alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-923 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MALAWI 

Signed at Lilongwe September 23, 2003 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MALAWI 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Lilongwe September 23, 2003; 

 Entered into force September 23, 2003.
#### Duster *v.*Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

July 15, 1914:

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This case presents only the same questions which were considered in the case of Carson N. Reed v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 83, and for the reasons there stated the judgment is affirmed.
Weed of the Week 

Cutleaf Blackberry 

Rubus laciniatus Willd. 

 

Common Names: cutleaf blackberry, evergreen 

blackberry, cutleaf bramble, laciniate bramble, 

parsley-leaf bramble 

Native Origin: Europe 

Description: An erect, spreading evergreen shrub 

in the rose family (Rosaceae) growing 2 – 6 feet in 

height. Stems are erect when young, but arch to 

touch the ground as they grow and root at the nodes. Stems are heavily ribbed, purplish-red and are usually 

prickly or bristly. New stems (canes) are produced each year and usually die after flowering and fruiting in the 

second year. Leaves are alternate and palmately compound with 3 to 5 highly lacerated leaflets. The leaves 

are green to greenish-red above and paler below and armed with prickles. The white flowers appear from late 

spring to early summer. Flowers are about 1 inch across, borne in clusters, and are monoecious (male and 

female parts on the same flower). Juicy, edible, black berries about 1 inch long are produced in tight clusters. 

Plants reproduce by seed and stems rooting when in contact with the soil. 

Habitat: It is found in woodland edges, fence rows, and clearings. It 

requires full sun and dry soil. 

Distribution: This species is reported from states shaded on Plants 

Database map. It is reported invasive in CA, IN, NJ, OR, PA, WA, and WV. 

Ecological Impacts: This aggressive shrub forms dense prickly thickets 

or brambles that take up large amounts of space and the prickles also 

cause movement through an area difficult. This plant has become a 

serious weed in sunny natural ecosystems. 

Control and Management: Decline will occur in forested areas as the forest develops and shade increases. 

• Manual- Mow several times a year; burn sites. 

• Also-Goats will readily eat young or new blackberry/raspberry canes—when they are 

still soft and green. Mowing a patch down, then putting goats on the new vegetation will 

speed up the effects of mowing alone. 

• Chemical- It can be effectively controlled using any of several readily available general 

use herbicides such as glyphosate, metsulfuron-methyl, or triclopyr. Follow label and 

state requirements. 

• Biological Control- Phragmidium violaceum, a rust fungus, has been introduced as a 

biological control agent for invasive blackberries in Australia, New Zealand, and Chile. A 

rust disease has recently caused dieback on plants of blackberry and raspberry (Rubus 

spp.) in Oregon. 

References: www.forestimages.org, http://plants.usda.gov, www.nps.gov/plants/alien/list/a.htm 

Czarapata, Elizabeth J. Invasive Plants of the Upper Midwest, an Illustrated Guide to their Identification and 

Control, 2005 p. 159-160, http://www.cnr.vt.edu/DENDRO/dendrology/syllabus/factsheet.cfm?ID=251 

www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/Publications.htm?seq_no_115=183749 

Produced by the USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Staff, Newtown Square, PA. WOW 2-19-07 

Invasive Plants website: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/fhp/invasive_plants
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00441

- CV

RIO GRANDE H2O GUARDIAN and Albert Furney Muller, Jr.,

Appellant s

v.

ROBERT MULLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD , DBA Robert Muller LTD and Rosetta

Stone, LLC,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20 13CVQ001860D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 286.150 Can a family, with a child under age 6, be penalized because a parent refuses to work because (s)he cannot find child care? ( a ) If the individual is a single custodial parent caring for a child under age six, the Tribe may not reduce or terminate assistance based on the parent's refusal to engage in required work if he or she demonstrates an inability to obtain needed child care for one or more of the following reasons: ( 1 ) Appropriate child care within a reasonable distance from the home or work site is unavailable;
( 2 ) Informal child care by a relative or under other arrangements is unavailable or unsuitable; or
( 3 ) Appropriate and affordable formal child care arrangements are unavailable.
( b ) Refusal to work when an acceptable form of child care is available is not protected from sanctioning.
( c ) The Tribe will determine when the individual has demonstrated that he or she cannot find child care, in accordance with criteria established by the Tribe. These criteria must: ( 1 ) Address the procedures that the Tribe uses to determine if the parent has a demonstrated inability to obtain needed child care;
( 2 ) Include definitions of the terms “appropriate child care,” “reasonable distance,” “unsuitability of informal care,” and “affordable child care arrangements”; and
( 3 ) Be submitted to us.
( d ) The Tribal TANF agency must inform parents about: ( 1 ) The penalty exception to the Tribal TANF work requirement, including the criteria and applicable definitions for determining whether an individual has demonstrated an inability to obtain needed child care;
( 2 ) The Tribe's procedures (including definitions) for determining a family's inability to obtain needed child care, and any other requirements or procedures, such as fair hearings, associated with this provision; and
( 3 ) The fact that the exception does not extend the time limit for receiving Federal assistance.
#### § 1630.8 Contributions.

Any contributions or gifts of LSC funds to another organization or to an individual are prohibited.
MEMORANDUM 

TO: Portland Cement NSPS Docket 

FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG 

DATE: October 31, 2008 

SUBJECT: October 31, 2008 Meeting by teleconference between US Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) and representatives of Lafarge North America Inc. 

Meeting Participants 

Keith Barnett, USEPA 

Elineth Torres, USEPA 

Steve Fruh, USEPA 

Mike Laney, RTI (contractor to EPA) 

Steve Kohl, Warner, Norcross and Judd LLP (Outside counsel to Lafarge) 

Mike Pelan, Lafarge North America Inc. 

Bill Voshell, Lafarge North America, Inc. 

Craig Campbell, Lafarge North America Inc. 

Information discussed in the Meeting 

This meeting was to discuss concerns raised by Lafarge on the proposed amendments to the 

NSPS for Portland cement Manufacturing. Comments made by Lafarge in the meeting 

included: 

• Lafarge noted that low volatile fuels will not create as many the C-H radicals as high 

volatile fuels. This increases NOx emissions. 

• Lafarge has an internal burnability index. The Davenport Iowa kiln is an example of 

a hard burning mix. NOx emissions from this kiln are 4.0 lb/ton clinker. 

• Lafarge suggested we look at the NOx BACT determination for the Holcim plant at 

St. Genevieve. 

• Lafarge noted that their Caldera, Alabama kiln emits NOx at a level of 1.5 to 2.7 

lb/ton clinker, but their Sugar Creek, Missouri emits at 3.0 to 4.5 lb/ton clinker. Both 

kilns are preheater/precalciners and are the same age. 

• The guarantee by FL Smidth for a new Joppa kiln with SNCR was 2.0 lb/ton clinker. 

• They provided data for guarantees for their world-wide kilns. Uncontrolled NOx 

emissions range from 2.0 to 5.0 lb/ton clinker. 

• NOx emissions from long kilns range from 4.0 to 25 lb/ton clinker. 

• If you modify a cement kiln you will trip PSD.
#### § 2522.455 How do I find out about additional priorities governing the selection process?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034, May 28, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615, Aug. 16, 2024.

The Corporation posts discretionary funding opportunities addressing the Corporation's selection preferences and additional requirements on our website at *www.nationalservice.gov* and at *www.grants.gov* in advance of grant competitions

[70 FR 39600, July 8, 2005]
QUESTION 1: Do states that now collect manifests make individual manifests available 

at public request, or are there restrictions on access? How long after hazardous waste 

shipments are completed does it typically take the state to make such manifests available 

to requestors?

QUESTION 2: Do states that now collect manifests make aggregated data from

manifests, multiple manifests, or data reports freely available to the public upon request? 

(Examples would be a request for all manifests with a particular waste code or all 

manifests going to or managed by a particular company or facility.) Have states 

imposed any CBI related limitations on the information they will disclose in response to 

such requests? How long after hazardous waste shipments are completed does it 

typically take the state to provide aggregate data in response to such a request?

QUESTION 3: In a survey conducted for ASTSWMO by Liz Bols (MI DEQ) in 

January, 2007, nine States provided responses to questions related to manifests and a 

future electronic manifest system. The States that responded were NY, OR, SC, FL, MI, 

WA, CT, ID, and OH. Of these nine states, eight states responded that manifest data 

would probably not be subject to CBI under state laws and policies, while Ohio indicated 

that manifest data might be subject to CBI claims based on the experience in Ohio with

Ohio’s Hazardous Waste Annual Report. In addition, several states on the e-Manifest 

rule workgroup, including MD, PA, NJ, and CA, stated that they would also release their 

HW manifests as public information without allowing CBI claims.

However, in August, 2004, Paula Canter of the Ohio EPA polled the States on their Site 

ID, manifest tracking, and Hazardous Waste Reporting requirements. As part of the 2004 

survey, 44 States responded to the question “Do you allow CBI claims on the Hazardous 

Waste Report?” The responses to this question in 2004 from the 44 respondents was 

evenly split between states that would allowed and states that would not allow CBI 

claims for their HW Report data. 

Given that the request for aggregate manifest data may be viewed as presenting many of 

the same data and issues as requests for a state’s HW Report data insofar as the disclosure 

of customer list information, how should we reconcile the answers given in response to 

the 2004 and 2007 surveys? Should aggregate manifest requests and requests for HW 

Annual Report data be treated differently for purposes of CBI claims?

QUESTION 4: Do you think that your state’s current policy on public disclosure of 

information of the type described in Question 2 would be at all affected by the fact that 

an electronic manifest system may make information available more rapidly than it is 

available under the current paper system?
Exhibit 4.16

 

AMENDMENT TO
 BYLAWS
 OF
  HEAD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY

 

Dated November 26, 2002

 

Article II, Section 2 of the Bylaws of Head Distributing Company is hereby amended to read as follows:

 

2.2          Annual Meetings.  The Corporation shall hold an annual meeting of shareholders at 10:00 a.m. on the first Tuesday in October of each year or at such other time as shall be determined by the Board of Directors, to elect directors and to transact any business that properly may come before the meeting. If the day fixed for the annual meeting is a legal holiday, such meeting shall be held on the next succeeding business day. The annual meeting may be combined with any other meeting of shareholders, whether annual or special.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Spike Maynard for 

Congress (All-02) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Conmiission, do hereby certify that on January 12, 2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Spike Maynard for Congress (Al 1-02) as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated 

December 28,2011. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

mmis! 

)a|e Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Coihmission
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7429

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHAWN DAVON SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:15-cr-00041-CCE-1; 1:16-cv-00652-CCE-LPA)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Davon Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Davon Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adolescent LiteratureBooksChildrens LiteratureCulturally Relevant EducationEducational StrategiesElementary Secondary EducationMexican American EducationMexican American LiteratureMexican AmericansReading Material SelectionReading MaterialsReading Motivation

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### § 261.1 What does this part cover?

This part includes the regulatory provisions relating to the mandatory work requirements of TANF and State work participation data verification requirements.

[71 FR 37475, June 29, 2006]
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tsippy Moldovan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Tsippy Moldovan
Tsippy Moldovan
Chief Financial Officer
November 18, 2008
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6,1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, June 23, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR EX.RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

- CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* 15 22 Gary S. Guzy, of the District of Columbia, to be Mar 17, 99 Reported by Mr. 

an Assistant Administrator ofthe Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice Environment and Public Works, 

Jonathan Z. Cannon, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 35 3-8 Diane Edith Watson, of California, to be Apr 14, 99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Plenipotentiary ofthe United States of without printed report. 

America to the Federal States of Micronesia. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

* 59 1-5 Kenneth M. Bresnahan, ofVirginia, to be Chief Apr 30, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Financial Officer, Department ofLabor, vice Jeffords, Committee on Health, 

Edmundo A. Gonzales, resigned. Education, Labor, and Pensions, 

without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 70 4-4 Carolyn L. Huntoon, of Virginia, to be an Mar 25, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Assistant Secretary of Energy (Environmental Murkowski, Committee on 

Management), vice Alan L. Alm, resigned. Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

May 10, 99 Senate Committee on 

Armed Services discharged. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 71 108 George T. Frampton, Jr., of the District of May 12, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Columbia, to be a Member of the Council on Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Quality, vice Kathleen A. Environment and Public Works, 

McGinty, resigned. without printed report. 

* 75 18 John T. Spotila, of New Jersey, to be May 20, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Administrator of the Office oflnformation and Thompson, Committee on 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Governmental Affairs, without 

Budget, vice Sally Katzen. printed report. 

I 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED - No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 95 341 Lawrence H. Summers, of Maryland, to be Jun 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Robert E. Committee on Finance, without 

Rubin. printed report. 

! 

~ 

' 

i 

I 

I 

'I 

I 

I 

' : 

! 

! 

I 

; 

* Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testz[y before any dul."'r' constztuted commzttee of the Senate 
5 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
§ 260.58 What penalty relief is available to a State whose failure to meet the work participation rates is attributable to providing federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers? ( a ) ( 1 ) We will determine that a State has reasonable cause if its failure to meet the work participation rates was attributable to federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers granted to victims of domestic violence.
( 2 ) To receive reasonable cause under the provisions of § 262.5(b) of this chapter, the State must provide evidence that it achieved the applicable rates, except with respect to any individuals who received a federally recognized good cause domestic violence waiver of work participation requirements. In other words, it must demonstrate that it met the applicable rates when such waiver cases are removed from the calculations at §§ 261.22(b) and 261.24(b) of this chapter.
( b ) ( 1 ) We will reduce a State's penalty based on the degree of noncompliance to the extent that its failure to meet the work participation rates was attributable to federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers.
( 2 ) To receive a reduction based on degree of noncompliance under the provisions of § 261.51 of this chapter, a State granting federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers of work participation requirements must demonstrate that it achieved participation rates above the threshold at § 261.51(b)(3) of this chapter, when such waiver cases are removed from the calculations at §§ 261.22(b) and 261.24(b) of this chapter.
( c ) We may take federally recognized good cause domestic violence waivers of work requirements into consideration in deciding whether a State has achieved compliance or made significant progress towards achieving compliance in meeting the work participation rates during a corrective compliance period.
( d ) To receive the penalty relief specified in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the State must submit the information specified at § 265.9(b)(5) of this chapter.
§ 310.0 What does this part cover? This part addresses conditions for funding and requirements governing Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems and Office Automation including: ( a ) The automated systems options for comprehensive Tribal IV-D programs in § 310.5 of this part;
( b ) The functional requirements for the Model Tribal IV-D Systems in § 310.10 of this part;
( c ) The security and privacy requirements for Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems and Office Automation in § 310.15 of this part;
( d ) The conditions for funding the installation, operation, maintenance, and enhancement of Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems and Office Automation in § 310.20 of this part;
( e ) The conditions that apply to acquisitions of Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems in § 310.25 of this part; and
( f ) The accountability and monitoring of Computerized Tribal IV-D Systems in § 310.40 of this part.