### SJERVED 

## JAN-UAR_Y 13? 2012**、町, ~**  ,,' ," _J 

### .U03. DEPARTl \lfENT OF**‘乱也 NSPORTATION**  OFFICE OF HEA 

### Rl NGS ASHINGTON 

### , DC

DOCKET NO. FAA-2011-1009 (Civil Penalty Proceeding) IN THE MATTER OF: QUENTON T.**BRO 矶吁过**  Respondent**ORDERTOSHO 'CAUSE** **'HYMOTION** TO DEEM ALLEGATIONS ADMITTED SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED

On December 8 , 2011 an Order Setting Third Litigation Scheduling Conference
was filed and served on all parties' addresses ofrecord. This Order**required ,田** **nong** other things 

### , for Quenton T. Brown 

### , the pro se Respondent 

### , to file a written An swer on or before December 29 , 2011. The Order required the parties to informally consult on January 5 , 2012**wi each**  other regarding settlement and litigation**proced es.**  The Order also required the parties to**appe for**  a Third Litigation Scheduling Conference on Tuesday 

### , January 10 

### , 2012 at 3:00pm Eastem Standard Time (EST) prior to the Conference. This Third Conference had been mutually set by the parties during the December 7 

### , 2011 Second Litigation Conference.**吨~ 叩.** **·蜀擅自** .. On December 29 

### , 2011 

### , the December 8 

### , 2011 Order that had been sent to the Respondent' s new address of record (in Melboume , FL)**,臼 retumed**  as undeliverable. That same day 

### , on December 29 

### , 2011 

### , the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) called the Respo l1 dent at his telephone l1 umber of record and left a message on the Respondent' s answering ml!chine. In this message the OAH reported the retumed mail , requested an accurate addr 

### .ê ss 

### , asked for a fax numb

, er to use in oider to fax the returned Order to the Respondent

### , and provided a reminder of the Third 

### Li tigation Scheduling Conference 

### , set for January 10 

### , 2012 at 3:00pm EST. That**ne** day 

### , on December 29 

### , 2011 

### , the OAH re-mailed the December 8 

### , 2011 Order to the Respondent at his former mailing address of record (in O

### r1 ando 

### , Florida) 

### , since the Respondent had noted during the December 7 

### , 2011 Second 

### Li tigatio l1 Conference that he continued to pick up mail at that former address on a weekly basis.**le** Respondent did not respond to the OAH's December 29 , 2011 telephone message. The Respondent did not file a written Answer on or before December 29 

### , 2011 

### , or afterwards.

On January 9 

### , 2012 the Complainant 

### , the FAA 

### , filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted.

Page 1 of2On January 10 

### , 2012 the parties were contacted by the OAH to.convene for the Third Litigation Scheduling Conference. The Respondent did not answer his telephone , and failed to appear for the Conference. During this Third Conference , the FAA was advised that the OAH mailing ofthe December 8 , 2011 Order to the Respondent' s new address ofrecord had been returned as undeliverable. The FAA was directed to re-serve its Motion to the Respondent's f Olmer address ofrecord (in Orlando , FL) , to ensure that the Respondent had notice of the Motion.

On January 12 , 2012 the FAA re-filed it Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted , and re-served the Motion on the Respondent at both his new address ofrecord (in Melbourne 

### , FL) and his former address ofrecord (i n Orlando 

### , FL).**咱It** Is Hereby Ordered:

1. OnorbeforeJanuary27 

## , 2012 

### , andpursuantto 14C.F. 

### R.**~13.211** and 14**丑R. ~13.218** **,** the Respondent shall file a written Answer to the Order to Show**矶'hy** Motion.to Deem Allegations Admitted Should Not Be Granted. 1n this 

### An swer the Respondent shall respond to each assertion made in the FAA' s Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted , and explain why he has not filed an 

### An swer as previously ordered by this administrative court.

2. The Respondent must also attach a written Answer to the Notice of Complaint in his Answer to the Order to Show Cause.

3. The Respondent must also affirmatively give Notice ofa working mailing address 

### , recognized by the U.S. Post Office 

### , as his address ofrecord. Absent such Notice 

### , the Respondent's only mailing address that remains serviceable is his former address of record (in Orlando ,**Florid 时,**  at**whtch .e**  Respondent has orally affirmed he still receives mai 

### l.

4. 

### The Respondent shall serve his written 

### An swer to the Order to Show Cause 

### , his 

### An swer to the Notice ofComplaint

### , and his Notice ofa working mailing address 

### , by U.S.. mail to all ihe parties listed in the attached Service 

### Li st herein. The Respondent shall also provide a courtesy copy of these documents to the undersigned Judge by fax (202-266-366-7536).


### 5. The FAA's Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted is reserved until January 27 

### , 2012.

Attachment: Service List

Page 2 of2

## ,

Federal A viation Administration 800 Independence Avenue , S.W. Washington , DC 20591 SERVICE LIST

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk , AGC -4 30**Wilbur 'right**  Building-Suite**2WI000**

Quenton 

### T. Brown , Respondent 622 W. Miller Street Orlando FL 32805-4502 TEL: 321-594-8501 ONECOPY

Mark G. Camacho ,**Compl in** **'s** Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Central Region , ACE-7 Federal A viation Administration 901 Locust, Room 506 Kansas City MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3765 FAX: 816-329-3771

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan , Administrative Law Judge 

### U. S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings , M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue , S.E: Washington , DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS NO.**FAA-2011 009**  (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mai l. For service in person or by expedited courier , use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S**DC2 0591;**  Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk , AGC -4 30.