alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
          I, J. Scott Blouin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conexant Systems,Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Conexant Systems, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Quarterly Report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this Quarterly Report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Reportis being prepared;  b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this QuarterlyReport based on such evaluation; and  c.  disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 8, 2005
/s/ J. Scott Blouin
#### § 411.67 Protection against retaliation.

Care provider facility staff, contractors, volunteers, and UCs must not retaliate against any person who reports, complains about, or participates in an investigation of alleged sexual abuse or sexual harassment. For the remainder of the UC's stay in ORR custody following a report of sexual abuse or sexual harassment, ORR and the care provider facility must monitor to see if there are facts that may suggest possible retaliation by UCs or care provider facility staff and must promptly remedy any such retaliation. ORR and the care provider facility must also monitor to see if there are facts that may suggest possible retaliation by UCs or care provider facility staff against any staff member, contractor, or volunteer and must promptly remedy any such retaliation. Items ORR and the care provider facility should monitor include but are not limited to any UC disciplinary reports, housing or program changes, negative performance reviews, or reassignments of staff. Care provider facilities must discuss any changes with the appropriate UC or staff member as part of their efforts to determine if retaliation is taking place and, when confirmed, immediately takes steps to protect the UC or staff member.
§ 1630.14 Other remedies; effect on other parts. ( a ) In cases of serious financial mismanagement, fraud, or defalcation of funds, LSC shall refer the matter to the Office of Inspector General and may take appropriate action pursuant to parts 1606, 1623, and 1640 of this chapter.
( b ) The recovery of a disallowed cost according to the procedures of this part does not constitute a permanent reduction in a recipient's annualized funding level, nor does it constitute a limited reduction of funding or termination of financial assistance under part 1606, or a suspension of funding under part 1623 of this chapter.
§ 201.10 Review of State and local administration. ( a ) In order to provide a basis for determining that State agencies are adhering to Federal requirements and to the substantive legal and administrative provisions of their approved plans, the Administration conducts a review of State and local public assistance administration. This review includes analysis of procedures and policies of State and local agencies and examination of case records of individual recipients.
( b ) Each State agency is required to carry out a continuing quality control program primarily covering determination of eligibility in statistically selected samples of individual cases. The Service conducts a continuing observation of these State systems.
( c ) Adherence to other Federal requirements set forth in the pertinent titles of the Act and the regulations in this title is evaluated through review of selected case records and aspects of agency operations.
[35 FR 12180, July 29, 1970, as amended at 53 FR 36579, Sept. 21, 1988]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Flex Fuels Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Thomas Barr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





/s/
Thomas Barr





Name:
Thomas Barr


Title: Chief
Executive Officer


Date: April
15, 2009
§ 2525.70 What are the effects of an erroneous certification of successful completion of a term of service? ( a ) If AmeriCorps determines that the certification made by a national service program under § 2525.10(a)(2) is erroneous, AmeriCorps shall assess against the national service program a charge for the amount of any associated payment or potential payment from the National Service Trust, taking into consideration the full facts and circumstances that led to the erroneous or incorrect certification.
( b ) If AmeriCorps determines that the certification made is knowingly false or inaccurate, AmeriCorps will disallow the education award and/or initiate a debt collection process for any education award funds disbursed.
( c ) Nothing in this section prohibits AmeriCorps from taking any action authorized by law based upon any certification that is knowingly made in a false, materially misleading, or fraudulent manner.
§ 30.14 Contracting with private collection contractors and with entities that locate and recover unclaimed assets. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary may contract with private collection contractors to recover delinquent debts, provided that: ( 1 ) The Secretary retains the authority to resolve disputes, compromise debts, suspend or terminate collection action, and refer debts to Justice for litigation;
( 2 ) The private collection contractor is not allowed to offer the debtor, as an incentive for payment, the opportunity to pay the debt less the private collection contractor's fee unless the Secretary has granted such authority prior to the offer;
( 3 ) The contract provides that the private collection contractor is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 to the extent specified in 5 U.S.C. 552a(m), and to applicable Federal and State laws and regulations pertaining to debt collection practices, including but not limited to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692; and
( 4 ) The private collection contractor is required to account for all amounts collected.
( b ) The Secretary shall use government-wide debt collection contracts to obtain debt collection services provided by private collection contractors. However, the Secretary may refer debts to private collection contractors pursuant to a contract between the Department and the private collection contractor only if such debts are not subject to the requirement to transfer debts to the Department of the Treasury for debt collection under 31 U.S.C. 3711(g) and 31 CFR 285.12(e).
( c ) Debts arising under the Social Security Act (which can be collected by private collection contractors only by Treasury after the debt has been referred to Treasury for collection) are excluded from this section.
( d ) The Secretary may fund private collection contractor contracts in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(d), or as otherwise permitted by law. A contract under paragraph (a) of this section may provide that the fee a private collection contractor charges the Department for collecting the debt is payable from the amounts collected.
( e ) The Department may enter into contracts for locating and recovering assets of the United States including unclaimed assets. However, before entering into a contract to recover assets of the United States that may be held by a State government or financial institution, the Department must establish procedures that are acceptable to the Secretary of Treasury.
( f ) The Secretary may enter into contracts for debtor asset and income search reports. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(d), such contracts may provide that the fee a contractor charges the Department for such services may be payable from the amounts recovered, unless otherwise prohibited by statute.
§ 31.7 Review of a determination that a debt is past-due and legally enforceable. ( a ) *Requesting a review.* ( 1 ) If the debtor believes that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable, the debtor may request a review by the Department by sending a written request to the address provided in the notice. The written request must be received by the Department within 60 days from the date of the notice or, if the debtor has requested to inspect the records, within 30 days from the debtor's inspection of the records or the Department's mailing of the records under section 31.6(b), whichever is later.
( 2 ) The request for review must be signed by the debtor, state the amount disputed, and fully identify and explain the evidence that the debtor believes supports the debtor's position. The debtor must submit with the request any documents that the debtor wishes to be considered, or the debtor must state in the request that additional information will be submitted within the above specified time period.
( 3 ) Failure to timely request a review will be deemed an admission by the debtor that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable, and will result in a referral of the debt to the Department of the Treasury without further action.
( b ) *Review.* Upon the timely submission of evidence by the debtor, the Department shall review the dispute and shall consider its records and any documentation and evidence submitted by the debtor. The Department shall make a determination based on the review of the written record, and shall send a written notice of its decision to the debtor. There is no administrative appeal of this decision.
( c ) A debt that previously has been reviewed pursuant to this part, or that has been reduced to a judgment, will not be reconsidered under this part unless the evidence presented by the debtor disputes payments made or events occurring subsequent to the previous review or judgment.
§ 400.28 Maintenance of records and reports. ( a ) A State must provide for the maintenance of such operational records as are necessary for Federal monitoring of the State's refugee resettlement program in accordance with 45 CFR 75.361 through 75.370. This recordkeeping must include: ( 1 ) Documentation of services and assistance provided, including identification of individuals receiving those services;
( 2 ) Records on the location, progress, and status of unaccompanied minor refugee children, including the last known address of parents; and
( 3 ) Documentation that necessary medical followup services and monitoring have been provided.
( b ) A State must submit statistical or programmatic information that the Director determines to be required to fulfill his or her responsibility under the Act on refugees who receive assistance and services which are provided, or the costs of which are reimbursed, under the Act.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0960-0418) [51 FR 3914, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 05, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 05, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0232. PATRICK ATWATER, JR. v. KELLY H. TUCKER.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

North Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee, Kamiah, ID, USDA, Forest Service.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Nez Perce and Clearwater National Forests' North Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will meet Friday, February 24th, 2006, in Lewiston, Idaho for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on February 24th, 2006, will be held at the Idaho State Fish and Game Office, 3316 16th Street, Lewiston, Idaho, beginning at 10 a.m. (PST). Agenda topics will include discussion of potential projects. A public forum will begin at 2:30 p.m. (PST). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ihor Mereszczak, Staff Officer and Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 935-2513.

Dated: January 25, 2006.

Ihor Mereszczak,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 06-976 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 2522.540 Do the costs of performance measurement or evaluation count towards the statutory cap on administrative costs?

No, the costs of performance measurement and evaluation do not count towards the statutory five percent cap on administrative costs in the grant, as provided in § 2540.110 of this chapter.

[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

══════════



### No. 1 7

- 0514

══════════ 

### R ODERIC 

### H ORTON 

### , P ETITIONER 

### ,

v . 

### T EXAS 

### D EPARTMENT OF 

### F AMILY AND 

### P ROTECTIVE 

### S ERVICES 

### , R ESPONDENT

══════════════════ ════════════════════════ O N P ETITION FOR R EVIEW FROM THE C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE T HIR TEENTH D ISTRICT OF T EXAS

══════════════════ ════════════════════════

PER CURIAM
We recently held that, under the Administrative Procedures Act, a party seeking judicial review of an administrative order must first move for rehearing before the administrative law judge, unless another governing statute provides otherwise. Mosley v. Tex. Health & Hum. Servs.
Comm’n , ___ S.W.3d ___, ___ (Tex. 2019). An agency’s affirmative misrepresentation of the proper procedure for judicial review, however, may violate a party’ s right to due process. Id. at

___. This appeal presents the issues decided in Mosley . The court of appeals concluded in this case that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because Horton did not move for rehearing before the administrative law judge, and it rejected Horton’s due

- process challenge based on the agency’s misrepresentation of the proper procedure for judicial review. ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 2017). We agree that the trial court lacked jurisdictio n because Horton did not seek2 rehearing of the order he challenges before the administrative law judge. But because, as in
Mos le y , the agency misrepresented the proper procedure for judicial review in a letter to Horton, we hold that Horton was denied due process. For the reasons expressed in Mosley , we grant Horton’s petition for review and , without oral argument, reverse in part. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 59.1. We hold that the government violated
Horton’s due

- course - of

- law rights under the Texas Constitution. See T EX
. C ONST
. art. I, § 19. 1 Because “the remedy for a denial of due process is due process,” Univ. of Tex. Med. Sch. v. Than , 901 S.W.2d 926, 933 (Tex. 1995), we direct the Department of Family and Protective Services, or its designee, see T EX
. H UM
. R ES
. C O DE § 48.405(a), to reinstate Horton’s administrative case and afford him an opportunity to seek rehearing of the order he challenges before t he administrative law judge.

OPINION DELIVERED: October 25, 2019

1 “While the Texas Constitution is textually different in that it refers to ‘due course’ rather than ‘due process,’ we regard these terms as without meaningful distinction” and thus “have traditionally followed contemporary federal due process interpretations of procedural due process issues .” Univ. of Tex. Med. Sch. v. Than , 901 S.W.2d 926, 929 (Tex. 1995).
§ 1701.4 Fees. ( a ) A fee may be charged for direct costs of document search and duplication at the rate of $0.10 per page for copying and $5.00 per hour for time expended in identifying and locating records.
( b ) A fee may be waived in whole or in part where it is determined that it is in the public interest because furnishing the information can be considered as primarily benefiting the general public or where other circumstances indicate that a waiver is appropriate.
( c ) The Commission may limit the number of copies of any document provided to any person.
[40 FR 7653, Feb. 21, 1975]
§ 400.204 Federal funding for medical assistance. ( a ) To the extent that sufficient funds are appropriated, Federal funding is available for the non-Federal share of medical assistance provided to refugees who are eligible for Medicaid or adult assistance programs during the 36-month period beginning with the first month the refugee entered the United States.
( b ) Federal funding is available for refugee medical assistance (RMA) provided to eligible refugees during a period of time to be determined by the Director in accordance with § 400.211.
( c ) To the extent that sufficient funds are appropriated, Federal funding is available for a State's expenditures for medical assistance under a general assistance (GA) program during the 24-month period beginning with the 13th month after the refugee entered the United States.
[51 FR 3916, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 32225, Aug. 24, 1988; 58 FR 46090, Sept. 1, 1993; 58 FR 64507, Dec. 8, 1993; 60 FR 33604, June 28, 1995]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Neema, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. David Brow, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| March 6, 2009 | /s/ J. David Brow |
|---------------|-------------------|

|   | J. David Brow |
|--------|---------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | Principal Executive Officer and |
|--------|---------------------------------|

|   | Principal Financial and Accounting |
|--------|------------------------------------|

|   | Officer |
|--------|---------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Neema, Inc. and will be retained by Neema, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

38

----
#### § 411.66 Protection of UCs from contact with alleged abusers.

ORR and care provider facility staff, contractors, and volunteers suspected of perpetrating sexual abuse or sexual harassment must be suspended from all duties that would involve or allow access to UCs pending the outcome of an investigation.