alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Software Assurance will meet in closed session on February 23 and 24, 2006; at Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This meeting is to chart the direction of the study and begin assessing the current capabilities and vulnerabilities of DoD software.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess the risk that DoD runs as a result of foreign influence on its software and to suggest technology and other measures to mitigate the risk.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e-mail at                         *clifton.phillips@osd.mil,*                         or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

Dated: January 27, 2006.

Linda Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 06-959 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 17.3 Precautions to be taken.

The issuing organization shall take reasonable precautions to assure that information released is accurate and that its release fulfills an authorized purpose.
#### § 1622.10 Report to Congress.

The Corporation shall report to the Congress annually regarding its compliance with the requirements of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b), including a tabulation of the number of meetings open to the public, the number of meetings or portions of meetings closed to the public, the reasons for closing such meetings or portions thereof, and a description of any litigation brought against the Corporation under 5 U.S.C. 552b, including any costs assessed against the Corporation in such litigation.
§ 2506.9 What rights do I have as a debtor? As a debtor you have several basic rights. You have a right to: ( a ) Notice as set forth in these regulations (see § 2506.14);
( b ) Inspect the records that the Corporation has used to determine that you owe a debt (see § 2506.14);
( c ) Request review of the debt and possible payment options (see § 2506.17);
( d ) Propose a voluntary repayment agreement (see § 2506.19); and/or
( e ) Question if the debt is excluded from these regulations (see § 2506.5(b)).
§ 1636.2 Requirements. ( a ) When a recipient files a complaint in a court of law or otherwise initiates or participates in litigation against a defendant, or before a recipient engages in pre-complaint settlement negotiations with a prospective defendant on behalf of a client who has authorized it to file suit in the event that the settlement negotiations are unsuccessful, it shall: ( 1 ) Identify each plaintiff it represents by name in any complaint it files, or in a separate notice provided to the defendant against whom the complaint is filed where disclosure in the complaint would be contrary to law or court rules or practice, and identify each plaintiff it represents to prospective defendants in pre-litigation settlement negotiations, unless a court of competent jurisdiction has entered an order protecting the client from such disclosure based on a finding, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing on the matter, of probable, serious harm to the plaintiff if the disclosure is not prevented; and
( 2 ) Prepare a dated written statement signed by each plaintiff it represents, enumerating the particular facts supporting the complaint, insofar as they are known to the plaintiff when the statement is signed.
( b ) The statement of facts must be written in English and, if necessary, in a language other than English that the plaintiff understands.
( c ) In the event of an emergency, where the recipient reasonably believes that delay is likely to cause harm to a significant safety, property or liberty interest of the client, the recipient may proceed with the litigation or negotiation without a signed statement of facts, provided that the statement is prepared and signed as soon as possible thereafter.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Atlas Energy Resources, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD E. COHEN                 
|Edward E. Cohen                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|February 26, 2010
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3 2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, May 10, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex RES REPORTED 

No No SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

-
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 43 246 Lincoln P. Bloomfield, Jr., ofVirginia, to be an Apr 26, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Assistant Secretary of State (Political-Military Helms, Committee on Foreign 

Affairs), vice Eric D. Newsom. Relations, without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 47 245 Victoria Clarke, of Maryland, to be an Assistant May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of Defense, vice Kenneth H. Bacon. Warner, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed report. 

* 49 263 William J. Haynes II, of Tennessee, to be General May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Counsel of the Department of Defense, vice Warner, Committee on Armed 

Douglas A. Dworkin. Services, without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 58 167 David Aufhauser, of the District of Columbia, to May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

be General Counsel for the Department of the Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Treasury, vice Neal S. Wolin, resigned. without printed report. 

* 59 179 Kenneth W. Dam, of Illinois, to be Deputy May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Stuart E. Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Eizenstat, resigned. without printed report. 

* 60 198 Michele A. Davis, of Virginia, to be an Assistant May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Michelle Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Andrews Smith, resigned. without printed report. 

* 61 238 John B. Taylor, of California, to be an Under May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Timothy F. Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Geithner. without printed report. 

* S~gmfies nominee's commLtment to respond to requests to appear and testL{y before any duly constLtuted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
Exhibit 32.1




















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Nilam Resources Inc. (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer, acting President, acting Treasurer, and the acting principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nilam Resources Inc.





Date: March 26, 2012 /s/ Shahin TabatabaeiShahin Tabatabaei, Director, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer, and Acting Principal Accounting Officer
#### Kendrick Taylor, Respondent, *v.*John W. Barnett, as Executor of Betsey A. Barnard, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

*Taylor*v. *Barnett,*117 App. Div. 917, affirmed.

(Argued January 11, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 24, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for services alleged to have been rendered a decedent.

*E. W.*Cregg, *F. J. Cregg*and *E. N. Wells*for appellants.

*Lorenzo D. Tyler*for respondent.

*552Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there is some evidence of non-payment, the question of the burden of proof as to payment not being passed upon; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.
§ 2105.57 Who makes decisions on appeals? ( a ) The FOIA Appeals Officer is the deciding official for FOIA appeals.
( b ) When necessary, the appropriate deciding official for FOIA appeals will consult other appropriate offices, including legal counsel, for denials of records and fee waivers.
( c ) The deciding official for FOIA appeals normally will not make a decision on an appeal if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
Hillsborough,

No. 5374.

#### Alphonse Salito *v.*Anne Salito.

Argued December 7, 1965.

Decided February 28, 1966.

*55*Hamblett, Kerrigan & Hamblett*and *Robert W. Pillsbury (Mr. Pills bury*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Harkaway & Barry (Mr. Aaron A. Harkaway*orally), for the defendant.

Kenison, C. J.

Although the evidence is conflicting, there is

support in the record for the finding of the Court that the husband was not entitled to a divorce. The husband can prevail only if his contention is correct that the issue of abandonment by the wife is res judicata because of the order of the Court in 1962 in the proceedings under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act. RSA ch. 546 (supp). Under that act it is not necessary that the husband flee the jurisdiction, abscond or attempt to conceal his whereabouts. *Bourdon*v. *Bourdon,*105 N. H. 432. The determination of the husband’s ability to support his wife or his obligation to support her does not necessarily or automatically determine that the separation of the parties is not consensual, or that either party has cause for divorce, nor does it supplant the statutory grounds for divorce. See *State*v. *Greenberg,*16 N. J. 568; *Stubbefield*v. *Stubbefield*(Tex. Civ. App.) 272 S.W. 2d 633.

The civil remedies provided in the Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act “are in addition to and not in substitution for any other remedies.” RSA 546:3 (supp); *Bourdon*v. *Bourdon, supra;*Annot. 42 A.L.R. 2d 768; Kelso, Reciprocal Enforcement: 1958 Dimensions, 43 Minn. L. Rev. 875 (1959). It was not intended that this act would import into the law of support across state lines the unsatisfactory doctrine of election of remedies. It is true that friction and discord between the husband and wife was of long duration and apparently neither desired a reconciliation. It is true that the wife “in effect refused to accompany her husband” from New York to New Hampshire. But these truths do not solve the problem of who was at fault, or whether the separation was justified or whether the wife’s refusal to accompany her husband was justified. *Merritt*v. *Merritt,*85 N. H. 210. We conclude that the dismissal of the divorce petition in 1965 was proper and that the issue of abandonment by the wife was not res judicata by virtue of the 1962 proceeding under the Uniform Act.

*Plaintiffs exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM  THE QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT  TO SECTION
               13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF 1934 FOR
               THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            10,845
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      9,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  23,139
<PP&E>                                             6,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   142,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             10,565
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             142
<OTHER-SE>                                       132,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     142,767
<SALES>                                            8,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  12,401
<CGS>                                              4,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      4,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  30,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (22,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (22,706)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (22,706)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.62)



</TABLE>
§ 2544.100 What is the purpose of this part? This part establishes rules to ensure that the solicitation, acceptance, holding, administration, and use of property and services donated to the Corporation: ( a ) Will not reflect unfavorably upon the ability of the Corporation or its officers and employees, to carry out their official duties and responsibilities in a fair and objective manner; and
( b ) Will not compromise the integrity of the Corporation's programs or its officers and employees involved in such programs.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
La Cortez Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nadine C. Smith, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|/s/ Nadine C. Smith |                                
|------------------- | -------------------------------
|Name:               | Nadine C. Smith                
|Title:              | Interim Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               | April 16, 2012
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 6 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving 

the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. SCOTT

of Florida, Mr. VANCE, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

LEE, and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council 

in approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress disapproves of the action of the District 

4 of Columbia Council described as follows: The Local Resi5 dent Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 

6 24–640), enacted by the District of Columbia Council on 

7 November 21, 2022, and transmitted to Congress pursuVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:15 Feb 01, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ6.IS SJ6

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 6 IS 

1 ant to section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home 

2 Rule Act on January 10, 2023. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 94 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 94

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the proposed rule submitted by the Office of 
Refugee Resettlement of the Administration for Children and Families of 
      the Department of Health and Human Services relating to the 
           Unaccompanied Children Program Foundational Rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
 Cornyn, Mr. Risch, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Johnson, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Braun, 
Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Daines, Mr. Budd, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. 
 Cramer, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Vance, Mr. Young, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
Crapo, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Hoeven, Ms. 
Ernst, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Lee, Mrs. Britt, Mr. 
Schmitt, Mr. Rubio, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Moran, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Cruz, 
 Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
  Thune, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Scott of South Carolina) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the proposed rule submitted by the Office of 
Refugee Resettlement of the Administration for Children and Families of 
      the Department of Health and Human Services relating to the 
           Unaccompanied Children Program Foundational Rule.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by the Office of Refugee Resettlement of the 
Administration for Children and Families of the Department of Health 
and Human Services relating to ``Unaccompanied Children Program 
Foundational Rule'' (89 Fed. Reg. 34384 (April 30, 2024)), seeking to 
replace regulations relating to the key aspects of the placement, care, 
and services provided to unaccompanied alien children, and such 
proposed rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit (15) Letter Re: Unaudited
Financial Information

Board of Directors and Shareholder

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.


We are aware of the incorporation by reference in
the following Registration Statements (Form S-4 Nos. 333-43005
and 333-83117) of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., for the
registration of its 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 of
our report dated May 11, 2004 relating to the unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of Park-Ohio
Industries, Inc., which are included in its Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004.



| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

May 12, 2004


21