alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Neare v. James, appellant.

*Lease—surety upon—counter-claim,.*

A guarantor of rent reserved in a lease, *held,*not discharged from, liability for a breach by the lessee by the failure of the lessor to perform the covenants in the lease on his part. Such failure, however, might furnish the, basis of a counter-claim, on the part of the guarantor, available in diminution of damages, as it grows out of the same transaction.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Charles Neare against Albert A. James upon a guaranty executed by the defendant upon a lease given by the plaintiff to one Dailey of a farm belonging to plaintiff.

*J. G. Record,*for appellant.

*Allen & Thrasher*and *D. H. Bolles,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The opinion reviews the facts and holds that the judgment should, be affirmed upon the grounds stated in the head-note. It is not believed necessary to give the opinion at length.

*Judgment affirmed.*
##### 



Exhibit 33.3
 ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING
CRITERIA
   Platform:
 Applicable Servicing Criteria:
 Period:
  
 
 
 1




---



##### 



The Bank of New York
    
    The Bank of New YorkThe Bank of New York Trust
    
    The Bank of New York TrustCompany, N.A.
    
    Company, N.A.The Bank of New York (Delaware)
 /s/ Robert L. Griffin
    
    
    
    /s/ Patrick J. TadieRobert L. Griffin
    
    
    
    Patrick J. TadieAuthorized Signer
    
    
    
    Authorized Signer
  2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the interim
condensed consolidated statement of Symposium Corporation as of and for the six
months ended June 30, 2000, included in this report on Form 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,480,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,195,900
<ALLOWANCES>                              (22,226,285)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,729,047
<PP&E>                                         406,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                (53,945)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,079,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,849,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,280,473
<PREFERRED>                                  1,997,811
<COMMON>                                        26,151
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,925,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,079,292
<SALES>                                     30,053,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,053,180
<CGS>                                       21,758,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,750,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,869,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   291,952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (465,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (32,332,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)


</TABLE>
• • . .

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

\\'ASHINCTON, D.C. 20463

..'

•-

•

A83-92

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

GENERAL TELEPHONE AND ELECTRONICS

CORPORATION GOOD GOVERNMENT CLUB

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of the General

Telephone and Electronics Corporation Good Government Club ("the

Committee"), undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal

Election Commission in accordance with the provisions of the

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Act").

The audit was conducted pursuant to Section 438(b) of Title 2 of

the United States Code which states, in part, that the Commission

may conduct audits and field investigations of any political committee required to file a report under section 434 of this

title. Prior to conducting any audit under this subsection, the

Commission shall perform an internal review of reports filed by

selected committees to determine if the reports filed by a

particular committee meet the threshold requirements for

substantial compliance with the Act.

. The Committee registered with the Federal Election

Commission on July 1, 1975 as the General Telephone and

Electronics Stamford Employees Good Government Club. On November

9, 1979, the Committee amended its statement of organization to

change its name to General Telephone and Electronics Good

Government Club. On May 20, 1980, the Committee amended its

statement of organization to change its name to General Telephone and Electronics Corporation Good Government Club. The Committee

maintains its headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut. .

The audit covered the period January 1, 1981 through December 31, 1982. The Committee reported a cash balance on

January 1, 1981 of $10,018.94; total receipts of $153,422.34;

total disbursements of $158,685.18; and a cash balance on

December 31, 1982 of $4,756.10 •
, --:,7----;-·---;-.----------------------------------_

-2-

-

o

"-

o

V

•

This audit report is based on documents and work papers which support each of its factual statenents. They form part of

the record upon which the Commission based its decisions on the

matters in the report and were available to the Commissioners and

appropriate staff for review. .

B. Key Personnel

The Treasurers of the Committee ouring the period covered by the audit were Mr. Marvin L. Myrick from January 1,

1981 through June 1, 1981J Ms. Gladys R. ~urphy from June 1, 1981

through October 19, 1982J and M&. Claire Donohue from October 19,

1982 through the close of the audit period.

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts and disbur$ements and individual transactionsJ

review of required supporting documentation; analysis of

Committee debts and obligationsJ and such other audit procedures

as deemed necessary under the circumstances.

II. Finding and Recommendation

Based upon examination of the reports and statements filed

and the records presented by the Committee, no material problems in complying with the Federal Election C~~pai9n Act were

discovered during the course of the audit.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
La Cortez Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Andres Gutierrez Rivera, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Andres Gutierrez RiveraName:
                    Andres
      Gutierrez RiveraTitle:
                    Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
                    April
      9, 2009
§ 2507.4 Agency FOIA officials. The following are AmeriCorps' authorized FOIA officials, each of whom will be identified on *americorps.gov*, and their roles. ( a ) The *Chief FOIA Officer:* ( 1 ) Has overall responsibility for AmeriCorps' compliance with the FOIA;
( 2 ) Provides high-level oversight and support to AmeriCorps' FOIA program;
( 3 ) Recommends adjustments to AmeriCorps' practices, personnel, and funding, as needed, to improve FOIA administration, including through Chief FOIA Officer Reports submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice;
( 4 ) Tells the Agency's FOIA Officers of all significant developments with respect to the FOIA;
( 5 ) Is responsible for offering training to agency staff regarding their FOIA responsibilities;
( 6 ) Serves as the primary liaison with the Office of Government Information Services and the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy; and
( 7 ) Reviews, at least annually, all aspects of AmeriCorps' administration of the FOIA to ensure compliance with the FOIA's requirements.
( b ) The *FOIA Officer* receives, tracks, and processes the Agency's FOIA requests, including making final release determinations. The FOIA Officer is responsible for program direction, original denials, and policy decisions required for effective implementation of the Agency's FOIA program.
( c ) The *FOIA Appeals Officer* receives and act upon appeals from requesters whose initial requests for the Agency's records have been denied, in whole or in part.
( d ) The *FOIA Public Liaison* serves as the official to whom a FOIA requester can raise concerns about the services received, following an initial response from the FOIA Officer. In addition, the FOIA Public Liaison assists, as appropriate, in reducing delays, increasing transparency, answering requesters' questions about the status of their requests, and resolving disputes.
[DATE]
 
   Re: Conexant Systems, Inc. Stock Option Award Grant Notice (2010 Equity Incentive Plan)
 Company Plan Participant Option
 Optionholder:Date of Grant:Vesting Commencement Date:Number of Shares Subject to Option:Exercise Price (Per Share):Total Exercise Price:Expiration Date:
 Type of Grant:
    
     ̈
Incentive Stock Option1
           ̈ Nonstatutory Stock OptionVesting Schedule:
    
    [1/4thof the shares vest one year after the Vesting Commencement Date; the balance of the shares vest in
a series of thirty-six (36) successive equal monthly installments measured from the first anniversary of the Vesting
Commencement Date.]Payment:
    
    By one or a combination of the following items (described in the Option Agreement):þ By cash or checkþ By bank draft or money order payable to the Companyþ Pursuant to a Regulation T Program if the Shares are publicly tradedþ By delivery of already-owned shares if the Shares are publicly traded
 
 1
    
    If this is an Incentive Stock Option, it (plus
other outstanding Incentive Stock Options) cannot be first exercisablefor more
than $100,000 in value (measured by exercise price) in any calendar year. Any
excess over $100,000 is a Nonstatutory Stock Option. 1.




---



##### 



þ If and only to the extent this option is a Nonstatutory Stock Option,
and subject to the Companys consent at the time of exercise, by a net
exercise arrangement2
 Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Other Agreements:
  
 
 2
    
    Any portion of this option intended to
qualify as an Incentive Stock Option may not be exercised by net exercise. 2.




---



##### 



Conexant Systems, Inc.  2010 Equity Incentive Plan
 Option Agreement  (Incentive Stock Option or Nonstatutory Stock Option)
 Grant Notice Company Plan
  1. Vesting.
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price.
 3. Exercise Restriction for Non-Exempt Employees. i.e. Non-Exempt Employee
 4. Method of Payment. unless otherwise provided in your Grant
Notice
 (a)
 (b)
 3.




---



##### 



(i) subject to the consent of the Company at the
time of exercise
 5. Whole Shares.
 6. Securities Law Compliance.
 7. Term.
 (a)
 (b) however,
 4.




---



##### 



(c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
  8. Exercise.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 9. Transferability.
 5.




---



##### 



(a)
 (b)
 10. Option not a Service Contract.
 11. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 6.




---



##### 



(c)
 12. Tax Consequences
 13. Notices.
 14. Governing Plan Document.
 7.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 5676)    
Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning indviduals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel; Biotechnology SEP.                    

*Date:*                         February 23, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Guo Zhang, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 1064, Bethesda, MD 20892-796. 301-435-0812.                         *zhanggu@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure; 93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 26, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-977 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20463 

December 7, 2019 

Office of the Chief of Protocol 

Diplomatic Gift Unit 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

VIA E-MAIL 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Employees of the Federal Election Commission did not give gifts to foreign individuals 

with more than minimal value between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. 

Please contact me at (202) 694-1003 or apike@fec.gov if you need additional 

information. 

Sincerely, 

AmyE. Pik 

Deputy Director, Congressional Affairs
rfc' ''Edit VtoiM Qaato Acdm'. Mtadmi* 

J o ''an^" ami] tj J a o o ^ ^ a BB- -5=' ^;' =, jiQ B 

• JOQ) flgl 

_ I Scott PoBto - ht... x j @!|HE: DRft IrtBnn... X | SiBE : DB» Imarim- x | fi?|> fWi OuJr Ret- X |S!|HE: SmuKiB - xf^RE : SmpailfiBrx|@!|WE- Naiii - Xj^RE : litonalian n... xJ^HE : AnBn!!!?q 

*Nail P. Reiff* <willg—ndlefreiB.com> 

02(22(2011 03:46 P M 

To 

cc 

bcc 

Subject 

a'^detiletgfec.gov' <tdotiler@fac.goy> 

'abradfard@afkdemt.org' <abradfard@arhdeiwt.oro> 

PWiAuditRetponie 

Nell and I spoke. We have until the first week of Mareh to file our response, but I disagreed with the majority of the auditor's findings. The two items below are the questionable items. Nell Is 

trying to schedule a call with the Auditor on Friday to go over these Items before we respond. If ya'll are out of town and cannot make the call. It Is ok. This is not our official response. Just 

deartngthese items up with the FEC 

Attached Is the auditor's spreadsheet of "Misstatements". I went through and made notes on every transactiori, with the exception of two, which I have outlined below. I feel that every 

transaction I noted In the spreadsheet is correct. 

These are the two items not explained Inthe spreadsheet. These may not have been the best way to do things, but 1 think the reasoning Is Justifiable with the FEC 

The Unreported Transfer to Non Fed and the Unreported Fundraising receipts ($87,496.26): 

•This was the ticket sales fram the 2007 Inauguration. The ticket vendor provided one lump check of all contributions f orticket sales. It was not broken down Into a check forthe Federal 

contributors and one forthe Non Fed. It wasjust one check. The Party deposited this check and Immediately transferred the Non Fed portion to the State account. This was not a misdeposlt. It 

was the only way to administratively split the check with the bank. The Party did not report the non fed portion or the corresponding transfer out (which was a wash) because It was only done 

this way for administrative purposes. 

The unreported check and unreported transfer up from non fed. ($66,000): 

This was a simple mistake. A non federal check was acddently ivrltten out of the Federal Account, when It should have come out of the State Account. A transfer was quickly made from the 

State to Fed Account to "reverse" it. Since they were done in the same reporting period, they were both excluded from the report. 

Thanks, 

-Matt 

Matthew Langley 

M.D.Lang|ey & Associates, a C 

223 Rosa L Parks Avenue, Suite 402 

Nashville, TN 37203 

(615) 574-7815 Office 

(615)916-2663 Fax 

615) 476-8727 Cell 

B E
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms F-3 (No. 333-147099) and
S-8 (No. 333-138449) of Danaos Corporation of our report dated April 4, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in this Form 20-F.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.
Athens, Greece
April 4, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# AGENCY:

National Transportation Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Transportation Safety Board Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anh Bolles, Chief, Human Resources Division, Office of Administration, National Transportation Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594-0001, (202) 314-6355.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314 (c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, United States code requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES performance review boards. The board reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and considers recommendations to the appointing authority regarding the performance of the senior executive. The following have been designated as members of the Performance Review Board of the National Transportation Safety Board:

The Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, Vice Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board; PRB Chair.

The Honorable Deborah A.P. Hersman, Member, National Transportation Safety Board.

Steven Goldberg, Chief Financial Officer, National Transportation Safety Board.

Lowell Martin, Deputy Executive Director, Consumer Products Safety Commission.

Richard Brechbiel, Chief Human Capital Officer, Small Business Administration.

Joseph G. Osterman, Managing Director, National Transportation Safety Board.

Dated: November 17, 2006.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 06-9359  Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
EXHIBIT 35.3
                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
               RFMSI SERIES 2006-SA2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:        /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        ----------------------------
        Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
        Title: Managing Director
§ 2516.720 What is the length of each type of grant? ( a ) One year is the maximum length of— ( 1 ) A planning grant under § 2516.200 (a), (c) or (e); and
( 2 ) A grant to a local partnership for activities in a nonparticipating State under § 2516.200 (b)(2) and (d)(2).
( b ) All other grants are for a period of up to three years, subject to satisfactory performance and annual appropriations.