alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAT ROBERTS 

KMtSAS AGRICULTURE 

109 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-1605 

20^-224-4774 

tittp://roberts.ssnBte.gov 

BnitaJ States Senate 

WASHINGTON. DC 20510-1605 

Octobers, 2010 

FINANCE 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

LABOR, AND PENSIONS 

ETHICS 

RULES 

J ' ' 

"^: 

j J 

u . j 

- S - —. -

*, i _r . ." .--

r.-i-' m 

--^"^•''' 1 

-—t— ' 

'--;:-.-'-;^' 

,'. 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

I write in support of the application from the Manhattan, Kansas Regional Airport for the 

Small Community Air Service Development Program grant. I appreciate your taking the time to 

review their proposal. 

The Manhattan Regional Airport (MHK) is located in north central Kansas and serves 

the Manhattan area and several small rural communities located nearby. The airport also plays 

an important travel rote for soldiers and civilians traveling from nearby Fort Riley. 

The Manhattan Regional Airport seeks funding to increase ACA passenger use 

retention from 18 percent to 30 percent. The increase in passenger demand will ensure the 

current service is self-sustaining and will also be a driving force for additional flights, larger 

aircrafts and new destinations. To achieve this increase In traffic, they plan to use different 

types of marketing and advertising that will include traditional media, websites, community 

marketing and events. Additionally, this funding would allow the Manhattan Regional Airport to 

provide both a convenient and affordable option for air travel to the local community. 

Air service is an essential transportation element in the state of Kansas. I continue to 

support the aviation industry, from manufacturing airplanes to landing them safely in our 

communities. I am conftdent that this grant would be of great benefit to Manhattan and the state 

of Kansas. Please accept this letter as recognition of my support for this project and grant 

application. 

With every best vwsh, 

PR:rm
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1515 

To assist courts in the States and territories with improving the 

administration of justice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2009 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To assist courts in the States and territories with improving 

the administration of justice. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVING THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 

4 BY STATE COURTS. 

5 (a) GRANT AUTHORIZED.—The Attorney General is 

6 authorized to award a grant to an eligible entity to im7 prove the administration of justice by State courts through 

8 training, education, technical assistance, information serv9 ices, research and implementation of best practices for 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1515 IH

1 court operations, and any other activities the Attorney 

2 General determines to be appropriate. 

3 (b) GRANTEE REQUIREMENTS.— 

4 (1) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—For the purposes of 

5 this section, the term ‘‘eligible entity’’ means a na6 tional nonprofit organization with experience in car7 rying out the activities and providing the services de8 scribed in subsection (a). 

9 (2) APPLICATION.—An eligible entity desiring a 

10 grant under this section shall submit an application 

11 to the Attorney General at such time, in such man12 ner, and containing such information as the Attor13 ney General may require. 

14 (c) CONSULTATION.—In carry out and prioritizing 

15 the activities authorized under this section, the grantee 

16 under this section shall consult with, and shall consider 

17 any recommendations from, the Conference of Chief Jus18 tices and the Conference of State Court Administrators. 

19 (d) ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE.—The Attorney Gen20 eral may provide additional assistance to the grantee 

21 under this section to carry out the activities authorized 

22 under subsection (a). 

23 (e) DEFINITION OF STATE.—In this section, the term 

24 ‘‘State’’ means any State, territory, or possession of the 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1515 IH

1 United States, the District of Columbia, and the Common2 wealth of Puerto Rico. 

3 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

4 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

5 $4,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 

6 2014, which shall remain available until expended. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Pauline M. Bacon, Respondent, *v.*Alvin E. Saeger, Appellant.

*Bacon*v. *8aeger,*119 App. Div. 917, affirmed.

(Argued January 27,1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered *580May 17,1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover the value of certain gas fixtures alleged to have been converted by defendant.

*George E. Zartman*for appellant.

*J. N. Hammond*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur; Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Resubmission of the Proposed Final 

Audit Report on the National Campaign 

Fund(A09-26) 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Federal Election 

Commission, do hereby certify that on October 22,2012, the Commission 

decided by a vote of 6-0 to approve the Resubmission of the Proposed Final 

Audit Report on the National Campaign Fund (A09-26), as recommended in the 

Memorandum from the Chief Compliance Officer and Audit Division dated 

October 17,2012. 

