alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1703.203 Decision to close meeting. ( a ) Commission members may decide before the meeting to close to public observation a meeting or portion or portions thereof, or to withhold information pertaining to such meeting, only if a majority of the members vote on the record to take such action. No proxy votes on this action shall be allowed. A single vote may be taken with respect to a series of meetings, a portion or portions of which are proposed to be closed to the public, or with respect to any information concerning such series of meetings, so long as each meeting in such series involves the same particular matters and is scheduled to be held no more than thirty days after the initial meeting in such series. If a decision is made to close a portion or portions of a meeting or a series of meetings, the Commission shall prepare a full written explanation of the closure action together with a list naming all persons expected to attend the meeting and identifying their affiliation.
( b ) For every meeting or portion thereof which Commission members have voted to close, the Chairman of NCLIS shall certify that, in his or her opinion, the meeting may properly be closed to the public. In addition, the Chairman shall state each relevant exemptive provision as set forth in § 1703.202(a). A copy of the Chairman's certification, together with a statement from the Chairman setting forth the time and place of the meeting and listing the persons present, shall be retained by the Commission.
( c ) Whenever any person whose interests may be directly affected by a portion of a meeting requests that the Commission close such portion to the public for any of the reasons referred to in § 1703.202 (a)(5), (6), or (7), the Commission members, upon request of any of the Commissioners, shall decide by recorded vote whether to close such portion. If a closure decision is made, the Commission shall prepare a full written explanation of the closure action together with a list naming all persons expected to attend the meeting and identifying their affiliation.
#### § 2500.1 Creation and authority.

The National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993 established the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) as a Federal agency, organized in the form of a Government corporation within the Executive Branch, to administer the national service programs authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990. CNCS also administers the national service programs authorized by the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended, and previously administered by the former Federal ACTION Agency.
Case 1:16-cv-00752-TNM Document 48 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 160.302 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Current Report of Mobile Reach International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 8-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Hewitt, Chief
Executive Office of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Action of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                            /s/  Alan Christopher Johnson
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Alan Christopher Johnson
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 June 14, 2005
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY?, 1997 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, February 27, 1997 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By David G. Marcos, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex. REs REPORTED 

No. No. SuBJEor Bv 
CALENDAR 

No. 

TREATY 

Doc. No. 

2 

TREATIES 

SUBJEcn' 

REPORTED 

BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENI' 

* 23 78 Charlene Barshefsky, ofthe District of Columbia, Feb 3, 97 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

to be United States Trade Representative, Committee on Finance, without 

with the rank of Ambassador Extraordinary printed report. 

and Plenipotentiary, vice Michael Kantor. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on
Form 10-Q/A of Maxygen, Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 Date:
    
    January 9, 2009
    
    /s/ Russell J. HowardRussell J. HowardChief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Application of Albert B. Miles, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus. Thomas W. Hamer et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of George B. Knollin, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus. Peter G. Hydorn et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Miles,*128 App. Div. 908, affirmed.

*Matter of Knollin,*128 App. Div. 908, affirmed.

(Argued October 7, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal, in each of the above-entitled proceedings, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court *527in the fourth judicial department, entered October 7, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to appoint certain persons as inspectors of election.

*K. J. Misen*for appellants.

*Koscoe Sargent*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs in each case; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch.-J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 13227          Edition: 15          Edition Date: August 2011          Clear Dates: NM - 10/22/2011     LNM - 10/11/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

NAR 0720S 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintennister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Forman ^ 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on the Majority Committee PAC (LRA 992) 

I. INTRODUCTION 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR") 

on the Majority Committee PAC ("McPAC"). The DFAR contains one fitiding: Excessive 

Contributions to Candidates. We concur wiA the finding. If you have any questions, please 

contact Margaret J. Forman, the attorney assigned to this audit.
#### § 287.15 Which Tribes are eligible to apply for NEW Program grants?

To be considered for a NEW Program grant, a Tribe must be an “eligible Indian tribe.” An eligible Indian tribe is an Indian tribe or Alaska Native organization that operated a Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) program in FY 1995.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (“First Place”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Therese A. Liutkus, Chief Financial Officer of First Place, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of First Place. |

|                   |   |   |                                                                      |
|-------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| November 14, 2002 |   |   | /s/ THERESE A. LIUTKUS                                               |
|                   |        |        |    **Therese A. Liutkus****Chief Financial Officer**  |
## Fw: VOC 

## RACT Applicability SIP prehearingwith rerquest for parallel processing Lynorae Benjamnn 

### eo Jane Spann, Vera Kornylak 07/19/2012 10:34 AM 

### fyi.


## ---- Forwarded by Lynorae Benjamin/R4/USEPA/US on 

### 0711 9/2Ol2 1O:33AM 

### ----- From: "Jimmy Johnston" <Jimmy.Johnston@dnr.state.ga.us> To: Lynorae Benjamin/R4/USEPA/US@EPA,ScottR DavislR4lUSEPA/US@EPA, Sara Waterson/R4/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "James Capp" <James.Capp@dnr.state.ga.us>, "James Kelly" <James.Kelly@dnr.state.ga.usz, "Lynne Collier" 

### <Lynne.Collier@dnr.state.ga.us> Dale: 0711912012 10:31AM Subject: VOC RACT Applicability SIP prehearing with rerquest for parallel processing



### attached, a hard-copy with CD will follow via 

### mail
James P. Johnston, P.E. Program Manager Planning & 

### Support Program Air Protection Branch Georgia Environmental Protection Division phone: 404/363-7014 fax: 404/363-7100



# - 

# - prehearing submissionwlth request for parallel processing.7.19.2012.pdfAdmin~and~Tech~Support_checklist.pdf 

# "%:

- 

# =JF - 20120719Notice~VOC~Applicability.pdf20120719 Amendment VOC ApplicabilityThresholds.pdf
20120719 Synopsis 

### - VOC Applicability.pdf
§ 287.80 What is the process for plan review and approval? ( a ) A Tribe must submit its plan to the ACF Regional Office, with a copy sent to the Division of Tribal Services, Office of Community Services, Administration for Children and Families, Attention: Native Employment Works Team.
( b ) To receive funding by the beginning of the NEW Program year (July 1), a Tribe must submit its plan by the established due date.
( c ) ACF will complete its review of the plan within 45 days of receipt.
( d ) After the plan review has occurred, if the plan is approvable, ACF will approve the plan, certifying that the plan meets all necessary requirements. If the plan is not approvable, the Regional Office will notify the Tribe regarding additional action needed for plan approval.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

October 23/ 2013 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel -

Lorenzo Holloway —. 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Danita C. Alberico 

Attomey 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on the Dallas County Republican Party (LRA 903) 

The Office ofthe General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR**) 

on the Dallas County Republican Party. The DFAR contains two findings: (I) Misstatement of 

Financial Activity; and (2) Recordkeeping for Employees. We concur with tiie findings. If you 

have any questions, please contact Danita C. Alberico, the attomey assigned to this audit.
#### § 2102.2 Actions outside of meetings.

Between meetings in situations of emergency, the Commission may act through a canvass by the Secretary of individual members, provided that any action so taken is brought up and ratified at the next meeting. In addition, the Commission members may convene away from the Commission's offices to make inspections at the site of a proposed project or at the location of a mock-up for the project and may then and there reach its conclusions respecting such project which shall be recorded in the minutes of the meeting held on the same day or, if none was then held, in the minutes of the next meeting.
---

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Wescorp Energy Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, each of Douglas Biles, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Terry Mereniuk, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and
belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: August 13, 2009 | /s/Douglas Biles                                                          
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Douglas Biles, Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer)
|                       |                                                                           
|                       |                                                                           
|Dated: August 13, 2009 | /s/Blaine Miciak                                                          
|                       | Blaine Miciak, Chief Financial Officer                                    
|                       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                              

---
§ 2544.140 How will the Corporation accept or reject an offer? ( a ) In general, the Corporation will respond to an offer of a donation in writing and include in the response: ( 1 ) An acknowledgment of receipt of the offer;
( 2 ) A brief description of the offer and any purpose or condition that the offeror specified for the use of the donation;
( 3 ) A statement either accepting or rejecting the donation; and
( 4 ) A statement informing the donor that any acceptance of services or property can not be used in any manner, directly or indirectly, that endorses the donor's products or services or appears to benefit the financial interests or business goals of the donor.
( b ) If a purpose or condition for the use of the donation specified by the offeror can not be accommodated, the Corporation may request the offeror to modify the terms of the donation.
§ 2525.470 Is a Designated Recipient required to accept a transferred education award? ( a ) *General rule.* No. A Designated Recipient is not required to accept a transferred education award and may reject an education award in whole or in part.
( b ) *Result of rejection in full.* If the Designated Recipient rejects a transferred education award in whole, the amount is credited back to the transferring Eligible Individual's account in the National Service Trust, and may be transferred to another individual, or may be used by the transferring Eligible Individual, consistent with the original period of availability set forth in § 2525.40(a).
( c ) *Result of rejection in part.* If the Designated Recipient rejects a transferred education award in part, the rejected portion is credited to the transferring Eligible Individual's account in the National Service Trust for their use, including re-transfer of the education award, consistent with the original period of availability set forth in § 2525.40(a).
( d ) *Rescission.* A Designated Recipient who originally accepted a transferred education award may rescind their acceptance of any unused portion of the award at any time before the education award expires, and for any reason.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-21-0000660

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUNTER PARKER, Defendant-Appellant

A PPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT H ONOLULU DIVISION (CASE NO. 1DTA-21-01370)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Hiraoka, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant Hunter Parker's (Parker) February 15, 2022 Motion to Withdraw Appeal, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) Parker seeks to dismiss this docketed appeal; (2) attached to the motion is Parker's declaration showing he understands the consequences of voluntary dismissal, consistent with Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(c); and (3) dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(b) and (c). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 18, 2022. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-21-0000660 18-MAR-2022 08:26 AM Dkt. 16 OGMD
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

*Meeting Date and Time:*                         Friday, January 12, 2006-1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Address:*                         Emrick Technology Center, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton, PA 18042.                    

The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100- , November 18, 1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

Dated: December 22, 2006.

C. Allen Sachse, 

Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9925 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 42 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service 

relating to ‘‘Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint Processing—Policy Update’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WICKER, and 

Ms. ERNST) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Food and Nutrition Service relating to ‘‘Application 

of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination 

Complaint Processing—Policy Update’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Food 

4 and Nutrition Service relating to ‘‘Application of Bostock 

5 v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint 

6 Processing—Policy Update’’ (issued May 5, 2022, as a 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 42 IS 

1 memorandum, and a letter of opinion from the Govern2 ment Accountability Office dated June 5, 2023, printed 

3 in the Congressional record on June 7, 2023, on pages 

4 S1998–S2000, concluding that such memorandum is a 

5 rule under the Congressional Review Act), and such rule 

6 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB