alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Dan O'Brien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Flexible Solutions
International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 12, 2005

/s/DAN O'BRIEN
Dan O'Brien
CEO
# Provision of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Brazil 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and the] Secretary of Defense

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C 2291-4), I hereby certify, with respect to Brazil, that (1) interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country's airspace is necessary because of the extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; and (2) that country has appropriate procedures in place to protect against innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with such interdiction, which shall at a minimum include effective means to identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against the aircraft. 

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                     and to notify the Congress of this determination.                

[FR Doc. 06-9158

Billing code 4710-10-P
§ 2556.740 May VISTAs participate in political fundraising activities? ( a ) Provided that paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section are fully adhered to, and in accordance with the prohibitions set forth in § 2556.710, a VISTA may: ( 1 ) Make a political contribution to a political party, political group, campaign committee of a candidate for public office in a partisan election;
( 2 ) Attend a political fundraiser; and
( 3 ) Solicit, accept, or receive uncompensated volunteer services for a political campaign from any individual.
( b ) A VISTA may participate in fundraising activities as long as such participation: ( 1 ) Does not interfere with the performance of, or availability to perform, their assigned VISTA project duties;
( 2 ) Does not interfere with the provision of service in the VISTA program;
( 3 ) Does not involve any use of VISTA assistance, resources or funds;
( 4 ) Would not result in the identification of the VISTA as being a participant in or otherwise associated with the VISTA program;
( 5 ) Is not conducted during scheduled VISTA service hours; and
( 6 ) Does not interfere with the full-time commitment to remain available for VISTA service without regard to regular working hours, at all times during periods of service, except for authorized periods of leave.
( c ) A VISTA may not knowingly: ( 1 ) Personally solicit, accept, or receive a political contribution from another individual;
( 2 ) Personally solicit political contributions in a speech or keynote address given at a fundraiser;
( 3 ) Allow their perceived or actual affiliation with the VISTA program, or their official title as a VISTA, to be used in connection with fundraising activities; or
( 4 ) Solicit, accept, or receive uncompensated individual volunteer services from a subordinate (*e.g.,* a leader may not solicit, accept or receive a political contribution from a VISTA).
( d ) Except for VISTAs who reside in municipalities or political subdivisions designated under 5 CFR part 733, no VISTA may accept or receive a political contribution on behalf of an individual who is a candidate for local partisan political office and who represents a political party.
# EUR-Lex - 12006E109 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12006E109

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VII - Economic and monetary policy - Chapter 2 - Monetary policy - Article 109 **

*
Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0089 - 0089 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0077 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0222 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0037 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available) *

Article 109

Each Member State shall ensure, at the latest at the date of the establishment of the ESCB, that its national legislation including the statutes of its national central bank is compatible with this Treaty and the Statute of the ESCB.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 264.81 What expenditures qualify for Territories to meet the Matching Grant MOE requirement? To meet the Matching Grant MOE requirements, Territories may count: ( a ) Territorial expenditures made in accordance with §§ 263.2, 263.3, 263.4, and 263.6 of this chapter that are commingled with Federal TANF funds or made under a segregated TANF program; and
( b ) Territorial expenditures made pursuant to the regulations at 45 CFR parts 1355 and 1356 for the Foster Care and Adoption Assistance programs and section 477 of the Act for the Independent Living program.
MEMORANDUM

To : File

From : Marc Thomas Subject : Meeting with Forest Products Industry

Date : October 14, 2010

On October 13, 2010, EPA met with representatives from the forest products industry to discuss their comments regarding how various secondary materials common to the forest products industry are characterized in th e proposed rule, “Ide ntification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes.” Representative s discussed (1) the legal issues raised in their comments; (2) why various forest products indus try secondary materials (specifically resinated wood, wastewater treatment residua ls, recycling process residual s, and urban wood), should not

be classified as solid wastes in the final rule ; and (3) their belief that the petition process is unworkable as proposed. EPA aske d clarifying questions regardi ng the information presented.

The agenda for the meeting is attached as Att achment A. The list of meeting attendees is attached as Attachment B. Representatives al so provided several pictures of how recycling process residuals are generated and managed, as well as some sample analyses of these materials,

both of which are attached as Attachment C. Additionally, represen tatives provided three articles regarding the presence of formaldehyde in resinated wood re siduals. These are collectively attached as Attachment D.

Attachments
|                                                                        |  |             
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |  | Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) by First California Financial Group, Inc. (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2007



/s/ C. G. KumC. G. Kum President and Chief Executive
Officer




/s/ Romolo SantarosaRomolo Santarosa Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
#### A. A. Sparks, Receiver, *v.*Warren Estabrooks.

October Term, 1899.

Present: Tait, O. X, Howell, Tyler, Munson, Thompson and Watson, JX

Opinion filed January 22, 1900.

*Action at law by receiver*— Murtey, *Receiver,*v. *Allen,*71 Yt. 377, is referred to as decisive of this case, it being an action at law by a receiver.

Special assumpsit. Heard on demurrer. Caledonia County, June Term, 1899, *Thompson,*J., presiding. Demurrer overruled strictly *proforma*and without hearing, and declaration adjudged sufficient. The defendant excepted.

*Bates, May <& Simonds*for the plaintiff.

*Dunnett & Slack*for the defendant.

Tyler, J.

The declaration alleges that the Fidelity Mutual Eire Insurance Company of Philadelphia issued and delivered certain fire insurance policies to the defendant, who thereby became a member of the company and bound to pay all assessments, within certain limits, duly levied upon him by the directors; that certain assessments were duly levied, and that the defendant refused to pay the am'ount due from him. The action is brought in the name of the company’s receiver who was duly appointed by a competent court in Philadelphia. The *102case comes here upon the defendant’s demurrer to the declaration.

The question of the right of a party to maintain an action '■at law in his own name, when he has not the legal title to the property in controversy, is decided in *Murtey, Receiver,*v. *Allen,*71 Vt. 377. For the reasons stated in that case, *the gyro forma judgment, overruling the demurrer and adjudging the declaration and amendments thereto sufficient, reversed’, demurrer sustained; declaration and amendments adjudged insufficient, and cause remanded.*
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:11-cv-00951-CKK Document 1 Filed 05/23/11 Page 7 of 7
FILED: April 9, 1996

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2600
(CA-94:82-1)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus

CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK, INCORPORATED;
MARTIN MAWYER,

Defendants - Appellees.

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE; AMERICAN
CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF VIRGINIA

Amici Curiae.

ORDER

On December 7, 1995, upon consent of the partles, the Democratic National
Committee filed a brief as amicus curiae. The Democratic National Committee has filed a

motion for expanded and divided time to participate in oral argument and the parties have

filed responses to the motion.


The Court denies the motion of the Democratic Natlonal Committee for expanded
and divided argument time.
For the Court

fs! Bert M. Montague
Clerk
#### § 287.50 What are the funding periods for NEW Program grants?

NEW Program funds are for operation of the NEW Program for a 12-month period from July 1 through June 30.
Skip to main content    

Text Size: -A+A

 Current Size: 100%

            - About               - What We Do
              - Meet the Inspector General
              - Headquarters and Locations
              - Organization Chart
              - Frequently Asked Questions
            - OIG Offices
            - Hotline
            - Careers

## Sidebar Menu

-  Reports    -  All OIG Reports 
  -  Audits and Evaluations 
  -  Compliance Reviews and Inspections 
  -  Management Alerts and Management Advisories 
  -  Risk Assessments 
  -  White Papers 
  -  Status and Special Reports 
  -  Administrative Inquiries 
  -  Other Action Items 
-  OIG Publications    -  Management and Performance Challenges 
  -  Annual Plan 
  -  Strategic Plan 
  -  Semiannual Report to Congress 
  -  Compendium of Recommendations 
  -  Press Releases 
  -  Testimony 
  -  Current Peer Review Reports 

# Semiannual Report to Congress

### 2023

Twenty-Seventh Semiannual Report to Congress

Twenty-Sixth Semiannual Report to Congress

### 2022

Twenty-Fifth Semiannual Report to Congress

Twenty-Fourth Semiannual Report to Congress

### 2021

Twenty-Third Semiannual Report to the Congress

Twenty-Second Semiannual Report to the Congress

### 2020

Twenty-First Semiannual Report to the Congress

Twentieth Semiannual Report to the Congress

### 2019

Nineteenth Semiannual Report to the Congress

Eighteenth Semiannual Report to the Congress

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Footer

-  FHFA.gov 
-  Accessibility 
-  Contact Us 
-  Media and Press Inquiries  
-  Privacy Program 
-  Plain Writing Act 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
-  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
-  Oversight.gov 
-  USA.gov 
-  The White House 
-  Notices 
-  Digital Government Strategy 
-  Open Government 
-  Information Quality 
-  No FEAR Act 
-  Prohibited Personnel Practices 
-  Multilingual Content 
-  Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002 

400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20219 (202) 730-0880
# inventory Expert Service

A division of the American Chemical Socie~ P~one: 800-63 I- 1884, 614-447-3600 (ext. 2308) Fax: 614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES-ORDER NUMBER: 70139 REGISTRY NUMBER: 474510-57-1 

### CA INDEX NAME l-Propanone, l,l’-(methylenedi-4,l-phenylene)bis[2-hydroxy-2-methyl_

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. If this box is checked, CAS has made correctlon(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same correctlon(e) to you~ PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

## 23. 1540 Olentan~/Rh~ Road P.O. Box 3343 Cotumbu,, Ohio43210-0334
June 15, 2015

Mr. Orly Bisquera 

Microdesk Inc. 

20 Pacifica 

Irvine, CA 92618 

Dear Mr. Bisquera: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2107), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[109th Congress Public Law 268]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ268.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 681]]

Public Law 109-268
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To provide funding authority to facilitate the evacuation of persons 
   from Lebanon, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 4, 2006 -  [S. 
                                3741]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING AUTHORITY.

    (a) Increase in Available Funds for Emergency Evacuations.--
Notwithstanding the transfer restrictions under section 402 of the 
Science, State, Justice, Commerce, and Related Agencies Appropriations 
Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-108), the second proviso under the headings 
``DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCY - DEPARTMENT OF STATE - 
Administration of Foreign Affairs - diplomatic and consular 
programs'' <<NOTE: 119 Stat. 2319.>> is amended by striking 
``$4,000,000'' and inserting ``$19,000,000''.

    (b) Use of Certain Funds.--Amounts appropriated or otherwise made 
available by chapter 8 of title II of division B of Public Law 109-148 
under the heading ``emergencies in the diplomatic and consular service'' 
and any other unobligated amounts in the ``Emergencies in the Diplomatic 
and Consular Service'' account may be made available to cover the costs 
of facilitating the evacuation under section 4 of the State Department 
Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2671) of persons from Lebanon 
on or after July 16, 2006.

    Approved August 4, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3741:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 26, considered and passed Senate.
            July 28, considered and passed House, amended.
            July 31, Senate concurred in House amendment.

                                  <all>
```
[4910-I3-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "CUJU<ESrE;

IlOloTl"",n'OOL

Federal Aviation Administration 11[P-T. T

IS(; SV"OOL

infonnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identi fy

Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model Avro 146-RJ an :9

SAe 146 Airplanes

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). d';;/.~ ZJ {~{/

~OIIl "'G SI" 180L

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product - '7

NITIA'-""IG

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness C.?t--

m

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

14 CFR ParI 39

IDocketNo. FAA~**; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-012-AD] ';rc;IO- O}.').;l..

RlN 2120-AA64

o

A potential fleet wide problem has been identi fled regarding the

interchanging of wing links on all SAe 146 & AVRO 146-RJ aircraft

during scheduled maintenance. Some operators erroneously believed that

these parts were interchangeable. The effects of changing winglinks has

resulted in either a shorter or longer 'wing link being fitted, which

introduces local stresses in the wing top and bottom surfaces local to rib 2,

wing links and wing link fitting attachment and the fuselage local to

Frames 26 and 29. This condition, ifnot corrected, could result in a

reduction of structural integrity of the fuselage/wing attachment with

possible catastropbic consequences.

condition as;

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe ,,~~~- t t't

KOUTIN'; SYM

TI,

INIT'AJ's','G The unsafe condition could result in loss of a wing or controllability of the airplane.

proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition