alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pam Patton To "tobrien@fec.gov" <tobrien@fec.gov> 

<Patton@ohlogop.ora> 

cc "Matt@wintersetcpa.com" <Matt@wintersetcpa.com> 

07/15/2011 10:46 Ai\/I 

bcc 

Subject Waiver of Hearing 

IHistory: ^ jhis message has been fonwarded. 

Hi Terry, 

Tliis email is to notify you that The Ohio Republican Party State Central & Executive Committee will not 

be requesting a hearing regarding the audit findings for the 2007-2008 election cycle. 

Please let me know Ifyou require any additional notification - the voice mail you left said an email was 

fine - but if you need this in letter form, just let me know. 

Thank you. 

Pam Patton 

Accounting Manager 

Ohio RepubHcan Party 

ph (614) 456-2043 

fax (614) 232-8842 

Paid for by the Ohio Repubiican Party, www.ohiogop.org. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

ChildrenCommunicationsCounselor TrainingDevelopmentally Appropriate PracticesPlay TherapySelf ExpressionToysTrend Analysis

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:

THURSDAY, AUGUST 22, 2019 AT 10:00 A.M.

PLACE:

1050 FIRST STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH FLOOR)

STATUS:

THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Internet Ad Disclaimers Rulemaking Proposal for REG 2011-02 (Internet 

Communication Disclaimers and Definition of “Public Communication”)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2019-14: Arizona Libertarian Party

Draft Advisory Opinion 2019-10: Price for Congress

REG 2019-02 (Amend 11 C.F.R § 104.5(c)) – Notification of Availability

Notice of Availability for REG 2019-03 (Mailing List Exchange)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Signed: _____________________________________

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: August 15, 2019
Manchester District Court,

No. 5704.

#### State *v.*Frank Teas.

Argued February 7, 1968.

Decided February 29, 1968.

*George S. Pappagianis,*Attorney General, *G. Wells Anderson,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mr. Anderson*orally), for the State.

*Bo is, Laflamme and Kalinski {Mr. Alexander J. Kalinski*orally ), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

This is a complaint under RSA 570:14 which reads as follows:

“No person shall be drunk in a street or other public place, nor in a private building or place, disturbing his family, or to the disturbance of the peace.”

According to the State’s evidence, two Manchester police officers while patrolling on Elm Street, Manchester’s main street, in a police “wagon” at about 11:30 P.M. on November 17, 1966, noticed an automobile with its lights on and motor running parked in front of a diner. As one officer approached the car on foot, he saw the defendant sitting in thedriver’s seat slumped over. He shouted, but receiving no response, opened the door, awakened the defendant, smelled alcohol and had him step out of the car. The defendant, according to the police officer, was unsteady on his feet, his face was flushed, and his speech slurred. He arrested him for drunkenness under the statute. The questions of law raised by *486the denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case were transferred by *Chretien,*J. under authority of RSA 502-A:17-a (supp).

There is no question but that Elm Street is a place to which the statute is applicable. *State*v. *Stevens,*36 N. H. 59, 63. See *State*v. *McConnell,*70 N. H. 294. The issue is whether the defendant was in “a street or other public place” when he was in the automobile which was in the public street. He cannot be convicted for his presence in the street outside the car after he had been ordered there by the officer and no such contention is made.

As was said in *State*v. *Desmarais,*81 N. H. 199, 201 the statute punishes “public drunkenness.” We hold that, in being drunk in his automobile parked in the public street where he was open to the public view of pedestrians passing by, the defendant was in violation of the statute. See Annot. 8 A. L. R. 3d 930.

The officer or his superior could have released the defendant after seeing to his safety and that of the public, without further proceedings, in the exercise of their discretion under RSA 594:18-a (supp) and defendant orally argued that since this would give adequate protection to both the defendant and thepublic we should not extend the application of RSA 570:14 to the facts of this case. The fact that the police had an alternative can have no effect upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the charge made.

*Remanded.*
#### § 1801.41 Scholarship stipends.

The Scholarship stipend may be used only for eligible expenses in the following categories: tuition, fees, books, and room and board. Payments from the Foundation may be received to supplement, but not to duplicate, benefits received by the Scholar from the educational institution or from other foundations or organizations. The designated benefits received from all sources combined may not exceed the costs of tuition, fees, books, and room and board as determined by the Foundation. The Foundation's Bulletin of Information, current at the time of the Scholar's selection, contains additional information about the terms and conditions of scholarship support.
#### § 156.931 Acknowledgement of request for hearing.

After receipt of the request for hearing, the ALJ assigned to the case or someone acting on behalf of the ALJ will send a written notice to the parties that acknowledges receipt of the request for hearing, identifies the docket number assigned to the case, and provides instructions for filing submissions and other general information concerning procedures. The ALJ will set out the next steps in the case either as part of the acknowledgement or on a later date.

[86 FR 24293, May 5, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1119

ADDIE D. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CHESTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (0:09-cv-00411-CMC)

Submitted: July 29, 2011 Decided: September 15, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Addie D. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Jasmine Rogers Drain, 

Allen Dean Smith, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Addie D. Campbell appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and 

granting summary judgment for Defendant in this employment 

discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Campbell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis 

for the district court’s disposition, Campbell has forfeited

appellate review of the court’s order. Moreover, to the extent 

Campbell seeks to raise new claims on appeal, those claims are 

foreclosed by her failure to raise them in the district court. 

Finally, to the extent Campbell seeks to raise an ineffective 

assistance of counsel claim, the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of 

effective assistance does not apply to civil actions. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1603.4 How does a person request voluntary testimony from an employee? ( a ) All requests for testimony by an employee in his or her official capacity, except employees of OIG described in paragraph (b) of this section, and not subject to the exceptions set forth in § 1603.1(d) of this part must be in writing and addressed to the General Counsel.
( b ) All requests for testimony by an employee of the OIG must be in writing and addressed to the OIG Legal Counsel.
( c ) Requests must state the nature of the requested testimony, why the information sought is unavailable by any other means, and the reasons why the testimony would be in the interest of LSC.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2023 AT 12:45 P.M.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH

FLOOR) AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

COMMUNITY LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE 

ABOVE-REFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 COMMUNITY 

LEVEL AND CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES. TO ACCESS 

THE MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov

AND CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2023-03: Colorado Republican State Central Committee

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Latinos for America 

First (A21-12)

Revised Audit Procedures

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: April 27, 2023
§ 1232.7 Remedial action, voluntary action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* ( 1 ) If the Director finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 or this part, the recipient shall take such remedial action as the Director deems necessary to overcome the effects of the discrimination.
( 2 ) Where a recipient is found to have discriminated against persons on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 or this part and where another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, the Director, where appropriate, may require either or both recipients to take remedial action.
( 3 ) The Director may, where necessary to overcome the effects of discrimination in violation of section 504 or this part, require a recipient to take remedial action: ( i ) With respect to handicapped persons who are no longer participants in the recipient's program or activity but who were participants in the program or activity when such discrimination occurred or
( ii ) With respect to handicapped persons who would have been participants in the program or activity had the discrimination not occurred, or
( iii ) With respect to handicapped persons presently in the program or activity, but not receiving full benefits or equal and integrated treatment within the program or activity.
( b ) *Voluntary action.* Recipient may take steps, in addition to any action that is required by this part, to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipient's program or activity by qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall, within one year of the effective date of this part, conduct a self-evaluation of its compliance with Section 504, with the assistance of interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons. Each recipient shall with the assistance of and consultation with interested persons, including handicapped persons, evaluate its current policies, practices and effects thereof; modify any that do not meet the requirements of this part; and take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( 2 ) A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, maintain on file, make available for public inspection, and provide to the Director upon request: ( i ) A list of the interested persons consulted,
( ii ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( iii ) A description of any modifications made and of any remedial steps taken.
[44 FR 31018, May 30, 1979, as amended at 68 FR 51388, Aug. 26, 2003]
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Gary ) 

Johnson 2012, Inc. ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election Commission, 

do hereby certify that on July 06,201S, the Commission decided by a vote of 

6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Gary Johnson 2012, Inc., as 

recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the 

Audit Division dated July 6,2015. 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

/ Date Shelley E. Gan{^ 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
**Exhibit 33.2**

REPORT ON ASSESSSMENT OF

COMPLIANCEWITH SEC REGULATION AB CRITERIA

First DataResources, Inc. through its affiliate REMITCO, LLC (jointly, the “AssertingParty”) is responsible for assessing compliance for the servicing oftransactions on the remittance payment platform relating to the opening,listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxesserviced by the Asserting Party as of and for the 12 month period endingDecember 31, 2006, (the “ReportingPeriod) with the servicing criteria set forth in the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB Section229.1122(d), except for the criteria set forth in Sections229.1122(d)(l)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv),1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii) and (v)-(xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded arenot applicable to the servicing of the transactions as set forth in agreementsbetween Capital One Services, Inc., together with its affiliates, Capital OneBank and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and the Asserting Party in so far as itrelates to the opening, listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed topost office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party (the “Applicable ServicingCriteria”) for the Reporting Period.

The AssertingParty has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria by theAsserting Party for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the AssertingParty has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria for the servicing of transactions relating to the opening, listing anddepositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by theAsserting Party as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period.

