alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  OF U.S.  LABORATORIES,  INC, AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30,  1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2589888
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3752187
<ALLOWANCES>                                   83705
<INVENTORY>                                    373506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6890096
<PP&E>                                         1786069
<DEPRECIATION>                                 904696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9646223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2922783
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32000
<OTHER-SE>                                     6227059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9646223
<SALES>                                        6984701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6984701
<CGS>                                          3551576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6667424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (68820)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                324045
<INCOME-TAX>                                   129618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   194427
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07


</TABLE>
#### § 144.204 Applicability of regulations.

The regulations contained in this subpart for reporting data apply only to those insurers that have issued qualified long-term care insurance policies to individuals under a qualified State long-term care insurance partnership. They do not apply to the reporting of data by insurers for States with a Medicaid State plan amendment that established a long-term care partnership on or before May 14, 1993.
#### § 156.400 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Advance payments of the premium tax credit* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Affordable Care Act* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.20 of this subchapter.

*Annual limitation on cost sharing* means the annual dollar limit on cost sharing required to be paid by an enrollee that is established by a particular qualified health plan.

*De minimis variation* means the allowable variation in the AV of a health plan that does not result in a material difference in the true dollar value of the health plan as established in § 156.140(c).

*De minimis variation for a silver plan variation* means a −0 percentage point and +1 percentage point allowable AV variation.

*Federal poverty level* or *FPL* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.300(a) of this subchapter.

*Indian* has the meaning given to the term in § 155.300(a) of this subchapter.

*Limited cost sharing plan variation* means, with respect to a QHP at any level of coverage, the variation of such QHP described in § 156.420(b)(2).

*Maximum annual limitation on cost sharing* means the highest annual dollar amount that qualified health plans (other than QHPs with cost-sharing reductions) may require in cost sharing for a particular year, as established for that year under § 156.130.

*Most generous* or *more generous* means, as between a QHP (including a standard silver plan) or plan variation and one or more other plan variations of the same QHP, the standard plan or plan variation designed for the category of individuals last listed in § 155.305(g)(3) of this subchapter. *Least generous* or *less generous* has the opposite meaning.

*Plan variation* means a zero cost sharing plan variation, a limited cost sharing plan variation, or a silver plan variation.

*Reduced maximum annual limitation on cost sharing* means the dollar value of the maximum annual limitation on cost sharing for a silver plan variation that remains after applying the reduction, if any, in the maximum annual limitation on cost sharing required by section 1402 of the Affordable Care Act as announced in the annual HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters.

*Silver plan variation* means, with respect to a standard silver plan, any of the variations of that standard silver plan described in § 156.420(a).

*Stand-alone dental plan* means a plan offered through an Exchange under § 155.1065 of this subchapter.

*Standard plan* means a QHP offered at one of the four levels of coverage, defined at § 156.140, with an annual limitation on cost sharing that conforms to the requirements of § 156.130(a). A standard plan at the bronze, silver, gold, or platinum level of coverage is referred to as a standard bronze plan, a standard silver plan, a standard gold plan, and a standard platinum plan, respectively.

*Zero cost sharing plan variation* means, with respect to a QHP at any level of coverage, the variation of such QHP described in § 156.420(b)(1).

[78 FR 15535, Mar. 11, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 65097, Oct. 30, 2013; 87 FR 27392, May 6, 2022]
#### §§ 2490.112-2490.129 [Reserved]
#### § 213.29 Record for decision.

The transcript of testimony, exhibits, and all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, except the correspondence section of the docket, including rulings and any recommended or initial decision shall constitute the exclusive record for decision.
#### § 223.164 Penalty for falsification.

For false certification of documents relating to export or substitution and/or other violations of export and substitution requirements by the purchaser of timber from National Forest System lands, the Forest Service may cancel the subject contract, debar the involved person or persons from bidding on National Forest timber, or initiate other action as may be provided by law or regulation.

