alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM 

March 16,2018 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Stalf Director 

Audit Division 

FROM:. Erin Chlopak (^dC* 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Forman M JT 

Attomey 

SUBJECT: Proposed Interim Audit Report on Mike Bishop for Congress (LRA 1068) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

("proposed lAR") on Mike Bishop for Congress. The proposed lAR contains one finding: 

Reporting of Debts and Obligations.' We concur with the finding. If you have any questions, 

please contact Margaret J. Forman, the attomey assigned to this audit. 

' We recommend that the Commission consider this document in Executive Session because the 

Commission may eventually decide to pursue an investigation of matters contained in the proposed lAR. 

n C.F.R.§§ 2.4(a) and (b)(6).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT @¥ilfJf.AJI 8 p 12: 2@ 

CENTRAL DIVISION TRICT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JEREMY JOHNSON 

Defendant. 

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 

FOR W AIYER OF LOCAL. 

COUNSEL RULES AND ON 

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO 

DISMISS COMPLAINT 

Case No. 2:15cv439 

Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Waiver of Local 

Counsel Rules [Dkt 4]; and (2) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plainitffs Complaint (As 

Improperly Filed By An Attorney Not Licensed or Admitted in Utah) [Dkt 13]. 

On June 18, 2015, the Chief Judge of this Court, David Nuffer, granted FEC 

attorneys Harry J. Summers, Kevin Deeley, Kevin P. Hancock and Lisa J. Stevenson certificates 

of special provisional admission to the bar for the District of Utah for purposes of this case. On 

June 19, 2015, the FEC filed the Complaint [Dkt 2] and its present motion which specifically 

asks the Court to waive the associate local counsel requirements of DUCivR 81-1.1 ( d) and allow 

the FEC to represent itself directly and provide that service of papers in this case be made 

Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 16 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 2
directly upon it, citing 52 U.S.C. sections 30107(a)(6), (b), 30109, 30110; 26 U.S.C. sections 

9010, 9040. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint arguing it was improperly filed 

by an attorney not licensed or admitted in Utah. 

Having considered the facts, law and written argument of the parties, the Court 

hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion and DENIES Defendant's motion. 

DATED this ~ay of October, 2015. ii' 1)~ I')~~ JJ-.---

Dee Benson 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 16 Filed 10/08/15 Page 2 of 2
# Cou r t of Appea l s of t h e S ta te of

Geor gi a

A TLA N TA ,_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The C o u rt o f Appea ls h ereb

y p a s s es the fo llo wi

n g order:

A25A04 19

. N U BIYN M ZE KE W E v. LE S LIE S

. S P IVE Y et a l

.

I n this ac tio n f

o r t resp a ss, nu isanc e, a nd related c laims, the trial c o urt granted

su mma r y j u d gment to the d ef end ants in an o r d er entered on Febru ary 9 , 2024. On

Tu esd ay, M arc h 1 2, 2024, p laintif f N u biyn M z ek ew e f

iled a no tic e of a p p eal. W e lac k j u risd ic tio n. A no tic e o f ap p eal mu s t be f iled “ w ithin 30 d ays af

ter entry” o f the trial

c o u rt o rd er so u ght t o be ap p ealed

. OCGA § 5- 6 -38 ( a). T he p ro p er a nd t imely f iling

o f a no tic e o f ap peal is an abso lu te requ irement to c o nf er ap pellate j urisd ic tio n o n this

Co u rt. Perlma n v

. Perlma n , 31 8 Ga. A p p

. 7 31 , 7 39 (4) (7 34 SE2d 5 6 0) (201 2).

M z ek ew e’ s no tic e of ap p eal w as u ntimely f iled 32 d a ys a f ter entry o f

the Febru ary 9

o rd er. 1 Co nsequ ently, this ap p eal is hereby D I SM I SSED f o r lac k o f j u risd ic tio n.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

.

1 While M z e k ew e asserts in his no t ic e o f ap p eal that the o rd er he seek s to ap p eal

“ was no t d eliv e red ” u ntil Febru ary 1 3, 2024, it w as s tamp ed “ f iled ” by the su p erio r

c o u rt c lerk o n Febru ary 9

. See S ha rp v. S ta te , 1 83 Ga. A p p

. 6 41 , 6 42 (1 ) ( 36 0 SE2d 50) (1 9 87 ) (an o rd er is “ entered ” f o r p u rp o ses o f OCGA § 5

- 6

- 38 ( a) when “ it is red u c ed

to w riting, signed by the j u d ge, and f iled w ith the c lerk ” ).

October 04, 2024

10/04/2024
#### § 612.11 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this part will be construed to entitle any person, as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-17 

Proposed Final Audit Rqxwt on the ) 

Conservative Mqority Fdnd ) 

CERTIPICATiaN 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Cleik of the Federal Election 

Commiaaion, do hereto certify that on December 06,2017, the Conuniasiaa 

decided by a vote of 5-0 to ^>prove the Propoaed Final Audit Report on the 

Conservative Majority Fund, as recommended in the Memozandum firom the 

Chief Conqdiance OfiGcer and die Audit Division dated November 16,2017. 

Commiasioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraidi voted 

afiGmudvely for the decision. 

Attest: 

H Dale Dayna C. Brown 

Secretary and Cleric of the Coimniaaion
§ 2507.19 Circumstances in which fees may not be charged. ( a ) If AmeriCorps fails to comply with the time limits for responding to a request, and if no unusual or exceptional circumstances, as defined by the FOIA, apply to processing the request, it may not charge search fees (or, for requesters with preferred fee status, may not charge duplication fees).
( b ) If AmeriCorps fails to comply with the extended time limit for unusual circumstances under § 2705.10(c), it may not charge search fees (or, for requesters with preferred fee status, may not charge duplication fees), except as follows: ( 1 ) If unusual circumstances apply and more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the request, AmeriCorps may charge search fees (or, for requesters with preferred fee status, may charge duplication fees), so long as AmeriCorps has given the requester timely written notice and has discussed with the requester via email, telephone, or paper mail (or made at least three good-faith attempts to do so) how the requester could limit the scope of the request.
( 2 ) If a court determines that exceptional circumstances exist, AmeriCorps' failure to comply with a time limit will be excused for the length of time provided by the court order.
( c ) AmeriCorps will charge search or review fees for a quarter-hour period only when more than half of that period is required for search or review.
( d ) AmeriCorps will not charge any fee if the total fee calculated according to § 2507.18 is $25.00 or less for any request.
EX-33 (f)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB
SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Perod"), with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the "CFR"), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c),
(d)(4)(ii), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
respect to the transactions covered by this report (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(4)(vii) and
(d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the
Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of
these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions
covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed
after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after
January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as
of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that
the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the
Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole except for as
discussed below:

Standard                Description
1122(d)(1)(i)   The Asserting Party has not instituted policies and procedures
                to specifically monitor performance or other triggers or
                events of default stated in the transaction agreements
1122(d)(1)(iv)  During the months of July, August, and September, the Company's
                minimum coverage requirement exceeded its $160 million fidelity
                bond by amounts ranging up to approximately $1.3 million.
1122(d)(3)(i)(A)The Asserting Party did not maintain or provide one of the
                required monthly reports stated in the transaction agreements
                during the year
1122(d)(3)(i)(D)The Asserting Party did not perform procedures to agree the
                unpaid principal balance and number of loans serviced by the
                Asserting Party with that of the investors or trustees

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/ Terence W. Edwards
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Mark Danahy
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Martin L. Foster
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President - Loan Servicing
§ 605.34 Educational setting. ( a ) *Academic setting.* A recipient to which this subpart applies shall educate, or shall provide for the education of, each qualified handicapped person in its jurisdiction with persons who are not handicapped to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the handicapped person. A recipient shall place a handicapped person in the regular educational environment operated by the recipient unless it is demonstrated by the recipient that the education of the person in the regular environment with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. Whenever a recipient places a person in a setting other than the regular educational environment pursuant to this paragraph, it shall take into account the proximity of the alternate setting to the person's home.
( b ) *Nonacademic settings.* In providing or arranging for the provision of nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess periods, and the services and activities set forth in § 605.37(a)(2), a recipient shall ensure that handicapped persons participate with nonhandicapped persons in such activities and services to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the handicapped person in question.
( c ) *Comparable facilities.* If a recipient, in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, operates a facility that is identifiable as being for handicapped persons, the recipient shall ensure that the facility and the services and activities provided therein are comparable to the other facilities, services, and activities of the recipient.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: THURSDAY, JULY 13, 2023 AT 10:30 A.M.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH

FLOOR) AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

HOSPITAL ADMISSION LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE 

ABOVE-REFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 HOSPITAL 

ADMISSION LEVEL AND CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES.

TO ACCESS THE MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE 

www.fec.gov AND CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Steve Daines for 

Montana (A21-04)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2023-04: Guy for Congress

Proposed Directive Regarding Congressional Referrals

Proposed Agency Procedure Regarding Litigation Brought Pursuant to 52 

U.S.C. § 30109(a)(8)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: June 30, 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

______________________________________

)

ROBERT C. MCCHESNEY, in his official 

capacity as Treasurer of Bart McLeay for 

U.S. Senate, Inc., et al.,

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

No. 8:16-cv-168-LSC-FG3

MATTHEW S. PETERSON [sic], in his 

official capacity as Chair of the Federal 

Election Commission, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

MOTION TO DISMISS

______________________________________ )

MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANTS MATTHEW S. 

PETERSEN AND THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Defendant Matthew S. Petersen, in his official capacity as Chair of the Federal Election 

Commission, and defendant Federal Election Commission, through their undersigned counsel, 

move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to 

state a claim. In support of this motion, defendants Petersen and the Commission rely upon the 

accompanying memorandum of points and authorities, including the exhibits attached thereto.

Respectfully submitted,

Daniel A. Petalas 

Acting General Counsel

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel

8:16-cv-00168-LSC-FG3 Doc # 21 Filed: 06/20/16 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 47
2

Kevin Deeley

Acting Associate General Counsel

Erin Chlopak

Acting Assistant General Counsel

/s/ Robert W. Bonham III

Robert W. Bonham III 

Senior Attorney

June 20, 2016 FOR DEFENDANTS

MATTHEW S. PETERSEN AND 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20463

(202) 694-1650

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on June 20, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sends notification of such filing to the following 

CM/ECF participant in this case: 

L. Steven Grasz, Esq., Husch Blackwell, LLP, 13330 California Street, Suite 200, 

Omaha, NE 68154 (attorney for plaintiffs Robert C. McChesney, in his official capacity 

as Treasurer of Bart McLeay for U.S. Senate, Inc., and Bart McLeay for U.S. Senate, 

Inc.).

I also hereby certify that a copy of the same has been served by regular mail, postage 

prepaid, to the following non-CM/ECF participants: None.

/s/ Robert W. Bonham III

Robert W. Bonham III 

Senior Attorney

8:16-cv-00168-LSC-FG3 Doc # 21 Filed: 06/20/16 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 48
#### Catharine H. Marx *v.*Edward McGlynn.

Allowance of $2,000 granted. Opinion

*Per Q'ivriam.*
#### §§ 605.15-605.20 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Application of Adolphe H. Benott, Respondent, to Have a Certain Judgment Canceled and Discharged of Record. Darsa J. Densmore et al., Appellants.

*Matter of Benoit,*124 App. Div. 142, affirmed.

(Submitted January 7, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1908, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by a discharged bankrupt for the cancellation of a certain judgment and granted such motion.

*Claude Gignoux*and *William J. Reid*for appellants.

*Edward Herrmann*for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Semescence and Stem Cells.
    Date: March 10, 2007.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: James Harwood, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5168, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1256, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0c8c1d2d7cfcfc4cae0c3d3d28ecec9c88ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3dbd2c1c4dcdcd7d9f3d0c0c19ddddadb9dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1034 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 411.14 Limits to cross-gender viewing and searches. ( a ) Cross-gender pat-down searches of UCs must not be conducted except in exigent circumstances. For a UC that identifies as transgender or intersex, the ORR care provider facility must ask the UC to identify the gender of staff with whom he/she would feel most comfortable conducting the search.
( b ) All pat-down searches must be conducted in the presence of one additional care provider facility staff member unless there are exigent circumstances and must be documented and reported to ORR.
( c ) Strip searches and visual body cavity searches of UCs are prohibited.
( d ) Care provider facilities must permit UCs to shower, perform bodily functions, and change clothing without being viewed by staff, except: In exigent circumstances; when such viewing is incidental to routine room checks; is otherwise appropriate in connection with a medical examination or monitored bowel movement; if a UC is under age 6 and needs assistance with such activities; a UC with special needs is in need of assistance with such activities; or the UC requests and requires assistance. If the UC has special needs and requires assistance with such activities, the care provider facility staff member must be of the same gender as the UC when assisting with such activities.
( e ) Care provider facilities must not search or physically examine a UC for the sole purpose of determining the UC's sex. If the UC's sex is unknown, it may be determined during conversations with the UC, by reviewing medical records, or, if necessary, learning that information as part of a broader medical examination conducted in private by a medical practitioner.
( f ) Care provider facilities must train youth care worker staff in proper procedures for conducting pat-down searches, including cross-gender pat-down searches and searches of transgender and intersex UCs. All pat-down searches must be conducted in a professional and respectful manner, and in the least intrusive manner possible, consistent with security needs and existing ORR policy, including consideration of youth care worker staff safety.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated June 9, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2032 contained in Amendment No.
2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-238873) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


June 9, 2020
#### The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, *v.*The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Brooklyn Heights B. B. Oo.*v. *Brooklyn Oity B. B. Oo.,*124 App. Div. 896, affirmed.

(Argued June 8, 1909;

decided October 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 3, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action by a lessee to recover from the lessor the cost of construction of a certain building.

*William O. Be Witt*for appellant.

*Edward W.*Hatch, *John L. Wells*and *George D. Yeomans*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
# Den Europæiske Unions C 94A/28.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 94A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 50. årgang28. april 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 94A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

50. årgang28. april 2007

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| 2007/C 094A/01 | Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve: Forskningsleder — Prognosticeringsekspert — Reference: EF/TA/07/02 (EUT C 68 A af 24.3.2007) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

2007/C 094A/01

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve: Forskningsleder — Prognosticeringsekspert — Reference: EF/TA/07/02 (EUT C 68 A af 24.3.2007)

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

| 28.4.2007 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 94/1

---

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve: Forskningsleder — Prognosticeringsekspert — Reference: EF/TA/07/02

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 68 A af 24. marts 2007
  )

(2007/C 94 A/01)

Side 4, overskrift V. INDGIVELSE AF ANSØGNINGER:

I stedet for:

»— senest den 20. april 2007«

læses:

»— senest den 1. juni 2007«.

---