BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov1BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAMFramework Public Meetingfor Automatic Commercial Ice-Maker(ACIM) EquipmentpicturesCharles LlenzaDecember 16, 2010ACIM-2010-STD-0037@ee.doe.govBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov2•MeetingAgenda•Introductions•RoleoftheFacilitator•GroundRules–Listenasanally–Focusonissues–Useshort,succinctstatements/keeptothepoint–Onepersonspeaksatatime(raisehandtoberecognized;stateyournamefortherecord)–Holdsidebarconversationsoutsidetheroom–Setcellphonestosilent/vibrate•HousekeepingItemsWelcomeandIntroductionsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov3AttendingPartiesOpeningStatementsAtthistimeDOEwelcomesopeningremarks/statementsontheframeworkdocumentforautomaticcommercialice‐makers.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov4PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverviewandFramework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov5MeetingPurpose•Presentproceduralandanalyticalapproachestoevaluateenergyconservationstandardsforautomaticcommercialice‐makers.•Provideaforumforpublicdiscussionofrulemakingissues.•Encourageinterestedpartiestosubmitdata,information,andwrittencomments.•Informinterestedpartiesandfacilitatetherulemakingprocess.IntroductionBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov6IntroductionIssueBox:IntheRulemakingFrameworkDocumentforAutomaticCommercialIce‐MakingEquipment,DOEwelcomescommentsonparticularissuesraisedinatextboxlikethis.Throughoutthispresentation,specificissueswillberaisedfordiscussiononslidessuchasthis,withidentifyingnumberscorrespondingtothoseintheframeworkdocument.Inaddition,DOEhasaddedsomequestionsthatarenotintheframeworkdocument.Thesequestionsareidentifiedbyaletter.Nonetheless,commentsconcerninganypartofthedocumentorpresentationarewelcome.Note:ThepresentationcontainsthemajorityofthequestionsaspresentedintheFrameworkdocument.Foracompletesetofquestions,pleaserefertoAppendixAoftheFrameworkdocument.Request for Comment FormatBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov7PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverview&Framework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov8RegulatoryHistory•EnergyPolicyandConservationAct(EPCA)of1975(PublicLaw94‐163).–Establishedtheenergyconservationprogram.–EnergyPolicyAct(EPACT)2005amendmenttoEPCA.–Prescribedstandardsforcubeice‐makerswithcapacitiesbetween50and2,500lbper24‐hourperiod,effectiveJanuary1,2010.–AuthorizesDOEtoissuestandardsforothertypesofautomaticcommercialice‐makersthatarenotcoveredby42U.S.C.6313(d)(2)(A).–DirectedDOE,nolaterthanJanuary1,2015,toissueafinalruleafterdeterminingwhetheramendingtheapplicablestandardsistechnologicallyfeasibleandeconomicallyjustified.42U.S.C.6313(d)(3)(A)Energy Conservation StandardBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov9TestProcedure•ThepreviousDOEtestprocedurefinalrule,publishedinDecember2006,adoptedARIStandard810‐2003astheDOEtestprocedure.71FR71340,71350.–ReferencesASHRAEStandard29‐1988(RA2005)asthemethodoftest.–Adoptsarevisedmethodforcalculatingtheenergyconsumptionrate.•AnupdatedAHRItestprocedurehassincebeenpublished–AHRIStandard810‐2007.•ASHRAEhassinceupdateditsstandardtoASHRAEStandard29‐2009.RegulatoryHistoryBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov10PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverview&Framework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov11ScopeRegulatoryDefinition•Section136(a)(4)ofEPACT2005defines“automaticcommercialicemaker”as:–[A]factory‐madeassembly(notnecessarilyshippedinonepackage)that–•(A)consistsofacondensingunitandice‐makingsectionoperatingasanintegratedunit,withmeansformakingandharvestingice;and•(B)mayincludemeansforstoringice,dispensingice,orstoringanddispensingice.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov12•ECS– EnergyConservationStandard.•IceMakingHead(IMH):Amodelwiththeice‐makingmechanismandthecondensingunitinasinglepackage,butwithaseparateicestoragebin.•RemoteCondensingUnit(RCU)orSplitSystemUnit:Amodelinwhichtheice‐makingmechanismandcondenserorcondensingunitareinseparatesections.•Self‐Contained(SCU):Amodelinwhichtheice‐makingmechanismandstoragecompartmentareinanintegralcabinet.•Cubed:Cubedicemachineshaveanalternatefreezingandharvestingperiod.Wateriscirculatedoveranevaporatorwhereitfreezesuntilcubesarefullyformed.Thecubediceisthenharvestedandmovedtostorage.Theicemaybeincubeshape,orinavariationofasolidshape.•Flake:Flakeicemachinesproduceicecontinuously,usuallyinabarrel‐shapedevaporator.Anaugerinsidetheevaporatorscrapesiceoffthesidesintoastoragebin.•Nugget:Nuggeticemachinesusethesameprocessasflakemachinesbutcompresstheiceflakesintonuggets.•Potablewater:Potablewateristhewaterusedinmakingicethatbecomesiceorisdrainedasdumpwater.ScopeDefinitions for Today’s DiscussionBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov13Scope•EPCA,asamendedbyEPACT2005,prescribedstandardsforautomaticcommercialice‐makers,effectiveJanuary1,2010.42U.S.C.6313(d)EquipmentType*TypeofCoolingHarvestRatelbice/24hoursMaximumEnergyUsekWh/100lbiceMaximumCondenserWaterUse‐‐gal/100lbiceIce‐MakingHeadWater<5007.80‐0.0055Hb200‐0.022H≥500and<1,4365.58‐0.0011H200‐0.022H≥1,4364.0200‐0.022HAir<45010.26‐0.0086HN/A≥4506.89‐0.0011HN/ARemoteCondensing(butnotremotecompressor)Air<1,0008.85‐0.0038HN/A≥1,0005.10N/ARemoteCondensingandRemoteCompressorAir<9348.85‐0.0038HN/A≥9345.3N/ASelf‐ContainedWater<20011.40‐0.019H191‐0.0315H≥2007.60191‐0.0315HAir<17518.0‐0.069HN/A≥1759.80N/A*ApplicabletocubemachinesonlyBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov14KeyIssues•Coverageoficeproduced,e.g.block,flake,nugget,cracked–DOEisconsideringtoissueanewstandardforcontinuous‐typeflakeandnugget,andtubemachineswithcapacitiesbetween50and4,000lbper24‐hourperiod.•Coverageasitrelatestosize,definedby24‐hourharvestrate,–DOEisconsideringamendingtheexistingstandardforcubemachinesandextendingittoincludemachineswithcapacitiesupto4,000lbper24‐hourperiod.•TestProcedureupdate.•Potablewateruse.•Stand‐byandoff‐modeenergyuse.ScopeAdditionalCommentA‐DOEwelcomestheidentificationofadditionalkeyscopingissuesnotidentifiedhereorwithintheframeworkdocument.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov15PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverview&Framework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov16RulemakingOverview&FrameworkEPCA Seven Factors•42U.S.C.6295(o)(2)(B)(i)directsDOEtoconsidersevenfactorswhensettingenergyconservationstandards:EPCAFactorsDOEAnalysis1.EconomicimpactonconsumersandmanufacturersLife‐CycleCostAnalysisandManufacturerImpactAnalysis2.LifetimeoperatingcostsavingscomparedtoincreasedcostfortheequipmentLife‐CycleCostAnalysis3.TotalprojectedenergysavingsNationalImpactAnalysis4.ImpactonutilityorperformanceEngineeringAnalysisandScreeningAnalysis5.ImpactofanylesseningofcompetitionManufacturerImpactAnalysis6.NeedfornationalenergyconservationNationalImpactAnalysis7.OtherfactorstheSecretaryconsidersrelevantEnvironmentalAssessment,UtilityImpactAnalysis,andEmploymentImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov17RulemakingOverview&FrameworkFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)FinalRule•DOEpublishedaFederalRegisternoticeonNovember19,2010.75FR70852•Today’spublicmeetingcoverstheFrameworkdocumentsforautomaticcommercialice‐makers(ACIM).•Frameworkdocumentprovides:–Overviewoftherulemakingprocess–ProvidesavenuesforinterestedpartiestosubmitcommentsbyJanuary18,2011.–Theframeworkinformationandmaterialsareavailableonlineat:http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/automatic_ice_making_equipment.htmlRulemaking Process StepsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov18FrameworkDocumentPublicMeetingDecember16,2010RulemakingOverview&FrameworkECSPreliminaryAnalysisPublicMeetingPlanned‐September2011ECSNOPRPublicMeetingPlanned‐May2012201120142010201220132016EstimatedECSFinalRuleComplianceDateJanuary20152015TPNOPRPublicMeetingPlanned– Spring2011Rulemaking TimelineBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov19PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverview&Framework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov20PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov21PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarketandTechnologyAssessment•Characterizethemarkets,theautomaticcommercialice‐makerindustry,andthepotentialtechnologicalmeasuresthatimproveefficiency.Method•Identifyandcharacterizemanufacturersofautomaticcommercialice‐makers;•Estimateshipmentsandtrendsinthemarket;•Identifyregulatoryandnon‐regulatoryinitiativesintendedtoimprovetheefficiencyoftheequipmentcoveredunderthisrulemaking;and•Identifytechnologiesthatcouldimproveefficiencyofequipment.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov22PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem3‐1DOEseeksinformationonannualshipmentsintotheU.S.marketfrom1995to2010(bothdomesticandimports)byequipmentclass,andthecorrespondingshipment‐weightedaverageefficiencyoftheseshipments.Item3‐2DOEseeksinformationontheproportion(s)ofequipmentshippedannuallythatreplacesexistingequipment.AdditionalCommentB‐DOEseeksinputanddataonestimatesofmarketshares,equipmentfeatures,andefficiencytrendsfortheautomaticcommercialice‐makerscoveredinthisrulemaking.AdditionalCommentC‐DOEseeksinputondistributionchannelsusedforsalesofcoveredequipment.Request for CommentsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov23PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureProposedClassesforCommercialIce‐MakersTypeofIceEquipmentTypeTypeofCoolingHarvestCapacityRatelb/dayCubeFlakeNuggetIce‐MakingHeadWater<500ExistingPotentialPotential≥500and<1,436ExistingPotentialPotential≥1,436ExistingPotentialPotentialAir<450ExistingPotentialPotential≥450ExistingPotentialPotentialRemoteCondensing(butnotremotecompressor)Air<1,000ExistingPotentialPotential≥1,000ExistingPotentialPotentialRemoteCondensingandRemoteCompressorAir<934ExistingPotentialPotential≥934ExistingPotentialPotentialSelf‐ContainedUnitWater<200ExistingPotentialPotential≥200ExistingPotentialPotentialAir<175ExistingPotentialPotential≥175ExistingPotentialPotentialDesignedforConnectiontoaCompressorRackSystemTBDALLN/APotentialPotentialBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov24PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem3‐4DOErequestsfeedbackonpromulgatinganewstandardtoincludeflake,nugget,andtube‐typeice‐makingmachines.Item3‐6DOErequestsfeedbackontube‐typemachines. DOEunderstandsthemachineshavetube‐shapedevaporatorsand/ormaketube‐shapediceandthatthesemachinesoperatecyclicallylikecubemachines,buttheydonotproduceclearice.DOErequestscommentonwhetherseparateequipmentclassesshouldbeestablishedforsuchequipment.Ifyes,whataretheappropriatecapacityrangesfortheseclasses?Ifnot,withwhichoftheproposedequipmentclassesshouldthetubemachinesbegrouped?Request for CommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov25PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureAdditionalCommentD‐DOEseekscommentsonwhetheraseparateproductclassisneededforicemakersdesignedforconnectiontoaremotecompressorracksystem.AdditionalCommentE‐DOEseekscommentontheappropriatecapacitybreakdownbyharvestrateforicerack‐connectedmachines.Item3‐7DOErequestsfeedbackconcerningtheproposedharvestratebreakdowns,andiftheyaccuratelyreflectthecurrentmarket.Item3‐9DOErequestscommentonincludingice‐makerswithcapacitiesgreaterthan4,000poundsperdayinthisrulemaking. IfDOEshouldincludestandardsforice‐makerswithcapacitieslargerthan4,000poundsperday,whatshouldtherangeofcapacitiesbeinthisrulemakingRequest for Comment (cont.)BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov26PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureCommercial Ice Maker Energy Use by Sector. ADL, 1996.Office4%Retail9%FoodService14%FoodSales4%Education8%Lodging22%HealthCare39%ENERGY STAR –No specifiedbuilding use typeFEMP –No specified buildinguse typeCEE –Member programs targetrestaurant applicationsAdditionalCommentF‐DOErequestsinputonregulatoryandnon‐regulatoryinitiatives,inadditiontoENERGYSTAR,theCEE,andFEMP.Regulatory and Non RegulatoryInitiativesBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov27PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureEquipmentApplicabilityTechnologyOptionsCubeFlakeNuggetTubeNoteHigher‐efficiencycompressors√√√√Largercondenser√√√√Higher‐efficiencycondenserfan/motor,morecondenserairflow√√√√N/AforwatercooledequipmentHigher‐efficiencyaugermotorN/A√√N/AHigher‐efficiencypump/motor√N/AN/A√Drainwaterthermalexchange√N/AN/AN/AReducedharvestmeltage√N/ANA√Reducedevaporatorthermalcycling√N/ANA√Better/thickerinsulation√√√√Morecondenserwaterflow√√√√N/AforaircooledmachinesLesspotablewaterflow√N/AN/AN/ALarger‐diametersuctionline√√√√Remote‐compressorequipmentBrazedplatecondenser√√√√OnlyforwatercooledequipmentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov28PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem3‐10Whattechnologiesordesigns,ifany,shouldbeaddedtoorremovedfromtheabovelist?Ifcertaintechnologiesonthelistarenotapplicabletoallequipmentclasses,whatequipmentclassesareaffected?Incommentingondesignoptions,pleasediscussanypotentialimpactsonsafety,performance,andconsumerutility.RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov29PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•EPACT2005establishedstandardsforcondenserwateruseforwater‐cooledautomaticcommercialice‐makers.•DOEhasidentifiedseveralissuespertainingtotheamendmentofthecondenserwaterusestandards:–Reductionofcondenserwaterusecanincreaseenergyuse.–Thecostimpactsofcondenserwaterusereductionscanvary,dependingonthesource(tapwaterflusheddownthedrain,coolingtower,chilledwater,pumpedwellwater).–Theenergysavingtechnologiesindirectlyallowreductionofcondenserwaterusebypreventingenergyuseincreasewhencondenserwaterflowisdecreased,howeverDOEhasnotidentifiedtechnologyoptionsthatdirectlyreducecondenserwateruse.AdditionalCommentG‐DOEseekscommentwhetheranytechnologyoptionsnotyetidentifiedareavailabletoreducecondenserwateruse;andseeksdatasourcesontheprevalenceofdifferentsourcesforcoolingwater.ConsiderationofCondenserWaterUseBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov30PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedurePotableWater•DOEisconsideringtheregulationofpotablewaterusedinmakingice,inadditiontocondenserwateruse.•Reducingpotablewateruseisexpectedtoreduceenergyuse;hencetheenergystandardtendstoindirectlylimitpotablewateruse.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov31PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem3‐11DOErequestsfeedbackonpotablewateruseasametric.Item3‐12DOErequestscommentontherelationshipbetweenpotablewateruseandenergyefficiency.Specifically,towhatdegreeispotablewaterefficiencylikelytoincreasewithincreasedstringencyofenergyefficiencyrequirementsfortheice‐makerscoveredunderthisrulemakingwithoutexplicitpotablewaterefficiencyrequirements?Item3‐13DOEseeksfeedbackonincludingtotalwateruseinthetechnologicalassessment.Item3‐14DOEseeksinputonwhattechnologiesordesignsshouldbeconsideredtoimprovewaterefficiencies(bothpotableandcondenserwater).RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov32PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov33PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureImpactsonhealthorsafetyImpactsonequipmentutilityoravailabilitytoconsumersPracticabilitytomanufacture,install,andserviceTechnologicalfeasibility•Purpose‐ScreenouttechnologyoptionsthatDOEwillnotconsiderintheengineeringanalysisforautomaticcommercialice‐makerequipment.•Approach‐DOEwillevaluateeachtechnologyoptionbasedonthefollowingfourscreeningcriteria:Item4‐1DOEwelcomescommentsonthefourscreeningcriteria.ScreeningAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov34PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov35PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•Akeyfactorinsettingthestandardistheincreasedcostofmore‐efficientequipment.•Theengineeringanalysisdeterminestherelationshipbetweencostandefficiency.RulemakingAnalyses•Life‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriod•ManufacturerImpactAnalysis•EmploymentImpactAnalysisManufacturerSellingPrice–EfficiencyRelationship

Manufacturer Selling PriceEfficiencyLevelEngineeringAnalysisGoalsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov36PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem5‐6DOErequestsfeedbackontheuseofacombinedanalysisapproachthatusesmultipleinformationsourcestodeterminetherelationshipbetweenmanufacturersellingpriceandenergyconsumptionforautomaticcommercialice‐makers.•EngineeringAnalysisApproaches–DesignOptionApproach:Determinationofefficiencyandimprovementpotentialbasedonindividualandgroupsofdesignoptions.–EfficiencyLevelApproach:Costinformationcollected(i.e.,fromtheindustry)atpredeterminedefficiencylevelstorepresentcost/efficiencyrelationship.–ReverseEngineeringApproach:Costsfortheefficiencylevelsassociatedwithreverse‐engineeredproductsarecalculatedusingamanufacturingcostmodel.•DOEintendstouseacombinationoftheseapproaches,usingmultipleavailabledatasourcestodevelopthecost‐efficiencyrelationships.EngineeringAnalysisMethodologyBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov37PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•DOEmustconsiderthepotentialtradeoffsbetweenenergyuseandcondenserwateruseofwater‐cooledequipmentinitsengineeringanalysis.Item5‐1DOEseekscommentsfromstakeholdersprovidinginsightsregardingsuchtrade‐offs.Item5‐4DOEseekscommentonsimplifyingassumptionsthatmaybemadetoreducethepotentialcomplexityofmaximizingbenefitsassociatedwithbothwaterandenergyusereductions.EnergyUse/CondenserWaterUseTradeoffsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov38PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•Inmanyrulemakings,DOErequestscost‐efficiencydatafromtheindustrytosupplementitsownanalysis.•Thisdataisgenerallycollectedandaggregatedbytheapplicabletradeorganization(AHRIforautomaticcommercialice‐makers)toprotecttheprivacyoftheinformationprovidedbyindividualmanufacturers.Item5‐2DOErequestscommentsonthebestwaystocollectsuchinformationfromtheindustry.DOEanticipatesthatsuchdatamightbecollectedandaggregatedbyAHRIforsubmittaltoDOE.Item5‐3DOErequestsinputonappropriatecategoriesandquestionstobeincludedinsuchrequestsfordata.Item5‐4ADOEseekscommentsandrecommendationsregardingthepotentialdatacollectioneffortsthatmightbemadebyindustryparticipantstosupportthisrulemaking,andthepossiblestructureofdatarequestformsthatcouldbeusedtoassistsuchefforts.IndustryDataCollectionBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov39PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure#Equip.TypeCapacitylb/24hrEnergykWh/100lbicePotableWatergal/100lbiceCondenserWatergal/100lbiceWidthin.EnergyTest1IMH‐A2707.720030x2IMH‐A3245.822.6022x3IMH‐A7805.720.50304IMH‐A844518.40305IMH‐A1,4604.95200486IMH‐A1,5604.118.8048x7IMH‐W8514.419.7153308IMH‐W2,8203.619.716648x9RCU‐A1,5104.592004810RCU‐A1,6943.818.1036x11RCU‐A2,3504.6419.704812SCU‐A1218.417.8023.75x13SCU‐A11211.83402414SCU‐W2855.51818030x•DOEplanstopurchaseforteardownthefollowingcube‐typeice‐makingmachines.•Roughlyhalfwillbetestedpriortoteardown,asindicated.ProductTeardownsandTestingBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov40PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure#Equip.TypeFlake/NuggetCapacitylb/24hrEnergykWh/100lbiceWidthin.EnergyTest15IMH‐AN3107.42216IMH‐AN8225.43017IMH‐AF8453.40x18RCU‐AF17802.542x19SCU‐AN2805.716x•DOEplanstopurchaseforteardownthefollowingflakeandnuggetmachines.Somewillbetested,asindicated.AdditionalCommentH‐DOErequestscommentsonitsplansforteardownsandtesting.Inparticular,whattypes,capacities,orsizesofequipmentarenotsufficientlywellrepresented?ProductTeardownsandTesting(contd.)BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov41PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem5‐5DOEisalsointerestedinreceivingequipmenttestdata(testprocedureused,ratingconditions,harvestrate,voltage,integratedaverageproducttemperature,dailyenergyconsumption,etc.).Testdatarepresentativeofthebaselinemodelineachequipmentclassisparticularlyimportant.•DOErealizesthatitsowntesteffortsarelimitedandthatadditionaltestdatamaybehelpfulforboththeengineeringanalysisandthetestprocedurerulemaking.EquipmentTestDataBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov42PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•DOEproposesthefollowingbaselineefficiencylevelsfortheanalyses.•NumericalLevelsarepresentedintheFrameworkDocument.Item3‐17DOEseeksfeedbackontheproposedbaselines.*TheNRCanstandardforFlake/Nuggetmachinesdistinguishesonlythetypeofcooling(airorwater)andcapacity(<700lb/dayand>700lb/day).Equipment ClassBaselinesforbothEnergyUseandCondenserWaterUse(for water‐cooledequipment)PotablewaterUse(ifregulated)CubersCurrentDOEStandardAveragefortheclassFlakeandNuggetMachinesOption1:NaturalResources Canada(NRCan) Standard*Option2: Two‐partcurvesbasedonbestfitoftheequipmentefficiencydataNot applicable,sincevariationisnotexpected.BaselineEfficiencyLevelsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov43Description*BaselineEL1EL2EL3EL4EL5Max.AvailableIMH‐W‐SmallDOEStandard10%15%20%25%IMH‐W‐MedDOEStandard10%15%20%22%IMH‐W‐LargeDOEStandard10%15%20%23%IMH‐A‐SmallDOEStandard10%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)20%24%IMH‐A‐LargeDOEStandard10%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)20%21%RCU‐NRC‐SmallDOEStandard9%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)20%25%20%RCU‐NRC‐LargeDOEStandard9%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)20%25%27%RCU‐RC‐SmallDOEStandard9%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)12%RCU‐RC‐LargeDOEStandard9%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)15%SCU‐W‐SmallDOEStandard7%15%20%25%25%SCU‐W‐LargeDOEStandard7%15%20%25%28%**SCU‐A‐SmallDOEStandard7%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)20%25%30%32%SCU‐A‐LargeDOEStandard7%(E‐STAR)15%(CEE3)20%25%30%31%PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureIncrementalProposedefficiencylevels(EL)forcubemachines*ENERGYSTARandCEElabelsapplytoair‐cooledcubemachinesattheefficiencylevelsindicated.**Thisisthemaxavailablefor“undercounter”self‐containedequipment.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov44Proposedefficiencylevels(EL)forflakeandnuggetmachines(Option1)PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureDescriptionBaselineMin.Available*EL1EL2EL3EL4EL5EL6Max.Available*IMH‐W‐SmallNRCan Standard28%20%25%30%35%40%45%46%IMH‐W‐LargeNRCan Standard19%48%IMH‐A‐SmallNRCanStandard‐33%10%20%30%35%40%45%47%IMH‐A‐LargeNRCanStandard16%52%RCU‐NRC‐SmallNRCanStandard16%15%25%35%40%45%50%28%RCU‐NRC‐LargeNRCanStandard19%64%RCU‐RCNRCanStandard20%10%20%25%30%RCU‐RackNRCanStandard60%**91%SCU‐W‐SmallNRCanStandard15%15%20%25%30%35%SCU‐W‐LargeNRCanStandardNoproductscurrentlyavailableSCU‐A‐SmallNRCanStandard‐11%10%20%30%35%40%45%46%SCU‐A‐LargeNRCan StandardNoproductscurrentlyavailable*DOEdetermined“MinAvailable”and“MaxAvailable”efficiencylevelsbasedonproductsonmanufacturerwebsitesandintheCEC,ENERGYSTAR,CEE,AHRI,andNaturalResourcesCanada(NRCan)databases.**EfficiencylevelsreportedfortheseproductsarebasedontheNRCan Standard,buttheultimateselectionwilldependondecisionsmadeformeasurementoftheirenergyuse.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov45PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureAdditionalCommentI‐DOEseeksinputfromstakeholdersaboutitsproposedefficiencylevels(thesemaybeusedforcollectingincrementalcostdatafrommanufacturers).DOEalsoseeksinputfromstakeholdersonappropriatemaximumtechnologicallyfeasibleefficiencylevels.RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov46PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•DOEwillevaluatealldesignoptionsthatarecommerciallyavailableorpresentinaworkingprototype,includingproprietarydesignsandtechnologies.•Proprietarydesignswillonlybeconsiderediftheydonotpresentauniquepathtoagivenefficiencylevel.•Theconfidentialityofmanufacturerswillbemaintained.Item5‐8ArethereproprietarydesignsthatDOEshouldconsiderintheanalysesforanyoftheequipmentunderconsiderationbythisrulemaking?Ifso,howshouldDOEacquirethecostdatanecessaryforevaluatingthesedesigns?Conversely,arethereproprietarydesignsthatshouldnotbeconsidered?Whichproductsusethesedesigns?ProprietaryDesignsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov47•CurrentDOETestProcedure–ARIStandard810‐2003,finalrulepublishedinDecember2006(71FR71340,71350)–ReferencesASHRAEStandard29‐1988(RA2005)asthemethodoftest.–Adoptsarevisedmethodforcalculatingtheenergyconsumptionrate.•UpdatesfortheCurrentTestProcedureRulemaking–AnupdatedAHRItestprocedurehassincebeenpublished– AHRIStandard810‐2007.–ASHRAEhassinceupdateditsstandardtoASHRAEStandard29‐2009.–StandbyandOffModesarenotbeingconsidered.PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureTestProcedureUpdateBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov48•EPCAprovidesthatifARIStandard810‐2003isamended,theSecretaryshallamendtheDOEtestproceduretobeconsistentunlesstodosowouldnotmeettheEPCArequirementsfortestprocedures.42U.S.C.6314(a)(7)(B)•DOEisconsideringreferencingAHRIStandard810‐2007astheDOEtestprocedure.–Expandsthetestproceduretoapplytocube‐(orbatch‐)typeandcontinuous‐typeautomaticcommercialice‐makers,regardlessoficetype,withcapacitiesupto4,000lbperday.•DOEisalsoconsideringreferencingASHRAEStandard29‐2009intheDOEtestprocedure.–ReflectssamechangesasAHRIStandard810‐2007.PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureAdditionalCommentJ‐DOErequestscommentonmodifyingthecurrentDOEtestproceduretoreferencetheupdatedAHRIStandard810‐2007andASHRAEStandard29‐2009.UpdatingtoCurrentIndustryVersionsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov49•DOErecognizesthatthereareautomaticice‐makersinthemarketwithcapacitieslargerthan4,000lbper24hours.•DOEunderstandslargercapacitymachinescanbetestedusingthetestmethodsinAHRIStandard810‐2007andASHRAEStandard29‐2009.PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureAdditionalCommentK‐DOErequestscommentonapplyingtheAHRI810‐2007testproceduretolargercapacityequipment.LargerCapacityEquipmentTestingBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov50•ThecurrentDOEtestprocedurerequiresreportingcondenserwateruseonly.•DOEisconsideringaddingamethodtocalculatethetotalwateruse:PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureAdditionalCommentL‐DOErequestscommentontheproposedcalculationoftotalwateruse.total water use (gal/100 lb ice) =condenser water use (gal/100 lb ice) +potable water used in making ice (gal/100 lb ice)TotalWaterUseMetricCalculationBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov51•Inconsistencyinreportingofenergyuseofremotecondensingicemakers:–IceMakerswithdedicatedremotecondensingunitsreportenergyconsumptionofthetotalicemakingmachine,includingtheicemakinghead,compressorandcondenser.–IceMakersthataremeanttobeusedwitharemotecompressorrackthatcouldservemultipleappliancesreportonlytheenergyuseoftheicemakinghead.PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureRemoteCondensingUnitTestingIssueBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov52PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureDOEseesthreepotentialoptionstoaddressthisissue:1.AcalculationmethodthatappliesadefaultfactortotheIMHenergyconsumptionthatisrepresentativeofremotecondenser andcompressorrackenergyuse2.Ameasurementmethodthatmeasurestheenergyuseofaremotecondensingicemakerwithadesignatedremote condenser3.Continuetoreport onlyenergyconsumedbytheIMHwithoutremotecondenserorcompressorenergyuseAdditionalCommentM‐DOErequestscommentonhowtheenergyconsumptionoficemakersthataredesignedtobeconnectedtoaremoterackshouldbecalculatedintheDOEtestprocedure.Specifically,DOErequestscommentontheprosandconsofthethreeproposedmethods.RemoteCondensingUnitTestingIssue(cont.)BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov53•DOEhasidentifiedseveralfactorsthatmayaffecttheaccuracyandrepeatabilityoftestprocedureresults,including:–WaterHardness–Icequality–Icetemperature–Diameterandinsulationofrefrigerationline–Condenserairinlettemperature–Topclearanceaboveice‐makerPreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureAdditionalCommentN‐DOErequestscommentonpotentialinaccuraciesorsourcesoferrorinthetestprocedure,includingbutnotlimitedtotheitemslistedabove.Iflargesourcesoferrorexist,DOErequestscommentonhowthetestproceduremightbeamendedtoaddresstheseinaccuracies.TestProcedureAccuracyBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov54PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov55PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureProposedPercentageDistributionofShipmentsbyMarketChannelSelf‐Contained*Equipment%NewandReplacementConstructionNationalAccountDistributorContractor303535RemoteCondensingEquipment%NewandReplacementConstructionNationalAccountDistributorContractor701515*Self‐ContainedequipmentincludesIce‐MakingHeadandSelf‐Contained asdefinedbyEPACT2005,andFlakeandNuggetanalogues.RemoteCondensingincludesallotherequipmenttypes.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov56PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureTypesofMarkupsinDistributionChain•BaselineMarkups:–Markupsrelateconsumerpricetocostofgoodssold(CGS).–Baselinemarkupsrelatepricetocostpriortoachangeinefficiency.–Baselinemarkupsindicateaconsumerpricethatcoversallofadistributor’sorcontractor’sexpensesplusprofit.•IncrementalMarkups:–IncrementalmarkupsrelatetheincrementalchangeinconsumerpricetotheincrementalchangeinCGS.–Certaincosts,suchasdirectlaborcosts(salaries,payroll,rentalandoccupancy),donotvarywithefficiencyinducedchangesinCGSandremainconstantinthecalculationofincrementalmarkups.–IncrementalmarkupscoveronlyexpensesthatvarywithCGS−inthiscase,expensesthatincreaseduetoanincreaseinequipmentefficiency.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov57PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem7‐1DOErequestsinformationontheproposeddistributionchannelsforthecommercialice‐makingequipmentcoveredunderthisrulemaking.Item7‐2DOErequestsinformationonwhetherthedistributionchannelsdifferbythetypesofbuildingsthatcomprisethemarketforautomaticcommercialice‐makers,namely,foodsalesestablishments,foodserviceestablishments,healthcarefacilities,lodgingfacilities,andothers.Item7‐3DOErequestsfeedbackonitsproposaltouseincrementaldistributionchannelmarkupsfortheLCCanalysis.Item7‐4DOEseekscommentonsourcesoffoodserviceequipmentdistributionchaindatathatcouldbeusedtocharacterizemarkupsforthefoodserviceequipmentindustry.Item7‐5DOEseekscommentonappropriatetransportationandshippingcoststoincludeintheanalysisandwhetherthosecostsarelikelytovaryforhigher‐efficiencyequipment.RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov58PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov59PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureEnergyUseCharacterization•Analyzeenergyandwateruseandend‐useloadcharacterizationtoassesstheenergyandwatersavingspotentialofdifferentequipmentefficiencies.•Providethebasisfortheunitenergycostsusedinthelife‐cyclecostanalysis.Issues•Assumptionsregardingthedistribution,bothbynumberandtypeoficemakerbybuildingoccupancytype•Therelationshipbetweenbuildingoccupancytypeandutilizationfactor•Energyuseimpactsofutilizationfactorsandresultingdown‐cycling•ImpactofindoormachinesonheatingandcoolingloadsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov60PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureCurrentUseandUtilizationFactorAssumptionsBuildingTypeUtilization Factor(DutyCycle)PercentRemoteCondensingUnitsEducation.5TBDFoodSales.5TBDFoodService.5TBDHealthCare.5TBDLodging.5TBDRetail.5TBDOffice.5TBDBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov61PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem6‐1DOEseeksdataordatasourcesthatcouldbeusedtocharacterizetheenergyuseofautomaticcommercialice‐makingequipment.Item6‐2DOEseeksfeedbackontheassumptionthatcommercialice‐makingmachineoperationhasanegligibleimpactonthebuildingspace‐conditioningloads.Additional CommentO–DOEseeksconfirmationofnumberofequipmentbybuildingtype,asshownonthepreviousslideAdditionalCommentP–DOEseeksconfirmationofcurrentutilizationfactorsasisshownonthepreviousslide,orifitvariesbybuildingtype,andifthatfactorcapturesbothpercentageoftotaluseanddown‐cycling,orwhetherthosearetwodifferentfactors.RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov62PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov63PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureLife‐CycleCost(LCC)andPaybackPeriod(PBP)Analysis•AssessthenetLCCandPBPfordifferentefficiencylevels.Analysis•LCCequalsconsumerpriceplusthesumofannualoperatingcostsdiscountedtoaparticularbaseyear.•Economicevaluationperformedfromtheconsumerperspective.•AnalysisimplementedinanExcelspreadsheet.•ResultsexpressedasLCCdifference(baselineminusstandardlevel).•Simplepaybackequalstheincrementalfirstcostdividedbytheoperatingcostsavingsfor1year.ConsumerLife‐CycleCost(baselineandstandard)LCCImpacts(differencebetweenbaselineandstandard)OperatingCost(sum&discounttopresentvalue)FirstCost(consumerprice&installation)BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov64PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureLCCFlowchartFromEngineeringAnalysis(PriceisaFunctionofEfficiency)FromMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationAnalysisFromEnergyUseCharacterizationAnalysisEnergyandWaterConsumptionPowerandWaterDemandDistributorMarkupSalesTaxMechanicalContractorMarkupConsumerPriceDataInputsIntermediateAnalysisOutputResultsTotalInstalledCostAnnualEnergyExpenseAnnualOperatingExpenseLifetimeOperatingExpensePaybackPeriodLife‐CycleCostElectricityandWaterPricesBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov65PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•DOEproposestodevelopnationwideestimatesofwaterandwastewatercostsandincorporatetheseestimatesintotheannualoperatingcost,LCC,andPBPanalyses.•SourcessuchastheAmericanWaterWorksAssociation’s(AWWA’s)biennialpricesurveyandothersurveysofretailwaterpurveyorswillbecompiledtoestablishbaseyearprices.•DOEanticipatesusingdatafrommultipleyears’surveystoestablishtrendsforpurposesofdevelopingwaterpriceforecasts.Item8‐8DOEseeksinputontheproposedmethodologyfordevelopingestimatesofnationalwatercostsandpotentialsavingsassociatedwiththeproposedrule.WaterPricesBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov66PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•DOEbasesrepaircostsonannualizedcostsofkeycomponentsandfrequencyofreplacementinthefield.•Maintenancecostswillbebasedonestimatesofpreventativemaintenanceandaseparateestimateofmaintenancefordifferentice‐makingtechnologies.•Unlesstheefficiencyincreasesconsideredforthisrulemakingresultinsignificantlylargerorheavierequipment,DOEexpectsthatmore‐efficientautomaticcommercialice‐makingequipmentwillnotincurincreasedinstallationcosts.Installation,Maintenance,andRepairCostsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov67PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem8‐3DOEseeksanswerstothequestion:Whatarethetypicalinstallation,maintenance,andrepaircostsandpracticesduringthelifecycleofanoriginallymanufacturedautomaticcommercialice‐makingmachine?Item8‐4Whatisatypicaltimeperiodbetweenthesaleofanewproductandthefirstmaintenanceorrepairs?Whatarethetypicalcyclesofmaintenanceandrepairs?Item8‐5DOEseeksfeedbackonwhetherandhowroutinemaintenance,repair,andinstallationcostswillchangeforproductsthataremoreenergyandwaterefficient.Item8‐6Ifitisnotappropriatetoassumethatchangesinmaintenance,repair,orinstallationcostswouldbenegligibleformore‐efficientproducts,DOEseeksfeedbackonappropriatemethodologiesforassessingchangestoeachofthesecosts.RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov68PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•Currentresearchshowsanautomaticcommercialice‐makermachinelifetypicallyrangesfrom7to10years,withanaverageof8.5years.•DOEwilluseinformationfromadditionalvariousliteraturesources(e.g.,ApplianceMagazine,handbookspublishedbyASHRAE)andinputfrommanufacturersandotherinterestedpartiestobetterestablishaverageequipmentlifetimesforuseintheLCCandsubsequentanalyses.Item8‐7DOEseekscommentonappropriateequipmentlifetimesfortheclassesofequipmentcoveredinthisrulemaking.EquipmentLifetimesBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov69PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov70PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureShipmentsAnalysis•Estimateproductshipmentsinbasecaseandpotentialneworamendedenergyefficiencystandardsscenarios.Approach•Datasources:AHRI,ApplianceMagazine,USCensusBureau,AEO,NorthAmericanAssociationofFoodEquipmentManufacturers(NAFEM).•Estimatebasecaseforecast– whatwouldtheshipmentsbewithoutneworamendedenergyconservationstandards?•Estimateimpactofstandards– what,ifany,increase/decreaseinshipmentsineachequipmentclasswouldoccurduetonew/amendedenergyconservationstandards?BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov71PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureItem9‐1DOEseeksinformationonhistoricalshipmentsofautomaticcommercialice‐makingequipmentforeachequipmentclasscoveredunderthisrulemaking,aswellasindustry‐trenddataregardingrelativegrowthineachequipmentclass.Item9‐2DOEseeksinformationonrepresentativesaturationratesforeachequipmentclasscoveredunderthisrulemaking,aswellasindustry‐trenddataregardingrelativegrowthineachequipmentclass.Item9‐3DOErequestsinputfrommanufacturersonthepotentialimpactofnewenergyconservationstandardsonequipmentshipments.Otherinterestedpartiesarealsowelcometoprovideinput.DOEalsorequestsinputonanymarket‐pullprogramsthatcurrentlyexisttopromotetheadoptionofmore‐efficientequipment.RequestforCommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov72PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov73PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNationalImpactAnalysis(NIA)•Estimatenationalenergysavings(NES),nationalwatersavings,andnationalnetpresentvalue(NPV)ofconsumersavingsforhigher‐efficiencystandardlevels.Analysis•Reboundeffectisassumedtonotapplytothisrulemakingbecause,usually,automaticcommercialicemachinesarepresumedtoruncontinuously,andoperatingsettingsarebasedontheamountoficetobeproduced.•NESspreadsheetswillbeusedforcalculationofNESandNPVofconsumersavings.BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov74PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•NationalEnergyandWaterSavings:–Comparenationalenergyandwaterconsumptionofbasecaseandhigher‐efficiencyequipment– year‐by‐yearcalculations.–Site‐to‐sourceconversionfactorsaccountforenergylossesingeneration,transmission,anddistributionofelectricity– fromEIA’sNationalEnergyModelingSystem(NEMS).•NPVofconsumersavingswillbecalculated,asperOMBguidance,withtwodifferentdiscountrates:3%and7%.Item10‐1DOErequestsinformationonwhetherareboundeffectexistsandshouldbeincorporatedintheNIA.Item10‐2DOEwelcomescommentsfrominterestedpartiesontheuseofNIAspreadsheetmodelsforestimatingnationalimpactsofamendedenergyandwaterconservationstandardsforautomaticcommercialice‐makingequipment.NationalImpactAnalysis(cont.)BuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov75PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRulePreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov76PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedure•TheMIAconsistsofthreemainphases:IndustryprofileDevelopstraw‐manGRIMDevelopinterviewguideInterviews&industry‐wide/subgroupanalysesAssessdirectemployment,competition,cumulativeburdenPhase2Phase3PreliminaryMIAInterviewsPhase1PreliminaryAnalysisNOPRItem12‐1DOEseekscommentontheestablishmentofmanufacturersubgroupsforautomaticcommercialice‐makingequipment,particularlysmallbusinessesandnichemanufacturers.Item12‐2WhatregulationsorpendingregulationsshouldDOEconsiderintheanalysisofcumulativeregulatoryburden?PreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysisBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov77PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverview&Framework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov78NOPRAnalysesManufacturerImpactAnalysisUtilityImpactAnalysisEmploymentImpactAnalysisLife‐CycleCostSubgroupAnalysisEnvironmentalAssessmentRegulatoryImpactAnalysisLife‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysesNationalImpactAnalysisRevisePreliminaryAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleNOPR Process StepsBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov79NOPRAnalysesItem12‐1DOEseekscommentontheestablishmentofmanufacturersubgroupsforautomaticcommercialice‐makingequipment,particularlysmallbusinessesandnichemanufacturers.Item12‐2WhatregulationsorpendingregulationsshouldDOEconsiderintheanalysisofcumulativeregulatoryburden?Item13‐1DOEseeksinputfrominterestedpartiesonitsproposeduseofNEMS‐BTtoconducttheutilityimpactanalysis.Item13‐2DOEseeksinputonmethodologyofassessingtheoverallimpactonthewaterutilityindustry.Item14‐1DOErequestsfeedbackonthisapproachtoemploymentimpactanalysis.Item15‐1DOEseeksinputonitsplanstouseNEMS‐BTtoconducttheenvironmentalimpactanalysisontheequipmentcoveredbythisrulemaking.DOEisparticularlyinterestedinwhetherthereareanyotherapproachestotheenvironmentalassessmentthatitshouldconsiderandtheadvantagesanddisadvantagesforeachapproach.Request for CommentBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov80PreliminaryAnalysis&TestProcedureNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)AnalysesClosing Remarks, Contacts & InformationPublicMeetingSlidesTopics567RegulatoryHistory2RulemakingOverview&Framework41Introduction3ScopeBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov81Pleasereferenceallcorrespondenceforthisrulemakingwiththefollowinginformation:–AutomaticCommercialIce‐MakerRulemaking–DocketNumberEERE‐2010‐BT‐STD‐0037–RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN)1904‐AC39Email:ACIM‐2010‐STD‐0037@ee.doe.govCommentperiodends:January18,2011ClosingRemarks,Contacts&InformationPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgramMailstop:EE‐2J,Room1J‐0181000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,6thFloor950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202‐586‐2945ACIM Comment Submittal InformationBuildingTechnologiesProgrameere.energy.gov82•DOEApplianceStandards–http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/•AutomaticCommercialIce‐MakerRulemaking–http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/automatic_ice_making_equipment.html•ContactCharlesLlenza,ProjectManager,fromtheApplianceStandardsProgramforadditionalinformation:–Charles.Llenza@ee.doe.gov–202.586.2192•ContactJohnCymbalsky,Supervisor,fromtheApplianceStandardsProgramforadditionalinformation:–John.Cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov–202.287.1692ClosingRemarks,Contacts&InformationACIM WebPages and DOE Contacts