alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 672.5 Filing and service of rulings, orders, and decisions. ( a ) All rulings, orders, decisions, and other documents issued by the Presiding Officer shall be filed with the Hearing Clerk. Copies of all such documents shall be served personally, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, upon all parties.
( b ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed in these rules, except as otherwise provided, computation is by calendar days and does not include the day of the event from which the designated period begins to run. When a stated time expires on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the stated time period shall be extended to include the next business day.
( c ) *Extensions of time.* The Presiding Officer may grant an extension of time for the filing of any pleading, document, or motion ( 1 ) upon timely motion of a party to the proceeding, for good cause shown, and after consideration of prejudice to other parties, or
( 2 ) upon his own motion. Such a motion by a party may only be made after notice to all other parties, unless the movant can show good cause why serving notice is impracticable. The motion shall be filed in advance of the date on which the pleading, document or motion is due to be filed, unless the failure of a party to make timely motion for extension of time was the result of excusable neglect.
( d ) *Service by mail.* Service of the complaint is complete when the return receipt is signed. Service of all other pleadings and documents is complete upon mailing. Where a pleading or document is served by mail, five (5) days shall be added to the time allowed by these rules for the filing of a responsive pleading or document.
( e ) *Ex parte discussion of proceeding.* At no time after the issuance of the complaint shall the Presiding Officer, or any other person who is likely to advise these officials in the decision on the case, discuss ex parte the merits of the proceeding with any interested person outside the Agency, with any Agency staff member who performs a prosecutorial or investigative function in the proceeding or other factually related proceeding, or with any representative of such person. Any ex parte memorandum or other communication addressed to the Presiding Officer during the pendency of the proceeding and relating to the merits thereof, by or on behalf of any party, shall be regarded as argument made in the proceeding and shall be served upon all other parties. The Presiding Officer shall give the other parties an opportunity to reply.
( f ) Subject to the provisions of law restricting the public disclosure of confidential information, any person may, during Agency business hours, inspect and copy any document filed in any proceeding. Such documents shall be made available by the Hearing Clerk.
( g ) The person seeking copies of any documents filed in a proceeding shall bear the cost of duplication. Upon a formal request the Agency may waive this cost in appropriate cases.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9925]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Delaware & Leigh National Heritage Corridor Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Interior.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware and 
Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

Meeting Date and Time: Friday, January 12, 2006-1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Address: Emrick Technology Center, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton, 
PA 18042.

    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to 
assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions 
in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and 
promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission 
reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100- , November 18, 
1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, 
Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 2750 Hugh 
Moore Park Road, Easton PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

    Dated: December 22, 2006.
C. Allen Sachse,
Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9925 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 75236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9702]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 9000-0094]

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Debarment 
and Suspension

AGENCIES:  Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION:  Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension 
to an existing OMB clearance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a currently 
approved information collection requirement concerning debarment and 
suspension. The OMB clearance expires March 31, 2007.

DATES:  Submit comments on or before February 12, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding this burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for 
reducing this burden to the General Services Administration, FAR 
Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405. 
Please cite OMB Control No.9000-0094, Debarment and Suspension, in all 
correspondence.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Clark, Contract Policy 
Division, GSA (202) 219-1813.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The FAR requires contracts to be awarded to only those contractors 
determined to be responsible. Instances where a firm or its principals 
have been indicted, convicted, suspended, proposed for debarment, 
debarred, or had a contract terminated for default are critical factors 
to be considered by the contracting officer in making a responsibility 
determination. This certification requires the disclosure of this 
information.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 89,995.
    Responses per respondent: 12.223.
    Total Responses: 1,100,000.
    Hours Per Response: 0.0833 hrs.
    Total Burden Hours: 91,667.
    Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the 
information collection documents from the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (VIR), Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405, 
telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0094, 
Debarment and Suspension, in all correspondence.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
Ralph De Stefano,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9702 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
```
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 21 st ) 

Century Democrats (Al 1 -25) ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on February 06,2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the 21^* 

Century Democrats (A11-2S), as recommended in the Memorandum from the 

Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated January 31,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

A}MI/WI,^J^X 

^ DatqTI ' Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Exhibit 10.2


 


FIVE STAR SENIOR LIVING INC.


 


Summary of Director Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation
of the Directors of Five Star Senior Living Inc. (the “Company”) for services as Directors, which is subject to modification
at any time by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:


 


		·	Each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $75,000 for services as a Director. The annual fee for any new Independent
Director is prorated for the initial year.



 


		·	Each Independent Director who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Quality of Care Committee,
Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $22,500, $22,500, $12,500 and
$12,500, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new committee chair is prorated for the initial year.



 


		·	The Lead Independent Director receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $17,500 for serving in this role.



 


		·	Each Director receives a grant of 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of the first Board meeting following
each annual meeting of stockholders (or, for Directors who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first
Board meeting attended).



 


		·	The Company generally reimburses all Directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors and
for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
#### Board of Education of Tennille *v.*Kelley.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where a suit has been dismissed by the plaintiff, in order to bring a second suit for the same cause of action the plaintiff must pay the costs, or file a pauper affidavit stating his inability to do so. A failure in this regard furnishes ground for a plea in abatement. Civil Code, §5043; *Langston*v. *Marks,*68 *Ga.*435; *Sweeney*v. *Malloy,*107 *Ga. 83; Johnson*v. *Central Ry. Co.,*119 *Ga.*185; *Wright*v. *Jett,*120 *Ga.*995.

2. That the clerk of the superior court, on request of counsel for the plaintiff, charged the cost to such counsel, and released the plaintiff, stating that he also “had authority to collect for the sheriff as well as himself,” would not suffice. This was not an actual payment of the cost, at least *480as to the sheriff; nor did it appear that the clerk in fact had authority, as to the cost due the sheriff, to release the plaintiff and charge it to-the attorney. Authority to collect for the sheriff did not include authority to release the plaintiff and charge the cost to another.

Argued June 7,

Decided August 13, 1906.

Rehearing denied August 17, 1906.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Parker. Wáshington superior court. November 25, 1905.

*G. H. Howard*and *E. W. Jordan,*for plaintiff in error,

*Evans & Evans,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Pish,*0, *J,, absent, and Evans, J., disqualified.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies Cancer Research Hospital, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On November 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

Employees of the Department of Energy predecessor agencies and their contractors or subcontractors who were monitored or should have been monitored while working at the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies Cancer Research Hospital from May 15, 1950, through December 31, 1963, and who were employed for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the SEC.

                        This designation became effective on December 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.s.C. 7384*1*                        (14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 9, 2006, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard, M.D.

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 06-9875 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6410

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDDIE PALMER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-93-90, CA-97-428-N) Submitted: October 30, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Palmer , Nos. CR-93-90; CA-97-428-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 78468)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 2006, a pursuant to Section 6(a) of the national Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual instruments foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, California Instruments, San Diego, CA; and Data Translation, Inc., Marlboro, MA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Racial Instruments has changed its name to EADS-NA Defense Test and Services, Inc., Irving, CA.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 30, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 17, 2006 (71 FR 19751).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-9930 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2017

No. 04

- 15

- 00313

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

James Bu rke JARREAU (Cross Appellant),

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5552

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On March 27 , 201 7 , the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued the mandate in this

appeal in which it reversed our decision and remanded the matter to this court. State v. Jarreau

, 512 S.W.3d 352, 356 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017). Specifically, the court held the indictment

provided appellee with sufficient notice to allow him “to investi g a t e the allegations against him

and establish a defense.” The court stated that on remand, we are to consider “the State’s

remaining points of er ror.” Id. at 356

– 57

. Accordingly, we ORDER that the parties may file

supplemental briefs in this court in light of the decision by the Texas Court of Criminals, and we

note that such briefs are encouraged in this matter.

We ORDER the State to file it s supplemental brief, if any, in this court on or before

August 23, 2017

. Appell ee ’s supplemental brief, if any, will be due in this court thirty days after

the date the State’s supplemental brief is filed. If either party chooses not to file a supplemental

brief, that party is ORDERED to notify this court of such fact in writing on or before August 3,

2017 . If the State decides not to file a supplemental brief, appell ee may still file a supplemental

brief, and such brief will be due thirty days after the date the State advises this court in writing

that it does not intend to file a supplemental brief.

We order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on all counsel._________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of July, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
§ 2556.330 When may a VISTA be provided coverage for legal defense expenses related to criminal proceedings? ( a ) For the legal defense of a VISTA member who is charged with a criminal offense related to the VISTA member's service, up to and including arraignment in Federal, State, and local criminal proceedings, AmeriCorps may pay actual and reasonable legal expenses. AmeriCorps is not required to pay any expenses for the legal defense of a VISTA member where they are charged with a criminal offense arising from alleged activity or action that is unrelated to that VISTA's service.
( b ) A VISTA member's service is clearly unrelated to a charged offense when: ( 1 ) The activity or action is alleged to have occurred prior to the VISTA member's VISTA service.
( 2 ) The VISTA member is not at their assigned project location, such as during periods of approved leave, medical leave, emergency leave, or in administrative hold status in the VISTA program.
( 3 ) The activity or action is alleged to have occurred at or near their assigned project, but is clearly not part of, or required by, the VISTA member's service assignment.
( c ) For the legal defense, beyond arraignment in Federal, State, and local criminal proceedings, of a VISTA member who is charged with a criminal offense, AmeriCorps may also pay actual and reasonable legal expenses when: ( 1 ) The charged offense against the VISTA member relates exclusively to their VISTA assignment or status as a VISTA member;
( 2 ) The charged offense against the VISTA member arises from an alleged activity or action that is a part of, or required by, the VISTA member's VISTA assignment;
( 3 ) The VISTA member has not admitted a willful or knowing violation of law; or
( 4 ) The charged offense against the VISTA member is not a minor offense or misdemeanor, such as a minor vehicle violation.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, there may be situations in which the criminal proceedings at issue arise from a matter that also gives rise to a civil claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In such a situation, the U.S. Department of Justice may, on behalf of the United States, agree to defend the VISTA. If the U.S. Department of Justice agrees to defend the VISTA member, unless there is a conflict between the VISTA member's interest and that of the United States, AmeriCorps will not pay for expenses associated with any additional legal representation (such as counsel fees for private counsel) for the VISTA member.
#### § 2301.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.