alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 19, 2000
<P>
Richard I. Anslow, Esq.
4400 Route 9, 2nd Floor
Freehold, New Jersey 07728
<P>
     Re:     Agreement between Segway VII Corp. and
             Richard I. Anslow
<P>
Dear Mr. Anslow:
<P>
The following sets forth the agreement between Segway VII
Corp. ("SEGWAY") and Richard I. Anslow ("ANSLOW"):
<P>
     1.  ANSLOW agrees to purchase 4,000,000 restricted
common shares of SEGWAY at the value of $.0001 per share for
a purchase price of $500.00.
<P>
     2.  Upon the receipt of $500.00, SEGWAY will tender the
shares from treasury to ANSLOW.
<P>
     3.  ANSLOW represents that he is an "accredited
investor" as defined under the 1933 Securities Act.  In
addition, ANSLOW has been provided with access to all
documents of SEGWAY and has signed a subscription agreement
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
<P>
     4.  Notice shall be given by certified mail, return
receipt requested, the date of notice being deemed the date
of postmarking.  Notices, unless either party has notified
the other party of an alternative address as provided
hereunder, shall be sent to the address set forth herein.
<P>
     5.  In the event that any term, covenant, condition, or
other provision contained herein is held to be invalid, void
or otherwise unenforceable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the invalidity of any such term, covenant,
condition, provision or Agreement shall in no way affect
any other term, covenant, condition or provision or Agreement
contained herein, which shall remain in full force and
effect.
<P>
     6.  This Agreement contains all of the terms agreed
upon by the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.  This Agreement has been entered into after full
investigation.
<P>
     7.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of New Jersey
applicable to agreements made and to be performed within the
State of New Jersey without giving the effect to the
conflict of law principals thereof.
<P>
     8.  No amendments or additions to this Agreement shall
be binding unless in writing, signed by both parties, except
as herein otherwise provided.
<P>
     9.  Neither party may assign nor delegate any of its
rights or obligations hereunder without first obtaining the
written consent of the other party.
<P>
Very truly yours,
<P>
RICHARD I. ANSLOW & ASSOCIATES
<P>
By: /s/ Ross A. Goldstein
--------------------------------
     ROSS A. GOLDSTEIN
<P>
RAG/tp
<P>
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:        ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:
<P>
SEGWAY VII CORP.
<P>
By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow   By: /s/ Richard I. Anslow
--------------------------  ------------------------------
        RICHARD I. ANSLOW           RICHARD I. ANSLOW
        Secretary
<P>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the“Company”) on

Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange

Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned,Brad J. Moynes, Chief Financial Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

 

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the

Financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

By:

 

 

/s/ Brad J. Moynes

Brad J. Moynes

Chief Financial Officer

May2, 2014
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 1/13/2016

TO: CSAPR Update Proposal Meeting; Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR–2015-0500

FROM: Jeremy Mark, EPA

SUBJECT: CSAPR Update Proposal 

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the below attendees on 1/13/2016 to discuss the 

CSAPR Update Proposal. The proposed CSAPR Updated Proposal was proposed on December 

3, 2015.

ATTENDEES

Jeremy Mark, EPA

David Risley, EPA

David Misenheimer, EPA

Larry Sorrels, EPA

Vince Albanese, Fuel Tech, Inc

Kevin Dougherty, Fuel Tech, Inc
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1602 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1602

       To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without 
 consideration, to Piasecki Aircraft Corporation the right, title, and 
 interest of the United States in and to Navy aircraft N40VT, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2009

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without 
 consideration, to Piasecki Aircraft Corporation the right, title, and 
 interest of the United States in and to Navy aircraft N40VT, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF NAVY AIRCRAFT N40VT.

