alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2522.580 What performance measures am I required to submit to the Corporation? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 46034 , May 28, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction published at 89 FR 66615 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) When applying for funds, you must submit, at a minimum, the following performance measures: ( 1 ) One set of aligned performance measures (one output, one intermediate-outcome, and one end-outcome) that capture the results of your program's primary activity, or area of significant activity for programs whose design precludes identifying a primary activity; and
( 2 ) Any national performance measures the Corporation may require, as specified in paragraph (b) of § 2522.590.
( b ) For example, a tutoring program might use the following aligned performance measures: ( 1 ) Output: Number of students that participated in a tutoring program;
( 2 ) Intermediate-Outcome: Percent of students reading more books; and
( 3 ) End-Outcome: Number and percent of students who have improved their reading score to grade level.
( c ) The Corporation encourages you to exceed the minimum requirements expressed in this section and expects, in second and subsequent grant cycles, that you will more fully develop your performance measures, including establishing multiple performance indicators, and improving and refining those you used in the past. Any performance measures you submit beyond what is required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may or may not be aligned sets of measures.
[70 FR 39603, July 8, 2005]
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1865 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 145 ) VI-C- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20083:22:20PM

Sheet 145of 198P. 2 

# A-83-2 7 VI-C- 1 *

•AU

G 2 3 198 8 Mr
. Willia m B
. Mar

x Presiden t Counci l o f Industria l Boile r Owner s 581 7 Burk e Centr e Parkwa y Burke , Virgini a 2201 5 Dea r Mr . Marx : Durin g th e Augus t 10 , 1988 , meetin g betwee n representative s o f CIB O and EP At o discus s CIBO' s petitio n fo r reconsideratio n o f th e ne wsourc e performanc e standar d fo r industria l boilers , CIB O presente d a propose d compromis e ne wsourc e performanc e standar d (copyenclosed) . W e pla n t o conside r thi s proposa l alon g wit hth e concern s CIB O presente d i n thei r petitio n t o reconsider . W e expec t t o complet e ou r evaluatio n b yth e en

d o f thi s year . Sincerely , 

### SIGNE Db.^«L»-»j Do n R . Cla y Actin g Assistan t Administrato r fo r Ai r an

d Radiatio n Enclosur eP. 3

fc 

# Gib ®

COUNCI LO FINDUSTRIA LBOILE R OWNER S PRESIDEN T *»»l" « INDUSTRIA L BOILE RNSP S Fo r Coa l PrimaryFue l Fire d Boilers :

1. 2 l bS0 2 /MM BT

U(greate r tha n 10 0 M MBTU/hr ) an

d n o percen t reductio n exclusio n fro

memissio n limit s during period s o f start up , shut-down , an

d malfunctio n n o continuou s emissio n monitoring fo r SO 2 an d NOx ; us e monthl yaverag e fue l analyse s (a s mined ) NOxlimi t fo r preheate d ai r unit s (les s tha n 70,00 0 BTU/hr/ft 3 ) o f 0. 4 fo r ga s an d 0. 6 fo r oi l « Fo r Oi l PrimaryFue l Fire d Boilers :

0. 8 l bS0 2 /MM BT

U(greate r tha n 10 0 M MBTU/hr ) an

d no percen t reductio n exclusio n fro

memissio n limit s during period s o f start up , shut-down , an

d malfunctio n n o continuou s emissio n monitoring fo r SO 2 an d NOx ; us e monthl yaverag e fue l analyse s Fo r Emerging Technologies :

correc t t o b e consisten t wit habov e Technica l corrections :

exclud e recover

yboiler s modif yth e definition s o f coal , natura l gas , distillat e oil , residua l oil , an d woo d opacit yexceptio n o f 27 % fo r one- 6 minut e perio d pe r h r exemptio n fro

mcontinuou s opacit ymonitoring fo r we t scrubber s

enf-

e 3 vxwa vHirke . Vifc-ii a 2201 5 •(703 ) 250-904 2
<PAGE>






                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pulitzer Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan G.
Silverglat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         To my knowledge, (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)
         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.






                                   /s/ Alan G. Silverglat
                                   ----------------------
                                   Alan G. Silverglat
                                   Senior Vice President - Finance
                                   (Chief Financial Officer)
                                   August 13, 2003


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pulitzer Inc. and will be retained by Pulitzer Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       2
reasons for the sentence demonstrates an abuse of discretion, we decline to 

impose such a requirement upon the district court. See Campbell v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 114 Nev. 410, 414, 957 P.2d 1141, 1143 

(1998). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

VVashoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 16, 2020

Order 

Clerk

December 16, 2020

160775(101)(102)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160775

v COA: 332081

Wayne CC: 15-005481-FH

JOEL EUSEVIO DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief submitted on 

December 9, 2020, is accepted as timely filed. On further order of the Chief Justice, the 

motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for filing its supplemental brief to January 

29, 2021, is GRANTED.
§ 2552.34 What are the rules on suspension, termination, and denial of refunding of grants? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70544 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) The Chief Executive Officer or designee is authorized to suspend further payments or to terminate payments under any grant providing assistance under the Act whenever he/she determines there is a material failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions of the grant. The Chief Executive Officer shall prescribe procedures to ensure that: ( 1 ) Assistance under the Act shall not be suspended for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions, except in emergency situations for thirty days;
( 2 ) An application for refunding under the Act may not be denied unless the recipient has been given: ( i ) Notice at least 75 days before the denial of such application of the possibility of such denial and the grounds for any such denial; and
( ii ) Opportunity to show cause why such action should not be taken;
( 3 ) In any case where an application for refunding is denied for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant, the recipient shall be afforded an opportunity for an informal hearing before an impartial hearing officer, who has been agreed to by the recipient and CNCS; and
( 4 ) Assistance under the Act shall not be terminated for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions unless the recipient has been afforded reasonable notice and opportunity for a full and fair hearing.
( b ) Hearings or other meetings as may be necessary to fulfill the requirements of this section should, to the extent practicable, be held in locations convenient to the grant recipient.
( c ) The procedures for suspension, termination, and denial of refunding, that apply to the Foster Grandparent Program are specified in 45 CFR part 1206.
[64 FR 14126, Mar. 24, 1999. Redesignated at 72 FR 48584, Aug. 24, 2007; 83 FR 64650, Dec. 17, 2018]
#### State *v.*Henry Schoolcraft.

January Term, 1900.

Present: Taft, C. J., Kowell, Tyler, Munson, Start and Thompson, JJ.

Opinion filed March 9, 1900.

*Practice in the Supreme Court*— Abandoned *and new points*— When the points made in the court below are abandoned, and points not there made are alone urged, there is nothing for the consideration of the Supreme Court.

Indictment by virtue of Y. S. 2703 and 2704. Those sections were not, however, in terms, referred to in the indictment. Heard on demurrer to the indictment, Washington County, September Term, 1899, *Watson,*J., presiding. The demurrer was overruled and the indictment adjudged sufficient. The re*224spondent excepted, but, without prejudice to his exception, pleaded guilty. Judgment rendered on plea, sentence passed, and mittimus issued.

The indictment set out, among other things, that at the September Term, 1896, of the Franklin County Court, the respondent’s lawful wife, Delia, was granted a divorce from the respondent, and that afterwards on the 8th day of February, 1899, at the City of Barre in the County of Washington, while the said Delia was alive, and while the decree of divorce so granted was in force, the respondent was married to one Ann Suitor, and that thereafter, and until May 16th, 1899, and while the said Delia was alive, the respondent and the said Ann lived and cohabited together as man and wife in the Town of Barre in said County of Washington.

*Richard A.*Soar, State’s Attorney, for the State.

*Ed/ward S. Deamtt*for the respondent.

Munson, J.

In the court below the respondent-claimed that the indictment was defective for the reason that “it did not particularly in terms refer to sections 2703 and 2701 of the Vermont Statutes,” and for the further reason that it did not set forth that the deci-ee of divorce remained in effect at the time of the cohabiting. These points are not now urged. The points which are urged were not made in the court below, and therefore cannot be considered.

