alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brad J. Peters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for GIC and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of GIC's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in GIC's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during GIC's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect GIC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. GIC's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect GIC's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in GIC's internal control over financial reporting,

|Date: March 14, 2008 | /s/    BRAD J. PETERS  
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Brad J. Peters         
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the fifth meeting of the American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

January 9, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. (You will need a photo ID to enter a Federal building.)

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​quality_​main.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the meeting, the Workgroup will continue their discussion on a core set of quality measures and on the specific charge to the Workgroup. The Workgroup  members will continue discussion on their work to envision and describe a world in which quality measurement and reporting are automated and clinical decision support is used to improve performance on those quality measures. This shared vision will be used to inform potential recommendations to the AHIC addressing the broad and specific charges to the Workgroup.

                    The meeting will be available via internet access. For additional information, go to                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​quality_​instruct.html.*

Dated: December 14, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-9809  Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
#### Darwin Rudd, Respondent, *v.*Isaac Winkler et a1., Trading under the Name of Isaac Winkler & Brother, Appellants.

*Budcl*v. *Winkler,*126 App. Div. 950, affirmed.

(Argued October 28, 1909;

decided November 16, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 15, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of sale.

*J\dius M.*Mayer, *Eugene Sondheim*and *A. S. Gilbert*for appellants.

*Henry*IF *Rudd*and *My Gready Syhes*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Varsity Group Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ James M. Craig           
|                       |  | James M. Craig               
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 46.101(i) or exempted under § 46.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
#### § 604.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
#### § 501.6 Documentary evidence.

Documentary evidence may consist of books, records, correspondence or other documents pertinent to any hearing, examination, or investigation within the jurisdiction of the Commission. The application for the issuance of subpoenas for production of documents must specify the books, records, correspondence or other documents sought. The production of documentary evidence will not be required at any place other than the witness's place of business. The production of such documents will not be required at any place if, prior to the return date specified in the subpoena, the person either has furnished the issuer of the subpoena with a properly certified copy of the documents or has entered into a stipulation as to the information contained in the documents.
\ 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

; In the Matter of ) 

) A15-11 

Proposed Final Audit Report on ) 

American Financial Services Association ) 

PAC • ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on July 21,2017, the Commission decided 

by a vote of S-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Rq>ort on American 

Financial Services Association, as recommended in the Memorandum from the 

Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated July 18,2017. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: • : 2.4,2.011 

J / Date Dayna C.Brown 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
..

-

_.

PUBLIC ISSUA~CB OF AUDIT REPORT -

CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP PROGRAM

FHIm EILAND

PRESS OFFIC~ J

BOB COSTA fI~

JUDY HAWKINS

Wt\SItI:-;C10N III ~1I4hl

FEDERAL 1'1 [eTION COMMISSION

cc: FEC Library

RAD __Public Recor.d

Attachment as stated

January 4, 1980

All informational copies of this report have been

received by all parties involved and this report may be

released to the public •

Attached please find a copy of the final audit report

of the Constructive Citizenship Program which was approved

by the Commission on December 12, 1979.

SUBJECT:

FROM:

THROUGH:

MEMORANDUM

TO:

•

•
". , ..

-

•

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

\\"\SII I:-;C; ION, .1 r .'1141>1

REPOH'l' OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON TIlE.

CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP PROGRAM

·1. Background

A. Overview

This audit report is based on an audit of the .",1

Constructive Citizenship Program (lithe Committee ll), undertaken 't..

by the Audit Division of the Federal Election Commission in 3:

accordance with the Conunission'saudit policy, to determine .'..

whether there has been compliance with the provisions of the ,':.

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Act ll) •..:)

The audit was conducted pursuant to Section 438(a) (8) of Title 2,~

of the United States Code, which directs the Conunission to make -;

from time to time audits and field investigations with respect :~

to reports and statements filed under the provisions of the Act.~.::

The Conunittee registered with the United States House ;

of Representatives on May 5, 1972, as the corporate political ., ., action committee connected to Texas Instruments, Inc.

The audit covered the period from January 1, 1977 thro~gh

:;'.lptember 30, 1979, the final coverage date of the latest report:

filed bv the Conunittee at the time of the audit. The Conunittee.:,.·

reported a beginning cash balance on January 1, 1977 of $9,583.~3,

total receipts for the period of $22,257.03, total expenditures·:.

of $23,719.88, and a closing cash balance on September 30, 1979., of

$8,121.08. ..

This audit report is based on documents and working I,

papers which support each of its factual statements. They form

part of the record upon which the Con~ission based its decisio~

on the matters in this report and were available to Conunissioners

and appropriate staff members for review. : .
C. Scope

13. Key Pcrsotllll·l

-2-

B3sed upon examination of the reports and statements filed

and the records presented by the constructive Citizenship

Program, no materiill problems in complying with the Federal

Elt!ction Campaign Act were discoverod during the course of the

audi t.

II. Finding and Recommendation

The audit included such tests as verification of total

receipts and expenditures and individual transactions; review

of required supportiny documentation; analysis of Conunittee debts

and obligations; and, such other audit procedures as deemed

necessary under the circumstances.

The principoll officers of the Conunittee during the

pcriou covered by the iludit were Mr. A. Ray McCord, Chairmiln

and Mr. Liston M. Ric~, Jr., Treasurer.

•

•

•
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST] Group No. 23, Maine

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Maine. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register.**

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The lands we surveyed are:

*Township 2, Range 8, North of Waldo Patent (T. 2, R. 8, N. W. P.), Penobscot County, Maine*

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey and survey of the boundaries of lands held in trust for the Penobscot Indian Nation in Township 2, Range 8, North of Waldo Patent Penobscot County, Maine and was accepted December 8, 2006. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown in the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.

Dated: December 14, 2006.

Michael W. Young,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 06-9796 Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M
§ 1620.3 Establishing priorities. ( a ) The governing body of a recipient must adopt procedures for establishing priorities for the use of all of its Corporation and non-Corporation resources and must adopt a written statement of priorities, pursuant to those procedures, that determines the cases and matters which may be undertaken by the recipient.
( b ) The procedures adopted must include an effective appraisal of the needs of eligible clients in the geographic area served by the recipient, and their relative importance, based on information received from potential or current eligible clients that is solicited in a manner reasonably calculated to obtain the views of all significant segments of the client population. The appraisal must also include and be based on information from the recipient's employees, governing body members, the private bar, and other interested persons. The appraisal should address the need for outreach, training of the recipient's employees, and support services.
( c ) The following factors shall be among those considered by the recipient in establishing priorities: ( 1 ) The suggested priorities promulgated by the Legal Services Corporation;
( 2 ) The appraisal described in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 3 ) The population of eligible clients in the geographic areas served by the recipient, including all significant segments of that population with special legal problems or special difficulties of access to legal services;
( 4 ) The resources of the recipient;
( 5 ) The availability of another source of free or low-cost legal assistance in a particular category of cases or matters;
( 6 ) The availability of other sources of training, support, and outreach services;
( 7 ) The relative importance of particular legal problems to the individual clients of the recipient;
( 8 ) The susceptibility of particular problems to solution through legal processes;
( 9 ) Whether legal efforts by the recipient will complement other efforts to solve particular problems in the area served;
( 10 ) Whether legal efforts will result in efficient and economic delivery of legal services; and
( 11 ) Whether there is a need to establish different priorities in different parts of the recipient's service area.
#### § 2105.34 Can an Agency release information protected by Exemption 4?

If an Agency determines that the requested information is protected from release by Exemption 4 of the FOIA, the Agency has no discretion to release the information. Release of information protected from release by Exemption 4 is prohibited by the Trade Secrets Act, a criminal provision found at 18 U.S.C. 1905.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

p0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147803 & (128)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147803

COA: 297769

Oakland CC: 2009

- 229124

- FH

JASON RICHARD ROSE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for

miscellaneous relief is DENI ED.
#### § 286.145 What is the penalty if an individual refuses to engage in work activities?

If an individual refuses to engage in work activities in accordance with the minimum work participation requirements specified in the approved TFAP, the Tribe must apply to the individual the penalties against individuals that were established in the approved TFAP.
#### § 1228.8 Do loans of temporary records require NARA approval?

Loans of temporary records between Federal agencies or to non-Federal recipients do not require approval from NARA. The lending agency is responsible for documenting the loan and return of the records.
§ 305.31 Amount of incentive payment. ( a ) The incentive payment for a State for a fiscal year is equal to the incentive payment pool for the fiscal year, multiplied by the State incentive payment share for the fiscal year.
( b ) The incentive payment pool is: ( 1 ) $422,000,000 for fiscal year 2000;
( 2 ) $429,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;
( 3 ) $450,000,000 for fiscal year 2002;
( 4 ) $461,000,000 for fiscal year 2003;
( 5 ) $454,000,000 for fiscal year 2004;
( 6 ) $446,000,000 for fiscal year 2005;
( 7 ) $458,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
( 8 ) $471,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
( 9 ) $483,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and
( 10 ) For any succeeding fiscal year, the amount of the incentive payment pool for the fiscal year that precedes such succeeding fiscal year multiplied by the percentage (if any) by which the CPI for such preceding fiscal year exceeds the CPI for the second preceding fiscal year. In other words, for each fiscal year following fiscal year 2008, the incentive payment pool will be multiplied by the percentage increase in the CPI between the two preceding years. For example, if the CPI increases by 1 percent between fiscal years 2007 and 2008, then the incentive pool for fiscal year 2009 would be a 1 percent increase over the $483,000,000 incentive payment pool for fiscal year 2008, or $487,830,000.
( c ) The State incentive payment share for a fiscal year is the incentive base amount for the State for the fiscal year divided by the sum of the incentive base amounts for all of the States for the fiscal year.
( d ) A State's maximum incentive base amount for a fiscal year is the State's collections base for the fiscal year for the paternity establishment, support order, and current collections performance measures and 75 percent of the State's collections base for the fiscal year for the arrearage collections and cost-effectiveness performance measures.
( e ) A State's maximum incentive base amount for a State for a fiscal year is zero, unless a Federal audit performed under § 305.60 of this part determines that the data submitted by the State for the fiscal year and used to determine the performance level involved are complete and reliable.
( f ) A State's collections base for a fiscal year is equal to: two times the sum of the total amount of support collected for Current Assistance cases plus two times the total amount of support collected in Former Assistance cases, plus the total amount of support collected in Never Assistance/other cases during the fiscal year, that is: 2(Current Assistance collections + Former Assistance collections) + all other collections.