alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert C. Woodworth, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pulitzer Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2004
/s/ Robert C. WoodworthRobert C. Woodworth
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 221 (Thursday, November 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 66756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation Board of 
Visitors; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
annual meeting of the Board of Visitors (BoV) for the Western 
Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC). Notice of this 
meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463). The Board's charter was renewed on February 1, 2006 in 
compliance with the requirements set forth in Title 10 U.S.C. 2166.
    Date: November 30-December 1, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. (November 30) and 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. 
(December 1).
    Location: Building 35, 7011 Morrison Ave., Fort Benning, GA 31905.
    Proposed Agenda: The WHINSEC BoV will be briefed on activities at 
the Institute since the last Board meeting on June 15, 2006 as well as 
receive other information appropriate to its interests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: WHINSEC Board of Visitors Secretariat 
at (703) 614-3818 or (703) 614-8721.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
comment by individuals and organizations may be made from 12 p.m. to 1 
p.m. on Friday, December 1, 2006. Public comments will be limited to 
five minutes each. Anyone desiring to make an oral statement must 
register by sending a fax to (703) 614-8920 with their name, phone 
number, e-mail address, and the full text of their comments by 5 p.m. 
EST on Monday, November 27, 2006. The first twelve requestors will be 
notified by 5 p.m. EST on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 of their time to 
address the Board during the public comment forum. All other comments 
will be retained for the record. Public seating is limited and will be 
available only on a first come, first serve basis.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-9219 Filed 11-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 18-5227 September Term, 2018

 FILED ON: MAY 21, 2019

LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC.,

APPELLANT

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

APPELLEE

On Certification of Constitutional Questions

from the United States District Court

(No. 1:16-cv-00121)

Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, GRIFFITH, SRINIVASAN,

 MILLETT, PILLARD, WILKINS, KATSAS, Circuit Judges*

J U D G M E N T

This cause came on to be heard on the certification of constitutional questions from the

United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On

consideration thereof, and of the Federal Election Commission’s motion to dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction, the response thereto, and the reply, it is 

ORDERED that the motion be denied. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the imposition of FECA’s annual

contribution limits on Shaber’s bequest, and FECA’s two-tiered contribution limit, both on its face

and as applied to Shaber’s bequest, do not violate the Libertarian National Committee’s First

Amendment rights. 

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail

Deputy Clerk

Date: May 21, 2019

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Tatel.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge Griffith.

Opinion concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part, and dissenting in part filed by

Circuit Judge Katsas, with whom Circuit Judge Henderson joins.

* Circuit Judge Rao did not participate in this matter.

USCA Case #18-5227 Document #1788686 Filed: 05/21/2019 Page 1 of 1
#### Rockwell v. Lawrence, appellant.

*Evidence*— *cma/rd.*

Plaintiff and S. both claimed to own certain hay. S. sold the hay to defendant, and afterward submitted the dispute to arbitrators who made an award in favor of plaintiff. *Eeld,*that this award was admissible as evidence of plaintiff’s title in an action against defendant for the price of the hay.

*476Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Hervey Rockwell against Alfred Lawrence, to recover the price of a quantity of hay sold defendant by one Jacob Seymour, a tenant of plaintiff, the hay having been raised-upon a farm belonging to plaintiff. The facts relating to the only material point appear in the opinion.

*C. Frost,*for appellant.

*Charles H. Mundy,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The plaintiff and one Seymour made an agreement, by which Seymour agreed to work plaintiff’s farm for one year, from 1st of April, 1865. Seymour was to have one-third of the products for his labor, and was to have one-third of the hay which was left in the spring of 1866, after leaving as much and as good hay as he received from plaintiff at the commencement of the lease. Just before the termination of the year, in March, 1866, Seymour sold some hay to defendant. Plaintiff claimed the hay. Upon this state of facts, plaintiff and Seymour agreed to submit the question to two arbitrators, and these arbitrators determined that Seymour had had all he was entitled to under the lease or agreement, and that plaintiff was entitled to collect the proceeds of sales made by Seymour. The defendant was notified of this award. Upon the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence the award as between plaintiff and Seymour. The defendant objected to this award as not binding him. The evidence was received, and this presents the only question raised on this appeal. I think the evidence was admissible. The plaintiff had proven his title to the hay. It was raised on his farm. Seymour was to have one-third of what remained after making good the old hay of the preceding year. If he had produced a bill of sale of the hay from Seymour to him, it would have been evidence of title in plaintiff. The award was offered for the same purpose and had the same effect. As between plaintiff and Seymour, plaintiff owned the hay. The award conclusively established this as against Seymour, and in favor of plaintiff. The defendant had no interest in the question of ownership, and could not have been made a party to the arbitration. He was simply to pay the true owner, and the award established that as to the rival claimants.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ACCREDO HEALTH, INCORPORATED FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,558
<INVENTORY>                                     21,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,698
<PP&E>                                           4,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,679
<BONDS>                                         20,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            92
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,712
<SALES>                                         72,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,871
<CGS>                                           64,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,363
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,968
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
§ 235.110 Fraud. State plan requirements: A State plan under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI of the Social Security Act must provide: ( a ) That the State agency will establish and maintain: ( 1 ) Methods and criteria for identifying situations in which a question of fraud in the program may exist, and
( 2 ) Procedures developed in cooperation with the State's legal authorities for referring to law enforcement officials situations in which there is valid reason to suspect that fraud has been practiced. The definition of fraud for purposes of this section will be determined in accordance with State law.
( b ) For methods of investigation of situations which there is a question of fraud, that do not infringe on the legal rights of persons involved and are consistent with the principles recognized as affording due process of law.
( c ) For the designation of official position(s) responsible for referral of situations involving suspected fraud to the proper authorities.
[36 FR 3869, Feb. 27, 1971]
§ 146.143 Preemption; State flexibility; construction. ( a ) *Continued applicability of State law with respect to health insurance issuers.* Subject to paragraph (b) of this section and except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, part A of title XXVII of the PHS Act is not to be construed to supersede any provision of State law which establishes, implements, or continues in effect any standard or requirement solely relating to health insurance issuers in connection with group health insurance coverage except to the extent that such standard or requirement prevents the application of a requirement of this part.
( b ) *Continued preemption with respect to group health plans.* Nothing in part A of title XXVII of the PHS Act affects or modifies the provisions of section 514 of ERISA with respect to group health plans.
( c ) *Special rules* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the provisions of part A of title XXVII of the PHS Act relating to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer supersede any provision of State law which establishes, implements, or continues in effect a standard or requirement applicable to imposition of a preexisting condition exclusion specifically governed by section 2701 of the PHS Act which differs from the standards or requirements specified in section 2701 of the PHS Act.
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* Only in relation to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, the provisions of this part do not supersede any provision of State law to the extent that such provision requires special enrollment periods in addition to those required under section 2702 of the Act.
( d ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *State law.* For purposes of this section the term *State law* includes all laws, decisions, rules, regulations, or other State action having the effect of law, of any State. A law of the United States applicable only to the District of Columbia is treated as a State law rather than a law of the United States.
( 2 ) *State.* For purposes of this section the term *State* includes a State (as defined in § 144.103), any political subdivisions of a State, or any agency or instrumentality of either.
[69 FR 78797, Dec. 30, 2004; 70 FR 21147, Apr. 25, 2005; 79 FR 10315, Feb. 24, 2014]
#### Fannie J. Montgomery, as Administratrix of the Estate of Archibald G. Montgomery, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*New York City Railway Company, Defendant, and Peter J. Rafferty et al., as Copartners under the Firm Name of Rafferty Brothers, Appellants.

*Montgomery*v. *New York City Railway Co.,*125 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued December 15, 1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 29, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff’s intestate entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendants’ negligence.

*526
      *Alfred S. Brown*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71542-71543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9641]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the

[[Page 71543]]

Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
December 14, 2006, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> November 9, 2006 (Open)

B. New Business

    <bullet> Bookletter on Farm Credit Bank and Association Appointed 
Directors

Reports

    <bullet> FCSBA Quarterly Report
    <bullet> Economic and Funding Approval Update

Closed Session\*\

    <bullet> OSMO Quarterly Report

    Dated: December 6, 2006.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and 
(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 06-9641 Filed 12-7-06; 1:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 69149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [71 FR 68645, 
November 27, 2006].

STATUS: Closed meeting.

PLACE: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MEETING: Additional meeting (Week of 
November 27, 2006).
    A closed meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, November 30, 2006 
at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matter will attend the closed meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), 
(7), (9)(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at 
the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Campos as duty officer, voted to consider the item 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
November 30, 2006 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and
Institution of an administrative proceeding.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: November 27, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9473 Filed 11-27-06; 3:54 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shiner International,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), XueZhu Xu,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:            March
      24, 2009
              By:
              /s/ XueZhu XuName:
      XueZhu XuTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer







This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 2556.600 How is a position for a leader established in a project, or in multiple projects within a contiguous geographic region? ( a ) At its discretion, AmeriCorps may approve the establishment of a leader position based on the following factors: ( 1 ) The need for a leader in a project of a substantial size and with multiple VISTAs assigned to serve at that project, or the need for leader for multiple projects located within a contiguous geographic region.
( 2 ) The need for a leader to assist with the communication of VISTA policies and administrative procedures to VISTAs within a project, or throughout the multiple projects within a contiguous geographic region, as applicable.
( 3 ) The need for a leader to assist with the professional development of VISTAs within a project, or throughout the multiple projects within a contiguous geographic region, as applicable.
( 4 ) The need for a leader to assist with the recruitment and preparation for the arrival of VISTAs within a project, or throughout the multiple projects within a contiguous geographic region, as applicable.
( 5 ) The capacity of the VISTA supervisor to support and guide the leader.
( b ) A sponsor may request, in its project application, that AmeriCorps establish a leader position in its project.