*Judgment that there is no error in the proceedings and that the respondent take nothing hy his exceptions.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tire Distributors, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Berry, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,
based upon a review of the Report:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.



/s/ WILLIAM E. BERRY
------------------------------------
William E. Berry
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
American Tire Distributors, Inc.
November 12, 2002
§ 2517.200 How may grant funds be used? Funds under a community-based Learn and Serve grant may be used for the purposes described in this section. ( a ) A State Commission or grantmaking entity may use funds— ( 1 ) To make subgrants to qualified organizations described in § 2517.110 to implement, operate, expand, or replicate a community-based service program that provides direct and demonstrable educational, public safety, human, or environmental service by participants, who must be school-age youth; and
( 2 ) To provide training and technical assistance to qualified organizations.
( b ) ( 1 ) A qualified organization may use funds under a direct grant or a subgrant to implement, operate, expand, or replicate a community-based service program.
( 2 ) If a qualified organization receives a direct grant, its program must be carried out at multiple sites or be particularly innovative.
9. 

# c t t With h 

## on ac s. I 

## wom ou 

# ,

# .• as 1s proposa tsd th FAAh th' 

### een 1scusse Ib d. 

### d? Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 4/25/13 Regional Airline Association 4/25/13 Aircraft Ownc1·s & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 4/25113 ATA Joe White 4/25113
Dated:    03/29/2007                                                                              In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:By: /s/                E. Todd Whittemore                    Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  Lehman XS Trust, Series 2006-GP4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Assurant Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as ServicerGreenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as ServicerLandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and Custodian
1

PART I: FECFile Basics

• Getting started with FECFile

• Setting up your database

• Creating individual reports

PART II: Reporting Receipts

• Types of receipts reported on Schedule A

• Individual and candidate contributions

• In-kind contributions

• PAC and political committee contributions

• Refunds, rebates and interest income

PART III: Reporting Disbursements

• Types of disbursements reported on 

Schedule B

• Operating expenditures

• Staff reimbursements / credit card 

payments

• Contributions to other federal candidate 

committees

• Contribution refunds

PART IV: Reporting Loans and Debts

• Types of loans and debts

• Loans owed by committee

• Debts owed by committee

• Payments on loans and debts

• Loan forgiveness

PART V: Providing Additional Information

• Miscellaneous Electronic Submission 

(Form 99)

• Memo text on report, transactions

• Memo text v. memo item

PART VI: Filing Reports

• Close / validate / save / upload

• How to amend report

HELPFUL LINKS

• Electronic filing resources

• FECFile video tutorials

• Reporting and additional 

resources

• Contact information 

for additional help

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2024 WEBINAR SERIES 

Federal Election Commission

2024 April Quarterly Basic FECFile Webinar

for Candidate Committees

April 4, 2024 (12:00 - 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time)
§ 233.28 Monthly reporting. ( a ) State plans specifying retrospective budgeting shall require that recipients with earned income, other than income from self-employment, report that income to the agency monthly. The State may require recipients with unearned income, no income, or income from self-employment to report monthly. The agency shall provide a form for this purpose, which: ( 1 ) Is written in clear simple language;
( 2 ) Specifies the date by which the agency must receive the form and the consequences of a late or incomplete form, including whether the agency will delay or withhold payment if the form is not returned by the specified date;
( 3 ) Identifies an individual or agency unit the recipient should contact to receive prompt answers to questions about information requested on the form, and provides a telephone number for this purpose;
( 4 ) Includes a statement, to be signed by the recipient, that he or she understands that the information he or she provides may result in changes in assistance, including reduction or termination;
( 5 ) Advises the recipient if supplemental payments are available and the proper procedures for initiating a request; and
( 6 ) Advises the recipient of his or her right to a fair hearing on any decrease or termination of assistance or denial of a supplemental payment.
( b ) The agency shall specify the date by which it must receive the monthly report. This date shall be at least 5 days from the end of the budget month and shall also allow the recipient at least 5 days to complete the report.
( c ) The agency may consider a monthly report incomplete only if it is unsigned or omits information necessary to determine eligibility or compute the payment amount.
( d ) The agency shall provide a stamped, self-addressed envelope for returning the monthly report.
( e ) The agency shall make special provisions for persons who are illiterate or have other handicaps so that they cannot complete a monthly report form.
[44 FR 26083, May 4, 1979]
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WASH'NelON. 0 C 2041»3

--.

(. ,

A83-49

REPORT OF THE AUDIT DIVISION

ON THE

COMMITTEE ON LETTER CARRIERS POLITICAL EDUCATION

I. Background

A. Overview

This report is b~sed on an audit of the Committee on

Letter Carriers Political Education ("COLCPE") undertaken by the

Audit Division of the Federal Election Commission in accordance

with the Commission's audit policy to determine whether there has

been compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election

Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act-). The audit was

conducted pursuant to Section 438(b) of Title 2 of the United

States Code which states, in part, that the Commission may conduct audits and field investigations of any political committee required to file a report under section 434 of this

title. Prior to conducting any audit under this subsection, the

Commission shall perform an internal review of reports filed by

selected committees to determine if the reports filed by a

partiCUlar committee meet the threshold requirements for

substantial compliance with the Act.

The Committee registered with the Office of the Clerk

of the United States Bouse of Representatives on July 10, 1975,

and maintains its headquarters in Washington, D.C.

The audit covered the period January 1, 1981 through

December 31, 1982. The Committee reported an opening cash

balance on January 1, 1981 of $6,676.65; total receipts for the

period of $933,210.88; total disbursements for the period of

$481,962.94, and a closing cash balance on December 31, 1982 of

$457,924.59.

This audit report is based on documents and working

papers supporting each of its factual statements. They form part

of the record upon which the Commission based its decisions on

the matters in this report and were available to the

Commissioners and appropriate staff for review.
....

,.,

, .

( .....

2

B. Rey Personnel

The Treasurer of the Committee during the period of

audit was Ms. Florence M. Johnson.

c. Scope

The audit included such tests as verification of total

reported receipts, disbursements and individual transactionsJ

review of required supporting documentation; analysis of COLCPE

debts and obligations; and such other audit procedures as deemed

necessary under the circumstances.

II. Audit Finding and Recommendation

A. A matter noted during the Audit was referred to the

Commission's Office of General Counsel on December 13, 1983.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-452 

 ) 

ANTHONY SOTO-MALDONADO, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed October 7, 2015. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Steven Scott 

Stephens, Judge. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad MartinSchomaker, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellant. 

Bryant R. Camareno of Bryant R. 

Camareno, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

 Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Exposito v. State, 891 So. 2d 525, 

531 (Fla. 2004) (holding that the State does not have the right to appeal posttrial orders 

reducing a charge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.620). 
- 2 -

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Argued October 30,

decided November 14, 1911.

#### CONDON NAT. BANK *v.*ROGERS.

[118 Pac. 848.]

From Gilliam: David R. Parker, Judge.

This is an action by the Condon National Bank, against E. C. Rogers. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of *Mr. Jay Bowerman*and *Mr. Murray D. Shanks,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Bowerman.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. William H. Wilson*and *Mr. G. W. Parman,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Wilson.*

*195Mr. Justice Bean

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action upon a promissory note for the sum of $2,700, with interest. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The questions presented by this appeal are identical with those in the case of *Condon National Bank*v. *E. C. Rogers and K. C. Rogers,*60 Or. 191 (118 Pac. 846), in which an opinion by this court has just been rendered.

For the reasons therein indicated, the judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the amended answer of defendant, and for such further proceedings as may be proper, not inconsistent with that opinion.

Reversed.
#### § 150.345 Appeal of proposed penalty.

Any entity against which CMS has assessed a penalty may appeal that penalty in accordance with § 150.401 *et seq.*