alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 618.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 618.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
#### § 2552.113 What financial obligation does CNCS incur for non-CNCS funded projects?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544, Aug. 30, 2024.

Issuance of an NGA to a sponsor of a non-CNCS funded project does not create a financial obligation on the part of CNCS for any costs associated with the project.

[83 FR 64653, Dec. 17, 2018]
§ 2555.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 15, 2007, 12 p.m. to February 15, 2007, 6 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 30, 2007, 72FR4276.                 

The meeting notice is changed to reflect the date change from February 15, 2007 to March 7, 2007. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-1036 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
AND MORRISON COUNTIES STEERING COMMITTEE

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

PREPARED

CASS,

TODD,

INTERIOR

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE

INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 83—4156 PLATE 6

WATER-RESOURCES

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

+ MU QT WO THiS 40 2003 KOITI2N”

EXPLANATION

eau Liz
Shapoin’

ae

55

B.--NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENT 4

Constant-head block

A.--NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENT 3

Constant-flux block

WATER-LEVEL DRAWDOWN--Interval

6 MILES

8 KILOMETERS

bo

rs

2

firearm oe aT

Hint

°

Base from Minnesota Department of Highways

General Highway Maps of Cass, Morrison,

and Todd Counties, 1977

EXPERIMENTS 3 AND 4

PLATE 6.--NUMERICAL—MODEL ANALYSES FOR
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Sign ature: Project No.: 0172.08.005.60 3 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2009 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

Outgoing Date: 01/ 21 /11 Time: 1:00 am

pm

Company Name: Barton Lexa Water Association ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Darren Carruth Contact Phone Number: ( 870) 522

- 1263

General Subject: 2009 DMR Flow Values and Units



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On February 23, 2011 at 1pm I called Barton Lexa Water and explained that I was looking to confirm flow

values and units reported to 2009 DMR. I was told that the manager was not in currently and to call back the

next day.

On February 24, 2011 at 9:24am I called Barton Lexa Water again and was told th at Darren Carruth was the

person to talk to. I was also told that he was out on a call and would get back to me shortly. I gave the

receptionist my contact information.

On February 24, 2011 at 10:50am Darren Carruth returned my call and told me that the person doing the

calculations in 2009 was not performing them accurately. He explained that Outfall 101 is only a 4 inch

diameter pipe and there is no way that flows of 400 MGD could be discharged from that pipe. He also

mentioned that 2010 flows are 0.003

- 0.004 MGD and those values are much more reasonable. Recommend

changing flows to GPD instead of MGD for 2009.
#### § 2104.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                    AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                     APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                           0
<PP&E>                                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      0
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                2434
<OTHER-SE>                                                             18814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                               0
<SALES>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                           0
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        (750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0



</TABLE>
#### §§ 1356.69-1356.70 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77757-77758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9876]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New 
Mexico, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the 
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. 
On November 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7834q(b), the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

Employees of the Department of Energy predecessor agencies and their 
contractors or subcontractors who were monitored or should have been 
monitored for exposure to ionizing radiation associated with 
radioactive lanthanum (RaLa) operations at Technical Area 10 (Bayo 
Canyon Site), Technical Area 35 (Ten Site), and Buildings H, Sigma, 
and U (located within Technical Area 1) at the Alamos National 
Laboratory (LANL) for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 
work days during the period from September 1, 1944 through July 18, 
1963, or in combination with work days within the parameters 
established for one or more other classes of employees in the SEC.

    This designation became effective on December 9, 2006, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7834l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 9, 2006, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Ellicott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also

[[Page 77758]]

be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8e7ebe9fbe8ebeceb86efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8e7ebe9fbe8ebeceb86efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 06-9876 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### James L. Bruff, Appellant, *v.*Anna Dunfee et al., as Executors of John Dunfee, Deceased, Respondents.

*Bruff*v. *Dunfee,*121 App. Div. 894, affirmed.

(Argued January 12, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered September 18,1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover money alleged to have been deposited by the plaintiff with the defendants’ testator.

*Jacob M. Grossman*and *Franh C. Sargent*for appellant.

*John W. Hogan*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscook, JJ.
#### Caleb E. Whitaker, Respondent, *v.*Imperial Skirt Manufacturing Company, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Bbady, *3.*
§ 2525.460 What is the impact of transferring or receiving a transferred education award on an Eligible Individual's eligibility to receive additional education awards? ( a ) *Impact on transferring individual.* Pursuant to § 2525.50, an education award is considered to be received at the time it becomes available for a Designated Recipient's use. Transferring all or part of an award does not reduce the aggregate value of education awards the transferring individual is considered to have received.
( b ) *Impact on Designated Recipient.* For the purposes of determining the value of the transferred education award under § 2525.50, a Designated Recipient will be considered to have received a value equal to the amount received divided by the amount of a full-time education award in the year the transferring Eligible Individual's position for that education award was approved.
( c ) *Result of revocation on education award value.* If the Eligible Individual revokes the transferred education award, in whole or in part, the value of the education award considered to have been received by the Designated Recipient for purposes of § 2525.50 will be reduced accordingly.
§ 5b.13 Fees. ( a ) *Policy.* Where applicable, fees for copying records will be charged in accordance with the schedule set forth in this section. Fees may only be charged where an individual requests that a copy be made of the record to which he is granted access. No fee may be charged for making a search of the system of records whether the search is manual, mechanical, or electronic. Where a copy of the record must be made in order to provide access to the record (*e.g.,* computer printout where no screen reading is available), the copy will be made available to the individual without cost. Where a medical record is made available to a representative designated by the individual or to a physician or health professional designated by a parent or guardian under § 5b.6 of this part, no fee will be charged.
( b ) *Fee schedule.* The fee schedule for the Department is as follows: ( 1 ) Copying of records susceptible to photocopying—$.10 per page.
( 2 ) Copying records not susceptible to photocopying (*e.g.,* punch cards or magnetic tapes)—at actual cost to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
( 3 ) No charge will be made if the total amount of copying does not exceed $25.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 30, 2013



/s/ Din Dayal JalanName: Din Dayal JalanTitle: Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and is not being filed either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
§ 309.85 What records must a Tribe or Tribal organization agree to maintain in a Tribal IV-D plan? A Tribal IV-D plan must provide that: ( a ) The Tribal IV-D agency will maintain records necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the program, including records regarding: ( 1 ) Applications for child support services;
( 2 ) Efforts to locate noncustodial parents;
( 3 ) Actions taken to establish paternity and obtain and enforce support;
( 4 ) Amounts owed, arrearages, amounts and sources of support collections, and the distribution of such collections;
( 5 ) IV-D program expenditures; and
( 6 ) Statistical, fiscal, and other records necessary for reporting and accountability required by the Secretary.
( b ) The Tribal IV-D agency will comply with the retention and access requirements at 45 CFR 75.361 through 75.370, including the requirement that records be retained for at least three years.
[69 FR 16672, Mar. 30, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016; 89 FR 9796, Feb. 12, 2024]
§ 689.6 Investigations. ( a ) When an awardee institution or another Federal agency has promptly initiated its own investigation, OIG may defer an NSF inquiry or investigation until it receives the results of that external investigation. If it does not receive the results within 180 days, OIG may proceed with its own investigation.
( b ) If OIG decides to initiate an NSF investigation, it must give prompt written notice to the individual or institutions to be investigated, unless notice would prejudice the investigation or unless a criminal investigation is underway or under active consideration. If notice is delayed, it must be given as soon as it will no longer prejudice the investigation or contravene requirements of law or Federal law-enforcement policies.
( c ) If a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or another Federal agency is underway or under active consideration by these agencies or the NSF, OIG will determine what information, if any, may be disclosed to the subject of the investigation or to other NSF employees.
( d ) An NSF investigation may include: ( 1 ) Review of award files, reports, and other documents already readily available at NSF or in the public domain;
( 2 ) Review of procedures or methods and inspection of laboratory materials, specimens, and records at awardee institutions;
( 3 ) Interviews with subjects or witnesses;
( 4 ) Review of any documents or other evidence provided by or properly obtainable from parties, witnesses, or other sources;
( 5 ) Cooperation with other Federal agencies; and
( 6 ) Opportunity for the subject of the investigation to be heard.
( e ) OIG may invite outside consultants or experts to participate in an NSF investigation. They should be appointed in a manner that ensures the official nature of their involvement and provides them with legal protections available to federal employees.
( f ) OIG will make every reasonable effort to complete an NSF investigation and to report its recommendations, if any, to the Deputy Director within 180 days after initiating it.
#### Hazlewood v. Heminway, appellant.

*Witness—cross-examination*— *leading questions.*

Leading questions may always be asked of an adversary’s witness on cross-examination. They are generally discretionary, when put to the party’s own witness; and where they are, in fact, objectionable, the objection will be regarded as waived if not made in time and before the answer, so that the objection might have been obviated.

Such an objection should not be entertained or allowed to prevail after the execution and return of a commission, unless, in any view, th'e objection was *788previously made, on the settlement of the interrogatories annexed to the commission.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee in favor of plaintiff. The action was brought by John Hazle wood against George G. Heminway, to recover for work, labor and services under a special contract.

*L. H. Brown,*for appellant.

*E. B. Hawes,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The case depended upon a single question of fact, and the headnote contains all that is material for publication in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 171.100 Statutory basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements section 3022 of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 300jj-52.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to establish exceptions for reasonable and necessary activities that do not constitute information blocking as defined by section 3022(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 300jj-52.