alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Mississippi Republican Party 

)

)

)

)

A17-15 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Laura E. Sinram, Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on March 24, 2021, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Proposed Final Audit Report on the 

Mississippi Republican Party, as recommended in the Memorandum from the 

Chief Compliance Officer and the Audit Division dated March 4, 2021, subject 

to the edit described in the email from Commissioner Weintraub’s Office on 

March 22, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. 

Commissioners Broussard, Cooksey, Dickerson, Trainor, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

March 24, 2021 

Date 

Attest: 

Digitally signed by Laura 

Sinram 

Laura Sinram 

Date: 2021.03.24

16:42:14 -04'00' 

Laura E. Sinram 

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the 

Commission
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of RAINEARTH INC. for the year ended April 30, 2010, I, Zhu,
YongFu, President and Chief Executive Officer of RainEarth Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year
ended April 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of RainEarth Inc..

|                         | /s/
      Zhu, YongFu                
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 12, 2010 | Zhu, YongFu                          
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),
that:  1.
  The
  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
  The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated:
  June 18, 2010/s/
  Dr. John CoustasDr. John
  CoustasPresident
  and Chief Executive Officer
#### Phenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn, Respondent, *v.*New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Phenix Ins. üo.*v. *M. T. G. & H. B. B. B. Go.,*132 App. Div. 113, affirmed.

(Argued October 20, 1909;

decided November 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 19, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by defendant negligently running a train over ¡fire hose stretched across its track.

*Charles A. Pooley*for appellant.

*A. C. Wade*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           33870
<SECURITIES>                                     23705
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15194
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1859
<INVENTORY>                                       5468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 79901
<PP&E>                                            7507
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   90829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        110476
<OTHER-SE>                                      (43297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     90829
<SALES>                                          29245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29245
<CGS>                                            12862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    44134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (27182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (27265)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (27265)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.17)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6379

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEE SHERMAN FLETCHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-94-81, CA-97-405-6)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Sherman Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lee Sherman Fletcher seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Fletcher, Nos. CR-94-81; CA-97-405-6

(M.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OR RULE 15D-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 of
The Meridian Resource Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Michael J. Mayell, President of the Company,
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



     1.   The Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 29, 2004



                                                     /s/ Michael J. Mayell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael J. Mayell
                                                     President


                                      -31-
#### James McKnight, Jr., an Infant, by L. James McKnight, His Guardian ad litem, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

*MoKnight*v. *Gity of New York,*121 App. Div. 924, affirmed.

(Submitted January 13, 1909;

decided January 29, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 23, 1907, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict atad affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Royal E. T. Riggs*of counsel), for appellant.

*J. Bronson Ker*and *M. P. O'Connor*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hisoock, JJ.
Sl()-l(M)329-()3 :

REGIONA L AIRPOR T Marc h 25 , 201 0 The Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docket DOT-OST-2010-t » Dea r Mr . Secretary : Than k you fo r th e opportunit

y t o expres s ou r

suppor t fo r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y an dpropose djoin t

busines s agreement

filedb y America

n Airline s an

dJapa n Airlines . Th e propose dallianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vital for oneworl dt o compet e effectively wit

h th e Sta r andSkyTea

malliance . Thi s increase dinterallianc e competitio n wil l in turn enhanc e th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y - first by solidifyin g U.S.-Japan Ope n Skies , the n b y servin g a s afoundatio n fo r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athoroug h review , w e encourag e th e Department o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t

woul denabl e thes e oneworl dallianc e airline s t o wor k closely together

t o delive r highl y competitiv e air

transportatio n services . Approval for AA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e apositiv e impac t

o n air trave l b y offerin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an dv^l l help t o ensure that customer s continu e t o benefi t fi^omhavin g thre e competitiv e ai r

alliance s t o choos e fi-om. W e urg e you t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely , Ralp h p . Hamilton , Chair Fayettevill e Regional Airport Commissio n P.O . Bo x 6421 8 (910^)433-116 0 bwhited@ci.fay.nc.u s

FAYETTEVILL E REGIONA L AIRPOR T P.O . 80X6421 8 FAYETTEVILLE . N O 2830 6 (910 ) 433-1619/FA X (910 ) 433-176 5

www.flyfay.coi n A n Equa l Opportunit y Employe r

# iSiiilifc- : 

# ili i Expres s Sl()-l()()329-()3 5 fi7D7 503 5 4l:.fi l jRKt f

1 Fir m •{!;;:'- ^ ••:'',••••• ' MEK.Ttw-tinjNlsntor . fl7D72D3S4b61. Gmidn' t ' Coiffpflffy ' '' ; M^yw * 'iM\'l : • I 

### ||870 7 203 5 468 1



# X C XSM A 2059 0 OC-tI S 

### DCf t

2 You r Intoim l Billin g Rtlwcnc o 3 T o v- i J 1 I I ( i ' " • •>"' * 23540 6 26n«W1 0 1B:4 1 LjJltiL!iiLi_

J ikim'MUsiiyi^Om-^t* ' Indrec t Sknutii N ip*A*rjinE H Do n MstktpnmlCfltiitl n donoonii B |o«b ? AJrfm u 

### I n 

## m 

# L 870 7 203 9 408 1 i w >« a i«#n/tBiN'«in<-tMr*4Ci''«ain i piu ) «< K 

# S T C O 

# P : 6CZ " 

# ssGJdx g r y :..-'-. j S ;.-, ) E.* 5

•is* *
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 16-26245 Doc 1 Filed 08/16/16 Entered 08/16/16 12:38:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40618 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. S T A C YJA M E S B E L L A M Y , al so kn ow n as Sta- F l o, D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- C R

- 164- 2
B ef ore G A R Z A , D E N N IS, an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney ap poi n t ed t o represent S t acy Jam es B el l am yha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif o rn ia , 386 U
. S
. 738 ( 196 7)
. B el l am y h as fi l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of t he r e c o r d, c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f, a nd Bel l am y ’ s r e s po ns e di s c l o s e s no no nf ri vol o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l
. A c c o r d in g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G RA N TE D , c o uns e l i s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he r r e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n , an d the A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 12, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 08-40618 Document: 00511027065 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
By: Chalin Askew

Treasurer for LatPAC

PO Box 27096

Pittsburgh, PA 15235

Tel: (346) 948-4561

cma@latpac.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Plaintiff Civ. No. 21-6095

v.

LATPAC

and

CHALIN M. ASKEW, in his official

capacity as treasurer of LATPAC DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO

Defendants MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

On February 3, 2022, plaintiff Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) filed a 

motion for default judgement to the Court, before before the Honorable Stewart D. Aaron.

The motion should be denied for several reasons. First, it is established and 

undisputed that the defendant violated 52 U.S.C. § 30104(a) and (b). The defendant has agreed to 

file all reports and disclose all information to the Commission that were previously required. The 

complexity of the reports and the timeline proposed of 30 days creates an undue burden.

Second, the defendant would be unable to pay the civil penalty amount of equal to or 

greater than $56,400. As of the submission of this motion, LATPAC’s current account has an 

available balance of $6,162 and a monthly average balance of $5,052.

Furthermore, in addition to being unable to pay the civil penalty, it is because of lack of 

funding that the defendant has been unable to hire the proper staff to complete the reports at the 

required deadlines. The defendant has only recently obtained volunteers to assist in completing 

the backlog.

Case 1:21-cv-06095-ALC-SDA Document 35 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 2
While a civil penalty may be proper to impose, it should be within the defendant’s means. 

As the defendant would be unable to pay the civil penalty, the parties would likely find 

themselves in similar litigation.

For these reasons, the defendant requests that the Court deny plaintiff’s motion for 

default judgment.

Dated: February 25, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Chalin Askew

CHALIN ASKEW

Treasurer for LatPAC

PO Box 27096

Pittsburgh, PA 15235

Tel: (346) 948-4561

cma@latpac.com

Case 1:21-cv-06095-ALC-SDA Document 35 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 2
[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Trivers, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-3945.] 

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. TRIVERS. 

[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Trivers, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-3945.] 

(Nos. 2009-1142 and 2012-0655—Submitted September 8, 2014—Decided 

September 15, 2014.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Oscar Trivers, Attorney Registration 

No. 0019588, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of October 13, 2009, 

wherein the court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3) suspended respondent from 

the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition 

and its order of November 27, 2012, wherein the court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 

V(6)(B)(3) suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two 

years with one year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially 

complied with those orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent is 

placed on probation for a period of one year in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9) 

and consistent with the opinion rendered herein on November 27, 2012. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9), on or 

before 30 days from the date of this order, relator shall file with the clerk of this 

court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor. It is 

further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall 

file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the 

probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, 

respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. 

V(9). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated 

until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in 

compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all 

other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the 

Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a 

report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, 

and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated. 

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 

as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 

publication. 

____________________ 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Arobell Seelye et al., Respondents, *v.*John B. Keeffe et al., as Assessors of the Village of Glens Falls, Appellants.

*People ex rel. Seelye*v. *Keefe,*119 App. Div. 713, affirmed.

(Argued December 13, 1907;

decided January 7, 1908.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 21,1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the defendants to reduce an assessment made against relators for the purposes of taxation.

*jDemiel J. Finn*for appellants.

*Edward AL. Angelí*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.
#### § 2525.420 For what purposes may a transferred award be used?

A transferred award may be used by the Designated Recipient to repay qualified student loans or to pay current educational expenses at an institution of higher education, as described in § 2525.210.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Card USA, Inc.., (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lyle J. Mortensen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               |  |                            
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|ADVANCED GROWING SYSTEMS, INC.
|                               | 
|By:                            |  | /s/ Lyle J. Mortensen      
|                               |  | Lyle J. Mortensen          
|                               |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                               |  | January 15, 2008
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 814 

To allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate Romania as a 

program country under the visa waiver program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2023 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate 

Romania as a program country under the visa waiver 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Romania Visa Waiver 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that the Government of 

8 Romania should— 

9 (1) undertake all steps necessary to prepare Ro10 mania for participation in the visa waiver program 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 814 IS

1 under section 217 of the Immigration and Nation2 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187) by developing a strategy 

3 to meet all criteria for the program; and 

4 (2) continue to advance robust efforts to elimi5 nate trafficking in persons, including by prioritizing 

6 the recommendations outlined in the report of the 

7 Department of State entitled ‘‘Trafficking in Per8 sons Report’’ issued in July 2022. 

9 SEC. 3. ELIGIBILITY OF ROMANIA FOR VISA WAIVER PRO10 GRAM. 

11 Notwithstanding any provision of section 217 of the 

12 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187), the 

13 Secretary of Homeland Security may designate Romania 

14 as a program country under the visa waiver program es15 tablished by that section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS