alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Chris I. Roberts,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1to the annual report on Form 20-F of Amcor Limited;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

 

3.               The company’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15(d)-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)                                  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; and

 

(b)                                 Evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

 

4.               The company’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors:

 

(a)                                  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)                                 Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 26,2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Chris I.  Roberts                             |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Chris I. Roberts  Title: Executive Chairman |

 

----
FILED IN COURT OFAPPEALS 12th CourtcM' Appea!s-D?strict CATHY S. LUSK OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 2/11/2015 

## MOORE, DAVINA WILSON Tr. Ct. No. 007-1663-11 

## On this day, the Appellant's motionfor rehearing has been denied. FILE COPY

PD-1045-14 

### Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 

### TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350), the undersigned, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 9th day of November  2007.   HOUSE OF TAYLOR JEWELRY, INC.  /s/   Jack Abramov ----------------------------- Name: Jack Abramov Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### § 2551.113 What financial obligation does CNCS incur for non-CNCS funded projects?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542, Aug. 30, 2024.

Issuance of an NGA to a sponsor of a non-CNCS funded project does not create a financial obligation on the part of CNCS for any costs associated with the project.

[83 FR 64648, Dec. 17, 2018]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Flexible Solutions International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 13, 2004        /s/ DAN O'BRIEN

                              Dan O'Brien
                              Title: Chief Executive Officer, Director
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigned's knowledge,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

Dated:
July 13, 2009

/s/ DR. JOHN COUSTAS Dr. John Coustas President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 75227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project, Malheur National Forest, 
Grant County, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA

ACTION: Cancellation Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2006, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Thorn Salvage Recovery 
Project on the Blue Mountain Ranger District of the Malheur National 
Forest, was published in the Federal Register (71 FR 71120). Forest 
Service has decided to cancel the preparation of this EIS. The NOI is 
hereby rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Hensley, Project Manager, 
Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John 
Day, Oregon, telephone 541-575-3167, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d575558534e5158447d5b4e135b585913484e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7adafa2a9b4aba2be87a1b4e9a1a2a3e9b2b4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 8, 2006.
Gary L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9687 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Original,

No. 5337.

#### Petition of Gennaro Piccoli.

Filed January 26, 1965.

Submitted March 3, 1965.

Decided April 30, 1965.

*Gennaro*Piccoli, pro se.

*William*Maynard, Attorney General and *George S. Pappagianis,*Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and supporting memorandum both signed by the petitioner under date of January 26, 1965, were filed as an original proceeding in this court on January 26, 1965. The petition named the Warden of the State Prison and the State Parole Officer as parties defendant. The petitioner was originally sentenced to State Prison following conviction of murder in the second degree, and was later sentenced for escape. He has been paroled since September 1960, and is now at liberty in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, under the supervision of Massachusetts parole authorities pursuant to RSA 607:52.

On February 2, 1965 the petitioner, and his counsel in Massachusetts were notified that by special assignment the petition would be in order for oral argument at 10 A.M. on March 2, 1965, and that any brief or memorandum should be filed by February 24, 1965..

By March 2, 1965, no brief or memorandum had been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Neither petitioner nor his counsel appeared for argument on that date. Accordingly the case was taken as submitted. A telephone request on behalf of counsel for the petitioner made on March 2, 1965, seeking a new assignment for argument at a special date not in the regular hearing session was denied. However permission was granted to file a brief or memorandum within a week. None was hied. Under *279date of March 10, 1965 counsel were requested by letter of the clerk to inform the court whether any brief or memorandum would be filed. To this inquiry no reply was received.

On this state of the record, in the absence of brief or oral argument on behalf of the petitioner, the petition is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

*Petition dismissed.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A OF GOLDLEAF FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006**

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):

|   | (a)    | fully   complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and                                          |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (b)    | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

          This Certification is executed as of March 28, 2007.

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|   | /s/ G. Lynn   Boggs       |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | G. Lynn   Boggs           |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer |
Hillsborough,

No. 5515.

#### State *v.*Edward H. Coolidge, Jr.

Argued December 20, 1968.

Decided June 30, 1969.

*Alexander f. Kalinski,*special counsel (by brief and orally), for the State.

*Matthias J. Reynolds, fohn A. Graf,*and *Robert L. Chiesa*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

In this jurisdiction, the authority of the Attorney General to enter a *nolle prosequi*in advance of trial is firmly *427established. *State*v. *Swift,*101 N. H. 340, 343; *State*v. *Lavallee,*104 N. H. 443, 446. Nor is it restricted by statute or rule of court. *State*v. *Smith,*49 N. H. 155. Cf. Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 48 (a).

*Klopfer*v. *North*Carolina, 386 U. S. 213, relied upon by the defendant in support of its “motion to dismiss notwithstanding the nol pross,” requires no different conclusion. The entry in that case of *“nolle prosequi*with leave,” under the North Carolina practice did not operate to discharge the indictment, but permitted it to be reinstated upon the prosecutor’s application. Hence the pendency of the indictment was held to deny the petitioner in the case the right to speedy trial guaranteed by the Constitution. *Id.,*222. See also, *Commonwealth*v. *Gant,*213 Pa. Super. 427.

Under our practice, the entry of *nolle prosequi*operated to discharge the indictment, so that the case is no longer pending, as the Trial Court correctly ruled. See *Lewis*v. *United States,*216 U. S. 611; *Parr*v. *United States,*351 U. S. 513, 517. Other issues briefed by the defendant thus require no consideration.

*Exceptions overruled.*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1601 

To require the Secretary of Defense to require members of the Armed Forces, 

before being deployed, to be trained in management of contracts and 

contractors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2009 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to require members 

of the Armed Forces, before being deployed, to be trained 

in management of contracts and contractors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRAINING OF DEPLOYED MEMBERS OF THE 

4 ARMED FORCES IN MANAGEMENT OF CON5 TRACTS AND CONTRACTORS. 

6 (a) TRAINING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of De7 fense shall require that, before the deployment of any 

8 member of the Armed Forces, the member shall be proVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:57 Mar 19, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1601.IH H1601

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1601 IH

1 vided training in the management of defense contracts and 

2 contractors. 

3 (b) MATTERS COVERED IN TRAINING.— 

4 (1) BASIC OVERVIEW.—The training required 

5 under subsection (a) shall provide a basic overview 

6 and shall include, at a minimum, briefing on the fol7 lowing: 

8 (A) Applicable rules under the Federal Ac9 quisition Regulation, Department of Defense 

10 Directive 5000.1, and special provisions allow11 able for expedited needs. 

12 (B) Rules of ethical conduct in interactions 

13 with contractors and in oversight of their per14 formance in the field. 

15 (C) Policies regarding conflicts of interests, 

16 bribery, fraud, and mismanagement. 

17 (2) ADDITIONAL TRAINING FOR CERTAIN MEM18 BERS.—The training required under subsection (a) 

19 shall provide additional training for members of the 

20 Armed Forces with direct responsibility for decisions 

21 regarding contracting, including— 

22 (A) fundamental cost analysis principles; 

23 and 

24 (B) training tools for developing and evalu25 ating alternative proposals, including contract 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1601 IH

1 manuals, and simple E-business tools like sam2 ple documents, statements of work, and cost 

3 comparisons. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

I, John McMahon, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Lease Limited (the ‘‘Company’’), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December  31,  2006 (the ‘‘Report’’), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: April  2,  2007

/s/ John McMahon                                                                John McMahonChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerGenesis Lease Limited

----
Exhibit 10.4


 





PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$655,000	Sonoma County, California



May 28, 2020


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
the undersigned, 1847 Asien Inc., a Delaware corporation having a mailing address at 1801 Piner Road, Santa Rosa, California 94501
(the “Maker”), unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Joerg Christian Wilhelmsen and Susan Kay Wilhelmsen,
as Trustees of the Wilhelmsen Family Trust, U/D/T dated May 1, 1992 (the “Lender”), the principal sum of Six
Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand Dollars ($655,000), at an interest rate of one percent (1%) computed on the basis of a 360 day year.
The Maker further agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the Lender or by any
other holder of this Note in any action to collect this Note, whether or not suit is brought.


 


Principal and accrued interest
shall be payable 24 hours AFTER WRITTEN DEMAND.


 


Maker shall have the right
at any time to prepay, in whole or in part, the principal without penalty, subject to the qualification, however, that no partial
prepayment of the original sum shall in any way release, discharge or affect the obligation of the Maker to make full payment in
the amount of the balance of said principal sum plus accrued interest thereon at the time of demand.


 


The amounts due hereunder
are payable in lawful money of the United States of America to the Lender at is address as specified above or at such other place
as the holder of this Note shall from time to time designate, in immediately available funds.


 


No failure on the part
of the Lender or any other holder of this Note to exercise and no delay in exercising any right, remedy or power hereunder or under
any other document or agreement executed in connection herewith shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial
exercise by the Lender or any other holder of this Note of any right, remedy or power hereunder preclude any other or future exercise
of any other right, remedy or power.


 


This Note shall be binding
upon the Maker and the Maker’s successors and assigns.


 


This Note is executed and
delivered in the State of New York and is to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 


In the event that any one
or more of the provisions of this Note shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in whole or in part,
or in any respect, or in the event that any one or more of the provisions of this Note shall operate, or would prospectively operate,
to invalidate this Note, then, and in any such event, such provision or provisions only shall be deemed null and void and of no
force or effect and shall not affect any other provision of this Note, and the remaining provisions of this Note shall remain operative
and in full force and effect, shall be valid, legal and enforceable, and shall in no way be affected, prejudiced or disturbed thereby.


 





	 	1847 ASIEN INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Robert Patterson
	 	Name: 	Robert Patterson
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
§ 101.74 Violations, penalties, and remedies. ( a ) Willful violation of the provisions of the DPA, and related statutes (when applicable), this part, or an official action, is a crime and upon conviction, a person may be punished by fine or imprisonment, or both. The maximum penalties provided by the DPA are a $10,000 fine, or one year in prison, or both.
( b ) The Government may also seek an injunction from a court of appropriate jurisdiction to prohibit the continuance of any violation of, or to enforce compliance with, the DPA, this part, or an official action.
( c ) In order to secure the effective enforcement of the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, and official actions, the following are prohibited: ( 1 ) No person may solicit, influence, or permit another person to perform any act prohibited by, or to omit any act required by, the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action.
( 2 ) No person may conspire or act in concert with any other person to perform any act prohibited by, or to omit any act required by, the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action.
( 3 ) No person shall deliver any item if the person knows or has reason to believe that the item will be accepted, redelivered, held, or used in violation of the DPA and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action. In such instances, the person must immediately notify HHS that, in accordance with this provision, delivery has not been made.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 170 appear at 80 FR 62755, Oct. 16, 2015.

#### § 170.500 Basis and scope.

This subpart implements section 3001(c)(5) of the Public Health Service Act and sets forth the rules and procedures related to the ONC Health IT Certification Program for health information technology (health IT) administered by the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[76 FR 1325, Dec. 7, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 54291, Sept. 4, 2012]