alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-228 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ATOMIC ENERGY 

Research and Development 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Washington February 28, 2005 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Atomic Energy: Research and Development 

 Agreement signed at Washington February 28, 2005; 

 Entered into force February 28, 2005. 






NOTE: Only English language will be printed in this publication.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc.
      (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30,
      2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By:
      /s/LYNNE HOHLFELD


Lynne
      Hohlfeld


Chief
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer








Date:
      November 29, 2007
#### § 150.207 Procedure for determining that a State fails to substantially enforce PHS Act requirements.

Sections 150.209 through 150.219 describe the procedures CMS follows to determine whether a State is substantially enforcing PHS Act requirements.

[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed advisory committee meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on National Guard and Reserves in the GWOT will meet in closed session on January 3-4, 2006; at the Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess the consequences for force structure, morale, and mission capability of deployments of members of the National Guard and the Reserves in the course of the global war on terrorism that are lengthy, frequent, or both.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly the meetings will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e-mail at                         *clifton.phillips@osd.mil,*                         or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

Dated: December 5, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-9616 Filed 12-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1837 Prepped by Keeia Richards



## Document

Number: 

# 175 ) IV-E-9 Docket Number: 

# A-84-3 3

Printed 11/14/2008 3:48:11 PM Sheet 175of 238.*-«"""* . * P. 2 

# r>^K-3 1
UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y

WASHINGTON

, D.C . 20460 Augus t 4 , 198 7 OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Conversation s wit hRepresentative s fro m AM C an d N C A o nPropose dNS RSurfac e Coa l Min e Rulemakin g Ne w Docke t Entry : Docke t No . A-84-3 3 FRO M 

### T O Barbar a Brow n

Offic e o f Ai r an dRadiatio n Centra l Docke t Sectio n(LE-131 ) O nJun e 30 , 1987 , I ha da brie f discussio nwit hLarr y Boggs , America nMinin g Congress , regardin g th e subjec t rulemaking . I advise dhi m

tha t EP A

i s continuin g it s interna l deliberation s o n t h e issue . O nJul y 6 , I ha da simila r conversatio nwit h J o e Mullan , Nationa l Coa l Association . c c : Kir t Cox , Projec t Office r
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 50 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 50

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
   Exchange Commission relating to ``Cybersecurity Risk Management, 
            Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2023

Mr. Tillis (for himself and Mrs. Britt) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
   Exchange Commission relating to ``Cybersecurity Risk Management, 
            Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 
``Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident 
Disclosure'' (88 Fed. Reg. 51896 (August 4, 2023)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
§ 16.16 Parties to the appeal. ( a ) The only parties to the appeal are the appellant and the respondent. If the Board determines that a third person is a real party in interest (for example, where the major impact of an audit disallowance would be on the grantee's contractor, not on the grantee), the Board may allow the third person to present the case on appeal for the appellant or to appear with a party in the case, after consultation with the parties and if the appellant does not object.
( b ) The Board may also allow other participation, in the manner and by the deadlines established by the Board, where the Board decides that the intervenor has a clearly identifiable and substantial interest in the outcome of the dispute, that participation would sharpen issues or otherwise be helpful in resolution of the dispute, and that participation would not result in substantial delay.
A. RISTOXL K 

Now You KNOW"^*^ 

205 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20003 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: Washington State Republican Committee Response to Interim Audit Report 

Dear Mr. Hintermister: 

In response to the recommendations in the interim audit report (IAR) for the Washington 

State Republican Party, WSRP has filed amended reports for 2009 and 2010 to correct 

misstatements of financial activity. Levin fimds, and debts and obligations. WSRP previously 

filed amended 2011 reports to adjust its cash on hand balance to correspond to the audit findings. 

WSRP wishes to raise one additional issue for consideration in preparation of the draft 

final audit report. The IAR concluded WSRP failed to report a $43,920.85 disbursement from its 

Federal account on August 5, 2010 and that WSRP failed to report a transfer of an identical 

amount from its non-Federal to its Federal account on August 12,2010. This payment was for 

state legislative campaign activity (100% non-Federal). The payment was mistakenly made from 

the Federal account and the error was discovered and rectified in one week. While WSRP 

amended its reports to disclose these transactions, WSRP does not believe these transactions 

should be included in the finding regarding misstatement of financial activity. 

A combination of Federal and Washington law effectively require WSRP to maintain 

four separate accounts (Federal, Levin, State Exempt, and State Non-Exempt). Occasionally, 

especially in the midst of a busy election season, a payment is made or a receipt deposited into 

an incorrect account. On the receipt side, WSRP performs a daily reconciliation that normally 

resolves receipt characterizations at the end of each business day. Disbursements are reviewed 

weekly at a minimum. 
In light of this regulatory complexity, WSRP believes there should be room to correct 

clerical errors in deposit or payment processing. The Audit Division's finding currently counts 

this error against WSRP twice: first as an unreported disbursement, and second as an unreported 

receipt (transfer) from the state account. While tiiis accounting presents a technically correct 

picture of WSRP's bank account activity, it presents a substantively misleading picture of 

WSRP's Federal and non-Federal activity. WSRP believes these transactions should be 

excluded from the finding regarding misstatement of financial activity. 

Sincerely, 

David M. Mason 

Senior Vice President, Compliance Services
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In tfae Matter of ) 

) A09-08 

Miimesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor ) Agenda Documents No. 12-81 and No. 

Party ) 12-81-A 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Sfaawn Woodfaead Wertfa, recording secretary for tfae Federal Election Comniission 

open meeting on December 06,2012, do faereby certify that the Cominission decided by a vote of 

6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor 

Party (A09-08) as set forth in Agenda Document No. 12-81-A. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGafan n, Petersen, Walther and Weintraub voted 

afiirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date Sfaawn Woodfaead Wertfa 

Secretary and Clerk of the CPommission
# Human Rights Day, Bill of Rights Day, and Human Rights Week, 2006

Peace and justice prevail when people are free to speak, assemble, and worship, when their rights are protected, and when governments are accountable to their citizens. These blessings of freedom are guaranteed for Americans in the Bill of Rights of our Constitution. During Human Rights Day, Bill of Rights Day, and Human Rights Week, we celebrate the ideals of our founders and reaffirm the belief that freedom is the gift of God and the right of all mankind.

Just over six decades ago, the future of freedom seemed bleak, with only a small number of democracies around the world. Today, citizens of over 100 nations enjoy the blessings of democracy, and freedom is taking root in places where liberty had been unimaginable. The United States will continue to support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation.

The advance of freedom is the story of our time, and new chapters are being written before our eyes. Around the world, freedom is replacing tyranny and giving men and women the opportunity to enjoy lives of purpose and dignity. Because Americans are committed to the God-given value of every life, we cherish the freedom of every person in every nation and strive to promote respect for human rights. By standing with those who desire liberty, we will help extend freedom to many who have not known it and lay the foundations of peace for generations to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 10, 2006, as Human Rights Day; December 15, 2006, as Bill of Rights Day; and the week beginning December 10, 2006, as Human Rights Week. I call upon the people of the United States to mark these observances with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

[FR Doc. 06-9732

Billing code 3195-01-P
* Pursuant to 5th C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40812 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS HERNANDEZ-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-103-1

April 13, 1999

Before JOHNSON, DUHE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Hernandez-Perez (“Hernandez”) appeals his sentence imposed

by the district court pursuant to his guilty plea conviction for

entering the United States without the Attorney General’s consent after

previously having been convicted and deported. Hernandez contends that

the cour t’s imposition of a sixteen level increase to his base offense

level under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) of the Sentencing Guidelines was based on

an unconstitutionally vague definition of “aggravated felony.”

Although Hernandez made a written objection to the probation

officer’s recommendation for the sixteen level increase, he withdrew his2

objection at the sentencing hearing. The withdrawl of an objection

constitutes the waiver of that ob jection by the defendant. S ee United

States v. Musquiz
, 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995). Because “waived

errors are entirely unreviewable,” Hernandez has effectively eliminated

his only claim on appeal. Id.

Even if Hernandez had not waived his claim of unconstitutional

vagueness, however, we would review it only for plain error as he did

not raise the issue at his sentencing hearing. S ee United States v.
Spires
, 79 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 1996). Under this standard, we

are not able to conclude that Hernandez has shown that a clear or

obvious error affected his substantial rights. S ee United States v.
Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-63 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                302 CERTIFICATION

I, Alan G. Silverglat, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Pulitzer Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2003

/s/ Alan G. Silverglat
-----------------------------
Alan G. Silverglat
Senior Vice President-Finance
Editorial Note on Part 1303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

§ 1303.75 Children with disabilities. ( a ) A program must ensure there are school buses or allowable alternate vehicles adapted or designed for transportation of children with disabilities available as necessary to transport such children enrolled in the program. This requirement does not apply to the transportation of children receiving home-based services unless school buses or allowable alternate vehicles are used to transport the other children served under the home-based option by the grant recipient. Whenever possible, children with disabilities must be transported in the same vehicles used to transport other children enrolled in the Head Start program.
( b ) A program must ensure special transportation requirements in a child's IEP or IFSP are followed, including special pick-up and drop-off requirements, seating requirements, equipment needs, any assistance that may be required, and any necessary training for bus drivers and monitors.
[81 FR 61412, Sept. 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024]
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND 

COMMUNITY SERVICE 

26 111 Edward L. Flippen, of Virginia, to be Inspector 

General, Corporation for National and 

Community Services, vice J. Russell George. 

Mar 09, 2005 Senate Committee 

on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

discharged. Pursuant to 

unanimous consent agreement 

of January 20, 2005. 

 Feb 10, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Enzi, Committee on Health, 

Education, Labor, and 

Pensions, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 30 185 John B. Bellinger, of Virginia, to be Legal Adviser 

of the Department of State, vice William 

Howard Taft, IV. 

Mar 15, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Lugar, Committee on Foreign 

Relations, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 35 227 Patricia Lynn Scarlett, of California, to be 

Deputy Secretary of the Interior, vice J. Steven 

Griles, resigned. 

Mar 16, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Domenici, Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

THE JUDICIARY 

37 199 William Gerry Myers III, of Idaho, to be United 

States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice 

Thomas G. Nelson, retired. 

Mar 17, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Specter, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

38 211 Paul A. Crotty, of New York, to be United States 

District Judge for the Southern District of New 

York, vice Harold Baer, Jr., retired. 

Mar 17, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Specter, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

39 204 J. Michael Seabright, of Hawaii, to be United 

States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, 

vice Alan C. Kay, retired. 

Mar 17, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Specter, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

4

DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND 

REALIGNMENT COMMISSION 

* 40 283 Anthony Joseph Principi, of California, to be a 

Member of the Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment Commission. (New Position) 

Mar 17, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Warner, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report.
#### § 2540.320 How are participant benefits treated?

Section 142(b) of the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1552(b)) shall apply to the programs conducted under this chapter as if such programs were conducted under the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1501 *et seq.*).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Francis G. Blinn, Appellant.

*People*v. *Blinn,*131 App. Div. 935, affirmed.

(Argued October 21, 1909;

decided November 9, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 23,1909, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General *555Sessions in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of attempted abortion.

*Henry TV. Unger*for appellant.

*William Trrners Jerome, District Attorney (Robert O. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook^ JJ.