alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T P' fo>~~~,, , 

C hJ F A i-E- ., 

May 25, 2015 

Mrs. Amanda W. Hite 

President and COO, STR, Inc. 

Chairman of the Board, STR Global STR, Inc, 

735 Main St. 

Hendersonville, TN 37-75 

Subject: Preserve Open Skies 

Dear U.S. Policy Malcers, 

As the leading authority on global hotel industiy perforinance trends, STR has been a steadfast partner 

and active supporter of the U.S. totu•ism industty for thirty years. STR's foundational mission is to 

positively contribute to the health and wealth of the American hotel, tourism and destination 

communities. 

It is through this lens that we support the Open Slcies Agreements that promote competition, increased 

capacity and choices for consumers. I am writing to urge you to preserve open slcies. Cities across the 

United States have benefited tremendously fi•om open access to international markets that have allowed 

millions of international visitors to travel to the United States. 

STR understands the vital role the airline industry plays in the American economy. For example, in 2013, 

140,600 international visitors brought to the U.S. by Emirates, Etihad and Qatar, resulted in $2.3 billion 

in economic output and support of 16,000 American jobs. The Gulf caiTiers are a pipeline to the Middle 

East, hidia, Southeast Asia, and beyond. This is vital to help the United States to meet the President's 

goal of 100 million international visitors by 2021, as part of the Administration's National Travel and 

Tourism Strategy. 

Thanlc you in advance for yom• time and attention to this matter and for recognizing the vast iinplications 

these policies have on the health of the U.S. totrism industty and the U.S. economy as a whole. 

Sincerely, 

~ 

A— !~ i 

Amanda W. Hite 

President and COO, STR 

Chairman of the Board, STR Global 

735 East Main Street Hendersonville, TN 37075 +1 615 824 8664 www.str.com
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                  ------------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Report of Aqua Vie Beverage  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended April 30, 2003,  as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Periodic
Report"), I, Thomas Gillespie>, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: June 27, 2003
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2006

109th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–131 

NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE 

AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA, IN ACCORDANCE 

WITH SECTION 2105(a)(1)(A) OF THE TRADE ACT OF 2002 (PUB. 

L. 107–210), PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2112(e)(1) 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2006.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with HOUSEE:\Seals\Congress.#13

pwalker on PRODPC60 with HOUSE
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 24, 2006. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the 

Trade Act of 2002, (Public Law 107–210) (the ‘‘Trade Act’’), I am 

pleased to notify the Congress of my intention to enter into a free 

trade agreement with the Republic of Colombia. 

The United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement will 

generate export opportunities for U.S. farmers, ranchers, and companies, help create jobs in the United States, and help American 

consumers save money while offering them more choices. The 

Agreement will also benefit the people of Colombia by providing 

economic opportunity and by strengthening democracy. 

Consistent with the Trade Act, I am sending this notification at 

least 90 days in advance of signing the Agreement. My Administration looks forward to working with the Congress in developing appropriate legislation to approve and implement this Agreement. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with HOUSE
BG

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0013

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KELLY BEVERLY BALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including July 26, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 24 2022

06/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AQUA VIE
BEVERAGE CORPORATION STATEMENTS AS OF 4/30/00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,757
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    189,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,903
<PP&E>                                         134,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 446,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,421,133
<BONDS>                                        420,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                        27,219
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,422,279)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   446,082
<SALES>                                         34,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               403,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (663,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (663,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (663,077)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
§ 160.550 Stay of the Secretary's decision. ( a ) Pending judicial review, the respondent may file a request for stay of the effective date of any penalty with the ALJ. The request must be accompanied by a copy of the notice of appeal filed with the Federal court. The filing of the request automatically stays the effective date of the penalty until such time as the ALJ rules upon the request.
( b ) The ALJ may not grant a respondent's request for stay of any penalty unless the respondent posts a bond or provides other adequate security.
( c ) The ALJ must rule upon a respondent's request for stay within 10 days of receipt.
Exhibit 34.3

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Technology & Service (USA) Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (Exhibit 33.3) that HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by auto loan receivables, as described in Schedule I of Exhibit 33.3 (the Applicable Servicing Criteria ), as of and for the period from June 8, 2006 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) through December 31, 2006.  Exhibit 33.3 identifies the individual asset-backed securitization transactions (the Covered Transactions)defined by management as part of their assessment. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Covered Transactions, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Covered Transactions, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period June 8, 2006 through December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 2007
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Charles Deisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.





Date:  May 14, 2010.





/s/ Charles DeisbeckCharles Deisbeck, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                                   RESOLUTIONS

     RESOLVED, that 50,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company, no par
value, be issued to Daniels & Daniels for legal services rendered, and be it

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that all of the above referenced shares of the
Company's common stock be registered in a registration statement on Form S-8
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and be it

     FUTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation be and hereby are,
authorized and directed to take all actions, and execute all instruments and
other documents in the name and on behalf of the Corporation as such officers
shall determine to be necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the
foregoing resolutions and to carry out the purposes thereof.

NESS ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC.
Harold Hayseed Stephens, President & Chairman


-----------------------------


Mary Gene Stephens, Secretary Treasurer


-----------------------------
§ 1336.66 Procedures and criteria for administration of the Revolving Loan Fund: Responsibilities of the Loan Administrator. Prior to the approval of any direct loan under the RLF, the Loan Administrator must develop and obtain the Commissioner's approval for the following procedures: ( a ) *Preapplication and loan screening procedures.* Some factors to be considered in the loan screening process are: ( 1 ) General eligibility criteria;
( 2 ) Potential economic development criteria;
( 3 ) Indication of business viability;
( 4 ) The need for RLF financing; and
( 5 ) The ability to properly utilize financing.
( b ) *Application process.* The application package includes forms, instructions, and policies and procedures for the loan application. The package must also include instructions for the development of a business and marketing plan and a financing proposal from the applicant.
( c ) *Loan evaluation criteria and procedures.* The loan evaluation must include the following topics: ( 1 ) General and specific business trends;
( 2 ) Potential market for the product or service;
( 3 ) Marketing strategy;
( 4 ) Management skills of the borrower;
( 5 ) Operational plan of the borrower;
( 6 ) Financial controls and accounting systems;
( 7 ) Financial projections; and
( 8 ) Structure of investment and financing package.
( d ) *Loan decision-making process.* Decision-making on a loan application includes the recommendations of the staff, the review by the loan review committee and the decision by the Board.
( e ) *Loan closing process.* The guidelines for the loan closing process include the finalization of loan terms; conditions and covenants; the exercise of reasonable and proper care to ensure adherence of the proposed loan and borrower's operations to legal requirements; and the assurance that any requirement for outside financing or other actions on which disbursement is contingent are met by the borrower.
( f ) *Loan closing documents.* Documents used in the loan closing process include: ( 1 ) *Term Sheet:* an outline of items to be included in the loan agreement. It should cover the following elements: ( i ) Loan terms;
( ii ) Security interest;
( iii ) Conditions for closing the loan;
( iv ) Covenants, including reporting requirements;
( v ) Representations and warranties;
( vi ) Defaults and remedies; and
( vii ) Other provisions as necessary.
( 2 ) *Closing Agenda:* an outline of the loan documents, the background documents, and the legal and other supporting documents required in connection with the loan.
( g ) *Loan servicing and monitoring.* The servicing of a loan will include collections, monitoring, and maintenance of an up-to-date information system on loan status. ( 1 ) *Collections:* To include a repayment schedule, invoice for each loan payment, late notices, provisions for late charges.
( 2 ) *Loan Monitoring:* To include regular reporting requirements, periodic analysis of corporate and industry information, scheduled telephone contact and site visits, regular loan review committee oversight of loan status, and systematic internal reports and files.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
D. Rinehart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:



| | 3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the
Company.

