alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




Solely
      for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief
      Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (the “Company”),
      hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 15, 2007
            /s/
                Daniel B. O’Brien
              Daniel
                B. O’Brien
              Chief
                Financial and Accounting Officer
ArizonaFPV LLC

4717 E. Gatewood Rd. Phoenix Arizona, 85050

February 11, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave.

, SE

Washington, DC 20590

REF: DOT/FAA Amendment to Current Exemption #12815 

### Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−2603

Dear Sir or Madam:

We at ArizonaFPV LLC are requesting an amendment to our existing granted exemption #12815.

ArizonaFPV LLC has the need to work with a growing number of popular lightweight (under 55lbs) UAV

platforms alongsid e our already currently approved platforms in our exemption.

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Matrice, DJI Spreading

Wings S800, DJI Spreading Wings S1000, 3D Robotics Solo, 3D Robotics Iris+, Parrot Bebop, Ze phyr

2, Walkera Runner 250, Walkera Voyager 3, Walkera Scout X4, Turbo Ace Matrix, Immersion RC

Vortex, and the Team Black Sheep Gemini.



### The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar (see Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2515).

ArizonaFPV LLC woul d like to have approval for operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations would apply.

1. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.

2. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must

submit a written Plan of Activit ies to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and t imes for all flights; b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used; e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming; f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request; g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county,

and/or state ove r which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

3. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specif ied in the exemption holder’s

MPTOM.

Respectfully,

Brian Deatherage

Chief Operations Officer

ArizonaFPV LLC

www.phoenixdronservice.com

brian@arizonafpv.com

Phone: 480

- 200

- 0371

4717 E. Gatewood Rd. Phoenix AZ., 85050
Si()-|()()4()7-023 

OFFIC E O F TH E MAYO R 

CIT Y O F laNGSPORT , TENNESSE E 

March 31,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-lBt 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver hi^ y competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having 

three competitive air alliances to choose from. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

lis Phillips 

Mayor 

City of Kingsport 

TrI-Cltles 

TN/VA 

1999 

Tri-Clties 

TN/VA 

AII>AinericaCity 

uiiir 

city Hall 225 West Center Street Kingsport, TN 37660-4237 (423) 229-94C30 

Kingsport — The Best Place To Be 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 1304

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1304 appear at 89 FR 67817, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1304.40 Purpose.

As provided in section 648A(d) of the Act, the Head Start Fellows Program is designed to enhance the ability of Head Start Fellows to make significant contributions to Head Start and to other child development and family services programs.
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

S. RES 

NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO

TREATY

DOC NO

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

THE JUDICIARY 

38 33 George H. Wu, of California, to be United States 

District Judge for the Central District of 

California, vice Ronald S. W. Lew, retired. 

Mar 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

43 6 Vanessa Lynne Bryant, of Connecticut, to be 

United States District Judge for the District of 

Connecticut, vice Dominic J. Squatrito, retired. 

Mar 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

ARMY 

44 212 The following named officer for appointment as 

the Chief of Engineers/Commanding General, 

United States Army Corps of Engineers, and 

appointment to the grade indicated in the 

United States Army, while assigned to a 

position of importance and responsibility under 

title 10, U.S.C., sections 601 and 3036: 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Lieutenant General 

 Lt. Gen. Robert L. Van Antwerp, Jr., 

NAVY 

45 215 The following named officer for appointment in 

the United States Navy to the grade indicated 

while assigned to a position of importance and 

responsibility under title 10, U.S.C., section 

601: 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Admiral 

 Adm. Timothy J. Keating, 

AIR FORCE 

46 290 The following named officer for appointment in 

the United States Air Force to the grade 

indicated while assigned to a position of 

importance and responsibility under title 10, 

U.S.C., section 601: 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be General 

 Lt. Gen. Victor E. Renuart, Jr., 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO

MESSAGE

NO

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

4

ARMY 

47 314 The following named officer for appointment to 

the grade of lieutenant general in the United 

States Army while assigned to a position of 

importance and responsibility under title 10, 

U.S.C., section 601: 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Lieutenant General 

 Lt. Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli, 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES 

* 48 241 W. Craig Vanderwagen, of Maryland, to be 

Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and 

Response, Department of Health and Human 

Services. (New Position) 

Mar 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Kennedy, Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions, without printed 

report.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Zubeda Mohamed-Lakhani, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Cartan Holdings Inc., for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cartan Holdings Inc.



Date:  June 26, 2007



/s/ Zubeda Mohamed-Lakhani

Zubeda Mohamed-Lakhani

Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|                       |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Hugh Moore, Respondent, *v.*Eugene J. Grant et al., Appellants.

