alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9930]



[[Page 78468]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 2006, a pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the national Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Interchangeable Virtual 
instruments foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, California Instruments, San Diego, CA; and 
Data Translation, Inc., Marlboro, MA have been added as parties to this 
venture. Also, Racial Instruments has changed its name to EADS-NA 
Defense Test and Services, Inc., Irving, CA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments 
Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, 
Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 
Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 
39336).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 30, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 17, 2006 (71 FR 19751).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9930 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

ANH CAO, also known as JOSEPH CAO, CIVIL ACTION

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE

AND REPUBLICAN PARTY OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS NUMBER: 08-4887

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION SECTION: "C" 5

J U D G M E N T

In accordance with the judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth

Circuit, issued as mandate on November 2, 2010,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that §441a(a)(2)(A)’s $5,000

contribution limit is constitutional even though it imposes the same limits on parties as on PACs

and is not adjusted for inflation. Further, §§ 441a(a)(2)-(3), 441a(a)(2)(A), and 441a(a)(7)(B)(i)

are not unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted

in favor of the defendant on those claims. 

Considering the Court having previously granted the defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment as to all other claims; accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiffs’ claims are

hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 10th day of November 2010.

 

HELEN G. BERRIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-04887-HGB-ALC Document 106 Filed 11/10/10 Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )
) A17-01
Proposed Final Audit Report on Tony )
Cardenas for Congress )
CERTIFICATION

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election
Commission, do hereby certify that on March 11, 2019, the Commission
decided by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Tony
Cardenas for Congress, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief
Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated March 5, 2019.

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted
affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:

[Vevch, 2014 DoD CO Big <>

Date Dayna C. Brown
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          40,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       582
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,404
<PP&E>                                         338,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,191)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 753,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          596,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   753,610
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,077)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,139)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,501)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,340)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                     National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, SBIR Topic 230 (Phases I and II).                

*Date:*                     February 27, 2007.                

*Time:*                     12 pm to 4 pm.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate contract proposals.                

*Place:*                     National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., Conference Room D, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                

*Contact Person:*                     Kenneth L Bielat, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Division Of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 7147, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301)496-7576,                     *bielatk@nih.gov*.                

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9886 Filed 12-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
U.S
.Department of Transporrorioo Federal Aviation Administration 

## DEC · 9 2016 Ms. Lisa Ellman Mr. Matthew 

### J. Clark Counsel for Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street NW Washington, DC 20004 Dear Ms. Ellman and Mr. Clark: 800 Independence Ave
.. S.W
. Washington
. D
.C
. 2059 1

Thank you for your December 2 , 2016 letter on behalfofCable News Network, Inc. (CNN) (hereinafter petitioner or operator) requesting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to rescind the amendment dated November 14, 2016. Your request for rescission is hereby granted, effective the date ofthis letter, and you may operate in accordance with the Conditions and Limitations ofExemption No. 121748, issued on December 3, 2015. Your request to extend Exemption No. 121748 for a period oftwo years past the current expiration ofJuly 31 , 2017 is under review at this time
. Once the FAA completes its review , we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner. Sincerely,

John S. Duncan Directqr, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure Exemption No. 121748
§ 2520.20 What service activities may I support with my grant? ( a ) Your grant must initiate, improve, or expand the ability of an organization and community to provide services to address local unmet environmental, educational, public safety (including disaster preparedness and response), or other human needs.
( b ) You may use your grant to support AmeriCorps members: ( 1 ) Performing direct service activities that meet local needs.
( 2 ) Performing capacity-building activities that improve the organizational and financial capability of nonprofit organizations and communities to meet local needs by achieving greater organizational efficiency and effectiveness, greater impact and quality of impact, stronger likelihood of successful replicability, or expanded scale.
[70 FR 39596, July 8, 2005]
#### § 287.135 Are bonuses, rewards and stipends allowed for participants in the NEW Program?

Bonuses, stipends, and performance awards are allowed. However, such allowances may be counted as income in determining eligibility for some TANF or other need-based programs.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/11 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### § 1626.9 Change in circumstances.

If, to the knowledge of the recipient, a client who was an eligible alien becomes ineligible through a change in circumstances, continued representation is prohibited by this part and a recipient must discontinue representation consistent with applicable rules of professional responsibility.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1371

KUNA NDIKUM, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-272-173) Submitted: October 17, 2005 Decided: November 1, 2005 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin K. Fogam, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Joel E. Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kuna Ndikum, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Ndikum fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Ndikum cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–882

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

SEPTEMBER 21, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 586]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 586, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to a special rule reported on the legislative day of September 25, 2000, providing for

consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4578) making appropriations for the Department of the

Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2001, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.

Æ
§ 410.1108 Placement and services for children of unaccompanied children. ( a ) *Placement.* ORR shall accept referrals for placement of parenting unaccompanied children who arrive with children of their own to the same extent that it receives referrals of other unaccompanied children and shall prioritize placing and keeping the parent and child together in the interest of family unity.
( b ) *Services.* ( 1 ) ORR shall provide the same care and services to the children of unaccompanied children as it provides to unaccompanied children, as appropriate, regardless of the children's immigration or citizenship status.
( 2 ) U.S. citizen children of unaccompanied children are eligible for public benefits and services to the same extent as other U.S. citizens. Application(s) for public benefits and services shall be submitted on behalf of the U.S. citizen children of unaccompanied children by care provider facilities. Utilization of those benefits and services shall be exhausted to the greatest extent practicable before ORR-funded services are utilized.
§ 2556.105 Which entities are prohibited from being VISTA sponsors? ( a ) An entity is prohibited from being a VISTA sponsor or from otherwise receiving VISTA assistance if a principal purpose or activity of the entity includes any of the following: ( 1 ) *Electoral activities.* Any activity designed to influence the outcome of elections to any public office, such as actively campaigning for or against, or supporting, candidates for public office; raising, soliciting, or collecting funds for candidates for public office; or preparing, distributing, providing funds for campaign literature for candidates, including leaflets, pamphlets, and material designed for print or electronic media.
( 2 ) *Voter registration activities.* Any voter registration activity, such as providing transportation of individuals to voter registration sites; providing assistance to individuals in the process of registering to vote, including determinations of eligibility; or disseminating official voter registration material.
( 3 ) *Transportation to the polls.* Providing voters or prospective voters with transportation to the polls or raising, soliciting, or collecting funds for such activities.
( b ) Any organization that, subsequent to the receipt of VISTA assistance, makes as one of its principal purposes or activities any of the activities described in paragraph (a) of this section is subject to the procedures in §§ 2556.125 through 2556.145.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-138554 and No. 333-143343) and
Form S-3 (No. 333-152078) of OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd. of our report dated February 26, 2010 relating to the financial statements, financial
statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 26, 2010

---



QuickLinks
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 64 FR 6247, Feb. 9, 1999.

#### § 302.30 Publicizing the availability of support enforcement services.

Effective October 1, 1985, the State plan shall provide that the State will publicize regularly and frequently the availability of support enforcement services under the plan through public service announcements. Publicity must include information on any application fees which may be imposed for such services and a telephone number or postal address where further information may be obtained.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0385)

[50 FR 19647, May 9, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 37731, Oct. 24, 1986]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Indiana Democratic 

Congressional Victory Committee 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk ofthe Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on Febmary 07,2011, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to ^>prove the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee, as 

recommended in the Memorandum fiom the Chief Compliance OfiScer and the 

Audit Division dated January 20,2011. 

Comnussioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn n, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Comniission
January 30,2012 

\led^^< l^^-(^"^<^^ 

CITY OF INTERNATIONAL FALLS 

600 FOURTH STREET 

INTERNATIONAL FALLS, MN 56649 

Telephone 218/283-9484 

FAX 218/283-3590 

OFFICE OF MAYOR 

Shawn Mason 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis - U.S. DOT 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr DeVany: 

I 

on 

CD 

rn-Hrri 

O ^ -

C.J'-

As you know, the federal Essential Air Service program is critical to the economic survival of hundreds of smallto-medium sized U.S. communities. This includes the City of International Falls. Without the federal Essential 

Air Service program, International Falls would not have commercial air service. The current economy and the 

intense competitive climate among air carriers makes it difHcuIt or impossible for those carriers to serve small to 

mid-sized regional airports like ours and still be profitable to the degree they believe they require. That is the 

fairly simple reality of things, but the potential fallout is enormous. 

Without commercial air service, our community and our region would suffer significant economic decline. Our 

summer tourism industry is the main support of our many small resorts and other businesses that work with them. 

They depend on the airport to bring in their customers. Our Cold Weather Test industry relies on commercial air 

service to move goods and people in and out of the airport-based test center. We benefit from the trade of our 

Canadian neighbors who cross the border to do business and who provide nearly half of our annual 

enplanements. Because of the extreme distances to other commercial airports, it is not practical or realistic to 

assume our local business climate could continue as is, let alone improve, if our own commercial service is 

discontinued. 

Koochiching County and International Falls are requesting a meeting with you to discuss our concerns. We know 

we need national consensus about EAS. We have good support for our airport among our congressional 

delegation which includes representatives of both parties and believe that understanding our particularized 

circumstances will help inform this national debate. Our community delegation will be in Washington, D.C. on 

March 5-7 of this year and hope you can make yourself available for a one-half hour conversation in your office 

on March 6. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. 

cc. Senator Amy Klobuchar 

Senator Al Franken 

Representative Chip Cravaack
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY D. OLIPHANT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 414 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.