alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6962

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL TRACY HARMON, a/k/a Mike, a/k/a Mikey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Tracy Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, Robert Joseph

Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Tracy Harmon appeals the district court’s orders

denying Harmon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2000), and Harmon’s motions for reconsideration of that order. We

have reviewed the record and affirm the denial of the underlying

order for the reasons stated by the district court. In addition,

we find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in denying the

motions for reconsideration. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d

310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. United States v. Harmon, No. 2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13

(E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2006; April 19, 2006; May 2, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Representative Alan Austerman 

Alaska State Legislature 

Session: 

State Capitol 

Interim: 

305 Center Ave, Suite 1 

Kodiak, Alaska 99615 

(907) 486-8872 

(907) 486-5264 (fax) 

Juneau, Alaska 99801 

(907) 465-2487 1 (800) 865-2487 

(907) 465-4956 (fax) 

August 9, 2013 

United States Department of Transportation 

Offi€e of the Secretary 

EAS@dot.gov 

Attn: Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 

Kevin.Adams@dot.gov 

RE: Kodiak Eleven water stops 

Dear Mr. Adams, 

'···I, 

I am writing to encourage you to consider re-selecting Redemption, Inc., d/b/a Island Air Service for 

the Kodiak Essential Air Service bid for the Kodiak Eleven water stops. Island Air Service has been 

serving Kodiak's outlying communities for over 30 years and I trust that they have the necessary 

experience and dedication to carry out the contract. 

Sincerely, 

Alan Austerman 

House District 35 

Cc: Senator Gary Stevens, District R 

~ Representing Alaska State House District 35 ~ 

Akhiok I Aleneva I Chenega I Cordova I Karluk I Kodiak I Larsen Bay 

Old Harbor I Ouzinkie I Port Lions I Tatitlek I Whittier I Yakutat
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.19 Bonding of employees. The State plan shall provide that the following requirements and criteria to bond employees are in effect: ( a ) *IV-D responsibility.* The IV-D agency will insure that every person, who has access to or control over funds collected under the child support enforcement program, is covered by a bond against loss resulting from employee dishonesty.
( b ) *Scope.* The requirement in paragraph (a) of this section applies to every person who, as a regular part of his or her employment, receives, disburses, handles or has access to support collections, which includes: ( 1 ) IV-D agency employees and employees of any other State or local agency to which IV-D functions have been delegated.
( 2 ) Employees of a court or law enforcement official performing under a cooperative agreement with the IV-D agency.
( 3 ) Employees of any private or governmental entity from which the IV-D agency purchases services.
( c ) *Bond.* The bond will be for an amount which the State IV-D agency deems adequate to indemnify the State IV-D program for loss resulting from employee dishonesty.
( d ) *Self-bonding System.* A State or political subdivision may comply with the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) By means of a self-bonding system established under State law or,
( 2 ) In the case of a political subdivision, by means of a self-bonding system approved by the State IV-D agency.
( e ) *IV-D liability.* The requirements of this section do not reduce or limit the ultimate liability of the IV-D agency for losses of support collections from the State's IV-D program.
[44 FR 28803, May 17, 1979; 44 FR 45137, Aug. 1, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 57281, Dec. 23, 1982]
124 STAT. 2902 PUBLIC LAW 111–279—OCT. 13, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5450: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

July 14, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–279 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3894 Crenshaw 

Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Tom Bradley Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TOM BRADLEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tom Bradley Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Tom Bradley Post Office Building’’. 

Approved October 13, 2010. 

Oct. 13, 2010 

[H.R. 5450] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
§ 617.12 Compliance procedure. ( a ) NSF may enforce this part by either termination of a recipient's financial asistance from NSF for the program or activity involved where the recipient has violated the Act or this part or refusal to grant further financial assistance under the program or activity involved where the recipient has violated the Act or this part. The determination of the recipient's violation may be made only after a recipient has had an opportunity for a hearing on the record before an administrative law judge. Therefore, cases settled in the mediation process or before a hearing will not involve termination of a recipient's Federal financial assistance from NSF.
( b ) NSF may also enforce this part by any other means authorized by law, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Referral to the Department of Justice for proceedings to enforce any rights of the United States or obligations by this part.
( 2 ) Use of any requirement of or referral to any Federal, State, or local government agency that will have the effect of correcting a violation of the Act or this part.
( c ) NSF will limit any termination or refusal to grant further financial assistance to the particular recipient and the particular program or activity found to be in violation of the Act. NSF will not base any part of a termination or refusal on a finding with respect to any program or activity of the recipient which does not receive Federal financial assistance for NSF.
( d ) NSF will not begin any hearing under paragraph (a) until the Director has advised the recipient of its failure to comply with this part and has determined that voluntary compliance cannot be obtained.
( e ) NSF will not terminate or refuse to grant financial assistance until thirty days have elapsed after the Director has sent a written report of the circumstances and grounds of the action to the committees of the Congress having legislative jurisdiction over the program or activity involved. The Director will file a report whenever any action is taken under paragraph (f) of this section.
( f ) *Alternate Funds Disbursal Procedures.* ( 1 ) When NSF withholds funds from a recipient under these regulations, the Secretary may disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient: Any public or non-profit private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( 2 ) The Director will require any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( i ) The ability to comply with these regulations; and
( ii ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
[49 FR 49628, Dec. 21, 1984, as amended at 68 FR 51383, Aug. 26, 2003]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Smoky Market Foods, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
C. Feintech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edward C. Feintech
----------------------------------------
Edward C. Feintech
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2008
#### The State Bank, Respondent, *v.*Henry Wilchinsky et al., Defendants. In the Matter of Proceedings to Compel Harris Shapiro, Appellant, to Complete His Purchase.

*State Bank*v. *Wilchinsky,*134 App. Div. 948, affirmed.

(Argued January 4, 1910;

decided January 18, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 15, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the appellant herein to pay the damages resulting *579from his refusal to complete his purchase of certain, premises at a sale in foreclosure. .

*Edward*W. *S. Johnston*for appellant.

*Benjamin N. Cardozo*and *Alfred Lyons*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, • Ch. J.. Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chas'e, JJ.
#### § 502.8 Documents on-line.

Commission documents available in electronic format may be accessed via the Commission's World Wide Web site, the address of which is *http://www.usdoj.gov/fcsc.*
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.75 Procedures for the imposition of late payment fees on noncustodial parents who owe overdue support. ( a ) Effective September 1, 1984, the State plan may provide for imposition of late payment fees on noncustodial parents who owe overdue support.
( b ) If a State opts to impose late payment fees— ( 1 ) The late payment fee must be uniformly applied in an amount not less than 3 percent nor more than 6 percent of overdue support.
( 2 ) The fee shall accrue as arrearages accumulate and shall not be reduced upon partial payment of arrears. The fee may be collected only after the full amount of overdue support is paid and any requirements under State law for notice to the noncustodial parent have been met.
( 3 ) The collection of the fee must not directly or indirectly reduce the amount of current or overdue support paid to the individual to whom it is owed.
( 4 ) The late payment fee must be imposed in cases where there has been an assignment under section 408(a)(3) of the Act or section 471(a)(17) of the Act or the IV-D agency is providing services under § 302.33 of this chapter.
( 5 ) The State may allow fees collected to be retained by the jurisdiction making the collection.
( 6 ) The State must reduce its expenditures claimed under the Child Support Enforcement program by any fees collected under this section in accordance with § 304.50 of this chapter.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0385) [50 FR 19650, May 9, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 37731, Oct. 24, 1986; 56 FR 8004, Feb. 26, 1991; 64 FR 6249, Feb. 9, 1999; 68 FR 25303, May 12, 2003]
```

[109th Congress Public Law 267]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ267.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 680]]

Public Law 109-267
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 to extend the 
authorities provided in such Act until September 29, 2006. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                        4, 2006 -  [H.R. 5877]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IRAN AND LIBYA SANCTIONS 
            ACT OF 1996.

    Section 13(b) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public 
Law 104-172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ``on the date 
that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act'' and 
inserting ``on September 29, 2006''.

    Approved August 4, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5877:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 26, considered and passed House.
            July 31, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 212.10 Nondiscrimination. ( a ) No eligible person shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation, be denied any benefits, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination of any nature or form in the provision of any benefits under the Act.
( b ) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section precludes discrimination either in the selection of individuals to receive the benefits, in the scope of benefits, or in the manner of providing them. It extends to all facilities and services provided by the Administration or an agency to an individual, and to the arrangements and the procedures under this part relating thereto, in connection with reception and temporary assistance under the Act.
[39 FR 26548, July 19, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 19864, Apr. 21, 1995]
Exhibit 35.1**[CHASE LOGO]****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**RE: ChaseFlex Trust (CFLX) 2006-2: The Pooling and Servicing Agreement by and among ChaseMortgage Finance Co as Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, JPMorgan ChaseBank, NA as Custodian, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. asServicer, (the “Agreement”)The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, asservicer (the “Servicer”) pursuant to the ChaseFlex Trust (CFLX) 2006-2 (The “Agreement”), doeshereby certify that:          (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ending December 31,2006 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;and          (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.Date: 02/28/2007         JPMorgan Chase Bank,National Association,as Servicer           By: /s/ David Lowman           Name: David Lowman    Title: Executive Vice President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2019

No. 04-19-00614-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF BABY GIRL RODRIGUEZ,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA01873

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion for a seven-day extension of time to file a brief. We grant 

the motion and order appellant’s brief filed by November 13, 2019.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
§ 2544.110 What definitions apply to terms used in this part? ( a ) *Donation* means a transfer of money, property, or services to or for the use of the Corporation by gift, devise, bequest, or other means.
( b ) *Solicitation* means a request for a donation.
( c ) *Volunteer* means an individual who donates his/her personal service to the Corporation to assist the Corporation in carrying out its duties under the national service laws, but who is not a participant in a program funded or sponsored by the Corporation under the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as amended. Such individual is not subject to provisions of law related to Federal employment, including those relating to hours of work, rates of compensation, leave, unemployment compensation and Federal employee benefits, except that— ( 1 ) Volunteers will be considered Federal employees for the purpose of the tort claims provisions of 28 U.S.C. chapter 171;
( 2 ) Volunteers will be considered Federal employees for the purposes of 5 U.S.C. chapter 81, subchapter I, relating to compensation to Federal employees for work injuries; and
( 3 ) Volunteers will be considered special Government employees for the purpose of ethics and public integrity under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. chapter 11, part I, and 5 CFR chapter XVI, subchapter B.
( d ) *Inherently governmental function* means any activity that is so intimately related to the public interest as to mandate performance by an officer or employee of the Federal Government, including an activity that requires either the exercise of discretion in applying the authority of the Government or the use of value judgment in making a decision for the Government.
HeinOnline -- 122 Cong. Rec. 24548 1976
HeinOnline -- 122 Cong. Rec. 24549 1976
HeinOnline -- 122 Cong. Rec. 24550 1976
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-9 (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide
Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as Trustee.


Date: March 30, 2007

                           /s/ Robert McGinnis
                           ----------------------------------------
                           Name: Robert McGinnis
                           Title:  President, Greenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, A.C. RUGH, T.H. CAMPBELL

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JAMES D. WYPYCH

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201500401

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 21 Aug 2015.

Military Judge: Maj M.D. Zimmerman, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 1st Marine 

Division (REIN), Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol D.C. Young, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

25 February 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

 For the Court 

 R.H. TROIDL 

 Clerk of Court
#### § 1703.206 Providing information to the public.

Individuals or organizations interested in obtaining copies of information available in accordance with § 1703.204 may request same under provisions set forth in §§ 1703.402 and 1704.404. Individuals or organizations having a special interest in activities of the Commission may request the Executive Director to the Commissioners to place them on a mailing list for receipt of information available under § 1703.205. The Commission shall provide information to publications whose readers are likely to have a special interest in the work of the Commission.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.123 Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals. ( a ) The department or agency head may require that Federal department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.
( b ) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has/have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has/have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).