alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• FEDERAl. ELECTION COMMISSION

B~,} '" I ~tt I N W

V\,j'''HIN(, I()N,D l . 204&j

I

I

I

Il

It

I

I

f

I','.

I-

•I;

I

I

r

I

•

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

CONGRESSIONAL VICTORY FUND

I. Background

This report is based on an audit of the Congressional

Victory Fund (lithe ComJTlittee"), undertaken by the ~udit Division

of the Federal Election Co~nission in accordance with the

Commission's audit policy to neterrnine whether there has been co~p1iance with the provisions of the Federal ~lection ~ampaign

Act. of 1971, as amended (lithe Act"). '!'he audit was conducted

pursuant to Section ~39 (a) (8) of Title 2 of the tTnited States

Code which directs the Commission to make fron time to time

audits and field investigations with respect to reports and

statements filed under the provisions of the Act.

The Committee registered with the Federal Flection Co~ission on July 29, 1976, and is the separate, segreqate~

fund of the Indiana State De~ocratic Party. The ~omrnittee

maintains its headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana.

The audit covered the period July 10, 1976 through

Februury 20, 1978 the final coverage date of the termination

report filed by the Committee. The COITlJl\ittee reported a

beginning cash balance on July 10, 1976 of $-0-, total receipts

for the period of $11,326.09, total expenditures for the perion

of $11,326.09 and a closing cash balance on February 20, 1978

of $-0-.

This audit report is based on documents and workin~

papers \-:hich support each o~ the factual statements. 'rhey forM

parl of the record upon \'1hich the Cor-ullission based its decisions

on thp matters in the report and were available to Commissioners

and appropriate staff for review.

/~~ . ., ~,\ . .....) .- 'I••. •• ,.' "'_

... --.P-_.... _.~-- .......--._._ .1/0 __ ..._ .. ....--........-~,_...,.~_4It.......-.. ~.
• B. Key.. _PC'rsonne 1

-2-

1

Tht· principal officers of the Committee at the time

of the uudit we're r"ir. William K. Trisler, Chairman, and Mr.

William Gervd~io, Treasurer.

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of

reported receipts and expenditures and individual transactions;

review of required supporting documentation and analysis of

Committee debts and obligations; and such other audit procedures

as deemed necessary under the circumstances.

II. Auditor's Statement

It is the opinion of the Audit staff, based upon examination

of the reports and statements filed and the records presented,

that the reports and statements of the Congressional Victory

Fund Committee fairly present the financial activities of the

Committee for the period covered by the audit. No material

problems \oJi th the Federal Electicn Campaign Act were discovered

during the course of the audit.

- •• _ or 01_"_ •. _ ... __ .O.'~"" •• ' _.__ ..... _ . __ ,,,_ - ._~_.~ ...._ ......._. ._......-__ ....... .... -.-...........,.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 66197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9168]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to Clean Water Act

    Notice is hereby given that on October 31, 2006, a proposed consent 
decree in United States, et al. v. Greater Lawrence Sanitary District, 
Civil Action No. 06-11975-PBS, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
    The proposed consent decree will settle the United States' and 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts' claims for violations of the Clean Water 
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., and the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, 
Mass. Gen. Laws c. 21, Sec. Sec.  26, et seq., related to the failure 
by the Greater Lawrence Sanitary District (GLSD) to comply with its 
wastewater treatment discharge permit at its combined sewer overflow 
outfalls. Pursuant to the proposed consent decree, GLSD will pay 
$254,000 as civil penalty for such violations and institute necessary 
improvements at its wastewater treatment plant at an estimated cost of 
$18 million.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States, et al. v. Greater Lawrence Sanitary District, Civil Action No. 
06-11975-PBS, D.J. Ref. 90-5-1-1-08171.
    The proposed consent decree may also be examined at the Office of 
the United States Attorney, District of Massachusetts, John Moakley 
Courthouse, 1 Courthouse Way, Room 9200, Boston, MA, at U.S. EPA Region 
1, One Congress Street, Boston, MA. During the public comment period, 
the proposed consent decree may also be examined on the following 
Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ConsentDecrees.html. A copy of the proposed consent decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-
mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood ([email protected]), fax 
no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. If 
requesting a copy of the proposed consent decree (without attachments), 
please so note and enclose a check in the amount of $8.00 (25 cents per 
page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury, or if by e-mail 
or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at 
the stated address.

Ronald Gluck,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9168 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

I, Alan Jenkins, as Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Lease Limited (the ‘‘Company’’), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the ‘‘Report’’), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 10, 2008

/s/ Alan Jenkins
Alan Jenkins
Chief Financial Officer
Genesis Lease Limited

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 874 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to modify the implementation of the adverse 

effect wage rate for H–2A nonimmigrants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2023 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to modify the implementation of the adverse effect wage rate for H–2A nonimmigrants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm Operations Sup5 port Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFIED IMPLEMENTATION OF ADVERSE EFFECT 

7 WAGE RATE FOR H–2A NONIMMIGRANTS. 

8 The Secretary of Labor shall ensure that the adverse 

9 effect wage rate required to be paid under section 

10 655.1308 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, to nonVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:20 Mar 28, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S874.IS S874

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 874 IS

1 immigrants admitted under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) 

2 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

3 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)), that was in effect in a State on 

4 December 1, 2022, remains the adverse effect wage rate 

5 for such employees in that State through December 31, 

6 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12(ii)**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Dr. Michael Majerus, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Qimonda AG (the “Company”);2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date: November 16, 2007         /s/ Dr. Michael Majerus   Dr. Michael Majerus   Chief Financial Officer andMember of the Management Board
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 12

- 12475 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:11

- cr - 00043

- RS

- 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v ersus GAELAN PIERRE SPRUILL, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (January 16, 2013) Before MARCUS , PRYOR and KRAVITCH , Circu it Judges.
PER CURIAM: Dustin Stephenson , appointed counsel for Gaelan Pierre Spruill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 8 7 S.Ct.

Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 1 of 22 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Spruill ’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00482-CV

Mary Helen Woods and Robert R. Woods

v.

Rio Grande Valley Livestock Show, Inc.

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-4216-18-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Each party shall bear their own costs 

relating to this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 11, 2021
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00705

- CV

Don C. H OLLAND

, Appellant

v.

Beulah M. H OLLAND

, Appellee

From the 33rd District Court, Burnet County, Texas

Trial Court No. 33,055

Honorable Guilford L. Jones, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca S immons , Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 21, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal ar e taxed against the

party who incurred them.

PER CURIAM
Todd M. Smith" 

<tsmith@smcnlaw.com> 

12/08/2010 04:04 PM 

To <Elrving@fec.gov> 

cc "Cheryl D. Wilder" <cwilder@smcnlaw.com> 

bcc 

Subject RE: Response about the draft final audit report 

Dear Ms. Irving, 

The VOTE committee does not believe a hearing Is necessary in the matter and will not be 

requesting one. 

ToddM. Smith 

Todd M. Smith 

SCHWARZWALD McNAIR & FUSCO LLP 

616 Penton Media Building 

1300 East Ninth Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1503 

(216)566-1600 

(216) 566-1814 (facsimile) 

From: EIrving@fec.gov [mailto:EIrving@fec.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:47 Pl^ 

To: Todd M. Smith 

Subject: Response about the draft final audit report 

Hi Todd. 

Thanlcs for the phone call. Please send me an email expressing the committee's response (requesting a 

hearing or not). Once we receive the response, we can proceed to the next step. 

Thanic you very much, 

Lezhi Irving 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street NW. Room 741 

Washington, DC 20463 

Phone: 202.694.1205
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF U.S. LABORATORIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         515,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,931,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   607,121
<INVENTORY>                                    769,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,939,934
<PP&E>                                       3,187,914
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,461,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,884,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,341,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,010
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,967,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,884,012
<SALES>                                     25,459,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,459,345
<CGS>                                       14,589,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,033,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,185,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                   947,796
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,185,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,237,478
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>
#### § 1630.15 Applicability to subgrants.

When disallowed costs arise from expenditures incurred under a subgrant of LSC funds, the recipient and the subrecipient will be jointly and severally responsible for the actions of the subrecipient, as provided by 45 CFR part 1627, and will be subject to all remedies available under this part. Both the recipient and the subrecipient shall have access to the review and appeal procedures of this part.
#### § 1639.4 Permissible representation of eligible clients.

Recipients may represent an individual eligible client who is seeking specific relief from a welfare agency.

[62 FR 30766, June 5, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 19343, Apr. 19, 2002]
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHING TON, D.C . 20460



# DATA CALL-

IN RESPON SE For m Appr oved

.
OMB Control No s. 2070-0057; 20 70-0107; 2070-0122; 20 70-0164

Paperwor k Reduction Act Notice: The public reporting bu rden for this collection of informati on is estimated to average XXXX h our per resp onse for reregi strati on and specia l review acti vities , includ i ng time for r

eading the instruction s and completing th e necessary forms. Send comments regarding the bu rden estimate or any other aspect of thi s collection of information, in cluding suggestions for reduc ing the burden t o: Director, Collection Strategies Division (2822T), U .S. Environmental Protection A

gency, W ashington, DC 20460. Do not se nd the form to this addre ss.

INSTRUCTIONS : Please type or p rint i n ink . Please read carefully th e attache d instruc tions and sup ply th e inf

orma tion requ ested on th is for m. Us e add iti onal sheet s if n ecess ary.
1. Company Nam

e and Address 2. Ca se # a nd Na me

Chemic al # and N ame 3. Date and Type of DCI

4. EPA Product Registration 5. I wish to cance l this produc t regist ration volunt arily 6. Generic Da ta 7. Product Speci fic Data

6a. I am claiming a Ge neric Data Exemption b ecause I obtain the active ingredient from

the source EPA registration num

ber listed below. 6b. I agre e to sat isfy Gene ric Data requiremen

ts as indicated on the attached for ent

itled “Requirement

s Status and Registrant’s Res

ponse.” 7a. My product is an MUP and I agree to sati sfy the MUP requirements

as indicated on the attached for e ntitled “Requirements Status and Regist

rant’s Response.” 7a. My product is an EUP and I

agree to sati sfy the EUP require ment

s as ind icated o n the attached for entit

led “Requirement

s Status and Registrant’s Res

ponse.”

8. Cert ification I ce rtify that the statem ents ma de on th is for m and all attachme nts are true, accurate

and compl

ete. I ac knowl edge that any knowi ngly false or mis leadi

ng state ment ma y be pun ish able by fin or imp riso nmen t or b oth u nder app lica ble la w.
Signat ure of Comp any’s Auth orized Rep resentat ive 9. Date

10. Name and Title (P

lease Print or Type) 11. Phone Number

EPA F orm ____

__
#### § 1605.1 Purpose.

This part is intended to promote efficient and effective use of Corporation funds. It does not apply to any case or matter in which assistance is not being rendered with funds provided under the Act.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5623 

To establish a debt reduction fund to reduce the national debt of the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. SCHMITT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To establish a debt reduction fund to reduce the national 

debt of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy for America’s 

5 Economic Future Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEBT REDUCTION FUND. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

8 (1) FUND.—The term ‘‘Fund’’ means the Debt 

9 Reduction Fund established under subsection (b). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5623 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Treasury. 

3 (3) TOTAL REVENUE.—The term ‘‘total rev4 enue’’ means all initial bid amounts collected at the 

5 time of an oil or gas lease sale, including royalties, 

6 rental payments, and fees accrued over the life of 

7 the lease. 

8 (b) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in the 

9 Treasury of the United States a fund, to be known as the 

10 ‘‘Debt Reduction Fund’’. 

11 (c) DEPOSITS.—Notwithstanding any other provision 

12 of law, effective beginning on the date that is 100 days 

13 after the date of enactment of this Act, 25 percent of the 

14 total revenue generated by an onshore or offshore Federal 

15 oil and gas lease sale conducted under the Mineral Leasing 

16 Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) or the Outer Continental Shelf 

17 Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.), as applicable, shall 

18 be deposited into the Fund. 

19 (d) USE.— 

20 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

21 any amounts deposited into the Fund shall be used 

22 solely to reduce the principal of the Federal debt. 

23 (2) TREASURY SECURITIES.—Not later than the 

24 last day of each fiscal quarter, the Secretary shall 

25 apply all amounts deposited into the Fund solely toVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:33 Jan 25, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5623.IS S5623

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5623 IS

1 wards reduction of outstanding Treasury securities 

2 held by the public, or other debt instruments. 

3 (e) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, the 

5 Secretary shall submit to Congress a report detailing the 

6 amounts deposited into the Fund that were applied in ac7 cordance with subsection (d), specifying— 

8 (1) the Treasury securities or other debt instru9 ments redeemed; and 

10 (2) the associated reduction in total Federal 

11 debt. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS