55112 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 212 / Thursday, November 1, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

(B) OAR 629–43–043 effective April

13, 1987.

(C) ORS 477.515 effective 1971.

(D) Directive 1–4–1–601, Operational

Guidance for the Oregon Smoke

Management Program, effective October

23, 1992.

(E) OAR 340–26–0035 and 340–26–

0040, effective March 10, 1993; OAR

340–26–0001, 340–26–0031, 340–26–

0033, and 340–26–0045, effective May

11, 1993; 340–26–0003, 340–26–0005,

340–26–0010, 340–26–0012, 340–26–

0013, 340–26–0015, and 340–26–0055,

effective May 31, 1994.

(F) OAR 837–110–0010, 837–110–

0020, 837–110–0030, 837–110–0040,

837–110–0070, 837–110–0080, 837–

110–0090, 837–110–0110, 837–110–

0120, 837–110–0130, and 837–110–

0150, effective February 7, 1994; 837–

110–0160, effective August 11, 1993;

and 837–110–0050, 837–110–0060, and

837–110–0140, effective February 7,

1989.

(G) Union County Ordinance #1992–

4 effective July 1, 1992.

(H) Jefferson County Ordinance #–0–

58–89 effective May 31, 1989.

(I) Remove the following provision

from the current incorporation by

reference: OAR 340–26–025 effective

March 7, 1984.

(ii) Additional Materials.

(A) OAR 340–20–047 Section 5.2

effective August 11, 1992 (except

section 5.2.4.2 and section 5.2.5.1

introductory paragraph)

(B) ‘‘Oregon Smoke Management Plan,

Appendix 5, Operational Guidance for

the Oregon Smoke Management

Program, Criteria for National Forest

and Bureau of Land Management Lands

in the Blue Mountains of NE Oregon

(Volume 3, Section A1)’’, effective July

12, 1995.

[FR Doc. 01–27279 Filed 10–31–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[PA–T5–AC2001a; FRL–7093–3]

Clean Air Act Full Approval of Partial

Operating Permit Program; Allegheny

County; Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final

action fully approving a partial

operating permit program under title V

of the Clean Air Act (the Act). This

program will allow the Allegheny

County Health Department (ACHD),

located in the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, to issue federally

enforceable operating permits to all

major stationary sources and certain

other affected minor sources in its

jurisdiction. The ACHD’s operating

permits program was submitted to EPA

by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

on behalf of Allegheny County. By this

same rulemaking, EPA is also

withdrawing its previously published

notice of proposed rulemaking dated

December 6, 1999. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

rulemaking granting full approval to the

ACHD’s operating permits program

should do so at this time.

DATES: This rule is effective on

December 17, 2001 without further

notice, unless EPA receives adverse

written comment by December 3, 2001.

If EPA receives such comments, it will

publish a timely withdrawal of the

direct final rule in the Federal Register

and inform the public that the rule will

not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be

mailed to Makeba Morris, Chief, Permits

and Technical Assessment Branch,

Mailcode 3AP11, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19103. Copies of the documents relevant

to this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the Air Protection Division,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 1650 Arch Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 and

the Allegheny County Health

Department Bureau of Environmental

Quality, Division of Air Quality, 301

39th Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

15201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Miller, Permits and Technical

Assessment Branch at (215) 814–2068 or

by e-mail at miller.linda@.epa.gov.

Please note that comments on this rule

must be submitted, in writing, as

indicated in the ADDRESSES section of

this document.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On November 9, 1998 and March 1,

2001, the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection (PADEP)

submitted a request on behalf of the

Allegheny County Health Department

(ACHD) for approval of a partial

operating program pursuant to 40 CFR

part 70 for Allegheny County (the

County). The ACHD will be the

permitting authority for the operating

permit program. On December 6, 1999,

EPA proposed approval of the County’s

partial operating permit program (64 FR

68066). The ACHD has subsequently

revised its regulations. These revisions

strengthen the ACHD’s operating

permitting program. In this final

rulemaking, EPA is both withdrawing

its previous proposal (64 FR 68066) and

approving the County’s part 70

operating permit program as submitted

on November 9, 1998 and amended on

March 1, 2001.

This section provides additional

information on EPA’s approval of the

partial operating permit program by

addressing the following questions:

What is the operating permit program?

