alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                     47,047
<SECURITIES>                                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              26,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                           73,176
<PP&E>                                                                      3,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                                              3,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                             88,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      77,283
<BONDS>                                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                                    3,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                  7,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                               88,654
<SALES>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                                0
<CGS>                                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           87,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           (87,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       (87,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              (87,632)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                 .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 .02


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title by the City of New York, Respondent, to Certain Lands as a Site for the Blackwell’s Island Bridge. David Shapiro et al., Appellants.

*Matter of Oity of New York {Blackwell’s Island Bridge),*133 App. Div. 896, affirmed.

(Argued October 5, 1909;

decided October 19,1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 25, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in the above-entitled proceeding.

*D. E. Ainsworth*and *Albert I. Sire*for appellants.

*Francis E.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connolly*and *Clarence L. Barber*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                302 CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Woodworth, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report of Pulitzer Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 12, 2003


/s/ Robert C. Woodworth
-----------------------
Robert C. Woodworth
President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      -30-
§ 233.70 Blindness. ( a ) *State plan requirements.* A State plan under title X or XVI of the Social Security Act must: ( 1 ) Contain a definition of blindness in terms of ophthalmic measurement. The following definition is recommended: An individual is considered blind if he has central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with correcting glasses or a field defect in which the peripheral field has contracted to such an extent that the widest diameter of visual field subtends an angular distance of no greater than 20°.
( 2 ) Provide, in any instance in which a determination is to be made whether an individual is blind or continues to be blind as defined under the State plan, that there will be an initial examination or re-examination performed by either a physician skilled in the diseases of the eye or by an optometrist, whichever the individual so selects. ( i ) No examination is necessary when both eyes are missing.
( ii ) Where an initial eye examination or re-examination is necessary, the physician or optometrist conducting such examination will submit to the State agency a report thereof, on such forms and in such manner, as may be prescribed for such purpose. A determination whether the individual meets the State's definition of blindness under the State plan will be based upon a review of such eye examination report as provided for in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, and other information or additional examination reports as the State deems necessary.
( 3 ) Provide that each initial eye examination report and any subsequent re-examination report will be reviewed by a State reviewing physician skilled in the diseases of the eye (e.g., an ophthalmologist or an eye, ear, nose and throat specialist). Such physician is responsible for making the agency's decision that the applicant or recipient does or does not meet the State's definition of blindness, and for determining if and when reexaminations are necessary in periodic reviews of eligibility, as required in § 206.10(a)(9)(iii) of this chapter.
( b ) *Federal financial participation* — ( 1 ) *Assistance payments.* Federal financial participation is available in assistance provided to or in behalf of any otherwise eligible person who is blind under the State's title X or XVI plan. Blindness may be considered as continuing until a determination by the reviewing physician establishes the fact that the recipient's vision has improved beyond the State's definition of blindness set forth under its State title of X or XVI plan.
( 2 ) *Administrative expenses.* Federal financial participation is available in any expenditures incident to the eye examination necessary to determine whether an individual is blind.
[36 FR 3867, Feb. 27, 1971, as amended at 40 FR 25819, June 19, 1975]
ex10-c_17







EXHIBIT 10(c)(17)












Amendment Seventeen to Insurance Processing Agreement












This document is Amendment Seventeen to the Insurance Processing Agreement,
made and entered into effective June 1, 1993, and amended by Amendment One
to Insurance Processing Agreement dated June 4, 1998; Amendment Two to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated September 25, 1998; Amendment Three to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated October 19, 1998; Amendment Four to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated December 15, 1998, Amendment Five to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated March 25, 1999, Amendment Six to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated May 10, 1999, Amendment Seven to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated June 24, 1999, Amendment Eight to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated August 5, 1999, Amendment Nine to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated October 1, 1999, Amendment Ten to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated January 31, 2000, Amendment Eleven to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated March 1, 2000, Amendment Twelve to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated April 19, 2000, Amendment Thirteen to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated July 31, 2000, Amendment Fourteen to
Insurance Processing Agreement dated September 25, 2000, Amendment Fifteen
to Insurance Processing Agreement dated October 31, 2000, and Amendment
Sixteen to Insurance Processing Agreement dated November 29, 2000 (the
“Agreement”), by and between American National Insurance Company (“American
National”) a Texas corporation, and Legacy Insurance Processing Group (“LMG”), a
California corporation.











      In consideration of mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:










	2.	 	“Section 6.1” of the Agreement is hereby deleted in
      its entirety and the following new Section 6.1 shall be substituted
      therefore:












“Subject to termination as hereinafter provided, this Agreement shall remain
in force and effect until the close of business on March 31, 2001, the term
of this Agreement. This Agreement may be renewed by mutual agreement for
additional successive terms of one (1) year unless terminated by either
party by prior written notice to the other at least one hundred eighty
(180) days prior to the end of the initial term or the renewal term.”











      Except as specifically amended hereby,
all terms and provisions of the Insurance Processing Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.










IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.











	 	 	 
	LEGACY MARKETING GROUP		AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE
      COMPANY












	 	 	 
	By: /s/ H. Lynn Stafford		By: /s/ Kelly M.
  Collier
	
      

      		
      

      
	Title: Chief Information Officer		Title: Vice President
	
      

      		
      

      
	Witness: /s/ Stephanie Molteni		Witness: /s/ Jynx
Yucra
	
      

      		
      

      
	Date: January 24, 2001		Date: January 22,
    2001
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 29 , 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00035

- CR

IN RE Osvaldo Vazquez MONTANEZ

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed an emergency motion to stay the underlying proceedings pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 13, 2023. Af ter considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and the mandamus record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is

DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on January 13, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on March 29 , 2023

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of March, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10892CR , styled State of Texas v. Osvaldo Vazquez Montanez , pending in

the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
§ 286.245 What data collection and reporting requirements apply to Tribal TANF programs? ( a ) Section 412(h) of the Act makes section 411 regarding data collection and reporting applicable to Tribal TANF programs. This section of the regulations explains how we will collect the information required by section 411 of the Act and information to implement section 412(c) (work participation requirements).
( b ) Each Tribe must collect monthly and file quarterly data on individuals and families as follows: ( 1 ) Disaggregated data collection and reporting requirements in this part apply to families receiving assistance and families no longer receiving assistance under the Tribal TANF program; and
( 2 ) Aggregated data collection and reporting requirements in this part apply to families receiving, families applying for, and families no longer receiving assistance under the Tribal TANF program.
( c ) Each Tribe must file in its quarterly TANF Data Report and in the quarterly TANF Financial Report the specified data elements.
( d ) Each Tribe must also submit an annual report that contains specified information.
( e ) Each Tribe must submit the necessary reports by the specified due dates.
Martin, Michael (OST) CX T - O S T - ^0 ^ _ (>)g^ \ ^ 

From: ,. ^ nancy hyke [hykeinalaska@yahoo.com] 

;Sent:_ .^ ~ Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:55 PM 

^ o r EAS (OST) 

Cc: corriejackson@hotmail.com 

Subject: AIR SERVICE TO KAKE ALASKA 

This a letter of support for Wings of Alaska, to continue service in Kake, Alaska they are a reliable Air service, 

and the people who work there are polite and very helpful. The people of Kake would like for Wings of Alaska 

to continue to bring mail in to Kake. The air service in these small communities is very important, for many 

reasons, the mail, medical appointments, and pleasure trips, as well as business trips. We appreciate the service 

that we are given by Wings Of Alaska. 

Thank you, 

Nancy L Hyke 

SOS Value Mart • 

Kake, Alaska 99830 

907-785-6444
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1539 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add certain Armed Forces organizations that are exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(19) of the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the list of organizations eligible for 

donations of personal property through State agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add certain Armed 

Forces organizations that are exempt from taxation 

under section 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 to the list of organizations eligible for donations 

of personal property through State agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN ARMED FORCES OR4 GANIZATIONS FOR DONATIONS OF PERSONAL 

5 PROPERTY THROUGH STATE AGENCIES. 

6 Section 549(c)(3)(B) of title 40, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1539 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (viii); 

2 (2) by striking the period at the end of clause 

3 (ix) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

5 clause: 

6 ‘‘(x) An organization described in sec7 tion 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue 

8 Code of 1986 (relating to a post or organi9 zation of past or present members of the 

10 Armed Forces of the United States) and 

11 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) 

12 of such Code.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 6, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01501-CV 

COLLIN BANK, Appellant 

V. 

I-TIGE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 219-2101-2011 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint notice of dismissal of the appeal. The parties have 

informed the Court that they have settled their differences and ask that the appeal be dismissed. 

Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(2). 

131501F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

COLLIN BANK, Appellant 

No. 05-13-01501-CV V. 

I-TIGE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 

LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. 219-2101-2011. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Moseley and Evans, participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal. 

Judgment entered January 6, 2014 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1356

JOHN B. SHELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL SHAMUS; PETER CAPELLI; CALVIN HARRIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-1030)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. William Joe Hoppe, Senior

Assistant City Attorney, Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a jury verdict finding in favor of the

Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint in which he

alleged that the Defendants, who are all police officers, assaulted

him following a traffic stop and illegally searched the trunk of

his car. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the jury's verdict. Shelton v. Shamus, No.

CA-96-1030 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Montana  annual report
SuDocs Number:A 114.1/26:
Item    Number:0034-B-26    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000846714
 
2010
2011
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  October 12,  2000  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Withdrawal and Resubmission of the 

Proposed Final Audit Report on The 

Legacy Committee Political Action 

Committee (A09-22) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on July 31,2012, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on The Legacy 

Committee Political Action Committee (A09-22), as reconunended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated 

July 18,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date Shawn Woodhead Werth f 

Secretary and Clerk of the Corhmission