alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1171.1 About the National Endowment for the Humanities.

The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) was established by the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 951 *et seq.,* and is an independent grant-making agency of the United States government dedicated to supporting research, education, preservation, and public programs in the humanities. The NEH is directed by a Chairman and has an advisory council composed of twenty-six presidentially-appointed and Senate-confirmed members.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 61 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to ‘‘National Performance Management Measures; Assessing 

Performance of the National Highway System, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Measure’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BUDD, Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. COTTON, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, 

Mr. MULLIN, Ms. ERNST, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. LEE, Mr. TILLIS, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. HAGERTY, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. RUBIO, 

Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, 

Mr. GRAHAM, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, 

Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. ROMNEY, 

and Mr. HAWLEY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Highway Administration relating to ‘‘National Performance Management Measures; Assessing 

Performance of the National Highway System, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Measure’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 61 IS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Highway Administration relating to ‘‘National Per5 formance Management Measures; Assessing Performance 

6 of the National Highway System, Greenhouse Gas Emis7 sions Measure’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 85364 (December 7, 

8 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 30.19 Review of cost effectiveness of collection.

Periodically, the Secretary will compare costs incurred and amounts collected. Data on costs and corresponding recovery rates for debts of different types and in various dollar ranges will be used to compare the cost effectiveness of alternative collection techniques, establish guidelines with respect to points at which costs of further collection efforts are likely to exceed recoveries, assist in evaluating offers in compromise, and establish minimum debt amounts below which collection efforts need not be taken.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Consent to adoption: currentthrough ...**
 
2010 | 2013 | 2017
2022
 
SuDoc Number:HE 23.1210:C 76/
Item Number:0445-L-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001032667
 
February 23, 2018
§ 1328.3 Core functions. The Centers described in § 1328.2 must engage in the core functions referred to in this section, which shall include: ( a ) Provision of interdisciplinary pre-service preparation and continuing education of students and fellows, which may include the preparation and continuing education of leadership, direct service, clinical, or other personnel to strengthen and increase the capacity of States and communities to achieve the purpose of the DD Act of 2000.
( b ) Provision of community services: ( 1 ) That provide training or technical assistance for individuals with developmental disabilities, their families, professionals, paraprofessionals, policy-makers, students, and other members of the community; and
( 2 ) That may provide services, supports, and assistance for the persons listed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section through demonstration and model activities.
( c ) Conduct of research, which may include basic or applied research, evaluation, and the analysis of public policy in areas that affect or could affect, either positively or negatively, individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.
( d ) Dissemination of information related to activities undertaken to address the purpose of the DD Act of 2000, especially dissemination of information that demonstrates that the network authorized under Subtitle D of the Act is a national and international resource that includes specific substantive areas of expertise that may be accessed and applied in diverse settings and circumstances.
[80 FR 44807, July 27, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 35647, June 3, 2016; 85 FR 72911, Nov. 16, 2020]
§ 2525.50 Is there a limit on the total amount of education awards an individual may receive? ( a ) *General limitation.* While there is no limit on the specific dollar amount, no individual may receive more than the amount equal to the aggregate value of two full-time education awards.
( b ) *Calculation of aggregate value of awards received.* The aggregate value of education awards received is the sum of: ( 1 ) The value of each education award received for successful completion of an approved national service position;
( 2 ) The value of each partial education award received upon release from an approved national service position for compelling personal circumstances; and
( 3 ) The value of any amount received from a transferred education award, except as provided in § 2525.460.
( c ) *Determination of receipt of award.* For purposes of determining the aggregate value of education awards, an award is considered to be received at the time it becomes available for use.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

BEN R. CARRILLO, 

Petitioner, 

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

Respondent. 

__________________________ 

2013-3105 

__________________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DE3330120088-I-1. 

_____________________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________________

O R D E R

Ben R. Carrillo moves for reinstatement of his petition for review. 

The court notes that his petition for review was dismissed on July 31, 2013 for failure to file his brief. The 

court also notes that Mr. Carrillo submitted his opening 

brief on August 13, 2013. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

Case: 13-3105 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 08/21/2013
BEN CARRILLO v. DHS 2

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The mandate is recalled, 

the court’s dismissal order is vacated, and the petition is 

reinstated.

(2) Mr. Carrillo’s opening brief is accepted for filing. 

DHS should calculate the due date for its response brief 

from the date of filing of this order. 

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk

s21

Case: 13-3105 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 08/21/2013
#### § 30.5 Other administrative remedies.

The remedies and sanctions available under this part for collecting debts are not intended to be exclusive. Nothing contained in this part precludes using any other administrative remedy which may be available for collecting debts owed to the Department, such as converting the method of payment under a grant from an advancement to a reimbursement method or revoking a grantee's letter-of-credit.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

DEC 2 9 20H 

MEMORANDUM 

TO; 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Lisa J. Stevenson ^ 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Forman a 

Attorney ^ 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on Amodei for Nevada (LRA #972) 

I. INTRODUCTION 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR") 

on Amodei for Nevada. The DFAR contains one finding: Misstatement of Financial Activity. We 

concur with the finding. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret J. Fonnan, the 

attorney assigned to this audit.
§ 2105.11 What should you know about how the Agency processes requests? ( a ) Except as described in § 2105.12, the Agency is responsible for responding to the request and for making a reasonable effort to search for responsive records.
( b ) In determining which records are responsive to a request, the Agency will include only records in its possession and control on the date that it begins its search.
( c ) The Agency will make reasonable efforts to search for the requested records. As part of its reasonable efforts, the Agency will search paper and/or electronic records (for example, emails), as appropriate. The Agency will not search for records in an electronic form or format if these efforts would significantly interfere with the operation of the Agency's automated information system.
( d ) If the Agency receives a request for records in its possession that it did not create or that another Federal agency is substantially concerned with, it may undertake consultations and/or referrals as described in § 2105.12.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 September 15,2011 

MEMORANDUM 

To: The Commission 

Through: Alec Palmer 

Staff Director 

From: Patricia Carmona 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Acting Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Alex Boniewicz 

Audit Manager 

By: Sheraline Thomas 

Lead Auditor 

Subject: Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the New Hampshire 

Republican State Committee (A09-10) 

Pursuant to Commission Directive No. 70 (FEC Directive on Processing Audit Reports), 

the Audit staffs recommendations are presented below and the findings are discussed in the 

attached Draft Final Audit Report. The Office of General Coimsel has reviewed this 

memorandum and concurs with the recommendations. 

Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity 

The Audit staff recommends tiiat the Commission find that tiie New Hampshire 

Republican State Committee misstated financial activity for calendar years 2007 and 

2008. 

Finding 2. Reporting of Debts and Obligations 

The Audit staff recoirunends that the Commission find that the New Hampshire 

Republican State Committee failed to disclose debt for legal services. 

The Committee did not request an audit hearing. 

If this memorandum is approved, a Proposed Final Audit Report will be prepared within 

30 days of the Commission's vote. 
Should an objection be received. Directive No. 70 states that the Audit Division 

Recommendation Memorandum will be placed on the next regularly scheduled open 

session agenda. 

Documents related to this audit report can be viewed in tiie Voting Ballot Matters folder. 

Should you have any questions, please contact Sheraline Thomas or Alex Boniewicz at 

694-1200. 

Attachment: 

- Draft Final Audit Report on the New Hampshire Republican State Committee 

cc: Office of General Counsel
# To Extend Nondiscriminatory Treatment (Normal Trade Relations Treatment) to the Products of Vietnam

                    1. Vietnam has demonstrated a strong desire to build a friendly and cooperative relationship with the United States and has been found to be in full compliance with the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (the “1974 Act”) (19 U.S.C. 2431*et seq*.).                

2. Pursuant to section 4002 of H.R. 6111, signed on December 20, 2006, I hereby determine that chapter 1 of title IV of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2431-2439) should no longer apply to Vietnam.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including but not limited to section 4002 of Public Law 109-432 do proclaim that:

1. Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be extended to the products of Vietnam, which shall no longer be subject to chapter 1 of title IV of the 1974 Act.

2. The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Vietnam shall be effective as of the date of signature of this proclamation.

3. All provisions of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that are inconsistent with this proclamation are superseded to the extent of such inconsistency.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-00003

Billing code 3195-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6917

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY O. FOSTER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-47)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby O. Foster, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion to be transferred to another prison due to the lack of an

adequate law library. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Foster, No. CR-93-47 (W.D.N.C. June 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KAVIN DATRON WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever III, 

Chief District Judge. (4:10-cr-00088-D-1)

Submitted: April 8, 2016 Decided: April 18, 2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kavin Datron Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson 

Kocher, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kavin Datron Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. In 

denying Williams’ motion, the district court determined that 

Williams received a statutory minimum sentence. See United 

States v. Williams, No. 4:10-cr-00088-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 

2015). We ordered the Government to file a response addressing 

whether (1) the Government opposes Williams’ 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion; and (2) an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) movant 

may obtain relief from the statutory minimum sentence 

established at sentencing where he committed his offense before 

the effective date of the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) but was 

sentenced after the effective date of the FSA and before the 

United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dorsey v. United 

States, 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012). 

In its response, the Government asserts that Williams did 

not receive a statutory minimum sentence and may be eligible for

a sentencing reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The 

Government has filed a motion to vacate the district court’s 

order and remand the case to the district court to allow further 

development of the record. Williams agrees with the motion. 

Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to vacate and 

remand, vacate the district court’s July 9, 2015 order, and 
3

remand for further proceedings. We deny, as moot, Williams’ 

motion to appoint counsel to respond to the Government’s motion 

to vacate and remand. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Exhibit 34.4

Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

We have
examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report
on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of
Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that FDI Collateral
Management (the Company), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Trivin, Inc., complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the title servicing platform as of and
for the year-ended December 31, 2006, except for 1122(d)(1)(ii)-(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii)(D), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(iii)-(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them
with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. See Managements
Assertion for the asset backed transactions covered by this platform. Management is responsible for
the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our
examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that
comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance
with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the
selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions
or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our
opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year-ended December 31,
2006 for the title servicing platform is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

Hartford,
Connecticut
February 26, 2007

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence, Judicial Conference of the United States. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a two day meeting. The meeting will be open to the public observation but not participation. 

# DATES:

April 12-13, 2007. 

*Time:*                         7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

# ADDRESSES:

The Inn at Rancho Santa Fe, 5951 Linea Del Cielo, Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office. 

[FR Doc. 07-1042 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Proceedings  of the ... Space Photovoltaic Research and Technology Conference
SuDocs Number: NAS 1.55:
Item    Number:0830-H-10    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000846012
12th
13th
14th
15th
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  October 12,  2000  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|