alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14543-14544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05244]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 9788-2; CERCLA-04-2013-3754]

Ward Transformer Superfund Site; Raleigh, Wake County, NC; Notice 
of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(g)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement at the 
Ward Transformer Superfund Site located in Raleigh, Wake County, North 
Carolina. Under the terms of the De Minimis Landowner Settlement 
Agreement B&B Apartments, LLC, agrees to sell the property and B&B 
Apartments, LLC, and Estes Express Lines, Inc., agree to provide 
access, implement/comply with institutional controls, and exercise due 
care and cooperation for such time as they own or lease the property in 
exchange for the covenant not to sue and contribution protection 
provided in the Settlement Agreement.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
April 5, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from EPA Region 4 
contact Ms. Paula V. Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Ward 
Transformer Superfund Site by one of the following methods:

[[Page 14544]]

    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Attn: Paula V. 
Painter, Superfund Division, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 
30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: February 12, 2013.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-05244 Filed 3-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lawrence L. Bartlett, the Principal Financial Officer of Amnis Systems
Inc.(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: May 29, 2003

/S/ LAWRENCE L. BARTLETT
Lawrence L. Bartlett
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)

                                       17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative                           ( print page 62014)                        Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Aeroprise, Inc., Mountain View, CA; Antenna Software, Jersey City, NJ; Mobile and RFID Data Systems, Inc., Markham, Ontario, CANADA; Cingular Wireless LLC, Atlanta, GA; and Sprint Nextel Corporation, Shawnee Mission, KS have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 24, 2004, Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44062).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 16, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 8, 2006 (71 FR 33314).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 06-8794 Filed 10-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Date: Week of March 5, 2007.

Place: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

Status: Public and Closed.

Additional Matters To Be Considered: 

Week of March 5, 2007

Thursday, March 8, 2007

9:55 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative) a. Exelon 
Generation Company, LLC (Early Site Permit for Clinton ESP) 
(Tentative).
* * * * *
    <SUP>*</SUP>The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to 
change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call 
(recording)--(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: 
Michelle Schroll, (301) 415-1662.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http:// www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Deborah Chan, at 301-415-7041, TDD: 301-415-2100, 
or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#71353d32311f03125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e7a3aba4a7899584c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for reasonable 
accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f4b44586f415d4c01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adc9c6daedc3dfce83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-1005 Filed 3-1-07; 12:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1541 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2009 

Received 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HR 1541 RDS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

3 Act to extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small 

4 Business Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 

5 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most recently 

6 amended by section 1 of Public Law 110-235 (122 Stat. 

7 1552), is amended by striking ‘‘March 20, 2009’’ in each 

8 place it appears and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2009’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on March 19, 2009. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Willdan Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the annual
period ended January 2, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas D. Brisbin, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Kimberly D. Gant, as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



By:

/s/ THOMAS D. BRISBIN Thomas D. Brisbin President and Chief Executive OfficerApril 2, 2009By:

/s/ KIMBERLY D. GANT Kimberly D. Gant Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice PresidentApril 2, 2009


This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by
§ 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.6



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Tim Fitzpatrick, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Umami Sustainable
Seafood Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2012; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 21, 2012



| | By: | /s/ Tim Fitzpatrick    
| | --- | -----------------------
| |     | Tim Fitzpatrick        
| |     | Chief Financial Officer
Hillsborough,

No. 5503.

#### William Armstrong Hunter *v.*State.

Argued June 7, 1966.

Decided August 31, 1966.

*Charles J. Lincoln*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*James M. Riley, Jr.*and *Edward F. Smith (Mr. Riley*orally ), for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

This case arises out of an appeal to the Superior Court from an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Employment Security under the provisions of RSA 282:6-F(3) (supp). The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff’s appeal, filed in the Superior Court on March 2, 1965, was not filed within the ten days allowed for appeal under the provisions of RSA 282:6-F(4) (supp). The motion to dismiss was denied. Subsequently the defendant filed another motion to set aside and vacate the Court’s order denying the motion to dismiss. This motion was likewise denied. The defendant’s bill of exceptions was allowed and transferred by *Loughlin,*J.

The only issue presented here for determination is whether the plaintiff’s appeal was timely filed as required by RSA 282:6-F (4) (supp) which so far as material provides: “The commissioner’s decision on said appeal shall be final and conclusive as to the liability of the employing unit and / or employer, *unless within ten*(10) *days after the date of mailing of such decision*the employing unit and/or employer files an appeal with the clerk of the superior court for Merrimack County or that county of this state in which the employing unit and / or employer has his *366principal place of business.” (Emphasis supplied).

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. By letter dated February 18, 1965 mailed to the plaintiff, defendant enclosed a copy of the decision of the Commissioner and advised him that he had lost his appeal and had ten days from the date of the letter to appeal to the Superior Court. The plaintiff received this letter on February 19, 1965. Thereafter the plaintiff by letter dated February 28, 1965 notified the clerk of the Superior Court of his intention to appeal the Commissioner’s decision. This letter was mailed on March 1, 1965 and received by the clerk on March 2, 1965. It is conceded that under the provisions of RSA 21:35 (“Time, How Reckoned”) February. 28th would be the last day “within ten (10) days after” February 18, 1965.

At the time of the hearing on the motion to dismiss State’s counsel stated to the Court: “The State will admit that since the tenth day for filing fell on a Sunday, the time could be extended to the next day, March 1st.”

The plaintiff by letter dated February 28, butplaced in the mails on Monday, March 1, notified the clerk of the Superior Court of his intention to appeal the decision of the Commissioner. The letter was received at the clerk’s office on March 2. Under the circumstances here the plaintiff’s appeal was not timely taken. See *Alden*v. *Kimball,*104 N. H. 454; *Cf. H I K Corporation v. Manchester,*103 N. H. 378, 381.

The order is

*Exceptions sustained; judgment for the defendant.*

All concurred.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Theundersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           The accompanying Blackhawk Biofuels,LLC Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theaccompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:   March 31, 2008

 
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ RONALD MAPES                                        |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Ronald Mapes                                            |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Chair (principal  executive officer)                    |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |                                                    |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ RONALD  FLUEGEL                                     |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Ronald Fluegel                                          |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Treasurer  (principal financial and accounting officer) |

 

 

----
Exhibit 8.1
 Subsidiaries of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited
 Subsidiary
    
    Country of Incorporation1.
    
    Monte Cello BV
    
    The Netherlands2.
    
    Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty. Ltd.
    
    Australia3.
    
    Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited
    
    India4.
    
    Hindustan Zinc Limited
    
    India5.
    
    Bharat Aluminium Company Limited
    
    India6.
    
    Sterlite Energy Limited
    
    India7.
    
    Sterlite Paper Limited
    
    India8.
    
    Thalanga Copper Mines Pty. Ltd.
    
    Australia9.
    
    Fujairah Gold FZE
    
    United Arab Emirates10.
    
    Sterlite (USA) Inc.
    
    USA
§ 205.100 Single State agency. ( a ) ( 1 ) *State plan requirements.* A State plan for financial assistance under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Social Security Act must: ( i ) Provide for the establishment or designation of a single State agency with authority to administer or supervise the administration of the plan.
( ii ) Include a certification by the attorney general of the State identifying the single State agency and citing the legal authority under which such agency administers, or supervises the administration of, the plan on a statewide basis including the authority to make rules and regulations governing the administration of the plan by such agency or rules and regulations that are binding on the political subdivisions, if the plan is administered by them.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Conditions for implementing the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.* ( 1 ) The State agency will not delegate to other than its own officials its authority for exercising administrative discretion in the administration or supervision of the plan including the issuance of policies, rules, and regulations on program matters.
( 2 ) In the event that any rules and regulations or decisions of the single State agency are subject to review, clearance, or other action by other offices or agencies of the State government, the requisite authority of the single State agency will not be impaired.
( 3 ) In the event that any services are performed for the single State agency by other State or local agencies or offices, such agencies and offices must not have authority to review, change, or disapprove any administrative decision of the single State agency, or otherwise substitute their judgment for that of the agency as to the application of policies, rules, and regulations promulgated by the State agency.
[45 FR 56685, Aug. 25, 1980]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 63

To adjust the effective date for application of certain amendments made 
           with respect to the credit for new clean vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2023

Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To adjust the effective date for application of certain amendments made 
           with respect to the credit for new clean vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Vehicle Security Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE 
              CREDIT FOR NEW CLEAN VEHICLES.

    (a) In General.--Section 13401(k) of Public Law 117-169 is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraphs (2), (3), 
        (4), and (5)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (2), (3), and (4)'',
            (2) by striking paragraph (3), and
            (3) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
        (3) and (4), respectively.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of section 13401 of Public Law 
117-169.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr ., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ Nos. 06-2904/3907

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Thomas E. Simmons, Jr., * Western District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: September 24, 2007 Filed: October 5, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. The district court 1 revoked the supervised release of Thomas E. Simmons, Jr., and sentenced him to prison. The court later granted the govern ment’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion and redu ced his sentence. Simmons filed notices of appeal from both sentences. In Appeal No. 06-2904, we affirm the judgment of the district court, noting that counsel make s no argument in his brief regarding the original revocation sentence. We dismiss Appeal No. 06-3907, in which counsel argues that the reduced sentence is unreas onable, because we lack jurisdiction to-2- consider a challenge to the reasonablene ss of a sentence reduced pursuant to Rule 35(b). SeeUnited States v. Haskins , 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Last, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________