alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Annual Servicer Compliance Certificate
pursuant to
Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement
and
Item 1123 of Regulation AB

|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|                            
|USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST 2006-3
|                            
|                            

The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank, as
servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2006 (as amended and supplemented, or
otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing
Agreement), by and among USAA Auto Owner Trust 2006-3, USAA Acceptance,
LLC and the Servicer, does hereby certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | A review of
  the activities of the Servicer during the period from August 22, 2006 through
  December 31, 2006, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing
  Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | To the best
  of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
  obligations in all material respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
  throughout such period.                  

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the
Servicer this 30th day of March, 2007.

| |                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ FRITZ D.
  BOHNE                             
| |                                                  
| |                                                  
| | Name: Fritz
  D. Bohne                           
| | Title: Vice
  President, Senior Financial Officer

---
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

JUN 2 0 2016 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Onock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

AdavNoti^i^ 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

Lorenzo Holloway -s 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

DanitaCAlberico ^ 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Draft Fiiud Audit Report on Ted Lieu for Congress (LRA 1010) 

The OfSce of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report C*DFAR") 

on Ted Lieu for Congress. The DFAR contains one finding on the Misstatement of Financial 

Activity. We concur with the finding. If you have any questions, please contact Danita Alberico, 

the attorney assigned to this audit.
* The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-4017

___________ Nathan E. Douglas, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 24, 2002 Filed: May 28, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nathan E. Douglas appeals the district court's * dismissal of Douglas's action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits. An administrative law judge decided that an earlier determination could not be reopened because it was issued more than four years ago, and res judicata barred-2- consideration of the present application. The district court dismissed Douglas's action because 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) does not allow judicial review of decisions to dismiss claims based on res judicata. After de novo review, see Boock v. Shalala , 48 F.3d 348, 351 & n.2 (8th Cir. 1995), we agree with the district court. We have recognized only two exceptions to the general rule prohibiting judicial review of decisions denying applications on the basis of res judicata. See Yeazel v. Apfel , 148 F.3d 910, 911-12 (8th Cir. 1998). We conclude neither exception applies here. First, we do not believe the Commissioner reopened the earlier determination as a matter of administrative discretion. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.988(b)-(c), 416.1488(c) (2001); Burkes-Marshall v. Shalala , 7 F.3d 1346, 1348 & n.6 (8th Cir. 1993). Second, we conclude Douglas has not presented a colorable constitutional claim related to either his alleged mental impairment, see Boock , 48 F.3d at 352, or the lack of a hearing concerning the earlier determination, see Yeazel , 148. F.3d at 912. We affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 400.3 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Receivership of the Syracuse, Chenango and New York Railroad Company.

’Motion to dismiss the

appeal denied, with ten dollars costs. Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss the petition granted, with ten dollars costs. *Per O-v/riam*opinions filed, with the clerk of Monroe.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 June 26, 2018 

MEMORANDUM

TO: Patricia C. Orrock

 Chief Compliance Officer

 Thomas E. Hintermister

 Assistant Staff Director

 Audit Division

FROM: Erin Chlopak 

 Acting Associate General Counsel

 Policy Division

 Lorenzo Holloway 

 Assistant General Counsel 

 Compliance Advice 

Joshua Blume 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Resubmitted Interim Audit Report on Tony Cardenas for Congress (LRA 1074) 

 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Resubmitted Interim Audit Report 

(“Resubmitted IAR”) on Tony Cardenas for Congress (“the Committee”). The Resubmitted IAR 

contains two findings: Misstatement of Financial Activity (Finding 1) and Receipt of 

Contributions in Excess of the Limit (Finding 2). We concur with both findings. Should you 

have any questions, please contact Joshua Blume, the attorney assigned to this audit.
§ 286.230 What if a Tribe does not have reasonable cause for failing to meet a requirement? ( a ) To avoid the imposition of a penalty under § 286.195(a)(1), § 286.195(a)(2), or § 286.195(a)(3), under the following circumstances a Tribe must enter into a corrective compliance plan to correct the violation: ( 1 ) If a Tribe does not claim reasonable cause for failing to meet a requirement; or
( 2 ) If we found that a Tribe did not have reasonable cause.
( b ) A Tribe that does not claim reasonable cause will have 60 days from receipt of the notice described in § 286.220(a) to submit its corrective compliance plan to us.
( c ) A Tribe that does not demonstrate reasonable cause will have 60 days from receipt of the second notice described in § 286.220(d) to submit its corrective compliance plan to us.
( d ) In its corrective compliance plan the Tribe must outline: ( 1 ) Why it failed to meet the requirements;
( 2 ) How it will correct the violation in a timely manner; and
( 3 ) What actions, outcomes and time line it will use to ensure future compliance.
( e ) During the 60-day period beginning with the date we receive the corrective compliance plan, we may, if necessary, consult with the Tribe on modifications to the plan.
( f ) A corrective compliance plan is deemed to be accepted if we take no action to accept or reject the plan during the 60-day period that begins when the plan is received.
( g ) Once a corrective compliance plan is accepted or deemed accepted, we may request reports from the Tribe or take other actions to confirm that the Tribe is carrying out the corrective actions specified in the plan. ( 1 ) We will not impose a penalty against a Tribe with respect to any violation covered by that plan if the Tribe corrects the violation within the time frame agreed to in the plan.
( 2 ) We must assess some or all of the penalty if the Tribe fails to correct the violation pursuant to its corrective compliance plan.
Exhibit 10.1


 


APPENDIX 1


 


Atakam Group Inc.


 


List of assets


 


		1.	Website (currently forwarded to a new domain bluewaterpetroleum.com).



 


		2.	Equipped office at 1103 Old Town Ln, Ste 16, Cheyenne, WY 82009.



 


		3.	Telephone / fax lines with IVR.



 


		4.	Fully established certified engineering documentation for Thermal Destruction Plants:



 


		a.	TDP 2-200. Certificate of conformity from TUV Nord (Germany).



		b.	TDP 2-800. Certificate of conformity from TUV Nord (Germany).



		c.	TDP 2-2000. Certificate of conformity from TUV Nord (Germany).



 


		5.	Strategic partnership agreement with Pyrolysis Technology Group SIA.



 


		6.	Customer’s reference list of Pyrolysis Technology Group SIA.



 


		7.	Business Plan for tire recycling plant.



 


		8.	Eurasia Patent organization (EAPO). Patent #030255. Publications:

(43) 2016.07.29

(86) PCT/RU2015/000422

(87) WO 2017/007361 2017.01.12



 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	4
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kevin B. Epp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Centrus Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                    



| | By:    | */s/ Kevin B. Epp*         
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | KEVIN B. EPP               
| |        |                            
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | July 27, 2007              



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
§ 160.304 Principles for achieving compliance. ( a ) *Cooperation.* The Secretary will, to the extent practicable and consistent with the provisions of this subpart, seek the cooperation of covered entities and business associates in obtaining compliance with the applicable administrative simplification provisions.
( b ) *Assistance.* The Secretary may provide technical assistance to covered entities and business associates to help them comply voluntarily with the applicable administrative simplification provisions.
[78 FR 5690, Jan. 25, 2013]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0419. NUBIYN MZEKEWE v. LESLIE S. SPIVEY et al.

In this action for trespass, nuisance, and related claims, the trial court granted

summary judgment to the defendants in an order entered on February 9, 2024. On

Tuesday, March 12, 2024, plaintiff Nubiyn Mzekewe filed a notice of appeal.We lack

jurisdiction. A notice of appeal must be filed “within 30 days after entry” of the trial

court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing

of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer appellate jurisdiction on this

Court. Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012).

Mzekewe’s notice of appeal was untimely filed 32 days after entry of the February 9

order.1

 Consequently, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1While Mzekewe asserts in his notice of appeal that the order he seeks to appeal

“was not delivered” until February 13, 2024, it was stamped “filed” by the superior

court clerk on February 9. See Sharp v. State, 183 Ga.App. 641, 642 (1) (360 SE2d 50)

(1987) (an order is “entered” for purposes of OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) when “it is reduced

to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk”).

October 04, 2024

10/04/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9914]

[[Page 78517]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Office of the Thrift Supervision

[AC-06: OTS Nos. 01427, H4049, H4050, and H4348]

Osage Federal Bank, Osage Federal MHC, Osage Federal Financial, 
Inc., and Osage Bancshares, Inc., Pawhuska, Oklahoma; Approval of 
Conversion Application.

    Notice is hereby given that on November 9, 2006, the Assistant 
Managing Director, Examinations and Supervision--Operations, Office of 
Thrift Supervision (OTS), or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated 
authority, approved the application of osage Federal MHC and Osage 
Federal Bank, Pawhuska, Oklahoma, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by 
appointment phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail: 
[email protected]) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Midwest Regional Office, 225 East 
John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 500, Irving, TX 75062-2731.

    Dated: December 22, 2006.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 06-9914 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```
**
**Exhibit 8.1**

**Vedanta Limited**

**Subsidiaries of Vedanta Limited**

 
**Subsidiaries**  **Country of Incorporation**Cairn Energy India Pty Limited*  AustraliaCopper Mines of Tasmania Pty Limited (“CMT”)  AustraliaThalanga Copper Mines Pty Limited (“TCM”)  AustraliaBharat Aluminium Company Limited (“BALCO”)  IndiaElectrosteel Steels Limited2  IndiaGoa Sea Port Private Limited  IndiaHindustan Zinc Limited (“HZL”)  IndiaMALCO Energy Limited (“MEL”)  IndiaMaritime Ventures Private Limited  IndiaParadip Multi Cargo Berth Private Limited  IndiaSesa Mining Corporation Limited  IndiaSesa Resources Limited (“SRL”)  IndiaSterlite Ports Limited  IndiaTalwandi Sabo Power Limited (“TSPL”)  IndiaVedanta Star Limited2  IndiaVizag General Cargo Berth Private Limited  IndiaKilloran Lisheen Finance Limited  IrelandKilloran Lisheen Mining Limited  IrelandLisheen Milling Limited  IrelandLisheen Mine Partnership  IrelandVedanta Exploration Ireland Limited  IrelandVedanta Lisheen Holdings Limited  IrelandVedanta Lisheen Mining Limited  IrelandAvanStrate Inc. (‘ASI’)  JapanCairn India Holdings Limited  JerseyWestern Cluster Limited  LiberiaBloom Fountain Limited  MauritiusCIG Mauritius Holdings Private Limited  MauritiusCIG Mauritius Private Limited  MauritiusSesa Sterlite Mauritius Holdings Limited (“SSMHL”)***  MauritiusTHL Zinc Ltd  MauritiusTHL Zinc Ventures Limited  MauritiusTwin Star Energy Holdings Limited (“TEHL”)***  MauritiusTwin Star Mauritius Holdings Limited (“TMHL”)***  MauritiusAmica Guesthouse (Proprietary) Limited  NamibiaNamzinc (Proprietary) Limited  NamibiaSkorpion Mining Company (Proprietary) Limited (‘NZ’)  NamibiaSkorpion Zinc (Proprietary) Limited (‘SZPL’)  NamibiaTHL Zinc Namibia Holdings (Proprietary) Limited (“VNHL”)  NamibiaLakomasko BV  NetherlandsMonte Cello BV (“MCBV”)  NetherlandsTHL Zinc Holding BV  NetherlandsCairn Energy Discovery Limited**  ScotlandCairn Energy Gujarat Block 1 Limited  ScotlandCairn Energy Hydrocarbons Limited  Scotland****Cairn Exploration (No. 2) Limited**  ScotlandBlack Mountain Mining (Proprietary) Limited  South AfricaCairn South Africa Pty Limited**  South AfricaAvanStrate Korea Inc  South KoreaCairn Lanka Private Limited  Sri LankaAvanStrate Taiwan Inc  TaiwanFujairah Gold FZC  United Arab EmiratesSterlite (USA) Inc.**  United States of America
 
*
Deregistered subsequent to Balance Sheet date 
**
Under liquidation 
***
Liquidated during the year 
****
Principal place of business is in India 
1)
The Group also has interest in certain trusts which are neither significant nor material to the Group.
2)
Vedanta star Limited has been merged with Electrosteels steel Limited w.e.f. March 25, 2020.
**
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Special Value Continuation Partners, LP (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Howard M. Levkowitz, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Davis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: February 27, 2018/s/ Howard M. LevkowitzHoward M. LevkowitzChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: February 27, 2018/s/ Paul L. DavisPaul L. DavisChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Special Value Continuation Partners, LP and will be retained by Special Value Continuation Partners, LP and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

G-c. YIANW 

.-n .II1UL 

Bonozablo 'zm L. Boauohamp 

Saorrtuy or &ate 

kutin, Torsr 

on to the requireaents 

tatutes of Texas, pnrridand anurndnrnts to oh&n 

8 ot our statutes relstlng to the inion of mob aooletler are Artlolem 

i R&.18*d Civil Statutes. We arm 

in the above statute8 that would 

aorperatlotu do not roqulre the Attorney General to a~- 

~rorm the dlmolution of a corporation. 

You are idvimd that& is the opinion of thlr 

drQart&mt that it la not noaommry for the Attorney Mkn- 
'Eonorable Tom L. Beauhhamp, Page Z 

.eral to appi-ove the diesolution of a farmers1 cooperative 

boOi8tg. 

Yours v&y truly 

ATTORNEX GiMEWU OP TXMl 

By M0RH.S HODGES (si@mdj 

""ESX 

,: 

~xw3cJ 

PPRLIVQ) JrIL:sl, 19m APPROVIFD 

.. -;i, F, MOORB (Signedi 

opinion colmltto* 

~By .R.W.F. 

Chz 

FZFt3T S38TSTANT ATl'C= -RAL
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6867
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH WARRIX, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-191, CA-96-93-3) Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: December 3, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Warrix, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Farrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed therecord and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Warrix , Nos. CR-88-191; CA-96-93-3 (S.D.W. Va. May 20, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 2509.16 How will CNCS make guidance documents available to the public? CNCS shall: ( a ) Ensure all effective guidance documents, identified by a unique identifier which includes, at a minimum, the document's title and date of issuance or revision and its RIN, if applicable, are on its website in a single, searchable, indexed database, and available to the public in accordance with § 2905.16;
( b ) Note on its website that guidance documents lack the force and effect of law, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract; and
( c ) Publish on its website where the public can comment electronically on any guidance documents that are subject to the notice-and-comment procedures described in § 2509.22 and to submit requests electronically for issuance, reconsideration, modification, or rescission of guidance documents.
( d ) Guidance documents that do not appear on the Agency's single, searchable, indexed database are rescinded.
#### § 2522.430 [Reserved]