alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2009184EN.01012303.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/123 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/123

---

Thursday 21 February 2008Common framework for the marketing of products ***I

P6_TA(2008)0062

P6_TA(2008)0062

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 February 2008 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common framework for the marketing of products (COM(2007)0053 — C6-0067/2007 — 2007/0030(COD))

2009/C 184 E/36

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0053),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0067/2007),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0490/2007),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

Thursday 21 February 2008P6_TC1-COD(2007)0030

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 21 February 2008 with a view to the adoption of Decision No .../2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common framework for the marketing of products, and repealing Decision 93/465/EEC

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Decision No .../2008/EC.)

---
§ 400.23 Hearings. ( a ) A State must provide applicants for, and recipients of, assistance and services under the Act with an opportunity for a hearing to contest adverse determinations using hearing procedures set forth in § 205.10(a) of this title for public assistance programs unless otherwise specified in this part.
( b ) If the issue is the date of entry into the United States of an applicant for or recipient of assistance or services, the State or its designee must provide for prompt resolution of the issue by inspection of the individual's documentation issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) or by information obtained from INS, rather than by hearing.
[51 FR 3914, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 65 FR 15443, Mar. 22, 2000]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2014

No. 04-13-00441-CV

RIO GRANDE H2O GUARDIAN and Albert Furney Muller, Jr.,

Appellants

v.

ROBERT MULLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD, DBA Robert Muller LTD and Rosetta 

Stone, LLC,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CVQ001860D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Senate Floor Activity - Friday, March 8, 2024

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Friday, March  8)

 H.R. 4366

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

 S.Amdt. 1618

 S.Amdt. 1619

 S.Amdt. 1620

 S.Amdt. 1621

 S.Amdt. 1622

 S.Amdt. 1623

 S.Amdt. 1626

 S.Amdt. 1634

 H.Con.Res. 94

 S.Res. 566

 S.Res. 584

 S.Res. 585

## Executive Business (Friday, March  8)

 PN114

 PN870

 PN1218

 PN1403

 PN1404

 PN1406

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1764 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1764

      To require that amounts of assistance provided to financial 
 institutions under the Troubled Asset Relief Program of the Secretary 
   of the Treasury that are returned be used only for assistance for 
homeowners in accordance with the Making Home Affordable Program of the 
                               Secretary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2009

 Ms. Matsui (for herself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Berkley, and Ms. 
   Sutton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require that amounts of assistance provided to financial 
 institutions under the Troubled Asset Relief Program of the Secretary 
   of the Treasury that are returned be used only for assistance for 
homeowners in accordance with the Making Home Affordable Program of the 
                               Secretary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Homeowners in Distressed 
Communities Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF RETURNED AMOUNTS.

    Section 109 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Use of Returned Amounts for Homeowner Assistance.--
            ``(1) Limitation on use.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of this title or any other law, the Secretary may not 
        use any amounts of assistance provided under this title to or 
        for any financial institution that, prior to any use of such 
        amounts, are voluntarily returned to the Secretary, except that 
        such amounts may be used, as provided under this title, to 
        refinance and modify mortgages of homeowners in accordance with 
        the Making Home Affordable Program established by the 
        Secretary.
            ``(2) Allocation.--Any returned amounts used in accordance 
        with paragraph (1) shall be allocated for such use only for 
        areas disproportionately affected by home mortgage 
        foreclosures, as determined by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
# CE2009184EN.01011501.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/115 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/115

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008Installation of lighting and light-signalling devices on wheeled agricultural and forestry tractors (codified version) ***I

P6_TA(2008)0039

P6_TA(2008)0039

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 February 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices on wheeled agricultural and forestry tractors (codified version) (COM(2007)0192 — C6-0108/2007 — 2007/0066(COD))

2009/C 184 E/24

(Codecision procedure: codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0192),

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0108/2007),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0022/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 304.24 Equipment—Federal financial participation.

Claims for Federal financial participation in the cost of equipment under the Child Support Enforcement Program are to be determined in accordance with subpart G of 45 CFR part 95. Requirements concerning the management and disposition of equipment under the Child Support Enforcement Program are also prescribed in subpart G of 45 CFR part 95.

[47 FR 41576, Sept. 21, 1982]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1043

In Re: CHARLES DOGAN, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

(2:96-cr-00066-1)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 27, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Dogan, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Dogan, Jr., filed a petition for an original 

writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1997 conviction for 

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. This court 

ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions filed 

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006), and this case provides no reason 

to depart from the general rule. Moreover, we find that the 

interests of justice would not be served by transferring the 

case to the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006); Fed. 

R. App. P. 22(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, J. Scott Blouin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conexant Systems,Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Conexant Systems, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Quarterly Report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this Quarterly Report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Reportis being prepared;  b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this QuarterlyReport based on such evaluation; and  c.  disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: May 9, 2005   /s/ J. Scott Blouin    J. Scott Blouin  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 55 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) and Amendment No. 772 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The
      Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    June 5, 2020
#### § 400.40 Scope.

This subpart sets forth requirements concerning the immigration status and identification of eligible applicants for assistance under title IV of the Act.
Exhibit 99.1
------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of California Molecular
Electronics Corporation for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, James
Marek, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of California Molecular
Electronics Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

     (1)  such Form Type of California Molecular Electronics Corporation for the
          nine months ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of California Molecular
          Electronics Corporation for the nine months ended September 30, 2002,
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of California Molecular Electronics Corporation.



/s/  James  Marek,  Jr.
-----------------------
James  Marek,  Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer



November 12, 2002


<PAGE>
§ 2556.505 How do summer associates differ from other VISTAs? Summer associates differ from other VISTAs in the following ways: ( a ) Summer associates are not eligible to receive: ( 1 ) Health care through a health benefits program provided by AmeriCorps;
( 2 ) Childcare support through a childcare program provided by AmeriCorps;
( 3 ) Payment for settling-in expenses; or
( 4 ) Non-competitive eligibility in accordance with 5 CFR 315.605.
( b ) Absent extraordinary circumstances, summer associates are not eligible to receive: ( 1 ) Payment for travel expenses incurred for travel to or from the project site to which the summer associate is assigned; or
( 2 ) A relocation travel allowance to offset the cost of relocating from the summer associate's home of record to the project site to which they are assigned to serve.
( c ) AmeriCorps may discharge a summer associate due to a deficiency, or deficiencies, in conduct or performance. Summer associates are not subject to subpart E of this part, or to the grievance procedures provided to VISTAs set forth in §§ 2556.345 through 2556.365.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-117 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Washington January 17, 2006 

 with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Trade 

 Agreement signed at Washington January 17, 2006; 

 Entered into force January 17, 2006. 

 With annex.
# CE2009184EN.01011901.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/119 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/119

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codified version) *

P6_TA(2008)0045

P6_TA(2008)0045

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 February 2008 on the proposal for a Council directive on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codified version) (COM(2007)0587 — C6-0392/2007 — 2007/0206(CNS))

2009/C 184 E/30

(Consultation procedure: codification)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2007)0587),

having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0392/2007),

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

having regard to Rules 80 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0021/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the consultative working party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the consultative working party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1009 

________________________________________________________________________ 

PEACE CORPS 

 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ALBANIA 

Signed at Tirana July 22, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ALBANIA 

Peace Corps 

Agreement signed at Tirana July 22, 2003; 

 Entered into force October 9, 2003.
#### § 674.1 Purpose of regulations.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to implement the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, (16 U.S.C 2401 *et seq.*), and Article 7 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty done at Madrid on October 4, 1991. Specifically, this part is designed to ensure meteorites in Antarctica will be collected for scientific research purposes only and that U.S. expedition organizers to Antarctica who plan to collect meteorites in Antarctica will ensure that any specimens collected will be properly collected, handled, documented and curated to preserve their scientific value.