62366 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by December 1, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD replaces AD 2014–06–08, 

Amendment 39–17812 (79 FR 17390, March 

28, 2014). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model 

DHC–8–101, –102, –103, –106, –201, –202, 

–301, –311, and –315 airplanes, certificated 

in any category, serial numbers 003 through 

672 inclusive. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 32, Landing gear. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a report that the 

emergency downlock indication system 

(EDIS) had given a false landing gear downand-locked indication and a determination 

that a terminating action modification is 

necessary to address the identified unsafe 

condition. We are issuing this AD to detect 

and correct a false down-and-locked landing 

gear indication, which, on landing, could 

result in possible collapse of the landing 

gear. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Retained Functional Check With Repair 

Approval Clarification 

This paragraph restates the requirements of 

paragraph (g) of AD 2014–06–08, 

Amendment 39–17812 (79 FR 17390, March 

28, 2014), with specific delegation approval 

language. Within 600 flight hours or 100 

days, whichever occurs first after April 14, 

2014 (the effective date of AD 2014–06–08): 

Perform a functional check of the alternate 

indication phototransistors of the nose and 

main landing gear; and do all applicable 

corrective actions; in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 8–32–173, Revision A, dated 

December 17, 2012; except where 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–32–173, 

Revision A, dated December 17, 2012, 

specifies to contact the manufacturer for 

further instructions, before further, flight, 

repair using a method approved by the 

Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 

Office, ANE–170, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil 

Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA 

Design Approval Organization (DAO). Do all 

applicable corrective actions before further 

flight. Repeat the functional check thereafter 

at intervals not to exceed 600 flight hours or 

100 days, whichever occurs first, until 

accomplishment of the applicable actions 

specified in paragraph (h) of this AD. 

(h) New Requirement of This AD: 

Terminating Action 

Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months 

after the effective date of this AD, whichever 

occurs first: Do the applicable actions 

specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(3) 

of this AD. Accomplishment of the 

applicable actions specified in paragraphs 

(h)(1) through (h)(3) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. 

(1) For airplanes configured as described in 

Modsum 8/1519: Incorporate Modsum 

8Q101968, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 8–33–56, Revision A, dated 

February 22, 2013. 

(2) For airplanes configured as described in 

Modsum 8/0235, 8/0461, and 8/0534: 

Incorporate Modsum 8Q101955, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 

8–32–176, Revision A, dated February 22, 

2013. 

(3) For airplanes not configured as 

described in Modsum 8/0534: Incorporate 

Modsum 8Q101969, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 8–32–177, dated October 9, 

2013. 

(i) Credit for Previous Actions 

(1) This paragraph provides credit for 

actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 8–32–173, dated October 28, 

2011, which is not incorporated by reference 

in this AD. 

(2) This paragraph provides credit for 

actions required by paragraph (h)(1) of this 

AD, if those actions were performed before 

the effective date of this AD using 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–33–56, dated 

February 11, 2013, which is not incorporated 

by reference in this AD. 

(3) This paragraph provides credit for 

actions required by paragraph (h)(2) of this 

AD, if those actions were performed before 

the effective date of this AD using 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–32–176, dated 

February 11, 2013, which is not incorporated 

by reference in this AD. 

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 

39.19, send your request to your principal 

inspector or local Flight Standards District 

Office, as appropriate. If sending information 

directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 

telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the 

effective date of this AD, for any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer, the action must be 

accomplished using a method approved by 

the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 

Office, ANE–170, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, 

Inc.’s TCCA DAO. If approved by the DAO, 

the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–11, dated 

February 13, 2014, for related information. 

This MCAI may be found in the AD docket 

on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0752. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series 

Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard, 

Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; 

telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–375–4539; 

email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; 

Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You 

may view this service information at the 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 24, 2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24696 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0293; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–ANE–5] 

Proposed Establishment of Class E 

Airspace; Plainville, CT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class E Airspace at Plainville, 

CT, to accommodate new Area 

Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning 

System (GPS) Standard Instrument 

Approach Procedures (SIAPs) serving 

Robertson Field Airport. This action 

would enhance the safety and airspace 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) operations within the National 

Airspace System. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 1, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule 

to: U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules 62367 

0001; Telephone: 1–800–647–5527; Fax: 

202–493–2251. You must identify the 

Docket Number FAA–2014–0293; 

Airspace Docket No. 14–ANE–5, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit and review received 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this rule by submitting 

such written data, views, or arguments, 

as they may desire. Comments that 

provide the factual basis supporting the 

views and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned regulatory decisions on the 

proposal. Comments are specifically 

invited on the overall regulatory, 

aeronautical, economic, environmental, 

and energy-related aspects of the 

proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0293; Airspace Docket No. 14– 

ANE–5) and be submitted in triplicate to 

the Docket Management System (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Persons wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0293; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–ANE–5.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 

public contact with FAA personnel 

concerned with this rulemaking will be 

filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded from and 

comments submitted through http://

www.regulations.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s Web 

page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_

airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal Holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined between 

8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal 

Holidays, at the office of the Eastern 

Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 350, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 

30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of 

Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking distribution 

System, which describes the application 

procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is considering an 

amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish 

Class E airspace at Plainville, CT, 

providing the controlled airspace 

required to support the new RNAV 

(GPS) standard instrument approach 

procedures for Robertson Field Airport. 

Controlled airspace extending upward 

from 700 feet above the surface within 

a 9.5-mile radius of the airport would be 

established for IFR operations. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 

order 7400.9Y, dated August 8, 2014, 

and effective September 15, 2014, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This proposed 

rulemaking is promulgated under the 

authority described in Subtitle VII, Part, 

A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This proposed regulation is 

within the scope of that authority as it 

would establish Class E airspace at 

Robertson Field Airport, Plainville, CT. 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9Y, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 8, 2014, effective 

September 15, 2014, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward from 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANE CT E5 Plainville, CT [New] 

Robertson Field Airport, CT 

(Lat. 41°41′22′′ N., long. 72°51′53′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 9.5-mile 

radius of Robertson Field Airport. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

62368 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

1 In the EPA’s 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS revision, we 

left unchanged the existing welfare (secondary) 

standards for PM2.5 to address PM-related effects 

such as visibility impairment, ecological effects, 

damage to materials and climate impacts. This 

includes an annual secondary standard of 15.0 mg/ 

m 3 and a 24-hour standard of 35 mg/m 3. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 

7, 2014. 

Myron A. Jenkins, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24616 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2014–0744, FRL–9918–05– 

Region 10] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Washington: 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

Fine Particulate Matter National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to partially 

approve and partially disapprove the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

submittal from Washington 

demonstrating that the SIP meets the 

infrastructure requirements of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) 

promulgated for fine particulate matter 

(PM2.5) on July 18, 1997, October 17, 

2006, and December 14, 2012 

(collectively the PM2.5 NAAQS). The 

CAA requires that each state, after a new 

or revised NAAQS is promulgated, 

review their SIP to ensure that it meets 

the infrastructure requirements 

necessary to implement the new or 

revised NAAQS. On September 22, 

2014, Washington certified that the 

Washington SIP meets the infrastructure 

requirements of the CAA for the PM2.5

NAAQS, except for those requirements 

related to the Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) permitting program 

currently operated under a Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP), certain 

elements of the regional haze program 

currently operated under a FIP, and 

specific requirements related to 

interstate transport which will be 

addressed in a separate submittal. The 

EPA is proposing to find that 

Washington’s SIP is adequate for 

purposes of the infrastructure SIP 

requirements of the CAA with the 

exceptions noted above. The EPA is 

proposing to find that the SIP 

deficiencies related to PSD permitting 

and regional haze, however, have been 

adequately addressed by the existing 

EPA FIPs and, therefore, no further 

action is required by Washington or the 

EPA for those elements. The EPA will 

address the remaining interstate 

transport requirements in a separate 

action. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 17, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

OAR–2014–0744, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Email: R10-Public_Comments@

epa.gov. 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Mail: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT– 

150), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, 

Seattle, WA 98101. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Region 10 

Mailroom, 9th Floor, 1200 Sixth 

Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. 

Attention: Jeff Hunt, Office of Air, Waste 

and Toxics, AWT–107. Such deliveries 

are only accepted during normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2014– 

0744. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Do not submit information that 

you consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption, and be free of any 

defects or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy 

during normal business hours at the 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, 

WA 98101. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Hunt at: (206) 553–0256, hunt.jeff@

epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 

address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is 

intended to refer to the EPA. 

Information is organized as follows: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. CAA Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Elements 

III. The EPA’s Approach to Review of 

Infrastructure SIP Submittals 

IV. Analysis of the State’s Submittal 

V. Proposed Action 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

On July 18, 1997, the EPA 

promulgated a new 24-hour and a new 

annual NAAQS for PM2.5 (62 FR 38652). 

On October 17, 2006, the EPA revised 

the standards for PM2.5, tightening the 

24-hour PM2.5 standard from 65 

micrograms per cubic meter (m/m 3) to 

35 m/m 3, and retaining the annual PM2.5

standard at 15 m/m 3 (71 FR 61144). 

Subsequently, on December 14, 2012, 

the EPA revised the level of the health 

based (primary) annual PM2.5 standard 

to 12 m/m 3 (78 FR 3086, published 

January 15, 2013).1

States must submit SIPs meeting the 

requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) 

and (2) within three years after 

promulgation of a new or revised 

standard. CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

require states to address basic SIP 

requirements, including emissions 

inventories, monitoring, and modeling 

to implement, maintain, and enforce the 

standards, so-called ‘‘infrastructure’’ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS