alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Zhaohui John Liang, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA OUMEI REAL ESTATE INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.   The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of October, 2011.

/s/ Zhaohui John LiangZhaohui John Liang
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Oumei Real Estate Inc. and will be retained by China Oumei Real Estate Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### Anthony *v.*The State.

Submitted October 17,

Decided November 9, 1906.

Accusation of cheating and swindling. Before Judge Bush. City court of Miller county. August 13, 1906.

*W. I. Geer,*by *Z. D. Harrison,*for plaintiff in error.

*N. L. Stapleton, solicitor,*contra.

Evans, J.

1. As was expressly ruled in *Vinson*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*19, “A minor who has arrived at the age of criminal responsibility may be convicted, under the act of 1903, of the fraudulent practices made penal by that act, although a contract of service made by him may not be civilly enforceable.”

2. While proof that the minor left the service of his employer in obedience to parental authority will suffice to rebut all presumption of fraudulent intent *(Howard*v. *State,*ante, 538), yet the bare fact that the minor told his employer that he had yielded to the command of a stranger to go to work for him can afford the minor no excuse, in the absence of a satisfactory showing that he did so under fear or duress, rather than voluntarily and with the purpose of defrauding his employer in accordance with a previously formed intent.

3. The evidence in the present case was such as to authorize the conviction of the accused, even upon the assumption that he was a minor; which is not made to appear in the record otherwise than inferentially

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
RECORD OF CONVERSATION 

I CONTACT INFORMATION 

Date ofConversation: January 9, 2015 ----~~~-----------------------------------------

Company: Lone Star Flight Museum 

ContactName: _M __ re ryL_ ____________________________________ ___ 

Docket Number: F AA-2006-25434 

Phone: 0 

Email: 0 

Phone Number: 

Email Address: 

---------------------------------------------

CONVERSATION INFORMATION 

Subject: Need for more ELOS information on the topics below 

Details: 

Conclusion or Action Taken: 

NAME 

Thomas J. 

Leah 

OFFICE 

AFS-830 

Lone Star will provide needed information, Comments or 

revisions, of additional documents or clarifications in 30 days, 

February 9, 2015 

FAA EMPLOYEE INFORMATION 

Lone Star includes an SMS document in support of its commitment to ELOS, which it intends to 

implement if granted. 

Lone Star submitted an Operations Manual in support of ELOS, which it intends to implement if 

granted. 
This office proposes a teleconference or meeting to clarify the FAA position and discuss the 

following topics: 

~ Lone Star's SMS may be acceptable with minor modifications and when used in 

conjunction with a sufficient operations Manual. 

~ Lone Star's operations manual does not interface with the SMS Manual, nor does the 

SMS Manual support the operations manual. Neither document is sufficient as a standalone document. 

~ Lone Star's operations manual lacks operational control structure and the elements 

required to support an SMS program, and while pilot aircraft training and qualification is 

mentioned, no general subjects training or maintenance provider training is provided to 

the pilots or Maintenance group. 

~ Provide an operational control structure or chain of command within your operations 

manual for pilot's maintenance, and support personnel or supporting documents that 

these safeguards are ·in place. 

~ Please list the qualifications required to hold an operational control position. 

~ Please provide an outline or explanation of your proposed general subjects and 

maintenance training. 

Comments or submission of additional documents or clarifications addressing these concerns 

would be helpful in evaluating Lone Star's ELOS position. 

Absent requested information Lone Star will not meet an ELOS lAW CFR 14 Part II. 

Please provide the requested information within 30 days. 

2
Exhibit 31 I, Kelly Fielder, certify that: 1.As of December 31, 2006,I have reviewed the annual reportof Silver Bell Resources Inc.;2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Designed such control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;c)evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and5.I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 5, 2007Signed:"Kelly Fielder"Name:Kelly FielderTitle:President, CFO
# Rupprecht Law P. A.
28 11 Grande Parkway, Suite 113 | Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 P: (561) 222

- 6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com

October 8, 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140, Washington, DC 20590 Re: Petition for Amendment to Add Aircraft to Higher Perspective Cinema, Inc

. ’ s Exemption

. ( Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3712 ) Dear Sir or Madam: Higher Perspective Cinema, Inc. ( Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3712 ) was granted an exemption to conduct aerial d ata collection and closed set TV /movie filming using the DJI Inspire and a custom Cinestar 8

. There is no request for additional relief from any further regulations. Higher Perspective Cinema, Inc. requests for an amendment to th at exemption to add onto its fleet the Freefly Systems Alta

. Granting this exemption would not affect safety but will benefit the public because instead of dangerous helicopters being used, safer and quieter unmanned aircraft can b e used under the restric tions outlined in the previous ly granted exemption. Higher Perspective Cinema, Inc. agrees to operate under the same restrictions in the previously granted exemption. The petitioner will operate under the restrictions listed in the manufacturer ’ s manual.

 Freefly Systems Alta
o Alta Starter Guide http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp

content/uploads/2015/07/24212006/FFASG.pdf
o Alta User Manual http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp

content/uploads/2015/07/28175748/ALTA_Manual_RevB.pdf2

Higher Perspective Cinema, Inc. will operate only within the limitations in the previously grante d exemption and the limitations listed in the manuals. The limitations, from the previously granted exemption, will be followed if there is a conflict with the manuals.
Since the drone ha s been previous evaluated in other exemptions , Freefly Systems Alta ( Exemption No. 12362 ) , it w ill not set any precedent ; therefore, there is good cause to waive the publishing of this petition in the Federal Register.
Sincerely,

________________________ Jonathan B. Rupprecht, Esq.
This table was published on 4/3/15.

Committee ID Committee Name

Beginning 

Coverage Date

Ending 

Coverage Date

Public 

Distribution Date

Total 

Disbursements

Filing 

Received

C30001051 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY 7/11/2014 7/15/2014 7/15/2014 $414,315 7/16/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 4/29/2014 5/6/2014 4/29/2014 $15,450 7/2/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 $31,995 10/20/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/21/2014 10/27/2014 10/21/2014 $567,412 10/22/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/21/2014 10/27/2014 10/21/2014 $115,000 10/22/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/22/2014 11/3/2014 10/22/2014 $103,000 10/23/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/23/2014 10/23/2014 10/23/2014 $31,995 10/23/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/27/2014 10/27/2014 10/27/2014 $31,995 10/28/2014

C30001275 VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND 10/28/2014 11/4/2014 10/28/2014 $750,444 10/29/2014

C30001671 THE 60 PLUS ASSOCIATION 4/9/2014 4/10/2014 4/9/2014 $206,835 6/10/2014

C30001671 THE 60 PLUS ASSOCIATION 4/23/2014 4/24/2014 4/23/2014 $160,842 6/10/2014

C30001671 THE 60 PLUS ASSOCIATION 4/23/2014 4/30/2014 4/23/2014 $99,024 6/10/2014

C30001929 ENDING SPENDING INC 9/30/2014 10/3/2014 10/2/2014 $1,105,537 11/26/2014

C30001978 PATRIOTIC VETERANS, INC 10/21/2014 11/3/2014 10/21/2014 $30,000 12/10/2014

C30002216 STEPHEN VINCENT ANTHONY 1/1/2014 3/31/2014 1/15/2014 $0 1/15/2014

C30002232 CITIZENS FOR A SOUND GOVERNMENT 5/29/2014 5/29/2014 5/29/2014 $45,015 5/30/2014

C30002240 AMERICANS FOR A BALANCED BUDGET INC. 6/4/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 $28,020 6/6/2014

C30002257 THE ADVOCACY FUND 7/14/2014 7/15/2014 7/14/2014 $12,365 7/15/2014

C30002265 SOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY 4/6/2014 4/13/2014 4/6/2014 $369,915 7/25/2014

C30002273 CAROLINA RISING INC. 9/12/2014 9/15/2014 9/12/2014 $457,853 11/8/2014

C30002273 CAROLINA RISING INC. 9/15/2014 9/19/2014 9/15/2014 $805,551 11/8/2014

C30002273 CAROLINA RISING INC. 9/23/2014 10/5/2014 9/23/2014 $1,916,222 11/8/2014

C30002299 AMERICAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION 10/15/2014 10/20/2014 10/20/2014 $15,000 12/17/2014

C30002307 PAUL CAPRIO PRESIDENT PATRIOTIC VETERANS INC 1/1/2014 11/24/2014 11/24/2014 $24,500 12/2/2014

Total $7,338,285

Electioneering Communications Table 1

Electioneering Communications Reported*

January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014

*These totals do not include electioneering communications that were amended or newly filed in the referenced year and that disclosed disbursements from 

different years. Only electioneering communication disbursements made in the referenced year, for communications in that year, are included in these totals.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. A. Russell Peabody, Relator, *v.*Robert W. Chanler, as Sheriff of the County of Dutchess, et al., Respondents. Harry K. Thaw et al., Appellants.

*People ex rel. Peabody*v. *Ohanler,*183 App. Div. 159, affirmed.

(Argued October 6, 1909 ;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 4, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of habeas corpus.

*Francis S. Blade*and *Charles Morschauser*for appellants.

*Edward R.*O'Malley, Attorney-General, *William Travers*Jerome, *District Attorney (.Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed on opinions of Jenks and Rich, JJ., below.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: Chase, J.
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 12046A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1534

Mr. Dennis Dickinson

COO & Chief Pilot

SupraOptix, LLC

10971 Four Seasons Place, MB8

Crown Point, IN 46307

Dear Mr. Dickinson:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of SupraOptix, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for 

an amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from AerOptix, LLC to SupraOptix, 

LLC.

1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12046

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, SupraOptix, LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12046 remain in effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**




**HEARTLAND,
      INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum,
      Chief
      Financial Officer and member of the Board of Directors of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.




By:
      /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum


Jerry
      Gruenbaum


Chief
      Financial Officer,


Secretary
      and Director





August
      20, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Heartland, Inc., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### § 2522.400 What process does the Corporation use to select new grantees?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034, May 28, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615, Aug. 16, 2024.

The Corporation uses a multi-stage process, which may include review by panels of experts, Corporation staff review, and approval by the Chief Executive Officer or the Board of Directors, or their designee.

[70 FR 39600, July 8, 2005]
§ 2522.650 What happens if I fail to meet the performance measures included in my grant? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) If you are significantly under-performing based on the performance measures approved in your grant, or fail to collect appropriate data to allow performance measurement, the Corporation, or the State commission for formula grantees, may specify a period of correction, after consulting with you. As a grantee, you must report results at the end of the period of correction. At that point, if you continue to under-perform, or fail to collect appropriate data to allow performance measurement, the Corporation may take one or more of the following actions: ( 1 ) Reduce the amount of your grant;
( 2 ) Suspend or terminate your grant;
( 3 ) Use this information to assess any application from your organization for a new AmeriCorps grant or a new grant under another program administered by the Corporation;
( 4 ) Amend the terms of any Corporation grants to your organization; or
( 5 ) Take other actions that the Corporation deems appropriate.
( b ) If you are a State commission whose formula program(s) is significantly under-performing or failing to collect appropriate data to allow performance measurement, we encourage you to take action as delineated in paragraph (a) of this section.
[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
§ 327.13 Explosives, firearms, other weapons and fireworks. ( a ) The possession of loaded firearms, ammunition, loaded projectile firing devices, bows and arrows, crossbows, or other weapons is prohibited unless: ( 1 ) In the possession of a Federal, state or local law enforcement officer;
( 2 ) Being used for hunting or fishing as permitted under § 327.8, with devices being unloaded when transported to, from or between hunting and fishing sites;
( 3 ) Being used at authorized shooting ranges; or
( 4 ) Written permission has been received from the District Commander.
( b ) Possession of explosives or explosive devices of any kind, including fireworks or other pyrotechnics, is prohibited unless written permission has been received from the District Commander.
[65 FR 6901, Feb. 11, 2000]
§ 2517.700 Are matching funds required? ( a ) Yes. The Corporation share of the cost of carrying out a program funded under this part may not exceed— ( 1 ) Ninety percent of the total cost for the first year for which the program receives assistance;
( 2 ) Eighty percent of the total cost for the second year;
( 3 ) Seventy percent of the total cost for the third year; and
( 4 ) Fifty percent of the total cost for the fourth year and any subsequent year.
( b ) In providing for the remaining share of the cost of carrying out a program, each recipient of assistance must provide for that share through a payment in cash or in kind, fairly evaluated, including facilities, equipment, or services, and may provide for that share through State sources, local sources, or Federal sources (other than funds made available under the national service laws).
( c ) However, the Corporation may waive the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section in whole or in part with respect to any program in any fiscal year if the Corporation determines that the waiver would be equitable due to lack of available financial resources at the local level.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the“Company”) on

Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange

Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned,Brad J. Moynes, President of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

 

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the

Financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

By:

 

 

/s/ Brad J. Moynes

Brad J. Moynes

President

August13, 2013