alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2522.465 What information must a State commission submit on the relative strengths of applicants for State competitive funding?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at [89 FR 46034](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-46034), May 28, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a correction published at [89 FR 66615](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-66615), Aug. 16, 2024.

(a) If you are a State commission applying for State competitive funding, you must prioritize the proposals you submit in rank order based on their relative quality and according to the following table:

| If you submit this number of state competitive proposals to the corporation | Then you must rank this number of proposals |
| --- | --- |
| 1 to 12 | At least top 5. |
| 13 to 24 | At least top 10. |
| 25 or more | At least top 15. |

(b) While the rankings you provide will not be determinative in the grant selection process, and the Corporation will not be bound by them, we will consider them in our selection process.

[[70 FR 39600](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-39600), July 8, 2005]
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS73819 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GEORGE S. HARGER,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

SLOAN D. GIBSON, ACTING SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-7086

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 12-3092, Judge Robert N. Davis.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

George S. Harger moves for leave to file his informal 

brief out of time.

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. Harger’s informal brief is 

accepted for filing. The Secretary should calculate the 

due date for his response brief from the date of filing of 

this order.

Case: 14-7086 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2014
2 HARGER v. GIBSON

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s25

Case: 14-7086 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 07/15/2014
Exhibit 31.1
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert C. Woodworth, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pulitzer Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 2, 2005
/s/ Robert C. Woodworth
#### People *ex rel.*Coyle v. Sherwood *et al.*

*Judicial office—title to—collateral proceeding—validity of acts of judge.*

On a certiorari issued to review the conviction of the relator for assault and battery, in a court whose judges were claimed to have been appointed under an unconstitutional enactment, held, that the judges, if not such *de jure,*were such *defacto,*with color of title, and their acts must he respected until judgment of ouster is pronounced against them. The authority of the judges cannot he inquired into in a collateral proceeding.

The statute (Laws of 1873, chap. 538) relating to the police courts of New York city is constitutional.

Wbit oe cebtiobabi issued to review the conviction of the relator, George Ooyle, for assault and battery, in the court of special sessions *35of Yew York city. The respondents, Thomas D. Sherwood and others, were appointed police justices of the city of Yew York, under Laws of 1873, chapter 583. The prisoner’s counsel claimed that the act under which the justices were appointed was unconstitutional, and that, therefore, they had no jurisdiction of the offense.

*Albert Gardozo*and *William F. Howe,*for relator."

Benj. *K. Phelps,*district attorney, for respondents.

Brady, J.

The answer which may properly be made to the points presented on behalf of the relator is, that the police justices, if not such *de jure,*are such *de facto,*with color of title, and their acts must be obeyed and respected until judgment of ouster is pronounced against them. Having apparent authority to act, and having rendered judgment between the prisoner and the people, neither can, in this collateral way, call in question the title of the judges.

Yo principle is better settled, than that the acts of such persons are valid when they concern the public. Justice Bronson said: “ It would be impossible to maintain the supremacy of the laws, if individuals were at liberty, in this collateral manner, to question the authority of those who, in fact, hold public offices.” *People*v. *White,*34 Wend. 525; *Nelson*v. *People,*23 N. Y. 293. If the objection were, that, assuming the validity of the tribunal whose acts are questioned, the subject-matter was not within its jurisdiction, the question would be one doubtless for consideration. Such is not the case herein. If, however, the relator were right in presenting his objections in the manner adopted, he is nevertheless not entitled to the relief he demands. The points which are urged by him for our consideration, affecting the title of the justices who presided at the special sessions, and to the organization of the court in which they sat and pronounced judgment, have recently been under consideration, in the court of Common Pleas of this county, in an action in the nature of *quo warranto, People ex rel. Hogan*v. *Morgan,*and have been decided adversely to him, by an exhaustive and elaborate opinion delivered by Chief Justice Daly. See 5th Daly.

In the conclusion arrived at in that court, we concur. We think the writ should therefore be dismissed.

Daniels and Westbrook, JJ., concurred.

*Writ dismissed.*
/ 

0042. Comments covering the accuracy of this burden and suggest

o

g 

Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591. ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AESR200. 

U. S. Identification 

AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP FOR AMATEUR-BUILT AND OTHER 

NON-TYPE CERTIFICATED AIRCRAFT 

(does not include light-sport) 

Name of Amateur /Non TC'd builder DJI Innovations -------------------------------

Model Inspire 1 Serial Number W13DCA04020679 

Class (airplane, rotorcraft, glider, weight shift 

control, powered-parachute, etc.) Rotorcraft - LtAS 

Type of Engine Installed (reciprocating, turboprop, 2 or 4 cycle, electric, etc.) Electric 

Manufacturer, Model and Serial Number of each Engine Installed DJ I Model 351 0 ----------------------------

Serial# N/A Number ofEngines Installed 4 ------

Built for Land or Sea Operation Land and Sea Number of Seats _0 ________________ _ 

MUST CHECK ONE 

D More than 50% of the aboveRdescribed aircraft was built from miscellaneous parts and I am the owner. (This option is for aircraft 

eligible for amateurRbuilt certification.) 

0 More than 50% of the above..clescribed aircraft was built from a kit (prefabricated parts) and I am the owner. The bill of sale from 

the kit manufacturer is attached. (This option is for aircraft eligible for amateurRbuilt certification.) 

0 I certify that the aboveRdescribed aircraft is a newly built non-type certificated aircraft and is not currently registered in another 

country. (This option is for aircraft eligible for experimental certification other than amateur-built.) 

0 I certify that the above-described aircraft is a previously built (used) non-type certificated aircraft and is not currently registered in another country. (This option is for aircraft eligible for experimental certification other than amateurRbuilt certification.) D Evidence of ownership from the aircraft builder through any intervening owners is attached (chain of ownership). D Unable to obtain complete chain of ownership. Statement as to ownership history and whereabouts of aircraft is attached. 

Name of Owner: Daniel Harry 

----~--------------------

Signature of Owner: 

Address: 2215 Repsdorph RD. 

City: Seabrook 

Telephone: 281-326-1800 

Notary Public: 

__,--

State of: / e.y:a.$ 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 

State: TX 

County ofi 

d "ell 

My Commission ExJ?ires: C)3-/Lf - 02-0/7 

v.» 

-~ H!e.AJt" l 

Title of Signer 

(If Appropriate): President ----------

Zip: 77586 

/-ta.rr~sday of Fetor-w.tr'-{ 016/.S- u 

~''''''''''''''''''''''~"~ i .'b.<t-~.?u,., l! ... t,..-:~ ,,_\.l-!1 i 

-,-a:~~·-

-~-<..... 

• -·----- -·R-- ..... ~ ! ;\it~~ Commission Expires i ! 

-- 

--·- !:
§ 284.10 What does this part cover? ( a ) This part describes the methodology for determining the child poverty rates in the States and the Territories, as required by section 413(i) of the Social Security Act, including determining whether the child poverty rate increased by five percent or more as a result of the TANF program(s) in the State or Territory. It also describes the content and duration of the corrective action plan.
( b ) The requirements of this part do not apply to any Territory that has never operated a TANF program.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the                           ( print page 75263)                        provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group, Clinical and Treatment Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         March 1-2, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Katrina L. Foster, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3042, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-4032.                         *katrina@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health,  HHS)

Dated: December 7, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9707 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 2523.120 Must Federal agencies consult with State Commissions?

Yes. Federal agencies must provide a description of the manner in which the proposed AmeriCorps program(s) is coordinated with the application of the State in which the projects will be conducted. Agencies must also describe proposed efforts to coordinate AmeriCorps activities with State Commissions and other funded AmeriCorps programs within the State in order to build upon existing programs and not duplicate efforts.
§ 2555.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 2555.225 and 2555.230, and §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310 .* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 2555.300 through 2555.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
#### §§ 2490.171-2490.999 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 304
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 304 appear at 64 FR 6252, Feb. 9, 1999.

§ 304.30 Public sources of State's share. ( a ) Public funds, other than those derived from private resources, used by the IV-D agency for its child support enforcement program may be considered as the State's share in claiming Federal reimbursement where such funds are: ( 1 ) Appropriated directly to the IV-D agency; or
( 2 ) Funds of another public agency which are: ( i ) Transferred to the IV-D agency and are under its administrative control; or
( ii ) Certified by the contributing public agency as representing expenditures under the State's IV-D plan, subject to the limitations of this part.
( b ) Public funds used by the IV-D agency for its child support enforcement program may not be considered as the State's share in claiming Federal reimbursement where such funds are: ( 1 ) Federal funds, unless authorized by Federal law to be used to match other Federal funds;
( 2 ) Used to match other Federal funds.
[41 FR 7105, Feb. 17, 1976]