alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.501 Access to facilities and records. ( a ) Each issuer subject to the reporting requirement of this part must allow access and entry to its premises, facilities and records, including computer and other electronic systems, to HHS, the Comptroller General, or their designees to evaluate, through inspection, audit, or other means, compliance with the requirements for reporting and calculation of data submitted to HHS, and the timeliness and accuracy of rebate payments made under this part.
( b ) Each issuer must also allow access and entry to the facilities and records, including computer and other electronic systems, of its parent organization, subsidiaries, related entities, contractors, subcontractors, agents, or a transferee that pertain to any aspect of the data reported to HHS or to rebate payments calculated and made under this part. To the extent that the issuer does not control access to the facilities and records of its parent organization, related entities, or third parties, it will be the responsibility of the issuer to contractually obligate any such parent organization, related entities, or third parties to grant said access.
( c ) The Comptroller General, HHS, or their designees may inspect, evaluate, and audit through 6 years from the date of the filing of a report required by this part or through 3 years after the completion of the audit and for such longer period set forth below provided that any of the following occur: ( 1 ) HHS determines there is a special need to retain a particular record or group of records for a longer period and notifies the issuer at least 30 days before the disposition date.
( 2 ) There has been a dispute, or allegation of fraud or similar fault by the issuer, in which case the retention may be extended to 6 years from the date of any resulting final resolution of the dispute, fraud, or similar fault.
( 3 ) HHS determines that there is a reasonable possibility of fraud or similar fault, in which case HHS may inspect, evaluate, and audit the issuer at any time.
§ 1330.1 General. ( a ) The Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program provides grants to establish and support: ( 1 ) The following Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research and Related Projects: ( i ) Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Projects;
( ii ) Field-Initiated Projects;
( iii ) Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Projects; and
( 2 ) The following Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Centers: ( i ) Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers;
( ii ) Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.
( b ) The purpose of the Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and conduct research, development, demonstration projects, training, dissemination, and related activities, including international activities, to: ( 1 ) Develop methods, procedures, and rehabilitation technology, that maximize the full inclusion and integration into society, employment, education, independent living, family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe disabilities; and
( 2 ) Improve the effectiveness of services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.*
#### § 1631.9 Applicability of part 1630 of this chapter.

All purchases and leases of personal property and contracts for services made with LSC funds must comply with the provisions of 45 CFR part 1630 (Cost Standards and Procedures).
Exhibit 21.0

List of Subsidiaries

Registrant: Polonia Bancorp



|                                       |  |                     |   |  |                                      
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | -------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                           |  | PercentageOwnership |   |  | Jurisdiction orState of Incorporation
|Polonia Bank                           |  | 100                 | % |  | United States                        
|Polonia Bank Mutual Holding Company(1) |  | 100                 | % |  | Delaware                             
|Community Abstract Agency(1)           |  | 100                 | % |  | Pennsylvania                         

| | 
| | 

| | (1) | Wholly owned subsidiary of Polonia Bank.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

Monday, February 5, 2007

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 7

CONVENED JANUARY 4, 2007

RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

S. RES. 

NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

1

 
TREATIES

CALENDAR 

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJECT REPORTED 

BY

2

 
* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR 

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR REPORTED 

BY

3

 [NEW REPORTS] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

* 14 104 Carl Joseph Artman, of Colorado, to be an 

Assistant Secretary of the Interior, vice David 

Wayne Anderson. 

Feb 01, 2007 Reported by Mr. 

Dorgan, Committee on Indian 

Affairs, without printed report. 
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.56 Inspection of work.

The grant recipient must submit to the responsible HHS official a final facility inspection report by a licensed engineer or architect within 30 calendar days after the project is completed. The inspection report must certify that the facility complies with local building codes, applicable child care licensing requirements, is structurally sound and safe for use as a Head Start facility, complies with the access requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, and complies with National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, J. Robert Moynes, Interim Chief Financial Officer do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the Financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ J. Robert Moynes 
  J. Robert
Moynes 
Interim Chief Financial Officer June 9, 2010

---
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 66211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of FuelNation, Inc. and Sytron, Inc.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

November 8, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
FuelNation, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it 
filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Sytron, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it 
filed a Form 10-SB on February 1, 2000.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on November 8, 
2006, through 11:59 p.m. EST on November 21, 2006.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9189 Filed 11-8-06; 11:55 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 2400.10 Application.

