alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cybermesh International Corp. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Locksley Samuels, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|

/s/ Locksley SamuelsLocksley SamuelsPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer andDirectorDate: September 14, 2009

---
Orlando Antwonie Harris  From the County Court at Law No. 2 Appellant of Potter County v. 07-04-00505-CR  January 13, 2006 The State of Texas  Opinion by Justice Reavis Appellee JUDGMENT Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated January 13, 2006, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that part of the judgment suspendi ng payment of the $1,000 fine in favor of two years community supervi sion is reversed and judgment is hereby rendered that appellant’s punishment stands at a $1,000 fine; in all other respects the judgment is affirmed. Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those which may have been paid are adjudged. It is further ordered that this decis ion be certified below for observance. o O o
August 8, 2016

Mr. Wesley B. Mendoza

WM Aerial Innovations 6100 Rocky Canyon Road
Atascadero

, CA 93422

Re: FAA

– 2015

– 4843

Dear Mr. Mendoza :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
# PAC Table 4c

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 9/7/23.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 74559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9645]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Systemic Initiative

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 13, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open SystemC Initiative 
(``OSCI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Actis Design, LLC, Portland, OR; Broadcom Corporation, 
Bristol, United Kingdom; Denali Software, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; 
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Herzelia, Israel; NEC Corporation, 
Kawasaki, Japan; SpringSoft, Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan; and Vast Systems, 
Inc., Sunnyvale, CA have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OSCI intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 27, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2006 (71 FR 15218).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9645 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 2551.72 Is a written volunteer assignment plan required for each Senior Companion? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) All Senior Companions performing direct services to individual clients in home settings and individual clients in community-based settings, shall receive a written volunteer assignment plan developed by the volunteer station that: ( 1 ) Is approved by the sponsor and accepted by the Senior Companion;
( 2 ) Identifies the client(s) to be served;
( 3 ) Identifies the role and activities of the Senior Companion and expected outcomes for the client(s);
( 4 ) Addresses the period of time each client is expected to receive such services; and
( 5 ) Is used to review the impact of the assignment on the client(s).
( b ) [Reserved]
[67 FR 60999, Sept. 27, 2002, as amended at 83 FR 64647, Dec. 17, 2018]
§ 2552.62 What are the responsibilities of a volunteer station? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
A volunteer station shall undertake the following responsibilities in support of Foster Grandparent volunteers: ( a ) Develop volunteer assignments that meet the requirements specified in §§ 2552.71 through 2552.72 and regularly assess those assignments for continued appropriateness.
( b ) Select eligible children for assigned volunteers.
( c ) Develop a written volunteer assignment plan for each Foster Grandparent that identifies their roles and activities, each child served, and expected outcomes.
( d ) Keep a Letter of Agreement for each child who receives in-home service.
( e ) Provide Foster Grandparents serving the station with: ( 1 ) Orientation to the station and any in-service training necessary to enhance performance of assignments; and
( 2 ) Resources required for performance of assignments, including reasonable accommodation, as needed, to enable Foster Grandparents with disabilities to perform the essential functions of their service; and
( f ) Designate a staff member to oversee fulfillment of station responsibilities and supervision of Foster Grandparents while on assignment.
( g ) Keep records and prepare reports required by the sponsor.
( h ) Provide for the safety of Foster Grandparents assigned to it.
( i ) Comply with all applicable civil rights laws and regulations, including providing Foster Grandparents with disabilities reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential functions of their service.
( j ) Undertake such other responsibilities as may be necessary for the successful performance of Foster Grandparents in their assignments or as agreed to in the Memorandum of Understanding.
[64 FR 14126, Mar. 24, 1999, as amended at 83 FR 64652, Dec. 17, 2018]
# 2003 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
1Hunt, JeffFrom:Hunt, JeffSent:Friday, August 23, 2013 2:11 PMTo:AQComments@ecy.wa.govSubject:Comment on proposed rule langage for Chapter 173-476 WACAttachments:draft review_NAAQS update_letter.pdfAlthoughitisaveryminorchange,theEPAhasdeterminedthattheChapter173‐476rulelanguageregardingEcology’stwenty‐fourhoursulfurdioxidestandardwouldnotbeapprovableintotheSIPinitscurrentform.ForafulldiscussionoftheEPA’sreviewpleaseseetheattachedAugust23,2013letterfromKateKelly,DirectoroftheEPARegion10OfficeofAir,Waste,andToxicstoStuClark,EcologyAirQualityProgramManager.IfyouhaveanyquestionsabouttheEPA’scommentontheChapter173‐476rulelanguagepleasefeelfreetocontactme.Thankyou.JeffHuntAirQualityPlannerEPARegion10OfficeofAir,WasteandToxics(206)553‐0256
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, T Cell Tolerance.
    Date: February 21, 2006.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, 3121, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Paul A. Amstad, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 402-7098, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4636272b3532272206282f272f2268282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b7b6a66787f6a6f4b65626a626f25656263256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transportation Research; 93.856; 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-916 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 284.15 Who must submit information to ACF to carry out the requirements of this part? ( a ) The Chief Executive Officer of the State, or his or her designee, is responsible for submitting to ACF the information required by this part.
( b ) The State should obtain information from and work with the Indian tribe(s) (and Tribal consortia) operating a Tribal TANF program in the State in preparing and submitting the assessment, as specified in § 284.30, and the corrective action plan, as specified in § 284.45.
# 6PPI--a0p3-DDI2- 

# a PONT

May 2, 2011 

# .,c I f MAY I ? AN 9: 32

Document Control Office US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics EPAEast Room 6428 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 p. 1 

# mle-07 

# 3353~6

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works Deepwater, NJ 08023 

# RENJuN Q2 2011

Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT - 2003 - 0012 DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No
. NJ0005100 PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples January 2011 Sample Data Dear Document Control Office: As per Part IV, Section G .5.a ofthe NJPDES permit, we are submitting a summary of PFOA analytical results for the weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A to NJDEP on a monthly basis
. Per your request, we are sending you a paper and electronic copy ofthe report for samples taken during January 2011
. We will continue to send you the reports each month
. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (856) 540-3015
. Sincerely,

Joe Greenfield SHE Consultant - Environmental DuPont Chambers Works Enclosures



## CONTAINS NOCS1Copies to:

Director, Chemical Control Division US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics EPA East Room 4146 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Ms
. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) Principal Environmental Engineer NJDEP Division ofWater Quality Bureau of Point Source Permitting - Region 2 401 E
. State Street P.O
. Box 029 Trenton, NJ 08625-0029
#### In the Matter of the Application of The Sea Beach Railway Company, Respondent, to Compel Payment of an Award. The Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.

*Matter of Sea Beach Railway Go.,*121 App. Div. 907, affirmed.

(Argued October 11, 1909 ;

decided October 26, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 4, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing payment of certain awards theretofore made in street opening proceedings.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (James F. Quigley*of counsel), for appellant.

*J). A. Marsh*and *George D. Yeomans*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
#### § 2552.114 What happens if a non-CNCS funded sponsor does not comply with the NGA?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544, Aug. 30, 2024.

A non-CNCS funded project sponsor's noncompliance with the NGA may result in suspension or termination CNCS' agreement and all benefits specified in § 2552.112.

[83 FR 64653, Dec. 17, 2018]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2754] 

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by February 23, 2006. See § 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. 

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Cambridge, Newark, St. Michaels, and Stockton, Maryland and Chincoteague, Virginia) (MM Docket No. 04-20).                 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-971 Filed 2-7-06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### American Fruit Product Company, Appellant, *v.*John G. Ward, Respondent.

(Argued January 6, 1908;

decided January 9, 1908.)

Motion for reargument denied, with leave to renew, provided that upon application made to the Appellate Division to that, end, the record shall be so amended as to show that exceptions to the report of the referee were duly filed and served. (See 190 N. Y. 533).
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jack Abramov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and  Pauline Schneider, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 22, 2006



/s/  Jack Abramov

Jack Abramov

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Pauline Schneider

Pauline Schneider

Chief Financial Officer
#### People *ex rel.*Tarr *et al.*v. Weaver, commissioner, etc.

*Certiorari to Commissioner of Highways.*

A commissioner of highways made an order denying an application for a road. An appeal was taken, and referees were appointed, who reversed the order of the commissioner and laid out the road. A *certiorari*was then issued, directed to the commissioner only, to review the proceedings had before him previous to the appeal, on the ground that he had no jurisdiction, because one of the persons who signed the certificate required by the statute (1 E. S. 514, § 58) was not a freeholder. *Held,*that the writ brought up for review nothing except the proceedings of the commissioner, that ¿the question whether he acted without having acquired jurisdiction was not properly before the court.

*Held,*also, that the order of the commissioner having been regularly reversed, it had ceased to have any force or effect. That the question whether he acquired jurisdiction to make the order was no longer material except as it affected the question of the jurisdiction of the referees, which could not be determined in a proceeding to which they were not parties.

Certiorari to review the decision of the respondent, as commissioner of highways, refusing to lay out a highway.

*J. C. Record,*for the relator.

*Julius A. Parsons,*for respondent.

Gilbert, J.

The head-note states all that is important in the opinion.

*Certiorari quashed.*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1543 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a tax on bonuses 

received from companies receiving TARP funds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2009 

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose 

a tax on bonuses received from companies receiving 

TARP funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TAX ON BONUSES RECEIVED FROM COMPANIES 

4 RECEIVING TARP FUNDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter A of chapter 1 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new part: 

8 ‘‘PART VIII—BONUSES RECEIVED FROM 

9 COMPANIES RECEIVING TARP FUNDS 

‘‘Sec. 59C. Bonuses received from companies receiving TARP funds. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1543 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 59C. BONUSES RECEIVED FROM COMPANIES RECEIV2 ING TARP FUNDS. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employee or 

4 former employee of a TARP recipient, there is hereby im5 posed (in addition to any other tax imposed by this sub6 title) a tax on any bonus received by the taxpayer during 

7 the taxable year from such TARP recipient equal to 95 

8 percent of amount of such bonus. 

9 ‘‘(b) TARP RECIPIENT.—For purposes of this sec10 tion— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘TARP recipient’ 

12 means any person who receives funds under title I 

13 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

14 2008. 

15 ‘‘(2) PERIOD OF TREATMENT.—A person shall 

16 be treated as a TARP recipient during the period 

17 beginning on the date that such person first receives 

18 the funds referred to in paragraph (1) and ending 

19 on the date that all such funds have been repaid to 

20 the Federal Government. 

21 ‘‘(c) SPECIAL RULES.— 

22 ‘‘(1) REIMBURSEMENT OF TAX TREATED AS A

23 BONUS.—Any reimbursement by a TARP recipient 

24 of the tax imposed under this section shall be treat25 ed in the same manner as the payment of a bonus 

26 to the taxpayer liable for such tax. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1543 IH

1 ‘‘(2) EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME.—Any 

2 bonus with respect to which tax is imposed under 

3 subsection (a) shall not be includible in the gross in4 come of the taxpayer. 

5 ‘‘(d) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

6 such regulations or other guidance as may be necessary 

7 or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of parts for 

9 subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by 

10 adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘PART VIII—BONUSES RECEIVED FROM COMPANIES RECEIVING TARP 

FUNDS’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to bonuses paid before, on, or after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS