alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ron. Joe Beatg 

County Auditor 

Stephens County 

Breckenrldge, Texas 

Dear SFr: Opinion ~6. 0-6240 

Re: Is office of county commFssioner 

vacated because such commlssloner also accepts private emplogment? 

Your original opinion request and also your letter 

supplying additional Information have been received in this 

office. The question submitted by you is, in substance, as 

follows: 

Can county commissioner hold office and 

receive compensation from county while also being privately employed for servfces without the 

scope of his official duty on job requiring approximately eight hours of his time per day, and 

drawing a regular salary for such private employment? "In other words can he legally hold 

two jobs at the same time?' 

We believe the sole question raised by your communication is whether such county commissioner vacated hls office by 

reason of his employment in private business. There Is not 

presented thereby the question of simultaneous tenure of more 

than one "civ11 office of emolument" for the primary reason 

that there is only one "public office" involved. FOP the same 

reason, the question of "%ncompatibilitg of offices"is not 

presented. The other employment of such commissioner is of a 

private nature only and does not constitute holding "office". 

See "Public Officers", 34 Texas Zurisprudence. 

Under well settled principles of law, we must presume, 

In the absence of facts to the contrary, that the county commissioner In question is discharging the duties of the office 

of county commissioner in a lawful manner. 

Therefore, from the facts submitted, we belleve that 

the private employment of a county commissioner would not of 

itself constitute abandonment of his office so as to create a 
Hon. Joe Beaty, page 2 O-6240 

vacancy thereof. Our specific answer to your question, restricted to the facts stated and assumed, is in the affirmative. 

Trusting the foregoing fully answers your question we 

are 

, Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By s/Robert L. Lattimore, Jr. 

Robert L. Lattimore, Jr. 

Assistant 

RLL:rt:wc 

APPROW NOV 8, 1944 

s/Grover Sellers 

ATTORNFX GENWAL OF TEXAS 

Approve Opinion Committee By s/BWR Chairman
EXHIBIT
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Freedom6, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
        certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
        belief:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
                  March 5, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Virginia
                  K. SourlisVirginia
                  K. SourlisPrincipal
                  Executive Officer
                Principal
                  Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shiner International,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeffrey T.
Roney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:March
      25, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Jeffrey T. RoneyName:
      Jeffrey T. RoneyTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer











This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of R&R Acquisition X, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kirk
      M.
      Warshaw, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Kirk M. WarshawKirk
                M. Warshaw
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              August
                16, 2007
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dragon Acquisition Corporation. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |                                                            
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2009 |                                                            
|                     |                                                            
|                     |                                                            
|                     | /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle                                      
|                     | Joseph R. Rozelle                                          
|                     | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | OCMULGEE |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|----------|
JAME S L OBERSTA R Or » DI9TMCT, MINNESOT A 236 5 RAYBUR N HOUS E OFHC E BUILDIN C WASHINGTON , O C 2051&-230 8 (202)225-621 1 FAX : (202 ) 225-069 9 www.housa.gov/obersta r CHAIRMAN : COMMITTE E O N TRANSPORTATIO N AN D INFRASTRUCTUR E AT-LARG E WHI P 

# ConsreB B of

th elanite dState s lious t of lUpitBentatiot s IDashington , ©£20515-230 $ Septembe r

30,201 0 BRAINER D Crr yHAL L 50 1 LAURE L STREE T BRAINERD , M N 5640 1 (218)82&-440 0 CHISHOL M Cn yHAL L 31 6 LAK E STREE T CHISHOLM , M N 5671 9 (218)264-576 1 23 1 FEDERA L BUILDIN O DULUTH , M N 5580 2 (218)727-747 4 3862 5 14T H AVENU E SUIT E 300 B NORT H BRANCH , M N 5505 6 (651)277-123 4 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 SeventhStreet , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Secc^^J^Hood : I a mwritin g in suppor t

o f a n applicatio n b y th e St . Clou dRegiona l Aiqjor t fo r agran t unde r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program . Th e gran t woul db e use dt o suppor t direc t ai r servic e fro mSt . Clou dt o Chicago . Sinc e 2009 , whe n Mesab aAirline s discontinue dit s ai r servic e a t

St . Clou dairport , th e underserve dregio n ha s ha dlimite dcharte r servic e fromSu n Countr y Airlines . Lac k o f direc t servic e t o anothe r

hu b outsid e o f

Minnesot aha s resulte di n ai r traveler s fromth e St . Clou dare at o driv e t o th e Minneapolis-St . Pau l Internationa l airpor t t o fulfil l thei r

ai r trave l needs . Th e creatio n o f ne w ai r servic e route s t o Chicago , wit hapossibilit y t o expan delsewher e aroun dth e countr y i n th e future , woul dgreatl y impac t th e St . Clou dregio n an dbette r serv e th e need s o f

St . Clou dare a residents . I urg e th e ful l an dfai r

consideratio n o f

St . Clou dRegiona l Airport' s gran t applicatio n consisten t wit happlicabl e law , rule s an dregulations . Withbes t wishes . Sincerely , L . Oberstar , M.C . JLO/in b

PRINTC O O N RECYCLE D PAPE K
EXHIBIT
32.2




WAGERGEN
BIO-SYSTEMS, INC.


CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Amjad Huda, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.




This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




Date:
March 31,
2008






By:
            /s/  Amjad
      HudaAmjad
      HudaChief
      Financial Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Frederick A. Weismiller,  Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify:

         1.   The  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
              for the three  months  ended March 31,  2004 (the "Form  10-QSB"),
              fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
              applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and

         2.   The information  contained in the 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Frederick A. Weismiller
---------------------------
Frederick A. Weismiller
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    May 17, 2004
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 16 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of not more 

than 9 justices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. DAINES, Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. YOUNG, and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of not more than 9 justices. 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 16 IS 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 by the Congress: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Supreme Court of the United 

5 States shall be composed of not more than 9 justices. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to 

7 enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Filed: February 26, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2618 (CA-95-716-A) Louella F. Benson, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Kenneth Duvall, et al, Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed February 21, 1996, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 4 -- the decided date is corrected to read "February 21 , 1996." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Bert M. Montague Clerk2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2618 LOUELLA F. BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH DUVALL; SALLY DUVALL; JASON DUVALL; JAMES G. SMALLEY; J. HOWE BROWN, JR.; JANE M. ROUSH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-716-A) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Louella F. Benson, Appellant Pro Se. James Gerard Smalley, Fairfax, Virginia; Rita Marie Sampson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motions to dismiss and denying Appellant's motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Benson v. Duvall , No. CA-95-716-A (E.D. Va. July 18 & 28, 1995; Sept. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 156.815 Plan suppression. ( a ) *Suppression* means temporarily making a QHP certified to be offered through the Federally-facilitated Exchange unavailable for enrollment through the Federally-facilitated Exchange.
( b ) *Grounds for suppression.* A QHP may be suppressed as described in paragraph (a) of this section on one or more of the following grounds: ( 1 ) The QHP issuer notifies HHS of its intent to withdraw the QHP from a Federally-facilitated Exchange when one of the exceptions to guaranteed renewability of coverage related to discontinuing a particular product or discontinuing all coverage under § 147.106(c) or (d) of this subchapter applies;
( 2 ) Data submitted for the QHP is incomplete or inaccurate;
( 3 ) The QHP is in the process of being decertified as described in § 156.810(c) or (d), or the QHP issuer is appealing a completed decertification as described in subpart J of this part;
( 4 ) The QHP issuer offering the QHP is the subject of a pending, ongoing, or final State regulatory or enforcement action or determination that could affect the issuer's ability to enroll consumers or otherwise relates to the issuer offering QHPs in the Federally-facilitated Exchanges; or
( 5 ) One of the exceptions to guaranteed availability of coverage related to special rules for network plans or financial capacity limits under § 147.104(c) or (d) of this subchapter applies.
( c ) A multi-State plan as defined in § 155.1000(a) of this subchapter may be suppressed as described in paragraph (a) of this section if OPM notifies the Exchange that: ( 1 ) OPM has found a compliance violation within the multi-State plan, or
( 2 ) One of the grounds for suppression in paragraph (b) of this section exists for the multi-State plan.
[80 FR 10875, Feb. 27, 2015]
- 440 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

305 Nebraska Reports

REVEIZ v. EL-KASABY

Cite as 305 Neb. 440

Elena Reveiz, appellant, v. 

Bassel El-Kasaby, appellee.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed April 3, 2020. No. S-19-278.

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Affirmed.

Denise E. Frost, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for 

appellant.

Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, and, on brief, Stacy L. Morris and 

Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for 

appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The February 19, 2019, order of the Douglas County District 

Court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Affirmed.

Papik, J., not participating.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

06/26/2020 08:08 AM CDT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         666,831
<SECURITIES>                                   207,856
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,071,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,121,489
<PP&E>                                         140,883 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,476,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,572,266
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,444
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,902,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,476,010
<SALES>                                        3,097,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,344,769
<CGS>                                          2,074,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,074,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,270,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                   431,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            838,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   838,330
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.12

<FN>
<F1> net of depreciation
</FN>

</TABLE>
# EC Table 1

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 5/19/20.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEREMY JOHNSON and

JOHN SWALLOW,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-cv-00439-DB

PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT 

District Judge Dee Benson

Pursuant to this Court’s Memorandum Decision and Order (Apr. 6, 2018), ECF No. 120, 

Defendant John Swallow’s Motion for Partial Final Judgment, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

54(b):

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant John

Swallow’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Federal Election Commission’s cross motion 

for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Federal Election 

Commission is forthwith ENJOINED from enforcing regulation 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(1)(iii) and 

ORDERED to strike 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(1)(iii) from the Code of Federal Regulations and;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that dismissal of the 

Federal Election Commission’s claims against Defendant John Swallow are final and separable

from the remaining claims against Defendant Jeremy Johnson. The claims against Mr. Swallow 

Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 127 Filed 09/20/18 Page 1 of 2
2

were based on an amended complaint under legal theories that differ from the remaining claims 

before this Court; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that there is no just reason 

for delay of entry of partial final judgment as to the claims against Defendant John Swallow or 

vacatur of 11 C.F.R. § 110.4(b)(1)(iii); and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant John 

Swallow’s Motion for Partial Final Judgment is thereby GRANTED.

DATED this 20th day of , 2018.

Hon. Dee Benson

United States District Judge

September

Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB Document 127 Filed 09/20/18 Page 2 of 2