alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 262.3 How will we determine if a State is subject to a penalty? ( a ) ( 1 ) We will use the single audit under 45 CFR part 75, subpart F, in conjunction with other reviews, audits, and data sources, as appropriate, to determine if a State is subject to a penalty for misusing Federal TANF funds (§ 263.10 of this chapter), intentionally misusing Federal TANF funds (§ 263.12 of this chapter), failing to participate in IEVS (§ 264.10 of this chapter), failing to comply with paternity establishment and child support requirements (§ 264.31 of this chapter), failing to maintain assistance to an adult single custodial parent who cannot obtain child care for a child under 6 (§ 261.57 of this chapter), failing to reduce assistance to a recipient who refuses without good cause to work (§ 261.54 of this chapter), and after October 1, 2007 failing to comply with work participation verification procedures (§ 261.64 of this chapter).
( 2 ) We will also use the single audit as a secondary method of determining if a State is subject to other penalties if an audit detects lack of compliance in other penalty areas.
( b ) ( 1 ) We will use the TANF Data Report required under part 265 of this chapter to determine if a State failed to meet participation rates (§§ 261.21 and 261.23 of this chapter) or failed to comply with the five-year limit on Federal assistance (§ 264.1 of this chapter).
( 2 ) Data in these reports are subject to our verification in accordance with § 265.7 of this chapter.
( c ) ( 1 ) We will use the TANF Financial Report (or, as applicable, the Territorial Financial Report) as the primary method for determining if a State has failed to meet the basic MOE requirement (§ 263.8 of this chapter), meet the Contingency Fund MOE requirement (§ 264.76 of this chapter), or replace SFAG reductions with State-only funds (§ 264.50 of this chapter).
( 2 ) Data in these reports are subject to our verification in accordance with § 265.7 of this chapter.
( d ) We will determine that a State is subject to the specific penalties for failure to perform if we find information in the reports under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section to be insufficient to show compliance or if we determine that the State has not adequately documented actions verifying that it has met the participation rates or the time limits.
( e ) To determine if a State has met its MOE requirements, we will also use the supplemental information in the annual report required in accordance with § 265.9(c) of this chapter.
( f ) States must maintain records in accordance with 45 CFR 75.361 through 75.370.
( g ) To determine if a State is subject to a penalty under § 262.1(a)(16), we will use the information provided in annual state reports at § 265.9(b)(10) of this chapter, in accordance with Section 409(a)(16) of the Social Security Act.
[64 FR 17890, Apr. 12, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 37481, June 29, 2006; 81 FR 2105, Jan. 15, 2016; 81 FR 3020, Jan. 20, 2016]
# PAC Table 7b

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 9/12/23.
Lines 6 & 7 Averages
James Turner/R6/USEPA/US To Rebamburg@aol.com 

:•* -" - 06/07/2007 01:46 PM cc Shawn Ghose/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Mark Peycke 

Subject Rogers Road EasemenVRCsS 

Bob, I have revised the Gentry instrument consistent with our discussions and done some reformatting 

and made minor non-substantive changes to comport. Please look at the Acknowledgement, as I have 

changed it to reflect the fact that Mrs. Gentry is now the owner as her husband is deceased. I have gone 

ahead and prepared a statement of existing uses of the property as exhibit B. Please look at that also, 

and discuss with the Gentry's if need be. 

Our RPM, Shawn Ghose is running the legal description on the 1.38 acre tract on GPS property records 

software to check it out. I will let you know as soon as that is complete, which should be by early next 

week. Otherwise, we should be about ready to go forward with this. Thanks and take care. 

SI H-1 

R oger sR dD r af (E asementOG0707, doc E lAtoR RE asemen(0G0707, doc ExBtoRRE asementOG0707, doc 

Iwl 

E xCloR R E asement060707, doc 

James L. Turner 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Regional Counsel (6RC-S) 

U.S. EPA Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Ste. 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

E-Mail: Turner.James@epa.gov 

Ph: (214)665-3159 

Fax:(214)665-6460 

Rebamburg@aol.com 

Rebamburg@aol.com 

06/05/2007 05:40 AM '^° James Turner/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 

cc 

Subject Re: Graham/Rogers Road legal 

Jim: 

The groundwater restriction sounds good to me, and Frederick and Mrs. Gentry are okay with it as well. If 

you'll include that and the other changes I mentioned in the previous email, I think we have a final version 

that is satisfactory to both ends. 

Let me know if you determine anything else needs to be included. Otherwise, email me the final version, 

and I'll pass it along to Frederick and Mrs. Gentry for review and approval. ^— "^ ~ 

' 9050338 

002312
Thanks, 

Bob

See what's free at AOL.com.

002313
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Lerchen, Dr.P.H., Associate Director, Office of Public Health Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D-72, Atlanta, GA 30030, Telephone (404) 639-4897.

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: December 30, 2005.

Alvin Hall,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 06-98 Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
#### Ellen F. Grealish, as Administratrix of the Estate of Isabella S. Grealish, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Brooklyn, Queens County and Suburban Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Grealish*v. Brooklyn, *Queens Go. é S. B. B. Go.,*130 App. Div. 238, affirmed.

(Argued December 13, 1909;

decided January 4, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment, entered January 14, 1909, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which reversed an order of the trial court setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial and directed the reinstatement of the verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant’s negligence.

*D. A. Marsh*and *George D. Yeomans*for appellant.

*Patrick L. Ryan*and *William Brunner*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J.,' Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.
#### Thomas Mauger, *Respondent, v.*John Harrison and another, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Brady, J.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 14-5249 September Term, 2015

 FILED ON: MARCH 1, 2016

INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, A COLORADO NONPROFIT CORPORATION,

APPELLANT

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

APPELLEE

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:14-cv-01500)

Before: GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court denying the request for

a three-judge district court be reversed; the judgment of the District Court in favor of the FEC be

vacated; and the case be remanded to the District Court with instructions to initiate the procedures to

convene a three-judge district court, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed herein this date.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows

Deputy Clerk

Date: March 1, 2016

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh, with whom Circuit Judge Griffith joins.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Wilkins.

USCA Case #14-5249 Document #1601519 Filed: 03/01/2016 Page 1 of 1
§ 618.140 Dissemination of policy. ( a ) *Notification of policy.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall implement specific and continuing steps to notify applicants for admission and employment, students and parents of elementary and secondary school students, employees, sources of referral of applicants for admission and employment, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient, that it does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational programs or activities that it operates, and that it is required by Title IX and these Title IX regulations not to discriminate in such a manner. Such notification shall contain such information, and be made in such manner, as the designated agency official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by Title IX and these Title IX regulations, but shall state at least that the requirement not to discriminate in education programs or activities extends to employment therein, and to admission thereto unless §§ 618.300 through 618.310 do not apply to the recipient, and that inquiries concerning the application of Title IX and these Title IX regulations to such recipient may be referred to the employee designated pursuant to § 618.135, or to the designated agency official.
( 2 ) Each recipient shall make the initial notification required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section within 90 days of September 29, 2000 or of the date these Title IX regulations first apply to such recipient, whichever comes later, which notification shall include publication in: ( i ) Newspapers and magazines operated by such recipient or by student, alumnae, or alumni groups for or in connection with such recipient; and
( ii ) Memoranda or other written communications distributed to every student and employee of such recipient.
( b ) *Publications.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall prominently include a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section in each announcement, bulletin, catalog, or application form that it makes available to any person of a type, described in paragraph (a) of this section, or which is otherwise used in connection with the recruitment of students or employees.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not use or distribute a publication of the type described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that suggests, by text or illustration, that such recipient treats applicants, students, or employees differently on the basis of sex except as such treatment is permitted by these Title IX regulations.
( c ) *Distribution.* Each recipient shall distribute without discrimination on the basis of sex each publication described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and shall apprise each of its admission and employment recruitment representatives of the policy of nondiscrimination described in paragraph (a) of this section, and shall require such representatives to adhere to such policy.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00430-CV

PHILLIP VALLEJO AND BRENDA 

VALLEJO

APPELLANTS

AND APPELLEES

V.

CITY OF KENNEDALE APPELLEE

AND APPELLANT

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal And 

Cross Appeal.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; 

therefore, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeals shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for 

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. 

DELIVERED: May 12, 2011
§ 606.60 Communications. ( a ) The Foundation shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The Foundation shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the Foundation. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the Foundation shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The Foundation need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the Foundation communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunications devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The Foundation shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The Foundation shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the Foundation to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where Foundation personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the Foundation has the initial burden of establishing that compliance with § 606.60 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Foundation Director or his or her designee after considering all Foundation resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the Foundation shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conexant
Systems, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 9, 2003

/s/ Dwight W. Decker

Dwight W. Decker
Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Balakrishnan S. Iyer

Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4(f)



         Summary of Addendum to the Lease Agreement for Herzliya Business
         Park, Building D, between VocalTec Communications Ltd. and Gemel
         Tsu'a Lehashka'ot Ltd. entered into, on June 19, 2002.

         VocalTec Communications Ltd. and Gemel Tsu'a Lehashka'ot Ltd. entered
         into, on June 19, 2002, an Addendum to the Lease Agreement for
         Herzliya Business Park, Building D, between the parties dated July
         20, 1998.

         According to the Addendum, the term of the lease was extended until
         January 31, 2005. Effective as of February 1, 2002, the rent was
         amended such that for the period between February 1, 2002 and May 1,
         2003, the rent is $10.90 (NIS 52) per square meter per month, between
         May 1, 2003 and August 1, 2004, the rent is $13.50 (NIS 64) per
         square meter per month, and between August 1, 2004 and January 31,
         2005, the rent is $14.40 (NIS 68) per square meter per month.

         The premises leased during the extended period are the same premises
         leased under the original agreement, excluding 800 square meters on
         the third floor that were returned to the lessor on June 15, 2002.

         The cost of parking is $88 (NIS 417.60) per parking space per month
         for up to 173 parking spaces (an additional 17 parking spaces are
         added at no additional cost).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SPEECHNOW.ORG, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 08-248 (JDB)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

 Defendant.

AMENDED JUDGMENT

The D.C. Circuit, in its opinion of March 26, 2010, held that the statues and regulations

that limit the contributions the individual plaintiffs may make to SpeechNow.org, and the

contributions SpeechNow.org may accept, violate the First Amendment. In accordance with that

opinion, the accompanying March 26, 2010 Judgment, and the May 3, 2010 Mandate from the

Court of Appeals, this Court therefore enters final judgment and declares and adjudges (1) that

the contribution limits set forth in certified questions 1, 2, and 3 (2 U.S.C. §§ 441a(a)(1)(C) and

441a(a)(3)), and any regulations implementing those limits, cannot be constitutionally applied

against SpeechNow.org, the individual plaintiffs, and others who wish to contribute to

SpeechNow.org; and (2) that there is no constitutional infirmity in the application of the

organizational, administrative and reporting requirements set forth in certified questions 4 and 5.

This Court also orders that Defendant is permanently enjoined from enforcing the

contribution limits set forth in certified questions 1, 2, and 3 (2 U.S.C. §§ 441a(a)(1)(C) and

441a(a)(3)), and any regulations implementing those limits, against SpeechNow.org, the

-1-

Case 1:08-cv-00248-JDB Document 85 Filed 10/29/10 Page 1 of 2
individual plaintiffs, and others who wish to contribute to SpeechNow.org.

The May 27, 2010 Judgment previously issued by this Court is hereby vacated and

superseded.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

 JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Dated: October 28, 2010 

-2-

Case 1:08-cv-00248-JDB Document 85 Filed 10/29/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 95.505 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*State agency costs* include all costs incurred by or allocable to the State agency except expenditures for financial assistance, medical vendor payments, and payments for services and goods provided directly to program recipients such as day care services, family planning services or household items as provided for under the approved State program plan.

*Cost allocation plan* means a narrative description of the procedures that the State agency will use in identifying, measuring, and allocating all State agency costs incurred in support of all programs administered or supervised by the State agency.

*FFP* or *Federal financial participation* means the Federal Government's share of expenditures made by a State agency under any of the programs cited in § 95.503.

*Operating Divisions* means the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) organizational components responsible for administering public assistance programs. These components are the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

*Public assistance programs* means the programs cited in § 95.503.

*State* means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam.

*State agency* means the State agency administering or supervising the administration of the State plan for any program cited in § 95.503. A State agency may be an organizational part of a larger State department that also contains other components and agencies. Where that occurs, the expression *State agency* refers to the specific component or agency within the State department that is directly responsible for the administration of, or supervising the administration of, one or more programs identified in § 95.503.

*State Plan* means a comprehensive written commitment by the State agency to administer or supervise the administration of any of the public assistance programs cited in § 95.503 in accordance with all Federal requirements.

[47 FR 17509, Apr. 23, 1982, as amended at 75 FR 66336, Oct. 28, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

     In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
B.O.S Better Online Solutions Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the
State of Israel (the "COMPANY"), for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to such officer's knowledge, that:

1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


By:       /S/ Adiv Baruch               By:       /S/ Nehemia Kaufman
          ---------------                         -------------------
            Adiv Baruch                              Nehemia Kaufman
President and Chief Executive Officer           Chief Financial Officer


Date:  January 6, 2005




                                       24