alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date AND Time: Thursday, December 7, 2006, 10 a.m.-3p.m.

Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005. (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

Agenda: The Commission will receive presentations on public comments 
received for the DRAFT Procedural Manual for Voting System Testing and 
Certification Program and the proposed final document will be 
considered for approval. The Commission will receive presentations from 
election officials, community interest groups, academicians and 
technology experts regarding the 2006 election. The Commission will 
elect officers for 2007 and consider other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9311 Filed 11-16-06; 11:51 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name CAS RN 73361-29-2 Chemical Structure / Identity and Polymeric Properties Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Energy Corp., a Maryland
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
William J. Bosso, Principal Executive Officer and Bruce A. Hall, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


/s/ William J. Bosso
-------------------------------
William J. Bosso,
Principal Executive Officer

August 13, 2007



/s/ Bruce A. Hall
-------------------------------
Bruce A. Hall
Principal Financial Officer

August 13, 2007
Order entered February 8 , 2023

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00886

- CR

DENNY EDWARD MILLER

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 072748

O RDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is

GRANTED , and we ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before MARCH 8,

2023

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1177 KA 12-00727**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL A. COLLEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ALLEN COLLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (JOHN E. TYO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (HEATHER PARKER HINES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered October 26, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [12]). Although we agree with defendant that it was improper for the prosecutor to elicit testimony regarding whether defendant agreed to give the police a written statement concerning the incident ( see People v De George , 73 NY2d 614, 619), we conclude that County Court gave prompt curative instructions sufficient to cure any prejudice to defendant ( see generally People v Foster , 101 AD3d 1668, 1670, lv denied 15 NY3d 750).
Contrary to the further contention of defendant, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495). The victim and other witnesses testified that defendant punched the victim without provocation, and defendant is the only person to have testified to the contrary. In resolving issues of witness credibility, we give great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor, and it cannot be said that the jury here failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded ( see People v Mohamed , 94 AD3d 1462, 1464, lv denied 19 NY3d 999, reconsideration denied 20 NY3d 934).**-2- 1177 KA 12-00727** 
Finally, we reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: May 12, 2016 521511 

________________________________

In the Matter of SHAREF REDMON,

Petitioner, 

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

JOSEPH T. SMITH, as 

Superintendent of Shawangunk 

Correctional Facility, 

Respondent. 

________________________________

Calendar Date: March 29, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose, Lynch and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Sharef Redmon, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this

Court that the disciplinary determination has been

administratively reversed, all references thereto have been

expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5

mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate

account. As the record does not reflect that any loss of good

time was imposed, petitioner has received all the relief to which
-2- 521511 

he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see

Matter of Rizzuto v Prack, 134 AD3d 1263, 1263 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose, Lynch and Aarons, JJ.,

concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without

costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
No. 2716.

#### John Burks *v.*The State.

Attempt to Utter a Forged Instrument—Evidence—Charge of the Court.—While it was competent, in a prosecution for atempting to pass a forged instrument, for the State to prove that the accused attempted to pass the same forged instrument to another than the person alleged in the indictment, and at another time and place, it was incumbent on the court to charge the jury that such evidence was admissible only upon the issue of the fraudulent intent of the accused in the transaction on trial. Omission to so charge was fundamental error.

Appeal from the District Court of Taylor. Tried below before the Hon. T. H. Conner.

The conviction in this case was for attempting to' pass to one It. S. Tuttle, the same forged instrument which is set out in the statement of the preceding case of Burks v. The State. This is the cause referred to by the witnesses in the preceding case as the cause number five hundred and eighty-two on the district court. docket of Taylor county. The penalty assessed in this case was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

Ho brief for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

Upon the trial of this case, the State proved that the defendant attempted to pass the alleged forged instrument to another party than the one named in the indictment, and at another time and place. While this testimony was competent as tending to show the intent of the defendant in attempting to pass said instrument to the party named in the indictment, it was nevertheless extraneous, and the court should have explained to the jury, in its charge, the purpose for which it was admitted, and directed that it could be considered by them for no other purpose, and that they could not convict the defendant for any other attempt to pass said instrument than the specific one alleged in the indictment. (Burks v. The State, ante, p. 326.)

*333Opinion delivered November 23, 1887.

Other questions presented in this record have been determined in cause 2To. 2715, between'the same parties, just decided.

Because the court omitted to instruct the jury with respect to the testimony as to extraneous acts of the defendant, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: THURSDAY, MARCH 30, 2023 AT 10:30 A.M.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 FIRST STREET, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. (12TH

FLOOR) AND VIRTUAL. 

NOTE: FOR THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON, CURRENT COVID-19 

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR VISITORS, WHICH ARE BASED ON THE CDC COVID-19 

COMMUNITY LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, D.C., WILL BE UPDATED ON THE 

COMMISSION’S CONTACT PAGE BY THE MONDAY BEFORE THE MEETING. SEE 

THE CONTACT PAGE AT https://www.fec.gov/contact/. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO 

VIRTUALLY ACCESS THE MEETING, SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO THE 

ABOVE-REFERENCED GUIDANCE REGARDING THE COVID-19 COMMUNITY 

LEVEL AND CORRESPONDING HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES. TO ACCESS 

THE MEETING VIRTUALLY, GO TO THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE www.fec.gov

AND CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BE TAKEN TO THE MEETING PAGE.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2023-02: Humana, Inc.

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Latinos for America 

First (A21-12)

Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as 

sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura 

E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission

Submitted: March 23, 2023
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 992 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to designate the Texas and New Mexico portions of the future Interstatedesignated segments of the Port-to-Plains Corridor as Interstate Route 

27, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to designate the Texas and New Mexico 

portions of the future Interstate-designated segments of 

the Port-to-Plains Corridor as Interstate Route 27, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘I–27 Numbering Act 

5 of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 992 IS

1 SEC. 2. NUMBERING OF DESIGNATED FUTURE INTERSTATE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the 

3 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

4 (Public Law 102–240; 109 Stat. 598; 133 Stat. 3018) is 

5 amended by inserting after the tenth sentence the fol6 lowing: ‘‘The routes referred to in clause (i) (other than 

7 subclause (V)(bb) and subclause (IX)(aa) of that clause) 

8 and clause (iv) of subsection (c)(38)(A) are designated as 

9 Interstate Route I–27. The route referred to in subsection 

10 (c)(38)(A)(i)(V)(bb) is designated as Interstate Route I– 

11 227. The route referred to in subsection 

12 (c)(38)(A)(i)(IX)(aa) is designated as Interstate Route I– 

13 327.’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 

15 1105(c)(38)(A)(i) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor16 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240; 105 

17 Stat. 2032; 114 Stat. 2763A–201; 116 Stat. 1741) is 

18 amended— 

19 (1) in subclause (V)— 

20 (A) by striking ‘‘Lamesa, the Corridor’’ 

21 and inserting the following: ‘‘Lamesa— 

22 ‘‘(aa) the Corridor’’; and 

23 (B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by 

24 striking ‘‘87 and, the Corridor’’ and inserting 

25 the following: ‘‘87; and 

26 ‘‘(bb) the Corridor’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 992 IS

1 (2) in subclause (IX)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘(IX) United States Route 

3 287’’ and inserting the following: 

4 ‘‘(IX)(aa) United States Route 

5 287’’; and 

6 (B) in item (aa) (as so redesignated), by 

7 striking ‘‘Oklahoma, and also United States 

8 Route 87’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Okla9 homa; and 

10 ‘‘(bb) United States Route 87’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
§ 1615.2 Prohibition. Except as authorized by this part, no Corporation funds shall be used to provide legal assistance in an action in the nature of habeas corpus collaterally attacking a criminal conviction if the action ( a ) Is brought against an officer of a court, a law enforcement official, or a custodian of an institution for persons convicted of crimes; and
( b ) Alleges that the conviction is invalid because of any alleged acts or failures to act by an officer of a court or a law enforcement official.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6 1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, March 1, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex. REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

- CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No Doc. No SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 1 1-15 Susan G. Essennan, of Maryland, to be Deputy Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

United States Trade Representative, with the Committee on Finance, without 

rank of Ambassador, vice Jeffrey M. Lang, printed report. 

resigned. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 2 1-18 Timothy F. Geithner, ofNew York, to be an Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice David A. Committee on Finance, without 

Lipton. printed report. 

* 3 1-19 Gary Gensler, of Maryland, to be an Under Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice John D. Committee on Finance, without 

Hawke, Jr. printed report. 

* 4 3-5 Edwin M. Truman, of Maryland, to be a Deputy Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice Timothy Committee on Finance, without 

F. Geithner. printed report. 

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION 

* 5 1-9 MontieR. Deer, of Kansas, to be Chairman ofthe Feb 10, 99 Reported by Mr. 

National Indian Gaming Commission for the Campbell, Committee on Indian 

term of three years, vice Tadd Johnson. Affairs, without printed report. 

[NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 8 1-20 T. J. Glauthier, of California, to be Deputy Feb 25,99 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of Energy, vice Elizabeth Anne Murkowski, Committee on 

Moler. Energy and Natural Resources, 

without printed report. 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 

* 9 2-22 James M. Simon, Jr., of Alabama, to be Assistant Feb 25,99 Reported by Mr. Shelby, 

Director of Central Intelligence for Select Committee on 

Administration. (New Position) Intelligence, without printed 

report. 

* S~gnifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and test~fy before any duly const~tuted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
§ 2105.60 Can you receive expedited processing of appeals? ( a ) To receive expedited processing of an appeal, you must demonstrate to the Agency's satisfaction that the appeal meets one of the criteria under § 2105.18 and include a statement that the need for expedited processing is true and correct to the best of your knowledge and belief.
( b ) The appropriate deciding official for FOIA appeals will advise you whether the Agency will grant expedited processing within 10 calendar days of receiving the appeal.
( c ) If the appropriate deciding official for FOIA appeals decides to grant expedited processing, he or she will give the appeal priority over other pending appeals and process it as soon as practicable.
# 2 ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 23-0232

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON EXAMINATION OR UBE TRANSFER 

# FILED MAY 05 2023 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court o ltbotitntene

Ariel Z. Hochstadt has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar ofMontana pursuant to Section IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Hochstadt has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Section IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Ariel Z. Hochstadt may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements forswearingin may bemadeby contactingtheofficeoftheClerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Court appreciates Hochstadt's cooperation despite any confusion that may have arisen in the process. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this 3 day ofMay , 2023. /" 7 ,4 1 f/\/ ChiefJ • e 05/05/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0232& 1 4 Justices

2
1564 Forest Grove Road Lewistown, MT 59457 April 8, 2013

To Whom It May Concern: !**~** ; - '

We are writing in regards tothe orderto show cause for Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 as to whythe DOT should notterminate the eligibility of Lewistown, MT and Miles City, MT as part ofthe Essential Air Service program. We understand thatthe enplanements and deplanements are lowforthese two cities, causing the subsidy per passenger to be above the $1 ,000 cap. However, Essential Air Service isjustthat, ESSENTIALto these small communities in Montana. There are manyfactors contributing to the total traffic in and out of LWT and MLS, but regardless ofthose factors, there ARE passengers that usethe flights and will continue to use the flights as long as an airline has a service to offer. There was a time when roads from LWTto BILwere closed due toflooding and another due tofire. The airline was the onlywayto get people to 

### 81

### L. This form oftransportation is ESSENTIALto these communities and always will be. Many industries and passengers in LWT and MLS rely on this service such as:

• Travel and Tourism • Hotels • Fixed-based Operators • Doctoring • Disabled Passengers (who cannot drive) • Hunting, Fishing, and Recreation • Livestock Sales • Real Estate • Personal Travel • Business Travel (including LWTto Eastern MT for the oil industry) Ultimately, if LWT and MLS are dropped from the EAS program, not only will these two communities and their surrounding towns be affected, butthe rest ofthe state will begin to suffer as well. The airline is the onlyform of public transportation that LWT has left. Take awaythe airlines, and these two communities will have close to nothing. No train, no bus, no airline. Please take these points into consideration before you end subsidy eligibilityfor Lewistown, MT and Miles City, MT. Sincerely, Curtis and Michelle Olson
§ 1801.3 Students eligible for nomination. A student is eligible to be nominated for a Truman Scholarship if he or she: ( a ) Is a junior-level student pursuing a bachelor's degree as a full-time student at an accredited institution of higher education and will receive a baccalaureate degree the following academic year; or, is a full-time senior level student from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or from The Islands;
( b ) Has an undergraduate field of study that permits admission to a graduate program leading to a career in public service;
( c ) Ranks in the upper quarter of his or her class; and
( d ) Is a U.S. citizen, a U.S. national, or a permanent resident of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7429** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHAWN DAVON SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00041

- CCE

- 1; 1:16

- cv - 00652

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shawn Davon Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shawn Da von Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge iss ues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies re lief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED