alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of Network Installation Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the  "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge, that:

The  quarterly  report  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB/A  fairly  presents,  in  all material respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


/s/  Jeffrey  R.  Hultman
--------------------------------------
Jeffrey  R.  Hultman
Chief  Executive  Officer
Dated:  November  22,  2005

/s/  Michael  V.  Rosenthal
--------------------------------------
Michael  V.  Rosenthal
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
Dated:  November  22,  2005
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

July 13, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia Carmona 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Joseph F. Stoltz 

Assistant Staff Director 

FROM: Christopher Hughey 7?cl^ 

Deputy General Counsel f 

Lawrence L. Calvert, Jr. "^^^f^ 

Associate General Counsel — 

Lorenzo Holloway » 

Assistant General Counsel 

For PubUc Finance and Audit Advice 

Albert Veldhuyzen /it ^ 

Attomey 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee 

(LRA #823) 

The Office of General Counsel ("OGC") has reviewed the Interim Audit Report 

("Proposed Report") on the Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee 

("Committee'*). We concur with the findings in the Proposed Report (Finding 1—^Misstatement 

of Financial Activity; Finding 2—Recordkeeping for Salaries, Wages, and Fringe Benefits of 

Allocable Employees). 

In the Proposed Report's cover memorandum, the Audit Division requested comments on 

whether certain disbursements were correctly reported as operating expenditures. OGC has 

decided not to comment on this issue in the context of this particular audit. The issue does not 

meet the materiality threshold to be included as a finding in the Proposed Report. Therefore, 

commenting on this issue in coimection with the Proposed Report would confuse the record in 

this particular audit. After discussions with you, we understand that you concur in this course of 

action. We appreciate that the Audit Division previewed this issue for us with a written 

summary in the cover memorandum because this summary will allow us to start considering the 
Memorandum to Patricia Carmona 

lAR on Indiana Democrats 

LRA #823 

Page 2 

issue should it arise in any future audits.' If you have any questions, please contact Albert R. 

Veldhuyzen, the attomey assigned to this audit.^ 

' We encourage the Audit Division to raise this issue, pursuant to Commission Directive 69, as a request for 

informal guidance or comments on a draft audit report for any audit for which the issue will be included as a finding, 

or for which the answer to tiie question will determine whether or not there is a finding. 

^ The Office of the General Counsel recommends that the Commission consider this document in Executive 

Session because the Commission may eventually decide to pursue an investigation of matters contained in the 

Proposed Report. 11 C.F.R. §§ 2.4(a) and (b)(6).
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/29/15

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Carolinas Air Pollution Control Association 

Spring Meeting

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at Carolinas Air 

Pollution Control Association Fall Meeting in Asheville, NC, on April 9, 2015. The Clean 

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Beverly Banister/EPA R4

External Stakeholders

Sheila Holman/North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Myra Reese/South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Approximately 450 other attendees

ATTACHMENT
## PHANTOM 2 Kits Release Note

© 201 4 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved D ate : February 21 , 2014 PHANTOM 2 FPV HUB Kit Instruction : V1. 1 PHANTOM 2 Prop Guard Attachment Instructions : V1.00 PHANTOM 2 Car Charger Instruction: V1.0 

### February 21, 2014 PHANTOM 2 Car Charger released DJI P hantom 2 car charger has been rele ased to provide outdoor charging solutions for the PHANTOM 2 battery. PHANTOM 2 Car Charger I n the kit Car charger and instructions F unction Used to charge the PHANTOM 2 in - car or through 3S - 6S Li - Po batteries. F eature C onvenient , practical outdoor c harging solutions for the PHANTOM 2 battery. 

### FPV Hub Kit Instruction has released V1.1 FPV Hub Kit Instruction V1.1 has a dded description of using FPV Hub to connect the H3 - 2D gimbal, GCU and other devices on non - PHANTOM 2 flight platforms .

## PHANTOM 2 Kits Release Note

© 201 4 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved D ate : January 2 4 , 2014 PHANTOM 2 FPV HUB Ki t Instruction : V1.0 PHANTOM 2 Prop Guard Attachment Instructions : V1.00 

### January 2 4 , 2014 PHANTOM 2 kits The follow ing kits have been released for the DJI P hantom 2. PHANTOM 2 FPV HUB I n the kit FPV HUB, cables and instructions F unction Customiz ed ports and cables for iOSD mini , iOSD Mark II or AVL5 8. F eature FPV HUB ’s integrated iOSD mini , iOSD Mark II or AVL58 ports, connecting directly to the PHANTOM 2

central board and built - in main controller through an 8 - Pin cable. This simplifies connecti ng these items and eliminates the need for soldering. PHANTOM 2 Camera Mounting Bracket I n the kit C amera mounting bracket and screws F unction Attachment for GoPro cameras and others . F eature Gimbal free camera attachment for GoPro and similar camer as. PHANTOM 2 Prop Guard I n the kit 4 p rop guards and instruction s F unction Fitted under the rotors to prevent damage to rotors or surroundings. F eature E asy to attach, lightweight, safe and reliable. I mportant Notes: 1. Make sure the PHANTOM 2 w eighs no more than 1350g after mounting prop guards. A ny extra weight will compromise flight capabilities causing a safety risk. T he total weight of a PHANTOM 2 with H3 - 2D gimbal, iOSD and wireless video transmitter will be over 1300g, prop guards are not recommended for similarly equipped PHANTOM 2s.
364 P.2d 158

#### T. L. PENCE & Thomas C. Pence, Plaintiffs-Respondents. v. BIG LOST RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8967.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 30, 1961.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 8, 1961.

Robert M. Kerr, Jr., Blackfoot, George Barnard, Idaho Falls, for appellant.

Furey & Furey, Sherman F. Furey, Jr., Salmon, and Jack B. Furey, Challis, Robert H. Copple, Boise, for respondents.

KNUDSON, Justice.

By virtue and under the authority of the decision filed this date in the case of Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 83 Idaho 374, 364 P.2d 146, the judgment for damages entered by the trial court in favor of respondents in this action is affirmed. The order of injunction is set aside. No costs allowed.

TAYLÓR, C. J., and SMITH, Mc-QUADE and McFADDEN, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

END CITIZENS UNITED PAC,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant,

and

NEW REPUBLICAN PAC,

Intervenor-Defendant.

Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-2128-RJL

INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT’S 

COMBINED RESPONSE IN 

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 7(h), Intervenor-Defendant 

New Republican PAC respectfully opposes Plaintiff End Citizens United PAC’s Motion for 

Default Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, and cross-moves for 

summary judgment. 

This motion is supported by the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities in 

Support of Intervenor-Defendant’s Combined Opposition to Plaintiff’s motion and Cross-Motion 

for summary judgment. A proposed Order is also attached.

Wherefore, Intervenor-Defendant respectfully requests that this Court deny Plaintiff’s

Motion for Default Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Judgment and grant IntervenorDefendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.

Case 1:21-cv-02128-RJL Document 26 Filed 01/18/22 Page 1 of 3
Dated: January 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jason Torchinsky

Jason Torchinsky (DC Bar No. 976033)

Jessica F. Johnson (DC Bar No. 976688)

HOLTZMAN VOGEL BARAN 

TORCHINSKY & JOSEFIAK, PLLC

2300 N Street NW, Suite 643A

Washington D.C. 20037

Phone: (202) 737-8808

Fax: (540) 341-8809

Email: jtorchinsky@holztmanvogel.com

Jessica@holtzmanvogel.com

J. Michael Bayes (DC Bar No. 501845)

Phillip M. Gordon (DC Bar No. 1531277)

HOLTZMAN VOGEL BARAN 

TORCHINSKY & JOSEFIAK, PLLC

15405 John Marshall Highway

Haymarket, VA 20169

Washington D.C. 20037

Phone: (202) 737-8808

Fax: (540) 341-8809

Email: mbayes@holtzmanvogel.com

pgordon@holtzmanvogel.com

Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendant 

Case 1:21-cv-02128-RJL Document 26 Filed 01/18/22 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 18, 2022, I served the foregoing on all counsel of record through 

this Court’s CM/ECF system. I further certify that on January 19, 2022, I served the foregoing on 

the FEC by USPS First Class mail.

/s/Jason Torchinsky

Case 1:21-cv-02128-RJL Document 26 Filed 01/18/22 Page 3 of 3
#### § 402.30 Basis of awards.

The Secretary will award funds in a fiscal year under § 402.31 or § 402.33 to States with approved applications for that fiscal year in accordance with the apportionment of funds from the Office of Management and Budget. The Secretary will award funds under § 402.34 to States whose annual reports submitted pursuant to § 402.51 establish that their allowable SLIAG-related costs exceed the total of their allotments, as determined under §§ 402.31 and 402.33. The grant award constitutes the authority to draw and expend funds for the purposes set forth in the Act and this regulation.

[53 FR 7858, Mar. 10, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 65727, Dec. 21, 1994]
#### Eleanora Falkowska, Respondent, *v.*Ludwig Zemrak, Appellant.

*Makowtfca*v. *Zemrak,*131 App. Div. 936, affirmed.

(Argued January 26, 1910;

decided February 15, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 22, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for slander.

*John V. Maloney*for appellant.

*Julius A. Grass*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscogk and Chase, JJ.
#### §§ 606.31-606.39 [Reserved]
§ 402.1 General. ( a ) These regulations implement section 204 of Pub. L. 99-603, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), as amended. This act establishes a temporary program of State Legalization Impact Assistance Grants (SLIAG) for States. The purpose of SLIAG is to lessen the financial impact on State and local governments resulting from the adjustment of immigration status under the Act of certain groups of aliens residing in the States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.
( b ) Funds appropriated by section 204 may be applied by States with approved applications to certain State and local government costs incurred: ( 1 ) In providing public assistance and public health assistance to eligible legalized aliens,
( 2 ) For making payments to State educational agencies for the purpose of assisting local educational agencies in providing certain educational services to eligible legalized aliens,
( 3 ) To provide public education and outreach to lawful temporary resident aliens concerning the adjustment to lawful permanent resident status and other matters,
( 4 ) To make payments for education and outreach efforts by State agencies regarding unfair discrimination in employment practices based on national origin or citizenship status, and
( 5 ) To administer the funds provided under this part.
[56 FR 21246, May 7, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1752 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1752

To provide that the usual day for paying salaries in or under the House 
 of Representatives may be established by regulations of the Committee 
                        on House Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2009

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the usual day for paying salaries in or under the House 
 of Representatives may be established by regulations of the Committee 
                        on House Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH 
              DAY FOR PAYING SALARIES IN OR UNDER THE HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES.

    Section 116(a) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2002 
(2 U.S.C. 60d-1) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the Committee on 
House Administration may by regulation provide for the payment of 
salaries with respect to a month on a date other than the date provided 
under the previous sentence as may be necessary to conform to generally 
accepted accounting practices.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 60.5 When information must be reported. Information required under §§ 60.7, 60.8, and 60.12 must be submitted to the NPDB within 30 days following the action to be reported, beginning with actions occurring on or after September 1, 1990; information required under § 60.11 must be submitted to the NPDB within 30 days following the action to be reported, beginning with actions occurring on or after January 1, 1992; and information required under §§ 60.9, 60.10, 60.13, 60.14, 60.15, and 60.16 must be submitted to the NPDB within 30 days following the action to be reported, beginning with actions occurring on or after August 21, 1996. Persons or entities responsible for submitting reports of malpractice payments (§ 60.7), negative actions or findings (§ 60.11), or adverse actions (§ 60.12) must additionally provide to their respective state authorities a copy of the report they submit to the NPDB. Following is the list of reportable actions: ( a ) Malpractice payments (§ 60.7);
( b ) Licensure and certification actions (§§ 60.8, 60.9, and 60.10);
( c ) Negative actions or findings (§ 60.11);
( d ) Adverse actions (§ 60.12);
( e ) Health Care-related Criminal Convictions (§ 60.13);
( f ) Health Care-related Civil Judgments (§ 60.14);
( g ) Exclusions from Federal or state health care programs (§ 60.15); and
( h ) Other adjudicated actions of decisions (§ 60.16).
[78 FR 20484, Apr. 5, 2013, 78 FR 25860, May 6, 2013]
§ 156.1250 Acceptance of certain third party payments. Issuers offering individual market QHPs, including stand-alone dental plans, and their downstream entities, must accept premium and cost-sharing payments for the QHPs from the following third-party entities from plan enrollees (in the case of a downstream entity, to the extent the entity routinely collects premiums or cost sharing): ( a ) A Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program under title XXVI of the Public Health Service Act;
( b ) An Indian tribe, tribal organization, or urban Indian organization; and
( c ) A local, State, or Federal government program, including a grantee directed by a government program to make payments on its behalf.
[81 FR 12352, Mar. 8, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,074
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,945
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     71,321
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             607
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               615
<LOANS>                                        446,048
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (5,673)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 536,919
<DEPOSITS>                                     357,739
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,659
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 536,919
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,701
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,661
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,362
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,522
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,748
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,614
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (21)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,597
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,597
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,106
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.32
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,518
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,051
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,935
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,689
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       41
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,673
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,472
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,201


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-51 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
§ 31.6 Review of Departmental records. ( a ) To inspect or copy Departmental records relating to the debt, the debtor must send a written request to the address designated in the notice described in section 31.5. The request must be received by the Department within 60 days from the date of the notice.
( b ) In response to a timely request as described in paragraph (a) of this section, the designated Department official shall notify the debtor of the location and time when the debtor may inspect and copy such records. If the debtor is unable to personally inspect such records as the result of geographical or other constraints, the Department will arrange to send copies of the records to the debtor.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

____________________________________ 

) 

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ) 

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON and ) 

MELANIE SLOAN, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) No. 1:10-cv-01350-RMC 

 v. ) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

____________________________________) 

FEC EXHIBIT 1 

Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-01350-RMC Document 5 Filed 10/12/10 Page 8 of 8