alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.41

                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

                        TO CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF

                           DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                 (Pursuant to the provisions of Section 78.0295
             of the General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada)

    It is hereby certified that:

    1. The name of the corporation (the "Corporation") is Display  Technologies,
Inc.

    2. The  Corporation  filed a  Certificate  of  Designation  with the  Nevada
Secretary of State on January 10, 2001 (the "Certificate"), creating a series of
Preferred  Stock  of  the  Corporation  designated  as  Series  A-1  Convertible
Preferred Stock consisting of 50,000 shares ("Series A-1 Preferred Stock").

    3. The first  sentence of Section II.1 of Exhibit A to the  Certificate,  as
filed,  provided  that a dividend  of  $196,875  per share was to be paid on the
outstanding  shares of Series A-1  Preferred  Stock on July 1, 2001.  The stated
dollar amount was a drafting error. The correct amount of the dividend per share
of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock is $3.9375.

    4. Said incorrect  statement is hereby  corrected by substituting the amount
of "$3.9375" for the amount of "$196,875" in the first  sentence of Section II.1
of Exhibit A to the Certificate.

    Executed on January 17, 2001.

                                     By:  /s/ Todod D. Thrasher
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           Todd D. Thrasher, Vice President


                                     By:  /s/ Marshall S. Harris
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           Marshall S. Harris, Secretary
STATE OF FLORIDA   )
                   )  SS.:
COUNTY OF ORANGE   )

    On January 17, 2001, personally appeared before me, a Notary Public, for the
State and County  aforesaid,  Todd D.  Thrasher,  as Vice  President  of Display
Technologies, Inc., who acknowledged that he executed the above instrument.

                                                   [signed]
                                     -------------------------------------------
[Notarial Seal                             Notary Public
§ 2508.8 Who is responsible for establishing the Corporation's rules of conduct for Privacy Act compliance? ( a ) The Chief Executive Officer shall ensure that all persons involved in the design, development, operation or maintenance of any system of records as defined herein are informed of all requirements necessary to protect the privacy of individuals who are the subject of such records. All employees shall be informed of all implications of the Act in this area including the civil remedies provided under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1) and the fact that the Corporation may be subject to civil remedies for failure to comply with the provisions of the Privacy Act and this regulation.
( b ) The Chief Executive Officer shall also ensure that all personnel having access to records receive adequate training in the protection of the security of personal records, and that adequate and proper storage is provided for all such records with sufficient security to assure the privacy of such records.
#### § 1801.50 Acceptance of the scholarship.

To receive any payment, a Scholar must sign an acceptance of the scholarship and acknowledgement of the conditions of the award and submit it to the Foundation.
#### § 152.44 End of PCIP program coverage.

Effective January 1, 2014, coverage under the PCIP program (45 CFR part 152) will end.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of R&R Acquisition X, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
September 23, 2010





/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
                .Kirk
      M. WarshawChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
§ 2400.43 Required courses of graduate study. ( a ) To be acceptable to the Foundation, those courses related to the Constitution referred to in § 2400.43(b) must amount to at least 12 semester or 18 quarter hours or their credit hour equivalent of study of topics directly related to the United States Constitution. More than 12 semester hours or their credit hour equivalent of such study is strongly encouraged.
( b ) The courses that fulfill the required minimum of 12 semester hours or their credit hour equivalent of study of the United States Constitution must cover one or more of the following subject areas: ( 1 ) The history of colonial America leading up to the framing of the Constitution;
( 2 ) The Constitution itself, its framing, the history and principles upon which it is based, its ratification, the *Federalist Papers,* Anti-Federalist writings, and the Bill of Rights;
( 3 ) The historical development of political theory, constitutional law, and civil liberties as related to the Constitution;
( 4 ) Interpretations of the Constitution by the Supreme Court and other branches of the federal government;
( 5 ) Debates about the Constitution in other forums and about the effects of constitutional norms and decisions upon American society and culture; and
( 6 ) Any other subject clearly related to the framing, history, and principles of the Constitution.
( c ) If a master's degree program in which a Fellow is enrolled requires a master's thesis in place of a course or courses, the Fellow will have the option of writing the thesis based on the degree requirements. The preparation of a master's thesis should not add additional required credits to the minimum number of credits required for the master's degree. If a Fellow must write a thesis, the topic of the thesis must relate to subjects concerning the framing, principles, or history of the United States Constitution. If the Fellow can choose between two degree tracks, a thesis track or a non-thesis track, the Foundation in general, requires the non-thesis track.
[61 FR 46734, Sept. 5, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 11814, Mar. 12, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,578,071
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,990,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,448,636
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      21,448,636
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        21,448,636
<LOANS>                                     74,440,161
<ALLOWANCE>                                    935,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,528,272
<DEPOSITS>                                  86,906,529
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,150,540
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,870,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,101,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             107,528,272
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,266,861
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,286,839
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               243,472
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,797,172
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,024,930
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,289,073
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,508,099
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  336,243
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              46,499
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,985,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,765,191
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,259,896
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,259,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.00
<LOANS-NON>                                    555,429
<LOANS-PAST>                                   176,997
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,052,469
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               829,232
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  268,151
<RECOVERIES>                                    37,910
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              935,234
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           935,234
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        199,946
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to Edgecombe Road. In the Matter of the Lien of James A. Deering, Respondent, upon an Award Made to Lillie J. Earle, Appellant.

*Matter of City of New York (Edgecombe Road),*128 App. Div. 432, affirmed.

(Argued January 5, 1909;

decided January 19, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 13, 1908, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term determining the amount of an attorney’s lien.

*W. B. Symmes, Jr.,*for appellant.

*John C. Shaw*and *James A. Deering*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 33.6B

                      Letter from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.


                                                     August 3, 2007

Goldman Sachs Asset Backed Securities Corp.
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association ("JPMorgan") is in receipt of
a copy of the June 25, 2007 letter (the "Letter") from Max A. Webb of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to Goldman Sachs Asset Backed
Securities Corp. ("Goldman"). The Letter notes that on the Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for GS Auto Loan Trust 2006-1 (the
"Transaction"), Goldman reported material noncompliance with Items 1122(d)(3)(i)
and (ii) and requests that Goldman expand its disclosure to provide more detail
regarding the errors or omissions related to its investor reports.

         As you are aware, pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB, JPMorgan
delivered a Management Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable
Servicing Criteria dated March 14, 2007 ("Management Report"). The Management
Report applied to the Platform (as defined in our Management Report), and the
Transaction was just one of many transactions included in the Platform.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
examined JPMorgan's compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB for the Platform described in the Management Report and
issued an attestation report to JPMorgan (the "Attestation Report"). The testing
of Item 1122(d)(3)(i) and (ii) by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was performed on
investor reports related to selected transactions, which did not include
investor reports relating to the Transaction. JPMorgan did not uncover any
errors or omissions relating to the Transaction in their examination of the
Platform. We emphasize that the work performed by JPMorgan in connection with
the Management Report and by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with the
Attestation Report related to JPMorgan's compliance with the Item 1122(d)
servicing criteria (a) in all material respects, and (b) with respect to
Platform, taken as a whole, and not just to the Transaction or any other
individual transaction. As a result, JPMorgan cannot provide any assurances that
there were no errors or omissions that might have been discovered with more
comprehensive testing relating solely to the Transaction.

                                      Very truly yours,

                                      /s/ Kelly Mathieson
                                      ------------------
                                      Kelly Mathieson
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6073

RICHARD MINTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-96-437-2)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Minter, Appellant Pro Se. Wirt Peebles Marks, IV, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997) and denying his motion for reconsideraton. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Minter v. Angelone,

No. CA-96-437-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 1 & Dec. 3, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
·.1. 

., 

. . • J: '~:---

Thank you for allowirigi.he Ptairl~'f~~nd PotawatorritN-afron theopportunityt~ prov ~ meaningful 

input on the gatherihifbt. ~~t~ ahd 1:l'rep~ration of problem formulations for these four flame 

retardant clust~t : _ · :: · · · · · · · · · · 

"I ... 

. .·. ~;l'i :r .. ;. > 

1/ilf:on~itv£~. Tribal Cd4~~i1Chairperson·· .: . . _ .... _. ___ ·. 

Prairie Ba ~i:i Potawatomi .Nahoi:i .--·· ·. ' . . . ."!:;'.~ .-. . •, . ' . . ... . · . . . 

··-::-. . . 

·( -:--·. · 

.a_i 

:· .. . · . .,... _ _.._ 

·· . ·- .· ·.·· ,- .. 

-~ ., . 

}-

. :~ . 

~· ~-; . . ·-

_,, .·i 

,· .. · .. ; ... ... : 

;! 

. : ./' 

,, 

::._ .·;· :· ..... 

·· ... 

.. :. '~~ . 

·-· . 

·; · 

. -:>J~~ ' 

.:· 

,.;, 

·-,. -~---

~ ._:· 

_:::·: 

,· . 

·(. 

....... 

·_.·!· 

'.
EXHIBIT
32.2




WAGERGEN
BIO-SYSTEMS, INC.


CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the annual report of WaferGen Bio-systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Amjad Huda, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.





Date:
April 29,
2008





By:
            /s/  Amjad
      HudaAmjad
      HudaChief
      Financial Officer and Director
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Danaos Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigned's knowledge, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



Dated:
April 4, 2008

/s/DIMITRI J. ANDRITSOYIANNISDimitri J. Andritsoyiannis Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
§ 550.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The General Counsel for the Commission shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to the General Counsel for the Commission, Marine Mammal Commission, Room 307, 1625-I Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found;
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 550.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 4579, Feb. 5, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 4579, Feb. 5, 1986]
----

| Depositor:                                | Structured                  Asset Securities CorporationAttention:                  Mortgage Finance LXS 2006-11745                  7th Avenue, 7th Floor New                  York, NY 10019               |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Master                  Servicer:         | Aurora                  Loan Services LLC Chris                  Baker327                  Inverness Drive SouthEnglewood,                  CO 80112                                                         |
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Trustee:                                  | LaSalle                  Bank, N.A.Attention:                  Global Securitization Trust Services Group LXS 2006-11135                  South LaSalle Street, Suite 1625Chicago,                  IL 60603 |
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Subject:                                  | Annual                  Officer's Certification                                                                                                                                                              |
| Fiscal                  Year:   | 2006                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Investor                  Code:           | F60                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| Investor                  Name:           | LXS                  2006-11                                                                                                                                                                                 |

|   | Certified                  by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  By/s/                  Terry L. Gentry            |
|   | Name:                  Terry L. Gentry                  |
|   | Title:                  Managing Director               |

----