alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ICRAS 1413 1845
- 0038 v 11

– Affected Public

– For
- Profit Institutions 8 / 5 /2013

**Student Assistance General Provisions**

**– Subpart K** 

**– Cash Management**  This request is for a revision to the current information collection 1845

- 0038 that is expiring. This collection pertains to the recordkeeping requirements contained in the regulations r elated to the administration of the Subpart K

- Cash Management section of the Student Assistance General Provisions. The regulatory language has not changed. These program regulations are designed to provide benefits to borrowers, and protect the taxpayers' interest. The information collection requirements in these regulations are necessary to provide students with required information about their eligibility to receive funding under the federal student financial aid programs and to prevent fraud and ab use of program funds b y allowing students to reduce or reject aid being offered as well as being made aware of when such funding can be expected to be available. 34 CFR 668.163

– Maintaining and accounting for funds

– identifies how institution’s accounts into which federal student aid funds are to be established and maintained. It also identifies how institutional accounting and internal controls are to be maintained. The Department will increase the number of respondents to more accuratel y reflect the number of participating institutions, both domestic and foreign. Section T otal Respon dents 2, 205 Respon ses 2, 205 Burden Hours 2 , 71 6 34 CFR 668.165

– Notices and authorizations

– requires that institution’s provide their federal student aid recipie nts with information about how much aid the recipient can expect to receive, when the aid will be available, provide the recipients the option of decreasing or eliminating loan or TEACH Grant funding if desired, and receive affirmative confirmation from th e recipient of the accepted aid. Additionally , the institution must allow for a recipient to elect to have the institution hold aid funds and allow for the recipient to change that authorization at any time in writing. Section T otal Respon dents 2,205 Respon ses 3,030,000 Burden Hours 90,900 TOTAL S Respon dents 2 , 205 unduplicated institutions Respon ses 3,032, 205 Burden Hours 93, 61 6
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                  |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ David Rector                                                                      |   |
|   | Name:  | David Rector                                                                          |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) |   |
|   | Date:  | April 15, 2011                                                                        |   |

----
**Exhibit
31.2**








**CERTIFICATIONS**





I, James
A. Morlan, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViewSonic
Corporation;





2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date: May
13,
2005








/s/
James A.
Morlan


James A.
Morlan


Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,908
<PP&E>                                           2,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,667
<SALES>                                          9,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,902
<CGS>                                            2,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 1633.4 Recipient policies, procedures and recordkeeping.

Each recipient shall adopt written policies and procedures to guide its staff in complying with this part and shall maintain records sufficient to document the recipient's compliance with this part.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, James Chu, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViewSonic Corporation;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:                                    | August 12, 2004 |   |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| /s/ James Chu                            |            |
| James Chu                                |
| *Chairman of the Board of Directors and* |
| *Chief Executive Officer*                |

 

----
Case 1:21-cv-01665-TJK Document 21 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

END CITIZENS UNITED, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 21-1665 (TJK) 

)

 v. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ) STATUS REPORT 

)

 Defendant. ) 

) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S 

STATUS REPORT 

The Commission hereby provides this status report pursuant to the Court’s November 7, 

2023, Minute Order. On Wednesday, November 1, 2023, the Commission held a series of votes 

in the remanded matter, MUR 7609R. The Commission failed by a vote of 3-2 to, inter alia, find 

reason to believe that Make America Great Again PAC f/k/a Donald J. Trump for President and 

Bradley T. Crate in his official capacity as treasurer violated 52 U.S.C. 30125(e) and 11 C.F.R. § 

300.61 by soliciting soft money. A vote to, inter alia, dismiss that same allegation under Heckler 

v. Chaney then failed by a vote of 2-3. Finally, the Commission decided by a vote of 5-0 to close 

the file and issue appropriate letters. One Commissioner was recused from each of the above 

votes. 

On the same day as the above-referenced votes, i.e. November 1, 2023, the two 

Commissioners who had voted in favor of dismissal and against reason to believe violations 

occurred submitted a statement of reasons explaining their views for the customary internal 48-

hour circulation period. This period enables staff to review statements for confidential and/or 

privileged material. Following the completion of the review period, notification letters 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:21-cv-01665-TJK Document 21 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 2 

regarding the Commission votes and the statement of reasons were sent to the administrative 

complainants and respondents on Monday, November 6, 2023. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) 

Acting General Counsel 

lstevenson@fec.gov

 /s/ Kevin Deeley

Kevin Deeley 

Associate General Counsel 

kdeeley@fec.gov

 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

1050 First Street NE 

Washington, DC 20463 

(202) 694-1650 

November 13, 2023 

2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 20, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 20, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0281. STACIE MALONE v. CF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19CI01448
J-S59030- 14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ELI NASSAR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.

STEVE ATUAHENE Appellant No. 730 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Order January 14 , 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Civil Division at No(s): July 2013 No. 2330

BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., LAZARUS, J., and STRASSBURGER, J. * MEMORANDUM BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 Steve Atuahene appeals from the January 14, 2014 or der of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying his pe tition to strike foreign judgment. 1 For the following reasons, we quash the appeal. Atuahene filed a timely notice of appeal on Februar y 24, 2014. By order dated February 24, 2014, the trial court direct ed Atuahene to file a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal pursua nt to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) within 21 days after entry of the order. 2 Atuahene timely filed the statement on March 17, 2014. However, he failed to serve the trial court

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1 The order was entered on the docket on January 24, 2 014.

2 The order was entered on the docket on February 25, 2014.J-S59030- 14

- 2 -

with the statement in a timely manner as evidenced by the envelope bearing a March 20, 2014 postmark in which he mailed the Rule 1925(b) statement to the trial judge. The failure to serve the Rule 1 925(b) statement on the

trial court within the allotted time results in waiver of all issues on appeal.

See Forest Highlands Community Ass’n v. Hammer , 879 A.2d 223 (Pa. Super. 2005) (where appellant filed concise statement with trial court, but did not serve judge, all issues waived). Appeal quashed. SHOGAN, J., joins the majority. STRASSBURGER, J., files a Dissenting Memorandum. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 9/16/2014
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2009



|                                                                                                                                                      |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                                |  | 
|Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial
Services, LLC (Managing Member) |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

.
§ 2551.53 Under what circumstances may a Senior Companion be removed from service? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70542 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) A sponsor may remove a Senior Companion from service for cause. Grounds for removal include, but are not limited to: Extensive and unauthorized absences; misconduct; failure to perform assignments or failure to accept supervision. A Senior Companion may also be removed from stipended service for having income in excess of the eligibility level. A Senior Companion shall be removed immediately if ineligible to serve based on criminal history check results.
( b ) The sponsor shall establish appropriate policies on removal from service, as well as procedures for appeal.
[83 FR 64647, Dec. 17, 2018]
§ 1080.6 Funding of alternative organizations. ( a ) If a State does not apply for or submits an approvable application for a grant under the Emergency Community Services Homeless Grant Program, the Secretary shall use the amounts that would have been allocated to that State to make grants to agencies and organizations in the State that meet the requirements of § 1080.5(b)(1).
( b ) The amounts allocated under this section in any fiscal year shall be awarded to eligible agencies and organizations in the same proportion as funds distributed to those agencies and organizations by the State for the previous fiscal year under the Community Services Block Grant Program (42 U.S.C. 9904(c)(2)(A)).
( c ) Agencies and organizations eligible to be funded under this section shall submit an application meeting the requirements of §§ 1080.5(a) and 1080.5(b)(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7), at a time specified by the Secretary. If such an agency or organization does not apply for or submit an approvable application under this section, the funds that would have been allocated to them shall be reallocated by the Secretary to the remaining eligible agencies and organizations on a pro rata basis.
[54 FR 6372, Feb. 9, 1989, as amended at 57 FR 27946, June 23, 1992]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 

June 29, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

Patricia Carmona 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Joseph F. Stoltz 

Assistant StaffDirector 

Lawrence L. Calvert, Jr. 

Associate General Counsel 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

For Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Jennifer Waldman JJ-^ 

Paralegal ^ i/ 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on Ohio Republican Party State Central & Executive 

Committee (LRA #828) 

The Office of General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report on the Ohio 

Republican Party State Central & Executive Committee. We concur with the finding (Reporting 

of Debts and Obligations) in the Draft Report.' If you have any questions, please contact 

Jennifer Waldman, the paralegal assigned to this audit. 

cc: Christopher Hughey, Acting General Counsel 

We recommend that the Commission consider this document m open session.
§ 2516.310 May private school students participate? ( a ) Yes. To the extent consistent with the number of students in the State or Indian tribe or in the school district of the LEA involved who are enrolled in private nonprofit elementary or secondary schools, the State, Indian tribe, or LEA must (after consultation with appropriate private school representatives) make provision— ( 1 ) For the inclusion of services and arrangements for the benefit of those students so as to allow for the equitable participation of the students in the programs under this part; and
( 2 ) For the training of the teachers of those students so as to allow for the equitable participation of those teachers in the programs under this part.
( b ) If a State, Indian tribe, or LEA is prohibited by law from providing for the participation of students or teachers from private nonprofit schools as required by paragraph (a) of this section, or if the Corporation determines that a State, Indian tribe, or LEA substantially fails or is unwilling to provide for their participation on an equitable basis, the Corporation will waive those requirements and arrange for the provision of services to the students and teachers.
[59 FR 13786, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 74 FR 46504, Sept. 10, 2009]