alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 601.5 Derivative classification. Distinct from “original” classification is the determination that information is in substance the same as information currently classified, because of incorporating, paraphrasing, restating or generating in new form information that is already classified, and marking the newly developed material consistent with the marking of the source information. Persons who only reproduce, extract, or summarize classified information, or who only apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide, need not possess original classification authority. ( a ) If a person who applies derivative classification markings believes that the paraphrasing, restating, or summarizing of classified information has changed the level of or removed the basis for classification, that person must consult for a determination an appropriate official of the originating agency or office of origin who has the authority to upgrade, downgrade, or declassify the information.
( b ) The person who applies derivative classification markings shall observe and respect original classification decisions; and carry forward to any newly created documents any assigned authorized markings. The declassification date or event that provides the longest period of classification shall be used for documents classified on the basis of multiple sources.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_______________________________

Plaintiff

vs. Civil Action No.___________

____________________________________

Defendant

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given this day of , 20 , that

hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from

the judgment of this Court entered on the day of , 20 

in favor of

against said

__________________________________________

 Attorney or Pro Se Litigant

(Pursuant to Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure a notice of appeal in a civil

action must be filed within 30 days after the date of entry of judgment or 60 days if the United

States or officer or agency is a party)

CLERK Please mail copies of the above Notice of Appeal to the following at the addresses

indicated:

Federal Election Commission

1:11-cv-02168-CKK

29th November 13

30th September 13

Defendant

Plaintiffs

non; all parties receive ECF communications.

Combat Veterans For Congress

Political Action Committee

and David H. Wiggs, Treasurer

Plaintiffs Combat Veterans For Congress PAC and David H. Wiggs, Treasurer

/s/ Dan Backer

(AMENDED)

Case 1:11-cv-02168-CKK Document 34 Filed 11/29/13 Page 1 of 1
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0172.08.005.603 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2009 CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 01/21/11 Time: 1:00 am

pm

Company Name: Barton Lexa Water Association ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Darren Carruth Contact Phone Number: (870) 522-1263

General Subject: 2009 DMR Flow Values and Units

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On February 23, 2011 at 1pm I called Barton Lexa Water and explained that I was looking to confirm flow 

values and units reported to 2009 DMR. I was told that the manager was not in currently and to call back the 

next day. 

On February 24, 2011 at 9:24am I called Barton Lexa Water again and was told that Darren Carruth was the 

person to talk to. I was also told that he was out on a call and would get back to me shortly. I gave the 

receptionist my contact information. 

On February 24, 2011 at 10:50am Darren Carruth returned my call and told me that the person doing the 

calculations in 2009 was not performing them accurately. He explained that Outfall 101 is only a 4 inch 

diameter pipe and there is no way that flows of 400 MGD could be discharged from that pipe. He also 

mentioned that 2010 flows are 0.003-0.004 MGD and those values are much more reasonable. Recommend 

changing flows to GPD instead of MGD for 2009.
§ 605.39 Private education. ( a ) A recipient that provides private elementary or secondary education may not, on the basis of handicap, exclude a qualified handicapped person if the person can, with minor adjustments, be provided an appropriate education, as defined in § 605.33(b)(1), within that recipient's program or activity.
( b ) A recipient to which this section applies may not charge more for the provision of an appropriate education to handicapped persons than to nonhandicapped persons except to the extent that any additional charge is justified by a substantial increase in cost to the recipient.
( c ) A recipient to which this section applies that provides special education shall do so in accordance with the provisions of §§ 605.35 and 605.36. Each recipient to which this section applies is subject to the provisions of §§ 605.34, 605.37 and 605.38.
[47 FR 8573, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51381, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### In the Matter of the Petition of the Board of Water Commissioners of the Village of White Plains, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Property. The Westchester County Water Works Company et al., Appellants.

(Submitted October 4, 1009;

decided October 12, 1909.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 195 1ST. T. 502.)
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HCNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION January 3, 1991 

SECOND SESS! 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Friday, July 19, 1991 

PREPA~ED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By (',erald A. Hackett. Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B .. Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Un if icat.ion of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

t.o International carriage by Air. as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amende.d (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. {Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views}. 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Off ice. And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. By 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 250 219 John Schrote. of Oh10. to be an Assistant Jul 17, 91 Mr. Johnston, 

Secretary of the Interior, v1ce Lou Committee on Energy and 

Gallegos, res1gned. Natural Resources, without 

printed reoort. 

*S1gmf1es nommee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
§ 170.406 Attestations. ( a ) *Condition of Certification requirement.* A health IT developer, or its authorized representative that is capable of binding the health IT developer, must provide the Secretary an attestation of compliance with the following Conditions and Maintenance of Certification requirements: ( 1 ) Section 170.401;
( 2 ) Section 170.402, but only for § 170.402(a)(4) and (b)(2) if the health IT developer certified a Health IT Module(s) that is part of a health IT product which can store electronic health information;
( 3 ) Section 170.403;
( 4 ) Section 170.404 if the health IT developer has a Health IT Module(s) certified to any of the certification criteria adopted in § 170.315(g)(7) through (10); and such health IT developer must also ensure that health IT allows for health information to be exchanged, accessed, and used, in the manner described in § 170.404; and
( 5 ) Section 170.405 if a health IT developer has a Health IT Module(s) certified to any one or more ONC Certification Criteria for Health IT in § 170.315(b), (c)(1) through (3), (e)(1), (f), (g)(7) through (10), and (h).
( b ) *Maintenance of Certification requirement.* ( 1 ) A health IT developer, or its authorized representative that is capable of binding the health IT developer, must provide the attestation specified in paragraph (a) of this section semiannually for any Health IT Modules that have or have had an active certification at any time under the ONC Health IT Certification Program during the prior six months.
( 2 ) [Reserved] [85 FR 25945, May 1, 2020, as amended at 89 FR 8549, Feb. 8, 2024]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1002]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5125-N-10]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: March 1, 2007.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 07-1002 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
§ 618.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 618.300 through 618.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 618.300 through 618.310.
§ 618.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
**Exhibit 32.0**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Scout Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:				1.    The annual report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.				Date: December 19, 2007				By: _/s/ John Roozendaal______________				Name:  John Roozendaal				Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Principal Accounting Officer of Scout Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:				1.    The annual report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.				Date: December 19, 2007				By: _/s/ Jason Walsh______________________				Name:  Jason Walsh				Title: Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

----
TRUDEAU INSTITUTE .. (~;:-

.._' ,I _'

_ "'; " .. t ,;

IMPROVING HEAlTH THROUGH MEDICAl RESEARCH

Ronald H. Goldfarb, Ph.D.

PRE9DENT. O:RECTOO AND ChlEF EXECUThIE OFFfCER

October 21, 2013

Mr. Robert Bevilacqua, Supervisor

Town of Harrietstown

Harrietstown Town Hall

39 Main Street

Saranac Lake, NY 12983

Dear Mr. Bevilacqua:

It has come to my attention that there is a possibility of an RFP related to the DOT for a

subsidized round-trip route being added between the Adirondack Regional Airport in

Lake Clear and the Westchester County Airport in White Plains, NY andlor LGA

depending on weather. On behalf of the Trudeau Institute employees, board members and

visitors from the New York City region, I would like to relay a very sincere interest in

this flight materializing as it would be of high value to Trudeau employees as well as

guests and board members.

Flights between the New York metropolitan area and our local airport would save a

tremendous amount of time, spare individuals from driving on sometimes dangerous

winter roads, and open the door to more scientific collaboration due to the ease in

scheduling trips to and from our region.

If there is anything further r can do to rigorously support this option, please do not

hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

e::« k G~~~

Ronald H. Goldfarb, Ph.D.

cc: Board of Supervisors, Town of Harrietstown

Lawrence L. Johnson, Chief Operating Officer

rgoidforb@trudeouinstitvte.org

518-891·3080 I Trudeau Institute

fax 518·891·5126 154 Algonquin Avenue

www.trudeauinstitute.org Saronac Lake. NY 12983
RECEIVED ^ 

„r^rr"-n FEC MAIL CENTER 

ccncDM FPTIUTRECHT 8B PHILLIPS, PLLC ^ 

FEDERAL ELECTIuff ' 7ninAlJG3 PM 3^ U 

COMMISSION ATTORNEYS AT LAW £U!0 RUO o i r 11 o 

i V^^lnii in. ci 1900 M STREET, N.W. imWSR AHI0:5U SUITE 500 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20036 

OFFICE OF GENERAL 

COUNSEL (202) 778-4000 

FACSIMILE (202) 842-5825 

www.up-law.com 

August 31,2010 

Joseph F. Stoitz 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

.Re: Response to the Interim Audit Report on Hillary Clinton for President 

Dear Mr. Stoltz: 

This is the response of Hillary Clinton for President (hereinafter the "Committee") to the Interim 

Audit Report (hereinafter "lAR" pr "Report") of the Audit Division. Pursuant to that report, the Audit 

staff recommended that the Committee provide any necessary comments. 

As noted iu the LAR, the Committee raised $252,726,143 in connection with the 2008 presidential 

primary campaign. Of that amount, and after a complete and thorough review, the Audit staff questioned 

$21,400 in PAC or political committee contributions, or, .008% of the Committee's total receipts. The 

Committee welcomes the opportunity to comment on the tiny amount of contributions noted. 

The $21,400 in contributions noted were subject to three minor database errors and, consequently, 

were inadvertently overlooked by the Committee. Of this amount, $1,700 was mistakenly designated to 

the primary, when it should have been designated to the general, $7,900 was mistakenly coded as coming 

from a qualified multi-candidate committee, when that committee had not yet qualified, and the remainder 

were general election contributions that inadvertently were overlooked when the Committee refunded its 

general election contributions, due to a computer programming gliich. When these were brought to the 

Committee's attention, the Committee took appropriate steps to return the funds, as the Audit staff noted. 

No further action is being required. 

The Committee devoted significant resources to its compliance program, and the Compliance 

staff worked exceedingly hard to prevent errors prior to their occurrence. Despite the very minor errors 

explained above, we believe that this is reflected in the lAR, and hope that the public record also will 

reflect this accomplishment. 

Sincerely, 

Eric Kleinfeld ^ Lyn Utrecht
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 5 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 5

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
   approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2023

Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
Cornyn, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Grassley, 
Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Risch, Mr. Scott of Florida, 
Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Thune, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Vance, Mr. Young, Mr. Scott of 
 South Carolina, Mr. Romney, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Kennedy, 
 Ms. Ernst, and Mrs. Britt) introduced the following joint resolution; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
   approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-
640), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia on November 
21, 2022, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of 
the District of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 10, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1638 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities or locations in Virginia or to house 

such individuals at such facilities or locations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Mr. FORBES (for himself, Mr. WOLF, Mr. CANTOR, and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained 

at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities 

or locations in Virginia or to house such individuals 

at such facilities or locations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER 

4 INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT NAVAL STATION, 

5 GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FACILITIES OR 

6 LOCATIONS IN VIRGINIA. 

7 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 

8 available to any Federal department or agency may be 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1638 IH

1 used to transfer any individual detained by the United 

2 States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to any 

3 facility or location in Virginia or to house any such indi4 vidual at such a facility or location. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DAVE LEVINTHAL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 15-1624 (APM)

DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMMISSION’S 

STATEMENT OF GENUINE ISSUES

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) and Local Civil Rule 7(h)(1), the 

Federal Election Commission submits the following statement of genuine issues in response to 

plaintiffs’ Statement of Material Facts As To Which There Is No Genuine Issue (ECF No. 14-1). 

The Commission specifically addresses each numbered paragraph from Plaintiffs’ Statement 

below:

1. Admitted.

2. Admitted.

3. Denied. The cited evidence in fact supports the opposite conclusion. The 

Commission further objects that the sentence states an irrelevant and immaterial legal conclusion 

that appears to be premised on plaintiffs’ misunderstanding or disregard of relevant authority 

explaining the scope of FOIA Exemption 7(E). (See FEC Summ. J. Br. at 13; FEC Reply & 

Opp’n at 4-6.) 

4. Denied. This sentence is not supported by any record evidence, and in fact 

purports to cite as support portions of the Commission’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion 

Case 1:15-cv-01624-APM Document 16-1 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 3
2

for Summary Judgment that directly and affirmatively contradict this assertion. The cited 

portions of Commission’s opening summary judgment brief explain that, after conducting lineby-line examinations of the NIST Study in an effort to identify any reasonably segregable, 

nonprivileged, nonexempt portions of the NIST Study that could be released, the Commission 

concluded that no portion of the NIST Study could be segregated and disclosed. (See FEC 

Summ. J. Br. at 18-20, 23-24; see also FEC Reply & Opp’n at 7-9; Palmer Decl. ¶¶ 25-28; Kahn 

Decl. ¶ 12.) Moreover, the Commission objects that this sentence states a legal conclusion. 

Dated: April 28, 2016

Washington, DC

Respectfully submitted,

CHANNING D. PHILLIPS, D.C. Bar #415793

United States Attorney

DANIEL F. VAN HORN, D.C. Bar #924092

Chief, Civil Division

By:

WYNNE P. KELLY

Assistant United States Attorney

555 4th Street, NW

Washington, DC 20530 

(202) 252-2545

wynne.kelly@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the FEC

Of Counsel:

Daniel A. Petalas (D.C. Bar No. 467908)

Acting General Counsel

dpetalas@fec.gov

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628)

Deputy General Counsel — Law

lstevenson@fec.gov

Case 1:15-cv-01624-APM Document 16-1 Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 3
3

Kevin Deeley

Acting Associate General Counsel

kdeeley@fec.gov

Erin Chlopak (D.C. Bar No. 496370)

Acting Assistant General Counsel

echlopak@fec.gov

Tanya Senanayake (D.C. Bar No. 1006218)

Attorney

tsenanayake@fec.gov

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

999 E Street NW

Washington, DC 20463

(202) 694-1650

Case 1:15-cv-01624-APM Document 16-1 Filed 04/28/16 Page 3 of 3
#### § 400.44 Restriction.

An applicant for asylum is not eligible for assistance under title IV of the Act unless otherwise provided by Federal law.

[51 FR 3915, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 65 FR 15443, Mar. 22, 2000]