alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 411.22 Policies to ensure investigation of allegations and appropriate agency oversight. ( a ) ORR and care provider facilities must ensure that each allegation of sexual abuse and sexual harassment, including a third-party or anonymous allegation, is immediately referred to all appropriate investigating authorities, including Child Protective Services, the State or local licensing agency, and law enforcement. Care provider facilities also must immediately report each allegation of sexual abuse and sexual harassment to ORR according to ORR policies and procedures. The care provider facility has an affirmative duty to keep abreast of the investigation(s) and cooperate with outside investigators. ORR also must remain informed of ongoing investigations and fully cooperate as necessary.
( b ) Care provider facilities must maintain or attempt to enter into a written memorandum of understanding or other agreement specific to investigations of sexual abuse and sexual harassment with the law enforcement agency, designated State or local Child Protective Services, and/or the State or local licensing agencies responsible for conducting sexual abuse and sexual harassment investigations, as appropriate. Care provider facilities must maintain a copy of the agreement or documentation showing attempts to enter into an agreement.
( c ) Care provider facilities must maintain documentation for at least ten years of all reports and referrals of allegations of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
( d ) ORR will refer an allegation of sexual abuse to the Department of Justice or other investigating authority for further investigation where such reporting is in accordance with its policies and procedures and any memoranda of understanding.
( e ) All allegations of sexual abuse that occur at emergency care provider facilities operating on fully Federal properties must be reported to the Department of Justice in accordance with ORR policies and procedures and any memoranda of understanding.
§ 604.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and  Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 22, 2006



/s/  Jack Abramov

Jack Abramov

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Pauline Schneider

Pauline Schneider

Chief Financial Officer
§ 30.32 Discharge of indebtedness; reporting requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) Before discharging a delinquent debt, also referred to as close out of the debt, the Secretary shall take all appropriate steps to collect the debt in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(g)(9), and parts 30 through 33 of this chapter, including, as applicable, administrative offset; tax refund offset; Federal salary offset; credit bureau reporting; administrative wage garnishment; litigation; foreclosure; and referral to Treasury, Treasury-designated debt collection centers, or private collection contractors.
( 2 ) Discharge of indebtedness is distinct from termination or suspension of collection activity under this subpart, and is governed by the Internal Revenue Code. When collection action on a debt is suspended or terminated, the debt remains delinquent and further collection action may be pursued at a later date in accordance with the standards set forth in this part and 31 CFR parts 900 through 904.
( 3 ) When the Department discharges a debt in full or in part, further collection action is prohibited. Therefore, before discharging a debt, the Secretary must: ( i ) Make the determination that collection action is no longer warranted; and
( ii ) Terminate debt collection action.
( b ) In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(i), the Secretary shall use competitive procedures to sell a delinquent debt upon termination of collection action if the Secretary of the Treasury determines such a sale is in the best interests of the United States. Since the discharge of a debt precludes any further collection action, including the sale of a delinquent debt, the Secretary may not discharge a debt until the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3711(i) have been meet.
( c ) Upon discharge of an indebtedness, the Secretary must report the discharge to the IRS in accordance with the requirements of 26 U.S.C. 6050P and 26 CFR 1.6050P-1. The Secretary may request that Treasury or Treasury-designated debt collection centers file such a discharge report to the IRS on the Department's behalf.
( d ) When discharging a debt, the Secretary must request that litigation counsel release any liens of record securing the debt.
# CHAVES COUNTY Britt Snyder, 

## Sheriff jbsnyder@co.chaves.nm.us

February 8, 2016 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

# SHERIFF'S OFFICE

Re: Modification to Exemption No.11265 request under Section 333 oftheFAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations submitted September 19, 2014.

Dear Sir or Madam: Respectfully, on behalfofboththeChaves County Sheriff's Office and the Roswell Coalition as petitioners, we request an amendment to our existing exemption to add an additional operator to our exemption certificate. The new additional operator will be National ISR Service Company, Inc. (NISCO). They are the current operators ofour approved Aeryon SkyRanger, Serial#ASM-000521-07-SR4008790. They are operationally headquartered at 2502 Clark Carr Loop SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106. The same SkyRanger sUAS had been approved in our previous exemption. The operating documents already forwarded to 333exemptions@faa.gov clarifying the safety and operational features ofthis vehicle remain unchanged. This addition to ExemptionNo. 11265 will not change missions, training, and/or maintenanceperformedby City ofRoswell Coalition representatives. Thanks again for yourhelp with approving ourrequest. Ifyou have questions orconcerns, please contactme or NISCO representative, Patrick M. Mooney, at (505) 259-5970. He can also be reached at: mooney@national-isr.com.

# ~.=."'-- eriffBtifCS 

### Y er Chaves County Sheriff's Office #1 Saint Mary's Place Roswell, NM 88203 (575) 624-6500 jbsnyder@co.chavez.nm.us Member, The Roswell Coalition



### P.O. Box 1396 

## * #1 Saint Mary's Place 

## * Roswell, NM 88202-1396 Phone (575) 624-6500 

## * Fax (575) 624-6518 

## * Toll Free 1 (800) 658-2039
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-5358 September Term, 2013

1:11-cv-02168-CKK

Filed On: May 13, 2014

Combat Veterans for Congress Political Action

Committee and David H. Wiggs, Treasurer,

Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Appellee

BEFORE: Griffith, Srinivasan, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition

thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are

not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley,

819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the

Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Per Curiam

USCA Case #13-5358 Document #1492676 Filed: 05/13/2014 Page 1 of 1
§ 2556.500 How is a position for a summer associate established in a project? Subject to VISTA assistance availability, AmeriCorps approves the establishment of summer associate positions based on the following factors: ( a ) The need in the community, as demonstrated by the sponsor, for the performance of project activities by a summer associate(s);
( b ) The content and quality of summer associate project plans;
( c ) The capacity of the sponsor to implement the summer associate project activities; and
( d ) The sponsor's compliance with all applicable parts of the DVSA, VISTA program policy, and the sponsor's Memorandum of Agreement, which incorporates their project application.
§ 5.62 How do I file an appeal? ( a ) You have the right to appeal an adverse agency determination of your FOIA request.
( b ) You may submit your appeal via mail or electronically. ( 1 ) Please send your appeal to the review official at the address provided in your denial letter. If you are unsure who is the appropriate review official, please contact the FOIA Requester Service Center that processed your request to obtain that information.
( 2 ) The addresses to mail FOIA appeals for CMS and OS are, respectively: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Attn: Principal Deputy Administrator, Room C5-16- 03, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Deputy Agency Chief FOIA Officer, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Room 729H, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. Additionally, information, including how to submit a FOIA appeal electronically, can be found at the following online locations for CMS and OS: *https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/FOIA/filehow.html and https://requests.publiclink.hhs.gov/palMain.aspx .*
( 3 ) When submitting an appeal, you should mark both your letter and envelope with the words “FOIA Appeal” or include the words “FOIA Appeal” in the subject line of your email. You should also include your FOIA request tracking number, a copy of your initial request, and a copy of our final determination letter.
( c ) Your appeal should clearly identify the agency determination that is being appealed. It would be helpful if you provide specific reasons explaining why you believe the agency's adverse determination should be reconsidered.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

National Science Board Public Service Award Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: National Science Board Public Service Award Committee (5195).
    Date and Time: Tuesday January 16, 2007, 11:00 a.m. EST 
(teleconference meeting).
    Place: The teleconference will originate from the National Science 
Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ms. Ann Noonan, National Science Board Office, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: 703-292-7000.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations in the 
selection of the NSB Public Service Award recipients.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for closing: The nominations being reviewed include 
information of a personal nature where public disclosure would 
constitute clearly unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. These 
matters are exempt from open meeting and public attendance requirements 
under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 10(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6).

    Dated: December 21, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-9898 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
From: - HaileyArends < hailey@capitoloperations.com > 

Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 11:37 AM 

To: Camilla Reminsky 

Cc: Neil P. Reiff; Zuzana Pacious 

Subject: Re: O'Malley Audit 

Hi Camilla, 

We believe the report amendments and US Treasuiy check should resolve the remaining issues. No additional 

comment was submitted. 

Thank you, 

Hailey
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )
) LRA 1027
Request for Consideration of a Legal )
Question Submitted by David Vitter for )
USS. Senate )

CERTIFICATION

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission executive
session on October 25, 2016, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 6-0, on
an amended pre-meeting tally, to conclude that the Committee is required to refund all general
election contributions it accepted.

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted

affirmatively for the decision.

Attest:
(Gcbrher 27 aot Seno. Burr’
Date (Shelley E. Garg)

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
§ 160.534 The hearing. ( a ) The ALJ must conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the respondent should be found liable under this part.
( b ) ( 1 ) The respondent has the burden of going forward and the burden of persuasion with respect to any: ( i ) Affirmative defense pursuant to § 160.410 of this part;
( ii ) Challenge to the amount of a proposed penalty pursuant to §§ 160.404-160.408 of this part, including any factors raised as mitigating factors; or
( iii ) Claim that a proposed penalty should be reduced or waived pursuant to § 160.412 of this part; and
( iv ) Compliance with subpart D of part 164, as provided under § 164.414(b).
( 2 ) The Secretary has the burden of going forward and the burden of persuasion with respect to all other issues, including issues of liability other than with respect to subpart D of part 164, and the existence of any factors considered aggravating factors in determining the amount of the proposed penalty.
( 3 ) The burden of persuasion will be judged by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The hearing must be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
( d ) ( 1 ) Subject to the 15-day rule under § 160.518(a) and the admissibility of evidence under § 160.540, either party may introduce, during its case in chief, items or information that arose or became known after the date of the issuance of the notice of proposed determination or the request for hearing, as applicable. Such items and information may not be admitted into evidence, if introduced— ( i ) By the Secretary, unless they are material and relevant to the acts or omissions with respect to which the penalty is proposed in the notice of proposed determination pursuant to § 160.420 of this part, including circumstances that may increase penalties; or
( ii ) By the respondent, unless they are material and relevant to an admission, denial or explanation of a finding of fact in the notice of proposed determination under § 160.420 of this part, or to a specific circumstance or argument expressly stated in the request for hearing under § 160.504, including circumstances that may reduce penalties.
( 2 ) After both parties have presented their cases, evidence may be admitted in rebuttal even if not previously exchanged in accordance with § 160.518.
[71 FR 8428, Feb. 16, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 42767, Aug. 24, 2009; 78 FR 5692, Jan. 25, 2013]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Action ResearchAdult EducationCommunity DevelopmentEducational NeedsElementary Secondary EducationHuman CapitalLow Income CountiesPovertyPublic PolicyResearch NeedsRural AreasSchool Community RelationshipSocial Capital

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 283.6 If a State wants to be considered for bonus eligibility, what data on abortions must it submit? ( a ) To be considered further for bonus eligibility, each potentially eligible State, as identified under § 283.5, must submit to ACF data and information on the number of abortions for calendar year 1995 within two months of this notification. This number must measure either of the following: ( 1 ) For calendar year 1995, the total number of abortions performed by all providers within the State; or
( 2 ) For calendar year 1995, the total number of abortions performed by all providers within the State on the total population of State residents only. This is the preferred measure.
( b ) States must have obtained these data on abortions for calendar year 1995 within 60 days of publication of the final rule and must include with their submission of 1995 data an official record documenting when they obtained the abortion data.
( c ) Within two months of notification by ACF of potential eligibility, the State must submit: ( 1 ) The number of abortions performed for the most recent year for which abortion data are available (as defined in § 283.2 to mean the year that is two calendar years prior to the current calendar year). In measuring the number of abortions, the State must use the same definition, either under paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of this section, for both 1995 and the most recent year; or
( 2 ) If applicable, the adjusted number and information specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) If the State's data collection or reporting methodology changed between 1995 and the bonus year in such a way as to reflect an increase or decrease in the number of abortions that is different than what actually occurred during the period, the State must: ( 1 ) When submitting the number of abortions for the most recent year under paragraph (c)(2), adjust the number to exclude increases or decreases in the number due to changes in methodology for collecting or reporting the data. For example, this calculation should include adjustments for increases or decreases in response rates for providers in reporting abortion data;
( 2 ) Provide a rationale for the adjustment, i.e., a description of how the data collection or reporting methodology was changed. This could include a description of how legislative, policy or procedural changes affected the collection or reporting of abortion data, or an indication of changes in the response rate of providers in reporting abortion data; and
( 3 ) Provide a certification by the Governor, or his or her designee, that the number of abortions reported to ACF accurately reflects these adjustments for changes in data collection or reporting methodology.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND :

ETHICS IN WASHINGTON and :

NOAH BOOKBINDER :

:

Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 18-76 (RC)

:

v. : Re Document Nos.: 12, 13

:

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion separately and 

contemporaneously issued, the Federal Election Commission’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

(ECF No. 13) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is 

DENIED. It is thus hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2019 RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge

Case 1:18-cv-00076-RC Document 22 Filed 03/29/19 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Irene H. Oh, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:           May 7, 2010








/s/ IRENE H. OH


Irene H. Oh


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer
§ 270.7 What data will we use to measure performance on the work support and other measures? ( a ) We will use Census Bureau data to rank States on their performance on the Food Stamp measures in § 270.4(c) and on the measure of family formation and stability in § 270.4(f). We will also use Census Bureau data, along with other information, to rank States on the child care measure in § 270.4(e). We will rank only those States that choose to compete on these measures.
( b ) We will rank State performance on the Medicaid/SCHIP measures in § 270.4(d) based on data submitted by those States that choose to compete on these measures, as determined by matching TANF individuals who were enrolled in Medicaid/SCHIP and are no longer receiving TANF assistance with Medicaid/SCHIP enrollment data.
( c ) We will rank State performance on the child care measure based on data submitted by those States that choose to compete on this measure. We will use data reported on Forms ACF 800, ACF 801, ACF 696 and other necessary data we will specify.