alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First Place Financial Corp. (First Place) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul S. Musgrove, Chief
Financial Officer of First Place, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Place.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                        
|---------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 4, 2005 |  | /s/ Paul S. Musgrove   
|                 |  | Paul S. Musgrove       
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
Default - Rule 55A (CO 40 Revised-6/2019) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND BANKRUPTCY COURTS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Plaintiff(s)

Civil Action: 

v.

Defendant(s)

RE:

DEFAULT

It appearing that the above-named defendant(s) failed to plead or otherwise defend this action though 

duly served on , and an affidavit 

on behalf of the plaintiff having been filed, it is this day of , declared 

that defendant(s) is/are in default.

ANGELA D. CAESAR, Clerk

By: 

Deputy Clerk 

END CITIZENS UNITED PAC

21-cv-01665-TJK

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

with summons and copy of the complaint 06/28/2021 15th September 2021 /s/Jackie Francis

Case 1:21-cv-01665-TJK Document 9 Filed 09/15/21 Page 1 of 1
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April                  30, 2007 | /s/                  Richard R.                  Ivanovick             |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Richard                  R. Ivanovick                                                                                              |
|                            | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                                           |

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 22

- 00064

- CV ROBSTOWN HARDWARE COMPANY and Deere & Company, Appellants

v. Heather J. IDEUS and Arlen Ideus, Appellees From the 229th Judicial District Court , Duval County, Texas Trial Court No. DC

- 21

- 175 Honorable Baldemar Garza , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Deli vered and Filed: July 20, 2022 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On January 31, 2022, appellants Robstown Hardware Company and Deere & Company filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s order denying their motion to transfer venue. When appellants filed their brief, they also asked us to consider it alternatively as a petition for writ of mandamus. We then set the case for submission on briefs on June 13, 2022, and sh ortly thereafter, on June 16, 2022, appellants removed the underlying case from state district court to federal court, where it is now pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, C ivil A ction N o. 2:22

- cv - 132.04

- 22

- 00064

- CV

- 2

- Once a notice of removal is filed, it “shall effect the removal and the State court shall proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d); see also I n re Sw. Bell Tel. Co., L.P ., 235 S.W.3d 619, 624 (Tex. 200 7) ; In re Zhou , No. 14

- 21

- 00424

- CV, 2021 WL 4537849, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 5, 2021, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Laza , No. 12

- 17

- 00280

- CV, 2018 WL 271833, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Tyler Jan. 3, 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (per curiam)

. “ Following removal, the federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over the action. ” Zhou , 2021 WL 4537849, at *1 (citing Laza , 2018 WL 271833, at *1 and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Del Mar Props., L.P. , 443 S.W.3d 455, 460 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2014, no pet. ) ). In this case, appellants’ joint removal to federal court vested the federal court with exclusive jurisdiction over th is matter

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d); Sw. Bell Tel. Co., L.P. , 235 S.W.3d at 624; Zhou , 2021 WL 4537849, at *1; Laza , 2018 WL 271833, at *1; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , 443 S.W.3d at 460. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this case , and we dismiss appellants’ appeal and alternatively pled petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. See Zhou , 2021 WL 45 37849 , at *1 (dismissing original proceeding for lack of jurisdiction following filing of notice of removal); Russell v. Dall

. Indep. Sch. Dist. , No. 05

- 10

- 00563

- CV, 2010 WL 2839633 , at*1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas July 21, 2010, no pet.) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction after case removed from state to federal court). Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
§ 2556.300 Is a VISTA considered a Federal employee and is a VISTA considered an employee of the sponsor? ( a ) Except for the purposes listed here, a VISTA is not considered an employee of the Federal Government. A VISTA is considered a Federal employee only for the following purposes: ( 1 ) Federal Tort Claims Act—28 U.S.C. 1346(b); 28 U.S.C. 2671-2680;
( 2 ) Federal Employees' Compensation Act—5 U.S.C. chapter 81, subchapter 1;
( 3 ) Hatch Act—5 U.S.C. chapter 73, subchapter III;
( 4 ) Internal Revenue Service Code—26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.;* and
( 5 ) Title II of the Social Security Act—42 U.S.C. 401 *et seq.*
( b ) A VISTA is not considered a Federal employee for any purposes other than those set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) A VISTA is not covered by Federal or State unemployment compensation related to their enrollment or service in the VISTA program. A VISTA's service is not considered employment for purposes of eligibility for, or receipt of, Federal, State, or any other unemployment compensation.
( d ) Monetary allowances, such as living allowances that VISTAs receive during VISTA service, are not considered wages. Monetary allowances, such as living allowances, that VISTAs receive during VISTA service are considered income for such purposes as Federal income tax and Social Security.
( e ) A VISTA is not, under any circumstances, considered an employee of the sponsor or subrecipient to which they are assigned to serve. No VISTA is in an employment relationship with the sponsor or subrecipient to which they are assigned. The sponsor is not authorized to make contributions to any State unemployment compensation fund on a VISTA's behalf.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ J. Scott CraigheadJ. Scott CraigheadChief Financial Officer
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C 20463 

April 6,2018 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas E. Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

FROM: ErinChlopak^y^ 

Acting Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Compliance Advice 

Margaret J. Forman M J'F 

Attomey 

SUBJECT: Proposed Interim Audit Report on Friends of Erik Paulsen (LRA 1069) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report, 

("proposed lAR") on Friends of Erik Paulsen. The proposed lAR contains one finding: Receipt 

of Contributions in Excess of the Limit* We concur with the finding. If you have any 

questions, please contact Margaret J. Forman, the attomey assigned to this audit. 

' We recommend that the Commission consider this document in Executive Session because the 

Commission may eventually decide to pursue an investigation of matters contained in the proposed lAR. 

nC.F.R.§§ 2.4(a) and (b)(6).
# Jfourtlj**Court of** **Antonio, March** **27, 2014** **No. 04-13-00382-CR** 

### Latoya**Mayberry, Appellant** **v. The** **State of** **Texas, Appellee** **Trial Court** **Case No.** **2010CR1138**

## ORDER**The Court** **has reviewed** **the record** **and briefs** **in this** **appeal and** **has determined** **that oral** **argument will** **not significantly** **aid it** **in determining** **the legal** **and factual** **issues presented** **in the** 

### appeal.**See Tex.** **R. App.** **P. 39.8.** **Therefore, all** **requests for** **oral argument** **arc denied,** **and the** **cause is** **advanced for** **ON BRIEFS** **submission on** **May 6.** **2014, to** **the following** **panel: Chief** **Justice Stone.** **Justice Barnard,** **and Justice** **Chapa. All** **parties will** **be notified** **of the** **Court's decision** **in this** **appeal in** **accordance with** **Tex. R.** **App. P.** **48. Either** **party may** **file motion** **requesting the** **Court to** **reconsider its** **determination that** **oral argument** **will not** **significantly aid the** **Court in** **determining the** **legal and** **factual issues** **presented in** **the appeal.** **See TEX.** **R. APP.** **P. 39.8.** **Such motion** **should be filed** **within ten** **(10) days** **from the** **date of** **this order.** **It is** **so ORDERED** **on March** **27. 2014.** **Catherine) Stone,** **Chief Justice** 

## IN**WITNESS WHEREOF.** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **a/fixed the** **seal o/the** **said court** **on this** **March 27,** **2014.**
#### § 184.20 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this part, unless the context indicates otherwise:

*Health insurance issuer* has the meaning given to the term in § 144.103 of this subtitle.

*Plan year* has the meaning given to the term in § 156.20 of this subchapter.

*Qualified health plan* has the meaning given to the term in § 156.20 of this subchapter.

*Qualified health plan issuer* has the meaning given to the term in § 156.20 of this subchapter.
dditional answers to your

questions call FAA at:

2) 267-7530

or

ne: (800) 467-4922

 Aviation Security

al Information?

onal Copies?

pies of this publication:

NING@dot.gov

467-4922, X3

)366-7342

of Transportation

erials Safety Administration

 Initiatives & Training/PHH-50

 Street, SW

C 20590-0001

11/00

s Program Website

ov/cas/dgp.htm

aterials Homepage

at.dot.gov

Fuel Control Unit Extinguishers Fire

Radioactive Exit Signs Oxygen Generators Is

Your

COMAT

Safe

To

Fly?

Is

Your

COMAT

Safe

To

Fly?

RSPA-X0131

U.S. Department of TransportationPipeline and Hazardous MaterialsSafety Administration

06/16/2005, 4:19 PM
Do the Regulations Provide Any Exceptions

For The Transport of COMAT?

Installed equipment containing hazardous materials ORhazardous materials required aboard an airplane to meetairworthiness requirements of the FAA are excepted fromthe HMR. There is limited relief provided in 49 CFR175.10(a)(2) for the transport of COMAT if it is beingtransported as an item of replacement. Specializedpackaging may be used in place of required packaging if itprovides at least an equivalent level of protection. Aircraftbatteries may exceed the 25 kg quantity limit imposed onother batteries for transport aboard passenger aircraft. Allother applicable hazardous materials regulations - such as,preparation of shipping papers, marking and labeling ofpackages, handling, stowage, securement, and training ofemployees - still apply.

Who May Transport COMAT?

Only an airline with an FAA approved Hazardous Material/Dangerous Goods program may transport its ownmaterials as COMAT. If an airline does not have anapproved program, it must offer its COMAT to anothercarrier for transport as cargo.

Did You Know?

The Following Are Examples of Hazardous MaterialsWhich MUST Be Declared Properly:Cabin Fire Extinguisher Radioactive Exit SignChemical Oxygen Generator Rain RepellentAuxiliary Power Unit First Aid KitUnpurged Fuel Control Unit Life RaftDepleted Uranium Control Balance Aircraft BatteriesCrew Oxygen Cylinder Under Seat Life VestEngine Fire Extinguisher and Explosive SquibEmergency Walk Around Oxygen CylinderCargo Compartment Halon Fire Extinguisher

4

5

4

8

16

15 13

1

9

17

0 6

6

2

10

ls Onboard Aircraft

d

t

)

10 Oxygen Bottles, Portable,

Gaseous

11 Oxygen Bottles, Crew

System, Gaseous

12 Oxygen Bottles,

Passenger System,Gaseous (Standard)

13 Oxygen Generators

(optional: each PSUstandard: each attendantstation and lavatory)

14 Rain Repellent15 Refrigerant (located in

each galley)

16 Smoke Hoods17 Tritium Signs (aisles and

emergency exit doors)

06/16/2005, 4:19 PM
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Archibald C. Tipton *v.*Superintendent of House of Correction.

November 16, 1914:

Per Curiam,

The questions involved in this case as well as those in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Thomas M. Thompson v. Superintendent of House of Correction are clearly and correctly answered in the opinion filed by Judge Audenried in the latter case. For the reasons there given the judgment is affirmed and the relator is remanded.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Glenn D. BolducGlenn D. BolducPresident, Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2011







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of we, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of we.




/s/Glenn D.
      BolducGlenn
      D. BolducPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      November 13, 2009







This
certification accompanies each report of we on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes
of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to we and
will be retained by we and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or our staff upon request.
Kevin Broghamer To <CCrussiah@fec.gov>, 

<kevin@broghainerilc.com> ^ 

cc <aboniawicz@fec.gov> 

04/24/2014 09:24 AM 

DCC I

Please respond to 

<Kevln@BroghamerL1-C.com> Subject RE: Roemer PAR response 

History: ^ This message has been replied to. . • , , 

Rosa, BRFP has no comments or challenges In regards to the attached PAR draft. 

Please let me know if you have any other questions for the Committee. Thank you very 

much, Kevin 

(859) 619-1512 mobile 

(859) 919-2369 fax 

Kevin.Broghamer skype
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75227-75228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project, Malheur National Forest, 
Grant County, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2006, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Chrome Fire Salvage 
Recovery Project on the Blue Mountain Ranger District of the Malheur 
National Forest, was published in the Federal Register (71 FR 71121). 
Forest Service has decided to cancel the preparation of this EIS. The 
NOI is hereby rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Hensley, Project Manager, 
Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John 
Day, Oregon, telephone 541-575-3167, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c060409021f0009152c0a1f420a090842191f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="13797b767d607f766a5375603d7576773d6660">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 75228]]


    Dated: December 8, 2006.
Gary L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9688 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time & Date:

10 a.m. Thursday, December 7, 2006.

# Place:

1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

Open.

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Jeffrey T. Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 220-2372;                         *jbryson@nw.org.*

# Agenda:

I. Call to Order.

II. Approval of the Minutes.

III. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

IV. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.

V. Financial Report.

VI. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report. 

a. Gulf Coast Rebuilding Initiative. 

b. NHSA Update.

VII. Information Management Division Presentation.

VIII. Adjournment.

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

General Counsel/Secretary.

[FR Doc. 06-9582 Filed 12-4-06; 2:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-M