alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 264.50 What happens if, in a fiscal year, a State does not expend, with its own funds, an amount equal to the reduction to the adjusted SFAG resulting from a penalty? ( a ) ( 1 ) When we withhold Federal TANF funds from a State during a fiscal year because of other penalty actions listed at § 262.1 of this chapter, the State must replace these Federal TANF funds with State funds during the subsequent fiscal year.
( 2 ) If the State fails to replace funds during the subsequent year, then we will assess an additional penalty of no more than two percent of the adjusted SFAG during the year that follows the subsequent year.
( b ) A State must expend such replacement funds under its TANF program, not under “separate State programs.”
( c ) We will assess a penalty of no more than two percent of the adjusted SFAG plus the amount equal to the difference between the amount the State was required to expend and the amount it actually expended in the fiscal year. ( 1 ) We will assess the maximum penalty amount if the State made no additional expenditures to compensate for the reductions to its adjusted SFAG resulting from penalties.
( 2 ) We will reduce the percentage portion of the penalty if the State has expended some of the amount required. In such case, we will calculate the applicable percentage portion of the penalty by multiplying the percentage of the required expenditures that the State failed to make in the fiscal year by two percent.
( d ) The reasonable cause and corrective compliance plan provisions at §§ 262.5 and 262.6 of this chapter do not apply to this penalty.
§ 614.6 Meeting changes. ( a ) The time or place of a meeting of the National Science Board that has been publicly announced as provided in § 614.5 may subsequently be changed, but any such change will be publicly announced at the earliest practicable time.
( b ) The subject matter of any portion of any meeting of the Board that has been publicly announced as provided in § 614.5 or the determination whether any portion of any meeting so publicly announced will be open or closed may subsequently be changed, but only when: ( 1 ) The Board determines by record vote that agency business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible; and
( 2 ) The Board publicly announces the change and the vote of each Member on the change at the earliest practicable time.
#### § 73.5 Authority.

The policies and procedures contained herein are based on the authority of the Secretary of the Interior under title IV of the National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-515; 94 Stat. 3000; 16 U.S.C. 470a-1, a-2) which directs the Secretary to ensure and direct U.S. participation in the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, approved by the U.S. Senate on October 26, 1973, in cooperation with the Secretary of State, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Exhibit 32.2

HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC.

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer (since October 17, 2005) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 18, 2005





/s/ Pauline Schneider

Pauline Schneider

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer





















A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND WILL E RETAINED BY HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Craig Colmar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trans-India Acquisition Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                      |  |     |  |                            
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ CRAIG COLMAR           
|                      |  |     |  | Craig Colmar               
|                      |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Varsity Group Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Jack M Benson            
|                    |  | Jack M Benson                
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Submitted on record and briefs February 14,

affirmed June 26, 1996

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*ROBERT DALE ALEXANDER, *Appellant.*

(C931707CR; CA A84776)

918 P2d 867

Garrett A. Richardson filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Upton,*132 Or App 579, 889 P2d 376, *rev den*320 Or 749 (1995).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date: 

9 a.m. (EST), November 20, 2006. 

# Place: 

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Status: 

Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public. 

# Matters to Be Considered:

## Parts Open to the Public 

1. Approval of the minutes of the October 16, 2006 Board member meeting. 

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

3. Participant Survey Update. 

4. Analysis of Investment Funds Report. 

5. Pension Protection Act Report. 

6. 2007 Board Meeting Changes. 

7. DOL Audit Report. 

8. GAO Review of FRTIB Report. 

## Parts Closed to the Public 

9. Procurement 

10. Security 

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: November 6, 2006. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 06-9142 Filed 11-6-06; 12:24 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
RE: Interim Audit Report Response Due on Monday 10/27/14

‘ <7 Neil P. Reiff to: sdotzler@fec.gov, Lindy Karns 10/24/2014 04:48 PM
F 8 Ce: Charlotte Flanary, Dan Logsdon
History This message has been forwarded.

Scott, the Kentucky Democratic Party does not have any specific documents to supplement the
information it has already provided to the Commission. However, the committee has implemented
procedures to track and document, to the extent they are paid all, or in part with non-federal funds, that
those employees work 25% or less of their time in connection with federal elections and federal election
activities.

