alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

*(updated at 11:30 a.m.)

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 17

CONVENED JANUARY 6, 2009

*1st update 

http://www.senate.gov/ExecutiveCalendar

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 15 65-5 Austan Dean Goolsbee, of Illinois, to be a 

Member of the Council of Economic Advisers, 

vice Katherine Baicker, resigned. 

Feb 11, 2009 Reported by Mr. 

Dodd, Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

without printed report. 

* 16 65-13 Cecilia Elena Rouse, of California, to be Member 

of the Council of Economic Advisers, vice 

Donald B. Marron, resigned. 

Feb 11, 2009 Reported by Mr. 

Dodd, Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs, 

without printed report. 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

NAVY 

19 72 The following named officer for appointment to 

the grade indicated in the United States Navy 

while serving as the Attending Physician to the 

Congress, under Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 

of the Constitution: 

Feb 25, 2009 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Rear Admiral 

 Capt. Brian P. Monahan 

20 84 The following named officer for appointment in 

the United States Navy to the grade indicated 

under title 10, U.S.C., section 624: 

Feb 25, 2009 Reported by Mr. 

Levin, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed 

report. 

to be Rear Admiral 

 Rear Adm. (lh) Michael A. Brown 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4

AIR FORCE 

PN78 AIR FORCE nominations (86) beginning BRIAN D. AKINS, and ending JEFFREY J. WIEGAND, 

which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of February 9, 

2009. 

NAVY 

PN79 NAVY nominations (24) beginning CHRISTOPHER M. ANDREWS, and ending EZEKIEL J. 

WETZEL, which nominations were received by the Senate and appeared in the Congressional Record of 

February 9, 2009. 
NOTICE OF INTENT TO OBJECT TO PROCEEDING

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE AND OFFICE DATE AND SENATOR

5

 When following the objection to a unanimous consent request to proceeding to, and, or passage of, a measure or matter on their

behalf, a Senator has notified the appropriate leader, or their designee, in writing and submits such objection for inclusion in the 

Congressional Record and the Senate Executive Calendar, it shall be placed in the section of the Executive Calendar entitled “Notice 

of Intent to Object to Proceeding”. (Sec. 512, P.L. 110-81)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David B.
McWilliams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




1.     The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.     The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and   results of
      operations of the Company.











Date: May
13,
2008                                                    By:/s/David B.
McWilliams


David B. McWilliams


President and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of
ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                     
|Paritosh K. Choksi                         
|Executive Vice President of Managing Member
|Principal Financial Officer of Registrant  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Gormas. Michael (OST)

'0

Follow up

Completed

Martin, Michael (OST)

Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:39 PM

citymanager@cityofkake.org; PAUL.KHERA@ALASKA.GOV; michael.lu kshin@alaska.gov;

Rich.5ewell@alaska.gov

Gormas, Michael (OST); hank@hankm.com

Essential Air Service at Kake and Excursion Inlet

Harris Air Proposal to Provide EASat Kake, AK - 2014.pdf; Alaska Seaplanes Proposal to

Provide EASat Kake and Excursion Inlet - 2014.docx; Kake_EAS_Proposal_04282014

"~ _FlNAL.pdf =.,,:::" ...., ..

",\'"-;:

