alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Fred Kupel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Flexible Solutions
International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 12, 2005

/s/FRED KUPEL
Fred Kupel
CFO
Exhibit 99.6






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. §1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Westport Innovations Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Demers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







June 8, 2011                                                                /s/ David R. Demers




David R. Demers


Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies this annual report on Form 40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 12.1  ONEBEACON INSURANCE GROUP, LTD. Computation
of Ratio of Earnings (Loss) to Fixed Charges ($
in millions except ratios)  Year Ended2004
  
  2005
  
  2006
  
  2007
  
  2008Consolidated pre-tax
  income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in earnings of
  affiliates and discontinued operations
  
  $
  182.1
  
  $
  262.8
  
  $
  304.1
  
  $
  398.5
  
  $
  (602.3
  )Distributed
  income of equity investees
  
  
  
  
  
  70.0
  
  
  
  Interest expense
  on debt
  
  45.0
  
  44.1
  
  45.5
  
  45.2
  
  44.9Interest portion
  of rental expense
  
  11.4
  
  11.6
  
  13.6
  
  11.1
  
  7.4Earnings (loss)
  
  $
  238.5
  
  $
  318.5
  
  $
  433.2
  
  $
  454.8
  
  $
  (550.0
  )Interest expense
  on debt
  
  45.0
  
  44.1
  
  45.5
  
  45.2
  
  44.9Interest portion
  of rental expense
  
  11.4
  
  11.6
  
  13.6
  
  11.1
  
  7.4Fixed charges
  
  $
  56.4
  
  $
  55.7
  
  $
  59.1
  
  $
  56.3
  
  $
  52.3Ratio
  of earnings (loss) to fixed charges
  
  4.2
  
  5.7
  
  7.6
  
  8.1
  
  (10.5
  )
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75264-75265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material,

[[Page 75265]]

and personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Baloh P50 Review.
    Date: January 18, 2007.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Shiguang Yang, DVM, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, NIH, 6120 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 8, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9712 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 200)]
[Notices]               
[Page 63822]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc10-49]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

    Briefing Matter: Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety 
Information Database--Final Rule.
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: October 12, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26232 Filed 10-14-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Opinion issued August 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00535-CV

———————————

CAMERON KEITH ERSKIN, Appellant

V.

ALEXIS LEE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 505th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 16-DCV-235734

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was originally due September 6, 2018. The Court granted 

one extension until December 6, 2018. On December 27, 2018, this Court issued a 

notice advising appellant that unless he filed his brief within ten days, we might 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant’s counsel had filed a 
2

motion to withdraw, which this Court granted on November 7, 2018, the Court 

issued a second notice to the pro se appellant concerning filing the brief within ten 

days or the appeal might be dismissed. No response or brief was filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 18 

Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security 

relating to ‘‘Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, 

Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. HAWLEY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. LEE, Mr. RISCH, 

and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of 

Homeland Security relating to ‘‘Public Charge Ground 

of Inadmissibility’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the final rule submitted by the 

4 Department of Homeland Security relating to ‘‘Public 

5 Charge Ground of Inadmissibility’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 55472 

6 (September 9, 2022)), and such rule shall have no force 

7 or effect. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7536
CLARENCE GARFIELD BUFFALO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BILL CLINTON, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-840-3) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Garfield Buffalo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant noted this appeal outside the appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on January 11, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on September 27, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore denyleave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 77758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies Cancer Research 
Hospital, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special Exposure 
Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 
Compensation Program Act of 2000. On November 9, 2006, as provided for 
under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following 
class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

    Employees of the Department of Energy predecessor agencies and 
their contractors or subcontractors who were monitored or should 
have been monitored while working at the Oak Ridge Institute of 
Nuclear Studies Cancer Research Hospital from May 15, 1950, through 
December 31, 1963, and who were employed for a number of work days 
aggregating at least 250 work days or in combination with work days 
within the parameters established for one or more other classes of 
employees in the SEC.

    This designation became effective on December 9, 2006, as provided 
for under 42 U.s.C. 73841(14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 9, 2006, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9a6aaa8baa9aaadaac7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f707c7e6c7f7c7b7c11787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard, M.D.
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 06-9875 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### St. Paul Harvester Works, appellant, v. Henry B. Huckfeldt, appellee.

Filed July 11, 1914.

No. 17,727.

Mortgages: Foreclosure: Decree: Dormancy. A decree of foreclosure of a mortgage in this state is not a judgment within the meaning of section 482 of the code of civil procedure, and does not become dormant by a failure to issue an order of sale within five years.

Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Harry S, Dungan, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J.*A. *Gardiner,*for appellant.

*John Snider*and *W. F. Button, contra.*

Fawcett, J.

In 1884 defendant sold the north half of section 19, township 7, range 11, in Adams county, to one William Gardiner, and executed and delivered to him a warranty deed therefor. In 1885 the nominal plaintiff in this proceeding, St. Paul Harvester Works, commenced a suit to foreclose a mortgage upon the land described, which had been executed by defendant. Gardiner, to protect his interests in the land, first took a nine months’ stay, and then paid the decree which had been entered in the foreclosure suit. Nothing further appears to have been done until June, 1909, when Gardiner filed a motion in the original foreclosure suit “to revive the judgment.” A conditional order of revivor was entered, to which defendant answered. Upon hearing the matter, the district court dismissed Gar-diner’s application for revivor, from which order of dismissal this appeal is prosecuted.

In the briefs counsel on both sides concede that the only question before us on this appeal is whether a decree of foreclosure is a judgment within the meaning of section 482 of the code, which becomes dormant at the expiration of five years, and which may be revived in the same *553■manner as judgments under that section. It is needless to spend time discussing this proposition. It is foreclosed against Mr. Gardiner’s contention in *Beaumont v.*Herrick, 24 Ohio St. 445, 457, and *Moore v.*Ogden, 35 Ohio St. 430, which cases are cited and followed by this court in *Herbage v.*Ferree, 65 Neb. 451, holding that a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage in this state is not a judgment within the meaning of section 482 of the code, and does not become dormant by a failure to issue an order of sale within five years.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C.
Woodworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      To my knowledge, (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                                     /s/ Robert C. Woodworth
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Robert C. Woodworth
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     May 13, 2003

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pulitzer Inc. and will be retained by Pulitzer Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

Mr. Andrew T. O'Hare, Vice President Regulatory Affairs 

### JUN 2, 

### 3 2010 Portland Cement Association 5420 Old Orchard Road Skokie, Illinois 60077 OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS
Re: Standards ofPerformance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources; Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units; Identification ofNon-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) that are Solid Waste; Proposed Rules

- Requestto Extend the Public Comment Period Dear Mr. 0 'Hare: Thank you for your June 8, 2010, letter requesting thatthe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) extend the public comment period an additional 30 days for the proposedNHSM rule and the proposed CISWI rule. Your letter states this request is based onthe need to facilitate a comprehensive review ofthe proposals and to allow adequate time to develop a valuable response. The published commentperiod for the proposed rules began on June 4, 20]0, although theproposed rules were available onEPA's website onApril 30, 2010. EPA extended the deadline for written comments by 15 days (75 FR 32683) to August 3, 2010
. While EPA understands your concerns and appreciates your intentto provide substantive comments, we believe it is in the overall best interestto retain the existing commentperiod. In particular, EPA notes that it musttake final action onthe proposed CISWI rule by December 16,2010,pursuant to a court order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District ofColumbia. The commentperiod will close as scheduled on August 3,2010. Written comments must be postmarked no later than August 3, 2010. All interested people are encouraged to participate inthe rule making process during the comment period. All comments submitted during the commentperiod will be carefully considered. EPA welcomes the opportunity to continue working with the Portland Cement Association to improve the public involvementprocess.

cc: George Faison, OSWER



## J Toni Wyche Jones, OAQPS 

### 'nee ely I 

# r

- - ( f((

# !r/
.

# f:w/ r! Charlene Spel s

### ~ Natural Resources and Commer Group Sector Policies
.and Programs Division

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov RocycledIRecyclable • Printed**w~h** Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
§ 164.316 Policies and procedures and documentation requirements. A covered entity or business associate must, in accordance with § 164.306: ( a ) *Standard: Policies and procedures.* Implement reasonable and appropriate policies and procedures to comply with the standards, implementation specifications, or other requirements of this subpart, taking into account those factors specified in § 164.306(b)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), and (iv). This standard is not to be construed to permit or excuse an action that violates any other standard, implementation specification, or other requirements of this subpart. A covered entity or business associate may change its policies and procedures at any time, provided that the changes are documented and are implemented in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Standard: Documentation.* ( i ) Maintain the policies and procedures implemented to comply with this subpart in written (which may be electronic) form; and
( ii ) If an action, activity or assessment is required by this subpart to be documented, maintain a written (which may be electronic) record of the action, activity, or assessment.
( 2 ) *Implementation specifications:* ( i ) *Time limit (Required).* Retain the documentation required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section for 6 years from the date of its creation or the date when it last was in effect, whichever is later.
( ii ) *Availability (Required).* Make documentation available to those persons responsible for implementing the procedures to which the documentation pertains.
( iii ) *Updates (Required).* Review documentation periodically, and update as needed, in response to environmental or operational changes affecting the security of the electronic protected health information.
[68 FR 8376, Feb. 20, 2003, as amended at 78 FR 5695, Jan. 25, 2013]