alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-20-00546-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

ASHLEY TAMEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 319th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant Ashley Tamez filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order imposing 

sanctions and continuing or modifying her terms of probation. Represented by counsel, 

she has now filed a motion to dismiss her appeal on grounds that there is “no basis to 

appeal [because] the appeal was for [an] order that was not final and appealable.” She 
2

requests that we dismiss her appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P .42.2(a) (allowing appellate 

courts to dismiss criminal appeals upon the appellant’s motion before the appellate court’s 

decision when the attorney and appellant both sign a written motion to dismiss). Her 

motion to dismiss is not opposed by the State of Texas. We have not issued an opinion 

in this case and the motion to withdraw meets the requirements of the appellate rules 

insofar as it is signed by both appellant and her counsel. See id.

Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, we grant appellant’s motion 

to dismiss and we dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s 

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed on the

11th day of March, 2021.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A117 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A117

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE THREE - PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS, CHAPTER I: THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY, SECTION II: THE COUNCIL, ARTICLE 117 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 117

THE COUNCIL SHALL MEET WHEN CONVENED BY ITS PRESIDENT ON HIS OWN INITIATIVE OR AT THE REQUEST OF ONE OF ITS MEMBERS OR OF THE COMMISSION .
#### § 2518.100 What is the purpose of a Service-Learning Clearinghouse?

The Corporation will provide financial assistance, from funds appropriated to carry out the activities listed under parts 2531 through 2534 of this chapter, to public or private nonprofit organizations that have extensive experience with service-learning, including use of adult volunteers to foster service-learning, to establish a clearinghouse, which will carry out activities, either directly or by arrangement with another such organization, with respect to information about service-learning.

[59 FR 13792, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 51409, Aug. 20, 2010]
p080039.en2.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 08-0039

Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 7/17/2008

ENGINEER: Austin \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt:

Respirator:

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL:

CRSS (11/05/2007):

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 

VP: 

MW: 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
p080039.en2.txt

Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use:

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (11/06/2007):

Migration to groundwater: Slow due to biodegradation

PBT rating: P1B1T2

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, Fish

ingestion, 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 8 ppb), 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim: 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
p080039.en2.txt

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 08-0039

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

 

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. 

Output 2: 

from:

basis: 

 

Conservative: 

 

to: 

from:

basis: 

 

RELEASE TOTAL

 kg/yr - 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
p080039.en2.txt

Inhalation:

Dermal:

Exposure to at concentration

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
Case 16-27007 Doc 5 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:36:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 16-27007 Doc 5 Filed 08/23/16 Entered 08/23/16 11:36:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 171.403 TEFCA manner exception—When will an actor's practice of limiting the manner in which it fulfills a request to access, exchange, or use electronic health information to only via TEFCA not be considered information blocking? An actor's practice of limiting the manner in which it fulfills a request for access, exchange, or use of electronic health information to only via TEFCA will not be considered information blocking when the practice follows the conditions specified in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. ( a ) *Mutually part of TEFCA.* The actor and requestor are both part of TEFCA.
( b ) *Requestor capability.* The requestor is capable of such access, exchange, or use of the requested electronic health information from the actor via TEFCA.
( c ) *Limitation.* The request for access, exchange, or use of EHI is not via the standards adopted in 45 CFR 170.215, including version(s) of those standards approved pursuant to 45 CFR 170.405(b)(8).
( d ) *Fees and licensing.* ( 1 ) Any fees charged by the actor in relation to fulfilling the request are required to satisfy the exception in § 171.302; and
( 2 ) Any license of interoperability elements granted by the actor in relation to fulfilling the request is required to satisfy the exception in § 171.303.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         (4,846)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,813,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    108,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,921,988
<PP&E>                                         430,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,805,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          477,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       233,916
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,560,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,805,657
<SALES>                                         53,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,054
<CGS>                                           22,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,603,544
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,572,129)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,572,129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,572,129)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________

_________________ 

## 1 (Slip Opin i o n) 

## Cite as: 56 1 U
. S. ____ (2010) Per Curia m NOTIC E : Th is op i n ionis su bjec t to f o rma lrevi si onbef o r e pu blicat ioninth e p r eli m in ary p r in t of th e U n it edS t at es R e p o rts . R e ad ers ar e r e qu es ted to n o tif yth e R e p o r t e rof D e c i s i on s , Su p r em e C o u r t of th e U n ited St at es , Wa s h

ington, D. C. 2054 3, of any typ o gra p hical or other f o rmal err o rs , in or der th atc o rr ect i on s m a y b e mad eb e f o r e th ep r e lim in aryp r in t go es t o p r es s . 

# SUPREME CO URT O F THE UNI TED STATES No. 08–1 19 6 

# BRU CE W E YHRAU C H , PE TITIONE R v. UN ITE D STAT ES ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL S FOR THE NINT H CIRCUIT [Ju n e 24, 2010 ] 

# P ER 

# C UR I AM 

# . The judgm e nt is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Cou rt of Appea l s for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in ligh tof Skilling v. United Sta t es , ante , p. ___.
Exhibit 31(ii)


                                CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


            1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage
                  Pass-Through Trust 2006-HYB5 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                  reports");

            2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                  and other information required to be provided under Form
                  10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                  the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                  review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                  statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                  Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                  periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                  obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                  respects; and

            5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., PHH
            Mortgage Corporation, National City Mortgage Co. and Aurora Loan
            Services LLC.

      Date: March 26, 2007


                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                  Steve Bailey
                  Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,833
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,701
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 389,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,599,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          631,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       234,566
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,399,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,599,158
<SALES>                                         25,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,439
<CGS>                                          132,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               335,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (443,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (443,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (443,454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### People *ex rel.*Miller v. Comes *et al.,*referees.

*Highways*— *laying out through dooryard.*

After highway commissioners laid out a road through the lands of M., without his consent, M. extended his dooryard so as to embrace a portion of the land included in the road. The yard was of sufficient size without including that part taken for the road. *Held,*that the road was not laid out in violation of the statute forbidding the laying out of a road through “ any buildings * * * or any yards or inclosures, necessary to the use or enjoyment thereof without the consent of the owner.” (1 R. S. 514, § 57.) *Lansing*v. *Oaswell,*4 Paige, 523.

Certiorari to review the proceedings of referees appointed by the county judge of Madison county, affirming the order of commissioners of highways laying out a highway. The proceedings were instituted upon the relation of Henry Miller against James E. Comes, and others, the referees in question.

*B. F. Chapman,*for relator.

*M. J. Shoecraft,*for respondents.

Miller, P. J.

The only point of importance passed upon in the opinion is stated in the head-note, and a publication of the opinion at length does not seem necessary.

*Proceedings affirmed.*
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


18
U.S.C. Section 1350











I,
Christine D. Watts, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer
of Sadhana Equity Investment, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
to my knowledge that:




1.  the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





Date:  April
15, 2010








By:/s/ Christine D.
Watts


Christine
D. Watts


Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal Executive and Accounting
Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 46 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.46
                                     Agreed to December 19, 2024        

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of S. 4367, an Act to provide for improvements 
to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the 
conservation and development of water and related resources, and for 
other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
corrections:
        (1) In paragraph (2) of section 203(d) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(d)) (as added by section 
    1109(a)(3)(C)), strike ``maximum Federal cost'' and insert 
    ``Federal share of the cost''.
        (2) In section 204(c)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act 
    of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232(c)(1)) (as amended by section 1110(a)(1)), 
    strike ``United States funds'' and insert ``United States''.
        (3) In section 1142(3), strike ``in paragraph (4) and inserting 
    the following'' and insert ``by striking paragraph (4) and 
    inserting the following''.
        (4) In section 1203(a)(1), strike ``food'' and insert 
    ``flood''.
        (5) In paragraph (2) of section 1113(d) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4232; 110 Stat. 3719; 136 Stat. 
    3781) (as added by section 1355(1)(B))--
            (A) in the paragraph heading, strike ``Reconnaissance 
        study'' and insert ``Pre-design planning costs''; and
            (B) strike ``a reconnaissance study carried out by the 
        Secretary'' and insert ``pre-design planning costs''.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
S. J. Res. 11 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating 

to ‘‘Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and 

Vehicle Standards’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Control of Air Pollution From 

New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards’’ 

(88 Fed. Reg. 4296 (January 24, 2023)), and such rule shall have 

no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 1803.4 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The Foundation shall, within one year of the effective date of this part, evaluate, with the assistance of interested persons, including individuals with handicaps or organizations representing individuals with handicaps, its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the Foundation shall proceed to make the necessary modification.
( b ) The Foundation shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (a) of this section, maintain on file and make available for public inspection— ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
§ 1321.63 Area agency advisory council. ( a ) *Functions of council.* The area agency shall establish an advisory council. The council shall carry out advisory functions which further the area agency's mission of developing and coordinating community-based systems of services for all older individuals and family and older relative caregivers specific to each planning and service area. The council shall advise the agency relative to: ( 1 ) Developing and administering the area plan;
( 2 ) Ensuring the plan is available to older individuals, family caregivers, service providers, and the general public;
( 3 ) Conducting public hearings;
( 4 ) Representing the interests of older individuals and family caregivers; and
( 5 ) Reviewing and commenting on community policies, programs and actions which affect older individuals and family caregivers with the intent of assuring maximum coordination and responsiveness to older individuals and family caregivers.
( b ) *Composition of council.* The council shall include individuals and representatives of community organizations from or serving the planning and service area who will help to enhance the leadership role of the area agency in developing community-based systems of services targeting those in greatest economic need and greatest social need. The advisory council shall be made up of: ( 1 ) More than 50 percent older individuals, including minority individuals who are participants or who are eligible to participate in programs under this part, with efforts to include individuals identified as in greatest economic need and individuals identified as in greatest social need in § 1321.65(b)(2);
( 2 ) Representatives of older individuals;
( 3 ) Family caregivers, which may include older relative caregivers;
( 4 ) Representatives of health care provider organizations, including providers of veterans' health care (if appropriate);
( 5 ) Representatives of service providers, which may include legal assistance, nutrition, evidence-based disease prevention and health promotion, caregiver, long-term care ombudsman, and other service providers;
( 6 ) Persons with leadership experience in the private and voluntary sectors;
( 7 ) Local elected officials;
( 8 ) The general public; and
( 9 ) As available: ( i ) Representatives from Indian Tribes, Pueblos, or Tribal aging programs; and
( ii ) Older relative caregivers, including kin and grandparent caregivers of children or adults age 18 to 59 with a disability.
( c ) *Review by advisory council.* The area agency shall submit the area plan and amendments for review and comment to the advisory council before it is transmitted to the State agency for approval.
( d ) *Conflicts of interest.* The advisory council shall not operate as a board of directors for the area agency. Individuals may not serve on both the advisory council and the board of directors for the same entity.
Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00634-CV

———————————

IN RE STEVE HEBERT, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Steve Hebert, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to 

set aside the trial court’s order denying his “Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens.”

1

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

 

1 The underlying case is Charles D. Snider, Jr., Trustee of the SF Revocable Living 

Trust I v. Steve Hebert, cause number 2017-44445, pending in the 190th District 

Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Debra Ibarra Mayfield presiding.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 170 appear at 80 FR 62755, Oct. 16, 2015.

#### §§ 170.503-170.504 [Reserved]