alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:22-cv-01976-JEB Document 17 Filed 12/08/22 Page 1 of 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. 22-1976 (JEB) 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court 

ORDERS that: 

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and 

2. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

/s/ James E. Boasberg 

JAMES E. BOASBERG 

United States District Judge 

Date: December 8, 2022 

1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 25, 2020

b 0324 p 

# Order

Clerk March 25, 2020

159531

LEOLA ROBERTSON, Personal Representative

of the ESTATE OF MARTEL ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159531

COA: 337961

Wayne CC: 15

- 010455

- NI

LADARIUS DEANGELO JOHNSON,

Defendant,

and

U

- HAUL CO. OF MICHIGAN, a/k/a 2013

U

- HAUL TITLING 1, LLC,

Defendan t

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu

of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the jud gment of the Court of Appeals. Whether

the plaintiff has stated a viable claim against defendant U

- Haul Co. of Michigan (U

- Haul),

and if so the basis for that claim, cannot be reviewed on appeal where the complaint itself

fails to make an y allegations or state any claim against U

- Haul

. Under these circumstances,

U

- Haul was en titled to summary disposition. See MCR 2.116(C)(8), (I)(1). We therefore

REVERSE the April 10, 2017 judgment of the Wayne Circuit Court and REMAND this

case to that court for entry of an order granting summary disposition to U

- Haul, without

prejudice to the plaintiff’s opportunity to amend the complai nt pursuant to

MCR 2.116(I)(5).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
2020 COPS Office Community Policing Development Microgrants Program Awards 

State and Recipient Award Amount

Alabama

Cherokee County Sheriff’s Department

Cherokee County Youth Engagement Project 

$15,090

Arizona

Flagstaff Police Department

Flagstaff Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$88,770

Phoenix, City of

Phoenix Youth Engagement Project

$88,516

California

Chula Vista, City of

Chula Vista Human Trafficking Project

$97,500

Florida

Flagler County Sheriff's Office

Flagler County Recruitment, Hiring, and Retention Project 

$92,501

Orlando, City of

Orlando Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$16,800

Pinellas County

Pinellas Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$90,870

Port St. Lucie, City of

Port St. Lucie Youth Engagement Project

$98,175

Kentucky

Office of the Attorney General

State of Kentucky Human Trafficking Project

$100,000

Louisiana

Louisiana State University and A&M College

Louisiana State University and A&M College School Safety Project

$88,229

Nevada

Douglas County Sheriff's Department

Douglas County Victim-Centered Approaches Project

$55,062
Page 2 of 3

New Jersey

Howell, Township of

Howell Township Youth Engagement Project

$93,357

New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety

New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$34,350

New Mexico

Bloomfield Police Department

Bloomfield Youth Engagement Project

$78,328

New York

Chemung County

Chemung County Violent Crime Project

$99,924

North Carolina

North Carolina Department of Public Safety

North Carolina Department of Public Safety Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$99,850

North Dakota

Cass County Sheriff’s Department

Cass County Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$94,125

Ohio

Dayton, City of

Dayton Violent Crime Project

$100,000

Mentor, City of

Mentor Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$33,906

Rhode Island

Narragansett Police Department

Narragansett Crisis Intervention Training Project

$99,993

Tennessee

Gallatin Police Department

Gallatin Staffing and Allocation Studies Project

$92,017

Texas

Dallas, City of

Dallas Violent Crime Project

$100,000

Frisco, City of

Frisco Staffing and Allocation Studies Project

$48,750

Harris, County of

Harris County Youth Engagement Project

$83,291

Utah

Salt Lake, City of

Salt Lake City Youth Engagement Project

$71,896
Page 3 of 3

Virginia

Danville Police Department

Danville Victim-Centered Approaches Project

$91,550

Virginia Department of State Police

Virginia Department of State Police Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$83,137

West Virginia

Montgomery Police Department

Montgomery Community Engagement Project

$27,741

Wisconsin

Door County Sheriff's Department

Door County Officer Safety and Wellness Project

$30,000

TOTAL FUNDING AWARDED: $2,193,728
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Highway Administration relating to ‘‘Waiver 

of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Highway Administration relating to ‘‘Waiver of Buy 

5 America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers’’ (88 

6 Fed. Reg. 10619 (February 21, 2023)), and such rule 

7 shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate November 8, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapquirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers’’. tion relating to ‘‘Waiver of Buy America Re- submitted by the Federal Highway Administra- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
#### Gummert v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

July 15, 1914:

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This case presents only the same questions which were considered in the case of Carson N. Reed v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 83, and for the reasons there stated the judgment is affirmed.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 11 

Designating the week of January 22 through January 28, 2023, as ‘‘National 

School Choice Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

DAINES, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HAGERTY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. JOHNSON, 

Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT

of Florida, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. YOUNG, and 

Mr. BUDD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of January 22 through January 28, 

2023, as ‘‘National School Choice Week’’. 

Whereas providing a diversity of choices in K–12 education 

empowers parents to select education environments that 

meet the individual needs and strengths of their children; 

Whereas high-quality K–12 education environments of all varieties are available in the United States, including traditional public schools, public charter schools, public magnet schools, private schools, online academies, and home 

schooling; 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 11 IS 

Whereas talented teachers and school leaders in each of the 

education environments prepare children to achieve their 

dreams; 

Whereas more families than ever before in the United States 

actively choose the best education for their children; 

Whereas more public awareness of the issue of parental 

choice in education can inform additional families of the 

benefits of proactively choosing challenging, motivating, 

and effective education environments for their children; 

Whereas the process by which parents choose schools for 

their children is nonpolitical, nonpartisan, and deserves 

the utmost respect; and 

Whereas tens of thousands of events are planned to celebrate 

the benefits of educational choice during the 13th annual 

National School Choice Week, held the week of January 

22 through January 28, 2023: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of January 22 through 

3 January 28, 2023, as ‘‘National School Choice 

4 Week’’; 

5 (2) congratulates students, parents, teachers, 

6 and school leaders from kindergarten through grade 

7 12 education environments of all varieties for their 

8 persistence, achievements, dedication, and contribu9 tions to society in the United States; 

10 (3) encourages all parents, during National 

11 School Choice Week, to learn more about the edu12 cation options available to them; and 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 11 IS 

1 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to hold appropriate programs, events, and activities 

3 during National School Choice Week to raise public 

4 awareness of the benefits of opportunity in edu5 cation. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOHN FERNSTROM,

Plaintiff Below, Appellant,

v.

ELLIS POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., VICTOR TRUNZO, EUGENE CASTELLUCCI, JAMES DAUTENHAM, PETER DEANGELIS, GARY OWENS, and DAVID WEIDMAN,

Defendants Below, Appellees. § § § No. 209, 2018 § § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2017-0518 § § § § § § § § §

Submitted: October 5, 2018 Decided: November 30, 2018

Before VAUGHN

, SEITZ

, and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the partie s’ briefs and the record on appeal, we

conclude that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis

of, and for the reasons assigned in, the Court of Chancery’s March 28, 2018 bench

ruling adopting the Master’s December 5, 2017 Final Report. 1

1 Fernstrom v. Trunzo , 2017 WL 6028871 (Del. Ch. Dec. 5, 2017).2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
Justice
<PAGE>

            EXHIBIT (15) LETTER RE: UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Board of Directors and Shareholder
Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.

     We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-4 Nos. 333-43005 and 333-83117) of Park-Ohio Industries,
Inc., for the registration of its 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 of
our report dated May 13, 2002 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements of Park-Ohio Industries Inc., which are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.

                                          /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
May 14, 2002

                                        19
Exhibit 12(ii)**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Dr. Michael Majerus, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F (as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto) ofQimonda AG (the “Company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date:March 30, 2007     By: /s/ Dr. Michael Majerus     Dr. Michael Majerus  Chief Financial Officer
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT

                   
This Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement and Amendment No. 4 to Change of
Control Agreement is made as of the 31st day of October, 2000, by and between
Stewart Enterprises, Inc., a Louisiana corporation (the "Company"),
and Ronald H. Patron (the "Employee").


W I T N E S S E T H:


                   
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment Agreement with the Employee
dated as of August 1, 1995, which has been previously amended three times (as
amended, the "Employment Agreement");

                   
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into a Change of Control Agreement with the
Employee dated as of December 5, 1995, which has been previously amended three
times (as amended, the "Change of Control Agreement"); and

                   
WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to an extension of the terms
of the Employment Agreement and the Change of Control Agreement, as set forth
herein.

                   
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Employee
by the Company and the payment of wages, salary and other compensation to
Employee by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective
October 31, 2000;

                   
Section 1.     Except as expressly amended herein, all
of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement and Change of Control
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                   
Section 2.     Article I, Section 2 of the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


  
                Employment Term. The
    term of this Agreement (the "Employment Term") shall commence on
    the Agreement Date and shall continue through October 31, 2001, subject
    to any earlier termination of Employee's status as an employee pursuant to
    this Agreement.

  



                   
Section 3.     Article II, Section 2.1(a) of the Change of Control Agreement is
hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


  
                2.1    
    Employment Term and Capacity after Change of Control. (a) If a Change
    of Control occurs on or before October 31, 2001, then the Employee's
    employment term (the "Employment Term") shall continue through the
    second anniversary of the Change of Control, subject to any earlier
    termination of Employee's status as an employee pursuant to this
    Agreement.

  



                   
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

 

	 	 	STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.By:   /s/ James W.
      McFarland                      

                  James W. McFarland

                 Compensation Committee Chairman

	 	 	 
      EMPLOYEE:

        /s/ Ronald H.
      Patron                                 

                              
      Ronald H. Patron
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Justice and 

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives relating to 

‘‘Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached ‘Stabilizing Braces’ ’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

LEE, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

HAWLEY, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. COTTON, Mrs. 

HYDE-SMITH, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. DAINES, Mr. THUNE, Ms. ERNST, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. VANCE, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BUDD, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. PAUL, 

Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. 

ROUNDS, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. RICKETTS, 

Mrs. CAPITO, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives relating to ‘‘Factoring 

Criteria for Firearms With Attached ‘Stabilizing 

Braces’ ’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 20 IS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De2 partment of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

3 Firearms and Explosives relating to ‘‘Factoring Criteria 

4 for Firearms With Attached ‘Stabilizing Braces’ ’’ (88 

5 Fed. Reg. 6478 (January 31, 2023)), and such rule shall 

6 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael V. Shustek, as the Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Group, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A of Vestin Group, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Group, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Group,Inc. and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinGroup, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Group, Inc.’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluations; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Group, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Group, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, VestinGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Vestin Group, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Group, Inc.’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Group, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Group, Inc.’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2005
/s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. Shustek
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 20038

Civilian noninstitutional population

Number in thousands

30 to 34 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU00024933Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Population Level - 30-34 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:45 PM)
# 2014 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.