(Sec. 14, Pub. L. 94-588, 90 Stat. 2958, as amended (16 U.S.C. 472a); Sec. 301, Pub. L. 96-126, 93 Stat. 979; Sec. 1, 30 Stat. 35, as amended (16 U.S.C. 55.1); Sec. 301, 90 Stat. 1063, Pub. L. 94-373; Sec. 1, 30 Stat. 35, as amended (16 U.S.C. 551); (44 U.S.C. 3506))

[45 FR 80528, Dec. 5, 1980. Redesignated at 49 FR 2761, Jan. 23, 1984, and amended at 51 FR 40316, Nov. 6, 1986]
§ 1606.13 Interim and other funding, reprogramming, implementation. ( a ) Pending the completion of termination or limited reduction of funding proceedings under this part, the Corporation shall provide the recipient with the level of financial assistance provided for under its current grant or contract for financial assistance with the Corporation.
( b ) After a final decision has been made to terminate a recipient's grant or contract or to impose a limited reduction of funding, the recipient loses all rights to the terminated or reduced funds.
( c ) After a final decision has been made to terminate a recipient's grant or contract, the Corporation may authorize closeout or transition funding, or both, if necessary to enable the recipient to close or transfer current matters in a manner consistent with the recipient's professional responsibilities to its present clients.
( d ) The Corporation has sole discretion to determine the manner in which the final decision is implemented. The Corporation's discretion includes, but is not limited to the decision to pro-rate the amount of funds reduced over the remaining disbursements in the funding term or deduct the sum in a single disbursement, or any other method the Corporation deems appropriate.
( e ) Funds recovered by the Corporation pursuant to a termination or limited reduction of funding shall be reallocated by the Corporation for basic field purposes at its sole discretion.
§ 1330.23 Evaluation process. ( a ) The Director selects one or more of the selection criteria to evaluate an application: ( 1 ) The Director establishes selection criteria based on statutory provisions that apply to the Program which may include, but are not limited to: ( i ) Specific statutory selection criteria;
( ii ) Allowable activities;
( iii ) Application content requirements; or
( iv ) Other pre-award and post-award conditions; or
( 2 ) The Director may use a combination of selection criteria established under paragraph (a)(1) of this section and selection criteria from § 1330.24 to evaluate a competition.
( 3 ) For Field-Initiated Projects, the Director does not consider § 1330.24(b) (Responsiveness to the Absolute or Competitive Priority) in evaluating an application.
( b ) In considering selection criteria in § 1330.24, the Director selects one or more of the factors listed in the criteria, but always considers the factors in § 1330.24(n) regarding people with disabilities, and members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, ethnicity, national origin, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), or age.
( c ) The maximum possible score for an application is 100 points.
( d ) In the application package or a notice published in the Federal Register, the Director informs applicants of: ( 1 ) The selection criteria chosen and the maximum possible score for each of the selection criteria; and
( 2 ) The factors selected for considering the selection criteria and if points are assigned to each factor, the maximum possible score for each factor under each criterion. If no points are assigned to each factor, the Director evaluates each factor equally.
( e ) For all instances in which the Director chooses to allow field-initiated research and development, the selection criteria in § 1330.25 will apply, including the requirement that the applicant must achieve a score of 85 percent or more of maximum possible points.
[81 FR 29159, May 11, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 50003, Aug. 15, 2022]
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, David G. Hanna, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CompuCredit Corporation;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourthfiscal period in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a)               all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 3, 2004 |                                                 |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| * *                  | /s/ David G. Hanna                                   |
| * *                  | David G. Hanna                                       |
| * *                  | *Chief  Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board* |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 62416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee will meet on November 9, 2006, 9:30 a.m., Room 6087B, in the 
Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
implementation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and 
provides for continuing review to update the EAR as needed.

Agenda

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Presentation by the Office of Technology Evaluation.
    3. Policy Overview.
    4. Regulations Overview.
    5. Missile Technology Control Regime.
    6. Wassenaar Issues for Discussion at September 06 Multilateral 
Meeting--Call for 2007 Proposals.
    7. Presentation Papers and Comments by the Public.
    8. Reports on Working Groups.
    9. Follow-up on Open Action Items.
    10. Closing Comments.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Yvette 
Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0f9d3d0d2c9cec7c5d2e0c2c9d38ec4cfc38ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="28715b585a41464f4d5a684a415b064c474b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information contact Ms. Springer on (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: October 19, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-8888 Filed 10-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 212.5 Periodic review and redetermination; termination of temporary assistance. ( a ) The Administration or agency will review the situation of each recipient of temporary assistance at frequent intervals to consider whether or not circumstances have changed that would require a different plan for him.
( b ) Upon a finding by the Administration or agency that a recipient of temporary assistance has sufficient resources available to meet his needs, temporary assistance shall be terminated.
[39 FR 26548, July 19, 1974, as amended at 53 FR 36580, Sept. 21, 1988]
§ 156.915 Intervention. ( a ) The ALJ may grant the request of an entity, other than the respondent, to intervene if all of the following occur: ( 1 ) The entity has a significant interest relating to the subject matter of the case.
( 2 ) Disposition of the case will, as a practical matter, likely impair or impede the entity's ability to protect that interest.
( 3 ) The entity's interest is not adequately represented by the existing parties.
( 4 ) The intervention will not unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the existing parties.
( b ) A request for intervention must specify the grounds for intervention and the manner in which the entity seeks to participate in the proceedings. Any participation by an intervenor must be in the manner and by any deadline set by the ALJ.
( c ) The Department of Labor (DOL) or the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may intervene without regard to paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section.
§ 9.53 May I continue to operate while the NPS reviews my application? During this interim period, you may continue to conduct operations subject to the following conditions: ( a ) Continuation of operations is limited to those methods and the area of disturbance that existed on December 5, 2016 or the effective date of a boundary change, or establishment of a new System unit, as applicable.
( b ) Your operation is subject to the general terms and conditions in §§ 9.120 through 9.122 and the prohibitions and penalties in §§ 9.180 through 9.182.
( c ) Except in an emergency, we will not take any steps to directly regulate your operation before 90 days after December 5, 2016 or 90 days after the effective date of a boundary change, or establishment of a new System unit, as applicable.
#### § 1801.52 Payment schedule.

The Foundation will pay the Scholar a portion of the award of the Scholarship stipend (as described in the Foundation's Bulletin of Information) after each report submitted under § 1801.51.
----

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant      to**

**Section 906      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and operating results of the                Company.  |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                David C. Choi       |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| David                C. Choi           |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer |   |
| May                9, 2007             |   |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan G. Silverglat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information
         contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                       /s/ Alan G. Silverglat
                                       ----------------------
                                       Alan G. Silverglat
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 12, 2002
[No. 1784.]

#### Haley v. Breeze.

Replevin — Taxes—Res Judicata.

In an action of replevin for personal property where defendant claimed title under a sale for taxes, the plaintiff could not question the validity of the taxes or the sufficiency of the warrant where those questions had once been adjudicated and determined by the courts upon the identical taxes and warrants upon which the sale was made.

*Appeal from the District Oourt of Arapahoe County.*

Mr. W. T. Hughes, for appellant.

Mr. W. B. .McClelland and Mr. Henry T. Sale, for appellee.

Thomson, J.

Replevin by appellant against appellee to recover four head *438of horses alleged to have been wrongfully detained by the defendant. The answer claimed title in the defendant by virtue of a sale of the property to him for delinquent and unpaid taxes against the plaintiff upon a valid tax warrant. The replication denied the validity of the taxes and the warrant. The trial resulted in a judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

We do not deem it necessary to go into the evidence. It is enough to say that it conclusively appears that the taxes, whose validity is disputed, are the identical taxes which the supreme court in *Breeze v.*Haley, 10 Colo. 5, and again in *Breeze v. Haley,*11 Colo. 351, passed upon and sustained; and that the tax warrant is the same tax warrant which the supreme court in *Haley v. Elliott,*20 Colo. 379, adjudged sufficient. Every material question raised by the appellant has been settled and finally determined against him by the supreme court, and is no longer open to adjudication.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
#### § 1705.11 Penalties.

Title 18 U.S.C. 1001, Crimes and Criminal Procedures, makes it a criminal offense, subject to a maximum fine of $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years or both to knowingly and willfully make or cause to be made any false or fraudulent statements or representations in any matter within the jurisdiction of any agency of the United States. Section 552a(i)(3) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3)), makes it a misdemeanor, subject to a maximum fine of $5,000, to knowingly and willfully request or obtain any record concerning an individual under false pretenses. Section 552a(i) (1) and (2) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(1) and (2)) provide penalties for violations by agency employees of the Privacy Act or regulations established thereunder.
§ 1630.3 Time. ( a ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time under this part, the time period begins the day following the event and includes the last day of the period, unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal government. In those cases, the time period includes the next business day. When the prescribed time period is seven days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded from the computation.
( b ) *Extensions.* A recipient may, within the applicable timeframe for a particular response under this part, submit a written request for an extension of time for good cause to LSC. LSC will respond to the request for extension within seven calendar days from the date of receiving the request. LSC may grant the request for extension and shall notify the recipient of its decision in writing.