alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 286.40 May a Tribe use the Tribal Family Assistance Grant to fund IDAs ? ( a ) If the Tribe elects to operate an IDA program, it may use Federal TANF funds or WtW funds to fund IDAs for individuals who are eligible for TANF assistance and may exercise flexibility within the limits of Federal regulations and the statute.
( b ) The following restrictions apply to IDA funds: ( 1 ) A recipient may deposit only earned income into an IDA.
( 2 ) A recipient's contributions to an IDA may be matched by, or through, a qualified entity.
( 3 ) A recipient may withdraw funds only for the following reasons: ( i ) To cover post-secondary education expenses, if the amount is paid directly to an eligible educational institution;
( ii ) For the recipient to purchase a first home, if the amount is paid directly to the person to whom the amounts are due and it is a qualified acquisition cost for a qualified principal residence by a qualified first-time buyer; or
( iii ) For business capitalization, if the amounts are paid directly to a business capitalization account in a federally insured financial institution and used for a qualified business capitalization expense.
( c ) To prevent recipients from withdrawing funds held in an IDA improperly, Tribes may do the following: ( 1 ) Count withdrawals as earned income in the month of withdrawal, unless already counted as income,
( 2 ) Count withdrawals as resources in determining eligibility, or
( 3 ) Take such other steps as the Tribe has established in its Tribal plan or written Tribal policies to deter inappropriate use.
Document

        Exhibit 10.1

270 Brannan Street, San Francisco, CA 94107





May 7, 2020


Doug Merritt
c/o Splunk Inc.
270 Brannan Street
San Francisco, CA 94107


Dear Doug:


You previously entered into an offer letter with Splunk Inc. (the “Company”) dated November 16, 2015, as amended on June 4, 2019 (the “Offer Letter”) that provided for certain severance benefits pursuant to Section 7 and the other terms therein. 


This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) amends and replaces Section 9(c) of the Offer Letter with the below, effective as of April 24, 2020.


“(c)    Good Reason. For purposes of this Agreement, “Good Reason” means any of the following taken without your written consent and provided (a) the Company receives, within thirty (30) days following the occurrence of any of the events set forth in clauses (i) through (iv) below, written notice from you specifying the specific basis for your belief that you are entitled to terminate employment for Good Reason, (b) the Company fails to cure the event constituting Good Reason within thirty (30) days after receipt of such written notice thereof, and (c) you terminate employment within thirty (30) days following expiration of such cure period: (i) a material change, adverse to you, in your position, titles, offices or duties, including, for avoidance of doubt, if following a Change in Control you are not the chief executive officer of a publicly traded company that is the ultimate parent entity of the acquirer; (ii) an assignment of any significant duties to you that are inconsistent with your positions or offices held under this Agreement; (iii) a decrease in your then-current annual base salary by more than 10% (other than in connection with a general decrease in the salary of all executives); or (iv) the relocation of you to a facility or a location more than thirty (30) miles from your then-current residence.”


This Agreement does not change the at-will nature of your employment relationship with the Company, and the terms and conditions of the Offer Letter will continue in full force and effect, except as amended by this Agreement.


Best,




Kristen Robinson
Chief People Officer
Splunk Inc.


I have read, understand, and agree to each of the terms and conditions set forth above. I further acknowledge that no promises or commitments have been made to me except as specifically set forth herein.


									
	/s/ Doug Merritt		May 14, 2020
	Signature of Doug Merritt
		Date
§ 2507.5 Records available on agency website. ( a ) AmeriCorps regularly updates and posts the following on its public website, *americorps.gov*: ( 1 ) Information that is required to be published in the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1) and:
( 2 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect any member of the public.
( 3 ) Statements of policy and interpretation adopted by AmeriCorps and not published in the Federal Register.
( 4 ) Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of administrative cases.
( 5 ) Records that AmeriCorps determines are or will be the subject of widespread media, historical, or academic interest and that may properly be publicly posted.
( b ) On the FOIA page of its public website, *americorps.gov*, the Agency posts records that are required by the FOIA to be made available for public inspection and copying under 5 U.S.C 552(a)(2), including, but not limited to, frequently requested records.
( c ) For help from the FOIA Officer or the FOIA Public Liaison in finding proactively disclosed records, members of the public may contact AmeriCorps at *foia@cns.gov* or at: AmeriCorps, Office of the General Counsel, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20525.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,327
<SECURITIES>                                    56,166
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (459)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,957
<PP&E>                                         116,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (27,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,972
<BONDS>                                        258,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                     (81,972)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,729
<SALES>                                         34,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,241
<CGS>                                           34,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,366)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,366)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,366)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.10)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.10)
<FN>
<F1>EPS-PRIMARY REFERS TO BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE, AS DEFINED IN STATEMENT OF
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE."
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council; Notice 
of Meeting.

SUMMARY: Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council meetings 
will convene in Stayton, Oregon on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 and 
March 28, 2007. These meetings are scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m., and 
will conclude at approximately 8:30 p.m. Meetings will be held in the 
South Room of the Stayton Community Center located on 400 West Virginia 
Street in Stayton, Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Pub. L. 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of thirteen members 
representing state, county and city governments, and representatives of 
various organizations, which include the mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. Tentative agenda items include: Subcommittees reports and 
recommendations, and Three Pools Site Rehabilitation Project Update.
    A direct public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 
8 p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to scheduled meetings by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Paul Matter at the address 
given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Paul Matter; Willamette 
National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, Mill City, OR 
97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: December 15, 2006.
Dallas J. Emch,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9820 Filed 12-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# Re **gional Geology Ov er**  **view**

**Bedr ock of**  **New Yo**  **rk, New Jer se**  **y, &**  **Puert o Ric**  **o**

**EP A**  **Re gion II**  **Fr actured R**  **ock T ra**  **ining January 14, 2014**  **Pierr e Lacombe** 

# St **ate /R**  **egional Geologic Maps**   

## R **egional time**  **units maps eg**  **. Silurian, T riassic**   

## R **egional ro**  **ck/time units**  **maps eg**  **. Sandstone,**  **gneiss** 

# Site Hydr ogeologic Ma ps and Sections
• Sho w ro ck strata • Sho w geoph ysical strata • Sho w w eathering induce hy dorgeologic changes **2 Regional Geology Overview** **Regional Geology Overview 3** **4 Regional Geology Overview**  Adirondack Mtn Metamorphic (0 NPL)

Allegheny Plateau and Catskill Mountains

Devonian (25 NPL) Lake Ontario Lowlands Silurian (25 NPL) Saint Lawrence Champlain Lowlands Cambrian to Silurian (6 NPL)

Hudson Lowlands Ta conic Mts Cambrian to Silurian

(12 NPL)

Highlands Metamorphic (12 NPL) Geology in Random Order**5 Regional Geology Overview** **6 Regional Geology Overview** 

### New Jersey 3 Fr actured Bedrock Physiogr aphic Provinces **Time** Str atigr aphic Units Precambrian to Jur assic EP A NPL Sites Va lley and Ridge 0 Highlands 13 Piedmont 50+ Ringwood

Fa ir Lawn

NA WC 

# Re gional Geology**8 Regional Geology Overview**  Glacial Cover Glacial Cover 

# Re gional Geology Bedrock Geology hidden by **glacial** cover and **urban** cover**9 Regional Geology Overview**  North Sedimentary (X NPL)
Centr al Sedimentary

, Igneous (X NPL)

South Sedimentary (X NPL)

16 NPL Sites

# Major **NJ NY PR R ock T**  **ypes** Sedimen ta ry • Shale • Silts to ne • Sands to ne • Conglomer ate • Limes to ne • Man y mor e 

# Met amorphic

• Gneiss • Schis t • Slate • Marble • Man y mor e 

# Igneous

• Gr anite • Basalt • Diabase • Anorthosite • Man y mor e Most time ar e r ock formations or units ar e made out of interla ye re d strata or inter calated masses the abo ve r ock types **10**

**Regional Geology Overview 11**  **Regional Geology Overview ERA**  **Pe riod**  **Epochs NY**  **and NJ Bedr ocks**  **PR Rocks** Cenozoic Quaternar y Holocene
none Carbonates Pleistocene Te rt iar y Pliocene

Miocene Oligocene Eocene Vo lcanic & Plutonic Rocks PaleoceneMesozoic Cr etaceous none Ju rassic Palasades and Wa satch Mt Tr iassic Newark BasinPaleozoic Pe rmian none Pe nnsylvanian we stern Alleghen y Plateau nearly none Mississippian Dev onian Alleghen y Plateau & Catskill Mtns NJ Va lley and Ridge Silurian Hudson lowlands & Ta conic mountain Lak e Ontario & Champlain Lowlands Ordovician CambrianPreCambrian Pr oter ozoic Adir ondacks MTS NY Highlands Ar chean none **Time Units Provence** 

###  

# St **ate Geologic maps**  **ar e:** 

 

## G **ro ss scale**   

## Geologic **Time/Gr oup**  **maps**  

# Coun **ty and L**  **oc al**  **ge ologic**  **maps ar**  **e**  

## Medium scale  

## Geologic **Fo rma**  **tion maps**  

# Sit **e maps should**  **be:**  

## F **ine scale**  

## Ro **ck s tr**  **ata maps of man**  **y types** 

# Summary

**Regional Geology Overview 12**
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement Rulemaking Docket S UBJECT : Meeting wi th Portland Cement Association and Cement Industry Representatives to discuss their concerns on the Final Portland Cement NESHAP and NSPS LOCATION : US Environmental Protection Agency , 1220 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington

DC 20460 D ATE OF MEETING : December 16 , 2010 Participants: Portland Cement Association (PCA ) And Cement Industry Counsels Bryan Brendle , PCA Jon Jewett, GCHI Dick Stoll, Foley

& Lardner, LLP Debra Jezouit, Baker B otts, LLP Roger Martella, Sidley

Austin, LL P Jas o n Morin, Hol c im (by phone) U.S. E nvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Gina McCarth y Joe Goffman Janet McCabe Peter Tsirigotis (b y phone) Steve Silverman Keith Barnett (b y phone)

The Portland Cement Ass ociation (PCA) met with EPA to discuss the issues laid out in their letter of December 3, 2010 (attached).
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) All-20 

Audit Division Recommendation } Agenda Document No. 15-11-A 

Memorandum on the South Dakota ) 

Democratic Party (SDDP) ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on March 10,2015 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in 

the above-captioned matter: 

1. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Approve Finding 1 (Misstatement of Financial Activity), Finding 3 (Reporting 

of Coordinated Party Expenditures), Finding 4 (Contributions from Unregistered 

Political Organizations), and Finding 5 (Disclosure of Occupation/Name of 

Employer) as set forth in Agenda Document No. 15-11-A. 

Commissioners Goodman, Huiiter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

2. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to: 

Approve Finding 2 (Recordkeeping for Employees) as set forth in Agenda 

Document No. 15-11-A subject to an amendment to include the $17,770 

paid to contract workers. 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen dissented. 

3. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

a. Approve Finding 2 (Recordkeeping for Employees) as set forth in 

Agenda Document No. 15-11-A related to the $42,557 that the 

committee disclosed as having been paid with an ^location of 

federal and non-federal funds and $2,399 that was paid from an 

exclusively non-federal account during the periods in which the 

employee was also paid with federal funds. 
Federal Election Commission Page 2 

Certification for Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on the South Dakota Democratic Party (SDDP) 

March 10,2015 

b. Direct the Audit Division to include in the Proposed Final Audit 

Report an Additional Issues section addressing the $15,187 for 

100% non-federal payments. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

alfiimatively for the decision. 

Attest; 

^~ThAtUll, 

Date Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Cbmmission
§ 265.1 What does this part cover? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 53876 , June 28, 2024.
( a ) This part explains how we will collect the information required by section 411(a) of the Act (data collection and reporting); the information required to implement section 407 of the Act (work participation requirements), as authorized by section 411(a)(1)(A)(xii); the information required to implement section 409 (penalties), section 403 (grants to States), section 405 (administrative provisions), section 411(b) (report to Congress), and section 413 (annual rankings of State TANF programs); and the data necessary to carry out our financial management and oversight responsibilities.
( b ) This part describes the information in the quarterly and annual reports that each State must file, as follows:[1] ( 1 ) The case record information (disaggregated and aggregated) on individuals and families in the quarterly TANF Data Report;
( 2 ) The expenditure data in the quarterly TANF Financial Report (or, as applicable, the Territorial Financial Report); and
( 3 ) The definitions and other information on the State's TANF and MOE programs that must be filed annually.
( c ) If a State claims MOE expenditures under a separate State program(s), this part describes the case record information (disaggregated and aggregated) on individuals and families in the quarterly SSP-MOE Data Report that each State must file.
( d ) This part describes when reports are due, how we will determine if reporting requirements have been met, and how we will apply the statutory penalty for failure to file a timely report. It also specifies electronic filing and sampling requirements.
[64 FR 17900, Apr. 12, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 37482, June 29, 2006] Footnotes -
265.1
[1] The Appendices contain the specific data elements in the quarterly Data Report, the quarterly Financial Report, and the Annual Report on State MOE Programs, as well as the instructions for filing these reports. They also include the form and instructions for the Caseload Reduction Report described at § 261.41(b) of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of First Citizens Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Charles M. Buckner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, W. Bryan Hendrix, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/S/ W. Bryan Hendrix
W. Bryan Hendrix, Senior Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer | /S/ Charles M. Buckner
Charles M. Buckner, President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2007.                                                                     | Date: April 13, 2007.
[Crim. No. 3391.

Second Appellate District, Division One.

October 10, 1940.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CAROLINE SEPULVEDA, Appellant.

Lewis A. Schaffer for Appellant.

Earl AVarren, Attorney-General, and L. G. Campbell, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

*99DORAN, J.

Under the heading "Grounds for this Appeal” appellant’s opening brief contains the following: "This appeal from the order revoking probation and from the judgment sentencing appellant to imprisonment in the state prison is predicated upon the following premises”; then follows the seven so-called "premises” which in substance set forth that the "imposition of sentence of imprisonment upon appellant in the state prison was void”, and that "no competent legal evidence had been brought before the court to support the allegations that served as the basis for revocation of probation”.

The record reveals that on August 29, 1938, appellant had pleaded guilty to one count of an information alleging the commission of four offenses of issuing worthless checks. After a hearing, further proceedings were suspended and probation was granted, the term thereof fixed at three years with the added condition that the defendant serve three months in the county jail. May 6, 1940, the above-mentioned order was revoked and, following a hearing, judgment was pronounced confining the defendant in the Women’s Institution at Tehachapi for the term prescribed by law.

The record further reveals the notice of appeal to be as follows: "You, and each of you, will please take notice that the defendant above-named, Caroline Sepulveda, appeals from the *order revolting probation*and the *sentence*thereon, which said Order was duly made on the 7th day of July, 1940, in Department 41 of the above-entitled Court, the Honorable Frank G. Swain, Judge Presiding. Dated: July 10th, 1940. Lewis A. Schaffer, Attorney for Appellant.” (Italics added.) It will be seen from the above notice that there is no appeal herein from'the judgment, appellant’s brief to the contrary notwithstanding.

The law makes no provision for an appeal from an order revoking probation made before judgment, nor is there any appeal from a sentence. Section 1237 of the Penal Code sets forth the decisions from which a defendant may appeal in a criminal action, and reads as follows: "An appeal may be taken by the defendant: 1. From a final judgment of conviction ; 2. From an order denying a motion for a new trial; 3. From any order made after judgment, affecting the substantial rights of the party.” The order here in question was made before judgment and is not appealable and the *100above-quoted provisions of the Penal Code immediately reveal the lack of a right of appeal from a sentence in any event. Though appellant’s opening brief refers to an appeal from a judgment sentencing appellant to imprisonment, all points raised and arguments advanced are addressed solely to the order revoking probation and the sentence imposed. It is clear that this appeal is of the character denominated in appellant’s notice of appeal above quoted.

For the foregoing reasons the appeal is dismissed.

York, P. J., and White, J., concurred.