alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State *vs.*John Cruickshank.

October Term, 1898.

Present: Ross, C. J., Taft, Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start and Thompson, JJ.

Opinion filed January 26, 1899.

*Judicial Notice.*— A complaint upon a city ordinance must set it forth, as-it is not within the judicial notice of the court.

*Conclusion of Complaint on Ordinance.*— Such a complaint properly concludes against the form of the statute, and perhaps should conclude against the form of the ordinance.

Complaint to the city court for the city of Barre by the city attorney. Heard in that court on demurrer to the complaint August 6, 1898. Demurrer overruled. The respondent excepted.

*Richard A. Hoar*for the respondent,

cited Bishop on Statutory Crime, (2d ed.) §§ 404-408; *State*v. *Soragan,*40' Yt. 450; *Keeler*v. Milledge, 4 Zab. 142; 1 Archibald, Crim. P. &. P. 248; Wharton, Crim. P. & P. 9th ed., §§ 224, 225; *Shanfelter*v. *Baltimore,*80 Md. 483; *Green*v. *Indianapolis,*22 Ind. 192; *Harker*v. *Mayor of N. Y,*17 Wend. 199; *Porter*v. *Waring,*69 N. Y. 250; 1 Dillon Mun. Corp. §§ 83, 414, 415.

*G. T. Swasey*and *John W. Gordon*for the State.

Although courts of general jurisdiction do not notice municipal ordinance's, a city court will recognize them *95because it bears the same relation to them which a state court bears to the laws of the State. *State*v. *Leiber,*11 la. 407; *Laporte*v. *Goodfellow,*47 la. 572; 1 Dill. Mun. Corp. (4th ed.) § 413; *City of Salomon*v. *Hughes,*24 Kans. 211; *Lanfear*v. *Mestier,*89 Am. Dec. 658 and note; Acts 1894, No. 165, § 77.

Rowell, J.

This complaint lacks substance. It alleges that the respondent did ride a bicycle along and upon the sidewalk on a certain street in the city of Barre, “in violation of sections twenty-five and thirty-six of chapter thirteen of the ordinances of said city,” *contra formam stattih.*It should have set out the ordinances, as the court cannot take judicial notice of them. *State*v. *Soragan,*40 Vt. 450.

It properly concluded against the form of the statute. *State*v. *Soragan.*Perhaps it should also have concluded against the form of the ordinances.

*Judgment reversed, demurrer sustained, complaint adjudged insufficient, and cause remanded.*
3rdResponseSubmittaltotheEPAEnclosure4Error# ErrorDescription Correction Originator Responsibility StatusDateofCompletion1 EPA Comment 1-23-13 Missing Reference.Appendix SOTERM, Figure SOTERM-7 caption citesAltmaier (2011) but this reference is missing from thereference list. Please provide this reference.This is a typographical error in AppendixSOTERM. The text will be corrected toread “Altmaier et al., 2008” which isalready included as a reference in AppendixSOTERM, given below. The requestedreference is included in Enclosure 2. FigureSOTERM-7 is based on Figure 5 in thisreference and shows the highest threeCaCl2 concentrations shown in thepublished Figure.This typographical error has been added toEnclosure 4, CRA-2014 Errata Tracking.Reference:Altmaier M., Neck, V., Fanghänel, T.,“Solubility of Zr(IV), Th(IV) and Pu(IV)hydrous oxides in CaCl2 solutions and theformation of ternary Ca-M-OH complexes,”Radiochimica Acta 96, (2008).EPA LANL-D. Reed Included in firstresponse submittalto EPASubmitted to EPAin first response,1/28/152 EPA Comment1-G-1 Reference Appendix QAPD-2014Not Provided.CRA-2014 Section 23, Models and Computer Codes,Section 23.5.7 states, "The DOE's quality assuranceprogram, as applied to the CRA-2014, is contained inAppendix QAPD-2014." The appendix has not beenprovided. Please provide this document.There was not an Appendix QAPD-2014 inthe CRA-2014; therefore, the statementabove is a typographical error in CRA-2014Section 23.5.7. The reference to QualityAssurance Program Document (QAPD) willbe added to Section 23 References and thetext will be corrected to read, “The DOE'squality assurance program, as applied to theCRA-2014, is contained in the QualityAssurance Program Document (U.S. DOE2010)." The QAPD is already included as areference in the CRA-2014; however, acopy of the QAPD is included in Enclosure2.This typographical error has been added toEnclosure 4, CRA-2014 Errata Tracking.EPA SNL-G. Safley Included in firstresponse submittalto EPASubmitted to EPAin first response,1/28/153 2-55-1 Incorrect Reference.IGP-2014, Section IGP-2.1 makes reference to194.55(b)(1), should this be 194.54(b)(1) “Existingboreholes...”?This is a typographical error in AppendixIGP-2014. The text will be corrected toread “Existing boreholes, as required by 40CFR § 194.54(b)(1)...”.This typographical error has been added toEnclosure 4, CRA-2014 Errata Tracking.EPA SNL-S. Wagner Included in thirdresponse submittalto EPASubmitted to EPAin third response,TBDCRA‐2014ErrataTrackingEnd of CRA-2014 Errata Tracking1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Each of the undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Conexant Systems, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 9, 2005 /s/ Dwight W. DeckerDwight W. DeckerChairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ J. Scott BlouinJ. Scott BlouinSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
I 

★

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1610 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to limit the 

annual percentage rate of interest that may be charged by recipients 

of financial assistance under such Act with respect to consumer credit 

card accounts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2009 

Ms. SPEIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

2008 to limit the annual percentage rate of interest 

that may be charged by recipients of financial assistance 

under such Act with respect to consumer credit card 

accounts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interest Rate Equity 

5 Act’’ or the ‘‘IRE Act’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1610 IH1S 

1 SEC. 2. CEILING ON CONSUMER CREDIT CARD INTEREST 

2 RATES IMPOSED BY TARP RECIPIENTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 113 of the Emergency 

4 Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5223) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(e) CEILING ON CONSUMER CREDIT CARD

8 RATES.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any financial 

10 institution which receives financial assistance under 

11 this title and extends credit to any consumer 

12 through a credit card account under an open end 

13 consumer credit plan, the annual percentage rate ap14 plicable to any outstanding balance on any such ac15 count while any such assistance is outstanding may 

16 not exceed 18 percent. 

17 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub18 section, the terms ‘consumer’, ‘credit’, ‘credit card’, 

19 and ‘open end credit plan’ have the same meanings 

20 as in section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act and 

21 the term ‘annual percentage rate’ means the annual 

22 percentage as determined in accordance with section 

23 107 of such Act.’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

25 subsection (a) shall apply to any finance charge imposed 

26 after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1610 IH1S 

1 of the enactment of this Act on any amount outstanding 

2 after the end of such period under a credit card account 

3 under an open end consumer credit plan. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
§ 261.55 Under what circumstances will we reduce the amount of the penalty for not properly imposing penalties on individuals? ( a ) We will reduce the amount of the penalty based on the degree of the State's noncompliance.
( b ) In determining the size of any reduction, we will consider objective evidence of: ( 1 ) Whether the State has established a control mechanism to ensure that the grants of individuals are appropriately reduced for refusing to engage in required work; and
( 2 ) The percentage of cases for which the grants have not been appropriately reduced.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76964-76965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on January 17, 2007 at The Creekside Room, Lake Tahoe Community 
College, One College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Committee, 
established by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 
2876), is chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing 
the terms of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe 
Region and other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 17, 2007, beginning at 9 a.m. 
and ending at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Creekside Room, Lake Tahoe 
Community College, One College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 
96150. (530) 543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda include: 
(1) The Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committee Communications Plan; (2) 
the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act Round 8; and (3) Public 
Comment. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are 
open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend at the 
above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee 
during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing 
written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after 
the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit at the contact address stated above.


[[Page 76965]]


    Dated: December 15, 2006.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9819 Filed 12-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  8,761
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          56,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                           175,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      239,886
<PP&E>                                                107,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                          4,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        342,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  92,990
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               16,837
<OTHER-SE>                                            232,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          342,824
<SALES>                                                20,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       21,078
<CGS>                                                  17,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          17,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    2,044,560
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2,040,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,040,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,040,645)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.13)



</TABLE>
Re: DFAR for the 2012 Democratic National Convention Committee 

Kenneth Hardy 

to: 

creminsky 

01/30/2015 10:34 AM 

Cc: 

Judycorley, mfavin 

Hide Details 

From: Kenneth Hardy <kenneth.hardy@gmail.com> 

To: creminsky@fec.gov, 

Cc: Judycorley <judycorley@gmail.com>, mfavin@fec.gov 

Ms. Reminsky, 

We have no further response. Please proceed. 

KDH 

On Wed, Jan 28,2015 at 4:38 PM, <creminskv@fec.gov> wrote: 

Good afternoon -

Attached please find the DFAR for the 2012 Democratic National Convention Committee. 

The Committee has until February 16, 2015 to respond to the DFAR, but if the Committee 

decides to respond sooner and lets me know that there will be no further response, I will 

start immediately on processing the Audit Recommendation Memorandum to the 

Commission. 

Judy, in the interest of mailing the report out now, I did not hold the report for your response, 

and no paper copy has been sent to you. If you would like a paper copy, please send me 

your address and I will have it mailed to you. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Thanks, 

Camilla Reminsky, CPA 

Auditor, Federal Election Commission 

202-694-1160 

file:///C:/Users/creminsky/AppData/Local/Temp/notesFCBCEE/~web3619.htm 1 /30/2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Union Street Acquisition Corp., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/ A. Clayton Perfall 
|                      |  | A. Clayton Perfall     
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Brian H. Burke     
|                      |  | Brian H. Burke         
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute, Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 13, 2007, 8:00 a.m. 
to February 15, 2007, 5 p.m., Hyatt Regency bethesda, One Bethesda 
Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was 
published in the Federal Register on November 30, 2006, 71 FR 69211.
    The meeting notice is changed to reflect the name of the committee 
from ``SPORE II'' to ``SPORE in Prostate, Breast and Skin Cancer.'' The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: December 20, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9888 Filed 12-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0996 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-068-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### Waterman A. Taft, as Receiver of the Export Lumber Company, Limited, Respondent, *v.*The South Brooklyn Sawmill Company, Limited, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

*Taft*v. *South Brooklyn Sawmill Go.,*123 App. Div. 925, affirmed.

(Argued June 14, 1909;

decided October 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 6, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for an accounting under certain business agreements.

*509
      *Solomon Ilanford*and *Joseph If. Allen*for appellants.

*O. V. Anadie, Archibald R. Watson*and *Raymond D. Thurber*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur; Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoook, JJ. Absent: Chase, J. _
Due to use of Java, Teleport Pro was unable to properly recreate the web site for the National Pollution Funds Center User Reference Guide. The entirety of the guide has been harvested and is found in: ~\netsite-docs\gpo14198\gpo14198\www.uscg.mil\npfc\docs\PDFs\urg.
#### Patrick M. Carolan, Individually and as Executor of Neal O'Donnell, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*John J. O'Donnell et al., Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Andrew O'Donnell et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

*Carolan*v. *O’Donnell,*128 App. Div. 924, reversed.

(Argued January 19, 1910;

decided February 8, 1910.

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 12, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to determine the validity of a written instrument propounded as the will of Neal O’Donnell, deceased.

*James W. Osborne*and *Edwin W. Willcox*for appellants.

*Morgan J. O'Brian, Joseph H. Fargis*and *James L. Clare*for respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that there was a question of fact as to the mental capacity of the testator which should have been submitted to the jury ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.