alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 5303.

#### William Phillips *v.*The State.

Local Option Law, when adopted by the vote of the electors, does not become operative until the order of the commissioners court declaring the result of the election has been published for four successive weeks, and the sale of intoxicating liquors in the community to be affected is not, prior to such publication, a violation of the local option law. The order in this case was published in four successive issues of the newspaper of July 4, 11, 18 and 25, and the trial court charged in substance that the law became operative on the last named date. Held, erroneous. The law contemplates that the order shall be published for four full consecutive weeks, or twenty-eight days from the day of its first publication, and in refusing a special charge to that effect the trial court further erred.

Appeal from the County Court of Denton. Tried below before the Hon. S. M. Bradley, County Judge.

The conviction in this case was for a violation of the local option law, and the penalty imposed was a fine of two hundred dollars. The disposition of this case does not necessitate a statement of the facts proved on the trial.

*Smith & Bottorf,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

It is not a violation of the local option law to sell intoxicating liquors until after the order of the commissioners court declaring the result of the election adopting said law has been published for four successive weeks in the news, paper having the largest circulation in the county. (Penal Code> art. 378; Rev. Stats., arts. 3234-3239.) In this case the said order was published in four successive issues of a newspaper, the dates of said issues being July 4, 11, 18 and 25, 1885. The trial judge in effect instructed the jury that the publication of said order was completed July 25, 1885, the date of the last issue of the newspaper in which it was inserted, and that the law took effect and became operative on that day. This was error.

*305Opinion delivered April 20, 1887.

The law contemplates the publication of such order for four, full successive weeks, or twenty-eight days, dating from the day of its first publication. Such has been the construction placed upon analogous statutes, and such is, we think, the plain intention of this statute. (Hill v. Faison, 27 Texas, 428; Stephenson v. R. R. Co., 42 Texas, 162.) The local option law did not, therefore, become operative in Denton county until August 2, 1885. Hot only was this erroneous charge of the court excepted to, by defendant, but he requested a special instruction presenting the law upon the subject correctly, which was refused by the court, and to which action of the court the defendant also excepted.

Because of these errors the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and*remanded„

i

Í
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION**  **PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
      AMENDED**





Pursuant
      to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James Chu, Chairman of the Board of
      Directors and Chief Executive Officer of ViewSonic Corporation (the “Company”),
      and James A. Morlan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
      certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.  The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June
      30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic
      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of the Exchange Act; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company











Date:
                August 10, 2006/s/
                James Chu
            
            /s/
                James A. MorlanJames
                Chu
            
            James
                A. MorlanChairman
                of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
            
            Chief
                Financial Officer











This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
      as
      amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
      or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shiner International,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jian Fu,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
                    July
      23, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Jian FuName:
      Jian FuTitle:
      Chief Executive
Officer











This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1150.2 What is the Endowment's authority to issue these regulations?

The Endowment is issuing the regulations in this part under 31 U.S.C. 3711, 3716-3718, and 3720A. These sections reflect the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996. The Endowment is also issuing the regulations in this part in conformity with the Federal Claims Collection Standards, which prescribe standards for the handling of the Federal government's claims for money or property. The Endowment is further issuing the regulations in this part in conformity with 5 U.S.C. 5514 and the salary offset regulations published by the OPM at 5 CFR part 550, subpart K.
§ 162.1302 Standards for referral certification and authorization transaction. The Secretary adopts the following standards for the referral certification and authorization transaction: ( a ) For the period from October 16, 2003 through March 16, 2009: ( 1 ) *Retail pharmacy drug referral certification and authorization.* The NCPDP Telecommunication Standard Implementation Guide, Version 5, Release 1 (Version 5.1), September 1999, and equivalent NCPDP Batch Standard Batch Implementation Guide, Version 1, Release 1 (Version 1.1), January 2000, supporting Telecommunications Standard Implementation Guide, Version 5, Release 1 (Version 5.1) for the NCPDP Data Record in the Detail Data Record. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920).
( 2 ) *Dental, professional, and institutional referral certification and authorization.* The ASC X12N 278—Health Care Services Review—Request for Review and Response, Version 4010, May 2000, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X094 and Addenda to Health Care Services Review—Request for Review and Response, Version 4010, October 2002, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X094A1. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920).
( b ) For the period from March 17, 2009 through December 31, 2011 both— ( 1 ) The standards identified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) ( i ) *Retail pharmacy drugs.* The Telecommunication Standard Implementation Guide Version D, Release 0 (Version D.0), August 2007, and equivalent Batch Standard Implementation Guide, Version 1, Release 2 (Version 1.2), National Council for Prescription Drug Programs. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920.)
( ii ) *Dental, professional, and institutional request for review and response.* The ASC X12 Standards for Electronic Data Interchange Technical Report Type 3—Health Care Services Review—Request for Review and Response (278), May 2006, ASC X12N/005010X217, and Errata to Health Care Services Review-—Request for Review and Response (278), ASC X12 Standards for Electronic Data Interchange Technical Report Type 3, April 2008, ASC X12N/005010X217E1. (Incorporated by reference in § 162.920.)
( c ) For the period on and after January 1, 2012, the standards identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( d ) For the period on and after September 21, 2020, the Quantity Prescribed (460-ET) field, as set forth in the Telecommunication Standard Implementation Guide, Version D, Release 0 (Version D.0), August 2007 and equivalent Batch Standard Implementation Guide, Version 1, Release 2 (Version 1.2), National Council for Prescription Drug Programs, must be treated as required where the transmission meets both of the following: ( 1 ) Is for a Schedule II drug, as defined in 21 CFR 1308.12.
( 2 ) Uses the standard identified in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
[68 FR 8398, Feb. 20, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 3326, Jan. 16, 2009; 85 FR 4242, Jan. 24, 2020]
Exhibit
      32.2





**IMPLANT
      SCIENCES CORPORATION**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation (the
      "Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
      Diane
      J. Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








*/s/*Diane
                J. RyanDiane
                J. RyanChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                14, 2006
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Derick Nhekairo, * From the 441st District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR40252.

Vs. No. 11-13-00292-CR * May 30, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal 

is dismissed.
#### § 1643.5 Recipient policies and recordkeeping.

The recipient shall adopt written policies to guide its staff in complying with this part and shall maintain records sufficient to document the recipient's compliance with this part.
### Appendix F contains the following items (as separate files):

 Baltimore Area: Mobile Source Emissions Technical Support Docum ent February 2007  MOBILE6.2 Input Parameter Summary  MOBILE6.2 Sample Input Files  Rate of Further Progress Runs  Baltimore VM T and Emission Summary
Exhibit 4.30
 GENESIS LEASE LIMITED
CHANGE OF CONTROL PLAN
  Plan  Genesis Lease Limited Company Participant
 Board
    1. Definitions.
 1.1 Annual Base Salary
 1.2 Cause
 1.3 Committee




---



##### 



1.4 Corporate Change
 1.5 Disability
 1.6 Good Reason
 1.7 Group
 1.8 Permitted Holder
 2. Eligibility and Participation.
 2




---



##### 



3. Corporate Change Payment and Conditions.
 3.1 Corporate Change Payment.
 3.2 Release Requirement.
 3.3 Termination by the Company for Cause, by the Participant without Good Reason, or by
Reason of Death or Disability.
 3.4 Time of Payment.
 4. Administration.
 3




---



##### 



5. Other Agreements.
 6. Miscellaneous Provisions.
 6.1 Amendment; Termination.
 6.2 Construction.
 6.3 Notices.
 6.4 Withholding Tax.
 6.5 Binding Effect.
 4




---



##### 



6.6 Severability.
 6.7 No Restriction of Corporate Action.
 6.8 Continued Employment or Service.
 6.9 Governing Law.
  5




---



##### 



GENESIS LEASE LIMITEDBy
    /s/  John McMahonChairman andChief Executive Officer 6
#### § 2551.47 May the cost reimbursements and benefits of a Senior Companion be subject to any tax or charge, be treated as wages or compensation, or affect eligibility to receive assistance from other programs?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542, Aug. 30, 2024.

No. Senior Companion's cost reimbursements and benefits are not subject to any tax or charge or treated as wages or compensation for the purposes of unemployment insurance, worker's compensation, temporary disability, retirement, public assistance, or similar benefit payments or minimum wage laws. Cost reimbursements and benefits are not subject to garnishment and do not reduce or eliminate the level of, or eligibility for, assistance or services a Senior Companion may be receiving under any governmental program.

[83 FR 64646, Dec. 17, 2018]
```

[House Document 109-131]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

109th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 109-131

 
NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF 
                                COLOMBIA

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE 
 REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2105(a)(1)(A) OF THE 
 TRADE ACT OF 2002 (PUB. L. 107-210), PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2112(e)(1)

  September 6, 2006.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, August 24, 2006.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC. 
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of 
the Trade Act of 2002, (Public Law 107-210) (the ``Trade 
Act''), I am pleased to notify the Congress of my intention to 
enter into a free trade agreement with the Republic of 
Colombia.
    The United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement will 
generate export opportunities for U.S. farmers, ranchers, and 
companies, help create jobs in the United States, and help 
American consumers save money while offering them more choices. 
The Agreement will also benefit the people of Colombia by 
providing economic opportunity and by strengthening democracy.
    Consistent with the Trade Act, I am sending this 
notification at least 90 days in advance of signing the 
Agreement. My Administration looks forward to working with the 
Congress in developing appropriate legislation to approve and 
implement this Agreement.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.

                                  

```
#### §§ 1214.152-1214.159 [Reserved]
jJovenes Trabajadores!
Tu tienes derecho a un lugar de
trabajo seguro y saludable.

e Conoce tus derechos
en el lugar de trabajo.

e Habla con tu
empleador sobre
asuntos de seguridad
y salud en el trabajo.

e Mantente alerta y
trabaja con toda
seguridad.

e Obtén adiestramientos
sobre seguridad y salud.

e Visita la pagina
cibemética de
OSHA para Jovenes
Trabajadores en
www.osha.gov/teens

Administracién de
fi ) Seguridad y Salud
A Ocupacional
Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.
OSHA es una agencia federal que ayuda a garantizar la seguridad y salud

de todos los trabajadores, incluyendo la de los jovenes, en el lugar de trabajo.
OSHA provee informacion, recursos y guias a empleadores y empleados.

Para informacién adicional, habla con tu empleador o Hama al:
1-800-321-OSHA

www.osha.gov/teens
(TTY) 1-877-889-5627
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT OCTOBER 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                          95,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     97,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               368,483
<PP&E>                                         155,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 562,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,479,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                        32,481
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,949,242)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   562,388
<SALES>                                        609,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,138
<CGS>                                          402,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  982,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (794,069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (794,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (794,069)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESATE OF

JOSEPH ABRAHAM, JR. A/K/A

JOSEPH (SIB) ABRAHAM, JR.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00089-CV

Appeal from

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014-CPR02054)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–935

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2941, TO ESTABLISH THE LAS CIENEGAS NATIONAL CONSERVATION

AREA IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA

OCTOBER 4, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 610]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 610, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2941, to establish the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area in the State

of Arizona, under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources.

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the

bill. The rule makes in order as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed

in the Congressional Record and numbered 1, which shall be open

for amendment at any point. The rule waives all points of order

against the amendment in the nature of a substitute.

The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to

postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to reduce voting

time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a

fifteen minute vote. Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules. Finally, the rule provides for one motion

to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM JAMES MCFADDEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2166

[July 31, 2024]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Jeffrey Hendriks, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2022-CT002265A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), rev. 

denied, No. SC2022-1597, 2023 WL 3830251 (Fla. June 6, 2023), cert. 

denied No. 23-5173, 2024 WL 2709435 (U.S. May 28, 2024).

WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### George W. Smyth, Respondent, *v.*The Brooklyn Union Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants.

(Submitted December 14, 1908;

decided January 5, 1909.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 193 N. Y. 335.)
**Exhibit 10.3**FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT     RTI International Metal, Inc. has entered into an IndemnificationAgreement in the form attached with each of the individuals listed below,effective as of the date set forth opposite such individual’s name.   Nameand Title Date   Craig R. Andersson, Director May 6, 2005   Daniel I. Booker, Director May 6, 2005   Donald P. Fusilli, Jr., Director May 6, 2005   Ronald L. Gallatin, Director May 6, 2005   Charles C. Gedeon, Director May 6, 2005   Robert M. Hernandez, Director May 6, 2005   Edith E. Holiday, Director May 6, 2005   James A. Williams, Director August 7, 2005   Dawne S. Hickton, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director May 6, 2005   William T. Hull, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer November 9, 2005   Chad Whalen, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary February 19, 2007

 
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT