Use these links to rapidly review the documentTABLE OF CONTENTS PART IV ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010.Oro

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the Transition Period
from                                    to    
                                .


Commission File Number 001-33076

WILLDAN GROUP, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

14-1951112(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)


2401 East Katella Avenue, Suite 300, Anaheim, California 92806(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(800) 424-9144(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value(Title of class)

NASDAQ Global Market(Name of exchange)


Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ý


The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
last sold, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $16.2 million.

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o    No ý

On March 25, 2011, 7,256,755 shares of the registrant's common stock were issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III
of this Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting to be filed on or
prior to 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.



---





Table of Contents



TABLE OF CONTENTS



PagePART IITEM 1.

BUSINESS


1ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS


18ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


25ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES


25ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


26ITEM 4.

[RESERVED]


27PART IIITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


28ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


30ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


32ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


43ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


44ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


45ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


45ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION


45PART IIIITEM 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT


46ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


46ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS


46ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS


46ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


46PART IVITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


47


ii

---





Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Overview

We are a provider of professional technical and consulting services to small and mid-sized public agencies, large public
utilities and, to a lesser extent, private industry primarily in California, New York, and Arizona. We enable the public agencies to provide a wide range of specialized services, without having to
incur and maintain the overhead necessary to develop staffing in-house, by providing a broad range of services, including:



We
operate our business through a network of offices located primarily in California and New York. We also have operations in Arizona and, to a lesser extent, other states throughout the
United States. As of December 31, 2010, we had a staff of 540 which includes licensed engineers and other professionals. Based on our 2009 revenue, we ranked 177 out of 500 top design firms in
Engineering News-Record's 2010 Design Survey. Our traditional clients have been public agencies in communities with populations ranging from 10,000 to 300,000 people. We believe
communities of this size are underserved by large outsourcing companies that tend to focus on securing large federal and state projects, as well as projects for the private sector. We also provide
services to large public utilities which service major metropolitan communities. We seek to establish close working relationships with our public agency clients and, over time, to expand the breadth
and depth of the services we provide to them.

While
we currently serve communities throughout the country, our business with public agencies is concentrated in California and neighboring states. We provide services to approximately
58% of the 481 incorporated cities and over 60% of the 58 counties in California. We also serve special districts, school districts, a range of public agencies, and to a lesser extent, private
industry. Our business with large public utilities is concentrated in California and New York.

In
fiscal years 2008 and fiscal 2009, general economic conditions declined due to a number of factors including slower economic activity, a lack of available credit, decreased consumer
confidence and reduced corporate profits and capital spending, leading to a slowdown in construction, particularly residential housing construction, in the western United States. As a result of this
slowdown, both our engineering services segment and public finance services segment suffered declines in revenue and operating margin compression. While economic conditions began to improve in fiscal
2010, the recovery has been slow, particularly with regard to our traditional engineering services and public finance services. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation."

We
were founded over 45 years ago and Willdan Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed in 2006 to serve as our holding company. Today, we consist of a family of
wholly owned companies that operate within the following segments for financial reporting purposes:

Engineering Services.Our Engineering Services segment includes the operations of our subsidiaries, Willdan Engineering, Willdan Energy
Solutions and
Public Agency Resources (PARs). These businesses collectively provide civil engineering and planning services and energy efficiency and sustainability consulting services. Additionally, PARs primarily
provides staffing to Willdan Engineering.

1

---



Table of Contents

For
fiscal years 2010 and 2009, revenue for the Engineering Services segment represented approximately 80% and 75%, respectively, of our overall contract revenue.

Public Finance Services.Our Public Finance Services segment consists of the operations of our subsidiary, Willdan Financial Services
(WFS), which
offers economic and financial consulting services to public agencies. For fiscal years 2010 and 2009, contract revenue for the Public Finance Services segment represented approximately 13% and 19%,
respectively, of our overall contract revenue.

Homeland Security Services.Our Homeland Security Services segment consists of the operations of our
subsidiary, Willdan Homeland Solutions, which offers homeland security and communications and technology consulting services. For fiscal years 2010 and 2009, contract revenue for our Homeland Security
Services segment represented approximately 7% and 6%, respectively, of our overall contract revenue.

Our Markets

We provide engineering, public finance and homeland security services primarily to government agencies and public utilities. We believe
the market for these privatized governmental services is, and will be, driven by a number of factors, including:



Engineering services encompass a variety of disciplines associated with the design and construction of public infrastructure
improvements. We expect continued population growth in California and other western states to place a significant strain on the infrastructure in those areas, driving the need for both new
infrastructure and the rehabilitation of aging structures. Federal, state and local governments have responded to this need by proposing an increase in their funding of infrastructure related
activities, and voters in California and Arizona have, in recent years, passed sales tax increases to fund transportation improvements.

Private
industry and public agencies, in response to an increased awareness of global warming and climate change issues among their constituents, are increasingly seeking out
cost-effective, turn-key solutions that provide innovative resource management, energy efficiency, resource conservation and sustainability services. State and local
governments are frequently turning to specialized resource conservation firms to strike the balance between environmental responsibility and economic competitiveness. Consultants have the expertise to
develop efficient and cost effective solutions. The use of energy efficiency services, including audits, program design, benchmark analysis, metering and partnerships with local governments and
utilities, provides city, local and state governments with the ability to realize long-term savings.

2

---



Table of Contents



Public agencies face an increasing burden to raise the necessary funding to build, improve and maintain infrastructure and to provide
services to their local communities. While tax revenues are a primary source of funding, in California there are property tax and spending limits that curtail the generation of these funds.
Alternatives include the issuance of tax-exempt securities; the formation of special financing districts to assess property owners on a parcel basis for infrastructure and public
improvements, such as assessment districts and
community facilities districts (known as Mello-Roos districts in California); the implementation of development impact fee programs that require developers to bear the cost of the impact
of development on local infrastructure; user fee programs that pass costs along to the actual users of services; optimization of utility rates; and special taxes enacted by voters for specific
purposes.

Public
agencies frequently contract with private consultants to provide the advance studies, manage the processes and provide the administration necessary to support these methods.
Consultants have the expertise necessary to form the special financing districts and produce an impact fee study used to develop a schedule of developer fees. Privatized services are also utilized to
implement the programs or revised rate schedules, and in the case of special financing districts, administer the districts through the life of the bonds. Consultants also frequently provide the
services necessary to comply with federal requirements for tax-exempt debt, such as arbitrage rebate calculations and continuing disclosure reports. Use of such services allows public
agencies to capitalize on innovative public finance techniques without incurring the cost of developing in-house expertise.



After September 11, 2001, the need to protect civil infrastructure and implement additional security measures became a priority
at all levels of government. In addition to the threat of terrorism, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita highlighted the vulnerability of our country's infrastructure to natural disasters, while the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill along the Louisiana Gulf Coast emphasized the need for disaster preparedness. These events placed an increased burden on local and regional public agencies to be prepared to respond.
In addition to fire and safety personnel, agencies responsible for the physical safety of infrastructure elements, such as water and wastewater systems, ports and airports, roads and highways, bridges
and dams, are under increased pressure to prepare for natural and man-made disasters. Accordingly, the federal government now considers public works staff members to be "first responders"
to such incidents and we believe that agencies are allocating resources accordingly.

For
fiscal year 2010, under the Department of Homeland Security Grant Program, (HSGP), the federal government provided approximately $1.8 billion to the states, which in turn
disbursed these funds to local law enforcement and other agencies. The federal Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), designated 64 metropolitan areas throughout the country to receive almost half
of the HSGP funds through a program called the DHS Urban Areas Security Initiative, or UASI. Designated UASI metropolitan areas include eight metropolitan areas in California and the Phoenix, Arizona;
Tucson, Arizona; Denver, Colorado; and Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan areas. Homeland security funding has remained constant over the last four years and we do not anticipate a significant decrease
from current funding levels at the federal or state levels in the foreseeable future.

Our Services

We specialize in providing privatized services to public agencies. Our core client base is composed of cities, counties, special
districts, other local and state agencies, tribal governments, large utilities and to a lesser extent, private industry.

3

---



Table of Contents

We
are organized to profitably manage numerous small to mid-size contracts at the same time. With our focus on local and regional agencies, typical contracts can range from
$1,000 to over $1,000,000 in contract revenue. Our typical project contracts have a duration of less than 12 months, although we have city services contracts that have been in effect for over
28 years. At December 31, 2010, we had approximately 2,100 open projects.

We
offer services in three segments: Engineering Services, Public Finance Services, and Homeland Security Services. The interfaces and synergies among these segments are key elements of
our strategy. Management established these segments based upon the services provided, the different marketing strategies associated with these services and the specialized needs of their respective
clients. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the approximate percentage of our consolidated contract revenue attributable to each segment:

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Engineering Services


80
%

75
%

78
%Public Finance Services


13
%

19
%

19
%Homeland Security Services


7
%

6
%

3
%


See
Item 8 of Part II, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for additional segment information.

Engineering Services

We provide a broad range of engineering services to the public sector and limited services to the private sector. In general, contracts
for engineering services (as opposed to construction contracts) are awarded by public agencies based primarily upon the qualifications of the engineering professional, rather than the proposed fees.
Many jobs are awarded without a mandated proposal process, especially if an agency has a longstanding relationship with an engineering professional with relevant expertise. A substantial percentage of
our engineering-related work is for existing clients that we have served for many years.

Our
broad range of engineering services are listed in the following table and described individually below:

City Engineering

Geotechnical EngineeringBuilding and Safety

Flood ControlPublic Works and Infrastructure Design

Code EnforcementConstruction Management

Energy EfficiencyTraffic Engineering

SustainabilityWater and Wastewater Engineering

Water ConservationStructural Engineering

EnvironmentalPlanning

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Reduction StrategiesLandscape Architecture

Climate Action Plans


City Engineering.We specialize in providing engineering services tailored to the unique needs of municipalities. City Engineering can
range from
staffing an entire engineering department to carrying out specific projects within a municipality, such as developing a pavement management program or reviewing engineering plans on behalf of a city.
This is the core of our original business and was the first service offered when we were founded.

Building and Safety.Our building and safety services can range from managing and staffing an entire municipal building department to
providing
specific outsourced services, such as plan review and

4

---



Table of Contents

field
inspections. Other aspects of this discipline include performing accessibility compliance and providing disaster recovery teams, energy compliance evaluations, permit processing and issuance,
seismic retrofitting programs, and structural plan review. Many of our building and safety services engagements are with municipalities and counties where we supplement the capacity of
in-house staff.

Public Works and Infrastructure Design.This sector constitutes our traditional engineering design function. Our engineers design
streets and
highways, airport and transit facilities, freeway interchanges, high-occupancy vehicle lanes, pavement reconstruction, and other elements of city, county, and state infrastructure.

Construction Management.We provide construction management services to our public-sector clients. We provide inspection services,
along with full
construction management and support, depending on the client's needs and the scope of the specific project. Our construction management experience encompasses projects such as streets, bridges, sewers
and storm drains, water systems, parks, pools, public buildings, and utilities.

Traffic Engineering.Our traffic engineering services include serving as the contract city traffic engineer in communities, as well as
performing
design and traffic planning projects for our clients. These services and projects include parking management studies, intersection analyses and improvements, traffic impact reports, and traffic signal
and control systems.

Water and Wastewater Engineering.Our water and wastewater engineering services include design and project management of public water
and wastewater
facilities. Our core competencies include hydraulic modeling, master planning, rate studies and design and construction services. Our design experience includes reservoirs, pressure reducing stations,
pump and lift stations, and pipeline alignment studies, as well as water/wastewater collection, distribution, and treatment facilities.

Structural Engineering.Our structural engineering services include bridge design, bridge evaluation and inspection, highway and
railroad bridge
planning and design, highway interchange design, railroad grade separation design, bridge seismic retrofitting, building design and retrofit, sound wall and retaining wall design, and planning and
design for bridge rehabilitation and replacement.

Planning.As part of our planning services, we assist communities with implementation of general plans, land use enforcement, capital
improvement
planning, community development and redevelopment programs, and economic development strategies. For some cities, we provide staff to relieve peak workload situations or to fill vacant planning
positions on an interim basis. We also prepare land use
studies, environmental documentation services (NEPA/CEQA/EIR), and economic and community development plans, and can handle the development services function for emerging and newly incorporated
cities.

Landscape Architecture.Our services in the area of landscape architecture include design, planning, landscape management, and urban
forestry.
Specific projects include park design and master planning, bidding and construction documents, water conservation plans, urban beautification programs, landscape maintenance management, site planning,
and assessment district management.

Geotechnical Engineering.We provide geotechnical and earthquake engineering services, including soils engineering, earthquake and
seismic hazard
studies, geology and hydrogeology engineering, and construction inspection. We operate a licensed, full-service geotechnical laboratory at our headquarters in Anaheim, California, which
offers an array of testing services, including construction materials testing and inspection.

Flood Control.We provide a complete analysis and projection of storm flows for use in master drainage plans and for individual storm
drain systems
to reduce flooding in streets and adjacent properties.

5

---



Table of Contents

Code EnforcementWe assist municipalities with the development and implementation of neighborhood preservation programs and the
staffing of code
enforcement personnel.

Energy EfficiencyWe provide complete energy efficiency services, including comprehensive surveys and audits, marketing services,
implementation
services, program design, benchmark analysis, metering, and partnering with local governments and utilities. We also create and implement innovative information technology solutions for the energy
industry.

Sustainability.We assist clients (including utilities, schools and private companies) in developing and managing facilities and
infrastructures
through a holistic, practical approach to sustainability. Our services in the area of sustainability cover renewable energy, master plans, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
certification for buildings, GHG reduction strategies, and the development of California Assembly Bill No. 811 (AB-811) projects.

Water Conservation.We offer a full range of water and wastewater management services. Our services in the area of water conservation
cover water
efficiency hardware retrofits, comprehensive audits, and custom developed processes to ensure that the audits result in actual measurable installations of conservation measures. We work with local
governments and water agencies, to provide solutions, from initial analysis and design to implementation.

Environmental.We provide environmental consulting and remediation services to cities, counties, and local governments. Our
environmental services
encompass many technical disciplines and programs, including human health and ecological risk assessment, toxicology, chemistry, geochemistry, hydrogeology, hazardous materials and waste management,
surface and storm water management, remediation system selection and design, remediation construction management, and environmental compliance.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Strategies.We assist cities, counties, utilities, municipalities, and other clients with development of
strategies to
reduce GHG emissions. This includes benchmarking GHG emissions, developing and implementing strategies, and exploring financing options.

Climate Action Plans.We assist clients with development and implementation of climate action plans. These plans are inclusive of
energy efficiency,
water conservation, land development, renewable, and GHG reduction strategies.

Representative Projects.Examples of typical projects we have in the Engineering Services segment include:



6

---



Table of Contents



7

---





Table of Contents



8

---



Table of Contents



Public Finance Services

We acquired our subsidiary Willdan Financial Services (formerly known as MuniFinancial), a public finance consulting business, in 1999
to supplement the services we offer our public-sector clients. In general, we supply expertise and support for the various financing techniques employed by public agencies to finance their operations
and infrastructure. We also support the
mandated reporting and other requirements associated with these financings. We do not provide underwriting or financial advisory services for municipal securities.

Unlike
our Engineering Services business, we often compete for business, at least initially, through a competitive bid process. However, since many public sector financing instruments,
such as tax-exempt bonds, remain outstanding for up to 30 years, clients tend to retain us for as long as the financing remains in place. Our services in this segment include the
following:

District Administration.We administer special districts on behalf of public agencies. The types of special districts administered
include community
facilities districts (in California, Mello-Roos districts), assessment districts, landscape and lighting districts, school facilities improvement districts, water districts, benefit
assessment districts, fire suppression districts, and business improvement districts. Our administration services include calculating the annual levy for each parcel in the district; billing charges
directly or through a county tax roll; preparing the annual Engineer's Report, budget and resolutions; reporting on collections and payment status; calculating prepayment quotes; and providing
financial analyses, modeling and budget forecasting.

The
key to our District Administration services is our proprietary software package, MuniMagic®: Municipal Administration & Government Information Coordinator, which
we developed internally to redefine the way we administer special districts. MuniMagic® is a database management program that maintains parcel data; calculates special taxes, assessments,
fees and charges; manages payment tracking; maintains bond-related information in a single, central location; and provides reporting, financial modeling and analysis at multiple levels of
detail. MuniMagic® offers a significant competitive advantage in an industry driven by the ability to accurately process extremely large quantities of data.

9

---



Table of Contents

MuniMagic®
is also available for licensing by our existing clients. See "Intellectual Property" for a discussion of the licensing terms.

Financial Consulting Services.We perform economic analyses and financial projects for public agencies, including:



Federal Compliance Services.We offer federal compliance services to issuers of municipal securities, which can be cities, towns,
school districts,
housing authorities and other entities that are eligible to issue tax-exempt securities. Specifically, we provide arbitrage rebate calculations and municipal disclosure services that help
issuers remain in compliance with federal regulations. We provide these reports, together with related compliance services such as bond elections, temporary period yield restriction, escrow fund
monitoring, rebate payments and refund requests. In terms of continuing disclosure services, we both produce the required annual reports and disseminate those reports on behalf of the issuers. We
provide federal compliance services to approximately 610 issuers in 38 states and the District of Columbia on more than 2,500 bond issues totaling over $60 billion in municipal debt.

Representative Projects.Examples of typical projects we have in the Public Finance Services segment include:



10

---



Table of Contents



11

---



Table of Contents



Homeland Security Services

In fiscal 2004, we formed our subsidiary Willdan Homeland Solutions (WHS), formerly known as American Homeland Solutions. WHS provides
homeland security and public safety consulting services to cities, counties and related municipal service agencies, such as utility and water companies, as well as school districts, port and
transportation authorities, tribal governments and large business enterprises with a need for homeland security related services. We staff our projects in this area with former high-level
local and regional public safety officers and focus on solutions tailored for local agencies and their personnel. Our services include the following:

Training Services.We design customized training courses for all aspects of disaster, unusual occurrence and emergency responses. In
this regard, we
have developed and own several training courses that meet or exceed the requirements for the federal National Incident Management System (NIMS) training. These courses assist clients in meeting their
obligations to prepare their staff to utilize the NIMS. Our courses have been approved by California's Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training, the California Emergency Management Agency,
and the Federal National Integration Center, Training and Education Division, formerly the Department of Homeland Security's "Office of Grants and Training."

Emergency Operations Planning.We design, develop, implement, review, and evaluate public and private agencies' emergency operations
and hazard
mitigation plans, including compliance and consistency with federal, state and local laws and policies. Plans are tailored to respond to terrorism, intentional acts of
sabotage, and natural disasters. We also provide command and control and emergency response training for all types of unusual occurrences. We have developed emergency operations and continuity and
hazard mitigation plans for municipal governments, special districts, school districts, and private-industry clients.

Terrorism and Threat Vulnerability Assessments.These assessments involve the development of policies and procedures to assess threats
and the
vulnerability of local, regional, state, and national infrastructures, including city and county buildings, ports and airports, facilities, power supplies, water supplies, communications networks, and
transportation systems.

Planning Evaluations and Exercises.We conduct planning sessions and exercises, including those relating to weapons of mass destruction,
 large
events, mass casualty transportation disasters, terrorism incident response, natural disaster response and recovery, and civil disorder events. We design these exercises for multi-agency involvement
so they are fully compliant with the federal government's Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP), the State Emergency Management System (SEMS) for California, and the National
Response Framework. Exercises are designed to evaluate and test "first responders" and support personnel, as well as elected officials and agency management.

Public Safety and Management Consulting.We provide independent analyses, evaluations and recommendations for enhancing the performance
of public
safety agencies, such as police and fire departments. Management consulting service areas include organizational assessments and studies, staffing and outsourcing support for new and existing cities,
management training and development,

12

---



Table of Contents

administrative
investigations, and background investigations. These services are provided to local, state, and tribal governments and agencies; private companies; trade associations;
non-profit organizations; and educational institutions from K-12 through colleges and universities.

Communications and Technology.We provide homeland security, public safety, and emergency response capabilities for government and
corporate clients
that focus on integrating local resources and assets within federal, state, and local systems. Core competencies within Communications and Technology include requirements development, integration,
life cycle analysis, system design, procurement and selection, deployment, interoperability, project management, quality management, assessments, conceptual and final design and gap analysis in the
public safety radio land mobile communications and
corporate market including broadband networks, commercial cellular test plans, data networks, microwave network planning and related engineering design.

Representative Projects.Examples of typical Homeland Security Services projects include:



13

---





Table of Contents

Competitive Strengths

Founded over 45 years ago, we have a well-established track record of providing a wide range of privatized services
to the public sector. We have developed the experience base, professional staff and support technology and software necessary to quickly and effectively respond to the needs of our clients. We believe
we have developed a reputation within our industry as problem solvers across a broad range of client issues. Some of our competitive strengths include:

Quality of service.We pride ourselves on the quality of service that we provide to our clients. The work for which we compete is
awarded primarily
based on the company's qualifications, rather than the fees proposed. We believe that our service levels, experience and expertise satisfy even the most rigorous qualification standards. We have
developed a strong reputation for quality, based upon our depth of experience, ability to attract quality professionals, customized technology and software that support our services, local knowledge
and the expertise we possess across multiple disciplines. We believe we are well-positioned to serve public sector clients due to our knowledge of the unique reporting processes and
operating procedures of public agencies, which differ substantially from the
private sector. We believe our high quality of service is a significant reason we currently provide services to approximately 58% of the cities and over 60% of the counties in California.

Broad range of services.Our focus on customer service has led us to continually broaden the scope of the services we provide. At
different stages in
our history, as the needs of our public sector clients have evolved, we have developed service capabilities complementary to our core engineering business, including building and safety services,
financial and economic services, planning services, geotechnical services, code enforcement services, disaster planning and homeland security services, and more recently, energy efficiency and
sustainability. Further, because we recognize that local public sector projects and issues often cross departmental lines, we have developed the ability to deliver multiple services in a cohesive
manner to better serve our client communities as a whole.

Strategic locations in key markets.Local agencies want professionals who understand their local needs. Therefore, we deliver our
services through a
network of offices dispersed throughout the western United States and New York. Each of our offices is staffed with quality professionals, including former management level public sector employees,
such as planners, engineers, inspectors, and police and fire department personnel. These professionals understand the local and regional markets in which they work.

Strong, long-term client relationships.We have developed strong relationships with our public agency clients, some of whom we have
worked with for over 27 years. The value of these long-term relationships is reflected in the recurring award of new projects, ongoing staffing assignments, and
long-term projects that require high-level supervision. We also seek to maintain close personal relationships with public agency decision-makers to strengthen our relationships
with them and the agencies with which they work. We frequently develop new client relationships as our public agency contacts are promoted or move to other agencies. Our strong culture of community
involvement and leadership in key public agency organizations underscores our customer focus and helps us cultivate and expand our client base.

Experienced, talented and motivated employees.Our staff consists of seasoned professionals with a broad array of specialties, and a
strong customer
service orientation. Our corporate culture places a high priority on investing in our people, including providing opportunities for stock ownership to attract, motivate and retain top professionals.
Our executive officers have an average of more than 32 years of experience in the engineering and consulting industry, and an average of 4 years with our company.

14

---



Table of Contents

Clients

Our clients primarily consist of cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, water districts, school districts and universities, state
agencies, federal agencies, a variety of other special districts and agencies, tribal governments, public utilities and to a lesser extent, private industry. Our typical client is an agency serving
communities of 10,000 to 300,000 people. In fiscal 2010, we served over 800 distinct clients. For fiscal 2010, we had one client, the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, that accounted for 21% of
our consolidated contract revenue. None of our other clients accounted for over 6% of our consolidated contract revenue. Our clients are based in California, New York, Arizona and, to a lesser extent,
other states throughout the United States. In fiscal 2010, services provided to public agencies and, to a lesser extent, private industry in California accounted for approximately 68% of our contract
revenue.

Contract Structure

We provide our services under contracts, purchase orders or retainer letters. The contracts we enter into with our clients contain
three principal types of pricing provisions:



We
also receive monthly retainers from a limited number of our clients. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the approximate percentage of our contract revenue
subject to each type of pricing provision:

Fiscal Year2010

2009Time and materials


44
%

41
%Unit based


27
%

20
%Fixed price


28
%

37
%Monthly retainer


1
%

2
%Total


100
%

100
%


The
percentage of our contract revenue derived from fixed price contracts decreased to 28% in fiscal year 2010 from 37% in fiscal year 2009 primarily because Willdan Energy Solutions had
time and materials and unit based provisions in a higher percentage of its new contracts than it had in previous years.

For
time and materials and fixed price contracts, we bill our clients periodically in accordance with the contract terms based on costs incurred, on either an hourly fee basis or on a
percentage of

15

---



Table of Contents

completion
basis, as the project progresses. For unit based and retainer based contracts, we bill our clients upon delivery of the contracted item or service, and in some cases, in advance of
delivery.

Our
contracts come up for renewal periodically and at the time of renewal may be subject to renegotiation, which could impact the profitability on that contract. In addition, during the
term of a contract, public agencies may request additional or revised services which may impact the economics of the transaction. Most of our contracts permit our clients, with prior notice, to
terminate the contracts at any time without cause. While we have a large volume of transactions, the renewal, termination or modification of a contract, in particular our contract with Consolidated
Edison of New York, may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operations.

Competition

The market for our services is highly fragmented. We often compete with many other firms ranging from small local firms to large
national firms. Contract awards are based primarily on qualifications, relevant experience, staffing capabilities, geographic presence, stability and price.

Doing
business with governmental agencies is complex and requires the ability to comply with intricate regulations and satisfy periodic audits. We have been serving cities, counties,
special districts and other public agencies for over 45 years. We believe that the ability to understand these requirements and to successfully conduct business with governmental entities and
agencies is a barrier to entry for potential competitors.

Our
competition varies by type of client, type of service and geography. The range of competitors for any one project can vary depending upon technical specialties, the relative value of
the project, geographic location, financial terms, risks associated with the work, and any client imposed restrictions. Unlike most of our competitors, we focus our services on public sector clients.
Public sector clients generally choose among competing firms by weighing the quality, experience, innovation and timeliness of the firm's services. When selecting consultants for engineering projects,
many government agencies are required to, and others choose to, employ Qualifications Based Selection, or QBS. QBS requires the selection of the most technically qualified firms for a project, while
the financial and legal terms of the engagement are generally secondary. QBS applies primarily to work done by our Engineering Services segment. Contracts in the Public Finance Services and Homeland
Security Services areas typically are not subject to mandatory QBS standards, and often are awarded through a competitive bid process.

Our
competition varies geographically. Although we provide services in several states, we may be stronger in certain service lines in some geographical areas than in other regions.
Similarly, some of our larger competitors are stronger in some service lines in certain localities but are not as competitive in others. Our smaller competitors generally are limited both
geographically as well as in the services they are able to provide.

We
believe that the primary competitors for our Engineering Services segment include Charles Abbott & Associates, Inc., Bureau Veritas, Harris & Associates, Psomas,
RBF Consulting, Tetra Tech, Inc., Stantec, Inc., Michael Baker Corporation, TRC Companies, Inc., AECOM Technology Corporation, CH2M Hill and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Our chief competitors in our Public Finance Services segment include David Taussig & Associates, Harris & Associates and NBS Government Finance Group. We believe the Homeland Security
Services segment competes primarily with EG&G (a division of URS Corporation) and SRA International, Inc.

Insurance

We currently maintain general liability insurance, with coverage in the amount of $1.0 million per occurrence, subject to a
$2.0 million general aggregate limit; and professional liability insurance, with

16

---



Table of Contents

$5.0 million
in coverage per claim, and a $10.0 million annual aggregate limit. Our professional liability policy is a "claims made" policy. We also carry excess coverage of an
additional $10.0 million for general, automobile and employer's liability claims. We are liable to pay these claims from our assets if and when the aggregate settlement or judgment amount
exceeds our policy limits.

Employees

At December 31, 2010, we had approximately 387 full-time employees and 153 part-time employees. All
Public Agency Resources' employees are classified as part-time. Our employees include, among others, licensed civil, traffic and structural engineers, land surveyors, certified building
officials, licensed geotechnical engineers and engineering geologists, certified inspectors and plans examiners, licensed architects and landscape architects, certified planners, and information
technology specialists. We believe that we attract and retain highly skilled personnel with significant industry experience and strong client relationships by offering them challenging assignments in
a stable work environment. We believe that our employee relations are good. We currently have one field survey employee covered by a Master Labor Agreement between the International Union of Operating
Engineers Local Union No. 12 and the Southern California Association of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, which expires in October 2013.

The
following table sets forth the number of our employees in each of our business segments and our holding company:

As of Fiscal Year End2010

2009

2008Engineering Services


383


324


401Public Finance Services


64


65


74Homeland Security Services


29


20


16Holding Company Employees (Willdan Group, Inc.)


64


57


59Total


540


466


550


At
December 31, 2010, we contracted with approximately 162 former and current public safety officers to conduct homeland security services training courses. These instructors are
classified as subconsultants and not employees.

Intellectual Property

The Willdan, Willdan Group, Inc., Willdan Engineering, Willdan Financial Services, Willdan Energy Solutions and Willdan Homeland
Services names are service marks of ours, and we have obtained a service mark for the Willdan logo. We have also obtained federal trademark registration with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office for the "Willdan" name and the "extending your reach" tagline. We believe we have strong name recognition in the western United States and New York, and that this provides us a competitive
advantage in obtaining new business. Consequently, we believe it is important to protect our brand identity through trademark registrations. The name and logo of our proprietary software,
MuniMagic®, are registered trademarks of Willdan Financial Services, and we have registered a federal copyright for the source code for the MuniMagic® software. We license the
MuniMagic® software to existing clients pursuant to licensing agreements that allow varying levels of access to data. This technology allows clients to view their own data and is a form of
deliverable to our clients. The use of licensing provides us protection for this proprietary technology. MuniMagic® is not a commercial product offered for sale.

17

---





Table of Contents

Available Information

Our website is www.willdan.com and our investor relations page is under the caption "Investors" on our website. We make available on
this website under "SEC Filings," free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. We also make available
on this website our prior earnings calls and, under the heading "InvestorsCorporate Governance," our Code of Ethical Conduct. The information on our website is not a part of or
incorporated by reference into this filing. Further, a copy of this annual report on Form 10-K is located at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC
maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

A further downturn in public and private sector construction activity in the regions we serve, or other conditions that impact the construction industry, may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A further downturn in construction activity in our geographic service areas may affect demand for our services, which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition. During fiscal year 2010, a portion of our contract revenue was generated by services rendered to public agencies in
connection with private and public sector construction projects.

In
fiscal 2008 and 2009, general economic conditions declined due to a number of factors including slower economic activity, a lack of available credit, decreased consumer confidence and
reduced corporate profits and capital spending, leading to a slowdown in construction, particularly residential housing construction, in the western United States. As a result of this slowdown, both
our engineering services segment and public finance services segment suffered declines in revenue and operating margin compression and we made several reductions in workforce and facility leases.
While economic conditions began to improve in fiscal 2010 and we began to increase our workforce again, the recovery has been slow with regard to our traditional engineering services and public
finance services. If the economy declines again, we will need to evaluate whether reductions in headcount and facilities in geographic areas that are underperforming are again needed.

Our
business, financial condition and results of operations may also be adversely affected by conditions that impact the construction sector in general, including, among other
things:



18

---



Table of Contents



Any
of these factors could adversely affect the demand for our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in the local and regional economies of California could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse economic and other conditions affecting the local and regional economies of California may reduce the demand for our services,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. During fiscal year 2010, approximately 68% of our contract revenue was derived from services
rendered to public agencies and, to a lesser extent, private industry in California, including contract revenue from public utilities. From 1991 to 1996, California experienced an economic downturn
that had a negative impact on the construction and development sectors. This economic downturn caused us to experience cash flow difficulties and substantial operating losses. California experienced
another economic downturn in fiscal 2009, which negatively impacted our revenue and profitability. Our revenue in fiscal year 2009 decreased by 15.8% from fiscal year 2008 and we sustained a net loss
of $5.6 million for fiscal year 2009 as compared to net loss of $1.6 million for fiscal year 2008. We believe the downturn in the residential housing market had a significant impact on
our results, in particular the loss of revenue from fees associated with building permits and inspection services.

We may not be able to obtain capital when desired on favorable terms, if at all, or without dilution to our stockholders, which may impact our ability to execute on our
current or future business strategies.

We anticipate that our current cash, cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and funds available through our revolving
line of credit will be sufficient to meet our current and anticipated needs for general corporate purposes during the next 12 months. It is possible, however, that we may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations or otherwise have the capital resources to meet our future capital needs. For example, at the end of our third and fourth fiscal quarters in 2008, we did not meet
certain financial covenants under our revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"). As a result of these covenant violations, Wells Fargo was no longer
obligated to extend funds to us under the revolving credit agreement. Wells Fargo waived these breaches and eliminated or modified certain financial covenants in the credit agreement in exchange for a
reduction in the commitment from $10 million to $5 million, increased pricing and additional collateral being provided. As of December 31, 2010, we had $1.0 million in
outstanding borrowings under this facility. The credit agreement, as amended, matures on January 1,
2012. If we fail to comply with any covenant, including the remaining financial covenant, in the credit agreement, any loans outstanding at that time could be accelerated by Wells Fargo and Wells
Fargo would not be obligated to make any new loans under the revolving credit facility. We cannot provide any assurance that Wells Fargo will continue to make loans under the facility if we violate a
covenant in the future or that Wells Fargo will renew the facility when it expires. If this occurs and we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or otherwise, we may need additional
financing to execute on our current or future business strategies, which include the following:



19

---



Table of Contents



If
we raise additional funds through the issuance of convertible debt or equity securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders could be significantly diluted, and these newly
issued securities may have
rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are
not available or are not available on acceptable terms, if and when needed, our ability to fund our operations, take advantage of strategic opportunities, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures
would be significantly limited.

Reductions in state and local government budgets could negatively impact their capital spending and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

Several of our state and local government clients are currently facing budget deficits, resulting in smaller budgets and reduced
capital spending, which has negatively impacted our revenue and profitability. Our state and local government clients may continue to face budget deficits that prohibit them from funding new or
existing projects. In addition, existing and potential clients may either postpone entering into new contracts or request price concessions. If we are not able to reduce our costs quickly enough to
respond to the revenue decline from these clients that may occur, our operating results would be adversely affected. Accordingly, these factors affect our ability to accurately forecast our future
revenue and earnings from business areas that may be adversely impacted by market conditions.

We depend on a client for a significant portion of our business.

Our largest client, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, accounted for approximately 21% of our consolidated contract revenue in
fiscal 2010. This revenue primarily relates to the contract we entered into in fiscal 2009. The loss of, or reduction in orders from this client could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.

Legislation may be enacted that limits the ability of state, regional or local agencies to contract for our privatized services. Such legislation would affect our ability to
obtain new contracts and may decrease the demand for our services.

Legislation is proposed periodically, particularly in the state of California, that attempts to limit the ability of governmental
agencies to contract with private consultants to provide services. Should such legislation pass and be upheld, demand for our services may be materially adversely affected. During fiscal year 2010,
approximately 68% of our contract revenue was derived from services rendered to public agencies, including public utilities, in California. While attempts at such legislation have failed in the past,
as the composition of California's legislative body changes over time there is an increased risk that measures could be adopted in the future that limit the market for privatized services.

State and other public employee unions may bring litigation that seeks to limit the ability of public agencies to contract with private firms to perform government employee
functions in the area of public improvements. Judicial determinations in favor of these unions could affect our ability to compete for contracts and may have an adverse effect on our revenue and
profitability.

Over at least the last 20 years, state and other public employee unions have challenged the validity of propositions,
legislation, charters and other government regulations that allow public agencies to contract with private firms to provide services in the fields of engineering, design and construction of

20

---



Table of Contents

public
improvements that might otherwise be provided by public employees. These challenges could have the affect of eliminating, or severely restricting, the ability of municipalities to hire private
firms for the purpose of designing and constructing public improvements, and otherwise require them to use union employees to perform the services.

For
example, the Professional Engineers in California Government, or PECG, a union representing state civil service employees, began challenging Caltrans' hiring of private firms in
1986, and in 2002 began a judicial challenge of Caltrans' hiring practices based on Caltrans' interpretation of the effect of Proposition 35 (Professional Engineers in California Government, et al. v.
Jeff Morales, et al.). The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of Caltrans, concluding that Caltrans may hire private contractors to perform architectural and engineering services on public works.
Although Caltrans was successful in this litigation, similar claims may be brought in the future and we cannot predict their outcome. If a state or other public employee union is successful in its
challenge and as a result the ability of state agencies to hire private firms is severely limited, such a decision would likely lead to additional litigation challenging the ability of the state,
counties, municipalities and other public agencies to hire private engineering, architectural and other firms, the outcome of which could affect our ability to compete for contracts and may have an
adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.

Changes in elected or appointed officials could have a material adverse effect on our ability to retain an existing contract with or obtain additional contracts from a
public agency.

Since the decision to retain our services is made by individuals, such as city managers, city councils and other elected or appointed
officials, our business and financial results or condition could be adversely affected by the results of local and regional elections. A change in the individuals responsible for selecting consultants
for and awarding contracts on behalf of a public agency due to an election could adversely affect our ability to retain an existing contract with or obtain additional contracts from such public
agency.

Fixed price contracts under which we perform some of our services impose risks to our ability to maintain or grow our profitability.

In fiscal year 2010, approximately 28% of our contract revenue was derived from fixed price contracts. Under fixed price contracts, we
perform services under a contract at a stipulated price which protects clients but exposes us to a greater number of risks than time-and-materials and unit-based
contracts. These risks include:



The
occurrence of any such risk could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

21

---



Table of Contents

Because we primarily provide services to municipalities and other public agencies, we are more susceptible to the unique risks associated with government contracts.

We primarily work for municipalities and other public agencies. Consequently, we are exposed to certain risks associated with
government contracting, any one of which can have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. These risks include:



Changes in the perceived risk of acts of terrorism or natural disasters could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow our Willdan Homeland Solutions business.

If there is a significant decrease in the perceived risk of the likelihood that one or more acts of terrorism will be conducted in the
United States, or a significant decrease in the perceived risk of the occurrence of natural disasters, our ability to grow and generate revenue through Willdan Homeland Solutions, or WHS, could be
negatively affected. WHS provides training and consulting services to local and regional agencies related to preparing for and responding to incidents of terrorism and natural disaster. Should the
perceived risk of such incidence decline, federal and state funding for homeland security and emergency preparedness could be reduced which might decrease demand for our services and have a material
adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The loss of certain of our key executives could adversely affect our business, including our ability to secure and complete engagements and attract and retain employees.

Our success is highly dependent upon the efforts, talents, abilities, marketing skills and operational execution of our key executives
and managers. Between 2006 and 2008 we experienced significant turnover in our management team. Any future losses of our management team or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our
business, including the ability to secure or complete contracts and to attract and retain additional employees.

Our ability to grow and compete in our industry will be hampered if we are unable to retain the continued service of our key professionals or to identify, hire and retain
additional qualified professionals.

A critical factor to our business is our ability to attract and retain qualified professionals. We are continually at risk of losing
current professionals or being unable to hire additional professionals as needed. If we are unable to attract new qualified employees, our ability to grow will be adversely affected. If we are unable
to retain current employees, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. We would also be increasing our competition, as former employees pose the greatest threat of
significant competition to our business.

22

---



Table of Contents

We operate in a highly fragmented industry, and we may not be able to compete effectively with our larger competitors.

The market for services in the engineering, municipal consulting, public finance consulting, geotechnical, homeland security and other
technical services industries is competitive and highly fragmented. Contract awards are based primarily on quality of service, relevant experience, staffing capabilities, reputation, geographic
presence, stability and price. Some of our competitors in certain service areas have more personnel and greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us.

With
regard to engineering related services, which represented approximately 80% and 75% of our contract revenue for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively, our competitors include
many larger consulting firms such as AECOM Technology Corporation, CH2M Hill, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. In certain public finance consulting services, we may
compete with large accounting firms. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future with these or other competitors.

Our services may expose us to liability in excess of our current insurance coverage, which may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

Our services involve significant risks of professional and other liabilities, which may substantially exceed the fees we derive from
our services. In addition, from time to time, we
assume liabilities as a result of indemnification provisions contained in our service contracts. We cannot predict the magnitude of these potential liabilities.

We
currently maintain general liability insurance, with coverage in the amount of $1.0 million per occurrence, subject to a $2.0 million general aggregate limit; and
professional liability insurance, with $5.0 million in coverage per claim, and a $10.0 million annual aggregate limit. We also carry excess coverage of an additional $10.0 million
for general, automobile and employer's liability claims. Claims may be made against us that exceed these limits. We are liable to pay claims from our assets if and when the aggregate settlement or
judgment amount exceeds our policy limits. Our professional liability policy is a "claims made" policy. Thus, only claims made during the term of the policy are covered. If we terminate our
professional liability policy and do not obtain retroactive coverage, we would be uninsured for claims made after termination even if these claims are based on events or acts that occurred during the
term of the policy. Further, our insurance may not protect us against liability because our policies typically have various exceptions to the claims covered and also require us to assume some costs of
the claim even though a portion of the claim may be covered. In addition, if we expand into new markets, we may not be able to obtain insurance coverage for these new activities or, if insurance is
obtained, the dollar amount of any liabilities incurred could exceed our insurance coverage. A partially or completely uninsured claim, if successful and of significant magnitude, could have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity.

The quality of our service and our ability to perform under some of our contracts would be adversely affected if qualified subconsultants are unavailable for us to engage.

Under some of our contracts, we rely on the efforts and skills of subconsultants for the performance of some of the tasks. In fiscal
years 2010 and 2009, subconsultant costs comprised approximately 21% and 13%, respectively, of our contract revenue. The use of subconsultants increased in fiscal 2010 because of increased demand for
the energy efficiency, sustainability and renewable energy services of our subsidiary Willdan Energy Solutions, which generally utilizes a higher percentage of subconsultants than our other
subsidiaries. The absence of qualified subconsultants with whom we have a satisfactory relationship could adversely affect the quality of our service offerings and therefore our financial results.
Additionally, we may have disputes with our subconsultants arising from, among

23

---



Table of Contents

other
things, the quality and timeliness of work performed by the subconsultant or client concerns about the subconsultant.

Potential future acquisitions could be difficult to integrate, divert the attention of key personnel, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and impair our financial
results.

As part of our business strategy, we intend to consider acquisitions of companies that are complementary to our business, such as our
acquisition of Intergy Corporation in June 2008. Appropriate acquisitions could allow us to expand into new geographical locations, offer new services, or acquire additional talent. Accordingly, our
future performance will be impacted by our ability to identify appropriate businesses to acquire, negotiate favorable terms for such acquisitions and then effectively and efficiently integrate such
acquisitions into our existing businesses. There is no certainty that we will succeed in such endeavors.

Acquisitions
involve numerous risks, any of which could harm our business, including:



Acquisitions
also frequently result in the recording of goodwill and other intangible assets which are subject to potential impairment in the future that could harm our financial
results. In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing convertible debt or equity securities, our existing stockholders may be diluted, which could lower the market price of our common stock. As
a result, if we fail to properly evaluate acquisitions or investments, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such acquisitions, and we may incur costs in excess of amounts that we
anticipate.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant costs as a public company.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we would not incur as a private company such as
more costly director and officer liability insurance. If new rules and regulations for public companies are put in place, they may further increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make
some activities more time-consuming and costly.

24

---



Table of Contents

The concentration of ownership of our stock may delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management, and as a result may hinder the ability of
our stockholders to take advantage of a premium offer.

The concentration of ownership of our stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the company or a
change in our management and may adversely affect the voting or other rights of other holders of our common stock. As of March 23, 2011 our directors and executive officers beneficially own
1,169,000 shares of common stock, or approximately 19% of our outstanding common stock. Of these shares, 795,837 shares, or approximately 11% of our outstanding common stock, are owned by Linda L.
Heil, a member of our board of directors. Phronesis Partners, L.P. owns 789,687 shares, or approximately 11% of our outstanding common stock.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

In addition to current and historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our future operations, prospects, potential products, services, developments and business strategies. These statements can, in some
cases, be identified by the use of words like "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "intend," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "project," "potential," or
"continue" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. This report includes, among others, forward-looking statements regarding our:



These
statements involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking
statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, those listed in this section. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any of our forward-looking statements after the
date of this report to reflect actual results or future events or circumstances.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters are located in approximately 38,000 square feet of office space that we lease at 2401 East Katella Avenue,
Anaheim, California. In addition, we lease office space in 22 other locations principally in California, Arizona and New York. In total, our facilities contain approximately 151,000 square feet of
office space and are subject to leases that expire through fiscal year 2015. A small portion of this includes office space that we rent on a month-to-month basis. We believe
that our existing facilities are adequate to meet current requirements and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any expansion of operations and for
additional offices.

25

---



Table of Contents

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to claims and lawsuits from time to time, including those alleging professional errors or omissions that arise in the
ordinary course of business against firms, like ours, that operate in the engineering and consulting professions. We carry professional liability insurance, subject to certain deductibles and policy
limits, for such claims as they arise and may from time to time establish reserves for litigation that is considered probable of a loss. We may incur substantial expenses in defending against third
party claims. In the event of a determination adverse to us, we may incur substantial monetary liability and be required to change our business practices. Either of these results could have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Other
than as described below, we are not currently involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, are any material litigation currently threatened against us, other than
routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, most of which is expected to be covered by liability insurance.

County of San Diego v. Willdan,Superior Court of California, Riverside County

A
complaint was filed against us on February 28, 2008 relating to a project for the reconstruction of a portion of Valley Center Road located in an unincorporated area of San
Diego County. The design was completed by us and a contract was awarded to a construction contractor for construction of the improvements. The construction was originally scheduled for completion in
December 2008; however completion was delayed until fall 2009. The lawsuit alleges that the delays in construction were caused by errors and omissions in our preparation of reports and design and
engineering of the project, resulting in additional design and construction costs, in an amount to be determined but alleged to be
in excess of $5.0 million. We deny the allegations asserted in the lawsuit and will vigorously defend against the claims.

French v. Willdan Engineering, Superior Court of California, Riverside County

In
January 1991, we were originally retained by the city of Calimesa, California to review and process development plans. We have provided plan review continuously since that date under
various contracts with the city. As the city receives applications from developers for project approvals, the city forwards the project plans to us for processing. We process the plans and the city
pays us for our services. In August 2008, a suit was filed by a city employee alleging that the city processed development applications without first collecting fees from developers to cover the costs
of processing. The suit further alleges that even though we performed the work requested by the city, the city should not have paid us for our work in advance of collecting the developers' fees. The
complaint was amended by the plaintiff in May 2010 to provide additional details and we have filed an answer to the complaint. The plaintiff seeks to recover for the city amounts paid to us for
processing project plans for which the developer fees have not been paid. The city of Calimesa has not requested any refunds from us or joined in the litigation, and the city continues to retain our
services. We do not believe that this suit has any merit and will vigorously defend this claim.

26

---



Table of Contents

Vega v. City of Coachella, Superior Court of California, Riverside County

On
February 2, 2011, Willdan Group, Inc., was served with a lawsuit concerning a fatal traffic accident on Dillon Road at Harrison Place in the city of Coachella on
October 7, 2008. At the time of the accident, Dillon Road was in the midst of a street widening project. Willdan Engineering had been under contract with the city of Coachella to provide
construction management services. The accident occurred when an individual driving southbound on Dillon Road ran the stop sign at the intersection of Harrison Place, colliding with a vehicle making a
left turn from northbound Dillon Road onto Harrison Place. The driver of the northbound vehicle was injured in the accident and a passenger seated in the front passenger seat was killed. At the time
of the accident, there were "STOP" signs posted in both directions on Dillon Road, the construction zone was posted with 25 mph speed limit signs and construction zone signs, and there were "STOP
AHEAD" signs posted in both directions on Dillon Road in advance of the intersection. The plaintiff seeks to recover unspecified damages from us. We believe that the accident was caused solely by the
southbound driver, and will vigorously defend this claim.

ITEM 4.    [RESERVED]

27

---





Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Since November 21, 2006, the common stock of Willdan Group, Inc. has been listed and traded on the Nasdaq Global Market
under the symbol "WLDN". The following table sets out the high and low daily closing sale prices as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for fiscal years 2010 and 2009. These reported prices reflect
inter-dealer prices without adjustments for retail markups, markdowns, or commissions.

2010

2009High

Low

High

Low1st Quarter

$
2.52

$
2.11

$
2.99

$
1.462nd Quarter

$
2.98

$
2.18

$
1.99

$
1.153rd Quarter

$
3.40

$
2.54

$
3.75

$
1.344th Quarter

$
4.06

$
3.28

$
3.10

$
2.06


On
March 25, 2011, the closing sales price per share of our common stock, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market, was $4.41.



As of March 25, 2011, there were 105 stockholders of record of our common stock.



We did not declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock in fiscal years 2010 and 2009. Our revolving credit agreement prohibits
the payment of any dividend or distribution on our common stock either in cash, stock or any other property without the lender's consent.



In the three years preceding the filing of this report, we have issued the following securities that were not registered under the
Securities Act:

In
connection with our purchase of Willdan Energy Solutions (formerly, Intergy Corporation) on June 9, 2008, we agreed to make potential earn-out payments of up to
$6,160,000 to the sellers if Willdan Energy Solutions achieves certain levels of earnings before interest and taxes in each of the first three years following completion of the acquisition. If any
earn-out payments are due, we may elect, in our sole discretion, to pay up to 50% of such earn-out payments in shares of our common stock as long as (a) our market
capitalization at the time of any such earn-out payment is between $57.0 million and $86.0 million and (b) the shares of common stock are traded on a United States
national securities exchange or reported through NASDAQ as of the end of the applicable period for which the earn-out was achieved. If the Average Daily Trading Volume (as defined in the
Stock Purchase Agreement) of our common stock as of the end of an applicable earn-out period is less than 0.42% of our then-issued and outstanding common stock, we may not pay
more than 25% of the applicable earn-out payment in shares of our common stock. We did not elect to issue any shares in connection with the earn-out payments due in 2009 or
2010.

The
issuance of shares in connection with the acquisition were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions
by an issuer not involving any public offering. The purchasers were provided financial and other information

28

---



Table of Contents

concerning
us and were allowed the opportunity to ask questions and receive information from us prior to making their investment decisions. The purchasers represented their intention to acquire the
securities for investment purposes and not with a view to sell or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof. Based on the limited nature of the offering, the level of knowledge and
relationships of the purchasers with us, the provision and access to information and the restrictions on transfer, we believe our offering satisfied the Section 4(2) exemption of the Act.



None.

29

---



Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our corresponding consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this annual report.

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008

2007

2006(in thousands except per share amounts)Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:Contract revenue

$
77,896

$
61,605

$
73,190

$
78,798

$
78,339Direct costs of contract revenue:Salaries and wages


21,607


18,130


21,991


25,769


24,602Subconsultant services


16,523


7,997


7,750


4,600


4,168Other direct costs


3,892


2,715


2,973


1,568


1,496Total direct costs of contract revenue


42,022


28,842


32,714


31,937


30,266General and administrative expenses:Salaries and wages, payroll taxes, employee benefits


17,582


20,325


24,439


25,061


26,051Facilities and facility related


4,290


4,430


4,803


4,546


4,046Stock-based compensation


235


272


214


209


38Depreciation and amortization


1,042


1,814


1,978


1,747


1,584Lease abandonment, net


(68
)

707


742





Impairment of goodwill





2,763


148





Litigation accrual (reversal)





(1,125
)




1,049


(1,049Other


9,719


11,070


10,952


11,727


10,359Total general and administrative expenses


32,800


40,256


43,276


44,339


41,029Income (loss) from operations


3,074


(7,493
)

(2,800
)

2,522


7,044Other (expense) income:Interest income


12


30


313


693


135Interest expense


(54
)

(38
)

(33
)

499


(773
)Other, net


32


(5
)

(15
)

(27
)

2,335Total other (expense) income, net


(10
)

(13
)

265


1,165


1,697Income (loss) before income tax expense


3,064


(7,506
)

(2,535
)

3,687


8,741Income tax expense (benefit)


344


(1,931
)

(930
)

1,543


2,021Net income (loss)

$
2,720

$
(5,575
)
$
(1,605
)
$
2,144

$
6,720Earnings (loss) per common share:Basic

$
0.38

$
(0.78
)
$
(0.22
)
$
0.30

$
1.37Diluted

$
0.37

$
(0.78
)
$
(0.22
)
$
0.30

$
1.37Weighted average common shares outstanding:Basic


7,233


7,192


7,159


7,149


4,900Diluted


7,311


7,192


7,159


7,150


4,900S Corporation distributions paid per share(1)













$
1.16Pro Forma Data (unaudited)(1):Pro forma provision for income taxes













$
2,596Pro forma net income













$
6,145Pro forma earnings per common share, basic and diluted













$
1.25Other Operating Data (unaudited):Adjusted EBITDA(2)

$
4,074

$
(3,333
)
$
68

$
5,326

$
7,651Revenue per employee(3)

$
144

$
132

$
133

$
132

$
131Employee headcount at period end(4)


540


466


550


628


670


30

---



Table of Contents



Fiscal Year EndedDecember 31,
2010

January 1,
2010

January 2,
2009

December 28,
2007

December 29,
2006Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:Cash and cash equivalents

$
6,642

$
8,445

$
8,144

$
15,511

$
20,633Working capital


18,060


16,704


19,820


30,171


26,721Total assets


49,454


40,332


47,570


48,226


57,108Total indebtedness


1,490


1,230


394


1,547


1,632Total stockholders' equity


32,162


29,117


34,336


35,652


33,264


(1)Prior
to our initial public offering in November 2006, we were taxed as an S Corporation for purposes of federal and state income taxes. As a result of that
offering, our S Corporation status terminated and we are now taxed as a C Corporation under federal and state tax laws. The pro forma data reflects combined federal and state income taxes on a pro
forma basis as if we had been taxed as a C Corporation during those periods using an effective tax rate of 40%.(2)Adjusted
EBITDA is a supplemental measure used by our management to measure our operating performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus
net interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization, goodwill impairment expense, lease abandonment (recovery) expense, loss (gains) on sales of assets, accrued expenses
related to a litigation matter, less proceeds from life insurance policies carried on our former chief executive officer. Our definition of Adjusted EBITDA may differ from those of many companies
reporting similarly named measures. This measure should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, such as operating income and net income. We believe Adjusted EBITDA enables management to separate non-recurring income and expense
items from our results of operations to provide a more normalized and consistent view of operating performance on a period-to-period basis. We use Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate
our performance for, among other things, budgeting, forecasting and incentive compensation purposes. We also believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors, research analysts, investment bankers and
lenders because it removes from our operational results the impact of certain non-recurring income and expense items, which may facilitate comparison of our results from period to period.
Adjusted
EBITDA is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to operating income or net income as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP measure

The
following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):


Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008

2007

2006Net income (loss)

$
2,720

$
(5,575
)
$
(1,605
)
$
2,144

$
6,720Interest income


(12
)

(30
)

(313
)

(693
)

(135
)Interest expense (reversal)


54


38


33


(499
)

773Income tax expense (benefit)


344


(1,931
)

(930
)

1,543


2,021Lease abandonment (recovery) expense


(68
)

707


742





Goodwill impairment





2,763


148





Depreciation and amortization


1,053


1,814


1,978


1,755


1,584(Gain) loss on sale of assets


(17
)

6


15


27


(13
)Life insurance proceeds














(2,250
)Litigation (reversal) accrual





(1,125
)




1,049


(1,049
)Adjusted EBITDA

$
4,074

$
(3,333
)
$
68

$
5,326

$
7,651


(3)Reflects
contract revenue, excluding revenue related to reimbursement of subconsultants and other costs, divided by the average number of
full-time equivalent employees during the period.(4)Includes
full-time and part-time employees.


31

---





Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are a provider of professional technical and consulting services to small and mid-sized public agencies, large public
utilities and, to a lesser extent, private industry primarily in California, New York, Arizona. We enable these agencies to provide a wide range of specialized services, without having to incur and
maintain the overhead necessary to develop staffing in-house, by providing a broad range of services including:



We
operate our business through a network of offices located primarily in California and New York. We also have operations in Arizona and, to lesser extent, other states throughout the
United States. As of December 31, 2010, we had a staff of 540 that includes licensed engineers and other professionals. Based on our 2009 revenue, we ranked 177 out of 500 top design firms in Engineering
News-Record's2010 Design Survey. Our traditional clients have been public agencies in communities with populations ranging from
10,000 to 300,000 people. We believe communities of this size are underserved by large outsourcing companies that tend to focus on securing large federal and state projects, as well as projects for
the private sector. We also provide services to large public utilities which service major metropolitan communities. We seek to establish close working relationships with our public agency clients
and, over time, to expand the breadth and depth of the services we provide to them.

While
we currently serve communities throughout the country, our business with public agencies is concentrated in California and neighboring states. We provide services to approximately
58% of the 481 cities and over 60% of the 58 counties in California. We also serve special districts, school districts, a range of public agencies, and to a lesser extent, private industry. Our
business with large public utilities is concentrated in California and New York.

We
were founded over 45 years ago, and today consist of a family of wholly owned companies that operate within the following segments for financial reporting
purposes:



32

---



Table of Contents



In
fiscal 2008 and 2009, general economic conditions declined due to a number of factors including slower economic activity, a lack of available credit, decreased consumer confidence and
reduced corporate profits and capital spending, leading to a slowdown in construction, particularly residential housing construction, in the western United States. As a result of this slowdown, both
our engineering services segment and public finance services segment suffered declines in revenue and operating margin compression. While economic conditions began to improve in fiscal 2010, the
recovery has been slow, particularly with regard to our traditional engineering services and public finance services.

Components of Income and Expense

Contract Revenue

We enter into contracts with our clients that contain three principal types of pricing provisions: fixed price,
time-and-materials and unit-based. Contract revenue on our fixed price contracts is determined on the percentage-of-completion method based
generally on the ratio of direct costs incurred to date to estimated total direct costs at completion. Many of our fixed price contracts are relatively short in duration, thereby lowering the risks of
not properly estimating the percent complete. Revenue on our time-and-materials and unit-based contracts are recognized as the work is performed in accordance with
specific terms of the contract. Approximately 44% of our contracts are based on contractual rates per hour plus costs incurred. Some of these contracts include maximum contract prices, but the
majority of these contracts are not expected to exceed the maximum.

Adjustments
to contract cost estimates are made in the periods in which the facts requiring such revisions become known. When the revised estimate indicates a loss, such loss is provided
for currently in its entirety. Claims revenue is recognized only upon resolution of the claim. Change orders in dispute are evaluated as claims. Costs related to un-priced change orders
are expensed when incurred and recognition of the related contract revenue is based on an evaluation of the probability of recovery of the costs. Estimated profit is recognized for
un-priced change orders if realization of the expected price of the change order is probable.

Direct Costs of Contract Revenue

Direct costs of contract revenue consist primarily of that portion of technical and nontechnical salaries and wages that has been
incurred in connection with revenue producing projects. Direct costs of contract revenue also include production expenses, sub-consultant services and other expenses that are incurred in
connection with revenue producing projects. Direct costs of contract revenue exclude depreciation and amortization, that portion of technical and nontechnical salaries and wages related to marketing
efforts, vacations, holidays and other time not spent directly generating revenue under existing contracts. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses. Additionally, payroll taxes,
bonuses and employee benefit costs for all of our personnel are included in general and administrative expenses since no allocation of these costs is made to direct costs of contract revenue. No
allocation of facilities costs is made to direct costs of contract revenue nor is depreciation and amortization allocated to direct costs. We expense direct costs of contract revenue when incurred.

As
a firm that provides multiple and diverse outsource services, we do not believe gross margin is a consistent or appropriate indicator of our performance and therefore we do not use
this measure as
construction contractors and other types of consulting firms may. Other companies may classify as direct costs of contract revenue some of the costs that we classify as general and administrative
expenses. As a result, our direct costs of contract revenue may not be comparable to direct costs for other companies, either as a line item expense or as a percentage of contract revenue.

33

---



Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses include the costs of the marketing and support staffs, other marketing expenses, management and
administrative personnel costs, payroll taxes, bonuses and employee benefits for all of our employees and the portion of salaries and wages not allocated to direct costs of contract revenue for those
employees who provide our services. General and administrative expenses also include facility costs, depreciation and amortization, professional services, legal and accounting fees and administrative
operating costs. Within general and administrative expenses, "Other" includes expenses such as professional services, legal and accounting, computer costs, travel and entertainment and marketing
costs. We expense general and administrative costs when incurred.

Critical Accounting Policies

This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or GAAP. To prepare these financial statements in conformity with GAAP, we must make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. Our actual
results may differ from these estimates. We have provided a summary of our significant accounting policies in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
We describe below those accounting policies that require material subjective or complex judgments and that have the most significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Our
management evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon information currently available and on various assumptions management believes are reasonable as of the date of this report.

Contract Accounting

Applying the percentage-of-completion method of recognizing revenue requires us to estimate the outcome of our
long-term contracts. We forecast such outcomes to the best of our knowledge and belief of current and expected conditions and our expected course of action. Differences between our
estimates and actual results often occur resulting in changes to reported revenue and earnings. Such changes could have a material effect on our future consolidated financial statements.

Accounts
receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based upon our review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. We determine
the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. Our credit risk is minimal with governmental entities. Account
receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recorded when received. For further information on the types of contracts under
which we perform our services, see "BusinessContract Structure" elsewhere in this report.

Goodwill

We test goodwill, at least annually, for possible impairment. Accordingly, we complete our annual testing of goodwill as of the last
day of the first month of our fourth fiscal quarter each year to determine whether there is impairment. In addition to our annual test, we regularly evaluate whether events and circumstances have
occurred that may indicate a potential impairment of goodwill. We recognized impairment charges for fiscal year 2009 related to our Public Finance Services reporting unit and for fiscal year 2008
related to our Homeland Security Services reporting unit. Neither our Public Finance Services reporting unit nor our Homeland Security Services reporting unit have any remaining goodwill following
these impairment charges. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges in fiscal year 2010.

34

---



Table of Contents

We
test our goodwill for impairment at the level of our reporting units, which are components of our operating segments. The reporting unit that still has a material amount of goodwill
is Willdan Energy Solutions, which is part of our engineering services segment. The process of testing goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair value of the applicable reporting
units. To estimate
the fair value of our reporting units, we have historically used an income approach based on management's estimates of future cash flows and other market data. In fiscal year 2008, we expanded our
methodology to include a market approach based upon multiples of EBITDA earned by similar public companies. For our fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 annual impairment testing, we weighted the income
approach and the market approach at 80% and 20%, respectively. The income approach was given a higher weight because it has a more direct correlation to the specific economics of the reporting units
than the market approach, which is based on multiples of public companies that, although comparable, may not provide the same mix of services as our reporting units.

Once
the fair value is determined, we then compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is determined
to be less than the carrying value, we perform an additional assessment to determine the extent of the impairment based on the implied fair value of goodwill compared with the carrying amount of the
goodwill. In the event that the current implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized.

Inherent
in such fair value determinations are significant judgments and estimates, including but not limited to assumptions about our future revenue, profitability and cash flows, our
operational plans and our interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations. To the extent these assumptions are incorrect or economic conditions that would impact the future
operations of our reporting units change, our goodwill may be deemed to be impaired, and an impairment charge could result in a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of
operation. At our measurement date, the estimated fair value of our energy solutions reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. If the estimated fair value decreases by 10% we could have an implied
impairment charge of $0.3 million.

Accounting for Claims Against the Company

We record liabilities to claimants for probable and estimable claims, if any, on our consolidated balance sheet, which we include in
accrued liabilities, and record a corresponding receivable from our insurance company for the portion of the claim that is probable of being covered by insurance, which is included in other
receivables. The estimated claim amount net of the amount estimated to be recoverable from the insurance company is included in our general and administrative expenses. Determining probability and
estimating claim amounts is highly judgmental. Initial accruals and any subsequent changes in our estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of our assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets may not be
realized.

We
recognize the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions if it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities, based on the
technical merits of the

35

---



Table of Contents

position.
The tax benefit is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information derived from our consolidated statements of operations
expressed as a percentage of contract revenue. Amounts may not add to the totals due to rounding.

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Statement of Operations Data:Contract revenue


100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%Direct costs of contract revenueSalaries and wages


27.7


29.4


30.0Subconsultant services


21.2


13.0


10.6Other direct costs


5.0


4.4


4.1Total direct costs of contract revenue


53.9


46.8


44.7General and administrative expenses:Salaries and wages, payroll taxes, employee benefits


22.6


33.0


33.4Facilities and facility related


5.5


7.2


6.6Stock-based compensation


0.3


0.4


0.3Depreciation and amortization


1.3


2.9


2.7Lease (recovery) abandonment,net


(0.1
)

1.1


1.0Impairment of goodwill





4.5


0.2Litigation reversal





(1.8
)

Other


12.5


18.0


15.0Total general and administrative expenses


42.1


65.3


59.1Income (loss) from operations


3.9


(12.2
)

(3.8
)Other income (expense):Interest income








0.4Interest expense


(0.1
)

(0.1
)

Other, net








Total other income (expense), net








0.4Income (loss) before income taxes


3.9


(12.2
)

(3.5
)Income tax expense (benefit)


0.4


(3.1
)

(1.3
)Net income (loss)


3.5
%

(9.0
)%

(2.2
)%


Fiscal Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009

Contract revenue.Our contract revenue was $77.9 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, with $62.2 million
attributable to the Engineering Services segment and $10.4 million attributable to the Public Finance Services segment. Our Homeland Security Services segment generated $5.3 million
during this period. Consolidated contract revenue increased $16.3 million, or 26.5%, to $77.9 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from $61.6 million in the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. This increase was due primarily to an increase of $15.9 million, or 34.3%, in contract revenue of the Engineering Service segment primarily as a result
of the increase in demand for the

36

---



Table of Contents

energy
efficiency, sustainability and renewable energy services of our subsidiary, Willdan Energy Solutions. Contract revenue in the Homeland Security Services segment increased $1.8 million,
or 51.4%, to $5.3 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from $3.5 million in the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. Contract revenue for our Public Finance
Services segment decreased $1.4 million, or 11.9%, to $10.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from $11.8 million in the fiscal year ended January 1,
2010.

The
$15.9 million increase in contract revenue for the Engineering Services segment resulted from an increase of $16.7 million of revenue recognized by Willdan Energy
Solutions in fiscal 2010, partially offset by decreases in other areas of the Engineering Services segment. Contract revenue for Willdan Energy Solutions increased primarily because of increased
demand for energy efficiency services in the state of New York. Contract revenue for other areas of the Engineering Services segment continues to be impacted by the decline in the California
residential housing market and state and local government budget cuts. A source of revenue in our Engineering Services segment is fees assessed for building permits. Since the second half of fiscal
2007, we have experienced reductions in revenue from these fees because of the slowdown in residential construction in the western United States. We have also experienced a decline in our other
building and safety projects which is both directly and indirectly affected by the housing market. Revenue in the Public Finance Services segment decreased primarily due to lower levels of activity in
the financial consulting business as a result of the general downturn in macro-economic conditions. Revenue in the Homeland Security Services segment has increased due to an increase in demand for our
traditional and expanded homeland security, management consulting and public safety consulting services. Our Homeland Security Services segment also expanded its service offerings beyond its
traditional planning, training and exercise services to include public safety and interoperability communications and management consulting.

Direct costs of contract revenue.Direct costs of contract revenue was $42.0 million for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010, with
$36.8 million attributable to the Engineering Services segment and $2.8 million attributable to the Public Finance Services segment. The additional $2.4 million is attributable to
direct costs of contract revenue for our Homeland Security Services segment. Overall, direct costs of contract revenue increased by $13.2 million, or 45.8%, to $42.0 million for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from $28.8 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in direct costs within our
Engineering Services segment of $13.0 million, or 54.6%, and $0.7 million, or 41.2%, in the Homeland Security Services segment. Direct costs of contract revenue decreased by
$0.5 million, or 15.2%, in our Public Finance Services segment due to decreased levels of activity in the Public Finances Services segment. Direct costs of contract revenue as a percentage of
contract revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 increased to 53.9% from 46.8% for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010.

Direct
costs increased as a result of increases in salaries and wages, sub-consultant services and other direct costs of $3.5 million, $9.0 million and
$0.7 million, respectively. Within direct costs of contract revenue, salaries and wages decreased to 27.7% of contract revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from 29.4% for
the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010 and sub-consultant services increased to 21.2% of contract revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from 13.0% of contract
revenue for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. Subconsultant services increased primarily because of increased demand for the energy efficiency, sustainability and renewable energy services
of our subsidiary Willdan Energy Solutions, which generally utilizes a higher percentage of subconsultants than our other subsidiaries. Increased chargeability of labor also shifted more employee
related costs to direct costs of contract revenue because we only allocate the portion of salaries and wages related to time spent directly generating revenues to direct costs of contract revenue.

General and administrative expenses.General and administrative expenses decreased by $7.5 million, or 18.6%, to
$32.8 million for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from $40.3 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. This was due primarily to decreases of $5.0 million and

37

---



Table of Contents

$3.4 million,
in the General and administrative expenses of the Engineering Services and Public Finance Services segments, respectively. General and administrative expenses for the Homeland
Security Services segment and unallocated corporate expenses increased by $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of contract
revenue decreased to 42.1% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from 65.3% for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010.

Of
the $7.5 million decrease in general and administrative expenses, approximately $2.7 million relates to decreases in salaries and wages, payroll taxes and employee
benefits. The reduction in employee related costs primarily resulted from increased chargeability of labor which shifted more employee related costs to direct costs of contract revenue. As discussed
above under "Components of Income and Expense-Direct Costs of Contract Revenue," we do not allocate that portion of salaries and wages
not related to time spent directly generating revenue to direct costs of contract revenue. General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 also included
decreases of $2.8 million in impairment of goodwill charges and $0.8 million as a result of a decrease in lease abandonment charges. Our lease abandonment charges decreased because we
were able to successfully renew certain abandoned facility lease terms on more favorable terms. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.8 million primarily as a result of the
decrease in the amortization of acquired intangible assets. Other general and administrative expenses decreased $1.4 million due to a decrease in bad debt expense, net of increases in
miscellaneous expenses. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in litigation accrual charges of $1.1 million.

Income
(loss) from operations.As a result of the above factors, income from operations was $3.1 million for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to a loss from operations of $7.5 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. Income from operations, as a percentage of
contract revenue, increased to 3.9% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, from (12.2)% for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010.

Other (expense) income.Other (expense) income, net, essentially remained flat for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as
compared to the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2010.

Income tax expense (benefit).Income tax expense was $0.3 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to
an income
tax benefit of $1.9 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010. The increase was principally related to higher pre-tax income in 2010, partially offset by a reversal
of the $0.9 million of valuation allowance in the current year.

Net income (loss).As a result of the above factors, our net income was $2.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010,
compared to a net loss of $5.6 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010.



Contract revenue.Our contract revenue was $61.6 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010, with $46.3 million
attributable to the Engineering Services segment and $11.8 million attributable to the Public Finance Services segment. Our Homeland Security Services segment generated $3.5 million
during this period. Consolidated contract revenue decreased $11.6 million, or 15.8%, from $73.2 million in the fiscal year ended January 1, 2009. This decrease was due primarily
to a decrease of $11.0 million, or 19.2%, in contract revenue of the Engineering Service segment, and a decrease of $1.9 million, or 13.9%, in our Public Finance Services segment, offset
by an increase of $1.3 million, or 59.1%, in contract revenue of our Homeland Security Services segment.

Contract
revenue of the Engineering Services segment has been significantly impacted by the decline in the California residential housing market and state and local government budget
deficits. A historical significant source of revenue in our Engineering Services segment is fees assessed for building

38

---



Table of Contents

permits.
Since the second half of fiscal 2007, we have experienced reductions in revenue from these fees because of the continuing slowdown in residential construction in the western United States.
Revenue declines in the Public Finance Services segment were primarily due to decreased financial consulting services and fewer new district formations to fund infrastructure projects, partially
offset by increased delinquency management services. Revenue in Homeland Security Services has increased due to an increase in our emergency response training courses and exercises, emergency
operations planning and other public safety and management consulting services.

Direct costs of contract revenue.Direct costs of contract revenue was $28.8 million for the fiscal year ended January 1,
2010, with
$23.8 million attributable to the Engineering Services segment and $3.3 million attributable to the Public Finance Services segment. The additional $1.7 million is attributable to
direct costs of contract revenue for our Homeland Security Services segment. Direct costs of contract revenue decreased $3.9 million, or 11.9%, from $32.7 million for the fiscal year
ended January 2, 2009. Of this total decrease, direct costs of contract revenue decreased $4.0 million, or 14.4%, in the Engineering Services segment and $0.4 million, or 10.8%,
in the Public Finance Services segment. The $0.5 million difference was attributable to an increase in cost in our Homeland Security Services segment. The decrease in direct costs of contract
revenue for our Engineering Services segment and Public Finance Services segment is primarily due to decreased direct salary costs. Direct costs of contract revenue as a percentage of contract revenue
for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010 increased to 46.8% from 44.7% for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009, primarily because contract revenue decreased at a higher rate than the
direct costs.

Within
direct costs of contract revenue, salaries and wages decreased to 29.4% of contract revenue for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010 from 30.0% for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2009. Comparing those same periods, sub-consultant services increased to 13.0% of contract revenue from 10.6% of contract revenue. Sub-consultant costs
increased primarily due to our activity
associated with our energy efficiency practice in our Engineering Services segment where we outsource installation services.

General and administrative expenses.General and administrative expenses decreased by $2.9 million, or 6.7%, to $40.3 million
for the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2010 from $43.2 million for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009. Of the net $2.9 million decrease, $4.1 million was due to a decrease
in salaries and wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits. The reduction in employee related costs are the direct result of continued cost reduction efforts. Included in general and administrative
expenses for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010 is $2.7 million in goodwill impairment charges and $0.7 million in lease abandonment expense, which were partially offset by a
favorable legal settlement of $1.1 million.

Lease
abandonment expense includes future rental obligations and other costs associated with leased space that we have ceased to use, offset by future proceeds from sublease
arrangements.

As
discussed above under "Components of Income and Expense-Direct Costs of Contract Revenue," we do not allocate that portion of salaries and wages not related to time spent
directly generating revenue to direct costs of contract revenue.

Loss from operations.As a result of the above factors, loss from operations was $7.5 million for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 2010
as compared to $2.8 million for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009. Loss from operations, as a percentage of contract revenue, decreased to (12.2)% for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 2010, from (3.8)% for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009.

Other (expense) income.Other (expense) income, net, decreased by $0.3 million to an expense of $13,000 in the fiscal year ended
January 1, 2010 from income of $0.3 million for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009. This change was primarily due to a decrease in interest income from invested funds.

39

---



Table of Contents

Income tax benefit.Income tax benefit was $1.9 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010, as compared to
$0.9 million
for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009. During fiscal year 2009, we recorded a $0.9 million valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in excess of the deferred tax liability for
deferred revenue.

Net loss.As a result of the above factors, our net loss was $5.6 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2010, compared
to
$1.6 million for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2010, we had $6.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash
generated from operations and borrowings under our revolving line of credit. We believe that our cash on hand, cash generated by operating activities and funds available under our credit facility will
be sufficient to finance our operating activities for at least the next 12 months.



Cash flows provided by operating activities were $0.1 million for fiscal year 2010 compared to $2.2 million for fiscal
year 2009 and $3.5 million for fiscal year 2008. The cash flows provided by operating activities in fiscal 2010 were lower than in fiscal 2009, despite higher net income, due primarily to
increases in accounts receivable, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts and fewer adjustments for non-cash items partially offset by increases in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The cash flows provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2009 were comparatively lower than in fiscal year 2008 due primarily to a higher net loss
partially offset by non-cash impairment charges related to goodwill, lease abandonment expenses and the collection of the income tax receivable accrued during fiscal year 2008. The cash
flows provided by operating activities in fiscal 2008 also included an increase in collection of accounts receivable and the payment of accrued liabilities related to litigation accrued in fiscal
2007, net of amounts paid for by our insurance company.



Cash flows used in investing activities were $2.7 million for fiscal year 2010 compared to $2.8 million for fiscal year
2009 and $9.5 million for fiscal year 2008. Payments related to business acquisitions, in fiscal 2010 were $2.1 million, as compared to $2.4 million in fiscal 2009 and
$10.2 million in fiscal 2008. These payments were in accordance with the provisions of the stock purchase agreement for the 2008 purchase of Willdan Energy Solutions, formerly known as Intergy
Corp. Fiscal year 2008 also contained purchases of liquid investments and proceeds from sales of liquid investments. Aside from payments for business acquisitions, our cash used in investing
activities is primarily related to the purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements.



Cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal 2010 was $0.8 million as compared to $0.9 million for fiscal year
2009 and cash flows used in financing activities of $1.4 million for fiscal year 2008. The net cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal 2010 was primarily attributable to changes
in the excess of outstanding checks over bank balance. The net cash flows provided in 2009 was primarily attributable to borrowings under our line of credit to support working capital needs. The cash
used in financing activities for fiscal year 2008 was the result of notes payable of $1.1 million.



We currently have a revolving line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"), which was last amended on
October 15, 2010. We have also financed, from time to time,

40

---



Table of Contents

insurance
premiums by entering into unsecured notes payable with insurance companies. During our annual insurance renewals in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we
elected not to finance our insurance premiums for the upcoming fiscal year.

Under
the terms of our credit agreement with Wells Fargo, we can borrow up to $5.0 million from time to time (as may be limited by the covenants in the credit agreement as
discussed below) up to and until January 1, 2012. Loans made under the revolving line of credit will accrue interest at either (i) the floating rate equal to the prime rate in effect
from time to time or (ii) the fixed rate of 1.75% above LIBOR, at our election. For prime rate loans, the interest rate will be adjusted when each prime rate change by the bank is announced and
becomes effective. There were outstanding borrowings of $1.0 million under this agreement as of December 31, 2010.

Borrowings
under the credit agreement are secured by all of our accounts receivable and other rights to payment, general intangibles, inventory and equipment, including those of our
subsidiaries. In addition, borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by investment property we hold in a securities account at Wells Fargo that must at all times have a collateral value of at
least $5.0 million. Each of our subsidiaries (except Public Agency Resources) has signed an unconditional guaranty of our obligations under the agreements.

The
credit agreement contains customary representations and affirmative covenants, including a covenant to maintain a tangible net worth of at least $18.0 million at all times.
Tangible net worth is defined in the credit agreement as stockholders' equity less intangible assets and loans or advances to,
or investments in, any related entities or individuals. As of December 31, 2010, our tangible net worth as defined under our credit agreement was $20.1 million(1).

---

The
following is a reconciliation of stockholders' equity to tangible net worth:

Year Ended
December 31, 2010Stockholders' equity

$
32,162,000Goodwill and other intangibles, net


(12,570,000
)Permitted lease abandonment


531,000Tangible net worth

$
20,123,000


41

---





Table of Contents

Prior to the amendment of the credit agreement in March 2009, the credit agreement contained additional financial covenants, including minimum net income and
maximum net loss covenants. We breached our minimum net income covenant for the quarter ended September 26, 2008 and, in exchange for Wells Fargo's waiver of this breach, we amended our credit
agreement in December 2008 to reduce the amount available under the facility from $10.0 million to $5.0 million and to revise the financial covenants under the facility. We also breached
our maximum net loss covenant for the year ended January 2, 2009 by sustaining net losses before taxes greater than $1.0 million. In March 2009, Wells Fargo waived this breach and
eliminated or modified certain financial covenants in the credit agreement in exchange for increased pricing and additional collateral being provided.

The
credit agreement also includes customary negative covenants, including a covenant that prohibits the incurrence of additional indebtedness by us or our subsidiaries other than
purchase money indebtedness not to exceed $2.0 million and indebtedness existing on the date of the credit agreement, and a covenant that prohibits payment of dividends on our stock and
redemptions, repurchases or other acquisitions of our stock; provided that we can repurchase stock with an aggregate fair market value up to $5.0 million in any calendar year. In addition, the
credit agreement includes customary events of default for a credit facility. Upon a default, the interest rate will be increased by a default rate margin of 4.0%. Upon the occurrence of an event of
default under the credit agreement, including a breach of any of the covenants discussed above, Wells Fargo has the option to make any loans then outstanding under the credit agreement immediately due
and payable and is no longer obligated to extend further credit to us under the credit agreement.



We have certain cash obligations and other commitments which will impact our short- and long-term liquidity. At
December 31, 2010, such obligations and commitments consisted of long-term debt, operating leases and capital leases. The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as
of December 31, 2010:

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than
1 Year

1 - 3 Years

3 - 5 Years

More than
5 YearsLong term debt(1)

$
1,220,000

$
1,087,000

$
128,000

$
5,000

$
Operating leases


10,247,000


3,535,000


4,549,000


2,163,000


Capital leases


329,000


207,000


122,000





Total contractual cash obligations

$
11,796,000

$
4,829,000

$
4,799,000

$
2,168,000

$



(1)Long-term
debt includes principal and interest payments under our debt agreements assuming no additional borrowings or principal payments and
includes borrowings under our line of credit of $1,000,000.


New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a standard entitled"The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,a replacement of FASB No. 162."This standard establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification"), as the single source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting standards applicable for all
non-government entities, with the exception of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and interpretative releases. The Codification, which changes the referencing of financial
standards, is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after September 15, 2009. As the Codification is not intended to change or alter existing U.S. GAAP, the adoption
of the standard did not have any effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

42

---



Table of Contents

In
April 2008, the FASB issued a standard entitled"Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets."This standard amends the
factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under the standard for goodwill and other intangible
assets. The new standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted the standard on January 3, 2009 and this had no effect on our financial statements.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, to fair values or to future cash flows that may result from changes in the price of
a financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes. Market risk
is attributed to all market risk sensitive financial instruments, including long-term debt.

We
had cash and cash equivalents of $6.6 million as of December 31, 2010. This amount includes $0.8 million invested in the Wells Fargo Stage Coach Sweep Investment
Account and $5.3 million invested in the Wells Fargo Money Market Mutual Fund. Although these investments are subject to variable interest rates, we do not believe we are subject to significant
market risk for these short-term investments.

We
do not engage in trading activities and do not participate in foreign currency transactions or utilize derivative financial instruments. As of December 31, 2010, we had
$1.0 million outstanding debt under our revolving credit facility that bears interest at variable rates.

43

---





Table of Contents

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements and related financial information, as listed under Item 15, appear in a separate section of this annual
report beginning on page F-1.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements



PageReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmErnst & Young LLP


F-1Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmKPMG LLP


F-2Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010


F-3Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2010


F-4Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2010


F-5Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2010


F-6Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


F-7


44

---



Table of Contents

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no changes in and/or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the year ended
December 31, 2010.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as controls and
other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief
Executive Officer, Thomas Brisbin, and our Chief Financial Officer, Kimberly Gant, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In
connection with the preparation of this Annual Report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective based on these criteria.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control
over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that
permit the company to provide only management's report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Controls

Based on our evaluation carried out in accordance with SEC Rule 15d-15(b) under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we concluded that there were no changes during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010
of our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

None.

45

---



Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the Company's 2010 fiscal year.

We
have posted our Code of Ethical Conduct on our website, www.willdan.com, under the heading "InvestorsCorporate Governance." The Code of Ethical Conduct applies to our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Upon request and free of charge, we will provide any person with a copy of the Code of Ethical Conduct. See "Item 1.
BusinessAvailable Information."

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the Company's 2010 fiscal year.

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the Company's 2010 fiscal year.

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the Company's 2010 fiscal year.

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the Company's 2010 fiscal year.

46

---





Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



The
following financial statements of Willdan Group, Inc. and report of independent auditors are included in Item 8 of this annual report and submitted in a separate
section beginning on page F-1:



PageReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmErnst & Young LLP

F-1Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmKPMG LLP

F-2Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010

F-3Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2010

F-4Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2010

F-5Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2010

F-6Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7




All
required schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the accompanying notes.



The
exhibits filed as part of this annual report are listed in Item 15(b).

The
following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description2.1

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2008, by and among Willdan Group, Inc., Intergy Corporation and the Stockholders of Intergy Corporation(1)3.1

Articles of Incorporation of Willdan Group, Inc., including amendments thereto(2)3.2

Bylaws of Willdan Group, Inc.(2)4.1

Specimen Stock Certificate for shares of the Registrant's Common Stock(2)4.2

The Company agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of each instrument with respect to issues of long-term debt of Willdan Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, the authorized
principal amount of which does not exceed 10% of the consolidated assets of Willdan Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.10.1

Credit Agreement, dated December 28, 2007, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, relating to the Revolving Line of Credit Note in 10.6(3)10.2

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 8, 2008, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(4)


47

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description10.3

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated June 9, 2008, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(4)10.4

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, entered into on December 19, 2008, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(5)10.5

Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, entered into on March 30, 2009, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(6)10.6

Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, entered into on November 9, 2009, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(7)10.7

Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, entered into on October 15, 2010, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(8)10.8

Revolving Line of Credit Note for $5,000,000, dated October 15, 2010, by Willdan Group, Inc. in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(8)10.9

Security Agreement: Equipment, dated December 28, 2007, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, relating to the Revolving Line of Credit Note in 10.6(3)10.10

Continuing Security Agreement: Rights to Payment and Inventory, dated December 28, 2007, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, relating to the Revolving Line of Credit Note
in 10.6(3)10.11

Security Agreement: Securities Account, dated March 30, 2009, between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, relating to the Revolving Line of Credit Note in 10.6(6)10.12

Willdan Group, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan(2)10.13

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement(2)10.14

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement(2)10.15

Amended and Restated Willdan Group, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(9)10.16

Willdan Group, Inc. 2008 Performance Incentive Plan(10)10.17

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and its Directors and Officers(2)10.18

Office Lease by and between Spectrum Waples Street, LLC, a California limited liability company, Spectrum Lambert Plaza, LLC, a California limited liability company and The Willdan Group of Companies dated
October 15, 2004 for the principal office located at 2401 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California(2)10.19

First Amendment to Lease by and between 2401 Katella, LLC and The Willdan Group of Companies, dated February 27, 2006 for the principal office located at 2401 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California(2)10.20

Second Amendment to Lease by and between 2401 Katella, LLC and The Willdan Group of Companies dated March 6, 2006 for the principal office located at 2401 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California(2)10.21

Warrant Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc.(2)10.22

Indemnification Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and Linda Heil(2)


48

---



Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description10.23

Employment Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and Thomas D. Brisbin dated April 2, 2007(11)10.24

Employment Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and Kimberly D. Gant dated July 23, 2007(12)10.25

Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between Willdan Group, Inc. and Kimberly D. Gant dated April 22, 2009(13)10.26

Offer Letter from Willdan Group, Inc. to Daniel Chow dated October 29, 2008 and accepted November 9, 2008(14)10.27

Employment Agreement dated May 22, 2007 between Marc Tipermas and Willdan Group, Inc.(15)14.1

Code of Ethical Conduct of Willdan Group, Inc.(9)21.1

Subsidiaries of Willdan Group, Inc.*23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmErnst & Young LLP*23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmKPMG LLP*24.1

Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto)31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*32.1

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*


*Filed
herewith.Indicates
a management contract or compensating plan or arrangement.(1)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 9, 2008.(2)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 9, 2006, as amended (File No. 333-136444).(3)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on January 2, 2008.(4)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 11, 2008.(5)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on December 23, 2008.(6)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on April 2, 2009.


49

---



Table of Contents

(7)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 12, 2009.(8)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 15, 2010.(9)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 27, 2007.(10)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 12, 2010.(11)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on April 3, 2007.(12)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on July 26, 2007.(13)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 14, 2009.(14)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on December 17, 2008.(15)Incorporated
by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 11, 2009.


50

---





Table of Contents

SIGNATURES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Anaheim, State of California, on March 29, 2011.

WILLDAN GROUP, INC./s/ KIMBERLY D. GANT Kimberly D. Gant Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice PresidentDate: March 29, 2011


KNOW
ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Kimberly D. Gant his/her attorney-in-fact, with the
power of substitution, for him/her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with Exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or substitute or substitutes may do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date/s/ THOMAS D. BRISBIN Thomas D. Brisbin

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2011/s/ KIMBERLY D. GANT Kimberly D. Gant

Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

March 29, 2011/s/ WIN WESTFALL Win Westfall

Director

March 29, 2011/s/ LINDA L. HEIL Linda L. Heil

Director

March 29, 2011/s/ W. TRACY LENOCKER W. Tracy Lenocker

Director

March 29, 2011/s/ KEITH W. RENKEN Keith W. Renken

Director

March 29, 2011


51

---



Table of Contents

Signature

Title

Date/s/ WAYNE SHELTON Wayne Shelton

Director

March 29, 2011/s/ JOHN M. TOUPS John M. Toups

Director

March 29, 2011/s/ RAYMOND W. HOLDSWORTH Raymond W. Holdsworth

Director

March 29, 2011/s/ DOUGLAS J. MCEACHERN Douglas J. McEachern

Director

March 29, 2011


52

---



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Willdan Group, Inc.

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Willdan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Our
audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Willdan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Los
Angeles, California
March 29, 2011

F-1

---



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Willdan Group, Inc.:

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Willdan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 1, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Our
audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Willdan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of January 1, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 1, 2010, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.



March 30,
2010
Los Angeles, California

F-2

---





Table of Contents



WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
2010

January 1,
2010AssetsCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
6,642,000

$
8,445,000Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $959,000 and $1,862,000 at December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010,
respectively


14,484,000


10,097,000Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts


11,343,000


6,649,000Income tax receivable





51,000Other receivables


176,000


73,000Prepaid expenses and other current assets


1,714,000


1,500,000Total current assets


34,359,000


26,815,000Equipment and leasehold improvements, net


1,496,000


1,596,000Goodwill


12,475,000


10,371,000Other intangible assets, net


95,000


149,000Other assets


407,000


318,000Deferred income taxes, net of current portion


622,000


1,083,000Total assets

$
49,454,000

$
40,332,000Liabilities and Stockholders' EquityCurrent liabilities:Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance

$
1,223,000

$
488,000Borrowings under line of credit


1,000,000


1,000,000Accounts payable


5,380,000


1,457,000Accrued liabilities


5,985,000


4,509,000Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts


1,041,000


1,030,000Current portion of notes payable


90,000


23,000Current portion of capital lease obligations


173,000


125,000Current portion of deferred income taxes


1,407,000


1,479,000Total current liabilities


16,299,000


10,111,000Notes payable, less current portion


131,000


Capital lease obligations, less current portion


96,000


82,000Deferred lease obligations


766,000


1,022,000Total liabilities


17,292,000


11,215,000Commitments and contingenciesStockholders' equity:Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding





Common stock, $0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; 7,246,000 and 7,208,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and
January 1, 2010, respectively


72,000


72,000Additional paid-in capital


33,765,000


33,440,000Accumulated deficit


(1,675,000
)

(4,395,000
)Total stockholders' equity


32,162,000


29,117,000Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
49,454,000

$
40,332,000


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

---





Table of Contents



WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Contract revenue

$
77,896,000

$
61,605,000

$
73,190,000Direct costs of contract revenue:Salaries and wages


21,607,000


18,130,000


21,991,000Subconsultant services


16,523,000


7,997,000


7,750,000Other direct costs


3,892,000


2,715,000


2,973,000Total direct costs of contract revenue


42,022,000


28,842,000


32,714,000Gross profit


35,874,000


32,763,000


40,476,000General and administrative expenses:Salaries and wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits


17,582,000


20,325,000


24,439,000Facilities and facility related


4,290,000


4,430,000


4,803,000Stock-based compensation


235,000


272,000


214,000Depreciation and amortization


1,042,000


1,814,000


1,978,000Lease (recovery) abandonment, net


(68,000
)

707,000


742,000Impairment of goodwill





2,763,000


148,000Litigation reversal





(1,125,000
)

Other


9,719,000


11,070,000


10,952,000Total general and administrative expenses


32,800,000


40,256,000


43,276,000Income (loss) from operations


3,074,000


(7,493,000
)

(2,800,000
)Other (expense) income:Interest income


12,000


30,000


313,000Interest expense


(54,000
)

(38,000
)

(33,000
)Other, net


32,000


(5,000
)

(15,000
)Total other (expense) income, net


(10,000
)

(13,000
)

265,000Income (loss) before income taxes


3,064,000


(7,506,000
)

(2,535,000
)Income tax expense (benefit)


344,000


(1,931,000
)

(930,000
)Net income (loss)

$
2,720,000

$
(5,575,000
)
$
(1,605,000
)Earnings (loss) per share:Basic

$
0.38

$
(0.78
)
$
(0.22
)Diluted

$
0.37

$
(0.78
)
$
(0.22
)Weighted-average shares outstanding:Basic


7,233,000


7,192,000


7,159,000Diluted


7,311,000


7,192,000


7,159,000


See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

---





Table of Contents



WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Common Stock



Retained
Earnings/
(Accumulated
Deficit)Additional
Paid-in
CapitalShares

Amount

TotalBalances at December 28, 2007


7,150,000

$
71,000

$
32,796,000

$
2,785,000

$
35,652,000Shares of common stock issued in connection with employee stock purchase plan


14,000


1,000


74,000





75,000Stock-based compensation








214,000





214,000Net loss











(1,605,000
)

(1,605,000
)Balances at January 2, 2009


7,164,000


72,000


33,084,000


1,180,000


34,336,000Shares of common stock issued in connection with employee stock purchase plan


44,000





84,000





84,000Stock-based compensation








272,000





272.000Net loss











(5,575,000
)

(5,575,000
)Balances at January 1, 2010


7,208,000


72,000


33,440,000


(4,395,000
)

29,117,000Shares of common stock issued in connection with employee stock purchase plan


36,000





87,000





87,000Shares of common stock issued in connection with employee stock option exercise


2,000





3,000





3,000Stock-based compensation








235,000





235,000Net income











2,720,000


2,720,000Balances at December 31, 2010


7,246,000

$
72,000

$
33,765,000

$
(1,675,000
)
$
32,162,000


See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

---





Table of Contents



WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Cash flows from operating activities:Net income (loss)

$
2,720,000

$
(5,575,000
)
$
(1,605,000
)Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


1,053,000


1,814,000


1,978,000Deferred income taxes


389,000


(1,890,000
)

(112,000
)Goodwill impairment





2,763,000


148,000Lease (recovery) abandonment expense, net


(68,000
)

707,000


742,000(Gain) loss on sale of equipment


(17,000
)

6,000


17,000Provision for doubtful accounts


20,000


1,829,000


585,000Stock-based compensation


235,000


272,000


214,000Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


(4,407,000
)

936,000


3,266,000Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts


(4,694,000
)

1,632,000


187,000Income tax receivable


51,000


905,000


(956,000
)Other receivables


(103,000
)

(25,000
)

53,000Prepaid expenses and other current assets


(214,000
)

284,000


292,000Other assets


(89,000
)

55,000


50,000Accounts payable


3,923,000


(654,000
)

(186,000
)Accrued liabilities


1,476,000


(959,000
)

(831,000
)Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts


11,000


326,000


(236,000
)Deferred lease obligations


(189,000
)

(272,000
)

(60,000
)Net cash provided by operating activities


97,000


2,154,000


3,546,000Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements


(685,000
)

(386,000
)

(552,000
)Proceeds from sale of equipment


40,000





49,000Purchase of other assets








(75,000
)Payments related to business acquisitions


(2,104,000
)

(2,373,000
)

(10,236,000
)Purchase of liquid investments








(7,100,000
)Proceeds from sale of liquid investments








8,400,000Net cash used in investing activities


(2,749,000
)

(2,759,000
)

(9,514,000
)Cash flows from financing activities:Changes in excess of outstanding checks over bank balance


735,000


40,000


(185,000
)Payments on notes payable


(17,000
)

(46,000
)

(1,119,000
)Proceeds from notes payable


214,000





Borrowings under line of credit


14,123,000


3,553,000


Repayments of line of credit


(14,123,000
)

(2,553,000
)

Principal payments on capital leases


(173,000
)

(172,000
)

(170,000
)Proceeds from stock option exercise


3,000





Proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock purchase plan


87,000


84,000


75,000Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities


849,000


906,000


(1,399,000
)Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents


(1,803,000
)

301,000


(7,367,000
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year


8,445,000


8,144,000


15,511,000Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year

$
6,642,000

$
8,445,000

$
8,144,000Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:Cash paid during the period for:Interest

$
52,000

$
40,000

$
34,000Income taxes


48,000


3,000


853,000Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities:Equipment acquired under capital leases

$
240,000

$
60,000

$
42,000Note payable issued in connection with acquisition of assets








100,000Purchase price payable








1,000,000


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-6

---





Table of Contents



WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS        Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

1. ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY



Willdan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries ("Willdan Group" or the "Company") is a provider of professional technical and consulting
services to small and mid-sized public agencies, large public utilities and, to a lesser extent, private industry in California, New York, Arizona and to a lesser extent, other states
throughout the United States. The Company enables these public agencies to provide a wide range of specialized services without having to incur and maintain the overhead necessary to develop staffing
in-house. The Company provides a broad range of services including civil engineering and planning, energy efficiency and sustainability, economic and financial consulting, homeland
security and communications and technology. Clients primarily consist of cities, counties, public utilities, redevelopment agencies, water districts, school districts and universities, state agencies,
federal agencies, a variety of other special districts and agencies, private industry and tribal governments.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES



The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Willdan Group, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Willdan
Engineering, Willdan Energy Solutions, Public Agency Resources, Willdan Financial Services and Willdan Homeland Solutions. Willdan Energy Solutions is included as of June 9, 2008, the date of
its acquisition. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.



The Company operates and reports financial results on a fiscal year of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to
December 31. Fiscal years 2010 and 2009 contained 52 weeks. Fiscal year 2008 contained 53 weeks. All references to years in the notes to consolidated financial statements
represent fiscal years.



All highly liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
Outstanding checks in excess of cash on deposit have been classified as current liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following:

December 31,
2010

January 1,
2010Wells Fargo Stage CoachSweep Investment Account

$
808,000

$
609,000Wells FargoMoney Market Mutual Fund


5,287,000


5,280,000Wells FargoAdvantage Heritage Fund


47,000


1,097,000Cash on hand in business checking accounts


500,000


1,459,000$
6,642,000

$
8,445,000


F-7

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The
Company from time to time may be exposed to credit risk with its bank deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limits and with uninsured money market investments. The Company has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.



As of December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the carrying amounts of the Company's cash, cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, income tax receivable, other receivables, prepaid expenses and other current assets, excess of outstanding
checks over bank balance, accounts payable, purchase price payable, accrued liabilities and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, approximate their fair values
because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization or payment. The carrying amounts of debt obligations approximate their fair
values since the terms are comparable to terms currently offered by local lending institutions for loans of similar terms to companies with comparable credit risk.



Willdan Group, Inc. (WGI) is a holding company with five wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company presents segment information
externally consistent with the manner in which the Company's chief operating decision maker reviews information to assess performance and allocate resources. WGI performs administrative functions on
behalf of its subsidiaries, such as treasury, legal, accounting, information systems, human resources and certain business development activities, and earns revenue that is only incidental to the
activities of the enterprise. As a result, WGI does not meet the definition of an operating segment. Three of the five WGI subsidiaries are aggregated into one reportable segment as they have similar
economic characteristics including the nature of services, the methods used to provide services and the type of customers. The remaining two subsidiaries each comprise separate reporting segments.



Other than lease commitments, legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of business, and employment contracts, the Company does
not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities. In addition, the Company's policy is not to enter into derivative instruments, futures or forward contracts. Finally,
the Company does not have any majority-owned subsidiaries or any interests in, or relationships with, any special-purpose entities that are not included in the consolidated financial statements.



The Company enters into contracts with its clients that contain three principal types of pricing provisions: fixed price,
time-and-materials, and unit-based. Revenue on fixed price contracts is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based generally on
the ratio of direct costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization costs) incurred to date to estimated total direct costs at completion. Revenue on time-and-materials and
unit-based contracts is recognized as the work is

F-8

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

performed
in accordance with the specific terms of the contract. Revenue for amounts that have been billed but not earned is deferred and such deferred revenue is referred to as billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Adjustments
to contract cost estimates are made in the periods in which the facts requiring such revisions become known. When the revised estimate indicates a loss, such loss is provided
for currently in its entirety. Claims revenue is recognized only upon resolution of the claim. Change orders in dispute are evaluated as claims. Costs related to un-priced change orders
are expensed when incurred and recognition of the related contract revenue is based on an evaluation of the probability of recovery of the costs. Estimated profit is recognized for
un-priced change orders if realization of the expected price of the change order is probable.

Applying
the percentage-of-completion method of recognizing revenue requires the Company to estimate the outcome of its long-term contracts. The
Company forecasts such outcomes to the best of its knowledge and belief of current and expected conditions and its expected course of action. Differences between the Company's estimates and actual
results often occur resulting in changes to reported revenue and earnings. Such changes could have a material effect on future consolidated financial statements.

Direct
costs of contract revenue consist primarily of that portion of technical and nontechnical salaries and wages that has been incurred in connection with revenue producing projects.
Direct costs of contract revenue also include production expenses, sub-consultant services and other expenses that are incurred in connection with revenue producing projects.

Direct
costs of contract revenue exclude that portion of technical and nontechnical salaries and wages related to marketing efforts, vacations, holidays and other time not spent directly
generating revenue under existing contracts. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses. Additionally, payroll taxes, bonuses and employee benefit costs for all Company personnel
are included in general
and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations since no allocation of these costs is made to direct costs of contract revenue. No allocation of facilities costs
is made to direct costs of contract revenue. Other companies may classify as direct costs of contract revenue some of the costs that the Company classifies as general and administrative costs. The
Company expenses direct costs of contract revenue when incurred.

Accounts
receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based upon a review of all outstanding amounts on a quarterly basis. Management
determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. Credit risk is generally minimal with governmental
entities, but disputes may arise related to these receivable amounts. Accounts receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivables previously written off are
recorded when received.

The
value of retainage is included in accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Retainage represents the billed amount that is retained by the customer,
in accordance with the terms of the contract, generally until performance is substantially complete.

F-9

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



All of the Company's office leases are classified as operating leases and rent expense is included in facilities expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Some of the lease terms include rent concessions and rent escalation clauses, all of which are taken into account in computing minimum lease
payments. Minimum lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. The excess of rent expense recognized over the amounts contractually due pursuant to
the underlying leases is reflected as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The cost of improvements that the Company makes to the leased office space is capitalized as
leasehold improvements. The Company is subject to non-cancellable leases for offices or portions of offices for which use has been ceased. For each of these abandoned leases, the present
value of the future lease payments, net of estimated sublease payments, along with any unamortized tenant improvement costs, are recognized as lease abandonment expense in the Company's consolidated
statements of operations with a corresponding liability in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.



Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment under capital leases
is stated at the present value of the minimum lease payments as of the acquisition date. Depreciation and amortization on equipment are calculated using the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives of two to five years. Leasehold improvements and assets under capital leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of estimated useful lives
or the term of the related lease.

Following
are the estimated useful lives used to calculate depreciation and amortization:

Category

Estimated
Useful LifeFurniture and fixtures


5 yearsComputer hardware


2 yearsComputer software


3 yearsAutomobiles and trucks


3 yearsField equipment


5 years


Equipment
and leasehold improvements are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the
carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.



Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of the assets acquired. Goodwill, which has an indefinite useful life, is not
amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Impairment losses for

F-10

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

reporting
units are recognized to the extent that a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value.



The Company records liabilities to claimants for probable and estimable claims on its consolidated balance sheet, which is included in
accrued liabilities, and records a corresponding receivable from the insurance company for the portion of the claim that is probable of being covered by insurance, which is included in other
receivables. The estimated claim amount net of the amount estimated to be recoverable from the insurance company is included in general and administrative expense.



The Company accounts for stock options under the fair value recognition provisions of the accounting standard entitled
"CompensationStock Compensation." This standard requires the measurement of compensation cost at the grant date, based upon the estimated
fair value of the award, and requires amortization of the related expense over the employee's requisite service period.



Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets may not be
realized.

The
Company recognizes the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions if it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities, based on
the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.



In accordance with industry practice, amounts realizable and payable under contracts, which may extend beyond one year, are included in
current assets and liabilities.



The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-11

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a standard entitled"The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,a replacement of FASB No. 162."This standard establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification"), as the single source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting standards applicable for all
non-government entities, with the exception of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and interpretative releases. The Codification, which changes the referencing of financial
standards, is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after September 15, 2009. As the Codification is not intended to change or alter existing U.S. GAAP, the adoption
of the standard did not have any effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
April 2008, the FASB issued a standard entitled"Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets."This standard amends the
factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under the standard for goodwill and other intangible assets. The new standard was effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the standard on January 3, 2009 and this had no effect on its financial statements.

3. BUSINESS COMBINATION

On June 9, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Willdan Energy Solutions, formerly known as Intergy Corporation, a Californiabased consulting
company that assists companies, institutions and agencies with planning and implementing their energy efficiency, water conservation and renewable energy strategies. The acquisition cost recorded by
the Company as of December 31, 2010 was $15.2 million, consisting of $9.9 million in cash paid at closing, a $0.2 million net asset value adjustment, a guaranteed payment
of $1.0 million in cash paid in June 2009, an earn-out payment of $1.3 million paid in August 2009, an earn-out payment of $2.1 million paid in September
2010 and $0.7 million in transaction costs. The acquisition cost may increase by up to $2.8 million if Willdan Energy Solutions achieves certain financial targets over the annual periods
ending on the last day of the Company's second fiscal quarter in 2011. The Company has recorded $12.5 million of goodwill associated with the acquisition through December 31, 2010.

The
$12.5 million of goodwill represents the amount paid to acquire Willdan Energy Solutions over and above the fair value of the net assets acquired, which includes the estimated
fair value of the backlog in place as of the date of acquisition. The amount paid that has been classified as goodwill primarily relates to the expected future business that was not part of the
backlog at the time of acquisition. The goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes over a period of 15 years.

F-12

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

3. BUSINESS COMBINATION (Continued)

Unaudited
pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2009 as though Willdan Energy Solutions had been acquired as of the first day of the
period presented is as follows:

Fiscal Year2008Contract revenue

$
77,831,000Loss from operations


(919,000
)Net loss


(1,053,000
)Basic and diluted loss per share

$
(0.15
)


The
Company finalized its purchase price allocation during fiscal year 2009.

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reporting unit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were as follows:

Fiscal Year 2010Balance at
Beginning of Year

Goodwill
Additions

Impairment

Balance at
End of YearReporting Unit:Energy Solutions

$
10,371,000

$
2,104,000

$


$
12,475,000Financial Services











Homeland Security Services











$
10,371,000

$
2,104,000

$


$
12,475,000




Fiscal Year 2009Balance at
Beginning of Year

Goodwill
Additions

Impairment

Balance at
End of YearReporting Unit:Energy Solutions

$
8,382,000

$
1,989,000

$


$
10,371,000Financial Services


2,763,000





(2,763,000
)

Homeland Security Services











$
11,145,000

$
1,989,000

$
(2,763 ,000
)
$
10,371,000


F-13

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)



Fiscal Year 2008Balance at
Beginning of Year

Goodwill
Additions

Impairment

Balance at
End of YearReporting Unit:Energy Solutions

$


$
8,382,000

$


$
8,382,000Financial Services


2,763,000








2,763,000Homeland Security Services


148,000





(148,000
)

$
2,911,000

$
8,382,000

$
(148,000
)
$
11,145,000


In
fiscal 2008, the fair value of the Homeland Security Services reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value and an impairment charge of $148,000 was recognized. The additions to
goodwill during fiscal 2009 for Energy Solutions related to the $1.3 million earn-out payment and finalization of the purchase price allocation. In fiscal 2009, the fair value of
the Financial Services reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value and step two of the impairment analysis indicated that there was no implied value to this reporting unit's goodwill.
Accordingly, an impairment charge of
$2.8 million was recognized. The fair value of the reporting unit is a Level 3 valuation. The valuation was based on an 80% weighting of an income approach value and a 20% weighting
using a market approach value. The income approach was based on the present value of projected cash flows during the holding period and disposition of the reporting unit at the end of the final year
of the assumed holding period. The market approach was based on a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) utilizing publicly available EBITDA multiples for
similar companies. The terminal sales value computed in the income approach was also based on a multiple of projected EBITDA for the last year of the assumed holding period. The additions to goodwill
in fiscal 2010 for Energy Solutions related to the $2.1 million earn-out payment in September 2010.

F-14

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

The
goodwill balances included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consist of the following:

Reporting UnitsEnergy Solutions

Financial Services

Homeland
Security Services

TotalDecember 31, 2010:Goodwill

$
12,475,000

$
2,763,000

$
148,000

$
15,386,000Accumulated impairment





(2,763,000
)

(148,000
)

(2,911,000
)$
12,475,000

$


$


$
12,475,000January 1, 2010:Goodwill

$
10,371,000

$
2,763,000

$
148,000

$
13,282,000Accumulated impairment





(2,763,000
)

(148,000
)

(2,911,000
)$
10,371,000

$


$


$
10,371,000January 2, 2009:Goodwill

$
8,382,000

$
2,763,000

$
148,000

$
11,293,000Accumulated impairment








(148,000
)

(148,000
)$
8,382,000

$
2,763,000

$


$
11,145,000


The
gross amounts and accumulated amortization of the Company's acquired identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives as of December 31, 2010 and January 1,
2010, included in intangible assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, were as follows:

December 31, 2010

January 1, 2010Gross
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Amortization
Period (yrs)Backlog

$
920,000

$
920,000

$
920,000

$
920,000


1Training materials/courses


282,000


187,000


282,000


134,000


5Non-compete agreements


30,000


30,000


30,000


29,000


3$
1,232,000

$
1,137,000

$
1,232,000

$
1,083,000


At
the time of acquisition, the Company estimates the fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets based upon the facts and circumstances related to the particular
intangible asset. Inherent in such estimates are judgments and estimates of future revenue, profitability, cash flows and appropriate discount rates for any present value calculations. The Company
preliminarily estimates the value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets and then finalizes the estimated fair values during the purchase allocation period, which does not extend beyond
12 months from the date of acquisition. The purchase allocation for Willdan Energy Solutions was finalized during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

F-15

---





Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

For the years ended December 31, 2010, January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, the Company's amortization expense for acquired identifiable intangible assets with
finite useful lives was $54,000, $602,000 and $429,000, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense for acquired identifiable intangible assets is as follows:

Fiscal year:2011

$
46,0002012


37,0002013


12,000$
95,000


5. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common
shares for the period. Potential common shares include the weighted-average dilutive effects of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method.

The
following table sets forth the number of weighted-average shares used to compute basic and diluted EPS:

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Net income (loss)

$
2,720,000

$
(5,575,000
)
$
(1,605,000
)Weighted-average common shares outstanding


7,233,000


7,192,000


7,159,000Effect of dilutive stock options


78,000





Weighted-average common stock outstandingdiluted


7,311,000


7,192,000


7,159,000Earnings (loss) per share:Basic

$
0.38

$
(0.78
)
$
(0.22
)Diluted

$
0.37

$
(0.78
)
$
(0.22
)


For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, 524,000 options were excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares, compared to 566,000 and 303,000 options, for
fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. These options were not included in the computation of dilutive potential common shares because the assumed proceeds per share exceeded the average market
price per share for the periods. Accordingly, the inclusion of these options would have been anti-dilutive. For periods in which the Company incurs net losses, dilutive potential common
shares are excluded as they would be anti-dilutive.

F-16

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

6. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable consisted of the following:

December 31,
2010

January 1,
2010Billed

$
14,895,000

$
11,895,000Unbilled


11,343,000


6,649,000Contract retentions


548,000


64,00026,786,000


18,608,000Allowance for doubtful accounts


(959,000
)

(1,862,000
)$
25,827,000

$
16,746,000


The
movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts consisted of the following for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008:

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Balance as of the beginning of the year

$
1,862,000

$
662,000

$
372,000Provision for doubtful accounts


149,000


1,749,000


589,000Write-offs of uncollectible accounts


(1,059,000
)

(555,000
)

(300,000
)Recoveries of accounts written off


7,000


6,000


1,000Balance as of the end of the year

$
959,000

$
1,862,000

$
662,000


Billed
accounts receivable represent amounts billed to clients that have yet to be collected. Unbilled accounts receivable represent revenue recognized but not yet billed pursuant to
contract terms or accounts billed after the period end. Substantially all unbilled receivables as of December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010 are expected to be billed and collected within
twelve months of such date. Contract retentions represent amounts invoiced to clients where payments have been withheld pending the completion of certain milestones, other contractual conditions or
upon the completion of the project. These retention agreements vary from project to project and could be outstanding for several months.

Allowances
for doubtful accounts have been determined through specific identification of amounts considered to be uncollectible and potential write-offs, plus a
non-specific allowance for other amounts for which some potential loss has been determined to be probable based on current and past experience.

As
of December 31, 2010, one client accounted for 34% of outstanding receivables. No client accounted for more than 10% of the Company's outstanding receivables as of
January 1, 2010.

F-17

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

7. EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

Equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following:

December 31,
2010

January 1,
2010Furniture and fixtures

$
4,371,000

$
4,452,000Computer hardware and software


5,227,000


4,903,000Leasehold improvements


803,000


748,000Equipment under capital leases


881,000


719,000Automobiles, trucks, and field equipment


529,000


424,00011,811,000


11,246,000Accumulated depreciation and amortization


(10,315,000
)

(9,650,000
)Equipment and leasehold improvements, net

$
1,496,000

$
1,596,000


Included
in accumulated depreciation and amortization is $151,000 and $156,000 of amortization related to equipment held under capital leases in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.

8. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

December 31,
2010

January 1,
2010Accrued bonuses

$
107,000

$
169,000Paid leave bank


1,318,000


1,155,000Compensation and payroll taxes


684,000


581,000Accrued legal


46,000


136,000Accrued workers' compensation insurance


49,000


27,000Accrued rent


420,000


563,000Employee withholdings


179,000


171,000Client deposits


157,000


469,000Other


3,025,000


1,238,000Total accrued liabilities

$
5,985,000

$
4,509,000


9. EQUITY PLANS

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had two share-based compensation plans, which are described below. The Company may no longer grant awards under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
The compensation expense that has been recognized for stock options issued under these plans was $235,000, $272,000 and $214,000 for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F-18

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

9. EQUITY PLANS (Continued)

2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

In June 2006, the Company's board of directors adopted the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan ("2006 Plan") and it received stockholder
approval. The Company re-submitted the 2006 Plan to its stockholders for post-IPO approval at the 2007 annual meeting of the stockholders and it was approved. The 2006 Plan
will terminate ten years after the board of directors approved it and no additional awards were or will be granted under the 2006 Plan after the Company's shareholders approved the 2008 Plan (as
defined below) in June
2008. The 2006 Plan had 300,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance to the Company's directors, executives, officers, employees, consultants and advisors. As of June 4, 2010,
approximately 52,333 shares were available for award grant purposes under the 2006 Plan. These shares became available for grant under the 2008 Plan following shareholder approval of the 2008 Plan.
Options granted under the 2006 Plan could be "non-statutory stock options" which expire no more than ten years from the date of grant or "incentive stock options" as defined in
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Upon exercise of non-statutory stock options, the Company is generally entitled to a tax deduction on the exercise of
the option for an amount equal to the excess over the exercise price of the fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise. The Company is generally not entitled to any tax deduction on the
exercise of an incentive stock option. Option awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2006 Plan). Through December 31, 2010, options granted,
net of forfeitures and expirations, under the 2006 Plan consisted of 192,500 shares and 19,000 shares for incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options, respectively, and 211,500
shares of common stock remained reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan.

2008 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

In March 2008, the Company's board of directors adopted the 2008 Performance Incentive Plan ("2008 Plan"), and it received stockholder
approval at the 2008 annual meeting of the stockholders in June 2008. The 2008 Plan will terminate ten years after the board of directors approved it. The 2008 Plan had 486,167 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance to the Company's directors, executives, officers, employees, consultants and advisors until June 4, 2010, at which time the stockholders, at the annual meeting of the
stockholders, approved a 350,000 share increase to the 2008 Plan. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the 2008 Plan
can also be increased by any shares subject to stock options granted under the 2006 Plan and outstanding as of June 9, 2008 which expire, or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, after
June 9, 2008 without being exercised. As of December 31, 2010, the 2008 Plan had 888,500 shares of common stock reserved for issuance. Awards authorized by the 2008 Plan include stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock bonuses, stock units, performance stock, and other share-based awards. No participant may be granted an option to purchase more than 100,000
shares in any fiscal year. Options generally may not be granted with exercise prices less than fair market value at the date of grant, with vesting provisions and contractual terms determined by the
compensation committee of the board of directors on a grant-by-grant basis. Options granted under the 2008 Plan may be "nonqualified stock options" or "incentive stock options"
as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The maximum term of each option shall be 10 years. Upon exercise of nonqualified stock options, the Company is
generally entitled to a tax deduction on the exercise of the option for an amount equal to the excess over the exercise price of

F-19

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

9. EQUITY PLANS (Continued)

the
fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise. The Company is generally not entitled to any tax deduction on the exercise of an incentive stock option. Option awards provide for
accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2008 Plan). Through December 31, 2010,
options granted, net of forfeitures and exercises, under the 2008 Plan consisted of 556,134 shares and 92,000 shares for incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options,
respectively.

The
fair value of each option is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based upon
historical volatility of "guideline companies" since the length of time the Company's shares have been publicly traded is shorter than the expected or contractual term of the options. The expected
term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees' expected exercise and expected post-vesting termination behavior is estimated
based upon the simplified method. Under this approach, the expected term is presumed to be the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The assumptions are as follows:

2010

2009

2008Expected volatility

39%

39% - 40%

35% - 39%Expected dividends

0%

0%

0%Expected term (in years)

5.75 - 6.00

5.75 - 6.00

5.00 - 6.00Risk-free rate

1.48% - 2.59%

2.20% - 2.95%

1.50% - 3.61%


A
summary of option activity under the 2006 Plan and 2008 Plan as of December 31, 2010 and changes during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, January 1, 2010
and January 2, 2009 is presented below. The intrinsic value of the fully-vested options is $231,000, based on the Company's closing stock price of $4.00 on December 31, 2010.

Options

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)Outstanding at January 1, 2010


566,000

$
4.54


8.6Granted


295,000


2.67


9.6Exercised


(2,000
)

1.65


8.6Forfeited or expired








Outstanding at December 31, 2010


859,000

$
3.90


8.3Vested at December 31, 2010


356,000

$
6.07


7.2Exercisable at December 31, 2010


356,000

$
6.07


7.2


F-20

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

9. EQUITY PLANS (Continued)



Options

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)Outstanding at January 2, 2009


303,000

$
7.23


8.8Granted


291,000


1.80


9.4Exercised








Forfeited or expired


(28,000
)

5.47


Outstanding at January 1, 2010


566,000

$
4.54


8.6Vested at January 1, 2010


172,000

$
8.01


7.7Exercisable at January 1, 2010


172,000

$
8.01


7.7




Options

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)Outstanding at December 28, 2007


233,000

$
9.50


8.6Granted


119,000


3.81


9.6Exercised








Forfeited or expired


(49,000
)

9.72


Outstanding at January 2 , 2009


303,000

$
7.23


8.8Vested at January 2, 2009


85,000

$
8.85


8.5Exercisable at January 2, 2009


85,000

$
8.85


8.5


A
summary of the status of the Company's nonvested options and changes in nonvested options during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, January 1, 2010 and
January 2, 2009, is presented below:

Options

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNonvested at January 1, 2010


394,000

$
1.24Granted


295,000


1.06Vested


(186,000
)

1.72Forfeited





Nonvested at December 31, 2010


503,000


0.96


F-21

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

9. EQUITY PLANS (Continued)



Options

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNonvested at January 2, 2009


218,000

$
2.64Granted


291,000


0.78Vested


(96,000
)

2.87Forfeited


(19,000
)

1.88Nonvested at January 1, 2010


394,000


1.24




Options

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNonvested at December 28, 2007


200,000

$
3.76Granted


119,000


1.47Vested


(74,000
)

3.39Forfeited


(27,000
)

3.76Nonvested at January 2, 2009


218,000


2.64


As
of December 31, 2010, there was $378,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options. That expense is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years. The total fair value of vested options granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, January 1, 2010, and January 2,
2009 was $0, $0 and $29,000, respectively.

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Company adopted its Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to allow eligible employees the right to purchase shares
of common stock, at semi-annual intervals, with their accumulated payroll deductions. The plan received stockholder approval in June 2006. The Company re-submitted the plan to
its stockholders for post-IPO approval at the 2007 annual stockholders' meeting where approval was obtained. A total of 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock have been reserved for
issuance under the plan, with no more than 100,000 shares being issuable in any one calendar year.

The
plan has semi-annual periods beginning on each January 1 and ending on each June 30 and beginning on each July 1 and ending on each
December 31. The first offering period commenced on February 10, 2007 and ended on June 30, 2007.

Participants
make contributions under the plan only by means of payroll deductions each payroll period. The accumulated contributions are applied to the purchase of shares. Shares are
purchased under the plan on or as soon as practicable after, the last day of the offering period. The purchase price per share equals 95% of the fair market value of a share on the last day of such
offering period.

F-22

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

9. EQUITY PLANS (Continued)

The Company's Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is a non-compensatory plan. As a result, stock-based compensation expense is not recognized in relation
to this plan. As of December 31, 2010, there were 203,511 shares available for issuance under the plan.

10. DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Debt obligations, excluding obligations under capital leases (note 10), consist of the following:

2010

2009Outstanding borrowings on line of credit

$
1,000,000

$
1,000,000Notes payable for vehicles, 36 month term, bearing interest at 1.9%, payable in monthly principal and interest installments of $5,300 through
January 2014, secured by vehicles


187,000


Other


34,000


23,000$
1,221,000

$
1,023,000Less current portion


1,090,000


1,023,000Debt obligations, less current portion

$
131,000

$



Under
the terms of the Company's credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"), the Company can borrow up to $5.0 million from time to time (as may
be limited by the covenants in the credit agreement as discussed below) up to and until January 1, 2012. Loans made under the revolving line of credit will accrue interest at either
(i) the floating rate equal to the prime rate in effect from time to time or (ii) the fixed rate of 1.75% above LIBOR, at the Company's election. For prime rate loans, the interest rate
will be adjusted when each prime rate change by the bank is announced and becomes effective.

Borrowings
under the credit agreement are secured by all of the Company's accounts receivable and other rights to payment, general intangibles, inventory and equipment, including those
of the Company's subsidiaries. In addition, borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by investments held in a securities account at Wells Fargo that must at all times have a collateral value
of at least $5.0 million. Each of the Company's subsidiaries (except Public Agency Resources) has signed an unconditional guaranty of the Company's obligations under the agreements.

The
credit agreement contains customary representations and affirmative covenants, including a covenant to maintain a tangible net worth of at least $18.0 million at all times.
Tangible net worth is defined in the credit agreement as stockholders' equity less intangible assets and loans or advances to, or investments in, any related entities or individuals. The impact of any
non-cash property lease termination expense of up to $1.0 million in the aggregate recorded during the period from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 was
excluded from the calculation of tangible net worth under the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2010, the Company's tangible net worth as defined under the Company's credit agreement was
met.

The
credit agreement also includes customary negative covenants, including a covenant that prohibits the incurrence of additional indebtedness by the Company or the Company's
subsidiaries

F-23

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

10. DEBT OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

other
than purchase money indebtedness not to exceed $2.0 million and indebtedness existing on the date of the credit agreement, and a covenant that prohibits payment of dividends on the
Company's stock and redemptions, repurchases or other acquisitions of the Company's stock, provided that the Company can repurchase stock with an aggregate fair market value up to $5.0 million
in any calendar year. In addition, the credit agreement includes customary events of default for a credit facility. Upon a default, the interest rate will be increased by a default rate margin of
4.0%. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the credit agreement, including a breach of any of the covenants discussed above, Wells Fargo has the option to make any loans then outstanding
under the credit agreement immediately due and payable and is no longer obligated to extend further credit to the Company under the credit agreement.

Principal
maturities on notes payable as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:

Fiscal year:2011

$
90,0002012


62,0002013


63,0002014


6,000$
221,000


11. COMMITMENTS



The Company is obligated under capital leases for certain furniture and office equipment that expire at various dates through the year
2013.

The
Company also leases certain office facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through the year 2015 and is committed under
non-cancelable operating leases for the lease of computer equipment and automobiles through the year 2012.

F-24

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

11. COMMITMENTS (Continued)

Future
minimum rental payments under capital and non-cancelable operating leases are summarized as follows:

Capital

OperatingFiscal year:2011

$
207,000

$
3,535,0002012


101,000


2,606,0002013


21,000


1,943,0002014





1,583,0002015





580,000Total future minimum lease payments


329,000

$
10,247,000Amount representing maintenance


(50,000
)Amount representing interest (at rates ranging 2.95% to 11.0%)


(10,000
)Present value of net minimum lease payments under capital leases


269,000Less current portion


173,000$
96,000


As
of September 1, 2010, the Company turned over to the landlord a portion of its headquarters office space that was subleased by an entity that is owned by one of the Company's
directors. Pursuant to the sublease agreement, this tenant paid the Company monthly rent of approximately $8,500, for a total of approximately $72,000 through August 31, 2010. The tenant had
also paid the Company a proportionate share of certain operating expenses and taxes relating to the subleased space.

Rent
expense and related charges for common area maintenance for all facility operating leases for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $3,116,000, $3,306,000 and
$3,544,000, respectively.

During
the fiscal years ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, the Company closed certain of its offices or separable sections of offices. Additionally, a tenant that
was subleasing an office from the Company defaulted on its lease. As a result of the office closures and the sublease default, the Company recorded lease abandonment expense, net, of $707,000 and
$742,000, which is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal years ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, respectively. This expense includes
future rental obligations and other costs associated

F-25

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

11. COMMITMENTS (Continued)

with
the leased space net of the fair value of subleases. The following is a reconciliation of the liability for lease abandonment (recovery) expense for fiscal years 2010 and 2009:

Fiscal 2010

Fiscal 2009Liability for abandoned leases as of beginning of year

$
1,048,000

$
757,000Lease abandonment (recovery) expense, net


(68,000
)

707,000Lease payments on abandoned leases, net of sublease payments


(439,000
)

(462,000
)Other


137,000


46,000Liability for abandoned leases as of the end of the year

$
678,000

$
1,048,000


The
current portion of the liability for abandoned leases is included in accrued liabilities and the non-current portion is included in deferred lease obligations in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.



The Company has a qualified profit sharing plan (the Plan) pursuant to Code Section 401(a) and qualified cash or deferred
arrangement pursuant to Code Section 401(k) covering substantially all employees. Employees may elect to contribute up to 50% of compensation limited to the amount allowed by tax laws. Company
contributions are made solely at the discretion of the Company's board of directors. The Company made matching contributions of approximately $157,000, $0 and $260,000 during fiscal years 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively.

The
Company has a discretionary bonus plan for regional managers, division managers and others as determined by the Company president. Bonuses are awarded if certain financial goals are
achieved. The financial goals are not stated in the plan; rather they are judgmentally determined each year. In addition, the board of directors may declare discretionary bonuses to key employees and
all employees are eligible for what the Company refers to as the "hot hand" bonus program, which pays awards for outstanding performance. Bonus expense for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled
approximately $403,000, $421,000 and $316,000, respectively, of which approximately $107,000, and $169,000 is included in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010,
respectively.



In May 2006, the Company's board of directors approved providing lifetime health insurance coverage for Win Westfall, the Company's
former chief executive officer and current chairman of the board of directors, and his spouse and for Linda Heil, the widow of the Company's former chief executive officer, Dan Heil. Mrs. Heil
is also a member of the Company's board of directors. Additionally, the board approved health insurance coverage for Mrs. Heil's two dependents until they reach the maximum age for dependent
coverage under the Company's health insurance policy. These benefits relate to past services provided to the Company. Accordingly, there is no unamortized compensation cost for the benefits.

F-26

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

11. COMMITMENTS (Continued)

Included
in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets related to this obligation is the present value of expected payments for health insurance coverage,
$170,000 as of December 31, 2010 and $189,000 as of January 1, 2010.

12. INCOME TAXES

The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of:

Fiscal Year2010

2009

2008Current federal (benefit) taxes

$
(80,000
)
$


$
(827,000
)Current state taxes


32,000


10,000


9,000Deferred federal taxes (benefit)


94,000


(1,564,000
)

77,000Deferred state taxes (benefit)


298,000


(377,000
)

(189,000
)$
344,000

$
(1,931,000
)
$
(930,000
)


The
provision (benefit) for income taxes reconciles to the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate of 34% to our income (loss) before income taxes. The sources and
tax effects of the differences for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

2010

2009

2008Computed "expected" federal income tax expense (benefit)

$
1,042,000

$
(2,552,000
)
$
(862,000
)Permanent differences


107,000


121,000


74,000Current and deferred state income tax expense (benefit), net of federal benefit


217,000


(413,000
)

(119,000
)Change in valuation allowances on deferred tax assets


(934,000
)

934,000


Other


(88,000
)

(21,000
)

(23,000
)$
344,000

$
(1,931,000
)
$
(930,000
)


F-27

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

12. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

December 31,
2010

January 1,
2010

January 2,
2009Current deferred tax assets:Accrued litigation judgment

$
18,000

$
54,000

$
65,000Accounts receivable allowance


382,000


741,000


250,000Other accrued liabilities


794,000


786,000


520,000Federal and state net operating losses


1,937,000





3,131,000


1,581,000


835,000Valuation allowance





(412,000
)

Net deferred tax assets


3,131,000


1,169,000


835,000Current deferred tax liabilities:Deferred revenue


(4,491,000
)

(2,623,000
)

(3,306,000
)Other


(47,000
)

(25,000
)

(48,000
)(4,538,000
)

(2,648,000
)

(3,354,000
)Net current deferred tax liability

$
(1,407,000
)
$
(1,479,000
)
$
(2,519,000
)Deferred tax assets, net of current portion:Federal and state net operating losses

$
455,000

$
914,000

$
628,000Equipment and leasehold improvement depreciation


42,000


191,000


165,000Intangible assets


33,000


803,000


Other


121,000


93,000


27,000651,000


2,001,000


820,000Valuation allowance





(522,000
)

Net deferred tax assets


651,000


1,479,000


820,000Deferred tax liabilities, net of current portion:Goodwill amortization


(29,000
)

(396,000
)

(587,000
)Net deferred tax assets, net of current portion

$
622,000

$
1,083,000

$
233,000


At
December 31, 2010, the Company had federal and state operating loss carryovers of $5.7 million and $7.8 million, respectively. These carryovers expire through
2031 and 2032 for federal and state income taxes, respectively.

Management
also believes that there are no material uncertain tax positions that would impact the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company's policy is to recognize
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company may be subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for calendar years 2007 through 2010. The
Company may also be subject to examination on certain state and local jurisdictions for the years 2006 through 2010.

F-28

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has three reporting segments: Engineering Services, Public Finance Services and Homeland Security Services. The Engineering Services segment includes Willdan Engineering,
Public Agency Resources and Willdan Energy Solutions. The Engineering Services segment performs services for a broad range of public agency clients and, to a lesser extent, private industry, and
offers a full complement of civil engineering and municipal planning, energy efficiency and sustainability services to clients throughout the western United States. The Public Finance Services
segment, which consists of Willdan Financial Services, provides expertise and support for the various financing techniques employed by public agencies to finance their operations and infrastructure
along with the mandated reporting and other requirements associated with these financings. The Homeland Security Services segment, which consists of Willdan Homeland Solutions, provides homeland
security and communications and technology consulting services to cities, counties and related municipal service agencies.

The
accounting policies applied to determine the segment information are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There were no intersegment sales
for any of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. Management evaluates the performance of each segment based upon income or loss from operations before
income taxes. Certain segment asset information including expenditures for long-lived assets has not been presented as it is not reported to or reviewed by the chief operating decision
maker. In addition, enterprise-wide service line contract revenue is not included as it is impracticable to report this information for each group of similar services.

F-29

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Financial
information with respect to the reportable segments and reconciliation to the amounts reported in the Company's consolidated financial statements follows:

Engineering
Services

Public Finance
Services

Homeland Security
Services

Unallocated
Corporate(1)(2)

Intersegment

Consolidated
TotalFiscal Year 2010:Contract revenue

$
62,223,000

$
10,364,000

$
5,309,000

$


$


$
77,896,000Depreciation and amortization


776,000


152,000


114,000








1,042,000Interest expense (income)


77,000


(20,000
)

(3,000
)







54,000Segment profit (loss) before income tax expense


2,127,000


698,000


360,000


(121,000
)




3,064,000Income tax expense (benefit)


173,000


120,000


58,000


(7,000
)




344,000Net income (loss)


1,954,000


578,000


302,000


(114,000
)(1)




2,720,000Segment assets


163,013,000


23,297,000


6,700,000


143,650,000
(2)

(287,206,000
)

49,454,000Fiscal Year 2009:Contract revenue


46,287,000


11,792,000


3,526,000








61,605,000Depreciation and amortization


1,491,000


219,000


104,000








1,814,000Interest expense


25,000


6,000


7,000








38,000Segment (loss) profit before income tax expense


(5,661,000
)

(1,747,000
)

(13,000
)

(85,000
)




(7,506,000
)Income tax (benefit) expense


(1,469,000
)

(442,000
)

3,000


(23,000
)




(1,931,000
)Net loss


(4,192,000
)

(1,305,000
)

(16,000
)

(62,000
)(1)




(5,575,000
)Segment assets


137,673,000


23,151,000


6,250,000


140,987,000
(2)

(267,729,000
)

40,332.000Fiscal Year 2008:Contract revenue


57,324,000


13,660,000


2,206,000








73,190,000Depreciation and amortization


1,639,000


252,000


87,000








1,978,000Interest expense (income)


18,000


(8,000
)

23,000








33,000Segment (loss) profit before income tax expense


(3,580,000
)

2,101,000


(955,000
)

(101,000
)




(2,535,000
)Income tax (benefit) expense


(1,377,000
)

863,000


(376,000
)

(40,000
)




(930,000
)Net (loss) income


(2,203,000
)

1,238,000


(579,000
)

(61,000
)(1)




(1,605,000
)Segment assets


82,062,000


14,396,000


2,657,000


74,470,000
(2)

(126,015,000
)

47,570,000


(1)The
following sets forth the amounts included in the net income (loss) that was Unallocated Corporate for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008:


2010

2009

2008Unallocated net (loss) income:Income tax benefit

$
7,000

$
23,000

$
40,000Other


(121,000
)

(85,000
)

(101,000
)$
(114,000
)
$
(62,000
)
$
(61 ,000
)


(2)The
following sets forth the assets that are included in Unallocated Corporate as of December 31, 2010, January 1, 2010 and January 2,
2009.


2010

2009

2008Assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
6,169,000

$
8,207,000

$
7,049,000Prepaid expenses


1,211,000


1,258,000


1,498,000Intercompany receivables


114,703,000


111,466,000


46,910,000Income tax receivable





51,000


956,000Other receivables


75,000


67,000


44,000Equipment and leasehold improvements, net


380,000


458,000


669,000Investments in subsidiaries


20,396,000


18,293,000


16,919,000Other assets


716,000


1,187,000


425,000$
143,650,000

$
140,987,000

$
74,470,000


F-30

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

14. CONTINGENCIES



The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits from time to time, including those alleging professional errors or omissions that arise
in the ordinary course of business against firms that operate in the engineering and consulting professions. The Company carries professional liability insurance, subject to certain deductibles and
policy limits, for such claims as they arise and may from time to time establish reserves for litigation that is considered probable of a loss.

County of San Diego v. Willdan,Superior Court of California, Riverside County

A
complaint was filed against the Company on February 28, 2008 relating to a project for the reconstruction of a portion of Valley Center Road located in an unincorporated area of
San Diego County. The design was completed by the Company and a contract was awarded to a construction contractor for construction of the improvements. The construction was originally scheduled for
completion in December 2008; however completion was delayed until fall 2009. The lawsuit alleges that the delays in construction were caused by errors and omissions in our preparation of reports and
design and engineering of the project, resulting in additional design and construction costs, in an amount to be determined but alleged to be in excess of $5.0 million. The Company denies the
allegations asserted in the lawsuit and will vigorously defend against the claims.

French v. Willdan Engineering,Superior Court of California, Riverside County

In
January 1991, the Company was originally retained by the City of Calimesa, California to review and process development plans. The Company has provided plan review continuously since
that date under various contracts with the city. As the city receives applications from developers for project approvals, the city forwards the project plans to the Company for processing. The Company
processes the plans and the city pays the Company for its services. In August 2008, a suit was filed by a city employee alleging that the city processed development applications without first
collecting fees from developers to cover the costs of processing. The suit further alleges that even though the Company performed the work requested by the city, the city should not have paid the
Company for work in advance of collecting the developers' fees. The complaint was amended by the plaintiff in May 2010 to provide additional details and the Company has filed an answer to the
complaint. The plaintiff seeks to recover for the city amounts paid to the Company for processing project plans for which the developer fees have not been paid. The city of Calimesa has not requested
any refunds from the Company or joined in the litigation, and the city continues to retain the Company's services. The Company does not believe that this suit has any merit and will vigorously defend
this claim.

Vega v. City of Coachella,Superior Court of California, Riverside County

On
February 2, 2011, the Company was served with a lawsuit concerning a fatal traffic accident on Dillon Road at Harrison Place in the City of Coachella on October 7, 2008.
At the time of the accident, Dillon Road was in the midst of a street widening project. The Company had been under contract with the City of Coachella to provide construction management services. The
accident occurred when an individual driving southbound on Dillon Road ran the stop sign at the intersection of Harrison Place, colliding with a vehicle making a left turn from northbound Dillon Road
onto Harrison Place. The driver of the northbound vehicle was injured in the accident and a passenger seated in the

F-31

---



Table of Contents

WILLDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fiscal Years 2010, 2009 and 2008

14. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

front
passenger seat was killed. At the time of the accident, there were "STOP" signs posted in both directions on Dillon Road, the construction zone was posted with 25 mph speed limit signs and
construction zone signs, and there were "STOP AHEAD" signs posted in both directions on Dillon Road in advance of the intersection. The plaintiff seeks to recover unspecified damages from the Company.
The Company believes that the accident was caused solely by the southbound driver, and will vigorously defend this claim.

15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The tables below reflect selected quarterly information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010.

Fiscal Three Months EndedApril 2,
2010

July 2,
2010

October 1,
2010

December 31,
2010(in thousands except per share amounts)Contract revenue

$
16,951

$
20,367

$
20,706

$
19,872Income from operations


385


1,265


1,394


30Income tax expense (benefit)








595


(251
)Net income


392


1,258


788


282Earnings (loss) per share: basic and diluted

$
0.05

$
0.17

$
0.11

$
0.04Weighted-average shares outstanding:Basic


7,223


7,229


7,236


7,245Diluted


7,230


7,252


7,318


7,380




Fiscal Three Months EndedApril 3,
2009

July 3,
2009

October 2,
2009

January 1,
2010(in thousands except per share amounts)Contract revenue

$
17,185

$
15,484

$
14,561

$
14,375(Loss) income from operations


(705
)

(1,433
)

(1,385
)

(3,970)
(1)Income tax (benefit) expense


(250
)

(536
)

(510
)

(635
)Net (loss) income


(454
)

(898
)

(878
)

(3,345
)(Loss) earnings per share: basic and diluted

$
(0.06
)
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.46
)Weighted-average shares outstanding: Basic and diluted


7,169


7,188


7,204


7,208


(1)Loss
from operations for the fiscal three months ended January 1, 2010 includes impairment of goodwill of $2.8 million and a reduction in
litigation accrual expense of $1.1 million related to a claim settlement on a claim for indemnity in connection with a claim that arose in fiscal year 2002.


F-32

---