1 SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR STANDARD FORM 83

- I PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION 1(a) TIT LE AND NUMBER OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION Alternative Affirmative Defense Requirements for Ultra

- low Sulfur Diese l

. The current OMB control number is 2060

- NEW. The EPA number for this proposed ICR is 2364.01. The docket number for the direct final rule related to this information collection is EPA

- HQ

- OAR

2007

- 1158
. The Regulatory I dentification Number (RIN) for the direct final rule related to this information collection is 2060

- AO71. (b) SHORT CHARACTERIZATION/ABSTRACT The highway

diesel program regulations require most motor vehicle (highway) diesel fuel sold at retail stations to contain 15 parts per million (ppm) sulfur or less (hereafter referred to as ultra low sulfur diesel fuel, or UL SD) beginning October, 2006. [Recordkeeping and reporting related to diesel fuel regulations for on

- road, non

- road and performance

- based test methods are included in EPA I CR 1718.08 (OMB Control Number 2060

- 0277).] Under the regulation, wh ere a violation of the 15 ppm sulfur standard is identified at a retail outlet, the retailer responsible for dispensing the noncompliant fuel is deemed liable, as well as the refiner(s), imp orter(s) and distributor(s) of such fuel. The highway diesel regulations further provide, however, that any person deemed liable can rebut this presumption by establishing an affirmative defense that includes, among other things, showing that it conducted a quality assurance sampling and testing program as prescribed by the regulations. This proposed ICR covers burdens and costs associated with a direct final rule which would allow refiners and importers of ULSD an alternative means of meeting the affirmat ive defense requirements in the diesel sulfur regulations by participating in a nationwide diesel fuel sampling and testing program. This program would result in lower overall compliance costs for nearl y all affected parties and the survey

would be carrie d out by

independent survey or funded by industry . The reporting burden covered by this proposed ICR related to reports that refiners, importers and distributors, have to submit in the event of a non

- complying sulfur test result. The direct final rule af

fects the regulations at 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 80.613. The authorit y citation for the direct final rule and the association information collection is for the following Clean Air Act sections: 42 United States Code §§ 7414, 7542, 7545, and 7601 (a). 2. NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION (a) NEED/AUTHORITY FOR THE COLLECTION The basic need and authority for the collection of information have been established in2

the I CR for the highway

diesel final rule. The rule established specific recordke eping and reporting requirements in order to enforce compliance with the 15 ppm sulfur standard for highway diesel fuel. (b) PRACTI CAL UTILITY/USERS OF THE DATA The practical utility

and use of the collection of information related to highway diesel fuel have been established in the I CR for the highway diesel final rule. The Federal Register notice for the direct final rule describes in greater detail the information collection activities related to establishing an alternative defense in the event of a vi olation of the 15 ppm sulfur standard for highway

diesel fuel. In general, the direct final rule is designed to grant flexibility to refiners and importers by permitting them to conduct activities normally conducted on a facility basis on a nationwide bas is. The associated information collection is designed to monitor compliance on a nationwide basis. The EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance and EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality , will be the go vernmental users of the information contained in this proposed information collection. 3. NONDUPLICATION, CONSUL TATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRI TERIA (a) NONDUPLICATION This proposed I CR is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise re asonabl y accessible to the Agency . Wherever possible, we have designed the proposed regulation to make sure that there is no unnecessary duplication. Many

recordkeeping activities are already conducted as part of customary business practice (CBP). (b ) PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ICR SUBMI SSI ON TO OMB The proposed ICR changes are included in the direct final rule. A copy of the direct final rule and an accompan yi ng notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on the same day

ar e available in the docket. We are handling this action as a direct final rule, because we do not expect adverse comment. If adverse comment is received, we will withdraw the direct final rule and consider an y comment(s) received prior to issuing a final rule. (c) CONSULTAT IONS Industry was consulted in making the assumptions related to the original information collection burden and in developing the NPRM and the additional information requirements that this proposed I CR are based on. We are seeking further industry comment via this supporting statement and encourage all interest parties to submit comments to us. (d) EFFECTS OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION3

Less frequent reporting would make discovery and correction of violations take too long to discove r from the date of violation, and would give non

- complying parties a competitive advantage for long periods of time. A lesser recordkeeping burden would make verification of compliance extremel y difficult. (e) GENERAL GUIDELINES The general guidelines for the collection of information pursuant to the highway diesel rule are approved in the ICR for the final highway diesel rule. The record retention requirements specified is five (5) ye ars. This proposed I CR also specifies five (5) y ears as the retenti on period. (f) CONFIDENTIALITY AND SENSITIVE QUESTI ONS (i) Confidentiality Any information submitted to EPA for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to EPA regulations at 40 C.F.R. 2.201 etc. seq. (ii) Sensitive Qu estions This section is not applicable as this proposed ICR does not involve matters of a sensitive nature. 4. THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED (a) RESPONDENTS/NAICS and SIC CODES Recordkeeping and, in some cases, reporting affects the fol lowing respondents: petroleum refiners (2911), pipelines (4613), diesel fuel marketers and distributors (5171 and 5172), diesel fuel carriers (4212 and 4213) and terminals (4226). Many recordkeeping activities are alread y performed in the normal course of business (CBP). (b) INFORMATION REQUESTED (i) Data Items, Including Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Knowledge of the following definitions at 40 CFR 80.2 is important for a thorough understanding of the reporting and recordkeeping requirem ents: “Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel” means an y diesel fuel or other distillate fuel sold in any State (State means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Is lands) that is used,4

intended for use in, or made available for use in for use in motor vehicles or motor vehicle engines. “Refiner” means an y person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises a refinery

. “Importer” means a person who imports diesel fuel from a foreign country into the United States (including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands). There is a new respondent burden associated with refiners, importers and distributo rs preparing a report for EPA explaining the circumstances behind and root causes for an y noncompliant UL SD samples. There is also an Agency burden associated with reviewing each report. This burden is estimated below under “ ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COS T OF THE COLLECTION ”. The following sections describe respondent and Agency activities. (ii) Respondent Activities The following are required:

 Read and comprehend the regulations.  Train personnel to meet the requirements, employing new technologies if warranted.  Develop the information that is not alread y available.  Gather and organize the information.  Review the information, perform qualit y assurance, and take corrective action, if necessary , to meet the regulatory

requirements.  Report the informat ion to EPA, as specified in the regulations. 5. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED

-- AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (a) AGENCY ACTIVITIES The following are required:

 Develop a thorough understanding of the regulatory requ irements. Prepare guidance documents and forms.  Convey

the requirements in a manner that is understandable. Emphasize the benefits of submitting data electronically

.  Respond to inquiries.  Provide access to the regulations and guidance documents.  Review the submitted information prior to data entry for compliance with submission requirements.5

 Contact the respondent when the information has not been submitted properly and provide guidance on correction of the problem.  Maintain and refine hardware and software s ys tems for handling confidential data via hard copy and electronicall y.  Administer a contract for data entry

.  Input information into databases and store the information.  Perform data anal ys is and identify violations. (b) COLLECTION METHODOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT The information collection has been developed b y EPA offices that have planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a mann er which will enhance the utility of the information for the Agency and the public. The information collection, to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality , Agency

efficiency , and re sponsiveness to the public. The information is carefully reviewed for compliance with the requirements. Most of the information submitted to the Agency under the diesel sulfur program is claimed as business confidential (CBI). It is stored in a secure area and on secure databases. No changes to the collection methodologies in the existing I CR for the diesel rule are anticipated as a result of this proposed I CR modification. (c) SMALL BUSINESS FLEXIBILITY This proposed rule will grant flexibility to al l affected parties, regardless of size. (d) COLLECTION SCHEDULE There is no change in collection schedules relative to the I CR for the diesel rule as a result of this proposed ICR modification. 6. ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION (a) ESTIMATING THE RESPONDENT BURDEN We drew upon consultation with industry and our own experience implementing similar regulations among the same or similar entities to develop estimates of the burden associated with this modification. (b) ESTIMATING THE RESPONDENT COST Three labor categories are involved: managerial (includes legal and professional review),6

technical, and clerical. The estimates use Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Employ er Costs for Employ ee Compensation

- Table 12

- Private Industry , Manufacturing, and Non

- Manufacturing Industries b y Occupational Group (December 2003), with a 3% inflation factor applied to bring the values to present dollars. Using this method, the following wages and benefits appl y b y category : Wages and Benefits Mana gerial $53.87 per hour Technical $35.29 per hour Clerical $24.56 per hour Doubling for compan y overhead bey ond wages and benefits, and for convenience, rounding up to the dollar, gives the following rates for this I CR: Total Employ er Cost Managerial $1 08 per hour Technical $71 per hour Clerical $49 per hour The labor mix for the activities estimated will be about the same for each and is consistent with prior I CRs in this series. It is assumed that for each hour of activity the mix will be about 0.1 h our managerial, 0.7 hour technical, and 0.2 hour clerical. This gives an average labor cost of $71 per hour, which will be used in this I CR modification. "Purchased services" relates to the survey related to sampling diesel fuel at retail outlets , which would be conducted by an outside survey or hired by industry

. There are no capital/start

up costs associated with this I CR. (c ) ESTIMATING THE RESPONDENT UNIVERSE We were able to estimate the number of regulated entities by drawing upon our experience regulating the same entities. Respondents for this action may include refiners, importers, and distributors. Based on history and enforcement experience, we expect that approximately

20 instances of non

- compliance will result in 20 reports to be submitte d each ye ar. Annual Respondent Burden Hours & Costs (Including Non - Postage "Other Costs") Collection Activity # of

Respondents # of Re ports per

Respondent Total # of

Re ports # of Hours

per Report Total

Hours7

Submit report for each exceedance 2 0 1 20 16 320
The estimated respondent burden for reviewing each report for a noncompliant sample is 16 hours, or $1,136 per response, so the total respondent burden for evaluating 20 reports per ye ar would be $22,270. (d ) ESTIMATING AGENCY BURDEN AND COST The annual Agency

burden is determined using the 2009 OPM hourly pay table applicable for the Washington DC area, 1 with values multiplied by 1.6, the standard government benefits multiplier. The hourly

wage rates are as follows, rounded up to the ne arest five dollars: EPA Manager (GS

- 15, step one) = $93 Technical Staff (GS

- 13, step one) = $67 Clerical Staff (GS

- 5, step one) = $26 The total annual Agency

burden hours are estimated as follows: Activity # of

Responses Manager

Hours per Response Tec hnical

Hours per Response Clerical

Hours per Response Total

Agency Hours Review report for each exceedance 20 0 2 0 40
Based on historical experience, we expect to find approximately 20 noncompliant samples per ye ar. The estimated Agency burden for rev iewing each report for a noncompliant sample is 2 hours, or $134 per response, so the total Agency burden for evaluating 20 reports per ye ar would be $2,680. (e) BOTTOM LINE BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS The annual estimates in burden hours and costs associated with this rule are as follows:

1 See “Salary Table 2009

– DCB,” US Office of Personnel Management, accessed July 16, 2009 at http://www.opm.gov/oca/09tables/html/dcb.asp

.8

TOTALS FROM THE TABLE S : TOTAL NO. OF REPORTS: 20 TOTAL BURDEN HOURS: 360 TOTAL COST: $24,950 (f) REASON FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN The proposed change in burden is due to issuance of a regulation affecting sampling and t esting requirements for UL SD sold at retail stations. (g) BURDEN STATEMENT The average respondent burden in hours per response for this I CR is estimated at 16 hours

. The average Agency burden in hours per response for this ICR is estimated at 2 hours. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, insta ll, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to comply with an y previously

applicabl e instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a currently

valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency 's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this and comme nts may

be submitted to the attention of this docket number : EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2007

- 1158
. Also, y ou can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA. Please include the docket number in an y correspondence.
B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATI STI CALMETHODS This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in the data collection associated with the dies el fuel regulations.