alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-5300 September Term, 2016

1:14-cv-01419-CRC

Filed On: May 31, 2017 [1677406]

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in

Washington and Melanie T. Sloan,

 Appellees

v.

Federal Election Commission, 

 Appellee

American Action Network, Inc.,

 Appellant

------------------------------

Consolidated with 16-5343

M A N D A T E

In accordance with the order of April 4, 2017, and pursuant to Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 41, this constitutes the formal mandate of this court.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken R. Meadows

Deputy Clerk

Link to the order filed April 4, 2017

USCA Case #16-5300 Document #1677406 Filed: 05/31/2017 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1687 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1687

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the federally occupied building located at McKinley Avenue 
   and Third Street, SW., Canton, Ohio, as the ``Ralph Regula Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RALPH REGULA FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.
    (a) Designation.--The Administrator of General Services shall 
ensure that the federally occupied building located at McKinley Avenue 
and Third Street, SW., Canton, Ohio, is known and designated as the 
``Ralph Regula Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--With respect to the period in which the building 
referred to in subsection (a) is federally occupied, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Ralph Regula Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 1351.16 What costs are not allowable under a Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant? ( a ) A Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant does not cover the capital costs of constructing new facilities, or operating costs of existing community centers or other facilities that are used partially or incidentally for services to runaway or homeless youth clients, except to the extent justified by application of cost allocation methods accepted by HHS as reasonable and appropriate.
( b ) A Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant does not cover any treatment or referral to treatment that aims to change someone's sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.
[81 FR 93061, Dec. 20, 2016]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A OF GOLDLEAF FINANCIALSOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006**

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to theundersigned’s best knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q/A for Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for theperiod ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”):

|   | (a)    | fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (b)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theIssuer. |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

          This Certificationis executed as of March 28, 2007.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

|   |   | /s/ G. Lynn   Boggs       |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                           |
|   |   | G. Lynn   Boggs           |
|   |   | Chief   Executive Officer |
Material Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes 

for Molecular Identity (MI) Determination & Nomenclature 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

May 2010 

Docket Identification Number 

 EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0252
Material Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes 

for Molecular Identity (MI) Determination & Nomenclature 

Structural features that may be important 

Primary MI features: 

1. Molecular Weight 

2. wall/tube number 

• e.g., single-, double-, multi-walled (average, range) 

• for multi-walled: concentric cylinders (“Russian Doll” ) or scroll (rolled up 

“Parchment”) 

3. wall/tube ends 

• e.g., open, individually capped, ends connected together in a circular or loop 

shape 

4. tube length (average, range) 

5. wall/tube width/diameter 

• outer wall/tube and inner cavity (average, range) 

6. ring size/connectivity 

• 6-membered (typically), but also provide % (?) 5 and/or 7 and/or 7+ 

7. hexagonal array orientation 

• armchair, zig-zag, chiral (determined by chiral angle/vector measurement) 

8. alignment of long axis 

• e.g., straight, bent, buckled, branched, helical, circular, spaghetti-like 

• cause if other than straight (e.g., stress or structural) 

Secondary MI features: 

1. deformities 

• e.g., bumps, gaps 

2. ring hybridization 

• graphene (typically) 

 graphyne (theoretically; e.g., bow-tie, linear, star) 

3. agglomeration, aggregation 

Other relevant information: 

1. manufacture 

• method (e.g., CA, CVD, PLV, HiPCO) 

• catalyst (chemical identity, quantity used and incorporated, particle size) 

2. purity 

• impurity type, amount, and source 

3. complexation, surface treatment, encapsulation (entrainment) 

• non-covalent 

• e.g., coated, modified, other 

4. doping 

5. uses
§ 612.6 Responses to requests. ( a ) *Acknowledgment of requests.* The NSF or OIG will ordinarily send an email acknowledgment of all FOIA requests with an assigned request number for further reference and an estimated response date.
( b ) *Grants of requests.* Once the NSF makes a determination to grant a request in whole or in part, it will notify the requester in writing. The NSF will inform the requester in the notice of any applicable fee and will disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of applicable fees. Records disclosed in part will be marked or annotated to show both the amount and the location of the information deleted where practicable.
( c ) *Denials of requests.* ( 1 ) Denials of FOIA requests will be made by the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of the Inspector General, or such other office as may be designated by the Director. The response letter will briefly set forth the reasons for the denial, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied in denying the request. It will also provide the name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial, will inform the requester of the right to appeal, and will, where appropriate, include an estimate of the volume of any requested materials withheld. An estimate need not be provided when the volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption.
( 2 ) Requesters can appeal an agency determination to withhold all or part of any requested record; a determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that what has been requested is not a record subject to the Act; a disapproval of a fee category claim by a requester; denial of a fee waiver or reduction; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment (see § 612.9).
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

in ttie Matter of ) 

) A09-25 

Proposed Final Audit Report on ) Agenda Documents No. 13-06 and No. 

Ri^tmarcfa.com PAC, Lie. ) 13-06-A 

CERTMCATION 

I, Sfaawn Woodfaead Wertfa, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission 

open meeting on February 14,2013, do hereby certify that tfae Commission decided by a vote of 

4-1 to approve tfae Proposed Final Audit Report on Rigifatmarcfa.com PAC, Inc. as found in 

Agenda Document No. 13-06-A and autfaorize tfae Audit Division to make any tecfamcal and 

conforming edits. 

Commissioners Hunter, McGafan II, Petersen, and Weintraub voted afiSrmatively for tfae 

decision. Commissioner Walther dissented. 

Attest: 

Shawn Woodfaead Wertfa 

Secretary and Clj^k of the (^mmissip^
#### § 400.48 Basis and scope.

This subpart sets forth requirements concerning grants to States under section 412(e) of the Act for refugee cash assistance (RCA). Sections 400.48 through 400.55 apply to both public/private RCA programs and publicly-administered RCA programs.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 8 (Friday, January 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1494-1495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-104]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Board of Regents of the Uniformed Services 
University of the Health Sciences

AGENCY: Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU).

ACTION: Quarterly meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The actions that will take place include the approval of 
minutes from the Board of Regents Meeting held November 13, 2006; 
acceptance of administrative reports; approval of faculty appointments 
and promotions; and the awarding of post-baccalaureate masters and 
doctoral degrees in the biomedical sciences and public health. The 
President, USU; Dean, USU School of Medicine; and Acting Dean, USU 
Graduate School of Nursing will also present reports. These actions are 
necessary for the University to remain an accredited medical school and 
to pursue our mission, which is to provide trained health care 
personnel to the uniformed services.

DATES: February 5, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.

[[Page 1495]]


ADDRESSES: Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Board 
of Regents Conference Room (D3001), 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, 
MD 20814-4799.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet S. Taylor, Designated Federal 
Official, Board of Regents, 301.295.3066.

    Dated: January 8, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-104 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Dear Jacob K. Javits Project Director:

Enclosed please find the instructions and forms necessary to complete your Final Performance 

Report (FPR) for the Fiscal Year (FY) XXXX Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program. Attachment B of your 

FY XXXX grant award notification requires all institutional grant recipients to submit a final 

performance report within 90 days after the end date of the grant. The U.S. Department of 

Education is requesting information on students who received Jacob K. Javits fellowships through a 

grant to your institution that began on September 1, XXXX, and ended on August 31, XXXX. Please 

be sure to complete and submit the enclosed report form on or before the due date, [insert date]. 

NOTE: You are not required to submit a FPR by [insert date] if your FY XXXX project period has been 

extended beyond August 31, XXXX. However, you will need to provide information on any student 

within that cohort within 90 days after the extended end date of your grant. 

This FPR for the Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program is used to collect information that will help the 

U.S. Department of Education to assess the Javits program’s accomplishments towards meeting the 

requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). The two GPRA performance 

measures for the Javits program are:

1. Time to degree completion for Javits Fellows will be less than the national average of 7.5 

years

2. The percentage of Javits Fellows obtaining graduate degrees will be greater than the 

national average (30%)

The GPRA efficiency measure for the Javits program is:

1. The Federal cost per terminal degree (Ph.D., M.F.A.) awarded for the Javits Fellowship 

Program

Other data collected by the report will provide valuable information on how the fellows finance the 

remainder of their graduate education beyond the 4-year performance period of the Javits 

fellowship and the types of employment they pursue. As a Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program 

Coordinator, obligation to respond to this FPR is required to obtain or retain Jacob K. Javits 

Fellowship Program benefits. 

Definitions:

Budget Period - A one-year interval of time within a project period, which exists for budget reporting 

purposes.

Project Period - The four-year period that is the total length of the grant.

Please feel free to contact me at Carmen.Gordon@ed.gov or 202-219-7138 should you have any 

questions. 
Thank you for your continued support of the Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program.

Sincerely, 

Carmen Gordon

Program Specialist

Jacob K. Javits Fellowship Program
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.114 Cooperative research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.
§ 702.18 Commission reports. ( a ) If a Commission report tends to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person, the report or relevant portions thereof shall be delivered to such person at least 30 days before the report is made public to allow such person to make a timely verified answer to the report. The Commission shall afford such person an opportunity to file with the Commission a verified answer to the report or relevant portions thereof not later than 20 days after service as provided by the regulations in this part. ( 1 ) Such person shall be served with a copy of the report or relevant portions thereof, with an indication of the section(s) that the Commission has determined tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate such person, a copy of the Act, and a copy of the regulations in this part.
( 2 ) The report or relevant portions thereof, the Act, and regulations in this part shall be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by leaving a copy thereof at the last known residence or business address or the agent of such person.
( 3 ) The date of service for the purposes of this section shall be the day the material is delivered either by the post office or otherwise, to such person or the agent of such person or at the last known residence or business address of such person. The acknowledgement of the party served or the verified return of the one making service shall be proof of service except that when service is made by mail, the return post office receipt shall also constitute proof of same.
( b ) If a person receiving a Commission report or relevant portions thereof under this part requests an extension of time from the Commission within seven days of service of such report, the Commission may, upon a showing of good cause, grant the person additional time within which to file a verified answer.
( c ) A verified answer shall plainly and concisely state the facts and law constituting the person's reply or defense to the charges or allegations contained in the report.
( d ) Such verified answer shall be published as an appendix to the report; however, the Commission may except from the answer such matter as it determines to be scandalous, prejudicial, or unnecessary.
From: Wade Emmert 

Sent By: wade^emmeit.me 

To: pn»rthen(a>fec,flpy 

Subject: Re: Dallas County Republican Party DFAR Request or waiver of a hearing 

Date: 12/11/2013 12:14 PM 

That is correct. 

Wade 

Wade Emmert 

Chairman 

Dallas County Republican Party 

(469) 444-1467 

wadetg^dallasgopor^ 

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, <pnurthen(S)fec.gov> wrote: 

Wade, just for the record, I am assuming that you have no further response 

regarding the Draft Final Audit Report, correct? 

From: v\tade Emmert <wade@dalasgQP,QrgTo: 

Cc: James Carter <james<gdallasgQD.Qrq>. Gober Hilgers <pQber<g>aQberhil9ers.comi 

Date: 12/11/2013 11:53 AM 

Subject. Re: Dallas County Republican Party DFAR Request or waiver of a hearing 

Sent by: wadefaemmert me 

Hi Paula, 

The Committee will waive our right to a hearing. 

Wade Emmert 

Chabman 

Dallas County Republican Party 

IAS9\ 444-1467 

wade@dalla5qoD.orQ
#### §§ 1706.104-1706.109 [Reserved]
#### L. J. McDowell, Respondent, *v.*The City of Auburn, Appellant.

*McDowell*v. *City of Auburn,*126 App. Div. 173, affirmed.

(Submitted December 2, 1909;

decided December 17, 1907.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered *530May 6, 1908, which reversed a judgment of the Cayuga County Court in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*J. Henry Kerr*for appellant.

*Frank C. Cushing*and *Charles A. Wright*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cüllen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hisoooic and Chase, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.207 Research not otherwise approvable which presents an opportunity to understand, prevent, or alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of pregnant women, fetuses, or neonates. The Secretary will conduct or fund research that the IRB does not believe meets the requirements of § 46.204 or § 46.205 only if: ( a ) The IRB finds that the research presents a reasonable opportunity to further the understanding, prevention, or alleviation of a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of pregnant women, fetuses or neonates; and
( b ) The Secretary, after consultation with a panel of experts in pertinent disciplines (for example: science, medicine, ethics, law) and following opportunity for public review and comment, including a public meeting announced in the Federal Register, has determined either: ( 1 ) That the research in fact satisfies the conditions of § 46.204, as applicable; or
( 2 ) The following: ( i ) The research presents a reasonable opportunity to further the understanding, prevention, or alleviation of a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of pregnant women, fetuses or neonates;
( ii ) The research will be conducted in accord with sound ethical principles; and
( iii ) Informed consent will be obtained in accord with the informed consent provisions of subpart A and other applicable subparts of this part.
#### § 2540.510 What are the restrictions on using national service insignia?

The national service insignia are owned by the Corporation and only may be used as authorized. The national service insignia may not be used by non-federal entities for fundraising purposes or in a manner that suggests Corporation endorsement.