alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 793 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to add physical therapists 

to the list of providers allowed to utilize locum tenens arrangements 

under Medicare. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2023 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. GRASSLEY, and 

Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to add 

physical therapists to the list of providers allowed to 

utilize locum tenens arrangements under Medicare. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Interruptions 

5 in Physical Therapy Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 793 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING PHYSICAL THERAPISTS TO UTILIZE 

2 LOCUM TENENS ARRANGEMENTS UNDER 

3 MEDICARE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

5 1842(b)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395u(b)(6)) is amended by striking ‘‘, and (J)’’ and all 

7 that follows through ‘‘physicians’ services furnished by 

8 physicians.’’ and inserting ‘‘, and (J) in the case of out9 patient physical therapy services furnished by physical 

10 therapists, subparagraph (D) of this sentence shall apply 

11 to such services and therapists in the same manner as 

12 such subparagraph applies to physicians’ services fur13 nished by physicians.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 508.2 Request for hearing.

Within 30 days after the Commission's notice of denial of a claim, or approval for a lesser amount than claimed, has been posted by the Commission, the claimant, if a hearing is desired, must notify the Commission in writing, and must set forth in full the reasons for requesting the hearing, including any statement of law or facts upon which the claimant relies.
Due to the use of Java scripting used on the website, http://www.foia.cia.gov/collection/original-wizards-langley, the functionality of the website has not been replicated. All documents linked to on the site have saved in ~\netsite-docs\gpo15391\pdfs.
§ 286.120 Can Tribes make exceptions to the established time limit for families? ( a ) Tribes have the option to exempt families from the established time limits for: ( 1 ) Hardship, as defined by the Tribe, or
( 2 ) The family includes someone who has been battered or has been subject to extreme cruelty.
( b ) If a Tribe elects the hardship option, the Tribe must specify in its TFAP the maximum percent of its average monthly caseload of families on assistance that will be exempt from the established time limit under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) If the Tribe proposes to exempt more than 20 percent of the caseload under paragraph (a) of this section, the Tribe must include a rationale in the plan.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 3 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk July 3 , 2019

158681( 27 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 158681

v COA: 343166

Wayne CC: 04

- 003608

- FC

GREGORY LEE BERRY,

Defendant

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before August 7 , 2019.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTO^ OC. 20461 

Mwrisani 

MKMQRANDUM 

TO: PitrieiaC.Ont)Gk 

Chlof Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hinccrmister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: AdavNoti^ 

Acting Associate Oeneral Counsel 

Policy Division 

LotenzoHoUovw^ •fi'' 

Assistant Oeneral Counsel 

Comidiance Advice 

Joshua Blume 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Rqaxt on Brenda Lawienoe for Conpcss (LRA1019) 

The Office of the GenemI Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report C'DFAR'*) 

on the Brenda Lawrence fior Congress committee Cthe Conunittee"). We concur with the finding 

inthcDFAR: Misstatemem of Financial Activity. Ifyou have any questions, please contact 

Joshua Blume. the attomay assigned to this audit
Palmer v. Tappan, No. S0219-12 CnC (Tomasi, J., Apr. 17, 2012) 

[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the 

accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] 

STATE OF VERMONT 

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION 

Chittenden Unit Docket No. S0219-12 CnC 

) 

Warren Palmer, ) 

) 

 Defendant/Appellant, ) 

 v. ) 

) 

Joshua Tappan, ) 

) 

 Plaintiff/Appellee. ) 

RULING ON APPEAL 

 In August 2011, Plaintiff Joshua Tappan sued defendant “Warren 

Palmer dba Saxon Oaks Corp” in Small Claims Court alleging problems with 

the foundation for a porch that Mr. Palmer built for Mr. Tappan, and seeking 

$5,000 in damages. Mr. Palmer filed an answer disputing the claim and 

requesting a hearing. Two days before the scheduled February 3, 2012 

hearing date, Mr. Palmer filed a motion to reschedule, citing a work-related 

conflict. The court denied the motion as too late to request a continuance. 

