alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.03-55 Appeals from decisions or actions under subchapter M of this chapter. ( a ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action by a classification society or a third-party organization performing a survey under subchapter M of this chapter may, after requesting reconsideration of the decision or action by the classification society or third-party organization, make a formal appeal to the cognizant OCMI.
( b ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action by a classification society or a third-party organization performing an audit under subchapter M of this chapter may, after requesting reconsideration of the decision or action by the classification society or third-party organization, make a formal appeal to the District Commander of the district in which the audit was performed.
( c ) Any third-party organization or person from a third-party organization directly affected by a decision or action of the Coast Guard Towing Vessel National Center of Expertise (TVNCOE) may submit a formal appeal to Commandant (CG-CVC) for appeals of decisions by the TVNCOE related to subchapter M of this chapter.
( d ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action by an OCMI or District Commander may make a formal appeal pursuant to § 1.03-20 or § 1.03-25, respectively.
[USCG-2006-24412, 81 FR 40100, June 20, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

)

TEA PARTY LEADERSHIP FUND, )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1707 (RWR)

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The plaintiffs have filed a motion for a preliminary

injunction. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65,

“[b]efore . . . the hearing on a motion for a preliminary

injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and

consolidate it with the hearing.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2). 

This procedural device is designed to conserve judicial resources

and avoid duplicative proceedings. NOW v. Operation Rescue, 747

F. Supp. 760, 768 (D.D.C. 1990), modified, 816 F. Supp. 729

(D.D.C. 1993). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiffs and the defendant show cause in

writing by October 29, 2012 why the plaintiffs’ motion [1] for a

preliminary injunction should not be consolidated with a hearing

on the merits under Rule 65(a)(2). If the parties agree that the

hearings should be consolidated, the parties shall respond to

this Order by filing by the deadline a joint status report

Case 1:12-cv-01707-RWR Document 4 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

reflecting a proposed schedule on which full sequential summary

judgment briefing should proceed, supplanting the current

schedule to complete briefing on the pending motion for a

preliminary injunction.

SIGNED this 22nd day of October, 2012.

 /s/ 

RICHARD W. ROBERTS

United States District Judge

Case 1:12-cv-01707-RWR Document 4 Filed 10/22/12 Page 2 of 2
§ 900.106 Denali Commission responsibility. ( a ) The Federal Co-Chair or his/her designee shall designate an Approving Official for each Commission proposal, and shall provide environmental guidance to the Approving Official;
( b ) The Approving Official shall provide direction and guidance to the applicant as well as identification and development of required analyses and documentation;
( c ) The Approving Official shall make an independent evaluation of the environmental issues, take responsibility for the scope and content of the environmental document (EA or EIS), and make the environmental finding;
( d ) The Approving Official shall ensure mitigation measures included in environmental documents are implemented; and
( e ) The Approving official shall be responsible for coordinating communications with cooperating agencies and other federal agencies.
§ 605.14 Preemployment inquiries. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a recipient may not conduct a preemployment medical examination or may not make preemployment inquiry of an applicant as to whether the applicant is a handicapped person or as to the nature or severity of a handicap. A recipient may, however, make preemployment inquiry into an applicant's ability to perform job-related functions.
( b ) When a recipient is taking remedial action to correct the effects of past discrimination pursuant to § 605.6(a), when a recipient is taking voluntary action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in its federally assisted program or activity pursuant to § 605.6(b), or when a recipient is taking affirmative action pursuant to section 503 of the Act, the recipient may invite applicants for employment to indicate whether and to what extent they are handicapped, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The recipient states clearly on any written questionnaire used for this purpose or makes clear orally if no written questionnaire is used that the information requested is intended for use solely in connection with its remedial action obligations or its voluntary or affirmative action efforts; and
( 2 ) The recipient states clearly that the information is being requested on a voluntary basis, that it will be kept confidential as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, that refusal to provide it will not subject the applicant or employee to any adverse treatment, and that it will be used only in accordance with this part.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a recipient from conditioning an offer of employment on the results of a medical examination conducted prior to the employee's entrance on duty, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) All entering employees are subjected to such an examination regardless of handicap, and
( 2 ) the results of such an examination are used only in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( d ) Information obtained in accordance with this section as to the medical condition or history of the applicant shall be collected and maintained on separate forms that shall be accorded confidentiality as medical records, except that: ( 1 ) Supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of handicapped persons and regarding necessary accommodations;
( 2 ) First aid and safety personnel may be informed, where appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment; and
( 3 ) Government officials investigating compliance with the Act shall be provided relevant information upon request.
§ 614.7 Record vote. ( a ) For purposes of this part a vote of the National Science Board is a “record vote” if: ( 1 ) It carries by a majority of all those holding office as Board Members at the time of the vote;
( 2 ) No proxies are counted toward the necessary majority; and
( 3 ) The individual vote of each Member present and voting is recorded.
( b ) Within one day of any such record vote or any attempted record vote that fails to achieve the necessary majority under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Board Office will make publicly available a written record showing the vote of each Member on the question.
( c ) Within one day of any record vote under which any portion or portions of a Board meeting are to be closed to the public, the Board Office will make available a full written explanation of the Board's action and a list of all persons expected to attend the meeting, showing their affiliations.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 124

- C R

Appeal from the

384 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20100D06101 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until June 8 , 2016

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE STATE ’S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza

, the State ’s attorney, prepare the

Sta t e ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 8, 2016

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25 th day of April , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
#### § 73.735-504 Gifts to official superiors.

An employee shall not solicit a contribution from another employee for a gift to an official superior, make a donation as a gift to an official superior, or accept a gift from an employee receiving less pay than himself or herself. 5 U.S.C. 7351. This section does not prohibit a voluntary gift of nominal value or donation in nominal amount made on a special occasion such as marriage, illness or retirement.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

This Certifies That
                   -------------------------------------------------------------
is hereby issued                                                      fully paid
                 -----------------------------------------------------
and non-assessable Shares of the Stock of the above named Corporation
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be
hereunto affixed this                       day of            A.D.
                      ---------------------        ----------      -------------


     ---------------                            ----------------
         Secretary                                  President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         388,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,255,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,163,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,525,000
<PP&E>                                      80,179,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,695,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,165,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,828,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,787,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,165,000
<SALES>                                      6,199,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,199,000
<CGS>                                        3,808,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,131,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the September 30, 2003 Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands,
Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stan Paulus, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on my knowledge:

(i)      the Report, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit,
         fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and,

(ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.


Dated: November 18, 2003                    /s/ Stan Paulus
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Stan Paulus
                                           Chief Executive Officer
#### § 309.70 What provisions governing jurisdiction must a Tribe or Tribal organization include in a Tribal IV-D plan?

A Tribe or Tribal organization must include in its Tribal IV-D plan a description of the population subject to the jurisdiction of the Tribal court or administrative agency for child support enforcement purposes and certify that there are at least 100 children under the age of majority in the population subject to the jurisdiction of the Tribe in accordance with § 309.10 of this part and subject to § 309.10(c).
Document

Exhibit 10.6

ADDENDUM TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Ross Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) and ________ (the “Executive”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby enter into this Addendum to the Executive Employment Agreement entered into by the Parties effective ________ and any subsequent renewal of such agreement (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), and agree for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, as follows:


1. This Addendum is effective as of April 16, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).  
2. Notwithstanding Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement to the contrary, for the period beginning on the Effective Date and continuing until the date on which the Company determines, in its sole discretion, that at least fifty percent (50%) of the Company’s stores closed as of the Effective Date due to the COVID-19 health pandemic have fully reopened, Executive’s current gross salary shall be decreased by _____ percent (___%).  
3. This Addendum may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement.  A signed copy of this Addendum delivered by facsimile, e-mail, electronic signature, or other means of electronic transmission (including scan or .PDF) shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Addendum.
4. Except as otherwise amended by this Addendum, all provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  The Employment Agreement, as modified by this Addendum, represents the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements or understandings between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Addendum shall form a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have knowingly and voluntarily executed this Addendum as of the dates set forth below:






															
	ROSS STORES, INC.			EXECUTIVE	
					
					
					
	Name			Name	
					
	Dated:			Dated:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Howard Putnam, Appellant, *v.*Harold L. Palmer, as Superintendent of the Utica State Hospital, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Putnam*v. *Palmer,*123 App. Div. 133, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 30, 1909;

decided December 17, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 15, 1907, reversing that portion of an order of Special Term which awarded costs against the defendant personally in a habeas corpus proceeding.

*George H. Bunce*for appellant.

*H. J. Cookingham,*Jr., and *F. H. Cookingham*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 05, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 05, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0232. PATRICK ATWATER, JR. v. KELLY H. TUCKER.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV016
###### Editorial Note on Part 304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 304.22 Federal financial participation in purchased support enforcement services.

Federal financial participation is available at the applicable matching rate for the purchase of support enforcement services as provided for in the State plan to the extent that payment for such purchased services is in accordance with rates of payment established by the State which do not exceed the amounts reasonable and necessary to assure quality of such service and in the case of such services purchased from other public agencies, the cost reasonably assignable to such services. The determination that the amounts are reasonable and necessary and that the costs are reasonably assignable must be fully documented in the IV-D agency records. Support enforcement services which may be purchased with Federal financial participation are those for which Federal financial participation is otherwise available under § 304.20 and which are included under the approved State plan.

[40 FR 27166, June 26, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 57282, Dec. 23, 1982; 50 FR 19656, May 9, 1985]
#### § 1636.5 Recipient policies, procedures and recordkeeping.

Each recipient shall adopt written policies and procedures to guide its staff in complying with this part and shall maintain records sufficient to document the recipient's compliance with this part.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Jean
Jin, Chief Financial Officer of Gold Rock Resources, Inc., certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended April 30, 2008 (the
"Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrock
Resources, Inc.







Gold
      Rock Resources, Inc.Date: July 28,
      2008
            By:
            /s/ Jean
      JinJean
      JinChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Goldrock Resources, Inc. and will be
retained Goldrock Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 708.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations in this part provide the procedure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5514 and 5 CFR 550.1101 through 550.1110 for the collection by administrative offset of a Federal employee's salary without his or her consent to satisfy certain debts owed to the Federal government. This procedure applies to all Federal employees who owe debts to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission). This provision does not apply when the employee consents to recovery from his or her current pay account.
( b ) This procedure does not apply to debts or claims arising under: ( 1 ) The Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*);
( 2 ) The Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*);
( 3 ) The tariff laws of the United States; or
( 4 ) To any case where collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute (*e.g.,* travel advances in 5 U.S.C. 5705 and employee training expenses in 5 U.S.C. 4108).
( c ) The Commission shall except from salary offset provisions any adjustments to pay arising out of an employee's election of coverage or a change in coverage under a Federal benefits programs requiring periodic payroll deductions from pay, if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four pay periods or less.
( d ) These procedures do not preclude an employee or former employee from requesting a waiver of a salary overpayment under 5 U.S.C. 5584 or 10 U.S.C. 2774 or in any way questioning the amount or validity of the debt by submitting a subsequent claim to the General Accounting Office (GAO) in accordance with procedures prescribed by the GAO. In addition, this procedure does not preclude an employee from requesting a waiver pursuant to other statutory provisions applicable to the particular debt being collected.
Exhibit 32

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Integrated
 Performance Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended August 31,
 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the "Report"), I, D. Ronald Allen, Chief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 S1350, as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
 to the best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
 the Company.


 October 20, 2004

                               /s/  D. RONALD ALLEN
                               ------------------------------------
                                    D. Ronald Allen
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer