alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TeaPartyExpress.org 

September 5, 2016 

Federal Election Commission 

Audit Division 

Zuzana Pacious 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: TeaPartyExpress.org 

Dear iVIs Pacious: 

Thank you for your patience in my reply to the DFAR.and'audlt findings. 

Item 1; Misstatement of Financial Activity 

During'the time of activity there were challenges with data and the committee is willing to amend 

reports as needed for this activity. 

Item 2: Disclosure of Occupation/Name of Ewpioyer 

We have significantly improved our process for collection and reporting employer and occupations. Wie 

have always practiced "best efforts" to obtain, maintain employer and occupations. We have created a 

system internally which obtains the information faster so that it can be readily reported at the time the 

compliance report for said contributions, it is our understanding that no further action is needed on this 

item. 

Item 3; Reporting of Apparent Independent Expenditures 

The. bulk of the activity was towards fundraising.' The communications identified in the findings were for 

fundraising and not electioneering. The Fundraising solicitations of the committee were not 

electioneering; they were fundraising for the committee's activities. 

Item 4: Recordkeeping for Communications 

We provided copies of invoices and payments made; we have had challenges collecting further 

information from the consultants and email vendor. We have changed our collection process for the 

details of the communications. 

item S: Failure to itemize,Debts and Obligations 

During the time of activity there were challenges vyith data and the committee Is willing to amend 

reports as needed for this activity. 
TeaPartyExpress.org 

Committee Reports being amended; 

Regarding Finding 1 and 5; 

2011 Mid-Year Report: Disclose additional Unitemized Contributions from individuals for $103,315 on 

Line 11 (a)(ii). Committee is in the process of reactivating our previous software to complete this 

amendment. 

2011 Year Report/January 2012 Monthly: Disclose additional Unitemized Contributions from 

Individuals for $103,315 on Line 11 (a)(ii) - Column B , Also disclose^^additional items on Schedule D. 

Committee is in the process of reactivating our previous software to complete this amendment. 

February 2012 Monthly to January 2013 Monthly: Discloses additional items on .Schedule D, reflects 

adjusted COH from 2011 Mid Year Report adjustment. 

Planned amendment: 

August 2016 Monthly: Per recommendation to fiie on most recent report. Included a note "Adjusted 

cash on hand balance that resulted from an audit adjustment from a prior period." Have question for 

reports analysis prior to completing as to how inflation of cash will be adjusted. 

; 

Kelly Lawier 

Treasurer
#### § 2551.22 What are the responsibilities of a sponsor?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542, Aug. 30, 2024.

A sponsor is responsible for fulfilling all project management requirements necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Senior Companion Program as specified in the Act. A sponsor shall not delegate or contract these overall management responsibilities to another entity. CNCS retains the right to determine what types of management responsibilities may or may not be contracted.

[83 FR 64645, Dec. 17, 2018]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 09 4 . ANTHONY S. W ASHI NGTON v . THE STATE.

On Ju n e 2 9

, 2 0 1 5

, t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed A n t h o n y W as h i n g t o n ’ s m o t i o n to

co rrect a v o id s en t en ce. On Oct ob er 7, 2 0 1 5

, W as hi n g t o n fi l ed

, i n t h i s Co u rt

, a

“ No t i ce o f A p p eal ” fro m t h e tri al co u rt ’ s ru l i n g, w h i ch we d o ck et ed as an ap p l i cat i o n

fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal

. 1 W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

An ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i scret i o n ary ap p eal m u st b e fi l ed wi th i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry

o f t h e ord er o r ju d g m en t t o b e ap peal ed . OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e req u i rem en t s o f

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o n al

, an d t hi s Co u rt can n o t accep t an ap pl i cat i o n fo r

ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m

p l i an ce t h erewi t h

. Bo

yl e v. S t a t e

, 1 9 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 4 (3 8 0

SE2 d 5 7) (1 9 8 9 ). W as hi n g t o n fi l ed h i s ap p l i cat i o n 1 00 d ay s aft er en try o f t h e o rd er

h e s eek s t o ap p eal

. Th e r e f o re, h i s u n t im el y ap p l i cat i on is h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r

l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

1 W as h in gt o n ’ s “ No t i ce o f Ap p eal ” w as d o c k e t ed as an ap pl i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal b ecau s e i t was fi l ed in t h i s Co u rt rat h er t h an in t h e t ri al co u rt

. Co m p are OCGA § 5 -6 -3 7 (n o t i ces o f ap p eal are fi l ed i n t h e t r i a l co u rt ), wi t h i d.

§ 5 -6 -3 5 (d ) (ap p l i cat i o n s fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal are fi l ed i n t h e ap p el l at e co u rt ).

November 03, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/03/2015
#### §§ 2104.112-2104.129 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70520-70521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Development of State-of-the-Art Mechanisms for 
Epidemiological Research.
    Date: December 6, 2006.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Eric Zatman, Contract Review Specialist, Office 
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1438.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Develop a Real-Time fMRI Feedback System that Allows 
Drug Abusers to Control Cravings and Urges and/or Increase Their 
Self-Control of Their Drug Taking.
    Date: December 20, 2006.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).

[[Page 70521]]

    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1439, lf33c.nih.gov.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 29, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9524 Filed 12-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

June 25.2012 

Jan Witold Baran 

Caleb P. Bums 

Wiley Rein LLP 

1776 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

RE: MUR6589 

American Action Network 

Dear Messrs. Baran & Bums: 

This is in response to your letter dated June 22,2012, requesting a 20-day extension to 

respond to the complaint filed in the above-noted matter. Considering the circumstances 

presented in your letter, the Office of General Counsel has granted the requested extension. 

Accordingly, your response is due by the close of business on or before July 20,2012; 

If you have any questions, please contact me on our toll-fi:ee telephone number, (800) 

424-9530. Our local telephone number is (202) 694-1650. 

Sincerely, 

ICim Collins, Paralegd 

Complaints Examination aiid 

Legal Administration
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Jja. the Matter of ) 

) A09-22 

The Legacy Committee Political Action ) Agenda Document No. 12-30 

Committee ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission open 

meeting on June 07,2012 do hereby certify that the Commission took the following actions in 

the above-captioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to: 

Approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on The 

Legacy Committee Political Action Committee (A09-22), as set forth 

in Agenda Document No. 12-30, with the amendment to Finding 1 

pursuant to the meeting discussion. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Walther and Weintraub voted affinnatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Himter, McGahn II and Petersen dissented. 

2. Decided by a vote of 6-0 to: 

Approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on The 

Legacy Committee Political Action Committee (A09-22) except that 

the following communications be considered those that contain express 

advocacy: 11,18,19,20,21,22,24,26,27,28,29,30,31, 32, 33, 34, 

35,36,37,39,40,41,44,45,46,47,49,50,51,52,53,55,56,57,59, and 60. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Himter, McGahn n, Petersen, Walther and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date Sliawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk ofthe Commission
§ 2506.52 What procedures will the Corporation use to collect amounts I owe to a Federal agency by offsetting a payment that the Corporation would otherwise make to me? ( a ) Any Federal agency may request that the Corporation administratively offset funds due and payable to you in order to collect a debt you owe to that agency. The Corporation will initiate the requested offset only upon: ( 1 ) Receipt of written certification from the creditor agency stating: ( i ) That you owe the debt;
( ii ) The amount and basis of the debt;
( iii ) That the agency has prescribed regulations for the exercise of administrative offset; and
( iv ) That the agency has complied with its own administrative offset regulations and with the applicable provisions of the FCCS, including providing you with any required hearing or review; and
( 2 ) A determination by the Chief Executive Officer that offsetting funds payable to you by the Corporation in order to collect a debt owed by you would be in the best interest of the United States as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, and that such an offset would not otherwise be contrary to law.
( b ) *Multiple debts.* In instances where two or more creditor agencies are seeking administrative offsets, or where two or more debts are owed to a single creditor agency, the Corporation may, in its discretion, allocate the amount it owes to you to the creditor agencies in accordance with the best interest of the United States as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, paying special attention to applicable statutes of limitations.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

 
|   | **KPMG LLP**                       | Telephone | (604) 691-3000 |
|--------|------------------------------------|-----------|----------------|
|   | **Chartered   Accountants**        | Fax       | (604) 691-3031 |
|   | PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir   Street | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca    |
|   | Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3               |      |           |
|   | Canada                             |      |           |

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors of Westport Innovations Inc.:

 

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:

 

·                      our Independent Auditors’ Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 28, 2012 on the consolidated balance sheets of Westport Innovations Inc. (“the Company”) as at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, and the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2011 and for the years ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010

 

·                      our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 28, 2012 on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011

 

each of which is incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration statements (No. 333-168847) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-178714) on Form F-10 of the Company

 

 

Chartered Accountants

 

February 28, 2012 Vancouver, Canada

 
|   | KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership   is the Canadian |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.              |   |

 

----
#### Mary C. Burke, as Executrix of Thomas P. Burke, Deceased, Respondent, v. Joseph F. Baker et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

(Argued March 4, 1907;

decided April 2, 1907.)

Evidence — Self-serving Declarations. In an action to recover for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff's testator to the defendants, the admission in evidence of certain entries in diaries of the testator relating to such alleged services is erroneous since they must be regarded as self-serving declarations and are clearly inadmissible.

*Burke*v. *Baker,*111 App. Div. 433, affirmed.

*562Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 6, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

This action was brought to recover for legal services alleged to have been rendered to the defendants by the plaintiff’s testator.

*David B. Bill, Nelson Smith*and *Willard U. Taylor*for appellants.

*Thoinas F. Magner*and *John F. Oarew*for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

The unanimous decision of the Appellate Division that there is evidence supporting or tending to sustain the findings of fact leaves open in this court the single question whether the findings support the conclusions of law. An inspection of the findings leads to the conclusion that this question must be answered in the affirmative.

A further question is raised by objection and exception to the admission in evidence of certain entries in the diaries of Thomas P. Burke, the plaintiff’s testator, relating to services alleged to have been rendered by him to the defendants. The le'arned trial judge ruled as follows : *“*I will permit the entries for the purpose of showing his connection with- the course of the litigation.” These entries must be regarded as self-serving declarations and clearly inadmissible.

We have reached the conclusion, however, after an examination of the evidence that their admission is not to be regarded as prejudicial error. There is evidence in' the record, apart from that contained in the diaries, warranting the findings .that Thomas P. Burke, the plaintiff’s testator, was employed by the defendants and rendered legal services as therein set forth in detail.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur; Cullen, Ch. J., and Haight, J., dissent on the ground that the admission of the diary of plaintiff’s testator was fatal error.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS,
IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED
IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933 AS AMENDED.

                                                               EXHIBIT NO. 10.55


          Amendment to Distributorship Agreement between Med-Tec Iowa,
          Inc., and Implant Sciences Corporation dated 26 January 2000


     This amendment changes the mandatory weekly minimum seed purchase in
section 1.1 and described Exhibit A of the agreement.

     In section 1.1 the "start-up" period shall begin February 1, 2001 and end
[*] months later. Also in section 1.1, the definition of the number of weeks in
the month during the start-up period is the number of work days in the month
divided by five. Days in each partial workweek will be counted as 1/5 of a week.
For example, January 2001 contains 4 full workweeks plus 3 more workdays or 3/5
of a week for a total of 4.6 weeks in the month.

     Column 2 in Exhibit A (weekly minimum seed purchase) is changed as shown
below.

     [*]

     ** All months are for the year 2001

MED-TEC IOWA, INC.                                  IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION


/s/ Clayton Korver                                  /s/ Anthony J. Armini
---------------------------                         ----------------------------
Clayton Korver       Date                           Anthony J. Armini       Date
It's President & CEO                                It's President & CEO


[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY
BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE
406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.
#### § 1616.5 Preference to local applicants.

When equally qualified applicants are under consideration for an attorney position, a recipient shall give preference to an applicant residing in the community to be served.
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Jack Abramov certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report: 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 9, 2007 /s/   Jack Abramov Jack Abramov Chief Executive Officer