to:~~~j ~}:

~~~~

f~8~

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Hello everyone,

Follow Up Flag:

Flag Status:

From:

Sent:

To:

o (.t)

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Kake and Excursion Inlet, AK,as' well as give you

an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for

Aviation and International Affairs.

We issued O'rder 2014-3-15 (March 28, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EA5 for a new

term. In response to our request, three air carriers submitted proposals: Alaska Seaplanes, Harris Aircraft Services, and

SeaPort Airlines.

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov

sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, .

but no later than Thursday, May 29. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also,

please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list.

Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov.

Regards,

. Michael Martin

United States Department of Transportation

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP)

(202) 366-6494

1
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000335 25-SEP-2018 08:34 AM
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Jill Stein for President 

(JSF?) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on October 09,201S, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Audit Division Recommendation 

Memorandum on Jill Stein for President (JSFP), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the Assistant Staff 

Director, Audit Division dated September 25,2015 

Commissioners Goodman, Hunter, Petersen, Ravel, Walther, and Weintraub 

voted affrimatively for the decision. 

Attest; 

bic f, aot^ SiJbJiJl^niJtUkiA^ 

DatT' Shawn Woodhead Werth f 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
§ 2525.440 Is there a limit on the number of recipients an individual may designate to receive a transferred award? ( a ) An Eligible Individual may transfer all or part of a non-expired education award to no more than two recipients.
( b ) If a Designated Recipient rejects, in whole or in part, a transferred education award, or a transfer was revoked in accordance with § 2525.480, the education award can be transferred to another Designated Recipient, so long as the education award has not yet expired.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
ACLARA BioSciences, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Thomas G. Klopack  
|                        |  | Thomas G. Klopack      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          88,627
<SECURITIES>                                   312,419
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,661
<INVENTORY>                                      4,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               468,130
<PP&E>                                         174,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 987,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                     837,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   987,226
<SALES>                                        105,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,777
<CGS>                                           38,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,873
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,873
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
*No. 2669.*

#### Hugh Owen *v.*The State.

Obstruction of Public Road—Evidence.—The evidence in this case showing that the road obstructed was not located in accordance with the order of the commissioners court establishing it, and that, therefore, it was not a public road; and that, whether a public or private road, it was obstructed by the accused, not willfully, but with the belief, and with good cause to believe, that he had the legal right to obstruct it, does not support this conviction.

Appeal from the County Court of Navarro. Tried below before the Hon. J. H. Eice, County Judge.

This conviction was for obstructing a public road, and the penalty assessed was a fine of fifteen dollars.

The opinion summarizes the proof.

*Simkins & JSTeblett,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

At the time the road in question was located over the defendant’s land he was a minor, and he did not arrive at the age of maturity until less than two years prior to the time that he obstructed the road by fencing across it. The road was not located on the line designated by the order of the commissioners court. The route designated by said order did not pass over defendant’s land, but along its boundary line. In locating the road upon the ground, however, in order, we presume, to shorten the distance, it was placed upon defendant’s" land, which was at that time uninclosed prairie; but this was with the express understanding at the time that when the owners of said land should desire to enclose it, the road should be changed to the route designated in the order of the commissioners court establishing it.

• Defendant desiring to enclose his land, consulted attorneys with regard to his right to do so, informing his attorneys of the facts stated above, and said attorneys advised him that he had the right to enclose his land, and he acted upon this advice, which resulted in this prosecution and conviction.

*202Opinion delivered November 9, 1887.

We are clearly of the opinion that the conviction is wrong for two reasons. First, the evidence shows that the road located over defendant’s land was placed there without authority of law, and was not a public road. Second, conceding that it might and should be regarded as a public road, the evidence shows that defendant obstructed it believing, and having good reason to believe, that he had a legal right to do so, and therefore did not *willfully*obstruct it. Because the conviction is, in our opinion, against the evidence and the law, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
#### Charles F. Heffron, Respondent, *v.*Lackawanna Steel Company, Appellant.

*Heffron*v. *Lackawanna Steel Go.,*121 App. Div. 35, affirmed.

(Argued February 16, 1909;

decided March 5, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment, entered July 12, 1907, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, which reversed an *599order of the court at a Trial Term granting a motion to set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and. for a new trial, and reinstated said verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*Louis L. Babcock*and *Evan Hollister*for appellant.

*Joseph A. Wechter*and *Frederick O. Bagley*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
P O S T O F F I C E B O X 1 2 5 4 8 , A U S T I N , T E X A S 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 T E L : ( 5 1 2 ) 463 - 2 1 0 0 W E B : WWW . OAG . S T A T E . T X . U S

An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer · Printed on Recycled Paper 

October 20, 2015 

Christopher A. Prine 

1

st Court of Appeals 

 301 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

 Re: Civil Action No. 81239-I; Appeal No. 01-15-00413-CV; Boykin v. Ruzicka,

 et al.; In the First District of Texas Court of Appeals. 

To Whom It May Concern: 

This letter will serve as a request for the Record on Appeal. Please advise us of any additional 

cost in obtaining this record. Please send to us via Fed/Ex at 300 W. 15th Street, Clements Bldg. 

7

th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701-1220. Please call my legal assistant, Irma Trejo, at 512-936-

1294 for the Fed/Ex account number. 

Sincerely, 

 /s/CAROL M. GARCIA 

Carol M. Garcia 

Assistant Attorney General 

Law Enforcement Defense Division 

512/463-2080/Facsimile 512/936-2109

c: File 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00413-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/20/2015 10:52:50 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/20/2015 10:52:50 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
§ 1629.2 Definitions. *Annualized funding level* means the amount of: ( 1 ) Basic Field Grant funds (including Agricultural Worker and Native American) and (2) Special grants of LSC funds, including Technology Initiative Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund grants, and emergency relief grants, awarded by LSC to the recipient for the fiscal year included in the recipient's annual audited financial statements.
§ 233.29 How monthly reports are treated and what notices are required. ( a ) *What happens if a completed monthly report is received on time.* When the agency receives a completed monthly report by the date specified in § 233.28 it shall process the payment. The agency shall notify the recipient of any changes from the prior payment and the basis for its determinations. This notice must meet the requirements of § 205.10(a)(4)(i)(B) of this chapter on adequate notice if the payment is being reduced or assistance is being terminated. This notice must be received by the recipient no later than his or her resulting payment or in lieu of the payment.
( b ) *What happens if the completed monthly report is received before the extension deadline.* ( 1 ) If the completed monthly report is not received by the date specified in § 233.28, the agency shall send a notice to the recipient. This notice shall inform him or her that the monthly report is overdue or is not complete and that he or she has at least 10 additional days to file. It must inform the recipient that termination may result if that is the agency's policy, if the report is not filed within the extension period. This notice must reach the recipient at least 10 days before the expected payment. However, in States in which the date specified in § 233.28 is within 10 days of the expected payment date, the notice must reach the recipient on or before the expected payment date.
( 2 ) When the report is received within the extension period, the agency may delay payment to the recipient, as follows: ( i ) In a State that pays within 25 days of the budget month the payment may be delayed 10 days;
( ii ) In a State that pays within 25 to 45 days of the budget month, the payment may not be delayed beyond the 45th day.
( c ) *What happens if a monthly report is not received by the end of the extension period.* An agency may terminate assistance if it has not received a report or has received an incomplete report, and the 10 day extension period has expired. If the State decides to terminate assistance, it must send the recipient a notice which meets the requirements of § 205.10(a)(4)(i)(B) on adequate notice.
( d ) *How a recipient may delay an adverse action based on a monthly report.* If a recipient's assistance is reduced or terminated based on information in the monthly report, and he or she requests a fair hearing within 10 days, the assistance payment shall be reinstated immediately at the previous month's level pending the hearing decision. The payment shall be made effective from the date assistance was reduced or terminated.
[44 FR 26084, May 4, 1979]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
Section 1350 Certification(Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tandy Brands
Accessories, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, J.S.B. Jenkins and Mark J. Flaherty, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: September 23, 2004
    
    /s/ J.S.B. Jenkins
J.S.B. Jenkins
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Mark J. Flaherty
Mark J. Flaherty
Chief Financial Officer
§ 160.540 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ must determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this subpart, the ALJ is not bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, for example, to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ must exclude irrelevant or immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence must be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement are inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) Evidence of crimes, wrongs, or acts other than those at issue in the instant case is admissible in order to show motive, opportunity, intent, knowledge, preparation, identity, lack of mistake, or existence of a scheme. This evidence is admissible regardless of whether the crimes, wrongs, or acts occurred during the statute of limitations period applicable to the acts or omissions that constitute the basis for liability in the case and regardless of whether they were referenced in the Secretary's notice of proposed determination under § 160.420 of this part.
( h ) The ALJ must permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( i ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record must be open to examination by both parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Basic SkillsCommunity Based Instruction (Disabilities)DisabilitiesEducational EnvironmentEducational PracticesExperiential LearningInclusive SchoolsInstructional EffectivenessPreschool EducationResearch and DevelopmentTheory Practice Relationship

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget