alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2553.71 What is the process for application and award of a grant? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
As funds become available, CNCS solicits application for RSVP grants from eligible organizations through a competitive process. ( a ) *What are the application requirements for an RSVP grant?* An applicant must: ( 1 ) Submit required information determined by CNCS.
( 2 ) Demonstrate compliance with any applicable requirements specified in the Notice of Funding Availability or Notice of Funding Opportunity.
( b ) *What process does the Corporation use to select new RSVP grantees?* ( 1 ) CNCS reviews and determines the merits of an application by its responsiveness to published guidelines and to the overall purpose and objectives of the program. In conducting its review during the competitive process, CNCS considers the input and opinions of those serving on a peer review panel, including members with expertise in senior service and aging, and may conduct site inspections, as appropriate.
( 2 ) The selection process includes: ( i ) Determining whether an application complies with the application requirements, such as deadlines, eligibility, and programmatic requirements, including performance measurement requirements;
( ii ) Applying published selection criteria, as stated in the applicable Notice of Funding Availability or Notice of Funding Opportunity, to assess the quality of the application;
( iii ) Applying any applicable priorities or preferences, as stated in the applicable Notice of Funding Availability or Notice of Funding Opportunity;
( iv ) Ensuring innovation and geographic, demographic, and programmatic diversity across CNCS RSVP grantee portfolio; and
( v ) Identifying the applications that most completely respond to the published guidelines and offer the highest probability of successfully carrying out the overall purpose and objectives of the program.
( c ) *How is a grant awarded?* ( 1 ) Subject to the availability of funds, the award will be documented by a Notice of Grant Award (NGA).
( 2 ) CNCS and the sponsoring organization are parties to the NGA. The NGA will document the sponsor's commitment to fulfill specific programmatic objectives and financial obligations. It will document the extent of CNCS' obligation to provide assistance to the sponsor.
( d ) *What happens if CNCS rejects an application?* CNCS will inform an applicant when an application is not approved for funding.
( e ) *For what period of time does CNCS award a grant?* CNCS awards an RSVP grant for a specified period that is usually three years in duration with an option for a grant renewal of three years, if the grantee's performance and compliance with grant terms and conditions are satisfactory. CNCS will terminate funding to a grantee when CNCS determines that the grant should not be renewed for an additional three year period.
[76 FR 20246, Apr. 12, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 64656, Dec. 17, 2018]
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices 75747 

[FR Doc. 06–9747 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Meeting of the Defense Department 

Advisory Committee on Women in the 

Services (DACOWITS) 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a), 

Public Law 92–463, as amended, notice 

is hereby given of a forthcoming 

meeting of the Defense Department 

Advisory Committee on Women in the 

Services (DACOWITS). The purpose of 

the Committee meeting is to introduce 

new members and conduct orientation 

training. The meeting is open to the 

public, subject to the availability of 

space. 

Interested persons may submit a 

written statement for consideration by 

the Committee and make an oral 

presentation of such. Persons desiring to 

make an oral presentation or submit a 

written statement to the Committee 

must notify the point of contact listed 

below no later than 5 p.m., 29 December 

2006. Oral presentations by members of 

the public will be permitted only on 

Wednesday, 3 January 2007 from 4:30 

p.m. to 5 p.m. before the full Committee. 

Presentations will be limited to two 

minutes. Number of oral presentations 

to be made will depend on the number 

of requests received from members of 

the public. Each person desiring to 

make an oral presentation must provide 

the point of contact listed below with 

one (1) copy of the presentation by 5 

p.m., 29 December 2006 and bring 35 

copies of any material that is intended 

for distribution at the meeting. Persons 

submitting a written statement must 

submit 35 copies of the statement to the 

DACOWITS staff by 5 p.m. on 29 

December 2006. 

DATES: 3 January 2007 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m., 

4 January 2007, 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m., 5 

January 2007, 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m. 

Location: Double Tree Hotel Crystal 

City National Airport, 300 Army Navy 

Drive, Arlington, VA 22202. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CPT 

Arnalda Magloire, USA, DACOWITS, 

4000 Defense Pentagon, Room 2C548A, 

Washington, DC 20301–4000. 

Telephone (703) 697–2122. Fax (703) 

614–6233. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting 

agenda. 

Wednesday 3, January 2007 8:30 a.m.– 

5 p.m. 

Welcome & Administrative Remarks. 

2006 Report Review. 

Public Forum. 

Thursday 4, January 2007 8:30 a.m.–5 

p.m. 

Welcome & Administrative Remarks. 

2006 Report Review. 

Friday 5, January 2007 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m. 

Welcome & Administrative Remarks. 

2006 Report Review. 

Note: Exact order may vary. 

Dated: December 12, 2006. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, DoD. 

[FR Doc. 06–9741 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN18DE06.029</GPH>
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1125 KSIRH r N.w.

WASHINGTON.D.C. 204&3

REPORT"OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE

GET-OUT-THE-VOTE

I. .Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of the Nevada State

Democratic Central Committee Get-Out-the-Vote ("the Committee"),

undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal Election Cornnlission in accordance with the Commission's audit policy to determine

whether there has been compliance with the provisions of the

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Act").

The audit was conducted pursuant to Section 438(a) (8) of Title 2

of the United States Code which directs the Commission to make

from time to time audits and field investigations with respect

to reports and statements filed under the provisions of the Act.

The registration date of the Nevada State Democratic

Central Committee Get-Out-the-Vote was October 29, 1976. The

Committee was established by the Nevada State Democratic Central

Committee to conduct Get-Out-the-Vote activities.

The audit covered the period October 29, 1976 through

December 31, 1976, the termination date of the Committee. The

Committee reported a beginning cash balance at October 29, 1976

of $-0-, total receipts for the period of $7,4l0~00, total expenditures for the period of $7,410.00, and a closing cash balance

at December 31, 1976 of $-0-.

This audit report is based on documents and working

papers supporting each of its factual statements. They form

part of the record upon which the Commission based its decisions

on the matters in this report and were available to commissioners

and appropriate staff for review.
-2-

II. AUditor's Statement

• •.; . •

.,u.(_ ".usa _ 5 up • =;_4 ao, .0':.0 sp AX5&3- SUS iJ 1S1.'.........• .........t:'IftJ'

It is the opinion of the Audit staff, based upon examination

of the reports and statements filed and the records presented,

that the reports and statements of the Nevada State Democratic

Central Committee Get-Out-the-Vote fairly present the financial

activities of the Committee for the period covered by the audit.

No material problems in complying with the Federal Election Campaign Act were discovered during the course of the audit•

B. Key Personnel

The principal officers of the Committee were Didi Carson,

Chairperson, and Beverly Wilke, Treasurer.

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of reported receipts and expenditures and individual transactions: review of

required supporting documentation: analysis of Committee debts and

obligations: and, such other audit procedures as deemed necessary under the circumstances.

as se Cd a 5 a $< ...
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

     CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of BlueFire Ethanol Fuels, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an
exhibit (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of BlueFire Ethanol Fuels, Inc.
does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 30, 2007


                                                /s/ Christopher Scott
                                                ---------------------
                                                Christopher Scott
                                                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
§ 150.311 Responses to allegations of noncompliance. In determining whether to impose a civil money penalty, CMS reviews and considers documentation provided in any complaint or other information, as well as any additional information provided by the responsible entity to demonstrate that it has complied with PHS Act requirements. The following are examples of documentation that a potential responsible entity may submit for CMS's consideration in determining whether a civil money penalty should be assessed and the amount of any civil money penalty: ( a ) Any individual policy, group policy, certificate of insurance, application, rider, amendment, endorsement, certificate of creditable coverage, advertising material, or any other documents if those documents form the basis of a complaint or allegation of noncompliance, or the basis for the responsible entity to refute the complaint or allegation.
( b ) Any other evidence that refutes an alleged noncompliance.
( c ) Evidence that the entity did not know, and exercising due diligence could not have known, of the violation.
( d ) Documentation that the policies, certificates of insurance, or non-Federal governmental plan documents have been amended to comply with PHS Act requirements either by revision of the contracts or by the development of riders, amendments, or endorsements.
( e ) Documentation of the entity's issuance of conforming policies, certificates of insurance, plan documents, or amendments to policyholders or certificate holders before the issuance of the notice to the responsible entity or entities described in § 150.307.
( f ) Evidence documenting the development and implementation of internal policies and procedures by an issuer, or non-Federal governmental health plan or employer, to ensure compliance with PHS Act requirements. Those policies and procedures may include or consist of a voluntary compliance program. Any such program should do the following: ( 1 ) Effectively articulate and demonstrate the fundamental mission of compliance and the issuer's, or non-Federal governmental health plan's or employer's, commitment to the compliance process.
( 2 ) Include the name of the individual in the organization responsible for compliance.
( 3 ) Include an effective monitoring system to identify practices that do not comply with PHS Act requirements and to provide reasonable assurance that fraud, abuse, and systemic errors are detected in a timely manner.
( 4 ) Address procedures to improve internal policies when noncompliant practices are identified.
( g ) Evidence documenting the entity's record of previous compliance with PHS Act requirements.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 71023, Nov. 25, 2005; 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013; 86 FR 24286, May 5, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  February 1, 2006
                                        /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 2525.44 How will AmeriCorps notify the Eligible Individual or Designated Recipient of its decision on the extension request?

AmeriCorps will notify the Eligible Individual or Designated Recipient in writing if the request for an extension has been granted or denied. The notification will advise the requester of the process for appealing the denial if the requester has a good-faith basis to believe their request was erroneously denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, January 5, 2007.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9801  Filed 12-18-06; 11:32 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 2507.26 Reporting requirements. ( a ) AmeriCorps will submit to the Attorney General a statistical report on FOIA requests, processing, disposition, and appeals.
( b ) As required, the Chief FOIA Officer will submit to the Attorney General a Chief FOIA Officer Report containing a narrative description of the steps taken by the agency to support and improve FOIA compliance and transparency.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shiner International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), XueZhu Xu, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:      June 23, 2011
By:
/s/ XueZhu XuName: XueZhu XuTitle: Interim Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
****Exhibit 32.1****

 

****IMPLANTSCIENCES CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant SciencesCorporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I, Anthony Armini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1.    The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | **/s/**     Anthony  Armini |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony Armini                                       |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                              |   |
|   | February 21, 2006                               |   |
|        |                                                      |        |  |

 

1

----
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 8

CONVENED JANUARY 4, 2007

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 14 104 Carl Joseph Artman, of Colorado, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of the Interior, vice David 

Wayne Anderson. 

Feb 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Dorgan, Committee on Indian 

Affairs, without printed report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30 2005
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2005
                                         /s/FRED J. KUPEL
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### John D. Crimmins, Appellant, *v.*Carlyle Realty Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

*Grimmins*v. *Garlyle Realty*Go., 133 App. Div. 664, affirmed.

(Argued October 8, 1909;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 5,1909, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion under section 547 of the Code of Civil Procedure for judgment on the pleadings, and granted said motion.

The following question was certified : *“*Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*William F. 0 lare*for appellant.

*Lewis M. Isaacs*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Cüllen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, IJiscock and Chase, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9799]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 19, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9799 Filed 12-18-06; 11:32 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

A17-04 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Reconunendation 

Memorandum on Mike Bishop for 

Congress (MBFC) 

•CERTIFICATION 

I, Dayna C. Brown, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on May 31,2018, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum 

on Mike Bishop for Congress (MBFC), as recommended in the Memorandum 

from the Chief Compliance Ofdcer and the Audit Division dated May 23,2018. 

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted 

affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

• r Date Dayna 

a 

C. Brown 

Secretary and Clerk of die Conunission