alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 August 18,2011 

MEMORANDUM 

To: The Commission 

Through: Alec Palmer 

StaffDirector 

From: PatriciaCarmona "^(^ 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Acting Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Alex Boniewicz^|ri 

Audit ManagerO/ 

By: Marty Kuest^fe^^ 

Lead Auditor 

Subject: Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Democratic Party of 

Orange County (A09-12) 

Pursuant to Commission Directive No. 70 (FEC Directive on Processing Audit Reports), 

the Audit staffs recommendations are presented below and the findings are discussed in 

the attached Draft Final Audit Report. The Office of General Counsel has reviewed this 

memorandum and concurs with the recommendations. 

Finding 1. Misstatement of Financial Activity 

The Audit staff recommends that the Commission find that Democratic Party of 

Orange County misstated their financial activity for calendar years 2007 and 2008. 

Finding 2. Untimely Deposit of Receipts 

The Audit staff recommends that the Commission find that Democratic Party of 

Orange County failed to deposit timely, contributions from individuals. 

The Committee did not request an audit hearing. 

If this memorandum is approved, a Proposed Final Audit Report will be prepared within 

30 days of the Commission's vote. 
Should an objection be received, Directive No. 70 states that the Audit Division 

Recommendation Memorandum will be placed on the next regularly scheduled open 

session agenda. 

Documents related to this audit report can be viewed in the Voting Ballot Matters folder. 

Should you have any questions, please contact Marty Kuest or Alex Boniewicz at 694-

1200. 

Attachment: 

- Draft Final Audit Report on the Democratic Party of Orange County 

cc: Office of General Counsel
JOHN 

### L. RICHARDSON, 

### P.L.L.C. 2700 CALVERT STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D . C. 20008 (202) 371-2258 (202) 667-2539 (FAX) JRICHARDSON@JOHNLRICHARDSON.COM

August 8, 2011 Ms. Dorothy Beard Director Office of Information Services U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S .E. Washington D.C. 20590 Re: Docket OST-2011-0083
- Amerijet International, Inc. Dear Ms. Beard: We have completed the polling on behalf of Amerijet International, Inc. in connection with its August 5, 2011 application for an extension of startup date. Please note that, in addition to the parties on the certificate of service, we have also served a copy of Amerijet's application on the following individuals: Courtney Felts (for FedEx), Peter Beckett (for Polar); Steve Morrissey (for United); and Daniel Weiss (for Continental). No party has objected to approval of the application. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions . Respectfully submitted,

~ ~RiChardson

Counsel for Amerijet International, Inc. cc: Mr. Brett Kruger
§ 2554.13 How does a defendant respond to the complaint? ( a ) A defendant may file an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer will be considered a request for an oral hearing.
( b ) In the answer, a defendant— ( 1 ) Must admit or deny each of the allegations of liability contained in the complaint (a failure to deny an allegation is considered an admission);
( 2 ) Must state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why he or she believes the penalties, assessments, or both should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Must state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer which meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the defendant may file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability, requesting a hearing, and requesting an extension of time in which to file a complete answer. A general answer must be filed within 30 days of service of the complaint.
( d ) If the defendant initially files a general answer requesting an extension of time, the reviewing official must promptly file with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer, and the request for an extension of time.
( e ) For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. Such answer must be filed with the ALJ and a copy must be served on the reviewing official.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

MEMORANDUM MAY042016 

TO; 

FROM: 

Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Adav Noti ¥ 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

inseT 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Couns 

Compliance Advice 

Joshua Blume 

Attomey 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on the Oklahoma Leadership Council (LRA 1011) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report ("DFAR") 

on the Oklahoma Leadership Council ("the Committee")- We concur with the findings in the 

DFAR: Misstatement of Financial Activity (Finding 1); Misstatement of Financial Activity -

Levin Fund (Finding 2); Recordkeeping for Employees (Finding 3); and Contributions from 

Unregistered Political Organizations (Finding 4). If you have any questions, please contact Joshua 

Blume, the attomey assigned to this audit.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2013-0670; Dir ID 2013-NM-081-AD
§ 2400.57 Termination of stipend. ( a ) The Foundation may suspend or terminate the payment of a stipend if a Fellow fails to meet the criteria set forth in § 2400.40 through § 2400.44 and § 2400.60, except as provided for in § 2400.61. Before it suspends or terminates a fellowship under these circumstances, the Foundation will give notice to the Fellow, as well as the opportunity to be heard with respect to the grounds for suspension or termination.
( b ) The Foundation will normally suspend the payment of a stipend if a Fellow has more than one grade of “Incomplete” in courses for which the Foundation has made payment to the Fellow.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 12th meeting of the American Health Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

January 18, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. (Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.)

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​cc_​main.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue discussing secure messaging.

                    The meeting will be available via internet access. For additional information, go to                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​cc_​instruct.html.*

Dated: December 14, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-9806 Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00550-CV

The Harris County Appraisal Review Board

v.

Cyngita Properties Inc

On Appeal from the

269th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-79583

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 29, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Media Marketing
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ronald Altbach, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Ronald Altbach
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Ronald Altbach
                                            Chief Executive Officer


November 14,  2002
No. 2321.

#### Chilis Banks *v.*The State.

1. Murder—Indictment is sufficient to charge a murder by express malice aforethought, and, therefore, murder of the first degree, if it charges that the accused “did, with malice aforethought, kill the deceased [naming him] by shooting him with a pistol.”

2. Practice in the Court oe Appeals—Statement oe Pacts—Bill oe Exceptions.—In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, this court is called upon to review the record on appeal only with reference to the sufficiency of the indictment and the correctness of the charge of the court.

Appeal from the District Court of Chambers. Tried below before the Hon. E. Hobby.

The death penalty was assessed against the appellant in this case for the murder of Martha Henderson. The transcript brings up neither a statement of the facts proved on the trial, nor bills of exception reserved during the proceedings. -

*William Chambers,*for the appellant.

*560Opinion delivered January 28, 1888.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

For the murder of Martha Henderson, the appellant, Chilis Banks, was tried and convicted of murder of the first degree, with the death penalty awarded against him.

In arrest of the judgment, the following motion was presented and overruled: “That the indictment is fatally defective in this, that it does not charge that defendant killed and murdered Martha Henderson.” The indictment alleges that defendant “did with malice aforethought kill Martha Henderson by shooting her with a pistol.” It is the settled doctrine of this court that to allege that the killing was with “malice aforetnought,” is equivalent to alleging that the homicide was committed with express “malice aforethought.”

This being the case, this indictment in legal effect charges that defendant did, with express malice aforethought, kill Martha Henderson by shooting her with a pistol. The question raised and insisted upon by the appellant is, that it must be alleged that the accused did “murder” the deceased. We hold it sufficient in this respect if the acts, elements and intentions which compose the offense are set forth in plain and intelligible language. Hence, conclusions from the acts and intentions need not be alleged. Applying this rule to the indictment under discussion, it will be found amply sufficient. Why? Because it is impossible for a person to shoot and kill, with his express malice, a human being, and not be guilty of murder of the first degree. (Willson’s Crim. Forms, 388, and notes.)

The record contains neither a statement of the facts nor a bill of exceptions; nor have we the aid of a brief for the appellant. Then there is nothing to be revised by this court except the sufficiency of the indictment and the charge of the court. The indictment is good, and, in the absence of a statement of facts, we find no error in the charge requiring the reversal of the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
# CongressionalCandidate Table 8f

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/11/20.
From: Rich Wilcox/AA/USEPA/US

To: "Madden, Paul C" <paul.madden@rolls-royce.com>

Date: 01/24/2012 12:16 PM

Subject: Aviation NOx Rule-Production Cutoff Lead Time

Greetings Paul,

I wanted to follow-up on the lead time issue now that the FAA has described their 6-step process to 

assure that all engine models needing a formal recognition of compliance with the proposed Tier 6 NOx 

standards based on previously generated test data will receive such an acknowledgement by January 1, 

2013. Have you heard about this and does it address any concerns you may have had? Can you support 

implementing the cutoff date as we proposed and as EASA is also doing? 

We would be happy to discuss this further, if needed.

Please remember that this email and any response will be submitted to the rulemaking docket.

Rich
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

PURSUING AMERICA’S GREATNESS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 15-cv-1217 (TSC)

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER

Consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion (ECF No. 56), Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 50) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further 

ORDERED that plaintiffs are AWARDED fees in the amount of $194,379.89 and costs and 

expenses in the amount of $6,168.85. 

Date: June 1, 2020

Tanya S. Chutkan 

TANYA S. CHUTKAN

Case 1:15-cv-01217-TSC Document 57 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:22-cv-01976-JEB Document 19 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-01976-JEB 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

 Defendant. 

Notice is hereby given that Campaign Legal Center, plaintiff in the above-captioned case, 

appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from this Court’s 

Order and Memorandum Opinion entered December 8, 2022 (ECF Nos. 17, 18), granting 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and dismissing this case without prejudice. 

Dated: December 21, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Megan P. McAllen 

Megan P. McAllen (DC Bar No. 1020509) 

mmcallen@campaignlegalcenter.org 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 

1101 14th St. NW, Suite 400 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

(202) 736-2200 

Attorney for Plaintiff 
 

 

 

Case 1:22-cv-01976-JEB Document 19 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 21, 2022, I caused a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document to be served upon all counsel of record registered with the Court’s ECF 

system, by electronic service via the Court’s ECF transmission facilities. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Megan P. McAllen 

Megan P. McAllen (DC Bar No. 1020509) 

mmcallen@campaignlegalcenter.org 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 

1101 14th St. NW, Suite 400 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

(202) 736-2200 

Attorney for Plaintiff
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,456
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   225
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    255,108
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        727,448
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,043,906
<DEPOSITS>                                     580,435
<SHORT-TERM>                                   261,564
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,225
<LONG-TERM>                                     50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,043,906
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,442
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,559
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,001
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,466
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,479
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,522
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,743
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,743
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,894
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .213
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .213
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.72
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,597
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,150
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      105
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,353
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,353
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Order filed, December 21, 2017

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00708

- CV

____________ FORUM US, INC. , Appellant

V.
JEFFREY MUSSELWHITE, AUDIE ROMERO, ANTELO PE OIL TOOL & MFG. CO., LLC, INTER VALE CAPITAL, LLC, H KM C ONSULTING, LLC

AND WEARSOX, L.P. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 60075



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 27, 2017

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has no t received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Tammy Adams , the substitute court reporter, to file t he record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 6, 2010  |   | By:    | /s/  Neil K. Warma                                                                                      |
|                       |   |   | Neil K. WarmaPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Acting Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 20463 

March 23, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Patricia Cannona 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Joseph F. Stoltz 

Assistant StaffDirector 

Christopher Hugfhey 

Acting General Counsel' 

Lawrence L. Calvert, 

Associate General Coununs£^ s ^ 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

For Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Jennifer Waldman i^^MA^ 

Paralegal 

Interim Audit Report on Ohio Republican Party State Central & Executive 

Committee (LRA #828) 

The Ofiice of General Counsel has reviewed the Interim Audit Report on the Ohio 

Republican Party State Central & Executive Committee. We concur with the finding in the 

Proposed Report (Finding 1 - Reporting of Debts and Obligations). If you have any questions, 

please contact Jennifer Waldman, the paralegal assigned to this audit.
PUBLIC LAW 109–254—AUG. 1, 2006 120 STAT. 657

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3549:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Oct. 18, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): July 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–254

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 210 West

3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘William F. Clinger, Jr. Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

210 West 3rd Avenue in Warren, Pennsylvania, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘William F. Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

F. Clinger, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 1, 2006.

Aug. 1, 2006

[H.R. 3549]