alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

64627 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 212 

Thursday, November 2, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8080 of October 31, 2006 

Veterans Day, 2006 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Through the generations, America’s men and women in uniform have defeated tyrants, liberated continents, and set a standard of courage and idealism for the entire world. On Veterans Day, our Nation pays tribute to 

those who have proudly served in our Armed Forces. 

To protect the Nation they love, our veterans stepped forward when America 

needed them most. In conflicts around the world, their sacrifice and resolve 

helped destroy the enemies of freedom and saved millions from oppression. 

In answering history’s call with honor, decency, and resolve, our veterans 

have shown the power of liberty and earned the respect and admiration 

of a grateful Nation. 

All of America’s veterans have placed our Nation’s security before their 

own lives, creating a debt that we can never fully repay. Our veterans 

represent the best of America, and they deserve the best America can give 

them. 

As we recall the service of our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and 

Coast Guardsmen, we are reminded that the defense of freedom comes 

with great loss and sacrifice. This Veterans Day, we give thanks to those 

who have served freedom’s cause; we salute the members of our Armed 

Forces who are confronting our adversaries abroad; and we honor the men 

and women who left America’s shores but did not live to be thanked 

as veterans. They will always be remembered by our country. 

With respect for and in recognition of the contributions our service men 

and women have made to the cause of peace and freedom around the 

world, the Congress has provided (5 U.S.C. 6103(a)) that November 11 of 

each year shall be set aside as a legal public holiday to honor veterans. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim November 11, 2006, as Veterans Day and 

urge all Americans to observe November 5 through November 11, 2006, 

as National Veterans Awareness Week. I encourage all Americans to recognize 

the valor and sacrifice of our veterans through ceremonies and prayers. 

I call upon Federal, State, and local officials to display the flag of the 

United States and to support and participate in patriotic activities in their 

communities. I invite civic and fraternal organizations, places of worship, 

schools, businesses, unions, and the media to support this national observance with commemorative expressions and programs. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES6
64628 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06–9069 

Filed 11–1–06; 11:31 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES6GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
§ 2554.39 How is the case decided? ( a ) The ALJ will issue an initial decision based only on the record. It will contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The ALJ will serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after close of the hearing or expiration of any allowed time for submission of post-hearing briefs. If the ALJ fails to meet this deadline, he or she shall promptly notify the parties of the reason for the delay and set a new deadline.
( c ) The findings of fact must include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether any one or more of the claims or statements identified in the complaint violate this part; and
( 2 ) If the defendant is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments, considering any mitigating or aggravating factors.
( d ) The initial decision will include a description of the right of a defendant found liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the authority head.
#### § 2301.140 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75731-75734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-07]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, 
(703) 601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-07 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 75732]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.014


[[Page 75733]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.015


[[Page 75734]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.016

[FR Doc. 06-9745 Filed 12-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
# STATEOFLOUISIANA
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2023 KW 0414 VERSUS 

### SPECIALIST CALEB D. JONES 

### JUNE 1, 2023 In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for rehearing, Special

Court -Martial, Parish of Lafayette, No. 

### 2002-341. BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.



### APPLICATION FORREHEARING DENIED. bIRT CHH Chutz, J., dissents and would 

### deny the application for rehearing.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### § 2540.650 How may I contest a reviewing official's decision to uphold the proposed action?

If the Corporation's reviewing official concludes that the proposed action, in full or in part, should still be implemented, you will have an opportunity to request an additional proceeding. A Corporation program director or designee will conduct a review of the complete record, including such additional relevant documents you submit. If deemed appropriate, such as where there are material facts in genuine dispute, the program director or designee may conduct a telephonic or in person meeting. If a meeting is conducted, it will be recorded and you will be provided a copy of the recording. The program director or designee will issue a decision within 30 days of the conclusion of the review of the record or meeting. The decision of the program director or designee is final and cannot be appealed further within the agency.
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

S. RES 

NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO

TREATY

DOC NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

MARINE CORPS 

74 199-2 The following named officers for appointment in 

the United States Marine Corps to the grade 

indicated under title 10, U.S.C., section 624: 

Mar 28, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Major General 

 Brig. Gen. John F. Kelly, 

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

* 117 307 Joseph Timothy Kelliher, of the District of 

Columbia, to be a Member of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission for the term 

expiring June 30, 2012. (Reappointment) 

May 23, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Bingaman, Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON 

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY 

* 152 46 Charles Darwin Snelling, of Pennsylvania, to be a 

Member of the Board of Directors of the 

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 

for a term expiring May 30, 2012. 

(Reappointment) 

May 24, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Inouye, Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 161 412 Michael G. Vickers, of California, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of Defense, vice Thomas W. 

O'Connell. 

Jun 26, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 162 578 Thomas P. D'Agostino, of Maryland, to be Under 

Secretary for Nuclear Security, Department of 

Energy, vice Linton F. Brooks, resigned. 

Jun 26, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 163 601 Preston M. Geren, of Texas, to be Secretary of the 

Army, vice Francis J. Harvey, resigned. 

Jun 26, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

4

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR 

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

* 206 73 James R. Kunder, of Virginia, to be Deputy 

Administrator of the United States Agency for 

International Development, vice Frederick W. 

Schieck. 

Jun 27, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Biden, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

5

COAST GUARD 

PN581 COAST GUARD nomination of Jason D. Rimington, which was received by the Senate and appeared 

in the Congressional Record of May 21, 2007. 

PN582 COAST GUARD nomination of Jeffery J. Rasnake, which was received by the Senate and appeared 

in the Congressional Record of May 21, 2007.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 110 (Monday, June 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 32923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13337]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DoD-2013-OS-0198]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, 
the following proposal for collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by July 9, 
2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Licari, 571-372-0493.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Computer Aided Dispatch and 
Record Management System (CAD/RMS); OMB Control Number 0704-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 693.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 693.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 231.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain information regarding incidents that occur at the Pentagon 
and other facilities under the jurisdiction of the Pentagon Force 
Protection Agency.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: June 4, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-13337 Filed 6-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
§ 1610.3 Other requirements on recipients' funds. The following requirements apply to non-LSC funds as provided in the referenced regulations. This part neither expands nor limits those requirements. ( a ) Client identity and statement of facts—45 CFR part 1636.
( b ) Disclosure of case information—45 CFR part 1644.
( c ) Priorities for the provision of services—45 CFR part 1620.
( d ) Timekeeping—45 CFR part 1635.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Tn the Matter of )
)
Proposed Final Audit Report on Jill Stein)
for President
CERTIFICATION

I, Laura E. Sinram, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election
Commission, do hereby certify that on April 16, 2019, the Commission decided
by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Jill Stein for
President, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance
Officer and the Audit Division dated April 11, 2019.

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted

affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:

UW AW|a Jewa C (arg
Date Laura E. Sinram
Deputy Secretary of the Commission
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

REPRESENTATIVE TED LIEU, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 16-2201 (EGS)

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) NOTICE OF FILING

)

Defendant. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S 

NOTICE OF FILING OF CERTIFIED LIST OF CONTENTS OF THE 

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IN MATTER UNDER REVIEW 7101

The Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) provides notice of the filing of the 

Commission’s Certified List of Contents of the Administrative Record in Matter Under Review 

7101. See LCvR 7(n)(1).

Respectfully submitted,

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628)

Acting General Counsel

lstevenson@fec.gov

/s/Jacob S. Siler 

Jacob S. Siler (D.C. Bar No. 1003383)

Attorney

jsiler@fec.gov

Kevin Deeley

Associate General Counsel

kdeeley@fec.gov

Sana Chaudhry

Attorney

schaudhry@fec.gov

Harry J. Summers

Assistant General Counsel

hsummers@fec.gov

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1050 First Street NE

Washington, DC 20463

(202) 694-1650

May 7, 2018

Case 1:16-cv-02201-EGS Document 40 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 1
#### CLARK *v.*THE STATE.

The trial judge having, in his instructions to the jury, expressed an opinion upon evidence submitted to the jury, the refusal of a new trial upon the grounds complaining of such charge was error.

Submitted May 22,

Decided July 27, 1906.

Accusation of violating local option liquor law. Before Judge Clements. City court of Eastman. April 31, 1906.

*W. M. Morrison*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles W. Griffin, solicitor,*contra.

Beck, J.

The defendant was tried upon an accusation charging him with a violation of the local option law of Dodge county. The sole witness for the State was one Kytle, the marshal of Chauncey, who testified, that he saw the defendant sell to a negro [naming him] twenty-five cents worth of whisky; that he was looking through a crack, and saw defendant give the purchaser the whisky, .and the purchaser give to the defendant twenty-five cents; that he did not arrest the defendant until the 37th of February, which was ten days after the date of the sale.” From the testimony of the witness and the statement of the defendant the jury would have been authorized to find that the feelings of the witness towards the accused were decidedly unfriendly; but the jury believed the evidence of the witness and found the defendant guilty. He made ,a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he excepted. Besides the usual and general grounds, there was one ground of the motion which assigned error upon the following portion of the .judge’s charge: “I further charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that if the evidence shows that some time had elapsed from the time ■of the alleged sale up to the time of the arrest, that would cut no figure in the case, and you are not to consider it. The sole question for [you] to consider is the guilt or innocence of the defendant under the evidence.” This was excepted to on the ground that it was an expression of opinion by the judge upon the facts of the case, and that it had the effect “to ¡withdraw from the jury evidence that was material’ to the defendant.”

*80The exception seems to he well taken. While it might be true that if the guilt of the defendant were not in controversy, the period of time which elapsed from the date of the commission of the crime to the time of arrest would be immaterial, inasmuch as the question for the jury to pass upon was whether or not they would believe the sole witness for the State, who, according to his own testimony, saw the commission of the crime and waited ten days before arresting the accused, the motives which actuated him, and the state of his feelings towards the defendant, all being under consideration, it could not be held as a matter of law that the delay in making the arrest was wholly immaterial, and it was error *for the judge to express an opinion upon that part of the evidence relating to the delay and to withdraw the evidence touching it from the consideration of the jury. And the error was of such a nature as to require the grant of a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except*Fish, *O. J.„ absent.*
#### § 601.9 Access by historical researchers and former Presidential appointees.

The requirement in § 601.8 that access to classified information may be granted only as is essential to the accomplishment of lawful and authorized Government purposes may be waived for persons who are engaged in historical research projects, or previously have occupied policymaking positions to which they were appointed by the President, provided they execute written agreements to safeguard the information and written consent to the Foundation's review of their notes and manuscripts solely for the purpose of determining that no classified information is disclosed. A precondition to any such access is the favorable completion of an appropriate investigative inquiry.
§ 286.170 How may a Tribe petition for administrative review of disapproval of a TFAP or amendment? ( a ) If, after a Tribe has been provided the opportunity to make revisions to its TFAP or amendment, the Secretary determines that the TFAP or amendment cannot be approved, a written Notice of Disapproval will be sent to the Tribe. The Notice of Disapproval will indicate the specific grounds for disapproval.
( b ) A Tribe may request reconsideration of a disapproval determination by filing a written Request for Reconsideration to the Secretary within 60 days of receipt of the Notice of Disapproval. If reconsideration is not requested, the disapproval is final and the procedures under paragraph (f) of this section must be followed. ( 1 ) The Request for Reconsideration must include— ( i ) All documentation that the Tribe believes is relevant and supportive of its TFAP or amendment; and
( ii ) A written response to each ground for disapproval identified in the Notice of Disapproval indicating why the Tribe believes that its TFAP or amendment conforms to the statutory and regulatory requirements for approval.
( c ) Within 30 days after receipt of a Request for Reconsideration, the Secretary or designee will notify the Tribe of the date and time a hearing for the purpose of reconsideration of the Notice of Disapproval will be held. Such a hearing may be conducted by telephone conference call.
( d ) A hearing conducted under § 286.170(c) must be held not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days after the date of the notice of such hearing is furnished to the Tribe, unless the Tribe agrees in writing to an extension.
( e ) The Secretary or designee will make a written determination affirming, modifying, or reversing disapproval of the TFAP or amendment within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing.
( f ) If a TFAP or amendment is disapproved, the Tribe may appeal this final written decision to the Departmental Appeals Board (the Board) within 30 days after such party receives notice of determination. The party's appeal to the Board should follow the provisions of the rules under this section and those at 45 CFR part 16, where applicable.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM HAR04 2015 

TO; 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Oificer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Danita C. Alberico 

Attorney 

LH" l»y 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report Kevin McCarthy for Congress (LRA 979) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR") 

on Kevin McCarthy for Congress. The DFAR contains two findings: 1) Receipt of Contributions 

in Excess of the Limit; and, 2) Misstatement of Financial Activity. We concur with the findings, 

if you have any questions, please contact Danita C. Alberico, the attorney assigned to this audit.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 00-5337 September Term, 2000

00cv01775

Filed On: September 29, 2000

[547029]

Patrick J. Buchanan, et al.,

Appellants

 v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

BEFORE: Ginsburg, Tatel, and Garland, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for leave to participate as amicus curiae, and the

briefs filed by the parties, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to participate as amicus curiae be granted. 

The Clerk is directed to file the lodged amicus brief. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that with respect to the single issue presented in

appellants' brief for expedited consideration (whether the fifteen percent electoral support

requirement is illegal to the extent it excludes a candidate who has qualified for general

election federal campaign funding) the district court's order filed September 14, 2000, be

affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until resolution of

the remainder of the appeal.

Per Curiam

USCA Case #00-5337 Document #547029 Filed: 09/29/2000 Page 1 of 1