alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND BANKRUPTCY COURTS 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 Joshua Freedman 

 49 Sample Bridge RD 

 Mechanicsburg, PA17050 

 Cumberland County 

 9168060052 

 freedman.joshua+FEC@gmail.com 

 VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:22-cv-01542-RCL 

 Federal Elections Commission 

 Alan Dickerson, Chair 

 1050 First Street, NE 

 Washington, DC 20463 

 District of Columbia 

 202-694-1100 

 info@fec.gov cgallagher@fec.gov 

 Complaint Ammendment 

 Plaintiff Joshua Freedman hereby amends the complaint previously filed in the above-captioned matter to 

 include the following claims: 

 1. The current enforcement of Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules on federal elections is 

 unconstitutional as corporations are not citizens and do not have the same freedom of speech 

 protections as individuals. 

 2. The Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 

 (2010), which held that corporations have the same First Amendment rights as individuals and 

 can therefore spend unlimited amounts of money to influence political campaigns, is 

 unconstitutional. 

 3. The current enforcement of FEC rules and the Citizens United ruling have resulted in a corrupt 

 and undemocratic political system, where the interests of wealthy corporations are prioritized 

 over the interests of the American people. 

 4. The FEC has failed to regulate and enforce federal election laws in a fair and impartial manner, 

 allowing corporations and wealthy individuals to exert undue influence over the political process. 

 5. The continued enforcement of FEC rules and the Citizens United ruling will result in a continued 

 erosion of democracy and the concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals 

 and corporations. 

4/6/2023

Case 1:22-cv-01542-RCL Document 17 Filed 04/06/23 Page 1 of 2

RECEIVED

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Court for the District of Columbia 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Joshua Freedman requests that the Court declare the current enforcement of FEC

rules and the Citizens United ruling unconstitutional and order the FEC to regulate and enforce federal

election laws in a fair and impartial manner.

Thank you.

Joshua Freedman

49 Sample Bridge RD

Mechanicsburg, PA17050

Cumberland County

9168060052

freedman.joshua+FEC@gmail.com

4/6/2023

Case 1:22-cv-01542-RCL Document 17 Filed 04/06/23 Page 2 of 2
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT

                   
This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Change of
Control Agreement is made as of the 31st day of October, 2000, by and between
Stewart Enterprises, Inc., a Louisiana corporation (the "Company"),
and Randall L. Stricklin (the "Employee").


W I T N E S S E T H:


                   
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment Agreement with the Employee
dated as of April 20, 2000 (the "Employment Agreement");

                   
WHEREAS, the Company has entered into a Change of Control Agreement with the
Employee dated as of April 20, 2000 (the "Change of Control
Agreement"); and

                   
WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to an extension of the terms
of the Employment Agreement and the Change of Control Agreement, as set forth
herein.

                   
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Employee
by the Company and the payment of wages, salary and other compensation to
Employee by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective
October 31, 2000:

                   
Section 1.     Except as expressly amended herein, all
of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement and Change of Control
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                   
Section 2.     Article I, Section 2 of the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


  
               
    Employment Term.     The term of this Agreement (the
    "Employment Term") shall commence on the Agreement Date and shall
    continue through October 31, 2001, subject to any earlier termination
    of Employee's status as an employee pursuant to this Agreement.

  



                   
Section 3.     Article II, Section 2.1(a) of the Change
of Control Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


  
               
    2.1     Employment Term and Capacity after
    Change of Control. (a) If a Change of Control occurs on or before
    October 31, 2001, then the Employee's employment term (the
    "Employment Term") shall continue through the second anniversary
    of the Change of Control, subject to any earlier termination of Employee's
    status as an employee pursuant to this Agreement.

  



                   
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

	 	STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
      By:  /s/ James W. McFarland                  

                 James W. McFarland

                 Compensation Committee Chairman

	 	 
      EMPLOYEE:

        /s/   Randall L. Stricklin                          

                        
      Randall L. Stricklin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENTS, BALANCE SHEETS AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001068874
<NAME> IMPLANT SCIENCES
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,344,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,083,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,720
<INVENTORY>                                     52,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,588,556
<PP&E>                                       2,999,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                 906,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,981,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,475,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          520,732
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,426,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,981,472
<SALES>                                      2,200,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,200,391
<CGS>                                        3,200,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,200,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (910,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (910,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (910,320)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
4828 Loop Central Drive
Houston TX 77081
Telephone  713-966-8966
Fax  713-218-4595
www.littonloan.com
Inv 684- Servicer Compliance Statement


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
C-BASS 2006-CB6 Trust
The undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during such preceding calendar year (or such shorter period in the case of the first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects for 2006, except as disclosed below:
Reconciliations for Asset-Backed Securities Related Bank Account  1122(d)(2)(vii)(D)
Our investor bank account reconciliations included certain reconciling items that were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification on eleven of sixty-threeinvestor bank account reconciliations selected for testing.  The sum of the reconciling items for those eleven reconciliations was $216,950.
Adjustments to Interest Rates for Pool Assets With Variable Rates  1122(d)(4)(ix)
Our testing of sixty-five adjustable rate mortgages revealed two instances where certainadjustable rate mortgages  for which the interest rate reset in the servicing system did not agree to interest rates in the appropriate source index per the borrower's note documents.These were the result of incorrect information transferring from the prior servicer.Additionally, the same sixty-five mortgages selected for testing included one instance where the adjustable rate mortgage payment change date in the servicing system did not agree to the loan documents.
Date: February 27, 2007
/s/ Elizabeth Folk__________________________________Elizabeth FolkSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35 a)
SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION { CONVENED JANUARY 7, 2003

SECOND SESSION {

EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

Tuesday, February 25, 2003

PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

By Michelle Haynes, Executive Clerk

Issue No. 18
UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENT

Ordered, That at 9:30 a.m., on Tuesday, February 25, 2003, the Senate proceed to executive session to resume

consideration of the nomination of Miguel A. Estrada, of Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District

of Columbia Circuit. (Cal. No. 21)

(February 24, 2003)
CALENDAR

NO.

EX.RES

NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

RESOLUTIONS

1
1 107-8 The Moscow Treaty Feb 20, 2003 Reported favorably by

Mr. Lugar, Committee on

Foreign Relations with printed

Ex. Rept.108-1 and a resolution

of advice and consent to

ratification with two conditions

and six declarations.

CALENDAR

NO.

TREATY

DOC. NO. SUBJECT

REPORTED

BY

TREATIES

2
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 17 81 Stanley C. Suboleski, of Virginia, to be a Member

of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term of six years expiring

August 30, 2006, vice Marc Lincoln Marks,

term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

REVIEW COMMISSION

* 18 82 W. Scott Railton, of Virginia, to be a Member of

the Occupational Safety and Health Review

Commission for a term expiring April 27, 2007,

vice Gary L. Visscher, term expired.

Jan 23, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Gregg, Committee on Health,

Education, Labor, and Pensions,

without printed report.

THE JUDICIARY

21 6 Miguel A. Estrada, of Virginia, to be United

States Circuit Judge for the District of

Columbia Circuit, vice Patricia M. Wald,

retired.

Jan 30, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Hatch, Committee on the

Judiciary, without printed report.

32 15 Jeffrey S. Sutton, of Ohio, to be United States

Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, vice David

A. Nelson, retired.

Feb 13, 2003 Reported by Mr.

Hatch, Committee on the

Judiciary, without printed report.

* Signifies nominee’s commitment to respond to requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of the Senate

NOMINATIONS

CALENDAR

NO.

MESSAGE

NO. NOMINEE, OFFICE, AND PREDECESSOR

REPORTED

BY

3
NOMINATIONS PLACED ON THE SECRETARY’S DESK

4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2021

No. 04-21-00181-CV

Robert CORLEY,

Appellant

v.

Timothy CORLEY, Jason Corley and Century Oaks Land LLC,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI02547

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Petitioner’s motion for leave to file final corrected petition for permissive appeal is 

GRANTED to substitute the original petition. However, the deadlines run from the date the 

original petition for permissive appeal was filed. A response to the petition for permissive 

appeal may be filed on or before May 20, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(f). 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g ar i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2009- CV F- 001058 D 2, s t y l ed M a n u el R i o s H erre ra v. C o m p a ss

Bank, A s Succ es s or i n I nt er es t t o The Lar edo Nat i onal Bank , fil e d in t h e 1 1 1 th J u d ic ia l D istric t C o u rt, W e b b C o u n ty, T e x a s. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No . 0 4- 10 -0 01 82 -C V IN RE MANU EL RIOS HERRERA Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and f

iled: April 21, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Marc h 1, 2010, rela tor filed a pe tition for writ of mandam u s , compl aining of the trial court’s or der da ted J anuar y 25, 2010. This court’s re view of the transc ript of the January 20, 2010 hear ing a nd the trial cour

t’s docket e ntry

dated January

20, 2010 indicates the pa rties re ache d an

a g re e me nt tha t led to the Janu a ry 25 , 201 0 ord e r. Ac c or din g ly , this c ou rt ha s det e rm ine d re la tor is not entitled to the relief soug ht. There fore , the petition is DENI ED. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). R el at o r s h al l p ay

al l co s t s i n cu rr ed i n t h i s p ro ce ed i n g.

PER C URI AM
**Exhibit        21.1**

**Subsidiaries        of the Small Business Issuer**

|                                                |   | State                  or Other Jurisdiction of                                 |   | Other                  Names under Which      |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Name                  of Subsidiary Company         |   |  Incorporation                  or Organization                            |   | the                  Subsidiary Does Business |
|                                                |   |                                                                            |   |                                          |
| Tekoil                  & Gas Corporation       |   | Florida                                                                         |   | None                                          |
|                                                |   |                                                                            |   |                                          |
| Tekoil                  and Gas Gulf Coast, LLC     |   | Delaware                                                                        |   | None                                          |
|                                                |   |                                                                            |   |                                          |
| Tekoil                  Rig Development Corporation |   | Province                  of Newfoundland and                  Labrador, Canada |   | None                                          |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JEFFREY TAYLOR,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 49 WM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd day of December , 2021, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED.
§ 2500.2 Agency operating name. ( a ) The Corporation for National and Community Service has adopted AmeriCorps as its official agency operating name.
( b ) Use of AmeriCorps as the agency operating name incorporates the Corporation for National and Community Service by reference.
#### Elmira E. Van Inwegen, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin H. Van Inwegen, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Van Inwegen*v. *Erie B. B. Go.,*126 App. Div. 297, affirmed.

(Argued December 16, 1908;

decided January 12, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 18, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff *535entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have ocurred through defendant’s negligence.

*Henry Bacon*for appellant.

*Lewis E. Carr*and *Abram F. Servin*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Vann, J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6433

RODNEY LAMONT WEBSTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-01235-LMB)

Submitted: July 18, 2007 Decided: August 3, 2007

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Lamont Webster, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Lamont Webster seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as

untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Webster has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Order entered November 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00531-CV

JUAN CARLOS FLORES, Appellant

V.

CHASCO, INC. A/K/A CHASCO INTERIORS, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-14912-H

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 22, 2014 motion for second extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 18, 2014. No further 

extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
§ 2524.10 For what purposes will technical assistance and training funds be made available? ( a ) To the extent appropriate and necessary, the Corporation may make technical assistance available to States, Indian tribes, labor organizations, religious organizations, organizations operated by young adults, organizations serving economically disadvantaged individuals, and other entities eligible to apply for assistance under parts 2521 and 2522 of this chapter that desire— ( 1 ) To develop AmeriCorps programs; or
( 2 ) To apply for assistance under parts 2521 and 2522 of this chapter or under a grant program conducted using such assistance.
( b ) In addition, the Corporation may provide program development assistance and conduct, directly or by grant or contract, appropriate training programs regarding AmeriCorps in order to— ( 1 ) Improve the ability of AmeriCorps programs assisted under parts 2521 and 2522 of this chapter to meet educational, public safety, human, or environmental needs in communities— ( i ) Where services are needed most; and
( ii ) Where programs do not exist, or are too limited to meet community needs, as of the date on which the Corporation makes the grant or enters into the contract;
( 2 ) Promote leadership development in such programs;
( 3 ) Improve the instructional and programmatic quality of such programs to build an ethic of civic responsibility;
( 4 ) Develop the management and budgetary skills of program operators;
( 5 ) Provide for or improve the training provided to the participants in such programs;
( 6 ) Encourage AmeriCorps programs to adhere to risk management procedures, including the training of participants in appropriate risk management practices; and
( 7 ) Assist in such other manner as the Corporation may specify.
[59 FR 13805, Mar. 23, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 45360, July 9, 2002]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is postponing the meeting of the Neurological Devices Panel scheduled for October 31, 2006. The meeting was announced in the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 22, 2006 (71 FR 55491). FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health will further evaluate data relevant to the topic. A future meeting date will be announced in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

*Contact Person*:  Janet L. Scudiero, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-410), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-1184, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 3014512513.  Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.                

Dated: October 13, 2006.

Randall W. Lutter,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. 06-8788 Filed 10-19-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### §§ 292.1-292.10 [Reserved]