alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL Capital  Equipment
Fund VIII, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material  information  relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within the entity,  particularly during the period in which
     this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected or is  reasonably  likely to
     materially   affect  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.



Date:    November 11, 2004


/s/ Dean L. Cash
------------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Managing Member
#### State *v.*F. A. Allison et al.

October Term, 1899.

Present: Taet, 0. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Start, and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed April 2, 1900.

*State v. Massey*— The opinion in the preceding case of State v. Massey is ■ applicable to this case.

Bill oe oomplaint brought to the Court of Chancery for Caledonia County by the State’s Attorney for said County. All of the defendants answered and incorporated a demurrer into their respective answers. Before any orders were made in the case the defendants moved for a trial by jury upon the issues of fact. The cause was heard on said demurrers and on the motion for a trial by jury at the June Term, 1899, before *Thompson,*Chancellor, who denied said motion, overruled the demurrers and adjudged the bill of complaint sufficient. Thereupon the defendants moved to have the benefit of their demurrers reserved to them till final hearing, and to have their answers brought forward for hearing. This motion was denied and the bill taken as confessed as to all of the defendants. It was further adjudged and decreed that the common nuisance, set forth in the complaint, had been kept and maintained as charged in the bill and that the defendants and each of their servants, agents, lessees, tenants and assigns be perpetually enjoined from keeping and maintaining such nuisance and from suffering it to be maintained, and that the defendants pay costs. The defendants appealed.

The bill of complaint was filed May 25, 1899, and charged that certain rooms in a building in St. Johnsbury, owned by the defendant Bank and Trust Company, were kept and maintained as a liquor nuisance by its occupants, the defendants F. A. Allison and Campbell Davie. The bill of complaint in this case did not allege a conviction at law of the occupants, or of either of them prior to the bringing of the bill. It contained no allegation of knowledge on the part of the Citizen’s Bank and Trust Company.

*223The bill prayed for the injunction granted by the Chancellor.

*Leighton P. Slack,*State’s Attorney, and *Alexander Dun-nett*for the State.

*Bates, May c& Simonds*and *Harland B. Howe*for the defendants.

Munson, J.

It is not claimed but that a temporary injunction may issue against a tenant prior to conviction, and it has been held in *State*v. *Massey,*herein reported, that an injunction cannot issue against an owner not charged with knowledge. The case is therefore disposed of upon the opinion in the case named.

*Decree reversed pro forma as to defendants F. A. Allison and Campbell Drnie', reversed and demu/rrer sustained as to defendant Citizens Savings Bank and Trust Co., and the information as to it adjudged insufficient*/ *cause remanded.*
#### § 1150.44 Can a judgment I have obtained against the United States be used to satisfy a debt that I owe to the Endowment?

Collection by offset against a judgment obtained by a debtor against the United States will be accomplished in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3728.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 13 , 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00812- CV

SSV PROPERTIES C/O TARA PROPERTIES, Appellant

V. WENDELL KING, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1113771

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant filed its notice of appeal on September 13, 2018. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee , and no evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207.
On October 11, 2018, we issued an order stating we would dismiss the appeal if appellant did not pay the filing fee by October 21, 2018. The fee was no t paid. However, appellant paid for the clerk’s record, suggesting appellant intended to2

prosecute this appeal. For that reason, on November 13, 2018, we issued a second order directing appellant to pay the filing fee by November 26, 2018. We again cautioned we would dismiss the appeal if the filing fee was not paid. The fee has not been paid.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell.
§ 2522.940 What are the requirements for a program in which AmeriCorps members serve as tutors? A program in which members engage in tutoring for children must: ( a ) Articulate appropriate criteria for selecting and qualifying tutors, including the requirements in § 2522.910 of this subpart, and certify that selected tutors meet the requirements in § 2522.910.
( b ) Identify the strategies or tools it will use to assess student progress and measure student outcomes;
( c ) Certify that the tutoring curriculum and pre-service and in-service training content are high-quality and research-based, consistent with the instructional program of the local educational agency and with State academic content standards.
( d ) Include appropriate member supervision by individuals with expertise in tutoring; and
( e ) Provide specialized high-quality and research-based, member pre-service and in-service training consistent with the activities the member will perform.
[70 FR 39606, July 8, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 46506, Sept. 10, 2009]
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------

                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


            1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed
                  Certificates Trust 2006-13 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                  reports");

            2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                  and other information required to be provided under Form
                  10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                  the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                  review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                  statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                  Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                  periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                  obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                  respects; and

            5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

      Date: March 26, 2007


                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                  Steve Bailey
                  Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 518

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV

No. CV-14-258

ROBERT BOYD

APPELLANT

V.

MADISON COUNTY and AAC RISK

MANAGEMENT

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered October 1, 2014

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

COMMISSION

[NO. F900673]

AFFIRMED

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Judge

Robert Boyd appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation

Commission denying his claim for benefits in connection with illnesses he alleged resulted

from being exposed to mold at his workplace. He argues on appeal that the Commission’s

findings are not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm by issuing this

memorandum opinion. 

When the Commission denies benefits because the claimant has failed to meet his

burden of proof, the substantial-evidence standard of review requires that we affirm if the

Commission’s decision displays a substantial basis for the denial of relief. Wright v. Conway

Freight, 2014 Ark. App. 451, ___ S.W.3d ___. We view the evidence in the light most

favorable to the Commission's decision and affirm if it is supported by substantial evidence.

Id. Substantial evidence is relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate

to support a conclusion. Id. The issue is not whether we might have reached a different
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 518

result or whether the evidence would have supported a contrary finding; if reasonable minds

could reach the Commission’s conclusion, we must affirm its decision. Id. We defer to the

Commission’s findings of credibility and the resolution of conflicting evidence. Id. 

We may issue memorandum opinions in any or all of the following cases:

(a) Where the only substantial question involved is the sufficiency of the evidence;

(b) Where the opinion, or findings of fact and conclusions of law, of the trial court or

agency adequately explain the decision and we affirm;

(c) Where the trial court or agency does not abuse its discretion and that is the only

substantial issue involved; and

(d) Where the disposition of the appeal is clearly controlled by a prior holding of this

court or the Arkansas Supreme Court and we do not find that our holding should be

changed or that the case should be certified to the supreme court.

In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

This case falls within categories (a) and (b). The only substantial question on appeal is

whether the Commission’s opinion was supported by sufficient evidence. Our review of the

record reflects that it was. Further, the Commission’s opinion adequately and thoroughly

explained the decision reached. Accordingly, we affirm by memorandum opinion.

Affirmed.

HARRISON and GLOVER, JJ., agree. 

Taylor Law Partners, LLP, by: Timothy J. Myers, for appellant.

Michael E. Ryburn, for appellees.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 81 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 81

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
           Plants; Regulations for Interagency Cooperation''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2024

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Ricketts, Mrs. Capito, Mr. 
 Daines, Mr. Lee, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Risch, Mr. Rounds, Mrs. Britt, Mr. 
   Wicker, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Marshall, and Mr. Hoeven) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
           Plants; Regulations for Interagency Cooperation''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to 
``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for 
Interagency Cooperation'' (89 Fed. Reg. 24268 (April 5, 2024)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
```
Complete the following tables for each sampling pointPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionSample CollectionTime Temperature (°C)pH(S.U.)Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberInfluent SamplesCollected asGrabs(Yes or No)Mercury and CyanideSamples Collectedas Grabs(Yes or No)Influent to SBR andEffluent from SBRSamples Collected as24-Hour Composites(Yes or No)Tyvek Suitsused(Yes or No)Dust MasksUsed forMercury(Yes or No)Clean Hands/DirtyHands SamplingTechniques Used(Yes or No)Description of SampleCollection Technique (ifdifferent thaninstructions)Description of AbnormalConditions in FGD Systemor FGD WastewaterTreatment System that MayImpact ConcentrationsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Complete the following tables based on the plant operating characteristics during each set of samples collectedUnits OperatingDuring SamplingDayUnits Off-lineEntireSampling DaySCRs/SNCRsOperating onUnitsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Flow Rate (gpm) DurationSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Lime Usage(tons)Ferric ChlorideUsage(Liters/day)Organosulfide Usage(Liters/day)Polymer Usage(Liters/day)Acid Usage(Liters/day)ChemicalPrecipitationSystem EffluentFlow Rate (gpd)Dilution WaterAddition Priorto BiologicalTreatmentSystem(gpd)BiologicalTreatmentSystem EffluentFlow Rate (gpd)Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionScrubber Slurry Blowdown FlowRate Scrubber SlurryPercent SolidsPlant Operation During Sample CollectionPlant NameDate of SampleCollectionSampleCollectionNumberPlant Operation During Sample CollectionFGD Wastewater Treatment Operation During Sample CollectionPlant NameDate of SampleCollectionSampleCollectionNumberScrubber PurgeFlow Rate DuringInfluent SampleCollection(gpm)Percent HydrocloneOverflow RecycledBack to Scrubber

# Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Daily Power Generation (MW-hrs)

Plant Name Date Provide the daily power generation for each scrubbed unit starting two weeks prior to the first

set of samples through the last set of samples

# Chemical

Precipitation

Effluent Dil ut i on W ater

Addition Prior to

Biological

Treatment

System Biological

Treatment System

Effluent Plant Name Date FGD Wastewater Treatment System Flow Rates

(gpd) Provide the average flow rate in the FGD wastewater treatment system for each stream included in the

table starting two weeks prior to the first set of samples through the last set of samples
|              
|--------------
|CERTIFICATIONS



| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| | I, Bradley J. Moynes certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F for Black Diamond Brands Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|                    
|--------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008



| |                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Bradley J. Moynes
Bradley J. Moynes
Chief Executive Officer
§ 2540.300 What must be included in annual State reports to the Corporation? ( a ) *In general.* Each State receiving assistance under this title must prepare and submit, to the Corporation, an annual report concerning the use of assistance provided under this chapter and the status of the national and community service programs in the State that receive assistance under this chapter. A State's annual report must include information that demonstrates the State's compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
( b ) *Local grantees.* Each State may require local grantees that receive assistance under this chapter to supply such information to the State as is necessary to enable the State to complete the report required under paragraph (a) of this section, including a comparison of actual accomplishments with the goals established for the program, the number of participants in the program, the number of service hours generated, and the existence of any problems, delays or adverse conditions that have affected or will affect the attainment of program goals.
( c ) *Availability of report.* Reports submitted under paragraph (a) of this section must be made available to the public on request.