alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Marty Favin

To: Ryan Krogen

Subject: FW: SDDP Written Response to Interim Audit Report (IAR)

Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 5:44:19 PM

Attachments: SDDP Response to FEC Finding 1.pdf

SDDP Response to FEC Finding 2.pdf

SDDP Response to FEC Finding 3.pdf

From: Megan Forster [mailto:megan@sddp.org]

Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 5:37 PM

To: Audit <audit@fec.gov>

Cc: Marty Favin <mfavin@fec.gov>; Sam Parkinson <sam@sddp.org>

Subject: SDDP Written Response to Interim Audit Report (IAR)

To Whom It May Concern:

The South Dakota Democratic Party's written response to the Interim Audit Report (IAR,

Findings 1-3) can be found in the attached documents.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Thank you,

--

Megan Forster

Finance Director

South Dakota Democratic Party

1737 S Cleveland Avenue | Sioux Falls, SD 57104

1.605.271.5405 (O) | 1.605.366.0222 (C)

Follow South Dakota Democrats on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SoDakDems

Follow South Dakota Democrats on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SoDakDems

Sign up for Founders Club!: Monthly Donor Program
Audit Committee,

In cooperation with your requests per your findings and recommendations, below is our

response to “Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity - Increased Activity.”

The Audit staff found that the South Dakota Democratic Party (SDDP) had understated

disbursements on original reports field for the two year period ending December 31, 2016. The

SDDP failed to properly comply with FEC guidelines during this period by not disclosing

disbursements by $2,500,147 on the originally filed reports.

Reason for not properly disclosing the disbursements was a failure on the part of the SDDP due

to overlooking filing procedures and need for better training on reporting of receipts and

disbursements to the FEC. There was no intent to not report the disbursements on the originally

filed reports.
Audit Committee,

In cooperation with your requests per your findings and recommendations, below is our

response to “Finding 2. Contributions from Unregistered Political Organizations” Below are

permissible fund notes from committees in question for Finding 2 in the SD IAR.

We obtained statement’s from each organization confirming that the funds contributed to the

SDDP’s federal account were made with federally permissible donations.
Any organization that did not respond above will receive a returned donation from the SDDP.

Until those donations are returned, they will be listed as a ‘debt or obligation’ on our upcoming

monthly FEC report.
Audit Committee,

In cooperation with your requests per your findings and recommendations, below is our

response to “Finding 3. Reporting of Debts and Obligations”

The SDDP has filed amendments to reflect the debts & obligations listed on the Interim Audit

Report on the relevant monthly report(s) they appear on.
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|                       |  |  |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 410.1203 Release approval process. ( a ) ORR or the care provider providing care for the unaccompanied child shall make and record the prompt and continuous efforts on its part towards family unification and the release of the unaccompanied child pursuant to the provisions of this section. These efforts include intakes and admissions assessments and the provision of ongoing case management services to identify potential sponsors.
( b ) If a potential sponsor is identified, ORR shall explain to both the unaccompanied child and the potential sponsor the requirements and procedures for release.
( c ) Pursuant to the requirements of § 410.1202, the potential sponsor shall complete an application for release of the unaccompanied child, which includes supporting information and documentation regarding the sponsor's identity; the sponsor's relationship to the child; background information on the potential sponsor and the potential sponsor's household members; the sponsor's ability to provide care for the unaccompanied child; and the sponsor's commitment to fulfill the sponsor's obligations in the Sponsor Care Agreement, which requires the sponsor to: ( 1 ) Provide for the unaccompanied child's physical and mental well-being;
( 2 ) Ensure the unaccompanied child's compliance with DHS and immigration courts' requirements;
( 3 ) Adhere to existing Federal and applicable state child labor and truancy laws;
( 4 ) Notify DHS, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the Department of Justice, and other relevant parties of changes of address;
( 5 ) Provide notice of initiation of any dependency proceedings or any risk to the unaccompanied child as described in the Sponsor Care Agreement; and
( 6 ) In the case of sponsors other than parents or legal guardians, notify ORR of a child moving to another location with another individual or change of address. Also, in the event of an emergency (e.g., serious illness or destruction of the home), a sponsor may transfer temporary physical custody of the unaccompanied child to another person who will comply with the Sponsor Care Agreement, but the sponsor must notify ORR as soon as possible and no later than 72 hours after the transfer.
( d ) ORR shall conduct a sponsor suitability assessment consistent with the requirements of § 410.1202.
( e ) ORR shall not be required to release an unaccompanied child to any person or agency it has reason to believe may harm or neglect the unaccompanied child or fail to present the unaccompanied child before DHS or the immigration courts when requested to do so.
( f ) During the release approval process, ORR shall educate the sponsor about the needs of the unaccompanied child and develop an appropriate plan to care for the unaccompanied child.
#### W. O. Standish, et al. *vs.*The City of Montpelier and Town of Berlin.

January Term, 1899.

Present: Tart, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed April 29, 1899.

*Report of Commissioners*— Refusal *to Recommit.*— The county court properly refused to recommit a report of commissioners upon the motion of a party who had had his day' in court.

Proceedings to lay out a highway. Heard upon the report of commissioners, exceptions thereto and motion to recommit the same, atthe September term, 1898, Washington county, Start, J., presiding. *Proforma*judgment overruling the motion and exceptions and accepting the report with the usual orders. The Montpelier & Wells River Railroad excepted.

The Montpelier & Wells River Railroad moved to recommit the report for the purpose of having the commissioners find the amount of damages said railroad would be entitled to if the proposed highway should be established across its track at grade.

*J. P. Lamson*for the Montpelier & Wells River Railroad.

*Fred L. Laird*and *T. R. Gordon*for the petitioners.

Tyler, J.

This case comes here upon exceptions by the *288Wells River Railroad Company to the ruling of the court below denying its motion to recommit the commissioners’ report, to the overruling of its exceptions to the report and to the acceptance of the same. The only exception insisted upon in the brief and argument is that to the refusal of the court to recommit the report.

The commissioners, after a full hearing, found and reported, that the public good and the convenience and necessity of individuals required the laying of the proposed highway across the track of the Wells River Railroad Company and they expressed the opinion that it should be laid at grade. They also found and reported that it would be impracticable to build the highway under the railroad, and that in view of the difficulty and expense of constructing an over-grade crossing, such a crossing was not required.

The Railroad Company had notice of and was present by its counsel at the hearings, and had ample opportunity to present its claim for damages to the commissioners. Without deciding what damages, if any, the Railroad Company might have recovered, if it had presented a claim therefor, we must refuse to order the report recommitted for the reason that the Company has had its day in court.

*JicdgmenL affirmed.*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George R. Adams, Appellant, *v.*Jacob F. Stoll et al., as Assessors of the Town of Rosendale, Respondents.

*People ex rel. Adams*v. *Stoll,*131 App. Div. 918, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted November 10, 1909;

decided November 16, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered *562March 18, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a retaxation of costs.

*George JR. Adams,*appellant in person.

*Howard Ohipjp*and *John E. Hardenbergh*for respondents.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Hiscook, J.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 26 ,

2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 01142

- CV

ALTOM TRANSPORT, INC

. , Appellant

V.

MANUEL LOPEZ AND NINA LOPEZ INDIV IDUALLY AND MANUEL LOPEZ AS ADMINISTRAT OR OF THE ESTATE OF CHRISTINA MARIE

LOPEZ, DECEASED , Appellee s

On Appeal from Probate Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 73804

- A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgm ent signed October 28, 2013 . On June 17,
2014, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
§ 2506.20 What is the extent of the Chief Executive Officer's authority to compromise debts owed to the Corporation, or to suspend or terminate collection action on such debts? ( a ) The Chief Executive Officer may compromise, suspend, or terminate collection action on those debts owed to the Corporation that do not exceed $100,000 excluding interest, in conformity with the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended. The Corporation will follow the policies in § 902.2 of the FCCS.
( b ) The uncollected portion of a debt owed to the Corporation that is not recovered as the result of a compromise will be reported to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as income to the debtor in accordance with IRS procedures if this uncollected amount is at least $600.00.
Q 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In Hhe Matter of ) 

) LRA946 

Request for Cominission Directive 69 . ) 

Guidance Ihvoiving the Oakland ) 

County Democratic Party ) 

CERTIFICATIO^ 

L Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on January 28,2014, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0 to 

conclude that OCDP's bingo nights did not constitute three separate fimdraising events, and, 

instead, OCDP was required to itemize all contributions exceeding $50 recdved fiom 

contributors during eadi bingo night under the provisions addressing the recordkeeping 

requirements at 2 U.S.C. § 432(c)(l)-(2); 11 C.F.R. § 102.9(a). 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

^ * Shelley E.Q^ 

Deputy Seoetary of the Conunission
#### § 410.1200 Purpose of this subpart.

This subpart covers the policies and procedures used to release, without unnecessary delay, an unaccompanied child from ORR custody to a vetted and approved sponsor.
#### § 2516.320 Is a participant eligible to receive an AmeriCorps educational award?

No. However, service-learning coordinators who are approved AmeriCorps positions are eligible for AmeriCorps educational awards.
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350), the undersigned, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 18th  day of August 2006.   HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC.  /s/ Jack Abramov ----------------------------- Name: Jack Abramov Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Civ. No. 12578.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

October 18, 1940.]

#### BARBARA PLECITY et al., Respondents, v. DAVID I. KEILLY, Appellant.

*207Harrison Weil and Donald E. Ruppe for Appellant.

A. P. Michael Narlian for Respondents.

McCOMB, J.

Respondents move to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment on the grounds *that the appeal was taken for delay and that the questions on which a decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument.*

Prior to November 1, 1939, rule V, section 3 of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal (213 Cal. xliii) provided for the dismissal of an appeal or the affirmance of a judgment on the grounds of the present motion. However, September 29, 1939, the judicial council abrogated the section of rule V just mentioned, effective as of November 1, 1939. *(Taylor*v. *Parsons,*39 Cal. App. (2d) 336 [102 Pac. (2d) 1096].)

Therefore, the present motion is not well taken and is denied.

Moore, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Status 
of Funding, (5) General Discussion (6) Status of Legislation, (7) Next 
Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 22, 2007, from 1:30 p.m. and 
end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals who wish to speak or propose agenda items send their names 
and proposals to David A. Mortin, Acting DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., 
Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95939. (530) 968-1815; EMAIL 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbacacaaafafa2a5a28badb8e5adaeafe5beb8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="482f2f292c2c212621082e3b662e2d2c663d3b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of 
the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff 
before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and 
individuals who made written request by January 19, 2007 have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: December 18, 2006.
David T. Morton,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 06-9824 Filed 12-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Randy Hultgren for 

Congress (All-01) 

CERTinCATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk ofthe Federal Election 

Coinmission, do hereby certify that on February 06,2013, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandiun on Randy Hultgren for Congress (Al 1-01), as recommended in 

the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division 

dated January 10,2013. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn EE, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

]^te ' Shawn Woodhead Werth J 

Secretary and Clerk ofthe Commission
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph
Postbinder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph PostbinderJoseph Postbinder
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2007



---

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Gordon Samson, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and director of Future Now Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Future Now Group, Inc.. for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Future Now Group, Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: August 30, 2007 |   |              |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------|
|                   |   |              |
|                   |   |              |
|                   |   | /s/ Gordon Samson |   |  
 

 

Gordon Samson

 

 

President and Director

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

Future Now Group, Inc.

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Future Now Group, Inc. and will be retained by Future Now Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

 

 

  |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Zubeda Mohamed-Lakhani, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Cartan Holdings Inc., for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cartan Holdings Inc.



Date:  June 26, 2007



/s/ Zubeda Mohamed-Lakhani

Zubeda Mohamed-Lakhani

President, C.E.O. and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 287.90 Are Tribes required to complete any certifications?

Yes. A Tribe must include in its NEW Program plan the following four certifications and any additional certifications that the Secretary prescribes in the planning guidance: Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters—Primary Covered Transactions; Certification Regarding Drug Free Workplace Requirements for Grantees Other Than Individuals; Certification Regarding Tobacco Smoke, and Assurances—Non-Construction Programs.