SENATOR MITCH McCONNELL, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF

AMERICA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

EMILY ECHOLS, a minor child, by and through

her next friends, TIM AND WINDY ECHOLS, et

al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civ. No. 02-582 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-581 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-633 (CKK, KLH, RJL)
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED

STATES, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF

BROADCASTERS, 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND

CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL

ORGANIZATIONS, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

Civ. No. 02-751 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-753 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-754 (CKK, KLH, RJL)
CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, 

et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al.

 Defendants.

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., 

 Defendants.

Civ. No. 02-781 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-874 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-875 (CKK, KLH, RJL)
4

VICTORIA JACKSON GRAY ADAMS, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al.,

 Defendants.

REPRESENTATIVE BENNIE G. THOMPSON, 

et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al.,

 Defendants.

Civ. No. 02-877 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

Civ. No. 02-881 (CKK, KLH, RJL)

FINAL JUDGMENT

(May 1, 2003)

Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the four opinions of the

three-judge District Court hearing these eleven consolidated actions, it is this 1st day of May, 2003,

hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment [#206] is GRANTED IN PART and

DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that Defendants’ and Intervenors’ Motion for Judgment [#204] is GRANTED

IN PART and DENIED IN PART; it is further
5

ORDEREDthat in regard to Section 101 of BCRA, judgment for Plaintiffs is entered in part

with regard to new FECA Sections 323(a) and 323(b) and judgment for Defendants is entered in part

with regard to new FECA Sections 323(a) and 323(b), in accordance with Judge Leon’s

Memorandum Opinion. Section 323(a) is constitutional only to the extent it bans national party

committees from using nonfederal funds for Section 301(20)(A)(iii) activities and Section 323(b)

is constitutional only as applied to Section 301(20)(A)(iii) activities; it is further

ORDERED that in regard to Section 101 of BCRA, judgment for Plaintiffs is entered with

regard to new FECA Section 323(d); it is further

ORDEREDthat in regard to Section 101 of BCRA, judgment for Defendants is entered with

regard to new FECA Sections 323(e) and 323(f); it is further

ORDERED that in regard to Section 201 (challenged disclosure provisions only), with the

exception of subsection (5), and in regard to Sections 202, 214(a), 214(d), and 311 of BCRA,

judgment for Defendants is entered in accordance with the per curiam opinion; it is further

ORDEREDthat in regard to subsection (5) of Section 201, judgment for Plaintiffs is entered

in accordance with the per curiam opinion; it is further

ORDEREDthat in regardto Sections 214(b), 214(c), and 212, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED

on justiciability grounds in accordance with the per curiam opinion; it is further

ORDERED that in regard to Section 203 of BCRA, judgment is entered for Defendants with

regard to that provision’s applicability to the backup definition of “electioneering communication”

as defined in Section 201 of BCRA, in accordance with Judge Leon’s Memorandum Opinion; it is

further 

ORDERED that in regard to Section 204 of BCRA, judgment is entered for Defendants in
6

accordance with Judge Leon’s Memorandum Opinion; it is further

ORDEREDthat Judgment for Plaintiffs is entered with regard to Sections 213, 318, and 504

of BCRA; it is further

ORDERED that in regard to Sections 304, 316, 319, 305, and 307, Plaintiffs’ motion is

DENIED on justiciability grounds; it is further

ORDERED that Defendants and their agents are permanently enjoined from enforcing,

executing or otherwise applying those sections of BCRA found unconstitutional by this three-judge

District Court.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON

United States Circuit Judge

 /s/ 

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge

/s/ 

RICHARD J. LEON

United States District Judge