40258 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

becoming free of restraint under 

dynamic loading. The dynamic loading 

of § 25.562(b)(2) is considered an 

acceptable dynamic event. The 

applicant may propose an alternate 

pulse; however, the impulse and peak 

load may not be less than that of 

§ 25.562(b)(2). As an alternative to a 

dynamic test, static testing may be used 

if the loading is assessed as equivalent 

as or more critical than a dynamic test, 

based upon validated dynamic analysis. 

Both the primary directional loading 

and rebound conditions need to be 

assessed. 

5. Instructions for Continued 

Airworthiness. The instructions for 

continued airworthiness must reflect the 

fastening method used and must ensure 

the reliability of the methods used (e.g., 

life limit of adhesives, or clamp 

connection). Inspection methods and 

intervals must be defined based upon 

adhesion data from the manufacturer of 

the adhesive or actual adhesion test 

data, if necessary. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25, 

2012. 

K.C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–16720 Filed 7–6–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 748 

[Docket No. 120608159–2159–01] 

RIN 0694–AF71 

Amendment to Existing Validated EndUser Authorizations: Hynix 

Semiconductor China Ltd., Hynix 

Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd., and 

Boeing Tianjin Composites Co. Ltd. in 

the People’s Republic of China 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this rule, the Bureau of 

Industry and Security (BIS) amends the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR) to revise the existing 

Authorization Validated End-User 

(VEU) listings for three VEUs in the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC). 

Specifically, BIS amends the EAR to 

change the names of existing VEUs 

Hynix Semiconductor China Ltd. and 

Hynix Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd. and 

their respective ‘‘Eligible Destinations’’ 

in the PRC. Also, BIS amends the list of 

‘‘Eligible Items (by ECCN)’’ that may be 

exported, reexported and transferred 

(in-country) to the approved facility of 

VEU Boeing Tianjin Composites Co. Ltd. 

(BTC) in the PRC. These changes are 

prompted by factors arising from the 

companies’ normal course of business, 

and are not the result of any activities 

of concern by the companies. 

DATES: This rule is effective July 9, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User 

Review Committee, Bureau of Industry 

and Security, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; by 

telephone: (202) 482–5991, fax: (202) 

482–3991, or email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Authorization Validated End-User 

BIS amended the EAR in a final rule 

on June 19, 2007 (72 FR 33646), creating 

a new authorization for ‘‘Validated endusers’’ (VEUs) located in eligible 

destinations to which eligible items may 

be exported, reexported, or transferred 

(in-country) under a general 

authorization instead of a license, in 

conformance with section 748.15 of the 

EAR. VEUs may obtain eligible items 

that are on the Commerce Control List, 

set forth in Supplement No. 1 to Part 

774 of the EAR, without having to wait 

for their suppliers to obtain export 

licenses from BIS. Eligible items may 

include commodities, software, and 

technology, except those controlled for 

missile technology or crime control 

reasons. 

The VEUs listed in Supplement No. 7 

to Part 748 of the EAR were reviewed 

and approved by the U.S. Government 

in accordance with the provisions of 

section 748.15 and Supplement Nos. 8 

and 9 to Part 748 of the EAR. The 

revisions to Supplement No. 7 to Part 

748 set forth in this rule are being made 

either at the request of the VEUs or 

pursuant to the U.S. Government’s 

periodic review of VEU authorizations, 

and were approved by the End-User 

Review Committee (ERC) following the 

process set forth in Section 748.15 and 

Supplement No. 9 to Part 748 of the 

EAR. 

Amendment to Existing Validated EndUser Authorizations in the PRC 

Revision to Names of Hynix 

Semiconductor China Ltd. and Hynix 

Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd. and Their 

‘‘Eligible destinations’’ 

In this rule, BIS amends Supplement 

No. 7 to Part 748 of the EAR to change 

the names of existing VEUs Hynix 

Semiconductor China Ltd. and Hynix 

Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd. and the 

names of the companies’ respective 

‘‘Eligible destinations’’ (i.e., facilities) in 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC). 

Both companies were designated as 

VEUs on October 12, 2010 (75 FR 

62462). 

In this rule, the name Hynix 

Semiconductor China Ltd. is changed to 

SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd., 

and the name of the company’s existing 

approved ‘‘Eligible destination’’ is 

changed from Hynix Semiconductor 

China Ltd. to SK hynix Semiconductor 

(China) Ltd. In addition, the name 

Hynix Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd. is 

changed to SK hynix Semiconductor 

(Wuxi) Ltd., and the name of the 

company’s existing approved ‘‘Eligible 

destination’’ is changed from Hynix 

Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd. to SK hynix 

Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd. The 

addresses of the companies’ respective 

‘‘Eligible destinations’’ remain the same. 

These amendments are prompted by 

factors arising from the companies’ 

normal course of business, and are not 

the result of activities of concern by the 

companies. 

Revision to the List of ‘‘Eligible items (by 

ECCN)’’ for Boeing Tianjin Composites 

Co. Ltd. 

BIS designated BHA Aero Composite 

Parts Co. as a VEU on October 19, 2007 

(72 FR 59164). On April 29, 2009, BIS 

amended the authorization by changing 

the name of the VEU to Boeing Tianjin 

Composites Co., Ltd. (BTC) (74 FR 

19382). In addition, on February 24, 

2012, BIS amended BTC’s VEU 

authorization to correct the address of 

BTC’s eligible destination and revise the 

list of ‘‘Eligible items (by ECCN)’’ that 

may be exported, reexported, and 

transferred (in-country) to BTC (77 FR 

10953). In this rule, BIS further revises 

the list of ‘‘Eligible items (by ECCN)’’ 

that may be exported, reexported, and 

transferred (in-country) to BTC. This 

amendment is prompted by factors 

arising from BTC’s normal course of 

business, and is not the result of 

activities of concern by BTC. 

BTC’s list of ‘‘Eligible items (by 

ECCN)’’ prior to the publication of this 

rule was: 

1A002.a, 1B001.f, 1C010.b, 1C010.e, 1D001 

(limited to ‘‘software’’ specially designed or 

modified for the ‘‘development’’, 

‘‘production’’ or ‘‘use’’ of equipment 

controlled by 1B001.f), 1E001 (limited to 

‘‘technology’’ according to the General 

Technology Note for the ‘‘development’’ or 

‘‘production’’ of items controlled by 1A002.a, 

1B001.f, and 1C010.b & .e), 2B001.b.2 

(limited to machine tools with accuracies no 

better than (i.e., less than) 13 microns), 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 40259 

2B001.e, 2D001 (limited to ‘‘software,’’ other 

than that controlled by 2D002, specially 

designed or modified for the ‘‘development’’, 

‘‘production’’ or ‘‘use’’ of equipment 

controlled by 2B001.b.2 and 2B001.e), and 

2D002 (limited to ‘‘software’’ for electronic 

devices, even when residing in an electronic 

device or system, enabling such devices or 

systems to function as a ‘‘numerical control’’ 

unit, capable of coordinating simultaneously 

more than 4 axes for ‘‘contouring control’’ 

controlled by 2B001.b.2 and 2B001.e). 

With this rule, BTC’s revised list of 

‘‘Eligible items (by ECCN)’’ is: 

1B001.f, 1D001 (limited to ‘‘software’’ 

specially designed or modified for the ‘‘use’’ 

of equipment controlled by 1B001.f), 

2B001.b.2 (limited to machine tools with 

accuracies no better than (i.e., not less than) 

13 microns), 2D001 (limited to ‘‘software,’’ 

other than that controlled by 2D002, 

specially designed or modified for the ‘‘use’’ 

of equipment controlled by 2B001.b.2), and 

2D002 (limited to ‘‘software’’ for electronic 

devices, even when residing in an electronic 

device or system, enabling such devices or 

systems to function as a ‘‘numerical control’’ 

unit, capable of coordinating simultaneously 

more than 4 axes for ‘‘contouring control’’ 

controlled by 2B001.b.2). 

Since August 21, 2001, the Export 

Administration Act (the Act) has been 

in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 

2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 

(2002)), as extended most recently by 

the Notice of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 

50661 (August 16, 2011), has continued 

the EAR in effect under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out 

the provisions of the Act, as appropriate 

and to the extent permitted by law, 

pursuant to Executive Order 13222. 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, 

reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and 

promoting flexibility. This rule has been 

determined to be not significant for 

purposes of Executive Order 12866. 

2. This rule involves collections 

previously approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) under 

Control Number 0694–0088, ‘‘MultiPurpose Application,’’ which carries a 

burden hour estimate of 43.8 minutes to 

prepare and submit form BIS–748; and 

for recordkeeping, reporting and review 

requirements in connection with 

Authorization VEU, which carries an 

estimated burden of 30 minutes per 

submission. This rule is expected to 

result in a decrease in license 

applications submitted to BIS. Total 

burden hours associated with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA) and OMB 

Control Number 0694–0088 are not 

expected to increase significantly as a 

result of this rule. 

Notwithstanding any other provisions 

of law, no person is required to respond 

nor be subject to a penalty for failure to 

comply with a collection of information, 

subject to the requirements of the PRA, 

unless that collection of information 

displays a currently valid OMB Control 

Number. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined under Executive Order 

13132. 

4. Pursuant to the Administrative 

Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), BIS finds good cause to waive 

requirements that this rule be subject to 

notice and the opportunity for public 

comment because such notice and 

comment here are unnecessary and 

contrary to the public interest. In 

determining whether to grant VEU 

designations, a committee of U.S. 

Government agencies evaluates 

information about and commitments 

made by candidate companies, the 

nature and terms of which are set forth 

in 15 CFR part 748, Supplement No. 8. 

The criteria for evaluation by the 

committee are set forth in 15 CFR 

748.15(a)(2). 

The information, commitments, and 

criteria for this extensive review were 

all established through the notice of 

proposed rulemaking and public 

comment process (71 FR 38313, July 2, 

2006 (proposed rule), and 72 FR 33646, 

June 19, 2007 (final rule)). Given the 

similarities between the authorizations 

provided under the VEU program and 

export licenses (as discussed further 

below), the publication of this 

information does not establish new 

policy; in publishing this final rule, BIS 

simply amends three VEU 

authorizations by updating the names of 

two end users and revising the ‘‘Eligible 

items (by ECCN)’’ of another end user. 

These changes have been made within 

the established regulatory framework of 

the Authorization VEU program. 

Further, this rule does not abridge the 

rights of the public or eliminate the 

public’s option to export under any of 

the forms of authorization set forth in 

the EAR. 

Publication of this rule in other than 

final form is unnecessary because the 

authorization granted in the rule is 

consistent with the authorizations 

granted to exporters for individual 

licenses (and amendments or revisions 

thereof), which do not undergo public 

review. Just as license applicants do, 

VEU authorization applicants provide 

the U.S. Government with confidential 

business information. This information 

is extensively reviewed according to the 

criteria for VEU authorizations, as set 

out in 15 CFR 748.15(a)(2). 

Additionally, just as the interagency 

reviews license applications, the 

authorizations granted under the VEU 

program involve interagency 

deliberation and result from review of 

public and non-public sources, 

including licensing data, and the 

measurement of such information 

against the VEU authorization criteria. 

Given the thorough nature of the review, 

and in light of the parallels between the 

VEU application review process and the 

review of license applications, public 

comment on this authorization and 

subsequent amendments prior to 

publication is unnecessary. Moreover, 

because, as noted above, the criteria and 

process for authorizing and 

administering VEUs were developed 

with public comments; allowing 

additional public comment on this 

amendment to individual VEU 

authorizations, which was determined 

according to those criteria, is 

unnecessary. Finally, allowing for prior 

public notice and comment is contrary 

to the public interest because it could 

cause confusion with the VEU status of 

the three companies identified in this 

rule due to the change of VEU names for 

two of those companies, and the items 

that may be exported, reexported or 

transferred (in-country) without a 

license to one of those companies. 

Section 553(d) of the APA generally 

provides that rules may not take effect 

earlier than thirty (30) days after they 

are published in the Federal Register. 

BIS finds good cause to waive the 

requirement of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to 

delay the effectiveness of this 

regulation, because such a delay is 

unnecessary. BIS simply amends three 

VEU authorizations by updating the 

names of two end users and revising the 

‘‘Eligible items (by ECCN)’’ of another 

end user. These changes have been 

made within the established regulatory 

framework of the Authorization VEU 

program. Further, this rule does not 

abridge the rights of the public or 

eliminate the public’s option to export 

under any of the forms of authorization 

set forth in the EAR. Delaying this 

action’s effectiveness could cause 

confusion with the VEU status of the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
40260 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

three companies identified in this rule 

due to the change of VEU names for two 

of those companies, and the items that 

may be exported, reexported or 

transferred (in-country) without a 

license to one of those companies. 

Accordingly, it would be unnecessary 

and contrary to the public interest to 

delay this rule’s effectiveness. 

No other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this final rule. Because a 

notice of proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required under the APA or by any other 

law, the analytical requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.) are not applicable and no 

regulatory flexibility analysis has been 

prepared. 

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 748 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Exports, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Accordingly, Part 748 of the EAR (15 

CFR parts 730–774) is amended as 

follows: 

PART 748—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

Part 748 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 

3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 

FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice 

of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 (August 16, 

2011). 

■ 2. Supplement No. 7 to Part 748 is 

amended in ‘‘China (People’s Republic 

of)’’ by: 

■ a. Revising the entry for ‘‘Boeing 

Tianjin Composites Co. Ltd.’’; 

■ b. Removing the entries for ‘‘Hynix 

Semiconductor China Ltd.’’, and ‘‘Hynix 

Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd.’’; and 

■ c. Adding new entries for ‘‘SK hynix 

Semiconductor (China) Ltd.’’, and ‘‘SK 

hynix Semiconductor (Wuxi) Ltd.’’ in 

alphabetical order. 

The revisions and additions read as 

follows: 

SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO PART 748—AUTHORIZATION VALIDATED END-USER (VEU); LIST OF VALIDATED END-USERS, 

RESPECTIVE ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR EXPORT, REEXPORT AND TRANSFER, AND ELIGIBLE DESTINATIONS

Country Validated end 

user Eligible items (by ECCN) Eligible destination Federal Register citation 

*******

China (People’s 

Republic of) 

*******

Boeing Tianjin 

Composites Co. 

Ltd.

1B001.f, 1D001 (limited to ‘‘software’’ specially designed or modified for the ‘‘use’’ of equipment 

controlled by 1B001.f), 2B001.b.2 

(limited to machine tools with accuracies no better than (i.e., not 

less than) 13 microns), 2D001 

(limited to ‘‘software,’’ other than 

that controlled by 2D002, specially 

designed or modified for the ‘‘use’’ 

of equipment controlled by 

2B001.b.2), and 2D002 (limited to 

‘‘software’’ for electronic devices, 

even when residing in an electronic device or system, enabling 

such devices or systems to function as a ‘‘numerical control’’ unit, 

capable of coordinating simultaneously more than 4 axes for 

‘‘contouring control’’ controlled by 

2B001.b.2).

Boeing Tianjin 

Composites Co. 

Ltd., No. 4–388 

Hebei Road, 

Tanggu Tianjin, 

China.

72 FR 59164, 10/19/07. 

74 FR 19381, 4/29/09. 

77 FR 10953, 2/24/12. 

77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], 7/9/ 

12. 

*******

SK hynix Semiconductor 

(China) Ltd.

3B001.a, 3B001.b, 3B001.c, 

3B001.d, 3B001.e, and 3B001.f.

SK hynix Semiconductor 

(China) Ltd., 

Lot K7/K7–1, 

Export Processing Zone, 

Wuxi, Jiangsu, 

China.

75 FR 62462, 10/12/10. 

77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], 7/9/ 

12. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 131 / Monday, July 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 40261 

SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO PART 748—AUTHORIZATION VALIDATED END-USER (VEU); LIST OF VALIDATED END-USERS, 

RESPECTIVE ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR EXPORT, REEXPORT AND TRANSFER, AND ELIGIBLE DESTINATIONS—Continued 

Country Validated end 

user Eligible items (by ECCN) Eligible destination Federal Register citation 

SK hynix Semiconductor 

(Wuxi) Ltd.

3B001.a, 3B001.b, 3B001.c, 

3B001.d, 3B001.e, and 3B001.f.

SK hynix Semiconductor 

(Wuxi) Ltd., Lot 

K7/K7–1, Export Processing 

Zone, Wuxi, 

Jiangsu, China.

75 FR 62462, 10/12/10. 

77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], 7/9/ 

12. 

*******

Dated: June 29, 2012. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–16724 Filed 7–6–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

Information Security Oversight Office 

32 CFR Part 2003 

[NARA–12–0003] 

RIN 3095–AB76 

The Interagency Security Classification 

Appeals Panel (ISCAP) Bylaws, Rules, 

and Appeal Procedures 

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight 

Office, National Archives and Records 

Administration. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Interagency Security 

Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) is 

a Presidential panel that decides on 

certain classification and 

declassification issues, as established in 

Executive Order 13526, Classified 

National Security Information, 

December 29, 2009, section 5.3(a)(1), 

and the E.O.’s implementing directives. 

Section 5.3(c) of the E.O. directs ISCAP 

to issue bylaws, rules, and procedures 

and to publish them in the Federal 

Register. ISCAP previously published 

its bylaws as a regulatory appendix, 

Classified National Security Information 

Directive No. 1. This rule revamps 

ISCAP’s bylaws and appellate 

procedures and publishes them in their 

own part for easier access. 

DATES: This rule is effective September 

7, 2012, without further action, unless 

adverse comment is received by August 

8, 2012. If adverse comment is received, 

NARA will publish a timely withdrawal 

of the rule in the Federal Register. 

ADDRESSES: NARA invites interested 

persons to submit comments on this 

direct final rule. Please include ‘‘Attn: 

3095–AB76 and your name and mailing 

address in your comments. Comments 

may be submitted by any of the 

following methods: 

D Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

D Fax: Submit comments by facsimile 

transmission to 301–837–0319, attention 

Regulations Comments Desk. 

D Mail: Send comments to Strategy 

and Policy Office (SP); Regulations 

Comments Desk, Room 4100; National 

and Archives Records Administration; 

ATTN: Laura McCarthy; 8601 Adelphi 

Road; College Park, MD 20740. 

D Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver 

comments to 8601 Adelphi Road, 

College Park, MD. Address them to 

Strategy and Policy Office (SP); 

Regulations Comments Desk, Room 

4100, Attn: Laura McCarthy. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

P. Fitzpatrick, Director, ISOO, at 202– 

357–5250. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ISCAP is a 

Presidential appellate panel made up of 

representatives from the Departments of 

State, Defense, and Justice, the National 

Archives and Records Administration, 

the Office of the Director of National 

Intelligence, and the National Security 

Advisor, with an occasional 

representative from the Central 

Intelligence Agency. The director of the 

Information Security Oversight Office 

(ISOO), a unit of the National Archives 

and Records Administration (NARA), 

has been tasked by E.O. 13526 as the 

Panel’s Executive Secretary, and the 

ISOO staff as the administrative staff 

supporting the Panel. As a result, the 

ISCAP bylaws and appellate procedures 

are published by NARA along with 

other ISOO regulations. 

ISCAP’s bylaws were previously 

published in 2004 as Appendix A to 

ISOO’s Directive 1. When ISOO’s 

directive was updated in 2009, the 

ISCAP bylaws were not included as an 

appendix again, and are now being 

added, along with appellate procedures, 

for publication as Part 2003. Publishing 

ISCAP’s bylaws and appellate 

procedures in a separate part will make 

them easier to find and to use. 

This rule is effective upon publication 

for good cause as permitted by the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(3)). NARA believes that delaying 

the effective date for 30 days is 

unnecessary as this rule represents 

minor technical amendments from the 

previous by-laws as mandated by E.O. 

13526. 

This direct final rule is not a 

significant regulatory action for the 

purposes of E.O. 12866 and has [not] 

been reviewed by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB). The 

proposed amendment is also not a major 

rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. chapter 8, 

Congressional Review of Agency 

Rulemaking. As required by the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, we certify 

that this rule will not have a significant 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities because it sets out only the 

bylaws by which the Panel will operate 

and the review procedures for Federal 

agency declassification actions. 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 2003 

Classified information. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, NARA adds 32 CFR part 

2003, to read as follows: 

PART 2003—INTERAGENCY 

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 

APPEALS PANEL (ISCAP) BYLAWS, 

RULES, AND APPEAL PROCEDURES 

Subpart A—Bylaws 

Sec. 

2003.1 Purpose (Article I). 

2003.2 Authority (Article II). 

2003.3 Functions (Article III). 

2003.4 Membership (Article IV). 

2003.5 Meetings (Article V). 

2003.6 Voting (Article VI.). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES