alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2105.45 How will the Agency notify you if it denies your fee waiver request? If the Agency denies your request for a fee waiver, it will notify you, in writing, of the following: ( a ) The basis for the denial, including a full explanation of why the fee waiver request does not meet the Agency's fee waiver criteria in § 2105.46;
( b ) The name and title or position of each person responsible for the denial;
( c ) The name and title of legal counsel consulted;
( d ) Advisement of the right to seek dispute resolution services from the Agency's FOIA Public Liaison and the Office of Government Information Services (OIGS);
( e ) Your right to appeal the denial under subpart H of this part and a description of the requirements set forth therein, within 30 workdays from the date of the fee waiver denial letter; and
( f ) Your anticipated fees, in accordance with § 2105.47.
§ 1302.22 Home-based option. ( a ) *Setting.* The home-based option delivers the full range of services, consistent with § 1302.20(b), through visits with the child's parents, primarily in the child's home and through group socialization opportunities in a Head Start classroom, community facility, home, or on field trips. For Early Head Start programs, the home-based option may be used to deliver services to some or all of a program's enrolled children. For Head Start Preschool programs, the home-based option may only be used to deliver services to a portion of a program's enrolled children.
( b ) *Caseload.* A program that implements a home-based option must maintain an average caseload of 10 to 12 families per home visitor with a maximum of 12 families for any individual home visitor.
( c ) *Service duration* — ( 1 ) *Early Head Start.* By August 1, 2017, an Early Head Start home-based program must: ( i ) Provide one home visit per week per family that lasts at least an hour and a half and provide a minimum of 46 visits per year; and,
( ii ) Provide, at a minimum, 22 group socialization activities distributed over the course of the program year.
( 2 ) *Head Start Preschool.* A Head Start Preschool home-based program must: ( i ) Provide one home visit per week per family that lasts at least an hour and a half and provide a minimum of 32 visits per year; and,
( ii ) Provide, at a minimum, 16 group socialization activities distributed over the course of the program year.
( 3 ) *Meeting minimum requirements.* A program that implements a home-based option must: ( i ) Make up planned home visits or scheduled group socialization activities that were canceled by the program, and to the extent possible attempt to make up planned home visits canceled by the family, when this is necessary to meet the minimums described in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section; and,
( ii ) Not replace home visits or scheduled group socialization activities for medical or social service appointments for the purposes of meeting the minimum requirements described in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.
( d ) *Safety requirements.* The areas for learning, playing, sleeping, toileting, preparing food, and eating in facilities used for group socializations in the home-based option must meet the safety standards described in § 1302.47(1)(ii) through (viii).
[81 FR 61412, Sept. 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 67809, Aug. 21, 2024]
§ 286.135 What information on penalties against individuals must be included in a Tribal Family Assistance Plan? ( a ) The TFAP must include the Tribe's proposal for penalties against individuals who refuse to engage in work activities. The Tribe's proposal must address the following: ( 1 ) Will the Tribe impose a pro rata reduction, or more at Tribal option, or will it terminate assistance to a family?
( 2 ) After consideration of the provision specified at § 286.150, what will be the proposed Tribal policies related to a single custodial parent, with a child under the age of 6, who refuses to engage in work activities because of a demonstrated inability to obtain needed child care?
( 3 ) What good cause exceptions, if any, does the Tribe propose that will allow individuals to avoid penalties for failure to engage in work?
( 4 ) What other rules governing penalties does the Tribe propose?
( 5 ) What, if any, will be the Tribe's policies related to victims of domestic violence consistent with § 286.140?
( b ) The Tribe's rationale for its proposal must also be included in the TFAP. ( 1 ) The rationale must address how the proposed penalties against individuals are consistent with the purposes of TANF, consistent with the economic conditions and resources of the Tribe, and how they relate to the requirements of section 407(e) of the Act.
( 2 ) Examples of the information that could be included to illustrate the Tribe's proposal include, but are not limited to; poverty, unemployment, jobless and job surplus rates; education levels of adults in the service area; availability of and/or accessibility to resources (educational facilities, transportation) to help families become employable and find employment; and employment opportunities on and near the service area.
( c ) We may require a Tribe to submit additional information about the rationale before we approve the proposed penalties against individuals.
§ 1641.9 Response to notice of proposed debarment. ( a ) The IPA shall have 30 days from receipt of the notice within which to respond.
( b ) The response shall be in writing and may include information and argument in opposition to the proposed debarment, including any additional specific information pertaining to the possible causes for debarment, and information and argument in mitigation of the proposed period of debarment.
( c ) The response may request a meeting with the debarring official to permit the IPA to discuss issues of fact or law relating to the proposed debarment, or to otherwise resolve the pending matters. Any such meeting shall take the form that the debarring official deems appropriate and shall be held within 20 days of the response. If the IPA requests an in person meeting, it shall be held at LSC headquarters.
( d ) Failure to respond to the notice shall be deemed an admission of the existence of the cause(s) for debarment set forth in the notice and an acceptance of the period of debarment. In such circumstances, without further proceedings, the debarring official may enter a final decision stating the period of debarment.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Amendment No.1 to Form 10-K of Jade Art
Group Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Huacai Song, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 9, 2010


/s/
      Huacai SongHuacai
      Song, Principal Executive
Officer
Cheshire,

No. 5322.

#### Marianne P. Sawtelle *v.*Homer J. Sawtelle.

Argued March 3, 1965.

Decided May 24, 1965.

*Faulkner, Plaut, Hanna*& *Zimmerman*for the plaintiff, filed no brief.

*Homer J. Sawtelle*(by brief and orally), pro se.

Lampron, J.

These hearings involved motions filed by the defendant seeking modifications of a divorce decree entered in favor of the plaintiff on April 19, 1963. *Sawtelle*v. *Sawtelle,*105 N. H. 177. As part of the first of tire hearings on these motions, held September 24, 1964, the Trial Court made available to both parties a portion of the transcript of certain evidence concerning the identification of personal property involved therein. After the Court’s decree on October 5, 1964, the defendant filed motions for modification which were heard on October 28, 1964, and denied.

The defendant filed a motion that the full transcripts of the *305above hearings be filed with the clerk of court under the provisions of RSA 519:28. On his refusal to pay the cost of these transcripts in the amount of $46.20, defendant’s motion was denied.

RSA 519:28 provides as follows: “Transcripts after trial. A court stenographer shall make for the use of the court and parties, after any trial, whenever ordered by the court, a true report of all proceedings, and the court may order the original notes to be filed. Upon request of either party, the original stenographic notes, and a duly certified copy of them written out in full, shall, as soon as practicable, be placed on file.”

RSA 519:30 provides in part as follows: “Fees for transcripts. The court, acting as a body, shall fix a schedule of prices for transcripts and for extra copies furnished to counsel or parties.”

A “duly certified copy” of “the original stenographic notes” (RSA 519:28) is a transcript of those proceedings within the term “transcripts” in RSA 519:30. There is no contention that the price fixed for the transcripts requested by the defendant was not in accordance with “a schedule of prices” fixed under RSA 519:30. The Court properly denied defendant’s request for transcripts when he refused to pay the amount of $46.20 estimated as the cost of the requested transcriptions of the original stenographic notes of these hearings.

Although defendant talks of a resulting denial of his constitutional rights, the record will not support a claim that he is prevented from appealing a substantial issue of law by reason of poverty. See *Hardy*v. *United States,*375 U. S. 277.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
§ 2554.14 What happens if a defendant fails to file an answer? ( a ) If a defendant does not file any answer within 30 days after service of the complaint, the reviewing official will refer the complaint to the ALJ.
( b ) Once the complaint is referred, the ALJ will promptly serve on the defendant a notice that an initial decision will be issued.
( c ) The ALJ will assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true and, if such facts establish liability under the statute, the ALJ will issue an initial decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under the statute.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, when a defendant fails to file a timely answer, the defendant waives any right to further review of the penalties and assessments imposed in the initial decision.
( e ) The initial decision becomes final 30 days after it is issued.
( f ) If, at any time before an initial decision becomes final, a defendant files a motion with the ALJ asking that the case be reopened and describing the extraordinary circumstances that prevented the defendant from filing an answer, the initial decision will be stayed until the ALJ makes a decision on the motion. The reviewing official may respond to the motion.
( g ) If, in his motion to reopen, a defendant demonstrates extraordinary circumstances excusing his failure to file a timely answer, the ALJ will withdraw the initial decision, and grant the defendant an opportunity to answer the complaint.
( h ) A decision by the ALJ to deny a defendant's motion to reopen a case is not subject to review or reconsideration.
( i ) The defendant may appeal to the authority head the decision denying a motion to reopen by filing a notice of appeal with the authority head within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal shall stay the initial decision until the authority head decides the issue.
( j ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the authority head, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( k ) The authority head shall decide expeditiously whether extraordinary circumstances excuse the defendant's failure to file a timely answer based solely on the record before the ALJ.
( l ) If the authority head decides that extraordinary circumstances excused the defendant's failure to file a timely answer, the authority head shall remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant the defendant an opportunity to answer.
( m ) If the authority head decides that the defendant's failure to file a timely answer is not excused, the authority head shall reinstate the initial decision of the ALJ, which shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the authority head issues such decision.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00550

- CV

The Harris County Appraisal Review Board v. Cyngita Properties Inc

On Appeal from the 269th District Court of Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 79583

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APP EALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 2 9 , 2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7067
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE ROE MATTHEWS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-382, CA-95-432-3-17) Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.George Roe Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Matthews , Nos. CR-91-382; CA-95-432-3-17 (D.S.C. June 14, 1995). In addition, we find sufficient evidence supports Matthews' 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction under the "carry" prong and that, therefore, Bailey v. United States , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (No. 94-7448), does not invalidate the conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIRST CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1989 

Adjourned November 22, 1989 

Convened January 23, 1990 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, July 12, 1990 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J.STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
Calendar 

No. 

11 

Calendar 

No. 

* 386 

* 389 

Treaty 

Doc. No. 

EX. B., 

95-1 

Message 

No. 

576 

771 

1 

TREATIES 

Subject 

Two Related Protocols to the Convention for 

the Unification of Certain Rules Relating 

to International Carriage by Air, as 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 

3 and 4). 

NO MIN A TIO NS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 

Clifford R. Oviatt, Jr., of Virginia, to be 

a Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the remainder of the term 

expiring August 27, 1993, vice Wilford W. 

Johansen, resigned. 

Dennis M. Devaney, of Maryland, to be a 

Member of the National Labor Relations 

Board for the term of five years expiring 

December 16, 1994. (Reappointment) 

Reported 

Bv 

Jun 28 90 Reported 

favorably with certain 

conditions, by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

(Printed report--Ex. Rept. 

101-21 together with 

minority views). 

Reported 

Bv 

Oct 4, 89 Mr. Kennedy, 

Committee on Labor and 

Human Resources, without 

printed report. 

Do. 
2 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. By 

THE JUDICIARY 

816 768 Hart T. Mankin, of Delaware, to be an Jun 19, 90 Mr. Cranston, 

Associate Judge of the United States Court Committee on Veterans 

of Veterans Appeals for the term of Affairs, without printed 

fifteen years. (New Position - P.L. report. 

100-687) 

817 949 Ronald M. Holdaway, of Wyoming, to be an Do. 

Associate Judge of the United States Court 

of Veterans Appeals for the term of 

fifteen years. (New Position) 

818 1060 Donald L. Ivers, of New Mexico, to be an Do. 

Associate Judge of the United States Court 

of Veterans Appeals for the term of 

fifteen years. (New Position) 

819 1273 Jonathan R. Steinberg, of Maryland, to be Do. 

an Associate Judge of the United States 

Court of Veterans Appeals for the term of 

fifteen years. (New Position) 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

* 875 1272 James Wilson Holsinger, Jr., of Virginia, Jun 28, 90 Mr. Cranston, 

to be Chief Medical Director. Department Committee on Veterans 

of Veterans Affairs, for a term of four Affairs, without printed 

years. (New Position) report. 

PANAMA CANAL COMMISSION 

* 876 1243 Gilberto Guardia Fabrega, a citizen of the Jun 28, 90 Mr. Nunn, 

Republic of Panama, to be Administrator of Committee on Armed 

the Panama Canal Commission, vice Dennis Services, with printed 

P. McAuliff e. reoort - Ex.Reot. 101-22. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
#### § 60.4 How information must be reported.

Information must be reported to the NPDB as required under §§ 60.7, 60.8, 60.9, 60.10, 60.11, 60.12, 60.13, 60.14, 60.15 and 60.16 in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe.
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 75727 

[FR Doc. 06–9743 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 07–03] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 

601–3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 07–03 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and sensitivity of technology. 

Dated: December 11, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.009</GPH>
75728 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.010</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 75729 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.011</GPH>
75730 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.012</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 75731 

[FR Doc. 06–9744 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 07–07] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 

601–3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 07–07 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification. 

Dated: December 11, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.013</GPH>
§ 660.9 How does the Director receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Director follows the procedures in § 660.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all Federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 660.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Foundation.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Foundation. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Foundation by the single point of contact, the Director follows the procedures of § 660.10 of this part.
( e ) The Director considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Director is not required to apply the procedures of § 660.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the Foundation by a commenting party.
#### §§ 1356.65-1356.66 [Reserved]