alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350), the undersigned, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 20th  day of November 2006.   HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC.  /s/ Jack Abramov ----------------------------- Name: Jack Abramov Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 240 (Thursday, December 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 74265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30135]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8115]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of the Al-Shabaab 
(and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to 
Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the 2008 designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designation and that the national security of the United States does 
not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 4, 2012.
 Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-30135 Filed 12-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### § 2506.21 May the Corporation's failure to comply with these regulations be used as a defense to a debt?

No, the failure of the Corporation to comply with any standard in the FCCS or these regulations will not be available to any debtor as a defense.
#### § 327.0 Applicability.

The regulations covered in this part 327 shall be applicable to water resources development projects, completed or under construction, administered by the Chief of Engineers, and to those portions of jointly administered water resources development projects which are under the administrative jurisdiction of the Chief of Engineers. All other Federal, state and local laws and regulations remain in full force and effect where applicable to those water resources development projects.

[65 FR 6898, Feb. 11, 2000]
§ 400.75 Registration for employment services, participation in employability service programs and targeted assistance programs, going to job interviews, and acceptance of appropriate offers of employment. ( a ) As a condition for receipt of refugee cash assistance, a refugee who is not exempt under § 400.76 of this subpart must, except for good cause shown— ( 1 ) Register with an “appropriate agency providing employment services,” as defined in § 400.71, and within 30 days of receipt of aid participate in the employment services provided by such agency, as defined in § 400.154(a) of this part.
( 2 ) Go to a job interview which is arranged by the State agency or its designee.
( 3 ) Accept at any time, from any source, an offer of employment, as determined to be appropriate by the State agency or its designee.
( 4 ) Participate in any employability service program which provides job or language training in the area in which the refugee resides, which is funded under section 412(c) of the Act, and which is determined to be available and appropriate for that refugee; or if such a program funded under section 412(c) is not available or appropriate in the area in which the refugee resides, any other available and appropriate program in such area.
( 5 ) Participate in any targeted assistance program in the area in which the refugee resides, which is funded under section 412(c) of the Act, and which is determined to be available and appropriate for that refugee.
( 6 ) ( i ) Accept an offer of employment which is determined to be appropriate by the local resettlement agency which was responsible for the initial resettlement of the refugee or by the appropriate State or local employment service;
( ii ) Go to a job interview which is arranged through such agency or service; and
( iii ) Participate in a social service or targeted assistance program which such agency or service determines to be available or appropriate.
( b ) The State agency or its designee must permit, but may not require, the voluntary registration for employment services of an applicant or recipient who is exempt under § 400.76 of this part.
[54 FR 5477, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33602, June 28, 1995; 65 FR 15448, Mar. 22, 2000]
§ 264.30 What procedures exist to ensure cooperation with the child support enforcement requirements? ( a ) ( 1 ) The State agency must refer all appropriate individuals in the family of a child, for whom paternity has not been established or for whom a child support order needs to be established, modified or enforced, to the child support enforcement agency (i.e., the IV-D agency).
( 2 ) Referred individuals must cooperate in establishing paternity and in establishing, modifying, or enforcing a support order with respect to the child.
( b ) If the IV-D agency determines that an individual is not cooperating, and the individual does not qualify for a good cause or other exception established by the State agency responsible for making good cause determinations in accordance with section 454(29) of the Act or for a good cause domestic violence waiver granted in accordance with § 260.52 of this chapter, then the IV-D agency must notify the IV-A agency promptly.
( c ) The IV-A agency must then take appropriate action by: ( 1 ) Deducting from the assistance that would otherwise be provided to the family of the individual an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of the amount of such assistance; or
( 2 ) Denying the family any assistance under the program.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 18766          Scale: 180,000          Edition: 7          Edition Date: 26-NOV-83          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1984/12**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  August 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-AR7 Trustfor the 2006 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                    /s/ H. John Berens

