alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10670

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ADRIAN GOMEZ-UREABA, also known as Gerardo Gomez-Uribe, also known 

as Angel Uribe,

Defendant-Appellant

Consolidated with Case No. 15-10870

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v. 

SILVANO GARCIA-IBARRA,

 Defendant - Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-60-1

USDC No. 6:15-CR-9-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 10, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10670 Document: 00514676100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2018
No. 15-10670

c/w No. 15-10870

2

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and CLEMENT and SOUTHWICK, Circuit 

Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:*

Adrian Gomez-Ureaba pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United 

States and received a within-guidelines sentence of 34 months in prison and a 

one-year term of supervised release. Silvano Garcia-Ibarra likewise pleaded 

guilty to illegal reentry, and he received a within-guidelines sentence of 

18 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Each 

appellant was sentenced in accordance with a determination that his prior 

Texas conviction for evading arrest with a motor vehicle amounted to an 

aggravated felony under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2014), which incorporates 

the definition of crime of violence found in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). We rejected their 

challenges to their sentences and affirmed. United States v. Gomez-Ureaba, 

686 F. App’x 271 (5th Cir. 2017). 

The Supreme Court granted their petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated 

our judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Sessions v. 

Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018), which held that § 16(b) is unconstitutionally 

vague. However, we then held that § 16(b) remains validly incorporated into 

the advisory Guidelines for definitional purposes. United States v. Godoy, 

890 F.3d 531, 540 (5th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the appellants’ sentences are 

still valid. However, Gomez-Ureaba’s prior conviction does not constitute an 

aggravated felony warranting judgment under § 1326(b)(2). Accordingly, 

Gomez-Ureaba’s judgment is MODIFIED to reflect that he was convicted and 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 15-10670 Document: 00514676100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/10/2018
No. 15-10670

c/w No. 15-10870

3

sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), and the judgment as modified is 

AFFIRMED. Garcia-Ibarra’s judgment is likewise AFFIRMED. Because 

Gomez-Ureaba’s release date is imminent, the mandate shall issue forthwith.

 Case: 15-10670 Document: 00514676100 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/10/2018
§ 1321.21 Withdrawal of area agency designation. ( a ) In carrying out section 305 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3025), the State agency shall withdraw the area agency designation whenever it, after reasonable notice and opportunity for a hearing, finds that: ( 1 ) An area agency does not meet the requirements of this part;
( 2 ) An area plan or plan amendment is not approved;
( 3 ) There is substantial failure in the provisions or administration of an approved area plan to comply with any provision of the Act, regulations and other guidance as set forth by the Assistant Secretary for Aging, terms and conditions of Federal grant awards under the Act, or policies and procedures established and published by the State agency on aging;
( 4 ) Activities of the area agency are inconsistent with the statutory mission prescribed in the Act;
( 5 ) The State agency changes one or more planning and service area designations; or
( 6 ) The area agency voluntarily requests the State agency withdraw its designation.
( b ) If a State agency withdraws an area agency's designation under this section it shall: ( 1 ) Provide a plan for the continuity of area agency functions and services in the affected planning and service area;
( 2 ) Submit a State plan amendment as set forth in § 1321.31(b) or State plan as set forth in § 1321.33; and
( 3 ) Designate a new area agency in the planning and service area in a timely manner.
( c ) If necessary to ensure continuity of services in a planning and service area, the State agency may, for a period of up to 180 days after its final decision to withdraw designation of an area agency: ( 1 ) Perform the responsibilities of the area agency; or
( 2 ) Assign the responsibilities of the area agency to another agency in the planning and service area.
( d ) The Assistant Secretary for Aging may extend the 180-day period if a State agency: ( 1 ) Notifies the Assistant Secretary for Aging in writing of its action under this section;
( 2 ) Requests an extension; and
( 3 ) Demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Assistant Secretary for Aging a need for the extension. Need for the extension may include the State agency's reasonable but unsuccessful attempts to procure an applicant to serve as the area agency.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 25 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 25

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of H.R. 2872, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall amend the title so as to read: ``Making further 
continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2024, and for other purposes.''.