Commissioners Bauerly, Hunter, McGahn n, Petersen, Walther, and 

Weintraub voted affirmatively for the decision. 

Attest: 

Date ' Shawn Woodhead Werth ( 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Coleman and Bray 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

MARY ELLEN GUILFOYLE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 0118-96-1 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY 

 JULY 9, 1996 

JOSEPH CHARLES GUILFOYLE 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 

Jerome B. Friedman, Judge 

 J. Russell Fentress, IV (Goss, Meier & 

Fentress, on brief), for appellant. 

 No brief or argument for appellee. 

 Acting on remand from this Court, the trial court awarded 

Mary E. Guilfoyle (wife) spousal support of $2,300 per month from 

Joseph C. Guilfoyle (husband) and ordered husband to pay $4,000 

of wife's attorney's fees. On appeal, wife complains that these 

awards are inadequate. We disagree and affirm the decision of 

the trial court. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record, and a 

recitation of the facts is unnecessary to this appeal. Under 

well established principles, a trial court is vested with broad 

discretion in awarding both spousal support, see Papuchis v. 

Papuchis, 2 Va. App. 130, 133, 341 S.E.2d 829, 831 (1986), and 

attorney's fees, see Graves v. Graves, 4 Va. App. 326, 333, 357 

S.E.2d 554, 558 (1987), and we review such decrees only for an 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

abuse of discretion. See Graves, 4 Va. App. at 333, 357 S.E.2d 

at 558; Papuchis, 2 Va. App. at 133, 341 S.E.2d at 831. 

 Here, we find that the trial court properly considered the 

appropriate statutory imperatives in fixing the disputed spousal 

support and did not abuse its discretion in awarding such support 

or the related attorney's fees. Accordingly, we affirm the 

decree. 

 Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 67542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Prescott National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Arizona.

ACTION: Notice of New Fee Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Prescott National Forest will begin charging a $150 fee 
for the daily rental of historic Groom Creek Schoolhouse near Prescott, 
Arizona. Rental of other facilities on the Prescott National Forest and 
other Arizona National Forests has shown that publics appreciate and 
enjoy the availability of historic rental facilities. Funds from the 
rental will be used for the continued operation and maintenance of 
Groom Creek Schoolhouse.

DATES: Groom Creek Schoolhouse will become available for rent April, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor, Prescott National Forest, 344 S. Cortez 
St, Prescott, Arizona, 86303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Schmidgall, Facility Engineer, 
Prescott National Forest, 928-443-8177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established. The Prescott National Forest 
currently has three other rental facilities. These rentals are booked 
regularly throughout their rental season. A business analysis for the 
rental of Groom Creek Schoolhouse shows that people desire having this 
sort of recreation experience on the Prescott National Forest. A market 
analysis indicates that the $150 daily fee is both reasonable and 
acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. People 
wanting to rent Groom Creek Schoolhouse will need to do so through the 
National Recreation Reservation Service, at http://www.reserveusa.com 
or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National Recreation Reservation 
Service charges a $9 fee per reservation.

    Dated: November 14, 2006.
Alan M. Quan,
Forest Supervisor, Prescott National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06-9294 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Don
      Headlund ,
      the
      Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Global Axcess Corp
      (the
      "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended August
      31,
      2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or 15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 25, 2007





/s/ Don
      Headlund


Name: Don
      Headlund


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, C.E. Andrews, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Private Credit Student LoanTrust 2006-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;     4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, theservicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement andadministration agreement, in all material respects; and     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by The Bank of NewYork, as indenture trustee.Date: March 23, 2007   /s/ C.E. Andrews   C.E. Andrews  Chief Financial Officer  SLM Funding LLC
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 04-1330 GLORIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. JO ANNE BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Daniel R. Domínguez, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Selya, Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges .
Salvador Medina de la Cruz on brief for appellant. H.S. Garcia , United States Attorney, Lisa E. Bhatia , Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert J. Triba , Regional Chief Counsel, and Lisa G. Smoller , Assistant Regional Counsel, on brief for appellee.
September 21, 2004PerCuriam . After carefully considering th e re cord and

briefs on appeal, we affirmthe judgment.

The appellant essentially argues that the ALJ should have consulteda voca tional expert before concluding that she was not disabled, given her m ental impairment. Under Ortiz v. Sec'y. Health and Human Services , 890 F.2d 520, 526 ( 1 st Cir. 1989), however, the ALJ could rely on the Grid a lone if her mental limitations were adequately accommodated by rel eg ating her to unskilledwork. Given the record, the ALJ could reasonably conclude that she could perform unskilled work. Se e Rodriguez v. Sec'y. of Health and Human Ser vs. , 647 F.2d 218, 222 (1 st Cir. 1981). Affirmed . 1st Cir. Rule 27(c).

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 75 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 75

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for 
   Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2024

Mr. Ricketts (for himself, Mr. Sullivan, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Lankford, Mr. 
 Marshall, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Thune, Mr. Cassidy, 
 Mr. Manchin, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Braun, Mr. Lee, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Daines, 
 Mr. Boozman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Risch, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Scott of Florida, 
  Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Budd, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Moran, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. 
   Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Vance, Mr. 
  Hoeven, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Tillis, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
 Kennedy, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Grassley, Mrs. Hyde-
 Smith, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Graham, Mr. Cornyn, Ms. Collins, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
  Romney, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. McConnell) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for 
   Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later 
Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles'' (89 Fed. Reg. 27842 (April 18, 
2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### Alvan W. Perry, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin L. M. Bates, Appellant.

*Perry*v. *Bates,*133 App. Div. 893, affirmed.

(Argued January 25, 1909;

decided February 9, 1909.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart*574ment, entered November *22,*1907, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover commissions.

*Charles F. Brown, John B. Stanchfield*and *John Delahunty*for appellant.

*Howard Taylor*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ; Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
Exhibit
32.1





Chief
Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven R.
Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
      7, 2010
                /s/ Steven R. LewisSteven
      R. LewisPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:43 AM

To: 'Dave Brown'

Cc: Rios, Gerardo; Shane Young; Sloan, William M.; Dave Dun; Christenson, Kara

Subject: RE: SPI Anderson - Change in primary contact - FYI

Dave,

Thanks for the update.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

Permits Office, Air Division 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Dave Brown [mailto:DBrown@spi-ind.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:48 PM 

To: Kelly, Shaheerah 

Cc: Rios, Gerardo; Shane Young; Sloan, William M.; Dave Dun; Christenson, Kara 

Subject: SPI Anderson - Change in primary contact - FYI 

Shaheerah – We’re making a change in primary contact for SPI related to the Anderson PSD permit – please use Shane

Young as the primary SPI contact moving forward.  Below is Shane’s contact information

Shane Young

Facility Manager

Sierra Pacific Industries – Anderson Division

19758 Riverside Avenue

PO Box 10939

Anderson, CA  96007

530‐378‐8350 ph

530‐378‐8360 fax

swyoung@spi‐ind.com

Thank you,

David C. Brown, PE

Environmental Affairs & Compliance Manager

Sierra Pacific Industries

19794 Riverside Avenue

Redding, CA 96049-6028

(530) 378-8179

(530) 378-8139 fax

(530) 391-7650 cell

 

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This communication and any accompanying or attached document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the 

sole use of the addressee(s). If you receive this communication in error, you are advised that any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in 

reliance upon this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately telephone Sierra Pacific Industries at (530) 378-

8179, and delete this message without copying it. Thank you.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 

[71 FR 69149, November 29, 2006]. 

# Status:

 Open Meeting. 

# Place:

 100 F Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:

 Monday, December 4, 2006 at 10 a.m. 

# Change in the Meeting:

 Deletion of Items. 

The following items will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Monday, December 4, 2006: 

1. The Commission will consider whether to propose a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933 to revise the criteria for natural persons to be considered “accredited investors” for purposes of investing in certain privately offered investment vehicles. 

2. The Commission will consider whether to propose a new rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to prohibit advisers from making false or misleading statements to investors in certain pooled investment vehicles they manage, including hedge funds. 

The Commission determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: December 1, 2006. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 06-9562 Filed 12-1-06; 4:04 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# PAC Table 10c

&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000This table was generated on 8/31/23.