alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                3,319
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        57,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                            940
<INVENTORY>                                          57,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    132,535
<PP&E>                                              133,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                       63,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      235,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                57,650
<BONDS>                                             100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             521
<COMMON>                                                  2
<OTHER-SE>                                           19,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        235,148
<SALES>                                             148,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    148,546
<CGS>                                               104,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        39,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         54
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    6,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (4,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (1,988)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,731)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 233 ) IV-E-108 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/20082:42:59PM

Sheet 233 of 242P. 2 

# A-ffl-t t

v 4 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

# vss y JU L

## 2 8 199

3

MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Telephon e Conferenc e wit hRepresentative s o f

America nPetroleu mInstitut e (API ) FROM : Steve nSilverman , Attorne y^£$lS€s>0^k^iMA)mrCrl^/C^

Offic e o f Genera l Counse l TO : Onboar d Docke t ( A87-11 ) O nJul y15th , I ha d a telephon e conversatio nwit hAlic e Crow e an d Jef f Tras k o f AP I regardin g certai nissue s likel yt o b e raise d i nth e reopene d rulemakin g requirin g Onboar d Vapo r Recovery . The y ar e concerne d tha t promulgatin g a n Onboar d requiremen t fo r othe r tha nligh t dut yvehicle s (LDVs ) coul d dela yultimat e LD V promulgation . I sai d tha t I didn' t thin k thi s wa s th e case , particularl ygive nou r settlemen t agreement . The yals o wondere d i f LD V an d non-LD V

requirements , i f adopted , coul d b e include d i n separat e regulator yprovisions . I sai d thi s wa s simpl ya matte r o f tast e withou t substantiv e effect , an d tha t th e hypothetica l requirement s wer e easil yseverabl e i nanycase .
#### § 800.601 Reservation of authority.

OPM reserves the right to implement and supplement these regulations with written operational guidelines.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

          - 36 CFR Part 228 
          - RIN 0596-AC20 

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - 43 CFR Part 3160 
          - [W0-610-411H12-24 1A] 
          - RIN 1004-AD59 

# AGENCIES:

U.S. Forest Service, Agriculture; Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Joint final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

On March 7, 2007, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management jointly published a final rule (72 FR 10308). The dates heading on page 10308 incorrectly set out the effective date as April 6, 2007. The correct effective date of the final rule is May 7, 2007, consistent with the chart on page 10328. 

# DATES:

The effective date of the final rule published March 7, 2007 (72 FR 10308) is corrected to May 7, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelly Odom, Bureau of Land Management, at (202) 452-5028. 

Tony Ferguson, 

Assistant Director, Minerals and Geology Management, United States Forest Service. 

Ray Brady, 

Acting Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection, Bureau of Land Management. 

[FR Doc. 07-1150  Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-84-P
§ 63.7 Disposition of applications. ( a ) *Approval, disapproval, or deferral.* On the basis of the review of an application pursuant to § 63.6 the Assistant Secretary will either ( 1 ) approve the application in whole or in part, for such amount of funds and subject to such conditions as he/she deems necessary or desirable for the completion of the approved project,
( 2 ) disapprove the application, or
( 3 ) defer action on the application for such reasons as lack of funds or a need for further review.
( b ) *Notification of disposition.* The Assistant Secretary will notify the applicant in writing of the disposition of its application. A signed notification of grant award will be issued to notify the applicant of an approved project application.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) All-14 

Audit Division Reconunendation ) Agenda Document No. 14-3 

Memorandum on the Dallas County ) 

Republican Party (DCRP) ) 

CERTmCATION 

I, Shelley £. Garr, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting on 

Januaiy 30,2014 do hereby certify that fhe Commission took the following actions in the abovecaptioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to: 

Find that DCRP failed to keep monthly time logs for die $85,520 in payroll 

consisting of payments allocated between federal and non-federal funds and 

100% non-federal payments, subject to an amendment to include the $56,407 

paid to contract workers. 

Conmiissioners Ravel, Walther, and Wemtraub voted affinnatively for the motion. 

Commissionera Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen dissented. 

2. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

a. Find that DCRP misstated its financial activity for calendar year 2010. 

b. Find that DCRP fiiiled to maintain logs to document the time employees 

spent on federal election activity totaling $85,520. 

Conunissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

'Shelley E.G8 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
From: McKaughan, Colleen

To: stephenbetsitty@navajo-nsn.gov ; eugeniaquintana@navajo-nsn.gov
Cc: Rios, Gerardo ; Chew, Andrew Subject: McElmo Creek PSD Permit

Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:19:29 PM

Hi, Steve and Eugenia,

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consult with you about Region 9's plans to propose a PSD permitting action for the Main Flare at Resolute's McElmo Creek Unit. As we explained, this permitting action is not for any new project, but rather to incorporate EPA's 2005 Consent Decree requirements into the Facility’s existing PSD permit. As a result, these requirements would be made enforceable through the permit after the Consent Decree terminates. Secondly, this proposed action would update the outdated PSD permit to address equipment that has shut down and has been removed from the premises.

Because this proposed action is not significant or part of any new project, and based on the discussion we had with you on May 8, it is our understanding that ongoing communications and coordination between Navajo EPA and EPA Region 9 Air Division staff regarding this action should suffice as consultation between EPA and the Navajo government. During the public comment period, our Region will consider holding a public hearing if we determine that there is a significant amount of public interest. If you have any questions or comments, please call or e-mail me. I hope you both have a good holiday weekend.

Colleen McKaughan
EMILY’S LIST,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

 Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 05–49 (CKK)

ORDER

(July 12, 2007)

As the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin

Right to Life, 551 U.S. __, (2007) impacts a number of the arguments raised by the Parties in

their pending motions for summary judgment in this case, the Court shall require the Parties to

file updated motions for summary judgment that accurately reflect the present state of the law.

Accordingly, it is, this 12th day of July, 2007, hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s [20] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE; it is also

ORDERED that Defendant’s [23] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; it is also

ORDERED that the Parties shall file a joint status report by July 27, 2007, including a

proposed briefing schedule for the filing of updated motions for summary judgment.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00049-CKK Document 29 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of HighwaterEthanol, LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2008, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianKletscher, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian Kletscher                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian Kletscher, Principal Executive Officer |
|   | Dated: January 29, 2009                      |

 

----
§ 81.121 Posttermination proceedings. ( a ) An applicant or recipient adversely affected by the order terminating, discontinuing, or refusing Federal financial assistance in consequence of proceedings pursuant to this title may request the responsible Department official for an order authorizing payment, or permitting resumption, of Federal financial assistance. Such request shall be in writing and shall affirmatively show that since entry of the order, it has brought its program or activity into compliance with the requirements of the Act, and with the Regulation thereunder, and shall set forth specifically, and in detail, the steps which it has taken to achieve such compliance. If the responsible Department official denies such request the applicant or recipient shall be given an expeditious hearing if it so requests in writing and specifies why it believes the responsible Department official to have been in error. The request for such a hearing shall be addressed to the responsible Department official and shall be made within 30 days after the applicant or recipient is informed that the responsible Department official has refused to authorize payment or permit resumption of Federal financial assistance.
( b ) In the event that a hearing shall be requested pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the hearing procedures established by this part shall be applicable to the proceedings, except as otherwise provided in this section.
-78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/28

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
§ 73.735-301 Courtesy and consideration for others. ( a ) An employee's conduct on the job is, in all respects, of concern to the Federal government. Courtesy, consideration, and promptness in dealing with the public must be shown in carrying out official responsibilities, and actions which deny the dignity of individuals or conduct which is disrespectful to others must be avoided. Employees must recognize that inattention to matters of common courtesy can adversely affect the quality of service the Department is responsible for providing. Where appropriate, courtesy to the public should be included in the standards for employee performance.
( b ) Of equal importance is the requirement that courtesy be shown in day-by-day interaction with co-workers. Employees shall be polite to and considerate of other employees, and shall respect their needs and concerns in the work environment.
#### § 3.1 Definitions.

*Director* means the Director or Acting Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or other officer or employee of NIH to whom the authority involved has been delegated.

*Enclave* means, unless the context requires a different meaning, the area, containing about 318 acres, acquired by the United States in several parcels in the years 1935 through 1983, and any further future acquisitions, comprising the National Institutes of Health located in Montgomery County, Maryland, over which the United States acquired exclusive jurisdiction under the Act of March 31, 1953, Chapter 158 (1953 Maryland Laws 311).

*Police officer* means a uniformed or non-uniformed police officer appointed under a delegation of authority to the Director under Title U.S. Public Law 107-296, Homeland Security Act of 2002; any other Federal law enforcement officer; and any other person whose law enforcement services are secured by contract, or upon request or deputation from a State or local law enforcement agency.

[55 FR 2068, Jan. 22, 1990, as amended at 85 FR 72910, Nov. 16, 2020]
#### §§ 75.387-75.390 [Reserved]
#### § 605.51 Application of this subpart.

Subpart F applies to health, welfare, and other social service programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.

[47 FR 8573, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51381, Aug. 26, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR—5045-N-51] 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         December 22, 2006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (there telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: December 14, 2006.

Mark R. Johnston, 

Acting Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 06-9768 Filed 12-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Francis C. Murphy, Appellant, *v.*Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Murphy*v. *Bingham,*130 App. Div. 112, affirmed.

(Argued October *4,*1909;

decided October 19, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 15, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to recognize the relator as a telegraph operator with the rank and compensation of a lieutenant of police in the police department of the city of New York.

*William II. Good*and *J. Grattan MaoMahon*for appellant.

*Francis IL*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel {Terence Farley*, *Theodore Connoly*and *Thomas F. Noonan*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.§1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of EnteroMedics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark B. Knudson,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

March 29, 2010
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1738 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

city of Downey, California, regional wastewater treatment and reclamation facility projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD (for herself and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the city of Downey, California, regional wastewater treatment and reclamation 

facility projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Downey Regional 

5 Water Reclamation and Groundwater Augmentation 

6 Project of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1738 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 adding after the last section the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. CITY OF DOWNEY REGIONAL WATER REC7 LAMATION AND GROUNDWATER AUGMENTA8 TION PROJECT, CALIFORNIA. 

9 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera10 tion with the city of Downey, California, may participate 

11 in the design, planning, and construction of permanent fa12 cilities needed to establish recycled water distribution and 

13 wastewater treatment and reclamation facilities that will 

14 be used to treat wastewater and provide recycled water 

15 in the cities of Downey Cerritos, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, 

16 South Gate, and Lakewood, California. 

17 ‘‘(b) COST-SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

18 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

19 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

20 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

21 shall not be used for the operation and maintenance of 

22 the project described in subsection (a). 

23 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

24 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

25 $20,000,000. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1738 IH

1 ‘‘(e) SUNSET OF AUTHORITY.—This section shall 

2 have no effect after the date that is 10 years after the 

3 date of the enactment of this section.’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec5 tions in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by 

6 adding after the last item the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. City of Downey regional water reclamation and groundwater 

augmentation project, California.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS