alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA, J an u ary 1 8 , 2 0 2 4

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 D0 19 8

. KENNETH LARUE ET A L. v

. METROPO L I S I N VESTMENTS,

LLC.

Up o n c o nsid eratio n o f the A p p lic atio n f o r D isc retio nary A p p eal, it is o rd ered

that is be hereby GRA N TED

. The ap p e llants may f ile a N o tic e o f Ap p eal within 1 0

d ays o f the d at e o f t his o rd e r. The Clerk o f Su p erio r Co u rt is d irec ted to inc lu d e a

c o p y o f t his o rd e r in the rec o rd transmitted to the Co u r t o f A p p eals. Resp ond ent’ s

requ est f o r a legislativ e stay is d enied as mo ot.

LC N UM B ER:

22- A

- 1 0346

- 5

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

, 1 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 4

I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

.
Order 2013

- 10

- 7

Served: October, 18, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 31 st day of July , 2013

In the matter of the revocation of the certificate

authority issued to

BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC

d/b/a USA AIRLINES 3000

pursuant to the provisions of 14 CFR § 204.7 Docket DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 8030

DOT

- OST

- 2007

- 27790

ORDER REVOKING FORE I GN CERTIFICATE

By Order 2013

- 7

- 23 , issued July 31, 2013 , we revoked the interstate certificate of public

convenience and necessity issued to Brendan Airways, LLC d/b/a USA 3000 Airlines by Order

2001

- 12

- 22

.

By this order, we are revoking the company’s companion foreign certificate authority. Instead of

r epeating our findings and conclusions in Order 2013

- 7

- 2 3 , we incorporate them here by

reference.

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We revoke the certificate s of public convenience and necessity issued to Brendan Airways,

LLC d/b/a USA 3000 Airlines by Order 2001

- 12

- 22 and Order 2007

- 7

- 3 , authorizing it to

engage in foreign air transportation

.

2. Unless disapproved by the President of the United States under section 41307 of Title 49 of

the United States Code, this order shall become effective on the 61 st day after its submission for

section 41307 review or upon the date of receipt of advice from the President or his designee

under Executive Order 12597 and implementing regulations that he or she does not intend to

disapprove the Department's order under that section, w hichever occurs earlier. 1

1 This order was submitted for section 41307 review on July 31, 2013

. The 61 st day is September 30, 2013

. Since the President or his designee did not disapprove this order before that date, it became effective o n September

30, 2013.

U N

I T E D S

T A T E S O F A

M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T

I O

N2

3. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.govATTACHMENT A

SERVICE LIST FOR

BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC

PETER LYNCH AGC

- 300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR

ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591 MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE, SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

WILLIAM CHADWICK

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
Order entered October 25, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00738
- CR
BARRY LAKEITH GRIGSB Y, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 19 4th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15
- 75554
- M



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 23, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed o n or before November 25, 2019 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by November 25, 2019, this appeal may be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, David Rector, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nano Holdings
International, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Nano Holdings International, Inc..






Dated: April 7,
2008






By:         /s/ David
Rector


David Rector


Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.,


c/o
      Global Commercial Real Estate


4
      World
      Financial Center, 16 th Floor


250
      Vesey
      Street, New York, New York 10080








Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of August 1, 2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wachovia Bank,
      National Association, as Master Servicer No. 1, Prudential Asset Resources,
      Inc.
      as Master Servicer No. 2, J.E. Robert Company, Inc., as Special Servicer, and
      LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to Merrill Lynch
      Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
      2006-C2.





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
#### § 1641.16 Removal.

Removed IPAs are prohibited from performing audit services in subsequent years under an existing contract(s) with one or more specific recipients. The affected recipient(s) shall not extend existing contracts with such IPAs. Removed IPAs also are prohibited from providing audit services to the affected recipient(s) as agents or representatives of other IPAs, and are required to provide prior written notice to the debarring official before providing such services to other recipients. Removed IPAs also must provide prior written notice of the removal to any such recipient.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

LAUREN FENENBOCK,

Relator. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00248

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against the

Honorable Eduardo Gamboa, Judge of the Probate Court No. 2 of El Paso County, Texas, and

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditi onally granted. We therefore

order the trial court to enter an order disqualifying Rene Ordonez from representing Glenna Gabby in

cause number 2017

- CPR00674 arising from Probate Court No. 2 of El Paso County, Texas, in

accordance with the opinion of this Court. The writ of mandamus will not issue unless Respondent

fails to comply with this opinion within a reasonable period of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2











IMPLANT
SCIENCES CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation (the
"Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane J.
Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/Diane J.
Ryan


Diane J.
Ryan


Chief
Financial Officer


May 20,
2008
#### § 153.600 [Reserved]
#### Catherine Creedon, Respondent, *v.*Knights of the Maccabees of the World, Appellant.

*Greedon*v. *Knights of Maccabees,*122 App. Div. 895, affirmed.

(Argued February 26, 1909;

decided March 16, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 5, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a certificate of life insurance.

*George P. Keating*for appellant.

*W. Smith O' Brien*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN MARK BYNES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1914

[August 3, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, 

Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 08 19339 CF10A.

John Mark Bynes, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Hillsborough,

No. 5500.

#### Sheldon Elliott *v.*Clyde Garfield Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.

Submitted June 8, 1966.

Decided August 31, 1966.

*Jerome L. Silverstein*for the plaintiff, filed no brief.

*Sullivan, Gregg & Horton*for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

This is an action in contract wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover commissions on sales of automobiles from the defendant. Trial by the Court resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff.

During the trial the defendant took certain exceptions to the exclusion and admission of evidence, to the denial of its motions for a nonsuit and to set aside the verdict at the conclusion of the trial. The questions of law raised by the evidence and the rulings of the Court were reserved and transferred by *Grimes,*J.

The basic facts are simple and are not in serious dispute. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as an automobile salesman from August 1964 to April 1965. He was to be paid a salary of $40 per week plus a commission of four per cent on the sale of a used car; $75 for the sale of a Cadillac and $35 for an Oldsmobile.

Sometime after the plaintiff terminated his employment with the defendant, two Cadillac cars for which he had taken orders *364were delivered. The only issue before us is the defendant’s contention that the plaintiff is not entitled to a commission on cars delivered after he left its employ.

The defendant offered evidence that it was a custom in the automobile sales business that a salesman would be paid his commission only on delivery of the vehicle and that if he had left his employment before delivery he would not be entitled to a commission. Further the defendant contends that when plaintiff severed his employment he was given a check for $22.15 on which was typed “Payment in full and final.”

In answer to the first contention the plaintiff testified that he had an agreement that he would receive a salary plus commission on the sale of cars. He denied that there was an agreement that he would not receive a commission on cars which he had sold during his employment but which were not delivered until after he left his employment. Furthermore the defendant’s sales manager testified that the plaintiff, on his first job as an automobile salesman, was not told of the alleged custom until after he severed his employment with the defendant.

In this state of the evidence the Court could find that the plaintiff was entided to a commission on cars delivered after the termination of his employment. It was a question of fact for the Trial Court to determine whether the check for $22.15 was accepted in full payment for salary due at the time or for all obligations then due or thereafter to become due including commissions on cars later delivered. *Corey Steeplejacks Co.*v. Cray, 106 N. H. 126; *Kramas*v. Beattie, 107 N. H. 321.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

All concurred.
§ 1703.207 Change in meeting plans after public announcement. ( a ) Following public announcement of a meeting, the time or place of a meeting may be changed only if the change is announced publicly at the earliest practicable time.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

CORRECTED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-60377

Summary Calendar

__________________

JUAN CARLOS CANAS,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

______________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A70 566 443

______________________________________________

March 17, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Carlos Canas seeks to appeal the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ denial of his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial

of Canas’s motion to reopen deportation proceedings. Canas was

ordered deported following an in abstentia deportation proceeding.
2

Deportation orders following such proceedings may be rescinded only

if the alien shows exceptional circumstances for his failure to

appear, shows that he did not receive notice of the hearing, or

shows that he was in federal or state custody and did not appear at

the hearing through no fault of his own. 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3).

Canas failed to meet any of these requirements and, therefore, was

not entitled to have the in absentia deportation order rescinded.

Canas’s argument that he did not attend the hearing due to a dental

emergency does not meet the exceptional circumstances standard,

since no evidence was presented to establish that such an emergency

existed. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2). Canas’s petition for review

is DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xzeres,
Corp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



| | i.  | The Quarterly
                           Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2012 (the “Report”)
                           fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | ii. | The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                



|Date: October
    15, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Frank Greco                                                              
|-------------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           | Name:  | Frank Greco                                                                  
|                           | Title: | Chief
        Executive Officer
        (Principal
        Executive Officer)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 913 

To make Ecuador eligible for designation as a beneficiary country under 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2023 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To make Ecuador eligible for designation as a beneficiary 

country under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Innovation and Devel5 opment in Ecuador Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 913 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF ECUADOR FOR DESIGNATION AS A 

2 BENEFICIARY COUNTRY UNDER CARIBBEAN 

3 BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT. 

4 Section 212(b) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Re5 covery Act (19 U.S.C. 2702(b)) is amended by inserting 

6 after ‘‘Dominica’’ the following new item: 

7 ‘‘Ecuador’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Roger P. DeschenesRoger P. DeschenesVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 14, 2011










This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of RecycleNet and subsidiaries, (the Company) on 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Rick Ivanovick Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|July 30, 2004 | /s/  Rick Ivanovick    
|------------- | -----------------------
|              | Rick Ivanovick         
|              | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|  

/s/ Glenn D. Bolduc

 

Glenn D. Bolduc

 

President, Chief Executive Officer 

Date: November 14, 2013

 

This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|