alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1356.82 Data collection requirements. ( a ) The State agency must collect applicable information as specified in section 1356.83 of this part on the reporting population defined in section 1356.81 of this part in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) For each youth in the served population, the State agency must collect information for the data elements specified in section 1356.83(b) and 1356.83(c) of this part on an ongoing basis, for as long as the youth receives services.
( 2 ) For each youth in the baseline population, the State agency must collect information for the data elements specified in section 1356.83(b) and 1356.83(d) of this part. The State agency must collect this information on a new baseline population every three years. ( i ) For each youth in foster care who turns age 17 in FFY 2011, the State agency must collect this information within 45 days following the youth's 17th birthday, but not before that birthday.
( ii ) Every third Federal fiscal year thereafter, the State agency must collect this information on each youth in foster care who turns age 17 during the year within 45 days following the youth's 17th birthday, but not before that birthday.
( iii ) The State agency must collect this information using the survey questions in appendix B of this part entitled “Information to collect from all youth surveyed for outcomes, whether in foster care or not.”
( 3 ) For each youth in the follow-up population, the State agency must collect information on the data elements specified in sections 1356.83(b) and 1356.83(e) of this part within the reporting period of the youth's 19th and 21st birthday. The State agency must collect the information using the appropriate survey questions in appendix B of this part, depending upon whether the youth is in foster care.
( b ) The State agency may select a sample of the 17-year-olds in the baseline population to follow over time consistent with the sampling requirements described in section 1356.84 of this part to satisfy the data collection requirements in paragraph (a)(3) of this section for the follow-up population. A State that samples must identify the youth at age 19 who participated in the outcomes data collection as part of the baseline population at age 17 who are not in the sample in accordance with 45 CFR 1356.83(e).
[73 FR 10365, Feb. 26, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

   Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of not 
                         more than 9 justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2023

 Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, 
 Mr. Daines, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Romney, Mr. 
  Braun, Mr. Young, and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following joint 
 resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of not 
                         more than 9 justices.

Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 
composed of not more than 9 justices.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
4828
      Loop
      Central Drive


Houston
      TX 77081


Telephone
      713-966-8966


Fax
      713-218-4595


www.littonloan.com


**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**





Ownit
      Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-5








The
      undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual Statement
      as
      to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above
      referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
      Servicer during such preceding calendar year (or such shorter period in the
      case
      of the first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been
      made
      under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
      review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement
      in
      all material respects for 2006, except as disclosed below:





*Reconciliations
      for Asset-Backed Securities Related Bank Account -
      1122(d)(2)(vii)(D)*





Our
      investor bank account reconciliations included certain reconciling items that
      were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification
      on
      eleven of sixty-three investor bank account reconciliations selected for
      testing. The sum of the reconciling items for those eleven reconciliations
      was
      $216,950.





*Adjustments
      to Interest Rates for Pool Assets With Variable Rates -
      1122(d)(4)(ix)*





Our
      testing of sixty-five adjustable rate mortgages revealed two instances where
      certain adjustable rate mortgages for which the interest rate reset in the
      servicing system did not agree to interest rates in the appropriate source
      index
      per the borrower’s note documents. These were the result of incorrect
      information transferring from the prior servicer. Additionally, the same
      sixty-five mortgages selected for testing included one instance where the
      adjustable rate mortgage payment change date in the servicing system did not
      agree to the loan documents.








Date:  February
      27, 2007








*/s/
      Elizabeth Folk*


__________________________________


Elizabeth
      Folk


Senior
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


Litton
      Loan Servicing LP








Inv
        497 -
        Servicer Compliance Statement
#### § 171.1100 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the information that will be posted on the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology's (ONC) public website about actors that have been determined by the HHS Office of Inspector General to have committed information blocking.
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:43 AM

To: 'Dave Brown'

Cc: Rios, Gerardo; Shane Young; Sloan, W illiam M.; Dave Dun; Christenson, Kara

Subject: RE: SPI Anderson - Change in primary contact - FYI

Dave,

Thanks for the update.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

Permits Office, Air Division

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Dave Brown [ mailto:DBrown@spi-ind.com ]

Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:48 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Rios, Gerardo; Shane Young; Sloan, William M.; Dave Dun; Christenson, Kara

Subject: SPI Anderson - Change in primary contact - FYI

Shaheerah

– We’re making a change in primary contact for SPI related to the Anderson PSD permit

– please use Shane

Young as the primary SPI contact moving forward. Below is Shane’s contact information

Shane Young

Facility Manager

Sierra Pacific Industries

– Anderson Division

19758 Riverside Avenue

PO Box 10939

Anderson, CA 96007

530

‐ 378

‐ 8350 ph

530

‐ 378

‐ 8360 fax

swyoung@spi

‐ ind.com

Thank you,

David C. Brown, PE

Environmental Affairs & Compliance Manager

Sierra Pacific Industries

19794 Riverside Avenue

Redding, CA 96049-6028

(530) 378-8179

(530) 378-8139 fax

(530) 391-7650 cell

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This communication and any accompanying or attached document(s) are confidential and privileged. The y are intended for the

sole use of the addressee(s). If you receive this communication in error, you are advised that any use, disclosure, copying, di stribution or taking any action in

reliance upon this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately telephone Si erra Pacific Industries at (530) 378-

8179, and delete this message without copying it. Thank you.
#### § 401.9 Evaluation criteria.

Commission consideration of a request to approve a memorial will include, but not be limited to, evaluation of following criteria:

| Criteria | Discussion |
| --- | --- |
| (a) How long has it been since the events to be honored took place? | Requests made during or immediately after an event are not generally subject to approval. The Commission will not approve a memorial until at least 10 years after the officially designated end of the event. It should be noted that this is the same period of time made applicable to the establishment of memorials in the District of Columbia and its environs by the Commemorative Works Act. |
| (b) How will the perpetual maintenance of the memorial be funded? | Available adequate funding or other specific arrangements addressing perpetual care are a prerequisite to any approval. |
| (c) Has the host nation consented? | Host nation approval is required. |
| (d) Is an overseas site appropriate for the proposed permanent memorial? | In many circumstances a memorial located within the United States will be more appropriate. |
| (e) Is the proposed memorial intended to honor an individual or small unit? | Memorials to elements smaller than a division or comparable unit or to an individual will not be approved unless the services of such unit or individual clearly were of such distinguished character as to warrant a separate memorial. |
| (f) Is the memorial historically accurate? | Representations should be supported by objective authorities. |
| (g) Is the proposed memorial intended to honor an organizational element of the American Armed Forces rather than soldiers from a geographical area of the United States? | As a general rule, memorials should be erected to organizations rather than to troops from a particular locality of the United States. |
| (h) Does the contribution of the element to be honored warrant a separate memorial? | The commemoration should normally be through a memorial that would have the affect of honoring all of the American Armed Forces personnel who participated rather than a select segment of the organizational participants. |
S. J. Res. 38 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating 

to ‘‘Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to ‘‘Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric 

Vehicle Chargers’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 10619 (February 21, 2023)), and 

such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-501.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

COMPACT OF FREE ASSOCIATION 

Labor 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the MARSHALL ISLANDS 

Signed at Majuro April 30, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MARSHALL ISLANDS 

 

 Compact of Free Association: Labor 

 Agreement signed at Majuro April 30, 2003; 

 Entered into force May 1, 2004.
**EXHIBIT 31. (1)**

CERTIFICATIONS

 I, Bradley J. Moynes certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F for Black Diamond Holdings Corporation; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 16, 2007

/s/ Bradley J. Moynes
**Exhibit 31.2**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Paul H.McDonough, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Paragraphomitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8392 and 33-49313;

c)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

**Date: February 28,2007**
|        |   | /s/ Paul H. McDonough   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Paul H. McDonough       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENEDJANUARY3,2001 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Wednesday, May 9, 2001 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
1 

RESOLUTIONS 

CALENDAR Ex. REs REPORTED 

No. No. SUBJECT BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED - No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 

-
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No No NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 43 246 Lincoln P. Bloomfield, Jr., ofVirginia, to be an Apr 26,2001 Reported by Mr. 

Assistant Secretary of State (Political-Military Helms, Committee on Foreign 

Affairs), vice Eric D. Newsom. Relations, without pnnted report. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

* 47 245 Victoria Clarke, of Maryland, to be an Assistant May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr 

Secretary of Defense, vice Kenneth H. Bacon. Warner, Committee on Armed 

Services, without printed report. 

* 49 263 William J. Haynes II, of Tennessee, to be General May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr 

Counsel of the Department of Defense, vice Warner, Committee on Armed 

Douglas A. Dworkin. Services, without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

* 58 167 David Aufhauser, of the District of Columbia, to May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

be General Counsel for the Department of the Grassley, Committee on Fmance, 

Treasury, vice Neal S. Wolin, resigned. without printed report. 

* 59 179 Kenneth W. Dam, of Illinois, to be Deputy May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Stuart E. Grassley, Committee on Fmance, 

Eizenstat, resigned. without pnnted report. 

* 60 198 Michele A. Davis, of Virginia, to be an Assistant May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Michelle Grassley, Committee on Finance, 

Andrews Smith, resigned. without printed report. 

* 61 238 John B. Taylor, of California, to be an Under May 1, 2001 Reported by Mr. 

Secretary of the Treasury, vice Timothy F. Grassley, Committee on Fmance, 

Geithner. without printed report. 

* &gmfies nommee's comm~tment to respond to requests to appear and test~fy before any duly const~tuted comm~ttee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
.**~·**. FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT INRE: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO REGULATION

III RULE 3.17- WOOD HEATING DEVICES

) ) ) ) ) ) _________________________

) RESOLUTION NO. 2009-09 WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code sections 40000, 40001, and 40702 authorize the Feather River Air Quality Management District to adopt this proposed rule and regulation; and WHEREAS, this Resolution, and the Regulation setforth herein, was adopted after proceedings held in accordance with provisions of chapters

6 and 6.5 of part3 of division 26 of the California Health and Safety Code (commencing with section 40700), and a duly noticed public hearing washeld on August 26, 2009 toconsider adoption of amendment

to Regulation III, Rule 3.17

-Wood Heating Devices; and WHEREAS, District staff has prepared

awritten analysis of the proposed amendment

to Regulation III, Rule 3.1 7 - Wood Heating Devices, pursuant
toHealth and Safety Code section 40727.2, and has maintained

arecord of the rulemaking proceeding pursuant toHealth and Safety Code section 40728; and WHEREAS, there is noindication
atthis time that amendment

to Regulation III, Rule 3.17 is written in such amannerthat the personsaffected by it could not easily understand
it; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment

to Regulation III, Rule 3.17 is in harmony with, and notin conflict with or contradictory
to, existing statutes, court decisions,

orState orFederal regulations and any duplication with existing State orFederal regulations

is necessary
or proper toexecutethe powersand duties of the Feather River Air Quality Management District; and WHEREAS, the proposed adoption of Regulation III, Rule 3.17 is nota project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuantto CEQA Guidelines sections 15378 because the action will notcause
adirect adverse physical change tothe environment

orcause
a reasonable foreseeable adverse physical change in the environment and that nofurther action is required under CEQA; and WHEREAS, the proposed adoption of Regulation III, Rule 3.17 will fulfill oneof the commitments made in regards toHealth and Safety Code 39614 (SB 656) for reduction of particulate matter;and WHEREAS, the District Board has made the required findings of authority, necessity, clarity, consistency, non-duplication, and reference;n ,_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
by the Board of Directors of the FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT that effective OCTOBER

5, 2009, the Board adopts the amendment

to Regulation III Rule 3.1 7-Wood Heating Devices toread in its entirety assetforth in Exhibit A tothis resolution, attached hereto and made part hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Feather River Air Quality Management District ata meeting onOctober
5, 2009, by the following vote: A YES: Director Niroletti, Gr:i.Eg:>, Ate, M:nbB., M..Iq:!r", J3:llarrl, &=lvli:lJ=, Ied:!rgrap1 ard Gill NOES: N::re ABSENT: N::re ABSTAIN: N::re ATTEST: CLERK OF THE DISTRICT BOARD APPROVED FOR LEGAL FORM District Counsel