alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,166
<INVENTORY>                                     32,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,999
<PP&E>                                           5,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,076
<BONDS>                                         95,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,251
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (82,661)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,260
<SALES>                                        154,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,157
<CGS>                                          105,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (428)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3





Power of Attorney


This Power of Attorney (hereinafter referred to as “This Power of Attorney”) is executed by Bin Zhao (ID No. [***]) on June 18, 2015 and issued to _______(ID No. __________) (hereinafter referred to as “Assignee”).


I, Bin Zhao, hereby irrevocably grant the Assignee a full power of attorney, and authorize the Assignee to represent me as my proxy, in the name of me and at his/her own will and discretion to exercise the following rights enjoyed for being a shareholder of Shanghai Zhaoyan Network Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”):


		
	(1)
	propose to convene and attend shareholders’ meetings according to the Company’s articles of association as my proxy;




		
	(2)
	exercise the voting rights as my proxy on all the items discussed and to be resolved on the shareholders’ meetings, including without limitation to the appointment and election of the directors of the Company and other senior management that shall be appointed or dismissed by the shareholders’ meeting;




		
	(3)
	exercise other shareholder’s voting rights given by the Company’s article of association (including any other voting rights of shareholders given by the amended article of association) as my proxy.




The Assignee is entitled to re-authorize or assign his/her above-mentioned rights to any other person or entity at his/her own discretion and without giving a prior notice to me or obtaining my prior consent. 


I, hereby irrevocably acknowledge that, unless being required to change the Assignee by Dayin Network Technology Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”), this Power of Attorney shall be continuously effective and valid until the expiration or early termination date of the Voting Rights Proxy Agreement executed by the WFOE, the Company and the Company’s Shareholders on June 18, 2015.


I hereby authorize.


	
		
	Name:
	Bin Zhao

	 
	 

	Signature:
	/s/ Bin Zhao

	Date:
	June 18, 2015
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement NSPS Docket

FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

DATE: October 31, 2008

SUBJECT: October 31, 2008 Meeting by teleconference between US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and representatives of Lafarge North America Inc.

Meeting Participants

Keith Barnett, USEPA Elineth Torres, USEPA Steve Fruh, USEPA Mike Laney, RTI (contractor to EPA) Steve Kohl, Warner, Norcross and Judd LLP (Outside counsel to Lafarge) Mike Pelan, Lafarge North America Inc. Bill Voshell, Lafarge North America, Inc. Craig Campbell, Lafarge North America Inc.

Information discussed in the Meeting

This meeting was to discuss concerns raised by Lafarge on the proposed amendments to the NSPS for Portland cement Manufacturing. Comments made by Lafarge in the meeting
included:

• Lafarge noted that low volatile fuels will not create as many the C-H radicals as high
volatile fuels. This increases NOx emissions.

• Lafarge has an internal burnability index. The Davenport Iowa kiln is an example of a hard burning mix. NOx emissions from this kiln are 4.0 lb/ton clinker.

• Lafarge suggested we look at the NOx BACT determination for the Holcim plant at
St. Genevieve.

• Lafarge noted that their Caldera, Alabama kiln emits NOx at a level of 1.5 to 2.7 lb/ton clinker, but their Sugar Creek, Missouri emits at 3.0 to 4.5 lb/ton clinker. Both kilns are preheater/precalciners and are the same age.

• The guarantee by FL Smidth for a new Joppa kiln with SNCR was 2.0 lb/ton clinker.

• They provided data for guarantees for their world-wide kilns. Uncontrolled NOx emissions range from 2.0 to 5.0 lb/ton clinker.

• NOx emissions from long kilns range from 4.0 to 25 lb/ton clinker.

• If you modify a cement kiln you will trip PSD.
Keene District Court,

No. 5701.

#### State *v.*Kenneth Keating.

Argued December 6, 1967.

Decided December 29, 1967.

*403
      *George S. Pappagianis,*Attorney General and *G. Wells Anderson,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mr. Anderson*orally ), for the State.

*Bell & Kennedy (Mr. Ernest L. Bell III*orally ), for the defendant.

Griffith, J.

On August 16, 1967, at 10:10 P. M. cruiser officer Moffitt of the Keene police department stopped the defendant’s car on Main Street after having observed the defendant commit the offense of speeding, a misdemeanor. Moffitt was on the way to answer an emergency call, and instructed the defendant to go to the police station and wait for him there. When Moffitt later went to the station he found that the defendant had not been there. The defendant was located later in the evening by another officer who required the defendant to wait until Moffitt arrived and took him to the police station at approximately 2:10 A. M. The defendant posted bail and appeared in court August 22 to answer to a complaint for speeding. At the conclusion of the State’s case the defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that there had been an illegal arrest. The court found that there had been an illegal arrest, but denied the motion to dismiss on the grounds that this had no effect on the case.

It is unnecessary to decide whether the defendant was legally arrested since even if he were not the motion to dismiss was properly denied. The defendant was before the court and pleaded to a complaint drawn subsequent to the arrest.

The universal rule appears to be that the manner in which a defendant is brought before a court is no bar to the court’s jurisdiction to try the case nor may it successfully be set up as a bar to a conviction. *State*v. *Baron,*106 N. H. 149, 150; *Albrecht*v. *United States,*273 U. S. 1, 3; *People*v. *Smith,*11 Ill. 2d 280; *White*v. *United States,*328 F. 2d 304 (8th Cir. 1964); *Howard*v. *District of Columbia,*132 A. 2d 150 (D.C. App. 1957); *People*v. *Miller,*235 Mich. 340; *Commonwealth*v. *Gorman,*288 Mass. 294. See 22 C.J.S., Criminal Law, *s.*144; 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Arrest, *s.*116; 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law, *s.*380; Annot. 56 A.L.R. 260.

*404The true reason for the rule lies in the fact that the illegal arrest is not relevant to his trial and conviction under a subsequent valid complaint. We are not here concerned with evidence tainted because it has been seized as a result of an illegal arrest nor with a confession obtained as a result of an illegal arrest. The defendant was in court to answer a valid complaint; if he had not appeared a warrant could properly have been issued for his arrest. Neither the complaint nor the evidence that brought about his conviction were the result of his arrest.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26532]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9017-8]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 10/27/2014 Through 10/31/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140314, Draft EIS, HUD, CA, Potrero HOPE SF Master Plan 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 12/22/2014, Contact: Eugene Flannery 415-
701-5598.
EIS No. 20140315, Final Supplement, BLM, AK, Alpine Satellite 
Development Plan for the Proposed Greater Mooses Tooth One Development 
Project, Review Period Ends: 12/08/2014, Contact: Bridget Psarianos 
907-271-4208.
EIS No. 20140316, Second Draft Supplement, BOEM, AK, Chukchi Sea 
Planning Area, Oil and Gas Lease Sale 193, Comment Period Ends: 12/22/
2014, Contact: Michael Routhier 907-334-5200.
EIS No. 20140317, Final EIS, USACE, AL, Update of the Water Control 
Manual for the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River Basin in Georgia and 
Alabama, Review Period Ends: 12/08/2014, Contact: Lewis Sumner 251-694-
3857.
EIS No. 20140318, Draft EIS, USFS, CA, Green-Horse Habitat Restoration 
and Maintenance Project, Comment Period Ends: 12/22/2014, Contact: 
Jason Fallon 530-242-5557.
EIS No. 20140319, Draft EIS, USFWS, CA, Measure M Natural Community 
Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 01/
29/2015, Contact: Jonathan Snyder 760-431-9440.
EIS No. 20140320, Final Supplement, FTA, CA, Mid-Coast Corridor Transit 
Project/Record of Decision, Contact: Alexander Smith 415-744-3133. 
Under MAP 21 Section 1319, FTA has issued a Final EIS and ROD. 
Therefore, the 30-day review/wait period under NEPA does not apply to 
the above action.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140264, Draft Supplement, FHWA, IL, US 30 (FAP 309), From IL-
136 to IL-40, Comment Period Ends: 11/10/2014, Contact: Catherine A. 
Batey 217-492-4640. Revision to the FR Notice Published 09/19/2014; 
Extending Comment Period from 11/03/2014 to 11/10/2014.
EIS No. 20140281, Second Draft Supplement, FHWA, AK, Juneau Access 
Improvements Project, Comment Period Ends: 11/25/2014, Contact: Tim 
Haugh 907-586-7418. Revision to the FR Notice Published 09/26/2014; 
Extending Comment Period from 11/10/2014 to 11/25/2014.

    Dated: November 4, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-26532 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EX-34 (d)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471-3000
Facsimile (813) 286-6000

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria, that J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities
transactions backed by residential mortgages and home equity loans, for which
the Company acts as Custodian (the "Platform"), as of September 30, 2006 and for
the period from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 excluding the criteria
1122(d) (1)(i)-(iv), (2)(i)-(vii), (3)(i)-(iv), and (4)(iii)-(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the
individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period ended
September 30, 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


March 1, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41319 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. LUIS DAVID ROBLES-GARCIA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-832-1 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis David Robles-Garcia raisesarguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
#### § 286.60 Must Tribes obligate all Tribal Family Assistance Grant funds by the end of the fiscal year in which they are awarded?

No. A Tribe may reserve amounts awarded to it, without fiscal year limitation, to provide assistance, benefits, and services in accordance with the requirements under § 286.35 or § 286.40, if applicable.

[74 FR 25163, May 27, 2009]
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-149434) and Amendment No. 773 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The
      Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    June 5, 2020
#### George S. Goodale, *as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v.*The Central National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Opinion by

Bardy, J.
Exhibit
99.2





CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Mackenzie
Taylor Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Terry
Stimpson, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date:  January
10, 2010





TERRY
STIMPSON


Terry
Stimpson


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director











-1-
§ 410.2000 Establishment of the UC Office of the Ombuds. ( a ) The Unaccompanied Children Office of the Ombuds (hereafter, the “UC Office of the Ombuds”) is located within the Office of the ACF Assistant Secretary, and reports to the ACF Assistant Secretary.
( b ) The UC Office of the Ombuds shall be an independent, impartial office with authority to receive reports, including confidential and informal reports, of concerns regarding the care of unaccompanied children; to investigate such reports; to work collaboratively with ORR to potentially resolve such reports; and issue reports concerning its efforts.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Cancellation Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On December 8, 2006, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project on the Blue Mountain Ranger District of the Malheur National Forest, was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         (71 FR 71121). Forest Service has decided to cancel the preparation of this EIS. The NOI is hereby rescinded.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jerry Hensley, Project Manager, Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day, Oregon, telephone 541-575-3167, e-mail                         *jhensley@fs.fed.us.*

      ( print page 75228)    
Dated: December 8, 2006.

Gary L. Benes,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 06-9688 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
### Distribution

Test Procedures for



## Definition of Basic Model

Building Technologies Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

U .S. Department of Energy September 2 7, 2004

## Basic Model Overview

Purpose : t o re duce t e sti ng en a b li ng group products having essentially identical characteristics re spect e n ergy consumpt i on i nto s in gle Bas i c Bas i c del is t h e finest level d i sagg re gati on at wh i ch m a nu fact urers rate t h e efficienc y d istri b uti on t ransforme r M a nu facturers rate efficiency of each sit Mod e l e i ther test i ng represe ntative s a mple o r app l y i ng sub s tan ti ated ® Un i fo r m Test M et hod fo r M e a s u ri ng Consumpt i on

• Al t ern ative E fficiency D eter m i nat i on M ethod (AEDM) Note: B asi c M odel is used t o su b stanti ate an AEDM 2

## uhanges from the Previous Basic Model Definition Essent i a ll y tha s propo se d i n w i th Ba sic Mode l s hou l d t have any d i fferen ti ati ng electrical, physical fun cti on al feat u res th at affe ct en e rgy consump ti on. " Omits th e p rovisi on t h at tra n sformers within Basic

" op 

### erat e w ithi n 

### t h 

### e sa m 

### e vol tage range ", a s th is i s i n 

### re qu 

### ire m 

### e n 

### t Rev is e s a p rovisi on from " have a c ompa rab l e nom i na l output power ( kVA) rati ng " t o "h ave the s am e sta ndard ra ti ng " Defi ne s standard A ratings as those app e a ri ng i n IEEE C57.12.00 and °12°1 Stake ho l d ers h ad s o ught basic model to b e a ll des i gns hav i ng nom i n al rati n g, h owever th is is i ncon sis tent w i th natu re g roup i ng s the B asi c el i s m ean t to perm i t

3on% 

## tsa -%sic Model Definition

" B a s i c mod e l m ea n s a group of distribution a si ng l e manu facturer , t h at have th e same i ns u l at i on (i. e ., li qu i d -i mme rs ed o r dry -typ e ), have th e sa me numbe r pha s es ( i. e ., s i ng l e o r th re e ), h ave th e sa m e s ta nd ard rati ng, d 

### iffe 

### rent 

## iat

## i ng 

### elect 

### r

## i c

### al, p hy

### si c

### al o 

### r functiona 

### l fe 

### atures that affect energy 

### c o 

### n sump

### ti on 

### ." Standard VA Ratings for D istributi o n Trans fo rm ers Single Phase Three Phase

kVA 10* 167 15 300 15 250 30 500 25 333 45 750 37.5 500 75 1000 50 667 112.5 1500 75 833 1 50 2 0 00 100 225 2500 * In the Department's current definition of a distribution transformer, 1 OkVA is a standard rating for liquid

- immersed transformers 4

## Other Issues ? IN An opportunity for stakeholders discuss ot 

### th e ba si c el defi n iti o n for d i st ri bu ti on

5
#### § 287.105 What provisions of the Social Security Act govern the NEW Program?

NEW Programs are subject only to those requirements at section 412(a)(2) of the Act, as amended by PRWORA, titled “Grants for Indian Tribes that Received JOBS Funds.”