Iten 8

FOIA Implementation Rules or Regulations

Agency Document Identification ._Fed. Reg. Ref.
- DoD DoD Directive 5400.7, _ 40 F.R. No. 39
14 Feb 1975 26 Feb 1975, pg 8190
. OSsD/JCS *DoD Directive 5400.10, To he published
6 Jan 1976
DEPT ARMY AR 340-17, Change #1, 40 F.R. No. 40
24 Jan 1975 27 Feb 1975, pg 8335
DEPT NAVY ” SECNAVINST 5720.42B, 40 F.R. No. 56
13 Feb 1975 21 Mar 75, pg 12776
DEPT AF AFR 12-30, 40 F.R. No. 37
19 Feb 1975 24 Feb 75, pg 7901
*Interim Message Change 76-1 (not published)
DCA DCA Instruction 210-225-1, 40 F.R. No. 70
31 Mar 1975 10 Apr 75, pg 16203
DCAA DCAA Manual 5410.6, 40 F.R. No. 34
Aug 1975 . 19 Feb 75, pg 7301
DIA DIA Regulation 12-39, 40 F.R. No. 34
18 Feb 1975 19 Feb 75, pg 7292
*Change A, 16 Sep 76 (not published)
DIS DIS Regulation 01-12, 40 F.R. No. 34
14 Feb 1975 19 Feb 75, pg 7289
DMA DMA Instruction 5400.7A, 40 F.R. No. 29
12 May 1975 11 Feb 75, pg 6336
DNA DNA Instruction 5400.7, 40 F.R. No. 124
22 May 1975 26 Jun 75, pg 27025
DSA DSA Regulation 5400.14, 40 F.R. No. 34
. 13 Feb 75 19 Feb 75, pg 7282
NSA NSA/CSS Regulation 10-9, 40 F.R. No. 34
3 Mar 1975 19 Feb 75, pg 7303
DCPA DCPA Rules and Regulations 40 F.R. No. 34

19 Feb 75, pg 10457

* Amendments to Rules or Regulations promulgated in 1976 (attached to
respective agency reports).

15



Item 5(a)

Exemptions Invoked on Appeal Determinations

. Exemptions by Number (552(a))
Reporting

. Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total
OsD/JCS 3 oO 1 ie) 6 2 1 ° 0 0 13
DEPT ARMY il 8 0 14 41 31 24 0 1?) 129
DEPT NAVY | 7 2 ce) 7 29 28 13 oO 0 86
DEPT AF 8 4 4 42 94 58 29 0 10) 239
DCA 1) 1°) 0 0 f°) oO i?) ie) 0 0
DCAA 0 ie) 1 1 17 oO 1 0 0 20
DIA 4 ie) i?) 0 O Oo 1°) 0 0 4
DIS 10) 0 0 fe) ie} i) 1) 0 10) 0
DMA ie} ie} ie} 0 10) ) oO oO 0 1°)
DNA 0 oO Oo 0 10) 0 oO 0 ie) 0
DSA 0 0 ie) 5 1 Oo Oo 0 oO 6
NSA 25 0 28 0 4 oO 1 te} 0 58
DCPA 0 0 0 0 0) ° o 0 0 °
DoD Total 58 14 34 69 192 119 69 c) 0 555,
Percent of 10.45 2.52 6.13. 12.43 34.60 21.44 12.43 10) 0 100%

. Total



5400.7 (Hnel 2)
Feb 14, 75

c. The incremental cost of collecting the fees would be
an unduly large part of the receipts from the activity;

d. The request emanates from a representative of the
public information media seeking a reasonable number of records.

2. A refusal to waive charges by the official responsible for
the initial decision on the request for the record may be appealed
to the head of the component or his designee for purposes of final

appeal.
Collections

1. Normally, collection of charges and fees will be made
in advance of rendering the service. In some instances, it may be
more practical to collect charges and fees at the time of conveying
the service or property to the recipient, but only in those instances
where the request specifically states that whatever cost involved
will be acceptable or acceptable up to specified limit that covers
anticipated costs.

2. Collection of scheduled fees and charges will normally
be deposited to Miscellaneous Receipts of the Treasury.

3. Search fees are assessable even when no records
responsive to the request, or no records not exempt from disclosure
are found, provided the requester is advised of the requirement at
the time the estimated charges are presented tc the requester for
approval and he agrees to incur the costs of search.

19



CONTENTS

Page
Item 1 -- Initial Determinations Resulting in not Providing 1
. all or a Portion of Record Requested .
Item 2  -- Initial Determinations
° (a) Exemptions Invoked 2
(b) Statutes Invoked 3
(c) Other Reasons 4
Item 3 -- Initial Denial Officials by Participation
A. Exemption Denials 6
B. Other Authority Denials 7
Item 4 -- Number of Appeals and Results 8
Item 5  -- Appeal Determinations
(a) Exemptions Invoked 9
(b) Statutes Invoked 10
(c) Other Reasons 11
Item 6 -- Participation of Appellate Authorities 12
Item 7 -- Court Opinions and Action Taken 14
Item 8 -- FOIA Implementation Rules and Regulations 15
Item 9 -- Fees Schedule and Fees Collected 16
Item 10 -- Administrative Efforts
A. Availability of Records 20
B. Calendar Year Costs and Fees Collected 21
Cc. Time Limit Extensions by Agency 24
D. Internal Memoranda (number and availability) 25

Item 11 -- FOIA Instructional and Educational Efforts 26



Item 9

Fees Schedule and Fees Collected

The attached fee schedule, Enclosure 2,
DoD Directive 5400.7, establishes standard
costs collectable by DoD Agencies. The
fees policy as pertains to minimum fees
is currently undergoing the formal
revision process to confirm currently
encouraged discretionary practices of
basing fees upon the amount of search
time expended and/or material furnished

at the published rates for each category.

$196,759.47 was collected from the public
for making records available. (See Item 10B

for agency totals)

16



+Kouebe yore uy wezbozd IOd 913 OF ATeatsnypoxs pezoAep etdoad so rzequmu

ueou 0} penzysuco eq 3OU pTnoys soTysTIeys reeAueU
sanoy eTgetTeae Jo ebejzusoized e se queds owtq eyy
PeATOAUT STENPTATPUL

*“sqsenbez. oftgnd Gutssesoad yzTM peqeqpooss'

oun

*qsenbez zed stseq ATAanoy ue uo 70 “(skep 06 yore)
butprzosez Jo uoT_do |y3 ueaTb eze Sutsseoord qsonbez ut
2 squnoue peqeulfyse TeToueh JOeTJed szsS0o esoyL

*

TESTS fee ee ees ree ariqnd worjs parsety
Stiveer) Ste bey |S Be’ SHS* tS CCLO“ ORY y SST RUSI FO STses
: . | __
- aaa: = =
868'9 TeL'T 88s'0P vop'ez (reas faeanduoo
qeaera ‘Teasod sv yons suo3t Jo SuTaaed
“laa Axequntoa) s3s0D buyyvaeds 20470 “AL
— OOT _}_ _ote*se | _ 99t' 6 _ _ “"gysoa x0430 50 TeIOL
_ wotet _ USSENE spzooaz paquyad 30 3709 9
TT. ToLUe | teeeT Tet i sysop uoTzonpoztay "a
~ao'Z } ~ Boze me 83809 out; Yorvos ZognduoD TY
$3309 pazeTaY ast) 2HUIO oss
NA SLL Bey ret OST psp |! e250 Touuoszed jo {e10, ‘a
£90" ST 6$6'2T i vel t 880'9bZ_ i PIs’ 26 i $98‘T6z ocp’06 | (gz) aaez peayzsao “oF }
———98t4oei___peatis. ‘o6b Spf‘ PAG poate sag‘ Lat! oze‘gag | DIT pue aIr 30 Tea0y "a i
_ lanier! ps6‘or _ i __ o6r 1] _ _zo8'2s2_} _ ge9/06 _ |__148's8T Po yez03 ysoo AnoyurH (9)
Srawsior! T eso’, ee, Testes =] ego Sato | es soyataysoe 79y30 (Ss)
Jos gst see seetzt_ | soca __i_ _eze’ot_ ft sdaad; wz0g y fsPaz0d (py)
"sey Teeete tr TT Savers” To Tsvetot iT evero” qeaordde ¥ woyaeuzproca (£)
a or ul ~ PHOTOS 7 tagrBE I eye ET RS I buyspoxo y mopaoy (Z),
686'ES oeo'ze | ~ Stee | auy3 yorvas (Tt)
; (sojex atnpeyos a3) AzobureD hq
HL ---bL-- | gunowuew peaewyas0 30 3800 °D
‘eps TEL, pev’oee _ | _ veo*tee. (pexepysuos sopexb) savaduru 30 3509 1a
“ier ) ueet 1 savohuvu pozeutasa "Vv
H 489809 TOuUoszo.d “IT
68s'8T i (gzoqoej 9509 X S3sonboa 50 ‘ON)
i possadorg sasanboy ouzanon t
x BNILNO L809 |

AAYN |

SHIONTOV ONILNOdAY

a



5400.7. (Encl 2)

Feb 14, 75

SEARCH
Clerical search, per hour. ©. +--+ eee ree ts $5.50
*Minimum charge... - - + ++ > woe ee eee 2.75

Professional search (includes computer programmer
time and review to determine whether a record
comes within the scope of a request) per hour .. .- 11.00
*Minimum charge. 2. 6 6 eee te tt ett 5.50

Computer Service Charges

Computer service charges will be based on actual computer con-
figuration used and be based on direct costs only of the Central
Processing Unit, plus Input/Output Devices, plus Memory
Capacity. Transportation costs of records and personnel arising
from searches for requesting reports will be charged at actual
cost.

Audiovisual Documentary Material

Service charges for audiovisual documentary materials will include
clerical and professional search fees as listed above as well as the
direct costs of reproducing the photography or tape and shipping or
mailing charges. Audiovisual materials provided a requester under
provisions of this Directive need not be in reproducible format or
quality. .

Waiver of Fees

1. In general, charges shall be waived or reduced when it
is determined that release of a requested record primarily benefits
the general public and, therefore, is in the public interest.
Examples of common situations in which such a determination may
be made include:

a. The recipient of the benefits is engaged in a nonprofit
activity designed for public safety, health or welfare;

b. Payment of the full costs or fee by a state, local
government or nonprofit group would not be in the interest of the
program;

* under Revision

18



Item 6

(Cont'd)
_ No. of Instances
Name Title of Participation
Exemptions Other
DCAA

Harry W. Kettles

DIA

Mr. J. R. Brock

D. P. Harvy, RADM, USN

R. L. Johnson, LtCol,
USAF

B. R. Inman, VADM, USN

Mr. W. T. Riordan

DNA

DSA

WwW. W. Vaughan, LtGen,
USA

J. C. Raaen, Jr. MajGen,
USA

Philip Crosby, RADM,
USN

NSA
William H. Jenkins
John R. Harney

DCPA

Assistant Director, Resources

General Counsel
Chief of Staff

Chief of Staff (Acting)

Vice Director, Plans,
Operations and Support

No Appeals

Deputy Director
Programs, Production and
Operations

No Appeals

Director, DSA

Acting Deputy Director, DSA

Deputy Director, DSA

FOI Appeal Authority
FOI Appeal Authority

No Appeals

DoD Total

13°

17 O)
6
2
1
1
1
1 2
3 1
2 0)
14 4
13 i
401 72



Description of Other Reasons

Transferred Request (Appeal):

This category applies when responsibility for making a determination or
a decision on categories listed below is shifted from one Component to
another Component/Agency.

Lack of Records:

This category covers situations wherein the requester is advised the
agency has no record, or has no statutory obligation to create a record.

Failure of Requester to Reasonably Describe Record:

This category is specifically based on Section 552(a) (3) (A) of the FOIA.

Other Failures by Requesters to Comply with Published Rules and/or

Directives:

This category is based on Section 552(a) (3) (B) of the FOIA and includes
instances of failure to follow published rules concerning time, place,
fees and procedures.

Request (Appeal) Withdrawn by Requester:

This category covers situations when the requester asks an agency to
disregard the request (or appeal) or pursues the request outside FOIA
channels.



Item 10 D

Internal Memoranda
(Including Directives not Published in Federal Register)

Reporting .
Activity No. of Memoranda No. Available to Public

>) 3 ; 3
OSD/JCS 8 8
DEPT ARMY 4 4
DEPT NAVY 16 16
DEPT AF 2 2
DCA 0 0
DCAA 4 4
DIA. 2 2
DIS to} 0
DMA 0 0
DNA oO. 1)
DSA 12 12
NSA 4 . ie}
Depa 2 oe

DoD Total 55 51
.
t Copies of internal memoranda have been withdrawn from agency reports and

consolidated by agency in the Attachments to the Report.