Neil P. Reiff

Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein & Birkenstock, P.C.
1025 Vermont Ave, NW

Suite 300

Washington, D.C. 20005
w. (202) 479 - 1111

f. (202) 479 - 1115

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or any employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by email. Thank you for your cooperation.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform
you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under
the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any

transaction or matter addressed herein.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1078]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & 
Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).
    Meeting Date and Time: Friday, March 9, 2007--1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Address: Emrick Technology Center, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, 
Easton, PA 18042.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to 
assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions 
in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and 
promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission 
reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor Commission was established by Pub. L. 100-692, November 18, 
1988 and extended through Pub. L. 105-355, November 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, 
Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 2750 Hugh 
Moore Park Road, Easton, PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
C. Allen Sachse,
Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1078 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
GEN. PURPOSE

SINGLE PHASE

GEN. PURPOSE

THREE PHASE

SEVERE

DUTY

EXPLOSION

PROOF

C-FACE SINGLE &

THREE PHASE

MULTI-SPEED

THREE PHASE

INVERTER

DUTY

VECTOR

DUTY

BRAKE

MOTORS

U FRAME

MOTORS

DIRECT CURRENT

(DC)

HVAC

MOTORS

14 ®www.emersonmotors.com

APPLICATIONS:

Designed for air compressors, pumps, conveyors, blowers and general industrial equipment.

203

FEATURES:

* Double Shielded Ball Bearings

* Class A or B Insulation, Continuous Duty, 40C Ambient

* F1 Assembly

* Reversible Rotation

Voltage List

Catalog

Frame Number

"C" Dim.

(inches)

Multiplier

Symbol

Ship Wt

HP RPM (lbs) Notes

C Face Footless

Full Load 

SF Amps

1/4 1800 115/230 56C D14C2PCR $186 DS-3F 1.35 9.9 22 4.8/2.4 25

1/3 1800 115/208-230 56C D13C2JCR $218 DS-3F 1.35 10.4 20 6.4/3.2 25

1800 115/230 56C D13CA2PCR $249 DS-3FMP 1.35 10.1 19 7.6/3.8 24

1/2 1800 115/208-230 56C D12C2JCR $256 DS-3F 1.25 10.4 20 8.2/4.1 25

1800 115/230 56C 6184 $293 DS-3FMP 1.25 11.0 20 8.4/4.2 24

1200 115/230 56C 6187 $502 DS-3FMP 1.25 12.3 35 10.4/5.2 25

3/4 1800 115/230 56C 6186 $355 DS-3FMP 1.25 10.8 26 12.4/6.2 24

1800 115/230 56C D34C2PCR $314 DS-3F 1.25 10.9 22 12.2/6.1 25

1200 115/230 56C 6189 $560 DS-3FMP 1.15 12.6 39 11.0/5.5 25

1 1800 115/230 56C D1C2PCR $341 DS-3F 1.25 11.6 22 16.4/8.2 25

1-1/2 1800 115/208-230 56C D32C2JCR $388 DS-3F 1.15 12.6 25 21.4/10.7 25

2 1800 115/230 182TC D2C2PC18R $612 DS-3SP 1.15 15.8 75 25.6/12.8 25

1800 115/230 56C D2C2PCR $509 DS-3FMP 1.15 13.1 40 21.4/10.7 25

3 1800 115/230 184TC D3C2PC18R $828 DS-3SP 1.15 17.8 72 33.0/16.5 25

Note 24

Note 25 Non-protected

Automatic Reset Thermal Overload Protector

General Purpose Single Phase

Open Dripproof (ODP)

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 30
#### § 670.21 Designation of native plants.

All plants whose normal range is limited to, or includes Antarctica are designated native plants, including:

Bryophytes

Freshwater algae

Fungi

Lichens

Vascular Plants

[63 FR 50164, Sept. 21, 1998, as amended at 86 FR 27988, May 25, 2021]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the Teimessee 

Democratic Party (TDP) 

A12-03 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on May 29,2014, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on the Teimessee Democratic Party, as recommended in the Memorandum from 

the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated May 19,2014. 

Conunissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

/ Date / Shelley E.G ^ 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Commission
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Power Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ian Edmonds, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A signed
 original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
 be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
 request.

Dated: September 22, 2010

|                                             | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Ian
 Edmonds                             | 
|                                             | 
|Ian Edmonds                                  | 
|President, Chief Executive
 Officer and      | 
|Interim Chief Financial
 Officer             | 
|(Principal
 Executive and Financial Officer) | 

---
June 30 , 2015

Mr. J ason Gadrim

19733 State Route 278 SW

Nelsonville, OH 45764

Dear Mr. Gadrim :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we c an not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 25 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0763 ),

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the ex emption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your req uest any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1466

MONIQUE R. SMALL DREW , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. ( 3:17

- cv
- 00429

- JAG )

Submitted : July 19 , 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Monique R. Small Drew , Appellant Pro Se. George William Norris, Jr., General Counsel’s Office, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not b inding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Monique R. Small Drew appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction the amended civil complaint in which Drew alleged violations
of the Americans with Disabilities Act. * See 42 U.S. C. §§ 12101

- 12213 (2012)

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Drew v. VCU, Parking & Transp. , No. 3:17

- cv
00429

- JAG (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Drew initially filed suit in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia, and Defendant timely removed this matter to federal court.