alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 680.11 Staff involvement with NSF proposals and awards. ( a ) ( 1 ) Many scientists, engineers, and educators interrupt active research and teaching careers to spend a year or two at NSF and then return to research and teaching, usually at the same institution from which they came. Many such visiting scientists, engineers, and educators (and a few permanent employees) who have been principal investigators under NSF awards before coming to NSF, retain some interest or association with the work. If an individual is a principal investigator under an NSF award, the individual is not precluded from retaining ties to the work after becoming an NSF employee. The employee may stay in contact with those who are continuing the work in the employee's laboratory or on his or her project. The employee may continue to supervise graduate students. And the employee may visit and work in the laboratory on his or her own time for these and related purposes.
( 2 ) Before a prospective employee comes to NSF, the prospective employee and the grantee institution must designate, subject to NSF approval, a “substitute principal investigator”—i.e., another scientist who will be responsible for the work and equipment and will represent the institution in any dealings with NSF officials while the prospective employee is at NSF.
( 3 ) Appointment of a substitute principal investigator is unnecessary if all work under an award is to be completely suspended while the employee is at NSF. If the work is to be suspended, the employee and the grantee institution must inform the NSF in writing before the employee's employment begins. Work under the award may be resumed when the employee completes his or her NSF employment, and its term may be extended to account for the time lost during the employee's NSF employment.
( b ) ( 1 ) NSF will entertain no proposal on which a current NSF employee would be a senior investigator or equivalent, unless it is a proposal for continuation or extension of support for work on which the employee served in that capacity before coming to NSF. Any proposal for continuation of NSF support at essentially the same level (with reasonable allowance for inflation) will normally be considered a proposal for continuation or extension if it would support the work of the same investigator and his or her laboratory or group (if any) in the same general field of science, engineering, or education, notwithstanding that the focus of the work may change in response to research opportunities or educational needs.
( 2 ) Someone other than the current NSF employee must submit any such proposal for continuation or extension of work NSF previously supported and handle all negotiations with NSF, but the capacity in which the current NSF employee will serve should be clearly spelled out in the proposal.
( c ) In accordance with 5 CFR 5301.103(a)(1), an NSF employee may not receive, directly or indirectly, any salary, consulting fee, honorarium, or other form of compensation for services, or reimbursement of expenses, from an NSF award.
Exhibit
99.2





CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Patterson
Brooke Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B.
Gordon Brooke, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer.
Secretary Treasurer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.





January
25, 2010





B. GORDON
BROOKE


B.
Gordon Brooke


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director








-1-
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-707.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and PALAU 

Signed at Koror September 13, 2002 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
PALAU 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement signed at Koror September 13, 2002; 

 Entered into force July 7, 2003.
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 12/17 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Ut e Tribe Tribal Consultation held on 12/16/2014 **SUMMARY :**  EPA Region 8 participated in a tribal consultation with the Ut e Tribe of the Uint ah and Ouray Indian Reservation held on 12/16/2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan Supplemental for E xisting Power Plants that was issued on October 2 8 , 2014. **ATTENDEES: Attendees on Behalf of the Ute Tribe**  Chris Reagen Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP Louisville, CO **Ute Tribal Business Committee**  Gordon Howell, Chairperson, Whiteriver Band Rep. Phillip Chimburas, Whiteriver Band Rep. Ronald Wopsock, Vice Chairperson, Uinta h Band Rep. Bruce Ignacio, Uintah Band Rep. Tony Small, Uncompahgre Band Rep. Stewart Pike, Uncompahgre Band Rep. **EPA ATTENDEES Office of Air and Radiation**  William Niebling - Senior Advisor, Office of the Assistant Administrator Pat Childers - Indian Pro gram Manager, OAR Rick Vetter - Office of General Counsel Gregory Green - Division Director, OAQPS Laura McKelvey - Manager, OAQPS Melanie King - CPP Team, OAQPS Mary Johnson - CPP Team OAQPS Toni Colón - Tribal Outreach & Consultation, OAQPS **EPA Region 8** Carl Daly - Director, Air Program Mike Boydston - Regional Counsel Kimberly Varilek - Regional Counsel Alfreda Mitre - Director, Tribal Assistance Program Randy Brown -Tribal Program Manager Laura Farris - Climate Change CoordinatorRobert Ward – Regional Counsel
#### § 205.30 Methods of administration.

State plan requirements: A State plan for financial assistance under title I, IV-A, X, XIV or XVI (AABD) of the Social Security Act must provide for such methods of administration as are found by the Secretary to be necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the plan.

[45 FR 56684, Aug. 25, 1980]
#### § 2519.310 Is a participant eligible to receive an AmeriCorps educational award?

In general, no. However, certain positions in programs funded under this part may qualify as approved AmeriCorps positions. The Corporation will establish eligibility requirements for these positions as a part of the application package.
#### § 60.2 Applicability.

The regulations in this part establish reporting requirements applicable to hospitals, health care entities, Boards of Medical Examiners, and professional societies of health care practitioners which take adverse licensure or professional review actions; state licensing or certification authorities, peer review organizations, and private accreditation entities that take licensure or certification actions or negative actions or findings against health care practitioners, health care entities, providers, or suppliers; entities (including insurance companies) making payments as a result of medical malpractice actions or claims; and Federal government agencies, state law and fraud enforcement agencies and health plans that take final adverse actions against health care practitioners, providers, and suppliers. They also establish procedures to enable individuals or entities to obtain information from the NPDB or to dispute the accuracy of NPDB information.

[78 FR 20484, Apr. 5, 2013, 78 FR 25860, May 6, 2013]
#### Jacob Fisher, *Respondent, v.*Stephen M. Corwin, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied.
Docket No. FAA-2012-0265

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/6/10 ---

Transport Canada Dave Lotterer 5/6/10

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/6/10

ATA M. Lopez 5/6/10
#### § 615.4 Legal proceedings before NSF or in which the United States is a party.

In any legal proceeding before NSF or to which the United States is a party, the General Counsel shall arrange for a current employee to testify as a witness for the United States whenever the attorney representing the United States requests it. The employee may testify for the United States both as to facts within the employee's personal knowledge and as an expert or opinion witness. For any party other than the United States, the employee may testify only as to facts within his or her personal knowledge.
JOSEPH LUIS LEVIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0350

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 3, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

Joseph Luis Levin, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 

 

 November 30, 2023 

Office of the Chief of Protocol 

Diplomatic Gift Unit

U.S. Department of State

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

VIA E-MAIL

To Whom It May Concern: 

Employees of the Federal Election Commission did not give gifts to foreign individuals 

with more than minimal value between October 1, 2022 and September 30, 2023. 

Please contact me at (202) 694-1003 or apike@fec.gov if you need additional 

information. 

Sincerely,

Amy E. Pike 

Deputy Director 

Office of Congressional Affairs
§ 283.9 What do eligible States need to know to access and use the bonus funds? ( a ) States must use the bonus funds to carry out the purposes of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Block Grant in section 401 and 404 of the Act. This may include statewide programs to prevent and reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies.
( b ) As applicable, these funds are subject to the requirements in, and the limitations of, sections 404 and 408 of the Act.
( c ) For Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa, the bonus award funds are not subject to the mandatory ceilings on funding established in section 1108(c)(4) of the Act.
The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District Judge f or the Eastern 1 District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-4072

_____________ Rodney Tyrone Hopkins, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Tannery West, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: June 27, 1997 Filed: July 7, 1997

_____________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Rodney Tyrone Hopkins appeals from the District Court's adverse grant o f 1 summary judgment

to Tannery West, Inc., in his Title VII action. After review of the parties' briefs and the record, we conclude the District Court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10230-10231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEATLH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities Special Emphasis Panel, Loan Repayment

[[Page 10231]]

Program for Health Disparities (L60) and Clinical (L32) Research, 
(Renewals)--Panel A.
    Date: April 8, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Dem 2, 6707 Democracy 
Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Lorrita Watson, PhD, National Center on Minority 
Health and Heath Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892-5465, (301) 402-1366, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#166177626579787a5678757b7e7238787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d7c1d4d3cfcecce0cec3cdc8c48ecec9c88ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1038 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57673-57674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22855]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and 
Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and 
Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
eighth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 226, Audio Systems and 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 8-10, 2012 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th Street NW., 
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bouquet may be contacted

[[Page 57674]]

directly at (202) 330-0663, email: sbousquet@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 226. The agenda will 
include the following:
     Welcome and Administrative Remarks
     Introductions
     Agenda Overview
     Review FRAC comment
     Solicit proposals for further changes to DO-214 per FRAC 
comment
     Incorporate all changes into DO-214 draft
     Final review of DO-214 and draft updates/changes
     Committee to approve final document for release to the PMC
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 10, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-22855 Filed 9-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### § 308.0 Scope.

This part establishes standards and criteria for the State self-assessment review and report process required under section 454(15)(A) of the Act.
July 7 , 2015

M r.Michael Dill

551 Bay St.

Dunedin, FL 34698

Dear Mr. Dill :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26 th 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

-

2476 ), but we are unable to process your request any fur ther. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you mus t send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, th e extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

woul d provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to suppo rt your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (2 02) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 2540.530 Are there instances where an insignia may be used without getting the approval of the Corporation?

All uses of the national service insignia require the written approval of the Corporation.
§ 30.3 Antitrust, fraud, exception in the account of an accountable official, and interagency claims excluded. ( a ) *Claims involving antitrust violations or fraud.* ( 1 ) The standards in this part relating to compromise, suspension, and termination of collection activity do not apply to any debt based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of antitrust laws, or to any debt involving fraud, presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any party having an interest in the claim, unless the Department of Justice returns a referred claim to the Department for further handling in accordance with parts 31 CFR 900 through 904 and this part.
( 2 ) Upon identification of a debt suspected of involving an antitrust violation or fraud, a false claim, misrepresentation, or other criminal activity or misconduct, the Secretary shall refer the debt to the Office of the Inspector General for review.
( 3 ) Upon the determination of the Office of the Inspector General that a claim is based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of the antitrust laws, or involves fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any party having an interest in the claim, the Secretary shall promptly refer the case to the Department of Justice for action.
( b ) *Exception in the account of an accountable official.* The standards in this part do not apply to compromise of an exception in the account of an accountable official.
( c ) *Interagency claims.* This part does not apply to claims between Federal agencies. The Department will attempt to resolve interagency claims by negotiation in accordance with EO 12146.