alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                 Exhibit 10.21






                                    January 11, 2001

DeWayne Laird
565 Fox Meadow Lane
West Chester, PA 19382

Dear DeWayne:

      This letter memorializes the resolutions approved by the Board of
Directors of Autotote Corporation (the "Company"), on August 30, 2000 and
September 7, 2000, concerning your continued employment. The Board approved the
following five terms:

      1. TERM: Subject to earlier termination for cause, death, or disability,
the term of your employment shall be extended, effective September 1, 2000,
through and until August 31, 2003 (the "Term").

      2. POSITION: During the Term, you will serve as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company. You will report directly to the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company (the "CEO") and shall have such duties and
authority consistent with your title as shall be reasonably assigned to you from
time to time by the CEO or the Board of Directors.

      3. SALARY: Effective September 1, 2000, your annual salary has been
increased to $250,000 and will be increased annually on each succeeding
September 1 thereafter by an amount not less than a percentage of your annual
salary then in effect equal to the percentage increase, if any, during the
preceding twelve months in the Consumer Price Index for Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.

      4. BENEFITS: During the term you will be entitled to participate in any
and all benefit plans and programs of the Company that are made available to its
senior executives, including the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan.

      5. COMPENSATION UPON CHANGE IN CONTROL: If your employment is terminated
without cause within two years of a Change in Control, as defined in the
agreement between you and the Company, dated as of November 1, 1997 (the "Change
in Control Agreement"), you will be entitled to receive, in lieu of any payment
under the Change in Control Agreement, a cash payment in an amount equal to
three times the sum of (i) your annual salary on the date of such termination
and (ii) the Severance Annual Incentive Amount, as defined in the Change of
Control Agreement.

                                       1
<PAGE>



DeWayne Laird
January 11, 2001
Page 2




      You and Autotote agree that the terms contained in this letter will be
memorialized in a formal employment agreement. Please indicate your acceptance
of these terms by countersigning this letter below and returning it to my
attention.

                                          Very truly yours,



                                          A. Lorne Weil
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chairman of the Board

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:


--------------------------                -------------------
      DeWayne Laird                             Date


                                       2
Searched for **https://www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/docs/2003-128sp.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/docs/2003-128sp.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 4 43 P A 1 6

Filed 22 December 2017

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. RONNIE PAUL GODBEY

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 31 of a unanimous decision
of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 9 2 S.E.2d 8 20 (201 6 ), finding no error
after appeal from a judgment entered on 8 December 201 4 by Judge Christopher W.
Bragg in Superior Court, Rowan C ounty. Heard in the Supreme Court on

13 December 2017

.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Anita LeVeaux , Special Deputy Attorney General, and Sherri Horner Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for the State

. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by James R. Grant , Assistant Appellate Def ender, for defendant

- appellant

.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report for Bit-X Financial Corp. (the“Company”) on

Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange

Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned,Paul E. Heney, Chief Executive Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

 

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the

Financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

By:

 

 

/s/ Paul E. Heney

Paul E. Heney

Chief Executive Officer

April 30, 2015
<PAGE>





                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1

                                302 CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Woodworth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Pulitzer Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003


/s/ Robert C. Woodworth
-----------------------
Robert C. Woodworth
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                      -28-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 57 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 387
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 57

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury relating to ``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 
                                Funds''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2024

  Mr. Schmitt (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Braun, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Hagerty, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Johnson, 
    Ms. Lummis, Mr. Budd, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Ricketts) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

                              May 14, 2024

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury relating to ``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 
                                Funds''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to 
``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds'' (88 Fed. Reg. 
80584 (November 20, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 387

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury relating to ``Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 
                                Funds''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 14, 2024

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
§ 212.1 General definitions. When used in this part: ( a ) *Act* means section 1113 of the Social Security Act, as amended;
( b ) The term *Secretary* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services;
( c ) The term *Department* means the Department of Health and Human Services;
( d ) The term *Administration* means the Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services;
( e ) The term *Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary for Children and Families;
( f ) The term *eligible person* means an individual with respect to whom the conditions in § 212.3 are met;
( g ) The term *State* includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam;
( h ) The term *United States* when used in a geographical sense means the States;
( i ) The term *agency* means State or local public agency or organization or national or local private agency or organization with which the Assistant Secretary has entered into agreement for the provision of temporary assistance pursuant to the Act;
( j ) The term *temporary assistance* means money payments, medical care, temporary billeting, transportation, and other goods and services necessary for the health, or welfare of individuals, including guidance, counseling, and other welfare services.
[39 FR 26548, July 19, 1974, as amended at 53 FR 36580, Sept. 21, 1988; 60 FR 19864, Apr. 21, 1995]
#### Farrar *et al.*v. Phenix Insurance Company, appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment entered on a report of a referee in favor of plaintiffs.

The action was brought by Chilion M. Farrar and John Trefts, against The Phenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn, to recover for materials furnished and work done by plaintiff in repairing a steam boiler. Workmen who had assisted in making the repairs testified that jt was well done. On the part of the defense, it was shown that the first time the boiler was used, after repairs, it leaked, but some of the witnesses attributed the leaking to the failure of defendant to keep enough water in the boiler. The referee before whom the cause was tried, having found for the plaintiff on the evidence, the general term refused to disturb the finding.

*Thad. C. Davis,*for appellant.

*Williams & Potter,*for respondent

Mullin, P. J.

*Judgment affirmed.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0313

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

ROLLIN RODNEY GREY IV,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until June 3, 2024, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 25 2024

04/25/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0313
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shiner International,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Qingtao
Xing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:         
      March 25, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Qingtao XingName:
      Qingtao XingTitle:
      President and Chief Executive
Officer







This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1544 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited eligibility 

for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat service during 

certain periods of hostilities and war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2009 

Mr. DRIEHAUS (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for 

veterans of combat service during certain periods of hostilities and war. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Mental 

5 Health Accessibility Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1544 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNLIMITED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR 

2 MENTAL ILLNESSES FOR VETERANS OF COM3 BAT SERVICE DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF 

4 HOSTILITIES AND WAR. 

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1710(e)(1) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(F) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a vet9 eran who served on active duty in a theater of combat 

10 operations (as determined by the Secretary in consultation 

11 with the Secretary of Defense) during World War II, the 

12 Korean conflict, the Vietnam Era, the Persian Gulf War, 

13 Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, 

14 or any other period of war after the Persian Gulf War, 

15 or in combat against a hostile force during a period of 

16 hostilities (as defined in section 1712A(a)(2)(B) of this 

17 title), is eligible for hospital care, medical services, and 

18 nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 

19 mental illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient 

20 medical evidence to conclude that such illness is attrib21 utable to such service.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subparagraph (F) of section 

23 1710(e)(1) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 

24 subsection (a), shall apply with respect to hospital care, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1544 IH

1 medical services, and nursing home care provided on or 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Devon THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-2280.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 3, 2004.

James C. Mitchell, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Bay City, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel G. Van Norman, Lapeer, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GIBBONS, COOK, Circuit Judges, and OLIVER, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Solomon Oliver, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Mario Thomas appeals the district court’s sentencing calculation because the court rejected his plea agreement’s drug quantity calculation. We affirm.

Thomas concedes he failed to object to his sentence but he contends the court *738committed plain error by sentencing him contrary to his plea agreement. The parties’ briefs, and our study of both the appellate record and the applicable law, convince us that the district court did not err in sentencing Thomas consistent with the undisputed drug quantity evidence rather than the plea agreement’s mistaken calculation. The district court warned Thomas before accepting his plea that the agreement did not bind the court and the court followed every other provision of the plea agreement. Because the district court did not err, much less commit plain error, we affirm.
#### Alfred P. Boller, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

*Boiler*v. *City of New Toth,*134 App. Div. 930, affirmed.

(Argued February 11, 1909;

decided March 2, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Feb*596ruary 26, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract for services.

*L. Laflin Kellogg*and *Franklin Nevius*for appellant.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*and *Terence Farley*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Hot voting: Willard Bartlett, J.
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF NANCY ERICKSON,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS

We dn e sday, J an u ary 5, 2011

FIRST SESSION {

SECOND SESSION {

Issue No. 1

CONVENED J ANUARY 5, 2011

http://www.senate.gov/ExecutiveCalendar
Note :

The Executive Calendar is not published unless there are n ominations and/or treaties on it.

Addition ally, n ominations and/or treaties that are reported out of committee, placed on th e Executive 

Calendar, an d confirm ed/agr eed to all in th e sam e day will n o t appear on th e next Executive Calendar.
RESOLUTIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

S. RES.

NO.

SUBJ ECT

REPORTED

BY

1
TREATIES

CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJ ECT

REPORTED

BY

2
TREATIES

CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO.

SUBJ ECT

REPORTED

BY

3
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
NOTICE OF INTENT TO OBJ ECT TO PROCEEDING

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO.

NOMINEE AND OFFICE DATE AND SENATOR

5

When following the objection to a unanimous consent request to proceeding to, and, or passage of, a measure or matter on their

behalf, a Senator has notified the appropriate leader, or their designee, in writing and submits such objection for inclusion in the 

Congressional Record and the Senate Executive Calendar, it shall be placed in the section of the Executive Calendar entitled “Notice 

of Intent to Object to Proceeding”. (Sec. 512, P.L. 110-81)
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

DATE SUBJ ECT

6

 After an action taken by the Senate, any Senator voting with the prevailing side or who has not voted may, on the same day o r on 

either of the next two days of actual session thereafter, either enter a motion for reconsideration or move a reconsideration. This section 

contains such motions not yet acted on as so provided by Rule XIII, Paragraph 1.
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING
                                     OF THE
                               BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                       OF
                                   SATX, INC.

         The undersigned, constituting all of the directors of the above named
corporation, hereby consent in writing, pursuant to NRS 78.315, to the adoption
of the following recitals and resolutions.

AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE STOCK

         RESOLVED, that Merritt Jesson, President and CEO, be and hereby is
authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of SATX, Inc and to take whatever
action is necessary to cause 75,000 shares of the common stock of SATX, Inc. to
be issued to Valori Pearson, (employee) as a stock bonus with S-8 registration
rights.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that all shares and warrants so issued will NOT be
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 ("1933 Act"). If appropriate the
certificates evidencing the Shares shall bear restrictive legends as appropriate
and will be subject to appropriate stop transfer orders to the respective
transfer agents. The Company shall be under no obligation to register the Shares
under the 1933 Act or any state securities law for resale by the individual or
entity who is issued the Shares.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Unanimous Consent may be executed
simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Unanimous
Consent to be effective the 30th day of November 2000.

         /s/ MERRITT JESSON                    /s/ ROBERT ELLIS
         -------------------                   ----------------------
         Merritt Jesson                        Robert Ellis