alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----- Original Message

-----

From: Vineyard, Christine Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:13 AM To: Steckel, Andrew; Tharp, Lisa Cc: Wehling, Jefferson Subject: RE: Docket Number EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2014

- 0469 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Andy,

I just spoke to Mr. Brandon and he's aware that rule R18

- 2

- 727 was not in the notice we just had published. He wanted us to know that there are problems with the rule. I suggested he let ADEQ know his concerns when the rule is revised in 2015.

Christine

----- Original Message

----- From: Brandon, Michael W CIV USARMY USAG (US) [ mailto:michael.w.brandon6.civ@mail.mil ] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:18 AM To: Steckel, Andrew Cc: Ruerup, Charles F Jr CIV (US) Subject: Docket Number EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2014

- 0469 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

Mr. Steckel;

The proposed revisions to the ADEQ SIP seems to have excluded the rescission or substantial rewrite of R18

- 2

- 727 Spray Painting operations. The ADEQ presently enforces this rule for particulate control even though their enforcement guidance specifically states thatthe rule is intended to control VOC. As a VOC rule it is not enforceable

and not well defin ed because "96% control" is a moving target dependant on transfer efficiency and VOC content. The better the transfer efficiency and the lower the VOC content, the more unachievable and untenable this rule becomes. Although the architectural coating rule is better understood, and the evaluation of photo

- chemically reactive solvents is arcane.

It would seem that NSPS and Major/Area source MACT would be suitable for taking care of present day spray painting operations. If 96% control of overspray(???) is used, it is more stringent that the rules that were approved for the Maricopa County Ozone non

- attainment area (attached). Is it not a law that a nonattainment SIP cannot be any less stringent that the Statewide attainment SIP??

I propo se that R18

- 2

- 727 be added to the list for rescission, or the rule returned to ADEQ for rewrite to be at least as explicit as the Maricopa County rule.

Thank you for your time.

Michael W. Brandon Environmental Engineer Environmental Sciences Division US Army Garrison Yuma Proving Ground IMYM

- PWE 301 C Street Yuma, AZ 85365

928

- 328

- 6342

Interactive Customer Evaluation Link for Service Commenthttp://ice.disa.mil/index.cfm? fa=card&sp=94764&s=546&dep=*DoD&s

c=5

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE
EX-35 (e)

(logo) CHASE

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

RE:  Thornburg Mortgage Security Trust 2006-4: The Pooling and Servicing
     Agreement by and among Wells Fargo Bank as Master Servicer, Thornburg
     Mortgage Home Loans Inc as Seller, LaSalle Bank NA as Trustee and JPMorgan
     Chase Bank NA as Servicer (the "Agreement")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the Thornburg Mortgage
Security Trust 2006-4 (the "Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

     (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year
ending December 31, 2006 and of the performance of the Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such year.

Date: 02/28/2007

JPMorgan Chase Bank,
National Association,
as Servicer

By: /s/ Dave Lowman
Name:  Dave Lowman
Title: Executive Vice President
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00750

- CR

Larry CASTRO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District C ourt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0307A

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A supplemental record containing the trial court’s order appointing new appellate counsel

has been filed. We therefore reinstate the appeal on the docket of this court. The record is

complete. We order appellant’s brief due March 10, 2014

.

_________________________________ Luz El ena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Ke ith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–692 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4772, PRIVATE 

PROPERTY RIGHTS IMPLEMENTATION ACT OF 2006 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1047] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1047, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4772, the 

Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2006, under a 

closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the House 

equally divided and controlled by the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on the Judiciary. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute as reported by the Committee on the Judiciary shall be considered as adopted. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of H. Res. 

1000 (relating to a list of earmarks contained in the bill or report 

thereon). The Committee believes this waiver to be technical in nature as a review of the bill and report did not reveal any earmarks 

within the meaning of H. Res. 1000, and the Committee on the Judiciary failed to include a statement to that effect. 


CColeman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 251 

Date: September 27, 2006. 

Measure: H.R. 4772, Private Property Rights Implementation Act 

of 2006. 

Motion by: Mrs. Slaughter. 

Summary of motion: To report an open rule. 

Results: Defeated 2 to 6. 

Vote by Members: Hastings (WA)—Nay; Putnam—Nay; Capito—

Nay; Bishop—Nay; Gingrey—Nay; Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—

Yea; Dreier—Nay. 

Æ 


CColeman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
SENA1'E OF\ 1"'HE UNITED STATES 

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS 

Convened January 3, 1985 

FIRST SESSION { Adjourned December 20, 1985 

Convened January 21, 1986 

SECOND SESSION { 

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR 

Tuesday, July 29, 1986 

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JO-ANNE L. COE, 

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE 

By Gerald A. Hackett, Executive Clerk 
RESOLUTION OVER, UNDER THE RULE 

S. Exec. Res. 445--To discharge the Committee on Foreign Relations of further 

consideration of the SALT II Treaty. Submitted July 15, 1986, by Mr. Quayle. 
1 

TREATIES 

Calendar Treaty Subject Reported 

No. Doc. No. Bv 

5 EX. Q, Tax Convention with Denmark Dec 11, 85 Reported 

96-2 favorably, with a 

resolution of advice and 

consent to ratification 

without reservation, by 

Mr. Evans, Committee on 

Foreign Relations (Printed 

report--Ex. Rept. 99-5) 

6 98-12 Protocol to Amend the 1980 Tax Convention Do. 

with Denmark 

NOMINATIONS 

Calendar Message Nominee, Office, And Predecessor Reported 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

* 823 802 Morton I. Abramowitz, of Massachusetts, a May 20, 86 Mr. Lugar, 

Career Member of the Senior Foreign Committee on Foreign 

Service, Class of Career Minister, to be Relations, with printed 

an Assistant Secretary of State. (New report - Ex.Rept. 99-14. 

Position) Together with minority 

views. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

* 895 957 George R. Salem, of Virginia, to be Jun 18, 86 Mr. Hatch, 

Solicitor for the Department of Labor, Committee on Labor and 

vice Francis X. Lilly, resigned. Human Resources, without 

printed report. 
2 

- Calendar Mes!>.:1.ge Nominee, Office, And Predecei,sor Repor1.ed 

* 

* 

* 

No. No. Bv 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

915 1047 M. D. B. Carlisle, of the District of Jun 25, 86 Mr. Warner, Columbia, to be an Assistant Secretary of Committee on Armed 

Defense, vice Russell A. Rourke, resigned. Services, without printed 

report. 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

930 1162 Kathleen W. Lawrence, of Virginia, to be Jul 16, 86 Mr. Helms, 

Under Secretary of Agriculture for Small Committee on Agriculture, Community and Rural Development, vice Nutntion, and Forestry, Frank W. Naylor, Jr. without printed report 

931 1163 Kathleen W. Lawrence, of Virginia, to be a Do. 

Member of the Board of Directors of the 

Commodity Credit Corporation, vice Frank 

W. Navlor. Jr . . . . *S1gmf1es nom1nee's commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly 

constituted committee of the Senate. 

-
3 

NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY'S DESK IN THE 

SERVICE 

SENIOR FOREIGN 

Senior Foreign Service nomination of Edwin G. Corr, which was received by the Senate and 

appeared in the Congressional Record of October 28, 1985.
049–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–654 

PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF H. RES. 1000, PROVIDING FOR EARMARKING REFORM IN THE HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1003] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1003, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that upon adoption of the resolution, H. 

Res. 1000, providing for earmarking reform in the House of Representatives, as reported by the Committee on Rules, is hereby 

adopted. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with HEARING
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 110 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating 

to ‘‘Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the National Park Service relating to ‘‘Alaska; Hunting 

and Trapping in National Preserves’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Na4 tional Park Service relating to ‘‘Alaska; Hunting and 

5 Trapping in National Preserves’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 55059 

6 (July 3, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or ef7 fect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IIA 

Calendar No. 35 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 10 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs relating to ‘‘Reproductive Health Services’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. TUBERVILLE (for himself, Mr. LANKFORD, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. SCOTT

of Florida, Mr. THUNE, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. CRUZ, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. 

WICKER, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

LEE, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. VANCE, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. HAWLEY, 

Mr. CASSIDY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BUDD, Ms. ERNST, 

Mr. DAINES, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

HAGERTY, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. RICKETTS, and Mr. YOUNG) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

APRIL 18, 2023 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to ‘‘Reproductive Health Services’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SJ 10 PCS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Veterans Affairs relating to ‘‘Reproductive 

5 Health Services’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 55287; published Sep6 tember 9, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or ef7 fect. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 35 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 10 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chaprelating to ‘‘Reproductive Health Services’’. submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

APRIL 18, 2023 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Hillsborough,

No. 5352.

#### Joseph P. Whelton & *a. v.*State.

Argued June 1, 1965.

Decided June 30, 1965.

*Keeley*& *Whelton {Mr. Charles F. Keeley*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*William*Maynard, Attorney General and *R. Peter Shapiro,*Assistant Attorney General *{Mr. Shapiro*orally), for the defendant.

Wheeler, J.

This case is an appeal from the decision of a highway layout commission under the provisions of RSA 233:17. On October 2, 1964 the State took by eminent domain a portion of the plaintiffs’ property located in Nashua. A tender of $1,000 was made which was refused and the plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court.

The plaintiffs requested that the damages be assessed by the Court. The State in its answer to the plaintiffs’ appeal petition admitted all the allegations therein except the contention that the amount awarded for the taking was grossly unfair and requested that damages be assessed by the jury.

The plaintiffs’ motion that damages be assessed by the Court was denied and their exceptions were reserved and transferred by *Griffith,*J.

The pertinent statute (RSA 233:17) providing for an appeal by a landowner “aggrieved” by the decision of a layout commission provides in part: “Any owner of land or other property who has not accepted payment of the sum tendered and who is aggrieved by the decision of the commission in the assessment of damages may appeal therefrom to the superior court for the *363county in which such land ... is situate . . . and the court shall assess the damages by jury, or by the court without the jury, and award costs to the prevailing party.”

It was early held in this jurisdiction that there was no absolute right to trial by jury in eminent domain proceedings and none was conferred by Pt. I, *Art.*20th of N. H. Constitution. *Petition of Mt. Washington Road Co.,*35 N. H. 134, 143 (1857).

The contention of the plaintiffs here is that the statutory authority existing at the time of the taking granted the State no right to trial by jury but that only the aggrieved landowner was given such a right by Laws 1954, 1:3 now RSA 233:17.

The defendant concedes that at common law there was no right to trial by jury in eminent domain cases and none was conferred by Pt. I, *Art.*20th of our Constitution. However it rightly contends that judicial and public policy dictate that where the right of trial by jury does exist the right is bilateral and may be invoked by either party. In 1954 the Legislature saw fit under certain circumstances' in land-taking cases to permit the State “. . . the same right of appeal and jury determination of award as is herein provided for aggrieved owners.” Laws 1954, 1:1 (now RSA 233:18). We do not read into the statute (RSA 233:17) anything which denies the State the right to jury trial in the case of appeal by the owner. In the denial of the plaintiffs’ motion that damages be assessed by the Court we see no error.

The order therefore is

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 109 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Management and 

Budget relating to ‘‘Enhancing Transparency Through Use of the Investing in America Emblem on Signs’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of Management and Budget relating to ‘‘Enhancing Transparency Through Use of the Investing in 

America Emblem on Signs’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Of4 fice of Management and Budget relating to ‘‘Enhancing 

5 Transparency Through Use of the Investing in America 

6 Emblem on Signs’’ (CA–23–6, published on February 24, 

7 2023, as a Controller Alert, and a letter of opinion from 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 109 IS 

1 the Government Accountability Office dated August 29, 

2 2024, printed in the Congressional record on September 

3 9, 2024, on pages S5872–S5875, concluding that such 

4 Controller Alert is a rule under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

5 States Code), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
MEMO

To: File

From: S.Thomas

Date: June 10,2010

Subject: Audit Hearing

The Audit staff called The Bartlett for Congress Committee (BFC) to remind them that the deadline to

request an audit hearing is today, June 10,2010. Per the treasurer, Robert Perry, the committee has

waived the request for the hearing and did not think a response was necessary and would not be able to

send a response via email because he is currently offsite. He said, "I expressed this to Ashley and I am

glad she in turn expressed this to you, but I will not be able to respond in writing and I do know what her

schedule is like." The audit staff informed Mr. Perry that Ashley was contacted several times, but could

not be reached. In a previous conversation with the committee it was expressed that they did not see

the need for a hearing. This was also restated in this conversation with the treasurer. He said he

appreciated the courtesy call and the call ended.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Digital Gas, Inc.; Order of Suspension of 
Trading

November 17, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Digital Gas, Inc. (``Digital''), because of questions raised regarding 
the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information 
concerning, among other things, Digital's announced agreement with 
Techno Rubber, Inc. and Digital's assets.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, November 17, 
2006, through 11:59 p.m. EST, on December 4, 2006.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9332 Filed 11-17-06; 11:31 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 1206.8 How do you operate the grant program? ( a ) The Executive Director manages the program under Commission guidance and the immediate administrative direction of its Chairman, the Archivist of the United States.
( b ) The Commission establishes grant program priorities as reflected in its grant opportunity announcements and, from time-to-time, issues non-binding, clarifying guidance documents through the NHPRC Web site.
( c ) To assure fair treatment of every application, all members of the Commission and its staff follow conflict-of-interest rules, available on the NHPRC Web site at *http://www.archives.gov/nhprc*.
( d ) The purpose and work plan of all NHPRC-funded grant projects must be in accord with current Commission program guidance as reflected in the grant opportunity announcements.
( e ) The Commission makes funding recommendations to the Archivist of the United States, who has the authority to award grants.
[71 FR 27624, May 12, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 66317, Oct. 28, 2010; 79 FR 76080, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 2400.2 Annual competition.

To achieve its principal purposes, the Foundation holds an annual national competition to select teachers in grades 7-12, college seniors, and college graduates to be James Madison Fellows.
#### § 162.900 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________

)

CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

) Civil Action No. 19-2336 (JEB)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant, )

)

and ) NOTICE OF FILING

)

HILLARY FOR AMERICA, et al., )

)

Intervenor-Defendants. )

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S NOTICE OF FILING

OF CERTIFIED LIST OF ADMISTRATIVE RECORD DOCUMENTS

IN MATTER UNDER REVIEW 7146

The Federal Election Commission provides notice of the filing of the Certified List of 

Administrative Record Documents in Matter Under Review 7146 pursuant to the Court’s 

November 21, 2019 Order (Doc. No. 22).

Respectfully submitted,

Lisa J. Stevenson /s/ Robert W. Bonham III

Acting General Counsel Robert W. Bonham III (D.C. Bar. No. 397859)

lstevenson@fec.gov Senior Attorney 

rbonham@fec.gov 

Kevin Deeley

Associate General Counsel COUNSEL FOR

kdeeley@fec.gov FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

1050 First Street NE

Washington, D.C. 20463

January 6, 2020 (202) 694-1650

Case 1:19-cv-02336-JEB Document 25 Filed 01/06/20 Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of )
) LRA 1096

Request for Consideration of Legal )

Questions submitted by Mike Braun for)

Indiana )
CERTIFICATION

I, Laura E, Sinram, recording secretary for the Federal Election Commission
executive session on June 20, 2019, do hereby certify that the Commission decided by a vote
of 4-0, on an amended pre-meeting tally, to conclude that the Committee may not repay the
Candidate in excess of $250,000 more than 20 days after the primary election and reject the
Committee’s argument that the candidate loan repayment requirements are unconstitutional,
as recommended in the Memorandum to the Commission dated May 23, 2019.

Commissioners Hunter, Petersen, Walther, and Weintraub voted affirmatively for the

decision.
Attest:
lau lia Ce
Date Laura E. Sinram

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission