68766 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 13.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

EADS SOCATA: Docket No. FAA–2006–

26180; Directorate Identifier 2006–CE–

59–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by 

December 28, 2006. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Model TBM 700 

airplanes, serial numbers 285 through 304 

and 307, certificated in any category. 

Reason 

(d) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states the 

discovery of propeller control cables with a 

defective crimping. Two cable ends were 

found uncrimped at the factory after an 

engine run-up test, and one cable end was 

also found uncrimped on the first 100-hour 

time-in-service aircraft maintenance check. If 

not corrected, as incorrect crimping of the 

propeller control lever cable could generate 

a decrease of the propeller revolutions per 

minute which could result in loss of power. 

Actions and Compliance 

(e) Unless already done, within the next 50 

hours time-in-service (TIS), inspect for the 

batch number identification and replace 

defective control cables as necessary in 

accordance with the paragraph B. of the 

‘‘ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS’’ of 

EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory 

Alert Service Bulletin SB 70–123, ATA No. 

76, dated October 2004. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: 

(a) The requirement of paragraph 3.1 for 

the operational procedure was based on the 

urgency in November 2004. However, in 

November 2006, this action is not necessary. 

(2) For the requirement of paragraph 3.2, 

the seriousness of the condition warrants a 

compliance time of 50 hours TIS instead of 

25 hours TIS. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(f) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff, 

FAA, ATTN: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace 

Safety Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane 

Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas 

City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–

4119, fax: (816) 329–4090, has the authority 

to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR part 

39.19. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et.seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(g) Refer to MCAI Director Ge ́ne ́rale de l’

Aviation Civile Airworthiness Directive No. 

F–2004–175, dated November 10, 2004, and 

EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory 

Alert Service Bulletin SB 70–123, ATA No. 

76, dated October 2004, for related 

information. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

November 20, 2006. 

David R. Showers, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–9429 Filed 11–27–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–25926; Directorate 

Identifier 2000–CE–17–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Short 

Brothers & Harland Ltd. Models SC–7 

Series 2 and SC–7 Series 3 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to revise 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003–17–

05, which applies to all Short Brothers 

& Harland Ltd. (Shorts) Models SC–7 

Series 2 and SC–7 Series 3 airplanes. 

AD 2003–17–05 currently establishes a 

technical service life for these airplanes 

and allows you to incorporate 

modifications, inspections, and 

replacements of certain life limited 

items to extend the life limits of these 

airplanes. Since we issued AD 2003–17–

05, Shorts Service Bulletin SB 51–51 

was revised to Revision 8, dated July 5, 

2006, and the European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 

Agent for the Member States of the 

European Community, issued an AD for 

the European Community to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

product. AD 2003–17–05 contains 

conflicting information on the repetitive 

visual inspection requirement. 

Consequently, this proposed AD would 

retain the technical service life for these 

airplanes; would continue to allow 

modifications, inspections, and 

replacements of certain life limited 

items to extend the life limits of these 

airplanes; and would clarify the 

repetitive visual inspection requirement 

between one of the service bulletins and 

the maintenance program if an operator 

chooses to extend the life limit. The 

actions specified by this proposed AD 

are intended to clarify the inspection 

information to prevent failure of critical 

structure of the aircraft caused by 

fatigue. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by December 28, 

2006. 

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following 

addresses to comment on this proposed 

AD: 

• DOT Docket Web site: Go to 

http://dms.dot.gov and follow the 

instructions for sending your comments 

electronically. 

• Government-wide rulemaking Web 

site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov 

and follow the instructions for sending 

your comments electronically. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, 

Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–

0001. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 

400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Short 

Brothers PLC, P.O. Box 241, Airport 

Road, Belfast BT3 9DZ Northern Ireland; 

telephone: +44 (0) 28 9045 8444; 

facsimile: +44 (0) 28 9073 3396. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 

Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–

4059; facsimile: (816) 329–4090. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments 

regarding this proposed AD. Send your 

comments to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include the docket 

number, ‘‘FAA–2006–25926; Directorate 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules 68767 

Identifier: 2000–CE–17–AD’’ at the 

beginning of your comments. We 

specifically invite comments on the 

overall regulatory, economic, 

environmental, and energy aspects of 

the proposed AD. We will consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and may amend the proposed AD in 

light of those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

dms.dot.gov, including any personal 

information you provide. We will also 

post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

concerning this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

Mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information (MCAI) issued by the 

airworthiness authority for the United 

Kingdom on all Shorts Models SC–7 

Series 2 and SC–7 Series 3 airplanes 

caused us to issue AD 2003–17–05, 

Amendment 39–13279 (68 FR 50689, 

August 22, 2003). AD 2003–17–05 

established a technical service life for 

these airplanes and allows you to 

incorporate modifications, inspections, 

and replacements of certain life limited 

items to extend the life limits of these 

airplanes. 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member State of the European 

Community, notified the FAA of the 

need to revise AD 2003–17–05 to 

address an unsafe condition that may 

exist or could develop on all Shorts 

Models SC–7 Series 2 and SC–7 Series 

3 airplanes. This proposed AD results 

from conflicting information on the 

repetitive inspection requirement 

between one of the service bulletins and 

the maintenance program if an operator 

chooses to extend the life limit. 

The life limits, if not complied with, 

could result in failure of the primary 

structural components and possibly 

result in structural failure during flight. 

Relevant Service Information 

We received and included the 

following in AD 2003–17–05 to extend 

the life limit when incorporated: 

—Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51–51, 

Revision No.: 6, dated: March 14, 

1983; 

—Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51–52, 

Revision No.: 4, dated: July 16, 2002; 

and 

—Shorts Skyvan Maintenance Program, 

Amendment List No. 22, dated May 7, 

2003 (any future revision to this 

maintenance program that 

incorporates the language and intent 

is acceptable to use). 

Since issuance of AD 2003–17–05, we 

reviewed (and included in this NPRM) 

Shorts Service Bulletin Number 51–51, 

Revision No: 8, dated July 5, 2006; and 

Shorts Skyvan Maintenance Program, 

Amendment List No. 23, dated 

December 14, 2004. 

Foreign Airworthiness Authority 

Information 

EASA classified Shorts Service 

Bulletin Number 51–51, Revision No: 8, 

dated July 5, 2006, as mandatory and 

issued EASA AD Number 2006–0190, 

dated July 6, 2006, to ensure the 

continued airworthiness of these 

airplanes in the EU. 

These Shorts Models SC–7 Series 2 

and SC–7 Series 3 airplanes are 

manufactured in the United Kingdom 

and are type-certified for operation in 

the United States under the provisions 

of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the 

applicable bilateral airworthiness 

agreement. 

Under this bilateral airworthiness 

agreement, EASA has kept us informed 

of the situation described above. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of the Proposed AD 

We are proposing this AD because we 

have examined EASA’s findings, 

evaluated all information and 

determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design that are certificated for 

operation in the United States. 

This proposed AD would revise AD 

2003–17–05 with a new AD that would 

retain the technical service life for these 

airplanes; would continue to allow 

modifications, inspections, and 

replacements of certain life limited 

items to extend the life limits of these 

airplanes; and would clarify the 

repetitive visual inspection requirement 

between one of the service bulletins and 

the maintenance program if an operator 

chooses to extend the life limit. This 

proposed AD would require you to use 

the service information described 

previously to perform these actions. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

would affect 22 airplanes in the U.S. 

registry. 

Since the action of the proposed AD 

is life-limiting the structural airframe, 

the actual operating cost of this AD is 

the cost of the airplane minus any nonlife-limited parts that are salvageable 

and can be sold. There is no cost impact 

difference in this proposed AD to revise 

AD 2003–17–05 than that originally 

presented in AD 2003–17–05, except for 

the recalculation of the labor costs using 

the revised figure of $80 per hour 

instead of $65 per hour. 

The following paragraphs present the 

costs if you choose to incorporate the 

inspections and modifications necessary 

to extend the life limit. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

the proposed optional aircraft life 

extension on 16 airplanes (all airplanes 

that do not have serial number SH1845, 

SH1883, SH1847, SH1889, SH1943, or 

SH1960) as prescribed in Shorts Service 

Bulletin No. 51–51: 

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

350 work-hours × $80 per hour = $28,000 ................................................................................. $90,000 $118,000 $1,888,000 

We estimate the following to do the 

proposed aircraft life extension 

prescribed in Shorts Service Bulletin 

No. 51–52 (which includes Service 

Bulletin 51–51) for serial numbers 1889, 

1943, and 1960: 

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

470 work-hours × $80 per hour = $37,600 ................................................................................. $112,000 $149,600 $448,800 

We estimate the following to do the 

proposed aircraft life extension 

prescribed in Shorts Service Bulletin 

No. 51–52 for serial numbers 1845, 

1847, and 1883: 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
68768 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules 

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

120 work-hours × $80 per hour = $9,600 ................................................................................... $22,000 $31,600 $94,800

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in subtitle VII, 

part A, subpart III, section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket that 

contains the proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information on the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 

(800) 647–5227) is located at the street 

address in the ADDRESSES section. 

Comments will be available in the AD 

docket shortly after receipt. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

2003–17–05, Amendment 39–13279 (68 

FR 50689, August 22, 2003), and adding 

the following new AD: 

Short Brothers & Harland Ltd.: Docket No. 

FAA–2006–25926; Directorate Identifier 

2000–CE–17–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments on this 

airworthiness directive (AD) action by 

December 28, 2006. 

Affected ADs 

(b) This AD revises AD 2003–17–05, 

Amendment 39–13279. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Models SC–7 Series 

2 and SC–7 Series 3 airplanes, all serial 

numbers, that are certificated in any category. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This revised AD results from conflicting 

information of the repetitive inspection 

requirement between one of the service 

bulletins and the maintenance program if an 

operator chooses to extend the life limit. We 

are issuing this AD to clarify the inspection 

information to prevent failure of critical 

structure of the aircraft caused by fatigue. 

Compliance 

(e) Do not operate the airplane upon 

accumulating the applicable life limit or 

within the next 90 days after September 29, 

2003 (the effective date of AD 2003–17–05), 

whichever occurs later. For owners/operators 

that do not have a record of the number of 

flights on the aircraft, assume the number of 

flights on the basis of two per operating hour. 

The following table presents the life limits: 

TABLE 1.—ORIGINAL LIFE LIMITS

Serial No. Life limit 

(1) SH1845 and SH1883 .......................................................................... 10,000 hours time-in-service (TIS). 

(2) SH1847 ............................................................................................... 15,200 hours TIS. 

(3) SH1889 ............................................................................................... 13,805 flights. 

(4) SH1943 ............................................................................................... 11,306 flights. 

(5) SH1960 ............................................................................................... 4,142 flights. 

(6) All airplanes that do not have serial number SH1845, SH1883, 

SH1847, SH1889, SH1943, or SH1960.

20,000 flights. 

(f) For airplanes with serial numbers 

SH1845, SH1847, or SH1883: You can extend 

the life limits by doing the actions of Shorts 

Service Bulletin No. 51–52, Revision No.: 4, 

dated: July 16, 2002 (and all service 

information or modifications referenced in 

the Planning Information section of the 

service bulletin), and Shorts Skyvan 

Maintenance Program, Amendment List No. 

22, dated May 7, 2003, or Amendment List 

No. 23, dated December 14, 2004, or future 

revisions. Any future revisions to this 

maintenance program shall not change the 

inspection intervals, requirements, or the life 

limits of this AD. The following table 

presents the extended life limit: 

TABLE 2.—EXTENDED LIFE LIMITS

AFTER INCORPORATION OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

(1) SH1845 ................ 13,456 hours TIS. 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules 68769 

TABLE 2.—EXTENDED LIFE LIMITS

AFTER INCORPORATION OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS—Continued 

(2) SH1847 ................ 20,200 hours TIS. 

(3) SH1883 ................ 15,000 hours TIS. 

(g) For airplanes with serial numbers 

SH1889, SH1943, or SH1960: You can extend 

the life limits by doing the actions of Shorts 

Service Bulletin No. 51–52, Revision No.: 4, 

dated: July 16, 2002 (and all service 

information or modification referenced in the 

Planning Information section of the service 

bulletin including Shorts Service Bulletin 

No. 51–51, Revision No.: 6, dated: March 14, 

1983; or Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51–51, 

Revision No.: 8, dated: July 5, 2006. You 

cannot use Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51–

51, Revision No.: 7, dated January 2005.), and 

Shorts Skyvan Maintenance Program, 

Amendment List No. 22, dated May 7, 2003, 

or Amendment List No. 23, dated December 

14, 2004, or future revisions. Any future 

revisions to this maintenance program shall 

not change the inspeciton intervals, 

requirements, or the life limits of this AD. 

The following table presents the extended 

life limit: 

TABLE 3.—EXTENDED LIFE LIMITS

AFTER INCORPORATION OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

Serial No. Extended life limit 

(1) SH1889: ............... 20,094 flights. 

(2) SH1943: ............... 17,325 flights. 

(3) SH1960: ............... 8,449 flights. 

(h) For airplanes that do not encompass 

either serial number SH1845, SH1847, 

SH1883, SH1889, SH1943, or SH1960: You 

can extend the life limit to 27,000 flights by 

doing the actions of Shorts Service Bulletin 

No. 51–51, Revision No.: 6, dated: March 14, 

1983; or Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51–51, 

Revision No.: 8, dated: July 5, 2006; and 

Shorts Skyvan Maintenance Program, 

Amendment List No. 22, dated May 7, 2003; 

or Amendment List No. 23, dated December 

14, 2004; or future revisions. Any future 

revisions to this mainenance program shall 

not change the inspection intervals, 

requirements, or the life limits of this AD. 

You cannot use Shorts Service Bulletin No. 

51–51, Revision No.: 7, dated: January 2005. 

(i) The repetitive visual inspection 

requirements using Shorts Service Bulletin 

No. 57–59, which is referenced on page 3 of 

Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51–51, Revision 

No.: 6, dated: March 14, 1983, paragraph C 

(Special limitations) are every 2,400 flights 

and the repetitive visual inspeciton program 

in Skyvan Maintenance Program, 

Maintenance Program Appendix 1, parts A 

and B (Section 57–00, Item 3), are every 

1,100 flights or 800 hours TIS intervals, 

whichever occurs first. You msut use the 

repetitive inspection intervals of the Skyvan 

Maintenance Program for the repetitive 

inspection of the wing structure, skin, and 

skin doublers to be every 1,100 flights or 800 

hours TIS, whichever occurs first and not the 

2,400 flights as stated in Shorts Service 

Bulletin No. 51–51, Revisions No.: 6, dated: 

March 14, 1983. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(j) The Manager, Standards Office, Small 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, ATTN: Doug 

Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small 

Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: 

(816) 329–4059; facsimile: (816) 329–4090, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(k) AMOCs approved for AD 2003–17–05 

are approved for this AD. 

Related Information 

(1) The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA) AD No.: 2006–0190, dated July 6, 

2006, also addresses the subject of this AD. 

To get copies of the service information 

referenced in this AD, contact Short Brothers 

PLC, P.O. Box 241, Airport Road, Belfast BT3 

9DZ Northern Ireland; telephone: +44 (0) 28 

9045 8444; facsimile: +44 (0) 28 9073 3396. 

To view the AD docket, go to the Docket 

Management Facility; U.S. Department of 

Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., 

Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, 

DC, or on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. 

The docket number is Docket No. FAA–

2006–25926; Directorate Identifier 2000–CE–

17–AD. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

November 20, 2006. 

David R. Showers, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–9427 Filed 11–27–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–26314; Airspace 

Docket No. 06–AAL–37] 

Proposed Revision of Class E 

Airspace; Mekoryuk, AK 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to revise 

Class E airspace at Mekoryuk, AK. Three 

new Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures (SIAPs) are being developed 

for the Mekoryuk Airport. Amendments 

to a Departure Procedure (DP) and two 

SIAPs are also being developed. 

Adoption of this proposal wouldresult 

in revision of existing Class E airspace 

upward from 700 feet (ft.) above the 

surface at Mekoryuk Airport, Mekoryuk, 

AK. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 12, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the 

proposal to the Docket Management 

System, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590–0001. You must identify the 

docket number FAA–2006–26314/ 

Airspace Docket No. 06-AAL–37, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the 

public docket containing the proposal, 

any comments received, and any final 

disposition in person in the Dockets 

Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 

1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level 

of the Department of Transportation 

NASSIF Building at the above address. 

An informal docket may also be 

examined during normal business hours 

at the office of the Manager, Safety, 

Alaska Flight Service Operations, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 222 

West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, 

AK 99513–7587. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

Rolf, Federal Aviation Administration, 

222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, 

Anchorage, AK 99513–7587; telephone 

number (907) 271–5898; fax: (907) 271–

2850; e-mail: gary.ctr.rolf@faa.gov. 

Internet address: http:// 

www.alaska.faa.gov/at. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2006–26314/Airspace 

Docket No. 06–AAL–37.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS