alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of San Joaquin Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Bruce MaclinBruce MaclinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 13, 2008
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Stephen M. AnnisStephen M. AnnisChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)March 13, 2008
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Dr. JohnCoustas, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                 The Company’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have;

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)              omitted;

c)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d)              omitted; and

5.                 The Company’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

| Date: May 30, 2007                       |
|------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Dr. John  Coustas                    |   |
| Dr. John  Coustas                   |
| *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
"Kinde Durkee" To "Marty Kuest" <mkuest@fec.gov> 

<klnde@durkeeandassociates 

.com> ^ '"Matthew Fortune"' <matthew@durkeeandassociates.com>, 

'"Peter Froelich'" <pete@durkeeandassociates.com> 

05/24/2011 07:09 PM bcc 

Subject Democratic Party of Orange County 

History: jhls message has been forwarciedi 

Dear Marty 

Thank you for providing the additional time in which to respond to the audit findings and 

recommendations. 

Regarding Finding 1. "Misstatement of Financial Activity" 

We have researched the discrepancies found by the audit staff and have corrected our 

records per the staff recommendations. These corrections will be found in the 

amendments which will be electronically filed before the end of the day on May 24, 

2011. Please note that memo entries and/or filing notes are attached to the reports to 

explain specific entries which were modified and corrected. 

Regarding Finding 2. "Untimely Deposit of Receipts" 

In response to this finding we only reiterate that the delays in deposit were due to a new 

credit card processing system that we were unprepared to handle. Since that time, we 

have taken measures to correct these delays by setting new internal controls and 

training staff on the use ofthe processing system. Due to these modifications, we trust 

that this issue will not be reoccurring in the future. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Kinde 

Kinde Durkee 

Durkee & Associates 

1212 S. Victory Blvd. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Tel: 818.260.0669 x9100 

Fax: 877.260.0657 

www.durkeeandassociates.com
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of RTI International Metals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy G. Rupert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

August 9, 2005

       /s/ TIMOTHY G. RUPERT
--------------------------------------
          Timothy G. Rupert
       Chief Executive Officer

* This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
  purpose.
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1516 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1516 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MARCUS MATHES POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 37926 Church Street in Dade 

4 City, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser5 geant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus 

10 Mathes Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1516 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMathes Post Office’’. Dade City, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus al Service located at 37926 Church Street in
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 

Apri l 3, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Thomas Hintermister 

Assistant Staff Director 

FROM: Lawrence L. Calvert, Jr. 

Associate General Counsel 

Lorenzo Holloway ^^^^. ^ 

Assistant General Counsel 

For Public Finance and Audit Advice 

Jennifer Waldman C^S ^ 

Paralegal Specialist v/ 

SUBJECT: Draft Final Audit Report on Washington State Republican Party (LRA #874) 

The Ofiice of General Counsel has reviewed the Draft Final Audit Report on tiie 

Washington State Republican Party Committee. We concur with the findings in the Proposed 

Report (Finding 1 - Misstatement of Financial Activity, Finding 2 - Misstatement of Financial 

Activity - Levin Fund, and Reporting ofDebts and Obligations). If you have any questions, 

please contact Jennifer Waldman, the paralegal assigned to this audit. 

cc: Christopher Hughey, Deputy General Counsel
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Micahel Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of FundsTech Corp (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal yeaqr ended August
      31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a)
      or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 25, 2007





/s/ Michael
      Dodak  Name:
      Michael Dodak


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74960-74961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provision of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that Agency is preparing an information 
collection request for OMB review and approval and to request public 
review and comment on the submission.
    Comments are being solicited on the need for the information, its 
practical utility, the accuracy of the Agency's burden estimate, and on 
ways to minimize the reporting burden, including automated collection 
techniques and uses of other forms of technology. The proposed form 
under review is summarized below.

DATES: Comments must be received within 60 calendar days of this 
notice.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form and the request for review 
prepared for submission to OMB may be obtained from the Agency 
submitting officer. Comments on the form should be submitted to the 
Agency Submitting Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Essie 
Bryant, Record Manager, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, 1100 
New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20527; 202-336-8563.
    Summary Form Under Review:
    Type of Request: Revised form.
    Title: OPIC Self-Monitoring Questionnaire.
    Form Number: OPIC-162.

[[Page 74961]]

    Frequency of Use: Annually for duration of project.
    Type of Respondents: Business or other institution (except farms); 
individuals.
    Standard Industrial Classification Codes: All.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies or citizens 
investing overseas.
    Reporting Hours: 6.5 hours per project.
    Number of Responses: 350 per year.
    Federal Cost: $35,000.
    Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231, 234(a), 239(d), 
and 240A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The questionnaire is completed by OPIC-
assisted investors annually. The questionnaire allows OPIC's assessment 
of effects of OPIC-assisted projects on the U.S. economy and 
employment, as well as on the environment and economic development 
abroad.

    Dated: December 6, 2006.
Eli Landy,
Senior Counsel, Administrative Affairs, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 06-9649 Filed 12-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
EXHIBIT 4.4
                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
                              THE STATE OF NEW YORK
                                 (Company LOGO)
Number                                                                  Shares
APC-
                                                                 CUSIP 006899108

                   ADIRONDACK PURE SPRINGS MT. WATER CO., INC.
                             TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE
                   40,000,000 COMMON SHARES AT $.01 PAR VALUE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ________________________________________ is the registered
holder of the number of shares of Common Stock set forth above of the named
Corporation, fully paid and non-assessable transferable only on the books of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender off
this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until
countersigned by the transfer agent. The Corporation will furnish to any
shareholder upon request and without charge a full statement of designations,
preferences, limitations and relative rights of the shares of each class
authorized to be issued.

WITNESS, the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

                                Countersigned
                                      Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
                                                                 Jersey City, NJ
                                                                 Transfer Agent

                                             By: /s/ DAVID SACKLER
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                              Authorized Officer

                                      SEAL

David Miller, Secretary Treasurer                        David Sackler President
#### Stephens, appellant, v. Aulls.

*Contract—in restraint of trade—presumption not in famor of.*

An agreement in restraint of trade ought to be contained, in clear and express terms, in a deed or contract in writing. And *it seems*that a court of equity, if it can enforce, specifically, such a contract, under any circumstances, it should not do so when it is in parol and not resting on a distinct consideration, and is in dispute.

Where the evidence left it doubtful whether the parties, when they finally concluded a contract for the sale and purchase of an iron foundry, had any distinct agreement or understanding that the defendant (the purchaser,) was bound, as matter of contract, not to set up the same business in opposition to the plaintiff, at the same place, or within ten miles thereof: *Held,*that the contract was,of a character not to be helped by any inference or intendment; and that a complaint in equity, filed to restrain the defendant from carrying on the business within the limits specified, was properly dismissed ; but that the dismissal should have been without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to sue at law.

Appeal from a judgment rendered at special term dismissing the complaint. The action was brought by George W. Stephens against Ephraim J. Anils, to restrain defendant from carrying on the business of making iron castings, in the village of Oramel, Allegany county, *782or within ten miles thereof, it being alleged that he had agreed not to do so, which defendant denied. The trial court upon the facts found against the plaintiff.

*Angel & Jones,*for appellant.

*F. Brundage,*for respondent.

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The head-note states the point upon which the judgment was affirmed. The affirmance was made with the modification that the judgment should be without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to sue at law. The following authorities were cited in the opinion:

Upon the right to enforce such contracts at law, *Chappel*v. *Brockway, 21*Wend. 158; *Rose*v. *Sadgbee,*id. 166. As to the power of a court of equity to enforce it, *Collins*v. *Plumb,*16 Ves. 454.

*Judgment as modified affirmed.*
¿ììi':,,'December12,2012Mr.ShawnGarvin(3R400),RegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,RegionIII1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,Pa19107DearMr.Garvin:TheStateofDelawarerequeststhattheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(U.S.EPA)redesignatetheDelawareportionofthePhiladelphia-Wilmington,PA-NJ-DIlnonattainmentarea(PhiladelphiaNAA)toattainment,underthe1997annualand2006dailyfineparticulate(PMzs)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS),andapprovetheassociatedmaintenanceplansasStateImplementationPlans(SIP)revisions.TheefTectivedateoftheseSIPrevisionsisNovember27,2012.TherequirementsoftheCAASectionIl0(a)(2)(A)havebeenmetthroughthenormalpublichearingprocessestablishedbytheStateofDelawarewithpropernotification(30days)priortotheconveningofthepublichearing.AttachmentsAandBarecopiesofaffidavitsasproofofpropernotification.ttisthepositionoftheStateofDelawarethatallminimumrequirementssetforthinthe1990CleanAirActAmendmentshavebeenmet.EnclosedareDVD'scontainingtheProposedandF-inalRedesignationandMaintenancePlansforthe1997Annualand200624-hrPMz.sNAAQSandallthereferencematerialsandsupportingdocuments.Thereisalsoan"Outline",aWorddocument,tohelpwithlocatingrelevantinlormationoranalysis,asneeded,forthereview.WeappreciatetheassistancethatyourstaffprovidedDelawareinpreparingthesedocuments,andlooklorwardtocontinuingthecooperativeeffortbetweenDelawareandEPAinthisimportantwork.AchievingtheannualanddailyPMz.shealthstandardsisasignificant'r.'i.,à-'i.efrì?,,.r:,Ífr!.r'Mr.ShawnGarvin(3R400),RegionalAdministratorDecember12,2012Page2accomplishmentforourairqualitystaff.Asalways,feelfreetocontactmeorAliMirzakhalili,Director,DivisionofAirQuality,(302)739-9402,ifyouhaveanyquestionsconcemingtheencloseddocuments.Sincerely,CollinP.O'MaraSecretaryEnclosurescc:AmieHowell,w/oencl.DianaEsher,EPAw/encl.AliMirzakhalili
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Atlas/dataabstract for the United States and selected areas**** 
SuDocNumber:D1.58/4:
ItemNumber:0310-E-22(online)
CGPsystem Number:000487599
 - 1987.pdf1988.pdf1989.pdf1990.pdf1991.pdf1992.pdf1993.pdf1994.pdf1995.pdf1996.pdf1997.pdf
 **
**From:** Jan Miller

**To:** (KUCC), Salmon, Lydia; wleipold@phelpsdodge.com **Date:** 7/25/03 1:42PM **Subject:** RE: RE: Kennecott numbers Based on these numbers and your phone message, it sounds like we should use the 97 - 98 average of 340,269 for KUC's input sulfur. I will inform Lily Wong at Region 9. >>> "Salmon, Lydia (KUCC)" <salmonl@kennecott.com> 07/25/03 10:35AM >>> Jan, Going by Wayne's responmse, you should either use the 1996 - 1998 average or the 1997 - 1998 average, depending on whether 1996 operation at KUC is considered sufficiently abnormal to exclude it. Here are those averages: Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter Sulfur Input (1996 - 2002)

Concentrate Feed Annual 1996 - 8 Avg 1997 - 8 Avg Smelted(1) Sulfur(2) I nput Sulfur Input Sulfur Input Sulfur Year (tons/year) (%) (tons/year) (tons/year) (tons/year) 1996 669,868 31.22% 209,113 1997 1,040,792 30.77% 320,220 1998 1,188,500 30.32% 360,318 296,550 340,269 1999 1,174,060 29.17% 342,438 2000 1,181,776 30.76% 363,562 2001 1,074,743 29.85% 320,811 2002 1,208,121 29.52% 356,637 (1) Figures from Annual Reports (2) Average of analysis of monthly composite samples Lydia S. Salmon KUCC

----- Original Message ----- From: Jan Miller [ mailto:JANMILLER@utah.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:55 PM To: Salmon, Lydia (KUCC) Subject: Fwd: RE: Kennecott numbers Lydia, here's Wayne's response to my inquiry. I'm out the door til Friday, so you can let me know then what you want me to do. Thanks.
#### John H. Devlin, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

*Devlin*v. *City of New York,*132 App. Div. 922, affirmed.

(Argued February 15, 1909;

decided March 2, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 11, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*L. Laflin*Kellogg, *Alfred C. Petté*and *Philip M. Brett*for appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Terence Farley*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Hot voting: Hisoook, J.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc.
      (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:
      /s/DAVID B. MCWILLIAMS


David
      B.
      McWilliams


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      August 14, 2007
§ 2502.20 Applicability. ( a ) This part is applicable to all former and current AmeriCorps employees, including special Government employees.
( b ) This part does not apply to volunteers, service members, contractors, or any other individuals who may be affiliated with AmeriCorps, but not employed by the agency.