alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of RTI International Metals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lawrence W. Jacobs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:

          (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

November 9, 2004

      /s/ LAWRENCE W. JACOBS
--------------------------------------
          Lawrence W. Jacobs
       Chief Financial Officer

     * This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
       1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
       any other purpose.
Presidential Documents

67029 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 222 

Friday, November 17, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of November 14, 2006 

Assignment of Reporting Function Under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 

Memorandum for the Director of National Intelligence 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

the reporting function of the President under section 1016(e) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108– 

458, 118 Stat. 3638) is hereby assigned to the Director of National Intelligence 

(Director). 

The Director shall perform such function in a manner consistent with the 

President’s constitutional authority to withhold information the disclosure 

of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative 

processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive’s constitutional duties. 

Any reference in this memorandum to the provision of any Act shall be 

deemed to include references to any hereafter-enacted provision of law 

that is the same or substantially the same as such provision. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

[FR Doc. 06–9304 

Filed 11–16–06; 11:52 am] 

Billing code 3910–A7–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRO0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Silver Bell Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  June 5, 2007Signed:"Kelly Fielder"Name:Kelly FielderTitle:President, CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1652 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1652

To require institutions receiving certain assistance from the Troubled 
  Asset Relief Program or the Federal Reserve to have employee bonus 
     payment plans approved in advance of the payments being made.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

  Mr. Murphy of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require institutions receiving certain assistance from the Troubled 
  Asset Relief Program or the Federal Reserve to have employee bonus 
     payment plans approved in advance of the payments being made.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMPLOYEE BONUS PAYMENT LIMITATIONS.

    (a) TARP Limitations.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall require 
that any institution that receives, directly or indirectly, financial 
assistance under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 
2008 (12 U.S.C. 5211 et seq.) after the date of the enactment of this 
Act shall only make employee bonus payments if such payments are 
included in an employee bonus payment plan that has been approved by 
the Secretary of the Treasury.
    (b) Limitations on Certain Assistance From the Federal Reserve.--
The Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 
shall require that any institution that receives, directly or 
indirectly, financial assistance authorized by the Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System under the third undesignated paragraph of 
section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 343) after the date of 
the enactment of this Act shall only make employee bonus payments if 
such payments are included in an employee bonus payment plan that has 
been approved by the Secretary of the Treasury.
    (c) Employee Bonus Payment Defined.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall define the term ``employee bonus payment'' for the purposes of 
this Act, except such term shall include, at a minimum, retention 
compensation and incentive compensation.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 229
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 42

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition 
   Service relating to ``Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to 
     Program Discrimination Complaint Processing--Policy Update''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Risch, Mrs. 
  Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Wicker, Ms. Ernst, 
 Mrs. Britt, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Vance, Mr. Lee, Mr. Scott of 
   Florida, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

                            October 17, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition 
   Service relating to ``Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to 
     Program Discrimination Complaint Processing--Policy Update''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service relating to 
``Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination 
Complaint Processing--Policy Update'' (issued May 5, 2022, as a 
memorandum, and a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability 
Office dated June 5, 2023, printed in the Congressional record on June 
7, 2023, on pages S1998-S2000, concluding that such memorandum is a 
rule under the Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 229

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition 
   Service relating to ``Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to 
     Program Discrimination Complaint Processing--Policy Update''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 17, 2023

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal
Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




January
      21, 2009
                  
                  /s/ Daniel
      B. O’BrienDaniel
      B. O’BrienPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Lands for the Purpose of Opening Decatur Street in the Borough of Brooklyn; Frank B. Walker, Appellant. John Schauf et al., Respondents.

(Submitted November 22, 1909;

decided November 30, 1909.)

Motion for re-argument denied, witli ten dollars costs. (See 196 N. Y. 286.)
#### Frank P. Davey et al., appellees, v. A. B. Curry et al., appellants.

Filed April 17, 1914.

No. 17,605.

Appeal: Soppiciency op Evidence. The evidence considered in the light of the circumstances shown, and *held*sufficient to sustain the judgment.

Appeal from the district court for Dixon county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Kingsbury & Hendrickson,*for appellants.

*J. J. McCarthy, contra.*

*42Fawcett, J.

The controversy between the parties to this action is substantially this: Plaintiffs sold to defendant A. B. Flurry the north half of the southwest quarter and-the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 2, township 30, range 5, in Dixon county, containing 120 acres, “more or less, according to government survey,’5-for $6,500. When the time came to conclude the transaction, some question arose as to a strip 7% feet wide and 80 feet long, along the north side of the tract, over which it was thought that one William Millie claimed a right of way or easement as an outlet from his farm to the public highway. Defendants claim that plaintiffs were to either obtain a quitclaim deed for this strip or have the claim for right of way set aside by a court proceeding on the ground of nonuse by Millie. Defendant Ourry retained $1,500 of the agreed purchase price of the land as a guarantee that plaintiffs would carry out this agreement. Plaintiffs did not obtain a quitclaim deed, nor have Millie’s right canceled by any court proceeding, and brought suit to collect the $1,500 which defendants had. retained. Defendants filed an answer and cross-petition in which they claimed damages, by reason of nonperformance by plaintiffs of their oral agreement, in the sum of $1,500. There was a trial to the district court without the intervention of a jury. The trial court found there was due to plaintiffs on their contract of sale the sum of $1,679.37; that there was due to defendant, by reason of the easement above referred to, the sum of $100, and entered judgment for plaintiffs for the balance of $1,579.37’. Defendants appeal.

The only error assigned and argued in the brief is that “the damages allowed by the court are inadequate.” We have examined the record and are unable to sustain this contention. On the contrary, we think the evidence is sufficient,- when considered in the light of the circumstances shown, to sustain the judgment. It is therefore

Affirmed.

Barnes, Rose and Sedgwick, JJ., not sitting.
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–700 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1053] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1053, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of September 29, 2006. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Personalized 
Healthcare Workgroup

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the first meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.)

DATES: January 4, 2007 from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., EST.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. (You will need a photo ID to enter a 
Federal building.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/workgroups.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At this inaugural meeting, the Workgroup 
members will be introduced and will introduced and will begin 
discussion of the charges to the group on making recommendations to the 
American Health Information Community.
    The meeting will be available via internet access. Go to http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/workgroups.html for additional information on 
the meeting.

    Dated: December 14, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-9803 Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
**Exhibit 31**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR10 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

Date:  March 15, 2007

 

  /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann_________Name:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 21   Filed 01/30/17   Page 1 of 1
§ 2554.2 What kind of conduct will result in program fraud enforcement? ( a ) Any person who makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim or written statement to the Corporation is subject to program fraud enforcement. A “person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity.
( b ) If more than one person makes a false claim or statement, each person is liable for a civil penalty. If more than one person makes a false claim which has induced the Corporation to make payment, an assessment is imposed against each person. The liability of each such person to pay the assessment is joint and several, that is, each is responsible for the entire amount.
( c ) No proof of specific intent to defraud is required to establish liability under this part.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**


**TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      David
      Rector, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nano
      Holdings International, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
      31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Nano Holdings International, Inc.





Dated:
      April 2, 2007





By:
      /s/ David Rector


David
      Rector


Chief
      Executive Officer,


Chief
      Financial Officer, and


Principal
      Accounting Officer
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Achievement TestsCitizenship EducationCivicsElementary Secondary EducationGrade 12Grade 4Grade 8National Competency TestsNorm Referenced TestsSocial StudiesStandardized TestsStudent Evaluation

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 156.350 Eligibility and enrollment standards for Qualified Health Plan issuers on State-based Exchanges on the Federal platform. ( a ) In order to participate in a State-based Exchange on the Federal platform, a QHP issuer must comply with HHS regulations, and guidance pertaining to issuer eligibility and enrollment functions as if the issuer were an issuer of a QHP on a Federally-facilitated Exchange. These requirements include— ( 1 ) Section 156.285(a)(4)(ii) regarding the premiums for plans offered on the SHOP, for plan years beginning prior to January 1, 2018;
( 2 ) Section 156.285(c)(5) and (c)(8)(iii) regarding the enrollment process for SHOP, for plan years beginning prior to January 1, 2018; and
( 3 ) Section 156.715 regarding compliance reviews of QHP issuers, to the extent relating directly to applicable eligibility and enrollment functions.
( 4 ) Section 156.265(d) of this subchapter regarding binder payments and premium payment deadlines.
( b ) HHS will permit issuers of QHPs in each State-based Exchange on the Federal platform to directly enroll applicants in a manner that is considered to be through the Exchange, as if the issuers were issuers of QHPs on Federally-facilitated Exchanges under § 156.1230(a), to the extent permitted by applicable State law.
( c ) If the State-based Exchange on the Federal platform does not substantially enforce a requirement in paragraph (a) of this section against the issuer or plan, then HHS may do so, in accordance with the enforcement remedies in subpart I of this part, subject to the administrative review process in subpart J of this part.
[81 FR 12351, Mar. 8, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 94181, Dec. 22, 2016; 83 FR 17069, Apr. 17, 2018]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2004

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business Inc. ("Issuer")
for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

     a).  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b).  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

     This Certification is executed as of May 12, 2004.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                                       /s/ Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       33