alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Request for Extension to Make Final 

Repayment of Unspent Convention 

Funds - Committee on Arrangements for 

the 2012 Republican National 

Convention 

LRA947 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election Commission, 

do hereby certify that on August 29,2014, the Commission decided by a vote of 

6-0 to take the following actions in the above-captioned matter: 

1. Grant the Committee on Arrangements for the 2012 Republican 

National Convention's Request for Extension to Make Final 

Repayment of Unspent Convention Funds to September 30,2014. 

2. Approve the appropriate letter. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

^ » Date ' Shelley heE.G^. 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JULIE E. ADAMS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Rachel R. Creviston, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 3

CONVENED JANUARY 3, 2021

http://www.senate.gov/ExecutiveCalendar

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

S. RES.

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED

BY

1
TREATIES

CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED

BY

2
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR

REPORTED

BY

3
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
* Committee of jurisdiction has requested appropriate biographical and financial information on this nominee

** Committee of jurisdiction has received the necessary biographical and financial information on this nominee; nominee will remain in this 

section for 10 session days

PRIVILEGED NOMINATIONS

MESSAGE

NO.

DATE

RECEIVED

NOMINEE AND POSITION * INFORMATION 

REQUESTED BY 

COMMITTEE

5

** REQUESTED 

INFORMATION 

RECEIVED

SENATOR REQUESTED REFERRAL TO 

COMMITTEE OF JURISDICTION 

Pursuant to S. Res. 116, 112th Congress, nominations in this section of the Executive Calendar are entitled to expedited procedures.

9 Jan 03, 2021 John M. Barger, of California, to 

be a Member of the Federal 

Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board for a term expiring 

October 11, 2022, vice David 

Avren Jones, term expired.

Yes

10 Jan 03, 2021 Christopher Bancroft Burnham, 

of Connecticut, to be a Member 

of the Federal Retirement 

Thrift Investment Board for a 

term expiring September 25, 

2024, vice Ronald David 

McCray, term expired.

Yes

11 Jan 03, 2021 Frank Dunlevy, of California, to 

be a Member of the Federal 

Retirement Thrift Investment 

Board for a term expiring 

September 25, 2022, vice 

Michael D. Kennedy, term 

expired. 

Yes
NOTICE OF INTENT TO OBJECT

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE AND OFFICE DATE AND SENATOR

6

When a notice of intent to object is given to the appropriate leader, or their designee, and such notice is submitted for inc lusion in 

the Congressional Record and the Senate Executive Calendar, or following the objection to a unanimous consent to proceeding to, and, 

or disposition of, matters relating to nominations and treaties on their behalf, it shall be placed in the section of the Senate Executive 

Calendar entitled “Notice of Intent to Object”. (S. Res. 28, 112th Congress)
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

DATE SUBJECT

7

 After an action taken by the Senate, any Senator voting with the prevailing side or who has not voted may, on the same day or on 

either of the next two days of actual session thereafter, either enter a motion for reconsideration or move a reconsideration. This section 

contains such motions not yet acted on as so provided by Rule XIII, Paragraph 1.
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.302 Purpose.

Inasmuch as prisoners may be under constraints because of their incarceration which could affect their ability to make a truly voluntary and uncoerced decision whether or not to participate as subjects in research, it is the purpose of this subpart to provide additional safeguards for the protection of prisoners involved in activities to which this subpart is applicable.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Diagnostic Imaging International Corp. (the Company) on 10-KSB/A as amended for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Jagodnik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                |                                                 
|--------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|                |                                                 
|August 22, 2008 | /s/ Richard Jagodnik                            
|                | Richard Jagodnik                                
|                | Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
§ 260.55 What are the additional requirements for Federal recognition of good cause domestic violence waivers? To be federally recognized, good cause domestic violence waivers must: ( a ) Identify the specific program requirements that are being waived;
( b ) Be granted appropriately based on need, as determined by an individualized assessment by a person trained in domestic violence and redeterminations no less often than every six months;
( c ) Be accompanied by an appropriate services plan that: ( 1 ) Is developed by a person trained in domestic violence;
( 2 ) Reflects the individualized assessment and any revisions indicated by the redetermination; and
( 3 ) To the extent consistent with § 260.52(c), is designed to lead to work.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1641 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1641

