alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             339                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,052                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,592                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                           1,238                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,641                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,329                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,631                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,641                       0
<SALES>                                          6,088                   5,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,088                   5,269
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,529                   4,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    96                      51
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179                     182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    284                     301
<INCOME-TAX>                                       114                     128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                170                     173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       170                     173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28                    0.32
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1801.43 Allowance for books.

The cost allowance for a Scholar's books is $1000 per year, or such higher amount published on the Foundation's website (*http://www.truman.gov*).
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

Apri l 14, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Patricia Carmona 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Joseph F. Stoltz 

Assistant Staff Director 

Christopher Hughey ' 

Acting General Counsel' 

Lawrence L. Calvert, Jr. 

Associate General Cou^el 

/ 

Lorenzo HoUoway 

Assistant General Counsel 

For Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Jennifer Waldman 

Paralegal 

Interim Audit Report on New Hampshire Republican State Committee (LRA 

#813) 

The Office of General Counsel has reviewed the Interim Audit Report on the New 

Hampshire Republican State Committee. We concur with the findings in the Proposed Report 

(Finding I - Misstatement of Financial Activity and Finding 2 - Reporting of Debts and 

Obligations). If you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Waldman, the paralegal 

assigned to this audit.
# Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as Amended

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 2601(c)(1), I hereby determine that it is important to the national interest that up to $5.215 million be made available from the U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected urgent refugee and migration needs resulting from conflicts in Somalia and Sri Lanka. These funds may be used, as appropriate, to provide contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and, as necessary, for administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration.

                    You are authorized and directed to inform the appropriate committees of the Congress of this determination and the obligation of funds under this authority and to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 06-9836

Billing code 4710-10-P
§ 1627.3 Characteristics of subgrants. ( a ) In determining whether an agreement between a recipient and another entity should be considered a subgrant or a procurement contract, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. All of the characteristics listed in paragraph (b) of this section may not be present in all cases, and the recipient must use judgment in classifying each agreement as a subgrant or a procurement contract. The recipient must make case-by-case determinations whether each agreement that it makes with another entity constitutes a subgrant or a procurement contract.
( b ) Characteristics that support the classification of the agreement as a subgrant include when the other entity: ( 1 ) Determines who is eligible to receive legal assistance under the recipient's LSC grant;
( 2 ) Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of the LSC grant were met;
( 3 ) Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making regarding the delivery of legal assistance under the recipient's LSC grant;
( 4 ) Is responsible for adherence to applicable LSC program requirements specified in the LSC grant award; and
( 5 ) In accordance with its agreement, uses the LSC funds or property or services acquired in whole or in part with LSC funds, to carry out a program for a public purpose specified in LSC's governing statutes and regulations, as opposed to providing goods or services for the benefit of the recipient.
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 13

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gaming Ventures plc
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

          Date: June 25, 2009        By: /s/ Shimon Citron
                                     ------------------------
                                     Shimon Citron, Chief Executive Officer

          Date: June 25, 2009        By: /s/ Jacob Bar-Shalom
                                     ------------------------
                                     Jacob Bar-Shalom, Chief Financial Officer
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1637 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1637

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on 
             credit card accounts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2009

  Mr. Ellison (for himself, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. 
    Clay, and Mr. Cleaver) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on 
             credit card accounts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Universal Default Prohibition Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBIT UNIVERSAL DEFAULTS ON CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS.

    Section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1637) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Universal Defaults Prohibited.--
            ``(1) In general.--No creditor may use any adverse 
        information concerning any consumer, including any information 
        in any consumer report (as defined in section 603) or any 
        change in the credit score of the consumer, as the basis for 
        increasing any annual percentage rate of interest applicable to 
        a credit card account of the consumer under an open end 
        consumer credit plan, or to remove or increase any introductory 
        annual percentage rate of interest applicable to such account, 
        for reasons other than actions or omissions of the consumer 
        that are directly related to such account.
            ``(2) Notice to consumer.--The limitation under paragraph 
        (1) on the use of adverse information by a credit card issuer 
        shall be clearly and conspicuously described to the consumer by 
        the credit card issuer in any disclosure or statement required 
        under subsection (a) or (b).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2550.60 From which of the State Commission requirements is an Alternative Administrative Entity exempt? ( a ) An AAE is not automatically exempt from any of the requirements that govern State Commissions. However, there are three specific State Commission requirements which the Corporation may waive if a State can demonstrate that one or more of them is impossible or unreasonable to meet. If the Corporation waives a State Commission requirement for a State entity, that State entity is, de facto, an AAE. The three criteria which may be waived for an AAE are as follows: ( 1 ) *The requirement that a State's chief executive officer appoint the members of a State Commission.* If a State can offer a compelling reason why some or all of the State Commission members should be appointed by the State legislature or by some other appropriate means, the Corporation may grant a waiver.
( 2 ) *The requirement that a State Commission have 15-25 members.* If a State compellingly demonstrates why its commission should have a larger number of members, the Corporation may grant a waiver.
( 3 ) *The requirement that not more than 50% plus one of the State Commission's voting members be from the same political party.* This requirement was established to prevent State Commissions from being politically motivated or controlled; however, in some States it is illegal to require prospective members to provide information about political party affiliation. For this or another compelling reason, the Corporation may grant a waiver.
( b ) Again, any time the Corporation grants one or more of these waivers for a State entity, that entity becomes an AAE; in all other respects an AAE is the same as a State Commission, having the same requirements, rights, duties and responsibilities.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 104 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration relating to ‘‘Corporate Average Fuel Economy 

Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks for Model Years 2027 

and Beyond and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Heavy-Duty Pickup 

Trucks and Vans for Model Years 2030 and Beyond’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BUDD, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. 

FISCHER, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

COTTON, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, Ms. ERNST, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. LEE, Mr. MULLIN, 

Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. TUBERVILLE, and 

Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration relating to ‘‘Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards 

for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks for Model Years 

2027 and Beyond and Fuel Efficiency Standards for 

Heavy-Duty Pickup Trucks and Vans for Model Years 

2030 and Beyond’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 104 IS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Na4 tional Highway Traffic Safety Administration relating to 

5 ‘‘Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Pas6 senger Cars and Light Trucks for Model Years 2027 and 

7 Beyond and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Heavy-Duty 

8 Pickup Trucks and Vans for Model Years 2030 and Be9 yond’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 52540 (June 24, 2024)), and such 

10 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 1604.7 Court appointments. ( a ) A recipient's written policies may permit a full-time attorney to accept a court appointment if the director of the recipient or the director's designee determines that: ( 1 ) Such an appointment is consistent with the recipient's primary responsibility to provide legal assistance to eligible clients in civil matters;
( 2 ) The appointment is made and the attorney will receive compensation for the court appointment under the same terms and conditions as are applied generally to attorneys practicing in the court where the appointment is made; and
( 3 ) Subject to the applicable law and rules of professional responsibility, the attorney agrees to remit to the recipient any compensation received.
( b ) A recipient's written policies may permit a full-time attorney to use program resources to undertake representation pursuant to a court appointment.
( c ) A recipient's written policies may permit a full-time attorney to identify the recipient as his or her employer when engaged in representation pursuant to a court appointment.
( d ) If, under the applicable State or local court rules or practices or rules of professional responsibility, legal services attorneys are mandated to provide pro bono legal assistance in addition to the attorneys' work on behalf of the recipient's clients, the recipient's written policies shall treat such legal assistance in the same manner as court appointments under paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(3), (b) and (c) of this section, provided that the policies may only permit mandatory pro bono activities that are not otherwise prohibited by the LSC Act, applicable appropriations laws, or LSC regulation.
§ 1604.6 Use of recipient resources. ( a ) For cases undertaken pursuant to § 1604.4(c)(1), a recipient's written policies may permit a full-time attorney to use *de minimis* amounts of the recipient's resources for permissible outside practice if necessary to carry out the attorney's professional responsibilities, as long as the recipient's resources, whether funded with Corporation or private funds, are not used for any activities for which the use of such funds is prohibited.
( b ) For cases undertaken pursuant to § 1604.4(c)(2) through (4), a recipient's written policies may permit a full-time attorney to use limited amounts of the recipient's resources for permissible outside practice if necessary to carry out the attorney's professional responsibilities, as long as the recipient's resources, whether funded with Corporation or private funds are not used for any activities for which the use of such funds is prohibited.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1532 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the statute of limitations 

on the award of the congressional medal of honor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the 

statute of limitations on the award of the congressional 

medal of honor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON 

4 AWARD OF CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF 

5 HONOR. 

6 (a) ARMY.—Section 3744 of title 10, United States 

7 Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘medal of 

9 honor,’’; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1532 IH

1 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘medal of 

2 honor,’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(e) No medal of honor or device in place thereof may 

6 be awarded to a person unless it appears from records of 

7 the Department of the Army that the person is entitled 

8 to the award.’’. 

9 (b) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.— 

10 (1) LIMITATIONS OF TIME.—Section 6248 of 

11 such title is amended— 

12 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘medal 

13 of honor,’’; and 

14 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘medal 

15 of honor,’’. 

16 (2) POSTHUMOUS AWARDS.—Section 6250 of 

17 such title is amended— 

18 (A) by inserting ‘‘(a) AWARD AUTHOR19 IZED; TIME LIMITATION.—’’ before ‘‘If’’; and 

20 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

21 subsection: 

22 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION FOR MEDAL OF HONOR.—The time 

23 limitation specified in subsection (a) does not apply in the 

24 case of the posthumous award of the medal of honor.’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1532 IH

1 (c) AIR FORCE.—Section 8744 of such title is amend2 ed— 

3 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘medal of 

4 honor,’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘medal of 

6 honor,’’; and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(e) No medal of honor or device in place thereof may 

10 be awarded to a person unless it appears from records of 

11 the Department of the Air Force that the person is enti12 tled to the award.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
p.1 

OAR Box 1837 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

175) IV-E-9 

Docket Number: 

A-84-33 

Printed 11/14/2008 3:48:11 PM Sheet 175 of 238 
.*-«"""*. 

* 

P.2 

r>^K-31 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

August 4 , 1987 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT : Conversation s with Representative s from AMC and 

N CA on Proposed NSR Surface Coal Mine Rulemaking 

New Docket Entry: Docket No. A-84-3 3 

FROM 

TO 

Barbara Brown 

Offic e of Air and Radiation 

Central Docket Section (LE-131 ) 

On Jun e 30 , 1987 , I had a brief discussio n with Larry Boggs , 

American Mining Congress , regarding the subject rulemaking . I 

advised him that EPA is continuin g its internal deliberation s on 

t he issue . On July 6, I had a similar conversatio n with 

J oe Mullan , National Coal Association . 

c c : Kirt Cox , Project Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition VII, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 23, 2009

|                               |                
|------------------------------ | ---------------
|/s/                            | Arnold P. Kling
|                               |                
|Arnold P. Kling               
|President                     
|(Principal Executive
 Officer)

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3,2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, October 2, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JERI THOMSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex. RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 

I I 

I 

I 

I 

I ~ ~ 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED - No. Doc. No. St'BJECT BY 

l 

l 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION, 

UNITED STATES AND CANADA 

* 403 851 Dennis L. Schomack, of Michigan, to be Sep 25, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Commissioner on the part of the United States Biden, Committee on Foreign 

on the International Joint Commission, United Relations, without printed report. 

States and Canada, vice Thomas L. Baldini. 

* &gnifies nomznee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and test~fy before any duly constltuted comm~ttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK