alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2400.21 Contents of application. Applications must include for ( a ) Senior Fellowships: ( 1 ) Supporting information which affirms an applicant's wish to be considered for a fellowship; provides information about his or her background, interests, goals, and the school in which he or she teaches; and includes a statement about the applicant's educational plans and specifies how those plans will enhance his or her career as a secondary school teacher of American history, American government, social studies, or political science;
( 2 ) An essay of up to 600 words that explains the importance of the study of the Constitution to: ( i ) Young students;
( ii ) The applicant's career aspirations and his or her contributions to public service; and
( iii ) Citizenship generally in a constitutional republic;
( 3 ) The applicant's proposed course of graduate study, including the name of the degree to be sought, the required courses to be taken, as well as information about the specific degree sought;
( 4 ) Three evaluations, one from an immediate supervisor, that attest to the applicant's strengths and abilities as a teacher in grades 7-12; and
( 5 ) A copy of his or her academic transcript.
( b ) Junior Fellowships: ( 1 ) Supporting information which affirms an applicant's wish to be considered for a fellowship; provides information about the applicant's background, interests, goals, and the college which he or she attends or attended; and includes a statement about the applicant's educational plans and specifies how those plans will lead to a career as a teacher of American history, American government, social studies, or political science in grades 7-12;
( 2 ) An essay of up to 600 words that explains the importance of the study of the Constitution to: ( i ) Young students;
( ii ) The applicant's career aspirations and his or her contribution to public service; and
( iii ) Citizenship generally in a constitutional republic;
( 3 ) Applicant's proposed course of graduate study, including the name of the degree sought, the name of the required courses to be taken, and information about the specific degree sought;
( 4 ) Three evaluations that attest to the applicant's academic achievements and to his or her potential to become an outstanding secondary school teacher; and
( 5 ) A copy of his or her academic transcript.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CURTIS W. BERRY,

Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN I. BERRY,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00033

- CV

Appeal from

158th District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC # 2010

- 20587

- 158)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 256]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ256.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 659]]

Public Law 109-256
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
170 East Main Street in Patchogue, New York, as the ``Lieutenant Michael 
P. Murphy Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 1, 2006 -  [H.R. 4101]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 170 East 
Main Street in Patchogue, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
``Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 1, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4101 (S. 2722):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            May 2, considered and passed House.
            July 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Transport Transports Canada Canada TP 7245E


# AIRWORTHINESS DIREC TIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above
- referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport C an ada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952
- 4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1 - 800 - 305 - 2059 , or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 24
- 0022 (01
- 2005) 1 / 1 No

. CF - 20 1 2 - 19 Issue Date 1 2 June 2012

Number: CF - 20 1 2 - 19 Subject: Control Box Assembly Manufacturing Defect Effective: 25 June 2012 Applicability: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Inc. helicopter m odels 206A and 206B , serial

number s 4 and subsequent ; model 206L , serial number s 4500 4 through 4 5153 and 46601 through 46617 ; e quipped w ith c ontrol b o x a ssembly p art n umber 206 - 375 - 017 - 101 or 206 - 375 - 017 - 103 a s p art o f t he e ngine a uto - r elight k it
. Compliance: Within 4 months from the effective date of this AD , unless already accomplished. Backgroun d: It has been determined tha t control box assemblies , part number ( P/N ) 206
- 375
- 017
- 101

and 206
- 375
- 017
- 103 , have a manufacturing defect. The malfunction of the control box assembly will disable the auto
- relight system and the pilot will , in the event of an engine flame out , be required to re
- start the engine manually. This situation c ould result in an unsafe condition during flight and consequently, may lead to a loss of control of the helicopter. Corrective Actions: R eplace the applicable control box as sembly in accordance with the Accomplishment

Instruction in the applicable Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) dated 2 May 2011 or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. Model Control Box Assembly P art N umber ASB 206A and 206B Replace 206
- 375
- 017
- 101 with 206
- 375
- 017
- 105 206
- 11
- 127

206L Replace 206
- 375
- 017
- 103 with 206
- 375
- 017
- 107 206L
- 11
- 167

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities



### ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Derek Ferguson Chief, Conti nuing Airworthiness Contact: Bogdan Gajewski , Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613
- 952
- 4357, facsimile

613
- 996
- 9178 or e
- mail ADs@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 08-6340 

JEROME J. WEST,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional Center; A. KELLEY

HARRISON; DOCTOR MOBASHAR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:07-cv-00474-jct-mfu)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 19, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome J. West, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Jerome J. West appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. West v. Braxton, No. 7:07-

cv-00474-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. October 17, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 184.50 Prescription drug distribution and cost reporting by pharmacy benefit managers. ( a ) *General requirement.* In a form, manner, and at such times specified by HHS, any entity that provides pharmacy benefits management services on behalf of a qualified health plan (QHP) issuer must provide to HHS the following information: ( 1 ) The percentage of all prescriptions that were provided under the QHP through retail pharmacies compared to mail order pharmacies, and the percentage of prescriptions for which a generic drug was available and dispensed compared to all drugs dispensed;
( 2 ) The aggregate amount, and the type of rebates, discounts or price concessions (excluding *bona fide* service fees) that the pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) negotiates that are attributable to patient utilization under the QHP, and the aggregate amount of the rebates, discounts, or price concessions that are passed through to the QHP issuer, and the total number of prescriptions that were dispensed. ( i ) *Bona fide* service fees means fees paid by a manufacturer to an entity that represent fair market value for a bona fide, itemized service actually performed on behalf of the manufacturer that the manufacturer would otherwise perform (or contract for) in the absence of the service arrangement, and that are not passed on in whole or in part to a client or customer of an entity, whether or not the entity takes title to the drug.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) The aggregate amount of the difference between the amount the QHP issuer pays its contracted PBM and the amounts that the PBM pays retail pharmacies, and mail order pharmacies, and the total number of prescriptions that were dispensed.
( b ) *Limitations on disclosure.* Information disclosed by a PBM under this section shall not be disclosed by HHS or by a QHP receiving the information, except that HHS may disclose the information in a form which does not disclose the identity of a specific PBM, QHP, or prices charged for drugs, for the following purposes: ( 1 ) As HHS determines to be necessary to carry out section 1150A or part D of title XVIII of the Act;
( 2 ) To permit the Comptroller General to review the information provided;
( 3 ) To permit the Director of the Congressional Budget Office to review the information provided; or
( 4 ) To States to carry out section 1311 of the Affordable Care Act.
( c ) *Penalties.* A PBM that fails to report the information described in paragraph (a) of this section to HHS on a timely basis or knowingly provides false information will be subject to the provisions of section 1927(b)(3)(C) of the Act.
#### § 1321.37 Notification of State plan amendment receipt for changes not requiring Assistant Secretary for Aging approval.

The State agency shall submit an amendment not requiring Assistant Secretary for Aging approval as set forth at § 1321.31(b) to the appropriate ACL Regional Office. The ACL Regional Office shall review the amendment to confirm the contents do not require approval of the Assistant Secretary for Aging and will acknowledge receipt of the State plan amendment by notifying the head of the State agency in writing.
# 2004 Executive Calendars

**

----

   The Executive Calendar is published by the Executive Clerk’s office in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate. The calendar is published each day the Senate is in session. These calendars list executive business items such as unanimous consent agreements, resolutions, treaties, and nominations. The calendar is identified by the date published and a volume number, which both appear on the cover of the calendar. A final calendar is published at the end of each session of Congress. For a detailed summary of the sections of the Executive Calendar, see, About the Executive Calendar.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10318 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus THOMAS PEREZ, also known as Enrique Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-342-1-T

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Thomas Perez, also known as Enrique Perez, appeals from his sentence following conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Perez argues that the district court erred by increasing his offense level by three levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b) for being a manager or supervisor of a criminal activity involving five or more participants. Perez does not challenge the district court’s factual findings, but argues that the district court erred in concluding that its factual findings warranted application of § 3B1.1(b).No. 98-10318 -2- We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and the application of the sentencing guidelines de novo

. United States v. Sylvester , 143 F.3d 923, 931 (5th Cir. 1998). A finding that a defendant is a manager or supervisor pursuant to § 3B1.1(b) is a factual finding. United States v. Morris , 46 F.3d 410, 419 (5th Cir. 1995). A factual finding is not clearly erroneous if it is plausible in light of the entire record. Id. To qualify for this adjustment, Perez must have been the manager or supervisor of one or more other participants. § 3B1.1, comment. (n.2). The district court found that Perez warranted the § 3B1.1(b) adjustment because he handled the negotiations, he made trips back and forth between the parties, and the other coparticipants were acting as his assistants. Based on the testimony of the DEA agent and informant involved in the undercover operations leading to the arrest of Perez, Perez was acting as a manager or supervisor regarding two of his coparticipants. The district court did not err in applying § 3B1.1(b) to Perez’s sentence.
AFFIRMED.
§ 16.5 How the Board operates. ( a ) The Board's professional staff consists of a Chair (who is also a Board member) and full- and part-time Board members, all appointed by the Secretary; and a staff of employees and consultants who are attorneys or persons from other relevant disciplines, such as accounting.
( b ) The Chair will assign a Board member to have lead responsibility for each case (the “presiding Board member”). The presiding Board member will conduct the conference or hearing, if one is held. Each decision of the Board is issued by the presiding Board member and two other Board members.
( c ) The Board staff assists the presiding Board member, and may request information from the parties; conduct telephone conference calls to request information, to clarify issues, or to schedule events; and assist in developing decisions and other documents in a case.
( d ) The Chair will assure that no Board or staff member will participate in a case where his or her impartiality could reasonably be questioned.
( e ) The Board's powers and responsibilities are set forth in § 16.13.
§ 1631.13 Use of derivative income from sale of personal property purchased with LSC funds. ( a ) During the term of an LSC grant or contract, a recipient may retain and use income from any sale of personal property purchased with LSC funds according to 45 CFR 1630.17 (Cost Standards and Procedures: Applicability to derivative income) and 45 CFR 1628.3 (Recipient Fund Balances: Policy).
( b ) The recipient must account for income earned from the sale, rent, or lease of personal property purchased with LSC funds according to the requirements of 45 CFR 1630.17.
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under	

EO12866/13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA): Final Rule

Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and 

Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

RIN 2060-AQ91

1. Reviewer recommends adding language that more fully describes the modification 

concept to ensure that it is grounded in equipment changes. For example, enumerate the 

major changes of equipment changes (e.g., boilers, turbines, controls) and define 

modifications as changes in one or more of these categories that results in emissions 

increases above the threshold.

2. Reviewer recommends considering applying a 10% threshold to any modification that 

addresses a single major equipment change category and a 15% threshold to any

modification that combines multiple categories of modification.

3. Reviewer recommends providing additional discussion that ensures that modifications 

cannot be triggered based on hourly emissions increases in a single exceptional hour or a 

handful of exceptional hours (versus an annual average or similar metric).

4. Reviewer recommends limiting the definition of modifications to single projects that take 

place within a finite time period (e.g., a single outage). This would clarify the definition 

of modification and exclude ongoing multiphase enhancements.
# Party Table 3

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000This table was published on 4/3/15.
#### § 153.365 General oversight requirements for State-operated risk adjustment programs.

If a State is operating a risk adjustment program, it must keep an accounting of all receipts and expenditures related to risk adjustment payments and charges and the administration of risk adjustment-related functions and activities for each benefit year.

[78 FR 65094, Oct. 30, 2013]
#### § 171.300 Availability and effect of exceptions.

A practice shall not be treated as information blocking if the actor satisfies an exception to the information blocking provision as set forth in this subpart C by meeting all applicable requirements and conditions of the exception at all relevant times.
October 15, 2015

Mr. Adam Atwood

5503 N orth Westnedge Avenue

Kalamazoo, MI 49004

Dear Mr. Atwood :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your July 24, 2015, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3195 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please no te that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-31047

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT WRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-202-S

- - - - - - - - - -

December 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Wright has filed a pro se appeal from his guilty-plea

conviction for mail fraud. Wright argues that the district court

erred by denying his request to withdraw his guilty plea, by

failing to consider his pro se motion to dismiss based on double

jeopardy, and by failing to rule on the various motions he filed

along with his motion to withdraw his plea. Our review of the

record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no

reversible error was committed. Because Wright failed in his

burden of showing a fair and just reason for the withdrawal of 
No. 97-31047

-2-

his guilty plea, the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying his motion to withdraw his plea. See United States v.

Badger, 925 F.2d 101, 104 (5th Cir. 1991). Wright’s assertions

that the district court erred by failing to consider and rule on

various motions is refuted by the record. 

Wright’s motion to strike the Government’s brief is DENIED. 

His motions concerning a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding are DENIED

for lack of jurisdiction. Motion for bail DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 18-5261 September Term, 2019

1:16-cv-00259-BAH

Filed On: August 21, 2020 [1857632]

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in

Washington and Nicholas Mezlak, 

 Appellees

v.

Federal Election Commission, 

 Appellee

Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, 

 Appellant

O R D E R

 It is ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the Clerk withhold issuance of

the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing

or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41. This

instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party to move for

expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #18-5261 Document #1857632 Filed: 08/21/2020 Page 1 of 1