alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/30/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 95-7133

v. (D.C. No. CV-95-24-C)

CLARENCE EDWARD CODY, (E.D. Okla. )

Defendant - Appellant.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

We affirm for the reasons given by the district court. 
2

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Rate Commission

# Agency:

Postal Rate Commission.

# Time and Date:

Thursday, December 14, 2006, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

Commission conference room 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Decision in Docket No. N2006-1, Evolutionary Network Realignment.

# Contact Person For More Information:

                        Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, Postal Rate Commission, 202-789-6820 or                         *ssharfman@prc.gov*.                    

Dated: December 7, 2006.

Steven W. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9640 Filed 12-7-06; 12:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal property. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Cooperative Multicenter Reproductive Medicine Network.                     

*Date:*                         March 26-27, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1487,                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1027 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Argued and submitted May 17,

reversed and remanded with instructions June 26,

petition for review denied September 24,1996 (324 Or 229)

#### STATE ex rel COPELAND SAND AND GRAVEL, INC., an Oregon corporation, *Respondent, v.*William Bruce BARTOW, Planning Director of Josephine County, Oregon; Planning Commission of Josephine County, Oregon; and Board of County Commissioners of Josephine County, Oregon, *Respondents, and*MURPHY CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, *Intervenor-Appellant.*

(92-CV-0206; CA A87361)

919 P2d 48

Matthew G. Fawcett argued the cause and filed the briefs for intervenor-appellant.

James R. Dole argued the cause for respondent Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc.

*528No appearance by respondent William Bruce Bartow.

No appearance by respondent Planning Commission of Josephine County, Oregon.

No appearance by respondent Board of County Commissioners of Josephine County, Oregon.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

WARREN, P. J.

*530WARREN, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this mandamus action pursuant to ORS 215.428(7), to compel the defendant county officials to issue a development permit for which plaintiff had applied. Intervenor opposed the permit. Plaintiff and defendants entered into a stipulation whereby the county agreed to issue the permit, subject to certain conditions. The permit was subsequently issued. Although intervenor did not join in the stipulation, the trial court entered a judgment, which recites that the matter is moot and holds, *inter alia,*that “[further consideration of the Writ, including intervenor’s motion to dismiss, is denied.”1

Intervenor appeals. Although it asks for extensive relief in its brief, at oral argument intervenor confined the remedy it seeks on appeal and asks only that we sustain its assignment that the trial court erred by failing “expressly” to dismiss the alternative writ and the action.

We agree with intervenor. The case is moot. The act that plaintiff sought to compel has been performed in a manner that it has stipulated is satisfactory to it. Although intervenor could arguably make a strong case for a remand to enable it to exercise the right to participate in the action that was cut off by the court’s response to the other parties’ settlement, see *Wallace v. Board of County Commissioners,*105 Or App 364, 804 P2d 1220 (1991), intervenor is not pursuing that argument. Moreover, even if it were to pursue and prevail on the argument, obtaining the ability to defend in a mandamus action against the compulsion of an act that has already been performed would be a futile triumph.

In sum, nothing further can happen in this action. It is moot, and the appropriate disposition is a judgment of dismissal.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter amended judgment dismissing action.

1

 We conclude that the judgment is appealable. If it is not “final,” it would nevertheless come within our jurisdiction under ORS 19.010(2)(a).
§ 1627.6 Transfers to other recipients. ( a ) The requirements of this part apply to all subgrants from one recipient to another recipient.
( b ) The subrecipient must audit any funds or property or services acquired in whole or in part with LSC funds provided by the recipient under a subgrant in its annual audit and supply a copy of this audit to the recipient. The recipient must either submit the relevant part of this audit with its next annual audit or, if an audit has been recently submitted, submit it as an addendum to that recently submitted audit.
( c ) In addition to the provisions of § 1627.4(c)(3), LSC may hold the recipient responsible for any disallowed expenditures of subgrant funds. Thus, LSC may recover all of the disallowed costs from either the recipient or the subrecipient or may divide the recovery between the two. LSC's total recovery may not exceed the amount of expenditures disallowed.
§ 5.2 Presumption of openness and proactive disclosures. ( a ) We will administer the FOIA with a presumption of openness. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(8) we will disclose records or information exempt from disclosure under the FOIA whenever disclosure would not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption and disclosure is not prohibited by law. We also will consider whether partial disclosure of information is possible whenever we determine that a full disclosure of a requested record is not possible. This includes taking reasonable steps to segregate and release nonexempt information.
( b ) Records that the FOIA requires agencies to make available for public inspection in an electronic format may be accessed through each OpDiv's and Staff Div's Web site. Each OpDiv and StaffDiv is responsible for determining which of its records must be made publicly available (including frequently requested records), for identifying additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting and indexing such records. Each OpDiv and StaffDiv must ensure that its Web site of posted records and indices is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. Each OpDiv and StaffDiv has a FOIA Requester Service Center or FOIA Public Liaison who can assist individuals in locating records. A list of agency FOIA Public Liaisons is available at *http://www.foia.gov/report-makerequest.html .*
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Cou 

Compliance Advice 

Joshua Blume 

Attorney 

February 24, 2014 

SUBJECT; Preliminary Audit Report - Buddy Roemer for President, Inc. (LRA 877) 

The Office of General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Preliminary Audit Report on 

Buddy Roemer for President, Inc. We concur with the findings in the Preliminary Report (Net 

Outstanding Campaign Obligations and Reporting of Debts and Obligations). If you have any 

questions, please contact Joshua Blume, the attorney assigned to this audit' 

' The Office of General Counsel recommends that the Commission consider this document in Executive 

Session because the Commission may eventually decide to pursue, an investigation of matters contained in the 

proposed Report. 11 C.F.R. § 2.4(a) and (bX6).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Switch & Data Facilities Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, George Pollock, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 22, 2010



|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    GEORGE POLLOCK,
JR.                                                                    
|George Pollock, Jr.                                                                           
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
§ 33.1 Purpose, authority, and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part prescribes the Department's standards and procedures for the collection of debts owed by Federal employees to the United States through involuntary salary offset.
( b ) *Authority.* 5 U.S.C. 5514; 5 CFR part 550, subpart K.
( c ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This part applies to internal and Government-wide collections of debts owed by Federal employees by administrative offset from the current pay account of the debtor without his or her consent.
( 2 ) The procedures contained in this part do not apply to any case where an employee consents to collection through deduction(s) from the employee's pay account, or to debts arising under the Internal Revenue Code or the tariff laws of the United States, or where another statute explicitly provides for, or prohibits, collection of a debt by salary offset (e.g., travel advances in 5 U.S.C. 5705 and employee training expenses in 5 U.S.C. 4108).
( 3 ) This part does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of an erroneous payment under 5 U.S.C. 5584, 10 U.S.C. 2774, or 32 U.S.C. 716, or in any way questioning the amount or validity of a debt, in the manner prescribed by the Secretary. Similarly, this part does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of the collection of a debt under any other applicable statutory authority.
( 4 ) Nothing in this part precludes the compromise of the debt, or the suspension or termination of collection actions, in accordance with part 30 of this title.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AgroCan  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carl  Yuen,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Carl  Yuen


Carl Yuen
Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2002


                                       17
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1713 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1713

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
              LABORATORY, LANE, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The South Central Agricultural Research 
Laboratory of the Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and redesignated as the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research 
Laboratory''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the South Central 
Agricultural Research Laboratory shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research Laboratory''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WES WATKINS POST OFFICE, BENNINGTON, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 310 North Perry Street in Bennington, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Wes Watkins Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wes 
Watkins Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1713

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.
```
# Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice

# Memorandum for the Attorney General 

                        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq*., I hereby order that:                    

**Section 1.***Order of Succession.*                         During any period when the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and the officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, the following officers of the Department of Justice, in the order listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, if they are eligible to act as Attorney General under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General:                    

United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York;

United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; and

United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas.

**Sec. 2.***Exceptions.*                         (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this memorandum.                    

                        (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq*., to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Attorney General.                              ( print page 74754)    

**Sec. 3.**                         The Memorandum for the Attorney General of March 19, 2002, entitled “Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice,” is hereby revoked.                    

**Sec. 4.**                         The Attorney General is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

[FR Doc. 06-9691

Billing code 4410-19-M
§ 265.2 What definitions apply to this part? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 53876 , June 28, 2024.
( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the general TANF definitions at §§ 260.30 through 260.33 and the definitions of a work-eligible individual and the work activities in § 261.2 of this chapter apply to this part.
( b ) For data collection and reporting purposes only, family means: ( 1 ) All individuals receiving assistance as part of a family under the State's TANF or separate State program (including noncustodial parents, where required under § 265.5(g)); and
( 2 ) The following additional persons living in the household, if not included under paragraph (b)(1) of this section: ( i ) Parent(s) or caretaker relative(s) of any minor child receiving assistance;
( ii ) Minor siblings of any child receiving assistance; and
( iii ) Any person whose income or resources would be counted in determining the family's eligibility for or amount of assistance.
[71 FR 37482, June 29, 2006]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2411

MOHSEN KHORDEHFOROSH,

Party-in-Interest - Appellant,

and

MOE’S RX CLINIC, INC.,

Debtor,

v.

ANNA COTTON WRIGHT,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00628-GCM)

Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohsen Khordehforosh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mohsen Khordehforosh appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 

appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the Chapter 7 bankruptcy case filed 

by Moe’s Rx Clinic, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Khordehforosh v. 

Wright, No. 3:17-cv-00628-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2017). We deny Khordenforosh’s 

pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED