alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Record of Communication

Subject: NIST Cost Containment Procedures for Cylinder Analysis

On October 30, 2009, Frank Guenther of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

(NIST) responded to an inquiry from John Schakenbach of the Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) regarding NIST procedures to keep cylinder analysis cost as low as possible.

The NIST cost containment strategy is:

1) Receipt of a batch of cylinders all within the same predefined concentration range allows us to 

setup instrumentation and form a calibration curves more efficiently. This has been arraigned in 

the past through the contractor and works very well. Also. scheduling batches of cylinders to 

arrive when NIST is ready for them will allow NIST to more efficiently schedule their resources.

2) The cross interactions of the analytical species on the instrumentation we use has been 

modeled well already. Future work can make use of that modeling, where we only need to 

confirm the correction factors are still good before using them.

3) NIST has agreed to analyze these cylinders to 0.5 % uncertainty (1 % expanded uncertainty). 

The reason for this uncertainty goal is to allow reasonable certainty when judging a audit 

cylinder with 2 % expanded uncertainty. No reasonable cost gains will be achieved by

increasing our uncertainty to 1 % (2% expanded).

4) Since our uncertainty requirements are relatively high (1 % expanded), we can use 

intermediate standards for all of this work. This keeps the cost down, because our high value 

primary standards do not have to be used. In addition NIST has invested in tri-mix working 

standards that will allow us to validate our methods much quicker.

5) In the future we will be working on a FTIR method that may allow us to further reduce costs 

by consolidating all analytical work to an automated instrument.

6) High concentration audit cylinders will always cost less to analyze. The lowest concentration 

audit cylinders will cost NIST approximately 25 % more to analyze.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Request for Commission Directive 69 

Guidance involving the Democratic State 

Central Committee of California 

LRA 819 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Wertii, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Cominission, do hereby certify that on May 11,2011, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to approve as the best practice, either the two-check method or 

one allocable check with specific deposit instructions to recipients, as 

recommended in the Memorandum to fhe Commission dated April 22,2011. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Waltiier, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

^AA II ^ij ^iJu^miJuLlJji)MU 

C \ Dafe Shawn Woodhead Wertii ( 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
SITE DE VILL AROCHE

R o n d

- P oi nt R e n é R a v au d

- R é a u

7 75 5 0 MO IS S Y C R A MA Y E L

- F r an c e T él . : + 3 3 ( 0) 1 60 59 7 1 2 3 F a x : + 3 3 (0 ) 1 6 0 5 9 7 1 36

SNEC M A

10 ALLEE DU BREVENT CE 1420 COURCOURONNES

91019 EVRY CEDEX

– Tél (33) 01 69 87 09 00 www.snecma.com Villaroche August 1 6 th

, 2010

Ref: YEN

- DB

- 2505 /10

Attention : Docket Operations, M

- 30

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12

- 140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington DC 20590

- 0001

REFERE NCE : Docket No. FAA

- 2010

- 0636

SUBJECT : Request for extension of comment period of NPRM 10

- 10

Snecma is requesting an extension to the comment period for the NPRM 10

- 10, Airplane and Engine Certification Requirements in Supercooled Large Drop, Mixed P hase, and Ice Crystal Icing Conditions”, in accordance with CFR §11.47.

The proposed rule NPRM is based on ice crystal physical phenomenon, for which the current state of

the art relative to the understanding of its impact on turbine engines is not enough matu re. We consider that there is a critical and sensitive relationship between the proposed rule and the associated guidance material ( unpublished draft AC 20

- 147), and that depending of the contents of this guidance, it may be not possible to comply with the proposed engine regulation.

In addition, considering the thickness of the proposed rule documents, as well as their complexity, the review requires the coordination of many expertises within our company, in a summer time period where most of the people are absent due to the annual holidays.

Finally, the published comment period is currently just over 60 days, ending on August 30 th , 2010, while the comment period for NPRMs has typically been 90 days for proposed rule of lesser significance and complexity

.

In light of the above concerns, we kindly request the availability of the draft AC 20

- 147 to complete simultaneously the review of the AC with the proposed rule changes. We also find this comment period

insufficient and are kindly ask ing for an extensi on t o the comment period of 60 days to complete

reviews by end of October 2010.

Sincerely,

Dominique BOUVIER Head of Snecma Airworthiness Department
ChadHeywDod 

<chad.heywood@azgop.org> To "GHache@fec.gov" <ghache@fec.gov>, Timothy Lee > 

<85122cg@gmail.com>, 

05/29/201310:15PM <» ' 

Subject RE: Committee response to Draft Final Audit Report 

Gary, 

My apologies that you did not hear from our treasurer. We had thought he had been 

responding directly with you. We have learned today that he has been in the hospital. 

The Arizona Republican party accepts the findings In the audit report and has completed the 

recommended changes; we waive the hearing opportunity. Thank you for your attention in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

ChadHeywood 

Executive Director 

Arizona Republican Party 

3501N. 24*^ Street ( Phoenix, AZ 85016 

(602) 957-7770 ( chad.heywood@azgop.org
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1597 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 

for Members of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2009 

Mr. MATHESON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay 

adjustments for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 31) is repealed. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is amended— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1597 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 

2 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

3 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

4 and 

5 (3) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

6 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as pro7 vided by law’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

9 on December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 1336.69 Reporting requirements: Responsibilities of the Loan Administrator. ( a ) The Loan Administrator will maintain the following internal information and records: ( 1 ) For each borrower: The loan repayment schedule, log of telephone calls and site visits made with the date and the items discussed, correspondence with the borrower, progress reports and analyses.
( 2 ) Monthly status of all outstanding loans, noting all overdue payments.
( 3 ) Monthly status of the investments of the revolving loan fund monies not currently used for loans.
( 4 ) Monthly records on the revenue generated by the loan fund from interest charges and late charges.
( 5 ) Monthly administrative costs of the management of the loan fund and the sources of the monies to support the administrative costs.
( b ) The Loan Administrator must submit a quarterly report to the Commissioner. The report may be in a format of the choice of the Loan Administrator as long as it includes at a minimum the following topics: ( 1 ) For each borrower: ( i ) Name of the borrower;
( ii ) Economic development purpose(s) of the loan;
( iii ) Financing of the loan by source;
( iv ) Loan status (current/delinquent/paid);
( v ) Principal and interest outstanding; and
( vi ) Amount delinquent/defaulted, if any.
( 2 ) Financial status of the RLF: ( i ) Administrative cost expenditures;
( ii ) Level of base capital;
( iii ) Level of current capital;
( iv ) Amount of ANA funding;
( v ) Matching share;
( vi ) Other direct funding of the RLF;
( vii ) Program income, including interest on loans, earnings from investments, fee charges;
( viii ) Loans made;
( ix ) Losses on loans;
( x ) Principal and interest outstanding;
( xi ) Loans repaid;
( xii ) Delinquent loans; and
( xiii ) Collateral position of the RLF (the value of collateral as a percent of the outstanding balance on direct loans).
( c ) The Loan Administrator must submit a semi-annual report to the Commissioner containing an analysis of the RLF progress to date.
( d ) The Loan Administrator must submit to the Department a quarterly SF-269, Financial Status Report, or any equivalent report required by the Department.
§ 2105.1 What should you know up front? ( a ) This part contains the rules that the Agency follows in processing records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552.
( b ) Definitions of terms used in this part are found at § 2105.67.
( c ) This part should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the OMB Fee Guidelines.
( d ) This part does not entitle any person to any service or to the disclosure of any record that is not required under the FOIA.
( e ) You are encouraged to review the Agency's FOIA libraries before filing a FOIA request. The material you seek may be immediately available electronically at no cost.
§ 2502.40 Under what circumstances may AmeriCorps indemnify employees? AmeriCorps may, at its sole discretion, indemnify an AmeriCorps employee for a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award rendered against the employee personally in a claim or may settle or compromise a personal damages claim against an AmeriCorps employee if: ( a ) The CEO determines that the AmeriCorps employee's conduct giving rise to the verdict, judgment, monetary award, or claim was taken within the scope of their employment;
( b ) The CEO determines that the indemnification or settlement is in AmeriCorps' best interest; and
( c ) AmeriCorps appropriated funds are available for the indemnification or settlement.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
J.Paul Whitehead III, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CompuCredit Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: November 12, 2003 |  |                                                                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/J.PAUL WHITEHEAD, IIIJ.Paul Whitehead, III Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGION. DLC. 20M3 

NNrisaB MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Omick 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hiniennister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: Lisa Stevenson MfV 

Deputy General Counsel - Law ^ 

Lorenzo Hoiloway L^VaillA 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Fornian 

Attorney ^ 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on Committee for Charlotte/Charlotte DNC Host 

Committee (LRA 965) 

1. INTRODUCTION 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Finai Audit Report Cproposed 

Rqxm") on the Committee for Charlotte/Charlotte DNC Host Committee CCFCT). Theproposed 

Rqxnt contains two flndings: Recordkequng fbr InrKind Contributions finding 1) and 

Disclosure ofDisbursements (Finding 2). We concur with the findings. Ifyou have any questions, 

please contact Margaret J. Forman, the attorney assigned to this audit.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Form  10-QSB  of  California  Molecular
Electronics  Corporation  for  the  six months ended June 30, 2002, James Marek,
Jr.,  President  and Chief Executive Officer of California Molecular Electronics
Corporation,  hereby  certify  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:

     (1)  such  Form  10-QSB of California Molecular Electronics Corporation for
          the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  fully  complies  with  the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information contained in such Form 10-QSB of California Molecular
          Electronics Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 2002, fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and
          results of operations of California Molecular Electronics Corporation.



/s/  James Marek,  Jr.
----------------------
James Marek, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer



August 12, 2002


                                      -12-
<PAGE>
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. O.C. 20463 

MliMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Onock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: Lisa J. Stevenson '^^'S 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

DanitaCAlberico 

Attorney 

N0V 25 20H 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on the Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive 

Committee (LRA 963) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report C'DFAR*") 

on the Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee. The DFAR contains one 

finding: Recordkeeping for Employees. We concur with the finding. If you have any questions, 

please contact Danita C. Alberico, the attomey assigned to this audit.
#### § 205.160 Equipment—Federal financial participation.

Claims for Federal financial participation in the cost of equipment for the cash assistance programs under titles I, IV-A, X, XIV, XVI [AABD] and for the separate administrative unit established under section 402(a)(19)(G) of the Social Security Act are to be determined in accordance with subpart G or 45 CFR part 95. Requirements concerning the management and disposition of equipment under these titles are also prescribed in subpart G of 45 CFR part 95.

[47 FR 41576, Sept. 21, 1982]
§ 2556.735 May a VISTA be a candidate for public office? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no VISTA may run for the nomination to, or as a candidate for election to, partisan political office.
( b ) In accordance with the prohibitions set forth in § 2556.710, a VISTA may participate in elections as long as such participation: ( 1 ) Does not interfere with the performance of, or availability to perform, their assigned VISTA project duties;
( 2 ) Does not interference with the provision of service in the VISTA program;
( 3 ) Does not involve any use of VISTA assistance, resources or funds;
( 4 ) Would not result in the identification of the VISTA as being a participant in or otherwise associated with the VISTA program;
( 5 ) Is not conducted during scheduled VISTA service hours; and
( 6 ) Does not interfere with the full-time commitment to remain available for VISTA service without regard to regular working hours, at all times during periods of service, except for authorized periods of leave.
( c ) Provided that paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are adhered to, and in accordance with the prohibitions set forth in § 2556.710, a VISTA may: ( 1 ) Run as an independent candidate in a partisan election in designated U.S. municipalities and political subdivisions as set forth at 5 CFR part 733; and
( 2 ) Run as a candidate in a non-partisan election.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Materials Processing Equipment Technical Advisory Committee (MPETAC) will meet on November 16, 2006 at 9 a.m. in Room 3884 of the Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to materials processing equipment and related technology.

## Agenda

1. Opening Remarks and Introductions.

2. Presentation of Papers and Comments by the Public.

3. Presentation from the Office of Technology Evaluation.

4. Report on Wassenaar Experts Meeting.

5. Discussion of MPETAC 2007 Proposal.

6. MPETAC Future Activities.

7. Report on Proposed Changes to the Export Administration Regulation.

8. Other Business.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials two weeks prior to Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.*

For more information, please contact Ms. Springer at 202-482-2813.

Dated: October 24, 2006.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-8956 Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
§ 2555.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 2555.550.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 63 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair 

Labor Standards Act’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. 

BUDD, Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, Ms. ERNST, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. 

HAGERTY, Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. LEE, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. MORAN, 

Mr. MULLIN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. TUBERVILLE, 

and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor 

Standards Act’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the DeVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:42 Mar 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ63.IS SJ63

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 63 IS 

1 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Employee or Independent 

2 Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards 

3 Act’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 1638 (January 10, 2024)), and such 

4 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 2525.310 Under what circumstances will AmeriCorps pay interest that accrues on qualified student loans during an individual's term of service in an approved position? ( a ) *Eligibility.* AmeriCorps will pay interest that accrues on an Eligible Individual's qualified student loan, subject to the limitation on amount in paragraph (b) of this section, if: ( 1 ) The Eligible Individual successfully completes a term of national service in an approved position; and
( 2 ) The loan holder approves the Eligible Individual's request for forbearance for a time period specified by the loan holder during the term of service.
( b ) *Amount.* The portion of accrued interest that AmeriCorps will pay is determined by the length of service. The percentage of accrued interest that AmeriCorps will pay is the lesser of— ( 1 ) The product of— ( i ) The number of completed service hours divided by the number of days for which forbearance was granted; and
( ii ) 365 divided by 17; and
( 2 ) One hundred (100).
( c ) *Supplemental to education award.* A payment of accrued interest under this part is supplemental to an education award received by an Eligible Individual under this part.
( d ) *Limitation.* AmeriCorps is not responsible for the payment of any accrued interest in excess of the amount determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( e ) *Suspended service.* AmeriCorps will not pay interest expenses that accrue on an Eligible Individual's qualified student loan during a period of suspended service.