Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 23449 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0525; FRL–9926–79– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the 

Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle-York 

Nonattainment Areas to Attainment for 

the 1997 Annual and the 2006 24-Hour 

Fine Particulate Matter Standard; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; correcting 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects errors 

in the rule language of a final rule 

pertaining to the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania’s requests to redesignate 

to attainment the Harrisburg-LebanonCarlisle and York nonattainment areas 

for the 1997 annual fine particulate 

matter (PM2.5) national ambient air 

quality standard (NAAQS) and the 

Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle-York 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS nonattainment 

area, which was published in the 

Federal Register on Tuesday, December 

8, 2014 (79 FR 72552). 

DATES: This document is effective on 

April 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose 

Quinto, (215) 814–2182 or by email at 

quinto.rose@.epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 8, 2014, (79 FR 72552), the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

published a final rulemaking action 

announcing the approval of 

Pennsylvania’s requests to redesignate 

to attainment the Harrisburg-LebanonCarlisle and York nonattainment areas 

for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and 

the Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle-York 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS 

nonattainment area. 

Need for Correction 

As published, the final redesignation 

contains errors. EPA inadvertently did 

not include a table for the 2017 and 

2025 PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides (NOX) 

motor vehicle emissions budgets 

(MVEBs) for the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS for Lebanon County. The 

Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle Area is 

comprised of Cumberland, Dauphin and 

Lebanon Counties. This action corrects 

the title of the table entitled, 

‘‘Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle Area’s 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in tons per 

year,’’ to add ‘‘for Cumberland and 

Dauphin Counties’’ and adds a table for 

the 2017 and 2025 PM2.5 and NOX

MVEBs for the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS for Lebanon County. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: April 16, 2015. 

William C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

III. 

Accordingly, 40 CFR part 52 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart NN—Pennsylvania 

■ 2. Section 52.2059 paragraph (k) is 

amended: 

■ a. In the table heading by revising the 

heading to the second table; and 

■ b. By adding a third table at end of 

paragraph (k). 

The revision and addition read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2059 Control strategy: Particular 

matter. 

* * * * * 

(k) * * * 

Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle Area’s 

Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for 

Cumberland and Dauphin Counties for 

the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in Tons 

per Year 

* * * * * 

HARRISBURG-LEBANON-CARLISLE AREA’S MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION BUDGETS FOR LEBANON COUNTY FOR THE 1997 

ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS IN TONS PER YEAR

Type of control strategy SIP Year PM2.5 NOX

Effective date 

of SIP 

approval 

Maintenance Plan ............................................................................................ 2017 76 2,252 12/08/14 

2025 52 1,446 12/08/14 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–09771 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0873; FRL–9926–19– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Yolo-Solano Air 

Quality Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the YoloSolano Air Quality Management District 

(YSAQMD) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from 

solvent cleaning and degreasing 

operations. We are approving local rules 

that regulate these emission sources 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the 

Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective on June 29, 

2015 without further notice, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by May 28, 

2015. If we receive such comments, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal in the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

23450 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Federal Register to notify the public 

that this direct final rule will not take 

effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2014–0873 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3024 lazarus.arnold@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

B. Are there other versions of these rules? 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

rule revisions? 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

C. EPA Recommendations To Further 

Improve the Rules 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

Table 1 lists the rules we are 

approving with the dates that they were 

adopted by the local air agency and 

submitted by the California Air 

Resources Board. 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted/ 

Revised Rescinded Submitted 

YSAQMD .......... 1 .1 General Provisions and Definitions ................................ 5/8/2013 N/A 2/10/14 

YSAQMD .......... 2 .13 Organic Solvents (Rescinded) ........................................ 5/25/94 * 9/4/14 ........................

YSAQMD .......... 2 .15 Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents (Rescinded) ....... 1978 * 9/4/14 ........................

YSAQMD .......... 2 .24 Solvent Cleaning Operations (Degreasing) (Rescinded) 11/14/90 * 9/4/14 ........................

YSAQMD .......... 2 .31 Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing .................................. 5/8/13 N/A 2/10/14 

* See letter from Mat Ehrhardt, Executive Director, YSAQMD to Kurt Karperos, Chief, Air Quality Planning and Science Division, California Air 

Resources Board, requesting that YSAQMD Rules 2.13, 2.15 and 2.24 be withdrawn from the California SIP. 

On May 5, 2014, EPA determined that 

the submittal for YSAQMD Rules 1.1 

and 2.31 met the completeness criteria 

in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which 

must be met before formal EPA review. 

B. Are there other versions of these 

rules? 

There are previous versions of Rules 

1.1 and 2.31 in the SIP. YSAQMD 

adopted earlier versions of these rules 

on August 13, 1997 and April 27, 1994 

respectively, and CARB submitted them 

to us on July 26, 2000 and November 30, 

1994 respectively. We approved these 

versions of Rule 1.1 and 2.31 into the 

SIP on March 22, 2004 (69 FR 13234) 

and April 2, 1999 (64 FR 15922) 

respectively. 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

rule revisions? 

VOCs help produce ground-level 

ozone and smog, which harm human 

health and the environment. Section 

110(a) of the CAA requires States to 

submit regulations that control VOC 

emissions. Rule 1.1—‘‘General 

Provisions and Definitions,’’ contains 

definitions for specific terms applicable 

to all District rules. The revisions 

include additions to the exempt organic 

compound definition to coincide with 

those that EPA has determined to have 

negligible photochemical reactivity as 

listed in Title 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations Part 51.100 (40 CFR 

51.100.) Rule 2.31, ‘‘Solvent Cleaning 

and Degreasing’’ establishes VOC limits 

and workplace requirements for 

cleaning and degreasing products sold, 

distributed or used within the District. 

It also prescribes administrative 

requirements for recordkeeping and test 

methods. YSAQMD has rescinded Rule 

2.13, ‘‘Organic Solvents,’’ Rule 2.15 

‘‘Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents,’’ 

and Rule 2.24, ‘‘Solvent Cleaning 

Operations (Degreasing)’’ because the 

requirements of those rules are now 

included in the revised Rule 2.31, 

‘‘Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing’’ and 

had they not been rescinded, there 

would have been redundancies between 

them and Rule 2.31. EPA’s technical 

support documents (TSDs) have more 

information about these rules. 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 

Generally, SIP rules must be 

enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 

Act), must require Reasonably Available 

Control Technology (RACT) for each 

category of sources covered by a Control 

Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document 

as well as each VOC major source in 

ozone nonattainment areas classified as 

moderate or above (see sections 

182(b)(2) and 182(f)), and must not relax 

existing requirements (see sections 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 23451 

110(l) and 193). The YSAQMD regulates 

an ozone nonattainment area classified 

as Severe for the 8-hour ozone (NAAQS 

40 CFR part 81.305), so Rules 1.1 and 

2.31 must be consistent with RACT 

requirements. 

Guidance and policy documents that 

we use to evaluate enforceability and 

RACT requirements consistently 

include the following: 

1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; 

General Preamble for the 

Implementation of Title I of the Clean 

Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR 

13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 

(April 28, 1992). 

2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation 

Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 

Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988 (the 

Bluebook). 

3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting 

Common VOC & Other Rule 

Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region 9, August 21, 

2001 (the Little Bluebook). 

4. Control of Volatile Organic 

Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning’’ 

EPA–450/2–77–022, November 1977. 

5. ‘‘Control Technique Guidelines for 

Industrial Cleaning Solvents’’ EPA–453/ 

R–06–001, September 2006. 

6. ‘‘Control Technique Guidelines for 

Flexible Package Printing’’ EPA 453/R– 

06–003, September 2006. 

7. ‘‘Control of Volatile Organic 

Compound Emissions from Coating 

Operations at Aerospace manufacturing 

and Rework Operations’’ EPA–453/R– 

97–004, December 1997. 

8. CARB’s RACT/BARCT guidance 

titled, ‘‘Organic Solvent Cleaning and 

Degreasing Operations’’ (July 18, 1991) 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

We believe these rules are consistent 

with the relevant policy and guidance 

regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP 

relaxations. The TSDs have more 

information on our evaluation. 

C. EPA Recommendations To Further 

Improve the Rules 

The TSDs describe additional rule 

revisions that we recommend for the 

next time the local agency modifies the 

rules. 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of 

the Act, EPA is fully approving 

submitted YSAQMD Rules 1.1 and 2.31 

for incorporation into the SIP and to 

replace in the SIP YSAQMD Rules 2.13, 

2.15, 2.24, because we believe action on 

these rules fulfills all relevant 

requirements. We are also removing 

YSAQMD rules 2.13, 2.15 and 2.24 from 

the SIP because 2.31 contains more 

stringent requirements and eliminates 

redundancies. We do not think anyone 

will object to this approval, so we are 

finalizing it without proposing it in 

advance. However, in the Proposed 

Rules section of this Federal Register, 

we are simultaneously proposing the 

same action on these rules. If we receive 

adverse comments by May 28, 2015, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register to notify the public 

that the direct final approval will not 

take effect and we will address the 

comments in a subsequent final action 

based on the proposal. If we do not 

receive timely adverse comments, the 

direct final approval will be effective 

without further notice on June 29, 2015. 

This will incorporate YSAQMD Rules 

1.1 and 2.31 and replace YSAQMD 

Rules 2.13, 2.15 and 2.24 into the 

federally enforceable SIP. 

Please note that if EPA receives 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of this rule and if 

that provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by June 29, 2015. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. 

Parties with objections to this direct 

final rule are encouraged to file a 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

23452 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the Proposed Rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: March 30, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52—Chapter I, Title 40 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220, is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(442)(i)(F) to read 

as follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(442) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(F) Yolo-Solano Air Quality 

Management District. 

(1) Rule 1.1, ‘‘General Provisions and 

Definitions,’’ revised on May 8, 2013. 

(2) Rule 2.31, ‘‘Solvent Cleaning and 

Degreasing,’’ revised on May 8, 2013. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–09737 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 22 

[WT Docket No. 12–40; RM 11510; FCC 14– 

181] 

Reform of Rules Governing the 800 

MHz Cellular Service 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) announces that the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved, for a period of three years, the 

information collection requirements 

associated with the Commission’s 

Report and Order, WT Docket No. 12– 

40, RM 11510, FCC 14–181. This 

document is consistent with the Report 

and Order, which stated that the 

Commission would publish a document 

in the Federal Register announcing 

OMB approval and the effective date of 

the requirements. 

DATES: 47 CFR 22.165(e), 22.948, and 

22.953, published at 79 FR 72143, 

December 5, 2014, are effective on May 

19, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information, contact Cathy 

Williams, Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, (202) 

418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document announces that, on March 31, 

2015, April 9, 2015, and April 20, 2015, 

OMB approved the revised information 

collection requirements contained in the 

Commission’s Report and Order, FCC 

14–181, published at 79 FR 72143, 

December 5, 2014. The OMB Control 

Numbers are 3060–0508, 3060–0800, 

and 3060–1058. The Commission 

publishes this document as an 

announcement of the effective date of 

the requirements. If you have any 

comments on the burden estimates 

listed below, or how the Commission 

can improve the collections and reduce 

any burdens caused thereby, please 

contact Cathy Williams, Federal 

Communications Commission, Room 1– 

C823, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, 

DC 20554. Please include the OMB 

Control Numbers, 3060–0508, 3060– 

0800, and 3060–1058 in your 

correspondence. The Commission will 

also accept your comments via email at 

PRA@fcc.gov. 

To request materials in accessible 

formats for people with disabilities 

(Braille, large print, electronic files, 

audio format), send an email to fcc504@

fcc.gov or call the Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). 

Synopsis 

As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507), 

the FCC is notifying the public that it 

received OMB approval on March 31, 

2015, April 9, 2015, and April 20, 2015, 

for the revised information collection 

requirements contained in the 

Commission’s rules at 47 CFR 22.165(e), 

22.948, and 22.953. 

Under 5 CFR part 1320, an agency 

may not conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information unless it displays a 

current, valid OMB Control Number. 

No person shall be subject to any 

penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act that does not 

display a current, valid OMB Control 

Number. The OMB Control Numbers are 

3060–0508, 3060–0800, and 3060–1058. 

The foregoing notice is required by 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13, October 1, 1995, 

and 44 U.S.C. 3507. 

The total annual reporting burdens 

and costs for the respondents are as 

follows: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0508. 

OMB Approval Date: April 9, 2015. 

OMB Expiration Date: April 30, 2018. 

Title: Parts 1 and 22 Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Requirements. 

Form Number: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, Individuals or 

households, and State, Local or Tribal 

Governments. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 15,713 respondents; 15,713 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 15 

minutes–10 hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping requirement; On 

occasion, quarterly, and semi-annual 

reporting requirements. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection is contained 

in 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309 and 332. 

Total Annual Burden: 4,894 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $19,445,250. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: Yes. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. The 

information to be collected will be made 

available for public inspection. 

Applicants may request materials or 

information submitted to the 

Commission be given confidential 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES