alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 79 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 79

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment 
                          Advice Fiduciary''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2024

  Mr. Budd (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Manchin, Mr. 
 Cramer, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Risch, Mr. 
 Lankford, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
 Daines, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mrs. 
  Britt, and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following joint resolution; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment 
                          Advice Fiduciary''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Retirement 
Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary'' (89 Fed. 
Reg. 32122 (April 25, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
## Proposed Projects

*Title:*                     National Directory of New Hires.                

*OMB No.:*                     0970-0166.                

*Description:*Public Law 104-193, the “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,” requires the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) to operate a National Directory of New Hires (NDNH) to improve the ability of State child support enforcement agencies to locate noncustodial parents and collect child support across State lines. The law requires employers to report newly hired employees to States. States are then required to periodically transmit new hire data received from employers to the NDNH, and to transmit wage and unemployment compensation claims data to the NDNH on a quarterly basis. Federal agencies are required to report new hires and quarterly wage data directly to the NDNH. All data is transmitted to the NDNH electronically.                

*Respondents:*                     Employers, State Child Support Enforcement Agencies, State Workforce Agencies, Federal Agencies.                

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                     760,828.                 

                    In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. E-mail address:                     *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov*. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection.                

The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication.

Dated: November 28, 2006.

Robert Sargis,

Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 06-9488 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
®T G

1770 Commerce Park Drive

El Paso, Texas 79912

(915) 877-4380

PSI

"

t, . II i W

PRODUc S, INC. A SLIInc. Company

April 6, 2000

US Department of Energy

Attn: Brenda Edwards-Jones

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

EE-41

1000 Independence Ave, S W

Washington, DC 20585-0212

RE: Docket No. EE-RM-97-500 Public Hearing ; Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts

Dear Ms Ewards-Jones:

Below is a statement from Power Lighting Products for the April 18, 2000 Public Hearing on

Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts. If you need more information, I can be reached at 915-877-1464 (phone)

or 915-877-1640 (fax).

Power Lighting Products, Statement for the April 18, 2000 DOE Public Hearing

I am Thomas Schooler representing Power Lighting Products, also known as Sli-Lighting, and a

member of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA).

Power Lighting Products believes that the current Proposed Ballast Rule satisfies all of the legal

requirements and adequately addresses all of the stakeholders concerns. PLP supports the comments of

the Ballast Section of NEMA by Norm Grimshaw and also supports the Proposed Ballast Rule

submitted by the Joint Stakeholders and outlined by the DOE in the March 15, 2000 Federal Register

Notice. Therefore, Power Lighting Products requests the Department of Energy to adopt this Proposed

Rule as the Final Rule.

Thomas R. Schooler

Product Introduction Manager

file: 000406TS

1

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 99GG

LIGHTING 

1770 Commerce Park Drive 

EI Paso, Texas 79912 

(915) 877-4380 

US Department of Energy 

Attn: Brenda Edwards-Jones 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

EE-41 

1000 Independence Ave, S W 

Washington, DC 20585-0212 

1bGG PY.WE~ 

PRODUCTS, INC. A SLi Inc. Company 

April 6, 2000 

RE: Docket No. EE-RM-97-500 Public Hearing; Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts 

Dear Ms Ewards-Jones: 

Below is a statement from Power Lighting Products for the April 18, 2000 Public Hearing on 

Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts. If you need more information, I can be reached at 915-877-1464 (phone) 

or 915-877-1640 (fax). 

Power Lighting Products, Statement for the April 18, 2000 DOE Public Hearing 

I am Thomas Schooler representing Power Lighting Products, also known as Sli-Lighting, and a 

member ofthe National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). 

Power Lighting Products believes that the current Proposed Ballast Rule satisfies all of the legal 

requirements and adequately addresses all of the stakeholders concerns. PLP supports the comments of 

the Ballast Section of NEMA by Norm Grimshaw and also supports the Proposed Ballast Rule 

submitted by the Joint Stakeholders and outlined by the DOE in the March 15, 2000 Federal Register 

Notice. Therefore, Power Lighting Products requests the Department of Energy to adopt this Proposed 

Rule as the Final Rule. 

Thomas R. Schooler 

Product Introduction Manager 

file: 000406TS
§ 1612.3 Prohibited legislative and administrative activities. ( a ) Except as provided in §§ 1612.5 and 1612.6, recipients shall not attempt to influence: ( 1 ) The passage or defeat of any legislation or constitutional amendment;
( 2 ) Any initiative, or any referendum or any similar procedure of the Congress, any State legislature, any local council, or any similar governing body acting in any legislative capacity;
( 3 ) Any provision in a legislative measure appropriating funds to, or defining or limiting the functions or authority of, the recipient or the Corporation; or,
( 4 ) The conduct of oversight proceedings concerning the recipient or the Corporation.
( b ) Except as provided in §§ 1612.5 and 1612.6, recipients shall not participate in or attempt to influence any rulemaking, or attempt to influence the issuance, amendment or revocation of any executive order.
( c ) Recipients shall not use any funds to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone communication, letter, printed or written matter, administrative expense, or related expense associated with an activity prohibited in paragraphs (a) and (b) in this section.
Case 1:16-cv-00259-BAH Document 55 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 1
Hardesty 

P064.)1. 

Parraguirre 

J. 

J. 

1'111 EZWINS 

321, 324 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err 

in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Zel Norman 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# PAC Table 9b

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/31/23.
Exhibit 31.1
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert C. Woodworth, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pulitzer Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 6, 2004   /s/ Robert C. Woodworth    Robert C. Woodworth  President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 170
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 170 appear at 80 FR 62755, Oct. 16, 2015.

§ 170.535 ONC-ACB and ONC-ATL application reconsideration. ( a ) *Basis for reconsideration request.* An applicant may request that the National Coordinator reconsider a denial notice only if the applicant can demonstrate that clear, factual errors were made in the review of its application and that the errors' correction could lead to the applicant obtaining ONC-ACB or ONC-ATL status.
( b ) *Submission requirement.* An applicant is required to submit, within 15 days of receipt of a denial notice, a written statement to the National Coordinator contesting the decision to deny its application and explaining with sufficient documentation what factual error(s) it believes can account for the denial. If the National Coordinator does not receive the applicant's reconsideration request within the specified timeframe, its reconsideration request may be rejected.
( c ) *Reconsideration request review.* If the National Coordinator receives a timely reconsideration request, the National Coordinator is permitted up to 15 days from the date of receipt to review the information submitted by the applicant and issue a decision.
( d ) *Decision.* ( 1 ) If the National Coordinator determines that clear, factual errors were made during the review of the application and that correction of the errors would remove all identified deficiencies, the applicant's authorized representative will be notified of the National Coordinator's determination and the applicant's successful achievement of ONC-ACB or ONC-ATL status.
( 2 ) If, after reviewing an applicant's reconsideration request, the National Coordinator determines that the applicant did not identify factual errors or that the correction of the factual errors would not remove all identified deficiencies in the application, the National Coordinator may reject the applicant's reconsideration request.
( 3 ) *Final decision.* A reconsideration decision issued by the National Coordinator is final and not subject to further review.
[76 FR 1325, Dec. 7, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 72466, Oct. 19, 2016]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SPSS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER
31,  1997 AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND
TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000869570
<NAME>                        SPSS


<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          0               8,079
<SECURITIES>                    0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0              29,586
<ALLOWANCES>                    0               1,714
<INVENTORY>                     0               2,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0              41,282
<PP&E>                          0              28,403
<DEPRECIATION>                  0              18,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0              62,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0              27,128
<BONDS>                         0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                0
<PREFERRED>                     0                0
<COMMON>                        0                  88
<OTHER-SE>                      0              32,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0              62,745
<SALES>                        29,960         110,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               29,960         110,644
<CGS>                           2,568           9,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,568           9,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                22,101         93,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   298            447
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  60            204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  5,019          6,824
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,606          3,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              3,413          3,582
<DISCONTINUED>                       0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0              0
<CHANGES>                            0              0
<NET-INCOME>                     3,413          3,582
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.39           0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0.36           0.37



</TABLE>
ID # Committee/Individual Filer Date Amount Image Report Amendment

Support / 

Oppose Candidate

C90003468 GOLAND, MICHAEL IE - Person or Group 3/14/1984 Not Keyed 84020063416 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

C90003468 GOLAND, MICHAEL IE - Person or Group 3/15/1984 Not Keyed 84020062488 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

C90003468 GOLAND, MICHAEL IE - Person or Group 3/15/1984 Not Keyed 84020062487 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

C90003468 GOLAND, MICHAEL IE - Person or Group 3/16/1984 Not Keyed 84020062599 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

C90003468 GOLAND, MICHAEL IE - Person or Group 10/23/1984 Not Keyed 84020234055 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

C90003468 GOLAND, MICHAEL IE - Person or Group 10/25/1984 Not Keyed 84020252690 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

C90003617 TED TEMPLE IE - Person or Group 11/1/1984 Not Keyed 84033481276 MS-24 Not Keyed Not Keyed Not Keyed

Independent Expenditure Table 2

Persons or Groups Reporting Independent Expenditures

from January 1, 1983 through December 31, 1984

The independent expenditures below were reported by persons other than political committees on FEC Form 5 within the given reporting period. Persons other than political committees are required to 

submit 24- and 48-hour notices of these communications, but must also report them on their next quarterly, monthly or election-sensitive report. The table below shows all FEC Form 5 submissions, 

including both original filings and all subsequent amendments. Simply summing all of these expenditures will generate an inflated total amount for this reporting period.
#### § 1220.3-3 Procedure.

Immediately upon the receipt by a volunteer of any court papers or administrative orders making a party to any proceeding covered under § 1220.3-1 or § 1220.3-2, the volunteer shall immediately notify his sponsor who in turn shall notify the appropriate Corporation for National and Community Service state office. The procedures referred to in § 1220.2-3(c) through (e) shall thereafter be followed as appropriate.

[80 FR 63459, Oct. 20, 2015]
IIA 

★(Star Print)

Calendar No. 340 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 62 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service relating to ‘‘Importation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2024 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. ROUNDS, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BROWN, 

Mr. CRAMER, Ms. LUMMIS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. 

RICKETTS, and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

MARCH 11, 2024 

Committee discharged by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service relating 

to ‘‘Importation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the AniVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:13 Mar 12, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ62.PCS SJ62

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 62 PCS1S 

1 mal and Plant Health Inspection Service relating to ‘‘Im2 portation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 

3 77883 (November 14, 2023)), and such rule shall have 

4 no force or effect. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 340 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 62 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapFresh Beef From Paraguay’’. spection Service relating to ‘‘Importation of submitted by the Animal and Plant Health In- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

MARCH 11, 2024 

Committee discharged by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 2400.11 Faculty representatives.

Each college and university that chooses to do so may annually appoint or reappoint a faculty representative who will be asked to identify and recruit fellowship applicants on campus, publicize the annual competition on campus, and otherwise assist eligible candidates in preparation for applying. In order to elicit the appointment of faculty representatives, the Foundation will each year request the head of each college and university campus to appoint or reappoint a faculty representative and to provide the Foundation with the name, business address, and business telephone number of a member of its faculty representative on forms provided for that purpose.
§ 1322.11 Purpose of services allotments under Title VI. ( a ) Title VI of the Act authorizes the distribution of Federal funds to Tribal organizations and a Hawaiian Native grantee for the following categories of services: ( 1 ) Supportive services;
( 2 ) Nutrition services; and
( 3 ) Family caregiver support program services.
( b ) Funds authorized under these categories are for the purpose of assisting a Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee to develop or enhance comprehensive and coordinated community-based systems for older Native Americans and family caregivers.
§ 1602.5 Public reading room. ( a ) LSC will maintain a public reading room at its offices at 3333 K St. NW., Washington, DC 20007. This room will be supervised and will be open to the public during LSC's regular business hours. Procedures for use of the public reading room are described in § 1602.6. LSC also maintains an electronic public reading room that may be accessed at *http://www.lsc.gov/about-lsc/foia/foia-electronic-public-reading-room .*
( b ) Subject to the limitation stated in paragraph (c) of this section, LSC will make available for public inspection in its electronic public reading room the records described in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2).
( c ) Records required by FOIA to be available in the public reading room may be exempt from mandatory disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b). LSC will not make such records available in the public reading room. LSC may edit other records maintained in the reading room by redacting details about individuals to prevent clearly unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. In such cases, LSC will attach a full explanation of the redactions to the record. LSC will indicate the extent of the redactions unless doing so would harm an interest protected by the exemption under which the redactions are made. If technically feasible, LSC will indicate the extent of the redactions at the place in the record where the redactions were made.