Ernst& Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issuedan attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the ApplicableServicing Criteria as of December 31,2006 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.
| First Data Resources, Inc. |   | REMITCO LLC      |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                       |   |             |
|                       |   |             |
| By:                        |   | /s/ David Bailis |   | By: |   | /s/ Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | David Bailis     |   |   |   | Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | President        |   |   |   | President |
|                       |   |             |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   |             |   |   |   |   |
| February 26, 2007          |   |             |   |   |

 

----
# Úřední věstník L 16/2011

| | ISSN 1725-5074
  doi:10.3000/17255074.L_2011.016.ces |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | L 16 |
| | |
| České vydání | Právní předpisy | Svazek 5420. ledna 2011 |

ISSN 1725-5074

doi:10.3000/17255074.L_2011.016.ces

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

L 16

České vydání

Právní předpisy

Svazek 5420. ledna 2011

---

| Obsah | | Opravy | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Oprava nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1272/2008 ze dne 16. prosince 2008 o klasifikaci, označování a balení látek a směsí, o změně a zrušení směrnic 67/548/EHS a 1999/45/ES a o změně nařízení (ES) č. 1907/2006 (Úř. věst. L 353 ze dne 31.12.2008) | 1 |

Obsah

Opravy

Strana

*

Oprava nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1272/2008 ze dne 16. prosince 2008 o klasifikaci, označování a balení látek a směsí, o změně a zrušení směrnic 67/548/EHS a 1999/45/ES a o změně nařízení (ES) č. 1907/2006 (Úř. věst. L 353 ze dne 31.12.2008)

(Úř. věst. L 353 ze dne 31.12.2008)

1

| CS | Akty, jejichž název není vyti_těn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.
  Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička. |
| --- | --- |

CS

Akty, jejichž název není vyti_těn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.

Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička.

---

Opravy

| 20.1.2011 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | L 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2011

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

L 16/1

---

Oprava nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1272/2008 ze dne 16. prosince 2008 o klasifikaci, označování a balení látek a směsí, o změně a zrušení směrnic 67/548/EHS a 1999/45/ES a o změně nařízení (ES) č. 1907/2006

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 353 ze dne 31. prosince 2008
  )

Strana 331, příloha VI, bod 1.1.2.1.1, tabulka 1.1:

místo:

| „Hořlavá tuhá látka | Flam. Sol. 1
  Hoř. Sol. 2“, |
| --- | --- |

„Hořlavá tuhá látka

Flam. Sol. 1

Hoř. Sol. 2“,

má být:

| „Hořlavá tuhá látka | Flam. Sol. 1
  Flam. Sol. 2“. |
| --- | --- |

„Hořlavá tuhá látka

Flam. Sol. 1

Flam. Sol. 2“.

Strana 332, příloha VI, bod 1.1.2.1.1, tabulka 1.1:

místo:

| „Vážné poškození očí / podráždění očí | Eye Dam 1
  Eye Irrit. 2“, |
| --- | --- |

„Vážné poškození očí / podráždění očí

Eye Dam 1

Eye Irrit. 2“,

má být:

| „Vážné poškození očí / podráždění očí | Eye Dam. 1
  Eye Irrit. 2“. |
| --- | --- |

„Vážné poškození očí / podráždění očí

Eye Dam. 1

Eye Irrit. 2“.

---
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009�1231

Integrated Multibeam and LIDAR Bathymetry Data Offshore of New London and Niantic, Connecticut

----

## Acknowledgments 

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		                                    URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1231/html/ack.html		Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact		Page Last Modified: Monday, 12-Jul-2010 02:20:01 EDT
1

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1610

___________

Phoebe M. Hudspeth, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Spectra Communications Group, LLC, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 3, 2003

Filed: December 12, 2003

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Phoebe M. Hudspeth appeals the District Court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in her employment-discrimination action against Spectra Communications

Group, LLC (SCG). Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jacob-Mua v.

Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we affirm. 
-2-

To the extent Hudspeth is arguing that summary judgment was prematurely

granted, she neither moved to compel the production of documents, nor requested a

continuance under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f). See Dulany v. Carnahan,

132 F.3d 1234, 1238 (8th Cir. 1997) (where shelter is not sought under Rule 56(f),

court generally does not abuse its discretion in granting summary judgment on record

before it). We agree with the District Court’s decision to consider all of SCG’s

supporting documents, see Wolff v. Brown, 128 F.3d 682, 685 (8th Cir. 1997) (in

employment-discrimination cases, internal documents relied on by employer in

making decision are not offered for truth of matter asserted, but instead to explain

employer’s conduct), and with the Court’s well-reasoned conclusion that Hudspeth

failed to create trial-worthy issues on the merits of her claims against SCG. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

36 37 38 39 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert C. Woodworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
         contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






                                       /s/ Robert C. Woodworth
                                       -----------------------
                                       Robert C. Woodworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 12, 2002
#### § 2552.21 Who is eligible to serve as a sponsor?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544, Aug. 30, 2024.

CNCS awards grants to public agencies, including Indian tribes as defined in section 421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit organizations, both secular and faith-based, in the United States that have authority to accept and the capability to administer a Foster Grandparent project.

[83 FR 64650, Dec. 17, 2018]
#### § 2400.63 Excluded graduate study.

James Madison Fellowships do not provide support for study toward doctoral degrees, for the degree of master of arts in public affairs or public administration. The Foundation may at its discretion, upon request of the Fellow, provide tuition only assistance toward teacher certification.

[69 FR 11815, Mar. 12, 2004]