11082 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

October 1, 2009. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: Nonscheduled/ondemand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information submitted in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Santa 

Barbara Municipal Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: Schematic 

design and design development for 

airline terminal improvements. 

Decision Date: January 12, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Chuck McCormick, Los Angeles 

Airports District Office, (310) 725–3626. 

Public Agency: County of Eagle, Eagle, 

Colorado. 

Application Number: 07–06–C–00–

EGE. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $5,581,125. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date; 

September 1, 2018. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

July 1, 2024. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Construct aircraft deicing facility. 

Acquire development land. 

Terminal road improvements. 

Decision Date: January 17, 2007. 

For Further Information Contact: 

Chris Schaffer, Denver Airports District 

Office, (303) 342–1258. 

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No. city, state Amendment 

approved date 

Original approved net 

PFC revenue 

Amended approved net 

PVC revenue 

Original estimated charge 

exp. date 

Amended estimated charge 

exp. date 

04–03–02–MFE; McAllen, TX .............................................. 01/08/07 $2,422,037 $6,133,439 04/01/07 11/01/11 

03–04–C–01–ILM; Wilmington, NC ..................................... 01/11/07 12,785,647 11,585,647 04/01/18 05/01/17 

02–02–C–01–SFO; San Francisco, CA ............................... 01/12/07 224,034,821 224,034,821 01/01/06 01/01/06 

06–07–C–01–GJT; Grand Junction, CO ............................. 01/23/07 6,355,297 8,330,000 08/01/19 08/01/23 

96–01–C–01–RST; Rochester, MN ..................................... 01/31/07 1,160,582 1,117,326 04/01/99 04/01/99 

99–02–C–02–GRB; Green Bay, WI ..................................... 01/31/07 3,028,496 2,468,496 03/01/02 03/01/02 

93–01–C–06–RHI; Rhinelander, WI .................................... 01/31/07 210,219 204,771 04/01/96 04/01/96 

95–02–U–02–RHI; Rhinelander, WI .................................... 01/31/07 (*) (*) 04/01/96 04/01/96 

*Non applicable. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5, 

2007. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Facility Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 07–1129 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions 

on Proposed Highway in North 

Carolina 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims 

for judicial review of actions by FHWA 

and other Federal Agencies. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces actions 

taken by the FHWA and other Federal 

agencies that are final within the 

meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(I)(1). The 

actions relate to a proposed highway 

project, Greensboro-High Point Road 

Improvements, from US 311 (I–74) to 

Hilltop Road (SR 1424) in Greensboro, 

North Carolina, Guilford County, North 

Carolina. Those actions grant licenses, 

permits, and approvals for the project. 

DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is 

advising the public of final agency 

actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(I)(1). A 

claim seeking judicial review of the 

Federal agency actions on the highway 

project will be barred unless the claim 

is filed on or before September 10, 2007. 

If the Federal law that authorizes 

judicial review of a claim provides a 

time period of less than 180 days for 

filing such claim, then that shorter time 

period still applies. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clarence W. Coleman, P.E., Operations 

Engineer, Federal Highway 

Administration, 310 New Bern Avenue, 

Ste. 410, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601–

1418; Telephone: (919) 856–4350 

extension 133; e-mail: 

clarence.coleman@fhwa.dot.gov. FHWA 

North Carolina Division Office’s normal 

business hours are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

(Eastern Time). You may also contact 

Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD, Project 

Development and Environmental 

Analysis Branch Manager, North 

Carolina Department of Transportation 

(NCDO), 1 South Wilmington Street 

(Delivery), 1548 Mail Service Center, 

Raleigh, North CArolina 27699–1548; 

Telephone (919) 733–3141, 

gthorpe@dot.state.nc.us. NCDOT—

Project Development and Environmental 

Analysis Branch Office’s normal 

business hours are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

(Eastern Time). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the FHWA and other 

Federal agencies have taken final agency 

actions by issuing licenses, permits, and 

approvals for the following highway 

project in the State of North Carolina: 

Greensboro-High Point Road 

Improvements, Federal Air No. STP–

4121(1), Guilford County, North 

Carolina. the proposed action will 

improve 12.7 km (7.9 miles) of the 

Greensboro-High Point Road from the 

northbound ramp terminal of the US 

311 bypass (future I–74) interchange in 

High Point to the Hilltop Road 

intersection in Greensboro, North 

Carolina. Portions of the selected 

alternative (Corridor 2) widen existing 

roadways and portions construct a four 

to six-land facility on new location. The 

actions by the Federal agencies, and the 

laws under which such actions were 

taken, are described in the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) 

for the project, approved on May 15, 

2006, in the FHWA Record of Decision 

(ROD) issued on December 30, 2006, 

and in other documents in the FHWA 

administrative record. The FEIS, ROD, 

and other documents in the FHWA 

administrative record file are available 

by contacting the FHWA or NCDOT at 

the addresses provided above. The 

FHWA FEIS and ROD can be viewed at 

the NCDOT—Project Development and 

Environmental Analysis Branch, 1 

South Wilmington Street, Raleigh, North 

Carolina; NCDOT—Division 7 

Construction Engineer Office, 1584 

Yanceyville Street, Greensboro, North 

Carolina and Greensboro MPO Office, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices 11083 

300 West Washington Street, 

Greensboro, North Carolina. 

This notice applies to all Federal 

agency decisions as of the issuance date 

of this notice and all laws under which 

such actions were taken, including but 

not limited to: 

1. General: National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–

4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 

U.S.C. 109]. 

2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–

7671(q)]. 

3. Land: Section 4(f) of the 

Department of Transportation Act of 

1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]; Landscaping and 

Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 

U.S.C. 319]. 

4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act 

[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section 

1536], Marine Mammal Protection Act 

[16 U.S.C. 1361], Anadromous Fish 

Conservation Act [16 U.S.C. 757(a)–

757(g)], Fish and Wildlife Coordination 

Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d)], Migratory 

Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712], 

Magnuson-Stevenson Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act of 

1976, as amended [16 U.S.C. 1801 et 

seq.]. 

5. Historic and Cultural Resources: 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act of 1966, as amended 

[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archeological 

Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16 

U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological and 

Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 

469–469(c)]; Native American Grave 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013]. 

6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights 

Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–

2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious 

Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland 

Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 

4201–4209]. 

7. Wetlands and Water Resources: 

Land and Water Conservation Fund 

(LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 4601–4604]; Safe 

Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 

300(f)–300(j)(6)]; Wild and Scenic 

Rivers [16 U.S.C. 1271–1287]; 

Emergency Wetlands Resources Act [16 

U.S.C. 3921, 3931]; TEA–21 Wetlands 

Mitigation [23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(m), 

133(b)(11)]; Flood Disaster Protection 

Act [42 U.S.C. 4001–4128]. 

8. Hazardous Materials: 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) [42 U.S.C. 9601–9675]; 

Superfund Amendments and 

Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA); 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA) [42 U.S.C. 6901–6992(k)]. 

9. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 

Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 

Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, 

Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low Income 

Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and 

Enhancement of Cultural Resources; 

E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. 

13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175 

Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514 

Protection and Enhancement of 

Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112 

Invasive Species. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning 

and Construction. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 12372 

regarding intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities apply to this 

program.) 

Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(I)(1). 

Issued on: February 28, 2007. 

Clarence W. Coleman, 

Operations Engineer, Raleigh, North Carolina. 

[FR Doc. 07–1143 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1143–RY–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NTHSA–2007–27505] 

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 

Standards: New Pneumatic Tires for 

Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, DoT. 

ACTION: Denial of petition for 

rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This document responds to a 

petition for rulemaking regarding 

Federal motor vehicle safety standard 

(FMVSS) No. 119, Pneumatic Tires for 

Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars. 

Pacific Coast Retreaders (PCR), a 

distributor of new truck tires that are 

manufactured in China, petitioned the 

agency on February 1, 2006, to amend 

FMVSS No. 119, paragraph S5.1, Tire 

and rim matching information (b). 

Specifically, PCR petitioned the agency 

to accept tire load rating data for two 

bias ply truck tire sizes, 10–20 and 11–

22.5, from the Chinese tire 

standardization organization Guo Biao 

9744–1997 (GB 9744). NHTSA has 

determined that this petition is moot 

with regard to the 10–20 size tires 

because the maximum load rating 

labeled on these tires, in the single and 

dual wheel configurations, meets the 

requirements of FMVSS No. 119. With 

regard to the 11–22.5 size tires, the 

agency denies the request by the 

petitioner that FMVSS No. 119, 

paragraph S5.1(b) be amended to 

include the GB 9744 maximum load 

rating for this single tire size. The 

agency does not consider amending the 

standard to include the specifications of 

a tire standardization organization for 

one tire size. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Samuel Daniel, Office of Crash 

Avoidance Standards, NVS–122, 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Washington, DC 20590, telephone 

(202) 366–4921, facsimile (202) 366–

7002, electronic mail 

sam.daniel@dot.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

PCR, a distributor of new truck tires 

manufactured in China, petitioned the 

agency on February 1, 2006, to accept 

the Chinese tire marking standards for 

two bias ply truck tire sizes, 10–20 and 

11–22.5. The petitioner stated that the 

requirements in FMVSS No. 119, 

paragraph S5.1(b) are outdated and ‘‘are 

well behind the changes in the 

intermodal transportation industry.’’

The petitioner further stated that the 

Chinese tire marking standards from GB 

9744 are not included in the list of 

marking standards referenced by 

NHTSA in FMVSS No. 119. However, 

PCR did not explicitly request that the 

GB 9744 publication be added to 

FMVSS No. 119. 

The petitioner provided a copy of a 

page from the Chinese GB 9744 

publication with information on the tire 

load limits at various cold inflation 

pressures, similar to a page of truck tire 

load-pressure values from the 

publications listed in paragraph S5.1(b) 

of FMVSS No. 119. The publications 

that are already listed are as follows: 

Tire and Rim Association (TRA); 

European Tyre and Rim Technical 

Organization (ETRTO); Japan 

Automobile Tyre Manufacturers 

Association, Inc. (JATMA); Deutsche 

Industrie Norm; British Standards 

Institution; Scandinavian Tire and Rim 

Organization (STRO); and the Tyre and 

Rim Association of Australia. The table 

on the page from the GB 9744 

publication specifies a maximum load 

rating of 2,160 kg (4,752 pounds) for the 

10–20 size tire load range F (12 plyrated) in the dual wheel (four tires per 

axle) configuration. However, the Tire 

and Rim Association (TRA), which is 

the United States voluntary standards 

organization, in its 2005 Year Book 

specifies a maximum load rating of 

2,180 kg (4,805 pounds) for the same 

tire size and configuration. The TRA 

publication also lists the value of the 

maximum load rating for the 11–22.5 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES