alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

MEMORANDUM

TO: Patricia C. Orrock

 Chief Compliance Officer

 Thomas E. Hintermister

 Assistant Staff Director

 Audit Division

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic 

Acting Associate General Counsel

Policy Division

 Lorenzo Holloway 

 Assistant General Counsel

 Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Forman

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Proposed Interim Audit Report on the New Jersey Republican State Committee

(LRA 1070) 

 The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

(“proposed IAR”) on the New Jersey Republican State Committee. The proposed IAR contains 

two findings: (1) Misstatement of Financial Activity and (2) Reporting of Debts and 

Obligations.

1

 We concur with the findings. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret 

J. Forman, the attorney assigned to this audit. 

 1 We recommend that the Commission consider this document in Executive Session because the 

Commission may eventually decide to pursue an investigation of matters contained in the proposed IAR. 

11 C.F.R. §§ 2.4(a) and (b)(6).

October 30, 2018
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-929 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MAINTENANCE 

Children 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Signed at Helsinki April 3, 2006 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
FINLAND 

Maintenance: Children 

Agreement signed at Helsinki April 3, 2006; 

 Entered into force September 29, 2007.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Florida Bank Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert Rothman, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 2, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT ROTHMAN     
|                    |  |     |  | Robert Rothman         
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

                            LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT

     This Lease Extension Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between
St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation as Tenant and The Alhambra
Partners, a California limited partnership as Landlord under that certain
Industrial Real Estate Lease dated November 13, 1985 ("Lease") between Landlord
and Tenant.

                                 R E C I T A L S

A.   Pursuant to the terms of the Lease Tenant's extended lease term expires on
August 31, 2001.

B.   Tenant has the right to extend the Term of the Lease for one additional
extended term of five years.

C.   Tenant has exercised its option to extend the Lease Term to August 31, 2001
and Landlord and Tenant now desire to extend the term of and modify the
provisions of the Lease to provide Tenant the right to occupy the Property for
an additional five (5) year term on the terms and conditions of the Lease as
modified in the manner set forth below.

     In consideration of the foregoing recitals and the covenants and conditions
hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:

1.   LEASE TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be a period of five (5) years,
     ----------
     commencing September 1, 2001 and ending August 31, 2006. Tenant shall have
     the right to extend the Term for one additional five (5) year period.

2.   BASE RENT. Base Rent during the initial year of the extension Term shall be
     ---------
     $314,880.00 per year ($0.64 per square foot per month). Base Rent shall be
     increased annually on the 1st day of September of each year thereafter by
     an amount equal to 4% of the Base Rent due in August of each year.

3.   OPTION TO RENEW. Tenant shall have the right to extend the Term for one
     ---------------
     additional five (5) year period in accordance with the provisions of the
     Lease.

4.   FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. Except as modified in the manner set forth in this
     ---------------------
     Agreement, the Lease shall remain in full force and effect during the
     extension Term provided herein.

                                      -1-
<PAGE>

5.   FURTHER ASSURANCES. Each party agrees to perform any further acts and to
     ------------------
     execute and deliver any further documents which may be reasonably necessary
     to carry out the provisions of this Agreement.

Executed this 20 day of November, 2000 to be effective September 1, 2001.

Tenant:

St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation

By: /s/ Roger Ruppert
   -------------------------

Landlord:

The Alhambra Partners, a California limited partnership

By: /s/ Robert E Gray
   -------------------------
    Robert E. Gray, Trustee of The Gray Family Trust, General Partner

                                      -2-
§ 670.23 Specific issuance criteria. Permits authorizing the taking of mammals, birds, plants, or invertebrates designated as a Specially Protected Species of mammals, birds, and plants in § 670.25 may only be issued if: ( a ) There is a compelling scientific purpose for such taking;
( b ) The actions allowed under any such permit will not jeopardize the existing natural ecological system, or the survival of the affected species or population;
( c ) The taking involves non-lethal techniques, where appropriate. Lethal techniques may only be used on Specially Protected Species where there is no suitable alternative technique; and
( d ) The authorized taking, transporting, carrying or shipping will be carried out in a humane manner.
[63 FR 50164, Sept. 21, 1998, as amended at 86 FR 27988, May 25, 2021]
EXHIBIT 10.3

                      AGREEMENT BETWEEN HEALTH & NUTRITION

                           SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                       AND

                                STEVEN POMERANTZ

         THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between STEVEN POMERANTZ of 6020
N.W. 67th Court, Parkland, FL 33067 (hereinafter POMERANTZ), and HEALTH &
NUTRITION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 3750 Investment Lane, Suite 5, West Palm
Beach, Florida 33404 (hereinafter HNS and/or Company) (both referred to as
parties) on this 12th day of January, 2001, and in consideration of the mutual
promises made herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1. STEVEN POMERANTZ shall pledge a C.D. (C.D.) in the amount of
100,000.00 currently held at SunTrust Bank, Northlake Branch, North Palm Beach
County, Florida in the name of Steven Pomerantz for a loan to be obtained by HNS
in the principal amount of $100,000.00, said loan to be obtained on terms
mutually agreeable to POMERANTZ and HNS.

         2. HNS agrees that it shall abide by all terms and conditions of said
loan and shall not cause any default to occur pursuant to this agreement or
pursuant to any loan agreement with SunTrust, which shall in any way, adversely
affect the C.D. held by POMERANTZ.

         3. POMERANTZ, shall at any time be permitted to withdraw the collateral
upon thirty (30) days' written notice to HNS and, if necessary, to SunTrust, at
which time the loan will be paid in full by HNS.

         4. HNS specifically agrees that, if POMERANTZ desires to withdraw the
collateral, that it shall repay immediately all sums due and owing to SunTrust.

         5. HNS, upon receipt of the loan proceeds, shall pay to POMERANTZ, as
compensation for providing the collateral for this loan the sum of $5,000.00.

         6. In the event of any default pursuant to this Agreement, and if it is
necessary for any party to seek to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to attorney's fees and costs, all deemed to be expenses.

         7. It is further agreed by and between the parties that any action
sought to enforce this Agreement, shall be brought in Palm Beach County,
Florida.

                                     /s/ Steven Pomerantz
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                   STEVEN POMERANTZ
                                   HEALTH & NUTRITION SYSTEMS
                                   INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida corporation

                                   By:    /s/ Christopher Tisi
                                          --------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Christopher Tisi
                                          --------------------------------------
                                   Title: President
                                          --------------------------------------







                                       2
#### § 615.7 Legal proceedings between private litigants: Office of Inspector General employees.

Notwithstanding the requirements set forth in §§ 615.1 through 615.6, when an employee of the Office of Inspector General is issued a demand or receives a request to provide testimony or produce official records and information, the Inspector General or his or her designee shall be responsible for performing the functions assigned to the General Counsel with respect to such demand or request pursuant to the provisions of this part.

[73 FR 21549, Apr. 22, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.20 Establishing procedures.

A program must establish procedures to protect the confidentiality of any personally identifiable information (PII) in child records.
§ 2101.2 Relationships of Commission's functions to responsibilities of other government units. ( a ) *Projects involving the Capitol building and the Library of Congress.* Plans concerning the Capitol building and the buildings of the Library of Congress are outside the purview of the Commission except as to questions on which the Committees of Congress require the Commission to advise.
( b ) *Other Federal government projects.* Officers and departments of the federal government responsible for finally approving or acting upon proposed projects within the purview of the Commission's functions as described in § 2101.1 (a) are required first to submit plans or designs for such projects to the Commission for its advice and comments.
( c ) *Projects within the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia government.* The District of Columbia seeks Commission advice on exterior alteration or new construction of public buildings or major public works within its boundaries. The District of Columbia government also shall seek Commission advice on certain private construction requiring building or demolition permits from the D.C. Permit Branch (D.C. Law 5-422). These include certain actions by the District of Columbia government pursuant to either D.C. Law 5-422 or D.C. Law 2-144 within areas subject to the Shipstead-Luce or Old Georgetown Acts (§ 2101.1 (b) and (c)) prior to the issuance of a permit.[2] Alterations of buildings, demolition, or new construction at individually designated landmarks or within historic districts are further subject to the permit requirements of the Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act of 1978 (D.C. Law 2-144). Upon request, advice will be given on the subject of lot subdivisions.
Footnotes -
2101.2
[2] Provisions of the Shipstead-Luce Act (§ 2101.1 (b)) do not include full demolition, though partial demolition is viewed as an alteration.
§ 156.957 Review by Administrator. ( a ) The Administrator of CMS (which for purposes of this section may include his or her delegate), at his or her discretion, may review in whole or in part any initial agency decision issued under § 156.953.
( b ) The Administrator may decide to review an initial agency decision if it appears from a preliminary review of the decision (or from a preliminary review of the record on which the initial agency decision was based, if available at the time) that: ( 1 ) The ALJ made an erroneous interpretation of law or regulation.
( 2 ) The initial agency decision is not supported by substantial evidence.
( 3 ) The ALJ has incorrectly assumed or denied jurisdiction or extended his or her authority to a degree not provided for by statute or regulation.
( 4 ) The ALJ decision requires clarification, amplification, or an alternative legal basis for the decision.
( 5 ) The ALJ decision otherwise requires modification, reversal, or remand.
( c ) Within 30 days of the date of the initial agency decision, the Administrator will mail a notice advising the respondent of any intent to review the decision in whole or in part.
( d ) Within 30 days of receipt of a notice that the Administrator intends to review an initial agency decision, the respondent may submit, in writing, to the Administrator any arguments in support of, or exceptions to, the initial agency decision.
( e ) This submission of the information indicated in paragraph (d) of this section must be limited to issues the Administrator has identified in his or her notice of intent to review, if the Administrator has given notice of an intent to review the initial agency decision only in part. A copy of this submission must be sent to the other party.
( f ) After receipt of any submissions made pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section and any additional submissions for which the Administrator may provide, the Administrator will affirm, reverse, modify, or remand the initial agency decision. The Administrator will mail a copy of his or her decision to the respondent.
( g ) The Administrator's decision will be based on the record on which the initial agency decision was based (as forwarded by the ALJ to the Administrator) and any materials submitted pursuant to paragraphs (b), (d), and (f) of this section.
( h ) The Administrator's decision may rely on decisions of any courts and other applicable law, whether or not cited in the initial agency decision.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 10, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00094

- CV

IN RE THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On February 16 , 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The respondent and real part y in interest filed responses. W e CONDITIONALLY GRANT the Department’s petition

for writ of mandamus as to paragraph 2.1 and DENY the petition as to all other paragraphs. See

T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8.

We ORDER the Honora ble Mary Lou Alvarez to, no later than fifteen days from the date of this order, vacate those portions of her January 28 , 2022 “ Order Following Hearing Regarding Placement [for J.E.] ” ordering the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services to “ offe r a child specific contract with a $1,000 per day offer to Trulight, Pathways, Bair Foundation, and Arrow at a minimum to locate placement for [J.E.]. ” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8. The writ will issue only in the event we are informed Judge Mary Lou Alvarez fails to comply with this order.

This court’s February 1 6 , 2022 stay of the January 28 , 2022 “ Order Following Hearing Regarding Placement [for J.E.] ” is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on August 10, 2022

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of August, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- PA

- 02332 , styled In the Interest of J.E., a C hild , pending in the 285th

Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presiding.
§ 2554.27 Are witness lists exchanged before the hearing? ( a ) At least 15 days before the hearing or at such other time as ordered by the ALJ, the parties must exchange witness lists and copies of proposed hearing exhibits, including copies of any written statements or transcripts of deposition testimony that the party intends to offer in lieu of live testimony.
( b ) If a party objects, the ALJ will not admit into evidence the testimony of any witness whose name does not appear on the witness list or any exhibit not provided to an opposing party unless the ALJ finds good cause for the omission or concludes that there is no prejudice to the objecting party.
( c ) Unless a party objects within the time set by the ALJ, documents exchanged in accordance with this section are deemed to be authentic for the purpose of admissibility at the hearing.
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

May 14, 2018

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit

333 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Re: Laura Holmes, et al.

v. Federal Election Commission

No. 17-1297

(Your No. 16-5194)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

USCA Case #16-5194 Document #1731324 Filed: 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 1
July 18, 2013

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independen ce Ave, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Paul G. Applewhite

Applewhite Aero

PO Box 46955

Seattle, WA 98146

Subject: Waiver Request from FAR 91.203 (a) (b) for an Unmanned Aircraft

Dear Sir,

Applewhite Aero is r equesting a waiver from FAR 91.203 (a) and (b) for the following

unmanned aircraft:

Invenio, Serial Number 20121, N486LQ

Invenio, Serial Number 20122, N486AP

Invenio, Serial Number 20123, N63AP

Due to the aircraft size and weight, it is not feasible to car ry the airworthiness certificate

in the aircraft and no cab i n or cockpit entrance exist s to display the document

. Applewh ite Aero is requesting a waiver from this requirement.

Respectfully Submitted,

Paul G. Applewhite

President

206

- 762

- 5285
§ 2105.27 When will the Agency not notify a submitter of a request for their possibly confidential information? The notice requirements of § 2105.26 will not apply if: ( a ) The information has been lawfully published or officially made available to the public; or
( b ) Disclosure of the information is required by a statute other than the FOIA or by a regulation (other than this part) issued in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 12600.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135372 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135372 COA: 278367 Wayne CC: 01-009370-01 ROBERT T. HINDS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 4.1

<TABLE>

<S>                                                         <C>



                                             INVESTORS
    NUMBER                                    CAPITAL                        SHARES
   IC
                                   INVESTORS CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LTD.

                                                                        CUSIP 46147M 10 8
                                                                        SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


                 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS


       THIS CERTIFIES THAT






       IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF

           FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF

                                INVESTORS CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LTD.

       transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned
by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

          WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers:


        Dated:

                                                     [SEAL]


        /s/ Timothy B. Murphy                                           /s/ Theodore E. Charles

        TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                           PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



COUNTERSIGNED:

COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, INC.
P.O. Box 1596, Denver, Colorado 80201



BY: _____________________________________
    Transfer Agent - Authorized Signature

</TABLE>
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

August 13r 2013 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director - Audit Division 

FROM: Lisa J. Stevenson ^9-

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

For Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Margaret J. Forman " )W<^^ 

Attorney ^ 

SUBJECT; Proposed Draft Final Audit Report on North Dakota Republican Party (LRA 883) 

The Office of the Genera] Counsel has reviewed the proposed Draft Final Audit Report 

("DFAR") for the North Dakota Republican Party ("Committee"). The DFAR contains two 

findings: Misstatement of Financial Activity (Finding 1), and Reporting of Debts and Obligations 

(Finding 2). We concur with the fmdings. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret J. 

Forman, the attorney assigned to the audit.