alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF U.S. LABORATORIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         273,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,405,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                   649,283
<INVENTORY>                                    747,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,158,413
<PP&E>                                       3,132,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                 673,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,062,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,042,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,010
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,536,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,062,884
<SALES>                                     15,941,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,941,958
<CGS>                                        8,975,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,377,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             127,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,425,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                   618,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,425,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   806,948
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1682

STEVE STONE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF OHIO; JOANN F. SCOTT,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CA-03-19)

Submitted: September 10, 2003 Decided: October 10, 2003

Before WIDENER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Stone, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steve Stone appeals the district court’s order dismissing this

case pursuant to the domestic relations exception to federal

diversity jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Stone v. Ohio, No. CA-03-19 (W.D.N.C.

filed May 16, 2003; entered May 19, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Village of Potsdam, Appellant. The Potsdam Electric Light and Power Company, Respondent.

*Matter of Village of Potsdam,*127 App. Div. 932, affirmed.'

(Argued February 9, 1909;

decided February 23, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 7, 1908, which affirmed an order of the state commission of gas and electricity denying an application for a certificate of authority to establish an electric lighting system for *591supplying the inhabitants of the village of Potsdam with electric light.

*Clarence S. Ferris*and *A. X. Parker*for appellant.

*Louis L. Waters*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
**Exhibit 34.3**

Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying Report on Compliance with Applicable ServicingCriteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, that FDI Collateral Management (the “Company’’), a wholly-ownedsubsidiary of Trivin, Inc., complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for thetitle servicing platform as of and for the year-ended December 31, 2006, exceptfor 1122(d)(l)(ii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii)(D), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv) and1122(d)(4)(iii)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable tothe activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform coveredby this report. See Management’s Assertion for the asset backed transactionscovered by this platform. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance withstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactionsand securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of theservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, ourprocedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurredeither prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balancesor amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered bythis report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that theCompany complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for theyear-ended December 31, 2006 for the title servicing platform is fairly stated,in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Hartford, ConnecticutFebruary 26, 2007

 

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

s0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137775

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137775 COA: 274069 Montmorency CC: 05-000963-FC 05-001127-FC; 05-001130-FC GERALD EUGENE FLETCHER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 9, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between Washington Mutual Bank, as servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR8 for the 2006 fiscal year (the “RelevantYear”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 17.6 Advance notice.

Any respondent or prospective respondent in an agency proceeding shall, if practicable and consistent with the nature of the proceeding, be given advance notice of information to be released about the proceeding and a reasonable opportunity to prepare in advance a response to the information released.
```

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 222 (Friday, November 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 66919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9285]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  11 a.m., Friday, December 8, 2006.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9285 Filed 11-15-06; 3:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
§ 1330.20 Peer review purpose. The purpose of peer review is to insure that: ( a ) Those activities supported by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) are of the highest scientific, administrative, and technical quality; and
( b ) Activity results may be widely applied to appropriate target populations and rehabilitation problems.
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Salomon  Smith  Barney  Global
Diversified  Futures Fund L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period
ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel R. McAuliffe,  Jr., Chief Financial
Officer and Director of Smith Barney Futures  Management LLC, certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director
November 14, 2002
FS Form 3782 Department of the Treasury | Bureau of the Fiscal Service Revised December 2020

SERIES HH

SAVINGS BONDS

Table of Interest Payments ($1,000 Denomination)

For the Months January 2021 - December 2021

The “Year of Issue” and “Month of Issue” shown in the table are the month and year of issue shown on each bond 

directly beneath the caption “Issue Date.” Series H bonds were issued from June 1952 through December 1979. All 

Series H bonds have reached final maturity and do not earn interest. Series HH bonds were issued from January 

1980 through August 2004.

Interest is payable semiannually on the first day of the month shown in the column headed “Interest 

Payments” next to the year and month of issue. Bonds with issue dates not shown in the table have 

reached final maturity and earn no interest.

Bonds reach original maturity ten years from their issue dates. Series HH bonds issued since January 1980 have been 

granted one ten-year extension and reach final maturity twenty years from their issue dates.

YEAR OF 

ISSUE

MONTH OF 

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT 

MONTH OF

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT

MONTH OF

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT

2002

Thru

2003

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

JULY

AUGUST

MARCH

APRIL

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

MAY

JUNE

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

YEAR OF 

ISSUE

MONTH OF 

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT 

MONTH OF

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT

MONTH OF

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT

2001

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

JULY

AUGUST

MARCH

APRIL

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

MAY

JUNE

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

*FINAL INTEREST PAYMENT All Series HH bonds earn interest at a flat rate of 1.5%

YEAR OF 

ISSUE

MONTH OF 

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT 

MONTH OF

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT

MONTH OF

ISSUE

INTEREST PAYMENTS

MONTH AMOUNT

2004

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

JULY

AUGUST

MARCH

APRIL

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

MAY

JUNE

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50

$ 7.50
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigneds knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated:   April 8, 2011/s/   Dimitri J. AndritsoyiannisDimitri   J. AndritsoyiannisVice   President and Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLANCA BEATRIZ TUCUX,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73031

Agency No. A072-536-415

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Blanca Beatriz Tucux, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

terminate proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

de novo questions of law and claims of constitutional violations in immigration 

FILED

JAN 06 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73031

proceedings, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny

the petition for review.

 The BIA did not err or violate due process in denying Tucux’s motion to

terminate where she failed to demonstrate that she filed a timely motion to reopen

or an application for suspension of deportation required for relief under the

Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.43(e)(1), (2); see also Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)

(requiring error and prejudice for a petitioner to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 2 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 3 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 4 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 5 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 6 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 7 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 8 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 9 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 10 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 11 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 12 of 13
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 153 Filed 12/30/09 Page 13 of 13
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Victory Divide Mining Company
File No.  0-52127

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Victory  Divide  Mining  Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A.  Little,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: February 9, 2007                           By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ----------------                              ----------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Victory Divide Mining Company and will be retained by Victory Divide
Mining Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
****Exhibit 32.1****

****IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, AnthonyArmini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|        | ** ** | **/s/**Anthony Armini   |
|--------|------------|-------------------------|
|   |       | Anthony Armini          |
|   |       | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |       | July 31, 2006           |

 

----
#### § 204.1 Submittal of State plans for Governor's review.

A State plan under title I, IV-A, IV-B, X, XIV, XVI(AABD) of the Social Security Act, section 101 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or title I of the Mental Retardation Facilities and Community Mental Health Centers Construction Act, must be submitted to the State Governor for his review and comments, and the State plan must provide that the Governor will be given opportunity to review State plan amendments and long-range program planning projections or other periodic reports thereon. This requirement does not apply to periodic statistical or budget and other fiscal reports. Under this requirement, the Office of the Governor will be afforded a specified period in which to review the material. Any comments made will be transmitted to the Family Support Administration with the documents.

(Sec. 1102, 49 Stat. 647 (42 U.S.C. 1302))

[39 FR 34542, Sept. 26, 1974, as amended at 53 FR 36579, Sept. 21, 1988]
S. Con. Res. 35 Agreed to May 6, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL OF THE 

CAPITOL. 

The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol are authorized to be used on January 20, 2025, by the Joint Congressional 

Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the 

President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.