alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS 

Monday, January 31, 2005

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 6

CONVENED JANUARY 4, 2005

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

 [NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 7 3 Samuel W. Bodman, of Massachusetts, to be 

Secretary of Energy, vice Spencer Abraham, 

resigned. 

Jan 26, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Domenici, Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

8 12 Alberto R. Gonzales, of Texas, to be Attorney 

General, vice John Ashcroft, resigned. 

Jan 26, 2005 Reported by Mr. 

Specter, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-160580) on Form F-3 of our reports dated September 26, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited and subsidiaries (the “Company”)(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the convenience translation of the Indian Rupee into United States dollar amounts) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited for the year ended March 31, 2011. We also consent to the reference to us in Item 3A. Selected Consolidated Financial Data.

/s/ Deloitte Haskins & Sells 

Deloitte Haskins & Sells 

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 

September 26, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 41 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 41

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and 
 Immigration Services and the Executive Officer for Immigration Review 
           relating to ``Circumvention of Lawful Pathways''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Tuberville, 
 Ms. Lummis, Mr. Budd, Mr. Daines, and Mrs. Hyde-Smith) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and 
 Immigration Services and the Executive Officer for Immigration Review 
           relating to ``Circumvention of Lawful Pathways''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and 
the Executive Officer for Immigration Review relating to 
``Circumvention of Lawful Pathways'' (88 Fed. Reg. 31314 (May, 16, 
2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–678 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2679, VETERANS’ MEMORIALS, 

BOY SCOUTS, PUBLIC SEALS, AND OTHER PUBLIC EXPRESSIONS OF RELIGION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1038] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1038, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2679, the 

Veterans’ Memorials, Boy Scouts, Public Seals, and Other Public 

Expressions of Religion Protection Act of 2006, under a closed rule. 

The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided 

and controlled by the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute as reported by the Committee on the Judiciary shall be considered as adopted. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of H. Res. 

1000 (relating to a list of earmarks contained in the bill or report 

thereon). The Committee believes this waiver to be technical in nature as a review of the bill and report did not reveal any earmarks 

within the meaning of H. Res. 1000, and the Committee on the Judiciary failed to include a statement to that effect. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with REPORTS
2 

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 243 

Date: September 25, 2006. 

Measure: H.R. 2679, Veterans’ Memorials, Boy Scouts, Public 

Seals, and Other Public Expressions of Religion Protection Act of 

2006. 

Motion by: Mrs. Slaughter. 

Summary of motion: To report an open rule. 

Results: Defeated 4 to 5. 

Vote by members: Diaz-Balart—Nay; Hastings (WA)—Nay; Putnam—Nay; Capito—Nay; Gingrey—Nay; Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with REPORTS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report of
BlueFire Renewables, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arnold Klann, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 16, 2012 | By: | /s/ Arnold Klann                                              | 
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                     |     | Arnold Klann                                                  | 
|                     |     | Principal Financial Officer
        BlueFire Renewables, Inc. |
#### § 2105.2 What kinds of records are not covered by the regulations in this part?

In the event that the Agency identifies records that may be subject to exclusion from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), the agency must confer with legal counsel and the Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy, to obtain approval to apply the exclusion.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Revision of the Cancellation of Preparation of Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for Ontario International Airport, Ontario, San 
Bernardino County, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Revision of Notice of Cancellation of Preparation of 
Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 1, 2006, the FAA terminated preparation of the EIS 
at Ontario International Airport (ONT) since there are no proposed 
projects ripe for review. Los Angeles World Airports, the airport 
owner, will continue to prepare a master plan for ONT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victor Globa, Environmental Protection 
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Los Angeles Airports 
District Office, P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, California 90009-2007, 
Telephone: (310) 725-3637.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 1, 2006, the FAA issued a notice 
announcing it was canceling preparation of an EIS for Ontario 
International Airport, Ontario, San Bernardino County, California in 
the Federal Register (71 FR 74573). FAA is revising its notice to 
clarify Los Angeles World Airports will continue to prepare a master 
plan for ONT.

    Dated: Issued In Hawthorne, California, on December 13, 2006.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western-Pacific Region, AWP-600.
[FR Doc. 06-9783 Filed 12-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)                The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Glenn D. BolducGlenn
      D. BolducPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      June 12, 2009







This
certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1581. SILVERSTONE RESIDENTIAL, LLC et al v. PREMIER

RESIDENTIAL SE, LLC.

Premier Residential SE, LLC (“Premier”), sued Silverstone Residential, LLC

(“SR”), and Steve Connor. SR and Connor asserted counterclaims against Premier

and third-party claims against additional defendants, including Silverstone

Residential Georgia, LLC’s(“SRG”). After a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor

of SR and Connor against Premier and some of the third-party defendants. However,

the trial court granted SRG’s motion for a directed verdict on the claims asserted

against it by SR and Connor. The court entered final judgment on April 4, 2022.

Within 30 days, SR and Connor filed a notice of appeal from the directed verdict

order and a previous order partially granting summary judgment to some of the thirdparty defendants. One day later, Premier and several third-party defendants filed a

timely motion for new trial. SR and Connor’s appeal has now been docketed in this

Court, but we lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal ordinarily divests a trial court of its jurisdiction to act in a

case. See Jones v. State, 309 Ga. App. 149, 149 (1) (709 SE2d 593) (2011). Where,

however, both a notice of appeal and motion for new trial are timely filed, the trial

court retains jurisdiction to rule on the motion for new trial, and any appeal is

premature. See id. at 149-150 (1).

Even though a notice of appeal may divest the trial court of jurisdiction,

. . . such divestiture does not become effective during the period in

which a motion for new trial may be filed. In the event a motion for new

July 14, 2022
trial is timely filed . . . , the effectiveness of the divestiture of

jurisdiction is then delayed until the motion for new trial is ruled upon

and a notice of appeal to the ruling has been filed or the period for

appealing the ruling has expired.

Id. at 149 (1). Accordingly, this direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See Home Ins.

Co. v. Fort Valley Mills, 132 Ga. App. 15, 15 (207 SE2d 590) (1974).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/14/2022
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATIONS



I, David (Xiaoying) Gao, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Biologic Products, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: April 28, 2017



|/s/ David (Xiaoying) Gao      | 
|----------------------------- | 
|David (Xiaoying) Gao          | 
|Chief Executive Officer       | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) |
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Liccardo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Amnis Systems Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Amnis Systems Inc.

Date: December 19, 2002

/s/ Michael A. Liccardo
------------------------
Michael A. Liccardo
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       16
<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            687 - INDS 2006-2B UBS/BS



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,989
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       455,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,302
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           90,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (254,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (254,070)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (254,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
§ 2556.305 What is the duration and scope of service for a VISTA? ( a ) To serve as a VISTA, an individual makes a full-time commitment for a minimum of one year, without regard to regular working hours.
( b ) A VISTA carries out activities in accordance with the purpose of the VISTA program, as described in § 2556.1.
( c ) To the maximum extent practicable, the VISTA must live among and at the economic level of the low-income community served by the project.
( d ) A VISTA carries out service activities in conformance with the sponsor's approved project application, including any description of a VISTA assignment as contained in the project application; and in conformance with the purpose of title I of the DVSA. In any case where there is a conflict between the project application and the DVSA, the DVSA takes precedence.
( e ) Under no circumstances may an individual be enrolled to serve as a VISTA beyond five years.
#### § 910.31 High architectural quality.

*Development* must maintain a uniformly high standard of architecture, representative of the best contemporary design and planning concepts. Great care and sensitivity must be shown in the architectural treatment of new buildings, particularly in terms of massing, facade design (including materials, composition, and detailing), the ground floor and sidewalk pedestrian environment, interior public spaces, and provisions for pedestrian and vehicular *access.* Special design considerations for each *coordinated planning area* are set forth in *Square Guidelines.*
#### § 2540.620 What are my rights if the Corporation determines that I have made a false or misleading statement?

If the Corporation determines that you have made a false or misleading statement in connection with your eligibility for a benefit from, or qualification to participate in, a Corporation-funded program, you will be hand delivered a written notice, or sent a written notice to your last known street address or e-mail address or that of your identified counsel at least 15 days before any proposed action is taken. The notice will include the facts surrounding the determination and the action the Corporation proposes to take. The notice will also identify the reviewing official in your case and provide other pertinent information. You will be allowed to show good cause as to why forfeiture, revocation, the denial of a benefit, or other action should not be implemented. You will be given 10 calendar days to submit written materials in opposition to the proposed action.