*Moore*v. *Grant,*131 App. Div. 916, appeal dismissed.

(Argued October 4, 1909;

decided October 12, 1909.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 15, 1909,affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for services.

The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment of the Appellate Division was not appealable of right to the Court of Appeals, and permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*William E. O. Mayer*for motion.

*Leopholcl Leo*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars cost of motion.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Inside ICE**** 
SuDocNumber: HS 4.215:
ItemNumber: 0520-D-01 (online)
CGPsystem Number: 000594368
 - InsideICE_042604.pdfInsideICE_062104.pdfInsideICE_071904.pdfInsideICE_080204.pdfInsideICE_081604.pdfInsideICE_083004.pdfInsideICE_091304.pdfInsideICE_092704.pdfInsideICE_101204.pdfInsideICE_102504.pdfInsideICE_110804.pdfInsideICE_112204.pdfInsideICE_120604.pdfInsideICE_122004.pdfInsideICE_010405.pdfInsideICE_011805.pdfInsideICE_013105.pdfInsideICE_021405.pdfInsideICE_022805.pdfInsideICE_031405.pdfInsideICE_032805.pdfInsideICE_041105.pdfInsideICE_042805.pdfInsideICE_052305.pdfInsideICE_052405.pdfInsideICE_060305.pdfInsideICE_062005.pdfInsideICE_070405.pdfInsideICE_071905.pdfInsideICE_080305.pdfInsideICE_081505.pdfInsideICE_082905.pdfInsideICE_091905.pdfInsideICE_100305.pdfInsideICE_101705.pdfInsideICE_110105.pdfInsideICE_111405.pdfInsideICE_120505.pdfInsideICE_012206.pdfInsideICE_030806.pdfInsideICE_060806.pdfInsideICE_070406.pdfInsideICE_072506.pdfInsideICE_013007.pdfInsideICE_041107.pdfInsideICE_060107.pdf
 **
onct-ex104_122.htm



Exhibit 10.4

 

Amendment 4 to Collaboration Agreement

This Amendment 4 to the Collaboration Agreement (the “Amendment 4”) is effective as of December 15, 2019 (the “Amendment 4 Effective Date”) and amends that certain Collaboration Agreement between The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (“MD Anderson”) and Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., formerly Tokalas, Inc. (“Oncternal”) effective as of December 15, 2014 (the “Agreement”), as amended by Amendment 1 effective as of January 24, 2016 (the “Amendment 1”), by Amendment 2 effective as of May 1, 2016 (the “Amendment 2”), and by Amendment 3 effective as of September 17, 2018 (“Amendment 3”). Oncternal and MD Anderson are sometimes referred to collectively herein as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”

Background

A.The Agreement contemplates that MD Anderson and Oncternal will collaborate on certain research and clinical trials related to Oncternal’s proprietary drug, TK-216, as set forth in Exhibit A to the Agreement; and

B.The Parties have concluded that it is in the best interests of each of them to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

Accordingly, the Parties are entering into this Amendment 4 to set forth their agreement on amendments to the Agreement.

1.The Parties agree that the term of the Agreement, as set forth in Section 7 (Term and Termination), is hereby extended through December 15, 2020. 

2.Incorporation; Conflicts; Capitalized Terms. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Amendment 4 and the Agreement, Amendment 1, Amendment 2, Amendment 3 and this Amendment 4 shall prevail. Terms capitalized, but not defined, in this Amendment 3 or an Exhibit shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

3.No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment 4, and in Amendment 1, Amendment 2 and Amendment 3, there are no other modifications or amendments to the Agreement and the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

4.Effective and Binding. Upon execution by the Parties, this Amendment 3 shall be effective and binding as of the Amendment 4 Effective Date.

[Signatures on Following Page]

 

1



 



Exhibit 10.4

 

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:


		
	
Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.
	
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

	
By /s/ James B. Breitmeyer
	
By: /s/ Ben Melson

	
Name: James B. Breitmeyer
	
Name: Ben Melson

	
Title: President and CEO
	
Title: Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	
Date: February 19, 2020
	
Date: February 19, 2020




 

