alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 81.91 Official transcript.

The Department will designate the official reporter for all hearings. The official transcripts of testimony taken, together with any exhibits, briefs, or memoranda of law filed therewith shall be filed with the Department. Transcripts of testimony in hearings may be obtained from the official reporter by the parties and the public at rates not to exceed the maximum rates fixed by the contract between the Department and the reporter. Upon notice to all parties, the presiding officer may authorize corrections to the transcript which involve matters of substance.
#### § 75.408 Limitation on allowance of costs.

The Federal award may be subject to statutory requirements that limit the allowability of costs. When the maximum amount allowable under a limitation is less than the total amount determined in accordance with the principles in this part, the amount not recoverable under the Federal award may not be charged to the Federal award.
# CE2010045EN.01018601.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 45/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 45/186

---

Deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay ***I

P6_TA(2008)0630

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit Guarantee Schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay (COM(2008)0661 — C6-0361/2008 — 2008/0199(COD))

(2010/C 45 E/58)

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0661), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0661),

| — | having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 47(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0361/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 47(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0361/2008),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0494/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0494/2008),

1.   Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2.   Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3.   Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2008)0199

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 18 December 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2009/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/14/EC.)

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

)

SHAUN McCUTCHEON, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 12-1034 (JRB, RLW, JEB)

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) MOTION TO DISMISS 

)

Defendant. )

)

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant Federal Election Commission respectfully moves the Court to dismiss this 

case for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). As 

grounds for this motion, the Commission refers to (and incorporates by reference herein) its 

Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 16) (“FEC Inj. Br.”), in 

which the Commission demonstrated the constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign 

Act’s aggregate biennial limit on campaign contributions by individuals, 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3). 

Specifically, as demonstrated in the Commission’s prior brief, plaintiffs’ claims fail as a 

matter of law because:

 In Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), the Supreme Court upheld the aggregate 

contribution limit as a constitutional means of furthering the government’s important 

interest in reducing actual and apparent political corruption. (FEC Inj. Br. at 7-9.)

 The aggregate limit continues to further the government’s anti-corruption interest by 

preventing massive contributions from circumventing and undermining individual 

contribution limits. (FEC Inj. Br. at 12-15 (discussing Cal. Med. Ass’n v. FEC, 453 

U.S. 182 (1981); FEC v. Colo. Republican Federal Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 

Case 1:12-cv-01034-JEB-JRB-RLW Document 21 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 2
2

(2001); McConnell v. FEC, 540 U.S. 93 (2003)), 19-21 (discussing potential for 

massive aggregate contributions), 28-29 (discussing contributions to non-party 

political committees), 30-33 (discussing contributions to candidates).)

 The aggregate limit furthers the government’s anti-corruption interest by limiting

contributors’ ability to use contributions to national political parties to exert actual or 

apparently corrupt influence over federal officeholders. (FEC Inj. Br. at 23-26 

(discussing Colorado Republican, McConnell, and Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 

698 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D.D.C. 2010) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 130 S. Ct. 3544 

(2010)).)

For the foregoing reasons and all the others discussed in the Commission’s prior 

memorandum, the Commission requests that the Court dismiss this action with prejudice after

the consolidated motion hearing currently scheduled for September 6, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

Anthony Herman (D.C. Bar No. 424643)

General Counsel

David Kolker (D.C. Bar No. 394558)

Associate General Counsel

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628)

Special Counsel to the General Counsel

 /s/ Adav Noti

Adav Noti (D.C. Bar No. 490714)

Acting Assistant General Counsel

anoti@fec.gov

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street NW

Washington, DC 20463

August 20, 2012 (202) 694-1650

Case 1:12-cv-01034-JEB-JRB-RLW Document 21 Filed 08/20/12 Page 2 of 2
§ 75.211 Public access to Federal award information. ( a ) In accordance with statutory requirements for Federal spending transparency (*e.g.,* FFATA), except as noted in this section, for applicable Federal awards the HHS awarding agency must announce all Federal awards publicly and publish the required information on a publicly available OMB-designated government-wide Web site (at time of publication, *www.USAspending.gov*).
( b ) All information posted in the designated integrity and performance system accessible through SAM (currently FAPIIS) on or after April 15, 2011 will be publicly available after a waiting period of 14 calendar days, except for: ( 1 ) Past performance reviews required by Federal Government contractors in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 42.15;
( 2 ) Information that was entered prior to April 15, 2011; or
( 3 ) Information that is withdrawn during the 14-calendar day waiting period by the Federal Government official.
( c ) Nothing in this section may be construed as requiring the publication of information otherwise exempt under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), or controlled unclassified information pursuant to Executive Order 13556.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3015, Jan. 20, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,637
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,105
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,073
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,169
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        107,406
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,973
<DEPOSITS>                                     151,632
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,461
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,448
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 173,973
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,486
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,002
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   739
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,227
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,886
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,029
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,198
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    383
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         383
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       246
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.21
<LOANS-NON>                                        849
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,424
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      101
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,365
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,365
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,365


</TABLE>
# CE2010015EN.01013902.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 15/139 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 15/139

---

Wednesday 22 October 2008Promotion of clean road transport vehicles ***I

P6_TA(2008)0509

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 October 2008 on the revised proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of clean and energy efficient road transport vehicles (COM(2007)0817 — C6-0008/2008 — 2005/0283(COD))

2010/C 15 E/44

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the revised Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0817),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0008/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0291/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Wednesday 22 October 2008P6_TC1-COD(2005)0283

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 22 October 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2009/33/EC.)

---
§ 615.5 Legal proceedings between private litigants: Testimony and production of documents. ( a ) No employee may produce official records and information or provide any testimony in response to a demand or request unless authorized to do so by the General Counsel in accordance with this part.
( b ) The General Counsel, in his or her discretion, may grant an employee permission to testify or produce official records and information in response to a demand or request. In making this decision, the General Counsel shall consider whether: ( 1 ) The purposes of this part are met;
( 2 ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
( 3 ) NSF has an interest in the decision that may be rendered in the legal proceeding; and
( 4 ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in the best interest of NSF or the United States.
( c ) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, shall not: ( 1 ) Disclose confidential or privileged information;
( 2 ) Testify as to facts when the General Counsel determines such testimony would not be in the best interest of the Foundation or the United States; or
( 3 ) Testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of the Foundation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COM. EX REL. GREGORY STOVER,

Petitioner

v.

PRESIDENT JUDGE SHEILA WOODS

SKIPPER, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 64 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED . The

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
§ 502.5 Records generally available. The Commission will make promptly available to any member of the public the following documents: ( a ) Proposed and Final Decisions (including dissenting opinions) and all orders made with respect thereto, except when exempted from public disclosure by statute;
( b ) Statements of policy and interpretations which have been adopted by the Commission which have not been published in the Federal Register; and
( c ) A current index, which will be updated at least quarterly, covering the foregoing material adopted, issued or promulgated after July 4, 1967. Publication of an index is deemed both unnecessary and impractical. However, copies of the index are available upon request for a fee of the direct cost of duplication.
# CE2009184EN.01011001.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/110

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008Request for defence of the immunity of Claudio Fava

P6_TA(2008)0047

P6_TA(2008)0047

European Parliament decision of 19 February 2008 on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Claudio Fava (2007/2155(IMM))

2009/C 184 E/19

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the request by Claudio Fava for defence of his immunity in connection with civil proceedings brought against him before the Marsala Civil Court, of 29 May 2007, announced in plenary sitting on 6 June 2007,

having heard Claudio Fava in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 (1) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

1

having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0007/2008),

| 1. | Decides to defend the immunity and privileges of Claudio Fava; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to defend the immunity and privileges of Claudio Fava;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authorities of the Italian Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of its committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authorities of the Italian Republic.

---

(1)  Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391.

1

Wagner

Fohrmann and Krier

Wybot

Faure and others

---
§ 310.15 What are the safeguards and processes that comprehensive Tribal IV-D agencies must have in place to ensure the security and privacy of Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems and Office Automation? ( a ) *Information integrity and security.* The comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency must have safeguards on the integrity, accuracy, completeness, access to, and use of data in the Computerized Tribal IV-D System and Office Automation. Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems and Office Automation should be compliant with the Federal Information Security Management Act, and the Privacy Act. The required safeguards must include written policies and procedures concerning the following: ( 1 ) Periodic evaluations of the system for risk of security and privacy breaches;
( 2 ) Procedures to allow Tribal IV-D personnel controlled access and use of IV-D data, including: ( i ) Specifying the data which may be used for particular IV-D program purposes, and the personnel permitted access to such data;
( ii ) Permitting access to and use of data for the purpose of exchanging information with State and Tribal agencies administering programs under titles IV-A, IV-E and XIX of the Act to the extent necessary to carry out the comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency's responsibilities with respect to such programs;
( 3 ) Maintenance and control of application software program data;
( 4 ) Mechanisms to back-up and otherwise protect hardware, software, documents, and other communications; and,
( 5 ) Mechanisms to report breaches or suspected breaches of personally identifiable information to the Department of Homeland Security, and to respond to those breaches.
( b ) *Monitoring of access.* The comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency must monitor routine access to and use of the Computerized Tribal IV-D System and Office Automation through methods such as audit trails and feedback mechanisms to guard against, and promptly identify, unauthorized access or use;
( c ) *Training and information.* The comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency must have procedures to ensure that all personnel, including Tribal IV-D staff and contractors, who may have access to or be required to use confidential program data in the Computerized Tribal IV-D System and Office Automation are adequately trained in security procedures.
( d ) *Penalties.* The comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency must have administrative penalties, including dismissal from employment, for unauthorized access to, disclosure or use of confidential information.
#### § 75.105 Effect on other issuances.

For Federal awards subject to this part, all administrative requirements, program manuals, handbooks and other non-regulatory materials that are inconsistent with the requirements of this part are superseded upon implementation of this part by the HHS awarding agency, except to the extent they are required by statute or authorized in accordance with the provisions in § 75.102.
#### § 75.432 Conferences.

A conference is defined as a meeting, retreat, seminar, symposium, workshop or event whose primary purpose is the dissemination of technical information beyond the non-Federal entity and is necessary and reasonable for successful performance under the Federal award. Allowable conference costs paid by the non-Federal entity as a sponsor or host of the conference may include rental of facilities, speakers' fees, costs of meals and refreshments, local transportation, and other items incidental to such conferences unless further restricted by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. As needed, the costs of identifying, but not providing, locally available dependent-care resources are allowable. Conference hosts/sponsors must exercise discretion and judgment in ensuring that conference costs are appropriate, necessary and managed in a manner that minimizes costs to the Federal award. The HHS awarding agency may authorize exceptions where appropriate for programs including Indian tribes, children, and the elderly. See also §§ 75.438, 75.456, 75.474, and 75.475.