alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1170.13 Illustrative examples. ( a ) The following examples will illustrate the application of the foregoing provisions to some of the activities funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. ( 1 ) A publication or a museum catalogue supported by the Endowment may be made usable by the blind and the visually impaired through cassette tapes, records, discs, braille, readers and simultaneous publications.
( 2 ) A lecture, meeting or symposium supported by Federal funds may be made available to deaf and hearing impaired persons through the use of a sign language interpreter or by providing scripts in advance of the performance.
( 3 ) Specific aid, benefits, or services supported by Federal funds may be offered in an inaccessible facility provided that the same aid, benefit, or service is also offered to the public at large in an accessible space.
( 4 ) A qualified handicapped person is one who is able to meet all requirements in spite of his handicap. An educational institution is not required to disregard the disabilities of handicapped individuals or to lower or to make substantial modifications of standards to accommodate a handicapped person.
( b ) State humanities committees are obligated to develop methods of administering Federal funds so as to ensure that handicapped persons are not subjected to discrimination on the basis of handicap either by sub-grantees or by the manner in which the funds are distributed.
( c ) In the event Endowment funds are utilized to construct, expand, alter, lease or rent a facility, the benefits of the program or activity provided in or through that facility must be conducted in accordance with these regulations, e.g., a museum receiving a grant to renovate an existing facility must assure that all museum aid, benefits, or services conducted in that facility are accessible to handicapped persons.
( d ) In carrying out the mandate of section 504 and these implementing regulations recipients should administer Endowment assisted programs or activities in the most integrated setting appropriate, e.g., tours made available to the hearing impaired should be open to the public at large and everyone should be permitted to enjoy the benefits of a tactile experience in a museum.
[46 FR 55897, Nov. 12, 1981, as amended at 68 FR 51386, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### American Fruit Product Company, Appellant, *v.*John G. Ward, Respondent.

*American Fruit Product Co.*v. *Ward,*113 App. Div. 319, affirmed.

(Argued November 21, 1907;

decided December 10, 1907.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 22,1906, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and affirmed an order granting an additional allowance in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*James Breeh Perhins*for appellant.

*Lewis F. Garr*for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there being no exception in the record to the referee’s report, the court is confined to an examination of the rulings on the evidence and it finds no error therein; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           2,364<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,116
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,882
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<FN>
<F1>THE BALANCE SHEET IS UNCLASSIFIED.
<F2>PP&E IS SHOWN NET ON THE BALANCE SHEET.
<F3>INTEREST EXPENSE IS CONSIDERED AN OPERATING EXPENSE OF THE REGISTRANT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             595
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          3,792
<ALLOWANCE>                                        252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,775
<DEPOSITS>                                       9,618
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                239
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,325
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  17,775
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     35
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   100
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   135
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               97
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      252
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (727)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (727)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               252
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Hanover Fire Insurance Company v. Tomlinson, appellant.

*Action-upon judgment—order (Mowing not appealable.*

An order giving plaintiff leave to bring an action against defendant upon a judgment for a deficiency upon a foreclosure sale, and for the amount of deficiency appearing by the referees’ report in an action between the same parties, *held,*not an appealable order.

*Tomlinson, Winsor*and *Marsh,*for appellants.

*Tracy, Wait*and *Olmstead,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

(First Department.)

The opinion is exceedingly brief, and is contained wholly m the head note.
Attachment as stated

cc: FEC Library

RAD

~blic Record

January 21, 1981

PUBLIC ISSUANCE OF FINAL AUDIT REPORT -

THE 1980 UNITED REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

FRED EILAND

PRESS OFFICE r, .'.

r'.t}(. BOB COSTA " I

-

WASHINCTON, D.C. 2(46)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Informational copies of the report have been received

by all parties involved and this report may be released to

the pUblic.

Attached please find a copy of the final audit report of

The 1980 United Republican Committee which was approved by the

Commission on January 9, 1981 •

FROM:

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:

TO:

..... ,

l"-.•

-...'

....
A. Overview

••

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

- _.•.• - - ,._--, •.••• -1--- r-._ _.~- ", ..-_ .. , 'I --- __0-'

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON

THE f980 UNITED REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

..

B. Key Personnel

The principal officer of the Committee during the

period audited was Mr. J. Stanley Huckaby, Treasurer.

This report is based on documents and working papers

supporting each of its factual statements. They form part of

the record upon which the Commission based its decisions on the

matters in this report and were available to Commissioners and

appropriate staff for review.

The Committee registered with the Federal Election

Commission on May 16, 1980, as a joint fundraising committee

affiliated with the Baker Committee, the Connally for President

Committee, the Crane for President Committee and the Dole for

President Committee. The Committee maintains its headquarters

in Washington, D. C.

The audit covered the period from inception through

October 15, 1980. The Committee reported an opening cash balance

of $-0-, total receipts of $132,751.50, total expenditures of

$129,848.09, and a closing cash balance of $2,903.41 during the

period.

This report covers an audit of the 1980 United

Republican Committee ("the Committee"), to determine whether

there has been compliance with the provisions of the Federal

Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Act"). The

audit was conducted pursuant to Section 9038(a) of Title 26 of

the Internal Revenue"Code which states, in part, that " a fter

each matching payment period, the Commission shall conduct a

thorough examination and audit of the qualified campaign

expenses of every candidate and his authorized committees who

received payments under Section 9037."

I. Background

-~ "...... ..

••

.....

"4 '"

-

-e
....

.... -..

C·,1

•

• ":,';J!I-2-

C. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts and expenditures and individual transactions~

review of required supporting documentation and analysis of Committee

debts and obligations~ and such other audit procedures as deemed

necessary under thQ circumstances.

II. Audit Findings- and Recommendations

Based upon examination of the reports and statements filed

and the records presented by the 1980 united Republican Committee,

no material problems in complying with the Federal Election

Campaign Act were discovered during the course of the audit•
#### § 1225.12 Precomplaint procedure.

An applicant, candidate, member or volunteer who believes that he or she is among a group of present or former CNCS national service applicants, candidates, members or volunteers, who have been illegally discriminated against and who wants to be an agent for the class shall follow those precomplaint procedures outlined in § 1225.8.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Karina K. Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Marilyn Oquendo, Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Debra Rose Samuels, J.), entered March 25, 2015, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Per Curiam. </p><p>Order (Debra Rose Samuels, J.), entered March 25, 2015, reversed, with $10 costs, defendant's motion denied, and the complaint reinstated. </p><p>The defendant MVAIC's motion for summary judgment dismissing this first-party no-fault action should have been denied. MVAIC's conflicting and contradictory submissions - wherein the assignor is variously described as a passenger, pedestrian and operator, of an unknown vehicle, an uninsured vehicle, and a vehicle owned by her husband - create rather than eliminate genuine triable issues of fact (<a href="../2016/2016_50764.htm" target="_blank"><i>see VS Care Acupuncture, PC v MVAIC</i>, 51 Misc 3d 147</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50764[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2016]; <a href="../2012/2012_51617.htm" target="_blank"><i>Dover Acupuncture, P.C. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.</i>, 36 Misc 3d 145</a>[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 51619[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2012]<a href="../2011/2011_51573.htm" target="_blank"><i>; Pomona Med. Diagnostic, P.C. v MVAIC</i>, 32 Misc 3d 140</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51573[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2011]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 24, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
3850 Three Mile Lane • McMinnville, OR 97128-9496 • USA 

Phone 503 472-0011 • Fax 503 434-4231 

www.evergreenaviation.com 

EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC.

U.S. Department of Transportation November 16, 2012 

Docket Management System 

West Building, Ground Floor, Rm W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave 

Washington, DC 20590 

 Re: Exemption Request 14CFR 121.652(a)(c), 

Ladies/Gentlemen: 

 In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR § 11.63, Evergreen 

International Airlines (EIA) petitions for an Exemption from 14 CFR 121.652 (a) and (c).

 At the time of initial issuance, EIA was an ATA member and received exemption 

extensions via ATA petitions. At this time, as a “similarly situated part 121 certificate holder,” 

Evergreen International Airlines respectfully petitions for an Exemption from 121.652(a) and 

(c) on our own behalf. Our current exemption expires on January 31, 2013. 

 Exemption No. 5549 provides relief from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

§ 121.652 (a) and (c). When granted, this will allow a new EIA pilot in command (PIC), who 

is subject to higher landing weather minimum requirements to operate to the normal, lower 

than category I and category II minimums under the stipulated conditions. 

 The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels of 

safety, which warranted the original grant of exemption, continue to exist. This exemption 

has been in use since December, 1991 with no known compromise of safety. 

 The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. EIA, in accordance with 

the provisions of 14 CFR § 11.87(a-d), Exceptions to Publication of Summary of Petition for 

Exemption, requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the 

Federal Register. No precedents will be set by granting the requested relief and this request 

is identical to previously approved requests. EIA therefore requests that publication and the 

associated comment period be waived. 

 A summary of this petition as required by 14 CFR § 11.81, the original exemption 

(docket number 26732) and exemption 5549J (docket number FAA-2000-8434) are 

attached. If any further information or discussion is required, please contact me. 

 Very truly yours, 

 

 Captain William J. Zehner 

 Director of Operations 

 Evergreen International Airlines 

 3850 Three Mile Lane 

 McMinnville, OR 97128-9496 

 (503) 472-0011 Ext 4435 

 bill.zehner@evergreenairlines.com
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 757 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 with respect to preagreement 

costs of emergency watershed protection measures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. ROMNEY (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 with respect 

to preagreement costs of emergency watershed protection 

measures, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Access To 

5 Cleanup Happen Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘MATCH Act of 

6 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 757 IS

1 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROGRAM. 

2 Section 403 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 

3 (16 U.S.C. 2203) is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(c) PREAGREEMENT COSTS.— 

6 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF SPONSOR.—In this sub7 section, the term ‘sponsor’ means— 

8 ‘‘(A) a State or local government; and 

9 ‘‘(B) an Indian Tribe (as defined in section 

10 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Edu11 cation Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)). 

12 ‘‘(2) PREAGREEMENT PROJECT COSTS.—Not 

13 later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 

14 this subsection, the Secretary shall— 

15 ‘‘(A) identify a list of emergency watershed 

16 protection measures the cost of which may be 

17 incurred by a sponsor prior to entering into an 

18 agreement with the Secretary under this sec19 tion; and 

20 ‘‘(B) develop a procedure, including appro21 priate deadlines, to be implemented at the State 

22 level, through which a sponsor may request, for 

23 a specified natural disaster, additional emer24 gency watershed protection measures the cost of 

25 which may be incurred by a sponsor prior to enVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:15 Mar 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S757.IS S757

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 757 IS

1 tering into an agreement with the Secretary 

2 under this section. 

3 ‘‘(3) AGREEMENT CONTRIBUTION.—If the Sec4 retary and a sponsor enter into an agreement under 

5 this section, the Secretary shall consider any appli6 cable preagreement costs incurred by the sponsor for 

7 undertaking emergency watershed protection meas8 ures identified under paragraph (2) as meeting part 

9 of the contribution of the sponsor toward the cost of 

10 the project. 

11 ‘‘(4) ASSUMPTION OF RISK.—A sponsor that 

12 undertakes emergency watershed protection meas13 ures prior to entering into an agreement with the 

14 Secretary under this section shall assume the risk of 

15 incurring any cost of undertaking those measures. 

16 ‘‘(5) EFFECT.—Nothing in this subsection re17 quires the Secretary to enter into an agreement with 

18 a sponsor.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 1631.21 Retaining income from sale of real estate purchased with LSC funds. ( a ) During the term of an LSC grant or contract, a recipient may retain and use income from any sale of real estate purchased with LSC funds according to 45 CFR 1630.17 (Cost Standards and Procedures: Applicability to derivative income.) and 45 CFR 1628.3 (Recipient Fund Balances: Policy.).
( b ) The recipient must account for income earned from the sale, rent, or lease of real or personal property purchased with LSC funds according to the requirements of 45 CFR 1630.17.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7481

JAMES ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES C. CONDON, Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District

Judge. (CA-97-3185-2-11)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Robinson v. Ward, No. CA-97-3185-2-11

(D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### United States Parole Commission

# Date and Time:

10 a.m., Thursday, November 16, 2006.

# Place:

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# Status:

Closed—Meeting.

# Matters Considered:

The following matters will be considered during the closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:

Petitions for reconsideration involving five original jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

# Agency Contact:

Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

Dated: November 9, 2006.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 06-9218  Filed 11-13-06; 10:24 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M