alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from SEC Form 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial information.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          1,323
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  850
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     5,139
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          5,115
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           16,922
<LOANS>                                        14,969
<ALLOWANCE>                                       175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,571
<DEPOSITS>                                     26,922
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               217
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        8,612
<OTHER-SE>                                       (780)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 34,751
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   273
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 322
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  595
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                259
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                259
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             336
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      33
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (3)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         (3)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.99
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 175
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              175
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-4079

___________ Matthew Harker, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 23, 2004 Filed: May 18, 2004

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Matthew Harker appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and concluding that his complaint allegations were legally frivolous. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying IFP status, or err in concluding that Harker’s fanciful complaint allegations were frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. 47A(a).

______________________________
# EUR-Lex - 12008E238 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12008E238

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - PART SIX: INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - TITLE I: INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - Chapter 1: The institutions - Section 3: The Council - Article 238 (ex Article 205(1) and (2), TEC) **

*
Official Journal 115 , 09/05/2008 P. 0153 - 0154 *

Article 238

(ex Article 205(1) and (2), TEC)

1. Where it is required to act by a simple majority, the Council shall act by a majority of its component members.

2. By way of derogation from Article 16(4) of the Treaty on European Union, as from 1 November 2014 and subject to the provisions laid down in the Protocol on transitional provisions, where the Council does not act on a proposal from the Commission or from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the qualified majority shall be defined as at least 72 % of the members of the Council, representing Member States comprising at least 65 % of the population of the Union.

3. As from 1 November 2014 and subject to the provisions laid down in the Protocol on transitional provisions, in cases where, under the Treaties, not all the members of the Council participate in voting, a qualified majority shall be defined as follows:

(a) A qualified majority shall be defined as at least 55 % of the members of the Council representing the participating Member States, comprising at least 65 % of the population of these States.

A blocking minority must include at least the minimum number of Council members representing more than 35 % of the population of the participating Member States, plus one member, failing which the qualified majority shall be deemed attained;

(b) By way of derogation from point (a), where the Council does not act on a proposal from the Commission or from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the qualified majority shall be defined as at least 72 % of the members of the Council representing the participating Member States, comprising at least 65 % of the population of these States.

4. Abstentions by Members present in person or represented shall not prevent the adoption by the Council of acts which require unanimity.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Wood, appellant, v. Forncrook.

*Deed—breach of covenant in.*

Defendant executed to plaintiff a deed of uninclosed and uncultivated lands containing a covenant for quiet and peaceable possession. At the time the deed was executed there was a mortgage upon the premises, and subsequently the mortgage was foreclosed and the premises sold; but the purchaser did nothing to evict the plaintiff. *Held,*that the plaintiff could not maintain an action against defendant for breach of the covenant in the deed.

Appeal from a judgment at circuit in defendant’s favor. The action was brought by FFoah Wood against Betsey 0. Forncrook to recover for an alleged breach of warranty ip a deed of land. The land conveyed by the deed was uninclosed and uncultivated; but at the time of conveyance there was an outstanding mortgage which was subsequently foreclosed, and the premises sold; but the purchaser did nothing to disturb the possession of the plaintiff. The deed to plaintiff contained a covenant for quiet and peaceable enjoyment of the possession of the premises conveyed. The purchaser of the premises at the sale under foreclosure was the husband of defendant, and he told plaintiff his rights would be sacred. At the trial the plaintiff was nonsuited, and judgment was rendered for defendant. Plaintiff appealed to this court.

*William*Roe, for appellant,

cited *Cowdrey*v. *Coit,*44 N. Y. 383; *Rome Life Ins. Co.*v. *Sherman,*46 id. 370.

*J. H. Camp,*for respondent.

Mullin, P. J.

The plaintiff was rightly nonsuited as no eviction was proved.

The owner of the legal title to uninelosed and uncultivated land is presumed to be in possession, as possession in law follows the title.

To entitle a plaintiff to recover damages for the breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment an eviction must be proved, or he may, in the event of his title being divested by a superior title, surrender possession to the owner of the superior title, or notify his grantor that he relinquishes all claim to said premises, or he may *304show that the owner of the superior title has offered them for sale. *St. John*v. *Palmer,*5 Hill, 599; *Greenvault*v. *Davis,*4 id. 643; *Cowdrey*v. *Coit,*44 N. Y. 382; *Home Life Ins. Co.*v. *Sherman,*46 id. 370.

Although the title of plaintiff was divested by the foreclosure of the mortgage and sale of the premises thereunder, the plaintiff’s possession has never been disturbed, nor has he surrendered possession, nor has the purchaser at the sale sold or offered, or even threatened to sell the premises; but on the contrary, has recognized plaintiff’s title as still valid. The judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Andrew A. White, Appellant, *v.*James A. Betts, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Respondent.

*People ex rel. White*v. *Betts,*119 App. Div. 871; 120 App. Div. 895, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted November 25, 1907;

decided November 26, 1907.)

Appeal from two orders of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered respectively April 19 and June 28, 1907, the first of which denied relator’s motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendant to dismiss a certain contempt proceeding and the second of which denied a motion to resettle the form of the order.

*A. T>. Wales*for appellant.

*John J. Lmson*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Attachment as stated

January 22, 1980

PUBLIC ISSUANCE OF AUDIT REPORT - NORTH ~ACIFIC DAIRYMEN'S COOPERATIVE TRUST

FRED EILAND

PRESS OFFICE

BOB COSTA

JUDY HAWK INS~.31. -

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASItINC rON, I> C 2114b3

Attached please find a copy of the final audit report

of the North Pacific Dairymen's Cooperative Trust which

was approved by the Commission on December 31, ~979.

Informational copies of the report have been received

by all parties involved and the report may be released to

the public •

SUBJECT:

THROUGH:

TO:

.FROM:

MEMORANDUM

....

•

,,-

co

•
t

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

\\.,...IIINLlCIN. III :1I·lhl

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

NORTH PACIFIC DAIRYMEN'S COOPERATIVE TRUST

I. Backqround

A. Overview

This report is based on an audit Qf the North

Pacific Dairymen's Cooperative Trust (lithe Committee"), undertaken by the Audit Division of the Federal Election Commission

in accordance with the Commission's audit policy to determine

whether there has been compliance with the provisions of the

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (lithe Actll) •

The audit was conducted pursuant to Section 438(a) (8) of Title 2

of the United States Code which directs the Commission to make

from time to time audits and field investigations with respect

to reports and statements filed under the provisions of the Act.

The Committee registered with the United States House

of Representatives on October 15, 1974, as the political action

committee of che ~orthwest Dairymen's Association. The purpose

of the ComI"littee is to promote the welfare of Northwest dairy

f~rmers and their cooperatives and/or American a~riculture in

qeneral. The Committee maintains its headquarters in Seattle,

Washington.

The audit covered the period January 1, 1977 through

September 30, 1979, the final coverage date of the latest report

filed by the Committee at the time of the audit. During the

period, the Committee reported a beginninq cash balance of

$1,283.51, total receipts of $3,125.00, total expenditures of

$3,409.68, and a closing cash balance on September 30, 1979 of

$998.83.

This audit report is based on documents and working

papers which support each of the factual statements. They form

part of the record upon which the Commission based its decisions

on the m~tters in the report and were available to Commissioners

and appropriate staff for review.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L U I S O R L A N D O Z E L C H A N , a .k .a . L u is O rl ando E l C han; M A R T H A A L IC IA O R O Z C O A G U I L A R , a . k. a . M artha A l i ci o R oscoe- A gu i l ar , P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73939 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 316- 003

A 095- 316- 004 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L ui s O r l a ndo Z e l C ha n a nd M arthaA l i c i aO r oz c o A gui l ar , na t i ve s a nd ci t i zen s o f M ex i co , p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew o f th e B o ardo f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o r e ope n r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU N 09 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73939 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am o t i o n t o r e o p e n a n dd e n o v o q u e s t i o n s o f l aw, I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n , b e c au s e th e B I A c o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e th e ys ub m itte da n da c te dw ith in i t s br oa d di s c r e t i on i n de t e rm i ni ng tha tthe e vi de nc e w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o w arr ant r e o p e n in g . Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 2 9 5 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ) ( T h e B IA ’s de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n s ha l l be r e ve r s e d onl yi f i ti s “ arbi tr ary , i rr a t i ona l , or contraryt o l aw . ”) . T o th e e x te n t p e titio n e r s c o n te n dth a t th e B I A f a ile dto c o n s id e rs o m e o ra ll o f th e e v i d e n c e th e ys ub mi tt e dw i th th e mo t i o n t o r e o p e n , th e yh a v e n o to v e r c o me th e p r e s u m p tio n th a t th e B I A d idr e v ie w th e r e c o r d . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 43 9 F . 3d 59 2, 60 3 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). P e t i t i one r s ’ r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e una va i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 924 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend the 

Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. 

WARNER, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act 

to extend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake and Ohio 

5 Canal National Historical Park Commission Extension 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 924 IS

1 SEC. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTOR2 ICAL PARK COMMISSION. 

3 Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal De4 velopment Act (16 U.S.C. 410y–4(g)) is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘40’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

6 end and inserting ‘‘on September 30, 2034.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0059**
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In fhe Matter of 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Service Employees Intemational Union 

Conimittee on Political Education (SEIU 

COPE) 

A09-28 

Agenda Documents No. 11-54 and No. 

11-54-A 

CERTinCATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, recording secretaiy for the Federal Election Commission 

open meeting on October 20,2011, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote of 

5-0 to approve Agenda Docmnent No. 11-54-A and authonze stafif to make any necessary 

technical and conforming edits. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Himter, McGahn n, Petersen and Weintraub voted affinnatively 

for the decision. Commissioner Walther did not vote. 

Attest: 

Date ^ Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Coinmission
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 23635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09914]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9113]

In the Matter of the Designation of Nikolaos Maziotis. Also Known 
as Nikos Maziotis as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant 
to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of E.O. 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by E.O. 13268 of July 
2, 2002, and E.O. 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that 
the individual known as Nikolaos Maziotis, also known as Nikos 
Maziotis, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of 
terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national 
security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of E.O. 13224 that 
``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who 
might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render 
ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order 
because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I determine 
that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this 
determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United 
States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures 
authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 20, 2015.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-09914 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Lance K. Bradford, as the Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Group, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A of Vestin Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Group,Inc. and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinGroup, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Group, Inc.’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in Vestin Group, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Group, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, VestinGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Group, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Group, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Group, Inc.’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2005
/s/ Lance K. BradfordLance K. Bradford
# PAC Table 8c

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/25/20.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Presidential Documents 64109 

Notice of October 27, 2006 

Continuation of National Emergency Regarding the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

(weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 amending 

Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat 

of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, 

I issued Executive Order 13382 that, inter alia, further amended Executive 

Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. Because the 

proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering 

them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national 

emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, must continue in effect 

beyond November 14, 2006. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 27, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 06–9021 

Filed 10–30–06; 12:12 pm] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>