alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1593 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1593

   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of 
   Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the 
                National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

   Mr. Larsen of Washington introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of 
   Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the 
                National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SEGMENTS.

    Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(__) Illabot creek, washington.--The 14.3 mile segment 
        from the headwaters of Illabot Creek to 1,000 feet south of and 
        at no point closer than 200 feet from the Rockport-Cascade 
        Road, flowing through lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service, 
        Washington State Department of Natural Resources, and Seattle 
        City Light, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture 
        as follows:
                    ``(A) The 4.3 mile segment from the headwaters of 
                Illabot Creek to the boundary of Glacier Peak 
                Wilderness Area as a wild river.
                    ``(B) The 10 mile segment from the boundary of 
                Glacier Peak Wilderness to 1,000 feet south of 
                Rockport-Cascade Road as a recreational river.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 400.71 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart and Subpart I—

*Appropriate agency providing employment services* means an agency providing services specified under § 400.154(a) of this part which are specifically designed to assist refugees in becoming employed, which must include an established program of job referral to, and job placement with, private employers, and which must be determined acceptable by the State.

*Employability plan* means an individualized written plan for a refugee registered for employment services that sets forth a program of services intended to result in the earliest possible employment of the refugee.

*Employability services* means services, as specified in § 400.154 of this part, designed to enable an individual to obtain employment and to improve the employability or work skills of the individual.

*Employable* means not exempt from registration for employment services under § 400.76 of this part.

*Employment services* means the services specified in § 400.154(a) of this part.

*Family self-sufficiency plan* means a plan that addresses the employment-related service needs of the employable members in a family for the purpose of enabling the family to become self-supporting through the employment of one or more family members.

*Registrant* means an individual who has registered for employment services under § 400.75 of this part.

[54 FR 5477, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33602, June 28, 1995; 65 FR 15448, Mar. 22, 2000]
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Coleman and Bray Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

MARY ELLEN GUILFOYLE MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0118-96-1 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY JULY 9, 1996 JOSEPH CHARLES GUILFOYLE

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Jerome B. Friedman, Judge J. Russell Fentress, IV (Goss, Meier & Fentress, on brief), for appellant. No brief or argument for appellee.

Acting on remand from this Court, the trial court awarded Mary E. Guilfoyle (wife) spousal support of $2,300 per month from Joseph C. Guilfoyle (husband) and ordered husband to pay $4,000 of wife's attorney's fees. On appeal, wife complains that these awards are inadequate. We disagree and affirm the decision of

the trial court. The parties are fully conversant with the record, and a recitation of the facts is unnecessary to this appeal. Under well established principles, a trial court is vested with broad discretion in awarding both spousal support, see Papuchis v. Papuchis , 2 Va. App. 130, 133, 341 S.E.2d 829, 831 (1986), and attorney's fees, see Graves v. Graves , 4 Va. App. 326, 333, 357 S.E.2d 554, 558 (1987), and we review such decrees only for an

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - abuse of discretion. See Graves , 4 Va. App. at 333, 357 S.E.2d at 558; Papuchis , 2 Va. App. at 133, 341 S.E.2d at 831. Here, we find that the trial court properly considered the appropriate statutory imperatives in fixing the disputed spousal support and did not abuse its discretion in awarding such support or the related attorney's fees. Accordingly, we affirm the

decree.

Affirmed.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB/A AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                 1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          3,221
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          5,881
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                3,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    57,164
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         73,340
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           73,297
<LOANS>                                       189,268
<ALLOWANCE>                                       989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                288,475
<DEPOSITS>                                    220,467
<SHORT-TERM>                                   20,350
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,310
<LONG-TERM>                                    19,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          318
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                288,475
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 9,649
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               3,675
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  481
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               13,805
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              7,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,432
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           4,373
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      65
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   585
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      522
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        60
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  924
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 989
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0445

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DUSTIN WADE SORLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2024

02/28/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0445
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant, 

AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK, INC.,

Intervenor Defendant.

 

Case No. 16-cv-2255 (CRC)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Federal Election Commission’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 

28) is DENIED.

2. Intervenor-Defendant American Action Network’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

(ECF No. 30) is DENIED.

3. Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 31 & 32) is GRANTED.

4. Defendant Federal Election Commission shall conform with the Court’s declaration 

within 30 days, in accordance with 52 U.S.C. § 30109.

SO ORDERED.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: March 20, 2018

Case 1:16-cv-02255-CRC Document 47 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 1
§ 1801.31 Approval of graduate programs by the Foundation. ( a ) By December 1, Scholars desiring Foundation support for graduate study the following academic year must submit a proposed program of graduate study to the Foundation for approval. The graduate program proposed for approval may differ from that proposed by the Scholar when nominated for a Truman Scholarship. Factors to be used by the Foundation in considering approval include being consistent with: ( 1 ) Field of study initially proposed in the Scholar's Application;
( 2 ) Graduate school programs given priority in the current Bulletin of Information;
( 3 ) Undergraduate educational program and work experience of the Scholar; and
( 4 ) Preparation specifically for a career in public service.
( b ) Foundation approval in writing of the Scholar's proposal is required before financial support is granted for graduate work.
( c ) Scholars must include in their submission to the Foundation a statement of interest in a career in public service that specifies in detail how their graduate program and their overall educational and work experience plans will realistically prepare them for their chosen career goal in government or elsewhere in public service.
( d ) After completing his or her undergraduate studies, a Scholar each year may request in writing a deferral of support for graduate studies. Deferrals must be requested no later than June 15 for the succeeding academic year. Scholars failing to request a year's deferral and to receive written approval from the Foundation may lose one year of funding support for each year for which they fail to request and receive deferrals. Total deferrals may not exceed four years unless an extension is granted in writing by the Foundation.
03/02/201 1 08:3 1 FA X 310725681 6 AWP-7 1100 2

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C

I n th e Matte r

o f Donn aDeVaney , FA A Docke t No . CPIOWPJ^O I 1 DM S No. : FA A 2010-078 5 FA A Region : Wester nPacifi c Responden t

Judge : Richar dC

- Good^viD MOTIO NT O WITHDRA WCOMPLAIN T To : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi nan dRespondent ; Th e Regiona l Counse l for th e Western-Pacifi c Region , Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) throug hcounsel , hereb y files thi s Motio nfo r Withdrawa l of

th e Complain t

an dseek s dismissa l o f

thi s action . Thi s motio ni s base do nth e fac t th o partie s hav e settle dthi s matter , therefor e ahearin g i s n o longe r required . Respectfiill y submitted , NAOM I TSUD A Regiona l Counse l By : Ada mRunke l Attorne y Dated : ^,^^

^ Qg 2 0 i 103/02/201 1 08:3 1 FA X 310725681 6 AWP-7 il00 3

CERTIFICATI

- O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s dat e I hav e sen t

b y facsimil e wher e indicate dtm d place di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dmai l - retur nreceip t rtiqueste d Complainant' s Motio n t o Withdra w Complaint , addresse da s follows : ORIGINA LAN D ON ECOP Y

Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 ON ECOP Y Hon . Richar dC . Goodwi n

Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S-E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-23 0 Washingtoti , D.C . 2059 0 Facsimile : (202 ) 366-753 6 Donn aR . DeVane y 212SteepiebrookDr . Sprin g Branch , T X 7807 0 Dated : ^A R0 2 201 1

Jef f Kambefg'^Legal Technici ^ Offic e o f th e Regiona l Couns ^ Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Western-Pacifi c Regio n Lawndale , California
THE COMMONWEALTH OF

MASSACHUSETTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY

& ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

100 CAMBRJDGE STREET

SUITE 900

BOSTON, MA 02114

(617) 626-1000

www..mass.gov/eoeea

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

ONE ASHBURTON PLACE

BOSTON, MA 02108

(617)727-2200

www.mass.gov/ag

December 4, 2009

Mr. Ronald P. Lewis

Appliance Standards

Buildings Technology Program

Department ofEnergy

Washington, D.C. 20585

RE: Massachusetts Petition for Waiver ofFederal Preemption (Furnace Standard)

Dear Mr. Lewis:

As you know, on October 1,2009, the Commonwealth ofMassachusetts sent to

the United States Department ofEnergy's Office ofEnergy Efficiency and Renewable

Energy a petition for waiver offederal preemption that would allow Massachusetts to

implement a 90% AFUE standard for non-weatherized, residential gas-fired furnaces..

On October 29, 2009, Assistant Attorney General Fred Augenstern sent an e-mail to you

regarding the requirement in 10 CFR 430.42(f) that DOE notifY a petitioning state within

15 days ofreceiving the petition whether the petition has been accepted for filing. You

kindly, and quickly, responded on November 6, 2009 that "DOE accepts the

Commonwealth's petition for filing purposes."

We write today to urge DOE to publish notice ofthis petition at its earliest

convenience. Under 10 CFR 430.43(a):

"Promptly after receipt of a petition and its acceptance for filing, notice ofsuch

petition shall be published in the FEDERAL REGISTER."

EERE-2009-BT-PET-0024 DOC-ID 1.2.004
Mr. Ronald P. Lewis

December 4, 2009

Page 2.

The Commonwealth is well aware ofthe large number of appliance dockets

before DOE, and fully appreciates the value ofthose dockets moving forward. However,

we hope that it would not take much ofthe agency's time or resources to arrange for

appropriate publication of notice in the Federal Register. The Commonwealth is eager to

obtain a prompt decision on its petition, preferably within the six month period specified

in 10 CFR 430.46(a). Delaying publication of notice will only serve to increase the

likelihood that DOE does not meet that 6-month deadline. Moreover, even ifthe

Secretary finds that he "cannot issue a final rule within the 6-month period pursuant to

paragraph (a)," 10 CFR 430.46(c), and exercises his discretion to extend the period for

review ofthe petition, it still will shorten the overall duration ofDOE's review if notice

is published right away, as required by 10 CFR 430.43.

AAG Augenstern may be reached at 617-963-2427, or at

fred.augenstern@state.ma.us, should you wish to discuss this matter.

The Commonwealth appreciates your attention and assistance.

Sincerely,

J$tWf1~-R Frederick D. Augenstern j~ Assistant Attorney General

Environmental Protection Division

11 A 1\,1,' "i l /if I

ji i,l 01! / /\

j\ .f ,l~~,~,_.

F"r~9orke/Qirect~r

Divi.tion ofEnergy \Efficiency

Department ofEnergy Resources

EERE-2009-BT-PET-0024 DOC-ID 1.2.004
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 20 1 2

- 0 265 , by one of the following methods:

• www.regulations.gov : Follow the on

- line instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail : Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) ( Mail C ode 28221T ) , 1200 Pennsylvania Ave

. , NW

. , Washington, DC 20460

- 0001

. • H and Delivery: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Building , Room 3334, 1301 Constitutio n Ave. , NW., Washington, DC 20004

. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
The EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov , including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e
- mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you prov ide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e

- mail comment directly to the EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov , your e
mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD

– ROM you sub mit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, avoid any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about the EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA Docket C enter homepage at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

. Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Ms. Jeannine Kausch by telephone at ( 703 ) 347

- 8920 or via email at kausch.jeannine@epa.gov

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Plaintiff

v.

CRAIG FOR U.S. SENTATE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:12-cv-00958 (ABJ)

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given this 24th day of November, 2014, that Defendants Craig for U.S.

Senate and Larry E. Craig (individually, and in his official capacity as Treasurer of Craig for

U.S. Senate) hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Circuit the Order (Docket No. 26) and related Memorandum Opinion (Docket No. 27) of this

Court entered on the 30th day of September, 2014 in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants.

Dated: November 24, 2014 Respectfully submitted

/s/ Andrew D. Herman

Andrew D. Herman (DC Bar No. 462334)

MILLER & CHEVALIER CHARTERED

655 Fifteenth Street, NW, Suite 900

Washington, DC 20016

Telephone: 202-626-5869

Facsimile: 202-626-5801

Email: aherman@milchev.com

Attorney for Defendants

Case 1:12-cv-00958-ABJ Document 28 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 1
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION f 

SECOND SESSION f 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, September 27, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett. Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. By 

1 EX. B.. Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report-Ex. Rept 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Mmage Nominee. Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

* 292 161 Lawrence B. Lmdsey. of Virginia. to be a Aug 29. 91 Mr. Riegle, 

Member of the Board of Governors of the Committee on Banking. 

Federal Reserve System for the unexpired Housing. and Urban Affairs. 

term of fourteen years from February 1. with printed report with 

1986, vice Manuel H. Johnson, resigned. additional views - Ex.Rept 

102-14. 

DEPAR'l'MENT OF STATE 

* 312 572 Arnold Lee Kanter. of Virginia. to be Under Sep 24, 91 Mr. Pell, 

Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Committee on Foreign 

vice Robert Michael Kimmitt. Relations, without printed 

report. 
calendar 

No. 

Message 

No. 

Nommee. Offlce, And Predecessor 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE -- Con. 

* 313 574 · Thomas Michael Tolliver Niles. of the 

District of Columbia. a Career Member 

the Senior Foreign Service, Cius of 

Career Mimster. to be an Assistant 

Secretary of State, vice Raymond G. H. 

Seitz. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to 

constituted committee of the Senate. 

Sep 91 Mr. Pett 

Committee on Foreign 

without printed 
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning William Clark, Jr., and ending Thomas A. Rodgers, which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of September 11, 

1991.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6542

DUNCAN LAMARR BURRESS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY PERKINS, Correctional Officer II; JOSHUA HYPES, 

Correctional Officer; JEREMY ARBOGAST, Correctional Officer; 

CHAD SISK, Correctional Officer; JESSE FOSTER, Correctional 

Officer; CHARLES LEGG, Correctional Officer, Lieutenant 

Shift Commander for Quilliams II; PAUL PARRY, Assistant 

Warden Security; DAVID BALLARD, Warden; GARY HINTE, 

Investigator Intelligence Officer; JOHNATHAN FRAME, 

Institutional Investigator; CURTIS DIXON, Sergeant, 

Institutional Investigator; ROBERT RHODES, Major, Chief 

Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, 

District Judge. (2:13-cv-01970)

Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duncan Lamarr Burress, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly M. Bandy, 

Natalie C. Schaefer, SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, 
2

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Duncan Lamarr Burress appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Burress v. Perkins, No. 2:13-cv-01970 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 

20, 2014; Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED