alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2522.340 How will I know if two projects are the same? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615 , Aug. 16, 2024.
The Corporation will consider two projects to be the same if the Corporation cannot identify a meaningful difference between the two projects based on a comparison of the following characteristics, among others: ( a ) The objectives and priorities of the projects;
( b ) The nature of the services provided;
( c ) The program staff, participants, and volunteers involved;
( d ) The geographic locations in which the services are provided;
( e ) The populations served; and
( f ) The proposed community partnerships.
[73 FR 53760, Sept. 17, 2008]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2



                    AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN

THIS INSTRUMENT, dated September 29, 2000, is an amendment to that certain 1998
Stock Option Plan of Greenstone Roberts Advertising, Inc.

WHEREAS, Section 17 of the 1998 Stock Option Plan of Greenstone Roberts
Advertising, Inc. ("Plan") permits the amendment of the Plan;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Plan is hereby
amended as follows effective as of January 1, 1998:

1.   Section 5 of the Plan is amended by the deletion of the first sentence
thereof and the insertion in lieu thereof of the following:

     "The Committee may, but shall not be required to, grant, in accordance with
     this Plan, Options to purchase an aggregate of up to 250,000 shares, which
     may be either Treasury Shares or authorized but unissued Shares."

2.   Section 6 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

     "Price.    (a) The exercise price per Share of the Shares to be purchased
     pursuant to any Option shall be fixed by the Committee at the time an
     Option is granted, but in no event shall it be less than the Fair Market
     Value of a Share on the day on which the Option is granted.

               "(b) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, upon the
     merger of Kupper Parker Communications, Inc. ("KPCI") into the Corporation,
     the Committee shall convert the existing KPCI options to purchase 34 shares
     of KPCI shares into stock options to purchase 185,300 shares of
     Corporation, exercisable at any time up to December 31, 2007 at a price of
     $1.00 per 5,450 shares of the Corporation. "

3.   Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written upon the consent of the Board of Directors.

GREENSTONE ROBERTS ADVERTISING, INC.

By:    /s/ Ronald M. Greenstone
       ------------------------
       Ronald M. Greenstone, Chairman
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

d0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138540 

MARK JONES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138540 

 COA: 288226 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Saginaw CC: 08-001972-AH 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 4(i)(C)**Trust AgreementbetweenInfineon Technologies AG, Munich— “Infineon”—andQimonda AG, Munich—  “Qimonda”—**Preamble**Infineon is the owner of 1,104,665,707 shares at the nominal value of 10 New Taiwan Dollarsper share (“shares”) of Inotera Memories, Inc. with its registered office in Taoyuan, Taiwan, (the“Company”). The Company has been listed since March 17, 2006 on the Taiwan StockExchange. According to the regulations of Taiwanese stock exchange law, Infineon is therewithsubject to statutory disposal regulations related to the shares. Infineon is engaged innegotiations with the responsible Taiwanese authorities to obtain a certificate of exemptionallowing it to transfer the ownership of the Company shares to Qimonda.
1

 
**§ 1****Transfer of the shares**Infineon herewith agrees to transfer the shares with contractual effect as of midnight May 1,2006 (“date of effectiveness”) to Qimonda.The shares shall be transferred *in rem*in accordance with the following provision.Infineon agrees to promptly transfer the shares to Qimonda *in rem*after the responsible Taiwaneseauthorities have granted Infineon a certificate of exemption from the statutory disposalrestrictions. Should this certificate of exemption be denied, the following shall apply:Infineon agrees to promptly transfer 50% of the shares to Qimonda after the end of the first day ofthe year of the first stock exchange listing of the Company. The remaining 50% of the shares shallbe transferred *in rem*in equal parts (respectively 10%) after 2 years, 2.5 years, 3 years, 3.5years and 4 years after the date of the first stock exchange listing of the Company.As soon as it is possible for Qimonda to do so, Qimonda undertakes to deposit as many shares withthe Taiwan Central Depository as is required based on Taiwanese regulations for the ‘legal persondirector’ of the Company. The term ‘legal person director’ means that Qimonda as director of theCompany may delegate natural persons to the Board of Directors of the Company. The ‘legal persondirector’ is subject to certain disposal regulations under the regulations of Taiwanese law, whichare independent from the disposal regulations referred to in the preamble.**§2****Retransfer of the shares**Infineon and Nanya Technology, Corp. (“Nanya”) are parties to a joint ventureAgreement concerning the Company. Infineon and Nanya have agreed to entitleInfineon to transfer the shares to Qimonda. This is subject to the proviso, however, that uponNanya’s request, Qimonda transfer the shares back to Infineon if Qimonda is no longer a companyassociated with Infineon within the meaning of Sections 15 *et seq.*of the Aktiengesetz [GermanStock Corporation Act].
2

 
The above-described duty of retransfer ends on the earlier of the two following dates:**—** The fifth day of the year after the date of effectiveness.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

November 10, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Patricia Carmona 

Chief CompUance Officer 

Tom Hintermister 

Acting Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Christopher Hughey yfi ^ 

Deputy General Counsel / 

Lawrence L. Calvert, Jr. 

