alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1303

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1303 appear at 89 FR 67816, Aug. 21, 2024.

#### § 1303.41 Approval of previously purchased facilities.

If a grant recipient purchased a facility after December 31, 1986, and seeks to use grant funds to continue to pay purchase costs for the facility or to refinance current indebtedness and use grant funds to service the resulting debt, the grant recipient may apply for funds to meet those costs. The grant recipient must submit an application that conforms to requirements in this part and in the Act to the responsible HHS official. If the responsible HHS official approves the grant recipient's application, Head Start funds may be used to pay ongoing purchase costs, which include principal and interest on approved loans.
#### Michael Pulcino, as Administrator of the Estate of Pasquale Pulcino, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Pulcino*v. *Long Island It. It. Co.,*125 App. Div. 629, affirmed.

(Argued December 16, 1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 30, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new *527trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence.

*William C. Beecher*and *Joseph F. Keany*for appellant.

*Thomas J. O'Neill*and *Joseph A. Corr*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
§ 1628.4 Procedures. ( a ) A recipient may request a waiver of the 10% ceiling on LSC fund balances within 30 days after the submission to LSC of its annual audited financial statements. The request shall specify: ( 1 ) The LSC fund balance as reported in the recipient's annual audited financial statements;
( 2 ) The reason(s) for the excess fund balance;
( 3 ) The recipient's plan for disposing of the excess fund balance during the current fiscal year;
( 4 ) The amount of fund balance projected to be carried forward at the close of the recipient's current fiscal year; and
( 5 ) The special circumstances justifying the retention of the excess fund balance up to 25%, or the extraordinary and compelling circumstances set out in § 1628.3(c) justifying a fund balance in excess of 25%.
( b ) Within 45 days of receipt of the recipient's waiver request submitted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the Corporation shall provide a written response to the request and a written notice to the recipient of any fund balance due and payable to the Corporation as well as the method for repayment.
( c ) In the event that repayment is required, the Corporation shall give written notice 30 days prior to the effective date for repayment. Repayment shall be in a lump sum or by pro rata deductions from the recipient's grant checks for a specific number of months. The Corporation shall determine which of the specified methods of repayment is reasonable and appropriate in each case after consultation with the recipient.
( d ) A recipient may submit a waiver request to retain a fund balance in excess of 25% of its LSC support prior to the submission of its audited financial statements. The Corporation may, at its discretion, provide approval in writing. The request shall specify the extraordinary and compelling circumstances justifying the fund balance in excess of 25%; the estimated fund balance that the recipient anticipates it will accrue by the time of the submission of its audited financial statements; and the recipient's plan for disposing of the excess fund balance. Upon the submission of its annual audited financial statements, the recipient must submit updated information consistent with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section to confirm the actual fund balance to be retained.
( e ) The Corporation's written approval of a request for a waiver shall require that the recipient use the funds it is permitted to retain within the time period set out in the approval and for the purposes approved by the Corporation.
( f ) Excess fund balances approved by the Corporation for expenditure by a recipient shall be separately reported by natural line item in the current fiscal year's audited financial statements. This may be done by establishing a separate fund or by providing a separate supplemental schedule as part of the audit report.
( g ) The recipient shall promptly inform and seek guidance from the Corporation when it determines a need for any changes to the conditions on timing or purposes set out in the Corporation's written approval of a recipient's request for a waiver.
[65 FR 66642, Nov. 7, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 43968, July 24, 2015]
§ 156.917 Issues to be heard and decided by ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ has the authority to hear and decide the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether a basis exists to assess a civil money penalty against the respondent.
( 2 ) Whether the amount of the assessed civil money penalty is reasonable.
( 3 ) Whether a basis exists to decertify a QHP offered by the respondent in a Federally-facilitated Exchange.
( b ) In deciding whether the amount of a civil money penalty is reasonable, the ALJ— ( 1 ) Will apply the factors that are identified in § 156.805 for civil money penalties.
( 2 ) May consider evidence of record relating to any factor that HHS did not apply in making its initial determination, so long as that factor is identified in this subpart.
( c ) If the ALJ finds that a basis exists to assess a civil money penalty, the ALJ may sustain, reduce, or increase the penalty that HHS assessed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hollaway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David Hollaway     
|David Hollaway         
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 8, 2008
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3860

_____________________________

DARRIN LEE CARMICHAEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

June 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Matthew R. McLain of McLain Law, P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

September Term, 2019

In re: Court Operations in Light

of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Filed On: March 17, 2020

O R D E R

Upon consideration of current circumstances relating to the COVID-19

(coronavirus) pandemic, the state of emergency declared by the Mayor of the District of

Columbia on March 11, 2020, the national emergency declared by the President of the

United States on March 13, 2020, and guidance from the Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention recommending limiting personal contact and public gatherings to reduce

the possibility of exposure to the virus and to slow community spread, it is, on the

court’s own motion, 

ORDERED that all in-person onsite oral arguments be suspended pending

further order of the court. Each panel scheduled to hear argument on a particular day

will determine for each scheduled case whether:

(1) Argument in the scheduled case or cases will proceed by teleconference; 

(2) Argument in the scheduled case or cases will be postponed until a later date;

(3) The scheduled case or cases will be decided without oral argument.

The Clerk’s Office will contact counsel directly in cases where the panel determines that

argument by teleconference is advisable. The Clerk’s Office will provide notice by

order, or telephone as necessary, in cases where the panel postpones oral argument or

determines that the case can be decided without oral argument.

These policies are intended to help reduce the health risks to the public, Court

staff, and arguing counsel. Counsel and the public are advised that in keeping with the

public health precautions recommended in response to COVID-19, and in light of

developing circumstances, the court will continue to monitor and examine options for

cases currently scheduled for oral argument.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

 BY:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

USCA Case #19-5161 Document #1834112 Filed: 03/18/2020 Page 1 of 1
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06195

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06195\06195_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06195\06195_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06195\06195_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06195\06195_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06195\06195_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06195\06195_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06195\06195_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06195\06195_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06195\06195_telecon1.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 06195\06195_telecon2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 06195\06195_telecon3.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

06195\Certification Statement Plant ID 06195.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06195\Supplemental Documents\06195_MAP-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06195\Supplemental Documents\06195_WP.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 2506.7 Why does the Corporation have to collect debts?

Federal agencies are required to try to collect claims or debts of the Federal Government for money, funds, or property arising out of the agency's activities.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

p0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146253

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146253

COA: 306265

Wayne CC: 11-000473-FC

ROBERT JAMAR HALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 150.211 Notice to the State. If CMS is satisfied that there is a reasonable question whether there has been a failure to substantially enforce PHS Act requirements, CMS sends, in writing, the notice described in § 150.213 of this part, to the following State officials: ( a ) The governor or chief executive officer of the State.
( b ) The insurance commissioner or chief insurance regulatory official.
( c ) If the alleged failure involves HMOs, the official responsible for regulating HMOs if different from the official listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
#### § 160.101 Statutory basis and purpose.

The requirements of this subchapter implement sections 1171-1180 of the Social Security Act (the Act), sections 262 and 264 of Public Law 104-191, section 105 of Public Law 110-233, sections 13400-13424 of Public Law 111-5, and section 1104 of Public Law 111-148.

[78 FR 5687, Jan. 25, 2013]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 302 CERTIFICATION I, Alan G. Silverglat, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Pulitzer Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting. Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ Alan G. Silverglat
Alan G. Silverglat
Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 608 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential addition to the national wild 

and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 608 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deerfield River Wild 

3 and Scenic River Study Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY; REPORT. 

5 Section 5 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1276) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(147) DEERFIELD RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS

10 AND VERMONT.—The entire river, including— 

11 ‘‘(A) the North, South, East, and West 

12 Branches of the Deerfield River; and 

13 ‘‘(B) the major tributaries of the Deerfield 

14 River, including the Green River, North River, 

15 South River, Clesson Brook, Chickley River, 

16 Cold River, Gulf Brook, Bog Brook, and Dun17 bar Brook.’’; and 

18 (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

19 following: 

20 ‘‘(24) DEERFIELD RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS AND

21 VERMONT.—Not later than 3 years after the date on 

22 which funds are made available to carry out this 

23 paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall— 

24 ‘‘(A) complete the study described in sub25 section (a)(147); and 
3 

†S 608 ES

1 ‘‘(B) submit to the appropriate committees 

2 of Congress a report describing the results of 

3 such study.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 608 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct 

for other purposes. the national wild and scenic rivers system, and of the Deerfield River for potential addition to the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Graham R. Hughes, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-QSB of Regma Bio Technologies Limited;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this interim report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.  	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this interim report.

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.





| | /s/ Graham R. Hughes 
Graham R. Hughes 
Secretary/Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 150.203 Circumstances requiring CMS enforcement. CMS enforces PHS Act requirement to the extent warranted (as determined by CMS) in any of the following circumstances: ( a ) *Notification by State.* A State notifies CMS that it has not enacted legislation to enforce or that it is not otherwise enforcing PHS Act requirements.
( b ) *Determination by CMS.* If CMS receives or obtains information that a State may not be substantially enforcing PHS Act requirements, it may initiate the process described in this subchapter to determine whether the State is failing to substantially enforce these requirements.
( c ) *Special rule for guaranteed availability in the individual market.* If a State has notified CMS that it is implementing an acceptable alternative mechanism in accordance with § 148.128 of this subchapter instead of complying with the guaranteed availability requirements of § 148.120, CMS's determination focuses on the following: ( 1 ) Whether the State's mechanism meets the requirements for an acceptable alternative mechanism.
( 2 ) Whether the State is implementing the acceptable alternative mechanism.
( d ) *Consequence of a State not implementing an alternative mechanism.* If a State is not implementing an acceptable alternative mechanism, CMS determines whether the State is substantially enforcing the requirements of §§ 148.101 through 148.126 and § 148.170 of this subchapter.
[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 83 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms, and Explosives relating to ‘‘Definition of ‘Engaged in the 

Business’ as a Dealer in Firearms’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2024 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

BUDD, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. DAINES, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. RISCH, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. LEE, Mr. COTTON, Mr. HAWLEY, Ms. ERNST, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. SCOTT of 

South Carolina, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. VANCE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

SCHMITT, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to ‘‘Definition of ‘Engaged in the Business’ 

as a Dealer in Firearms’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 83 IS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu2 reau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relat3 ing to ‘‘Definition of ‘Engaged in the Business’ as a Deal4 er in Firearms’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 28968 (April 19, 2024)), 

5 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS