alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

          - 32 CFR Part 656

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DOD.

# ACTION:

Final rule; removal. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army is resending AR 385-55, Prevention of Motor Vehicle Accidents, and has consolidated its requirements into AR 385-10, Army Safety Program. During consolidation, the section concerning the use of non-tactical off-road vehicles on Army land was removed.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 8, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Kenneth W. Proper, (703) 601-2408.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Office of the Director of Army Safety (DACS-SF), is the proponent for the regulation represented by 32 CFR Part 656. The Office of the Director of Army Safety has consolidated the Army regulation, represented by 32 CFR Part 656 into AR 385-10, Army Safety Program. This regulation was extensively revised                           ( print page 71052)                        during the consolidation process, and the new consolidated regulation does not affect the general public. Similar requirements concerning the use of off-road vehicles on Army land are now provided by 32 CFR 650, Environmental Protection and Enhancement (AR 200-1) and 32 CFR 651, Environmental Analysis Of Army Actions (AR 200-2) which when taken into combination provided greater and wider protection on installation than did 32 CFR Part 656 or AR 385-55.                

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 656

      - Environmental protection
      - Federal buildings and facilities
      - Traffic regulations

# PART 656—[REMOVED]

Accordingly, for reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority 10 U.S.C. 3012, 32 CFR Part 656, Installations, Use of Off-Road Vehicles on Army Land, is removed in its entirety.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-9599 Filed 12-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the 2012 Tampa Bay 

Host Committee, Inc. (TBH) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on June 11,2014, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on the 2012 Tampa Bay Host Committee, Inc. (TBH), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and Audit Division dated 

May 30,2014. 

Conunissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

a L 

C/ Date Shelley E. Gair 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Commission
ex10-b_16







EXHIBIT 10(b)(16)












Amendment Eighteen to Marketing Agreement











This document is Amendment Eighteen to the Marketing Agreement, made and
entered into effective June 1, 1993, and amended by Amendment One to
Marketing Agreement dated September 16, 1993; Amendment Two to Marketing
Agreement dated June 4, 1998; Amendment Three to Marketing Agreement dated
September 25, 1998; Amendment Four to Marketing Agreement dated
October 19, 1998; and Amendment Five to Marketing Agreement dated
December 15, 1998; Amendment Six to Marketing Agreement dated
March 25, 1999, Amendment Seven to Marketing Agreement dated May 10,
1999, Amendment Eight to Marketing Agreement dated June 24, 1999, Amendment
Nine to Marketing Agreement dated August 5, 1999, Amendment Ten to
Marketing Agreement dated October 1, 1999, Amendment Eleven to Marketing
Agreement dated January 31, 2000, Amendment Twelve to Marketing Agreement
dated March 1, 2000, Amendment Thirteen to Marketing Agreement dated
April 19, 2000, Amendment Fourteen to Marketing Agreement dated
July 31, 2000, Amendment Fifteen to Marketing Agreement dated
September 25, 2000, Amendment Sixteen to Marketing Agreement dated
October 31, 2000, and Amendment Seventeen to Marketing Agreement dated
November 29, 2000, (the “Agreement”), by and between American National
Insurance Company (“American National”) a Texas corporation, and Legacy
Marketing Group (“LMG”), a California corporation.










In consideration of mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:










	2.	 	Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
      entirety and the following new Section 3.1 shall be substituted
      therefore:












      “3.1 Subject to termination as
hereinafter provided, this Agreement shall remain in force and effect until the
close of business on March 31, 2001, the term of this Agreement. This
Agreement may be renewed by mutual agreement for successive terms of one
(1) year unless terminated by either party by prior written notice to the
other at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the end of the
initial term or the renewal term.”










      Except as specifically amended hereby,
all terms and provisions of the Marketing Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.










IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto
have executed this Agreement.










	 	 	 
	LEGACY MARKETING GROUP		AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE
      COMPANY












	 	 	 
	By: /s/ H. Lynn Stafford		By: /s/ Kelly M.
  Collier
	
      

      		
      

      
	Title: Chief Information Officer		Title: Vice President
	
      

      		
      

      
	Witness: /s/ Stephanie Molteni		Witness: /s/ Jynx
Yucra
	
      

      		
      

      
	Date: January 24, 2001		Date: January 22,
    2001
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74571-74572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular No. 20-73A, Aircraft Ice Protection

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of Advisory Circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
20-73A, Aircraft Ice Protection. This AC tells type certificate and 
supplemental type certificate applicants how to comply with ice 
protection requirements of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(14 CFR) parts 23, 25, 29, 33, and 35.

DATES: The Federal Aviation Administration's, Aircraft Engineering 
Division, issued AC 20-73A on August 16, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Federal Aviation Administration, 
Attn: George T. Soteropoulos, Aircraft Engineering Division's Technical 
Programs and Continued Airworthiness Branch, AIR-120, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-9796; fax (202) 
267-5340; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0265676d7065672c716d7667706d726d776e6d71426463632c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16717379647173386579627364796679637a79655670777738717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have filed in the docket all substantive 
comments received, and a report summarizing them. If you wish to review 
the docket in person, you may do so by going to the above address 
between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. If you wish to contact the above named individual directly, 
you can use the above telephone number or e-mail address.

[[Page 74572]]

How To Obtain Copies

    You may also obtain a copy of the AC via the Internet, by logging 
onto the FAA's Regulatory and Guidance Library (RGL) at: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/rgl. On the RGL Web site, click on ``Advisory 
Circular, then select Current ACs by number.'' Or, contact the person 
listed in the section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1, 2006.
Susan J.M. Cabler,
Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06-9629 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**01/01/08 thru 05/31/08**



### LVM **Unit 2 Unit 3**  **Unit 4**

**(lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)**  **(lbs/hr) 12 Hr Max Value**  62.63 22.78 77.29 **12 Hr A vg Value**  2.11 1.05 4.21 **Std Dev** 6.26 2.78 7.88 **Av g + I StdDev**  8.37 3.83 12.09 **Av g + 2 StdDev**  14.63 6.61 19.97

**01/01/08 thru 05/31/08** 

### SVM **Unit 2 Unit 3**  **Unit 4**

**(lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)**  **(lbs/hr) 12 Hr Max Value**  90.73 81.59 57.57 **12 Hr A vg Value**  2.18 2.93 3.40 **Std Dev** 7.00 8.64 6.34 **Av g + I StdDev**  9.18 11.57 9.74 **Av g + 2 StdDev**  16.18 20.21 16.08
§ 2520.65 What activities are prohibited in AmeriCorps subtitle C programs? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46033 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66614 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) While charging time to the AmeriCorps program, accumulating service or training hours, or otherwise performing activities supported by the AmeriCorps program or the Corporation, staff and members may not engage in the following activities: ( 1 ) Attempting to influence legislation;
( 2 ) Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes;
( 3 ) Assisting, promoting, or deterring union organizing;
( 4 ) Impairing existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements;
( 5 ) Engaging in partisan political activities, or other activities designed to influence the outcome of an election to any public office;
( 6 ) Participating in, or endorsing, events or activities that are likely to include advocacy for or against political parties, political platforms, political candidates, proposed legislation, or elected officials;
( 7 ) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization;
( 8 ) Providing a direct benefit to— ( i ) A business organized for profit;
( ii ) A labor union;
( iii ) A partisan political organization;
( iv ) A nonprofit organization that fails to comply with the restrictions contained in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 except that nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent participants from engaging in advocacy activities undertaken at their own initiative;
( v ) An organization engaged in the religious activities described in paragraph (g) of this section, unless Corporation assistance is not used to support those religious activities; and
( 9 ) Conducting a voter registration drive or using Corporation funds to conduct a voter registration drive;
( 10 ) Providing abortion services or referrals for receipt of such services; and
( 11 ) Such other activities as the Corporation may prohibit.
( b ) Individuals may exercise their rights as private citizens and may participate in the activities listed above on their initiative, on non-AmeriCorps time, and using non-Corporation funds. Individuals should not wear the AmeriCorps logo while doing so.
[67 FR 45359, July 9, 2002. Redesignated at 70 FR 39597, July 8, 2005; 73 FR 53759, Sept. 17, 2008; 74 FR 46506, Sept. 10, 2009]
Exhibit
99.4




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
 
 We
consent to the use of our report dated April 22, 2009 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Rainchief Energy Inc. (formerly Black
Diamond Brands Corporation) for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (filed under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.
  
 
 
 “Watson Dauphinee &
Masuch”
 Watson
Dauphinee & Masuch
 Chartered
Accountants
 
 
 Vancouver,
British Columbia, Canada
 April 22,
2009
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
La Cortez Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrés Gutierrez Rivera, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|/s/ Andrés Gutierrez Rivera |                        
|--------------------------- | -----------------------
|Name:                       | Andrés Gutierrez Rivera
|Title:                      | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                       | April 16, 2012
#### Mahon v. Hall.

*Practice*— *appeal from judgment by default after answer struck out as frivolous.*

Defendant in a foreclosure suit put in an answer which was struck out as frivolous. From the order striking it out defendant appealed, and the order was affirmed, and judgment taken by default against defendant. From this judgment defendant appealed. *Held,*that the order striking out the answer was the law of the case until reversed on appeal, and the correctness of that decision could not be questioned by the general term in an appeal from the final judgment.

• Appeals by William A.’Miller and Gilbert B. Weeks, from a judgment in an action to foreclose a mortgage. The action was brought in Kings county by George Mahon against John D. Hall, and numerous other defendants, of whom Miller was, and Weeks was not, one. Weeks appeared and answered, claiming to be the assignee of one of the defendants, a corporation. The only necessary further facts appear in the opinion.

*F. W. Earl,*for appellant Miller.

*John H. Lockwood,*for appellant Weeks.

*O. H. Stearns*and *H. 0. Place,*for respondent.

Talgott, J.

The defendant Miller and one Weeks appeal from the judgment, which is the ordinary judgment in a foreclosure case, and was taken against the appellants by default. Weeks, it seems, was not made a party to the suit at all; but he assumed to put in an answer setting up the' defense of usury. *391A similar answer was put in by Miller. Each of the answers was, on motion, struck out as frivolous, and the order striking them out was affirmed by the general term of this department. The judgment was taken as to the two appellants by default for want of answer. They now appeal from the judgment, and seek to draw in question the decision by which the answers were held to be frivolous. This they cannot do.

The order striking out the answers as frivolous constitutes the law of the case until reversed on appeal, and the correctness of the decision cannot be questioned on appeal from the final judgment to the general term of this court. Whether it can be reached in the court of appeals by an appeal from the final judgment is for that court to determine. The decision of the general term of this court on the validity of the answers was pronounced when the order of the special term striking them out as frivolous was affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs of the appeal.

*Judgment affirmed.*
P.O. Box 1917 

Bismarck, ND 58502 

Phone: (701) 255-0030 

Fax: (701) 255-7513 

Website: www.r\dgop.org 

NortnuaKota mp^^ ^ Email: iiifo@ndeop.org Republican Party ° ^ ° 

May 9, 2013 

North Dakota # B 

Brenda Wheeler 

Auditor 

Federal Election Commission 

Re: FEC Audit 

Dear Brenda: 

I completed the 2010 amendments yesterday and sincerely want to "Thank You" and the rest of 

your team for helping me through this process. 

From the date I started working here until now, the fact that my bank records did not coincide 

with the FEC reports bothered me, so to have your help in amending these reports and 

correcting the mistakes that were made, relieves me greatly. 

It was also a pleasure having you and your team here to answer questions and to assist me 

when I had questions on these reports. I can honestly say this is a continuous learning process 

and I look fon/vard to learning more. 

I know that there will be more amendments to file as we now have the rest of the reports up and 

to today's date to amend and will need to get those to balance with our bank records, but I so 

look foHA/ard to the day when "line 8" matches what I have in the bank. 

Line 8 on the "Year-End" report for 2010 is still off, but after you take a look at these you may 

find what needs to be done to correct it so our starting date in 2011 matches our bank records. 

I will wait until I hear back from you before any other corrections and amendments are made. 

I'm hoping you will share my thoughts with the rest of your team and let them know just how 

much I appreciate the fact that they were here to help and not to intimidate me through this 

process. I guess when you know that mistakes have been made, it makes the process a whole 

lot easier. For us, it was just many errors in not knowing what needed to be reported and what 

schedule and lines the items needed to be reported on. 

I look fon/vard to hearing back from you on these and eager to start on the next step of this 

process. 

Very truly yours, 

Dee Stanley ^ 

Business Manager 

North Dakota Republican Party 

Paid for by the North Dakota Republican Party 

P.O. Box 1917 • Bismarck, ND 58502 

Not Paid for or Authorized by any Candidate or Candidate Committee
EXHIBIT 31.1

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Flexible Solutions
International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    November 12th 2004

/s/Dan O'Brien
Dan O'Brien
CEO