Only Mr. Tappan appeared at the hearing, and the Small Claims Court 

entered judgment for Mr. Tappan and against Mr. Palmer, without taking 

evidence, based on Mr. Palmer’s failure to appear. On February 27, 2012, 

Mr. Palmer filed a notice of appeal alleging that Mr. Tappan should have 

sued Saxon Oakes Co. rather than Mr. Palmer individually. 
2 

 Mr. Palmer is essentially seeking to reopen a default judgment against 

him. That motion is properly addressed to the Small Claims Court, pursuant 

to V.R.S.C.P. 3(g). See Moore v. Beecher, 145 Vt. 659, 659 (1984) (mem.) 

(motions under V.R.C.P. 55(c) to set aside a default judgment—the analogue 

of V.R.S.C.P. 3(g)—“are properly addressed only to the trial court”); 

Reporter’s Notes—1992 Amendment, V.R.C.P. 55 (noting that “any defendant 

under [V.R.C.P. 55(c)] would be required” to seek relief from the trial court 

before filing an appeal). 

 Accordingly, the Court dismisses this appeal, remands this matter to 

Small Claims Court, and directs that it consider the Defendant’s notice of 

appeal as a timely motion to reopen the default judgment. It will be up to the 

Small Claims Court in the first instance to decide whether or not Defendant 

has set forth a sufficient justification to reopen the default. This Court 

expresses no view on that matter. 

 So ordered. 

 Dated at Burlington, Vermont this ____day of April, 2012. 

 ------------------------------- 

 Timothy B. Tomasi 

 Superior Court Judge
#### § 2540.600 What definitions apply to this subpart?

*You.* For this subpart, *you* refers to a participant in a national service program.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1638 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1638

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval 
 Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities or locations in Virginia 
     or to house such individuals at such facilities or locations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

    Mr. Forbes (for himself, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Cantor, and Mr. Wittman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval 
 Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities or locations in Virginia 
     or to house such individuals at such facilities or locations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 
              AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FACILITIES OR 
              LOCATIONS IN VIRGINIA.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to any 
Federal department or agency may be used to transfer any individual 
detained by the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 
to any facility or location in Virginia or to house any such individual 
at such a facility or location.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-07: OTS Nos. 17968, H4021, H4099, and H4345]


Westfield Bank, Westfield Mutual Holding Company, Westfield 
Financial, Inc., and New Westfield Financial, Inc., Westfield, MS; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on November 8, 2006, the Assistant 
Managing Director, Examinations and Supervision--Operations, Office of 
Thrift Supervision (OTS), or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated 
authority, approved the application of Westfield Mutual Holding Company 
and Westfield Bank, Westfield, Massachusetts, to convert to the stock 
form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d5d786f61646e2344636b624d42595e23597f686c7e236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="09597c6b65606a2740676f6649465d5a275d7b6c687a276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Northeast Regional Office, 
Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 
07311.

    Dated: December 22, 2006.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 06-9915 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Scott Mackenzie To Tesfai Asmamaw <tasmamaw@fec.gov> 

<mackenzie_co@yahoo.com> ^ 

03/30/2011 03:08 PM ^ 

Subject FDF Audit 

Hello Tesfai, 

Freedom's Defense Fund has received the Commissions Draft Audit Report and I wanted to let 

you know that the Committee does not plan to request a hearing with the Commissioners. 

Scott B. Mackenzie 

703-868-1776
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  December 5, 2005                        /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Daniel B. O'Brien
                                               Chief Financial Officer
EX-31 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification.

  Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.
  250 Vesey Street
  4 World Financial Center, 10th Floor
  New York, New York 10080



  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  9062 Old Annapolis Road
  Columbia, MD 21045

  Re: Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-A4

  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series
     2006-A4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for ABS and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
     required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122
     of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
     included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed
     in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
     such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Assurant Inc., as Sub-Contractor, CitiMortgage, Inc., as servicer,
     GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as servicer, LandAmerica Tax and Flood
     Services, as Sub-Contractor, National City Mortgage Co., as servicer, and
     PHH Mortgage Corporation, as servicer.

     Date:    June 11, 2008

     /s/ Diane Courtney
     Signature

     Vice President
     Title
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RAMP SERIES 2006-RS5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
    Name: Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of Network Installation Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the  "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge, that:

The  quarterly  report  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.





/s/  Jeffrey  R.  Hultman
--------------------------------------
Jeffrey  R.  Hultman
Chief  Executive  Officer
Dated:  November  21,  2005







/s/  Michael  V.  Rosenthal
--------------------------------------
Michael  V.  Rosenthal
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
Dated:  November  21,  2005
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Gary Johnson 2012, Inc.- Request for 

Extension of Time 

) 

) LRA# 905 

) 

) 

GERT-IFI-GA'I'ION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on August 12, 2016, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to take the following action as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Acting Associate General Counsel Policy Division 

dated August 8, 2016: 

Grant the Committee's request for an extension oftime to make a 

repayment of $333,441 for a period of 90 calendar days. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

' 

~~ndktt/Jtt J 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Com
§ 2553.103 Who develops the performance measures? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) CNCS may establish performance measures that will apply to RSVP projects, which sponsors will be responsible for meeting.
( b ) An applicant is responsible for choosing its own project specific performance measures.
[83 FR 64658, Dec. 17, 2018]
#### Frank L. Perley, Appellant, *v.*Morning Telegraph Company, Respondent.

*Perley*v. *Morning Telegraph Go.,*131 App. Div. 599, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted October *4,*1909;

decided October 12, 1909.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a final judgment entered June 8, 1909, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint and sustained such demurrer in an action for libel.

The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment was not directly appealable to the Court of Appeals.

*Ernest W. Marloio*and *Thomas*IF. *Ghurehill*for motion.

*FranMin Bien*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
Kevin Broghamer 

<kevin@bioghamerilc.com> To <CCrusslah@fec.gov>. 

05Q3/2014 03:12 PM « <aboniawicz@fec.gov> 

bcc 

Subject RE: copy of Roamar DFAR I

Please respond to 

<Kevin@BroghamerLLC.com> 

Rosa, BRFP has no issues with the attached DFAR. You may proceed. Thank you very 

much, Kevin 

(859) 619-1512 mobiie 

(859) 919-2369 fax 

Kevin.Broghamer skype 
Kevin Broghamer 

<kevln@broghamerllc.com> 

05/30/2014 01:13 PM 

Plaasa respond to 

Kavln@BroghamarLLC.com 

To CCrussiah@fac.gov, 

cc aboniawicz@fec.gov 

bcc 

Subject Re: BRFP DFAR response 

3 History: ^ This massage, has bean repiiad to.: 

Rosa, we will not be requesting a hearing on the DFAR. Thank you 

—(859) 619-1512 moblle(859) 919-2369 ^xKevln.Broghamer skypeSent via BlackBerry 

byATta
Argued and submitted April 24,

reversed and remanded with instructions May 29,1996

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PHILLIP ELTON BEDARD, *Appellant.*

(9402-718CR; CA A88816)

917 P2d 76

Eric M. Cumfer, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton,* Judges.

*

 Haselton, J., *vice*Leeson, J.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate conviction and dismiss accusatory instrument. *State v. Rudder/*Webb, 137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995), *rev allowed*322 Or 489 (1996).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5627]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) through the Subcommittee 
on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping will conduct 
an open meeting at 9:30 a.m. on January 10, 2007. The meeting will be 
held in Room 1420 of Jemal's Riverside Building, 1900 Half Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20593. The purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the 
38th session of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Sub-
Committee on Standards of Training and Watchkeeping (STW 38) to be held 
on January 22-26, 2007, at the Royal Horticultural Halls and Conference 
Centre in London, England.
    The primary matters to be considered include:
--Comprehensive review of the STCW Convention and the STCW Code;
--Measures to enhance maritime security;
--Unlawful practices associated with certificates of competency;
--Large passenger ship safety;
--Review of the principles for establishing the safe manning levels of 
ships;
--Education and training requirements for fatigue prevention, 
mitigation, and management;
--Training requirements for the control and management of ship's 
ballast water and sediments; and
--Development of competences for ratings.
    Please note that hard copies of documents associated with STW 38 
will not be available at this meeting, the documents will be available 
at the meeting in portable document format (.pdf) on CD-ROM. To request 
documents before the meeting please write to the address provided 
below, and include your name, address, phone number, and electronic 
mail address. Copies of the papers will be sent via electronic mail to 
the address provided.
    Members of the public may attend the meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Luke Harden, U.S. Coast Guard (G-PSO-1), Room 1210, 2100 
Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling; (202) 372-
1408.

    Dated: December 18, 2006.
Michael Tousley,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 06-9894 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re State Farm Lloyds

No. 06

- 19

- 00044

- CV Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JUNE 12, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk