alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EPA**

**– HQ** 

**– OAR** 

**– 2003** 

**– 0167**  **- 0032**  **Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Am**  **endments to the Section 608 Leak Repair Requirements**  Th e proposed modifications to 40 C.F.R. § 82 would further the purpose of minimizing the use of class I and class II substances as stated i n § 608 of the Clean Air Act. As the design and new construction industry move towards more sustainable refrigerant technologies, the HVAC and industrial maintenance industries must keep pace. An y move towards the standardizing of maintenance procedures and the decommissioning of cooling s ys tems that leak substantial levels of refrigerant is a step in the proper direction. The benefits of these proposed changes are worthwhile. The benefits of minimizing the use of ozone depleting substances (“ODS”) are obvious. However, one of the major corollary benefits as a result from the decommissioning of repeatedl y - leaking sy stems is the replacement of those sy stems with more efficient s ys tems, decreasing industrial and commercial energy usage for HVAC and industrial processes. Specificall y, there are three of the proposed changes that I strongly support. First, the retrofit time reduction is a much
- needed change that will prevent the worst
- leaking s ys tems from continuously

exceeding leak rate limits, while stil l providing a more economical option to the operator than requiring the decommissioning and replacement of a s ys tem. Moving from a one
ye ar time period to a six
- month time period for replacement will substantially affect the ODP
weighted tonnes being rele ased into the atmosphere. Second, the movement towards a leak rate formula that accounts for periods of longer than a y ear between recharges is much more useful than a single
- ye ar calculation. As refrigeration and cooling technology improves, the useful life of sy stems increase. With those increases come reduced levels of ODS leakage. Having a formula that accounts for those reduced levels of leakage over periods extending more than one ye ar will improve documentation of leak rates and subsequently , the regulation of sy stems leaking unacceptable levels of ODS. Finall y, the worst
- leaker provision is much more helpful in regulating ODS releases. This provision as revised would target the highest polluting sy stems for regulation. The second option the Environmental Protection Agency is considering would provide for more flexibility for the s ys tem operators, while also providing higher levels of regulation for s ys tems that repeatedl y leak ODS. Reid Jennings 2803 E. 37 th Ave Spokane, WA 99223 P: 913.548.76 30 rjennings@lawschool.gonzaga.edu
JAMES L OBERSTAR 

Or» DI9TMCT, MINNESOTA 

2365 RAYBURN HOUSE OFHCE BUILDINC 

WASHINGTON, OC 2051&-2308 

(202)225-6211 

FAX: (202) 225-0699 

www.housa.gov/oberstar 

CHAIRMAN: 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION 

AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

AT-LARGE WHIP 

ConsreBB of the lanited States 

lioust of lUpitBentatiots 

IDashington, ©£20515-230$ 

September 30,2010 

BRAINERD Crry HALL 

501 LAUREL STREET 

BRAINERD, M N 56401 

(218)82&-4400 

CHISHOLM Cny HALL 

316 LAKE STREET 

CHISHOLM, MN 56719 

(218)264-5761 

231 FEDERAL BUILDINO 

DULUTH, MN 55802 

(218)727-7474 

38625 14TH AVENUE 

SUITE 300B 

NORTH BRANCH, MN 55056 

(651)277-1234 The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secc^^J^Hood: 

I am writing in support of an application by the St. Cloud Regional Aiqjort for a grant under 

the Small Community Air Service Development Program. 

The grant would be used to support direct air service from St. Cloud to Chicago. 

Since 2009, when Mesaba Airlines discontinued its air service at St. Cloud airport, the 

underserved region has had limited charter service from Sun Country Airlines. Lack of direct 

service to another hub outside of Minnesota has resulted in air travelers from the St. Cloud area to 

drive to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International airport to fulfill their air travel needs. The creation 

of new air service routes to Chicago, with a possibility to expand elsewhere around the country in 

the future, would greatly impact the St. Cloud region and better serve the needs of St. Cloud area 

residents. 

I urge the full and fair consideration of St. Cloud Regional Airport's grant application 

consistent with applicable law, rules and regulations. 

With best wishes. 

Sincerely, 

L. Oberstar, M.C. 

JLO/inb 

PRINTCO ON RECYCLED PAPEK
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

UNITED FIRE LLOYDS,

 Appellant,

v.

JD KUNZ CONCRETE CONTRACTOR, 

INC., and EXPLOREUSA RV, LTD., 

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-23-00047-CV

Appeal from the 

207th Judicial District Court 

 of Comal County, Texas 

 (TC# C2021-0734B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellants all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Good Morning, Kendrick! 

It's a great morning! I 

I just want to thank you, Brenda and the rest of your team for all your help in getting us through 

this process. :) 

I have learned much and words can't express how grateftil and appreciative I am 

for your kindness, endless patience and help in getting these amendments to balance. 

You have a great team and should be very proud of their hard work! Please tell them "Thank 

You" from me!! 

Please consider this niy response declining the audit^heanngi; 

Have a great day! I know I will! 

Thanks again.. 

Dee Stanley-NDGOP 

Business Manager 

North Dakota Republican Party 

(701)255-0030 

(701)255-7513-fax
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Charles Joyce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mobile Reach
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

                                            /s/  Charles Joyce
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Charles Joyce
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 March 15, 2004
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

September 20, 2024

CR-2022-1276

James Calvin Crummie, Jr. v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit 

Court: CC-20-1181) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on September 20, 2024, the following action was 

taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
§ 264.40 What happens if a State does not repay a Federal loan? ( a ) If a State fails to repay the amount of principal and interest due at any point under a loan agreement developed pursuant to section 406 of the Act: ( 1 ) The entire outstanding loan balance, plus all accumulated interest, becomes due and payable immediately; and
( 2 ) We will reduce the SFAG payable for the immediately succeeding fiscal year quarter by the outstanding loan amount plus interest.
( b ) Neither the reasonable cause provisions at § 262.5 of this chapter nor the corrective compliance plan provisions at § 262.6 of this chapter apply when a State fails to repay a Federal loan.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 956 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 956

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve dependent coverage 
                 under the TRICARE Young Adult Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2023

  Mr. Kelly (for himself, Mr. Tester, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Warren) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve dependent coverage 
                 under the TRICARE Young Adult Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care Fairness for Military 
Families Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO DEPENDENT COVERAGE UNDER TRICARE YOUNG ADULT 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Expansion of Eligibility.--Subsection (b) of section 1110b of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
        (3) and (4), respectively.
    (b) Elimination of Separate Premium for a Young Adult.--Such 
section is further amended by striking subsection (c).
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1075(c)(3) of such title is 
amended by striking ``section 1076d, 1076e, or 1110b'' and inserting 
``section 1076d or 1076e''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1  LAKE & ASSOCIATES CPAs, LLC  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the use, in the report on Form 10-K of Sadhana Equity Investment, Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated September 24, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements of Sadhana Equity Investment, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the related statements of operations, shareholders deficit and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and from inception on July 5, 2006 through December 31, 2008, and the reference to us under the caption Experts.  /s/ Lake & Associates, CPAs LLC  Lake & Associates, CPAs LLC Shaumburg, Illinois October 5, 2009
#### Clark W. Linzey, as Administrator of the Estate of Nile Linzey, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*American Ice Company, Appellant.

*Linzey*v. *American Ice Oo.,*131 App. Div. 333, affirmed.

(Argued January 25, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 15, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.

*A. T. Clearwater*for appellant.

*Frank H. Osborn*and *William W. Bennett*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
#### Paxton, Receiver, et al. v. Columbia Trust Company.

(Decided October 4, 1918.)

Appeal from Anderson Circuit Court.

1. Appeal and Error—Docketing by Clerk—Filing of Statement.— Under section 740 of tbe Civil Code of Practice the clerk of the Court of Appeals has no authority to docket an appeal until the appellant files the' statement of appeal required by section 739 of the Code.

2. Appeal and Error—Failure to File Statement—Striking from *Docket.—A*motion to dismiss an appeal for appellant’s failure to •file the statement of appeal required by section 739 of the Civil Code, will be treated, as a motion, to strike the appeal from the docket and sustained.

F. R. FELAND, LILLARD CARTER and BENJAMIN H. SACHS for appellant.

KEITH L. BULLITT for appellee'.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Striking appeal from the docket.

This seems to be an appeal by the receiver of the Hoffman Distilling Company, and his attorney, from a judgment entered in the case of the Columbia Trust Co. v. Hoffman Distilling Company and its creditors, denying a fee for the receiver’s attorney. The record contains none of the pleadings; and, the judgment, which covers- many questions, states, in closing, that all parties prayed and were granted an appeal to this court. There being no statement of appeal, as is required by section 739 of the Civil Code, it is impossible for this court to say who is complaining, or what judgment is attacked. Tarvin v. Tarvin, 20 Ky. L. R. 730, 47 S. W. 434; Brodie v. Parsons, 23 Ky. L. R. 831, 64 S. W. 426. But, upon.the calling of the case upon the docket, Graumes & Ulrich, styling themselves appellees, moved the court to dismiss the appeal for failure to file the re*516quired statement of appeal, and the case is now submitted upon that motion.

The necessity of a statement of appeal is well illustrated by this record, since, as it now stands, without a statement, we are at a loss to know who are the parties to the appeal, or who will be bound by the judgment. But the penalty for failing’ to file the statement of appeal is not a dismissal of the appeal, but a denial of the right to have it placed upon the docket. It is expressly so provided by section 740 of the Civil Code. See also Buchanan v. Boyd’s Exr., 131 Ky. 437. The act of the clerk in inadvertently docketing the appeal did not supply the statement, or render it unnecessary.

The motion to dismiss the appeal will be treated as a motion to strike the appeal from the docket and sustained. It is so ordered.
§ 31.5 Notice. ( a ) *Requirements.* If not previously included in the initial demand letter provided under section 30.11, at least 60 days before referring a debt for tax refund offset, the Secretary shall mail, by first class mail to the debtor's last known address, written notice informing the debtor of: ( 1 ) The nature and amount of the debt;
( 2 ) The determination that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable, and unless paid within 60 days after the date of the notice, the Secretary intends to enforce collection by referring the debt the Department of the Treasury for tax refund offset; and
( 3 ) The debtor's rights to: ( i ) Inspect and copy Department records relating to the debt;
( ii ) Enter into written agreement to repay the amount of the debt;
( iii ) Request review and present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable.
( b ) The Secretary will retain evidence of service indicating the date of mailing of the notice. The notice may be retained electronically so long as the manner of retention is sufficient for evidentiary purposes
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10


[LOGO AMERICAN PSYCH SYSTEMS]


May 15, 2000


Mr. Stephen A. DaRe
Executive Vice President and CFO
American Psych Systems, Inc.
6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 200
Bethesda, MD 20817

Re:   Severance Package

Dear Steve:

Per our agreement, in the event that your employment with American Psych
Systems, Inc. is terminated for any reason other than the commission of an act
of gross misconduct by you, APS' shall pay you severance equal to one year of
your base salary which shall be payable pursuant to APS' regular payroll
schedule. APS shall continue to provide you with medical insurance and dental
insurance until the end of the year of your severance benefit.

For purposes hereof, the term "gross misconduct" shall mean your being convicted
of a felony or the suspension or termination of your license to practice
accounting in the state of Maryland.

Sincerely,


/s/ Kenneth Kessler

Kenneth A. Kessler, M.D.
President and CEO
#### § 2522.530 May I use the Corporation's program grant funds for performance measurement and evaluation?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034, May 28, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615, Aug. 16, 2024.

If performance measurement and evaluation costs were approved as part of your grant, you may use your program grant funds to support them, consistent with the level of approved costs for such activities in your grant award.

[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TCP Capital Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Howard M. Levkowitz, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Davis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: February 28, 2017      |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                |   |
| /s/ Howard M. Levkowitz       |   |
| Howard M. Levkowitz           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer       |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                |   |
| Dated: February 28, 2017      |   |
|                |   |
| /s/ Paul L. Davis             |   |
| Paul L. Davis                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TCP Capital Corp. and will be retained by TCP Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- Roll 162063
- Roll 162064
- Roll 162065
- Roll 162066
- Roll 162067
- Roll 162068
- Roll 162069
- Roll 162070
- Roll 162071
- Roll 162072
- Roll 162073
- Roll 162074
ACCEPTED

03-14-00617-CR

7707617

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/5/2015 3:57:16 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/5/2015 3:57:16 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.504 How must an IRB be registered?

Each IRB must be registered electronically through *http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/efile* unless an institution or organization lacks the ability to register its IRB(s) electronically. If an institution or organization lacks the ability to register an IRB electronically, it must send its IRB registration information in writing to OHRP.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-325 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GEORGIA 

Signed at Tbilisi November 10, 2002 

 with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GEORGIA 

 Defense: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Tbilisi November 10, 2002; 

 Entered into force March 25, 2003. 

 With annex.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

**C O U R T O F A P P E A L S**

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED

August 22, 2019

v No. 346451

Oakland Circuit Court

ROBERT EROLL WRIGHT, LC No. 2018

- 167560

- AR

Defendant

- Appellee.

Before: S HAPIRO

, P .J., and G LEICHER and S WARTZLE , JJ.

S HAPIRO

, P.J. ( concur ring ).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro