Fees. ( a ) The amount of attorney's fees that may be charged in connection with claims falling within the purview of title I of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 1621-1627), is governed by the provisions of 22 U.S.C.1623(f).
( b ) The amount of attorney's fees that may be charged in connection with claims falling within the purview of subchapter B of this chapter is governed by the provisions of section 10 of the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2009).
( c ) The amount of attorney's fees that may be charged in connection with claims falling within the purview of subchapter D of this chapter is governed by the provisions of section 1705(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Title XVII, Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act, Public Law 114-328.
[66 FR 49844, Oct. 1, 2001, as amended at 82 FR 16126, Apr. 3, 2017]
§ 501.3 Service of process. ( a ) *By whom served.* The Commission will serve all orders, notices and other papers issued by it, together with any other papers which it is required by law to serve.
( b ) *Kinds of service.* Subpoenas, orders, rulings, and other processes of the Commission may be served by delivering in person, by registered or certified mail, by overnight express delivery service, by first class mail, by telegraph, or by publication.
( c ) *Personal service.* Service by delivering in person may be accomplished by: ( 1 ) Delivering a copy of the document to the person to be served, to a member of the partnership to be served, to an executive officer or a director of the corporation to be served, or to a person competent to accept service; or
( 2 ) By leaving a copy thereof at the residence, principal office or place of business of the person, partnership, or corporation.
( 3 ) Proof of service. The return receipt for the order, other process or supporting papers, or the verification by the person serving, setting forth the manner of service, will be proof of the service of the document.
( 4 ) Service upon attorney or agent. When any party has appeared by an authorized attorney or agent, service upon the party's attorney or agent will be deemed service upon the party.
( d ) *Service by registered mail or certified mail.* Service by registered mail or certified mail will be regarded as complete on the date the return post office receipt for the orders, notices and other papers is received by the Commission.
( e ) *Service by overnight express delivery service or by first class mail.* Service by overnight express delivery service or first class mail will be regarded as complete upon deposit, respectively, in the delivery service's package receptacle or in the United States mail properly stamped and addressed.
( f ) *Service by telegraph.* Service by telegraph will be regarded as complete when deposited with a telegraph company properly addressed and with charges prepaid.
( g ) *Service by publication.* Service by publication is completed when due notice has been given in the publication for the time and in the manner provided by law or rule.
( h ) *Date of service.* The date of service is the day upon which the document is deposited in the United States mail or delivered in person, as the case may be.
( i ) *Filing with Commission.* Papers required to be filed with the Commission will be deemed filed upon actual receipt by the Commission accompanied by proof of service upon parties required to be served. Upon the actual receipt, the filing will be deemed complete as of the date of deposit in the mail or with the telegraph company as provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean L. Julia, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ace Marketing &
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: November 13, 2006                 /S/ DEAN L. JULIA
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        DEAN L. JULIA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
; PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TODD, CASS, AND MORRISON COUNTIES STEERING COMMITTEE AND THE

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY — L = MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES _WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 83-4156 ‘PLATE 2

40° 35’ : 30° 25° 94°20"
R. 34 W. R. 31W. R. 31W. R. 30]W. fh. 30 W. R.29 W.
- Sa ened lame a > | nem alia ee 3 alsin 2A

a ae a ea igor 3

T. 134 N

[
|
+ |
4
i:
|
i |
1
4 be 3 a
ri Fit3
vf € Xe a
4 = Natt
. =. el i +
+ be 4% f . ‘Stump ats
95°00" 7 t Ga a : oe 1” ronbist
| 2.33, W. R. 32 W. e 3 rt t ;

I
oe

* op

per

2 Pa
wae pee

ww,

r =| +
- 7 3
Ea) at ° \8.. BP i AJIL
ie ” ‘ ay j a
. STE Ra | Buck Lakel ai NSeanchfeld |
rh in — ae PRAIRI
4 é s

Pee ee
ribet eeted hee

T. 132 N. |

i MELITARY,
prep te

n
RESERVATION

(3 te tigs U,,6 vHe-*
¢ San Om oe ee Dot Pee
T.130.N. or ER? Okan

; s 4 b

1 ae . 24

af ;

1.

s'—

* T. 130 N.
Ge 1.129 N.
EXPLANATION
46°00"
f LINE OF EQUAL TRANSMISSIVITY-- —
3 —10,000— Interval 5000 and 10,000 feet squared
5 per day
Wes ae a SAND-PLAIN BOUNDARY--Dashed
¥ Z —— — where sand plain continues beyond
pe “ study area
ay Gacharies a fe
Tr cy eather x ar Study area
Oo 2 4 6 MILES
LLL an 7 :
° 2 4 6 8 KILOMETERS
en mfansmant
JU ER
Miley a a Bh
ae Oe ‘
T. 128 N.
ST. 127 N.
45°50"
Twn! — tt - a 1.127 N
R R35 W. RSW. R. 34.W. R. 33 W. T R.33.W. R. 32 R31W. R30 W. R29 W.

