alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Pathways II Rule Phone & E-Mail Log

Includes substantive telephone conversations and e-mails between EPA personnel and non-government stakeholders following 

signature of the Pathways II Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on June 14, 2013 (separate memos on additional calls/emails have also 

been docketed individually).

Date EPA Personnel Stakeholder Purpose of Call/E-mail and Topics(s) Discussed

November 

2013 –

January

2014 

Lauren Rafelski 

(AAAS Fellow)

Jeffrey Fedenko, 

University of Florida

Several emails about Fedenko’s 2013 paper about grasses grown for 

bioenergy in Florida

1/6/2014 Lauren Rafelski 

(AAAS Fellow)

Jack Comstock, USDA Phone call to discuss different types of energy cane

1/24/2014 Lauren Rafelski 

(AAAS Fellow)

Anna Hale, USDA Email about methods of measuring the fiber content of energy cane

1/26/2014 Lauren Rafelski 

(AAAS Fellow)

Jack Comstock, USDA Email about methods of measuring the fiber content of energy cane

4/28/2014 Lauren Rafelski 

(AAAS Fellow)

Paul White, USDA Email about cellulosic content of energy cane

November 

2013 –

January

2014

David Babson 

(AAAS Fellow)

Cynthia Finley, 

National Association of 

Clean Water Agencies

Several emails and informal phone calls regarding data characterizing 

the solids content of municipal wastewater

January

2014 –

March 

2014

David Babson 

(AAAS Fellow)

John Willis, Brown and 

Caldwell

Several emails and informal phone calls regarding data characterizing 

the solids content and treatment of municipal wastewater at facilities 

producing biogas 
2
Exhibit 32.1



Universal Ice Blast, Inc.

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Universal Ice Blast, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/  RORY CLARKE



Rory Clarke

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 20, 2003









The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or a separate disclosure document.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1991 

FIRST SESSION { 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, June 18, 1991 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WALTER J. STEWART, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

1 EX. B., Two Related Protocols to the Convention for Feb 5 91 Reported favorably 

95-1 the Unification of Certain Rules Relating by Mr. Pell, Committee on 

to International Carriage by Air, as Foreign Relations, with a 

Amended (Montreal Aviation Protocols No. 3 resolution of advice and 

and 4). consent to ratification 

with provisos. (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 102-1 

together with minority 

views). 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 80 139 David Floyd Lambertson, of Kansas, a Career May 7, 91 Mr. Pell, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Committee on Foreign 

Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Relations, without printed 

Ambassador Extraordinary and report. 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of 

America to the Kingdom of Thailand. .. *S1gntf1es nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

July 17, 2000


Eric Chatham


Dear Eric:

I am very pleased to announce your new compensation package. The compensation
package will have an effective date of July 1, 2000 and will be as follows.

1.   Your base salary will be $225,000 annually with MBO Incentive Pay of
     $50,000 at target to bring your total compensation to $275,000 per year.

2.   You will be eligible to receive fifteen (15) months of your base salary
     plus MBO through the company's "Stay Put" Bonus plan, paid quarterly. This
     plan requires your continuous employment with the company until December
     31, 2000. Also, your 2nd Quarter 2000 "Stay Put" Bonus plan will be based
     on your new compensation package.

3.   In addition to your existing stock options, the company intends to grant
     you a stock option to purchase 175,000 shares of the company's common
     stock. This grant of stock option will be on a two-year vesting schedule.
     One quarter (1/4) of the option shares (43,750) will become exercisable
     after you have completed the next six months (January 1, 2000) of
     employment with the company, and, thereafter one twenty-fourth (1/24) of
     the option shares (7,291.66) will become exercisable following each month
     you remain employed by the company. The grant of the stock options will be
     subject to the other terms and provisions of the company's stock option
     plan and stock option agreement and the satisfaction of all federal and
     state securities laws.

Eric, you are a valuable team member of Beyond.com and are critical to the
future of our success. It is our hope that you recognize the value we place
upon you as reflected in your new compensation package.

