alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 911 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 911

 To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing 
                   aircraft, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2023

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing 
                   aircraft, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saracini Enhanced Aviation Safety 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS ON EXISTING 
              AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall issue an order requiring installation of a 
secondary cockpit barrier on each covered aircraft.
    (b) Covered Aircraft.--In this section, the term ``covered 
aircraft'' means a commercial passenger aircraft operating under the 
provisions of part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1631.17 Maintenance. A recipient must maintain real estate acquired with LSC funds: ( a ) In an efficient operating condition; and
( b ) In compliance with state and local government property standards and building codes.
American Technologies Group, Inc.







	







Exhibit 10.8



MODIFICATION
AGREEMENT



     WHEREAS,
as of September 25, 2000, American Technologies Group, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Subscription Agreements dated
as of September 25, 2000 (“Subscription Agreements”) issued
Convertible Notes (“Notes”) to the Subscribers in the amounts
designated on Schedule A hereto; and 



     WHEREAS,
the Company and Subscribers have determined that it is in the Company’s
best interests to modify the Subscription Agreements and Notes. 



     It
is now therefore agreed by the Company and Subscribers for good and valuable
consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, that: 



     1.
The Maximum Base Price as defined in Section 2.1(b)(i) of the Put Notes issuable
in connection with Put Notices made and given after the effective date of the
Registration Statement described in Section 10.1(iv) shall be the average of
$.06775 and seventy-five (75%) of the average of the three lowest closing bid
prices for the Common Stock on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board, NASDAQ SmallCap
Market, NASDAQ National Market System, American Stock Exchange, or New York
Stock Exchange (whichever of the foregoing is at the time the principal trading
exchange or market for the Common Stock, the “Principal Market”), if
not trading on a Principal Market, or such other principal market or exchange
where the Common Stock is listed or traded for the fifteen (15) trading days
prior to but not including the Conversion Date (“Lookback Average”).
The Maximum Base Price as described above shall be calculated only if the
Lookback Average is $.09 or higher, otherwise the Maximum Base Price shall be
$.06775. 



     2. The
number 4.99% as it appears in Sections 9.3(a) and 11.2e(i) of the Subscription Agreement
is in each instance hereby amended to be 9.99%. 



     3.
All terms employed in this Modification Agreement, unless otherwise defined
herein, shall have the same meanings attributed to them in the Subscription
Agreements and Notes. 



     4.
Except as modified herein, the Subscription Agreements, Notes, and documents delivered in
connection therewith remain in full force and affect. 



     5.
This Modification Agreement constitutes the binding obligation of the Company. 

















	







     6.
In lieu of the Company reissuing Notes reflecting the above described
modifications, a copy of this Modification Agreement shall be appended to each
Note. 



Dated: New York, New York

             November
15, 2000 












			AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.



By: /S/ LAWRENCE J. BRADY
Name: Lawrence J. Brady
Title: CEO






	


APPROVED: 



/s/ John Clarke
——————

KESHET L.P. 





/s/ John Clarke
——————

NESHER LTD. 





/s/ John Clarke
——————
THE
KESHET FUND L.P. 





/s/ John Clarke
——————

TALBIYA B. INVESTMENTS LTD.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 75952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9762]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


DoD Task Force on Mental Health Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs); 
DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice updates the previous notice, ``Notice of Open 
Meeting'' published on December 6, 2006 (71 FR 70743). In accordance 
with section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, announcement is made of the following meeting.
    Name of Committee: DoD Task Force on Mental Health, a Subcommittee 
of the Defense Health Board.
    Dates: December 18, 2006 (Afternoon--Open Session), December 19, 
2006 (Morning--Open Session), December 20, 2006 (Morning and 
Afternoon--Open Session).
    Times: 1300-1500 hours (18 December), 0800-1100 hours (19 
December), 0800-1700 hours (20 December).
    Location: Hyatt Regency Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA.
    Agenda: The purpose of the meeting is to obtain, review, and 
evaluate information related to the Mental Health Task Force's 
congressionally-directed task of assessing the efficacy of mental 
health services provided to members of the Armed Forces by the 
Department of Defense. The Task Force members will receive briefings on 
topics related to mental health concerns among military service members 
and mental health care delivery. The Task Force will hold a ``Town Hall 
Meeting'' session to hear concerns from the Washington, DC metro area 
active Duty Military, National Guard and Reserve, and Veterans 
communities and conduct executive working sessions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colonel Roger Gibson, Executive 
Secretary, Defense Health Board, Skyline One, 5205 Leesburg Pike, Suite 
810, Falls Church, VA 22041, (703) 681-3279, ext. 123.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The afternoon session on December 18, the 
morning session on December 19, and both morning and afternoon sessions 
on December 20, 2006 will be open to the public in accordance with 
Section 552b(b) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) 
thereof an Title 5, U.S.C., appendix 1, subsection 10(d). Open sessions 
of the meeting will be limited by space accommodations. Any interested 
person may attend, appear before or file statements with the Board at 
the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

    Dated: December 13, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-9762 Filed 12-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-01-M
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/05/2009 01:50 PM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Plosay, James R (DEC)" <jim.plosay@alaska.gov>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Edwards, Alice L S (DEC)" <alice.edwards@alaska.gov>, "Kuterbach, John F

(DEC)" <john.kuterbach@alaska.gov>, "Baumgartner, James R (DEC)"|

|<jim.baumgartner@alaska.gov>, "Dalcher, Debra S (DEC)"

<debra.dalcher@alaska.gov>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|10/05/2009 12:09 PM

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|Alaska rural utility NSPS engine comments

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

<<Rural Alaska NSPS engine.xlsx>> <<IC_ENGINE SOURCE TESTS.xlsx>>

Melanie –

Attached is the data requested by EPA and processed thru ADEDC’s database. I

hope this meets the requirement of your information request. Please let me

know if there is anything else I can provide for you.

Jim Plosay

Inspector, Title V Air Permits

Title V Permit Renewal Team Leader

State of Alaska DEC AQ/APP

907-465-5561 ph

907-465-5129 fx

Jim.Plosay@alaska.gov

(See attached file: Rural Alaska NSPS engine.xlsx)(See attached file:

IC_ENGINE SOURCE TESTS.xlsx)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 19581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07917]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

[Docket No. CPSC-2009-0093]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request--Consumer Opinion 
Forum

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or 
Commission) announces that the CPSC has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), a request for extension of approval of a 
collection of information from persons who may voluntarily register and 
participate in a Consumer Opinion Forum on the CPSC Web site, 
www.cpsc.gov. In the Federal Register of January 28, 2014 (79 FR 4454), 
the CPSC published a notice to announce the CPSC's intention to seek 
extension of approval of the information collection under OMB Control 
No. 3041-0135. The CPSC received no comments.

DATES: Written comments on this request for extension of approval of 
information collection requirements should be submitted by May 9, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments about this request by email: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202-395-6881. Comments by mail should be 
sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB 
Desk Officer for the CPSC, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. In addition, written 
comments that are sent to OMB also should be submitted electronically 
at http://www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. CPSC-2009-0093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact: 
Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504-7815, or by email to: 
rsquibb@cpsc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC seeks to renew the following currently 
approved collection of information:
    Title: Consumer Opinion Forum.
    OMB Number: 3041-0135.
    Type of Review: Renewal of collection.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Affected Public: Persons who volunteer to participate in Consumer 
Opinion Forum.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,489 respondents annually.
    Estimated Time per Response: 156 hours annually.
    Total Estimated Annual Burden: $4,560.
    General Description of Collection: The CPSC solicits consumer 
opinions and perceptions about consumer products, on a voluntary basis, 
through questions posted on the CPSC's Consumer Opinion Forum. 
Consumers, 18 years and older, who have access to the Internet and 
email, who voluntarily register to participate through a participant 
registration process, may respond to the posted questions.

    Dated: April 4, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-07917 Filed 4-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
EX-35 (b)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 13, 2007

Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Home
Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE3

Per Section 3.13a of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 8/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement has
     been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
#### State *v.*Charles F. Richardson.

October Term, 1899.

Present: Taft, 0. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Thompson and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed November 20, 1899.

*Marriage and divorce*— V. *S. 2703, 2704*— When a marriage is dissolved by a divorce, the libellee who afterwards marries in New Hampshire and' returns to and lives in this State with the wife whom he so marries, within three years from the date of the divorce, cannot be punished for living in this State under such marriage relation notwithstanding the provisions of Y. S. 2703 and 2704.

*State*v. *Shaituck,*69 Yt. 403 is decisive of this case..

Information for a breach of the divorce law. Windsor County, June Term, 1899, *Start,*J., presiding. Respondent demurred. Demurrer overruled *pro forma.*Respondent excepted. Case passed to the Supreme Court before final judgment

The information was filed June 4, 1899, and set out that the respondent at Albany in this State was married to Alice Richardson in July, 1886; that at the May Term, 1898, of Windsor County Court, a divorce was granted to the said Alice Richardson from the respondent; that the said Alice was still living ; that March 16, 1899, within three years after said divorce, the respondent was, in the State of New Hampshire, joined in marriage to one Hattie M. Royce of Norwich in this State; that immediately after said marriage and on the same day, the respondent returned into this State with the said Hattie M. and from that time to the filing of the information had lived in this State at Hartford in the County of Windsor with the said Hattie M. as his wife under the marriage relation so contracted with her in New Hampshire, contrary, etc.

*50
      *W. W. Stiekney*and *J. G. Sargent*for the State.

*James G. Harvey*for the respondent.

Taft, C. J.

*V.*S. chap. 132 regulates the subject of “ Marriage and Divorce.” Section 2703 of that chapter provides that when a marriage is dissolved pursuant to that chapter, the libellee is forbidden to marry a person other than the libellant for three years from the time such divorce is granted, unless the libellant dies. Section 2704 enacts that a person who violates the preceding section or lives in this State under a marriage relation forbidden thereby, shall be imprisoned, etc. In *State*v. *Shattuck,*69 Vt. 403, it was held that when a libellee in such a case, residing in this State, went into the State of New Hampshire, was there married and returned to this State, her marriage was lawful here. The respondent is complained of under sec. 2704 for living under a marriage relation forbidden by sec. 2703. The marriage was solemnized in New Hampshire and if the respondent, and Hattie M. Eoyce, the person to whom he was married in that State, are lawfully man and wife in this jurisdiction, as they are under the authority of *State*v. *Shattuek, supra,*it follows that they cannot be punished for living together in that relation in this State. *State*v. *Shattuck, supra,*is decisive of this case.

*Judgment overruling the demurrer reversed. Demurrer sustained. Information adjudged insufficient and quashed, omd the respondent discharged.*
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-1213 September Term, 2022

FEC-LRA1021

Filed On: August 31, 2023

Jill L. Stein, Dr. and Jill Stein For President,

Petitioners

v.

Federal Election Commission,

Respondent

BEFORE: Henderson, Wilkins, and Katsas, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for panel rehearing filed on August 21,

2023, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #21-1213 Document #2014931 Filed: 08/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries
International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Tsippy Moldovan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/S/ Tsippy Moldovan
-------------------
Tsippy Moldovan
Chief Financial Officer
May 23, 2005
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1894** 

I n re: NORMAN TYRONE DAIS ,

Petitioner.

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus
. ( 4:03

- CR

- 00386

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Norman Tyrone Dais , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Norman Tyrone Dais petitio ns for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to give him a copy of an order dated May 23, 2010. Because we are not able to discern what order Dais wants, w e conclude he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a dr astic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petiti oner has a clear right to the relief sought. I n re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. The relief sought by Dais is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with o ral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
§ 2555.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
§ 2525.330 What steps are necessary for AmeriCorps to pay interest that has accrued on a qualified student loan in forbearance? ( a ) If an Eligible Individual has obtained forbearance on a qualified student loan, AmeriCorps will make payments from the National Service Trust for interest that has accrued on that student loan during the individual's term of service, after: ( 1 ) The program verifies that the Eligible Individual has successfully completed the term of service and the dates when the term of service began and ended;
( 2 ) The holder of the loan verifies the amount of interest that has accrued during the term of service.
( b ) When AmeriCorps receives all necessary information from the program and the loan holder, it will pay the loan holder and notify the individual of the payment.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: January

24, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: January

14, 2015 Telephone Call with NextGen Climate Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants On January

14, 2015 , Howard J. Hoffman of EPA - OGC met by telephone with David Weiskopf of NextGen Climate to discuss NextGen Climate’s comments concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants .