alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of Exterra Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon McDougall,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.




                                                    /S/ GORDON C. MCDOUGALL
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Gordon C. McDougall
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 29th, 2007
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION


302
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT









I, Shu
Heng Wang, certify that:





(1) I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Rock Resources,
Inc.;





(2) Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4) The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) * for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)
*;





(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter


(the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;
and





(5) The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.







Gold
      Rock Resources, Inc.Date: July 28,
      2008
            By:
            /s/Shu Heng
    WangShu
      Heng WangPresident,
      CEO
#### § 1705.6 Request for correction or amendment to the record.

If a person wishes a change to be made in the record, he or she should follow the procedures for making changes which are included in the instructions accompanying the certification form by which the information was obtained. Copies of these instructions will be mailed to any delegate/alternate upon request.
370 P.2d 798

#### In the Matter of Ludmilla ANGLETON, by her Attorney-in-Fact, T. H. Eberle, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hugh R. ANGLETON, Respondent.

No. 8900.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 23, 1962.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1962.

Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, for appellant.

Langroise, Clark & Sullivan, Boise, for respondent.

KNUDSON, Justice.

This cause having been consolidated with Case No. 8899 for trial the issues on this appeal are disposed of by the opinion of this Court this day filed in said case, ante, 184, 370 P.2d 788. The order quashing and vacating the warrant issued herein is affirmed.

No costs allowed.

SMITH, C. J., and TAYLOR, Mc-QUADE and McFADDEN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), I, Hector Brush, certify that:





1.
The Annual Report of WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 19, 2010





/s/ Hector Brush


Hector Brush


Treasurer


(principal financial officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc., and will be retained byWaferGen Bio-systems, Inc.,  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 155.240 Payment of premiums. ( a ) *Payment by individuals.* The Exchange must allow a qualified individual to pay any applicable premium owed by such individual directly to the QHP issuer.
( b ) *Payment by tribes, tribal organizations, and urban Indian organizations.* The Exchange may permit Indian tribes, tribal organizations and urban Indian organizations to pay aggregated QHP premiums on behalf of qualified individuals, including aggregated payment, subject to terms and conditions determined by the Exchange.
( c ) *Payment facilitation.* The Exchange may establish a process to facilitate through electronic means the collection and payment of premiums to QHP issuers.
( d ) *Required standards.* In conducting an electronic transaction with a QHP issuer that involves the payment of premiums or an electronic funds transfer, the Exchange must comply with the privacy and security standards adopted in accordance with § 155.260 and use the standards and operating rules referenced in § 155.270.
( e ) *Premium calculation.* The Exchange may establish one or more standard processes for premium calculation. ( 1 ) For a Federally-facilitated Exchange, the premium for coverage lasting less than one month must equal the product of— ( i ) The premium for one month of coverage divided by the number of days in the month; and
( ii ) The number of days for which coverage is being provided in the month described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[77 FR 18444, Mar. 27, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 30346, May 27, 2014]
§ 1351.15 What costs are supportable under a Runaway and Homeless Youth Program grant? ( a ) For all grant programs, costs that can be supported include, but are not limited to, staff training and core services such as outreach, intake, case management, data collection, temporary shelter, transitional living arrangements, referral services, counseling services, and aftercare services. Costs for acquisition and renovation of existing structures may not normally exceed 15 percent of the grant award. HHS may waive this limitation upon written request under special circumstances based on demonstrated need.
( b ) For grants that support research, evaluation, and service projects; a national communications system to assist runaway and homeless youth in communicating with service providers; and for technical assistance and training grants; costs that can be supported include those enumerated above as well as services such as data collection and analysis, telecommunications services, and preparation and publication of materials in support of the purposes of such grants.
[81 FR 93060, Dec. 20, 2016]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00815-CR Thomas Jackson Wilson, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR5178, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES III, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The appeal is dismissed.

Mack Kidd, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Patterson Dismissed Filed: August 29, 2003 Do Not Publish
#### § 2540.310 Must programs that receive Corporation assistance establish standards of conduct?

Yes. Programs that receive assistance under this title must establish and stringently enforce standards of conduct at the program site to promote proper moral and disciplinary conditions.
§ 705.7 Distribution. ( a ) Library staff acting under the general authority of the Librarian of Congress may distribute a reproduction of a transmission program or a compilation of transmission programs made under this part, by loan to a researcher, provided that the researcher indicates the particular segments of the news broadcasts or compilations that he or she wishes to review, on the basis of an index or other finding aid prepared by the Librarian; and for deposit in a library or archives which meets the requirements of section 108(a) of title 17 of the United States Code.
( b ) Library staff will advise all recipients of such reproductions that such distribution shall be only for the purposes of research and not for further reproduction or performance, and that any use in excess of that permitted by the American Television and Radio Archives Act (section 170 of title 2 of the United States Code), title 17 of the United States Code, and this part may violate copyrights or other rights.
§ 2540.202 What eligibility criteria apply to an individual for whom a National Service Criminal History Check is required? An individual shall be ineligible to work or serve in a position specified in § 2540.201(a) if the individual— ( a ) Refuses to consent to a criminal history check described in § 2540.204;
( b ) Makes a false statement in connection with a criminal history check described in § 2540.204;
( c ) Is registered, or is required to be registered, on a state sex offender registry or the National Sex Offender Registry; or
( d ) Has been convicted of murder, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1111.
[86 FR 11147, Feb. 24, 2021]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 7, 2020

t1218 

# Order

Clerk August 7, 2020

159716

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 159716

COA: 346873

Marquette CC: 2018

- 056950

- AR

JAMES MORGAN ROSS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11 , 2019 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 1336.52 Appeals. ( a ) *Right to appeal.* Recipients whose financial assistance has been suspended or terminated, or whose non-competing continuation applications for refunding have been denied, may appeal such decisions using the procedures described in this section. Denial of an application for refunding means the refusal to fund a non-competing continuation application for a budget period within a previously approved project period.
( b ) *Suspension, termination, and denial of funding.* Procedures for and definitions of suspension and termination of financial assistance are published in 45 CFR 75.371 through 75.380. Appeals from a denial of refunding will be treated the same procedurally as appeals to termination of financial assistance. The term “denial of refunding” does not include policy decisions to eliminate one or more activities of an approved project. A decision not to fund an application at the end of the recipients's project period is not a “denial of refunding” and is not subject to appeal.
( c ) *Hearings.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall be given an initial written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the suspension or termination of financial assistance except in emergency situations, which occur when Federal property is in imminent danger of dissipation, or when life, health, or safety is endangered. During this period of time, the recipient has the opportunity to show cause to ANA why such action should not be taken.
( 2 ) A recipient who has received final written notice of termination or denial of refunding, or whose financial assistance will be suspended for more than 30 days, or who has other appealable disputes with ANA as provided by 45 CFR part 16 may request review by the Departmental Grant Appeals Board under the provisions of 45 CFR part 16.
( 3 ) If a recipient appeals a suspension of more than 30 days which subsequently results in termination of financial assistance, both actions may be considered simultaneously by the Departmental Grant Appeals Board.
[48 FR 55821, Dec. 15, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 3022, Jan. 20, 2016]
§ 2516.600 How are funds for school-based service-learning programs distributed? ( a ) Of the amounts appropriated to carry out this part for any fiscal year, the Corporation will reserve not less than two percent and not more than three percent for grants to Indian Tribes and U.S. Territories to be allotted in accordance with their respective needs.
( b ) The Corporation will use the remainder of the funds appropriated as follows: ( 1 ) Allotments to States. ( i ) From 50 percent of the remainder, the Corporation will allot to each State an amount that bears the same ratio to 50 percent of the remainder as the number of school-age youth in the State bears to the total number of school-age youth of all States.
( ii ) From 50 percent of the remainder, the Corporation will allot to each State an amount that bears the same ratio to 50 percent of the remainder as the allocation to the State for the previous fiscal year under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 *et seq.*) bears to the allocations to all States.
( iii ) Notwithstanding other provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, for any fiscal year for which amounts appropriated for Part I of Subtitle B of Title I of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12521 *et seq.*) exceed $50,000,000, the minimum allotment to each State under this paragraph (b)(1) will be $75,000.
( 2 ) For the purpose of paragraph (b) of this section, “State” means one of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
( c ) If a State or Indian Tribe does not submit an application that meets the requirements for approval under this part, the Corporation (after making any grants to community-based entities for activities in nonparticipating States) may use its allotment for States and Indian Tribes with approved applications, as the Corporation determines appropriate.
[74 FR 46504, Sept. 10, 2009]
§ 153.530 Risk corridors data requirements. ( a ) *Premium data.* A QHP issuer must submit to HHS data on the premiums earned with respect to each QHP that the issuer offers in a manner specified by HHS.
( b ) *Allowable costs.* A QHP issuer must submit to HHS data on the allowable costs incurred with respect to the QHP issuer's non-grandfathered health plans in a market within a State in a manner specified by HHS. For purposes of this subpart, allowable costs must be — ( 1 ) Increased by any risk adjustment charges paid by the issuer for the non-grandfathered health plans under the risk adjustment program established under subpart D of this part.
( 2 ) Reduced by — ( i ) Any risk adjustment payments received by the issuer for the non-grandfathered health plans under the risk adjustment program established pursuant to subpart D of this part;
( ii ) Any reinsurance payments received by the issuer for the non-grandfathered health plans under the transitional reinsurance program established under subpart C of this part;
( iii ) A cost-sharing reduction amount equal to the amount of cost-sharing reductions for the benefit year as calculated under § 156.430(c) of this subchapter, to the extent not reimbursed to the provider furnishing the item or service.
( iv ) For the 2015 and 2016 benefit years, any difference between— ( A ) The sum of unpaid claims reserves and claims incurred but not reported, as set forth in §§ 158.103 and 158.140(a)(2) and (3) of this subchapter, that were reported on the MLR and Risk Corridors Annual Reporting Form for the year preceding the benefit year; and
( B ) The actual claims incurred during the year preceding the benefit year and paid between March 31 of the benefit year and March 31 of the year following the benefit year.
( c ) *Allowable administrative costs.* A QHP issuer must submit to HHS data on the allowable administrative costs incurred with respect to the QHP issuer's non-grandfathered health plans in a market within a State in a manner specified by HHS.
( d ) *Timeframes.* For each benefit year, a QHP issuer must submit all information required under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section by July 31 of the year following the benefit year.
( e ) *Requirement to submit enrollment data for risk corridors adjustment.* A health insurance issuer in the individual or small group market of a transitional State must submit, in a manner and timeframe specified by HHS, the following: ( 1 ) A count of its total enrollment in the individual market and small group market; and
( 2 ) A count of its total enrollment in individual market and small group market policies that meet the criteria for transitional policies outlined in the CMS letter dated November 14, 2013.
[77 FR 17248, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15531, Mar. 11, 2013; 78 FR 65094, Oct. 30, 2013; 79 FR 13836, Mar. 11, 2014; 79 FR 37662, July 2, 2014; 81 FR 12334, Mar. 8, 2016]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: 

Nazario Valencia

Debtor(s)

Case No. 16-27007

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Glenn Stearns, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the 

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

1) The case was filed on 08/23/2016.

2) The plan was confirmed on NA .

3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 on

NA .

4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the plan 

on NA .

5) The case was dismissed on 09/16/2016.

6) Number of months from filing to last payment: 0.

7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: NA .

9) Total value of assets exempted: NA .

10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without payment: $0.00.

11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank.

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-27007 Doc 15 Filed 11/17/16 Entered 11/17/16 14:02:05 Desc Page 1

 of 3
Receipts:

Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor $0.00

Less amount refunded to debtor $0.00

NET RECEIPTS: $0.00

Expenses of Administration:

Attorney’s Fees Paid Through the Plan $0.00

Court Costs $0.00

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0.00

Other $0.00

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0.00

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0.00

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Int.

Paid

Principal

Paid

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

Secured Payments:

Mortgage Ongoing

Mortgage Arrearage

Debt Secured by Vehicle

All Other Secured

TOTAL SECURED:

Priority Unsecured Payments:

Domestic Support Arrearage

Domestic Support Ongoing

All Other Priority

TOTAL PRIORITY:

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS:

Claim

Allowed

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Principal

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Interest

Paid

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-27007 Doc 15 Filed 11/17/16 Entered 11/17/16 14:02:05 Desc Page 2

 of 3
Disbursements:

Expenses of Administration $0.00

Disbursements to Creditors $0.00

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS : $0.00

12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, 

the estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all 

administrative matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee 

requests a final decree be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may 

be just and proper.

Dated: 11/17/2016

STATEMENT: This Unified Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork Reduction 

Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies.

By:/s/ Glenn Stearns

Trustee

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (9/1/2009)

Case 16-27007 Doc 15 Filed 11/17/16 Entered 11/17/16 14:02:05 Desc Page 3

 of 3
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 897 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make a permanent increase 

in the number of judges presiding over the United States Court of 

Appeals for Veterans Claims, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make a permanent 

increase in the number of judges presiding over the 

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expedite Veteran Ap5 peals Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 897 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT INCREASE IN NUMBER OF JUDGES 

2 PRESIDING OVER COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

3 VETERANS CLAIMS. 

4 Section 7253(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘seven’’ and inserting ‘‘nine’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 156.606 HHS audit authority.

The Secretary may audit a plan or program recognized as minimum essential coverage under § 156.604 at any time to ensure compliance with the requirements of § 156.604(a).