alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1991 

Adjourned January 3, 1992 

Convened January 3, 7992 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, April 2, 1992 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Cal end ...... Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

17 EX. E, International Covenant on Civil and Mar 24 92 Reported 

95-2 Political Rights favorably by Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with reservations, 

understandings, 

declarations and a 

proviso. (Printed 

renort--Ex. Rent. 102-23). 
Calendar Message 

No. No. 

* 546 957 

* 547 988 

2 

NOMINATIONS 

Nominee, Office, And Predecessor 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Edward Joseph Perkins, of Oregon, a Career 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, 

Class of Career Minister, to be the 

Representative of the United States of 

America to the United Nations with rank 

and status of Ambassador Extraordinary and 

Plenipotentiary, and the Representative of 

the United States of America in the 

Security Council of the United Nations. 

Thomas R. Pickering, of New Jersey, a 

Career Member of the Senior Foreign 

Service, with the personal rank of Career 

Ambassador, to be Ambassador Extraordinary 

and Plenipotentiary of the United States 

of America to India. 

Reported 

Bv 

Apr 1, 92 Mr. Pell, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

Do. 

.. *S1gntf1es nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning George Mu, and ending Paul T. Walters, which nominations 

were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of March 18, 1992.
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brad J. Peters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC"), formerly Integrated Performance Systems, Inc. ("IPS");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for GIC and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of GIC's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in GIC's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during GIC's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect GIC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. GIC's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect GIC's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in GIC's internal control over financial reporting,

|Date: December 15, 2006 | /s/    BRAD J. PETERS  
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | Brad J. Peters         
|                        | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1552 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1552

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount 
           allowed as a deduction for start-up expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2009

   Mr. Kratovil (for himself and Mr. Lee of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount 
           allowed as a deduction for start-up expenditures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT ALLOWED AS DEDUCTION FOR START-UP 
              EXPENDITURES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 195 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Special rule for taxable years beginning in 2009, 
        2010, or 2011.--In the case of a taxable year beginning in 
        2009, 2010, or 2011, paragraph (1)(A)(ii) shall be applied--
                    ``(A) by substituting `$20,000' for `$5,000', and
                    ``(B) by substituting `$75,000' for `$50,000'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40160 Conference Calendar

__________________

ROLAND GERARD ARENAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus J.P. LUBY, Sheriff, ET AL., Defendants, DAVID SCHWARTZ, Police Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-93-CV-388 - - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of appellant Roland Arenas to dismiss this appeal relative to appellee David Schwartz is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Arenas's motion to add additionalNo. 95-40160 -2- unnamed defendants, as stated in his "amended pleading," is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED as moot. See Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1987). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee Schwartz's motion for an extension of time to file his brief is DENIED as moot.
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO THE

CHECKPOINT THERAPEUTICS, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2015 INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Amendment to the Checkpoint Therapeutics,
Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted, effective as of the date indicated below.


 


W I T N E S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. (the
 “Company”) maintains the Plan, and the Plan is currently in effect; and


 


WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Plan authorizes
the Board or the Committee (as defined in the Plan) to amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations, including stockholder approval
for certain amendments; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board has approved and authorized
this Amendment to the Plan and has recommended that the stockholders of the Company approve this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to and effective as of the date of stockholder approval hereof:


 


1. Section 5.1.   of
the Plan is hereby amended by increasing the share references in such section from 5,000,000 to 9,000,000 (a 4,000,000 increase
in the overall share reserve), so that such section reads in its entirety as follows:


 


“5.1. NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject to adjustment
as provided in Sections 5.2 and Section 15.1, the aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant
to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 9,000,000. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued upon exercise of Incentive
Stock Options granted under the Plan shall be 9,000,000.”


 


2. Except as specifically set forth
herein, the terms of the Plan shall be and remain unchanged, and the Plan as amended shall remain in full force and effect.


 


The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being
the Amendment to the Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Incentive Plan, as adopted by the Board on March 3,
2020, and approved by the Company’s stockholders on June 4, 2020.


 


	 	CHECKPOINT THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James F. Oliviero	 
	  	 	James F. Oliviero, President and CEO
§ 1321.91 Family caregiver support services. ( a ) Family caregiver support services are community-based interventions set forth in Title III, part E of the Act, which meet standards set forth by the Assistant Secretary for Aging and which may be informed through the use of an evidence-informed or evidence-based caregiver assessment, including: ( 1 ) Information to family caregivers about available services via public education;
( 2 ) Assistance to family caregivers in gaining access to the services through: ( i ) Individual information and assistance; or
( ii ) Case management or care coordination.
( 3 ) Individual counseling, organization of support groups, and caregiver training to assist family caregivers in those areas in which they provide support, including health, nutrition, complex medical care, and financial literacy, and in making decisions and solving problems relating to their caregiving roles;
( 4 ) Respite care to enable family caregivers to be temporarily relieved from their caregiving responsibilities; and
( 5 ) Supplemental services, on a limited basis, to complement the care provided by family caregivers. State agencies and AAAs shall define “limited basis” for supplemental services and may consider limiting units, episodes or expenditure amounts when making this determination.
( b ) State agencies shall ensure that there is a plan to provide each of the services authorized under this part in each planning and service area, or statewide in accordance with a funds distribution plan for single planning and service area States, subject to availability of funds under the Act.
( c ) To provide services listed in paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) of this section to family caregivers of adults aged 60 and older or of individuals of any age with Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder, the individual for whom they are caring must be determined to be functionally impaired because the individual: ( 1 ) Is unable to perform at least two activities of daily living without substantial assistance, including verbal reminding, physical cueing, or supervision;
( 2 ) At the option of the State agency, is unable to perform at least three such activities without such assistance; or
( 3 ) Due to a cognitive or other mental impairment, requires substantial supervision because the individual poses a serious health or safety hazard to themself or others.
( d ) All funds provided under Title III, part E of the Act must be distributed within a State pursuant to § 1321.49 or § 1321.51.
§ 2507.17 Fees overview. ( a ) AmeriCorps will charge fees for processing FOIA requests in accordance with the provisions of this subpart and with the OMB Guidelines, unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been granted under § 2507.24.
( b ) AmeriCorps will search for, review, and duplicate records in the most efficient and the least expensive manner.
( c ) AmeriCorps may properly charge for time spent searching even if it does not locate any responsive records or if it determines that the records are entirely exempt from disclosure.
( d ) When a request is made for commercial purposes, review fees will be assessed for the Agency's time spent on its initial analysis to determine whether an exemption applies to a record or portion of a record.
( e ) No charge will be made at the administrative review stage for review of exemptions that were applied at the initial review stage. However, if one or more exemptions are deemed to no longer apply, the costs associated with the Agency's re-review of the records to consider the use of other exemptions may be assessed as review fees.
( f ) Requesters may seek a fee waiver. AmeriCorps will consider requests for a fee waiver in accordance with the requirements in § 2507.24.
( g ) To resolve any fee issues that arise under this section, AmeriCorps may contact a requester for additional information.
#### §§ 401.3-401.11 [Reserved]
§ 605.52 Health, welfare, and other social services. ( a ) *General.* In providing health, welfare, or other social services or benefits, a recipient may not, on the basis of handicap: ( 1 ) Deny a qualified handicapped person these benefits or services;
( 2 ) Afford a qualified handicapped person an opportunity to receive benefits or services that is not equal to that offered nonhandicapped persons;
( 3 ) Provide a qualified handicapped person which benefits or services that are not as effective (as defined in § 605.4(b)) as the benefits or services provided to others;
( 4 ) Provide benefits or services in a manner that limits or has the effect of limiting the participation of qualified handicapped persons; or
( 5 ) Provide different or separate benefits or services to handicapped persons except where necessary provide qualified handicapped persons with benefits and services that are as effective as those provided to others.
( b ) *Notice.* A recipient that provides notice concerning benefits or services or written material concerning waivers of rights or consent to treatment shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that qualified handicapped persons, including those with impaired sensory or speaking skills, are not denied effective notice because of their handicap.
( c ) *Emergency treatment for the hearing impaired.* A recipient hospital that provides health services or benefits shall establish a procedure for effective communication with persons with impaired hearing for the purpose of providing emergency health care.
( d ) *Auxiliary aids.* ( 1 ) A recipient to which this subpart applies that employs fifteen or more persons shall provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, where necessary to afford such persons an equal opportunity to benefit from the service in question.
( 2 ) The Director may require recipients with fewer than fifteen employees to provide auxiliary aids where the provision of aids would not significantly impair the ability of the recipient to provide its benefits or services.
( 3 ) For the purpose of this paragraph, auxiliary aids may include brailled and taped material, interpreters, and other aids for persons with impaired hearing or vision.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of DB US Dollar Index
Bearish Master Fund (the Master Fund), a series of DB US Dollar Index Master Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Master Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Master Fund.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: June 25, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan       
|                     |  | Michael Gilligan           
|                     |  | Principal Financial Officer
Rockingham,

No. 5621.

#### Sally D. Collette *v.*Victor L. Collette.

Argued December 5, 1967.

Decided February 29, 1968.

*470
      *Wayne J. Mullavey*for the plaintiff, filed no brief.

*Shaw & Eldredge {Mr. Carleton Eldredge*orally), for the defendant.

Kenison, C. J.

This case presents the common but difficult question of deciding what is an equitable division of a husband’s salary for the benefit of his divorced wife and minor children. Neither the legislature nor this court has devised any litmus test that guarantees Solomonic certainty in determining the maximum or minimum amount of support that a wife and minor children are entitled to receive or the amount of salary that a husband is entitled to retain. *Ballou*v. *Ballou, 95*N. H. 105. The Trial Court is accorded a wide discretion in such matters both at the time of the original divorce decree and at any hearing for a modification of the support order. *Peterson*v. *Buxton,*108 N. H. 77, 78; *Benjamin*v. *Benjamin,*99 N. H. 117, 119; *Guggenheimer*v. *Guggenheimer,*99 N. H. 399, 403.

The parties were divorced in 1965 and by stipulation of the defendant approved by the court in 1966 the defendant agreed to pay $70 a week for the support of his three minor children. The defendant’s support payments are in arrears due in part to his failure to make money in a “full-time selling position” in 1966. He filed a motion to modify and reduce his support order of $70 a week and the Court reduced the weekly payment to $60. At the time of the hearing on this motion the defendant received “take home pay” of approximately $104 a week. The defendant’s exception to this order was reserved and transferred by *Grant,*J.

The defendant had the burden of showing that the support order was improper and unfair. 2A Nelson, Divorce and Annulment (Rev. 1961) *s.*17.08; *Fortuna*v. *Fortuna,*103 N. H. 547. While the order of the Trial Court is subject to review *(Taylor*v. *Taylor,*108 N. H. 193), it can be set aside only if the evidence demonstrates clearly an abuse of judicial discretion. *Kennard*v. *Kennard,*81 N. H. 509, 511. Considering all the *471circumstances including the financial straits of the mother and the three minor children and the father’s “take home pay” of $104 a week, we cannot say that the weekly support order of $60 constitutes an abuse of discretion. See Annots. 89 A.L.R. 2d 7; 1 A.L.R. 3d 382; *Peterson*v. Buxton, 108 N. H. 77.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 39]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 400]]

Public Law 112-39
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Chris Davis Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 12, 2011 -  [H.R. 1632]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5014 
Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant Chris Davis Post 
Office''.

    Approved October 12, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1632:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            June 21, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```