alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June10, 2015 

Mr. Ryan Shust 

5024 S.W. 92nd Avenue 

Cooper City, FL 33328 

 

Dear Mr. Shust: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 14, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1654), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 
2 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Baxter *v.*Davenport, Appellant.

*Costs—Rule for costs—Nonresident—Discharge of rule.*

When the court makes absolute a rule for judgment for part of plaintiff’s claim with leave to proceed for the balance, and at the same time discharges a rule on plaintiff as a nonresident to enter security for costs, and the defendant on appeal secures a reversal of the order for judgment, but takes no appeal from the order as to costs, the defendant will not be entitled, as matter of absolute right, to maintain a second rule to enter security for costs inasmuch as the former rule on the subject was unappealed from and unreversed.

Argued Oct. 15, 1914.

Appeal, No. 102, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1913, No. 3,349, discharging rule to enter security for costs in case of Charles E. Baxter v. John Davenport.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule on nonresident to enter security for costs.

*Error assigned*was order discharging the rule.

*John Weaver,*for appellant.

*Frederick A. Sobernheimer,*for appellee.

December 7, 1914:

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The plaintiff obtained a rule on the defendant for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense as to a portion of his claim with leave to proceed for the balance. The court made absolute the rule and on the same day discharged the defendant’s rule on plaintiff as a nonresident to enter security for costs. The defendant appealed, assigning for error the first mentioned order but not the second and obtained a reversal of the judgment. (See Baxter v. Davenport, 55 Pa. Superior Ct. 602.) After the record had been returned *519he obtained a second rule on the plaintiff to show cause why he should not give security for costs. An answer was filed by the plaintiff setting up the entry' of the former rule and its discharge after answer filed and argument. In view of this adjudication which stood unreversed and unappealed from it is quite clear that the defendant was not in position to demand as matter of right that his second rule should be made absolute. To say the least it was as fully within the discretionary power of the court to refuse to make it absolute as it would have been to refuse to reopen the former adjudication.

The order is affirmed at the costs of the appellant. The defendant’s motion for imposition of penalty is denied.
EXHIBIT 35.2




                                                                    EXHIBIT 35.2

                             [JPMorganChase] [LOGO]

                          SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
             WITH RESPECT TO THE INDENTURE ("THE INDENTURE") FOR THE
                       HARTFORD LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING TRUST
                              [2006-068 - 2006-096]
        FOR THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 (THE "REPORTING PERIOD")


        I, Joseph Giordano, being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., either as the Indenture Trustee (the "Indenture Trustee") or
as Paying Agent and Registrar under the Indenture delivered with respect to the
Global Funding Trust described above, do hereby certify, on behalf of the
Indenture Trustee or Paying Agent and Registrar with respect to its activities
as servicer under the Indenture (the "Servicer"), that:

        1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and
of its performance under the Indenture has been made under my supervision.

        2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Indenture in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.



Dated: September 06, 2007





                            JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
                            as Servicer under the Indenture




                            By: /s/ Joseph Giordano
                                ------------------------------
                                Joseph Giordano
                                Sr. Vice President
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

IRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 6, 1993 

F ADJ0t:RNED:-IOVEMBER24, 1993 

SECOND SESSION { CONVENEIJJANUARY26, 1994 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, March 9, 1994 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTERJ. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex.REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUB.IECI' BY 
2 

TREATIES 

- CALENDAR TREATY REPOJrrED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

-

16 103-16 Protocol to the Tax Convention with the State of Nov 18 93 Reported favorably by 

Israel Mr. P~ll, Coi:rumttee on Foreign 

Relations, with a resolution of 

advice and consent to ratification 

with an understanding and a 

declaration. Printed report (Ex. 

Rept. 103-21). 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

* 321 363 Everett M. Ehrlich, of Pennsylvania, t.o be Under Aug 3, 93 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs, Hollings, Committee on 

vice Jose Antonio Villamil, resigned. Commerce, Science, and 

Transport.a.ti.on, without printed 

report. 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

* 692 876-1 Ricki Rhodarmer Tigert, of Tennessee, t.o be a Feb 10, 94 Reported by Mr. Riegle, 

Member of the Board of Directors of the Committee on Banking, Housing, 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for a and Urban Affairs, without 

tenn ofsix years, vice William Taylor. printed report. 

* 693 876-2 Ricki Rhodarmer Tigert, of Tennessee, t.o be Feb 10, 94 Reported by Mr. Riegle, 

Chairperson of the Board of Direct.ors of the Committee on Banking, Housing, 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for a and Urban Affairs, without 

term of five years, vice William Taylor. printed report. 

* 694 1002-1 Andrew C. Hove, Jr., of Nebraska, to be a Feb 10, 94 Reported by Mr. Riegle, 

Member of the Board ofDirect.ors of the Committee on Banking, Housing, 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for a and Urban Affairs, without 

term of six years. (Reappointment) printed report. 

* 695 1002-2 Andrew C. Hove, Jr., of Nebraska, t.o be Vice Feb 10, 94 Reported by Mr. Riegle, 

Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Committee on Banking, Housing, 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. and Urban Affairs, without 

(Reappointment) printed report. 

* 696 1003 Anne L. Hall, of Ohio, t.o be a Member of the Feb 10, 94 Reported by Mr. Riegle, 

Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Committee on Banking, Housing, 

Insurance Corporation for a term of six years, and Urban Affairs, without 

vice C. C. Hope, Jr. printed report. 

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION 

* 717 1094 Linda Joan Morgan, of Maryland, to be a Member Feb 24, 94 Reported by Mr. 

of the Interstate Commerce Commission for a Hollings, Committee on 

term expiring December 31, 1998, vice Edward Commerce, Science, and 

J. Philbin, term expired. Transport.a.ti.on, without printed 

report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee oftlie Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
#### Charles D. Fox, Appellant, *v.*Bessie F. Smith, Respondent.

*Fox*v. *Smith,*133 App. Riv. 369, reversed.

(Argued December 1, 1909;

decided December 17, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 10, 1908, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*Henry C. Burnstine*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Wing*for respondent.

*528Judgmént reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Clarke, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Oil. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Dissenting: Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Chase, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals for research to be conducted or supported by a Federal department or agency. ( a ) The department or agency head will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Federal department or agency through such officers and employees of the Federal department or agency and such experts and consultants as the department or agency head determines to be appropriate. This evaluation will take into consideration the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
( b ) On the basis of this evaluation, the department or agency head may approve or disapprove the application or proposal, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one.
§ 307.0 Scope of this part. This part implements sections 452(d) and (e), 454(16) and (24), 454A, and 455(a)(1)(A) and (B), and (a)(3)(A) of the Act which prescribe: ( a ) The requirement for computerized support enforcement systems;
( b ) The functional requirements that a statewide computerized support enforcement system must meet;
( c ) Security and confidentiality requirements for computerized support enforcement systems;
( d ) The criteria the Office must determine exist prior to approving an advance planning document (APD);
( e ) The requirements and procedures for the submittal of an APD;
( f ) The requirement for continuous review of each approved statewide computerized support enforcement system;
( g ) The availability of FFP at the 90 percent rate;
( h ) The availability of FFP at the applicable matching rate; and
( i ) The conditions under which the Office will suspend approval of an APD.
[57 FR 47002, Oct. 14, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 44814, Aug. 21, 1998]
§ 170.213 United States Core Data for Interoperability. The Secretary adopts the following versions of the United States Core Data for Interoperability standard: ( a ) *Standard.* United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI), July 2020 Errata, Version 1 (v1) (incorporated by reference, see § 170.299). The adoption of this standard expires on January 1, 2026.
( b ) *Standard.* United States Core Data for Interoperability Version 3 (USCDI v3) (incorporated by reference, see § 170.299).
[89 FR 1428, Jan. 9, 2024]
## ***Exhibit 32.1***

## * *

## ***CERTIFICATION***

## * *

CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dominic Ng, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

 

(a)          the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)         the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  May 11,2009

 

 
|   | /s/  DOMINIC NG                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Dominic  Ng                                   |
|   | President &  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 410.1106 Unaccompanied children who need particular services and treatment.

ORR shall assess each unaccompanied child in its care to determine whether the unaccompanied child requires particular services and treatment by staff to address their individualized needs while in the care and custody of the UC Program. An unaccompanied child's assessed needs may require particular services, equipment, and treatment by staff for various reasons, including, but not limited to disability, alcohol or substance use, a history of serious neglect or abuse, tender age, pregnancy, or parenting. If ORR determines that an unaccompanied child's individualized needs require particular services and treatment by staff or particular equipment, ORR shall place the unaccompanied child, whenever possible, in a standard program in which the unaccompanied child with individualized needs can interact with children without those individualized needs to the fullest extent possible, but which provides services and treatment or equipment for such individualized needs.
**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**





**GE-WMC
      Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-1**





The
      undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual Statement
      as
      to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above
      referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
      Servicer during such preceding calendar year (or such shorter period in the
      case
      of the first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been
      made
      under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
      review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement
      in
      all material respects for 2007.




