alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

                        Information on the hearing may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at                         *cdown@opic.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OPIC is a U.S. Government agency which provides, on a commercial basis, political risk insurance and financing in friendly developing countries and emerging democracies for environmentally sound projects which confer positive developmental benefits upon the project country while creating employment in the U.S. OPIC is required by section 231A(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (``the Act'') to hold at least one public hearing each year.

Dated: December 20, 2006.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9850 Filed 12-20-06; 11:30 am]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp.
(First Place) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of First Place, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Place.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|February 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Steven R. Lewis               
|                  |  |  |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



21
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF U. S. LABORATORIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE  MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         529,683
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,346,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (571,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    719,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,355,203
<PP&E>                                         2,858,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,199,548)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,002,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,393,459
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32,010
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,116,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,002,270
<SALES>                                        6,930,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,930,138
<CGS>                                          3,790,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,197,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (66,393)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                675,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                   293,215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            675,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   382,395
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .12


</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                transition report of the Company for the six-month period ended June                30,                2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this                date                (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: January                28, 2008 |  By:                              |  /s/                William E. Schloth |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             | William                E. Schloth      |
|                                             | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
(ORDER LIST: 585 U.S.) 

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 

ORDER IN PENDING CASE 

18A274 CROSSROADS V. CREW, ET AL. 

The application for stay, presented to The Chief Justice 

and by him referred to the Court, is denied. The order heretofore 

entered by The Chief Justice is vacated.
July 18, 2014 

Memorandum 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

July 16, 2014 Teleconference Between the National Tribal Air 

Association (NTAA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Outreach 

Chris Stoneman

and Information 

, Policy Advisor

Division, 

CL ~ 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 

Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the main discussion 

points made at the subject meeting during the comment period for the proposed 

rule: "General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source 

Review Program in Indian Country." (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014) 

Teleconference details: 

When: July 16, 2014; 2:30- 4:00pm ET 

Participants: Chris Stoneman, EPA, OAQPS 

Toni Colon, EPA, OAQPS 

Lisa Beckham, EPA, Region 9 

Geoffrey Glass, EPA, Region 9 

Minnie Grant, Ute Indian Tribe 

Kevin Greenleaf, Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 

Ben Foxx, Pedro Bay Village Council 

Alex Cabillo, Hualapai Tribe 

Tom Shepard, Little River Band of Ottawa Indians 

Ryan Eberle, Gila River Indian Country 

Greg Little, Inter Tribal Council of Arizona 

Brandy Toft, Leech Lack Band of Ojibwe 

Dejene Alemayehu, Kaw Nation 

Charlie Lippert, Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe 

Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA 

Andrea Boyer, Nez Perce Tribe 

To start the teleconference, EPA provided an overview of the EPA effort underway 

to issue general permits/permits by rule for true minor sources in Indian country, 

including the latest Bundle #2 proposal. Following the general overview, EPA went 

through in detail the proposed general permits for engines (spark ignition and 

compression ignition), boilers and sawmill facilities. 

Tribal participants raised several questions as follows: 
• Sawmill Facilities General Permit- how to handle board foot compliance 

·prior to 12 months for a 12-month, rolling totaiboard foot fim it; 

• Setback requirements- asked for clarification on what "nearby property" 

means; 

• Boilers- suggested moving up conditions 19, 20, and 23 to avoid them being 

overlooked; and 

• Existing minor sources in Indian country- asked for clarification on whether 

these sources are required to obtain permits. 

The EPA answered basic questions about what the proposed Bundle #2 rule 

contains and took some of the questions received as comments. 

This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the proposed rule and will be 

available for public review.
§ 286.200 How will we determine if Tribal Family Assistance Grant funds were misused or intentionally misused? ( a ) We will use the single audit or Federal review or audit to determine if a Tribe should be penalized for misusing Tribal Family Assistance Grant funds under § 286.195(a)(1) or intentionally misusing Tribal Family Assistance Grant funds under § 286.195(a)(2).
( b ) If a Tribe uses the TFAG in violation of the provisions of the Act, the provisions of 45 CFR part 75, or any Federal statutes and regulations applicable to the TANF program, we will consider the funds to have been misused.
( c ) The Tribe must show, to our satisfaction, that it used the funds for purposes that a reasonable person would consider to be within the purposes of the TANF program (as specified at § 286.35) and the provisions listed in § 286.45.
( d ) We will consider the TFAG to have been intentionally misused under the following conditions: ( 1 ) There is supporting documentation, such as Federal guidance or policy instructions, indicating that TANF funds could not be used for that purpose; or
( 2 ) After notification that we have determined such use to be improper, the Tribe continues to use the funds in the same or similarly improper manner.
( e ) If the single audit determines that a Tribe misused Federal funds in applying the negotiated time limit provisions under § 286.115, the amount of the penalty for misuse will be limited to five percent of the TFAG amount. ( 1 ) This penalty shall be in addition to the reduction specified under § 286.195(a)(1).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[65 FR 8530, Feb. 18, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 3020, Jan. 20, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Steven R. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|February 7, 2007 |  | /s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|                 |  | Steven R. Lewis                      
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 2540.110 Limitation on use of Corporation funds for administrative costs. ( a ) ( 1 ) Not more than five percent of the grant funds provided under 45 CFR 2516, 2517, 2519, and 2521 for any fiscal year may be used to pay for administrative costs, as defined in § 2510.20 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The distribution of administrative costs between the grant and any subgrant will be subject to the approval of the Corporation.
( 3 ) In applying the limitation on administrative costs the Corporation will approve one of the following methods in the award document: ( i ) Limit the amount or rate of indirect costs that may be paid with Corporation funds under a grant or subgrant to five percent of total Corporation funds expended, provided that— ( A ) Organizations that have an established indirect cost rate for Federal awards will be limited to this method; and
( B ) Unreimbursed indirect costs may be applied to meeting operational matching requirements under the Corporation's award;
( ii ) Specify that a fixed rate of five percent or less (not subject to supporting cost documentation) of total Corporation funds expended may be used to pay for administrative costs, provided that the fixed rate is in conjunction with an overall 15 percent administrative cost factor to be used for organizations that do not have established indirect cost rates; or
( iii ) Utilize such other method that the Corporation determines in writing is consistent with OMB guidance and other applicable requirements, helps minimize the burden on grantees or subgrantees, and is beneficial to grantees or subgrantees and the Federal Government.
( b ) Costs attributable to administrative functions as well as program functions should be prorated between administrative costs and program costs.
[63 FR 18138, Apr. 14, 1998]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 4

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER

61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

March 9, 2015

Ms. Myra Reece

Bureau Chief Environmental Quality Control South Carolina Department of

Health and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Dear Ms. Reece:

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency’s FY 2014 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This repor t outlines your agency’s various grant commitments

and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary your report is now finalized. This letter documents the conclusion of the join t evaluation process require d by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2014 Air Planning Agreement under Cross Cutting Issues.

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2014 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to protect and improve air quality. If you have any qu estions regarding your gran t, please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Gwendolyn Gr af at (404) 562-9289.

Sincerely,

Beverly H. Banister Director,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division

Enclosure
October 24, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALI YAZDCHI, Appellant

NO. 14-17-00462-CV V.

KENNETH MINGLEDORFF AKA MINGLEDORFF LAW FIRM, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on March 6, 2017. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc.
      (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
      /s/DAVID B. MCWILLIAMS


David
      B.
      McWilliams


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      November 29, 2007
#### George T. McGowan, an Infant, by Mary T. McGowan, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

*McGowan*v. *Brie B. B. Go.,*128 App. Div. 907, appeal dismissed.

(Argued January 4, 1909;

decided January 12, 1909.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 9, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The motion was made upon the ground of failure to perfect the appeal.

*Charles W. Strong*for motion.

*Richmond Moot*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
§ 2556.715 What political activities may a VISTA participate in? ( a ) Provided that paragraph (b) of this section is fully adhered to, a VISTA may: ( 1 ) Express their opinion privately and publicly on political subjects;
( 2 ) Be politically active in connection with a question that is not specifically identified with a political party, such as a constitutional amendment, referendum, approval of a municipal ordinance, or any other question or issue of similar character;
( 3 ) Participate in the nonpartisan activities of a civic, community, social, labor, professional, or similar organization; and
( 4 ) Participate fully in public affairs, except as prohibited by other Federal law, in a manner that does not compromise their efficiency or integrity as a VISTA, or compromise the neutrality, efficiency, or integrity of AmeriCorps or the VISTA program.
( b ) A VISTA may participate in political activities set forth in paragraph (a) of this section as long as such participation: ( 1 ) Does not interfere with the performance of, or availability to perform, their assigned VISTA project duties;
( 2 ) Does not interfere with their provision of service in the VISTA program;
( 3 ) Does not involve any use of VISTA assistance, resources or funds;
( 4 ) Would not result in the identification of the VISTA as being a participant in or otherwise associated with the VISTA program;
( 5 ) Is not conducted during scheduled VISTA service hours; and
( 6 ) Does not interfere with the full-time commitment to remain available for VISTA service without regard to regular working hours, at all times during periods of service, except for authorized periods of leave.
§ 9.84 Existing conditions and proposed area of operations. ( a ) You must submit to-scale maps that clearly depict: ( 1 ) The boundaries of your oil or gas rights in relation to your proposed operations and the relevant System unit boundary;
( 2 ) The natural features, including, but not limited, to streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, seepage areas, springs, shallow water aquifers, topographic relief, and areas we have indicated to you as environmentally sensitive;
( 3 ) The locations of existing roads, trails, railroad tracks, pads, and other disturbed areas; and
( 4 ) The locations of existing structures that your operations could affect, including but not limited to: Buildings, pipelines, existing or permitted oil or gas wells, freshwater wells, underground and overhead electrical lines, and other utility lines.
( b ) You must submit the following information about geologic conditions in their natural state and under the proposed operating conditions: ( 1 ) Estimated depths and names of known zones of usable water, brine, hydrocarbon, geothermal, or other mineral-bearing zones based on the best available information;
( 2 ) Potential hazards to persons and the environment such as known abnormal pressure zones, lost circulation zones, hydrogen sulfide gas, or karst formations; and
( 3 ) Nature, extent, and depth (if known) of near-surface bedrock fracturing or jointing relative to proposed cemented surface casing-seat depth and any open annular interval proposed in the well design.
( c ) You must submit the following information for any new surface disturbances or construction: ( 1 ) Maps depicting the proposed area of operations, boundaries of new surface disturbances and proposed access routes;
( 2 ) Maps depicting the proposed location of all support facilities, including those for transportation (*e.g.,* vehicle parking areas, airstrips, helicopter pads), sanitation, occupation, staging areas, fuel dumps, refueling areas, loading docks, water supplies, and disposal facilities;
( 3 ) The methods and diagrams, including cross-sections, of any proposed pad construction, road construction, cut-and-fill areas, and surface maintenance, including erosion control;
( 4 ) The number and types of equipment and vehicles, including an estimate of vehicular trips, associated with each phase of your operation;
( 5 ) An estimated time to complete each phase of the proposed operations, including any operational timing constraints;
( 6 ) The type and extent of security measures proposed within your area of operations;
( 7 ) The power sources and their transmission systems for the proposed operations; and
( 8 ) The types and quantities of all solid and liquid waste generation and the proposed methods of storage, handling, and off-site disposal.