alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 30.27 Mutual release of the debtor and the Government.

In all appropriate instances, a compromise that is accepted by the Secretary will be implemented by means of a mutual release. The terms of such mutual release shall provide that the debtor is released from further non-tax liability on the compromised debt in consideration of payment in full of the compromise amount and the Government and its officials, past and present, are released and discharged from any and all claims and causes of action arising from the same transaction that the debtor may have. In the event a mutual release is not executed when a debt is compromised, unless prohibited by law, the debtor is still deemed to have waived any and all claims and causes of action against the Government and its officials related to the transaction giving rise to the compromised debt.
§ 286.130 Does the receipt of Welfare-to-Work (WtW) cash assistance count towards a Tribe's TANF time limit? ( a ) For purposes of an individual's time limit for receipt of TANF assistance as well as the penalty provision at § 286.195(a)(1), WtW cash assistance counts towards a Tribe's TANF time limit only if: ( 1 ) Such assistance satisfies the definition at § 286.10; and
( 2 ) Is directed at ongoing basic needs.
( b ) Only cash assistance provided in the form of cash payments, checks, reimbursements, electronic funds transfers, or any other form that can legally be converted to currency is subject to paragraph (a) of this section.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 08-5422 September Term, 2009

 FILED ON: SEPTEMBER 18, 2009

EMILY'S LIST,

APPELLANT

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

APPELLEE

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:05-cv-00049-CKK)

Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this

cause be reversed, and the case be remanded to the District Court with instructions to enter

judgment for Emily’s List and to vacate the challenged regulations, in accordance with the opinion

of the court filed herein this date.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail

Deputy Clerk

Date: September 18, 2009

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh, with whom Circuit Judge Henderson joins,

and with whom Circuit Judge Brown joins as to Part IV except footnotes 17, 18, and 20.

Opinion concurring in part filed by Circuit Judge Brown.

Case: 08-5422 Document: 1206886 Filed: 09/18/2009 Page: 1
#### § 400.202 Extent of Federal funding.

Subject to the availability of funds and under the terms and conditions approved by the Director, FF will be provided for 100 percent of authorized allowable costs of determining eligibility and providing assistance and services in accordance with this part.
R£: reminder to respond to the Oklahoma Democratic Party DFAR 

Neil P. Reiif 

to: 

CCrussiah@fec.gov, donna@okdemocrats.org, matt@mdlangley.com 

11/05/2015 04:53 PM 

Cc: 

"rlmorcomb@fec.gov" 

Hide Details 

From: "Neil P. Reiff' <reiff@sandlerreifF.com> 

To: "CCrussiah@fec.gov" <CCrussiah@fec.gov>, "donna@okdemocrats.org" 

<donna@okdemocrats.org>, "matt@mdlangley.com" <matt@mdlangley.com>, 

Cc: "rlmorcomb@fec.gov" <rlmorcomb@fec.gov> 

Please consider this email our response to the DFAR. First, we do not request a hearing on any issues raised in 

the DFAR. Second, the committee has completed the filing of amendments today that have fully resolved the 

issues related to the Levin schedules, as well as the disclosure of payroll expenses. Please let us know if you 

have any other questions or concerns. 

Neil P. Reiff 

Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein a Birkenstock, P.C. 

1025 Vermont Ave, NW 

Suite 300 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

w. (202)479- 1111 

f. (202)479- 1115 

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 

information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not 

the intended recipient or any employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended 

recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email. 

Thank you for your cooperation. 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that 

any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or 

written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue 

Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed 

herein.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9931]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Meeting


ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 11th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., app.) The American Health Information 
Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to 
achieve a common interoperability framework for health information 
technology (IT).

DATES: January 23, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will include presentations by 
the Consumer Empowerment, Biosurveillance, Confidentiality, Privacy and 
Security, and Quality Workgroups on their Recommendations and also a 
demonstration of prototypes of the Nationwide Health Information 
Network (NHIN).
    A Web site of the Community meeting will be available on the NIH 
Web site at: http://ww.videocast.nih.gov/.
    If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 
690-7151.

    Dated: December 19, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-9931 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **111 9** 

ADDIE D. CAMPBELL , P laintiff

– Appell ant ,

v.
CHESTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT , Defendant

– Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist rict of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 0 : 0 9

- c v - 0 0 41 1

- CM C )

Submitted : July 29, 2011 Decided: September 15, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Addie D. Campbell , Appellant Pro Se
. Jasmine Rogers Drain, Allen Dean Smith, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Addie D. Campbell appeals the distr ict court ’ s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting summary judgment for Defendant i n this employment discrimination action

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Campbell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Campbell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Moreover, to the extent Campbell seeks to raise new claims on appeal, those clai ms are foreclosed by her failure to raise them in the district court. Finally, to the extent Campbell seeks to raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of effective assistance does not apply to civil actions.

Acco rdingly , we affirm the district court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 152.39 Maintenance of effort. ( a ) *General.* A State that enters into a contract with HHS under this part must demonstrate, subject to approval by HHS, that it will continue to provide funding of any existing high risk pool in the State at a level that is not reduced from the amount provided for in the year prior to the year in which the contract is entered.
( b ) *Failure to maintain efforts.* In situations where a State enters into a contract with HHS under this part, HHS shall take appropriate action, such as terminating the PCIP contract, against any State that fails to maintain funding levels for existing State high risk pools as required, and approved by HHS, under paragraph (a) of this section.
Zuzana O. 

Pacious

Digitally signed by Zuzana O. 

Pacious 

DN: cn=Zuzana O. Pacious, o, 

ou, email=zpacious@fec.gov, 

c=US 

Date: 2016.11.15 14:17:44 

-05'00'

Nilda B. 

Clemente

Digitally signed by Nilda B. Clemente 

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, 

ou=Department of the Treasury, 

ou=Bureau of the Fiscal Service, 

ou=People, serialNumber=451390, 

cn=Nilda B. Clemente 

Date: 2016.11.15 14:26:37 -05'00'
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.15 Reports and maintenance of records. The State plan shall provide that: ( a ) The IV-D agency will maintain records necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the plan, including records regarding: ( 1 ) Applications pursuant to § 302.33 for support services available under the State plan;
( 2 ) Location of noncustodial parents, actions to establish paternity and obtain and enforce support, and the costs incurred in such actions;
( 3 ) Amount and sources of support collections and the distribution of these collections;
( 4 ) Any fees charged or paid for support enforcement services;
( 5 ) Any other administrative costs;
( 6 ) Any other information required by the Office;
( 7 ) Statistical, fiscal, and other records necessary for reporting and accountability required by the Secretary; and
( 8 ) The retention and custodial requirements for the records in this section are prescribed in 45 CFR 75.361 through 75.370.
( b ) The IV-D agency will make such reports in such form and containing such information, as the Secretary may from time to time require, and comply with such provisions as he may from time to time find necessary to assure the correctness and verification of such reports.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0960-0154, 0960-0226 and 0960-0238) [40 FR 27159, June 26, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 57281, Dec. 23, 1982; 48 FR 51917, Nov. 15, 1983; 51 FR 37731, Oct. 24, 1986; 61 FR 67240, Dec. 20, 1996; 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016; 81 FR 93561, Dec. 20, 2016]
§ 2551.43 What income guidelines govern eligibility to serve as a stipended Senior Companion? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70541 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) To receive a stipend, a Senior Companion may not have an annual income from all sources, after deducting allowable medical expenses, which exceeds the program's income eligibility guideline for the State in which he or she resides. The income eligibility guideline for each State is 200 percent of the poverty line, as set forth in 42 U.S.C. 9902 (2).
( b ) For applicants to become stipended Senior Companions, annual income is projected for the following 12 months, based on income at the time of application. For serving stipended Senior Companions, annual income is counted for the past 12 months. Annual income includes the applicant or enrollee's income and that of his/her spouse, if the spouse lives in the same residence.
( c ) Allowable medical expenses are annual out-of-pocket medical expenses for health insurance premiums, health care services, and medications provided to the applicant, enrollee, or spouse which were not and will not be paid by Medicare, Medicaid, other insurance, or other third party payor, and which do not exceed 50 percent of the applicable income guideline.
( d ) Applicants whose income is not more than 100 percent of the poverty line shall be given special consideration for enrollment.
( e ) Once enrolled, a Senior Companion shall remain eligible to serve and to receive a stipend so long as his or her income, does not exceed the applicable income eligibility guideline by 20 percent.
[64 FR 14115, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 60998, Sept. 27, 2002; 69 FR 20830, Apr. 19, 2004; Redesignated at 72 FR 48584, Aug. 24, 2007; 74 FR 46508, Sept. 10, 2009; 83 FR 64646, Dec. 17, 2018]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0132

_________________

BRYCE EVERETT PETERSON,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Bryce Everett Peterson, to all 

counsel of record and to the Honorable Howard F. Recht, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 26 2021

05/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0132
#### § 2519.720 What is the length of a grant?

A grant under this part is for a period of up to three years, subject to satisfactory performance and annual appropriations.
#### § 410.1702 Conducting age determinations.

Procedures for determining the age of an individual must take into account the totality of the circumstances and evidence, including the non-exclusive use of radiographs, to determine the age of the individual. ORR may require an individual in ORR custody to submit to a medical or dental examination, including X-rays, conducted by a medical professional or to submit to other appropriate procedures to verify their age. If ORR subsequently determines that such an individual is an unaccompanied child, the individual will be treated in accordance with ORR's UC Program regulations in this part for all purposes.
§ 1643.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Assisted suicide* means the provision of any means to another person with the intent of enabling or assisting that person to commit suicide.
( b ) *Euthanasia (or mercy killing)* is the use of active means by one person to cause the death of another person for reasons assumed to be merciful, regardless of whether the person killed consents to be killed.
( c ) *Suicide* means the act or instance of taking one's own life voluntarily and intentionally.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COM. EX REL. GREGORY STOVER,

Petitioner

v.

PRESIDENT JUDGE SHEILA WOODSSKIPPER, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 64 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 24, 2012



/s/ Din Dayal JalanName: Din Dayal JalanTitle: Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and is not being filed either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
§ 155.1322 Pass-through funding for approved waivers. ( a ) *Pass-through funding.* With respect to a State's approved section 1332 waiver, under which, due to the structure of the approved State waiver plan, individuals and small employers in the State would not qualify for or would qualify for a reduced amount of premium tax credit under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code, small business tax credit under section 45R of the Internal Revenue Code, or cost-sharing reductions under ACA part I of subtitle E for which they would otherwise be eligible, the Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury shall provide for an alternative means by which the aggregate amount of such credits or reductions that would have been paid on behalf of participants in the Exchanges had the State not received such waiver shall be paid to the State for purposes of implementing the approved State waiver plan. Such amount shall be determined annually by the Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the experience of other States with respect to participation in an Exchange and credits and reductions provided under such provisions to residents of the other States. This amount can be updated to reflect applicable changes in Federal or State law.
( b ) [Reserved]
[86 FR 53505, Sept. 27, 2021]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Federal Election Commission CIVIL 

VERSUS 21-346-BAJ-SDJ

Defend Louisiana PAC et al 

CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Service having been executed on Defendants, Defend Louisiana PAC and Taylor 

Townsend on July 13th , 2021, and no answer, claim or other responsive pleadings having been 

filed; 

IT IS ORDERED the Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default against, Defendants, Defend 

Louisiana PAC and Taylor Townsend be and is hereby GRANTED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 13th day of August 2021. 

MICHAEL L. MCCONNELL

CLERK OF COURT

BY: _______________________ 

Deputy Clerk 

cc: Defend Louisiana PAC 

P.O. Box44313 

Baton Rouge, LA 70804 

Taylor Townsend 

320 St. Denis Street 

Natichitoches, LA 71457 

S 

Case 3:21-cv-00346-BAJ-SDJ Document 9 08/13/21 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 302.1 Definitions.

The definitions found in § 301.1 of this chapter also are applicable to this part.
#### § 261.13 May an individual be penalized for not following an individual responsibility plan?

Yes. If an individual fails without good cause to comply with an individual responsibility plan that he or she has signed, the State may reduce the amount of assistance otherwise payable to the family, by whatever amount it considers appropriate. This penalty is in addition to any other penalties under the State's TANF program.
Exhibit 13.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended
March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
Vinod BhandawatName:
    Vinod BhandawatTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-7 Trustfor the 2006 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                     /s/ H. John Berens

| ___________________________________________Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|