95°00" 65" 50° 45 40° so"
Base from Minnesota Department of Highways
General Highway Maps of Cass, Morrison,

and Todd Counties, 1977

PLATE 2.--TRANSMISSIVITY OF THE SURFICIAL OUTWASH
#### Helic Trembly, *as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v.*Gouverneur Pulp Company, *Respondent*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mem. by

Landon, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of an EA and FONSI/ROD executed by MDOT and the FAA for the evaluation of environmental impacts associated with proposed airport improvements for the Jackson County Airport located in Jackson, Michigan. 

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is making available an EA and FONSI/ROD for the evaluation of environmental impacts associated with proposed improvements to the Jackson County Airport located in Jackson, Michigan. The proposed improvements include the relocation of Runway 6/24 and the shift and extension of Runway 14/32.

# *Point of Contact*:                    

Mr. Brad Davidson, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA Great Lakes Region, Detroit Airports District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, MI 48174, (734) 229-2900.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FAA is making available an EA and FONSI/ROD for the evaluation of environmental impacts associated with proposed airport improvements, executed by MDOT and the FAA, for the Jackson County Airport located in Jackson, Michigan. The purpose of the EA and FONSI/ROD was to evaluate potential environmental impacts arising from the proposed airport improvement project involving the relocation of Runway 06/24 and a shift and extension to Runway 14/32.

These documents will be available during normal business hours at the following location: FAA Detroit Airports District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, MI 48174.

Due to current security requirements, arrangements must be made with the point of contact prior to visiting this office.

Issued in Detroit, Michigan, December 13, 2006. 

Irene R. Porter, 

Manager, Detroit Airport District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.

[FR Doc. 06-9941 Filed 12-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### § 307.20 Submittal of advance planning documents for computerized support enforcement systems.

The State IV-D agency must submit an APD for a computerized support enforcement system, approved and signed by the State IV-D Director and the appropriate State official, in accordance with the submission process prescribed in 45 CFR part 95, subpart F.

[55 FR 4379, Feb. 7, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 47005, Oct. 14, 1992]
§ 75.459 Professional service costs. ( a ) Costs of professional and consultant services rendered by persons who are members of a particular profession or possess a special skill, and who are not officers or employees of the non-Federal entity, are allowable, subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section when reasonable in relation to the services rendered and when not contingent upon recovery of the costs from the Federal Government. In addition, legal and related services are limited under § 75.435.
( b ) In determining the allowability of costs in a particular case, no single factor or any special combination of factors is necessarily determinative. However, the following factors are relevant: ( 1 ) The nature and scope of the service rendered in relation to the service required.
( 2 ) The necessity of contracting for the service, considering the non-Federal entity's capability in the particular area.
( 3 ) The past pattern of such costs, particularly in the years prior to Federal awards.
( 4 ) The impact of Federal awards on the non-Federal entity's business (*i.e.,* what new problems have arisen).
( 5 ) Whether the proportion of Federal work to the non-Federal entity's total business is such as to influence the non-Federal entity in favor of incurring the cost, particularly where the services rendered are not of a continuing nature and have little relationship to work under Federal awards.
( 6 ) Whether the service can be performed more economically by direct employment rather than contracting.
( 7 ) The qualifications of the individual or concern rendering the service and the customary fees charged, especially on non-federally funded activities.
( 8 ) Adequacy of the contractual agreement for the service (*e.g.,* description of the service, estimate of time required, rate of compensation, and termination provisions).
( c ) In addition to the factors in paragraph (b) of this section, to be allowable, retainer fees must be supported by evidence of bona fide services available or rendered.
§ 650.9 Unwanted inventions. ( a ) The Foundation will normally allow any patent rights not wanted by the awardee or inventor to be dedicated to the public through publication in scientific and engineering journals or as a statutory invention registration under section 157 of title 35 of the United States Code. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the NSF Patent Assistant will acknowledge a negative election by encouraging the awardee and inventor to promptly make all research results available to the scientific and engineering community.
( b ) If the NSF Patent Assistant believes that another Federal agency is interested in the relevant technology, he or she may, after receiving the awardee's election not to patent and ascertaining that the inventor also does not want to patent, send a copy of the invention disclosure to that agency to give it an opportunity to review and patent the invention. Unless the agency expresses an interest in the invention within thirty days, the Patent Assistant will acknowledge the awardee's negative election by encouraging prompt publication of all research results. If the agency does express an interest in patenting the invention, the Patent Assistant will transfer to it all rights to the invention.