alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1800.6 Request for correction or amendment to the record.

The individual should submit a request to the Deputy Executive Secretary of the Foundation which states the individual's desire to correct or to amend his or her record. This request is to be made in accord with the provisions of § 1800.4.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00093

- CV

PEREZ HILTON MANAGEMENT, INC.

, D/B/A PEREZITOS.COM, Appellant

V.

KRISTINA HEAD

, A/K/A KRISTINA ROBINSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 0040

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Perez Hilton Management, Inc., d/b/a Perezitos.com, appellant, filed this interlocutory

appeal from the trial court’s denial of its special appearance. Appellant has now filed a motion

with this Court stating that the claims against in it the proceeding below have been dismissed and

seeking to dismiss the appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, the motion is granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

We dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss , III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 19, 2013

Date Decided: December 20, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 2) of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  December 5, 2005                         /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                                -----------------------
                                                Daniel B. O'Brien
                                                Chief Financial Officer





































                                        1
Exhibit 32.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hans Ephraimson, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of DB US Dollar Index Master
Trust (the Master Trust), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Master Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Master Trust.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 25, 2010 |  | /s/ Hans Ephraimson    
|                     |  | Hans Ephraimson        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court cM' Appea!s-D?strict

CATHY S. LUSK

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

2/11/2015

MOORE, DAVINA WILSON Tr. Ct. No. 007-1663-11

On this day, the Appellant's motion for rehearing has been denied.

FILE COPY

PD-1045-14

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
#### Higbie v. Heath *et al.,*appellants.

*Interest—compound interest—rules for computing—certificate annexed to case.*

The court will not enforce a contract for the payment of compound interest; but if the debtor pays it voluntarily, it cannot be recovered back. *Mowry*v. *Bishop,*5 Paige, 98.

When there is no certificate annexed to a case, stating that the latter contains the whole evidence, the court cannot say that a particular finding is not supported by the evidence. On the contrary, it must find that it is.

Appeal by the defendant Moses Petrie from a judgment entered upon the findings of the judge before whom the action was tried without a jury.

The action was brought by William Higbie against Gaylord Heath and others, to foreclose a mortgage originally given to executors, and assigned to the plaintiff.

*O. O. Cottle,*for appellant.

*G. W. Smith,*for respondent.

Mullin, P. J.

The points passed upon are given in the head-note, and it is not believed necessary to publish the opinion in full.

*Judgment affirmed upon condition that plaintiff gives stipulation, etc.*
#### § 305.62 Disregard of a failure which is of a technical nature.

A State subject to a penalty under § 305.61(a)(1)(ii) or (iii) of this part may be determined, as appropriate, to have submitted adequate data or to have achieved substantial compliance with one or more IV-D requirements, as defined in § 305.63 of this part, if the Secretary determines that the incompleteness or unreliability of the data, or the noncompliance with one or more of the IV-D requirements, is of a technical nature which does not adversely affect the performance of the State's IV-D program or does not adversely affect the determination of the level of the State's paternity establishment or other performance measures percentages.
§ 262.7 How can a State appeal our decision to take a penalty? ( a ) ( 1 ) We will formally notify the Governor and the State agency of an adverse action (i.e., the reduction in the SFAG) within five days after we determine that a State is subject to a penalty under parts 261 through 265 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Such notice will include the factual and legal basis for taking the penalty in sufficient detail for the State to be able to respond in an appeal.
( b ) ( 1 ) The State may file an appeal of the action, in whole or in part, with the HHS Departmental Appeals Board (the Board) within 60 days after the date it receives notice of the adverse action. The State must submit its brief and supporting documents when it files its appeal.
( 2 ) The State must send a copy of the appeal, and any supplemental filings, to the Office of the General Counsel, Children, Families and Aging Division, Room 411-D, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
( c ) We will submit our reply brief and supporting documentation within 45 days of the receipt of the State's submission under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The State may submit a reply and any supporting documentation within 21 days of its receipt of our reply under paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) The appeal to the Board must follow the provisions of the rules under this section and those at §§ 16.2, 16.9, 16.10, and 16.13-16.22 of this title, to the extent that they are consistent with this section.
( f ) The Board will consider an appeal filed by a State on the basis of the documentation and briefs submitted, along with any additional information the Board may require to support a final decision. Such information may include a hearing if the Board determines that it is necessary. In deciding whether to uphold an adverse action or any portion of such action, the Board will conduct a thorough review of the issues.
( g ) ( 1 ) A State may obtain judicial review of a final decision by the Board by filing an action within 90 days after the date of such decision. It should file this action with the district court of the United States in the judicial district where the State agency is located or in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
( 2 ) The district court will review the final decision of the Board on the record established in the administrative proceeding, in accordance with the standards of review prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 706(2). The court will base its review on the documents and supporting data submitted to the Board.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 30 

Providing for the appointment of Antoinette Bush as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2023 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. PETERS) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Antoinette Bush as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 

Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43) the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Steve Case of Vir8 ginia on April 25, 2023, is filled by the appointment of 

9 Antoinette Bush of the District of Columbia. The appointVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:34 May 17, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ30.IS SJ30

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 30 IS 

1 ment is for a term of six years, beginning on the later 

2 of April 25, 2023, or the date of enactment of this joint 

3 resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 12.2

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A)

I, Uri Levy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Gaming Ventures plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
     annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
     and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: July 17, 2007

                                                              /s/ Uri Levy
                                                         -----------------------
                                                               Uri Levy
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 75282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9722]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 71 FR 71597, 
December 11, 2006.

Status: Open Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Auditorium, LL-002, Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Wednesday, December 13, 
2006.

Change in the Meeting: Additional Item.
    The following matter will also be considered as part of Item 3 
during the 10 a.m. Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 13, 
2006:
    The Commission will consider whether to propose changes to its 
requirements for attestation reports.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9722 Filed 12-12-06; 10:53 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/11

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 2046.1 

December 5, 2013 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway ' 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Forman ^ ^ 

Attomey 

Proposed Draft Final Audit Report on the State Democratic 

Executive Committee of Alabama (LRA 893) 

I. INTRODUCTION 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Draft Final Audit Report 

("DFAR") for the State Democratic Executive Committee of Alabama. The DFAR contains one 

finding: Recordkeeping for Employees. We concur with the finding. If you have any questions, 

please contact Margaret J. Forman, the attomey assigned to this audit.
Argued January 2,

decided January 23 ;

modified on rehearing June 25 ;

motion to re-tax costs denied August 14, 1912.

#### PORTER *v.*SMALL.

[120 Pac. 398: 124 Pac. 649.]

From Lake: George Noland, Judge.

This is an action by John C. Porter, by James C. Porter, his guardian, against Geo. H. Small. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

For appellant, there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Edward B. Watson, Mr. W. J. Moore*and *Mr. Thomas S. Farrell,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Watson.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. W. Lair Thompson, Mr. John A. Carson*and *Mr. J. D. Venator,*with oral arguments by *Mr. Thompson*and *Mr. Carson.*

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case arises out of the same conditions and is similar in all respects to the case of *Wesley F. Porter et al.*v. *George H. Small,*62 Or. 574 (120 Pac. 393), just decided, and the reasoning in that case applies equally to this.

On the authority of that decision, the judgment in this casé is affirmed. (See 62 Or. 574.)

Affirmed : Modified on Rehearing.
# FILED
March 09, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON FEBRUARY

1999 SESSION

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) NO. 02C01-9805-CR-00146 Appellee, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. W. FRED AXLEY, THOMAS BOON E, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Voluntary Manslaughter)

FOR THE APPELLANT : EDWIN C. LENOW 100 N. Main Building #2325 Memphis, TN 38103-0523 FOR THE APPEL LEE : PAUL G. SUMMERS Attorney General and Repor ter J. ROSS DYER Assistant Attorney Gener al Cordell Hull Buildi ng, 2nd Floor 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243-0493 WILLIAM L. GIBBONS District Attorney General ROSEMA RY AN DREWS Assistant

District Attorney

General 201 Poplar Avenue, Suite 301 Memphis, TN 38103-1947

OPINION FI LED:

AFFIRMED
JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE2 OPINION Defendant appeals as of righ t from hi s convictio n by a Shelby County jury of voluntarymanslaughter. The sole issue r aised is venue. We find venue was properly established and AFFIRM the judgment of the tr ial court. On March 21, 1997, several Collierville Police officers responded to a call at 174 Woodfern Cove, Colliervil l e, Tennessee. Defendant had shot and killed Ellis L. Morris. Of ficer Bu nker test ified th at 174 W oodfer n Cove is in Collierville. Officer Flynn testified that Coll ierville is in S helby County, Tennessee. The testimony at trial cl early established v enue. See

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39- 11-201(e); State v. Hutcherson , 790 S.W.2d 532, 535 (Tenn. 19 90 ). We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court

.

_____________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
CONCUR:

_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY

, JUDGE

_____________________________ JAMES C. BEA

SLEY, SR., SPECIAL JUDGE
Manchester District Court,

No. 5648.

#### John Medico *v.*Albert F. Almasy.

Submitted September 8, 1967.

Decided October 31, 1967.

*Harkaway, Barry & Gall*for the plaintiff.

*AlbertF Almasy, pro se,*filed no brief.

Per curiam.

RSA 525:1 provides that “Costs shall follow the event of every action or petition, unless otherwise directed by law or by the court.” This section, together with RSA 525:3 gives the Superior Court discretion with respect to the allowance of costs. *Averill*v. *Mathes, 55*N. H. 617; *Hatch*v. *Rideout,*96 N. H. 122. RSA 502-A:30 provides with respect to civil actions in district courts that “Travel and attendance of parties and other costs and fees shall be allowed as in the superior court . . . .” This section by implication gives the district courts the *325same discretion as the Superior Court has with respect to costs.

This discretion, however, is not unlimited. In *Clement*v. *Wheeler, 25*N. H. 361, 368, it was said that the general rule is “that the prevailing party is *prima facie*entitled to costs .... The failing party must show the court that it would be contrary to the ordinary principles of justice that he should pay the costs of the proceeding.” See also, *Preston*v. *Cutter,*65 N. H. 85; *Lyford,*v. *Bryant,*38 N. H. 88; *Belknap*v. *Railroad,*48 N. H. 388.

In the case before us the acting justice made an order of “No costs.” “The question of justice presented by [plaintiff’s] motion for costs, was a question of fact determinable [by the district court]. The decision of that question required a consideration of evidence that is not stated in the case.” *Mudgett*v. *Melvin,*66 N. H. 402, 403. We are unable to say, therefore, that the court below abused its discretion.

*Exception overruled.*
#### § 400.141 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Refugee social services* means any service set forth in § 400.154 or § 400.155 of this subpart.

[54 FR 5481, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33603, June 28, 1995]
Exhibit 4.2.2

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED

DECLARATION OF TRUST AND TRUST AGREEMENT

OF

DB US DOLLAR INDEX MASTER TRUST

This Amendment No. 2 (Amendment No. 2) to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement dated as of
January 31, 2007 (the Declaration of Trust) of DB US Dollar Index Master Trust (the Master Trust) by and among DB Commodity Services LLC (the Managing Owner), Wilmington Trust Company and
PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust.

WHEREAS, the Managing Owner has obtained the written approval of each series of
PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust to amend the Declaration of Trust to memorialize changes in certain fee provisions disclosed in the Declaration of Trust; and

WHEREAS, the Managing Owner wishes to amend the Declaration of Trust pursuant to Section 11.1(a) thereof to give effect to the foregoing.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of all of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Declaration of Trust is amended as follows:



| | 1. | Effective as of January 4, 2010, Section 4.9 shall be amended and replaced in its entirety as follows:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 4.9.    Compensation to the Managing Owner. The Managing Owner shall be entitled to compensation
for its services as managing owner of the Master Trust as set forth in the Prospectus.



| | 2. | This Amendment No. 2 to the Declaration of Trust shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Declaration of Trust, as amended.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remainder of page left blank intentionally.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 has been executed for
and on behalf of the undersigned effective as of the 4thday of January, 2010.



DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC, as Managing OwnerBy:

/s/ Martin KremensteinName: Martin KremensteinTitle: Chief Operating OfficerBy:

/s/ Michael GilliganName: Michael GilliganTitle: Principal Financial Officer


Acknowledged:

WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its

individual capacity but solely as Trustee

of the Master Trust

|    |  |                      
|--- |  | ---------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Joseph B. Feil   
|    |  | Name: Joseph B. Feil 
|    |  | Title: Vice President