alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

SkyViewHD®, 250 International Parkway, Suite 250, Lake Mary, FL 32746

Phone: 407-430-2271│www.skyviewhd.com

GPS Development, LLC

d/b/a SkyViewHD®

250 International Parkway

Suite 250

Lake Mary, FL 32746

March 12, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemptions No. 11399 and 11399-A

Dear Sir/Madam:

On April 20, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) granted GPS 

Development, LLC d/b/a SkyViewHD® (“SkyViewHD”) with an exemption from the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) - Exemption No. 11399, Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–

0147. 

On July 10, 2015, the FAA granted an amendment to Exemption No. 11399 which added

additional Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“UAS”) to the list of aircraft SkyViewHD is 

permitted to fly - Exemption No. 11399A.

In this new petition for amendment, SkyViewHD requests the opportunity to operate two 

additional UASs for commercial purposes - the senseFly eBee Ag and the 3DR Solo. These 

UASs operate at or beyond the operational parameters of the UASs SkyViewHD is presently 

permitted to fly for commercial purposes. These additional UASs offer exceptional flight safety 

characteristics and will be operated utilizing the same safety procedures SkyViewHD utilizes in 

its present UAS operations. The user manuals for the senseFly eBee Ag and 3DR Solo have been 

separately uploaded via the portal.

SkyViewHD will continue to comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed 

in Exemption 11399 and 11399-A except that SkyViewHD will permitted to additionally fly the 

senseFly eBee Ag and 3DR Solo UAS for commercial purposes. Other than the addition of these 
2

SkyViewHD®, 250 International Parkway, Suite 250, Lake Mary, FL 32746

Phone: 407-430-2271│www.skyviewhd.com

UASs, there will be no change in the conditions and procedures relative to SkyViewHD’s 

operation of its UASs and the continued emphasis on public safety which were the basis for the 

initial grant(s) of exemption.

Due to the fact that the requested amendment includes UASs which have already been 

approved in numerous grants of exemptions by the FAA and will not set any precedent or 

otherwise raise any new issues, SkyViewHD respectfully requests the FAA to determine good 

cause exists to grant the requested amendment.

SkyViewHD respectfully requests the FAA grant an amendment to the prior exemption as 

noted herein.

Respectfully submitted,

Philip A. K. Stiles, Esq.

President and General Counsel

GPS Development, LLC d/b/a SkyViewHD
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23935]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8904]

In the Matter of the Designation of Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-
Ansar, Also Known as Katiba al-Muhajireen, Also Known as Jaish al-
Muhajireen wa Ansar, Also Known as Kateeb al Muhajireen wal Ansar, Also 
Known as Brigade of the Emigrants and Helpers, Also Known as Army of 
the Emigrants and Helpers, Also Known as Jaysh al-Muhajirin wal-Ansar, 
Also Known as Jaysh al-Muhajirin and al-Ansar Army, Also Known as Al-
Muhajirin Brigade, Also Known as Muhajirin and Ansar Army, Also Known 
as Army of Foreign Fighters and Supporters as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Jaish al-
Muhajireen wal-Ansar, also known as Katiba al-Muhajireen, also known as 
Jaish al-Muhajireen wa Ansar, also known as Kateeb al Muhajireen wal 
Ansar, also known as Brigade of the Emigrants and Helpers, also known 
as Army of the Emigrants and Helpers, also known as Jaysh al-Muhajirin 
wal-Ansar, also known as Jaysh al-Muhajirin and al-Ansar Army, also 
known as Al-Muhajirin Brigade, also known as Muhajirin and Ansar Army, 
also known as Army of Foreign Fighters and Supporters, committed, or 
poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten 
the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign 
policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 23, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-23935 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Category Primary 

Estimate

Low 

Estimate

High 

Estimate

Year 

Dollar

Discount 

Rate

Period 

Covered

Benefits

$390 $940 2008 7% 2016

$420 $1,000 2008 3% 2016

7%

3%

Qualitative

Costs

$270 2008 7% 2015

$270 2008 3% 2015

7%

3%

Qualitative

Transfers

7%

3%

From/To From: To:

7%

3%

From/To From: To:

Effects

State, Local, and/or 

Tribal Government

Small Business Of the five small entities screened, one will have costs of more than 3% of revenues or sales. We have determined that there will not be a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities (or SISNOSE). Impact results are available in the RIA. 

Wages

Growth

No estimates available regarding changes in wages. 

No estimates available regarding changes in growth. 

Other Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

None estimated. 

