alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 164.406 Notification to the media. ( a ) *Standard.* For a breach of unsecured protected health information involving more than 500 residents of a State or jurisdiction, a covered entity shall, following the discovery of the breach as provided in § 164.404(a)(2), notify prominent media outlets serving the State or jurisdiction.
( b ) *Implementation specification: Timeliness of notification.* Except as provided in § 164.412, a covered entity shall provide the notification required by paragraph (a) of this section without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of a breach.
( c ) *Implementation specifications: Content of notification.* The notification required by paragraph (a) of this section shall meet the requirements of § 164.404(c).
[74 FR 42767, Aug. 24, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 5695, Jan. 25, 2013]
STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 1 of 1
NANOMATERIAL
P-08-0199 3/17/2008

Assessor: C. Cinalli

Summary – This standard review report is ex actly the same as the initial review report since did not change in the SR engineering report dated 3/17/08.

Production Volume:
USE:
OTHER USES:
Chemical Name:

Fate Assessment :

Due to the novel nature of nanomaterials, it is not possible at this time to make assumptions about their behavior in the envir onment without the collection of physicochemical (p-chem) and fate data. The p-chem properties which seem most important for fate assessment are: surface reactivity, aggregat ion/agglomeration, physical form, particle size distribution, surface area solubility, dispersabi lity, shape, adsorption tendency and surface charge porosity.

These p-chem properties are novel to nanomater ials and are not estimated by our current collection of fate models, EPI Suite. Therefore, specific data on the ac tual behavior of the nanomaterial in waste water treatment plants (e.g., biodegradation, sorption to sludge, volatilization, etc.) and drinking water treatment plants (e.g., eff ect of chlorination, oxygenation, etc.) are needed to determine removal rates. Ad ditionally, data are needed to assess the potential for ground water migration. Testing methods typical ly used for these parameters (e.g., ready biodegradation test, porous pot, etc.) may or may not apply. If the amount of the nanomaterial released is of concern, EAB recommends that th e submitter evaluate the current OPPT guidelines for fate testing and then submit fate testing pr otocols based on their specific knowledge of the nanomaterial to the EAB’s fate experts for their revi ew prior to the actual testing. It is possible
that after several nanomaterials have gone through p-chem and fate testing, that models in EPI Suite could be validated for use, or, more likely, a new fate mode l or models could be developed
to estimate the fate of a new na nomaterial in the environment.

General Population and Environmental Exposure
§ 164.500 Applicability. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided herein, the standards, requirements, and implementation specifications of this subpart apply to covered entities with respect to protected health information.
( b ) Health care clearinghouses must comply with the standards, requirements, and implementation specifications as follows: ( 1 ) When a health care clearinghouse creates or receives protected health information as a business associate of another covered entity, the clearinghouse must comply with: ( i ) Section 164.500 relating to applicability;
( ii ) Section 164.501 relating to definitions;
( iii ) Section 164.502 relating to uses and disclosures of protected health information, except that a clearinghouse is prohibited from using or disclosing protected health information other than as permitted in the business associate contract under which it created or received the protected health information;
( iv ) Section 164.504 relating to the organizational requirements for covered entities;
( v ) Section 164.512 relating to uses and disclosures for which individual authorization or an opportunity to agree or object is not required, except that a clearinghouse is prohibited from using or disclosing protected health information other than as permitted in the business associate contract under which it created or received the protected health information;
( vi ) Section 164.532 relating to transition requirements; and
( vii ) Section 164.534 relating to compliance dates for initial implementation of the privacy standards.
( 2 ) When a health care clearinghouse creates or receives protected health information other than as a business associate of a covered entity, the clearinghouse must comply with all of the standards, requirements, and implementation specifications of this subpart.
( c ) Where provided, the standards, requirements, and implementation specifications adopted under this subpart apply to a business associate with respect to the protected health information of a covered entity.
( d ) The standards, requirements, and implementation specifications of this subpart do not apply to the Department of Defense or to any other federal agency, or non-governmental organization acting on its behalf, when providing health care to overseas foreign national beneficiaries.
[65 FR 82802, Dec. 28, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 53266, Aug. 14, 2002; 68 FR 8381, Feb. 20, 2003; 78 FR 5695, Jan. 25, 2013]
§ 1351.27 What are the additional requirements that the Street Outreach Program grantees must meet? ( a ) Grantees shall provide services that are designed to assist clients in leaving the streets, making healthy choices, and building trusting relationships in areas where targeted youth congregate.
( b ) Grantees shall directly or by referral provide treatment, counseling, prevention, and education services to clients as well as referral for emergency shelter.
( c ) Additional requirements included in the funding opportunity announcement.
§ 2400.58 Repayment of stipend. ( a ) If a Fellow fails to secure a master's degree, fails to teach American history, American government, social studies, or political science on a full-time basis in a secondary school for at least one school year for each academic year for which assistance was provided under a fellowship, fails to secure at least 12 semester hours or their credit hour equivalent for study of the Constitution as indicated in § 2400.43(b), or fails to attend the Foundation's Summer Institute on the Constitution, the Fellow must repay all of the fellowship costs received plus interest at the rate of 6% per annum or as otherwise authorized and, if applicable, reasonable collection fees, as prescribed in Section 807 of the Act (20 U.S.C. 4506(b)).
( b ) If a Fellow withdraws from the fellowship or has a fellowship terminated by the Foundation, the Fellow must repay all fellowship funds which have been remitted to the Fellow or on his or her behalf under a fellowship.
[61 FR 46734, Sept. 5, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 11815, Mar. 12, 2004]
**Exhibit 3.2(a)**

**San Joaquin Bancorp**

Resolution of the Board of Directors November 21,2006

Amendment of Article IV, Section 4.1 of the Bylaws

     WHEREAS, Article IX, Section 9.2 of the bylaws states, "Subject to the rights of shareholders as provided in Section 8.7 of these Bylaws, Bylaws may be adopted,amended or repealed by the Board of Directors; provided, however, that the Board of Directors may adopt a bylaw or amendment of a bylaw changing the authorized number of directors only for the purpose of fixing the exact number of directors withinthe limits specified in the Articles of Incorporation or in Section 3.2 of these Bylaws;"

     WHEREAS, a proposed amendment of Article IV, Section 4.1 of the Bylaws has been presented to the Board of Directors on this date;

     WHEREAS, it is believed to be in the best interests of San Joaquin Bancorp to amend the Bylaws as proposed.

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following clause replaces the first paragraph of existing Section 4.1 of the Bylaws of San Joaquin Bancorp:

4.1 Committees of Directors. The board of directors may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the authorized number of directors, designate one or more committees, each consisting of twoor more directors, to serve at the pleasure of the board. The board of directors may also approve committee charters (and amendments thereto) with provisions that are consistent with or required by law or the applicable rules of any exchange uponwhich the Company is listed. The chairman of the board may, in his discretion, recommend any member (including alternate members) of the board of directors to serve on board committees; provided, however, that any such recommendations are consistentwith the implementing resolutions or the committee charter adopted or approved by the board. The appointment of members or alternate members of a committee requires the vote of a majority of the authorized directors. Unless the board of directorsshall otherwise prescribe the manner of proceedings of any such committee, meetings of such committees may be scheduled in advance or called at any time by the board of directors, the chairman of the board or any two members of the committeethereof; otherwise the provisions of these bylaws and the charter, if any, with respect to notice and conduct of meetings of the board shall govern. Any committee, to the extent provided in the resolution of the board or any charter approved by theboard, shall have all of the authority of the board, except with respect to: [Remaining portions of this section are unchanged].

----
Manchester District Court,

No. 5311.

#### State *v.*Lucien L. Doucet.

Argued February 3, 1965.

Decided March 31, 1965.

*William*Maynard, Attorney General and *Irma A. Matthews,*Attorney *{Mrs. Matthews*orally), for the State.

*Danais & Danais*and *Edward J. McDermott {Mr. McDermott*orally), for the defendant.

Kenison, C.J.

The defendant correctly argues that the State must both allege and prove two convictions if the defendant is *226to be found guilty of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense. RSA 262:19 (supp); RSA 262-A:62 (supp). *Cedergren*v. Clarke, 99 N. H. 421. When greater penalties are prescribed for a second offense or a subsequent offense, they cannot be imposed without allegation and proof of a prior conviction. *State*v. *Adams,*64 N. H. 440, 441. While there are several alternative methods of proving the previous conviction *(State*v. Blais, 104 N. H. 214) the burden is on the State to introduce evidence thereof as required by the statute. *State*v. Cardin, 102 N. H. 314. It is thus clear that the defendant could not be convicted for a second offense in this case. From this vantage point the defendant contends that he can be convicted of no offense and that the action of the trial judge constituted an amendment of the criminal complaint which was unlawful and unconstitutional.

Where there is no evidence to support the part of a criminal complaint which charged a second offense, it is proper to proceed with the trial of the defendant as for a first offense. In *Commonwealth*v. *Barney,*258 Mass. 609, the defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle on a public way “while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, said offense being a second offense.” There was evidence sufficient to show a single offense but no evidence to establish the allegation of a second offense. The court there ruled that the jury were properly instructed to disregard the allegation of second offense as not supported by evidence and consider whether the defendant had committed a first offense. Such a procedure is not considered an amendment of the indictment or criminal complaint by the presiding justice. *Salinger*v. *United States,*272 U. S. 542; 5 Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure *s.*2056; *Vincent*v. *United States,*337 F. 2d 891 (8th Cir. 1964); *Overstreet v. United States,*321 F. 2d 459 (5th Cir. 1963).

*Defendant's exceptions overruled; remanded.*

Bland in, J., did not sit; the others concurred.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
La Cortez Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Nadine C. Smith, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Nadine C. SmithName:
                  Nadine
      C. SmithTitle:
                  Interim
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                  April
      9, 2009
§ 1184.3 How do I request records? ( a ) *Where to send a request.* You may make a FOIA request for IMLS records by completing the online prompts in the FOIA Online Portal via FOIA.gov or via *https://www.imls.gov/about/foia-request/form* or by sending an email to *foia@imls.gov* or by submitting a request in writing via regular U.S. Mail addressed directly to the FOIA Public Liaison, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North SW, Suite 4000, Washington, DC 20024-2135. Requests may also be sent in writing via facsimile to the FOIA Officer at (202) 653-4625.
( b ) *Form of request.* Your FOIA request need not be in any particular format, but it must be in writing, include your name and mailing address, and should be clearly identified as a Freedom of Information Act or “FOIA” request. You must describe the records you seek with sufficient specificity to enable the agency to identify and locate the records, including, if possible, dates, subjects, titles, or authors of the records requested. Before submitting a request, you may contact IMLS's FOIA contact or FOIA Officer to discuss the records you seek and to receive assistance in describing the records. If upon receiving your request IMLS determines that it does not reasonably describe the requested records, IMLS will advise you what additional information is required to perfect your request, or why your request is otherwise insufficient. You should also indicate if you have a preferred form or format in which you would like to receive the requested records.
( c ) *Electronic format records.* IMLS will provide the responsive records in the form or format you request if the records are readily reproducible by IMLS in that form or format. IMLS will make reasonable efforts to maintain its records in forms or formats that are reproducible for the purpose of disclosure. IMLS may disclose records in electronic format if the records can be downloaded or transferred intact through electronic media currently in use by the agency. In responding to a request for records, IMLS will make reasonable efforts to search for the records in electronic form or format, except where such efforts would significantly interfere with the operation of the agency's automated information system(s).
( d ) *Date of receipt.* IMLS considers a request that complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section to be a perfected request. The agency considers a request to be received on the date that the request is perfected.
[79 FR 9423, Feb. 19, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 22946, May 21, 2019]
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shiner International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), XueZhu Xu, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:      June 2, 2011
By:
/s/ XueZhu XuName: XueZhu XuTitle: Interim Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 36

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40870

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARMANDO SILVESTRE RAMIREZ-ROJAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1562-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Silvestre 

Ramirez-Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Rojas filed an untimely 

document styled as a “notice of appeal” which we construe as a motion for leave 

to file a late response and as a response (which contained a list of untranslated 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40870 Document: 00512599159 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40870

concerns in Spanish and others in English). We GRANT the motion for leave. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Ramirez-Rojas’s document. To the extent that 

Ramirez-Rojas is attempting to raise a challenge of ineffective assistance of 

counsel, we conclude that the record is insufficiently developed to address 

these claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 

1091 (5th Cir. 2006). We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40870 Document: 00512599159 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) of North American Energy Partners Inc. (the Company), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 2, 2011



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ RODNEY J. RUSTON                                               
|Name: Rodney J. Ruston Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0107

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM087AD

747-53A2563, R3 --- 6/11/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 266 ) ll-K - (I ) -7 9 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:57

AM Sheet 266 of 325P. 2 Tr II-K-(I)-7 9

PUBLICATION

534 : DEPRECIATIO N Departmen t o f Treasury/Interna l Revenu e Servic e Novembe r 198 2 THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M 

### II-K-d^rj j
§ 1610.4 Prohibitions on the use of non-LSC funds. ( a ) *Non-LSC funds.* Non-LSC funds may not be used by recipients for restricted activities as described in this section, subject to the exceptions in §§ 1610.5 and 1610.6 of this part.
( b ) *Extended restrictions.* The extended restrictions apply to the following uses of non-LSC funds: ( 1 ) Private funds—any use of private funds;
( 2 ) Public funds—any use of public funds; and
( 3 ) Tribal funds—any unauthorized use of tribal funds.
( c ) *Standard restrictions.* The standard restrictions apply to the following uses of non-LSC funds: ( 1 ) Private funds—any use of private funds;
( 2 ) Public funds—any unauthorized use of public funds; and
( 3 ) Tribal funds—any unauthorized use of tribal funds.
( d ) *Limited restrictions.* The limited restrictions do not apply to the use of non-LSC funds.
( e ) *Other restrictions.* The other restrictions apply to non-LSC funds as provided in the referenced regulations. This part neither expands nor limits those requirements.
( f ) *Inapplicability to part 1611—financial eligibility.* This part does not expand, limit, or otherwise apply to the financial eligibility rules of 45 CFR part 1611.