alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 108.101 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subchapter with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 877-909-2786, *http://www.astm.org*. ( 1 ) ASTM D 93-97, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester, IBR approved for § 108.500(b).
( 2 ) ASTM F 1014-92, Standard Specification for Flashlights on Vessels, IBR approved for § 108.497(b).
( 3 ) ASTM F1121-87 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Specification for International Shore Connections for Marine Fire Applications, (approved March 1, 2010), IBR approved for § 108.427(a).
( c ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) Resolution A.520(13), Code of Practice for the Evaluation, Testing and Acceptance of Prototype Novel Life-saving Appliances and Arrangements, 17 November 1983, IBR approved for § 108.105(c).
( 2 ) Resolution A.649(16), Code for the Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODU Code),19 October 1989 with amendments of June 1991, IBR approved for § 108.503.
( 3 ) Resolution A.658(16), Use and Fitting of Retro-reflective Materials on Life-saving Appliances, 20 November 1989, IBR approved for §§ 108.645(a) and 108.649(a) and (e).
( 4 ) Resolution A.760(18), Symbols Related to Life-saving Appliances and Arrangements, 17 November 1993, IBR approved for §§ 108.646(a), 108.647, 108.649(b), (d), (f), and (g), and 108.655(e).
( d ) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169, 617-770-3000, *http://www.nfpa.org*. ( 1 ) NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2010 Edition, effective August 26, 2009, IBR approved for § 108.430.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48266, July 22, 2016]
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74
37 38 39 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★

■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★
● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
§ 86.16 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which subpart C applies which: ( 1 ) Admitted only students of one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted only students of one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of subpart C unless it is carrying out a transition plan approved by the United States Commissioner of Education as described in § 86.17, which plan provides for the elimination of such discrimination by the earliest practicable date but in no event later than June 23, 1979.
(Secs. 901, 902, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682)
§ 10.201 General characteristics of the merchant mariner credential. ( a ) A merchant mariner credential (MMC) (Coast Guard Form CG-4610), is a credential combining the elements of the merchant mariner's document (MMD), merchant mariner's license (license), and certificate of registry (COR) enumerated in 46 U.S.C. subtitle II part E as well as the STCW endorsement issued pursuant to the STCW Convention and STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see § 10.103 of this part). MMDs, licenses, STCW endorsements and CORs are no longer issued as separate documents and all qualifications formerly entered on those separate documents appear in the form of an endorsement(s) on an MMC.
( b ) An MMC authorizes the holder to serve in any capacity endorsed thereon, or in any lower capacity in the same department, or in any capacity covered by a general endorsement.
( c ) An MMC may be issued to qualified applicants by the Coast Guard.
[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11216, Mar. 16, 2009, as amended by USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77888, Dec. 24, 2013]
§ 75.111 English language. ( a ) All Federal financial assistance announcements and Federal award information must be in the English language. Applications must be submitted in the English language and must be in the terms of U.S. dollars. If the HHS awarding agency receives applications in another currency, the HHS awarding agency will evaluate the application by converting the foreign currency to United States currency using the date specified for receipt of the application.
( b ) Non-Federal entities may translate the Federal award and other documents into another language. In the event of inconsistency between any terms and conditions of the Federal award and any translation into another language, the English language meaning will control. Where a significant portion of the non-Federal entity's employees who are working on the Federal award are not fluent in English, the non-Federal entity must provide the Federal award in English and the language(s) with which employees are more familiar.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Phiroz Meherwan Boyce v. Zarine Boyce

Appellate case number: 01-21-00166-CV

Trial court case number: 474053

Trial court: Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 20, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

The panel consists of Justices Landau, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: January 26, 2023
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Michigan Community Bancorp Limited
(the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, J. William Sumner, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/      J. William Sumner
-----------------------------------------------
         J. William Sumner
         Chief Executive Officer
         December   ,
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A17-05 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Kelly for ) 

Congress ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Laura E. Sinram, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election 

Conunission, do hereby certify that on June 28,2018, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Kelly for 

Congress, as recommmded in the Memorandum fiom the Chief Compliance 

Officer and Audit Division dated June 25,2018. 

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively 

for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date Laura a E. E. Sinram Sinram CJ 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In ihe Matter of 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Caesars Entertainment Corporation 

Political Action Cominittee 

A12-01 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretaiy of the Federal Election Commission, 

do hereby certify that on January 09,2014, the Commission decided by a vote 

of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the Caesars Entertainment 

Corporation PAC, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated January 6,2014. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted afBrmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

ate . Shelley E. 

Deputy Secretaiy of the Commission
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Earl B. Hill, Appellant.

(Submitted December 10, 1909;

decided December 17, 1909.)

Motion to enlarge time for argument under section 536 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

*William H. Sullivan*for appellant.

*James P. Hill, District Attorney,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This is a case in. which the judgment appealed from is of death, and in which the statute requires that the appeal must be brought on for argument within six months from the taking thereof unless the court for good cause shown shall enlarge the time for that purpose. (Code Crim. Proc. § 536.)

The appellant was sentenced to death on the 8th day of May, 1909. The appeal was taken on June 15th, 1909. Counsel for the appellant now asks that the time for the argument of the appeal be enlarged until March next on the ground that he has been' unable as yet to procure the stenog*533rapher’s minutes of the trial. He states that he ordered the minutes from Lewis A. Carroll, the official stenographer, on May 6th, 1909, and that the trial court directed the said stenographer to comply with his order, but the minutes have not yet been furnished either to the counsel for the appellant or to the district attorney of Chenango county, although both have from time to time urged that the minutes should be furnished as soon as possible. The excuse given is that the stenographer has had extra work since the trial by reason of the fact that he has had to act in place of another stenographer in the district who has been ill and consequently unable to attend the courts. This statement is confirmed by an affidavit from the stenographer himself, who adds that the testimony in the case will amount to something like two thousand folios, which he will probably be able to deliver within two or three weeks from December 1st, 1909.

While neither the counsel for the appellant nor the district attorney appears to be at fault, we think that the excuse suggested in behalf of the official stenographer is insufficient. The summer vacation has intervened since the trial, and during that period no other of his official duties ought to have been regarded as more important than the transcription of the minutes in this case. He does not appear to have been ill himself, and no reason is given why he could not then have done this work. If stenographers will not promptly perform their duties in cases of this character, their refusal or omission to do so without adequate excuse constitutes good cause for discipline.

It is suggested that three months will be required to print the record after the minutes are furnished ; but we think that, with due diligence on the part of counsel, the case ought to be prepared and ready for argument by the 14th day of February next, and we will enlarge the time until that date. The application is, therefore, granted to the extent indicated.

All concur.

Ordered accordingly.
§ 640.2 Committee on Environmental Matters. ( a ) There is established an NSF Committee on Environmental Matters (hereafter referred to as the Committee) to consist of one representative from each directorate. The General Counsel, or his or her designee, shall serve as Chairman. At the discretion of the Chairman and with the concurrence of the Committee, additional members may be appointed.
( b ) All incoming correspondence from CEQ and other agencies concerning matters related to NEPA, including draft and final environmental impact statements, shall be brought to the attention of the Chairman. The Chairman will prepare or, at his or her discretion, coordinate replies to such correspondence.
( c ) The Committee shall meet regularly to discuss NSF policies and practices regarding NEPA, and make recommendations on the need for or adequacy of environmental impact assessments or statements.
( d ) With respect to actions of NSF, the Committee will: ( 1 ) Maintain a list of actions for which environmental impact statements are being prepared.
( 2 ) Revise this list at regular intervals, based on input from the directorates, and send revisions to CEQ.
( 3 ) Make the list available for public inspection on request.
( 4 ) Maintain a list of environmental impact assessments.
( 5 ) Maintain a file of draft and final environmental impact statements.
( e ) The Committee and/or the Chairman will perform such additional functions as are set forth elsewhere in this part and in other NSF issuances.
[45 FR 40, Jan. 2, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 37596, Sept. 25, 1984; 59 FR 37438, July 22, 1994]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

March 12, 2007.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, March 22, 2007.

Place: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The Commission will hear oral argument in the 
matter United Mine Workers of America on behalf of Local 1248, District 
2 v. Maple Creek Mining, Inc., Docket No. PENN 2002-23-C. (Issues 
include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in denying the 
operator's motion for summary decision on the ground that a withdrawal 
order issued to the operator pursuant to section 104(b) of the Mine Act 
could not be contested pursuant to section 105(a), and thus became 
final for purposes of the compensation provisions of section 111 when 
it was not contested under section 105(d) within 30 days of its 
issuance.)
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.

Contact Person for more Information: Jean Ellen; (202) 434-9950/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sandra G. Farrow,
Acting Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 07-1401 Filed 3-19-07; 11:54 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Brooklyn Children’s Aid Society, Respondent, *v.*George C. Hendrickson et ah, Composing the Board of Education of the Huntington Union School, Appellants.

*People ex rel. Brooklyn Children’s Aid Socy.*v. *Hendrickson,*125 App. Div. 256, affirmed.

(Argued October 19, 1909;

decided November 9,1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 27, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term *552granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to admit one Howard Wisbauer as a pupil in the Huntington Union School.

*Thomas Yo'tmg*for appellants.

*William G. Ooohe*and *Howard 0. Wood*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscook, JJ. Taking no part: Willard Bartlett, J.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 2013** 

**- NM** 
**- 0**  **6 8** 
**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009�1231

Integrated Multibeam and LIDAR Bathymetry Data Offshore of New London and Niantic, Connecticut

----

## Conversion Factors 

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		                                    URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1231/html/conversion.html		Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact		Page Last Modified: Monday, 12-Jul-2010 02:17:59 EDT
§ 411.101 Sexual abuse and sexual harassment incident reviews. ( a ) Care provider facilities must conduct sexual abuse or sexual harassment incident reviews at the conclusion of every investigation of sexual abuse or sexual harassment and, where the allegation was either substantiated or unable to be substantiated but not determined to be unfounded, prepare a written report recommending whether the incident review and/or investigation indicates that a change in policy or practice could better prevent, detect, or respond to sexual abuse and sexual harassment. The care provider facility must implement the recommendations for improvement or must document its reason for not doing so in a written response. Both the report and response must be forwarded to ORR's Prevention of Sexual Abuse Coordinator. Care provider facilities also must collect accurate, uniform data for every reported incident of sexual abuse and sexual harassment using a standardized instrument and set of definitions.
( b ) Care provider facilities must conduct an annual review of all sexual abuse and sexual harassment investigations and resulting incident reviews to assess and improve sexual abuse and sexual harassment detection, prevention, and response efforts. The results and findings of the annual review must be provided to ORR's Prevention of Sexual Abuse Coordinator.
#### § 159.100 Basis and scope.

This part establishes provisions governing a Web portal that will provide information on health insurance coverage options in each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. It sets forth data submission requirements for health insurance issuers. It covers the individual market and the small group market.
§ 73.735-507 Acceptance of travel and subsistence. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, employees may accept accommodations, subsistence, and travel in cash or in kind in connection with official travel for attendance at meetings, conferences, training in non-Governmental facilities or for performing advisory services, if approved in accordance with the provisions of the HHS Travel Manual. (5 U.S.C. 4111; 42 U.S.C. 3506)
( b ) Employees may not accept accommodations, subsistence, or travel in cash or in kind in connection with official travel from a non-Governmental source with which they have official dealings unless Government or commercial travel and/or accommodations are not available. If travel and/or subsistence is accepted for official travel under these circumstances, such acceptance and the basis for it must be reported in writing to the Head of the Principal Operating Component or Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget for the Office of the Secretary.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)


(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)





I, Brian Kletscher, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Highwater Ethanol, LLC;





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date:May 21, 2014/s/ Brian KletscherBrian Kletscher, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
AGENDA

Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to 

Heat and Hot Environments

Meeting: Taft Auditorium

Robert A. Taft Laboratories, 4676 Columbia Pkwy., Cincinnati, OH 45226

Thursday, February 13, 2013, 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.*

*Please note that the public meeting will end after this agenda has been 

completed, even if that time is before 4:00 pm.

9:00 – 9:05 a.m. Introductions and Description of Meeting 

Procedures

T.J. Lentz, Ph.D.

Education and Information 

Division, NIOSH

9:05 – 9:15 a.m. Welcome and Overview Paul Schulte, Ph.D.

Director, Education and 

Information Division, NIOSH

9:15 – 9:45 a.m. Presentation on the Background and Key 

Points of the Draft NIOSH Criteria for a 

Recommended Standard

Brenda Jacklitsch, M.S.

Education and Information 

Division, NIOSH

9:45 – 10:00 a.m. Questions/Answers of Clarification for the 

Previous Presentation

Audience/NIOSH Panelists

10:00 – 10:15 a.m. Break

10:15 a.m. Public Opportunities to Provide Comment

 Sammy Almashat (Public Citizen)

12:00 – 1:00 p.m. Break for Lunch (if necessary)

1:00 p.m. Additional Public Opportunities to Provide Comment (if necessary)

(following the last 

public comment)

Additional Questions/Answers of Clarification Paul Schulte, Ph.D. and

NIOSH Panelists

Prior to 4:00 p.m. Concluding Remarks, Summary of Next Steps, 

and Adjournment

T.J. Lentz, Ph.D.

NOTE: For remote participation via teleconference, those who have registered with the NIOSH Docket 

Office (niocindocket@cdc.gov) should use the following dial-in number and passcode. Teleconference 

participants will be muted to avoid distractions during presentations, and then unmuted periodically to 

allow opportunities for questions or comment. This teleconference number may not guarantee access for 

international callers. 

Dial-in number: 877-664-7856

Passcode: 9670230

Post Meeting ADDENDUM: The public meeting started at 9:00 a.m. and ended at approximately 10:00 a.m. 

Those unable to call in or attend in person had the opportunity to submit public comments through the NIOSH 

Docket or regulations.gov through February 25, 2014.
#### § 108.301 Stability.

Each unit must meet the requirements in Subchapter S of this chapter that apply to Mobile Offshore Drilling Units.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51008, Nov. 4, 1983]