alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of New Predoctoral Fellowship Application(s).                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey M. Chernak, Phd., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing Research/NIH, 6701 Democracy Plaza, Suite 712, MSC 4870, Bethesda, MD 20817. (301) 402-6959.                         *chernak@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Prodoctoral Fellowship Application(s).                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey M. Chernak, Phd., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing Research/NIH, 6701 Democracy Plaza, Suite 712, MSC 4870, Bethesda, MD 20817. (301) 402-6959.                         *chernak@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 27, 2006.

David Clary,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9484 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document

Exhibit 10.1


SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE SUCH TERMS ARE NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. SUCH TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH [*]


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO GOOGLE SERVICES AGREEMENT


This Amendment Number One to the Google Services Agreement (“Amendment”), effective as of June 1, 2020 (“Amendment Effective Date”), is between Google LLC (“Google”) and Synacor, Inc. (“Company”) and amends the Google Services Agreement that has an effective date of June 1, 2018 (the “Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings given to those terms in the Agreement.  The parties agree as follows:


1.   Renewal Term. The “Term” as set forth on the cover page of the Agreement is extended to continue through May 31, 2021 (inclusive).


2.   Image Search Service Removed. Effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, and for the remainder of the Term: [*] (c) all references to the IS Search Service will be deemed deleted from the Agreement [*].


3.   [*] Co-Branded Site. Section 2.4 is deleted in its entirety.


4.   General. The parties may execute this Amendment in counterparts, including facsimile, PDF, or other electronic copies, which taken together will constitute one instrument.  Except as expressly modified herein, the terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment by persons duly authorized.


															
	GOOGLE			Synacor, Inc.	
	 				
	By:	 /s/ Philipp Schindler		By:	/s/ Timothy J. Heasley
	Name: 	Philipp Schindler		Name:	Timothy J. Heasley
	Title:	Authorized Signatory		Title:	Chief Financial Officer
	Date:	May 27, 2020		Date:	May 27, 2020
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. 
**Title:****Shasta Lake boating safety: Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National RecreationArea, Shasta-Trinity National Forest, California
 
2006 | 2021
 
SuDoc Number: A 13.28:SH 2/14
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000847938

 
March 26, 2024**
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A)
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I,

I, Tsippy Moldovan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on 10-QSB of Defense Industries
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

/S/ Tsippy Moldovan*
-----------------------
Tsippy Moldovan
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) A13-19 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the ) 

TeaPartyExpress.org ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on January 06,2017, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

TeaPartyExpress.org, as recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated December 20,2016. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest; 

/Date Dayna C. Brown 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Commission
1 District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

2 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee,

versus ALONZO RICHARD, Petitioner-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-1531-H

- - - - - - - - - - August 16, 1996 Before DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and FALLON, 1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM: 2 Alonzo Richard has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Richard's affidavit filed in support of his IFP application is sufficient to demonstrate that he is economically3 Richard has also filed a “Motion for Determination of

Status” alleging for the first time that the indictment was fatally defective. Richard has not shown plain error as the indictment refers to and tracks the language of the statute that Richard was convicted of violating. See United States v. Armstrong , 951 F.2d 626, 628 (5th Cir. 1992); Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). Richard’s motion is DENIED. eligible to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Because Richard raises arguable points on appeal, we grant his in forma pauperis application. Richard contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in that he conceded Richard’s guilt on two counts in his closing argument. It was a reasonable trial strategy for counsel to concede Richard’s guilt on the counts for which the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming in order to successfully challenge the other charges. United States v. Wilks , 46 F.3d 640, 641 (7th Cir. 1995); United States v. Tabares , 951 F.2d 405, 409 (1st Cir. 1991). Richard also contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the trial court’s jury instruction concerning the elements of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). The record indicates that the trial court’s instruction tracked the language of the statute and the indictment. Richard’s counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim. Mendiola v. Estelle , 635 F.2d 487, 491 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981). 3 For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
SERVED: October 10, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to January 2015. 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in effect. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 

9, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Todd Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

444 S. River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

160 1 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1983 

Adjourned November 18, 1983 

Convened January 23, 1984 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, March 1, 1984 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar. 8, 1983-- Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B., 95-1) was def eated--Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B. Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably, by Mr. Percy, 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations, with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

reoort--Ex. Reot. 98-1} 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

* 445 630-13 Donna F. Tuttle, of California, to be Under Jan 30, 84 Mr. Packwood, 

Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Committee on Commerce, 

Tourism. vice Peter McCoy, resigned, to Science, and 

which position she was appointed during Transportation, without 

the last recess of the Senate. printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 468 633 William A. Wilson, of California, to be Feb 27, 84 Mr. Percy, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of Relations, with printed 

America to the Holv See. renort - Ex.Rept. 98-21. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 
2 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE FOREIGN SERVICE 

Foreign Service nominations beginning Philip Birnbaum, and ending Ronald Allen Witherell, 

which nominat1ons were received by the Senate and appeared m the Congressional Record of January 

30, 1984.
#### § 410.1704 Treatment of an individual whom ORR has determined to be an adult.

If the procedures in this subpart would result in ORR reasonably concluding that an individual is an adult, despite the individual's claim to be under the age of 18, ORR shall treat such person as an adult for all purposes.
#### § 910.59 Development parcel.

*Development parcel* means an area of land established by the Corporation to be a minimum site on which a *development* may occur under *the Plan* and any applicable *Square Guidelines* adopted by the Corporation. A *development parcel* does not need to be under the ownership of a single individual or entity. A proposal for a *development parcel* may be formulated by any number of individuals or entities, so long as it accommodates the needs and requirements of affirmative action, historic preservation and other policies of the Corporation, and at the same time responds to the goals of comprehensive planning and design for that particular *coordinated planning area.*
#### § 1610.1 Purpose.

This part is designed to implement restrictions and requirements on the use of non-LSC funds by LSC recipients and to set requirements for each LSC recipient to maintain program integrity with respect to any organization that engages in LSC-restricted activities.
#### § 260.10 What does this part cover?

This part includes regulatory provisions that generally apply to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRANDON JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

REGAN LEIGH JOHNSON,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00162

- CV

Appeal from

29th District Court

of Palo Pinto County, Texas

(TC # 44,689

- C)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brandon Johnson is appealing from an order denying his motion to modify the parent

- child

relationship. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In an ordinary civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the

judgment or appealable order is signed, or within 90 days if any par ty timely files a motion for

new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate under T EX .R.C IV .P. 165a, or makes

a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.1(a). The appellate court

may extend the time to file the notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after the deadline passes, the

appellant files (1) the notice of appeal in the trial court and (2) a motion for extension of time

complying with Rule 10.5(b). T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.3; see T EX .R.A PP .P. 10.5(b); Verburgt v . Dorner

,

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). If the notice of appeal is untimely, the appellate court lacks- 2

-

jurisdiction and must dismiss the case. See Charette v. Fitzgerald , 213 S.W.3d 505, 509

(Tex.App.

-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

The trial co urt signed the order denying Appellant’s motion to modify on February 23,

2017. More than a year later, Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 13, 2019. The Clerk of

the Court sent Appellant notice that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for l ack of

jurisdiction. Appellant did not file any response. We dismiss the attempted appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.

August 14, 2019

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
§ 286.85 How will we calculate the work participation rates? ( a ) Work participation rate(s) will be the percentage of families with an adult or minor head-of-household receiving TANF assistance from the Tribe who are participating in a work activity approved in the TFAP for at least the minimum number of hours approved in the TFAP.
( b ) The participation rate for a fiscal year is the average of the Tribe's participation rate for each month in the fiscal year.
( c ) A Tribe's participation rate for a month is expressed as the following ratio: ( 1 ) The number of families receiving TANF assistance that include an adult or a minor head-of-household who is participating in activities for the month (numerator), divided by
( 2 ) The number of families that include an adult or a minor head-of-household receiving TANF assistance during the month excluding: ( i ) Families that were penalized for non-compliance with the work requirements in that month as long as they have not been sanctioned for more than three months (whether or not consecutively) out of the last 12 months; and
( ii ) Families with children under age one, if the Tribe chooses to exempt these families from participation requirements.
( d ) If a family receives assistance for only part of a month or begins participating in activities during the month, the Tribe may count it as a month of participation if an adult or minor head-of-household in the family is participating for the minimum average number of hours in each full week that the family receives assistance or participates in that month.
( e ) Two-parent families in which one of the parents is disabled are considered one-parent families for the purpose of calculating a Tribe's participation rate.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Robert McMullan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofConexant Systems, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Conexant Systems,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis Quarterly Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this Quarterly Report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on suchevaluation; and c. disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: May 17, 2004
/s/ Robert McMullanRobert McMullan