alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1602 

To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without consideration, 

to Piasecki Aircraft Corporation the right, title, and interest of the 

United States in and to Navy aircraft N40VT, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2009 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without 

consideration, to Piasecki Aircraft Corporation the right, 

title, and interest of the United States in and to Navy 

aircraft N40VT, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF NAVY AIRCRAFT N40VT. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—The Secretary of the 

5 Navy may convey, without consideration, to Piasecki Air6 craft Corporation of Essington, Pennsylvania (in this sec7 tion referred to as ‘‘transferee’’), all right, title, and inter8 est of the United States, except as set forth elsewhere 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1602 IH

1 herein, in and to Navy aircraft N40VT (Bureau Number 

2 163283) and associated components and test equipment, 

3 previously specified as Government furnished equipment, 

4 specified in contract N00019–00–C–0284. The convey5 ance shall be made by means of a deed of gift. 

6 (b) CONDITION OF AIRCRAFT.—The aircraft shall be 

7 conveyed under subsection (a) in its current, ‘‘as is’’ condi8 tion. The Secretary is not required to repair or alter the 

9 condition of the aircraft before conveying ownership of the 

10 aircraft. 

11 (c) CONVEYANCE AT NO COST TO THE UNITED

12 STATES.—The conveyance of the aircraft under subsection 

13 (a) shall be made at no cost to the United States. Any 

14 costs associated with the conveyance shall be borne by the 

15 transferee. 

16 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

17 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi18 tions in connection with a conveyance under this section 

19 as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter20 ests of the United States. 

21 (e) CLARIFICATION OF LIABILITY.—Notwithstanding 

22 any other provision of law, upon the conveyance of the 

23 Navy aircraft N40VT (Bureau Number 163283) under 

24 subsection (a), the United States shall not be liable for 

25 any death, injury, loss, or damage that results from the 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1602 IH

1 use of that aircraft by any person other than the United 

2 States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Hillsborough,

No. 5774.

#### James McCostis *v.*Nashua Pressmen Union *& a.*

Argued September 4, 1968.

Decided November 26, 1968.

*227*Winer, Lynch & Pillsbury {Mr. S. Robert Winer*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Sullivan, Gregg & Horton {Mr. James L. Sullivan*orally), for the defendants.

Per curiam.

This is an action by which plaintiff seeks to recover pension benefits under a plan contained in the constitution and bylaws of the defendant International Union. The plan has now been terminated and the fund liquidated. The Trial Court *(Loughlin,*J.) returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,567.27 on an agreed statement of facts. The sole question before us is whether the plaintiff was entitled to receive a pension at the time of his retirement on April 1, 1962.

The pension plan was established by the defendant International Union in 1917. Prior to April 1961, the constitution provided that “ any member . . . who has reached the age of sixty years and who has been in continuous good standing for a period of twenty years and retires from employment in the printing industry shall receive a monthly pension . . . . ”

On September 1, 1960 the plaintiff had completed twenty years of continuous good standing and was more than sixty years of age. However, he elected not to retire from employment in the printing industry at that time.

On or about September 26, 1960, at a convention of the defendant International Union, it was voted to submit a proposed change in the eligibility requirements for pension benefits to the membership by way of referendum. The change, which was duly adopted and became effective about April 1, 1961, required twenty-five years continuous membership in good standing and that the member should have reached the age of sixty - five years and have retired from employment in the printing industry. The plaintiff retired on April 1, 1962, after less than twenty-five years of continuous good standing. He applied for a pension more than a year later, and was refused.

The issue simply stated is whether the plaintiff’s right to a pension became vested upon his having attained the age of sixty *228years and having been in twenty years continuous good standing before the change in the constitution, or whether actual retirement from employment before that time was an additional prerequisite to his right becoming vested.

The defendant argues that actual retirement was a condition precedent to the vesting of the plaintiff’s rights. The constitution prior to amendment provided that he “who has reached the age of sixty years and who has been in continuous good standing for a period of twenty years *and retires*...” shall receive a pension. ( Emphasis supplied.) We hold that actual retirement was a condition precedent to eligibility and therefore to vesting.

Since the plaintiff did not retire prior to the change in eligibility requirements, he acquired no vested rights and is bound by the amended provisions under which he is ineligible for benefits, *United Mine Workers*v. *Quaker City Iron*Works, 48 CCH Lab. Cas. *29, 782, par.*18,468 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl., 1963).

*Judgment for the defendants.*
#### § 59.2 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in § 59.3 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1024-0047. The information is being collected to determine whether to approve a project sponsor's request to convert an assisted site or facility to other than public outdoor recreation uses. The information will be used to assure that the requirements of section 6(f)(3) of the L&WCF Act would be met should the proposed conversion be implemented. Response is required in order to obtain the benefit of Department of the Interior approval.
#### Kennerdell *v.*Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

July 15, 1914:

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This case presents only the same questions which were considered in the case of Carson N. Reed v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 83, and for the reasons there stated the judgment is affirmed.
§ 2556.770 What are the requirements of VISTA sponsors and subrecipients regarding political activities? ( a ) All sponsors and subrecipients are required to: ( 1 ) Understand the restrictions and prohibitions on the political activities of VISTAs, as set forth in this subpart;
( 2 ) Provide training to VISTAs on all applicable restrictions and prohibitions on political activities, as set forth in this subpart, and use training materials that are consistent with these restrictions and prohibitions;
( 3 ) Monitor on a continuing basis the activity of VISTAs for compliance with this subpart; and
( 4 ) Report all violations or questionable situations immediately to the appropriate AmeriCorps Region Office.
( b ) Failure of a sponsor to comply with the requirements of this subpart, or a violation of the requirements contained in this subpart by the sponsor or subrecipient, sponsor or subrecipient's covered employees, agents, or VISTAs, may be deemed a material failure to comply with terms or conditions of the VISTA program. In such a case, the sponsor is subject to procedures related to the denial or reduction, or suspension or termination, of such assistance, as provided in §§ 2556.125, 2556.130, and 2556.140.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice of a decision to designate a class of employees at the Oak Ridge Thermal Diffusion Plant (S-50), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On November 9, 2006, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

Employees of the Department of Energy predecessor agencies and their contractors and subcontractors who were monitored or should have been monitored while working at the S-50 Oak Ridge Thermal Diffusion Plant working for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work day during the period from July 9, 1944, through December 31, 1951, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the SEC.

                        This designation will become effective on December 9, 2006, unless Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to the SEC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: November 30, 2006.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational, Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 06-9588 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 10-f-1

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              NORDSON CORPORATION
                      EXCESS DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN



                  The Nordson Corporation Excess Defined Benefit Pension Plan
(hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"), as originally established for the
benefit of certain designated salaried employees effective as of November 1,
1985, is hereby amended, effective as January 1, 1989, to provide as follows:

         1. Section 1.1 of the Plan is amended by the addition of a new
paragraph (f) at the end thereof to provide as follows:

                  (f) The term "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended from time to time. Reference to a section of the Code shall
include such section and any comparable section or sections of any future
legislation that amends, supplements, or supersedes such section.

         2. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the Plan are amended to provide as follows:

                  2.1 ELIGIBILITY. An Employee who retires, dies, or otherwise
terminates his employment with the Company under conditions which make such
Employee or Beneficiary eligible for a benefit under the Salaried Pension Plan,
and whose benefits under the Salaried Pension Plan are limited by Section 415 of
the Code, or, for periods commencing on and after November 1, 1989, Section
401(a)(17) of the Code, shall be eligible for an excess pension benefit
determined by Section 2.2.

                  2.2 AMOUNT. Subject to the provisions of Article III, the
monthly excess pension benefit payable to an Employee or Beneficiary shall be
such an amount which, when added to the monthly pension payable (before any
reduction applicable to an optional method of payment) under the Salaried
Pension Plan to such person, equals the monthly pension benefit that would have
been payable (before any reduction applicable to an optional method of payment)
under the Salaried Pension Plan to such person if the limitations of Section 415
of the Code and, for periods commencing on and after November 1, 1989, Section
401(a)(17) of the Code were not in effect.

                    *                  *                  *

EXECUTED at Westlake, Ohio, this              day of                     , 1989.



<PAGE>   2


                                            NORDSON CORPORATION



                                            By  _______________________________
                                                Title:
#### § 2400.46 Special consideration: second master's degree.

The Foundation may award Senior Fellowships to applicants who are seeking their second master's degrees providing that the applicants' first master's degree was obtained at least three years prior to the year in which the applicants would normally commence study under a fellowship. In evaluating applications from individuals intending to pursue a second master's degree, the Fellow Selection Committee will favor those applicants who are planning to become American history, American government, social studies, or political science teachers after having taught another subject and applicants whose initial master's degree was in a subject different from that sought under the second master's degree.

[61 FR 46734, Sept. 5, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 11814, Mar. 12, 2004]
#### § 51.68 If a concessioner under a 1965 Act concession contract is not awarded a new concession contract, how will a concessioner that has a possessory interest receive compensation for its possessory interest?

A concessioner that has possessory interest in real property improvements pursuant to the terms of a 1965 Act concession contract, will, if the prior concessioner does not seek or is not awarded a new concession contract upon expiration or other termination of its 1965 Act concession contract, be entitled to receive compensation for its possessory interest in the amount and manner described by the possessory interest concession contract. The concessioner shall also be entitled to receive all other compensation, including any compensation for property in which there is no possessory interest, to the extent and in the manner that the possessory interest contract may provide.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Spike ) 

Maynard for Congress (A 11 -02) ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on January 25,2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Spike 

Maynard for Congress (Al 1-02), as reconmiended in the Memorandum from 

the Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated January 18,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn n, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

ate ' Shawn Woodhead Werth / 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
Public Hearing for Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Economy Standards for 

Model Year 2017-2025 Light-duty Vehicles

Hard Copies of Testimony and Other Materials Provided by Testifiers

San Francisco Public Hearing

January 24, 2012

Docket Attachment 1: Hard copies of testimony provided by testifiers to EPA/NHTSA panel

Name Affiliation Page 

Tom Cackette California Air Resources Board 1

Erica Morehouse Environmental Defense Fund 5

Larry Greene National Association of Clean Air Agencies 11

Forrest McConnell NADA 15

Alan Lloyd International Council on Clean Transportation 19

Don Anair Union of Concerned Scientists 21

Gary Latshaw Citizen 25

Lacy Plache Edmunds.com 27

John Cabaniss Global Automakers 30

Simon Mui Natural Resources Defense Council 33

John A. “Skip” Laitner American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 37

Chris Busch BlueGreen Alliance 44

Barbara Nocera Mazda North America 47

Frankie Ridolfi Small Business Majority/Climate Earth 50

Celia Canfield Small Business Majority 52

Theodore Hadzi-Antich Pacific Legal Foundation 55

Norman Brown Delta Construction Company 56

Dave Dempsey San Francisco State University 57

David Pepper American Lung Association 59

John Boesel CALSTART 62

Colleen Quinn Coulomb Technology 65

Susan Stephenson California Interfaith Power & Light 70

Peyton Fleming Ceres 71

Susan Frank California Clean Cars Campaign 72

Will Barrett American Lung Association in California 81

Lance Tunick On behalf of Aston Martin, Lotus, and McLaren 85

Docket Attachment 2: Submitted by E100 Ethanol Group – Slide of Oral Testimony Regarding the lightduty GHG and CAFE Vehicle Standards for model years 2017-2025

Docket Attachment 3: Submitted by SAFE – U.S. Oil Intensity and Oil Spending
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2018 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

1050 FIRST STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR)

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes for October 25, 2018

Draft Advisory Opinion 2018-15: Wyden 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2018-13: OsiaNetwork LLC

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Friends of Erik Paulsen 

(FEP) (A17-06) 

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Dayna C. Brown, 

Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Signed: _____________________________________

Dayna C. Brown

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: November 8, 2018
CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 906


EX-32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Current Report of Crystal International Travel Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fabrizzio Busso-Campana, Chief Executive Office of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Action of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/  Fabrizzio Busso-Campana--------------------------------------Chief Executive OfficerJune 21, 2006
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-601 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Signed at Washington June 1, 2004 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 CANADA 

 Scientific Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington June 1, 2004; 

 Entered into force June 1, 2004.
#### §§ 1233.11-1233.12 [Reserved]
§ 1225.10 Corrective action. When it has been determined by final agency decision that the aggrieved party has been subjected to illegal discrimination, the following corrective actions may be taken: ( a ) Selection as a member or volunteer for aggrieved parties found to have been denied selection based on prohibited discrimination.
( b ) Reappointment to national service for aggrieved parties found to have been early-terminated as a result of prohibited discrimination. To the extent possible, a member or volunteer will be placed in the same position previously held. However, reassignment to the specific position previously held is contingent on several programmatic considerations such as the continued availability of the position. If the same position is deemed to be no longer available, the aggrieved party will be offered a reassignment to a position in as similar circumstances to the position previously held, or to resign from service for reasons beyond his or her control. Such a reassignment may require both additional training and an additional commitment to national service.
( c ) Provision for reasonable attorney fees and other costs incurred by the aggrieved party.
( d ) Such other relief as may be deemed appropriate by the CEO or their designee.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dean L. Cash, ChiefExecutive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of ATELCapital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:                          | August 22, 2005 |
|--------------------------------|-----------------|
|                           |            |
|                           |            |
| /s/ Dean L. Cash               |            |   |
| Dean L. Cash                   |            |
| President and Chief  Executive |            |
| Officer of Managing Member     |            |
|                                |                 |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----