alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**


**FLEX
      FUELS ENERGY, INC.**


**FORM
      10-KSB/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Paul
      Gothard, am the Chief Financial Officer of Flex Fuels Energy, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection
      with
      the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) of the Company
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission ("Annual Report").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 12, 2007By:
                */s/ Paul Gothard*
              Paul
                  Gothard
              Chief
                Financial Officer (acting Principal Accounting Officer) and
                Director
#### Eggler, plaintiff in error, v. People.

*Criminal law—new trial on the merits*— *verdict—opinions of "witnesses—provocation.*

A new trial cannot be granted in a criminal case in this State on the merits by an appellate court, except in certain cases where the power to do so is conferred by statute. *People*v. *Thompson,*41 N. Y. 1. If there was evidence sufficient to submit the question of the prisoner’s guilt to the jury, their verdict, upon the evidence, is not open to review upon the merits.

Where, upon a trial for murder, no question was made which could render it material whether the deceased died of. a wound in the heart, or of another, in a different place, inflicted by the prisoner at the same time and with the same weapon: *Held,*that it was not erroneous to allow the physician who made the *post-mortem*examination to give his opinion that the wound in the heart caused the death. *Beal*v. *People,*55 Barb. 552. If it was error it would furnish no ground for a reversal of the judgment. *People*v. *Gomales,*35 N. Y. 49; *People*v. *White,*55 Barb. 606; *Shorter*v. *People,*2 N. Y. 193.

*797The provocation under which the prisoner acted must be judged of by the *res gestas;*and, as a general rule, the evidence must be confined to the facts and circumstances attending the transaction.

Even if it be competent to permit the former school teacher of the person killed to state the facts in respect to her conduct while at school, it is not error to exclude his *opinion*as to her violent and aggressive temper.

Error to the Cayuga oyer and terminer to review the trial o£ Charles Eggler convicted of murder in the first degree for killing Etta Conklin in Locke in said county.

*E. D. Jackson*and *M. Goodrich,*for plaintiff in error.

*S. E. Payne,*district attorney, for the people.

Morgan, J.

The points passed upon in the opinion are stated in the head-note, and a publication of the opinion at length is not believed necessary.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS73275 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

_______________________________________

)

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2:15-cv-00439-DB

)

v. )

) JOINT STIPULATION AND

JEREMY JOHNSON, ) ORDER

)

Defendant. ) District Judge Dee Benson

 ) Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

TO EXTEND OR CLARIFY STAY

Plaintiff Federal Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) and defendant Jeremy 

Johnson, by and through their respective counsel, state as follows:

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties are engaged in advanced discussions to settle this 

matter, but require additional time to seek final approval of mutually agreeable terms; 

WHEREAS, Johnson is currently incarcerated, which creates delay in communicating

with him and obtaining his approval of final settlement terms;

WHEREAS, the Commission currently has three members but lacks a quorum of four

members that would be necessary to formally approve any negotiated settlement in this matter; 

WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, the United States Senate Committee on Rules 

Administration held a hearing on the nomination of James E. Trainor III to be a member of the 

Commission, but has not yet voted whether to recommend the nomination to the full Senate;

WHEREAS, the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has created additional 

difficulties in finalizing settlement discussions;

NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE COURT’S APPROVAL, IT IS HEREBY 

Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB-DBP Document 162 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATED AND AGREED that:

1. The parties’ stipulated Motion to Stay is granted (ECF No. 160) and all proceedings

and deadlines in this matter shall be stayed until the Commission regains a complement of at 

least four FEC Commissioners;

2. The parties shall promptly notify the Court when the Commission regains a 

complement of at least four Commissioners. In addition, the parties shall file approved 

settlement documents or a joint status report proposing a schedule for further proceedings in this 

matter, if necessary, within 60 days after the date the Commission regains four members. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATE: March 23, 2020. ______________________________

Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead

Case 2:15-cv-00439-DB-DBP Document 162 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 180.110 Failure to request a hearing. ( a ) If a hospital does not request a hearing within 30 calendar days of the issuance of the notice of imposition of a civil monetary penalty described in § 180.90(b), CMS may impose the civil monetary penalty indicated in such notice and may impose additional penalties pursuant to continuing violations according to § 180.90(f) without right of appeal in accordance with this part. ( 1 ) If the 30th calendar day described in this paragraph (a) is a weekend or a Federal holiday, then the timeframe is extended until the end of the next business day.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) The hospital has no right to appeal a penalty with respect to which it has not requested a hearing in accordance with § 150.405 of this title, unless the hospital can show good cause, as determined at § 150.405(b) of this title, for failing to timely exercise its right to a hearing.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAINEARTH INC. for the year
ended April 30, 2010, I, Zhu, YongFu, President and Chief Executive Officer of
RainEarth Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

|(1) | such Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year
      ended April 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of RainEarth
  Inc..



|                      | /s/
      Zhu, YongFu                
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2010 | Zhu, YongFu                          
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 21

                         Company Subsidiaries

    Name of Subsidiary                      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
    ------------------                      -----------------------------

 International Vision Associates, Ltd.                 Georgia

 Mexican Vision Associates, S.A. de C.V.               Mexico

 Mexican Vision Associates Operadora, S.               Mexico
 de R.L. de C.V.

 Mexican Vision Associates Servicios, S.               Mexico
 de R.L. de C.V.

 Midwest Vision, Inc.                                 Minnesota

 NVAL Healthcare Systems, Inc.                         Georgia

 NVAL Visioncare Systems of California,              California
 Inc.

 Frame-n-Lens Optical, Inc.                          California

 Vision Administrators, Inc.                         California

 ProCare Eye Exam, Inc.                              California

 Family Vision Centers, Inc.                          Delaware

 New West Eyeworks, Inc.                              Delaware

 Alexis Holdings, Inc.                                 Arizona

 Vista Eyecare Network, LLC                           Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ACCREDO HEALTH, INCORPORATED FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068887
<NAME> ACCREDO HEALTH, INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,836
<INVENTORY>                                     14,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,577
<PP&E>                                           3,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,699
<BONDS>                                         38,602
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,324
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,790
<SALES>                                        176,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,907
<CGS>                                          155,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,843
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the eleventh meeting of the American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

November 28, 2006, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​ce_​main.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup members will continue discussion on a personal health record.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast at                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​ce_​instruct.html.*

Dated: October 20, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-8969 Filed 10-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
#### § 1800.5 Access to requested information to the individual.

Upon verification of identity the Foundation shall disclose to the individual the information contained in the record which pertains to that individual.
1 

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-16-00494-CR 

________________ 

KRISTOFER GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-22134

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 On December 21, 2016, Kristofer Garcia filed notice of appeal of his 

conviction in Trial Cause No. 15-22134. The trial court granted a motion for new 

trial while it maintained plenary power over the case. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.8(a). 

On January 17, 2017, we notified the parties that unless our jurisdiction over the 

appeal was established, the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. No 

reply has been filed. 
2 

 The notice of appeal invoked the Court’s appellate jurisdiction to review a 

judgment of conviction that has been vacated. The Court finds it lacks jurisdiction 

over the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. The State of Texas filed a 

motion to have the mandate issue immediately, and Garcia’s counsel has indicated 

that he does not object. Therefore, the motion to issue the mandate early is granted, 

and we direct the clerk of the Court of Appeals to issue the mandate immediately. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c). 

 APPEAL DISMISSED. 

________________________________ 

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

Chief Justice 

Submitted on February 21, 2017 

Opinion Delivered February 22, 2017 

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 22
- 00232
- CV

Phillip G. Scott , Appellant

v. Sergeant Haines , Appellee

FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR T FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, SAN ANTONIO DIVISION, CIVIL ACTION NO. SA
- 22
- CV
- 327
- OLG , HONORABLE ORLANDO L. GARCIA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Ph illip G. Scott, acting pro se, has filed a notice of appeal attempting to invoke this Court ’ s jurisdiction over the order of a federal district court in San Ant o n io , Texas. This Court ’ s civil appellate jurisdiction is limited to state “civil cases within its district of which the district courts or county courts have jurisdiction.” See Tex. Gov ’ t Code Ann. § 22.220

. Because Scott ’ s notice of appeal pertains to a n order signed by a federal judge in a federal ac tion, this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Quaak v. Isbel , No. 03

- 11

- 00466

- CV , 2011 WL 3373298, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Aug. 5, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.). On May 19, 2022, t h e clerk of this Court sent n otice to Scott asking him to explain how this Court could exercise jurisdiction in this matter, requesting that his response be filed by May 31, 2022, and warning that the failure to reply could result in the dismissal of this ap p eal. See Te x. R.2 App. P. 42. 3. To date, Scott has not r esponded to this Court ’ s n otice. For th ese reasons , we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

___________________________________ _______ Thomas J. Baker , Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Bake r, and Triana Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: June 23, 2022
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00433

- CV

Herman D. Greer v. C.O. Robert Reaux, et al.
On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 17

- 1650

- CV

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No c osts are assessed due to appellant ’ s inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified bel ow for observa nce. February 27 , 2020
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

h0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

146019(36)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146019

COA: 308515

Genesee CC: 2006

- 018410

- FC

ANTHONY DEVARO JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 29,

2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00429

- CR

WILLIAM XU APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

--------- -

We have considered a ppellant = s “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal. ” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant th e motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 7, 2011

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited



|      |  |                                                 |  |                        
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|S. No |  | Name of the Company                             |  | Country ofIncorporation
|1     |  | Copper Mines of Tasmania Proprietary Limited    |  | Australia              
|2     |  | Thalanga Copper Mines Proprietary Limited       |  | Australia              
|3     |  | Monte Cello B.V.                                |  | Netherland             
|4     |  | Bharat Aluminium Company Limited                |  | India                  
|5     |  | Sterlite Infra Limited                          |  | India                  
|6     |  | Talwandi Sabo Power Limited                     |  | India                  
|7     |  | Sterlite (USA) Inc.                             |  | USA                    
|8     |  | Hindustan Zinc Limited                          |  | India                  
|9     |  | Sterlite Energy Limited                         |  | India                  
|10    |  | Fujairah Gold FZE                               |  | UAE                    
|11    |  | THL Zinc Ventures Limited                       |  | Mauritius              
|12    |  | THL Zinc Limited                                |  | Mauritius              
|13    |  | THL Zinc Holding B.V.                           |  | Netherland             
|14    |  | THL Zinc Namibia Holdings (Proprietary) Limited |  | Namibia                
|15    |  | Skorpion Zinc (Proprietary) Limited             |  | Namibia                
|16    |  | Skorpion Mining Company (Proprietary) Limited   |  | Namibia                
|17    |  | Namzinc (Proprietary) Limited                   |  | Namibia                
|18    |  | Amica Guesthouse (Proprietary) Limited          |  | Namibia                
|19    |  | Rosh Pinah Health Care (Proprietary) Limited    |  | Namibia                
|20    |  | Black Mountain Mining (Proprietary) Limited     |  | South Africa           
|21    |  | Vedanta Lisheen Holdings Limited                |  | Ireland                
|22    |  | Vedanta Lisheen Mining Limited                  |  | Ireland                
|23    |  | Killoran Lisheen Mining Limited                 |  | Ireland                
|24    |  | Killoran Lisheen Finance Limited                |  | Ireland                
|25    |  | Lisheen Milling Limited                         |  | Ireland                
|26    |  | Sterlite Ports Limited                          |  | India                  
|27    |  | Sterlite Infraventures Limited                  |  | India                  
|28    |  | Vizag General Cargo Berth Private Limited       |  | India                  
|29    |  | Paradip Multi Cargo Berth Private Limited       |  | India                  
|30    |  | Pecvest 17 Proprietary Limited                  |  | South Africa           
|31    |  | Lakomasko B.V.                                  |  | Netherlands
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

First California Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-144617 and No. 333-141391) of our report dated March 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of First California Financial Group, Inc. andSubsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/    MOSS ADAMS LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 28, 2008