Federal Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annualized 

Quantified 

Annualized 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annualized 

Quantified 

Notes

Estimates Units

Decrease in headaches, eye irritation, and pnemonia due to reduced HAP exposure

This benefits range reflects two primary estimates (Pope et al. for the lower, and Laden et al. for the higher). Monetized benefits for this NESHAP reflect the direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor 

emission reductions. There are no monetized benefits available for reductions in HAPs or CO, ecosystem effects, or visibility impairment. Analysis year is the year of full rule implementation 

(2013). Results and methodology are provided in the RIA. 

None estimated.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

END CITIZENS UNITED PAC,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No. 21-1665 (TJK)

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that End Citizens United PAC, Plaintiff in the above-captioned case, 

appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from this Court’s 

Order and Memorandum (ECF Nos. 11, 12) entered April 18, 2022, denying Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Default Judgment and dismissing this case.

Dated: June 16, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kevin P. Hancock

Adav Noti (D.C. Bar No. 490714)

Kevin P. Hancock*

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER ACTION

1101 14th Street NW, Ste. 400

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 736-2200

anoti@campaignlegalcenter.org

khancock@campaignlegalcenter.org

Counsel for Plaintiff End Citizens United PAC

* Admitted pro hac vice. Barred in the State of 

New York. Not admitted to the D.C. Bar. 

Practicing under the supervision of Adav Noti, 

member of the D.C. Bar.

Case 1:21-cv-01665-TJK Document 13 Filed 06/16/22 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50423 Conference Calendar

JUAN J. SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FRED BIERY, United States District Judge; ROBERT O’CONNOR, United States Magistrate, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Western District of Texas, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-98-196

- - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan J. Sanchez, Texas prisoner # 577512, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), arguing that the district court erred in dismissing his civil rights complaint against a federal district court judge and a magistrate judge seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in the form of the reinstatement of his habeas corpus petition.No. 98-50423 -2- By moving for IFP, Sanchez is challenging the district court’s certification decision that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Sanchez is not entitled to collaterally attack the dismissal of his habeas petitions by filing a civil rights action. See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Sanchez has failed to raise an issue of arguable merit. Because Sanchez has failed to show that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Sanchez’s appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Sanchez’s complaint and this court’s dismissal of his appeal for frivolousness count as a third and fourth strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Sanchez has accumulated two strikes prior to this appeal. See Sanchez v. Putska , No. 95-20917 (5th Cir. March 1, 1996); Sanchez

v. T. West , No. 97-40940 (5th Cir. June 16, 1998). Therefore, Sanchez may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. SANCTION IMPOSED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
## ***Exhibit 32.1***

## * *

## ***CERTIFICATION***

## * *

CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dominic Ng, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

 

(a)          the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)         the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  August 10,2009

 
|   | /s/  DOMINIC NG                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Dominic  Ng                                   |
|   | President &  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

IntheMatterof

Rightmarch.com PAC, Inc.

 ) 

) LRA 842 

 ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, recording secretaiy for the Federal Election Commission executive 

session on April 05,2011, do hereby certify that the Commission failed on a vote of 3-3 to 

approve the General Counsel's recommendation as set forth in the memorandum dated March 14, 

2011 on the subject of the Request for Consideration of Legal Questions Arising in the Audit of 

Rightmarch PAC, Inc. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for tfae motion. 

Commissioners Hunter, McGahn II, and Petersen dissented. 

Attest: 

^^^ ^ Date * Shelley E.Gs 

Deputy Secretaiy of the Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                 1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          3,221
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          5,881
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                3,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    57,164
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         73,340
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           73,297
<LOANS>                                       189,268
<ALLOWANCE>                                       989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                288,671
<DEPOSITS>                                    220,467
<SHORT-TERM>                                   20,350
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,288
<LONG-TERM>                                    19,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          318
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                288,671
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 9,649
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               3,675
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  481
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               13,805
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              7,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,432
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           4,373
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      65
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   803
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      740
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        60
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  924
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 989
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENT TO APPELLATE COURT PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : NO. 267 APPELLATE COURT RULES DOCKET

**OR D**  **ER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW** , this 12 th day of April, 2017, Carrie L. Allman, Esquire, Montgomery County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years , commencing July 1, 2017.
No. 2704.

#### Henry Borders *v.*The State.

1. Gaming.—It is no offense against the laws of this State to bet or wager at a game played with dice or dominoes át a private residence.

2. Same—Evidence—Charge of the Court—Fact Case.—The evidence in this ease showed that the house in which the playing was done was a private residence, but that it had been frequently resorted to for the purpose of gaming. Under this evidence, the trial court instructed the jury that, if the said house was “used commonly and exclusively for the purpose of gaming, defendant would be guilty, even though the house was a private residence.” *Held,*that the instruction was erroneous; and that, as the evidence shows that the house was a private residence, it does not support the conviction.

Appeal from the County Court of Ellis. Tried below before the Hon. B. McDaniel, County Judge.

The opinion sufficiently discloses the case. The penalty assessed was a fine of ten dollars.

*JE. P, Anderson,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

It is not an offense against the law to bet or wager at a game played with dice or dominoes at a private residence. (Willson’s Texas Crim. Laws, secs. 592-595.) In this case the evidence shows that the game bet at was played at a private residence. There was evidence showing that said resi*334deuce had frequently been resorted to before the playing for which defendant was prosecuted, for the purpose of gaming. •

Opinion delivered November 23, 1887.

In his charge to the jury the trial judge instructed that if the house where the playing occurred was “used commonly and exclusively for gaming, the defendant would be guilty, even though said house was ostensibly a private residence.” This charge was excepted to by the defendant at the time of the trial, be.cause not warranted by the evidence. We think said charge wd's erroneous, and we are also of the opinion that the cónviction is not sustained by the evidence, the playing and betting having occurred at a private residence.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
§ 2551.34 What are the rules on suspension, termination, and denial of refunding of grants? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) The Chief Executive Officer or designee is authorized to suspend further payments or to terminate payments under any grant providing assistance under the Act whenever he/she determines there is a material failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions of the grant. The Chief Executive Officer shall prescribe procedures to insure that: ( 1 ) Assistance under the Act shall not be suspended for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions, except in emergency situations for thirty days;
( 2 ) An application for refunding under the Act may not be denied unless the recipient has been given: ( i ) Notice at least 75 days before the denial of such application of the possibility of such denial and the grounds for any such denial; and
( ii ) Opportunity to show cause why such action should not be taken;
( 3 ) In any case where an application for refunding is denied for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant, the recipient shall be afforded an opportunity for an informal hearing before an impartial hearing officer, who has been agreed to by the recipient and CNCS; and
( 4 ) Assistance under the Act shall not be terminated for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions unless the recipient has been afforded reasonable notice and opportunity for a full and fair hearing.
( b ) Hearings or other meetings as may be necessary to fulfill the requirements of this section should, to the extent practicable, be held in locations convenient to the recipient agency.
( c ) The procedures for suspension, termination, and denial of refunding, that apply to the Senior Companion Program are specified in 45 CFR Part 1206.
[64 FR 14115, Mar. 24, 1999. Redesignated at 72 FR 48583, Aug. 24, 2007; 83 FR 64645, Dec. 17, 2018]
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

66) IV-C-32 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:54 AM Sheet 66 of 232 
**&ST<r) 

S 

\ SE 

* t PRO* * 

^ 

P.2 

A-87 --U 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JAN 15 WB 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Doug Barnard, Jr. 

House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Barnard: 

Thank you for your comments concerning EPA's proposal to 

require onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured that 

your comments will be considered in the next phase of our 

rulemaking. We will also be placing them in the public docket 

for the Rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely your; 

Director 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

ir<tyjr. wiieon 

:ice of Mobile Sources
H|S|M 

Law Offices of Heather Sidwell Morris, P.A. 

February 13,2014 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director, Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Dear Mr. Hintermister: 

We are in receipt of the Preliminary Audit Report ("PAR") regarding the activities of the 

Committee on Arrangements for the 2012 Republican National Convention ("COA"). 

The following represents the response of COA to the findings and recommendations of the Audit 

staff contained in the PAR. 

Finding 1. Net Outstandins Convention Expenses 

COA does not dispute the Net Outstanding Convention Expenses ("NOCE") calculations as 

prepared by Audit staff through October 31,2013. COA has provided Audit staff with additional 

information to update the NOCE calculations and will continue to update the staff on a monthly 

basis. Also, as a convenience, COA has included with this response an updated NOCE statement 

as of January 31, 2014. 

Finding 2. Failure to Itemize Debts 

Although COA disagrees with the basis for a finding regarding the itemization of debts, it 

nevertheless has complied with Audit staffs recommendations by filing amended reports to 

reflect the activity at issue. The amended reports were filed earlier this week. As a result, we 

trust that no further action will be taken by the Commission on this matter. 

Respectfully, 

Heather Sidwell Morris 

Counsel to the Committee on Arrangements 

for the 2012 Republican National Convention 

Enclosure 

PC. Box 173207 | Tampa, FL 33672 

202-680-88331 www.hsmcounsel.com