alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                           REGIONS FINANCING TRUST II

                  This Certificate of Trust of Regions Financing Trust II (the
"Trust"), dated January 26, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. SS. 3801, et seq.) (the "Act").

                  1.       NAME. The name of the business trust being formed
hereby is Regions Financing Trust II.

                  2.       DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of
the trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of
Delaware is Bankers Trust (Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, Montgomery
Building, 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200, Wilmington, Delaware 19805.

                  3.       EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

                  4.       COUNTERPARTS. This Certificate of Trust may be
executed in one or more counterparts.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


<PAGE>   2

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the
Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section
3811(a)(1) of the Act.

                  BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, a New York banking corporation, not in
                  its individual capacity but solely as trustee


                  BY: /s/ Eileen M. Hughes
                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                     Name: Eileen M. Hughes
                     Title: Vice President

                  BANKERS TRUST (DELAWARE), a Delaware banking corporation, not
                  in its individual capacity but solely as trustee


                  By: /s/ Elizabeth B. Ferry
                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                     Name: Elizabeth B. Ferry
                     Title: Assistant Vice President


                                      -2-
AFS-14-004-E December 2, 2013

Exemption No. 10901 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0873

Ms. Kathleen Hodge Parent of Joanna Hodge

5914 W. Bent Tree Drive Phoenix, AZ 85083

Dear Ms. Hodge:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received September 27, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Joanna Hodge for an ex emption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Joanna to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Joanna.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Joanna Hodge an exemption from § 121.311(b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Joanna is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Joanna’s parents or a caregiver accompanying her. Joanna Hodge may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. In addition, Joanna’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

GateHouse Media, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement (No. 333-138225) on Form S-8 of GateHouse Media, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GateHouse Media, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and2005, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for year ended December 31, 2006 (Successor Period), the period from June 6, 2005 to December 31, 2005 (Successor Period), theperiod from January 1, 2005 to June 5, 2005 (Predecessor Period), and the year ended December 31, 2004 (Predecessor Period), and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2006, annualreport on Form 10-K of GateHouse Media, Inc. 

As discussed in Note 1(q) to the consolidated financial statements, during 2006 the Company adopted Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Payment*. 

As discussed in note 1(i) to the consolidated financialstatements, in 2005 the Company changed to June 30 the date on which the annual impairment assessment of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives is made. 

As discussed in note 1(b) to the consolidated financial statements, effective June 6, 2005, FIF III Liberty Holdings LLC acquired all of the outstanding stock of GateHouse Media, Inc. in a business combinationaccounted for as a purchase. As a result of the acquisition, the consolidated financial information for the period after the acquisition is presented on a different cost basis than for the periods prior to the acquisition and therefore, is notcomparable. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 12, 2007
NYSE: DNR A Case History of Tracking Water Movement Through Fracture Systems in the Barnet Shale March 10 - 11, 2011Presentation Outline
● Micro - seismic well evaluation  What is it?  First well – TRWD B#2 ● Plan, side and end view ● Results  Second well – TRWD G#2 ● Plan, side and end view ● Results ● Predicting well interaction “without” micro - seismic  Well plan & assumptions  “Fracture map” ● ObservationsMicro-Seismic Mapping of Fractures 

### ● Mapping the cracking of rocks 

### ● Tools have limited detection distance capabilities 

###  Function of rock properties adjacent to receivers 

###  Barnett Shale typically limited to ~3000’ 

### ● Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) 

###  Correlates to production volumes 

###  Helps identify under- stimulated areas 

###  Helps to identify faults 

### ● Has a price4 TRWD Lease, Wise County, Texas

TRWD B#25 TRWD B#2 Plan View of Micro- Seismic Events6 TRWD B#2 Side View of Micro- Seismic Events7 TRWD B#2 End View of Micro- Seismic EventsResults of the TRWD B#2 Micro- Seiemic Mapping 

### ● Average stage stimulation volume – 34,000 barrels (~191,000 cubic feet) 

### ● Average SRV per stage – 900,000,000 cubic feet 

###  Note that water volume is only 0.02% of SRV! 

### ● Average fracture height – 350 feet 

### ● Average area covered by fracture network – 60 acres 

### ● Conclusion – big jobs cover big areas9 TRWD Lease, Wise County, Texas

TRWD G#210 TRWD G#2 Plan View of Micro- Seismic Events11 TRWD G#2 Side View of Micro- Seismic Events12 TRWD G#2 End View of Micro- Seismic EventsResults of the TRWD G#2 Micro- Seiemic Mapping 

### ● Average stage stimulation volume – 20,000 barrels (~112,000 cubic feet) 

### ● Average SRV per stage – 490,000,000 cubic feet 

###  Again water volume ~ 0.02% of SRV 

### ● Average fracture height – 400 feet 

### ● Average area covered by fracture network – 28 acres 

### ● Conclusion – the rock changes over distanceCase Study Well Specifics and Assumptions 

### ● Specifics 

###  Fluid volume per stage – 17,000 barrels 

###  Total of six stimulations 

### ● Assumptions 

###  Average height 375 feet 

###  Average SRV – 410,000,000 cubic feet 

###  Average acreage covered by each stage – 25 acres 

###  Total Acres covered by all stages – 150 acres15 Case Study Well – A Very Elaborate SystemObservations from Case Study Well 

### ● Increased well density increase the complexity of fluid movement 

### ● Fluid movement is not limited (laterally) to the acreage covers by calculated SRV 

### ● It is possible to predict fluid movement to a degree

### Questions Now or Ask me Later
#### § 1631.19 Accounting and reporting to LSC.

A recipient must maintain an accounting of the amount of LSC funds relating to the purchase or maintenance of real estate purchased with LSC funds. The accounting must include the amount of LSC funds used to pay for acquisition costs, financing, and capital improvements. The recipient must provide the accounting for each year to LSC no later than April 30 of the following year or in its annual audited financial statements submitted to LSC.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 23, 2019

p0116 

# Order

Clerk January 23, 2019

158154

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158154

COA: 334614

Saginaw CC: 15

- 041847

- FC

DOMINIQUE ARNETT RAMSEY, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu

of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment

reversing the Saginaw Circuit C ourt’s March 3, 2016 decision to grant a new trial on

grounds that the verdict was agains t the great weight of the evidence, and we REMAND

this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on reconsideration granted. The

Court of Appeals held that the trial court had abused its discretion in granting a new trial

“for the same reasons” as it erred in deciding that the evidence was insufficient to convict

the defendant of conspiracy, and found that “the record evidence did not preponderate

against the jury’s verdict to the extent that a miscarriage of justice has occurred.” Though

there ma y be sufficient evidence to convict when the evidence is viewed in the light most

favorable to the prosecutor, that does not render a decision on the great weight of the

evidence an abuse of discretion. See People v Lemmon , 456 Mich 625, 633

- 635 (1998).

On remand, the Court of Appeals shall determine whether the decision to grant a new trial

was within the range of principled outcomes in light of the trial court’s finding that the jury

verdict resulted in a miscarriage of justice. MCR 6.431(B). In all o ther respects, leave to

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented

should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, David W. Gifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ David W. Gifford   
|                       |  |  |  | David W. Gifford       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David W. Gifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  | /s/ David W. Gifford   
|                   |  | David W. Gifford       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
Order entered March 5 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01151
- CV BRIAN PLEMONS, Appellant

V. COTTAGES AT HICKORY CROSSING, Appellee On Appeal from the Cou nty Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 04690
- D



### O RDER The clerk’s record in this appeal has not been filed. On December 10, 2018, Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren filed a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing app ellant the clerk’s record would not be filed until he paid the fee for preparation of the record

. Appellant, however, filed a statement of inability to pay costs on October 2, 2018 in the county court and nothing before us reflects the county court signed an order requiring him to pay costs. Accordingly, w e ORDER Mr. Warren to file the clerk’s record, without payment of costs, no later than March 15, 2019

. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145(a). We note the reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant ha s not requested it. By letter dated December 27, 2018, we cautioned appellant that the appeal would be submitted without the reporter’s record unless he notified the Court , within ten days, that he had requestedthe record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c). To date, appellant has not responded. Accordingly, we

ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. We further ORDER appellant to file his brief within thirty days of the filing of the clerk’s record.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Warren and the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan G. Silverglat,
Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Alan G. SilverglatAlan G. SilverglatSenior Vice President-Finance andChief Financial OfficerNovember 4, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          44,580
<SECURITIES>                                    18,565
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,332
<PP&E>                                           6,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,121
<SALES>                                         29,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,625
<CGS>                                           14,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (243)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,475)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,475)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0404

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CIMMARON STEVEN DRENNAN,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 6, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2022

02/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0404
Placeholder: confidential business information item 

Hudson Technologies CBI handout from 12-14-11 

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by 

email at donaldson.david@epa.gov.
EXHIBIT
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS







Wright& Company, Inc. hereby
consents to the use of our analysis relative to the evaluation entitled “EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT,
Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of Atlas Energy Resources,
LLC In Certain Properties Located in Various States, Pursuant to the
Requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Effective December 31,
2008, Job 08.1050,” for use in the Annual Report of Atlas Energy
Resources, LLC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said analysis in the
Registration Statements of Atlas Energy Resources, LLC on Forms S-3 (File No.
33-148429, File No. 33-149692 and File No. 33-153590) and on Form S-8 (File No.
33-140037) and to all references to Wright & Company, Inc. as having
prepared such analysis and as an expert concerning such analysis.







WRIGHT
      & COMPANY, INC.By:
            /s/ D. Randall WrightD.
      Randall WrightPresident





Brentwood,
Tennessee


March 2,
2009
#### § 1701.6 Form of denial.

A reply denying a request shall be in writing, signed by the Associate Director, and shall include: (a) A specific reference to the exemption or exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act authorizing the withholding of the record, (b) brief explanation of how the exemption(s) applies to the record(s) withheld, (c) a statement that the denial may be appealed under § 1701.7 within thirty days by writing to the Executive Director, National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, Suite 601, 1717 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20036, and (d) that judicial review will thereafter be available in the district in which the requester resides or has his principal place of business, the district in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia.

[40 FR 7653, Feb. 21, 1975]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AcculturationAdolescentsBiculturalismChildrenCultural BackgroundCultural DifferencesElementary Secondary EducationImmigrantsParent Child RelationshipRefugeesSchool RoleVietnamese People

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget