alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Business Office: 1320 Brookwood Dr. Little Rock AR 72202
T- 800.413.4445 F- 866-839-8595 www.vdci.net 

# Vector Disease Control International LLC**···-'·~\** 

## Date: 4 APR 2013

To: Department ofTransportation

.....**~";** 

## u From Vector Disease Control International, LLC
Subject: Dump exception extension 

## Docket Number FAA-2011-0660

Vector Diseases Control International, LLC would like to request an extension ofthe Dump exemption that we now hold. The operation has not changed and will continue

as before. Thanks

# 'UA~w?·11·~--'--- 1 

## tams Manager Aerial DivisionVector Disease Control International, LLC

MALCOM WILLIAMS ManagerAerial Division/ChiefPilot VectorDisease Control International,LLC 

### mwilliams@vdci.net 

## PH 318-372-4073Date: 3/29/2013 Exemption No: 10369 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)- Part 137.53 (c)(2) will expire on 9/30/2013. If appropriate, please submit your request to extend this exemption (including the docket number FAA-2011-0660) within 30 days ofthe date ofthis notice. Otherwise, the FAA may not be able to process your request ·for extension before the expiration date. You may either submit your request electronically through the internet using the Docket Management System web site at: http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to:

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Submission to other locations may delay processing. Any request for extension must meetthe requirements of 14 CFR part 11. Ifyou have already requested an extension for this exemption or no longer f**~:** r**~-** _, -.·

::-.· e::



### Malcom Williams ManagerAerial Division ChiefPilot VectorDisease Control International, LLC.**•--~** 

### 1320 Brookwood Dr Little Rock, AR 72202

need this exemption, please ignore this notice.

.. • 

# I l

.. . . ....· .. · · · ..

# 1 . · ·· 111"'11 II" 

## 'JuiJ J•ljllfiJ•pJIJ'Jilu;hppJJ•IIJ 11t'l'i'f
Exhibit 31 FORM OF ANNUAL  BACK-UP CERTIFICATION Re:The Pooling And Servicing Agreement, dated as of  July 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), by and among J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I, as depositor (the "Depositor"),  HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee") and  U.S. Bank National Association, in its dual capacities as master servicer (the "Master Servicer") and securities administrator. I, Bryan Calder, the Executive Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association,  certify to the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Securities Administrator, and their officers, with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that: (1) I have reviewed (i) the servicer compliance statement of the Company provided in accordance with Section 11.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Compliance Statement"), (ii) the report on assessment of the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria provided in accordance with Section 11.06 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (iii) the registered public accounting firm's attestation report provided in accordance with Section 11.07 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Attestation Report"), and all servic ing reports, officer's certificates and other information relating to the servicing of the Mortgage Loans by the Company during 200[ ] that were delivered by the Company to the Securities Administrator pursuant to the Agreement (collectively, the "Company Servicing Information"); (2) Based on my knowledge, the Company Servicing Information, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period of time covered by the Company Servicing Information; (3) Based on my knowledge, all of the Company Servicing Information required to be provided by the Company under the Agreement has been provided to the Securities Administrator; (4) I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Company as servicer under the Agreement, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the Compliance Statement and except as disclosed in the Compliance Statement, the Servicing Assessment or the Attestation Report, the Company has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects; and (5) The Compliance Statement required to be delivered by the Company pursuant to the Agreement, and the Servicing Assessment and Attestation Report required to be provided by the Company and by any Subservicer or Subcontractor pursuant to the Agreement, have been provided to Securities Administrator.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed to Securities Administrator.  Any material instance of noncompliance with the Servicing Criteria has been disclosed in such reports. By: /s/ Bryan CalderName: Bryan Calder Title: Executive Vice President Date: 3/30/2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 24, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 06-30857 Summary Calendar

_____________________ CAROLYN ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Lake Charles

USDC No. 2:05-CV-546

__________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by2

Magistrate Judge Wilson in his report of May 12, 2006 and affirmed by the district court. AFFIRMED.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 2467 Lower Tribunal No. CF16

- 000672

- XX

_____________________________
L OUIS W ILLOUGHBY , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County

. Sharon M. Franklin , Judge.

August 27, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

. TRAVER, C.J., and NARDELLA and MIZE , JJ., c oncur.

Louis Willoughby, Madison, pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2006
    
    /s/ J. Scott Craighead

J. Scott CraigheadChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|  

/s/ Roger P. Deschenes

 

Roger P. Deschenes

 

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2013

 

This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Salter, administratrix, etc., v. Utica and Black River Railroad Company, appellant.

Appeal from an order denying motion for a new trial after a verdict at the circuit in favor of plaintiff. The action was brought by Elizabeth S. Salter as administratrix, etc., of Frederick Salter, deceased, to recover for the death of her husband, the intestate, from defendant’s negligence.

*James F. Starbuck,*for appellant.

*Fulton & Kibby*and *F. W. Hubbard,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The opinion holds that the verdict of the jury should not be disturbed upon the facts.

*Order affirmed.*
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                  American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

                 American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3
           Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-3

            I, David M. Friedman, a duly authorized officer of
      American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., as servicer (the
       "Servicer") pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of
      July 28, 2006 (the "Agreement"), among Wells Fargo Bank,
      N.A., as Master Servicer, American Home Mortgage Corp., as
      Sponsor, the Servicer and Citibank, N.A., as Trustee, hereby
      certify that:

            1.      A review of the Servicer's activities during
      the period from and including January 1, 2006 through and
      including December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") and of
      the Servicer's performance under the Agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

            2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such
      review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
      under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
      Reporting Period.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed
      this Certificate this 9th day of March, 2007.

                              By:  /s/ David M. Friedman
                              -----------------------------
                              Name:  David M. Friedman
                              Title: Executive
                              Vice President
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-079
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

    The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., and its officers and agents

Date:  September 10, 2007


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum

Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior officer in charge of securitization
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
§ 2552.43 What income guidelines govern eligibility to serve as a stipended Foster Grandparent? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70543 , Aug. 30, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) To receive a stipend, a Foster Grandparent may not have an annual income from all sources, after deducting allowable medical expenses, which exceeds the program's income eligibility guideline for the State in which he or she resides. The income eligibility guideline for each State is 200 percent of the poverty line, as set forth in 42 U.S.C. 9902 (2).
( b ) For applicants to become stipended Foster Grandparents, annual income is projected for the following 12 months, based on income at the time of application. For serving stipended Foster Grandparents, annual income is counted for the past 12 months. Annual income includes the applicant or enrollee's income and that of his/her spouse, if the spouse lives in the same residence.
( c ) Allowable medical expenses are annual out-of-pocket medical expenses for health insurance premiums, health care services, and medications provided to the applicant, enrollee, or spouse which were not and will not be paid by Medicare, Medicaid, other insurance, or other third party pay or, and which do not exceed 50 percent of the applicable income guideline.
( d ) Applicants whose income is not more than 100 percent of the poverty line shall be given special consideration for enrollment.
( e ) Once enrolled, a Foster Grandparent shall remain eligible to serve and to receive a stipend so long as his or her income, does not exceed the applicable income eligibility guideline by 20 percent.
[64 FR 14126, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 61000, Sept. 27, 2002; 69 FR 19775, Apr. 14, 2004. Redesignated at 72 FR 48585, Aug. 24, 2007; 74 FR 46509, Sept. 10, 2009; 83 FR 64651, Dec. 17, 2018]
October 24 , 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALI YAZDCHI , Appellant

NO. 14

- 17

- 00462

- CV V.

KENNETH MINGLEDORFF AKA MINGLEDORFF LA W FIRM , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on March 6, 2017. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69138-69139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which

[[Page 69139]]

constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel; G08 Re-Review.
    Date: December 1, 2006.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 6705 
Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Arthur A. Petrosian, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of 
Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 
301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968. 301-496-4253. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#29594c5d5b465a4048694448404507474041074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4b4a1b0b6abb7ada584a9a5ada8eaaaadaceaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 21, 2006.
David Clary,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9460 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 160.201 Statutory basis.

The provisions of this subpart implement section 1178 of the Act, section 262 of Public Law 104-191, section 264(c) of Public Law 104-191, and section 13421(a) of Public Law 111-5.

[78 FR 5689, Jan. 25, 2013]
No. 2620.

#### Ben Presley *v.*The State.

Fraudulent Disposition oe Mortgaged Property—Indictment-Fact Case.—The indictment in this case alleges that the mortgaged property was fraudulently disposed of by the accused to some person to the grand jury unknown. The evidence shows that it was disposed of to one Ike Thomas, and that the grand jury either knew, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence could have ascertained, that fact. *Held,*that the indictment is sufficient to charge the offense of fraudulently disposing of mortgaged property, but the evidence disproving an essential allegation in the said indictment, is insufficient to support the conviction.

Appeal from the District Court of Freestone. Tried below before the Hon. Sam R. Frost.

The conviction in this case was for fraudulently disposing of a horse on which the accused had previously executed a chattel mortgage, and the penalty assessed was a term of three years in the penitentiary.

The testimony of the prosecuting witness shows that when he reported this cause to the grand jury he knew that Ike Thomas was the person to whom defendant had traded the horse, and that said Thomas at that time was living in Freestone county.

*495Opinion delivered December 14, 1887.

*Kirven, Gardner & Etheredge,*for the appellant.

*W. L, Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt,. Judge.

This conviction was for fraudulently selling, trading and disposing of certain mortgaged property. It is alleged in the indictment that the property was sold, traded and disposed of to a certain person whose name is to the grand jurors unknown. Upon the trial it was shown that the property —a horse—was traded to one Ike Thomas, and this fact was evidently known to the grand jury, or could have been known by the smallest degree of diligence.

If the name of the person to whom the property was sold or traded was known to the grand jury, it was essential that it should have been given in the indictment. The Assistant Attorney General contends that, since the question is the intent to defraud, it matters not to whom the property was sold or traded. While this is true, the indictment should nevertheless inform the accused of the name of the person to whom the property was sold or traded. (Bush v. The State, 1 Texas, 455; Bunch v. The State, 1 Texas, 609; Schwartz v. The State, 25 Texas, 764.)

The indictment in this case is sufficient; but the proof fails to sustain the allegation that the name of the person to whom the property was sold or traded was unknown to the grand jury. As above stated, the proof shows beyond doubt that the horse was traded to Ike Thomas, which fact could have been ascertained by the use of any diligence whatever.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*