alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2556.730 May VISTAs participate in elections? ( a ) Provided that paragraph (b) of this section is fully adhered to, and in accordance with the prohibitions set forth in § 2556.710, a VISTA may: ( 1 ) Register and vote in any election;
( 2 ) Act as recorder, watcher, challenger, or similar officer at polling places;
( 3 ) Serve as an election judge or clerk, or in a similar position; and
( 4 ) Drive voters to polling places for a partisan political candidate, partisan political group, or political party.
( 5 ) Participate in voter registration activities.
( b ) A VISTA may participate in elections as long as such participation: ( 1 ) Does not interfere with the performance of, or availability to perform, their assigned VISTA project duties;
( 2 ) Does not interfere with the provision of service in the VISTA program;
( 3 ) Does not involve any use of VISTA assistance, resources or funds;
( 4 ) Would not result in the identification of the VISTA as being a participant in or otherwise associated with the VISTA program;
( 5 ) Is not conducted during scheduled VISTA service hours; and
( 6 ) Does not interfere with the full-time commitment to remain available for VISTA service without regard to regular working hours, at all times during periods of service, except for authorized periods of leave.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75742-75747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-09]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, 
(703) 601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-09 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 75743]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.025


[[Page 75744]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.026


[[Page 75745]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.027


[[Page 75746]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.028


[[Page 75747]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.029

[FR Doc. 06-9747 Filed 12-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Joseph Postbinder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Joseph Postbinder
Joseph PostbinderChief Executive OfficerNovember 2, 2005
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
```

[House Document 111-148]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress, 2nd Session - - - - - - - - - House Document 111-148
 
 TERMINATION OF SUSPENSIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMANENT 
MUNITIONS EXPORT LICENSES FOR EXPORTS TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

NOTIFICATION TERMINATING THE SUSPENSIONS PERTAINING TO THE ISSUANCE OF 
    TEMPORARY MUNITIONS EXPORT LICENSES FOR EXPORTS TO THE PEOPLE'S 
  REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 101-246, SEC. 902(b)(2) (104 
                               STAT. 85)

 November 15, 2010.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed

                               ______

               U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
99-011                  WASHINGTON : 2010

                                            The White House
                                       Washington, October 8, 2010.
Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to the authority vested in me 
by section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization 
Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246) (the 
``Act''), and as President of the United States, I hereby 
report to the Congress that it is in the national interest of 
the United States to terminate the suspensions under section 
902(a)(3) of the Act with respect to the issuance of temporary 
munitions export licenses for exports to the People's Republic 
of China insofar as such restrictions pertain to the C-130 
cargo aircraft to be used in oil spill response operations at 
sea. License requirements remain in place for these exports and 
require review and approval on a case-by-case basis by the 
United States Government.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Postbinder, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Joseph Postbinder
Joseph PostbinderChief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2008 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
#### § 2552.81 Who is eligible to be served?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544, Aug. 30, 2024.

Foster Grandparents serve only children and youth with special and exceptional needs, or in circumstances that limit their academic, social, or emotional development, who are less than 21 years of age.

[74 FR 46509, Sept. 10, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 64652, Dec. 17, 2018]
§ 261.42 Which reductions count in determining the caseload reduction credit? ( a ) ( 1 ) A State's caseload reduction credit must not include caseload decreases due to Federal requirements or State changes in eligibility rules since FY 2005 that directly affect a family's eligibility for assistance. These include, but are not limited to, more stringent income and resource limitations, time limits, full family sanctions, and other new requirements that deny families assistance when an individual does not comply with work requirements, cooperate with child support, or fulfill other behavioral requirements.
( 2 ) At State option, a State's caseload reduction credit may include caseload increases due to Federal requirements or State changes in eligibility rules since FY 2005 if used to offset caseload decreases in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) A State may not receive a caseload reduction credit that exceeds the actual caseload decline between FY 2005 and the comparison year.
( 4 ) A State may count the reductions attributable to enforcement mechanisms or procedural requirements that are used to enforce existing eligibility criteria (e.g., fingerprinting or other verification techniques) to the extent that such mechanisms or requirements identify or deter families otherwise ineligible under existing rules.
( b ) A State must include cases receiving assistance in separate State programs as part of its FY 2005 caseload and comparison-year caseload. However, if a State provides documentation that separate State program cases overlap with or duplicate cases in the TANF caseload, we will exclude them from the caseload count.
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Charles Joyce certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mobile Reach
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


                                            /s/  Charles Joyce
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Charles Joyce
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2004
Exhibit
32.2





Chief
Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W.
Gifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
      7, 2010
                /s/ David W. GiffordDavid
      W. GiffordChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEBENTURE


This Amendment No. 1 to Debenture (this “Amendment”)
dated this 28th day of May, 2020, by and among Bespoke Extracts, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”)
and The Vantage Group Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the “Holder”).


WHEREAS, the Holder is the holder of
an outstanding original issue discount convertible debenture of the Company, dated December 24, 2019 (the “Debenture”);


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire
to amend the Debenture as more particularly set forth below;


WHEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree
as follows:


1.       The Maturity
Date of the Debenture is hereby amended to be August 31, 2020. For the avoidance of doubt, no default will be deemed to have occurred,
and no default interest will be deemed to have accrued or be owed, since the original issuance of the Debenture to the date of
this Amendment.


2.       Except as modified
herein, the terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect.


3.       This Amendment
may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall be binding
upon all parties, their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. A
signature delivered by facsimile or email shall constitute an original.


[Signature Page Follows]






    


     


    




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.





	BESPOKE EXTRACTS, INC.	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Danil Pollack	 	 	 	 
	Name:	Danil Pollack	 	 	 	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THE VANTAGE GROUP LTD.	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 /s/ Lyle Hauser	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 Lyle Hauser	 	 	 	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
Presidential Documents

74753 

Federal Register 

Vol. 71, No. 238 

Tuesday, December 12, 2006 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of December 8, 2006 

Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice 

Memorandum for the Attorney General 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform 

Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., I hereby order that: 

Section 1. Order of Succession. During any period when the Attorney 

General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, 

and the officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become 

unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney 

General, the following officers of the Department of Justice, in the order 

listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney 

General, if they are eligible to act as Attorney General under the Federal 

Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, until such time as at least one of the 

officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties 

of the office of Attorney General: 

United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; 

United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; and 

United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas. 

Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed 

in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act 

as Attorney General pursuant to this memorandum. 

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President 

retains discretion, to the extent permitted by the Federal Vacancies Reform 

Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., to depart from this memorandum 

in designating an acting Attorney General. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS6
74754 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Presidential Documents 

Sec. 3. The Memorandum for the Attorney General of March 19, 2002, 

entitled ‘‘Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice,’’ is hereby 

revoked. 

Sec. 4. The Attorney General is authorized and directed to publish this 

memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 8, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 06–9691 

Filed 12–11–06; 10:31 am] 

Billing code 4410–19–M 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS6GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 52 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 52

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency entitled ``Finding That Lead Emissions From Aircraft 
    Engines That Operate on Leaded Fuel Cause or Contribute to Air 
Pollution That May Reasonably Be Anticipated To Endanger Public Health 
                             and Welfare''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2023

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency entitled ``Finding That Lead Emissions From Aircraft 
    Engines That Operate on Leaded Fuel Cause or Contribute to Air 
Pollution That May Reasonably Be Anticipated To Endanger Public Health 
                             and Welfare''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``Finding That Lead Emissions From Aircraft Engines 
That Operate on Leaded Fuel Cause or Contribute to Air Pollution That 
May Reasonably Be Anticipated To Endanger Public Health and Welfare'' 
(88 Fed. Reg. 72372 (October 20, 2023)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 2553.84 What happens if a non-CNCS funded sponsor does not comply with the NGA?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545, Aug. 30, 2024.

A non-CNCS funded project sponsor's noncompliance with the NGA may result in suspension or termination CNCS' agreement and all benefits specified in § 2553.82.

[83 FR 64657, Dec. 17, 2018]
' 

a. a 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

INGE RUDBACH, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OP 22-0515 

TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, 

RAVALLI COUNTY, HONORABLE JENNIFER 

B. LINT, Presiding, 

Respondent. 

FILLAJ 

SEP 2 0 2022 

Bovvrni Gref,nwood Clerk of Supreme Court -;.ratr4 of Montana 

ORDER 

Petitioner Inge Rudbach, via counsel, seeks a writ of supervisory control to vacate 

an Order of the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, denying her motion 

to dismiss in Cause No. DV-2019-433, in which she is a defendant. She further requests 

that the District Court matter be stayed pending the resolution of this petition. 

We have amended the caption to reflect the proper parties in this original 

proceeding. M. R. App. P. 14. Having reviewed the Petition and the challenged Order, we 

deem it appropriate to obtain a summary response. Therefore, in accordance with M. R. 

App. P. 14(7), 

IT IS ORDERED that the Twenty-First Judicial District Court; and/or on behalf of 

the District Court, Travis and Jodie Spencer, plaintiffs in the District Court case; Justin 

Kirkbride, co-defendant in the District Court case; and Mad Jack Enterprises LLC, d/b/a 

Win Home Inspection Five Valleys, co-defendant in the District Court case; are each 

granted 30 days from the date of this Order to prepare, file, and serve a response to the 

petition for writ of supervisory control. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in the underlying case are 

STAYED pending this Court's decision on the Petition. 

09/20/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0515
The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for 

Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, 

Cause No. DV-2019-433, and the Honorable Jennifer B. Lint, presiding. 

DATED this -at , —day of September, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

Justices
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Baruch Tosh, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Baruch Tosh
Baruch ToshChief Executive OfficerNovember      12, 2009 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
PUBLIC LAW 109–277—AUG. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 777

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5107 (S. 2719):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

May 2, considered and passed House.

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–277

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 West

Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Earl D.

Hutto Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 17, 2006.

Aug. 17, 2006

[H.R. 5107]