alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 605.45 Housing. ( a ) *Housing provided by the recipient.* A recipient that provides housing to its nonhandicapped students shall provide comparable, convenient, and accessible housing to handicapped students at the same cost as to others. At the end of the transition period provided for in subpart C, such housing shall be available in sufficient quantity and variety so that the scope of handicapped students' choice of living accommodations is, as a whole, comparable to that of nonhandicapped students.
( b ) *Other housing.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students shall take such action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing is, as a whole, made available in a manner that does not result in discrimination on the basis of handicap.
CLARK HILL 

Charies R. Spies 

T 202.572.8663 

F 202.572.8683 

Email: cspiesOciarlchill.com 

Claric Hill PLC 

1250 Eye Street NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

T 202.772.0909 

F 202.772.0919 

clarkhill.com 

September 6,2011 

Sheraline L. Thomas 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

VIA EMAIL: SHThomas@fec.gov 

Re: New Hampshire Republican State Committee; 

Response to Draft Final Audit Report 

Dear Ms. Thomas, 

The New Hampshire Republican State Committee ("NHRSC") is in receipt of your 

August 15, 2011 letter enclosing tiie draft fmal audit report on the audit of NHRSC for the 2007-

2008 election cycle. 

NHRSC does not believe that a hearing before the Commission conceming this matter is 

necessary; therefore, NHRSC waives its right to a hearing in this matter. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 

directly at (202) 572-8663. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Charles R. Spies 

Counsel to the New Hampshire Republican State 

Committee 

cc: Alex Boniewicz 

aboniewicz@fec.gov 

7245882.1 36952/144524
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Ci r**  **cuit**

__________________________ BEN R. CARRILLO , Petitioner
,

v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , Respondent

.

__________________________
201 3- 310 5

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Prote ction Board in No. DE333 012 00 88 -I-1.

_____________________________ ON MOTION

______________________________ O R D E R
Ben R. Carrillo moves for reinstatement of his pet ition for review

. The court notes that hi s petition for review was di smissed on July 31 , 2013 for failure to file his brief

. The court also notes that Mr. Carrillo submitted his opening brief on August 13, 2013. Upon consideration thereof
, Case: 13-3105 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 08/21/2013BEN CARRILLO v. DHS 2
I T IS ORDERED THAT : (1) The motion is granted. T he mandate is recalled, the court’s dismissal o r der is vacated, and the petition is reinstated. (2) Mr. Carrillo’s opening brief is accepted for filing. DHS should calculate the due date for its response brief from the date of filing of this order.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s 21 Case: 13-3105 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 08/21/2013
#### § 75.335 Contract provisions.

The non-Federal entity's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in appendix II to this part.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Civics [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.136/8:

Item Number:0455-Q-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000857024
 
1998 | 2006| 2010
 
March 3, 2020
§ 502.7 Additional documents and records generally available for inspection and copying. The following types of documents are also available for inspection and copying in the offices of the Commission: ( a ) Rules of practice and procedure.
( b ) Annual report of the Commission to the Congress of the United States.
( c ) Bound volumes of Commission decisions.
( d ) International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, with amendments; the War Claims Act of 1948, with amendments; and related Acts.
( e ) Claims agreements with foreign governments effecting the settlement of claims under the jurisdiction of the Commission.
( f ) Press releases and other miscellaneous material concerning Commission operations.
( g ) Indexes of claims filed in the various claims programs administered by the Commission.
# CE2009294EN.01009401.xml

| 3.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 294/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 294/94

---

Tuesday 8 July 2008Conservation of wild birds (adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny)***I

P6_TA(2008)0318

European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 July 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission, Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds (COM(2008)0105 — C6-0088/2008 — 2008/0038(COD))

2009/C 294 E/27

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2008)0105),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0088/2008),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0259/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
****EXHIBIT 32.2****

 

****IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION****

 

****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane J. Ryan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | **/s/   ** Diane  J. Ryan |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Diane J. Ryan                                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                       |
|   |                                          |
|   | February 22, 2005                        |

 

----
**Exhibit
      99.2**





CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB of Mackenzie
      Taylor Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Terry
      Stimpson, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.








November 27,
      2007


TERRY
      STIMPSON


Terry
      Stimpson


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director











-1-
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIANO LOPEZ,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES A. YATES, Warden; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-17356

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00107-LJOGBC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Emiliano Lopez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of his

right to access the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

FILED

SEP 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17356

review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d

443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We vacate and remand. 

The district court dismissed Lopez’s access to courts claim because he failed

to allege that defendants actions or inactions prevented him from pursuing a

challenge to his sentence or conditions of confinement. However, the district court

did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d

1090, 1102-04 (9th Cir. 2011), in which we explained that prisoners have access to

court rights to litigate without active interference claims that have a reasonable

basis in law or fact. As the district court noted, Lopez alleged an access to court

claim based on defendants’ alleged interference with his ability to litigate in family

court. Furthermore, Lopez clarified in his objections to the Findings and

Recommendation that his “interference” access to court claim is his sole claim. 

Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.

Lopez shall bear his own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of
PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                      |  |                             |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 27, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan |  |                            
|                        |  |  |  |                      |  | Michael Gilligan            |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |                      |  | Principal Financial Officer |  |
#### § 81.1 Scope of rules.

The rules of procedure in this part supplement §§ 80.9 and 80.10 of this subtitle and govern the practice for hearings, decisions, and administrative review conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services, pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (section 602, 78 Stat. 252) and part 80 of this subtitle.
#### § 81.13 Exclusion from hearing for misconduct.

Disrespectful, disorderly, or contumacious language or contemptuous conduct, refusal to comply with directions, or continued use of dilatory tactics by any person at any hearing before a presiding officer shall constitute grounds for immediate exclusion of such person from the hearing by the presiding officer.
## Aircraft Information

DJI Phantom 2 Vision +

Type: Quad

- Copter

Weight: 1242g (Including payload)

DJI Phantom 3 Professional

Type: Quad

- Copter

Weight: 1280g (Including payload)

DJI Inspire 1

Type: Quad

- Copter

Weight: 2935g (Including payload)
§ 800.202 Rating factors. ( a ) *Permissible rating factors.* In proposing premiums for each MSP option, an MSP issuer must use only the rating factors permitted under section 2701 of the PHS Act.
( b ) *Application of variations based on age or tobacco use.* Rating variations permitted under section 2701 of the PHS Act must be applied by an MSP issuer based on the portion of the premium attributable to each family member covered under the coverage in accordance with any applicable Federal or State laws and regulations implementing section 2701(a) of the PHS Act.
( c ) *Age rating.* For age rating, an MSP issuer must use the ratio established by the State in which the MSP option is offered, if it is less than 3:1. ( 1 ) *Age bands.* An MSP issuer must use the uniform age bands established under HHS regulations implementing section 2701(a) of the PHS Act.
( 2 ) *Age curves.* An MSP issuer must use the age curves established under HHS regulations implementing section 2701(a) of the PHS Act, or age curves established by a State pursuant to HHS regulations.
( d ) *Rating areas.* An MSP issuer must use the rating areas appropriate to the State in which the MSP option is offered and established under HHS regulations implementing section 2701(a) of the PHS Act.
( e ) *Tobacco rating.* An MSP issuer must apply tobacco use as a rating factor in accordance with any applicable Federal or State laws and regulations implementing section 2701(a) of the PHS Act.
( f ) *Wellness programs.* An MSP issuer must comply with any applicable Federal or State laws and regulations implementing section 2705 of the PHS Act.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

April 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00054

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF V.H., A CHILD

,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 01656 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s attorney has filed his fifth motion for extension of time to file the brief in this appeal from the termination of appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s brief was originally due on March 9, 2016.

Due to the numerous extensions of time allowed, the motion is granted in part. Appellant’s brief must be filed on or before April 29, 2016. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS
OF TIME WILL BE ALLOWED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 27th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
# Senate Floor Activity - Monday, February 10, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Monday, February 10)

S. 1954

S. 1963

 26

S.Res. 339

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 64 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to ‘‘The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: Prevention and Elimination of Digital Discrimination’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. BUDD, Mr. MARSHALL, 

Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CRAMER, 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. 

RISCH, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. FISCHER, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. MORAN, and 

Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Communications Commission relating to 

‘‘The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: Prevention and Elimination of Digital Discrimination’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to ‘‘The Infra5 structure Investment and Jobs Act: Prevention and ElimiVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:11 Mar 15, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ64.IS SJ64

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 64 IS 

1 nation of Digital Discrimination’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 4128 

2 (January 22, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force 

3 or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 2105.58 How are decisions on appeals issued? ( a ) A decision on an appeal must be made in writing.
( b ) A decision that upholds the Agency's determination in whole or in part must contain a statement that identifies the reasons for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision must provide you with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit and will inform you of the dispute resolution services offered by the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) of the National Archives and Records Administration as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If the Agency's decision is remanded or modified on appeal, the Agency will notify you of that determination in writing. The Agency will then further process the request in accordance with that appeal determination and will respond directly to you.
( c ) Dispute resolution is a voluntary process. If the Agency agrees to participate in the dispute resolution services provided by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
§ 672.24 Maximum civil monetary penalties for violations. ( a ) For violations occurring prior to August 1, 2016, the maximum civil penalty is $6500 for any violation and $11,000 for knowing violations.
( b ) For violations occurring after August 1, 2016, but before January 1, 2017, the maximum civil penalty is adjusted to $16,250 for any violation and $27,500 for knowing violations.
( c ) For violations occurring on or after January 1, 2017, the maximum penalty, which may be assessed under part 672 of the title, is the larger of: ( 1 ) The amount for the previous calendar year, or
( 2 ) An amount adjusted for inflation, calculated by multiplying the amount for the previous calendar year by the percentage by which the CPI-U for the month of October preceding the current calendar year exceeds the CPI-U for the month of October of the calendar year two years prior to the current calendar year, adding that amount to the amount for the previous calendar year, and rounding the total to the nearest dollar.
( d ) Notice of the maximum penalty which may be assessed under part 672 of this title for calendar years after 2016 will be published by the NSF in the Federal Register on an annual basis on or before January 15 of each calendar year.
[81 FR 41452, June 27, 2016]
§ 309.150 What start-up costs are allowable for Tribal IV-D programs carried out under § 309.65(b) of this part? Federal funds are available for costs of developing a Tribal IV-D program, provided that such costs are reasonable, necessary, and allocable to the program. Federal funding for Tribal IV-D program development under § 309.65(b) may not exceed a total of $500,000, unless additional funding is provided pursuant to § 309.16(c). Allowable start-up costs and activities include: ( a ) Planning for the initial development and implementation of a Tribal IV-D program;
( b ) Developing Tribal IV-D laws, codes, guidelines, systems, and procedures;
( c ) Recruiting, hiring, and training Tribal IV-D program staff; and
( d ) Any other reasonable, necessary, and allocable costs with a direct correlation to the initial development of a Tribal IV-D program, consistent with the cost principles in 45 CFR part 75, subpart E, and approved by the Secretary.
[69 FR 16672, Mar. 30, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016]