alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices 67207 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

household. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 97 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

743. 

Estimated Annual Responses: 1,167. 

Dated: November 6, 2006. 

By direction of the Secretary. 

Denise McLamb, 

Program Analyst, Initiative Coordination 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E6–19602 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Joint Biomedical Laboratory Research 

and Development and Clinical Science 

Research and Development Services 

Scientific Merit Review Board; Notice 

of Meeting 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

gives notice under the Public Law 92–

463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) 

that the Joint Biomedical Laboratory 

Research and Development and Clinical 

Science Research and Development 

Services Scientific Merit Review Board 

will conduct a telephone conference call 

meeting from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. on 

December 4, 2006, at VA Central Office, 

1722 I Street, NW., Room 915, 

Washington, DC. 

The purpose of the Board is to 

provide advice on the scientific quality, 

budget, safety and mission relevance of 

investigator-initiated research proposals 

submitted for VA merit review 

consideration. 

This meeting will focus on the 

clinical research program and will be 

open to the public for approximately 

one hour at the start of the meeting to 

discuss the general status of the 

program. The remaining portion of the 

meeting will be closed to the public for 

the review, discussion, and evaluation 

of initial and renewal projects. 

The closed portion of the meeting 

involves discussion, examination, 

reference to staff and consultant 

critiques of research protocols. During 

this portion of the meeting, discussion 

and recommendations will deal with 

qualifications of personnel conducting 

the studies, the disclosure of which 

would constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of personal privacy, as well as 

research information, the premature 

disclosure of which could significantly 

frustrate implementation of proposed 

agency action regarding such research 

projects. 

As provided by subsection 10(d) of 

Public Law 92–463, as amended, closing 

a portion of this meeting is in 

accordance with 5 U.S.C., 552b(c)(6) 

and (9)(B). Those who plan to attend or 

would like to obtain a copy of the 

minutes of this meeting and roster of the 

members should contact LeRoy G. Frey, 

Ph.D., Chief, Program Review (121F), 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 

Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC, 20420 at (202) 254–0288. 

Dated: November 13, 2006. 

By Director of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 06–9280 Filed 11–12–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
EX-35 (b)
Thornburg 2006-4


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1.      A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and
including January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 and of the
Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
under my supervision.

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period. [If any material failure, specify such
failure and its nature and status.]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th
day of February 2007.


By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name: Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
Director of Loan Administration
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James R. Sulat, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ James R. SulatName:

James R. SulatTitle:

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial OfficerDate:

November 5, 2009
§ 1643.4 Applicability. ( a ) Nothing in § 1643.3 shall be interpreted to apply to: ( 1 ) The withholding or withdrawing of medical treatment or medical care;
( 2 ) The withholding or withdrawing of nutrition or hydration;
( 3 ) Abortion;
( 4 ) The use of items, goods, benefits, or services furnished for purposes relating to the alleviation of pain or discomfort even if they may increase the risk of death, unless they are furnished for the purpose of causing or assisting in causing death; or
( 5 ) The provision of factual information regarding applicable law on assisted suicide, euthanasia and mercy killing. Nor shall § 1643.3 be interpreted as limiting or interfering with the operation of any other statute or regulation governing the activities listed in this paragraph.
( b ) This part does not apply to activities funded with a recipient's non-LSC funds.
January 11, 2012

Mr. George Smith

President Flight Training International, Inc.
3401 Quebec Street, Suite 1950
Denver, CO 80207

Dear Mr. Smith:

By letter dated August 12, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Flight Training International, Inc. (FTI) for an exemption from § 142.53(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow FTI to use simulator-based line oriented flight training as an alternative means of complying with the line familiarization requirements of that section (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0836). By letter dated September 28, 2010, the FAA denied your petition (Exemption No. 10146, copy enclosed).

By letter dated November 24, 2010 you then petitioned the FAA on behalf of FTI for reconsideration of denied petition for exemption No. 10146. This letter reaffirms the FAA’s denial of September 28, 2010.

We apologize for our delay in providing this response, but this was a complicated issue. After additional review, the FAA has found that your request should be handled via a request for deviation in accordance with § 142.9. You will need to contact your Training Center Program Manager for this purpose.

No further action will be taken on this petition and Docket No. FAA-2010-0836 will be closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 63

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under 
                    the Fair Labor Standards Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2024

Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
Budd, Mrs. Capito, Ms. Collins, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Crapo, Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Hoeven, 
Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Lee, Mr. Marshall, Mr. 
 McConnell, Mr. Moran, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Risch, Mr. Romney, Mr. Scott of 
   Florida, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Thune, Mr. Tillis, Mr. 
Tuberville, and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following joint resolution; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under 
                    the Fair Labor Standards Act''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Employee or 
Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards 
Act'' (89 Fed. Reg. 1638 (January 10, 2024)), and such rule shall have 
no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001068052
<NAME> EPIC RESORTS LLC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      20,773,000
<SECURITIES>                                17,356,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,121,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,523,000
<INVENTORY>                                 71,583,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,159,000
<PP&E>                                      17,501,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,515,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,455,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,283,000
<BONDS>                                    130,287,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,885,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,455,000
<SALES>                                     15,651,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,601,000
<CGS>                                        3,127,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,455,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,650,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               735,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,799,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,038,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,038,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,038,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6 1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, February 25, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR EX RES REPORTED 

No No SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

-..; 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

-

~ 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 1 1-15 Susan G Esserman, of Maryland, to be Deputy Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

United States Trade Representative, With the Comm1ttee on Finance, Without 

rank of Ambassador, v1ce Jeffrey M. Lang, printed report 

resigned. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 2 1-18 Timothy F. Ge1thner, of New York, to be an Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, vice DaVId A. Committee on Finance, Without 

Lipton. printed report 

* 3 1-19 Gary Gensler, of Maryland, to be an Under Jan 22,99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice John D. Committee on Finance, without 

Hawke, Jr. printed report 

* 4 3-5 Edwin M. Truman, of Maryland, to be a Deputy Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr Roth, 

Under Secretary of the Treasury, v1ce Timothy Committee on Finance, Without 

F Geithner printed report 

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION 

* 5 1-9 MontieR. Deer, of Kansas, to be Chairman ofthe Feb 10, 99 Reported by Mr. 

National Indian Gammg Commission for the Campbell, Comm1ttee on Ind1an 

term of three years, VIce Tadd Johnson. Affairs, Without printed report. 

* Szgnzfies nomznee's commztment to respond to requests to appear and testzfy before any duly constztuted commzttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
**Exhibit 34.2****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**To the Board of Directors of Sallie Mae, Inc.:We have examined Sallie Mae, Inc.’s assertion, included in the accompanying Assertion on Compliancewith Regulation AB Criteria, that Sallie Mae, Inc. (the Corporation) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe SLM Reg AB Student Loan Platform (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31,2006, excluding (i) criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(3)(iii),1122 (d)(4)(x), 1122 (d)(4)(xi), 1122 (d)(4)(xii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xiii) which the Corporation hasconcluded are not applicable to the Platform and (ii) criteria 1122 (d)(2)(ii) which theCorporation has concluded is applicable to the Platform but is not the responsibility of theCorporation. Appendix A to the Corporation’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backedtransactions and securities defined by the Corporation as constituting the platform. TheCorporation is responsible for compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on the Corporation’s assertion based on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Corporation’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing ofselected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Corporation processedthose selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions andservicing activities performed by the Corporation during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Corporation during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Corporation’s compliance with the servicing criteria.In our opinion, the Corporation’s assertion that the Corporation complied with the aforementionednon-excluded servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the SLM Reg ABStudent Loan Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects./s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPMarch 23, 2007
Chris Mashiba <cmashil)a@cades.com> 

03/02/2012 07:20 PM 

Dear Tom: 

I have amended Djou For Hawaii's FEC disclosure reports for the unreported debts and cash balance 

adjustment per the FEC interim audit report. 

The specific amended reports are as follows: 

Amended Reports for Unreported Debts 

FEC-767279 - April 2010 Quarterly 

FEC-767339 - Pre-Special 2010 

FEC-768007 - July 2010 Quarterly 

FEC-768203 - Oct 2010 Quarterly 

FEC-768204 - Pre-General 2010 

Amended Reports for Cash Balance Adjustment 

FEC-768669 - April 2011 Quarterly 

I will be sending you a letter before March 8,2012, regarding additional information for consideration 

for the interim FEC audit report for Djou for Hawaii. 

