alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger P. Deschenes, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Roger P. DeschenesRoger P. DeschenesVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 16, 2011










This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0001068237
<NAME>                             SSB Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                56,602,126
<SECURITIES>                            (820,951)
<RECEIVABLES>                            225,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      56,006,597
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        56,006,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,328,512
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                            54,678,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          56,006,597
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      (5,240,747)
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,097,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (6,338,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                          (6,338,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (71.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accredo Health, Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David D. Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ David D. Stevens
-------------------------
David D. Stevens
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2004
#### § 51.104 Has OMB approved the collection of information?

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed and approved the information collection requirements contained in this Part and assigned OMB Control No. 1024-0029. We use this information to administer the National Park Service concessions program, including solicitation, award, and administration of concession contracts. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. You may send comments on the information collection requirements to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW., (2601), Washington, DC 20240.

[79 FR 58263, Sept. 29, 2014]
#### Town of Pelham, Respondent, *v.*John M. Shinn, Appellant.

*Town of Pelham*v. *Shinn,*139 App. Div. 30, affirmed.

(Argued January 7, 1909;

decided January 26, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 5,1908, which affirmed an interloe utory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to tin *549complaint in an action for an accounting of moneys received and disbursed by the defendant as supervisor of the town of Pelham.

The following question was certified : *“*Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*Benjamin L. Fairchild*for appellant.

*Henry G. K. Heath*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
#### § 1331.3 Availability of grants.

ACL awards grants to States subject to availability of funds, and if applicable, subject to the satisfactory progress in the State's project during the preceding grant period. The criteria by which progress is evaluated and the performance standards for determining whether satisfactory progress has been made are specified in the terms and conditions included in the notice of grant award sent to each State. ACL advises each State as to when to make application, what to include in the application, and provides information as to the timing of the grant award and the duration of the grant award. ACL also provides an estimate of the amount of funds that may be available to the State.
§ 162.1000 General requirements. When conducting a transaction covered by this part, a covered entity must meet the following requirements: ( a ) *Medical data code sets.* Use the applicable medical data code sets described in § 162.1002 as specified in the implementation specification adopted under this part that are valid at the time the health care is furnished.
( b ) *Nonmedical data code sets.* Use the nonmedical data code sets as described in the implementation specifications adopted under this part that are valid at the time the transaction is initiated.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 49 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 49

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
Relations Board relating to a ``Standard for Determining Joint Employer 
                               Status''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2023

 Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Braun, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
    Marshall, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. Paul) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
Relations Board relating to a ``Standard for Determining Joint Employer 
                               Status''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to a 
``Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status'' (88 Fed. Reg. 73946 
(October 27, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.15



                                SECOND AMENDMENT

                           TO LEASE DATED MAY 3, 1994
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
                      JOHN G. B. ELLISON, JR. ("LANDLORD")
                                       AND
                    VES, INC., D/B/A VES EXTRUSIONS, INC. AND
                   ELLISON EXTRUSION SYSTEMS, INC., ("TENANT")

      Effective July 1, 1999 this Second Amendment replaces ARTICLE V, Section
5.02, and adds to ARTICLE X, Section 10.02 of the Lease Dated May 3, 1994, by
and between John G.B. Ellison, Jr., LANDLORD and VES, Inc., TENANT

REPLACE ARTICLE V, SECTION 5.02 WITH THE FOLLOWING:

      "REAL PROPERTY TAX. TENANT shall reimburse LANDLORD for all real property
taxes and assessments on the premises in excess of $4,900 due annually."

ADD THE FOLLOWING TO ARTICLE X, SECTION 10.02:

      "TENANT shall reimburse LANDLORD for the cost of property insurance on
premises that is in excess of $600 annually."

      ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

TENANT:                                 VES Inc., a Delaware Corporation


                                        By: /s/ C. Douglas Cross
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           C. Douglas Cross, President




(CORPORATE SEAL)


ATTEST:

/s/ Elaine M. Roberts
---------------------------------------
Elaine M. Roberts, Assistant Secretary


LANDLORD:

                                            /s/ John G. B. Ellison, Jr. (SEAL)
                                            -------------------------
                                              John G. B. Ellison, Jr.
#### § 170.400 Basis and scope.

This subpart implements section 3001(c)(5)(D) of the Public Health Service Act by setting forth certain Conditions and Maintenance of Certification requirements for health IT developers participating in the ONC Health IT Certification Program.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arrayit Corporation.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rene A. Schena certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 

| |  | 
| |  | 

| |  | 
| |  | 

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 







|                         | Arrayit Corporation   
|------------------------ | ----------------------
|                         |                       
|Dated: November 20, 2012 | By: /s/ RENE A. SCHENA
|                         | Rene A. Schena        
|                         | Chairman and Director
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 29 

Providing for the reappointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2023 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. PETERS) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 

Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43) the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Michael Govan of 

8 California on May 6, 2023, is filled by the reappointment 

9 of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of six 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 29 IS 

1 years, beginning on the later of May 6, 2023, or the date 

2 of enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 1321.85 Supportive services. ( a ) Supportive services are community-based interventions set forth in the Act under Title III, part B, section 321 (42 U.S.C. 3030d) which meet standards established by the Assistant Secretary for Aging. They include in-home supportive services, access services, which may include multipurpose senior centers, and legal services.
( b ) State agencies may allow use of Title III, part B funds for acquiring, altering or renovating, or constructing facilities to serve as multipurpose senior centers, in accordance with guidance as set forth by the Assistant Secretary for Aging.
( c ) For those Title III, part B services intended to benefit family caregivers, such as those provided under sections 321(a)(6)(C), 321(a)(19), and 321(a)(21) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 3030d(a)(6)(C), 3030d(a)(19), and 3030d(a)(21)), State and area agencies shall ensure that there is coordination and no inappropriate duplication of such services available under Title III, part E.
( d ) All funds provided under Title III, part B of the Act must be distributed within a State pursuant to § 1321.49 or § 1321.51.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 60754 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
OCTAVIA JERMAINE WINTERS, also known as Jermaine Octavia Winters , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 57

- 5

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Octavia Jermaine Winters appeals his 120

- month sentence of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction for theft of a firearm from a licensed dealer. Winters argues that the Government breached the terms of the plea agreement wherein it agre ed to recommend a sentence in the lower 50% of the guidelines range and to dismiss the remaining counts in the indictment. He argues that the inclusion of relevant conduct to calculate his

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED Novemb er 17, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-60754 Document: 00514241857 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2017No. 16

- 60754

2 guidelines range constituted a breach. Winters further also chall enges the calculation of his offense level and his criminal history score. The Government moves to dismiss the appeal or , alternatively, for summary affirmance based on the appeal waiver provision in Winters’s plea agreement. Although “an alleged breac h of a plea agreement may be raised despite a waiver provision,” United States v. Roberts , 624 F.3d 241, 244 (5th Cir. 2010), our review of the record shows that the Government did not breach the plea agreement as its conduct was not clearly or obviously i nconsistent with a reasonable understanding of its obligations, see Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 133

- 38 (2009); United States v. Hinojosa , 749 F.3 d 407, 411, 413 (5th Cir. 2014)

. Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRAN TED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternative motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. Case: 16-60754 Document: 00514241857 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2017
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1678

OMAR SALEM HELABI, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-563-431) Submitted: November 9, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth F. Liberstein, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D.McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Nelda C. Reyna, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Omar Salem Helabi, a native and citizen of Yemen, petitions this court for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his application for asylum. After a through review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Helabi did not qualify for asylum because he was “firmly resettled” in Saudi Arabia prior to coming to the United States. See § 8 C.F.R. 208.14(a)(2) (2001); Mussie v. INS , 172 F.3d 329, 331-32 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 150.309 Request for extension.

In circumstances in which an entity cannot prepare a response to CMS within the 30 days provided in the notice, the entity may make a written request for an extension from CMS detailing the reason for the extension request and showing good cause. If CMS grants the extension, the responsible entity must respond to the notice within the time frame specified in CMS's letter granting the extension of time. Failure to respond within 30 days, or within the extended time frame, may result in CMS's imposition of a civil money penalty based upon the complaint or other information alleging or indicating a violation of PHS Act requirements.

[64 FR 45795, Aug. 20, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 13440, Feb. 27, 2013]
§ 9.120 What terms and conditions apply to all operators? The following terms and conditions apply to all operators: ( a ) The operator/permittee is responsible for ensuring that all of its employees and contractors and subcontractors comply fully with all of the requirements of this subpart;
( b ) The operator/permittee may not use any surface water or groundwater owned or administered by the United States that has been diverted or withdrawn from a source located within the boundaries of a System unit unless the use has been approved in accordance with NPS policy;
( c ) The operator/permittee must provide the NPS an affidavit, signed by an official who is authorized to legally bind the company, stating that proposed operations are in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations and that all information submitted to the NPS is true and correct;
( d ) The operator/permittee must agree to indemnify and hold harmless the United States and its officers and employees from and against any and all liability of any kind whatsoever arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of the operator and its employees, agents, representatives, contractors, and subcontractors in the conduct of activities under the operations permit; and
( e ) The operator/permittee must agree to take all reasonable precautions to avoid, minimize, rectify, or reduce the overall impacts of your proposed oil and gas activities to System units. You may be required to mitigate for impacts to NPS resources and lost uses. Mutually agreed-upon mitigation tools for this purpose may include providing or restoring alternative habitat and resources to offset those impacts by the operations.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Michigan Community Bancorp Limited,
(the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Janet C. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/      Janet C. Smith
   --------------------------------------------
         Janet C. Smith
         Chief Financial Officer
         August 14, 2002






















                                       18
§ 154.220 Timing of providing the rate filing justification. A health insurance issuer must submit applicable sections of the Rate Filing Justification for all single risk pool coverage in the individual or small group market, as follows: ( a ) For rate increases for coverage effective prior to January 1, 2016: ( 1 ) If a State requires that a proposed rate increase be filed with the State prior to the implementation of the rate, the health insurance issuer must submit to CMS and the applicable State the Rate Filing Justification on the date on which the health insurance issuer submits the proposed rate increase to the State.
( 2 ) For all other States, the health insurance issuer must submit to CMS and the State the Rate Filing Justification prior to the implementation of the rate increase.
( b ) For coverage effective on or after January 1, 2017, by the earlier of the following: ( 1 ) The date by which the State requires submission of a rate filing; or
( 2 ) The date specified in guidance by the Secretary.
[80 FR 10864, Feb. 27, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 12336, Mar. 8, 2016]