alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2556.130 What is the procedure for denial or reduction of VISTA assistance to an existing VISTA project? ( a ) AmeriCorps will notify the sponsor in writing, at least 75 calendar days before the anticipated denial or reduction of VISTA assistance, that AmeriCorps proposes to deny or reduce VISTA assistance. AmeriCorps' written notice will state the reasons for the decision to deny or reduce assistance and will provide an opportunity period for the sponsor to respond to the merits of the proposed decision. AmeriCorps retains sole authority to make the final determination as to whether the VISTA assistance at issue will be denied or reduced, as appropriate.
( b ) Where AmeriCorps' notice of proposed decision is based upon a specific charge of the sponsor's failure to comply with the applicable term(s) or condition(s) of a contract, grant agreement, or an applicable Memorandum of Agreement, the notice will offer the sponsor an opportunity period to respond in writing to the notice, with any affidavits or other supporting documentation, and to request an informal hearing before a mutually agreed-upon impartial hearing officer. The authority of such a hearing officer will be limited to conducting the hearing and offering recommendations to AmeriCorps. Regardless of whether or not an informal hearing takes place, AmeriCorps will retain full authority to make the final determination as to whether the VISTA assistance is denied or reduced, as appropriate.
( c ) If the recipient requests an informal hearing, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, such hearing will be held on a date specified by AmeriCorps and held at a location convenient to the sponsor.
( d ) If AmeriCorps' proposed decision is based on ineffective management of resources, or on the substantial failure to comply with AmeriCorps policy and overall objectives under a contract, grant agreement, or an applicable Memorandum of Agreement, AmeriCorps will inform the sponsor in the notice of proposed decision of the opportunity to show cause why VISTA assistance should not be denied or reduced, as appropriate. AmeriCorps retains full authority to make the final determination whether the VISTA assistance at issue will be denied or reduced, as appropriate.
( e ) The recipient will be informed of AmeriCorps' final determination on whether the VISTA assistance at issue is denied or reduced, and the basis for the determination.
( f ) The procedure in this section does not apply to a denial or reduction of VISTA assistance based on legislative requirements, availability of funding, or on general policy.
2550 M street NW 

UP Washington, DC 20037 

202-457-6000 

Facsimile 202-457-6315 

www.pattonl)ogg8.oom 

October 23. 2012 \JWIIiamJ. McGinlcy 

' 202-457-6561 

wmcginIey@pattonbogg9.co1n 

VIA E-MAIL 

Tom Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: Audit of Randy Hultgren for Congress 

Dear Mr. Hintermister: 

Tliis responds to Audit Division's Interim Audit Report ("lAR") on behalf of our client, Randy 

Hultgren for Congress ("RHC"), in the above-referenced matter. 

In response to the Federal Election Commission's audit of the 2010 election cycle, RHC initiated 

a comprehensive review of its receipts and disbursements at its own expense. RHC performed 

this review in an effort to ensure that it need only file one set of amendments to correct any 

issues itemized in the lAR and any other possible issues. As a result of this undertaking, RHC 

prepared amendments to its 2010 and 2012 election cycle periodic FEC reports. The amended 

reports were filed on October 3,2012. 

The lAR contains one fmding concerning the alleged misstatement of financial aedvity and 

recommends that RHC file amended reports. The lAR also teconmiends that RHC amend its 

most recendy filed report to correct the cash-on-hand balance with an explanation that the 

change is the result of an audit adjustment. RHC filed the recommended amended reports on 

October 3,2012, as discussed aSove, and the amendments to its 2012 election cycle FEC 

periodic reports addressed RHC's current cash-on-hand. 

Please note that as a result of the comprehensive nature of RHC's review, the 2010 election cycle 

amended periodic reports are inconsistent with the figures cited in the lAR. If necessary, we are 

happy to discuss this data and where it differs from the lAR with the audit staff. 

Abu Dhabi | Anchorage | Dalias | Denver | Doha | New Jersey | New Yori( | Riyadh | Washington DC 
ur 

Mr. Tom Hintermister 

October 23,2012 

Page 2 

Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. 

Respectfully subpHitted, 

c 

[. McGioney 

Glenn M. Willard 

Counsel to Rafidy HuUffvn for Conffvss 

cc: Kendrick Smith 

Audit Supervisor
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Current Report of Mobile Reach International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 8K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Joyce, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                            /s/  Charles Joyce
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Charles Joyce
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


                                            December 15th, 2004
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Dr. John Coustas, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Company and have;



5.     The
Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors
and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
July 13, 2009

|                                                                            |  |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ DR. JOHN COUSTAS Dr. John Coustas President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
1 

## Pathways II **Rule Phone**  **& E -**  **Mail Log**  Includes substantive telephone conversations and e - mails between EPA personnel and non

-government stakeholders following signature of the Pathways II Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on June 14, 2013 (s eparate memos on additional calls/emails have also been docketed individually). **Date EPA**  **P e**  **rsonnel Stakeholder**  **Purpose of Call /** **E -**  **mail and Topic**  **s(s) D**  **iscussed** November 2013

– January 2014 Lauren Rafelski

(AAAS Fellow) Jeffrey Fedenko, University

of Florida Several emails about Fedenko’s 2013 paper about grasses grown for

bioenergy in Florida
1/6/2014 Lauren Rafelski

(AAAS Fellow) Jack Comstock, USDA Phone call to discuss different t ypes of energy cane 1/24/2014 Lauren Rafelski

(AAAS Fellow) Anna Hale, USDA Email about methods of measuring the fiber content of energy cane 1/26/2014 Lauren Rafelski

(AAAS Fellow) Jack Comstock, USDA Email about methods of measuring the fiber content of energy cane 4/28/2014 Lauren Rafelski

(AAAS Fellow) Paul White, USDA Email about cellulosic content of energy cane November 2013

– January 2014 David Babson

(AAAS Fellow) Cy nthia Finley , National Association of Clean Water Agencies Several emails and informal phone calls regarding data characterizing the solids conte nt of municipal wastewater January 2014

– March 2014 David Babson

(AAAS Fellow) John Willis, Brown and

Caldwell Several emails and informal phone calls regarding data characterizing the solids content and treatment of municipal wastewater at facilities producing biogas2
#### Paine v. McCarthy, appellant.

*Practice—time for appearing and answering—summons without service of*

*complaint.*

On the 12th day of June, the defendant was served with a summons neither accompanied by, nor required to be accompanied by a complaint. The defendant having served no appearance or answer before the 8th of July, the plaintiff entered judgment. The defendant claimed that the judgment should be set aside, as irregular, on the ground that the plaintiff served a complaint at defendant’s office on the 19th of June, and the defendant’s time to appear and answer did not expire until the 9th of July, on which day he served an answer. The judge below denied defendant’s motion, but gave him liberty, on certain conditions, to come in and defend. *Held,*that the order was correct. Section 180 of the Code expressly shows that, to entitle the defendant to a copy of the complaint, he should appear within the twenty days after service of the summons, and that the complaint need not accompany the summons. This construction has been given by the court. *Van Pelt*v. *Boyer,*7 How. 825.

Appeal from an. order of special term on an action by Joseph E. Paine against Edward D. McCarthy.

*Edward D. McCarthy,*appellant in person.

*James E. Bedell,*for respondent.

Donohue, J.

The head-note contains the entire opinion.

*Order affirmed.*
#### E. G. and S. C. Greene *v.*James McDonald, E. A. Sowles and O. A. Burton.

May Term, 1900.

Present: Tart, C. J., Rowell, Tyler, Start, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed May 16, 1900.

*Appeal from, chancery decree-*— -Acts *1898, No. 95, sec. 6 and V. S. 981*— See opinion.

Chancery. Heard at the September Term, 1899, Eranklin County, before *Munson,*Chancellor. Decree for the orators. *259The decree was filed January 16,1900, and a motion for an appeal was filed on behalf of the defendants, February 10, 1900.

The allowance of the appeal was filed April 16, 1900.

In the Supreme Court the orators moved to dismiss the appeal.

*Alfred A. Hall*for the orators.

*E. A. Bowles*for the defendants.

Per Curiam.

A motion for an appeal from a vacation decree must be filed within twenty days from the time the decretal order is filed with the clerk, sec. 6, No. 35, Acts 1898, and^at the term in which the decree is made. Sec. 981, Y. S.

*Case dismissed.*
OSHA 3215-04N-05
EXECUTIVE. CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMERYL. FRAZIER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

Date of Calendar 

report No. 

1965 

June 29 2 

Aug. 3 3 

Date of Calendar 

report No. 

1966 

June 24 847 

24 848 

24 849 

Treaty No. 

' 

Bx LARRY .M. WHEELER, ._ExECUTIVE CLERK 

Monday, .:rune 27, 1966 

TREATIES 

Subject ... 

Ex. H (86th Cong., Hague Protocol to Warsaw Convention--'- ~ 

1st sess.) '· 

Ex. D (88th Cong., Consular Convention With .. the Soviet ; 

2d sess.). .Union. 

NOMINATIONS 

Message No. · Name of nominee Otll.ce 

DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE 

161 Henry E. Stebbins, of Mas- Ambassador Extraordinary 

sachusetts, a Foreign and Plenipotentiary .. of 

Service officer of the the United States of 

class of career minister. America to Uganda. 

210 John H. Crimmins, of Ambassador Extraordinary 

Maryland, a Foreign and Plenipotentiary of 

Service officer of class 1. the United . States of 

America to the Dominican Republic. 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 

214 Rosel H. Hyde, of Idaho ___ A member of the Federal 

Communications Commission for the unexpired 

·· ·- term of 7 years from July 

1, 1962. 

Action or committee 

Reported favorably by 

Mr. Fulbright from 

the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a. printe!l report. 

(See Ex. Rep't. No. 3, 

89th Cong., ~st sees.) 

Reported favor bly by 

Mr. ·Fulbright from 

the Committ!)e on 

Foreign Relations, 

with a Print£l!i report. 

(See Ex. Rept. No. 4, 

89th Cong.,. 1\lt seas.) 

Minority views filed 

Aug,. 5, 1965. (See 

Ex. Rept. No.4, p. 2, 

89th: Cong., let seas.) .. . ~-- ----

Predecessor 

.. 
2 

-· ...... -. - ······- ·· . ._ .... - ·-·-. 

Date of Calendar Message Name of nominee Office Predecessor 

report No. No. 

--.--

I ··. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS-

. . SlON~Continued 

1966 

June 24 850 219 Nicholas Johnson, oflowa __ A member of the .Federal 

Communications Commission for a term of 7 

years from July 1, 1966. 

DEPARTMENT OF 

·1USTICE 

:,.' '' 

24 851 190 William W. Justice, of . U.S. attorney for the . Reappointment . Texas. eastern· district of Texas 

for the term of 4 years. 

24 852 188 Louis C. LaCour, of U.S. attorney fop the Do. 

Louisiana. eastern district of Louisiana for the term of 4 , years. 

24 853 189 Ernest Morgan, of Texas ___ U.S. attorney for the west- Do. ern district of Texas for 

term of 4 years. 

24 854 179 Marion Mathias Hale, of U.S. marshal for the Do. 

Texas. southern district of 

Texas for the term of 4 

years. 

24 855 •180 Robert I. Nash, of Texas •• _ U.S. marshal for the north- Do. 

ern district of Texas for 

24 856 . 181 ·Tully Reynolds, of Texas ___ the term of 4 years. 

U.S. marshal for the east~ Do. 

ern district of Texas for 

the term of. 4 years. 

. ~ . • ' ~ ' • - • . J 

U. l. IOV!RM'ME'tiT ?tHNTIMG OFF1C:E: "1il'l
The Ho norable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2315

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Frank Terrasas, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 30, 1998 Filed: January 6, 1999

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Frank Terra sas was charged with conspiring to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Terrasas appeals the judgment of the district court, entered upon 1 the jury & s verdict finding him guilt y of the charge. After a careful review of the record, weconclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, was sufficient to support Terrasas & s conviction. See United States v. McCracken , 110 F.3d 535, 540 (8th Cir. 1997); United States v. Cunningham , 83 F.3d 218, 222 (8th Cir.-2-

1996) ( standard of review); United States v. Johnson , 12 F.3d 827, 831-32 (8th Cir
. 1994), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1095 (1994). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Norman Hirsch <nhirsch@nha.com>

Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 1:54 PM

To: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Subject: FW: two questions

Attachments: Certificate-of-Status.pdf; EIN-FLAERIALS.pdf

resent

From: Norman Hirsch [mailto:nhirsch@nha.com] 

Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 3:49 PM 

To: 'nia.daniels@faa.gov' 

Subject: two questions 

Hi Ms. Daniels:

I’m Norman Hirsch and I have a section 333 exemption petition 2015‐0108 and I understand you are the analyst for my

petition.

I have two questions that I hope you can help with.   

1. General ballpark of how long it will take to review and approve?    I believe mine was posted on Regulations.Gov

on Jan 16.   

2. Since sending the petition, I have formed a small LLC and registered it with the State of Florida and obtained the

IRS document so I’m setup with:  Florida Aerials, LLC as a small business (see attached).    The question I have for

you is whether I should update this information into my petition or let it continue as is and maybe do it later?   I

don’t want to delay the approval if I can do it later.   I was just thinking that if this business grows and I needed

to hire another pilot to work with me, then perhaps I should register under the LLC rather than what it is now

just my name:  Norman Hirsch.   Your suggestions/thoughts on this would be appreciated.    If I can amend this

later, and/or if it will delay the existing petition, then I’d like to leave it as is.   If you believe it is a good idea to

amend it now and it won’t throw me back to the end of the line waiting for approval, then I will send the

documents in using the appropriate format or procedure that is required.  If that is the case, please advise

where to find instructions on how to do this if the attached are not sufficient.

Thanks very much!

Best regards

‐‐Norman Hirsch

--- 

Florida Aerials, LLC 

422 Coral Cove Dr. 

Juno Beach, FL 33408 

561-827-3337
§ 205.170 State standards for office space, equipment, and facilities. State plan requirements: A State plan for financial assistance under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI(AABD) of the Social Security Act must provide that: ( a ) The State agency will establish and maintain standards for office space, equipment, and facilities that will adequately and effectively meet program and staff needs. Under this requirement, offices must be well marked and clearly identifiable in the community as a public service.
( b ) The State agency will assure that the standards are continuously in effect in all State and local offices or agencies, including agency suboffices, and special centers through: ( 1 ) Making information about the standards available to State and local staff and other appropriate persons;
( 2 ) Regular planned evaluation of housing and facilities by regularly assigned staff through visits, reports, controls and other necessary methods;
( 3 ) Methods for enforcement when necessary to secure compliance with State standards.
[36 FR 3862, Feb. 27, 1971, as amended at 45 FR 56686, Aug. 25, 1980]
#### § 4.6 Materials related to petitions under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3, service of the Secretary's copies of petitions for compensation under the VICP and of related filings, by mail, shall be served upon the Director, Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Office of Special Programs, Health Resources and Services Administration 5600 Fishers Lane, Parklawn Building, Room 16C-17, Rockville, Maryland 20857, or in person, shall be served upon the Director, Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Office of Special Programs, Health Resources and Services Administration, 4350 East West Highway, 10th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

[67 FR 78990, Dec. 27, 2002]
# National African American History Month, 2006

As we celebrate National African American History Month, we recognize the many contributions of African Americans to our country and reinforce our commitment to be a Nation of opportunity and hope for every citizen.

Throughout our history, African Americans have courageously worn our Nation's uniform while defending peace and liberty around the globe. Patriots like Thurgood Marshall and Rosa Parks broke down racial barriers and inspired our Nation to make good on the promise of equal justice under law. Educators like Mary McLeod Bethune and Dr. Frederick Patterson transformed the academic world, with the goal of ensuring that every child has access to a good education. Athletes such as Jesse Owens and Wilma Rudolph and entertainers such as Ossie Davis and Ray Charles have brought pride and joy to generations of Americans. Today, the accomplishments of African Americans in every aspect of our society continue to encourage people to reach as far as their vision and dreams may take them.

African-American organizations have played a vital role in achieving justice and equal rights, and they have helped make communities across our country stronger and better. This year's theme of African American History Month, “Celebrating Community: A Tribute to Black Fraternal, Social, and Civic Institutions,” recognizes the African-American groups that have worked to confront injustices and expand opportunities. These organizations believe in the potential and worth of every person, and they have worked to help all Americans receive a quality education, to feed the hungry and house the homeless, to encourage youth to make healthy choices, and to reach out to others in need. By answering the call to love a neighbor as we would like to be loved ourselves, these groups have set a positive example, and we continue to be inspired by their compassion and service to others.

Working together, Federal, State, and local government, community organizations, and individual citizens will continue to foster hope and build a better tomorrow for all our children and grandchildren.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 2006 as National African American History Month. I call upon public officials, educators, and all the people of the United States to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities that honor the significant contributions African Americans have made to our Nation.                          ( print page 5156)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-seventh day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 06-991

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 265.5 May States use sampling? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 53877 , June 28, 2024.
( a ) Each State may report the disaggregated data in the TANF Data Report and the SSP-MOE Data Report on all recipient families or on a sample of families selected through the use of a scientifically acceptable sampling method that we have approved. States may use sampling to generate certain aggregated data elements as identified in the instructions to the reports. States may not use sampling to report expenditure data.
( b ) “Scientifically acceptable sampling method” means: ( 1 ) A probability sampling method in which every sampling unit in the population has a known, non-zero chance to be included in the sample; and
( 2 ) Our sample size requirements are met.
( c ) In reporting data based on sampling, the State must follow the specifications and procedures in the TANF Sampling Manual.