**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Emergency Stimulus Act of 2008**

I, Susan Martinez, certify, based on my knowledge, that: 

(i) The compensation committee of Florida Bank Group, Inc. (the “Company”) has discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with senior risk officers at least every six months during any part of themost recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period, the senior executive officer (SEO) compensation plans and employee compensation plans and the risks these plans pose to the Company. 

(ii) The compensation committee of the Company has identified and limited during any part of the most recently completed fiscal yearthat was a TARP period, any features of the SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of the Company, and has identified any features of the employee compensation plans thatpose risks to the Company and has limited those features to ensure that the Company is not unnecessarily exposed to risks; 

(iii) The compensation committee has reviewed, at least every six months during any part of the most recently completed fiscal yearthat was a TARP period, the terms of each employee compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited anysuch features; 

(iv) The compensation committee of the Company will certify to the reviews of the SEO compensation plansand employee compensation plans required under (i) and (iii) above; 

(v) The compensation committee of the Company willprovide a narrative description of how it limited during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period the features in 

(A) SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of the Company; 

(B) Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose the Company to risks; and 

(C) Employee compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company to enhancethe compensation of an employee; 

(vi) The Company has required that bonus payments to SEOs or any of the next twentymost highly compensated employees, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 as amended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“EESA”)(bonus payments), be subject to a recovery or “clawback” provision during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period if the bonus payments were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or anyother materially inaccurate performance metric criteria; 

(vii) The Company has prohibited any golden parachute payment,as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to a SEO or any of the next five most highly compensated employees during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; 

(viii) The Company has limited bonus payments to its applicable employees in accordance with section 111 of EESA and the regulationsand guidance established thereunder during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; 

(ix) The Company and its employees have complied with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the regulations andguidance established under section 111 of EESA, during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; and any expenses that, pursuant to this policy, required 

approval of the board of directors, a committee of the board of directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with a similar level of responsibility were properly approved; 

(x) The Company will permit a non-binding shareholder resolution in compliance with any applicable federal securities rules andregulations on the disclosures provided under the federal securities laws related to SEO compensation paid or accrued during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; 

(xi) The Company will disclose the amount, nature, and justification for the offering during any part of the most recently completedfiscal year that was a TARP period of any perquisites, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is subject to the bonus payment limitations identified inparagraph (viii); 

(xii) The Company will disclose whether the Company, the board of directors of the Company, or thecompensation committee of the Company has engaged during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period, a compensation consultant; and the services the compensation consultant or any affiliate of the compensationconsultant provided during this period; 

(xiii) The Company has prohibited the payment of any gross-ups, as defined inthe regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to the SEOs and the next twenty most highly compensated employees during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; 

(xiv) The Company has substantially complied with all other requirements related to employee compensation that are provided in theagreement between the Company and Treasury, including any amendments; 

(xv) The Company has submitted to Treasury acomplete and accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next most highly compensated employees for the current fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of annual compensation, and with the name, title, and employer of eachSEO and most highly compensated employee identified; and 

(xvi) I understand that a knowing and willful false orfraudulent statement made in connection with this certification may be punished by fine, imprisonment, or both. (See, for example, 18 USC 1001). 

Date: March 25, 2011 

 
/s/ SUSAN MARTINEZ
Susan Martinez

ChiefExecutive Officer