2
§ 1611.4 Financial eligibility for legal assistance. ( a ) A recipient may provide legal assistance supported with LSC funds only to individuals whom the recipient has determined to be financially eligible for such assistance. Nothing in this part, however, prohibits a recipient from providing legal assistance to an individual without regard to that individual's income and assets if the legal assistance is wholly supported by funds from a source other than LSC, and is otherwise permissible under applicable law and regulation.
( b ) Consistent with the recipient's financial eligibility policies and this part, the recipient may determine an applicant to be financially eligible for legal assistance if the applicant's assets do not exceed the recipient's applicable asset ceiling established pursuant to § 1611.3(d)(1), or the applicable asset ceiling has been waived pursuant § 1611.3(d)(2), and: ( 1 ) The applicant's income is at or below the recipient's applicable annual income ceiling; or
( 2 ) The applicant's income exceeds the recipient's applicable annual income ceiling but one or more of the authorized exceptions to the annual income ceilings, as provided in § 1611.5, applies.
( c ) Consistent with the recipient's policies, a recipient may determine an applicant to be financially eligible without making an independent determination of income or assets, if the applicant's income is derived solely from a governmental program for low-income individuals or families, provided that the recipient's governing body has determined that the income standards of the governmental program are at or below 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines amounts and that the governmental program has eligibility standards which include an assets test.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 

12, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00282-CV

GUY B. SULLAWAY, JR., Appellant

V.

CAROLYN JANICE SMITH, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1035630-002

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 1, 2014. On July 31, 2014, 

appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Kalaupapa EAS 

November 20,2013 

Shannon Abarra <abarras@hawaii.edu> 

Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:52 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Aloha Department of Transportation, 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and 

Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent 

flights, multiple islands and ease of booking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, 

Priceline etc.). It is important we have safe, stables & affordable service to Kalaupapa. Please select Mokulele 

to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. 

Shannon Abarra 

1
****EXHIBIT 32.1****

 

****IMPLANTSCIENCES CORPORATION****

 

****CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant SciencesCorporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony Armini, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | **/s/**    Anthony  Armini       |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony Armini                                       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |                                                 |
|   | February 22, 2005                                    |

 

----
§ 2552.24 What are a sponsor's responsibilities for securing community participation? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) A sponsor shall secure community participation in local project operation by establishing an Advisory Council or a similar organizational structure with a membership that includes people: ( 1 ) Knowledgeable of human and social needs of the community;
( 2 ) With an interest in the field of community service and volunteerism;
( 3 ) Capable of helping the sponsor satisfy its administrative and program responsibilities including fund-raising, publicity and meeting or exceeding performance measures;
( 4 ) With an interest in, and knowledge of, the range of abilities of older adults; and
( 5 ) Of a diverse composition that reflects the demographics of the service area.
( b ) The sponsor determines how such participation shall be secured consistent with the provisions of paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section.
[64 FR 14126, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64650, Dec. 17, 2018]
Case 1:22-cv-00369-CRC Document 3 Filed 04/08/22 Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO ) 

8 Park Place ) 

) 

Mansfield, TX 76063 ) 

Tel. (202) 594 – 4344 ) 

) Civil Action No. 1:22–cv–00369 (CRC) 

Plaintiff, ) Judge: Christopher R. Cooper 

) 

) 

VS. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ) 

1050 First Street, NE ) 

) 

Washington, DC 20463, ) 

Defendant. ) 

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 41(a)(2), Plaintiff, John Anthony Castro, hereby moves 

for the Voluntary Dismissal of the above-entitled action without prejudice against Defendant. 

Defendant does not oppose this Motion. 

APRIL 8, 2022 By:______ _________________ 

JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO 

12 Park Place 

Mansfield, TX 76063 

Tel. (202) 792- 6600 

J.Castro@CastroandCo.com 

Respectfully submitted 

PLAINTIFF PRO SE 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO VOL. DISMISS 

PAGE 1 OF 1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-00369-CRC Document 3 Filed 04/08/22 Page 2 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO ) 

8 Park Place ) 

) 

Mansfield, TX 76063 ) 

Tel. (202) 594 – 4344 ) 

) Civil Action No. 1:22–cv–00369 (CRC) 

Plaintiff, ) Judge: Christopher R. Cooper 

) 

) 

VS. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ) 

1050 First Street, NE ) 

) 

Washington, DC 20463, ) 

Defendant. ) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 41(a)(2), it is 

HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. 

SO ORDERED 

Date:__________ _________________________ 

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER 

United Stated District Judge
#### Ellington *v.*The State.

Submitted October 20,

Decided November 9, 1906.

Indictment for murder — conviction of voluntary manslaughter. Before Judge Lewis. Laurens superior court. September *12,*1906.

*W. O. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. P. Pottle, solicitor-general,*contra.

Beck, J.

The only error of law complained of being that the court erred in giving in charge to the jury the law of voluntary manslaughter, and it appearing that the facts and circumstances proved authorized the charge, and the vei'dict being sustained by the evidence, no cause for reversing the judgment refusing a new trial is shown.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*