alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Status of Funding, (5) General Discussion (6) Status of Legislation, (7) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 22, 2007, from 1:30 p.m. and end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in the Mendocino National Forest Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. Individuals who wish to speak or propose agenda items send their names and proposals to David A. Mortin, Acting DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95939. (530) 968-1815; EMAIL                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and individuals who made written request by January 19, 2007 have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: December 18, 2006.

David T. Morton,

Acting Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 06-9824  Filed 12-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                 1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          2,146
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,376
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                3,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    63,232
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         80,090
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           79,849
<LOANS>                                       183,695
<ALLOWANCE>                                       967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                285,686
<DEPOSITS>                                    207,771
<SHORT-TERM>                                   21,350
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,056
<LONG-TERM>                                    29,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          318
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                285,686
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 6,260
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               2,508
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  313
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                9,081
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              4,754
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,104
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           2,977
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      43
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   602
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      536
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.49
<LOANS-NON>                                       335
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  924
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 967
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 68 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1595 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 20, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIAN K. SCHRAMM POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian 

7 K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1595 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Calendar No. 68 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1595 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. ester, New York, as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm al Service located at 3245 Latta Road in RochMAY 20, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 2556.350 What matters are considered grievances? ( a ) Under the VISTA program grievance procedure, grievances are matters of concern, brought by a VISTA, that arise out of, and directly affect, the VISTA's service situation or that arise out of a violation of a policy, practice, or regulation governing the terms or conditions of the VISTA's service, that result in the denial or infringement of a right or benefit to the VISTA member.
( b ) Matters not within the definition of a grievance as defined in paragraph (a) of this section are not grievable, and therefore, are excluded from the VISTA program grievance procedure. Though not exhaustive, examples of matters excluded from the VISTA program grievance procedure are: ( 1 ) Matters related to a sponsor's or project's continuance or discontinuance; the number of VISTAs assigned to a VISTA project; the increases or decreases in the level of support provided to a VISTA project; the suspension or termination of a VISTA project; or the selection or retention of VISTA project staff;
( 2 ) Matters for which a separate administrative procedure or complaint process is provided, such as early termination for cause, claims of discrimination during service, and Federal worker's compensation claims filed for illness or injury sustained in the course of carrying out VISTA activities;
( 3 ) Matters related to the content of any law, published rule, regulation, policy, or procedure;
( 4 ) Matters related to housing during a VISTA member's service;
( 5 ) Matters which are, by law, subject to final administrative review outside AmeriCorps;
( 6 ) Matters related to actions taken, or not taken, by a VISTA sponsor or subrecipient, or AmeriCorps, in compliance with or in order to fulfill the terms of a contract, grant, or other agreement related to the VISTA program; or
( 7 ) Matters related to the internal management of AmeriCorps, unless such matters are shown to specifically and directly affect the VISTA's service situation or terms or conditions of their VISTA service.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 18723          Scale: 25,000          Edition: 3          Edition Date: 22-NOV-97          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1998/11**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of HC Innovations, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Randazzo, Interim Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

|                     |                                 
|-------------------- | --------------------------------
|Date: July
 20, 2009 | By: /s/ John
 Randazzo          
|                     | John
 Randazzo                  
|                     | Interim
 Chief Executive Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
EX-4.5





 Exhibit 4.5 

AMENDMENT TO 
 AMENDED
AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is an amendment
to amend certain provisions of the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement dated November 19, 2019 (the “Restated Shareholders Agreement”). 
  

	1.	 Section 2.2 (a)(ii) of the Restated Shareholders Agreement shall be amended by deleting in its
entirety and replacing it with the following: 


 Tianjin Kangyue (so long as it continues to hold no less than 5% of all
the Ordinary Shares of the Company (calculated on a fully-diluted and an as-converted basis)) shall be entitled to appoint and remove one (1) director (the “Tianjin Kangyue Director”,
together with VIVO Director, the “Investor Directors”), which individual shall initially be Wu Xia; and 
  

	2.	 Section 2.2 (b) of the Restated Shareholders Agreement shall be amended by deleting in its entirety
and replacing it with the following: 


 Each Director shall have one (1) voting right on all matters that are
presented to the Board for approval. A meeting of directors is duly constituted for all purposes if at the commencement of the meeting there are present in person or by alternate not less than three (3) directors (including the Tianjin Kangyue
Director). The Company shall reimburse the directors for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending any meetings of the Board and any
committee thereof. 
  

	3.	 The following definitions shall be added into the Annex A (Definitions) of the Restated Shareholders Agreement:



 “Majority Investor Directors” shall mean at least fifty percent (50%) of Investor Directors; for
avoidance of doubt, when there is one Investor Director, “Majority Investor Director” shall mean such Investor Director. 

“Tianjin Kangyue Director” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2.2(a)(ii) of this Agreement.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 5, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20612 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE SWEAT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-368-5 

--------------------

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence

of Terrance Sweat. United States v. Sweat, No. 03-20612 (5th

Cir. Jun. 21, 2004) (unpublished). The Supreme Court vacated and

remanded for further consideration in light of United States v.

Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Sweat v. United States, 125 

S. Ct. 993 (2005). We requested and received supplemental letter

briefs addressing the impact of Booker. 
No. 03-20612 

-2-

Sweat contends that he is entitled to resentencing because

the district court sentenced him under a mandatory application of

the United States Sentencing Guidelines prohibited by Booker. 

This court will not consider a Booker-related challenge raised

for the first time in a petition for certiorari absent

extraordinary circumstances. United States v. Taylor,

 F.3d , No. 03-10167, 2005 WL 1155245 at *1 (5th Cir. May

17, 2005). Sweat identifies “no evidence in the record

suggesting that the district court would have imposed a lesser

sentence under an advisory guidelines system.” Id. (citing

United States v. Hernandez-Gonzalez, 405 F.3d 260, 261 (5th Cir.

2005); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 521-22 (5th Cir.),

petition for cert. filed (March 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517)). This

court has rejected the argument that a Booker error is a

structural error or that such error is presumptively prejudicial. 

Mares, 402 F.3d at 520-22; see also United States v. Malveaux,

___ F.3d ___, No. 03-41618, 2005 WL 1320362, *1 n.9 (5th Cir.

Apr. 11, 2005). Because Sweat has not demonstrated plain error,

“it is obvious that the much more demanding standard for

extraordinary circumstances, warranting review of an issue raised

for the first time in a petition for certiorari, cannot be

satisfied.” See Taylor, 2005 WL 1155245 at *1. 

Because nothing in the Supreme Court’s Booker decision

requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case, we

therefore reinstate our judgment affirming Sweat’s conviction and

sentence.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Flexible Solutions International Inc.
on form 10-Q for the period ended Sept 30th 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan O'Brien, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/ DAN O'BRIEN
Dan O'Brien
CEO, Nov 14th 2003






                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Flexible Solutions International Inc.
(the Company) on form 10-Q for the period ended Sept 30th 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan
O'Brien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/ DAN O'BRIEN
Dan O'Brien
CFO, Nov 14th 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

Date: November 14, 2007

---
AAM-10-274-E June 2, 2010 Exemption No. 10075 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0501

Mr. Corie Bennett Vice President and Chief Operating Officer JB Aviation, LLC

P.O. Box 625 Purchase, NY 10577

Dear Mr. Bennett:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 4, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of JB Aviation, LLC (JB Aviation) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow JB Aviation which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to JB Aviation.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant JB Aviation, LLC an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow JB Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of JB Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the JB Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Dr. Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure