alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 1 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 2 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 3 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 4 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 5 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 6 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 7 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 8 of 9

Case 1:16-cv-01088-RJL   Document 20   Filed 01/30/17   Page 9 of 9
§ 164.103 Definitions. As used in this part, the following terms have the following meanings: *Common control* exists if an entity has the power, directly or indirectly, significantly to influence or direct the actions or policies of another entity.
*Common ownership* exists if an entity or entities possess an ownership or equity interest of 5 percent or more in another entity.
*Covered functions* means those functions of a covered entity the performance of which makes the entity a health plan, health care provider, or health care clearinghouse.
*Health care component* means a component or combination of components of a hybrid entity designated by the hybrid entity in accordance with § 164.105(a)(2)(iii)(D).
*Hybrid entity* means a single legal entity: ( 1 ) That is a covered entity;
( 2 ) Whose business activities include both covered and non-covered functions; and
( 3 ) That designates health care components in accordance with paragraph § 164.105(a)(2)(iii)(D).
*Law enforcement official* means an officer or employee of any agency or authority of the United States, a State, a territory, a political subdivision of a State or territory, or an Indian tribe, who is empowered by law to: ( 1 ) Investigate or conduct an official inquiry into a potential violation of law; or
( 2 ) Prosecute or otherwise conduct a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding arising from an alleged violation of law.
*Plan sponsor* is defined as defined at section 3(16)(B) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1002(16)(B).
*Required by law* means a mandate contained in law that compels an entity to make a use or disclosure of protected health information and that is enforceable in a court of law. *Required by law* includes, but is not limited to, court orders and court-ordered warrants; subpoenas or summons issued by a court, grand jury, a governmental or tribal inspector general, or an administrative body authorized to require the production of information; a civil or an authorized investigative demand; Medicare conditions of participation with respect to health care providers participating in the program; and statutes or regulations that require the production of information, including statutes or regulations that require such information if payment is sought under a government program providing public benefits.
[68 FR 8374, Feb. 20, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 42767, Aug. 24, 2009; 78 FR 34266, June 7, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1625 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1625

   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to cover physician 
services delivered by podiatric physicians to ensure access by Medicaid 
       beneficiaries to appropriate quality foot and ankle care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

Ms. DeGette (for herself, Mr. Castle, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Braley 
  of Iowa, and Mr. McCotter) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to cover physician 
services delivered by podiatric physicians to ensure access by Medicaid 
       beneficiaries to appropriate quality foot and ankle care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equity and Access for Podiatric 
Physicians Under Medicaid Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUDING PODIATRISTS AS PHYSICIANS UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a)(5)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(5)(A)) is amended by striking ``section 
1861(r)(1)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 
1861(r)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to services 
        furnished on or after January 1, 2010.
            (2) Extension of effective date for state law amendment.--
        In the case of a State plan under title XIX of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) which the Secretary of 
        Health and Human Services determines requires State legislation 
        in order for the plan to meet the additional requirement 
        imposed by the amendment made by subsection (a), the State plan 
        shall not be regarded as failing to comply with the 
        requirements of such title solely on the basis of its failure 
        to meet these additional requirements before the first day of 
        the first calendar quarter beginning after the close of the 
        first regular session of the State legislature that begins 
        after the date of enactment of this Act. For purposes of the 
        previous sentence, in the case of a State that has a 2-year 
        legislative session, each year of the session is considered to 
        be a separate regular session of the State legislature.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6399** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DANA AMILE CAPEHART , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:06

- cr - 00113

- RAJ

- FBS

- 1 )

Submitted : August 16, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dana Amile Capehart, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dana Ami le Capehart appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Capehart , No. 2:06

- cr - 00113

- RAJ

- FBS

- 1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2015-3635
PUBLIC LAW 112–32—SEPT. 30, 2011 125 STAT. 361 

Public Law 112–32 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Combating Autism Act of 2006. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combating Autism Reauthorization Act of 2011’’. 

SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SURVEILLANCE AND 

RESEARCH PROGRAM. 

Part R of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

280i et seq.) is amended— 

(1) in section 399AA(e), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘2014’’; 

(2) in section 399BB(g), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘2014’’; 

(3) in section 399CC(f), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘2014’’; and 

(4) in section 399DD— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Not later than 4 

years after the date of enactment of the Combating Autism 

Act of 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than 2 years after 

the date of enactment of the Combating Autism Reauthorization Act of 2011’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b), in paragraphs (4) and (5), by 

striking ‘‘the 4-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the 6-year period beginning 

on the date of enactment of the Combating Autism Act 

of 2006’’. 

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Section 399EE of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

280i–4) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 399EE. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

‘‘(a) DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SURVEILLANCE AND

RESEARCH PROGRAM.—To carry out section 399AA, there is authorized to be appropriated $22,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 

through 2014. 

‘‘(b) AUTISM EDUCATION, EARLY DETECTION, AND INTERVEN- TION.—To carry out section 399BB, there is authorized to be appropriated $48,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2014. 

‘‘(c) INTERAGENCY AUTISM COORDINATING COMMITTEE; CERTAIN

OTHER PROGRAMS.—To carry out sections 399CC, 404H, and 409C, 

Time period. 

Deadline. 

42 USC 280i–2. 

42 USC 280i–1. 

42 USC 280i. 

42 USC 201 note. 

Combating 

Autism 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2011. 

Sept. 30, 2011 

[H.R. 2005] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
125 STAT. 362 PUBLIC LAW 112–32—SEPT. 30, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2005 (S. 1094): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Sept. 20, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

there is authorized to be appropriated $161,000,000 for each of 

fiscal years 2011 through 2014.’’. 

Approved September 30, 2011. 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00031-CR

Rosendo Torres, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, 283RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. F-9603701-WT, HONORABLE PAUL BANNER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Rosendo Torres pleaded guilty to possessing more than 400 grams of

methamphetamine with intent to deliver. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (f) (West

Supp. 2003). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at twenty years in

prison and a $10,000 fine.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
2

Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: November 20, 2003

Do Not Publish
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 41 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141763) and Amendment No. 406 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company
      of New York and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    June 5, 2020
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 16220          Scale: 315,350          Edition: 5          Edition Date: 08-FEB-97          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1997/17**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
#### § 270.12 Must States file the data electronically?

Each State must submit the data required to compete for the high performance bonus work measures and the Medicaid/SCHIP measures electronically in a manner that we and CMS will specify.
#### § 1258.2 What definitions apply to the regulations in this part?

*Accession* means the method of acquiring archival records or donated materials from various Governmental bodies.

*Archival records* means records that have been accessioned into the legal custody of NARA, donated historical materials in the legal custody of NARA and its Presidential libraries, and Congressional, Supreme Court, and other historical materials in NARA's physical custody and for which NARA has a formal agreement for their permanent retention.

*Certification* means affixing a seal to copies certifying the copies are a valid reproduction of a file; this service is available for an additional fee.

*Cost* means the total amount of money spent by the NATF for providing services including, but not limited to, salaries; benefits; rent; communication and utilities; printing and reproductions; consulting and other services; payments to other agencies/funds; supplies and materials; depreciation; system upgrades/replacements; *etc.*

*Custodial units* mean NARA's Federal Records Centers, National Personnel Records Center, archival reference operations nationwide, and Presidential Libraries.

*Fee* means the price researchers pay for reproductions of records. Certification of records is also a reproduction fee.

*Records center records* means Federal records in the physical custody of NARA records centers, but still in the legal custody of the agencies that created and maintained them.
§ 400.206 Federal funding for social services and targeted assistance services. ( a ) Federal funding is available for refugee social services as set forth in Subpart I of this part, including the reasonable and necessary identifiable administrative costs of providing such services, in accordance with allocations by the Director.
( b ) Federal funding is available for targeted assistance services as set forth in subpart L of this part, including reasonable and necessary identifiable State administrative costs of providing such services, not to exceed 5 percent of the total targeted assistance award to the State.
[54 FR 5483, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 33604, June 28, 1995]
§ 1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients use? ( a ) A recipient may use any form of bond, such as individual, name schedule, position schedule, blanket, or any combination of such forms of bonds, as long as the type or combination of bonds secured adequately protects LSC funds.
( b ) A recipient may use similar forms of insurance that essentially fulfill the same purpose as a fidelity bond.
**1. Chief Executive Officer and President:**         **Performance Relative To Revenue Target and****Percentage** **Operating Income Target at that Level of Revenue****of Base** **(in accordance with the Company’s internal****Salary** **operating plan)**      0.00% < 95% 52.50% ≥ 95% and < 98% 59.50% ≥ 98% and < 100% 70.00% ≥ 100% and < 101%5 80.00% ≥ 101% and < 103% 85.00% ≥ 103% and < 105% 90.00% ≥ 105% and < 107% 95.00% ≥ 107% and < 110% 100.00% ≥ 110%**2. Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice Presidents:**         **Performance Relative To Revenue Target and****Percentage** **Operating Income Target at that Level of Revenue****of Base** **(in accordance with the Company’s internal****Salary** **operating plan)**      0.00% < 95% 33.75% ≥ 95% and < 98% 38.25% ≥ 98% and < 100% 45.00% ≥ 100% and < 101%5 55.00% ≥ 101% and < 103% 65.00% ≥ 103% and < 105% 75.00% ≥ 105% and < 107% 85.00% ≥ 107% and < 110% 100.00% ≥ 110% 5 The target objective (i.e., at 100% ofthe revenue and operating income target).

 
**3. Other Executives:**         **Performance Relative To Revenue Target and****Percentage** **Operating Income Target at that Level of Revenue****of Base** **(in accordance with the Company’s internal****Salary** **operating plan)**      0.00% < 95% 26.25% ≥ 95% and < 98% 29.75% ≥ 98% and < 100% 35.00% ≥ 100% and < 101%5 45.00% ≥ 101% and < 103% 55.00% ≥ 103% and < 105% 65.00% ≥ 105% and < 107% 75.00% ≥ 107% and < 110% 100.00% ≥ 110%**B.****EQUITY BONUS PLAN**Company executives will be eligible to participate in an equity pool of shares of common stock (inthe form of options). The size of the equity pool will be determined by the Compensation Committeein connection with the fiscal year-end review, based on the number of executives participating, thecumulative achievement of quarterly revenue and operating margin targets within the fiscal year andother factors. The Compensation Committee will determine the maximum number of shares to beallocated to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and then the Compensation Committee, with inputfrom the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, will determine the allocation of the remainder of theshares among the rest of the executive team. Options will vest according to standard vesting termsover four years. 5 The target objective (i.e., at 100% of the revenue and operating income target).
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 250 (Friday, December 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78513-78514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9866]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Renegotiation Board Interest Rate; Prompt Interest Rate; Contract 
Disputes Act

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: For the period beginning January 1, 2007, and ending on June 
30, 2007, the prompt payment interest rate is 5\1/4\ per centum per 
annum.

DATES: This notice announces the applicable interest rate for the 
January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2007, period.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may be mailed to Crystal Hanna, Senior 
Advisor, Borrowings Accounting Team,

[[Page 78514]]

Division of Accounting Operations, Office of Public Debt Accounting, 
Bureau of the Public Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328. A 
copy of this Notice will be available to download from http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Brown, Director, Division of 
Accounting Operations, Office of Public Debt Accounting, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328, (304) 480-5181; 
Crystal Hanna, Senior Advisor, Borrowings Accounting Team, Division of 
Accounting Operations, Office of Public Debt Accounting, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328, (304) 480-7488; 
Amy Mertz Brown, Deputy Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, 
Bureau of the Public Debt, (202) 504-3715; or Brenda L. Hoffman, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Chief Counsel, Bureau of the Public 
Debt, (202) 504-3706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Although the Renegotiation Board is no 
longer in existence, other Federal Agencies are required to use 
interest rates computed under the criteria established by the 
Renegotiation Act of 1971 Sec. 2, Pub. L. 92-41, 85 Stat. 97. For 
example, the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, Sec. 12, Pub. L. 95-563, 92 
Stat. 2389, and, indirectly, the Prompt Payment Act of 1982, 31 U.S.C. 
3902(a), provide for the calculation of interest due on claims at a 
rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury for the Renegotiation 
Board under Pub. L. 92-41.
    Therefore, notice is given that the Secretary of the Treasury has 
determined that the rate of interest applicable, for the period 
beginning January 1, 2007, and ending on June 30, 2007, at 5\1/4\ per 
centum per annum. This rate is determined pursuant to the above-
mentioned sections for the purpose of said sections.

    Dated: December 21, 2006.
Donald V. Hammond,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9866 Filed 12-21-06; 10:32 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-M