alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

"The powor@ whloh the Comisrionen' 

'Court may bo aospsllod to oxeroirs are cl@- 

rima hi th6 c0nstitution io the bilowtag languagoi 
po8. ,a. aalnty Comm.l88iomsm’ 

Cleurt, -oh 8ball l xorol80 moh 

perrs and Juri8distion cm- all 

otmnty byslm88 a8 i8 oonfurod 

by this ~Goastltution and thr lawa 

or the State or a8 may be barafter pm8oribod.' Article 5,tko. 

18. 

Vhe power8 Ihloh the Lq$l8latun may requimstha to exerqlse qe oonrined br thlg 

a@at$olv;to: :oo9nff~~~~ss;':an~:;*r:~:thi@k t&t 

aliar '.&at thk', idiln5.8 ttit$ph O$ ~. t&al &fact8 

of a dl88olred oorporatlon and. the peymnt 

of Ita debt8 are not uuoh bu8lno8s." 

In Rdlmrd8 couqty v. Jennlxl&8, 83 6. ,?. 385, the 

ecurt said: 

In rSew 6f tbb8+ holdirrgs of our ocurt.8; we answer 

both of th8 above queirtion8 in the nwative. 

Your8 very truly 

ATTORNEY OEWlCRAL O? TEXAS 

ASR-W APPROVED JUL 5, 1939 

W. F. UOORB 

FIRST AssfsTAm 

ATTORWEY OA. S. Rolllnr 

Amistant
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-621 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and EL SALVADOR 

Signed at San Salvador October 25, 2002 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EL SALVADOR 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement signed at San Salvador October 25, 2002; 

 Entered into force June 21, 2004.
#### § 261.36 Do welfare reform waivers affect the calculation of a State's participation rates?

A welfare reform waiver could affect the calculation of a State's participation rate, pursuant to subpart C of part 260 and section 415 of the Act.
# National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, 2006

Each year, thousands of Americans lose their lives in accidents involving drunk and drugged driving. During National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, we continue our efforts to promote awareness of the dangers of impaired driving and encourage fellow citizens to never drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

All Americans can play an important role in preventing drunk and drugged driving. Family members can discuss the dangers of impaired driving; businesses, schools, and organizations in our communities can help spread the message of awareness; and individuals can help protect family and friends by identifying a designated driver. During the holiday season, it is especially important to encourage responsible driving and to help ensure the safety of friends and loved ones.

My Administration is committed to saving lives by stopping drunk and drugged drivers before they put themselves and others at risk. We continue to work with communities across our Nation to increase public awareness and prevention of this serious offense. The Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has partnered with State and local law enforcement agencies to carry out the campaign, “Drunk Driving. Over the Limit. Under Arrest.” This program aims to keep impaired drivers off our Nation's roads by creating new public education programs and toughening enforcement. The Office of National Drug Control Policy works to warn young drivers and their parents about the dangers of driving under the influence of drugs. My Administration is also supporting community and faith-based programs that encourage others to avoid the devastating consequences of impaired driving.

Every person has a responsibility to drive free of alcohol and drugs and to insist that friends and family do the same. By helping fight drunk and drugged driving, Americans everywhere can save lives and send a strong message that driving under the influence is not acceptable.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 2006 as National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month. I encourage all Americans to make responsible decisions and to help prevent drunk and drugged driving.                          ( print page 70852)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

[FR Doc. 06-9607

Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rings To Dine For, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jason Yabut, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: February 13, 2007

                                        By: /s/  Jason Yabut
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Jason Yabut
                                            Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Smoky Market Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward C. Feintech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Edward C. Feintech


Edward C. Feintech


Chief Executive Officer


April 15, 2010
§ 2507.22 Aggregating requests to ensure payment of fees. ( a ) When AmeriCorps reasonably believes that a requester or a group of requesters acting together is attempting to divide a single request into multiple smaller requests so as to avoid fees, AmeriCorps may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly. ( 1 ) AmeriCorps may presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30-day period have been made in order to avoid fees.
( 2 ) For requests separated by more than 30 days, AmeriCorps will aggregate them only where there is a reasonable basis for determining that aggregation is justified in view of all the circumstances involved.
( b ) Multiple requests involving unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
Hillsborough,

No. 5831.

#### Rita G. Lemay. *v.*Lionel A. Lemay.

Argued October 1, 1968.

Decided October 31, 1968.

*Louis P. Faustini*( by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*Lemieux & Si. Pierre (Mr. Robert A. St. Pierre*orally), for the defendant.

Duncan, J.

The plaintiff’s petition for a legal separation upon grounds of extreme cruelty was denied by the Trial Court *(Loughlin,*J.), and custody of the two youngest minor children of the parties was awarded to the defendant father. The plaintiff’s motion to set aside the decree “ as being against the weight of the evidence and the law ” was denied subject to exception, and the questions presented by her exception were transferred by the Presiding Justice.

The only issue raised before this court is the validity of the order of custody of the two younger sons of the parties, who were six and nine years of age when the order was entered. At the hearing the father testified that since he worked during the daytime hours, it would be necessary for him to place these children in the care of an orphanage; and at arguments It was stated by counsel that this had been done.

*218The authority of the Court to make an order of custody of the children of parents who are living apart is well established (RSA 458:35 ), and may be exercised even though a divorce or separation is denied. *Trow*v. *Trow,*95 N. H. 529; *Stetson*v. *Stetson,*103 N. H. 290. See also, *Benjamin*v. *Benjamin,*99 N. H. 117. The plaintiff urges that because of the tender years of the children, custody should have been granted to her, in preference to the order made which has resulted in their being placed in “ impersonal ” surroundings, where their contact with their parents is confined largely to week-ends.

It is elementary that custody orders rest in the discretion of the Trial Court, and that “the paramount and controlling consideration ” is the welfare of the children involved. *Clark*v. *Clark,*96 N. H. 443, 444. In the case at bar there was evidence that the mother’s employment caused her frequent absence from the home at night, and that the two older children of the parties, aged nineteen and seventeen, had both been in difficulties suggestive of their incompetence to care for their younger brothers in the absence of the parents. It appeared that the nine-year old boy had “learning difficulties” which required special schooling. Much of the testimony related to the plaintiff’s conduct as a mother and wife.

The Trial Court could properly find upon the record that the welfare of the children required that they “ be under the supervision and guidance of the steadier hand of [their] father, ” (*Clark*v. *Clark, supra,*445) as against the supervision and care which they would probably receive if custody were entrusted to the mother. No magic formula exists by which the salvaging of human values can best be attained where a home is divided. Comments, Selected Essays on Family Law, 607, 620. The order made cannot be said to be against the weight of the evidence.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel., Waclark Realty Company, Appellant, *v.*Frank A. O’Donnel et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents.

*People ex rel. Waclark Realty Oo.*v. *O’Donnel,*130 App. Div. 880, affirmed.

(Argued October 5, 1909;

decided October 19, 1909.)

. Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 22, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari to review an assessment for taxation against certain real property of relator.

*Edward L. Blackmam,*for appellant.

*Francis E.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (David Bumsey*and *William E. King*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 29, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-465

Lower Tribunal No. F94-36429

________________

Andre Burke,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard Hersch, Judge.

Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, and Richard L. Rosenbaum (Fort 

Lauderdale), for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) All-24 

RepublicanParty of Iowa ) Agenda Documents No. 14-13 and No. 

) 14-13-A 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission 

open meeting on March 06,2014, do hereby certify that the Coimnission decided by a vote of 6-

0 to approve Agenda Document No. 14-13-A, the Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Republican Party of Iowa. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Order entered June 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00930-CR

ALICE ANNETTE STEELE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F08-45120-M

ORDER

Appellant’s June 12, 2014 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief and to 

accept contemporaneously tendered brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief received by the 

Clerk of the Court on June 12, 2014 is DEEMED timely filed on the date of this order.

The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.2 Amendment No. 2 dated May 29, 2020 to Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 15, 2019 by and between the Registrant and Somahlution, LLC et al.


 

AMENDMENT 2 to the ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT Dated May 29, 2020

 

WHEREAS, Somahlution and Marizyme both wish to amend their Asset Purchase Agreement by replacing Sections 3(e ) and 9(a and b) in their entirety with new Sections 3(e ) and 9(a and b) below.

 

Somahlutions and Marizyme mutually agree to replacing Sections 3(e ) and 9(a and b) in their entirety with new Sections 3(e ) and 9(a and b) as per the following:

 

3e. Fundraising. With the assistance of Seller, Buyer shall have secured $5 Million in funding closing concurrently with the Closing under this Agreement 

 

9. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Closing:

 

(a)by the mutual written consent of Seller and Buyer; 

 

(b)by either Party if the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are not consummated by July 30, 2020, which date shall be automatically extended if short term funding is arranged for up to an additional 30 days if and as required (the “Drop-Dead Date”) and further by mutual agreement;  

 

Marizyme and Somahlutions agree to continue their efforts to raise additional funds after the closing.

 

Marizyme also agrees to cover the outstanding PI fees after funds are raised.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement as of the date written below.

 

	SOMAHLUTION LLC

	 

	Marizyme, Inc.


	(“Somahlution”)

	 

	(“Marizyme”)


	 

	 

	 


	By:

	/s/ Satish Chandran 

	 

	By:

	/s/ Nicholas DeVito


	Title:

	CEO

	 

	Title:

	CEO


	Date:

	March 31, 2020

	 

	Date:

	March 31, 2020




 

Amendment 1 – Asset Purchase Agreement – Marizyme and Somahlutions
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 2012 ) 

Tampa Bay Host Committee, Inc. ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on August 01,2014, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Rq)ort on the 

2012 Tampa Bay Host Committee, Inc., as recommended in the Memorandum 

from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated July 29,2014. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

M (^IMJ imhuti 

Shawn Woodhead Werdi 

Secretary and Clerk of the C
**MARKETWATCH.COM, INC.**
CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of MarketWatch.com, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2003 (the"Report"), I, Joan P. Platt, the Chief Financial Officer****of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

	(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

	(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany at the dates and for the periods indicated therein.  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, ackonwledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears intyped form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed"with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2003
By:	/s/ Joan P. Platt    Joan P. Platt, Chief Financial Officer
From: herbert@herbertrosenthal.com To: Finamore, Robert (OST) ; Herbert ROSENTHAL Subject: Re: Transportes Aeromar Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:35:19 PM

I got an email this evening from Aeromar approving your analysis and proposed grant of authority. Please put this email exchange in the docket. Thanks for your assistance
Herbert a. Rosenthal Counsel for Transportes Aeromar ------Original Message------ From: Robert.Finamore@dot.gov To: Herbert ROSENTHAL Subject: RE: Transportes Aeromar Sent: Jan 25, 2012 5:05 PM Herb, I'm working my way back through the various Aeromar applications that are pending in Docket 1995- 379/2005-20954 and just wanted to check in with you one last time as I prepare to move forward. I understand that Aeromar wishes only to renew its San Luis Potosi/Manzanillo-San Antonio authority and wants grant of the standalone Saltillo-San Antonio authority that it was recently designated for. I also assume the carrier wants renewal of its charter authority. With respect to all of the other authority that had previously been granted to Aeromar in the docket by Notices dated 6/22/05 and 11/2/05, we plan to dismiss that authority based upon Aeromar's confirmation to you that indicated as much. That would include any other markets in which Aeromar had previously held authority to operate with its own aircraft, as well as the code-share authority it previously held with Aeromexico in OST-2005-20954. As a result, Aeromar would then only hold exemption authority in the San Luis Potosi/Manzanillo-San Antonio markets, the Saltillo-San Antonio market, and charter authority. Upon confirmation I'll place a copy of the e-mail in the Dockets so that the record will be updated accordingly. Regards, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Herbert Rosenthal [ mailto:herbert@herbertrosenthal.com ] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:16 PM To: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: RE: Transportes Aeromar
Thanks. Have a good evening. -----Original Message----- From: Robert.Finamore@dot.gov [ mailto:Robert.Finamore@dot.gov ] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:15 PM To: herbert@herbertrosenthal.com Subject: RE: Transportes Aeromar I believe it will Herb, I'll look at it further tomorrow and be in touch if there are any other issues.
Bob________________________________________ From: Herbert Rosenthal [herbert@herbertrosenthal.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:08 PM To: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: Transportes Aeromar Aeromar has sent me the following in response to your email: \ Aeromar wishes only to renew its San Luis Potosi/Manzanillo-San Antonio authority and wants grant of standalone Saltillo-San Antonio authority"
Will that help things along??
Thanks.
Herb Rosenthal
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-06-062]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

December 15, 2006 at 11 a.m.

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status:

Open to the public.

## Matters To Be Considered

                    1.                     *Agenda for future meetings:*                     none.                

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-444-446 and 731-TA-1107-1109 (Preliminary)(Coated Free Sheet Paper from China, Indonesia, and Korea)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on December 15, 2006; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 22, 2006.).

                    5.                     *Outstanding action jackets:*                     none.                

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 4, 2006.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9578 Filed 12-4-06; 11:43 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P