alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

,

Z./1

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WAo;IIINf; rON. U C 1\1-\"1

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

DEL MONTE VOLUNTARY NONPARTISAN

GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND

I. Background

Overview

This report covers tI/I audit of the',Del Monte Voluntary

Nonpartisan Good Government 1·'\lIll.1 (lithe Committee"), undertaken

by the Audit Division of the I··ec.leral Election Commission in

accordance with the Commission's audit policy to determine whether

there has been compliance with the provisions of the Federal

rnection Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Act"). The audit w~s conducted pursuant to Section 438(a) (8) of Title 2 of the

united States Code, which directs the Commission to make from

time to time audits and· field investigations with respect to r0D"rt~ ~n~ st~t0ments filed under the provisio~s of l~e Act.

:rhe Cor.unittee re'li:3ter<..!d wich the Grucea Stacc;., house

or Representatives on July 10, 1972. The purpose of the Committee

is ~o support legis~ators w~o w~ll ~upport the views,of big . ~''''~'~~sJ' ,!,1,'1 ~<:n'"'1tt0('" m"l!,t...,~ns Ji:s h".,:,.~qlJ'1"!"'t0rs l.n Snn F't'anc~sco,

CLlli~orni.:l.

The audit covered the period from January 1, 1977

through October 31, 1979, the final coverage date of the most

recent report filed by the Conwittee at the time of the audit.

'1'he Committee reported a beginning cash balance on January 1,

1977 of $395.81, total receipts for the period of $18,246.00,

total expenditures for the period of $17,998.47 and a closing

cash balance on October 31, 1979 of $643.34.

This audit report is based on documents and working

papers which support each of the factual statements. They forn

part of the record upon which the Commission based its decisions

on the matters in this report and were available to Commissioners

and appropriate staff for review.
o

1'.

I

c

:j

,

"

•

-2-

B. Key Personnel

'l'he principal officers of thu Committee during the

period auditt~d were Mr. Michael P. Roudnev, Chairman and

Mr. Willem II. Van Lienden, Treasurer.

The audit included ~.;uch tests as verification of

totlll report.ed r~ceipts and e:-:pnndil.llr8s and individual

transilctions; review of required supportinCJ documentation and

analysis of Committee debts and obl.i.qlltions; and, such other

i:llilli t proc('l!ures llS deemed necessllry under the circumstances.

I I. Pi:H.Li.:~; an'1 R\:~co:T\I':1cnd.:ltion

Based upon examination of the r.eports and statements filed

and the records presented by the Del Monte Voluntary Nonpartisan

Good Govermne:'lt Fund, no materilll problems in complying with the

Fedcrlll Election Campaign Act were d b.;c~overed during the course

of the lludit.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul H. McDonoughChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: February 28, 2007 | /s/ Paul H. McDonough   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         | Paul H. McDonough       |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
19–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPT. 112–240 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session Part 2 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 3079) 

TO IMPLEMENT THE UNITED STATES-PANAMA TRADE 

PROMOTION AGREEMENT 

OCTOBER 11, 2011.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H. Res. 425] 

The explanation of waivers contained in H. Rept. 112–240, part 

1 regarding H.R. 3079, a bill to implement the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement, indicated that the waiver of all 

points of order against the bill and provisions in the bill was prophylactic in nature. 

Subsequent to filing its report, the Committee was made aware 

of a violation of clause 10 of rule XXI because the bill reduces foreign receipts by $5 million over the period of 2012 through 2016, 

and these reductions in receipts are scored as increases in direct 

spending. While the bill fails to comply with clause 10 of rule XXI 

over the five year period, it would have the net effect of decreasing 

direct spending by $8 million over the ten year period of 2012 

through 2021. The Committee is filing this supplemental report to 

indicate that the waiver of all points of order in the rule includes 

a waiver of clause 10 of rule XXI against consideration of the bill. 

It is important to note that the measure being considered in the 

House originated with the Administration and is being considered 

under section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974. Under those procedures, amendments—even to address violations of House rules— 

are not permitted. Accordingly, the Committee would have granted 

the waiver had it been aware of its necessity at the time of reporting. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
From: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US 

To: SHARDY@mountainland.org 

Date: 12/29/2009 10:08 AM 

Subject:Fw: EPA-R08-OAR-2006-0013: FRL-9087-5 

Ms. Hardy: 

We are in receipt of your request that EPA extend the public comment period on the proposed 

rule published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2009 related to Utah PM10 submittals. 

We received a number of requests to extend the comment period. 

We intend to publish a notice in the Federal Register by the end of this year to extend the 

comment period until March 1, 2010. 

Thank you. 

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief 

Air Quality Planning Unit 

Air Program (8P-AR) 

U.S. EPA Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80202-1129 

phone (303) 312-6936 

fax (303) 312-6064 

From: "SUSAN HARDY" <SHARDY@mountainland.org> 

To: Callie Videtich/P2/R8/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Steven Call" <steven.call@fhwa.dot.gov>, "ANDREW JACKSON" 

<AJACKSON@mountainland.org>, "Ahmad Jaber" <ajaber@utah.gov>, "Bryce Bird" 

<bbird@utah.gov>, "Bill Reiss" <breiss@utah.gov>, "Elden Bingham" <eldenbingham@utah.gov>, 

"Kip Billings" <kbillings@wfrc.org> 

Date: 12/15/2009 09:19 AM 

Subject:EPA-R08-OAR-2006-0013: FRL-9087-5 

Callie Videtich 

Director Air Program, EPA Region 8 

Dear Callie, 

Mountainland AOG, the MPO for the Utah County non attainment areas 

intends to submit comments to the above disapproval proposal of the Utah 

County PM10 Maintenance plan. 

Due to the extensive amount of supporting data that needs to be 

collected and the Holiday period we are heading into, we would like to 

respectfully request an extension to the comment period from Dec. 31st 

to February 28th. 

This issue is very important to us as a transportation planning 
organization and has great impact on our operations. 

We hope EPA region 8, would respond positively to this extension 

request. 

Respectfully 

Susan Hardy 

Susan E. Hardy 

Architect/Urban Planner 

Air Quality Program Manager 

Mountainland Association of Governments 

586 east 800 north 

Orem, Utah 84097- 4146 

Phone - (801) 229-3842 

Fax - (801) 229-3801 

email: shardy@mountainland.org
§ 260.54 Do States have flexibility to grant good cause domestic violence waivers? ( a ) Yes; States have broad flexibility to grant these waivers to victims of domestic violence. For example, they may determine which program requirements to waive and decide how long each waiver might be necessary.
( b ) However, if a State wants us to take the waivers that it grants into account in deciding if it has reasonable cause for failing to meet its work participation rates or comply with the five-year limit on Federal assistance, has achieved compliance or made significant progress towards achieving compliance with such requirements during a corrective compliance period, or qualifies for a reduction in its work penalty under § 261.51 of this chapter, the waivers must be federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers, within the meaning of §§ 260.52(c) and 260.55, and the State must submit the information specified at § 265.9(b)(5) of this chapter on its strategies and procedures for serving victims of domestic violence and the number of waivers granted.
U.S. Department of Labor 

Wage and Hour Division 

(Revised July 2009) 

Fact Sheet #65: Rounding Practices for Student-Learners Earning 

Subminimum Wages 

This fact sheet provides general information concerning rounding practices for student-learner wages. 

Definition 

Section 14(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) authorizes the payment of subminimum wages to a student-learner 

after the employer has applied for an authorizing certificate from the U. S. Department of Labor (DOL). Under 

regulations issued by the Wage and Hour Division, a student-learner is a student who is at least sixteen years of age (or at 

least eighteen years of age if employed in an occupation that the Secretary of Labor has declared to be particularly 

hazardous); who is receiving instruction in any accredited school, college, or university; and who is employed by an 

establishment on a part-time basis, pursuant to a bona fide vocational training program. Employers wishing to employ 

student-learners at subminimum wages under section 14(a) – at rates not less than 75 percent of the applicable minimum 

wage under section 6(a) of the FLSA – must first complete and submit Form WH-205. 

