alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc.  (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 18th   day of August 2006.    ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION  /s/ Pauline Schneider ----------------------- Name: Pauline Schneider Title: Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit31.02****CERTIFICATIONS**I, S. Craig Huke, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Double-Take Software, Inc. for the yearending December 31, 2006;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 29, 2007           /s/ S. Craig Huke         S. Craig Huke    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)
§ 2506.12 Will the Corporation provide information to credit reporting agencies? ( a ) The Corporation will report certain delinquent debts to appropriate consumer credit reporting agencies by providing the following information: ( 1 ) A statement that the debt is valid and overdue;
( 2 ) The name, address, taxpayer identification number, and any other information necessary to establish the identity of the debtor;
( 3 ) The amount, status, and history of the debt; and
( 4 ) The program or pertinent activity under which the debt arose.
( b ) Before disclosing debt information to a credit reporting agency, the Corporation: ( 1 ) Takes reasonable action to locate the debtor if a current address is not available;
( 2 ) Provides the notice required under § 2506.14(a) if a current address is available; and
( 3 ) Obtains satisfactory assurances from the credit reporting agency that it complies with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*) and other Federal laws governing the provision of credit information.
( c ) At the time debt information is submitted to a credit reporting agency, the Corporation provides a written statement to the reporting agency that all required actions have been taken. In addition, the Corporation thereafter ensures that the credit reporting agency is promptly informed of any substantive change in the conditions or amount of the debt, and promptly verifies or corrects information relevant to the debt.
( d ) If a debtor disputes the validity of the debt, the credit reporting agency refers the matter to the appropriate Corporation official. The credit reporting agency excludes the debt from its reports until the Corporation certifies in writing that the debt is valid.
( e ) The Corporation may disclose to a commercial credit bureau information concerning a commercial debt, including the following: ( 1 ) Information necessary to establish the name, address, and employer identification number of the commercial debtor;
( 2 ) The amount, status, and history of the debt; and
( 3 ) The program or pertinent activity under which the debt arose.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 25, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARCO FIMBRES 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

-·:' 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014WP070124) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the at!§,~d Service List. 

/,/···/' -...,) __ ..... ····· ......... . 

Attachment - Service List 

I / ~/ ' 

\_ ____ ..... k~~e A. Yo~er Chief Administrative 1,;aW:' Judge 

/ 

/ 

~ 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Marco A. Fimbres, Respondent 

4444 East Benson Highway, Trlr 21 

Tucson, AZ 85706 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 .6 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FPC(: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FPC(: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance wth the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical and Treatment Subcommittee Member Conflict.                    

*Date:*                         January 12, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project Branch Review, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3039, Rockville, MD 20852. 301-443-9743.                         *bautistaa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institues of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 27, 2006.

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9482 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-501.4 

________________________________________________________________________ 

COMPACT OF FREE ASSOCIATION 

Status of Forces 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the MARSHALL ISLANDS 

Signed at Majuro April 30, 2003 

 with 

Agreed Minutes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MARSHALL ISLANDS 

 

 Compact of Free Association: Status of Forces 

 Agreement signed at Majuro April 30, 2003; 

 Entered into force May 1, 2004. 

 With agreed minutes.
1

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-4079

___________

Matthew Harker, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: April 23, 2004

Filed: May 18, 2004

___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Harker appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1

for the Western District of Missouri denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) and concluding that his complaint allegations were legally frivolous. Upon

careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying IFP status, or err in concluding that Harker’s fanciful complaint allegations

were frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. 47A(a). 

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-90694, 333-87374, 333-57168, 333-45900, 333-25869, 33-
73130, 33-80799, 33-73120, 333-63167, 33-74402, 333-75674, 333-108663, 333-
120066 and 333-125824) on Form S-8 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-
41207, 333-21025, 333-10423, 333-30460, 333-71236 and 333-108048) on Form S-3 of
SPSS Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2006 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of SPSS Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005, and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule, and our report dated March 3, 2006
with respect to management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports
appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPSS Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005.

                                        /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 3, 2006
§ 1632.3 Prohibition. ( a ) Neither the Corporation nor any recipient shall make available any funds, personnel, or equipment for use in advocating or opposing any plan or proposal, or representing any party, or participating in any other way in litigation, related to redistricting.
( b ) This part does not prohibit any litigation brought by a recipient under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1971 *et seq.,* provided such litigation does not involve redistricting.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 05, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 05, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0345. IN THE INTEREST OF M. T. S. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2300384 2300385
#### Greene v. Mayor, etc., of the City of New York, appellants.

*New York City—Contracts for work made without adm'tising for sealed proposals.*

Chapter.383, Laws of 1870, § 6, authorizing the comptroller of the city of New York to borrow $500,000 for the improvement of the lower reservoir and for increasing the supply .of water in the lower part of the city, under the direction of the Department of Public Works, vests no *discretion*in the commissioner, in regard to contracts for work, dispensing with bids. Contracts made by him for work under that section, without advertising for or inviting sealed proposals, as required by § 104, chap. 137, Laws of 1870, are therefore invalid. *Nrnarro*v. *Van Nort,*64 Barb. 305, distinguished.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury.

John B. Greene brought this action to recover for work done for the defendants under a contract with the Department of' Public Works. Defendant objected that it was made without advertising for sealed proposals, as required by sec. 104, chap. 137, Laws of 1870.

*R. H. Strahan,*for respondent.

*E. D. Smith,*for appellants.

Donohue, J.

The head-note states the only points passed upon in the opinion.

*New trial granted.*
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Djou for Hawaii (DFH) 

(All-08) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

CojTunission, do hereby certify that on August 08,2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Djou for Hawaii (DFH) (AI 1-08), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and Audit Division dated 

July 27, 2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

(I Date Shawn Woodhead Werth 7 

Secretary and Clerk of the Comniission
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Toy R. 
Arnett, Jr., et al., No. 3:05cv270-RS, was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Northern District of Florida on November 
14, 2006.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Toy R. Arnett, Jr., Rena M. Arnett, the Nesius 
Family Limited Partnership, Rick D. Nesius, Shannon K. Nesius, and 
Faith Assembly Christian Church of Miramar Beach, Inc., pursuant to 
Sections 301 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, 
with respect to Defendants' alleged violations of the Clean Water Act 
at two sites by discharging pollutants into waters of the United States 
without or in violation of a permit. The proposed Consent Decree 
resolves these allegations by requiring the restoration of portions of 
the wetlands at issue, mitigation, and the payment of civil penalties. 
The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this 
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Martin F. 
McDermott, United States Department of Justice, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, 
Washington, DC 20026-3986 and refer to United States v. Toy R. Arnett, 
Jr., et al., DJ<greek-i>90-5-1-1-17459.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, 
United States Courthouse, 1 North Palafox Street, Pensacola, Florida 
32502. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9352 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 10.06

      

       

      

      Commitment Letter Regarding Making Up for the Diluted Immediate Returns

       

      

      Given that ACM Research (Shanghai), Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “issuer”) intends to apply for an initial public offering and be listed on the Science
        and Technology Board, the enterprise, as the controlling shareholder of the issuer, now in accordance with the relevant laws, administrative regulations and relevant regulations of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, makes the following
        commitment with respect to the matters on making up for the diluted immediate returns:

       

      

      The enterprise will urge the issuer to effectively implement the measures to make up for the diluted immediate returns, and promise that the directors of the
        company or nominated by the company will participate in the issuer's operation and management activities within the scope of its authority, and do its utmost to protect the legitimate interests of the issuer and its shareholders.

      

      

      (There is no text below on this page)

       

      

      
        
          


      

      (There is no text on this page, it is the signature page of Commitment Letter Regarding Making Up for the Diluted Immediate Returns)

      

      

      	 	
              ACM RESEARCH, INC.

            
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
              Signature: /s/ Hui Wang

            
	 	 
	 	
              Name: HUI WANG

            
	 	 
	 	
              Title: Authorized representative

            
	 	 
	 	

            
	 	
              Date: May 21, 2020
#### § 1615.1 Purpose.

This part prohibits the provision of legal assistance in an action in the nature of habeas corpus seeking to collaterally attack a criminal conviction.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Anthony J.Armini, President and Chief Executive Officer of Implant Sciences Corporation,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofImplant Sciences Corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a.     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b.     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c.     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a.     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified forthe registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b.     any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls.

 

 
|   | Date:  February 12, 2004     |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Anthony J.  Armini                 |   |
|   |                                   |
|   | Anthony J. Armini                      |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
§ 2555.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 2555.500 through 2555.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.