alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9809]



[[Page 76672]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the fifth meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: January 9, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. (You will need a photo ID to enter a 
Federal building.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the meeting, the Workgroup will 
continue their discussion on a core set of quality measures and on the 
specific charge to the Workgroup. The Workgroup members will continue 
discussion on their work to envision and describe a world in which 
quality measurement and reporting are automated and clinical decision 
support is used to improve performance on those quality measures. This 
shared vision will be used to inform potential recommendations to the 
AHIC addressing the broad and specific charges to the Workgroup.
    The meeting will be available via internet access. For additional 
information, go to http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: December 14, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-9809 Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
## Material Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes for Molecular Identity (MI) Determination & Nomenclature

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

May 2010

Docket Identification Number

EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0252Material Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes for Molecular Identity (MI) De termination & Nomenclature

Structural features that may be important

Primary MI features: 1. Molecular Weight 2. wall/tube number

• e.g., single-, double-, multi-w alled (average, range)

• for multi-walled: concentric cylinders (“Russian Doll” ) or scroll (rolled up “Parchment”) 3. wall/tube ends

• e.g., open, individually capped, ends connect ed together in a circular or loop shape 4. tube length (average, range) 5. wall/tube width/diameter

• outer wall/tube and inne r cavity (average, range) 6. ring size/connectivity

• 6-membered (typically), but also pr ovide % (?) 5 and/or 7 and/or 7+ 7. hexagonal array orientation

• armchair, zig-zag, chiral (determined by chiral angle/vector measurement) 8. alignment of long axis

• e.g., straight, bent, buckled, branched , helical, circular, spaghetti-like

• cause if other than straight (e.g., stress or structural)

Secondary MI features: 1. deformities

• e.g., bumps, gaps 2. ring hybridization

• graphene (typically)

 graphyne (theoretically; e .g., bow-tie, linear, star) 3. agglomeration, aggregation

Other relevant information: 1. manufacture

• method (e.g., CA, CVD, PLV, HiPCO)

• catalyst (chemical identity, quantity us ed and incorporated, particle size) 2. purity

• impurity type, amount, and source 3. complexation, surface treatment, encapsulation (entrainment)

• non-covalent

• e.g., coated, modified, other 4. doping 5. uses
§ 235.62 State plan requirements for training programs. A State plan under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Act must provide for a training program for agency personnel. The training program must: ( a ) Include initial in-service training for newly appointed staff, and continuing agency training opportunities to improve the operation of the program. The training program may also include short-term and long-term training at educational institutions through grants to institutions or by direct financial assistance to students enrolled in institutions who are agency employees or persons preparing for employment with the State or local agency;
( b ) Be related to job duties performed or to be performed by the persons trained, and be consistent with the program objectives of the agency; and
( c ) Be described in an annual training plan prepared prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. Copies of the training plan shall be made available upon request to the Regional Office of Family Assistance for review by the Federal staff.
[45 FR 29833, May 6, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 29264, June 1, 1981]
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1595 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HR 1595 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. BRIAN K. SCHRAMM POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian 

5 K. Schramm Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian K. Schramm 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 27, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Antenna Software, Jersey City, NJ has been added as a party to this venture. Also Appear Networks AB, Stockholm, SWEDEN has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 24, 2004, Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44062).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 14, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 20, 2006 (71 FR 62013).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-9336 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Charles M. Lane, Respondent, *v.*Albert O. Fenn et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

*Lane*v. *Fenn,*129 App. Div. 931, 937 affirmed,

(Argued February 16, 1909;

decided March 2, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 6; 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside an order for the examination of certain of the defendants before trial. Also appeal, by permission, from an order of said Appellate Division, entered January 27, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendants for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint under section 547 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The following questions were certified on the appeal from the first order :

“1. Were the moving papers upon which the order to examine was granted sufficient to justify the granting of the order within the meaning of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure ?

*“*2. Should the order directing the examination limit and define the scope of the examination, taking into consideration the fact that the examination is to take place before a justice of the supreme court ?

“ 3. Should the examination be confined to material allegations of the complaint which are controverted by the answers and to the subjects specifically pointed out in the affidavits *\ "*

The following question was certified on the appeal from the second order: *“*Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*Walter S. Hubbell*for appellants.

*Alton B.*Parker, *Frank Sullivan*Smith, *James M. E. O'Grady*and *Elbridge L. Adams*for respondent.

Order affirming order denying motion to vacate order for examination affirmed, with costs, and first question certified *598answered in the affirmative. The other questions not answered, as they present questions of discretion, not of law.

Order affirming order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009                       
|                                              
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                              
|Dean L. Cash                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of      
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 158.231 Life-years used to determine credible experience. ( a ) The life-years used to determine the credibility of an issuer's experience are the life-years for the MLR reporting year plus the life-years for the two prior MLR reporting years. If a State requires the small group market and individual market to be merged, then life-years used to determine credibility must be the life-years from the small group market and the individual market for the MLR reporting year plus the life-years from the small group market and the individual market for the two prior MLR reporting years.
( b ) For the 2011 MLR reporting year, the life-years used to determine credibility are the life-years for the 2011 MLR reporting year only.
( c ) For the 2012 MLR reporting year- ( 1 ) If an issuer's experience for the 2012 MLR reporting year is fully credible, the life-years used to determine credibility are the life-years for the 2012 MLR reporting year only;
( 2 ) If an issuer's experience for the 2012 MLR reporting year only is partially credible or non-credible, the life-years used to determine credibility are the life-years for the 2011 MLR reporting year plus the life-years for the 2012 MLR reporting year.
( d ) For the 2013 MLR reporting year for the student market only, the life-years used to determine credibility are the life-years for the 2013 MLR reporting year only.
( e ) For the 2014 MLR reporting year for the student market only— ( 1 ) If an issuer's experience for the 2014 MLR reporting year is fully credible, the life-years used to determine credibility are the life-years for the 2014 MLR reporting year only;
( 2 ) If an issuer's experience for the 2014 MLR reporting year only is partially credible or non-credible, the life-years used to determine credibility are the life-years for the 2013 MLR reporting year plus the life-years for the 2014 MLR reporting year.
[75 FR 74921, Dec. 1, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 82279, Dec. 30, 2010; 77 FR 16469, Mar. 21, 2012; 79 FR 30353, May 27, 2014]
DEPIOFTRANSPORlIfON 

OST-2010-0046 

Secretary of the DO T 

DearSir: - -

Years ago this was tried in Mercer county and failed so a new plan was 

hatched. Don't let them vote just shove it down their throats. Let us vote 

and let the majority have a voice. 

Rural Mercer County Resident
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 20463 

December 5. 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director - Audit Division 

FROM: Lisa J. Stevenson 

Deputy General Counsel - Law 

Loren%o Holloway 

Assistant General Counset 

For Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Delanie DeWitt Painter 

Attorney 

SUBJECT: Proposed Interim Audit Report on North Dakota Republican Party (LRA 883) 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

("lAR") for the North Dakota Republican Party ("Committee"). You requested our legal analysis 

of Finding 2: Recordkeeping for Salaries and Wages. The Committee paid most of its payroll from 

its federal account and a small amount from its non-federal account, and reported payroll costs as 

federal operating activity or federal election activity and a small amount as shared activity. The 

Committee did not maintain any monthly time logs, but it submitted affidavits for all employees 

including those paid with 100% federal funds and reported on line 30(b). The proposed 1AR 

recommends that the Committee develop and implement new procedures designed to maintain 

monthly payroll logs to track the percentage of time each employee spends on federal election 

activity, regardless of whether that employee is paid with 100% federal funds. 
Interim Audit Report 

North Dakota Republican Party (LRA 883) 

Page 2 

We concur with the remaining findings in the proposed lAR.' If you have any questions, 

please contact Delanie DeWitt Painter, the attorney assigned to this audit. 

' We recommend that the Commission consider this document in Executive Session because the Commission 

may eventually decide to pursue an investigation of matters contained in the proposed lAR. 11 C.F.R. §§ 2.4(a) and 

(b)(6).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CDRJ
INVESTMENTS (LUX) S.A. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND FOR THE
THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,086
<INVENTORY>                                     36,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,408
<PP&E>                                          57,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 290,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,899
<BONDS>                                        134,955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,661
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   290,450
<SALES>                                         71,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,716
<CGS>                                           16,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (315)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,059)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Diagnostic Imaging International Corp. (the Company) on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Jagodnik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|               |                                                 
|-------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|March 31, 2007 | /s/ Richard Jagodnik                            
|               | Richard Jagodnik                                
|               | Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1516 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus 

Mathes Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. BOYD, Mr. MACK, 

Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Ms. KOSMAS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. POSEY, 

Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. ROONEY, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. CORRINE

BROWN of Florida, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. MEEK of Florida, 

Mr. MICA, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr. WEXLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MARCUS MATHES POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 37926 Church Street in Dade 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1516 IH

1 City, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser2 geant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus 

7 Mathes Post Office’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### § 211.12 Federal payments.

The arrangements made by the Administrator with an agency or hospital for carrying out the purposes of the Act shall provide for payments to such agency or hospital, either in advance or by way of reimbursement, of the costs of reception, temporary care, treatment, and assistance, continuing care and treatment, and transportation, pursuant to the Act, and payments for other expenditures necessarily and reasonably related to providing the same. Such arrangements shall include the methods and procedures for determining the amounts of the advances or reimbursements, and for remittance and adjustment thereof.
§ 286.185 What happens when a dispute arises between the State of Alaska and the Tribal TANF eligible entities in the State related to the comparability criteria? ( a ) If a dispute arises between the State of Alaska and the Tribes in the State on any part of the comparability criteria, we will be responsible for making a final determination and notifying the State of Alaska and the Tribes in the State of the decision.
( b ) Any of the parties involved may appeal our decision, in whole or in part, to the HHS Departmental Appeals Board (the Board) within 60 days after such party receives notice of determination. The party's appeal to the Board should follow the provisions of the rules under this section and those at 45 CFR part 16, where applicable.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on ) 

Freedom's Defense Fund (A09-21) ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on May 27,2011, the Commission decided 

by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Freedom's 

Defense Fund, as recommended in tiie Memorandum fi-om tiie Chief 

Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated May 19,2011. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn II, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

(T Date Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of tiie Comfnission