Thanks, 

Chris Mashiba 

Djou for Hawaii 
Chris iVlashiba <cmashit>a@cades.com> 

03/08/2012 04:56 AM 

Subject: Additional Information to consider for Interim Audit Report - Djou for Hawaii 

Dear Tom/Philomena: 

The purpose of this email is to provide additional information for consideration for the interim 

audit report. 

1. Unrecorded Debts. The campaign continues to believe that a majority of the 

unrecorded debts were either for: (a) invoices that we did not receive until shortly before 

payment (e.g,. Edward Enterprise), or (b) invoices that were being disputed, in which 

case the amount of the debt actually due was unknown as of the respective FEC report 

dates. Please see attached emails for further details. 

2. 48 Hour reports. The remaining 48 hour reports did not disclose the reportable 

contributions as noted in the interim audit report. The reason why those contributions 

were not reported in the 48 hour reports was because overall contributions were being 

received at an enormous rate during the reporting periods and due to the shortage of 

manpower, some of those contributions were physically inputted into our FEC software a 

day or two after the dates they were received but the transaction date still used was the 

receipt date. I was timely checking the contribution receipts in the FEC software and 

uploading the 48 hour reports. However, on certain occasions, I was not able to report 

some of the contributions for the 48 hour report that were received on the respective 48 

hour report date because they were in fact entered into the software a day or two later 

by another volunteer staff member. This procedure has been corrected and should not 

happen again in this next election cycle. 

3. Cash Overstatement. We were having software problems in connection with the 

reconciliation of the FEC reports. This caused a delay in correcting the discrepancies. 

Further, the all-volunteer accounting team was very short staffed relative to the 

significant volume of transactions in 2010. However, we now have more help with the 

accounting so we do not foresee any similar problems being repeated for this next 

election cycle. 

Thank you for your continued consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Chris Mashiba 

Treasurer for Djou for Hawaii
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James R. Sulat, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ James R. SulatName:

James R. SulatTitle:

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 4, 2010
§ 1624.4 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) No qualified person with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination by any legal services program, directly or through any contractual or other arrangement.
( b ) A legal services program may not deny a qualified person with a disability the opportunity to participate in any of its programs or activities or to receive any of its services provided at a facility on the ground that the program operates a separate or different program, activity or facility that is specifically designed to serve persons with disabilities.
( c ) In determining the geographic site or location of a facility, a legal services program may not make selections that have the purpose or effect of excluding persons with disabilities from, denying them the benefits of, or otherwise subjecting them to discrimination under any program or activity of the legal services program.
( d ) ( 1 ) A legal services program that employs a total of fifteen or more persons, regardless of whether such persons are employed at one or more locations, shall provide, when necessary, appropriate auxiliary aids and/or other assistive technologies to persons with impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills, in order to afford such persons an equal opportunity to benefit from the legal services program's services. A legal services program is not required to maintain such aids at all times, provided they can be obtained on reasonable notice.
( 2 ) The Corporation may require legal services programs with fewer than fifteen employees to provide auxiliary aids and/or other assistive technologies where the provision of such aids would not significantly impair the ability of the legal services program to provide its services.
( e ) A legal services program shall take reasonable steps to ensure that communications with its applicants, employees, and beneficiaries are available to persons with impaired vision and hearing.
( f ) A legal services program may not deny persons with disabilities the opportunity to participate as members of or in the meetings or activities of any planning or advisory board or process established by or conducted by the legal services program, including but not limited to meetings and activities conducted in response to the requirements of 45 CFR part 1620.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adolescent LiteratureChildrens LiteratureElementary Secondary EducationInternetLanguage ArtsLesson PlansProfessional Development

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/std/PID/STDFact-PID.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/std/PID/STDFact-PID.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 2105.29 What must a submitter include in a detailed Exemption 4 objection statement?

If a submitter has any objections to disclosure, it should provide the Agency a detailed written statement that specifies all grounds for withholding the particular information under any exemption of the FOIA. In order to rely on Exemption 4 as basis for nondisclosure, the submitter must explain why the information constitutes a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is confidential.