alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`
Certification pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Wesley Brumbaugh, Principal Financial Officer of Timberjack Sporting Supplies, Inc. certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timberjack Sporting Supplies, Inc..;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.

[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003];

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:

January 16, 2007

By:

/s/ Wesley Brumbaugh

Wesley Brumbaugh, Principal Financial Officer
`
#### § 1801.16 Closing date for receipt of nominations.

The Foundation announces in its Bulletin of Information and in the Federal Register and posts on its website (*http://www.truman.gov*) the date and address at which the Foundation must receive nominations. Nominations not received by this date at the address specified will not be considered.
In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.

A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review meetings which require their type of expertise.

Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the Announcement of Availability of Funds for Grants regarding Adolescent Family Life (AFL) Research are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. This program is sponsored by the Office of Population Affairs. These discussions are likely to reveal personal information concerning individuals associated with the applications. This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

*SEP Meeting on:*                     Announcement of Availability of Funds for Grants regarding Adolescent Family Life (AFL) Research.                

*Date:*                     December 11, 2006 (Open on December 11 from 8:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. and closed for the remainder of the meeting).                

*Place:*                     John M. Eisenberg Building, AHRQ Conference Center, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.                

*Contact Person:*                     Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Telephone (301) 427-1554.                

Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities dictate.

Dated: November 20, 2006.

Carolyn M. Clancy, 

Director.

[FR Doc. 06-9486 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
#### People’s Trust & Savings Bank, appellant, v. F. A. Balliet et al., appellees.

Filed June 23, 1914.

No. 17,776.

Appeal from the district court for Furnas county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Williams, Lawrence, Welsh & Green*and *John Stevens,*for appellant.

*Lambe & Blotter, contra.*

Letton, J.

The questions of fact and of law involved in this case are substantially the same as in the case of *People’s Trust**419*& Savings Bank v. Rork, ante,*p. 415, and the decision in that case rules this.

The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Rose, Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
§ 1182.7 Institute procedures for collecting information from individuals for its records. The Institute shall collect information, to the greatest extent practicable, directly from you when the information may result in adverse determinations about your rights, benefits, or privileges under Federal programs. In addition, the Institute shall inform you of the following, either on the form it uses to collect the information or on a separate form that you can retain, when it asks you to supply information: ( a ) The statutory or executive order authority that authorizes the solicitation of the information;
( b ) Whether disclosure of such information is mandatory or voluntary;
( c ) The principal purpose(s) for which the information is intended to be used;
( d ) The routine uses that may be made of the information, as published pursuant to § 1182.4; and
( e ) Any effects on you of not providing all or any part of the required or requested information.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 71 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 71

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
   Protection Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance for New, 
   Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for 
     Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 11 (legislative day, April 10), 2024

 Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Cruz, Mr. 
    Lankford, Mr. Lee, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. 
  Sullivan, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Mullin, and Mr. Ricketts) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
   Protection Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance for New, 
   Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for 
     Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, 
and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil 
and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review'' (89 Fed. Reg. 16820 (March 8, 
2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice                           ( print page 67362)                        is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Cancer Biomarker Application Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 27, 2006.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Bell, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6188, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-8754,                         *bellmar@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 15, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9315 Filed 11-20-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 903.6 Appeal of initial denial of access. ( a ) After receiving notification of an initial denial of access to a record, an individual may request a review and reconsideration of the request by the Executive Director of the Corporation, or an officer of the Corporation designated by him, but other than the Privacy Protection Officer. Appeals for review shall be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director, Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1220 North, Washington, DC 20004. The appeal shall identify the record as in the original request, shall indicate the date of the original request and the date of the initial denial, and shall indicate the expressed basis for the denial.
( b ) Not later than 30 days after receipt of an appeal, the Executive Director, or an officer of the Corporation designated by him, will complete review of the appeal and the initial denial and either: ( 1 ) Determine that the appeal should be granted, and notify the individual in writing to that effect; or,
( 2 ) Determine that the appeal should be denied because the information requested is exempt from disclosure. If the reviewing official denies the appeal, he or she shall advise the individual in writing of the decision and the reasons for reaching it, and that the denial of the appeal is a final agency action entitling the individual to seek judicial review in the appropriate district court of the United States as provided in 5 U.S.C. 552a(g).
[42 FR 5973, Feb. 1, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 45824, Nov. 4, 1985]
- 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports

REVEIZ v . EL-KASABY Cite as 305 Neb. 440

Elena Reveiz, appellant, v. Bassel El-Kasaby, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 3, 2020. No. S-19-278. Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J Russell Derr , Judge. Affirmed. Denise E. Frost, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, and, on brief, Stacy L. Morris and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy, Funke , and Freudenberg , JJ. Per Curiam

. The February 19, 2019, order of the Douglas County District Court is affirmed by an equally divided court. Affirmed. Papik , J., not participating. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/26/2020 08:08 AM CDT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ACCURUS AEROSPACE §

CORPORATION and ACCURUS §

AEROSPACE WICHITA, LLC, §

§

Defendants and Counterclaim § No. 20, 2020

Plaintiffs

- Below, Appellants / §

Cross

- Appellees, §

§

v. § Court Below: Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

BRADLEY E. JULIUS, §

§

Plaintiff and Counterclaim § C.A. No. 2017

- 0632

Defendant

- Below, Appellee / §

Cross

- Appellant, §

§

and §

§

ZTM, INC., THE KELLEY JULIUS §

REVOCABLE TRUST, and THE §

BRADLEY JULIUS R EVOCABLE §

TRUST, §

§

Counterclaim Defendants

- Below, §

Appellees /Cross

- Appellants

. §

Submitted: November 4, 2020

Decided: November 9 , 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , and MONTGOMERY

- REEVES , Justices.

This 9th day of November, 2020, having considered this matter on the briefs and

the oral arguments of the parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same

should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery

in its Memorandum Opinion dated Oc tober 31, 2019, and the Stipulation and Final Order

and Judgment and Stay Pending Appeal, dated December 18, 2019;NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Court of Chancery

be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/ s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
§ 2104.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually precribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf person (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and adminstrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 2104.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

COURTNEY JOYDELL MILLER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-778

[December 8, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF000909A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L. 

Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 156.907 Form and content of request for hearing. ( a ) The request for hearing must do the following: ( 1 ) Identify any factual or legal bases for the assessment or decertifications with which the respondent disagrees.
( 2 ) Describe with reasonable specificity the basis for the disagreement, including any affirmative facts or legal arguments on which the respondent is relying.
( b ) Identify the relevant notice of assessment or decertification by date and attach a copy of the notice.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 84 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 

Plants; Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating 

Critical Habitat’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2024 

Mr. RICKETTS (for himself, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. 

DAINES, Mr. LEE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROUNDS, Mrs. BRITT, 

Mr. WICKER, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MARSHALL, and Mr. 

HOEVEN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating 

Critical Habitat’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘EnVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:00 May 16, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ84.IS SJ84

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 84 IS 

1 dangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing En2 dangered and Threatened Species and Designating Crit3 ical Habitat’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 24300 (April 5, 2024)), and 

4 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 1322.7 Application approval. ( a ) Approval of any application under section 614(e) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3057e(e)), shall not commit the Assistant Secretary for Aging in any way to make additional, supplemental, continuation, or other awards with respect to any approved application.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary for Aging may give first priority in awarding grants to grantees that have effectively administered such grants in the prior year.
( c ) Upon approval of an application and acceptance of the funding award, the Tribal organization or Hawaiian Native grantee is required to submit all performance and fiscal reporting as set forth by the Assistant Secretary for Aging on a no less than an annual basis.
( d ) If the Assistant Secretary for Aging disapproves of an application, the Assistant Secretary for Aging must follow procedures outlined in section 614(d) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3057e(d)).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

          - [Meeting No. 06-07] 

# For more information: 

Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's Washington Office (202) 898-2999. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902. 

Dated: November 22, 2006. 

Maureen H. Dunn, 

General Counsel and Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-9448 Filed 11-24-06; 10:23 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P