alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 75 4 . KATHY RAYDEAN RODGERS v

. ACE HOMES, LLC.

On J an u ary 1 2

, 2 0 2 2

, we g ran t ed Kat h y Ro d g ers an ex t en si o n o f t i m e t o fi l e

a b ri ef o f ap p el l an t as a co u rt es y

. W e h av e d et erm i n ed

, ho wev er, t h at w e are wi t h o ut ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is m at t er. Th i s cas e b eg an as a di sp o s s es s ory p ro ceed i n g in

m ag i s t rat e co u rt ag ai n s t Ro d g ers an d al l o t h er o ccu p an t s o f a res i den ce. Fo l l o w i n g

t h e co u rt ’ s i s su an ce o f a wri t o f p o s s es si o n , Ro d gers ap p eal ed t o t h e s u p eri o r co u rt

. Aft er Ro d g ers fai l ed t o p ay t h e ren t s h e was ord ered t o p ay i n to t h e co u rt reg i s t ry , t h e

s u p eri o r co u rt en t ered a wri t o f p o s s es s io n i n fav or o f t h e p l ai n t i ff, Ace Ho m es , LLC.

Ro d g ers fi l ed t h is d i rect ap p eal fro m t h at o rd er.
An ap p eal fro m a s u p eri o r co u r t o r d e r d i s po s in g o f a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m a

m ag i s t rat e co u rt d eci s i on m u s t b e i n i t i at ed b y fi l in g an ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (a) (1 1), (b ); S t r a ch an v. Mer i t o r Mt g

. Co r p

. E a s t , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 8 2

, 8 2 (4 5 3 SE2 d 1 1 9 ) (1 9 9 5 ). “ Co m p l i an ce wi t h t he d i s cret i on ary ap p eal s

p ro ced ure i s ju ri s d i ct i o n al .” S mo a k v. Dep t. o

f Hu m a n Res o u rces , 2 2 1 Ga. Ap p

. 2 5 7,

2 5 7 (4 7 1 SE2 d 6 0) (1 9 9 6 ). Acco rd i n g l y , we l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n t o co n s i der t hi s d i rect

ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 26, 2022

01/26/2022
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser 

Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 

Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and 

Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population 

Segment’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘En5 dangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser 

6 Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 

7 Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and 

8 Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population 
2 

†SJ 9 ES 

1 Segment’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 25, 2022)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate May 3, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapPopulation Segment’’. Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Russell J. Howard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Maxygen,
Inc.



By:

/s/ Russell J. HowardName:

Russell J. HowardTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 7, 2004




I, Lawrence W.
Briscoe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ Lawrence W. BriscoeName:

Lawrence W. BriscoeTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 7, 2004
## Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-03-42

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

## Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-03-42

A-002 Initial Review Eng ineering Report for

PMN P-03-42

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P-03-42

## A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-03-42

## A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-03-42**This next revision is**

**the submitter 03/25/03.**

*********************************************************************

DRAFT

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 03-0042 ENGINEER: Hall/Blouin/JMW

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

General Eqp.:

Respirator:

Health Effects:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2

PMN: 03-0042

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials):

CRSS:

Chemical Category:

VP: <1E-06 torr @25  C

S-H 2 O: Dispersible

MW: 436 80%<500 100%<1000

Phys State:

Neat: L

Mfg:

Proc:

End Use:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns):

Ground Water: Moderate

Health: 1-2; Dermal and inhalation

Eco: 3; All releases to water,

PBT: P1B1T1

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 3

ASSUM

n.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None listedINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3

PMN: 03-0042

MFG:

Site/Location:

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleani ng, container residue, etc.):

basis:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

Tot. # of workers:

Days/yr:

Inhalation: Negligible (VP <0.001 torr )

Dermal: contact with <1,800 mg/day

Basis:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 5

PMN: 03-0042

PROC:

Site/Location:

Days/yr:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleani ng, container residue, etc.):

**from:**

**to:**

**Basis: 1)** 

2)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 5

PMN: 03-0042

PROCES

Basis:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURETot. # of workers:

Basis:

Days/yr:

Inhalation: negligible (VP <0.001 torr; )

Number of workers with inhalation exposure:

Dermal : <1,800 mg/day

Basis:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 7

PMN: 03-0042

USE:

**Site/Location:**

**Days/yr:**

**Basis: per contact**

**Process Description:**

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

**Tot. # of workers:**

**Basis:**

**Days/yr:**

Inhalation: negligible (VP <0.001 torr;

Number of workers with inhalation exposure:

Dermal with : <260 mg/day

Basis:(Telephone Log)

PMN: 03-0042

Call By: Kurt Rindfusz (Eastern Research Group for

EPA/OPPT/CEB)

Call To:

Submitter:

Date: 11/6/02

Time: 2:30pm

Q1:

A1:

Q2:

A2:

Q3:

A3:

(Telephone Log)PMN: 03-0042

Call By: John J. Blouin (EPA/CEB)

Christina Jarvis (EPA/CCD)

Call To:

Submitter:

Date: 01/27/03

Time: 1230 pm EST

The discussion centered on the processing and use of the submitters

PMN.

1.

2.

3.

4.

## A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PM N P-03-42
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph F. McGuire, the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of FNDS3000 Corp (the Company), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                              
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 3, 2008 |  | /s/ Joseph F. McGuire                        
|                        |  | Name: Joseph F. McGuire                      
|                        |  | Title: Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
#### § 2523.30 Must Federal agencies meet the requirements imposed on grantees under parts 2521 and 2522 of this chapter?

Yes, except as provided in § 2523.90. Federal agency programs must meet the same requirements and serve the same purposes as all other applicants seeking support under part 2522 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 10.25




                                 PROMISSORY NOTE




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,  ONESOURCE  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC., a Delaware
corporation,  promises to pay to the order of BARRY ZEMEL,  the principal sum of
fifty thousand dollars, ($50,000.00) with interest at the rate of twelve percent
(12%) per annum, principal and interest all due and payable on March 1, 2001.

FURTHER,  OneSource  Technologies,  Inc.  agrees  to  issue  and  delver a stock
certificate in the name of BARRY ZEMEL representing three hundred fifty thousand
( 350,000), restricted (144) common shares of OneSource Technologies, Inc.

IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT in the payment of this note,  the interest to be charged
will be at the rate of 18% per annum.

THE PROMISSORY NOTE SHALL take effect as a sealed  instrument and is enforceable
accordance with the laws of the state of Arizona. Dated this 29th day of August,
2000.


                                          ONESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                          /s/ Jerry Washburn
                                          -----------------------
                                          By: Jerry Washburn, President

                                          Attest:

                                          /s/ Ford L. Williams
                                          ------------------------
                                          By: Ford Williams
**Exhibit 8**

**Subsidiaries**

Alexandra Navigation Inc.

Appleton Navigation S.A.

Auckland Marine Inc.

Baker International S.A.

Balticsea Marine Inc.

Bayard Maritime Ltd.

Bayview Shipping Inc.

Blacksea Marine Inc.

Bounty Investment Inc.

Boxcarrier (No. 1) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 2) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 3) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 4) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 5) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 6) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 7) Corp.

Boxcarrier (No. 8) Corp.

Cellcontainer (No.1) Corp.

Cellcontainer (No.2) Corp.

Cellcontainer (No.3) Corp.

Cellcontainer (No.4) Corp.

Cellcontainer (No.5) Corp.

Channelview Marine Inc.

Cobaltium Shipping (Private) Ltd.

Cobaltium Shipping Inc.

Commodore Marine Inc.

Constantia Maritime Inc.

Containers Lines Inc.

Containers Services Inc.

Continent Marine Inc.

Deleas Shipping Limited

Duke Marine Inc.

Erato Navigation Inc.

Expresscarrier (No.1) Corp.

Expresscarrier (No.2) Corp.

Expresscarrier (No.3) Corp.

Expresscarrier (No.4) Corp.

Expresscarrier (No.5) Corp.

Federal Marine Inc.

Ferrous Shipping (Private) Ltd.

Ferrous Shipping Inc.

Geoffrey Shipholding Limited

Helderberg Maritime Inc.

Independence Navigation Inc.

Karlita Shipping Company Limited

Lacey Navigation Inc.

Lato Shipping (Private) Ltd.

Lissos Shipping (Private) Ltd.

Lito Navigation Inc.

Lydia Inc

Maria C Maritime Inc.

----

Medsea Marine Inc.

Mercator Shipping Inc.

Oceanew Shipping Limited

Oceanprize Navigation Limited

Orchid Navigation Corporation

Ortelius Maritime Inc.

Peninsula Maritime Inc.

Ramona Marine Company Limited

Roberto C Maritime Inc.

Sapfo Navigation Inc.

Saratoga Trading S.A.

Seacaravel Shipping Limited

Seacarriers Lines Inc.

Seacarriers Services Inc.

Seasenator Shipping Limited

Sederberg Maritime Inc.

Strondium Shipping Inc.

Teucarrier (No.1) Corp.

Teucarrier (No.2) Corp.

Teucarrier (No.3) Corp.

Teucarrier (No.4) Corp.

Titanium Holdings Inc.

Tully Enterprises S.A.

Tyron Enterprises S.A.

Victory Shipholding Inc.

Wellington Marine Inc.

Westwood Marine S.A.

Winterberg Maritime Inc.

----
## NO. 12

- 20

- 00110

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EQUIFY AUCTIONS, LLC

, APPELLANT

V.

JEFFREY CALLAN,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TE XAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant , Equify Auctions, L.L.C., filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. No

decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Equify ’s motion to dismiss is granted,

and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42. 1 (a).

Opinion delivered April 22, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 22 , 2020

NO. 12

- 20

- 00110

- CV

EQUIFY AUCTIONS, LLC

, Appellant

V.

JEFFREY CALLAN,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law

of Van Zandt County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV06367)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is here by ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and N eeley, J.
§ 158.161 Reporting of Federal and State licensing and regulatory fees. ( a ) *Licensing and regulatory fees included.* The report required in § 158.110 must include statutory assessments to defray operating expenses of any State or Federal department, transitional reinsurance contributions assessed under section 1341 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. 18061, and examination fees in lieu of premium taxes as specified by State law.
( b ) *Licensing and regulatory fees excluded.* The report required in § 158.110 must include fines and penalties of regulatory authorities, and fees for examinations by any State or Federal departments other than as specified in § 158.161(a) as other non-claims costs, but not as an adjustment to premium revenue.”
[75 FR 82279, Dec. 30, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 15539, Mar. 11, 2013]
§ 1149.65 Are there any limitations on the right to appeal to the authority head? ( a ) You have no right to appear personally, or through a representative, before the authority head.
( b ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling.
( c ) The authority head will not consider any objection or evidence that was not raised before the ALJ, unless you demonstrate that the failure to object was caused by extraordinary circumstances. If you demonstrate to the satisfaction of the authority head that extraordinary circumstances prevented the presentation of evidence at the hearing, and that the additional evidence is material, the authority head may remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of the additional evidence.
§ 160.312 Secretarial action regarding complaints and compliance reviews. ( a ) *Resolution when noncompliance is indicated.* ( 1 ) If an investigation of a complaint pursuant to § 160.306 or a compliance review pursuant to § 160.308 indicates noncompliance, the Secretary may attempt to reach a resolution of the matter satisfactory to the Secretary by informal means. Informal means may include demonstrated compliance or a completed corrective action plan or other agreement.
( 2 ) If the matter is resolved by informal means, the Secretary will so inform the covered entity or business associate and, if the matter arose from a complaint, the complainant, in writing.
( 3 ) If the matter is not resolved by informal means, the Secretary will— ( i ) So inform the covered entity or business associate and provide the covered entity or business associate an opportunity to submit written evidence of any mitigating factors or affirmative defenses for consideration under §§ 160.408 and 160.410 of this part. The covered entity or business associate must submit any such evidence to the Secretary within 30 days (computed in the same manner as prescribed under § 160.526 of this part) of receipt of such notification; and
( ii ) If, following action pursuant to paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, the Secretary finds that a civil money penalty should be imposed, inform the covered entity or business associate of such finding in a notice of proposed determination in accordance with § 160.420 of this part.
( b ) *Resolution when no violation is found.* If, after an investigation pursuant to § 160.306 or a compliance review pursuant to § 160.308, the Secretary determines that further action is not warranted, the Secretary will so inform the covered entity or business associate and, if the matter arose from a complaint, the complainant, in writing.
[78 FR 5690, Jan. 25, 2013]
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries

|Subsidiaries                             | Incorporated in        | Percentage Ownership
|---------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------
|Logic Express Ltd.                       | British Virgin Islands | 100.00%             
|Shandong Taibang Biologic Products., Ltd | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Xia Jin Plasma Company                   | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|He Ze Plasma Company                     | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Yang Gu Plasma Company                   | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Zhang Qiu Plasma Company                 | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Qi He Plasma Company                     | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Huan Jiang Plasma Company                | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Fang Cheng Plasma Company                | PRC                    | 66.21%              
|Shandong Missile Medical Company         | PRC                    | 82.76%              
|Pu Bei Plasma Company                    | PRC                    | 82.76%              



---
#### § 2554.9 Who is the Corporation's authority head?

The Corporation's “authority head” is the Chief Executive Officer or his or her designee. For purposes of this Part, the Corporation's Chief Financial Officer is designated to act on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION
    1.
    
    the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ John McMahon

John McMahonChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerGenesis Lease Limited
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board, and as the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, ofCompuCredit Corporation, certify that, to the best of their knowledge andbelief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of CompuCreditCorporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoingcertifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any otherpurpose.

This1st day of November, 2005.

|          |     | /s/ DAVID  G. HANNA                                   |     |
|----------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|----------|
|     |     | David G. Hanna                                        |     |
| * * | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board* | * * |
|     |     | /s/  J.PAUL WHITEHEAD, III                       |     |
|     |     | J.Paul  Whitehead, III                           |     |
| * * | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer*                            | * * |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to CompuCredit Corporation and will be retained by CompuCreditCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request

----