alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 286.25 How will we resolve disagreements over the State-submitted data used to determine the amount of a Tribal Family Assistance Grant? ( a ) If a Tribe disagrees with the data submitted by a State, the Tribe may submit additional relevant information to the Secretary. Relevant information may include, but is not limited to, Census Bureau data, data from the Bureau of Indian Affairs, data from other Federal programs, and Tribal records. ( 1 ) The Tribe must submit any relevant information within 45 days from the date it notifies the Secretary of its disagreement with State submitted data under § 286.20(b).
( 2 ) We will review the additional relevant information submitted by the Tribe, together with the State-submitted data, in order to make a determination as to the amount of the TFAG. We will determine the amount of the TFAG at the earliest possible date after consideration of all relevant data.
§ 308.3 Optional program areas of review. ( a ) *Program direction.* A State may include a program direction review in its self-assessment for the purpose of analyzing the relationships between case results relating to program compliance areas, and performance and program outcome indicators. This review is an opportunity for States to demonstrate how they are trying to manage their resources to achieve the best performance possible. A program direction analysis could describe the following: ( 1 ) Initiatives that resulted in improved and achievable performance accompanied with supporting data;
( 2 ) Barriers impeding progress; and
( 3 ) Efforts to improve performance.
( b ) *Program service enhancement.* A State may include a program service enhancement report in its self-assessment that describes initiatives put into practice that improved program performance and customer service. This is an opportunity for States to promote their programs and innovative practices. Some examples of innovative activities that States may elect to discuss in the report include: ( 1 ) Steps taken to make the program more efficient and effective;
( 2 ) Efforts to improve client services;
( 3 ) Demonstration projects testing creative new ways of doing business;
( 4 ) Collaborative efforts being taken with partners and customers;
( 5 ) Innovative practices which have resulted in improved program performance;
( 6 ) Actions taken to improve public image;
( 7 ) Access/visitation projects initiated to improve non-custodial parents' involvement with the children and;
( 8 ) Efforts to engage non-custodial parents who owe overdue child support to pay that support or engage in work activities, such as subsidized employment, work experience, or job search.
( c ) A State may provide any of the optional information in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section in narrative form.
§ 2507.11 Responses to requests. ( a ) *In general.* To the extent practicable, AmeriCorps will communicate with requesters using electronic means, such as email. Upon request, AmeriCorps will provide an estimated date by which it expects to provide a response to the requester. If a request involves a voluminous amount of material, or searches in multiple locations, the agency may provide interim responses, releasing records on a rolling basis.
( b ) *Acknowledgment of requests.* AmeriCorps will acknowledge the request and inform the requester of the tracking number assigned to the request.
( c ) *Determinations on requests.* In all determinations on requests, AmeriCorps will notify the requester in writing of the right to seek assistance from AmeriCorps' FOIA Public Liaison. ( 1 ) *Grants of requests for records.* When AmeriCorps grants a request in for records in full, it will notify the requester in writing and provide the records. If fees apply, AmeriCorps will inform the requester of those fees and send them the requested records promptly upon their payment of those fees.
( 2 ) *Grants for other matters.* When AmeriCorps grants a request for a fee waiver, modification of a request, or expedited processing, it will notify the requester promptly, in writing.
( 3 ) *Adverse determinations on requests.* If AmeriCorps denies a request in any respect, it will notify the requester in writing of the determination and their right to seek dispute resolution services from AmeriCorps' FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government Information Services. ( i ) Adverse determinations, or denials of requests for records, include decisions that a record, or portion of it, is exempt; that the request does not reasonably describe the records sought; that the record is not subject to the FOIA, is not an agency record, does not exist, cannot be located, or has been destroyed; or that the record is not readily reproducible in the format sought by the requester.
( ii ) Adverse determinations also include denials involving fees or fee waiver matters or denials of requests for expedited proceeding.
( 4 ) *Information provided in the case of a denial.* Response letters that deny all or part of a request will be signed by the person making the decision and will provide: ( i ) In the case of records withheld in whole or in part, a general description of what has been withheld and, where not evident, an estimate of the volume of material withheld, unless providing the description or estimate would harm an interest protected by an exemption;
( ii ) The reasons for the denial, including, as applicable, a reference to the specific FOIA exemption that authorizes the withholding;
( iii ) An explanation of the requester's appeal rights as described in Subpart F and the name and contact information of the Agency's FOIA Appeals Officer.
§ 283.7 How will we use these data on abortions to determine bonus eligibility? ( a ) For those States that have met all the requirements under §§ 283.1 through 283.6, we will calculate the rate of abortions for calendar year 1995 and for the most recent year for which abortion data are available as defined in § 283.2. These rates will equal the number of abortions reported by the State to ACF for the applicable year, divided by total live births among women living in the State reported by NCHS for the same year. We will calculate the rates to three decimal places.
( b ) If ACF determines that the State's rate of abortions for the most recent year for which abortion data are available is less than the rate for 1995, and, if the State has met all the requirements listed elsewhere under this part, the State will receive the bonus.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASIllN(iI0N.I>C.2l>Md 

MEMORANDUM May 17,2018 

TO: Patricia C. OiiDck 

Chief Conq>liaiice Officer 

Thomas E. Hintennister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit DiviaoQ 

FROM: EnnCUopakd^ 

Acting Associate Qenenil Counsel 

Policy Division 

Lorenzo Hoiloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

DanhaAlberico 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on Miaisha Blackburn fiir Congress, Inc. (LRA1067) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Interim Audit Rqxnt ClAR**) on 

Marriia Blackburn fisr Congress, Inc. The lAR contains three findings: (1) Misstatement of 

Financial Activity; (2) Disclosure of Occigtotion andName of Employer; and (3) Receipt of 

Contributions in Excw of the Limit.' We concur with the findings. If you haw any questions, 

please contact Danita Aiberico, the attomqy assigned to this audit. 

' We recomniendthit the CommiukHiooiiuder this document h Executive Satkmbecnise the 

Commiwion mey eventually decide to pursue an iaveaigation of matters contained m the proposed lAR. 

11 C.F.R. §§ 2.4(a) aid (bX^
#### § 17.1 Definition.

Adverse information released by an agency means any statement or release by the Department or any principal operating component made to the news media inviting public attention to an action or a finding by the Department or principal operating component of the Department which may adversely affect persons or organizations identified therein. This part does not apply to nor is it affected by any disclosure of records to the public in response to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act (Pub. L. 90-23). The criteria for such disclosures are set forth in the Department's Public Information Regulation (45 CFR part 5).
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Jack Abramov certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report: 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 20, 2006 /s/   Jack Abramov Jack Abramov Chief Executive Officer
§ 152.32 Use of funds. ( a ) *Limitation on use of funding.* All funds awarded through the contracts established under this program must be used exclusively to pay allowable claims and administrative costs incurred in the development and operation of the PCIP that are in excess of the amounts of premiums collected from individuals enrolled in the program.
( b ) *Limitation on administrative expenses.* No more than 10 percent of available funds shall be used for administrative expenses over the life of the contract with the PCIP, absent approval from HHS.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ACCURUS AEROSPACE §

CORPORATION and ACCURUS §

AEROSPACE WICHITA, LLC, §

§

Defendants and Counterclaim § No. 20, 2020

Plaintiffs-Below, Appellants/ §

Cross-Appellees, §

§

v. § Court Below: Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

BRADLEY E. JULIUS, §

§

Plaintiff and Counterclaim § C.A. No. 2017-0632

Defendant-Below, Appellee/ §

Cross-Appellant, §

§

and §

§

ZTM, INC., THE KELLEY JULIUS §

REVOCABLE TRUST, and THE §

BRADLEY JULIUS REVOCABLE §

TRUST, §

§

Counterclaim Defendants-Below, §

Appellees/Cross-Appellants. §

Submitted: November 4, 2020

Decided: November 9, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

This 9th day of November, 2020, having considered this matter on the briefs and 

the oral arguments of the parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same 

should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery 

in its Memorandum Opinion dated October 31, 2019, and the Stipulation and Final Order 

and Judgment and Stay Pending Appeal, dated December 18, 2019;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Court of Chancery 

be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### Jay D. Page and Company, Respondent, *v.*Frederick W. Stock, Sr., et al., Appellants.

*Page & Go.*v. *Stock,*133 App. Div. 899, affirmed.

(Argued October 14, 1909;

decided October 29, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered *546December 3, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*William L, Barn-um*and *Edwin M. Wells*for appellants.

*Thomas Woods*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
#### § 1169.11 Penalties for obtaining an NEH record under false pretenses.

Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3), any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record from NEH concerning an individual under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 75967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[Document Identifier: CMS-367]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Partial Retraction

ACTION: Notice, partial retraction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Friday, November 24, 2006 (71 FR 67873), the Centers of 
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a Notice document titled 
``Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request''. That notice invited public comments on three 
separate information collections. Through the publication of this 
document, CMS is retracting the portion of that notice requesting 
public comment on the Information Collection Requirement titled 
``Medicaid Drug Program Monthly Quarterly Drug Reporting Format'', form 
number CMS-367 (OMB <greek-i> 0938-0578).

    Dated: December 12, 2006.
Michelle Shortt,
Director, Regulations Development Group, Office of Strategic Operations 
and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 06-9786 Filed 12-15-06; 1:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 11th meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., app.) The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT).

# DATES:

January 23, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Visit                         *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will include presentations by the Consumer Empowerment, Biosurveillance, Confidentiality, Privacy and Security, and Quality Workgroups on their Recommendations and also a demonstration of prototypes of the Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN).

                    A Web site of the Community meeting will be available on the NIH Web site at:                     *http://ww.videocast.nih.gov/​*.                

If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 690-7151.

Dated: December 19, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-9931 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1591 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1591

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that the United 
 States may not recover or collect any charges from a third party for 
hospital care or medical services provided by the Secretary of Veterans 
        Affairs to a veteran for a service-connected disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

   Mr. Adler of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Young of 
 Alaska, Mr. Klein of Florida, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Nye, Mr. Mitchell, and 
 Mr. Michaud) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that the United 
 States may not recover or collect any charges from a third party for 
hospital care or medical services provided by the Secretary of Veterans 
        Affairs to a veteran for a service-connected disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fulfilling America's Promise to Our 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION THAT THE UNITED STATES MAY NOT RECOVER CHARGES 
              FROM A THIRD PARTY FOR TREATMENT OF VETERANS' SERVICE-
              CONNECTED DISABILITIES.

    Section 1729 of title 38, United States Code, is amended----
            (1) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (k); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 
        subsection (i):
    ``(i) In any case in which a veteran is furnished care or services 
under this chapter for a service-connected disability, the United 
States has no right to recover or collect any charges for such care or 
services from any third party.''.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-02-0089-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	APRIL 1, 2002

	______________________________

	RODRIGO RODRIGUEZ,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 106TH DISTRICT COURT OF LYNN COUNTY;

	NO. 94,2210-E; HON. GENE L. DULANEY, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Appellant, Rodrigo Rodriguez, appeals from a judgment revoking his community supervision, adjudicating his guilt, and sentencing him to prison for ten years.  Sentence was pronounced in open court on November 12, 2001.  Thus, the appellate record was due by March 19, 2002.  Tex. R. App. P. 35.2(a).  Neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record has been received.  Furthermore, according to the reporter, the record has not been developed because: 1) he has not received a request from the appellant to develop the  record; 2) he has not received payment; 3) appellant has not made arrangements to pay for same; and, 4) he did not receive a copy of the notice of appeal.

	Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 106th District Court of Lynn County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following: 

	1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

	2.  whether appellant is indigent;  

	3.  whether counsel has been appointed to prosecute this appeal;

	4.  if counsel has not been appointed, whether appellant is entitled to appointed         counsel; and

	5.  whether the appellant is entitled to the preparation of a free appellate record. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  Furthermore, the trial court shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the aforementioned issues and disclosing the name, address, state bar number, and telephone and fax numbers of newly appointed counsel, if any. The district court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders of the district court issued as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Additionally, the district court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before May 1, 2002.  Should 

further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before May 1, 2002. 

      It is so ordered. 

                                                            				Per Curiam 

 Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Yanglin Soybean, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Shulin LiuName:
Shulin LiuTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerApril 12, 2011/s/ Molan ShangguanName:
Molan ShangguanTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerApril 12, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.