alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of San Joaquin Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



|/S/ BRUCE MACLINBruce MaclinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 15, 2007
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/S/ STEPHEN M. ANNISStephen M. AnnisChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)March 15, 2007
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### § 1644.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this rule is to ensure that recipients disclose to the public and to the Corporation certain information on cases filed in court by their attorneys.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert C. Woodworth, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Robert C. WoodworthRobert C. WoodworthPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Flex Fuels Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Barr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Thomas BarrName: Thomas BarrTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 22, 2010
Opinion filed May 23, 2013

In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 13 5

- CR

__________

ERNEST ROCHA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 104 th District Court
Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17889B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The jury convicted Appellant, Ernest Rocha, of the offense of indecency

with a child , f ound the enhancement allegation to be true, and assessed punishment

at confinement for fifteen years . We dismiss the appeal.
Appellant’s sentence was imposed on June 21 , 2012

. No motion for new

trial was filed

. Ap pellant’s pro se notice of appeal was filed on April 18, 2013

,2 301 d ays after the date sentence was imposed. T his court notified Appellant by

letter dated April 25 , 201 3 , that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. We
requested that A ppellant respond and show grounds for continuing this appeal. We

also informed A ppellant that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
In response to our letter, Appellant filed a motion in this court requesting an

extension of time to file an out

- of

- time appeal

. Pursuant to T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1), the notice of app eal must be filed within thirty days after the
day sentence is imposed. In this case, the due date was July 23 , 2012. For an
extension, T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3 mandates that the notice of appeal and the motion
for extension must be filed within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the
notice of appeal. Neither the notice of appeal nor the motion for extension was
timely filed

. Absent a timely filed notic e of appeal or the granting of a timely
motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918
S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1993). W e have no jurisdiction to grant Appellant’s motion for extension.

See O livo , 918 S.W.2d 519.
Accordingly, A ppellant’s motion for extension of time to file his notice of
appeal is overruled, and the appeal is dismi ssed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

May 23, 2013
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson, J.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION { COWENEDJANUARY6 1999 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, April27, 1999 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GARY SISCO, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk 
CALENDAR 

No. 

Ex. RES 

No. 

I 

I 

1 

RESOLUTIONS 

SUBJECT 

REPORTED 

BY 
CALENDAR 

No. 

TREATY 

Doc. No. 

2 

TREATIES 

SUBJECT 

I 

REPORTED 

BY 

-

--'------'----. ____ L ______ _ 
3 

NOMINATIONS 

CALENDAR MESSAGE REPORTED 

No. No. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR BY 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* 15 22 Gary S. Guzy, ofthe District of Columbia, to be Mar 17, 99 Reported by Mr. 

an Assistant Administrator of the Chafee, Committee on 

Environmental Protection Agency, vice Environment and Public Works, 

Jonathan Z. Cannon, resigned. without printed report. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 18 3-9 Kent M. Wiedemann, of California, a Career Mar 23,99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador without printed report. 

Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the 

United States of America to the Kingdom of 

Cambodia. 

* 35 3-8 Diane Edith Watson, of California, to be Apr 14, 99 Reported by Mr. Helms, 

Ambassador Extraordinary and Committee on Foreign Relations, 

Plenipotentiary of the United States of without printed report. 

America to the Federal States of Micronesia. 

*Signifies nominee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate 
4 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK
APEX
      BIOVENTURES ACQUISITION CORPORATION


18
      Farm
      Lane


Hillsborough,
      California 94010








June
      30,
      2007








Apex
      Bioventures LLC


18
      Farm
      Lane


Hillsborough,
      California 94010








Ladies
      and Gentlemen:





Reference
      is made to our letter agreement, dated June 7, 2007, concerning your making
      available to us certain office space as well as certain office and secretarial
      services as we may require from time to time for a monthly fee of $7,500. This
      will confirm our agreement that such agreement is terminated.





Very
      truly yours,




APEX
      BIOVENTURES


ACQUISITIONS
      CORPORATION







By:___________________________


Darrell
      J. Elliott, Chairman and


Chief
      Executive Officer





Agreed
      to
      and accepted by:





APEX
      BIOVENTURES LLC








By:
      ___________________________


K.
      Michael Forrest, Chief Executive Office
#### § 213.12 Time of hearing.

The hearing shall be scheduled not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days after the date notice of the hearing is furnished to the State.
EXHIBIT 10.1

                            Agreement with Management




                                       32
<PAGE>




                                    AGREEMENT

We, Brilliant Sun Industry Co., a Florida corporation, do agree with you, our
president, director and management, Michael T. Williams, as of May 4, 1999,
as follows.

o     We will not sell any securities prior to the location of an acquisition or
      merger candidate.

o     The  costs  of   identifying,   investigating,   and  analyzing   business
      combinations  not  obtained  from  the  merger  fee  paid  to  us  by  the
      acquisition  candidate  will be paid with funds  contributed  as a capital
      contribution by our president.  Management will fund our cash requirements
      until an acquisition is closed. Management has placed no cap on the amount
      of funds they will lend.

o     We may not borrow funds and use the loan  proceeds to make payments to any
      officer, director, promoter or affiliate or associate of us.

o     We will not enter into a business combination with any company which is in
      any way wholly or partially  beneficially owned by any officer,  director,
      promoter or affiliate or associate of us.

o     We will not pay a finder's fee to any member of management  for locating a
      merger or acquisition candidate.

o     No member  of  management  intends  to or may seek and  negotiate  for the
      payment of finder's fees.

o     Other  fees may be paid to our  management  if and only if it is agreed by
      the acquisition  candidate in the merger  agreement.  Any such fee will be
      funded  by a fee the  acquisition  candidate  agrees to pay as part of the
      merger agreement. There is no minimum or maximum amount of fee that can be
      paid. The amount will be determined in  arms'-length  negotiations  in the
      merger agreement.

o     The only other  pecuniary  benefit to be  received  by  management  is the
      retention of a to-be-agreed percent of stock after the acquisition closes.
      There is no minimum or maximum amount of stock which can be retained.  The
      amount  will be  determined  in  arms'-length  negotiations  in the merger
      agreement.

o     Except as  described  above,  we will not  utilize  any other  methods  of
      payments by which management or current shareholders receive funds, stock,
      other assets or anything of value whether tangible or intangible

Brilliant Sun Industry Co.,
a Florida corporation



By: /s/ Michael T. Williams ______________________
Michael T. Williams; president, director and management

/s/ Michael T. Williams
Michael T. Williams





                                       33
<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SRKP 14, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A.
      Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. Rappaport
              -----------------------------------
              Richard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              March
                15, 2007
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-069-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0352

Docket Number

2012-SW-063-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin 92-26-004, dated June 4, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
| Subsidiary      Name                                                                                                     |   | Country                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Hong      Kong Highpower Technology Company Limited (“HKHT”)                                                 |   | Hong      Kong                        |
|                                                                                                                     |   |                                  |
| Shenzhen      Highpower Technology Co., Ltd. (1)                                                                         |   | People’s      Republic of China |
|                                                                                                                     |   |                                  |
| HZ      Highpower Technology Co., Ltd. (1)                                                                               |   | People’s      Republic of China |
|                                                                                                                     |   |                                  |
| Springpower      Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Sure Power Technology      (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.) (1) |   | People’s      Republic of China |

| (1) | This      company is a wholly-owned subsidiary ofHKHT. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------|

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1516 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1516

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, as the ``Sergeant Marcus 
                         Mathes Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT MARCUS MATHES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Marcus Mathes Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1516

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, as the ``Sergeant Marcus 
                         Mathes Post Office''.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JEFFREY TAYLOR,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 49 WM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of December, 2021, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the“Company”) on

Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange

Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned,Paul E. Heney, Chief Executive Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

 

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the

Financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

By:

 

 

/s/ Paul E. Heney

Paul E. Heney

Chief Executive Officer

August13, 2013
§ 2540.200 Which entities are required to comply with the National Service Criminal History Check requirements in this subpart? The National Service Criminal History Check is a requirement for entities that are recipients or subrecipients of the following grants: ( a ) Operational grants provided by AmeriCorps State and National;
( b ) Foster Grandparent Program Grants;
( c ) Retired and Senior Volunteer Program Grants;
( d ) Senior Companion Program Grants;
( e ) Senior Demonstration Program Grants that receive funding from CNCS;
( f ) Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Grants;
( g ) September 11th Day of Service Grants;
( h ) Social Innovation Fund Grants;
( i ) Volunteer Generation Fund Grants;
( j ) AmeriCorps VISTA Program Grants;
( k ) AmeriCorps VISTA Support Grants.
[86 FR 11146, Feb. 24, 2021]
•^^a^Ve^f- VU^-^Hl? 

TOBY DOUCHERTi'. CPM. CITY MANAGER 

PAUL BRJSENO, ASSISTANT CITY MANACEJt 

P.O. BOX 490 

1507 MAIN STREET 

HAYS, KANSAS 67601 0490 

TEL 785/628-7320 

FAX 785/628 7323 

www. bays us a- com 

c m ' COMMISSION 

BARBARA K. WASINCER, MAYOR 

TROY HICKMAN 

KENT STEWARD 

HENRY SCHWALLER, IV 

RON MELUCK 

cumi 

^ 

•J 

' - , l-J-..-( 

"o^;-: ;: 

r .-J—j_n- ! 

<^>'-^, 

^ -- - "r i 

June 30, 2011 

Dennis DeVany 

US Department of Transportation 

1100 New Jersey Avenue, SE _ 

Washington, DC 20590 jr. " 

RE: City of Hays Recommendation for Essential Air Service Provider for 2011 -2013 

Hays Regional Airport - Great Lakes Airlines 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Careful consideration was given by the Hays City Commission regarding the four (4) bid proposals that were 

received for the Hays Regional Airport air service provider. The Commission was very pleased to have so 

many airlines were interested in servicing the Hays Regional Airport. 

As you are aware, the main Runway 16/34 is experiencing sub-grade failure. FAA has agreed to fund 

investigation of the condition of the njnway followed by design based on the investigation findings. This Issue 

was a major factor in the Commission making their recommendation. If only rehabilitation Is required, the 

runway would be closed approximately two (2) months; but, if reconstruction Is required, the runway might be 

closed as long as six (6) months. 

The Hays City Commission voted unanimously to recommend that Great Lakes Alriines be allowed to 

continue air service from Hays to Denver for the EAS Contract Period of 2011 -2013. The Beechcraft 1900 

can land on the cross-wind njnway while repairs are being made to Runway 16/34. 

Please consider the Commission's recommendation as you move forward with new contracts for the 

upcoming contract period. 

Feel free to^contact me if you have questions. 

Sincerely, 

TobyDou^hferty, CPM 

City Manager 

Cc: City Commissioners (5) 

ID Creech, Director of Public Works 

John Braun, Assistant Director of Public Works 

Bob Johnson, Airport Manager 

Chuck Howell, Great Lakes Airlines 

EAS Contract Recommendation for 2011-2013 6-27-11
#### § 2525.41 When must an application for an extension be submitted?

An application for an extension must be submitted to AmeriCorps before the award use period ends, or the individual must have been unavoidably prevented from timely submitting the extension application.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxygen, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:
    
    August 2, 2007
    
    /s/ Lawrence W. BriscoeLawrence W. BriscoeChief Financial Officer
#### §§ 909.104-909.109 [Reserved]
§ 1613.5 Criminal representation in Indian tribal courts. ( a ) Legal assistance may be provided with Corporation funds to a person charged with a criminal offense in an Indian tribal court who is otherwise eligible.
( b ) Legal assistance may be provided in a criminal proceeding in an Indian tribal court pursuant to a court appointment only if the appointment is made under a statute or a court rule or practice of equal applicability to all attorneys in the jurisdiction, and is authorized by the recipient after a determination that acceptance of the appointment would not impair the recipient's primary responsibility to provide legal assistance to eligible clients in civil matters.
[79 FR 21151, Apr. 15, 2014]