alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1800.7 Agency review of request for correction or amendment of the record. Within ten working days of the receipt of the request to correct or to amend the record, the Deputy Executive Secretary of the Foundation will acknowledge in writing such receipt and promptly either— ( a ) Make any correction or amendment of any portion thereof which the individual believes is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete; or
( b ) Inform the individual of his or her refusal to correct or to amend the record in accordance with the request, the reason for the refusal, and the procedures established by the Foundation for the individual to request a review of that refusal.
Exhibit 12(i)**Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Kin Wah Loh, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Qimonda AG (the “Company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.November 16, 2007         /s/ Kin Wah Loh   Kin Wah Loh   Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Management Board
§ 235.70 Prompt notice to child support or Medicaid agency. ( a ) A State plan under title IV-A of the Social Security Act must provide for prompt notice to the State or local child support agency designated pursuant to section 454(3) of the Social Security Act and to the State title XIX agency, as appropriate, whenever: ( 1 ) Aid is furnished to a child who has been deserted or abandoned by a parent, to the parent(s) with whom the child lives, or to a pregnant woman under § 233.90(c)(2)(iv), or
( 2 ) Any of the persons in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is deemed to be a recipient of aid under § 233.20(a)(3)(viii)(D).
( b ) In this section: ( 1 ) *Aid* means Aid to Families with Dependent Children, or AFDC Foster Care.
( 2 ) *Prompt notice* means written notice including a copy of the AFDC case record, or all relevant information as prescribed by the child support agency. Prompt notice must also include all relevant information as prescribed by the State medicaid agency for the pursuit of liable third parties. The prompt notice shall be provided within two working days of the furnishing of aid or the determination that an individual is a recipient under § 233.20(a)(3)(viii)(D). The title IV-A, IV-D and XIX agencies may agree to provide notice immediately upon the filing of an application for assistance.
( 3 ) *Furnish* means the date on which cash is given to the family, a check or warrant is mailed to the family, a deposit is made in a bank for the family, or other similar circumstances in which an assistance payment is made to the family, or the date on which individuals are determined to be recipients under § 233.20(a)(3)(viii)(D).
( 4 ) *A child who has been deserted or abandoned by a parent* means any child whose eligibility for AFDC is based on continued absence of a parent from the home, and includes a child born out of wedlock without regard to whether the paternity of such child has been established.
[47 FR 5683, Feb. 5, 1982, as amended at 56 FR 8933, Mar. 4, 1991]
364 P.2d 158

#### Dennie V. DONAHUE & Dennis H. Donahue, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BIG LOST RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8968.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 30, 1961.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 8, 1961.

Robert M. Kerr, Jr., Blackfoot, George Barnard, Idaho Falls, for appellant.

Furey & Furey, Sherman F. Furey, Jr., Salmon, and Jack B. Furey, Challis, Robert H. Copple, Boise, for respondents.

KNUDSON, Justice.

By virtue and under the authority of the decision filed this date in the case of Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 83 Idaho 374, 364 P.2d 146, the judgment for damages entered by the trial court in favor of respondents in this action is affirmed. The order of injunction is set aside. No costs allowed.

TAYLOR, C. J., and SMITH, - Mc-QUADE and McFADDEN, JJ., concur.
CERTIFJCATION

May 18, 2009

I hereby certify that a public hearing was held January 28, 2009, on a revision to the State of

Delaware State Implementation Plan for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe National

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, by amending Regulation No. 1141 — LIMITING

EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FROM CONSUMER ANDCOMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, Section 2.0 — Consumer Products and Section 4.0 — Adhesivesand Sealants. The effective date ofthese amendments is April 11, 2009.

I further certi& that the hearing was held in accordance with the notice required by Subsection

51.102 of 40 CFR 51.

Air Quality ManagementDivision ofMr and Waste Management

PRINTED ON Ve€aeusa’ze RECYCLED PAPER 4 ,od Itsu Vepemü on 1/oaf
1,

— — •1

•1
Exhibit 31(ii)



                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
               10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
               this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA12 (the
               "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
               as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
               fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
               statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
               statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
               covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
               other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
               period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports;

          4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
               servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
               review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
               statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
               Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
               obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
               respects; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
               attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
               this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
               Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
               exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
               report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
               reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
          Bank of New York, as Trustee.

     Date: March 27, 2007


          /s/ Steve Bailey
          ----------------
          Steve Bailey
          Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Exhibit 32

10-K

|   | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|  /s/ Chene Gardner           |
| Chene Gardner, Chief Financial Officer |
| Chief Executive Officer           |
|                                   |
|                                   |
|                                   |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Card USA, Inc.., (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Chris J. Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               |  |                     
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|ADVANCED GROWING SYSTEMS, INC.
|                               | 
|By                             |  | /s/ Chris J. Nichols
|                               |  | Chris J. Nichols    
|                               |  | CEO                 
|                               |  | January 15, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Russell J. Howard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ Russell J. HowardName: Russell J. HowardTitle:  Chief Executive OfficerDate:  August 13, 2003




I, Lawrence W.
Briscoe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ Lawrence W. BriscoeName: Lawrence W. BriscoeTitle:  Chief Financial OfficerDate:  August 13, 2003
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

Request for Consideration of a Legal 

Question Submitted by Stop These 

Oppressive People: Tyrants Racists 

Unqualifieds Misogynists Propagandists 

("STOP TRUMP") (C00847673)

)

)

)

)

)

)

LRA 1193

CERTIFICATION

I, Vicktoria J. Allen, recording secretary of the Federal Election Commission executive session, 

do hereby certify that on December 14, 2023, the Commission took the following actions in the abovecaptioned matter: 

1. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to:

Conclude that the Committee’s name on its Statement of Organization 

does not violate 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(4).

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, and Trainor voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Broussard, Lindenbaum, and Weintraub dissented.

2. Failed by a vote of 3-3 to:

Conclude that the Committee’s name on its Statement of Organization 

includes the name of a federal candidate as proscribed by 52 U.S.C. 

§ 30102(e)(4).

Commissioners Broussard, Lindenbaum, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the motion. 

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, and Trainor dissented.

3. Decided by a vote of 4-1 to:

Instruct the Office of General Counsel to provide the requestor

with a copy of the vote certification in this matter.
Federal Election Commission Page 2

Certification for LRA 1193

December 14, 2023

Commissioners Cooksey, Dickerson, Lindenbaum, and Trainor voted affirmatively for the 

decision. Commissioner Weintraub dissented. Commissioner Broussard abstained.

Attest:

 December 15, 2023

Date Vicktoria J. Allen

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
EX-33 (k)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414


Appendix I


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
Shari L. Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 70975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA. The meeting will be closed to 
the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and 
projects conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.
    Date: January 11, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, NIH, Johns Hopkins Bayview Campus, Bldg. C, 2nd Floor 
Auditorium, Baltimore, MD 21224.
    Contact Person: Stephen J. Heishman, PhD, Research Psychologist, 
Clinical Pharmacology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 5500 
Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, (410) 550-1547.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 1, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-9572 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Jennifer MagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer and Director

Date: May 14, 2007

----
§ 152.19 Covered benefits. ( a ) *Required benefits.* Each benefit plan offered by a PCIP shall cover at least the following categories and the items and services: ( 1 ) Hospital inpatient services
( 2 ) Hospital outpatient services
( 3 ) Mental health and substance abuse services
( 4 ) Professional services for the diagnosis or treatment of injury, illness, or condition
( 5 ) Non-custodial skilled nursing services
( 6 ) Home health services
( 7 ) Durable medical equipment and supplies
( 8 ) Diagnostic x-rays and laboratory tests
( 9 ) Physical therapy services (occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy)
( 10 ) Hospice
( 11 ) Emergency services, consistent with § 152.22(b), and ambulance services
( 12 ) Prescription drugs
( 13 ) Preventive care
( 14 ) Maternity care
( b ) *Excluded services.* Benefit plans offered by a PCIP shall not cover the following services: ( 1 ) Cosmetic surgery or other treatment for cosmetic purposes except to restore bodily function or correct deformity resulting from disease.
( 2 ) Custodial care except for hospice care associated with the palliation of terminal illness.
( 3 ) In vitro fertilization, artificial insemination or any other artificial means used to cause pregnancy.
( 4 ) Abortion services except when the life of the woman would be endangered or when the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.
( 5 ) Experimental care except as part of an FDA-approved clinical trial.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 95-31168 Summary Calendar

_____________________

DALE BATISTE; REGINALD DAVIS; HERMAN WASHINGTON, JR.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus
COLONIAL SUGARS, INC. (of Delaware) ET AL.,

Defendants,

and

WILLIE MARTIN and JOSEPH S. NASSAR,
Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 92-CV-3513-L

_________________________________________________________________ October 25, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sheriff Willie Martin and former Sheriff Joseph Nassar appeal

from the denial of their motion for summary judgment. They contend-2-

that we have jurisdiction over their appeal and contend that the
district court erred by denying their motion.

Sheriff Martin was sued in his official capacity only. We
lack jurisdiction over his appeal from the denial of summary
judgment. A ldy v. Valmet Paper Machinery , 74 F.3d 72, 75 (5th Cir.

1996); see Burns-Toole v. Byrne , 11 F.3d 1270, 1273 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied , 114 S.Ct. 2680 (1994).
Regarding Nassar, the di strict court rejected his qualified
immunity contention because it found g enuine issues of material
fact regarding Nassar’s oversight of the investigation that

resulted in the plaintiffs’ arrests and the training of Nassar’s

subordinates. We lack jurisdiction to review the denial of summary
judgment. Johnson v. Jones , 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2159 (1995).

APPEAL DISMISSED.