Eligible applicants for fellowships must apply directly to the Foundation.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended September 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan G.
Silverglat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         To my knowledge, (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)
         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.





                                                 /s/ Alan G. Silverglat
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Alan G. Silverglat
                                                 Senior Vice President - Finance
                                                 (Chief Financial Officer)
                                                 November 12, 2003


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pulitzer Inc. and will be retained by Pulitzer Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       2
§ 2506.8 What action might the Corporation take to collect debts? ( a ) There are a number of actions that the Corporation is permitted to take when attempting to collect debts. These actions include: ( 1 ) Salary, tax refund or administrative offset, or administrative wage garnishment (see subparts C, D, E, and F of this part respectively); or
( 2 ) Using the services of private collection contractors.
( b ) In certain instances, usually after collection efforts have proven unsuccessful, the Corporation transfers debts to the Treasury for collection or refers them to the DOJ for litigation (see §§ 2506.10 and 2506.11).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CRAIG R. ZOBEL,

Appellant,

v.

ANN M. ZOBEL,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1866

[May 17, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Rosemarie Scher, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-

2005DR004553FH.

Ralph T. White of Law Office of R.T. White, Palm Beach Gardens, for 

appellant.

Deanna V. Shuler of Deanna V. Shuler, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and 

Kathryn M. Beamer of Kathryn M. Beamer, P.A., North Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# 2007 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13855

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 4:12-cv-00251-BAE-GRS; 4:10-cr-00159-BAE-GRS-4

HEZEKIAH MURDOCK, 

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(January 9, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-13855 Date Filed: 01/09/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Hezekiah Murdock, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the denial 

of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 

§ 2255, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court denied the 

motion finding that the ineffective-assistance claim was barred by the collateralattack waiver in Murdock’s plea agreement. 

On October 14, 2014, the United States Department of Justice issued a 

memorandum to all federal prosecutors regarding the enforcement of appeal 

waivers in which defendants waive claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on 

direct appeal and collateral attack. See Memorandum from James M. Cole, Deputy 

Attorney General, to All Federal Prosecutors (Oct. 14, 2014), available at

http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/DOJ_Ineffective_Assistance_Counsel.pdf (“For 

cases in which a defendant’s ineffective assistance claim would be barred by a 

previously executed waiver, prosecutors should decline to enforce the waiver when 

defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance resulting in prejudice or when the 

defendant’s ineffective assistance claim raises a serious debatable issue that a court 

should resolve.”). In light of this new policy, and in response to our directive 

asking the United States Attorney to address its impact on this case, the 

government has withdrawn its reliance on Murdock’s collateral-attack waiver.

Case: 13-13855 Date Filed: 01/09/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

As a result, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is 

REMANDED to the district court with the instruction to afford Murdock an 

evidentiary hearing on his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.

Case: 13-13855 Date Filed: 01/09/2015 Page: 3 of 3
§ 1611.9 Retainer agreements. ( a ) When a recipient provides extended service to a client, the recipient shall execute a written retainer agreement with the client. The retainer agreement shall be executed when representation commences or as soon thereafter as is practicable. Such retainer agreement must be in a form consistent with the applicable rules of professional responsibility and prevailing practices in the recipient's service area and shall include, at a minimum, a statement identifying the legal problem for which representation is sought, and the nature of the legal services to be provided.
( b ) No written retainer agreement is required for advice and counsel or brief service provided by the recipient to the client or for legal services provided to the client by a private attorney pursuant to 45 CFR part 1614.
( c ) The recipient shall maintain copies of all retainer agreements generated in accordance with this section.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings -

         For  information  concerning the suit filed by Harris Trust and Savings
Bank (as  trustee  for  Ameritech  Pension  Trust)  and others  against  Salomon
Brothers Inc., and Salomon Brothers Realty Corporation, see the description that
appears in the second and third  paragraphs  under the  caption  Item 3.  "Legal
Proceedings" on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. In October 1999,
plaintiffs  filed a petition for certiorari  with the U. S. Supreme  Court.  The
petition  seeks  review of the U.S.  Court of Appeals for the Seventh  Circuit's
decision  reversing the denial of  defendants'  motion for summary  judgment and
dismissing the sole remaining ERISA claim against the Company.

         For information  concerning a purported class action in Florida against
numerous  broker-dealers  including Salomon Smith Barney Inc.  ("SSB"),  see the
description that appears in the sixth paragraph under the caption Item 3. "Legal
Proceedings"  on Form 10-K for the year ending  December  31,  1998.  In October
1999, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint.

         In March 1999, a complaint  seeking in excess of $250 million was filed
by a hedge fund and its investment  advisor  against SSB in the Supreme Court of
the  State of New  York,  County of New York  (MKP  Master  Fund,  LDC et al. v.
Salomon Smith Barney Inc.).  Plaintiffs allege that, while acting as their prime
broker SSB breached its contracts with plaintiffs, converted plaintiffs' monies,
and engaged in tortious  conduct,  including  breaching its fiduciary duties. In
October  1999,  the Court  granted in part and  denied in part  SSB's  motion to
dismiss the complaint.  The court dismissed  plaintiffs' tort claims,  including
the breach of  fiduciary  duty  claims,  but allowed the breach of contract  and
conversion  claims to  stand.  The  Company  intends  to  contest  this  lawsuit
vigorously.


Item 2.   Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds -

     The Partnership continues to offer units at the net asset value per Unit as
of the end of each quarter. For the three months ended September 30, 1999, there
were   additional   sales  of  23,854.0407   Units  totaling   $23,475,000   and
contributions  by the General  Partner  representing  243.8752 Unit  equivalents
totaling $240,000.

     Proceeds  from the sale of  additional  Units  are used in the  trading  of
commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts.

Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None
Item 5.   Other Information - None
Item 6.   (a) Exhibits - None
          (b) Reports on Form 8-K - None
                              16
§ 2516.120 Who may apply for funding a subgrant? Entities that may apply for a subgrant from a State, Indian Tribe, or community-based entity are: ( a ) A qualified organization, Indian Tribe, Territory, local educational agency, for-profit business, private elementary school or secondary school, or institution of higher education for a grant from a State for planning and building the capacity of school-based service-learning programs.
( b ) A local partnership, for a grant from a State to implement, operate, or expand a school-based service learning program. ( 1 ) The local partnership must include an LEA and one or more community partners. The local partnership may include a private for-profit business, or private elementary or secondary school, or an Indian Tribe (except that an Indian Tribe distributing funds to a project under this paragraph is not eligible to be part of the partnership operating that project).
( 2 ) The community partners must include a public or private nonprofit organization that has demonstrated expertise in the provision of services to meet educational, public safety, human, or environmental needs; will make projects available for participants, who must be students; and was in existence at least one year before the date on which the organization submitted an application under this part.
( c ) An LEA or Indian Tribe for planning school-based service-learning programs involving paying, recruiting, and supporting service-learning coordinators.
( d ) An LEA, local partnership, or public or private nonprofit organization for a grant from a State to implement, operate, or expand an adult volunteer program. The local partnership must include an LEA and one or more public or private nonprofit organizations, other educational agencies, or an Indian Tribe (except that an Indian Tribe distributing funds under this paragraph is not eligible to be a recipient of those funds) that coordinate and operate projects for participants who must be students.
( e ) An eligible entity for a grant from a State or Indian Tribe to carry out civic engagement activities.
#### § 2506.55 How will the Corporation collect debts through Administrative Wage Garnishment?

The Corporation will collect debts through Administrative Wage Garnishment in accordance with the Administrative Wage Garnishment regulations issued by the Treasury. The Corporation adopts, for purposes of this subpart, the Treasury's Administrative Wage Garnishment regulations in 31 CFR 285.11. This procedure allows the Corporation to garnish the disposable pay of a debtor without first obtaining a court order.