alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 23, 2017

s0620

Order 

Clerk

June 23, 2017

155905

SC: 155905

In re M. M. GIDLEY, Minor. COA: 335642

Oakland CC Family Division:

2015-836720-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Switch & Data Facilities Company, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith Olsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:
February 26, 2008



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KEITH
OLSEN                                                           
|Keith Olsen                                                                  
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer)
EX-33 (g)

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

SERVICER'S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE


Washington Mutual Bank (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") of the Platform Transactions
(as defined below) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122), except the following criteria 1(iii) and
3(i)(C) and (D), which we have concluded are either (i) not applicable to the
servicing of the mortgage loans included in the Platform Transactions (each, a
"Mortgage Loan"), or (ii) performed by other parties with respect to the
Mortgage Loans (such criteria, after giving effect to the foregoing exceptions,
the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this
Servicer's Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that
were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1, 2007 for
which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item
1122(d), that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933, and for which the Asserting Party has an obligation to
deliver an Assessment of Compliance pursuant to Item 1122 (the "Platform
Transactions").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable Servicing
Criterion, and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Mortgage Loans.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report on the Asserting Party's assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

Dated: March 14, 2007

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


By:    /s/ H. John Berens
Name:  H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
Exhibit 4.2

 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated June 5, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2029 contained in Amendment
No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-237866) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.




	 	/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP






 


Chicago, Illinois


June 5, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rings To Dine For, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jason Yabut, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2007

                                        By: /s/  Jason Yabut
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Jason Yabut
                                            Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 1303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

§ 1303.73 Trip routing. ( a ) A program must consider safety of the children it transports when it plans fixed routes.
( b ) A program must also ensure: ( 1 ) The time a child is in transit to and from the program must not exceed one hour unless there is no shorter route available or any alternative shorter route is either unsafe or impractical;
( 2 ) Vehicles are not loaded beyond maximum passenger capacity at any time;
( 3 ) Drivers do not back up or make U-turns, except when necessary for safety reasons or because of physical barriers;
( 4 ) Stops are located to minimize traffic disruptions and to afford the driver a good field of view in front of and behind the vehicle;
( 5 ) When possible, stops are located to eliminate the need for children to cross the street or highway to board or leave the vehicle;
( 6 ) Either a bus monitor or another adult escorts children across the street to board or leave the vehicle if curbside pick-up or drop off is impossible; and,
( 7 ) Drivers use alternate routes in the case of hazardous conditions that could affect the safety of the children who are being transported, such as ice or water build up, natural gas line breaks, or emergency road closing.
#### City Real Estate Company, Appellant, *v.*Union Trust Company of New York, as Executor of William F. King, Deceased, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

*City Beal Estate Co.*v. *King,*126 App. Div. 911, affirmed.

(Argued November 17, 1909;

decided December 7, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment entered July 28, 1908, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action to recover upon a bond and to foreclose a mortgage.

*Edward E. Sprague*for appellant.

*Benjamin A. Morton*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 81016          Scale: 967,700          Edition: 1          Edition Date: 01-APR-25          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1925/18**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
#### § 672.18 Filing the transcript.

The hearing shall be transcribed verbatim. After the Presiding Officer closes the record, the reporter shall promptly transmit the original and certified copies to the Hearing Clerk, and one certified copy directly to the Presiding Officer. A certificate of service shall accompany each copy of the transcript. The Hearing Clerk shall notify all parties of the availability of the transcript and shall furnish the parties with a copy of the transcript upon payment of the cost of reproduction, unless a party can show that the cost is unduly burdensome. Any person not a party to the proceeding may obtain a copy of the transcript upon payment of the reproduction fee, except for those parts of the transcript ordered to be kept confidential by the Presiding Officer.
# Presidential Determination on Waiver of Conditions on Obligations and Expenditure of Funds for Planning, Design, and Construction of a Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility in Russia for Calendar Year 2007

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375) (the “Act”), I hereby certify that waiving the conditions described in section 1305 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106-65), as amended, is important to the national security interests of the United States, and include herein, for submission to the Congress, the statement, justification, and plan described in section 1303 of the Act. This waiver shall apply for calendar year 2007.

                    You are authorized and directed to transmit this certification, including the statement, justification, and plan, to the Congress and to arrange for the publication of this certification in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 06-9913

Billing code 4710-10-P
Editorial Note on Part 304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 304.25 Treatment of expenditures; due date. ( a ) *Treatment of expenditures.* Expenditures are considered to be made on the date on which the cash disbursements occur or the date to which allocated in accordance with part 75 of this title. In the case of local administration, the date of disbursements by the local agency governs. In the case of purchase of services from another public agency, the date of disbursements by such other public agency governs. Different rules may be applied with respect to a State, either generally or for particular classes of expenditures only upon justification by the State to the Office of Child Support Enforcement and approval by the Office.
( b ) *Due date for expenditure statements.* The due date for the submission of the quarterly statement of expenditures under § 301.15 of this chapter is 45 days after the end of the quarter.
[42 FR 26427, May 24, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 3021, Jan. 20, 2016; 81 FR 93568, Dec. 20, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Network Installation Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2004 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.



                                  /s/  Michael  Cummings
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael  Cummings
                                  Chief  Executive  Officer


Dated:  November  22,  2004



                                  /s/  Michael  Novielli
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Michael  Novielli
                                  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer

Dated:  November  22,  2003





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a two day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. 

# DATES:

                        June 11-12, 2007.                               ( print page 10259)    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judicial Building, Mecham Conference Center, One Columbus Circle, NE., Washington, DC 20544. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office. 

[FR Doc. 07-1046 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
§ 411.71 ORR monitoring and evaluation of care provider facilities following an allegation of sexual abuse or sexual harassment. ( a ) Upon receiving an allegation of sexual abuse or sexual harassment that occurs at an ORR care provider facility, ORR will monitor and evaluate the care provider facility to ensure that the care provider facility complied with the requirements of this section or ORR policies and procedures. Upon conclusion of an outside investigation, ORR must review any available completed investigation reports to determine whether additional monitoring and evaluation activities are required.
( b ) ORR must develop written policies and procedures for incident monitoring and evaluation of sexual abuse and sexual harassment allegations, including provision requiring: ( 1 ) Reviewing prior complaints and reports of sexual abuse and sexual harassment involving the suspected perpetrator;
( 2 ) Determining whether actions or failures to act at the care provider facility contributed to the abuse or harassment;
( 3 ) Determining if any ORR policies and procedures or relevant legal authorities were broken; and
( 4 ) Retention of such reports for as long as the alleged abuser or harasser is in ORR custody or employed by ORR or the care provider facility, plus ten years.
( c ) ORR must ensure that its incident monitoring and evaluation does not interfere with any ongoing investigation conducted by State or local Child Protective Services, the State or local licensing agency, or law enforcement.
( d ) When outside agencies investigate an allegation of sexual abuse or sexual harassment, the care provider facility and ORR must cooperate with outside investigators.
Order entered October 3 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 00734 - CR BERNARD KIPNGENO NGETICH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. F - 11 - 62810 - S



### O RDER On May 29 , 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, spe cific court costs, fees, and court app ointed attorney fees. On June 11 , 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record . However, the detailed itemization of costs included in the supplemental record does not comply with the Texa s Code of Criminal Procedure. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. arts. 103.001, 103.006 (West 2006). Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record that contains a detailed itemizat ion of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the TexasCode of Criminal Procedure

. See id

. arts. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged

with the cost until a written bill is pr oduced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost .”) (Emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of costs to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed.”) (Emphasis added). We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this o rder, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-153207 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-150067 and 333-18530 on Form S-8 of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation of our report, which includesan explanatory paragraph pertaining to TerraSea Environmental Solutions, LLC’s ability to continue as a going concern, dated March 6, 2015, on our audit of the financial statements of TerraSea Environmental Solutions, LLC as ofDecember 31, 2014 and for the year then ended, which report is included in the Form 10-K of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

/s/CohnReznick LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 6, 2015
Case 1:11-cv-00562 Document 65 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The MONY Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael I. Roth, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY Group Inc.



|/s/    MICHAEL I.
ROTHMichael I.
Roth
|-------------------------------------



November 14, 2003



This statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The MONY Group Inc. and will be retained by The MONY Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2 nd . A correction was made to add the “What You

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2 , 2015

Mr. Ron C. Christenson

1595 Clemson R d.

Reno, Nevada 89502

Dear Mr

. Christenson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It expl ains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your April 1 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0876 ), but

we are unable to process your request any f urther. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to pro cess your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analys t , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure