alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HEAFNER
TIRE GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           6,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,551
<INVENTORY>                                    176,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               337,562
<PP&E>                                          83,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 538,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,631
<BONDS>                                        167,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,094
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   538,896
<SALES>                                        542,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,109
<CGS>                                          406,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  538,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (772)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,198)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.11)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  .6897
<CASH>                                       3,360,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,511,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,485
<INVENTORY>                                  8,703,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,514,688
<PP&E>                                      16,501,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,149,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,829,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,051
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,567,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,149,568
<SALES>                                     15,376,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,376,259
<CGS>                                       12,745,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,157,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             401,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,183,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,183,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,183,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

Friday, February 16, 2007

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 16

CONVENED JANUARY 4, 2007

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 14 104 Carl Joseph Artman, of Colorado, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of the Interior, vice David 

Wayne Anderson. 

Feb 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Dorgan, Committee on Indian 

Affairs, without printed report. 

THE JUDICIARY 

27 19 John Alfred Jarvey, of Iowa, to be United States 

District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, 

vice Ronald E. Longstaff, retired. 

Feb 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

28 21 Sara Elizabeth Lioi, of Ohio, to be United States 

District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, 

vice Lesley Brooks Wells, retired. 

Feb 08, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

 [NEW REPORTS] 

UNITED STATES SENTENCING 

COMMISSION 

30 34 Dabney Langhorne Friedrich, of Virginia, to be a 

Member of the United States Sentencing 

Commission for the remainder of the term 

expiring October 31, 2009, vice Michael O'Neill, 

to which position she was appointed during the 

last recess of the Senate. 

Feb 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 

31 35 Beryl A. Howell, of the District of Columbia, to be 

a Member of the United States Sentencing 

Commission for a term expiring October 31, 

2011 (Reappointment), to which position she 

was appointed during the last recess of the 

Senate. 

Feb 15, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Leahy, Committee on the 

Judiciary, without printed 

report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4

COAST GUARD 

PN106 COAST GUARD nomination of Thomas W. Denucci, which was received by the Senate and appeared 

in the Congressional Record of January 9, 2007. 

PN149 COAST GUARD nomination of Edward J. Mosely, which was received by the Senate and appeared in 

the Congressional Record of January 11, 2007. 

PN150 COAST GUARD nomination of Teresa K. Peace, which was received by the Senate and appeared in 

the Congressional Record of January 11, 2007.
#### § 28.24 Information collection.

The collection of information contained in §§ 28.13, and 28.23 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1024-0050. The information will be used to determine if private property conforms to the federal regulations. Response is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with 16 U.S.C. Section 459e *et seq.*
§ 1802.2 Definitions. As used in this part: Board or Board of Trustees means the collegial body that conducts the business of the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation as specified in section 5(b), Pub. L. 93-642 (20 U.S.C. 2004), consisting of: ( a ) Eight persons appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
( b ) Two members of the Senate, one from each political party, appointed by the President of the Senate;
( c ) Two members of the House of Representatives, one from each political party, appointed by the Speaker; and
( d ) The Commissioner of Education or his designee, who serves as an ex officio member of the Board.
*Chairman* means the presiding officer of the Board.
*Committee* means any formally designated subdivision of the Board, consisting of at least two Board members, authorized to act on behalf of the Board, including the Board's standing committees and any ad hoc committees appointed by the Board for special purposes.
*Executive Secretary* means the individual appointed by the Board to serve as the chief executive officer of the Foundation.
*Meeting* means the deliberations of at least the number of individual voting members of the Board required to take action on behalf of the Board, where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official business of the Board, but does not include: ( 1 ) Deliberations to open or close a meeting, to establish the agenda for a meeting, or to release or withhold information, required or permitted by § 1802.5 or § 1802.6,
( 2 ) notation voting or similar consideration of matters whether by circulation of material to members individually in writing, or polling of members individually by telephone or telegram and
( 3 ) instances where individual members, authorized to conduct business on behalf of the Board or to take action on behalf of the Board, meet with members of the public or staff. Conference telephone calls that involve the requisite number of members, and otherwise come within the definition, are included.
*Member* means a member of the Board of Trustees.
*Staff* includes the employees of the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation, other than the members of the Board.
# PAC Table 11b

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/31/23.
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2933

___________

Quinton L. Jenkins, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Elizabeth Robinson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 12, 2008

Filed: February 4, 2009

___________

Before BYE, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa prisoner Quinton Jenkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in which he

claimed that he was repeatedly denied parole without proper due process protections.

The district court1

 dismissed the complaint prior to service of process, holding that

Jenkins did not have a liberty interest in his parole. Following entry of judgment,

Jenkins filed a motion for reconsideration, which the district court denied. Within

thirty days thereafter, Jenkins filed his notice of appeal (NOA). We affirm.
-2-

This appeal is not timely as to the order dismissing Jenkins’s complaint,

because his NOA was not filed within thirty days after entry of judgment, and his

motion for reconsideration was not filed within ten days after entry of judgment so as

to toll the time for filing an appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) (30 days to appeal in

civil case), 4(a)(4) (tolling effect of certain post-judgment motions), 4(c) (prison

mailbox rule). Thus, we have appellate jurisdiction only as to the order denying the

motion for reconsideration, which we construe as a motion brought under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Upon careful review, we conclude that the district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, because Jenkins did not

demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting relief. See Int’l Bhd. of Elec.

Workers v. Hope Elec. Corp., 293 F.3d 409, 415 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review;

appeals court does not review underlying order, and relief will be granted under only

most exceptional circumstances); Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001)

(Rule 60(b) cannot substitute for an appeal); Broadway v. Norris, 193 F.3d 987, 990

(8th Cir. 1990) (Rule 60(b) is not vehicle for simple reargument on merits).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

_______________________________
Opinion issued January 19, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00732-CV

———————————

UMUOJI IMPROVEMENT UNION (NORTH AMERICA), INC., A 

NEBRASKA CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

UMUOJI IMPROVEMENT UNION ( NORTH AMERICA), INC., A 

MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 19-DCV-258782

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 25, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to remand to the trial court 

for implementation of a settlement agreement. The appeal had already been 

scheduled for submission on the briefs and was submitted on August 2, 2022. In the 
2

joint motion, the parties asked this Court to set aside the trial court’s judgment 

without regard to the merits and remand the appeal to the trial court for 

implementation of the parties’ settlement agreement. 

We grant the motion. We order the trial court’s judgment signed on May 3, 

2022 set aside without regard to the merits and we remand the case to the trial court 

for implementation of the parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2)(B). Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Guerra.
#### Webb’s Academy and Home for Shipbuilders, Appellant, *v.*Thomas B. Hidden, Individually and as Trustee under the Will of Henrietta A. Webb, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Reported below, 118 App. Div. 711.

(Argued January 8, 1908;

decided January 14, 1908.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 17, 1907, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and granted a new trial.

The motion was made upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division involved questions of fact as well as *564law, and that the Court of Appeals had, therefore, iio jurisdiction to entertain an appeal therefrom.

*Charles F. Brown*and *George 8. Hamlin*for motion.

*John G. Milburn*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.4 Federal financial assistance, non-federal match, and waiver requirements.

