T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B AL WI ND E R S I NG H S AN GH E R A; H A RJ EET K A U R, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 07- 74413 08- 70697 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 574- 816

A 095- 574- 817 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w , B a l w i nde rS i ngh S anghe r aa nd H a r j e e tK aur , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of I ndi aa nd pe rm ane ntr e s i de nt s of the P hi l i pp i nes, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) orders denyi ng thei r m ot i on s t o reopen and re consi der. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 

# FI LED JU L 16 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74413 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to re op en or re consi der, Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d 78 5, 79 1 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) , a n dwe d e n yi n p arta n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n s f o rr e v i e w. T h e B IA co rrect l y co n stru edp et i t i o n ers’ N o v em b er 1 4 , 2 0 0 7 , m o t i o n as a m o tio n to r e o p e n an dr e c o n s id e r . See M oh am m ed , 4 0 0 F .3 da t 7 9 2 - 9 3 ( B I A s h o u ld c o n s tru e th e m o tio n b a s e do n its u n d e r ly in g p u rp o s e s ) . T he B I A a c t e d w i thi n i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the N ove m be r14, 2007, m ot i on t o rec on si der because the m ot i on fa i l ed t o i dent i fyany e rr or of fa ctor l aw in th e B I A ’s p r io rd e c is io n d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ f ir s t m o tio n to r e o p e n . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; So c o p - G o n z a lezv . I

NS , 27 2 F . 3d 11 76 , 11 80 n. 2 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 1 ) ( e n b an c ) . T he B I A a l s o a c t e d w i thi n i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng pe t i t i one r s ’ June 5, 2007, and N ov em ber 14, 20 07 , m ot i on s t o reopen b ec ause i n b oth i nst ance s the B IA c o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e th e ys ub m itte da n da c te dw ith in its b r o a dd is c r e tio n in de t e rm i ni ng tha tthe e vi de nc e w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o t ol l the de a dl i ne ort o w arr ant r e o p e n in g . Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 295 F . 3d 1037, 1039 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( B I A ’ s de ni a l of am o tio n to r e o p e n s h a ll b e r e v e r s e dif it is “a rb itr ary , irr a tio n a l, o rc o n tr aryto l aw ”) .07- 74413 3 W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew pet i t i on er s’ cont ent i on thatpri or coun se l pr ovi de d i ne f

f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e be c aus e the yf a i l e d t o r a i s e tha ti s s ue be f or e the B I A an dth e r e b yf

a ile dto e x h au s t th e ira d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s . See O n t i vero sLo p ezv . I NS , 2 1 3 F .3 d1 1 2 1 , 1 1 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( c o u rt la c k s ju r is d ic tio n to re vi ew i neff

ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se l cl ai m no tra i se d b ef ore the agency) . P E T IT IO N S F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.