| ___________________________________________Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 2522.700 How does evaluation differ from performance measurement? ( a ) Evaluation is a more in-depth, rigorous effort to measure the impact of programs. While performance measurement and evaluation both include systematic data collection and measurement of progress, evaluation uses scientifically-based research methods to assess the effectiveness of programs by comparing the observed program outcomes with what would have happened in the absence of the program. Unlike performance measures, evaluations estimate the impacts of programs by comparing the outcomes for individuals receiving a service or participating in a program to the outcomes for similar individuals not receiving a service or not participating in a program. For example, an evaluation of a literacy program may compare the reading ability of students in a program over time to a similar group of students not participating in a program.
( b ) Performance measurement is the process of systematically and regularly collecting and monitoring data related to the direction of observed changes in communities, participants (members), or end beneficiaries receiving your program's services. It is intended to provide an indication of your program's operations and performance. In contrast to evaluation, it is not intended to establish a causal relationship between your program and a desired (or undesired) program outcome. For example, a performance measure for a literacy program may include the percentage of students receiving services from your program who increase their reading ability from “below grade level” to “at or above grade level”. This measure indicates something good is happening to your program's service beneficiaries, but it does not indicate that the change can be wholly attributed to your program's services.
[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
** **

**Exhibit 99.7**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. §1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Westport InnovationsInc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ashoka Achuthan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

This certification accompanies this annual report on Form 40-F/Apursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 99.1
MERRY LAND PROPERTIES, INC.
Certification of Periodic Financial Report,                                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          Each of the undersigned officers of Merry Land Properties, Inc. certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Merry Land Properties, Inc.or the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
Dated:   August 13, 2002
/s/ W. Tennent Houston    W. Tennent Houston    Chief Executive Officer
Dated:   August 13, 2002
/s/ Dorrie E. Green    Dorrie E. Green    Chief Financial Officer
          This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### § 2522.440 What weight does the Corporation give to each category of the basic criteria?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034, May 28, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615, Aug. 16, 2024.

In evaluating applications, the Corporation assigns the following weights for each category:

| Category | Percentage |
| --- | --- |
| Program design | 50 |
| Organizational capability | 25 |
| Cost-effectiveness and budget adequacy | 25 |

[70 FR 39600, July 8, 2005]
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.301 Applicability. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart are applicable to all biomedical and behavioral research conducted or supported by the Department of Health and Human Services involving prisoners as subjects.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as indicating that compliance with the procedures set forth herein will authorize research involving prisoners as subjects, to the extent such research is limited or barred by applicable State or local law.
( c ) The requirements of this subpart are in addition to those imposed under the other subparts of this part.
#### § 2553.22 What are the responsibilities of a sponsor?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545, Aug. 30, 2024.

A sponsor is responsible for fulfilling all project management requirements necessary to accomplish the purposes of the RSVP project as specified in the Act. A sponsor shall not delegate or contract these overall management responsibilities to another entity. CNCS retains the right to determine what types of management responsibilities may or may not be contracted.

[83 FR 64655, Dec. 17, 2018]
SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Amasa Spring agt. James Day, impleaded, &c.

*Special Term*

*March,*1873.

A trial fee of $30 is taxable on the first and second trials each, where the jury 1 *disagreed*on the first trial, hut found a verdict for defendant on the second.

A charge of $15 for services after notice and before trial, not exceeding five term fees, is also taxable for each trial.

Also a fee of 10 is properly allowed where more than two days were occupied at each trial, for such trials.

A charge for stenographer’s fees for copy minutes of the first trial is not allowable.

*Motion for retaxation of costs.*

De Witt C. Brown, *for def’t.*Day, *for the motion.*

Nathaniel Niles *for plff. opposed.*

Van Vorst, J.

This action was first tried at the May term, 1868. The jury disagreed. A second trial was had at a trial term in January, 1873, which resulted in a verdict for defendant Day, each trial occupied more than two days.

Defendant claims as costs a trial fee ot thirty dollars for each of the terms, also fifteen dollars for proceedings after notice of, and before each trial.

A trial fee of. thirty dollars is allowed for " every trial ” of an issue of fact *(Code*§ 307, *Sub.*4).

This clearly warrants a trial fee, although the jury should disagree, and also a second fee on a subsequent trial *(Hamilton*agt. *Butler,*30 *How.,*36).

Subdivisions of same section allows1 for all proceedings after notice of, and before trial fifteen dollars. After the jnry had disagreed on the first trial, the defendant was *391obliged to renotice the case for trial, and go through the same proceedings preparatory to the second trial, that he had for the first. He was obliged to have the case put on the trial calendar, to subpoena his witnesses, and otherwise to make adequate preparation for the trial. A second charge of fifteen dollars for services before trial is clearly allowable. “‘Not exceeding five term fees” in all, are allowable notwithstanding second trials be had.

Each trial having occupied more than two days ten dollars additional for each trial should be allowed *(Subdivision*4 *of §*307).

The charge for stenographer’s fees for copy minutes of the first trial is not taxable *(Hamilton*agt. Butler, *supra).*

In support of. this item it was specially alleged by the defendant’s counsel that the testimony of a witness given on the first trial, the witness having in the meantime died, was necessary for the second trial, and that it was stipulated between the attorneys of the parties that his evidence should be read on the second trial from the stenographer’s notes taken on the first.

But the attorney for the plaintiff makes affidavit that this evidence was read from a copy of the minutes which he had obtained and for which he had paid. In such case the defendant cannot be allowed for a copy of the minutes as a disbursement.

The affidavit of the travel and attendance of witnesses was sufficient and the fees were improperly deducted by the clerk.

There must be a readjustment of the costs. The clerk will deduct five term fees, *$50:*stenographer’s minutes, $14; and- allow the other items in the bill of costs presented.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

FBR CAPITAL MARKETS CORPORATION

A VIRGINIA CORPORATION



|                                               |  |             
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                             |  | JURISDICTION
|FBR Asset Management Holdings, Inc.            |  | Virginia    
|                                               | 
|FBR Fund Advisers, Inc.                        |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|FBR Investment Management, Inc.                |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|FBR Capital Markets Holdings, Inc.             |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.         |  | Delaware    
|                                               | 
|Friedman, Billings, Ramsey International, Ltd. |  | England     
|                                               | 
|FBR Capital Markets Merchant Banking Co.       |  | Virginia    
|                                               | 
|FBR Capital Markets PT, Inc.                   |  | Virginia
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Tsippy Moldovan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Tsippy Moldovan
Tsippy MoldovanChief Financial OfficerNovember 30,  2005
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Rockingham,

No. 5886.

#### Exeter Co-operative Bank *v.*Mary H. Clark *& a.*

Submitted May 7, 1969.

Decided July 30, 1969.

*Shute, Engel & Frasier,*for the plaintiff, filed no brief.

*504*Flynn, Powell & McGuirk,*for the defendant Ray The Mover, filed no brief.

The defendant Mary H. Clark, pro *se,*filed no brief.

Per curiam.

The basic issue is what claims the defendants have to the amount remaining from the proceeds of a foreclosure sale after the satisfaction of obligations secured by a first and second mortgage on the foreclosed property, and payment of the costs of foreclosure.

The total funds available for distribution, paid into the hands of the clerk of court-, were found to amount to $2,572.54. The master recommended distribution of these funds in accordance with an agreement of the defendant creditors. The record discloses that the creditors had real estate attachments on the foreclosed property formerly belonging to Mary H. Clark and that they had reduced these claims to judgment.

The master’s concluding recommendation is as follows: “The Master recommends that the Clerk of Court be directed to distribute the retained funds accordingly, and that upon said distribution having been made, the petitioner be discharged from all liability to any and all of the petitionees insofar as said funds are concerned.”

The transcript discloses that the master allowed Mary H. Clark wide latitude in testifying, cross-examining witnesses, and in argument. Much of the evidence introduced by this defendant related either to matters in these involved and protracted proceedings which had already been disposed of in previous actions, or appear not germane to the case before the court.

It is axiomatic that such conflicts as might be found in the relevant testimony and the belief or disblief of witnesses and parties were for the trier of facts to resolve. *Lester*v. *Lester,*109 N. H. 359; *Clover &c. Co.*v. *Smith Co.,*96 N. H. 491, 493. The findings and recommendations of the master are supported by the entire record and the Trial Court’s decree is sustained. *Duane*v. *Northeast Handling Systems,*107 N. H. 260, 262; *Romano*v. *Company,*95 N. H. 404, 406.

*Exceptions overruled.*
§ 400.117 Provision of care and services. ( a ) A State may provide care and services to an unaccompanied minor directly or through arrangements with a public or private child welfare agency approved or licensed under State law.
( b ) If a State arranges for the care and services through a public or private nonprofit child welfare agency, it must retain oversight responsibility for the appropriateness of the unaccompanied minor's care.