alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1989 

Adjourned November 22, 1989 

Convened January 2 3, 1990 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, March 21, 1990 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

* 

No. No. Bv 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 

386 576 Clifford R. Oviatt, Jr., of Virginia, to be Oct 4, 89 Mr. Kennedy, 

a Member of the National Labor Relations Committee on Labor and 

Board for the remainder of the term Human Resources, without 

expiring August 27, 1993, vice Wilford W. printed report. 

Johansen, resigned. 

389 771 Dennis M. Devaney, of Maryland, to be a Do. 

Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the term of five years expiring 

December 16, 1994. (Reappointment) 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

601 1029 John Wesley Bartlett, of Massachusetts, to Feb 21, 90 Mr. Johnston, 

be Director of the Off ice of Civilian Committee on Energy and 

Radioactive Waste Management, vice Ben C. Natural Resources, without 

Rusche resimed. printed reoort. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
#### Anna Mutka, an Infant, by Katie Falditzko, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, *v.*Hebrew Sheltering Guardian Society, Respondent.

*Mutka*v. *Ilebrew Sheltering Guardian Society,*129 App. Div. 923, affirmed.

(Argued January 18, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 6, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for personal injuries *597alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, her employer.

*Herbert C. Smyth*for appellant.

*Frank Verner Johnson, E. Clyde Sherwood*and *Harry S. Austin*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 7, 2014

s0204 

# Order

Clerk February 7, 2014

147612

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147612

COA: 309951

Washtenaw CC: 09

- 002072

- FH

ROBERT PAUL GEORGE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuan t to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the April 9, 2012 order of the Washtenaw Circuit

Court. It appears that the circuit court did not recognize that it could exercise its

discretion to modify the method of the defendant’s restitution payment under MCL

780.766(12), even where the defendant’s restitution stemmed from a plea agreement.

The statute makes no distinction between restitution ordered as a part of a plea agreement

or otherwise. We REMAND this case to the circuit court for a determination under the

statute whether payment under the existing order will impose a manifest hardsh ip on the

defendant or his immediate family, and whether modifying the method of payment will

impose a manifest hardship on the victims. Upon making these determinations, the

circuit court may, in its discretion, determine whether to modify the method of payment.
<PAGE> 1


                                 Exhibit 10.2

              Employment Agreement between David P. Marchetti, Sr.
                  and Security of Pennsylvania Financial Corp.

                           

<PAGE> 2



Exhibit 10.2

         Mr.  Marchetti's  Employment  Agreement  is the same as the  Employment
Agreement in Exhibit 10.1,  which is incorporated  herein by reference except as
to: (i) the name of the signatory,  which is David P.  Marchetti,  Sr.; (ii) the
position in Section 1, which is Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer; (iii) the
signatory for the Company,  which is Richard C. Laubach;  and (iv) the amount of
the base salary in Section 3(a), which is $75,000.
Dear Jacob K. Javits Project Director:

Enclosed please find the instructions and forms necessary to complete your Final Performance Report (FPR) for the Fiscal Year (FY) XXXX Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program. Attachment B of your FY XXXX grant award notification requires all institutional gra nt recipients to submit a final performance report within 90 days after the end date of the grant . The U.S. Department of Education is requesting information on students who received Jacob K. Javits fellowships through a grant to your institution that beg an on September 1, XXXX, and ended on August 31, XXXX. **Please be sure to complete and submit the enclosed report form on or before the due date, [insert date].**  **NOTE:** You are not required to submit a FPR by [insert date] if your FY XXXX project period has been extended beyond August 31, XXXX. **However, you will need to provide information on any student within that cohort within 90 days after the extended end date of your grant** 
. This FPR for the Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program is used to collect in formation that will help the U.S. Department of Education to assess the Javits program’s accomplishments towards meeting the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). The two GPRA performance measures for the Javits program are: 1. Time to degree completion for Javits Fellows will be less than the national average of 7.5 years 2. The percentage of Javits Fellows obtaining graduate degrees will be greater than the national average (30%) The GPRA efficiency measure for the Javits program is: 1. The Federal cost per terminal degree (Ph.D., M.F.A.) awarded for the Javits Fellowship Program Other data collected by the report will provide valuable information on how the fellows finance the remainder of their graduate education beyond the 4
- yea r performance period of the Javits fellowship and the types of employment they pursue. As a Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program Coordinator, obligation to respond to this FPR is required to obtain or retain Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program benefits. **Definitions:** Budget Period
- A one -year interval of time within a project period, which exists for budget reporting purposes. Project Period
- The four
-year period that is the total length of the grant. Please feel free to contact me at Carmen.Gordon@ed.gov or 202
- 219
- 7138 should you have any questions.Thank you for your continued support of the Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program
.

Sincerely, Carmen Gordon Program Specialist Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1713 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1713

   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2009

  Mr. Boren (for himself, Mr. Cole, Ms. Fallin, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. 
    Lucas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 
 and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
              LABORATORY, LANE, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The South Central Agricultural Research 
Laboratory of the Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and redesignated as the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research 
Laboratory''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the South Central 
Agricultural Research Laboratory shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research Laboratory''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WES WATKINS POST OFFICE, BENNINGTON, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 310 North Perry Street in Bennington, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Wes Watkins Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wes 
Watkins Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.3





 Exhibit 4.3 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 

VERIZON SAVINGS AND SECURITY PLAN 

FOR NEW YORK AND NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATES 

This Amendment is adopted this 19th day of July, 2016. 

WHEREAS, Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) maintains the Verizon Savings and Security Plan for New York and New England Associates
(Savings Plan); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18.1 of the Savings Plan, the plan may be amended by the Verizon Employee
Benefits Committee (VEBC) acting on behalf of Verizon in a settlor capacity; 
 WHEREAS, the Chairman of the VEBC is authorized by
the VEBC to act on behalf of the VEBC; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Savings Plan in accordance with applicable
collective bargaining agreements to allow supplementary contributions of up to 19% of eligible compensation. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
effective 90 days following the June 17, 2016, effective date of the applicable collective bargaining agreements, the Savings Plan is amended as follows: 

1.    The third sentence of Section 4.1 of the Savings Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

An employee who has authorized the maximum basic contribution of 6% may authorize a supplementary contribution consisting of any whole
percentage of such Eligible Employee’s Compensation as an Employee Supplementary Pre-Tax Contribution, an Employee Supplementary After-Tax Contribution, or a
combination of both which when added to the 6% Employee Basic Contribution results in a total contribution of not more than 25% of such Eligible Employee’s Compensation 

2.    The last sentence of the second paragraph of Section 4.7 of the Savings Plan is amended to read in its entirety
as follows: 
 The amount of such catch-up contributions for a payroll period shall range from a
minimum amount of 1% to a maximum amount of 60% of the Participating Employee’s Compensation for such payroll period (such that the total contribution from pay under this Section and Section 4.1 cannot exceed 85% of the Participating
Employee’s Compensation), and shall be expressed as a whole percentage of such Compensation. 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first set forth
above. 
  

			
		 	Verizon Communications Inc.
		
	By:	 	  /s/ Marc C. Reed

		 	Marc C. Reed
		
		 	Chairman of the Verizon Employee Benefits Committee
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Uri Nissani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/S/ Uri Nissani


Uri Nissani


Chief Executive Officer





May 17, 2010
#### William T. Lee, *Respondent, v.*The Atlantic Yacht Club, *Appellant*.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
# CE2009184EN.01012001.xml

| 6.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 184/120 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 184/120

---

Tuesday 19 February 2008EC-Switzerland Agreement on the MEDIA 2007 programme *

P6_TA(2008)0046

P6_TA(2008)0046

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 February 2008 on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the Community and the Swiss Confederation in the audiovisual field, establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the Community programme MEDIA 2007, and a Final Act (COM(2007)0477 — C6-0328/2007 — 2007/0171(CNS))

2009/C 184 E/31

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2007)0477),

having regard to Article 150(4) and Article 157(3), in conjunction with Article 300(2), first sentence, of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0328/2007),

having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0512/2007),

| 1. | Approves the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Swiss Confederation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Swiss Confederation.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Mechanisms of Immune Modulation.                     

*Date:*                         March 22-23, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         4 p.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hills Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Martina Schmidt, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3456,                         *schmidma@mail.nih.gov*.                     

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1039 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 13.12 Documentation of fees and expenses. ( a ) All applicants must be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, exhibit, analysis, report, test or other similar item, for which the applicant seeks reimbursement.
( b ) The documentation shall include an affidavit from each attorney, agent, or expert witness representing or appearing in behalf of the party, stating the actual time expended, the rate at which fees and other expenses were computed, a description of the specific services performed, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. Where the adversary adjudication includes covered proceedings (as described in § 13.3) as well as excluded proceedings, or two or more matters, each of which could have been heard separately, the fees and expenses shall be shown separately for each proceeding or matter, and the basis for allocating expenses among the proceedings or matters shall be indicated. ( 1 ) The affidavit shall itemize in detail the services performed by the date, number of hours per date and the services performed during those hours. In order to establish the hourly rate, the affidavit shall state the hourly rate which is billed and paid by the majority of clients during the relevant time periods.
( 2 ) If no hourly rate is paid by the majority of clients because, for instance, the attorney or agent represents most clients on a contingency basis, the attorney or agent shall provide affidavits from two attorneys or agents with similar experience, who perform similar work, stating the hourly rate which they bill and are paid by the majority of their clients during a comparable time period.
( c ) If the applicant seeks reimbursement of any expenses not covered by the affidavit described in paragraph (b), the documentation must also include an affidavit describing all such expenses and stating the amounts paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided.
( d ) The adjudicative officer may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any fees or expenses claimed, pursuant to § 13.25 of this part.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0990-0118) [48 FR 45252, Oct. 4, 1983, as amended at 69 FR 2847, Jan. 21, 2004]
#### § 641.13 Right of action

The procedures set forth in this part establish internal procedures to be followed by NSF in considering the potential environmental effects of actions taken in Antarctica. Nothing in this part shall be construed to create a cause of action.
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.112 Review by institution.

Research covered by this policy that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB.