Final Audit Report of the 

Commission on Marsha 

Blackburn for Congress, Inc.

(January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2016)

Why the Audit 

Was Done

Federal law permits the 

Commission to conduct 

audits and field 

investigations of any 

political committee that is 

required to file reports 

under the Federal 

Election Campaign Act 

(the Act). The 

Commission generally 

conducts such audits 

when a committee 

appears not to have met 

the threshold 

requirements for 

substantial compliance 

with the Act.1 The audit 

determines whether the 

committee complied with 

the limitations, 

prohibitions and 

disclosure requirements 

of the Act.

Future Action

The Commission may 

initiate an enforcement 

action, at a later time, 

with respect to any of the 

matters discussed in this

report.

About the Campaign (p. 2)

Marsha Blackburn for Congress, Inc. is the principal campaign 

committee for Marsha Blackburn, Republican candidate for the 

United States House of Representatives from the state of 

Tennessee, 7th Congressional District, and is headquartered in 

Brentwood, Tennessee. For more information, see the Campaign 

Organization chart, p. 2.

Financial Activity (p. 2)

 Receipts

o Contributions from Individuals

o Contributions from Political 

Committees

o Offsets to Operating 

Expenditures

o Other Receipts

Total Receipts

$ 901,473 

1,283,361

20,203

36,194

$ 2,241,231

 Disbursements

o Operating Expenditures

o Contribution Refunds

o Other Disbursements

Total Disbursements

$ 1,514,739 

13,100

24,061

$ 1,551,900

Commission Findings (p. 3)

 Misstatement of Financial Activity (Finding 1)

 Disclosure of Occupation and Name of Employer (Finding 2)

 Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit (Finding 3)

 

1

 52 U.S.C. §30111(b).
Final Audit Report of the 

Commission on Marsha Blackburn 

for Congress, Inc.

(January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2016)
Table of Contents

Page

Part I. Background

Authority for Audit 1

Scope of Audit 1

Audit Hearing 1

Part II. Overview of Campaign

Campaign Organization 2

Overview of Financial Activity 2

Part III. Summaries

Commission Findings 3

Part IV. Commission Findings

Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity 5

Finding 2. Disclosure of Occupation and Name of Employer 7

Finding 3. Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit 11
1

Part I

Background

Authority for Audit

This report is based on an audit of Marsha Blackburn for Congress, Inc.2(MBF),

undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal Election Commission (the Commission) 

in accordance with the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the Act). 

The Audit Division conducted the audit pursuant to 52 U.S.C. §30111(b), which permits 

the Commission to conduct audits and field investigations of any political committee that 

is required to file a report under 52 U.S.C. §30104. Prior to conducting any audit under 

this subsection, the Commission must perform an internal review of reports filed by 

selected committees to determine if the reports filed by a particular committee meet the 

threshold requirements for substantial compliance with the Act. 52 U.S.C. §30111(b).

Scope of Audit

Following Commission-approved procedures, the Audit staff evaluated various risk 

factors and as a result, this audit examined: 

1. the receipt of excessive contributions;

2. the receipt of contributions from prohibited sources;

3. the disclosure of contributions received;

4. the disclosure of individual contributors’ occupation and name of employer;

5. the consistency between reported figures and bank records;

6. the completeness of records; and

7. other committee operations necessary to the review.

Audit Hearing

MBF declined the opportunity for a hearing before the Commission on the matters 

presented in this report.

 

2 On October 12, 2017, the Commission received a Statement of Organization from Marsha Blackburn for 

Congress, Inc. officially changing its name to Marsha for Senate.
2

Part II

Overview of Campaign

Campaign Organization

Overview of Financial Activity

(Audited Amounts)

Cash-on-hand @ January 1, 2015 $ 1,862,627

Receipts

o Contributions from Individuals 901,473

o Contributions from Political Committees 1,283,361

o Offsets to Operating Expenditures 20,203

o Other Receipts 36,194

Total Receipts $ 2,241,231

Disbursements

o Operating Expenditures 1,514,739

o Contribution Refunds 13,100

o Other Disbursements 24,061

Total Disbursements $ 1,551,900

Cash-on-hand @ December 31, 2016 $ 2,551,958

Important Dates

 Date of Registration April 25, 2002

 Audit Coverage January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2016

Headquarters Brentwood, TN

Bank Information

 Bank Depositories Three

 Bank Accounts Two checking, One money market, One 

escrow account

Treasurer

 Treasurer When Audit Was Conducted Telisha Hoffmann 4/25/02-10/11/17

Ronald Gant 10/12/17-Present

 Treasurer During Period Covered by Audit Telisha Hoffmann 

Management Information

 Attended FEC Campaign Finance Seminar Yes

 Who Handled Accounting and 

Recordkeeping Tasks

Paid Staff
3

Part III

Summaries

Commission Findings

Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity

During audit fieldwork, a comparison of MBF’s reported financial activity with its bank 

records revealed a misstatement of receipts and disbursements for calendar year 2016. 

MBF understated its receipts and disbursements by $48,127 and $46,895, respectively. 

In response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF said that it may be 

“...overly burdensome or even impossible...” to remedy the misstatements due to the 

departure of its compliance staff from the 2015-2016 cycle. MBF added that it made 

changes to its compliance operations which will ensure greater accuracy in future reports. 

In response to the Draft Final Audit Report, MBF filed amended disclosure reports. The 

Audit staff concluded that MBF misstated its receipts and disbursements for calendar 

year 2016; however, the amended disclosure reports materially corrected the public 

record.

The Commission approved a finding that MBF misstated its receipts and disbursements 

for calendar year 2016. (For more detail, see p. 5.)

Finding 2. Disclosure of Occupation and Name of 

Employer 

A review of contributions from individuals requiring itemization indicated that 180 

contributions totaling $160,880 lacked or had inadequate disclosure of occupation and/or 

name of employer. MBF did not sufficiently demonstrate “best efforts” to obtain, 

maintain and submit this information. In response to audit fieldwork, MBF provided 

some documentation of “best efforts;” however, MBF had not filed amendments to 

provide the missing information and establish “best efforts.” In response to the Interim 

Audit Report recommendation, MBF materially corrected the public record by including 

memo entries in its most recently filed disclosure report, providing the missing 

contributor occupation and name of employer information relating to 165 contributions 

totaling $156,900. In response to the Draft Final Audit Report, MBF did not provide any 

additional comments. The Audit staff concluded that MBF failed to disclose or 

inadequately disclosed occupation and name of employer information for 180 

contributions from individuals totaling $160,880; however, MBF filed amended 

disclosure reports which materially corrected the public record.

The Commission approved a finding that MBF failed to disclose or inadequately 

disclosed occupation and name of employer information for 180 contributions from 

individuals totaling $160,880. (For more detail, see p. 7.)
4

Finding 3. Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit

During audit fieldwork, the Audit staff reviewed contributions from individuals to 

determine if any exceeded the contribution limit. This review indicated that MBF 

received apparent excessive contributions totaling $100,350. These errors occurred as a 

result of MBF not resolving the excessive portions of contributions by forwarding 

presumptive redesignation or reattribution letters to its contributors, obtaining signed 

reattribution letters from its contributors, or issuing refunds of the excessive portions of 

contributions in a timely manner. In response to audit fieldwork and the exit conference, 

MBF untimely resolved excessive contributions from individuals totaling $88,150. In 

response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF provided two completed 

reattribution letters from the contributors and copies of four refund checks which 

untimely resolved the remaining excessive contributions. In response to the Draft Final 

Audit Report, MBF did not provide any additional comments. The Audit staff concluded 

that MBF received excessive contributions totaling $100,350, and they were resolved by 

MBF, albeit untimely.

The Commission approved a finding that MBF received excessive contributions totaling 

$100,350. (For more detail, see p. 11.)
5

Part IV

Commission Findings

Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity

Summary

During audit fieldwork, a comparison of MBF’s reported financial activity with its bank 

records revealed a misstatement of receipts and disbursements for calendar year 2016. 

MBF understated its receipts and disbursements by $48,127 and $46,895, respectively. 

In response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF said that it may be 

“...overly burdensome or even impossible...” to remedy the misstatements due to the 

departure of its compliance staff from the 2015-2016 cycle. MBF added that it made 

changes to its compliance operations which will ensure greater accuracy in future reports. 

In response to the Draft Final Audit Report, MBF filed amended disclosure reports. The 

Audit staff concluded that MBF misstated its receipts and disbursements for calendar 

year 2016; however, the amended disclosure reports materially corrected the public 

record.

The Commission approved a finding that MBF misstated its receipts and disbursements 

for calendar year 2016.

Legal Standard

Contents of Reports. Each report must disclose:

 The amount of cash-on-hand at the beginning and end of the reporting period;

 The total amount of receipts for the reporting period and for the election cycle;

 The total amount of disbursements for the reporting period and for the election 

cycle; and

 Certain transactions that require itemization on Schedule A (Itemized Receipts) or

Schedule B (Itemized Disbursements). 52 U.S.C. §30104(b)(l), (2), (3), (4) and 

(5).

Facts and Analysis

A. Facts

During audit fieldwork, the Audit staff reconciled MBF’s reported financial activity with 

its bank records for calendar years 2015 and 2016. For the 2016 bank reconciliation, the 

Audit staff identified a misstatement of receipts and disbursements. The following chart 

details the discrepancies between MBF’s disclosure reports and bank activity. The 

succeeding paragraphs explain why the discrepancies occurred.
6

2016 Committee Activity

Reported Bank Records Discrepancy

Beginning Cash Balance @ 

January 1, 2016

 $2,222,029 $2,220,797 $1,232

Overstated

Receipts $1,261,100 $1,309,227 $48,127

Understated

Disbursements $931,171 $978,066 $46,895

Understated

Ending Cash Balance @ 

December 31, 2016

$2,551,958 $2,551,958 $0

The understatement of receipts resulted from the following:

 Offsets from a payroll processing company not reported + $19,137

 Contributions from individuals not reported + 14,100

 Erroneously deposited funds not reported + 12,500 

 In-kind contributions not reported as a receipt + $1,026

 Contribution from PAC not reported + 1,000

 Unexplained differences + 364

Understatement of Receipts $48,127

The understatement of disbursements resulted from the following:

 Payroll not reported or reported incorrectly + $18,451

 Disbursements not reported or reported incorrectly + 13,101

 Erroneously deposited funds transferred and not reported + 12,500

 Credit card payments not reported or reported incorrectly + 10,253

 Credit card processing fees not reported + 8,376

 In-kind contributions not reported as a disbursement + 1,026

 Bank service fees not reported + $179

 Credit card processing fees reported but did not clear bank - 9,604

 Credit card payment reported but did not clear bank - 4,962

 Contribution refunds reported but did not clear bank - 2,525

 Unexplained differences + 100

Net Understatement of Disbursements $46,895

B. Interim Audit Report & Audit Division Recommendation

At the exit conference, the Audit staff discussed the misstatements for calendar year 2016

with MBF’s representatives and provided schedules detailing the misstatements. MBF

representatives did not provide any comments at the time.

In response to the exit conference, MBF stated that it may follow up with the Audit staff

regarding the best and most efficient manner to correct the public record after its new 

compliance team thoroughly reviews the misstatements. MBF also stated that it made 

changes in its compliance efforts to help ensure accuracy for all future reports.
7

The Interim Audit Report recommended that MBF amend its disclosure reports to correct 

the misstatements noted above and reconcile the cash balance on its most recently filed

report to identify any subsequent discrepancies, as necessary, that may have affected the 

recommended adjustments.

C. Committee Response to Interim Audit Report

In response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF stated that it takes 

compliance and reporting obligations very seriously. MBF acknowledged that the 

Interim Audit Report identified misstatements of financial activity in the disclosure 

reports but MBF noted that the cash-on-hand balance was reported correctly. In addition, 

MBF commented that its new compliance team continued to assess the recommendation 

to amend its disclosure reports with regards to the identified misstatements. Furthermore, 

MBF said that, with the departure of its compliance staff from the 2015-2016 cycle, it 

may be “... overly burdensome or even impossible...” for MBF to remedy the 

misstatements. However, MBF stated that the changes made in its compliance operations 

will ensure greater accuracy in future reports. It is noted that MBF did not provide any 

detail pertaining to the changes it made with the compliance operations. No amended 

reports were filed to correct the misstatements. Absent the filing of amended reports, 

MBF’s 2016 receipts remained understated by $48,127 and its 2016 disbursements 

remained understated by $46,895.

D. Draft Final Audit Report

The Draft Final Audit Report acknowledged the reasons MBF provided for not filing the 

amended reports to correct the public record. However, the Draft Final Audit Report 

concluded that the 2016 receipts and disbursements remained understated.

E. Committee Response to the Draft Final Audit Report

In response to the Draft Final Audit Report, MBF filed amended disclosure reports which

materially corrected the misstatements of financial activity.

Commission Conclusion

On December 6, 2018, the Commission considered the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum in which the Audit staff recommended that the Commission find that MBF 

misstated its receipts and disbursements for calendar year 2016.

The Commission approved the Audit staff’s recommendation.

Finding 2. Disclosure of Occupation and Name of 

Employer 

Summary

A review of contributions from individuals requiring itemization indicated that 180 

contributions totaling $160,880 lacked or had inadequate disclosure of occupation and/or 

name of employer. MBF did not sufficiently demonstrate “best efforts” to obtain, 

maintain and submit this information. In response to audit fieldwork, MBF provided 
8

some documentation of “best efforts;” however, MBF had not filed amendments to 

provide the missing information and establish “best efforts.” In response to the Interim 

Audit Report recommendation, MBF materially corrected the public record by including 

memo entries in its most recently filed disclosure report, providing the missing 

contributor occupation and name of employer information relating to 165 contributions 

totaling $156,900. In response to the Draft Final Audit Report, MBF did not provide any 

additional comments. The Audit staff concluded that MBF failed to disclose or 

inadequately disclosed occupation and name of employer information for 180 

contributions from individuals totaling $160,880; however, MBF filed amended 

disclosure reports which materially corrected the public record.

The Commission approved a finding that MBF failed to disclose or inadequately 

disclosed occupation and name of employer information for 180 contributions from 

individuals totaling $160,880.

Legal Standard

A. Required Information for Contributions from Individuals. For each itemized 

contribution from an individual, the committee must provide the following 

information:

 the contributor’s full name and address (including zip code);

 the contributor’s occupation and the name of his or her employer;

 the date of receipt (the date the committee received the contribution);

 the amount of the contribution; and

 the election cycle year-to-date total of all contributions from the same individual. 

52 U.S.C. §30104(b)(3)(A) and 11 CFR §§100.12 and 104.3(a)(4)(i).

B. Best Efforts Ensure Compliance. When the treasurer of a political committee 

shows that the committee used best efforts (see below) to obtain, maintain, and 

submit the information required by the Act, the committee’s reports and records will 

be considered in compliance with the Act. 52 U.S.C. §30102(i) and 11 CFR

§104.7(a).

C. Definition of Best Efforts. The treasurer and the committee will be considered to 

have used “best efforts” if the committee satisfied all of the following criteria.

 All written solicitations for contributions included:

o a clear request for the contributor's full name, mailing address, occupation, 

and name of employer; and

o the statement that such reporting is required by Federal law.

 Within 30 days of receipt of the contribution, the treasurer made at least one effort 

to obtain the missing information, in either a written request or a documented oral 

request.

 The treasurer reported any contributor information that, although not initially 

provided by the contributor, was obtained in a follow-up communication or was 

contained in the committee’s records or in prior reports that the committee filed 

during the same two-year election cycle. 11 CFR §104.7(b).
9

Facts and Analysis

A. Facts

MBF did not disclose occupation and/or name of employer for contributions requiring 

itemization on its FEC reports, as of the date of the audit notification letter. 

Contribution Lacking Occupation and/or Name of Employer

Number of Contributions 180

Dollar Value of Contributions $160,880

Percent of Contributions 20%

1. Contributor Information Obtained but Amendments Not Filed:

MBF had the required contributor occupation and/or name of employer information, 

however MBF did not file the required amendments for the following:

Amendments Not Filed by Committee

Number of Contributions 633

Dollar Value of Contributions $52,100

2. Best Efforts Documentation Not Provided:

MBF did not provide the Audit staff records to document follow-up best efforts for the 

following:

Best Efforts Documentation Not Provided by Committee

Number of Contributions 117

Dollar Value of Contributions $108,780

3. Additional Information:

MBF disclosed the following on Schedule A (Itemized Receipts):

 “Information Requested” for 171 errors totaling $153,930, 

 Inadequate occupation and/or name of employer for six errors totaling $3,850, 

and

 No occupation and/or name of employer information for three errors totaling 

$3,100. 

MBF stated that “campaign staff would either call the contributor and explain the “best 

efforts” requirement to request and obtain the occupation and name of employer 

 

3 MBF’s database contained the occupation and name of employer information for 63 contributions totaling 

$52,100.
10

information, or would send letters explaining the requirements and requesting the 

information.”

B. Interim Audit Report and Audit Division Recommendation

The Audit staff provided schedules and discussed the disclosure of the contributors’ 

occupation and name of employer with MBF representatives both during the audit and at 

the exit conference. MBF representatives did not provide any comments at the time.

In response to the exit conference, MBF stated that it now emphasizes the timely sending 

of best efforts letters and the maintenance of records demonstrating its follow-up 

correspondence. MBF also provided the Audit staff copies of best efforts letters and a 

spreadsheet with the occupation and name of employer information it received. 

However, in response to the exit conference, amended disclosure reports were not filed. 

In response to the exit conference, MBF submitted the following:

Corrective Action Taken in Response to the Exit Conference

Number of Best Efforts Letters sent to Contributors-Untimely 117

Dollar Value of Best Efforts Letters sent to Contributors-Untimely $108,780

Number of Contributor Responses Received from Best Efforts 

Letters 100

Dollar Value of Contributor Responses from Best Efforts Letters $99,105

Dollar Value of Amendments filed $0

Dollar Value of Amendments Still Required to be filed with 

Best Efforts Information $151,2054

The Interim Audit Report recommended that MBF amend its report to disclose the 

occupation and name of employer information relating to the 163

5

contributions totaling 

$151,205 received from its contributors. 

C. Committee Response to Interim Audit Report

In response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF stated that it “...takes its 

compliance and reporting obligations very seriously”. MBF also reiterated that its new

compliance team is emphasizing the timely sending of best efforts letters and maintaining 

records to document written and oral follow-up correspondence. MBF included amended 

memo entries on Schedule A in its 2018 July Quarterly Report that disclosed the missing 

occupation and name of employer information, including the contributions noted above. 

 

4 $151,205 = $99,105 + $52,100 (see Section A.1).

5 163 = 63 +100.
11

Corrective Action Taken in Response to the Interim Audit Report

Number of Contributions 165

Dollar Value of Amendments filed $156,900

As such, MBF materially corrected the public record by amending the most recently filed 

disclosure report to include the missing occupation and name of employer information on 

Schedule A.

D. Draft Final Audit Report

The Draft Final Audit Report acknowledged that MBF materially corrected the public 

record by amending the disclosure report to include the missing occupation and name of 

employer information.

E. Committee Response to the Draft Final Audit Report

MBF’s response to the Draft Final Audit Report provided no additional comments.

Commission Conclusion

On December 6, 2018, the Commission considered the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum in which the Audit staff recommended the Commission find that MBF 

failed to disclose or inadequately disclosed occupation and name of employer 

information for 180 contributions from individuals totaling $160,880. 

The Commission approved the Audit staff’s recommendation.

Finding 3. Receipt of Contributions in Excess of the Limit

Summary

During audit fieldwork, the Audit staff reviewed contributions from individuals to 

determine if any exceeded the contribution limit. This review indicated that MBF 

received apparent excessive contributions totaling $100,350. These errors occurred as a 

result of MBF not resolving the excessive portions of contributions by forwarding 

presumptive redesignation or reattribution letters to its contributors, obtaining signed 

reattribution letters from its contributors, or issuing refunds of the excessive portions of 

contributions in a timely manner. In response to audit fieldwork and the exit conference, 

MBF untimely resolved excessive contributions from individuals totaling $88,150. In 

response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF provided two completed 

reattribution letters from the contributors and copies of four refund checks which 

untimely resolved the remaining excessive contributions. In response to the Draft Final 

Audit Report, MBF did not provide any additional comments. The Audit staff concluded 

that MBF received excessive contributions totaling $100,350, and they were resolved by 

MBF, albeit untimely.
12

The Commission approved a finding that MBF received excessive contributions totaling 

$100,350.

Legal Standard

A. Authorized Committee Limits. An authorized committee may not receive more 

than a total of $2,700 per election from any one person. 52 U.S.C §30116(a)(1); 11 

CFR §§110.1(a) and (b) and 110.9. 

B. Handling Contributions That Appear Excessive. If a committee receives a 

contribution that appears to be excessive, the committee must either:

 Return the questionable check to the donor; or

 Deposit the check into its federal account and:

 Keep enough money in the account to cover all potential refunds or 

establish a separate account in a campaign depository for such 

contributions;

 Keep a written record explaining why the contribution may be illegal;

 Include this explanation on Schedule A if the contribution has to be 

itemized before its legality is established;

 Seek a reattribution or a redesignation of the excessive portion, following 

the instructions provided in the Commission regulations (see below for 

explanations of reattribution and redesignation); and

 If the committee does not receive a proper reattribution or redesignation 

within 60 days after receiving the excessive contribution, refund the 

excessive portion to the donor. 11 CFR §§103.3(b)(3), (4) and (5) and 

110.1(k)(3)(ii)(B).

C. Joint Contributions. Any contribution made by more than one person, except for a 

contribution made by a partnership, must include the signature of each contributor on 

the check, money order, or other negotiable instrument or in a separate writing. A 

joint contribution is attributed equally to each donor unless a statement indicates that 

the funds should be divided differently. 11 CFR §110.1(k)(1) and (2).

D. Reattribution of Excessive Contributions. The Commission regulations permit 

committees to ask contributors of excessive contributions (or contributions that 

exceed the committee’s net debts outstanding) whether they had intended their 

contribution to be a joint contribution from more than one person and whether they 

would like to reattribute the excess amount to the other contributor. The committee 

must inform the contributor that:

 The reattribution must be signed by both contributors;

 The reattribution must be received by the committee within 60 days after the 

committee received the original contribution; and

 The contributor may instead request a refund of the excessive amount. 11 CFR 

§110.1(k)(3).

Within 60 days after receiving the excessive contribution, the committee must either 

receive the proper reattribution or refund the excessive portion to the donor. 11 CFR 
13

§§103.3(b)(3) and 110.1(k)(3)(ii)(B). Further, a political committee must retain 

written records concerning the reattribution in order for it to be effective. 11 CFR 

§110.1(l)(5). 

Notwithstanding the above, any excessive contribution that was made on a written 

instrument that is imprinted with the names of more than one individual may be 

attributed among the individuals listed unless instructed otherwise by the 

contributor(s). The committee must inform each contributor:

 How the contribution was attributed; and

 The contributor may instead request a refund of the excessive amount. 11 CFR 

§110.1(k)(3)(B).

E. Redesignation of Excessive Contributions. When an authorized candidate 

committee receives an excessive contribution (or a contribution that exceeds the 

committee’s net debts outstanding), the committee may ask the contributor to 

redesignate the excess portion of the contribution for use in another election. The 

committee must inform the contributor that:

 The redesignation must be signed by the contributor;

 The redesignation must be received by the committee within 60 days after the 

committee received the original contribution; and

 The contributor may instead request a refund of the excessive amount. 11 CFR 

§110.1(b)(5).

Within 60 days after receiving the excessive contribution, the committee must either 

receive the proper redesignation or refund the excessive portion to the donor. 11 CFR 

§§103.3(b)(3) and 110.1(b)(5)(ii)(A). Further, a political committee must retain 

written records concerning the redesignation in order for it to be effective. 11 CFR 

§110.1(l)(5). 

Presumptive Redesignation- When an individual makes an excessive contribution to a 

candidate’s authorized committee, the campaign may presumptively redesignate the 

excessive portion to the general election if the contribution:

 Is made before that candidate’s primary election;

 Is not designated in writing for a particular election;

 Would be excessive if treated as a primary election contribution; and

 As redesignated, does not cause the contributor to exceed any other contribution 

limit. 11 CFR §110.1(b)(5)(ii)(B)(1)-(4).

The committee is required to notify the contributor by any written method, including 

electronic mail, of the redesignation within 60 days of the treasurer’s receipt of the 

contribution, and must offer the contributor the option to receive a refund instead. 11 

CFR §110.1(b)(5)(ii)(B)(5) and (6).
14

Facts and Analysis

A. Facts

During audit fieldwork, the Audit staff reviewed contributions from individuals and 

identified apparent excessive contributions as noted below.

Excessive Contributions

Contributions from Individuals Errors $100,350

Total Amount of Excessive Contributions $100,350

Reasons for Excessive Contributions

Contributions not resolved via presumptive letter $82,550

Contributions not resolved with a signed 

reattribution letter or refund $17,800

Total Amount of Excessive Contributions $100,350

B. Additional Information

The errors totaling $82,550 were the result of MBF not resolving the excessive portion of 

contributions by timely forwarding a presumptive letter to its contributors informing 

them how their contribution had been redesignated or reattributed.

The errors totaling $17,800 were the result of MBF reattributing the excessive portion of 

contributions written on checks imprinted with a single account holder to another 

individual without a signed authorization from its contributors as required by 11 CFR 

110.1(k). These errors also included credit card contributions that exceeded the per 

election limit for individuals. MBF did not provide the Audit staff documentation 

supporting how it determined who to reattribute the excessive portion of the contribution.

MBF did not maintain a separate account for questionable contributions. However, MBF 

did maintain a sufficient balance in its bank accounts to make refunds of the apparent 

excessive contributions.

C. Interim Audit Report & Audit Division Recommendation

The Audit staff discussed this matter with MBF representatives during audit fieldwork as 

well as at the exit conference and provided a schedule of the apparent excessive 

contributions. MBF representatives did not provide any comments at the time.

In response to the audit fieldwork and the exit conference, MBF sent contributors 

redesignation and reattribution letters with an offer of a refund. However, MBF did not 

receive a signed reattribution from these contributors with excessive contributions 

totaling $12,200. MBF refunded one of the apparent excessive contributions totaling 
15

$2,500 and provided untimely signed reattribution letters for contributions totaling 

$3,100.

MBF also submitted untimely presumptive redesignation and reattribution letters that 

were sent to the contributors with excessive contributions totaling $82,550. It was noted 

that MBF believed it previously received timely authorizations from all the contributors 

to redesignate or reattribute the contributions. However, MBF did not provide the Audit 

staff with timely letters to support this statement. The Audit staff considered these 

contributions untimely resolved.

In response to audit fieldwork and the exit conference, MBF submitted the following

documentation:

Corrective Action Taken in Response to Audit Fieldwork and Exit Conference

Presumptive Letters Sent-Untimely $82,550

Contribution Refunded-Untimely $2,5006

Signed Reattribution Letters Submitted-Untimely $3,100

Amount of Excessive Contributions –Not Resolved $12,200

The Interim Audit Report recommended that MBF provide evidence which would 

demonstrate the unresolved excessive contributions in question, totaling $12,200, were 

timely resolved. Absent such demonstration, it was further recommended that MBF 

refund the contributions and provide evidence of such refunds or disgorge the funds to a 

governmental entity or to a qualified charitable organization.

D. Committee Response to Interim Audit Report

In response to the Interim Audit Report recommendation, MBF stated that it “...takes 

compliance and reporting obligations very seriously” and reiterated that it believes it had 

previously obtained timely authorizations from the contributors to redesignate or 

reattribute the excessive contributions. Of the remaining $12,200 excessive 

contributions, MBF provided the Audit staff with copies of two signed reattribution 

letters for $3,800 and copies of four refund checks for $8,400 of the excessive 

contributions. As such, all the excessive contributions were resolved by MBF, albeit 

untimely.

 

6 MBF provided a copy of the front of the refund check but did not provide evidence that this refund check 

was negotiated.
16

E. Draft Final Audit Report

The Draft Final Audit Report acknowledged that MBF untimely resolved all of the 

excessive contributions identified by the Audit staff.

F. Committee Response to the Draft Final Audit Report

MBF’s response to the Draft Final Audit Report provided no additional comments.

Commission Conclusion

On December 6, 2018, the Commission considered the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum in which the Audit staff recommended the Commission find that MBF 

received excessive contributions totaling $100,350. 

The Commission approved the Audit staff’s recommendation.