alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009175EN.01012201.xml

| 28.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/122

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive .../.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of [...] on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 48 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent’

COM(2008) 544 final — 2008/0173 (COD)

(2009/C 175/23)

On 8 October 2008, the Council of the European Union decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 44 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Directive .../.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of [...] on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 48 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent

Proposal for a Directive .../.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of [...] on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 48 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent

COM(2008) 544 final — 2008/0173 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 449th plenary session of 3 and 4 December 2008 (meeting of 3 December 2008), by 169 votes to two and four abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 3 December 2008.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

The Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee

Martin WESTLAKE

---
#### § 108.147 Certain paints prohibited.

No nitrocellulose or other highly flammable or noxious fume-producing paint or lacquer may be used on a unit.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Uri Nissani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Uri Nissani


Uri Nissani


Chief Executive Officer





May 16, 2011




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference
#### § 96.49 Due date for receipt of all information required for completion of tribal applications for the low-income home energy assistance block grants.

Effective beginning in FY 2001, for the low-income home energy assistance program, Indian tribes and tribal organizations that make requests for direct funding from the Department must insure that all information necessary to complete their application is received by December 15 of the fiscal year for which funds are requested, unless the State(s) in which the tribe is located agrees to a later date. After December 15, funds will revert to the State(s) in which the tribe is located, unless the State(s) agrees to a later date. If funds revert to a State, the State is responsible for providing low-income home energy assistance program services to the service population of the tribe.

[64 FR 55857, Oct. 15, 1999]
§ 154.210 Review of rate increases subject to review by CMS or by a State. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, CMS will review a rate increase subject to review to determine whether it is unreasonable, as required by this part.
( b ) CMS will adopt a State's determination of whether a rate increase is an unreasonable rate increase, if the State: ( 1 ) Has an Effective Rate Review Program as described in § 154.301; and
( 2 ) The State provides to CMS, on a form and in a manner prescribed by the Secretary, its final determination of whether a rate increase is unreasonable, which must include a brief explanation of how its analysis of the relevant factors set forth in § 154.301(a)(3) caused it to arrive at that determination, within five business days following the State's final determination.
( c ) CMS will post and maintain on its Web site a list of the States with market segments that meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
# CE2009068EN.01003601.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 68/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 68/36

---

European Parliament decision of 31 January 2008 on interpretation of Rule 19 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure on the duties of the President

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the letter of 24 January 2008 from the chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 24 January 2008 from the chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 201 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 201 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Adopts the following interpretation of Rule 19:‘Rule 19(1) can be interpreted as meaning that the powers conferred by that Rule include the power to call an end to the excessive use of motions such as points of order, procedural motions, explanations of vote and requests for separate, split or roll-call votes where the President is convinced that these are manifestly intended to cause and will result in a prolonged and serious obstruction of the procedures of the House or the rights of other Members;’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts the following interpretation of Rule 19:‘Rule 19(1) can be interpreted as meaning that the powers conferred by that Rule include the power to call an end to the excessive use of motions such as points of order, procedural motions, explanations of vote and requests for separate, split or roll-call votes where the President is convinced that these are manifestly intended to cause and will result in a prolonged and serious obstruction of the procedures of the House or the rights of other Members;’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 ) 

PURSUING AMERICA’S GREATNESS, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 15-cv-1217 (TSC) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

Defendant. ) 

 ) 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 2), it is 

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. 

Date: September 24, 2015 

Tanya S. Chutkan 

TANYA S. CHUTKAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:15-cv-01217-TSC Document 22 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 1
Merrimack,

No. 5382.

#### State *v.*Arthur J. Harvey.

Argued September 9, 1965.

Decided October 5, 1965.

*447
      *William J.*O'Neil, Assistant Attorney General (by brief and orally), for the State.

*Arthur J. Harvey*(by brief and orally), pro se.

Duncan, J.

The ordinance which gives rise to these proceedings prohibits distribution in any public place of “any handbills, cards, papers or advertising matter of any kind or description.” It provides further that the ordinance shall not be construed to prohibit the sale of newspapers and periodicals.

The offense charged against the defendant consisted of his distribution at the entrance of the high school of a pamphlet published by him under the name of “The Greenleaf” which is said to have contained arguments in favor of world peace and against war.

In entering the nol pros the county attorney filed a “memorandum of law” expressing the opinion that application of the ordinance to the defendant’s actions would be unconstitutional under decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. The memorandum expressed the further opinion that the ordinance might constitutionally be applied to prohibit the distribution of matter of a commercial nature and that the defendant’s pamphlet was not of such a nature.

*448By his brief filed in this court, the defendant has withdrawn his objection to the nol pros “since a judicial review is taking place anyway.” The substance of his position is contained in the following statement of his brief: “It is my belief that a fundamental right of any person subject to a law, is to know the law’s meaning, and to have any doubts or questions about the law’s constitutionality settled. The County Attorney’s Memorandum of Law presumably rules out further arrests by the police at this time, but it is no assurance that the ordinance will not be applied under future County Attorneys, or that Complaints will not be filed by private citizens leading to further convictions.”

In effect the defendant seeks a declaratory judgment or advisory opinion establishing that the ordinance is invalid as applied to his conduct, although the State no longer claims the conduct to have been a violation. The law is plain that the relief which the defendant seeks will not lie in the circumstances disclosed. The State now makes no claim of any rights adverse to those asserted by the defendant. “There is no right to an adjudication of matters not in contention.” *Conway*v. *Water Resources Board,*89 N. H. 346, 349. *Cf. Faulkner*v. *Keene,*85 N. H. 147. In this situation a petition for declaratory judgment will not lie. The law is also plain that advisory opinions cannot be given by this court on the petition of private individuals. Const., Pt. II, *Art.*74. See *Petition of Turner,*97 N. H. 449.

*Petition dismissed.*

All concurred.
# CE2010015EN.01009501.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 15/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 15/95

---

Tuesday 21 October 2008Simple pressure vessels (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0481

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to simple pressure vessels (codified version) (COM(2008)0202 — C6-0172/2008 — 2008/0076(COD))

2010/C 15 E/24

(Codecision procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0202),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0172/2008),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0381/2008),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1809 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1809

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the geographical 
       coverage of TRICARE Prime to include Puerto Rico and Guam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2009

 Mr. Pierluisi (for himself and Ms. Bordallo) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the geographical 
       coverage of TRICARE Prime to include Puerto Rico and Guam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF TRICARE PRIME GEOGRAPHICAL COVERAGE.

    Section 1097(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(3) total health care services, including the managed 
        care option of the TRICARE program, for all covered 
        beneficiaries who reside in geographical areas designated by 
        the Secretary within the several States, the District of 
        Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 92.211 Nondiscrimination in the delivery of health programs and activities through telehealth services.

A covered entity must not, in delivery of its health programs and activities through telehealth services, discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
#### Charles A. Satterly, Appellant, *v.*Edward E. Dewick, Individually and as Executor of Sarah A. Satterly, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Satterly*v. *Lewick,*129 App. Div. 701, affirmed.

(Submitted January 12, 1910;

decided January 28, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 11, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to set aside a devise contained in the will of Sarah A. Satterly, deceased.

*Thomas J. Ritch, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Rowland Miles*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed,with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, IIaight, Yann, Werner and Hiscook, JJ.
#### § 506.16 Failure to meet the conditions and requirements prescribed under the Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949.

For the purpose of this part, obligations under the Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949, consist of the responsibility assumed by the contracting parties thereto with respect to prisoners of war within the meaning of the Convention, to comply with and to fully observe the provisions of the Convention, and particularly those articles relating to food rations of prisoners of war, humane treatment, protection, and labor of prisoners of war, and the failure to abide by the conditions and requirements established in such Convention by any hostile force with which the Armed Forces of the United States were engaged in armed conflict.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

)

VIRGINIA JAMES, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 12-1451 (JRB, RLW, JEB)

)

v. )

) Joint Status Report and Stipulation

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

)

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Virginia James instituted this action against defendant Federal Election 

Commission challenging the Federal Election Campaign Act’s biennial limit on an individual’s 

total contributions to candidates and the authorized committees of candidates at 2 U.S.C. 

§ 441a(a)(3)(A). In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, __U.S. __, 

134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014), which disposed of the issues herein, and of the Supreme Court’s vacatur

of this Court’s earlier judgment in this case, no live controversy remains and the parties now 

agree to entry of the attached proposed order and judgment.

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Allen Dickerson Lisa Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628)

Allen Dickerson (D.C. Bar No. 1003781) Deputy General Counsel — Law

Center for Competitive Politics lstevenson@fec.gov

124 S. West Street

Suite 201 Kevin Deeley

Alexandria, VA 22314 Acting Associate General Counsel

Phone: (703) 894-6800 kdeeley@fec.gov

adickerson@campaignfreedom.org

Case 1:12-cv-01451-JEB-JRB-RLW Document 26 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 2
2

Erin Chlopak (D.C. Bar No. 496370)

Acting Assistant General Counsel

echlopak@fec.gov

s/ Steve N. Hajjar

Steve N. Hajjar

Attorney

shajjar@fec.gov

 DEFENDANT

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20463

(202) 694-1650

May 2, 2014 (202) 219-0260 (fax)

Case 1:12-cv-01451-JEB-JRB-RLW Document 26 Filed 05/02/14 Page 2 of 2
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-05 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Ted ) 

Cruz for Senate ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on June 02, 2017, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 5-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Ted Cruz for 

Senate, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance 

Officer and the Audit Division dated May 30,2017. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision 

Attest: 

Date Dayna C. Brown 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
# CE2010045EN.01010501.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/105 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/105

---

Expenditure in the veterinary field (codified version) *

P6_TA(2008)0592

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2008 on the proposal for a Council decision on expenditure in the veterinary field (codified version) (COM(2008)0358 — C6-0271/2008 — 2008/0116(CNS))

(2010/C 45 E/28)

(Consultation procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2008)0358), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2008)0358),

| — | having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0271/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0271/2008),

| — | having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

| — | having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0464/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0464/2008),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

2.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---