alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/std/BV/STDFact-Bacterial-Vaginosis.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/std/BV/STDFact-Bacterial-Vaginosis.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 13.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended
March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:          June 28, 2008/s/  Dindayal JalanName:
    Dindayal JalanTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
§ 213.25 Evidence. ( a ) *Testimony.* Testimony shall be given orally under oath or affirmation by witnesses at the hearing. Witnesses shall be available at the hearing for cross-examination by all parties.
( b ) *Stipulations and exhibits.* Two or more parties may agree to stipulations of fact. Such stipulations, or any exhibit proposed by any party, shall be exchanged at the prehearing conference or otherwise prior to the hearing if the presiding officer so requires.
( c ) *Rules of evidence.* Technical rules of evidence shall not apply to hearings conducted pursuant to this part, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to test by cross-examination shall be applied where reasonably necessary by the presiding officer. A witness may be cross-examined on any matter material to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his direct examination. The presiding officer may exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by the parties and opportunity shall be given to refute facts and arguments advanced on either side of the issues.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 1/13 /20 1 6

TO: CSAPR Update Proposal Meeting ; Docket I D : EPA

- HQ

- OAR

– 201 5

- 0 500

FROM: Jeremy Mark , EPA

SUBJECT: CSAPR Update Proposal

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the below attendees on 1/ 1 3 /201 6 to discuss the

CSAPR Update Proposal

. The proposed CSAPR Updated Proposal was proposed on December

3

, 201 5

.

ATTENDEES

Jeremy Mark, EPA

David Risley, EPA

David Misenheimer, EPA

Larry Sorrels, EPA

Vince Albanese , Fuel Tech, Inc

Kevin Dougherty

, Fuel Tech , Inc
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)                The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Glenn D. BolducGlenn
      D. BolducChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      June 12, 2009










This
certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, James A. Morlan, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViewSonic Corporation;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e))for the registrantand have:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date:                     | August 16, 2004 |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| /s/ James A. Morlan       |                 |
| James A. Morlan           |                 |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |                 |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Alison Davidson, (the registrant's principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), certify that:





|   |                                                                                
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Remark Holdings, Inc., and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: April 30, 2019





By/s/ Alison DavidsonAlison DavidsonInterim Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIAM JAMES MCFADDEN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2023

- 2166

[ July 31 , 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Jeffrey Hendriks , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2022

- CT

002265A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed. See Guzman v. State , 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), rev. denied , No. SC2022

- 1597 , 2023 WL 3830251 (Fla. June 6, 2023), cert. denied No. 23

- 5173 , 2024 WL 2709435 (U.S. May 28, 2024).

W ARNER , C IKLIN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
120 STAT. 656 PUBLIC LAW 109–253—AUG. 1, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3440:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Mar. 28, considered and passed House.

July 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–253

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 100 Avenida

RL Rodrı ́guez in Bayamo ́n, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Dr. Jose ́ Celso Barbosa Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

100 Avenida RL Rodrı ́guez in Bayamo ́n, Puerto Rico, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Jose ́ Celso Barbosa Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Jose ́

Celso Barbosa Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 1, 2006.

Aug. 1, 2006

[H.R. 3440]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1595 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2009 

Mr. LEE of New York (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. 

MAFFEI, Mr. MASSA, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

TONKO, Mr. HALL of New York, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. RANGEL, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MCMAHON, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. WEINER, Mr. NADLER of New York, Mr. 

CROWLEY, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mrs. MCCARTHY

of New York, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. ISRAEL, and Mr. BISHOP of 

New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIAN K. SCHRAMM POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1595 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian 

2 K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 1025 LT Case No. 2019

- CA

- 001708

- A

_____________________________
D WIGHT L ARRY A DAMS , J R

. and M ASHA B. A DAMS , Appellant s ,

v.

E PIC S HORES AT C OLEE C OVE P ROPERTY O WNERS A SSOCIATION , I NC ., J OHN D AY , D ONALD G ULLION , and S HANNON L. M C K INNON , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County

. Howard M. Maltz , Judge

. William S. Graessle, of William S. Graessle, P

. A

. , Jacksonville, for Appellant s

. Nicholas Martino, of McCabe & Ronsman, Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellee, Epic Shores at Colee Cove Property Owner s Association, Inc.

William F . Cobb
, Christopher M. Cobb and Summer L. Reed
, of Cobb & Gonzalez, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee , John Day

. No Appearance for Remaining Appellees
, Donald Gullion and Shannon L. McKinnon

.2 February 6, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , W ALLIS , and P RATT , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
##### 



Exhibit 12(ii)
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Qimonda AG;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Dr. Michael MajerusDr. Michael MajerusMember of the Management Board
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009
(the Report) of North American Energy Partners Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.        The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 9, 2009



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ Peter R. Dodd                                 
|Name: Peter R. Dodd Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 111 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 111

   Recognizing the importance of maple syrup production to Maine and 
         designating March 26, 2023, as ``Maine Maple Sunday''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2023

    Mr. King (for himself and Ms. Collins) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the importance of maple syrup production to Maine and 
         designating March 26, 2023, as ``Maine Maple Sunday''.

Whereas the art of making sugar and syrup from the sap of the maple tree (also 
        known as acer saccharinum) was developed by Native Americans of the 
        Northeastern United States;
Whereas the production of maple syrup in Maine has a seasonal window between 
        January and May, which is when temperatures drop below freezing at night 
        and rise above freezing during the day;
Whereas Maine accounts for 17 percent of United States production of maple syrup 
        and is the third largest producer among the States;
Whereas Maine maple syrup producers make more than 575,000 gallons of syrup 
        annually, generating more than $27,000,000 for the Maine economy;
Whereas maple syrup production in Maine supports more than 560 full-time and 
        part-time jobs that generate more than $17,300,000 in wages;
Whereas Maine Maple Sunday has been observed for 40 years, with more than 100 
        sugarhouses participating from Aroostook to York County, Maine, and 
        attracting thousands of visitors annually;
Whereas Maine Maple Sunday is always observed the fourth Sunday in March; and
Whereas on March 26, 2023, Maine maple syrup producers will host the 40th annual 
        Maine Maple Sunday: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 26, 2023, as ``Maine Maple Sunday''; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the contribution and importance of maple 
        syrup producers and their families in the State of Maine.
                                 <all>
```
#### William J. Purdy, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

(Submitted May 31, 1909;

decided June 8, 1909.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollar’s costs. (See 193 N. Y. 521.)
Exhibit 4.41
 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
 th
  Vedanta Aluminium Limited
  Sterlite Industries (I) Limited
  1. Deletion of clause:
 Clause no 4 relating to Redemption Date shall stands deleted
 2. Replacement of existing Clause 5 Option to Convert with the following Clause 4:
 4.Subscribers Option to Convert:i) The subscriber shall have an option to convert the debenture in part or in full of
shares at such premium, as may be decided based on the fair value by any Merchant Banker/
any other expert agency in the field, at any time from the date of allotment either in full
or in part. Such option shall be exercised within a period of 5 (five) years from the date
of allotment, unless extended once for an additional period of 5 (five) years solely at the
request of the holder. On the expiry of the said period, or extended period, the debentures
shall be converted to shares as if the subscriber had provided the required notice and
exercised the option to convert.ii) Conversion Notice: The Subscriber shall be required to give 7 days clear notice in
writing to the Company for exercise of the Call option. The Company shall however be within
its right to waive the specified period and agree for shorter notice.




---



##### 



3
   For VEDANTA ALUMINIUM LTD.
    
    
    For STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LTD./s/ Virendra Agarwal
    
    /s/ P.L. Chockalingam
    
    /s/ Sushil Gupta
    
    /s/ B. Anand(Virendra Agarwal)
    
    (P.L. Chockalingam)
    
    (Sushil Gupta)
    
    (B. Anand)Authorised Signatories
    
    Authorised SignatoriesWitness:
    
    /s/ Girish S. Agarwal
    
    /s/ L.N. TandonGirish S. Agarwal
    
    L.N. Tandon