alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 155.730 Application standards for SHOP for plan year beginning prior to January 1, 2018. ( a ) *General requirements.* Application forms used by the SHOP must meet the requirements set forth in this section.
( b ) *Single employer application.* The SHOP must use a single application to determine employer eligibility and to collect information necessary for purchasing coverage. Such application must collect the following— ( 1 ) Employer name and address of employer's locations;
( 2 ) Number of employees;
( 3 ) Employer Identification Number (EIN); and
( 4 ) A list of qualified employees and their taxpayer identification numbers.
( c ) *Single employee application.* The SHOP must use a single application for eligibility determination, QHP selection and enrollment for qualified employees and their dependents.
( d ) *Model application.* The SHOP may use the model single employer application and the model single employee application provided by HHS.
( e ) *Alternative employer and employee application.* The SHOP may use an alternative application if such application is approved by HHS and collects the following: ( 1 ) In the case of the employer application, the information in described in paragraph (b); and
( 2 ) In the case of the employee application, the information necessary to establish eligibility of the employee as a qualified employee and to complete the enrollment of the qualified employee and any dependents to be enrolled.
( f ) *Filing.* The SHOP must: ( 1 ) Accept applications from SHOP application filers; and
( 2 ) Provide the tools to file an application via an Internet Web site.
( g ) *Additional safeguards.* ( 1 ) The SHOP may not provide to the employer any information collected on the employee application with respect to spouses or dependents other than the name, address, and birth date of the spouse or dependent.
( 2 ) The SHOP is not permitted to collect information on the single employer or single employee application unless that information is necessary to determine SHOP eligibility or effectuate enrollment through the SHOP.
( h ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section apply for plan years beginning prior to January 1, 2018. Section 155.731 is applicable for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018.
[77 FR 18464, Mar. 27, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 54141, Aug. 30, 2013; 79 FR 13839, Mar. 11, 2014; 83 FR 17066, Apr. 17, 2018]
#### Howard *v.*The State.

Submitted July 16,

Decided August 17, 1906.

Beck, J.

When in the trial of one charged with the violation of the act of 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 90), providing for the punishment of those who with fraudulent intent procure advances on the faith of contracts of labor, it appears from uncontradieted evidence that the accused was a minor and that the failure on his part to perform the services required under the contract was due to the fact that his father had directed him to leave the service and return home in order that he might perform labor under a contract which the father had made, the presumption of fraudulent intent, arising from the fact that money was procured on the faith of the. contract and the service not rendered or the money returned, is rebutted, and a conviction of the accused is contrary to law.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*

*539Accusation of cheating, etc. Before Judge Little. City court of Sparta. June 4, 1906.

*Williford & MiddlebrooTes,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W. Moore, solicitor,*and *R. H. Lewis,*contra.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

                            [BEYOND.COM LETTERHEAD]

October 26, 2000

Barry Shotts
3135 Pacific Avenue, No. 4
San Francisco, Ca 94115

Dear Barry:

This letter will confirm your promotion as well as outline your new compensation
package. These changes will be effective and retroactive October 1, 2000.
Details are as follows.

     1.   Title. Your new title will be Vice President of Business Development.

     2.   Annual Base Salary. Your annual base salary will be increased to
          $200,000.

     3.   Annual Bonus. Your annual bonus at target will be $75,000.00, paid
          quarterly with no cap, and based on the achievement of objectives
          which you and I will determine in good faith. A copy of Q4 2000
          Objectives is attached for your information.

     4.   Stock Option. The company intends to grant you a stock option to
          purchase 150,000 shares of the company's common stock. One quarter
          (1/4) of the option shares (37,500) will become exercisable after you
          have completed the next six (6) months of employment with the company,
          and, thereafter one twenty-forth (1/24) of the option shares
          (6,250.00) will become exercisable following each month you remain
          employed by the company. The grant of the stock options will be
          subject to the other terms and provisions of the company's stock
          option plan and stock option agreement and the satisfaction of all
          federal and state securities laws.

     5.   Severance. For purposes of this offer letter, any act by you involving
          fraud, willful malfeasance or similar wrongful acts, or willful and
          continuing neglect of your duties to the real and substantial
          prejudice of the company, after notice of such, shall be grounds for
          you to be "Terminated For Cause." If you are terminated for any other
          reason, you shall be deemed "Terminated Without Cause." In the event
          that you are terminated without cause, the Company will pay you as
          agreed upon severance a lump sum one-time payment amount equal to six
          (6) months of your then base salary and actual bonus.


<PAGE>   2

Barry Shotts (cont.)                   2                              Beyond.com


Once again, I congratulate you on the promotion and look forward to your
continued contributions.

Sincerely,

/s/ RON HULSE
-------------------------------------
Ron Hulse
Sr. Vice President, Sales & Marketing


Agreed and Accepted:

/s/ BARRY SHOTTS                        Date: 11/1/00
-------------------------                    --------
Barry Shotts
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-06-060]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

December 12, 2006 at 11 a.m.

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status:

Open to the public.

## Matters To Be Considered

                    1.                     *Agenda for future meetings:*                     none.                

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-891 (Review)(Foundry Coke from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 29, 2006.). 

                    5.                     *Outstanding action jackets:*                     none.                

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 4, 2006.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9579 Filed 12-4-06; 11:43 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

99–011 2010

111th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 111–153 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO IRAN 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT 

TO IRAN ORIGINALLY DECLARED ON NOVEMBER 14, 1979, BY 

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12170, IS TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT BEYOND 

NOVEMBER 14, 2010, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d) 

NOVEMBER 16, 2010.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, DC, November 10, 2010. 

Hon. NANCY PELOSI, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary 

date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register 

for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency with respect to Iran that was declared in Executive Order 

12170 of November 14, 1979, is to continue in effect beyond November 14, 2010. 

Our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the 

process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with 

Iran is still underway. For these reasons, I have determined that 

it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, with respect to Iran, beyond November 14, 2010. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

IRAN

On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President 

declared a national emergency with respect to Iran, pursuant to 

the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 

1701–1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to 

the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States constituted by the situation in Iran. Because our relations 

with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with Iran is still underway, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, 

must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2010. Therefore, consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year this national emergency 

with respect to Iran. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 10, 2010. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
H|S|M 

Law Offices of Heather SIdwell Morris, P.A. 

May 2,2014 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director, Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: CPA Response to Draft Final Audit Report 

Dear Mr. Hintermister: 

The Committee on Arrangements for the 2012 Republican National Convention ("COA") is in 

receipt of your April 14,2014 letter enclosing the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR"). 

The COA has no additional comments concerning the DFAR and accordingly will not be 

requesting a hearing in this matter. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 

(202) 680-8833. 

Respectfully, 

Heather Sidwell Morris 

Counsel to the Committee on Arrangements 

for the 2012 Republican National Convention 

cc: Robert Morcomb 

Alex Boniewicz 

P.O. Box 173207 | Tampa, FL 33672 

202-680-88331 www.hsmcounsel.com
#### Slawson v. Albany Railway, appellant.

*Contract of sale*— *construction of.*

On the 1st of February, 1869, an agreement was made between the parties, by which the plaintiff agreed to furnish fare-boxes, etc., for the defendant’s cars (fourteen in number), at $165 for each car, to be paid for in one year after being placed in the cars, or, in lieu thereof, the boxes were to be returned within the year. The defendant also agreed to conform to certain conditions and requirements as to the mode of using such fare-boxes, etc., and was to order such fare-boxes, etc., as were wanted. Seven were so ordered and delivered prior to April 1,1869, and no others were ordered or supplied. The defendant, failing to comply with the plaintiff’s terms and conditions, in respect to the use of the boxes, etc., the latter refused to supply any more, unless the terms and conditions were complied with. At that time the defendant had not offered to return the boxes, etc., delivered; *Held,*(1) that the boxes were deliverable only when ordered, and by the neglect of the defendant to order them, the plaintiff was excused from tendering performance; (2) that the sale was conditional, or upon trial, and the defendant had no right to a year’s use of the boxes before the sale became absolute, and then only by a failure of the defendant to return; (8) that if the defendant wished to avoid paying for the seven boxes, they should have been returned before the end of the year given for that purpose; (4) that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the contract price of the boxes delivered and not returned, rather than upon a *quantum meruit;*(5) that the price of the seven boxes became due at the end of a year from the time they were put in the cars, upon a failure to return them, and upon an unreasonable neglect on the part of the defendant to perform the contract; (6) that the defendant had a reasonable time in which to order and take the boxes ; and whether it neglected to do so within a reasonable time was a question of fact for the referee to determine; and (7) that proof of the plaintiff’s readiness and willingness to furnish the remainder of the boxes was competent.

Apeeal from a judgment in fayor of plaintiff, John B. Slawson, entered upon the report of a referee.

*Matthew Hale,*for appellant.

*Grenville Tremain,*for respondent.

Boardman, J.

The opinion reviews the facts in the case. The head-note contains all that is important in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 2524.30 What are the guidelines for challenge grants? ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of these grants is to challenge high quality AmeriCorps programs to diversify their funding base by matching private dollars they have raised with Corporation support. The Corporation will provide not more than $1 for each $1 raised in cash by the program from private sources in excess of amounts otherwise required to be provided by the program to satisfy the matching funds requirements specified under § 2521.30(g) of this chapter.
( b ) *Eligibility.* Only Corporation grantees that meet all of the following eligibility criteria may apply for challenge grants: ( 1 ) They are funded under parts 2520 through 2523 of this chapter.
( 2 ) They are high quality programs with demonstrated experience in establishing and implementing projects that provide benefits to participants and communities.
( 3 ) They have operated with Corporation funds for at least six months.
( 4 ) They have secured the minimum matching funds required by §§ 2521.30(g), 2522.240(b)(6), 2522.250(a)(4), and 2522.250(b)(2) of this chapter.
( c ) *Allowable program activities.* Challenge grants are intended to provide special opportunities for national and community service programs to enroll additional participants or undertake other activities specified by the Corporation.
( d ) *Application procedures.* Eligible applicants must comply with the requirements specified in the Corporation's application materials.
( e ) *Limitation on use of the funds.* Each year the Corporation will establish a maximum award that a program may receive as a challenge grant.
( f ) *Allocation of funds.* The Corporation will determine annually how much funding will be allocated to challenge grants from funds appropriated for AmeriCorps programs.
[59 FR 13805, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 53760, Sept. 17, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 9 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.9

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule 
 for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for 
               the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating 
to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-
Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Northern 
Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the Southern 
Distinct Population Segment'' (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 25, 2022)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
April 19, 2000
<P>
Richard I. Anslow, Esq.
4400 Route 9, 2nd Floor
Freehold, New Jersey 07728
<P>
     Re:     Agreement between Segway VIII Corp. and
             Richard I. Anslow
<P>
Dear Mr. Anslow:
<P>
The following sets forth the agreement between Segway VIII
Corp. ("SEGWAY") and Richard I. Anslow ("ANSLOW"):
<P>
     1.  ANSLOW agrees to purchase 4,000,000 restricted
common shares of SEGWAY at the value of $.0001 per share for
a purchase price of $500.00.
<P>
     2.  Upon the receipt of $500.00, SEGWAY will tender the
shares from treasury to ANSLOW.
<P>
     3.  ANSLOW represents that he is an "accredited
investor" as defined under the 1933 Securities Act.  In
addition, ANSLOW has been provided with access to all
documents of SEGWAY and has signed a subscription agreement
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
<P>
     4.  Notice shall be given by certified mail, return
receipt requested, the date of notice being deemed the date
of postmarking.  Notices, unless either party has notified
the other party of an alternative address as provided
hereunder, shall be sent to the address set forth herein.
<P>
     5.  In the event that any term, covenant, condition, or
other provision contained herein is held to be invalid, void
or otherwise unenforceable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the invalidity of any such term, covenant,
condition, provision or Agreement shall in no way affect
any other term, covenant, condition or provision or Agreement
contained herein, which shall remain in full force and
effect.
<P>
     6.  This Agreement contains all of the terms agreed
upon by the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.  This Agreement has been entered into after full
investigation.
<P>
     7.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of New Jersey
applicable to agreements made and to be performed within the
State of New Jersey without giving the effect to the
conflict of law principals thereof.
<P>
     8.  No amendments or additions to this Agreement shall
be binding unless in writing, signed by both parties, except
as herein otherwise provided.
<P>
     9.  Neither party may assign nor delegate any of its
rights or obligations hereunder without first obtaining the
written consent of the other party.
<P>
Very truly yours,
<P>
RICHARD I. ANSLOW & ASSOCIATES
<P>
By: /s/ Ross A. Goldstein
--------------------------------
     ROSS A. GOLDSTEIN
<P>
RAG/tp
<P>
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:        ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:
<P>
SEGWAY VIII CORP.
<P>
By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow   By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow
--------------------------  ------------------------------
        RICHARD I. ANSLOW           RICHARD I. ANSLOW
        Secretary
<P>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1564 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1564

  To designate the headquarters building of the Embassy of the United 
 States in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, as the ``Mickey Leland United States 
                          Embassy Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2009

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the headquarters building of the Embassy of the United 
 States in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, as the ``Mickey Leland United States 
                          Embassy Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The headquarters building of the Embassy of the United States in 
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, shall be known and designated as the ``Mickey 
Leland United States Embassy Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the headquarters building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mickey Leland 
United States Embassy Building''.
                                 <all>
```