Sincerely,


Ron Smith
President and CEO
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50350 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FLOYD DAVID REED, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(A-96-CR-19_

- - - - - - - - - - December 6, 1996 Before KING, JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Floyd Reed has appealed his sentence of 120 months confinement for a bank robbery which he committed by using a handgun. There is no merit to his contention that the upward departure, based on a criminal history category of VI rather than III, was excessive. See United States v. Ashburn , 38 F.3d 803, 807-10 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1969 (1995). Nor did the district court rely on an improper groundNo. 96-50350 - 2 - for departure. Reed argues that the district court sentenced him as a career offender based on a 1968 robbery conviction that was too remote to count toward his criminal history score. Contrary to Reed’s contention, the district court did not sentence him as a career offender. If Reed had been a career offender, his base offense level would have been 34 instead of 20, which would have resulted in a guideline range of 262 to 327 months. Reed was only sentenced to 120 months. Furthermore, the district court did not plainly err by not stating on the record why a sentence based on criminal history category IV or V was not appropriate.
See United States v. Lambert , 984 F.2d 658, 662-64 (5th Cir. 1993)(en banc).
AFFIRMED.
Order entered February 20 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV IN THE INTE REST OF S.C. AND K.C ., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District C ourt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 11 - 16417



### O RDER Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg This appeal is one of multiple proceedings filed in relation to the underlying suit affecting the parent - child relationsh ip (“SAPCR”) and pending in this Court . See 05 - 18 - 00629 - CV, 05 - 18 - 01368 - CV, and 05 - 19 - 00006 - CV. In each of these proceedings, relator complains, at least in part, of orders enforcing a fee provision in the parties’ divorce decree. On the Court’s own mot ion, we conclude these proceedings should be consolidated into one proceeding and decided together as one appeal. Accordingly, we ORDER cause number 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV CONSOLIDATED into cause number 05 - 1 8 - 0 0629 - CV. We DIRECT the Clerk of Court to remove all docum ents from cause number 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV and refile them in cause number 05 - 1 8 - 0 0629 - CV and to treat cause number 05 - 18 - 01125 - CV as a closed case. We ORDER that all future pleadings be filed in and bear only cause number 05 - 1 8 - 0 0629 - CV.The Court will issue a briefing schedule in cause number 05 - 18 - 00629 - CV in due course. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-40934 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUANA DE LA CRUZ-SANCHEZ CATALAN, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-1153-1
Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juana de la Cruz-Sanchez Catalan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De la Cruz-Sanchez Catalan has not f i l e d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 22, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40934 Document: 00511548330 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2011No. 10-40934

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-40934 Document: 00511548330 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2011
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Timmy Dean Scott , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00048

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

2027628 ). Memorandum Opin ion delivered by Chief Justice Stevens

, Justice

van Cleef and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the a ppellant, Timmy Dean Scott , has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

12:00 p.m., Monday, December 11, 2006.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 1, 2006.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 06-9565 Filed 12-1-06; 4:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 958 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify the requirements for the annual 

report on the trade agreements program and the national trade policy 

agenda to include an assessment of impacts on the national defense 

strategy and the national security strategy of the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify the requirements 

for the annual report on the trade agreements program 

and the national trade policy agenda to include an assessment of impacts on the national defense strategy 

and the national security strategy of the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Economic 

5 Diplomacy Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 958 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO ANNUAL REPORT ON TRADE 

2 AGREEMENTS PROGRAM AND NATIONAL 

3 TRADE POLICY AGENDA. 

4 Section 163(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

5 U.S.C. 2213(a)(3)(A)) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating clause (iv) as clause (v); 

7 (2) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

8 and 

9 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following: 

10 ‘‘(iv) how such objectives and priorities 

11 support and advance the objectives of— 

12 ‘‘(I) the national defense strategy 

13 under 113(g) of title 10, United States 

14 Code; and 

15 ‘‘(II) the national security strategy of 

16 the United States under section 108 of the 

17 National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 

18 3043); and’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Y. Tristan Kuo, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA BIOLOGIC PRODUCTS, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 20th day of October, 2010.

| | /s/ Y.
      Tristan Kuo
| | ------------------------
| | Y. Tristan Kuo          
| | Chief Financial Officer 
| | (Principal Financial and
| | Accounting Officer)     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Biologic Products, Inc. and will be retained by
China Biologic Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 231 (Friday, December 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 69578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

     Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Youth Interventions
    Date: December 11, 2006.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: David I. Sommers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive 
Blvd., Room 6154, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606. 301-443-7861. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3256415d5f5f574041725f535b5e1c5c5b5a1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1a5b2aeacaca4b3b281aca0a8adefafa8a9efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 27, 2006.
David Clary,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9481 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
120 STAT. 572 PUBLIC LAW 109–243—JULY 24, 2006

Public Law 109–243

109th Congress

An Act

To ensure that the right of an individual to display the flag of the United States

on residential property not be abridged.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom to Display the American

Flag Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Act—

(1) the term ‘‘flag of the United States’’ has the meaning

given the term ‘‘flag, standard, colors, or ensign’’ under section

3 of title 4, United States Code;

(2) the terms ‘‘condominium association’’ and ‘‘cooperative

association’’ have the meanings given such terms under section

604 of Public Law 96–399 (15 U.S.C. 3603);

(3) the term ‘‘residential real estate management association’’ has the meaning given such term under section 528 of

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 528); and

(4) the term ‘‘member’’—

(A) as used with respect to a condominium association,

means an owner of a condominium unit (as defined under

section 604 of Public Law 96–399 (15 U.S.C. 3603)) within

such association;

(B) as used with respect to a cooperative association,

means a cooperative unit owner (as defined under section

604 of Public Law 96–399 (15 U.S.C. 3603)) within such

association; and

(C) as used with respect to a residential real estate

management association, means an owner of a residential

property within a subdivision, development, or similar area

subject to any policy or restriction adopted by such association.

SEC. 3. RIGHT TO DISPLAY THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES.

A condominium association, cooperative association, or residential real estate management association may not adopt or enforce

any policy, or enter into any agreement, that would restrict or

prevent a member of the association from displaying the flag of

the United States on residential property within the association

with respect to which such member has a separate ownership

interest or a right to exclusive possession or use.

4 USC 5 note.

4 USC 5 note.

4 USC 5 note.

Freedom to

Display the

American Flag

Act of 2005.

July 24, 2006

[H.R. 42]

PUBLIC LAW 109–243—JULY 24, 2006 120 STAT. 573

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 42:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

June 27, considered and passed House.

July 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS.

Nothing in this Act shall be considered to permit any display

or use that is inconsistent with—

(1) any provision of chapter 1 of title 4, United States

Code, or any rule or custom pertaining to the proper display

or use of the flag of the United States (as established pursuant

to such chapter or any otherwise applicable provision of law);

or

(2) any reasonable restriction pertaining to the time, place,

or manner of displaying the flag of the United States necessary

to protect a substantial interest of the condominium association,

cooperative association, or residential real estate management

association.

Approved July 24, 2006.

4 USC 5 note.
Docket No. FAA
- 2016
- 4224 Dir ID 2015
- NM
- 170
- AD
§ 201.12 Public assistance audits. ( a ) Annually, or at such frequencies as are considered necessary and appropriate, the operations of the State agency are audited by representatives of the Audit Agency of the Department. Such audits are made to determine whether the State agency is being operated in a manner that: ( 1 ) Encourages prudent use of program funds, and
( 2 ) Provides a reasonable degree of assurance that funds are being properly expended, and for the purposes for which appropriated and provided for under the related Act and State plan, including State laws and regulations.
( b ) Reports of these audits are released by the Audit Agency simultaneously to program officials of the Department, and to the cognizant State officials. These audit reports relate the opinion of the Audit Agency on the practices reviewed and the allowability of costs audited at the State agency. Final determinations as to actions required on all matters reported are made by cognizant officials of the Department.