25



Item 2(a)

Exemptions Invoked on Initial Determinations

. Exemptions by Number (552(a))°

Reporting

. Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total
OsD/ICS 51 6 18 2 24 12 ‘3 (0) ie) 121
DEPT ARMY 90 7 10 70 190 124 242 0 0 733
DEPT NAVY | 25 11 ll 65 95 72 91 1 ie) 371
DEPT AF 45 15 1 256 365 307 61 Oo. 0 | 1,050
DCA 5 Oo ie} Oo ie} i} Oo i) 0 5
DCAA ie} oO 3 3 21 0 1 ie} te) 28
DIA 29 3 2 i?) 1 3 O 0 ie) 38
DIS ie} 0 0 Oo 1 3 6 0 ie) 10
DMA (0) te) i) (0) 0 4 2 e) oO 6
DNA ie) Oo 0 0 1) 0 oO O 0 Oo
DSA 2 1 Oo 56 22 41 5 0 Oo 127
NSA 83 ie) 112 3 8 4 11 0 oO 221
DCPA 0 o o 1 1 0 0 oO o}. 2
DoD Totals 330 43 157 456 728 570 427 1 0} 2,712*
Percent of

. Total 12.17 1.59 5.79 16.81 26.84 21.02 15.74 0.04 O 100%

* Total does not agree with Item 1 because of cases where two or more
exemptions were cited. :



Item 1

Initial Determinations Resulting in not
Providing all or a Portion of Record Requested

Total Demands Reasons

. Completed Completed
Reporting Public Reportable Statutory
Activity Requests Requests * Exemptions + Other = Total
OSD/SCS 868 926 82 489 571
DEPT ARMY - 16,017 16,017** 628 523 1,151
DEPT NAVY 3,249 3,510 275 220 495
DEPT AF 14,324 15,837 673 1,979 2,652
DCA 57 68 5 15 20
DCAA 38 38 28 5 33
DIA 609 648 30 160 190
DIS 92 93 8 75 83
DMA 24 24 6 7 13
DNA 16 16 Oo oO 0
DSA 5,923 5,923** 85 1,303 1,388
NSA 312 378 : 136 _ 231 367
DCPA 13 17 1 9 10
DoD Totals 41,542 43,495 1,957 5,016 6,973

“ * A reportable request is that portion of an FOI request resulting in a

single record or group of records pertaining to one general subject
area being acted upon by one IDA who concludes that a single type of
determination applies.

** DEPT ARMY and DSA could not gather statistics from field activities for
this report.



Item _7

Court Opinions and Action Taken

. No court opinions or orders were
issued against Department of
Defense agencies in 1976 giving
rise to a proceeding under

Section 552(a) (4) (F) of title 5, U.S.C.

14



Item 2(c)

Other Reasons Cited on Initial Determinations

. Reporting .
Activity Category* : Total

. 1 2 3 4 5
OsD/JCS 191 236 30 15 17 489
DEPT ARMY 132 283 17 65 26 523
DEPT NAVY 151 36 13 14 6 220
DEPT AF 921 681 193 86 98 1,979
DCA 2 3 0 8 2 15
DCAA i) 5 0 t+) te) 5
DIA 10 145 3 2 oO 160
DIS 1 34 0 40 o 15
DMA Oo 6 0 Q 1 7
DNA iv) oO 0 0 i) ie)
DSA 1,234 27 8 9 25 1,303
NSA 9 206 11 5 O 231
DCPA oO 9 te) oO oO : 9
DoD Total , 2,651 1,671 275 _ 244 175 5,016

* 1. ‘Transferred Request.
« 2. Lack of Records.
3. Failure of Requester to Reasonably Describe Record.
4. Other Failures by Requesters to Comply with Published Rules and/or
Directives. .
5. Request Withdrawn by Requester.
(See following page for description of each category)

4



Item 10 A

Availability of Records
(New categories or segregable portions of records now being released)

Nuclear Weapons Accidents/Incidents (Portions) - - OSD
Procurement Histories - - AF

Arnold Engineering Development Center Test Facility Handbook - - AF

20



SUMMARY OF
‘ REPORT TO THE CONGRESS

FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION

| CY 1976



Item 3

(Cont'd)
. B. Other Authority Denials
Number of Officials Categorized ; Total
Agency by Instances of Participation Officials

Number of Instances

1 2-3 4-5 6-10 11-20 21-4041 +
osD/Ics 16 10 4 6 2 0 2 40
DEPT ARMY 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 18
DEPT NAVY 3 24 6 3 4 2 Cy) 42
DEPT AF not reported*
DCA ° 0 0 0 1 ° 0 1
DCAA C) 0 1 ty) 0 0 0 1
DIA 1 ty) 0 1 Cy) 0 1 3
DIS Cy) 1 0 0 Cy) 0 1 2
DMA 2 ° 1 0 0 Cy) 0 3
DNA Cy) Cy) 0 0 0 0 Cy) 0
DSA 1 2 3 1 2 “1 1 1.
NSA t) 0 0 Cy) Cy) 0 1 1
DCPA 0 Cy) ry) 1 0 Cy) 0 1
DoD Total 26 40 16 15 12 6 8 123

o 21.1% of the officials participated once.
o 57,8% of the officials participated 2-10 times.

o 21.1% of the officials participated 11 or more times.

* Other category determination processing is not limited to statutory
exemption denial authorities.



Item 3

Initial Denial Officials by Participation
(Agency Reports list Names and Titles)

A. Exemption Denials

Officials Number of Officials Categorized Total
Agency Authorized by Instances of Participation Officials

Number of Instances

12-3) 4-5 — 6-10 11-40 41 +

osp/scs 32 12 10 3 1 2 0 28
DEPT ARMY 24 2 2 21 3 8 5 21
DEPT NAVY 99 123009 #7 6 4 2 4.
DEPT AF 107 238 4 6 19 3 63
DCA 1 oo 2 0 0 Co) . 1
DCAA 7 0 2: «Oo 1 1 0 4
DIA 4 1 3 1 2 t) 0) 7
DIS 2 0 Oo 0 1 0 te) 1
DMA 22 o ul 1 0 ° to) 2
DNA 1 0 0 Oo 0 0 oO. 0
DSA 52 3. 5 2 3 3 f) 16
NSA 1 Cn ee) 0 0 1 1
DCPA 1 1 oo fe) fe) (0) (e} 1
~ DoD Total 353 55 40 20 23 37 1 186

° 52.7% of the 353 IDA authorized were involved in exemption denials.
° 29.6% of the officials participated once.
o 44.6% of the officials participated 2-10 times.

o 25.8% of the officials participated 11 or more times.

6°



DEPT AF

DCA

DCAA

DIA

DIS

DSA

DNA

A 24 minute color film has been developed which is
designed to create an interest in and understanding
of the Freedom of Information Act. The film has
received a wide viewing throughout the Air Force

and will continue to be viewed on a priority basis.
Additionally, personnel have attended FOIA Workshops
sponsored by the U.S. Civil Service Commission and
the Federal Bar Association. The FOIA has been the
subject of briefings at various conferences throughout
the Air Force as a means of broadening personnel under-
Standing of the FOIA and USAF policies in support of
the Act.

Provided a 45 minute briefing to all newly assigned
personnel on the FOIA.

Each of the six regional headquarters established a

new position which encompasses all aspects of the FOIA.
Specifically, these individuals will provide training to
regional office personnel, as well as make frequent trips
to each field audit office to provide training and guidance
to those employees.

There was increased participation by Command Elements in
stressing importance of the FOIA. Compliance with the
Act is an item on the agenda of The Inspector General.

Incoming agents undergoing training received formal
instruction in the FOIA.

Maximum use of internal communication means was used to
disseminate information relative to the FOIA. Headquarters
and Component Counsel and public affairs personnel assisted
in the educational process.

Instructional and educational efforts focused on attendance
and participation in seminars and panels by interested
personnel. .

All assigned FOI representatives participate in a mandatory
annual briefing relative to the Act.

27



DoD

OSD/ICS

DEPT ARMY

DEPT NAVY

Item 11

FOIA Instructional and Educational Efforts

In 1976, the Interservice Training Review Organization was
tasked to develop a common exportable FOIA training package
for use throughout the Department of Defense. This training
package will provide broad-based, effective training to DoD
personnel on their obligations, rights, and responsibilities
under FOIA. The Assistant General Counsel for Manpower,
Health, and Public Affairs, in addition to serving as a
panelist on numerous seminars and conferences, hosted 11

DoD FOIA legal Working Group meetings. On a broader scale,
periodic conferences were continued for DoD program officials.

Instruction to employees involved in the implementation of
the FOIA program was augmented during 1976 within the Office
of the Secretary of Defense and Organization of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff through conferences for program officials;
notification concerning Civil Service Commission FOIA course
offerings; and a standard procedure to brief newly appointed
program officials and other employees upon request. . Personnel
from the FOIA Program Director's office continued to brief
Senior Service College staff, faculty, and student bodies.
Additionally, they attended several FOIA conferences,
symposia, and seminars conducted by both federal and
private agencies.

As part of an intensive two-year educational effort, the
Office of the Secretary of the Army has provided educational
seminars as well as having stressed responsive and procedural
efforts in responding to FOIA requests from the public.
Policies, practices, and procedures relative “to the FOIA

are continually reviewed to insure conformity to the Act.

At The Judge Advocate General's School, FOIA instruction is
presented to the JAGC basic, advanced, and various continuing
legal education courses. This school has developed a two
and one-half day continuing legal education course for

JAGC attorneys on Government Information Practices which
will be presented in 1977 for the first time.

The Air Force film concerning the Act was shown extensively
to concerned military and civilian personnel. Navy field
activities capitalized on the seminars and symposia sponsored
by the Civil Service Commission as a vehicle for information
relative to the Act. As part of the annual Judge Advocate
General Conference, two one-hour seminars were presented
regarding the Act, implementing instructions, and recent

case developments.

26



tem 2(b)

Statutes Invoked on Initial Determinations

Statute Number _of times by Agency Total

OsD/scs

DEPT ARMY

DEPT NAVY
AF

DNA

DSA

NSA

DCPA

fe gags

Public Law 86-36 1020 == 107

w
1
‘
‘
)
'
‘
‘
‘
‘
'

Title 16 U.S.C. 798 rs rn; 80
Title 18 U.s.c. 1905 29 101 - 3 = = = = = = = 24
Title 50 U.S.C. 403 w“wi- - - - 2+ - + += 2 - 94
Title 10 U.S.C. 2304 a 1
Agency Totals 22 10 11 1 0 3 2 0 © © 0 257 0 306*

* Total exceeds number of instances Exemption 3 was invoked because of cases
where two or more statutes were cited.



*

5400.7 (Encl 2)
Feb 14, 75

UNIFORM AGENCY FEES FOR SEARCH AND DUPLICATION UNDER
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AMENDMENTS
P. L. 93-502

Introduction

This enclosure describes fees for search and duplication. It is not
intended to substitute for any schedule of fees or a policy of not to

charge a fee established in connection with the issuance of publica-

tions or other materials in the routine course of business of a
component.

SCHEDULE OF FEES

Duplication

Publications, Forms and Reports

Shelf stock of printed or microfiche medium (requesters may be
furnished more than one copy of a publication or form if it does not
deplete stock levels below projected planned usage).

*Minimum fee, per request. . 2... 1. + + + + + $2.00
plus
Forms, per copy... . Se ee eee 05
Publications, per printed page. . . . . - . se ee O01”
Microfiche, per fiche. . . 2... 1 2 ee ee ee - 06
Reports, per printed page. . . see -05

(Examples: Cost of 20 forms, $3. 00; ‘cost “of a printed
publication with 100 pages, $3.00; cost of a microfiche
publication consisting of 10 fiche, $2.60)

Office Copy Reproduction (when shelf stock is not available)

* Minimum charge up to six reproduced pages. . . . . $ 2.00
*Minimum charge, first fiche. . . 2. 1 ee ee ee 5.00
Each additional page . .. . . . wee ee ee 05
Each additional fiche . 2. 2. 1 1 1 1 ee eee ee +10

Other Issuances

* Minimum charge up to six pages se ee $ 2.00
Each additional page . 2. 0. 1 ee ee ee ee -05
Under Revision 17



anne I a LD SSL WS — Hd wea) pea seT Tes :
T60"0zL'> vo  6LE'T f BOt'Lty | CLL‘ ORE 6 Oze'T AYSD Fore seey Teron . oA
! | avuuns
sees: at: ro ee a <=
+
cop'se v8 I oO set’ ° oO (938 ‘zogndwoo
| Teavaa ‘Teasod sv yons swoay jo Guyaxod
: i 1 ~ax AzeQUNTOA) 51s09 BuUTALVZedo 794320 TAT
a SS gasoo zoys0 30 te30u "a
a i fe iO test | spzoo0x poqutizd 30 3509 ‘9D
1 Lore” = - is) _t Tuer | s3so0p uoTzonpoadoy ‘a
Zs Eve j oor eer ece eee 83502 owya yorees reandwoo ‘Vv
+ Hl B3SOD paezeTeY ssey T9470 it
i
i i .
—Dinizdety eet! ote"zer | ace" eze piso. jsuuovieu jo Teao, a =
292758 pea 14 i __evs"ee | ¥Sg7S9 (sz) 9382 peeyzen0 5 °
pst’ sty'é + 6%6 eot‘pst | Pep 19 DIT pue qIr 30 TRIO, “Ga
a= dota. | _ ope ____i__ oro’ee__| _ __voe’ar J ye303 3509 znoyuen (9)
ta aeisot 2 eet tet atest sotatatazov zey30 (Ss)
5c nn dozdj Wz0g 9 7892709 (py)
= 262/502 i EE — seer TS aieteT J yeaordde ¥ uotawuTpz009. (€)
-- teil it ee Lore | Buystoxe 9 moraed” (2),
616’ Set - 68t 09862 ‘s$z’Ot aut yoreas (tT)
H | (soaez atnpeyos 9a3) A106030"0 Aq
weoes H - H sanoyuvu poreuzyse jo 9509 *D
; f ST TOOT ee 7 (pezeprsuce sepuz6) savaktew jo 3800 “a
wo berets f_- rot --b- suet + = FE 8 ~--b--$--4- so savaAuru poavutasa ‘Vv
i | se°rt ° ! i $3809 Touuoszeg ‘IT
a a —_——— mem as
I Hl {203083 3809 x s3senboa 50 *Oj4i)
\ | passeoord sqsanboy out @noy WT
TeIOy, pues wand TSN i aol WN Wad ‘Std \ ANT ‘bso

SZIINAOW ONILNOdaE



Agency

Abbreviation

osD/JCS

Dept Army

Dept Navy

Dept AF

DCA

DCAA

DIA

DIS

DNA

DSA

NSA

DCPA

Department of Defense

FOI Appeal and Program Officials

Appellate
Authority

Alan Woods
Ass't SecDef Public Affairs

General Counsel
Secretary of the Army

Judge Advocate General/
General Counsel for
Secretary of the Navy

Thomas W. Nelson
Admin Ass't to the
Secretary of the Air Force

Lt Gen Lee M. Paschall, Jr.,
USAF, Director

Harry W. Kettles
Ass't Director of Resources

John Brock
DIA Counsel

Bernard J. O'Donnell
Acting Director

Maj Gen James A. Young»
USAF, Deputy Director

Lt Gen Warren D. Johnson,
USAF, Director

Lt Gen W. W. Vaughan, USA
Director

Wm. H. Jenkins
Appellate, FOI/Privacy

John E. Davis
Director

Program
Official

Charles W. Hinkle
Director, FOI and Security
Reviey, OASD/PA

S. J. Pomrenze
Chief, Records Mgmt Division
Office of The Adjutant General

W. M. Kinkaid

Deputy Director,
Naval Records Memt Div.,
OPNAV

Charles C. Ratcliffe
OPR for Freedom of Information
Documentation Systems Division

John T. Whealen
General Counsel

Ms. Lee Taylor
Records Administrator

R. Herbert Holzbauer
Reference Library Branch
Central Reference Division
Deputy Director for Support

LTC Dale L. Hartig
Ass't for Information

B. C. Wimberly
General Counsel

Maj W. A. Knapp, USA
Public Affairs Officer

Colonel J. McAleer, Jr.
Staff Director, Administration

Norman Boardman
Policy Staff Officer

Walter A. Girstantas
Ass't Dir for Admin Services



Item _5(b)

Statutes Invoked on Initial Determinations

Statute Number of times by Agency Total

i

8 a5

S  f <

aqaia & a << ¢ a

SEES 2 ae a 68 48
Public Law 86-36 - fe - - = = = = = 28 = 28
Title 18 U.S.C. 798 - > = - oe ee ee 8K 25
Title 18U.S.c.1905 - - - 4 - 2 = = = = = = = 5
Title 50 U.S.C. 403 lo- - - = = = = = = 25 = 26
Agency Totals 1 4 1 78 g4*

- * Total exceeds number of instances Exemption 3 was invoked because of cases

where two or more statutes were cited.

10



Item 6

Participation of Appellate Authorities
(those responsible for denials in whole or in part)

No. of Instances

Name Title of Participation
- Exemptions Other

OSD/JCS

William I. Greener, Jr. Assistant Secretary of 7 7

Defense (Public Affairs)

Alan Woods Assistant Secretary of 2
Defense (Public Affairs)

Tod R. Hullin Principal Deputy 1
Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Public Affairs)

DEPT ARMY
Secretary of the Army 82 22
DEPT NAVY
E. Gray Lewis General Counsel 7 9
Harvy Wilcox Deputy General Counsel 21 2
Cc. E. McDowell, RADM, Judge Advocate General (Acting) 31 5
USN
_William 0. Miller, RADM, Judge Advocate General 24 6
USN
DEPT AF
Thomas W. Nelson Administrative Assistant 34 0
. Secretary of the Air Force
Eldon L. McColl Deputy Administrative 138 4
Assistant, Secretary of the
. Air Force
DCA
Lee M. Paschall, Jr., Director, DCA te) 2
LtGen, USAF

12



Department of Defense .
Reporting Agencies under the Freedom of Information Act
(as of December 31, 1976)

. Agency
Abbreviation enc Agency Head
osD/Jcs Office of the Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
. of Defense

Dept Army Secretary of the Army Martin R. Hoffmann

Dept Navy Secretary of the Navy J. William Middendorf

Dept AF - Secretary of the Thomas C. Reed
Air Force

DCA Defense Communications Lt Gen Lee M. Paschall, Jr.,
Agency USAF

DCAA Defense Contract Audit Frederick Newman
Agency

DIA Defense Intelligence Lt Gen Samuel V. Wilson, USA
Agency Director

DIS Defense Investigative Bernard J. O'Donnell
Service (Acting Director)

DMA Defense Mapping Agency VADM Shannon D. Cramer, Jr.,

USN

DNA Defense Nuclear Agency Lt Gen Warren D. Johnson, USAF

DSA Defense Supply Agency Lt Gen W. W. Vaughan, USA

NSA National Security Agency Lt Gen Lew Allen, Jr., USAF

Central Security Service
DCPA Defense Civil Preparedness John E. Davis

Agency



Item 10 B
Calendar Year Costs and Fees Collected

Reporting Annual

- Activity Annual Cost* Fees Collected
osD/scs $486 ,073.00 $3,152.81

. DEPT ARMY 1,545 ,284.00 67,244.37
DEPT NAVY 484,715.00 25,556.00
DEPT AF 1,292,135.00 53,652.00
DCA 877.00 434.72
DCAA 64,859.00 772.00
DIA 77,052.00 6,531.59
DIS 1,554.00 11.00
DMA 1,320.00 114.55
DNA 971.00 22.05
DSA 346,772.00 39,268.38
NSA 417,100.00 0)
DCPA 1,379.00 0
DoD Total $4,720,091.00 $196,759.47

* Based on reporting procedures established April 1, 1975 to capture a
"best estimate" cost of administering FOIA as amended. The attached
cost outline provides a breakdown of costs by agency.



OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20901

March 1, 1977

This Summary Report has been issued as an overview of
Department of Defense performance in the Freedom of
Information Program in Calendar Year 1976 required by
subsection 3(d), Section 552 of Title 5, United States
Code. The enclosed pages were included with the
thirteen separate Defense agency reports transmitted
to Congress as the "Report to the Congress, Freedom of
Information, CY 1976."

Data on each item required by Congress are presented
in chart and statistical form reflecting overall agency
and DoD totals.

Director, Freedom of Information
and Security Review



Reporting
Activity

Item 10 C

Time Limit Extensions by Agency

I
Unusual Circumstances
Location Volume Consultation

II & IIt
Court
Involvement

Total

OsD/IJCS
DEPT ARMY
DEPT NAVY
DEPT AF

DCA

6 4 20

i) oO 0

10

0

O

30

ce)

39

338

(100%)



Item 4

Number of Appeals and Results

- Reporting
Activity Number of Appeals

+ Granted Granted _ in Part Denied Total
osb/scs 4 6 il “mn 21
DEPT ARMY 25 65 39 (22) 129
DEPT NAVY * 15 59 46 (22) 120
DEPT AF 12 63 113 (4) 1ss
DCA to) te) 2 (2) 2
DCAA 0 13 4 (0) : 17
DIA Ce) 2 8 6) 10
DIS 0 Co) 0 (0) to)
DMA to) 0 1 (i) 1
DNA 0 0 o (0) 0
DSA 1 2 7 (3) 10
NSA 0 2 30 (5) 32
DCPA 0) () o- (0) Co)
DoD ‘Total 57 212 - 261 (72)* 530

* This number of determinatiors for other reasons (see Item 5(c)) is included in
the Denied column. Total appeals denied by exemption equals 189.



Item 5(c)

Other Reasons Cited on Appeal Determinations

. Reporting
Activities Category* . Total
1 2 3 4 5.
OSD/JCS 0 0 i) 1 6 7
DEPT ARMY 2 4 i} 1 15 22
DEPT NAVY 4 13 1 4 ie} 22
DEPT AF e) 3 i} to) 1 4
DCA ie} oO 0 2 Oo 2
DCAA ie) ie} ) 0 O oO
DIA 2 4 O 0 e} 6
DIS e} 0 i} to) ie} , oO
DMA 0 0 Oo 1) 1 1
DNA 0 ie) ie} fo io) Oo
DSA oO oO oO 0O 3 3
NSA (0) 2 Oo 1 2 5
DCPA oO Oo : 0 Oo Oo O°
DoD Totals 8 26 1 9 28 72

* 1. Transferred Appeal.
2. Lack of Records.
3. Failure of Requester to Reasonably Describe Record.
4. Other Failures by Requesters to Comply with Published Rules
and/or Directives.
5. Appeal Withdrawn by Requester.
(See Item 2(c) for description of each category)

1i