AFS-11-357-E 

August 29, 2011 

 Exemption No. 9826A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-14105 

Mr. Michael S. Friedman 

24941 Castleton Drive 

Chantilly, VA 20152 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 9826. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 16, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for 

an extension of Exemption No. 9826. That exemption from § 91.109(a) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations allows you to conduct certain flight instruction and simulated instrument 

flights to meet the recent experience requirements in Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and Travel 

Air airplanes equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9826 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations

1. Operations under this exemption are limited to flights for completion of the flight 

review required by § 61.56 and for accomplishing recency of experience as 

required by § 61.57. 

2. Operations under this exemption are limited to Beechcraft Bonanza, Baron, and 

Travel Air aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel and 

operable rudder pedals, in lieu of functioning dual controls. 

3. The pilot manipulating the controls under the terms of this exemption must be 

qualified in every respect to serve as pilot in command (PIC) of the airplane 

during the entire flight. While operating under this exemption, the pilot seated in 

the left seat must at all times serve as and remain PIC as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. 

The PIC must agree to the provisions of this exemption. 

4. While serving as flight instructor under the terms of this exemption, Mr. Friedman 

must: 

a. Notwithstanding paragraph 4b below, be otherwise fully qualified to serve as 

PIC and flight instructor in the airplane involved, as required by 14 CFR 

 § 65.195(b) and (f); and 

b. Have given at least 25 hours of dual instruction in the airplane involved. 

5. Mr. Friedman, when serving as the flight instructor under the conditions of this 

exemption, and the PIC must agree that the proposed flight, under the conditions 

in evidence at the time of proposed flight, can be conducted safely. 
 3

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9826 to February 28, 2013, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9826 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9826. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service