alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-KSB
BTHC VII, Inc.
File No.  0-52123


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of BTHC VII, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Timothy P. Halter,
Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: February 19, 2007                               By:      Timothy P. Halter
      -----------------                                  -----------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BTHC VII,  Inc. and will be retained by BTHC VII, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 158.608 Determining the amount of the penalty—mitigating circumstances. For every violation subject to a civil monetary penalty, if there are substantial or several mitigating circumstances, the aggregate amount of the penalty is set at an amount sufficiently below the maximum permitted by § 158.606 of this subpart to reflect that fact. As guidelines for taking into account the factors listed in § 158.607 of this subpart, HHS considers the following: ( a ) *Record of prior compliance.* It should be considered a mitigating circumstance if the responsible entity has done any of the following: ( 1 ) Before receipt of the notice issued under § 158.603 of this subpart, implemented and followed a compliance plan as described in § 158.605(c) of this subpart.
( 2 ) Had no previous complaints against it for noncompliance.
( b ) *Gravity of the violation(s).* It should be considered a mitigating circumstance if the responsible entity has done any of the following: ( 1 ) Made adjustments to its business practices to come into compliance with the requirements of this part so that the following occur: ( i ) Each enrollee adversely affected by the violation has been paid any amount of rebate owed so that, to the extent practicable, that enrollee is in the same position that he, she, or it would have been in had the violation not occurred.
( ii ) The rebate payments are completed in a timely manner.
( 2 ) Discovered areas of noncompliance without notice from HHS and voluntarily reported that noncompliance, provided that the responsible entity submits the following: ( i ) Documentation verifying that the rights and protections of all individuals adversely affected by the noncompliance have been restored; and
( ii ) A plan of correction to prevent future similar violations.
( 3 ) Demonstrated that the violation is an isolated occurrence.
( 4 ) Demonstrated that the financial and other impacts on affected individuals is negligible or nonexistent.
( 5 ) Demonstrated that the noncompliance is correctable and that a high percentage of the violations were corrected.
§ 156.941 Prehearing conferences. An ALJ may schedule one or more prehearing conferences (generally conducted by telephone) on the ALJ's own motion or at the request of either party for the purpose of any of the following: ( a ) Hearing argument on any outstanding discovery request.
( b ) Establishing a schedule for any supplements to the submissions required by § 156.937 because of information obtained through discovery.
( c ) Hearing argument on a motion.
( d ) Discussing whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record.
( e ) Establishing a schedule for an in-person, telephone, or video teleconference hearing, including setting deadlines for the submission of written direct testimony or for the written reports of experts.
( f ) Discussing whether the issues for a hearing can be simplified or narrowed.
( g ) Discussing potential settlement of the case.
( h ) Discussing any other procedural or substantive issues.
[78 FR 65101, Oct. 30, 2013, as amended at 86 FR 24293, May 5, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 77 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 77

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the fundamental right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2024

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Merkley, Ms. 
 Hirono, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the fundamental right to vote.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal 
voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public 
election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.
    ``Section 2. The fundamental right of citizens of the United States 
to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 
State or political subdivision within a State unless such denial or 
abridgment is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and 
is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 
governmental interest.
    ``Section 3. The portion of section 2 of the fourteenth article of 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States that consists of the 
phrase `or other crime,' is repealed.
    ``Section 4. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article and protect against any denial or abridgement of the 
fundamental right to vote by legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immunicon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|JAMES G. MURPHY        
|James G. Murphy        
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2005
#### ** **

#### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

#### ** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

                In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof HSW International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Henry N. Adorno, Vice Chairman, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge on the date hereof:

 
|   | (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,  the periods presented in the Report. |

 

Dated:             March 28,2008

 

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Henry Adorno |   |
|--------|--------|------------------|--------|
|   |   | Henry N. Adorno  |   |
|   |   | Vice Chairman    |   |

 

 

This certification isbeing furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Act, and shallnot be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theExchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11


The J.H. Heafner Company, Inc.
Computation of Earnings Per Share
(Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED                SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  -----------------------------    ------------------------------
                                                                  JUNE 30, 1999   JUNE 30, 1998    JUNE 30, 1999     JUNE 30, 1998
                                                                  -------------   -------------    -------------     -------------
<S>                                                               <C>             <C>              <C>               <C>
Average shares outstanding during the period                       5,163,414        4,310,631        5,125,541         3,995,816
Incremental shares under stock options and warrants computed
  under the treasury stock method using the average market         1,211,649        1,210,795        1,211,649         1,210,795
  price of issuer's stock during the period                       ----------      -----------      -----------       -----------

     Total shares for diluted EPS                                  6,375,063        5,521,426        6,337,189         5,206,610
                                                                  ==========      ===========       ==========       ===========

Income applicable to common shareholders:
  Loss from operations before extraordinary charge                                   (975,000)                       (1,438,000)




  Net income (loss)                                                  203,000       (3,173,000)        (990,000)       (3,636,000)


(Loss) income per basic common share:
  Loss from operations before extraordinary charge                $       --      $     (0.23)      $       --       $     (0.36)
                                                                  ==========      ===========       ==========       ===========

  Net income (loss)                                               $     0.04      $     (0.74)      $    (0.19)      $     (0.91)
                                                                  ==========      ===========       ==========       ===========

Income (loss) per diluted share:
Loss from operations before extraordinary charge                  $       --      $     (0.18)      $       --       $     (0.28)
                                                                  ==========      ===========       ==========       ===========

  Net income (loss)                                               $     0.03      $     (0.57)      $    (0.16)      $     (0.70)
                                                                  ==========      ===========       ==========       ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Roger P. DeschenesRoger P. DeschenesVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 10, 2011










This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
#### George H. King, Receiver, *v.*Alex Cochran.

October Term, 1399.

Present: Taft, O. J., Rowell, Tyler, Munson, Thompson, Start and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed January 29, 1900.

*Action at law by a receiver*— Mwrtey, *Receiver,*v. *Allen,*VI Yt. 377, determines the question in this case.

Action oe debt. Heard on demurrer to the declaration. Caledonia County, June Term, 1899, *Thompson,*J., presiding. Demurrer overruled *pro forma*and without hearing, and declaration adjudged sufficient. The defendant excepted.

The declaration alleged, among other things, the incorporation of the Washington Savings Bank of Seattle, under the laws of the State of W ashington, its subsequent insolvency, the due appointment of the plaintiff as its receiver by a court of that state, an order of said court directing the receiver to levy an assessment against the stockholders of said bank of seventy per cent of the par value of their stock, and the necessity and propriety of the levy.

It further set out that by a law of the state of Washington the stockholders of a bank there organized are individually responsible equally and ratably for its indebtedness to the amount of the par value of their stock in addition to the amount invested in their shares, and that the defendant was a stockholder of said bank subject to assessment under said order of court and said law.

*T. J. Deavitt*and *E. H. Demitt*for the plaintiff.

*Dunnett & Slack*for the defendant.

Taet, C. J.

The question determinative of this cause was decided in Murtey, Receiver, v. Allen, 71 Vt. 377, adversely to the plaintiff.

*Judgment reversed, demurrer sustained, declaration adjudged insufficient, and judgment for the defendant.*
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 950 

AN ACT 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to make a technical correction to the water rights 

settlement for the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 950 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Correction 

3 to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Res4 ervation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2023’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF ADJUSTED IN6 TEREST ON DEVELOPMENT FUND. 

7 Section 10807(b)(3) of the Omnibus Public Land 

8 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 

9 1409) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) ADJUSTED INTEREST PAYMENTS.— 

15 There is authorized to be appropriated to the 

16 Secretary for deposit into the Development 

17 Fund $5,124,902.12.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 18, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 950 

AN ACT 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management 

other purposes. Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, and for water rights settlement for the Shoshone-Paiute Act of 2009 to make a technical correction to the
`
Certification pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Wesley Brumbaugh, Chief Executive Officer of Timberjack Sporting Supplies, Inc. certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timberjack Sporting Supplies, Inc..;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.

[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003];

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:

January 16, 2007

By:

/s/ Wesley Brumbaugh

Wesley Brumbaugh, Chief Executive Officer
`
#### § 160.418 Penalty not exclusive.

Except as otherwise provided by 42 U.S.C. 1320d-5(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C. 299b-22(f)(3), a penalty imposed under this part is in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law.

[78 FR 5692, Jan. 25, 2013]
The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the District of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North

Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2520

___________

Clifford Scott Eaton, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Jan Zejdlik; John Plante; County of * District of North Dakota.

Grand Forks, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: April 6, 1998

 Filed: April 7, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Clifford Scott Eaton appeals from the district court&s adverse grant of summary 1

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Lieutenant John Plante and
-2-

Administrator Jan Zejdlik of the Grand Forks County Correctional Center, and the

County of Grand Forks. Upon review of the record, we conclude that judgment was

properly entered in favor of defendants. We reject Mr. Eaton&s claim that the

magistrate judge acted improperly, and conclude that neither the magistrate judge nor

the district court committed an abuse of discretion by not granting several of Mr.

Eaton&s motions. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 1:20-cv-01778-RCL   Document 24   Filed 02/11/21   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-01778-RCL   Document 24   Filed 02/11/21   Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

s0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140317 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140317 

 COA: 293690 

Cheboygan CC: 06-003551-FH 

KENNETH RICHARD HARRISON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).