alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 611.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the National Science Foundation.
§ 410.1800 Contingency planning and procedures during an emergency or influx. ( a ) ORR shall regularly reevaluate the number of standard program placements needed for unaccompanied children to determine whether the number of shelters, heightened supervision facilities, and ORR transitional home care beds should be adjusted to accommodate an increased or decreased number of unaccompanied children eligible for placement in care in ORR care provider facilities.
( b ) In the event of an emergency or influx that prevents the prompt placement of unaccompanied children in standard programs, ORR shall place each unaccompanied child in a standard program as expeditiously as possible.
( c ) ORR activities during an influx or emergency include the following: ( 1 ) ORR shall implement its contingency plan on emergencies and influxes, which may include opening facilities to house unaccompanied children and prioritization of placement at such facilities of certain unaccompanied children;
( 2 ) ORR shall continually develop standard programs that are available to accept emergency or influx placements; and
( 3 ) ORR shall maintain a list of unaccompanied children affected by the emergency or influx including each unaccompanied child's: ( i ) Name;
( ii ) Date and country of birth;
( iii ) Date of placement in ORR's custody; and
( iv ) Place and date of current placement.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

DefinitionsElementary EducationInstructional EffectivenessInterdisciplinary ApproachLanguage ArtsResearch NeedsThematic ApproachUnits of Study

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                                        23548
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              23548
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                23548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             0
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                       4239
<OTHER-SE>                                                    19309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  23548
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  0
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               1150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0




</TABLE>
§ 604.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 604.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
#### *A.*S. Martin, Leonard Flint and Emily Emory *v.*I. B. Palmer.

May Term, 1900.

Present: Tart, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Start, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed August 30, 1900.

*Bill in equity*— Signature *by orator’s solicitor sufficient*— A signature by the orator’s solicitor is a sufficient signature to a bill to foreclose a mortgage.

*Decree dismissing bill of foreclosure*— Appeal *without permission of court*— V. *S. 981*— Although no appeal can be taken from a decree for the foreclos- ' ure of a mortgage without permission of the court, an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of foreclosure may be taken without such permission.

Chancery. Heard on bill and motion to dismiss, Orange County, December Term, 1899, Munson, Chancellor. Decree rendered dismissing the bill. The orator appealed. The appeal was filed as of course.

*John W. Gordon*for the orators.

*JR. M. Harvey*for the defendant.

Watson, J.

The bill of complaint was brought to foreclose a mortgage, and it was signed by the orators’ solicitor, but not by the orators. The defendant moved to dismiss the bill for that there was no signature of the orators thereto. The motion was granted, and the cause is here upon appeal therefrom.

The bill is usually drawn by the orators’ solicitor, and he is responsible for its contents. If it contains matter criminal, im*410pertinent, or scandalous, such matter may be expunged, and the solicitor ordered to pay costs; and, from an early time, the general rule of practice has been imperative that the signature of counsel must be subscribed thereto.

It was declared by Lord Eldon that such signature of counsel is to be regarded as a security that, judging from written instructions laid before him of the case of the defendant as well as of the plaintiff, there appeared to him, at the time of framing the bill, good ground of suit. Mit. *&*Ty. Eq. PI. *&*Pr. 145; 1 Nan. Ch. PI. & Pr. 357. And so it is regarded under the chancery practice in this State (Chancery Buie 8), and in the Federal Courts. Equity Eule 24.

A party may sue in person and so be his own solicitor, in which event only, the practice requires that his signature be subscribed to the bill. 1 Hoff. Ch. Pr. 97.

The decree was not for the foreclosure of a mortgage, and, therefore, the orators could take an appeal without permission of the court therefor. Y. S. 981.

*Decree*reversed, *and cause remanded with mandate that the motion to dismiss be*overruled, *and bill adjudged sufficient.*
### GARDERE attorneys and counselors • www.gardere.com

Direct Dial: 713-276-5730 Direct Fax: 713-276-6730 Email: pmclauchlanrtligardere.com 

# RECEIVED JUN 2 62013 

## HEARING DOCKET

June 25,2013


### VL4 OVERNIGHTDELIVERY Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur WrightBuilding, Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Re: FDMS No. FAA 2013-0286; 2011EA700202; In the Matter of Radio Holland USA, Inc.; U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, Washington, D.C. Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed the original and (I) one copy ofRadio Holland USA, Inc.'s Notice of Intention to Take the Oral and Videotaped Deposition of Special Agent Fernandez for filing inthe above-referenced matter. I would appreciate you returning a date-stamped copy ofthe Notice to me inthe enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contactme.

PAM/ppm Enclosure**GtfMMI!~!;'N&~:fLP** Verytruly yours,

# ~tJ.;t~ Peter A. McLauchlan

1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002-5011 • 713.276.5500 Phone • 713.276.5555 Fax Austin • Dallas • Houston • Mexico City

# u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATBE.

# cE'\IE0 FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## JUN 2 620\3 OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter ofRadio Holland USA, Inc. 2011EA700202 Richard C. Goodwin, 

### U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

## HEARING DOCKET

RADIO HOLLAND USA, INC.'S NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE THE ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF SPECIAL AGENT FERNANDEZ
TO: COMPLAINANT, Federal AviationAdministration, by and through its attorney ofrecord Jeanine Gotimer, Office of the Regional Counsel, Eastern region, 1 Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, NewYork 11434. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent, Radio Holland USA, Inc., notices the oral and videotaped deposition of Special Agent Louis Fernandez at the following time, date and place, and continuing day to day thereafter until complete: 

### DATE: July 25,2013 

### TIME: 9:00a.m. (EST) 

### LOCATION: Federal Aviation Administration 1AviationPlaza Jamaica, NewYork 11434 

### REPORTER: Kim Tindall & Associates (832) 408-2844



### 1Respectfully submitted,

PeterA. McLauchlan TBA No. 13740900 AnacarolinaEstaba NYBANo. 4643318 1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 276-5730 Telecopier: (713) 276-6730 /)

ATTORNEYS FORRADIO HOLLAND USA, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on**this~ay** ofJune, 2013, the foregoing Notice was served upon the following parties as indicated below: Federal Aviation Administration VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Jeanine Gotimer, Complainant's Counsel VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel- Eastern Region 1AviationPlaza Jamaica, N.Y. 11434 Fax: (718) 995-5699

Peter A. McLauchlan

Gardere01 - 6332398v.l 

### 2
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying annual Report on Form 10-K of Znomics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
the annual Report on Form 10-K of Znomics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Znomics, Inc.
 
 By: /s/ Gordon F. Stofer
 Name: Gordon F. Stofer
 Title: ChiefExecutive Officer
 
 Date: March 26, 2010
 
 By: /s/ David G. Latzke
 Name: David G. Latzke
 Title: ChiefFinancial Officer
 
 Date: March 26, 2010
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11592 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. HUGO IVAN CASTANEDA, also known as Takua , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 367

- 41

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Hugo Ivan Castaneda has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18 , 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11592 Document: 00514121531 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 11592

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-11592 Document: 00514121531 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
§ 400.314 Priority in provision of services. A State must plan its targeted assistance program and allocate its targeted assistance funds in such a manner that services are provided to refugees in the following order of priority, except in certain individual extreme circumstances: ( a ) Cash assistance recipients, particularly long-term recipients;
( b ) Unemployed refugees who are not receiving cash assistance; and
( c ) Employed refugees in need of services to retain employment or to attain economic independence.
BEFORE TEIE FEDERAL ELECnON COMMISSION 

IntheMtfterof ) 

) A17-02 

Proposed Final Audit Rqxut on Mndia ) 

Blackbum for Congress, Inc. ) 

CEkTlFICATfQN 

L Dayna C Brawn, SecKtary and Qeik of foe Federal Election 

Commissioii, do her^ certify that on Febnuiy 01,2019, Ibe Commission 

decided by a vote of 4-0 to 4)picDve tiie Proposed Final Audit Report on Matdu 

Blackbumfor Coitgress, Inc., as recommended intfae Memoraiidum fiomthe 

Chief Conipliance OfiBcer and the Audit Diviaioa dated Deceniber 21,2018 

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Wahfaer, and Wemtmiib voted 

affirmatively for the dedaum. 

Attest: 

// /Q 

DqmaC. Brown 

Secretary and Cleric of the Commission
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 1992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, September 14, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unif1cat1on of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations. with a 

Amended (Montreal A viatton Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratif icatton 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minortty 

views). 
2 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

* 

* 

* 

No. No. Bv 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE 

PRESIDENT 

695 1011 Wade F. Horn, of Maryland, to be Deputy Jul 1, 92 Mr. Kennedy, 

Director for Demand Reduction, Office of Committee on Labor and 

National Drug Control Policy, vice Herbert Human Resources, without 

D. Kleber, resigned. printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

741 1257 Hugo Pomrehn, of California, to be Under Aug 5, 92 Mr. Johnston, 

Secretary of Energy, vice John Chatfield Committee on Energy and 

Tuck, resigned. Natural Resources, without 

printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

785 505 Parker W. Borg. of Minnesota, a Career Aug 12, 92 Mr. Pell, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Committee on Foreign 

Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Relations, with printed 

Ambassador Extraordinary and report - Ex.Rept. 102-52. 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Union of Burma (Mvanmar). .. *S1gn1f1es nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov

Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you 

send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through 

http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on 

the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include 

your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk 

or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, avoid any form of encryption, 

and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public 

docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at 

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Marianne 

Mannix at (703) 347-0275, or via email at mannix.marianne@epa.gov.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00900

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.C. AND N.M ., Children,

From the 57 th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 03030

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

T he Appellant Felicia Calcagno ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is

GRANTED. The appellant ’ s brief is due on February 23, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Allie Anderson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Anton Anderson, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Milliken Brothers, Incorporated, Appellant.

*Anderson*v. *Milliken Bros., Inc.,*123 App. Div. 614, affirmed.

(Argued December 10, 1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 17, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plain*522tiff’s intestate, alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence.

*John C. Robinson*and *Frank V. Johnson*for appellant.

*Thomas J. O’Neill*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett and IIiscook, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.
#### § 287.125 What supportive and job retention services may be provided under the NEW Program?

The NEW Program grantee may provide, pay for or reimburse expenses for supportive services, including but not limited to transportation, child care, traditional or cultural work related services, and other work or family sufficiency related expenses that the Tribe determines are necessary to enable a client to participate in the program.
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                                      
|----------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|            |  |  |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|            |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer