alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsCable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations During Fire (CHRISTIFIRE) (NUREG/CR-7

# Cable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations During Fire (CHRISTIFIRE), Phase 1: Horizontal Trays (NUREG/CR-7010, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7010, Volume 1 (PDF - 32.79 MB)

For information about how the NRC handles your comments, see our Privacy Policy.

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2011**Date Published:** July 2012

**Prepared by:** Kevin McGrattan Andrew Lock Nathan Marsh Marc Nyden Scott Bareham Michael Price (Summer Undergraduate Research Fellow)

National Institute of Standards and Technology Building and Fire Research Laboratory Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8663

Alexander B. Morgan Mary Galaska Kathy Schenck

University of Dayton Research Institute Multi-Scale Composites and Polymers Division Dayton, OH 45469-0160

David Stroup, NRC Project Manager

 NRC Job Code N6549

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the first phase of a multi-year NRC research initiative entitled CHRISTIFIRE (**C**able **H**eat **R**elease,**I**gnition, and **S**pread in **T**ray **I**nstallations during **FIRE**). The overall goal of the program is to better understand and quantify the burning characteristics of grouped electrical cables commonly found in nuclear power plants. The first phase of the program focuses on horizontal tray configurations. The experiments conducted range from micro-scale, in which very small (5 mg) samples of cable materials were burned in a calorimeter to determine their heat of combustion and other properties; to full-scale, in which horizontal arrays of ladder-back trays loaded with varying amounts of cable were burned under a large oxygen-depletion calorimeter. Additional experiments include cone calorimetry, smoke and effluent characterization in a small test furnace, and intermediate-scale calorimetry involving a single tray of heated cables exposed to a bank of radiant panels. The results of the small-scale experiments will serve as input data for fire models; while the results of the full-scale experiments will serve as validation data for the models.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-46 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Office and Professional Employees 

Intemational Union - Voice of the 

Electorate (A09-29) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify tfaat on Februaiy 24,2011, tfae Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0. to approve tfae Proposed Final Audit Report on tfae 

Office and Professional Employees Intemational Union - Voice of the 

Electorate, as recommended in the Memorandum fiom tfae Cfaief Compliance 

Officer and the Audit Division dated February 16,2011. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

/Date Shawn Woodhead Werth / 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Exhibit 31.2
 RENTECH, INC.
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Rentech, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    [Intentionally Omitted];4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluations; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Dated: January 28, 2010
    /s/ Dan J. CohrsDan J. CohrsChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60791 

Conference Calendar

 

WILLIE R. EVANS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ROGER COOK, Superintendent,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96-CV-73-GG

--------------------

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Willie R. Evans, Mississippi prisoner # 72565A, requests a

certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Because Evans’

petition was filed prior to the effective date of the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, his motion is

construed as a request for a certificate of probable cause (CPC). 

Evans also requests appointment of counsel and permission to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). 
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) (West 1997)

requires the notice of appeal in a civil action to be filed

within 30 days of the entry of a final judgment. A timely notice

of appeal is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by

this court. United States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 961 (5th Cir.

1998); United States v. Winn, 948 F.2d 145, 153 (5th Cir. 1991). 

Evans did not file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the

entry of the district court’s final judgment. The last day for

filing a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his § 2254

petition was June 30, 1997. Therefore, Evans’ appeal is

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and his motions for

permission to proceed IFP, appointment of counsel, and CPC are

DENIED AS MOOT. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT.
§ 1327.1 General requirements. ( a ) All projects funded under this part must be of national significance and serve or relate to individuals with developmental disabilities to comply with subtitle E of the Act, sections 161-163 (42 U.S.C. 15081-15083).
( b ) In general, Projects of National Significance (PNS) provide technical assistance, collect data, demonstrate exemplary and innovative models, disseminate knowledge at the local and national levels, and otherwise meet the goals of Projects of National Significance section 161 (42 U.S.C. 15081).
( c ) Projects of National Significance may engage in one or more of the types of activities provided in section 161(2) of the Act.
( d ) In general, eligible applicants for PNS funding are public and private non-profit entities, 42 U.S.C. 15082, such as institutions of higher learning, State and local governments, and Tribal governments. The program announcements will specifically state any further eligibility requirements for the priority areas in the fiscal year.
( e ) Faith-based organizations are eligible to apply for PNS funding, providing that the faith-based organizations meet the specific eligibility criteria contained in the program announcement for the fiscal year.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 14003          Scale: 1,532,210          Edition: 6          Edition Date: 27-APR-96          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1996/32**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-626.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of Understanding between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MONGOLIA 

Signed at Reston and Ulaanbaatar 

April 2 and June 26, 2003 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MONGOLIA 

Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Reston and Ulaanbaatar April 2 and June 26, 2003; 

 Entered into force June 26, 2003. 

 With annexes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,005
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,993
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         36,093
<ALLOWANCE>                                        560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,597
<DEPOSITS>                                      43,144
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,328
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,325
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  51,597
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    689
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   29
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   126
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   844
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 430
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              414
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (404)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (404)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.95
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               560
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0





</TABLE>
#### Wenzel v. Miller, appellant.

*Evidence—declarations of mortgagee—when admissible against subsequent holder of mortgage.*

In an action to set aside a mortgage as usurious, *held,*that it is not altogether clear but that what a mortgagee declares in the presence of the mortgagor, at the time of the execution of the instrument, touching the consideration, may be admissible in evidence even against a subsequent holder, ás part of the *res gestee.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought in Kings county by *681John Wenzel and wife against Christopher Miller and another, to set aside a bond and a mortgage on the ground of usury.

*Hatch & Bemville,*for appellants.

*Tracy, Gatlin & Brgdhead,*for respondents.

Talcott, J.

The finding of the referee that the mortgage was usurious was upheld upon the ground that there was evidence sufficient to sustain the finding. The head-note states all that is material for publication in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 62 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 62

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Animal and Plant 
Health Inspection Service relating to ``Importation of Fresh Beef From 
                              Paraguay''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2024

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Rounds) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Animal and Plant 
Health Inspection Service relating to ``Importation of Fresh Beef From 
                              Paraguay''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
relating to ``Importation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay'' (88 Fed. Reg. 
77883 (November 14, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1656 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1656

 To require TARP payments to be conditioned on the top 10 highest wage 
  earners at a company having repaid any bonuses received during the 
                        previous 5 fiscal years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

 Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, and Mr. Duncan) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require TARP payments to be conditioned on the top 10 highest wage 
  earners at a company having repaid any bonuses received during the 
                        previous 5 fiscal years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assisted Institution Bonus Repayment 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. BONUS REPAYMENT REQUIRED FOR TARP ASSISTANCE.

    Section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5221) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Bonus Repayment Requirement.--Effective as of the date of the 
enactment of the Assisted Institution Bonus Repayment Act of 2009, a 
financial institution shall, prior to receiving assistance under this 
title, certify to the Secretary that the 10 most highly paid executives 
or employees of the institution have repaid to the institution any 
bonuses (as such term is defined by the Secretary) received from the 
institution by such executives or employees during the previous 5 
fiscal years.''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary OfTransportation SUBJECT: Notice ofCommunication in Docket: FROM: TO: FAA-2015-3491 Secretary Anthony R. Foxx,@ ChiefofDockets 

# Memorandum

DATE: November 24 2015 

### '

On September 18,2015, during a telephone conversation with U.S.· Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), the Senator raised the subject ofair service between Lansing Capital Region International Airport (LAN) and Ronald Reagan WashingtonNational Airport (DCA). Senator Stabenow expressed support for the continuation ofthis service given its importance to the community. I informed Senator Stabenowthat I could not comment on the merits because the matter was under active consideration by the Federal Aviation Administration. Please place this memorandum inthe appropriate Docket. cc: U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)