alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 74490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Patent Application Concerning Ballistic Impact 
Detection System

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.4, 404.6 and 404.7, announcement 
is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in 
PCT/US2005/021195 entitled ``Ballistic Impact Detection System,'' filed 
June 16, 2005. The United States Government, as represented by the 
Secretary of the Army, has U.S. and foreign rights in this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-ZA-J, 504 Scott Street, Fort 
Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, 
Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664. For patient 
issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808, both at 
telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A wearable ballistic impact protection 
system detects impacts to a body. The system includes multiple sensors 
for detecting vibration. The sensed vibrations are converted to 
electrical signals which are filtered. Electronic components are 
provided to determine whether the filtered signals have frequency and 
amplitude characteristics of impact that cause injury to a body. 
Preferably, the sensors are Piezo-electric film sensing elements. 
Information regarding the extent of the impact and injuries to the body 
may be transmitted to a remote location so that medics or other 
personnel may be informed to the extent of injuries to the body so that 
they may provide medical assistance.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-9635 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
II 

Calendar No. 199 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1516 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MARCUS MATHES POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 37926 Church Street in Dade 

6 City, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser7 geant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1516 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus 

5 Mathes Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 199 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1516 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMathes Post Office’’. Dade City, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus al Service located at 37926 Church Street in 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

                  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-146034 on Forms S-8 of our report dated April 14, 2008
relating to our audit of the financial statements of Smoky Market Foods, Inc.
for the period ended December 31, 2007, which appear in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Smoky Market Foods, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.



/s/ Jaspers + Hall, PC
----------------------------------------
Jaspers + Hall, PC

Denver, Colorado
April 15, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Atlas Energy Resources, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MATTHEW A. JONES   
|Matthew A. Jones       
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 26, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 10 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 10

  Memorializing the unborn by lowering the United States flag to half-
              staff on the 22nd day of January each year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

  Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Daines, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. 
 Mullin, and Mrs. Blackburn) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Memorializing the unborn by lowering the United States flag to half-
              staff on the 22nd day of January each year.

Whereas, on January 22, 1973, the majority of the members of the Supreme Court 
        of the United States ruled that abortion was a right secured by the 
        Constitution of the United States;
Whereas, on June 24, 2022, the majority of the members of the Supreme Court of 
        the United States overturned Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), to affirm 
        that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to 
        abortion; and
Whereas, since January 22, 1973, more than 60,000,000 unborn children have 
        perished: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the recognition of the Day of Tears in the 
        United States on the 22nd day of January each year;
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to lower 
        their flags to half-staff to mourn and honor the innocents who 
        have lost their lives to abortion; and
            (3) encourages legislators to enact laws that respect the 
        sanctity of life.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 697 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to modify the treatment of revenue 

from timber sale contracts and certain payments made by counties to 

the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior under 

good neighbor agreements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Mr. RISCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to modify the treatment of revenue from timber sale contracts and certain 

payments made by counties to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior under good 

neighbor agreements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treating Tribes and 

5 Counties as Good Neighbors Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 697 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE TREATMENT OF CERTAIN 

2 REVENUE AND PAYMENTS UNDER GOOD 

3 NEIGHBOR AGREEMENTS. 

4 (a) GOOD NEIGHBOR AUTHORITY.—Section 8206 of 

5 the Agricultural Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 2113a) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(6), by striking ‘‘or Indian 

8 tribe’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ‘‘, 

11 Indian tribe,’’ after ‘‘Governor’’; 

12 (B) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking clause 

13 (i) and inserting the following: 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Funds received 

15 from the sale of timber by a Governor, an 

16 Indian tribe, or a county under a good 

17 neighbor agreement shall be retained and 

18 used by the Governor, Indian tribe, or 

19 county, as applicable— 

20 ‘‘(I) to carry out authorized res21 toration services under the good 

22 neighbor agreement; and 

23 ‘‘(II) if there are funds remain24 ing after carrying out subclause (I), 

25 to carry out authorized restoration 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 697 IS

1 services under other good neighbor 

2 agreements.’’; 

3 (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, In4 dian tribe,’’ after ‘‘Governor’’; and 

5 (D) by striking paragraph (4). 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 8206(a) 

7 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 2113a(a)) is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ‘‘, Indian 

10 tribe,’’ after ‘‘Governor’’; and 

11 (2) in paragraph (5), by inserting ‘‘, Indian 

12 tribe,’’ after ‘‘Governor’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this Act apply to any project initiated pursuant to a good 

15 neighbor agreement (as defined in section 8206(a) of the 

16 Agricultural Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 2113a(a)))— 

17 (1) before the date of enactment of this Act, if 

18 the project was initiated after the date of enactment 

19 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (Public 

20 Law 115–334; 132 Stat. 4490); or 

21 (2) on or after the date of enactment of this 

22 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 2522.610 What is the difference in performance measurements requirements for competitive and formula programs? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, State commissions are responsible for making the final determination of performance measures for State formula programs, while the Corporation makes the final determination for all other programs.
( b ) The Corporation may, through the State commission, require that formula programs meet certain national performance measures above and beyond what the State commission has individually negotiated with its formula grantees.
( c ) While State commissions must hold their sub-grantees responsible for their performance measures, a State commission, as a grantee, is responsible to the Corporation for its formula programs' performance measures.
[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,403
<INVENTORY>                                     37,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,324
<PP&E>                                           8,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,321
<BONDS>                                         89,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           42,849
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (78,542)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,837
<SALES>                                        177,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,578
<CGS>                                          121,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   328
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,520
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2372

MARVA CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROPER ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-02559-DCN)

Submitted: May 29, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019

Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marva Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marva Campbell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to her former employer on her 

employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we deny Campbell’s motion for the preparation of transcripts at 

government expense* and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. 

Roper St. Francis Healthcare, No. 2:16-cv-02559-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2018). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * There are no transcripts to prepare because the district court did not hold any 

hearings.
August 20 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t o

f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w JerseyAvenue , S E Wastiingto n D.C . Dea rSecretar

y LaHood ; Thi s lette ri s sen t t o yo u i n suppor t o f th e proposa l of Charle s M . Schulz-Sonom a Count yAirpor t (SIS ) locate d i n Santa Rosa , Californi a fo ra gran t unde rth e Smal l Communit yAi rService Developmen t Progra m fo r2010 . Th e Charle s M . Schulz-Sonom a Count yAirpor t receive d a Smal l Communit ygran t i n 2004 an d use d thi s gran t alon g wit h loca l fund s t o offeet ou rstar t u p cos t an d develo p a loca l advertisin g an d marketin g program . We bega n servic e i n Marc h 200 7 at STS an d th e respons e exceede d ou r expectations . Th e market has bee n ver y successful , I n par

t du e t o th e excellen t marketin g suppor t that we receive d fro m th e loca l Sonom a Count yCommunity . Horizo n Ai rcurrentl y provide s nonsto p ai r service fro m th e Charle s M . Schulz-Sonom a Count yAirpor t t o Los Angeles , Las Vegas , Portlan d an d Seattl e wit h 76 sea

t Q-40 0 aircraft . Whil e th e loca l market ha s bee n ver y successful , th e market i s imbalance d an d we' d like t o attrac t mor e inboun d passenger

s t o hel p boost traffi c an d grow again . Th e Sonom a Count yAirpor t an d it s marketin g partner

s hav e com e t o u s an d offere d t o develo p a marketin g progra m t o produce mor e Inboun d passenger

s t o th e Sonom a Count

y market . Thi s wil l b e ver ybeneficia l fo rHorizo n Air , bu t mos t importantly , fo rth e loca l communit y an d we suppor

t th e airport' s applicatio n Wit h th e Departmen t o

f Transportatio n assistance throug h a gran t t o Charle s M . Schulz-Sonom a Count y Airport , Horizo n Ai rlook s forvtfar d t o servin g mor

e passengers , th e possibilit yof expandin g th e numbe rof flight s i n existin g markets , an d addin g flight s t o ne w markets . Pleas e contac t m e i f yo u hav

e an y question s concernin g thi s lette rof suppor t b y Horizo n Air .

Sincerel y yours , / ' . ... . J l • ' "l - t Da n Russ o Vice Presiden t of Marketin g an d Communication s Horizo n Ai r — < 

### s = T i • .'NJ 

### c n e n 'P•=^^ r4^35 m

. —•—v-'* ^ *->•* • ^ ^ ^ 

# §o O

--- ' G O

||..ii,.. rV . • R(l . 11. , l.-' i • N . .r.'. l , V . A ' Small Communit

y Aii ' Servic e Deselopmen t Progra mPag e 2 1 Charle s M . Schulz-Sonom aCount y Aiipor t Proposa l
§ 1614.6 Procedure. ( a ) The recipient shall develop a plan and budget to meet the requirements of this part which shall be incorporated as a part of the refunding application or initial grant application. The budget shall be modified as necessary to fulfill this part. That plan shall take into consideration: ( 1 ) The legal needs of eligible clients in the geographical area served by the recipient and the relative importance of those needs consistent with the priorities established pursuant to section 1007(a)(2)(C) of the Legal Services Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 2996f(a)(2)(C)) and 45 CFR part 1620 adopted pursuant thereto;
( 2 ) The delivery mechanisms potentially available to provide the opportunity for private attorneys, law students, law graduates, or other professionals to meet the established priority legal needs of eligible clients in an economical and effective manner; and
( 3 ) The results of the consultation as required below.
( b ) The recipient shall consult with significant segments of the client community, private attorneys, and bar associations, including minority and women's bar associations, in the recipient's service area in the development of its annual plan to provide for the involvement of private attorneys, law students, law graduates, or other professionals in the provision of legal information and legal assistance to eligible clients and shall document that each year its proposed annual plan has been presented to all local bar associations within the recipient's service area and shall summarize their response.
( c ) In the case of recipients whose service areas are adjacent, coterminous, or overlapping, the recipients may enter into joint efforts to involve private attorneys, law students, law graduates, or other professionals in the delivery of legal information and legal assistance to eligible clients, subject to the prior approval of LSC. In order to be approved, the joint venture plan must meet the following conditions: ( 1 ) The recipients involved in the joint venture must plan to expend at least twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of the aggregate of their basic field awards on PAI. In the case of recipients with adjacent service areas, twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of each recipient's grant shall be expended to PAI; provided, however, that such expenditure is subject to waiver under this section;
( 2 ) Each recipient in the joint venture must be a bona fide participant in the activities undertaken by the joint venture; and
( 3 ) The joint PAI venture must provide an opportunity for involving private attorneys, law students, law graduates, or other professionals throughout the entire joint service area(s).
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Energy Resources, LLC (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Jones,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                      Matthew A. JonesMatthew
                      A. Jones
                    Chief
                      Financial Officer
                    March
                      27, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy VIII, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy VIII, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:  March 31, 2011 |                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/   Michael J. Mauceli                                                                                                                                                    |
|                       | Michael   J. Mauceli                                                                                                                                                        |
|                       | Manager   and Member of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC, the general partner of   Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the Managing General Partner of the   Partnership |
|                       | (P*rincipal Executive Officer*)                                                                                                                                             |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----