alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 34.2
               Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
                 Firm in Respect of Servicing for the year ended
                                December 31, 2006

                         (The Huntington National Bank)


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
The Huntington National Bank

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that The Huntington National Bank (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Automobile Loan and Lease Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122 (d)(1)(ii), (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(i.C), (d)(3)(1.D), (d)(4)(ix),
(d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), and (d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion defines the loans
and leases sold to the identified trusts as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform.
Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the Automobile Loan and Lease Platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
Columbus, Ohio

March 15, 2007
BRYAN M. WOFFORD

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILE D

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5326

Opinion filed August 6, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Bryan M. Wofford, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied. See Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(c)(4)(F)(i).

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ.

, CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.3(J)


                                    The CIT Group/ Credit Finance 1211 Avenue of
                                    the Americas New York, NY 10036 Tel 212
                                    790-9100 Fax 212 790-9123


         THE
         CIT
         GROUP
                                                             April 11, 2000

PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION, INC.
460 Plainfield Avenue
Edison, NJ  08817

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the (i) Loan and Security Agreement between you and us, as
successor by merger to The CIT Group/Credit Finance, Inc., dated August 4, 1989,
as supplemented and amended (the "Loan Agreement") and (ii) the letter agreement
between us dated April 26, 1999 with respect to a certain Overadvance (the
"Overadvance Letter"). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the same meanings given them in the Loan Agreement and/or the
Overadvance Letter.

Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Overadvance Letter it is
hereby mutually agreed that, the current outstanding balance of the Overadvance
which is $2,300,000.00 and is due and payable to us without offset, counterclaim
or deduction, shall be repaid in monthly installments of $100,000.00 on the
first business day of each month commencing on May 1, 2000.

The effectiveness of this agreement shall be subject to our receipt of an
amendment (in form and substance satisfactory to us) increasing the Guaranty
executed by ICC Industries, Inc. from $1,500,000.00 to $2,000,000.00.

In consideration of the foregoing, Borrower agrees to pay to Lender a
transaction fee in the amount of $12,500 payable and fully earned upon the
execution of this amendment and which transaction fee shall be in addition to
all other fees set forth in the Loan Agreement.

Except as herein specifically provided, the Loan Agreement and/or the
Overadvance Letter shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with
their terms and no other changes in or waivers of the terms or provisions of the
Loan Agreement and/or the Overadvance Letter are intended or implied. Nothing
contained herein shall or shall be deemed to waive, release or modify any right
or remedy to either party under the Loan Agreement or applicable law. If you are
in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing and returning to
us the enclosed copy of this letter.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.
                                        As successor by merger to
                                        The CIT Group/Credit Finance, Inc.



                                        By:  /S/ Andrew S. Housspiegel
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Title:  Vice President

Read and Agreed to:

PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS, INC.



By:  /S/ JOHN ORAM
   -----------------------------------------------
Title:  Chairman
----

Exhi

**Certification        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant        to**

**Section 906        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and operating results of the                  Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  David C. Choi       |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| David                  C. Choi           |   |
| Chief                  Financial Officer |   |

----
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 71 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, 

and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: 

Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11 (legislative day, APRIL 10), 2024 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. LEE, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. 

SULLIVAN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. MULLIN, and Mr. RICKETTS) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing 

Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Ad4 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relatVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:15 Apr 11, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ71.IS SJ71

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 71 IS 

1 ing to ‘‘Standards of Performance for New, Recon2 structed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines 

3 for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate 

4 Review’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 16820 (March 8, 2024)), and such 

5 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Place Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, David W. Gifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 10, 2008 |  | /s/ David W. Gifford   
|                        |  | David W. Gifford       
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Lyle Edward Roach, appellee, v. Joseph Wolff et al., appellants.

Filed April 17, 1914.

No. 18,350.

Appeal from the district .court for Brown county: William H. Westover, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J..A. Douglas*and *Albert 8. Ritchie,*for appellants.

*R. M. Johnson, John M. Cotton*and *M. F. Harrington, contra.*

Fawcett, J.

The only brief on file in this case is one by the appellants, in which it is stated: “This case, being No. 18350, was advanced and ordered to be heard together with No. 17606. The cause of action on which the recovery is based is the same in both actions, and the only difference between them is as to the damages, and on this question of damages no citation of authority is necessary. We claim them to be excessive in both cases.” In case No. 17606, *Roach v. Wolff, ante,*p. 43, the action was brought by the widow of the decedent for herself and her minor daughter. After that case was tried and judgment entered, a son was born, and this action was instituted to recover damages on his behalf. As no reason is assigned in the brief why this action cannot be maintained, and the difference, if any, on the question of damages between this action and No. *5117606, *Roach v. Wolff, ante,*p. 43, not having been pointed out, and it being conceded that the cause of action upon which the recovery is based is the same in both actions, and the evidence substantially the same in both, we do not deem it necessary to make an independent examination of the record in this case. On the authority, therefore, of our judgment in No. 17606, *Roach v. Wolff, ante,*p. 43, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the district court in this action is

Affirmed.

Barnes, Rose and Sedgwick, JJ., not sitting.
#### Catherine L. Boyer, Plaintiff, *v.*Frank W. Boyer, Appellant. John A. Thompson, as Receiver, Respondent.

*Boyer*v. *Boyer,*133 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

(Argued November 8, 1909;

decided November 23, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department entered June 18,1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to compel the respondent as receiver of the property of the defendant in sequestration proceedings to pay over to defendant certain moneys coming into the hands of such receiver pending an appeal from the order of appointment.

*Arnold L. Davis*for appellant.

*John A. Thompson*and *Seymour K. Fidler*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Hiscook, J.
IIA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 98 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture 

relating to ‘‘Use of Electronic Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Agriculture relating to ‘‘Use of Electronic Identification Eartags as Official Identification in 

Cattle and Bison’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Agriculture relating to ‘‘Use of Electronic 

5 Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 98 IS 

1 and Bison’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 39540 (May 9, 2024)), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Tire 

Everythin

Protection against a

crashes. Improved v

fuel economy. Incre

the reasons to take 

to check your tires. 

checklist below, and 

more information o

✔ 

✔ 

✔ 

✔ 

✔ 

✔ 

• 

• 

Safe

Check tire pressu

month), including 

Inspect tires for u

tread, cracks, fore

wear or trauma. 

foreign objects w

Make sure your t

Check tire pressu

Do not overload y

information placa

maximum recomm

If you are towing 

the weight of the 

the towing vehic

Sa

Slow down if you 

other object in th

Do not run over 

curb when parki

Remembe

tires on
There s Sa

You can find the numbe

and vehicle load limit on 

and in the vehicle owne

permanent labels attach

doorpost, glove-box doo

Once you’ve located this 

your tire pressure and to 

overloaded—especially w

Checkin

Because tires may natur

important to check you

month. For convenience

to keep in your vehicle. 

dealerships, auto supply 

Remember, the tire infla

facturers provide reflect

inch (psi) when a tire is 

pressure reading, measu

has been unused for at 

Step 1:	 Locate the corr

information pla

Step 2: Record the tire 

Step 3:	 If the tire press

slowly release 

valve with the 

to the correct p

Step 4:	 If the tire press

between the m

tire pressure. Th

are what you w

Step 5:	 At a service sta

pressure to eac

Step 6:	 Check all the ti

air pressure (ex

rear tires are su

pressure). 

Checki

Tires have built-in tread

know when it is time to 

cators are raised section

bottom of the tread gro

with the outside of the 

tires. You can also test y

Simply turn the penny s

down and insert it into 

cover Lincoln’s head, it’s 

For a free broch

or call 1-888-3
# STATEOF LOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT DONALD RUNNELS VERSUS LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS In Re: Donald Runnels, applying

Judicial District Court, No. 716928. NO. 2022 CW 1386 

### MARCH 13, 2023
for supervisory writs, 19th Parish of East Baton Rouge,
BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ .:

WRIT DENIED. The district court has issued judgment on relator's writ of habeas corpus.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT MRT WRC CHH
Exhibit 4.54
 VEDANTA ALUMINIUM LIMITED
    TERM SHEET FOR THE NCD ISSUE OF 1500 CRORES TO SIIL
 1
    
    Instruments
    
    Taxable Redeemable, Secured Non-convertible Debentures2
    
    Aggregate Issue Amount
    
    Rs.1500 crores3
    
    Object Of the Issue
    
    Meeting the Companys Project Commitments4
    
    Tenor
    
    1 year from deemed date of allotment5
    
    Mode of Placement
    
    Private Placement6
    
    Date of Allotment
    
    5250 NCD allotted on 16/03/20091600 NCD allotted on 27/03/20092250 NCD allotted on 27/04/20095900 NCD allotted on 22/05/20097
    
    Denomination
    
    Rs.10,00,0008
    
    Issue price
    
    Rs.10,00,0009
    
    Maturity price
    
    Rs.10,00,00010
    
    Interest Rate
    
    9.75% payable semi annually11
    
    Security
    
    First Pari Passu charge on land at Gujarat of the Company12
    
    Debenture Holder
    
    Sterlite Industries (India) Limited13
    
    Debenture Trustees
    
    IL & FS Trust Company Ltd14
    
    Existing chargeholders
    
    1. Sterlite Industries (India) Limited2. LIC15
    
    Status
    
    The security shall be first pari passu with all the existing charge holders.16
    
    Default Interest
    
    2% pa17
    
    Security Cover
    
    No security cover is stipulated.  However SIIL/Debenture Holder will issue a letter of security sufficiency.
 For VEDANTA ALUMINIUM LTD.
    
    For STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LTD./s/ Manish Bhatter
    
    /s/ A. Satish(Authorized Signatory)
    
    (Authorized Signatory)
```

[109th Congress Public Law 264]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ264.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 667]]

Public Law 109-264
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 4 of the United States Code to clarify the treatment of 
  self-employment for purposes of the limitation on State taxation of 
        retirement income. <<NOTE: Aug. 3, 2006 -  [H.R. 4019]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF SELF-EMPLOYMENT FOR PURPOSES OF 
            THE LIMITATION ON STATE TAXATION OF RETIREMENT INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 114(b)(1)(I) of title 4, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(or any plan, program, or arrangement 
        that is in writing, that provides for retirement payments in 
        recognition of prior service to be made to a retired partner, 
        and that is in effect immediately before retirement begins)'' 
        after ``section 3121(v)(2)(C) of such Code'',
            (2) by inserting ``which may include income described in 
        subparagraphs (A) through (H)'' after ``(not less frequently 
        than annually'',
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                ``The fact that payments may be adjusted from time to 
                time pursuant to such plan, program, or arrangement to 
                limit total disbursements under a predetermined formula, 
                or to provide cost of living or similar adjustments, 
                will not cause the periodic payments provided under such 
                plan, program, or arrangement to fail the `substantially 
                equal periodic payments' test.'', and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) For purposes of this section, the term `retired 
        partner' is an individual who is described as a partner in 
        section 7701(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and who 
        is retired under such individual's partnership agreement.''.

    (b) Application.--The <<NOTE: 4 USC 114 note.>> amendments made by 
this section apply to amounts received after December 31, 1995.

    Approved August 3, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4019:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-542 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
            July 17, considered and passed House.
            July 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
RECEIVED 

FEC MAIL CENTER 

2610 JUL 30 PH U'- 28 Pcrk

Coie 

607 Fourteenth Street N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005-2003 

Brian G. Svoboda 

.^^M wotiit 202.628.6600 PHONE: (202)434-1654 

PAX: (202)434-1690 Rot 202.434.1690 

EMAIL: BSvobod8@perkinscoie.com www.perklnscole.com 

July 30,2010 

Joseph F.Stoltz 

Assistant Staff Director 

Audit Division 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Re: Harry Teague for Congress - Response to Interim Audit Report 

Dear Mr. Stoltz: 

The purpose of this letter is to respond to the Interim Audit Report ("fhe Report") on Harry 

Teague for Congress ("fhe Conimittee"). With fhe exception of a technical correction, fhe 

Committee does not object to the Report, but we sqipreciate fhe opportunity to provide additional 

context. 

The Committee is the principal campaign committee for Harry Teague, who represents fhe 2nd 

District ofthe State of New Mexico in Congress. Congressman Teague was a first time 

candidate during fhe 2008 election cycle. The Committee did not have anyone with prior 

experience in submitting reports to the Commission. The Report's sole finding was a result of 

this fact. The Committee has since taken steps to revise and address its compliance procedures. 

The Committee's one substantive comment is with regard to the Report's discussion of the loan 

repayment. The Report's description of fhe issue as involving an "Unreported loan repayment to 

Candidate" should be revised for accuracy. As fhe Report acknowledges, fhe loan repayment 

was fully disclosed, but as a memo entry. While fhe method of disclosure resulted m an 

incorrect cash-on-hand figure, fhe loan repayment was still fully disclosed to both fhe 

Commission and fhe public. The final report should make clear that while the repayment ougjht 

to have been reported differently, it was still disclosed. 

LEGAL188S0560.1 

ANCHORAGE • BEIJINC • BELLEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO • DENVER • LOS ANGELES • MADISON 

MENLO PARK • PHOENIX • PORTLAND • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Perlcins Cole O P and Affiliates 
Harry Teague for Congress 

Response to Interim Audit Report 

Page 2 

We appreciate fhe opportunity to present this information. Please do not hesitate to contact us if 

you have further questions. 

Very truly yours. 

Brian G. Svoboda 

Ezra W. Reese 

Counsel to Harry Teague for Congress 

LEGAL188S0560.1