alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T
MAR I A C HR I S T I NA GA R Z ON S A A V E D R O , a . k. a . M ar i aC r i s t i naG ar z on S a a ve dr a , a . k. a . M ar i aG ar z on- S a a ve dr o, a . k. a . M ar i aC r i s t i naG ar z on- S a a ve dr o, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73416 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 811- 187 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ar i a C hri st i na G ar zon-S aavedro, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C ol om bi a, pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73416 2 di s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f

r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s r e m ova l or de r . W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . In h ero p en in g b rief

, G ar zo n -S aa v ed ro w aiv ed an y c h allen g e to th e B IA ’s d is p o s itiv e d e te rm in atio n th a t h e rap p e a l w a s u n tim e ly . See M art i nez- Serran o v. I NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s tha tar e nots pe c i f i c a l l yr a i s e d and ar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1516 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 199
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1516

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 4, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, as the ``Sergeant Marcus 
                         Mathes Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT MARCUS MATHES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Marcus Mathes Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 199

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1516

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, as the ``Sergeant Marcus 
                         Mathes Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
§ 2553.43 What cost reimbursements and benefits may sponsors provide to RSVP volunteers? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) RSVP volunteers may be provided the following cost reimbursements within the limits of the project's available resources: ( 1 ) *Transportation.* RSVP volunteers may receive assistance with the cost of transportation to and from volunteer assignments and official project activities, including orientation, training, and recognition events.
( 2 ) *Meals.* RSVP volunteers may receive assistance with the cost of meals taken while on assignment.
( 3 ) *Other volunteer expenses.* RSVP volunteers may also be reimbursed for allowable out-of-pocket expenses incurred while performing their assignments.
( b ) RSVP volunteers must be provided the following cost reimbursements: ( 1 ) *Recognition.* RSVP volunteers shall be provided recognition for their service.
( 2 ) *Insurance.* An RSVP volunteer is provided with the CNCS-specified minimum levels of insurance as follows: ( i ) *Accident insurance.* Accident insurance covers RSVP volunteers for personal injury during travel between their homes and places of assignment, during volunteer service, during meal periods while serving as a volunteer, and while attending project sponsored activities. Protection shall be provided against claims in excess of any benefits or services for medical care or treatment available to the volunteer from other sources.
( ii ) *Personal liability insurance.* Protection is provided against claims in excess of protection provided by other insurance. It does not include professional liability coverage.
( iii ) *Excess automobile insurance.* ( A ) RSVP drivers who drive in connection with their service shall be provided protection against claims in excess of the greater of either: ( 1 ) Liability insurance the volunteers carry on their own automobiles; or
( 2 ) The limits of applicable state financial responsibility law, or in its absence, levels of protection to be determined by CNCS for each person, each accident, and for property damage.
( B ) RSVP volunteers who drive their personal vehicles to or on assignments or project-related activities shall maintain personal automobile liability insurance equal to or exceeding the levels established by CNCS.
[83 FR 64655, Dec. 17, 2018]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2017

s0620 

# Order

Clerk June 23, 2017

155905

SC: 155905

In re M. M. GIDLEY, Minor. COA: 335642

Oakland CC Family Division:

2015

- 836720

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions present ed should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 505.2 Persons under legal disability. ( a ) Claims may be submitted on behalf of persons who, being otherwise eligible to make claims under the provisions of sections 5(i) and 6(f), are incompetent or otherwise under any legal disability, by the natural or legal guardian, committee, conservator, curator, or any other person, including the spouse of the claimant, whom the Commission determines is charged with the care of the claimant.
( b ) Upon the death of any individual for whom an award has been made, the Commission may consider the initial application filed by or in behalf of the decedent as a formal claim for the purpose of reissuing the award to the next eligible survivor in the order of preference as set forth under sections 5(i) and 6(d)(4) of the Act.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40918 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAYMUNDO RAMOS

- GARCIA, also known as Raymondo Ramos Garcia, also known as Raymundo Ramos Garcia, also known as Raymundo RamosGarcia, also known as Dimundo Romos , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:19

- CR

- 799

- 1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymundo Ramos

Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos

- Garcia h a s not filed a response. He did, however, execute a waiver of a ny challenge to his conviction; accordingly, we

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 15, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40918 Document: 00515383224 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2020No. 19

- 40918

2 conclude that his conviction is not before us and will not address it further. See United States v. Polanco

- Ozorto , 772 F.3d 1053 , 1055 (5 th Cir. 2014) (“Accordingly, we will not address the issues raised in Polanco

- Ozorto’s response [to his attorney’s Anders brief] related to his plea and conviction.”); United States v. Garcia , 483 F.3d 289, 290

- 91 (5th Cir. 2007). With respect to his sentence, he has been released from incarceration and has no term of

super vised release such that any challenge to his sentence is moot, see Spencer
v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein . The APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. Case: 19-40918 Document: 00515383224 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2020
§ 286.215 When are the TANF penalty provisions applicable? ( a ) A Tribe may be subject to penalties, as described in § 286.195(a)(1), § 286.195(a)(2) and § 286.195(a)(4), for conduct occurring on and after the first day of implementation of the Tribe's TANF program.
( b ) A Tribe may be subject to penalties, as described in § 286.195(a)(3), for conduct occurring on and after the date that is six months after the Tribe begins operating the TANF program.
( c ) We will not apply the regulations retroactively. We will judge Tribal actions that occurred prior to the effective date of these rules and expenditures of funds received prior to the effective date only against a reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions in title IV-A of the Act. ( 1 ) To the extent that a Tribe's failure to meet the requirements of the penalty provisions is attributable to the absence of Federal rules or guidance, Tribes may qualify for reasonable cause, as discussed in § 286.225.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
§ 400.155 Other services. A State may provide the following other services— ( a ) *Information and referral services.*
( b ) *Outreach services,* including activities designed to familiarize refugees with available services, to explain the purpose of these services, and facilitate access to these services.
( c ) *Social adjustment services,* including: ( 1 ) *Emergency services,* as follows: Assessment and short-term counseling to persons or families in a perceived crisis; referral to appropriate resources; and the making of arrangements for necessary services.
( 2 ) *Health-related services,* as follows: Information; referral to appropriate resources; assistance in scheduling appointments and obtaining services; and counseling to individuals or families to help them understand and identify their physical and mental health needs and maintain or improve their physical and mental health.
( 3 ) *Home management services,* as follows: Formal or informal instruction to individuals or families in management of household budgets, home maintenance, nutrition, housing standards, tenants' rights, and other consumer education services.
( d ) *Day care for children,* when necessary for participation in a service other than an employability service.
( e ) *Transportation,* when necessary for participation in a service other than an employability service.
( f ) *Translation and interpreter services,* when necessary for a purpose other than in connection with employment or participation in an employability service.
( g ) *Case management services,* when necessary for a purpose other than in connection with employment or participation in employability services.
( h ) *Any additional service,* upon submission to and approval by the Director of ORR, aimed at strengthening and supporting the ability of a refugee individual, family, or refugee community to achieve and maintain economic self-sufficiency, family stability, or community integration which has been demonstrated as effective and is not available from any other funding source.
( i ) Citizenship and naturalization preparation services, including English language training and civics instruction to prepare refugees for citizenship, application assistance for adjustment to legal permanent resident status and citizenship status, assistance to disabled refugees in obtaining disability waivers from English and civics requirements for naturalization, and the provision of interpreter services for the citizenship interview.
[54 FR 5481, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33603, June 28, 1995; 65 FR 15449, Mar. 22, 2000]
§ 261.20 How will we hold a State accountable for achieving the work objectives of TANF? ( a ) Each State must meet two separate work participation rates in FY 2006 and thereafter, one—the two-parent rate based on how well it succeeds in helping work-eligible individuals in two-parent families find work activities described at § 261.30, the other—the overall rate based on how well it succeeds in finding those activities for work-eligible individuals in all the families that it serves.
( b ) Each State must submit data, as specified at § 265.3 of this chapter, that allows us to measure its success in requiring work-eligible individuals to participate in work activities.
( c ) If the data show that a State met both participation rates in a fiscal year, then the percentage of historic State expenditures that it must expend under TANF, pursuant to § 263.1 of this chapter, decreases from 80 percent to 75 percent for that fiscal year. This is also known as the State's TANF “maintenance-of-effort” (MOE) requirement.
( d ) If the data show that a State did not meet a minimum work participation rate for a fiscal year, a State could be subject to a financial penalty.
( e ) Before we impose a penalty, a State will have the opportunity to claim reasonable cause or enter into a corrective compliance plan, pursuant to §§ 262.5 and 262.6 of this chapter.
§ 1626.6 Verification of citizenship. ( a ) A recipient shall require all applicants for legal assistance who claim to be citizens to attest in writing in a standard form provided by the Corporation that they are citizens, unless the only service provided for a citizen is brief advice and consultation by telephone, or by other non-in-person means, which does not include continuous representation.
( b ) When a recipient has reason to doubt that an applicant is a citizen, the recipient shall require verification of citizenship. A recipient shall not consider factors such as a person's accent, limited English-speaking ability, appearance, race, or national origin as a reason to doubt that the person is a citizen. ( 1 ) If verification is required, a recipient may accept originals, certified copies, or photocopies that appear to be complete, correct, and authentic of any of the following documents as evidence of citizenship: ( i ) United States passport;
( ii ) Birth certificate;
( iii ) Naturalization certificate;
( iv ) United States Citizenship Identification Card (INS Form 1-197 or I-197); or
( v ) Baptismal certificate showing place of birth within the United States and date of baptism within two months after birth.
( 2 ) A recipient may also accept any other authoritative document, such as a document issued by DHS, by a court, or by another governmental agency, that provides evidence of citizenship.
( 3 ) If a person is unable to produce any of the above documents, the person may submit a notarized statement signed by a third party, who shall not be an employee of the recipient and who can produce proof of that party's own United States citizenship, that the person seeking legal assistance is a United States citizen.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

College CurriculumCommunity CollegesCurriculum EvaluationEducational ChangeEducational TrendsInstitutional RolePostsecondary EducationStudent Educational ObjectivesTwo Year Colleges

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 13

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gaming Ventures plc (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of such officer's knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

             Date: July 24, 2008       By: /s/ Shimon Citron
                                       ---------------------
                                       Shimon Citron, Chief Executive Officer

             Date: July 24, 2008       By: /s/ Jacob Bar-shalom
                                       ------------------------
                                       Jacob Bar-Shalom, Chief Financial Officer
```
# 6H

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0114 TAMARA BARNHART,

Petit io ner and Appellee v. MONTANA STATE FUND,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Laurie Wallace,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appoint me nt as mediators for Workers' C om pensat io n appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from t he date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s March 28, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Lucas Alan Wallace, Nicho las Jon Mazanec, Paul D. Odegaard, Laurie Wallace 03/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0114
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dominic Ng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:           November 8, 2010








/s/ DOMINIC NG


Dominic Ng


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 2554.26 Are there limits on disclosure of documents or discovery? ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review all non-privileged, relevant and material documents, records and other material related to the allegations contained in the complaint. After paying the Corporation a reasonable fee for duplication, the defendant may obtain a copy of the records described.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only the portion of the document containing exculpatory information must be disclosed. As used in this section, the term “information” does not include legal materials such as statutes or case law obtained through legal research.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) Other discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ and includes only those methods of discovery allowed by § 2554.25.