Date:  March
      3,
      2008







/s/ Elizabeth
      Folk


Elizabeth Folk


Senior Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


Litton Loan Servicing LP
§ 411.11 Zero tolerance toward sexual abuse and sexual harassment; Prevention of Sexual Abuse Coordinator and Compliance Manager. ( a ) ORR must have a written policy mandating zero tolerance toward all forms of sexual abuse and sexual harassment and outlining ORR's approach to preventing, detecting, and responding to such conduct. ORR must ensure that all policies and services related to this rule are implemented in a culturally-sensitive and knowledgeable manner that is tailored for a diverse population.
( b ) ORR must employ or designate an upper-level, ORR-wide Prevention of Sexual Abuse Coordinator (PSA Coordinator) with sufficient time and authority to develop, implement, and oversee ORR efforts to comply with these standards in all of its care provider facilities.
( c ) Care provider facilities must have a written policy mandating zero tolerance toward all forms of sexual abuse and sexual harassment and outlining the care provider facility's approach to preventing, detecting, and responding to such conduct. The care provider facility also must ensure that all policies and services related to this rule are implemented in a culturally-sensitive and knowledgeable manner that is tailored for a diverse population. ORR will review and approve each care provider facility's written policy.
( d ) Care provider facilities must employ or designate a Prevention of Sexual Abuse Compliance Manager (PSA Compliance Manager) with sufficient time and authority to develop, implement, and oversee the care provider facility's efforts to comply with the provisions set forth in this part and serve as a point of contact for ORR's PSA Coordinator.
#### New York Attrition Pulverizing Company v. Van Tuyl, appellant.

*Beference—when not compellable.*

An action to restrain the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage, *held*not referable without the consent of the parties.

Appeal from an order at special term continuing an injunction and ordering a reference. The action was brought against Andrew P. Van Tuyl and another to restrain the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage.

*Dana & QlarJcson,*for appellants.

*Gyrus Lawton,*for respondent.

Davis, P. J.

The only point of any materiality passed upon is given in the head-note.

*Order conditionally affirmed*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1524 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1524

 To allow flood insurance coverage under the national flood insurance 
 program for new structures designed to protect public safety that are 
                 located in special flood hazard zones.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2009

  Ms. Matsui introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow flood insurance coverage under the national flood insurance 
 program for new structures designed to protect public safety that are 
                 located in special flood hazard zones.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Safety Enhancement Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION OF INSURANCE FOR PROPERTIES IN 
              VIOLATION OF STATE AND LOCAL LAWS REGARDING DEVELOPMENT 
              IN FLOOD-PRONE AREAS.

    Section 1316 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4023) is amended by inserting ``, other than a structure that is used 
in providing a public safety or first responder service, which shall 
include police and firefighting services,'' after ``for any property''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 507.1 Payments under the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended by Public Law 91-289. ( a ) Upon a determination by the Commission as to the amount and validity of each claim filed pursuant to section 5(i) and 6(f) of the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended, any award made thereunder will be certified by the Commission to the Secretary of the Treasury for payment out of funds appropriated for this purpose, in favor of the civilian internee or prisoner of war found entitled thereto.
( b ) Awards made to survivors of deceased civilian internees or prisoners of war will be certified to the Secretary of the Treasury for payment to the individual member or members of the class or classes of survivors entitled to receive compensation in the full amount of the share to which each survivor is entitled, and if applicable, under the procedure set forth in § 507.3, except that as to persons under legal disability, payment will be made as specified in § 507.2.
§ 411.82 Corrective actions for contractors and volunteers. ( a ) Any contractor or volunteer with a substantiated allegation of sexual abuse or sexual harassment against him/her must be prohibited from working or volunteering at the care provider facility and at any ORR care provider facility.
( b ) The care provider facility must take appropriate remedial measures and must consider whether to prohibit further contact with UCs by contractors or volunteers who have not engaged in sexual abuse or sexual harassment but violated other provisions within these standards, ORR sexual abuse and sexual harassment policies and procedures, or the care provider's sexual abuse and sexual harassment policies and procedures.
#### § 212.2 General.

The Assistant Secretary shall develop plans and make arrangements for provision of temporary assistance within the United States to any eligible person, after consultation with appropriate offices of the Department of State, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Defense. Temporary assistance shall be provided, to the extent feasible, in accordance with such plans, as modified from time to time by the Assistant Secretary. The Assistant Secretary shall enter into agreements with agencies whose services and facilities are to be utilized for the purpose of providing temporary assistance pursuant to the Act, specifying the conditions governing the provision of such assistance and the manner of payment of the cost of providing therefor.

[39 FR 26548, July 19, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 19864, Apr. 21, 1995]
#### Catherine D. Turner, Appellant, *v.*Helen E. Quillin et al., Defendants, and Philander B. Pierson, Respondent.

*Turners. Quillin,*131 App. Div. 930, affirmed.

(Argued January 26, 1910;

decided February 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 1, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action for partition.

*Richard Krause*and *David B. Melick*for appellant.

*Stephen H. Little*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  December 5, 2005                         /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                                ---------------------
                                                Daniel B. O'Brien
                                                Chief Financial Officer