alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 924 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 924

 To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2023

Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Manchin, Mr. 
 Warner, and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend the 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 
Historical Park Commission Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK COMMISSION.

    Section 6(g) of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act (16 
U.S.C. 410y-4(g)) is amended by striking ``40'' and all that follows 
through the period at the end and inserting ``on September 30, 2034.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Bruce Kaiserman, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 2006-3 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
     respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Bank of America, National Association, as Servicer, CitiMortgage,
     Inc., as Servicer, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer,
     GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as Servicer, Republic Federal Bank
     National Association f/k/a The Hemisphere National Bank, as Servicer,
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master
     Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trust
     Administrator.


     Dated:    May 23, 2008

    /s/ Bruce Kaiserman
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20902 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO ANTONIO GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-305-1

--------------------

October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Antonia Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”) appeals his conviction

and 57-month sentence following his plea of guilty to illegal

reentry into the United States after deportation, a violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gutierrez argues that the felony conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been

charged in his indictment. 

Gutierrez acknowledges that his first argument is foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but
No. 00-20902

-2-

he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light

of decision in Apprendi because the Supreme Court indicated in

Apprendi that Almendarez- Torres may have been wrongly decided. 

Because the Supreme Court has not overruled Almendarez-Torres,

this court is compelled to follow it. See United States v.

Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121

S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Gutierrez’s argument is foreclosed. See

Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235. 

Gutierrez also argues that his indictment was defective

under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it did not allege

general intent. Because Gutierrez withdrew this argument in the

district court, review is foreclosed. See United States v.

Reveles, 190 F.3d 678 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Olano,

507 U.S. 725 (1993).

Gutierrez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

CHASTABEAR WILLIAM PARKER, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0672 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2011-130043-001

The Honorable Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Chastabear William Parker, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Michael J. Brown and Judge 

Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 2-14-2019
STATE v. PARKER

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Chastabear William Parker seeks review of the 

superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's 

fifth petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
#### § 2544.115 Who may offer a donation?

Anyone, including an individual, group of individuals, organization, corporation, or association may offer a donation to the Corporation.
#### § 1232.8 Effect of state or local law.

The obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any state or local law or other requirement that, on the basis of handicap, imposes prohibitions or limits upon the eligibility of qualified handicapped persons to receive services or to practice any occupation or profession.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARIO ABREU

,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF

PROBATION AND PAROLE

,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 69 MAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 127 MD 2014

dated 6/6/16, exited 6/7/16

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: February 22, 2017

AND NOW , this 2 2nd day of February , the Order of the Commonwealth Court is

hereby AFFIRMED

.
#### § 2525.25 If a participant in an approved Summer of Service or Silver Scholar position does not complete their term of service, are they eligible to receive a pro-rated education award?

No. An individual released for any reason before they complete an approved term of service in a Silver Scholar or Summer of Service position is not eligible to receive a pro-rated award.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vedanta Limited (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|(i) | the accompanying annual report on Form 20F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2015



By:

/s/ Din Dayal JalanName: Din Dayal Jalan Title: Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 865 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 865

  To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to promote transparency by 
 permitting the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to allow its 
   disciplinary proceedings to be open to the public, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2023

Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to promote transparency by 
 permitting the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to allow its 
   disciplinary proceedings to be open to the public, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PCAOB Enforcement Transparency Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. OPEN MEETINGS AUTHORIZED.

    Section 105(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7215(c)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(2) Public hearings.--Hearings under this section shall 
        be open to the public, unless the Board, on its own motion or 
        after considering the motion of a party, orders otherwise.''.

SEC. 3. PUBLICATION OF DETERMINATIONS.

    Section 105(d)(1)(C) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7215(d)(1)(C)) is amended by striking ``(once any stay on the 
imposition of such sanction has been lifted)''.
                                 <all>
```
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

MEMORANDUM November 18, 2022 

TO: Patricia C. Orrock

 Chief Compliance Officer

 Dayna Brown

 Assistant Staff Director

 Audit Division 

FROM: Neven F. Stipanovic 

 Associate General Counsel 

Policy Division 

 Jessica Selinkoff

 Assistant General Counsel

 Compliance Advice

 Jennifer Waldman

 Attorney

 

SUBJECT: Interim Audit Report on Latinos for America First (LRA 1161) 

 The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed the proposed Interim Audit Report 

(“IAR”) for the Latinos for America First committee. The IAR contains three findings: 

Misstatement of Financial Activity (Finding 1), Increased Activity (Finding 2), and Disclosure 

of Occupation and/or Name of Employer (Finding 3). We concur with the findings. If you 

have any questions, please contact Jennifer Waldman, the attorney assigned to this audit.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


FLEX
FUELS ENERGY, INC.


FORM
10-KSB/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Brian
Barrows, am the Chief Executive Officer of Flex Fuels Energy, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Annual
Report").




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 26, 2008By:
      /s/
      Brian  Barrows
              
              Brian
      Barrows
              Chief
      Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 99.8



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended annual report of Westport
Innovations Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Larkin, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|March 27, 2014 | /s/ William Larkin     
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               |                        
|               | William Larkin         
|               | Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this amended annual report
on Form 40-F/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            693 - RAST 2006-A9



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2010 

# Order

April 28, 2010

140625 & (40)

ST. JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND a/k/a TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN, Plaintiff Counter Defendant-Appellant, SC: 140625 V CoA: 286946 Oakland CC: 04-059636-CK DETROIT OSTEOOPATHIC HOSPITAL CORPORATION, d/ b/a BI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a/k/a HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS and ANDREA ABESSINIO, Defendant Counter Plaintiffs-Appellees.

________________ _________________

On order of the Chief Justice, a s tipulation signed by th e attorneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the applicati on for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
#### § 158.310 Who may request adjustment to the medical loss ratio.

A request for an adjustment to the MLR standard for a State must be submitted by the State's insurance commissioner, superintendent, or comparable official of that State in order to be considered by the Secretary.
§ 1618.5 Duties of the Corporation. ( a ) Whenever the Corporation learns that there is reason to believe that a recipient or a recipient's employee may have committed a violation, the Corporation shall investigate the matter promptly and attempt to resolve it through informal consultation with the recipient. Such actions may be limited to determining if the recipient is sufficiently investigating and resolving the matter itself.
( b ) Whenever there is substantial reason to believe that a recipient has persistently or intentionally violated the LSC requirements, or, after notice, has failed to take appropriate remedial or disciplinary action to ensure compliance by its employees with the LSC requirements, and attempts at informal resolution have been unsuccessful, the Corporation may proceed to suspend or terminate financial support of the recipient, or impose a limited reduction in funding, pursuant to the procedures set forth in parts 1623 and 1606, or may take other action to enforce compliance with the LSC requirements.
( c ) Whenever the Corporation determines that a recipient has committed a violation, that corrective actions by the recipient are required to remedy the violation and/or prevent recurrence of the violation, and that imposition of special grant conditions are needed prior to the next grant renewal or competition for the service area, the Corporation may immediately impose Special Grant Conditions on the recipient to require completion of those corrective actions.
**EXHIBIT 31. (2)**

CERTIFICATIONS

 I, Brian Cameron certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F for Black Diamond Holdings Corporation; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 16, 2007

 /s/ Brain Cameron
#### § 1612.4 Grassroots lobbying.

A recipient shall not engage in any grassroots lobbying.