    (a) Authority To Convey.--The Secretary of the Navy may convey, 
without consideration, to Piasecki Aircraft Corporation of Essington, 
Pennsylvania (in this section referred to as ``transferee''), all 
right, title, and interest of the United States, except as set forth 
elsewhere herein, in and to Navy aircraft N40VT (Bureau Number 163283) 
and associated components and test equipment, previously specified as 
Government furnished equipment, specified in contract N00019-00-C-0284. 
The conveyance shall be made by means of a deed of gift.
    (b) Condition of Aircraft.--The aircraft shall be conveyed under 
subsection (a) in its current, ``as is'' condition. The Secretary is 
not required to repair or alter the condition of the aircraft before 
conveying ownership of the aircraft.
    (c) Conveyance at No Cost to the United States.--The conveyance of 
the aircraft under subsection (a) shall be made at no cost to the 
United States. Any costs associated with the conveyance shall be borne 
by the transferee.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with a conveyance 
under this section as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
    (e) Clarification of Liability.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, upon the conveyance of the Navy aircraft N40VT 
(Bureau Number 163283) under subsection (a), the United States shall 
not be liable for any death, injury, loss, or damage that results from 
the use of that aircraft by any person other than the United States.
                                 <all>
```
ALASKA SEAFOOD C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2013

- 0652

DCN: 00 21 4 CBI

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
§ 1607.2 Definitions. As used in this part, ( a ) *Attorney member* means a board member who is an attorney admitted to practice in a State within the recipient's service area.
( b ) *Board member* means a member of a recipient's governing body or policy body.
( c ) *Eligible client member* means a board member who is financially eligible to receive legal assistance under the Act and part 1611 of this chapter, without regard to whether the person actually has received or is receiving legal assistance at that time. Eligibility of client members must be determined by the recipient or, if the recipient so chooses, by the nominating organization(s) or group(s) in accordance with written policies adopted by the recipient.
( d ) *Governing body* means the board of directors or other body with authority to govern the activities of a recipient receiving funds under § 1006(a)(1)(A) of the Act.
( e ) *Policy body* means a policy board or other body established by a recipient to formulate and enforce policy with respect to the services provided under a grant or contract made under the Act.
( f ) *Recipient* means any grantee or contractor receiving financial assistance from the Corporation under § 1006(a)(1)(A) of the Act.
[59 FR 65254, Dec. 19, 1994, as amended at 84 FR 1407, Feb. 4, 2019]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                            OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC.
                    FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2003

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Private Business, Inc. ("Issuer")
for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         a).      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         b).      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

         This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Issuer for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003.

         This Certification is executed as of November 6, 2003.

                                               /s/ Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                               --------------------------
                                               Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
                                               Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitie and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                       28
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: May 21, 2015 519554 

________________________________

In the Matter of SHELDON CLARK,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: March 31, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Sheldon Clark, Brocton, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent which found petitioner

guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

A correction officer received information from a

confidential source who observed petitioner in possession of a

weapon and saw him secrete it in a pair of state issued pants

that were hanging in the dorm bathroom. The weapon, which was

described in detail by the confidential source, was later found

in a different location, but the confidential source positively

identified it as the weapon belonging to petitioner. Petitioner

was subsequently charged in a misbehavior report with possessing

a weapon. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III

disciplinary hearing and the determination was later affirmed on
-2- 519554 

administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the

testimony of the investigating officer who prepared it and the

confidential information considered by the Hearing Officer in

camera, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination

of guilt (see Matter of White v Fischer, 121 AD3d 1478, 1478-1479 

[2014]; Matter of Best v Larkin, 116 AD3d 1306, 1307 [2014]). 

Contrary to petitioner's claim, the credibility of the

confidential information was sufficiently established by the

details given by the confidential source, which included a

precise description of the weapon as corroborated by a photograph

of the weapon later recovered, as well as the investigating

officer's testimony that the source had provided reliable

information in the past (see Matter of Grate v Annucci, 122 AD3d

1053, 1054 [2014]; Matter of White v Fischer, 121 AD3d at 1479). 

Moreover, petitioner's challenge to the adequacy of the hearing

audiotape is not substantiated by the transcript and, given that

it does not disclose any significant gaps or deficiencies,

meaningful review is not precluded (see Matter of Possert v

Fischer, 106 AD3d 1350, 1350 [2013]; compare Matter of Farrell v

New York State Off. of the Attorney Gen., 108 AD3d 801, 801

[2013]). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions

and find them to be unpersuasive.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D A V I D W EBB, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J O A N N E S U M I E O N I Z U K A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16391 D. C. No . 1 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 4 8 7 - DA ELE K ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H aw a ii D avi d A . E z r a , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . D a v idW e b b ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is a c t i on ar i s i ng f

r om hi s pur c ha s e of

aus e d ve hi c l e . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r28



# FI LED JU N 17 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16391 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . P eral ta v. Hispan i c B us. , Inc. , 419 F . 3d 1064, 1068 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e a f f i rm the di s m i s s a l of

e a c h de f e ndantbe c aus e the d is tr ic t c o u rt la c k e ds ub je c t m a tte rju r is d ic tio n . AF F I RME D.
§ 1329.1 Programs covered. This part includes general requirements applicable to the conduct of the following programs authorized under title VII, chapter 1 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended: ( a ) Independent Living Services (ILS), title VII, chapter 1, part B (29 U.S.C. 796e to 796e-3).
( b ) The Centers for Independent Living (CIL), title VII, chapter 1, part C (29 U.S.C. 796f to 796f-6).
```

[109th Congress Public Law 260]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ260.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 663]]

Public Law 109-260
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1 Boyden Street in Badin, North Carolina, as the ``Mayor John Thompson 
  `Tom' Garrison Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Aug. 2, 2006 -  [H.R. 
                                4688]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1 Boyden 
Street in Badin, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 
``Mayor John Thompson `Tom' Garrison Memorial Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor John Thompson `Tom' 
Garrison Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved August 2, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4688:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Apr. 5, considered and passed House.
            July 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,   Anthony N. Renzi, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K
     and all reports on Form 10-D  required to be filed in respect of the period
     covered  by this  report on Form 10-K of RAMP  Series  2006-RS5  Trust (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
     do not contain any untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a
     material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in light of the
     circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading with
     respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based  on my  knowledge,  all  of the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
     information  required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
     by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.   I am responsible  for reviewing the  activities  performed by the servicers
     and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing
     the servicer compliance  statements required in this report under Item 1123
     of  Regulation  AB, and except as  disclosed  in the  Exchange Act periodic
     reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
     agreements in all material respects; and

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing  criteria for
     asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed  securities required
     to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
     and Exchange  Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit
     to this report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
     instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  National City Mortgage
Co., SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc.,  Wachovia Mortgage  Corporation,  JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

Date: March 26, 2007

By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
    Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
No. 2608.

#### Modesto Granger *v.*The State.

Manslaughter—Aggravated Assault—Charge of the Court.—See the opinion, and the statement of the case for evidence adduced on a trial for assault with intent to murder *held*not to demand of the trial court a charge upon the law of manslaughter, or upon the law of aggravated assault.

Appeal from the District Court of Webb. Tried below before the Hon. J. C. Russell.

The conviction in this case was for an assault with intent to murder one Espiralon Devolino, and the penalty assessed was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

But two witnesses testified upon this trial, both appearing for the State. They testified, in substance, that they and Devolino, the alleged injured party, were engaged in a game of cards, at the saloon of one DeLeon, in the city of Laredo, Texas, on the night of June 12, 1885. The stakes wagered were checks representing the price of a glass of beer. While thus engaged, the defendant entered the saloon and took one of Devolino’s checks. Devolino asked him why he took it. He replied that he took it to pay for a drink. Devolino replied that he, defendant, had no right to take the check, and had better go to work and earn his *46drink checks, and not persist in “making his living at the sacrifice of his mother.” Thereupon the defendant passed behind the counter of the saloon, secured a pistol, returned, pointed it towards Devolino and fired. The ball missed Devolino’s head, and buried itself in the wall of the house. Devolino threw, a chair into the middle of the room and fled. Defendant then surrendered the pistol to the bar tender.

Opinion delivered October 22, 1887.

No brief for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

This was a conviction for an assault with intent to kill and murder. A single question is presented for review: Did the charge require a charge on manslaughter, and hence on aggravated assault?

The prosecuting witness was engaged in playing a game of cards in a saloon. Appellant entered, went up to the table and picked up a chip belonging to the witness,'one Devolino. Being asked by witness “why he did that?” appellant replied, “I am going to pay for a drink with the chip.” Witness replied, “you have no right to do so; you always get your drinks that way; you had better go to work, and not make your living at the sacrifice of your mother.” Appellant then walked to the counter and took up a pistol, made a step towards the table and fired at witness. This is the prosecutor’s account of the affair, and he is corroborated by all the witnesses. The bar tender, however, states that the witness as to the material facts, Devolino, told appellant that he “ought to go to work for his drinks, and not get his living at the sacrifice of his mother.”

Certainly it can not be contended that this was insulting language towards appellant’s mother. He had no reasonable ground to, and could not put such construction on this language.

There was .no error in failing to charge the law of manslaughter and aggravated assault. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*