alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles S. Halsted, Appellant, *v.*Union Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Catharine C. Halsted, Deceased, Respondent.

*Halsted*v. *Union Trust Go.,*ISO App. Div. 876, affirmed.

(Argued December 18, 1907;

decided January 7, 1908.)

Appeal from a judgment entered September 6, 1907, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action for the construction of a will and for an accounting.

*Ceorge W. Oarr*for appellant.

*Benjamin A. Morton*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
§ 292.60 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The regulations of this subpart set forth the rules and procedures by which the Forest Service regulates mineral operations on National Forest System lands within the Smith River National Recreation Area as established by Congress in the Smith River National Recreation Area Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 460bbb *et seq.*).
( b ) *Scope.* The rules of this subpart apply only to mineral operations on National Forest System lands within the Smith River National Recreation Area.
( c ) *Applicability of other rules.* The rules of this subpart supplement existing Forest Service regulations concerning the review, approval, and administration of mineral operations on National Forest System lands including, but not limited to, those set forth at parts 228, 251, and 261 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conflicts.* In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the rules of this subpart and other parts of this chapter, the rules of this subpart take precedence, to the extent allowable by law.
§ 205.70 Availability of agency program manuals. *State plan requirements.* A State plan for financial assistance under title I, IV-A, IV-B, X, XIV, or XVI (AABD) of the Social Security Act must provide that: ( a ) Program manuals and other policy issuances which affect the public, including the State agency's rules and regulations governing eligibility, need and amount of assistance, and recipient rights and responsibilities will be maintained in the State office and in each local and district office for examination on regular workdays during regular office hours by individuals, upon request for review, study, or reproduction by the individual.
( b ) ( 1 ) A current copy of such material will be made available without charge or at a charge related to the cost of reproduction for access by the public through custodians who ( i ) request the material for this purpose,
( ii ) are centrally located and publicly accessible to a substantial number of the recipient population they serve, and
( iii ) agree to accept responsibility for filing all amendments and changes forwarded by the agency.
( 2 ) Under this requirement the material, if requested, must be made available without charge or at a charge related to the cost of reproduction to public or university libraries, the local or district offices of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and welfare or legal services offices or organizations. The material may also be made available, with or without charge, to other groups and to individuals. Wide availability of agency policy materials is recommended.
( c ) Upon request, the agency will reproduce without charge or at a charge related to the cost of reproduction the specific policy materials necessary for an applicant or recipient, or his representative, to determine whether a fair hearing should be requested or to prepare for a fair hearing; and will establish policies for reproducing policy materials without charge, or at a charge related to cost, for any individual who requests such material for other purposes.
[38 FR 26378, Sept. 20, 1973, as amended at 44 FR 17941, Mar. 23, 1979; 45 FR 56685, Aug. 25, 1980]
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 34 

Establishing the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 

for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 

the United States on January 20, 2025. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Establishing the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies for the inauguration of the Presidentelect and Vice President-elect of the United States on 

January 20, 2025. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

4 There is established a Joint Congressional Committee 

5 on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as 

6 the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 

7 Members of the House of Representatives, to be appointed 

8 by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 34 ATS 

1 House of Representatives, respectively. The joint com2 mittee is authorized to make the necessary arrangements 

3 for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice Presi4 dent-elect of the United States on January 20, 2025. 

5 SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE. 

6 The joint committee— 

7 (1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equip8 ment and the services of appropriate personnel of 

9 departments and agencies of the Federal Govern10 ment, under arrangements between the joint com11 mittee and the heads of those departments and 

12 agencies, in connection with the inaugural pro13 ceedings and ceremonies; and 

14 (2) may accept gifts and donations of goods 

15 and services to carry out its responsibilities. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY7, 1997 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, February 10, 1997 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By David G. Marcos, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex. RES REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

..... 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc No SUBJECT BY 

-

-
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

23 78 Charlene Barshefsky, of the District of Columbia, Feb 3, 97 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

to be United States Trade Representative, Committee on Finance, without 

With the rank of Ambassador Extraordinary printed report. 

and Plenipotentiary, vice Michael Kantor. 

Szgmfies nommee's commztment to respond to requests to appear and testzfy before any duly constztuted commzttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40715

Conference Calendar

 

ROBERT TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UTMB GALVESTON TEXAS; ENI IKEDINOBI, DR.,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-00-CV-548

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Taylor, Texas prisoner # 781985, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his pro se, in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, which alleged a violation of his Eighth

Amendment rights in connection with the medical treatment he

received following a laceration to his wrist while working in the

prison laundry. The district court dismissed the complaint as

frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
No. 03-40715

-2-

The district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing the complaint. Taylor’s allegations amounted to

claims for negligence or medical malpractice, which are not

cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429

U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th

Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED. 

The district court’s dismissal as frivolous counts as one

strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g); see Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th

Cir. 1996). Taylor is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three

strikes he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal

filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

AFFIRMED, SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
From: Freeman, Jeremiah (CONTR) [mailto:Jeremiah.Freeman@ee.doe.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:02 PM

To: 'Richard Parker'; Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos

Siqueiros; Caskey, John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Creevy, Jim; Cohen, Daniel; Daniel

Young; Eduardo Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Peterson; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Tiedeman,

Jennifer; Jerry Schoen; Raba, Jim; Joanna Mauer; Cymbalsky, John; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti;

Savitz, Maxine (EMAB); Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest ; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski, Raymond; Rob

Greeson; Robert Berman; Van Buskirk, Robert (CONTR); Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Steve Nadel;

Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Patzner; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vijay Tendulkar; Wes

Patterson; Zhimei Luo; Savitz, Maxine (EMAB); 'artrosenfeld@gmail.com'

Cc: Cymbalsky, John; Sydnor, Simone (CONTR); Ma rchetti, Emily (CONTR); Edwards, Brenda; Caitlin

Johnson

Subject: 11/17/2011 MV Webinar on SharePoint

Hello All,

Happy Thanksgiving Week!

Just wanted to send an email so everyone was aware that the recording of November 17th webinar for

the MV Working group is now on the MV SharePoint. The file was 183 MB and so was broken into 5

separate files to be able to successfully upload them.

The files are la beled "E RAC 11

‐ 17

‐ 11 Distribution Transformer Webinar (MV Group) part x of 5" and can

be found under the Meeting Transcripts and Presentations Folder (under the subfolder November 17,

2011 Webinar).

Once I receive the LV Working Group Recording I will break that file up and post it to the LV SharePoint

site (likely Monday of next week). Please feel free to reach out wi th any questions.

Everyone have a great holiday, enjoy it safely.

Very Respectfully,

Jeremiah Freeman

New West Technologies, LLC

In support of:

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Office: 202

‐ 586

‐ 1867

Cell: 202

‐ 431

‐ 4243

Alternative mail: jfreeman@nwttech.co m
#### § 1703.403 Requests for records under Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts.

Requests to review or obtain copies of records other than the minutes of a meeting will be processed under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) or, where applicable, the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a).
#### § 222.25 Costs.

The Forest Service shall cover only those costs incurred by its own employees in mediation sessions.
#### § 1622.3 Open meetings.

Every meeting of the Board, a committee or a council shall be open in its entirety to public observation except as otherwise provided in § 1622.5.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Maria de la Luz, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of La Cortez Enterprises,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of February, 2007.


/s/ Maria de la Luz
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

 

The Board of Directors andStockholders 

Alberto-Culver Company: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Number 333-138794) and Form S-3 (Numbers 333-49649 and 333-54302) of Alberto-Culver Company of our reports dated December 12, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of Alberto-Culver Company and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and stockholders’ equity and the related financial statement schedule for each of theyears in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of September 30, 2006, which reports appear in the September 30, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Alberto-Culver Company. 

