alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 113 

Recognizing the need for greater access to rural and agricultural media 

programming. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2023 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LUMMIS, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the need for greater access to rural and 

agricultural media programming. 

Whereas individuals living in rural areas in the United States 

need access to media content that is relevant to their 

daily lives; 

Whereas rural and agricultural programming includes agricultural weather, agribusiness news, commodity market 

news, and western sports, and this programming is important to the farmers and ranchers of the United States 

for their way of life and making a living; 

Whereas rural and agricultural programming covers matters 

that affect all individuals in the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 113 IS 

Whereas all individuals in the United States need to be exposed to, and informed about, what is occurring outside 

of the major cities and suburbs of the United States; 

Whereas all individuals in the United States feel the effects 

of inflation and supply chain shortages, and rural and 

agricultural programming is in a unique position to inform viewers of the roots of these issues; 

Whereas the population of the world is projected to grow 

from 7,000,000,000 to approximately 9,000,000,000 by 

2050, and agricultural productivity will need to increase 

to meet the growing demand for food and the projected 

increase in consumption; 

Whereas a decrease in investment in agricultural research 

and development would result in a negative shock to agricultural productivity; 

Whereas an informed public is key to supporting the proper 

level of investment in agricultural research and development; 

Whereas significant consolidation in the media market and 

prioritization of consolidated media has had a negative 

impact on access to rural and agricultural programming; 

and 

Whereas multichannel video programming distributors and 

providers of digital and streaming media should make delivery of rural and agricultural programming, including 

agricultural news and western lifestyle content, a priority: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the importance 

2 of rural and agricultural programming and the need for 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 113 IS 

1 greater access to rural and agricultural media program2 ming. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED


ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS


PCAOB
REGISTERED













CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K/A of Znomics, Inc. (A
Development Stage Enterprise) of our report dated July 16, 2008 on our audit of
the restated financial statements of Znomics, Inc. (A Development Stage
Enterprise) as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related
restated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the period from
inception on September 13, 2001 through December 31, 2007, and the reference to
us under the caption “Experts.”








/s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered


Moore
& Associates Chartered


Las
Vegas, Nevada


July 23,
2008










2675 S. Jones Blvd. Suite
109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax
(702)253-7501
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) AI3-05 

Withdrawal and Resubmission - Draft ) 

Final Audit Report (DFAR) - Ted Cruz ) 

for Senate ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on March 23,2017, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Withdrawal and Resubmission - Draft 

Final Audit Report (DFAR) - Ted Cruz for Senate, as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and Audit Division dated 

February 28,2017. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

2 3, ^o/-7 

Date Dayna C. Brown 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
#### § 506.14 “Force hostile to the United States” defined.

*Force hostile to the United States* means any organization or force in Southeast Asia, or any agent or employee thereof, engaged in any military or civil activities designed to further the prosecution of its armed conflict against the Armed Forces of the United States during the Vietnam conflict.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1673 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 with respect 

to bonus payments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2009 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

2008 with respect to bonus payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROVISION. 

4 Section 111(b)(3)(D) of the Emergency Economic 

5 Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5221(b)(3)(D)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘(iii) The prohibition required under 

7 clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus pay8 ment required to be paid pursuant to a written employ9 ment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1673 IH

1 as such valid employment contracts are determined by the 

2 Secretary or the designee of the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### § 1801.24 Selection of Truman Scholars by the Foundation.

The Foundation names Truman Scholars after receiving recommendations from the regional review panels.
#### Tracy W. Pratt, Appellant, v. William I. Clark et al., as. Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Charlotte M. Goodridge, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Pratt*v. *Clark,*118 App. Div. 633, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted June 9, 1909;

decided October *5,*1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 16,1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of certain contracts.

*Samuel Untermeyer*and *Clarence F. Birdseye*for appellant.

*Charles I. McBurney*and *Albert Stickney*for respondents.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, on stipulation of parties; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
§ 153.330 State alternate risk adjustment methodology. ( a ) *State request for alternate methodology certification.* ( 1 ) A State request to HHS for the certification of an alternate risk adjustment methodology must include: ( i ) The elements specified in § 153.320(b);
( ii ) The calibration methodology and frequency of calibration; and
( iii ) The statistical performance metrics specified by HHS.
( 2 ) The request must include the extent to which the methodology: ( i ) Accurately explains the variation in health care costs of a given population;
( ii ) Links risk factors to daily clinical practice and is clinically meaningful to providers;
( iii ) Encourages favorable behavior among providers and health plans and discourages unfavorable behavior;
( iv ) Uses data that is complete, high in quality, and available in a timely fashion;
( v ) Is easy for stakeholders to understand and implement;
( vi ) Provides stable risk scores over time and across plans; and
( vii ) Minimizes administrative costs.
( b ) *Evaluation criteria for alternate risk adjustment methodology.* An alternate risk adjustment methodology will be certified by HHS as a Federally certified risk adjustment methodology based on the following criteria: ( 1 ) The criteria listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
( 2 ) Whether the methodology complies with the requirements of this subpart D;
( 3 ) Whether the methodology accounts for risk selection across metal levels; and
( 4 ) Whether each of the elements of the methodology are aligned.
( c ) *State renewal of alternate methodology.* If a State is operating a risk adjustment program, the State may not implement a recalibrated risk adjustment model or otherwise alter its risk adjustment methodology without first obtaining HHS certification. ( 1 ) Recalibration of the risk adjustment model must be performed at least as frequently as described in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section;
( 2 ) A State request to implement a recalibrated risk adjustment model or otherwise alter its risk adjustment methodology must include any changes to the parameters described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
[77 FR 17248, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15528, Mar. 11, 2013]
§ 400.27 Safeguarding and sharing of information. ( a ) Except for purposes directly connected with, and necessary to, the administration of the program, a State must ensure that no information about, or obtained from, an individual and in possession of any agency providing assistance or services to such individual under the plan, will be disclosed in a form identifiable with the individual without the individual's consent, or if the individual is a minor, the consent of his or her parent or guardian.
( b ) The provision by a State to a local resettlement agency or by a local resettlement agency to a State, of information as to whether an individual has applied for or is receiving cash assistance and the individual's address and telephone number is to be considered undertaken for a purpose directly connected with, and necessary to, the administration of the program during the first 36 months after such individual's entry into the United States.
[51 FR 3914, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 5476, Feb. 3, 1989; 65 FR 15443, Mar. 22, 2000]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Henry Elias Brewing Company, Appellant, *v.*Frank Gass, as Register of the County of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Elias Brewing Co.*v. *Gass,*120 App. Div. 147, affirmed.

(Argued January 6, 1908;

decided January 21, 1908.)

Appeal from an order of Appelláte Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 7, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to record a certain mortgage on leases without the payment of a recording tax.

*Arthur B. Hyman*and *Martin Paskus*for appellant.

*William 8.*Jackson, *Attorney-General (James A. Donnelly*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ,
Order entered October 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00801-CV

JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant

V.

JUDGE PAUL MCNULTY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-01611-2015

ORDER

Because it appears from a review of Collin County’s online records that the trial court has 

dismissed the underlying action, we ORDER Collin County District Clerk Andrea Stroh 

Thompson to file, no later than October 19, 2015, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a 

copy of the August 17, 2015 order of dismissal.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Thompson and all 

parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### § 2523.50 What types of funds are Federal agencies eligible to receive?

Federal agencies may apply for planning and operating funds subject to the terms established by the Corporation in § 2521.20 of this chapter, except that operating grants will be awarded with the expectation that the Federal agencies will support the proposed programs from their own budgets once the Corporation grant(s) expire.
Rockingham,

No. 5744.

#### Haverhill Journal *v.*Southwick Construction Co.

Argued May 7, 1968.

Decided May 29, 1968.

*Shute & Engel*for the plaintiff, filed no brief.

*John L. Southwick, Jr.,*attorney in fact ( by brief and orally ), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

Assumpsit for advertising space furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant from October 19, 1962, to August 8, 1963. After the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (RSA 491:8-a (supp)) had been denied upon the defendant’s filing an amended affidavit of defense, there was a hearing upon the merits before a Judicial Referee *(Blandin,*J.), who returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $387. The defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by the Superior Court *(Morris,*J.).

The reserved case shows that the plaintiff’s credit manager testified and introduced exhibits tending to prove that the advertising was furnished and that the amount due the plaintiff was $387, die same figure as claimed in its specification and awarded by the Judicial Referee.

Upon the record before us, including the reserved case containing the pleadings and the defendant’s bill of exceptions, and in the absence of any transcript of the evidence, we find no errors. It follows that the defendant’s exceptions are overruled. *Ray*v. *Sanborn,*99 N. H. 438; *Gobbi*v. *Moulton,*108 N. H. 183, 186.

The order is

*Judgment on the verdict.*
§ 618.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 618.550.
#### § 2544.120 What personal services from a volunteer may be solicited and accepted?

A donation in the form of personal services from a volunteer may be solicited and accepted to assist the Corporation in carrying out its duties. However, volunteers may not perform an inherently governmental function.
Conservative Campaign Committee 

September 5, 2016 

Federal Election Commission 

Audit Division 

Rickida Morcomb 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: Conservative Campaign Committee 

Dear Ms Pacious: 

Thank you for your patience in my reply to the DFAR and audit findings. 

Reporting of Apparent Expenditures 

The items in question were for fundraising purposes and not electioneering and did not require being 

reported as Independent expenditure. 

Regarding items not timely filed. It is our goal to comply and timely file. We have tightened procedures 

to insure that future items are timely filed and have discussed with the committees consultants how we 

can improve the communication of their work to myself the treasurer. 

Record keeping for Communications 

We have made improvements to our recordkeeping procedures for items. 

I have included copies of invoices from Frontline Strategies and Media that show their invoices totaling 

$172,492.72. These were for fundraising commission and not communications. 

11/26/2012 $14,100.26 

11/15/2012 $61,997.30 

10/26/2012 $15,368.50 

10/9/2012 $34,842.00 

9/25/2012 $11,016.00 

6/7/2012 $33,241.16 

10/5/2011 $1,927.50 

Items lists in the Audit findings supplement for Travel totaled $8,926. None of those items were for 

communications or electioneering. They were for travel for consultants. 
Conservative Campaign Committee 

I have also included invoices for strategic consulting and fundraising consulting for Ryan that were not 

for media or communications. These invoices total $23,200. 

Sincerely, 

r~ 

Kelly Lawler 

Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Cleantech Transit, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended October 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth Bosket, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)), as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:  October 31, 2012





/s/ Kenneth Bosket


Kenneth Bosket


Chief Executive Officer, President


(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1597 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1597

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

 Mr. Matheson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is repealed.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such 
Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection'' and inserting ``adjusted as provided by law''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on December 31, 
2010.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

## Board Votes To Close February 27, 2007 Meeting

By telephone vote on February 27, 2007, the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Board determined that prior public notice was not possible.

*Item Considered:*                     Postal Regulatory Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in Docket No. R2006-1, Postal Rate and Fee Changes.                

*General Counsel Certification:*                     The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Wendy A. Hocking, at (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-1066  Filed 3-2-07; 1:58 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-068-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)