SJERVED JAN-UAR_Y 13? 2012 

、町,

~ ,,' 

," _J 

.U03. DEPARTl\lfENT OF ‘乱也NSPORTATION

OFFICE OF HEARlNGS 

ASHINGTON, DC 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2011-1009 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

QUENTON T. BRO矶吁过

Respondent 

ORDERTOSHO 'CAUSE 'HYMOTION

TO DEEM ALLEGATIONS ADMITTED SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED 

On December 8, 2011 an Order Setting Third Litigation Scheduling Conference 

was filed and served on all parties' addresses of record. This Order required,田nong

other things, for Quenton T. Brown, the pro se Respondent, to file a written Answer on or 

before December 29, 2011. The Order required the parties to informally consult on 

January 5, 2012 wi each other regarding settlement and litigation proced es. The 

Order also required the parties to appe for a Third Litigation Scheduling Conference on 

Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 3:00pm Eastem Standard Time (EST) prior to the 

Conference. This Third Conference had been mutually set by the parties during the 

December 7, 2011 Second Litigation Conference. 

吨~

叩.

·蜀擅自.. 

On December 29, 2011 , the December 8, 2011 Order that had been sent to the 

Respondent' s new address of record (in Melboume, FL) ,臼 retumed as undeliverable. 

That same day, on December 29, 2011 , the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) 

called the Respol1dent at his telephone l1umber of record and left a message on the 

Respondent' s answering ml!chine. In this message the OAH reported the retumed mail, 

requested an accurate addr.êss, asked for a fax numb,er to use in oider to fax the returned 

Order to the Respondent, and provided a reminder of the Third Litigation Scheduling 

Conference, set for January 10, 2012 at 3:00pm EST. That ne day, on December 29, 

2011, the OAH re-mailed the December 8, 2011 Order to the Respondent at his former 

mailing address of record (in Or1ando, Florida), since the Respondent had noted during 

the December 7, 2011 Second Litigatiol1 Conference that he continued to pick up mail at 

that former address on a weekly basis. 

le Respondent did not respond to the OAH's December 29, 2011 telephone 

message. The Respondent did not file a written Answer on or before December 29, 2011 , 

or afterwards. 

On January 9, 2012 the Complainant, the FAA, filed a Motion to Deem 

Allegations Admitted. 

Page 1 of2 
On January 10, 2012 the parties were contacted by the OAH to.convene for the 

Third Litigation Scheduling Conference. The Respondent did not answer his telephone, 

and failed to appear for the Conference. During this Third Conference, the F AA was 

advised that the OAH mailing ofthe December 8, 2011 Order to the Respondent's new 

address of record had been returned as undeliverable. The F AA was directed to re-serve 

its Motion to the Respondent's fOlmer address ofrecord (in Orlando, FL), to ensure that 

the Respondent had notice of the Motion. 

On January 12, 2012 the FAA re-filed it Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted, 

and re-served the Motion on the Respondent at both his new address of record (in 

Melbourne, FL) and his former address ofrecord (in Orlando, FL). 

咱It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1. OnorbeforeJanuary27, 2012, andpursuantto 14C.F.R. ~13.211 and 14 

丑R. ~13.218 , the Respondent shall file a written Answer to the Order to Show 

矶'hy Motion.to Deem Allegations Admitted Should Not Be Granted. 1n this 

Answer the Respondent shall respond to each assertion made in the F AA' s 

Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted, and explain why he has not filed an 

Answer as previously ordered by this administrative court. 

2. The Respondent must also attach a written Answer to the Notice of Complaint in 

his Answer to the Order to Show Cause. 

3. The Respondent must also affirmatively give Notice ofa working mailing 

address, recognized by the U.S. Post Office, as his address ofrecord. Absent such 

Notice, the Respondent's only mailing address that remains serviceable is his 

former address of record (in Orlando, Florid时, at whtch .e Respondent has orally 

affirmed he still receives mail. 

4. The Respondent shall serve his written Answer to the Order to Show Cause, his 

Answer to the Notice ofComplaint, and his Notice ofa working mailing address, 

by U.S.. mail to all ihe parties listed in the attached Service List herein. The 

Respondent shall also provide a courtesy copy of these documents to the 

undersigned Judge by fax (202-266-366-7536). 

5. The FAA's Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted is reserved until January 27, 

2012. 

Attachment: Service List 

Page 2 of2 
, 

F ederal A viation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur 'right Building-Suite 2WI000

Quenton T. Brown, Respondent 

622 W. Miller Street 

Orlando FL 32805-4502 

TEL: 321-594-8501 

ONECOPY 

Mark G. Camacho, Compl in 's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal A viation Administration 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E: 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011 009

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S 

DC20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.