alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Civ. No. 12916.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

November 27, 1940.]

#### FRANK A. LA FOND, Appellant, v. RATH PACKING COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Parker & Stanbury and Hansen *&*Sweeney for Appellant.

Irving E. Read for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The respondents having filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by Rule VI of this court, *957and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by the said certificate and by the authorities cited,

It hereby is ordered that this appeal be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.
#### § 164.304 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the following terms have the following meanings:

*Access* means the ability or the means necessary to read, write, modify, or communicate data/information or otherwise use any system resource. (This definition applies to “access” as used in this subpart, not as used in subparts D or E of this part.)

*Administrative safeguards* are administrative actions, and policies and procedures, to manage the selection, development, implementation, and maintenance of security measures to protect electronic protected health information and to manage the conduct of the covered entity's or business associate's workforce in relation to the protection of that information.

*Authentication* means the corroboration that a person is the one claimed.

*Availability* means the property that data or information is accessible and useable upon demand by an authorized person.

*Confidentiality* means the property that data or information is not made available or disclosed to unauthorized persons or processes.

*Encryption* means the use of an algorithmic process to transform data into a form in which there is a low probability of assigning meaning without use of a confidential process or key.

*Facility* means the physical premises and the interior and exterior of a building(s).

*Information system* means an interconnected set of information resources under the same direct management control that shares common functionality. A system normally includes hardware, software, information, data, applications, communications, and people.

*Integrity* means the property that data or information have not been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner.

*Malicious software* means software, for example, a virus, designed to damage or disrupt a system.

*Password* means confidential authentication information composed of a string of characters.

*Physical safeguards* are physical measures, policies, and procedures to protect a covered entity's or business associate's electronic information systems and related buildings and equipment, from natural and environmental hazards, and unauthorized intrusion.

*Security or Security measures* encompass all of the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards in an information system.

*Security incident* means the attempted or successful unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction of information or interference with system operations in an information system.

*Technical safeguards* means the technology and the policy and procedures for its use that protect electronic protected health information and control access to it.

*User* means a person or entity with authorized access.

*Workstation* means an electronic computing device, for example, a laptop or desktop computer, or any other device that performs similar functions, and electronic media stored in its immediate environment.

[68 FR 8376, Feb. 20, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 42767, Aug. 24, 2009; 78 FR 5693, Jan. 25, 2013]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The MONY Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael I. Roth, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY Group Inc.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL I. ROTH
|Michael I. Roth       



May 10, 2004



This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to
the Report.
§ 155.545 Appeal decisions. ( a ) *Appeal decisions.* Appeal decisions must— ( 1 ) Be based exclusively on the information and evidence specified in § 155.535(e) and the eligibility requirements under subpart D or G of this part, as applicable, and if the Medicaid or CHIP agencies delegate authority to conduct the Medicaid fair hearing or CHIP review to the appeals entity in accordance with 42 CFR 431.10(c)(1)(ii) or 457.1120, the eligibility requirements under 42 CFR parts 435 and 457, as applicable;
( 2 ) State the decision, including a plain language description of the effect of the decision on the appellant's eligibility;
( 3 ) Summarize the facts relevant to the appeal;
( 4 ) Identify the legal basis, including the regulations that support the decision;
( 5 ) State the effective date of the decision; and
( 6 ) If the appeals entity is a State Exchange appeals entity— ( i ) Provide an explanation of the appellant's right to pursue the appeal before the HHS appeals entity, including the applicable timeframe, if the appellant remains dissatisfied with the eligibility determination; and
( ii ) Indicate that the decision of the State Exchange appeals entity is final, unless the appellant pursues the appeal before the HHS appeals entity.
( b ) *Notice of appeal decision.* The appeals entity— ( 1 ) Must issue written notice of the appeal decision to the appellant within 90 days of the date an appeal request under § 155.520(b) or (c) is received, as administratively feasible.
( 2 ) In the case of an appeal request submitted under § 155.540 that the appeals entity determines meets the criteria for an expedited appeal, must issue the notice as expeditiously as reasonably possible, consistent with the timeframe established by the Secretary.
( 3 ) Must provide notice of the appeal decision and instructions to cease pended eligibility to the appellant, if applicable, via secure electronic interface, to the Exchange or the Medicaid or CHIP agency, as applicable.
( c ) *Implementation of appeal decisions.* The Exchange, upon receiving the notice described in paragraph (b), must promptly— ( 1 ) Implement the appeal decision effective— ( i ) Prospectively, on the first day of the month following the date of the notice of appeal decision, or consistent with § 155.330(f)(2), (3), (4), or (5), if applicable; or
( ii ) Retroactively, to the coverage effective date the appellant did receive or would have received if the appellant had enrolled in coverage under the incorrect eligibility determination that is the subject of the appeal, at the option of the appellant.
( 2 ) Redetermine the eligibility of household members who have not appealed their own eligibility determinations but whose eligibility may be affected by the appeal decision, in accordance with the standards specified in § 155.305.
[78 FR 54136, Aug. 30, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 12345, Mar. 8, 2016]
#### § 650.5 Special patent provisions.

At the request of the prospective awardee or on recommendation from NSF staff, a Grants or Contracts Officer, with the concurrence of the cognizant Program Manager, may negotiate special patent provisions when he or she determines that exceptional circumstances require restriction or elimination of the right of a prospective awardee to retain title to any subject invention in order to better promote the policy and objectives of chapter 18 of title 35 of the United States Code or the National Science Foundation Act. The Grants or Contracts Officer will prepare the written determination required by § 401.3(e) of title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations and assure that appropriate reports are made to the Secretary of Commerce and Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration as required in § 401.3(f). Unless doing so would be inconsistent with an obligation imposed on the Foundation by statute, international agreement, or pact with other participants in or supporters of the research, every special patent provision will allow the awardee, after an invention has been made, to request that it be allowed to retain principal rights to that invention under § 650.12(e) of this regulation.
#### § 1622.7 Certification by the General Counsel.

Before a meeting or portion thereof is closed, the General Counsel shall publicly certify that, in his opinion, the meeting may be so closed to the public and shall state each relevant exemption. A copy of the certification, together with a statement from the presiding officer of the meeting setting forth the time and place of the meeting and the persons present, shall be retained by the Corporation.
#### Clark v. Shuman, appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the-verdict of a jury and from an order denying a new trial. .The action was brought in Orange county, by Henry H. Clark anfd *675another against Benjamin Shuman and others, to recover for goods sold the firm of M. Newman & Oo.

*Hilton, Campbell & Bell,*for appellants.

*Groo & Wiggins,*.for respondents.

Tapped, J.

The only question litigated was as to whether Shuman was a partner in the firm, which the jury found in favor of plaintiffs,. and the general term refused to interfere with their finding. The opinion also held that certain evidence objected to did not influence the verdict, and. that the judgment and order should be affirmed.

*Judgment and order affirmed.*
# Jurnalul Oficial L 73/2011

| | ISSN 1830-3625
  doi:10.3000/18303625.L_2011.073.ron |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | L 73 |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Legislaţie | Anul 5418 martie 2011 |

ISSN 1830-3625

doi:10.3000/18303625.L_2011.073.ron

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

L 73

Ediţia în limba română

Legislaţie

Anul 5418 martie 2011

---

| Cuprins | | II   Acte fără caracter legislativ | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACORDURI INTERNAȚIONALE |
| | * | Informare privind data intrării în vigoare a Acordului de parteneriat în domeniul pescuitului dintre Uniunea Europeană și Insulele Solomon | 1 |

Cuprins

II   Acte fără caracter legislativ

Pagina

ACORDURI INTERNAȚIONALE

*

Informare privind data intrării în vigoare a Acordului de parteneriat în domeniul pescuitului dintre Uniunea Europeană și Insulele Solomon

1

| RO | Actele ale căror titluri sunt tipărite cu caractere drepte sunt acte de gestionare curentă adoptate în cadrul politicii agricole şi care au, în general, o perioadă de valabilitate limitată.
  Titlurile celorlalte acte sunt tipărite cu caractere aldine şi sunt precedate de un asterisc. |
| --- | --- |

RO

Actele ale căror titluri sunt tipărite cu caractere drepte sunt acte de gestionare curentă adoptate în cadrul politicii agricole şi care au, în general, o perioadă de valabilitate limitată.

Titlurile celorlalte acte sunt tipărite cu caractere aldine şi sunt precedate de un asterisc.

---

II Acte fără caracter legislativ

ACORDURI INTERNAȚIONALE

| 18.3.2011 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | L 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

L 73/1

---

Informare privind data intrării în vigoare a Acordului de parteneriat în domeniul pescuitului dintre Uniunea Europeană și Insulele Solomon

La 7 decembrie 2010, Uniunea Europeană a notificat Insulele Solomon cu privire la finalizarea de către Consiliu, în numele Uniunii Europene, a procedurilor necesare pentru intrarea în vigoare a acordului menționat anterior, semnat la Bruxelles, la 21 octombrie 2010.

De asemenea, Insulele Solomon au notificat Uniunea Europeană, la 9 martie 2011, cu privire la finalizarea procedurilor de încheiere.

Prin urmare, acordul a intrat în vigoare la data de 9 martie 2011, în conformitate cu articolul 18 al acestuia.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 17, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00375

- CR

Charles D. TUTTOILMONDO Jr.

,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2246

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Appellant has filed a brief in which he contends the trial court abused its discretion by

denying his motion to suppress his statements on the ground that they were not voluntarily made. The

record does not contain the trial court’s findings and conclusions on the volu ntariness issue.

The trial court is required to make written findings of fact “in all cases concerning

voluntariness.” Vasquez v. State , 411 S.W.3d 918, 920 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The court was

obligated “to make findings and conclusions that were adequa te and complete, covering every

potentially dispositive issue that might reasonably be said to have arisen in the course of the

suppression proceedings.” State v. Elias , 339 S.W.3d 667, 676 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). This court

may not imply findings in suppo rt of the trial court’s suppression order. See id. When the trial court

fails to make such findings, the proper remedy is for the appellate court to abate the appeal and

remand to the trial court for the entry of written findings. Green v. State , 906 S.W.2 d 937, 939

- 40

(Tex. Crim. App. 1994)

We therefore abate this appeal and remand it for the trial court to make the findings of fact

and conclusions of law required by section 6 of article 38.22. We order the trial court to make its

written findings not lat er than September 4, 2018 and order the clerk of the trial court to file the

findings and conclusions with this court in a supplemental record not later than September 6, 2018

.I t so ORDERED on this 17th day of August, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 2521.90 If I am a new or replacement legal applicant for an existing program, what will my matching requirements be?

If your organization is a new or replacement legal applicant for an existing program, you must provide matching resources at the level the previous legal applicant had reached at the time you took over the program.

[70 FR 39598, July 8, 2005]
• Every Belt – Every Ride seeks to remind federal

employees of the life-saving value of seat belts

and their obligation to use the safety devices in

government vehicles, private cars and taxies,

whenever and wherever they go on public 

business.

References

1

Pegula, Paul S., Fatal Occupational Injuries to 

Government Workers, 1992-2001, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2004.

2

Pegula, Paul S., Fatal Occupational Injuries to 

Government Workers, 1992-2001, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

3

U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ 

Compensation Programs. Data prepared by OWCP 

for OSHA.

4

U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ 

Compensation Programs. Data prepared by OWCP 

for OSHA.

5

U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway 

Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for 

Statistics and Analysis, Safety Belt Use in 2003-Use 

Rates in the States and Territories.

6

U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway 

Traffic Safety Administration, National Occupant 

Protection Use Survey, June 2003.

Costs of Traffic Crashes 

• Traffic crashes are the leading cause of on-thejob fatalities in America.1

• From 1992 to 2001, half the federal workers

who died on the job lost their lives in transportation incidents.2

• In Fiscal Year 2003, at least 28 federal workers

were killed in job-related traffic crashes and

about 8,000 more were injured.3

• Over the past five years, the U.S. government

has paid out nearly $75 million in medical and

compensation costs linked to federal employee

injuries and deaths related to motor vehicle

crashes.4

Seat Belts Save Lives

• Using seat belts cuts the risk of death by 45%

for people riding in cars and by as much as 60%

for those traveling in trucks or SUVs.5

• Seat belts save 14,000 lives each year and every

state in the nation has a law mandating seat

belt use. But 20% of Americans still fail to buckle up.6

• Federal employees are required to wear seat

belts—every time they travel on public business

as passengers or drivers—by Executive Order

13043.

FactSheet

Motor Vehicle Safety Facts

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration

(OSHA) in partnership with the Department of Transportation's National Highway

Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) launched a promotional campaign, "Every Belt -

Every Ride" at the National Safety Congress, September 14, 2004 in New Orleans to

encourage federal workers to wear seat belts every time they ride in a vehicle on 

public business.

www.osha.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.17(a)

[FLOOR PLAN]

[center of plan] Tettoia = penthouse

[key, center left]

= area, open fixtures 3,522.30 square meters
= area, closed fixtures 699.40 square meters
= area, closed fixtures 1200 square meters
= area, offices (usable) 92.00 square meters
= area, laboratories (usable) 360 square meters

[title, bottom right]
FINISOLA S.p.A.
Milan, Italy
GROUND LINE PLAN
INSTALLATION AT
VIA BISTOLFI, 35
<PAGE>

[FLOOR PLAN]

= area, closed fixtures 625.86 square meters  RAISED LINE PLAN
= area, offices (usable) 218.00 square meters


[bottom left]
[DESCRIPTION] area update [DATE] 08/05/00

[title, bottom right]
FINISOLA S.p.A.
Milan, Italy
RAISED LINE PLAN
Office Building
Via Bistolfi, 35

                                       2
<PAGE>

[GENERAL PLAN]


[key, center left]

= area, open fixtures 12,046.30 square meters
= area, closed fixtures penthouses 1,212.89 square meters
= area, closed fixtures 414.37 square meters
= area, offices (usable) 1,243.15 square meters
= area, closed fixtures (Finisola), 299.89 square meters
= area, production units (usable) 710 square meters



[title, bottom right]
FINISOLA S.p.A.
Milan, Italy
GENERAL PLAN
Via dei Canzi, 1
Milan

                                       3
# We lcome To Digital AirWare Setting The Standard For Av iation

Management Digital Air

Wa re is a ground

- breaking aviation management software. W e focus on providing superior service through customizing our product around your individual needs. Simply put, what you want is what you will get.
Setting The New **STANDARD** In Aviation Records Management.

Next Generation Management Digital Air

Wa re is a ground

- breaking aviation management software. Wefocus on providing superior service through customizing our product around your individual needs. Simply put, what you want is what you will get. Read More →

Visual Alert System Our unique visual alert system gives you status updates at a glance. Green means your fleet is ready to go. Yellow means you have upcoming inspect ions and Red means there are items that need your attention now.

Pilot Profiles View and track all check rides, medical dates and all record keeping documents. Users can directl y

import their documents and auditing profiles is a snap.

Accessory TrackingOur unique Accessory and Tools menus allow you to track items outside of aircraft mainten ance.

ENG, AirTeps, Bambi Buckets, NVG, and Torque Wrenches are just some of the items already being tracked. Each items allows customized inspections when you need them. Maintenance Program Each aircraft has a unique profile that allows checking of Unlimited inspections, components, ASBs, ADs, CEBs and Discrepancies.

read more → Support System Customer Support is only one click away. We believe in closed loop communication to provide you with the status of updates. Each support request is automatically routed to the team of professionals dedicated to helping you at any time.

Attention to Details Quality is the building block of any business. Digital Air Wa re takes the extra time to understand your organization, the day to day operations of your service and provide real solutions to complex services and needs. On site training and a comprehensive We b

- inar Video Tutorial section are all included. Lo ts of Possibilities Digital Air

Wa re is committed to providing you with reliable aviation records managment where ever you are. We are strive to meet each and every one of your needs and continue to a dd features to improve your experience. A description of many of our features is available here.

 Explore Features With Digital AirWare
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-501.5 

________________________________________________________________________ 

COMPACT OF FREE ASSOCIATION 

Trust Fund 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the MARSHALL ISLANDS 

Signed at Majuro April 30, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MARSHALL ISLANDS 

 

 Compact of Free Association: Trust Fund 

 Agreement signed at Majuro April 30, 2003; 

 Entered into force May 1, 2004.
^*ia nC^^ ->\RTMbNT OF 

^ ^ -.NSPORWiON 

\A/WW . aeS s . co m - -i,--.- i'^nrTiiiiTI'"~i"0 

cBcr ^cr 

/ai! :.FP - ! A R: 25 

August 3, 2011 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director, X-50 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, SW, Room 6401 

Washington, DC 20590 

R £: Small Community Air Service Development Grant Application 

Docket OST-2011-0119 

Grand Forks Regional Airport Authority/City of Grand Forks, North Dakota 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (AE2S) is an engineering consulting firm with 

11 offices across North Dakota, Minnesota, and Montana, including our corporate office in Grand Forks, 

North Dakota. We are frequent users of the Grand Forks International Airport, and we strongly support 

the above referenced grant application. The proposed plan by the Grand Forks Regional Airport 

Authority and the City of Grand Forks for the Small Community Air Service Development Grant would 

meet the needs for additional air travel options for our business and other businesses in the Grand Forks 

community. 

Commercial air service is vitally important to our business. We believe there is a strong need for \ 

additional air service to the community, in particular the addition of service to provide direct west bound | 

travel options, rather than having to connect in Minneapolis to travel to any western destinations. j 

I also serve as the Chair of the Grand Forks Region Economic Development Corporation. The future / 

addition of a new commercial air carrier is critically important to the health and growth of the Grand ;/ 

Forks business community. The contemplated improvements will provide a significant boost to economic 

development in our community. 

Your support of this grant application is greatly appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

AE2S 

Steve L. Burian, PE 

Chief Executive Officer 

Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. 

4050 Garden View Drive Suite 200 • Grand Forks, NO 58201 • (t) 701 -746-8087 • (f) 701 -746-0370