alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE
  OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the
  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
  Report"), I, Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer and I, Terry Mereniuk, Chief
  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: November 24, 2004 | /s/ Douglas Biles  
|------------------------ | -------------------
|                         | Douglas Biles, CEO 
|                         |                    
|                         |                    
|                         | /s/ Terry Mereniuk 
|                         | Terry Mereniuk, CFO

---
# CE2010009EN.01006901.xml

| 15.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 9/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 9/69

---

Thursday 9 October 2008Protocol to the EC-Switzerland Agreement on the free movement of persons (participation of Bulgaria and Romania) ***

P6_TA(2008)0464

European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 October 2008 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation, as contracting parties, of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to their accession to the European Union (9116/2008 — C6-0209/2008 — 2008/0080(AVC))

2010/C 9 E/13

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the draft Council decision (9116/2008),

having regard to the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons regarding the participation, as Contracting Parties, of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to their accession to the European Union (8689/2008),

having regard to the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons regarding the participation, as contracting parties, of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic pursuant to their accession to the European Union (1),

1

having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member states, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons (2),

2

having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence and Article 310 of the EC Treaty (C6-0209/2008),

having regard to Article 6(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession,

having regard to Rules 75 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0343/2008),

| 1. | Gives its assent to the conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its assent to the conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Swiss Confederation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Swiss Confederation.

---

(1)  OJ L 89, 28.3.2006, p. 30.

1

(2)  OJ L 114, 30.4.2002, p. 6.

2

---
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-2 |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------|

I, Dennis J. Mickey, Chief Operating Officer – Treasury of HSBC Finance Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 4.10(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I, as Depositor, HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-2, as Trust, the Company, as Servicer, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from August 10, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 5th  day of March 2007.                   

 

HSBC Finance Corporation

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ Dennis J. Mickey |
|--------|-----|----------------------|

|   | Name: | Dennis J. Mickey |
|--------|-------|------------------|

|   | Title: | Chief Operating Officer – Treasury |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Delemarre, Appellant.

*People*v. *Delemarre,*123 App. Div. 924, affirmed.

(Argued December 11, 1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Fehru*523ary *8,*1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover penalties under section 39 of the Forest, Fish and Game Law.

*George Malraison*for appellant.

*Robert C.*Beatty, *Frederic A. Burlingame*and *Selah B. Strong*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
§ 672.1 Hearing procedures—Scope of these rules. ( a ) These hearing rules govern all adjudicatory proceedings for the assessment of civil penalties or imposition of other sanctions pursuant to the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. 2407; 2404(f); 2401-2412; and
( b ) Other adjudicatory proceedings that the Foundation, in its discretion, determines are appropriate for handling under these rules, including proceedings governed by the Administrative Procedure Act requirements for “hearings on the record.” 5 U.S.C. 554 (1982).
( c ) Questions arising at any stage of the proceeding which are not addressed in these rules shall be resolved at the discretion of the Director or Presiding Officer.
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION IX PUBLIC RECORDS

4/20/05 Rule 902 1 RULE 902. DISTRICT'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (Adopted 3-8-84 ; and Proposed for Repeal April 20, 2005 )
1. When requesting information for determining the amount of air contaminants from a non-vehicular source pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 41511, et seq., or Regulation II of the District's Rules and Regulations, the District shall give notice to the source in writing that the information provided may be released: 1.1. to the public upon request, except for trade secrets which do not constitute emissions data; 1.2. to the California Air Resources Board; and, 1.3. to the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, which protects trade secrets as provided in the Clean Air Act, Section 114(c), as amended in 1970 in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Part 2.
2. Any person or source from whom the District obtains any records may label as "trade secret" any part of those records which is entitled to confidentiality pursuant to Government Code Section 6254.7 and Rule 901 hereinabove. Written justification for the "trade secret" designation shall be furnished to the District together with the records so designated. The justification and the the designation shall be a public record. The justification shall be as detailed as possible without disclosing the trade secret. The person or source may submit additional information to support the justification, and such information, upon request, shall be kept confidential in the same manner as the record sought to be protected.
* * * * *
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

Convened January 5, 1993 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, July 14, 1993 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar I Treati 

No. . Doc No 

1 

TREATIES 

SubJect Reported 

B:i 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nommee, Office And Predecessor Reported 

* 

No No B\ 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

248 295 Damel K Tarullo. of Massachusetts, to be Jun 29, 93 Mr. Pell, 

an Assistant Secretar) of State, vice Commmee on Fore1gn 

Eugene J. McAllister. resigned Relations. w1thout prmted 

reoort 

*S1gn1f1es nominee'£ commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Audit Division Recommendation ) 

Memorandum on the Democratic Party of ) 

Orange County (A09-12) ) 

CERTIFICATIQN 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on September 01,2011, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Democratic Party of Orange County, as recommended in 

the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division Memorandum dated 

August 18,2011. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

(f Date Snawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk ofthe Cbmmission
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Enabling Bioanalytical and Biophysical Technologies Study Section, January 31, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to February 1, 2007, 5 p.m., Courtyard Marriott, 299 Second Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 5, 2006, 71 FR 70522-70523.                

The meetings will be held February 1, 2007, to February 2, 2007. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 8, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-103 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Discussion

– 12/22/10

Participants

– Bill Neuffer; US EPA/OQPS/RTP, NC

– 919

- 541

- 5435; neuffer.bill@epa.gov Jeremy Richard; PCS Geismar, LA

– 225

– 621

- 1801; Jeremy.richard@pcsnitrogen .com
I called Jeremy to obtain information of the performance of the SCR installed at Unit 3 at PCS Geismar. Submitted emission test results for this unit showed NOx at 1.8 lb/T of 100 % acid. Je re my said Unit 3 was modified 3 years ago to produce a 65 % acid . Previously Unit 3 produced a 55% acid. This S CR is located after the gas expander and is thus an atmospheric SCR. Jeremy felt the gas/ammonia mixing was not as good due to this location. Unit 3 typically achieves 0.6

– 1.0 lb/T. Without too much tro uble, the SCR could be at 0.6 lb/T on a consistent basis. Below 0.6 would be very difficult to achieve on a consistent basis.
§ 605.10 Effect of state or local law or other requirements and effect of employment opportunities. ( a ) The obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any state or local law or other requirement that, on the basis of handicap, imposes prohibitions or limits upon the eligibility of qualified handicapped persons to receive services or to practice any occupation or profession.
( b ) The obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated because employment opportunities in any occupation or profession are or may be more limited for handicapped persons than for nonhandicapped persons.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00036-CR

BYRON O'KEITH BARRETT, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24865

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O RDER

Court reporter Terry Spangler recorded the trial court proceedings in our cause number 

06-13-00036-CR, styled Byron O’Keith Barrett v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 

24865 in the 6th Judicial District Court of Lamar County, Texas. The reporter’s record was due 

in this case April 29, 2013. After Spangler failed to respond to the efforts of our clerk’s office to 

obtain a status report on the missing record, we entered an order on May 16 requiring Spangler to 

file the record on or before May 31. Rather than file the record, as ordered, Spangler filed a 

motion for extension of time, which we granted, giving Spangler until June 7 to file the record. 

We have received nothing from Spangler, and our patience has been exhausted.

We hereby order Spangler to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-13-00036-CR, 

Byron O’Keith Barrett v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 24865, to be received by 

this Court no later than Wednesday, July 24, 2013. No further extensions of time will be 

granted.

If the record is not received by July 24, we advise Spangler that we will begin contempt 

proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Court 

for failing to obey its order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 17, 2013
November 17, 2015

 Exemption No. 12568A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−2407

Mr. Brandon Horgeshimer

Pneumatic Drone Cinema, Inc.

4327 South Highway 27

Clermont, FL 34711

Dear Mr. Horgeshimer:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated July 29, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Pneumatic Drone Cinema, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment 

to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. You requested an 

amendment to add conduct closed-set motion picture and television filming to 

your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. The 

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed 

and operating capabilities to those in this petition.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12568 

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 
2

granted an amendment to add closed-set motion picture and television filming to its UAS 

operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12568 remain in effect except 

as follows. Condition No. 2 has been updated to permit closed-set motion picture and 

television filming. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming 

are permitted. 

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
#### § 201.4 Administrative review of certain administrative decisions.

Pursuant to section 1116 of the Act, any State dissatisfied with a determination of the Administrator pursuant to § 201.3 (e) or (f) with respect to any plan or amendment may, within 60 days after the date of receipt of notification of such determination, file a petition with the Regional Administrator, asking the Administrator for reconsideration of the issue of whether such plan or amendment conforms to the requirements for approval under the Act and pertinent Federal requirements. Within 30 days after receipt of such a petition, the Administrator shall notify the State of the time and place at which the hearing for the purpose of reconsidering such issue will be held. Such hearing shall be held not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days after the date notice of such hearing is furnished to the State, unless the Administrator and the State agree in writing on another time. For hearing procedures, see part 213 of this chapter. A determination affirming, modifying, or reversing the Administrator's original decision will be made within 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing. Action pursuant to an initial determination by the Administrator described in such § 201.3 (e) or (f) that a plan or amendment is not approvable shall not be stayed pending the reconsideration, but in the event that the Administrator subsequently determines that his original decision was incorrect he shall certify restitution forthwith in a lump sum of any funds incorrectly withheld or otherwise denied.

[35 FR 12180, July 29, 1970, as amended at 42 FR 43977, Sept. 1, 1977; 53 FR 36579, Sept. 21, 1988]
# CE2009286EN.01008101.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 286/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 286/81

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008Revision of the framework directive on waste ***II

P6_TA(2008)0282

European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 June 2008 on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and repealing certain Directives (11406/4/2007 — C6-0056/2008 — 2005/0281(COD))

2009/C 286 E/34

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Council common position (11406/4/2007 — C6-0056/2008),

having regard to its position at first reading (1) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0667),

1

having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0162/2008),

| 1. | Approves the common position as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the common position as amended;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p. 135.

1

---

Tuesday 17 June 2008P6_TC2-COD(2005)0281

Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 17 June 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and repealing certain Directives

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2008/98/EC.)

---
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Proposed Final Addendum Audit R^ort 

of the Commission on die Committee on 

Arrangements for the 2012 Republican 

National Convention 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election Commission, 

do hereby certify that on November 07,2014, the Commission decided by a 

vote of 6-0 to approve the repayment of $694,328, as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and die Audit Division dated 

November 4,2014. 

Coimnissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date $helley E. Gar^ 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission