49–006 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–636 

OREGON WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2006 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2006.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State 

of the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. POMBO, from the Committee on Resources, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 5079] 

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] 

The Committee on Resources, to whom was referred the bill 

(H.R. 5079) to provide for the modification of an amendatory repayment contract between the Secretary of the Interior and the North 

Unit Irrigation District, and for other purposes, having considered 

the same, report favorably thereon with amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. 

The amendments are as follows: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oregon Water Resources Management Act of 2006’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN DESCHUTES RIVER 

CONSERVANCY. 

Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 (division B of Public 

Law 104–208; 110 Stat. 3009–534) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘Deschutes River Basin Working Group’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Deschutes River Conservancy Working Group’’; 

(2) by amending the text of subsection (a)(1)(B) to read as follows: ‘‘4 representatives of private interests including two from irrigated agriculture who 

actively farm more than 100 acres of irrigated land and are not irrigation district managers and two from the environmental community;’’; 

(3) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the final period the following: ‘‘, 

and up to a total amount of $2,000,000 during each of fiscal years 2006 through 

2015’’; and 

(4) in subsection (h), by inserting before the period at the end the following: 

‘‘, and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2015’’. 

SEC. 3. WALLOWA LAKE DAM REHABILITATION ACT. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following definitions apply: 

(1) ASSOCIATED DITCH COMPANIES, INCORPORATED.—The term ‘‘Associated 

Ditch Companies, Incorporated’’ means the nonprofit corporation established 

under the laws of the State of Oregon that operates Wallowa Lake Dam. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
2 

(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior, 

acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation. 

(3) WALLOWA LAKE DAM REHABILITATION PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘Wallowa Lake 

Dam Rehabilitation Program’’ means the program for the rehabilitation of the 

Wallowa Lake Dam in Oregon, as contained in the engineering document titled, 

‘‘Phase I Dam Assessment and Preliminary Engineering Design’’, dated December 2002, and on file with the Bureau of Reclamation. 

(b) AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN PROGRAM.—

(1) GRANTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary may provide 

grants to, or enter into cooperative or other agreements with, tribal, State, and 

local governmental entities and the Associated Ditch Companies, Incorporated, 

to plan, design, and construct facilities needed to implement the Wallowa Lake 

Dam Rehabilitation Program. 

(2) CONDITIONS.—As a condition of providing funds under paragraph (1), the 

Secretary shall ensure that—

(A) the Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation Program and activities under 

this section meet the standards of the dam safety program of the State of 

Oregon; 

(B) the Associated Ditch Companies, Incorporated, agrees to assume liability for any work performed, or supervised, with Federal funds provided 

to it under this section; and 

(C) the United States shall not be liable for damages of any kind arising 

out of any act, omission, or occurrence relating to a facility rehabilitated or 

constructed with Federal funds provided under this section, both while and 

after activities are conducted using Federal funds provided under this section. 

(3) COST SHARING.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of the costs of activities authorized 

under this section shall not exceed 50 percent. 

(B) EXCLUSIONS FROM FEDERAL SHARE.—There shall not be credited 

against the Federal share of such costs—

(i) any expenditure by the Bonneville Power Administration in the 

Wallowa River watershed; and 

(ii) expenditures made by individual agricultural producers in any 

Federal commodity or conservation program. 

(4) COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW.—The Secretary, in carrying out this section, 

shall comply with applicable Oregon State water law. 

(5) PROHIBITION ON HOLDING TITLE.—The Federal Government shall not hold 

title to any facility rehabilitated or constructed under this section. 

(6) PROHIBITION ON OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The Federal Government 

shall not be responsible for the operation and maintenance of any facility constructed or rehabilitated under this section. 

(c) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAW.—Activities funded under this section shall not 

be considered a supplemental or additional benefit under Federal reclamation law 

(the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to 

and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.)). 

(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized to be appropriated 

to the Secretary to pay the Federal share of the costs of activities authorized under 

this section, $6,000,000. 

(e) SUNSET.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out any provisions of this 

section shall terminate 10 years after the date of the enactment of this section. 

SEC. 4. LITTLE BUTTE/BEAR CREEK SUBBASINS, OREGON, WATER RESOURCE STUDY. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of 

Reclamation, may participate in the Water for Irrigation, Streams and the Economy 

Project water management feasibility study and environmental impact statement in 

accordance with the ‘‘Memorandum of Agreement Between City of Medford and Bureau of Reclamation for the Water for Irrigation, Streams, and the Economy 

Project’’, dated July 2, 2004. 

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Bureau of Reclamation $500,000 to carry out activities under this section. 

(2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The non-Federal share shall be 50 percent of the total 

costs of the Bureau of Reclamation in carrying out subsection (a). 

(B) FORM.—The non-Federal share required under subparagraph (A) may 

be in the form of any in-kind services that the Secretary of the Interior determines would contribute substantially toward the conduct and completion 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
3 

of the study and environmental impact statement required under subsection (a). 

(c) SUNSET.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out any provisions of this section shall terminate 10 years after the date of the enactment of this section. 

SEC. 5. NORTH UNIT IRRIGATION DISTRICT. 

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the ‘‘North Unit Irrigation District 

Act of 2006’’. (b) AMENDMENT.—The Act of August 10, 1954 (68 Stat. 679, chapter 663), is 

amended— (1) in the first section— (A) by inserting ‘‘(referred to in this Act as the ‘District’)’’ after ‘‘irrigation 

district’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘(referred to in this Act as the ‘Contract’)’’ after ‘‘1953’’; 

and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL TERMS. 

‘‘On approval of the District directors and notwithstanding project authorizing legislation to the contrary, the Contract is modified, without further action by the Secretary of the Interior, to include the following modifications: ‘‘(1) In Article 8(a) of the Contract, by deleting ‘a maximum of 50,000’ and 

inserting ‘approximately 59,000’ after ‘irrigation service to’. ‘‘(2) In Article 11(a) of the Contract, by deleting ‘The classified irrigable lands 

within the project comprise 49,817.75 irrigable acres, of which 35,773.75 acres 

are in Class A and 14,044.40 in Class B. These lands and the standards upon 

which the classification was made are described in the document entitled ‘‘Land 

Classification, North Unit, Deschutes Project, 1953’’ which is on file in the office 

of the Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, Boise, Idaho, and in the office 

of the District’ and inserting ‘The classified irrigable land within the project 

comprises 58,902.8 irrigable acres, all of which are authorized to receive irrigation water pursuant to water rights issued by the State of Oregon and have in 

the past received water pursuant to such State water rights.’. ‘‘(3) In Article 11(c) of the Contract, by deleting ‘, with the approval of the 

Secretary,’ after ‘District may’, by deleting ‘the 49,817.75 acre maximum limit 

on the irrigable area is not exceeded’ and inserting ‘irrigation service is provided to no more than approximately 59,000 acres and no amendment to the 

District boundary is required’ after ‘time so long as’. ‘‘(4) In Article 11(d) of the Contract, by inserting ‘, and may further be used 

for instream purposes, including fish or wildlife purposes, to the extent that 

such use is required by Oregon State law in order for the District to engage in, 

or take advantage of, conserved water projects as authorized by Oregon State 

law’ after ‘herein provided’. 

‘‘(5) By adding at the end of Article 12(d) the following: ‘(e) Notwithstanding 

the above subsections of this Article or Article 13 below, beginning with the irrigation season immediately following the date of enactment of the North Unit 

Irrigation District Act of 2006, the annual installment for each year, for the District, under the Contract, on account of the District’s construction charge obligation, shall be a fixed and equal annual amount payable on June 30 the year 

following the year for which it is applicable, such that the District’s total construction charge obligation shall be completely paid by June 30, 2044.’. 

‘‘(6) In Article 14(a) of the Contract, by inserting ‘and for instream purposes, 

including fish or wildlife purposes, to the extent that such use is required by 

Oregon State law in order for the District to engage in, or take advantage of, 

conserved water projects as authorized by Oregon State law,’ after ‘and incidental stock and domestic uses’, by inserting ‘and for instream purposes as described above,’ after ‘irrigation, stock and domestic uses’, and by inserting ‘, including natural flow rights out of the Crooked River held by the District’ after 

‘irrigation system’. 

‘‘(7) In Article 29(a) of the Contract, by inserting ‘and for instream purposes, 

including fish or wildlife purposes, to the extent that such use is required by 

Oregon State law in order for the District to engage in, or take advantage of, 

conserved water projects as authorized by Oregon State law’ after ‘provided in 

article 11’. 

‘‘(8) In Article 34 of the Contract, by deleting ‘The District, after the election 

and upon the execution of this contract, shall promptly secure final decree of 

the proper State court approving and confirming this contract and decreeing 

and adjudging it to be a lawful, valid, and binding general obligation of the District. The District shall furnish to the United States certified copies of such decrees and of all pertinent supporting records.’ after ‘for that purpose.’. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
4 

‘‘SEC. 4. FUTURE AUTHORITY TO RENEGOTIATE. 

‘‘The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation) 

may in the future renegotiate with the District such terms of the Contract as the 

District directors determine to be necessary, only upon the written request of the 

District directors and the consent of the Commissioner of Reclamation.’’. 

Amend the title so as to read: 

A bill to update the management of Oregon water resources, and for other purposes. 

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The purpose of H.R. 5079, as ordered reported, is to update the 

management of Oregon water resources, and for other purposes. 

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

Originally formed in 1916, the North Unit Irrigation District is 

one of seven irrigation districts located in central Oregon and provides irrigated water to approximately 59,000 acres of farmland. Of 

that farmland, the District provides irrigation water to 49,900 

acres, associated with the Bureau of Reclamation’s Deschutes 

Project, while the remaining 9,000 acres are irrigated using water 

from the privately developed Crooked River diversion. 

In 1954, Congress authorized through Public Law 83–573 construction of the Haystack Dam and approved a contract between 

the Bureau of Reclamation and the District. That contract established, among other things, project costs, repayment terms, operations and maintenance charges, and the maximum allowable acreage that could be irrigated from federal project water. Recent 

changes in State law have caused the need to amend the contract. 

Specifically, Oregon law requires irrigation districts that want to 

participate in a publicly financed ‘‘conserved water project’’ to dedicate a portion of conserved water to instream flows for fish, wildlife 

or other purposes. The District would like to consider participation 

in a publicly financed conservation water project, but the contract 

terms limit water use from the federal project to irrigation purposes only. The legislation allows the District to comply with State 

law if it chooses to participate in a conserved water project. 

The amended contract language would allow the District to deliver Deschutes Project water to families who are currently irrigating 9,000 acres of land in the District with Crooked River water. 

All of these lands are within the District’s present boundary, have 

been irrigated for decades, and have appurtenant water rights 

issued by the State. Using Deschutes Project water on these lands 

will allow the District to divert less Crooked River water and leave 

more water instream. For the District to shift its reliance to 

Deschutes Project water supplies, it must first conserve the necessary water or secure conserved water from another water district. 

The District states that this legislation will enable it to conserve 

water, to return a portion of the conserved water to the Deschutes 

River, and ultimately to use less water from the Crooked River, 

thereby benefitting fish and wildlife. The legislation is specific to 

the District, and it would not affect any other district in the 

Deschutes Project, its patrons, or any others in Oregon. The Department of the Interior has formally acknowledged the District’s 

legal situation, that Congressional authorization is needed, and 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
5 

that it will work cooperatively with the District in resolving these 

problems. 

As ordered reported, the bill also includes various other water 

projects affecting the State of Oregon. These are described more 

specifically below. 

