alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., App. 2), announcement is made of the following Committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program Subcommittee.                    

*Dates of Meeting:*                         January 24-25, 2006.                    

*Location:*                         Radisson Hotel Hampton, 700 Settlers Landing Road, Hampton, VA 23669.                    

*Time:*                         0800-1700 hours, January 24, 2006; 0800-1030 hours, January 25, 2006.                    

*Proposed Agenda:*                         Review and discuss the Junior and Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs; incentive-based scholarships initiatives; academic accreditation agencies and procedures; curriculum review, revision and validation; and the growth of Military Science and Leadership as a college minor.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Pierre Blackwell, U.S. Army Cadet Command (ATCC-TR), Fort Monroe, VA 23651 at (757) 788-4522.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-99  Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### § 411.72 Reporting to UCs.

Following an investigation by the appropriate investigating authority into a UC's allegation of sexual abuse or sexual harassment, ORR must notify the UC in his/her preferred language of the result of the investigation if the UC is still in ORR care and custody and where feasible. If a UC has been released from ORR care when an investigation is completed, ORR should attempt to notify the UC. ORR may encourage the investigating agency to also notify other complainants or additional parties notified of the allegation of the result of the investigation.
No. 5521.

#### John Clark *v.*The State.

Unlawfully Fencing the Land of Another— Evidence.—See the opinion for the substance of evidence held insufficient to support a conviction for unlawfully fencing the land of another.

Appeal from the County Court of Falls. Tried below before Z. I. Harlan, Esq., special County Judge.

The opinion states the case. The penalty imposed was a fine of fifty cents per acre for four acres of land.

*619Opinion delivered June 15, 1887.

No brief for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

This is an information for unlawfully, willfully and knowingly fencing the lands of another.

This appears to be a case wherein there is a contention between two adjoining land owners as to the true location of their division line. Whatever a proper civil action might determine as to where the land of the one begins and the other ends, it is clear that the case does not exist here to which the Act of February 7, 1884, was meant to apply. Appellant appears to have all along made claim to that portion of the land upon which the fence was erected, and it also appears that his vendors made a similar claim. A criminal prosecution is not the form of. action in which to test property rights. Upon this subject Mr. Green-leaf has well said: '‘Where the goods were taken under a claim of right, if the prisoner appears to have had any fair color of title, *or if the title of the prosecutor be brought into doubt at all,*the court will direct an acquittal, it being improper to try such disputes in a form of process affecting men’s lives and liberties or reputation.” (Vol. 3, sec. 151, note 1.)

Because of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A)
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Postbinder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Defense Industries
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 23, 2005

/S/ Joseph Postbinder
---------------------
Joseph Postbinder

Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0445 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DUSTIN WADE SORLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2024

02/28/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0445
#### § 16.9 How the Board will promote development of the record.

The Board may, at the time it acknowledges an appeal or at any appropriate later point, request additional documents or information; request briefing on issues in the case; issue orders to show cause why a proposed finding or decision of the Board should not become final; hold preliminary conferences (generally by telephone) to establish schedules and refine issues; and take such other steps as the Board determines appropriate to develop a prompt, sound decision.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6693

TERRENCE L. DURDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00888-GBL) Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 14, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrence L. Durden, Appellant Pro Se. Karri B. Atwood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Terrence L. Durden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Durden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Diagnostic Imaging International Corp. (the Company) on 10-KSB/A as amended for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Jagodnik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                  |                                                 
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                 
|September 4, 2008 | /s/ Richard Jagodnik                            
|                  | Richard Jagodnik                                
|                  | Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Armando Geday, Chief Executive Officer of Conexant Systems, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Conexant Systems,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis Quarterly Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this Quarterly Report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: August 16, 2004   /s/ Armando Geday  Armando Geday  Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 3 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 4 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 5 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 6 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 7 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 8 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 9 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 10 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 11 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 12 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 13 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 14 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 15 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 16 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 17 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 18 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 19 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 20 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 21 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 22 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 23 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 24 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 25 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 26 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 27 of 28
Case 1:14-cv-01419-CRC Document 52 Filed 09/19/16 Page 28 of 28
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-501.6 

________________________________________________________________________ 

COMPACT OF FREE ASSOCIATION 

Federal Programs and Services 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the MARSHALL ISLANDS 

Signed at Majuro March 23, 2004 

 with 

Annex 

 and 

Agreed Minute 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MARSHALL ISLANDS 

 

 Compact of Free Association: Federal Programs and 

 Services 

 Agreement signed at Majuro March 23, 2004; 

 Entered into force May 1, 2004. 

 With annex and agreed minute.
Exhibit 10.23


 


Amendment
to


HYCROFT
MINING CORPORATION


Restricted
stock unit agreement


(PERFORMANCE-VESTING)


 


THIS AMENDMENT (the
 “Amendment”) to the Hycroft Mining Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Performance-Vesting) by and
between Hycroft Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and Randy Buffington (the “Participant”)
made and entered into as of February 20, 2019 (the “Agreement”) is made as of May 29, 2020 (the “Effective
Date”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Hycroft
Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) sponsors the Plan for the benefit of its employees
and its stockholders;


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has entered into that certain Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2020, as amended as of February 26,
2020, by and among the Company, Mudrick Capital Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“MUDS”) and
MUDS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (each of MUDS and MUDS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a “Buyer”);


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has agreed to assign the Plan to a Buyer or one of their affiliates and the Buyers have agreed that a Buyer or an affiliate
will assume sponsorship of the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, it
is desirable to amend the Agreement to reflect changes resulting from the foregoing.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended as of the Effective Date so that: (i) references to the “Corporation” in the
Agreement be revised to mean “Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation” and (ii) references to the “Plan”
in the Agreement be revised to mean the “Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation 2020 Performance and Incentive Pay Plan.”


 


[Signature page to follow]


 






     


    


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	HYCROFT MINING CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Stephen M. Jones
	 	 	Stephen Jones,
	 	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




 


	 	PARTICIPANT
	 	 
	 	/s/ Randy Buffington
	 	Randy Buffington




 






     - 2 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 13, 2007, 8:00 a.m. to February 15, 2007, 5 p.m., Hyatt Regency bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 30, 2006, 71 FR 69211.                

The meeting notice is changed to reflect the name of the committee from “SPORE II” to “SPORE in Prostate, Breast and Skin Cancer.” The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: December 20, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9888 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09639**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09639\09639_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09639\09639_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09639\09639_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09639\09639_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09639\09639_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09639\09639_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09639\09639_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09639\09639_Certification Document.pdf Plant certification statement x 09639\Supporting Documentation\09639_Water balance diagram 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09639\Supporting Documentation\09639_Water balance diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09639\Supporting Documentation\EPA ICR Map 1 A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09639\09639_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09639\09639_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Frank Donley, Respondent, *v.*Glens Falls Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Donley*v. *Glens Falls Ins. Co.,*126 App. Div. 922, affirmed.

(Argued June 8, 1909;

decided October 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 2, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance.

*Hiram R. Wood*for appellant.

*Calvin J. Huson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of *Donley*v. *Glens Falls Insurance Company*(184 N. Y. 107); no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.