alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1639 

To amend the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization 

Act of 2003 to extend Federal reimbursement of emergency health services furnished to undocumented aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Ms. GIFFORDS (for herself, Mr. REYES, Mr. BACA, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. 

BILBRAY, and Mr. ORTIZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 

and Modernization Act of 2003 to extend Federal reimbursement of emergency health services furnished to undocumented aliens. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Health Care 

5 Relief Act of 2009’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1639 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT OF 

2 EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED 

3 TO UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. 

4 Section 1011(a)(1) of the Medicare Prescription 

5 Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395dd note) is amended by striking ‘‘2008’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘2012’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-716.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL PROPERTY 

 Memorandum of Understanding between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CYPRUS 

Signed at Washington July 16, 2002 

 and 

Agreement Amending the 

Memorandum of Understanding 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Washington 

August 17, 2006 

 and 

Agreement Amending the 

Memorandum of Understanding 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Washington 

July 3 and 6, 2007 

 with 

Attachment 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CYPRUS 

Cultural Property 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at Washington July 16, 2002; 

 Entered into force July 16, 2002. 

 And agreement amending the memorandum of understanding. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington August 17, 2006; 

 Entered into force August 17, 2006. 

 And agreement amending the memorandum of understanding. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington July 3 and 6, 2007; 

 Entered into force July 6, 2007; 

 With effect from July 16, 2007. 

 With attachment.
Order filed December 9, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00722-CV

____________

LINDA HOLMAN, Appellant

V.

PLUM CREEK TOWNHOUSES, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1050343

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 4, 2014. To date, the 

filing fee of $195.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established 

indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before December 22, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
From: Jill Stem for President <lnfb@jlllsteln.org> 

To: "StithorTias@fBC.gov" <SHThomas@fiBC.gov>, 

Date: 06/30/2014 03:05 PM 

Subject: Re: Jill Stein for President PAR 

Hi Sheraline, 

My apologies, I thought the email had sent on the 20th! 

Jill Stein for President's Response: 

Finding #2: Misstatement of Financial Activity 

Due to complications caused by the campaign's initial bookkeeper, initial filings lacked certain 

records and duplicated various expenditures. Upon the onset of the field audit, the Campaign'was 

able to identify shortcomings related to this finding and made necessary corrections with the 

assistance of Audit Division. 

Finding #3: Disclosure of Debts and Obligations 

During the course of fieldwork, the Campaign was able to identify various debts and obligations 

that were previously unreported due to mistakes from the initial bookkeeper. To date, these 

mistakes have been corrected in filings submitted on June 20th, 2014. 

Finding #4: Reporting of Receipts 

In utilizing FECFile for filing reports, the Campaign discovered issues with Import functions 

where donor information would not be recognized as a potential duplicate, causing various donor 

aggregates to be inaccurate in final reports. However, due to the Campaign's internal controls and 

data management, no donors were allowed to exceed contribution limits. To date, these issues 

have been corrected. 

Finding #5: Reporting of Expenditures 

After receiving clarification from Audit Division and Reports Analysis Division, the Campaign 

was able to identify expenditures lacking proper itemization or inadequate descriptions. To date, 

these errors have been corrected. 

Finding #6: Itemization of Candidate Loans 

To date, all issues with itemization of candidate loans have been corrected. 

Sincerely, 

Matt Kozlowski 

Director of Information 

Jill Stein for President
80000

100000120000140000

NO

x

(TONS)

NORTH DAKOTA

POINT SOURCE

NOx EMISSIONS

0

200004000060000

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 

NO

TOTAL UTILITY BOILERS OTHER POINT SOURCES
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the Company) for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, each of Douglas Biles, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Terry Mereniuk, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigneds knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: November 17, 2008 |  | /s/Douglas Biles                       
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|                         |  | Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer 
|                         |  |                                        
|                         |  |                                        
|                         |  |                                        
|                         |  |                                        
|                         |  | /s/Terry Mereniuk                      
|                         |  | Terry Mereniuk, Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)         



---
Belknap Probate Court,

No. 5530.

#### In re Ralph L. Dockham Estate.

Argued December 6, 1966.

Decided March 29, 1967.

*81
      *Nighszvander, Lord & Martin (Mr. William S. Lord*orally) pro se, as administrator.

*George S. Pappagianis,*Attorney General and *R. Peter Shapiro,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mr. Shapiro*orally), for the State.

Duncan, J.

RSA 8:43 provides in part that the “ state is entitled to recover the expense of care, treatment and maintenance of any patient or inmate at [the New Hampshire Hospital] . . . from the patient or inmate ... or his estate . . . .” Provisions added in 1965 relate to recovery of the expense of care of inmates at the Laconia State School. Laws 1965, *c.*16; RSA 8:43 (supp).

RSA 556:3 (supp) provides that no action against an administrator shall be sustained “ unless the demand was exhibited to the administrator within six months after the original, grant of administration . . . .” The issue presented is whether the claim of the State is barred by reason of this provision. We hold that it is.

In *Reconstruction*&c. *Corp.*v. *Faulkner,*100 N. H. 192, 193 we referred to the “ deep rooted principle . . . that time does not run against the federal or a state government, ” and held that the plaintiff in that case, as an agency of the federal government, was immune from the operation of RSA 556:1, 3. At the same time, we pointed out that the statute is a “ nonclaim statute ” the purpose of which is to secure the orderly and expeditious settlement of estates. In the annotation in 34 A.L.R. 2d 1003, 1008-9, it is said that a slight preponderance of the authority upon the subject holds that such nonclaim statutes apply to claims by a State or its subdivisions. In the view so taken, nonclaim statutes are to be distinguished from general statutes of limitation, since they operate to extinguish a claim, while general limitations serve merely to bar the remedy. *Reith*v. *County of Mountrail,*(N.D.) 104 N. W. 2d 667.

Here the State seeks to enforce a statutory right, and in order to do so seeks to avoid compliance with its own substantive law prescribing the prerequisites to enforcement of such a right. *Bahr*v. *Zahm,*219 Ind. 297. The policy which favors the expeditious settlement of estates was fortified by recent legislation, materially shortening the periods within which claims are required to be presented and sued upon. Laws 1959, 114:1, 3, 4; RSA 556:1, 3, 5, 7 (supp). See *Sullivan*v. *Marshall,*93 N. H. 456; *Frost*
      *82v. *Frost,*100 N. H. 326, 328. The general principle that the State is immune from the consequences of the lapse of time where general limitations are concerned is not to be extended in derogation of specific statutory requirements adopted to expedite the settlement of estates. See *Gossler*v. *Manchester,*107 N. H. 310; *In re Estate of Bird,*410 Ill. 390, 395; *State*v. *Moore's Estate,*(Fla.) 153 So. 2d 819. See *State*v. *Stafford Company,*99 N. H. 92, 97; *State*v. *Company*49 N. H. 240, 254.

The question certified by the probate court is answered in the affirmative.

*Remanded.*

Blandin, J., sat at argument but took no part in the decision; the others concurred!
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 55 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 55

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2024

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 22-58, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on January 10, 2024: 28-Meter Patrol Craft 
        Kits and related equipment.
                                 <all>
```
```

[111th Congress Public Law 279]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2902]]

Public Law 111-279
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Tom Bradley 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2010 -  [H.R. 5450]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TOM BRADLEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tom Bradley Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tom Bradley 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 13, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5450:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            July 14, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hans Ephraimson, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of PowerShares DB US Dollar
Index Bullish Fund (the Fund), a series of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 25, 2010 |  | /s/ Hans Ephraimson    
|                     |  | Hans Ephraimson        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
§ 401.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part a *Cuban and Haitian entrant* or *entrant* is defined as: ( a ) Any individual granted parole status as a Cuban/Haitian Entrant (Status Pending) or granted any other special status subsequently established under the immigration laws for nationals of Cuba or Haiti, regardless of the status of the individual at the time assistance or services are provided; and
( b ) Any other national of Cuba or Haiti ( 1 ) Who: ( i ) Was paroled into the United States and has not acquired any other status under the Immigration and Nationality Act;
( ii ) Is the subject of exclusion or deportation proceedings under the Immigration and Nationality Act; or
( iii ) Has an application for asylum pending with the Immigration and Naturalization Service; and
( 2 ) With respect to whom a final, nonappealable, and legally enforceable order of deportation or exclusion has not been entered.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Varsity Group Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30 2007(the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ James M. Craig           
|                       |  | James M. Craig               
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Frank Griffin, Respondent, *v.*William McMahon et al., Respondents, and Martha A. Mallory, Appellant.

Reported below, 131 App. Div. 925.

(Argued October 4, 1909 ;

decided October 12, 1909.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 6, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action for partition of real property.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Ajipeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

*Frank J. Saxton*and *Thomas F. Rogers*for motion.

*Martha A.*Mallory, appellant, in person, opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 2554.20 How are issues brought to the attention of the ALJ? ( a ) All applications to the ALJ for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ shall make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Classic
Cable, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

    (i)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
                  September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 14, 2002             /s/ Jimmie Taylor
        ---------------------         ----------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Jimmie Taylor
                                             ---------------------------------
                                      Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                              --------------------------------



    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
§ 1606.5 Procedures. ( a ) Before any final action is taken under this part, the recipient will be provided notice and an opportunity to be heard as set out in this part.
( b ) Prior to a preliminary determination involving a limited reduction of funding, the Corporation shall designate either the President or another senior Corporation employee to conduct any final review that is requested pursuant to § 1606.10 of this part. The Corporation shall ensure that the person so designated has had no prior involvement in the proceedings under this part so as to meet the criterion set out in § 1606.10(d) of this part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7263

DANIEL SCOTT HARNEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

The Attorney General of the State of Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-

1008-MJG)

Submitted: December 26, 2001 Decided: January 15, 2002

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Scott Harney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Scott Harney seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harney v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1008-MJG

(D. Md. filed July 18, 2001 & entered July 20, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Florida Bank Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert Rothman, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 31, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT ROTHMAN     
|                     |  |     |  | Robert Rothman         
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer