alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Cosmetic Center, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 26, 1998. 

                    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a                           ( print page 597)                        lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Impax Laboratories, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2004.                 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Phoenix Waste Services Company, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended October 31, 2002. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Telynx, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended October 31, 2004. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. 

*Therefore, it is ordered*, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. est on December 29, 2006, through 11:59 p.m. est on January 16, 2007.                 

By the Commission. 

Nancy M. Morris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9986 Filed 12-29-06; 11:32 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 2553.25 What are a sponsor's administrative responsibilities? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
A sponsor shall: ( a ) Assume full responsibility for securing maximum and continuing community financial and in-kind support to operate the project successfully.
( b ) Provide levels of staffing and resources appropriate to accomplish the purposes of the project and carry out its project management responsibilities.
( c ) Employ a full-time project director to accomplish project objectives and manage the functions and activities delegate to project staff for Senior Corps project(s) within its control. The project director may participate in activities to coordinate project resources with those of related local agencies, boards or organizations. A full-time project director shall not serve concurrently in another capacity, paid or unpaid, during established working hours. A sponsor may negotiate the employment of a part-time project director with CNCS when the sponsor can demonstrate that such an arrangement will not adversely affect the size, scope or quality of project operations.
( d ) Consider all project staff as sponsor employees subject to its personnel policies and procedures.
( e ) Compensate project staff at a level that is comparable to similar staff positions in the sponsor organization and/or project service area, as is practicable.
( f ) Establish risk management policies and procedures covering RSVP project activities. This includes provision of appropriate insurance coverage for RSVP volunteers, which includes; accident insurance, personal liability insurance, and excess automobile liability insurance.
( g ) Establish record keeping and reporting systems in compliance with CNCS requirements that ensure quality of program and fiscal operations, facilitate timely and accurate submission of required reports and cooperate with CNCS evaluation and data collection efforts.
( h ) Comply with, and ensure that all volunteer stations comply with, all applicable civil rights laws and regulations, including non-discrimination based on disability.
( i ) Conduct National Service Criminal History Checks in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR 2540.200 through 2540.207.
[64 FR 14135, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 46509, Sept. 10, 2009; 83 FR 64655, Dec. 17, 2018]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7789
DONNA MARIE ZAHID, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA HUFFMAN; D. PARRISH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-2-1035-7) Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donna Marie Zahid, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donna Marie Zahid appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zahid v. Huffman , No. CA2-1035-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 2556.405 Who has sole authority to remove a VISTA from a VISTA project and who has sole authority to terminate a VISTA from a VISTA project or the VISTA program? ( a ) AmeriCorps has the sole authority to remove a VISTA from a project where they have been assigned.
( b ) AmeriCorps has the sole authority to terminate for cause or otherwise terminate a VISTA from the VISTA program.
( c ) Neither the sponsoring organization nor any of its subrecipients has the authority to remove a VISTA from a project or to terminate a VISTA for cause, or for any other basis, from the VISTA program.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1583 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1583

           To further competition in the insurance industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Taylor, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Baird, Mr. Hare, 
 and Mr. Nadler of New York) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
Committees on Energy and Commerce and Financial Services, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To further competition in the insurance industry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Insurance Industry Competition Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--The Act of March 9, 1945 (59 Stat. 33; 15 U.S.C. 
1011 et seq.) (commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 2(b) (15 U.S.C. 1012(b)), by--
                    (A) inserting ``as it relates to unfair methods of 
                competition,'' after ``Commission Act, as amended,''; 
                and
                    (B) striking ``to the extent that such business is 
                not regulated by State law'' and inserting ``The 
                Federal Trade Commission Act, as it relates to areas 
                other than unfair methods of competition, shall be 
                applicable to the business of insurance to the extent 
                that such business is not regulated by State law.''; 
                and
            (2) by striking section 3 (15 U.S.C. 1013).
    (b) Federal Trade Commission Act.--Section 6 of the Federal Trade 
Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 46) is amended by striking the third 
undesignated paragraph following subsection (i).

SEC. 3. JOINT ENFORCEMENT POLICY STATEMENT.

    The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission may 
issue joint statements of their antitrust enforcement policies 
regarding joint activities in the business of insurance.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 69138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Pathway to independence (PI) Award.
    Date: December 11, 2006.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Gerald L. McLaughlin, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute of 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401. 301-402-6626. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98fff5a9acadf9d8f6f1f0b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96f1fba7a2a3f7d6f8fffeb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 21, 2006.
David Clary,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9459 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 2551.91 What is the process for application and award of a grant? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) *How and when may an eligible organization apply for a grant?* ( 1 ) An eligible organization may file an application in response to CNCS' published request, such as a Notice of Funding Opportunity or a Notice of Funding Availability. Applicants are not assured of selection or approval and may have to compete with other applicants.
( 2 ) The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” (3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 197) in 45 CFR part 1233 and any other applicable requirements.
( b ) *Who reviews the merits of an application and how is a grant awarded?* ( 1 ) CNCS reviews and determines the merit of an application by its responsiveness to published guidelines and to the overall purposes and objectives of the program. When funds are available, CNCS awards a grant in writing to each applicant whose grant proposal provides the best potential for serving the purpose of the program.
( 2 ) The award will be documented by the Notice of Grant Award (NGA). CNCS and the sponsoring organization are the parties to the NGA. The NGA will document the sponsor's commitment to fulfill specific programmatic objectives and financial obligations. It will document the extent of CNCS' obligation to provide financial support to the sponsor.
( c ) *What happens if CNCS rejects an application?* CNCS will notify the applicant if the applicant is not approved for funding, along with an explanation of CNCS' decision.
( d ) *For what period of time does CNCS award a grant?* CNCS awards a Senior Companion grant for a specified period that is usually three years in duration.
[83 FR 64647, Dec. 17, 2018]
#### § 309.160 How will OCSE determine if Tribal IV-D program funds are appropriately expended?

OCSE will rely on audits conducted under 45 CFR part 75, *Subpart F—Audit Requirements.* The Department has determined that this program is to be audited as a major program in accordance with section 215(c) of the circular. The Department may supplement the required audits through reviews or audits conducted by its own staff.

[69 FR 16672, Mar. 30, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016; 81 FR 93569, Dec. 20, 2016]
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: Vtof^l^^c^ fyr hat^jh^Mf^a^ idfuLt . (//'^ff^/^^M M^^ ^ M'f^^ ^ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(&) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of fmal rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

^^^ ^ This document is not a fmal rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

Signature 

L.t H u 

Name 

//f^^^l/ \nuc-h^\ OM'f£, o r ^-u^i^jiLUif/rhy-ZLj... 

Title/Office 

Date
§ 2551.102 What are the conditions of service of non-stipended Senior Companions? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Non-stipended Senior Companions serve under the following conditions: ( a ) They must not displace or prevent eligible low-income individuals from becoming Senior Companions.
( b ) No special privilege or status is granted or created among Senior Companions, whether stipended or non-stipended, and equal treatment is required.
( c ) Training, supervision, and other support services and cost reimbursements, other than the stipend, are available equally to all Senior Companions.
( d ) All regulations and requirements applicable to the program apply to Senior Companions.
( e ) Non-stipended Senior Companions may contribute the costs they incur in connection with their participation in the program. An SCP project may not count such contributions as part of the required non-CNCS support (match) for the grant.
[64 FR 14115, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64648, Dec. 17, 2018]
#### § 3.44 Solicitation.

It shall be unlawful for a person (other than an employee using authorized bulletin boards), without prior written approval of the Director, to offer or display any article or service for sale within the enclave buildings or grounds; or to display any sign, placard, or other form of advertisement; or to collect private debts; or to solicit business, alms, subscriptions or contributions, except in connection with approved national or local campaigns for funds for welfare, health and other public interest purposes, or solicitation of labor organization membership or dues as authorized under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-454).

This provision shall not apply to authorized lessees and their agents and employees with regard to space leased for commercial, cultural, educational, or recreational purposes, under the Public Buildings Cooperative Use Act of 1976 (40 U.S.C. 490(A)(16)).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  Pawnbrokers  Exchange,  Inc.  June  30,  2000  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                0001069563
<NAME>               Pawnbrokers Exchange, Inc.
<CURRENCY>           US



<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>      1.00

<CASH>                                              (2,663)
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         63,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    83,035
<PP&E>                                              49,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      112,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               151,022
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            191,372
<OTHER-SE>                                          (230,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        112,110
<SALES>                                             80,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    80,371
<CGS>                                               30,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       30,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    103,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  8,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (53,137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (53,137)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (53,137)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)



</TABLE>
#### § 2516.520 How does a State, Indian tribe, or community-based entity review the merits of an application?

In reviewing the merits of an application for a subgrant under this part, a Corporation grantee must use the criteria and priorities in § 2516.500.

[59 FR 13786, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 74 FR 46504, Sept. 10, 2009]
§ 17.4 Regulatory investigations and trial-type proceedings. Adverse information relating to regulatory investigations of specifically identified persons or organizations or to pending agency trial-type proceedings shall be released only in limited circumstances in accordance with the criteria outlined below: ( a ) Where the Department or a principal operating component determines that there is a significant risk that the public health or safety may be impaired or substantial economic harm may occur unless the public is notified immediately, it may release information to news media as one of the means of notifying the affected public speedily and accurately. However, where the Department or principal operating component determines that public harm can be avoided by immediate discontinuance of an offending practice, a respondent shall be allowed an opportunity, where feasible, to cease the practice (pending a legal test) in lieu of release of adverse information by the agency.
( b ) Where it is required in order to bring notice of pending agency adjudication to persons likely to desire to participate therein or likely to be affected by that or a related adjudication, the Department or principal operating component shall rely on the news media to the extent necessary to provide such notice even though it may be adverse to a respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77061-77062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Tree Care Industry Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 27, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Tree Care Industry 
Association, Inc. (``TCIA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development

[[Page 77062]]

activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, TCIA 
recently finalized and adopted four standards: BSR A300 Part 5 
Management of Trees and Shrubs--Standard Practices (Management of Trees 
and Shrubs During Site Planning, Site Development, and Construction); 
BSR A300 Part 6 Transplanting; PINS A300 Part 7 Integrated Vegetation 
Management; and TCIA Accreditation Council Standards for Accreditation 
Draft 5 Version 2.
    On September 8, 2004, TCIA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
October 4, 2004 (69 FR 59271).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9833 Filed 12-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Long *v.*Hodges.

Submitted July 18,

Decided November 10, 1906.

Practice in the Supreme Court.

*8. L. Olive,*for plaintiff in error. *J. N. Worley,*contra.

Cobb, P. J.

This case is controlled by the rulings this day made in the case of *Long*v. *Bank of Minden.*

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*