alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AGENCY:

National Forests in North Carolina, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of New Recreation Fee Site. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Forests in North Carolina will begin charging a special recreation permit fee for reserved use of picnic shelters on several sites on the National Forests in North Carolina. Members of the public have requested the ability to reserve use of a picnic shelter in advance of the day of proposed shelter use. There will be no charging for using a picnic shelter as long as no reservation is made. Reservations will be posted on site at least 24 hours in advance of the reservation time. The shelters are located at the Murray Branch Day Use Area on the Appalachian Ranger District, the Cheoah Point Day Use Area on the Cheoah Ranger District, the Old Fort Picnic Area and Mortimer Picnic Area on the Grandfather Ranger District, the Sycamore Flats Picnic Area and Pink Beds Picnic Area on the Pisgah Ranger District, the Cherokee Lake Picnic Area, Jackrabbit Day Use Area and Hanging Dog Day Use Area on the Tusquitee Ranger District, and at Kings Mountain Point Day Use Area on the Uwharrie Ranger District. The cost for reserved use of the shelters will vary between $25-$30 for a half day and $40-$50 for a whole day. The higher use fee will be charged for the larger capacity shelter at Kings Mountain Point Day Use Area. In addition, the National Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 reservation service fee. Fee revenue will support operations and maintenance of the shelters and future shelter site improvements.

# DATES:

The fee is scheduled for implementation in May of 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David H. Wright, Recreation Fee Coordinator, 828-257-4256, National Forests in North Carolina, PO Box 2750, Asheville, NC 28802.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. This new fee will be reviewed by a Recreation Resource Advisory Committee prior to a final decision and implementation. The National Forests in North Carolina presently has two recreation sites permitted to concession operators who charge a shelter use fee of $25 per half day for a two-table shelter to $35 per half day for a three-table shelter. Most sites have paved parking. Hanging Dog, Cherokee Lake, Mortimer and Murray Branch have designated gravel parking. In addition to picnic shelters with tables, all sites have picnic grills, flush or vault toilets on site, water on site or nearby, trash receptacles and information boards. People wishing to reserve a picnic shelter will need to do so through the National Recreation Reservation Service at                     *http://www.reserveusa.com*                     or by calling 1-877-444-6777.                

Start Printed Page 69532
Dated: November 3, 2006.

Marisue Hilliard,

National Forests in North Carolina Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 06-9477 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7067

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE ROE MATTHEWS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-91-382, CA-95-432-3-17)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Roe Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Matthews, Nos. CR-91-382; CA-95-432-3-17 (D.S.C. June 14, 1995). In

addition, we find sufficient evidence supports Matthews' 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c) conviction under the "carry" prong and that, therefore,

Bailey v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec.

6, 1995) (No. 94-7448), does not invalidate the conviction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Application of William Hahn, Appellant, to Review the Action of John T. Dooling et al., Composing the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Charles B. Page, Respondent.

*Matter of Hahn,*129 App. Div. 910, affirmed.

(Argued February 10, 1909;

decided March 2, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 24, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a summary review of the action of the Board of Elections of the City of New York in awarding a certificate of election to Charles B. Page, as executive mem*593ber and member of the county committee of the Republican party.

*Charles W. Coleman*for appellant.

*Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Terence Farley*of counsel), for John T. Dooling et al., respondents.

*Julius M. Mayer*for Charles B. Page, respondent.

*Gherardi Davis*for Republican County Committee, intervening.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
§ 150.457 Review by Administrator. ( a ) The Administrator of CMS (which for purposes of this subsection may include his or her delegate), at his or her discretion, may review in whole or in part any initial agency decision issued under § 150.453.
( b ) The Administrator may decide to review an initial agency decision if it appears from a preliminary review of the decision (or from a preliminary review of the record on which the initial agency decision was based, if available at the time) that: ( 1 ) The ALJ made an erroneous interpretation of law or regulation.
( 2 ) The initial agency decision is not supported by substantial evidence.
( 3 ) The ALJ has incorrectly assumed or denied jurisdiction or extended his or her authority to a degree not provided for by statute or regulation.
( 4 ) The ALJ decision requires clarification, amplification, or an alternative legal basis for the decision.
( 5 ) The ALJ decision otherwise requires modification, reversal, or remand.
( c ) Within 30 days of the date of the initial agency decision, the Administrator will mail a notice advising the respondent of any intent to review the decision in whole or in part.
( d ) Within 30 days of receipt of a notice that the Administrator intends to review an initial agency decision, the respondent may submit, in writing, to the Administrator any arguments in support of, or exceptions to, the initial agency decision.
( e ) This submission of the information indicated in paragraph (d) of this section must be limited to issues the Administrator has identified in his or her notice of intent to review, if the Administrator has given notice of an intent to review the initial agency decision only in part. A copy of this submission must be sent to the other party.
( f ) After receipt of any submissions made pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section and any additional submissions for which the Administrator may provide, the Administrator will affirm, reverse, modify, or remand the initial agency decision. The Administrator will mail a copy of his or her decision to the respondent.
( g ) The Administrator's decision will be based on the record on which the initial agency decision was based (as forwarded by the ALJ to the Administrator) and any materials submitted pursuant to paragraphs (b), (d), and (f) of this section.
( h ) The Administrator's decision may rely on decisions of any courts and other applicable law, whether or not cited in the initial agency decision.
#### § 2490.140 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
§ 1620.5 Annual review. ( a ) Priorities shall be set periodically and shall be reviewed by the governing body of the recipient annually or more frequently if the recipient has accepted a significant number of emergency cases outside of its priorities.
( b ) The following factors should be among those considered in determining whether the recipient's priorities should be changed: ( 1 ) The extent to which the objectives of the recipient's priorities have been accomplished;
( 2 ) Changes in the resources of the recipient;
( 3 ) Changes in the size, distribution, or needs of the eligible client population; and
( 4 ) The volume of non-priority emergency cases or matters in a particular legal area since priorities were last reviewed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

The undersigned, Diane J. Ryan, the Chief Financial Officer of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certifies that:



| |  | Dated: May 17, 2004                                   
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Diane J. RyanDiane J. Ryan
Chief Financial Officer

This
certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

---
In The Matter Of: NORTHEASTERN AVIATION CORP. Respondent 

### SERVED: JANUARY 9, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2012-1264 ) ) ) Case No. 2012EA110030 )

ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING On December 3, 2013, a Notice ofHearing Location was filed. This Notice informedthe. parties that the Hearing set for January 28-29, 2014, would be held at the U.S. District Court in Central Islip, NewYork. OnDecember 9, 2013, the Respondent filed a Notice ofSubstitution ofCounsel and Entry ofAppearance. This Notice withdrew

### Mf. James G. Ehrig as counsel ofrecord for the Respondent and substituted Mr. Edward J. Longosz and Ms. Evelyn D. Sahr. All three attorneys are from the law firm ofEckert Seamans Cherin & Merriott, LLC. OnJanuary 8, 2014, the FAA filed the Agency's Withdrawal ofComplaint stating that the FAA "withdraws its Complaint inthis matter[.]" Afterreviewing all relevant caselaw, regulations, statutory authority, andbeing fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

### 1. The Hearing set for January 28-29, 2014, inCentral Islip, NewYork is cancelled. 2. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, the FAAhas withdrawn its Complaint, and this • proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List'j


### FDMS No. FAA-2012-1264 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Mr. Zachary M. Berman Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. Edward J. Longosz Ms. EvelynD. Sahr Respondent's Counsel Eckert Seamans Cherin & 

### Mellot, LLC ONE COPY



### 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202-659..,6622 FAX: 202-659-6699 elongosz@eckerts.eamans.com dsahr@eckertseamans.com · Judge J.E. Sullivan, US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


        The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly appointed and
acting Chief Executive Officer of American National Financial, Inc., a
California corporation (the "Company"), and hereby further certifies as follows.

        1.     The periodic report containing financial statements to which this
               certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

        2.     The information contained in the periodic report to which this
               certificate is an exhibit fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
               the Company.

        In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.




Date:   August 9, 2002                         /s/ Michael C. Lowther
     --------------------               ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael C. Lowther
                                        Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1930

PETER HRONEK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-

339-1-CCB)

Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 16, 2003

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Hronek, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Peter Hronek appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

federal tort claims act complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Hronek v. Secretary, Dep’t of

Health & Human Servs., No. CA-03-339-1-CCB (D. Md. filed July 7,

2003 & entered July 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered October 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 19 - 01398 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 01399 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 01485 - CR DONNELL SLEDGE , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F17 - 56048, F17 - 56046, F17 - 5604 O RDER We REINSTATE this appeal

. We abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for the purpose of appoint ing new appellate counsel to represent appellant in his appeal , including but not limited to filing a response to State’s September 2, 2021 motion for rehearing

. On October 18, 2021, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’s app ointment of counsel.In light of this, we DIRECT the Clerk to remove Christie Merchant and to substitute Ron L. Goranson as counsel for appellant. We request that appellant’s counsel file appellant’s response to the State’s September 2, 2021 motion for rehearing WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF THIS ORDER

. /s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001068717
<NAME> RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,467
<INVENTORY>                                    172,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,683
<PP&E>                                         218,142
<DEPRECIATION>                               (121,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           208
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,672
<SALES>                                         70,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,508
<CGS>                                           59,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (149)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,585
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
§ 1171.4 Public availability of records. ( a ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), the NEH will make the following records available for public inspection in an electronic format (unless they are published and copies are offered for sale) without a FOIA request: ( 1 ) Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders made in the adjudication of cases,
( 2 ) Statements of policy and interpretations which have been adopted by the agency and are not published in the Federal Register,
( 3 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public,
( 4 ) Copies of all records, regardless of format, which have been released to any person under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) and which because of their subject matter, the NEH determines have become or are likely to become subject to subsequent requests for substantially the same records, or have been requested three (3) or more times; and
( 5 ) A general index of the records referred to in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The NEH will also maintain and make available for public inspection in an electronic format current indexes as required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) of the FOIA. However, since the NEH has determined that publication and distribution of these indexes is unnecessary and impracticable, the NEH will provide these indexes upon request at a cost not to exceed the direct cost of the duplication.
( c ) NEH proactively identifies records of interest to the public, such as past awards, press releases, grant guidelines, and grant terms and conditions, and makes these records available on the NEH's Web site at *www.neh.gov .* In addition, copies of the NEH's policy statements, information about the NEH's FOIA program, sample grant narratives, and other frequently requested records are available in the NEH's Electronic Library.
[79 FR 9415, Feb. 19, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 45, Jan. 3, 2017]
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### M A N D A T E

TO THE 175TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on May 13, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Mark A. Salazar, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04

- 14

- 00692

- CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2009CR9726

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to

withdraw filed by Salazar’s attorney is GRANTED, and the trial court’s order

is AFFIRMED as modified. It is ORDERED no costs shall be assessed against

Salazar in relation to his trial or this appeal because he qualifies as indigent

under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on July 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
#### § 156.1256 Other notices.

As directed by a Federally-facilitated Exchange, a health insurance issuer that is offering QHP coverage through a Federally-facilitated Exchange or a State-based Exchange on the Federal platform must notify its enrollees of material plan or benefit display errors and the enrollees' eligibility for a special enrollment period, included in § 155.420(d)(12) of this subchapter, within 30 calendar days after being notified by a Federally-facilitated Exchange that the error has been fixed, if directed to do so by a Federally-facilitated Exchange.

[81 FR 94183, Dec. 22, 2016]