alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Schradin, as Administrator of the Estate of Hermann Schradin, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant

(Submitted January 4, 1909;

decided January 29, 1909.)

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 194 N. Y. 534.)

Motion granted and remittitur amended so as to read as follows: Judgment affirmed, with costs; the court holding the statute of the state of New York on which defendant’s liability is predicated is in conflict neither with any provision of the Constitution of this state nor with any provision of the Constitution of the United States; that the classification as made in that statute is a reasonable one and that the statute is, therefore, valid and effectual.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3799

___________

DeAngelo Lamont Thomas, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Alford Northern; Gary Rusher; Ray *

Hopper; Stephan Clark; Danny * [UNPUBLISHED]

Kirkman; Jonathan Rice; Robert *

Hooper; Missouri Department of *

Corrections, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 22, 2010

Filed: June 30, 2010

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this pro se appeal, Missouri inmate DeAngelo Lamont Thomas challenges

the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit

alleging that the use of pepper spray on him amounted to excessive force. Having

carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Nelson v. Shuffman, 603 F.3d 439, 445

1

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri. 
(8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that the one-time

use of pepper spray in these circumstances--Thomas was refusing orders to stop

behavior that was deemed to present a security risk--did not violate the Eighth

Amendment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R.

47B; and we deny Thomas’s petition for a writ of prohibition. 

______________________________

-2-
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-EIGHTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { 

Convened January 3, 1983 

Adjourned November 18, 1983 

Convened January 23, 1984 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, February 1, 1984 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WILLIAM F. HILDENBRAND, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Mar. 8, 1983-- Motion entered to reconsider the vote by which the resolution of 

ratification to the Montreal Protocols No. 3 and 4 (Ex. B.. 95-1) was defeated-Mr. 

Baker. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B. Montreal Aviation Protocols Nos. 3 and 4 Feb 10 83 Reported 

95-1 favorably, by Mr. Percy. 

Committee on Foreign 

Relations. with a proposed 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

with conditions (Printed 

rennrt-Ex. Rent 98-1) 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee. Office. And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

• 445 630-13 Donna F. Tuttle. of California. to be Under Jan 30. 84 Mr. Packwood • 

Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Committee on Commerce. 

Tourism, vice Peter McCoy, resigned. to Science, and 

which position she was appointed during Transportation. without 

the last recess of the Senate. printed report 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

446 627 William H. Taft. IV, of Virginia, to be Jan 31, 84 Mr. Warner. 

Deputy Secretary of Defense, vice W. Paul Committee on Armed 

Thayer, resigned. Services, without printed 

reno rt. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 
2 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE AIR FORCE 

Air Force nominations beginning Paul W. Bishop, and ending Jacquelyn D. Reid, which 

nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of November 18, 

1983.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Wesley B. Mendoza

WM Aerial Innovations

6100 Rocky Canyon Road

Atascadero, CA 93422

Re: FAA–2015–4843

Dear Mr. Mendoza:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Reconunendation 

Memorandum on the Oakland County 

Democratic Party (OCDP) 

A12-02) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission open meeting 

on May 21,201S, do hereby certify that the Conunission decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the 

Audit Division Memorandum on the Oakland County Democratic Party (OCDP) (A12-02) as set 

forth in Agenda Document No. 1S-20-A. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, WalOier, and Weintraub'voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

f Date Shelley E. GaxO 

Deputy Secretary of the Conunission
§ 154.200 Rate increases subject to review. ( a ) A rate increase filed in a State, or effective in a State that does not require a rate increase to be filed, is subject to review if: ( 1 ) The rate increase is 15 percent or more applicable to a 12-month period that begins on January 1, as calculated under paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) The rate increase meets or exceeds a State-specific threshold applicable to a 12-month period that begins on January 1, as calculated under paragraph (b) of this section, determined by the Secretary. A State-specific threshold shall be based on factors impacting rate increases in a State to the extent that the data relating to such State-specific factors are available by August 1 of the preceding year. States interested in proposing a State-specific threshold greater than the Federal default stated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are required to submit a proposal for approval of such threshold to the Secretary by August 1 of the preceding year, in the form and manner specified by the Secretary.
( b ) A rate increase meets or exceeds the applicable threshold set forth in paragraph (a) of this section if the average increase, including premium rating factors described in § 147.102 of this subchapter, for all enrollees weighted by premium volume for any plan within the product meets or exceeds the applicable threshold.
( c ) If a rate increase that does not otherwise meet or exceed the threshold under paragraph (b) of this section meets or exceeds the threshold when combined with a previous increase or increases during the 12-month period preceding the date on which the rate increase would become effective, then the rate increase must be considered to meet or exceed the threshold and is subject to review under § 154.210, and such review shall include a review of the aggregate rate increases during the applicable 12-month period.
[83 FR 17060, Apr. 17, 2018]
EXHIBIT 35.2
                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
               RFMSI SERIES 2006-SA2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that: 1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered
by the Issuing  Entity's  report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's  performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.
2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:        /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        ----------------------------
        Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
        Title: Executive Vice President
Exhibit 4.1

                            CORONADO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      16929 E. Enterprise Drive, Suite 202
                            Fountain Hills, AZ 85268


                                January 16, 2001


Coronado Employees and Consultants,

     The  Company's  Board of  Directors  has decided to make  available  to all
employees and consultants,  shares of the Company's common stock at the price of
90% of the lowest  closing  bid price  during  the week prior to the  employee's
payday.

     To participate  in this program,  all you have to do is execute this letter
in the space below,  and indicate the amount of wages you wish to have allocated
to this Plan and the pay period from which your salary  will be  credited.  Your
free-trading shares will be delivered to you within a few days.


                                        Coronado Industries, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Gary R. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary R. Smith, President



     --------------------------             --------------------------
     Amount of Wages                        Employee Signature


     --------------------------             --------------------------
     Pay Period From                        Name of Employee
     Which To Be Paid                       (Please Print)
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
           HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HSA4 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Executive Vice President
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Access to EducationChildrenEducational DiscriminationEducational OpportunitiesElementary Secondary EducationEnglish Only MovementEqual EducationLanguage AttitudesLanguage MinoritiesOfficial LanguagesPolitics of Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
July 7, 2009 Contact: Melissa Cohlmia 

 Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC 

 316-828-3756 

 melissa.cohlmia@kochps.com

Koch Industries Welcomes 2009 Leadership Kansas Class 

WICHITA, KAN.—Kansas business leaders, educators and policy makers gathered June 26 for a 

Leadership Kansas presentation on Koch Industries, Inc. at the company’s Wichita campus. 

This was the second consecutive year Koch Industries has hosted a Leadership Kansas presentation in 

Wichita. More than 40 participants attended the session, which included breakfast, history and business 

overview of Koch companies and a presentation on Market-Based Management® (MBM®). 

Koch Industries is the second largest private company in America, according to Forbes magazine. 

“Appreciating Market-Based Management is easier once you understand the history and success of 

Koch Industries,” said John Federico, executive director of Leadership Kansas. “This presentation 

helped us all see not just what Koch Industries does, but why the company is so successful.” 

Rod Learned, director of internal communication for Koch companies, explained that although Koch 

Industries has its historic roots in the refining industry, it is now active across a broad range of industry 

areas, including forest and consumer products; polymers and fibers; minerals; fertilizers; pipelines; 

process and pollution control equipment and technologies; ranching; and commodity and financial 

trading, in addition to refining. Koch Industries has a presence in nearly 60 countries and about 70,000 

employees. 

MBM, developed by Koch Industries’ chairman of the board and CEO, Charles Koch, throughout the 

past 40 years, is a holistic approach to management that integrates theory and practice and prepares 

organizations to deal successfully with the challenges of growth and change. MBM enables 

organizations to apply the principles that allow free societies to prosper. Under the leadership of 

Charles Koch and through the rigorous and holistic application of his management philosophy, Koch 

Industries has been transformed into one of the most successful companies in the world. 

Tony Woodlief, MBM consultant, explained the company’s guiding principles, which include integrity, 

compliance, value creation, Principled EntrepreneurshipTM, customer focus and humility. 

“We were happy to have an opportunity to host this year’s Leadership Kansas group. It is always a 

pleasure to share information about our company,” said Mark Nichols, Koch companies’ regional 

manager for government affairs. 

Based in Wichita, Koch Industries, Inc. (www.kochind.com) owns a diverse group of companies involved in 

refining and chemicals; process and pollution control equipment and technologies; minerals; fertilizers; fibers and 

polymers; commodity and financial trading and services; and forest and consumer products. With approximately 

$100 billion in revenues, 70,000 employees and a presence in nearly 60 countries, Koch Industries is one of the 

largest private companies in America according to Forbes magazine.

###
#### § 1706.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
UAS#: Date Issue Discovered Date Issue Addressed Issue Description & Maintenance Conducted Maintenance Performed By: Software Updates Airframe Engines Propellers Camera Gimbal Landing Gear Vibration Dampening Other:
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of TCP Capital Corp. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul L. Davis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|                     |                                     
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                     | /S/ Paul L. Davis                   
|Name:
        Title: | Paul
L. DavisChief
Financial Officer



Date: March 7, 2013
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In tiie Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Biden ) Agenda Document No. 10-73-A 

for President, Inc. 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recordmg secretary for the Federal Election Commission 

open meeting on December 02,2010, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 

6-0 to approve Agenda Document No. 10-73-A, which is entitled Proposed Final Audit Report 

on Biden for President, Inc. and according to the Commission's Directive would be changed to 

the Commission's Final Audit Report on Biden for President, Inc., and authorize the Audit 

Division to make any technical and conforming changes. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther and Wemtraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

~ Date ^ Shavsm Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
§ 1623.6 Interim funding. ( a ) Pending the completion of suspension proceedings under this part, the Corporation shall provide the recipient with the level of financial assistance provided for under its current grant or contract with the Corporation.
( b ) Funds withheld pursuant to a suspension shall be released to the recipient at the end of the suspension period.
§ 2553.107 What must a sponsor do if it cannot meet its performance measures? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
When a sponsor finds it is not on track to meet its performance measures, the sponsor must develop a plan to get back on track or submit a request to CNCS to amend its performance measures. CNCS may limit when amendments to performance measure can be submitted, as well as limit the types of changes a sponsor can make to performance measures. The request must include all of the following: ( a ) Why the project is not on track to meet its performance requirements;
( b ) How the project has been tracking performance measures;
( c ) Evidence of corrective steps taken;
( d ) Any new proposed performance measures; and
( e ) A plan to ensure that the project will meet the new proposed measure(s).
[76 FR 20247, Apr. 12, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 64658, Dec. 17, 2018]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5045-N-52]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         December 29, 2006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: December 21, 2006.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 06-9879 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raymond L. Goldsmith, Chief Executive Officer of FNDS3000 Corp, (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended August 31, 2010 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Raymond L. GoldsmithName:

Raymond L. GoldsmithTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:

November 29, 2010