alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6064

WILLIAM COLEMAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JAMES MCRAE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv - 00131

- FDW )

Submitted : April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinoin

.
William Coleman, Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not app ealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)( 2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDan iel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petiti on states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S.
at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Coleman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q**

**OF GOLDLEAFFINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC.**

**FOR THEQUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned’s best knowledgeand belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Goldleaf FinancialSolutions, Inc. (“Issuer”) for the period ending June 30, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):

 

(a)                                  fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

This Certification is executed as of August 19, 2009.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 
|   | /s/  DANIEL OWENS                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel  Owens*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
6PPI--a0p3-DDI2- 

a PONT 

May 2, 2011 

.,c 

I f MAY I ? AN 9: 32 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

p. 1 

mle-07 

3353~6 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

REN JuN Q2 2011 

Re: EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

January 2011 Sample Data 

Dear Document Control Office : 

As per Part IV, Section G.5 .a of the NJPDES permit, we are submitting a summary of PFOA 

analytical results for the weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A to NJDEP on a 

monthly basis. Per your request, we are sending you a paper and electronic copy of the report for 

samples taken during January 2011 . We will continue to send you the reports each month. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (856) 540-3015 . 

Sincerely, 

Joe Greenfield 

SHE Consultant - Environmental 

DuPont Chambers Works 

Enclosures 

CONTAINS NO CS1 
Copies to : 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Point Source Permitting - Region 2 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box 029 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029
"Willard, Glenn" To "ksmith@fec.gov" <ksmlth@fec.gov> 

<GWIIIard@PatlonBoggs.com ^ "ivicGlnley. William" <WI\/lcGinley@PattonBoggs.com> 

12/28/2012 04:02 PiVI 

Subject RE: FEC Ltr re Hultgren for Congress 

Kendrick: Hultgren for Congress is declining a request for an audit hearing; It was good working with 

you. 

Sincerely, 

Glenn M. Willard 

Fatten Boggs LLP 

2550 M Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20037-1350 

(202) 457-6559 | (202) 457-6315 (F)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40870 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ARMANDO SILVESTRE RAMIREZ

- ROJAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 1562

- 1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Silvestre Ramirez

- Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez

- Rojas filed an untimely document styled as a “notice of appeal” which we construe as a motion for leave to file a late response and as a response (which contained a list of untranslated

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40870 Document: 00512599159 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014No. 13

- 40870
concerns in Spanish and others in English). We GRANT the motion for leave. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ramirez

- Rojas’s document. To the extent that Ramirez

- Rojas is attempting to raise a challenge of ineffective assistance of counsel, we conclude that th e record is insufficiently developed to address these claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. A ccordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40870 Document: 00512599159 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
Exhibit 4.4


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 


 


AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL 401(K) PLAN


 


AS RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2018


 


WHEREAS, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (the “Company”),
adopted a restatement of the Ameriprise Financial 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”), generally effective January 1, 2018, and
subsequently amended;


 


WHEREAS, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the
 “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company has the authority to approve certain amendments to the Plan,
including those contemplated herein;


 


WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Plan provides that the Committee
or its duly appointed delegate is authorized to accelerate the vesting schedule applicable to such nondiscriminatory Participant
group(s) as the Committee or its delegate deems appropriate in its discretion;


 


WHEREAS, the Company and AmFam, Inc., entered into a
stock purchase agreement dated April 1, 2019 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) under which AmFam, Inc., agreed to purchase
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company as of a certain Closing Date described in the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Transaction”);


 


WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Transaction, the Company
is to fully vest the benefit of each Current Employee, as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement, as well as those individuals
employed by the Acquired Companies, as also defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement, who are on a formal and continuous leave of
absence under the Company’s existing policies on the Closing Date, under the Plan in which such Current Employee or individual
participates; and


 


WHEREAS, the undersigned officer of the Company deems
it necessary and appropriate to make this amendment to reflect the changes approved by the Committee;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of the
Closing Date of the Transaction in the following manner:


 


		I.	The following new paragraph shall be added to the end of Section 7.1 of the Plan:



 


Notwithstanding any other provision
of the Plan, with respect to those Participants that are employed by IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, Ameriprise Auto
 & Home Insurance Agency, Inc., or Ameriprise Insurance Agency, Inc., immediately prior to the closing date of the Company’s
divestiture of IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company to AmFam, Inc., and who either continue to be employed by such entities
as of the closing date or who are transferred to the Company due to being on Leave at the time of the closing, the full amount
credited to such Participant’s Account on the closing date of such transaction shall become one hundred percent (100%) vested.


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive Vice President of Human
Resources has caused this Third Amendment to be executed as of the date indicated below.


 





	 	AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Kelli Hunter Petruzillo
	 	 	 
	 	Title:	Executive Vice President, Human Resources
	 	 	 
	 	Date:	November 11, 2019




 






    	 	2
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bradley J. Wright,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FBR & Co.;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 21, 2017



/s/ Bradley J. WrightBradley J. WrightChief Financial Officer
§ 162.910 Maintenance of standards and adoption of modifications and new standards. ( a ) *Designation of DSMOs.* ( 1 ) The Secretary may designate as a DSMO an organization that agrees to conduct, to the satisfaction of the Secretary, the following functions: ( i ) Maintain standards adopted under this subchapter.
( ii ) Receive and process requests for adopting a new standard or modifying an adopted standard.
( 2 ) The Secretary designates a DSMO by notice in the Federal Register.
( b ) *Maintenance of standards.* Maintenance of a standard by the appropriate DSMO constitutes maintenance of the standard for purposes of this part, if done in accordance with the processes the Secretary may require.
( c ) *Process for modification of existing standards and adoption of new standards.* The Secretary considers a recommendation for a proposed modification to an existing standard, or a proposed new standard, only if the recommendation is developed through a process that provides for the following: ( 1 ) Open public access.
( 2 ) Coordination with other DSMOs.
( 3 ) An appeals process for each of the following, if dissatisfied with the decision on the request: ( i ) The requestor of the proposed modification.
( ii ) A DSMO that participated in the review and analysis of the request for the proposed modification, or the proposed new standard.
( 4 ) Expedited process to address content needs identified within the industry, if appropriate.
( 5 ) Submission of the recommendation to the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Damico, Genevieve Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:34 AM To: doug.harris@veoliaes.com Cc: dennis.warchol@veoliaes.com; nancy.paddock@veoliaes .com; Michael.Reed@illinois.gov; ray.pilapil@illinois.gov; Armitage, Julie Subject: RE: Preliminary Draft Title V Renewal Permit Attachments: Veolia Renewal Final Fact Sheet 9-10-14.docx

Doug,

I was just reminded of the Fact Sheet that we have been working on to accompany the draft permit. We would appreciate any comments you have on the enclosed dr aft fact sheet by October 3, 2014 as well.

From: Damico, Genevieve Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 4:29 PM
To: 'doug.harris@veoliaes.com'
Cc: 'dennis.warchol@veoliaes.com'; 'nancy.paddock@veol iaes.com'; 'Michael.Reed@illinois.gov'; ray.pilapil@illinois.gov; Armitage, Julie Subject: Preliminary Draft Title V Renewal Permit

Doug:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has review ed Veolia’s April 8 and August 16, 2013 application for renewal of its Clean Air Act Title V Permit No. V-IL-1716300103-08-01. Attached are a preliminary draft permit and statement of basis for the renewal permi t. EPA is offering you an opportunity to review th ese documents and to voice any specific concerns with t he preliminary draft permit and statement of basis prior to EPA’s issuance of a draft permit for public comment period pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 71.11(a)(5).

Please submit any comments on the preliminary draft permit by October 3, 2014 . In addition, by this email, EPA is inviting you to meet with us by September 30, 2014 , to discuss any concerns you may have on the preliminary draft permit. Please contact me or Dav id Ogulei at (312) 353-0987, to set up this meeting

. Please note that this communication does not repres ent a final Agency action to issue or deny a permit to Veolia under Title V of the Act, or any other kind of final agency action under section 307(b) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b). A final decision on your applica tion will be made after consideration of all releva nt comments received during the public comment period.

Please contact me with any questions.

Genevieve Damico Chief Air Permit Section
---

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, each of Douglas Biles, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert Nicolay, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and
belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 17, 2010 | /s/Douglas
      Biles                 
|------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                          | Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer 
|                          | (Principal Executive Officer)          
|                          |                                        
|Dated: September 17, 2010 | /s/Robert
      Nicolay                
|                          | Robert Nicolay, Chief Financial Officer
|                          | (Principal Accounting Officer)         

---
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 302.85 Mandatory computerized support enforcement system. ( a ) *General.* The State plan shall provide that the State will have in effect a computerized support enforcement system: ( 1 ) This guide is available on the OCSE Web site; and
( 2 ) By October 1, 2000, which meets all the requirements of title IV-D of the Act enacted on or before the date of enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-193, in accordance with §§ 307.5 and 307.11 of this chapter and the OCSE guideline referenced in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Waiver* — ( 1 ) *Request for waiver.* The State may apply for a waiver of any condition for initial approval of an APD in § 307.15(b) of this chapter, or any system functional requirement in § 307.10 of this chapter, by the submission of a request for waiver under § 307.5 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Basis for granting waiver.* The Secretary will grant a State a waiver if a State demonstrates that it has an alternative approach to APD requirements or an alternative system configuration, as defined in § 307.1 of this chapter, that enables the State, in accordance with part 305 of this chapter, to be in substantial compliance with all other requirements of this chapter; and either: ( i ) The waiver request meets the criteria set forth in section 1115(c)(1), (2) and (3) of the Act; or
( ii ) The State provides assurances, which are reflected in a record, that steps will be taken to otherwise improve the State's Child Support Enforcement program.
[57 FR 47002, Oct. 14, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 67241, Dec. 20, 1996; 63 FR 44814, Aug. 21, 1998; 81 FR 93563, Dec. 20, 2016]
|   | 1.     The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.     The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and   results of      operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:      October 22, 2008 |   | By: /s/Lynne      Hohlfeld                                               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                        |   | Lynne      Hohlfeld                                                      |   |
|   |                        |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting      Officer  |   |
§ 310.30 Under what circumstances would FFP be suspended or disallowed in the costs of Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems? ( a ) *Suspension of APD approval.* OCSE will suspend approval of the APD for a Computerized Tribal IV-D System approved under this part as of the date that the system ceases to comply substantially with the criteria, requirements, and other provisions of the APD. OCSE will notify a Tribal IV-D agency in writing in a notice of suspension, with such suspension effective as of the date on which there is no longer substantial compliance.
( b ) *Suspension of FFP.* If OCSE suspends approval of an APD in accordance with this part during the installation, operation, or enhancement of a Computerized Tribal IV-D System, FFP will not be available in any expenditure incurred under the APD after the date of the suspension until the date OCSE determines that the comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency has taken the actions specified in the notice of suspension described in paragraph (a) of this section. OCSE will notify the comprehensive Tribal IV-D agency in writing upon making such a determination.
#### § 301.0 Scope and applicability of this part.

This part deals with the administration of title IV-D of the Social Security Act by the Federal Government including actions on the State plan and amendments thereto and review of such actions; grants under the approved plan; review and audit of State and local expenditures; and reconsideration of disallowances of expenditures for Federal financial participation.