alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 411.52 Grievances. ( a ) The care provider facility must implement written policies and procedures for identifying and handling time-sensitive grievances that involve an immediate threat to UC health, safety, or welfare related to sexual abuse and sexual harassment. All such grievances must be reported to ORR according to ORR policies and procedures.
( b ) The care provider facility's staff must bring medical emergencies to the immediate attention of proper medical and/or emergency services personnel for further assessment.
( c ) The care provider facility must issue a written decision on the grievance within five days of receipt.
( d ) To prepare a grievance, a UC may obtain assistance from another UC, care provider facility staff, family members, or legal representatives. Care provider facility staff must take reasonable steps to expedite requests for assistance from these other parties.
§ 681.33 How is the case decided? ( a ) The ALJ will issue an initial decision based only on the record. It will contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The ALJ will serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the close of the hearing or, if the filing of post-hearing briefs were permitted, within 90 days after the final post-hearing brief was filed.
( c ) The findings of fact must include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether any one or more of the claims or statements identified in the complaint violate this part; and
( 2 ) If the defendant is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments, considering any mitigating or aggravating factors.
( d ) The initial decision will include a description of the right of a defendant found liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the authority head.
§ 618.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 8, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-20286

_____________________ HORIZON OFFSHORE CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus STOLT OFFSHORE, S.A., Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CV-2086

__________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court in its memorandum and opinion of February 18, 2004. See also Freudensprung v. Offshore Technical Services, Inc. , 379 F.3d 327, 346 (5th Cir. 2004). AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00483

- CV

Rowland MARTIN , Jr., Appellan t

v.

Edward BRAVENEC , and The Law Office of Mcknight and Bravenec, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 07644 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On October 1, 2014, this court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal because appellant failed to provide written proof that he had paid the fees for the preparation of the appellate record

after the trial court entered an order sustaining the contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence, finding that the appellant is not indigent. On October 15, 2014, appellant filed a motion to reinstate or to stay the dismissal, stating that he ha s settled a federal court cas e which will provide him with the funds necessary to pay the fees. We construe appellant’s motion a s a motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.8. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s motion for rehearing, which must be accompanied by written proof that the fees for the preparation of the appellate record have been paid, must be filed no later than November 14, 2014. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
----

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE  OFFICER   PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Report of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),  I, Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer and I, Terry Mereniuk, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| 1.     | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |

| Dated: November 10, 2005 | */s/ Douglas Biles*  |
|--------------------------|----------------------|
|                     |                      |
|                     | Douglas Biles, CEO   |
|                     |                 |
|                     |                 |
|                     | */s/ Terry Mereniuk* |
|                     |                      |
|                     | Terry Mereniuk, CFO  |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of March 12, 2007: 

A Closed Meeting will be held on Monday, March 12, 2007 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) (3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in a closed session. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday, March 12, 2007 will be: 

                    Formal orders of investigation;                           ( print page 10571)    

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

An adjudicatory matter; and 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: March 5, 2007, 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 07-1105 Filed 3-6-07; 11:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer and I, Terry Mereniuk, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 11, 2006 | (signed) Douglas Biles__
|---------------------- | ------------------------
|                       | Douglas Biles, CEO      
|                       |                         
|                       |                         
|                       | (signed) Terry Mereniuk_
|                       | Terry Mereniuk, CFO     

---
§ 309.120 What intergovernmental procedures must a Tribe or Tribal organization include in a Tribal IV-D plan? A Tribe or Tribal organization must specify in its Tribal IV-D plan: ( a ) That the Tribal IV-D agency will extend the full range of services available under its IV-D plan to respond to all requests from, and cooperate with, State and other Tribal IV-D agencies; and
( b ) That the Tribe or Tribal organization will recognize child support orders issued by other Tribes and Tribal organizations, and by States, in accordance with the requirements under the Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act, 28 U.S.C. 1738B.
### NU MBE R 13- 07- 0063 8-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ JE F F R EY

J. WEBB , Ap pe l l an t, v . BRA ND EE N . W EBB, Appe lle e.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On a pp ea l from th e 15 6t h D i str i ct C ou rt of S an P at ri ci o C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ch ief Ju sticeVa lde z an d Ju stice s Ga rza an d Be nav ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam The appel lan t' s b ri ef in t he abov e ca use was due on Dec ember 17, 2007. On Janua ry 30, 2008, the C ler k o f the C our t not ified appel lan t t hat t he br ief had not b een ti mely fil ed and that the ap p e a l was subj ectto dis mis sal for want o f pros ecut ion under Texas Rul e of Appel lat e Procedu re 38.8 (a )( 1) , unl essw it h in t e n d a ys from t he dat e of re cei pt of thisletter , appell ant reas onabl y ex pla ine d the fail ure and the appel lee was not2

si g nific antl y

i nju red b y t h e appel lan t' s fai lure to ti mely fil e a b ri ef. Appel lan t hasnot respo nde d to th is notice. Appe llant ha s failed to eithe r reaso nab ly explain his failure to f ile a br ief, fil e a mot ion for e xtens ion of ti me to file hisbr ief, or fil e hi s b ri ef. T he Cou rt, having consid ered the do cum ent s on f ile and app ellant ’s fa ilure to f ile his brief , is of

the op inion that the app eal should be dism issed. Accordingly , the app eal is DI SM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF PR OSEC UTIO N. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 3 8.8( a) , 42. 3( b)

. PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 17th day

of Apr il , 200 8.
§ 264.74 How will we determine the Contingency Fund MOE level for the annual reconciliation? ( a ) ( 1 ) The Contingency Fund MOE level includes the State's share of expenditures for AFDC benefit payments, administration, and FAMIS; EA; and the JOBS program for FY 1994.
( 2 ) We will use the same data sources and date, i.e., April 28, 1995, that we used to determine the basic MOE levels for FY 1994. We will exclude the State's share of expenditures from the former IV-A child care programs (AFDC/JOBS, Transitional and At-Risk child care) in the calculation.
( b ) We will reduce a State's Contingency Fund MOE level by the same percentage that we reduce the basic MOE level for any fiscal year in which we reduce the State's annual SFAG allocation to provide funding to Tribal grantees operating a Tribal TANF program.
Exhibit 99.1

                  Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002)

         In connection with the filing by Integrated Technology Group (the
"Company") of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2002 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of
his knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.


/s/ H. Scott Holden

H. Scott Holden,
President




/s/ C. Sue Rushing
C. Sue Rushing
Principal Financial Officer


August 14, 2002
Merrimack,

No. 5763.

#### Crandall R. Wallenstein *v.*Lucille Doyle *& a.*

Argued June 4, 1968.

Decided June 28, 1968.

*Stanley & Tardifi John W. Stanley, Jr.*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Wadleigh, Langdell, Starr, Peters & Dunn*and *Theodore Wadleigh (Mr. Wadleigh*orally), for the defendant Lucille Doyle.

Grimes, J.

This is an action at law to recover for services claimed to have been rendered by the plaintiff for the defendants. Under a writ dated May 27, 1966 in which both defendants were joined, the sheriff made a bulky article attachment of some personal property and a real estate attachment. The defendants had been separated, and a divorce action was pending. Mrs. Doyle was in the process of selling some household furnishings by auction and the plaintiff, believing that he held nothing under the real estate attachment, sent the sheriff to make further attachments. Mrs. Doyle gave the sheriff a check in the amount of $1,208 and he made the following return on the writ: “In lieu of any further attachments other than is noted on this writ, the within named defendant Lucille G. Doyle, gave me Bond in the sum of $1,208.00, currency of the United States of America, which the undersigned holds in his possession. ”

After a *non est inventus*return, service was made on both defendants by publication. Mrs. Doyle appeared, but Mr. Doyle defaulted. The case against Mrs. Doyle was tried and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. By motion, she sought the return of the $1,208, claiming that it should not be used to satisfy any *102judgment against Mr. Doyle. This motion was granted. Plaintiff’s exception was transferred by *Bownes,*J.

Mrs. Doyle testified that the $1,208 was solely her money and that she deposited it with the sheriff in lieu of an attachment which he was about to make upon an electric organ which was her property. She said that she did not know where Mr. Doyle was at the time, nor did she know of any assets that he had anywhere in this state. Whether the money was deposited by Mrs. Doyle to prevent any further attachments of her property alone or whether it was deposited to prevent any further attachments against property of her husband also, was a question of fact which could be shown by evidence apart from the sheriff’s return. *Pike*v. *Scribner,*101 N. H. 314. Since the Trial Court’s finding was supported by the evidence, the order must be

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> CHINESE RENMINBI

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             .12048
<CASH>                                   1,051,412
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           35,395,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                              5,139,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        45,503,927
<PP&E>                                   6,213,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          52,501,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   30,274,694
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     1,821
<OTHER-SE>                              21,139,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            52,501,881
<SALES>                                 39,535,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        39,535,894
<CGS>                                   31,813,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           31,813,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          2,295,831
<INCOME-TAX>                               505,692
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,790,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,807,613
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .830
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .720


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             142                     121
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2326                    1756
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                            1408                    1321
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,777                  13,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9542                    6494
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                        8225                    6661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,777                  13,163
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4237                    4355
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3851                    3896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2)                      66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141                     123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    245                     270
<INCOME-TAX>                                       108                     108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       137                     162
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19                    0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19                    0.28


</TABLE>
#### § 400.25 Residency requirements.

A State may not impose requirements as to duration of residence as a condition of participation in the State's program for the provision of assistance or services.