alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1544 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1544

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited 
eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat 
         service during certain periods of hostilities and war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2009

Mr. Driehaus (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, and Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited 
eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat 
         service during certain periods of hostilities and war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Mental Health Accessibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UNLIMITED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR MENTAL ILLNESSES FOR 
              VETERANS OF COMBAT SERVICE DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF 
              HOSTILITIES AND WAR.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 1710(e)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(F) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a veteran who served 
on active duty in a theater of combat operations (as determined by the 
Secretary in consultation with the Secretary of Defense) during World 
War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam Era, the Persian Gulf War, 
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or any other 
period of war after the Persian Gulf War, or in combat against a 
hostile force during a period of hostilities (as defined in section 
1712A(a)(2)(B) of this title), is eligible for hospital care, medical 
services, and nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 
mental illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient medical 
evidence to conclude that such illness is attributable to such 
service.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (F) of section 1710(e)(1) of 
title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
with respect to hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care 
provided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 33.2**MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE**Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsiblefor assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation ABpromulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122 (d) of Regulation AB areapplicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:Platform: Publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initially requiredunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backedsecurities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for whichthe Company provides the following servicing functions (the “Platform”): trustee and payingagent services.Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), tothe extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activitiesperformed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for thefollowing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), whichmanagement has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs withrespect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the “Period”).With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides thefollowing assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria: **•** The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance withthe Applicable Servicing Criteria.  **•** The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by theSecurities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  **•** Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, withthe Applicable Servicing Criteria.KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect tomanagement’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for thePeriod.      **CITIBANK, N.A.**
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John A. HAMILTON, Jr., Appellant.

No. 03-3400.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2004.

Decided: June 3, 2004.

Nancy A. Svoboda, Thomas J. Kangior, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James E. Mitchell, Omaha, NE, John A. Hamilton, Jr., Carter Lake, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*82PER CURIAM.

John A. Hamilton, Jr., pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1); knowingly possessing a firearm in relation to drug trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and a related forfeiture charge. The district court1 sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of 202 months and 60 months, plus 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Hamilton’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

We conclude the issues raised by counsel are unreviewable. Mr. Hamilton was sentenced within the applicable statutory range and at the bottom of the Guidelines range applied to him as a career offender, *cf. United States v. Woodrum,*959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (where defendant did not argue sentence was imposed in violation of law or as result of incorrect application of Guideline, sentence within properly calculated Guidelines range was not reviewable); and the district court explicitly recognized its authority to depart from the Guidelines when it decided not to grant Mr. Hamilton’s downward-departure motion, *see United States v. Koons,*300 F.3d 985, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2002) (where district court recognized authority to depart but elected not to do so under circumstances, decision is unreviewable).

Finally, we have carefully reviewed the record independently pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accredo Health, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David D. Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ David D. Stevens


David D. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2003



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Accredo Health, Incorporated and will be retained by Accredo
Health, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accredo Health, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David D. Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ David D. Stevens


David D. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2003
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Desenvolvimento de base:revista da Funda��o Interamericana.**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.IN 8/25:1/

Item Number:1051-D-01
CGP systemNumber:000410883
 
2007| 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
 
September 16, 2020
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION JUL 30 fl^ 8: k9 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

July 27,2012 

MEMORANDUM 

To: The Commission 

Through: Alec Palmer 

Staff Director 

From: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister — ^ 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Marty Kuest 

Audit Manager 

By: Philomena Brooks^^5 

Lead Auditor 

Subject: Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Djou for Hawaii (DFH) 

(All-08) 

Pursuant to Commission Directive No. 70 (FEC Directive on Processing Audit Reports), 

the Audit staffs recommendations are presented below and the findings are discussed in 

the attached Draft Final Audit Report (DFAR). The Office of General Counsel has 

reviewed this memorandum and concurs with the recommendation. 

Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity 

DFH's response to the DFAR did not address this finding. The Audit staff 

recommends that the Commission find that DFH misstated cash-on-hand for 

December 31,2010. 

Finding 2. Failure to File 48 Hour Notices 

DFH's response to the DFAR did not address this finding. The Audit staff 

recommends that the Commission find that DFH failed to file 48-hour notices for 

28 contributions totaling $50,700. 
Finding 3. Reporting of Debts and Obligations 

In its response to the DFAR, DFH questioned the sample projection for unreported 

debt totaling $168,900 as being greater than the actual amount identified by the 

audit. DFH stated that debts and obligations totaling $124,318 that were included 

on its amended reports filed in response to the interim audit report represent 

DFH's unreported debt. DFH requested that the finding total be revised to the 

lower amount. The Audit staff agrees with DFH and will correct the audit report 

to reflect that audit identified unreported debts of $124,318. The Audit staff 

recommends that the Commission find that DFH failed to report debts and 

obligations totaling $124,318. 

The Committee did not request an audit hearing. 

If this memorandum is approved, a Proposed Final Audit Report will be prepared within 

30 days of the Commission's vote. 

Should an objection be received. Directive No. 70 states that the Audit Division 

Recommendation Memorandum will be placed on the next regularly scheduled open 

session agenda. 

Documents related to this audit report can be viewed in the Voting Ballot Matters folder. 

Should you have any questions, please contact Philomena Brooks or Marty Kuest at 694-

1200. 

Attachment: 

- Draft Final Audit Report on DFH 

cc: Office of General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of ATEL  Financial  Services,  LLC,
Managing  Member of ATEL  Capital  Equipment  Fund  VIII,  LLC (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:        5/11/2004



/s/ Dean L. Cash
--------------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of Managing Member


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Irene H. Oh, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:           November 8, 2010








/s/ IRENE H. OH


Irene H. Oh


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer
• FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

\'VASHINCTON, 0 C 20463

A83-ll6

•

FINAL REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

1982 VICTORY FUND

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of the 1982 Victory Fund (lithe Committee"), undertaken by the Audit Division of the . Federal Election Commission in accordance with the Commission's

audit policy to determine whether there has been compliance with

the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as

amended ("the Act"). The audit was conducted pursuant to Section

438(b) of Title 2 of the United States Code which states, in

part, that the Commission may conduct audits and field

investigations of any political committee required to file under

section 434 of this title. Prior to conducting any audit under

this subsection, the Commission shall perform an internal review

of reports filed by selected committees to determine if the

reports filed by a particular committee meet the threshold

requirements for substantial compliance with the Act.

The Committee registered with toe Federal Election

Commission on July 28, 1980.1/ . The Co~~ittee maintains its

headquarters in New York City, New York. The audit covered the

period January 1, 1981 through December 31, 1982. The Committee

reported a cash balance on January 1, 1981 of $1,839.68; total

receipts of $57,365.05; total disbursements of $59,155.50, and a

cash balance on December 2, 1982 1/ of $49.23.

This audit report is based on documents and work papers

which support each of its factual statements. They form part of

the record upon which the Commission based its decisions on the

matters in this report and were available to the Commissioners

and appropriate staff for review.

1/ The Committee registered as the 1980 Victory Fund, the

Committee changed its name to the 1982 Victory Fund on June

14, 1982.

The closing date of the latest report filed. The Committee

filed an amendment correcting the report coverage date to

December 31, 1982.
--

•

-2-

B. Key Personnel

The Treasurer of the Committee during the audit period

was James E. O'Doherty.

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts and disbursements and individual transactions;

review of required supporting documentation1 analysis of debts

and obligations and such other audit procedures as deemed

necessary under the circumstances.

II. Audit Finding and Recommendation

A. Matter Referred to the Office of General Counsel

A certain matter noted during the audit was referred to

the Commission's .Office of General Counsel on March 28, .1984 •
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the 2012 Democratic 

National Convention Committee, Inc. 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on March 09,201S, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on the 2012 Democratic National Convention Committee, Inc., as 

recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and 

Audit Division dated February 6,201S. 

Coimnissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

TKMMJJIJOIS 

Date I. Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
§ 235.50 State plan requirements for methods of personnel administration. ( a ) A State plan for financial assistance programs under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Social Security Act must provide that methods of personnel administration will be established and maintained in public agencies administering or supervising the administration of the program in conformity with the Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration, 5 CFR part 900, subpart F, which incorporates the Intergovernmental Personnel Act Merit Principles (Pub. L. 91-648, section 2, 84 Stat. 1909), prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management pursuant to section 208 of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 as amended.
[45 FR 25398, Apr. 15, 1980]
#### Edward J. Dunphy, as Executor of Katharine D. Callahan, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Cornelius Callahan, Respondent.

*Dunphy*v. *Callahan,*126 App. Div. 11, 956. affirmed.

(Submitted February 8, 1909;

decided February 23, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 11, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate or modify a judgment charging the plaintiff personally with the costs of an action brought by him as executor to recover personal property which he claimed belonged to the estate of his decedent.

The following question was certified: “Was the clerk authorized to enter judgment for costs against the plaintiff personally upon the verdict of a jury for the defendant, where the action is brought by the plaintiff as executor of the decedent to recover personal property which the executor claimed belonged to the estate ? ”

*James Z. Pearsall*for appellant.

*John V. Judge*and *John T. Fenlon*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative on prevailing opinion below.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
#### § 2523.90 Is there a matching requirement for Federal agencies?

No. A Federal agency is not required to match funds in programs that receive support under this chapter. However, Federal agency subgrantees are required to match funds in accordance with the requirements of § 2521.30(g) and § 2522.240(b)(6) of this chapter.

[59 FR 13804, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 53760, Sept. 17, 2008]
EX-35 (a)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007


RE: ACE 2006-ASAP4


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.


1.      A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
        and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
        as of July 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my
        supervision.

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all
        of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
        throughout the Reporting Period.


By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name: Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGE NCY WASH I NGTO N , D . C . 20460

Kathleen M . Roberts Executive Director 

## DEC -2 2014

Biobased and Renewable Products Advocacy Group 2200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 1 OOW Washington , DC 20037 Dear Ms . Roberts: OFFIC E OF CHEMICAL SAFETY A N D PO L L UTIO N PREVE N TIO N

I am writing to confirm that on October 21, 2014 , the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received your petition requesting that the EPA " initiate a rulemaking to amend the [Toxic Substances Control Act] Section 8 Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) partially exempted chemical list set forth in the [EPA' s] regulations at 40 C.F.R. Section 711.6(b){l) , " pursuant to Section 21 ofTSCA. Section 21 ofTSCA provides that the Administrator shall either grant or deny a petition within 90 days after the date of filing (January 19, 2015 , for your petition) . Section 21 further provides that, ifthe Administrator grants the petition, the Administrator shall promptly commence an appropriate proceeding and that, ifthe Administrator denies the petition, the Administrator shall publish the reasons for such a denial in the Federal Register . On October 22, 2014 , the EPA also received your petition to amend the CDR partially exempted chemical list at 40 C .F .R. Section 711.6(b) {2)(iv) . Both your petitions are under review by the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) , which is responsible for programs under TSCA. Ifyou have ques tions relating to these petitions, please cont act Loraine Passe by telephone at (202) 564-9064 or by email at passe.loraine@epa.gov. Sincerely,



# w~c.<tl.._~ Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director Office ofPollution Prevention and T oxics

I n terne t Add ress (URL) • http.//www. epa . gov Recyc led/ Recyc l abl e • Pnnted w 1 th Vege tab l e Oi l Based I nks on 1 00% Postconsumer. Process Ch l orine Free Recycled Paper