alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

I, John McMahon, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Lease Limited (the ‘‘Company’’), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the ‘‘Report’’), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 10, 2008

/s/ John McMahon
John McMahon
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Genesis Lease Limited

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0209 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LAWRENCE ALAN PFEIFFER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 5, 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 29 2023

12/29/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0209
#### § 153.200 [Reserved]
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-11013

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Antonio Angulo Aguilar, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:20-CR-111-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Angulo 

Aguilar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aguilar has filed a response. The record is not 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-11013 Document: 00516329812 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/23/2022
No. 21-11013

2

sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Aguilar’s claim

of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim

without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 

829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Aguilar’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-11013 Document: 00516329812 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/23/2022
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 32 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection relating to ‘‘Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit 

Opportunity Act (Regulation B)’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Ms. LUMMIS, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. 

DAINES, Mr. VANCE, Mr. THUNE, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. BARRASSO, 

Mr. WICKER, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. LEE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. 

SCOTT of Florida, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. MARSHALL, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CORNYN, Ms. 

ERNST, and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following joint resolution; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to ‘‘Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit 

Opportunity Act (Regulation B)’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Small 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 32 IS 

1 Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity 

2 Act (Regulation B)’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 35150 (May 31, 

3 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
WAFERGEN
BIO-SYSTEMS, INC.





EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), I,
Amjad Huda, certify that:





1.
            The  Annual
      Report of  WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc. (the
      “Company”)   on Form 10-K for the year
      ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
March 27, 2009





/s/ Amjad
Huda


Amjad
Huda


Chief
Financial Officer


(principal
financial officer)








A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc., and will be retained
by WaferGen
Bio-systems, Inc.,  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-12475

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00043-RS-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GAELAN PIERRE SPRUILL, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

 (January 16, 2013)

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Dustin Stephenson, appointed counsel for Gaelan Pierre Spruill in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spruill’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 53 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of 

certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles 

6 and services, described in Transmittal No. 23–15, 

7 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) 

8 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

9 2776(b)(1)), and published in the Congressional 

10 Record on December 7, 2023: seven Embedded 

2 

•SJ 53 IS 

1 Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation Sys2 tem (GPS/INS) (EGI) security devices, Airborne, 

3 with Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module 

4 (SAASM) or M–Code capability, and five (5) 

5 L3Harris BlackRock Communications Intelligence 

6 Sensor Suites. Also included are KY–100M 

7 narrowband/wideband secure communications termi8 nals; KIV–77 MODE 4/5 Identification Friend or 

9 Foe (IFF) cryptographic appliques; AN/PYQ–10 

10 Simple Key Loaders; integrated electronic intel11 ligence (ELINT)/signals intelligence (SIGINT) sys12 tems; L–3 Communication Systems-West (CSW) 

13 multiband receivers/transmitters; ARC–210 radios; 

14 high frequency (HF) radios; secure communications 

15 equipment; precision navigation and cryptographic 

16 devices; aircraft support and support equipment; test 

17 and integration support; equipment; spare and re18 pair parts; consumables and accessories; repair and 

19 return support; U.S. Government and contractor en20 gineering, technical, and logistics support services; 

21 studies and surveys; and other related elements of 

22 logistics and program support. 

Æ
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
      AMENDED**





Pursuant
      to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18
      of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James Chu, Chairman of the Board of
      Directors and Chief Executive Officer of ViewSonic Corporation (the "Company"),
      and Theodore R. Sanders, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
      certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.   The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June
      30, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
      Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d)
      of the Exchange Act; and





2.   The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company


Date:  August
        14, 2007


/s/
                James Chu
            
            /s/
                Theodore R. SandersJames
                Chu
            
            Theodore
                R. SandersChairman
                of the Board of Directors and
            
            Chief
                Financial OfficerChief
                Executive Officer






This
        certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
        by
        reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
        as
        amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
        before
        or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation
        language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8087

MTU AKILI,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

C. ZYCH, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:12-cv-00456-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mtu Akili, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mtu Akili, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 

2006 & Supp. 2012) petition and his motion for reconsideration. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Akili V. Zych, No. 7:12-cv-00456-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 

15, 2012; Nov. 27, 2012) We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1703.501 Administrative Review.

Any person who believes a Commission action governed by this part to be contrary to the provisions of this part may file an objection in writing with the Executive Director to the Commissioners. Wherever possible, the Executive Director will respond within two working days to objections concerning decisions to close meetings or portions thereof. Responses to objections concerning matters other than closed meetings will be made within ten working days.
#### § 2553.92 What legal coverage does CNCS make available to RSVP volunteers?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70545, Aug. 30, 2024.

It is within CNCS' discretion to determine if Counsel is employed and counsel fees, court costs, bail and other expenses incidental to the defense of an RSVP volunteer are paid in a criminal, civil or administrative proceeding, when such a proceeding arises directly out of performance of the volunteer's activities. The circumstances under which CNCS may pay such expenses are specified in 45 CFR part 1220.

[83 FR 64657, Dec. 17, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph F. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer of FNDS3000 Corp, (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended August 31, 2010 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Joseph F. McGuireName:

Joseph F. McGuireTitle:

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)Date:

November 29, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 230 (Thursday, November 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 69220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


United States Postal Service Board of Governors; Sunshine Act 
Meeting

Date and Time: Tuesday, December 5, 2006, at 2 p.m.; and Wednesday, 
December 6, 2006, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

Status: December 5-2 p.m.--Closed; December 6-8:30 a.m.--Open; December 
6-10 a.m.-- Closed

Matters to be Considered: Tuesday, December 5 at 2 p.m. (Closed)
    1. Strategic Planning.
    2. Rate Case Update.
    3. Labor Negotiations Update.
    4. Financial Update.
    5. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    6. Negotiated Service Agreement.

Wednesday, December 6 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, November 14-15, 2006.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO Jack Potter.
    3. Committee Reports.
    4. Consideration of Postal Service Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report.
    5. Consideration of Final Fiscal Year 2008 Appropriation Request.
    6. Capital Investment.
    a. Flats Sequencing System--Phase I Program.
    7. Tentative Agenda for the January 9-10, 2007, meeting in 
Washington, DC.

Wednesday, December 6 at 10 a.m. (Closed)--if needed

    1. Continuation of Tuesday;s closed session agenda.

Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9475 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
Federal Contributions Contributions Contributions/Loans Other Loans Transfers

Matching From Individuals from Cmte's from the Candidate Minus from Previous Other

Funds Minus Refunds Minus Refunds Minus Repayments Repayments Campaigns Receipts Total

Republicans

McCain, John S* $0 $190,411,677 $1,301,134 $0 $0 $22,825,545 $5,052,695 $219,591,051

Democrats

Obama, Barack** $0 $659,128,072 $1,580 $0 $0 $86,950,000 $1,675,373 $747,755,026

Total General Election Candidates (2) $0 $849,539,749 $1,302,714 $0 $0 $109,775,545 $6,728,069 $967,346,077

Total Primary Candidates (18) $20,644,976 $475,755,038 $3,645,929 $60,230,846 $18,165 $19,442,815 $3,703,578 $583,441,347

(Excludes General Election Candidates)

Grand Total $20,644,976 $1,325,294,787 $4,948,644 $60,230,846 $18,165 $129,218,361 $10,431,646 $1,550,787,424

* First Financial Report for 2008 cycle - 2006 YE

** First Financial Report for 2008 cycle - 2007 Q1

Presidential Receipts through December 31, 2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20646 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL ANGEL MUNDO-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-651-1

-------------------- February 20, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Miguel Angel Mundo-Jimenez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mundo-Jimenez appeals the district court’s interpretation of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) at his sentencing. For the first time on appeal, Mundo-Jimenez argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior conviction for an aggravated felony as a mere sentencing factor and not an element of the offense. He contends that theNo. 02-20646 -2- unconstitutionality of the statute is not remedied by treating the prior aggravated felony as an element of the offense and including it in the indictment. Mundo-Jimenez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; see also United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This argument lacks merit. Mundo-Jimenez also argues that his prior felony convictionfor possession of a controlled substance did not merit the eightlevel adjustment provided in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) for an aggravated felony. He argues that he should have received only the four-level adjustment provided in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(D) for “any other felony.” Mundo-Jimenez’s arguments regarding the definitions of “drug trafficking offense” and “aggravated felony” are foreclosed by United States v. Caicedo-Cuero , 312 F.3d 697, 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002). The district court did not err in assessing an eight-level adjustment, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), to Mundo-Jimenez’s sentencing guideline calculation.
AFFIRMED.