alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |                |                                                               |   |   |   |   |
|--------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |                |                                                               |   |   |   |   |
|   |  April 7, 2014 |                                                               |
|   |                |                                                               |
|   | By:                 | /s/ Kai-Shing Tao                                                  |   |   |   |   |
|   |                | Kai-Shing Tao                                                      |   |   |
|   |                | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |

----
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, Rodney J. Ruston, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas A. Wilkes , Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of North American Energy Partners Inc. (the Company), certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 19, 2007



/s/ Rodney J. RustonRodney J. Ruston President and Chief Executive
Officer




/s/ Douglas A. WilkesDouglas A. Wilkes Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to North American Energy Partners Inc. and will be retained by North American Energy Partners Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 217 (Thursday, November 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65773-65774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Recreation Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation 
Enhancement Act (Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice of new recreation fee site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Forests in North Carolina will begin charging a 
$3.00 special recreation permit trail fee per

[[Page 65774]]

day per mountain bike rider and $20.00 per mountain bike rider for a 
season pass for use of the Woodrun mountain bike trail system. This 
trail system consists of 24 miles of trails managed primarily for use 
by mountain bikers. The trail system is managed to protect 
environmental and cultural resource sites and will facilitate continued 
mountain bike use within the National Forests in North Carolina on the 
Uwharrie Ranger District. Fee revenue will support operations and 
maintenance of the trail system and trailhead and future site 
improvements.

DATES: The fee is scheduled for implementation in May of 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Wright, Recreation Fee 
Coordinator, 828-257-4256, National Forests in North Carolina, P.O. Box 
2750, Asheville, NC 28802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new recreation 
fee areas are established. This new fee will reviewed by a Recreation 
Resource Advisory Committee prior to a final decision and 
implementation. The National Forests in North Carolina presently 
manages one other mountain bike trail system fee site in North 
Carolina. Recreation fees are $3.00 per mountain bike per day and 
$20.00 per mountain bike per season pass at this site. The Woodrun 
mountain bike trail system will offer a vault toilet facility at the 
trailhead, trash receptacle, improved parking area, information kiosk, 
area specific map, and access to twenty-four miles of mountain bike 
trails.

    Dated: November 3, 2006.
Marisue Hilliard,
National Forests in North Carolina Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9161 Filed 11-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
Rockingham,

No. 5066.

#### Indian Head Millwork Corp. *v.*Glendale Homes, Inc.

Argued October 2, 1962.

Decided October 31, 1962.

*313
      *Hamblett, Kerrigan & Hamblett*and *Robert W. Pillsbury {Mr. Pillsbury*orally), for the plaintiff.

*John L. Southwick, Jr.*(by brief and orally), as attorney in fact for the defendant.

Blandin, J.

The single issue here is whether the Court, in imposing costs as a condition to striking off the default, abused its discretion. *Lavoie*v. *Bourque,*103 N. H. 372, 374.

Since the defendant had entered an appearance, it was necessary, in the circumstances before us, that it be notified of the hearing. *Lewellyn*v. *Follansbee,*94 N. H. 111, 113.

The plaintiff introduced testimony through the clerk of court that “in the ordinary course of business” a joint letter, dated May 11, 1961 properly addressed, was sent to the attorneys of both parties, notifying them of the hearing to be held on May 23, 1961. This was evidence that such a letter was received by the defendant’s clerk (1 Wigmore, Evidence, (3d *ed.) s.*95) as it indisputably was by the plaintiff’s counsel. On the defendant’s denial that it received notice, all of the evidentiary facts were to be weighed, and the question then became one for the Presiding Justice to resolve upon the evidence before it. *Magazine Repeating Razor Co.*v. *Weissbard,*125 N. J. Eq. 593; 9 Wigmore, *314Evidence (3d *ed.) ss.*2487 (d), *p.*281; 2519 (a); Thayer, Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, *pp.*346, 348-349.

Upon the entire record, the Court’s conclusion was sustainable and its imposition of costs was not an abuse of discretion.

*Exception overruled.*

Kenison, C. J., did not sit; the others concurred.
| Active Subsidiaries                                                                                          | Inactive Subsidiaries                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                         |                                                |
| Hainan Shiner Industrial Co., Ltd.                                                                           | Hainan Shiny-day Color Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. |
|                                                                                                         |                                                |
| Zhuhai Huanuo Packaging Material Co., Ltd.                                                                   | Hainan Modern Hi-Tech Industrial Co., Ltd.          |
|                                                                                                         |                                                |
| Shanghai Juneng Functional Film Company, Ltd.,a joint venture in which Shiner holds a 70% ownership interest |                                                |
|                                                                                                         |                                                |

| * | Except as otherwise set forth herein, all subsidiaries are organized and existing under the laws of the People's Republic of China and 100% owned by Shiner |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
This table was generated on 9/7/23.

Rank ID # Committee Amount

1 C00344234 PAC TO THE FUTURE $829,500

2 C00467431 THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $575,000

3 C00574970 FAIR SHOT PAC $572,908

4 C00428052 MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC $565,000

5 C00271338 AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $407,500

6 C00617803 JOBS, EDUCATION, & FAMILIES FIRST JEFF PAC $402,500

7 C00563726 MR. SOUTHERN MISSOURIAN IN THE HOUSE PAC $325,000

8 C00469429 CMR POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $303,500

9 C00570945 E-PAC $289,500

10 C00540187 INNOVATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $255,000

11 C00235655 BLUEGRASS COMMITTEE $215,000

12 C00573709 CA LUV PAC (CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP UNITED FOR VICTORY PAC) $212,202

13 C00592089 ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS (EMMER PAC) $210,000

14 C00442368 COMMON VALUES PAC $195,000

15 C00493700 BLUE HEN FEDERAL PAC $195,000

16 C00375584 GREAT LAKES PAC $190,000

17 C00672733 BULLDOG PAC $186,000

18 C00497131 PURPOSE PAC $183,500

19 C00365270 M-PAC $176,500

20 C00749481 RAPTOR PAC $173,000

21 C00412791 FORWARD TOGETHER PAC $165,000

22 C00431874 FOLLOW THE NORTH STAR FUND $160,000

23 C00542027 BIG SKY OPPORTUNITY PAC $160,000

24 C00331694 AMERICA WORKS FEDERAL PAC $157,500

25 C00495887 TOMORROW IS MEANINGFUL PAC $155,000

26 C00692111 VELVET HAMMER PAC $155,000

27 C00391797 DIRIGO PAC $152,500

28 C00566851 JOBS OPPORTUNITY AND NEW IDEAS PAC $150,000

29 C00540146 FIRST IN FREEDOM PAC $147,000

30 C00571323 TOGETHER HOLDING OUR MAJORITY PAC $145,000

31 C00785816 LIFTOFF PAC $144,000

32 C00200865 ROAD TO FREEDOM CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $138,000

33 C00390161 EUREKA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $136,500

34 C00410308 SHORE PAC $135,500

35 C00629212 ALL FOR OUR COUNTRY LEADERSHIP PAC $135,000

36 C00347195 PRAIRIE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $135,000

37 C00480228 CONTINUING AMERICA'S STRENGTH AND SECURITY PAC $132,800

38 C00492983 NUTMEG PAC $132,000

39 C00623512 IN THE ARENA PAC $127,500

40 C00817338 MVL PAC $125,700

41 C00538835 COMMON GROUND PAC $125,000

42 C00390674 FREEDOM FUND $125,000

43 C00507574 MOTOR CITY PAC $122,500

44 C00525212 VICTORY AND FREEDOM PAC (VAF PAC) $121,000

45 C00433680 TREASURE STATE PAC $120,000

46 C00748186 COMMONSENSE, CONSERVATIVE VALUES PAC $120,000

47 C00409276 MAKING A RESPONSIBLE STAND FOR HOUSEHOLDS IN AMERICA PAC $115,000

48 C00654475 SMART SOLUTIONS PAC $115,000

49 C00458570 A NEW DIRECTION PAC $112,000

50 C00576090 EVERGREEN PAC $112,000

Top 50 Leadership PACs by Contributions to Candidates and Other Committees

January 1 - June 30, 2023

PAC Table 14c
§ 1174.43 Voluntary settlement of the administrative complaint. ( a ) Parties may make offers of compromise or settlement at any time. Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.
( b ) The reviewing official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle the case from the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to issue a complaint until the ALJ issues an initial decision.
( c ) The authority head has exclusive authority to compromise or settle the case from the date of the ALJ's initial decision until initiation of any judicial review or any action to collect the penalties and assessments.
( d ) The Attorney General has exclusive authority to compromise or settle the case while any judicial review or any action to recover penalties and assessments is pending.
( e ) The investigating official may recommend settlement terms to the reviewing official, the authority head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate.
Record of Communication

Subject : NI ST Cost Containment Procedures for Cy linder Analy sis On October 30, 2009, Frank Guenther of the National I nstitute of Standards and Technology (NI ST) responded to an inquiry from John Schakenbach of the Environmental P rotection Agency (EPA) regarding NIST procedures to keep cy linder anal ys is cost as low as possible.

The NIST cost containment strategy is: 1) Receipt of a batch of cy linders all within the same predefined concentration range allows us to setup instrument ation and form a calibration curves more efficientl y. This has been arraigned in the past through the contractor and works very well. Also. scheduling batches of cy linders to arrive when NIST is ready for them will allow NIST to more efficientl y schedule their resources. 2) The cross interactions of the anal yt ical species on the instrumentation we use has been modeled well alread y. Future work can make use of that modeling, where we only need to confirm the correction factors are still good before using them. 3) NI ST has agreed to analyze these cy linders to 0.5 % uncertainty (1 % expanded uncertaint y). The reason for this uncertainty goal is to allow reasonable certainty when judging a audit cy linder with 2 % expanded uncertainty . No reasonable cost ga ins will be achieved by increasing our uncertainty to 1 % (2% expanded). 4) Since our uncertaint y requirements are relatively high (1 % expanded), we can use intermediate standards for all of this work. This keeps the cost down, because our high value pr imary standards do not have to be used. In addition NI ST has invested in tri

- mix working standards that will allow us to validate our methods much quicker. 5) In the future we will be working on a FTIR method that may allow us to further reduce costs by c onsolidating all analy

tical work to an automated instrument. 6) High concentration audit cy linders will alway s cost less to analy ze. The lowest concentration audit cy linders will cost NI ST approximately 25 % more to anal yz e.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3364

___________________________

Samuel N. Edeh

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Equifax Information Services, LLC

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: May 7, 2014

Filed: May 9, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Edeh appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment

1

on his Fair Credit Reporting Act claims, its ruling on a discovery matter, and its

The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota. 
denial of reconsideration. Following careful review, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court in each of the challenged orders. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
August 13, 2015

Dear Bulanov:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-1824). This informati on is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 8/27/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
#### State *v.*Royce A. Smith.

January Term, 1900.

Present: Taft, C. J., Bo well, Munson, Thompson, Start and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed March 3, 1900.

*Keeping a dog without a license*— Vicious *dog*— To a prosecution for keeping a dog without a license, it is no defense that the dog is vicious and cannot be licensed. It being unlawful to keep a dog without a license, and also unlawful to procure a license for a vicious dog, it follows that a vicious dog cannot be kept at all.

F. *S. 4826*is not unconstitutional.

Complaint under Y. S. 4826, charging the respondent with keeping three dogs, more than eight weeks old, not registered, numbered, described and licensed according to law.

Franklin County, January Term, 1900, *Tyler*J., presiding. Yerdict, guilty. Judgment on verdict. The respondent excepted.

*D. W.*Steele, State’s Attorney, and *Emmett McFeeters*for the State.

*F. W. McGettriek*for the respondent.

Nowell, J.

The respondent is prosecuted for keeping three dogs without a license. He proved that the dogs were vicious, and claimed that that was a defense; but the court held otherwise, and he was convicted.

The statute provides that the owner or keeper of a dog more than eight weeks old, shall annually, on or before the first day of April, cause it to be registered, numbered, described, and licensed in the office of the clerk of the town wherein the dog is kept, and shall cause ic to wear a collar, distinctly marked with the owner’s name and its registered number; that if the owner or keeper of a dog that is vicious or has done damage, procures a license therefor, he shall be fined twenty dollars, and that the town clerk shall not license a dog known to be vicious or to have *141done damage; that a person who keeps a dog contrary to the provisions thereof, shall be fined fifteen dollars. It further provides that the chairman of the selectmen shall annually, within such a time, issue a warrant to one or more police officers or constables, directing them to proceed forthwith to kill or cause to be killed all dogs within their respective towns not licensed and collared according to its provisions, and to enter a complaint against the owners or keepers thereof; and that any person may, and every police officer and constable shall, kill or cause to be killed such dogs whenever and wherever found.

It being unlawful to keep a dog without a license, and also unlawful to procure a license for a vicious dog, it follows that a vicious dog cannot be kept at all; and this is the manifest purpose and policy of the statute. It was, therefore, no answer for the respondent to say that his dogs were vicious and could not be licensed, for he was, nevertheless, keeping them without a license, which he had no right to do, as the prohibition of the statute is general.

It is claimed, however, that the statute is unconstitutional. But that question has been so often ruled the other way that it is hardly worth while to discuss it. *Sentell*v. *New Orleans, etc. R. R. Co.,*166 U. S. 698.

*Judgment that there is no error, • and that the respondent take nothing hy his exceptions. Let sentence he imposed and execution thereof done.*
```

[Senate Hearing 109-347]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                [ERRATA]

                                                        S. Hrg. 109-347

 
  SPREAD OF INVASIVE SPECIES; CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO COFFMAN COVE, AK; 
AMEND PUBLIC LAW 97-435; LAND EXCHANGE IN LINCOLN NATIONAL FOREST; AND 
                 CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN CLARK COUNTY, NV

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

                SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS AND FORESTS

                                 of the

                              COMMITTEE ON
                      ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                       ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                                   on
                                     

                           S. 405                                S. 1522

                           S. 1541                               S. 1548

                           H.R. 482

                                     

                               __________

                            NOVEMBER 2, 2005

                       Printed for the use of the
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                                 ______

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
29-777                      WASHINGTON : 2006
_____________________________________________________________________________
For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov  Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512�091800  
Fax: (202) 512�092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402�090001

      

                                [ERRATA]

                            S. Hrg. 109-347

    An error was made on the cover of S. Hrg. 109-347. The bill 
number should be ``S. 1552'' not ``S. 1522''.

```
Exhibit 31.1
Certification Pursuant To
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Chief Executive Officer)
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  September 23, 2008
    /s/ J.S.B. JenkinsJ.S.B. JenkinsChief Executive Officer