70646 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 

partnership, association, or corporation, 

service may similarly be made by 

service on any member of the 

partnership or any officer, employee, or 

agent of the association or corporation. 

Interpretive Rules 

§ 33.50 Apples for processing. 

The terms ‘‘apples for processing’’ as 

used in § 33.12 of this part apply only 

and is restricted to packages of apples 

which were originally packaged for 

processing and marked ‘‘Cannery’’ as 

required by § 33.12(c) of this part. 

Packages of apples not so originally 

packaged and marked are not eligible for 

certification as ‘‘apples for processing’’

for purposes of this part. 

§ 33.60 OMB control number assigned 

pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act. 

The OMB control number assigned 

pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 

Act for this part is OMB No. 0581–0143. 

Dated: December 1, 2006. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E6–20659 Filed 12–5–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 981 

[Docket No. FV06–981–2 C] 

Almonds Grown in California; Changes 

to Incoming Quality Control 

Requirements; Correction 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing 

Service (AMS) published in the Federal 

Register on November 8, 2006, a 

document concerning quality control 

requirements under the California 

almond marketing order. Language was 

inadvertently omitted in the regulatory 

text to specify that the changes apply to 

all almonds received by handlers 

beginning August 1, 2006. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 6, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maureen T. Pello, Assistant Regional 

Manager, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional 

Manager, California Marketing Field 

Office, Marketing Order Administration 

Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 

AMS, USDA, telephone: (559) 487–

5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or e-mail: 

Maureen.Pello@usda.gov, or 

Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The AMS 

published a document in the Federal 

Register on November 8, 2006 (71 FR 

65373) that inadvertently omitted 

language in the regulatory text to 

indicate that the changes apply to all 

almonds received by handlers beginning 

August 1, 2006. This document corrects 

the regulatory text. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981 

Almonds, Marketing agreements, 

Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

■ Accordingly, 7 CFR part 981 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN 

CALIFORNIA 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 981 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674 

■ 2. In § 981.442 revise the first 

sentence of paragraph (a)(4)(i) and the 

11th sentence in paragraph (a)(5) to read 

as follows: 

§ 981.442 Quality Control. 

(a) * * * 

(4) Disposition obligation. (i) 

Beginning August 1, 2006, the weight of 

inedible kernels in excess of 0.50 

percent of kernel weight reported to the 

Board of any variety received by a 

handler shall constitute that handler’s 

disposition obligation. * * * 

(5) * * * Beginning August 1, 2006, 

at least 50 percent of a handler’s total 

crop year inedible disposition obligation 

shall be satisfied with dispositions 

consisting of inedible kernels as defined 

in § 981.408: Provided, That this 50 

percent requirement shall not apply to 

handlers with total annual obligations of 

less than 1,000 pounds. * * * 

Dated: December 1, 2006. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 06–9545 Filed 12–1–06; 2:50 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. NM360; Special Conditions No. 

25–337–SC] 

Special Conditions: Learjet 25, 25A, 

25B, 25C, 25D, and 25F Airplanes; 

High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: The FAA issues these special 

conditions for Learjet 25, 25A, 25B, 25C, 

25D, and 25F airplanes modified by 

Envoy Aerospace, LLC. These modified 

airplanes will have novel or unusual 

design features when compared with the 

state of technology envisioned in the 

airworthiness standards for transport 

category airplanes. The modification 

consists of installing Universal Avionics 

EFI–890 Electronic Flight Displays and 

Rockwell Collins AHS–1000A Attitude 

Heading Reference Systems. The 

applicable airworthiness regulations do 

not contain adequate or appropriate 

safety standards for protecting these 

systems from effects of high-intensity 

radiated fields (HIRF). These special 

conditions contain the additional safety 

standards that the Administrator 

considers necessary to establish a level 

of safety equivalent to that established 

by the existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: The effective date for these 

special conditions is November 13, 

2006. We must receive your comments 

on or before January 5, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may mail or deliver 

comments on these special conditions 

in duplicate to: Federal Aviation 

Administration, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Attention: Rules Docket 

(ANM–113), Docket No. NM360, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356. You must mark your 

comments Docket No. NM360. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg 

Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight Crew 

Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2799; 

facsimile (425) 227–1320. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

The FAA has determined that notice 

and opportunity for prior public 

comment for these special conditions is 

impracticable, because these procedures 

would significantly delay certification 

and delivery of the affected aircraft. In 

addition, the substance of these special 

conditions has been subject to the 

public comment process in several prior 

instances with no substantive comments 

received. We therefore find that good 

cause exists for making these special 

conditions effective upon issuance. 

However, we invite interested persons 

to take part in this rulemaking by 

submitting written comments. The most 

helpful comments reference a specific 

portion of the special conditions, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES