alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1633 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1633

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize a member of the 
  Armed Forces to designate anyone as the person authorized to direct 
 disposition of the remains of the member if the member dies while on 
                              active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

 Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. Watson, and 
   Ms. Moore of Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize a member of the 
  Armed Forces to designate anyone as the person authorized to direct 
 disposition of the remains of the member if the member dies while on 
                              active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honor the Written Intent of our 
Soldier Heroes Act'' or ``Honor the WISH Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO DIRECT DISPOSITION OF 
              REMAINS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Only the'' in the matter preceding 
        paragraph (1) and inserting ``The'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
        paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively;
            (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``clauses (1)-(3)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (1) through 
        (4)''; and
            (4) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, 
        the following new paragraph:
            ``(1) The person identified by the decedent on the record 
        of emergency data maintained by the Secretary concerned (DD 
        Form 93 or any successor to that form), as the Person 
        Authorized to Direct Disposition (PADD), regardless of the 
        relationship of the designee to the decedent.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT, BALANCE SHEET AND CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068874
<NAME> IMPLANT SCIENCES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,123,723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  756,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,602
<INVENTORY>                                    200,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,292,720
<PP&E>                                       4,617,380
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,200,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,990,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          874,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       580,627
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,129,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,990,897
<SALES>                                        854,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               854,405
<CGS>                                        1,790,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,790,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (878,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (878,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (878,606)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
          10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
          report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-15 (the
          "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
          reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
          asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
          accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
          13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
          except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
          of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
          this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
     Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2007


     /s/ Steve Bailey
     -----------------------------
     Steve Bailey
     Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Applications Work Order Collaboration (AWOC)

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 7, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Applications Work Order 
Collaboration (``AWOC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) The identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs 
to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology North 
America, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC, Troy, MI; 
Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, MI; Mark IV, IVHS, Inc., Flemington, NJ; 
NAVTEQ North America, LLC, Chicago, IL; and Raytheon Co., Fullerton, 
CA. The general area of AWOC's planned activity is the development of 
specified applications to be integrated into the vehicle infrastructure 
integration system, a national infrastructure to enable data collection 
and exchange in real time between vehicles and vehicles and the 
roadway.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9910 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11--M
CHASE


                        SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


RE: CMLTI 2006-HE2: The Pooling and Servicing Agreement by and among JPMorgan
      Chase Bank, NA c/o CHF LLC as Servicer, Citibank, N.A. as Trustee
      Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer, Citigroup Mortgage
      Loan Trust Inc. as Depositor, Citibank West, FSB as Custodian, U.S. Bank
      National Association as Trustee, Ameriquest Mortgage Company as Servicer
      (the "Agreement")


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as Servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the CMLTI 2006-HE2
(The"Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

             (1)   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
calendar year ending December 31, 2006 and of the performance of the Servicer
under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

             (2)   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such year.


Date: 02/28/2007
                                             JPMorgan Chase Bank,
                                             National Association,
                                             As Servicer

                                             By:/s/ David Lowman
                                             ---------------------
                                             Name: David Lowman
                                             Title: Executive Vice President
[Civ. No. 11461.

First Appellate District, Division One.

November 27, 1940.]

#### WESLEY KING, Appellant, v. GUARANTY BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION (a Corporation), Respondent.

Raymond Perry for Appellant.

Urban A. Sontheimer, Vernon E. Perren and John L. Reith for Respondent.

STURTEVANT, J.

This is a companion case to *King*v. *San Jose Pacific Building and Loan Association,*this day filed *(ante,*p. 705 [107 Pac. (2d) 442]). The pleadings, evidence, and findings are' practically the same. On the authority of the case above mentioned the ruling should be the same.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Spence, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on January 23, 1941.
From: Val Tillstrom | 

Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 10:51 AM 

To: Scott W. Dotzler 

Subject: Re: Interim Audit Report for Mike Bishop for Congress 

Thank you for the interim report. 

The Committee has no foiiual response at this time. 

Sincerely, 

Val Tillstrom, Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

TED CRUZ FOR SENATE et al., ) 

 ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No. 19-cv-908 (NJR, APM, TJK) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

ORDER 

 For the reasons set forth in the court’s Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 71, the court grants 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary 

Judgment. It is further ordered that Plaintiffs’ regulatory claims, previously held in abeyance, are 

dismissed as moot. 

This is a final, appealable Order. 

Dated: June 3, 2021 /s/ 

 Neomi J. Rao 

 United States Circuit Court Judge 

 /s/ 

 Amit P. Mehta 

 United States District Court Judge 

 /s/ 

 Timothy J. Kelly 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 1:19-cv-00908-APM-TJK-NJR Document 72 Filed 06/03/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY )

AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, )

 ) 

NOAH BOOKBINDER ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 18-1060 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION )

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

 On May 4, 2018, Plaintiffs filed the above-captioned matter seeking a declaration that the 

Federal Election Commission’s failure to act on Plaintiffs’ complaint against TH Holdings, LLC, 

Marvin C. Schwartz, Heather Oaks, LLC, Right to Rise USA, and its treasurer, Charles R. Spies 

for violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act was contrary to law. The suit further sought 

an order requiring the Commission to act on the complaint. On May 8, 2018, the Federal 

Election Commission acted with respect to Plaintiffs’ administrative complaint. Accordingly, 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs file this Notice 

of Voluntary Dismissal in the above-captioned matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

_/s/ Stuart McPhail_______________ 

Stuart McPhail (D.C. Bar No. 1032529) 

Adam J. Rappaport (D.C. Bar No. 479866) 

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics 

 in Washington 

455 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. 

Washington, DC 20001 

Phone: (202) 408-5565 

Fax: (202) 897-1996 

smcphail@citizensforethics.org

Case 1:18-cv-01060-APM Document 4 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on July 6, 2018, I caused the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to be served by 

filing the same with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system. I certify that I caused the same to be mailed via USPS first class mail to the 

following party: 

 Federal Election Commission 

 1050 First St., NE 

 Washington, DC 20463 

Laura C. Beckerman____________ 

Laura C. Beckerman 

Case 1:18-cv-01060-APM Document 4 Filed 07/06/18 Page 2 of 2
HOME ABOUT US NEWS PUBLICATIONS

Fishery Biology and Stock Assessment Division

Fishery Biology and Stock Assessment studies are based on biological observations collec

field surveys with a variety of sampling gears, laboratory studies of biological specimens

data from tag and recapture experiments (conventional, archival, and pop-up archival t

are all utilized). We provide the fundamental biological and ecological research on Fede

managed species to allow for improved understanding of the mechanisms that

resource distribution and abundance.

 Age and growth

 Tagging (Satellite pop-up archival tags, archival tags, and conventional

 Diet and food web modeling

 Reproduction and fecundity

 Essential Fish Habitat needs and threats

We study a variety of species including tunas, swordfish, billfish, mahimahi (dolphin fish

sharks, bottomfish, and crustaceans.

Library | Outreach | Partners | Contact Us | Employment | Facilities

Organization Chart | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Information Quality

NMFS | NOAA | U.S. Department of Commerce | USA.gov

http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov Last updated October 18 2

NOAA PIFSC - Fishery Biology and Stock Assessment Page 1 of 1

http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/fbsad/index.php 3/7/2011
#### § 264.83 How will we know if a Territory failed to meet the Matching Grant funding requirements at § 264.80?

We will require the Territories to report the expenditures required by § 264.80(a)(2) and (a)(3) on the quarterly Territorial Financial Report.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.§1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of EnteroMedics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg S. Lea, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

March 29,2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CDRJ
INVESTMENTS (LUX) S.A. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS THEN ENDED INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,967
<INVENTORY>                                     35,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,535
<PP&E>                                          56,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,267
<BONDS>                                        123,330
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,661
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,477
<SALES>                                        148,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,579
<CGS>                                           34,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                285
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (315)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (30)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:10 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Subject: Redlined version of Tier 3 FRM RIA EO12866 2060-AQ86

Attachments: EO12866_Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM RIA_20140225.pdf

Part 2 of my earlier message: here is the redlined RIA.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GARY MALONE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2443

[August 31, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit; Broward County, Bernard I. Bober,

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 99-1540 CF10A, 99-7354 CF10A and 00-7708 

CF10A.

Gary Malone, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 309.10 Who is eligible to apply for and receive Federal funding to operate a Tribal IV-D program? The following Tribes or Tribal organizations are eligible to apply to receive Federal funding to operate a Tribal IV-D program meeting the requirements of this part: ( a ) An Indian Tribe with at least 100 children under the age of majority as defined by Tribal law or code, in the population subject to the jurisdiction of the Tribal court or administrative agency.
( b ) A Tribal organization that has been designated by two or more Indian Tribes to operate a Tribal IV-D program on their behalf, with a total of at least 100 children under the age of majority as defined by Tribal laws or codes, in the population of the Tribes subject to the jurisdiction of the Tribal court (or courts) or administrative agency (or agencies).
( c ) A Tribe or Tribal organization that can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary the capacity to operate a child support enforcement program and provide justification for operating a program with less than the minimum number of children may be granted a waiver of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section as appropriate. ( 1 ) A Tribe or Tribal organization's request for waiver of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must include documentation sufficient to demonstrate that meeting the requirement is not necessary. Such documentation must state: ( i ) That the Tribe or Tribal organization otherwise complies with the requirements established in subpart C of these regulations;
( ii ) That the Tribe or Tribal organization has the administrative capacity to support operation of a child support program under the requirements of this part;
( iii ) That the Tribal IV-D program will be cost effective; and
( iv ) The number of children under the jurisdiction of the Tribe or Tribal organization.
( 2 ) A Tribe or Tribal organization's request for a waiver may be approved if the Tribe or Tribal organization demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that it can provide the services required under 45 CFR part 309 in a cost effective manner even though the population subject to Tribal jurisdiction includes fewer than 100 children.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00430

- CV

PHILLIP VALLEJO AND BRENDA

VALLEJO APPELLANTS

AND APPELLEES

V.

CITY OF KENNEDALE APPELLEE

AND APPELLANT

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNT Y

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “ Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal And

Cross Appeal .” It is the court = s opinion that the motion should be granted;

therefore, we dismiss the appeal s

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Costs of the appeal s shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: May 12 , 2011
#### § 2556.210 Who reviews and approves an application for VISTA service?

AmeriCorps has the final authority to approve or deny applications for VISTA service.