alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

A13-06 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Utah Republican 

Party (URP) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on September IS, 2016, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorimdum on the Utah Republican Party (URP), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated 

August 10,2016. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

Voted affirmatively for the. decision. 

Attest: 

SjiudlniJii 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Cbn^ission 
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-06 

Audit Division Recommendation ) Agenda Document No. 16-38-A 

Memorandum on the Utah Republican ) 

Party ) 

SECOND AMENDED CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Gair, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open meeting on 

December 01,2016 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in the 

above-captioned matter: 

1. Decided by.a vote of 6-0 to: 

a. Reconsider the vote with respect to the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Utah R^ublican Party in Agenda Document No. 

16-38-A. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Waltfaer, and Weintraub voted 

afSrmatively for the decision. 

2. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

a. . In Agenda Docummt No. 16-38-A, approve Findings 1,2,3, S, and 6. 

: Coimnissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

3. Failedby avoteof3-3 to: 

a. Approve Finding 4. 
Federal Election Conunission Page 2 

Certification for the Audit Division Reconunendation 

Memorandum on the Utah Republican Party (A13-06) 

December 1,2016 

Commissioners Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Cohunissiohers Goodman, Hunter, and Petersen dissented. 

4. Decided by a vote of 4-2 to: 

a. Approve the recommendation for the Recordkeeping for Employees Finding 

as set forth in Agenda Document No. 16-38-A related to the $270,738 that the 

Committee disclosed as having been paid with the allocation of federal and 

non-federal funds. 

b. Direct the Audit Division to include in a proposed Final Audit Report an 

additional issues section addressing the $14,504 for the 100% non-federal 

payments. 

Conunissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, and Walther voted affirmatively for the 

motion. Commissioners Ravel and Weintraub dissented. 

Attest: 

/JJLCJL yy kjL/J f^ lb 

Date Shelley E. Garr 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
#### Thurston, Appellant, *v.*Assets Realization Company

(No. 3).

July 15, 1914:

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The same questions arise in this appeal which were considered and disposed of in the appeal of I. Leonard Aronson in an opinion this day filed, ante, p. 99, arising out of the same case. For the reasons there stated this appeal is dismissed and the judgment affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
#### Susan M. Morgan et al., as Trustees under the Will of Dayton S. Morgan, Deceased, Respondents, *v.*The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

*Margan*v. *Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Oo.,*182 App. Div. 455, affirmed.

(Argued January 28, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 10, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of tlio *court on*trial at Special Term and dismissing appeals from orders directing service of the summons by publication upon defendants other than the appellant herein in an action to establish a right to the amount due upon a policy of life insurance and to recover the same.

*Louis L. Babcock*for appellant.

*Joseph H. Morey*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, the rights of the non-resident defendants, under the provisions of the Constitution of the United States, were not violated by making the orders of publication herein, dated November 13, 1905, and June 4, 1906, and by the courts of this state exercising jurisdiction over said defendants upon the service of the summons herein upon them pursuant to such orders; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
#### § 410.1301 Applicability of this subpart.

This subpart applies to all standard programs and secure facilities. This subpart is applicable to other care provider facilities and to PRS providers where specified.
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Mackenzie
Taylor Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kendall
O’Leary, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:
January 10, 2010








KENDALL
O’LEARY


Kendall
O’Leary


Chief
Accounting Officer, Chief


Financial
Officer and Director








-1-
Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC"), formerly Integrated  Performance Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we the undersigned officers of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 14, 2007 | /s/    BRAD JACOBY     
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Brad Jacoby            
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |                        
|Date: March 14, 2007 | /s/    BRAD J. PETERS  
|                     | Brad J. Peters         
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
Before me, a Notary Publlc, for the County ancl State aforesaid, Edward Dulin, known

to me to be such, who being sworn according to law deposes and says that he is

president of Independent Newsmedia Inc. USA, the publisher of the Delaware stateNews, a claily newspaper published at Dover, County of Kent, and State of Delaware'

State of Delaware:

County of Kent.

and that the notice, a coPY ofState News ìn its issue of

Presideni

lndependent Newsmedia lnc. USA

as published in the Delaware

Sworn to berore me this l?thDay of

/1r-t '^

^D cu l¿--
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-29T1
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-29T1


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                           Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### § 607.11 Non-waiver of rights.

An employee's involuntary payment of all or any part of a debt collected under the regulations in this part will not be construed as a waiver of any rights that the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of law.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7229

STANLEY WILSON CRUSENBERRY, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-271-7) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 28, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Wilson Crusenberry, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Stanley Wilson Crusenberry appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Crusenberry v. Angelone , No. CA-01-271-7 (W.D. Va. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 2555.445 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient shall not apply any rule concerning a student's actual or potential parental, family, or marital status that treats students differently on the basis of sex.
( b ) *Pregnancy and related conditions.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not discriminate against any student, or exclude any student from its education program or activity, including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, unless the student requests voluntarily to participate in a separate portion of the program or activity of the recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient may require such a student to obtain the certification of a physician that the student is physically and emotionally able to continue participation as long as such a certification is required of all students for other physical or emotional conditions requiring the attention of a physician.
( 3 ) A recipient that operates a portion of its education program or activity separately for pregnant students, admittance to which is completely voluntary on the part of the student as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall ensure that the separate portion is comparable to that offered to non-pregnant students.
( 4 ) Subject to § 2555.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy and recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability with respect to any medical or hospital benefit, service, plan, or policy that such recipient administers, operates, offers, or participates in with respect to students admitted to the recipient's educational program or activity.
( 5 ) In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its students, or in the case of a student who does not otherwise qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence for as long a period of time as is deemed medically necessary by the student's physician, at the conclusion of which the student shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,992,000
<SECURITIES>                                 9,862,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,697,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,033,000
<PP&E>                                       2,893,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             187,673,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,079,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 230,772,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               187,673,000
<SALES>                                      4,818,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,818,000
<CGS>                                        2,199,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,199,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,777,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,813,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,813,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,813,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q**

**OF GOLDLEAF FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC.**

**FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of2002, that, to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief, the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Issuer”)for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):

 

(a)                                  fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

This Certification isexecuted as of May 14, 2009.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
|   | /s/ DANIEL OWENS                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel Owens*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
§ 233.24 Retrospective budgeting; determining eligibility and computing the assistance payment in the initial one or two months. ( a ) States which make assistance payments within 25 days of the close of the budget month shall determine eligibility and compute the amount of the payment for all recipients prospectively for the initial month of assistance. These States may choose to determine eligibility and compute the payment prospectively for the second month, also.
( b ) States which make assistance payments between 25 and 45 days from the close of the budget month shall determine eligibility and compute the amount of the payment prospectively for the initial two months of assistance.
( c ) When a person who previously received assistance reapplies during the same month in which a termination became effective, eligibility shall be determined according to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. However, the amount of the assistance payment for the month of the reapplication shall be computed retrospectively.
[44 FR 26083, May 4, 1979]
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





Wilshire
      Credit Corporation


14523
      SW
      Millikan Way


Suite
      200


Beaverton,
      Oregon 97005





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-HE4





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of July 1, 2006
      among
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wilshire Credit
      Corporation, as servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
      relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-HE4





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of John J. Collins, as Executor of David Pearson, Deceased. St. Mary’s Hospital of the City of Brooklyn, Appellant; John J. Collins, as Executor, et al., Respondents.

(Submitted February 8, 1909;

decided February 16, 1909.)

Motion for re-argument denied, without costs. (See 194 N. Y. 540.)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1532 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1532

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the statute of 
     limitations on the award of the congressional medal of honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2009

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the statute of 
     limitations on the award of the congressional medal of honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON AWARD OF 
              CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR.

    (a) Army.--Section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``medal of honor,'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``medal of honor,''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) No medal of honor or device in place thereof may be awarded 
to a person unless it appears from records of the Department of the 
Army that the person is entitled to the award.''.
    (b) Navy and Marine Corps.--
            (1) Limitations of time.--Section 6248 of such title is 
        amended--
                    (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``medal of 
                honor,''; and
                    (B) in subsection (b), by striking ``medal of 
                honor,''.
            (2) Posthumous awards.--Section 6250 of such title is 
        amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``(a) Award Authorized; Time 
                Limitation.--'' before ``If''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                subsection:
    ``(b) Exception for Medal of Honor.--The time limitation specified 
in subsection (a) does not apply in the case of the posthumous award of 
the medal of honor.''.
    (c) Air Force.--Section 8744 of such title is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``medal of honor,'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``medal of honor,''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) No medal of honor or device in place thereof may be awarded 
to a person unless it appears from records of the Department of the Air 
Force that the person is entitled to the award.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1233.7 How does the Director communicate with state and local officials concerning the Agency's programs? ( a ) The Director provides opportunities for consultation by elected officials of those state and local governments that would provide the nonfederal funds for, or that would be directly affected by, proposed federal financial assistance from the Agency. For those programs covered by a state process under § 1233.6, the Director, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the official state process to determine views of state and local elected officials; and,
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials, through the official state process, as early in a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions.
( b ) The Director provides notice to directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of proposed federal financial assistance if: ( 1 ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The assistance involves a program not selected for the state process.
This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register, or other appropriate means, which the Agency in its discretion deems appropriate.