alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Wescorp Energy, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March
31, 2008, each of the undersigned Douglas Biles, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Terry Mereniuk, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigneds knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Dated: May 30, 2008 | /s/
      Douglas Biles 
|------------------- | ------------------------
|                    | Douglas Biles           
|                    | Chief Executive Officer 
|                    |                         
|                    |                         
|                    |                         
|Dated: May 30, 2008 | /s/
      Terry Mereniuk
|                    | Terry Mereniuk          
|                    | Chief Financial Officer 

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 11-951 (CKK) 

ORDER 

(August 13, 2013) 

 Upon consideration of the parties’ [21] Stipulation of Dismissal and [22] Joint Motion for 

Order Setting Briefing Schedule, it is, this 13th day of August, 2013, hereby 

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, except as to the 

Plaintiff’s ability to seek attorney’s fees and costs. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ [22] Joint Motion for Order Setting 

Briefing Schedule is GRANTED. The Plaintiff shall file any motion for attorney’s fees and costs 

on or before September 9, 2013. The Defendant shall file its opposition by no later than 

October 10, 2013. The Plaintiff may file a reply in support of its motion on or before 

November 4, 2013. 

SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ 

 COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND 

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

 Defendant. 

Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 23 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 1
§ 400.43 Requirements for documentation of refugee status. ( a ) An applicant for assistance under title IV of the Act must provide proof, in the form of documentation issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), of one of the following statuses under the Act as a condition of eligibility: ( 1 ) Paroled as a refugee or asylee under section 212(d)(5) of the Act;
( 2 ) Admitted as a refugee under section 207 of the Act;
( 3 ) Granted asylum under section 208 of the Act;
( 4 ) Cuban and Haitian entrants, in accordance with requirements in 45 CFR part 401;
( 5 ) Certain Amerasians from Vietnam who are admitted to the U.S. as immigrants pursuant to section 584 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1988 (as contained in section 101(e) of Public Law 100-202 and amended by the 9th proviso under Migration and Refugee Assistance in title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts, 1989 (Public Law 100-461 as amended)); or
( 6 ) Admitted for permanent residence, provided the individual previously held one of the statuses identified above.
( b ) The Director will issue instructions specifying the documentation that applicants for assistance must submit.
[51 FR 3915, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 65 FR 15443, Mar. 22, 2000]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINCTON. D.C. 20463

A83-89

.. "

'"

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY - FEDERAL

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of the Texas

Democratic Party - Federal ("the Committee"), undertaken by the

Audit Division of the Federal Election Commission in accordance

with the Commission's audit policy to determine whether there has

been compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election

Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). The audit was

conducted pursuant to Section 438(b) of Title 2 of the United

States Code which states, in part, that the Commission may conduct audits and field investigations of any political committee required to file a report under Section 434 of this

title. Prior to conducting any audit under this section, the

Commission shall perform an internal review of reports filed by selected committees to determine if the reports filed by a

particular committee meet the threshold requirements for

substantial compliance with the Act.

The Committee registered with the Federal Election

Commission on July 10, 1978 and maintains its headquarters in

Austin, Texas.

The audit covered the period January 1, 1981, through

December 31, 1982. The Committee reported a beginning cash

balance on January 1, 1981 of $3,413.51; total receipts for the

period of $109,1S0.00J total disbursements for the period of

$104,437.l4J and an ending cash balance on November 29, 1982 of

$8,126.37. 11

11 The Committee did not file the year end 1982 report until

October 25, 1983; however, the financial activity during the

period 11/29/82 through 12/31/82 was not material.
...

"'

;

-2-

This report is based on documents and work papers supporting each of its factual statements. They form part of

the record upon which the Commission based its decisions on the

matters in this report and were available to Commissioners and

appropriate staff for review.

B. Key Personnel

The Treasurers of the Committee during the period covered by the audit were Mr. Garry Mauro from January 1, 1981

through October 12, 1982J and Mr. Bob Slagle from October 12,

1982 until the present.

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts and disbursements and individual transactions;

review of required supporting documentation, analysis of

Committee debts and obligationsJ and such other audit procedures

as deemed necessary under the circumstances.

II. Finding and Recommendation

Based upon examination of the reports and statements filed

and the records presented by the Committee, no material problems in complying with the Federal Election Campaign Act were

discovered during the course of the audit.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Jade Art Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Huacai Song,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
17, 2010





/s/
      Huacai SongHuacai
      Song, Principal Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of HC Innovations, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, R. Scott Walker, Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Annual
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

|                      |                         
|--------------------- | ------------------------
|Date: March
 26, 2009 | By: /s/ R.
 Scott Walker
|                      | R. Scott
 Walker        
|                      | Chief
 Financial Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Amendment No.1 to Form 10-K of Jade Art
Group Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Chenqing Luo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
July 9, 2010





/s/
      Chenqing LuoChenqing
      Luo, Principal Financial and
                  Accounting
      Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 05, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 05, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0345. IN THE INTEREST OF M. T. S. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2300384 2300385
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Joan P. Platt, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof MarketWatch.com, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 14, 2003
By:	/s/ Joan P. Platt    Joan P. Platt, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First Place Financial Corp. (First Place) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive
Officer of First Place, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Place.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|February 8, 2005 |  | /s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|                 |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 260.20 What is the purpose of the TANF program? The TANF program has the following four purposes: ( a ) Provide assistance to needy families so that children may be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of relatives;
( b ) End the dependence of needy parents on government benefits by promoting job preparation, work, and marriage;
( c ) Prevent and reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies and establish annual numerical goals for preventing and reducing the incidence of these pregnancies; and
( d ) Encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60232

Summary Calendar

 

MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ-RUIZ, also known as

Miguel Angel Ruiz,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A75 224 615

--------------------

December 16, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Angel Ruiz-Ruiz petitions this court for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the

Immigration Judge’s order denying Ruiz’ application for

cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1) and

dismissing his appeal. Ruiz contends that the BIA erred by not

considering factors relevant to whether he satisfied the
No. 02-60232

-2-

“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” requirement of

8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). 

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility

Act’s (IIRIRA) restrictions on judicial review apply to cases in

which removal proceedings were commenced on or after April 1,

1997, the effective date of the IIRIRA. See DeLeon-Holguin v.

Ashcroft, 253 F.3d 811, 813 (5th Cir. 2001). Under the IIRIRA,

we lack subject matter jurisdiction to review claims for

discretionary relief, such as cancellation of removal. See

8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Eyoum v. INS, 125 F.3d 889, 891

(5th Cir. 1997). Because Ruiz’ case was commenced in June 1997,

after the effective date of the IIRIRA, we lack subject matter

jurisdiction over this appeal. 

 The petition for review is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 15

- BG

- 634

IN RE: ROBERT L. SHIELDS, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 463074 BDN: 57

- 15

BEFORE: Easterly, Associate Judge, and Pryor and Terry, Senior Judges.

ORDER (FILED

- October 15, 2015)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney

Grievance Com m ’n of Maryland v. Shields , 109 A.3d 664 (Md. 2015), this cour t’s July 1, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file

either a res ponse to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Robert L. Shields is hereby disbarred from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010 ), and

In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s peri od of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).

PER CURIAM.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B R ADLEY WARREN PUGH, Pe titione r - Appe lla nt, v. C OM M ISSIONER

OF INTER

NAL R EVENUE, R

e sponde n t - Appe lle e . No. 13-70565

Ta x C t. No. 1126-12 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

a De c ision of the Unite d Stat e s Tax C ourt Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. B ra dle y W arre n Pugh a ppe a ls pro se from

the Ta x C ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in Pugh’ s a c tion c ha lle nging a fe de ra l taxlie n. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 26 U.S.C . § 7482. W e re vie wde novo, Gladde n v . C omm’r , 262 F.3d 851, 853 (9th C i r. 2001), a

nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED DEC 4 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).The Ta x C ourt prope rly gran te d sum

m ary judgm e nt be c a

u se Pugh fa ile d to ra ise a ge nuine disputeof m a t e ria l fa c t a s to whe t he r he ha d pa id his outsta nding tax pe na ltie s, whic h we re im pose d a fte r he file d a

frivolous ta

x re turn. S

e e 26 U.S.C . § 6702 (im

posing pe na ltie s for filing frivolous ta xre t urns); Park

inson v . C omm’r , 647 F.2d 875, 876 (9th C ir. 1981) (pe r c uriam ) (sta ting sum m a ry judgm e nt sta

nda rd unde r Ta x C ourt R

ule 121(d), whic h is de rive d from Fe d. R . C iv. P. 56). W e re je c t a s without me rit Pugh’ s c o nte ntions tha t the Ta x C ourt fa ile d to c re ate a prope r re c ord, e xpre s se d bia s in fa v or of the C om

m issione r, an d c om m itte d othe r proc e dura l e rrors. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 7 0 5 6 5 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Highwater Ethanol, LLC(the “Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JasonR. Fink, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   | /s/ Jason R. Fink             |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Jason  R. Fink, Treasurer     |
|   | Dated:  January 29, 2008 |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40918

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAYMUNDO RAMOS-GARCIA, also known as Raymondo Ramos Garcia, 

also known as Raymundo Ramos Garcia, also known as Raymundo 

RamosGarcia, also known as Dimundo Romos,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:19-CR-799-1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymundo RamosGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos-Garcia has not filed a response. He did, 

however, execute a waiver of any challenge to his conviction; accordingly, we 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 15, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40918 Document: 00515383224 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2020
No. 19-40918

2

conclude that his conviction is not before us and will not address it further. See 

United States v. Polanco-Ozorto, 772 F.3d 1053, 1055 (5th Cir. 2014)

(“Accordingly, we will not address the issues raised in Polanco-Ozorto’s 

response [to his attorney’s Anders brief] related to his plea and conviction.”);

United States v. Garcia, 483 F.3d 289, 290-91 (5th Cir. 2007). With respect to 

his sentence, he has been released from incarceration and has no term of 

supervised release such that any challenge to his sentence is moot, see Spencer 

v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein. The APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

 Case: 19-40918 Document: 00515383224 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2020