alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Request for Informatio n Eagle Vision Drones LLC (FAA-2015-3841) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Hartpence: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3841). This information is necessary for the Fede ral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by January 4, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Monday , December 21, 2015 9:28 AM To: admin@eaglevisiondrones.com
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: December 4, 2014 5 18928

________________________________ In the Matter of GENARO CAMPOS, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANDREA EVANS, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 21, 2014 Before: Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Genaro Campos, Yonkers, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ferreira, J.), entered May 9, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release. After his request for parole release was denied in September 2012, petitioner commenced the present CPLR article 78 proceeding. He now appeals from Supreme Court's dismissal of the petition. Petitioner reappeared before the Board of Parole in August 2014, however, and was granted an open release date. Thus, the appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Irving v Evans, 120 AD3d 1502, 1502 [2014]; Matter of Clark v Evans, 113 AD3d 973, 973 [2014]).-2- 518928

Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 1 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 2 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 3 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 4 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 5 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 6 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 7 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 8 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 9 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 10 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 11 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 12 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 13 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 14 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 15 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 16 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 17 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 18 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 19 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 20 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 21 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 22 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 23 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 24 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 25 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 26 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 27 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 28 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 29 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 30 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 31 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 32 of 33

Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC   Document 1   Filed 08/20/14   Page 33 of 33
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Current Report of Mobile Reach International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Joyce, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                            /s/  Charles Joyce
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Charles Joyce
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 June 15th, 2004
EXHIBIT 32-2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries
International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Tsippy Moldovan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/S/ Tsippy Moldovan*
-----------------------
Tsippy Moldovan
Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2004

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
§ 2524.20 What are the guidelines for program development assistance and training grants? ( a ) *Eligibility.* States, Federal agencies, Indian tribes, public or private nonprofit agencies, institutions of higher education, for-profit businesses, and individuals may apply for assistance under this section.
( b ) *Duration.* A grant made under this section will be for a term of up to one year and is renewable.
( c ) *Application requirements.* Eligible applicants must comply with the requirements specified in the Corporation's application package.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Contributions from the UnitedStates National Herbarium**
 
 
Volumes:
39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55
56 | 57
 
SuDoc Number:A 6.5: | SI 3.8:
Item Number:0921-A-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000760814
 
December 2, 2019
# Party Table 7

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was published on 4/3/15.
#### § 400.69 Alternative RCA programs.

A State that determines that a public/private RCA program or a publicly-administered program modeled after its TANF program is not the best approach for the State may choose instead to establish an alternative approach under the Wilson/Fish program, authorized by section 412(e)(7) of the INA.
From: <Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> CC: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

, <Lassiter.Penny@epamail.epa.gov> Date: 4/13/2011 9:34 PM Subject: RE: Revised PVC proposal package Attachments: E.O.12866PVCProposedRule20110413.doc

Christine,

Attached is the clean version of the PVC proposal package. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

Jodi

************************************************************ Jodi Howard, Environmental Engineer U.S. EPA - Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Program Divisions Refining and Chemicals Group Mail Code: E143-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-4607 Fax: 919-541-0246
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 

 ) 

DAVE LEVINTHAL, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 15-1148 (JEB) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) STIPULATION OF 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) DISMISSAL 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

 Plaintiffs, Dave Levinthal and the Center for Public Integrity, and defendant Federal 

Election Commission hereby jointly stipulate to the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal 

Rule Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each side to bear its own fees and costs. As a 

stipulation made pursuant to rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this dismissal is effective without court order. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Peter Newbatt Smith

Peter Newbatt Smith 

D.C. Bar #458244 

Center for Public Integrity 

910 17th Street, N.W., 7th Floor 

Washington, DC 20006-2606 

202-481-1239 

psmith@publicintegrity.org 

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 

March 25, 2016 

Daniel A. Petalas (D.C. Bar No. 467908) 

Acting General Counsel 

dpetalas@fec.gov 

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) 

Deputy General Counsel — Law 

lstevenson@fec.gov 

Kevin Deeley 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

kdeeley@fec.gov 

 

Erin Chlopak (D.C. Bar No. 496370) 

Acting Assistant General Counsel 

echlopak@fec.gov 

/s/ Greg J. Mueller 

Greg J. Mueller (D.C. Bar No. 462840) 

Attorney 

Case 1:15-cv-01148-JEB Document 17 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 2
2

gmueller@fec.gov 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

(202) 694-1650 

March 25, 2016 

Case 1:15-cv-01148-JEB Document 17 Filed 03/25/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1696 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1696

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
            Mid-Atlantic and North Atlantic planning areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2009

Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mr. Sires, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Rothman 
  of New Jersey, and Ms. Castor of Florida) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
            Mid-Atlantic and North Atlantic planning areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Ocean and Safe Tourism Anti-
Drilling Act'' or the ``COAST Anti-Drilling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease for the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural 
gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area; or
            ``(2) the North Atlantic planning area.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         161,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           8,180<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     343,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   399,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,295
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,962
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,537
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,425
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<FN>
<F1>THE BALANCE SHEET IS UNCLASSIFIED
<F2>PP&E IS SHOWN NET ON THE BALANCE SHEET.
<F3>INTEREST EXPENSE IS CONSIDERED AN OPERATING EXPENSE OF THE REGISTRANT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Rickida Morcomb 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Rollie Wilson <RWilson@nativelawgroup.com> 

Friday, December 10, 2021 12:15 PM

Audit 

Cc: Rickida Morcomb 

Subject:

Attachments: 

UtePAC DFAR Response and Hearing Requst

UtePAC Hrg Request and DFAR Response 12 7 21.pdf 

Hello,

Please find attached UtePAC’s timely filed response to the Draft Final Audit Report and request for a hearing before the

Federal Election Commission.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any other information. Thanks, Rollie

Rollie Wilson, Partner

601 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, South Bldg, Suite 900

Washington, D.C. 20004

Phone: 202‐340‐8232

Fax: 202‐639‐8238

www.nativelawgroup.com

This message, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may

contain confidential and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby

notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message

in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you.

1
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UTEPAC 

P.O. Box 190 

Fort Duchesne, Utah 84026 

December 7, 2021 

Via Email and U.S. Certified Mail 

Dayna C. Brown 

Audit Division Assistant Staff Director 

Federal Election Commission 

1050 First Street, NE 

Washington, D.C. 20463 

Email: audit@fec.gov; rlmorcomb@fec.gov 

RE: Hearing Request and Response to Draft Final Audit Report 

Dear Assistant Staff Director Brown: 

On November 22, 2021, UtePAC received the Federal Election Commission’s (FEC or 

Commission) Draft Final Audit Report (DFAR). As noted in your cover letter, UtePAC has until 

December 10, 2021, to request a hearing before the Commission. By this letter, UtePAC timely 

requests an in-person or remote hearing before the Commission. 

Request for Hearing 

A hearing is important in this case to help the Commission resolve significant and novel 

issues, as well as significant questions about the application of the law to the 

facts. In this case, the Ute Indian Tribe, a sovereign tribal government, established the first tribally 

led Political Action Committee, UtePAC, under FEC laws and regulations. The Tribe maintained 

rigorous financial controls in providing funding for UtePAC operations. In fact, the vast majority 

of funds involved in this case are the Tribe’s own funds provided for UtePAC operations. 

The Tribe also hired a Treasurer who claimed to have extensive experience operating 

Political Action Committees. The Tribe provided the Treasurer with funding for administrative, 

accounting, and legal support. Finally, when the Tribe became concerned about UtePAC 

operations, the Tribe conducted its own audit and compliance review of UtePAC. 

After learning of the FEC’s audit of UtePAC, the Tribe fired and replaced UtePAC’s 

Treasurer, directed its General Counsel to assist in the administration of UtePAC, and sought full 

compliance with FEC’s audit process. During the audit, UtePAC worked with FEC audit staff to 

legal
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 04-1330

GLORIA RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JO ANNE BARNHART,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Daniel R. Domínguez, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Selya, Lynch and Lipez,

Circuit Judges.

Salvador Medina de la Cruz on brief for appellant.

H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, Lisa E. Bhatia, Assistant

U.S. Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Regional Chief Counsel, and Lisa G.

Smoller, Assistant Regional Counsel, on brief for appellee.

September 21, 2004
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the record and

briefs on appeal, we affirm the judgment.

The appellant essentially argues that the ALJ should have

consulted a vocational expert before concluding that she was not

disabled, given her mental impairment. Under Ortiz v. Sec'y.

Health and Human Services, 890 F.2d 520, 526 (1

st Cir. 1989),

however, the ALJ could rely on the Grid alone if her mental

limitations were adequately accommodated by relegating her to

unskilled work. Given the record, the ALJ could reasonably

conclude that she could perform unskilled work. See Rodriguez v.

Sec'y. of Health and Human Servs., 647 F.2d 218, 222 (1st Cir.

1981).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Rule 27(c).

-2-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Switch & Data Facilities Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Keith Olsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 22, 2010



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KEITH OLSEN                                                           
|Keith Olsen                                                                  
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer)
#### § 500.6 Disqualification of former employees.

The provisions of 18 U.S.C. 207 shall govern the post-employment appearance of former Commission members, officers, and employees, including special Government employees, in the capacity of agent, attorney or representative on behalf of claimants before the Commission.