alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 410.1201 Sponsors to whom ORR releases an unaccompanied child. ( a ) Subject to an assessment of sponsor suitability, when ORR determines that the detention of the unaccompanied child is not required either to secure the child's timely appearance before DHS or the immigration court, or to ensure the child's safety or that of others, ORR shall release a child from its custody without unnecessary delay, in the following order of preference, to: ( 1 ) A parent;
( 2 ) A legal guardian;
( 3 ) An adult relative;
( 4 ) An adult individual or entity designated by the parent or legal guardian as capable and willing to care for the unaccompanied child's well-being in: ( i ) A declaration signed under penalty of perjury before an immigration or consular officer; or
( ii ) Such other document that establishes to the satisfaction of ORR, in its discretion, the affiant's parental relationship or guardianship;
( 5 ) A licensed program willing to accept legal custody; or
( 6 ) An adult individual or entity seeking custody, in the discretion of ORR, when it appears that there is no other likely alternative to long term custody, and family unification does not appear to be a reasonable possibility.
( b ) ORR shall not disqualify potential sponsors based solely on their immigration status and shall not collect information on immigration status of potential sponsors for law enforcement or immigration enforcement related purposes. ORR shall not share any immigration status information relating to potential sponsors with any law enforcement or immigration enforcement related entity at any time.
( c ) In making determinations regarding the release of unaccompanied children to potential sponsors, ORR shall not release unaccompanied children on their own recognizance.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-506.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Information Exchange 

 Memorandum of Understanding Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Washington, Paris, and Bristol 

April 7 and 30 and May 6, 2004 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Defense: Information Exchange 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Washington, Paris, and Bristol 

 April 7 and 30 and May 6, 2004; 

 Entered into force May 6, 2004.
§ 2525.320 What steps are necessary to obtain forbearance in the repayment of a qualified student loan during an individual's term of service in an approved AmeriCorps position? ( a ) An Eligible Individual seeking forbearance must submit a request to the loan holder.
( b ) If, before approving a request for forbearance, the loan holder requires verification that the Eligible Individual is serving in an approved national service position, AmeriCorps will provide verification upon a request from the Eligible Individual or the loan holder.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:27 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Hi Bob,

Attached are the handouts from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_23_NCC_Handout1.pdf >> << 2060AR33_2014_04_23_NCC_Handout2.pdf >>

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guide lines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

When: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Robert Wyman, Lat ham & Watkins LLP on behalf of the National

Climate Coalition.
Strat Aero International Ph: 1.832.912.4273 Fax: 1.832.553.7975 www.strat-aero,com 

# Sk

August 21, 2015
U.S. Department of Transportatlon Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Modification to Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federat Aviation Regulations submitted May 5, 2015
Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for your consideration of Strat Aero international, Inc.'s 333 Exemption Request — Docket No. FAA-2015-1606. On behalf of Strat Aero, I woutd Ilke to request an amendment to our petition for exemption to add the DJI Inspire 1 sUAS to lhe list of aircraft for which we are requesting approval. This specific sUAS has been approved in over 100 granted 333 exemptions to date, and I will submit the user's manual to 333exemotions a

CZfaa.gov to further clarify safety and operational features of this aircraft. This addition to our petition for exemption will not change missions, training, and/or maintenance we perform. If you have questions or concems, please contact Mr. Jonathan Adams at 518-224-5759. Thanks again for your help with approving our request. Best regards, 

# ~ Tanya Renae Compton Project Management-Administration Strat Aero Intemational, Inc. On behalf of Jonalhan E. Adams Executive Vice President Strat Aero Intemational, Inc.

1ON00N NEW YORK HOUStON
§ 2554.41 Can a party request reconsideration of the initial decision? ( a ) Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision with the ALJ within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If the initial decision was served by mail, there is a rebuttable presumption that the initial decision was received by the party 5 days from the date of mailing.
( b ) A motion for reconsideration must be accompanied by a supporting brief and must describe specifically each allegedly erroneous decision.
( c ) Any response to a motion for reconsideration will only be allowed if it is requested by the ALJ.
( d ) The ALJ will dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( e ) If the ALJ issues a revised initial decision upon motion of a party, that party may not file another motion for reconsideration.
##### 



Exhibit 4(i)(T)
 
 Twelfth Amendment to
(110nm) License and (90/70nm) Technical Cooperation Agreement Dated 13
November 2002
  rd
    WHEREAS
 WHEREAS th th
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE
  th
 
  1




---



##### 



th
 th th
 
      st
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 Nanya Technology Corporation
    
    Qimonda AGBy:
    
    /s/ Joseph Hsieh
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Frank PreinName: Joseph Hsieh
Title: Senior Vice President
Date: September 20, 2006
    
    
    
    Name: Frank Prein
Title: Senior Vice President
Date: September 20, 2006
 2




---



##### 



By:
    
    /s/ Klaus FleischmannName: Klaus Fleischmann
Title: Vice PresidentDate: September 18, 2006
 3




---



##### 



Exhibit 8.4.1: Schedules for Development Projects (Key Milestones)
  4




---



##### 



Exhibit 8.4.2 : Pre-development activities to be solely performed by Nanya:
 [***]
 5




---



##### 



Exhibit 8.4.3 : Basic development activities to be solely performed by QAG
  6
§ 286.270 What happens if the Tribe does not satisfy the quarterly reporting requirements? ( a ) If we determine that a Tribe has not submitted to us a complete and accurate Tribal TANF Data Report within the time limit, the Tribe risks the imposition of a penalty at § 286.205 related to the work participation rate targets since the data from the Tribal TANF Data Report is required to calculate participation rates.
( b ) Non-reporting of the Tribal TANF Financial Report may give rise to a penalty under § 286.200 since this Report is used to demonstrate compliance with provisions of the Act, the provisions of 45 CFR part 75, or any Federal statutes and regulations applicable to the TANF program.
[65 FR 8530, Feb. 18, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 3020, Jan. 20, 2016]
Shawn Hauser

WBAY TV 115 S. Jefferson St. Green Bay, WI 54301

I am writing to you in hopes of gainin g an exemption from certain sections under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. I am not going to pretend to know that document inside and out, because I do not. What I can do is make this very simple for all parties. I am a commercial producti on photographer and editor; I make Television Commercials for a modest living...not getting rich but paying the bills. I am seeking the approval and/or ability to use a simple DJI Quadcopter (Drone) to shoot video of certain clients as needed. Examples of use would be car dealers, roofing contractors, implement dealers, and maybe a golf course or two. In my use the drone would never need to rise above 60 feet, would always be in my sight, and again be used to help me get a better angle on certain product w hich helps the final product look as good as possible for our clients. As for safety, the aircraft would be in my line of site 100% of the time it is in the air for me to see what the camera is pointing towards and what type of video I am getting of the pr oduct. I have been flying my own quadcopter for the past 3 months on my personal property to get accustomed to the operation of the drone and feel very comfortable in my ability to operate as I would need for commercial TV production. I am hopeful you wil l see that I am a small dot in the world of drone use, however an approval would greatly improve the product we can produce for our clients, giving us an edge in the competitive field of commercial production here in the Green Bay market. Thank you for you r time and I look forward to hearing a response which will give us a great tool to further our production abilities.

Shawn Hauser WBAY TV Green Bay, WI 54304
#### § 60.22 Immunity.

Individuals, entities or their authorized agents, and the NPDB shall not be held liable in any civil action filed by the subject of a report unless the individual, entity, or authorized agent submitting the report has actual knowledge of the falsity of the information contained in the report.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1656 

To require TARP payments to be conditioned on the top 10 highest wage 

earners at a company having repaid any bonuses received during the 

previous 5 fiscal years. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. GOHMERT, and Mr. DUNCAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require TARP payments to be conditioned on the top 

10 highest wage earners at a company having repaid 

any bonuses received during the previous 5 fiscal years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assisted Institution 

5 Bonus Repayment Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1656 IH

1 SEC. 2. BONUS REPAYMENT REQUIRED FOR TARP ASSIST2 ANCE. 

3 Section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization 

4 Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5221) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(e) BONUS REPAYMENT REQUIREMENT.—Effective 

7 as of the date of the enactment of the Assisted Institution 

8 Bonus Repayment Act of 2009, a financial institution 

9 shall, prior to receiving assistance under this title, certify 

10 to the Secretary that the 10 most highly paid executives 

11 or employees of the institution have repaid to the institu12 tion any bonuses (as such term is defined by the Sec13 retary) received from the institution by such executives or 

14 employees during the previous 5 fiscal years.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
§ 2519.500 How does the Corporation review an application? ( a ) The Corporation will review an application submitted under this part on the basis of the quality, innovation, replicability, and sustainability of the proposed program and such other criteria as the Corporation establishes in an application package.
( b ) In addition, in reviewing applications submitted under this part, the Corporation will take into consideration whether proposed programs— ( 1 ) Demonstrate the commitment of the institution of higher education, other than by demonstrating the commitment of its students, to supporting the community service projects carried out under the program;
( 2 ) Specify how the institution will promote faculty, administration, and staff participation in the community service projects;
( 3 ) Specify the manner in which the institution will provide service to the community through organized programs, including, where appropriate, clinical programs for students in professional schools and colleges;
( 4 ) Describe any higher education partnership that will participate in the community service projects, such as a higher education partnership comprised of the institution, a student organization, a community-based agency, a local government agency, or a nonprofit entity that serves or involves school-age youth, older adults, low-income communities, a department of the institution, or a group of faculty comprised of different departments, schools, or colleges at the institution;
( 5 ) Demonstrate community involvement in the development of the proposal and the extent to which the proposal will contribute to the goals of the involved community members;
( 6 ) Demonstrate a commitment to perform community service projects in underserved urban and rural communities;
( 7 ) Describe research on effective strategies and methods to improve service utilized in the design of the projects;
( 8 ) Specify that the institution will use funds under this part to strengthen the infrastructure in institutions of higher education;
( 9 ) With respect to projects involving delivery of service, specify projects that involve leadership development of school-age youth; or
( 10 ) Describe the needs that the proposed projects are designed to address, such as housing, economic development, infrastructure, health care, job training, education, crime prevention, urban planning, transportation, information technology, or child welfare.
( c ) In addition, the Corporation may designate additional review criteria in an application notice that will be used in selecting programs.
[74 FR 46505, Sept. 10, 2009]
I^^j Fw: Caesars PAC 

'"•^^'^ Christopher Carrell to: Zuzana O Pacious, Kendrick Smith 08/12/2013 08:05 PM 

Zuzana and Kendrick, 

Melissa Laurenza sent me her reply to the Interim Audit Report. It can be viewed below. 

Thanks, 

Christopher Carrell 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

202 694-1360 

— Forwarded by Christopher Carrell/FEC/US on 08/12/2013 08:02 PM — 

From: "Laurenza, Melissa" <mlaurenza@akingump.com> 

To: "'CCanrell@fec.gov"' <CCarrell@fec.gov>. 

Date: 08/12/201310:25 AM 

Subject: Caesars PAC 

Good morning ChriSi 

We will not be submitting an additional response. 

Thank you, 

Melissa 

Melissa L. Laurenza | Senior Political Law Counsel 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER& FELD LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. | Washington, DC 20036-1564 | USA | Direct:+1 202.887.4251 | Intemal: 24251 

Fax: +1 202.887.4288 | mlaurenza@al<inaump.com | ai<inQump.com | Bifi 

IRS Circular 230 Notice Requirement: This communication is not given in the form ofa covered 

opinion, within the meaning of Circular 230 issued by the United States Secretary ofthe 

Treasury. Thus, we are required to inform you that you cannot rely upon any tax advice 

contained in this communication for the purpose of avoiding United States federal tax penalties. 

In addition, any tax advice contained in this communication may not be used to promote, market 

or recommend a transaction to another party. 

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and 

confidential use ofthe recipient(s) named above. Ifyou have received this communication in 

error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
#### § 2490.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. REGINALD DARWIN MORTON, a/k/a Jay, a/k/a Boogie, a/k/a Jason, a/k/a Novacaine , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00024

- J PJ

- 14 )

Submitted : May 25, 2021 Decided: May 28, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Reginald Darwin Morton , Appellant Pro Se. Whitney Demain Pierce , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Darwin Morton appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for

a sentence reduction pursuant to § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 522 2 (2018), and for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act. On appeal, we confine our review to
the iss ues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Morton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 17 7 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response 
Act Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with authority to 
redelegate, the following authorities vested in the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services, under Title III of the Public Health Service (PHS) 
Act and the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and 
Response (PHSBPR) Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-188) as amended hereafter, 
insofar as these authorities pertain to the functions assigned to the 
CDC:
    <bullet> PHS Act, Title III, Section 351A (42 U.S.C. 262a), 
excluding sections (i), (g)(3) and (g)(4) as provided in Sec.  201 of 
the Act; and
    <bullet> PHSBPR Act, Title II, Subtitle C, Section 221 (7 U.S.C. 
8411).
    This delegation excludes the authority to submit reports to the 
Congress, but should be exercised under the Department's existing 
delegation of authority and policy on regulations.
    This delegation is effective upon signature. In addition, I hereby 
affirm and ratify any actions taken by you or your subordinates which 
involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the 
effective day of the delegation.

    Dated: November 8, 2006.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9263 Filed 11-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
Momc*acHiGw/ianmu} 

OAKLAND COUNTY 

P 

OAKLAND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY 

24445 Northwestern Hwy, suite 110 

Southfield, Ml 48075 

EMOCRATIC PARTY 

www.ocdp.org 

Phone: (248) 584-0510 

Email: info@ocdD.ora 

Fox: (248) 584-1020 

Web: www.ocdD.ora 

CHAIRMAN 

Frank Houston 

VICE-CHAIRS 

Melissa Bemardi 

Kelly Garrett 

Gregory Miles 

Tony Grille 

RECORDING SECRETARY 

Kathy Martin 

CORRESPONDING SECRETARY 

Wanda Anderson 

TREASURER 

Phil Reid 

8TH DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE 

Sandy Ritter 

9TH DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE 

Jeremy Mahrle 

llTH DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE 

14TH DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE 

OFFicERis AT LARGE 

Jaron Garza 

Elisa Malile 

John Ranchman 

HySafran 

Maria Willett 

Sergeant-At-Arms 

Jack Schneider 

Parliamentarian 

Murray Gorchow 

Director of Operations 

Amanda Klein. 

'I leave as I arrived, 

•understanding the camplextty 

of the world Into which we" 

ivere born and optimistic that if 

we give it our best shot, we will 

• come close to achieving the 

goal set far us 200years ago.'. 

—The late US. Senator . 

Philip A. Hart 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street NW 

Washington, D.C. 20463 

Dear Mr. Hintermister: 

March 4,2015 

On behalf of the Oakland County Democratic Party and its treasurer 

(collectively "OCDP"), I write to respond to the Interim Audit Report (lAR). 

The OCDP has cooperated fully with the Audit Division since the PEC voted 

to audit the OCDP on November 30,2012. We appreciate the cooperation provided 

by the Audit Division's staff. 

The OCDP has worked in good faith to comply with both state law governing 

its gaming activities and the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). Although the 

OCDP respectfully disagrees with some aspects of the lAR regarding its gaming 

activities, the OCDP will fiilly comply with all the lAR's recommendations without 

admitting to any violations of the FECA. 

The OCDP has already begun the process of complying with all of the lAR's 

recommendations. However, changing the procedures with regard to its gaming 

activities is complex and time-consuming, requiring, among other things, developing 

new procedures and retraining of staff in those procedures. For these reasons, OCDP 

requests until May 1,2015 to complete its implementation of all of the lAR's 

recommendations. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Very truly yours. 

Frank Houston, Chair 

Oakland County Democratic Party 

Paid for by [he Oakland County Democratic Party and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. 

Contributions arc not tax deductible on your federal income tax. Printed in house with donated labor