alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hillsborough,

No. 5578.

#### William A. Welch *& a. v.*Nashua *& a.*

Argued February 7, 1967.

Decided March 29, 1967.

*93*Harkaway, Barry & Gall (Mr. Joseph F. Gall*orally ), for the plaintiffs.

*Leo R.*Lesieur, city solicitor, for the defendant city of Nashua, filed no brief.

*Hamblett, Kerrigan & Hamblett {Mr. Joseph M. Kerrigan*orally ), for the defendants Michael Wollen and Emma L. Somers.

Kenison, C.J.

The appeal in this case is predicated principally on the argument that the holder of an option to purchase is not a person entitled to a variance based on unnecessary hardship to the owner as provided by *s.*45, A(6) of the Nashua zoning ordinance. RSA 31:72 III; *Conery*v. Nashua, 103 N. H. 16, 21. The lack of standing of an option holder in the *Conery*case was not applied to applicants for an exception to a zoning ordinance because unnecessary hardship is not a factor. *Burr*v. Keene, 105 N. H. 228. Recent comment may indicate that the *Conery*holding on the lack of standing of an option holder represents a minority viewpoint. 2 Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning, ch. 40 and 1966 Supp; Annot. 89 A.L.R. 2d 663; Comment, Standing to Appeal Zoning Determinations: The “Aggrieved Person” Requirement, 64 Mich. L. Rev. 1070, 1076 ( 1966 ). See Lefcoe, Land Development Law 1332 ( 1966 ). We agree that the unnecessary hardship must relate to the owner and not to the option holder and in the present case it is clear that that requisite has been established as appears in the agreed statement of facts.

In the present case we are not dealing with an application solely by a holder of an option to purchase land. While the record of the board of adjustment of the city of Nashua is not a stenographic transcript of the evidence, it clearly shows that both the option holder and the owner were represented by an attorney *94in applying for a variance not only at the original hearing but at the rehearing. RSA 31:69, 77. In other words, the owner had the status of an applicant so as to permit the zoning board to grant a variance based on unnecessary hardship for the use of her land even though the application had been signed by the holder of the option to purchase the property. *Cranston Jewish Center*v. *Zoning Bd. of Review,*93 R. I. 364; *Dunham*v. *Zoning Board,*68 R. I. 88. See Note, Zoning Variances, 74 Harv. L. Rev. 1396, 1398 (1961). "... Decisions on point all indicate that if the legal owner joins in the original application, the holder of an option on the property will be allowed to appeal from a denial of the application. ” Comment, Standing to Appeal Zoning Determinations: The “Aggrieved Person” Requirement, 64 Mich. L. Rev. 1070, 1077 ( 1966). See 2 Metzenbaum, Law of Zoning (2d *ed.*1955) *pp.*1040-1041 and 1966 Supp; 2 Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice, *s.*13-4 (3d *ed.*1965 ); 8 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (Rev. vol. 1965) *s.*25.162a.

The first question transferred is answered in the affirmative which renders it unnecessary to consider the answer to the second question transferred. In accordance with the agreement of the parties the petition [appeal] is denied and the order is

*Appeal dismissed.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from SEC Form 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial information.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          1,278
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                1,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     8,664
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          8,659
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           26,927
<LOANS>                                        21,450
<ALLOWANCE>                                       234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 51,688
<DEPOSITS>                                     43,387
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               264
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        8,612
<OTHER-SE>                                       (575)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 51,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 1,066
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,127
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,193
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,066
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,066
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,127
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      98
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (10)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   183
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        183
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      183
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.15
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      10
<RECOVERIES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 234
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              234
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1576 

For the relief of Daniel Wachira. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2009 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Daniel Wachira. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DANIEL 

4 WACHIRA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Daniel Wachira shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1576 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Daniel Wachira 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Daniel Wachira, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1576 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Daniel Wachira shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
---

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Wescorp Energy, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30,
2008, each of the undersigned Douglas Biles, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Terry Mereniuk, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds
knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 14, 2008 | /s/
      Douglas Biles 
|---------------------- | ------------------------
|                       | Douglas Biles           
|                       | Chief Executive Officer 
|                       |                         
|Dated: August 14, 2008 | /s/
      Terry Mereniuk
|                       | Terry Mereniuk          
|                       | Chief Financial Officer 

---
#### A. N. Ridgely, Respondent, *v.*Talbot J. Taylor and Company et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another

*Bidgely*v. Taylm• *& Oo.,*126 App. Div. 303, affirmed.

(Argued October 25, 1909;

decided November 9,1909.)

Appeal from a judgment, entered May 5, 1908, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which reversed an order of the trial court setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial and directed judgment upon the verdict, in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract for the purchase and sale of stock.

*Robert W. Gaudier*and *John Henry Hammond*for appellants.

*I. R. Oelamd*and *Henry J. McDermott*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray and Hiscook, JJ.
# PETROLEUM & OTHER LIQUIDS

GLOSSARY › FAQS › 

### OVERVIEW DATA ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS

View History: Monthly A nnual Download Data (XLS File)



### U.S. Imports of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1993 46 47 47 24 18 50 12 1994 60 25 24 67 47 56 1995 40 0 50 27 28 64 55 27 0 3 50 43 1996 31 24 47 28 32 0 0 58 46 0 0 47 1997 0 0 47 0 0 21 0 0 0 17 0 0 1998 0 0 39 0 0 2 5 5 2 2 5 6 1999 5 68 7 7 9 8 7 8 7 8 7 2000 7 7 10 9 9 9 10 13 11 10 11 10 2001 17 85 20 9 50 12 19 48 17 9 13 16 2002 69 17 19 14 10 11 13 12 13 12 105 11 2003 54 8 9 54 11 8 10 12 11 9 101 5 2004 109 157 143 181 545 337 681 398 518 380 12 81 2005 392 13 206 81 211 86 201 61 690 702 591 2006 132 610 894 905 682 1,550 2,637 3,102 2,268 2,044 1,376 1,208 2007 1,077 1,010 720 733 663 922 1,533 1,586 610 998 393 212 2008 510 505 368 1,491 962 1,571 1,459 1,931 2,466 606 278 463 2009 388 56 79 166 507 705 960 983 310 269 285 12 2010 90 37 49 46 46 46 25 12 5 4 7 6 2011 5 71 305

- = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 9/29/2011 Next Release Date: Last Week of October 2011 Referring Pages:

 Fuel Ethanol (Renewable) Imports from All Countries
 Fuel Ethanol Imports by Area of Entry  Fuel Ethanol Supply and Disposition 

# Page 1 of 1 U.S. Imports of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)

10/4/2011 http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHa ndler.ashx?n=PET&s=MFEIMUS1&f=M
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and  Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 6, 2006



/s/  Jack Abramov

Jack Abramov

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Pauline Schneider

Pauline Schneider

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 24 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-176213) and Amendment No. 553 to the 1940 Act Registration
      Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln
      Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N For Variable Annuities for the registration of
      interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    June 5, 2020
#### § 2540.670 Will my qualification to participate or eligibility for benefits be suspended during the review process?

If the reviewing official determines that, based on the information available, there is a reasonable likelihood that you will be determined disqualified or ineligible, your qualification or eligibility may be suspended, pending issuance of a final decision, to protect the public interest.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

September 8,2014 

MEMORANDUM 

To: The Commission 

Through: 

From: 

By: 

Subject: 

AiecPahner 

Staff Director 

Patricia C. Orrock '^1 

Chief Compliance OfiBcer 

Thomas E. HintermistefX^ 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

ZiEEana O. Pad 

Audit Manager 

Kendrick Smitig^ 

Audit Manager^ 

Jim Miiler^^^ 

Lead Auditor V 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Joe Walsh for 

Congress Committee, Inc. (JWFC) (A13-01) 

Pursuant to Commission Directive No. 70 (FEC Directive on Processing Audit Reports), 

the Audit staff presents its recommendations below and discusses the findings in 

attached Draft Final Audit Report (DFAR). The Office of GmieFBl Counsel has reviewed 

this memorandum and concurs with die recommendations. 

Finding 1. Disdosure of Occnpation/Name of Employer 

JWFC did not submit a response to the Interim Audit Report In response to the 

DFAR, JWFC filed amended disclosure reports that materially complied with the 

recommendation. 

The Audit staff recommends that the Commissiott find that JWFC &iled to 

disclose occupation/name of employer information for contributions fixnn 

individuals totaling $334,146 ard did not danonstiate "best efforts" to obtain, 

maintain, and submit disdosure rnfimnation with respect to these contributions. 
Finding 2. Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit 

JWFC did not submit a response to the Interim Audit Report. In response to the 

DFAR, JWFC provided letters sent to contributors for contributions totaling 

$60,125 that were eligible for presumptive redesignation/reattribution. The Audit 

staff considers the $60,125 as excessive contributions that have been resolved 

untimely. 

The Audit staff recommends that die Commission find that JWFC received 

excessive contributions totaling $92,325.' 

JWFC did not request an audit hearing. 

If this memorandum is approved, a Proposed Final Audit Report will be prepared within 

30 days of the Commission's vote. 

In case of an objection. Directive No. 70 states tiiat the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum will be placed on the next regularly scheduled open session agenda. 

Documents related to this audit report can be viewed in the Voting Ballot Matters folder. 

Should you have any questions, please contact Jim Miller or Zuzana Pacious at 694-1200. 

Attachment: 

- Draft Final Audit Report of the Audit Division on the Joe Walsh for Congress 

Committee, Inc. 

cc: Office of General Counsel 

' This amount consists of excessive contributions resolved untimely (S71,12S) and excessive contributioDS 

resolvable only by a refimd to contributors or dbgoisoment to the U.S. Treasury (S21,200). S92,32S = 

$(71,125 + 21,200).
§ 903.1 Purpose and scope. The purpose of this part is to enable the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation to implement the Privacy Act of 1974, and in particular the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, as added by the Act. The Act was designed to insure that personal information about individuals collected by Federal agencies be limited to that which is legally authorized and necessary, and that the information is maintained in a manner which precludes unwarranted intrusions upon individual privacy. The regulations in this part establish, and make public, procedures whereby an individual can: ( a ) Request notification of whether or not the Corporation maintains or has disclosed a record pertaining to him or her,
( b ) Request access to such a record or an accounting of its disclosure,
( c ) Request that the record be amended, and
( d ) Appeal any initial adverse determination of a request to amend a record.
#### § 2554.35 Will the hearing proceedings be recorded?

The hearing will be recorded and transcribed. Transcripts may be obtained following the hearing from the ALJ at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication. The transcript of testimony, exhibits and other evidence admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for the decision by the ALJ and the authority head. The record may be inspected and copied (upon payment of a reasonable fee) by anyone, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 2554.30.
§ 5.23 Where do I send my FOIA request? We have several FOIA Requester Service Centers (FOIA offices) that process FOIA requests. You should send your FOIA request to the appropriate FOIA Requester Service Center that you believe would have the records you seek. An up-to-date listing is maintained online at *http://www.hhs.gov/foia/contacts/index.html .* You also may submit your request electronically by emailing it to the appropriate FOIA Requester Service Center or by submitting it to the Department's web portal located at *https://requests.publiclink.hhs.gov/palMain.aspx .* ( a ) If you are requesting research data made available under the provisions of 45 CFR 75.322(e), requests for such data should be addressed to the OpDiv that made the award under which the data were first produced. That OpDiv will process your request in accordance with established procedures consistent with the FOIA and 45 CFR 75.322(e).
( b ) We officially receive your request when it reaches the FOIA Requester Service Center with responsibility for the OpDiv or StaffDiv where requested records are likely to be located, but no later than 10 working days after the request first arrives at any of our FOIA Requester Service Centers.
( c ) If you have questions concerning the processing of your FOIA request, you may contact the FOIA Requester Service Center processing your request. If that initial contact does not resolve your concerns, you may wish to contact the designated FOIA Public Liaison for the OpDiv or StaffDiv processing your request. You can find a list of our FOIA Requester Service Centers and Public Liaisons at *http://www.hhs.gov/foia/contacts/index.html .*
## Sum mary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under

E.O.	13563	and	12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review. **Comments on U.S. Environm**  **ental Protection Agency Draft Final Rule,**  **“ Control of Air Pollution f** **rom Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards** **,” RIN 2060 -** **AQ86** RIA Cost Discussion 1. Does EPA present the range of fuel costs for various trading scenarios? A suggest range of costs would be to present the lowest cost option as the full trading scenario and the highest cost option being no trading. The rationale that would support the hi gher end of the cost range as refiners have stated that reliance on the credits to comply with the program may provide a short term solution, but that over the long term capital equipment will need to be installed to meet the program requirements. 2. Sugge st that EPA present a credit analysis that shows how many sulfur cre dits will be available by year. This would help provide refiners with compliance planning and help mainta in liquidity with inter
- company trading. 3. Does EPA present a table with the numb er of revamps, number of grassroots, and number of credits likely to be a vailable from 2014 through 2019? This would be a helpful analysis to include in the cost section of the RIA.