            Passed the Senate January 18, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 25

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2872.
```
January 20, 2016

Mr. Thomas Haun

VP of Strategy and Globalization

PrecisionHawk

9001 Glenwood Avenue

Suite 100

Raleigh, NC 27617

- 8779

Dear Mr. Haun :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ 61

. 113 (a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your January 7, 2016 , exemption request on behalf of Precisi onHawk into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 16

- 0363 ), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a leve l of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, ple ase visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process yo ur request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen an d

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
§ 1610.6 Exceptions for public defender programs and criminal or related cases. The following restrictions do not apply to: (1) A recipient's or subrecipient's separately funded public defender program or project; or (2) Criminal or related cases accepted by a recipient or subrecipient pursuant to a court appointment. ( a ) Criminal proceedings—45 CFR part 1613;
( b ) Actions challenging criminal convictions—45 CFR part 1615;
( c ) Aliens—45 CFR part 1626;
( d ) Prisoner litigation—45 CFR part 1637;
980.56006
§ 1322.21 Client eligibility for participation. ( a ) An individual must have attained the minimum age determined by the Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee as specified in their approved application, to be eligible to participate in services under the Act, unless the Act otherwise provides an explicit exception. Exceptions are limited to the following specific services: ( 1 ) Nutrition services: ( i ) Services shall be available to spouses of any age of older Native Americans;
( ii ) Services may be available to: ( A ) A person with a disability who lives with an adult, age 60 or older, or who resides in a housing facility that is primarily occupied by older adults at which congregate meals are served; and
( B ) A volunteer during meal hours.
( 2 ) Family caregiver support services for: ( i ) Adults caring for older Native Americans or individuals of any age with Alzheimer's or related disorder;
( ii ) Older relative caregivers who are caring for children and are not the biological or adoptive parent of the child, where older relative caregivers shall no longer be eligible for services under this part when the child reaches 18 years of age; or
( iii ) Older relative caregivers who are caring for individuals age 18 to 59 with disabilities, and who may be of any relationship, including the biological or adoptive parent.
( 3 ) Services such as information and assistance and public education, where recipients of information may not be older Native Americans, but the information is targeted to those who are older Native Americans and/or benefits those who are older Native Americans.
( b ) A Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee may develop further eligibility requirements for implementation of services for older Native Americans and family caregivers, consistent with the Act and all applicable Federal requirements. Such requirements may include: ( 1 ) Assessment of functional and support needs;
( 2 ) Geographic boundaries;
( 3 ) Limitations on number of persons that may be served;
( 4 ) Limitations on number of units of service that may be provided;
( 5 ) Limitations due to availability of staff/volunteers;
( 6 ) Limitations to avoid duplication of services;
( 7 ) Specification of settings where services shall or may be provided;
( 8 ) Whether to serve Native Americans who have Tribal or Native Hawaiian membership other than those who are specified in the Tribal organization's or Hawaiian Native grantee's approved application; and
( 9 ) Whether to serve older individuals or family caregivers who are non-Native Americans but live within the approved service area and are considered members of the community by the Tribal organization.
§ 211.7 Transfer and release of eligible person. ( a ) *Transfer and release to relative.* If at the time of arrival from a foreign country or any time during temporary or continuing care and treatment the Administrator finds that the best interests of the eligible person will be served thereby, and a relative, having been fully informed of his condition, agrees in writing to assume responsibility for his care and treatment, the Administrator shall transfer and release him to such relative. In determining whether his best interest will be served by such transfer and release, due weight shall be given to the relationship of the individuals involved, the financial ability of the relative to provide for such person, and the accessibility to necessary medical facilities.
( b ) *Transfer and release to appropriate State authorities, or agency of the United States.* If appropriate arrangements cannot be accomplished under paragraph (a) of this section, and if no other agency of the United States is responsible for the care and treatment of the eligible person, the Administrator shall endeavor to arrange with the appropriate State mental health authorities of the eligible person's State of residence or legal domicile, if any, for the assumption of responsibility for the care and treatment of the eligible person by such authorities and shall, upon the making of such arrangements in writing, transfer and release him to such authorities. If any other agency of the United States is responsible for the care and treatment of the eligible person, the Administrator shall make arrangements for his transfer and release to that agency.
#### § 1621.3 Complaints by applicants about denial of legal assistance.

A recipient shall establish a simple procedure for review of complaints by applicants about decisions to deny legal assistance to the applicant. The procedure shall, at a minimum, provide: A practical method for the recipient to provide applicants with adequate notice of the complaint procedures and how to make a complaint; and an opportunity for applicants to confer with the Executive Director or the Executive Director's designee, and, to the extent practical, with a representative of the governing body. The procedure shall be designed to foster effective communications between the recipient and complaining applicants.
#### § 1801.44 Allowance for room and board.

The cost allowed for a Scholar's room and board is the amount the institution reports to the Foundation as the average cost of room and board for the Scholar's institution, given the type of housing the Scholar occupies.
§ 156.927 Form and service of submissions. ( a ) Every submission filed with the ALJ must be filed electronically and include: ( 1 ) A caption on the first page, setting forth the title of the case, the docket number (if known), and a description of the submission (such as “Motion for Discovery”).
( 2 ) The signatory's name, address, and telephone number.
( 3 ) A signed certificate of service, specifying each address to which a copy of the submission is sent, the date on which it is sent, and the method of service.
( b ) A party filing a submission with the ALJ must, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such submission on the opposing party. An intervenor filing a submission with the ALJ must, at the time of filing, serve a copy of the submission on all parties. If a party is represented by an attorney, service must be made on the attorney. An electronically filed submission is considered served on all parties using the electronic filing system.
[78 FR 65101, Oct. 30, 2013, as amended at 86 FR 24293, May 5, 2021]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 21, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 21, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A1191. IN RE MICHAEL A. EDDINGS .
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On February 01, 2019, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than February 11, 2019. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 1/22/97 TENTH CIRCUIT

LARRY D. MAYNARD,

Petitioner-Appellant,
v. BOBBY BOONE, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-5153 (Dist. N. Dist. of Oklahoma) (D.C. No. 95-CV-952-B)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
BeforeANDERSON , LOGAN, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
This matter is before the court on Petitioner LarryD. Maynard’s application for a certificate of appealability to appeal the di strict court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have reviewed the district court’s order, Petitioner’s application for a certi ficate of appealability, and the record before us. For the reasons set forth in th e district court’s order of June13, 1996, we conclude that Petitioner has failed to make “a substantial showing of

a the denial of a constitutional right.” See Antiterrorist and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, tit. 1, § § 102-03, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996) (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)). Accord ingly, we DENY Petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS the appeal. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6,1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, June 22, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
- CALENDAR 

No 

I 

Ex RES 

No 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT 

BY 

I 

I 

I 

I 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

- CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* 15 22 Gary S. Guzy, ofthe District of Columbia, to be Mar 17, 99 Reported by Mr. 

an Assistant Administrator of the Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice Environment and Public Works, 

Jonathan Z. Cannon, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 35 3-8 Diane Edith Watson, of California, to be Apr 14,99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of without printed report. 

America to the Federal States of Micronesia. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

* 59 1-5 Kenneth M. Bresnahan, ofVirginia, to be Chief Apr 30, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Financial Officer, Department of Labor, vice Jeffords, Committee on Health, 

Edmundo A. Gonzales, resigned. Education, Labor, and Pensions, 

without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

* 70 4-4 Carolyn L. Huntoon, ofVirginia, to be an Mar 25, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Assistant Secretary of Energy (Environmental Murkowski, Committee on 

Management), vice Alan L. Aim, resigned. Energy and Nat ural Resources, 

without printed report. 

May 10, 99 Senate Committee on 

Armed Services discharged. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 71 108 George T. Frampton, Jr., of the District of May 12, 99 Reported by Mr. 

Columbia, to be a Member of the Council on Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Quality, vice Kathleen A. Environment and Public Works, 

McGinty, resigned. without printed report. 

* 75 18 John T. Spotila, of New Jersey, to be May 20, 99 Reported by Mr. 

I Administrator of the Office of Information and Thompson, Committee on 

! Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Governmental Mfairs, without 

J 

Budget, vice Sally Katzen. printed report. 

i 

' 

i 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY6,1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Thursday, April29, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex.REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

- CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No Doc No SUBJECT BY 

I 

I 

1, 

I 

I 

I 

J 

I 

I 

I 

I 

i 

1 

I 

I 

I 

I 

! 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

! 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

! 

\ 

___ . _ _j __ 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* 15 22 Gary S. Guzy, ofthe District of Columbia, to be Mar 17, 99 Reported by Mr. 

an Assistant Administrator of the Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice Environment and Public Works, 

Jonathan Z. Cannon, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENTOFSTATE 

* 18 3-9 Kent M. Wiedemann, of California, a Career Mar 23,99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador without printed report. 

Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the 

United States of America to the Kingdom of 

Cambodia. 

* 35 3-8 Diane Edith Watson, of California, to be Apr 14, 99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of without printed report. 

America to the Federal States of Micronesia. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 44 23 David C. Williams, of Maryland, to be Inspector Jan 22, 99 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

General for Tax Administration, Department Committee on Finance, without 

of the Treasury. (New Position) printed report. 

Apr 27, 99 Senate Committee on 

Governmental Affairs discharged. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-954]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast and Willamette Province Advisory Committee 
will meet in Corvallis, OR, February 22, 2006. The theme of the meeting 
is Introduction/Overview and Business Planning. The agenda includes: NW 
Forest Plan, BLM RMP Presentation, and Public Comment.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 22, 2006, beginning at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the LaSells Stewart Center, 100 
LaSells Stewart Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541-750-7075, or write to Siuslaw 
National Forest Supervisor, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, OR 97339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Council 
Discussion is limited to Forest Service/BLM staff and Council Members. 
Lunch will be on your won. A public input session will be at 11:30 for 
fifteen minutes. The meeting is expected to adjourn around 4 p.m.

    Dated: January 27, 2006.
Mary Zuschlag,
Supervisory Wildlife Biologist.
[FR Doc. 06-954 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```