alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132649 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, J. EDWARD KLOIAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132649 

 COA: 267033 

Wayne CC: 05-514737-NM

MICHAEL ALAN SCHWARTZ and 

SCHWARTZ, KELLY & 

OLTARZ-SCHWARTZ, P.C.,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0425 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 2, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 10.14


 


Garry McHenry


1919 NE 19th Street Suite 302


Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33311


 


June 7th 2019


 


To Board of Directors,


 


As of June 7th 2019 I here by resign my
position with MCTC Holdings, Inc. (the “company”).


 


This resignation is not the result of any
disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operation, policies or practices.


 


Respectively,


 


	/s/ Garry McHenry	 
	Garry McHenry
S TEVE M ORRISSEY

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

— I NTERNATIONAL & R EGULATORY A FFAIRS (202) 296

- 2 733

( 202 ) 296

- 28 73 FAX

STEVE

. MORRISSEY @ UNITED

. COM

August 31, 2010

Paul L. Gretch

Director , Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Indefinite Renewal of Blanket Route Integration Authority

Docket DOT

- OST

- 200 5

- 22228

Dear Mr. Gretch :

Pursuant to the Department’s notice on August 27, United Air Lines, Inc.

(“United”) hereby advises that it wishes to renew for an indefinite term its certificate for

blanket route integration authority, which was issued in the above

- referenced docket on

January 3, 2006 and scheduled to expire on March 6 , 2011

. By this timely filed request

for renewal, United relies on the automatic extension provisions of 5 USC §558(c), as

implemented by 14 CFR Part 377, to continue in effect its existing authority pending

final action on this reques t.

Respectful ly submitted

,

Steve Morrissey

Managing Director , International &

Regulatory Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

c c: Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Ms. Thuy CooperCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a c opy of the foregoing document on

all persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

byerlyjr@state.gov

carl.nelson@aa.com

charters@evergreenaviation.com

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com

d wight.moore@ustranscom.mil

efaberman@wileyrein.com

hkamen@coair.com

howard_kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

john.allen@faa.gov

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

ldwasko@erols.com matwood@sherblackwell.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

mroller@rollerbauer.com

msinick@ssd.com

nssparks@fedex.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

rober t.land@jetblue.com

ronald.williams@ustranscom.mil

rpommer@atlasair.com

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

slachter@lachter

- clements.com

tom.fosko@airtransport.cc

yrose@cargoair.org

Annalei Avanceña

Advisor

— Regulatory Affairs

Dated: August 31, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Classic
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         (i)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
                  30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
                  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 19, 2002            /s/ Dale Bennett
        ---------------            ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Dale Bennett
                                          --------------------------------------
                                   Title: Chief Operating Officer and President
                                          --------------------------------------



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
**MARKETWATCH.COM, INC.**
CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of MarketWatch.com, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2003 (the"Report"), I, Lawrence S. Kramer, the Chief Executive Officer****of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the bestof my knowledge:

	(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

	(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany at the dates and for the periods indicated therein.  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, ackonwledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears intyped form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed"with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2003
By:	/s/ Lawrence S. Kramer    Lawrence S. Kramer, Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 46

#### Editorial Note:

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

#### § 46.121 [Reserved]
#### § 287.100 Must a Tribe that operates both NEW and Tribal TANF programs submit two separate plans?

Yes. Separate plans are needed to reflect different program and plan requirements as specified in the statute and in plan guidance documents issued by the Secretary for each program.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IVORY JENKINS,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 409, 2017

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1607011213 (K)

§

§

§

§

Submitted: March 28, 2018

Decided: April 5, 2018

ORDER

This 5th day of April 2018, it appears to the Court that, on March 15, 2018, 

the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant to show cause why 

this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and 

appendix on or before the March 5, 2018 deadline. The appellant has not responded 

to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period and has not filed his 

opening brief and appendix. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be 

unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Editorial Note on Part 304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 304.26 Determination of Federal share of collections. ( a ) From the amounts of support collected by the State and retained as reimbursement for title IV-A payments and foster care maintenance payments under title IV-E, the State shall reimburse the Federal government the Federal share of the support collections. In computing the Federal share of support collections for assistance payments made under titles IV-A and IV-E, the State shall use the Federal medical assistance percentage in effect for the fiscal year in which the amount is distributed. The Federal medical assistance percentage is: ( 1 ) 75 percent for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa for the distribution of retained IV-A collections; 55 percent for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa for the distribution of retained IV-E collections; 70 percent for the District of Columbia for the distribution of retained IV-E collections; and
( 2 ) As defined in section 1905(b) of the Act as in effect on September 30, 1995, for any other State.
( b ) [Reserved]
[64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999, as amended at 68 FR 25305, May 12, 2003; 81 FR 93568, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### § 3.26 Speed limit.

The speed limit is 25 miles per hour, unless otherwise posted. A driver of a vehicle may not exceed the speed limit.
SERVED: MARCH 2, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JENNIFER LAUREN DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-3318 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2014S0275046) has been assignedto Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Ronnie A. Y Her ChiefAdministrative aw Judge Attachment
- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1



### Jennifer Lauren, Respondent 6286 N VentanaViewPlace Tucson, AZ 85750-0706 Troy A. Rolf, Respondent's Counsel ONE COPY



### 700 Twelve Oaks Center Drive, Suite 700 Wayzata, MN 55391 Brandon C. Goldberg, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200**F~:** 

### 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 F**~:** 

### 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-3318 (Civil Penalty Action)

Jennifer Lauren, Respondent 35 E 63rd Street, Apt 3C NewYork, New York 10065

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOQO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Exhibit 12.3
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:

