### 74056 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules

[All coordinates referenced use datum NAD 83.]
Regulated Area ......... 100-foot radius around the fireworks launch barge during the loading of pyrotechnics aboard the fireworks barge andduring the transit of the fireworks barge from the loading location to the display location. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.

**24. San Francisco New Years Eve Fireworks**

Sponsor ..................... City of San Francisco. Event Description ...... Fireworks Display. Date ........................... New Years Eve, December 31st. Location ..................... 1,000 feet off the Embarcadero near the Ferry Plaza, San Francisco, CA. Regulated Area ......... 100-foot radius around the fireworks launch barge during the loading of pyrotechnics aboard the fireworks barge andduring the transit of the fireworks barge from the loading location to the display location. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.

**25. Sacramento New Years Eve Fireworks**

Sponsor ..................... Various Sponsors. Event Description ...... Fireworks Display. Date ........................... New Years Eve, December 31st. Location ..................... Near Tower Bridge, Sacramento River. Regulated Area ......... The navigable waters of the Sacramento River within 700 feet of the two shore-based launch locations in approximate positions 38 ° 34 ′48 ′′ N, 121 ° 30 ′ 38 ′′ W and 38 ° 34 ′49 ′′ N, 121 ° 30 ′ 29 ′′ W.

**26. Jameson Beach Fourth of July Fireworks**

Sponsor ..................... Various Sponsors Event Description ...... Fireworks Display. Date ........................... Week of July 4th. Location ..................... South Lake Tahoe near Jameson Beach.Regulated Area ......... 100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the commencement of the scheduled display. Increases to a 560-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.

**27. Feast of Lanterns Fireworks**

Sponsor ..................... Feast of Lanterns, Inc. Event Description ...... Fireworks Display. Date ........................... Last Saturday of July. Location ..................... Near Lover’s Point Park in Pacific Grove, CA. Regulated Area ......... The area of navigable waters within a 490-foot radius of the launch platform located on the beach near Lover’s Point Park in approximate position 36 ° 37 ′ 26 ′′ N, 121 ° 54 ′ 54 ′′ W.

Dated: September 6, 2013. K.L. Schultz, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–29367 Filed 12–9–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–04–P**

**ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS**  **COMPLIANCE BOARD**

**36 CFR Part 1192**

**[Docket No. ATBCB–2013–0001]**

**RIN 3014–AA42**

**Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee** 

**AGENCY :**  Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

**ACTION :**  Notice of advisory committee meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  On May 23, 2013, we, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board), established the Rail Vehicle Access Advisory Committee (Committee) to advise us on revising and updating our accessibility guidelines issued pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act for transportation vehicles that operate on fixed guideway systems (e.g., rapid rail, light rail, commuter rail, intercity rail, and high speed rail). The Committee will hold its second meeting on the following dates and times.

**DATES :**  The Committee will meet on January 9, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on January 10, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the Access Board Conference Room, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004–1111. Call-in information and a communication access real-time translation (CART) web streaming link will be posted on the Access Board’s Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee Web site page at www.access-board.gov/rvaac prior to the meeting.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Paul Beatty, Office of Technical and Information Services, Access Board, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004–1111. Telephone number (202) 272–0012 (Voice); (202) 272–0072 (TTY). Electronic mail address: rvaac@accessboard.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On May 23, 2013, we published a notice establishing a Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee (Committee) to make recommendations to us on matters associated with revising and updating our accessibility guidelines issued pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act for transportation vehicles that operate on fixed guideway systems (e.g., rapid rail, light rail, commuter rail, intercity rail, and high speed rail). See 78 FR 30828 (May 23, 2013).

The Committee will hold its second meeting on January 9, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on January 10, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The agenda for the January meeting includes: Educational presentations; deliberation of committee member concerns pertaining to the accessibility


### 74057 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules

of rail vehicles; and the consideration of process-related matters. The preliminary meeting agenda, along with information about the Committee, is available on our Web site ( www.access-board.gov/rvaac ).

Committee meetings will be open to the public and interested persons can attend the meetings and communicate their views. Members of the public will have opportunities to address the Committee on issues of interest to them during public comment periods scheduled on each day of the meeting. Members of groups or individuals who are not members of the Committee may also have the opportunity to participate in subcommittees if subcommittees are formed.

The meetings will be accessible to persons with disabilities. An assistive listening system, communication access real-time translation (CART), and sign language interpreters will be provided. Persons attending the meetings are requested to refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances for the comfort of other participants (see www.access-board.gov/the-board/ policies/fragrance-free-environment for more information).

Persons wishing to provide handouts or other written information to the Committee are requested to provide electronic formats to Paul Beatty via email at least five business days prior to the meetings so that alternate formats can be distributed to Committee members.

David M. Capozzi,

Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–29457 Filed 12–9–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8150–01–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0778; FRL–9904–00– Region 9]** 

**Disapproval of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Clark County, Nevada** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The EPA is proposing to disapprove revisions to the Clark County portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP contains state and local regulations necessary to meet requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are proposing to disapprove a submission that would revise the SIP to include affirmative defense provisions applicable to violations related to excess emissions during equipment startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) events. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

**DATES :**  Any comments must arrive by January 9, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2013–0778, by one of the following methods:

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov

. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415) 972– 3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov

.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.

Outline

I. The State’s Submittal

A. What regulation did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of the

submitted regulation? C. What is the purpose of the submitted

regulation? D What does the submitted regulation

provide? II. EPA’s Evaluation Criteria

A. General Framework for State Submittal

and EPA Review of SIP Revisions B. Specific Framework for Evaluating SIP

Provisions Regarding Excess Emissions C. What documents did we use in our

evaluation? III. EPA’s Evaluation and Action

A. Does the regulation meet the evaluation

criteria? B. EPA Recommendations To Improve the

Regulation C. Proposed Action and Public Comment IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State’s Submittal
A. What regulation did the State submit?

Table 1 identifies the section of the Clark County Air Quality Regulations (CCAQR) proposed for disapproval, with the dates that it was amended by the Clark County Board of Commissioners (CCBC) and submitted to EPA on behalf of the Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management (DAQEM) by the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP).



### TABLE 

### 1—S UBMITTED 

### R EGULATION

Local agency Regulation number and title Amended Submitted

DAQEM ........................ Section 25: Affirmative Defense for Excess Emissions Due to Malfunctions, Startups, and Shutdown. May 18, 2010 ............. September 1, 2010.