alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1700.5 Executive Director. ( a ) The Executive Director serves as the administrative and technical head of the Commission staff, directly responsible for managing its day-to-day operations and assuring that Commission operations conform to all applicable Federal laws.
( b ) The Executive Director is directly responsible to the Commission, works under the general direction of the Chairperson, and assists the Chairperson in carrying out the Commission's organizational and administrative responsibilities.
( c ) The Executive Director acts as the principal staff advisor to the Chairperson and Commissioners, participating with the Commissioners in the development, recommendation and implementation of overall plans and policies to achieve the Commission's goals.
( d ) To facilitate its work, the Commission from time to time delegates to the Executive Director various duties and responsibilities.
( e ) The Commission records formal delegation of the duties and responsibilities referred to in paragraph (d) of this section in resolutions and in the minutes of its meetings.
( f ) The Executive Director may delegate the duties and responsibilities referred to in paragraph (d) of this section, as necessary, to other members of the Commission staff.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of a ground hydrology model suitable for global climate modeling using soil morphology and vegetation cover, and an evaluation of remotely sensed informationThe long-term purpose was to contribute to scientific understanding of the role of the planet's land surfaces in modulating the flows of energy and matter which influence the climate, and to quantify and monitor human-induced changes to the land environment that may affect global climate. Highlights of the effort include the following: production of geo-coded, digitized World Soil Data file for use with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) climate model; contribution to the development of a numerical physically-based model of ground hydrology; and assessment of the utility of remote sensing for providing data on hydrologically significant land surface variables.Document ID19890004450Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsZobler, L.*(Columbia Univ. New York, NY, United States)*Lewis, R.*(Columbia Univ. New York, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 26, 1988Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-180463NAS 1.26:180463Accession Number89N13821Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC5-32Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890004450.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
| 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Dated:      November 12, 2008 | /s/      Christopher J.      LeClerc                                          |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Christopher      J. LeClerc, Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting      and financial officer)                                                                                                                                                                                     |
#### Patrick H. McGratty et al., Appellants, *v.*Frederick Haberman, Respondent.

*McGratty*v. *Haberman,*137 App. Div. 199, affirmed.

(Argued November 19, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment entered June 15, 1908, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, overruling plaintiff’s exceptions *512ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant on a nonsuit at the Trial Term in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due for labor performed and materials furnished.

*William F. Clare*for appellants.

*Abraham Benedict*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cüllen, Cb. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
bin/forms/C00502229/1587955 

 

 

 

Re:ȱȱȱ Weber for Congress; Response to Interim Audit Report

Dear Mr. Fonseca,ȱȱ

On behalf of our client Weber for Congress (“WFC”), this letter responds to the

following points raised in the Audit Division’s Interim Audit Report (“IAR”):

Finding 1: Misstatement of Financial Activity

WFC has filed a Form 991 addressing the inadvertent misreporting of certain

transactions reflected in Schedule A and Lines 11(c), 14, 15, 17, 20(a), and 21 of Form 3 reports

covered by the audit period.ȱȱ

Based on these corrected transaction entries and Form 3 line items, the Form 99 also

corrects WFC’s cash on hand during the 2019Ȭ2020 audit period by a net amount of

$108,719.53 (which matches almost exactly the $108,650 cash on hand discrepancy the IAR

noted).

1 https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00502229/1587954 and https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-



VIA EȬMAILȱȱ

April 18, 2022

Mr. Jonathan Fonseca

Federal Election Commission, Audit Division

1050 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20463

CHRIS K. GOBER 

PO BOX 341016 

AUSTIN, TX 78734 

512.354.1783 DIRECT 

CG@GOBERGROUP.COM 
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

APRIL 18, 2022

PAGE 2 OF 2

Finding 2: Receipt of Contributions in Apparent Excess of Limitations

As the IAR notes, “WFC has materially resolved the excessive contributions [covered

by Finding 2], albeit untimely,” by issuing presumptive redesignation letters in response to

the audit exit conference.

WFC has no further comments on this finding.

Finding 3: Failure to File 48ȬHour Notices

As WFC stated in its December 21, 2021 response to the audit exit conference, WFC

generally does not dispute that it inadvertently did not file 48Ȭhour notices for certain

contributions.

WFC’s December 21, 2021 response also addressed a $2,800 contribution from Joseph

B. Swinbank, which was timely reported by WFC on a 48Ȭhour notice filed on February 20,

2020. As WFC noted in its prior response, the date of receipt for this contribution had been

inadvertently misreported. WFC has corrected the date of receipt for the contribution on the

same Form 99 mentioned above in reference to Finding 1.

* * *

Please do not hesitate to contact us should the Audit Division need any additional

information or documentation in connection with this audit.

Sincerely,ȱȱ

Chris K. Goberȱȱ

Eric Wang

Counsel to Weber for Congress
§ 601.3 Security program. The Director, Division of Administrative Services, is responsible for conducting a security program that ensures effective implementation of Executive Order 12958, to include: ( a ) Maintaining active training and orientation programs for employees concerned with classified information or material.
( b ) Encouraging Foundation personnel to challenge those classification decisions they believe to be improper.
( c ) Issuing directives that ensure classified information is used, processed, stored, reproduced and transmitted only under conditions that will provide adequate protection and prevent access by unauthorized persons.
( d ) Recommending to the Director appropriate administrative action to correct abuse or violation of any provision of these regulations, including notification by warning letters, formal reprimand, and to the extent permitted by law, suspension without pay and removal.
[47 FR 57284, Dec. 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 51021, Sept. 30, 1996]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1733 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit 

against income tax for the cost of passports and other enhanced identification documents required to comply with the June 1, 2009, implementation of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Mr. LEE of New York (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS, and Mr. MCHUGH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

refundable credit against income tax for the cost of passports and other enhanced identification documents required to comply with the June 1, 2009, implementation 

of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Fee Relief 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1733 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR COST OF PASSPORTS 

2 AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO 

3 COMPLY WITH WESTERN HEMISPHERE TRAV4 EL INITIATIVE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of sub6 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

7 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by insert8 ing after section 36A the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 36B. TRAVEL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO COMPLY 

10 WITH WESTERN HEMISPHERE TRAVEL INI11 TIATIVE. 

12 ‘‘In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed 

13 as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle for 

14 the taxable year an amount equal to the cost paid or in15 curred by the taxpayer to obtain any travel document— 

16 ‘‘(1) which complies with the plan developed 

17 under section 7209(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform 

18 and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, and 

19 ‘‘(2) which is for the identification of the tax20 payer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or any dependent of 

21 the taxpayer with respect to whom the taxpayer is 

22 allowed a deduction under section 151.’’. 

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

24 (1) Section 1324(b)(2) of title 31, United 

25 States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘36B,’’ after 

26 ‘‘36A,’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1733 IH

1 (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part 

2 IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is 

3 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec4 tion 36A the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 36B. Travel documents required to comply with Western Hemisphere 

Travel Initiative.’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7229

STANLEY WILSON CRUSENBERRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-01-271-7)

Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 28, 2001

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Wilson Crusenberry, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Wilson Crusenberry appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Crusenberry v. Angelone,

No. CA-01-271-7 (W.D. Va. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NO. 07-06-0366-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY

23, 2007

______________________________ CARLOS A.L. VAUGHN, APPELLANT

V. BRUCE ZELLER , JOE NUNN AND KATHY SKINNER, APP ELLEES

_________________________________ FROM THE 320 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 092479-00-D ; HONORABLE DON EMERSO N, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Carlo s A.L. Vaughn fil ed a notice of appeal from a summary j udgment in favor of appellees. The trial cour t clerk’s record was filed on November 3, 2006. By letter dated December

20, 2006, the clerk of this court notified Va ughn that appellant’s brief was due December 4, 2006, but had yet to be filed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6(a), 38. 8. The letter further advi sed Vau ghn th at the a ppeal w ould be subje ct to d ismi ssal for want of prosecution if the brief, or a response rea sonably explaini ng the failure to file a brief with2

a showing that appellees had not been injur ed by the dela y, was

not filed b y Januar

y 2, 2007. No brief, mot ion for extens ion or other r esponse has been r

eceived. Acco rdin gly, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply w ith a direct ive of the cour t. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), ( c).
James T. Campbell Justice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1821

VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; LORETTA LYNCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:18-ct-03014-D)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing 

his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Perkins v. Ashcroft, No. 5:18-

ct-03014-D (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 2554.5 What is a false claim or statement? ( a ) A claim submitted to the Corporation is a “false” claim if the person making the claim, or causing the claim to be made, knows or has reason to know that the claim: ( 1 ) Is false, fictitious or fraudulent;
( 2 ) Includes or is supported by a written statement which asserts or contains a material fact which is false, fictitious, or fraudulent;
( 3 ) Includes or is supported by a written statement which is false, fictitious or fraudulent because it omits a material fact that the person making the statement has a duty to include in the statement; or
( 4 ) Is for payment for the provision of property or services which the person has not provided as claimed.
( b ) A statement submitted to the Corporation is a false statement if the person making the statement, or causing the statement to be made, knows or has reason to know that the statement: ( 1 ) Asserts a material fact which is false, fictitious, or fraudulent; or
( 2 ) Is false, fictitious, or fraudulent because it omits a material fact that the person making the statement has a duty to include in the statement. In addition, the statement must contain or be accompanied by an express certification or affirmation of the truthfulness and accuracy of the contents of the statement.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 10 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 35
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 10

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 
         Affairs relating to ``Reproductive Health Services''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2023

    Mr. Tuberville (for himself, Mr. Lankford, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. 
Sullivan, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Scott of 
Florida, Mr. Thune, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
 Mullin, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Lee, Mr. Braun, Mrs. 
Britt, Mr. Vance, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Cassidy, Mrs. Blackburn, 
 Mr. Moran, Mr. Budd, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Daines, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Grassley, 
 Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Graham, Mr. Ricketts, and 
 Mr. Young) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

                             April 18, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 
         Affairs relating to ``Reproductive Health Services''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to 
``Reproductive Health Services'' (87 Fed. Reg. 55287; published 
September 9, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                                                        Calendar No. 35

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 10

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 
         Affairs relating to ``Reproductive Health Services''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 18, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1112 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MACEDONIA 

Signed at Skopje June 30, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MACEDONIA 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Skopje June 30, 2003; 

 Entered into force November 12, 2003.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-977]



[[Page 5676]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning indviduals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel; Biotechnology SEP.
    Date: February 23, 2006.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Guo Zhang, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 1064, Bethesda, MD 20892-796. 301-435-0812. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12687a737c757567527f737b7e3c7c7b7a3c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e44565f5059594b7e535f57521050575610595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure; 93.306, 93.333, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 26, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-977 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Annie Fair.

Order affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.