alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen Linehan, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofCapital One Auto Finance Trust Series 2006-B (the “Exchange Act periodicreports”);

2.             Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.             Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodicreports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicingagreement in all material respects; and

5.             Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonablyrelied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: TheBank of New York, First Data Resources, Inc., REMITCO, LLC, FDI ComputerConsulting, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Date: March 28, 2007
|    |   | By:          |   | /s/ Stephen Linehan               |
|--------------|--------|--------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|    |   | Name:        |   | Stephen Linehan                   |
|    |   | Title:       |   | Treasurer                         |
|    |   |    |   | Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC |

 

----
§ 2525.45 Can an Eligible Individual or Designated Recipient appeal a denied request for an extension? ( a ) If an Eligible Individual or Designated Recipient submits a timely application for an extension and the application is denied, the individual may file an appeal. The appeal must: ( 1 ) Be received within 30 days of the denial determination;
( 2 ) Be made in writing—either online through the *My AmeriCorps* portal if the education award has not expired—or through a submission to the National Service Hotline at 1-800-942-2677;
( 3 ) Explain why the initial determination was erroneous/should be reviewed; and,
( 4 ) Include supporting documentation, if applicable.
( b ) AmeriCorps may grant an appeal when, after review of all the information provided originally and on appeal, it appears that the extension should have been granted. AmeriCorps may ask for additional documentation to inform the appeal determination.
( c ) Individuals who submit appeals will be notified in writing of the final determination.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 4 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                         Calendar No. 3
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 4

    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights 
                               Amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

  Mr. Cardin (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
            joint resolution; which was read the first time

                            January 25, 2023

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights 
                               Amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding any time 
limit contained in House Joint Resolution 208, 92nd Congress, as agreed 
to in the Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment proposed 
to the States in that joint resolution is valid to all intents and 
purposes as part of the Constitution, having been ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States.

                                                         Calendar No. 3

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 4

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights 
                               Amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 25, 2023

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
§ 1321.23 Appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board on area agency on aging withdrawal of designation. ( a ) This section sets forth hearing procedures afforded to affected parties if the State agency initiates an action or proceeding to withdraw designation of an area agency on aging.
( b ) Any area agency on aging that has appealed a State agency's decision to withdraw area agency on aging designation, and that has been provided a hearing and a written decision, may appeal the decision to the Departmental Appeals Board in writing following receipt of the State agency's written decision, in accordance with the procedures set forth in 45 CFR part 16. The applicant must, at the time of filing an appeal with the DAB, mail a copy of the appeal to the State agency and include a certificate of service with its initial filing. The DAB may refer an appeal to its Alternative Dispute Resolution Division for mediation prior to making a decision.
#### § 2520.45 How much time may an AmeriCorps member spend fundraising?

An AmeriCorps member may spend no more than ten percent of his or her originally agreed-upon term of service, as reflected in the member enrollment in the National Service Trust, performing fundraising activities, as described in § 2520.40.

[70 FR 39597, July 8, 2005]
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 11

- NM

- 107

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ADRANCH, LLC,

APPELLANT,

V.

PEE WEE’S WELDING SERVICE,

APPELLEE.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00115-CV

Appeal from the

83rd District Court

of Terrell County, Texas

(TC# 3150-A)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, ADRanch, LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal because the parties 

have resolved their dispute. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

November 8, 2017

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
§ 1628.5 Fund balance deficits. ( a ) Sound financial management practices such as those set out in Chapter 3 of the Corporation's Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients should preclude deficit spending. Use of current year LSC grant funds to liquidate deficit balances in the LSC fund from a preceding period requires the prior written approval of the Corporation.
( b ) Within 30 days of the submission of the recipient's annual audit, the recipient may apply to the Corporation for approval of the expenses associated with the liquidation of the deficit balance in the LSC fund.
( c ) In the absence of approval by the Corporation, expenditures of current year LSC grant funds to liquidate a deficit from a prior year shall be identified as questioned costs under 45 CFR part 1630.
( d ) The recipient's request must specify the same information relative to the deficit LSC fund balance as that set forth in § 1628.4(a)(1) and (2). Additionally, the recipient must develop and submit a plan approved by its governing body describing the measures which will be implemented to prevent a recurrence of a deficit balance in the LSC fund. The Corporation reserves the right to require changes in the submitted plan.
( e ) The decision of the Corporation regarding acceptance of these deficit-related costs shall be guided by the statutory mandate requiring the recipient to provide high quality legal services performed in an effective and economical manner. Special consideration will be given for emergencies, unusual occurrences, or other special circumstances giving rise to a deficit balance.
#### Samuel Cully, as Administrator of the Estate of Samuel A. Cully, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Francis N. Isham, Appellant.

*Oully*v. Isham, 125 App. Div. 97, affirmed.

(Submitted January 22, 1909;

decided February 16, 1909.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March IT, 1908, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover for services.

*Charles D. Newton*for appellant.

*Fletcher C. Peck*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
EXHIBIT 33.2

          Report on Assessment with Compliance with Servicing Criteria
                           for Asset-Backed Securities
                         (The Huntington National Bank)

     Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
                               Servicing Criteria

The Huntington National Bank, (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(vi),
(d)(3)(i.C), (d)(3)(i.D), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), and
(d)(4)(xiii), which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the automobile loans and leases covered
by this report (such criteria, after giving effect to the exceptions identified
above, the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The loans are leases covered by
this report include the asset-backed transactions included in Appendix A (the
"Automobile Loan and Lease Platform"). The Asserting Party has assessed its
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and
has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the
Reporting Period with respect to the Automobile Loan and Lease Platform taken as
a whole.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period as set
forth in this assertion.

The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer:

By:  /s/ Timothy R. Barber
     ------------------
Name:    Timothy R. Barber
Title:   Senior Vice President and Credit Policy Manager
Date:    March 15, 2007

<page>


                                   Appendix A

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for automobile loans and leases sold to the following trusts:

GS Auto Loan Trust 2003-1
Morgan Stanley Auto Loan Trust 2003-HB1
GS Whole Loan Trust
Morgan Stanley Auto Loan Trust 2004-HB1
Morgan Stanley Auto Loan Trust 2004-HB2
GS Whole Loan Trust II
GS Auto Loan Trust 2006-1
Huntington Auto Loan Trust 2006
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Derick Nhekairo, * From the 441st District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR40252

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00292

- CR * May 30, 2014

T he State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Freedom 4, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      February 27, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Virginia
      K. SourlisVirginia
      K. Sourlis
                      President
      and DirectorPrincipal
      Executive Officer
                      Principal
      Financial
Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


January 11, 2001

The Board of Directors
Net Matrix Limited
Unit 1806, Hutchison House
10 Harcourt Road
Central
Hong Kong


Dear Sirs,

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 20-F of our report dated January 2, 2001 included in this
Registration Statement. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to September 30, 2000 or
performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen & Co.
-------------------------
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________________ 

No: 17-1179

___________________ 

Robert C. McChesney, in his official capacity as Treasurer of Bart McLeary for U.S. Senate, 

Inc.; Bart McLeay for U.S. Senate, Inc.

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Federal Election Commission

 Defendant - Appellee

Caroline C. Hunter, in her official capacity as Chair of the Federal Election Commission

 Appellee

United States of America

 Defendant

______________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

(8:16-cv-00168-LSC)

______________________________________________________________________________

JUDGMENT

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, BEAM and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

This appeal from the United States District Court was submitted on the record of the 

district court, briefs of the parties and was argued by counsel. 

After consideration, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the district 

court in this cause is affirmed in accordance with the opinion of this Court. 

August 15, 2018

Order Entered in Accordance with Opinion: 

Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. 

____________________________________ 

 /s/ Michael E. Gans 

Appellate Case: 17-1179 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2018 Entry ID: 4693951
§ 1620.2 Definitions. ( a ) A *case* is a form of program service in which an attorney or paralegal of a recipient provides legal services to one or more specific clients, including, without limitation, providing representation in litigation, administrative proceedings, and negotiations, and such actions as advice, providing brief services and transactional assistance, and assistance with individual Private Attorney Involvement (PAI) cases.
( b ) A *matter* is an action which contributes to the overall delivery of program services but does not involve direct legal advice to or legal representation of one or more specific clients. Examples of matters include both direct services, such as community education presentations, operating pro se clinics, providing information about the availability of legal assistance, and developing written materials explaining legal rights and responsibilities; and indirect services, such as training, continuing legal education, general supervision of program services, preparing and disseminating desk manuals, PAI recruitment, intake when no case is undertaken, and tracking substantive law developments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,580
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          63,322
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,087
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,087
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,087
<LOANS>                                         61,447
<ALLOWANCE>                                        825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,592
<DEPOSITS>                                      72,602
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                568
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,390
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,968)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  80,592
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,962
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  207
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   427
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,596
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,579
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,579
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,017
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (567)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (567)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (567)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.92
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,491
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   715
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  825
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 223.304 Sale of property contracts. All contracts determined under § 223.301(b) to be a contract for a sale of property shall: ( a ) Utilize the provisions of subparts A and B of this part, except that the following provisions will not be applicable: ( 1 ) Section 223.4 Exchange of trees or portions of trees.
( 2 ) Section 223.31 Duration of contracts.
( 3 ) Section 223.42 Transfer of effective purchaser credits.
( 4 ) Section 223.43 Limit on amounts of transferred purchaser credits.
( 5 ) Section 223.44 Collection rights on contracts involved in transfer of purchaser credit.
( 6 ) Section 223.44 Collection rights on contracts involved in transfer of purchaser credit.
( 7 ) Section 223.45 Definitions applicable to transfer of purchaser credit.
( 8 ) Section 223.49 Downpayments. Paragraph (d).
( 9 ) Section 223.62 Timber purchaser road construction credit.
( 10 ) Section 223.65 Appraisal of timber for land exchange; right-of-way, or other authorized use.
( 11 ) Section 223.80 When advertisement is required.
( 12 ) Section 223.82 Contents of advertisement.
( 13 ) Section 223.83 Contents of prospectus.
( 14 ) Section 223.84 Small business bid form provisions on sales with specified road construction.
( 15 ) Section 223.88 Bidding methods.
( 16 ) Section 223.100 Award to highest bidder.
( 17 ) Section 223.102 Procedure when sale is not awarded to highest bidder.
( 18 ) Section 223.103 Award of small business set aside sales.
( 19 ) Section 223.118 Appeal process for small business timber sale set-aside program share recomputation decisions.
( b ) Include the following additional provisions: ( 1 ) If determined by the Forest Service to be necessary to protect the interests of the United States, a performance and payment bond, as described on February 7, 2014, in section 28-103-2 and 28-103-3 of Part 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, in an amount sufficient to protect the investment in receipts by the United States generated by the contractor from the estimated value of the forest products to be removed under the contract;
( 2 ) Provide for a fire liability provision.
( 3 ) Redetermination of stumpage rates and deposits: The cost of service work included in stewardship contracts will be evaluated along with stumpage values at the time of a rate determination in accordance with normal rate determination procedures.
( 4 ) Products may be valued on a per acre basis.
( 5 ) Such other provisions as are necessary to carry out the provisions of section 604 of the Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6591c).