alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1593 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of Illabot 

Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2009 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

4 SEGMENTS. 

5 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1593 IH

1 ‘‘(ll) ILLABOT CREEK, WASHINGTON.—The 

2 14.3 mile segment from the headwaters of Illabot 

3 Creek to 1,000 feet south of and at no point closer 

4 than 200 feet from the Rockport-Cascade Road, 

5 flowing through lands managed by the U.S. Forest 

6 Service, Washington State Department of Natural 

7 Resources, and Seattle City Light, to be adminis8 tered by the Secretary of Agriculture as follows: 

9 ‘‘(A) The 4.3 mile segment from the head10 waters of Illabot Creek to the boundary of Gla11 cier Peak Wilderness Area as a wild river. 

12 ‘‘(B) The 10 mile segment from the bound13 ary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to 1,000 feet 

14 south of Rockport-Cascade Road as a rec15 reational river.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering, 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and 
Engineering (1173).
    Dates/Time: February 1, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m. and February 
2, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1235 S, Arlington, VA 22304.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
     Contact Person: Dr. Margaret E.M. Tolbert, Senior Advisor and 
Executive Liaison, CEOSE, Office of Integrative Activities, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 292-8040. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef829b80838d8a9d9baf819c89c1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deb3aab1b2bcbbacaa9eb0adb8f0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the Executive Liaison at the above 
address.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning broadening participation in science and engineering.
    Agenda:

Thursday, February 1, 2007

    Welcome and introduction of the New CEOSE Chair by the Outgoing 
CEOSE Chair;
    Opening Statement by the New CEOSE Chair.
    Introductions.
    Presentations and Discussions:
    <bullet> Broadening Participation Initiatives, Issues, and 
Achievements of a Major Office and a Directorate of the National 
Science Foundation
    <bullet> Discussion with the Director of the National Science 
Foundation
    <bullet> Diversity Initiatives of the Chemistry Division of the 
National Science Foundation
    <bullet> Report on NSF Funding to Minority Serving Institutions
    <bullet> Ad Hoc Subcommittee Reports on Communications, 
Preparation of the CEOSE Biennial Report to Congress, Institutional 
Transformation, and Widening Creative Pathways
    Public Comment Session (Sign up required).

Friday, February 2, 2007

    Opening Statement by the New CEOSE Chair.
    Presentations/Discussions:
    <bullet> Reports of CEOSE Liaisons to National Science 
Foundation Advisory Committees
    <bullet> Briefing on AAAS Session, Lessons Learned: Broadening 
Federal Participation Efforts'', Scheduled for February 17, 2007
    <bullet> Deliberations on Key Areas of Focus in the Future, 
Recommendations, and Action Items
    Completion of Unfinished Business.

    Dated: January 9, 2007.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Managment Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-112 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (First Place) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of First Place, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Place.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            
|------------
|May 14, 2003
|            



19
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William C. Tao, the Chief Executive Officer of Royal Mines
And Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ William C. Tao                   
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | WILLIAM C. TAO                       
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | August 12, 2008                      
| |        |                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
SERVED: JULY 17,2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BEACH AVIATION, LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1325 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S0950071) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J .E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Charles Brady 

Beach Aviation, LLC, Respondent 

3700 Airport Road, Suite 405 

Boca Raton, FL 33431 

TEL: 954-600-0260 

ONE COPY 

Brandon C. Goldberg, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FPC{: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FPC{: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1325 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
§ 604.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
§ 618.115 Assurance required. ( a ) *General.* Either at the application stage or the award stage, Federal agencies must ensure that applications for Federal financial assistance or awards of Federal financial assistance contain, be accompanied by, or be covered by a specifically identified assurance from the applicant or recipient, satisfactory to the designated agency official, that each education program or activity operated by the applicant or recipient and to which these Title IX regulations apply will be operated in compliance with these Title IX regulations. An assurance of compliance with these Title IX regulations shall not be satisfactory to the designated agency official if the applicant or recipient to whom such assurance applies fails to commit itself to take whatever remedial action is necessary in accordance with § 618.110(a) to eliminate existing discrimination on the basis of sex or to eliminate the effects of past discrimination whether occurring prior to or subsequent to the submission to the designated agency official of such assurance.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide real property or structures thereon, such assurance shall obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used to provide an education program or activity.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) The assurances required by paragraph (a) of this section, which may be included as part of a document that addresses other assurances or obligations, shall include that the applicant or recipient will comply with all applicable Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, 1685-1688).
( 2 ) The designated agency official will specify the extent to which such assurances will be required of the applicant's or recipient's subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, or successors in interest.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
             RASC SERIES 2006-EMX7 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of August  1, 2006 (as  amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among  Residential  Asset  Securities  Corporation,  as  depositor,  Residential
Funding  Company,  LLC (formerly  Residential  Funding  Corporation),  as master
servicer,  and U.S. Bank National  Association,  as trustee, does hereby certify
that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 136878 & (23) Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. JONATHAN MOORE, JR., Stephen J. Markman, Petitioner-Appellant, J ustices

v SC: 136878 COA: 283169 Chippewa CC: 07-009563-AH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be re viewed by this Court. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.

p1020 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2008

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7260
MALIK AMBE NERO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOYCE K. CONLEY, Doctor, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1224-5) Submitted: November 12, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malik Ambe Nero, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Malik Ambe Nero, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nero v. Conley , No. CA-00-1224 -5 (S.D.W. Va. June 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 681.7 What is contained in a complaint? ( a ) A complaint is a written statement giving notice to the person alleged to be liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802 of the specific allegations being referred for adjudication and of the person's right to request a hearing with respect to those allegations.
( b ) The complaint will state that NSF seeks to impose civil penalties, assessments, or both, against the defendant and will include: ( 1 ) The allegations of liability against the defendant, including the statutory basis for liability, identification of the claims or statements involved, and the reasons liability allegedly arises from such claims or statements;
( 2 ) The maximum amount of penalties and assessments for which the defendant may be held liable;
( 3 ) A statement that the defendant may request a hearing by filing an answer and may be represented by a representative;
( 4 ) Instructions for filing such an answer; and
( 5 ) A warning that failure to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint will result in imposition of the maximum amount of penalties and assessments.
( c ) The reviewing official must serve any complaint on the defendant and, if a hearing is requested by the defendant, provide a copy to the ALJ assigned to the case.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Yanglin Soybean, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shulin Liu, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 4, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                SHULIN LIUShulin
                LiuChief
                Executive Officer
EX-35 (b)
(logo) AVELO
 MORTGAGE


Avelo Mortgage,


Annual Compliance Statement


Re: GSAMP Trust 2006-HE5 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2006-HE5, issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of August 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage
Securities Corp., as Depositor, Litton Loan Servicing LP, as a Servicer, Select
Portfolio Servicing, Inc., as a Servicer, Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as a Servicer,
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as a Custodian, U.S. Bank
National Association, as a Custodian, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as a
Custodian, LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Securities Administrator and Master Servicer, GSAMP Trust 2006-HE5.

1.  A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from February 24, 2006 through December 31, 2006. This review was completed
under my supervision.

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:


For a period of time in 2006, bank accounts were not reconciled in strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:


     *  Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed
        securities, related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and
        related bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are
        (A) mathematically accurate; (B) prepared within 30 calendar days after
        the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified
        in the transaction agreements; (C) reviewed and approved by someone
        other than the person who prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain
        explanations for reconciling items. These reconciling items are resolved
        within 90 calendar days of their original identification, or such other
        number of days specified in the transaction agreements.


The bank account reconciliations were current as of December 31, 2006, and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.


I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ James Weston Moffett
Name:James Weston Moffett
Title: President and CEO
Date: February 28, 2007


600 E. Las Colinas Blvd. Suite 620 Irving, TX 75039 972.910.7000 F. 972.910.7099
From: "Jane Leiderman" <Jane20@pacball.net> 

To: <tobrien@fec.gov>, 

Date: 06^2/2016 06:30 PM 

Subject RE: extension request 

Hello Terry, 

I have filed 5 amendments reflecting Incoming/outgoing amounts for Credit Card contributions/transfers 

for Lieu Victory Fund. 

Also, I believe the unknown difference specified In your report comes from "processing fees" that are 

reflected In December bank statements but weren't reported on the PEC report until 1 quarter of 2015. 

The reason for delay In reporting of these charges was due to maternity leave I was on since November 

•of 2014. 

I hope this clears most of the Items from the audit report. 

Please let me know If you have any questions. 

Thank you, 

Jane