alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of HC Innovations, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth Lamé, Chairman of the
Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Annual
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

|                     |                                                          
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June
 11, 2009 | By: /s/
 Kenneth Lamé                                    
|                     | Kenneth Lamé                                             
|                     | Chairman of
 the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JUSTIN POOD

, Appellant,

v.

KARI POOD

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1202

[ June 21, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Robert L. Pegg , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312017DR000440

.

Valentin Rodriguez, Jr. of Valentin Rodriguez, P.A., West Palm Beach,

for appellant.

Kari Pood, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 260.31 What does the term “assistance” mean? ( a ) ( 1 ) The term “assistance” includes cash, payments, vouchers, and other forms of benefits designed to meet a family's ongoing basic needs (i.e., for food, clothing, shelter, utilities, household goods, personal care items, and general incidental expenses).
( 2 ) It includes such benefits even when they are: ( i ) Provided in the form of payments by a TANF agency, or other agency on its behalf, to individual recipients; and
( ii ) Conditioned on participation in work experience or community service (or any other work activity under § 261.30 of this chapter).
( 3 ) Except where excluded under paragraph (b) of this section, it also includes supportive services such as transportation and child care provided to families who are not employed.
( b ) It excludes: ( 1 ) Nonrecurrent, short-term benefits that: ( i ) Are designed to deal with a specific crisis situation or episode of need;
( ii ) Are not intended to meet recurrent or ongoing needs; and
( iii ) Will not extend beyond four months.
( 2 ) Work subsidies (i.e., payments to employers or third parties to help cover the costs of employee wages, benefits, supervision, and training);
( 3 ) Supportive services such as child care and transportation provided to families who are employed;
( 4 ) Refundable earned income tax credits;
( 5 ) Contributions to, and distributions from, Individual Development Accounts;
( 6 ) Services such as counseling, case management, peer support, child care information and referral, transitional services, job retention, job advancement, and other employment-related services that do not provide basic income support; and
( 7 ) Transportation benefits provided under a Job Access or Reverse Commute project, pursuant to section 404(k) of the Act, to an individual who is not otherwise receiving assistance.
( c ) The definition of the term assistance specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section: ( 1 ) Does not apply to the use of the term assistance at part 263, subpart A, or at part 264, subpart B, of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Does not preclude a State from providing other types of benefits and services in support of the TANF goal at § 260.20(a).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7481

JAMES ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versusROBERT E. WARD, Warden; MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES C. CONDON, Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-3185-2-11) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Robinson v. Ward , No. CA-97-3185-2-11 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Executive Order 13418

# Amendment to Executive Order 13317, Volunteers for Prosperity

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to add combating malaria as one of the objectives of the global prosperity agenda, it is hereby ordered that section 1(a) of Executive Order 13317 of September 25, 2003, is amended by:

(a) striking “, and stemming the spread of HIV/AIDS.” and inserting in lieu thereof “, stemming the spread of HIV/AIDS and controlling malaria.”; and

(b) striking “, and the Middle East Partnership Initiative.” and inserting in lieu thereof “, the Middle East Partnership Initiative, and the President's Malaria Initiative.”.

[FR Doc. 06-9770

Billing code 3195-01-P
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03236

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

03236\03236_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03236\03236_Calc Sheet.doc Technical Review Notes

x 03236\03236_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 03236\03236_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03236\03236_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03236\03236_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03236\03236_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03236\03236_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03236\Telecon Documentation\Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

03236\Telecon Documentation\Plant Aerial View.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03236\Telecon Documentation\RE EPA Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow-up 03236.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03236\Telecon Documentation\WMS-PP Flow Diagram.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Waiver Request Support Document

80

Attachment 5

2012 Amendments to OBD II Requirements and Enforcement Regulation 

that Relax Pre-Existing Requirements 

Amendments to 1968.2

A. Section (c): Definitions.

1. “Warm-up cycle”

B. Section (d): General Requirements

1. Section (d)(3.2.1)(D)(v): Minimum Acceptable In-Use Monitor 

Performance Ratios

2. Section (d)(4.3.2)(F): Denominator Specifications

3. Section (d)(4.3.2)(H): Denominator Specifications

4. Section (d)(4.3.2)(K): Denominator Specifications

5. Section (d)(4.3.2)(L): Denominator Specifications

C. Section (f): Monitoring Requirements for Diesel/Compression-Ignition 

Engines

1. Section (f)(1.2.3)(B): NMHC Converting Catalyst Feedgas Monitoring

2. Section (f)(9.2.4): PM Filter NMHC Conversion Monitoring

3. Section (f)(15.2.2)(F): Comprehensive Component Output Component 

Monitoring

4. Section (f)(17.1): Exceptions to Monitoring Requirements - Revision of 

Emission Threshold or Malfunction Criteria

D. Section (g): Standardization Requirements

1. Sections (g)(4.2.6)(A) and (g)(4.2.7): Data Stream Parameter

E. Section (k): Deficiencies

1. Section (k)(4): Carry-over Deficiencies

2. Section (k)(7): Exceptions to Fines Requirements

Amendments to 1968.5

A. Section (b): Testing Procedures

1. Section (b)(6)(B)(i)a: Finding of Nonconformance after Enforcement 

Testing.

B. Section (c): Remedial Action 

1. Section (c)(3)(A)(i): Ordered Remedial Action-Mandatory Recall
### NUMBER S 13

- 1 4

- 00 006

- CR AND 13

- 14

- 00007

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

RAUL GARZA SALAZAR

, Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 445th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Raul Garza Salazar , has filed a “Motion to Abate Order Resolving to

Decide Appeal Without Reporter’s Record Until Trial Court Makes Decision on Indigency

of Appellant. ” According to the motion, appellant has become indigent, has recently lost

his job, and is without money to pay for the reporter’s record.2

After careful consideration, appellant’s motion is GRANTED. W e ABATE these

appeal s and REMAND the se cause s to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon

remand, t he trial court shall cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct

a hearing to determine the following:

1. Whether app ellant desires to prosecute these appeal s ;

2. Whether appellant is indigent;

3. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency;

4. Whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel or is proceeding with retained counsel, Larry Warner ; and,

5. What orders if any

, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate

notices and documentat ion to dismiss appellant's appeal s if appellant d oes not desire to prosecute these appeal s , or if app ellant desires to prosecute

these appeal s , to assure that the appeal s will be diligently pursued.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to cont inue the se appeal s and

that appellant is indigent and entitled to court

- appointed counsel, the trial court shall

appoint couns el to represent appell ant in the s e appeal s . If counsel is appointed, the

name, address, telephone number, email address and state bar number of the appointed

counsel shall be included in the order of appointment.

The trial court shall cause its finding s and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

clerk 's record and shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be

prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, shall be filed3

with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the da te of this

order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e 19th day of June , 2014

.
§ 1635.1 What is the purpose of this part? This part is intended to improve recipient accountability for the use of all funds by: ( a ) Assuring that allocations of direct costs to a recipient's LSC grant pursuant to 45 CFR part 1630 are supported by accurate records of the cases, matters, and supporting activities for which the funds have been expended;
( b ) Enhancing the recipient's ability to determine the cost of specific functions; and
( c ) Increasing the information available to LSC for assuring recipient compliance with Federal law and LSC rules and regulations.
#### § 160.502 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the following term has the following meaning:

*Board* means the members of the HHS Departmental Appeals Board, in the Office of the Secretary, who issue decisions in panels of three.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 74453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9665]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 74453]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-5 of November 27, 
                2006

                
Waiving the Prohibition on the Use of Fiscal Year 
                2006 Economic Support Funds With Respect to Various 
                Parties to the Rome Statute Establishing the 
                International Criminal Court

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 574 of the Foreign Operations, Export 
                Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
                2006 (the ``Act''), Public Law 109-102, I hereby:

                <bullet> Determine that it is important to the national 
                interests of the United States to waive the prohibition 
                of section 574(a) of the Act with respect to Bolivia, 
                Costa Rica, Cyrus, Ecuador, Kenya, Mali, Mexico, 
                Namibia, Niger, Paraguay, Peru, Samoa, South Africa, 
                and Tanzania; and

                <bullet> Waive the prohibition of section 574(a) of the 
                Act with respect to these countries.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress, and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washginton, November 27, 2006.

[FR Doc. 06-9665
Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1356
JOHN B. SHELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL SHAMUS; PETER CAPELLI; CALVIN HARRIS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at R ichmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1030) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John B. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. William Joe Hoppe, Senior Assistant City Attorney, Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from a jury verdict finding in favor of the Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint in which he alleged that the Defendants, who are all police officers, assaulted him following a traffic stop and illegally searched the trunk of his car. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the jury's verdict. Shelton v. Shamus , No. CA-96-1030 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
•

MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON. 0 C. 20463

February 5, 1981

FRED EILAND

PRESS OFFICE

BOB COSTA

PUBLIC ISSUANCE OF FINAL AUDIT

REPORT - 1978 EISENHOWER SILVER

JUBILEE DINNER COMMITTEE

•

\

-

•

Attached please find a copy of the final audit report of

the 1978 Eisenhower Silver Jubilee Dinner Committee which was

approved by the Commission.

Informational copies of the report have been received by

all parties involved and this report may be released to the

public •

Attachment as stated

cc: FEe Library

RAD

A'ublic Record

L/
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINC10N. DC 20461

•

•

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON ri'HE

1978 EISENHO\vER SILVER JUBILEE DINNER

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit of the 1978

Eisenhower Silver Jubilee Dinner (tithe Committee"), undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal Election Commission

in accordance with the Commission's audit policy to determine

whether there has been compliance with the provisions of the

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Act") .

The audit was conducted pursuant to Section 438(a) (8) of

Title 2 of the United States Code which directs the Commission

to make from time to time audits and field investigations

with respect to reports and statements filed under the provisions

of the Act •

The 1978 Eisenhower Silver Jubilee Dinner filed its

Statement of Organization with the Federal Election Commission

on March 7, 1978. The Committee maintained its headquarters in

Washington, D.C.

The audit covered the period January 1, 1978, the

beginning coverage date of the initial report filed, through

December 31, 1978, the termination date of the Committee. The

Committee reported a beginning cash balance of $-0-, total

receipts for the period of $2,710,881.44, total expenditures

for the period of $2,710,881.44, and a closing cash balance of

$-0-.

This report is based on documents and working papers

supporting each of its factual statements. They form part

of the record upon which the Commission based its decisions on

the matters in the report and were available to Comrrtissioners

and appropriate staff for review .
.... .

•

-2-

B.· Key Personnel

The principal officers of the Committee were George

Bush, Chairman, and William J. McManus, Treasurer.

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts and expenditures and individual transactions:

review of required supporting documentation and analysis of

Committee debts and obligations; and such other audit procedures

as deemed necessary under the circumstances.

II. Audit Findings and Recommendations

Certain matters noted during the audit were referred to

the Commission's Office of General Counsel for consideration

on October 2, 1979 •
......'t.-04lV"'-~.....-.~

0° °0 (> 0 0 0

'0

o cI

0 0

" (JC 0"

0 0

,......--~--~''""'"'v--~.........-w-..-..~_~_~ __"' 00

o 0 Q()

o 0

o

,,'b 0

,-...--~-~-....,._~

:&1

o 0

> 0'

°0

0

0

'0

0 0

0

0

"0

"'0 0Q 0

00

o '6

'"" 0

0

~EC

l) DOCUMENT

SEPARATOR

o 0

0 0

o 0

o G'

O~j./ 0 0

o 0°

o
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,365
<SECURITIES>                                    87,793
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,656)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,802
<PP&E>                                         106,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,556)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,197
<BONDS>                                        258,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                    (56,008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,065
<SALES>                                         16,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,352
<CGS>                                           16,022
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)

<FN>
EPS-PRIMARY REFERS TO BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE, AS DEFINED IN STATEMENT OF
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN> 
        







</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75723-75727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-02]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, 
(703) 601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-02 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 75724]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.006

[[Page 75725]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.007

[[Page 75726]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.008

[[Page 75727]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE06.009

[FR Doc. 06-9743 Filed 12-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
```