alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 153.520 Attribution and allocation of revenue and expense items. ( a ) *Attribution to plans.* Each item of expense in the target amount with respect to a QHP must be reasonably attributable to the operation of the QHP issuer's non-grandfathered health plans in a market within a State, with the attribution based on a generally accepted accounting method, consistently applied. To the extent that a QHP issuer utilizes a specific method for allocating expenses for purposes of § 158.170 of this subchapter, the method used for purposes of this paragraph must be consistent.
( b ) *Allocation across plans.* Each item of expense in the target amount must reflect an amount equal to the pro rata portion of the aggregate amount of such expense across all of the QHP issuer's non-grandfathered health plans in a market within a State, allocated to the QHP based on premiums earned.
( c ) Disclosure of attribution and allocation methods. A QHP issuer must submit to HHS a report, in the manner and timeframe specified in the annual HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters, with a detailed description of the methods and specific bases used to perform the attributions and allocations set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) *Attribution of reinsurance and risk adjustment to benefit year.* A QHP issuer must attribute reinsurance payments and risk adjustment payments and charges to allowable costs for the benefit year with respect to which the reinsurance payments or risk adjustment calculations apply.
( e ) *Maintenance of records.* A QHP issuer must maintain documents and records, whether paper, electronic, or in other media, sufficient to enable the evaluation of the issuer's compliance with applicable risk corridors standards, for each benefit year for at least 10 years, and must make those documents and records available upon request from HHS, the OIG, the Comptroller General, or their designees, to any such entity, for purposes of verification, investigation, audit or other review.
[77 FR 17248, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15530, 15550, Mar. 11, 2013; 78 FR 65094, Oct. 30, 2013]
Exhibit 35


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-13
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-13


          The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)     A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7292

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

SEAN FONTAE WHITLEY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00166-H-1) 

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Sean Fontae Whitley, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, 

Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Sean Fontae Whitley appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See United States v. Whitley, No. 5:04-

cr-00166-H-1 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
§ 1641.21 Additional proceedings as to disputed material facts. ( a ) In actions not based upon a conviction or civil judgment under § 1641.18(d) or (e), if the debarring official finds that the IPA's submission raises a genuine dispute of material fact, the IPA shall be afforded an opportunity to appear (with counsel, if desired), submit documentary evidence, present witnesses, and confront any witnesses the OIG presents. If the debarring official finds that the IPA's submission does not raise a genuine issue of material fact, additional proceedings will not be provided. In such case, the hearing shall be held entirely by written submissions, except that a meeting may be held under § 1641.20(c).
( b ) If the debarring official determines additional proceedings to be warranted, OIG shall notify the IPA. Such notice shall include notice of the procedures under which such proceedings shall be conducted.
( c ) A transcribed record of any additional proceedings shall be prepared and a copy shall be made available to the IPA without cost.
( d ) The debarring official may refer disputed material facts to a fact finder, who need not be a member of the OIG staff, for fact finding, analysis and recommendation.
eruutt nf tqt luittb ~tutrs ~I:toif;E'l'Y-FIRST CONGRESS 

FmsT SESSION {Convened Jaauary 3, x¢9 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

37-022--69--No.~6 
Date of !Calendar 

report No 

1969 

July 7 463 

7 464 

i 46:i 

7. 466 

7 4-67 

I 

7 468 

7 470 

471 

Message No 

506 

I 

I 

.108 

nO!J 

110 

.i]] 

440 

Name ofnommee 

ADBASSADORS~Con. 

Jqhn A. CQ.lhol!n, of 

California, a Foreign 

ServiCe officer of the 

cla.qs of career minister. 

Luther I. R~plogle, of 

Illmo1R 

K~nneth Rn~h, of New 

Y01k 

,J F1fP i::lymmg.ton, J1 , 

_ ot _ \1 ,1ryland 

Samuel Z Westerfield, Jr, 

of the District of Columb1a., a Foreign 

S!>rVlC<' officer of cla~s 1 

U.S. REPRESENTATIVE 

TO THE OAS 

Joseph J. Jova, of Flor1da, 

a Foreign Serv1ce officer 

of class 1. 

U.S. ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INFORMATION 

177 W1lbam F. Bnt'kl<'v, Jr., 

of ConnE>oiJCu t 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF GEN1 

ERAL SESSIONS 

i 14 W Byron Sorrell, of 1

VLnvland 

2 

I 

I 

I 

I 

Office 

Ambae.sador Extraotdinary 

and Plenipotentiary of the 

United States of America 

to the Republic of 

Tunisia. 

Ambassador Extraordinary 

and Plenipotentiary of 

the United States of 

America to Iceland. 

Ambassador Extraordinary 

nnd Plenipotentiary of 

the United States of 

America to the FedE-ral 

Republic of Germany. 

A.mbassador Extraordtnary 

and Pleniopotentiary of 

the United States of 

America to Trinidad o.nd 

Tobago. 

Ambassador Extraordinary 

and Plenipotentiary of 

the United States of 

Am~1 it'J. to L1l>eria 

The representative of the 

United States of Amer1ca on the Councll of the 

Organization of American States, with the 

rank of Ambassador. 

A member of the U.S Advisory Commission on 

Information for the tc1 m 

of 3 years expiring 

.Jnn. 27, 1972. 

An associate judge of the 

Diqtrict of Columbia 

I 

I 

Predecessor 

Rigurd S. Larmon, 

t ~rm E'Xplred. 

1 court of general session& 

----'---....!._---'----------- ___ J.~:r_ ~he term of 10 years. 

A new position 

rr!'ai<'d under 

Public Law 90-579. 

lJ ~ fiiOVFRNMFNT PRINTING OFFIC£,1 1969
§ 16.21 Record and decisions. ( a ) Each decision is issued by three Board members (see § 16.5(b)), who base their decision on a record consisting of the appeal file; other submissions of the parties; transcripts or other records of any meetings, conferences or hearings conducted by the Board; written statements resulting from conferences; evidence submitted at hearings; and orders and other documents issued by the Board. In addition, the Board may include other materials (such as evidence submitted in another appeal) after the parties are given notice and an opportunity to comment.
( b ) The Board will promptly notify the parties in writing of any disposition of a case and the basis for the disposition.
§ 3.14 Am I required to remove a sunken, grounded, or disabled vessel? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the owners or authorized salvager of a sunken, grounded, or disabled vessel must remove the vessel, all component parts and equipment, and all associated cargo thereof in accordance with procedures established by the superintendent. In establishing removal procedures, the superintendent is authorized to: ( 1 ) Establish a reasonable date by which vessel removal operations must be complete;
( 2 ) Determine times and means of access to and from the vessel; and
( 3 ) Specify the manner or method of removal.
( b ) The superintendent may waive the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section or prohibit removal of the vessel, equipment, or cargo upon a written determination that: ( 1 ) The removal would constitute an unacceptable risk to human life;
( 2 ) The removal would result in extensive resource damage; or
( 3 ) The removal is impracticable or impossible.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
M. Lee, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and operating results of the
      Company.
   /s/
      George M. LeeGeorge
      M. LeeVice
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 August 8,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70973-70974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) notice

[[Page 70974]]

is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate 
proposals for support through the RAID program by making available to 
the research community, on a competitive basis, NCI new agent 
development contract resources for the preclinical development of drugs 
and biologics. The outcome of the evaluation will be a decision whether 
NCI should support the request and make available contract resources 
for support through the RAID program to the research community, NCI new 
agent development for the preclinical development of drugs and 
biologics. The research proposals and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the proposed research projects, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel Rapid Access to Intervention Development.
    Date: December 20, 2006.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Agenda: To evaluate Rapid Access to Intervention Development 
Portfolio.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Boulevard, 
Rm. 319, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Phyllis G. Bryant, Executive Secretary, Program 
Analyst, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer 
Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 8022, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301 435-9137.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 30, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9577 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-077
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

    The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., and its officers and agents

Date:  September 10, 2007


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum

Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior officer in charge of securitization
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
#### § 150.431 Acknowledgment of request for hearing.

After receipt of the request for hearing, the ALJ assigned to the case or someone acting on behalf of the ALJ will send a written notice to the parties that acknowledges receipt of the request for hearing, identifies the docket number assigned to the case, and provides instructions for filing submissions and other general information concerning procedures. The ALJ will set out the next steps in the case either as part of the acknowledgement or on a later date.

[86 FR 24286, May 5, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA. The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.                    

*Date:*                         January 11, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Johns Hopkins Bayview Campus, Bldg. C, 2nd Floor Auditorium, Baltimore, MD 21224.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Stephen J. Heishman, PhD, Research  Psychologist, Clinical Pharmacology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, (410) 550-1547.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of  Health, HHS)

Dated: December 1, 2006.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 06-9572  Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 160.516 Discovery. ( a ) A party may make a request to another party for production of documents for inspection and copying that are relevant and material to the issues before the ALJ.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, the term “documents” includes information, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained in this section may be interpreted to require the creation of a document, except that requested data stored in an electronic data storage system must be produced in a form accessible to the requesting party.
( c ) Requests for documents, requests for admissions, written interrogatories, depositions and any forms of discovery, other than those permitted under paragraph (a) of this section, are not authorized.
( d ) This section may not be construed to require the disclosure of interview reports or statements obtained by any party, or on behalf of any party, of persons who will not be called as witnesses by that party, or analyses and summaries prepared in conjunction with the investigation or litigation of the case, or any otherwise privileged documents.
( e ) ( 1 ) When a request for production of documents has been received, within 30 days the party receiving that request must either fully respond to the request, or state that the request is being objected to and the reasons for that objection. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part must be specified. Upon receiving any objections, the party seeking production may then, within 30 days or any other time frame set by the ALJ, file a motion for an order compelling discovery. The party receiving a request for production may also file a motion for protective order any time before the date the production is due.
( 2 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for protective order or deny a motion for an order compelling discovery if the ALJ finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is irrelevant;
( ii ) Is unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will unduly delay the proceeding; or
( iv ) Seeks privileged information.
( 3 ) The ALJ may extend any of the time frames set forth in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
#### § 1638.5 Recipient policies.

Each recipient shall adopt written policies to implement the requirements of this part.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YURIBIA MEDINA DAMACIO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73425 

Agency No. A205-259-009 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Yuribia Medina Damacio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73425 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th 

Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Medina 

Damacio failed to establish the harm she experienced or fears in Mexico was or 

would be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 

1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by 

criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus 

to a protected ground”). We do not address Medina Damacio’s contentions as to 

the cognizability of a proposed particular social group because the BIA did not 

deny relief on this ground. See Santiago-Rodriguez v. Holder, 657 F.3d 820, 829 

(9th Cir. 2011) (“In reviewing the decision of the BIA, we consider only the 

grounds relied upon by that agency.” (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted)). Thus, Medina Damacio’s asylum and withholding of removal claims 

fail. 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Medina Damacio failed to show it is more likely than not she would be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). 
3 15-73425 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.