alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2509.18 What procedures apply to guidance documents identified as “significant”? ( a ) OGC review of proposed guidance documents will include a preliminary determination as to whether the proposed guidance document is significant within the meaning of § 2509.20. Unless exempt, each proposed guidance document determined to be significant must be approved by the Chief Executive Officer before issuance. In such instances, CNCS will: ( 1 ) Obtain a RIN to report what CNCS is planning to issue;
( 2 ) Coordinate the guidance document with the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for the interagency review, final significance determination, and clearance; and
( 3 ) Coordinate internal review and clearance of the guidance document before submitting it to the Chief Executive Officer for approval, consistent with CNCS Policy 103.
( b ) If the guidance document is determined to be significant under § 2509.20, CNCS may proceed with publication in the Federal Register. For each significant guidance document, the originating CNCS office should include a statement in the clearance memorandum indicating that the guidance document has been reviewed and cleared in accordance with this section.
## 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

## )

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)

Technical Analyses and Information Supporting the Designation Recommendation for Oklahoma



## LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

 Cover Letter (from Director)

– September 18 , 2015

 Introduction and Summary

 Correspondence

 Governor's letter

-- May 27, 2011, Designation Recommendation

 Governor's letter

– August 17, 2015. Affirmation of Designation Recommendation for 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS for N oble, Choctaw, and Muskogee Counties in Oklahoma

 EPA letter to Scott Thompson

– March 20, 2015

 Modeling Report

-- Modeling Compliance with the 1

- Hour SO2 NAAQS

 Technical Evaluation

 Modeling Analysis Report

-- Source

- Oriented SO2 Monitoring Placement for the Area of Muskogee, Oklahoma

 Comparison of Modeled and Monitored SO2 Concentrations i n Muskogee, Oklahoma

 Effects of Terrain on Wind Speeds

 OG&E’s Public Statements on the Conversion of Muskogee Units 4 & 5 to Natural

Gas

 List of Modeling Files Included in Zip File "Modeling.7z" on DVD
§ 2520.35 Must my program recruit or support volunteers? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46033 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66614 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) Unless the Corporation or the State commission, as appropriate, approves otherwise, some component of your program that is supported through the grant awarded by the Corporation must involve recruiting or supporting volunteers.
( b ) If you demonstrate that requiring your program to recruit or support volunteers would constitute a fundamental alteration to your program structure, the Corporation (or the State commission for formula programs) may waive the requirement in response to your written request for such a waiver in the grant application.
[70 FR 39597, July 8, 2005]
§ 32.9 Financial hardship. ( a ) A debtor whose wages are subject to a withholding order may, at any time, request a review by the Department of the amount garnished, based on materially changed circumstances such as disability, divorce, or catastrophic illness which result in financial hardship.
( b ) A debtor requesting such a review under paragraph (a) of this section shall submit the basis for claiming that the current amount of garnishment results in a financial hardship to the debtor, along with supporting documentation. The Secretary shall consider any information submitted in accordance with this part.
( c ) If a financial hardship is found, the Secretary shall downwardly adjust, by an amount and for a period of time established by the Secretary, the amount garnished to reflect the debtor's financial condition. The Secretary will notify the employer of any adjustments to the amount to be withheld.
# EUR-Lex - 12008E142 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E142

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VIII: ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Chapter 5: Transitional provisions - Article 142 (ex Article 124(1) TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0110 - 0110 *

Article 142

(ex Article 124(1) TEC)

Each Member State with a derogation shall treat its exchange-rate policy as a matter of common interest. In so doing, Member States shall take account of the experience acquired in cooperation within the framework of the exchange-rate mechanism.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FBR Capital Markets Corporation (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                                          
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|March 16, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Bradley J. Wright                    
|               |  |  |  | BRADLEY J. WRIGHT Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10(s)(s)(s)




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
HP INC.
2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The HP Inc. 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective as of February 28, 2020:
		
	1.
	Section 3.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


“3.4    Outside Director Deferral Elections.  In order to elect to defer a portion of his Annual Retainer earned during a Plan Year, an Outside Director shall submit an irrevocable Deferral Form with HP before the beginning of such Plan Year, but no earlier than the first day of November preceding the Plan Year within which the deferral is to be made.  The portion of his Annual Retainer that an Outside Director elects to defer for a Plan Year shall be stated as a whole dollar amount, up to a maximum of 100% of his Annual Retainer.  Any failure to make an election shall be deemed to be an election for the same deferral amount and the same distribution date and form of payment for the following Plan Year as were in effect for such Outside Director for the current Plan Year.  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any individual who first becomes an Outside Director after the start of a Plan Year and has not otherwise been eligible to participate in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan maintained by the Company, may elect within 30 days of becoming an Outside Director to defer up to 100% of his Annual Retainer that is earned with respect to service as an Outside Director subsequent to the date the deferral election becomes effective. Such election shall be irrevocable and effective no later than the end of such 30-day period.
In all other respects the Plan, as amended herein, is hereby ratified and confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HP Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of this 28th day of February, 2020.
	
				
	 
	HP INC.
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/  Tracy Keogh

	 
	Its:
	Chief Human Resources Officer
### Gormas. Michael (OST)



## '0 Follow up Completed Martin, Michael (OST) Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:39 PM citymanager@cityofkake.org; PAUL.KHERA@ALASKA.GOV; michael.lu kshin@alaska.gov; Rich.5ewell@alaska.gov Gormas, Michael (OST);hank@hankm.com Essential Air Service at Kakeand Excursion Inlet Harris Air Proposal to Provide EASat Kake,AK - 2014.pdf; Alaska Seaplanes Proposal to Provide EASat Kakeand Excursion Inlet - 2014.docx; Kake_EAS_Proposal_04282014 

## "~ _FlNAL.pdf 

### = .,,:::" 

### ...., ..

",\'"-;: 

# to:~~~j ~}:

~~~~ 

# f~8~ Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Hello everyone, 

### Follow UpFlag: FlagStatus: From: Sent: To:



### o (.t) Iwould like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS)situation at Kakeand Excursion Inlet, AK,as' well asgive you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued O'rder 2014-3-15 (March 28, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EA5for a new term. In response to our request, three air carriers submitted proposals: Alaska Seaplanes, Harris Aircraft Services, and SeaPort Airlines. I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and Iexpect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have assoon as possible,
. but no later than Thursday, May 29. Pleasesend your comments directly via e-mail to michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov. Regards,

. Michael Martin United States Department of Transportation Essential Air Service (EAS)and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) (202) 366-6494

1
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Jason
Walsh, state and attest that:




(1)  
I am the Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of Scout Exploration, Inc.
(the “Company”).




(2)  
Accompanying this certification is the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, (the “Report”) as
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements.




(3)  
I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that




▪
            the
      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
      and




▪
            the
      information specified in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the period presented.




/s/
Jason
Walsh


Jason
Walsh


Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer


May 8,
2009






A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scout Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Scout Exploration,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee J--Population and Patient-Oriented Training.
    Date: February 19-20, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Westin Arlington Gateway, 801 North Glebe Road, 
Arlington, VA 22203.
    Contact Person: Ilda M McKenna, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Research Training Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d000e060803030c042d000c040143030405430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79a949c929999969eb79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: December 21, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9952 Filed 12-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 70788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-06-061]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: December 14, 2006 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered

    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. AA1921-197, 701-TA-319, 320, 325-327, 348, and 350); 
and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-587, 612, and 614-618 (Second 
Review) (Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, 
Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, 
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom)--briefing and 
vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before January 17, 2007.).
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 4, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9580 Filed 12-4-06; 11:43 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the annual report of BlueFire Ethanol Fuels, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an
exhibit (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of BlueFire Ethanol Fuels, Inc.
does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  March 26, 2009
              
              /s/
      Arnold KlannArnold
      KlannCHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER
§ 261.60 What hours of participation may a State report for a work-eligible individual? ( a ) A State must report the actual hours that an individual participates in an activity, subject to the qualifications in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section and § 261.61(c). It is not sufficient to report the hours an individual is scheduled to participate in an activity.
( b ) For the purposes of calculating the work participation rates for a month, actual hours may include the hours for which an individual was paid, including paid holidays and sick leave. For participation in unpaid work activities, it may include excused absences for hours missed due to a maximum of 10 holidays in the preceding 12-month period and up to 80 hours of additional excused absences in the preceding 12-month period, no more than 16 of which may occur in a month, for each work-eligible individual. Each State must designate the days that it wishes to count as holidays for those in unpaid activities in its Work Verification Plan. It may designate no more than 10 such days. In order to count an excused absence as actual hours of participation, the individual must have been scheduled to participate in a countable work activity for the period of the absence that the State reports as participation. A State must describe its excused absence policies and definitions as part of its Work Verification Plan, specified at § 261.62.
( c ) For unsubsidized employment, subsidized employment, and OJT, a State may report projected actual hours of employment participation for up to six months based on current, documented actual hours of work. Any time a State receives information that the client's actual hours of work have changed, or no later than the end of any six-month period, the State must re-verify the client's current actual average hours of work, and may report these projected actual hours of participation for another six-month period.
( d ) A State may not count more hours toward the participation rate for a self-employed individual than the number derived by dividing the individual's self-employment income (gross income less business expenses) by the Federal minimum wage. A State may propose an alternative method of determining self-employment hours as part of its Work Verification Plan.
( e ) A State may count supervised homework time and up to one hour of unsupervised homework time for each hour of class time. Total homework time counted for participation cannot exceed the hours required or advised by a particular educational program.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009�1231

Integrated Multibeam and LIDAR Bathymetry Data Offshore of New London and Niantic, Connecticut

----

## Abstract 

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		                                    URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1231/html/abstract.html		Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact		Page Last Modified: Monday, 12-Jul-2010 02:20:35 EDT
#### Burton *et al. v.*O’Neill Manufacturing Company.

Argued November 5,

Decided November 16, 1906.

Atkinson, J.

1. Fairly construed, the contract involved in this case was entire, and for the sale of .land at a stipulated price in money and upon the condition that the timber thereon be sawed into lumber and delivered by the vendee to the vendor at a stipulated price.

:2. ¡Such contract being in writing and unambiguous, it was not competent by parol evidence to vary the terms thereof by showing that the provisions of the contract for the manufacture and sale of lumber were only as security for the payment of the money specified to be paid for the land.

*:3.*In an equitable petition praying for an injunction, it is not essential to the grant of the injunction upon the ground of irreparable damage that there should be in terms an allegation that the damage would be irreparable, if the averments of the petition, taken as a whole, are such as to demonstrate that such would be the result of the conduct complained of in the petition. *Huxford*v. *Southern Pine Co.,*124 *Ga.*181.

■4. The contract shows in the vendor such interest in the timber as would support an action for a misappropriation thereof. There being sufficient pleadings and evidence to authorize the trial judge to hold that the timber was" being disposed of by the vendee contrary to the provisions of the contract, and to the irreparable injury of the plaintiff, it was not ■ erroneous for him to interfere by injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*806Injunction. Before Judge .Wright. Floyd superior court. September 7, 1906.

*Mi B. BubanJcs,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Denny & Harris*and *Dean & Dean,*contra.