alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-27CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-27CB


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                           Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations as of and for
the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         498,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,715,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,406,305
<PP&E>                                          29,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,657,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          624,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,371
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,018,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,657,632
<SALES>                                      2,807,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,815,908
<CGS>                                        1,420,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,420,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,198,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                160,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,923
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Remi Barbier, Chairman of the Board
of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and Peter S. Roddy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                           
| |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: April 30, 2010                      
| | 
| |  | /s/ REMI BARBIER                          
| |  | Remi Barbier,                             
| |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors,       
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
| | 
| |  | /s/ PETER S. RODDY                        
| |  | Peter S. Roddy,                           
| |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL ERIC BUCHANAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 41 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-13

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

IVAN AND KARENZA A. MIROSEVIC, Petitioners v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 11125-03S. Filed February 15, 2005.

Ivan Mirosevic and Karenza A. Mirosevic, pro sese.

William J. Gregg, for respondent.

LARO, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions

of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the

petition was filed. The decision to be entered is not reviewable

by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as

authority. Subsequent section references are to the Internal

Revenue Code as applicable to 2000, Rule references are to the
-2-

Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and dollar amounts are

rounded to the nearest dollar.

We decide this case without trial. See Rule 122. 

Petitioners petitioned the Court to redetermine a $19,728

deficiency in their 2000 Federal income tax and a $4,608

accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). Following

concessions by both parties, the sole issue left to decide is

whether petitioners’ 2000 taxable income includes $88,885 of

pension income not otherwise included in that taxable income. We

hold it does.

Background

The facts in this background section are obtained from the

parties’ stipulation of facts and the exhibits submitted

therewith. Petitioners are cash method taxpayers who resided in

Croatia when their petition was filed with this Court.

Petitioners filed a joint 2000 Federal income tax return on

which they reported the following items of income realized by

them during 2000:

 Wages $5,209

 Taxable interest 126

 Taxable pension 11,716

 17,051

Petitioners reported as to the taxable pension income that

petitioner Ivan Mirosevic (Mirosevic) had received $117,164 of

pension payments during that year but that only $11,716 of those

payments was taxable. During 2000, Mirosevic received $100,601
-3-

of pension payments. The $117,164 reported by petitioners for

2000 was received in 1999.

Discussion

Respondent determined that petitioners failed to report

$88,885 of pension income for 2000; i.e., the difference between

the reported amount of $11,716 and the $100,601 received by

Mirosevic during 2000. Petitioners concede that this

determination is correct, and they make no argument that they are

not liable for Federal income taxes payable on the $88,885. In

that a taxpayer’s gross income specifically includes income from

a pension, see sec. 61(a)(11), and that petitioners have not made

any claim that Mirosevic’s receipt of the $88,885 is otherwise

excepted from this rule, we sustain respondent’s determination as

to this issue in full. In order to reflect respondent’s

concessions,

Decision will be entered

under Rule 155.
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 2 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 3 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 4 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 5 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 6 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 7 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 8 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 9 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 10 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 11 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 12 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 13 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 14 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 15 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 16 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 17 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 18 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 19 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 20 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 21 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 22 of 23
Case 1:14-cv-01500-CKK-PAM-APM Document 53 Filed 11/03/16 Page 23 of 23
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40241

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BOBBY DEWAYNE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:00-CR-77-2

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Bobby Dewayne Jones

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235,

236-39 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 21, 2009) (No. 09-6657),

which rejected the argument that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)

applies in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceedings and held that a district court may

not reduce a sentence below the minimum provided in the amended Guidelines.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-40241

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                    FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business, Inc. ("Issuer")
for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         a).      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         b).      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results ofF
                  operations of the Issuer.

         This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Issuer for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002.

         This Certification is executed as of November 19, 2002.


                                       /s/ Thomas L. Black
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Thomas L. Black
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/ Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Titl e

Wit h respec t t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) of

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee n met i n accordanc e wit

h th e followin g [initial appropriat e line] :

* \Th e rulemakin g docimient(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio n and Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s were mad e t o th e document(s ) afte r i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio n i s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulatory Enforcement Fairnes s Ac t fo r th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee n met i n accordanc e wit

h th e followin g [initial appropriat e line] :

_^^ ^ Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . Thi s document

i s no t arul e under

( § 804) . y( ^ Th e documen t

ha s bee n submitte dt o C-5 0 fo r transmissio n to Congres s andGAO . Signature 

# l^hn rA . 1iWU f Nam e 

## ^t^i ^ AsSisfan V Genera l (lourlSd.G: ^
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1634 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1634

  To amend title 23, United States Code, to extend the period during 
 which States may allow low emission and energy-efficient vehicles to 
                 use high occupancy vehicle facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

   Mr. Connolly of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to extend the period during 
 which States may allow low emission and energy-efficient vehicles to 
                 use high occupancy vehicle facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF HOV FACILITIES BY LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT 
              VEHICLES.

    Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 166(b)(5) are each amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2009,'' and inserting ``July 1, 2012,''.
                                 <all>
```
Webinar Attendees: The Beverage Vending Machine TP NOPR Meeting Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Buccitelli, Nicole N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street Burlington MA 01803N/A N/A Chara, Allan N/A N/A 11655 Crossroads Cir Baltimore MD 21220 N/A N/A Drenten, Doug N/A Crane Merchandising Systems 3330 Crane Way Williston SC 29853803-266-5000 N/A Ganeshalingam, Mohan Principal Research Associate Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) 1 Cyclotron Road, Building 90 Berkeley CA 94720 N/A N/A Hostick, Donna N/A Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Boulevard, P.O. Box 999, MS K6-05 Richland WA 99352509-372-4323 N/A Johnson, Erica N/A Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354N/A N/A Linney, Robert J. Engineering Manager Royal Vendors, Inc. 426 Industrial Boulevard KearneysvilleWV 25430304-728-7056 x 313 304-725-4728 Malakar, Subarna N/A Crane Merchandising Systems 3330 Crane Way Williston SC 29853803-266-5000 N/A Mau, Michael Senior Refrigeration Engineer Royal Vendors, Inc. 426 Industrial Boulevard KearneysvilleWV 25430304-728-7056 ext. 445 304-725-6579 Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy Coordinator Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP) 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600 Washington DC 20045202-507-4034 N/A Morris, Scott Statistician and Energy Analyst Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, MSIN K6-05 Richland WA 99352509-372-6454 N/A Parle, Jerry N/A U-Select-it 8040 University Blvd Clive IA 50325515-271-8358 N/A Tershak, Andrew N/A Crane Merchandising Systems 3330 Crane Way Williston SC 29853803-266-5000 N/A Wilson, Linda Environmental Scientist New York State Office of the Attorney General (NYS OAG) 120 Broadway New York NY 10271 212-416-8948 212-416-6007 Woodford, Michael W. Vice President, Standards Air-Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) 2111 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500 Arlington VA 22201 703-600-0328 703-528-3816 Zakarian, Arshak N/A Energy Solutions 5263 Locksley Avenue Oakland CA 94618 N/A N/A
§ 1631.20 Disposing of real estate purchased with LSC funds. ( a ) *Disposal by LSC recipients.* During the term of an LSC grant or contract, a recipient must seek LSC's prior written approval to dispose of real estate purchased with LSC funds by: ( 1 ) Selling the property after having advertised for and received offers; or
( 2 ) Transferring the property to another recipient of LSC funds, in which case the recipient may be compensated by the recipient receiving the property for the percentage of the property's current fair market value that is equal to the percentage of the costs of the original acquisition and costs of any capital improvements borne by non-LSC funds.
( b ) *Disposal after a recipient no longer receives LSC funding.* When a recipient who owns real estate purchased with LSC funds stops receiving LSC funds, it must seek LSC's prior written approval to dispose of the property in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) Transfer the property title to another grantee of LSC funds, in which case the recipient may be compensated the percentage of the property's current fair market value that is equal to the percentage of the costs of the original acquisition and costs of any capital improvements by non-LSC funds;
( 2 ) Buyout LSC's interest in the property (*i.e.,* pay LSC the percentage of the property's current fair market value proportional to its percent interest in the property); or
( 3 ) Sell the property to a third party and pay LSC a share of the sale proceeds proportional to its interest in the property, after deducting actual and reasonable closing costs, if any.
( 4 ) When a recipient stops receiving LSC funds because it merged with or is succeeded by another recipient, it may transfer the property to the new recipient. The two entities must execute an LSC-approved successor in interest agreement that requires the transferee to use the property primarily to provide legal services to eligible clients under the requirements of the LSC Act, applicable appropriations acts, and LSC regulations.
( c ) *Prior approval process.* No later than 60 days before a recipient or former recipient proposes to dispose of real estate purchased with LSC funds, the recipient or former recipients must submit a written request for prior approval to dispose of the property to LSC. The request must include: ( 1 ) The proposed method of disposition and an explanation of why the proposed method is in the best interests of LSC and the recipient;
( 2 ) Documentation showing the fair market value of the property at the time of transfer or sale, including, but not limited to, an independent appraisal of the property and competing bona fide offers to purchase the property;
( 3 ) A description of the recipient's process for advertising the property for sale and receiving offers;
( 4 ) An accounting of all LSC funds used in the acquisition and any capital improvements of the property. The accounting must include the amount of LSC funds used to pay for acquisition costs, financing, and capital improvements; and
( 5 ) Information on the proposed transferee or buyer of the property and a document evidencing the terms of transfer or sale.
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tsippy Moldovan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By: /s/ Tsippy Moldovan

Tsippy MoldovanChief Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

June 11, 2009



---

---
§ 264.3 How can a State avoid a penalty for failure to comply with the five-year limit? ( a ) We will not impose the penalty if the State demonstrates to our satisfaction that it had reasonable cause for failing to comply with the five-year limit on Federal assistance or it achieves compliance under a corrective compliance plan, pursuant to §§ 262.5 and 262.6 of this chapter.
( b ) In addition, we will determine a State has reasonable cause if it demonstrates that it failed to comply with the five-year limit on Federal assistance because of federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers provided to victims of domestic violence in accordance with provisions of subpart B of part 260.
[64 FR 17896, Apr. 12, 1999; 64 FR 40292, July 26, 1999]
#### § 1351.13 What are the Federal and non-Federal match requirements under a Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant?

The federal share of the project represents 90 percent of the total project cost supported by the federal government. The remaining 10 percent represents the required project match cost by the grantee. This may be a cash or in-kind contribution.

[81 FR 93060, Dec. 20, 2016]