alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 303 appear at 64 FR 6249, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 303.69 Requests by agents or attorneys of the United States for information from the Federal Parent Locator Service (PLS). ( a ) Agents or attorneys of the United States may request information directly from the Federal PLS in connection with a parental kidnapping or child custody case. (See § 303.15(a) of this part for a definition of persons authorized to request the information.)
( b ) All requests under this section shall be made in the manner and form prescribed by the Office.
( c ) All requests under this section shall contain the information specified in § 303.70(d) of this part.
( d ) All requests under this section shall be accompanied by a statement, signed by the agent or attorney of the United States, attesting to the following: ( 1 ) The request is being made solely to locate an individual in connection with a parental kidnapping or child custody case.
( 2 ) Any information obtained through the Federal PLS shall be treated as confidential, shall be used solely for the purpose for which it was obtained and shall be safeguarded.
( e ) A fee may be charged to cover the costs of processing requests for information. A separate fee may be charged to cover costs of searching for a social security number before processing a request for location information.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0258) [48 FR 38645, Aug. 25, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 37731, Oct. 24, 1986; 75 FR 81907, Dec. 29, 2010]
§ 150.429 Computation of time and extensions of time. ( a ) For purposes of this subpart, in computing any period of time, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default and includes the last day of the period unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal government, in which event it includes the next business day. When the period of time allowed is less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays observed by the Federal government are excluded from the computation.
( b ) The period of time for filing any responsive pleading or papers is determined by the date of receipt (as defined in § 150.401) of the submission to which a response is being made.
( c ) The ALJ may grant extensions of the filing deadlines specified in these regulations or set by the ALJ for good cause shown (except that requests for extensions of time to file a request for hearing may be granted only on the grounds specified in section § 150.405(b)).
99–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–657 

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO 

THE BILL (H.R. 1722) TO REQUIRE THE HEAD OF EACH EXECUTIVE 

AGENCY TO ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT A POLICY UNDER WHICH EMPLOYEES SHALL BE AUTHORIZED TO TELEWORK, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1721] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1721, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendment to H.R. 1722, the Telework Improvements Act of 2010. 

The resolution makes in order a motion offered by the chair of the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform that the House 

concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1722. The resolution provides one hour of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The resolution 

waives all points of order against consideration of the motion except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the Senate amendment shall be considered as read. Finally, the resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions 

that the House suspend the rules at any time through the legislative day of November 19, 2010. The Speaker or her designee shall 

consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration under suspension of the rules 

pursuant to this resolution. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion (except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI) the 

Committee is not aware of any points of order against the motion. 

The waiver of all points of order against the motion is prophylactic. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 500 

Date: November 17, 2010. 

Measure: Senate amendment to H.R. 1722. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To make in order and provide the appropriate waivers for a substitute amendment if offered by Representative Issa of California or his designee. 

Results: Defeated 2–7. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; 

Cardoza—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Perlmutter—Nay; Polis—Nay; 

Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart, L.—Yea; Slaughter—Nay. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
§ 2508.14 What are the identification requirements for individuals who request access to records? The Corporation shall require reasonable identification of all individuals who request access to records to ensure that records are disclosed to the proper person. ( a ) In the event an individual requests disclosure in person, such individual shall be required to show an identification card such as a drivers license, etc., containing a photo and a sample signature of such individual. Such individual may also be required to sign a statement under oath as to his or her identity, acknowledging that he or she is aware of the penalties for improper disclosure under the provisions of the Privacy Act.
( b ) In the event that disclosure is requested by mail, the Corporation may request such information as may be necessary to reasonably ensure that the individual making such request is properly identified. In certain cases, the Corporation may require that a mail request be notarized with an indication that the notary received an acknowledgment of identity from the individual making such request.
( c ) In the event an individual is unable to provide suitable documentation or identification, the Corporation may require a signed notarized statement asserting the identity of the individual and stipulating that the individual understands that knowingly or willfully seeking or obtaining access to records about another person under false pretenses is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.
( d ) In the event a requestor wishes to be accompanied by another person while reviewing his or her records, the Corporation may require a written statement authorizing discussion of his or her records in the presence of the accompanying representative or other persons.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-419 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MONTENEGRO 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Podgorica April 17 and 19, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MONTENEGRO 

 International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Podgorica 

 April 17 and 19, 2007; 

 Entered into force April 19, 2007.
*N.*Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Otto Steinberg agt. John O’Conner.

Where the facts alleged in the complaint, and on which the equities for a preliminary *injunction*are founded, arc all positively denied by the answer, and it appears to be extremely doubtful whether the plaintiff will ultimately be entitled to the relief demanded, the injunction cannot be sustained.

*General Term, March,*1871.

*Before*Robinson, Loew, and J. F. Daly, *JJ.*

Appeal from an order of the Special Term denying a motion to vacate a preliminary injunction restraining the Justice of a District Court *from*issuing a warrant of dispossession in summary proceedings.

Joseph Fettretch, *for the defendant and appellant.*

H. Allen, *for the plaintiff and respondent.*

Loew, J.

We think it is clear that the injunction in this

case cannot stand.

The facts alleged in the complaint, and on which the equities thereof are founded, are all positively denied by the answer, and besides, it appears to ns extremely doubtful whether the plaintiff will ultimately he entitled to the relief he demands.

It is well settled that in such a case a preliminary injunction will not be sustained.

The order appealed from should he reversed and the preliminary injunction dissolved.

Robinson and J. F. Daly, *JJ.,*concurred. *55revive the suit against the wishes of the plaintiffs. That the Code contained no provision for the revival of an action abated by the death of the defendant, except on the motion of the plaintiff *(Keene agt. La*Farge, 1 *Bosw.,*671; *Seaboard and R. R. R.*agt. *Ward,*18 *Barb.,*595; *Cooke*agt. *Beach,*25 *How.,*356).
#### John W. Daly, Respondent, *v.*Paul F. Reineldt et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

*Daly*v. *Reineldt,*121 App. Div. 918, affirmed.

(Argued November 23, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 23, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

*George M. S. Schulz*and *Louis S. Goebel*for appellants.

*John M. Digney*for respondent.

’ Judgment affirmed, with'costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ.
#### Walsh’s License.

Argued May 12, 1914.

Appeal, No. 29, April T., 1914, by W. L. Amo and O. G. Moore, Remonstrants, from order of Q. S. Clarion Co., Feb. T., 1914, No. 8, License Docket, granting a retail liquor license.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head, Porter, Henderson, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.

Affirmed.

Petition for a retail liquor license.

*Error assigned*was order granting the license.

*F. J. Maffeit,*of *Maffett & Rimer,*with him *Corbett & Rugh,*for appellants.

*A. A. Geary,*with him *W. W. Hindman,*for appellee.

July 15, 1914:

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The same question is presented in this appeal which was considered and determined in In re Application of R. H. Edmonson, in an opinion this day filed, ante, p. 355. Each of the applications was for a license to sell liquor at retail in the borough of Edinburg, Clarion county, and the same argument is presented in each case.

For the reasons given in the case of Edmonson the order of the court is affirmed in this case at the cost of the appellants.
#### Moritz Walter et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Emanuel Walter, Deceased, Respondents, *v.*Herman N. Walter et al., Defendants, and Mary Frank et al., Appellants.

*Walter*v. *Walter,*133 App. Div. 893, affirmed.

(Submitted January 25, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 28, 1909, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Emanuel Walter, deceased.

*607
      *Benjamin G. Paskus, Norman P. S. Schloss*and *Emil Goldmark*for appellants.

*John Frankenheimer*and *Henry Walter*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion'.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Amendment of meeting announcement, dated November 28, 2006. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the announcement of the tenth meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT).

# DATES:

December 12, 2006, from 8:30 to 11:30 a.m.

*Meeting Format:*                         This meeting was originally scheduled to be held in the Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800. However, the meeting format has  been changed to provide remote participation only (Web cast and/or telephone) for the Community members, HHS staff, invited presenters, and general public. A time period will be allotted before the conclusion of the meeting for the general public to deliver brief (3 minutes or less) oral public comment.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The agenda includes an update on the Personalized Healthcare Workgroup; a panel discussion on the American Health Information Management Association's State Steering Committee Recommendations; and an update on the National Health Information Network (NHIN). The instructions to participate remotely (Web cast and/or telephone) can be found at                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​m20061212.html.*                     If you have any questions concerning the remote instructions or meeting format, please call (866) 505-3500.                

Dated: November 30, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-9549 Filed 12-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 9, 2010  |   | By:    | /s/  Neil K. Warma                                                                                      |
|                         |   |   | Neil K. WarmaPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Acting Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
§ 180.30 Applicability. ( a ) *General applicability.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the requirements of this part apply to hospitals as defined at § 180.20.
( b ) *Exception.* Federal and State hospitals are deemed by CMS to be in compliance with the requirements of this part including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Federally owned hospital facilities, including facilities operated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Military Treatment Facilities operated by the U.S. Department of Defense.
( 2 ) Hospitals operated by an Indian Health Program as defined in section 4(12) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act.
( 3 ) State forensic hospitals that provide treatment exclusively to individuals who are in the custody of penal authorities.
( c ) *Online availability.* Unless otherwise stated, hospital charge information must be made public electronically via the internet.
[84 FR 65602, Nov. 27, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 63998, Nov. 16, 2021]
#### Lewis v. Van Campen, appellant.

*Evidence—letters.*

Letters to the plaintiff by one not a party to the action which were never acted upon or answered by plaintiff, *held,*properly excluded.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Albin A. Lewis against George Yan Campen, to recover for a quantity of lumber sold and delivered.

*D. H. Bolles,*for appellant.

*Angel & Jones,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The head-note states the only point passed upon in the opinion, which holds that upon the findings of fact, the decision of the referee should be sustained.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# CongressionalCandidate Table10g

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/11/20.
§ 2105.23 What if the requested records contain both exempt and nonexempt material? If responsive records contain both exempt and nonexempt material, the Agency will consult with legal counsel, as discussed in § 2105.21(c). After consultation, the Agency will partially grant and partially deny the request by: ( a ) Segregating and releasing the nonexempt information, unless the nonexempt material is so intertwined with the exempt material that disclosure of it would leave only meaningless words and phrases;
( b ) Indicating on the released portion of the record the amount of information deleted and the FOIA exemption under which the deletion was made, unless doing so would harm an interest protected by the FOIA exemption used to withhold the information; and
( c ) If technically feasible, indicating the amount of information deleted and the FOIA exemption under which the deletion was made at the place in the record where the deletion was made.
§ 410.1305 Staff, training, and case manager requirements. ( a ) Standard programs, restrictive placements, and post-release service (PRS) providers shall provide training to all staff, contractors, and volunteers, to ensure that they understand their obligations under ORR regulations in this part and policies and are responsive to the challenges faced by staff and unaccompanied children. Standard programs and restrictive placements shall ensure that staff are appropriately trained on its behavior management strategies, including de-escalation techniques, as established pursuant to § 410.1304. All trainings should be tailored to the unique needs, attributes, and gender of the unaccompanied children in care at the individual care provider facility. Standard programs, restrictive placements, and PRS providers must document the completion of all trainings in personnel files. All staff, contractors, and volunteers must have completed required background checks and vetting for their respective roles required by ORR;
( b ) Care provider facilities shall meet the staff to child ratios established by their respective States or other licensing entities; and
( c ) Care provider facilities shall have case managers based on site at the facility.
§ 242.7 Restriction on use. ( a ) You may not use fish or wildlife or their parts, taken pursuant to the regulations in this part, unless provided for in this part.
( b ) You may not exchange in customary trade or sell fish or wildlife or their parts, taken pursuant to the regulations in this part, unless provided for in this part.
( c ) You may barter fish or wildlife or their parts, taken pursuant to the regulations in this part, unless restricted in §§ 242.25, 242.26, 242.27, or 242.28.
**Exhibit 31.1**


DEPOSITOR’S
      CERTIFICATION




I,
      James
      Zollo, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GE-WMC
      Mortgage Securities, L.L.C., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series
      2006-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this annual report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.  Based
      on
      my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under
      Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
      reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
      agreement in all material respects; and




5.  All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
      otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
      described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
      10-K.




In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by the following unaffiliated parties: Litton Loan Servicing LP and The Bank
      of
      New York.




Date:
      March 28, 2008




/s/
      James
      Zollo


By: James
      Zollo


Title:  Vice
      President (Senior Officer of Depositor


in
      Charge of
      Securitization)
#### § 1640.3 Contractual agreement.

As a condition of receiving LSC funds, a recipient must enter into a written agreement with the Corporation that, with respect to its LSC funds, will subject the recipient to the applicable Federal laws relating to the proper use of Federal funds. The agreement must include a statement that all of the recipient's employees and board members have been informed of such Federal law and of the consequences of a violation of such law, both to the recipient and to themselves as individuals.