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for a study of the 
                         Cascadia Marine Trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRAIL FOR STUDY.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Cascadia 
Marine Trail Study Act''.
    (b) Designation of Trail for Study.--Section 5(c) of the National 
Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
            ``(__) Cascadia Marine Trail, a series of water trail 
        routes encompassing approximately 2,300 miles of shoreline in 
        the State of Washington, extending from Point Roberts near the 
        Canadian border to the southern reach of Puget Sound near 
        Olympia. In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
        coordinate with appropriate Federal, State, local, tribal, and 
        private entities, and may evaluate sites of recreational, 
        scenic, or historic significance near the Cascadia Marine Trail 
        for potential inclusion in the Trail. The Secretary shall also 
        consider what activities may be limited by the designation, 
        including existing activities, hunting, boating, or proposed 
        infrastructure improvements.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 26, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1641

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for a study of the 
                         Cascadia Marine Trail.
```
FROM: THE BOEING COMPANY

TO: Delta Air Lines (DAL)

[MESSAGE NUMBER:DAL-DAL-13-0578-03B] Boeing Response

MESSAGE DATE: 18 Mar 2013 1125 US PACIFIC TIME / 18 Mar 2013 1825 GMT

The following message is distributed to the following people at Delta Air Lines:

Kendra Johnson

Message Due Date: No Action Required

Field Service Base: BFSATL

Service Category: Service Bulletin Model: 747 Series/Product: SB - Airplane 

Service Bulletin ATA: 2500-00

SUBJECT: 747-25-3428 Compliance Time

REFERENCES:

/A/ DAL-DAL-13-0578-02B

/B/ SB 747-25-3428

/C/ DAL-DAL-13-0578-01F

DESCRIPTION:

The following is a follow-on message to Ref /A/ concerning the 48 month 

compliance time recommendation for accomplishment of Ref /B/.

DAL has indicated that they are accomplishing 747-400 door mounted slide 

overhauls under an extension to 60 months intervals, and would like to accomplish 

Ref /B/ within this same interval.

Boeing has no technical objection to accomplishing Ref /B/ slide latch changes 

within a 60 month interval to align with the DAL slide overhaul interval, 

provided that DAL service experience has been favorable for the potential adverse 

condition of the latch becoming loose resulting the slide detaching from the 

door. The existing recommendation of 48 months was intended to align with the 

slide overhaul interval, and was not specifically risk based.

Please advise if additional information is needed.

REQUIRED ACTION:

None
If attachments are referred to, and are not present, please access them by 

logging into MyBoeingFleet Service Requests application or contact your Boeing 

Field Service Representative.

https://myboeingfleet.boeing.com/servicerequests/index.html?entityId=2-

13SGUGX&entityType=CommunicationMessage

Suppliers, please access attachments by logging into Boeing Partner Network 

Supplier Service Requests application.

M. Dunican Everett - Payloads

Michael Tangen

Commercial Aviation Services

The Boeing Company
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1127

_____________________________

KAREEM D. FARRELL,

Appellant,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, 

Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

May 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Kareem D. Farrell, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian R. Flynn-Fallon, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EX-33 (g)
Securities Servicing
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10286


(logo) The BANK
of NEW YORK

ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING
CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.(collectively,
the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the
servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to any
transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1) (ii), (iii), (iv),
(4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

* The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.


1


(page)


* The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

* As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of
compliance.


The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.

/s/ Robert L. Griffin
Robert L. Griffin
Authorized Signer


The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.

/s/ Patrick J. Tadie
Patrick J. Tadie
Authorized Signer

March 1, 2007


2
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles S. Allison, as Administrator of the Estate of Eli Allison, Deceased, Trustee under the Will of William J. Lazear, Deceased. Cornelius G. Lazear, Appellant; Minor E. Swarthout, as Executor of Frank Swarthout, Deceased, Respondent.

*Matter of Allison,*122 App. Div. 898, affirmed.

(Argued January 4, 1909;

decided January 19, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 27, 1907, which affirmed a decree of the Steuben County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the administrator of the trustee under the will of William J. Lazear, deceased.

*James Q. Sebring, H. C. Harpending*and *H. B. Harpending*for appellant.

*Edwin A. Nash*and *James McCall*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edwabd T. Babtlett, Vann, Weeneb, Willabd Babtlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
§ 618.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
§ 410.1103 Considerations generally applicable to the placement of an unaccompanied child. ( a ) ORR shall place each unaccompanied child in the least restrictive setting that is in the best interest of the child and appropriate to the unaccompanied child's age and individualized needs, provided that such setting is consistent with the interest in ensuring the unaccompanied child's timely appearance before DHS and the immigration courts and in protecting the unaccompanied child's well-being and that of others.
( b ) ORR shall consider the following factors to the extent they are relevant to the unaccompanied child's placement, including: ( 1 ) Danger to self;
( 2 ) Danger to the community/others;
( 3 ) Runaway risk;
( 4 ) Trafficking in persons or other safety concerns;
( 5 ) Age;
( 6 ) Gender;
( 7 ) LGBTQI+ status or identity;
( 8 ) Disability;
( 9 ) Any specialized services or treatment required or requested by the unaccompanied child;
( 10 ) Criminal background;
( 11 ) Location of potential sponsor and safe and timely release options;
( 12 ) Behavior;
( 13 ) Siblings in ORR custody;
( 14 ) Language access;
( 15 ) Whether the unaccompanied child is pregnant or parenting;
( 16 ) Location of the unaccompanied child's apprehension; and
( 17 ) Length of stay in ORR custody.
( c ) ORR may utilize information provided by the referring Federal agency, child assessment tools, interviews, and pertinent documentation to determine the placement of all unaccompanied children. ORR may obtain any records from local, State, and Federal agencies regarding an unaccompanied child to inform placement decisions.
( d ) ORR shall review, at least every 30 days, the placement of an unaccompanied child in a restrictive placement to determine whether a new level of care is appropriate.
( e ) ORR shall make reasonable efforts to provide licensed placements in those geographical areas where DHS encounters the majority of unaccompanied children.
( f ) A care provider facility must accept the placement of unaccompanied children as determined by ORR, and may deny placement only for the following reasons: ( 1 ) Lack of available bed space;
( 2 ) Placement of the unaccompanied child would conflict with the care provider facility's State or local licensing rules;
( 3 ) Initial placement involves an unaccompanied child with a significant physical or mental illness for which the referring Federal agency does not provide a medical clearance; or
( 4 ) In the case of the placement of an unaccompanied child with a disability, the care provider facility concludes it is unable to meet the child's disability-related needs, without fundamentally altering the nature of its program, even by providing reasonable modifications and even with additional support from ORR.
( g ) Care provider facilities must submit a written request to ORR for authorization to deny placement of unaccompanied children, providing the individualized reasons for the denial. Any such request must be approved by ORR before the care provider facility may deny a placement. ORR may follow up with a care provider facility about a placement denial to find a solution to the reason for the denial.
§ 2105.47 When will you be notified of anticipated fees? ( a ) The Agency will notify you under this section unless: ( 1 ) The anticipated fee is less than $50 (*see* § 2105.35(g));
( 2 ) You have been granted a full fee waiver; or
( 3 ) You have previously agreed to pay all the fees associated with the request.
( b ) If none of the exceptions in paragraph (a) of this section apply, the Agency will: ( 1 ) Promptly notify you of the estimated costs for search, review, and/or duplication;
( 2 ) Ask you to provide written assurance within 20 workdays that you will pay all fees or fees up to a designated amount;
( 3 ) Notify you that it will not be able to comply with your FOIA request unless you provide the written assurance requested; and
( 4 ) Give you an opportunity to reduce the fee by modifying the request.
( c ) If the Agency does not receive your written response containing the additional information that resolves any fee issues, in accordance with paragraphs (b)(2) and/or (4) of this section, within 20 workdays after the Agency has requested it, the Agency will presume that you are no longer interested in the records and will close the file on the request.
( d ) After the Agency begins processing a request, if it finds that the actual cost will exceed the amount you previously agreed to pay, the Agency will: ( 1 ) Stop processing the request;
( 2 ) Promptly notify you of the higher amount and ask you to provide written assurance of payment; and
( 3 ) Notify you that it will not be able to fully comply with your FOIA request unless you provide the written assurance requested; and
( 4 ) Give you an opportunity to reduce the fee by modifying the request.
( e ) If you wish to modify your request in an effort to reduce fees, the Agency's FOIA Officer or Public Liaison can assist you.
§ 1631.6 Characteristics of procurements. ( a ) Characteristics indicative of a procurement relationship between a recipient and another entity are when the other entity: ( 1 ) Provides the goods and services within its normal business operations;
( 2 ) Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers;
( 3 ) Normally operates in a competitive environment;
( 4 ) Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the LSC grant; and
( 5 ) Is not subject to LSC's compliance requirements as a result of the agreement, though similar requirements may apply for other reasons.
( b ) In determining whether an agreement between a recipient and another entity constitutes a contract under this part or a subgrant under part 1627 of this chapter, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. All the characteristics above may not be present in all cases, and a recipient must use judgment in classifying each agreement as a subgrant or a contract.