COMMITTEE ACTION

H.R. 5079 was introduced on April 4, 2006, by Congressman 

Greg Walden (R–OR). The bill was referred to the Committee on 

Resources, and within the Committee to the Subcommittee on 

Water and Power. On May 10, 2006, the Subcommittee held a 

hearing on the bill. On June 21, 2006, the Full Resources Committee met to consider the bill. The Subcommittee on Water and 

Power was discharged from further consideration of the bill by 

unanimous consent. Congressman George Radanovich (R–CA) offered an amendment in the nature of a substitute to incorporate 

legislative language from H.R. 5019, S. 166, and S. 251 into H.R. 

5079. The amendment was adopted by unanimous consent. The 

bill, as amended, was then ordered favorably reported to the House 

of Representatives by unanimous consent. 

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1. Short title 

This section cites the short title of the bill as the ‘‘Oregon Water 

Resources Management Act of 2006’’. 

Section 2. Extension of participation of Bureau of Reclamation in 

Deschutes River Conservancy 

This section amends Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 (division B of Public Law 104–208). It replaces references to the ‘‘Deschutes River Basin Working Group’’ with the ‘‘Deschutes River Conservancy Working Group,’’ and redesignates the background requirements for two representatives 

nominated to the Working Group. Finally it increases authorization 

of appropriations to $2 million per year, and extends that authorization until fiscal year 2015. This language is taken from S. 166. 

Section 3. Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation Act 

This section authorizes the Bureau of Reclamation to participate 

with the Associated Ditch Companies in the planning, design, and 

construction of facilities needed to implement the Wallowa Lake 

Dam Rehabilitation Program. The federal share of costs will not exceed 50%, and no funds will be used for facility operations and 

maintenance. There is authorized to be appropriated $6 million, 

and the authority to carry out any provisions of this section shall 

terminate in 10 years. This language is taken from H.R. 5019. 

Section 4. Little Butte/Bear Creek Subbasins, Oregon water resource study 

This section authorizes the Bureau of Reclamation to participate, 

with the City of Medford, Oregon, in the Water for Irrigation, 

Streams and the Economy Project water management feasibility 

study. There is authorized to be appropriated $500,000 to carry out 

this study and it includes a 50% federal cost share. The authority 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
6 

to carry out any provisions of this section shall terminate in 10 

years. This language is taken from S. 251. 

Section 5. North Unit Irrigation District 

This section amends a repayment contract (#14–06–W–71), authorized in Public Law 83–573, between the Bureau of Reclamation 

and the North Unit Irrigation District in Oregon. As amended, it 

changes the irrigated land available to receive water from the Bureau of Reclamation’s Deschutes Project from 50,000 acres to 

59,000 acres. It also changes the repayment terms from a variable 

rate to a fixed rate. Additionally, it authorizes the Secretary of the 

Interior to renegotiate contract terms upon the written request of 

the Irrigation District. 

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Regarding clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII 

of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Resources’ oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in 

the body of this report. 

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Article I, section 8, clause 3 of the Constitution of the United 

States grants Congress the authority to enact this bill. 

COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XIII 

1. Cost of Legislation. Clause 3(d)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of 

the House of Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison by the Committee of the costs which would be incurred in carrying out this bill. However, clause 3(d)(3)(B) of that rule provides 

that this requirement does not apply when the Committee has included in its report a timely submitted cost estimate of the bill prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. 

2. Congressional Budget Act. As required by clause 3(c)(2) of rule 

XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 

308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, this bill does not 

contain any new budget authority, spending authority, credit authority, or an increase or decrease in revenues or tax expenditures. 

According to the Congressional Budget Office, enacting this bill will 

increase offsetting receipts by less than $100,000 a year. 

3. General Performance Goals and Objectives. As required by 

clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII, the general performance goal or objective 

of this bill, as ordered reported, is to update the management of 

Oregon water resources, and for other purposes. 

4. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate. Under clause 

3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and 

section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the following cost estimate for this bill from the 

Director of the Congressional Budget Office: 

H.R. 5079—Oregon Water Resources Management Act of 2006 

Summary: H.R. 5079 would authorize the appropriation of $16.5 

million over the 2007–2011 period, and another $8 million over the 

2012–2015 period for river restoration and water management 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
7 

projects in Oregon. Assuming appropriation of the authorized 

amounts, CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 5079 would cost 

$2 million in 2007 and $14 million over the 2007–2011 period (the 

remaining funds would be spent after 2011). 

The bill also would amend certain provisions of a contract between the Department of the Interior and Oregon’s North Unit Irrigation District. Enacting this section would increase federal collections by less than $100,000 a year. (Such collections are recorded 

as offsetting receipts, a credit against direct spending.) Enacting 

this bill would not affect revenues. 

H.R. 5079 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA); 

the bill would benefit state, local, and tribal governments and any 

costs to those governments would be incurred voluntarily. 

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 5079 is shown in the following table. The costs 

of this legislation fall within budget function 300 (natural resources 

and environment). 

By fiscal year, in millions of dollars— 

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 

CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION 

Deschutes River Restoration Projects: 

Authorization Level ............................................................................... 2 2 2 2 2 

Estimated Outlays ................................................................................ * 1 2 2 2 

Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation: 

Estimated Authorization Level ............................................................. 2 2 2 0 0 

Estimated Outlays ................................................................................ 1 2 2 1 0 

Water Management Study: 

Authorization Level ............................................................................... 0.5 0 0 0 0 

Estimated Outlays ................................................................................ 0.5 0 0 0 0 

Total Changes: 

Estimated Authorization Level .................................................... 5 4 4 2 2 

Estimated Outlays ....................................................................... 2 3 4 3 2 

NOTE: * = less than $500,000. 

Basis of estimate 

For this estimate, CBO assumes that H.R. 5097 will be enacted 

near the start of fiscal year 2007 and that amounts specified will 

be appropriated beginning in 2007. Estimates of outlays are based 

on historical spending patterns for similar Bureau of Reclamation 

activities. 

Spending subject to appropriation 

H.R. 5079 would authorize the appropriation of $16.5 million 

over the 2007–2011 period, and an additional $8 million to be authorized over the 2012–2015 period. Assuming appropriation of the 

authorized amounts, CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 5079 

would cost $2 million in 2007 and $14 million over the 2007–2011 

period (additional amounts would be spent after 2011). As described below, these amounts would be primarily used for the Bureau of Reclamation restoration and water management activities 

in Oregon. 

Deschutes River Restoration Projects. Section 2 would authorize 

the appropriation of $12 million over the 2006–2011 period and $8 

million over the 2012–2015 period for ecosystem projects administered by the bureau in the Deschutes River basin region. Assuming 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
8 

appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO estimates that the 

project would cost $7 million over the 2007–2011 period, with the 

remaining funds to be spent after 2011. 

Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation. Section 3 would authorize the 

appropriation of $6 million for the bureau’s share of the cost to participate in the Wallowa Lake Dam rehabilitation. CBO expects that 

$2 million would be provided each year over the 2007–2009 period. 

Appropriation of the authorized amount would result in discretionary spending of $6 million over the 2007–2011 period. 

Water Management Study. Section 4 would authorize the appropriation of $500,000 to the bureau to participate in a water management study of the Little Butte and Bear Creek watersheds in 

Medford, Oregon. The study would identify ways to meet future 

water supply needs and to improve water quality, conservation, 

and storage measures. Assuming appropriation of the authorized 

amounts, the study would cost $500,000 in 2007. 

Direct spending 

H.R. 5079 would amend the North Unit’s Irrigation District repayment contract with the Department of the Interior. Under current law, payments would be completed within the next 35 to 45 

years. H.R. 5079 would amend the terms of the district’s contract 

with the department by setting a fixed annual payment, and require the district’s total obligation to be paid to the department by 

2044. CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 5079 would increase offsetting receipts by less than $100,000 a year. 

Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: H.R. 5079 contains 

no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in 

UMRA. Enacting this bill would benefit state, local, and tribal governments by authorizing funds for restoration projects; any costs 

that they might incur would result from complying with conditions 

for receiving federal assistance. 

Previous CBO estimates: CBO transmitted three cost estimates 

for bills that include similar provisions to those contained in H.R. 

5079. On February 14, 2005, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for 

S. 231, the Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation and Water Management Act of 2005, as ordered reported by the Senate Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources on February 9, 2005. Both S. 231 

and H.R. 5079 authorize appropriations for Wallowa Lake Dam rehabilitation, but H.R. 5079 limits the authorization of appropriations to phase I projects. H.R. 5079 would not result in an increase 

in direct spending by the Bonneville Power Administration as CBO 

estimated under S. 231. 

On October 7, 2005, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for S. 166, 

the Deschutes River Conservancy Reauthorization Act of 2005, as 

ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources on September 28, 2005. Both S. 166 and H.R. 5097 

would authorize appropriations to restore the Deschutes River 

basin. The differences in the cost estimates for those provisions are 

due to different assumed dates of enactment. 

On October 7, 2005, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for S. 251, 

the Little Butte/Bear Creek Subbasins Water Feasibility Act, as ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources on September 28, 2005. Both S. 251 and H.R. 5079 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
9 

would authorize the appropriation of $0.5 million for a water management feasibility study. 

Estimate prepared by: Federal costs: Julie Middleton; Impact on 

state, local, and tribal governments: Lisa Ramirez-Branum; Impact 

on the private sector: Amy Petz. 

Estimate approved by: Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC LAW 104–4 

This bill contains no unfunded mandates. 

PREEMPTION OF STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW

This bill is not intended to preempt any State, local or tribal law. 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, 

as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, 

existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): 

SECTION 301 OF THE OREGON RESOURCE 

CONSERVATION ACT OF 1996 

SEC. 301. DESCHUTES BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECTS. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) WORKING GROUP.—The term ‘‘Working Group’’ means the 

øDeschutes River Basin Working Group¿ Deschutes River Conservancy Working Group established before the date of enactment of this title, consisting of members nominated by their 

represented groups, including: 

(A) * * * 

(B) ø4 representatives of private interests including two 

each from irrigated agriculture and the environmental 

community;¿ 4 representatives of private interests including 

two from irrigated agriculture who actively farm more than 

100 acres of irrigated land and are not irrigation district 

managers and two from the environmental community; 

* * * * * * * 

(b) IN GENERAL.—

(1) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(3) The Bureau of Reclamation shall pay from funds authorized under subsection (h) of this title up to 50 percent of the 

cost of performing any project proposed by the Working Group 

and approved by the Secretary, up to a total amount of 

$1,000,000 during each of the fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 

and up to a total amount of $2,000,000 during each of fiscal 

years 2002 through 2006, and up to a total amount of 

$2,000,000 during each of fiscal years 2006 through 2015. 

* * * * * * * 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
10 

(h) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized 

to be appropriated to carry out this title $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1997 through 2001 and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

2002 through 2006, and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 

through 2015. 

ACT OF AUGUST 10, 1954 

AN ACT To approve an amendatory repayment contract negotiated with the North 

Unit irrigation district, to authorize construction of Haystack Reservoir on the 

Deschutes Federal reclamation project, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the contract 

with the North Unit irrigation district (referred to in this Act as the 

‘‘District’’) in form substantially similar to that approved by the district directors on July 31, 1953 (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Contract’’), which has been negotiated by the Secretary of the Interior 

pursuant to section 7, subsection (a), of the Reclamation Project Act 

of 1939 (53 Stat. 1187, 1192; 43 U.S.C., 1946 edition, sec. 485), is 

approved and the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to execute 

it on behalf of the United States. 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL TERMS. 

On approval of the District directors and notwithstanding project 

authorizing legislation to the contrary, the Contract is modified, 

without further action by the Secretary of the Interior, to include the 

following modifications: 

(1) In Article 8(a) of the Contract, by deleting ‘‘a maximum 

of 50,000’’ and inserting ‘‘approximately 59,000’’ after ‘‘irrigation service to’’. (2) In Article 11(a) of the Contract, by deleting ‘‘The classified 

irrigable lands within the project comprise 49,817.75 irrigable 

acres, of which 35,773.75 acres are in Class A and 14,044.40 

in Class B. These lands and the standards upon which the classification was made are described in the document entitled 

‘Land Classification, North Unit, Deschutes Project, 1953’

which is on file in the office of the Regional Director, Bureau 

of Reclamation, Boise, Idaho, and in the office of the District’’

and inserting ‘‘The classified irrigable land within the project 

comprises 58,902.8 irrigable acres, all of which are authorized 

to receive irrigation water pursuant to water rights issued by 

the State of Oregon and have in the past received water pursuant to such State water rights.’’. 

(3) In Article 11(c) of the Contract, by deleting ‘‘, with the approval of the Secretary,’’ after ‘‘District may’’, by deleting ‘‘the 

49,817.75 acre maximum limit on the irrigable area is not exceeded’’ and inserting ‘‘irrigation service is provided to no more 

than approximately 59,000 acres and no amendment to the District boundary is required’’ after ‘‘time so long as’’. 

(4) In Article 11(d) of the Contract, by inserting ‘‘, and may 

further be used for instream purposes, including fish or wildlife 

purposes, to the extent that such use is required by Oregon 

State law in order for the District to engage in, or take advanVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:01 Sep 09, 2006 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR636.XXX HR636

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
11 

tage of, conserved water projects as authorized by Oregon State 

law’’ after ‘‘herein provided’’. (5) By adding at the end of Article 12(d) the following: ‘‘(e) 

Notwithstanding the above subsections of this Article or Article 

13 below, beginning with the irrigation season immediately following the date of enactment of the North Unit Irrigation District Act of 2006, the annual installment for each year, for the 

District, under the Contract, on account of the District’s construction charge obligation, shall be a fixed and equal annual 

amount payable on June 30 the year following the year for 

which it is applicable, such that the District’s total construction 

charge obligation shall be completely paid by June 30, 2044.’’. (6) In Article 14(a) of the Contract, by inserting ‘‘and for 

instream purposes, including fish or wildlife purposes, to the 

extent that such use is required by Oregon State law in order 

for the District to engage in, or take advantage of, conserved 

water projects as authorized by Oregon State law,’’ after ‘‘and 

incidental stock and domestic uses’’, by inserting ‘‘and for 

instream purposes as described above,’’ after ‘‘irrigation, stock 

and domestic uses’’, and by inserting ‘‘, including natural flow 

rights out of the Crooked River held by the District’’ after ‘‘irrigation system’’. (7) In Article 29(a) of the Contract, by inserting ‘‘and for 

instream purposes, including fish or wildlife purposes, to the 

extent that such use is required by Oregon State law in order 

for the District to engage in, or take advantage of, conserved 

water projects as authorized by Oregon State law’’ after ‘‘provided in article 11’’. (8) In Article 34 of the Contract, by deleting ‘‘The District, 

after the election and upon the execution of this contract, shall 

promptly secure final decree of the proper State court approving 

and confirming this contract and decreeing and adjudging it to 

be a lawful, valid, and binding general obligation of the District. The District shall furnish to the United States certified 

copies of such decrees and of all pertinent supporting records.’’

after ‘‘for that purpose.’’. 

SEC. 4. FUTURE AUTHORITY TO RENEGOTIATE. 

The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the Commissioner of 

Reclamation) may in the future renegotiate with the District such 

terms of the Contract as the District directors determine to be necessary, only upon the written request of the District directors and 

the consent of the Commissioner of Reclamation. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING