alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 411.68 Post-allegation protection. ( a ) Care provider facilities must ensure that UC victims of sexual abuse and sexual harassment are assigned to a supportive environment that represents the least restrictive housing option possible to keep the UC safe and secure, subject to the requirements of § 411.42.
( b ) The care provider facility should employ multiple protection measures to ensure the safety and security of UC victims of sexual abuse and sexual harassment, including but not limited to: Housing changes or transfers for UC victims and/or abusers or harassers; removal of alleged UC abusers or harassers from contact with victims; and emotional support services for UCs or staff who fear retaliation for reporting sexual abuse or sexual harassment or cooperating with investigations.
( c ) A UC victim may be placed on one-on-one supervision in order to protect the UC in exigent circumstances. Before taking the UC off of one-on-one supervision, the care provider facility must complete a re-assessment taking into consideration any increased vulnerability of the UC as a result of the sexual abuse or sexual harassment. The re-assessment must be completed as soon as possible and without delay so that the UC is not on one-on-one supervision longer than is absolutely necessary for safety and security reasons.
# EUR-Lex - 52008AP0216 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52008AP0216

**Farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 May 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 (COM(2007)0245 — C6-0127/2007 — 2007/0084(COD)) - P6_TC1-COD(2007)0084 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 21 May 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No …/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 **

*
Official Journal C 279 E , 19/11/2009 P. 0168 - 0168 *

Farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods ***I

P6_TA(2008)0216

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 May 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 (COM(2007)0245 — C6-0127/2007 — 2007/0084(COD))

(2009/C 279 E/36)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0245),

- having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0127/2007),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0061/2008),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

--------------------------------------------------

P6_TC1-COD(2007)0084

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 21 May 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No .../2008.)

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 1901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-134]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 1901]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2007-9 of December 15, 
                2006

                
Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem 
                Embassy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 
                1995 (Public Law 104-45) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that it is necessary to protect the national 
                security interests of the United States to suspend for 
                a period of 6 months the limitations set forth in 
                section 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act. My Administration 
                remains committed to beginning the process of moving 
                our Embassy to Jerusalem.

                You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress, accompanied by a report 
                in accordance with section 7(a) of the Act, and to 
                publish the determination in the Federal Register.

                This suspension shall take effect after transmission of 
                this determination and report to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 15, 2006.

[FR Doc. 07-134
Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### § 81.115 Matters not prohibited.

A request for information which merely inquires about the status of a proceeding without discussing issues or expressing points of view is not deemed an ex parte communication. Such requests should be directed to the Civil Rights hearing clerk. Communications with respect to minor procedural matters or inquiries or emergency requests for extensions of time are not deemed ex parte communications prohibited by § 81.113. Where feasible, however, such communications should be by letter with copies to all parties. Ex parte communications between a respondent and the responsible Department official or the Secretary with respect to securing such respondent's voluntary compliance with any requirement of part 80 of this title are not prohibited.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1003]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 15 March 2007, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the 
appearance of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and 
memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign 
language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the 
Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting.

    Dated in Washington, DC, February 28, 2007.
Thomas Luebke,
AIA, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-1003 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
**Exhibit 10.20**

**Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation**

Directors who are also PAETEC officers oremployees do not receive any additional compensation for serving on PAETEC’s board of directors or any of its committees. Prior to October 2007, each non-employee director was entitled to annual fees of $50,000, payable in cash in four equalquarterly installments in arrears. 

In October 2007, the compensation committee of the board of directors recommended, and the board ofdirectors approved, the following revised policies relating to the compensation of directors for their service on the board of directors and its committees. Under the new policies, the audit committee chairman is entitled to annual cash fees of$80,000 and an annual grant of stock options for 10,000 shares of common stock and restricted stock units for 10,000 shares of common stock. The other audit committee members are entitled to annual cash fees of $60,000 and an annual grant of stockoptions for 7,000 shares of common stock and restricted stock units for 7,000 shares of common stock. The compensation committee chairman is entitled to annual cash fees of $70,000 and an annual grant of stock options for 8,000 shares of commonstock and restricted stock units for 8,000 shares of common stock. The other compensation committee members as well as directors that do not serve on any board committee are entitled to annual cash fees of $50,000 and an annual grant of stockoptions for 5,000 shares of common stock and restricted stock units for 5,000 shares of common stock. The Vice Chairman is entitled for his board service to annual cash fees of $70,000 and an annual grant of stock options for 8,000 shares of commonstock and restricted stock units for 8,000 shares of common stock. All cash fees are payable in four equal quarterly installments in arrears. All equity grants vest with respect to one-third of the underlying shares of common stock on each of thefirst, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. 

All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurredin connection with their board service. In addition, Mr. Tansukh Ganatra is entitled to participate in the company’s health insurance plan in which the company covers a portion of the expenses.
---

---

# Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.,
a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel (the Company),
for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge, that:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
               of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                  |                                 
|--------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|By: /s/ Yuval Viner | By: /s/ Eyal Cohen
|Yuval Viner                       | Eyal Cohen                      
|Chief Executive Officer           | Chief Financial Officer         

Date: October 22, 2009



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          19,050
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          20,358
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    147,922
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,703
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            43,636
<LOANS>                                        599,304
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,665
<DEPOSITS>                                     583,200
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,607
<LONG-TERM>                                    130,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,571
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 867,665
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 32,858
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,148
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,222
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                43,228
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,323
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,553
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,675
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      710
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,753
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,788
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,788
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.59
<LOANS-NON>                                        524
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    860
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,160
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (120)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,750
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 304.23 Expenditures for which Federal financial participation is not available. Federal financial participation at the applicable matching rate is not available for: ( a ) Activities related to administering titles I, IV-A, IV-B, IV-E, X, XIV, XVI, XIX, XX, or XXI of the Act or 7 U.S.C. Chapter 51.
( b ) Purchased support enforcement services which are not secured in accordance with § 304.22.
( c ) Construction and major renovations.
( d ) Education and training programs and educational services for State and county employees and court personnel except direct cost of short-term training provided to IV-D agency staff in accordance with §§ 304.20(b)(2)(viii) and 304.21.
( e ) Any expenditures which have been reimbursed by fees collected as required by this chapter.
( f ) Any costs of those caseworkers described in § 303.20(e) of this chapter.
( g ) Any expenditures made to carry out an agreement under § 303.15 of this chapter.
( h ) The costs of counsel for indigent defendants in IV-D actions.
( i ) Any expenditures for jailing of parents in child support enforcement cases.
( j ) The costs of *guardians ad litem* in IV-D actions.
[81 FR 93567, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### Petition of Burke.

*Assessment—proceedings to vacate*— *evidence of ownership.*

The affidavit in hehalf of B., who petitioned to vacate an assessment on certain lots allegedito be void, stated “ that at the time of the confirmation of the assessment the petitioner was the lessee of and as such liable for the pay. ment of the assessment imposed on the lots mentioned,” etc. *Held,*not to show interest in the petitioner in the lands affected by the assessment such as entitled him to institute proceedings to vacate the same.

Appeal by the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York frgpi an order at special term vacating an assessment on the property of the petitioner Edward Burke for a cross-walk across West street in said city.

*E. Delafield Smith,*for appellants.

*Neville & Andrews,*for respondent.

Davis, P. J.

The facts in this case, are similar to those in *Petition of Phillips, ante,*p. 484, and the decision and findings the same.

*Order reversed.*
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[TEXT]
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
Financial Data Schedule
 "This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from December 31, 1998 10KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                             28,726
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      178,382
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        10,358,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             49,937
<DEPRECIATION>                     (1,213,789)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     9,840,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0
<BONDS>                            16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        1,212
<COMMON>                           47,629
<OTHER-SE>                         9,621,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       9,840,060
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   28,772
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      256,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (228,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (228,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (228,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0


</TABLE>
#### Disbrow v. Mills, appellant.

Deposits— *special funds in hands of surrogate—intermingling special deposits.*

A surrogate received from Ms predecessors $7,267.89 as balance of funds in such predecessor’s hands as surrogate. Included in this fund as a part thereof,' was $2,653.19 belonging to plaintiff. The surrogate made no inquiry or attempt to ascertain to whom the several sums comprised in the $7,267.-89 belonged, but paid therefrom various claims other than plaintiff presented, until the sum in his hands was reduced to $1,400. *Meld,*that such surrogate was liable to plaintiff for the whole of the $2,653.19. The deposit by the surrogate’s predecessor of the funds belonging to plaintiff indiscriminately with other funds, did not impair the title of the plaintiff to such fund. *Van Alen*v. *Am. Nat. Bank,*52 N. Y. 1; Hilt, on Trustees, 164.

_ ' Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon-the report of a referee. The action was brought in Westchester county by Bethia E. Disbrow against John W. Mills, surrogate of said county, to recover moneys deposited in his hands and belonging to plaintiff.

*Marshall & Ver planch*and *Robert Cochran,*for appellant.

*Stanley & Brown,*for respondent.

Talcott, J.

The head-note states the only material point in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ROBINSON COMMITTEE, LLC and JACK E. ROBINSON 

Petitioners

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-11335-GAO

 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

Respondent

 ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 O’Toole D.J. 

In accordance with the Court’s Opinion and Order Granting the 

Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (docket number 11) dated February 21, 2012, it 

is hereby ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed.

 2/21/2012 By the Court,

Date

 /s/Christophe Danieli 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:10-cv-11335-GAO Document 15 Filed 02/21/12 Page 1 of 1
Executive Order 13427

# Extending Privileges and Immunities to the Permanent 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7(b) of the Department of State Authorities Act of 2006 (22 U.S.C. 288l), I hereby extend to the Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See to the United Nations in New York, and to its members, the privileges and immunities enjoyed by the diplomatic missions of member states to the United Nations, and members of such missions, subject to corresponding conditions and obligations. 

This extension of privileges and immunities is not intended to abridge in any respect privileges or immunities that the Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See to the United Nations in New York and its members otherwise may have acquired or may acquire by law.

[FR Doc. 07-1152

Billing code 3195-01-P
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Jason
Walsh, state and attest that:




(1) I am
the Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of Scout Exploration, Inc. (the
“Company”).




(2)
Accompanying this certification is the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, (the “Report”) as filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
which contains financial statements.




(3) I
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that




▪
            the
      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
      and




▪
            the
      information specified in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the period presented.




/s/
Jason
Walsh


Jason
Walsh


Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer


January
28, 2009






A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scout Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Scout Exploration,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.