alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-140428) of Claymont Steel Holdings, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2007, except for Notes 10 and 21 as to which the date is July 23, 2007, relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Claymont Steel Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006,for the periods from June 10, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005 to June 9, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004, which report is included in Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for Claymont Steel Holdings,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Crowe Chizek and Company LLC 

Lexington, Kentucky 

July 23, 2007
Order entered July 22, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01375-CR

No. 05-18-01376-CR

CLEVELAND ELIJAH POWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-24262-U & F16-54139-U

ORDER

Although appellant’s brief was initially due on April 4, 2019, the Court granted two 

extensions of time, making it due June 5, 2019. In our May 8, 2019 order, we cautioned that the 

failure to file a brief by the deadline might result in the appeals being abated for a hearing. To 

date, no brief has been filed, and we have had no communication from appellate counsel.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute these appeals, whether 

appellant has abandoned the appeals, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeals.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, 
the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 

708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court 

is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, 

which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell, 

Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; to John Daniel Oliphant.; and to the Dallas County 

District Attorney’s Office.

These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
#### § 2553.81 Under what conditions may an agency or organization sponsor an RSVP project without CNCS funding?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545, Aug. 30, 2024.

An eligible agency or organization who wishes to sponsor an RSVP project without CNCS funding must make an application through the designated grants management system which is approved by CNCS and documented through the Notice of Grant Agreement (NGA).

[83 FR 64657, Dec. 17, 2018]
Date : November 4, 201 4 

Meeting: General ) (\LA 

Rule(s) Discussed : ·l~~ 

W ritten Materials? Yes~ 

Name Organization Phone N umbe r 

1
§ 411.17 Upgrades to facilities and technologies. ( a ) When designing or acquiring any new facility and in planning any substantial expansion or modification of existing facilities, the care provider facility, as appropriate, must consider the effect of the design, acquisition, expansion, or modification upon their ability to protect UCs from sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
( b ) When installing or updating a video monitoring system, electronic surveillance system, or other monitoring technology in a care provider facility, the care provider facility, as appropriate, must consider how such technology may enhance its ability to protect UCs from sexual abuse and sexual harassment while maintaining UC privacy and dignity.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of IPO Alternative, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Nemelka, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   April 11, 2008/s/ Joseph NemelkaJoseph NemelkaChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
#### § 7.0 Who are employees.

As used in this part, the term *Government employee* means any officer or employee, civilian or military, except such part-time employees or part-time consultants as may be excluded therefrom by a determination made in writing by the head of the employee's office or constituent organization, pursuant to an exemption approved by the Commissioner of Patents that to include him or them would be impracticable or inequitable, given the reasons therefor. A person shall not be considered to be a part-time employee or part-time consultant for this purpose unless the terms of his employment contemplate that he shall work for less than the minimum number of hours per day, or less than a minimum number of days per week, or less than the minimum number of weeks per year, regularly required of full-time employees of his class.

[27 FR 7986, Aug. 10, 1962]
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Eugene W. Parker, as Administrator of the Estate of Delia Parker, Deceased, Appellant. Eugene E. Livermore, Respondent.

*Matter of Parker,*131 App. Div. 923, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 8, 1909;

decided November 23, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 12, 1909, which affirmed a decree of the Jefferson County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the administrator herein.

*F. B. Pitcher*for appellant.

*E. 0. Emerson*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch.- J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Wil t.ard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Hiscook, J.
§ 233.31 Budgeting methods for AFDC. ( a ) *Requirements for State plans.* A State plan for AFDC shall specify that all factors of eligibility shall be determined prospectively and the amount of the assistance for any month for all assistance units required to file a monthly report for the month designated as the budget month under the State's retrospective budgeting procedures shall be determined using retrospective budgeting as provided in §§ 233.31-233.37 except as provided in § 233.34. The State plan shall specify whether the State uses prospective or retrospective budgeting to determine the amount of the assistance payments for recipients not required to report monthly. Budgeting methods for OAA, AB, APTD, and AABD are described in §§ 233.21-233.29.
( b ) *Definitions.* The following definitions apply to §§ 233.31 through 233.37: ( 1 ) *Prospective budgeting* means that the agency shall determine eligibility (and compute the amount of assistance for the first one or two months) based on its best estimate of income and circumstances which will exist in that month. This estimate shall be based on the agency's reasonable expectation and knowledge of current, past or future circumstances.
( 2 ) *Retrospective budgeting* means that the agency shall compute the amount of assistance for a payment month based on actual income or circumstances which existed in a previous month, the “budget month.”
( 3 ) *Budget month* means the fiscal or calendar month from which the agency shall use income or circumstances of the family to compute the amount of assistance.
( 4 ) *Payment month* means the fiscal or calendar month for which an agency shall pay assistance. Payment is based upon income or circumstances in the budget month. In prospective budgeting, the budget month and the payment month are the same. In retrospective budgeting, the payment month follows the budget month.
( 5 ) *Recent work history* means the individual received earned income in any one of the two months prior to the budget month.
[47 FR 5678, Feb. 5, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 35602, Sept. 10, 1984; 57 FR 30160, July 8, 1992]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 8 (Friday, January 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1567-1568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [To be Published].

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC

Announcement of Additional Meeting: Additional Meeting (Week of January 
8, 2007).
    A Closed Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, January 11, 2007 
at 10 a.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matter will attend the Closed Meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), 
(7), (9)(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at 
the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Campos as duty officer, voted to consider the item 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
January 11, 2007 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive 
action.

[[Page 1568]]

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 9, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-113 Filed 1-9-07; 4:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-16 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Majority ) 

Committee PAC ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election Commission, 

do hereby certify that on May 13,2016, the Commission decided by a vote of 6-

0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Majority Committee PAC, as 

recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the 

Audit Division dated May 10,2016. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

ij ytih 

bate ' %hdley E. Ot 

Deputy Secretly of the Commission
#### State *vs.*S. W. Allen et al.

January Term, 1899.

Present: Taft, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed May 11, 1899.

*Listers.*— V. S. 2992, which provides that if a lister after accepting the office does not perform its duties, he shall be fined one hundred dollars, applies to a failure to take up or carry on the general duties of the office, and not to single instances of failure to perform the whole duty of lister, such as the omission to file the tax inventories with the town clerk for preservation, as required by Y. S. 440.

Indictment. Demurrer. At the September term, 1898, Essex county, *Taft,*J., presiding, a *proforma*judgment was rendered overruling the demurrer and holding the indictment sufficient. The respondent excepted.

*324
      *H. W. Lund,*State’s Attorney, for the State.

*George N. Dale*and *Bates, May & Simonds*for the respondents.

Start, J.

It is charged by the indictment that the respondents, as listers of the town of Maidstone, neglected and refused to lodge the inventories of the several taxpayers of the town of Maidstone in the town clerk’s office, on or before June 1, 1896.

This neglect and refusal is not an offense against the criminal law, unless it is made so by Y. S. 2992, which provides, that, if a lister, after accepting the office, does not perform its duties, he shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars. Y. S. 440, provides that the inventories filled out by the tax-payers and taken up by the listers shall, on or before the first day of June in the year in which they are taken up, be lodged in the office of the town clerk, where they shall be preserved for a period of three years from such first day of June, and, after the expiration of such period, they may be destroyed by the clerk. It will be noticed that this section does not provide that it shall be the duty of the listers, or any of them, to thus lodge the inventories in the office of the town clerk. But, assuming that it was intended that this duty should be performed by the board of listers, or that each lister should lodge in the town clerk’s office the inventories taken up by him, we think an offense against § 2992 is not alleged. It was not intended that a lister who entered upon and continued in the performance of the duties of the office should be subjected to a fine of one hundred dollars, if, in a single instance, he failed to perform his whole duty; nor was it intended that he should forfeit a like sum for every shortage of duty. If a lister, accepting the office, does nothing more, or if, after accepting the office and entering upon the performance of its duties, he stops and does not continue in the performance of its duties, he subjects himself to the penalty provided for in this section, *325and not otherwise. It is not alleged in the indictment that the respondents, after accepting the office, did not enter upon and continue in the performance of its duties; and, for want of such allegation, it must be held insufficient.

*Exceptions sustained; indictment adjudged insufficient and quashed; respondents discharged.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1539 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1539

  To amend title 40, United States Code, to add certain Armed Forces 
organizations that are exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(19) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the list of organizations eligible 
       for donations of personal property through State agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2009

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 40, United States Code, to add certain Armed Forces 
organizations that are exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(19) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the list of organizations eligible 
       for donations of personal property through State agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN ARMED FORCES ORGANIZATIONS FOR 
              DONATIONS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY THROUGH STATE AGENCIES.

    Section 549(c)(3)(B) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (viii);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (ix) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(x) An organization described in section 
                        501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
                        (relating to a post or organization of past or 
                        present members of the Armed Forces of the 
                        United States) and exempt from taxation under 
                        section 501(a) of such Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In die Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Nader for President 

2008 (NFP) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werdi, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on August 03,2011, tfae Commission 

decided by a vote of 5-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Nader for President 2008 (NFP), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and die Audit Division dated 

July 22,2011. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn n, Petersen, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for tfae decision. Conunissioner Walther did not vote. 

Attest: 

y Date ' Shawn Woodfaead Wertib / 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commissio C;ommissi< n
§ 2522.460 To what extent may the Corporation or a State commission consider priorities other than those stated in these regulations or the Notice of Funding Availability? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) The Corporation may give special consideration to a national service program submitted by a State commission that does not meet one of the Corporation's priorities if the State commission adequately explains why the State is not able to carry out a program that meets one of the Corporation's priorities, and why the program meets one of the State's priorities.
( b ) A State may apply priorities different than those of the Corporation in selecting its formula programs.
[70 FR 39600, July 8, 2005]
#### Ella H. Leffmann, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.

*Leffmann*v. *Long Island It. JR. Go.,*120 App. Div. 528, affirmed.

(Argued November 22, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the -Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *514June 28, 1907, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial in an action to restrain the operation of the defendant’s railroad upon an elevated structure in front of plaintiff’s premises.

*George C. Lay*and *Charles S. Taber*for appellant.

*Edward M. Shepard*and *Joseph F. Keany*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts, on opinion of Miller, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ.
§ 2554.40 How are penalty and assessment amounts determined? ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the authority head, upon appeal, should evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Because of the intangible costs of fraud, the expense of investigating such conduct, and the need to deter others who might be similarly tempted, ordinarily double damages and a significant civil penalty should be imposed.
( b ) Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence that ALJ and the authority head in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct (i.e., the false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements) charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements;
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made;
( 3 ) The degree of the defendant's culpability with respect to the misconduct;
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed;
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the costs of investigation;
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss;
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon national defense, public health or safety, or public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations, including particularly the impact on the intended beneficiaries of such programs;
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct;
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct;
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it;
( 11 ) Where the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude such misconduct;
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct;
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers;
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions;
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the Government of the United States or of a State, directly or indirectly; and
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the authority head from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
#### § 503.29 Requests for information.

Requests to the Commission for information about the time, place, and subject matter of a meeting, whether it or any portions thereof are closed to the public, and any requests for copies of the transcript or minutes or of a transcript of an electronic recording of a closed meeting, or closed portion of a meeting, to the extent not exempt from disclosure by the provisions of § 503.24, must be addressed to the Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW, Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579, telephone (202) 616-6975.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Report on waste burial charges[electronic resource]: escalation of decommissioning waste disposal costs atlow-level waste burial facilities.**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:10-11/

Item Number:1051-H-51 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000815947
 
Revisions: 0510111214151617
 
March 20, 2020