In accordance with section 640(b) of the Act, federal financial assistance to a grant recipient will not exceed 80 percent of the approved total program costs. A grant recipient must contribute 20 percent as non-federal match each budget period. The responsible HHS official may approve a waiver of all or a portion of the non-federal match requirement on the basis of the grant recipient's written application submitted for the budget period and any supporting evidence the responsible HHS official requires. In deciding whether to grant a waiver, the responsible HHS official will consider the circumstances specified at section 640(b) of the Act and whether the grant recipient has made a reasonable effort to comply with the non-federal match requirement.
§ 156.800 Available remedies; Scope. ( a ) *Kinds of sanctions.* HHS may impose the following types of sanctions on QHP issuers in an Exchange that are not in compliance with Exchange standards applicable to issuers offering QHPs in an Exchange: ( 1 ) Civil money penalties as specified in § 156.805; and
( 2 ) Decertification of a QHP offered by the non-compliant QHP issuer in a Federally-facilitated Exchange as described in § 156.810.
( b ) *Scope.* Sanctions under subpart I are applicable for non-compliance with QHP issuer participation standards and other standards applicable to issuers offering QHPs in a Federally-facilitated Exchange. Sanctions under paragraph (a)(1) of this section are also applicable for non-compliance by QHP issuers participating in State Exchanges and State-based Exchanges on the Federal platform when HHS is responsible for enforcement of the requirements in subpart E of this part and 45 CFR 156.50.
( c ) *Compliance standard.* For calendar years 2014 and 2015, sanctions under this subpart will not be imposed if the QHP issuer has made good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements.
( d ) *Information sharing.* HHS may consult and share information about QHP issuers with other Federal and State regulatory and enforcement entities to the extent that the consultation and information is necessary for purposes of State or Federal oversight and enforcement activities.
[78 FR 54143, Aug. 30, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 30351, May 27, 2014; 80 FR 10875, Feb. 27, 2015; 86 FR 24293, May 5, 2021]
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Jikun Kim, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of AeroVironment, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date: August 27, 2013

/s/ JIKUN KIM Jikun Kim
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
§ 1630.12 Appeals to the president. ( a ) ( 1 ) If the amount of a disallowed cost exceeds $2,500, the recipient may appeal in writing to LSC's President within 30 days of receiving LSC's final written decision to disallow the cost. The recipient should state in detail the reasons why LSC should not disallow part or all of the questioned cost.
( 2 ) If the recipient did not respond to LSC's notice of questioned costs and the notice became LSC's final written decision pursuant to § 1630.11(d)(2), the recipient may not appeal the final written decision.
( b ) If the President has had prior involvement in the consideration of the disallowed cost, the President shall designate another senior LSC employee who has not had prior involvement to review the recipient's appeal. In circumstances where the President has not had prior involvement in the disallowed cost proceeding, the President has discretion to designate another senior LSC employee who also has not had prior involvement in the proceeding to review the appeal.
( c ) Within 30 days of receiving the recipient's written appeal, the President or designee will adopt, modify, or reverse LSC's final written decision.
( d ) The decision of the President or designee shall be final and shall be based on the written record, consisting of LSC's notice of questioned costs, the recipient's response, LSC's final written decision, the recipient's written appeal, any additional response or analysis provided to the President or designee by LSC staff, and the relevant findings, if any, of the Office of Inspector General, General Accounting Office, or other authorized auditor or audit organization. Upon request, LSC shall provide the recipient with a copy of the written record.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1. this annual report on Form 20-F of CSR plc fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in this annual
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CSR plc.

Date: 28 March 2013



SIGNATURE/s/ Joep van BeurdenName:

Joep van BeurdenTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Will GardinerName:

Will GardinerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




E-3
§ 2519.700 Are matching funds required? ( a ) Yes. The Corporation share of the cost of carrying out a program funded under this part may not exceed 50 percent.
( b ) In providing for the remaining share of the cost of carrying out a program, each recipient of assistance must provide for that share through a payment in cash or in-kind, fairly evaluated, including facilities, equipment, or services, and may provide for that share through State sources, local sources (including private funds or donated services) or Federal sources (other than funds made available under the national service laws).
( c ) However, the Corporation may waive the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section in whole or in part with respect to any program in any fiscal year if the Corporation determines that the waiver would be equitable due to lack of available financial resources at the local level.
[59 FR 13792, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 74 FR 46506, Sept. 10, 2009]