alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended ( 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, Implementation R25.                     

*Date:*                         March 12, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Mary C. Blehar, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Director, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 7216, MSC 9634, Bethesda, MD 20892-9634, 301-443-4491,                         *mblehar@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 26, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1026  Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-7 Trust(the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a  materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Greenpoint Mortgage Company.

Date:  March 15, 2007

  /s/ Thomas G. LehmannName:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert Fraser, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lions Gate Lighting Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: June 13, 2007

 

/s/ Robert Fraser

Robert Fraser

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

Of Transportation 

SUBJECT: Notice of Communication in Docket: 

FROM: 

TO: 

FAA-2015-3491 

Secretary Anthony R. Foxx,@ 

Chief of Dockets 

Memorandum 

DATE: November 24 2015 ' 

On September 18,2015, during a telephone conversation with U.S.· Senator Debbie Stabenow 

(D-MI), the Senator raised the subject of air service between Lansing Capital Region 

International Airport (LAN) and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). Senator 

Stabenow expressed support for the continuation of this service given its importance to the 

community. 

I informed Senator Stabenow that I could not comment on the merits because the matter was 

under active consideration by the Federal Aviation Administration. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket. 

cc: U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
**
**Exhibit 8.1**

**Vedanta Limited**

**Subsidiaries of Vedanta Limited**

 
**Subsidiaries**  **Country of Incorporation**Cairn Energy India Pty Limited  AustraliaCopper Mines of Tasmania Pty Limited (“CMT”)  AustraliaThalanga Copper Mines Pty Limited (“TCM”)  AustraliaBharat Aluminium Company Limited (“BALCO”)  IndiaElectrosteel Steels Limited3  IndiaGoa Sea Port Private Limited  IndiaHindustan Zinc Limited (“HZL”)  IndiaMALCO Energy Limited (“MEL”)  IndiaMaritime Ventures Private Limited  IndiaParadip Multi Cargo Berth Private Limited  IndiaSesa Mining Corporation Limited  IndiaSesa Resources Limited (“SRL”)  IndiaSterlite Ports Limited  IndiaTalwandi Sabo Power Limited (“TSPL”)  IndiaVedanta Star Limited***  IndiaVizag General Cargo Berth Private Limited  IndiaKilloran Lisheen Finance Limited  IrelandKilloran Lisheen Mining Limited  IrelandLisheen Milling Limited  IrelandLisheen Mine Partnership  IrelandVedanta Exploration Ireland Limited  IrelandVedanta Lisheen Holdings Limited  IrelandVedanta Lisheen Mining Limited  IrelandAvanStrate Inc. (‘ASI’)1  JapanCairn India Holdings Limited  JerseyWestern Cluster Limited  LiberiaBloom Fountain Limited  MauritiusCIG Mauritius Holdings Private Limited  MauritiusCIG Mauritius Private Limited  MauritiusSesa Sterlite Mauritius Holdings Limited (“SSMHL”)*  MauritiusTHL Zinc Ltd  MauritiusTHL Zinc Ventures Limited  MauritiusTwin Star Energy Holdings Limited (“TEHL”)*  MauritiusTwin Star Mauritius Holdings Limited (“TMHL”)*  MauritiusAmica Guesthouse (Proprietary) Limited  NamibiaNamzinc (Proprietary) Limited  NamibiaRosh Pinah Health Care (Proprietary) Limited  NamibiaSkorpion Mining Company (Proprietary) Limited (‘NZ’)  NamibiaSkorpion Zinc (Proprietary) Limited (‘SZPL’)  NamibiaTHL Zinc Namibia Holdings (Proprietary) Limited (“VNHL”)  NamibiaLakomasko BV  NetherlandsMonte Cello BV (“MCBV”)  NetherlandsTHL Zinc Holding BV  NetherlandsCairn Energy Discovery Limited  ScotlandCairn Energy Gujarat Block 1 Limited  ScotlandCairn Energy Hydrocarbons Limited  Scotland**Cairn Exploration (No. 2) Limited  ScotlandBlack Mountain Mining (Proprietary) Limited  South AfricaCairn South Africa Pty Limited  South AfricaAvanStrate Korea Inc1  South KoreaCairn Lanka Private Limited  Sri LankaAvanStrate Taiwan Inc1  TaiwanFujairah Gold FZC  United Arab EmiratesSterlite (USA) Inc.*  United States of America
 
*
TMHL, TEHL and SSMHL were dissolved on May 19, 2019, May 21, 2019 and May 21, 2019 respectively.Sterlite (USA) Inc is under liquidation. 
**
Principal place of business is in India 
***
Incorporated during the current year 
1
On December 28, 2017, the Group through its wholly owned subsidiary, acquired 51.6% equity stake inAvanStrate Inc. (ASI) 
2
The Group also has interest in certain trusts which are neither significant nor material to the Group.
3
On June 4, 2018, the Group through its wholly owned subsidiary, acquired 90.0% equity stake inElectrosteel Steels Limited (ESL) 
**
#### § 2550.110 What grants will be available from the Corporation to assist in establishing and operating a State Commission, Alternative Administrative Entity, or Transitional Entity?

(a) *Administrative Grants.* The Corporation may make administrative grants to States in an amount no less than $250,000 and up to $1 million for the purpose of establishing or operating a State Commission or AAE; these grants will be available to States which have Corporation-approved Transitional Entities only if those States commit to establishing a Corporation-approved State Commission or AAE prior to the expiration of the transitional period.

(b) *Limitation on Federal share.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the amount of a grant that may be provided to a State under this subsection, together with other Federal funds available to establish or operate the State Commission or AAE, may not exceed 50 percent of the total cost to establish or operate the State Commission or AAE.

(c) *Alternative Match Schedule.* The Corporation may permit a State that demonstrates hardship or a new State Commission to meet alternative matching requirements for such a grant as follows:

| Grant amount | Match requirement |
| --- | --- |
| (1) First $100,000 | No match requirement. |
| (2) Amounts above $100,000 but less than $250,000 | $1 of non-Federal funds for every $2 provided by the Corporation in excess of $100,000. |
| (3) Amounts greater than $250,000 | $1 of non-Federal funds for every $1 provided by the Corporation in excess of $250,000. |

[74 FR 46508, Sept. 10, 2009]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3645

___________

Jay B. Marcus; Marcus for Congress, *

a political committee; The Natural Law *

Party of Iowa, a political committee; *

Edward T. Rusk, of the Working Class *

Party; Michael Cuddehe; Michael *

Dimick; Rogers Badgett; Peter *

Lamoureux; Fred Gratzon; Susan *

Marcus, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Iowa Public Television, a state agency; *

Daniel K. Miller, in official capacity, *

* 

Appellees. *

___________

ORDER

 Filed: July 30, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG,

WOLLMAN, MAGILL, BEAM, LOKEN, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, en banc.

___________

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-

In the autumn of 1996, Iowa Public Television (IPTV), a government-owned

public television broadcaster, scheduled a series of joint appearances between

Democratic and Republican candidates for seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

IPTV did not allow various third-party candidates for those seats to appear with the

major-party candidates because it did not consider them to be newsworthy. The thirdparty candidates brought this suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief allowing

their appearance on the IPTV broadcasts, and the district court denied relief. See

1

Marcus v. Iowa Pub. Television, No. 4-96-CV-80690, 1996 WL 764143, at *4 (S.D.

Iowa Oct. 9, 1996). The third-party candidates appealed, and in the interim sought an

emergency injunction from this Court. We denied interim relief, see Marcus v. Iowa

Pub. Television, 97 F.3d 1137, 1138 (8th Cir. 1996), and now affirm the district court.

This case is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Arkansas Educational

Television Commission v. Forbes, 118 S. Ct. 1633 (1998). In Forbes, the Supreme

Court held that a political candidate debate program produced by a government-owned

public television broadcaster was a non-public forum, see id. at 1643, and that the

broadcaster could therefore limit participation in such a debate program where the

limitation was viewpoint neutral and reasonable. See id. In this case, the district court

did not clearly err in finding that the third-party candidates were not excluded on the

basis of viewpoint, see Marcus, 1996 WL 764143, at *2, and we conclude that their

exclusion was otherwise reasonable.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Benjamin A. Bylow *v.*Union Casualty *&*Surety Company.

May Term, 3900.

Present: Taet, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed June 19, 1900.

*Accident insurance policy*— “ *Wholly and continuously disabled”*— Identity *of occupation*— To *oversee is to superintend*— One cannot be said to be wholly and continuously disabled from performing any and every duty pertaining to his occupation, within the meaning of an accident insurance policy, when one of his duties is “overseeing,” and he continues in the same employment “superintending” the kind of work he had previously been engaged in, working nine-tenths of full time and receiving ninéty per cent of full pay.

Assumpsit on an accident insurance policy. Pleas, the general issue and three special pleas. City Court of Barre, February 26, 1900. Trial by court, Boyce, J. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.

*Geo. A. Brigham*and *William Wishart*for the plaintiff.

*Edward 3. Beavitt*for the defendant.

Tart, C. J.

This case is brought to this court by exceptions from the City Court of Barre. The plaintiff was insured by the defendant company against accident and in order to entitle him to recover, one condition of the policy was, that the accident which caused the injury for which he seeks to recover should “immediately and independently of all other causes and wholly and continuously disable and prevent the insured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation.” It appears by the policy that the plaintiff’s occupation was a lumper in a granite cutting yard, the duties of which employment were “overseeing and changing and boxing granite, loading and unloading cars.” The plaintiff’s thumb was injured when at work as such lumper and he continued thereafter in the employ of the granite firm in superintending the work that he *326had been previously doing. To oversee is to superintend. Webster’s Int. Die. 1024.

It thus appears that he was not wholly and continuously disabled and prevented from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation for he continued in the employ of the same firm in connection with his duties, performing them in part, receiving ninety per cent, of his full pay, working nine hours daily instead of ten at the same rate per hour that had been' paid him. Under this state of facts he is not entitled to-recover.

*Judgment of the Cit/y Court is reversed and judgment for the defendant for its costs.*
§ 1159.11 How can I appeal a refusal to amend or correct an Endowment record? ( a ) You may appeal a refusal to amend or correct a record to the Chairperson. Such appeal must be made in writing within 10 business days of your receipt of the initial refusal to amend or correct your record. Your appeal should be sent to the Office of the General Counsel (see § 1159.3 of this part), should indicate that it is an appeal, and should include the basis for the appeal.
( b ) The Chairperson will review your request to amend or correct the record, the General Counsel's refusal, and any other pertinent material relating to the appeal. No hearing will be held.
( c ) The Chairperson shall render his or her decision on your appeal within 30 business days of its receipt by the Endowment, unless the Chairperson, for good cause shown, extends the 30-day period. Should the Chairperson extend the appeal period, you will be informed in writing of the extension and the circumstances of the delay.
( d ) If the Chairperson determines that the record that is the subject of the appeal should be amended or corrected, the record will be so modified, and you will be informed in writing of the amendment or correction. Where an accounting was made of prior disclosures of the record, all previous recipients of the record will be informed of the corrective action taken.
( e ) If your appeal is denied, you will be informed in writing of the following: ( 1 ) The denial and the reasons for the denial;
( 2 ) That you may submit to the Endowment a concise statement setting forth the reasons for your disagreement as to the disputed record. Under the procedures set forth in paragraph (f) of this section, your statement will be disclosed whenever the disputed record is disclosed; and
( 3 ) That you may seek judicial review of the Chairperson's determination under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(a).
( f ) Whenever you submit a statement of disagreement to the Endowment in accordance with paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the record will be annotated to indicate that it is disputed. In any subsequent disclosure, a copy of your statement of disagreement will be disclosed with the record. If the Endowment deems it appropriate, a concise statement of the Chairperson's reasons for denying your appeal may also be disclosed with the record. While you will have access to this statement of the Chairperson's reasons for denying your appeal, such statement will not be subject to correction or amendment. Where an accounting was made of prior disclosures of the record, all previous recipients of the record will be provided a copy of your statement of disagreement, as well as any statement of the Chairperson's reasons for denying your appeal.
#### § 283.2 What definitions apply to this part?

The following definitions apply to this part:

*Abortions* means induced pregnancy terminations, including both medically and surgically induced pregnancy terminations. This term does not include spontaneous abortions, i.e., miscarriages.

*Act* means the Social Security Act.

*Bonus* refers to the Bonus to Reward Decrease in Illegitimacy Ratio, as set forth in section 403(a)(2) of the Act.

*Calculation period* refers to the four calendar years used for determining the decrease in the out-of-wedlock birth ratios for a bonus year. (The years included in the calculation period change from year to year.)

*Most recent two-year period for which birth data are available* means the most recent two calendar years for which the National Center for Health Statistics has released final birth data by State.

*Most recent year for which abortion data are available* means the year that is two calendar years prior to the current calendar year. (For example, for eligibility determinations made during calendar year 1999, the most recent year for which abortion data are available would be calendar year 1997.)

*NCHS* means the National Center for Health Statistics, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

*Number of out-of-wedlock births for the State* means the final number of births occurring outside of marriage to residents of the State, as reported in NCHS vital statistics data.

*Number of total births for the State* means the final total number of live births to residents of the State, as reported in NCHS vital statistics data.

*Rate of abortions* means the number of abortions reported by the State in the most recent year for which abortion data are available divided by the State's total number of resident live births reported in vital statistics for that same year. (This measure is also more traditionally known as the “abortion to live birth ratio.”)

*Ratio* refers to the ratio of live out-of-wedlock births to total live births, as defined in § 283.5(b).

*State* means the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, as provided in section 419(a)(5) of the Act.

*Vital statistics data* means the data reported by State health departments to NCHS, through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program (VSCP).

*We (and any other first person plural pronouns)* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services or any of the following individuals or organizations acting in an official capacity on the Secretary's behalf: the Assistant Secretary for Children and Families, the Regional Administrators for Children and Families, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Administration for Children and Families.