alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chao Ming Zhao, the Chief Executive Officer of
CHINA BIOLOGIC PRODUCTS, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 23rd day of March, 2010.

| |  |  | /s/
      Chao Ming Zhao     
| |  |  | -----------------------------
| |  |  | Chao Ming Zhao               
| |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
| |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Biologic Products, Inc. and will be retained by
China Biologic Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
SCAP-22-0000552

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STEPHEN P.H. WONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF HARBOR SQUARE, by and through its Board of Directors, Defendant-Appellee,

and

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF HARBOR SQUARE, by and through its Board of Directors, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA, LLP (fka Porter Tom Quitiquit Chee &
Watts), and EKIMOTO & MORRIS, ALLLC, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-22-0000552; CASE NO. 1CCV-19-0002324)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna and Eddins

, JJ. , Circuit Judge Wong and Circuit Judge Somerville

, assigned by reason of vacancies)

Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion for

reconsideration, Defendant-Appellee’s response, and the record

and files herein, Electronically Filed Supreme Court

SCAP-22-0000552

25-MAR-2024

12:54 PM

Dkt. 38 ODMR2 I t is ordered that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i

, March 25 , 202 4

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwal d

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Paul B.K. Wong

/s/ Rowena A. Somerville
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1592 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1592

To amend title 37, United States Code, to guarantee a pay increase for 
members of the uniformed services for fiscal years 2011 through 2014 of 
one-half of one percentage point higher than the Employment Cost Index.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 37, United States Code, to guarantee a pay increase for 
members of the uniformed services for fiscal years 2011 through 2014 of 
one-half of one percentage point higher than the Employment Cost Index.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GUARANTEED PAY INCREASE FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES OF 
              ONE-HALF OF ONE PERCENTAGE POINT HIGHER THAN EMPLOYMENT 
              COST INDEX.

    Section 1009(c)(2) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006'' and inserting ``fiscal 
years 2011 through 2014''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2105.33 Will you receive notification of activities involving the submitter? If any of the following occur, the Agency will notify you: ( a ) The Agency provides the submitter with notice and an opportunity to object to disclosure;
( b ) The Agency notifies the submitter of its intent to disclose the requested information; or
( c ) A submitter files a lawsuit to prevent the disclosure of the information.
#### § 2540.500 What definition applies to this subpart?

*National Service Insignia.* For this subpart, *national service insignia* means the former and current seal, logos, names, or symbols of the Corporation's programs, products, or services, including those for AmeriCorps, VISTA, Learn and Serve America, Senior Corps, Foster Grandparents, the Senior Companion Program, the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, the National Civilian Community Corps, and any other program or project that the Corporation administers.
** **

**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

 

INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

5310 HARVEST HILL ROAD, SUITE 275

DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 - 5805

(972) 788-1110  Telefax 991-3160

E-Mail:  forgarb@forgarb.com

 

March 31, 2011

 

Reef Global Energy VIII, L.P.

1901 N. Central Expy Suite 300

Richardson TX 75080

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS**

 

Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name, to references to our name, and to the inclusion of information taken from our “Estimated Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 2011 Attributable to Interests Owned By Reef Global Energy VIII, L.P. In Certain Properties Located in Louisiana, New Mexico, and Texas”, under the section “Item 2 Properties — Proved Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserves”. We also consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated February 15, 2011 and summary reserve information in the Annual report on Form 10-K of Reef Global Energy VIII, L.P. as Exhibit 99.1.

 

 
|   | Yours   truly,                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   | /s/   Forrest A. Garb & Associates, Inc. |
|   | Forrest   A. Garb & Associates, Inc.     |
|   | Texas   Registered Engineering Firm F-629              |
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   | /s/   W. D. Harris III                                 |
|   | W.   D. Harris III                                     |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer                              |
|   | Forrest   A. Garb & Associates, Inc.     |

 

----
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
|-------------------------

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of San Joaquin Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Bruce MaclinBruce MaclinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 24, 2009
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Stephen M. AnnisStephen M. AnnisChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)March 24, 2009
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### Jason Edward FENNER, Appellant, v. Candis TAYLOR; Kristian Pawlik; Charles Duell, Appellees.

No. 04-1911.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 27, 2004.

Decided: June 3, 2004.

Jason Edward Fenner, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Brickeys, AR, pro se.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jason Edward Fenner appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 *83U.S.C. § 1983 action against a prosecutor and two public defenders involved in state criminal proceedings against him. As relief, Mr. Fenner indicated he wanted a jury trial and a different attorney in his criminal case.

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper. Mr. Fenner’s allegations and the relief he requested indicate that he was in effect challenging the validity of his guilty plea and conviction. The sole federal remedy for a state prisoner bringing such a challenge is a writ of habeas corpus, *see Preiser v. Rodriguez,*411 U.S. 475, 499-500, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973), and there is no indication in the record that Mr. Fenner has exhausted his state court remedies, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A); *Carmichael v. White,*163 F.3d 1044, 1045 (8th Cir.1998) (§ 2254 petitioner has burden to show all available state remedies have been exhausted or exceptional circumstances exist). Accordingly, we affirm, but we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr. Fenner’s motion for appointment of counsel.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honor*83able Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 14061          Scale: 60,000          Edition: 27          Edition Date: 24-DEC-94          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1995/23**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
Argued May 6,

decided May 21, 1912.

#### MILLER *v.*HENRY.

[124 Pac. 199.]

From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge.

This is a suit by injunction brought by George Miller against J. C. Henry, county judge, J. M. Selders and C. A. .Galloway, county commissioners, Ed. Wright, county clerk, John Frawley, county treasurer, and F. P. Childers, sheriff. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by *Mr. John S. Hodgin.*

For respondents there was a briéf over the names of *Mr. Turner Oliver, Mr. Francis S. Ivanhoe,*District Attorney, *Mr. Thomas H. Crawford,*and *Mr. Robert Eakin,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Oliver, Mr. Ivanhoe*and *Mr. Crawford.*

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit involving the same parties and the same state of facts as the previous case of *Miller*v. *Henry,*62 Or. 4 (124 Pac. 197), except that here the former sheriff is made a defendant, and it appears that he has actually paid over the money lost by him, which the county is directed to refund. It involves no question not decided in the case involving the treasurer, and upon the authority of that case the decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Prescott National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Arizona.

# ACTION:

Notice of New Fee Site.

# SUMMARY:

The Prescott National Forest will begin charging a $150 fee for the daily rental of historic Groom Creek Schoolhouse near Prescott, Arizona. Rental of other facilities on the Prescott National Forest and other Arizona National Forests has shown that publics appreciate and enjoy the availability of historic rental facilities. Funds from the rental will be used for the continued operation and maintenance of Groom Creek Schoolhouse.

# DATES:

Groom Creek Schoolhouse will become available for rent April, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Forest Supervisor, Prescott National Forest, 344 S. Cortez St, Prescott, Arizona, 86303.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doug Schmidgall, Facility Engineer, Prescott National Forest, 928-443-8177.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish a six month advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. The Prescott National Forest currently has three other rental facilities. These rentals are booked regularly throughout their rental season. A business analysis for the rental of Groom Creek Schoolhouse shows that people desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Prescott National Forest. A market analysis indicates that the $150 daily fee is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. People wanting to rent Groom Creek Schoolhouse will need to do so through the National Recreation Reservation Service, at                     *http://www.reserveusa.com*                     or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 fee per reservation.                

Dated: November 14, 2006.

Alan M. Quan,

Forest Supervisor, Prescott National Forest.

[FR Doc. 06-9294  Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Postbinder, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Joseph Postbinder
Joseph PostbinderChief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2008 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
**Part I, Section B, Item 2(e) Chemical Structure Diagram TS**  **- C507**  **6 P**
# US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Formetanate Hydrochloride When EPA concluded the N-methyl carbamate cumulative risk assessment in September 2007, all tolerance reassessment and reregistration eligibility decisions for individual N-methyl carbamate pesticides were considered complete. N-methyl carbamate Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs), therefore, are considered completed REDs.

Com b ined PDF docum ent consis ts o f the f o llowing:
• Completion of the Tolerance Reassessment and Final Reregistration Eligibility Decisions for the N-methyl Carbamate Pesticides (September 24, 2007)
• Formetanate Hydrochloride I RED
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 25, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Semiconductor Test 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Interface Technologies, Haslemere, Surrey, United Kingdom 
has been added as a party to this venture. Also, Aquiris, Monroe, NY 
has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On May, 27, 2003, Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 17, 2003 (68 FR 35913).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 3, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53134).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9337 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 12(i)**Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Kin Wah Loh, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F (as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto) ofQimonda AG (the “Company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.March 30, 2007     By: /s/ Kin Wah Loh     Kin Wah Loh  Chief Executive Officer
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 34 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

4 There is established a Joint Congressional Committee 

5 on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as 

6 the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 

7 Members of the House of Representatives, to be appointed 

8 by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the 

9 House of Representatives, respectively. The joint com10 mittee is authorized to make the necessary arrangements 

11 for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice Presi12 dent-elect of the United States on January 20, 2025. 

13 SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE. 

14 The joint committee— 

15 (1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equip16 ment and the services of appropriate personnel of 

17 departments and agencies of the Federal Govern18 ment, under arrangements between the joint com19 mittee and the heads of those departments and 
2 

†SCON 34 ES 

1 agencies, in connection with the inaugural pro2 ceedings and ceremonies; and 

3 (2) may accept gifts and donations of goods 

4 and services to carry out its responsibilities. 

Passed the Senate May 2, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 34 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Establishing the Joint Congressional Committee on 

United States on January 20, 2025. President-elect and Vice President-elect of the Inaugural Ceremonies for the inauguration of the