US. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

October 16, 2014 

Jamie and Dan Corbin 

Parents ofBrookelyn Corbin 

171 South Monroe A venue 

Bradley, IL 60915 

Dear Mrs. and Mr. Corbin: 

Exemption No. 11084 

800 Independence Ave .. S.W. 

Washington. D.C. 20591 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0728 

This letter is to infonn you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter posted September 18, 2014, Sonja Arnesen, Coordinator with Make-A-Wish Illinois, 

petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of your daughter Brookelyn 

Corbin for an exemption from§ 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

( 14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Brookelyn to exceed the specified weight 

and/or height limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft. 

The FAA has detennined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Brookelyn. 

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 

petition would not set any new precedent regarding the use of restraint systems by persons 

with disabilities. 

AFS-14-493-E 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that-

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9834; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(t), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Brookelyn Corbin an exemption from 

§ 121.311 (b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 

while Brookelyn is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311 (b) to 

the extent necessary to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft. 

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one ofBrookelyn's 

parents or a caregiver accompanying her. Brookelyn Corbin may only occupy a passenger seat 

with no passenger seated behind her. In addition, Brookelyn's parent or caregiver must carry 

a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 

48 hours before the date of each flight. 

This exemption terminates on October 31,2019, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

John Barbagallo 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure