alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 546

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ASHLEY TAMEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 319 th District Court

of Nueces C ounty, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant Ashley Tamez filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order imposing

sanctions and continuing or modifying h er terms of probation. Represented by counsel,

she has now filed a motion to dismiss her appeal on grounds that there is “no ba sis to

appeal [because] the appeal was for [an] order that was not final and appealable. ” She2 requests that we dismiss her appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P .42.2(a) (allowing appellate

courts to dismiss criminal appeals upon the appellant’s motion before the appellate court’s

decision when the attorney and appellant both sign a written motion to dismiss). Her

motion to dismiss is not opposed by the State of Texas. We have not issued an opinion

in this case and the motion to withdraw meets the requirements of the appellate rules

insofar as it is signed by both appellant and h er counsel. See id.

Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, we grant a ppellant’s motion

to dismiss and we dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2 ( b ).

Delivered and filed on the

11th day of March , 202 1

.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 

Notice is hereby given that the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), 

acting in accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. c 111, Sections 142A through 142N and Section 

169A of the Clean Air Act, will hold public hearings on a proposed Revision to the Massachusetts 

Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) and on proposed amendments to 310 CMR 7.00: 

Definitions and 310 CMR 7.05 : Fuels All Districts. On December 30, 2011, MassDEP submitted a 

Regional Haze SIP to the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval . The proposed 

Revision to the Massachusetts Regional Haze SIP will amend the December 30, 2011 SIP to address 

Best Available Retrofit Technology requirements and other emission reduction commitments for electric 

generating units. The proposed amendments to 310 CMR 7 .00 : Definitions and 310 CMR 7.05: Fuels 

All Districts would lower the allowable sulfur content of distillate oil (i .e ., home heating oil) and 

residual oil combusted at stationary sources to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, which contributes to 

regional haze and poses direct health impacts. After MassDEP finalizes the amendments, it will submit 

them to EPA to be included in the Massachusetts Regional Haze SIP. 

Public hearings will be conducted under the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 30A on: 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 1 :00 p .m. 

Springfield Public Library 

220 State Street, Community Room 

Springfield, Massachusetts 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 at 9 :30 a.m. 

Department of Environmental Protection 

One Winter Street, 2"d Floor Atlantic Conference Room 

Boston, Massachusetts 

Testimony may be presented orally or in writing at the public hearings . Written comments also will be 

accepted until 5 :00 PM on April 9, 2012 . Written testimony must be submitted by email (preferred) or 

mail to : 

Glenn Keith Email : G1enn.Keith a,state.ma.us 

Department of Environmental Protection 

Bureau of Waste Prevention 

One Winter Street, 7`h Floor 

Boston, MA 02108 

The proposed SIP Revision and proposed amendments to 310 CMR 7.00: Definitions and 310 CMR 

7.05 : Fuels All Districts are available on MassDEP's web site at 

www.mass.gov/dep/public/publiche.htm. 

For special accommodations for these hearings, please contact Donald M. Gomes, MassDEP ADA 

Coordinator, at 617-556-1057, TDD Service 1-800-298-2207, One Winter Street, Boston, MA 02108. 

This information is available in alternative format upon request. 

By Order of the Department 

Kenneth L. Kimmell 

Commissioner
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 20, 2018

No. 04-18-00344-CV

John B. URBAHNS,

Appellant

v.

LSREF2 COBALT (TX), LLC,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI22479

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s brief was due on November 16, 2018. Before the brief’s twice-extended due 

date, the parties filed a joint motion to abate this appeal until November 30, 2018, to give them 

time to participate in settlement discussions. 

The parties’ joint motion to abate this appeal is GRANTED. We ABATE this appeal 

until November 30, 2018.

We ORDER Appellant to file in this court not later than November 30, 2018, (1) a 

motion to dismiss the appeal or (2) a motion to reinstate the appeal on the court’s docket so the 

appeal may proceed. 

If the parties fail to settle, Appellee’s brief will be due on December 10, 2018. 

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of RAINEARTH INC. for the year
ended April 30, 2010, I, Yin, TianHui, Chief Financial Officer of RainEarth
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|(1) | such Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2010, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K/A for the year
      ended April 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of RainEarth
  Inc..



|                      | /s/
      Yin, TianHui 
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: August 24, 2010 | Yin, TianHui           
|                      | Chief Financial Officer

---
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463

 

November 18, 2022 

 

VIA E-MAIL

Sean Anderson 

201 L Street, NW Unit 101 #324 

Washington, DC 20036 

 RE: MUR 8082 

Sean Anderson 

Broken Promises

Stand Up for Justice 

` 

Dear Mr. Anderson: 

This is in response to a request for an extension to respond to the complaint filed in the above 

mentioned matter we received on November 18, 2022. After considering the circumstances in this 

matter, the Office of General Counsel has granted the requested extension. Accordingly, the response 

is due on or before the close of business December 30, 2022. You may contact me if you have any 

questions at cela@fec.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 

 Kathryn Ross, Paralegal

 Complaints Examination and 

 Legal Administration 

MUR808200086
#### § 1801.40 Travel expenses of finalists.

The Foundation will provide partial funding for intercity round-trip transportation from the finalist's nominating institution to the interview site. The Foundation does not reimburse finalists for lodging, meals, local transportation, or other expenses. The Foundation announces the terms and conditions of support on its website (*http://www.truman.gov*) and in the Bulletin of Information.
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP INTEREST

I,  WALTER  NIEMI,  whose  full  post  office  address  is:

P.O.  Box  44
Richbar  Store
Quesnel,  British  Columbia
V2J  5E5

in consideration of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and  sufficiency  of  which  is hereby acknowledged do hereby sell and assign to
NIEW INDUSTRIES INC., a corporation in the Province of British Columbia, Canada,
whose  address  is  Niew  Industries Inc., 5975 Selkirk Crescent, Prince George,
British  Columbia,  Canada,  V2N  2G9, all my interest in the world in and to my
invention  relating  to  a "MULTIPLE DRUM MIXING SYSTEM", as fully described and
claimed  in  my  application  for  a  patent  for  such  invention and to all my
corresponding  right,  title  and  interest in and to any patent which may issue
therefor.

Signed  at  Prince  George,  British  Columbia, Canada, this 13 day of December,
1998.

/s/  signed           /s/  signed
-----------           -----------
Witness               WALTER  NIEMI


<PAGE>
                               WITNESS DECLARATION

I,  Ken  Bergestad,  hereby  declare  that  I  did  witness  WALTER NIEMI who is
personally  known  to  me, execute the attached patent assignment in regard of a
"MULTIPLE  DRUM  MIXING  SYSTEM", at Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, on
the  13th  day  of  December,  1998.

/s/  signed
-----------
Signature
§ 1606.1 Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to: ( a ) Ensure that the Corporation is able to take timely action to deal with incidents of substantial noncompliance by recipients with a provision of the LSC Act, the Corporation's appropriations act or other law applicable to LSC funds, a Corporation rule, regulation, guideline or instruction, or the terms and conditions of the recipient's grant or contract with the Corporation;
( b ) Provide timely and fair due process procedures, proportional to the proposed action, when the Corporation has made a preliminary decision to terminate a recipient's LSC grant or contract, to debar a recipient from receiving future LSC awards of financial assistance, or to impose a limited reduction in funding; and
( c ) Ensure that scarce funds are provided to recipients who can provide the most effective and economical legal assistance to eligible clients.
( d ) None of the following actions are subject to the procedures or requirements of this part: ( 1 ) A reduction of funding required by law, including but not limited to a reduction in, or rescission of, the Corporation's appropriation that is apportioned among all recipients of the same class in proportion to their current level of funding;
( 2 ) A reduction or deduction of LSC support for a recipient under the Corporation's fund balance regulation at 45 CFR part 1628;
( 3 ) A recovery of disallowed costs under the Corporation's regulation on costs standards and procedures at 45 CFR part 1630;
( 4 ) A withholding of funds pursuant to the Corporation's Private Attorney Involvement rule at 45 CFR part 1614.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001068105
<NAME> WESTFORD ACQUISITION CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   380
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5000000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       380
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        

</TABLE>
Meeting of the MV Working Group 

Oct. 12-13, 2011 

NRECA (hosting) 

Draft Agenda 

Proposed overall goal of meeting: 

1. Review core concerns with data/analysis and hear Navigant/LBL proposed approach to meeting 

them. 

2. Fully air issues relating to impact of various efficiency levels on steel industry competitiveness 

and likely steel availability and price (especially amorphous and ZDMH). 

3. Arrive at specific charge to Navigant/LBL re further data needs and/or new or modified analysis 

(subject to proviso that it must be capable of being completed by November 2, one week before the 

next plenary meeting. 

October 12 

09:00 Welcome and Introductions 

09:15 Finalization of rules of procedure 

09:30 Navigant presentation on Engineering Analysis Issues 

11:00 Break 

11:15 Engineering Analysis discussion cont’d; Stakeholder presentations on engineering analysis 

12:30 Lunch 

1:30 LBL presentation of response to data/method issues raised w.r.t. LCC/NPV/MIA analysis 

3:15 Break 

3:30 LBL presentation cont’d/AK Steel presentation on impacts of Els on steel industry and supply 

5:00 Adjourn 

October 13 

9:00 Steel impact discussion if needed 

 Decision on precise definition of competitiveness TSL 

 Prioritization of issues and data/analysis needs 

 Decision on specific charge and timetable for revising/supplementing data and analysis 

12:00 Adjourn
§ 1706.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by April 9, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspections: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
EXHIBIT 33.7

          Report on Assessment with Compliance with Servicing Criteria
                           for Asset-Backed Securities
                            (MSX International, Inc.)

            REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC REGULATION AB
                               SERVICING CRITERIA

MSX International, Inc. (MSXI) (the "Asserting Party) is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
MSXI has used the servicing criteria communicated to MSXI by the servicer, Ford
Motor Credit Company ("Ford Credit"), to assess compliance with the applicable
criteria. Accordingly, servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i)-(ii) are applicable to
the activities performed by MSXI (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") of
holding and safeguarding retail installment sale contracts as described in
MSXI's service level agreement with Ford Credit. MSXI has concluded that all
other servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with
respect to the asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report. The
transactions covered by this report include the asset-backed securities
transactions involving retail installment sale contracts for which the Asserting
Party served as an Item 1122 party participating in the servicing function, that
were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Transactions").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Transactions
taken as a whole.

Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period as set
forth in this assertion.

MSX International, Inc.

By:      /s/ Frederick K. Minturn
         ------------------
         Frederick K. Minturn

Title:   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:    March 15, 2007
§ 154.225 Determination by CMS or a State of an unreasonable rate increase. ( a ) When CMS receives a Rate Filing Justification for a rate increase subject to review and CMS reviews the rate increase under § 154.210(a), CMS will make a timely determination whether the rate increase is an unreasonable rate increase. ( 1 ) CMS will post on its Web site its final determination and a brief explanation of its analysis, consistent with the form and manner prescribed by the Secretary under § 154.210(b)(2), within five business days following its final determination.
( 2 ) If CMS determines that the rate increase is an unreasonable rate increase, CMS will also provide its final determination and brief explanation to the health insurance issuer within five business days following its final determination.
( b ) If a State conducts a review under § 154.210(b), CMS will adopt the State's determination of whether a rate increase is unreasonable and post on the CMS Web site the State's final determination described in § 154.210(b)(2).
( c ) If a State determines that the rate increase is an unreasonable rate increase and the health insurance issuer is legally permitted to implement the unreasonable rate increase under applicable State law, CMS will provide the State's final determination and brief explanation to the health insurance issuer within five business days following CMS's receipt thereof.
[76 FR 29985, May 23, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 13441, Feb. 27, 2013]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 23, 2013

No. 04-13-00645-CV

Raul GALAZ,

Appellant

v.

CHASE BANK USA, N.A., and Vion Holdings LLC Assignee of Chase Bank USA, N.A.,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 369246

Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT

OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that Appellees recover costs of court for this appeal from 

Appellant.

It is so ORDERED on October 23, 2013.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of October, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 7,1997 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Monday, February 24, 1997 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By David G. Marcos, Executive Clerk 
CALENDAR 

No. 

Ex. RES 

No. 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 
2 

TREATIES 

CALENDAR TREATY REPORTED 

No. Doc. No. SUBJECT BY 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

* 23 78 Charlene Barshefsky, ofthe District of Columbia, Feb 3, 97 Reported by Mr. Roth, 

to be United States Trade Representative, Committee on Finance, without 

with the rank of Ambassador Extraordinary printed report. 

and Plenipotentiary, vice Michael Kantor. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 93 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 93

 To exclude from gross income certain assistance provided to farmers, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2023

  Mr. Booker (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Warnock, and Ms. Smith) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exclude from gross income certain assistance provided to farmers, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farmer and Rancher Tax 
Fairness Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. TAX TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE TO FARMERS, ETC.

    For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of 
any payment described in section 1006(e) of the American Rescue Plan 
Act of 2021 (as amended by section 22007 of Public Law 117-169) or 
section 22006 of Public Law 117-169--
            (1) such payment shall not be included in the gross income 
        of the person on whose behalf, or to whom, such payment is 
        made,
            (2) no deduction shall be denied, no tax attribute shall be 
        reduced, and no basis increase shall be denied, by reason of 
        the exclusion from gross income provided by paragraph (1), and
            (3) in the case of a partnership or S corporation on whose 
        behalf, or to whom, such a payment is made--
                    (A) any amount excluded from income by reason of 
                paragraph (1) shall be treated as tax exempt income for 
                purposes of sections 705 and 1366 of such Code, and
                    (B) except as provided by the Secretary of the 
                Treasury (or the Secretary's delegate), any increase in 
                the adjusted basis of a partner's interest in a 
                partnership under section 705 of such Code with respect 
                to any amount described in subparagraph (A) shall equal 
                the partner's distributive share of deductions 
                resulting from interest that is part of such payment 
                and the partner's share, as determined under section 
                752 of such Code, of principal that is part of such 
                payment.
                                 <all>
```