Forwarding of the application to DOL constitutes temporary authority to pay a subminimum wage to the student-learner. 

Thirty days after forwarding, the application shall become the permanent special student-learner certificate unless the 

DOL denies the application, issues a certificate with modified terms and conditions, or expressly extends the period of 

review. 

Typical Problems 

Problems may arise when employers fail to round correctly. For example, when employers “round down” and pay 

student-learners less than the 75 percent of the federal minimum wage, they are in violation of the certificate. Please see 

below for proper calculation: 

Employees covered by the Federal Minimum Wage: 

75% of minimum wage: 

$7.25 (current federal minimum wage) 

X .75 

= 5.4375 or round up to $5.44

Do NOT round down to $5.43

***Please note that the federal minimum wage increased to $7.25 effective July 24, 2009. For an employer to be in 

compliance after that date it must pay student-learners a minimum of $5.4375 (75 percent of the new federal minimum 

wage) or round up to $5.44. 

Where to Obtain Additional Information 

For additional information, visit our Wage and Hour Division Website: http://www.wagehour.dol.gov and/or call 

our toll-free information and helpline, available 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in your time zone, 1-866-4USWAGE (1-866-487-

9243). This publication is for general information and is not to be considered in the same light as official statements of 

position contained in the regulations. 

U.S. Department of Labor

Frances Perkins Building 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

1-866-4-USWAGE, 

TTY: 1-866-487-9243

Contact Us
§ 305.64 Audit procedures and State comments. ( a ) Prior to the start of the actual audit, Federal auditors will hold an audit entrance conference with the IV-D agency. At that conference, the auditors will explain how the audit will be performed and make any necessary arrangements.
( b ) At the conclusion of audit fieldwork, Federal auditors will afford the State IV-D agency an opportunity for an audit exit conference at which time preliminary audit findings will be discussed and the IV-D agency may present any additional matter it believes should be considered in the audit findings.
( c ) After the exit conference, Federal auditors will prepare and send to the IV-D agency a copy of their interim report on the results of the audit. Within a specified timeframe from the date the report was sent, the IV-D agency may submit comments, which are reflected in a record, on any part of the report which the IV-D agency believes is in error. The auditors will note such comments and incorporate any response into the final audit report.
[65 FR 82208, Dec. 27, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 93568, Dec. 20, 2016]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

Office of Inspector General 

Agreed-upon Procedures on DHS’ 

3rd Quarter Intragovernmental 

Activity and Balances 

OIG-07-78 September 2007 








Report Distribution 

Department of Homeland Security 

Secretary 

Deputy Secretary 

General Counsel 

Chief of Staff 

Deputy Chief of Staff 

Executive Secretariat 

Under Secretary, Management 

Chief Information Officer 

Chief Financial Officer 

Chief Information Security Officer 

Assistant Secretary, Public Affairs 

Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs 

Assistant Secretary, Policy 

DHS Audit Liaison 

Chief Information Officer, Audit Liaison 

Office of Management and Budget 

Chief, Financial Standards and Grants Branch 

 Office of Federal Financial Management 

Chief, Homeland Security Branch 

DHS OIG Budget Examiner 

Department of Treasury 

Director, Financial and Budget Reporting Directorate, 

 Financial Management Services 

Director, Financial Reporting Division, Financial Management Services 

Governmental Accountability Office 

Congress 

Congressional Oversight and Appropriations Committees, as appropriate 
Additional Information and Copies 

To obtain additional copies of this report, call the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG) at (202) 254-4199, fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web 

site at www.dhs.gov/oig. 

OIG Hotline 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of 

criminal or noncriminal misconduct relative to department programs or 

operations: 

• Call our Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; 

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292; 

• Email us at DHSOIGHOTLINE@dhs.gov; or 

• Write to us at: 

DHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600, Attention: 

Office of Investigations - Hotline, 245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410, 

Washington, DC 20528. 

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Biosolar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Lee, Chief
      Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




March
              25, 2008
            
            */s/
              David Lee*David
                Lee
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1466

MONIQUE R. SMALL DREW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, PARKING AND 

TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00429-JAG)

Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique R. Small Drew, Appellant Pro Se. George William Norris, Jr., General 

Counsel’s Office, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Monique R. Small Drew appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction the amended civil complaint in which Drew alleged violations 

of the Americans with Disabilities Act.* See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2012). We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Drew v. VCU, Parking & Transp., No. 3:17-cv00429-JAG (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Drew initially filed suit in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia, 

and Defendant timely removed this matter to federal court.
§ 233.39 Age. ( a ) *Condition for plan approval.* A State plan under title I or XVI of the Social Security Act may not impose any age requirement of more than 65 years.
( b ) *Federal financial participation.* ( 1 ) Federal financial participation is available in financial assistance provided to otherwise eligible persons who were, for any portion of the month for which assistance is paid: ( i ) In OAA or AABD with respect to the aged, 65 years of age or over;
( ii ) In AFDC, under 18 years of age; or age 18 if a full-time student in a secondary school, or in the equivalent level of vocational or technical training, and reasonably expected to complete the program before reaching age 19.
( iii ) In AB or AABD with respect to the blind, any age;
( iv ) In APTD or AABD with respect to the disabled, 18 years of age or older.
( 2 ) Federal determination of whether an individual meets the age requirements of the Social Security Act will be made according to the common-law method (under which a specific age is attained the day before the anniversary of birth), unless the State plan specifies that the popular usage method (under which an age is attained on the anniversary of birth), is used.
( 3 ) The State agency may adopt an arbitrary date such as July 1 as the point from which age will be computed in all instances where the month of an individual's birth is not available, but the year can be established.
[36 FR 3866, Feb. 27, 1971. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 5678, Feb. 5, 1982]
MEMORANDUM

DATE: July 30, 2015

TO: Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric 

Utility Generating Units; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Zach Pilchen, EPA Office of General Counsel

SUBJECT: April and June 17, 2015 call with external stakeholders regarding requirements 

applicable to state plans

SUMMARY

A phone call was held between myself and Richard Revesz of the Institute for Policy 

Integrity at NYU Law School in late April 2015, to discuss his views on state plans for the 

Proposed Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units. A subsequent call was held between myself, Prof. Revesz, and Denise Grab 

(also of the Institute for Policy Integrity) on June 17, 2015 to discuss their views on state plans 

for the Proposed Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric 

Utility Generating Units. The Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines were proposed on June 2, 

2014 and published in the Federal Register on June 18, 2014.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

October 22, 2018 

MEMORANDUM

TO: Patricia C. Orrock

Chief Compliance Officer

Thomas E. Hintermister

Assistant Staff Director

Audit Division

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic 

Acting Associate General Counsel

Policy Division

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel

Compliance Advice 

Joshua Blume 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on Tony Cardenas for Congress (LRA 1074) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report (“DFAR”) 

on Tony Cardenas for Congress (“the Committee”). The DFAR contains two findings: 

Misstatement of Financial Activity (Finding 1) and Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the 

Limit (Finding 2). We concur with both findings. Should you have any questions, please 

contact Joshua Blume, the attorney assigned to this audit.
§ 2556.115 Is a VISTA sponsor required to provide a cash or in-kind match? ( a ) A sponsor is not required to provide a cash match for any of the assistance listed in § 2556.110.
( b ) A sponsor must provide supervision, workspace, service-related transportation, and any other materials necessary to operate and complete the VISTA project and support the VISTA.
#### § 2554.16 What kind of hearing is contemplated?

The hearing is a formal proceeding conducted by the ALJ during which a defendant will have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, present testimony, and dispute liability.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Varsity Group Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | 
|Date: August 16, 2004 |  | /s/ Eric J. Kuhn                                                  
|                      |  | Eric J. Kuhn Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Biosolar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Lee, Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




March
      24, 2010
            /s/ David
      LeeDavid
      LeeChief
      Executive Officer andActing
      Chief Financial Officer