/s/ David D. Rinehart

David D. Rinehart
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 1370.3 What Government-wide and HHS-wide regulations apply to these programs? ( a ) A number of government-wide and HHS regulations apply or potentially apply to all grantees. These include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) 2 CFR part 182—Government-wide Requirements for Drug Free Workplaces;
( 2 ) 2 CFR part 376—Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension;
( 3 ) 45 CFR part 16—Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals Board;
( 4 ) 45 CFR part 30—Claims Collection;
( 5 ) 45 CFR part 46—Protection of Human Subjects;
( 6 ) 45 CFR part 75—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards
( 7 ) 45 CFR part 80—Nondiscrimi-nation Under Programs Receiving Federal Assistance Through the Department of Health and Human Services Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
( 8 ) 45 CFR part 81—Practice and Procedure for Hearings under part 80;
( 9 ) 45 CFR part 84—Nondiscrimi-nation on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance;
( 10 ) 45 CFR part 86—Nondiscrimi-nation on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance;
( 11 ) 45 CFR part 87—Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations;
( 12 ) 45 CFR part 91—Nondiscrimi-nation on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance for HHS;
( 13 ) 45 CFR part 92—Nondiscrimi-nation in Health Programs and Activities; and
( 14 ) 45 CFR part 93—New Restrictions on Lobbying. (b) A number of government-wide and HHS regulations apply to all contractors. These include but are not limited to:
( 15 ) 48 CFR Chapter 1—Federal Acquisition Regulations; and
( 16 ) 48 CFR Chapter 3—Federal Acquisition Regulations—Department of Health and Human Services.
AirResourcesBoardMaryD.Nichols,Chairman1001IStreet•P.O.Box2815MatthewRodriquezSacramento,California95812www.arb.ca.govEdmundG.BrownJr.SecretaryforGovernorEnvironmentalProtectionOctober15,2012Mr.JaredBlumenfeldRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRegion975HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,California94105DearMr.Blumenfeld:OnJuly10,2012,theSanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict(District)requestedthattheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(U.S.EPA)withdrawthe2004ExtremeOzoneAttainmentDemonstrationPlan(2004OzonePlan)fromtheStateImplementationPlan(SIP).AcopyofthisletterisprovidedinEnclosure1.TheDistrictalsocommittedtosubmitanew1-hourozoneplantoU.S.EPAbyJune2013.TheAirResourcesBoard(ARB)isworkingwiththeDistricttomeetthisJunedeadline.OnSeptember19,2012,U.S.EPAproposedtowithdrawapprovalofthe2004OzonePlan.ConsistentwiththeDistrict’sJuly10,2012request,ARBherebywithdrawsthe2004OzonePlanfromtheSIP,effectiveimmediatelyuponU.S.EPA’sfinalizationoftheproposedaction.Welookforwardtoworkingwithyouondevelopmentofthenew1-hourozoneplan.PleasecontactLynnTerry,DeputyExecutiveOfficer,at916-322-2739orlterrvcarb.ca.qovifyouhaveanyfurtherquestions.Sin947ely,//JamesN.GoldsteneI/ExecutiveOfficerEnclosurecc:Seenextpage.TheenergychallengefacingCaliforniaisreal.EveryCalifornianneedstotakeimmediateactiontoreduceenergyconsumption.Foralistofsimplewaysyoucanreducedemandandcutyourenergycosts,seeourwebsite:http://www.arb.ca.pov.CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyPrintedonRecycledPaperMr.JaredBlumenfeldOctober15,2012Page2cc:Mr.SeyedSadedrinAirPollutionControlOfficerSanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict1990EastGettysburgAvenueFresno,California93726-0244Ms.LynnTerryDeputyExecutiveOfficer
1

NO. 12-10-00017-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RODERICK CEBRON PIERSON,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted 

of aggravated robbery, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for fifty years. 

Appellant then filed his notice of appeal. 

To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of 

appeal filed by an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of 

the appellant’s right to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification should be part 

of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or 

supplementation. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal does not include the required 

certification.

On February 1, 2010, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant 

to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not 

include the trial court certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal 

would be dismissed unless, on or before March 3, 2010, the clerk’s record was amended 

to include the required certification.

The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and the clerk’s 

record has not been amended to show Appellant’s right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal 

is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered March 10, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50641 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARGARITA LUJAN-CALZADA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1906-2-DB

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nancy G. Revelette, the attorney appointed to represent Margarita Lujan-Calzada, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lujan-Calzada has filed no response to Revelette’s motion. Ou r independent review of the record and Revelette’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, Revelette’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Revelette is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### § 1703.301 Meeting place.

Meetings will be held in meeting rooms designated in the public announcement. Whenever the number of observers is greater than can be accommodated in the meeting room designated, every reasonable effort will be made to provide alternative facilities.