What is a partial program approval?

What are the operating permit program

requirements?

What is being addressed in this document?

What is not being addressed in this

document?

What Is the Operating Permit Program?

The Clean Air Act Amendments of

1990 required all States to develop

operating permit programs that meet

established Federal criteria. When

implementing the operating permit

programs, the States require certain

sources of air pollution to obtain

permits that contain all of their

applicable requirements under the

Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). The

focus of the operating permit program is

to improve enforcement by issuing each

source a permit that consolidates all of

its applicable CAA requirements into a

federally-enforceable document. By

consolidating all of the applicable

requirements for a given air pollution

source into an operating permit, the

source, the public, and the State

environmental agency can more easily

understand what CAA requirements

apply and how compliance with those

requirements is determined. Sources

required to obtain an operating permit

under this program include ‘‘major’’

sources of air pollution and certain

other sources specified in the Act or in

EPA’s implementing regulations. For

example, all sources regulated under the

acid rain program, regardless of size,

must obtain operating permits.

Examples of ‘‘major’’ sources in

Allegheny County include, but are not

limited to, those that have the potential

to emit 50 tons per year or more of

volatile organic compounds; 100 tons

per year or more of certain other criteria

pollutants; those that emit 10 tons per

year of any single hazardous air

pollutant (HAP) specifically listed

under the Act, or those that emit 25 tons

per year or more of a combination of

HAPs. In an area not meeting the

national ambient air quality standards

(NAAQS) for ozone, carbon monoxide,

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 212 / Thursday, November 1, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 55113

or particulate matter, major sources are

defined by the area’s nonattainment

classification.

What Is a Partial Program Approval?

The approved Pennsylvania part 70

operating permit program currently

applies state-wide. A partial program

approval means that a geographic region

of Pennsylvania, Allegheny County, will

have a separate program. The term

‘‘partial’’ is a geographic reference. It is

not a reference to the approval status of

the ACHD’s program.

What Are the Operating Permit Program

Requirements?

The minimum program elements for

an approvable operating permit program

are those mandated by title V of the Act

and in EPA’s implementing regulations

at CFR 40, part 70—‘‘State Operating

Permit Programs.’’ Title V required state

and provided for local air pollution

control agencies to develop operating

permit programs and submit them to

EPA for approval by November 15,

1993. Under title V, State and local air

pollution control agencies that

implement operating permit programs

are called ‘‘permitting authorities.’’ EPA

granted full approval of PADEP’s

operating permit program on August 26,

1996 (61 FR 39597). That program

currently applies in Allegheny County.

The ACHD has adopted and requested

approval of a separate program, referred

to as a partial program. The PADEP has

submitted a formal request to EPA for

approval of a part 70 operating permit

program for Allegheny County. EPA is

approving this partial program for

Allegheny County.

The regulations for the Allegheny

County part 70 permit program are

found in the County’s Air Pollution

Control Regulations. Definitions for the

air pollution control program are found

in Part A of the regulations (2101.01 et

seq.). A list of the County’s definitions

relevant to this rulemaking is included

in the Technical Support Document

(TSD) prepared by EPA in support of

this rulemaking. Copies of that TSD may

be obtained, upon request, from the EPA

Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES

section of this document. Part C of the

County’s regulations focuses on

requirements for operating permits for

all sources of air pollution. Part C is

divided into two subparts. Subpart 1

includes requirements for all operating

permits, including part 70 sources.

Subpart 2 includes additional, and in

some cases, more extensive,

requirements for part 70 operating

permit sources.

The County’s program meets the

minimum requirements of 40 CFR part

70. Several provisions differ from, but

have been determined to be consistent

with, 40 CFR part 70, in scope and

stringency. These areas are highlighted

below:

A. Legal Opinion

The legal opinion submitted by the

County did not address the time frame

required for petitions for judicial review

and the judicial review requirements for

failure to issue minor permits. However,

as described below, the ACHD’s

regulations contain provisions which

address the requirements:

(1) Time frame for judicial review:

Although the ACHD’s operating permit

program regulations do not specify the

time frame for filing a petition for

judicial review, the ACHD is generally

subject to Article XI, Hearings and

Appeals. In order to obtain judicial

review, section 1104(a) requires that an

appellant must first file a notice of

appeal to the Director of the ACHD and

go through an administrative hearing

process. The notice of appeal, as

described in ACHD regulations, section

1104(b), requires the names, addresses,

and telephone numbers of the appellant

and his or her duly authorized attorney

or agent, if any, and shall describe

grounds for appeal. The notice of appeal

must be filed no later than 10 days after

written notice or issuance of the action

by which the appellant is aggrieved. The

remaining requirements for submission

of information by the appellant is

described in the procedures set forth in

section 1105 of the ACHD’s regulations.

The ACHD regulations meet the

requirement for initiating judicial

review required by 40 CFR part 70.

(2) Judicial review for failure to act on

minor permits: The ACHD’s program

does not specifically address judicial

review for failure to issue a minor

permit modification as a separate

appealable action. However, section

2103.14(c)(8) clearly requires final

action within 60 days for any proposed

minor permit modification. Section

2103.11(f) states that the Department’s

failure to take final action is appealable

and that the Court of Common Pleas

may require action on the application

without further delay. Therefore, the

ACHD’s regulations contain necessary

authority to compel action on minor

permit modifications.

B. Transition Plan

The transition plan included in

section 2103.01 of the ACHD’s

regulations specified deadlines for

permit application submittal and permit

issuance. These dates have passed.

Nonetheless, EPA previously approved

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s

part 70 operating permit program on

August 29, 1996 (see 61 FR 39598)

which established deadlines for permit

applications that applied state-wide.

The ACHD’s request to have partial

program approval does not affect, or

change in any way, the dates established

in the Commonwealth’s approved

program.

C. De Minimis Changes

The ACHD’s program limits changes

without a permit revision to de minimis

levels in section 2103.14. The ACHD

regulations allow a permit shield for de

minimis changes, unless prohibited by

the CAA. In this final rulemaking, EPA

is clarifying that the Act’s implementing

regulations, 40 CFR part 70, do prohibit

permit shield for de minimis changes to

a title V permit.

D. Absence of Part 70 Emergency

Defense Provisions

The ACHD has incorporated most of

the recordkeeping and reporting

requirements required under part 70 for

an emergency to be considered an

affirmative defense. However, consistent

with Pennsylvania’s program, the ACHD

program does not allow an emergency to

be considered an affirmative defense.

EPA clarified in its August 31, 1995 (60

FR 45530) supplemental part 70

document that ‘‘the part 70 rule does

not require the States to adopt the

emergency defense. A State may include

such a defense in its part 70 program to

the extent it finds appropriate, although

it may not adopt an emergency defense

less stringent than that set forth at 40

CFR 70.6 (g).’’ As the adoption of

emergency defense provisions under

part 70 is discretionary, the ACHD’s

program is not inconsistent with part

70.

A detailed description of Allegheny

County’s submittal and EPA’s

evaluation are included in a technical

support document (TSD) in support of

this rulemaking action. A copy of the

TSD is available, upon request, from the

EPA Regional Office listed in the

ADDRESSES section of this document.

What is Being Addressed in This

Document?

The November 5, 1998 submittal, as

amended March 1, 2001, requested

approval of numerous revisions of the

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan

(SIP) as well as approval of the ACHD’s

operating permit program. This final

rule addresses only the ACHD’s part 70

operating permit program approval. The

part 70 operating permit program is also

referred to as the title V program,

referencing the CAA citation for part 70

operating permit programs.

55114 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 212 / Thursday, November 1, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

What is Not Being Addressed in This

Document?

The November 9, 1998, submittal, as

amended March 1, 2001, contained

numerous requests for revisions to the

Pennsylvania SIP, including a

recodification of the regulations in

general, amendments to major and

minor new source review (NSR) and

prevention of significant deterioration

(PSD) programs, as well as requests for

approval or delegation of programs

under 40 CFR parts 52, 63 and part 70

permitting programs, and approval for

delegation of programs under section

112 of the Act. These requests have been

or will be the subjects of separate

rulemakings.

II. Final Action

EPA is taking direct final action fully

approving a partial operating permit

program to allow ACHD to issue

operating permits to all major stationary

sources in Allegheny County,

Pennsylvania. In addition, EPA is

withdrawing its proposed rule of

December 6, 1999(64 FR 68066). EPA is

publishing this rule without prior

proposal because the Agency views this

as a noncontroversial amendment and

anticipates no adverse comment.

However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’

section of today’s Federal Register, EPA

is publishing a separate document that

will serve as the proposal to approve the

operating permit program approval if

adverse comments are filed relevant to

the issues discussed in this action. This

rule will be effective on December 17,

2001 without further notice unless EPA

receives adverse comment by December

3, 2001. If EPA receives adverse

comment, EPA will publish a timely

withdrawal in the Federal Register

informing the public that the rule will

not take effect. The EPA will address all

public comments in a subsequent final

rule based on the proposed rule. The

EPA will not institute a second

comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting must

do so at this time.

III. Administrative Requirements

A. General Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and

therefore is not subject to review by the

Office of Management and Budget. For

this reason, this action is also not

subject to Executive Order 13211,

‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That

Significantly Affect Energy Supply,

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355,

(May 22, 2001). This action merely

approves state law as meeting federal

requirements and imposes no additional

requirements beyond those imposed by

state law. Accordingly, the

Administrator certifies that this rule

will not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this

rule approves pre-existing requirements

under state law and does not impose

any additional enforceable duty beyond

that required by state law, it does not

contain any unfunded mandate or

significantly or uniquely affect small

governments, as described in the

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(Public Law 104–4). For the same

reason, this rule also does not

significantly or uniquely affect the

communities of tribal governments, as

specified by Executive Order 13084 (63

FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This rule will

not have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the

national government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,

August 10, 1999), because it merely

approves a state rule implementing a

Federal standard, and does not alter the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established in the

Clean Air Act. This rule also is not

subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR

19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not

economically significant. In reviewing

state operating permit programs, EPA’s

role is to approve state choices,

provided that they meet the criteria of

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the

absence of a prior existing requirement

for the State to use voluntary consensus

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority

to disapprove an operating permit

program submission for failure to use

VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with

applicable law for EPA, when it reviews

an operating permit program, to use

VCS in place of an operating permit

program that otherwise satisfies the

provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus,

the requirements of section 12(d) of the

National Technology Transfer and

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.

272 note) do not apply. As required by

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61

FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing

this rule, EPA has taken the necessary

steps to eliminate drafting errors and

ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,

and provide a clear legal standard for

affected conduct. EPA has complied

with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR

8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the

takings implications of the rule in

accordance with the ‘‘Attorney

General’s Supplemental Guidelines for

the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of

Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under

the executive order. This rule does not

impose an information collection

burden under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the

Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. This rule is not a

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.

804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by December 31,

2001. Filing a petition for

reconsideration by the Administrator of

this final rule does not affect the finality

of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time

within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not

postpone the effectiveness of such rule

or action. This action approving a

partial title V operating permit program

for the ACHD, Allegheny County,

Pennsylvania may not be challenged

later in proceedings to enforce its

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental

relations, Operating permits, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: October 17, 2001.

James W. Newsom,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

Appendix A of part 70 of title 40,

chapter I, of the Code of Federal

Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 70—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 70

continues to read as follows:

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 212 / Thursday, November 1, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 55115

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended

by revising paragraph (b) in the entry for

Pennsylvania to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 70—Approval

Status of State and Local Operating

Permits Programs

* * * * *

Pennsylvania

(a) * * *

(b) The Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection submitted a

request on behalf of the Allegheny County

Health Department pertaining to operating

permit programs in the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania. The submission, dated

November 9, 1998 and amended March 1,

2001, includes a request for approval of a

partial operating program pursuant to 40 CFR

part 70 for Allegheny County. The Allegheny

County Health Department’s partial operating

permit program is hereby granted full

approval effective on December 17, 2001.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 01–27281 Filed 10–31–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL–7097–1]

Hawaii: Final Authorization of State

Hazardous Waste Management

Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final determination on

application of Hawaii for final

authorization.

SUMMARY: Hawaii has applied for final

authorization of its hazardous waste

management program under the

Resource Conservation and Recovery

Act (RCRA). The Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed

Hawaii’s application and has reached a

final determination that Hawaii’s

hazardous waste management program

satisfies all of the requirements

necessary to qualify for final

authorization. Thus, EPA is granting

final authorization to the State to

operate its program subject to the

limitations on its authority retained by

EPA in accordance with RCRA,

including the Hazardous and Solid

Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA).

EFFECTIVE DATE: Final authorization for

Hawaii shall be effective at 1 p.m. on

November 13, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca Smith, WST–2, U.S. EPA

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco 94105–3901, (415) 744–2152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Why are State Programs Authorized?

Section 3006 of RCRA allows EPA to

authorize State hazardous waste

management programs to operate in the

State in lieu of the Federal hazardous

waste management program subject to

the authority retained by EPA in

accordance with RCRA, including

HSWA. EPA grants authorization if the

Agency finds that the State program (1)

is ‘‘equivalent’’ to the Federal program,

(2) is consistent with the Federal

program and other State programs, and

(3) provides for adequate enforcement

(section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b)).

EPA regulations for final State

authorization appear at 40 CFR part 271.

B. When Are Revisions to State

Programs Necessary?

States which have received final

authorization from EPA under RCRA

section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must

maintain a hazardous waste

management program that is equivalent

to, consistent with, and no less stringent

than the Federal program. As the

Federal program changes, states must

change their programs and ask EPA to

authorize the changes. Changes to state

programs may be necessary when

Federal or state statutory or regulatory

authority is modified or when certain

other changes occur. Most commonly,

states must change their programs

because of changes to EPA’s regulations

in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

parts 124, 260 through 266, 268, 270,

273 and 279.

C. What Were the Comments and

Responses to EPA’s Proposal?

On May 5, 1999, Hawaii submitted an

official application for final

authorization to administer the RCRA

program. On June 22, 2000, EPA

published a tentative determination

announcing its intent to grant Hawaii

final authorization. Further background

on the tentative decision to grant

authorization appears at 65 FR 38802–

38806, June 22, 2000.

Along with the tentative

determination, EPA announced the

availability of the application for public

comment and the dates of a public

meeting and a public hearing. The

public meeting was held on July 25,

2000 and the public hearing was held

on July 27, 2000.

The EPA received three oral

comments, one of which was

supplemented in writing, and one letter

containing written comment during the

public comment period. Additionally,

in April 2001, after the close of the

comment period, EPA received a

Petition To Withdraw Hawaii

Certification and Title VI Complaint of

Discriminatory Acts (Petition to

Withdraw) document challenging the

administration and enforcement of

environmental programs by the State of

Hawaii and seeking withdrawal of

authorization for all environmental

programs, including RCRA. We have

taken into consideration comments in

the Petition relating to the Hawaii

hazardous waste management program

in taking today’s action. In addition, the

EPA Office of Civil Rights (OCR), which

is responsible for processing and

investigating complaints of

discrimination filed against programs or

activities that receive financial

assistance from EPA, has notified the

complainant that it will review the Title

VI Complaint of Discriminatory Acts

under the procedural rules for handling

Title VI Complaints. The significant

issues raised by the commenters and

EPA’s responses are summarized below.

Today’s action is not a final

determination on the merits of the

Petition to Withdraw federal

authorization for all environmental

programs in Hawaii.

1. Comment: EPA received comments

relating to the Hawaii Department of

Health’s (HDOH) implementation of

other programs for which Hawaii had

been delegated authority by EPA. The

comments generally asserted that the

HDOH could not adequately enforce the

laws and regulations of the hazardous

waste management program because its

record of performance in other

environmental programs is poor. Some

specific examples cited were that

Hawaii’s enforcement of the Clean

Water Act is poor, its implementation of

the Total Maximum Daily Load program

(TMDL) is poor, and, in general, it lacks

adequate funds, staff and commitment

for environmental programs, such as the

solid waste program. The Petition to

Withdraw also raised these concerns.

Please note, today’s action is not a final

determination on the merits of the

Petition to Withdraw.

Response: Each environmental

program is unique and must be

evaluated in light of the particular

federal and state requirements

applicable to that program. Among other

things, programs differ significantly in

the numbers and types of pollutants

regulated; the number, size and type of

facilities which are regulated;

complexity and scope of regulatory

requirements; regulatory mechanisms

(for example, use of permits and

prohibitions); tools for assessing

compliance (e.g., inspections, selfVerDate 11<MAY>2000 11:02 Oct 31, 2001 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM pfrm06 PsN: 01NOR1