alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34 (k)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

* Ernst & Young LLP
  220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400
  Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

* Phone: (612) 343-1000
  www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i),
1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(i) through 1122 (d)(2)(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i)
through 1122 (d)(3)(iv), and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them
with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 26, 2007

A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
#### § 80.11 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.

(Sec. 603, 78 Stat. 253, (42 U.S.C. 2000d-2))

[29 FR 16298, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 32 FR 14556, Oct. 19, 1967]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

HERRON FOR CONGRESS, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 11-1466 (RC) 

 : 

 v. : Re Document Nos.: 15, 17 

 : 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER 

DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING THE FEDERAL 

ELECTION COMMISSION’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the court’s Memorandum Opinion separately issued this 8th day 

of November, 2012, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Election Commission’s cross-motion for 

summary judgment is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED. 

 RUDOLPH CONTRERAS 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-01466-RC Document 23 Filed 11/08/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


June 9, 2020


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2017


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2017 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-237254 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements 
</LEGEND>
                     
                     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         145,845
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,526,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    5,170,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,378,275
<PP&E>                                         3,638,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,481,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,341,743
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,638,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,481,627
<SALES>                                        26,139,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          17,092,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,522,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               33,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                167,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                   18,999
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            148,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6962
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL TRACY HARMON, a/k/a Mike, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13) Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Tracy Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Tracy Harmon appeals the district court’s orders denying Harmon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), and Harmon’s motions for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and affirm the denial of the underlying order for the reasons stated by the district court. In addition, we find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in denying the motions for reconsideration. United States v. Williams , 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. United States v. Harmon , No. 2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13 (E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2006; April 19, 2006; May 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 108.665 Appliances for watertight integrity.

Each watertight door, scuttle, and hatch required for watertight integrity, which may be opened during normal operations must be marked in letters of contrasting color to the background “KEEP CLOSED”.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Gerald Vento, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of magicJack VocalTec Ltd.; and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


By: /s/ Gerald Vento

Gerald Vento

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)




Date: April 30, 2015
§ 96.86 Exemption from requirement for additional outreach and intake services. The requirement in section 2605(b)(15) of Public Law 97-35 (42 U.S.C. 8624(b)(15)), as amended by section 704(a)(4) of the Augustus F. Hawkins Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-501)—concerning additional outreach and intake services—does not apply to: ( a ) Indian tribes and tribal organizations; and
( b ) Territories whose annual LIHEAP allotments under section 2602(b) of Public Law 97-35 (42 U.S.C. 8621(b)) are $200,000 or less.
[57 FR 1978, Jan. 16, 1992]
# Did You Feel It?

  Did You Feel It? (DYFI) collects information from people who felt an  earthquake and creates maps that show what people experienced and the extent of damage.

## Report it Here - Tell Us!

Find the earthquake you felt, and then tell us about it. Not in the list?                  Report an Unknown Event          

### DYFI, Past 24 Hours

view          the raw data here

### View Map and List of Felt Events

        -  Past 24 Hours 
        -  Past 7 Days 
        -  Past 30 Days         

## Search and View Past Earthquakes

        -  Search DYFI Archives  This search is configured to return only events with DYFI products. You may enter additional search parameters for magnitude threshold, time window, and geographic area. 
        -  Annual Data Viewer  Cumulative and yearly response maps for earthquakes in the        U.S. and around the world using an interactive map. Export a map view using the printer icon in top left corner of map.         
        -  FAQ  Questions and answers about Did You Feel It? (updated May 24, 2022) 
        -  Scientific Background            Explore our collection of citizen science data, report your experience of an earthquake, or learn more about this citizen science project - how it's done, how you can contribute, and what we do with your data.         

Questions or comments?

Facebook
Twitter
Google
Email
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 The
        undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Pinel Bay Corporation
        (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
        purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on
        Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended July 31, 2007 fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
        all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
        James B. Wiegand______________
 James
        B.
        Wiegand
 Principal
        Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
  October
        17, 2007
#### § 73.735-1007 Political activity.

Consultants who serve intermittently are subject to the political activity restrictions of Subchapter III of Chapter 73 of Title 5 U.S.C. and Civil Service Rule IV only on days on which service is rendered and then for the entire 24 hours of such service day. Other consultants are subject to these restrictions at all times.
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Dimitri J.Andritsoyiannis, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                 The Company’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have;

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;

b)              omitted;

c)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d)              omitted; and

5.                 The Company’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

| Date:   May 30,  2007          |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Dimitri  J. Andritsoyiannis          |   |
| Dimitri J.  Andritsoyiannis                   |
| *Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
§ 98.101 Case Review Methodology. ( a ) *Case Reviews and Sampling* —In preparing the error reports required by this subpart, States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico shall conduct comprehensive reviews of case records using a methodology established by the Secretary. For purposes of the case reviews, States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico shall select a random sample of case records which is estimated to achieve the calculation of an estimated annual amount of improper payments with a 90 percent confidence interval of ±5.0 percent.
( b ) *Methodology and Forms* —States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico must prepare and submit forms issued by the Secretary, following the accompanying instructions setting forth the methodology to be used in conducting case reviews and calculating the error rates.
( c ) *Reporting Frequency and Cycle* —States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico shall conduct case reviews and submit error rate reports to the Department according to a staggered three-year cycle established by the Secretary such that each State, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico will be selected once, and only once, in every three years.
( d ) *Access to Federal Staff* —States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico must provide access to Federal staff to participate and provide oversight in case reviews and error rate calculations, including access to forms related to determining error rates.
( e ) *Record Retention* —Records pertinent to the case reviews and submission of error rate reports shall be retained for a period of five years from the date of submission of the applicable error rate report or, if the error rate report was revised, from the date of submission of the revision. Records must be made available to Federal staff upon request.
§ 410.1000 Scope of this part. ( a ) This part governs those aspects of the placement, care, and services provided to unaccompanied children in Federal custody by reason of their immigration status and referred to the Unaccompanied Children Program (UC Program) as authorized by section 462 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, 6 U.S.C. 279, and section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA), Public Law 110-457, 8 U.S.C. 1232. This part includes provisions implementing the settlement agreement reached in *Jenny Lisette Flores* v. *Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States,* Case No. CV 85-4544-RJK (C.D. Cal. 1996).
( b ) The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.
( c ) ORR does not fund or operate facilities other than standard programs, restrictive placements (which includes secure facilities, including residential treatment centers, and heightened supervision facilities), or emergency or influx facilities, absent a specific waiver as described under § 410.1801(d) or such additional waivers as are permitted by law.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-718 

________________________________________________________________________ 

PEACE CORPS 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and RWANDA 

Signed at Kigali July 18, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 RWANDA 

 Peace Corps 

Agreement signed at Kigali July 18, 2008; 

 Entered into force July 18, 2008.
---

---

EXHIBIT 11

# Statement of Computation
of Earnings per Share

Following is the data relating to the
weighted average number of shares used in the computation of diluted earning (loss) per
share:

|                                                                     | Year ended December 31,2006 | Year ended December 31,2005
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Weighted  average number of shares used in the  computation of basic |                             |                            
|earning (loss) per share                                             |                             |                            
|                                                                     |                             |                            
|Add: Net additional  shares from the  anticipated  exercise of stock |                             |                            
|options                                                              |                             |                            
|                                                                     |                             |                            
|Weighted  average number of shares used in the  computation of basic |                             |                            
|earning (loss) per share                                             |                             |                            
|                                                                     |                             |                            
|                                                                     |                             |                            
|Options  which  were not  included  in the  computation  of  diluted |                             |                            
|earning (loss) per share due to anti dilutive effect                 |                             |                            
|                                                                     |                             |                            



---

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44441-44442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board; Meeting: Correction

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal 
Register on July 18, 2014, a notice of an open meeting for the 
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB). The notice is being 
corrected to change the Agenda topics and point of contact for the 
meeting.
    Correction: In the Federal Register of July 18, 2014, in FR DOC. 
2014--16910, on pages 42001, please make the following corrections:
    In the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT heading, first column, first 
paragraph, first line, please remove, ``Karen Gibson, Designated 
Federal Officer'' ``telephone: (202) 586-3787'' and in its place add 
``Corey Williams-Allen, Deputy Designated Federal Officer'' 
``telephone: (202) 586-1916''.
    In the Tentative Agenda heading, first column, first paragraph, 
fourth line,

[[Page 44442]]

please remove, ``SEAB Next Generation High Performance Computing Task 
Force'' and in its place add, ``SEAB Task Force on Nuclear 
Nonproliferation''.
    In the Public Participation heading, second column, first 
paragraph, second line, please remove, ``Karen Gibson'' and in its 
place add, ``Corey Williams-Allen''. Also in the fifth line, remove 
``five days'', and in its place add'' one day''.
    In the Minutes heading, second column, first paragraph, second 
line, please remove ``Ms. Gibson. She'', and in its place add, ``Mr. 
Williams-Allen. He''.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on: July 28, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-18034 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```