alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Cain, Randy D." <RCAIN2@alleghenyenergy.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cannon, William E." <WCA NNON@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P." <JLAPCEV@alleghenyene rgy.com> Date: 07/06/2010 11:36 AM Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating ICR - Mitchell Power Station (04978) - Extension Request

July 6, 2010

Jezebele Alicea USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 4303TWashington, DC 20460 RE: Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Allegheny Energy Mitchell Power Station – Plant ID 04978

Dear Ms. Alicea: Allegheny Energy’s Mitchell Power Station received the EPA Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines on Friday, June 18, 2010. We have reviewed the ICR questionnaire (Version 2) and believe its breadth and depth of information require more time to complete. In accord with the instructions on the EPA cover letter, Allegheny Energy respectf ully requests an additional 30 days to provide responses. There are three reasons for this time extension request. First, Mitchell Power Station received on June 11, 2010 an additional 308 information collection request from EPA’s office of Enforcement. This information request focuses on waste generation and management and requires a two-phase response of 30 days and 60 days. Addressing this most recent information request, precludes time being spent on preparing responses to the ELG ICR. In addition, Allegheny Energy initiated a merger with FirstEnergy of Akron, Ohio, on February 11, 2010. In order to support the merger and thoroughly explore the resulting synergies of the combined company numerous employees of Allegheny Energy were sent to Akron at the end of May for approximately a three month period. This has decreased an already lean staff to continue conducting business as usual in addition to responding to such inquiries as this ICR. Compounding the problem is potential attrition of Allegheny En ergy Corporate Services staff in anticipation of job loss associated with the combination of the two companies. Already, one key engineer that would have extensively worked on the ICR as left the company. Finally, the unprecedented issuance of a number of new regulatory proposals (e.g. CCRs, GHG MRR, GHG Ta iloring Rule), al ong with other ICRs (i.e. HAPs MACT and PCB) by EPA and state regulatory agencies has also added to the difficulty to provide thorough and meaningfulresponses by our limited staff. An additional 30 days would allow for Allegheny Energy and power station staffs to not only gather the necessary data required to support the ICR, but also would provide time to review the submittal for completeness and consistency. This additional 30 days in the response time will most likely lessen the need for further inquiry by EPA’s contractor (ERG) for purpose of explanation of the responses provided and possibly supplemental information request to aide clarification. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Randy Cain

Randy Cain Environmental Affairs Manager Allegheny Energy 800 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 phone: 724-838-6004 fax: 724-830-7711 e-mail: rcain2@alleghenyenergy.com
#### Bessie M. V. Caffry, as Executrix of Frank L. Caffry, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*John L. Wilkie, as Executor of John W. Caffry, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.

*Oaffii'y*v. *Wilhie,*130 App. Div. 896, affirmed.

(Argued December 8, 1909;

decided January 11, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 11, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to trace and impress a trust on certain funds.

*Carlisle Norwood, Gustavus W. Rawson*and *Maurice Goodman*for appellant.

*William Rand, Jr.,*and *Arthur F. Gotthold*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisgook, JJ.
From: Nworley <nworley@hiwaay.net> 

To: nburgess@1ecgov, 

Cc: "Teni (Ed Gentle siscretary) Thomas" <escrowagen@aol.com> 

Date: 01/08/2014 05:09 PM 

Subject: Re: Response to the Draft Final Audit Report of the State Democratic Executive Committee of 

Alabama 

Thank you, Ms. Burgess, for your email about the final audit report. 

We are not asking for a hearing before the Commission on the final report, 

nor had I planned to correspond further to my earlier response which you 

accepted. 

I am sending a copy of this email to Mr. Ed Gentle, Alabama Democratic Party 

Treasurer, in case he wishes to do otherwise. Thank you for your assistance, 

Nancy Worley 

Chair, ADP 

334-262-2221 Office 

334-213-6499 Home 

334-318-7010 Cell
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Treasury

###### Office of the Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-06: OTS Nos. 01427, H4049, H4050, and H4348] 

      ( print page 78517)    
                    Notice is hereby given that on November 9, 2006, the Assistant Managing Director, Examinations and Supervision—Operations, Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of osage Federal MHC and Osage Federal Bank, Pawhuska, Oklahoma, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail:                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Midwest Regional Office, 225 East John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 500, Irving, TX 75062-2731.                

Dated: December 22, 2006.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans, 

Legal Information Assistant. 

[FR Doc. 06-9914 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Exhibit 10.1 Amendment No. 1 dated March 31, 2020 to Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 15, 2019 by and between the Registrant and Somahlution, LLC et al.


 

AMENDMENT 1 to the ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT Dated December 15, 2019

 

WHEREAS, Somahlution and Marizyme both wish to amend their Asset Purchase Agreement by replacing Section 9(b) in its entirety with a new Section 9(b) below.

 

Somahlutions and Marizyme mutually agree to replacing Section 9(a and b) in its entirety with a new Section 9(a and b) as per the following:

 

9. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Closing:

 

(a)by the mutual written consent of Seller and Buyer; 

 

(b)by either Party if the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are not consummated by April 30, 2020, which date shall be automatically extended if short term funding is arranged for up to an additional 30 days if and as required (the “Drop-Dead Date”) and further by mutual agreement;  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement as of the date written below.

 

	SOMAHLUTION LLC

	 

	 

	Marizyme, Inc.

	 


	(“Somahlution”)

	 

	 

	(“Marizyme”)

	 


	 

	 

	 

	 

	 


	By:

	/s/ Satish Chandran 

	 

	By:

	/s/ Nicholas DeVito


	Title:

	CEO

	 

	Title:

	CEO


	Date:

	March 31, 2020

	 

	Date:

	March 31, 2020




 

Amendment 1 – Asset Purchase Agreement – Marizyme and Somahlutions
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)93) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986): Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Republic of.

Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury.

Dated: January 1, 2007.

Harry J. Hicks III,

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 07-10 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4180-25-M
§ 2556.430 Is a VISTA who is terminated early from the VISTA program for other than cause entitled to appeal under these procedures? ( a ) Only a VISTA whose early termination from the VISTA program is for cause, and who has answered the proposal to terminate them for cause in a timely manner, as set forth in § 2556.420(c), is entitled to appeal the early termination action, as referenced in § 2556.425. A termination for cause is based on a deficiency, or deficiencies, in the performance or conduct of a VISTA.
( b ) The following types of early terminations from the VISTA program are not terminations for cause, and are not entitled to appeal under the early termination appeal procedure set forth in §§ 2556.420 and 2556.425: ( 1 ) Resignation from the VISTA program prior to the issuance of a decision to terminate for cause, as set forth in § 2556.420(d);
( 2 ) Early termination from the VISTA program because a VISTA did not secure a suitable reassignment to another project; and
( 3 ) Medical termination from the VISTA program.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

RECEIPT FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 

FOR A REPAYMENT OF 

2008 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY MATCHING FUNDS 

Received on April 6,2012 fiom the Federal Election Commission (by hand 

deliveiy) a check drawn on BB&T Bank in fhe amount of $2,136,507.00. Hie 

check represents a repayment from John Edwards for President for matching 

fimds received in excess of the candidate's entitlement. 

The repayment should be deposited into the Matching Payment Account. 

John Edwards for President 

Amount of Repayment: $2,13<S,507.00 

Presented by: Received by: 

for 

Federal Election Commission United States Treasury 
UTRECHT & PHILLIPS, PLLC 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1900 M STREET, N.W. 

SurrB 500 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 

(202) 778-4000 

FACSIMILB (202) 842-5825 

www.up-law.com 

April 6,2012 

Mr. Lawrence L. Calvert, Esq. 

Associate General Counsel 

Federal Election Commission, Audit Division 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: John Edwards and John Edwards for President (LRA 743) 

Dear Mr. Calvert: 

In accordance with discussions with Erica Lee, this is to infoim you that we have 

delivered a check to Marty Kuest of the Audit Division today. 

This check is from John Edwards for President (Committee ID: C00431205) to the 

United States Treasury in the amount of $2,136,507. This satisfies the requirement outlined in 

your March 13,2012 communication ("Repayment Determination After Administrative 

Review") to remit payment ofthis amount within 30 calendar days. 

Sincerely, 

Patricia A. Fiori 

Counsel, John Edwards for President 

Cc: Marty Kuest, Audit Manager 
John Edwards for President

Vendor No: V..0~1150 Check No: 50511

Department of the Treasury

April 4, 2012

Reference Invoice Date Invoice Descriation Net Amount Paid

FEe AUDIT REPAY 04/04/12 FEe Audit Repayment 2,136,507.00

Total: 2,136,507.00
JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI

GOVERNOR DAWN R GALLAGHER COMMISSIONER

AUGUSTA September 10, 2008

David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U .S. EPA Region I 1 Congress St., Suite 1100 Boston, Ma. 02114-2023 RE: Certification of Required SIPElements Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the ~ PM2 .5 NAAQS Dear Mr . Conroy: I am pleased to submit the enclosed documentation that the Maine State Implementation Plan for air quality adequately meets the CleanAir Act (CAA) "infrastructure" requirements ofsection 110a(1) and (2) forthe 1997 PM2 .5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) . As you know, pursuant to sections 110(a)(1) and (2) ofthe CAA, all states are required to submit plans to provide for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement ofthe 8- hour ozone and PM2

.5 standards. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIP requirements, including emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance ofthe standards no later than three years after the promulgation ofa new standard (July 2000) . In March of 2004, a lawsuit was initiated against EPAfor failure to take action against states that had not made SIP submissions to meet the requirements ofsections 110(a)(1) and (2) . EPAsubsequently entered into a consent decree that obligated it to determine whether states have made the submissions necessaryto meet the section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for ozone and PM 2 .5.I The Maine Department of Environmental Protection is submitting this document to certify that its existing SIP already satisfies all section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the PM2.5 NAAQS. The initial Maine State Implementation Plan was approved by EPA on October 28, 1972, and has subsequently been revised and expanded on numerous occasions. The infrastructure elements required by section 110(a)(2) are fully addressed by existing Maine statutes, regulations and plans. 1 The ozone submission deadline was December 15, 2007 (extended until January 8, 2008) and the PM 2.5 deadline is October 5, 208. The Department previously submitted its ozone infrastructure certification on January3, 2008. 17 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 (207) 287-7688 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: 764-1507 web site: www

.maine .Ruv/dep printed on recvcled paperIfyou should have any questions, please contact Jeff Crawford at 207-287-2437.

Sincerely,

ames P. Brooks, Director Bureau ofAir Quality Attachments (1) cc: AnnArnold Rich Burkhart Jeff Crawford SIP file (w/encl .) EPAfile
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-2 |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------|

I, James F. Vacca, Vice President, Item Processing, of HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc., (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 4.10(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I, as Depositor, HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-2, as Trust, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, and hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from August 10, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

|   | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 5th day of March 2007. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.

 

|   | By: | /s/ James F. Vacca |
|--------|-----|--------------------|

|   | Name: | James F. Vacca |
|--------|-------|----------------|

|   | Title: | Vice President, Item Processing |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2446

BENJAMIN JACOB STRATTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Catheryn K. Clemens, Michael L. 

McGinty,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00046-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Jacob Stratton, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry A. Fox, THOMPSON MCMULLAN 

PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Jacob Stratton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stratton v. 

Commonwealth of Va., No. 4:17-cv-00046-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2017). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1687 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1687

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 2009

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the federally occupied building located at McKinley Avenue 
  and Third Street, SW., Canton, Ohio, as the ``Ralph Regula Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RALPH REGULA FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Administrator of General Services shall 
ensure that the federally occupied building located at McKinley Avenue 
and Third Street, SW., Canton, Ohio, is known and designated as the 
``Ralph Regula Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--With respect to the period in which the building 
referred to in subsection (a) is federally occupied, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Ralph Regula Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on New American City, 

Inc. (NAC) 

Agenda Document No. lSr22-A 

CERTlFICA-nON 

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open meeting 

on May 21,201S, do hereby certify that the Coimnission decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on New American City, Inc. (NAC) as set forth 

in Agenda Document No. 1S-22-A. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

^ate Shelley E. Ga^ 

Deputy Secret^ of the Commission
§ 2516.510 What happens if the Corporation rejects a State's application for an allotment grant? If the Corporation rejects a State's application for an allotment grant under § 2516.600(b)(2), the Corporation will— ( a ) Promptly notify the State of the reasons for the rejection;
( b ) Provide the State with a reasonable opportunity to revise and resubmit the application;
( c ) Provide technical assistance, if necessary; and
( d ) Promptly reconsider the resubmitted application and make a decision.
§ 287.165 What are the data collection and reporting requirements for Public Law 102-477 Tribes that consolidate a NEW Program with other programs? ( a ) Currently, there is a single reporting system for all programs operated by a Tribe under Public Law 102-477. This system includes a program report, consisting of a narrative report, a statistical form, and a financial report. ( 1 ) The program report is required annually and submitted to BIA, as the lead Federal agency and shared with DHHS and DOL.
( 2 ) The financial report is submitted on a SF-269A to BIA.
( b ) Information regarding program and financial operations of a NEW Program administered by a Public Law 102-477 Tribe will be captured through the existing Public Law 102-477 reporting system.