/s/ Rajagopal Kishore KumarName:
    Rajagopal Kishore KumarTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
```

[109th Congress Public Law 251]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ251.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 654]]

Public Law 109-251
109th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                      1, 2006 -  [H.J. Res. 86]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    Section 9(b)(3) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003 
(Public Law 108-61; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ``three 
years'' and inserting ``six years''.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 50 USC 1701 note.>> RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER 
            BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    (a) In General.--Congress approves the renewal of import 
restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and 
Democracy Act of 2003.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--This joint resolution shall be deemed to 
be a ``renewal resolution'' for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese 
Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 3. <<NOTE: 50 USC 1701 note.>> EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of the enactment of this Act or July 26, 2006, whichever occurs 
first.

    Approved August 1, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 86:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 11, considered and passed House.
            July 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 162.404 Compliance dates of the implementation of the standard unique health identifier for health care providers. ( a ) *Health care providers.* A covered health care provider must comply with the implementation specifications in § 162.410 no later than May 23, 2007.
( b ) *Health plans.* A health plan must comply with the implementation specifications in § 162.412 no later than one of the following dates: ( 1 ) A health plan that is not a small health plan—May 23, 2007.
( 2 ) A small health plan—May 23, 2008.
( c ) *Health care clearinghouses.* A health care clearinghouse must comply with the implementation specifications in § 162.414 no later than May 23, 2007.
[69 FR 3468, Jan. 23, 2004, as amended at 77 FR 54719, Sept. 5, 2012]
#### § 309.165 What recourse does a Tribe or Tribal organization have to dispute a determination to disallow Tribal IV-D program expenditures?

If a Tribe or Tribal organization disputes a decision to disallow Tribal IV-D program expenditures, the grant appeals procedures outlined in 45 CFR part 16 are applicable.
§ 1640.2 Applicable federal laws. ( a ) LSC will maintain an exhaustive list of applicable Federal laws relating to the proper use of Federal funds on its Web site and provide recipients with a link to the list in the contractual agreement. The list may be modified with the approval of the Corporation's Board of Directors at a public meeting. LSC will provide recipients with notice when the list is modified.
( b ) For the purposes of this part and the laws referenced in paragraph (a) of this section, LSC is considered a Federal agency and a recipient's LSC funds are considered Federal funds provided by grant or contract.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.206 Research involving, after delivery, the placenta, the dead fetus or fetal material. ( a ) Research involving, after delivery, the placenta; the dead fetus; macerated fetal material; or cells, tissue, or organs excised from a dead fetus, shall be conducted only in accord with any applicable Federal, State, or local laws and regulations regarding such activities.
( b ) If information associated with material described in paragraph (a) of this section is recorded for research purposes in a manner that living individuals can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to those individuals, those individuals are research subjects and all pertinent subparts of this part are applicable.
#### The People of the State, of New York ex-rel. Leonard Drake, Respondent, v. William S. Andrews, as Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Appellants.

Appeal — order of Appellate Division should show reversal to be on the law.

To render a review by the Court of Appeals effective, an order of the Appellate Division reversing an order adjudging one guilty of criminal contempt should show on its face that the reversal was solely on the law Reported below, 134 App. Div. 32.

(Argued October 8, 1909 ;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 6,1909, which reversed an order of the court at a Trial Term adjudging relator guilty of criminal contempt.

*539
      *Emerson M. Willis*for appellants.

*William Townsend*for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

However clear our judgment may be on the legal question involved on this appeal we think that the order of the Appellate Division in its present form is not the subject of review by us. This view is not predicated on the decision of this court in *People ex rel. N. Y. Society, etc.,*v. *Gilmore*(88 N. Y. 626), because since that decision the Code of Criminal Procedure (§ 519) has been amended so as to authorize appeals to this court from a final determination affecting a substantial right of defendant, but because there is a question of fact in the case. To render a review by this court effective the order of the Appellate Division should show on its face that the order of the trial court was reversed solely on the law.

The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed unless the appellants within thirty days obtain from the Appellate Division a modification of its order, so as to show that the order of the trial court was reversed solely on the law, and in case of such modification being made the appeal may be again submitted to this court without further argument, unless the parties otherwise elect.

Cullen, Ch„ J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, IIisoock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.
# ^*i a nC^^ ->\RTMbN TO F ^ ^ -.NSPORWiO N \A/W W. aeS s . co m- -i,--.

- i'^nrTiiiiTI'"~i" 0 

# cBc r^c r

/ai ! :.F P - ! AR : 2 5 Augus t 3 , 201 1 Aloh aLey Associat e Director , X-5 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 7t h Street , SW , Roo m640 1 Washington , D C 2059 0 R £ : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t Applicatio n Docke t OST-2011-011 9 Gran dFork s Regiona l Airpor t Authority/Cit y o f

Gran dForks , Nort hDakot a Dear Ms . Ley : Advance dEngineerin g an dEnvironmenta l Services , Inc . (AE2S ) i s an engineerin g consultin g fir mwith 1 1 office s acros s NorthDakota , Minnesota , an dMontana, includin g ou r corporat e offic e i n Gran dForks , Nort hDakota . W e ar e frequent user s o f th e Gran dFork s Internationa l Airport , an dw e strongl y support th e abov e reference dgran t application . Th e propose dpla n b y th e Gran dFork s Regiona l Airpor t Authorit y an dth e Cit y o f Gran dFork s for

th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t woul d mee t th e need s fo r

additiona l ai r

trave l option s fo r

ou r busines s an dothe r

businesse s i n th e Gran dFork s community . Commercia l ai r

servic e i s vitall y importan t t o ou r business . W e believ e ther e i s astron g nee dfor \ additiona l ai r

servic e t o th e community , i n particular th e additio n o f

servic e t o provid e direc t

wes t boun d| trave l options , rathe r

tha n havin g t o connec t

i n Minneapoli s t o trave l t o an y western destinations . j I als o serv e a s th e Chai r

o f th e Gran dFork s Regio n Economi c Developmen t Corporation . Th e futur e / additio n o f

ane w commercia l ai r

carrie r i s criticall y importan t

t o th e healthan dgrowt ho f th e Gran d; / Fork s busines s community . Th e contemplate dimprovement s wil l provid e asignifican t boos t t o economi c developmen t

in ou r community . You r support o f thi s gran t

applicatio n i s greatly appreciated . Sincerely , AE2 S

Stev e L . Burian , P E Chie f Executiv e Office r

Advance d Engineerin g an d Environmenta l Services , Inc . 405 0 Garde

n Vie wDriv e Suit e 20 0 • Gran

d Forks , N O 5820 1 • (t

) 70 1 -746-808 7 • (f

) 70 1 -746-037 0