alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1634.9 Selection criteria. ( a ) The criteria to be used to select among qualified applicants shall include the following: ( 1 ) Whether the applicant has a full understanding of the basic legal needs of the eligible clients in the area to be served;
( 2 ) The quality, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the applicant's legal services delivery and delivery approach in relation to the Corporation's Performance Criteria and the American Bar Association's Standards for Providers of Civil Legal Services to the Poor, as evidenced by, among other things, the applicant's experience with the delivery of the type of legal assistance contemplated under the proposal;
( 3 ) Whether the applicant's governing or policy body meets or will meet all applicable requirements of the LSC Act, regulations, guidelines, instructions and any other requirements of law in accordance with a time schedule set out by the Corporation;
( 4 ) The applicant's capacity to comply with all other applicable provisions of the LSC Act, rules, regulations, guidelines and instructions, as well as with ethical requirements and any other requirements imposed by law. Evidence of the applicant's capacity to comply with this criterion may include, among other things, the applicant's compliance experience with the Corporation or other funding sources or regulatory agencies, including but not limited to Federal or State agencies, bar associations or foundations, courts, IOLTA programs, and private foundations;
( 5 ) The reputations of the applicant's principals and key staff;
( 6 ) The applicant's knowledge of the various components of the legal services delivery system in the State and its willingness to coordinate with the various components as appropriate to assure the availability of a full range of legal assistance, including: ( i ) its capacity to cooperate with State and local bar associations, private attorneys and pro bono programs to increase the involvement of private attorneys in the delivery of legal assistance and the availability of pro bono legal services to eligible clients; and
( ii ) its knowledge of and willingness to cooperate with other legal services providers, community groups, public interest organizations and human services providers in the service area;
( 7 ) The applicant's capacity to develop and increase non-Corporation resources;
( 8 ) The applicant's capacity to ensure continuity in client services and representation of eligible clients with pending matters; and
( 9 ) The applicant does not have known or potential conflicts of interest, institutional or otherwise, with the client community and demonstrates a capacity to protect against such conflicts.
( b ) In selecting recipients of awards for grants or contracts under this part, the Corporation shall not grant any preference to current or previous recipients of funds from the Corporation.
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
           HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HSA4 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:33 PM To: Ogulei, David Subject: FW: FYI

From: Bivins, Dan Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:05 AM
To: John Cooper Cc: Garnett, Kim Subject: RE: FYI

Here’s another one. Is this one true? Could you s ay a few sentences about how well it wokrd at Army? Any maintenance issues, etc.?
Dan



### EPA’s statements that the U.S. Army has successfull y installed and evaluated a multi-metals CEMS on on e of its hazardous waste incinerators, and that a multi- metals CEMS is an acceptable option in the MATS rul e (Statement of Basis at 24) are not correct. A hy pertext search of the MATS rule did not show any re ference to a multi-metals CEMS. Additionally, while it is corre ct that the U.S. Army purchased and installed three Xact units, none have ever been used for compliance with Subpart EEE.

From: John Cooper [ mailto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.com ] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:49 AM To: Bivins, Dan Subject: RE: FYI

Dan, Hoping is nice but reality is sometimes different - it rained all day yesterday and is currently rain ing.

I will have a response to the comment when you retu rn on Tuesday. John

From: Bivins, Dan [ mailto:Bivins.Dan@epa.gov ] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 7:00 AM To: John Cooper Subject: FYI

Will be on furlough tomorrow and Monday is a holida y for us. Enjoy your weekend! Hope not raining no w in Portland!

Dan

Dan Bivins U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Measurement Technology Group 919-541-5244
Case 2:08-cv-04887-HGB-ALC Document 109 Filed 03/22/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:08-cv-04887-HGB-ALC Document 109 Filed 03/22/11 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 70796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9582]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Neighborworks[supreg] America; Regular Meeting of the Board of 
Directors; Sunshine Act

Time & Date: 10 a.m. Thursday, December 7, 2006.

Place: 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

Status: Open.

Contact Person for More Information: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary, (202) 220-2372; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a9a1b1bab0acad83adb4edacb1a4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="09636b7b707a666749677e27667b6e">[email protected]</span></a>.

Agenda: 
    I. Call to Order.
    II. Approval of the Minutes.
    III. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.
    IV. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.
    V. Financial Report.
    VI. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report.
    a. Gulf Coast Rebuilding Initiative.
    b. NHSA Update.
    VII. Information Management Division Presentation.
    VIII. Adjournment.

Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9582 Filed 12-4-06; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 108.417 Fire pump components and associated equipment. ( a ) Each fire pump in a fire main system must have a relief valve on its discharge side that is set to relieve at 1.75 kilograms per square centimeter (approximately 25 pounds per square inch) in excess of the pump discharge pressure necessary to meet the pressure required in § 108.415 for the pump or 8.6 kilograms per square centimeters (approximately 125 pounds per square inch), whichever is greater. A relief valve may be omitted if the pump operating under shut off condition is not capable of developing the pressure described in § 108.415 plus 1.75 kilograms per square centimeter (25 pounds per square inch).
( b ) Each fire pump in a fire main system must have a pressure gauge on its discharge side.
( c ) Fire pumps may be used for other purposes. One of the required pumps must be kept available for use on the fire system at all times. If a fire pump is used in a system other than the fire main system, except for branch lines connected to the fire main for deck washing, each pipe connecting the other system must be connected to the pump discharge through a shut off valve at a manifold near the pump. If the fire pump exceeds the pressure in § 108.417(a), the pipe leading from the discharge manifold to other portions of the fire main system must have a reducing station and a pressure gauge in addition to the pressure gauge required by paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) If a fire pump has a reducing station, the relief valve required by paragraph (a) of this section for the pump and the additional pressure gauge required in paragraph (c) of this section must not be located on the discharge side of the reducing station.
( e ) An oil line must not be connected to a fire pump.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56808, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51208, Sept. 30, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# Date:

Week of March 5, 2007. 

# Place:

Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

# Status:

Public and Closed. 

# Additional Matters To Be Considered: 

 

## Week of March 5, 2007 

### Thursday, March 8, 2007 

9:55 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative) a. Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Early Site Permit for Clinton ESP) (Tentative). 

* * * * *

*                    The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)—(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Michelle Schroll, (301) 415-1662.                 

* * * * *

                    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at:                     *http:// www.nrc.gov/​about-nrc/​policy-making/​schedule.html.*

* * * * *

                    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability Program Coordinator, Deborah Chan, at 301-415-7041, TDD: 301-415-2100, or by e-mail at                     *DLC@nrc.gov.*                     Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.                 

* * * * *

                    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to                     *dkw@nrc.gov.*

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Michelle Schroll, 

Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-1005 Filed 3-1-07; 12:56 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 AM

To: 'apurwin@helinet.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA)

Subject: Alan Purwin

Dear Mr. Purwin: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0786). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your 

petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any 

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov. 

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the proposed UAS operation. The description should include 

the following: size and maximum weight (include payload) and whether the aircraft is fixed wing or 

rotorcraft. 

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed. 

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum. This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual. 

 Describe the proximity of the proposed operations to airports. 

 Your petition references an flight operations and procedures manual, however it was not submitted for 

the record. Please provide a copy of the manual. 

Please provide the additional information by December 22, 2014. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
§ 681.34 How are penalty and assessment amounts determined? ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the authority head, upon appeal, should evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence the ALJ and the authority head in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements;
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made;
( 3 ) The degree of the defendant's culpability with respect to the misconduct;
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed;
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the cost of the investigation;
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss;
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations;
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct;
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct;
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it;
( 11 ) Where the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude such misconduct;
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct;
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers;
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions;
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the Government of the United States or a state, directly or indirectly; and
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the authority head from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
# C_2008211EN.01004701.xml

| 19.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/47

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 (laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies) as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission’

COM(2008) 53 final — 2008/0030 (COD)

(2008/C 211/14)

On 22 February 2008 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 152(4)(b) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 (laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies) as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission.

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 (laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies) as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions, adopted on the 7 July 1999 (1) and on 9 March 2005 (2), it decided, at its 444th plenary session, held on 22 and 23 April 2008 (meeting of 22 April 2008), by 154 votes in favour and 2 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.

1

2

The opinion of the Committee on the regulatory procedure with scrutiny is currently under preparation [COM(2007) 741 final, COM(2007) 822 final, COM(2007) 824 final and COM(2008) 71 final].

Brussels, 22 April 2008.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---

(1)  Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation laying down rules for the prevention and control of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies’ — OJ C 258, 10 September 1999, p. 19.

1

Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation laying down rules for the prevention and control of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

(2)  Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies — COM(2004) 775 final’ — OJ C 234, 22.9.2005, p. 26-27.

2

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

COM(2004) 775 final

---
§ 506.4 Survivors entitled to award of detention benefits. In case of death of a civilian American citizen who would have been entitled to detention benefits under the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended, benefits will be awarded, if claim is made, only to the following persons: ( a ) Widow or husband if there is no child or children of the deceased;
( b ) Widow or dependent husband and child or children of the deceased, one-half to the widow or dependent husband and the other half to the child or children in equal shares;
( c ) The child or children of the deceased in equal shares if there is no widow or dependent husband, if otherwise qualified.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| · | the                  quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the                  “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                  and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | the                  information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                          |                                |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|  November                14, 2008 |                                                                               | /s/                Michael Novielli |
|                                   | Michael                NovielliInterim                Chief Executive Officer |

----
# Senate Floor Activity - Monday, January 27, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Monday, January 27)

H.Con.Res. 75

S. 1901

S. 1926

 14

S.Res. 337

S.Res. 338

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
#### § 81.73 Testimony.

Testimony shall be given orally under oath or affirmation by witnesses at the hearing; but the presiding officer, in his discretion, may require or permit that the direct testimony of any witness be prepared in writing and served on all parties in advance of the hearing. Such testimony may be adopted by the witness at the hearing, and filed as part of the record thereof. Unless authorized by the presiding officer, witnesses will not be permitted to read prepared testimony into the record. Except as provided in §§ 81.75 and 81.76, witnesses shall be available at the hearing for cross-examination.