Ourreport refers to changes in the Company’s method of accounting for stock-based compensation effective October 1, 2005. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

December 12, 2006
1 The Honorable Laurie Smith-Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2049

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Arturo Cardenas-Gutierrez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 17, 2003 Filed: February 5, 2004

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arturo Cardenas-Gutierrez was convicted of possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1). His sentence included 235 months of imprisonment, 5 years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. He now appeals, contending that the district court 1 erred by denying his motions for continuance, for dismissal, and for acquittal. We affirm.-2- On the day trial was to begin, Cardenas-Gutierrez moved for a continuance to secure the appearance of his uncle, “Romero,” whom Cardenas-Gutierrez claimed to have been traveling to see when he was arrested in Nebraska. At the time of his arrest, Cardenas-Gutierrez said that his uncle lived in New Jersey, but was unable to provide a last name, city of residence, or telephone number. Cardenas-Gutierrez did not specify in his motion what relevant testimony his uncle, whose whereabouts he claimed to have just discovered, would give. We review a denial of a motion to continue for abuse of discretion, United States v. Vesey , 330 F.3d 1070, 1071-72 (8th Cir. 2003). No abuse of discretion is shown here, for Cardenas-Gutierrez failed to “make some plausible showing of how [the] testimony would have been both material and favorable to his defense.” United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal , 458 U.S. 858, 867 (1982). Following the government’s case-in-chief, and again following the jury’s guilty verdict, Cardenas-Gutierrez moved for judgment of acquittal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, United States v. Smith , 104 F.3d 145, 147 (8th Cir. 1997), we conclude that a reasonable juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Cardenas-Gutierrez possessed and intended to distribute the methamphetamine found in the car. United States v. Buford , 108 F.3d 151, 153 (8th Cir. 1997). Finally, Cardenas-Gutierrez argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for new trial. The only mention of such a motion was the district court’s immediately corrected mischaracterization of defendant’s motion for acquittal. Cardenas-Gutierrez in fact made no motion for new trial.
The conviction is affirmed.

______________________________
§ 1159.9 What identification will I need to show when I request access to Endowment records pertaining to me? The Endowment shall require reasonable identification of all individuals who request access to records in an Endowment system to ensure that they are disclosed to the proper person. ( a ) The amount of personal identification required will of necessity vary with the sensitivity of the record involved. In general, if you request disclosure in person, you shall be required to show an identification card, such as a driver's license, containing your photograph and sample signature. However, with regard to records in Endowment systems that contain particularly sensitive and/or detailed personal information, the Endowment reserves the right to require additional means of identification as are appropriate under the circumstances. These means include, but are not limited to, requiring you to sign a statement under oath as to your identity, acknowledging that you are aware of the penalties for improper disclosure under the provisions of the Privacy Act.
( b ) If you request disclosure by mail, the Endowment will request such information as may be necessary to ensure that you are properly identified. Authorized means to achieve this goal include, but are not limited to, requiring that a mail request include certification that a duly commissioned notary public of any State or territory (or a similar official, if the request is made outside of the United States) received an acknowledgment of identity from you.
( c ) If you are unable to provide suitable documentation or identification, the Endowment may require a signed, notarized statement asserting your identity and stipulating that you understand that knowingly or willfully seeking or obtaining access to records about another person under false pretenses is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. 

Under Contract No. N40080-10-D-0492 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60142 

Joseph H. Kasimer, Esq. 

Kasimer Pierce & Schaecher PC 

Tysons Comer, VA 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Appellant has moved to dismiss this appeal, with prejudice, due to a settlement 

that it reached with the government. This is consistent with a 30 September 2016 filing 

with the Board explaining that the matter had settled and that a motion to dismiss would 

be filed shortly. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 18 October 2016 

J. REID PROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60142, Appeal of John C. Grimberg 

Co., Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Arm~d Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of HK Battery Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jianguo Xu,, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ Jianguo XuName:Jianguo XuTitle:Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)Date:June 20, 2014