Associate General Counsel 

General Law and Advice 

7 

/ 

Lorenzo Holloway 

Assistant General Counsel 

Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Margaret J. Forman ^fd, .^^ '^Kj^i^ 

Attomey ^ 

Draft Final Audit Report on the National Right to Life Political 

Action Committee (LRA 812) 

The Audit Division has submitted for our review the Draft Final Audit Report 

("DFAR") for the National Right to Live Political Action Committee. Tfae DFAR has 

two findings: (1) Misstatement of Financial Activity; and (2) Disclosure of Occupation 

and Name of Employer. We agree with the Audit Division as to these findings; however, 

we discuss the scope limitation below. If you have any questions, please contact 

Margaret J. Forman, the attomey assigned to tfais audit. 
Memorandum to Patricia Carmona and Tom Hintermister 

DFAR on National Right to Life PAC (LRA 812) 

Page 2 of2 

SCOPE LIMITATION SHOULD BE MORE SPECIFIC 

The scope limitation states that although NRL PAC satisfied the minimum 

recordkeeping requirements of 11 C.F.R. 102.9, a lack of external documentation limited 

the Audit staffs testing of the proper reporting of debts and obligations and the adequacy 

of independent expenditure disclosures. According to the draft, the type of external 

documentation described includes invoices and broadcast station affidavits, whicfa are 

items the Audit staff normally expects to find when conducting an audit. 

We suggest that the scope limitation be more specific as to what precisely it was 

about the Committee's reporting of debts and obligations, or of independent expenditures, 

that the audit was unable to fully test. Independent expenditure reporting, in particular, 

involves a number of different requirements, and it is not clear from the draft which of 

these requirements could not be sufficiently tested.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition VII, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 23, 2009

|                               |                
|------------------------------ | ---------------
|/s/                            | Kirk M. Warshaw
|                               |                
|Kirk M. Warshaw               
|Chief Financial Officer       
|(Principal Financial
 Officer)

A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Monday, February 6, 2006.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David W. Skidmore, Office of Board 
Members; 202-452-2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 27, 
2006.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 06-943 Filed 1-27-06; 3:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 2553.42 Is an RSVP volunteer a federal employee, an employee of the sponsor or of the volunteer station?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545, Aug. 30, 2024.

RSVP volunteers are not employees of the sponsor, the volunteer station, CNCS or the Federal Government.

[83 FR 64655, Dec. 17, 2018]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

PHILLIP QUINN,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 31 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of September , 2023, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

lhroh B7, 19939i2r.C. J. Xllde, Xaroh 27, 1939, Yage 2

and eball slve the time and plaoa for reoelrlne euoh bids. All auoh ooqetltlre 

### bids shall be kdpt on file 

### by the oounty auditor 

### as a partof the reoorda of his office, and shall be subjeot to lnapeotion 

### by any one deslrlaFto eee them. Coplee or all bide received shall be furnished by the county auditor to the oou6ty Judge and to the oom- 

### ~I~lonora oourt;urdwhen the bids 

### reoe1v.d are'notaatisf~otorytotho-uld lwdga or

. .
. ..- eaant~oaslaaloaen,thaaudltor 

### aha%lrejaot **said** bids 

### and 

### re-ednti>aafor new blda. Ii oases cf emrg6aoy,, puNI not la ax- - 086s 

### of one huadrd end fiftydoll- mar bo made.upoarequlaltlonto bo approvedw 

### th0 o~Ia6Ioner6 eiourt, 

### rlthoutd+ertlrIng sor ocatpetItIT54

bids.-
It was 

### kd.6 In tha oaas 

### of kyatt 

### Motelt%oil& Fork8 vs. 

### Fannln Coiaity, Ill SR tata) 787 fhat 

### Aktlola 1659,aupra, manll%6t6 

### an Intent'onthe part OS the.Le 

### P latum to deolnre.r pnbllo

### polloyruooaaltatlqoaqot: tirebidding. Itwas 

### held In thIabasethat 

### a wrlt;t+lr 

### oontraot

or awarduhe~by the Oomlaalonera~~,ou?tattempted

to ratify

pdqahaae

of oul~orta~

from;a 

### aaa*aotu?a pursuant 

### to advortlwsnt ior bid6 whioh dewrI+g'.?!+%+ 

### by trade name was **invalid ~&or**  

### the ~I'OVIS~O~~.O~ .4~W*le 1669,requiring 

### advertIaaaant *aooordIag

to 

### apeoItloitIoti
You state in yeur 

### inqulq that 

### to oatabltahao~ 

### fain8peoIrIoatlona In the 

### adwrtIamWlt *ll ban tha ofiaot of ellnln6tlng oapetltlte bidding In that bat 066 bid wo6ld be reoeIre& The 

### aomlulon~raf owrt 

### Is glwn broad dl6oretlonary ~666~6 WI+ n6peot +o **ertabM8hing** and setting epeolfIoatIon6 for 

### equipsent to be pureh66ed **by** 

### andusedby the oarmt7. Haring **set** Show 6peolfI~atIo~ they 

### mat then SuWt them by r&ertI6Iag the name to dll those who oare to bid. It 18 aterl6l If but o6e per60 or firm oaree to bld on the 

### partloular+eohlneq desired by the oouuty.

It la therefore the opInlo6 of thla Department and you are eo advised th& oompetlflye bidding order theolrounstanoss **stated by**  **you is**  **not only**  legal but

mandatory upon the Commissioners* Court.

TrufitlnC,

that this 5atlereatorliy answema your inquiry, m remeln Very truly yours

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,278
<PP&E>                                         827,575 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 436,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,162
<BONDS>                                        240,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    135,000
<COMMON>                                           461
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   445,175
<SALES>                                         73,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,026
<CGS>                                          278,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,211 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (256,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (28,052)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (228,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (228,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.80)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2752]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Commission Action

January 23, 2006.
    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in response to the 
Commission's Order in the proceeding listed in this Public Notice, and 
published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.106. Notwithstanding any statement to 
the contrary in any previous public notice, this proceeding is 
conducted consistently with section 316 of the Communications Act of 
1934, 47 U.S.C. 316. The full text of these documents is available for 
viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 
DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy 
and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to these 
petitions must be filed by February 16, 2006. See section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition 
must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have 
expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Use of Returned Spectrum in the 2 GHz 
Mobile Satellite Service Frequency Bands (IB Docket Nos. 05-220 & 05-
221).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-888 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**Exhibit 34.1****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**To the Board of Directors of Sallie Mae, Inc.:We have examined Sallie Mae, Inc.’s assertion, included in the accompanying Assertion on Compliancewith Regulation AB Criteria, that Sallie Mae, Inc. (the Corporation) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe SLM Reg AB Student Loan Platform (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31,2006, excluding (i) criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(3)(iii),1122 (d)(4)(x), 1122 (d)(4)(xi), 1122 (d)(4)(xii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xiii) which the Corporation hasconcluded are not applicable to the Platform and (ii) criteria 1122 (d)(2)(ii) which theCorporation has concluded is applicable to the Platform but is not the responsibility of theCorporation. Appendix A to the Corporation’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backedtransactions and securities defined by the Corporation as constituting the platform. TheCorporation is responsible for compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on the Corporation’s assertion based on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Corporation’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing ofselected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Corporation processedthose selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions andservicing activities performed by the Corporation during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Corporation during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Corporation’s compliance with the servicing criteria.In our opinion, the Corporation’s assertion that the Corporation complied with the aforementionednon-excluded servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the SLM Reg ABStudent Loan Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects./s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPMarch 23, 2007
P.1 

OAR Box 1846 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

15) ll-C-3 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/18/2008 7:30:14 AM Sheet 15 of 93 
P.2 

\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

DEC 2 11990 

' ..> \l \j2"'^ 

Ms. Abby Hand \ V Jp^ ^ 

Huntone and Williams x-j: .. ^. • 

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW \ V~~*~*ZTftQC& 

Washington, DC 20036

 l —**• M H w — — 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Dear Ms. Hand: 

Please find enclosed a copy of the October 17, 1989 letter 

that you requested from EPA Assistant Administrator Linda 

Fisher to the California Trucking Association concerning the 

testing of methanol fuels. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 

(313) 668-4200, extension 665. 

Sincerely, 

74 n{. y^A^ 

Kent M. Helmer, Toxicologist 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Enclosure 

cc: Docket: A-90-7 

9853W