alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1576 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1576

                   For the relief of Daniel Wachira.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2009

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Daniel Wachira.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DANIEL WACHIRA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Daniel Wachira shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Daniel Wachira enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Daniel Wachira, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Daniel 
Wachira shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 150.463 Final order not subject to review.

In an action brought under § 150.461, the validity and appropriateness of the final order described in § 150.459 is not subject to review.
#### § 504.5 Documents to accompany forms.

All claims filed pursuant to sections 5(a) and 6(f) of the Act must be accompanied by evidentiary documents, instruments, and records as outlined in the instruction sheet attached to the claim form.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Henry Hosier, Respondent.

*People*v. *Hosier,*132 App. Div. 146, affirmed.

(Argued June 14,1909;

decided October 6, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 12, 1909, which reversed a judgment of the Court of Gen*507eral Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree and granted a new trial.

*William Travers*Jerome, *District Attorney {E. Crosby Kindleberger*of counsel), for appellant.

*John M. Coleman*for respondent.

Order affirmed ; no opinion.

. Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Chase, J.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bradley J. Wright,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FBR & Co.;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016



/s/ Bradley J. WrightBradley J. WrightChief Financial Officer
§ 2507.21 Other charges. ( a ) *Charges for other services.* Although it is not required to provide special services, if AmeriCorps chooses as a matter of administrative discretion to do so, it will charge the direct costs of providing those services. Examples of such services include certifying that records are true copies, providing multiple copies of the same document, or sending records by means other than first class mail.
( b ) *Charging interest.* AmeriCorps may charge interest on any unpaid bill starting on the 31st day following the billing date. Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the billing date until payment is received by the agency. AmeriCorps will follow the provisions of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended, and its administrative procedures, including the use of consumer reporting agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
[Civ. No. 11413.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

November 16, 1940.]

#### W. J. KIRKPATRICK, Respondent, v. McLAUGHLIN LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO. et al., Appellants. W. J. KIRKPATRICK, Respondent, v. McLAUGHLIN LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO. et al., Appellants.

[Civ. No. 11414.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

November 16, 1940.]

Garth V. Lacey, Wyckoff, Gardner & Parker and Harry L. Noland for Appellants.

C. H. White, D. Bianco, Keyes & Erskine and Geo. D. Schilling for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The plaintiff sued to enforce a judgment recovered by H. H. Bechtel against these defendants and assigned to this plaintiff for collection. In their answer and cross-complaint these defendants attacked the Bechtel judgment upon the grounds of irregularities in proceedings under the original trust relation leading up to the foreclosure and sale, but not upon grounds of extrinsic fraud affecting the judgment.

For these reasons the trial court sustained plaintiff’s demurrer to the answer and cross-complaint, and this order is the subject of the appeal in case number 11413. Pending this appeal the cause was tried on its merits, and plaintiff had judgment from which appeal number 11414 is taken.

By stipulation of the parties in these appeals and in *Bank of America, etc.,*v. *McLaughlin Land and Livestock Co.,*number 11350, 40 Cal. App. (2d) 620 [105 Pac. (2d) 607], it has been agreed that upon the affirmance of the judgment *955in case number 11350 these appeals numbered 11413 and 11414 shall be dismissed and that *remittiturs*shall issue as soon as the affirmance of that judgment shall become final.

It is therefore ordered that these appeals be dismissed in accord with said stipulation and that the *remittiturs*issue forthwith.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

The undersigned, Anthony J. Armini, the Chief Executive Officer of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certifies that:



| |  | Dated: May 17, 2004                                           
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Anthony J. ArminiAnthony J. Armini
Chief Executive Officer

This
certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

---
Exhibit 99.8









|KPMG LLP                         | Telephone |  | (604) 691-3000
|-------------------------------- | --------- |  | --------------
|Chartered Accountants            | Fax       |  | (604) 691-3031
|PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street | Internet  |  | www.kpmg.ca   
|Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3             |           |  |               
|Canada                           |           |  |               





Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors of Westport Innovations Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 25, 2014,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Westport Innovations Inc. (“the Company”) as at December 31,
2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, included in this annual report on
Form 40-F/A.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such
report in the Registration Statements (No. 333-165812 and No. 333-168847) on Forms S-8 (No. 333-187154) and Form F-10/A of the
Company.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants



July 23, 2015

Vancouver, Canada





KPMG
LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG   network
of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss
entity.

KPMG Canada provides services
to KPMG LLP.
---

EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of China Biologic Products, Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated March 23, 2010,
except for the effects on the consolidated financial statements of the
restatement described in Note 2, as to which the date is March 31, 2011, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of China Biologic Products, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income and other comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009,
which report appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of China
Biologic Products, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-171069) and the registration
statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-151263), of the report described above, appearing
in the annual report on Form 10-K of China Biologic Products, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2010.



/s/ Frazer Frost, LLP Brea, California March 31,
2011

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1095

___________

Floyd Webb, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

John C. Kilgore, Sheriff, Lafayette *

County, Arkansas; Bill Butler, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Lafayette County Jail; Vernon Watson, *

Jailer, Lafayette County Jail; Arnold *

Simmons, Jailer, Lafayette County Jail; *

Duncan & Rainwater, P.A., Attorneys; *

Bobby E. Shepherd, U. S. Magistrate *

Judge; Jason Hamilton, Jailer, Lafayette *

County Jail, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 20, 2003

 Filed: March 24, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas.

-2-

Arkansas inmate Floyd Webb appeals the District Court’s1 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Having carefully

reviewed the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per

curiam), we summarily affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court, see 8th Cir.

R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 70641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9561]



[[Page 70639]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Executive Order 13415--Assignment of Certain Pay-Related Functions


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 70641]]

                Executive Order 13415 of December 1, 2006

                
Assignment of Certain Pay-Related Functions

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. Assignment of Functions. The functions of 
                the President under sections 4505a, 5305, and 5377 of 
                title 5, United States Code, are assigned to the 
                Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

                Sec. 2. Revocations. (a) Sections 3 and 6 of Executive 
                Order 12748 of February 1, 1991, as amended, are 
                revoked. Sections 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of Executive Order 
                12748 are renumbered as sections 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, 
                respectively.

                (b) Section 2 of Executive Order 12828 of January 5, 
                1993, is revoked. Section 3 of Executive Order 12828 is 
                renumbered as section 2.

                Sec. 3. General Provision. This order is not intended 
                to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 
                substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in 
                equity against the United States, its departments, 
                agencies, entities, officers, employees, or agents, or 
                any other person.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    December 1, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-9561
Filed 12-4-06; 8:49 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 18-5099 September Term, 2019

1:17-cv-02694-ABJ

Filed On: March 30, 2020 [1835908]

John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2, 

 Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission, 

 Appellee

M A N D A T E

In accordance with the judgment of April 12, 2019, and pursuant to Federal Rule

of Appellate Procedure 41, this constitutes the formal mandate of this court.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk

Link to the judgment filed April 12, 2019

USCA Case #18-5099 Document #1835908 Filed: 03/30/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 2555.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on ) A13-04 

Roraback for Congress ) 

CERTIFICATION. 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on September 09,2014, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on 

Roraback for Congress, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated September 4,2014. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

10^ XI f 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
§ 5.32 Records not subject to the requirements of the FOIA—law enforcement exclusions. Under the FOIA, there is special protection for narrow categories of law enforcement and national security records. The provisions protecting those records are known as “exclusions” and are described in 5 U.S.C. 552(c). These exclusions expressly authorize Federal law enforcement agencies, under these exceptional circumstances, to treat the records as not subject to the requirements of the FOIA. ( a ) Should an HHS OpDiv or StaffDiv maintain records which are subject to a FOIA exclusion, and consider employing an exclusion or have a question as to the implementation of an exclusion, the OpDiv or StaffDiv will consult with the Office of Information Policy, U.S. Department of Justice.
( b ) Because records falling within an exclusion are not subject to the requirements of the FOIA, should any HHS OpDiv or StaffDiv maintain such excluded records, the OpDiv or StaffDiv will limit its response to those records that are subject to the FOIA.
#### § 264.2 What happens if a State does not comply with the five-year limit?

If we determine that a State has not complied with the requirements of § 264.1, we will reduce the SFAG payable to the State for the immediately succeeding fiscal year by five percent of the adjusted SFAG unless the State demonstrates to our satisfaction that it had reasonable cause, or it corrects or discontinues the violation under an approved corrective compliance plan.
§ 400.301 Withdrawal from the refugee program. ( a ) In the event that a State decides to cease participation in the refugee program, the State must provide 120 days advance notice to the Director before withdrawing from the program.
( b ) To participate in the refugee program, a State is expected to operate all components of the refugee program, including refugee cash and medical assistance, social services, preventive health, and an unaccompanied minors program if appropriate. A State is also expected to play a coordinating role in the provision of assistance and services in accordance with § 400.5(b). In the event that a State wishes to retain responsibility for only part of the refugee program, it must obtain prior approval from the Director of ORR. Such approval will be granted if it is in the best interest of the Government.
( c ) When a State withdraws from all or part of the refugee program, the Director may authorize a replacement designee or designees to administer the provision of assistance and services, as appropriate, to refugees in that State. A replacement designee must adhere to the same regulations under this part that apply to a State-administered program, with the exception of the following provisions: 45 CFR 400.5(d), 400.7, 400.51(b)(2)(i), 400.58(c), 400.94(a), 400.94(b), 400.94(c), and subpart L. Replacement designees must also adhere to the Subpart L regulations regarding formula allocation grants for targeted assistance, if the State authorized the replacement designee appointed by the Director to act as its agent in applying for and receiving targeted assistance funds. Certain provisions are excepted because they apply only to States and become moot when a State withdraws from participation in the refugee program and is replaced by another entity. States would continue to be responsible for administering the other excepted provisions because these provisions refer to the administration of other State-run public assistance programs.
[60 FR 33604, June 28, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 15450, Mar. 22, 2000]
§ 2556.410 May a sponsor request that a VISTA be removed from its project? ( a ) The head of a sponsoring organization, or their designee, may request that AmeriCorps remove a VISTA assigned to its project. Any such request must be submitted in writing to the appropriate Portfolio Manager and should state the reasons for the request.
( b ) The Portfolio Manager may, at their discretion, attempt to resolve the situation with the sponsor so that a solution other than removal of the VISTA from the project assignment is reached.
( c ) When an alternative solution, as referenced in paragraph (b) of this section, is not sought, or is not reached within a reasonable time period, the VISTA Case Manager will remove the VISTA from the project.
§ 309.01 What does this part cover? ( a ) The regulations in this part prescribe the rules for implementing section 455(f) of the Social Security Act. Section 455(f) of the Act authorizes direct grants to Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations to operate child support enforcement programs.
( b ) These regulations establish the requirements that must be met by Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations to be eligible for grants under section 455(f) of the Act. They establish requirements for: Tribal IV-D plan and application content, submission, approval, and amendment; program funding; program operation; uses of funds; accountability; reporting; and other program requirements and procedures.
#### § 2552.42 What types of criminal convictions or other adjudications
disqualify an individual from serving as a Foster Grandparent or as a Foster Grandparent grant-funded employee?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544, Aug. 30, 2024.

Any individual who is registered, or who is required to be registered, on a State sex offender registry, or who has been convicted of murder, as defined under Federal law in section 1111 of title 18, United States Code, is deemed unsuitable for, and may not serve in, a position as a Foster Grandparent or as a Foster Grandparent grant-funded employee.

[74 FR 46509, Sept. 10, 2009]