alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2507.1 Scope.

This part contains the rules that the Corporation for National and Community Service, operating as AmeriCorps (“the Agency” or “AmeriCorps”), follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Guidelines”). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with AmeriCorps' Privacy Act regulations, 45 CFR part 2508, as well as under this part.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2372

MARVA CAMPBELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ROPER ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv
- 02559

- DCN )

Submitted : May 29, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019

Before KEENAN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Marva Campbell , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marva Campbell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to her former employer on her employment discrimination claims

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Campbell’s motion for the preparation of transcripts at government expense * and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Roper St. Francis Healthcare , No. 2:16

- cv
- 02559

- DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

* There are no transcripts to prepare because the district court did not hold any hearings.
CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Solpower  Corporation
(the "Company")  hereby  certifies that the Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:  February 14, 2006                By: /s/ Robert Kohn
                                            ---------------------
                                            Robert Kohn
                                            Chief Executive Officer, Principal
                                            Accounting Officer
Exhibit 8.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GENESIS LEASE LIMITED (GLS) (UNAUDITED)
 Entity
    
    Direct parent
    
    JurisdictionGenesis Funding Limited
    
    GLS
    
    BermudaGenesis Acquisition Limited
    
    GLS
    
    BermudaGenesis Portfolio Funding I Limited
    
    GLS
    
    BermudaGLS Atlantic Alpha Limited
    
    GLS
    
    BermudaWestpark 1 Aircraft Leasing Limited
    
    GLS
    
    BermudaGLS Norway Alpha AS
    
    GLS Atlantic
    
    NorwayGenesis Ireland Aviation Trading 1 Limited
    
    GFL
    
    IrelandGenesis Ireland Aviation Trading 2 Limited
    
    GFL
    
    IrelandGenesis Ireland Aviation Trading 3 Limited
    
    GFL
    
    IrelandGenesis Ireland Aviation Trading 4 Limited
    
    GFL
    
    IrelandGenesis Funding France 1 SARL
    
    GFL
    
    FranceGenesis Funding France 2 SARL
    
    GFL
    
    FranceGenesis Funding Sweden I AB
    
    GFL
    
    SwedenGenesis Leasing USA Inc
    
    GFL
    
    USAGFL Aircraft Leasing Netherlands BV
    
    GFL
    
    NetherlandsGenesis Funding Norway 1 AS
    
    GFL
    
    NorwayGenesis China Leasing 1 Limited
    
    GFL
    
    BermudaGenesis China Leasing 2 Limited
    
    GFL
    
    BermudaRoss Leasing Limited
    
    GPFL
    
    BermudaLare Leasing Limited
    
    GPFL
    
    BermudaRoselawn Leasing Limited
    
    GPFL
    
    BermudaCastletroy Leasing Limited
    
    GPFL
    
    Ireland
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICKY RICARDO MAHABEER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-95-79, CA-97-197-7-F) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Ricardo Mahabeer, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mahabeer , Nos. CR-95-79; CA-97-197-7-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 162.1402 Standards for health care claim status transaction. The Secretary adopts the following standards for the health care claim status transaction: ( a ) For the period from October 16, 2003 through March 16, 2009: The ASC X12N-276/277 Health Care Claim Status Request and Response, Version 4010, May 2000, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X093 and Addenda to Health Care Claim Status Request and Response, Version 4010, October 2002, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X093A1. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920.)
( b ) For the period from March 17, 2009 through December 31, 2011, both: ( 1 ) The standard identified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) The ASC X12 Standards for Electronic Data Interchange Technical Report Type 3—Health Care Claim Status Request and Response (276/277), August 2006, ASC X12N/005010X212, and Errata to Health Care Claim Status Request and Response (276/277), ASC X12 Standards for Electronic Data Interchange Technical Report Type 3, April 2008, ASC X12N/005010X212E1. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920.)
( c ) For the period on and after January 1, 2012, the standard identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
[74 FR 3326, Jan. 16, 2009]
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 03/31/2010 01:58 PM
-----
|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"Gary Fromer" <Gary.Fromer@cpowered.com>                                                                                                  
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                                                                             
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"Tom Rutigliano" <Tom.Rutigliano@cpowered.com>                                                                                            
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |03/26/2010 05:41 PM                                                                                                                       
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708                                                                                                        
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|


Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708, National Emission Standards for 
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Dear Ms. King:

Please see attached, which is also being sent via FedEx for Monday delivery.

Thank you, and best regards.

Gary Fromer
Chief Executive Officer
CPower, Inc.
17 State St., 9th Floor
New York, NY 10004
T. 212-796-7101
M. 610-203-2657
E. gary.fromer@cpowered.com
www.cpowered.com
 (See attached file: EPA Energy.pdf)
#### § 2516.730 May an applicant submit more than one application to the Corporation for the same project at the same time?

No. The Corporation will reject an application for a project if an application for funding or educational awards for the same project is already pending before the Corporation.
Exhibit 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Garry Wong,  the  Principal  Executive  Officer and Principal
Financial  Officer of Deer Bay Resources Inc. hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Deer Bay
Resources  Inc. for the year ended  February 28, 2009,  fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial  condition and results of
operations of Deer Bay Resources Inc.

Date: June 12, 2009


/s/ Garry Wong
---------------------------------
Garry Wong
President/Chief Executive Officer
Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signatures
that  appear  in typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Deer Bay Resources Inc.
and will be retained by Deer Bay Resources  Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0349

Docket Number

2012-SW-058-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 206-11-127 and ASB No. 206L-11-167, both 

dated May 2, 2011.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
AFS-11-269-E 

June 01, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10279 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-20708 

Capt. William Yeager 

Vice President Flight Operations 

World Airways, Inc. 

101 World Drive 

Peachtree City, GA 30269 

Dear Capt. Yeager: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8547, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 5, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of World Airways, Inc. (WA), for an extension of Exemption No. 8547, as amended. 

That exemption from §§ 121.665 and 121.697(a)(1), (b), and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows WA to substitute a computer application signature for the signed load 

manifest required by these sections. That exemption, however, expired on April 30, 2011; 

therefore, we will treat your request as a new petition. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WA. 
 2

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 8547 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that the automatic weight-and-balance system enhanced both the efficiency and the 

accuracy of loading the petitioner’s aircraft without it adversely affecting air safety and is, 

therefore, in the public interest. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 8547; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 8547 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8547 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

David Gillion 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Djou for ) 

Hawaii (All-08) ) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretary of the Federal Election Commission, 

do hereby certify that on September 13,2012, the Commission decided by a 

vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on Djou for Hawaii, as 

recommended in the Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and the 

Audit Division dated September 6,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn n, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date ' Shelley E.G8 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3,2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, September 13, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JERI THOMSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
CALENDAR 

No. 

Ex.RES 

No. 

i 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

THE JUDICIARY 

360 886 Sharon Prost, of the District of Columbia, to be Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Committee on the Judiciary, 

Circuit, viceS. Jay Plager, retired. without printed report. 

361 903 Reggie B. Walton, of the District of Columbia, to Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

be United States District Judge for the District Committee on the Judiciary, 

of Columbia, vice Stanley Sporkin, retired. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

362 958 Deborah J. Daniels, of Indiana, to be an Assistant Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

Attorney General, vice Laurie 0. Robinson, Committee on the Judiciary, 

resigned. without printed report. 

363 960 Richard R. Nedelkoff, of Texas, to be Director of Sep 6, 2001 Reported by Mr. Leahy, 

the Bureau of Justice Assistance, vice Nancy Committee on the Judiciary, 

E. Gist, resigned. without printed report. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 4, 2013

h0225

Order 

March 4, 2013

146086

LASALLE BANK MIDWEST, NA, a/k/a

BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146086

COA: 304111

Macomb CC: 2010-002353-CH

JOEL ABERNATHY and CARMEN D.

ABERNATHY,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

VIVIANO, J., not participating.
JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI 

GOVERNOR 

DAWN R GALLAGHER 

COMMISSIONER 

AUGUSTA 

September 10, 2008 

David Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

U.S . EPA Region I 

1 Congress St., Suite 1100 

Boston, Ma. 02114-2023 

RE: Certification of Required SIP Elements Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 

~ PM2.5 NAAQS 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

I am pleased to submit the enclosed documentation that the Maine State Implementation 

Plan for air quality adequately meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) "infrastructure" 

requirements of section 110a(1) and (2) for the 1997 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS). 

As you know, pursuant to sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA, all states are required to 

submit plans to provide for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of the 8-

hour ozone and PM2.5 standards. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address 

basic SIP requirements, including emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to 

assure attainment and maintenance of the standards no later than three years after the 

promulgation of a new standard (July 2000) . 

In March of 2004, a lawsuit was initiated against EPA for failure to take action against 

states that had not made SIP submissions to meet the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) 

and (2). EPA subsequently entered into a consent decree that obligated it to determine 

whether states have made the submissions necessary to meet the section 110(a)(1) and (2) 

requirements for ozone and PM 2.5 .I 

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection is submitting this document to 

certify that its existing SIP already satisfies all section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for 

the PM2.5 NAAQS. The initial Maine State Implementation Plan was approved by EPA 

on October 28, 1972, and has subsequently been revised and expanded on numerous 

occasions . The infrastructure elements required by section 110(a)(2) are fully addressed 

by existing Maine statutes, regulations and plans. 

1 The ozone submission deadline was December 15, 2007 (extended until January 8, 2008) and the PM 2.5 deadline is October 5, 208 . The Department previously submitted its ozone infrastructure certification on January 3, 2008. 

17 STATE HOUSE STATION 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 

(207) 287-7688 

RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. 

STATE OF MAINE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: 764-1507 

web site : www.maine .Ruv/dep 

printed on recvcled paper 
If you should have any questions, please contact Jeff Crawford at 207-287-2437. 

Sincerely, 

ames P. Brooks, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Attachments (1) 

cc: Ann Arnold 

Rich Burkhart 

Jeff Crawford 

SIP file (w/encl.) 

EPA file
#### Brooklyn Distilling Company, Respondent, *v.*Standard Distilling and Distributing Company, Appellant.

(Submitted January 18, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 193 N. Y. 551.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          32,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,851
<INVENTORY>                                    338,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               800,059
<PP&E>                                       1,749,739
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,248,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,904,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          403,322
<BONDS>                                      1,258,018
<COMMON>                                         7,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     911,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,904,071
<SALES>                                        765,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               779,912
<CGS>                                          595,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (37,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (19,259)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,908)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.23)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)

<FN>
<F1>  Reflects basic earnings per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>