alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc.
Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-HE2

Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest
Distributions to Certificateholders for 2006

Class      Interest            Principal            Realized           Ending
          Distribution            Paid               Losses            Balance

A1        5,204,262.10       47,560,835.14            0.00      260,697,164.86
A2A       2,535,059.75       37,418,752.43            0.00      119,832,247.57
A2B         499,275.82                0.00            0.00       28,079,000.00
A2C         875,626.28                0.00            0.00       48,795,000.00
A2D         357,850.56                0.00            0.00       19,619,000.00
CE        5,721,750.36                0.00            0.08       16,108,314.11
M1          487,500.62                0.00            0.00       26,489,000.00
M10         214,855.54                0.00            0.00        8,949,000.00
M2          455,367.24                0.00            0.00       24,699,000.00
M3          278,162.40                0.00            0.00       15,034,000.00
M4          234,278.38                0.00            0.00       12,529,000.00
M5          235,510.40                0.00            0.00       12,529,000.00
M6          217,199.53                0.00            0.00       11,455,000.00
M7          195,614.23                0.00            0.00        9,665,000.00
M8          150,760.58                0.00            0.00        7,159,000.00
M9          220,400.11                0.00            0.00        9,307,000.00
P         1,108,414.90                0.00            0.00              100.00
R                 0.00                0.00            0.00                0.00
RX                0.00                0.00            0.00                0.00
From: Neil P. Reiff 

To: DKDilishafec.oiw 

Subject: Utah DemoaaUc Party Audit 

Date: 11/23/2015 02:50 PM 

Doug, we are in receipt of the DFAR for the Utah Democratic Party. I would like to make a couple of 

comments: 

1) With respect to the misreporting issue, we continue to believe that the proper way to 

disclose the activity is the way we described it on our last response. We have nothing more 

to add at this time. 

2) With respect to the Levin reporting, please note that the committee conducted a Last in 

First Out accounting procedure (LiFO) to properly identify donors who could be reported as 

Levin contributors. Let us know if you need additional details regarding our analysis. 

3) We are not requesting a hearing on any issues raised in the DFAR. 

Let me know if you need any additional information. 

Neil P. Reiff 

Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein & Birkenstock, P.C. 

1025 Vermont Ave, NW 

Suite 300 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

w. (202)479 - 1111 

f. (202)479 - 1115 

This message Is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may 

contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this 

message is not the intended recipient or any employee or agent responsible for delivering the 

message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or 

copying of this communication is strictly prohibited, if you have received this communication in 

error, please notify us immediately by email. Thank you for your cooperation. 

iRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the iRS, we inform 

you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is 

not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties 

under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any 

transaction or matter addressed herein.
§ 410.2002 UC Office of the Ombuds scope and responsibilities. ( a ) The UC Office of the Ombuds may engage in activities consistent with § 410.2001, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Receiving reports from unaccompanied children, potential sponsors, other stakeholders in a child's case, and the public regarding ORR's adherence to its own regulations and standards.
( 2 ) Investigating implementation of or adherence to Federal law and ORR regulations, in response to reports it receives, and meeting with interested parties to receive input on ORR's compliance with Federal law and ORR policy;
( 3 ) Requesting and receiving information or documents, such as the Ombuds deems relevant, from ORR and ORR care provider facilities, to determine implementation of and adherence to Federal law and ORR policy;
( 4 ) Preparing formal reports and recommendations on findings to publish, including an annual report describing activities conducted in the prior year;
( 5 ) Conducting investigations, interviews, and site visits at care provider facilities as necessary to aid in the preparation of reports and recommendations;
( 6 ) Visiting ORR care providers in which unaccompanied children are or will be housed;
( 7 ) Reviewing individual circumstances, including but not limited to concerns about unaccompanied children's access to services, ability to communicate with service providers, parents or legal guardians of children in ORR custody, sponsors, and matters related to transfers within or discharge from ORR care;
( 8 ) Making efforts to resolve complaints or concerns raised by interested parties as it relates to ORR's implementation or adherence to Federal law or ORR policy;
( 9 ) Hiring and retaining others, including but not limited to independent experts, specialists, assistants, interpreters, and translators to assist the Ombuds in the performance of their duties;
( 10 ) Making non-binding recommendations to ORR regarding its policies and procedures, specific to protecting unaccompanied children in the care of ORR;
( 11 ) Providing general educational information about pertinent laws, regulations and policies, ORR child advocates, and legal services as appropriate; and
( 12 ) Advising and updating the Director of ORR, Assistant Secretary, and the Secretary, as appropriate, on the status of ORR's implementation and adherence to Federal law or ORR policy.
( b ) The UC Office of the Ombuds may in its discretion refer matters to other Federal agencies or offices with jurisdiction over a particular matter, for further investigation where appropriate, including to Federal or State law enforcement.
( c ) To accomplish its work, the UC Office of the Ombuds may, as needed, have timely and direct access to: ( 1 ) Unaccompanied children in ORR care;
( 2 ) ORR care provider facilities;
( 3 ) Case file information;
( 4 ) Care provider and Federal staff responsible for children's care; and
( 5 ) Statistical and other data that ORR maintains.
Exhibit 33.2


           ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.(collectively,
the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the
servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to any
transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii), (iv),
(4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

o The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.


                                       1
<PAGE>

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of
compliance.


      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
        Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      --------------------------              --------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer

March 1, 2007


                                       2
#### Francis J. Lantry, as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York, Appellant, *v.*Albert Mede, Respondent.

*Lantry*v. *Mede,*137 App. Div. 557, affirmed.

(Argued January 5, 1909;

decided January 19, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 8, Í908, which reversed an order of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment in favor of defendant and granting a new trial, and directed a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover a penalty under section 670 of the charter of the city of New York (L. 1901, ch. 466) for failure to obey an order of the plaintiff as fire commissioner.

*Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connolly, Herman Stiefel*and *William J. Millard*of counsel) for appellant.

*Ira J. Ettinger*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Ingraham, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
§ 2554.37 Are there sanctions for misconduct? ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person, including any party or representative for— ( 1 ) Failing to comply with an order, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Any such sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) When a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the ALJ may— ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem each matter of which an admission is requested to be admitted;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with such order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon testimony relating to the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with such request.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part commenced by service of a notice of hearing, the ALJ may dismiss the action or may issue an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The ALJ may refuse to consider any motion, request, response, brief or other document which is not filed in a timely fashion.
§ 2552.72 Is a written volunteer assignment plan required for each Foster Grandparent? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) All Foster Grandparents shall receive a written volunteer assignment plan developed by the volunteer station that: ( 1 ) Is approved by the sponsor and accepted by the Foster Grandparent;
( 2 ) Identifies the individual child(ren) to be served;
( 3 ) Identifies the role and activities of the Foster Grandparent and expected outcomes for the child;
( 4 ) Addresses the period of time each child should receive such services; and
( 5 ) Is used to review the impact of the assignment on the child(ren).
( b ) [Reserved]
[64 FR 14126, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64652, Dec. 17, 2018]
§ 672.8 Answer to the complaint. ( a ) *General.* Where respondent ( 1 ) contests any material fact upon which the complaint is based;
( 2 ) contends that the amount of the penalty proposed in the complaint or the proposed revocation or suspension, as the case may be, is inappropriate; or
( 3 ) contends that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, he shall file a written answer to the complaint with the Hearing Clerk. Any such answer to the complaint must be filed with the Hearing Clerk within twenty (20) days after service of the complaint.
( b ) *Contents of the answer.* The answer shall clearly and directly admit, deny or explain each of the factual allegations contained in the complaint. If respondent asserts he has no knowledge of a particular factual allegation, the allegation is deemed denied. The answer shall also state ( 1 ) the circumstances or arguments which are alleged to constitute the grounds of defense;
( 2 ) the facts which respondent intends to place at issue; and
( 3 ) whether a hearing is requested.
( c ) *Request for hearing.* A hearing upon the issues raised by the complaint and answer shall be held upon request of respondent in the answer. The Presiding Officer may deem the right to a hearing waived if it is not requested by respondent. In addition, a hearing may be held at the discretion of the Presiding Officer, sua sponte, to examine issues raised in the answer.
( d ) *Failure to admit, deny, or explain.* Failure of respondent to admit, deny, or explain any material factual allegation contained in the complaint constitutes an admission of the allegation.
( e ) *Amendment of the answer.* The respondent may amend the answer to the complaint upon motion granted by the Presiding Officer.
# Gazzetta ufficiale L 73/2011

| | ISSN 1725-258X
  doi:10.3000/1725258X.L_2011.073.ita |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | L 73 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Legislazione | 54o anno18 marzo 2011 |

ISSN 1725-258X

doi:10.3000/1725258X.L_2011.073.ita

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

L 73

Edizione in lingua italiana

Legislazione

54o anno18 marzo 2011

---

| Sommario | | II   Atti non legislativi | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACCORDI INTERNAZIONALI |
| | * | Informazione riguardante la data di entrata in vigore dell’accordo di partenariato nel settore della pesca tra l’Unione europea e le Isole Salomone | 1 |

Sommario

II   Atti non legislativi

pagina

ACCORDI INTERNAZIONALI

*

Informazione riguardante la data di entrata in vigore dell’accordo di partenariato nel settore della pesca tra l’Unione europea e le Isole Salomone

1

| IT | Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.
  I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco. |
| --- | --- |

IT

Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.

I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco.

---

II Atti non legislativi

ACCORDI INTERNAZIONALI

| 18.3.2011 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | L 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

L 73/1

---

Informazione riguardante la data di entrata in vigore dell’accordo di partenariato nel settore della pesca tra l’Unione europea e le Isole Salomone

Il 7 dicembre 2010 l’Unione europea ha notificato alle Isole Salomone il completamento da parte del Consiglio, a nome dell’Unione europea, delle procedure necessarie all’entrata in vigore del suddetto accordo, firmato a Bruxelles il 21 ottobre 2010.

Parimenti, le Isole Salomone hanno notificato il 9 marzo 2011 all’Unione europea il completamento delle proprie procedure di conclusione.

L’accordo è pertanto entrato in vigore il 9 marzo 2011 a norma dell’articolo 18 dello stesso.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTOINE GAUSE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 7:16

- cr - 00123

- BO

- 1; 7:18

- cv - 00189

- BO )

Submitted : March 14, 2019 Decided: March 19, 2019

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Antoine Gause, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antoine Gause seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of
app ealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable juri sts would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedur al grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the recor d and conclude that Gause has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gause’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### § 30.26 Consideration of tax consequences to the Government.

In negotiating a compromise, the Secretary will consider the tax consequences to the Government. In particular, the Secretary will consider requiring a waiver of tax-loss-carry-forward and tax-loss-carry-back rights of the debtor. For information on discharge of indebtedness reporting requirements see § 30.32.
#### § 1328.1 Definitions.

*States.* For the purpose of this part, “State” means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, and Guam.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Tennessee Republican Party Federal 

Election Account (A07-05) 

Agenda Documents No. 10-75, No. 10-

75-Aand No. 10-75-B 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission 

open meeting on January 20,2011, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 

5-1 to approve Agenda Document No. 10-75-B subject to restoring the volunteer materials 

exemption language that appears on pages 3,13, and 16. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen and Weintraub voted affirmatively 

for the decision. Commissioner Walther dissented. 

Attest: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RASC SERIES 2006-KS7 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Executive Vice President
§ 503.28 Record of closed meetings, or closed portion of a meeting. ( a ) The Commission will maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each closed meeting or closed portion of a meeting, except that in the case of a meeting or portion of a meeting closed to the public pursuant to § 503.24(d), (h), or (j), the Commission will maintain either a transcript or recording, or a detailed set of minutes.
( b ) Any minutes so maintained will fully and clearly describe all matters discussed and shall provide a full and accurate summary of any actions taken, and the reasons therefor, including a description of each of the views expressed on any item and the record of any rollcall vote. All documents considered in connection with any action will be identified in the minutes.
( c ) The Commission will promptly make available to the public, in its offices, the transcript, electronic recording, or minutes, of the discussion of any item on the agenda of a closed meeting, or closed portion of a meeting, except for the item or items of discussion which the Commission determines to contain information which may be withheld under § 503.24. Copies of the transcript or minutes, or a transcription of the recording, disclosing the identity of each speaker, will be furnished to any person at the actual cost of duplication or transcription.
( d ) The Commission will maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete copy of the minutes, or a complete electronic recording of each closed meeting or closed portion of a meeting for a period of two years after the date of the closed meeting or closed portion of a meeting.
( e ) All actions required or permitted by this section to be undertaken by the Commission will be by or under the authority of the Chair of the Commission.
§ 630.205 What must I include in my drug-free workplace statement? You must publish a statement that— ( a ) Tells your employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in your workplace;
( b ) Specifies the actions that you will take against employees for violating that prohibition; and
( c ) Lets each employee know that, as a condition of employment under any award, he or she: ( 1 ) Will abide by the terms of the statement; and
( 2 ) Must notify you in writing if he or she is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace and must do so no more than five calendar days after the conviction.