alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2553.23 What are a sponsor's project responsibilities? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545 , Aug. 30, 2024.
A sponsor shall: ( a ) Focus RSVP resources to have a positive impact on critical human and social needs within the project service area.
( b ) In collaboration with other community organizations or by using existing assessments, assess the needs of the community or service area, and develop strategies to respond to identified needs using RSVP volunteers.
( c ) Develop and manage one or more volunteer stations to provide a wide range of placement opportunities that appeal to persons age 55 and over by: ( 1 ) Ensuring that a volunteer station is a public or non-profit private organization, whether secular or faith-based, or an eligible proprietary health care agency, capable of serving as a volunteer station for the placement of RSVP volunteers to meet locally identified needs;
( 2 ) Ensuring the placement of RSVP volunteers is governed by a Memorandum of Understanding: ( i ) That is negotiated prior to placement;
( ii ) That specifies the mutual responsibilities of the station and sponsor;
( iii ) That is renegotiated at least every three years;
( iv ) That states the station will not discriminate against RSVP volunteers, service beneficiaries, or in the operation of its program on the basis of race, color, national origin including individuals with limited English proficiency, gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender identity or expression, political affiliation, marital or parental status, or military service; and
( v ) That states the station will provide for the safety of the RSVP volunteers assigned to the station.
( d ) Consider the demographic make-up of the project service area in the enrollment of RSVP volunteers, taking special efforts to recruit eligible individuals from minority groups, persons with disabilities and under represented groups.
( e ) Encourage the most efficient and effective use of RSVP volunteers by coordinating project services and activities with related national, state and local programs, including other CNCS programs.
( f ) Provide RSVP volunteers with cost reimbursements specified in § 2553.43.
( g ) Make every effort to meet such performance measures as established in the approved grant application.
[64 FR 14135, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 6875, Feb. 14, 2002; 69 FR 60095, Oct. 7, 2004; 76 FR 20246, Apr. 12, 2011; 83 FR 64655, Dec. 17, 2018]
Comments on SAC 12-01 John Livingston to: R9AirPermits 01/02/2014 01:59 PM

From: John Livingston <livingstonjohn@att.net>
To: R9AirPermits@EPA, Please respond to John Livingston <livingstonjohn@att.net>

Comment Letter 12-18-2013.docxDecember 18, 2013

Shaheerah Kelly U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (AIR

- 3)
75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

- 3901

Subject: Comments on Permit Application No. SAC 12

- 01

The proposed PSD permit modification for Sierra Pacific Industries to build a new biomass fired power plant should be denied. The following are comments.

1. The Best Available Control Technology (BACT) will allow the operator to collect data on the performan ce of the system. The operator should not be allowed to collect data that is relied upon by the EPA to ensure permit compliance. The operator should be required to have an independent company do the daily monitoring or a fee should be charged by EPA to all ow the Shasta County Air Pollution Agency to do the monitoring. There are many instances where owners of the facility will choose when to take the data and when it is not in their best interest
to take the data. If the operator is allowed to take the data then a fee should be paid to the County to allow them to randomly check for compliance.

2. The effect of this new facility on the air quality in the valley areas has been grossly underestimated. How can EPA say that the CO2 emissions from the plant will ha ve a negligible effect when they are equivalent to 90,000 automobiles? This is approximately a doubling of the pollution from existing conditions. If there is not a comparable offset in the valley areas, this permit should not be allowed. If no offset is r equired, the air quality in Shasta County will be adversely affected by this facility.

3. The air quality in Shasta County, especially in the Sacramento Valley

, is slowly deteriorating due to pollution from agricultural burning, forest fires, and winds push ing Sacramento pollution
north. The new cogeneration plant will significantly adversely affect the existing air quality in the county, especially near the plant. If the winds are from the south the poor air quality from the cogeneration plant will concentr ate due to the northern mountains providing a barrier. The
citizens of Shasta County will suffer the pollution from the facility and their health will be negatively impacted. Why should the citizens accept reductions in air quality when this facility is

on ly designed to profit a privately held corporation?

Sincerely,

John Livingston Excom Chair, Sierra Club Shasta Group
2378 Waldon Street Redding, CA 96001
§ 2490.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Director of Administration and Finance shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation, 2000 K Street, NW., suite 303, Washington, DC 20006.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate Government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 2490.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[58 FR 57699, Oct. 26, 1993]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Flex Fuels Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Barr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Thomas BarrName:
Thomas BarrTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
March 23, 2011
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:
September 12, 2006
    
    /s/ J. Scott Craighead

J. Scott CraigheadChief Financial Officer
§ 2554.45 Are there any limitations on the right to appeal to the authority head? ( a ) A defendant has no right to appear personally, or through a representative, before the authority head.
( b ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling.
( c ) The authority head will not consider any objection or evidence that was not raised before the ALJ unless the defendant demonstrates that the failure to object was caused by extraordinary circumstances. If the appealing defendant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the authority head that extraordinary circumstances prevented the presentation of evidence at the hearing, and that the additional evidence is material, the authority head may remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of the additional evidence.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 12, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9800 Filed 12-18-06; 11:32 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### In the Matter of Samuel H. Randall, an Attorney, Appellant. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent

*Matter of Bandall,*122 App. Div. 1, affirmed.

(Argued November 9, 1909;

decided November 23, 1909.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 7,1907, suspending the appellant from practice as an attorney and counselor at law.

*Samuel II. Randall*and *Uriah*IF. *Tomphins*for appellant.

*Egerton L. Winthrop, Jr.,*for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 4.6
                               RETRIEVAL DYNAMICS
                   INFORMATION MANGEMENT FOR THE PROFESSIONAL

                           CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


$25,000.00                                                        April 11, 2000

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RETRIEVAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, A Florida Corporation, whose
address is 630 S. Orange  Avenue,  Suite 102,  Sarasota,  Fl.  34243,  ("Maker")
promises  to pay to Ms.  Janet  Molino-Bem  ("Lender"),  whose  address is, 7456
Mariana Drive,  Sarasota,  Florida 34231 or his (her) assignee the principal sum
of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($ 25,000), together with interest as follows:

*    Simple interest shall accrue on the unpaid  principal  balance at a rate of
     Nine Percent (9%) per annum and payable at maturity.

*    The principal  balance and any accrued but unpai interest  hereunder is due
     and shall be payable in not more than thirty days (30days) following one of
     the following events:

     1.   The Maker enters into or performs an Initial Public  Offering for its'
          Common Stock under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933.
     2.   The Maker enters into an agreement to merger,  or reverse  merger with
          another Corporation.
     3.   The Maker  enters  into an  agreement  to sell or cause to be sold the
          Stock of the Corporation under a but-out agreement.

Should the Maker effect or cause to affect the events  stipulated under (1), (2)
or (3) above, the Lender, at his /her sole discretion has the right to:

*    Request payment of principal and interest

*    Convert the  Promissory  Note and  interest,  into the Common  Stock of the
     Maker or the surviving  Corporation.  If available,  the Lender may request
     Preferred Stock.

*    Convert any part of the  principal  and interest due, into The Common Stock
     of the Maker or the surviving Corporation. The Lender may request Preferred
     Stock if available.

The Lender, upon election of his/her conversion option,  shall have the right to
acquire the Common Stock, Preferred if available,  of the Maker or the surviving
Corporation  at a price equal to Fifty  Percent (50%) of the market price at the
time of offering. In the event that the Nasdaq- OTC price structure is used, the
price shall be computed at Fifty Percent (50%) of the average,  BID / ASK price,
at the time of offering.

IN WITHNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned has caused this Note to be signed by its
duly authorized Officer, and this Note to be dated this 11th day of April 2000.

                              RETRIEVAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION

                              By: /s/ Peter Voghel
                              Name:   Peter Voghel
                              Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

October 28, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

THROUGH: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Patricia Carmona 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Joseph F. Stoltz 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Alec Palmer 

Acting Staff Director 

Christopher Hughey ^ 

Acting General Counsel' 

Lawrence L. Calvert, 

Associate General Cou; 

General Law and Advice 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Danita C. Lee 

Attorney 

Draft Final Audit Report - Republican Party of Minnesota 

(LRA 821) 

The Audit Division forwarded to the Office of General Counsel the Draft Final 

Audit Report ("Report") on the Republican Party of Minnesota on October 13,2010. 

This Office reviewed the Report and concurs with the Audit Division's finding. If you 

have any questions, please contact Danita C. Lee, the attomey assigned to this audit. ^ 

' The Office of General Counsel recommends that the Commission consider this document in open 

session since the proposed Report does not include matters exempt from public disclosure. See 11 C.F.R. 

§2.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT, BALANCE SHEET AND CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068874
<NAME> IMPLANT SCIENCES
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,239,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  906,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,720
<INVENTORY>                                     46,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,291,480
<PP&E>                                       3,468,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                 980,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,069,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,339,855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       570,808
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,662,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,069,898
<SALES>                                      3,098,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,098,256
<CGS>                                        4,862,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,862,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,627,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,627,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,627,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1595 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1595 EH

1 SECTION 1. BRIAN K. SCHRAMM POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian 

5 K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1595 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. ester, New York, as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm al Service located at 3245 Latta Road in Roch-
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Kennedy, Appellant, *v.*Frank A. O'Donnel et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents. The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Kennedy, as Administrator of the Estate of John Kennedy, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Frank A. O'Donnel et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents.

*People ex rel. Kennedy v. O'Donnel,*133 App. Div. 237, 924, affirmed.

(Submitted January 5, 1910;

decided January 25, 1910.)

Appeal in each of the above-entitled proceedings from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 4, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari and confirming an assessment for purposes of taxation.

*Artemas B. Smith*for appellants.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Curtis A. Peters*and *George H. Folwell*of counsel), for respondents.

Orders affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Edward T. Bartlett, J.
**Paperwork Burden Statement**

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of inform ation is estimated to average 5.5 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respo nd to this collection is mandatory (20 USC 1092) to obtain or retain benefits. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Postsecondary Education , 1990 K St., NW, Office 8031, Washington, DC 20006

- 1103 or email Jessica.Finkel@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1840

- 0827 . Note: Please do not return the completed Equity in Athletics Survey to this address.