IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS 

AT CHATTANOOGA 

Denita Howard, 

Employee, 

v. 

USXpress Enterprises, Inc. 

Employer, 

And 

Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 

Insurance Carrier. 

) Docket No.: 2014-01-0002 

) 

) State File Number: 51504-2014 

) 

) Judge Thomas Wyatt 

) 

) 

) 

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER FOR MEDICAL BENEFITS AND 

DENYING TEMPORARY DISABILITY BENEFITS 

THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge upon 

the Request for Expedited Hearing filed on June 25, 2015, by the employee, Denita 

Howard, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239 (20 15). Ms. Howard 

presents two issues for determination in this telephonic Expedited Hearing. She seeks an 

order requiring the employer, USXpress Enterprises, Inc. (USX), to pay for emergency 

treatment she received following the alleged work injury. She also seeks temporary 

partial disability benefits from January 7, 2015, until February 18, 2015. For the reasons 

set forth below, the Court finds Ms. Howard is entitled to the requested medical benefits, 

but she is not entitled to the requested temporary partial disability benefits. 

History of Claim 

Ms. Howard is a twenty-eight year-old resident of Fayetteville, North Carolina. 

(T.R. 1 at 1.) She worked as a trainee truck driver for USX for approximately two weeks 

(Ex. 7) before she suffered injury when the tractor-trailer rig she operated overturned as 

she exited Interstate 10 near Acadia, Louisiana. (Ex. 10 at 1, 4.) Following the abovedescribed collision, Ms. Howard received emergency care at the American Legion 

Hospital in Jennings, Louisiana, for multiple contusions and a closed-head injury. (Ex. 

11.) 

Ms. Howard later received authorized care from Med One Care in Fayetteville, 

1 
North Carolina. (Ex. 9.) A Nurse Practitioner there referred Ms. Howard to a 

neurologist. !d. USX authorized neurological care by Dr. Venugopal Gadipudi. 

Following a January 7, 2015 office visit, Dr. Gadipudi completed a Final Medical 

Report wherein he released Ms. Howard to regular duty on January 7, 2015; placed her at 

maximum medical improvement as of December 18, 2014; and assigned no permanent 

impairment for her July 1, 2014 work injury. (Exs. 16, 17.) Ms. Howard received this 

information at her next scheduled appointment with Dr. Gadipudi on February 18, 2015. 

(Ex. 8 at 2.) 

USX's carrier, Liberty Mutual, terminated Ms. Howard's temporary total 

disability benefits on January 7, 2015, pursuant to Dr. Gadipudi's release of Ms. Howard 

to regular duty. (Ex. 18 at 1.) Liberty Mutual paid Jefferson Davis Emergency Group 

$314.92 by check dated June 19, 2015 (Exs. 14 at 2; 15.) 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 

General Legal Principles 

The Workers' Compensation Law shall not be remedially or liberally construed in 

favor of either party but shall be construed fairly, impartially and in accordance with 

basic principles of statutory construction favoring neither the employee nor 

employer. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-116 (2014). The employee in a workers' 

compensation claim has the burden of proof on all essential elements of a claim. Tindall 

v. Waring Park Ass 'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987);1 Scott v. Integrity Staffing 

Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. 

Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). An employee need not prove every element 

of his or her claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief at an 

expedited hearing. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 

TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 

20 15). At an expedited hearing, an employee has the burden to come forward with 

sufficient evidence from which the trial court can determine that the employee is likely to 

prevail at a hearing on the merits. !d. 

Medical Benefits 

The only medical benefit Ms. Howard sought during the Expedited Hearing was 

1 The Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board allows reliance on precedent from the Tennessee Supreme 

Court "unless it is evident that the Supreme Court's decision or rationale relied on a remedial interpretation of preJuly I, 2014 statutes, that it relied on specific statutory language no longer contained in the Workers' Compensation 

Law, and/or that it relied on an analysis that has since been addressed by the general assembly through statutory 

amendments." McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. 

LEXIS 6, *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). 

2 
payment of the charges of Jefferson Davis Emergency Group, LLC. (Exs. 6, 11.) USX 

and its carrier presented evidence documenting payment of the charge in question. (Exs. 

14 at 2; 15; 18 at 1.) Although the payment was less than the amount billed, the adjuster 

for USX' s carrier stated in her affidavit that the payment made to Jefferson Davis 

Emergency Group LLC was payment in full. (Exs. 6, 14 at 2, 15, 18 at 1.) Ms. Howard 

testified at the Expedited Hearing that she had not received a collection letter regarding 

the subject charge since the December 15, 2014 letter . (Ex. 6.) USX and its carrier 

agreed to appropriately respond if Ms. Howard receives further billing in connection with 

the subject charge. 

On the basis of the evidence introduced at the Expedited Hearing, the Court fmds 

that Ms. Howard will likely prevail at a hearing on the merits on the issue of the 

compensability of the bill she incurred from Jefferson Davis Emergency Group, LLC. 

The Court additionally finds that USX and its carrier paid the subject charge. However, 

should Ms. Howard receive further bills for this charge, the Court will require that, upon 

Ms. Howard's presentation of the bill, USX and/or its carrier shall investigate the bill and 

pay any valid charge remaining unpaid. Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-204 (2015). 

Temporary Partial Disability Benefits 

In Wilkins v. Kellogg Co., 48 S.W.3d 148, 151 (Tenn. 2001), the Supreme Court 

defined temporary partial disability as, "the time during which the injured employee is 

able to resume work before reaching maximum medical improvement." (Emphasis 

added.) Although the above-cited authority pre-dates the July 1, 2014 reforms to the 

Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law, it remains good law today. See Tennessee 

Code Annotated section 50-6-207(2)(C) (20 15), which provides that, if an employer paid 

temporary partial disability benefits after the date on which a workers ' compensation 

judge determined the injured employee attained maximum medical improvement, the 

employer is entitled to a credit against the employee's permanent disability award for the 

amount of temporary partial disability benefits paid after the date of maximum medical 

improvement. (Emphasis added.) 

Ms. Howard seeks additional temporary partial disability benefits between January 

7, 2015, the date USX stopped paying temporary benefits, until February 18, 2015, the 

date she learned Dr. Gadipudi earlier placed her at maximum medical improvement. Ms. 

Howard's position is contrary to Tennessee law, which provides that the date of 

maximum medical improvement terminates an employee's right to temporary disability 

benefits. 

Ms. Howard can succeed in her claim for additional temporary disability benefits 

only if she can establish Dr. Gadipudi's opinion is wrong or that he set the date of 

maximum medical improvement on a date later than January 7, 2015. Ms. Howard 

submitted no information that challenges the correctness of the date on which Dr. 

3 
Gadipudi set maximum medical improvement or indicates he set maximum medical 

improvement on a date other than December 18, 2014. 

The Court knows of no authority supporting the award of temporary disability 

benefits after the date of maximum medical improvement simply because nobody 

communicated the date of maximum medical improvement to the employee. 

Accordingly, the fact nobody communicated Dr. Gadipudi's assessment of maximum 

medical improvement to Ms. Howard until February 18, 2015, is inconsequential to her 

entitlement to temporary partial disability benefits. In view of the above, the Court finds 

that Ms. Howard is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on the issue of her 

entitlement to additional temporary partial disability benefits. 

USX requests reimbursement of temporary partial disability benefits paid after 

Dr. Gadipudi placed Ms. Howard at maximum medical improvement on December 18, 

2014. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(2)(C) (2015) provides, "[t]he 

employer shall be given credit against an award of permanent disability for any amount 

of temporary partial disability paid to the employee after the date on which the workers' 

compensation judge determines maximum medical improvement." (Emphasis added.) 

Section 50-6-207(2)(C) (2015) specifically provides that the employer's remedy for a 

payment of temporary partial disability benefits after the date of maximum medical 

improvement is a credit against the employee's permanent disability award. 

Accordingly, the Court defers USX's reimbursement claim until it determines Ms. 

Howard's right to permanent disability benefits. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 

1. USX and/or its workers' compensation carrier, Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., shall pay 

the July 1, 2014 charge of Jefferson Davis Emergency Group, LLC if not 

previously paid. 

2. If Ms. Howard receives future billings or collection notices in connection with the 

July 1, 2014 charge of Jefferson Davis Emergency Group, LLC, she shall provide 

the same to USX and/or its workers' compensation carrier, Liberty Mutual 

Insurance Company, and, upon receipt, USX and/or its carrier shall investigate the 

bill and pay any outstanding balance due or, if the bill is fully paid, seek to stop 

further billings or collection notices to Ms. Howard. 

3. Ms. Howard's claim for additional temporary partial disability benefits is denied 

on the basis of compensability. 

4. This matter is set for an Initial (Scheduling) Hearing on December 16, 2015, at 

9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. 

4 
ENTERED this the 16th day of October, 2015. 

fh~f!w/,~ Judge Thomas Wyatt 

Court of Workers' Compensation Claims 

Initial (Scheduling) Hearing: 

A Scheduling Hearing has been set with Judge Thomas Wyatt, Court of 

Workers' Compensation Claims. You must call 615-741-3061 or toll-free at 855-

747-1721 to participate in the Initial Hearing. 

Please Note: You must call in on the scheduled date/time to 

participate. Failure to call in may result in a determination of the issues without 

your further participation. All conferences are set using Central Time (CT). 

Right to Appeal: 

Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order 

to appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of 

Appeal, you must: 

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal." 

2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven business days of the 

date the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Expedited Hearing Order. 

3. Serve a copy of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing party. 

4. The appealing party is responsible for payment of a filing fee in the amount of 

$75.00. Within ten calendar days after the filing of a notice of appeal, payment 

must be received by check, money order, or credit card payment. Payments can be 

made in person at any Bureau office or by United States mail, hand-delivery, or 

other delivery service. In the alternative, the appealing party may file an Affidavit 

of Indigency, on a form prescribed by the Bureau, seeking a waiver of the filing 

fee. The Affidavit of lndigency may be filed contemporaneously with the Notice 

of Appeal or must be filed within ten calendar days thereafter. The Appeals Board 

will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying 

the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is 

practicable. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of 

5 
Indigency in accordance with this section shall result in dismissal of the 

appeal. 

5. The parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal, 

may request, from the Court Clerk, the audio recording of the hearing for the 

purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it 

with the Court Clerk within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited 

Hearing Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint statement of 

the evidence within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing 

Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and 

accurate account of what transpired in the Court of Workers' Compensation 

Claims and must be approved by the workers' compensation judge before the 

record is submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board. 

6. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory 

appeal, the appellant shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk within 

three business days of the expiration of the time to file a transcript or statement of 

the evidence, specifying the issues presented for review and including any 

argument in support thereof. A party opposing the appeal shall file a response, if 

any, with the Court Clerk within three business days of the filing of the appellant's 

position statement. All position statements pertaining to an appeal of an 

interlocutory order should include: ( 1) a statement summarizing the facts of the 

case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2) a statement 

summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3) a 

statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an argument, citing 

appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority. 

6 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order 

Denying Additional Medical and Temporary Disability Benefits was sent to the following 

recipients by the following methods of service on this the 16th day of October, 2015. 

Name Certified 

Mail 

Denita Howard, SelfRepresented Employee 

Charles Gilbreath, 

Employer's Attorney 

Via Via Service sent to: 

Fax Email 

X denita.howard@gmailcom 

X cgilbreath@noogalaw.com 

, Clerk of Court 

orkers' Compensation Claims 

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov 

7 
APPENDIX 

Exhibits: 

1. First Report of Injury; 

2. Signed Choice of Physician Form (C-42) designating U.S. HealthWorks Medical 

Group as authorized treating physician; 

3. Medical bill of Valley Radiology (for identification only); 

4. Letter from Jeremy D. Moses/Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. to Med One Care, with 

handwritten notations; 

5. Utilization Review correspondence; 

6. Collection letter dated December 15, 2014, from Trover Solutions, Inc. to Ms. 

Howard concerning charge of Jefferson Davis Emergency Group, LLC; 

7. Records of wages paid Ms. Howard by USX; 

8. Appointment card documenting Ms. Howard's February 18, 2015 appointment 

with Dr. Venugopal Galipudi at Carolina Neurology; 

9. Status Report documenting November 18, 2014 visit to Med One Care; 

10. State of Louisiana Uniform Motor Vehicle Traffic Crash Report; 

11.Medical Record documenting July 1, 2014 emergency visit at Jennings American 

Legion Hospital, Jennings, Louisiana; 

12.February 12, 2014 letter from the Division of Workers' Compensation to Ms. 

Howard; 

13.Final Medical Report ofNurse PractitionerS. McDonald dated January 6, 2015; 

14.Medical Cost Summary List documenting workers' compensation payments in the 

claim of Denita Howard; 

15.Liberty Mutual check documenting payment to Jefferson Davis Emergency 

Medical Group; 

16.Final Medical Report ofDr. Gadipudi dated January 7, 2015; 

17. January 6, 2015 letter from Dr. Gadipudi; and 

18. Affidavit of Amanda DeGeeter. 

Technical record:i 

1. Petition for Benefit Determination, filed March 19, 2015; 

2. Show Cause Order, filed July 16, 2015; 

3. Request for Expedited Hearing filed June 25, 2015; 

4. Defendants' Objection to the Setting of Ms. Howard's Expedited Hearing and 

Request for Relief Therefrom; Request for In-Person Hearing, filed August 17, 

2015; 

5. Ms. Howard's Position Statement, filed August 28, 2015; and 

6. Order Scheduling Telephonic Expedited Hearing, filed September 16,2015. 

i The Court did not consider attachments to Technical Record filings unless admitted into evidence during the 

Expedited Hearing. The Court considered factual statements in these filings or any attachments to them as 

allegations unless established by the evidence. 

8